Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Constructions
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Bases of topologies. Countability axioms.
A topological basis on a topological space `t` is a collection of sets,
such that all open sets can be generated as unions of these sets, without the need to take
finite intersections of them. This file introduces a framework for dealing with these collections,
and also what more we can say under certain countability conditions on bases,
which are referred to as first- and second-countable.
We also briefly cover the theory of separable spaces, which are those with a countable, dense
subset. If a space is second-countable, and also has a countably generated uniformity filter
(for example, if `t` is a metric space), it will automatically be separable (and indeed, these
conditions are equivalent in this case).
## Main definitions
* `TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis s`: The topological space `t` has basis `s`.
* `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace α`: The topological space `t` has a countable, dense subset.
* `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s`: The set `s` is contained in the closure of a countable set.
* `FirstCountableTopology α`: A topology in which `𝓝 x` is countably generated for
every `x`.
* `SecondCountableTopology α`: A topology which has a topological basis which is
countable.
## Main results
* `TopologicalSpace.FirstCountableTopology.tendsto_subseq`: In a first-countable space,
cluster points are limits of subsequences.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.isOpen_iUnion_countable`: In a second-countable space,
the union of arbitrarily-many open sets is equal to a sub-union of only countably many of these
sets.
* `TopologicalSpace.SecondCountableTopology.countable_cover_nhds`: Consider `f : α → Set α` with the
property that `f x ∈ 𝓝 x` for all `x`. Then there is some countable set `s` whose image covers
the space.
## Implementation Notes
For our applications we are interested that there exists a countable basis, but we do not need the
concrete basis itself. This allows us to declare these type classes as `Prop` to use them as mixins.
## TODO
More fine grained instances for `FirstCountableTopology`,
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`, and more.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology
noncomputable section
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
/-- A topological basis is one that satisfies the necessary conditions so that
it suffices to take unions of the basis sets to get a topology (without taking
finite intersections as well). -/
structure IsTopologicalBasis (s : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
/-- For every point `x`, the set of `t ∈ s` such that `x ∈ t` is directed downwards. -/
exists_subset_inter : ∀ t₁ ∈ s, ∀ t₂ ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃ ∈ s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂
/-- The sets from `s` cover the whole space. -/
sUnion_eq : ⋃₀ s = univ
/-- The topology is generated by sets from `s`. -/
eq_generateFrom : t = generateFrom s
/-- If a family of sets `s` generates the topology, then intersections of finite
subcollections of `s` form a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : t = generateFrom s) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun f => ⋂₀ f) '' { f : Set (Set α) | f.Finite ∧ f ⊆ s }) := by
subst t; letI := generateFrom s
refine ⟨?_, ?_, le_antisymm (le_generateFrom ?_) <| generateFrom_anti fun t ht => ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b⟩, rfl⟩ x h
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b⟩, sInter_union t₁ t₂⟩, h, Subset.rfl⟩
· rw [sUnion_image, iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff]
exact fun x => ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩, sInter_empty.substr <| mem_univ x⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb⟩, rfl⟩
exact hft.isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ GenerateOpen.basic _ <| htb hs
· rw [← sInter_singleton t]
exact ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩, rfl⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom s)
(hsi : FiniteInter s) : IsTopologicalBasis s := by
convert isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis hsg
refine le_antisymm (fun t ht ↦ ⟨{t}, by simpa using ht⟩) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g, ⟨hg, hgs⟩, rfl⟩
lift g to Finset (Set α) using hg
exact hsi.finiteInter_mem g hgs
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_inter {r : Set (Set α)} (hsg : t = generateFrom r)
(hsi : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ r → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ r → s ∩ t ∈ r) : IsTopologicalBasis (insert univ r) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis_of_finiteInter (by simpa using hsg) (FiniteInter.mk₂ hsi)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_hasBasis_nhds {s : Set (Set α)}
(h_nhds : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t ↦ t ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t) id) : IsTopologicalBasis s where
exists_subset_inter t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx := by
simpa only [and_assoc, (h_nhds x).mem_iff]
using (inter_mem ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₁, hx.1⟩) ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₂, hx.2⟩))
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x ↦ (h_nhds x).ex_mem
eq_generateFrom := ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
simpa only [nhds_generateFrom, and_comm] using (h_nhds x).eq_biInf
/-- If a family of open sets `s` is such that every open neighbourhood contains some
member of `s`, then `s` is a topological basis. -/
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds {s : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, IsOpen u)
(h_nhds : ∀ (a : α) (u : Set α), a ∈ u → IsOpen u → ∃ v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
IsTopologicalBasis s :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds <| fun a ↦
(nhds_basis_opens a).to_hasBasis' (by simpa [and_assoc] using h_nhds a)
fun _ ⟨hts, hat⟩ ↦ (h_open _ hts).mem_nhds hat
/-- A set `s` is in the neighbourhood of `a` iff there is some basis set `t`, which
contains `a` and is itself contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom, nhds_generateFrom, biInf_sets_eq]
· simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
· rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩
exact ⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_left),
le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_right)⟩
· rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by simp [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, hb.mem_nhds_iff]
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_isOpen_of_subset {s s' : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s', IsOpen u)
(hs : IsTopologicalBasis s) (hss' : s ⊆ s') : IsTopologicalBasis s' :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds h_open fun a _ ha u_open ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := hs.isOpen_iff.mp u_open a ha; ⟨t, hss' hts, ht⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t : Set α => t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) fun t => t :=
⟨fun s => hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [and_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : IsOpen s := by
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom]
exact .basic s hs
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (insert ∅ s) :=
h.of_isOpen_of_subset (by rintro _ (rfl | hu); exacts [isOpen_empty, h.isOpen hu])
(subset_insert ..)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (s \ {∅}) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun _ hu ↦ h.isOpen hu.1) fun a _ ha hu ↦
have ⟨t, hts, ht⟩ := h.isOpen_iff.mp hu a ha
⟨t, ⟨hts, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' ht.1 <| not_mem_empty _⟩, ht⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) (ha : a ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
(hb.isOpen hs).mem_nhds ha
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b)
{a : α} {u : Set α} (au : a ∈ u) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 <| IsOpen.mem_nhds ou au
/-- Any open set is the union of the basis sets contained in it. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : u = ⋃₀ { s ∈ B | s ⊆ u } :=
ext fun _a =>
⟨fun ha =>
let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou
⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_b, ⟨_, bu⟩, ab⟩ => bu ab⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }, fun _ h => h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} : IsOpen u ↔ ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨hB.open_eq_sUnion, fun ⟨_S, hSB, hu⟩ => hu.symm ▸ isOpen_sUnion fun _s hs => hB.isOpen (hSB hs)⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → Set α), (u = ⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥({ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }), (↑), by
rw [← sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou, fun s => And.left s.2⟩
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.subset_of_forall_subset {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t) : s ⊆ t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs]; simpa [sUnion_subset_iff]
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.eq_of_forall_subset_iff {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s ↔ U ⊆ t) : s = t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ht]
exact congr_arg _ (Set.ext fun U ↦ and_congr_right <| h _)
/-- A point `a` is in the closure of `s` iff all basis sets containing `a` intersect `s`. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α}
{a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_hasBasis).trans <| by simp only [and_imp]
/-- A set is dense iff it has non-trivial intersection with all basis sets. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, Set.Nonempty o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp only [Dense, hb.mem_closure_iff]
exact ⟨fun h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩ => h a o hb ha, fun h a o hb ha => h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set α)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun H o ho => H _ (hB.isOpen ho), fun hf o ho => ?_⟩
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' ho, sUnion_eq_iUnion, image_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun s => hf s s.2.1
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset {B : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} (hu : u.Nonempty) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ B, Set.Nonempty v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hu
let ⟨v, vB, xv, vu⟩ := hb.exists_subset_of_mem_open hx ou
⟨v, vB, ⟨x, xv⟩, vu⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_opens : IsTopologicalBasis { U : Set α | IsOpen U } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by tauto) (by tauto)
protected lemma IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {T : Set (Set β)}
(hf : IsInducing f) (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) : IsTopologicalBasis ((preimage f) '' T) :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ by
convert (hf.basis_nhds (h.nhds_hasBasis (a := f a))).to_image_id with s
aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsTopologicalBasis.inducing := IsTopologicalBasis.isInducing
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.induced {α} [s : TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{T : Set (Set β)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f s) ((preimage f) '' T) :=
h.isInducing (t := induced f s) (.induced f)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {B₁ B₂ : Set (Set β)}
(h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁) B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₂) B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁ ⊓ t₂) (image2 (· ∩ ·) B₁ B₂) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds (t := ?_) fun a ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_inf (t₁ := t₁)]
convert ((h₁.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₁)).inf (h₂.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₂))).to_image_id
aesop
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf_induced {γ} [s : TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) (f₁ : γ → α)
(f₂ : γ → β) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f₁ t ⊓ induced f₂ s) (image2 (f₁ ⁻¹' · ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' ·) B₁ B₂) := by
simpa only [image2_image_left, image2_image_right] using (h₁.induced f₁).inf (h₂.induced f₂)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.prod {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) B₁ B₂) :=
h₁.inf_induced h₂ Prod.fst Prod.snd
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → Set α} (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
(Uc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) {b : ∀ i, Set (Set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (b i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' b i) := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun u hu => ?_) ?_
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩
exact (Uo i).isOpenMap_subtype_val _ ((hb i).isOpen sb)
· intro a u ha uo
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open ha (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_val) with
⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩
exact ⟨(↑) '' v, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{B : Set (Set β)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [hB.eq_generateFrom, continuous_generateFrom_iff]
@[simp] lemma isTopologicalBasis_empty : IsTopologicalBasis (∅ : Set (Set α)) ↔ IsEmpty α where
mp h := by simpa using h.sUnion_eq.symm
mpr h := ⟨by simp, by simp [Set.univ_eq_empty_iff.2], Subsingleton.elim ..⟩
variable (α)
/-- A separable space is one with a countable dense subset, available through
`TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense`. If `α` is also known to be nonempty, then
`TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` provides a sequence `ℕ → α` with dense range, see
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` is a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter (e.g., an `EMetricSpace`), then
this condition is equivalent to `SecondCountableTopology α`. In this case the
latter should be used as a typeclass argument in theorems because Lean can automatically deduce
`TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace` from `SecondCountableTopology` but it can't
deduce `SecondCountableTopology` from `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace`.
Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: the previous paragraph describes the state of the art in Lean 3.
We can have instance cycles in Lean 4 but we might want to
postpone adding them till after the port. -/
@[mk_iff] class SeparableSpace : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable dense set. -/
exists_countable_dense : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s
theorem exists_countable_dense [SeparableSpace α] : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
SeparableSpace.exists_countable_dense
/-- A nonempty separable space admits a sequence with dense range. Instead of running `cases` on the
conclusion of this lemma, you might want to use `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq` and
`TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq`.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
theorem exists_dense_seq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, DenseRange u := by
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range.mp hs
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩
/-- A dense sequence in a non-empty separable topological space.
If `α` might be empty, then `TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense` is the main way to use
separability of `α`. -/
def denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ℕ → α :=
Classical.choose (exists_dense_seq α)
/-- The sequence `TopologicalSpace.denseSeq α` has dense range. -/
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : DenseRange (denseSeq α) :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
variable {α}
instance (priority := 100) Countable.to_separableSpace [Countable α] : SeparableSpace α where
exists_countable_dense := ⟨Set.univ, Set.countable_univ, dense_univ⟩
/-- If `f` has a dense range and its domain is countable, then its codomain is a separable space.
See also `DenseRange.separableSpace`. -/
theorem SeparableSpace.of_denseRange {ι : Sort _} [Countable ι] (u : ι → α) (hu : DenseRange u) :
SeparableSpace α :=
⟨⟨range u, countable_range u, hu⟩⟩
alias _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace' := SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
/-- If `α` is a separable space and `f : α → β` is a continuous map with dense range, then `β` is
a separable space as well. E.g., the completion of a separable uniform space is separable. -/
protected theorem _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (h : DenseRange f) (h' : Continuous f) : SeparableSpace β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
⟨⟨f '' s, Countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
theorem _root_.Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (hf : IsQuotientMap f) : SeparableSpace β :=
hf.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace hf.continuous
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias _root_.QuotientMap.separableSpace := Topology.IsQuotientMap.separableSpace
/-- The product of two separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] [SeparableSpace β] : SeparableSpace (α × β) := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩
rcases exists_countable_dense β with ⟨t, htc, htd⟩
exact ⟨⟨s ×ˢ t, hsc.prod htc, hsd.prod htd⟩⟩
/-- The product of a countable family of separable spaces is a separable space. -/
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SeparableSpace (X i)]
[Countable ι] : SeparableSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
choose t htc htd using (exists_countable_dense <| X ·)
haveI := fun i ↦ (htc i).to_subtype
nontriviality ∀ i, X i; inhabit ∀ i, X i
classical
set f : (Σ I : Finset ι, ∀ i : I, t i) → ∀ i, X i := fun ⟨I, g⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then g ⟨i, hi⟩ else (default : ∀ i, X i) i
refine ⟨⟨range f, countable_range f, dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 hU g hg with ⟨I, u, huo, huU⟩
have : ∀ i : I, ∃ y ∈ t i, y ∈ u i := fun i ↦
(htd i).exists_mem_open (huo i i.2).1 ⟨_, (huo i i.2).2⟩
choose y hyt hyu using this
lift y to ∀ i : I, t i using hyt
refine ⟨f ⟨I, y⟩, huU fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_, mem_range_self (f := f) ⟨I, y⟩⟩
simp only [f, dif_pos hi]
exact hyu ⟨i, _⟩
instance [SeparableSpace α] {r : α → α → Prop} : SeparableSpace (Quot r) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
instance [SeparableSpace α] {s : Setoid α} : SeparableSpace (Quotient s) :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
/-- A topological space with discrete topology is separable iff it is countable. -/
theorem separableSpace_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology α] : SeparableSpace α ↔ Countable α := by
simp [separableSpace_iff, countable_univ_iff]
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Pairwise.countable_of_isOpen_disjoint [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty) : Countable ι := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨u, u_countable, u_dense⟩
choose f hfu hfs using fun i ↦ u_dense.exists_mem_open (ho i) (hne i)
have f_inj : Injective f := fun i j hij ↦
hd.eq <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨f i, hfs i, hij.symm ▸ hfs j⟩
have := u_countable.to_subtype
exact (f_inj.codRestrict hfu).countable
/-- In a separable space, a family of nonempty disjoint open sets is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s) (ho : ∀ i ∈ a, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i ∈ a, (s i).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.subtype _ _).countable_of_isOpen_disjoint (Subtype.forall.2 ho) (Subtype.forall.2 hne)
/-- In a separable space, a family of disjoint sets with nonempty interiors is countable. -/
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s)
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, (interior (s i)).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.mono fun _ => interior_subset).countable_of_isOpen (fun _ _ => isOpen_interior) ha
/-- A set `s` in a topological space is separable if it is contained in the closure of a countable
set `c`. Beware that this definition does not require that `c` is contained in `s` (to express the
latter, use `TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace s` or
`TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (univ : Set s))`. In metric spaces, the two definitions are
equivalent, see `TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.separableSpace`. -/
def IsSeparable (s : Set α) :=
∃ c : Set α, c.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure c
theorem IsSeparable.mono {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : u ⊆ s) : IsSeparable u := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hs⟩
exact ⟨c, c_count, hu.trans hs⟩
theorem IsSeparable.iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) : IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) := by
choose c hc h'c using hs
refine ⟨⋃ i, c i, countable_iUnion hc, iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun i => ?_⟩
exact (h'c i).trans (closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ i))
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i) :=
⟨fun h i ↦ h.mono <| subset_iUnion s i, .iUnion⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_union {s t : Set α} : IsSeparable (s ∪ t) ↔ IsSeparable s ∧ IsSeparable t := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem IsSeparable.union {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : IsSeparable u) :
IsSeparable (s ∪ u) :=
isSeparable_union.2 ⟨hs, hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSeparable_closure : IsSeparable (closure s) ↔ IsSeparable s := by
simp only [IsSeparable, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
protected alias ⟨_, IsSeparable.closure⟩ := isSeparable_closure
theorem _root_.Set.Countable.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : IsSeparable s :=
⟨s, hs, subset_closure⟩
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.isSeparable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : IsSeparable s :=
hs.countable.isSeparable
