Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function -/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ` -/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element -/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ a` is the least element greater than `a` -/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function -/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred` -/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element -/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred b` is the greatest element less than `b` -/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h }
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
variable (α)
open Classical in
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun _ ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.succ_le := succ_le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMax.of_succ_le, _root_.IsMax.succ_le⟩ := succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
theorem lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (hab : b ≤ a) (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a :=
hab.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (succ_le_of_lt h) hb
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h]
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
/-- See also `Order.succ_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma le_succ_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax hab.lt.not_isMax) <| hab.lt.succ_le.lt_of_not_le hba
· exact hba.trans (le_succ _)
alias _root_.WCovBy.le_succ := le_succ_of_wcovBy
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x :=
id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_succ _ _
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
rw [← iterate_succ_apply' succ]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) :=
fun _ => (lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · ha)
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb h
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_of_le : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · <| not_isMax b)
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[gcongr] theorem succ_lt_succ (hab : a < b) : succ a < succ b := by simp [hab]
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ (a : α) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) :=
Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) :=
Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
lemma le_iff_eq_or_succ_le : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ succ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· simpa [ha.succ_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a =>
h.2.antisymm (succ_le_of_lt <| h.1.lt_of_ne <| hba.symm),
?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, le_succ b⟩
· exact ⟨le_succ a, le_rfl⟩
/-- See also `Order.le_succ_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma succ_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : succ a = b := (succ_le_of_lt h.lt).antisymm h.wcovBy.le_succ
alias _root_.CovBy.succ_eq := succ_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_succ [PartialOrder β] [SuccOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (succ a) = succ (f a) := by
by_cases h : IsMax a
· rw [h.succ_eq, (f.isMax_apply.2 h).succ_eq]
· exact (f.map_covBy.2 <| covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h).succ_eq.symm
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem succ_eq_iff_covBy : succ a = b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact covBy_succ _, CovBy.succ_eq⟩
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem succ_top : succ (⊤ : α) = ⊤ := by
rw [succ_eq_iff_isMax, isMax_iff_eq_top]
theorem succ_le_iff_eq_top : succ a ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
succ_le_iff_isMax.trans isMax_iff_eq_top
theorem lt_succ_iff_ne_top : a < succ a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.trans not_isMax_iff_ne_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem bot_lt_succ (a : α) : ⊥ < succ a :=
(lt_succ_of_not_isMax not_isMax_bot).trans_le <| succ_mono bot_le
theorem succ_ne_bot (a : α) : succ a ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_succ a).ne'
end OrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem le_of_lt_succ {a b : α} : a < succ b → a ≤ b := fun h ↦ by
by_contra! nh
exact (h.trans_le (succ_le_of_lt nh)).false
theorem lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_lt_succ, fun h => h.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha⟩
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha]
theorem succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
theorem Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ici_inter_Iic]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb,
succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb]
theorem le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : a ≤ succ b ↔ a = succ b ∨ a ≤ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· rw [hb.succ_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_eq]
· rw [← lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
(lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem not_isMin_succ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : ¬ IsMin (succ a) := by
obtain ha | ha := (le_succ a).eq_or_lt
· exact (ha ▸ succ_eq_iff_isMax.1 ha.symm).not_isMin
· exact not_isMin_of_lt ha
theorem Iic_succ (a : α) : Iic (succ a) = insert (succ a) (Iic a) :=
ext fun _ => le_succ_iff_eq_or_le
theorem Icc_succ_right (h : a ≤ succ b) : Icc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Icc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h)]
theorem Ioc_succ_right (h : a < succ b) : Ioc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Ioc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h)]
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax h
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ici, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h₁)]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ioi, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h₁)]
section NoMaxOrder
| variable [NoMaxOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 458 | 461 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
· simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi ht ((toReal_le_pi θ).lt_of_ne (toReal_eq_pi_iff.not.2 h)))]
theorem coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} (h : 0 ≤ θ.sign) : ↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [abs_eq_self.2 (toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg.2 h), coe_toReal]
theorem neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos {θ : Angle} (h : θ.sign ≤ 0) : -↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [SignType.nonpos_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h)
· rw [abs_of_neg (toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.2 h), coe_neg, neg_neg, coe_toReal]
· rw [sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
theorem eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq {θ ψ : Angle} :
θ = ψ ↔ θ.sign = ψ.sign ∧ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h with ⟨hs, hr⟩
rw [abs_eq_abs] at hr
rcases hr with (hr | hr)
· exact toReal_injective hr
· by_cases h : θ = π
· rw [h, toReal_pi, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal ψ).ne hr)
· by_cases h' : ψ = π
· rw [h', toReal_pi] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal θ).ne hr.symm)
· rw [← sign_toReal h, ← sign_toReal h', hr, Left.sign_neg, SignType.neg_eq_self_iff,
_root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hs
rw [hs, toReal_zero, neg_zero, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hr
rw [hr, hs]
theorem eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : θ.sign = ψ.sign) :
θ = ψ ↔ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by simpa [h] using @eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq θ ψ
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi_div_two : (↑(π / 2) : Angle).sign = 1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, sin_pi_div_two, sign_one]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_neg_pi_div_two : (↑(-π / 2) : Angle).sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, neg_div, Real.sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two, Left.sign_neg, sign_one]
theorem sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
0 ≤ (θ : Angle).sign := by
rw [sign, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_neg_coe_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
(-θ : Angle).sign ≤ 0 := by
rw [sign, sign_nonpos_iff, sin_neg, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_two_nsmul_eq_sign_iff {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).sign = θ.sign ↔ θ = π ∨ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
by_cases hpi : θ = π; · simp [hpi]
rw [or_iff_right hpi]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt, le_abs, le_neg] at hle
have hpi' : θ.toReal ≠ π := by simpa using hpi
rcases hle with (hle | hle) <;> rcases hle.eq_or_lt with (heq | hlt)
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, ← heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, sign_pos (pi_div_two_pos.trans hlt), ← sign_toReal,
two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi.2 hlt, _root_.sign_neg] at h
· simp at h
· rw [← mul_sub]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg two_pos (sub_neg.2 ((toReal_le_pi _).lt_of_ne hpi'))
· intro he
simp [he] at h
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, _root_.sign_neg (hlt.trans (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 pi_div_two_pos)), ←
sign_toReal] at h
swap
· intro he
simp [he] at h
rw [← neg_div] at hlt
rw [two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi.2 hlt.le, sign_pos] at h
· simp at h
· linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· have hpi' : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ π := by
rw [Ne, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff, not_or]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp [pi_pos, div_pos, abs_of_pos] at h
· rintro rfl
rw [toReal_neg_pi_div_two] at h
simp [pi_pos, div_pos, neg_div, abs_of_pos] at h
rw [abs_lt, ← neg_div] at h
rw [← sign_toReal hpi, ← sign_toReal hpi', two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul.2 ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩,
sign_mul, sign_pos (zero_lt_two' ℝ), one_mul]
theorem sign_two_zsmul_eq_sign_iff {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).sign = θ.sign ↔ θ = π ∨ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, sign_two_nsmul_eq_sign_iff]
theorem continuousAt_sign {θ : Angle} (h0 : θ ≠ 0) (hpi : θ ≠ π) : ContinuousAt sign θ :=
(continuousAt_sign_of_ne_zero (sin_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨h0, hpi⟩)).comp continuous_sin.continuousAt
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.angle_sign_comp {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → Angle}
{s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : ∀ z ∈ s, f z ≠ 0 ∧ f z ≠ π) :
ContinuousOn (sign ∘ f) s := by
| refine (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun θ hθ => ?_).comp hf (Set.mapsTo_image f s)
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hθ
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 870 | 871 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
· intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
apply AnalyticOn.comp _ _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
· exact ContinuousLinearEquiv.analyticOn _ _
· exact (h'p i).comp (g.analyticOn _) (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
((((hf.of_le hi).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap
g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl h's hx).symm
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear equiv. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
fderivWithin 𝕜
(ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft _ (fun _x : Fin i => g) ∘
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s ∘ g)) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
rw [this, ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx),
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', coe_coe, comp_apply, tail_def, tail_def]
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G →L[𝕜] E) {f : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : G) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x =
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ _) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)‖ := by
have : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f hs hx i
rw [this, ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F) (x : G)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ (g x)) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
constructor
· intro H
simpa [← preimage_comp, Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
· intro H
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H
exact H.comp_continuousLinearMap _
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffOn_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨fun H => by simpa [Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G),
fun H => H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e : G →L[𝕜] E)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ, ← contDiffOn_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffOn_comp_iff
end linear
/-! ### The Cartesian product of two C^n functions is C^n. -/
section prod
/-- If two functions `f` and `g` admit Taylor series `p` and `q` in a set `s`, then the cartesian
product of `f` and `g` admits the cartesian product of `p` and `q` as a Taylor series. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prodMk {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) {g : E → G}
{q : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E G} (hg : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n g q s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (fun y => (f y, g y)) (fun y k => (p y k).prod (q y k)) s := by
set L := fun m => ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin m => E) F G
constructor
· intro x hx; rw [← hf.zero_eq x hx, ← hg.zero_eq x hx]; rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (L m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx).prodMk (hg.fderivWithin m hm x hx))
· intro m hm
exact (L m).continuous.comp_continuousOn ((hf.cont m hm).prodMk (hg.cont m hm))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prod := HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point in a domain is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.prodMk {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨v, hv, q, hq, h'q⟩ := hg
refine ⟨u ∩ v, Filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono inter_subset_left).prodMk (hq.mono inter_subset_right), fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦ ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL _ _ _ _ (p x i, q x i)) (u ∩ v)
apply (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _).comp_analyticOn _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ((h'p i).mono inter_subset_left).prod ((h'q i).mono inter_subset_right)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩
exact ⟨u ∩ v, Filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono inter_subset_left).prodMk (hq.mono inter_subset_right)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.prod := ContDiffWithinAt.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.prodMk {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffOn.prod := ContDiffOn.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.prodMk {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) x :=
contDiffWithinAt_univ.1 <| hf.contDiffWithinAt.prodMk hg.contDiffWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiffAt.prod := ContDiffAt.prodMk
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.prodMk {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E => (f x, g x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| hf.contDiffOn.prodMk hg.contDiffOn
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-09")]
alias ContDiff.prod := ContDiff.prodMk
end prod
section comp
/-!
### Composition of `C^n` functions
We show that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. One way to do this would be to
use the following simple inductive proof. Assume it is done for `n`.
Then, to check it for `n+1`, one needs to check that the derivative of `g ∘ f` is `C^n`, i.e.,
that `Dg(f x) ⬝ Df(x)` is `C^n`. The term `Dg (f x)` is the composition of two `C^n` functions, so
it is `C^n` by the inductive assumption. The term `Df(x)` is also `C^n`. Then, the matrix
multiplication is the application of a bilinear map (which is `C^∞`, and therefore `C^n`) to
`x ↦ (Dg(f x), Df x)`. As the composition of two `C^n` maps, it is again `C^n`, and we are done.
There are two difficulties in this proof.
The first one is that it is an induction over all Banach
spaces. In Lean, this is only possible if they belong to a fixed universe. One could formalize this
by first proving the statement in this case, and then extending the result to general universes
by embedding all the spaces we consider in a common universe through `ULift`.
The second one is that it does not work cleanly for analytic maps: for this case, we need to
exhibit a whole sequence of derivatives which are all analytic, not just finitely many of them, so
an induction is never enough at a finite step.
Both these difficulties can be overcome with some cost. However, we choose a different path: we
write down an explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of `g ∘ f` in terms of derivatives of
`g` and `f` (this is the formula of Faa-Di Bruno) and use this formula to get a suitable Taylor
expansion for `g ∘ f`. Writing down the formula of Faa-Di Bruno is not easy as the formula is quite
intricate, but it is also useful for other purposes and once available it makes the proof here
essentially trivial.
-/
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (st : MapsTo f s t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
have h'f : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ω f s x := hf
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := h'f
obtain ⟨v, hv, q, hq, h'q⟩ := hg
let w := insert x s ∩ (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := fun y hy => hy.2.2
have wu : w ⊆ u := fun y hy => hy.2.1
refine ⟨w, ?_, fun y ↦ (q (f y)).taylorComp (p y), hq.comp (hp.mono wu) wv, ?_⟩
· apply inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem hu ?_)
apply (continuousWithinAt_insert_self.2 hf.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ hv
simp only [image_insert_eq]
apply insert_subset_insert
exact image_subset_iff.mpr st
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f w := by
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f y)) w :=
((h'p 0).mono wu).congr fun y hy ↦ (hp.zero_eq' (wu hy)).symm
have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F)
((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f y))) w :=
AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn (LinearIsometryEquiv.analyticOnNhd _ _ ) this
(mapsTo_univ _ _)
simpa using this
exact analyticOn_taylorComp h'q (fun n ↦ (h'p n).mono wu) this wv
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩
let w := insert x s ∩ (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := fun y hy => hy.2.2
have wu : w ⊆ u := fun y hy => hy.2.1
refine ⟨w, ?_, fun y ↦ (q (f y)).taylorComp (p y), hq.comp (hp.mono wu) wv⟩
apply inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem hu ?_)
apply (continuousWithinAt_insert_self.2 hf.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ hv
simp only [image_insert_eq]
apply insert_subset_insert
exact image_subset_iff.mpr st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (st : MapsTo f s t) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx ↦ ContDiffWithinAt.comp x (hg (f x) (st hx)) (hf x hx) st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_inter
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")] alias ContDiffOn.comp' := ContDiffOn.comp_inter
/-- The composition of a `C^n` function on a domain with a `C^n` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
(contDiffOn_univ.2 hg).comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_contDiff {s : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : ContDiff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ] at *
exact hg.comp hf fun x _ => hs x
theorem ContDiffOn.image_comp_contDiff {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g (f '' s)) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.comp hf.contDiffOn (s.mapsTo_image f)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp (contDiffOn_univ.2 hg) (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) (subset_univ _)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_eq {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (st : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp x hf st
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hs).comp x hf (subset_preimage_image f s)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image_of_eq
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image x hf hs
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_inter {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_inter_of_eq {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F}
(x : E) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_inter x hf
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.comp_inter x hf).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin hs)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`,
with a weaker condition on `s` and `t`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin_of_eq
{s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {y : F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t y) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hs : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin x hf hs
theorem ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x))
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt_of_eq {y : F} (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g y)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hy : f x = y) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points is `C^n`. -/
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.comp (x : E) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x)) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffWithinAt {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f t x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) t x :=
haveI : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g univ (f x) := h.contDiffAt.contDiffWithinAt
this.comp x hf (subset_univ _)
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffAt {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt hf
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_of_eventually_mem {t : Set F}
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hxs : x ∈ s) (hst : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, f y ∈ t)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x) i := by
obtain ⟨u, hxu, huo, hfu, hgu⟩ : ∃ u, x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u ∧
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) (s ∩ u) ∧
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i g (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t) (f '' (s ∩ u)) := by
have hxt : f x ∈ t := hst.self_of_nhdsWithin hxs
have hf_tendsto : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] (f x)) :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff.mpr ⟨hf.continuousWithinAt, hst⟩
have H₁ : ∀ᶠ u in (𝓝[s] x).smallSets,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i f (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s) u :=
hf.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn hs hxs hi
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ u in (𝓝[s] x).smallSets,
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn i g (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t) (f '' u) :=
hf_tendsto.image_smallSets.eventually (hg.eventually_hasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn ht hxt hi)
rcases (nhdsWithin_basis_open _ _).smallSets.eventually_iff.mp (H₁.and H₂)
with ⟨u, ⟨hxu, huo⟩, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, hxu, huo, hu (by simp [inter_comm])⟩
exact .symm <| (hgu.comp hfu (mapsTo_image _ _)).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl
(hs.inter huo) ⟨hxs, hxu⟩ |>.trans <| iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open huo hxu
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_comp {t : Set F} (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x))
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hst : MapsTo f s t) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeriesWithin 𝕜 f s x) i :=
iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_of_eventually_mem hg hf ht hs hx (eventually_mem_nhdsWithin.mono hst) hi
theorem iteratedFDeriv_comp (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f x)) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x =
(ftaylorSeries 𝕜 g (f x)).taylorComp (ftaylorSeries 𝕜 f x) i := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← ftaylorSeriesWithin_univ]
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_comp hg.contDiffWithinAt hf.contDiffWithinAt
uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ _) (mapsTo_univ _ _) hi
end comp
/-!
### Smoothness of projections
-/
/-- The first projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_fst : ContDiff 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff IsBoundedLinearMap.fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.fst {f : E → F × G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).1 :=
contDiff_fst.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.fst' {f : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E × F => f x.1 :=
hf.comp contDiff_fst
/-- The first projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fst {s : Set (E × F)} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) s :=
ContDiff.contDiffOn contDiff_fst
theorem ContDiffOn.fst {f : E → F × G} {s : Set E} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).1) s :=
contDiff_fst.comp_contDiffOn hf
/-- The first projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_fst {p : E × F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) p :=
contDiff_fst.contDiffAt
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).1) x :=
contDiffAt_fst.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst' {f : E → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.1) (x, y) :=
ContDiffAt.comp (x, y) hf contDiffAt_fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.fst` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fst'' {f : E → G} {x : E × F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x.1) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.1) x :=
hf.comp x contDiffAt_fst
/-- The first projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_fst {s : Set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Prod.fst : E × F → E) s p :=
contDiff_fst.contDiffWithinAt
/-- The second projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_snd : ContDiff 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff IsBoundedLinearMap.snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.snd {f : E → F × G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).2 :=
contDiff_snd.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
theorem ContDiff.snd' {f : F → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E × F => f x.2 :=
hf.comp contDiff_snd
/-- The second projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_snd {s : Set (E × F)} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) s :=
ContDiff.contDiffOn contDiff_snd
theorem ContDiffOn.snd {f : E → F × G} {s : Set E} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).2) s :=
contDiff_snd.comp_contDiffOn hf
/-- The second projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffAt_snd {p : E × F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) p :=
contDiff_snd.contDiffAt
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).2) x :=
contDiffAt_snd.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd' {f : F → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f y) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.2) (x, y) :=
ContDiffAt.comp (x, y) hf contDiffAt_snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `Prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
theorem ContDiffAt.snd'' {f : F → G} {x : E × F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x.2) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E × F => f x.2) x :=
hf.comp x contDiffAt_snd
/-- The second projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_snd {s : Set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Prod.snd : E × F → F) s p :=
contDiff_snd.contDiffWithinAt
section NAry
variable {E₁ E₂ E₃ : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E₁] [NormedAddCommGroup E₂] [NormedAddCommGroup E₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E₃]
theorem ContDiff.comp₂ {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf₁ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
hg.comp <| hf₁.prodMk hf₂
theorem ContDiffAt.comp₂ {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {x : F}
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f₁ x, f₂ x))
(hf₁ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₁ x) (hf₂ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₂ x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
hg.comp x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
theorem ContDiffAt.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂}
{s : Set F} {x : F} (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g (f₁ x, f₂ x))
(hf₁ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x) (hf₂ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₂ s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
hg.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt₂ := ContDiffAt.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {x : F}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₁ x) (hf₂ : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f₂ x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) x :=
hg.contDiffAt.comp₂ hf₁ hf₂
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffAt₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂}
{s : Set F} {x : F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf₁ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₁ s x) (hf₂ : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f₂ s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s x :=
hg.contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf₁.prodMk hf₂)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffWithinAt₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt
theorem ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {s : Set F}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s) (hf₂ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) s :=
hg.comp_contDiffOn <| hf₁.prodMk hf₂
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn₂ := ContDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn
theorem ContDiff.comp₃ {g : E₁ × E₂ × E₃ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {f₃ : F → E₃}
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) (hf₃ : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₃) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x) :=
hg.comp₂ hf₁ <| hf₂.prodMk hf₃
theorem ContDiff.comp₃_contDiffOn {g : E₁ × E₂ × E₃ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {f₃ : F → E₃}
{s : Set F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₁ s) (hf₂ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s)
(hf₃ : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₃ s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => g (f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x)) s :=
hg.comp₂_contDiffOn hf₁ <| hf₂.prodMk hf₃
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn₃ := ContDiff.comp₃_contDiffOn
end NAry
section SpecificBilinearMaps
theorem ContDiff.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (g x).comp (f x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.contDiff.comp₂ (g := fun p => p.1.comp p.2) hg hf
theorem ContDiffOn.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set X}
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) s :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (F := F) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hg hf
theorem ContDiffAt.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {x : X}
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hg hf
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.clm_comp {g : X → F →L[𝕜] G} {f : X → E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set X} {x : X}
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x).comp (f x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp (E := E) (G := G)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hg hf
theorem ContDiff.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x) (g x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂ hf hg
theorem ContDiffOn.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) s :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hf hg
theorem ContDiffAt.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) x :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hf hg
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.clm_apply {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x) (g x)) s x :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hf hg
theorem ContDiff.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x) :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight.contDiff.comp₂ (g := fun p => p.1.smulRight p.2) hf hg
theorem ContDiffOn.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) s :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn hf hg
theorem ContDiffAt.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffAt hf hg
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.smulRight {f : E → F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {g : E → G}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => (f x).smulRight (g x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight (E := F)).contDiff.comp₂_contDiffWithinAt hf hg
end SpecificBilinearMaps
section ClmApplyConst
/-- Application of a `ContinuousLinearMap` to a constant commutes with `iteratedFDerivWithin`. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_clm_apply_const_apply
{s : Set E} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {c : E → F →L[𝕜] G}
(hc : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n c s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) {u : F} {m : Fin i → E} :
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x) m = (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i c s x) m u := by
induction i generalizing x with
| zero => simp
| succ i ih =>
replace hi : (i : WithTop ℕ∞) < n := lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_cast; simp) hi
have h_deriv_apply : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s) s :=
(hc.clm_apply contDiffOn_const).differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hi hs
have h_deriv : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i c s) s :=
hc.differentiableOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hi hs
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
rw [← fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv_apply x hx)]
rw [fderivWithin_congr' (fun x hx ↦ ih hi.le hx) hx]
rw [fderivWithin_clm_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv.continuousMultilinear_apply_const _ x hx)
(differentiableWithinAt_const u)]
rw [fderivWithin_const_apply]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero, zero_add]
rw [fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hs x hx) (h_deriv x hx)]
/-- Application of a `ContinuousLinearMap` to a constant commutes with `iteratedFDeriv`. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_clm_apply_const_apply
{c : E → F →L[𝕜] G} (hc : ContDiff 𝕜 n c)
{i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) {x : E} {u : F} {m : Fin i → E} :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) m = (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i c x) m u := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact iteratedFDerivWithin_clm_apply_const_apply uniqueDiffOn_univ hc.contDiffOn hi (mem_univ _)
end ClmApplyConst
/-- The natural equivalence `(E × F) × G ≃ E × (F × G)` is smooth.
Warning: if you think you need this lemma, it is likely that you can simplify your proof by
reformulating the lemma that you're applying next using the tips in
Note [continuity lemma statement]
-/
theorem contDiff_prodAssoc {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| Equiv.prodAssoc E F G :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.prodAssoc 𝕜 E F G).contDiff
/-- The natural equivalence `E × (F × G) ≃ (E × F) × G` is smooth.
Warning: see remarks attached to `contDiff_prodAssoc`
-/
theorem contDiff_prodAssoc_symm {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| (Equiv.prodAssoc E F G).symm :=
(LinearIsometryEquiv.prodAssoc 𝕜 E F G).symm.contDiff
/-! ### Bundled derivatives are smooth -/
section bundled
/-- One direction of `contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt`, but where all derivatives are
taken within the same set. Version for partial derivatives / functions with parameters. If `f x` is
a `C^n+1` family of functions and `g x` is a `C^n` family of points, then the derivative of `f x` at
`g x` depends in a `C^n` way on `x`. We give a general version of this fact relative to sets which
may not have unique derivatives, in the following form. If `f : E × F → G` is `C^n+1` at
`(x₀, g(x₀))` in `(s ∪ {x₀}) × t ⊆ E × F` and `g : E → F` is `C^n` at `x₀` within some set `s ⊆ E`,
then there is a function `f' : E → F →L[𝕜] G` that is `C^n` at `x₀` within `s` such that for all `x`
sufficiently close to `x₀` within `s ∪ {x₀}` the function `y ↦ f x y` has derivative `f' x` at `g x`
within `t ⊆ F`. For convenience, we return an explicit set of `x`'s where this holds that is a
subset of `s ∪ {x₀}`. We need one additional condition, namely that `t` is a neighborhood of
`g(x₀)` within `g '' s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F} (hn : n ≠ ∞)
{x₀ : E} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (n + 1) (uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x₀) (hgt : t ∈ 𝓝[g '' s] g x₀) :
∃ v ∈ 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, v ⊆ insert x₀ s ∧ ∃ f' : E → F →L[𝕜] G,
(∀ x ∈ v, HasFDerivWithinAt (f x) (f' x) t (g x)) ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x => f' x) s x₀ := by
have hst : insert x₀ s ×ˢ t ∈ 𝓝[(fun x => (x, g x)) '' s] (x₀, g x₀) := by
refine nhdsWithin_mono _ ?_ (nhdsWithin_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin hgt)
simp_rw [image_subset_iff, mk_preimage_prod, preimage_id', subset_inter_iff, subset_insert,
true_and, subset_preimage_image]
obtain ⟨v, hv, hvs, f_an, f', hvf', hf'⟩ :=
(contDiffWithinAt_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt' hn).mp hf
refine
⟨(fun z => (z, g z)) ⁻¹' v ∩ insert x₀ s, ?_, inter_subset_right, fun z =>
(f' (z, g z)).comp (ContinuousLinearMap.inr 𝕜 E F), ?_, ?_⟩
· refine inter_mem ?_ self_mem_nhdsWithin
have := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) hv
refine mem_nhdsWithin_insert.mpr ⟨this, ?_⟩
refine (continuousWithinAt_id.prodMk hg.continuousWithinAt).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' ?_
rw [← nhdsWithin_le_iff] at hst hv ⊢
exact (hst.trans <| nhdsWithin_mono _ <| subset_insert _ _).trans hv
· intro z hz
have := hvf' (z, g z) hz.1
refine this.comp _ (hasFDerivAt_prodMk_right _ _).hasFDerivWithinAt ?_
exact mapsTo'.mpr (image_prodMk_subset_prod_right hz.2)
· exact (hf'.continuousLinearMap_comp <| (ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 F (E × F) G).flip
(ContinuousLinearMap.inr 𝕜 E F)).comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image x₀
(contDiffWithinAt_id.prodMk hg) hst
/-- The most general lemma stating that `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)` is `C^n`
at a point within a set.
To show that `x ↦ D_yf(x,y)g(x)` (taken within `t`) is `C^m` at `x₀` within `s`, we require that
* `f` is `C^n` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` within `(s ∪ {x₀}) × t` for `n ≥ m+1`.
* `g` is `C^m` at `x₀` within `s`;
* Derivatives are unique at `g(x)` within `t` for `x` sufficiently close to `x₀` within `s ∪ {x₀}`;
* `t` is a neighborhood of `g(x₀)` within `g '' s`; -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin'' {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀)
(ht : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t (g x)) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n)
(hgt : t ∈ 𝓝[g '' s] g x₀) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
have : ∀ k : ℕ, k ≤ m → ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 k (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
intro k hkm
obtain ⟨v, hv, -, f', hvf', hf'⟩ :=
(hf.of_le <| (add_le_add_right hkm 1).trans hmn).hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds (by simp)
(hg.of_le hkm) hgt
refine hf'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert ?_
filter_upwards [hv, ht]
exact fun y hy h2y => (hvf' y hy).fderivWithin h2y
match m with
| ω =>
obtain rfl : n = ω := by simpa using hmn
obtain ⟨v, hv, -, f', hvf', hf'⟩ := hf.hasFDerivWithinAt_nhds (by simp) hg hgt
refine hf'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert ?_
filter_upwards [hv, ht]
exact fun y hy h2y => (hvf' y hy).fderivWithin h2y
| ∞ =>
rw [contDiffWithinAt_infty]
exact fun k ↦ this k (by exact_mod_cast le_top)
| (m : ℕ) => exact this _ le_rfl
/-- A special case of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin''` where we require that `s ⊆ g⁻¹(t)`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin' {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (insert x₀ s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀)
(ht : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[insert x₀ s] x₀, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t (g x)) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n)
(hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ :=
hf.fderivWithin'' hg ht hmn <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin <| image_subset_iff.mpr hst
/-- A special case of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin'` where we require that `x₀ ∈ s` and there
are unique derivatives everywhere within `t`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s)
(hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x)) s x₀ := by
rw [← insert_eq_self.mpr hx₀] at hf
refine hf.fderivWithin' hg ?_ hmn hst
rw [insert_eq_self.mpr hx₀]
exact eventually_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin fun x hx => ht _ (hst hx)
/-- `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x) (k x)` is smooth at a point within a set. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_apply {f : E → F → G} {g k : E → F} {t : Set F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (s ×ˢ t) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m g s x₀) (hk : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m k s x₀) (ht : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 t)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hst : s ⊆ g ⁻¹' t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 (f x) t (g x) (k x)) s x₀ :=
(contDiff_fst.clm_apply contDiff_snd).contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x₀
((hf.fderivWithin hg ht hmn hx₀ hst).prodMk hk)
/-- `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s` is smooth at `x₀` within `s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x₀ :=
ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin
(ContDiffWithinAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffWithinAt_snd <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s s)
contDiffWithinAt_id hs hmn hx₀s (by rw [preimage_id'])
/-- `x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x (k x)` is smooth at `x₀` within `s`. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right_apply
{f : F → G} {k : F → F} {s : Set F} {x₀ : F}
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀) (hk : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m k s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x (k x)) s x₀ :=
ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_apply
(ContDiffWithinAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffWithinAt_snd <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s s)
contDiffWithinAt_id hk hs hmn hx₀s (by rw [preimage_id'])
-- TODO: can we make a version of `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin` for iterated derivatives?
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFDerivWithin_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x₀)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + i ≤ n) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x₀ := by
induction' i with i hi generalizing m
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, add_zero] at hmn
exact (hf.of_le hmn).continuousLinearMap_comp
((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm : _ →L[𝕜] E [×0]→L[𝕜] F)
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_comm _ 1, ← add_assoc] at hmn
exact ((hi hmn).fderivWithin_right hs le_rfl hx₀s).continuousLinearMap_comp
((continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin (i+1) ↦ E) F).symm :
_ →L[𝕜] E [×(i+1)]→L[𝕜] F)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-15")]
alias ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFderivWithin_right := ContDiffWithinAt.iteratedFDerivWithin_right
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is smooth at `x₀`. -/
protected theorem ContDiffAt.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (Function.uncurry f) (x₀, g x₀)) (hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m g x₀)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)) x₀ := by
simp_rw [← fderivWithin_univ]
refine (ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin hf.contDiffWithinAt hg.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ
hmn (mem_univ x₀) ?_).contDiffAt univ_mem
rw [preimage_univ]
/-- `fderiv 𝕜 f` is smooth at `x₀`. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.fderiv_right (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x₀) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (fderiv 𝕜 f) x₀ :=
ContDiffAt.fderiv (ContDiffAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contDiffAt_snd) contDiffAt_id hmn
theorem ContDiffAt.iteratedFDeriv_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x₀)
(hmn : m + i ≤ n) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 m (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f) x₀ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hf.iteratedFDerivWithin_right uniqueDiffOn_univ hmn trivial
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is smooth. -/
protected theorem ContDiff.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 m <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hnm : n + 1 ≤ m) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _ => hf.contDiffAt.fderiv hg.contDiffAt hnm
/-- `fderiv 𝕜 f` is smooth. -/
theorem ContDiff.fderiv_right (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiff 𝕜 m (fderiv 𝕜 f) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _x => hf.contDiffAt.fderiv_right hmn
theorem ContDiff.iteratedFDeriv_right {i : ℕ} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hmn : m + i ≤ n) : ContDiff 𝕜 m (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.mpr fun _x => hf.contDiffAt.iteratedFDeriv_right hmn
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x)` is continuous. -/
theorem Continuous.fderiv {f : E → F → G} {g : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : Continuous g) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
Continuous fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) :=
(hf.fderiv (contDiff_zero.mpr hg) hn).continuous
/-- `x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) (k x)` is smooth. -/
theorem ContDiff.fderiv_apply {f : E → F → G} {g k : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 m <| Function.uncurry f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hk : ContDiff 𝕜 n k)
(hnm : n + 1 ≤ m) : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => fderiv 𝕜 (f x) (g x) (k x) :=
(hf.fderiv hg hnm).clm_apply hk
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply {s : Set E} {f : E → F} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (fun p : E × E => (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2) (s ×ˢ univ) :=
((hf.fderivWithin hs hmn).comp contDiffOn_fst (prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _)).clm_apply
contDiffOn_snd
/-- If a function is at least `C^1`, its bundled derivative (mapping `(x, v)` to `Df(x) v`) is
continuous. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_fderivWithin_apply (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) :
ContinuousOn (fun p : E × E => (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s p.1 : E → F) p.2) (s ×ˢ univ) :=
(contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply (m := 0) hf hs hn).continuousOn
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContDiff.contDiff_fderiv_apply {f : E → F} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiff 𝕜 m fun p : E × E => (fderiv 𝕜 f p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2 := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ] at hf ⊢
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← univ_prod_univ]
exact contDiffOn_fderivWithin_apply hf uniqueDiffOn_univ hmn
end bundled
section deriv
/-!
### One dimension
All results up to now have been expressed in terms of the general Fréchet derivative `fderiv`. For
maps defined on the field, the one-dimensional derivative `deriv` is often easier to use. In this
paragraph, we reformulate some higher smoothness results in terms of `deriv`.
-/
variable {f₂ : 𝕜 → F} {s₂ : Set 𝕜}
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `derivWithin`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ s₂ ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderivWithin hs, and_congr_right_iff]
intro _
constructor
· rintro ⟨h', h⟩
refine ⟨h', ?_⟩
have : derivWithin f₂ s₂ = (fun u : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F => u 1) ∘ fderivWithin 𝕜 f₂ s₂ := by
ext x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
apply ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn _ h
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.isBoundedLinearMap_left _).contDiff
· rintro ⟨h', h⟩
refine ⟨h', ?_⟩
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 f₂ s₂ = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) ∘ derivWithin f₂ s₂ := by
ext x; simp [derivWithin]
simp only [this]
apply ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn _ h
have : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 fun _ : (𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) × F => _ := isBoundedBilinearMap_smulRight
exact (this.isBoundedLinearMap_right _).contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_derivWithin (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [show ∞ = ∞ + 1 by rfl, contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_derivWithin := contDiffOn_infty_iff_derivWithin
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on an open domain if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ s₂ ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂) ∧
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn]
exact Iff.rfl.and (Iff.rfl.and (contDiffOn_congr fun _ => derivWithin_of_isOpen hs))
theorem contDiffOn_infty_iff_deriv_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s₂) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ ContDiffOn 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [show ∞ = ∞ + 1 by rfl, contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen hs]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")]
alias contDiffOn_top_iff_deriv_of_isOpen := contDiffOn_infty_iff_deriv_of_isOpen
protected theorem ContDiffOn.derivWithin (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
((contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs).1 (hf.of_le hmn)).2.2
theorem ContDiffOn.deriv_of_isOpen (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : IsOpen s₂) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 m (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
(hf.derivWithin hs.uniqueDiffOn hmn).congr fun _ hx => (derivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx).symm
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_derivWithin (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s₂)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (derivWithin f₂ s₂) s₂ := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact ((contDiffOn_succ_iff_derivWithin hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuousOn
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_deriv_of_isOpen (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : IsOpen s₂)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : ContinuousOn (deriv f₂) s₂ := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact ((contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuousOn
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_succ_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 (n + 1) f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ (n = ω → AnalyticOn 𝕜 f₂ univ) ∧
ContDiff 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, contDiffOn_succ_iff_deriv_of_isOpen, isOpen_univ,
differentiableOn_univ]
theorem contDiff_one_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 1 f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ Continuous (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl, contDiff_succ_iff_deriv]
simp
theorem contDiff_infty_iff_deriv :
ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ f₂ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (∞ : WithTop ℕ∞) = ∞ + 1 from rfl, contDiff_succ_iff_deriv]
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-27")] alias contDiff_top_iff_deriv := contDiff_infty_iff_deriv
theorem ContDiff.continuous_deriv (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n f₂) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : Continuous (deriv f₂) := by
rw [show (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) = 0 + 1 from rfl] at hn
exact (contDiff_succ_iff_deriv.mp (h.of_le hn)).2.2.continuous
theorem ContDiff.iterate_deriv :
∀ (n : ℕ) {f₂ : 𝕜 → F}, ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ f₂ → ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ (deriv^[n] f₂)
| 0, _, hf => hf
| n + 1, _, hf => ContDiff.iterate_deriv n (contDiff_infty_iff_deriv.mp hf).2
theorem ContDiff.iterate_deriv' (n : ℕ) :
∀ (k : ℕ) {f₂ : 𝕜 → F}, ContDiff 𝕜 (n + k : ℕ) f₂ → ContDiff 𝕜 n (deriv^[k] f₂)
| 0, _, hf => hf
| k + 1, _, hf => ContDiff.iterate_deriv' _ k (contDiff_succ_iff_deriv.mp hf).2.2
end deriv
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 1,352 | 1,353 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightNhds
/-!
# Continuity of monotone functions
In this file we prove the following fact: if `f` is a monotone function on a neighborhood of `a`
and the image of this neighborhood is a neighborhood of `f a`, then `f` is continuous at `a`, see
`continuousWithinAt_of_monotoneOn_of_image_mem_nhds`, as well as several similar facts.
We also prove that an `OrderIso` is continuous.
## Tags
continuous, monotone
-/
open Set Filter
open Topology
section LinearOrder
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
variable [LinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β]
/-- If `f` is a function strictly monotone on a right neighborhood of `a` and the
image of this neighborhood under `f` meets every interval `(f a, b]`, `b > f a`, then `f` is
continuous at `a` from the right.
The assumption `hfs : ∀ b > f a, ∃ c ∈ s, f c ∈ Ioc (f a) b` is required because otherwise the
function `f : ℝ → ℝ` given by `f x = if x ≤ 0 then x else x + 1` would be a counter-example at
`a = 0`. -/
theorem StrictMonoOn.continuousWithinAt_right_of_exists_between {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α}
(h_mono : StrictMonoOn f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a) (hfs : ∀ b > f a, ∃ c ∈ s, f c ∈ Ioc (f a) b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
have ha : a ∈ Ici a := left_mem_Ici
have has : a ∈ s := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin ha hs
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun b hb => ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [hs, @self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ a (Ici a)] with _ hxs hxa using hb.trans_le
((h_mono.le_iff_le has hxs).2 hxa)
· rcases hfs b hb with ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩
rw [h_mono.lt_iff_lt has hcs] at hac
filter_upwards [hs, Ico_mem_nhdsGE hac]
rintro x hx ⟨_, hxc⟩
exact ((h_mono.lt_iff_lt hx hcs).2 hxc).trans_le hcb
/-- If `f` is a monotone function on a right neighborhood of `a` and the image of this neighborhood
under `f` meets every interval `(f a, b)`, `b > f a`, then `f` is continuous at `a` from the right.
The assumption `hfs : ∀ b > f a, ∃ c ∈ s, f c ∈ Ioo (f a) b` cannot be replaced by the weaker
assumption `hfs : ∀ b > f a, ∃ c ∈ s, f c ∈ Ioc (f a) b` we use for strictly monotone functions
because otherwise the function `ceil : ℝ → ℤ` would be a counter-example at `a = 0`. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_right_of_monotoneOn_of_exists_between {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α}
(h_mono : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a) (hfs : ∀ b > f a, ∃ c ∈ s, f c ∈ Ioo (f a) b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
have ha : a ∈ Ici a := left_mem_Ici
have has : a ∈ s := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin ha hs
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun b hb => ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [hs, @self_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ a (Ici a)] with _ hxs hxa using hb.trans_le
(h_mono has hxs hxa)
· rcases hfs b hb with ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩
have : a < c := not_le.1 fun h => hac.not_le <| h_mono hcs has h
filter_upwards [hs, Ico_mem_nhdsGE this]
rintro x hx ⟨_, hxc⟩
exact (h_mono hx hcs hxc.le).trans_lt hcb
/-- If a function `f` with a densely ordered codomain is monotone on a right neighborhood of `a` and
the closure of the image of this neighborhood under `f` is a right neighborhood of `f a`, then `f`
is continuous at `a` from the right. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_right_of_monotoneOn_of_closure_image_mem_nhdsWithin [DenselyOrdered β]
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h_mono : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a)
(hfs : closure (f '' s) ∈ 𝓝[≥] f a) : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
refine continuousWithinAt_right_of_monotoneOn_of_exists_between h_mono hs fun b hb => ?_
| rcases (mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset hb).1 hfs with ⟨b', ⟨hab', hbb'⟩, hb'⟩
rcases exists_between hab' with ⟨c', hc'⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 (hb' ⟨hc'.1.le, hc'.2⟩) (Ioo (f a) b') isOpen_Ioo hc' with
⟨_, hc, ⟨c, hcs, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨c, hcs, hc.1, hc.2.trans_le hbb'⟩
/-- If a function `f` with a densely ordered codomain is monotone on a right neighborhood of `a` and
the image of this neighborhood under `f` is a right neighborhood of `f a`, then `f` is continuous at
`a` from the right. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/MonotoneContinuity.lean | 81 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
/-!
# The derivative of a composition (chain rule)
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
composition of functions (the chain rule).
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f g : E → F} {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {L : Filter E}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of two functions
For composition lemmas, we put `x` explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition. -/
variable (x)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {L' : Filter F}
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L') :
HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
let eq₁ := (g'.isBigO_comp _ _).trans_isLittleO hf.isLittleO
let eq₂ := (hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hL).trans_isBigO hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| eq₂.triangle <| eq₁.congr_left fun x' => ?_
simp
/- A readable version of the previous theorem, a general form of the chain rule. -/
example {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
have :=
calc
(fun x' => g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) =o[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto le_rfl
_ =O[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.triangle ?_
calc
(fun x' : E => g' (f x' - f x) - g'.comp f' (x' - x))
_ =ᶠ[L] fun x' => g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) := Eventually.of_forall fun x' => by simp
_ =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x) := g'.isBigO_comp _ _
_ =o[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isLittleO
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
hg.comp x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp_of_tendsto {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hst : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x)) : HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hst
/-- The chain rule. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x))
(hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hf.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h : MapsTo f s t) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.differentiableWithinAt.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem fderivWithin_comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderivWithin.comp := fderivWithin_comp
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
|
/-- A version of `fderivWithin_comp` that is useful to rewrite the composition of two derivatives
into a single derivative. This version always applies, but creates a new side-goal `f x = y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_fderivWithin {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} {s : Set E} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) (v : E) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Comp.lean | 139 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Divisor Finsets
This file defines sets of divisors of a natural number. This is particularly useful as background
for defining Dirichlet convolution.
## Main Definitions
Let `n : ℕ`. All of the following definitions are in the `Nat` namespace:
* `divisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`.
* `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`, other than `n`.
* `divisorsAntidiagonal n` is the `Finset` of pairs `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`.
* `Perfect n` is true when `n` is positive and the sum of `properDivisors n` is `n`.
## Conventions
Since `0` has infinitely many divisors, none of the definitions in this file make sense for it.
Therefore we adopt the convention that `Nat.divisors 0`, `Nat.properDivisors 0`,
`Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0` and `Int.divisorsAntidiag 0` are all `∅`.
## Tags
divisors, perfect numbers
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- `divisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`. By convention, we set `divisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def divisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1) | d ∣ n}
/-- `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`, other than `n`.
By convention, we set `properDivisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 n | d ∣ n}
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number as a finset.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonal` is the finset of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`.
By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅`.
O(n). -/
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(Icc 1 n).filterMap (fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
fun x₁ x₂ (x, y) hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by aesop
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number, as a list.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonalList` is the list of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`, ordered
by increasing `a`. By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = []`.
-/
def divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) : List (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(List.range' 1 n).filterMap
(fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n.succ | d ∣ n} = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n | d ∣ n} = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := x
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, mem_filterMap, mem_Icc, one_le_iff_ne_zero,
Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, Prod.ext_iff, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨han, ⟨ha, han'⟩, rfl⟩
simp [Nat.mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, han]
omega
· rintro ⟨rfl, hab⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hab
simpa [hab.1, hab.2] using Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ hab.2.bot_lt
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_zero : divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_one : divisorsAntidiagonalList 1 = [(1, 1)] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.toFinset = n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
rw [divisorsAntidiagonalList, divisorsAntidiagonal, List.toFinset_filterMap (f_inj := by aesop),
List.toFinset_range'_1_1]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.fst < ·.fst) := by
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap fun a b c d h h' ha => ?_
rw [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h h'
simpa [← h.right, ← h'.right]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.snd > ·.snd) := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap ?_
simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, gt_iff_lt, and_imp, Prod.forall,
Prod.mk.injEq]
rintro a b _ _ _ _ ha rfl rfl hb rfl rfl hab
rwa [Nat.div_lt_div_left hn ⟨_, hb.symm⟩ ⟨_, ha.symm⟩]
lemma nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} : n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Nodup :=
have : IsIrrefl (ℕ × ℕ) (·.fst < ·.fst) := ⟨by simp⟩
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.nodup
/-- The `Finset` and `List` versions agree by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem val_divisorsAntidiagonal (n : ℕ) :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).val = divisorsAntidiagonalList n :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a.1 * a.2 = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
rw [← List.mem_toFinset, toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal]
@[simp high]
lemma swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a.swap ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList := by simp [mul_comm]
lemma reverse_divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.reverse = n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.map .swap := by
have : IsAsymm (ℕ × ℕ) (·.snd < ·.snd) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ lt_asymm⟩
refine List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ?_ sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd.reverse <|
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.map _ fun _ _ ↦ id
simp [List.reverse_perm', List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList
(nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList.map Prod.swap_injective), mul_comm]
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
rcases m with - | m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
theorem card_divisors_le_self (n : ℕ) : #n.divisors ≤ n := calc
_ ≤ #(Ico 1 (n + 1)) := by
apply card_le_card
simp only [divisors, filter_subset]
_ = n := by rw [card_Ico, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | d ∣ m} = m.divisors := by
ext k
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_divisors]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hkm⟩ ↦ ⟨hkm, ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hn hm⟩, fun ⟨hk, _⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hk.trans hm, hn⟩, hk⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem divisors_zero : divisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_zero : properDivisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_divisors : (divisors n).Nonempty ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ hn ↦ by simp [hn] at hm, fun hn ↦ ⟨1, one_mem_divisors.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma divisors_eq_empty : divisors n = ∅ ↔ n = 0 :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans nonempty_divisors.not_left
theorem properDivisors_subset_divisors : properDivisors n ⊆ divisors n :=
filter_subset_filter _ <| Ico_subset_Ico_right n.le_succ
@[simp]
theorem divisors_one : divisors 1 = {1} := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_one : properDivisors 1 = ∅ := by rw [properDivisors, Ico_self, filter_empty]
theorem pos_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.divisors) : 0 < m := by
cases m
· rw [mem_divisors, zero_dvd_iff (a := n)] at h
cases h.2 h.1
apply Nat.succ_pos
theorem pos_of_mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 0 < m :=
pos_of_mem_divisors (properDivisors_subset_divisors h)
theorem one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt : 1 ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, and_iff_right (one_dvd _)]
@[simp]
lemma sup_divisors_id (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sup id = n := by
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ divisor_le) ?_
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· apply zero_le
· exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) <| mem_divisors_self n hn
lemma one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 1 < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (pos_of_mem_properDivisors h) (mem_properDivisors.1 h).2
lemma one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) :
1 < n / m := by
obtain ⟨h_dvd, h_lt⟩ := mem_properDivisors.mp h
rwa [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt' h_dvd, mul_one]
/-- See also `Nat.mem_properDivisors`. -/
lemma mem_properDivisors_iff_exists {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
m ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ ∃ k > 1, n = m * k := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨n / m, one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors h, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_properDivisors.mp h).1).symm
· rintro ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hn
exact mem_properDivisors.mpr ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn.1) hk⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_properDivisors : n.properDivisors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n :=
⟨fun ⟨_m, hm⟩ ↦ one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors hm, fun hn ↦
⟨1, one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma properDivisors_eq_empty : n.properDivisors = ∅ ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_properDivisors, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_zero : divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_one : divisorsAntidiagonal 1 = {(1, 1)} := by
ext
simp [mul_eq_one, Prod.ext_iff]
@[simp high]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.swap ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm, Prod.swap]
/-- `Nat.swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal` with the LHS in simp normal form. -/
@[deprecated swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal_aux {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.snd * x.fst = n ∧ ¬n = 0 ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm]
lemma prodMk_mem_divisorsAntidiag {x y : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(x, y) ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal ↔ x * y = n := by simp [hn]
theorem fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.fst ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro _ h.1, h.2]
theorem snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.snd ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro_left _ h.1, h.2]
@[simp]
theorem map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding = divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, Equiv.coe_prodComm,
Set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
ext
exact swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.fst = divisors n := by
ext
simp [Dvd.dvd, @eq_comm _ n (_ * _)]
@[simp]
theorem image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.snd = divisors n := by
rw [← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, map_eq_image, image_image]
exact image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
theorem map_div_right_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (d, n / d), fun _ _ => congr_arg Prod.fst⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
ext ⟨d, nd⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_divisors,
Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, hn⟩, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt]
exact ⟨rfl, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨dvd_mul_right _ _, hn⟩, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt⟩
theorem map_div_left_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (n / d, d), fun _ _ => congr_arg Prod.snd⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
apply Finset.map_injective (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding
ext
rw [map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, ← map_div_right_divisors, Finset.map_map]
simp
theorem sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self :
∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = (∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i) + n := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn, Finset.sum_cons, add_comm]
/-- `n : ℕ` is perfect if and only the sum of the proper divisors of `n` is `n` and `n`
is positive. -/
def Perfect (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n ∧ 0 < n
theorem perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors (h : 0 < n) : Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n :=
and_iff_left h
theorem perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul (h : 0 < n) :
Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = 2 * n := by
rw [perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors h, sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self, two_mul]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· apply add_right_cancel h
theorem mem_divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ divisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ j ≤ k, x = p ^ j := by
rw [mem_divisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, and_iff_left (ne_of_gt (pow_pos pp.pos k))]
theorem Prime.divisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : divisors p = {1, p} := by
ext
rw [mem_divisors, dvd_prime pp, and_iff_left pp.ne_zero, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
theorem Prime.properDivisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : properDivisors p = {1} := by
rw [← erase_insert properDivisors.not_self_mem, insert_self_properDivisors pp.ne_zero,
pp.divisors, pair_comm, erase_insert fun con => pp.ne_one (mem_singleton.1 con)]
theorem divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) :
divisors (p ^ k) = (Finset.range (k + 1)).map ⟨(p ^ ·), Nat.pow_right_injective pp.two_le⟩ := by
ext a
rw [mem_divisors_prime_pow pp]
simp [Nat.lt_succ, eq_comm]
theorem divisors_injective : Function.Injective divisors :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective sup_divisors_id
@[simp]
theorem divisors_inj {a b : ℕ} : a.divisors = b.divisors ↔ a = b :=
divisors_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum {s : Finset ℕ} (hsub : s ⊆ n.properDivisors) :
((∑ x ∈ s, x) = ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) → s = n.properDivisors := by
cases n
· rw [properDivisors_zero, subset_empty] at hsub
simp [hsub]
classical
rw [← sum_sdiff hsub]
intro h
apply Subset.antisymm hsub
rw [← sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
contrapose h
rw [← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h
apply ne_of_lt
rw [← zero_add (∑ x ∈ s, x), ← add_assoc, add_zero]
apply add_lt_add_right
have hlt :=
sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty h fun x hx => pos_of_mem_properDivisors (sdiff_subset hx)
simp only [sum_const_zero] at hlt
apply hlt
theorem sum_properDivisors_dvd (h : (∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) ∣ n) :
∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = 1 ∨ ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp
· rcases n with - | n
· simp at h
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro ne_n
have hlt : ∑ x ∈ n.succ.succ.properDivisors, x < n.succ.succ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos _) h) ne_n
symm
rw [← mem_singleton, eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum (singleton_subset_iff.2
(mem_properDivisors.2 ⟨h, hlt⟩)) (sum_singleton _ _), mem_properDivisors]
exact ⟨one_dvd _, Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos _)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Prime.prod_properDivisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.properDivisors, f x = f 1 := by simp [h.properDivisors]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Prime.prod_divisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.divisors, f x = f p * f 1 := by
rw [← cons_self_properDivisors h.ne_zero, prod_cons, h.prod_properDivisors]
theorem properDivisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime : n.properDivisors = {1} ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
refine Nat.prime_def.mpr ⟨?_, fun m hdvd => ?_⟩
· match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| 1 => contradiction
| Nat.succ (Nat.succ n) => simp [succ_le_succ]
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← h, mem_properDivisors]
have := Nat.le_of_dvd ?_ hdvd
· simpa [hdvd, this] using (le_iff_eq_or_lt.mp this).symm
· by_contra!
simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp this, this] at h
contradiction
· exact fun h => Prime.properDivisors h
theorem sum_properDivisors_eq_one_iff_prime : ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp [Nat.not_prime_zero]
· cases n
· simp [Nat.not_prime_one]
· rw [← properDivisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sum_singleton _ _⟩
rw [@eq_comm (Finset ℕ) _ _]
apply
eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum
(singleton_subset_iff.2
(one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 (succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos _))))
((sum_singleton _ _).trans h.symm)
theorem mem_properDivisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ properDivisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ (j : ℕ) (_ : j < k), x = p ^ j := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, ← exists_and_right]
simp only [exists_prop, and_assoc]
apply exists_congr
intro a
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨_h_left, rfl, h_right⟩
rw [Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt] at h_right
exact ⟨h_right, rfl⟩
· rcases h with ⟨h_left, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt]
simp [h_left, le_of_lt]
theorem properDivisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) :
properDivisors (p ^ k) = (Finset.range k).map ⟨(p ^ ·), Nat.pow_right_injective pp.two_le⟩ := by
ext a
simp only [mem_properDivisors, Nat.isUnit_iff, mem_map, mem_range, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk,
pow_eq]
have := mem_properDivisors_prime_pow pp k (x := a)
rw [mem_properDivisors] at this
rw [this]
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h; rcases h with ⟨j, hj, hap⟩; use j; tauto
· tauto
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_properDivisors_prime_pow {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {k p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α}
(h : p.Prime) : (∏ x ∈ (p ^ k).properDivisors, f x) = ∏ x ∈ range k, f (p ^ x) := by
simp [h, properDivisors_prime_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) sum_divisors_prime_pow]
theorem prod_divisors_prime_pow {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {k p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
(∏ x ∈ (p ^ k).divisors, f x) = ∏ x ∈ range (k + 1), f (p ^ x) := by
simp [h, divisors_prime_pow]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_divisorsAntidiagonal {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) {n : ℕ} :
∏ i ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, f i.1 i.2 = ∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f i (n / i) := by
rw [← map_div_right_divisors, Finset.prod_map]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_divisorsAntidiagonal' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) {n : ℕ} :
∏ i ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal, f i.1 i.2 = ∏ i ∈ n.divisors, f (n / i) i := by
rw [← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, Finset.prod_map]
exact prod_divisorsAntidiagonal fun i j => f j i
/-- The factors of `n` are the prime divisors -/
theorem primeFactors_eq_to_filter_divisors_prime (n : ℕ) :
n.primeFactors = {p ∈ divisors n | p.Prime} := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
| · ext q
simpa [hn, hn.ne', mem_primeFactorsList] using and_comm
lemma primeFactors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hmn : m ∣ n) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 546 | 549 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Continuous
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Dual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfLIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ring
/-! # From equality of integrals to equality of functions
This file provides various statements of the general form "if two functions have the same integral
on all sets, then they are equal almost everywhere".
The different lemmas use various hypotheses on the class of functions, on the target space or on the
possible finiteness of the measure.
This file is about Bochner integrals. See the file `AEEqOfLIntegral` for Lebesgue integrals.
## Main statements
All results listed below apply to two functions `f, g`, together with two main hypotheses,
* `f` and `g` are integrable on all measurable sets with finite measure,
* for all measurable sets `s` with finite measure, `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ`.
The conclusion is then `f =ᵐ[μ] g`. The main lemmas are:
* `ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite`: case of a sigma-finite measure.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for functions which are
`AEFinStronglyMeasurable`.
* `Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for elements of `Lp`, for `0 < p < ∞`.
* `Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: for integrable functions.
For each of these results, we also provide a lemma about the equality of one function and 0. For
example, `Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero`.
Generally useful lemmas which are not related to integrals:
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner`: if for all constants `c`, `fun x => inner c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then
`f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
* `ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual`: if for all constants `c` in the dual space,
`fun x => c (f x) =ᵐ[μ] 0` then `f =ᵐ[μ] 0`.
-/
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace NormedSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
section AeEqOfForall
variable {α E 𝕜 : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [RCLike 𝕜]
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_inner [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : E, (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let s := denseSeq E
have hs : DenseRange s := denseRange_denseSeq E
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, inner (s n) (f x) = (0 : 𝕜) := ae_all_iff.mpr fun n => hf (s n)
refine hf'.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have h_closed : IsClosed {c : E | inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)} :=
isClosed_eq (continuous_id.inner continuous_const) continuous_const
exact @isClosed_property ℕ E _ s (fun c => inner c (f x) = (0 : 𝕜)) hs h_closed hx _
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => y x
variable (𝕜)
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{t : Set E} (ht : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) {f : α → E}
(hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) (h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases ht with ⟨d, d_count, hd⟩
haveI : Encodable d := d_count.toEncodable
have : ∀ x : d, ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ‖g‖ ≤ 1 ∧ g x = ‖(x : E)‖ :=
fun x => exists_dual_vector'' 𝕜 (x : E)
choose s hs using this
have A : ∀ a : E, a ∈ t → (∀ x, ⟪a, s x⟫ = (0 : 𝕜)) → a = 0 := by
intro a hat ha
contrapose! ha
have a_pos : 0 < ‖a‖ := by simp only [ha, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
have a_mem : a ∈ closure d := hd hat
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : d, dist a x < ‖a‖ / 2 := by
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 a_mem (‖a‖ / 2) (half_pos a_pos) with ⟨x, h'x, hx⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h'x⟩, hx⟩
use x
have I : ‖a‖ / 2 < ‖(x : E)‖ := by
have : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖(x : E)‖ + ‖a - x‖ := norm_le_insert' _ _
have : ‖a - x‖ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rwa [dist_eq_norm] at hx
linarith
intro h
apply lt_irrefl ‖s x x‖
calc
‖s x x‖ = ‖s x (x - a)‖ := by simp only [h, sub_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_sub]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖(x : E) - a‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (hs x).1 _
_ < ‖a‖ / 2 := by rw [one_mul]; rwa [dist_eq_norm'] at hx
_ < ‖(x : E)‖ := I
_ = ‖s x x‖ := by rw [(hs x).2, RCLike.norm_coe_norm]
have hfs : ∀ y : d, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := fun y => hf (s y)
have hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ y : d, ⟪f x, s y⟫ = (0 : 𝕜) := by rwa [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [hf', h't] with x hx h'x
exact A (f x) h'x hx
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ c : Dual 𝕜 E, (fun x => ⟪f x, c⟫) =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable 𝕜 (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hf
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_univ _)
variable {𝕜}
end AeEqOfForall
variable {α E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section AeEqOfForallSetIntegralEq
section Real
variable {f : α → ℝ}
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
simp_rw [EventuallyLE, Pi.zero_apply]
rw [ae_const_le_iff_forall_lt_measure_zero]
intro b hb_neg
let s := {x | f x ≤ b}
have hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ := nullMeasurableSet_le hf.1.aemeasurable aemeasurable_const
have mus : μ s < ∞ := Integrable.measure_le_lt_top hf hb_neg
have h_int_gt : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ b * μ.real s := by
have h_const_le : (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ _ in s, b ∂μ := by
refine setIntegral_mono_ae_restrict hf.integrableOn (integrableOn_const.mpr (Or.inr mus)) ?_
rw [EventuallyLE, ae_restrict_iff₀ (hs.mono μ.restrict_le_self)]
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x hxs => hxs
rwa [setIntegral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm] at h_const_le
contrapose! h_int_gt with H
calc
b * μ.real s < 0 := mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hb_neg <| ENNReal.toReal_pos H mus.ne
_ ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← μ.restrict_toMeasurable mus.ne]
exact hf_zero _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable ..) (by rwa [measure_toMeasurable])
theorem ae_le_of_forall_setIntegral_le {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf_le : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← eventually_sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (hg.sub hf) fun s hs => ?_
rw [integral_sub' hg.integrableOn hf.integrableOn, sub_nonneg]
exact hf_le s hs
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter {f : α → ℝ} {t : Set α}
(hf : IntegrableOn f t μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ (s ∩ t) < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ) :
0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf fun s hs h's => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
apply hf_zero s hs
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at h's
theorem ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
apply ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict
intro t t_meas t_lt_top
apply ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter (hf_int_finite t t_meas t_lt_top)
intro s s_meas _
exact
hf_zero _ (s_meas.inter t_meas)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (Set.inter_subset_right)) t_lt_top)
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl.symm.le
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine
ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_of_sigmaFinite (fun s hs hμts => ?_) fun s hs hμts => ?_
· rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_int_finite (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
· rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμts
exact hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμts
theorem ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → 0 ≤ ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f := by
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg_inter
(hf_int_finite t ht (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)) fun s hs _ => ?_
refine hf_zero (s ∩ t) (hs.inter ht) ?_
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_right).trans_lt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hμt)
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real {f : α → ℝ}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
suffices h_and : f ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 ∧ 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] f from
h_and.1.mp (h_and.2.mono fun x hx1 hx2 => le_antisymm hx2 hx1)
refine
⟨?_,
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg hf_int_finite
(fun s hs hμs => (hf_zero s hs hμs).symm.le) ht hμt⟩
suffices h_neg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict t] -f by
refine h_neg.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.neg_apply] at hx
simpa using hx
refine
ae_nonneg_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg (fun s hs hμs => (hf_int_finite s hs hμs).neg)
(fun s hs hμs => ?_) ht hμt
simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply]
rw [integral_neg, neg_nonneg]
exact (hf_zero s hs hμs).le
end Real
theorem ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 := by
rcases (hf_int_finite t ht hμt.lt_top).aestronglyMeasurable.isSeparable_ae_range with
⟨u, u_sep, hu⟩
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_dual_of_isSeparable ℝ u_sep (fun c => ?_) hu
refine ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero_real ?_ ?_ ht hμt
· intro s hs hμs
exact ContinuousLinearMap.integrable_comp c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs)
· intro s hs hμs
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm c (hf_int_finite s hs hμs), hf_zero s hs hμs]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero _
theorem ae_eq_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg' : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)]
exact sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_zero s hs hμs)
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg' ht hμt
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let S := spanningSets μ
rw [← @Measure.restrict_univ _ _ μ, ← iUnion_spanningSets μ, EventuallyEq, ae_iff,
Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion (measurableSet_spanningSets μ))]
rw [Set.inter_iUnion, measure_iUnion_null_iff]
intro n
have h_meas_n : MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets μ n
have hμn : μ (S n) < ∞ := measure_spanningSets_lt_top μ n
rw [← Measure.restrict_apply' h_meas_n]
exact ae_eq_zero_restrict_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero h_meas_n hμn.ne
theorem ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite [SigmaFinite μ] {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite hfg_int hfg
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
let t := hf.sigmaFiniteSet
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this hf.ae_eq_zero_compl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := hf.sigmaFinite_restrict
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict hs]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply hs] at hμs
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter hf.measurableSet) hμs
theorem AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq {f g : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ)
(hf : AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEFinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' (hf_int_finite s hs hμs) (hg_int_finite s hs hμs),
sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg_eq s hs hμs)]
have hfg_int : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun s hs hμs =>
(hf_int_finite s hs hμs).sub (hg_int_finite s hs hμs)
exact (hf.sub hg).ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hfg_int hfg
theorem Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (f : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero hf_int_finite hf_zero
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
theorem Lp.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (f g : Lp E p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞)
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
AEFinStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hf_int_finite hg_int_finite hfg
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
(Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).aefinStronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_finStronglyMeasurable_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → E}
(hf_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0)
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
obtain ⟨t, ht_meas, htf_zero, htμ⟩ := hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite
haveI : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict t).trim hm) := by rwa [restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas] at htμ
have htf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0 := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' (MeasurableSet.compl (hm _ ht_meas))]
exact Eventually.of_forall htf_zero
have hf_meas_m : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := hf.stronglyMeasurable
suffices f =ᵐ[μ.restrict t] 0 from
ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl _ this htf_zero
refine measure_eq_zero_of_trim_eq_zero hm ?_
refine ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite ?_ ?_
· intro s hs hμs
unfold IntegrableOn
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
refine Integrable.trim hm ?_ hf_meas_m
exact hf_int_finite _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
· intro s hs hμs
rw [restrict_trim hm (μ.restrict t) hs, Measure.restrict_restrict (hm s hs)]
rw [← restrict_trim hm μ ht_meas, Measure.restrict_apply hs,
trim_measurableSet_eq hm (hs.inter ht_meas)] at hμs
rw [← integral_trim hm hf_meas_m]
exact hf_zero _ (hs.inter ht_meas) hμs
theorem Integrable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero {f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hf_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
have hf_Lp : MemLp f 1 μ := memLp_one_iff_integrable.mpr hf
let f_Lp := hf_Lp.toLp f
have hf_f_Lp : f =ᵐ[μ] f_Lp := (MemLp.coeFn_toLp hf_Lp).symm
refine hf_f_Lp.trans ?_
refine Lp.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero f_Lp one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top ?_ ?_
· exact fun s _ _ => Integrable.integrableOn (L1.integrable_coeFn _)
· intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae hf_f_Lp.symm)]
exact hf_zero s hs hμs
theorem Integrable.ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (f g : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ)
(hfg : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ) :
f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero]
have hfg' : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → (∫ x in s, (f - g) x ∂μ) = 0 := by
intro s hs hμs
rw [integral_sub' hf.integrableOn hg.integrableOn]
exact sub_eq_zero.mpr (hfg s hs hμs)
exact Integrable.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (hf.sub hg) hfg'
variable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
/-- If an integrable function has zero integral on all closed sets, then it is zero
almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isClosed_eq_zero {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsClosed s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
suffices ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 from
hf.ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_zero (fun s hs _ ↦ this s hs)
have A : ∀ (t : Set β), MeasurableSet t → ∫ (x : β) in t, f x ∂μ = 0
→ ∫ (x : β) in tᶜ, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
intro t t_meas ht
have I : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by rw [← setIntegral_univ]; exact h'f _ isClosed_univ
simpa [ht, I] using integral_add_compl t_meas hf
intro s hs
induction s, hs using MeasurableSet.induction_on_open with
| isOpen U hU => exact compl_compl U ▸ A _ hU.measurableSet.compl (h'f _ hU.isClosed_compl)
| compl s hs ihs => exact A s hs ihs
| iUnion g g_disj g_meas hg => simp [integral_iUnion g_meas g_disj hf.integrableOn, hg]
/-- If an integrable function has zero integral on all compact sets in a sigma-compact space, then
it is zero almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero
[SigmaCompactSpace β] [R1Space β] {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsCompact s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
apply ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isClosed_eq_zero hf (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
let t : ℕ → Set β := fun n ↦ closure (compactCovering β n) ∩ s
suffices H : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x in t n, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) by
have A : ∀ n, ∫ x in t n, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
fun n ↦ h'f _ ((isCompact_compactCovering β n).closure.inter_right hs)
simp_rw [A, tendsto_const_nhds_iff] at H
exact H.symm
have B : s = ⋃ n, t n := by
rw [← Set.iUnion_inter, iUnion_closure_compactCovering, Set.univ_inter]
rw [B]
apply tendsto_setIntegral_of_monotone
· intros n
exact (isClosed_closure.inter hs).measurableSet
· intros m n hmn
simp only [t, Set.le_iff_subset]
gcongr
· exact hf.integrableOn
/-- If a locally integrable function has zero integral on all compact sets in a sigma-compact space,
then it is zero almost everywhere. -/
lemma ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero'
[SigmaCompactSpace β] [R1Space β] {μ : Measure β} {f : β → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(h'f : ∀ (s : Set β), IsCompact s → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← μ.restrict_univ, ← iUnion_closure_compactCovering]
apply (ae_restrict_iUnion_iff _ _).2 (fun n ↦ ?_)
apply ae_eq_zero_of_forall_setIntegral_isCompact_eq_zero
· exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact (isCompact_compactCovering β n).closure
· intro s hs
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict' measurableSet_closure]
| exact h'f _ (hs.inter_right isClosed_closure)
end AeEqOfForallSetIntegralEq
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqOfIntegral.lean | 433 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
-/
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
variable (m n : ℕ) (x y : List α) (a b : Stream' α)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
@[simp] protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : head s :: tail s = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- Alias for `Stream'.eta` to match `List` API. -/
alias cons_head_tail := Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (m + n) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
rfl
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (m + n) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem get_tail {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i + 1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {i : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i + 1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
theorem get_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x :: s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma get_cons_append_zero {a : α} {x : List α} {s : Stream' α} :
(a :: x ++ₛ s).get 0 = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma append_eq_cons {a : α} {as : Stream' α} : [a] ++ₛ as = a :: as := by rfl
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : ℕ) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : ℕ) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : ℕ) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} :
∀ n, s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| 0, h => bisim h
| n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} : s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a :: corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1 :: corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a :: unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, _, _ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]
rfl
theorem even_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (s : Stream' α) : even (a₁::a₂::s) = a₁::even s := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]; rfl
theorem even_tail (s : Stream' α) : even (tail s) = odd s :=
rfl
theorem even_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : even (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁' s₁ => ∃ s₂, s₁' = even (s₁ ⋈ s₂))
(fun s₁' s₁ ⟨s₂, h₁⟩ => by
rw [h₁]
constructor
· rfl
· exact ⟨tail s₂, by rw [interleave_eq, even_cons_cons, tail_cons]⟩)
(Exists.intro s₂ rfl)
theorem interleave_even_odd (s₁ : Stream' α) : even s₁ ⋈ odd s₁ = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s' s => s' = even s ⋈ odd s)
(fun s' s (h : s' = even s ⋈ odd s) => by
rw [h]; constructor
· rfl
· simp [odd_eq, odd_eq, tail_interleave, tail_even])
rfl
theorem get_even : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (even s) n = get s (2 * n)
| 0, _ => rfl
| succ n, s => by
change get (even s) (succ n) = get s (succ (succ (2 * n)))
| rw [get_succ, get_succ, tail_even, get_even n]; rfl
theorem get_odd : ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α), get (odd s) n = get s (2 * n + 1) := fun n s => by
rw [odd_eq, get_even]; rfl
theorem mem_of_mem_even (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ even s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_even])
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 430 | 437 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,039 | 1,040 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
/-!
# The canonical topology on a category
We define the finest (largest) Grothendieck topology for which a given presheaf `P` is a sheaf.
This is well defined since if `P` is a sheaf for a topology `J`, then it is a sheaf for any
coarser (smaller) topology. Nonetheless we define the topology explicitly by specifying its sieves:
A sieve `S` on `X` is covering for `finestTopologySingle P` iff
for any `f : Y ⟶ X`, `P` satisfies the sheaf axiom for `S.pullback f`.
Showing that this is a genuine Grothendieck topology (namely that it satisfies the transitivity
axiom) forms the bulk of this file.
This generalises to a set of presheaves, giving the topology `finestTopology Ps` which is the
finest topology for which every presheaf in `Ps` is a sheaf.
Using `Ps` as the set of representable presheaves defines the `canonicalTopology`: the finest
topology for which every representable is a sheaf.
A Grothendieck topology is called `Subcanonical` if it is smaller than the canonical topology,
equivalently it is subcanonical iff every representable presheaf is a sheaf.
## References
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/canonical+topology
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/subcanonical+coverage
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z9
* https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
namespace Sheaf
variable {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v} {X : C} (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
/--
To show `P` is a sheaf for the binding of `U` with `B`, it suffices to show that `P` is a sheaf for
`U`, that `P` is a sheaf for each sieve in `B`, and that it is separated for any pullback of any
sieve in `B`.
This is mostly an auxiliary lemma to show `isSheafFor_trans`.
Adapted from [Elephant], Lemma C2.1.7(i) with suggestions as mentioned in
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709/
-/
theorem isSheafFor_bind (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v) (U : Sieve X) (B : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, U f → Sieve Y)
(hU : Presieve.IsSheafFor P (U : Presieve X))
(hB : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), Presieve.IsSheafFor P (B hf : Presieve Y))
(hB' : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (h : U f) ⦃Z⦄ (g : Z ⟶ Y),
Presieve.IsSeparatedFor P (((B h).pullback g) : Presieve Z)) :
| Presieve.IsSheafFor P (Sieve.bind (U : Presieve X) B : Presieve X) := by
intro s hs
let y : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), Presieve.FamilyOfElements P (B hf : Presieve Y) :=
fun Y f hf Z g hg => s _ (Presieve.bind_comp _ _ hg)
have hy : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), (y hf).Compatible := by
intro Y f H Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
apply hs
apply reassoc_of% comm
let t : Presieve.FamilyOfElements P (U : Presieve X) :=
fun Y f hf => (hB hf).amalgamate (y hf) (hy hf)
have ht : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (hf : U f), (y hf).IsAmalgamation (t f hf) := fun Y f hf =>
(hB hf).isAmalgamation _
have hT : t.Compatible := by
rw [Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Z W f h hf
apply (hB (U.downward_closed hf h)).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y l hl
apply (hB' hf (l ≫ h)).ext
intro M m hm
have : bind U B (m ≫ l ≫ h ≫ f) := by simpa using (Presieve.bind_comp f hf hm : bind U B _)
trans s (m ≫ l ≫ h ≫ f) this
· have := ht (U.downward_closed hf h) _ ((B _).downward_closed hl m)
rw [op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply] at this
rw [this]
change s _ _ = s _ _
-- Porting note: the proof was `by simp`
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
· have h : s _ _ = _ := (ht hf _ hm).symm
-- Porting note: this was done by `simp only [assoc] at`
conv_lhs at h => congr; rw [assoc, assoc]
rw [h]
simp only [op_comp, assoc, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
refine ⟨hU.amalgamate t hT, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro Z _ ⟨Y, f, g, hg, hf, rfl⟩
rw [op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ hg]
apply ht hg _ hf
· intro y hy
apply hU.isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Y f hf
apply (hB hf).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro Z g hg
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hy _ (Presieve.bind_comp _ _ hg),
hU.valid_glue _ _ hf, ht hf _ hg]
/-- Given two sieves `R` and `S`, to show that `P` is a sheaf for `S`, we can show:
* `P` is a sheaf for `R`
* `P` is a sheaf for the pullback of `S` along any arrow in `R`
* `P` is separated for the pullback of `R` along any arrow in `S`.
This is mostly an auxiliary lemma to construct `finestTopology`.
Adapted from [Elephant], Lemma C2.1.7(ii) with suggestions as mentioned in
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/358709
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Canonical.lean | 61 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniel Roca González. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Daniel Roca González
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
/-!
# The Lax-Milgram Theorem
We consider a Hilbert space `V` over `ℝ`
equipped with a bounded bilinear form `B : V →L[ℝ] V →L[ℝ] ℝ`.
Recall that a bilinear form `B : V →L[ℝ] V →L[ℝ] ℝ` is *coercive*
iff `∃ C, (0 < C) ∧ ∀ u, C * ‖u‖ * ‖u‖ ≤ B u u`.
Under the hypothesis that `B` is coercive we prove the Lax-Milgram theorem:
that is, the map `InnerProductSpace.continuousLinearMapOfBilin` from
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual` can be upgraded to a continuous equivalence
`IsCoercive.continuousLinearEquivOfBilin : V ≃L[ℝ] V`.
## References
* We follow the notes of Peter Howard's Spring 2020 *M612: Partial Differential Equations* lecture,
see[howard]
## Tags
dual, Lax-Milgram
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike LinearMap ContinuousLinearMap InnerProductSpace
open LinearMap (ker range)
open RealInnerProductSpace NNReal
universe u
namespace IsCoercive
variable {V : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [CompleteSpace V]
variable {B : V →L[ℝ] V →L[ℝ] ℝ}
local postfix:1024 "♯" => continuousLinearMapOfBilin (𝕜 := ℝ)
theorem bounded_below (coercive : IsCoercive B) : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ v, C * ‖v‖ ≤ ‖B♯ v‖ := by
rcases coercive with ⟨C, C_ge_0, coercivity⟩
refine ⟨C, C_ge_0, ?_⟩
intro v
by_cases h : 0 < ‖v‖
· refine (mul_le_mul_right h).mp ?_
calc
C * ‖v‖ * ‖v‖ ≤ B v v := coercivity v
_ = ⟪B♯ v, v⟫_ℝ := (continuousLinearMapOfBilin_apply B v v).symm
_ ≤ ‖B♯ v‖ * ‖v‖ := real_inner_le_norm (B♯ v) v
· have : v = 0 := by simpa using h
simp [this]
theorem antilipschitz (coercive : IsCoercive B) : ∃ C : ℝ≥0, 0 < C ∧ AntilipschitzWith C B♯ := by
rcases coercive.bounded_below with ⟨C, C_pos, below_bound⟩
refine ⟨C⁻¹.toNNReal, Real.toNNReal_pos.mpr (inv_pos.mpr C_pos), ?_⟩
| refine ContinuousLinearMap.antilipschitz_of_bound B♯ ?_
simp_rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', max_eq_left_of_lt (inv_pos.mpr C_pos), ←
inv_mul_le_iff₀ (inv_pos.mpr C_pos)]
simpa using below_bound
theorem ker_eq_bot (coercive : IsCoercive B) : ker B♯ = ⊥ := by
rw [LinearMapClass.ker_eq_bot]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/LaxMilgram.lean | 65 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
| List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 213 | 218 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Left Homology of short complexes
Given a short complex `S : ShortComplex C`, which consists of two composable
maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`, we shall define
here the "left homology" `S.leftHomology` of `S`. For this, we introduce the
notion of "left homology data". Such an `h : S.LeftHomologyData` consists of the
data of morphisms `i : K ⟶ X₂` and `π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies
`K` with the kernel of `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃`, and that `π` identifies `H` with the cokernel
of the induced map `f' : X₁ ⟶ K`.
When such a `S.LeftHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasLeftHomology]`
and we define `S.leftHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen left homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.cycles` to be the `K` field.
The dual notion is defined in `RightHomologyData.lean`. In `Homology.lean`,
when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data (i.e. they give
the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define `[S.HasHomology]`
and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` and
`π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies `K` to the kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`,
and that `π` identifies `H` to the cokernel of the induced map `f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
structure LeftHomologyData where
/-- a choice of kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
K : C
/-- a choice of cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
H : C
/-- the inclusion of cycles in `S.X₂` -/
i : K ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the projection from cycles to the (left) homology -/
π : K ⟶ H
/-- the kernel condition for `i` -/
wi : i ≫ S.g = 0
/-- `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` is a kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi)
/-- the cokernel condition for `π` -/
wπ : hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι _ S.zero) ≫ π = 0
/-- `π : K ⟶ H` is a cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ π wπ)
initialize_simps_projections LeftHomologyData (-hi, -hπ)
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- The chosen kernels and cokernels of the limits API give a `LeftHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kernel S.g
H := cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)
i := kernel.ι _
π := cokernel.π _
wi := kernel.condition _
hi := kernelIsKernel _
wπ := cokernel.condition _
hπ := cokernelIsCokernel _
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wi wπ
variable {S}
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Mono h.i := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hi⟩
instance : Epi h.π := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hπ⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` that is a cycle (i.e. `k ≫ S.g = 0`) lifts
to a morphism `A ⟶ K` -/
def liftK (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.K := h.hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftK_i (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : h.liftK k hk ≫ h.i = k :=
h.hi.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.zero
/-- The (left) homology class `A ⟶ H` attached to a cycle `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` -/
@[simp]
def liftH (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.H := h.liftK k hk ≫ h.π
/-- Given `h : LeftHomologyData S`, this is morphism `S.X₁ ⟶ h.K` induced
by `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the fact that `h.K` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K := h.liftK S.f S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_i : h.f' ≫ h.i = S.f := liftK_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_π : h.f' ≫ h.π = 0 := h.wπ
@[reassoc]
lemma liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
h.liftK k (by rw [hx, assoc, S.zero, comp_zero]) ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = (x ≫ h.f') ≫ h.π by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, hx, liftK_i, assoc, f'_i]
/-- For `h : S.LeftHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hπ`, saying that
`π : h.K ⟶ h.H` is a cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
def hπ' : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ h.π h.f'_π) := h.hπ
/-- The morphism `H ⟶ A` induced by a morphism `k : K ⟶ A` such that `f' ≫ k = 0` -/
def descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.hπ.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.π ≫ h.descH k hk = k :=
h.hπ.fac (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk) WalkingParallelPair.one
lemma isIso_i (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.i :=
⟨h.liftK (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hg, id_comp]),
by simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, id_comp, assoc, liftK_i, comp_id], liftK_i _ _ _⟩
lemma isIso_π (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.π := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' h.hπ' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_mono h.i, comp_id, f'_i, zero_comp, hf])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, hφ, by rw [← cancel_epi h.π, reassoc_of% hφ, comp_id]⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := c.pt
i := 𝟙 _
π := c.π
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := CokernelCofork.condition _
hπ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).f' = S.f := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).i, f'_i,
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_i]
dsimp
rw [comp_id]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := c.pt
H := c.pt
i := c.ι
π := 𝟙 _
wi := KernelFork.condition _
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
wπ := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf])
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ (Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
(ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).i, f'_i, hf, zero_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a left homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
i := 𝟙 _
π := 𝟙 _
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := by
change S.f ≫ 𝟙 _ = 0
simp only [hf, zero_comp]
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
@[simp] lemma ofZeros_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((ofZeros S hf hg).i), zero_comp, f'_i, hf]
end LeftHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has left homology when there exists a `S.LeftHomologyData` -/
class HasLeftHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.LeftHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.LeftHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has left homology -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyData [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.LeftHomologyData := HasLeftHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasLeftHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : HasLeftHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasKernel_of_hasCokernel [HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.HasLeftHomology := HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasLeftHomology
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- Given left homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `LeftHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `K` (cycles)
and `H` (left homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure LeftHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on cycles -/
φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K
/-- the induced map on left homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `i` -/
commi : φK ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `f'` -/
commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `π` -/
commπ : h₁.π ≫ φH = φK ≫ h₂.π := by aesop_cat
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commi commf' commπ
/-- The left homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
LeftHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φK := 0
φH := 0
/-- The left homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of left homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
LeftHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φK := ψ.φK ≫ ψ'.φK
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hK : ψ₁.φK = ψ₂.φK := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, commi, commi]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.π, commπ, commπ, hK]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := h₂.liftK (h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂)
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm₂₃, h₁.wi_assoc, zero_comp])
have commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, assoc, LeftHomologyData.liftK_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i, φ.comm₁₂]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₁.descH (φK ≫ h₂.π)
(by rw [reassoc_of% commf', h₂.f'_π, comp_zero])
exact ⟨φK, φH, by simp [φK], commf', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φK {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φK = γ₂.φK := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on left homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commπ := comm.symm
commf' := by simp only [LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f', φ.comm₁₂]
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := f
φH := f
commi := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := c.π
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data
`LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φK := c.ι
φH := c.ι
end LeftHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The left homology of a short complex, given by the `H` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def leftHomology : C := S.leftHomologyData.H
-- `S.leftHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma leftHomologyData_H : S.leftHomologyData.H = S.leftHomology := rfl
/-- The cycles of a short complex, given by the `K` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def cycles : C := S.leftHomologyData.K
/-- The "homology class" map `S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyπ : S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology := S.leftHomologyData.π
/-- The inclusion `S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂ := S.leftHomologyData.i
/-- The "boundaries" map `S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles`. (Note that in this homology API, we make no use
of the "image" of this morphism, which under some categorical assumptions would be a subobject
of `S.X₂` contained in `S.cycles`.) -/
noncomputable def toCycles : S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles := S.leftHomologyData.f'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_g : S.iCycles ≫ S.g = 0 := S.leftHomologyData.wi
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i : S.toCycles ≫ S.iCycles = S.f := S.leftHomologyData.f'_i
instance : Mono S.iCycles := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi S.leftHomologyπ := by
dsimp only [leftHomologyπ]
infer_instance
lemma leftHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma leftHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A)
(h : S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [leftHomology_ext_iff] using h
lemma cycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma cycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) (h : f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles) :
f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [cycles_ext_iff] using h
lemma isIso_iCycles (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.iCycles :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_i _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.X₂` induced by `S.iCycles`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoX₂ (hg : S.g = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_iCycles hg
exact asIso S.iCycles
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.iCycles ≫ (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv ≫ S.iCycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_leftHomologyπ (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.leftHomologyπ :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_π _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology` induced
by `S.leftHomologyπ`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoLeftHomology (hf : S.f = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology := by
have := S.isIso_leftHomologyπ hf
exact asIso S.leftHomologyπ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ (S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv ≫ S.leftHomologyπ = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) left homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with left homology data. -/
def leftHomologyMapData : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced left homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def leftHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on cycles. -/
def cyclesMap' : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φK
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap'_i : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commi _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f'_cyclesMap' : h₁.f' ≫ cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, φ.comm₁₂, cyclesMap'_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality' :
h₁.π ≫ leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.π :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commπ _
end
section
variable [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (left) homology map `S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyMap : S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology :=
leftHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles := cyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.iCycles = S₁.iCycles ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_naturality : S₁.toCycles ≫ cyclesMap φ = φ.τ₁ ≫ S₂.toCycles :=
f'_cyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality :
S₁.leftHomologyπ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ = cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.leftHomologyπ :=
leftHomologyπ_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma leftHomologyMap'_eq : leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma cyclesMap'_eq : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φK :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φK (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end LeftHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
leftHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
leftHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
cyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
cyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
leftHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
leftHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
cyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
cyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = leftHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
leftHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.leftHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = cyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ cyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.cyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.cyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).cyclesMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φK]
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
leftHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = leftHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
cyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = cyclesMap φ₁ ≫ cyclesMap φ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] leftHomologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def leftHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := leftHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := leftHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `K` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def cyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.K ≅ h₂.K where
hom := cyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := cyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology where
hom := leftHomologyMap e.hom
inv := leftHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles where
hom := cyclesMap e.hom
inv := cyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : IsIso (cyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.leftHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyIso : S.leftHomology ≅ h.H :=
leftHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ h.K` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIso : S.cycles ≅ h.K :=
cyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIso_hom_comp_i : h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.i = S.iCycles := by
dsimp [iCycles, LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso]
simp only [cyclesMap'_i, id_τ₂, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIso_inv_comp_iCycles : h.cyclesIso.inv ≫ S.iCycles = h.i := by
simp only [← h.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_hom :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ h.leftHomologyIso.hom = h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.π := by
dsimp only [leftHomologyπ, leftHomologyIso, cyclesIso, leftHomologyMapIso',
cyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
rw [← leftHomologyπ_naturality']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_comp_leftHomologyIso_inv :
h.π ≫ h.leftHomologyIso.inv = h.cyclesIso.inv ≫ S.leftHomologyπ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.cyclesIso.hom, ← cancel_mono h.leftHomologyIso.hom, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyπ_comp_leftHomologyIso_hom]
end LeftHomologyData
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma leftHomologyMap_eq [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
leftHomologyMap φ = h₁.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.leftHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, leftHomologyMapIso']
rw [← γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, ← leftHomologyMap'_comp,
← leftHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma cyclesMap_eq [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
cyclesMap φ = h₁.cyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φK ≫ h₂.cyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp [LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso, cyclesMapIso']
rw [← γ.cyclesMap'_eq, ← cyclesMap'_comp, ← cyclesMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma leftHomologyMap_comm [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
leftHomologyMap φ ≫ h₂.leftHomologyIso.hom = h₁.leftHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.leftHomologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
lemma cyclesMap_comm [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
cyclesMap φ ≫ h₂.cyclesIso.hom = h₁.cyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φK := by
simp only [γ.cyclesMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end LeftHomologyMapData
section
variable (C)
variable [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C]
/-- The left homology functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`, where the left homology of a
short complex `S` is understood as a cokernel of the obvious map `S.toCycles : S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles`
where `S.cycles` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyFunctor : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.leftHomology
map := leftHomologyMap
/-- The cycles functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C` which sends a short complex `S` to `S.cycles`
which is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesFunctor : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.cycles
map := cyclesMap
/-- The natural transformation `S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyπNatTrans : cyclesFunctor C ⟶ leftHomologyFunctor C where
app S := leftHomologyπ S
naturality := fun _ _ φ => (leftHomologyπ_naturality φ).symm
/-- The natural transformation `S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def iCyclesNatTrans : cyclesFunctor C ⟶ ShortComplex.π₂ where
app S := S.iCycles
/-- The natural transformation `S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def toCyclesNatTrans :
π₁ ⟶ cyclesFunctor C where
app S := S.toCycles
naturality := fun _ _ φ => (toCycles_naturality φ).symm
end
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a left homology data for `S₁` induces a left homology data for `S₂` with
the same `K` and `H` fields. The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : LeftHomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : LeftHomologyData S₂ := by
let i : h.K ⟶ S₂.X₂ := h.i ≫ φ.τ₂
have wi : i ≫ S₂.g = 0 := by simp only [i, assoc, φ.comm₂₃, h.wi_assoc, zero_comp]
have hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi) := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun x hx => h.liftK (x ≫ inv φ.τ₂) (by rw [assoc, ← cancel_mono φ.τ₃, assoc,
assoc, ← φ.comm₂₃, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc, hx, zero_comp]))
(fun x hx => by simp [i]) (fun x hx b hb => by
dsimp
rw [← cancel_mono h.i, ← cancel_mono φ.τ₂, assoc, assoc, liftK_i_assoc,
assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, comp_id, hb])
let f' := hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι S₂.f S₂.zero)
have hf' : φ.τ₁ ≫ f' = h.f' := by
have eq := @Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ((KernelFork.ofι S₂.f S₂.zero)) hi
simp only [Fork.ι_ofι] at eq
rw [← cancel_mono h.i, ← cancel_mono φ.τ₂, assoc, assoc, eq, f'_i, φ.comm₁₂]
have wπ : f' ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi φ.τ₁, comp_zero, reassoc_of% hf', h.f'_π]
have hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ h.π wπ) := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun x hx => h.descH x (by rw [← hf', assoc, hx, comp_zero]))
(fun x hx => by simp) (fun x hx b hb => by rw [← cancel_epi h.π, π_descH, hb])
| exact ⟨h.K, h.H, i, h.π, wi, hi, wπ, hπ⟩
@[simp]
lemma τ₁_ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_f' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : LeftHomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : φ.τ₁ ≫ (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).f' = h.f' := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/LeftHomology.lean | 827 | 831 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MatrixPolynomialAlgebra
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
We define characteristic polynomials of matrices and
prove the Cayley–Hamilton theorem over arbitrary commutative rings.
See the file `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Coeff.lean` for corollaries of this theorem.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.charpoly` is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix.
## Implementation details
We follow a nice proof from http://drorbn.net/AcademicPensieve/2015-12/CayleyHamilton.pdf
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace Matrix
open Finset Matrix Polynomial
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable (M₁₁ : Matrix m m R) (M₁₂ : Matrix m n R) (M₂₁ : Matrix n m R) (M₂₂ M : Matrix n n R)
variable (i j : n)
/-- The "characteristic matrix" of `M : Matrix n n R` is the matrix of polynomials $t I - M$.
The determinant of this matrix is the characteristic polynomial.
-/
def charmatrix (M : Matrix n n R) : Matrix n n R[X] :=
Matrix.scalar n (X : R[X]) - (C : R →+* R[X]).mapMatrix M
theorem charmatrix_apply :
charmatrix M i j = (Matrix.diagonal fun _ : n => X) i j - C (M i j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem charmatrix_apply_eq : charmatrix M i i = (X : R[X]) - C (M i i) := by
simp only [charmatrix, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, sub_apply, scalar_apply, map_apply,
diagonal_apply_eq]
@[simp]
theorem charmatrix_apply_ne (h : i ≠ j) : charmatrix M i j = -C (M i j) := by
simp only [charmatrix, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, sub_apply, scalar_apply, diagonal_apply_ne _ h,
map_apply, sub_eq_neg_self]
theorem matPolyEquiv_charmatrix : matPolyEquiv (charmatrix M) = X - C M := by
ext k i j
simp only [matPolyEquiv_coeff_apply, coeff_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
rw [charmatrix_apply_eq, coeff_sub]
simp only [coeff_X, coeff_C]
split_ifs <;> simp
· rw [charmatrix_apply_ne _ _ _ h, coeff_X, coeff_neg, coeff_C, coeff_C]
split_ifs <;> simp [h]
theorem charmatrix_reindex (e : n ≃ m) :
charmatrix (reindex e e M) = reindex e e (charmatrix M) := by
ext i j x
by_cases h : i = j
all_goals simp [h]
lemma charmatrix_map (M : Matrix n n R) (f : R →+* S) :
charmatrix (M.map f) = (charmatrix M).map (Polynomial.map f) := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h, charmatrix, diagonal]
lemma charmatrix_fromBlocks :
charmatrix (fromBlocks M₁₁ M₁₂ M₂₁ M₂₂) =
fromBlocks (charmatrix M₁₁) (- M₁₂.map C) (- M₂₁.map C) (charmatrix M₂₂) := by
| simp only [charmatrix]
ext (i|i) (j|j) : 2 <;> simp [diagonal]
-- TODO: importing block triangular here is somewhat expensive, if more lemmas about it are added
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Basic.lean | 86 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Convergence of L-series
We define `LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv f` (as an `EReal`) to be the infimum
of all real numbers `x` such that the L-series of `f` converges for complex arguments with
real part `x` and provide some results about it.
## Tags
L-series, abscissa of convergence
-/
open Complex
/-- The abscissa `x : EReal` of absolute convergence of the L-series associated to `f`:
the series converges absolutely at `s` when `re s > x` and does not converge absolutely
when `re s < x`. -/
noncomputable def LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv (f : ℕ → ℂ) : EReal :=
sInf <| Real.toEReal '' {x : ℝ | LSeriesSummable f x}
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_congr {f g : ℕ → ℂ} (h : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → f n = g n) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f = abscissaOfAbsConv g :=
congr_arg sInf <| congr_arg _ <| Set.ext fun x ↦ LSeriesSummable_congr x h
open Filter in
/-- If `f` and `g` agree on large `n : ℕ`, then their `LSeries` have the same
abscissa of absolute convergence. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_congr' {f g : ℕ → ℂ} (h : f =ᶠ[atTop] g) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f = abscissaOfAbsConv g :=
congr_arg sInf <| congr_arg _ <| Set.ext fun x ↦ LSeriesSummable_congr' x h
open LSeries
lemma LSeriesSummable_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hs : abscissaOfAbsConv f < s.re) : LSeriesSummable f s := by
obtain ⟨y, hy, hys⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ, LSeriesSummable f a ∧ a < s.re := by
simpa [abscissaOfAbsConv, sInf_lt_iff] using hs
exact hy.of_re_le_re <| ofReal_re y ▸ hys.le
lemma LSeriesSummable_lt_re_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ}
(hs : abscissaOfAbsConv f < s.re) :
∃ x : ℝ, x < s.re ∧ LSeriesSummable f x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := EReal.exists_between_coe_real hs
exact ⟨x, by simpa using hx₂, LSeriesSummable_of_abscissaOfAbsConv_lt_re hx₁⟩
lemma LSeriesSummable.abscissaOfAbsConv_le {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (h : LSeriesSummable f s) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ s.re :=
sInf_le <| by simpa using h.of_re_le_re (by simp)
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : ℝ}
(h : ∀ y : ℝ, x < y → LSeriesSummable f y) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x := by
refine sInf_le_iff.mpr fun y hy ↦ le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a ↦ ?_
replace hy : ∀ (a : ℝ), LSeriesSummable f a → y ≤ a := by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hy
cases a with
| coe a₀ => exact_mod_cast fun ha ↦ hy a₀ (h a₀ ha)
| bot => simp
| top => simp
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable' {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : EReal}
(h : ∀ y : ℝ, x < y → LSeriesSummable f y) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x := by
cases x with
| coe => exact abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_forall_lt_LSeriesSummable <| mod_cast h
| top => exact le_top
| bot =>
refine le_of_eq <| sInf_eq_bot.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
cases y with
| bot => simp at hy
| coe y => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, h _ <| EReal.bot_lt_coe _, rfl⟩, mod_cast sub_one_lt y⟩
| top => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, h _ <| EReal.bot_lt_coe 0, rfl⟩, EReal.zero_lt_top⟩
/-- If `‖f n‖` is bounded by a constant times `n^x`, then the abscissa of absolute convergence
of `f` is bounded by `x + 1`. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_le_const_mul_rpow {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : ℝ}
(h : ∃ C, ∀ n ≠ 0, ‖f n‖ ≤ C * n ^ x) : abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x + 1 := by
rw [show x = x + 1 - 1 by ring] at h
by_contra! H
obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := EReal.exists_between_coe_real H
exact (LSeriesSummable_of_le_const_mul_rpow (s := y) (EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff.mp hy₁) h
|>.abscissaOfAbsConv_le.trans_lt hy₂).false
open Filter in
/-- If `‖f n‖` is `O(n^x)`, then the abscissa of absolute convergence
of `f` is bounded by `x + 1`. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_isBigO_rpow {f : ℕ → ℂ} {x : ℝ}
(h : f =O[atTop] fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ x) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ x + 1 := by
rw [show x = x + 1 - 1 by ring] at h
by_contra! H
obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ := EReal.exists_between_coe_real H
exact (LSeriesSummable_of_isBigO_rpow (s := y) (EReal.coe_lt_coe_iff.mp hy₁) h
|>.abscissaOfAbsConv_le.trans_lt hy₂).false
/-- If `f` is bounded, then the abscissa of absolute convergence of `f` is bounded above by `1`. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_le_const {f : ℕ → ℂ} (h : ∃ C, ∀ n ≠ 0, ‖f n‖ ≤ C) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ 1 := by
simpa using abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_le_const_mul_rpow (x := 0) (by simpa using h)
| open Filter in
/-- If `f` is `O(1)`, then the abscissa of absolute convergence of `f` is bounded above by `1`. -/
lemma LSeries.abscissaOfAbsConv_le_one_of_isBigO_one {f : ℕ → ℂ} (h : f =O[atTop] fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ)) :
abscissaOfAbsConv f ≤ 1 := by
simpa using abscissaOfAbsConv_le_of_isBigO_rpow (x := 0) (by simpa using h)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Convergence.lean | 108 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 530 | 540 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Mantas Bakšys, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mantas Bakšys, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monovary
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Rearrangement
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Chebyshev's sum inequality
This file proves the Chebyshev sum inequality.
Chebyshev's inequality states `(∑ i ∈ s, f i) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ #s * ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i`
when `f g : ι → α` monovary, and the reverse inequality when `f` and `g` antivary.
## Main declarations
* `MonovaryOn.sum_mul_sum_le_card_mul_sum`: Chebyshev's inequality.
* `AntivaryOn.card_mul_sum_le_sum_mul_sum`: Chebyshev's inequality, dual version.
* `sq_sum_le_card_mul_sum_sq`: Special case of Chebyshev's inequality when `f = g`.
## Implementation notes
In fact, we don't need much compatibility between the addition and multiplication of `α`, so we can
actually decouple them by replacing multiplication with scalar multiplication and making `f` and `g`
land in different types.
As a bonus, this makes the dual statement trivial. The multiplication versions are provided for
convenience.
The case for `Monotone`/`Antitone` pairs of functions over a `LinearOrder` is not deduced in this
file because it is easily deducible from the `Monovary` API.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Scalar multiplication versions -/
section SMul
variable [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [ExistsAddOfLE α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
[Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β] {s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` monovary together (eg they are both
monotone/antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) • ∑ i ∈ s, g i ≤ #s • ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
obtain ⟨σ, hσ, hs⟩ := s.countable_toSet.exists_cycleOn
rw [← card_range #s, sum_smul_sum_eq_sum_perm hσ]
exact sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ fun n _ ↦
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul fun x hx ↦ hs fun h ↦ hx <| IsFixedPt.perm_pow h _
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` antivary together (eg one is monotone, the
other is antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem AntivaryOn.card_smul_sum_le_sum_smul_sum (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
#s • ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i) • ∑ i ∈ s, g i :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` monovary together (eg they are both
monotone/antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem Monovary.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum (hfg : Monovary f g) :
(∑ i, f i) • ∑ i, g i ≤ Fintype.card ι • ∑ i, f i • g i :=
(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` antivary together (eg one is monotone, the
other is antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem Antivary.card_smul_sum_le_sum_smul_sum (hfg : Antivary f g) :
Fintype.card ι • ∑ i, f i • g i ≤ (∑ i, f i) • ∑ i, g i :=
(hfg.dual_right.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum
end SMul
/-!
### Multiplication versions
Special cases of the above when scalar multiplication is actually multiplication.
-/
section Mul
variable [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [ExistsAddOfLE α]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f g : ι → α}
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` monovary together (eg they are both
monotone/antitone), the product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their scalar
product. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_mul_sum_le_card_mul_sum (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) * ∑ i ∈ s, g i ≤ #s * ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i := by
rw [← nsmul_eq_mul]
exact hfg.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` antivary together (eg one is monotone, the
other is antitone), the product of their sum is greater than the size of the set times their scalar
product. -/
theorem AntivaryOn.card_mul_sum_le_sum_mul_sum (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
(#s : α) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i) * ∑ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← nsmul_eq_mul]
exact hfg.card_smul_sum_le_sum_smul_sum
/-- Special case of **Jensen's inequality** for sums of powers. -/
lemma pow_sum_le_card_mul_sum_pow (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
∀ n, (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ (n + 1) ≤ (#s : α) ^ n * ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ (n + 1)
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
_ = (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ (n + 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by rw [pow_succ]
_ ≤ (#s ^ n * ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ (n + 1)) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
gcongr
exacts [sum_nonneg hf, pow_sum_le_card_mul_sum_pow hf _]
_ = #s ^ n * ((∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ (n + 1)) * ∑ i ∈ s, f i) := by rw [mul_assoc]
| _ ≤ #s ^ n * (#s * ∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ (n + 1) * f i) := by
gcongr _ * ?_
exact ((monovaryOn_self ..).pow_left₀ hf _).sum_mul_sum_le_card_mul_sum
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Chebyshev.lean | 126 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Main definitions
- `MvPowerSeries.C`: constant power series
- `MvPowerSeries.X`: the indeterminates
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff`, `MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff`:
the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries`, its constant coefficient
- `MvPowerSeries.monomial`: the monomials
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul`: computes the coefficients of the product of two `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod` : computes the coefficients of products of `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_pow` : computes the coefficients of powers of a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent`: if the constant coefficient
of a `MvPowerSeries` is nilpotent, then some coefficients of its powers are automatically zero
- `MvPowerSeries.map`: apply a `RingHom` to the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries` (as a `RingHom)
- `MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff`, `MvPowerSeries.X_dvd_iff`: equivalent
conditions for (a power of) an indeterminate to divide a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPolynomial.toMvPowerSeries`: the canonical coercion from `MvPolynomial` to `MvPowerSeries`
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
theorem coeff_apply (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R d f = f d :=
rfl
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
dsimp only [coeff, MvPowerSeries]
rw [monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m), LinearMap.single_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_same _ _
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_coeff_zero {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
f = 0 ↔ (∀ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f = 0) :=
MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff_exists_coeff_ne_zero (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
f ≠ 0 ↔ (∃ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f ≠ 0) := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, ne_eq, coeff_zero, not_forall]
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem commute_monomial {a : R} {n} :
Commute φ (monomial R n a) ↔ ∀ m, Commute (coeff R m φ) a := by
rw [commute_iff_eq, MvPowerSeries.ext_iff]
refine ⟨fun h m => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· have := h (m + n)
rwa [coeff_add_mul_monomial, add_comm, coeff_add_monomial_mul] at this
· rw [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial_mul]
split_ifs <;> [apply h; rfl]
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = φ :=
| ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ 1
protected theorem mul_one : φ * 1 = φ :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 272 | 274 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
(l.zipWith ((fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) (List.range l.length)).sum =
b * (l.zipWith (fun a i => a * b ^ i) (List.range l.length)).sum := by
suffices
l.zipWith (fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) (List.range l.length) =
l.zipWith (fun a i=> b * (a * b ^ i)) (List.range l.length)
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, List.zipIdx_eq_zip_range', List.map_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr, ← List.range_eq_range']
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_right, ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux] using
Or.inl hl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d List.mem_cons_self
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
rcases b with - | b
· rcases n with - | n
· rfl
· simp
· rcases b with - | b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n h => ?_
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· simp [IH, h]
aesop
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
lemma ofDigits_inj_of_len_eq {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {L1 L2 : List ℕ}
(len : L1.length = L2.length) (w1 : ∀ l ∈ L1, l < b) (w2 : ∀ l ∈ L2, l < b)
(h : ofDigits b L1 = ofDigits b L2) : L1 = L2 := by
induction' L1 with D L ih generalizing L2
· simp only [List.length_nil] at len
exact (List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp len.symm).symm
obtain ⟨d, l, rfl⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_length_eq_add_one len.symm
simp only [List.length_cons, add_left_inj] at len
simp only [ofDigits_cons] at h
have eqd : D = d := by
have H : (D + b * ofDigits b L) % b = (d + b * ofDigits b l) % b := by rw [h]
simpa [mod_eq_of_lt (w2 d List.mem_cons_self),
mod_eq_of_lt (w1 D List.mem_cons_self)] using H
simp only [eqd, add_right_inj, mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (zero_lt_of_lt hb)] at h
have := ih len (fun a ha ↦ w1 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem D ha)
(fun a ha ↦ w2 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem d ha) h
rw [eqd, this]
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them -/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero_iff, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
| intro d hd
rcases n with - | n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 379 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases x with
| top => exact (h'x rfl).elim
| coe x =>
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
induction x using recTopCoe
· rcases hy.eq_or_lt with rfl|hy
· rw [rpow_zero, one_mul, zero_add]
rcases hz.eq_or_lt with rfl|hz
· rw [rpow_zero, mul_one, add_zero]
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, hy, hz, add_pos hy hz]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hy, hz, add_nonneg hy hz, NNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg _ hy hz]
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· have : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, h, this, NNReal.rpow_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases x
· cases n <;> simp [top_rpow_of_pos (Nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (Nat.cast_nonneg n)]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
| cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 633 | 634 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
/-!
# The *-ring structure on suitable quotients of a *-ring.
-/
namespace RingQuot
universe u
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] (r : R → R → Prop)
section StarRing
variable [StarRing R]
| theorem Rel.star (hr : ∀ a b, r a b → r (star a) (star b))
⦃a b : R⦄ (h : Rel r a b) : Rel r (star a) (star b) := by
induction h with
| of h => exact Rel.of (hr _ _ h)
| add_left _ h => rw [star_add, star_add]
exact Rel.add_left h
| mul_left _ h => rw [star_mul, star_mul]
exact Rel.mul_right h
| mul_right _ h => rw [star_mul, star_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/RingQuot.lean | 23 | 31 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Topological study of spaces `Π (n : ℕ), E n`
When `E n` are topological spaces, the space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` is naturally a topological space
(with the product topology). When `E n` are uniform spaces, it also inherits a uniform structure.
However, it does not inherit a canonical metric space structure of the `E n`. Nevertheless, one
can put a noncanonical metric space structure (or rather, several of them). This is done in this
file.
## Main definitions and results
One can define a combinatorial distance on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, as follows:
* `PiNat.cylinder x n` is the set of points `y` with `x i = y i` for `i < n`.
* `PiNat.firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x i ≠ y i`.
* `PiNat.dist x y` is equal to `(1/2) ^ (firstDiff x y)`. It defines a distance
on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, compatible with the topology when the `E n` have the discrete topology.
* `PiNat.metricSpace`: the metric space structure, given by this distance. Not registered as an
instance. This space is a complete metric space.
* `PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity`: the same metric space structure, but adjusting the
uniformity defeqness when the `E n` already have the discrete uniformity. Not registered as an
instance
* `PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat`: the particular case of `ℕ → ℕ`, not registered as an instance.
These results are used to construct continuous functions on `Π n, E n`:
* `PiNat.exists_retraction_of_isClosed`: given a nonempty closed subset `s` of `Π (n : ℕ), E n`,
there exists a retraction onto `s`, i.e., a continuous map from the whole space to `s`
restricting to the identity on `s`.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace`: given any nonempty complete metric
space with second-countable topology, there exists a continuous surjection from `ℕ → ℕ` onto
this space.
One can also put distances on `Π (i : ι), E i` when the spaces `E i` are metric spaces (not discrete
in general), and `ι` is countable.
* `PiCountable.dist` is the distance on `Π i, E i` given by
`dist x y = ∑' i, min (1/2)^(encode i) (dist (x i) (y i))`.
* `PiCountable.metricSpace` is the corresponding metric space structure, adjusted so that
the uniformity is definitionally the product uniformity. Not registered as an instance.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ one_lt_two inv_le_inv₀ zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
/-! ### The firstDiff function -/
open Classical in
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, then `firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x` and `y`
differ. If `x = y`, then by convention we set `firstDiff x x = 0`. -/
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
classical
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
classical
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
/-! ### Cylinders -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, the cylinder set of length `n` around `x`, denoted
`cylinder x n`, is the set of sequences `y` that coincide with `x` on the first `n` symbols, i.e.,
such that `y i = x i` for all `i < n`.
-/
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
section Res
variable {α : Type*}
open List
/-- In the case where `E` has constant value `α`,
the cylinder `cylinder x n` can be identified with the element of `List α`
consisting of the first `n` entries of `x`. See `cylinder_eq_res`.
We call this list `res x n`, the restriction of `x` to `n`. -/
def res (x : ℕ → α) : ℕ → List α
| 0 => nil
| Nat.succ n => x n :: res x n
@[simp]
theorem res_zero (x : ℕ → α) : res x 0 = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_succ (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : res x n.succ = x n :: res x n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_length (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : (res x n).length = n := by induction n <;> simp [*]
/-- The restrictions of `x` and `y` to `n` are equal if and only if `x m = y m` for all `m < n`. -/
theorem res_eq_res {x y : ℕ → α} {n : ℕ} :
res x n = res y n ↔ ∀ ⦃m⦄, m < n → x m = y m := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
intro m hm
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq] at h
rcases hm with hm | hm
· exact ih h.2 hm
rw [hm]
exact h.1
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨h (Nat.lt_succ_self _), ih fun m hm => ?_⟩
exact h (hm.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
theorem res_injective : Injective (@res α) := by
intro x y h
ext n
apply res_eq_res.mp _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
rw [h]
/-- `cylinder x n` is equal to the set of sequences `y` with the same restriction to `n` as `x`. -/
theorem cylinder_eq_res (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = { y | res y n = res x n } := by
ext y
dsimp [cylinder]
rw [res_eq_res]
end Res
/-!
### A distance function on `Π n, E n`
We define a distance function on `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is the first
index at which `x` and `y` differ. When each `E n` has the discrete topology, this distance will
define the right topology on the product space. We do not record a global `Dist` instance nor
a `MetricSpace` instance, as other distances may be used on these spaces, but we register them as
local instances in this section.
-/
open Classical in
/-- The distance function on a product space `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is
the first index at which `x` and `y` differ. -/
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
classical
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv₀, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right₀, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
suffices (∀ i : ℕ, i < n → y i = x i) ↔ n ≤ firstDiff y x by simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
constructor
· intro hy
by_contra! H
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (hy _ H)
· intro h i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le h)
theorem apply_eq_of_dist_lt {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (h : dist x y < (1 / 2) ^ n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ≤ n) : x i = y i := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· rfl
have : n < firstDiff x y := by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne, inv_lt_inv₀, pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀, one_lt_two] using h
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_lt this)
/-- A function to a pseudo-metric-space is `1`-Lipschitz if and only if points in the same cylinder
of length `n` are sent to points within distance `(1/2)^n`.
Not expressed using `LipschitzWith` as we don't have a metric space structure -/
theorem lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder {α : Type*}
[PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : (∀ n, E n) → α} :
(∀ x y : ∀ n, E n, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) ↔
∀ x y n, y ∈ cylinder x n → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro H x y n hxy
apply (H x y).trans
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hxy
· intro H x y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rw [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
apply H x y (firstDiff x y)
rw [firstDiff_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_firstDiff _ _
variable (E)
variable [∀ n, TopologicalSpace (E n)] [∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n)]
theorem isOpen_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : IsOpen (cylinder x n) := by
rw [PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi]
exact isOpen_set_pi (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun a _ => isOpen_discrete _
theorem isTopologicalBasis_cylinders :
IsTopologicalBasis { s : Set (∀ n, E n) | ∃ (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n } := by
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u ⟨x, n, rfl⟩
apply isOpen_cylinder
· intro x u hx u_open
obtain ⟨v, ⟨U, F, -, rfl⟩, xU, Uu⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { S : Set (∀ i : ℕ, E i) | ∃ (U : ∀ i : ℕ, Set (E i)) (F : Finset ℕ),
(∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → U i ∈ { s : Set (E i) | IsOpen s }) ∧ S = (F : Set ℕ).pi U },
x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
(isTopologicalBasis_pi fun n : ℕ => isTopologicalBasis_opens).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx
u_open
rcases Finset.bddAbove F with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨cylinder x (n + 1), ⟨x, n + 1, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder _ _, Subset.trans ?_ Uu⟩
intro y hy
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → y i ∈ U i by simpa
intro i hi
have : y i = x i := mem_cylinder_iff.1 hy i ((hn hi).trans_lt (lt_add_one n))
rw [this]
simp only [Set.mem_pi, Finset.mem_coe] at xU
exact xU i hi
variable {E}
theorem isOpen_iff_dist (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs x hx
obtain ⟨v, ⟨y, n, rfl⟩, h'x, h's⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { s | ∃ (x : ∀ n : ℕ, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n }, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ s :=
(isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx hs
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq.1 h'x] at h's
exact
⟨(1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n, by simp, fun y hy => h's fun i hi => (apply_eq_of_dist_lt hy hi.le).symm⟩
· intro h
refine (isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).isOpen_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
rcases h x hx with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨cylinder x n, ⟨x, n, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder x n, fun y hy => hε y ?_⟩
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact (mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy).trans_lt hn
/-- Metric space structure on `Π (n : ℕ), E n` when the spaces `E n` have the discrete topology,
where the distance is given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n`, where `n` is the smallest index where `x` and
`y` differ. Not registered as a global instance by default.
Warning: this definition makes sure that the topology is defeq to the original product topology,
but it does not take care of a possible uniformity. If the `E n` have a uniform structure, then
there will be two non-defeq uniform structures on `Π n, E n`, the product one and the one coming
from the metric structure. In this case, use `metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity` instead. -/
protected def metricSpace : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
MetricSpace.ofDistTopology dist PiNat.dist_self PiNat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_triangle
isOpen_iff_dist PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
/-- Metric space structure on `Π (n : ℕ), E n` when the spaces `E n` have the discrete uniformity,
where the distance is given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n`, where `n` is the smallest index where `x` and
`y` differ. Not registered as a global instance by default. -/
protected def metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity {E : ℕ → Type*} [∀ n, UniformSpace (E n)]
(h : ∀ n, uniformity (E n) = 𝓟 idRel) : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
haveI : ∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n) := fun n => discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity (h n)
{ dist_triangle := PiNat.dist_triangle
dist_comm := PiNat.dist_comm
dist_self := PiNat.dist_self
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero _ _
toUniformSpace := Pi.uniformSpace _
uniformity_dist := by
simp only [Pi.uniformity, h, idRel, comap_principal, preimage_setOf_eq]
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos (by norm_num)
apply
@mem_iInf_of_iInter _ _ _ _ _ (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun i =>
{ p : (∀ n : ℕ, E n) × ∀ n : ℕ, E n | p.fst i = p.snd i }
· simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, imp_self, imp_true_iff]
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_range, iInter_coe_set, mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq]
at hxy
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le, mem_cylinder_iff]
exact hxy
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro n
refine mem_iInf_of_mem ((1 / 2) ^ n : ℝ) ?_
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (by positivity) ?_
simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, Prod.forall]
intro x y hxy
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt hxy le_rfl }
/-- Metric space structure on `ℕ → ℕ` where the distance is given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n`,
where `n` is the smallest index where `x` and `y` differ.
Not registered as a global instance by default. -/
def metricSpaceNatNat : MetricSpace (ℕ → ℕ) :=
PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity fun _ => rfl
attribute [local instance] PiNat.metricSpace
protected theorem completeSpace : CompleteSpace (∀ n, E n) := by
refine Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (fun n => (1 / 2) ^ n) (by simp) ?_
intro u hu
refine ⟨fun n => u n n, tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => ?_⟩
refine tendsto_const_nhds.congr' ?_
filter_upwards [Filter.Ici_mem_atTop i] with n hn
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt (hu i i n le_rfl hn) le_rfl
/-!
### Retractions inside product spaces
We show that, in a space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` where each `E n` is discrete, there is a retraction on
any closed nonempty subset `s`, i.e., a continuous map `f` from the whole space to `s` restricting
to the identity on `s`. The map `f` is defined as follows. For `x ∈ s`, let `f x = x`. Otherwise,
consider the longest prefix `w` that `x` shares with an element of `s`, and let `f x = z_w`
where `z_w` is an element of `s` starting with `w`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_cylinder {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
have A : 0 < infDist x s := (hs.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hne).1 hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < infDist x s := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one A one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨n, disjoint_left.2 fun y ys hy => ?_⟩
apply lt_irrefl (infDist x s)
calc
infDist x s ≤ dist x y := infDist_le_dist_of_mem ys
_ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rw [mem_cylinder_comm] at hy
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy
_ < infDist x s := hn
open Classical in
/-- Given a point `x` in a product space `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, and `s` a subset of this space, then
`shortestPrefixDiff x s` if the smallest `n` for which there is no element of `s` having the same
prefix of length `n` as `x`. If there is no such `n`, then use `0` by convention. -/
def shortestPrefixDiff {E : ℕ → Type*} (x : ∀ n, E n) (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) : ℕ :=
if h : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) then Nat.find h else 0
theorem firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x y : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : firstDiff x y < shortestPrefixDiff x s := by
have A := exists_disjoint_cylinder hs hx
rw [shortestPrefixDiff, dif_pos A]
classical
have B := Nat.find_spec A
contrapose! B
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [mem_cylinder_comm]
exact cylinder_anti y B (mem_cylinder_firstDiff x y)
theorem shortestPrefixDiff_pos {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
{x : ∀ n, E n} (hx : x ∉ s) : 0 < shortestPrefixDiff x s := by
rcases hne with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact (zero_le _).trans_lt (firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff hs hx hy)
/-- Given a point `x` in a product space `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, and `s` a subset of this space, then
`longestPrefix x s` if the largest `n` for which there is an element of `s` having the same
| prefix of length `n` as `x`. If there is no such `n`, use `0` by convention. -/
def longestPrefix {E : ℕ → Type*} (x : ∀ n, E n) (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) : ℕ :=
shortestPrefixDiff x s - 1
theorem firstDiff_le_longestPrefix {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x y : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : firstDiff x y ≤ longestPrefix x s := by
rw [longestPrefix, le_tsub_iff_right]
· exact firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff hs hx hy
· exact shortestPrefixDiff_pos hs ⟨y, hy⟩ hx
theorem inter_cylinder_longestPrefix_nonempty {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (x : ∀ n, E n) : (s ∩ cylinder x (longestPrefix x s)).Nonempty := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· exact ⟨x, hx, self_mem_cylinder _ _⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 487 | 500 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder
/-!
# Extra lemmas about intervals
This file contains lemmas about intervals that cannot be included into `Order.Interval.Set.Basic`
because this would create an `import` cycle. Namely, lemmas in this file can use definitions
from `Data.Set.Lattice`, including `Disjoint`.
We consider various intersections and unions of half infinite intervals.
-/
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort u} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
open Set
open OrderDual (toDual)
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioi b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt hb).not_le ha
@[simp]
theorem Iio_disjoint_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iio a) (Ici b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt' ha).not_le hb
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioi h).mono le_rfl Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioc h).mono Ioc_subset_Iic_self le_rfl
@[deprecated Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le (since := "2025-03-04")]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioc le_rfl).mono Ioc_subset_Iic_self le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_same : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hab hbc => hab.2.not_le hbc.1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_disjoint_Iic : Disjoint (Ici a) (Iic b) ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ici_inter_Iic, Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ici : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ici b) ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
disjoint_comm.trans Ici_disjoint_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr (fun _ hx hy ↦ (hx.2.trans h).not_lt hy)
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi b) :=
Ioc_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iic : ⋃ a : α, Iic a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ici : ⋃ a : α, Ici a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Icc a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioc a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Icc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ico a b = Iio b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Iio a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_gt
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Ioi a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_lt
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ico a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioo a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioo a b = Iio b := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
@[simp]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico : Disjoint (Ico a₁ a₂) (Ico b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ico_inter_Ico, Ico_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc : Disjoint (Ioc a₁ a₂) (Ioc b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
have h : _ ↔ min (toDual a₁) (toDual b₁) ≤ max (toDual a₂) (toDual b₂) := Ico_disjoint_Ico
simpa only [Ico_toDual] using h
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_disjoint_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] :
Disjoint (Set.Ioo a₁ a₂) (Set.Ioo b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ioo_inter_Ioo, Ioo_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
/-- If two half-open intervals are disjoint and the endpoint of one lies in the other,
then it must be equal to the endpoint of the other. -/
theorem eq_of_Ico_disjoint {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : α} (h : Disjoint (Ico x₁ x₂) (Ico y₁ y₂)) (hx : x₁ < x₂)
(h2 : x₂ ∈ Ico y₁ y₂) : y₁ = x₂ := by
rw [Ico_disjoint_Ico, min_eq_left (le_of_lt h2.2), le_max_iff] at h
apply le_antisymm h2.1
exact h.elim (fun h => absurd hx (not_lt_of_le h)) id
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_eq_Iio_self_iff {f : ι → α} {a : α} :
⋃ i, Ico (f i) a = Iio a ↔ ∀ x < a, ∃ i, f i ≤ x := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, subset_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_eq_Ioi_self_iff {f : ι → α} {a : α} :
⋃ i, Ioc a (f i) = Ioi a ↔ ∀ x, a < x → ∃ i, x ≤ f i := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, subset_def]
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_Ico_eq_Iio_self_iff {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} :
⋃ (i) (hi : p i), Ico (f i hi) a = Iio a ↔ ∀ x < a, ∃ i hi, f i hi ≤ x := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, subset_def]
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_Ioc_eq_Ioi_self_iff {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α} {a : α} :
⋃ (i) (hi : p i), Ioc a (f i hi) = Ioi a ↔ ∀ x, a < x → ∃ i hi, x ≤ f i hi := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, subset_def]
end LinearOrder
end Set
section UnionIxx
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a : α} {f : ι → α}
|
theorem IsGLB.biUnion_Ioi_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : ⋃ x ∈ s, Ioi x = Ioi a := by
refine (iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => ?_).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Disjoint.lean | 176 | 178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiset coercion to type
This module defines a `CoeSort` instance for multisets and gives it a `Fintype` instance.
It also defines `Multiset.toEnumFinset`, which is another way to enumerate the elements of
a multiset. These coercions and definitions make it easier to sum over multisets using existing
`Finset` theory.
## Main definitions
* A coercion from `m : Multiset α` to a `Type*`. Each `x : m` has two components.
The first, `x.1`, can be obtained via the coercion `↑x : α`,
and it yields the underlying element of the multiset.
The second, `x.2`, is a term of `Fin (m.count x)`,
and its function is to ensure each term appears with the correct multiplicity.
Note that this coercion requires `DecidableEq α` due to the definition using `Multiset.count`.
* `Multiset.toEnumFinset` is a `Finset` version of this.
* `Multiset.coeEmbedding` is the embedding `m ↪ α × ℕ`, whose first component is the coercion
and whose second component enumerates elements with multiplicity.
* `Multiset.coeEquiv` is the equivalence `m ≃ m.toEnumFinset`.
## Tags
multiset enumeration
-/
variable {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {m : Multiset α}
namespace Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `CoeSort` instance. This prevents the `CoeOut m α`
instance from inadvertently applying to other sigma types. -/
def ToType (m : Multiset α) : Type _ := (x : α) × Fin (m.count x)
/-- Create a type that has the same number of elements as the multiset.
Terms of this type are triples `⟨x, ⟨i, h⟩⟩` where `x : α`, `i : ℕ`, and `h : i < m.count x`.
This way repeated elements of a multiset appear multiple times from different values of `i`. -/
instance : CoeSort (Multiset α) (Type _) := ⟨Multiset.ToType⟩
example : DecidableEq m := inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq ((x : α) × Fin (m.count x))
/-- Constructor for terms of the coercion of `m` to a type.
This helps Lean pick up the correct instances. -/
@[reducible, match_pattern]
def mkToType (m : Multiset α) (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)) : m :=
⟨x, i⟩
/-- As a convenience, there is a coercion from `m : Type*` to `α` by projecting onto the first
component. -/
instance instCoeSortMultisetType.instCoeOutToType : CoeOut m α :=
⟨fun x ↦ x.1⟩
theorem coe_mk {x : α} {i : Fin (m.count x)} : ↑(m.mkToType x i) = x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mem {x : m} : ↑x ∈ m := Multiset.count_pos.mp (by have := x.2.2; omega)
@[simp]
protected theorem forall_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∀ x : m, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ :=
Sigma.forall
@[simp]
protected theorem exists_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∃ x : m, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ :=
Sigma.exists
instance : Fintype { p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1 } :=
Fintype.ofFinset
(m.toFinset.biUnion fun x ↦ (Finset.range (m.count x)).map ⟨_, Prod.mk_right_injective x⟩)
(by
rintro ⟨x, i⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_range,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Prod.mk_inj, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp only [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun h ↦ Multiset.count_pos.mp (by omega))
/-- Construct a finset whose elements enumerate the elements of the multiset `m`.
The `ℕ` component is used to differentiate between equal elements: if `x` appears `n` times
then `(x, 0)`, ..., and `(x, n-1)` appear in the `Finset`. -/
def toEnumFinset (m : Multiset α) : Finset (α × ℕ) :=
{ p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1 }.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem mem_toEnumFinset (m : Multiset α) (p : α × ℕ) :
p ∈ m.toEnumFinset ↔ p.2 < m.count p.1 :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem mem_of_mem_toEnumFinset {p : α × ℕ} (h : p ∈ m.toEnumFinset) : p.1 ∈ m :=
have := (m.mem_toEnumFinset p).mp h; Multiset.count_pos.mp (by omega)
@[simp] lemma toEnumFinset_filter_eq (m : Multiset α) (a : α) :
{x ∈ m.toEnumFinset | x.1 = a} = {a} ×ˢ Finset.range (m.count a) := by aesop
@[simp] lemma map_toEnumFinset_fst (m : Multiset α) : m.toEnumFinset.val.map Prod.fst = m := by
ext a; simp [count_map, ← Finset.filter_val, eq_comm (a := a)]
@[simp] lemma image_toEnumFinset_fst (m : Multiset α) :
m.toEnumFinset.image Prod.fst = m.toFinset := by
rw [Finset.image, Multiset.map_toEnumFinset_fst]
@[simp] lemma map_fst_le_of_subset_toEnumFinset {s : Finset (α × ℕ)} (hsm : s ⊆ m.toEnumFinset) :
s.1.map Prod.fst ≤ m := by
simp_rw [le_iff_count, count_map]
rintro a
obtain ha | ha := (s.1.filter fun x ↦ a = x.1).card.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
obtain ⟨n, han, hn⟩ : ∃ n ≥ card (s.1.filter fun x ↦ a = x.1) - 1, (a, n) ∈ s := by
by_contra! h
replace h : {x ∈ s | x.1 = a} ⊆ {a} ×ˢ .range (card (s.1.filter fun x ↦ a = x.1) - 1) := by
simpa +contextual [forall_swap (β := _ = a), Finset.subset_iff,
imp_not_comm, not_le, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] using h
have : card (s.1.filter fun x ↦ a = x.1) ≤ card (s.1.filter fun x ↦ a = x.1) - 1 := by
simpa [Finset.card, eq_comm] using Finset.card_mono h
omega
exact Nat.le_of_pred_lt (han.trans_lt <| by simpa using hsm hn)
@[mono]
theorem toEnumFinset_mono {m₁ m₂ : Multiset α} (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) :
m₁.toEnumFinset ⊆ m₂.toEnumFinset := by
intro p
simp only [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact gt_of_ge_of_gt (Multiset.le_iff_count.mp h p.1)
@[simp]
theorem toEnumFinset_subset_iff {m₁ m₂ : Multiset α} :
m₁.toEnumFinset ⊆ m₂.toEnumFinset ↔ m₁ ≤ m₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using map_fst_le_of_subset_toEnumFinset h, Multiset.toEnumFinset_mono⟩
/-- The embedding from a multiset into `α × ℕ` where the second coordinate enumerates repeats.
If you are looking for the function `m → α`, that would be plain `(↑)`. -/
@[simps]
def coeEmbedding (m : Multiset α) : m ↪ α × ℕ where
toFun x := (x, x.2)
inj' := by
intro ⟨x, i, hi⟩ ⟨y, j, hj⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
rfl
/-- Another way to coerce a `Multiset` to a type is to go through `m.toEnumFinset` and coerce
that `Finset` to a type. -/
@[simps]
def coeEquiv (m : Multiset α) : m ≃ m.toEnumFinset where
toFun x :=
⟨m.coeEmbedding x, by
rw [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact x.2.2⟩
invFun x :=
⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by
rw [← Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact x.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, i, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, i⟩, h⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toEmbedding_coeEquiv_trans (m : Multiset α) :
m.coeEquiv.toEmbedding.trans (Function.Embedding.subtype _) = m.coeEmbedding := by ext <;> rfl
@[irreducible]
instance fintypeCoe : Fintype m :=
Fintype.ofEquiv m.toEnumFinset m.coeEquiv.symm
theorem map_univ_coeEmbedding (m : Multiset α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset m).map m.coeEmbedding = m.toEnumFinset := by
ext ⟨x, i⟩
simp only [Fin.exists_iff, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_univ, Multiset.coeEmbedding_apply,
Prod.mk_inj, exists_true_left, Multiset.exists_coe, Multiset.coe_mk, Fin.val_mk,
exists_prop, exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right, Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset, true_and]
@[simp]
| theorem map_univ_coe (m : Multiset α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset m).val.map (fun x : m ↦ (x : α)) = m := by
have := m.map_toEnumFinset_fst
rw [← m.map_univ_coeEmbedding] at this
simpa only [Finset.map_val, Multiset.coeEmbedding_apply, Multiset.map_map,
Function.comp_apply] using this
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Fintype.lean | 185 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Monoid
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Ordinal
/-!
# Surreal numbers
The basic theory of surreal numbers, built on top of the theory of combinatorial (pre-)games.
A pregame is `Numeric` if all the Left options are strictly smaller than all the Right options, and
all those options are themselves numeric. In terms of combinatorial games, the numeric games have
"frozen"; you can only make your position worse by playing, and Left is some definite "number" of
moves ahead (or behind) Right.
A surreal number is an equivalence class of numeric pregames.
In fact, the surreals form a complete ordered field, containing a copy of the reals (and much else
besides!) but we do not yet have a complete development.
## Order properties
Surreal numbers inherit the relations `≤` and `<` from games (`Surreal.instLE` and
`Surreal.instLT`), and these relations satisfy the axioms of a partial order.
## Algebraic operations
In this file, we show that the surreals form a linear ordered commutative group.
In `Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Multiplication`, we define multiplication and show that the
surreals form a linear ordered commutative ring.
One can also map all the ordinals into the surreals!
## TODO
- Define the field structure on the surreals.
## References
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][Conway2001]
* [Schleicher, Stoll, *An introduction to Conway's games and numbers*][SchleicherStoll]
-/
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
/-- A pre-game is numeric if everything in the L set is less than everything in the R set,
and all the elements of L and R are also numeric. -/
def Numeric : PGame → Prop
| ⟨_, _, L, R⟩ => (∀ i j, L i < R j) ∧ (∀ i, Numeric (L i)) ∧ ∀ j, Numeric (R j)
theorem numeric_def {x : PGame} :
Numeric x ↔
(∀ i j, x.moveLeft i < x.moveRight j) ∧
(∀ i, Numeric (x.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, Numeric (x.moveRight j) := by
cases x; rfl
namespace Numeric
theorem mk {x : PGame} (h₁ : ∀ i j, x.moveLeft i < x.moveRight j) (h₂ : ∀ i, Numeric (x.moveLeft i))
(h₃ : ∀ j, Numeric (x.moveRight j)) : Numeric x :=
numeric_def.2 ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem left_lt_right {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (i : x.LeftMoves) (j : x.RightMoves) :
x.moveLeft i < x.moveRight j := by cases x; exact o.1 i j
theorem moveLeft {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (i : x.LeftMoves) : Numeric (x.moveLeft i) := by
cases x; exact o.2.1 i
theorem moveRight {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (j : x.RightMoves) : Numeric (x.moveRight j) := by
cases x; exact o.2.2 j
lemma isOption {x' x} (h : IsOption x' x) (hx : Numeric x) : Numeric x' := by
cases h
· apply hx.moveLeft
· apply hx.moveRight
end Numeric
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem numeric_rec {C : PGame → Prop}
(H : ∀ (l r) (L : l → PGame) (R : r → PGame), (∀ i j, L i < R j) →
(∀ i, Numeric (L i)) → (∀ i, Numeric (R i)) → (∀ i, C (L i)) → (∀ i, C (R i)) →
C ⟨l, r, L, R⟩) :
∀ x, Numeric x → C x
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨h, hl, hr⟩ =>
H _ _ _ _ h hl hr (fun i => numeric_rec H _ (hl i)) fun i => numeric_rec H _ (hr i)
theorem Relabelling.numeric_imp {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) (ox : Numeric x) : Numeric y := by
induction' x using PGame.moveRecOn with x IHl IHr generalizing y
apply Numeric.mk (fun i j => ?_) (fun i => ?_) fun j => ?_
· rw [← lt_congr (r.moveLeftSymm i).equiv (r.moveRightSymm j).equiv]
apply ox.left_lt_right
· exact IHl _ (r.moveLeftSymm i) (ox.moveLeft _)
· exact IHr _ (r.moveRightSymm j) (ox.moveRight _)
/-- Relabellings preserve being numeric. -/
theorem Relabelling.numeric_congr {x y : PGame} (r : x ≡r y) : Numeric x ↔ Numeric y :=
⟨r.numeric_imp, r.symm.numeric_imp⟩
theorem lf_asymm {x y : PGame} (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : x ⧏ y → ¬y ⧏ x := by
refine numeric_rec (C := fun x => ∀ z (_oz : Numeric z), x ⧏ z → ¬z ⧏ x)
(fun xl xr xL xR hx _oxl _oxr IHxl IHxr => ?_) x ox y oy
refine numeric_rec fun yl yr yL yR hy oyl oyr _IHyl _IHyr => ?_
rw [mk_lf_mk, mk_lf_mk]; rintro (⟨i, h₁⟩ | ⟨j, h₁⟩) (⟨i, h₂⟩ | ⟨j, h₂⟩)
· exact IHxl _ _ (oyl _) (h₁.moveLeft_lf _) (h₂.moveLeft_lf _)
· exact (le_trans h₂ h₁).not_gf (lf_of_lt (hy _ _))
· exact (le_trans h₁ h₂).not_gf (lf_of_lt (hx _ _))
· exact IHxr _ _ (oyr _) (h₁.lf_moveRight _) (h₂.lf_moveRight _)
theorem le_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : x ≤ y :=
not_lf.1 (lf_asymm ox oy h)
alias LF.le := le_of_lf
theorem lt_of_lf {x y : PGame} (h : x ⧏ y) (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : x < y :=
(lt_or_fuzzy_of_lf h).resolve_right (not_fuzzy_of_le (h.le ox oy))
alias LF.lt := lt_of_lf
theorem lf_iff_lt {x y : PGame} (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : x ⧏ y ↔ x < y :=
⟨fun h => h.lt ox oy, lf_of_lt⟩
/-- Definition of `x ≤ y` on numeric pre-games, in terms of `<` -/
theorem le_iff_forall_lt {x y : PGame} (ox : x.Numeric) (oy : y.Numeric) :
x ≤ y ↔ (∀ i, x.moveLeft i < y) ∧ ∀ j, x < y.moveRight j := by
refine le_iff_forall_lf.trans (and_congr ?_ ?_) <;>
refine forall_congr' fun i => lf_iff_lt ?_ ?_ <;>
apply_rules [Numeric.moveLeft, Numeric.moveRight]
/-- Definition of `x < y` on numeric pre-games, in terms of `≤` -/
theorem lt_iff_exists_le {x y : PGame} (ox : x.Numeric) (oy : y.Numeric) :
x < y ↔ (∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y := by
rw [← lf_iff_lt ox oy, lf_iff_exists_le]
theorem lt_of_exists_le {x y : PGame} (ox : x.Numeric) (oy : y.Numeric) :
((∃ i, x ≤ y.moveLeft i) ∨ ∃ j, x.moveRight j ≤ y) → x < y :=
(lt_iff_exists_le ox oy).2
/-- The definition of `x < y` on numeric pre-games, in terms of `<` two moves later. -/
theorem lt_def {x y : PGame} (ox : x.Numeric) (oy : y.Numeric) :
x < y ↔
(∃ i, (∀ i', x.moveLeft i' < y.moveLeft i) ∧ ∀ j, x < (y.moveLeft i).moveRight j) ∨
∃ j, (∀ i, (x.moveRight j).moveLeft i < y) ∧ ∀ j', x.moveRight j < y.moveRight j' := by
rw [← lf_iff_lt ox oy, lf_def]
refine or_congr ?_ ?_ <;> refine exists_congr fun x_1 => ?_ <;> refine and_congr ?_ ?_ <;>
refine forall_congr' fun i => lf_iff_lt ?_ ?_ <;>
apply_rules [Numeric.moveLeft, Numeric.moveRight]
theorem not_fuzzy {x y : PGame} (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : ¬Fuzzy x y :=
fun h => not_lf.2 ((lf_of_fuzzy h).le ox oy) h.2
theorem lt_or_equiv_or_gt {x y : PGame} (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) :
x < y ∨ (x ≈ y) ∨ y < x :=
((lf_or_equiv_or_gf x y).imp fun h => h.lt ox oy) <| Or.imp_right fun h => h.lt oy ox
theorem numeric_of_isEmpty (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] [IsEmpty x.RightMoves] : Numeric x :=
Numeric.mk isEmptyElim isEmptyElim isEmptyElim
theorem numeric_of_isEmpty_leftMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.LeftMoves] :
(∀ j, Numeric (x.moveRight j)) → Numeric x :=
Numeric.mk isEmptyElim isEmptyElim
theorem numeric_of_isEmpty_rightMoves (x : PGame) [IsEmpty x.RightMoves]
(H : ∀ i, Numeric (x.moveLeft i)) : Numeric x :=
Numeric.mk (fun _ => isEmptyElim) H isEmptyElim
theorem numeric_zero : Numeric 0 :=
numeric_of_isEmpty 0
theorem numeric_one : Numeric 1 :=
numeric_of_isEmpty_rightMoves 1 fun _ => numeric_zero
theorem Numeric.neg : ∀ {x : PGame} (_ : Numeric x), Numeric (-x)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, o =>
⟨fun j i => neg_lt_neg_iff.2 (o.1 i j), fun j => (o.2.2 j).neg, fun i => (o.2.1 i).neg⟩
/-- Inserting a smaller numeric left option into a numeric game results in a numeric game. -/
theorem insertLeft_numeric {x x' : PGame} (x_num : x.Numeric) (x'_num : x'.Numeric)
(h : x' ≤ x) : (insertLeft x x').Numeric := by
rw [le_iff_forall_lt x'_num x_num] at h
unfold Numeric at x_num ⊢
rcases x with ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩
simp only [insertLeft, Sum.forall, forall_const, Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr] at x_num ⊢
constructor
· simp only [x_num.1, implies_true, true_and]
simp only [rightMoves_mk, moveRight_mk] at h
exact h.2
· simp only [x_num, implies_true, x'_num, and_self]
/-- Inserting a larger numeric right option into a numeric game results in a numeric game. -/
theorem insertRight_numeric {x x' : PGame} (x_num : x.Numeric) (x'_num : x'.Numeric)
(h : x ≤ x') : (insertRight x x').Numeric := by
rw [← neg_neg (x.insertRight x'), ← neg_insertLeft_neg]
apply Numeric.neg
exact insertLeft_numeric (Numeric.neg x_num) (Numeric.neg x'_num) (neg_le_neg_iff.mpr h)
namespace Numeric
theorem moveLeft_lt {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (i) : x.moveLeft i < x :=
(moveLeft_lf i).lt (o.moveLeft i) o
theorem moveLeft_le {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (i) : x.moveLeft i ≤ x :=
(o.moveLeft_lt i).le
theorem lt_moveRight {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (j) : x < x.moveRight j :=
(lf_moveRight j).lt o (o.moveRight j)
theorem le_moveRight {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (j) : x ≤ x.moveRight j :=
(o.lt_moveRight j).le
theorem add : ∀ {x y : PGame} (_ : Numeric x) (_ : Numeric y), Numeric (x + y)
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩, ⟨yl, yr, yL, yR⟩, ox, oy =>
⟨by
rintro (ix | iy) (jx | jy)
· exact add_lt_add_right (ox.1 ix jx) _
· exact (add_lf_add_of_lf_of_le (lf_mk _ _ ix) (oy.le_moveRight jy)).lt
((ox.moveLeft ix).add oy) (ox.add (oy.moveRight jy))
· exact (add_lf_add_of_lf_of_le (mk_lf _ _ jx) (oy.moveLeft_le iy)).lt
(ox.add (oy.moveLeft iy)) ((ox.moveRight jx).add oy)
· exact add_lt_add_left (oy.1 iy jy) ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩, by
constructor
· rintro (ix | iy)
· exact (ox.moveLeft ix).add oy
· exact ox.add (oy.moveLeft iy)
· rintro (jx | jy)
· apply (ox.moveRight jx).add oy
· apply ox.add (oy.moveRight jy)⟩
termination_by x y => (x, y) -- Porting note: Added `termination_by`
theorem sub {x y : PGame} (ox : Numeric x) (oy : Numeric y) : Numeric (x - y) :=
ox.add oy.neg
end Numeric
/-- Pre-games defined by natural numbers are numeric. -/
theorem numeric_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, Numeric n
| 0 => numeric_zero
| n + 1 => (numeric_nat n).add numeric_one
/-- Ordinal games are numeric. -/
theorem numeric_toPGame (o : Ordinal) : o.toPGame.Numeric := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
apply numeric_of_isEmpty_rightMoves
simpa using fun i => IH _ (Ordinal.toLeftMovesToPGame_symm_lt i)
end PGame
end SetTheory
open SetTheory PGame
/-- The type of surreal numbers. These are the numeric pre-games quotiented
by the equivalence relation `x ≈ y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`. In the quotient,
the order becomes a total order. -/
def Surreal :=
Quotient (inferInstanceAs <| Setoid (Subtype Numeric))
namespace Surreal
/-- Construct a surreal number from a numeric pre-game. -/
def mk (x : PGame) (h : x.Numeric) : Surreal :=
⟦⟨x, h⟩⟧
instance : Zero Surreal :=
⟨mk 0 numeric_zero⟩
instance : One Surreal :=
⟨mk 1 numeric_one⟩
instance : Inhabited Surreal :=
⟨0⟩
lemma mk_eq_mk {x y : PGame.{u}} {hx hy} : mk x hx = mk y hy ↔ x ≈ y := Quotient.eq
lemma mk_eq_zero {x : PGame.{u}} {hx} : mk x hx = 0 ↔ x ≈ 0 := Quotient.eq
/-- Lift an equivalence-respecting function on pre-games to surreals. -/
def lift {α} (f : ∀ x, Numeric x → α)
(H : ∀ {x y} (hx : Numeric x) (hy : Numeric y), x.Equiv y → f x hx = f y hy) : Surreal → α :=
Quotient.lift (fun x : { x // Numeric x } => f x.1 x.2) fun x y => H x.2 y.2
/-- Lift a binary equivalence-respecting function on pre-games to surreals. -/
def lift₂ {α} (f : ∀ x y, Numeric x → Numeric y → α)
(H :
∀ {x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂} (ox₁ : Numeric x₁) (oy₁ : Numeric y₁) (ox₂ : Numeric x₂) (oy₂ : Numeric y₂),
x₁.Equiv x₂ → y₁.Equiv y₂ → f x₁ y₁ ox₁ oy₁ = f x₂ y₂ ox₂ oy₂) :
Surreal → Surreal → α :=
lift (fun x ox => lift (fun y oy => f x y ox oy) fun _ _ => H _ _ _ _ equiv_rfl)
fun _ _ h => funext <| Quotient.ind fun _ => H _ _ _ _ h equiv_rfl
instance instLE : LE Surreal :=
⟨lift₂ (fun x y _ _ => x ≤ y) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (le_congr hx hy)⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_le_mk {x y : PGame.{u}} {hx hy} : mk x hx ≤ mk y hy ↔ x ≤ y := Iff.rfl
lemma zero_le_mk {x : PGame.{u}} {hx} : 0 ≤ mk x hx ↔ 0 ≤ x := Iff.rfl
instance instLT : LT Surreal :=
⟨lift₂ (fun x y _ _ => x < y) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lt_congr hx hy)⟩
lemma mk_lt_mk {x y : PGame.{u}} {hx hy} : mk x hx < mk y hy ↔ x < y := Iff.rfl
lemma zero_lt_mk {x : PGame.{u}} {hx} : 0 < mk x hx ↔ 0 < x := Iff.rfl
/-- Same as `moveLeft_lt`, but for `Surreal` instead of `PGame` -/
theorem mk_moveLeft_lt_mk {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (i) :
Surreal.mk (x.moveLeft i) (Numeric.moveLeft o i) < Surreal.mk x o := Numeric.moveLeft_lt o i
/-- Same as `lt_moveRight`, but for `Surreal` instead of `PGame` -/
theorem mk_lt_mk_moveRight {x : PGame} (o : Numeric x) (j) :
Surreal.mk x o < Surreal.mk (x.moveRight j) (Numeric.moveRight o j) := Numeric.lt_moveRight o j
/-- Addition on surreals is inherited from pre-game addition:
the sum of `x = {xL | xR}` and `y = {yL | yR}` is `{xL + y, x + yL | xR + y, x + yR}`. -/
instance : Add Surreal :=
⟨Surreal.lift₂ (fun (x y : PGame) ox oy => ⟦⟨x + y, ox.add oy⟩⟧) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
Quotient.sound (add_congr hx hy)⟩
/-- Negation for surreal numbers is inherited from pre-game negation:
the negation of `{L | R}` is `{-R | -L}`. -/
instance : Neg Surreal :=
⟨Surreal.lift (fun x ox => ⟦⟨-x, ox.neg⟩⟧) fun _ _ a => Quotient.sound (neg_equiv_neg_iff.2 a)⟩
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup Surreal where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; exact Quotient.sound add_assoc_equiv
zero := 0
zero_add := by rintro ⟨a⟩; exact Quotient.sound (zero_add_equiv a)
add_zero := by rintro ⟨a⟩; exact Quotient.sound (add_zero_equiv a)
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by rintro ⟨a⟩; exact Quotient.sound (neg_add_cancel_equiv a)
add_comm := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; exact Quotient.sound add_comm_equiv
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Surreal where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
le_refl := by rintro ⟨_⟩; apply @le_rfl PGame
le_trans := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; apply @le_trans PGame
lt_iff_le_not_le := by rintro ⟨_, ox⟩ ⟨_, oy⟩; apply @lt_iff_le_not_le PGame
le_antisymm := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ h₁ h₂; exact Quotient.sound ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid Surreal where
add_le_add_left := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ hx ⟨_⟩; exact @add_le_add_left PGame _ _ _ _ _ hx _
lemma mk_add {x y : PGame} (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) :
Surreal.mk (x + y) (hx.add hy) = Surreal.mk x hx + Surreal.mk y hy := by rfl
lemma mk_sub {x y : PGame} (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) :
Surreal.mk (x - y) (hx.sub hy) = Surreal.mk x hx - Surreal.mk y hy := by rfl
lemma zero_def : 0 = mk 0 numeric_zero := by rfl
noncomputable instance : LinearOrder Surreal :=
{ Surreal.partialOrder with
le_total := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, ox⟩⟩ ⟨⟨y, oy⟩⟩
exact or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => (PGame.not_le.1 h).le oy ox
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
instance : AddMonoidWithOne Surreal :=
AddMonoidWithOne.unary
/-- Casts a `Surreal` number into a `Game`. -/
def toGame : Surreal →+o Game where
toFun := lift (fun x _ => ⟦x⟧) fun _ _ => Quot.sound
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := by rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩; rfl
monotone' := by rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩; exact id
@[simp]
theorem zero_toGame : toGame 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_toGame : toGame 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nat_toGame : ∀ n : ℕ, toGame n = n :=
map_natCast' _ one_toGame
/-- A small family of surreals is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Surreal.{u}) :
BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
induction' f using Quotient.induction_on_pi with f
let g : ι → PGame.{u} := Subtype.val ∘ f
have hg (i) : (g i).Numeric := Subtype.prop _
conv in (⟦f _⟧) =>
change mk (g i) (hg i)
clear_value g
clear f
let x : PGame.{u} := ⟨Σ i, (g <| (equivShrink.{u} ι).symm i).LeftMoves, PEmpty,
fun x ↦ moveLeft _ x.2, PEmpty.elim⟩
refine ⟨mk x (.mk (by simp [x]) (fun _ ↦ (hg _).moveLeft _) (by simp [x])),
Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
rw [mk_le_mk, ← (equivShrink ι).symm_apply_apply i, le_iff_forall_lf]
simpa [x] using fun j ↦ @moveLeft_lf x ⟨equivShrink ι i, j⟩
|
/-- A small set of surreals is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Surreal.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Basic.lean | 413 | 415 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Unbounded lattice homomorphisms
This file defines unbounded lattice homomorphisms. _Bounded_ lattice homomorphisms are defined in
`Mathlib.Order.Hom.BoundedLattice`.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `SupHom`: Maps which preserve `⊔`.