theorem IsSeparable.univ_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {X : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (X i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable (univ.pi s) := by
classical
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (univ.pi s) with he | ⟨f₀, -⟩
· rw [he]
exact countable_empty.isSeparable
· choose c c_count hc using h
haveI := fun i ↦ (c_count i).to_subtype
set g : (I : Finset ι) × ((i : I) → c i) → (i : ι) → X i := fun ⟨I, f⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else f₀ i
refine ⟨range g, countable_range g, fun f hf ↦ mem_closure_iff.2 fun o ho hfo ↦ ?_⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 ho f hfo with ⟨I, u, huo, hI⟩
rsuffices ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : (i : I) → c i, g ⟨I, f⟩ ∈ Set.pi I u
· exact ⟨g ⟨I, f⟩, hI hf, mem_range_self (f := g) ⟨I, f⟩⟩
suffices H : ∀ i ∈ I, (u i ∩ c i).Nonempty by
choose f hfu hfc using H
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ⟨f i i.2, hfc i i.2⟩, fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [g, dif_pos hi] using hfu i hi
intro i hi
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (hc i <| hf _ trivial) _ (huo i hi).1 (huo i hi).2
lemma isSeparable_pi {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (h : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) :
IsSeparable {f : ∀ i, α i | ∀ i, f i ∈ s i} := by
simpa only [← mem_univ_pi] using IsSeparable.univ_pi h
lemma IsSeparable.prod {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsSeparable s) (ht : IsSeparable t) :
IsSeparable (s ×ˢ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨cs, cs_count, hcs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨ct, ct_count, hct⟩
refine ⟨cs ×ˢ ct, cs_count.prod ct_count, ?_⟩
rw [closure_prod_eq]
gcongr
theorem IsSeparable.image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s)
{f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : IsSeparable (f '' s) := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hc⟩
refine ⟨f '' c, c_count.image _, ?_⟩
rw [image_subset_iff]
exact hc.trans (closure_subset_preimage_closure_image hf)
theorem _root_.Dense.isSeparable_iff (hs : Dense s) :
IsSeparable s ↔ SeparableSpace α := by
simp_rw [IsSeparable, separableSpace_iff, dense_iff_closure_eq, ← univ_subset_iff,
← hs.closure_eq, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
theorem isSeparable_univ_iff : IsSeparable (univ : Set α) ↔ SeparableSpace α :=
dense_univ.isSeparable_iff
theorem isSeparable_range [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsSeparable (range f) :=
image_univ (f := f) ▸ (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 ‹_›).image hf
theorem IsSeparable.of_subtype (s : Set α) [SeparableSpace s] : IsSeparable s := by
simpa using isSeparable_range (continuous_subtype_val (p := (· ∈ s)))
theorem IsSeparable.of_separableSpace [h : SeparableSpace α] (s : Set α) : IsSeparable s :=
IsSeparable.mono (isSeparable_univ_iff.2 h) (subset_univ _)
end TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.iInf {β : Type*} {ι : Type*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace β}
{T : ι → Set (Set β)} (h_basis : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (t := t i) (T i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := ⨅ i, t i)
{ S | ∃ (U : ι → Set β) (F : Finset ι), (∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = ⋂ i ∈ F, U i } := by
let _ := ⨅ i, t i
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds ?_ ?_
· rintro - ⟨U, F, hU, rfl⟩
refine isOpen_biInter_finset fun i hi ↦
(h_basis i).isOpen (t := t i) (hU i hi) |>.mono (iInf_le _ _)
· intro a u ha hu
rcases (nhds_iInf (t := t) (a := a)).symm ▸ hasBasis_iInf'
(fun i ↦ (h_basis i).nhds_hasBasis (t := t i)) |>.mem_iff.1 (hu.mem_nhds ha)
with ⟨⟨F, U⟩, ⟨hF, hU⟩, hUu⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨U, hF.toFinset, ?_, rfl⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_iInter]
· exact fun i hi ↦ (hU i hi).1
· exact fun i hi ↦ (hU i hi).2
· exact hUu
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.iInf_induced {β : Type*} {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*}
[t : Π i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] {T : Π i, Set (Set (X i))}
(cond : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (T i)) (f : Π i, β → X i) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := ⨅ i, induced (f i) (t i))
{ S | ∃ (U : ∀ i, Set (X i)) (F : Finset ι),
(∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = ⋂ (i) (_ : i ∈ F), f i ⁻¹' U i } := by
convert IsTopologicalBasis.iInf (fun i ↦ (cond i).induced (f i)) with S
constructor <;> rintro ⟨U, F, hUT, hSU⟩
· exact ⟨fun i ↦ (f i) ⁻¹' (U i), F, fun i hi ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hUT i hi), hSU⟩
· choose! U' hU' hUU' using hUT
exact ⟨U', F, hU', hSU ▸ (.symm <| iInter₂_congr hUU')⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_pi {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
{T : ∀ i, Set (Set (X i))} (cond : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (T i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis { S | ∃ (U : ∀ i, Set (X i)) (F : Finset ι),
(∀ i, i ∈ F → U i ∈ T i) ∧ S = (F : Set ι).pi U } := by
simpa only [Set.pi_def] using IsTopologicalBasis.iInf_induced cond eval
theorem isTopologicalBasis_singletons (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] :
IsTopologicalBasis { s | ∃ x : α, (s : Set α) = {x} } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun _ _ => isOpen_discrete _) fun x _ hx _ =>
⟨{x}, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_singleton x, singleton_subset_iff.2 hx⟩
theorem isTopologicalBasis_subtype
{α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)}
(h : TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis B) (p : α → Prop) :
IsTopologicalBasis (Set.preimage (Subtype.val (p := p)) '' B) :=
h.isInducing ⟨rfl⟩
section
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
lemma isOpenMap_eval (i : ι) : IsOpenMap (Function.eval i : (∀ i, π i) → π i) := by
classical
refine (isTopologicalBasis_pi fun _ ↦ isTopologicalBasis_opens).isOpenMap_iff.2 ?_
rintro _ ⟨U, s, hU, rfl⟩
obtain h | h := ((s : Set ι).pi U).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [h]
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· rw [eval_image_pi (mod_cast hi) h]
exact hU _ hi
· rw [eval_image_pi_of_not_mem (mod_cast hi), if_pos h]
exact isOpen_univ
end
theorem Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
[SeparableSpace s] (hs : Dense s) : ∃ t ⊆ s, t.Countable ∧ Dense t :=
let ⟨t, htc, htd⟩ := exists_countable_dense s
⟨(↑) '' t, Subtype.coe_image_subset s t, htc.image Subtype.val,
hs.denseRange_val.dense_image continuous_subtype_val htd⟩
/-- Let `s` be a dense set in a topological space `α` with partial order structure. If `s` is a
separable space (e.g., if `α` has a second countable topology), then there exists a countable
dense subset `t ⊆ s` such that `t` contains bottom/top element of `α` when they exist and belong
to `s`. For a dense subset containing neither bot nor top elements, see
`Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset_no_bot_top`. -/
theorem Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
[PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} [SeparableSpace s] (hs : Dense s) :
∃ t ⊆ s, t.Countable ∧ Dense t ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s → x ∈ t) ∧
∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, htd⟩
refine ⟨(t ∪ ({ x | IsBot x } ∪ { x | IsTop x })) ∩ s, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
exacts [inter_subset_right,
(htc.union ((countable_isBot α).union (countable_isTop α))).mono inter_subset_left,
htd.mono (subset_inter subset_union_left hts), fun x hx hxs => ⟨Or.inr <| Or.inl hx, hxs⟩,
fun x hx hxs => ⟨Or.inr <| Or.inr hx, hxs⟩]
instance separableSpace_univ {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [SeparableSpace α] :
SeparableSpace (univ : Set α) :=
(Equiv.Set.univ α).symm.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace (continuous_id.subtype_mk _)
/-- If `α` is a separable topological space with a partial order, then there exists a countable
dense set `s : Set α` that contains those of both bottom and top elements of `α` that actually
exist. For a dense set containing neither bot nor top elements, see
`exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top`. -/
theorem exists_countable_dense_bot_top (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SeparableSpace α]
[PartialOrder α] :
∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s := by
simpa using dense_univ.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable (α : Type u) [t : TopologicalSpace α]
/-- A first-countable space is one in which every point has a
countable neighborhood basis. -/
class _root_.FirstCountableTopology : Prop where
/-- The filter `𝓝 a` is countably generated for all points `a`. -/
nhds_generated_countable : ∀ a : α, (𝓝 a).IsCountablyGenerated
attribute [instance] FirstCountableTopology.nhds_generated_countable
/-- If `β` is a first-countable space, then its induced topology via `f` on `α` is also
first-countable. -/
theorem firstCountableTopology_induced (α β : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace β]
[FirstCountableTopology β] (f : α → β) : @FirstCountableTopology α (t.induced f) :=
let _ := t.induced f
⟨fun x ↦ nhds_induced f x ▸ inferInstance⟩
variable {α}
instance Subtype.firstCountableTopology (s : Set α) [FirstCountableTopology α] :
FirstCountableTopology s :=
firstCountableTopology_induced s α (↑)
protected theorem _root_.Topology.IsInducing.firstCountableTopology {β : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsInducing f) :
FirstCountableTopology α := by
rw [hf.1]
exact firstCountableTopology_induced α β f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias _root_.Inducing.firstCountableTopology := IsInducing.firstCountableTopology
protected theorem _root_.Topology.IsEmbedding.firstCountableTopology {β : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsEmbedding f) :
FirstCountableTopology α :=
hf.1.firstCountableTopology
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias _root_.Embedding.firstCountableTopology := IsEmbedding.firstCountableTopology
namespace FirstCountableTopology
/-- In a first-countable space, a cluster point `x` of a sequence
is the limit of some subsequence. -/
theorem tendsto_subseq [FirstCountableTopology α] {u : ℕ → α} {x : α}
(hx : MapClusterPt x atTop u) : ∃ ψ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ψ ∧ Tendsto (u ∘ ψ) atTop (𝓝 x) :=
subseq_tendsto_of_neBot hx
end FirstCountableTopology
instance {β} [TopologicalSpace β] [FirstCountableTopology α] [FirstCountableTopology β] :
FirstCountableTopology (α × β) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [nhds_prod_eq]; infer_instance⟩
section Pi
instance {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Countable ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
[∀ i, FirstCountableTopology (π i)] : FirstCountableTopology (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun f => by rw [nhds_pi]; infer_instance⟩
end Pi
instance isCountablyGenerated_nhdsWithin (x : α) [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 x)] (s : Set α) :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝[s] x) :=
Inf.isCountablyGenerated _ _
variable (α) in
/-- A second-countable space is one with a countable basis. -/
class _root_.SecondCountableTopology : Prop where
/-- There exists a countable set of sets that generates the topology. -/
is_open_generated_countable : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ t = TopologicalSpace.generateFrom b
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.secondCountableTopology {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hc : b.Countable) : SecondCountableTopology α :=
⟨⟨b, hc, hb.eq_generateFrom⟩⟩
lemma SecondCountableTopology.mk' {α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hc : b.Countable) :
@SecondCountableTopology α (generateFrom b) :=
@SecondCountableTopology.mk α (generateFrom b) ⟨b, hc, rfl⟩
instance _root_.Finite.toSecondCountableTopology [Finite α] : SecondCountableTopology α where
is_open_generated_countable :=
⟨_, {U | IsOpen U}.to_countable, TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_opens.eq_generateFrom⟩
variable (α)
theorem exists_countable_basis [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ ∅ ∉ b ∧ IsTopologicalBasis b := by
obtain ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := @SecondCountableTopology.is_open_generated_countable α _ _
refine ⟨_, ?_, not_mem_diff_of_mem ?_, (isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis hb₂).diff_empty⟩
exacts [((countable_setOf_finite_subset hb₁).image _).mono diff_subset, rfl]
/-- A countable topological basis of `α`. -/
def countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] : Set (Set α) :=
(exists_countable_basis α).choose
theorem countable_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] : (countableBasis α).Countable :=
(exists_countable_basis α).choose_spec.1
instance encodableCountableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] : Encodable (countableBasis α) :=
(countable_countableBasis α).toEncodable
theorem empty_nmem_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] : ∅ ∉ countableBasis α :=
(exists_countable_basis α).choose_spec.2.1
theorem isBasis_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] :
IsTopologicalBasis (countableBasis α) :=
(exists_countable_basis α).choose_spec.2.2
theorem eq_generateFrom_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] :
‹TopologicalSpace α› = generateFrom (countableBasis α) :=
(isBasis_countableBasis α).eq_generateFrom
variable {α}
theorem isOpen_of_mem_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ countableBasis α) : IsOpen s :=
(isBasis_countableBasis α).isOpen hs
theorem nonempty_of_mem_countableBasis [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ countableBasis α) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs <| empty_nmem_countableBasis α
variable (α)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SecondCountableTopology.to_firstCountableTopology
[SecondCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology α :=
⟨fun _ => HasCountableBasis.isCountablyGenerated <|
⟨(isBasis_countableBasis α).nhds_hasBasis,
(countable_countableBasis α).mono inter_subset_left⟩⟩
/-- If `β` is a second-countable space, then its induced topology via
`f` on `α` is also second-countable. -/
theorem secondCountableTopology_induced (α β) [t : TopologicalSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β]
(f : α → β) : @SecondCountableTopology α (t.induced f) := by
rcases @SecondCountableTopology.is_open_generated_countable β _ _ with ⟨b, hb, eq⟩
letI := t.induced f
refine { is_open_generated_countable := ⟨preimage f '' b, hb.image _, ?_⟩ }
rw [eq, induced_generateFrom_eq]
variable {α}
instance Subtype.secondCountableTopology (s : Set α) [SecondCountableTopology α] :
SecondCountableTopology s :=
secondCountableTopology_induced s α (↑)
lemma secondCountableTopology_iInf {α ι} [Countable ι] {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α}
(ht : ∀ i, @SecondCountableTopology α (t i)) : @SecondCountableTopology α (⨅ i, t i) := by
rw [funext fun i => @eq_generateFrom_countableBasis α (t i) (ht i), ← generateFrom_iUnion]
exact SecondCountableTopology.mk' <|
countable_iUnion fun i => @countable_countableBasis _ (t i) (ht i)
-- TODO: more fine grained instances for `FirstCountableTopology`, `SeparableSpace`, `T2Space`, ...
instance {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology β] :
SecondCountableTopology (α × β) :=
((isBasis_countableBasis α).prod (isBasis_countableBasis β)).secondCountableTopology <|
(countable_countableBasis α).image2 (countable_countableBasis β) _
instance {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [Countable ι] [∀ a, TopologicalSpace (π a)]
[∀ a, SecondCountableTopology (π a)] : SecondCountableTopology (∀ a, π a) :=
secondCountableTopology_iInf fun _ => secondCountableTopology_induced _ _ _
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SecondCountableTopology.to_separableSpace [SecondCountableTopology α] :
SeparableSpace α := by
choose p hp using fun s : countableBasis α => nonempty_of_mem_countableBasis s.2
exact ⟨⟨range p, countable_range _, (isBasis_countableBasis α).dense_iff.2 fun o ho _ =>
⟨p ⟨o, ho⟩, hp ⟨o, _⟩, mem_range_self _⟩⟩⟩
/-- A countable open cover induces a second-countable topology if all open covers
are themselves second countable. -/
theorem secondCountableTopology_of_countable_cover {ι} [Countable ι] {U : ι → Set α}
[∀ i, SecondCountableTopology (U i)] (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α :=
haveI : IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' countableBasis (U i)) :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_cover Uo hc fun i => isBasis_countableBasis (U i)
this.secondCountableTopology (countable_iUnion fun _ => (countable_countableBasis _).image _)
/-- In a second-countable space, an open set, given as a union of open sets,
is equal to the union of countably many of those sets.
In particular, any open covering of `α` has a countable subcover: α is a Lindelöf space. -/
theorem isOpen_iUnion_countable [SecondCountableTopology α] {ι} (s : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) : ∃ T : Set ι, T.Countable ∧ ⋃ i ∈ T, s i = ⋃ i, s i := by
let B := { b ∈ countableBasis α | ∃ i, b ⊆ s i }
choose f hf using fun b : B => b.2.2
haveI : Countable B := ((countable_countableBasis α).mono (sep_subset _ _)).to_subtype
refine ⟨_, countable_range f, (iUnion₂_subset_iUnion _ _).antisymm (sUnion_subset ?_)⟩
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ x xs
rcases (isBasis_countableBasis α).exists_subset_of_mem_open xs (H _) with ⟨b, hb, xb, bs⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, ⟨⟨⟨_, hb, _, bs⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf _ xb⟩
theorem isOpen_biUnion_countable [SecondCountableTopology α] {ι : Type*} (I : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ I, IsOpen (s i)) : ∃ T ⊆ I, T.Countable ∧ ⋃ i ∈ T, s i = ⋃ i ∈ I, s i := by
simp_rw [← Subtype.exists_set_subtype, biUnion_image]
rcases isOpen_iUnion_countable (fun i : I ↦ s i) fun i ↦ H i i.2 with ⟨T, hTc, hU⟩
exact ⟨T, hTc.image _, hU.trans <| iUnion_subtype ..⟩
theorem isOpen_sUnion_countable [SecondCountableTopology α] (S : Set (Set α))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) : ∃ T : Set (Set α), T.Countable ∧ T ⊆ S ∧ ⋃₀ T = ⋃₀ S := by
simpa only [and_left_comm, sUnion_eq_biUnion] using isOpen_biUnion_countable S id H
/-- In a topological space with second countable topology, if `f` is a function that sends each
point `x` to a neighborhood of `x`, then for some countable set `s`, the neighborhoods `f x`,
`x ∈ s`, cover the whole space. -/
theorem countable_cover_nhds [SecondCountableTopology α] {f : α → Set α} (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ s, f x = univ := by
rcases isOpen_iUnion_countable (fun x => interior (f x)) fun x => isOpen_interior with
⟨s, hsc, hsU⟩
suffices ⋃ x ∈ s, interior (f x) = univ from
⟨s, hsc, flip eq_univ_of_subset this <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => interior_subset⟩
simp only [hsU, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
exact fun x => ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hf x)⟩
theorem countable_cover_nhdsWithin [SecondCountableTopology α] {f : α → Set α} {s : Set α}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t ⊆ s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, f x := by
have : ∀ x : s, (↑) ⁻¹' f x ∈ 𝓝 x := fun x => preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype.2 (hf x x.2)
rcases countable_cover_nhds this with ⟨t, htc, htU⟩
refine ⟨(↑) '' t, Subtype.coe_image_subset _ _, htc.image _, fun x hx => ?_⟩
simp only [biUnion_image, eq_univ_iff_forall, ← preimage_iUnion, mem_preimage] at htU ⊢
exact htU ⟨x, hx⟩
section Sigma
variable {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (E i)]
/-- In a disjoint union space `Σ i, E i`, one can form a topological basis by taking the union of
topological bases on each of the parts of the space. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.sigma {s : ∀ i : ι, Set (Set (E i))}
(hs : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (s i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, (fun u => (Sigma.mk i '' u : Set (Σi, E i))) '' s i) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ ?_
rw [Sigma.nhds_eq]
convert (((hs a.1).nhds_hasBasis).map _).to_image_id
aesop
/-- A countable disjoint union of second countable spaces is second countable. -/
instance [Countable ι] [∀ i, SecondCountableTopology (E i)] :
SecondCountableTopology (Σi, E i) := by
let b := ⋃ i : ι, (fun u => (Sigma.mk i '' u : Set (Σi, E i))) '' countableBasis (E i)
have A : IsTopologicalBasis b := IsTopologicalBasis.sigma fun i => isBasis_countableBasis _
have B : b.Countable := countable_iUnion fun i => (countable_countableBasis _).image _
exact A.secondCountableTopology B
end Sigma
section Sum
variable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- In a sum space `α ⊕ β`, one can form a topological basis by taking the union of
topological bases on each of the two components. -/
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.sum {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsTopologicalBasis s) {t : Set (Set β)}
(ht : IsTopologicalBasis t) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun u => Sum.inl '' u) '' s ∪ (fun u => Sum.inr '' u) '' t) := by
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u (⟨w, hw, rfl⟩ | ⟨w, hw, rfl⟩)
· exact IsOpenEmbedding.inl.isOpenMap w (hs.isOpen hw)
· exact IsOpenEmbedding.inr.isOpenMap w (ht.isOpen hw)
· rintro (x | x) u hxu u_open
· obtain ⟨v, vs, xv, vu⟩ : ∃ v ∈ s, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ Sum.inl ⁻¹' u :=
hs.exists_subset_of_mem_open hxu (isOpen_sum_iff.1 u_open).1
exact ⟨Sum.inl '' v, mem_union_left _ (mem_image_of_mem _ vs), mem_image_of_mem _ xv,
image_subset_iff.2 vu⟩
· obtain ⟨v, vs, xv, vu⟩ : ∃ v ∈ t, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ Sum.inr ⁻¹' u :=
ht.exists_subset_of_mem_open hxu (isOpen_sum_iff.1 u_open).2
exact ⟨Sum.inr '' v, mem_union_right _ (mem_image_of_mem _ vs), mem_image_of_mem _ xv,
image_subset_iff.2 vu⟩
/-- A sum type of two second countable spaces is second countable. -/
| instance [SecondCountableTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology β] :
SecondCountableTopology (α ⊕ β) := by
let b :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Bases.lean | 898 | 900 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Exponentially tilted measures
The exponential tilting of a measure `μ` on `α` by a function `f : α → ℝ` is the measure with
density `x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ y, exp (f y) ∂μ` with respect to `μ`. This is sometimes also called
the Esscher transform.