* `InfHom`: Maps which preserve `⊓`.
* `LatticeHom`: Lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊓`.
## Typeclasses
* `SupHomClass`
* `InfHomClass`
* `LatticeHomClass`
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊔`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure SupHom (α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] where
/-- The underlying function of a `SupHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- A `SupHom` preserves suprema.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_sup` instead. -/
map_sup' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊔ b) = toFun a ⊔ toFun b
/-- The type of `⊓`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure InfHom (α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `InfHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- An `InfHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
/-- The type of lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure LatticeHom (α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] extends SupHom α β where
/-- A `LatticeHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
-- TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
initialize_simps_projections LatticeHom (+toSupHom, -toFun)
section
/-- `SupHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊔`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupHom`. -/
class SupHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- A `SupHomClass` morphism preserves suprema. -/
map_sup (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b
/-- `InfHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊓`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `InfHom`. -/
class InfHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- An `InfHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
/-- `LatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `LatticeHom`. -/
class LatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends SupHomClass F α β where
/-- A `LatticeHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
end
export SupHomClass (map_sup)
export InfHomClass (map_inf)
attribute [simp] map_sup map_inf
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SupHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[SupHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹SupHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← sup_eq_right, ← map_sup, sup_eq_right.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InfHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[InfHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹InfHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← inf_eq_left, ← map_inf, inf_eq_left.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LatticeHomClass.toInfHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[LatticeHomClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹LatticeHomClass F α β› with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : SupHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sup := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sup_le_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_inf := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_inf_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : LatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass with }
end Equiv
section OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- We can regard an injective map preserving binary infima as an order embedding. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderEmbeddingOfInjective [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : F) [InfHomClass F α β]
(hf : Injective f) : α ↪o β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff f (fun x y ↦ by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ OrderHomClass.mono f h⟩
rwa [← inf_eq_left, ← hf.eq_iff, map_inf, inf_eq_left])
end OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance [Max α] [Max β] [SupHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sup f⟩⟩
instance [Min α] [Min β] [InfHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (InfHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_inf f⟩⟩
instance [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (LatticeHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f }⟩
/-! ### Supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace SupHom
variable [Max α]
section Sup
variable [Max β] [Max γ] [Max δ]
instance : FunLike (SupHom α β) α β where
coe := SupHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : SupHomClass (SupHom α β) α β where
map_sup := SupHom.map_sup'
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : SupHom α β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : SupHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `SupHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : SupHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := h.symm ▸ f.map_sup'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `SupHom`. -/
protected def id : SupHom α α :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
instance : Inhabited (SupHom α α) :=
⟨SupHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(SupHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : SupHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `SupHom`s as a `SupHom`. -/
def comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : SupHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_sup' a b := by rw [comp_apply, map_sup, map_sup]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : SupHom γ δ) (g : SupHom β γ) (h : SupHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id (f : SupHom α β) : f.comp (SupHom.id α) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp (f : SupHom α β) : (SupHom.id β).comp f = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : SupHom β γ} {f : SupHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun h => congr_arg₂ _ h rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : SupHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : SupHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← SupHom.comp_apply, h, SupHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Sup
variable (α) [SemilatticeSup β]
/-- The constant function as a `SupHom`. -/
def const (b : β) : SupHom α β := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, fun _ _ ↦ (sup_idem _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b :=
rfl
variable {α}
instance : Max (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun a b => by
rw [Pi.sup_apply, map_sup, map_sup]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (SupHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeSup _) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Bot β] : Bot (SupHom α β) :=
⟨SupHom.const α ⊥⟩
instance [Top β] : Top (SupHom α β) :=
⟨SupHom.const α ⊤⟩
instance [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (SupHom α β) :=
OrderBot.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (SupHom α β) :=
OrderTop.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [BoundedOrder β] : BoundedOrder (SupHom α β) :=
BoundedOrder.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (f g : SupHom α β) : DFunLike.coe (f ⊔ g) = f ⊔ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot [Bot β] : ⇑(⊥ : SupHom α β) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_top [Top β] : ⇑(⊤ : SupHom α β) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (f g : SupHom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_apply [Bot β] (a : α) : (⊥ : SupHom α β) a = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply [Top β] (a : α) : (⊤ : SupHom α β) a = ⊤ :=
rfl
/-- `Subtype.val` as a `SupHom`. -/
def subtypeVal {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) :
letI := Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup
SupHom {x : β // P x} β :=
letI := Subtype.semilatticeSup Psup
.mk Subtype.val (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_apply {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) (x : {x : β // P x}) :
subtypeVal Psup x = x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_coe {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) :
⇑(subtypeVal Psup) = Subtype.val := rfl
end SupHom
/-! ### Infimum homomorphisms -/
namespace InfHom
variable [Min α]
section Inf
variable [Min β] [Min γ] [Min δ]
instance : FunLike (InfHom α β) α β where
coe := InfHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : InfHomClass (InfHom α β) α β where
map_inf := InfHom.map_inf'
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : InfHom α β) : f.toFun = (f : α → β) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : InfHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of an `InfHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : InfHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : InfHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_inf' := h.symm ▸ f.map_inf'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : InfHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : InfHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as an `InfHom`. -/
protected def id : InfHom α α :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
instance : Inhabited (InfHom α α) :=
⟨InfHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(InfHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : InfHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `InfHom`s as an `InfHom`. -/
def comp (f : InfHom β γ) (g : InfHom α β) : InfHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_inf' a b := by rw [comp_apply, map_inf, map_inf]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : InfHom β γ) (g : InfHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : InfHom β γ) (g : InfHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : InfHom γ δ) (g : InfHom β γ) (h : InfHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id (f : InfHom α β) : f.comp (InfHom.id α) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp (f : InfHom α β) : (InfHom.id β).comp f = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : InfHom β γ} {f : InfHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => InfHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun h => congr_arg₂ _ h rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : InfHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : InfHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => InfHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← InfHom.comp_apply, h, InfHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Inf
variable (α) [SemilatticeInf β]
/-- The constant function as an `InfHom`. -/
def const (b : β) : InfHom α β := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, fun _ _ ↦ (inf_idem _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b :=
rfl
variable {α}
instance : Min (InfHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊓ g, fun a b => by
rw [Pi.inf_apply, map_inf, map_inf]
exact inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (InfHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeInf _) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Bot β] : Bot (InfHom α β) :=
⟨InfHom.const α ⊥⟩
instance [Top β] : Top (InfHom α β) :=
⟨InfHom.const α ⊤⟩
instance [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (InfHom α β) :=
OrderBot.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (InfHom α β) :=
OrderTop.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [BoundedOrder β] : BoundedOrder (InfHom α β) :=
BoundedOrder.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf (f g : InfHom α β) : DFunLike.coe (f ⊓ g) = f ⊓ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot [Bot β] : ⇑(⊥ : InfHom α β) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_top [Top β] : ⇑(⊤ : InfHom α β) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (f g : InfHom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_apply [Bot β] (a : α) : (⊥ : InfHom α β) a = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply [Top β] (a : α) : (⊤ : InfHom α β) a = ⊤ :=
rfl
/-- `Subtype.val` as an `InfHom`. -/
def subtypeVal {P : β → Prop}
(Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) :
letI := Subtype.semilatticeInf Pinf
InfHom {x : β // P x} β :=
letI := Subtype.semilatticeInf Pinf
.mk Subtype.val (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_apply {P : β → Prop}
(Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) (x : {x : β // P x}) :
subtypeVal Pinf x = x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_coe {P : β → Prop}
(Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y : β⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) :
⇑(subtypeVal Pinf) = Subtype.val := rfl
end InfHom
/-! ### Lattice homomorphisms -/
namespace LatticeHom
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [Lattice γ] [Lattice δ]
/-- Reinterpret a `LatticeHom` as an `InfHom`. -/
def toInfHom (f : LatticeHom α β) : InfHom α β :=
{ f with }
instance : FunLike (LatticeHom α β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr
instance : LatticeHomClass (LatticeHom α β) α β where
map_sup f := f.map_sup'
map_inf f := f.map_inf'
lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : LatticeHom α β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_toSupHom (f : LatticeHom α β) : ⇑f.toSupHom = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_toInfHom (f : LatticeHom α β) : ⇑f.toInfHom = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (f : SupHom α β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : LatticeHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `LatticeHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : LatticeHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : LatticeHom α β :=
{ f.toSupHom.copy f' h, f.toInfHom.copy f' h with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : LatticeHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : LatticeHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `LatticeHom`. -/
protected def id : LatticeHom α α where
toFun := id
map_sup' _ _ := rfl
map_inf' _ _ := rfl
instance : Inhabited (LatticeHom α α) :=
⟨LatticeHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(LatticeHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : LatticeHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `LatticeHom`s as a `LatticeHom`. -/
def comp (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) : LatticeHom α γ :=
{ f.toSupHom.comp g.toSupHom, f.toInfHom.comp g.toInfHom with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
-- `simp`-normal form of `coe_comp_sup_hom`
theorem coe_comp_sup_hom' (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) :
⟨f ∘ g, map_sup (f.comp g)⟩ = (f : SupHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
theorem coe_comp_sup_hom (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) :
(f.comp g : SupHom α γ) = (f : SupHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[simp]
-- `simp`-normal form of `coe_comp_inf_hom`
theorem coe_comp_inf_hom' (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) :
⟨f ∘ g, map_inf (f.comp g)⟩ = (f : InfHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
theorem coe_comp_inf_hom (f : LatticeHom β γ) (g : LatticeHom α β) :
(f.comp g : InfHom α γ) = (f : InfHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : LatticeHom γ δ) (g : LatticeHom β γ) (h : LatticeHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : LatticeHom α β) : f.comp (LatticeHom.id α) = f :=
LatticeHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : LatticeHom α β) : (LatticeHom.id β).comp f = f :=
LatticeHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : LatticeHom β γ} {f : LatticeHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => LatticeHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun h => congr_arg₂ _ h rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : LatticeHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : LatticeHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => LatticeHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← LatticeHom.comp_apply, h, LatticeHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
/-- `Subtype.val` as a `LatticeHom`. -/
def subtypeVal {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) (Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) :
letI := Subtype.lattice Psup Pinf
LatticeHom {x : β // P x} β :=
letI := Subtype.lattice Psup Pinf
.mk (SupHom.subtypeVal Psup) (by simp [Subtype.coe_inf Pinf])
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_apply {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) (Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y))
(x : {x : β // P x}) :
subtypeVal Psup Pinf x = x := rfl
@[simp]
lemma subtypeVal_coe {P : β → Prop}
(Psup : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊔ y)) (Pinf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P x → P y → P (x ⊓ y)) :
⇑(subtypeVal Psup Pinf) = Subtype.val := rfl
end LatticeHom
namespace OrderHomClass
variable (α β)
variable [LinearOrder α] [Lattice β] [OrderHomClass F α β]
/-- An order homomorphism from a linear order is a lattice homomorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) toLatticeHomClass : LatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹OrderHomClass F α β› with
map_sup := fun f a b => by
obtain h | h := le_total a b
· rw [sup_eq_right.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 (OrderHomClass.mono f h : f a ≤ f b)]
· rw [sup_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_left.2 (OrderHomClass.mono f h : f b ≤ f a)]
map_inf := fun f a b => by
obtain h | h := le_total a b
· rw [inf_eq_left.2 h, inf_eq_left.2 (OrderHomClass.mono f h : f a ≤ f b)]
· rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_eq_right.2 (OrderHomClass.mono f h : f b ≤ f a)] }
/-- Reinterpret an order homomorphism to a linear order as a `LatticeHom`. -/
def toLatticeHom (f : F) : LatticeHom α β := f
@[simp]
theorem coe_to_lattice_hom (f : F) : ⇑(toLatticeHom α β f) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem to_lattice_hom_apply (f : F) (a : α) : toLatticeHom α β f a = f a :=
rfl
end OrderHomClass
/-! ### Dual homs -/
namespace SupHom
variable [Max α] [Max β] [Max γ]
/-- Reinterpret a supremum homomorphism as an infimum homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual : SupHom α β ≃ InfHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨f, f.map_sup'⟩
invFun f := ⟨f, f.map_inf'⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : SupHom.dual (SupHom.id α) = InfHom.id _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : SupHom β γ) (f : SupHom α β) :
SupHom.dual (g.comp f) = (SupHom.dual g).comp (SupHom.dual f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : SupHom.dual.symm (InfHom.id _) = SupHom.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : InfHom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : InfHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
SupHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) =
(SupHom.dual.symm g).comp (SupHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
end SupHom
namespace InfHom
variable [Min α] [Min β] [Min γ]
/-- Reinterpret an infimum homomorphism as a supremum homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual : InfHom α β ≃ SupHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨f, f.map_inf'⟩
invFun f := ⟨f, f.map_sup'⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : InfHom.dual (InfHom.id α) = SupHom.id _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : InfHom β γ) (f : InfHom α β) :
InfHom.dual (g.comp f) = (InfHom.dual g).comp (InfHom.dual f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : InfHom.dual.symm (SupHom.id _) = InfHom.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : SupHom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : SupHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
InfHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) =
(InfHom.dual.symm g).comp (InfHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
end InfHom
namespace LatticeHom
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [Lattice γ]
/-- Reinterpret a lattice homomorphism as a lattice homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual : LatticeHom α β ≃ LatticeHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨InfHom.dual f.toInfHom, f.map_sup'⟩
invFun f := ⟨SupHom.dual.symm f.toInfHom, f.map_sup'⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_id : LatticeHom.dual (LatticeHom.id α) = LatticeHom.id _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : LatticeHom β γ) (f : LatticeHom α β) :
LatticeHom.dual (g.comp f) = (LatticeHom.dual g).comp (LatticeHom.dual f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : LatticeHom.dual.symm (LatticeHom.id _) = LatticeHom.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : LatticeHom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : LatticeHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
LatticeHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) =
(LatticeHom.dual.symm g).comp (LatticeHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
end LatticeHom
/-! ### Prod -/
namespace LatticeHom
variable [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
/-- Natural projection homomorphism from `α × β` to `α`. -/
def fst : LatticeHom (α × β) α where
toFun := Prod.fst
map_sup' _ _ := rfl
map_inf' _ _ := rfl
/-- Natural projection homomorphism from `α × β` to `β`. -/
def snd : LatticeHom (α × β) β where
toFun := Prod.snd
map_sup' _ _ := rfl
map_inf' _ _ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : ⇑(fst (α := α) (β := β)) = Prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : ⇑(snd (α := α) (β := β)) = Prod.snd := rfl
lemma fst_apply (x : α × β) : fst x = x.fst := rfl
lemma snd_apply (x : α × β) : snd x = x.snd := rfl
end LatticeHom
/-! ### Pi -/
namespace Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Lattice (α i)]
/-- Evaluation as a lattice homomorphism. -/
def evalLatticeHom (i : ι) : LatticeHom (∀ i, α i) (α i) where
toFun := Function.eval i
map_sup' _a _b := rfl
map_inf' _a _b := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_evalLatticeHom (i : ι) : ⇑(evalLatticeHom (α := α) i) = Function.eval i := rfl
lemma evalLatticeHom_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, α i) : evalLatticeHom i f = f i := rfl
end Pi
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Lattice.lean | 1,352 | 1,354 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
/-!
# Making a sequence disjoint
This file defines the way to make a sequence of sets - or, more generally, a map from a partially
ordered type `ι` into a (generalized) Boolean algebra `α` - into a *pairwise disjoint* sequence with
the same partial sups.
For a sequence `f : ℕ → α`, this new sequence will be `f 0`, `f 1 \ f 0`, `f 2 \ (f 0 ⊔ f 1) ⋯`.
It is actually unique, as `disjointed_unique` shows.
## Main declarations
* `disjointed f`: The map sending `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. We require the index type to be a
`LocallyFiniteOrderBot` to ensure that the supremum is well defined.
* `partialSups_disjointed`: `disjointed f` has the same partial sups as `f`.
* `disjoint_disjointed`: The elements of `disjointed f` are pairwise disjoint.
* `disjointed_unique`: `disjointed f` is the only pairwise disjoint sequence having the same partial
sups as `f`.
* `Fintype.sup_disjointed` (for finite `ι`) or `iSup_disjointed` (for complete `α`):
`disjointed f` has the same supremum as `f`. Limiting case of `partialSups_disjointed`.
* `Fintype.exists_disjointed_le`: for any finite family `f : ι → α`, there exists a pairwise
disjoint family `g : ι → α` which is bounded above by `f` and has the same supremum. This is
an analogue of `disjointed` for arbitrary finite index types (but without any uniqueness).
We also provide set notation variants of some lemmas.
-/
assert_not_exists SuccAddOrder
open Finset Order
variable {α ι : Type*}
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
section Preorder -- the *index type* is a preorder
variable [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
/-- The function mapping `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. When `ι` is a partial order, this is the
unique function `g` having the same `partialSups` as `f` and such that `g i` and `g j` are
disjoint whenever `i < j`. -/
def disjointed (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : α := f i \ (Iio i).sup f
lemma disjointed_apply (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : disjointed f i = f i \ (Iio i).sup f := rfl
lemma disjointed_of_isMin (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hn : IsMin i) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
have : Iio i = ∅ := by rwa [← Finset.coe_eq_empty, coe_Iio, Set.Iio_eq_empty_iff]
simp only [disjointed_apply, this, sup_empty, sdiff_bot]
@[simp] lemma disjointed_bot [OrderBot ι] (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ⊥ = f ⊥ :=
disjointed_of_isMin _ isMin_bot
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ι → α) → ι → α) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le
theorem disjointed_le (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
theorem disjoint_disjointed_of_lt (f : ι → α) {i j : ι} (h : i < j) :
Disjoint (disjointed f i) (disjointed f j) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left <| le_sup (mem_Iio.mpr h)).mono_left (disjointed_le f i)
lemma disjointed_eq_self {f : ι → α} {i : ι} (hf : ∀ j < i, Disjoint (f j) (f i)) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
rw [disjointed_apply, sdiff_eq_left, disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_left,
sup_congr rfl <| fun j hj ↦ disjoint_iff.mp <| (hf _ (mem_Iio.mp hj)).symm]
exact sup_bot _
/- NB: The original statement for `ι = ℕ` was a `def` and worked for `p : α → Sort*`. I couldn't
prove the `Sort*` version for general `ι`, but all instances of `disjointedRec` in the library are
for Prop anyway. -/
/--
An induction principle for `disjointed`. To prove something about `disjointed f i`, it's
enough to prove it for `f i` and being able to extend through diffs.
-/
lemma disjointedRec {f : ι → α} {p : α → Prop} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, p (f i) → p (disjointed f i) := by
classical
intro i hpi
rw [disjointed]
suffices ∀ (s : Finset ι), p (f i \ s.sup f) from this _
intro s
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simpa only [sup_empty, sdiff_bot] using hpi
| insert _ _ ht IH =>
rw [sup_insert, sup_comm, ← sdiff_sdiff]
exact hdiff IH
end Preorder
section PartialOrder -- the index type is a partial order
variable [PartialOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
| @[simp]
theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ι → α) :
partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 109 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
/-!
# Euclidean algorithm for ℕ
This file sets up a version of the Euclidean algorithm that only works with natural numbers.
Given `0 < a, b`, it computes the unique `(w, x, y, z, d)` such that the following identities hold:
* `a = (w + x) d`
* `b = (y + z) d`
* `w * z = x * y + 1`
`d` is then the gcd of `a` and `b`, and `a' := a / d = w + x` and `b' := b / d = y + z` are coprime.
This story is closely related to the structure of SL₂(ℕ) (as a free monoid on two generators) and
the theory of continued fractions.
## Main declarations
* `XgcdType`: Helper type in defining the gcd. Encapsulates `(wp, x, y, zp, ap, bp)`. where `wp`
`zp`, `ap`, `bp` are the variables getting changed through the algorithm.
* `IsSpecial`: States `wp * zp = x * y + 1`
* `IsReduced`: States `ap = a ∧ bp = b`
## Notes
See `Nat.Xgcd` for a very similar algorithm allowing values in `ℤ`.
-/
open Nat
namespace PNat
/-- A term of `XgcdType` is a system of six naturals. They should
be thought of as representing the matrix
[[w, x], [y, z]] = [[wp + 1, x], [y, zp + 1]]
together with the vector [a, b] = [ap + 1, bp + 1].
-/
structure XgcdType where
/-- `wp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
wp : ℕ
/-- `x` satisfies `a / d = w + x` at the final step. -/
x : ℕ
/-- `y` satisfies `b / d = z + y` at the final step. -/
y : ℕ
/-- `zp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
zp : ℕ
/-- `ap` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
ap : ℕ
/-- `bp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
bp : ℕ
deriving Inhabited
namespace XgcdType
variable (u : XgcdType)
instance : SizeOf XgcdType :=
⟨fun u => u.bp⟩
/-- The `Repr` instance converts terms to strings in a way that
reflects the matrix/vector interpretation as above. -/
instance : Repr XgcdType where
reprPrec
| g, _ => s!"[[[{repr (g.wp + 1)}, {repr g.x}], \
[{repr g.y}, {repr (g.zp + 1)}]], \
[{repr (g.ap + 1)}, {repr (g.bp + 1)}]]"
/-- Another `mk` using ℕ and ℕ+ -/
def mk' (w : ℕ+) (x : ℕ) (y : ℕ) (z : ℕ+) (a : ℕ+) (b : ℕ+) : XgcdType :=
mk w.val.pred x y z.val.pred a.val.pred b.val.pred
/-- `w = wp + 1` -/
def w : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.wp
/-- `z = zp + 1` -/
def z : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.zp
/-- `a = ap + 1` -/
def a : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.ap
/-- `b = bp + 1` -/
def b : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.bp
/-- `r = a % b`: remainder -/
def r : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) % (u.bp + 1)
/-- `q = ap / bp`: quotient -/
def q : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) / (u.bp + 1)
/-- `qp = q - 1` -/
def qp : ℕ :=
u.q - 1
/-- The map `v` gives the product of the matrix
[[w, x], [y, z]] = [[wp + 1, x], [y, zp + 1]]
and the vector [a, b] = [ap + 1, bp + 1]. The map
`vp` gives [sp, tp] such that v = [sp + 1, tp + 1].
-/
def vp : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.wp + u.x + u.ap + u.wp * u.ap + u.x * u.bp, u.y + u.zp + u.bp + u.y * u.ap + u.zp * u.bp⟩
/-- `v = [sp + 1, tp + 1]`, check `vp` -/
def v : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b, u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b⟩
/-- `succ₂ [t.1, t.2] = [t.1.succ, t.2.succ]` -/
def succ₂ (t : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨t.1.succ, t.2.succ⟩
theorem v_eq_succ_vp : u.v = succ₂ u.vp := by
ext <;> dsimp [v, vp, w, z, a, b, succ₂] <;> ring_nf
/-- `IsSpecial` holds if the matrix has determinant one. -/
def IsSpecial : Prop :=
u.wp + u.zp + u.wp * u.zp = u.x * u.y
/-- `IsSpecial'` is an alternative of `IsSpecial`. -/
def IsSpecial' : Prop :=
u.w * u.z = succPNat (u.x * u.y)
theorem isSpecial_iff : u.IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial' := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, IsSpecial']
let ⟨wp, x, y, zp, ap, bp⟩ := u
constructor <;> intro h <;> simp only [w, succPNat, succ_eq_add_one, z] at * <;>
simp only [← coe_inj, mul_coe, mk_coe] at *
· simp_all [← h]; ring
· simp [Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_mul, ← Nat.add_assoc] at h; rw [← h]; ring
/-- `IsReduced` holds if the two entries in the vector are the
same. The reduction algorithm will produce a system with this
property, whose product vector is the same as for the original
system. -/
def IsReduced : Prop :=
u.ap = u.bp
/-- `IsReduced'` is an alternative of `IsReduced`. -/
def IsReduced' : Prop :=
u.a = u.b
theorem isReduced_iff : u.IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced' :=
succPNat_inj.symm
/-- `flip` flips the placement of variables during the algorithm. -/
def flip : XgcdType where
wp := u.zp
x := u.y
y := u.x
zp := u.wp
ap := u.bp
bp := u.ap
@[simp]
theorem flip_w : (flip u).w = u.z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_x : (flip u).x = u.y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_y : (flip u).y = u.x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_z : (flip u).z = u.w :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_a : (flip u).a = u.b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem flip_b : (flip u).b = u.a :=
rfl
theorem flip_isReduced : (flip u).IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced := by
dsimp [IsReduced, flip]
constructor <;> intro h <;> exact h.symm
theorem flip_isSpecial : (flip u).IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, flip]
rw [mul_comm u.x, mul_comm u.zp, add_comm u.zp]
theorem flip_v : (flip u).v = u.v.swap := by
dsimp [v]
ext
· simp only
ring
· simp only
ring
/-- Properties of division with remainder for a / b. -/
theorem rq_eq : u.r + (u.bp + 1) * u.q = u.ap + 1 :=
Nat.mod_add_div (u.ap + 1) (u.bp + 1)
theorem qp_eq (hr : u.r = 0) : u.q = u.qp + 1 := by
by_cases hq : u.q = 0
· let h := u.rq_eq
rw [hr, hq, mul_zero, add_zero] at h
cases h
· exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hq)).symm
/-- The following function provides the starting point for
our algorithm. We will apply an iterative reduction process
to it, which will produce a system satisfying IsReduced.
The gcd can be read off from this final system.
-/
def start (a b : ℕ+) : XgcdType :=
⟨0, 0, 0, 0, a - 1, b - 1⟩
theorem start_isSpecial (a b : ℕ+) : (start a b).IsSpecial := by
dsimp [start, IsSpecial]
theorem start_v (a b : ℕ+) : (start a b).v = ⟨a, b⟩ := by
dsimp [start, v, XgcdType.a, XgcdType.b, w, z]
rw [one_mul, one_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]
have := a.pos
have := b.pos
congr <;> omega
/-- `finish` happens when the reducing process ends. -/
def finish : XgcdType :=
XgcdType.mk u.wp ((u.wp + 1) * u.qp + u.x) u.y (u.y * u.qp + u.zp) u.bp u.bp
theorem finish_isReduced : u.finish.IsReduced := by
dsimp [IsReduced]
rfl
theorem finish_isSpecial (hs : u.IsSpecial) : u.finish.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, finish] at hs ⊢
rw [add_mul _ _ u.y, add_comm _ (u.x * u.y), ← hs]
ring
theorem finish_v (hr : u.r = 0) : u.finish.v = u.v := by
let ha : u.r + u.b * u.q = u.a := u.rq_eq
rw [hr, zero_add] at ha
ext
· change (u.wp + 1) * u.b + ((u.wp + 1) * u.qp + u.x) * u.b = u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b
have : u.wp + 1 = u.w := rfl
rw [this, ← ha, u.qp_eq hr]
ring
· change u.y * u.b + (u.y * u.qp + u.z) * u.b = u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b
rw [← ha, u.qp_eq hr]
ring
/-- This is the main reduction step, which is used when u.r ≠ 0, or
equivalently b does not divide a. -/
def step : XgcdType :=
XgcdType.mk (u.y * u.q + u.zp) u.y ((u.wp + 1) * u.q + u.x) u.wp u.bp (u.r - 1)
/-- We will apply the above step recursively. The following result
is used to ensure that the process terminates. -/
theorem step_wf (hr : u.r ≠ 0) : SizeOf.sizeOf u.step < SizeOf.sizeOf u := by
change u.r - 1 < u.bp
have h₀ : u.r - 1 + 1 = u.r := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hr)
have h₁ : u.r < u.bp + 1 := Nat.mod_lt (u.ap + 1) u.bp.succ_pos
rw [← h₀] at h₁
exact lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁
theorem step_isSpecial (hs : u.IsSpecial) : u.step.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, step] at hs ⊢
rw [mul_add, mul_comm u.y u.x, ← hs]
ring
/-- The reduction step does not change the product vector. -/
theorem step_v (hr : u.r ≠ 0) : u.step.v = u.v.swap := by
let ha : u.r + u.b * u.q = u.a := u.rq_eq
let hr : u.r - 1 + 1 = u.r := (add_comm _ 1).trans (add_tsub_cancel_of_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hr))
ext
· change ((u.y * u.q + u.z) * u.b + u.y * (u.r - 1 + 1) : ℕ) = u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b
rw [← ha, hr]
ring
· change ((u.w * u.q + u.x) * u.b + u.w * (u.r - 1 + 1) : ℕ) = u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b
rw [← ha, hr]
ring
/-- We can now define the full reduction function, which applies
step as long as possible, and then applies finish. Note that the
"have" statement puts a fact in the local context, and the
equation compiler uses this fact to help construct the full
definition in terms of well-founded recursion. The same fact
needs to be introduced in all the inductive proofs of properties
given below. -/
def reduce (u : XgcdType) : XgcdType :=
dite (u.r = 0) (fun _ => u.finish) fun _h =>
flip (reduce u.step)
decreasing_by apply u.step_wf _h
theorem reduce_a {u : XgcdType} (h : u.r = 0) : u.reduce = u.finish := by
rw [reduce]
exact if_pos h
theorem reduce_b {u : XgcdType} (h : u.r ≠ 0) : u.reduce = u.step.reduce.flip := by
rw [reduce]
exact if_neg h
theorem reduce_isReduced : ∀ u : XgcdType, u.reduce.IsReduced
| u =>
dite (u.r = 0)
(fun h => by
rw [reduce_a h]
exact u.finish_isReduced)
fun h => by
have : SizeOf.sizeOf u.step < SizeOf.sizeOf u := u.step_wf h
rw [reduce_b h, flip_isReduced]
apply reduce_isReduced
theorem reduce_isReduced' (u : XgcdType) : u.reduce.IsReduced' :=
(isReduced_iff _).mp u.reduce_isReduced
theorem reduce_isSpecial : ∀ u : XgcdType, u.IsSpecial → u.reduce.IsSpecial
| u =>
dite (u.r = 0)
(fun h hs => by
rw [reduce_a h]
exact u.finish_isSpecial hs)
fun h hs => by
have : SizeOf.sizeOf u.step < SizeOf.sizeOf u := u.step_wf h
rw [reduce_b h]
exact (flip_isSpecial _).mpr (reduce_isSpecial _ (u.step_isSpecial hs))
theorem reduce_isSpecial' (u : XgcdType) (hs : u.IsSpecial) : u.reduce.IsSpecial' :=
(isSpecial_iff _).mp (u.reduce_isSpecial hs)
theorem reduce_v : ∀ u : XgcdType, u.reduce.v = u.v
| u =>
dite (u.r = 0) (fun h => by rw [reduce_a h, finish_v u h]) fun h => by
have : SizeOf.sizeOf u.step < SizeOf.sizeOf u := u.step_wf h
rw [reduce_b h, flip_v, reduce_v (step u), step_v u h, Prod.swap_swap]
end XgcdType
section gcd
variable (a b : ℕ+)
/-- Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
def xgcd : XgcdType :=
(XgcdType.start a b).reduce
/-- `gcdD a b = gcd a b` -/
def gcdD : ℕ+ :=
(xgcd a b).a
/-- Final value of `w` -/
def gcdW : ℕ+ :=
(xgcd a b).w
/-- Final value of `x` -/
def gcdX : ℕ :=
(xgcd a b).x
/-- Final value of `y` -/
def gcdY : ℕ :=
(xgcd a b).y
/-- Final value of `z` -/
def gcdZ : ℕ+ :=
(xgcd a b).z
/-- Final value of `a / d` -/
| def gcdA' : ℕ+ :=
succPNat ((xgcd a b).wp + (xgcd a b).x)
/-- Final value of `b / d` -/
def gcdB' : ℕ+ :=
succPNat ((xgcd a b).y + (xgcd a b).zp)
theorem gcdA'_coe : (gcdA' a b : ℕ) = gcdW a b + gcdX a b := by
dsimp [gcdA', gcdX, gcdW, XgcdType.w]
rw [add_right_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Xgcd.lean | 374 | 383 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.HomCongr
/-!
# Reflective functors
Basic properties of reflective functors, especially those relating to their essential image.
Note properties of reflective functors relating to limits and colimits are included in
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Limits`.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Adjunction
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} {E : Type u₃}
variable [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] [Category.{v₃} E]
/--
A functor is *reflective*, or *a reflective inclusion*, if it is fully faithful and right adjoint.
-/
class Reflective (R : D ⥤ C) extends R.Full, R.Faithful where
/-- a choice of a left adjoint to `R` -/
L : C ⥤ D
/-- `R` is a right adjoint -/
adj : L ⊣ R
variable (i : D ⥤ C)
/-- The reflector `C ⥤ D` when `R : D ⥤ C` is reflective. -/
def reflector [Reflective i] : C ⥤ D := Reflective.L (R := i)
/-- The adjunction `reflector i ⊣ i` when `i` is reflective. -/
def reflectorAdjunction [Reflective i] : reflector i ⊣ i := Reflective.adj
instance [Reflective i] : i.IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨reflectorAdjunction i⟩⟩
instance [Reflective i] : (reflector i).IsLeftAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨reflectorAdjunction i⟩⟩
/-- A reflective functor is fully faithful. -/
def Functor.fullyFaithfulOfReflective [Reflective i] : i.FullyFaithful :=
(reflectorAdjunction i).fullyFaithfulROfIsIsoCounit
-- TODO: This holds more generally for idempotent adjunctions, not just reflective adjunctions.
/-- For a reflective functor `i` (with left adjoint `L`), with unit `η`, we have `η_iL = iL η`.
-/
theorem unit_obj_eq_map_unit [Reflective i] (X : C) :
(reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app (i.obj ((reflector i).obj X)) =
i.map ((reflector i).map ((reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app X)) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (i.map ((reflectorAdjunction i).counit.app ((reflector i).obj X))),
← i.map_comp]
simp
/--
When restricted to objects in `D` given by `i : D ⥤ C`, the unit is an isomorphism. In other words,
`η_iX` is an isomorphism for any `X` in `D`.
More generally this applies to objects essentially in the reflective subcategory, see
`Functor.essImage.unit_isIso`.
-/
example [Reflective i] {B : D} : IsIso ((reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app (i.obj B)) :=
inferInstance
variable {i}
/-- If `A` is essentially in the image of a reflective functor `i`, then `η_A` is an isomorphism.
This gives that the "witness" for `A` being in the essential image can instead be given as the
reflection of `A`, with the isomorphism as `η_A`.
(For any `B` in the reflective subcategory, we automatically have that `ε_B` is an iso.)
-/
theorem Functor.essImage.unit_isIso [Reflective i] {A : C} (h : i.essImage A) :
IsIso ((reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app A) := by
rwa [isIso_unit_app_iff_mem_essImage]
/-- If `η_A` is a split monomorphism, then `A` is in the reflective subcategory. -/
theorem mem_essImage_of_unit_isSplitMono [Reflective i] {A : C}
[IsSplitMono ((reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app A)] : i.essImage A := by
let η : 𝟭 C ⟶ reflector i ⋙ i := (reflectorAdjunction i).unit
haveI : IsIso (η.app (i.obj ((reflector i).obj A))) :=
Functor.essImage.unit_isIso ((i.obj_mem_essImage _))
have : Epi (η.app A) := by
refine @epi_of_epi _ _ _ _ _ (retraction (η.app A)) (η.app A) ?_
rw [show retraction _ ≫ η.app A = _ from η.naturality (retraction (η.app A))]
apply epi_comp (η.app (i.obj ((reflector i).obj A)))
haveI := isIso_of_epi_of_isSplitMono (η.app A)
exact (reflectorAdjunction i).mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso A
/-- Composition of reflective functors. -/
instance Reflective.comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [Reflective F] [Reflective G] :
Reflective (F ⋙ G) where
L := reflector G ⋙ reflector F
adj := (reflectorAdjunction G).comp (reflectorAdjunction F)
/-- (Implementation) Auxiliary definition for `unitCompPartialBijective`. -/
def unitCompPartialBijectiveAux [Reflective i] (A : C) (B : D) :
(A ⟶ i.obj B) ≃ (i.obj ((reflector i).obj A) ⟶ i.obj B) :=
((reflectorAdjunction i).homEquiv _ _).symm.trans
(Functor.FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful i).homEquiv
/-- The description of the inverse of the bijection `unitCompPartialBijectiveAux`. -/
theorem unitCompPartialBijectiveAux_symm_apply [Reflective i] {A : C} {B : D}
(f : i.obj ((reflector i).obj A) ⟶ i.obj B) :
(unitCompPartialBijectiveAux _ _).symm f = (reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app A ≫ f := by
simp [unitCompPartialBijectiveAux, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit]
/-- If `i` has a reflector `L`, then the function `(i.obj (L.obj A) ⟶ B) → (A ⟶ B)` given by
precomposing with `η.app A` is a bijection provided `B` is in the essential image of `i`.
That is, the function `fun (f : i.obj (L.obj A) ⟶ B) ↦ η.app A ≫ f` is bijective,
as long as `B` is in the essential image of `i`.
This definition gives an equivalence: the key property that the inverse can be described
nicely is shown in `unitCompPartialBijective_symm_apply`.
This establishes there is a natural bijection `(A ⟶ B) ≃ (i.obj (L.obj A) ⟶ B)`. In other words,
from the point of view of objects in `D`, `A` and `i.obj (L.obj A)` look the same: specifically
that `η.app A` is an isomorphism.
-/
def unitCompPartialBijective [Reflective i] (A : C) {B : C} (hB : i.essImage B) :
(A ⟶ B) ≃ (i.obj ((reflector i).obj A) ⟶ B) :=
calc
(A ⟶ B) ≃ (A ⟶ i.obj (Functor.essImage.witness hB)) := Iso.homCongr (Iso.refl _) hB.getIso.symm
_ ≃ (i.obj _ ⟶ i.obj (Functor.essImage.witness hB)) := unitCompPartialBijectiveAux _ _
_ ≃ (i.obj ((reflector i).obj A) ⟶ B) :=
Iso.homCongr (Iso.refl _) (Functor.essImage.getIso hB)
@[simp]
theorem unitCompPartialBijective_symm_apply [Reflective i] (A : C) {B : C} (hB : i.essImage B)
(f) : (unitCompPartialBijective A hB).symm f = (reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app A ≫ f := by
simp [unitCompPartialBijective, unitCompPartialBijectiveAux_symm_apply]
theorem unitCompPartialBijective_symm_natural [Reflective i] (A : C) {B B' : C} (h : B ⟶ B')
(hB : i.essImage B) (hB' : i.essImage B') (f : i.obj ((reflector i).obj A) ⟶ B) :
(unitCompPartialBijective A hB').symm (f ≫ h) = (unitCompPartialBijective A hB).symm f ≫ h := by
simp
theorem unitCompPartialBijective_natural [Reflective i] (A : C) {B B' : C} (h : B ⟶ B')
(hB : i.essImage B) (hB' : i.essImage B') (f : A ⟶ B) :
(unitCompPartialBijective A hB') (f ≫ h) = unitCompPartialBijective A hB f ≫ h := by
rw [← Equiv.eq_symm_apply, unitCompPartialBijective_symm_natural A h, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
instance [Reflective i] (X : Functor.EssImageSubcategory i) :
| IsIso (NatTrans.app (reflectorAdjunction i).unit X.obj) :=
Functor.essImage.unit_isIso X.property
-- These attributes are necessary to make automation work in `equivEssImageOfReflective`.
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Reflective.lean | 153 | 156 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
| ⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 180 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Grothendieck topologies
Definition and lemmas about Grothendieck topologies.
A Grothendieck topology for a category `C` is a set of sieves on each object `X` satisfying
certain closure conditions.
Alternate versions of the axioms (in arrow form) are also described.
Two explicit examples of Grothendieck topologies are given:
* The dense topology
* The atomic topology
as well as the complete lattice structure on Grothendieck topologies (which gives two additional
explicit topologies: the discrete and trivial topologies.)
A pretopology, or a basis for a topology is defined in
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Pretopology.lean`. The topology associated
to a topological space is defined in `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Spaces.lean`.
## Tags
Grothendieck topology, coverage, pretopology, site
## References
* [nLab, *Grothendieck topology*](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+topology)
* [S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, *Sheaves in Geometry and Logic*][MM92]
## Implementation notes
We use the definition of [nlab] and [MM92][] (Chapter III, Section 2), where Grothendieck topologies
are saturated collections of morphisms, rather than the notions of the Stacks project (00VG) and
the Elephant, in which topologies are allowed to be unsaturated, and are then completed.
TODO (BM): Add the definition from Stacks, as a pretopology, and complete to a topology.
This is so that we can produce a bijective correspondence between Grothendieck topologies on a
small category and Lawvere-Tierney topologies on its presheaf topos, as well as the equivalence
between Grothendieck topoi and left exact reflective subcategories of presheaf toposes.
-/
universe v₁ u₁ v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The definition of a Grothendieck topology: a set of sieves `J X` on each object `X` satisfying
three axioms:
1. For every object `X`, the maximal sieve is in `J X`.
2. If `S ∈ J X` then its pullback along any `h : Y ⟶ X` is in `J Y`.
3. If `S ∈ J X` and `R` is a sieve on `X`, then provided that the pullback of `R` along any arrow
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S` is in `J Y`, we have that `R` itself is in `J X`.
A sieve `S` on `X` is referred to as `J`-covering, (or just covering), if `S ∈ J X`.
See also [nlab] or [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1. -/
@[stacks 00Z4]
structure GrothendieckTopology where
/-- A Grothendieck topology on `C` consists of a set of sieves for each object `X`,
which satisfy some axioms. -/
sieves : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)
/-- The sieves associated to each object must contain the top sieve.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.top_mem`. -/
top_mem' : ∀ X, ⊤ ∈ sieves X
/-- Stability under pullback. Use `GrothendieckTopology.pullback_stable`. -/
pullback_stable' : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S ∈ sieves X → S.pullback f ∈ sieves Y
/-- Transitivity of sieves in a Grothendieck topology.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.transitive`. -/
transitive' :
∀ ⦃X⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (_ : S ∈ sieves X) (R : Sieve X),
(∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → R.pullback f ∈ sieves Y) → R ∈ sieves X
namespace GrothendieckTopology
instance : DFunLike (GrothendieckTopology C) C (fun X ↦ Set (Sieve X)) where
coe J X := sieves J X
coe_injective' J₁ J₂ h := by cases J₁; cases J₂; congr
variable {C}
variable {X Y : C} {S R : Sieve X}
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
/-- An extensionality lemma in terms of the coercion to a pi-type.
We prove this explicitly rather than deriving it so that it is in terms of the coercion rather than
the projection `.sieves`.
-/
@[ext]
theorem ext {J₁ J₂ : GrothendieckTopology C} (h : (J₁ : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)) = J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
@[simp]
theorem mem_sieves_iff_coe : S ∈ J.sieves X ↔ S ∈ J X :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Also known as the maximality axiom. -/
@[simp]
theorem top_mem (X : C) : ⊤ ∈ J X :=
J.top_mem' X
/-- Also known as the stability axiom. -/
@[simp]
theorem pullback_stable (f : Y ⟶ X) (hS : S ∈ J X) : S.pullback f ∈ J Y :=
J.pullback_stable' f hS
variable {J} in
@[simp]
lemma pullback_mem_iff_of_isIso {i : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso i] {S : Sieve Y} :
S.pullback i ∈ J _ ↔ S ∈ J _ := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, J.pullback_stable i⟩
convert J.pullback_stable (inv i) H
rw [← Sieve.pullback_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Sieve.pullback_id]
theorem transitive (hS : S ∈ J X) (R : Sieve X) (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → R.pullback f ∈ J Y) :
R ∈ J X :=
J.transitive' hS R h
theorem covering_of_eq_top : S = ⊤ → S ∈ J X := fun h => h.symm ▸ J.top_mem X
/-- If `S` is a subset of `R`, and `S` is covering, then `R` is covering as well.
See also discussion after [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1. -/
@[stacks 00Z5 "(2)"]
theorem superset_covering (Hss : S ≤ R) (sjx : S ∈ J X) : R ∈ J X := by
apply J.transitive sjx R fun Y f hf => _
intros Y f hf
apply covering_of_eq_top
rw [← top_le_iff, ← S.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hf]
apply Sieve.pullback_monotone _ Hss
/-- The intersection of two covering sieves is covering.
See also [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1 (iv). -/
@[stacks 00Z5 "(1)"]
theorem intersection_covering (rj : R ∈ J X) (sj : S ∈ J X) : R ⊓ S ∈ J X := by
apply J.transitive rj _ fun Y f Hf => _
intros Y f hf
rw [Sieve.pullback_inter, R.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hf]
simp [sj]
@[simp]
theorem intersection_covering_iff : R ⊓ S ∈ J X ↔ R ∈ J X ∧ S ∈ J X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨J.superset_covering inf_le_left h, J.superset_covering inf_le_right h⟩, fun t =>
intersection_covering _ t.1 t.2⟩
theorem bind_covering {S : Sieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y} (hS : S ∈ J X)
(hR : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (H : S f), R H ∈ J Y) : Sieve.bind S R ∈ J X :=
J.transitive hS _ fun _ f hf => superset_covering J (Sieve.le_pullback_bind S R f hf) (hR hf)
/-- The sieve `S` on `X` `J`-covers an arrow `f` to `X` if `S.pullback f ∈ J Y`.
This definition is an alternate way of presenting a Grothendieck topology.
-/
def Covers (S : Sieve X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : Prop :=
S.pullback f ∈ J Y
theorem covers_iff (S : Sieve X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : J.Covers S f ↔ S.pullback f ∈ J Y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem covering_iff_covers_id (S : Sieve X) : S ∈ J X ↔ J.Covers S (𝟙 X) := by simp [covers_iff]
/-- The maximality axiom in 'arrow' form: Any arrow `f` in `S` is covered by `S`. -/
theorem arrow_max (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) (hf : S f) : J.Covers S f := by
rw [Covers, (Sieve.mem_iff_pullback_eq_top f).1 hf]
apply J.top_mem
/-- The stability axiom in 'arrow' form: If `S` covers `f` then `S` covers `g ≫ f` for any `g`. -/
theorem arrow_stable (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) (h : J.Covers S f) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
J.Covers S (g ≫ f) := by
rw [covers_iff] at h ⊢
simp [h, Sieve.pullback_comp]
/-- The transitivity axiom in 'arrow' form: If `S` covers `f` and every arrow in `S` is covered by
`R`, then `R` covers `f`.
| -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Grothendieck.lean | 187 | 187 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Gabriel Ebner, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Conditionally complete linear order structure on `ℕ`
In this file we
* define a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` structure on `ℕ`;
* prove a few lemmas about `iSup`/`iInf`/`Set.iUnion`/`Set.iInter` and natural numbers.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true, eq_self_iff_true, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
/-- This combines `Nat.iInf_of_empty` with `ciInf_const`. -/
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ _ : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by
classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h
| theorem not_mem_of_lt_sInf {s : Set ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m < sInf s) : m ∉ s := by
classical
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 75 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
| lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 58 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Egorov theorem
This file contains the Egorov theorem which states that an almost everywhere convergent
sequence on a finite measure space converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
This theorem is useful for the Vitali convergence theorem as well as theorems regarding
convergence in measure.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto`: Egorov's theorem which shows that a sequence of
almost everywhere convergent functions converges uniformly except on an arbitrarily small set.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MetricSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
namespace Egorov
/-- Given a sequence of functions `f` and a function `g`, `notConvergentSeq f g n j` is the
set of elements such that `f k x` and `g x` are separated by at least `1 / (n + 1)` for some
`k ≥ j`.
This definition is useful for Egorov's theorem. -/
def notConvergentSeq [Preorder ι] (f : ι → α → β) (g : α → β) (n : ℕ) (j : ι) : Set α :=
⋃ (k) (_ : j ≤ k), { x | 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) }
variable {n : ℕ} {j : ι} {s : Set α} {ε : ℝ} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem mem_notConvergentSeq_iff [Preorder ι] {x : α} :
x ∈ notConvergentSeq f g n j ↔ ∃ k ≥ j, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) := by
simp_rw [notConvergentSeq, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_setOf]
| theorem notConvergentSeq_antitone [Preorder ι] : Antitone (notConvergentSeq f g n) :=
fun _ _ hjk => Set.iUnion₂_mono' fun l hl => ⟨l, le_trans hjk hl, Set.Subset.rfl⟩
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Egorov.lean | 50 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
| rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 351 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
/-!
# Normed groups homomorphisms
This file gathers definitions and elementary constructions about bounded group homomorphisms
between normed (abelian) groups (abbreviated to "normed group homs").
The main lemmas relate the boundedness condition to continuity and Lipschitzness.
The main construction is to endow the type of normed group homs between two given normed groups
with a group structure and a norm, giving rise to a normed group structure. We provide several
simple constructions for normed group homs, like kernel, range and equalizer.
Some easy other constructions are related to subgroups of normed groups.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory of `SeminormedAddGroupHom` and we specialize to `NormedAddGroupHom` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal
-- TODO: migrate to the new morphism / morphism_class style
/-- A morphism of seminormed abelian groups is a bounded group homomorphism. -/
structure NormedAddGroupHom (V W : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] where
/-- The function underlying a `NormedAddGroupHom` -/
toFun : V → W
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is additive. -/
map_add' : ∀ v₁ v₂, toFun (v₁ + v₂) = toFun v₁ + toFun v₂
/-- A `NormedAddGroupHom` is bounded. -/
bound' : ∃ C, ∀ v, ‖toFun v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup W]
{f g : NormedAddGroupHom V W}
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom'` for a version that uses `ℝ≥0` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀ v, ‖f v‖ ≤ C * ‖v‖) : NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, h⟩ }
/-- Associate to a group homomorphism a bounded group homomorphism under a norm control condition.
See `AddMonoidHom.mkNormedAddGroupHom` for a version that uses `ℝ` for the bound. -/
def mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V →+ W) (C : ℝ≥0) (hC : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) :
NormedAddGroupHom V W :=
{ f with bound' := ⟨C, hC⟩ }
end AddMonoidHom
theorem exists_pos_bound_of_bound {V W : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup W] {f : V → W} (M : ℝ) (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) :
∃ N, 0 < N ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖ :=
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), fun x =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖ := h x
_ ≤ max M 1 * ‖x‖ := by gcongr; apply le_max_left
⟩
namespace NormedAddGroupHom
variable {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [SeminormedAddCommGroup V₃]
variable {f g : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂}
/-- A Lipschitz continuous additive homomorphism is a normed additive group homomorphism. -/
def ofLipschitz (f : V₁ →+ V₂) {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂ :=
f.mkNormedAddGroupHom K fun x ↦ by simpa only [map_zero, dist_zero_right] using h.dist_le_mul x 0
instance funLike : FunLike (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance toAddMonoidHomClass : AddMonoidHomClass (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) V₁ V₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := (AddMonoidHom.mk' f.toFun f.map_add').map_zero
initialize_simps_projections NormedAddGroupHom (toFun → apply)
theorem coe_inj (H : (f : V₁ → V₂) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (V₁ → V₂) toFun := by
apply coe_inj
theorem coe_inj_iff : f = g ↔ (f : V₁ → V₂) = g :=
⟨congr_arg _, coe_inj⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_inj <| funext H
variable (f g)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_mk (f) (h₁) (h₂) (h₃) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom C hC) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkNormedAddGroupHom' (f : V₁ →+ V₂) (C) (hC) : ⇑(f.mkNormedAddGroupHom' C hC) = f :=
rfl
/-- The group homomorphism underlying a bounded group homomorphism. -/
def toAddMonoidHom (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) : V₁ →+ V₂ :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' f f.map_add'
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddMonoidHom : ⇑f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective :
Function.Injective (@NormedAddGroupHom.toAddMonoidHom V₁ V₂ _ _) := fun f g h =>
coe_inj <| by rw [← coe_toAddMonoidHom f, ← coe_toAddMonoidHom g, h]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toAddMonoidHom (f) (h₁) (h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂).toAddMonoidHom = AddMonoidHom.mk' f h₁ :=
rfl
theorem bound : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := f.bound'
exists_pos_bound_of_bound _ hC
theorem antilipschitz_of_norm_ge {K : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, map_sub] using h (x - y)
/-- A normed group hom is surjective on the subgroup `K` with constant `C` if every element
`x` of `K` has a preimage whose norm is bounded above by `C*‖x‖`. This is a more
abstract version of `f` having a right inverse defined on `K` with operator norm
at most `C`. -/
def SurjectiveOnWith (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) (K : AddSubgroup V₂) (C : ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ h ∈ K, ∃ g, f g = h ∧ ‖g‖ ≤ C * ‖h‖
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.mono {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C C' : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) (H : C ≤ C') : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
intro k k_in
rcases h k k_in with ⟨g, rfl, hg⟩
use g, rfl
by_cases Hg : ‖f g‖ = 0
· simpa [Hg] using hg
· exact hg.trans (by gcongr)
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.exists_pos {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : ∃ C' > 0, f.SurjectiveOnWith K C' := by
refine ⟨|C| + 1, ?_, ?_⟩
· linarith [abs_nonneg C]
· apply h.mono
linarith [le_abs_self C]
theorem SurjectiveOnWith.surjOn {f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂} {K : AddSubgroup V₂} {C : ℝ}
(h : f.SurjectiveOnWith K C) : Set.SurjOn f Set.univ K := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).imp fun _a ⟨ha, _⟩ => ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ha⟩
/-! ### The operator norm -/
/-- The operator norm of a seminormed group homomorphism is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ }
|
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (NormedAddGroupHom V₁ V₂) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
rfl
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Hom.lean | 181 | 188 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Derivative and series expansion of real logarithm
In this file we prove that `Real.log` is infinitely smooth at all nonzero `x : ℝ`. We also prove
that the series `∑' n : ℕ, x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)` converges to `(-Real.log (1 - x))` for all
`x : ℝ`, `|x| < 1`.
## Tags
logarithm, derivative
-/
open Filter Finset Set
open scoped Topology ContDiff
namespace Real
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
| have : HasStrictDerivAt log (exp <| log x)⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_exp <| log x).of_local_left_inverse (continuousAt_log hx.ne')
(ne_of_gt <| exp_pos _) <|
Eventually.mono (lt_mem_nhds hx) @exp_log
rwa [exp_log hx] at this
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Deriv.lean | 34 | 39 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖₊ = n := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖ = ofNat(n) :=
norm_natCast n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖₊ = ofNat(n) :=
nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖₊ = 2 := nnnorm_ofNat 2
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖ = q := by
rw [← ofReal_nnratCast]; exact norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm]
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using norm_smul (n : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
‖n • x‖₊ = n • ‖x‖₊ := by simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using nnnorm_smul (n : K) x
section NormedField
variable [NormedField E] [CharZero E] [NormedSpace K E]
include K
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖ = q • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using norm_smul (q : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖₊ = q • ‖x‖₊ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using nnnorm_smul (q : K) x
@[bound]
lemma norm_expect_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → E} : ‖𝔼 i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ 𝔼 i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
Finset.le_expect_of_subadditive norm_zero norm_add_le fun _ _ ↦ by rw [norm_nnqsmul K]
end NormedField
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
theorem abs_im_le_norm (z : K) : |im z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply im_sq_le_normSq
theorem norm_re_le_norm (z : K) : ‖re z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_re_le_norm z
theorem norm_im_le_norm (z : K) : ‖im z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_im_le_norm z
theorem re_le_norm (z : K) : re z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_re_le_norm z)).2
theorem im_le_norm (z : K) : im z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_le_norm _)).2
theorem im_eq_zero_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : im a = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_self_norm a, normSq_apply, left_eq_add, mul_self_eq_zero]
using congr_arg (fun z => z * z) ((re_le_norm a).antisymm h)
theorem re_eq_self_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : (re a : K) = a := by
rw [← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, im_eq_zero_of_le h]
open IsAbsoluteValue
theorem abs_re_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |re z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_re_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem abs_im_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |im z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_im_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem norm_I_of_ne_zero (hI : (I : K) ≠ 0) : ‖(I : K)‖ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg I) zero_le_one, one_mul, ← norm_mul,
I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI, norm_neg, norm_one]
theorem re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (x : K) : re (x * conj x) = ‖x * conj x‖ := by
rw [mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow]; simp [-map_pow]
theorem norm_sq_re_add_conj (x : K) : ‖x + conj x‖ ^ 2 = re (x + conj x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_conj, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_mul, norm_ofReal, sq_abs, ofReal_re]
theorem norm_sq_re_conj_add (x : K) : ‖conj x + x‖ ^ 2 = re (conj x + x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_comm, norm_sq_re_add_conj]
/-! ### Cauchy sequences -/
theorem isCauSeq_re (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => re (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_re_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
theorem isCauSeq_im (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => im (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_im_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
/-- The real part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqRe (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_re f⟩
/-- The imaginary part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqIm (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_im f⟩
theorem isCauSeq_norm {f : ℕ → K} (hf : IsCauSeq norm f) : IsCauSeq abs (norm ∘ f) := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf ε ε0
⟨i, fun j hj => lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (hi j hj)⟩
end RCLike
section Instances
noncomputable instance Real.instRCLike : RCLike ℝ where
re := AddMonoidHom.id ℝ
im := 0
I := 0
I_re_ax := by simp only [AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
I_mul_I_ax := Or.intro_left _ rfl
re_add_im_ax z := by
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, RingHom.id_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
ofReal_re_ax _ := rfl
ofReal_im_ax _ := rfl
mul_re_ax z w := by simp only [sub_zero, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_ax z w := by simp only [add_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_re_ax z := by simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_id_of_comm]
conj_im_ax _ := by simp only [neg_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_I_ax := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, neg_zero]
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := by simp only [sq, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_mul_self z, add_zero,
mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_I_ax _ := by simp only [mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
le_iff_re_im := (and_iff_left rfl).symm
end Instances
namespace RCLike
section Order
open scoped ComplexOrder
variable {z w : K}
theorem lt_iff_re_im : z < w ↔ re z < re w ∧ im z = im w := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, @RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, heq⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, mt (fun hreq => ext hreq hi) heq⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hrn⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, ne_of_apply_ne _ hrn⟩
theorem nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using le_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem pos_iff : 0 < z ↔ 0 < re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using lt_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem nonpos_iff : z ≤ 0 ↔ re z ≤ 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using le_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
theorem neg_iff : z < 0 ↔ re z < 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using lt_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
lemma nonneg_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 ≤ z ↔ ∃ x ≥ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonneg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma pos_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 < z ↔ ∃ x > (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [pos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma nonpos_iff_exists_ofReal : z ≤ 0 ↔ ∃ x ≤ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonpos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma neg_iff_exists_ofReal : z < 0 ↔ ∃ x < (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [neg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal {x y : ℝ} : (x : K) ≤ (y : K) ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_re_im]
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal {x y : ℝ} : (x : K) < (y : K) ↔ x < y := by
rw [lt_iff_re_im]
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ (x : K) ↔ 0 ≤ x := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_le_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nonpos {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_le_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < (x : K) ↔ 0 < x := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_lt_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) < 0 ↔ x < 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_lt_ofReal]
protected lemma inv_pos_of_pos (hz : 0 < z) : 0 < z⁻¹ := by
rw [pos_iff_exists_ofReal] at hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := hz
rw [← hx', ← ofReal_inv, ofReal_pos]
exact inv_pos_of_pos hx
protected lemma inv_pos : 0 < z⁻¹ ↔ 0 < z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => RCLike.inv_pos_of_pos h⟩
rw [← inv_inv z]
exact RCLike.inv_pos_of_pos h
/-- With `z ≤ w` iff `w - z` is real and nonnegative, `ℝ` and `ℂ` are star ordered rings.
(That is, a star ring in which the nonnegative elements are those of the form `star z * z`.)
Note this is only an instance with `open scoped ComplexOrder`. -/
lemma toStarOrderedRing : StarOrderedRing K :=
StarOrderedRing.of_nonneg_iff'
(h_add := fun {x y} hxy z => by
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im] at *
simpa [map_add, add_le_add_iff_left, add_right_inj] using hxy)
(h_nonneg_iff := fun x => by
rw [nonneg_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨√(re x), by simp [ext_iff (K := K), h.1, h.2]⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
simp [mul_comm, mul_self_nonneg, add_nonneg])
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toStarOrderedRing
lemma toZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass K where
zero_le_one := by simp [@RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toZeroLEOneClass
lemma toIsOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid K where
add_le_add_left _ _ := add_le_add_left
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toIsOrderedAddMonoid
/-- With `z ≤ w` iff `w - z` is real and nonnegative, `ℝ` and `ℂ` are strictly ordered rings.
Note this is only an instance with `open scoped ComplexOrder`. -/
lemma toIsStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing K :=
.of_mul_pos fun z w hz hw ↦ by
rw [lt_iff_re_im, map_zero] at hz hw ⊢
simp [mul_re, mul_im, ← hz.2, ← hw.2, mul_pos hz.1 hw.1]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toIsStrictOrderedRing
theorem toOrderedSMul : OrderedSMul ℝ K :=
OrderedSMul.mk' fun a b r hab hr => by
replace hab := hab.le
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im] at hab
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im, smul_re, smul_re, smul_im, smul_im]
exact hab.imp (fun h => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h hr.le) (congr_arg _)
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toOrderedSMul
| /-- A star algebra over `K` has a scalar multiplication that respects the order. -/
lemma _root_.StarModule.instOrderedSMul {A : Type*} [NonUnitalRing A] [StarRing A] [PartialOrder A]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 868 | 869 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Pseudo.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Products of pseudometric spaces and other constructions
This file constructs the supremum distance on binary products of pseudometric spaces and provides
instances for type synonyms.
-/
open Bornology Filter Metric Set Topology
open scoped NNReal
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- Pseudometric space structure pulled back by a function. -/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoMetricSpace β) :
PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist x y := dist (f x) (f y)
dist_self _ := dist_self _
dist_comm _ _ := dist_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := dist_triangle _ _ _
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_dist _ _ := edist_dist _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := (uniformity_basis_dist.comap _).eq_biInf
toBornology := Bornology.induced f
cobounded_sets := Set.ext fun s => mem_comap_iff_compl.trans <| by
simp only [← isBounded_def, isBounded_iff, forall_mem_image, mem_setOf]
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by an inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `TopologicalSpace`
structure. -/
def Topology.IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
[m : PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceTopology (.induced f m) hf.eq_induced
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace := IsInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace
/-- Pull back a pseudometric space structure by a uniform inducing map. This is a version of
`PseudoMetricSpace.induced` useful in case if the domain already has a `UniformSpace`
structure. -/
def IsUniformInducing.comapPseudoMetricSpace {α β} [UniformSpace α] [m : PseudoMetricSpace β]
(f : α → β) (h : IsUniformInducing f) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
.replaceUniformity (.induced f m) h.comap_uniformity.symm
instance Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace {p : α → Prop} : PseudoMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
lemma Subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : dist x y = dist (x : α) y := rfl
lemma Subtype.nndist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : nndist x y = nndist (x : α) y := rfl
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
PseudoMetricSpace.induced MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : dist (unop x) (unop y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_op (x y : α) : dist (op x) (op y) = dist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_unop (x y : αᵐᵒᵖ) : nndist (unop x) (unop y) = nndist x y := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma nndist_op (x y : α) : nndist (op x) (op y) = nndist x y := rfl
end MulOpposite
section NNReal
instance : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ≥0 := Subtype.pseudoMetricSpace
lemma NNReal.dist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : dist a b = |(a : ℝ) - b| := rfl
lemma NNReal.nndist_eq (a b : ℝ≥0) : nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ => by
simp only [max_le_iff, tsub_le_iff_right (α := ℝ≥0)]
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nndist, dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff,
tsub_le_iff_right, NNReal.coe_add]
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist 0 z = z := by
simp only [NNReal.nndist_eq, max_eq_right, tsub_zero, zero_tsub, zero_le']
@[simp]
lemma NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val' (z : ℝ≥0) : nndist z 0 = z := by
rw [nndist_comm]
exact NNReal.nndist_zero_eq_val z
lemma NNReal.le_add_nndist (a b : ℝ≥0) : a ≤ b + nndist a b := by
suffices (a : ℝ) ≤ (b : ℝ) + dist a b by
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_nndist]
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact le_of_abs_le (dist_eq a b).ge
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Ico 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico (c : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Ico 0 c.toNNReal := by
by_cases c_pos : 0 < c
· convert NNReal.ball_zero_eq_Ico' ⟨c, c_pos.le⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_pos.le]
simp [not_lt.mp c_pos]
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' (c : ℝ≥0) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c.toReal = Set.Icc 0 c := by ext x; simp
lemma NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc {c : ℝ} (c_nn : 0 ≤ c) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ≥0) c = Set.Icc 0 c.toNNReal := by
convert NNReal.closedBall_zero_eq_Icc' ⟨c, c_nn⟩
simp [Real.toNNReal, c_nn]
end NNReal
namespace ULift
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (ULift β) := PseudoMetricSpace.induced ULift.down ‹_›
lemma dist_eq (x y : ULift β) : dist x y = dist x.down y.down := rfl
lemma nndist_eq (x y : ULift β) : nndist x y = nndist x.down y.down := rfl
@[simp] lemma dist_up_up (x y : β) : dist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = dist x y := rfl
@[simp] lemma nndist_up_up (x y : β) : nndist (ULift.up x) (ULift.up y) = nndist x y := rfl
end ULift
section Prod
variable [PseudoMetricSpace β]
instance Prod.pseudoMetricSpaceMax : PseudoMetricSpace (α × β) :=
let i := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist
(fun x y : α × β => dist x.1 y.1 ⊔ dist x.2 y.2)
(fun _ _ => (max_lt (edist_lt_top _ _) (edist_lt_top _ _)).ne) fun x y => by
simp only [dist_edist, ← ENNReal.toReal_max (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
Prod.edist_eq]
i.replaceBornology fun s => by
simp only [← isBounded_image_fst_and_snd, isBounded_iff_eventually, forall_mem_image, ←
eventually_and, ← forall_and, ← max_le_iff]
rfl
lemma Prod.dist_eq {x y : α × β} : dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_left {x : α} {y₁ y₂ : β} : dist (x, y₁) (x, y₂) = dist y₁ y₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
lemma dist_prod_same_right {x₁ x₂ : α} {y : β} : dist (x₁, y) (x₂, y) = dist x₁ x₂ := by
simp [Prod.dist_eq, dist_nonneg]
lemma ball_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) : ball x r ×ˢ ball y r = ball (x, y) r :=
ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma closedBall_prod_same (x : α) (y : β) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r ×ˢ closedBall y r = closedBall (x, y) r := ext fun z => by simp [Prod.dist_eq]
lemma sphere_prod (x : α × β) (r : ℝ) :
sphere x r = sphere x.1 r ×ˢ closedBall x.2 r ∪ closedBall x.1 r ×ˢ sphere x.2 r := by
obtain hr | rfl | hr := lt_trichotomy r 0
· simp [hr]
· cases x
simp_rw [← closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos le_rfl, union_self, closedBall_prod_same]
· ext ⟨x', y'⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_prod, Metric.mem_closedBall, Metric.mem_sphere, Prod.dist_eq,
max_eq_iff]
refine or_congr (and_congr_right ?_) (and_comm.trans (and_congr_left ?_))
all_goals rintro rfl; rfl
end Prod
lemma uniformContinuous_dist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2 :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a b} h =>
calc dist (dist a.1 a.2) (dist b.1 b.2) ≤ dist a.1 b.1 + dist a.2 b.2 :=
dist_dist_dist_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ dist a b + dist a b := add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)
_ < ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_lt_add h h
_ = ε := add_halves ε⟩
protected lemma UniformContinuous.dist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_dist.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_dist : Continuous fun p : α × α ↦ dist p.1 p.2 := uniformContinuous_dist.continuous
@[continuity, fun_prop]
protected lemma Continuous.dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => dist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_dist.comp₂ hf hg
protected lemma Filter.Tendsto.dist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (dist a b)) :=
(continuous_dist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_dist [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous fun x : β × β => dist (f x.1) (f x.2) :=
⟨fun h => h.fst'.dist h.snd', fun h =>
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
(h.comp (.prodMk_left _)).tendsto' _ _ <| dist_self _⟩
lemma uniformContinuous_nndist : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_dist.subtype_mk _
protected lemma UniformContinuous.nndist [UniformSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
lemma continuous_nndist : Continuous fun p : α × α => nndist p.1 p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_nndist.continuous
@[fun_prop]
protected lemma Continuous.nndist [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => nndist (f b) (g b) :=
continuous_nndist.comp₂ hf hg
protected lemma Filter.Tendsto.nndist {f g : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
Tendsto (fun x => nndist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (nndist a b)) :=
(continuous_nndist.tendsto (a, b)).comp (hf.prodMk_nhds hg)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Constructions.lean | 377 | 378 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : g • a ≤ a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (pow_smul_le h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm h key
end FiniteGroup
section PowIsSubgroup
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative monoid is a submonoid -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative add monoid is a submonoid"]
def submonoidOfIdempotent {M : Type*} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [Finite M] (S : Set M)
(hS1 : S.Nonempty) (hS2 : S * S = S) : Submonoid M :=
have pow_mem (a : M) (ha : a ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) ∈ S := by
induction n with
| zero => rwa [zero_add, pow_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [← hS2, pow_succ]
exact Set.mul_mem_mul ih ha
{ carrier := S
one_mem' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS1
rw [← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt (orderOf_pos a))]
exact pow_mem a ha (orderOf a - 1)
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => (congr_arg₂ (· ∈ ·) rfl hS2).mp (Set.mul_mem_mul ha hb) }
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite group is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite add group is a subgroup"]
def subgroupOfIdempotent {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (S : Set G) (hS1 : S.Nonempty)
(hS2 : S * S = S) : Subgroup G :=
{ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 with
carrier := S
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show a⁻¹ ∈ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 by
rw [← one_mul a⁻¹, ← pow_one a, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← pow_sub a (orderOf_pos a)]
exact pow_mem ha (orderOf a - 1) }
/-- If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite group `G`, then `S ^ |G|` is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) smulCardAddSubgroup
"If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite add group `G`, then `|G| • S` is a subgroup"]
def powCardSubgroup {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (S : Set G) (hS : S.Nonempty) : Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ S ^ Fintype.card G := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS
rw [← pow_card_eq_one]
exact Set.pow_mem_pow ha
subgroupOfIdempotent (S ^ Fintype.card G) ⟨1, one_mem⟩ <| by
classical
apply (Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_mul_left _ one_mem) (ge_of_eq _)).symm
simp_rw [← pow_add,
Group.card_pow_eq_card_pow_card_univ S (Fintype.card G + Fintype.card G) le_add_self]
end PowIsSubgroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_one (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, ha⟩ := ha.exists_pow_eq_one
exact (pow_eq_one_iff_of_nonneg ha₀ hn.ne').1 ha
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a x : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_neg_one (ha₀ : a ≤ 0) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = -1 :=
(sq_eq_one_iff.1 <| ha.pow.eq_one <| sq_nonneg a).resolve_left <| by
rintro rfl; exact one_pos.not_le ha₀
theorem orderOf_abs_ne_one (h : |x| ≠ 1) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
intro n hn hx
replace hx : |x| ^ n = 1 := by simpa only [abs_one, abs_pow] using congr_arg abs hx
rcases h.lt_or_lt with h | h
· exact ((pow_lt_one₀ (abs_nonneg x) h hn.ne').ne hx).elim
· exact ((one_lt_pow₀ h hn.ne').ne' hx).elim
theorem LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two : orderOf x ≤ 2 := by
rcases ne_or_eq |x| 1 with h | h
· simp [orderOf_abs_ne_one h]
rcases eq_or_eq_neg_of_abs_eq h with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
exact orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one zero_lt_two (by simp)
end LinearOrderedRing
section Prod
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {x : α × β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Prod.orderOf (x : α × β) : orderOf x = (orderOf x.1).lcm (orderOf x.2) :=
minimalPeriod_prodMap _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.1 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_fst_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.2 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_snd_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.fst {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.1 :=
hx.mono orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.snd {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.2 :=
hx.mono orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive IsOfFinAddOrder.prod_mk]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.prod_mk : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder b → IsOfFinOrder (a, b) := by
simpa only [← orderOf_pos_iff, Prod.orderOf] using Nat.lcm_pos
@[to_additive]
lemma Prod.orderOf_mk : orderOf (a, b) = Nat.lcm (orderOf a) (orderOf b) :=
(a, b).orderOf
end Prod
-- TODO: Corresponding `pi` lemmas. We cannot currently state them here because of import cycles
@[simp]
lemma Nat.cast_card_eq_zero (R) [AddGroupWithOne R] [Fintype R] : (Fintype.card R : R) = 0 := by
rw [← nsmul_one, card_nsmul_eq_zero]
section NonAssocRing
variable (R : Type*) [NonAssocRing R] (p : ℕ)
lemma CharP.addOrderOf_one : CharP R (addOrderOf (1 : R)) where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_dvd_iff_nsmul_eq_zero]
variable [Fintype R]
variable {R} in
lemma charP_of_ne_zero (hn : card R = p) (hR : ∀ i < p, (i : R) = 0 → i = 0) : CharP R p where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by
have H : (p : R) = 0 := by rw [← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n p, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul, add_zero] at h
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
apply hR _ (Nat.mod_lt _ _) h
rw [← hn, gt_iff_lt, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
exact ⟨0⟩
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul]
end NonAssocRing
lemma charP_of_prime_pow_injective (R) [Ring R] [Fintype R] (p n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(hn : card R = p ^ n) (hR : ∀ i ≤ n, (p : R) ^ i = 0 → i = n) : CharP R (p ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := CharP.exists R
have hcpn : c ∣ p ^ n := by rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R c, ← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ : ∃ i ≤ n, c = p ^ i := by rwa [Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.1] at hcpn
obtain rfl : i = n := hR i hi <| by rw [← Nat.cast_pow, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
assumption
namespace SemiconjBy
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq [Group G] (a : G) {x y : G} (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : orderOf x = orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
intro n
exact (h.pow_right n).eq_one_iff
end SemiconjBy
section single
lemma orderOf_piMulSingle {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [(i : ι) → Monoid (M i)]
(i : ι) (g : M i) :
orderOf (Pi.mulSingle i g) = orderOf g :=
orderOf_injective (MonoidHom.mulSingle M i) (Pi.mulSingle_injective M i) g
end single
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 1,228 | 1,230 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Integral average of a function
In this file we define `MeasureTheory.average μ f` (notation: `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`) to be the average
value of `f` with respect to measure `μ`. It is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ)`, so it
is equal to zero if `f` is not integrable or if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability
measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, we use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ` (notation for `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`). For
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`.
Both have a version for the Lebesgue integral rather than Bochner.
We prove several version of the first moment method: An integrable function is below/above its
average on a set of positive measure:
* `measure_le_setLAverage_pos` for the Lebesgue integral
* `measure_le_setAverage_pos` for the Bochner integral
## Implementation notes
The average is defined as an integral over `(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ` so that all theorems about Bochner
integrals work for the average without modifications. For theorems that require integrability of a
function, we provide a convenience lemma `MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average`.
## Tags
integral, center mass, average value
-/
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
/-!
### Average value of a function w.r.t. a measure
The (Bochner, Lebesgue) average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` (notation:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ`, `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`) is defined as the (Bochner, Lebesgue) integral divided by the total
measure, so it is equal to zero if `μ` is an infinite measure, and (typically) equal to infinity if
`f` is not integrable. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if the space has infinite
measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If `s`
has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If
`s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem setLAverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq := setLAverage_eq
theorem setLAverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq' := setLAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
theorem setLAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr := setLAverage_congr
theorem setLAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr_fun hs h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr_fun := setLAverage_congr_fun
theorem laverage_lt_top (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∞ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq]
exact div_lt_top hf (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ)
theorem setLAverage_lt_top : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞ → ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∞ :=
laverage_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_lt_top := setLAverage_lt_top
theorem laverage_add_measure :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
μ univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ν univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ
simp [laverage_eq, hμ]
by_cases hν : IsFiniteMeasure ν; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hν
simp [laverage_eq, hν]
haveI := hμ; haveI := hν
simp only [← ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm, measure_mul_laverage, ← ENNReal.add_div,
← lintegral_add_measure, ← Measure.add_apply, ← laverage_eq]
theorem measure_mul_setLAverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ s * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
have := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_mul_laverage, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_mul_setLaverage := measure_mul_setLAverage
theorem laverage_union (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
μ s / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ + μ t / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, laverage_add_measure, restrict_apply_univ, restrict_apply_univ]
theorem laverage_union_mem_openSegment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), ENNReal.div_pos hs₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩,
ENNReal.div_pos ht₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_union_mem_segment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ≥0∞] ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hs₀ : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hs₀
rw [restrict_congr_set (hs₀.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), zero_le _, zero_le _, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
laverage_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _)
@[simp]
theorem laverage_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [laverage, lintegral_const, measure_univ, mul_one]
theorem setLAverage_const (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ,
univ_inter, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hs₀ hs, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_const := setLAverage_const
theorem laverage_one [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [NeZero μ] : ⨍⁻ _x, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
laverage_const _ _
theorem setLAverage_one (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
setLAverage_const hs₀ hs _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_one := setLAverage_one
@[simp]
theorem laverage_mul_measure_univ (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(⨍⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) * μ univ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem lintegral_laverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ _x, ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp
theorem setLIntegral_setLAverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ _x in s, ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_laverage _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLintegral_setLaverage := setLIntegral_setLAverage
end ENNReal
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable (μ)
variable {f g : α → E}
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def average (f : α → E) :=
∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average μ r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume.real univ)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable
or if the space has infinite measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal
to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => average volume f) => r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable on
`s` or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero `f` is not integrable on `s`
or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => average (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
@[simp]
theorem average_zero : ⨍ _, (0 : E) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [average, integral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem average_zero_measure (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
rw [average, smul_zero, integral_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem average_neg (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, -f x ∂μ = -⨍ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
theorem average_eq' (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ :=
rfl
theorem average_eq (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = (μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq', integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_inv, measureReal_def]
theorem average_eq_integral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_smul_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
μ.real univ • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, integral_zero_measure, average_zero_measure, smul_zero]
· rw [average_eq, smul_inv_smul₀]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_pos ?_ <| measure_ne_top _ _).ne'
rwa [Ne, measure_univ_eq_zero]
theorem setAverage_eq (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = (μ.real s)⁻¹ • ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem setAverage_eq' (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [average_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
variable {μ}
theorem average_congr {f g : α → E} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [average_eq, integral_congr_ae h]
theorem setAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setAverage_eq, setIntegral_congr_set h, measureReal_congr h]
theorem setAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in s, g x ∂μ := by simp only [average_eq, setIntegral_congr_ae hs h]
theorem average_add_measure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {f : α → E}
(hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
⨍ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
(μ.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ +
(ν.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂ν := by
simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, measure_smul_average, ← smul_add,
← integral_add_measure hμ hν, ← ENNReal.toReal_add (measure_ne_top μ _) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
rw [average_eq, measureReal_add_apply]
theorem average_pair [CompleteSpace E]
{f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hgi : Integrable g μ) :
⨍ x, (f x, g x) ∂μ = (⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g x ∂μ) :=
integral_pair hfi.to_average hgi.to_average
theorem measure_smul_setAverage (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ.real s • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_smul_average, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
| theorem average_union {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 369 | 370 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
/-!
# Support of a function in an order
This file relates the support of a function to order constructions.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {α M : Type*}
namespace Function
variable [One M]
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_sup [SemilatticeSup M] (f g : α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ f x ⊔ g x) ⊆ mulSupport f ∪ mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_binop_subset (· ⊔ ·) (sup_idem _) f g
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_inf [SemilatticeInf M] (f g : α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ f x ⊓ g x) ⊆ mulSupport f ∪ mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_binop_subset (· ⊓ ·) (inf_idem _) f g
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_max [LinearOrder M] (f g : α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ max (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mulSupport f ∪ mulSupport g := mulSupport_sup f g
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_min [LinearOrder M] (f g : α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ min (f x) (g x)) ⊆ mulSupport f ∪ mulSupport g := mulSupport_inf f g
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_iSup [ConditionallyCompleteLattice M] [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ⨆ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mulSupport (f i) := by
simp only [mulSupport_subset_iff', mem_iUnion, not_exists, nmem_mulSupport]
intro x hx
simp only [hx, ciSup_const]
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_iInf [ConditionallyCompleteLattice M] [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α → M) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ⨅ i, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i, mulSupport (f i) := mulSupport_iSup (M := Mᵒᵈ) f
end Function
namespace Set
section LE
variable [LE M] [One M] {s : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α} {y : M}
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_apply_le' (hfg : a ∈ s → f a ≤ y) (hg : a ∉ s → 1 ≤ y) :
mulIndicator s f a ≤ y := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· simpa [ha] using hfg ha
· simpa [ha] using hg ha
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_le' (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≤ g a) (hg : ∀ a, a ∉ s → 1 ≤ g a) :
mulIndicator s f ≤ g := fun _ ↦ mulIndicator_apply_le' (hfg _) (hg _)
| @[to_additive]
lemma le_mulIndicator_apply (hfg : a ∈ s → y ≤ g a) (hf : a ∉ s → y ≤ 1) :
y ≤ mulIndicator s g a := mulIndicator_apply_le' (M := Mᵒᵈ) hfg hf
@[to_additive]
lemma le_mulIndicator (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≤ g a) (hf : ∀ a ∉ s, f a ≤ 1) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Indicator.lean | 74 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Ziyu Wang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ziyu Wang, Chenyi Li, Sébastien Gouëzel, Penghao Yu, Zhipeng Cao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
/-!
# Gradient
## Main Definitions
Let `f` be a function from a Hilbert Space `F` to `𝕜` (`𝕜` is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) , `x` be a point in `F`
and `f'` be a vector in F. Then
`HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has a gradient `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasGradientAt f f' x := HasGradientWithinAt f f' x univ`
## Main results
This file contains the following parts of gradient.
* the definition of gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasFDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientWithinAt` and `HasFDerivWithinAt`, `HasGradientAt` and `HasFDerivAt`,
`Gradient` and `fderiv`.
* theorems the Uniqueness of Gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientAt` and `HasDerivAt`, `Gradient` and `deriv` when `F = 𝕜`.
* the theorems about the congruence of the gradient.
* the theorems about the gradient of constant function.
* the theorems about the continuity of a function admitting a gradient.
-/
open Topology InnerProductSpace Set
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
variable {f : F → 𝕜} {f' x : F}
/-- A function `f` has the gradient `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. -/
def HasGradientAtFilter (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) (L : Filter F) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x L
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def HasGradientWithinAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' : F) (s : Set F) (x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def HasGradientAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def gradientWithin (f : F → 𝕜) (s : Set F) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
Denoted as `∇` within the Gradient namespace.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def gradient (f : F → 𝕜) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderiv 𝕜 f x)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Gradient] notation "∇" => gradient
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped Gradient
variable {s : Set F} {L : Filter F}
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set F} :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {s : Set F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f frechet s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} :
HasFDerivAt f frechet x ↔ HasGradientAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
alias ⟨HasGradientWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, _⟩ := hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt
alias ⟨HasGradientAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivAt.hasGradientAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ∇ f x = 0 := by
rw [gradient, fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
theorem HasGradientAt.unique {gradf gradg : F}
(hf : HasGradientAt f gradf x) (hg : HasGradientAt f gradg x) :
gradf = gradg :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).injective (hf.hasFDerivAt.unique hg.hasFDerivAt)
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, gradient, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderiv 𝕜 f x)]
exact h.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasGradientAt.differentiableAt (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasGradientWithinAt f (gradientWithin f s x) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, gradientWithin,
(toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)]
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasGradientWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_univ : HasGradientWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasGradientAt f f' x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt]
exact hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasGradientAt
theorem HasGradientAt.gradient (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) : ∇ f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasGradientAt.unique h
theorem gradient_eq {f' : F → F} (h : ∀ x, HasGradientAt f (f' x) x) : ∇ f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).gradient
section OneDimension
variable {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {g' u : 𝕜} {L' : Filter 𝕜}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) g' := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasDerivAtFilter, this]
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) g' = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasGradientAtFilter, ← this]
theorem HasGradientAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasGradientAt g g' u) :
HasDerivAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt] at h
simpa using h
theorem HasDerivAt.hasGradientAt (h : HasDerivAt g g' u) :
HasGradientAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt]
simpa
theorem gradient_eq_deriv : ∇ g u = starRingEnd 𝕜 (deriv g u) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g u
· rw [h.hasGradientAt.hasDerivAt.deriv, RCLike.conj_conj]
· rw [gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
end OneDimension
section OneDimensionReal
variable {g : ℝ → ℝ} {g' u : ℝ} {L' : Filter ℝ}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter' (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L' := h.hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter' (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L' := h.hasGradientAtFilter
theorem HasGradientAt.hasDerivAt' (h : HasGradientAt g g' u) :
HasDerivAt g g' u := h.hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.hasGradientAt' (h : HasDerivAt g g' u) :
HasGradientAt g g' u := h.hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_deriv' : ∇ g u = deriv g u := gradient_eq_deriv
end OneDimensionReal
open Filter
section GradientProperties
theorem hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x L ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_isLittleO : HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_tendsto :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasGradientAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set F} (y : F) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set F} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero : HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
(fun h => f (x + h) - f x - ⟪f', h⟫) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
end GradientProperties
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of the Gradient -/
variable {f₀ f₁ : F → 𝕜} {f₀' f₁' : F} {t : Set F}
|
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasGradientAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : f₀' = f₁') : HasGradientAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasGradientAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Gradient/Basic.lean | 257 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Extension
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Defs
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integral
/-!
# Algebraically Closed Field
In this file we define the typeclass for algebraically closed fields and algebraic closures,
and prove some of their properties.
## Main Definitions
- `IsAlgClosed k` is the typeclass saying `k` is an algebraically closed field, i.e. every
polynomial in `k` splits.
- `IsAlgClosure R K` is the typeclass saying `K` is an algebraic closure of `R`, where `R` is a
commutative ring. This means that the map from `R` to `K` is injective, and `K` is
algebraically closed and algebraic over `R`
- `IsAlgClosed.lift` is a map from an algebraic extension `L` of `R`, into any algebraically
closed extension of `R`.
- `IsAlgClosure.equiv` is a proof that any two algebraic closures of the
same field are isomorphic.
## Tags
algebraic closure, algebraically closed
## Main results
- `IsAlgClosure.of_splits`: if `K / k` is algebraic, and every monic irreducible polynomial over
`k` splits in `K`, then `K` is algebraically closed (in fact an algebraic closure of `k`).
For the stronger fact that only requires every such polynomial has a root in `K`,
see `IsAlgClosure.of_exist_roots`.
Reference: <https://kconrad.math.uconn.edu/blurbs/galoistheory/algclosure.pdf>, Theorem 2
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
variable (k : Type u) [Field k]
/-- Typeclass for algebraically closed fields.
To show `Polynomial.Splits p f` for an arbitrary ring homomorphism `f`,
see `IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain` and `IsAlgClosed.splits_domain`.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "The definition of `IsAlgClosed` in mathlib is 09GR (4)"]
class IsAlgClosed : Prop where
splits : ∀ p : k[X], p.Splits <| RingHom.id k
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `k` is algebraically closed.
See also `IsAlgClosed.splits_domain` for the case where `K` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain {k K : Type*} [Field k] [IsAlgClosed k] [CommRing K]
{f : K →+* k} (p : K[X]) : p.Splits f := by
convert IsAlgClosed.splits (p.map f); simp [splits_map_iff]
/-- Every polynomial splits in the field extension `f : K →+* k` if `K` is algebraically closed.
See also `IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain` for the case where `k` is algebraically closed.
-/
theorem IsAlgClosed.splits_domain {k K : Type*} [Field k] [IsAlgClosed k] [Field K] {f : k →+* K}
(p : k[X]) : p.Splits f :=
Polynomial.splits_of_splits_id _ <| IsAlgClosed.splits _
namespace IsAlgClosed
variable {k}
/--
If `k` is algebraically closed, then every nonconstant polynomial has a root.
-/
@[stacks 09GR "(4) ⟹ (3)"]
theorem exists_root [IsAlgClosed k] (p : k[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
exists_root_of_splits _ (IsAlgClosed.splits p) hp
theorem exists_pow_nat_eq [IsAlgClosed k] (x : k) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : ∃ z, z ^ n = x := by
have : degree (X ^ n - C x) ≠ 0 := by
rw [degree_X_pow_sub_C hn x]
exact ne_of_gt (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 hn)
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := exists_root (X ^ n - C x) this
use z
simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_pow, eval_sub, IsRoot.def] at hz
exact sub_eq_zero.1 hz
theorem exists_eq_mul_self [IsAlgClosed k] (x : k) : ∃ z, x = z * z := by
rcases exists_pow_nat_eq x zero_lt_two with ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact ⟨z, sq z⟩
theorem roots_eq_zero_iff [IsAlgClosed k] {p : k[X]} :
p.roots = 0 ↔ p = Polynomial.C (p.coeff 0) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hp => by rw [hp, roots_C]⟩
rcases le_or_lt (degree p) 0 with hd | hd
· exact eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hd
· obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_root p hd.ne'
rw [← mem_roots (ne_zero_of_degree_gt hd), h] at hz
simp at hz
theorem exists_eval₂_eq_zero_of_injective {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [IsAlgClosed k] (f : R →+* k)
(hf : Function.Injective f) (p : R[X]) (hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, p.eval₂ f x = 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root (p.map f) (by rwa [degree_map_eq_of_injective hf])
| ⟨x, by rwa [eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← IsRoot]⟩
theorem exists_eval₂_eq_zero {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [IsAlgClosed k] (f : R →+* k) (p : R[X])
(hp : p.degree ≠ 0) : ∃ x, p.eval₂ f x = 0 :=
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsAlgClosed/Basic.lean | 114 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Finite
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.NoAtoms
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.SFinite
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 159 | 164 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Engel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
/-!
# Engel subalgebras
This file defines Engel subalgebras of a Lie algebra and provides basic related properties.
The Engel subalgebra `LieSubalgebra.Engel R x` consists of
all `y : L` such that `(ad R L x)^n` kills `y` for some `n`.
## Main results
Engel subalgebras are self-normalizing (`LieSubalgebra.normalizer_engel`),
and minimal ones are nilpotent (TODO), hence Cartan subalgebras.
* `LieSubalgebra.normalizer_eq_self_of_engel_le`:
Lie subalgebras containing an Engel subalgebra are self-normalizing,
provided the ambient Lie algebra is Artinian.
* `LieSubalgebra.isNilpotent_of_forall_le_engel`:
A Lie subalgebra of a Noetherian Lie algebra is nilpotent
if it is contained in the Engel subalgebra of all its elements.
-/
open LieAlgebra LieModule
variable {R L M : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable (R)
/-- The Engel subalgebra `Engel R x` consists of
all `y : L` such that `(ad R L x)^n` kills `y` for some `n`.
Engel subalgebras are self-normalizing (`LieSubalgebra.normalizer_engel`),
and minimal ones are nilpotent, hence Cartan subalgebras. -/
@[simps!]
def engel (x : L) : LieSubalgebra R L :=
{ (ad R L x).maxGenEigenspace 0 with
lie_mem' := by
simp only [AddSubsemigroup.mem_carrier, AddSubmonoid.mem_toSubsemigroup,
Submodule.mem_toAddSubmonoid, Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul,
sub_zero, forall_exists_index]
intro y z m hm n hn
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
rw [ad_pow_lie]
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro ij hij
obtain (h|h) : m ≤ ij.1 ∨ n ≤ ij.2 := by rw [Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hij; omega
all_goals simp [Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le h, hm, hn] }
lemma mem_engel_iff (x y : L) :
y ∈ engel R x ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ((ad R L x) ^ n) y = 0 :=
(Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace _ _ _).trans <| by simp only [zero_smul, sub_zero]
lemma self_mem_engel (x : L) : x ∈ engel R x := by
simp only [mem_engel_iff]
exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma engel_zero : engel R (0 : L) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
rw [mem_engel_iff, LieHom.map_zero]
use 1
simp only [pow_one, LinearMap.zero_apply]
/-- Engel subalgebras are self-normalizing.
See `LieSubalgebra.normalizer_eq_self_of_engel_le` for a proof that Lie-subalgebras
containing an Engel subalgebra are also self-normalizing,
provided that the ambient Lie algebra is artinina. -/
@[simp]
lemma normalizer_engel (x : L) : normalizer (engel R x) = engel R x := by
apply le_antisymm _ (le_normalizer _)
intro y hy
rw [mem_normalizer_iff] at hy
specialize hy x (self_mem_engel R x)
rw [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff (G := L), mem_engel_iff] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [mem_engel_iff]
use n+1
rw [pow_succ, Module.End.mul_apply]
exact hn
variable {R}
open Filter in
/-- A Lie-subalgebra of an Artinian Lie algebra is self-normalizing
if it contains an Engel subalgebra.
See `LieSubalgebra.normalizer_engel` for a proof that Engel subalgebras are self-normalizing,
avoiding the Artinian condition. -/
lemma normalizer_eq_self_of_engel_le [IsArtinian R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) (x : L) (h : engel R x ≤ H) :
normalizer H = H := by
set N := normalizer H
apply le_antisymm _ (le_normalizer H)
calc N.toSubmodule ≤ (engel R x).toSubmodule ⊔ H.toSubmodule := ?_
_ = H := by rwa [sup_eq_right]
have aux₁ : ∀ n ∈ N, ⁅x, n⁆ ∈ H := by
intro n hn
rw [mem_normalizer_iff] at hn
specialize hn x (h (self_mem_engel R x))
rwa [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff (G := L)]
have aux₂ : ∀ n ∈ N, ⁅x, n⁆ ∈ N := fun n hn ↦ le_normalizer H (aux₁ _ hn)
let dx : N →ₗ[R] N := (ad R L x).restrict aux₂
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, Codisjoint (LinearMap.ker (dx ^ b)) (LinearMap.range (dx ^ b)) :=
eventually_atTop.mp <| dx.eventually_codisjoint_ker_pow_range_pow
specialize hk (k+1) (Nat.le_add_right k 1)
rw [← Submodule.map_subtype_top N.toSubmodule, Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply hk
· rw [← Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply le_sup_of_le_left
rw [Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
intro y hy
simp only [Submodule.mem_comap, mem_engel_iff, mem_toSubmodule]
use k+1
clear hk; revert hy
generalize k+1 = k
induction k generalizing y with
| zero =>
cases y; intro hy; simp only [pow_zero, Module.End.one_apply]
exact (AddSubmonoid.mk_eq_zero N.toAddSubmonoid).mp hy
| succ k ih => simp only [pow_succ, LinearMap.mem_ker, Module.End.mul_apply] at ih ⊢; apply ih
· rw [← Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply le_sup_of_le_right
rw [Submodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [pow_succ', Module.End.mul_apply, Submodule.mem_comap, mem_toSubmodule]
apply aux₁
| simp only [Submodule.coe_subtype, SetLike.coe_mem]
/-- A Lie subalgebra of a Noetherian Lie algebra is nilpotent
if it is contained in the Engel subalgebra of all its elements. -/
lemma isNilpotent_of_forall_le_engel [IsNoetherian R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) (h : ∀ x ∈ H, H ≤ engel R x) :
LieRing.IsNilpotent H := by
rw [LieAlgebra.isNilpotent_iff_forall (R := R)]
intro x
let K : ℕ →o Submodule R H :=
⟨fun n ↦ LinearMap.ker ((ad R H x) ^ n), fun m n hmn ↦ ?mono⟩
case mono =>
intro y hy
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker] at hy ⊢
exact Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le hmn hy
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.mpr inferInstance K
use n
ext y
rw [coe_ad_pow]
specialize h x x.2 y.2
rw [mem_engel_iff] at h
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := h
obtain (hmn|hmn) : m ≤ n ∨ n ≤ m := le_total m n
· exact Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le hmn hm
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/EngelSubalgebra.lean | 140 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem mem_ground_of_mem_of_subset (hX : X ⊆ M.E) (heX : e ∈ X) : e ∈ M.E :=
hX heX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem insert_subset_ground {e : α} {X : Set α} {M : Matroid α}
(he : e ∈ M.E) (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : insert e X ⊆ M.E :=
insert_subset he hX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_subset_ground {M : Matroid α} : M.E ⊆ M.E :=
rfl.subset
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])] empty_subset union_subset iUnion_subset
end aesop
section IsBase
| variable {B B₁ B₂ : Set α}
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 387 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Ideal
/-!
# Ideal operations for Lie algebras
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, there is a natural action of the Lie ideals of `L`
on the Lie submodules of `M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, this
provides a pairing of Lie ideals which is especially important. For example, it can be used to
define solvability / nilpotency of a Lie algebra via the derived / lower-central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.hasBracket`
* `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span`
* `LieIdeal.map_bracket_le`
* `LieIdeal.comap_bracket_le`
## Notation
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` and a Lie
ideal `I ⊆ L`, we introduce the notation `⁅I, N⁆` for the Lie submodule of `M` corresponding to
the action defined in this file.
## Tags
lie algebra, ideal operation
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
theorem map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : Set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
theorem map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf
theorem le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : Set M).subset_preimage_image f
theorem comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact (N : Set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_incl : map N.incl (comap N.incl N') = N ⊓ N' := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj]
exact (N : Submodule R M).map_comap_subtype N'
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M₂] (I J : LieIdeal R L)
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the set of Lie ideals of `L` acts on the set
of submodules of `M`. -/
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }⟩
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } :=
rfl
/-- See also `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'` and
`LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_tensor_map_range`. -/
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' _ ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hm'
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ _ _ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' _ hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
| rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' [LieModule R L M] :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 96 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Tape
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Computability.PostTuringMachine
/-!
# Turing machines
The files `PostTuringMachine.lean` and `TuringMachine.lean` define
a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
`PostTuringMachine.lean` covers the TM0 model and TM1 model;
`TuringMachine.lean` adds the TM2 model.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-!
## The TM2 model
The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model, replacing it with an arbitrary (finite)
collection of stacks, each with elements of different types (the alphabet of stack `k : K` is
`Γ k`). The statements are:
* `push k (f : σ → Γ k) q` puts `f a` on the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `pop k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, and removes this element from the stack, then does `q`.
* `peek k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `load (f : σ → σ) q` reads nothing but applies `f` to the internal state, then does `q`.
* `branch (f : σ → Bool) qtrue qfalse` does `qtrue` or `qfalse` according to `f a`.
* `goto (f : σ → Λ)` jumps to label `f a`.
* `halt` halts on the next step.
The configuration is a tuple `(l, var, stk)` where `l : Option Λ` is the current label to run or
`none` for the halting state, `var : σ` is the (finite) internal state, and `stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)`
is the collection of stacks. (Note that unlike the `TM0` and `TM1` models, these are not
`ListBlank`s, they have definite ends that can be detected by the `pop` command.)
Given a designated stack `k` and a value `L : List (Γ k)`, the initial configuration has all the
stacks empty except the designated "input" stack; in `eval` this designated stack also functions
as the output stack.
-/
namespace TM2
variable {K : Type*}
-- Index type of stacks
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
-- Type of stack elements
variable (Λ : Type*)
-- Type of function labels
variable (σ : Type*)
-- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model,
replacing it with an arbitrary (finite) collection of stacks.
The operation `push` puts an element on one of the stacks,
and `pop` removes an element from a stack (and modifying the
internal state based on the result). `peek` modifies the
internal state but does not remove an element. -/
inductive Stmt
| push : ∀ k, (σ → Γ k) → Stmt → Stmt
| peek : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| pop : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| load : (σ → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| branch : (σ → Bool) → Stmt → Stmt → Stmt
| goto : (σ → Λ) → Stmt
| halt : Stmt
open Stmt
instance Stmt.inhabited : Inhabited (Stmt Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨halt⟩
/-- A configuration in the TM2 model is a label (or `none` for the halt state), the state of
local variables, and the stacks. (Note that the stacks are not `ListBlank`s, they have a definite
size.) -/
structure Cfg where
/-- The current label to run (or `none` for the halting state) -/
l : Option Λ
/-- The internal state -/
var : σ
/-- The (finite) collection of internal stacks -/
stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)
instance Cfg.inhabited [Inhabited σ] : Inhabited (Cfg Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {Γ Λ σ}
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def stepAux : Stmt Γ Λ σ → σ → (∀ k, List (Γ k)) → Cfg Γ Λ σ
| push k f q, v, S => stepAux q v (update S k (f v :: S k))
| peek k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) S
| pop k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) (update S k (S k).tail)
| load a q, v, S => stepAux q (a v) S
| branch f q₁ q₂, v, S => cond (f v) (stepAux q₁ v S) (stepAux q₂ v S)
| goto f, v, S => ⟨some (f v), v, S⟩
| halt, v, S => ⟨none, v, S⟩
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Option (Cfg Γ Λ σ)
| ⟨none, _, _⟩ => none
| ⟨some l, v, S⟩ => some (stepAux (M l) v S)
attribute [simp] stepAux.eq_1 stepAux.eq_2 stepAux.eq_3
stepAux.eq_4 stepAux.eq_5 stepAux.eq_6 stepAux.eq_7 step.eq_1 step.eq_2
/-- The (reflexive) reachability relation for the TM2 model. -/
def Reaches (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Cfg Γ Λ σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ step M a
end
/-- Given a set `S` of states, `SupportsStmt S q` means that `q` only jumps to states in `S`. -/
def SupportsStmt (S : Finset Λ) : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Prop
| push _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| peek _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| pop _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| load _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| branch _ q₁ q₂ => SupportsStmt S q₁ ∧ SupportsStmt S q₂
| goto l => ∀ v, l v ∈ S
| halt => True
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of subtree statements in a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Stmt Γ Λ σ)
| Q@(push _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(peek _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(pop _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch _ q₁ q₂) => insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(goto _) => {Q}
| Q@halt => {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q ∈ stmts₁ q := by
cases q <;> simp only [Finset.mem_insert_self, Finset.mem_singleton_self, stmts₁]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ := by
classical
intro h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁
induction q₂ with (
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_union] at h₁₂)
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_left _ (IH₁ h₁₂))
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_right _ (IH₂ h₁₂))
| goto l => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| halt => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| load _ q IH | _ _ _ q IH =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂)
theorem stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂)
(hs : SupportsStmt S q₂) : SupportsStmt S q₁ := by
induction q₂ with
simp only [stmts₁, SupportsStmt, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h hs
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ => rcases h with (rfl | h | h); exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2]
| goto l => subst h; exact hs
| halt => subst h; trivial
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => rcases h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact hs; exact IH h hs]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of statements accessible from initial set `S` of labels. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Option (Stmt Γ Λ σ)) :=
Finset.insertNone (S.biUnion fun q ↦ stmts₁ (M q))
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) :
some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h₂ ↦ ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
end
variable [Inhabited Λ]
/-- Given a TM2 machine `M` and a set `S` of states, `Supports M S` means that all states in
`S` jump only to other states in `S`. -/
def Supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) :=
default ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, SupportsStmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supportsStmt {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ}
(ss : Supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → SupportsStmt S q := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h ↦ stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
variable [DecidableEq K]
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) {S : Finset Λ} (ss : Supports M S) :
∀ {c c' : Cfg Γ Λ σ}, c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S → c'.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩, c', h₁, h₂ => by
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (Finset.some_mem_insertNone.1 h₂)
simp only [step, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h₁; subst c'
revert h₂; induction M l₁ generalizing v T with intro hs
| branch p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold stepAux; cases p v
· exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2
· exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1
| goto => exact Finset.some_mem_insertNone.2 (hs _)
| halt => apply Multiset.mem_cons_self
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => exact IH _ _ hs
variable [Inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state of the TM2 model. The input is provided on a designated stack. -/
def init (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Cfg Γ Λ σ :=
⟨some default, default, update (fun _ ↦ []) k L⟩
/-- Evaluates a TM2 program to completion, with the output on the same stack as the input. -/
def eval (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Part (List (Γ k)) :=
(Turing.eval (step M) (init k L)).map fun c ↦ c.stk k
end TM2
/-!
## TM2 emulator in TM1
To prove that TM2 computable functions are TM1 computable, we need to reduce each TM2 program to a
TM1 program. So suppose a TM2 program is given. This program has to maintain a whole collection of
stacks, but we have only one tape, so we must "multiplex" them all together. Pictorially, if stack
1 contains `[a, b]` and stack 2 contains `[c, d, e, f]` then the tape looks like this:
```
bottom: ... | _ | T | _ | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 1: ... | _ | b | a | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 2: ... | _ | f | e | d | c | _ | ...
```
where a tape element is a vertical slice through the diagram. Here the alphabet is
`Γ' := Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)`, where:
* `bottom : Bool` is marked only in one place, the initial position of the TM, and represents the
tail of all stacks. It is never modified.
* `stk k : Option (Γ k)` is the value of the `k`-th stack, if in range, otherwise `none` (which is
the blank value). Note that the head of the stack is at the far end; this is so that push and pop
don't have to do any shifting.
In "resting" position, the TM is sitting at the position marked `bottom`. For non-stack actions,
it operates in place, but for the stack actions `push`, `peek`, and `pop`, it must shuttle to the
end of the appropriate stack, make its changes, and then return to the bottom. So the states are:
* `normal (l : Λ)`: waiting at `bottom` to execute function `l`
* `go k (s : StAct k) (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the right to get to the end of stack `k` in
order to perform stack action `s`, and later continue with executing `q`
* `ret (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the left after having performed a stack action, and executing
`q` once we arrive
Because of the shuttling, emulation overhead is `O(n)`, where `n` is the current maximum of the
length of all stacks. Therefore a program that takes `k` steps to run in TM2 takes `O((m+k)k)`
steps to run when emulated in TM1, where `m` is the length of the input.
-/
namespace TM2to1
-- A displaced lemma proved in unnecessary generality
theorem stk_nth_val {K : Type*} {Γ : K → Type*} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} {k S} (n)
(hL : ListBlank.map (proj k) L = ListBlank.mk (List.map some S).reverse) :
L.nth n k = S.reverse[n]? := by
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ← List.map_reverse, ListBlank.nth_mk,
List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.getElem?_map]
cases S.reverse[n]? <;> rfl
variable (K : Type*)
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
variable {Λ σ : Type*}
/-- The alphabet of the TM2 simulator on TM1 is a marker for the stack bottom,
plus a vector of stack elements for each stack, or none if the stack does not extend this far. -/
def Γ' :=
Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)
variable {K Γ}
instance Γ'.inhabited : Inhabited (Γ' K Γ) :=
⟨⟨false, fun _ ↦ none⟩⟩
instance Γ'.fintype [DecidableEq K] [Fintype K] [∀ k, Fintype (Γ k)] : Fintype (Γ' K Γ) :=
instFintypeProd _ _
/-- The bottom marker is fixed throughout the calculation, so we use the `addBottom` function
to express the program state in terms of a tape with only the stacks themselves. -/
def addBottom (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : ListBlank (Γ' K Γ) :=
ListBlank.cons (true, L.head) (L.tail.map ⟨Prod.mk false, rfl⟩)
theorem addBottom_map (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(addBottom L).map ⟨Prod.snd, by rfl⟩ = L := by
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.map_cons]
convert ListBlank.cons_head_tail L
generalize ListBlank.tail L = L'
refine L'.induction_on fun l ↦ ?_; simp
theorem addBottom_modifyNth (f : (∀ k, Option (Γ k)) → ∀ k, Option (Γ k))
(L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
(addBottom L).modifyNth (fun a ↦ (a.1, f a.2)) n = addBottom (L.modifyNth f n) := by
cases n <;>
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.tail_cons]
congr; symm; apply ListBlank.map_modifyNth; intro; rfl
theorem addBottom_nth_snd (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth n).2 = L.nth n := by
conv => rhs; rw [← addBottom_map L, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_nth_succ_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth (n + 1)).1 = false := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, addBottom, ListBlank.tail_cons, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_head_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : (addBottom L).head.1 = true := by
rw [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons]
variable (K Γ σ) in
/-- A stack action is a command that interacts with the top of a stack. Our default position
is at the bottom of all the stacks, so we have to hold on to this action while going to the end
to modify the stack. -/
inductive StAct (k : K)
| push : (σ → Γ k) → StAct k
| peek : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
| pop : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
instance StAct.inhabited {k : K} : Inhabited (StAct K Γ σ k) :=
⟨StAct.peek fun s _ ↦ s⟩
section
open StAct
/-- The TM2 statement corresponding to a stack action. -/
def stRun {k : K} : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ
| push f => TM2.Stmt.push k f
| peek f => TM2.Stmt.peek k f
| pop f => TM2.Stmt.pop k f
/-- The effect of a stack action on the local variables, given the value of the stack. -/
def stVar {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → σ
| push _ => v
| peek f => f v l.head?
| pop f => f v l.head?
/-- The effect of a stack action on the stack. -/
def stWrite {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → List (Γ k)
| push f => f v :: l
| peek _ => l
| pop _ => l.tail
/-- We have partitioned the TM2 statements into "stack actions", which require going to the end
of the stack, and all other actions, which do not. This is a modified recursor which lumps the
stack actions into one. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def stmtStRec.{l} {motive : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Sort l}
(run : ∀ (k) (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q) (_ : motive q), motive (stRun s q))
(load : ∀ (a q) (_ : motive q), motive (TM2.Stmt.load a q))
(branch : ∀ (p q₁ q₂) (_ : motive q₁) (_ : motive q₂), motive (TM2.Stmt.branch p q₁ q₂))
(goto : ∀ l, motive (TM2.Stmt.goto l)) (halt : motive TM2.Stmt.halt) : ∀ n, motive n
| TM2.Stmt.push _ f q => run _ (push f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.peek _ f q => run _ (peek f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.pop _ f q => run _ (pop f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => load _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ =>
branch _ _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₁) (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto _ => goto _
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem supports_run (S : Finset Λ) {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
TM2.SupportsStmt S (stRun s q) ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S q := by
cases s <;> rfl
end
variable (K Γ Λ σ)
/-- The machine states of the TM2 emulator. We can either be in a normal state when waiting for the
next TM2 action, or we can be in the "go" and "return" states to go to the top of the stack and
return to the bottom, respectively. -/
inductive Λ'
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| go (k : K) : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
| ret : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
variable {K Γ Λ σ}
open Λ'
instance Λ'.inhabited [Inhabited Λ] : Inhabited (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨normal default⟩
open TM1.Stmt
| section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The program corresponding to state transitions at the end of a stack. Here we start out just
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 463 | 466 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Box
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.EisensteinSeries.Defs
/-!
# Uniform convergence of Eisenstein series
We show that the sum of `eisSummand` converges locally uniformly on `ℍ` to the Eisenstein series
of weight `k` and level `Γ(N)` with congruence condition `a : Fin 2 → ZMod N`.
## Outline of argument
The key lemma `r_mul_max_le` shows that, for `z ∈ ℍ` and `c, d ∈ ℤ` (not both zero),
`|c z + d|` is bounded below by `r z * max (|c|, |d|)`, where `r z` is an explicit function of `z`
(independent of `c, d`) satisfying `0 < r z < 1` for all `z`.
We then show in `summable_one_div_rpow_max` that the sum of `max (|c|, |d|) ^ (-k)` over
`(c, d) ∈ ℤ × ℤ` is convergent for `2 < k`. This is proved by decomposing `ℤ × ℤ` using the
`Finset.box` lemmas.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex UpperHalfPlane Set Finset CongruenceSubgroup Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane
variable (z : ℍ)
namespace EisensteinSeries
lemma norm_eq_max_natAbs (x : Fin 2 → ℤ) : ‖x‖ = max (x 0).natAbs (x 1).natAbs := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_natCast, NNReal.coe_inj, Nat.cast_max]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ ?_
simp only [pi_nnnorm_le_iff, Fin.forall_fin_two, max_le_iff, NNReal.natCast_natAbs]
section bounding_functions
/-- Auxiliary function used for bounding Eisenstein series, defined as
`z.im ^ 2 / (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2)`. -/
def r1 : ℝ := z.im ^ 2 / (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2)
lemma r1_eq : r1 z = 1 / ((z.re / z.im) ^ 2 + 1) := by
rw [div_pow, div_add_one (by positivity), one_div_div, r1]
lemma r1_pos : 0 < r1 z := by
dsimp only [r1]
positivity
/-- For `c, d ∈ ℝ` with `1 ≤ d ^ 2`, we have `r1 z ≤ |c * z + d| ^ 2`. -/
lemma r1_aux_bound (c : ℝ) {d : ℝ} (hd : 1 ≤ d ^ 2) :
r1 z ≤ (c * z.re + d) ^ 2 + (c * z.im) ^ 2 := by
have H1 : (c * z.re + d) ^ 2 + (c * z.im) ^ 2 =
c ^ 2 * (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2) + d * 2 * c * z.re + d ^ 2 := by ring
have H2 : (c ^ 2 * (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2) + d * 2 * c * z.re + d ^ 2) * (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2)
- z.im ^ 2 = (c * (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2) + d * z.re) ^ 2 + (d ^ 2 - 1) * z.im ^ 2 := by ring
rw [r1, H1, div_le_iff₀ (by positivity), ← sub_nonneg, H2]
exact add_nonneg (sq_nonneg _) (mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hd) (sq_nonneg _))
/-- This function is used to give an upper bound on the summands in Eisenstein series; it is
defined by `z ↦ min z.im √(z.im ^ 2 / (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2))`. -/
def r : ℝ := min z.im √(r1 z)
lemma r_pos : 0 < r z := by
simp only [r, lt_min_iff, im_pos, Real.sqrt_pos, r1_pos, and_self]
lemma r_lower_bound_on_verticalStrip {A B : ℝ} (h : 0 < B) (hz : z ∈ verticalStrip A B) :
r ⟨⟨A, B⟩, h⟩ ≤ r z := by
apply min_le_min hz.2
rw [Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (by apply (r1_pos z).le)]
simp only [r1_eq, div_pow, one_div]
rw [inv_le_inv₀ (by positivity) (by positivity), add_le_add_iff_right, ← even_two.pow_abs]
gcongr
exacts [hz.1, hz.2]
lemma auxbound1 {c : ℝ} (d : ℝ) (hc : 1 ≤ c ^ 2) : r z ≤ ‖c * (z : ℂ) + d‖ := by
rcases z with ⟨z, hz⟩
have H1 : z.im ≤ √((c * z.re + d) ^ 2 + (c * z).im ^ 2) := by
rw [Real.le_sqrt' hz, im_ofReal_mul, mul_pow]
exact (le_mul_of_one_le_left (sq_nonneg _) hc).trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_left (sq_nonneg _)
simpa only [r, norm_def, normSq_apply, add_re, re_ofReal_mul, coe_re, ← pow_two, add_im, mul_im,
coe_im, ofReal_im, zero_mul, add_zero, min_le_iff] using Or.inl H1
lemma auxbound2 (c : ℝ) {d : ℝ} (hd : 1 ≤ d ^ 2) : r z ≤ ‖c * (z : ℂ) + d‖ := by
have H1 : √(r1 z) ≤ √((c * z.re + d) ^ 2 + (c * z.im) ^ 2) :=
(Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (by positivity)).mpr (r1_aux_bound _ _ hd)
simpa only [r, norm_def, normSq_apply, add_re, re_ofReal_mul, coe_re, ofReal_re, ← pow_two,
add_im, im_ofReal_mul, coe_im, ofReal_im, add_zero, min_le_iff] using Or.inr H1
lemma div_max_sq_ge_one (x : Fin 2 → ℤ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
1 ≤ (x 0 / ‖x‖) ^ 2 ∨ 1 ≤ (x 1 / ‖x‖) ^ 2 := by
refine (max_choice (x 0).natAbs (x 1).natAbs).imp (fun H0 ↦ ?_) (fun H1 ↦ ?_)
· have : x 0 ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← norm_ne_zero_iff, norm_eq_max_natAbs, H0, Nat.cast_ne_zero, Int.natAbs_ne_zero] at hx
simp only [norm_eq_max_natAbs, H0, Int.cast_natAbs, Int.cast_abs, div_pow, sq_abs, ne_eq,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, pow_eq_zero_iff, Int.cast_eq_zero, this, div_self,
le_refl]
· have : x 1 ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← norm_ne_zero_iff, norm_eq_max_natAbs, H1, Nat.cast_ne_zero, Int.natAbs_ne_zero] at hx
simp only [norm_eq_max_natAbs, H1, Int.cast_natAbs, Int.cast_abs, div_pow, sq_abs, ne_eq,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, pow_eq_zero_iff, Int.cast_eq_zero, this, div_self,
le_refl]
lemma r_mul_max_le {x : Fin 2 → ℤ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : r z * ‖x‖ ≤ ‖x 0 * (z : ℂ) + x 1‖ := by
have hn0 : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by rwa [norm_ne_zero_iff]
have h11 : x 0 * (z : ℂ) + x 1 = (x 0 / ‖x‖ * z + x 1 / ‖x‖) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, ← add_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (mod_cast hn0)]
rw [norm_eq_max_natAbs, h11, norm_mul, norm_real, norm_norm, norm_eq_max_natAbs]
gcongr
· rcases div_max_sq_ge_one x hx with H1 | H2
· simpa only [norm_eq_max_natAbs, ofReal_div, ofReal_intCast] using auxbound1 z (x 1 / ‖x‖) H1
· simpa only [norm_eq_max_natAbs, ofReal_div, ofReal_intCast] using auxbound2 z (x 0 / ‖x‖) H2
| /-- Upper bound for the summand `|c * z + d| ^ (-k)`, as a product of a function of `z` and a
function of `c, d`. -/
lemma summand_bound {k : ℝ} (hk : 0 ≤ k) (x : Fin 2 → ℤ) :
‖x 0 * (z : ℂ) + x 1‖ ^ (-k) ≤ (r z) ^ (-k) * ‖x‖ ^ (-k) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, Pi.zero_apply, Int.cast_zero, zero_mul, add_zero, norm_zero]
by_cases h : -k = 0
· rw [h, Real.rpow_zero, Real.rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow h, mul_zero]
· rw [← Real.mul_rpow (r_pos _).le (norm_nonneg _)]
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (mul_pos (r_pos _) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) (r_mul_max_le z hx)
(neg_nonpos.mpr hk)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/EisensteinSeries/UniformConvergence.lean | 123 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Action.Synonym
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements
This file defines typeclasses to reason about monotonicity of the operations
* `b ↦ a • b`, "left scalar multiplication"
* `a ↦ a • b`, "right scalar multiplication"
We use eight typeclasses to encode the various properties we care about for those two operations.
These typeclasses are meant to be mostly internal to this file, to set up each lemma in the
appropriate generality.
Less granular typeclasses like `OrderedAddCommMonoid`, `LinearOrderedField`, `OrderedSMul` should be
enough for most purposes, and the system is set up so that they imply the correct granular
typeclasses here. If those are enough for you, you may stop reading here! Else, beware that what
follows is a bit technical.
## Definitions
In all that follows, `α` and `β` are orders which have a `0` and such that `α` acts on `β` by scalar
multiplication. Note however that we do not use lawfulness of this action in most of the file. Hence
`•` should be considered here as a mostly arbitrary function `α → β → β`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about left scalar multiplication (`b ↦ a • b`):
* `PosSMulMono`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `b₁ ≤ b₂` implies `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulStrictMono`: If `a > 0`, then `b₁ < b₂` implies `a • b₁ < a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLT`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `a • b₁ < a • b₂` implies `b₁ < b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLE`: If `a > 0`, then `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` implies `b₁ ≤ b₂`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about right scalar multiplication (`a ↦ a • b`):
* `SMulPosMono`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ ≤ a₂` implies `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosStrictMono`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ < a₂` implies `a₁ • b < a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ • b < a₂ • b` implies `a₁ < a₂`.
* `SMulPosReflectLE`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` implies `a₁ ≤ a₂`.
## Constructors
The four typeclasses about nonnegativity can usually be checked only on positive inputs due to their
condition becoming trivial when `a = 0` or `b = 0`. We therefore make the following constructors
available: `PosSMulMono.of_pos`, `PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos`, `SMulPosMono.of_pos`,
`SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos`
## Implications
As `α` and `β` get more and more structure, those typeclasses end up being equivalent. The commonly
used implications are:
* When `α`, `β` are partial orders:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulMono`
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosReflectLT`
* When `β` is a linear order:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* `PosSMulReflectLT → PosSMulMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLT → SMulPosMono` (not registered as instance)
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a linear order:
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosReflectLE`
* When `α` is an ordered ring, `β` an ordered group and also an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulStrictMono → SMulPosStrictMono`
* When `α` is an linear ordered semifield, `β` is an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* When `α` is a semiring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a ring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `SMulPosMono → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
Further, the bundled non-granular typeclasses imply the granular ones like so:
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulStrictMono`
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulReflectLT`
Unless otherwise stated, all these implications are registered as instances,
which means that in practice you should not worry about these implications.
However, if you encounter a case where you think a statement is true but
not covered by the current implications, please bring it up on Zulip!
## Implementation notes
This file uses custom typeclasses instead of abbreviations of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
because:
* They get displayed as classes in the docs. In particular, one can see their list of instances,
instead of their instances being invariably dumped to the `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
list.
* They don't pollute other typeclass searches. Having many abbreviations of the same typeclass for
different purposes always felt like a performance issue (more instances with the same key, for no
added benefit), and indeed making the classes here abbreviation previous creates timeouts due to
the higher number of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` instances.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`/`SMulPosReflectLE` do not fit in the framework since they relate `≤` on two
different types. So we would have to generalise `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` to three
types and two relations.
* Very minor, but the constructors let you work with `a : α`, `h : 0 ≤ a` instead of
`a : {a : α // 0 ≤ a}`. This actually makes some instances surprisingly cleaner to prove.
* The `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` framework is only useful to automate very simple logic
anyway. It is easily copied over.
In the future, it would be good to make the corresponding typeclasses in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled` custom typeclasses too.
## TODO
This file acts as a substitute for `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SMul`. We now need to
* finish the transition by deleting the duplicate lemmas
* rearrange the non-duplicate lemmas into new files
* generalise (most of) the lemmas from `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module` to here
* rethink `OrderedSMul`
-/
open OrderDual
variable (α β : Type*)
section Defs
variable [SMul α β] [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `b₁ < b₂ → a • b₁ < a • b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ < b₂) : a • b₁ < a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ < a • b₂) : b₁ < b₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) : b₁ ≤ b₂
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ • b < a₂ • b` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ < a₂) : a₁ • b < a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) : a₁ < a₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b → a₁ ≤ a₂` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) : a₁ ≤ a₂
end Right
end Defs
variable {α β} {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β}
section Mul
variable [Zero α] [Mul α] [Preorder α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulMono.toPosSMulMono [PosMulMono α] : PosSMulMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosMulStrictMono α] :
PosSMulStrictMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosMulReflectLT α] :
PosSMulReflectLT α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosMulReflectLE α] :
PosSMulReflectLE α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosMono.toSMulPosMono [MulPosMono α] : SMulPosMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosStrictMono [MulPosStrictMono α] :
SMulPosStrictMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLT [MulPosReflectLT α] :
SMulPosReflectLT α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLE [MulPosReflectLE α] :
SMulPosReflectLE α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_right h hb
end Mul
section SMul
variable [SMul α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
lemma monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone ((a • ·) : β → β) :=
PosSMulMono.elim ha
lemma strictMono_smul_left_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
StrictMono ((a • ·) : β → β) := PosSMulStrictMono.elim ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left [PosSMulMono α β] (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ := monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (hb : b₁ < b₂) (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ := strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha hb
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b₁ < a • b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b₁ < b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLT.elim ha h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (h : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) (ha : 0 < a) : b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLE.elim ha h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left := le_of_smul_le_smul_left
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha, fun h ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha.le, fun hb ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha⟩
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) : Monotone ((· • b) : α → β) :=
SMulPosMono.elim hb
lemma strictMono_smul_right_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
StrictMono ((· • b) : α → β) := SMulPosStrictMono.elim hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b := monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg hb ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b := strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb ha
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ < a₂ := SMulPosReflectLT.elim hb h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (h : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ := SMulPosReflectLE.elim hb h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_right := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right := le_of_smul_le_smul_right
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_right h hb, fun ha ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b ↔ a₁ < a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb.le, fun ha ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb⟩
end Right
section LeftRight
variable [Zero α] [Zero β]
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
end LeftRight
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulReflectLE α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).le_iff_le.1
lemma PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulReflectLE α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_le.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulStrictMono_iff_PosSMulReflectLE : PosSMulStrictMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono⟩
instance PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).reflect_lt
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulMono_iff_posSMulReflectLT : PosSMulMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono⟩
lemma smul_max_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • max b₁ b₂ = max (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_max
lemma smul_min_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • min b₁ b₂ = min (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_min
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosReflectLE α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_le.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h hb
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosReflectLE α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_lt.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_lt <| smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_le.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_le <| smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma smulPosStrictMono_iff_SMulPosReflectLE : SMulPosStrictMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono⟩
lemma smulPosMono_iff_smulPosReflectLT : SMulPosMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono⟩
end Right
end LinearOrder
end SMul
section SMulZeroClass
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
lemma smul_neg_of_pos_of_neg [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₁ := 0) (b₂ := b)
lemma smul_neg_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b < 0 ↔ b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₂ := (0 : β))
lemma smul_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 < b :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
end Preorder
end SMulZeroClass
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulWithZero α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos' [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma smul_neg_of_neg_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < a := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb (a₁ := 0) (a₂ := a)
lemma smul_nonneg' [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma pos_iff_pos_of_smul_pos [PosSMulReflectLT α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
0 < a ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨pos_of_smul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt, pos_of_smul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β]
/-- A constructor for `PosSMulMono` requiring you to prove `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` only when
`0 < a` -/
lemma PosSMulMono.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ a : α, 0 < a → ∀ b₁ b₂ : β, b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) :
PosSMulMono α β where
elim a ha b₁ b₂ h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha]
· exact h₀ _ ha _ _ h
/-- A constructor for `PosSMulReflectLT` requiring you to prove `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` only
when `0 < a` -/
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ a : α, 0 < a → ∀ b₁ b₂ : β, a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂) :
PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim a ha b₁ b₂ h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha] at h
· exact h₀ _ ha _ _ h
end PartialOrder
section PartialOrder
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β]
/-- A constructor for `SMulPosMono` requiring you to prove `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` only when
`0 < b` -/
lemma SMulPosMono.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ b : β, 0 < b → ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) :
SMulPosMono α β where
elim b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
obtain hb | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp [← hb]
· exact h₀ _ hb _ _ h
/-- A constructor for `SMulPosReflectLT` requiring you to prove `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` only
when `0 < b` -/
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ b : β, 0 < b → ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂) :
SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
obtain hb | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp [← hb] at h
· exact h₀ _ hb _ _ h
end PartialOrder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulMono α β :=
PosSMulMono.of_pos fun _a ha ↦ (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).monotone
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosMono α β :=
SMulPosMono.of_pos fun _b hb ↦ (strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb).monotone
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulReflectLE α β] :
PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos fun a ha b₁ b₂ h ↦
(le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left h.le ha).lt_of_ne <| by rintro rfl; simp at h
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosReflectLE α β] :
SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos fun b hb a₁ a₂ h ↦
(le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h.le hb).lt_of_ne <| by rintro rfl; simp at h
lemma smul_eq_smul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β]
(ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) :
a₁ • b₁ = a₂ • b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁.le).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
· exact (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂.le)
lemma smul_eq_smul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β]
(ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) :
a₁ • b₁ = a₂ • b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂.le)
· exact (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁.le).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
lemma pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_smul_pos [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
obtain ha | rfl | ha := lt_trichotomy a 0
· refine Or.inr ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb ↦ ?_) hab⟩
exact smul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha.le hb
· rw [zero_smul] at hab
exact hab.false.elim
· refine Or.inl ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb ↦ ?_) hab⟩
exact smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ha.le hb
lemma neg_of_smul_pos_right [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : a ≤ 0) :
b < 0 := ((pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_smul_pos h).resolve_left fun h ↦ h.1.not_le ha).2
lemma neg_of_smul_pos_left [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : b ≤ 0) :
a < 0 := ((pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_smul_pos h).resolve_left fun h ↦ h.2.not_le ha).1
lemma neg_iff_neg_of_smul_pos [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
a < 0 ↔ b < 0 :=
⟨neg_of_smul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt, neg_of_smul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_left' [SMulPosMono α β] (h : a • b < 0) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hb ↦ (smul_nonneg' ha hb).not_lt h
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_right' [PosSMulMono α β] (h : a • b < 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_not_ge fun ha ↦ (smul_nonneg ha hb).not_lt h
end LinearOrder
end SMulWithZero
section MulAction
variable [Monoid α] [Zero β] [MulAction α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
lemma le_smul_iff_one_le_left [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
b ≤ a • b ↔ 1 ≤ a := Iff.trans (by rw [one_smul]) (smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb)
@[simp]
lemma lt_smul_iff_one_lt_left [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
b < a • b ↔ 1 < a := Iff.trans (by rw [one_smul]) (smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb)
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_iff_le_one_left [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a • b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1 := Iff.trans (by rw [one_smul]) (smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb)
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_iff_lt_one_left [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a • b < b ↔ a < 1 := Iff.trans (by rw [one_smul]) (smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb)
lemma smul_le_of_le_one_left [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ 1) : a • b ≤ b := by
simpa only [one_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right h hb
lemma le_smul_of_one_le_left [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : 1 ≤ a) : b ≤ a • b := by
simpa only [one_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right h hb
lemma smul_lt_of_lt_one_left [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) (h : a < 1) : a • b < b := by
simpa only [one_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right h hb
lemma lt_smul_of_one_lt_left [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) (h : 1 < a) : b < a • b := by
simpa only [one_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right h hb
end Preorder
end MulAction
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [AddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β]
section PartialOrder
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β]
lemma PosSMulMono.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α β :=
⟨fun _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb ↦ (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb.le ha.le).lt_of_ne <|
(smul_right_injective _ ha.ne').ne hb.ne⟩
instance PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h ↦ h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ (smul_right_injective _ ha.ne' h).le) fun h' ↦
(lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h' ha.le).le⟩
end PartialOrder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
lemma posSMulMono_iff_posSMulStrictMono : PosSMulMono α β ↔ PosSMulStrictMono α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ PosSMulMono.toPosSMulStrictMono, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
lemma PosSMulReflectLE_iff_posSMulReflectLT : PosSMulReflectLE α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLE⟩
end PartialOrder
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring α] [AddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β]
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
lemma SMulPosMono.toSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α β :=
⟨fun _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha ↦ (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha.le hb.le).lt_of_ne <|
(smul_left_injective _ hb.ne').ne ha.ne⟩
lemma smulPosMono_iff_smulPosStrictMono : SMulPosMono α β ↔ SMulPosStrictMono α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosMono.toSMulPosStrictMono, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h ↦ h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ (smul_left_injective _ hb.ne' h).le) fun h' ↦
(lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h' hb.le).le⟩
lemma SMulPosReflectLE_iff_smulPosReflectLT : SMulPosReflectLE α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLE⟩
end PartialOrder
end Ring
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [MulAction α β]
lemma inv_smul_le_iff_of_pos [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a⁻¹ • b₁ ≤ b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ a • b₂ := by rw [← smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha, smul_inv_smul₀ ha.ne']
lemma le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
b₁ ≤ a⁻¹ • b₂ ↔ a • b₁ ≤ b₂ := by rw [← smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha, smul_inv_smul₀ ha.ne']
lemma inv_smul_lt_iff_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a⁻¹ • b₁ < b₂ ↔ b₁ < a • b₂ := by rw [← smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha, smul_inv_smul₀ ha.ne']
lemma lt_inv_smul_iff_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
b₁ < a⁻¹ • b₂ ↔ a • b₁ < b₂ := by rw [← smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha, smul_inv_smul₀ ha.ne']
/-- Right scalar multiplication as an order isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def OrderIso.smulRight [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] {a : α} (ha : 0 < a) : β ≃o β where
toEquiv := Equiv.smulRight ha.ne'
map_rel_iff' := smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha
end GroupWithZero
namespace OrderDual
section Left
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [SMul α β] [Zero α]
instance instPosSMulMono [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulMono α βᵒᵈ where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (β := β) hb ha
instance instPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulStrictMono α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α βᵒᵈ where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left (β := β) hb ha
instance instPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulReflectLT α βᵒᵈ where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left (β := β) h ha
instance instPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulReflectLE α β] : PosSMulReflectLE α βᵒᵈ where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left (β := β) h ha
end Left
section Right
variable [Preorder α] [Monoid α] [AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[DistribMulAction α β]
instance instSMulPosMono [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosMono α βᵒᵈ where
elim _b hb a₁ a₂ ha := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg]
exact smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right (β := β) ha <| neg_nonneg.2 hb
instance instSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosStrictMono α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α βᵒᵈ where
elim _b hb a₁ a₂ ha := by
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg]
exact smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right (β := β) ha <| neg_pos.2 hb
instance instSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosReflectLT α βᵒᵈ where
elim _b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg] at h
exact lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (β := β) h <| neg_nonneg.2 hb
instance instSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosReflectLE α β] : SMulPosReflectLE α βᵒᵈ where
elim _b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg] at h
exact le_of_smul_le_smul_right (β := β) h <| neg_pos.2 hb
end Right
end OrderDual
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [ExistsAddOfLE α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β] [Module α β]
section PosSMulMono
variable [PosSMulMono α β] {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β}
/-- Binary **rearrangement inequality**. -/
lemma smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
a₁ • b₂ + a₂ • b₁ ≤ a₁ • b₁ + a₂ • b₂ := by
obtain ⟨a, ha₀, rfl⟩ := exists_nonneg_add_of_le ha
rw [add_smul, add_smul, add_left_comm]
gcongr
/-- Binary **rearrangement inequality**. -/
lemma smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₂ ≤ b₁) :
a₁ • b₂ + a₂ • b₁ ≤ a₁ • b₁ + a₂ • b₂ := by
simp_rw [add_comm (a₁ • _)]; exact smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul ha hb
end PosSMulMono
section PosSMulStrictMono
variable [PosSMulStrictMono α β] {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β}
/-- Binary strict **rearrangement inequality**. -/
lemma smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
a₁ • b₂ + a₂ • b₁ < a₁ • b₁ + a₂ • b₂ := by
obtain ⟨a, ha₀, rfl⟩ := lt_iff_exists_pos_add.1 ha
rw [add_smul, add_smul, add_left_comm]
gcongr
/-- Binary strict **rearrangement inequality**. -/
lemma smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul' (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₂ < b₁) :
a₁ • b₂ + a₂ • b₁ < a₁ • b₁ + a₂ • b₂ := by
simp_rw [add_comm (a₁ • _)]; exact smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul ha hb
|
end PosSMulStrictMono
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Module/Defs.lean | 833 | 835 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# Theory of topological modules
We use the class `ContinuousSMul` for topological (semi) modules and topological vector spaces.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u v w u'
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem ContinuousSMul.of_nhds_zero [IsTopologicalRing R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
(hmul : Tendsto (fun p : R × M => p.1 • p.2) (𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulleft : ∀ m : M, Tendsto (fun a : R => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulright : ∀ a : R, Tendsto (fun m : M => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)) : ContinuousSMul R M where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← nhds_prod_eq] at hmul
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂ (AddMonoidHom.smul : R →+ M →+ M) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simpa [ContinuousAt]
variable (R M) in
omit [TopologicalSpace R] in
/-- A topological module over a ring has continuous negation.
This cannot be an instance, because it would cause search for `[Module ?R M]` with unknown `R`. -/
theorem ContinuousNeg.of_continuousConstSMul [ContinuousConstSMul R M] : ContinuousNeg M where
continuous_neg := by simpa using continuous_const_smul (T := M) (-1 : R)
end
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [ContinuousAdd M] [Module R M] [ContinuousSMul R M]
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nontrivially normed field. -/
theorem Submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [NeBot (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0)]
(s : Submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s : Set M)).Nonempty) : s = ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine Submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => ?_
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy
have : Tendsto (fun c : R => y + c • x) (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0) (𝓝 (y + (0 : R) • x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul tendsto_const_nhds)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this
obtain ⟨_, hu : y + _ • _ ∈ s, u, rfl⟩ :=
nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem (Filter.mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhdsWithin)
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_mem_nhds hy
rwa [s.add_mem_iff_right hy', ← Units.smul_def, s.smul_mem_iff' u] at hu
variable (R M)
/-- Let `R` be a topological ring such that zero is not an isolated point (e.g., a nontrivially
normed field, see `NormedField.punctured_nhds_neBot`). Let `M` be a nontrivial module over `R`
such that `c • x = 0` implies `c = 0 ∨ x = 0`. Then `M` has no isolated points. We formulate this
using `NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)`.
This lemma is not an instance because Lean would need to find `[ContinuousSMul ?m_1 M]` with
unknown `?m_1`. We register this as an instance for `R = ℝ` in `Real.punctured_nhds_module_neBot`.