The definition is mostly used for `f` linear, in which case the exponentially tilted measure belongs
to the natural exponential family of the base measure. Exponentially tilted measures for general `f`
can be used for example to establish variational expressions for the Kullback-Leibler divergence.
## Main definitions
* `Measure.tilted μ f`: exponential tilting of `μ` by `f`, equal to
`μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Exponentially tilted measure. When `x ↦ exp (f x)` is integrable, `μ.tilted f` is the
probability measure with density with respect to `μ` proportional to `exp (f x)`. Otherwise it is 0.
-/
noncomputable
def Measure.tilted (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) : Measure α :=
μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_integrable (hf : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
rw [Measure.tilted, integral_undef hf]
simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_aemeasurable (hf : ¬ AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
refine tilted_of_not_integrable ?_
suffices ¬ AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ by exact fun h ↦ this h.1.aemeasurable
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h)
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ) : (0 : Measure α).tilted f = 0 := by simp [Measure.tilted]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_const' (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
simp only [Measure.tilted, withDensity_const, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h_univ : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp only [measureReal_def, h_univ, ENNReal.toReal_top, zero_mul, div_zero,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, zero_smul, ENNReal.inv_top]
congr
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ (exp_pos _).ne', mul_one,
measureReal_def, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
simp [h0.out]
lemma tilted_const (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = μ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero' (μ : Measure α) : μ.tilted 0 = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
change μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ 0) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ
simp
lemma tilted_zero (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ.tilted 0 = μ := by simp
lemma tilted_congr {g : α → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.tilted f = μ.tilted g := by
have h_int_eq : ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ = ∫ x, exp (g x) ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [hx]
refine withDensity_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [h_int_eq, hx]
lemma tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) :
μ.tilted f = μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)
(⟨exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ, by positivity⟩ : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [Measure.tilted]
congr with x
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal]
lemma tilted_apply' (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply _ hs]
lemma tilted_apply (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply' _ s]
lemma tilted_apply_eq_ofReal_integral' {s : Set α} (f : α → ℝ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a in s, exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· rw [tilted_apply' _ _ hs, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact hf.integrableOn.div_const _
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ by positivity)
· simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_integrable, Measure.coe_zero,
Pi.zero_apply, integral_undef hf, div_zero, integral_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
lemma tilted_apply_eq_ofReal_integral [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) :
μ.tilted f s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a in s, exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· rw [tilted_apply _ _, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact hf.integrableOn.div_const _
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ by positivity)
· simp [tilted_of_not_integrable hf, integral_undef hf]
lemma isProbabilityMeasure_tilted [NeZero μ] (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.tilted f) := by
constructor
simp_rw [tilted_apply' _ _ MeasurableSet.univ, setLIntegral_univ,
ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (integral_exp_pos hf), div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf.1.aemeasurable.ennreal_ofReal,
← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal hf (ae_of_all _ fun _ ↦ (exp_pos _).le),
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel]
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact integral_exp_pos hf
· simp
instance isZeroOrProbabilityMeasure_tilted : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure (μ.tilted f) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with hμ | hμ
· simp only [hμ, tilted_zero_measure]
infer_instance
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· have := isProbabilityMeasure_tilted hf
infer_instance
· simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_integrable]
infer_instance
section lintegral
lemma setLIntegral_tilted' (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * g x ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [Measure.tilted, setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀]
· simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
· refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
exact ((measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· exact hs
· filter_upwards
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top, implies_true]
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
lintegral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma setLIntegral_tilted [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * g x ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [Measure.tilted, setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀']
· simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
· refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
exact ((measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top, implies_true]
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
lintegral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma lintegral_tilted (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_univ, setLIntegral_tilted' f g MeasurableSet.univ, setLIntegral_univ]
end lintegral
section integral
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma setIntegral_tilted' (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x in s, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal, setIntegral_withDensity_eq_setIntegral_smul₀ _ _ hs]
· congr
· suffices AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) μ by
rw [← aemeasurable_coe_nnreal_real_iff]
refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
simpa only [NNReal.coe_mk]
exact (measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
integral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma setIntegral_tilted [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) (s : Set α) :
∫ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x in s, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal, setIntegral_withDensity_eq_setIntegral_smul₀']
· congr
· suffices AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) μ by
rw [← aemeasurable_coe_nnreal_real_iff]
refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
simpa only [NNReal.coe_mk]
exact (measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
integral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma integral_tilted (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) :
∫ x, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_tilted' f g MeasurableSet.univ, setIntegral_univ]
end integral
lemma integral_exp_tilted (f g : α → ℝ) :
∫ x, exp (g x) ∂(μ.tilted f) = (∫ x, exp ((f + g) x) ∂μ) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
rw [integral_tilted f]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
have : ∀ x, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * exp (g x)
= (exp ((f + g) x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) := by
intro x
rw [Pi.add_apply, exp_add]
ring
simp_rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [integral_mul_const]
lemma tilted_tilted (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) (g : α → ℝ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted g = μ.tilted (f + g) := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => simp [h]
| inr h0 =>
ext1 s hs
rw [tilted_apply' _ _ hs, tilted_apply' _ _ hs, setLIntegral_tilted' f _ hs]
congr with x
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (by positivity),
integral_exp_tilted f, Pi.add_apply, exp_add]
congr 1
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
field_simp
ring_nf
congr 1
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀, mul_one]
exact (integral_exp_pos hf).ne'
lemma tilted_comm (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) {g : α → ℝ}
(hg : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (g x)) μ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted g = (μ.tilted g).tilted f := by
rw [tilted_tilted hf, add_comm, tilted_tilted hg]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_neg_same' (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted (-f) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
rw [tilted_tilted hf]; simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_neg_same [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted (-f) = μ := by
simp [hf]
lemma tilted_absolutelyContinuous (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) : μ.tilted f ≪ μ :=
withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
lemma absolutelyContinuous_tilted (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) : μ ≪ μ.tilted f := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => simp only [h, tilted_zero_measure]; exact fun _ _ ↦ by simp
| inr h0 =>
refine withDensity_absolutelyContinuous' ?_ ?_
· exact (hf.1.aemeasurable.div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards
simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact fun _ ↦ div_pos (exp_pos _) (integral_exp_pos hf)
lemma integrable_tilted_iff {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) (g : α → E) :
Integrable g (μ.tilted f) ↔ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) • g x) μ := by
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
have hf_meas : AEMeasurable f μ := aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp hf.1.aemeasurable
rw [Measure.tilted, integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul₀' (by fun_prop) (by simp)]
calc Integrable (fun x ↦ (ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ a, exp (f a) ∂μ)).toReal • g x) μ
_ ↔ Integrable (fun x ↦ (exp (f x) / ∫ a, exp (f a) ∂μ) • g x) μ := by
congr! with a
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
positivity
_ ↔ Integrable (fun x ↦ (∫ a, exp (f a) ∂μ)⁻¹ • exp (f x) • g x) μ := by
congr! 2 with a
rw [smul_smul, div_eq_inv_mul]
_ ↔ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) • g x) μ := by
rw [integrable_fun_smul_iff]
simp only [ne_eq, inv_eq_zero]
have : NeZero μ := ⟨hμ⟩
exact (integral_exp_pos hf).ne'
lemma rnDeriv_tilted_right (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν]
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) ν) :
μ.rnDeriv (ν.tilted f)
=ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (- f x) * ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂ν) * μ.rnDeriv ν x := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero ν with
| inl h => simp_rw [h, ae_zero, Filter.EventuallyEq]; exact Filter.eventually_bot
| inr h0 =>
refine (Measure.rnDeriv_withDensity_right μ ν ?_ ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· exact (hf.1.aemeasurable.div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards
simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact fun _ ↦ div_pos (exp_pos _) (integral_exp_pos hf)
· refine ae_of_all _ (by simp)
· filter_upwards with x
congr
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_inv_of_pos, inv_div', ← exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
exact div_pos (exp_pos _) (integral_exp_pos hf)
lemma toReal_rnDeriv_tilted_right (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν]
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) ν) :
(fun x ↦ (μ.rnDeriv (ν.tilted f) x).toReal)
=ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ exp (- f x) * (∫ x, exp (f x) ∂ν) * (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [rnDeriv_tilted_right μ ν hf] with x hx
rw [hx]
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_mul, gt_iff_lt, mul_eq_mul_right_iff, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal_eq_iff]
exact Or.inl (by positivity)
|
variable (μ) in
lemma rnDeriv_tilted_left {ν : Measure α} [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hfν : AEMeasurable f ν) :
(μ.tilted f).rnDeriv ν
=ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / (∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ)) * μ.rnDeriv ν x := by
let g := fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / (∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))
refine Measure.rnDeriv_withDensity_left (μ := μ) (ν := ν) (f := g) ?_ ?_
· exact ((measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hfν).div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Tilted.lean | 340 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, Complex.norm_real, norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hx, log_neg_eq_log,
Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
@[bound]
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
@[bound]
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
@[bound]
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
lemma rpow_inv_log (hx₀ : 0 < x) (hx₁ : x ≠ 1) : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ = exp 1 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx₀, mul_inv_cancel₀]
exact log_ne_zero.2 ⟨hx₀.ne', hx₁, (hx₀.trans' <| by norm_num).ne'⟩
/-- See `Real.rpow_inv_log` for the equality when `x ≠ 1` is strictly positive. -/
lemma rpow_inv_log_le_exp_one : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ ≤ exp 1 := by
calc
_ ≤ |x ^ (log x)⁻¹| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |x| ^ (log x)⁻¹ := abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow ..
rw [← log_abs]
obtain hx | hx := (abs_nonneg x).eq_or_gt
· simp [hx]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]
gcongr
exact mul_inv_le_one
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.rpow_const {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : HasCompactSupport f) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : HasCompactSupport (fun x ↦ f x ^ r) :=
hf.comp_left (g := (· ^ r)) (Real.zero_rpow hr)
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, norm_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx),
ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(‖x‖ ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [norm_pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem norm_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, norm_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz)]
theorem norm_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact norm_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [norm_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, norm_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
theorem norm_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : ‖z ^ w‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (norm_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : ‖x ^ (y : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : ‖x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← norm_cpow_real]; simp
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : ‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ y.re := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hx.le]
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ re y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonneg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_ne_zero := norm_cpow_of_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_imp := norm_cpow_of_imp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_le := norm_cpow_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_real := norm_cpow_real
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_inv_nat := norm_cpow_inv_nat
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
open Filter in
lemma norm_ofReal_cpow_eventually_eq_atTop (c : ℂ) :
(fun t : ℝ ↦ ‖(t : ℂ) ^ c‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun t ↦ t ^ c.re := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ht]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_pow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_zpow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_intCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_add_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
lemma rpow_add_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_sub_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y (-n)
lemma rpow_sub_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_add_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
|
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 442 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 2,160 | 2,162 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Ordinal notation
Constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals below `ε₀`.
We define a type `ONote`, with constructors `0 : ONote` and `ONote.oadd e n a` representing
`ω ^ e * n + a`.
We say that `o` is in Cantor normal form - `ONote.NF o` - if either `o = 0` or
`o = ω ^ e * n + a` with `a < ω ^ e` and `a` in Cantor normal form.
The type `NONote` is the type of ordinals below `ε₀` in Cantor normal form.
Various operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, exponentiation)
are defined on `ONote` and `NONote`.
-/
open Ordinal Order
-- The generated theorem `ONote.zero.sizeOf_spec` is flagged by `simpNF`,
-- and we don't otherwise need it.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is
intended to refer to `ω ^ e * n + a`. For this to be a valid Cantor normal form, we must have the
exponents decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've defined `repr`, so we
make it a separate definition `NF`. -/
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
@[simp] theorem repr_zero : repr 0 = 0 := rfl
attribute [simp] repr.eq_1 repr.eq_2
/-- Print `ω^s*n`, omitting `s` if `e = 0` or `e = 1`, and omitting `n` if `n = 1` -/
private def toString_aux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toString_aux e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toString_aux e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
open Lean in
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
/-- Convert a `Nat` into an ordinal -/
@[coe] def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance (priority := low) nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200] theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
@[simp] theorem repr_one : repr 1 = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
theorem omega0_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos).2 (Nat.cast_le.2 n.2)
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos) (omega0_le_oadd e n a)
/-- Comparison of ordinal notations:
`ω ^ e₁ * n₁ + a₁` is less than `ω ^ e₂ * n₂ + a₂` when either `e₁ < e₂`, or `e₁ = e₂` and
`n₁ < n₂`, or `e₁ = e₂`, `n₁ = n₂`, and `a₁ < a₂`. -/
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).then <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).then (cmp a₁ a₂)
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq, not_lt, not_lt, ← le_antisymm_iff] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq h₂
simp
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr_zero, repr_one, Nat.cast_one, zero_lt_one]
/-- `NFBelow o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
`ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ⋯ + ω ^ aₖ * nₖ`
where `a₁ > a₂ > ⋯ > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating
the algorithms, we define everything over general ordinal notations and only prove correctness with
normal form as an invariant. -/
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₂
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₃
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction h with
| zero => exact opow_pos _ omega0_pos
| oadd' _ _ h₃ _ IH =>
rw [repr]
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 _)) _).trans
rw [← opow_succ]
exact opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃)
theorem NFBelow.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NFBelow o b₁) : NFBelow o b₂ := by
induction h with
| zero => exact zero
| oadd' h₁ h₂ h₃ _ _ => constructor; exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) :
NF (ONote.oadd e n a) → NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ => by (obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact NFBelow.oadd' h₁ h₂ H)
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NFBelow o b
| 0, _, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| ONote.oadd _ _ _, _, H, h =>
h.below_of_lt <|
(opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega0).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (omega0_le_oadd _ _ _) H
theorem nfBelow_ofNat : ∀ n, NFBelow (ofNat n) 1
| 0 => NFBelow.zero
| Nat.succ _ => NFBelow.oadd NF.zero NFBelow.zero zero_lt_one
instance nf_ofNat (n) : NF (ofNat n) :=
⟨⟨_, nfBelow_ofNat n⟩⟩
instance nf_one : NF 1 := by rw [← ofNat_one]; infer_instance
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ (repr (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) _ _
(NF.below_of_lt h h₁).repr_lt (omega0_le_oadd e₂ n₂ o₂)
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : ONote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+} (h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁ : ℕ) < n₂) :
oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ := by
simp only [lt_def, repr]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt) (le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _))
rwa [← mul_succ,Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega0_pos), succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_lt]
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) : oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ := by
rw [lt_def]; unfold repr
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ (repr a₁) _ h _
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : ONote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).Compares a b
| 0, 0, _, _ => rfl
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0, oadd _ _ _, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂), h₁, h₂ => by -- TODO: golf
rw [cmp]
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
simp only [Ordering.Compares, gt_iff_lt] at IHe; revert IHe
cases cmp e₁ e₂
case lt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe
case gt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe
case eq =>
intro IHe; dsimp at IHe; subst IHe
unfold _root_.cmp; cases nh : cmpUsing (· < ·) (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;>
rw [cmpUsing, ite_eq_iff, not_lt] at nh
case lt =>
rcases nh with nh | nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh.left
· rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; rcases nh.right with nh | nh <;> cases nh <;> contradiction
case gt =>
rcases nh with nh | nh
· cases nh; contradiction
· obtain ⟨_, nh⟩ := nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; rcases nh with nh | nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh.left
· cases nh; contradiction
rcases nh with nh | nh
· cases nh; contradiction
obtain ⟨nhl, nhr⟩ := nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nhr
rcases nhr with nhr | nhr
· cases nhr; contradiction
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (nhl.eq_of_not_lt nhr.1)
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd
revert IHa; cases cmp a₁ a₂ <;> intro IHa <;> dsimp at IHa
case lt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
case gt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
subst IHa; exact rfl
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun e => match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| Ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b) => (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| Ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b)=> (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| Ordering.eq, h => h,
congr_arg _⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega0_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a))
(d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 (fun h => by injection h : ONote.oadd e n a ≠ 0)
have L := le_of_not_lt fun l => not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)
simp only [repr] at d
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff <| (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega0 {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a := by
(rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega0_opow)
/-- `TopBelow b o` asserts that the largest exponent in `o`, if it exists, is less than `b`. This is
an auxiliary definition for decidability of `NF`. -/
def TopBelow (b : ONote) : ONote → Prop
| 0 => True
| oadd e _ _ => cmp e b = Ordering.lt
instance decidableTopBelow : DecidableRel TopBelow := by
intro b o
cases o <;> delta TopBelow <;> infer_instance
theorem nfBelow_iff_topBelow {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ TopBelow b o
| 0 => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
h₁.below_of_lt <| (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
instance decidableNF : DecidablePred NF
| 0 => isTrue NF.zero
| oadd e n a => by
have := decidableNF e
have := decidableNF a
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ TopBelow e a)
rw [← and_congr_right fun h => @nfBelow_iff_topBelow _ h _]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩
/-- Auxiliary definition for `add` -/
def addAux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ+) (o : ONote) : ONote :=
match o with
| 0 => oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') =>
match cmp e e' with
| Ordering.lt => o'
| Ordering.eq => oadd e (n + n') a'
| Ordering.gt => oadd e n o'
/-- Addition of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def add : ONote → ONote → ONote
| | 0, o => o
| oadd e n a, o => addAux e n (add a o)
instance : Add ONote :=
⟨add⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 373 | 379 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Kevin Buzzard, Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Algebra
/-!
# Internally graded rings and algebras
This module provides `DirectSum.GSemiring` and `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instances for a collection
of subobjects `A` when a `SetLike.GradedMonoid` instance is available:
* `SetLike.gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`
* `SetLike.gsemiring`
* `SetLike.gcommSemiring`
With these instances in place, it provides the bundled canonical maps out of a direct sum of
subobjects into their carrier type:
* `DirectSum.coeRingHom` (a `RingHom` version of `DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom`)
* `DirectSum.coeAlgHom` (an `AlgHom` version of `DirectSum.coeLinearMap`)
Strictly the definitions in this file are not sufficient to fully define an "internal" direct sum;
to represent this case, `(h : DirectSum.IsInternal A) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]` is
needed. In the future there will likely be a data-carrying, constructive, typeclass version of
`DirectSum.IsInternal` for providing an explicit decomposition function.
When `iSupIndep (Set.range A)` (a weaker condition than
`DirectSum.IsInternal A`), these provide a grading of `⨆ i, A i`, and the
mapping `⨁ i, A i →+ ⨆ i, A i` can be obtained as
`DirectSum.toAddMonoid (fun i ↦ AddSubmonoid.inclusion <| le_iSup A i)`.