One can also use `haveI := Module.punctured_nhds_neBot R M` in a proof.
-/
theorem Module.punctured_nhds_neBot [Nontrivial M] [NeBot (𝓝[≠] (0 : R))] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(x : M) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨y, hy⟩
suffices Tendsto (fun c : R => x + c • y) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[≠] x) from this.neBot
refine Tendsto.inf ?_ (tendsto_principal_principal.2 <| ?_)
· convert tendsto_const_nhds.add ((@tendsto_id R _).smul_const y)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
· intro c hc
simpa [hy] using hc
end
section LatticeOps
variable {R M₁ M₂ : Type*} [SMul R M₁] [SMul R M₂] [u : TopologicalSpace R]
{t : TopologicalSpace M₂} [ContinuousSMul R M₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M₁ M₂] [MulActionHomClass F R M₁ M₂] (f : F)
theorem continuousSMul_induced : @ContinuousSMul R M₁ _ u (t.induced f) :=
let _ : TopologicalSpace M₁ := t.induced f
IsInducing.continuousSMul ⟨rfl⟩ continuous_id (map_smul f _ _)
end LatticeOps
/-- The span of a separable subset with respect to a separable scalar ring is again separable. -/
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.span {R M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace R] [SeparableSpace R]
[ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousSMul R M] {s : Set M} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
IsSeparable (Submodule.span R s : Set M) := by
rw [Submodule.span_eq_iUnion_nat]
refine .iUnion fun n ↦ .image ?_ ?_
· have : IsSeparable {f : Fin n → R × M | ∀ (i : Fin n), f i ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ s} := by
apply isSeparable_pi (fun i ↦ .prod (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hs)
rwa [Set.univ_prod] at this
· apply continuous_finset_sum _ (fun i _ ↦ ?_)
exact (continuous_fst.comp (continuous_apply i)).smul (continuous_snd.comp (continuous_apply i))
namespace Submodule
instance topologicalAddGroup {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] (S : Submodule R M) : IsTopologicalAddGroup S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsTopologicalAddGroup S.toAddSubgroup)
end Submodule
section closure
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[ContinuousConstSMul R M]
theorem Submodule.mapsTo_smul_closure (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (closure s : Set M) (closure s) :=
have : Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (s : Set M) s := fun _ h ↦ s.smul_mem c h
this.closure (continuous_const_smul c)
theorem Submodule.smul_closure_subset (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
c • closure (s : Set M) ⊆ closure (s : Set M) :=
(s.mapsTo_smul_closure c).image_subset
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a submodule of a topological `R`-module `M` is itself
a submodule. -/
def Submodule.topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M :=
{ s.toAddSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
smul_mem' := s.mapsTo_smul_closure }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe (s : Submodule R M) :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set M) = closure (s : Set M) :=
rfl
theorem Submodule.le_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
subset_closure
theorem Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span (s : Set M) :
closure s ⊆ (span R s).topologicalClosure := by
rw [Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
exact closure_mono subset_span
theorem Submodule.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set M) := isClosed_closure
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Submodule R M) {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set M)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono {s : Submodule R M} {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t) :
s.topologicalClosure ≤ t.topologicalClosure :=
closure_mono h
/-- The topological closure of a closed submodule `s` is equal to `s`. -/
theorem IsClosed.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq {s : Submodule R M} (hs : IsClosed (s : Set M)) :
s.topologicalClosure = s :=
SetLike.ext' hs.closure_eq
/-- A subspace is dense iff its topological closure is the entire space. -/
theorem Submodule.dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top {s : Submodule R M} :
Dense (s : Set M) ↔ s.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq, dense_iff_closure_eq]
simp
instance Submodule.topologicalClosure.completeSpace {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
[UniformSpace M'] [ContinuousAdd M'] [ContinuousConstSMul R M'] [CompleteSpace M']
(U : Submodule R M') : CompleteSpace U.topologicalClosure :=
isClosed_closure.completeSpace_coe
/-- A maximal proper subspace of a topological module (i.e a `Submodule` satisfying `IsCoatom`)
is either closed or dense. -/
theorem Submodule.isClosed_or_dense_of_isCoatom (s : Submodule R M) (hs : IsCoatom s) :
IsClosed (s : Set M) ∨ Dense (s : Set M) := by
refine (hs.le_iff.mp s.le_topologicalClosure).symm.imp ?_ dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top.mpr
exact fun h ↦ h ▸ isClosed_closure
end closure
namespace Submodule
variable {ι R : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well. -/
theorem closure_coe_iSup_map_single (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
closure (↑(⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) : Set (∀ i, M i)) =
Set.univ.pi fun i ↦ closure (s i) := by
rw [← closure_pi_set]
refine (closure_mono ?_).antisymm <| closure_minimal ?_ isClosed_closure
· exact SetLike.coe_mono <| iSup_map_single_le
· simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_closure_iff]
intro x hx U hU hxU
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.mp hU x hxU with ⟨t, V, hV, hVU⟩
refine ⟨∑ i ∈ t, Pi.single i (x i), hVU ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_all [Finset.sum_pi_single]
· exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| mem_map_of_mem <| hx _ <| Set.mem_univ _
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well.
This version is stated in terms of `Submodule.topologicalClosure`,
thus assumes that `M i`s are topological modules over `R`.
However, the statement is true without assuming continuity of the operations,
see `Submodule.closure_coe_iSup_map_single` above. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_iSup_map_single [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R (M i)] (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
topologicalClosure (⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) =
pi Set.univ fun i ↦ (s i).topologicalClosure :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| closure_coe_iSup_map_single _
end Submodule
section Pi
theorem LinearMap.continuous_on_pi {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Finite ι] [Semiring R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousAdd M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) : Continuous f := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
-- for the proof, write `f` in the standard basis, and use that each coordinate is a continuous
-- function.
have : (f : (ι → R) → M) = fun x => ∑ i : ι, x i • f fun j => if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
ext x
exact f.pi_apply_eq_sum_univ x
rw [this]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
exact (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const
end Pi
section PointwiseLimits
variable {M₁ M₂ α R S : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M₂] [T2Space M₂] [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module S M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul S M₂]
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] {σ : R →+* S} {l : Filter α}
/-- Constructs a bundled linear map from a function and a proof that this function belongs to the
closure of the set of linear maps. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe (f : M₁ → M₂)
(hf : f ∈ closure (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂))) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
{ addMonoidHomOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf with
map_smul' := (isClosed_setOf_map_smul M₁ M₂ σ).closure_subset_iff.2
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ) hf }
/-- Construct a bundled linear map from a pointwise limit of linear maps -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfTendsto (f : M₁ → M₂) (g : α → M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) [l.NeBot]
(h : Tendsto (fun a x => g a x) l (𝓝 f)) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f <|
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_range_self _
variable (M₁ M₂ σ)
theorem LinearMap.isClosed_range_coe : IsClosed (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂)) :=
isClosed_of_closure_subset fun f hf => ⟨linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf, rfl⟩
end PointwiseLimits
section Quotient
namespace Submodule
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M]
(S : Submodule R M)
instance _root_.QuotientModule.Quotient.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.quotientRel))
theorem isOpenMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenMap_coe
theorem isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenQuotientMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk
instance topologicalAddGroup_quotient [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] : IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S.toAddSubgroup)
instance continuousSMul_quotient [TopologicalSpace R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] : ContinuousSMul R (M ⧸ S) where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← (IsOpenQuotientMap.id.prodMap S.isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ).continuous_comp_iff]
exact continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_smul
instance t3_quotient_of_isClosed [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] [IsClosed (S : Set M)] :
T3Space (M ⧸ S) :=
letI : IsClosed (S.toAddSubgroup : Set M) := ‹_›
QuotientAddGroup.instT3Space S.toAddSubgroup
end Submodule
end Quotient
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Basic.lean | 1,660 | 1,663 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Kernels and cokernels
In a category with zero morphisms, the kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is
the equalizer of `f` and `0 : X ⟶ Y`. (Similarly the cokernel is the coequalizer.)
The basic definitions are
* `kernel : (X ⟶ Y) → C`
* `kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X`
* `kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0` and
* `kernel.lift (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f` (as well as the dual versions)
## Main statements
Besides the definition and lifts, we prove
* `kernel.ιZeroIsIso`: a kernel map of a zero morphism is an isomorphism
* `kernel.eq_zero_of_epi_kernel`: if `kernel.ι f` is an epimorphism, then `f = 0`
* `kernel.ofMono`: the kernel of a monomorphism is the zero object
* `kernel.liftMono`: the lift of a monomorphism `k : W ⟶ X` such that `k ≫ f = 0`
is still a monomorphism
* `kernel.isLimitConeZeroCone`: if our category has a zero object, then the map from the zero
object is a kernel map of any monomorphism
* `kernel.ιOfZero`: `kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)` is an isomorphism
and the corresponding dual statements.
## Future work
* TODO: connect this with existing work in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe v v₂ u u' u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- A morphism `f` has a kernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a limit. -/
abbrev HasKernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasLimit (parallelPair f 0)
/-- A morphism `f` has a cokernel if the functor `ParallelPair f 0` has a colimit. -/
abbrev HasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
HasColimit (parallelPair f 0)
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
section
/-- A kernel fork is just a fork where the second morphism is a zero morphism. -/
abbrev KernelFork :=
Fork f 0
variable {f}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem KernelFork.condition (s : KernelFork f) : Fork.ι s ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [Fork.condition, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem KernelFork.app_one (s : KernelFork f) : s.π.app one = 0 := by
simp [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
/-- A morphism `ι` satisfying `ι ≫ f = 0` determines a kernel fork over `f`. -/
abbrev KernelFork.ofι {Z : C} (ι : Z ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) : KernelFork f :=
Fork.ofι ι <| by rw [w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
@[simp]
theorem KernelFork.ι_ofι {X Y P : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = 0) :
Fork.ι (KernelFork.ofι ι w) = ι := rfl
section
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy nor case_bash
/-- Every kernel fork `s` is isomorphic (actually, equal) to `fork.ofι (fork.ι s) _`. -/
def isoOfι (s : Fork f 0) : s ≅ Fork.ofι (Fork.ι s) (Fork.condition s) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by rintro ⟨j⟩ <;> simp
/-- If `ι = ι'`, then `fork.ofι ι _` and `fork.ofι ι' _` are isomorphic. -/
def ofιCongr {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} {w : ι ≫ f = 0} (h : ι = ι') :
KernelFork.ofι ι w ≅ KernelFork.ofι ι' (by rw [← h, w]) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
/-- If `F` is an equivalence, then applying `F` to a diagram indexing a (co)kernel of `f` yields
the diagram indexing the (co)kernel of `F.map f`. -/
def compNatIso {D : Type u'} [Category.{v} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (F : C ⥤ D) [F.IsEquivalence] :
parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F ≅ parallelPair (F.map f) 0 :=
let app (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair f 0 ⋙ F).obj j ≅ (parallelPair (F.map f) 0).obj j :=
match j with
| zero => Iso.refl _
| one => Iso.refl _
NatIso.ofComponents app <| by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ <;> intro g <;> cases g <;> simp [app]
end
/-- If `s` is a limit kernel fork and `k : W ⟶ X` satisfies `k ≫ f = 0`, then there is some
`l : W ⟶ s.X` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' {s : KernelFork f} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨hs.lift <| KernelFork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a kernel fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : KernelFork f) (lift : ∀ s : KernelFork f, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : KernelFork f, lift s ≫ t.ι = s.ι)
(uniq : ∀ (s : KernelFork f) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
· exact fac s
· simp
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w Limits.WalkingParallelPair.zero) }
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` constructed using
`KernelFork.ofι` is a limit cone.
-/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) (eq : g ≫ f = 0)
(lift : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (_ : g' ≫ f = 0), W' ⟶ W)
(fac : ∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0), lift g' eq' ≫ g = g')
(uniq :
∀ {W' : C} (g' : W' ⟶ X) (eq' : g' ≫ f = 0) (m : W' ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ g = g'), m = lift g' eq') :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι g eq) :=
isLimitAux _ (fun s => lift s.ι s.condition) (fun s => fac s.ι s.condition) fun s =>
uniq s.ι s.condition
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `KernelFork` of the form
`KernelFork.ofι i _` is a limit cone when we know that `i` is a monomorphism. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι' {X Y K : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (i : K ⟶ X) (w : i ≫ f = 0)
(h : ∀ {A : C} (k : A ⟶ X) (_ : k ≫ f = 0), { l : A ⟶ K // l ≫ i = k}) [hi : Mono i] :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i w) :=
ofι _ _ (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).1) (fun {_} k hk => (h k hk).2) (fun {A} k hk m hm => by
rw [← cancel_mono i, (h k hk).2, hm])
/-- Every kernel of `f` induces a kernel of `f ≫ g` if `g` is mono. -/
def isKernelCompMono {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g] {h : X ⟶ Z}
(hh : h = f ≫ g) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι (by simp [hh]) : KernelFork h) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
let s' : KernelFork f := Fork.ofι s.ι (by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp [← hh, s.condition])
let l := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' i s'.ι s'.condition
⟨l.1, l.2, fun hm => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm; rw [hm]; exact l.2.symm⟩
theorem isKernelCompMono_lift {c : KernelFork f} (i : IsLimit c) {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : Mono g]
{h : X ⟶ Z} (hh : h = f ≫ g) (s : KernelFork h) :
(isKernelCompMono i g hh).lift s = i.lift (Fork.ofι s.ι (by
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, ← hh]
simp)) := rfl
/-- Every kernel of `f ≫ g` is also a kernel of `f`, as long as `c.ι ≫ f` vanishes. -/
def isKernelOfComp {W : C} (g : Y ⟶ W) (h : X ⟶ W) {c : KernelFork h} (i : IsLimit c)
(hf : c.ι ≫ f = 0) (hfg : f ≫ g = h) : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι c.ι hf) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => i.lift (KernelFork.ofι s.ι (by simp [← hfg])))
(fun s => by simp only [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι]) fun s m h => by
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext i; simpa using h
/-- `X` identifies to the kernel of a zero map `X ⟶ Y`. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : f = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (𝟙 X) (show 𝟙 X ≫ f = 0 by rw [hf, comp_zero])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun x _ => x) (fun _ _ => Category.comp_id _)
(fun _ _ _ hb => by simp only [← hb, Category.comp_id])
/-- Any zero object identifies to the kernel of a given monomorphisms. -/
def KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hf : Mono f) (h : IsZero c.pt) : IsLimit c :=
isLimitAux _ (fun _ => 0) (fun s => by rw [zero_comp, ← cancel_mono f, zero_comp, s.condition])
(fun _ _ _ => h.eq_of_tgt _ _)
lemma KernelFork.IsLimit.isIso_ι {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(hc : IsLimit c) (hf : f = 0) : IsIso c.ι := by
let e : c.pt ≅ X := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId (f : X ⟶ Y) hf)
have eq : e.inv ≫ c.ι = 𝟙 X := Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hc
haveI : IsIso (e.inv ≫ c.ι) := by
rw [eq]
infer_instance
exact IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left e.inv c.ι
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, `e : X ≅ X'` and `g' : X' ⟶ Y` is a morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{X' Y' : C} (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (e : X ≅ X')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ e.hom ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') (c.ι ≫ e.hom) (by simp [← iff])) :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun s hs ↦ hc.lift (KernelFork.ofι (ι := s ≫ e.inv)
(by rw [iff, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, hs])))
(fun s hs ↦ by simp [← cancel_mono e.inv])
(fun s hs m hm ↦ Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by simpa [← cancel_mono e.hom] using hm))
/-- If `c` is a limit kernel fork for `g : X ⟶ Y`, and `g' : X ⟶ Y'` is a another morphism,
then there is a limit kernel fork for `g'` with the same point as `c` if for any
morphism `φ : W ⟶ X`, there is an equivalence `φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0`. -/
def KernelFork.isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff' {X Y : C} {g : X ⟶ Y} {c : KernelFork g} (hc : IsLimit c)
{Y' : C} (g' : X ⟶ Y')
(iff : ∀ ⦃W : C⦄ (φ : W ⟶ X), φ ≫ g = 0 ↔ φ ≫ g' = 0) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (f := g') c.ι (by simp [← iff])) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (isLimitOfIsLimitOfIff hc g' (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using iff))
(Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
end
namespace KernelFork
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
/-- The morphism between points of kernel forks induced by a morphism
in the category of arrows. -/
def mapOfIsLimit (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ⟶ kf'.pt :=
hf'.lift (KernelFork.ofι (kf.ι ≫ φ.left) (by simp))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapOfIsLimit_ι (kf : KernelFork f) {kf' : KernelFork f'} (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ ≫ kf'.ι = kf.ι ≫ φ.left :=
hf'.fac _ _
/-- The isomorphism between points of limit kernel forks induced by an isomorphism
in the category of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def mapIsoOfIsLimit {kf : KernelFork f} {kf' : KernelFork f'}
(hf : IsLimit kf) (hf' : IsLimit kf')
(φ : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') : kf.pt ≅ kf'.pt where
hom := kf.mapOfIsLimit hf' φ.hom
inv := kf'.mapOfIsLimit hf φ.inv
hom_inv_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf (by simp)
inv_hom_id := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hf' (by simp)
end KernelFork
section
variable [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism, expressed as the equalizer with the 0 morphism. -/
abbrev kernel (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] : C :=
equalizer f 0
/-- The map from `kernel f` into the source of `f`. -/
abbrev kernel.ι : kernel f ⟶ X :=
equalizer.ι f 0
@[simp]
theorem equalizer_as_kernel : equalizer.ι f 0 = kernel.ι f := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.condition : kernel.ι f ≫ f = 0 :=
KernelFork.condition _
/-- The kernel built from `kernel.ι f` is limiting. -/
def kernelIsKernel : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (kernel.ι f) ((kernel.condition f).trans comp_zero.symm)) :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (limit.isLimit _) (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
/-- Given any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0`, `k` factors through `kernel.ι f`
via `kernel.lift : W ⟶ kernel f`. -/
abbrev kernel.lift {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernel f :=
(kernelIsKernel f).lift (KernelFork.ofι k h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernel.lift_ι {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : kernel.lift f k h ≫ kernel.ι f = k :=
(kernelIsKernel f).fac (KernelFork.ofι k h) WalkingParallelPair.zero
@[simp]
theorem kernel.lift_zero {W : C} {h} : kernel.lift f (0 : W ⟶ X) h = 0 := by
ext; simp
instance kernel.lift_mono {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) [Mono k] : Mono (kernel.lift f k h) :=
⟨fun {Z} g g' w => by
replace w := w =≫ kernel.ι f
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.lift_ι] at w
exact (cancel_mono k).1 w⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying `k ≫ f = 0` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ kernel f` such that
`l ≫ kernel.ι f = k`. -/
def kernel.lift' {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = 0) : { l : W ⟶ kernel f // l ≫ kernel.ι f = k } :=
⟨kernel.lift f k h, kernel.lift_ι _ _ _⟩
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism of kernels. -/
abbrev kernel.map {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(w : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') : kernel f ⟶ kernel f' :=
kernel.lift f' (kernel.ι f ≫ p) (by simp [← w])
/-- Given a commutative diagram
X --f--> Y --g--> Z
| | |
| | |
v v v
X' -f'-> Y' -g'-> Z'
with horizontal arrows composing to zero,
then we obtain a commutative square
X ---> kernel g
| |
| | kernel.map
| |
v v
X' --> kernel g'
-/
theorem kernel.lift_map {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(f' : X' ⟶ Y') (g' : Y' ⟶ Z') [HasKernel g'] (w' : f' ≫ g' = 0) (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(r : Z ⟶ Z') (h₁ : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (h₂ : g ≫ r = q ≫ g') :
kernel.lift g f w ≫ kernel.map g g' q r h₂ = p ≫ kernel.lift g' f' w' := by
ext; simp [h₁]
/-- A commuting square of isomorphisms induces an isomorphism of kernels. -/
@[simps]
def kernel.mapIso {X' Y' : C} (f' : X' ⟶ Y') [HasKernel f'] (p : X ≅ X') (q : Y ≅ Y')
(w : f ≫ q.hom = p.hom ≫ f') : kernel f ≅ kernel f' where
hom := kernel.map f f' p.hom q.hom w
inv :=
kernel.map f' f p.inv q.inv
(by
refine (cancel_mono q.hom).1 ?_
simp [w])
/-- Every kernel of the zero morphism is an isomorphism -/
instance kernel.ι_zero_isIso : IsIso (kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y)) :=
equalizer.ι_of_self _
theorem eq_zero_of_epi_kernel [Epi (kernel.ι f)] : f = 0 :=
(cancel_epi (kernel.ι f)).1 (by simp)
/-- The kernel of a zero morphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def kernelZeroIsoSource : kernel (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≅ X :=
equalizer.isoSourceOfSelf 0
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_hom : kernelZeroIsoSource.hom = kernel.ι (0 : X ⟶ Y) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem kernelZeroIsoSource_inv :
kernelZeroIsoSource.inv = kernel.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) (𝟙 X) (by simp) := by
ext
simp [kernelZeroIsoSource]
/-- If two morphisms are known to be equal, then their kernels are isomorphic. -/
def kernelIsoOfEq {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) : kernel f ≅ kernel g :=
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_refl {h : f = f} : kernelIsoOfEq h = Iso.refl (kernel f) := by
ext
simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
/- Porting note: induction on Eq is trying instantiate another g... -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_hom_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ kernel.ι g = kernel.ι f := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_inv_comp_ι {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g) :
(kernelIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ kernel.ι _ = kernel.ι _ := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_hom {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).hom = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [← h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_kernelIsoOfEq_inv {Z} {f g : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] (h : f = g)
(e : Z ⟶ X) (he) :
kernel.lift _ e he ≫ (kernelIsoOfEq h).inv = kernel.lift _ e (by simp [h, he]) := by
cases h; simp
@[simp]
theorem kernelIsoOfEq_trans {f g h : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f] [HasKernel g] [HasKernel h] (w₁ : f = g)
(w₂ : g = h) : kernelIsoOfEq w₁ ≪≫ kernelIsoOfEq w₂ = kernelIsoOfEq (w₁.trans w₂) := by
cases w₁; cases w₂; ext; simp [kernelIsoOfEq]
variable {f}
theorem kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : ¬Epi (kernel.ι f) := fun _ =>
w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
theorem kernel_not_iso_of_nonzero (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso (kernel.ι f) → False := fun _ =>
kernel_not_epi_of_nonzero w inferInstance
instance hasKernel_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] :
| HasKernel (f ≫ g) :=
⟨⟨{ cone := _
isLimit := isKernelCompMono (limit.isLimit _) g rfl }⟩⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 407 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Alexander Bentkamp, Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Sébastien Gouëzel, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Cardinality
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Complex number as a finite dimensional vector space over `ℝ`
This file contains the `FiniteDimensional ℝ ℂ` instance, as well as some results about the rank
(`finrank` and `Module.rank`).
-/
open Module
namespace Complex
instance : FiniteDimensional ℝ ℂ := .of_fintype_basis basisOneI
/-- `ℂ` is a finite extension of `ℝ` of degree 2, i.e `[ℂ : ℝ] = 2` -/
@[simp, stacks 09G4]
theorem finrank_real_complex : finrank ℝ ℂ = 2 := by
rw [finrank_eq_card_basis basisOneI, Fintype.card_fin]
@[simp]
theorem rank_real_complex : Module.rank ℝ ℂ = 2 := by simp [← finrank_eq_rank, finrank_real_complex]
theorem rank_real_complex'.{u} : Cardinal.lift.{u} (Module.rank ℝ ℂ) = 2 := by
rw [← finrank_eq_rank, finrank_real_complex, Cardinal.lift_natCast, Nat.cast_ofNat]
/-- `Fact` version of the dimension of `ℂ` over `ℝ`, locally useful in the definition of the
circle. -/
theorem finrank_real_complex_fact : Fact (finrank ℝ ℂ = 2) :=
⟨finrank_real_complex⟩
end Complex
instance (priority := 100) FiniteDimensional.complexToReal (E : Type*) [AddCommGroup E]
[Module ℂ E] [FiniteDimensional ℂ E] : FiniteDimensional ℝ E :=
FiniteDimensional.trans ℝ ℂ E
theorem rank_real_of_complex (E : Type*) [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℂ E] :
Module.rank ℝ E = 2 * Module.rank ℂ E :=
Cardinal.lift_inj.{_,0}.1 <| by
rw [← lift_rank_mul_lift_rank ℝ ℂ E, Complex.rank_real_complex']
simp only [Cardinal.lift_id']
theorem finrank_real_of_complex (E : Type*) [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℂ E] :
Module.finrank ℝ E = 2 * Module.finrank ℂ E := by
rw [← Module.finrank_mul_finrank ℝ ℂ E, Complex.finrank_real_complex]
section Rational
open Cardinal Module
@[simp]
lemma Real.rank_rat_real : Module.rank ℚ ℝ = continuum := by
refine (Free.rank_eq_mk_of_infinite_lt ℚ ℝ ?_).trans mk_real
simpa [mk_real] using aleph0_lt_continuum
/-- `C` has an uncountable basis over `ℚ`. -/
@[simp, stacks 09G0]
lemma Complex.rank_rat_complex : Module.rank ℚ ℂ = continuum := by
refine (Free.rank_eq_mk_of_infinite_lt ℚ ℂ ?_).trans Cardinal.mk_complex
simpa using aleph0_lt_continuum
/-- `ℂ` and `ℝ` are isomorphic as vector spaces over `ℚ`, or equivalently,
as additive groups. -/
theorem Complex.nonempty_linearEquiv_real : Nonempty (ℂ ≃ₗ[ℚ] ℝ) :=
LinearEquiv.nonempty_equiv_iff_rank_eq.mpr <| by simp
end Rational
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/FiniteDimensional.lean | 80 | 81 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
theorem prodMap_image_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set α) (t : Set γ) :
(Prod.map f g) '' (s ×ˢ t) = (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' t) := by
ext
aesop
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_prod, singleton_prod]
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, prod_union, prod_singleton]
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
theorem mapsTo_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : MapsTo Prod.swap (s ×ˢ t) (t ×ˢ s) :=
fun _ ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨hy, hx⟩
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prodMap {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")] alias range_prod_map := range_prodMap
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prodMap]
apply range_comp_subset_range
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod := image_prodMk_subset_prod
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left := image_prodMk_subset_prod_left
theorem image_prodMk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-22")]
alias image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right := image_prodMk_subset_prod_right
theorem prod_subset_preimage_fst (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.fst ⁻¹' s :=
inter_subset_left
theorem fst_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_fst s t
theorem fst_image_prod (s : Set β) {t : Set α} (ht : t.Nonempty) : Prod.fst '' s ×ˢ t = s :=
(fst_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
⟨(y, x), ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_fst_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.fst (s ×ˢ t) s :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).1
theorem prod_subset_preimage_snd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : s ×ˢ t ⊆ Prod.snd ⁻¹' t :=
inter_subset_right
theorem snd_image_prod_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| prod_subset_preimage_snd s t
theorem snd_image_prod {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : Prod.snd '' s ×ˢ t = t :=
(snd_image_prod_subset _ _).antisymm fun y y_in =>
let ⟨x, x_in⟩ := hs
⟨(x, y), ⟨x_in, y_in⟩, rfl⟩
lemma mapsTo_snd_prod {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : MapsTo Prod.snd (s ×ˢ t) t :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_prod.1 hx).2
theorem prod_diff_prod : s ×ˢ t \ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ = s ×ˢ (t \ t₁) ∪ (s \ s₁) ×ˢ t := by
ext x
by_cases h₁ : x.1 ∈ s₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : x.2 ∈ t₁ <;> simp [*]
/-- A product set is included in a product set if and only factors are included, or a factor of the
first set is empty. -/
theorem prod_subset_prod_iff : s ×ˢ t ⊆ s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s ⊆ s₁ ∧ t ⊆ t₁ ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rcases (s ×ˢ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.1 h]
have st : s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by rwa [prod_nonempty_iff] at h
refine ⟨fun H => Or.inl ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have := image_subset (Prod.fst : α × β → α) H
rwa [fst_image_prod _ st.2, fst_image_prod _ (h.mono H).snd] at this
· have := image_subset (Prod.snd : α × β → β) H
rwa [snd_image_prod st.1, snd_image_prod (h.mono H).fst] at this
· intro H
simp only [st.1.ne_empty, st.2.ne_empty, or_false] at H
exact prod_mono H.1 H.2
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty (h : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty) :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ := by
constructor
· intro heq
have h₁ : (s₁ ×ˢ t₁ : Set _).Nonempty := by rwa [← heq]
rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at h h₁
rw [← fst_image_prod s h.2, ← fst_image_prod s₁ h₁.2, heq, eq_self_iff_true, true_and, ←
snd_image_prod h.1 t, ← snd_image_prod h₁.1 t₁, heq]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff :
s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ↔ s = s₁ ∧ t = t₁ ∨ (s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅) ∧ (s₁ = ∅ ∨ t₁ = ∅) := by
symm
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (s ×ˢ t) with h | h
· simp_rw [h, @eq_comm _ ∅, prod_eq_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h, true_and,
or_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h
rw [prod_eq_prod_iff_of_nonempty h]
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, prod_eq_empty_iff] at h
simp_rw [h, false_and, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_iff_eq (ht : t.Nonempty) : s ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ↔ s = s₁ := by
simp_rw [prod_eq_prod_iff, ht.ne_empty, and_true, or_iff_left_iff_imp, or_false]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem subset_prod {s : Set (α × β)} : s ⊆ (Prod.fst '' s) ×ˢ (Prod.snd '' s) :=
fun _ hp ↦ mem_prod.2 ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ hp, mem_image_of_mem _ hp⟩
section Mono
variable [Preorder α] {f : α → Set β} {g : α → Set γ}
theorem _root_.Monotone.set_prod (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.Antitone.set_prod (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x ×ˢ g x :=
fun _ _ h => prod_mono (hf h) (hg h)
theorem _root_.MonotoneOn.set_prod (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
theorem _root_.AntitoneOn.set_prod (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x ×ˢ g x) s := fun _ ha _ hb h => prod_mono (hf ha hb h) (hg ha hb h)
end Mono
end Prod
/-! ### Diagonal
In this section we prove some lemmas about the diagonal set `{p | p.1 = p.2}` and the diagonal map
`fun x ↦ (x, x)`.
-/
section Diagonal
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α}
lemma diagonal_nonempty [Nonempty α] : (diagonal α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun x => ⟨_, mem_diagonal x⟩
instance decidableMemDiagonal [h : DecidableEq α] (x : α × α) : Decidable (x ∈ diagonal α) :=
h x.1 x.2
theorem preimage_coe_coe_diagonal (s : Set α) :
Prod.map (fun x : s => (x : α)) (fun x : s => (x : α)) ⁻¹' diagonal α = diagonal s := by
ext ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
simp [Set.diagonal]
@[simp]
theorem range_diag : (range fun x => (x, x)) = diagonal α := by
| ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [diagonal, eq_comm]
theorem diagonal_subset_iff {s} : diagonal α ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, (x, x) ∈ s := by
rw [← range_diag, range_subset_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 425 | 429 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.GammaSpecAdjunction
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.InvSubmonoid
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Surjective
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.CommRingCat
/-!
# Affine schemes
We define the category of `AffineScheme`s as the essential image of `Spec`.
We also define predicates about affine schemes and affine open sets.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme`: The category of affine schemes.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffine`: A scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an
isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.isoSpec`: The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine
scheme.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme.equivCommRingCat`: The equivalence of categories
`AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ` given by `AffineScheme.Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme` and
`AffineScheme.Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen`: An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is
affine.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.fromSpec`: The immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Spec (structureSheaf)
/-- The category of affine schemes -/
def AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.EssImageSubcategory
deriving Category
/-- A Scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an isomorphism. -/
class IsAffine (X : Scheme) : Prop where
affine : IsIso X.toSpecΓ
attribute [instance] IsAffine.affine
instance (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] : IsIso (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X) := @IsAffine.affine X _
/-- The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine scheme. -/
@[simps! -isSimp hom]
def Scheme.isoSpec (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : X ≅ Spec Γ(X, ⊤) :=
asIso X.toSpecΓ
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_hom_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
X.isoSpec.hom ≫ Spec.map (f.appTop) = f ≫ Y.isoSpec.hom := by
simp only [isoSpec, asIso_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality]
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Spec.map (f.appTop) ≫ Y.isoSpec.inv = X.isoSpec.inv ≫ f := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, isoSpec, asIso_hom, ← Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc, isoSpec,
asIso_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.toSpecΓ ≫ X.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.isoSpec.inv ≫ X.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme and the information that it is affine.
Also see `AffineScheme.of` for a typeclass version. -/
@[simps]
def AffineScheme.mk (X : Scheme) (_ : IsAffine X) : AffineScheme :=
⟨X, ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme. Also see `AffineScheme.mk` for a non-typeclass
version. -/
def AffineScheme.of (X : Scheme) [h : IsAffine X] : AffineScheme :=
AffineScheme.mk X h
/-- Type check a morphism of schemes as a morphism in `AffineScheme`. -/
def AffineScheme.ofHom {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AffineScheme.of X ⟶ AffineScheme.of Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem essImage_Spec {X : Scheme} : Scheme.Spec.essImage X ↔ IsAffine X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso h⟩,
fun _ => ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")] alias mem_Spec_essImage := essImage_Spec
instance isAffine_affineScheme (X : AffineScheme.{u}) : IsAffine X.obj :=
⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso X.property⟩
instance (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) : IsAffine (Scheme.Spec.obj R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage R⟩
instance isAffine_Spec (R : CommRingCat) : IsAffine (Spec R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage (op R)⟩
theorem IsAffine.of_isIso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] [h : IsAffine Y] : IsAffine X := by
rw [← essImage_Spec] at h ⊢; exact Functor.essImage.ofIso (asIso f).symm h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-31")] alias isAffine_of_isIso := IsAffine.of_isIso
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is a morphism between affine schemes, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism on prime spectra induced by the map on global sections. -/
noncomputable
def arrowIsoSpecΓOfIsAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk (Spec.map f.appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk X.isoSpec Y.isoSpec (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit_naturality _)
/-- If `f : A ⟶ B` is a ring homomorphism, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism induced on global sections by the map on prime spectra. -/
def arrowIsoΓSpecOfIsAffine {A B : CommRingCat} (f : A ⟶ B) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk ((Spec.map f).appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality f).symm
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec = Scheme.Spec.mapIso (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).op :=
Iso.ext (SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_hom (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.hom = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).hom :=
(SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_inv (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.inv = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).inv :=
congr($(isoSpec_Spec R).inv)
lemma ext_of_isAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] {f g : X ⟶ Y} (e : f.appTop = g.appTop) :
f = g := by
rw [← cancel_mono Y.toSpecΓ, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, e]
namespace AffineScheme
/-- The `Spec` functor into the category of affine schemes. -/
def Spec : CommRingCatᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.toEssImage
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.toEssImage`. -/
instance Spec_full : Spec.Full := Functor.Full.toEssImage _
instance Spec_faithful : Spec.Faithful := Functor.Faithful.toEssImage _
instance Spec_essSurj : Spec.EssSurj := Functor.EssSurj.toEssImage (F := _)
/-- The forgetful functor `AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme`. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetToScheme : AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme :=
Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.essImageInclusion`. -/
instance forgetToScheme_full : forgetToScheme.Full :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Full
instance forgetToScheme_faithful : forgetToScheme.Faithful :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Faithful
/-- The global section functor of an affine scheme. -/
def Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat :=
forgetToScheme.op ⋙ Scheme.Γ
/-- The category of affine schemes is equivalent to the category of commutative rings. -/
def equivCommRingCat : AffineScheme ≌ CommRingCatᵒᵖ :=
equivEssImageOfReflective.symm
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.isEquivalence_functor
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.op.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.op.isEquivalence_functor
instance ΓIsEquiv : Γ.{u}.IsEquivalence :=
inferInstanceAs (Γ.{u}.rightOp.op ⋙ (opOpEquivalence _).functor).IsEquivalence
instance hasColimits : HasColimits AffineScheme.{u} :=
haveI := Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence.{u} Γ.{u}
Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence.{u} (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
instance hasLimits : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u} := by
haveI := Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence Γ.{u}
haveI : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u}ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
exact Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
noncomputable instance Γ_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits Γ.{u}.rightOp := inferInstance
noncomputable instance forgetToScheme_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits forgetToScheme := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true })
@preservesLimits_of_natIso _ _ _ _ _ _
(isoWhiskerRight equivCommRingCat.unitIso forgetToScheme).symm
change PreservesLimits (equivCommRingCat.functor ⋙ Scheme.Spec)
infer_instance
end AffineScheme
/-- An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is affine. -/
def IsAffineOpen {X : Scheme} (U : X.Opens) : Prop :=
IsAffine U
/-- The set of affine opens as a subset of `opens X`. -/
def Scheme.affineOpens (X : Scheme) : Set X.Opens :=
{U : X.Opens | IsAffineOpen U}
instance {Y : Scheme.{u}} (U : Y.affineOpens) : IsAffine U :=
U.property
theorem isAffineOpen_opensRange {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : IsOpenImmersion f] : IsAffineOpen (Scheme.Hom.opensRange f) := by
refine .of_isIso (IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq f (Y.ofRestrict _) ?_).inv
exact Subtype.range_val.symm
theorem isAffineOpen_top (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : IsAffineOpen (⊤ : X.Opens) := by
convert isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝟙 X)
ext1
exact Set.range_id.symm
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineBasisCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineBasisCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineBasisCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineOpenCover (X : Scheme) (𝒰 : X.AffineOpenCover) (i : 𝒰.J) :
IsAffine (𝒰.openCover.obj i) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsAffine (Spec (𝒰.obj i)))
instance {X} [IsAffine X] (i) :
IsAffine ((Scheme.coverOfIsIso (P := @IsOpenImmersion) (𝟙 X)).obj i) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
theorem isBasis_affine_open (X : Scheme) : Opens.IsBasis X.affineOpens := by
rw [Opens.isBasis_iff_nbhd]
rintro U x (hU : x ∈ (U : Set X))
obtain ⟨S, hS, hxS, hSU⟩ := X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open hU U.isOpen
refine ⟨⟨S, X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.isOpen hS⟩, ?_, hxS, hSU⟩
rcases hS with ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact isAffineOpen_opensRange _
theorem iSup_affineOpens_eq_top (X : Scheme) : ⨆ i : X.affineOpens, (i : X.Opens) = ⊤ := by
apply Opens.ext
rw [Opens.coe_iSup]
apply IsTopologicalBasis.sUnion_eq
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
exact isBasis_affine_open X
theorem Scheme.map_PrimeSpectrum_basicOpen_of_affine
(X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] (f : Γ(X, ⊤)) :
X.isoSpec.hom ⁻¹ᵁ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f = X.basicOpen f :=
Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _
theorem isBasis_basicOpen (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
Opens.IsBasis (Set.range (X.basicOpen : Γ(X, ⊤) → X.Opens)) := by
delta Opens.IsBasis
convert PrimeSpectrum.isBasis_basic_opens.isInducing
(TopCat.homeoOfIso (Scheme.forgetToTop.mapIso X.isoSpec)).isInducing using 1
ext
simp only [Set.mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _)
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _).symm
/-- The canonical map `U ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an open `U ⊆ X`. -/
noncomputable
def Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toScheme ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
U.toScheme.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map U.topIso.inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_SpecMap_map {X : Scheme} (U V : X.Opens) (h : U ≤ V) :
U.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (homOfLE h).op) = X.homOfLE h ≫ V.toSpecΓ := by
delta Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ
simp [← Spec.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_top {X : Scheme} :
(⊤ : X.Opens).toSpecΓ = (⊤ : X.Opens).ι ≫ X.toSpecΓ := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ, toSpecΓ_naturality]; rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_appTop {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toSpecΓ.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
namespace IsAffineOpen
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {U : X.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (f : Γ(X, U))
attribute [-simp] eqToHom_op in
/-- The isomorphism `U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an affine `U`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp inv]
def isoSpec :
↑U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
U.toScheme.isoSpec ≪≫ Scheme.Spec.mapIso U.topIso.symm.op
lemma isoSpec_hom : hU.isoSpec.hom = U.toSpecΓ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
open IsLocalRing in
lemma isoSpec_hom_base_apply (x : U) :
hU.isoSpec.hom.base x = (Spec.map (X.presheaf.germ U x x.2)).base (closedPoint _) := by
dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_base, Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
rw [← Scheme.comp_base_apply, ← Spec.map_comp,
(Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mpr (Scheme.Opens.germ_stalkIso_hom U (V := ⊤) x trivial),
X.presheaf.germ_res_assoc, Spec.map_comp, Scheme.comp_base_apply]
congr 1
exact IsLocalRing.comap_closedPoint (U.stalkIso x).inv.hom
lemma isoSpec_inv_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.inv.appTop = U.topIso.hom ≫ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv := by
simp_rw [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_obj, isoSpec_inv, Scheme.isoSpec, asIso_inv,
Scheme.comp_app, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality,
Scheme.inv_appTop, -- `check_compositions` reports defeq problems starting after this step.
IsIso.inv_comp_eq]
rw [Scheme.toSpecΓ_appTop]
-- We need `erw` here because the goal has
-- `Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(↑U, ⊤)).hom ≫ Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)).inv`
-- and `Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)` is non-reducibly defeq to `Γ(↑U, ⊤)`.
erw [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
simp only [Opens.map_top]
lemma isoSpec_hom_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.hom.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
have := congr(inv $hU.isoSpec_inv_appTop)
rw [IsIso.inv_comp, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_hom] at this
have := (Scheme.Γ.map_inv hU.isoSpec.inv.op).trans this
rwa [← op_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_inv_app_top := isoSpec_inv_appTop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_hom_app_top := isoSpec_hom_appTop
/-- The open immersion `Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`. -/
def fromSpec :
Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι
instance isOpenImmersion_fromSpec :
IsOpenImmersion hU.fromSpec := by
delta fromSpec
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_ι : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι = hU.fromSpec := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_fromSpec : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.fromSpec = U.ι := toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv_assoc _ _
@[simp]
theorem range_fromSpec :
Set.range hU.fromSpec.base = (U : Set X) := by
delta IsAffineOpen.fromSpec; dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_inv]
rw [Set.range_comp, Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· exact Subtype.range_coe
rw [← TopCat.coe_comp, ← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem opensRange_fromSpec : hU.fromSpec.opensRange = U := Opens.ext (range_fromSpec hU)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_fromSpec {V : X.Opens} (hV : IsAffineOpen V) (f : op U ⟶ op V) :
Spec.map (X.presheaf.map f) ≫ hU.fromSpec = hV.fromSpec := by
have : IsAffine U := hU
haveI : IsAffine _ := hV
conv_rhs =>
rw [fromSpec, ← X.homOfLE_ι (V := U) f.unop.le, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc,
← Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality_assoc,
← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.homOfLE_appTop, ← Functor.map_comp]
rw [fromSpec, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc, ← Spec.map_comp_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma Spec_map_appLE_fromSpec (f : X ⟶ Y) {V : X.Opens} {U : Y.Opens}
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) (hV : IsAffineOpen V) (i : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) :
Spec.map (f.appLE U V i) ≫ hU.fromSpec = hV.fromSpec ≫ f := by
have : IsAffine U := hU
simp only [IsAffineOpen.fromSpec, Category.assoc, isoSpec_inv]
simp_rw [← Scheme.homOfLE_ι _ i]
rw [Category.assoc, ← morphismRestrict_ι,
← Category.assoc _ (f ∣_ U) U.ι, ← @Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality_assoc,
← Spec.map_comp_assoc, ← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.comp_appTop, morphismRestrict_appTop,
Scheme.homOfLE_appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map,
Scheme.Hom.appLE_map, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map, Scheme.Hom.map_appLE]
lemma fromSpec_top [IsAffine X] : (isAffineOpen_top X).fromSpec = X.isoSpec.inv := by
rw [fromSpec, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc, ← @Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality,
| ← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.Opens.ι_appTop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← op_comp,
eqToHom_comp_homOfLE, ← eqToHom_eq_homOfLE rfl, eqToHom_refl, op_id, X.presheaf.map_id,
Spec.map_id, Category.id_comp]
lemma fromSpec_app_of_le (V : X.Opens) (h : U ≤ V) :
hU.fromSpec.app V = X.presheaf.map (homOfLE h).op ≫
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv ≫ (Spec _).presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op := by
have : U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V = ⊤ := eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ ↦ h x.2
rw [IsAffineOpen.fromSpec, Scheme.comp_app, Scheme.Opens.ι_app, Scheme.app_eq _ this,
← Scheme.Hom.appTop, IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_inv_appTop]
simp only [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_map, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom,
Category.assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp_assoc]
rfl
include hU in
protected theorem isCompact :
IsCompact (U : Set X) := by
convert @IsCompact.image _ _ _ _ Set.univ hU.fromSpec.base PrimeSpectrum.compactSpace.1
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/AffineScheme.lean | 419 | 436 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Frobenius
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Verschiebung
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.MulP
/-!
## Identities between operations on the ring of Witt vectors
In this file we derive common identities between the Frobenius and Verschiebung operators.
## Main declarations
* `frobenius_verschiebung`: the composition of Frobenius and Verschiebung is multiplication by `p`
* `verschiebung_mul_frobenius`: the “projection formula”: `V(x * F y) = V x * y`
* `iterate_verschiebung_mul_coeff`: an identity from [Haze09] 6.2
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
-- type as `\bbW`
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
noncomputable section
-- Porting note: `ghost_calc` failure: `simp only []` and the manual instances had to be added.
/-- The composition of Frobenius and Verschiebung is multiplication by `p`. -/
theorem frobenius_verschiebung (x : 𝕎 R) : frobenius (verschiebung x) = x * p := by
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ frobenius (verschiebung x) :=
IsPoly.comp (hg := frobenius_isPoly p) (hf := verschiebung_isPoly)
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ x * p := mulN_isPoly p p
ghost_calc x
ghost_simp [mul_comm]
/-- Verschiebung is the same as multiplication by `p` on the ring of Witt vectors of `ZMod p`. -/
theorem verschiebung_zmod (x : 𝕎 (ZMod p)) : verschiebung x = x * p := by
rw [← frobenius_verschiebung, frobenius_zmodp]
variable (p R)
theorem coeff_p_pow [CharP R p] (i : ℕ) : ((p : 𝕎 R) ^ i).coeff i = 1 := by
induction' i with i h
· simp only [one_coeff_zero, Ne, pow_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, ← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP,
verschiebung_coeff_succ, h, one_pow]
theorem coeff_p_pow_eq_zero [CharP R p] {i j : ℕ} (hj : j ≠ i) : ((p : 𝕎 R) ^ i).coeff j = 0 := by
induction' i with i hi generalizing j
· rw [pow_zero, one_coeff_eq_of_pos]
exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hj
· rw [pow_succ, ← frobenius_verschiebung, coeff_frobenius_charP]
cases j
· rw [verschiebung_coeff_zero, zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
· rw [verschiebung_coeff_succ, hi (ne_of_apply_ne _ hj), zero_pow hp.out.ne_zero]
theorem coeff_p [CharP R p] (i : ℕ) : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff i = if i = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with hi
· simpa only [hi, pow_one] using coeff_p_pow p R 1
· simpa only [pow_one] using coeff_p_pow_eq_zero p R hi
@[simp]
theorem coeff_p_zero [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff 0 = 0 := by
rw [coeff_p, if_neg]
exact zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem coeff_p_one [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R).coeff 1 = 1 := by rw [coeff_p, if_pos rfl]
theorem p_nonzero [Nontrivial R] [CharP R p] : (p : 𝕎 R) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
simpa only [h, zero_coeff, zero_ne_one] using coeff_p_one p R
theorem FractionRing.p_nonzero [Nontrivial R] [CharP R p] : (p : FractionRing (𝕎 R)) ≠ 0 := by
simpa using (IsFractionRing.injective (𝕎 R) (FractionRing (𝕎 R))).ne (WittVector.p_nonzero _ _)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Identities.lean | 87 | 87 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective
convert_to IsIso (Y.presheaf.map (𝟙 _))
· congr
· -- Porting note: was `apply Subsingleton.helim; rw [this]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
congr
· simp only [unop_op]
congr
apply Subsingleton.helim
rw [this]
· infer_instance
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : PresheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ := by
delta invApp
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
change X.presheaf.map _ = X.presheaf.map _
congr 1
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
have : ∀ (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ), IsIso (f.c.app U) := by
intro U
have : U = op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj (unop U))) := by
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq _ ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')).symm
convert H.c_iso (Opens.map f.base |>.obj <| unop U)
have : IsIso f.c := NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isIso_of_components
let t : X ≃ₜ Y := H.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := Subtype.val
invFun := fun x =>
⟨x, by rw [Set.range_eq_univ.mpr ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')]; trivial⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
exact (TopCat.isoOfHomeo t).isIso_hom
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
infer_instance
end
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- (Implementation.) The projection map when constructing the pullback along an open immersion.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftFst :
Y.restrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base) ⟶ X where
base := pullback.fst _ _
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
hf.invApp _ (unop U) ≫
g.c.app (op (hf.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj (unop U))) ≫
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
simp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, unop_op, op_inj_iff, Opens.map,
Subtype.coe_mk, Functor.op_obj]
apply LE.le.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype _ _).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h₂⟩
-- Porting note: need a slight hand holding
-- used to be `simpa using h₁` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
change _ ∈ _ ⁻¹' _ ∧ _
simp only [TopCat.coe_of, restrict_carrier, Set.preimage_id', Set.mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· change _ ∈ U.unop at h₁
convert h₁
rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
· rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
· rintro _ ⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, h₁, CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩))
naturality := by
intro U V i
induction U
induction V
-- Note: this doesn't fire in `simp` because of reduction of the term via structure eta
-- before discrimination tree key generation
rw [inv_naturality_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl }
theorem pullback_cone_of_left_condition : pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ ≫ g := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun U => ?_
· simpa using pullback.condition
· induction U
-- Porting note: `NatTrans.comp_app` is not picked up by `dsimp`
-- Perhaps see : https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op, whiskerRight_app, pullbackConeOfLeftFst]
-- simp only [ofRestrict_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [app_invApp_assoc,
eqToHom_app, Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
erw [← Y.presheaf.map_comp, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
/-- We construct the pullback along an open immersion via restricting along the pullback of the
maps of underlying spaces (which is also an open embedding).
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g) (Y.ofRestrict _)
(pullback_cone_of_left_condition f g)
variable (s : PullbackCone f g)
/-- (Implementation.) Any cone over `cospan f g` indeed factors through the constructed cone.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftLift : s.pt ⟶ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).pt where
base :=
pullback.lift s.fst.base s.snd.base
(congr_arg (fun x => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base x) s.condition)
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
s.snd.c.app _ ≫
s.pt.presheaf.map
| (eqToHom
(by
dsimp only [Opens.map, IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op]
congr 2
let s' : PullbackCone f.base g.base := PullbackCone.mk s.fst.base s.snd.base
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this is just an underscore
(congr_arg Hom.base s.condition)
have : _ = s.snd.base := limit.lift_π s' WalkingCospan.right
conv_lhs =>
rw [← this]
dsimp [s']
rw [Function.comp_def, ← Set.preimage_preimage]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 361 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Flat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Continuous
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Cover-preserving functors between sites.
In order to show that a functor is continuous, we define cover-preserving functors
between sites as functors that push covering sieves to covering sieves.
Then, a cover-preserving and compatible-preserving functor is continuous.
## Main definitions
* `CategoryTheory.CoverPreserving`: a functor between sites is cover-preserving if it
pushes covering sieves to covering sieves
* `CategoryTheory.CompatiblePreserving`: a functor between sites is compatible-preserving
if it pushes compatible families of elements to compatible families.
## Main results
- `CategoryTheory.isContinuous_of_coverPreserving`: If `G : C ⥤ D` is
cover-preserving and compatible-preserving, then `G` is a continuous functor,
i.e. `G.op ⋙ -` as a functor `(Dᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A)` of presheaves maps sheaves to sheaves.
## References
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.3.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00WU
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Opposite CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements CategoryTheory.Presieve
CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C) (K : GrothendieckTopology D)
variable {L : GrothendieckTopology A}
/-- A functor `G : (C, J) ⥤ (D, K)` between sites is *cover-preserving*
if for all covering sieves `R` in `C`, `R.functorPushforward G` is a covering sieve in `D`.
-/
structure CoverPreserving (G : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
cover_preserve : ∀ {U : C} {S : Sieve U} (_ : S ∈ J U), S.functorPushforward G ∈ K (G.obj U)
/-- The identity functor on a site is cover-preserving. -/
theorem idCoverPreserving : CoverPreserving J J (𝟭 _) :=
⟨fun hS => by simpa using hS⟩
/-- The composition of two cover-preserving functors is cover-preserving. -/
theorem CoverPreserving.comp {F} (hF : CoverPreserving J K F) {G} (hG : CoverPreserving K L G) :
CoverPreserving J L (F ⋙ G) :=
⟨fun hS => by
rw [Sieve.functorPushforward_comp]
exact hG.cover_preserve (hF.cover_preserve hS)⟩
/-- A functor `G : (C, J) ⥤ (D, K)` between sites is called compatible preserving if for each
compatible family of elements at `C` and valued in `G.op ⋙ ℱ`, and each commuting diagram
`f₁ ≫ G.map g₁ = f₂ ≫ G.map g₂`, `x g₁` and `x g₂` coincide when restricted via `fᵢ`.
This is actually stronger than merely preserving compatible families because of the definition of
`functorPushforward` used.
-/
structure CompatiblePreserving (K : GrothendieckTopology D) (G : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
compatible :
∀ (ℱ : Sheaf K (Type w)) {Z} {T : Presieve Z} {x : FamilyOfElements (G.op ⋙ ℱ.val) T}
(_ : x.Compatible) {Y₁ Y₂} {X} (f₁ : X ⟶ G.obj Y₁) (f₂ : X ⟶ G.obj Y₂) {g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z}
{g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z} (hg₁ : T g₁) (hg₂ : T g₂) (_ : f₁ ≫ G.map g₁ = f₂ ≫ G.map g₂),
ℱ.val.map f₁.op (x g₁ hg₁) = ℱ.val.map f₂.op (x g₂ hg₂)
section
variable {J K} {G : C ⥤ D} (hG : CompatiblePreserving.{w} K G) (ℱ : Sheaf K (Type w)) {Z : C}
variable {T : Presieve Z} {x : FamilyOfElements (G.op ⋙ ℱ.val) T} (h : x.Compatible)
include hG h
/-- `CompatiblePreserving` functors indeed preserve compatible families. -/
theorem Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPushforward :
(x.functorPushforward G).Compatible := by
rintro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁' f₂' H₁ H₂ eq
unfold FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward
rcases getFunctorPushforwardStructure H₁ with ⟨X₁, f₁, h₁, hf₁, rfl⟩
rcases getFunctorPushforwardStructure H₂ with ⟨X₂, f₂, h₂, hf₂, rfl⟩
suffices ℱ.val.map (g₁ ≫ h₁).op (x f₁ hf₁) = ℱ.val.map (g₂ ≫ h₂).op (x f₂ hf₂) by
simpa using this
apply hG.compatible ℱ h _ _ hf₁ hf₂
simpa using eq
@[simp]
theorem CompatiblePreserving.apply_map {Y : C} {f : Y ⟶ Z} (hf : T f) :
x.functorPushforward G (G.map f) (image_mem_functorPushforward G T hf) = x f hf := by
unfold FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward
rcases getFunctorPushforwardStructure (image_mem_functorPushforward G T hf) with
⟨X, g, f', hg, eq⟩
simpa using hG.compatible ℱ h f' (𝟙 _) hg hf (by simp [eq])
end
open Limits.WalkingCospan
theorem compatiblePreservingOfFlat {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
(K : GrothendieckTopology D) (G : C ⥤ D) [RepresentablyFlat G] : CompatiblePreserving K G := by
constructor
intro ℱ Z T x hx Y₁ Y₂ X f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ hg₁ hg₂ e
-- First, `f₁` and `f₂` form a cone over `cospan g₁ g₂ ⋙ u`.
let c : Cone (cospan g₁ g₂ ⋙ G) :=
| (Cones.postcompose (diagramIsoCospan (cospan g₁ g₂ ⋙ G)).inv).obj (PullbackCone.mk f₁ f₂ e)
/-
This can then be viewed as a cospan of structured arrows, and we may obtain an arbitrary cone
over it since `StructuredArrow W u` is cofiltered.
Then, it suffices to prove that it is compatible when restricted onto `u(c'.X.right)`.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/CoverPreserving.lean | 116 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.GCDMonoid
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
/-!
# Squarefree elements of monoids
An element of a monoid is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares
except the squares of units.
Results about squarefree natural numbers are proved in `Data.Nat.Squarefree`.
## Main Definitions
- `Squarefree r` indicates that `r` is only divisible by `x * x` if `x` is a unit.
## Main Results
- `multiplicity.squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one`: `x` is `Squarefree` iff for every `y`, either
`emultiplicity y x ≤ 1` or `IsUnit y`.
- `UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A nonzero element `x` of a unique
factorization monoid is squarefree iff `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- An element of a monoid is squarefree if the only squares that
divide it are the squares of units. -/
def Squarefree [Monoid R] (r : R) : Prop :=
∀ x : R, x * x ∣ r → IsUnit x
theorem IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (h : Squarefree (m * n)) :
IsRelPrime m n := fun c hca hcb ↦ h c (mul_dvd_mul hca hcb)
@[simp]
theorem IsUnit.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : IsUnit x) : Squarefree x := fun _ hdvd =>
isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (isUnit_of_dvd_unit hdvd h)
theorem squarefree_one [CommMonoid R] : Squarefree (1 : R) :=
isUnit_one.squarefree
@[simp]
theorem not_squarefree_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] : ¬Squarefree (0 : R) := by
erw [not_forall]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem Squarefree.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] {m : R} (hm : Squarefree (m : R)) :
m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_squarefree_zero hm
@[simp]
theorem Irreducible.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : Irreducible x) : Squarefree x := by
rintro y ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [mul_assoc] at hz
rcases h.isUnit_or_isUnit hz with (hu | hu)
· exact hu
· apply isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left hu
@[simp]
theorem Prime.squarefree [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] {x : R} (h : Prime x) : Squarefree x :=
h.irreducible.squarefree
theorem Squarefree.of_mul_left [Monoid R] {m n : R} (hmn : Squarefree (m * n)) : Squarefree m :=
fun p hp => hmn p (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hp n)
theorem Squarefree.of_mul_right [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (hmn : Squarefree (m * n)) :
Squarefree n := fun p hp => hmn p (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hp m)
theorem Squarefree.squarefree_of_dvd [Monoid R] {x y : R} (hdvd : x ∣ y) (hsq : Squarefree y) :
Squarefree x := fun _ h => hsq _ (h.trans hdvd)
theorem Squarefree.eq_zero_or_one_of_pow_of_not_isUnit [Monoid R] {x : R} {n : ℕ}
(h : Squarefree (x ^ n)) (h' : ¬ IsUnit x) :
n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
contrapose! h'
replace h' : 2 ≤ n := by omega
have : x * x ∣ x ^ n := by rw [← sq]; exact pow_dvd_pow x h'
exact h.squarefree_of_dvd this x (refl _)
theorem Squarefree.pow_dvd_of_pow_dvd [Monoid R] {x y : R} {n : ℕ}
(hx : Squarefree y) (h : x ^ n ∣ y) : x ^ n ∣ x := by
by_cases hu : IsUnit x
· exact (hu.pow n).dvd
· rcases (hx.squarefree_of_dvd h).eq_zero_or_one_of_pow_of_not_isUnit hu with rfl | rfl <;> simp
section SquarefreeGcdOfSquarefree
variable {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
theorem Squarefree.gcd_right (a : α) {b : α} (hb : Squarefree b) : Squarefree (gcd a b) :=
hb.squarefree_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem Squarefree.gcd_left {a : α} (b : α) (ha : Squarefree a) : Squarefree (gcd a b) :=
ha.squarefree_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
end SquarefreeGcdOfSquarefree
theorem squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one [CommMonoid R] (r : R) :
Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, emultiplicity x r ≤ 1 ∨ IsUnit x := by
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_
rw [← sq, pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le, imp_congr _ Iff.rfl]
norm_cast
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two]
exact Order.add_one_le_iff_of_not_isMax (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one := squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one
section Irreducible
variable [CommMonoidWithZero R] [WfDvdMonoid R]
theorem squarefree_iff_no_irreducibles {x : R} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) :
Squarefree x ↔ ∀ p, Irreducible p → ¬ (p * p ∣ x) := by
refine ⟨fun h p hp hp' ↦ hp.not_isUnit (h p hp'), fun h d hd ↦ by_contra fun hdu ↦ ?_⟩
have hd₀ : d ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero (ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hx₀ hd) (dvd_mul_left d d)
obtain ⟨p, irr, dvd⟩ := WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor hdu hd₀
exact h p irr ((mul_dvd_mul dvd dvd).trans hd)
theorem irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree (r : R) :
(∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r) ↔ (r = 0 ∧ ∀ x : R, ¬Irreducible x) ∨ Squarefree r := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· exact .inl (by simpa using h)
· exact .inr ((squarefree_iff_no_irreducibles hr).mpr h)
· rintro (⟨rfl, h⟩ | h)
· simpa using h
intro x hx t
exact hx.not_isUnit (h x t)
theorem squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_ne_zero {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r := by
simpa [hr] using (irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree r).symm
theorem squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible {r : R}
(hr : ∃ x : R, Irreducible x) : Squarefree r ↔ ∀ x : R, Irreducible x → ¬x * x ∣ r := by
rw [irreducible_sq_not_dvd_iff_eq_zero_and_no_irreducibles_or_squarefree, ← not_exists]
simp only [hr, not_true, false_or, and_false]
end Irreducible
section IsRadical
section
variable [CommMonoidWithZero R] [DecompositionMonoid R]
theorem Squarefree.isRadical {x : R} (hx : Squarefree x) : IsRadical x :=
(isRadical_iff_pow_one_lt 2 one_lt_two).2 fun y hy ↦ by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (sq y ▸ hy)
exact (IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul hx).mul_dvd ha hb
theorem Squarefree.dvd_pow_iff_dvd {x y : R} {n : ℕ} (hsq : Squarefree x) (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
x ∣ y ^ n ↔ x ∣ y := ⟨hsq.isRadical n y, (·.pow h0)⟩
end
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] {x y p d : R}
theorem IsRadical.squarefree (h0 : x ≠ 0) (h : IsRadical x) : Squarefree x := by
rintro z ⟨w, rfl⟩
specialize h 2 (z * w) ⟨w, by simp_rw [pow_two, mul_left_comm, ← mul_assoc]⟩
rwa [← one_mul (z * w), mul_assoc, mul_dvd_mul_iff_right, ← isUnit_iff_dvd_one] at h
rw [mul_assoc, mul_ne_zero_iff] at h0; exact h0.2
namespace Squarefree
theorem pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_right {k : ℕ}
(hx : Squarefree x) (hp : Prime p) (h : p ^ (k + 1) ∣ x * y) :
p ^ k ∣ y := by
by_cases hxp : p ∣ x
· obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := hxp
have hx' : ¬ p ∣ x' := fun contra ↦ hp.not_unit <| hx p (mul_dvd_mul_left p contra)
replace h : p ^ k ∣ x' * y := by
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc] at h
exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hp.ne_zero).mp h
exact hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _ hx' h
· exact (pow_dvd_pow _ k.le_succ).trans (hp.pow_dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _ hxp h)
theorem pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_left {k : ℕ}
(hy : Squarefree y) (hp : Prime p) (h : p ^ (k + 1) ∣ x * y) :
p ^ k ∣ x := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact pow_dvd_of_squarefree_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_right hy hp h
variable [DecompositionMonoid R]
theorem dvd_of_squarefree_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (hx : Squarefree x) (h : d * d ∣ x * y) : d ∣ y := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, eq⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul h
replace ha : Squarefree a := hx.squarefree_of_dvd ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : a ∣ d := ha.isRadical 2 d ⟨b, by rw [sq, eq]⟩
rw [hc, mul_assoc, (mul_right_injective₀ ha.ne_zero).eq_iff] at eq
exact dvd_trans ⟨c, by rw [hc, ← eq, mul_comm]⟩ hb
theorem dvd_of_squarefree_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (hy : Squarefree y) (h : d * d ∣ x * y) : d ∣ x :=
dvd_of_squarefree_of_mul_dvd_mul_right hy (mul_comm x y ▸ h)
end Squarefree
variable [DecompositionMonoid R]
/-- `x * y` is square-free iff `x` and `y` have no common factors and are themselves square-free. -/
theorem squarefree_mul_iff : Squarefree (x * y) ↔ IsRelPrime x y ∧ Squarefree x ∧ Squarefree y :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul h, h.of_mul_left, h.of_mul_right⟩,
fun ⟨hp, sqx, sqy⟩ _ dvd ↦ hp (sqy.dvd_of_squarefree_of_mul_dvd_mul_left dvd)
(sqx.dvd_of_squarefree_of_mul_dvd_mul_right dvd)⟩
theorem isRadical_iff_squarefree_or_zero : IsRadical x ↔ Squarefree x ∨ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx ↦ (em <| x = 0).elim .inr fun h ↦ .inl <| hx.squarefree h,
Or.rec Squarefree.isRadical <| by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_isRadical_iff]
infer_instance⟩
theorem isRadical_iff_squarefree_of_ne_zero (h : x ≠ 0) : IsRadical x ↔ Squarefree x :=
⟨IsRadical.squarefree h, Squarefree.isRadical⟩
end IsRadical
namespace UniqueFactorizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero R] [UniqueFactorizationMonoid R]
lemma _root_.exists_squarefree_dvd_pow_of_ne_zero {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ (y : R) (n : ℕ), Squarefree y ∧ y ∣ x ∧ x ∣ y ^ n := by
induction x using WfDvdMonoid.induction_on_irreducible with
| zero => contradiction
| unit u hu => exact ⟨1, 0, squarefree_one, one_dvd u, hu.dvd⟩
| mul z p hz hp ih =>
obtain ⟨y, n, hy, hyx, hy'⟩ := ih hz
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hn
· exact ⟨p, 1, hp.squarefree, dvd_mul_right p z, by simp [isUnit_of_dvd_one (pow_zero y ▸ hy')]⟩
by_cases hp' : p ∣ y
· exact ⟨y, n + 1, hy, dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hyx _,
mul_comm p z ▸ pow_succ y n ▸ mul_dvd_mul hy' hp'⟩
· suffices Squarefree (p * y) from ⟨p * y, n, this,
mul_dvd_mul_left p hyx, mul_pow p y n ▸ mul_dvd_mul (dvd_pow_self p hn.ne') hy'⟩
exact squarefree_mul_iff.mpr ⟨hp.isRelPrime_iff_not_dvd.mpr hp', hp.squarefree, hy⟩
theorem squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors [NormalizationMonoid R] {x : R}
(x0 : x ≠ 0) : Squarefree x ↔ Multiset.Nodup (normalizedFactors x) := by
classical
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one, Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
haveI := nontrivial_of_ne x 0 x0
constructor <;> intro h a
· by_cases hmem : a ∈ normalizedFactors x
· have ha := irreducible_of_normalized_factor _ hmem
rcases h a with (h | h)
· rw [← normalize_normalized_factor _ hmem]
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors ha x0] at h
assumption_mod_cast
· have := ha.1
contradiction
· simp [Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hmem]
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro hu
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | h0
· simp [x0]
rcases WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor hu h0 with ⟨b, hib, hdvd⟩
apply le_trans (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left hdvd)
rw [emultiplicity_eq_count_normalizedFactors hib x0]
exact_mod_cast h (normalize b)
end UniqueFactorizationMonoid
namespace Int
@[simp]
theorem squarefree_natAbs {n : ℤ} : Squarefree n.natAbs ↔ Squarefree n := by
simp_rw [Squarefree, natAbs_surjective.forall, ← natAbs_mul, natAbs_dvd_natAbs,
isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff]
@[simp]
theorem squarefree_natCast {n : ℕ} : Squarefree (n : ℤ) ↔ Squarefree n := by
rw [← squarefree_natAbs, natAbs_natCast]
|
end Int
| Mathlib/Algebra/Squarefree/Basic.lean | 284 | 306 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Real
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts of analytic nature on the complex numbers.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives tools
on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, it defines the following functions in the
namespace `Complex`.
|Name |Type |Description |
|------------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|`equivRealProdCLM`|ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ|The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ` |
|`reCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Real part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`imCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Imaginary part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealCLM` |ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealLI` |ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `LinearIsometry` |
|`conjCLE` |ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `ContinuousLinearEquiv` |
|`conjLIE` |ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `LinearIsometryEquiv` |
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `RCLike` field.
-/
assert_not_exists Absorbs
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
variable {z : ℂ}
open ComplexConjugate Topology Filter
instance : NormedField ℂ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul := Complex.norm_mul
instance : DenselyNormedField ℂ where
lt_norm_lt r₁ r₂ h₀ hr :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := exists_between hr
⟨x, by rwa [norm_real, Real.norm_of_nonneg (h₀.trans_lt h.1).le]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [NormedField R] [NormedAlgebra R ℝ] : NormedAlgebra R ℂ where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul ℝ r x, real_smul, norm_mul, norm_real, norm_algebraMap']
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The module structure from `Module.complexToReal` is a normed space. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedSpace.complexToReal : NormedSpace ℝ E :=
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ E
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The algebra structure from `Algebra.complexToReal` is a normed algebra. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedAlgebra.complexToReal {A : Type*} [SeminormedRing A]
[NormedAlgebra ℂ A] : NormedAlgebra ℝ A :=
NormedAlgebra.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ A
-- This result cannot be moved to `Data/Complex/Norm` since `ℤ` gets its norm from its
-- normed ring structure and that file does not know about rings
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_intCast (n : ℤ) : ‖(n : ℂ)‖₊ = ‖n‖₊ := by
ext; exact norm_intCast n
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias comap_abs_nhds_zero := comap_norm_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias continuous_abs := continuous_norm
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_normSq : Continuous normSq := by
simpa [← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] using continuous_norm (E := ℂ).pow 2
theorem nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖₊ = 1 :=
(pow_left_inj₀ zero_le' zero_le' hn).1 <| by rw [← nnnorm_pow, h, nnnorm_one, one_pow]
theorem norm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖ = 1 :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one h hn)
lemma le_of_eq_sum_of_eq_sum_norm {ι : Type*} {a b : ℝ} (f : ι → ℂ) (s : Finset ι) (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a)
(ha : a = ∑ i ∈ s, f i) (hb : b = ∑ i ∈ s, (‖f i‖ : ℂ)) : a ≤ b := by
norm_cast at hb; rw [← Complex.norm_of_nonneg ha₀, ha, hb]; exact norm_sum_le s f
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ := by
simp [Prod.norm_def, abs_re_le_norm, abs_im_le_norm]
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le' (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ 1 * ‖z‖ := by
simpa using equivRealProd_apply_le z
theorem lipschitz_equivRealProd : LipschitzWith 1 equivRealProd := by
simpa using AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm 1 equivRealProd_apply_le'
theorem antilipschitz_equivRealProd : AntilipschitzWith (NNReal.sqrt 2) equivRealProd :=
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm fun z ↦ by
simpa only [Real.coe_sqrt, NNReal.coe_ofNat] using norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z
theorem isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd : IsUniformEmbedding equivRealProd :=
antilipschitz_equivRealProd.isUniformEmbedding lipschitz_equivRealProd.uniformContinuous
instance : CompleteSpace ℂ :=
(completeSpace_congr isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd).mpr inferInstance
instance instT2Space : T2Space ℂ := TopologicalSpace.t2Space_of_metrizableSpace
/-- The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs apply symm_apply_re symm_apply_im]
def equivRealProdCLM : ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ :=
equivRealProdLm.toContinuousLinearEquivOfBounds 1 (√2) equivRealProd_apply_le' fun p =>
norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max (equivRealProd.symm p)
theorem equivRealProdCLM_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) :
Complex.equivRealProdCLM.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * Complex.I := Complex.equivRealProd_symm_apply p
instance : ProperSpace ℂ := lipschitz_equivRealProd.properSpace
equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.isProperMap
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias tendsto_abs_cocompact_atTop :=
tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
/-- The `normSq` function on `ℂ` is proper. -/
theorem tendsto_normSq_cocompact_atTop : Tendsto normSq (cocompact ℂ) atTop := by
simpa [norm_mul_self_eq_normSq]
using tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop.atTop_mul_atTop₀ (tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop (E := ℂ))
open ContinuousLinearMap
/-- Continuous linear map version of the real part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def reCLM : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
reLm.mkContinuous 1 fun x => by simp [abs_re_le_norm]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_re : Continuous re :=
reCLM.continuous
lemma uniformlyContinuous_re : UniformContinuous re :=
reCLM.uniformContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-04")] alias uniformlyContinous_re := uniformlyContinuous_re
@[simp]
theorem reCLM_coe : (reCLM : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = reLm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reCLM_apply (z : ℂ) : (reCLM : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.re :=
rfl
/-- Continuous linear map version of the imaginary part function, from `ℂ` to `ℝ`. -/
def imCLM : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
imLm.mkContinuous 1 fun x => by simp [abs_im_le_norm]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_im : Continuous im :=
imCLM.continuous
lemma uniformlyContinuous_im : UniformContinuous im :=
imCLM.uniformContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-04")] alias uniformlyContinous_im := uniformlyContinuous_im
@[simp]
theorem imCLM_coe : (imCLM : ℂ →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) = imLm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imCLM_apply (z : ℂ) : (imCLM : ℂ → ℝ) z = z.im :=
rfl
theorem restrictScalars_one_smulRight' (x : E) :
ContinuousLinearMap.restrictScalars ℝ ((1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight x : ℂ →L[ℂ] E) =
reCLM.smulRight x + I • imCLM.smulRight x := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩
simp [map_add, mk_eq_add_mul_I, mul_smul, smul_comm I b x]
theorem restrictScalars_one_smulRight (x : ℂ) :
ContinuousLinearMap.restrictScalars ℝ ((1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight x : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ) =
x • (1 : ℂ →L[ℝ] ℂ) := by
ext1 z
dsimp
apply mul_comm
/-- The complex-conjugation function from `ℂ` to itself is an isometric linear equivalence. -/
def conjLIE : ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ :=
⟨conjAe.toLinearEquiv, norm_conj⟩
@[simp]
theorem conjLIE_apply (z : ℂ) : conjLIE z = conj z :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conjLIE_symm : conjLIE.symm = conjLIE :=
rfl
theorem isometry_conj : Isometry (conj : ℂ → ℂ) :=
conjLIE.isometry
@[simp]
theorem dist_conj_conj (z w : ℂ) : dist (conj z) (conj w) = dist z w :=
isometry_conj.dist_eq z w
@[simp]
theorem nndist_conj_conj (z w : ℂ) : nndist (conj z) (conj w) = nndist z w :=
isometry_conj.nndist_eq z w
theorem dist_conj_comm (z w : ℂ) : dist (conj z) w = dist z (conj w) := by
rw [← dist_conj_conj, conj_conj]
theorem nndist_conj_comm (z w : ℂ) : nndist (conj z) w = nndist z (conj w) :=
Subtype.ext <| dist_conj_comm _ _
instance : ContinuousStar ℂ :=
⟨conjLIE.continuous⟩
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_conj : Continuous (conj : ℂ → ℂ) :=
continuous_star
/-- The only continuous ring homomorphisms from `ℂ` to `ℂ` are the identity and the complex
conjugation. -/
theorem ringHom_eq_id_or_conj_of_continuous {f : ℂ →+* ℂ} (hf : Continuous f) :
f = RingHom.id ℂ ∨ f = conj := by
simpa only [DFunLike.ext_iff] using real_algHom_eq_id_or_conj (AlgHom.mk' f (map_real_smul f hf))
/-- Continuous linear equiv version of the conj function, from `ℂ` to `ℂ`. -/
def conjCLE : ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℂ :=
conjLIE
@[simp]
theorem conjCLE_coe : conjCLE.toLinearEquiv = conjAe.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem conjCLE_apply (z : ℂ) : conjCLE z = conj z :=
rfl
/-- Linear isometry version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def ofRealLI : ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ :=
⟨ofRealAm.toLinearMap, norm_real⟩
theorem isometry_ofReal : Isometry ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.isometry
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.continuous
theorem isUniformEmbedding_ofReal : IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) :=
ofRealLI.isometry.isUniformEmbedding
lemma _root_.RCLike.isUniformEmbedding_ofReal {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] :
IsUniformEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ → 𝕜) :=
RCLike.ofRealLI.isometry.isUniformEmbedding
theorem _root_.Filter.tendsto_ofReal_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : ℂ)) l (𝓝 (x : ℂ)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
isUniformEmbedding_ofReal.isClosedEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma _root_.Filter.tendsto_ofReal_iff' {α 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : 𝕜)) l (𝓝 (x : 𝕜)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
RCLike.isUniformEmbedding_ofReal.isClosedEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
lemma _root_.Filter.Tendsto.ofReal {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x : ℂ)) l (𝓝 (x : ℂ)) :=
tendsto_ofReal_iff.mpr hf
/-- The only continuous ring homomorphism from `ℝ` to `ℂ` is the identity. -/
theorem ringHom_eq_ofReal_of_continuous {f : ℝ →+* ℂ} (h : Continuous f) : f = ofRealHom := by
convert congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom <| Subsingleton.elim (AlgHom.mk' f <| map_real_smul f h)
(Algebra.ofId ℝ ℂ)
/-- Continuous linear map version of the canonical embedding of `ℝ` in `ℂ`. -/
def ofRealCLM : ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ :=
ofRealLI.toContinuousLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem ofRealCLM_coe : (ofRealCLM : ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ) = ofRealAm.toLinearMap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofRealCLM_apply (x : ℝ) : ofRealCLM x = x :=
rfl
noncomputable instance : RCLike ℂ where
re := ⟨⟨Complex.re, Complex.zero_re⟩, Complex.add_re⟩
im := ⟨⟨Complex.im, Complex.zero_im⟩, Complex.add_im⟩
I := Complex.I
I_re_ax := I_re
I_mul_I_ax := .inr Complex.I_mul_I
re_add_im_ax := re_add_im
ofReal_re_ax := ofReal_re
ofReal_im_ax := ofReal_im
mul_re_ax := mul_re
mul_im_ax := mul_im
conj_re_ax _ := rfl
conj_im_ax _ := rfl
conj_I_ax := conj_I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := (normSq_eq_norm_sq z).symm
mul_im_I_ax _ := mul_one _
toPartialOrder := Complex.partialOrder
le_iff_re_im := Iff.rfl
theorem _root_.RCLike.re_eq_complex_re : ⇑(RCLike.re : ℂ →+ ℝ) = Complex.re :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RCLike.im_eq_complex_im : ⇑(RCLike.im : ℂ →+ ℝ) = Complex.im :=
rfl
-- TODO: Replace `mul_conj` and `conj_mul` once `norm` has replaced `abs`
lemma mul_conj' (z : ℂ) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := RCLike.mul_conj z
lemma conj_mul' (z : ℂ) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := RCLike.conj_mul z
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z := RCLike.inv_eq_conj hz
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (z : ℂ) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ‖z‖ = c * z :=
RCLike.exists_norm_eq_mul_self _
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (z : ℂ) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖z‖ = z :=
RCLike.exists_norm_mul_eq_self _
/-- The natural isomorphism between `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike 𝕜` and `ℂ` when
`RCLike.im RCLike.I = 1`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.RCLike.complexRingEquiv {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
(h : RCLike.im (RCLike.I : 𝕜) = 1) : 𝕜 ≃+* ℂ where
toFun x := RCLike.re x + RCLike.im x * I
invFun x := re x + im x * RCLike.I
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp [h]
map_add' x y := by simp only [map_add, ofReal_add]; ring
map_mul' x y := by
simp only [RCLike.mul_re, ofReal_sub, ofReal_mul, RCLike.mul_im, ofReal_add]
ring_nf
rw [I_sq]
ring
/-- The natural `ℝ`-linear isometry equivalence between `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike 𝕜` and `ℂ` when
`RCLike.im RCLike.I = 1`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.RCLike.complexLinearIsometryEquiv {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
(h : RCLike.im (RCLike.I : 𝕜) = 1) : 𝕜 ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ where
map_smul' _ _ := by simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im, ofReal_mul]; ring
norm_map' _ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ (by positivity) (by positivity), ← normSq_eq_norm_sq, ← RCLike.normSq_eq_def',
RCLike.normSq_apply]
simp [normSq_add]
__ := RCLike.complexRingEquiv h
theorem isometry_intCast : Isometry ((↑) : ℤ → ℂ) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq <| by simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.isometry_ofReal.dist_eq, Int.dist_cast_real, implies_true]
theorem closedEmbedding_intCast : IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : ℤ → ℂ) :=
isometry_intCast.isClosedEmbedding
lemma isClosed_range_intCast : IsClosed (Set.range ((↑) : ℤ → ℂ)) :=
Complex.closedEmbedding_intCast.isClosed_range
| lemma isOpen_compl_range_intCast : IsOpen (Set.range ((↑) : ℤ → ℂ))ᶜ :=
Complex.isClosed_range_intCast.isOpen_compl
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean | 374 | 376 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Filippo A. E. Nuccio Mortarino Majno di Capriglio. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Filippo A. E. Nuccio, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Path
/-!
# H-spaces
This file defines H-spaces mainly following the approach proposed by Serre in his paper
*Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés*. The idea beneath `H-spaces` is that they are topological
spaces with a binary operation `⋀ : X → X → X` that is a homotopic-theoretic weakening of an
operation what would make `X` into a topological monoid.
In particular, there exists a "neutral element" `e : X` such that `fun x ↦e ⋀ x` and
`fun x ↦ x ⋀ e` are homotopic to the identity on `X`, see
[the Wikipedia page of H-spaces](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-space).
Some notable properties of `H-spaces` are
* Their fundamental group is always abelian (by the same argument for topological groups);
* Their cohomology ring comes equipped with a structure of a Hopf-algebra;
* The loop space based at every `x : X` carries a structure of an `H-spaces`.
## Main Results
* Every topological group `G` is an `H-space` using its operation `* : G → G → G` (this is already
true if `G` has an instance of a `MulOneClass` and `ContinuousMul`);
* Given two `H-spaces` `X` and `Y`, their product is again an `H`-space. We show in an example that
starting with two topological groups `G, G'`, the `H`-space structure on `G × G'` is definitionally
equal to the product of `H-space` structures on `G` and `G'`.
* The loop space based at every `x : X` carries a structure of an `H-spaces`.
## To Do
* Prove that for every `NormedAddTorsor Z` and every `z : Z`, the operation
`fun x y ↦ midpoint x y` defines an `H-space` structure with `z` as a "neutral element".
* Prove that `S^0`, `S^1`, `S^3` and `S^7` are the unique spheres that are `H-spaces`, where the
first three inherit the structure because they are topological groups (they are Lie groups,
actually), isomorphic to the invertible elements in `ℤ`, in `ℂ` and in the quaternion; and the
fourth from the fact that `S^7` coincides with the octonions of norm 1 (it is not a group, in
particular, only has an instance of `MulOneClass`).
## References
* [J.-P. Serre, *Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés. Applications*,
Ann. of Math (2) 1951, 54, 425–505][serre1951]
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped unitInterval
open Path ContinuousMap Set.Icc TopologicalSpace
/-- A topological space `X` is an H-space if it behaves like a (potentially non-associative)
topological group, but where the axioms for a group only hold up to homotopy.
-/
class HSpace (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] where
hmul : C(X × X, X)
e : X
hmul_e_e : hmul (e, e) = e
eHmul :
(hmul.comp <| (const X e).prodMk <| ContinuousMap.id X).HomotopyRel (ContinuousMap.id X) {e}
hmulE :
(hmul.comp <| (ContinuousMap.id X).prodMk <| const X e).HomotopyRel (ContinuousMap.id X) {e}
/-- The binary operation `hmul` on an `H`-space -/
scoped[HSpaces] notation x "⋀" y => HSpace.hmul (x, y)
open HSpaces
instance HSpace.prod (X : Type u) (Y : Type v) [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [HSpace X]
[HSpace Y] : HSpace (X × Y) where
hmul := ⟨fun p => (p.1.1 ⋀ p.2.1, p.1.2 ⋀ p.2.2), by fun_prop⟩
e := (HSpace.e, HSpace.e)
hmul_e_e := by
simp only [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, Prod.mk_inj]
exact ⟨HSpace.hmul_e_e, HSpace.hmul_e_e⟩
eHmul := by
let G : I × X × Y → X × Y := fun p => (HSpace.eHmul (p.1, p.2.1), HSpace.eHmul (p.1, p.2.2))
have hG : Continuous G := by fun_prop
use! ⟨G, hG⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.eHmul.1.2 x) (HSpace.eHmul.1.2 y)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.eHmul.1.3 x) (HSpace.eHmul.1.3 y)
· rintro t ⟨x, y⟩ h
replace h := Prod.mk_inj.mp h
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.eHmul.2 t x h.1) (HSpace.eHmul.2 t y h.2)
hmulE := by
let G : I × X × Y → X × Y := fun p => (HSpace.hmulE (p.1, p.2.1), HSpace.hmulE (p.1, p.2.2))
have hG : Continuous G := by fun_prop
use! ⟨G, hG⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.hmulE.1.2 x) (HSpace.hmulE.1.2 y)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.hmulE.1.3 x) (HSpace.hmulE.1.3 y)
· rintro t ⟨x, y⟩ h
replace h := Prod.mk_inj.mp h
exact Prod.ext (HSpace.hmulE.2 t x h.1) (HSpace.hmulE.2 t y h.2)
namespace IsTopologicalGroup
/-- The definition `toHSpace` is not an instance because its additive version would
lead to a diamond since a topological field would inherit two `HSpace` structures, one from the
`MulOneClass` and one from the `AddZeroClass`. In the case of a group, we make
`IsTopologicalGroup.hSpace` an instance." -/
@[to_additive
"The definition `toHSpace` is not an instance because it comes together with a
multiplicative version which would lead to a diamond since a topological field would inherit
two `HSpace` structures, one from the `MulOneClass` and one from the `AddZeroClass`.
In the case of an additive group, we make `IsTopologicalAddGroup.hSpace` an instance."]
def toHSpace (M : Type u) [MulOneClass M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] : HSpace M where
hmul := ⟨Function.uncurry Mul.mul, continuous_mul⟩
e := 1
hmul_e_e := one_mul 1
eHmul := (HomotopyRel.refl _ _).cast rfl (by ext1; apply one_mul)
hmulE := (HomotopyRel.refl _ _).cast rfl (by ext1; apply mul_one)
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 600) hSpace (G : Type u) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] : HSpace G :=
toHSpace G
theorem one_eq_hSpace_e {G : Type u} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] :
(1 : G) = HSpace.e :=
rfl
/- In the following example we see that the H-space structure on the product of two topological
groups is definitionally equally to the product H-space-structure of the two groups. -/
example {G G' : Type u} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G']
[Group G'] [IsTopologicalGroup G'] : IsTopologicalGroup.hSpace (G × G') = HSpace.prod G G' := by
simp only [HSpace.prod]
rfl
end IsTopologicalGroup
namespace unitInterval
/-- `qRight` is analogous to the function `Q` defined on p. 475 of [serre1951] that helps proving
continuity of `delayReflRight`. -/
def qRight (p : I × I) : I :=
Set.projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (2 * p.1 / (1 + p.2))
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuous_qRight : Continuous qRight :=
continuous_projIcc.comp <|
Continuous.div (by fun_prop) (by fun_prop) fun _ ↦ (add_pos zero_lt_one).ne'
theorem qRight_zero_left (θ : I) : qRight (0, θ) = 0 :=
Set.projIcc_of_le_left _ <| by simp only [coe_zero, mul_zero, zero_div, le_refl]
theorem qRight_one_left (θ : I) : qRight (1, θ) = 1 :=
Set.projIcc_of_right_le _ <|
(le_div_iff₀ <| add_pos zero_lt_one).2 <| by
dsimp only
rw [coe_one, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm, ← one_add_one_eq_two]
simp only [add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_one _
theorem qRight_zero_right (t : I) :
(qRight (t, 0) : ℝ) = if (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then (2 : ℝ) * t else 1 := by
simp only [qRight, coe_zero, add_zero, div_one]
split_ifs
· rw [Set.projIcc_of_mem _ ((mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 _)]
refine ⟨t.2.1, ?_⟩
tauto
· rw [(Set.projIcc_eq_right _).2]
· linarith
· exact zero_lt_one
theorem qRight_one_right (t : I) : qRight (t, 1) = t :=
Eq.trans (by rw [qRight]; norm_num) <| Set.projIcc_val zero_le_one _
end unitInterval
namespace Path
open unitInterval
variable {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] {x y : X}
/-- This is the function analogous to the one on p. 475 of [serre1951], defining a homotopy from
the product path `γ ∧ e` to `γ`. -/
def delayReflRight (θ : I) (γ : Path x y) : Path x y where
toFun t := γ (qRight (t, θ))
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
source' := by
rw [qRight_zero_left, γ.source]
target' := by
rw [qRight_one_left, γ.target]
theorem continuous_delayReflRight : Continuous fun p : I × Path x y => delayReflRight p.1 p.2 :=
continuous_uncurry_iff.mp <|
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_fst).eval <|
continuous_qRight.comp <| continuous_snd.prodMk <| continuous_fst.comp continuous_fst
theorem delayReflRight_zero (γ : Path x y) : delayReflRight 0 γ = γ.trans (Path.refl y) := by
ext t
| simp only [delayReflRight, trans_apply, refl_extend, Path.coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply,
refl_apply]
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/HSpaces.lean | 205 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-!
# Determinant of a matrix
This file defines the determinant of a matrix, `Matrix.det`, and its essential properties.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.det`: the determinant of a square matrix, as a sum over permutations
- `Matrix.detRowAlternating`: the determinant, as an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix
## Main results
- `det_mul`: the determinant of `A * B` is the product of determinants
- `det_zero_of_row_eq`: the determinant is zero if there is a repeated row
- `det_block_diagonal`: the determinant of a block diagonal matrix is a product
of the blocks' determinants
## Implementation notes
It is possible to configure `simp` to compute determinants. See the file
`MathlibTest/matrix.lean` for some examples.
-/
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
/-- `det` is an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix. -/
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
/-- The determinant of a matrix given by the Leibniz formula. -/
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
theorem det_eq_detp_sub_detp (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = M.detp 1 - M.detp (-1) := by
rw [det_apply, ← Equiv.sum_comp (Equiv.inv (Perm n)), ← ofSign_disjUnion, sum_disjUnion]
simp_rw [inv_apply, sign_inv, sub_eq_add_neg, detp, ← sum_neg_distrib]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) <;>
rw [mem_ofSign.mp hσ, ← Equiv.prod_comp σ] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
obtain ⟨x, h3⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2)
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
/-- If `n` has only one element, the determinant of an `n` by `n` matrix is just that element.
Although `Unique` implies `DecidableEq` and `Fintype`, the instances might
not be syntactically equal. Thus, we need to fill in the args explicitly. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ = ∑ p : n → n with Bijective p, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
refine (sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij ↦ det_mul_aux ?_).symm
simpa only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
/-- The determinant of a matrix, as a monoid homomorphism. -/
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
/-- On square matrices, `mul_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_left_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_right_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M.val * N * M⁻¹.val) = det N := by
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj' (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M⁻¹.val * N * ↑M.val) = det N :=
det_units_conj M⁻¹ N
/-- Transposing a matrix preserves the determinant. -/
| @[simp]
theorem det_transpose (M : Matrix n n R) : Mᵀ.det = M.det := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 199 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
end Rec
open scoped Relator in
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, r (f (castSucc i)) (f i.succ) := by
constructor
· intro H i
exact H i.castSucc_lt_succ
· refine fun H i => Fin.induction (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp [le_def] at h
· intro j ihj hij
rw [← le_castSucc_iff] at hij
obtain hij | hij := (le_def.1 hij).eq_or_lt
· obtain rfl := Fin.ext hij
exact H _
· exact _root_.trans (ihj hij) (H j)
section AddGroup
open Nat Int
/-- Negation on `Fin n` -/
instance neg (n : ℕ) : Neg (Fin n) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩⟩
theorem neg_def (a : Fin n) : -a = ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩ := rfl
protected theorem coe_neg (a : Fin n) : ((-a : Fin n) : ℕ) = (n - a) % n :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero (n : Fin 1) : n = 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma eq_one_of_ne_zero (i : Fin 2) (hi : i ≠ 0) : i = 1 := by fin_omega
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias eq_one_of_neq_zero := eq_one_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : Fin (n + 1)) = n := by
cases n
· simp
rw [Fin.coe_neg, Fin.val_one, Nat.add_one_sub_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
constructor
theorem last_sub (i : Fin (n + 1)) : last n - i = Fin.rev i :=
Fin.ext <| by rw [coe_sub_iff_le.2 i.le_last, val_last, val_rev, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a < b) : a + 1 ≤ b := by
cases n <;> fin_omega
theorem exists_eq_add_of_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (h : a ≤ b) : ∃ k ≤ b, b = a + k := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (b : ℕ) = a + k := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
have hkb : k ≤ b := by omega
refine ⟨⟨k, hkb.trans_lt b.is_lt⟩, hkb, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, ← hk, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.is_lt]
theorem exists_eq_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a < b) :
∃ k < b, k + 1 ≤ b ∧ b = a + k + 1 := by
cases n
· omega
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (b : ℕ) = a + k + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt h
have hkb : k < b := by omega
refine ⟨⟨k, hkb.trans b.is_lt⟩, hkb, by fin_omega, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_add, ← hk, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.is_lt]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,426 | 1,426 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,037 | 2,037 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Balanced
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.LiftingProperties.Basic
/-!
# Strong epimorphisms
In this file, we define strong epimorphisms. A strong epimorphism is an epimorphism `f`
which has the (unique) left lifting property with respect to monomorphisms. Similarly,
a strong monomorphisms in a monomorphism which has the (unique) right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms.
## Main results
Besides the definition, we show that
* the composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism,
* if `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`,
* if `f` is both a strong epimorphism and a monomorphism, then it is an isomorphism
We also define classes `StrongMonoCategory` and `StrongEpiCategory` for categories in which
every monomorphism or epimorphism is strong, and deduce that these categories are balanced.
## TODO
Show that the dual of a strong epimorphism is a strong monomorphism, and vice versa.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 1*][borceux-vol1]
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {P Q : C}
/-- A strong epimorphism `f` is an epimorphism which has the left lifting property
with respect to monomorphisms. -/
class StrongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The epimorphism condition on `f` -/
epi : Epi f
/-- The left lifting property with respect to all monomorphism -/
llp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Mono z], HasLiftingProperty f z
theorem StrongEpi.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Epi f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y)
(_ : Mono z) (u : P ⟶ X) (v : Q ⟶ Y) (sq : CommSq u f z v), sq.HasLift) :
StrongEpi f :=
{ epi := inferInstance
llp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩ }
/-- A strong monomorphism `f` is a monomorphism which has the right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms. -/
class StrongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The monomorphism condition on `f` -/
mono : Mono f
/-- The right lifting property with respect to all epimorphisms -/
rlp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Epi z], HasLiftingProperty z f
theorem StrongMono.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Mono f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y) (_ : Epi z) (u : X ⟶ P)
(v : Y ⟶ Q) (sq : CommSq u z f v), sq.HasLift) : StrongMono f where
mono := inferInstance
rlp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩
attribute [instance 100] StrongEpi.llp
attribute [instance 100] StrongMono.rlp
instance (priority := 100) epi_of_strongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongEpi f] : Epi f :=
StrongEpi.epi
instance (priority := 100) mono_of_strongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongMono f] : Mono f :=
StrongMono.mono
section
variable {R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R)
/-- The composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism. -/
theorem strongEpi_comp [StrongEpi f] [StrongEpi g] : StrongEpi (f ≫ g) :=
{ epi := epi_comp _ _
llp := by
intros
infer_instance }
/-- The composition of two strong monomorphisms is a strong monomorphism. -/
theorem strongMono_comp [StrongMono f] [StrongMono g] : StrongMono (f ≫ g) :=
{ mono := mono_comp _ _
rlp := by
intros
infer_instance }
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`. -/
theorem strongEpi_of_strongEpi [StrongEpi (f ≫ g)] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := epi_of_epi f g
llp := fun {X Y} z _ => by
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : (f ≫ u) ≫ z = (f ≫ g) ≫ v := by simp only [Category.assoc, sq.w]
exact
CommSq.HasLift.mk'
⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by
simp only [← cancel_mono z, Category.assoc, CommSq.fac_right, sq.w], by simp⟩ }
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong monomorphism, then so is `f`. -/
theorem strongMono_of_strongMono [StrongMono (f ≫ g)] : StrongMono f :=
{ mono := mono_of_mono f g
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
intros
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : u ≫ f ≫ g = z ≫ v ≫ g := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker sq.w, Category.assoc]
exact CommSq.HasLift.mk' ⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by simp, by simp [← cancel_epi z, sq.w]⟩ }
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong epimorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongEpi_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongEpi f where
epi := by infer_instance
llp {_ _} _ := HasLiftingProperty.of_left_iso _ _
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong monomorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongMono_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongMono f where
mono := by infer_instance
rlp {_ _} _ := HasLiftingProperty.of_right_iso _ _
theorem StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongEpi f] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
infer_instance
llp := fun {X Y} z => by
intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_left e z }
theorem StrongMono.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongMono f] : StrongMono g :=
{ mono := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
infer_instance
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
| intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_right z e }
theorem StrongEpi.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : StrongEpi f ↔ StrongEpi g := by
constructor <;> intro
exacts [StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e, StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e.symm]
theorem StrongMono.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/StrongEpi.lean | 150 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
| but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 494 | 495 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
| simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 258 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
/-! # sublists
`List.Sublists` gives a list of all (not necessarily contiguous) sublists of a list.
This file contains basic results on this function.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Nat
namespace List
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper definition for `sublists'` -/
def sublists'Aux (a : α) (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r₁.foldl (init := r₂) fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl (a : α) : ∀ (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = ((r₁.toArray).foldl (init := r₂.toArray)
(fun r l => r.push (a :: l))).toList := by
intro r₁ r₂
rw [sublists'Aux, Array.foldl_toList]
have := List.foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => r.push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]) (l := r₁) (init := r₂.toArray) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux (l : List α) :
sublists' l = l.foldr (fun a r => sublists'Aux a r r) [[]] := by
simp only [sublists', sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl]
rw [← List.foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_map (a : α) (r₁ : List (List α)) : ∀ (r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = r₂ ++ map (cons a) r₁ :=
List.reverseRecOn r₁ (fun _ => by simp [sublists'Aux]) fun r₁ l ih r₂ => by
rw [map_append, map_singleton, ← append_assoc, ← ih, sublists'Aux, foldl_append, foldl]
simp [sublists'Aux]
@[simp 900]
theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) := by
simp [sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux, foldr_cons, sublists'Aux_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists' {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t := by
induction' t with a t IH generalizing s
· simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with (h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩)
· exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h
· exact h.cons_cons _
· obtain - | ⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : List α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
simp +arith only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l,
length_map, length, Nat.pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper function for `sublists` -/
def sublistsAux (a : α) (r : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r.foldl (init := []) fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]
theorem sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) =>
(r.toArray.foldl (init := #[])
fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l)).toList := by
funext a r
simp only [sublistsAux, Array.foldl_toList, Array.mkEmpty]
have := foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]) (l := r) (init := #[]) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublistsAux_eq_flatMap :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) => r.flatMap fun l => [l, a :: l] :=
funext fun a => funext fun r =>
List.reverseRecOn r
(by simp [sublistsAux])
(fun r l ih => by
rw [flatMap_append, ← ih, flatMap_singleton, sublistsAux, foldl_append]
simp [sublistsAux])
@[csimp] theorem sublists_eq_sublistsFast : @sublists = @sublistsFast := by
ext α l : 2
trans l.foldr sublistsAux [[]]
· rw [sublistsAux_eq_flatMap, sublists]
· simp only [sublistsFast, sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl, Array.foldr_toList]
rw [← foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (sublists l₂) >>= (fun x => (sublists l₁).map (· ++ x)) := by
simp only [sublists, foldr_append]
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons a l₁ ih =>
rw [foldr_cons, ih]
simp [List.flatMap, flatten_flatten, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists (a :: l) = sublists l >>= (fun x => [x, a :: x]) :=
show sublists ([a] ++ l) = _ by
rw [sublists_append]
simp only [sublists_singleton, map_cons, bind_eq_flatMap, nil_append, cons_append, map_nil]
@[simp]
theorem sublists_concat (l : List α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (fun x => x ++ [a]) (sublists l) := by
rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_flatMap, flatMap_cons, flatMap_cons, flatMap_nil,
map_id'' append_nil, append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : List α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) := by
induction' l with hd tl ih <;> [rfl;
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_flatMap, map_map, flatMap_cons, append_nil, flatMap_nil,
Function.comp_def]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : List α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : List α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id'' reverse_reverse, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : List α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t := by
rw [← reverse_sublist, ← mem_sublists', sublists'_reverse,
mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists (l : List α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_pure_sublist_sublists (l : List α) : map pure l <+ sublists l := by
induction' l using reverseRecOn with l a ih <;> simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]
· simp only [sublists_nil, sublist_cons_self]
exact ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 <|
singleton_sublist.2 <| mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by rfl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 ih)
/-! ### sublistsLen -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
`f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublistsLenAux : ℕ → List α → (List α → β) → List β → List β
| 0, _, f, r => f [] :: r
| _ + 1, [], _, r => r
| n + 1, a :: l, f, r => sublistsLenAux (n + 1) l f (sublistsLenAux n l (f ∘ List.cons a) r)
|
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sublists.lean | 188 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ColimitLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Filtered
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
/-!
# Filtered colimits commute with finite limits.
We show that for a functor `F : J × K ⥤ Type v`, when `J` is finite and `K` is filtered,
the universal morphism `colimitLimitToLimitColimit F` comparing the
colimit (over `K`) of the limits (over `J`) with the limit of the colimits is an isomorphism.
(In fact, to prove that it is injective only requires that `J` has finitely many objects.)
## References
* Borceux, Handbook of categorical algebra 1, Theorem 2.13.4
* [Stacks: Filtered colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002W)
-/
-- Various pieces of algebra that have previously been spuriously imported here:
assert_not_exists map_ne_zero Field
-- TODO: We should morally be able to strengthen this to `assert_not_exists GroupWithZero`, but
-- finiteness currently relies on more algebra than it needs.
universe w v₁ v₂ v u₁ u₂ u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits.Types
CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.FilteredColimit
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
section
variable {J : Type u₁} {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] [Small.{v} K]
/-- `(G ⋙ lim).obj j` = `limit (G.obj j)` definitionally, so this
is just a variant of `limit_ext'`. -/
@[ext] lemma comp_lim_obj_ext {j : J} {G : J ⥤ K ⥤ Type v} (x y : (G ⋙ lim).obj j)
(w : ∀ (k : K), limit.π (G.obj j) k x = limit.π (G.obj j) k y) : x = y :=
limit_ext _ x y w
variable (F : J × K ⥤ Type v)
open CategoryTheory.Prod
variable [IsFiltered K]
section
/-!
Injectivity doesn't need that we have finitely many morphisms in `J`,
only that there are finitely many objects.
-/
variable [Finite J]
/-- This follows this proof from
* Borceux, Handbook of categorical algebra 1, Theorem 2.13.4
-/
theorem colimitLimitToLimitColimit_injective :
Function.Injective (colimitLimitToLimitColimit F) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype J
-- Suppose we have two terms `x y` in the colimit (over `K`) of the limits (over `J`),
-- and that these have the same image under `colimitLimitToLimitColimit F`.
intro x y h
-- These elements of the colimit have representatives somewhere:
obtain ⟨kx, x, rfl⟩ := jointly_surjective' x
obtain ⟨ky, y, rfl⟩ := jointly_surjective' y
dsimp at x y
-- Since the images of `x` and `y` are equal in a limit, they are equal componentwise
-- (indexed by `j : J`),
replace h := fun j => congr_arg (limit.π (curry.obj F ⋙ colim) j) h
-- and they are equations in a filtered colimit,
-- so for each `j` we have some place `k j` to the right of both `kx` and `ky`
simp? [colimit_eq_iff] at h says
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, colim_obj, ι_colimitLimitToLimitColimit_π_apply,
colimit_eq_iff, curry_obj_obj_obj, curry_obj_obj_map] at h
let k j := (h j).choose
let f : ∀ j, kx ⟶ k j := fun j => (h j).choose_spec.choose
let g : ∀ j, ky ⟶ k j := fun j => (h j).choose_spec.choose_spec.choose
-- where the images of the components of the representatives become equal:
have w :
∀ j, F.map ((𝟙 j, f j) :
(j, kx) ⟶ (j, k j)) (limit.π ((curry.obj (swap K J ⋙ F)).obj kx) j x) =
F.map ((𝟙 j, g j) : (j, ky) ⟶ (j, k j))
(limit.π ((curry.obj (swap K J ⋙ F)).obj ky) j y) :=
fun j => (h j).choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec
-- We now use that `K` is filtered, picking some point to the right of all these
-- morphisms `f j` and `g j`.
let O : Finset K := Finset.univ.image k ∪ {kx, ky}
have kxO : kx ∈ O := Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inr (by simp))
have kyO : ky ∈ O := Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inr (by simp))
have kjO : ∀ j, k j ∈ O := fun j => Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inl (by simp))
let H : Finset (Σ' (X Y : K) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) :=
(Finset.univ.image fun j : J =>
⟨kx, k j, kxO, Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inl (by simp)), f j⟩) ∪
Finset.univ.image fun j : J => ⟨ky, k j, kyO, Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inl (by simp)), g j⟩
obtain ⟨S, T, W⟩ := IsFiltered.sup_exists O H
have fH : ∀ j, (⟨kx, k j, kxO, kjO j, f j⟩ : Σ' (X Y : K) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) ∈ H :=
fun j =>
Finset.mem_union.mpr
(Or.inl
(by
simp only [true_and, Finset.mem_univ, eq_self_iff_true, exists_prop_of_true,
Finset.mem_image, heq_iff_eq]
refine ⟨j, ?_⟩
simp only [heq_iff_eq] ))
have gH :
∀ j, (⟨ky, k j, kyO, kjO j, g j⟩ : Σ' (X Y : K) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) ∈ H :=
fun j =>
Finset.mem_union.mpr
(Or.inr
(by
simp only [true_and, Finset.mem_univ, eq_self_iff_true, exists_prop_of_true,
Finset.mem_image, heq_iff_eq]
refine ⟨j, ?_⟩
simp only [heq_iff_eq]))
-- Our goal is now an equation between equivalence classes of representatives of a colimit,
-- and so it suffices to show those representative become equal somewhere, in particular at `S`.
apply colimit_sound' (T kxO) (T kyO)
-- We can check if two elements of a limit (in `Type`)
-- are equal by comparing them componentwise.
ext j
-- Now it's just a calculation using `W` and `w`.
simp only [Functor.comp_map, Limit.map_π_apply, curry_obj_map_app, swap_map]
rw [← W _ _ (fH j), ← W _ _ (gH j)]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): had to add `Limit.map_π_apply`
-- (which was un-tagged simp since "simp can prove it")
simp [Limit.map_π_apply, w]
end
end
section
variable {J : Type u₁} {K : Type u₂} [SmallCategory J] [Category.{v₂} K] [Small.{v} K]
variable [FinCategory J]
variable (F : J × K ⥤ Type v)
open CategoryTheory.Prod
variable [IsFiltered K]
/-- This follows this proof from
* Borceux, Handbook of categorical algebra 1, Theorem 2.13.4
although with different names.
-/
theorem colimitLimitToLimitColimit_surjective :
Function.Surjective (colimitLimitToLimitColimit F) := by
classical
-- We begin with some element `x` in the limit (over J) over the colimits (over K),
| intro x
-- This consists of some coherent family of elements in the various colimits,
-- and so our first task is to pick representatives of these elements.
have z := fun j => jointly_surjective' (limit.π (curry.obj F ⋙ Limits.colim) j x)
-- `k : J ⟶ K` records where the representative of the
-- element in the `j`-th element of `x` lives
let k : J → K := fun j => (z j).choose
-- `y j : F.obj (j, k j)` is the representative
let y : ∀ j, F.obj (j, k j) := fun j => (z j).choose_spec.choose
-- and we record that these representatives, when mapped back into the relevant colimits,
-- are actually the components of `x`.
have e : ∀ j,
colimit.ι ((curry.obj F).obj j) (k j) (y j) = limit.π (curry.obj F ⋙ Limits.colim) j x :=
fun j => (z j).choose_spec.choose_spec
clear_value k y
-- A little tidying up of things we no longer need.
clear z
-- As a first step, we use that `K` is filtered to pick some point `k' : K` above all the `k j`
let k' : K := IsFiltered.sup (Finset.univ.image k) ∅
-- and name the morphisms as `g j : k j ⟶ k'`.
have g : ∀ j, k j ⟶ k' := fun j => IsFiltered.toSup (Finset.univ.image k) ∅ (by simp)
clear_value k'
-- Recalling that the components of `x`, which are indexed by `j : J`, are "coherent",
-- in other words preserved by morphisms in the `J` direction,
-- we see that for any morphism `f : j ⟶ j'` in `J`,
-- the images of `y j` and `y j'`, when mapped to `F.obj (j', k')` respectively by
-- `(f, g j)` and `(𝟙 j', g j')`, both represent the same element in the colimit.
have w :
∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'),
colimit.ι ((curry.obj F).obj j') k' (F.map ((𝟙 j', g j') : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', k')) (y j')) =
colimit.ι ((curry.obj F).obj j') k' (F.map ((f, g j) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k')) (y j)) := by
intro j j' f
have t : (f, g j) =
(((f, 𝟙 (k j)) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k j)) ≫ (𝟙 j', g j) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k')) := by
simp only [id_comp, comp_id, prod_comp]
erw [Colimit.w_apply, t, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, Colimit.w_apply, e,
← Limit.w_apply.{u₁, v, u₁} f, ← e]
simp only [Functor.comp_map, Types.Colimit.ι_map_apply, curry_obj_map_app]
-- Because `K` is filtered, we can restate this as saying that
-- for each such `f`, there is some place to the right of `k'`
-- where these images of `y j` and `y j'` become equal.
simp_rw [colimit_eq_iff] at w
-- We take a moment to restate `w` more conveniently.
let kf : ∀ {j j'} (_ : j ⟶ j'), K := fun f => (w f).choose
let gf : ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), k' ⟶ kf f := fun f => (w f).choose_spec.choose
let hf : ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), k' ⟶ kf f := fun f =>
(w f).choose_spec.choose_spec.choose
have wf :
∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'),
F.map ((𝟙 j', g j' ≫ gf f) : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', kf f)) (y j') =
F.map ((f, g j ≫ hf f) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', kf f)) (y j) :=
fun {j j'} f => by
have q :
((curry.obj F).obj j').map (gf f) (F.map ((𝟙 j', g j') : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', k')) (y j')) =
((curry.obj F).obj j').map (hf f) (F.map ((f, g j) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k')) (y j)) :=
(w f).choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec
dsimp only [curry_obj_obj_map, curry_obj_obj_map] at q
simp_rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, CategoryStruct.comp] at q
convert q <;> simp only [comp_id]
clear_value kf gf hf
-- and clean up some things that are no longer needed.
clear w
-- We're now ready to use the fact that `K` is filtered a second time,
-- picking some place to the right of all of
-- the morphisms `gf f : k' ⟶ kh f` and `hf f : k' ⟶ kf f`.
-- At this point we're relying on there being only finitely morphisms in `J`.
let O :=
(Finset.univ.biUnion fun j => Finset.univ.biUnion fun j' => Finset.univ.image
(@kf j j')) ∪ {k'}
have kfO : ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), kf f ∈ O := fun {j} {j'} f =>
Finset.mem_union.mpr
(Or.inl
(Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j, Finset.mem_univ j,
Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j', Finset.mem_univ j',
Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨f, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩⟩⟩))
have k'O : k' ∈ O := Finset.mem_union.mpr (Or.inr (Finset.mem_singleton.mpr rfl))
let H : Finset (Σ' (X Y : K) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) :=
Finset.univ.biUnion fun j : J =>
Finset.univ.biUnion fun j' : J =>
Finset.univ.biUnion fun f : j ⟶ j' =>
{⟨k', kf f, k'O, kfO f, gf f⟩, ⟨k', kf f, k'O, kfO f, hf f⟩}
obtain ⟨k'', i', s'⟩ := IsFiltered.sup_exists O H
-- We then restate this slightly more conveniently, as a family of morphism `i f : kf f ⟶ k''`,
-- satisfying `gf f ≫ i f = hf f' ≫ i f'`.
let i : ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), kf f ⟶ k'' := fun {j} {j'} f => i' (kfO f)
have s : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ j₄} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (f' : j₃ ⟶ j₄), gf f ≫ i f = hf f' ≫ i f' := by
intros j₁ j₂ j₃ j₄ f f'
rw [s', s']
· exact k'O
· exact Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j₃, Finset.mem_univ _,
Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j₄, Finset.mem_univ _,
Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨f', Finset.mem_univ _, by
-- This works by `simp`, but has very high variation in heartbeats.
rw [Finset.mem_insert, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq,
PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, eq_self, true_and, eq_self,
true_and, eq_self, true_and, eq_self, true_and, Finset.mem_singleton, eq_self,
or_true]
trivial⟩⟩⟩
· exact Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j₁, Finset.mem_univ _,
Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨j₂, Finset.mem_univ _,
Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨f, Finset.mem_univ _, by
-- This works by `simp`, but has very high variation in heartbeats.
rw [Finset.mem_insert, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq,
PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, eq_self, true_and, eq_self,
true_and, eq_self, true_and, eq_self, true_and, Finset.mem_singleton, eq_self,
true_or]
trivial⟩⟩⟩
clear_value i
clear s' i' H kfO k'O O
-- We're finally ready to construct the pre-image, and verify it really maps to `x`.
-- ⊢ ∃ a, colimitLimitToLimitColimit F a = x
fconstructor
· -- We construct the pre-image (which, recall is meant to be a point
-- in the colimit (over `K`) of the limits (over `J`)) via a representative at `k''`.
apply colimit.ι (curry.obj (swap K J ⋙ F) ⋙ Limits.lim) k'' _
dsimp
-- This representative is meant to be an element of a limit,
-- so we need to construct a family of elements in `F.obj (j, k'')` for varying `j`,
-- then show that are coherent with respect to morphisms in the `j` direction.
apply Limit.mk
swap
·-- We construct the elements as the images of the `y j`.
exact fun j => F.map (⟨𝟙 j, g j ≫ gf (𝟙 j) ≫ i (𝟙 j)⟩ : (j, k j) ⟶ (j, k'')) (y j)
· -- After which it's just a calculation, using `s` and `wf`, to see they are coherent.
dsimp
intro j j' f
simp only [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, prod_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
calc
F.map ((f, g j ≫ gf (𝟙 j) ≫ i (𝟙 j)) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k'')) (y j) =
F.map ((f, g j ≫ hf f ≫ i f) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', k'')) (y j) := by
rw [s (𝟙 j) f]
_ =
F.map ((𝟙 j', i f) : (j', kf f) ⟶ (j', k''))
(F.map ((f, g j ≫ hf f) : (j, k j) ⟶ (j', kf f)) (y j)) := by
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, prod_comp, comp_id, assoc]
_ =
F.map ((𝟙 j', i f) : (j', kf f) ⟶ (j', k''))
(F.map ((𝟙 j', g j' ≫ gf f) : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', kf f)) (y j')) := by
rw [← wf f]
_ = F.map ((𝟙 j', g j' ≫ gf f ≫ i f) : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', k'')) (y j') := by
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, prod_comp, id_comp, assoc]
_ = F.map ((𝟙 j', g j' ≫ gf (𝟙 j') ≫ i (𝟙 j')) : (j', k j') ⟶ (j', k'')) (y j') := by
rw [s f (𝟙 j'), ← s (𝟙 j') (𝟙 j')]
-- Finally we check that this maps to `x`.
· -- We can do this componentwise:
apply limit_ext
intro j
-- and as each component is an equation in a colimit, we can verify it by
-- pointing out the morphism which carries one representative to the other:
simp only [id, ← e, Limits.ι_colimitLimitToLimitColimit_π_apply,
colimit_eq_iff, Bifunctor.map_id_comp, types_comp_apply, curry_obj_obj_map,
Functor.comp_obj, colim_obj, Limit.π_mk]
refine ⟨k'', 𝟙 k'', g j ≫ gf (𝟙 j) ≫ i (𝟙 j), ?_⟩
-- Porting note: the lean 3 proof finished with
-- `simp only [Bifunctor.map_id_comp, types_comp_apply, Bifunctor.map_id, types_id_apply]`
-- which doesn't work; the corresponding `rw` works fine:
rw [Bifunctor.map_id_comp, Bifunctor.map_id_comp, types_comp_apply, types_comp_apply,
Bifunctor.map_id, types_id_apply]
instance colimitLimitToLimitColimit_isIso : IsIso (colimitLimitToLimitColimit F) :=
(isIso_iff_bijective _).mpr
⟨colimitLimitToLimitColimit_injective F, colimitLimitToLimitColimit_surjective F⟩
instance colimitLimitToLimitColimitCone_iso (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ Type v) :
IsIso (colimitLimitToLimitColimitCone F) := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/FilteredColimitCommutesFiniteLimit.lean | 165 | 329 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.CircleMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### Facts about `circleMap`
-/
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
| rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 91 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Principal ordinals
We define principal or indecomposable ordinals, and we prove the standard properties about them.
## Main definitions and results
* `Principal`: A principal or indecomposable ordinal under some binary operation. We include 0 and
any other typically excluded edge cases for simplicity.
* `not_bddAbove_principal`: Principal ordinals (under any operation) are unbounded.
* `principal_add_iff_zero_or_omega0_opow`: The main characterization theorem for additive principal
ordinals.
* `principal_mul_iff_le_two_or_omega0_opow_opow`: The main characterization theorem for
multiplicative principal ordinals.
## TODO
* Prove that exponential principal ordinals are 0, 1, 2, ω, or epsilon numbers, i.e. fixed points
of `fun x ↦ ω ^ x`.
-/
universe u
open Order
namespace Ordinal
variable {a b c o : Ordinal.{u}}
section Arbitrary
variable {op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal}
/-! ### Principal ordinals -/
/-- An ordinal `o` is said to be principal or indecomposable under an operation when the set of
ordinals less than it is closed under that operation. In standard mathematical usage, this term is
almost exclusively used for additive and multiplicative principal ordinals.
For simplicity, we break usual convention and regard `0` as principal. -/
def Principal (op : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, a < o → b < o → op a b < o
theorem principal_swap_iff : Principal (Function.swap op) o ↔ Principal op o := by
constructor <;> exact fun h a b ha hb => h hb ha
theorem not_principal_iff : ¬ Principal op o ↔ ∃ a < o, ∃ b < o, o ≤ op a b := by
simp [Principal]
theorem principal_iff_of_monotone
(h₁ : ∀ a, Monotone (op a)) (h₂ : ∀ a, Monotone (Function.swap op a)) :
Principal op o ↔ ∀ a < o, op a a < o := by
use fun h a ha => h ha ha
intro H a b ha hb
obtain hab | hba := le_or_lt a b
· exact (h₂ b hab).trans_lt <| H b hb
· exact (h₁ a hba.le).trans_lt <| H a ha
theorem not_principal_iff_of_monotone
(h₁ : ∀ a, Monotone (op a)) (h₂ : ∀ a, Monotone (Function.swap op a)) :
¬ Principal op o ↔ ∃ a < o, o ≤ op a a := by
simp [principal_iff_of_monotone h₁ h₂]
theorem principal_zero : Principal op 0 := fun a _ h =>
(Ordinal.not_lt_zero a h).elim
@[simp]
theorem principal_one_iff : Principal op 1 ↔ op 0 0 = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a b ha hb => ?_⟩
| · rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
exact h zero_lt_one zero_lt_one
· rwa [lt_one_iff_zero, ha, hb] at *
theorem Principal.iterate_lt (hao : a < o) (ho : Principal op o) (n : ℕ) : (op a)^[n] a < o := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Principal.lean | 77 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Pointwise.Stabilizer
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-! # Blocks
Given `SMul G X`, an action of a type `G` on a type `X`, we define
- the predicate `MulAction.IsBlock G B` states that `B : Set X` is a block,
which means that the sets `g • B`, for `g ∈ G`, are equal or disjoint.
Under `Group G` and `MulAction G X`, this is equivalent to the classical
definition `MulAction.IsBlock.def_one`
- a bunch of lemmas that give examples of “trivial” blocks : ⊥, ⊤, singletons,
and non trivial blocks: orbit of the group, orbit of a normal subgroup…
The non-existence of nontrivial blocks is the definition of primitive actions.
## Results for actions on finite sets
- `MulAction.IsBlock.ncard_block_mul_ncard_orbit_eq` : The cardinality of a block
multiplied by the number of its translates is the cardinal of the ambient type
- `MulAction.IsBlock.eq_univ_of_card_lt` : a too large block is equal to `Set.univ`
- `MulAction.IsBlock.subsingleton_of_card_lt` : a too small block is a subsingleton
- `MulAction.IsBlock.of_subset` : the intersections of the translates of a finite subset
that contain a given point is a block
- `MulAction.BlockMem` : the type of blocks containing a given element
- `MulAction.BlockMem.instBoundedOrder` :
the type of blocks containing a given element is a bounded order.
## References
We follow [Wielandt-1964].
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
section orbits
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.eq_or_disjoint (a b : X) :
orbit G a = orbit G b ∨ Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b) := by
apply (em (Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b))).symm.imp _ id
simp +contextual
only [Set.not_disjoint_iff, ← orbit_eq_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp, eq_comm, implies_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.pairwiseDisjoint :
(Set.range fun x : X => orbit G x).PairwiseDisjoint id := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩ t ⟨y, rfl⟩ h
contrapose! h
exact (orbit.eq_or_disjoint x y).resolve_right h
/-- Orbits of an element form a partition -/
@[to_additive "Orbits of an element form a partition"]
theorem IsPartition.of_orbits :
Setoid.IsPartition (Set.range fun a : X => orbit G a) := by
apply orbit.pairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty
· intro x
exact ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_orbit_self x⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha : orbit G a = ∅⟩
exact (MulAction.orbit_nonempty a).ne_empty ha
end orbits
section SMul
variable (G : Type*) {X : Type*} [SMul G X] {B : Set X} {a : X}
-- Change terminology to IsFullyInvariant?
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g • B = B` for all `g : G`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g +ᵥ B = B` for all `g : G`."]
def IsFixedBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B = B
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g • B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
|
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Blocks.lean | 95 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Kevin Buzzard, Yaël Dillies, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Union
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
/-!
# Supremum independence
In this file, we define supremum independence of indexed sets. An indexed family `f : ι → α` is
sup-independent if, for all `a`, `f a` and the supremum of the rest are disjoint.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.SupIndep s f`: a family of elements `f` are supremum independent on the finite set `s`.
* `sSupIndep s`: a set of elements are supremum independent.
* `iSupIndep f`: a family of elements are supremum independent.
## Main statements
* In a distributive lattice, supremum independence is equivalent to pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.sSupIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.iSupIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* Otherwise, supremum independence is stronger than pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `sSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `iSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
## Implementation notes
For the finite version, we avoid the "obvious" definition
`∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f)` because `erase` would require decidable equality on
`ι`.
-/
variable {α β ι ι' : Type*}
/-! ### On lattices with a bottom element, via `Finset.sup` -/
namespace Finset
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum independence of finite sets. We avoid the "obvious" definition using `s.erase i`
because `erase` would require decidable equality on `ι`. -/
def SupIndep (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → i ∉ t → Disjoint (f i) (t.sup f)
variable {s t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {i : ι}
/-- The RHS looks like the definition of `iSupIndep`. -/
theorem supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] :
s.SupIndep f ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f) :=
⟨fun hs _ hi => hs (erase_subset _ _) hi (not_mem_erase _ _), fun hs _ ht i hi hit =>
(hs i hi).mono_right (sup_mono fun _ hj => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit, ht hj⟩)⟩
/-- If both the index type and the lattice have decidable equality,
then the `SupIndep` predicate is decidable.
TODO: speedup the definition and drop the `[DecidableEq ι]` assumption
by iterating over the pairs `(a, t)` such that `s = Finset.cons a t _`
using something like `List.eraseIdx`
or by generating both `f i` and `(s.erase i).sup f` in one loop over `s`.
Yet another possible optimization is to precompute partial suprema of `f`
over the inits and tails of the list representing `s`,
store them in 2 `Array`s,
then compute each `sup` in 1 operation. -/
instance [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq α] : Decidable (SupIndep s f) :=
have : ∀ i, Decidable (Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f)) := fun _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_iff.symm
decidable_of_iff _ supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase.symm
theorem SupIndep.subset (ht : t.SupIndep f) (h : s ⊆ t) : s.SupIndep f := fun _ hu _ hi =>
ht (hu.trans h) (h hi)
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_empty (f : ι → α) : (∅ : Finset ι).SupIndep f := fun _ _ a ha =>
(not_mem_empty a ha).elim
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_singleton (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ({i} : Finset ι).SupIndep f :=
fun s hs j hji hj => by
rw [eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton ⟨hs, fun h => hj (h hji)⟩, sup_empty]
exact disjoint_bot_right
theorem SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint (hs : s.SupIndep f) : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
sup_singleton.subst <| hs (singleton_subset_iff.2 hb) ha <| not_mem_singleton.2 hab
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias sup_indep.pairwise_disjoint := SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
theorem SupIndep.le_sup_iff (hs : s.SupIndep f) (hts : t ⊆ s) (hi : i ∈ s) (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥) :
f i ≤ t.sup f ↔ i ∈ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, le_sup⟩
by_contra hit
exact hf i (disjoint_self.1 <| (hs hts hi hit).mono_right h)
theorem SupIndep.antitone_fun {g : ι → α} (hle : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) (h : s.SupIndep g) :
s.SupIndep f := fun _t hts i his hit ↦
(h hts his hit).mono (hle i his) <| Finset.sup_mono_fun fun x hx ↦ hle x <| hts hx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias supIndep_antimono_fun := SupIndep.antitone_fun
protected theorem SupIndep.image [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → ι}
(hs : s.SupIndep (f ∘ g)) : (s.image g).SupIndep f := by
intro t ht i hi hit
rcases subset_image_iff.mp ht with ⟨t, hts, rfl⟩
rcases mem_image.mp hi with ⟨i, his, rfl⟩
rw [sup_image]
exact hs hts his (hit <| mem_image_of_mem _ ·)
theorem supIndep_map {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' ↪ ι} : (s.map g).SupIndep f ↔ s.SupIndep (f ∘ g) := by
refine ⟨fun hs t ht i hi hit => ?_, fun hs => ?_⟩
· rw [← sup_map]
exact hs (map_subset_map.2 ht) ((mem_map' _).2 hi) (by rwa [mem_map'])
· classical
rw [map_eq_image]
exact hs.image
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_pair [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f i) (f j) := by
suffices Disjoint (f i) (f j) → Disjoint (f j) ((Finset.erase {i, j} j).sup f) by
simpa [supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase, hij]
rw [pair_comm]
simp [hij.symm, disjoint_comm]
theorem supIndep_univ_bool (f : Bool → α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset Bool).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f false) (f true) :=
haveI : true ≠ false := by simp only [Ne, not_false_iff, reduceCtorEq]
(supIndep_pair this).trans disjoint_comm
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_univ_fin_two (f : Fin 2 → α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 2)).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f 0) (f 1) :=
have : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1 := by simp
supIndep_pair this
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_attach : (s.attach.SupIndep fun a => f a) ↔ s.SupIndep f := by
simpa [Finset.attach_map_val] using (supIndep_map (s := s.attach) (g := .subtype _)).symm
alias ⟨_, SupIndep.attach⟩ := supIndep_attach
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
theorem supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint : s.SupIndep f ↔ (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
⟨SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint, fun hs _ ht _ hi hit =>
Finset.disjoint_sup_right.2 fun _ hj => hs hi (ht hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit).symm⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.supIndep⟩ := supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint
/-- Bind operation for `SupIndep`. -/
protected theorem SupIndep.sup [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : s.SupIndep fun i => (g i).sup f) (hg : ∀ i' ∈ s, (g i').SupIndep f) :
(s.sup g).SupIndep f := by
simp_rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint] at hs hg ⊢
rw [sup_eq_biUnion, coe_biUnion]
exact hs.biUnion_finset hg
/-- Bind operation for `SupIndep`. -/
protected theorem SupIndep.biUnion [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : s.SupIndep fun i => (g i).sup f) (hg : ∀ i' ∈ s, (g i').SupIndep f) :
(s.biUnion g).SupIndep f := by
rw [← sup_eq_biUnion]
exact hs.sup hg
/-- Bind operation for `SupIndep`. -/
protected theorem SupIndep.sigma {β : ι → Type*} {s : Finset ι} {g : ∀ i, Finset (β i)}
{f : Sigma β → α} (hs : s.SupIndep fun i => (g i).sup fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩)
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, (g i).SupIndep fun b => f ⟨i, b⟩) : (s.sigma g).SupIndep f := by
rintro t ht ⟨i, b⟩ hi hit
rw [Finset.disjoint_sup_right]
rintro ⟨j, c⟩ hj
have hbc := (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit).symm
replace hj := ht hj
rw [mem_sigma] at hi hj
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· exact (hg _ hj.1).pairwiseDisjoint hi.2 hj.2 (sigma_mk_injective.ne_iff.1 hbc)
· refine (hs.pairwiseDisjoint hi.1 hj.1 hij).mono ?_ ?_
· convert le_sup (α := α) hi.2; simp
· convert le_sup (α := α) hj.2; simp
protected theorem SupIndep.product {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset ι'} {f : ι × ι' → α}
(hs : s.SupIndep fun i => t.sup fun i' => f (i, i'))
(ht : t.SupIndep fun i' => s.sup fun i => f (i, i')) : (s ×ˢ t).SupIndep f := by
rintro u hu ⟨i, i'⟩ hi hiu
rw [Finset.disjoint_sup_right]
rintro ⟨j, j'⟩ hj
have hij := (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hiu).symm
replace hj := hu hj
rw [mem_product] at hi hj
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· refine (ht.pairwiseDisjoint hi.2 hj.2 <| (Prod.mk_right_injective _).ne_iff.1 hij).mono ?_ ?_
· convert le_sup (α := α) hi.1; simp
· convert le_sup (α := α) hj.1; simp
· refine (hs.pairwiseDisjoint hi.1 hj.1 hij).mono ?_ ?_
· convert le_sup (α := α) hi.2; simp
· convert le_sup (α := α) hj.2; simp
theorem supIndep_product_iff {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset ι'} {f : ι × ι' → α} :
(s.product t).SupIndep f ↔ (s.SupIndep fun i => t.sup fun i' => f (i, i'))
∧ t.SupIndep fun i' => s.sup fun i => f (i, i') := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.product h.2⟩
simp_rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
refine fun h => ⟨fun i hi j hj hij => ?_, fun i hi j hj hij => ?_⟩ <;>
simp_rw [Finset.disjoint_sup_left, Finset.disjoint_sup_right] <;>
intro i' hi' j' hj'
· exact h (mk_mem_product hi hi') (mk_mem_product hj hj') (ne_of_apply_ne Prod.fst hij)
· exact h (mk_mem_product hi' hi) (mk_mem_product hj' hj) (ne_of_apply_ne Prod.snd hij)
end DistribLattice
end Finset
/-! ### On complete lattices via `sSup` -/
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
open Set Function
/-- An independent set of elements in a complete lattice is one in which every element is disjoint
from the `Sup` of the rest. -/
def sSupIndep (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Disjoint a (sSup (s \ {a}))
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.SetIndependent := sSupIndep
variable {s : Set α} (hs : sSupIndep s)
@[simp]
theorem sSupIndep_empty : sSupIndep (∅ : Set α) := fun x hx =>
(Set.not_mem_empty x hx).elim
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.setIndependent_empty := sSupIndep_empty
include hs in
theorem sSupIndep.mono {t : Set α} (hst : t ⊆ s) : sSupIndep t := fun _ ha =>
(hs (hst ha)).mono_right (sSup_le_sSup (diff_subset_diff_left hst))
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.SetIndependent.mono := sSupIndep.mono
include hs in
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any pair within that set is disjoint. -/
theorem sSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint : s.PairwiseDisjoint id := fun _ hx y hy h =>
disjoint_sSup_right (hs hx) ((mem_diff y).mpr ⟨hy, h.symm⟩)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.SetIndependent.pairwiseDisjoint := sSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
theorem sSupIndep_singleton (a : α) : sSupIndep ({a} : Set α) := fun i hi ↦ by
simp_all
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.setIndependent_singleton := sSupIndep_singleton
theorem sSupIndep_pair {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) :
sSupIndep ({a, b} : Set α) ↔ Disjoint a b := by
constructor
· intro h
exact h.pairwiseDisjoint (mem_insert _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _)) hab
· rintro h c ((rfl : c = a) | (rfl : c = b))
· convert h using 1
simp [hab, sSup_singleton]
· convert h.symm using 1
simp [hab, sSup_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.setIndependent_pair := sSupIndep_pair
include hs in
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any element is disjoint from the `sSup` of some
subset of the rest. -/
theorem sSupIndep.disjoint_sSup {x : α} {y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ⊆ s) (hxy : x ∉ y) :
Disjoint x (sSup y) := by
have := (hs.mono <| insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hx, hy⟩) (mem_insert x _)
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _), diff_singleton_eq_self hxy] at this
exact this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.SetIndependent.disjoint_sSup := sSupIndep.disjoint_sSup
/-- An independent indexed family of elements in a complete lattice is one in which every element
is disjoint from the `iSup` of the rest.
Example: an indexed family of non-zero elements in a
vector space is linearly independent iff the indexed family of subspaces they generate is
independent in this sense.
Example: an indexed family of submodules of a module is independent in this sense if
and only the natural map from the direct sum of the submodules to the module is injective. -/
def iSupIndep {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] (t : ι → α) : Prop :=
∀ i : ι, Disjoint (t i) (⨆ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), t j)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.Independent := iSupIndep
theorem sSupIndep_iff {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] (s : Set α) :
sSupIndep s ↔ iSupIndep ((↑) : s → α) := by
simp_rw [iSupIndep, sSupIndep, SetCoe.forall, sSup_eq_iSup]
refine forall₂_congr fun a ha => ?_
simp [iSup_subtype, iSup_and]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.setIndependent_iff := sSupIndep_iff
variable {t : ι → α} (ht : iSupIndep t)
theorem iSupIndep_def : iSupIndep t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (t i) (⨆ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), t j) :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.independent_def := iSupIndep_def
theorem iSupIndep_def' : iSupIndep t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (t i) (sSup (t '' { j | j ≠ i })) := by
simp_rw [sSup_image]
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.independent_def' := iSupIndep_def'
theorem iSupIndep_def'' :
iSupIndep t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (t i) (sSup { a | ∃ j ≠ i, t j = a }) := by
rw [iSupIndep_def']
aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.independent_def'' := iSupIndep_def''
@[simp]
theorem iSupIndep_empty (t : Empty → α) : iSupIndep t :=
nofun
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.independent_empty := iSupIndep_empty
@[simp]
theorem iSupIndep_pempty (t : PEmpty → α) : iSupIndep t :=
nofun
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.independent_pempty := iSupIndep_pempty
include ht in
/-- If the elements of a set are independent, then any pair within that set is disjoint. -/
theorem iSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint : Pairwise (Disjoint on t) := fun x y h =>
disjoint_sSup_right (ht x) ⟨y, iSup_pos h.symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias CompleteLattice.Independent.pairwiseDisjoint := iSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
theorem iSupIndep.mono {s t : ι → α} (hs : iSupIndep s) (hst : t ≤ s) : iSupIndep t :=
fun i => (hs i).mono (hst i) <| iSup₂_mono fun j _ => hst j
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias CompleteLattice.Independent.mono := iSupIndep.mono
| /-- Composing an independent indexed family with an injective function on the index results in
another indepedendent indexed family. -/
theorem iSupIndep.comp {ι ι' : Sort*} {t : ι → α} {f : ι' → ι} (ht : iSupIndep t)
(hf : Injective f) : iSupIndep (t ∘ f) := fun i =>
| Mathlib/Order/SupIndep.lean | 366 | 369 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure := HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_not_accPt h)]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot h)]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) s x := by
simp only [fderivWithin, dif_pos h]
split_ifs with h₀
exacts [h₀, Classical.choose_spec h]
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x := by
rw [fderiv, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ]
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x :=
((h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).differentiableAt hs).hasFDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.eventually_differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f y :=
(eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hs).mono fun _ => h.differentiableAt
protected theorem HasFDerivAt.fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = f' := by
ext
rw [h.unique h.differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt]
theorem fderiv_eq {f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F} (h : ∀ x, HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x) : fderiv 𝕜 f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).fderiv
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = f' :=
(hxs.eq h h.differentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt).symm
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono st⟩
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).differentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert_self :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert x s), fun h ↦ h.hasFDerivWithinAt.insert.differentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert y s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact differentiableWithinAt_insert_self
apply differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds
exact nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h
alias ⟨DifferentiableWithinAt.of_insert, DifferentiableWithinAt.insert'⟩ :=
differentiableWithinAt_insert
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
theorem DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(differentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.differentiableAt (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h x
protected theorem DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
| (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin hxs
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 641 | 643 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Card
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.CountableCover
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Perfect
/-!
# Cardinality of open subsets of vector spaces
Any nonempty open subset of a topological vector space over a nontrivially normed field has the same
cardinality as the whole space. This is proved in `cardinal_eq_of_isOpen`.
We deduce that a countable set in a nontrivial vector space over a complete nontrivially normed
field has dense complement, in `Set.Countable.dense_compl`. This follows from the previous
argument and the fact that a complete nontrivially normed field has cardinality at least
continuum, proved in `continuum_le_cardinal_of_nontriviallyNormedField`.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Pointwise Set Function Cardinal
open scoped Cardinal Topology
/-- A complete nontrivially normed field has cardinality at least continuum. -/
theorem continuum_le_cardinal_of_nontriviallyNormedField
(𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜] : 𝔠 ≤ #𝕜 := by
suffices ∃ f : (ℕ → Bool) → 𝕜, range f ⊆ univ ∧ Continuous f ∧ Injective f by
rcases this with ⟨f, -, -, f_inj⟩
simpa using lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective f_inj
apply Perfect.exists_nat_bool_injection _ univ_nonempty
refine ⟨isClosed_univ, preperfect_iff_nhds.2 (fun x _ U hU ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_norm_lt_one 𝕜 with ⟨c, c_pos, hc⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun n ↦ x + c^n) atTop (𝓝 (x + 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one hc)
rw [add_zero] at A
have B : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, x + c^n ∈ U := tendsto_def.1 A U hU
rcases B.exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨x + c^n, by simpa using hn, ?_⟩
simp only [add_ne_left]
apply pow_ne_zero
simpa using c_pos
/-- A nontrivial module over a complete nontrivially normed field has cardinality at least
continuum. -/
theorem continuum_le_cardinal_of_module
(𝕜 : Type u) (E : Type v) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nontrivial E] : 𝔠 ≤ #E := by
have A : lift.{v} (𝔠 : Cardinal.{u}) ≤ lift.{v} (#𝕜) := by
simpa using continuum_le_cardinal_of_nontriviallyNormedField 𝕜
simpa using A.trans (Cardinal.mk_le_of_module 𝕜 E)
/-- In a topological vector space over a nontrivially normed field, any neighborhood of zero has
the same cardinality as the whole space.
See also `cardinal_eq_of_mem_nhds`. -/
lemma cardinal_eq_of_mem_nhds_zero
{E : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [Zero E] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E)) : #s = #E := by
/- As `s` is a neighborhood of `0`, the space is covered by the rescaled sets `c^n • s`,
where `c` is any element of `𝕜` with norm `> 1`. All these sets are in bijection and have
therefore the same cardinality. The conclusion follows. -/
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : ∃ x : 𝕜 , 1 < ‖x‖ := NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 1
have cn_ne : ∀ n, c^n ≠ 0 := by
intro n
apply pow_ne_zero
rintro rfl
simp only [norm_zero] at hc
exact lt_irrefl _ (hc.trans zero_lt_one)
have A : ∀ (x : E), ∀ᶠ n in (atTop : Filter ℕ), x ∈ c^n • s := by
intro x
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (c^n) ⁻¹ • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : 𝕜) • x)) := by
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (c^n)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [← inv_pow]
apply tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one
rw [norm_inv]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ hc
exact Tendsto.smul_const this x
rw [zero_smul] at this
filter_upwards [this hs] with n (hn : (c ^ n)⁻¹ • x ∈ s)
exact (mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (cn_ne n) _ _).2 hn
have B : ∀ n, #(c^n • s :) = #s := by
intro n
have : (c^n • s :) ≃ s :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨(c^n)⁻¹ • x.1, (mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (cn_ne n) _ _).1 x.2⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨(c^n) • x.1, smul_mem_smul_set x.2⟩
left_inv := fun x ↦ by simp [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ (cn_ne n)]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by simp [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (cn_ne n)] }
exact Cardinal.mk_congr this
apply (Cardinal.mk_of_countable_eventually_mem A B).symm
/-- In a topological vector space over a nontrivially normed field, any neighborhood of a point has
the same cardinality as the whole space. -/
theorem cardinal_eq_of_mem_nhds
{E : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
{s : Set E} {x : E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : #s = #E := by
let g := Homeomorph.addLeft x
let t := g ⁻¹' s
have : t ∈ 𝓝 0 := g.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds (by simpa [g] using hs)
have A : #t = #E := cardinal_eq_of_mem_nhds_zero 𝕜 this
have B : #t = #s := Cardinal.mk_subtype_of_equiv s g.toEquiv
rwa [B] at A
/-- In a topological vector space over a nontrivially normed field, any nonempty open set has
the same cardinality as the whole space. -/
theorem cardinal_eq_of_isOpen
{E : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
(hs : IsOpen s) (h's : s.Nonempty) : #s = #E := by
rcases h's with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact cardinal_eq_of_mem_nhds 𝕜 (hs.mem_nhds hx)
/-- In a nontrivial topological vector space over a complete nontrivially normed field, any nonempty
| open set has cardinality at least continuum. -/
theorem continuum_le_cardinal_of_isOpen
{E : Type*} (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module 𝕜 E] [Nontrivial E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
{s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (h's : s.Nonempty) : 𝔠 ≤ #s := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Cardinality.lean | 119 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Alex Keizer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Snoc
/-!
This file establishes a set of normalization lemmas for `map`/`mapAccumr` operations on vectors
-/
variable {α β γ ζ σ σ₁ σ₂ φ : Type*} {n : ℕ} {s : σ} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
namespace List
namespace Vector
/-!