This file also provides some extra structure on `A 0`, namely:
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subsemiring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommSemiring`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subring`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instCommRing`
* `SetLike.GradeZero.subalgebra`, which leads to
* `SetLike.GradeZero.instAlgebra`
## Tags
internally graded ring
-/
open DirectSum
variable {ι : Type*} {σ S R : Type*}
theorem SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded [Zero ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (s : S) : algebraMap S R s ∈ A 0 := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact (A 0).smul_mem s <| SetLike.one_mem_graded _
theorem SetLike.natCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddMonoidWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (n : ℕ) : (n : R) ∈ A 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [Nat.cast_zero]
exact zero_mem (A 0)
| succ _ n_ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
exact add_mem n_ih (SetLike.one_mem_graded _)
theorem SetLike.intCast_mem_graded [Zero ι] [AddGroupWithOne R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedOne A] (z : ℤ) : (z : R) ∈ A 0 := by
cases z
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast]
exact SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _
· rw [Int.cast_negSucc]
exact neg_mem (SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _)
section DirectSum
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-! #### From `AddSubmonoid`s and `AddSubgroup`s -/
namespace SetLike
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` instance for a collection of additive
submonoids. -/
instance gnonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [Add ι] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [SetLike σ R]
[AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedMul A] :
DirectSum.GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gMul A with
mul_zero := fun _ => Subtype.ext (mul_zero _)
zero_mul := fun _ => Subtype.ext (zero_mul _)
mul_add := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (mul_add _ _ _)
add_mul := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (add_mul _ _ _) }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GSemiring` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gsemiring [AddMonoid ι] [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gMonoid A with
mul_zero := fun _ => Subtype.ext (mul_zero _)
zero_mul := fun _ => Subtype.ext (zero_mul _)
mul_add := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (mul_add _ _ _)
add_mul := fun _ _ _ => Subtype.ext (add_mul _ _ _)
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, SetLike.natCast_mem_graded _ _⟩
natCast_zero := Subtype.ext Nat.cast_zero
natCast_succ := fun n => Subtype.ext (Nat.cast_succ n) }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GCommSemiring` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gcommSemiring [AddCommMonoid ι] [CommSemiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R]
(A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GCommSemiring fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gCommMonoid A, SetLike.gsemiring A with }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GRing` instance for a collection of additive subgroups. -/
instance gring [AddMonoid ι] [Ring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GRing fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gsemiring A with
intCast := fun z => ⟨z, SetLike.intCast_mem_graded _ _⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun _n => Subtype.ext <| Int.cast_natCast _
intCast_negSucc_ofNat := fun n => Subtype.ext <| Int.cast_negSucc n }
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GCommRing` instance for a collection of additive submonoids. -/
instance gcommRing [AddCommMonoid ι] [CommRing R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubgroupClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GCommRing fun i => A i :=
{ SetLike.gCommMonoid A, SetLike.gring A with }
end SetLike
namespace DirectSum
section coe
variable [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
/-- The canonical ring isomorphism between `⨁ i, A i` and `R` -/
def coeRingHom [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : (⨁ i, A i) →+* R :=
DirectSum.toSemiring (fun i => AddSubmonoidClass.subtype (A i)) rfl fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The canonical ring isomorphism between `⨁ i, A i` and `R` -/
@[simp]
theorem coeRingHom_of [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (i : ι) (x : A i) :
(coeRingHom A : _ →+* R) (of (fun i => A i) i x) = x :=
DirectSum.toSemiring_of _ _ _ _ _
theorem coe_mul_apply [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
[∀ (i : ι) (x : A i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) :
((r * r') n : R) =
∑ ij ∈ r.support ×ˢ r'.support with ij.1 + ij.2 = n, (r ij.1 * r' ij.2 : R) := by
rw [mul_eq_sum_support_ghas_mul, DFinsupp.finset_sum_apply, AddSubmonoidClass.coe_finset_sum]
simp_rw [coe_of_apply, apply_ite, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, ← Finset.sum_filter, SetLike.coe_gMul]
theorem coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
[∀ (i : ι) (x : A i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (r r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) :
((r * r') n : R) = r.sum fun i ri => r'.sum fun j rj => if i + j = n then (ri * rj : R)
else 0 := by
rw [mul_eq_dfinsuppSum]
iterate 2 rw [DFinsupp.sum_apply, DFinsupp.sum, AddSubmonoidClass.coe_finset_sum]; congr; ext
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· subst h
rw [of_eq_same]
rfl
· rw [of_eq_of_ne _ _ _ h]
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")]
alias coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsupp_sum := coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_aux [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] {i : ι} (r : A i)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) {j n : ι} (H : ∀ x : ι, i + x = n ↔ x = j) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = r * r' j := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
simp_rw [DFinsupp.sum, H, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with h
· rfl
rw [DFinsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_aux [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι}
(r' : A i) {j n : ι} (H : ∀ x : ι, x + i = n ↔ x = j) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = r j * r' := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum, DFinsupp.sum_comm]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
simp_rw [DFinsupp.sum, H, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with h
· rfl
rw [DFinsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_add [AddLeftCancelMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] {i : ι} (r : A i)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) (j : ι) : ((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') (i + j) : R) = r * r' j :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => ⟨fun h => add_left_cancel h, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_add [AddRightCancelMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i)
{i : ι} (r' : A i) (j : ι) : ((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') (j + i) : R) = r j * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => ⟨fun h => add_right_cancel h, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : A 0)
(r' : ⨁ i, A i) (j : ι) : ((of (fun i => A i) 0 r * r') j : R) = r * r' j :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => by rw [zero_add]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_mem_zero [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (r : ⨁ i, A i)
(r' : A 0) (j : ι) : ((r * of (fun i => A i) 0 r') j : R) = r j * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => by rw [add_zero]
end coe
section CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R] (A : ι → σ)
variable [AddCommMonoid ι] [PartialOrder ι] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd ι] [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, zero_mul, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
· rw [DFinsupp.sum, Finset.sum_ite_of_false, Finset.sum_const_zero]
exact fun x _ H => h ((self_le_add_right i x).trans_eq H)
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) (h : ¬i ≤ n) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coe_mul_apply_eq_dfinsuppSum, DFinsupp.sum_comm]
apply (DFinsupp.sum_single_index _).trans
swap
· simp_rw [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, mul_zero, ite_self]
exact DFinsupp.sum_zero
· rw [DFinsupp.sum, Finset.sum_ite_of_false, Finset.sum_const_zero]
exact fun x _ H => h ((self_le_add_left i x).trans_eq H)
variable [Sub ι] [OrderedSub ι] [AddLeftReflectLE ι]
/- The following two lemmas only require the same hypotheses as `eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le`, but we
state them for the above typeclasses for convenience. -/
theorem coe_mul_of_apply_of_le (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) (h : i ≤ n) :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = r (n - i) * r' :=
coe_mul_of_apply_aux _ _ _ fun _x => (eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le h).symm
theorem coe_of_mul_apply_of_le {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) (h : i ≤ n) :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = r * r' (n - i) :=
coe_of_mul_apply_aux _ _ _ fun x => by rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le h, add_comm]
theorem coe_mul_of_apply (r : ⨁ i, A i) {i : ι} (r' : A i) (n : ι) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] :
((r * of (fun i => A i) i r') n : R) = if i ≤ n then (r (n - i) : R) * r' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [coe_mul_of_apply_of_le _ _ _ n h, coe_mul_of_apply_of_not_le _ _ _ n h]
theorem coe_of_mul_apply {i : ι} (r : A i) (r' : ⨁ i, A i) (n : ι) [Decidable (i ≤ n)] :
((of (fun i => A i) i r * r') n : R) = if i ≤ n then (r * r' (n - i) : R) else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [coe_of_mul_apply_of_le _ _ _ n h, coe_of_mul_apply_of_not_le _ _ _ n h]
end CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
end DirectSum
/-! #### From `Submodule`s -/
namespace Submodule
/-- Build a `DirectSum.GAlgebra` instance for a collection of `Submodule`s. -/
instance galgebra [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R] (A : ι → Submodule S R)
[SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : DirectSum.GAlgebra S fun i => A i where
toFun :=
((Algebra.linearMap S R).codRestrict (A 0) <| SetLike.algebraMap_mem_graded A).toAddMonoidHom
map_one := Subtype.ext <| (algebraMap S R).map_one
map_mul _x _y := Sigma.subtype_ext (add_zero 0).symm <| (algebraMap S R).map_mul _ _
commutes := fun _r ⟨i, _xi⟩ =>
Sigma.subtype_ext ((zero_add i).trans (add_zero i).symm) <| Algebra.commutes _ _
smul_def := fun _r ⟨i, _xi⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext (zero_add i).symm <| Algebra.smul_def _ _
@[simp]
theorem setLike.coe_galgebra_toFun {ι} [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (s : S) :
(DirectSum.GAlgebra.toFun (A := fun i => A i) s) = (algebraMap S R s : R) :=
rfl
/-- A direct sum of powers of a submodule of an algebra has a multiplicative structure. -/
instance nat_power_gradedMonoid [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R] (p : Submodule S R) :
SetLike.GradedMonoid fun i : ℕ => p ^ i where
one_mem := by
rw [← one_le, pow_zero]
mul_mem i j p q hp hq := by
rw [pow_add]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul hp hq
end Submodule
/-- The canonical algebra isomorphism between `⨁ i, A i` and `R`. -/
def DirectSum.coeAlgHom [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] : (⨁ i, A i) →ₐ[S] R :=
DirectSum.toAlgebra S _ (fun i => (A i).subtype) rfl (fun _ _ => rfl)
/-- The supremum of submodules that form a graded monoid is a subalgebra, and equal to the range of
`DirectSum.coeAlgHom`. -/
theorem Submodule.iSup_eq_toSubmodule_range [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R]
[Algebra S R] (A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] :
⨆ i, A i = Subalgebra.toSubmodule (DirectSum.coeAlgHom A).range :=
(Submodule.iSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum A).trans <| SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of [AddMonoid ι] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring R] [Algebra S R]
(A : ι → Submodule S R) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A] (i : ι) (x : A i) :
DirectSum.coeAlgHom A (DirectSum.of (fun i => A i) i x) = x :=
DirectSum.toSemiring_of _ (by rfl) (fun _ _ => (by rfl)) _ _
end DirectSum
/-! ### Facts about grade zero -/
namespace SetLike.GradeZero
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R]
variable (A : ι → σ) [SetLike.GradedMonoid A]
/-- The subsemiring `A 0` of `R`. -/
def subsemiring : Subsemiring R where
carrier := A 0
__ := submonoid A
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem (A 0)
-- TODO: it might be expensive to unify `A` in this instance in practice
/-- The semiring `A 0` inherited from `R` in the presence of `SetLike.GradedMonoid A`. -/
instance instSemiring : Semiring (A 0) := (subsemiring A).toSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : A 0) = (n : R) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : A 0) = (ofNat(n) : R) := rfl
| end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddMonoid ι] [SetLike σ R] [AddSubmonoidClass σ R]
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Internal.lean | 346 | 349 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 146 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.MulOpposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subsemiring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
/-!
# Subsemiring of opposite semirings
For every semiring `R`, we construct an equivalence between subsemirings of `R` and that of `Rᵐᵒᵖ`.
-/
namespace Subsemiring
variable {ι : Sort*} {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R]
/-- Pull a subsemiring back to an opposite subsemiring along `MulOpposite.unop` -/
@[simps! coe toSubmonoid]
protected def op (S : Subsemiring R) : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ where
toSubmonoid := S.toSubmonoid.op
add_mem' {x} {y} hx hy := add_mem (show x.unop ∈ S from hx) (show y.unop ∈ S from hy)
zero_mem' := zero_mem S
attribute [norm_cast] coe_op
@[simp]
theorem mem_op {x : Rᵐᵒᵖ} {S : Subsemiring R} : x ∈ S.op ↔ x.unop ∈ S := Iff.rfl
/-- Pull an opposite subsemiring back to a subsemiring along `MulOpposite.op` -/
@[simps! coe toSubmonoid]
protected def unop (S : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ) : Subsemiring R where
toSubmonoid := S.toSubmonoid.unop
add_mem' {x} {y} hx hy := add_mem
(show MulOpposite.op x ∈ S from hx) (show MulOpposite.op y ∈ S from hy)
zero_mem' := zero_mem S
attribute [norm_cast] coe_unop
@[simp]
theorem mem_unop {x : R} {S : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : x ∈ S.unop ↔ MulOpposite.op x ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_op (S : Subsemiring R) : S.op.unop = S := rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_unop (S : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ) : S.unop.op = S := rfl
/-! ### Lattice results -/
theorem op_le_iff {S₁ : Subsemiring R} {S₂ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.op ≤ S₂ ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂.unop :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
theorem le_op_iff {S₁ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} {S₂ : Subsemiring R} : S₁ ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁.unop ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[simp]
theorem op_le_op_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring R} : S₁.op ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[simp]
theorem unop_le_unop_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.unop ≤ S₂.unop ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.unop_surjective.forall
/-- A subsemiring `S` of `R` determines a subsemiring `S.op` of the opposite ring `Rᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps]
def opEquiv : Subsemiring R ≃o Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun := Subsemiring.op
invFun := Subsemiring.unop
left_inv := unop_op
right_inv := op_unop
map_rel_iff' := op_le_op_iff
theorem op_injective : (@Subsemiring.op R _).Injective := opEquiv.injective
theorem unop_injective : (@Subsemiring.unop R _).Injective := opEquiv.symm.injective
@[simp] theorem op_inj {S T : Subsemiring R} : S.op = T.op ↔ S = T := opEquiv.eq_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem unop_inj {S T : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : S.unop = T.unop ↔ S = T := opEquiv.symm.eq_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_bot : (⊥ : Subsemiring R).op = ⊥ := opEquiv.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem op_eq_bot {S : Subsemiring R} : S.op = ⊥ ↔ S = ⊥ := op_injective.eq_iff' op_bot
@[simp]
theorem unop_bot : (⊥ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ).unop = ⊥ := opEquiv.symm.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem unop_eq_bot {S : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : S.unop = ⊥ ↔ S = ⊥ := unop_injective.eq_iff' unop_bot
@[simp]
theorem op_top : (⊤ : Subsemiring R).op = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_eq_top {S : Subsemiring R} : S.op = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ := op_injective.eq_iff' op_top
@[simp]
theorem unop_top : (⊤ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ).unop = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_eq_top {S : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ} : S.unop = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ := unop_injective.eq_iff' unop_top
theorem op_sup (S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring R) : (S₁ ⊔ S₂).op = S₁.op ⊔ S₂.op :=
opEquiv.map_sup _ _
theorem unop_sup (S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ) : (S₁ ⊔ S₂).unop = S₁.unop ⊔ S₂.unop :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sup _ _
theorem op_inf (S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring R) : (S₁ ⊓ S₂).op = S₁.op ⊓ S₂.op := rfl
theorem unop_inf (S₁ S₂ : Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ) : (S₁ ⊓ S₂).unop = S₁.unop ⊓ S₂.unop := rfl
theorem op_sSup (S : Set (Subsemiring R)) : (sSup S).op = sSup (.unop ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage _
theorem unop_sSup (S : Set (Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ)) : (sSup S).unop = sSup (.op ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage _
theorem op_sInf (S : Set (Subsemiring R)) : (sInf S).op = sInf (.unop ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage _
| theorem unop_sInf (S : Set (Subsemiring Rᵐᵒᵖ)) : (sInf S).unop = sInf (.op ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage _
theorem op_iSup (S : ι → Subsemiring R) : (iSup S).op = ⨆ i, (S i).op := opEquiv.map_iSup _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Subsemiring/MulOpposite.lean | 129 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
/-!
# Properties of cyclic permutations constructed from lists/cycles
In the following, `{α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]`.
## Main definitions
* `Cycle.formPerm`: the cyclic permutation created by looping over a `Cycle α`
* `Equiv.Perm.toList`: the list formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`: the cycle formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`: the equivalence between cyclic permutations `f : Perm α`
and the terms of `Cycle α` that correspond to them
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'`: the same equivalence as `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`
but with evaluation via choosing over fintypes
* The notation `c[1, 2, 3]` to emulate notation of cyclic permutations `(1 2 3)`
* A `Repr` instance for any `Perm α`, by representing the `Finset` of
`Cycle α` that correspond to the cycle factors.
## Main results
* `List.isCycle_formPerm`: a nontrivial list without duplicates, when interpreted as
a permutation, is cyclic
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle`: there is only one nontrivial `Cycle α`
corresponding to each cyclic `f : Perm α`
## Implementation details
The forward direction of `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'` uses `Fintype.choose` of the uniqueness
result, relying on the `Fintype` instance of a `Cycle.Nodup` subtype.
It is unclear if this works faster than the `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`, which relies
on recursion over `Finset.univ`.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ mem_cons_self]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem this
use k
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk]
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
theorem cycleType_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
cycleType l.attach.formPerm = {l.length} := by
rw [← length_attach] at hn
rw [← nodup_attach] at hl
rw [cycleType_eq [l.attach.formPerm]]
· simp only [map, Function.comp_apply]
rw [support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hl, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hl]
· simp
· intro x h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hn
· simp
· simpa using isCycle_formPerm hl hn
· simp
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (hl : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
formPerm l x = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [next_getElem _ hl, formPerm_apply_getElem _ hl]
end List
namespace Cycle
variable [DecidableEq α] (s : Cycle α)
/-- A cycle `s : Cycle α`, given `Nodup s` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α`
where each element in the list is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`.
-/
def formPerm : ∀ s : Cycle α, Nodup s → Equiv.Perm α :=
fun s => Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => List.formPerm l) fun l₁ l₂ (h : l₁ ~r l₂) => by
apply Function.hfunext
· ext
exact h.nodup_iff
· intro h₁ h₂ _
exact heq_of_eq (formPerm_eq_of_isRotated h₁ h)
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_coe (l : List α) (hl : l.Nodup) : formPerm (l : Cycle α) hl = l.formPerm :=
rfl
theorem formPerm_subsingleton (s : Cycle α) (h : Subsingleton s) : formPerm s h.nodup = 1 := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
simp only [formPerm_coe, mk_eq_coe]
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe] at h
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := s
· simp
· simp only [length_eq_zero_iff, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, List.length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h
simp [h]
theorem isCycle_formPerm (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
IsCycle (formPerm s h) := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.isCycle_formPerm h (length_nontrivial hn)
theorem support_formPerm [Fintype α] (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
support (formPerm s h) = s.toFinset := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup s h ?_
rintro _ rfl
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using length_nontrivial hn
theorem formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
formPerm s h x = x := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ hx
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
formPerm s h x = next s h x hx := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next h _ (by simp_all)
nonrec theorem formPerm_reverse (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) :
formPerm s.reverse (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr h) = (formPerm s h)⁻¹ := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using formPerm_reverse _
nonrec theorem formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s s' : Cycle α} {hs : s.Nodup}
{hs' : s'.Nodup} :
s.formPerm hs = s'.formPerm hs' ↔ s = s' ∨ s.Subsingleton ∧ s'.Subsingleton := by
rw [Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff, Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff]
revert s s'
intro s s'
apply @Quotient.inductionOn₂' _ _ _ _ _ s s'
intro l l' hl hl'
simpa using formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff hl hl'
end Cycle
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
/-- `Equiv.Perm.toList (f : Perm α) (x : α)` generates the list `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]`
until looping. That means when `f x = x`, `toList f x = []`.
-/
def toList : List α :=
List.iterate p x (cycleOf p x).support.card
@[simp]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil_iff {p : Perm α} {x} : toList p x = [] ↔ x ∉ p.support := by simp [toList]
@[simp]
theorem length_toList : length (toList p x) = (cycleOf p x).support.card := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_ne_singleton (y : α) : toList p x ≠ [y] := by
intro H
simpa [card_support_ne_one] using congr_arg length H
theorem two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support {p : Perm α} {x : α} :
2 ≤ length (toList p x) ↔ x ∈ p.support := by simp
theorem length_toList_pos_of_mem_support (h : x ∈ p.support) : 0 < length (toList p x) :=
zero_lt_two.trans_le (two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support.mpr h)
theorem getElem_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x)[n] = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated getElem_toList (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem get_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_getElem_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x)[0]'(length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h) = x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated toList_getElem_zero (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem toList_get_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).get ⟨0, (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h)⟩ = x := by simp [toList]
variable {p} {x}
theorem mem_toList_iff {y : α} : y ∈ toList p x ↔ SameCycle p x y ∧ x ∈ p.support := by
simp only [toList, mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hx, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx
rw [← support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨h, hx⟩
simpa using h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
theorem nodup_toList (p : Perm α) (x : α) : Nodup (toList p x) := by
by_cases hx : p x = x
· rw [← not_mem_support, ← toList_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
have hc : IsCycle (cycleOf p x) := isCycle_cycleOf p hx
rw [nodup_iff_injective_getElem]
intro ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
rw [length_toList, ← hc.orderOf] at hm hn
rw [← cycleOf_apply_self, ← Ne, ← mem_support] at hx
simp only [Fin.mk.injEq]
rw [getElem_toList, getElem_toList, ← cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x n, ←
cycleOf_pow_apply_self p x m]
rcases n with - | n <;> rcases m with - | m
· simp
· rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf m.zero_lt_succ hm, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
simp [hx.symm]
· rw [← hc.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf n.zero_lt_succ hn, mem_support,
cycleOf_pow_apply_self] at hx
simp [hx]
intro h
have hn' : ¬orderOf (p.cycleOf x) ∣ n.succ := Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt n.zero_lt_succ hn
have hm' : ¬orderOf (p.cycleOf x) ∣ m.succ := Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt m.zero_lt_succ hm
rw [← hc.support_pow_eq_iff] at hn' hm'
rw [← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn, ← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hm, ← pow_inj_mod]
refine support_congr ?_ ?_
· rw [hm', hn']
· rw [hm']
intro y hy
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hc.exists_pow_eq (mem_support.mp hx) (mem_support.mp hy)
rw [← mul_apply, (Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq, mul_apply, h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply,
(Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq]
theorem next_toList_eq_apply (p : Perm α) (x y : α) (hy : y ∈ toList p x) :
next (toList p x) y hy = p y := by
rw [mem_toList_iff] at hy
obtain ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := hy.left.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hy.right
rw [← getElem_toList p x k (by simpa using hk)] at hk'
simp_rw [← hk']
rw [next_getElem _ (nodup_toList _ _), getElem_toList, getElem_toList, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ']
simp_rw [length_toList]
rw [← pow_mod_orderOf_cycleOf_apply p (k + 1), IsCycle.orderOf]
exact isCycle_cycleOf _ (mem_support.mp hy.right)
theorem toList_pow_apply_eq_rotate (p : Perm α) (x : α) (k : ℕ) :
p.toList ((p ^ k) x) = (p.toList x).rotate k := by
apply ext_getElem
· simp only [length_toList, cycleOf_self_apply_pow, length_rotate]
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_toList, getElem_rotate, getElem_toList, length_toList,
pow_mod_card_support_cycleOf_self_apply, pow_add, mul_apply]
theorem SameCycle.toList_isRotated {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (h : SameCycle f x y) :
toList f x ~r toList f y := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ f.support
· obtain ⟨_ | k, _, hy⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
· simp only [coe_one, id, pow_zero] at hy
-- Porting note: added `IsRotated.refl`
simp [hy, IsRotated.refl]
use k.succ
rw [← toList_pow_apply_eq_rotate, hy]
· rw [toList_eq_nil_iff.mpr hx, isRotated_nil_iff', eq_comm, toList_eq_nil_iff]
rwa [← h.mem_support_iff]
theorem pow_apply_mem_toList_iff_mem_support {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n) x ∈ p.toList x ↔ x ∈ p.support := by
rw [mem_toList_iff, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
refine fun _ => SameCycle.symm ?_
rw [sameCycle_pow_left]
theorem toList_formPerm_nil (x : α) : toList (formPerm ([] : List α)) x = [] := by simp
theorem toList_formPerm_singleton (x y : α) : toList (formPerm [x]) y = [] := by simp
theorem toList_formPerm_nontrivial (l : List α) (hl : 2 ≤ l.length) (hn : Nodup l) :
toList (formPerm l) (l.get ⟨0, (zero_lt_two.trans_le hl)⟩) = l := by
have hc : l.formPerm.IsCycle := List.isCycle_formPerm hn hl
have hs : l.formPerm.support = l.toFinset := by
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hn ?_
rintro _ rfl
simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hl
rw [toList, hc.cycleOf_eq (mem_support.mp _), hs, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hn]
· refine ext_getElem (by simp) fun k hk hk' => ?_
simp only [get_eq_getElem, getElem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, formPerm_pow_apply_getElem _ hn,
zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk']
· simp [hs]
theorem toList_formPerm_isRotated_self (l : List α) (hl : 2 ≤ l.length) (hn : Nodup l) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ l) : toList (formPerm l) x ~r l := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem hx
have hr : l ~r l.rotate k := ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [formPerm_eq_of_isRotated hn hr]
rw [get_eq_get_rotate l k k]
simp only [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt k.2, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt k.2), Nat.mod_self]
rw [toList_formPerm_nontrivial]
· simp
· simpa using hl
· simpa using hn
theorem formPerm_toList (f : Perm α) (x : α) : formPerm (toList f x) = f.cycleOf x := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [(cycleOf_eq_one_iff f).mpr hx, toList_eq_nil_iff.mpr (not_mem_support.mpr hx),
formPerm_nil]
ext y
by_cases hy : SameCycle f x y
· obtain ⟨k, _, rfl⟩ := hy.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support (mem_support.mpr hx)
rw [cycleOf_apply_apply_pow_self, List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (nodup_toList f x),
next_toList_eq_apply, pow_succ', mul_apply]
rw [mem_toList_iff]
exact ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, mem_support.mpr hx⟩
· rw [cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle hy, formPerm_apply_of_not_mem]
simp [mem_toList_iff, hy]
/-- Given a cyclic `f : Perm α`, generate the `Cycle α` in the order
of application of `f`. Implemented by finding an element `x : α`
in the support of `f` in `Finset.univ`, and iterating on using
`Equiv.Perm.toList f x`.
-/
def toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : Cycle α :=
Multiset.recOn (Finset.univ : Finset α).val (Quot.mk _ [])
(fun x _ l => if f x = x then l else toList f x)
(by
intro x y _ s
refine heq_of_eq ?_
split_ifs with hx hy hy <;> try rfl
have hc : SameCycle f x y := IsCycle.sameCycle hf hx hy
exact Quotient.sound' hc.toList_isRotated)
theorem toCycle_eq_toList (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) (x : α) (hx : f x ≠ x) :
toCycle f hf = toList f x := by
have key : (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = x ::ₘ Finset.univ.val.erase x := by simp
| rw [toCycle, key]
simp [hx]
theorem nodup_toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : (toCycle f hf).Nodup := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
simpa [toCycle_eq_toList f hf x hx] using nodup_toList _ _
theorem nontrivial_toCycle (f : Perm α) (hf : IsCycle f) : (toCycle f hf).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, -⟩ := id hf
simp [toCycle_eq_toList f hf x hx, hx, Cycle.nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff (nodup_toList _ _)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 372 | 382 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.LinearOrder
/-!
# Booleans
This file proves various trivial lemmas about booleans and their
relation to decidable propositions.
## Tags
bool, boolean, Bool, De Morgan
-/
namespace Bool
section
/-!
This section contains lemmas about booleans which were present in core Lean 3.
The remainder of this file contains lemmas about booleans from mathlib 3.
-/
theorem true_eq_false_eq_False : ¬true = false := by decide
theorem false_eq_true_eq_False : ¬false = true := by decide
theorem eq_false_eq_not_eq_true (b : Bool) : (¬b = true) = (b = false) := by simp
theorem eq_true_eq_not_eq_false (b : Bool) : (¬b = false) = (b = true) := by simp
theorem eq_false_of_not_eq_true {b : Bool} : ¬b = true → b = false :=
Eq.mp (eq_false_eq_not_eq_true b)
theorem eq_true_of_not_eq_false {b : Bool} : ¬b = false → b = true :=
Eq.mp (eq_true_eq_not_eq_false b)
theorem and_eq_true_eq_eq_true_and_eq_true (a b : Bool) :
((a && b) = true) = (a = true ∧ b = true) := by simp
theorem or_eq_true_eq_eq_true_or_eq_true (a b : Bool) :
((a || b) = true) = (a = true ∨ b = true) := by simp
theorem not_eq_true_eq_eq_false (a : Bool) : (not a = true) = (a = false) := by cases a <;> simp
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-05
this is no longer a simp lemma, as the LHS simplifies. -/
theorem and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false (a b : Bool) :
((a && b) = false) = (a = false ∨ b = false) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem or_eq_false_eq_eq_false_and_eq_false (a b : Bool) :
((a || b) = false) = (a = false ∧ b = false) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem not_eq_false_eq_eq_true (a : Bool) : (not a = false) = (a = true) := by cases a <;> simp
theorem coe_false : ↑false = False := by simp
theorem coe_true : ↑true = True := by simp
theorem coe_sort_false : (false : Prop) = False := by simp
theorem coe_sort_true : (true : Prop) = True := by simp
theorem decide_iff (p : Prop) [d : Decidable p] : decide p = true ↔ p := by simp
theorem decide_true {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : p → decide p :=
(decide_iff p).2
theorem of_decide_true {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : decide p → p :=
(decide_iff p).1
theorem bool_iff_false {b : Bool} : ¬b ↔ b = false := by cases b <;> decide
theorem bool_eq_false {b : Bool} : ¬b → b = false :=
bool_iff_false.1
theorem decide_false_iff (p : Prop) {_ : Decidable p} : decide p = false ↔ ¬p :=
bool_iff_false.symm.trans (not_congr (decide_iff _))
theorem decide_false {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : ¬p → decide p = false :=
(decide_false_iff p).2
theorem of_decide_false {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : decide p = false → ¬p :=
(decide_false_iff p).1
theorem decide_congr {p q : Prop} [Decidable p] [Decidable q] (h : p ↔ q) : decide p = decide q :=
decide_eq_decide.mpr h
theorem coe_xor_iff (a b : Bool) : xor a b ↔ Xor' (a = true) (b = true) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> decide
end
theorem dichotomy (b : Bool) : b = false ∨ b = true := by cases b <;> simp
theorem not_ne_id : not ≠ id := fun h ↦ false_ne_true <| congrFun h true
theorem or_inl {a b : Bool} (H : a) : a || b := by simp [H]
theorem or_inr {a b : Bool} (H : b) : a || b := by cases a <;> simp [H]
theorem and_elim_left : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → a := by decide
theorem and_intro : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a → b → a && b := by decide
theorem and_elim_right : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → b := by decide
| Mathlib/Data/Bool/Basic.lean | 115 | 115 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,024 | 1,033 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 1,012 | 1,014 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
| lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 417 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.MulOppositeLemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
/-! # Pointwise instances on `Subgroup` and `AddSubgroup`s
This file provides the actions
* `Subgroup.pointwiseMulAction`
* `AddSubgroup.pointwiseMulAction`
which matches the action of `Set.mulActionSet`.
These actions are available in the `Pointwise` locale.
## Implementation notes
The pointwise section of this file is almost identical to
the file `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise`.
Where possible, try to keep them in sync.
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {α G A S : Type*}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem inv_coe_set [InvolutiveInv G] [SetLike S G] [InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : (H : Set G)⁻¹ = H :=
Set.ext fun _ => inv_mem_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_coe_set [Group G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] {s : S} {a : G} (ha : a ∈ s) :
a • (s : Set G) = s := by
ext; simp [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, mul_mem_cancel_left, ha]
@[norm_cast, to_additive]
lemma coe_set_eq_one [Group G] {s : Subgroup G} : (s : Set G) = 1 ↔ s = ⊥ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma op_smul_coe_set [Group G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] {s : S} {a : G} (ha : a ∈ s) :
MulOpposite.op a • (s : Set G) = s := by
ext; simp [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, mul_mem_cancel_right, ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
lemma coe_div_coe [SetLike S G] [DivisionMonoid G] [SubgroupClass S G] (H : S) :
H / H = (H : Set G) := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
variable [Group G] [AddGroup A] {s : Set G}
namespace Set
open Subgroup
| @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_subgroupClosure (hs : s.Nonempty) : s * closure s = closure s := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← Set.iUnion_smul_set]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Pointwise.lean | 66 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
theorem rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| a :: l, 0, m => by simp
| [], n, m => by simp
| a :: l, n + 1, m => by
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate' _ n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← rotate'_cons_succ,
Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length (l : List α) : rotate' l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate'_eq_drop_append_take le_rfl]; simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length_mul (l : List α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length := by
simp [-rotate'_length, Nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
_ = l := by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul l n]
theorem rotate'_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc
l.rotate' (n % l.length) =
(l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate' ((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) :=
by rw [rotate'_length_mul]
_ = l.rotate' n := by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp_all [length_eq_zero_iff]
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod,
rotate'_eq_drop_append_take (le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))]
simp [rotate]
@[simp] theorem rotate_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate (n + 1) = (l ++ [a]).rotate n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rotate : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [], _, n => by simp
| a :: l, _, 0 => by simp
| a :: l, _, n + 1 => by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or_comm]
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_replicate (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : (replicate n a).rotate k = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate_iff.2 ⟨by rw [length_rotate, length_replicate], fun b hb =>
eq_of_mem_replicate <| mem_rotate.1 hb⟩
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ l.length → l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']; exact rotate'_eq_drop_append_take
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l.drop (n % l.length) ++ l.take (n % l.length) := by
rcases l.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· simp [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm]
rw [← rotate_eq_drop_append_take (n.mod_lt hl).le, rotate_mod]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_append_length_eq (l l' : List α) : (l ++ l').rotate l.length = l' ++ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction l generalizing l'
· simp
· simp_all [rotate']
theorem rotate_rotate (l : List α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length (l : List α) : rotate l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length_mul (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
theorem rotate_perm (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate'_cons_succ]
exact (hn _).trans (perm_append_singleton _ _)
@[simp]
theorem nodup_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : Nodup (l.rotate n) ↔ Nodup l :=
(rotate_perm l n).nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [rotate_cons_succ, hn]
theorem nil_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : [] = l.rotate n ↔ [] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : [x].rotate n = [x] :=
rotate_replicate x 1 n
theorem zipWith_rotate_distrib {β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) (l' : List β) (n : ℕ)
(h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zipWith f l l').rotate n = zipWith f (l.rotate n) (l'.rotate n) := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod,
rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, h, zipWith_append, ← drop_zipWith, ←
take_zipWith, List.length_zipWith, h, min_self]
rw [length_drop, length_drop, h]
theorem zipWith_rotate_one {β : Type*} (f : α → α → β) (x y : α) (l : List α) :
zipWith f (x :: y :: l) ((x :: y :: l).rotate 1) = f x y :: zipWith f (y :: l) (l ++ [x]) := by
simp
theorem getElem?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n)[m]? = l[(m + n) % l.length]? := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod]
rcases lt_or_le m (l.drop (n % l.length)).length with hm | hm
· rw [getElem?_append_left hm, getElem?_drop, ← add_mod_mod]
rw [length_drop, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hm
rw [mod_eq_of_lt hm, Nat.add_comm]
· have hlt : n % length l < length l := mod_lt _ (m.zero_le.trans_lt hml)
rw [getElem?_append_right hm, getElem?_take_of_lt, length_drop]
· congr 1
rw [length_drop] at hm
have hm' := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 hm
have : n % length l + m - length l < length l := by
rw [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add hm']
exact Nat.add_lt_add hlt hml
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm m, ← mod_add_mod, mod_eq_sub_mod hm', mod_eq_of_lt this]
omega
· rwa [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add' hm, length_drop, Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le]
theorem getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (h : k < (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n)[k] =
l[(k + n) % l.length]'(mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_rotate]
exact h.trans_eq (length_rotate _ _)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated getElem?_rotate (since := "2025-02-14")]
theorem get?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n).get? m = l.get? ((m + n) % l.length) := by
simp only [get?_eq_getElem?, length_rotate, hml, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_rotate]
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
theorem get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n).get k = l.get ⟨(k + n) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.pos)⟩ := by
simp [getElem_rotate]
theorem head?_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) : head? (l.rotate n) = l[n]? := by
rw [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_rotate (n.zero_le.trans_lt h), Nat.zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem get_rotate_one (l : List α) (k : Fin (l.rotate 1).length) :
(l.rotate 1).get k = l.get ⟨(k + 1) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l 1 ▸ k.pos)⟩ :=
get_rotate l 1 k
/-- A version of `List.getElem_rotate` that represents `l[k]` in terms of
`(List.rotate l n)[⋯]`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.getElem_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem getElem_eq_getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (hk : k < l.length) :
l[k] = ((l.rotate n)[(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length]'
((Nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm)) := by
rw [getElem_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [hk, (mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).le]
/-- A version of `List.get_rotate` that represents `List.get l` in terms of
`List.get (List.rotate l n)`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.get_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem get_eq_get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin l.length) :
l.get k = (l.rotate n).get ⟨(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length,
(Nat.mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm⟩ := by
rw [get_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [k.2, (mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).le]
theorem rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [hα : Nonempty α] :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = replicate l.length a
| [] => by simp
| a :: l => ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ext_getElem length_replicate.symm fun n h₁ h₂ => by
rw [getElem_replicate, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← head?_rotate h₁, h,
| head?_cons]⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ n => by rw [hb, rotate_replicate]⟩
theorem rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [Nonempty α] {l : List α} :
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 261 | 264 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Julian Kuelshammer, Heather Macbeth, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Chebyshev polynomials
The Chebyshev polynomials are families of polynomials indexed by `ℤ`,
with integral coefficients.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.U`: the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind (also known as the
Vieta–Lucas polynomials), given by $C_n(2x) = 2T_n(x)$.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.S`: the rescaled Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind (also known as the
Vieta–Fibonacci polynomials), given by $S_n(2x) = U_n(x)$.