## Fold nested `mapAccumr`s into one
-/
section Fold
section Unary
variable (xs : Vector α n) (f₁ : β → σ₁ → σ₁ × γ) (f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × β)
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_mapAccumr :
mapAccumr f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd s₁
= let m := (mapAccumr (fun x s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_map {s : σ₁} (f₂ : α → β) :
(mapAccumr f₁ (map f₂ xs) s) = (mapAccumr (fun x s => f₁ (f₂ x) s) xs s) := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_mapAccumr {s : σ₂} (f₁ : β → γ) :
(map f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s).snd) = (mapAccumr (fun x s =>
let r := (f₂ x s); (r.fst, f₁ r.snd)
) xs s).snd := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_map (f₁ : β → γ) (f₂ : α → β) :
map f₁ (map f₂ xs) = map (fun x => f₁ <| f₂ x) xs := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f₁ : β → γ) (f₂ : (a : α) → p a → β) (H : ∀ x ∈ xs.toList, p x):
map f₁ (pmap f₂ xs H) = pmap (fun x hx => f₁ <| f₂ x hx) xs H := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (f₁ : (b : β) → p b → γ) (f₂ : α → β)
(H : ∀ x ∈ (xs.map f₂).toList, p x):
pmap f₁ (map f₂ xs) H = pmap (fun x hx => f₁ (f₂ x) hx) xs (by simpa using H) := by
induction xs <;> simp_all
end Unary
section Binary
variable (xs : Vector α n) (ys : Vector β n)
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr_left (f₁ : γ → β → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd ys s₁)
= let m := (mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd y s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map₂_map_left (f₁ : γ → β → ζ) (f₂ : α → γ) :
map₂ f₁ (map f₂ xs) ys = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ (f₂ x) y) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr_right (f₁ : α → γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs (mapAccumr f₂ ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := (mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ y s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ x r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂))
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map₂_map_right (f₁ : α → γ → ζ) (f₂ : β → γ) :
map₂ f₁ xs (map f₂ ys) = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ x (f₂ y)) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_mapAccumr₂ (f₁ : γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × ζ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr f₁ (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y s =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s.snd
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd s.fst
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
) xs ys (s₁, s₂)
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem map_map₂ (f₁ : γ → ζ) (f₂ : α → β → γ) :
map f₁ (map₂ f₂ xs ys) = map₂ (fun x y => f₁ <| f₂ x y) xs ys := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr₂_left_left (f₁ : γ → α → σ₁ → σ₁ × φ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd xs s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y (s₁, s₂) =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s₂
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd x s₁
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
)
xs ys (s₁, s₂)
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr₂_left_right
(f₁ : γ → β → σ₁ → σ₁ × φ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd ys s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y (s₁, s₂) =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s₂
let r₁ := f₁ r₂.snd y s₁
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
)
xs ys (s₁, s₂)
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr₂_right_left (f₁ : α → γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × φ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y (s₁, s₂) =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s₂
let r₁ := f₁ x r₂.snd s₁
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
)
xs ys (s₁, s₂)
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr₂_mapAccumr₂_right_right (f₁ : β → γ → σ₁ → σ₁ × φ) (f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ ys (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).snd s₁)
= let m := mapAccumr₂ (fun x y (s₁, s₂) =>
let r₂ := f₂ x y s₂
let r₁ := f₁ y r₂.snd s₁
((r₁.fst, r₂.fst), r₁.snd)
)
xs ys (s₁, s₂)
(m.fst.fst, m.snd) := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂ <;> simp_all
end Binary
end Fold
/-!
## Bisimulations
We can prove two applications of `mapAccumr` equal by providing a bisimulation relation that relates
the initial states.
That is, by providing a relation `R : σ₁ → σ₁ → Prop` such that `R s₁ s₂` implies that `R` also
relates any pair of states reachable by applying `f₁` to `s₁` and `f₂` to `s₂`, with any possible
input values.
-/
section Bisim
variable {xs : Vector α n}
theorem mapAccumr_bisim {f₁ : α → σ₁ → σ₁ × β} {f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × β} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
(R : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop) (h₀ : R s₁ s₂)
(hR : ∀ {s q} a, R s q → R (f₁ a s).1 (f₂ a q).1 ∧ (f₁ a s).2 = (f₂ a q).2) :
R (mapAccumr f₁ xs s₁).fst (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).fst
∧ (mapAccumr f₁ xs s₁).snd = (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn generalizing s₁ s₂
next => exact ⟨h₀, rfl⟩
next xs x ih =>
rcases (hR x h₀) with ⟨hR, _⟩
simp only [mapAccumr_snoc, ih hR, true_and]
congr 1
theorem mapAccumr_bisim_tail {f₁ : α → σ₁ → σ₁ × β} {f₂ : α → σ₂ → σ₂ × β} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
(h : ∃ R : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop, R s₁ s₂ ∧
∀ {s q} a, R s q → R (f₁ a s).1 (f₂ a q).1 ∧ (f₁ a s).2 = (f₂ a q).2) :
(mapAccumr f₁ xs s₁).snd = (mapAccumr f₂ xs s₂).snd := by
rcases h with ⟨R, h₀, hR⟩
exact (mapAccumr_bisim R h₀ hR).2
theorem mapAccumr₂_bisim {ys : Vector β n} {f₁ : α → β → σ₁ → σ₁ × γ}
{f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
(R : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop) (h₀ : R s₁ s₂)
(hR : ∀ {s q} a b, R s q → R (f₁ a b s).1 (f₂ a b q).1 ∧ (f₁ a b s).2 = (f₂ a b q).2) :
R (mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs ys s₁).1 (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).1
∧ (mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs ys s₁).2 = (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).2 := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ generalizing s₁ s₂
next => exact ⟨h₀, rfl⟩
next xs ys x y ih =>
rcases (hR x y h₀) with ⟨hR, _⟩
simp only [mapAccumr₂_snoc, ih hR, true_and]
congr 1
theorem mapAccumr₂_bisim_tail {ys : Vector β n} {f₁ : α → β → σ₁ → σ₁ × γ}
{f₂ : α → β → σ₂ → σ₂ × γ} {s₁ : σ₁} {s₂ : σ₂}
(h : ∃ R : σ₁ → σ₂ → Prop, R s₁ s₂ ∧
∀ {s q} a b, R s q → R (f₁ a b s).1 (f₂ a b q).1 ∧ (f₁ a b s).2 = (f₂ a b q).2) :
(mapAccumr₂ f₁ xs ys s₁).2 = (mapAccumr₂ f₂ xs ys s₂).2 := by
rcases h with ⟨R, h₀, hR⟩
exact (mapAccumr₂_bisim R h₀ hR).2
end Bisim
/-!
## Redundant state optimization
The following section are collection of rewrites to simplify, or even get rid, redundant
accumulation state
-/
section RedundantState
variable {xs : Vector α n} {ys : Vector β n}
protected theorem map_eq_mapAccumr {f : α → β} :
map f xs = (mapAccumr (fun x (_ : Unit) ↦ ((), f x)) xs ()).snd := by
induction xs using Vector.revInductionOn <;> simp_all
/--
If there is a set of states that is closed under `f`, and such that `f` produces that same output
for all states in this set, then the state is not actually needed.
Hence, then we can rewrite `mapAccumr` into just `map`.
-/
theorem mapAccumr_eq_map {f : α → σ → σ × β} {s₀ : σ} (S : Set σ) (h₀ : s₀ ∈ S)
(closure : ∀ a s, s ∈ S → (f a s).1 ∈ S)
(out : ∀ a s s', s ∈ S → s' ∈ S → (f a s).2 = (f a s').2) :
(mapAccumr f xs s₀).snd = map (f · s₀ |>.snd) xs := by
rw [Vector.map_eq_mapAccumr]
apply mapAccumr_bisim_tail
use fun s _ => s ∈ S, h₀
exact @fun s _q a h => ⟨closure a s h, out a s s₀ h h₀⟩
protected theorem map₂_eq_mapAccumr₂ {f : α → β → γ} :
map₂ f xs ys = (mapAccumr₂ (fun x y (_ : Unit) ↦ ((), f x y)) xs ys ()).snd := by
induction xs, ys using Vector.revInductionOn₂ <;> simp_all
/--
If there is a set of states that is closed under `f`, and such that `f` produces that same output
for all states in this set, then the state is not actually needed.
Hence, then we can rewrite `mapAccumr₂` into just `map₂`.
-/
theorem mapAccumr₂_eq_map₂ {f : α → β → σ → σ × γ} {s₀ : σ} (S : Set σ) (h₀ : s₀ ∈ S)
(closure : ∀ a b s, s ∈ S → (f a b s).1 ∈ S)
(out : ∀ a b s s', s ∈ S → s' ∈ S → (f a b s).2 = (f a b s').2) :
(mapAccumr₂ f xs ys s₀).snd = map₂ (f · · s₀ |>.snd) xs ys := by
rw [Vector.map₂_eq_mapAccumr₂]
apply mapAccumr₂_bisim_tail
use fun s _ => s ∈ S, h₀
exact @fun s _q a b h => ⟨closure a b s h, out a b s s₀ h h₀⟩
/--
If an accumulation function `f`, given an initial state `s`, produces `s` as its output state
for all possible input bits, then the state is redundant and can be optimized out.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapAccumr_eq_map_of_constant_state (f : α → σ → σ × β) (s : σ) (h : ∀ a, (f a s).fst = s) :
mapAccumr f xs s = (s, (map (fun x => (f x s).snd) xs)) := by
| induction xs using revInductionOn <;> simp_all
/--
If an accumulation function `f`, given an initial state `s`, produces `s` as its output state
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/MapLemmas.lean | 276 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
/-!
# Preadditive monoidal categories
A monoidal category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if it is preadditive and tensor product of morphisms
is linear in both factors.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- A category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if tensoring is additive in both factors.
Note we don't `extend Preadditive C` here, as `Abelian C` already extends it,
and we'll need to have both typeclasses sometimes.
-/
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
namespace MonoidalPreadditive
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `𝟙 X ⊗ f` by `X ◁ f`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem tensor_zero {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) : f ⊗ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `f ⊗ 𝟙 X` by `f ▷ X`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem zero_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) : (0 : W ⟶ X) ⊗ f = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem tensor_add {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ⊗ (g + h) = f ⊗ g + f ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem add_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f g : W ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f + g) ⊗ h = f ⊗ h + g ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
end MonoidalPreadditive
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
/-- A faithful additive monoidal functor to a monoidal preadditive category
ensures that the domain is monoidal preadditive. -/
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : D ⥤ C) [F.Monoidal] [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
theorem sum_tensor {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ⊗ f = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ⊗ f := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, sum_whiskerRight, Preadditive.sum_comp]
-- In a closed monoidal category, this would hold because
-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint and hence preserves all colimits.
-- In any case it is true in any preadditive category.
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorLeft X) where
preserves {J} :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype J
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => ⟨isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← tensor_sum, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i])⟩ } }
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorRight X) where
preserves {J} :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype J
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => ⟨isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← sum_tensor, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i])⟩ } }
variable [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
/-- The isomorphism showing how tensor product on the left distributes over direct sums. -/
def leftDistributor {J : Type} [Finite J] (X : C) (f : J → C) : X ⊗ ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ fun j => X ⊗ f j :=
(tensorLeft X).mapBiproduct f
theorem leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom =
∑ j : J, (X ◁ biproduct.π f j) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
classical
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
theorem leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) := by
classical
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp, zero_comp,
Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp,
biproduct.ι_desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Finite J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
| (leftDistributor X f).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = X ◁ biproduct.π _ j := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype J
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Finite J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 161 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
| theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 90 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.UnitaryGroup
import Mathlib.Util.Superscript
/-!
# `L²` inner product space structure on finite products of inner product spaces
The `L²` norm on a finite product of inner product spaces is compatible with an inner product
$$
\langle x, y\rangle = \sum \langle x_i, y_i \rangle.
$$
This is recorded in this file as an inner product space instance on `PiLp 2`.
This file develops the notion of a finite dimensional Hilbert space over `𝕜 = ℂ, ℝ`, referred to as
`E`. We define an `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι E` as a linear isometric equivalence
between `E` and `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`. Then `stdOrthonormalBasis` shows that such an equivalence
always exists if `E` is finite dimensional. We provide language for converting between a basis
that is orthonormal and an orthonormal basis (e.g. `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`). We show that
orthonormal bases for each summand in a direct sum of spaces can be combined into an orthonormal
basis for the whole sum in `DirectSum.IsInternal.subordinateOrthonormalBasis`. In
the last section, various properties of matrices are explored.
## Main definitions
- `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n`: defined to be `PiLp 2 (n → 𝕜)` for any `Fintype n`, i.e., the space
from functions to `n` to `𝕜` with the `L²` norm. We register several instances on it (notably
that it is a finite-dimensional inner product space), and provide a `!ₚ[]` notation (for numeric
subscripts like `₂`) for the case when the indexing type is `Fin n`.
- `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι`: defined to be an isometry to Euclidean space from a given
finite-dimensional inner product space, `E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`.
- `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`: constructs an `OrthonormalBasis` for a finite-dimensional
Euclidean space from a `Basis` which is `Orthonormal`.
- `Orthonormal.exists_orthonormalBasis_extension`: provides an existential result of an
`OrthonormalBasis` extending a given orthonormal set
- `exists_orthonormalBasis`: provides an orthonormal basis on a finite dimensional vector space
- `stdOrthonormalBasis`: provides an arbitrarily-chosen `OrthonormalBasis` of a given finite
dimensional inner product space
For consequences in infinite dimension (Hilbert bases, etc.), see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.L2Space`.
-/
open Real Set Filter RCLike Submodule Function Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal
ComplexConjugate DirectSum
noncomputable section
variable {ι ι' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F']
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-
If `ι` is a finite type and each space `f i`, `i : ι`, is an inner product space,
then `Π i, f i` is an inner product space as well. Since `Π i, f i` is endowed with the sup norm,
we use instead `PiLp 2 f` for the product space, which is endowed with the `L^2` norm.
-/
instance PiLp.innerProductSpace {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → Type*)
[∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (PiLp 2 f) where
inner x y := ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i)
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by
simp only [PiLp.norm_sq_eq_of_L2, map_sum, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, one_div]
conj_inner_symm := by
intro x y
unfold inner
rw [map_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
rintro z -
apply inner_conj_symm
add_left x y z :=
show (∑ i, inner (x i + y i) (z i)) = (∑ i, inner (x i) (z i)) + ∑ i, inner (y i) (z i) by
simp only [inner_add_left, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
smul_left x y r :=
show (∑ i : ι, inner (r • x i) (y i)) = conj r * ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i) by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, inner_smul_left]
@[simp]
theorem PiLp.inner_apply {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)]
[∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] (x y : PiLp 2 f) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ∑ i, ⟪x i, y i⟫ :=
rfl
/-- The standard real/complex Euclidean space, functions on a finite type. For an `n`-dimensional
space use `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 (Fin n)`.
For the case when `n = Fin _`, there is `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation for building elements of this type,
analogous to `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (n : Type*) : Type _ :=
PiLp 2 fun _ : n => 𝕜
section Notation
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Mathlib.Tactic (subscriptTerm)
/-- Notation for vectors in Lp space. `!₂[x, y, ...]` is a shorthand for
`(WithLp.equiv 2 _ _).symm ![x, y, ...]`, of type `EuclideanSpace _ (Fin _)`.
This also works for other subscripts. -/
syntax (name := PiLp.vecNotation) "!" noWs subscriptTerm noWs "[" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules | `(!$p:subscript[$e:term,*]) => do
-- override the `Fin n.succ` to a literal
let n := e.getElems.size
`((WithLp.equiv $p <| ∀ _ : Fin $(quote n), _).symm ![$e,*])
/-- Unexpander for the `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def EuclideanSpace.delabVecNotation : Delab :=
whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 6 do
-- check that the `(WithLp.equiv _ _).symm` is present
let p : Term ← withAppFn <| withAppArg do
let_expr Equiv.symm _ _ e := ← getExpr | failure
let_expr WithLp.equiv _ _ := e | failure
withNaryArg 2 <| withNaryArg 0 <| delab
-- to be conservative, only allow subscripts which are numerals
guard <| p matches `($_:num)
let `(![$elems,*]) := ← withAppArg delab | failure
`(!$p[$elems,*])
end Notation
theorem EuclideanSpace.nnnorm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : ‖x‖₊ = NNReal.sqrt (∑ i, ‖x i‖₊ ^ 2) :=
PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2 x
theorem EuclideanSpace.norm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : ‖x‖ = √(∑ i, ‖x i‖ ^ 2) := by
simpa only [Real.coe_sqrt, NNReal.coe_sum] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) x.nnnorm_eq
theorem EuclideanSpace.dist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : dist x y = √(∑ i, dist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) :=
PiLp.dist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.nndist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : nndist x y = NNReal.sqrt (∑ i, nndist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) :=
PiLp.nndist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.edist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : edist x y = (∑ i, edist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
PiLp.edist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.ball_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.ball (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 < r ^ 2} := by
ext x
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ∑ i, x i ^ 2 := Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sq_nonneg _
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, sqrt_lt this hr]
theorem EuclideanSpace.closedBall_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 ≤ r ^ 2} := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, sqrt_le_left hr]
theorem EuclideanSpace.sphere_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.sphere (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = r ^ 2} := by
ext x
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ∑ i, x i ^ 2 := Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sq_nonneg _
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs,
Real.sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq this hr]
section
variable [Fintype ι]
@[simp]
theorem finrank_euclideanSpace :
Module.finrank 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) = Fintype.card ι := by
simp [EuclideanSpace, PiLp, WithLp]
theorem finrank_euclideanSpace_fin {n : ℕ} :
Module.finrank 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 (Fin n)) = n := by simp
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_eq_star_dotProduct (x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) :
⟪x, y⟫ = dotProduct (WithLp.equiv _ _ y) (star <| WithLp.equiv _ _ x) :=
rfl
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_piLp_equiv_symm (x y : ι → 𝕜) :
⟪(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm x, (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm y⟫ = dotProduct y (star x) :=
rfl
/-- A finite, mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of `E`, which span `E`, induce an isometry
from `E` to `PiLp 2` of the subspaces equipped with the `L2` inner product. -/
def DirectSum.IsInternal.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily [DecidableEq ι] {V : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E}
(hV : DirectSum.IsInternal V)
(hV' : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun i => V i) fun i => (V i).subtypeₗᵢ) :
| E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] PiLp 2 fun i => V i := by
let e₁ := DirectSum.linearEquivFunOnFintype 𝕜 ι fun i => V i
let e₂ := LinearEquiv.ofBijective (DirectSum.coeLinearMap V) hV
refine LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner (e₂.symm.trans e₁) ?_
suffices ∀ (v w : PiLp 2 fun i => V i), ⟪v, w⟫ = ⟪e₂ (e₁.symm v), e₂ (e₁.symm w)⟫ by
intro v₀ w₀
convert this (e₁ (e₂.symm v₀)) (e₁ (e₂.symm w₀)) <;>
simp only [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
intro v w
trans ⟪∑ i, (V i).subtypeₗᵢ (v i), ∑ i, (V i).subtypeₗᵢ (w i)⟫
· simp only [sum_inner, hV'.inner_right_fintype, PiLp.inner_apply]
· congr <;> simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/PiL2.lean | 200 | 211 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.LinearMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.InvariantForm
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Cartan
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Linear
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.PID
/-!
# The trace and Killing forms of a Lie algebra.
Let `L` be a Lie algebra with coefficients in a commutative ring `R`. Suppose `M` is a finite, free
`R`-module and we have a representation `φ : L → End M`. This data induces a natural bilinear form
`B` on `L`, called the trace form associated to `M`; it is defined as `B(x, y) = Tr (φ x) (φ y)`.
In the special case that `M` is `L` itself and `φ` is the adjoint representation, the trace form
is known as the Killing form.
We define the trace / Killing form in this file and prove some basic properties.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.traceForm`: a finite, free representation of a Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear form
on `L` called the trace Form.
* `LieModule.traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent`: the trace form induced by a nilpotent
representation of a Lie algebra vanishes.
* `killingForm`: the adjoint representation of a (finite, free) Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear
form on `L` via the trace form construction.
-/
variable (R K L M : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
local notation "φ" => LieModule.toEnd R L M
open LinearMap (trace)
open Set Module
namespace LieModule
/-- A finite, free representation of a Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear form on `L` called
the trace Form. See also `killingForm`. -/
noncomputable def traceForm : LinearMap.BilinForm R L :=
((LinearMap.mul _ _).compl₁₂ (φ).toLinearMap (φ).toLinearMap).compr₂ (trace R M)
lemma traceForm_apply_apply (x y : L) :
traceForm R L M x y = trace R _ (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) :=
rfl
lemma traceForm_comm (x y : L) : traceForm R L M x y = traceForm R L M y x :=
LinearMap.trace_mul_comm R (φ x) (φ y)
lemma traceForm_isSymm : LinearMap.IsSymm (traceForm R L M) := LieModule.traceForm_comm R L M
@[simp] lemma traceForm_flip : LinearMap.flip (traceForm R L M) = traceForm R L M :=
Eq.symm <| LinearMap.ext₂ <| traceForm_comm R L M
/-- The trace form of a Lie module is compatible with the action of the Lie algebra.
See also `LieModule.traceForm_apply_lie_apply'`. -/
lemma traceForm_apply_lie_apply (x y z : L) :
traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z = traceForm R L M x ⁅y, z⁆ := by
calc traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z
= trace R _ (φ ⁅x, y⁆ ∘ₗ φ z) := by simp only [traceForm_apply_apply]
_ = trace R _ ((φ x * φ y - φ y * φ x) * φ z) := ?_
_ = trace R _ (φ x * (φ y * φ z)) - trace R _ (φ y * (φ x * φ z)) := ?_
_ = trace R _ (φ x * (φ y * φ z)) - trace R _ (φ x * (φ z * φ y)) := ?_
_ = traceForm R L M x ⁅y, z⁆ := ?_
· simp only [LieHom.map_lie, Ring.lie_def, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
· simp only [sub_mul, mul_sub, map_sub, mul_assoc]
· simp only [LinearMap.trace_mul_cycle' R (φ x) (φ z) (φ y)]
· simp only [traceForm_apply_apply, LieHom.map_lie, Ring.lie_def, mul_sub, map_sub,
← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
/-- Given a representation `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, the action of any `x : L` is skew-adjoint wrt
the trace form. -/
lemma traceForm_apply_lie_apply' (x y z : L) :
traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z = - traceForm R L M y ⁅x, z⁆ :=
calc traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z
= - traceForm R L M ⁅y, x⁆ z := by rw [← lie_skew x y, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply]
_ = - traceForm R L M y ⁅x, z⁆ := by rw [traceForm_apply_lie_apply]
lemma traceForm_lieInvariant : (traceForm R L M).lieInvariant L := by
intro x y z
rw [← lie_skew, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply, LieModule.traceForm_apply_lie_apply R L M]
/-- This lemma justifies the terminology "invariant" for trace forms. -/
@[simp] lemma lie_traceForm_eq_zero (x : L) : ⁅x, traceForm R L M⁆ = 0 := by
ext y z
rw [LieHom.lie_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, Module.Dual.lie_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply,
LinearMap.zero_apply, traceForm_apply_lie_apply', sub_self]
@[simp] lemma traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent [IsReduced R] [IsNilpotent L M] :
traceForm R L M = 0 := by
ext x y
simp only [traceForm_apply_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← isNilpotent_iff_eq_zero]
apply LinearMap.isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent
exact isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ R L M x y
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_genWeightSpace_eq [Module.Free R M]
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
[LieRing.IsNilpotent L] [IsNoetherian R M] [LinearWeights R L M] (χ : L → R) (x y : L) :
traceForm R L (genWeightSpace M χ) x y = finrank R (genWeightSpace M χ) • (χ x * χ y) := by
set d := finrank R (genWeightSpace M χ)
have h₁ : χ y • d • χ x - χ y • χ x • (d : R) = 0 := by simp [mul_comm (χ x)]
have h₂ : χ x • d • χ y = d • (χ x * χ y) := by
simpa [nsmul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul] using mul_left_comm (χ x) d (χ y)
have := traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent R L (shiftedGenWeightSpace R L M χ)
replace this := LinearMap.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun this x) y
rwa [LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, traceForm_apply_apply,
shiftedGenWeightSpace.toEnd_eq, shiftedGenWeightSpace.toEnd_eq,
← LinearEquiv.conj_comp, LinearMap.trace_conj', LinearMap.comp_sub, LinearMap.sub_comp,
LinearMap.sub_comp, map_sub, map_sub, map_sub, LinearMap.comp_smul, LinearMap.smul_comp,
LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.map_smul, LinearMap.map_smul,
trace_toEnd_genWeightSpace, trace_toEnd_genWeightSpace,
LinearMap.comp_smul, LinearMap.smul_comp, LinearMap.id_comp, map_smul, map_smul,
LinearMap.trace_id, ← traceForm_apply_apply, h₁, h₂, sub_zero, sub_eq_zero] at this
/-- The upper and lower central series of `L` are orthogonal wrt the trace form of any Lie module
`M`. -/
lemma traceForm_eq_zero_if_mem_lcs_of_mem_ucs {x y : L} (k : ℕ)
(hx : x ∈ (⊤ : LieIdeal R L).lcs L k) (hy : y ∈ (⊥ : LieIdeal R L).ucs k) :
traceForm R L M x y = 0 := by
induction k generalizing x y with
| zero =>
replace hy : y = 0 := by simpa using hy
simp [hy]
| succ k ih =>
rw [LieSubmodule.ucs_succ, LieSubmodule.mem_normalizer] at hy
simp_rw [LieIdeal.lcs_succ, ← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.mem_top, true_and] at hx
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ (fun z w _ _ hz hw ↦ ?_) (fun t z _ hz ↦ ?_) hx
· rintro - ⟨z, w, hw, rfl⟩
rw [← lie_skew, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply, neg_eq_zero, traceForm_apply_lie_apply]
exact ih hw (hy _)
· simp
· simp [hz, hw]
· simp [hz]
lemma traceForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs_of_mem_center {x y : L}
(hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1) (hy : y ∈ LieAlgebra.center R L) :
traceForm R L M x y = 0 := by
apply traceForm_eq_zero_if_mem_lcs_of_mem_ucs R L M 1
· simpa using hx
· simpa using hy
-- This is barely worth having: it usually follows from `LieModule.traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent`
@[simp] lemma traceForm_eq_zero_of_isTrivial [IsTrivial L M] :
traceForm R L M = 0 := by
ext x y
suffices φ x ∘ₗ φ y = 0 by simp [traceForm_apply_apply, this]
ext m
simp
/-- Given a bilinear form `B` on a representation `M` of a nilpotent Lie algebra `L`, if `B` is
invariant (in the sense that the action of `L` is skew-adjoint wrt `B`) then components of the
Fitting decomposition of `M` are orthogonal wrt `B`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_mem_genWeightSpace_mem_posFitting [LieRing.IsNilpotent L]
{B : LinearMap.BilinForm R M} (hB : ∀ (x : L) (m n : M), B ⁅x, m⁆ n = - B m ⁅x, n⁆)
{m₀ m₁ : M} (hm₀ : m₀ ∈ genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R)) (hm₁ : m₁ ∈ posFittingComp R L M) :
B m₀ m₁ = 0 := by
replace hB : ∀ x (k : ℕ) m n, B m ((φ x ^ k) n) = (- 1 : R) ^ k • B ((φ x ^ k) m) n := by
intro x k
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
intro m n
replace hB : ∀ m, B m (φ x n) = (- 1 : R) • B (φ x m) n := by simp [hB]
have : (-1 : R) ^ k • (-1 : R) = (-1 : R) ^ (k + 1) := by rw [pow_succ (-1 : R), smul_eq_mul]
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ, Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.comp_apply, ih, hB,
← (φ x).comp_apply, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp, ← pow_succ', ← smul_assoc, this]
suffices ∀ (x : L) m, m ∈ posFittingCompOf R M x → B m₀ m = 0 by
refine LieSubmodule.iSup_induction (motive := fun m ↦ (B m₀) m = 0) _ hm₁ this (map_zero _) ?_
aesop
clear hm₁ m₁; intro x m₁ hm₁
simp only [mem_genWeightSpace, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul, sub_zero] at hm₀
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hm₀ x
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := (mem_posFittingCompOf R x m₁).mp hm₁ k
simp [hB, hk]
lemma trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs
{k : ℕ} {x : L} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L k) :
trace R _ (toEnd R L M x) = 0 := by
replace hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 := antitone_lowerCentralSeries _ _ _ hk hx
replace hx : x ∈ Submodule.span R {m | ∃ u v : L, ⁅u, v⁆ = m} := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, ← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'] at hx
simpa using hx
refine Submodule.span_induction (p := fun x _ ↦ trace R _ (toEnd R L M x) = 0)
?_ ?_ (fun u v _ _ hu hv ↦ ?_) (fun t u _ hu ↦ ?_) hx
· intro y ⟨u, v, huv⟩
simp [← huv]
· simp
· simp [hu, hv]
· simp [hu]
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_lieSubalgebra_mk_left (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) {x : L} (hx : x ∈ L') (y : L') :
traceForm R L' M ⟨x, hx⟩ y = traceForm R L M x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_lieSubalgebra_mk_right (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) {x : L'} {y : L} (hy : y ∈ L') :
traceForm R L' M x ⟨y, hy⟩ = traceForm R L M x y :=
rfl
open TensorProduct
variable [LieRing.IsNilpotent L] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
lemma traceForm_eq_sum_genWeightSpaceOf
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [IsNoetherian R M] [IsTriangularizable R L M] (z : L) :
traceForm R L M =
∑ χ ∈ (finite_genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot R L M z).toFinset,
traceForm R L (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) := by
ext x y
have hxy : ∀ χ : R, MapsTo ((toEnd R L M x).comp (toEnd R L M y))
(genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) :=
fun χ m hm ↦ LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ <| LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ hm
have hfin : {χ : R | (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z : Submodule R M) ≠ ⊥}.Finite := by
convert finite_genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot R L M z
exact LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_eq_bot (genWeightSpaceOf M _ _)
classical
have h := LieSubmodule.iSupIndep_toSubmodule.mpr <| iSupIndep_genWeightSpaceOf R L M z
have hds := DirectSum.isInternal_submodule_of_iSupIndep_of_iSup_eq_top h <| by
simp [← LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule]
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, Finset.sum_apply, traceForm_apply_apply,
LinearMap.trace_eq_sum_trace_restrict' hds hfin hxy]
exact Finset.sum_congr (by simp) (fun χ _ ↦ rfl)
-- In characteristic zero (or even just `LinearWeights R L M`) a stronger result holds (no
-- `⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L`) TODO prove this using `LieModule.traceForm_eq_sum_finrank_nsmul_mul`.
lemma lowerCentralSeries_one_inf_center_le_ker_traceForm [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] :
lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 ⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L ≤ LinearMap.ker (traceForm R L M) := by
/- Sketch of proof (due to Zassenhaus):
Let `z ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 ⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L` and `x : L`. We must show that
`trace (φ x ∘ φ z) = 0` where `φ z : End R M` indicates the action of `z` on `M` (and likewise
for `φ x`).
Because `z` belongs to the indicated intersection, it has two key properties:
(a) the trace of the action of `z` vanishes on any Lie module of `L`
(see `LieModule.trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs`),
(b) `z` commutes with all elements of `L`.
If `φ x` were triangularizable, we could write `M` as a direct sum of generalized eigenspaces of
`φ x`. Because `L` is nilpotent these are all Lie submodules, thus Lie modules in their own right,
and thus by (a) above we learn that `trace (φ z) = 0` restricted to each generalized eigenspace.
Because `z` commutes with `x`, this forces `trace (φ x ∘ φ z) = 0` on each generalized eigenspace,
and so by summing the traces on each generalized eigenspace we learn the total trace is zero, as
required (see `LinearMap.trace_comp_eq_zero_of_commute_of_trace_restrict_eq_zero`).
To cater for the fact that `φ x` may not be triangularizable, we first extend the scalars from `R`
to `AlgebraicClosure (FractionRing R)` and argue using the action of `A ⊗ L` on `A ⊗ M`. -/
rintro z ⟨hz : z ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1, hzc : z ∈ LieAlgebra.center R L⟩
ext x
rw [traceForm_apply_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
let A := AlgebraicClosure (FractionRing R)
suffices algebraMap R A (trace R _ ((φ z).comp (φ x))) = 0 by
have _i : NoZeroSMulDivisors R A := NoZeroSMulDivisors.trans_faithfulSMul R (FractionRing R) A
rw [← map_zero (algebraMap R A)] at this
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R A this
rw [← LinearMap.trace_baseChange, LinearMap.baseChange_comp, ← toEnd_baseChange,
← toEnd_baseChange]
replace hz : 1 ⊗ₜ z ∈ lowerCentralSeries A (A ⊗[R] L) (A ⊗[R] L) 1 := by
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_zero] at hz ⊢
rw [← LieSubmodule.baseChange_top, ← LieSubmodule.lie_baseChange]
exact Submodule.tmul_mem_baseChange_of_mem 1 hz
replace hzc : 1 ⊗ₜ[R] z ∈ LieAlgebra.center A (A ⊗[R] L) := by
simp only [mem_maxTrivSubmodule] at hzc ⊢
intro y
exact y.induction_on rfl (fun a u ↦ by simp [hzc u])
(fun u v hu hv ↦ by simp [A, hu, hv])
apply LinearMap.trace_comp_eq_zero_of_commute_of_trace_restrict_eq_zero
· exact IsTriangularizable.maxGenEigenspace_eq_top (1 ⊗ₜ[R] x)
· exact fun μ ↦ trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs A (A ⊗[R] L)
(genWeightSpaceOf (A ⊗[R] M) μ ((1:A) ⊗ₜ[R] x)) (le_refl 1) hz
· exact commute_toEnd_of_mem_center_right (A ⊗[R] M) hzc (1 ⊗ₜ x)
/-- A nilpotent Lie algebra with a representation whose trace form is non-singular is Abelian. -/
lemma isLieAbelian_of_ker_traceForm_eq_bot [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(h : LinearMap.ker (traceForm R L M) = ⊥) : IsLieAbelian L := by
simpa only [← disjoint_lowerCentralSeries_maxTrivSubmodule_iff R L L, disjoint_iff_inf_le,
LieIdeal.toLieSubalgebra_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_eq_bot, h]
using lowerCentralSeries_one_inf_center_le_ker_traceForm R L M
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule (traceForm)
variable {R L M}
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
variable [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
(N : LieSubmodule R L M) (I : LieIdeal R L) (h : I ≤ N.idealizer) (x : L) {y : L} (hy : y ∈ I)
lemma trace_eq_trace_restrict_of_le_idealizer
(hy' : ∀ m ∈ N, (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) m ∈ N := fun m _ ↦ N.lie_mem (N.mem_idealizer.mp (h hy) m)) :
trace R M (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) = trace R N ((φ x ∘ₗ φ y).restrict hy') := by
suffices ∀ m, ⁅x, ⁅y, m⁆⁆ ∈ N by
have : (trace R { x // x ∈ N }) ((φ x ∘ₗ φ y).restrict _) = (trace R M) (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) :=
(φ x ∘ₗ φ y).trace_restrict_eq_of_forall_mem _ this
simp [this]
exact fun m ↦ N.lie_mem (h hy m)
include h in
lemma traceForm_eq_of_le_idealizer :
traceForm R I N = (traceForm R L M).restrict I := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
change _ = trace R M (φ x ∘ₗ φ y)
rw [N.trace_eq_trace_restrict_of_le_idealizer I h x hy]
rfl
include h hy in
/-- Note that this result is slightly stronger than it might look at first glance: we only assume
that `N` is trivial over `I` rather than all of `L`. This means that it applies in the important
case of an Abelian ideal (which has `M = L` and `N = I`). -/
lemma traceForm_eq_zero_of_isTrivial [LieModule.IsTrivial I N] :
trace R M (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) = 0 := by
let hy' : ∀ m ∈ N, (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) m ∈ N := fun m _ ↦ N.lie_mem (N.mem_idealizer.mp (h hy) m)
suffices (φ x ∘ₗ φ y).restrict hy' = 0 by
simp [this, N.trace_eq_trace_restrict_of_le_idealizer I h x hy]
ext (n : N)
suffices ⁅y, (n : M)⁆ = 0 by simp [this]
exact Submodule.coe_eq_zero.mpr (LieModule.IsTrivial.trivial (⟨y, hy⟩ : I) n)
end LieSubmodule
section LieAlgebra
/-- A finite, free (as an `R`-module) Lie algebra `L` carries a bilinear form on `L`.
This is a specialisation of `LieModule.traceForm` to the adjoint representation of `L`. -/
noncomputable abbrev killingForm : LinearMap.BilinForm R L := LieModule.traceForm R L L
open LieAlgebra in
lemma killingForm_apply_apply (x y : L) : killingForm R L x y = trace R L (ad R L x ∘ₗ ad R L y) :=
LieModule.traceForm_apply_apply R L L x y
lemma killingForm_eq_zero_of_mem_zeroRoot_mem_posFitting
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) [LieRing.IsNilpotent H]
{x₀ x₁ : L}
(hx₀ : x₀ ∈ LieAlgebra.zeroRootSubalgebra R L H)
(hx₁ : x₁ ∈ LieModule.posFittingComp R H L) :
killingForm R L x₀ x₁ = 0 :=
LieModule.eq_zero_of_mem_genWeightSpace_mem_posFitting R H L
(fun x y z ↦ LieModule.traceForm_apply_lie_apply' R L L x y z) hx₀ hx₁
namespace LieIdeal
variable (I : LieIdeal R L)
/-- The orthogonal complement of an ideal with respect to the killing form is an ideal. -/
noncomputable def killingCompl : LieIdeal R L :=
LieAlgebra.InvariantForm.orthogonal (killingForm R L) (LieModule.traceForm_lieInvariant R L L) I
@[simp] lemma toSubmodule_killingCompl :
LieSubmodule.toSubmodule I.killingCompl = (killingForm R L).orthogonal I.toSubmodule :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_killingCompl {x : L} :
x ∈ I.killingCompl ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, killingForm R L y x = 0 := by
rfl
lemma coe_killingCompl_top :
killingCompl R L ⊤ = LinearMap.ker (killingForm R L) := by
ext x
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff, LinearMap.BilinForm.IsOrtho, LieModule.traceForm_comm R L L x]
lemma restrict_killingForm :
(killingForm R L).restrict I = LieModule.traceForm R I L :=
rfl
variable [Module.Free R L] [Module.Finite R L] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
lemma killingForm_eq :
killingForm R I = (killingForm R L).restrict I :=
LieSubmodule.traceForm_eq_of_le_idealizer I I <| by simp
@[simp] lemma le_killingCompl_top_of_isLieAbelian [IsLieAbelian I] :
I ≤ LieIdeal.killingCompl R L ⊤ := by
intro x (hx : x ∈ I)
simp only [mem_killingCompl, LieSubmodule.mem_top, forall_true_left]
intro y
rw [LieModule.traceForm_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.traceForm_eq_zero_of_isTrivial I I (by simp) _ hx
| end LieIdeal
open LieModule Module
open Submodule (span subset_span)
namespace LieModule
variable [Field K] [LieAlgebra K L] [Module K M] [LieModule K L M] [FiniteDimensional K M]
variable [LieRing.IsNilpotent L] [LinearWeights K L M] [IsTriangularizable K L M]
lemma traceForm_eq_sum_finrank_nsmul_mul (x y : L) :
traceForm K L M x y = ∑ χ : Weight K L M, finrank K (genWeightSpace M χ) • (χ x * χ y) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/TraceForm.lean | 394 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroObjects
/-!
# The category of (commutative) (additive) groups has a zero object.
`AddCommGroup` also has zero morphisms. For definitional reasons, we infer this from preadditivity
rather than from the existence of a zero object.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe u
namespace Grp
@[to_additive]
theorem isZero_of_subsingleton (G : Grp) [Subsingleton G] : IsZero G := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨1⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨1⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
| · ext x
have : x = 1 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
rw [this, map_one, map_one]
· ext
subsingleton
@[to_additive AddGrp.hasZeroObject]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/Zero.lean | 28 | 34 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Flow
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
/-!
# ω-limits
For a function `ϕ : τ → α → β` where `β` is a topological space, we
define the ω-limit under `ϕ` of a set `s` in `α` with respect to
filter `f` on `τ`: an element `y : β` is in the ω-limit of `s` if the
forward images of `s` intersect arbitrarily small neighbourhoods of
`y` frequently "in the direction of `f`".
In practice `ϕ` is often a continuous monoid-act, but the definition
requires only that `ϕ` has a coercion to the appropriate function
type. In the case where `τ` is `ℕ` or `ℝ` and `f` is `atTop`, we
recover the usual definition of the ω-limit set as the set of all `y`
such that there exist sequences `(tₙ)`, `(xₙ)` such that `ϕ tₙ xₙ ⟶ y`
as `n ⟶ ∞`.
## Notations
The `omegaLimit` locale provides the localised notation `ω` for
`omegaLimit`, as well as `ω⁺` and `ω⁻` for `omegaLimit atTop` and
`omegaLimit atBot` respectively for when the acting monoid is
endowed with an order.
-/
open Set Function Filter Topology
/-!
### Definition and notation
-/
section omegaLimit
variable {τ : Type*} {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
/-- The ω-limit of a set `s` under `ϕ` with respect to a filter `f` is `⋂ u ∈ f, cl (ϕ u s)`. -/
def omegaLimit [TopologicalSpace β] (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : τ → α → β) (s : Set α) : Set β :=
⋂ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω" => omegaLimit
/-- The ω-limit w.r.t. `Filter.atTop`. -/
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω⁺" => omegaLimit Filter.atTop
/-- The ω-limit w.r.t. `Filter.atBot`. -/
scoped[omegaLimit] notation "ω⁻" => omegaLimit Filter.atBot
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable (f : Filter τ) (ϕ : τ → α → β) (s s₁ s₂ : Set α)
/-!
### Elementary properties
-/
open omegaLimit
theorem omegaLimit_def : ω f ϕ s = ⋂ u ∈ f, closure (image2 ϕ u s) := rfl
theorem omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto {m : τ → τ} {f₁ f₂ : Filter τ} (hf : Tendsto m f₁ f₂) :
ω f₁ (fun t x ↦ ϕ (m t) x) s ⊆ ω f₂ ϕ s := by
refine iInter₂_mono' fun u hu ↦ ⟨m ⁻¹' u, tendsto_def.mp hf _ hu, ?_⟩
rw [← image2_image_left]
exact closure_mono (image2_subset (image_preimage_subset _ _) Subset.rfl)
theorem omegaLimit_mono_left {f₁ f₂ : Filter τ} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : ω f₁ ϕ s ⊆ ω f₂ ϕ s :=
omegaLimit_subset_of_tendsto ϕ s (tendsto_id'.2 hf)
theorem omegaLimit_mono_right {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : ω f ϕ s₁ ⊆ ω f ϕ s₂ :=
iInter₂_mono fun _u _hu ↦ closure_mono (image2_subset Subset.rfl hs)
theorem isClosed_omegaLimit : IsClosed (ω f ϕ s) :=
isClosed_iInter fun _u ↦ isClosed_iInter fun _hu ↦ isClosed_closure
theorem mapsTo_omegaLimit' {α' β' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β'] {f : Filter τ} {ϕ : τ → α → β}
{ϕ' : τ → α' → β'} {ga : α → α'} {s' : Set α'} (hs : MapsTo ga s s') {gb : β → β'}
(hg : ∀ᶠ t in f, EqOn (gb ∘ ϕ t) (ϕ' t ∘ ga) s) (hgc : Continuous gb) :
MapsTo gb (ω f ϕ s) (ω f ϕ' s') := by
simp only [omegaLimit_def, mem_iInter, MapsTo]
intro y hy u hu
refine map_mem_closure hgc (hy _ (inter_mem hu hg)) (forall_mem_image2.2 fun t ht x hx ↦ ?_)
calc
ϕ' t (ga x) ∈ image2 ϕ' u s' := mem_image2_of_mem ht.1 (hs hx)
_ = gb (ϕ t x) := ht.2 hx |>.symm
theorem mapsTo_omegaLimit {α' β' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β'] {f : Filter τ} {ϕ : τ → α → β}
{ϕ' : τ → α' → β'} {ga : α → α'} {s' : Set α'} (hs : MapsTo ga s s') {gb : β → β'}
(hg : ∀ t x, gb (ϕ t x) = ϕ' t (ga x)) (hgc : Continuous gb) :
MapsTo gb (ω f ϕ s) (ω f ϕ' s') :=
mapsTo_omegaLimit' _ hs (Eventually.of_forall fun t x _hx ↦ hg t x) hgc
theorem omegaLimit_image_eq {α' : Type*} (ϕ : τ → α' → β) (f : Filter τ) (g : α → α') :
ω f ϕ (g '' s) = ω f (fun t x ↦ ϕ t (g x)) s := by simp only [omegaLimit, image2_image_right]
theorem omegaLimit_preimage_subset {α' : Type*} (ϕ : τ → α' → β) (s : Set α') (f : Filter τ)
(g : α → α') : ω f (fun t x ↦ ϕ t (g x)) (g ⁻¹' s) ⊆ ω f ϕ s :=
mapsTo_omegaLimit _ (mapsTo_preimage _ _) (fun _t _x ↦ rfl) continuous_id
/-!
### Equivalent definitions of the omega limit
| The next few lemmas are various versions of the property
characterising ω-limits:
| Mathlib/Dynamics/OmegaLimit.lean | 108 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Quaternions
In this file we define quaternions `ℍ[R]` over a commutative ring `R`, and define some
algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`.
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra R a b c`, `ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
[Bourbaki, *Algebra I*][bourbaki1989] with coefficients `a`, `b`, `c`
(Many other references such as Wikipedia assume $\operatorname{char} R ≠ 2$ therefore one can
complete the square and WLOG assume $b = 0$.)
* `Quaternion R`, `ℍ[R]` : the space of quaternions, a.k.a.
`QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)`;
* `Quaternion.normSq` : square of the norm of a quaternion;
We also define the following algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`:
* `Ring ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, `StarRing ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
for any commutative ring `R`;
* `Ring ℍ[R]`, `StarRing ℍ[R]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R]` : for any commutative ring `R`;
* `IsDomain ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered commutative ring `R`;
* `DivisionRing ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered field `R`.
## Notation
The following notation is available with `open Quaternion` or `open scoped Quaternion`.
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ c₂ c₃`
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ 0 c₂`
* `ℍ[R]` : quaternions over `R`.
## Implementation notes
We define quaternions over any ring `R`, not just `ℝ` to be able to deal with, e.g., integer
or rational quaternions without using real numbers. In particular, all definitions in this file
are computable.
## Tags
quaternion
-/
/-- Quaternion algebra over a type with fixed coefficients where $i^2 = a + bi$ and $j^2 = c$,
denoted as `ℍ[R,a,b]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `imI`, `imJ`, and `imK`. -/
@[ext]
structure QuaternionAlgebra (R : Type*) (a b c : R) where
/-- Real part of a quaternion. -/
re : R
/-- First imaginary part (i) of a quaternion. -/
imI : R
/-- Second imaginary part (j) of a quaternion. -/
imJ : R
/-- Third imaginary part (k) of a quaternion. -/
imK : R
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "," c "]" =>
QuaternionAlgebra R a b c
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "]" => QuaternionAlgebra R a 0 b
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps]
def equivProd {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ R × R × R × R where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2.1, a.2.2.1, a.2.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def equivTuple {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) where
toFun a := ![a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4]
invFun a := ⟨a 0, a 1, a 2, a 3⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext ⟨_, _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivTuple_apply {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk.eta {R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃} (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : mk a.1 a.2 a.3 a.4 = a := rfl
variable {S T R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R} (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).subsingleton
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).surjective.nontrivial
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion.
Note that unless `c₂ = 0`, this definition is not particularly well-behaved;
for instance, `QuaternionAlgebra.star_im` only says that the star of an imaginary quaternion
is imaginary under this condition. -/
def im (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨0, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK⟩
@[simp]
theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im :=
rfl
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`. -/
@[coe] def coe (x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨x, 0, 0, 0⟩
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨coe⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := fun _ _ h => congr_arg re h
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually.
-- Should adjust `simps` to name properly, i.e. as `zero_re` rather than `instZero_zero_re`.
instance : Zero ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 0 := rfl
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨0⟩
section One
variable [One R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : One ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨1, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 1 := rfl
end One
end Zero
section Add
variable [Add R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Add ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2, a.3 + b.3, a.4 + b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_add_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) + mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ + b₁) (a₂ + b₂) (a₃ + b₃) (a₄ + b₄) :=
rfl
end Add
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass R]
@[simp] theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (zero_add _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x + y := by ext <;> simp
end AddZeroClass
section Neg
variable [Neg R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Neg ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨fun a => ⟨-a.1, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : -(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨-a₁, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ :=
rfl
end Neg
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup R]
@[simp] theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = -x := by ext <;> simp
instance : Sub ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 - b.1, a.2 - b.2, a.3 - b.3, a.4 - b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sub_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) - mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ - b₁) (a₂ - b₂) (a₃ - b₃) (a₄ - b₄) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (add_zero _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_re : a - a.re = a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_self _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _)
end AddGroup
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Multiplication is given by
* `1 * x = x * 1 = x`;
* `i * i = c₁ + c₂ * i`;
* `j * j = c₃`;
* `i * j = k`, `j * i = c₂ * j - k`;
* `k * k = - c₁ * c₃`;
* `i * k = c₁ * j + c₂ * k`, `k * i = -c₁ * j`;
* `j * k = c₂ * c₃ - c₃ * i`, `k * j = c₃ * i`. -/
instance : Mul ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b =>
⟨a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 + c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4,
a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 + c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3,
a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 + c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2,
a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 + c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 +
c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) * mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk
(a₁ * b₁ + c₁ * a₂ * b₂ + c₃ * a₃ * b₃ + c₂ * c₃ * a₃ * b₄ - c₁ * c₃ * a₄ * b₄)
(a₁ * b₂ + a₂ * b₁ + c₂ * a₂ * b₂ - c₃ * a₃ * b₄ + c₃ * a₄ * b₃)
(a₁ * b₃ + c₁ * a₂ * b₄ + a₃ * b₁ + c₂ * a₃ * b₂ - c₁ * a₄ * b₂)
(a₁ * b₄ + a₂ * b₃ + c₂ * a₂ * b₄ - a₃ * b₂ + a₄ * b₁) :=
rfl
end Ring
section SMul
variable [SMul S R] [SMul T R] (s : S)
instance : SMul S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where smul s a := ⟨s • a.1, s • a.2, s • a.3, s • a.4⟩
instance [SMul S T] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_assoc s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_assoc _ _ _
instance [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_comm s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp] theorem smul_re : (s • a).re = s • a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_im {S} [CommRing R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (smul_zero s).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk (re im_i im_j im_k : R) :
s • (⟨re, im_i, im_j, im_k⟩ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨s • re, s • im_i, s • im_j, s • im_k⟩ :=
rfl
end SMul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Zero R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) :
(↑(s • r) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = s • (r : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext rfl (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
(equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃).injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R]
instance : AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
natCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := by simp
intCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
intCast_ofNat _ := congr_arg coe (Int.cast_natCast _)
intCast_negSucc n := by
change coe _ = -coe _
rw [Int.cast_negSucc, coe_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = z :=
rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imI (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imJ (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imK (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
-- For the remainder of the file we assume `CommRing R`.
variable [CommRing R]
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
zero_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_zero _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
one_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_one _ := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x * y := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
lemma coe_ofNat {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]:
((ofNat(n) : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := by
rfl
-- TODO: add weaker `MulAction`, `DistribMulAction`, and `Module` instances (and repeat them
-- for `ℍ[R]`)
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap :=
{ toFun s := coe (algebraMap S R s)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, coe_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, coe_zero]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [map_mul, coe_mul]
map_add' x y := by simp only [map_add, coe_add] }
smul_def' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.commutes]
theorem algebraMap_eq (r : R) : algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] r = ⟨r, 0, 0, 0⟩ :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] : _ → _).Injective :=
fun _ _ ↦ by simp [algebraMap_eq]
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨by
rintro t ⟨a, b, c, d⟩ h
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro ht
simpa [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, ht] using h⟩
section
variable (c₁ c₂ c₃)
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.re` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def reₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := re
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imI` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imIₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imI
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imJ` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imJₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imJ
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imK` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imKₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imK
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple` as a linear equivalence. -/
def linearEquivTuple : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₗ[R] Fin 4 → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm -- proofs are not `rfl` in the forward direction
{ (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm with
toFun := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm
invFun := equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃) = equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple_symm :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm = (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm := rfl
/-- `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` has a basis over `R` given by `1`, `i`, `j`, and `k`. -/
noncomputable def basisOneIJK : Basis (Fin 4) R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
.ofEquivFun <| linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisOneIJK_repr (q : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
((basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃).repr q) = ![q.re, q.imI, q.imJ, q.imK] :=
rfl
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [rank_eq_card_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃), Fintype.card_fin]
norm_num
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [Module.finrank, rank_eq_four, Cardinal.toNat_ofNat]
/-- There is a natural equivalence when swapping the first and third coefficients of a
quaternion algebra if `c₂` is 0. -/
@[simps]
def swapEquiv : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₃,0,c₁] where
toFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
map_mul' _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
map_add' _ _ := by ext <;> simp [add_comm]
commutes' _ := by simp [algebraMap_eq]
end
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x - y :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_sub x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) ^ n :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_pow x n
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
Algebra.commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
(Algebra.smul_def r a).symm
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a := by rw [← coe_commutes, coe_mul_eq_smul]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ↑(x * y) := by rw [coe_mul, coe_mul_eq_smul]
/-- Quaternion conjugate. -/
instance instStarQuaternionAlgebra : Star ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where star a :=
⟨a.1 + c₂ * a.2, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩
@[simp] theorem re_star : (star a).re = a.re + c₂ * a.imI := rfl
@[simp]
theorem imI_star : (star a).imI = -a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imJ_star : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imK_star : (star a).imK = -a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_star : (star a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : star (mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) =
⟨a₁ + c₂ * a₂, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ := rfl
instance instStarRing : StarRing ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
star_involutive x := by simp [Star.star]
star_add a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm] ; ring
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by ext <;> simp [two_mul]; ring
theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by simp [self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star]
theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) - a :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 a.star_add_self'
lemma comm (r : R) (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]) : r * x = x * r := by
ext <;> simp [mul_comm]
instance : IsStarNormal a :=
⟨by
rw [commute_iff_eq, a.star_eq_two_re_sub];
ext <;> simp <;> ring⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x := by ext <;> simp
@[simp] theorem star_im : star a.im = -a.im + c₂ * a.imI := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [SMulCommClass S R R]
(s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
(by simp [mul_smul_comm]) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
/-- A version of `star_smul` for the special case when `c₂ = 0`, without `SMulCommClass S R R`. -/
theorem star_smul' [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (by simp) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re := by rw [h, coe_re]
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} :
a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨a.re, h.symm⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => eq_re_of_eq_coe h.symm⟩
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {c₁ c₂ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re := by
simp_all [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero]
theorem star_eq_neg {c₁ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
end CharZero
-- Can't use `rw ← star_eq_self` in the proof without additional assumptions
theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re := by
rw [← star_comm_self']
exact a.star_mul_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ starAddEquiv.trans opAddEquiv with
toFun := op ∘ star
invFun := star ∘ unop
map_mul' := fun x y => by simp
commutes' := fun r => by simp }
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] _) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
end QuaternionAlgebra
/-- Space of quaternions over a type, denoted as `ℍ[R]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `im_i`, `im_j`, and `im_k`. -/
def Quaternion (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] :=
QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "]" => Quaternion R
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps!]
def Quaternion.equivProd (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ R × R × R × R :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd _ _ _
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def Quaternion.equivTuple (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem Quaternion.equivTuple_apply (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] (x : ℍ[R]) :
Quaternion.equivTuple R x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Subsingleton <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
namespace Quaternion
variable {S T R : Type*} [CommRing R] (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R])
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R]`. -/
@[coe] def coe : R → ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.coe
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R] := ⟨coe⟩
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instRing
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S R] : SMul S ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| SMul S ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S T] [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
protected instance algebra [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra S ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Star ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarQuaternionAlgebra
instance : StarRing ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarRing
instance : IsStarNormal a := inferInstanceAs <| IsStarNormal (R := ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]) a
@[ext]
theorem ext : a.re = b.re → a.imI = b.imI → a.imJ = b.imJ → a.imK = b.imK → a = b :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion. -/
nonrec def im (x : ℍ[R]) : ℍ[R] := x.im
@[simp] theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a := a.re_add_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re := a.sub_self_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_re : a - ↑a.re = a.im := a.sub_self_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im := a.add_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x + y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_add x y
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im := a.neg_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R]) = -x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_neg x
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im := a.sub_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x - y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_sub x y
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.re * b.re - a.imI * b.imI - a.imJ * b.imJ - a.imK * b.imK :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_re a b).trans <| by simp [one_mul, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.re * b.imI + a.imI * b.re + a.imJ * b.imK - a.imK * b.imJ :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imI a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.re * b.imJ - a.imI * b.imK + a.imJ * b.re + a.imK * b.imI :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imJ a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.re * b.imK + a.imI * b.imJ - a.imJ * b.imI + a.imK * b.re :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imK a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x * y := QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ n :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_pow x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).re = z := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R]) := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem smul_re [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).re = s • a.re :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
nonrec theorem smul_im [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
a.smul_im s
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : (↑(s • r) : ℍ[R]) = s • (r : ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_smul _ _
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commute r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul_eq_smul r a
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.mul_coe_eq_smul r a
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_def : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R] : _ → _).Injective :=
QuaternionAlgebra.algebraMap_injective
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R]) = ↑(x * y) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.smul_coe x y
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Finite R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Free R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.rank_eq_four _ _ _
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.finrank_eq_four _ _ _
@[simp] theorem star_re : (star a).re = a.re := by
rw [QuaternionAlgebra.re_star, zero_mul, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem star_imI : (star a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imJ : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imK : (star a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_im : (star a).im = -a.im := a.im_star
nonrec theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.self_add_star', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.self_add_star, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.star_add_self', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.star_add_self, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re) - a := by
simp [a.star_eq_two_re_sub, Quaternion.coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R]) = x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_coe x
@[simp]
theorem im_star : star a.im = -a.im := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a := QuaternionAlgebra.star_smul' s a
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_of_eq_coe h
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R]} : a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_neg {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_neg
end CharZero
nonrec theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re :=
a.star_mul_eq_coe
nonrec theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re :=
a.mul_star_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
QuaternionAlgebra.starAe
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
/-- Square of the norm. -/
def normSq : ℍ[R] →*₀ R where
toFun a := (a * star a).re
map_zero' := by simp only [star_zero, zero_mul, zero_re]
map_one' := by simp only [star_one, one_mul, one_re]
map_mul' x y := coe_injective <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_star_eq_coe, star_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc y, y.mul_star_eq_coe,
coe_commutes, ← mul_assoc, x.mul_star_eq_coe, ← coe_mul]
theorem normSq_def : normSq a = (a * star a).re := rfl
theorem normSq_def' : normSq a = a.1 ^ 2 + a.2 ^ 2 + a.3 ^ 2 + a.4 ^ 2 := by
simp only [normSq_def, sq, mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, mul_re, star_re, star_imI, star_imJ,
star_imK]
theorem normSq_coe : normSq (x : ℍ[R]) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [normSq_def, star_coe, ← coe_mul, coe_re, sq]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_star : normSq (star a) = normSq a := by simp [normSq_def']
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_natCast (n : ℕ) : normSq (n : ℍ[R]) = (n : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_natCast, normSq_coe]
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_intCast (z : ℤ) : normSq (z : ℍ[R]) = (z : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_intCast, normSq_coe]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_neg : normSq (-a) = normSq a := by simp only [normSq_def, star_neg, neg_mul_neg]
theorem self_mul_star : a * star a = normSq a := by rw [mul_star_eq_coe, normSq_def]
theorem star_mul_self : star a * a = normSq a := by rw [star_comm_self, self_mul_star]
theorem im_sq : a.im ^ 2 = -normSq a.im := by
simp_rw [sq, ← star_mul_self, im_star, neg_mul, neg_neg]
theorem coe_normSq_add : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + a * star b + b * star a + normSq b := by
simp only [star_add, ← self_mul_star, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem normSq_smul (r : R) (q : ℍ[R]) : normSq (r • q) = r ^ 2 * normSq q := by
simp only [normSq_def', smul_re, smul_imI, smul_imJ, smul_imK, mul_pow, mul_add, smul_eq_mul]
theorem normSq_add (a b : ℍ[R]) : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re :=
calc
normSq (a + b) = normSq a + (a * star b).re + ((b * star a).re + normSq b) := by
simp_rw [normSq_def, star_add, add_mul, mul_add, add_re]
_ = normSq a + normSq b + ((a * star b).re + (b * star a).re) := by abel
_ = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re := by
rw [← add_re, ← star_mul_star a b, self_add_star', coe_re]
end Quaternion
namespace Quaternion
variable {R : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a : ℍ[R]}
@[simp]
theorem normSq_eq_zero : normSq a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ normSq.map_zero⟩
rw [normSq_def', add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg]
at h
· exact ext a 0 (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.1) (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.2)
all_goals apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
theorem normSq_ne_zero : normSq a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := normSq_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem normSq_nonneg : 0 ≤ normSq a := by
rw [normSq_def']
apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_le_zero : normSq a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
normSq_nonneg.le_iff_eq.trans normSq_eq_zero
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℍ[R] where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, mt (congr_arg QuaternionAlgebra.re) zero_ne_one⟩
instance : NoZeroDivisors ℍ[R] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab :=
have : normSq a * normSq b = 0 := by rwa [← map_mul, normSq_eq_zero]
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).imp normSq_eq_zero.1 normSq_eq_zero.1
instance : IsDomain ℍ[R] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
theorem sq_eq_normSq : a ^ 2 = normSq a ↔ a = a.re := by
rw [← star_eq_self, ← star_mul_self, sq, mul_eq_mul_right_iff, eq_comm]
exact or_iff_left_of_imp fun ha ↦ ha.symm ▸ star_zero _
theorem sq_eq_neg_normSq : a ^ 2 = -normSq a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp_rw [← star_eq_neg]
obtain rfl | hq0 := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp
· rw [← star_mul_self, ← mul_neg, ← neg_sq, sq, mul_left_inj' (neg_ne_zero.mpr hq0), eq_comm]
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section Field
variable [Field R] (a b : ℍ[R])
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℍ[R] where nnratCast q := (q : R)
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℍ[R] where ratCast q := (q : R)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma re_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma im_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imI_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imJ_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imK_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imI (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imJ (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imK (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
variable [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (a b : ℍ[R])
@[simps -isSimp]
instance instInv : Inv ℍ[R] :=
⟨fun a => (normSq a)⁻¹ • star a⟩
instance instGroupWithZero : GroupWithZero ℍ[R] :=
{ Quaternion.instNontrivial with
inv := Inv.inv
inv_zero := by rw [instInv_inv, star_zero, smul_zero]
mul_inv_cancel := fun a ha => by
rw [instInv_inv, Algebra.mul_smul_comm (normSq a)⁻¹ a (star a), self_mul_star, smul_coe,
inv_mul_cancel₀ (normSq_ne_zero.2 ha), coe_one] }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_inv (x : R) : ((x⁻¹ : R) : ℍ[R]) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) _
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_div (x y : R) : ((x / y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x / y :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_zpow (x : R) (z : ℤ) : ((x ^ z : R) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x z
instance instDivisionRing : DivisionRing ℍ[R] where
__ := Quaternion.instRing
__ := Quaternion.instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_natCast, coe_natCast]
ratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_intCast, coe_natCast]
nnqsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact NNRat.smul_def ..
qsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact Rat.smul_def ..
theorem normSq_inv : normSq a⁻¹ = (normSq a)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq _
theorem normSq_div : normSq (a / b) = normSq a / normSq b :=
map_div₀ normSq a b
theorem normSq_zpow (z : ℤ) : normSq (a ^ z) = normSq a ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ normSq a z
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_ratCast (q : ℚ) : normSq (q : ℍ[R]) = (q : ℍ[R]) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_ratCast, normSq_coe, coe_pow]
end Field
end Quaternion
namespace Cardinal
open Quaternion
section QuaternionAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R)
private theorem pow_four [Infinite R] : #R ^ 4 = #R :=
power_nat_eq (aleph0_le_mk R) <| by decide
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a type. -/
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_congr (QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃)]
simp only [mk_prod, lift_id]
ring
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by
rw [mk_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_univ, mk_quaternionAlgebra]
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] :
#(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by rw [mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- Show the quaternion ⟨w, x, y, z⟩ as a string "{ re := w, imI := x, imJ := y, imK := z }".
For the typical case of quaternions over ℝ, each component will show as a Cauchy sequence due to
the way Real numbers are represented.
-/
instance [Repr R] {a b c : R} : Repr ℍ[R, a, b, c] where
reprPrec q _ :=
s!"\{ re := {repr q.re}, imI := {repr q.imI}, imJ := {repr q.imJ}, imK := {repr q.imK} }"
end QuaternionAlgebra
section Quaternion
variable (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R]
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a type. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternion : #(ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
theorem mk_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R]) = #R :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite _ _ _
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternion : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
| theorem mk_univ_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quaternion.lean | 1,314 | 1,314 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
| ⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 591 | 592 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Factorization
/-!
# Categorical images
We define the categorical image of `f` as a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism `m`,
so that `m` factors through the `m'` in any other such factorisation.
## Main definitions
* A `MonoFactorisation` is a factorisation `f = e ≫ m`, where `m` is a monomorphism
* `IsImage F` means that a given mono factorisation `F` has the universal property of the image.
* `HasImage f` means that there is some image factorization for the morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
* In this case, `image f` is some image object (selected with choice), `image.ι f : image f ⟶ Y`
is the monomorphism `m` of the factorisation and `factorThruImage f : X ⟶ image f` is the
morphism `e`.
* `HasImages C` means that every morphism in `C` has an image.
* Let `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : P ⟶ Q` be morphisms in `C`, which we will represent as objects of the
arrow category `Arrow C`. Then `sq : f ⟶ g` is a commutative square in `C`. If `f` and `g` have
images, then `HasImageMap sq` represents the fact that there is a morphism
`i : image f ⟶ image g` making the diagram
X ----→ image f ----→ Y
| | |
| | |
↓ ↓ ↓
P ----→ image g ----→ Q
commute, where the top row is the image factorisation of `f`, the bottom row is the image
factorisation of `g`, and the outer rectangle is the commutative square `sq`.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasImageMaps` means that every commutative square admits an
image map.
* If a category `HasImages`, then `HasStrongEpiImages` means that the morphism to the image is
always a strong epimorphism.
## Main statements
* When `C` has equalizers, the morphism `e` appearing in an image factorisation is an epimorphism.
* When `C` has strong epi images, then these images admit image maps.
## Future work
* TODO: coimages, and abelian categories.
* TODO: connect this with existing working in the group theory and ring theory libraries.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- A factorisation of a morphism `f = e ≫ m`, with `m` monic. -/
structure MonoFactorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) where
I : C -- Porting note: violates naming conventions but can't think a better replacement
m : I ⟶ Y
[m_mono : Mono m]
e : X ⟶ I
fac : e ≫ m = f := by aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc MonoFactorisation] MonoFactorisation.I MonoFactorisation.m
MonoFactorisation.m_mono MonoFactorisation.e MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoFactorisation.fac
attribute [instance] MonoFactorisation.m_mono
namespace MonoFactorisation
/-- The obvious factorisation of a monomorphism through itself. -/
def self [Mono f] : MonoFactorisation f where
I := X
m := f
e := 𝟙 X
-- I'm not sure we really need this, but the linter says that an inhabited instance
-- ought to exist...
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (MonoFactorisation f) := ⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
/-- The morphism `m` in a factorisation `f = e ≫ m` through a monomorphism is uniquely
determined. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hI : F.I = F'.I)
(hm : F.m = eqToHom hI ≫ F'.m) : F = F' := by
obtain ⟨_, Fm, _, Ffac⟩ := F; obtain ⟨_, Fm', _, Ffac'⟩ := F'
cases hI
simp? at hm says simp only [eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp] at hm
congr
apply (cancel_mono Fm).1
rw [Ffac, hm, Ffac']
/-- Any mono factorisation of `f` gives a mono factorisation of `f ≫ g` when `g` is a mono. -/
@[simps]
def compMono (F : MonoFactorisation f) {Y' : C} (g : Y ⟶ Y') [Mono g] :
MonoFactorisation (f ≫ g) where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ g
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := F.e
/-- A mono factorisation of `f ≫ g`, where `g` is an isomorphism,
gives a mono factorisation of `f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofCompIso {Y' : C} {g : Y ⟶ Y'} [IsIso g] (F : MonoFactorisation (f ≫ g)) :
MonoFactorisation f where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ inv g
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := F.e
/-- Any mono factorisation of `f` gives a mono factorisation of `g ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def isoComp (F : MonoFactorisation f) {X' : C} (g : X' ⟶ X) : MonoFactorisation (g ≫ f) where
I := F.I
m := F.m
e := g ≫ F.e
/-- A mono factorisation of `g ≫ f`, where `g` is an isomorphism,
gives a mono factorisation of `f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsoComp {X' : C} (g : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso g] (F : MonoFactorisation (g ≫ f)) :
MonoFactorisation f where
I := F.I
m := F.m
e := inv g ≫ F.e
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then a mono factorisation of `f`
gives a mono factorisation of `g` -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} (F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
MonoFactorisation g.hom where
I := F.I
m := F.m ≫ sq.right
e := inv sq.left ≫ F.e
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
fac := by simp only [fac_assoc, Arrow.w, IsIso.inv_comp_eq, Category.assoc]
end MonoFactorisation
variable {f}
/-- Data exhibiting that a given factorisation through a mono is initial. -/
structure IsImage (F : MonoFactorisation f) where
lift : ∀ F' : MonoFactorisation f, F.I ⟶ F'.I
lift_fac : ∀ F' : MonoFactorisation f, lift F' ≫ F'.m = F.m := by aesop_cat
attribute [inherit_doc IsImage] IsImage.lift IsImage.lift_fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsImage.lift_fac
namespace IsImage
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem fac_lift {F : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (F' : MonoFactorisation f) :
F.e ≫ hF.lift F' = F'.e :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 <| by simp
variable (f)
/-- The trivial factorisation of a monomorphism satisfies the universal property. -/
@[simps]
def self [Mono f] : IsImage (MonoFactorisation.self f) where lift F' := F'.e
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (IsImage (MonoFactorisation.self f)) :=
⟨self f⟩
variable {f}
-- TODO this is another good candidate for a future `UniqueUpToCanonicalIso`.