## Main statements
* The formal derivative of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind is a scalar multiple of the
Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul_T`, twice the product of the `m`-th and `k`-th Chebyshev polynomials
of the first kind is the sum of the `m + k`-th and `m - k`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first
kind. There is a similar statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul_C` for the `C` polynomials.
* `Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_mul`, the `(m * n)`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind is the
composition of the `m`-th and `n`-th Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. There is a similar
statement `Polynomial.Chebyshev.C_mul` for the `C` polynomials.
## Implementation details
Since Chebyshev polynomials have interesting behaviour over the complex numbers and modulo `p`,
we define them to have coefficients in an arbitrary commutative ring, even though
technically `ℤ` would suffice.
The benefit of allowing arbitrary coefficient rings, is that the statements afterwards are clean,
and do not have `map (Int.castRingHom R)` interfering all the time.
## References
[Lionel Ponton, _Roots of the Chebyshev polynomials: A purely algebraic approach_]
[ponton2020chebyshev]
## TODO
* Redefine and/or relate the definition of Chebyshev polynomials to `LinearRecurrence`.
* Add explicit formula involving square roots for Chebyshev polynomials
* Compute zeroes and extrema of Chebyshev polynomials.
* Prove that the roots of the Chebyshev polynomials (except 0) are irrational.
* Prove minimax properties of Chebyshev polynomials.
-/
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
open Polynomial
variable (R R' : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing R']
/-- `T n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
/-- Induction principle used for proving facts about Chebyshev polynomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_sub_two (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 2) = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem T_sub_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_eq (n : ℤ) : T R n = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem T_zero : T R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem T_one : T R 1 = X := rfl
theorem T_neg_one : T R (-1) = X := show 2 * X * 1 - X = X by ring
theorem T_two : T R 2 = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
simpa [pow_two, mul_assoc] using T_add_two R 0
@[simp]
theorem T_neg (n : ℤ) : T R (-n) = T R n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => rfl
| one => show 2 * X * 1 - X = X; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_two R n
have h₂ := T_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 - h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_one R n
have h₂ := T_sub_one R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X : R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ - h₂
theorem T_natAbs (n : ℤ) : T R n.natAbs = T R n := by
obtain h | h := Int.natAbs_eq n <;> nth_rw 2 [h]; simp
theorem T_neg_two : T R (-2) = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by simp [T_two]
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval 1 = 1 := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_add_two, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 => simp [T_sub_one, -T_neg, ih1, ih2]; norm_num
@[simp]
theorem T_eval_neg_one (n : ℤ) : (T R n).eval (-1) = n.negOnePow := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_add_two, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1,
Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg, ih2,
Int.negOnePow_def 2]
norm_cast
norm_num
ring
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [T_sub_one, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_ofNat, eval_X, mul_neg, mul_one, ih1, neg_mul,
ih2, Int.negOnePow_add, Int.negOnePow_one, Units.val_neg, Int.cast_neg, sub_neg_eq_add,
Int.negOnePow_sub]
ring
/-- `U n` is the `n`-th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind. -/
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def U : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => 2 * X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * U (n + 1) - U n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * U (-n) - U (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_add_two : ∀ n, U R (n + 2) = 2 * X * U R (n + 1) - U R n
| (k : ℕ) => U.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) U.eq_4 R k
theorem U_add_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 2) = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem U_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_eq (n : ℤ) : U R n = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
@[simp]
theorem U_zero : U R 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_one : U R 1 = 2 * X := rfl
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_one : U R (-1) = 0 := by simpa using U_sub_one R 0
theorem U_two : U R 2 = 4 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
have := U_add_two R 0
simp only [zero_add, U_one, U_zero] at this
linear_combination this
@[simp]
| theorem U_neg_two : U R (-2) = -1 := by
simpa [zero_sub, Int.reduceNeg, U_neg_one, mul_zero, U_zero] using U_sub_two R 0
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 203 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
(hs.subset inter_subset_left).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_add_encard_inter]
theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_union (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
rw [add_comm, ncard_union_add_ncard_inter _ _ hs ht]
theorem ncard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard + t.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := (s ∪ t).finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac
rw [h.cast_ncard_eq, (h.subset subset_union_left).cast_ncard_eq,
(h.subset subset_union_right).cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_union_le
rw [h.ncard]
apply zero_le
theorem ncard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_eq h]
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard + s.ncard = t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq, ht.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h]
theorem ncard_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
obtain ht | ht := t.finite_or_infinite
· rw [← ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset hst ht, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.zero_sub, (ht.diff hs).ncard]
lemma cast_ncard_sdiff {R : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne R] (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((t \ s).ncard : R) = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_diff hst (ht.subset hst), Nat.cast_sub (ncard_le_ncard hst ht)]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ (s \ t).ncard + t.ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem le_ncard_diff (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
t.ncard - s.ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr (by rw [add_comm]; apply ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard _ _ hs)
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ t).ncard + t.ncard = (s ∪ t).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left hs.diff ht, diff_union_self]
theorem diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, diff_eq_empty]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (ncard_le_ncard h' hs)
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s :=
diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard h hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard (s t : Set α)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s \ t).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_right)
(hs.inter_of_left _) hs.diff, union_comm, diff_union_inter]
theorem ncard_eq_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_eq_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard = t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard = (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_right_inj]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_le_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_lt_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_lt_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard < t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard < (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_add_ncard_compl (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(hsc : sᶜ.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard + sᶜ.ncard = Nat.card α := by
rw [← ncard_univ, ← ncard_union_eq (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ s) hs hsc, union_compl_self]
theorem eq_univ_iff_ncard [Finite α] (s : Set α) :
s = univ ↔ ncard s = Nat.card α := by
rw [← compl_empty_iff, ← ncard_eq_zero, ← ncard_add_ncard_compl s, left_eq_add]
lemma even_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Even sᶜ.ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
simp [compl_eq_univ_diff, ncard_diff (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ),
Nat.even_sub (ncard_le_ncard (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ)),
(ncard_univ _).symm ▸ heven]
lemma odd_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Odd sᶜ.ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, even_ncard_compl_iff heven, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end Lattice
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq {n : ℕ} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : s.ncard ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ t.ncard) :
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ u.ncard = n := by
obtain ht | ht := t.infinite_or_finite
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.le_zero, ← ht.ncard] at hnt
exact ⟨t, hst, Subset.rfl, hnt.symm⟩
lift s to Finset α using ht.subset hst
lift t to Finset α using ht
obtain ⟨u, hsu, hut, hu⟩ := Finset.exists_subsuperset_card_eq (mod_cast hst) (by simpa using hsn)
(mod_cast hnt)
exact ⟨u, mod_cast hsu, mod_cast hut, mod_cast hu⟩
/-- We can shrink a set to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_subset_card_eq {n : ℕ} (hns : n ≤ s.ncard) : ∃ t ⊆ s, t.ncard = n := by
simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.empty_subset (by simp) hns
theorem Infinite.exists_subset_ncard_eq {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) (k : ℕ) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Finite ∧ t.ncard = k := by
have := hs.to_subtype
obtain ⟨t', -, rfl⟩ := @Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq s univ infinite_univ k
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' (t' : Set s), by simp, Finite.image _ (by simp), ?_⟩
rw [ncard_image_of_injective _ Subtype.coe_injective]
simp
theorem Infinite.exists_superset_ncard_eq {s t : Set α} (ht : t.Infinite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : s.Finite) {k : ℕ} (hsk : s.ncard ≤ k) : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ t ∧ s'.ncard = k := by
obtain ⟨s₁, hs₁, hs₁fin, hs₁card⟩ := (ht.diff hs).exists_subset_ncard_eq (k - s.ncard)
refine ⟨s ∪ s₁, subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hs₁.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rwa [ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hs₁ disjoint_sdiff_right) hs hs₁fin, hs₁card,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le]
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_ncard {n : ℕ} (hst : 2 * n < (s ∪ t).ncard) :
∃ r : Set α, n < r.ncard ∧ (r ⊆ s ∨ r ⊆ t) := by
classical
have hu := finite_of_ncard_ne_zero ((Nat.zero_le _).trans_lt hst).ne.symm
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hu,
Finite.toFinset_union (hu.subset subset_union_left)
(hu.subset subset_union_right)] at hst
obtain ⟨r', hnr', hr'⟩ := Finset.exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card hst
exact ⟨r', by simpa, by simpa using hr'⟩
/-! ### Explicit description of a set from its cardinality -/
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_one : s.ncard = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; rw [ncard_singleton]⟩
have hft := (finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (ne_zero_of_eq_one h)).fintype
simp_rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card', @Finset.card_eq_one _ (toFinset s)] at h
refine h.imp fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton] at ha
exact ha
theorem exists_eq_insert_iff_ncard (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s.ncard + 1 = t.ncard := by
classical
rcases t.finite_or_infinite with ht | ht
· rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs, ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ ht,
← @Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset _ _ _ hs ht, ← Finset.exists_eq_insert_iff]
convert Iff.rfl using 2; simp only [Finite.mem_toFinset]
ext x
simp [Finset.ext_iff, Set.ext_iff]
simp only [ht.ncard, exists_prop, add_eq_zero, and_false, iff_false, not_exists, not_and,
reduceCtorEq]
rintro x - rfl
exact ht (hs.insert x)
|
theorem ncard_le_one (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b := by
simp_rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs, Finset.card_le_one, Finite.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem ncard_le_one_iff_subsingleton [Finite s] :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
ncard_le_one <| inferInstanceAs (Finite s)
theorem ncard_le_one_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [ncard_le_one hs]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 1,017 | 1,028 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
| {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 284 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Opposite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Bilinear
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines the conversion between sesquilinear maps and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂` given a basis define a bilinear map
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'` define the bilinear map on `n → R`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear map
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear map on `n → R`
## TODO
At the moment this is quite a literal port from `Matrix.BilinearForm`. Everything should be
generalized to fully semibilinear forms.
## Tags
Sesquilinear form, Sesquilinear map, matrix, basis
-/
variable {R R₁ S₁ R₂ S₂ M₁ M₂ M₁' M₂' N₂ n m n' m' ι : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
open scoped RightActions
section AuxToLinearMap
variable [Semiring R₁] [Semiring S₁] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring S₂] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
[Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable (σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁) (σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂)
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear maps on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'`. -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m N₂) : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂ :=
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
mk₂'ₛₗ σ₁ σ₂ (fun (v : n → R₁) (w : m → R₂) => ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₂ (w j) • σ₁ (v i) • f i j)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, smul_add, sum_add_distrib, add_smul])
(fun c v w => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_sum, smul_eq_mul, σ₁.map_mul, ← smul_comm _ (σ₁ c),
MulAction.mul_smul])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, sum_add_distrib])
(fun _ v w => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, map_mul, MulAction.mul_smul, smul_sum])
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single (f : Matrix n m N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = f i j := by
rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
have : (∑ i', ∑ j', (if i = i' then (1 : S₁) else (0 : S₁)) •
(if j = j' then (1 : S₂) else (0 : S₂)) • f i' j') =
f i j := by
simp_rw [← Finset.smul_sum]
simp only [op_smul_eq_smul, ite_smul, one_smul, zero_smul, sum_ite_eq, mem_univ, ↓reduceIte]
rw [← this]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by aesop
end AuxToLinearMap
section AuxToMatrix
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring S₁] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring S₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
[Module R N₂] [Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂] [SMulCommClass S₁ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ R N₂]
[SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂}
variable (R)
/-- The linear map from sesquilinear maps to `Matrix n m N₂` given an `n`-indexed basis for `M₁`
and an `m`-indexed basis for `M₂`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂) :
(M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) →ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ where
toFun f := of fun i j => f (b₁ i) (b₂ j)
map_add' _f _g := rfl
map_smul' _f _g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply (f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂)
(i : n) (j : m) : LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R b₁ b₂ f i j = f (b₁ i) (b₂ j) :=
rfl
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux (f : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1) (fun j => Pi.single j 1) f) =
f := by
refine ext_basis (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) (Pi.basisFun R₂ m) fun i j => ?_
simp_rw [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
theorem Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1)
(fun j => Pi.single j 1) (f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂) =
f := by
ext i j
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single]
end CommSemiring
end AuxToMatrix
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### Bilinear maps over `n → R`
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and sesquilinear maps on `n → R`.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₂] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
[Semiring S₁] [Semiring S₂] [Module S₁ N₂] [Module S₂ N₂]
[SMulCommClass S₁ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ R N₂] [SMulCommClass S₂ S₁ N₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* S₁} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* S₂}
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable (R)
/-- The linear equivalence between sesquilinear maps and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' : ((n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R (fun i => Pi.single i 1) (fun j => Pi.single j 1) with
toFun := LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R _ _
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
left_inv := LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux R
right_inv := Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux R }
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear maps and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂' : ((n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R
variable (σ₁ σ₂)
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and sesquilinear maps on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).symm
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear maps on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂' : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] (n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R).symm
variable {R}
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq (M : Matrix n m N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ M = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m N₂) (x : n → R₁) (y : m → R₂) :
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (x i) • σ₂ (y j) • M i j := by
rw [toLinearMapₛₗ₂', toMatrixₛₗ₂', LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk, toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by
rw [smul_comm]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m N₂) (x : n → S₁) (y : m → S₂) :
-- porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, x i • y j • M i j :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by
rw [RingHom.id_apply, RingHom.id_apply, smul_comm]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply' {T : Type*} [CommSemiring T] (M : Matrix n m T) (v : n → T)
(w : m → T) : Matrix.toLinearMap₂' T M v w = dotProduct v (M *ᵥ w) := by
simp_rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply, dotProduct, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm (w _), ← mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_single (M : Matrix n m N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single σ₁ σ₂ M i j
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_single (M : Matrix n m N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R M (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single _ _ M i j
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_symm :
((LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).symm : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_symm :
((Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂).symm : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂) = LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).symm_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R B) = B :=
(Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂).apply_symm_apply B
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R (LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R B) = B :=
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R).apply_symm_apply B
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMapₛₗ₂' (M : Matrix n m N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R (Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' R σ₁ σ₂ M) = M :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂' (M : Matrix n m N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R (S₁ := S₁) (S₂ := S₂) M) = M :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R).apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_apply (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' R B i j = B (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply (B : (n → S₁) →ₗ[S₁] (m → S₂) →ₗ[S₂] N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R B i j = B (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) :=
rfl
end ToMatrix'
section CommToMatrix'
-- TODO: Introduce matrix multiplication by matrices of scalars
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable [Fintype n'] [Fintype m']
variable [DecidableEq n'] [DecidableEq m']
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (l : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R)
(r : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' R (B.compl₁₂ l r) = (toMatrix' l)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' R B * toMatrix' r := by
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearMap.compl₁₂_apply, transpose_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, sum_mul]
rw [sum_comm]
conv_lhs => rw [← LinearMap.sum_repr_mul_repr_mul (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) (l _) (r _)]
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i' -
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro j' -
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.basisFun_repr, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm,
Pi.basisFun_apply, of_apply]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, Finsupp.sum_zero]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
toMatrix₂' R (B.comp f) = (toMatrix' f)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' R B := by
rw [← LinearMap.compl₂_id (B.comp f), ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' R (B.compl₂ f) = toMatrix₂' R B * toMatrix' f := by
rw [← LinearMap.comp_id B, ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R)
(N : Matrix m m' R) :
M * toMatrix₂' R B * N = toMatrix₂' R (B.compl₁₂ (toLin' Mᵀ) (toLin' N)) := by
simp
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix' (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R) :
M * toMatrix₂' R B = toMatrix₂' R (B.comp <| toLin' Mᵀ) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_comp, transpose_transpose, toMatrix'_toLin']
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix m m' R) :
toMatrix₂' R B * M = toMatrix₂' R (B.compl₂ <| toLin' M) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_compl₂, toMatrix'_toLin']
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_comp (M : Matrix n m R) (P : Matrix n n' R) (Q : Matrix m m' R) :
LinearMap.compl₁₂ (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R M) (toLin' P) (toLin' Q) =
toLinearMap₂' R (Pᵀ * M * Q) :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R).injective (by simp)
end CommToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
/-! ### Bilinear maps over arbitrary vector spaces
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear maps on
a module with a fixed basis.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
[Module R N₂]
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
section
variable (b₁ : Basis n R M₁) (b₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear maps on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively. -/
noncomputable def LinearMap.toMatrix₂ : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m N₂ :=
(b₁.equivFun.arrowCongr (b₂.equivFun.arrowCongr (LinearEquiv.refl R N₂))).trans
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R)
/-- `Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear maps on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively; this is the reverse direction of `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂`. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.toLinearMap₂ : Matrix n m N₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm
-- We make this and not `LinearMap.toMatrix₂` a `simp` lemma to avoid timeouts
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B i j = B (b₁ i) (b₂ j) := by
simp only [toMatrix₂, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply,
Basis.equivFun_symm_apply, Pi.single_apply, ite_smul, one_smul, zero_smul, sum_ite_eq',
mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_apply (M : Matrix n m N₂) (x : M₁) (y : M₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, b₁.repr x i • b₂.repr y j • M i j :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ =>
smul_algebra_smul_comm ((RingHom.id R) ((Basis.equivFun b₁) x _))
((RingHom.id R) ((Basis.equivFun b₂) y _)) (M _ _)
-- Not a `simp` lemma since `LinearMap.toMatrix₂` needs an extra argument
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_eq (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R b₁ b₂ B = LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B :=
Matrix.ext fun i j => by rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm = Matrix.toLinearMap₂ (N₂ := N₂) b₁ b₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_symm :
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂).symm = LinearMap.toMatrix₂ (N₂ := N₂) b₁ b₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm_symm
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_basisFun :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) =
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R (N₂ := N₂) := by
ext M
simp only [coe_comp, coe_single, Function.comp_apply, toLinearMap₂_apply, Pi.basisFun_repr,
toLinearMap₂'_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_basisFun :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R (N₂ := N₂) := by
ext B
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, Pi.basisFun_apply, Pi.basisFun_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_toMatrix₂ (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ (LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B) = B :=
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂).apply_symm_apply B
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_toLinearMap₂ (M : Matrix n m N₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ (Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ M) = M :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).apply_symm_apply M
variable (b₁ : Basis n R M₁) (b₂ : Basis m R M₂)
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁'] [Module R M₁']
variable [AddCommMonoid M₂'] [Module R M₂']
variable (b₁' : Basis n' R M₁')
variable (b₂' : Basis m' R M₂')
variable [Fintype n'] [Fintype m']
variable [DecidableEq n'] [DecidableEq m']
-- Cannot be a `simp` lemma because `b₁` and `b₂` must be inferred.