/-- Two factorisations through monomorphisms satisfying the universal property
must factor through isomorphic objects. -/
@[simps]
def isoExt {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (hF' : IsImage F') :
F.I ≅ F'.I where
hom := hF.lift F'
inv := hF'.lift F
hom_inv_id := (cancel_mono F.m).1 (by simp)
inv_hom_id := (cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp)
variable {F F' : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) (hF' : IsImage F')
theorem isoExt_hom_m : (isoExt hF hF').hom ≫ F'.m = F.m := by simp
theorem isoExt_inv_m : (isoExt hF hF').inv ≫ F.m = F'.m := by simp
theorem e_isoExt_hom : F.e ≫ (isoExt hF hF').hom = F'.e := by simp
theorem e_isoExt_inv : F'.e ≫ (isoExt hF hF').inv = F.e := by simp
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then a mono factorisation of `f` that is an image
gives a mono factorisation of `g` that is an image -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} {F : MonoFactorisation f.hom} (hF : IsImage F) (sq : f ⟶ g)
[IsIso sq] : IsImage (F.ofArrowIso sq) where
lift F' := hF.lift (F'.ofArrowIso (inv sq))
lift_fac F' := by
simpa only [MonoFactorisation.ofArrowIso_m, Arrow.inv_right, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_inv_eq] using hF.lift_fac (F'.ofArrowIso (inv sq))
end IsImage
variable (f)
/-- Data exhibiting that a morphism `f` has an image. -/
structure ImageFactorisation (f : X ⟶ Y) where
F : MonoFactorisation f -- Porting note: another violation of the naming convention
isImage : IsImage F
attribute [inherit_doc ImageFactorisation] ImageFactorisation.F ImageFactorisation.isImage
namespace ImageFactorisation
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (ImageFactorisation f) :=
⟨⟨_, IsImage.self f⟩⟩
/-- If `f` and `g` are isomorphic arrows, then an image factorisation of `f`
gives an image factorisation of `g` -/
@[simps]
def ofArrowIso {f g : Arrow C} (F : ImageFactorisation f.hom) (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
ImageFactorisation g.hom where
F := F.F.ofArrowIso sq
isImage := F.isImage.ofArrowIso sq
end ImageFactorisation
/-- `HasImage f` means that there exists an image factorisation of `f`. -/
class HasImage (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_image : Nonempty (ImageFactorisation f)
attribute [inherit_doc HasImage] HasImage.exists_image
theorem HasImage.mk {f : X ⟶ Y} (F : ImageFactorisation f) : HasImage f :=
⟨Nonempty.intro F⟩
theorem HasImage.of_arrow_iso {f g : Arrow C} [h : HasImage f.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) [IsIso sq] :
HasImage g.hom :=
⟨⟨h.exists_image.some.ofArrowIso sq⟩⟩
instance (priority := 100) mono_hasImage (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : HasImage f :=
HasImage.mk ⟨_, IsImage.self f⟩
section
variable [HasImage f]
/-- Some factorisation of `f` through a monomorphism (selected with choice). -/
def Image.monoFactorisation : MonoFactorisation f :=
(Classical.choice HasImage.exists_image).F
/-- The witness of the universal property for the chosen factorisation of `f` through
a monomorphism. -/
def Image.isImage : IsImage (Image.monoFactorisation f) :=
(Classical.choice HasImage.exists_image).isImage
/-- The categorical image of a morphism. -/
def image : C :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).I
/-- The inclusion of the image of a morphism into the target. -/
def image.ι : image f ⟶ Y :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).m
@[simp]
theorem image.as_ι : (Image.monoFactorisation f).m = image.ι f := rfl
instance : Mono (image.ι f) :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).m_mono
/-- The map from the source to the image of a morphism. -/
def factorThruImage : X ⟶ image f :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).e
/-- Rewrite in terms of the `factorThruImage` interface. -/
@[simp]
theorem as_factorThruImage : (Image.monoFactorisation f).e = factorThruImage f :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.fac : factorThruImage f ≫ image.ι f = f :=
(Image.monoFactorisation f).fac
variable {f}
/-- Any other factorisation of the morphism `f` through a monomorphism receives a map from the
image. -/
def image.lift (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : image f ⟶ F'.I :=
(Image.isImage f).lift F'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.lift_fac (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : image.lift F' ≫ F'.m = image.ι f :=
(Image.isImage f).lift_fac F'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.fac_lift (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : factorThruImage f ≫ image.lift F' = F'.e :=
(Image.isImage f).fac_lift F'
@[simp]
theorem image.isImage_lift (F : MonoFactorisation f) : (Image.isImage f).lift F = image.lift F :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsImage.lift_ι {F : MonoFactorisation f} (hF : IsImage F) :
hF.lift (Image.monoFactorisation f) ≫ image.ι f = F.m :=
hF.lift_fac _
-- TODO we could put a category structure on `MonoFactorisation f`,
-- with the morphisms being `g : I ⟶ I'` commuting with the `m`s
-- (they then automatically commute with the `e`s)
-- and show that an `imageOf f` gives an initial object there
-- (uniqueness of the lift comes for free).
instance image.lift_mono (F' : MonoFactorisation f) : Mono (image.lift F') := by
refine @mono_of_mono _ _ _ _ _ _ F'.m ?_
simpa using MonoFactorisation.m_mono _
theorem HasImage.uniq (F' : MonoFactorisation f) (l : image f ⟶ F'.I) (w : l ≫ F'.m = image.ι f) :
l = image.lift F' :=
(cancel_mono F'.m).1 (by simp [w])
/-- If `has_image g`, then `has_image (f ≫ g)` when `f` is an isomorphism. -/
instance {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasImage g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) where
exists_image :=
⟨{ F :=
{ I := image g
m := image.ι g
e := f ≫ factorThruImage g }
isImage :=
{ lift := fun F' => image.lift
{ I := F'.I
m := F'.m
e := inv f ≫ F'.e } } }⟩
end
section
variable (C)
/-- `HasImages` asserts that every morphism has an image. -/
class HasImages : Prop where
has_image : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), HasImage f
attribute [inherit_doc HasImages] HasImages.has_image
attribute [instance 100] HasImages.has_image
end
section
/-- The image of a monomorphism is isomorphic to the source. -/
def imageMonoIsoSource [Mono f] : image f ≅ X :=
IsImage.isoExt (Image.isImage f) (IsImage.self f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageMonoIsoSource_inv_ι [Mono f] : (imageMonoIsoSource f).inv ≫ image.ι f = f := by
simp [imageMonoIsoSource]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageMonoIsoSource_hom_self [Mono f] : (imageMonoIsoSource f).hom ≫ f = image.ι f := by
simp only [← imageMonoIsoSource_inv_ι f]
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.id_comp]
-- This is the proof that `factorThruImage f` is an epimorphism
-- from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_%28category_theory%29, which is in turn taken from:
-- Mitchell, Barry (1965), Theory of categories, MR 0202787, p.12, Proposition 10.1
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem image.ext [HasImage f] {W : C} {g h : image f ⟶ W} [HasLimit (parallelPair g h)]
(w : factorThruImage f ≫ g = factorThruImage f ≫ h) : g = h := by
let q := equalizer.ι g h
let e' := equalizer.lift _ w
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
{ I := equalizer g h
m := q ≫ image.ι f
m_mono := mono_comp _ _
e := e' }
let v := image.lift F'
have t₀ : v ≫ q ≫ image.ι f = image.ι f := image.lift_fac F'
have t : v ≫ q = 𝟙 (image f) :=
(cancel_mono_id (image.ι f)).1
(by
convert t₀ using 1
rw [Category.assoc])
-- The proof from wikipedia next proves `q ≫ v = 𝟙 _`,
-- and concludes that `equalizer g h ≅ image f`,
-- but this isn't necessary.
calc
g = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ g := by rw [Category.id_comp]
_ = v ≫ q ≫ g := by rw [← t, Category.assoc]
_ = v ≫ q ≫ h := by rw [equalizer.condition g h]
_ = 𝟙 (image f) ≫ h := by rw [← Category.assoc, t]
_ = h := by rw [Category.id_comp]
instance [HasImage f] [∀ {Z : C} (g h : image f ⟶ Z), HasLimit (parallelPair g h)] :
Epi (factorThruImage f) :=
⟨fun _ _ w => image.ext f w⟩
theorem epi_image_of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [E : Epi f] : Epi (image.ι f) := by
rw [← image.fac f] at E
exact epi_of_epi (factorThruImage f) (image.ι f)
theorem epi_of_epi_image {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [Epi (image.ι f)]
[Epi (factorThruImage f)] : Epi f := by
rw [← image.fac f]
apply epi_comp
end
section
variable {f}
variable {f' : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] [HasImage f']
/-- An equation between morphisms gives a comparison map between the images
(which momentarily we prove is an iso).
-/
def image.eqToHom (h : f = f') : image f ⟶ image f' :=
image.lift
{ I := image f'
m := image.ι f'
e := factorThruImage f'
fac := by rw [h]; simp only [image.fac]}
instance (h : f = f') : IsIso (image.eqToHom h) :=
⟨⟨image.eqToHom h.symm,
⟨(cancel_mono (image.ι f)).1 (by
-- Porting note: added let's for used to be a simp [image.eqToHom]
let F : MonoFactorisation f' :=
⟨image f, image.ι f, factorThruImage f, (by aesop_cat)⟩
dsimp [image.eqToHom]
rw [Category.id_comp,Category.assoc,image.lift_fac F]
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
⟨image f', image.ι f', factorThruImage f', (by aesop_cat)⟩
rw [image.lift_fac F'] ),
(cancel_mono (image.ι f')).1 (by
-- Porting note: added let's for used to be a simp [image.eqToHom]
let F' : MonoFactorisation f :=
⟨image f', image.ι f', factorThruImage f', (by aesop_cat)⟩
dsimp [image.eqToHom]
rw [Category.id_comp,Category.assoc,image.lift_fac F']
let F : MonoFactorisation f' :=
⟨image f, image.ι f, factorThruImage f, (by aesop_cat)⟩
rw [image.lift_fac F])⟩⟩⟩
/-- An equation between morphisms gives an isomorphism between the images. -/
def image.eqToIso (h : f = f') : image f ≅ image f' :=
asIso (image.eqToHom h)
/-- As long as the category has equalizers,
the image inclusion maps commute with `image.eqToIso`.
-/
theorem image.eq_fac [HasEqualizers C] (h : f = f') :
image.ι f = (image.eqToIso h).hom ≫ image.ι f' := by
apply image.ext
dsimp [asIso,image.eqToIso, image.eqToHom]
rw [image.lift_fac] -- Porting note: simp did not fire with this it seems
end
section
variable {Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- The comparison map `image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g`. -/
def image.preComp [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] : image (f ≫ g) ⟶ image g :=
image.lift
{ I := image g
m := image.ι g
e := f ≫ factorThruImage g }
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.preComp_ι [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] :
image.preComp f g ≫ image.ι g = image.ι (f ≫ g) := by
dsimp [image.preComp]
rw [image.lift_fac] -- Porting note: also here, see image.eq_fac
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.factorThruImage_preComp [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] :
factorThruImage (f ≫ g) ≫ image.preComp f g = f ≫ factorThruImage g := by simp [image.preComp]
/-- `image.preComp f g` is a monomorphism.
-/
instance image.preComp_mono [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] : Mono (image.preComp f g) := by
refine @mono_of_mono _ _ _ _ _ _ (image.ι g) ?_
simp only [image.preComp_ι]
infer_instance
/-- The two step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ⟶ image (g ≫ h) ⟶ image h`
agrees with the one step comparison map
`image (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ≅ image ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) ⟶ image h`.
-/
theorem image.preComp_comp {W : C} (h : Z ⟶ W) [HasImage (g ≫ h)] [HasImage (f ≫ g ≫ h)]
[HasImage h] [HasImage ((f ≫ g) ≫ h)] :
image.preComp f (g ≫ h) ≫ image.preComp g h =
image.eqToHom (Category.assoc f g h).symm ≫ image.preComp (f ≫ g) h := by
apply (cancel_mono (image.ι h)).1
dsimp [image.preComp, image.eqToHom]
repeat (rw [Category.assoc,image.lift_fac])
rw [image.lift_fac,image.lift_fac]
variable [HasEqualizers C]
/-- `image.preComp f g` is an epimorphism when `f` is an epimorphism
(we need `C` to have equalizers to prove this).
-/
instance image.preComp_epi_of_epi [HasImage g] [HasImage (f ≫ g)] [Epi f] :
Epi (image.preComp f g) := by
apply @epi_of_epi_fac _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ (image.factorThruImage_preComp _ _)
exact epi_comp _ _
instance hasImage_iso_comp [IsIso f] [HasImage g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) :=
HasImage.mk
{ F := (Image.monoFactorisation g).isoComp f
isImage := { lift := fun F' => image.lift (F'.ofIsoComp f)
lift_fac := fun F' => by
dsimp
have : (MonoFactorisation.ofIsoComp f F').m = F'.m := rfl
rw [← this,image.lift_fac (MonoFactorisation.ofIsoComp f F')] } }
/-- `image.preComp f g` is an isomorphism when `f` is an isomorphism
(we need `C` to have equalizers to prove this).
-/
instance image.isIso_precomp_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] [HasImage g] : IsIso (image.preComp f g) :=
⟨⟨image.lift
{ I := image (f ≫ g)
m := image.ι (f ≫ g)
e := inv f ≫ factorThruImage (f ≫ g) },
⟨by
ext
simp [image.preComp], by
ext
simp [image.preComp]⟩⟩⟩
-- Note that in general we don't have the other comparison map you might expect
-- `image f ⟶ image (f ≫ g)`.
instance hasImage_comp_iso [HasImage f] [IsIso g] : HasImage (f ≫ g) :=
HasImage.mk
{ F := (Image.monoFactorisation f).compMono g
isImage :=
{ lift := fun F' => image.lift F'.ofCompIso
lift_fac := fun F' => by
rw [← Category.comp_id (image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫ F'.m),
← IsIso.inv_hom_id g,← Category.assoc]
refine congrArg (· ≫ g) ?_
have : (image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫ F'.m) ≫ inv g =
image.lift (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F') ≫
((MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F').m) := by
simp only [MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso_I, Category.assoc,
MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso_m]
rw [this, image.lift_fac (MonoFactorisation.ofCompIso F'),image.as_ι] }}
/-- Postcomposing by an isomorphism induces an isomorphism on the image. -/
def image.compIso [HasImage f] [IsIso g] : image f ≅ image (f ≫ g) where
hom := image.lift (Image.monoFactorisation (f ≫ g)).ofCompIso
inv := image.lift ((Image.monoFactorisation f).compMono g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.compIso_hom_comp_image_ι [HasImage f] [IsIso g] :
(image.compIso f g).hom ≫ image.ι (f ≫ g) = image.ι f ≫ g := by
ext
simp [image.compIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem image.compIso_inv_comp_image_ι [HasImage f] [IsIso g] :
(image.compIso f g).inv ≫ image.ι f = image.ι (f ≫ g) ≫ inv g := by
ext
simp [image.compIso]
end
end CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
instance {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] : HasImage (Arrow.mk f).hom :=
show HasImage f by infer_instance
end
section HasImageMap
-- Don't generate unnecessary injectivity lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- An image map is a morphism `image f → image g` fitting into a commutative square and satisfying
the obvious commutativity conditions. -/
structure ImageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) where
map : image f.hom ⟶ image g.hom
map_ι : map ≫ image.ι g.hom = image.ι f.hom ≫ sq.right := by aesop
attribute [inherit_doc ImageMap] ImageMap.map ImageMap.map_ι
instance inhabitedImageMap {f : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] : Inhabited (ImageMap (𝟙 f)) :=
⟨⟨𝟙 _, by simp⟩⟩
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ImageMap.map_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ImageMap.factor_map {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(m : ImageMap sq) : factorThruImage f.hom ≫ m.map = sq.left ≫ factorThruImage g.hom :=
(cancel_mono (image.ι g.hom)).1 <| by simp
/-- To give an image map for a commutative square with `f` at the top and `g` at the bottom, it
suffices to give a map between any mono factorisation of `f` and any image factorisation of
`g`. -/
def ImageMap.transport {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) {F' : MonoFactorisation g.hom} (hF' : IsImage F')
{map : F.I ⟶ F'.I} (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : ImageMap sq where
map := image.lift F ≫ map ≫ hF'.lift (Image.monoFactorisation g.hom)
map_ι := by simp [map_ι]
/-- `HasImageMap sq` means that there is an `ImageMap` for the square `sq`. -/
class HasImageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g) : Prop where
mk' ::
has_image_map : Nonempty (ImageMap sq)
attribute [inherit_doc HasImageMap] HasImageMap.has_image_map
theorem HasImageMap.mk {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] {sq : f ⟶ g}
(m : ImageMap sq) : HasImageMap sq :=
⟨Nonempty.intro m⟩
theorem HasImageMap.transport {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
(F : MonoFactorisation f.hom) {F' : MonoFactorisation g.hom} (hF' : IsImage F')
(map : F.I ⟶ F'.I) (map_ι : map ≫ F'.m = F.m ≫ sq.right) : HasImageMap sq :=
HasImageMap.mk <| ImageMap.transport sq F hF' map_ι
|
/-- Obtain an `ImageMap` from a `HasImageMap` instance. -/
def HasImageMap.imageMap {f g : Arrow C} [HasImage f.hom] [HasImage g.hom] (sq : f ⟶ g)
[HasImageMap sq] : ImageMap sq :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Images.lean | 648 | 651 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
| in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 738 | 746 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
protected theorem ofNat [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) [d.AtLeastTwo] :
PosSemidef (ofNat(d) : Matrix n n R) :=
.natCast d
protected theorem intCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℤ) (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_intCast _, fun x => by
simp only [intCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul]
exact zsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) hd⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_intCast_iff
[StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial R] (d : ℤ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) ↔ 0 ≤ d :=
posSemidef_diagonal_iff.trans <| by simp [Pi.le_def]
protected lemma pow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (k : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (M ^ k) :=
match k with
| 0 => .one
| 1 => by simpa using hM
| (k + 2) => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
simpa only [hM.isHermitian.eq] using (hM.pow k).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same M
protected lemma inv [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M⁻¹.PosSemidef := by
by_cases h : IsUnit M.det
· have := (conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM M⁻¹).conjTranspose
rwa [mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right _ _ h, conjTranspose_conjTranspose] at this
· rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
exact .zero
protected lemma zpow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (z : ℤ) :
(M ^ z).PosSemidef := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· simpa using hM.pow n
· simpa using (hM.pow n).inv
protected lemma add [AddLeftMono R] {A : Matrix m m R} {B : Matrix m m R}
(hA : A.PosSemidef) (hB : B.PosSemidef) : (A + B).PosSemidef :=
⟨hA.isHermitian.add hB.isHermitian, fun x => by
rw [add_mulVec, dotProduct_add]
exact add_nonneg (hA.2 x) (hB.2 x)⟩
/-- The eigenvalues of a positive semi-definite matrix are non-negative -/
lemma eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : Matrix.PosSemidef A) (i : n) : 0 ≤ hA.1.eigenvalues i :=
(hA.re_dotProduct_nonneg _).trans_eq (hA.1.eigenvalues_eq _).symm
section sqrt
variable [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A)
/-- The positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix -/
noncomputable def sqrt : Matrix n n 𝕜 :=
hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary.1 * diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) *
(star hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary : Matrix n n 𝕜)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Custom elaborator to produce output like `(_ : PosSemidef A).sqrt` in the goal view. -/
@[app_delab Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt]
def delabSqrt : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
whenNotPPOption getPPAnalysisSkip <|
withOverApp 7 <|
withOptionAtCurrPos `pp.analysis.skip true do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt 7
let optionsPerPos ← withNaryArg 6 do
return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) `pp.proofs.withType true
withTheReader Context ({· with optionsPerPos}) delab
lemma posSemidef_sqrt : PosSemidef hA.sqrt := by
apply PosSemidef.mul_mul_conjTranspose_same
refine posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr fun i ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, RCLike.nonneg_iff]
constructor
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_re]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_im]
@[simp]
lemma sq_sqrt : hA.sqrt ^ 2 = A := by
let C : Matrix n n 𝕜 := hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary
let E := diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues : n → 𝕜)
suffices C * (E * (star C * C) * E) * star C = A by
rw [Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt, pow_two]
simpa only [← mul_assoc] using this
have : E * E = diagonal ((↑) ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) := by
rw [diagonal_mul_diagonal]
congr! with v
simp [← pow_two, ← RCLike.ofReal_pow, Real.sq_sqrt (hA.eigenvalues_nonneg v)]
simpa [C, this] using hA.1.spectral_theorem.symm
@[simp]
lemma sqrt_mul_self : hA.sqrt * hA.sqrt = A := by rw [← pow_two, sq_sqrt]
include hA in
lemma eq_of_sq_eq_sq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B ^ 2) : A = B := by
/- This is deceptively hard, much more difficult than the positive *definite* case. We follow a
clever proof due to Koeber and Schäfer. The idea is that if `A ≠ B`, then `A - B` has a nonzero
real eigenvalue, with eigenvector `v`. Then a manipulation using the identity
`A ^ 2 - B ^ 2 = A * (A - B) + (A - B) * B` leads to the conclusion that
`⟨v, A v⟩ + ⟨v, B v⟩ = 0`. Since `A, B` are positive semidefinite, both terms must be zero. Thus
`⟨v, (A - B) v⟩ = 0`, but this is a nonzero scalar multiple of `⟨v, v⟩`, contradiction. -/
by_contra h_ne
let ⟨v, t, ht, hv, hv'⟩ := (hA.1.sub hB.1).exists_eigenvector_of_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero.mpr h_ne)
have h_sum : 0 = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := calc
0 = star v ⬝ᵥ (A ^ 2 - B ^ 2) *ᵥ v := by rw [hAB, sub_self, zero_mulVec, dotProduct_zero]
_ = star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [mulVec_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, ← dotProduct_add, ← add_mulVec, mul_sub, sub_mul,
add_sub, sub_add_cancel, pow_two, pow_two]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v) + (star v) ᵥ* (A - B)ᴴ ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [hv', mulVec_smul, dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul,
dotProduct_mulVec _ (A - B), hA.1.sub hB.1]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := by
simp_rw [← star_mulVec, hv', mul_add, ← RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← smul_dotProduct]
congr 2 with i
simp only [Pi.star_apply, Pi.smul_apply, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, star_mul',
RCLike.star_def, RCLike.conj_ofReal]
replace h_sum : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [eq_comm, ← mul_zero (t : 𝕜)] at h_sum
exact mul_left_cancel₀ (RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) h_sum
have h_van : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v = 0 ∧ star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ (hA.2 v), le_antisymm ?_ (hB.2 v)⟩
· rw [add_comm, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h_sum
simpa only [h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hB.2 v
· simpa only [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg.mp h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hA.2 v
have aux : star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [sub_mulVec, dotProduct_sub, h_van.1, h_van.2, sub_zero]
rw [hv', dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← mul_zero ↑t] at aux
exact hv <| dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero.mp <| mul_left_cancel₀
(RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) aux
lemma sqrt_sq : (hA.pow 2 : PosSemidef (A ^ 2)).sqrt = A :=
(hA.pow 2).posSemidef_sqrt.eq_of_sq_eq_sq hA (hA.pow 2).sq_sqrt
include hA in
lemma eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B) : A = hB.sqrt := by
subst B
rw [hA.sqrt_sq]
end sqrt
end PosSemidef
@[simp]
theorem posSemidef_submatrix_equiv {M : Matrix n n R} (e : m ≃ n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.submatrix e.symm, fun h => h.submatrix _⟩
/-- The conjugate transpose of a matrix multiplied by the matrix is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (Aᴴ * A) := by
refine ⟨isHermitian_transpose_mul_self _, fun x => ?_⟩
rw [← mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun i _ => star_mul_self_nonneg _
/-- A matrix multiplied by its conjugate transpose is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (A * Aᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self Aᴴ
lemma eigenvalues_conjTranspose_mul_self_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq n] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_transpose_mul_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
lemma eigenvalues_self_mul_conjTranspose_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq m] (i : m) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_mul_conjTranspose_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
/-- A matrix is positive semidefinite if and only if it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`. -/
lemma posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} :
PosSemidef A ↔ ∃ (B : Matrix n n 𝕜), A = Bᴴ * B := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hA ↦ ⟨hA.sqrt, ?_⟩, fun ⟨B, hB⟩ ↦ (hB ▸ posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self B)⟩
simp_rw [← PosSemidef.sq_sqrt hA, pow_two]
rw [hA.posSemidef_sqrt.1]
lemma IsHermitian.posSemidef_of_eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : IsHermitian A) (h : ∀ i : n, 0 ≤ hA.eigenvalues i) : PosSemidef A := by
rw [hA.spectral_theorem]
refine (posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr ?_).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same _
simpa using h
/-- For `A` positive semidefinite, we have `x⋆ A x = 0` iff `A x = 0`. -/
theorem PosSemidef.dotProduct_mulVec_zero_iff
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A) (x : n → 𝕜) :
star x ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ x = 0 ↔ A *ᵥ x = 0 := by
constructor
· obtain ⟨B, rfl⟩ := posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self.mp hA
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec,
vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star, dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero]
intro h0
rw [h0, mulVec_zero]
| · intro h0
rw [h0, dotProduct_zero]
/-- For `A` positive semidefinite, we have `x⋆ A x = 0` iff `A x = 0` (linear maps version). -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 318 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-06")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/FundThmCalculus.lean | 662 | 666 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 708 | 710 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject
/-!
# Homological complexes are differential graded objects.
We verify that a `HomologicalComplex` indexed by an `AddCommGroup` is
essentially the same thing as a differential graded object.
This equivalence is probably not particularly useful in practice;
it's here to check that definitions match up as expected.
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
noncomputable section
/-!
We first prove some results about differential graded objects.
Porting note: after the port, move these to their own file.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory.DifferentialObject
variable {β : Type*} [AddCommGroup β] {b : β}
variable {V : Type*} [Category V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
variable (X : DifferentialObject ℤ (GradedObjectWithShift b V))
/-- Since `eqToHom` only preserves the fact that `X.X i = X.X j` but not `i = j`, this definition
is used to aid the simplifier. -/
abbrev objEqToHom {i j : β} (h : i = j) :
X.obj i ⟶ X.obj j :=
eqToHom (congr_arg X.obj h)
@[simp]
theorem objEqToHom_refl (i : β) : X.objEqToHom (refl i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem objEqToHom_d {x y : β} (h : x = y) :
X.objEqToHom h ≫ X.d y = X.d x ≫ X.objEqToHom (by cases h; rfl) := by cases h; dsimp; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_squared_apply {x : β} : X.d x ≫ X.d _ = 0 := congr_fun X.d_squared _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem eqToHom_f' {X Y : DifferentialObject ℤ (GradedObjectWithShift b V)} (f : X ⟶ Y) {x y : β}
| (h : x = y) : X.objEqToHom h ≫ f.f y = f.f x ≫ Y.objEqToHom h := by cases h; simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/DifferentialObject.lean | 53 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,007 | 1,008 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Map
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of group actions
This file primarily concerns itself with orbits, stabilizers, and other objects defined in terms of
actions. Despite this file being called `basic`, low-level helper lemmas for algebraic manipulation
of `•` belong elsewhere.
## Main definitions
* `MulAction.orbit`
* `MulAction.fixedPoints`
* `MulAction.fixedBy`
* `MulAction.stabilizer`
-/
universe u v
open Pointwise
open Function
namespace MulAction
variable (M : Type u) [Monoid M] (α : Type v) [MulAction M α] {β : Type*} [MulAction M β]
section Orbit
variable {α M}
@[to_additive]
lemma fst_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit {x y : α × β} (h : x ∈ MulAction.orbit M y) :
x.1 ∈ MulAction.orbit M y.1 := by
rcases h with ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact mem_orbit _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma snd_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit {x y : α × β} (h : x ∈ MulAction.orbit M y) :
x.2 ∈ MulAction.orbit M y.2 := by
rcases h with ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact mem_orbit _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Finite.finite_mulAction_orbit [Finite M] (a : α) : Set.Finite (orbit M a) :=
Set.finite_range _
variable (M)
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit_eq_univ [IsPretransitive M α] (a : α) : orbit M a = Set.univ :=
(surjective_smul M a).range_eq
end Orbit
section FixedPoints
variable {M α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_orbit_iff_mem_fixedPoints {a : α} :
(orbit M a).Subsingleton ↔ a ∈ fixedPoints M α := by
rw [mem_fixedPoints]
constructor
· exact fun h m ↦ h (mem_orbit a m) (mem_orbit_self a)
· rintro h _ ⟨m, rfl⟩ y ⟨p, rfl⟩
simp only [h]
@[to_additive mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one]
theorem mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one {a : α} [Fintype (orbit M a)] :
a ∈ fixedPoints M α ↔ Fintype.card (orbit M a) = 1 := by
simp only [← subsingleton_orbit_iff_mem_fixedPoints, le_antisymm_iff,
Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton, Nat.add_one_le_iff, Fintype.card_pos_iff,
Set.subsingleton_coe, iff_self_and, Set.nonempty_coe_sort, orbit_nonempty, implies_true]
@[to_additive instDecidablePredMemSetFixedByAddOfDecidableEq]
instance (m : M) [DecidableEq β] :
DecidablePred fun b : β => b ∈ MulAction.fixedBy β m := fun b ↦ by
simp only [MulAction.mem_fixedBy, Equiv.Perm.smul_def]
infer_instance
end FixedPoints
end MulAction
/-- `smul` by a `k : M` over a group is injective, if `k` is not a zero divisor.
The general theory of such `k` is elaborated by `IsSMulRegular`.
The typeclass that restricts all terms of `M` to have this property is `NoZeroSMulDivisors`. -/
theorem smul_cancel_of_non_zero_divisor {M G : Type*} [Monoid M] [AddGroup G]
[DistribMulAction M G] (k : M) (h : ∀ x : G, k • x = 0 → x = 0) {a b : G} (h' : k • a = k • b) :
a = b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine h _ ?_
rw [smul_sub, h', sub_self]
namespace MulAction
variable {G α β : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MulAction G β]
@[to_additive] theorem fixedPoints_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] :
fixedPoints G α = .univ := by
apply Set.eq_univ_of_forall
simp only [mem_fixedPoints]
intro x hx
apply Subsingleton.elim ..
/-- If a group acts nontrivially, then the type is nontrivial -/
@[to_additive "If a subgroup acts nontrivially, then the type is nontrivial."]
theorem nontrivial_of_fixedPoints_ne_univ (h : fixedPoints G α ≠ .univ) :
Nontrivial α :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial α).resolve_left fun _ ↦ h fixedPoints_of_subsingleton
section Orbit
-- TODO: This proof is redoing a special case of `MulAction.IsInvariantBlock.isBlock`. Can we move
-- this lemma earlier to golf?
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_orbit (g : G) (a : α) : g • orbit G a = orbit G a :=
(smul_orbit_subset g a).antisymm <|
calc
orbit G a = g • g⁻¹ • orbit G a := (smul_inv_smul _ _).symm
_ ⊆ g • orbit G a := Set.image_subset _ (smul_orbit_subset _ _)
/-- The action of a group on an orbit is transitive. -/
@[to_additive "The action of an additive group on an orbit is transitive."]
instance (a : α) : IsPretransitive G (orbit G a) :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨_, g, rfl⟩ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
use h * g⁻¹
ext1
simp [mul_smul]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_subgroup_le (H : Subgroup G) : orbitRel H α ≤ orbitRel G α :=
Setoid.le_def.2 mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit_subgroup
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) :
orbitRel (H.subgroupOf K) α = orbitRel (H ⊓ K : Subgroup G) α := by
rw [← Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype]
ext x
simp_rw [orbitRel_apply]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨⟨gv, gp⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul]
refine mem_orbit _ (⟨gv, ?_⟩ : Subgroup.map K.subtype (H.subgroupOf K))
simpa using gp
· rcases h with ⟨⟨gv, gp⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul]
simp only [Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype, Subgroup.mem_inf] at gp
refine mem_orbit _ (⟨⟨gv, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ : H.subgroupOf K)
· exact gp.2
· simp only [Subgroup.mem_subgroupOf]
exact gp.1
variable (G α)
/-- An action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient by `MulAction.orbitRel` is a
subsingleton. -/
@[to_additive "An additive action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient by
`AddAction.orbitRel` is a subsingleton."]
theorem pretransitive_iff_subsingleton_quotient :
IsPretransitive G α ↔ Subsingleton (orbitRel.Quotient G α) := by
refine ⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩, fun _ ↦ ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· refine Quot.inductionOn a (fun x ↦ ?_)
exact Quot.inductionOn b (fun y ↦ Quot.sound <| exists_smul_eq G y x)
· have h : Quotient.mk (orbitRel G α) b = ⟦a⟧ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Quotient.eq''.mp h
/-- If `α` is non-empty, an action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient has exactly one
element. -/
@[to_additive "If `α` is non-empty, an additive action is pretransitive if and only if the
quotient has exactly one element."]
theorem pretransitive_iff_unique_quotient_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] :
IsPretransitive G α ↔ Nonempty (Unique <| orbitRel.Quotient G α) := by
rw [unique_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty, pretransitive_iff_subsingleton_quotient, iff_self_and]
exact fun _ ↦ (nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr inferInstance
variable {G α}
@[to_additive]
instance (x : orbitRel.Quotient G α) : IsPretransitive G x.orbit where
exists_smul_eq := by
induction x using Quotient.inductionOn'
rintro ⟨y, yh⟩ ⟨z, zh⟩
rw [orbitRel.Quotient.mem_orbit, Quotient.eq''] at yh zh
rcases yh with ⟨g, rfl⟩
rcases zh with ⟨h, rfl⟩
refine ⟨h * g⁻¹, ?_⟩
ext
simp [mul_smul]
variable (G) (α)
local notation "Ω" => orbitRel.Quotient G α
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Finite.of_finite_mulAction_orbitRel_quotient [Finite G] [Finite Ω] : Finite α := by
rw [(selfEquivSigmaOrbits' G _).finite_iff]
have : ∀ g : Ω, Finite g.orbit := by
intro g
induction g using Quotient.inductionOn'
simpa [Set.finite_coe_iff] using Finite.finite_mulAction_orbit _
exact Finite.instSigma
variable (β)
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_le_fst :
orbitRel G (α × β) ≤ (orbitRel G α).comap Prod.fst :=
Setoid.le_def.2 fst_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_le_snd :
orbitRel G (α × β) ≤ (orbitRel G β).comap Prod.snd :=
Setoid.le_def.2 snd_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit
end Orbit
section Stabilizer
variable (G)
variable {G}
/-- If the stabilizer of `a` is `S`, then the stabilizer of `g • a` is `gSg⁻¹`. -/
theorem stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj (g : G) (a : α) :
stabilizer G (g • a) = (stabilizer G a).map (MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom := by
ext h
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff, ← smul_left_cancel_iff g⁻¹, smul_smul, smul_smul, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel, one_smul, ← mem_stabilizer_iff, Subgroup.mem_map_equiv, MulAut.conj_symm_apply]
/-- A bijection between the stabilizers of two elements in the same orbit. -/
noncomputable def stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel {a b : α} (h : orbitRel G α a b) :
stabilizer G a ≃* stabilizer G b :=
let g : G := Classical.choose h
have hg : g • b = a := Classical.choose_spec h
have this : stabilizer G a = (stabilizer G b).map (MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom := by
rw [← hg, stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj]
(MulEquiv.subgroupCongr this).trans ((MulAut.conj g).subgroupMap <| stabilizer G b).symm
end Stabilizer
end MulAction
namespace AddAction
variable {G α : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α]
/-- If the stabilizer of `x` is `S`, then the stabilizer of `g +ᵥ x` is `g + S + (-g)`. -/
theorem stabilizer_vadd_eq_stabilizer_map_conj (g : G) (a : α) :
stabilizer G (g +ᵥ a) = (stabilizer G a).map (AddAut.conj g).toMul.toAddMonoidHom := by
ext h
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff, ← vadd_left_cancel_iff (-g), vadd_vadd, vadd_vadd, vadd_vadd,
neg_add_cancel, zero_vadd, ← mem_stabilizer_iff, AddSubgroup.mem_map_equiv,
AddAut.conj_symm_apply]
/-- A bijection between the stabilizers of two elements in the same orbit. -/
noncomputable def stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel {a b : α} (h : orbitRel G α a b) :
stabilizer G a ≃+ stabilizer G b :=
let g : G := Classical.choose h
have hg : g +ᵥ b = a := Classical.choose_spec h
have this : stabilizer G a = (stabilizer G b).map (AddAut.conj g).toMul.toAddMonoidHom := by
rw [← hg, stabilizer_vadd_eq_stabilizer_map_conj]
(AddEquiv.addSubgroupCongr this).trans ((AddAut.conj g).addSubgroupMap <| stabilizer G b).symm
end AddAction
attribute [to_additive existing] MulAction.stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj
attribute [to_additive existing] MulAction.stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel
theorem Equiv.swap_mem_stabilizer {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {S : Set α} {a b : α} :
Equiv.swap a b ∈ MulAction.stabilizer (Equiv.Perm α) S ↔ (a ∈ S ↔ b ∈ S) := by
rw [MulAction.mem_stabilizer_iff, Set.ext_iff, ← swap_inv]
simp_rw [Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff, Perm.smul_def, swap_apply_def]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa [Iff.comm] using h a, by intros; split_ifs <;> simp [*]⟩
namespace MulAction
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
/-- To prove inclusion of a *subgroup* in a stabilizer, it is enough to prove inclusions. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove inclusion of a *subgroup* in a stabilizer, it is enough to prove inclusions."]
theorem le_stabilizer_iff_smul_le (s : Set α) (H : Subgroup G) :
H ≤ stabilizer G s ↔ ∀ g ∈ H, g • s ⊆ s := by
constructor
· intro hyp g hg
apply Eq.subset
rw [← mem_stabilizer_iff]
exact hyp hg
· intro hyp g hg
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff]
apply subset_antisymm (hyp g hg)
intro x hx
use g⁻¹ • x
constructor
· apply hyp g⁻¹ (inv_mem hg)
simp only [Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff, hx]
· simp only [smul_inv_smul]
end MulAction
section
variable (R M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
variable {M} in
lemma Module.stabilizer_units_eq_bot_of_ne_zero {x : M} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
MulAction.stabilizer Rˣ x = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff]
intro g (hg : g.val • x = x)
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← smul_eq_zero_iff_left hx, Units.val_one, sub_smul, hg, one_smul, sub_self]
end
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Basic.lean | 802 | 806 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 853 | 854 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Data.Option.NAry
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Basic
/-!
# `WithBot`, `WithTop`
Adding a `bot` or a `top` to an order.
## Main declarations
* `With<Top/Bot> α`: Equips `Option α` with the order on `α` plus `none` as the top/bottom element.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
namespace WithBot
variable {a b : α}
instance nontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (WithBot α) :=
Option.nontrivial
open Function
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : α → WithBot α) :=
Option.some_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b :=
Option.some_inj
protected theorem «forall» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∧ ∀ x : α, p x :=
Option.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∨ ∃ x : α, p x :=
Option.exists
theorem none_eq_bot : (none : WithBot α) = (⊥ : WithBot α) :=
rfl
theorem some_eq_coe (a : α) : (Option.some a : WithBot α) = (↑a : WithBot α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_coe : ⊥ ≠ (a : WithBot α) :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_bot : (a : WithBot α) ≠ ⊥ :=
nofun
/-- Specialization of `Option.getD` to values in `WithBot α` that respects API boundaries.
-/
def unbotD (d : α) (x : WithBot α) : α :=
recBotCoe d id x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot' := unbotD
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_bot {α} (d : α) : unbotD d ⊥ = d :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_bot := unbotD_bot
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_coe {α} (d x : α) : unbotD d x = x :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_coe := unbotD_coe
theorem coe_eq_coe : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b := coe_inj
theorem unbotD_eq_iff {d y : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = y ↔ x = y ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction x <;> simp [@eq_comm _ d]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_iff := unbotD_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_eq_self_iff {d : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = d ↔ x = d ∨ x = ⊥ := by
simp [unbotD_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_self_iff := unbotD_eq_self_iff
theorem unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff {d : α} {x y : WithBot α} :
unbotD d x = unbotD d y ↔ x = y ∨ x = d ∧ y = ⊥ ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction y <;> simp [unbotD_eq_iff, or_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_unbot'_iff := unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff
/-- Lift a map `f : α → β` to `WithBot α → WithBot β`. Implemented using `Option.map`. -/
def map (f : α → β) : WithBot α → WithBot β :=
Option.map f
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : α → β) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff {f : α → β} {a : WithBot α} :
map f a = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := Option.map_eq_none_iff
theorem map_eq_some_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
WithBot.map f v = .some y ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := Option.map_eq_some_iff
theorem some_eq_map_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
.some y = WithBot.map f v ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := by
cases v <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ}
(h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂) (a : α) :
map g₁ (map f₁ a) = map g₂ (map f₂ a) :=
Option.map_comm h _
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function
`WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ : (α → β → γ) → WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ := Option.map₂
lemma map₂_coe_coe (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = f a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_bot_left (f : α → β → γ) (b) : map₂ f ⊥ b = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_bot_right (f : α → β → γ) (a) : map₂ f a ⊥ = ⊥ := by cases a <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_coe_left (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b) : map₂ f a b = b.map fun b ↦ f a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_coe_right (f : α → β → γ) (a) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = a.map (f · b) := by
cases a <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_eq_bot_iff {f : α → β → γ} {a : WithBot α} {b : WithBot β} :
map₂ f a b = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ ∨ b = ⊥ := Option.map₂_eq_none_iff
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists {x : WithBot α} : x ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : α, ↑a = x := Option.ne_none_iff_exists
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_ne {x : WithBot α} : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a : α, ↑a ≠ x :=
Option.eq_none_iff_forall_some_ne
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_ne_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_ne
/-- Deconstruct a `x : WithBot α` to the underlying value in `α`, given a proof that `x ≠ ⊥`. -/
def unbot : ∀ x : WithBot α, x ≠ ⊥ → α | (x : α), _ => x
@[simp] lemma coe_unbot : ∀ (x : WithBot α) hx, x.unbot hx = x | (x : α), _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem unbot_coe (x : α) (h : (x : WithBot α) ≠ ⊥ := coe_ne_bot) : (x : WithBot α).unbot h = x :=
rfl
instance canLift : CanLift (WithBot α) α (↑) fun r => r ≠ ⊥ where
prf x h := ⟨x.unbot h, coe_unbot _ _⟩
instance instTop [Top α] : Top (WithBot α) where
top := (⊤ : α)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_top [Top α] : ((⊤ : α) : WithBot α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_top [Top α] {a : α} : (a : WithBot α) = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma top_eq_coe [Top α] {a : α} : ⊤ = (a : WithBot α) ↔ ⊤ = a := coe_eq_coe
theorem unbot_eq_iff {a : WithBot α} {b : α} (h : a ≠ ⊥) :
a.unbot h = b ↔ a = b := by
induction a
· simpa using h rfl
· simp
theorem eq_unbot_iff {a : α} {b : WithBot α} (h : b ≠ ⊥) :
a = b.unbot h ↔ a = b := by
induction b
· simpa using h rfl
· simp
/-- The equivalence between the non-bottom elements of `WithBot α` and `α`. -/
@[simps] def _root_.Equiv.withBotSubtypeNe : {y : WithBot α // y ≠ ⊥} ≃ α where
toFun := fun ⟨x,h⟩ => WithBot.unbot x h
invFun x := ⟨x, WithBot.coe_ne_bot⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
section LE
variable [LE α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance (priority := 10) le : LE (WithBot α) :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => ∀ a : α, o₁ = ↑a → ∃ b : α, o₂ = ↑b ∧ a ≤ b⟩
lemma le_def : x ≤ y ↔ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → ∃ b : α, y = ↑b ∧ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (a : WithBot α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
lemma not_coe_le_bot (a : α) : ¬(a : WithBot α) ≤ ⊥ := by simp [le_def]
instance orderBot : OrderBot (WithBot α) where bot_le := by simp [le_def]
instance orderTop [OrderTop α] : OrderTop (WithBot α) where le_top x := by cases x <;> simp [le_def]
instance instBoundedOrder [OrderTop α] : BoundedOrder (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.orderBot, WithBot.orderTop with }
/-- There is a general version `le_bot_iff`, but this lemma does not require a `PartialOrder`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem le_bot_iff : ∀ {a : WithBot α}, a ≤ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥
| (a : α) => by simp [not_coe_le_bot _]
| ⊥ => by simp
theorem coe_le : ∀ {o : Option α}, b ∈ o → ((a : WithBot α) ≤ o ↔ a ≤ b)
| _, rfl => coe_le_coe
theorem coe_le_iff : a ≤ x ↔ ∃ b : α, x = b ∧ a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
theorem le_coe_iff : x ≤ b ↔ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
protected theorem _root_.IsMax.withBot (h : IsMax a) : IsMax (a : WithBot α) :=
fun x ↦ by cases x <;> simp; simpa using @h _
lemma le_unbot_iff (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : a ≤ unbot y hy ↔ a ≤ y := by lift y to α using id hy; simp
lemma unbot_le_iff (hx : x ≠ ⊥) : unbot x hx ≤ b ↔ x ≤ b := by lift x to α using id hx; simp
lemma unbotD_le_iff (hx : x = ⊥ → a ≤ b) : x.unbotD a ≤ b ↔ x ≤ b := by cases x <;> simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_le_iff := unbotD_le_iff
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance (priority := 10) lt : LT (WithBot α) :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ : WithBot α => ∃ b : α, o₂ = ↑b ∧ ∀ a : α, o₁ = ↑a → a < b⟩
lemma lt_def : x < y ↔ ∃ b : α, y = ↑b ∧ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → a < b := .rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (a : WithBot α) < b ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_def]
@[simp] lemma bot_lt_coe (a : α) : ⊥ < (a : WithBot α) := by simp [lt_def]
@[simp] protected lemma not_lt_bot (a : WithBot α) : ¬a < ⊥ := by simp [lt_def]
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : x < y ↔ ∃ b : α, y = b ∧ x < b := by cases y <;> simp
lemma lt_coe_iff : x < b ↔ ∀ a : α, x = a → a < b := by simp [lt_def]
/-- A version of `bot_lt_iff_ne_bot` for `WithBot` that only requires `LT α`, not
`PartialOrder α`. -/
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : ⊥ < x ↔ x ≠ ⊥ := by cases x <;> simp
lemma lt_unbot_iff (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : a < unbot y hy ↔ a < y := by lift y to α using id hy; simp
lemma unbot_lt_iff (hx : x ≠ ⊥) : unbot x hx < b ↔ x < b := by lift x to α using id hx; simp
lemma unbotD_lt_iff (hx : x = ⊥ → a < b) : x.unbotD a < b ↔ x < b := by cases x <;> simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_lt_iff := unbotD_lt_iff
end LT
instance preorder [Preorder α] : Preorder (WithBot α) where
lt_iff_le_not_le x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl x := by cases x <;> simp [le_def]
le_trans x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp [le_def]; simpa using le_trans
instance partialOrder [PartialOrder α] : PartialOrder (WithBot α) where
le_antisymm x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [le_def]; simpa using le_antisymm
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {x y : WithBot α}
theorem coe_strictMono : StrictMono (fun (a : α) => (a : WithBot α)) := fun _ _ => coe_lt_coe.2
theorem coe_mono : Monotone (fun (a : α) => (a : WithBot α)) := fun _ _ => coe_le_coe.2
theorem monotone_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
Monotone f ↔ Monotone (fun a ↦ f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f ⊥ ≤ f x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.comp WithBot.coe_mono, fun _ ↦ h bot_le⟩, fun h ↦
WithBot.forall.2
⟨WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun _ => le_rfl, fun x _ => h.2 x⟩, fun _ =>
WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun h => (not_coe_le_bot _ h).elim,
fun _ hle => h.1 (coe_le_coe.1 hle)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem monotone_map_iff {f : α → β} : Monotone (WithBot.map f) ↔ Monotone f :=
monotone_iff.trans <| by simp [Monotone]
alias ⟨_, _root_.Monotone.withBot_map⟩ := monotone_map_iff
theorem strictMono_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
StrictMono f ↔ StrictMono (fun a => f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f ⊥ < f x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.comp WithBot.coe_strictMono, fun _ => h (bot_lt_coe _)⟩, fun h =>
WithBot.forall.2
⟨WithBot.forall.2 ⟨flip absurd (lt_irrefl _), fun x _ => h.2 x⟩, fun _ =>
WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun h => (not_lt_bot h).elim, fun _ hle => h.1 (coe_lt_coe.1 hle)⟩⟩⟩
theorem strictAnti_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
StrictAnti f ↔ StrictAnti (fun a ↦ f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f x < f ⊥ :=
strictMono_iff (β := βᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem strictMono_map_iff {f : α → β} :
StrictMono (WithBot.map f) ↔ StrictMono f :=
strictMono_iff.trans <| by simp [StrictMono, bot_lt_coe]
alias ⟨_, _root_.StrictMono.withBot_map⟩ := strictMono_map_iff
lemma map_le_iff (f : α → β) (mono_iff : ∀ {a b}, f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b) :
x.map f ≤ y.map f ↔ x ≤ y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [mono_iff]
theorem le_coe_unbotD (x : WithBot α) (b : α) : x ≤ x.unbotD b := by cases x <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias le_coe_unbot' := le_coe_unbotD
@[simp]
theorem lt_coe_bot [OrderBot α] : x < (⊥ : α) ↔ x = ⊥ := by cases x <;> simp
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_lt : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b : α, x < b := by
cases x <;> simp; simpa using ⟨_, lt_irrefl _⟩
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_le [NoBotOrder α] : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b : α, x ≤ b := by
refine ⟨by simp +contextual, fun h ↦ (x.eq_bot_iff_forall_ne).2 fun y => ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact not_isBot y fun z => coe_le_coe.1 (h z)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_lt_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_le_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_le
lemma forall_le_coe_iff_le [NoBotOrder α] : (∀ a : α, y ≤ a → x ≤ a) ↔ x ≤ y := by
obtain _ | y := y
· simp [WithBot.none_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff_forall_le]
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ h _ le_rfl, fun hmn a ham ↦ hmn.trans ham⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [NoBotOrder α] {x y : WithBot α}
lemma eq_of_forall_le_coe_iff (h : ∀ a : α, x ≤ a ↔ y ≤ a) : x = y :=
le_antisymm (forall_le_coe_iff_le.mp fun a ↦ (h a).2) (forall_le_coe_iff_le.mp fun a ↦ (h a).1)
end PartialOrder
instance semilatticeSup [SemilatticeSup α] : SemilatticeSup (WithBot α) where
sup
-- note this is `Option.merge`, but with the right defeq when unfolding
| ⊥, ⊥ => ⊥
| (a : α), ⊥ => a
| ⊥, (b : α) => b
| (a : α), (b : α) => ↑(a ⊔ b)
le_sup_left x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
le_sup_right x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
sup_le x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp; simpa using sup_le
theorem coe_sup [SemilatticeSup α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊔ b : α) : WithBot α) = (a : WithBot α) ⊔ b :=
rfl
instance semilatticeInf [SemilatticeInf α] : SemilatticeInf (WithBot α) where
inf := .map₂ (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
inf_le_right x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
le_inf x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp; simpa using le_inf
theorem coe_inf [SemilatticeInf α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊓ b : α) : WithBot α) = (a : WithBot α) ⊓ b :=
rfl
instance lattice [Lattice α] : Lattice (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.semilatticeSup, WithBot.semilatticeInf with }
instance distribLattice [DistribLattice α] : DistribLattice (WithBot α) where
le_sup_inf x y z := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp [← coe_inf, ← coe_sup]
simpa [← coe_inf, ← coe_sup] using le_sup_inf
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (WithBot α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (Option α)
instance decidableLE [LE α] [DecidableLE α] : DecidableLE (WithBot α)
| ⊥, _ => isTrue <| by simp
| (a : α), ⊥ => isFalse <| by simp
| (a : α), (b : α) => decidable_of_iff' _ coe_le_coe
instance decidableLT [LT α] [DecidableLT α] : DecidableLT (WithBot α)
| _, ⊥ => isFalse <| by simp
| ⊥, (a : α) => isTrue <| by simp
| (a : α), (b : α) => decidable_of_iff' _ coe_lt_coe
instance isTotal_le [LE α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] : IsTotal (WithBot α) (· ≤ ·) where
total x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp; simpa using IsTotal.total ..
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (WithBot α) := Lattice.toLinearOrder _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_min (a b : α) : ↑(min a b) = min (a : WithBot α) b := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_max (a b : α) : ↑(max a b) = max (a : WithBot α) b := rfl
variable [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α]
lemma le_of_forall_lt_iff_le : (∀ z : α, x < z → y ≤ z) ↔ y ≤ x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [exists_lt, forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense]
lemma ge_of_forall_gt_iff_ge : (∀ z : α, z < x → z ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [exists_lt, forall_lt_imp_le_iff_le_of_dense]
end LinearOrder
instance instWellFoundedLT [LT α] [WellFoundedLT α] : WellFoundedLT (WithBot α) where
wf := .intro fun
| ⊥ => ⟨_, by simp⟩
| (a : α) => (wellFounded_lt.1 a).rec fun _ _ ih ↦ .intro _ fun
| ⊥, _ => ⟨_, by simp⟩
| (b : α), hlt => ih _ (coe_lt_coe.1 hlt)
instance _root_.WithBot.instWellFoundedGT [LT α] [WellFoundedGT α] : WellFoundedGT (WithBot α) where
wf :=
have acc_some (a : α) : Acc ((· > ·) : WithBot α → WithBot α → Prop) a :=
(wellFounded_gt.1 a).rec fun _ _ ih =>
.intro _ fun
| (b : α), hlt => ih _ (coe_lt_coe.1 hlt)
.intro fun
| | (a : α) => acc_some a
| ⊥ => .intro _ fun | (b : α), _ => acc_some b
| Mathlib/Order/WithBot.lean | 435 | 437 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
/-!
# Rotations by oriented angles.
This file defines rotations by oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.rotation` is the rotation by an oriented angle with respect to an orientation.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
/-- Auxiliary construction to build a rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
/-- A rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply]
module
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply]
module
· simp)
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear map) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V := nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear equiv) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
/-- The inverse of `rotation` is rotation by the negation of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Rotation by 0 is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
/-- Rotation by π / 2 is the "right-angle-rotation" map `J`. -/
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation]
module
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
/-- Rotating the first of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos θ - sin θ * I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.toCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_toCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_toCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
/-- Negating a rotation is equivalent to rotation by π plus the angle. -/
theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
/-- Negating a rotation by -π / 2 is equivalent to rotation by π / 2. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two (x : V) :
-o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x := by
rw [neg_rotation, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half]
/-- Negating a rotation by π / 2 is equivalent to rotation by -π / 2. -/
theorem neg_rotation_pi_div_two (x : V) : -o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x :=
(neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp <| o.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two _).symm
/-- Rotating the first of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos (-θ) + sin (-θ) * I`.
-/
theorem kahler_rotation_left' (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = (-θ).toCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [Real.Angle.toCircle_neg, Circle.coe_inv_eq_conj, kahler_rotation_left]
/-- Rotating the second of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos θ + sin θ * I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_right (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler x (o.rotation θ y) = θ.toCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, real_smul,
kahler_rightAngleRotation_right, Real.Angle.coe_toCircle]
ring
/-- Rotating the first vector by `θ` subtracts `θ` from the angle between two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) y = o.oangle x y - θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_left']
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_toCircle]
· abel
· exact Circle.coe_ne_zero _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Rotating the second vector by `θ` adds `θ` to the angle between two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y + θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_right]
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_toCircle]
· abel
· exact Circle.coe_ne_zero _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The rotation of a vector by `θ` has an angle of `-θ` from that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) x = -θ := by simp [hx]
/-- A vector has an angle of `θ` from the rotation of that vector by `θ`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ x) = θ := by simp [hx]
/-- Rotating the first vector by the angle between the two vectors results in an angle of 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) y = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [hx, hy]
/-- Rotating the first vector by the angle between the two vectors and swapping the vectors
results in an angle of 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_right (x y : V) : o.oangle y (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev]
simp
/-- Rotating both vectors by the same angle does not change the angle between those vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- A rotation of a nonzero vector equals that vector if and only if the angle is zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.rotation θ x = x ↔ θ = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [eq_comm]
simpa [hx, h] using o.oangle_rotation_right hx hx θ
· intro h
simp [h]
/-- A nonzero vector equals a rotation of that vector if and only if the angle is zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
x = o.rotation θ x ↔ θ = 0 := by rw [← o.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero hx, eq_comm]
/-- A rotation of a vector equals that vector if and only if the vector or the angle is zero. -/
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : o.rotation θ x = x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- A vector equals a rotation of that vector if and only if the vector or the angle is zero. -/
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : x = o.rotation θ x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
rw [← rotation_eq_self_iff, eq_comm]
/-- Rotating a vector by the angle to another vector gives the second vector if and only if the
norms are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq (x y : V) : o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· intro h
rw [o.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq] <;> simp [h]
/-- The angle between two nonzero vectors is `θ` if and only if the second vector is the first
rotated by `θ` and scaled by the ratio of the norms. -/
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(θ : Real.Angle) : o.oangle x y = θ ↔ y = (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) • o.rotation θ x := by
have hp := div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)
constructor
· rintro rfl
rw [← LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, ← o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos x y hp, eq_comm,
rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hp.le,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)]
· intro hye
rw [hye, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hp, o.oangle_rotation_self_right hx]
/-- The angle between two nonzero vectors is `θ` if and only if the second vector is the first
rotated by `θ` and scaled by a positive real. -/
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
| (θ : Real.Angle) : o.oangle x y = θ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • o.rotation θ x := by
constructor
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 297 | 298 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linter.DeprecatedModule
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/GroupWithZero/Unbundled.lean | 670 | 672 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
theorem rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| a :: l, 0, m => by simp
| [], n, m => by simp
| a :: l, n + 1, m => by
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate' _ n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← rotate'_cons_succ,
Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length (l : List α) : rotate' l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate'_eq_drop_append_take le_rfl]; simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length_mul (l : List α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length := by
simp [-rotate'_length, Nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
_ = l := by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul l n]
theorem rotate'_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc
l.rotate' (n % l.length) =
(l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate' ((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) :=
by rw [rotate'_length_mul]
_ = l.rotate' n := by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp_all [length_eq_zero_iff]
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod,
rotate'_eq_drop_append_take (le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))]
simp [rotate]
@[simp] theorem rotate_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate (n + 1) = (l ++ [a]).rotate n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rotate : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [], _, n => by simp
| a :: l, _, 0 => by simp
| a :: l, _, n + 1 => by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or_comm]
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_replicate (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : (replicate n a).rotate k = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate_iff.2 ⟨by rw [length_rotate, length_replicate], fun b hb =>
eq_of_mem_replicate <| mem_rotate.1 hb⟩
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ l.length → l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']; exact rotate'_eq_drop_append_take
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l.drop (n % l.length) ++ l.take (n % l.length) := by
rcases l.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· simp [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm]
rw [← rotate_eq_drop_append_take (n.mod_lt hl).le, rotate_mod]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_append_length_eq (l l' : List α) : (l ++ l').rotate l.length = l' ++ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction l generalizing l'
· simp
· simp_all [rotate']
theorem rotate_rotate (l : List α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length (l : List α) : rotate l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length_mul (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
theorem rotate_perm (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate'_cons_succ]
exact (hn _).trans (perm_append_singleton _ _)
@[simp]
theorem nodup_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : Nodup (l.rotate n) ↔ Nodup l :=
(rotate_perm l n).nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [rotate_cons_succ, hn]
theorem nil_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : [] = l.rotate n ↔ [] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : [x].rotate n = [x] :=
rotate_replicate x 1 n
theorem zipWith_rotate_distrib {β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) (l' : List β) (n : ℕ)
(h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zipWith f l l').rotate n = zipWith f (l.rotate n) (l'.rotate n) := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod,
rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, h, zipWith_append, ← drop_zipWith, ←
take_zipWith, List.length_zipWith, h, min_self]
rw [length_drop, length_drop, h]
theorem zipWith_rotate_one {β : Type*} (f : α → α → β) (x y : α) (l : List α) :
zipWith f (x :: y :: l) ((x :: y :: l).rotate 1) = f x y :: zipWith f (y :: l) (l ++ [x]) := by
simp
theorem getElem?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n)[m]? = l[(m + n) % l.length]? := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod]
rcases lt_or_le m (l.drop (n % l.length)).length with hm | hm
· rw [getElem?_append_left hm, getElem?_drop, ← add_mod_mod]
rw [length_drop, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hm
rw [mod_eq_of_lt hm, Nat.add_comm]
· have hlt : n % length l < length l := mod_lt _ (m.zero_le.trans_lt hml)
rw [getElem?_append_right hm, getElem?_take_of_lt, length_drop]
· congr 1
rw [length_drop] at hm
have hm' := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 hm
have : n % length l + m - length l < length l := by
rw [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add hm']
exact Nat.add_lt_add hlt hml
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm m, ← mod_add_mod, mod_eq_sub_mod hm', mod_eq_of_lt this]
omega
· rwa [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add' hm, length_drop, Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le]
theorem getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (h : k < (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n)[k] =
l[(k + n) % l.length]'(mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_rotate]
exact h.trans_eq (length_rotate _ _)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated getElem?_rotate (since := "2025-02-14")]
theorem get?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n).get? m = l.get? ((m + n) % l.length) := by
simp only [get?_eq_getElem?, length_rotate, hml, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_rotate]
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
theorem get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n).get k = l.get ⟨(k + n) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.pos)⟩ := by
simp [getElem_rotate]
theorem head?_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) : head? (l.rotate n) = l[n]? := by
rw [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_rotate (n.zero_le.trans_lt h), Nat.zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem get_rotate_one (l : List α) (k : Fin (l.rotate 1).length) :
(l.rotate 1).get k = l.get ⟨(k + 1) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l 1 ▸ k.pos)⟩ :=
get_rotate l 1 k
/-- A version of `List.getElem_rotate` that represents `l[k]` in terms of
`(List.rotate l n)[⋯]`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.getElem_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem getElem_eq_getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (hk : k < l.length) :
l[k] = ((l.rotate n)[(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length]'
((Nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm)) := by
rw [getElem_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [hk, (mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).le]
/-- A version of `List.get_rotate` that represents `List.get l` in terms of
`List.get (List.rotate l n)`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.get_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem get_eq_get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin l.length) :
l.get k = (l.rotate n).get ⟨(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length,
(Nat.mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm⟩ := by
rw [get_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [k.2, (mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).le]
theorem rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [hα : Nonempty α] :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = replicate l.length a
| [] => by simp
| a :: l => ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ext_getElem length_replicate.symm fun n h₁ h₂ => by
rw [getElem_replicate, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← head?_rotate h₁, h,
head?_cons]⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ n => by rw [hb, rotate_replicate]⟩
theorem rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [Nonempty α] {l : List α} :
l.rotate 1 = l ↔ ∃ a : α, l = List.replicate l.length a :=
⟨fun h =>
rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp fun n =>
Nat.rec l.rotate_zero (fun n hn => by rwa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← l.rotate_rotate, hn]) n,
fun h => rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mpr h 1⟩
theorem rotate_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun l : List α => l.rotate n := by
rintro l l' (h : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n)
have hle : l.length = l'.length := (l.length_rotate n).symm.trans (h.symm ▸ l'.length_rotate n)
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod] at h
obtain ⟨hd, ht⟩ := append_inj h (by simp_all)
rw [← take_append_drop _ l, ht, hd, take_append_drop]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n ↔ l = l' :=
(rotate_injective n).eq_iff
theorem rotate_eq_iff {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l' ↔ l = l'.rotate (l'.length - n % l'.length) := by
rw [← @rotate_eq_rotate _ l _ n, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod l', add_mod]
rcases l'.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm, rotate_nil]
· rcases (Nat.zero_le (n % l'.length)).eq_or_lt with hn | hn
· simp [← hn]
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt hl hn), Nat.sub_add_cancel, mod_self, rotate_zero]
exact (Nat.mod_lt _ hl).le
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_singleton_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : l.rotate n = [x] ↔ l = [x] := by
rw [rotate_eq_iff, rotate_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : [x] = l.rotate n ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem reverse_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
(l.rotate n).reverse = l.reverse.rotate (l.length - n % l.length) := by
rw [← length_reverse, ← rotate_eq_iff]
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate_cons_succ, ← rotate_rotate, hn]
simp
theorem rotate_reverse (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
l.reverse.rotate n = (l.rotate (l.length - n % l.length)).reverse := by
rw [← reverse_reverse l]
simp_rw [reverse_rotate, reverse_reverse, rotate_eq_iff, rotate_rotate, length_rotate,
length_reverse]
rw [← length_reverse]
let k := n % l.reverse.length
rcases hk' : k with - | k'
· simp_all! [k, length_reverse, ← rotate_rotate]
· rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· simp
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.sub_add_cancel, rotate_length]
· exact Nat.sub_le _ _
· exact Nat.sub_lt (by simp) (by simp_all! [k])
theorem map_rotate {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
map f (l.rotate n) = (map f l).rotate n := by
induction' n with n hn IH generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [hn]
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (hn : l ≠ []) (i j : ℕ)
(h : l.rotate i = l.rotate j) : i % l.length = j % l.length := by
rw [← rotate_mod l i, ← rotate_mod l j] at h
simpa only [head?_rotate, mod_lt, length_pos_of_ne_nil hn, getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj,
hl.getElem_inj_iff, Fin.ext_iff] using congr_arg head? h
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {i j : ℕ} :
l.rotate i = l.rotate j ↔ i % l.length = j % l.length ∨ l = [] := by
rcases eq_or_ne l [] with rfl | hn
· simp
· simp only [hn, or_false]
refine ⟨hl.rotate_congr hn _ _, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← rotate_mod, h, rotate_mod]
theorem Nodup.rotate_eq_self_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l ↔ n % l.length = 0 ∨ l = [] := by
rw [← zero_mod, ← hl.rotate_congr_iff, rotate_zero]
section IsRotated
variable (l l' : List α)
/-- `IsRotated l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~r l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are cyclic permutations
of each other. This is defined by claiming that `∃ n, l.rotate n = l'`. -/
def IsRotated : Prop :=
∃ n, l.rotate n = l'
@[inherit_doc List.IsRotated]
-- This matches the precedence of the infix `~` for `List.Perm`, and of other relation infixes
infixr:50 " ~r " => IsRotated
variable {l l'}
@[refl]
theorem IsRotated.refl (l : List α) : l ~r l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
@[symm]
theorem IsRotated.symm (h : l ~r l') : l' ~r l := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· exists 0
· use (hd :: tl).length * n - n
rw [rotate_rotate, Nat.add_sub_cancel', rotate_length_mul]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (by simp)
theorem isRotated_comm : l ~r l' ↔ l' ~r l :=
⟨IsRotated.symm, IsRotated.symm⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem IsRotated.forall (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~r l :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[trans]
theorem IsRotated.trans : ∀ {l l' l'' : List α}, l ~r l' → l' ~r l'' → l ~r l''
| _, _, _, ⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩ => ⟨n + m, by rw [rotate_rotate]⟩
theorem IsRotated.eqv : Equivalence (@IsRotated α) :=
Equivalence.mk IsRotated.refl IsRotated.symm IsRotated.trans
/-- The relation `List.IsRotated l l'` forms a `Setoid` of cycles. -/
def IsRotated.setoid (α : Type*) : Setoid (List α) where
r := IsRotated
iseqv := IsRotated.eqv
theorem IsRotated.perm (h : l ~r l') : l ~ l' :=
Exists.elim h fun _ hl => hl ▸ (rotate_perm _ _).symm
theorem IsRotated.nodup_iff (h : l ~r l') : Nodup l ↔ Nodup l' :=
h.perm.nodup_iff
theorem IsRotated.mem_iff (h : l ~r l') {a : α} : a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ l' :=
h.perm.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff : l ~r [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff' : [] ~r l ↔ [] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff {x : α} : l ~r [x] ↔ l = [x] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff' {x : α} : [x] ~r l ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem isRotated_concat (hd : α) (tl : List α) : (tl ++ [hd]) ~r (hd :: tl) :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨1, by simp⟩
theorem isRotated_append : (l ++ l') ~r (l' ++ l) :=
⟨l.length, by simp⟩
theorem IsRotated.reverse (h : l ~r l') : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, (reverse_rotate _ _).symm⟩
theorem isRotated_reverse_comm_iff : l.reverse ~r l' ↔ l ~r l'.reverse := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
simpa using h.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_reverse_iff : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse ↔ l ~r l' := by
simp [isRotated_reverse_comm_iff]
theorem isRotated_iff_mod : l ~r l' ↔ ∃ n ≤ l.length, l.rotate n = l' := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, _, h⟩ => ⟨n, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· refine ⟨n % (hd :: tl).length, ?_, rotate_mod _ _⟩
refine (Nat.mod_lt _ ?_).le
simp
theorem isRotated_iff_mem_map_range : l ~r l' ↔ l' ∈ (List.range (l.length + 1)).map l.rotate := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, isRotated_iff_mod]
exact
⟨fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hn, h⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn, h⟩⟩
theorem IsRotated.map {β : Type*} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ~r l₂) (f : α → β) :
map f l₁ ~r map f l₂ := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rw [map_rotate]
use n
theorem IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast
(L : List α) (hL : L ≠ []) : L.getLast hL :: L.dropLast ~r L := by
induction L using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => simp at hL
| append_singleton a L _ =>
simp only [getLast_append, dropLast_concat]
apply IsRotated.symm
apply isRotated_concat
theorem IsRotated.dropLast_tail {α}
{L : List α} (hL : L ≠ []) (hL' : L.head hL = L.getLast hL) : L.dropLast ~r L.tail :=
match L with
| [] => by simp
| [_] => by simp
| a :: b :: L => by
simp only [head_cons, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, getLast_cons] at hL'
simp [hL', IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast]
/-- List of all cyclic permutations of `l`.
The `cyclicPermutations` of a nonempty list `l` will always contain `List.length l` elements.
This implies that under certain conditions, there are duplicates in `List.cyclicPermutations l`.
The `n`th entry is equal to `l.rotate n`, proven in `List.get_cyclicPermutations`.
The proof that every cyclic permutant of `l` is in the list is `List.mem_cyclicPermutations_iff`.
cyclicPermutations [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] =
[[1, 2, 3, 2, 4], [2, 3, 2, 4, 1], [3, 2, 4, 1, 2],
[2, 4, 1, 2, 3], [4, 1, 2, 3, 2]] -/
def cyclicPermutations : List α → List (List α)
| [] => [[]]
| l@(_ :: _) => dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails l) (inits l))
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_nil : cyclicPermutations ([] : List α) = [[]] :=
rfl
theorem cyclicPermutations_cons (x : α) (l : List α) :
| cyclicPermutations (x :: l) = dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails (x :: l)) (inits (x :: l))) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 499 | 500 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Box
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.EisensteinSeries.Defs
/-!
# Uniform convergence of Eisenstein series
We show that the sum of `eisSummand` converges locally uniformly on `ℍ` to the Eisenstein series
of weight `k` and level `Γ(N)` with congruence condition `a : Fin 2 → ZMod N`.
## Outline of argument
The key lemma `r_mul_max_le` shows that, for `z ∈ ℍ` and `c, d ∈ ℤ` (not both zero),
`|c z + d|` is bounded below by `r z * max (|c|, |d|)`, where `r z` is an explicit function of `z`
(independent of `c, d`) satisfying `0 < r z < 1` for all `z`.
We then show in `summable_one_div_rpow_max` that the sum of `max (|c|, |d|) ^ (-k)` over
`(c, d) ∈ ℤ × ℤ` is convergent for `2 < k`. This is proved by decomposing `ℤ × ℤ` using the
`Finset.box` lemmas.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex UpperHalfPlane Set Finset CongruenceSubgroup Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane
variable (z : ℍ)
namespace EisensteinSeries
lemma norm_eq_max_natAbs (x : Fin 2 → ℤ) : ‖x‖ = max (x 0).natAbs (x 1).natAbs := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_natCast, NNReal.coe_inj, Nat.cast_max]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ ?_
simp only [pi_nnnorm_le_iff, Fin.forall_fin_two, max_le_iff, NNReal.natCast_natAbs]
section bounding_functions
/-- Auxiliary function used for bounding Eisenstein series, defined as
`z.im ^ 2 / (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2)`. -/
def r1 : ℝ := z.im ^ 2 / (z.re ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2)
lemma r1_eq : r1 z = 1 / ((z.re / z.im) ^ 2 + 1) := by
rw [div_pow, div_add_one (by positivity), one_div_div, r1]
| lemma r1_pos : 0 < r1 z := by
dsimp only [r1]
positivity
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/EisensteinSeries/UniformConvergence.lean | 55 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
variable (R S) in
@[simp]
theorem aroots_map (p : T[X]) [CommRing S] [Algebra T S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower T S R] :
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).aroots R = p.aroots R := by
rw [aroots_def, aroots_def, map_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq T S R]
/-- The set of distinct roots of `p` in `S`.
If you have a non-separable polynomial, use `Polynomial.aroots` for the multiset
where multiple roots have the appropriate multiplicity. -/
def rootSet (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Set S :=
haveI := Classical.decEq S
(p.aroots S).toFinset
theorem rootSet_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [DecidableEq S] :
p.rootSet S = (p.aroots S).toFinset := by
rw [rootSet]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).rootSet S = ∅ := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, aroots_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.coe_empty]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_0, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_one (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (1 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_1, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_neg (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(-p).rootSet S = p.rootSet S := by
rw [rootSet, aroots_neg, rootSet]
instance rootSetFintype (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
| Fintype (p.rootSet S) :=
FinsetCoe.fintype _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 514 | 516 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.