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (l : M₁' →ₗ[R] M₁)
(r : M₂' →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁' b₂' (B.compl₁₂ l r) =
(toMatrix b₁' b₁ l)ᵀ * LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B * toMatrix b₂' b₂ r := by
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply, compl₁₂_apply, transpose_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_mk, sum_mul]
rw [sum_comm]
conv_lhs => rw [← LinearMap.sum_repr_mul_repr_mul b₁ b₂]
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i' -
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro j' -
simp only [smul_eq_mul, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Basis.equivFun_apply, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, Finsupp.sum_zero]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_comp (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (f : M₁' →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁' b₂ (B.comp f) =
(toMatrix b₁' b₁ f)ᵀ * LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B := by
rw [← LinearMap.compl₂_id (B.comp f), ← LinearMap.compl₁₂, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ b₁ b₂]
simp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₂ (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (f : M₂' →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂' (B.compl₂ f) =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B * toMatrix b₂' b₂ f := by
rw [← LinearMap.comp_id B, ← LinearMap.compl₁₂, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ b₁ b₂]
simp
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_mul_basis_toMatrix (c₁ : Basis n' R M₁) (c₂ : Basis m' R M₂)
(B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) :
(b₁.toMatrix c₁)ᵀ * LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B * b₂.toMatrix c₂ =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ c₁ c₂ B := by
simp_rw [← LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix]
rw [← LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂, LinearMap.compl₁₂_id_id]
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂_mul (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R)
(N : Matrix m m' R) :
M * LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B * N =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁' b₂' (B.compl₁₂ (toLin b₁' b₁ Mᵀ) (toLin b₂' b₂ N)) := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ b₁ b₂, toMatrix_toLin, transpose_transpose]
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂ (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R) :
M * LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁' b₂ (B.comp (toLin b₁' b₁ Mᵀ)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_comp b₁, toMatrix_toLin, transpose_transpose]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_mul (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix m m' R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B * M =
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂' (B.compl₂ (toLin b₂' b₂ M)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₂ b₁ b₂, toMatrix_toLin]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂_compl₁₂ (M : Matrix n m R) (P : Matrix n n' R) (Q : Matrix m m' R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂ M).compl₁₂ (toLin b₁' b₁ P) (toLin b₂' b₂ Q) =
Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁' b₂' (Pᵀ * M * Q) :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁' b₂').injective
(by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ b₁ b₂, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_toLinearMap₂,
toMatrix_toLin])
end
end ToMatrix
/-! ### Adjoint pairs -/
section MatrixAdjoints
open Matrix
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype n']
variable (b₁ : Basis n R M₁) (b₂ : Basis n' R M₂)
variable (J J₂ : Matrix n n R) (J' : Matrix n' n' R)
variable (A : Matrix n' n R) (A' : Matrix n n' R)
variable (A₁ A₂ : Matrix n n R)
/-- The condition for the matrices `A`, `A'` to be an adjoint pair with respect to the square
matrices `J`, `J₃`. -/
def Matrix.IsAdjointPair :=
Aᵀ * J' = J * A'
/-- The condition for a square matrix `A` to be self-adjoint with respect to the square matrix
`J`. -/
def Matrix.IsSelfAdjoint :=
Matrix.IsAdjointPair J J A₁ A₁
/-- The condition for a square matrix `A` to be skew-adjoint with respect to the square matrix
`J`. -/
def Matrix.IsSkewAdjoint :=
Matrix.IsAdjointPair J J A₁ (-A₁)
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq n']
@[simp]
theorem isAdjointPair_toLinearMap₂' :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R J) (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' R J')
(Matrix.toLin' A) (Matrix.toLin' A') ↔
Matrix.IsAdjointPair J J' A A' := by
rw [isAdjointPair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂]
have h :
∀ B B' : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (n' → R) →ₗ[R] R,
B = B' ↔ LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R B = LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R B' := by
intro B B'
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· exact (LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R).injective h
simp_rw [h, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂,
LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin', LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂']
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAdjointPair_toLinearMap₂ :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₁ J)
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₂ b₂ J') (Matrix.toLin b₁ b₂ A) (Matrix.toLin b₂ b₁ A') ↔
Matrix.IsAdjointPair J J' A A' := by
rw [isAdjointPair_iff_comp_eq_compl₂]
| have h :
∀ B B' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R,
B = B' ↔ LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B = LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B' := by
intro B B'
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· exact (LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).injective h
simp_rw [h, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_comp b₂ b₂, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₂ b₁ b₁,
LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin, LinearMap.toMatrix₂_toLinearMap₂]
rfl
theorem Matrix.isAdjointPair_equiv (P : Matrix n n R) (h : IsUnit P) :
(Pᵀ * J * P).IsAdjointPair (Pᵀ * J * P) A₁ A₂ ↔
J.IsAdjointPair J (P * A₁ * P⁻¹) (P * A₂ * P⁻¹) := by
have h' : IsUnit P.det := P.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SesquilinearForm.lean | 528 | 542 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Additional lemmas about elements of a ring satisfying `IsCoprime`
and elements of a monoid satisfying `IsRelPrime`
These lemmas are in a separate file to the definition of `IsCoprime` or `IsRelPrime`
as they require more imports.
Notably, this includes lemmas about `Finset.prod` as this requires importing BigOperators, and
lemmas about `Pow` since these are easiest to prove via `Finset.prod`.
-/
universe u v
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section IsCoprime
variable {R : Type u} {I : Type v} [CommSemiring R] {x y z : R} {s : I → R} {t : Finset I}
section
theorem Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℤ} : IsCoprime m n ↔ Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h⟩
refine Nat.dvd_one.mp (Int.gcd_dvd_iff.mpr ⟨a, b, ?_⟩)
rwa [mul_comm m, mul_comm n, eq_comm]
· rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, IsCoprime, Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, mul_comm m, mul_comm n, Nat.cast_one]
intro h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime {m n : ℕ} : IsCoprime (m : ℤ) n ↔ Nat.Coprime m n := by
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
alias ⟨IsCoprime.nat_coprime, Nat.Coprime.isCoprime⟩ := Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime
theorem Nat.Coprime.cast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℕ} (h : Nat.Coprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_coprime] at h
| rw [← Int.cast_natCast a, ← Int.cast_natCast b]
exact IsCoprime.intCast h
theorem ne_zero_or_ne_zero_of_nat_coprime {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [Nontrivial A] {a b : ℕ}
(h : Nat.Coprime a b) : (a : A) ≠ 0 ∨ (b : A) ≠ 0 :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Lemmas.lean | 50 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Sabbir Rahman
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about powers in ordered fields.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
open Function Int
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b : α} {n : ℤ}
protected theorem Even.zpow_nonneg (hn : Even n) (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ n := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; rw [zpow_add' (by simp [em'])]; exact mul_self_nonneg _
lemma zpow_two_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ (2 : ℤ) := even_two.zpow_nonneg _
lemma zpow_neg_two_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ a ^ (-2 : ℤ) := even_neg_two.zpow_nonneg _
protected lemma Even.zpow_pos (hn : Even n) (ha : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n :=
(hn.zpow_nonneg _).lt_of_ne' (zpow_ne_zero _ ha)
lemma zpow_two_pos_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ (2 : ℤ) := even_two.zpow_pos ha
theorem Even.zpow_pos_iff (hn : Even n) (h : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [zpow_add' (by simp [em']), mul_self_pos, zpow_ne_zero_iff (by simpa using h)]
theorem Odd.zpow_neg_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n < 0 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (zpow_nonneg · _), fun ha ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [zpow_add_one₀ ha.ne]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg (Even.zpow_pos (even_two_mul _) ha.ne) ha
protected lemma Odd.zpow_nonneg_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 ≤ a ^ n ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 hn.zpow_neg_iff
theorem Odd.zpow_nonpos_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq, hn.zpow_neg_iff, zpow_eq_zero_iff]
rintro rfl
exact Int.not_even_iff_odd.2 hn .zero
lemma Odd.zpow_pos_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a := lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le hn.zpow_nonpos_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.zpow_neg⟩ := Odd.zpow_neg_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.zpow_nonpos⟩ := Odd.zpow_nonpos_iff
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing α] in
theorem Even.zpow_abs {p : ℤ} (hp : Even p) (a : α) : |a| ^ p = a ^ p := by
rcases abs_choice a with h | h <;> simp only [h, hp.neg_zpow _]
lemma zpow_eq_zpow_iff_of_ne_zero₀ (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n :=
match n with
| Int.ofNat m => by
simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, ne_eq, Nat.cast_eq_zero, zpow_natCast, Int.even_coe_nat] at *
exact pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero hn
| Int.negSucc m => by
simp only [← neg_ofNat_succ, ne_eq, neg_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast,
inv_inj, even_neg, Int.even_coe_nat] at *
exact pow_eq_pow_iff_of_ne_zero hn
lemma zpow_eq_zpow_iff_cases₀ : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b ∨ a = -b ∧ Even n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn <;> simp [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_of_ne_zero₀, *]
lemma zpow_eq_one_iff_of_ne_zero₀ (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ∧ Even n := by
simp [← zpow_eq_zpow_iff_of_ne_zero₀ hn]
lemma zpow_eq_one_iff_cases₀ : a ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 ∧ Even n := by
simp [← zpow_eq_zpow_iff_cases₀]
lemma zpow_eq_neg_zpow_iff₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a ^ n = -b ^ n ↔ a = -b ∧ Odd n :=
match n with
| Int.ofNat m => by
simp [pow_eq_neg_pow_iff, hb]
| Int.negSucc m => by
simp only [← neg_ofNat_succ, zpow_neg, inv_pow, ← inv_neg, pow_eq_neg_pow_iff hb, inv_inj,
zpow_natCast]
simp [parity_simps]
lemma zpow_eq_neg_one_iff₀ : a ^ n = -1 ↔ a = -1 ∧ Odd n := by
simpa using zpow_eq_neg_zpow_iff₀ (α := α) one_ne_zero
/-! ### Bernoulli's inequality -/
/-- Bernoulli's inequality reformulated to estimate `(n : α)`. -/
theorem Nat.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub (H : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : (n : α) ≤ (a ^ n - 1) / (a - 1) :=
(le_div_iff₀ (sub_pos.2 H)).2 <|
le_sub_left_of_add_le <| one_add_mul_sub_le_pow ((neg_le_self zero_le_one).trans H.le) _
/-- For any `a > 1` and a natural `n` we have `n ≤ a ^ n / (a - 1)`. See also
`Nat.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub` for a stronger inequality with `a ^ n - 1` in the numerator. -/
theorem Nat.cast_le_pow_div_sub (H : 1 < a) (n : ℕ) : (n : α) ≤ a ^ n / (a - 1) :=
(n.cast_le_pow_sub_div_sub H).trans <|
div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (sub_le_self _ zero_le_one) (sub_nonneg.2 H.le)
end LinearOrderedField
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- The `positivity` extension which identifies expressions of the form `a ^ (b : ℤ)`,
such that `positivity` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`. -/
@[positivity _ ^ (_ : ℤ), Pow.pow _ (_ : ℤ)]
def evalZPow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} zα pα e := do
let .app (.app _ (a : Q($α))) (b : Q(ℤ)) ← withReducible (whnf e) | throwError "not ^"
let result ← catchNone do
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(Field $α)
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(LinearOrder $α)
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(IsStrictOrderedRing $α)
assumeInstancesCommute
match ← whnfR b with
| .app (.app (.app (.const `OfNat.ofNat _) _) (.lit (Literal.natVal n))) _ =>
guard (n % 2 = 0)
have m : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (n / 2)
haveI' : $b =Q $m + $m := ⟨⟩
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
pure (.nonnegative q(Even.zpow_nonneg (Even.add_self _) $a))
| .app (.app (.app (.const `Neg.neg _) _) _) b' =>
let b' ← whnfR b'
let .true := b'.isAppOfArity ``OfNat.ofNat 3 | throwError "not a ^ -n where n is a literal"
let some n := (b'.getRevArg! 1).rawNatLit? | throwError "not a ^ -n where n is a literal"
guard (n % 2 = 0)
have m : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (n / 2)
haveI' : $b =Q (-$m) + (-$m) := ⟨⟩
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
pure (.nonnegative q(Even.zpow_nonneg (Even.add_self _) $a))
| _ => throwError "not a ^ n where n is a literal or a negated literal"
orElse result do
let ra ← core zα pα a
let ofNonneg (pa : Q(0 ≤ $a))
(_oα : Q(Semifield $α)) (_oα : Q(LinearOrder $α)) (_oα : Q(IsStrictOrderedRing $α)) :
MetaM (Strictness zα pα e) := do
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
assumeInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(zpow_nonneg $pa $b))
let ofNonzero (pa : Q($a ≠ 0)) (_oα : Q(GroupWithZero $α)) : MetaM (Strictness zα pα e) := do
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(GroupWithZero $α)
assumeInstancesCommute
pure (.nonzero q(zpow_ne_zero $b $pa))
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
try
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(Semifield $α)
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(LinearOrder $α)
let _a ← synthInstanceQ q(IsStrictOrderedRing $α)
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
assumeInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(zpow_pos $pa $b))
catch e : Exception =>
trace[Tactic.positivity.failure] "{e.toMessageData}"
let sα ← synthInstanceQ q(Semifield $α)
let oα ← synthInstanceQ q(LinearOrder $α)
let iα ← synthInstanceQ q(IsStrictOrderedRing $α)
orElse (← catchNone (ofNonneg q(le_of_lt $pa) sα oα iα))
(ofNonzero q(ne_of_gt $pa) q(inferInstance))
| .nonnegative pa =>
ofNonneg pa (← synthInstanceQ (_ : Q(Type u)))
(← synthInstanceQ (_ : Q(Type u))) (← synthInstanceQ (_ : Q(Prop)))
| .nonzero pa => ofNonzero pa (← synthInstanceQ (_ : Q(Type u)))
| .none => pure .none
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Power.lean | 181 | 182 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Lists from functions
Theorems and lemmas for dealing with `List.ofFn`, which converts a function on `Fin n` to a list
of length `n`.
## Main Statements
The main statements pertain to lists generated using `List.ofFn`
- `List.get?_ofFn`, which tells us the nth element of such a list
- `List.equivSigmaTuple`, which is an `Equiv` between lists and the functions that generate them
via `List.ofFn`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat
namespace List
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f (Fin.cast (by simp) i) := by
simp; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get?_ofFn := List.getElem?_ofFn
@[simp]
theorem map_ofFn {β : Type*} {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) (g : α → β) :
map g (ofFn f) = ofFn (g ∘ f) :=
ext_get (by simp) fun i h h' => by simp
@[congr]
theorem ofFn_congr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) (f : Fin m → α) :
ofFn f = ofFn fun i : Fin n => f (Fin.cast h.symm i) := by
subst h
simp_rw [Fin.cast_refl, id]
theorem ofFn_succ' {n} (f : Fin (succ n) → α) :
ofFn f = (ofFn fun i => f (Fin.castSucc i)).concat (f (Fin.last _)) := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [ofFn_zero, concat_nil, ofFn_succ, ofFn_zero]
rfl
· rw [ofFn_succ, IH, ofFn_succ, concat_cons, Fin.castSucc_zero]
congr
/-- Note this matches the convention of `List.ofFn_succ'`, putting the `Fin m` elements first. -/
theorem ofFn_add {m n} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) :
List.ofFn f =
(List.ofFn fun i => f (Fin.castAdd n i)) ++ List.ofFn fun j => f (Fin.natAdd m j) := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [ofFn_zero, append_nil, Fin.castAdd_zero, Fin.cast_refl]
rfl
· rw [ofFn_succ', ofFn_succ', IH, append_concat]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_fin_append {m n} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) :
List.ofFn (Fin.append a b) = List.ofFn a ++ List.ofFn b := by
simp_rw [ofFn_add, Fin.append_left, Fin.append_right]
/-- This breaks a list of `m*n` items into `m` groups each containing `n` elements. -/
theorem ofFn_mul {m n} (f : Fin (m * n) → α) :
List.ofFn f = List.flatten (List.ofFn fun i : Fin m => List.ofFn fun j : Fin n => f ⟨i * n + j,
calc
↑i * n + j < (i + 1) * n :=
(Nat.add_lt_add_left j.prop _).trans_eq (by rw [Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul])
_ ≤ _ := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ i.prop⟩) := by
induction' m with m IH
· simp [ofFn_zero, Nat.zero_mul, ofFn_zero, flatten]
· simp_rw [ofFn_succ', succ_mul]
simp [flatten_concat, ofFn_add, IH]
rfl
/-- This breaks a list of `m*n` items into `n` groups each containing `m` elements. -/
theorem ofFn_mul' {m n} (f : Fin (m * n) → α) :
List.ofFn f = List.flatten (List.ofFn fun i : Fin n => List.ofFn fun j : Fin m => f ⟨m * i + j,
calc
m * i + j < m * (i + 1) :=
(Nat.add_lt_add_left j.prop _).trans_eq (by rw [Nat.mul_add, Nat.mul_one])
_ ≤ _ := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ i.prop⟩) := by simp_rw [m.mul_comm, ofFn_mul, Fin.cast_mk]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get : ∀ l : List α, (ofFn (get l)) = l
| [] => by rw [ofFn_zero]
| a :: l => by
rw [ofFn_succ]
congr
exact ofFn_get l
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_getElem : ∀ l : List α, (ofFn (fun i : Fin l.length => l[(i : Nat)])) = l
| [] => by rw [ofFn_zero]
| a :: l => by
rw [ofFn_succ]
congr
exact ofFn_get l
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_getElem_eq_map {β : Type*} (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
ofFn (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = l.map f := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, ← map_ofFn, ofFn_getElem]
-- Note there is a now another `mem_ofFn` defined in Lean, with an existential on the RHS,
-- which is marked as a simp lemma.
theorem mem_ofFn' {n} (f : Fin n → α) (a : α) : a ∈ ofFn f ↔ a ∈ Set.range f := by
simp only [mem_iff_get, Set.mem_range, get_ofFn]
exact ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨Fin.cast (by simp) i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨Fin.cast (by simp) i, hi⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_ofFn_iff {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ i ∈ ofFn f, P i) ↔ ∀ j : Fin n, P (f j) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_const : ∀ (n : ℕ) (c : α), (ofFn fun _ : Fin n => c) = replicate n c
| 0, c => by rw [ofFn_zero, replicate_zero]
| n+1, c => by rw [replicate, ← ofFn_const n]; simp
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_fin_repeat {m} (a : Fin m → α) (n : ℕ) :
List.ofFn (Fin.repeat n a) = (List.replicate n (List.ofFn a)).flatten := by
simp_rw [ofFn_mul, ← ofFn_const, Fin.repeat, Fin.modNat, Nat.add_comm,
Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Fin.is_lt _)]
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_ofFn {R : α → α → Prop} {n} {f : Fin n → α} :
(ofFn f).Pairwise R ↔ ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i < j → R (f i) (f j) := by
simp only [pairwise_iff_getElem, length_ofFn, List.getElem_ofFn,
(Fin.rightInverse_cast length_ofFn).surjective.forall, Fin.forall_iff, Fin.cast_mk,
Fin.mk_lt_mk, forall_comm (α := (_ : Prop)) (β := ℕ)]
lemma getLast_ofFn_succ {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) :
(ofFn f).getLast (mt ofFn_eq_nil_iff.1 (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)) = f (Fin.last _) :=
getLast_ofFn _
@[deprecated getLast_ofFn (since := "2024-11-06")]
theorem last_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) (h : ofFn f ≠ [])
(hn : n - 1 < n := Nat.pred_lt <| ofFn_eq_nil_iff.not.mp h) :
getLast (ofFn f) h = f ⟨n - 1, hn⟩ := by simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
@[deprecated getLast_ofFn_succ (since := "2024-11-06")]
theorem last_ofFn_succ {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α)
(h : ofFn f ≠ [] := mt ofFn_eq_nil_iff.mp (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)) :
getLast (ofFn f) h = f (Fin.last _) :=
getLast_ofFn_succ _
lemma ofFn_cons {n} (a : α) (f : Fin n → α) : ofFn (Fin.cons a f) = a :: ofFn f := by
rw [ofFn_succ]
rfl
lemma find?_ofFn_eq_some {n} {f : Fin n → α} {p : α → Bool} {b : α} :
(ofFn f).find? p = some b ↔ p b = true ∧ ∃ i, f i = b ∧ ∀ j < i, ¬(p (f j) = true) := by
rw [find?_eq_some_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨hpb, i, hi, hfb, h⟩ ↦
⟨hpb, ⟨⟨i, length_ofFn (f := f) ▸ hi⟩, by simpa using hfb, fun j hj ↦ by simpa using h j hj⟩⟩,
fun ⟨hpb, i, hfb, h⟩ ↦
⟨hpb, ⟨i, (length_ofFn (f := f)).symm ▸ i.isLt, by simpa using hfb,
fun j hj ↦ by simpa using h ⟨j, by omega⟩ (by simpa using hj)⟩⟩⟩
lemma find?_ofFn_eq_some_of_injective {n} {f : Fin n → α} {p : α → Bool} {i : Fin n}
(h : Function.Injective f) :
(ofFn f).find? p = some (f i) ↔ p (f i) = true ∧ ∀ j < i, ¬(p (f j) = true) := by
simp only [find?_ofFn_eq_some, h.eq_iff, Bool.not_eq_true, exists_eq_left]
/-- Lists are equivalent to the sigma type of tuples of a given length. -/
@[simps]
def equivSigmaTuple : List α ≃ Σn, Fin n → α where
toFun l := ⟨l.length, l.get⟩
invFun f := List.ofFn f.2
left_inv := List.ofFn_get
right_inv := fun ⟨_, f⟩ =>
Fin.sigma_eq_of_eq_comp_cast length_ofFn <| funext fun i => get_ofFn f i
/-- A recursor for lists that expands a list into a function mapping to its elements.
This can be used with `induction l using List.ofFnRec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def ofFnRec {C : List α → Sort*} (h : ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), C (List.ofFn f)) (l : List α) : C l :=
cast (congr_arg C l.ofFn_get) <|
h l.length l.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFnRec_ofFn {C : List α → Sort*} (h : ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), C (List.ofFn f)) {n : ℕ}
(f : Fin n → α) : @ofFnRec _ C h (List.ofFn f) = h _ f :=
equivSigmaTuple.rightInverse_symm.cast_eq (fun s => h s.1 s.2) ⟨n, f⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_tuple {P : List α → Prop} :
(∃ l : List α, P l) ↔ ∃ (n : _) (f : Fin n → α), P (List.ofFn f) :=
equivSigmaTuple.symm.surjective.exists.trans Sigma.exists
theorem forall_iff_forall_tuple {P : List α → Prop} :
(∀ l : List α, P l) ↔ ∀ (n) (f : Fin n → α), P (List.ofFn f) :=
equivSigmaTuple.symm.surjective.forall.trans Sigma.forall
/-- `Fin.sigma_eq_iff_eq_comp_cast` may be useful to work with the RHS of this expression. -/
theorem ofFn_inj' {m n : ℕ} {f : Fin m → α} {g : Fin n → α} :
ofFn f = ofFn g ↔ (⟨m, f⟩ : Σn, Fin n → α) = ⟨n, g⟩ :=
Iff.symm <| equivSigmaTuple.symm.injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- Note we can only state this when the two functions are indexed by defeq `n`. -/
theorem ofFn_injective {n : ℕ} : Function.Injective (ofFn : (Fin n → α) → List α) := fun f g h =>
eq_of_heq <| by rw [ofFn_inj'] at h; cases h; rfl
/-- A special case of `List.ofFn_inj` for when the two functions are indexed by defeq `n`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_inj {n : ℕ} {f g : Fin n → α} : ofFn f = ofFn g ↔ f = g :=
ofFn_injective.eq_iff
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/OfFn.lean | 250 | 253 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
/-- `p ∧ q` occurs frequently along the product of two filters
| iff both `p` and `q` occur frequently along the corresponding filters. -/
theorem frequently_prod_and {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 409 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
| change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 207 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Support
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.Jacobian
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
/-!
# Links between an integral and its "improper" version
In its current state, mathlib only knows how to talk about definite ("proper") integrals,
in the sense that it treats integrals over `[x, +∞)` the same as it treats integrals over
`[y, z]`. For example, the integral over `[1, +∞)` is **not** defined to be the limit of
the integral over `[1, x]` as `x` tends to `+∞`, which is known as an **improper integral**.
Indeed, the "proper" definition is stronger than the "improper" one. The usual counterexample
is `x ↦ sin(x)/x`, which has an improper integral over `[1, +∞)` but no definite integral.
Although definite integrals have better properties, they are hardly usable when it comes to
computing integrals on unbounded sets, which is much easier using limits. Thus, in this file,
we prove various ways of studying the proper integral by studying the improper one.
## Definitions
The main definition of this file is `MeasureTheory.AECover`. It is a rather technical definition
whose sole purpose is generalizing and factoring proofs. Given an index type `ι`, a countably
generated filter `l` over `ι`, and an `ι`-indexed family `φ` of subsets of a measurable space `α`
equipped with a measure `μ`, one should think of a hypothesis `hφ : MeasureTheory.AECover μ l φ` as
a sufficient condition for being able to interpret `∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x
in φ i, f x ∂μ` as `i` tends to `l`.
When using this definition with a measure restricted to a set `s`, which happens fairly often, one
should not try too hard to use a `MeasureTheory.AECover` of subsets of `s`, as it often makes proofs
more complicated than necessary. See for example the proof of
`MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto` where we use `(fun x ↦ oi x)` as a
`MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. `μ.restrict (Iic b)`, instead of using `(fun x ↦ Ioc x b)`.
## Main statements
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is a measurable
`ENNReal`-valued function, then `∫⁻ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, if `f` is measurable and
integrable on each `φ n`, and if `∫ x in φ n, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` tends to some `I : ℝ` as n tends to `l`,
then `f` is integrable
- `MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated` : if `φ` is a
`MeasureTheory.AECover μ l`, where `l` is a countably generated filter, and if `f` is measurable
and integrable (globally), then `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` tends to `∫ x, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `+∞`.
We then specialize these lemmas to various use cases involving intervals, which are frequent
in analysis. In particular,
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` is a version of FTC-2 on the interval
`(a, +∞)`, giving the formula `∫ x in (a, +∞), g' x = l - g a` if `g'` is integrable and
`g` tends to `l` at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg` gives the same result assuming that
`g'` is nonnegative instead of integrable. Its automatic integrability in this context is proved
in `MeasureTheory.integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`.
- `MeasureTheory.integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi` is a version of the change of variables formula
on semi-infinite intervals.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that a function whose
derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` has a limit at `+∞`.
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi` shows that an integrable function
whose derivative is integrable on `(a, +∞)` tends to `0` at `+∞`.
Versions of these results are also given on the intervals `(-∞, a]` and `(-∞, +∞)`, as well as
the corresponding versions of integration by parts.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section AECover
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter ι)
/-- A sequence `φ` of subsets of `α` is a `MeasureTheory.AECover` w.r.t. a measure `μ` and a filter
`l` if almost every point (w.r.t. `μ`) of `α` eventually belongs to `φ n` (w.r.t. `l`), and if
each `φ n` is measurable. This definition is a technical way to avoid duplicating a lot of
proofs. It should be thought of as a sufficient condition for being able to interpret
`∫ x, f x ∂μ` (if it exists) as the limit of `∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ` as `n` tends to `l`.
See for example `MeasureTheory.AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`,
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto` and
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
structure AECover (φ : ι → Set α) : Prop where
ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ i in l, x ∈ φ i
protected measurableSet : ∀ i, MeasurableSet <| φ i
variable {μ} {l}
namespace AECover
/-!
## Operations on `AECover`s
-/
/-- Elementwise intersection of two `AECover`s is an `AECover`. -/
theorem inter {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hψ : AECover μ l ψ) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ φ i ∩ ψ i) where
ae_eventually_mem := hψ.1.mp <| hφ.1.mono fun _ ↦ Eventually.and
measurableSet _ := (hφ.2 _).inter (hψ.2 _)
theorem superset {φ ψ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hsub : ∀ i, φ i ⊆ ψ i)
(hmeas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (ψ i)) : AECover μ l ψ :=
⟨hφ.1.mono fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono fun i hi ↦ hsub i hi, hmeas⟩
theorem mono_ac {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := ⟨hle hφ.1, hφ.2⟩
theorem mono {ν : Measure α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) :
AECover ν l φ := hφ.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
end AECover
section MetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
theorem aecover_ball {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.ball x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
theorem aecover_closedBall {x : α} {r : ι → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l atTop) :
AECover μ l (fun i ↦ Metric.closedBall x (r i)) where
measurableSet _ := Metric.isClosed_closedBall.measurableSet
ae_eventually_mem := by
filter_upwards with y
filter_upwards [hr (Ici_mem_atTop (dist x y))] with a ha using by simpa [dist_comm] using ha
end MetricSpace
section Preorderα
variable [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α}
theorem aecover_Ici (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) : AECover μ l fun i => Ici (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_le_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ici
theorem aecover_Iic (hb : Tendsto b l atTop) : AECover μ l fun i => Iic <| b i :=
aecover_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
theorem aecover_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop) :
AECover μ l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
end Preorderα
section LinearOrderα
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} (ha : Tendsto a l atBot) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := ae_of_all μ ha.eventually_lt_atBot
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Iio (b i) := aecover_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha hb
theorem aecover_Ioo [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
theorem aecover_Ioc [NoMinOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioi ha).inter (aecover_Iic hb)
theorem aecover_Ico [NoMaxOrder α] : AECover μ l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ici ha).inter (aecover_Iio hb)
end LinearOrderα
section FiniteIntervals
variable [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
{a b : ι → α} {A B : α} (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B))
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ioi (a i) where
ae_eventually_mem := (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioi).mono fun _x hx ↦ ha.eventually <|
eventually_lt_nhds hx
measurableSet _ := measurableSet_Ioi
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iio : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iio (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha in
theorem aecover_Ioi_of_Ici : AECover (μ.restrict (Ioi A)) l fun i ↦ Ici (a i) :=
(aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ici
include hb in
theorem aecover_Iio_of_Iic : AECover (μ.restrict (Iio B)) l fun i ↦ Iic (b i) :=
aecover_Ioi_of_Ici (α := αᵒᵈ) hb
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
((aecover_Ioi_of_Ioi ha).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self le_rfl).inter
((aecover_Iio_of_Iio hb).mono <| Measure.restrict_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self le_rfl)
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Icc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Icc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Icc
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ico : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ico_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ico
include ha hb in
theorem aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioo A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).superset (fun _ ↦ Ioo_subset_Ioc_self) fun _ ↦ measurableSet_Ioc
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ioc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Ico_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Ico A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Ico).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Icc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Icc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Icc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ico (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ico (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ico ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioc (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioc ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
theorem aecover_Icc_of_Ioo (ha : Tendsto a l (𝓝 A)) (hb : Tendsto b l (𝓝 B)) :
AECover (μ.restrict <| Icc A B) l fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i) :=
(aecover_Ioo_of_Ioo ha hb).mono (Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).ge
end FiniteIntervals
protected theorem AECover.restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α} :
AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ :=
hφ.mono Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp {s : Set α} {φ : ι → Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ae_eventually_mem : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ n in l, x ∈ φ n)
(measurable : ∀ n, MeasurableSet <| φ n) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l φ where
ae_eventually_mem := by rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
measurableSet := measurable
theorem AECover.inter_restrict {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : AECover (μ.restrict s) l fun i => φ i ∩ s :=
aecover_restrict_of_ae_imp hs
(hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.mono fun _i hi => ⟨hi, hxs⟩) fun i =>
(hφ.measurableSet i).inter hs
theorem AECover.ae_tendsto_indicator {β : Type*} [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => (φ i).indicator f x) l (𝓝 <| f x) :=
hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx =>
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| hx.mono fun _n hn => (indicator_of_mem hn _).symm
theorem AECover.aemeasurable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot]
{f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aemeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using
mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
theorem AECover.aestronglyMeasurable {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] [l.NeBot] {f : α → β} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ)
(hfm : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict <| φ i)) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := l.exists_seq_tendsto
have := aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff.mpr fun n : ℕ => hfm (u n)
rwa [Measure.restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem] at this
filter_upwards [hφ.ae_eventually_mem] with x hx using mem_iUnion.mpr (hu.eventually hx).exists
end AECover
theorem AECover.comp_tendsto {α ι ι' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
{l' : Filter ι'} {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {u : ι' → ι} (hu : Tendsto u l' l) :
AECover μ l' (φ ∘ u) where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun _x hx => hu.eventually hx
measurableSet i := hφ.measurableSet (u i)
section AECoverUnionInterCountable
variable {α ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
theorem AECover.biUnion_Iic_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) :
AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋃ (k) (_h : k ∈ Iic n), φ k :=
hφ.superset (fun _ ↦ subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic) fun _ ↦ .biUnion (to_countable _)
fun _ _ ↦ (hφ.2 _)
theorem AECover.biInter_Ici_aecover [Preorder ι] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) : AECover μ atTop fun n : ι => ⋂ (k) (_h : k ∈ Ici n), φ k where
ae_eventually_mem := hφ.ae_eventually_mem.mono fun x h ↦ by
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, eventually_forall_ge_atTop]
measurableSet _ := .biInter (to_countable _) fun n _ => hφ.measurableSet n
end AECoverUnionInterCountable
section Lintegral
variable {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι}
private theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ)
(hmono : Monotone φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
let F n := (φ n).indicator f
have key₁ : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ := fun n => hfm.indicator (hφ.measurableSet n)
have key₂ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Monotone fun n => F n x := ae_of_all _ fun x _i _j hij =>
indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (hmono hij) (fun x => zero_le <| f x) x
have key₃ : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f
(lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone key₁ key₂ key₃).congr fun n =>
lintegral_indicator (hφ.measurableSet n) _
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_nat {φ : ℕ → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ atTop φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto (∫⁻ x in φ ·, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) := by
have lim₁ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biInter_Ici_aecover
(fun i j hij => biInter_subset_biInter_left (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr hij)) hfm
have lim₂ := lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone_of_nat hφ.biUnion_Iic_aecover
(fun i j hij => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr hij)) hfm
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le lim₁ lim₂ (fun n ↦ ?_) fun n ↦ ?_
exacts [lintegral_mono_set (biInter_subset_of_mem left_mem_Ici),
lintegral_mono_set (subset_biUnion_of_mem right_mem_Iic)]
theorem AECover.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) :=
tendsto_of_seq_tendsto fun _u hu => (hφ.comp_tendsto hu).lintegral_tendsto_of_nat hfm
theorem AECover.lintegral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (I : ℝ≥0∞) (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm) htendsto
theorem AECover.iSup_lintegral_eq_of_countably_generated [Nonempty ι] [l.NeBot]
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) : ⨆ i : ι, ∫⁻ x in φ i, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
have := hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm
refine ciSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt
(fun i => lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl) fun w hw => ?_
exact (this.eventually_const_lt hw).exists
end Lintegral
section Integrable
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal I) : Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨hfm, (le_of_tendsto ?_ hbounded).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top⟩
exact hφ.lintegral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfm.enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| .ofReal I)) :
Integrable f μ := by
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded (max 1 (I + 1)) hfm ?_
refine htendsto.eventually (ge_mem_nhds ?_)
refine (ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (lt_max_of_lt_left zero_lt_one)).2 ?_
exact lt_max_of_lt_right (lt_add_one I)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using hbounded)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_bounded' :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto' [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ≥0) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto I hfm
(by simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] using htendsto)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_nnnorm_tendsto' :=
AECover.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_tendsto'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hφ.aestronglyMeasurable fun i => (hfi i).aestronglyMeasurable
refine hφ.integrable_of_lintegral_enorm_bounded I hfm ?_
conv at hbounded in integral _ _ =>
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x => @norm_nonneg E _ (f x))
hfm.norm.restrict]
conv at hbounded in ENNReal.ofReal _ =>
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
refine hbounded.mono fun i hi => ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal <| ne_top_of_lt <| hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp (hfi i).2]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hi
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_norm_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I' hfi hI'
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (hbounded : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ :=
hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi <| hbounded.mono fun _i hi =>
(integral_congr_ae <| ae_restrict_of_ae <| hnng.mono fun _ => Real.norm_of_nonneg).le.trans hi
theorem AECover.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (φ i) μ)
(hnng : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, 0 ≤ f x) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := htendsto.isBoundedUnder_le
hφ.integrable_of_integral_bounded_of_nonneg_ae I' hfi hnng hI'
end Integrable
section Integral
variable {α ι E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {l : Filter ι} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in φ i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
suffices h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x : α, (φ i).indicator f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x : α, f x ∂μ)) from by
convert h using 2; rw [integral_indicator (hφ.measurableSet _)]
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun x => ‖f x‖)
(Eventually.of_forall fun i => hfi.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator <| hφ.measurableSet i)
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => ae_of_all _ fun _ => norm_indicator_le_norm_self _ _) hfi.norm
(hφ.ae_tendsto_indicator f)
/-- Slight reformulation of
`MeasureTheory.AECover.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated`. -/
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated] {φ : ι → Set α}
(hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → E} (I : E) (hfi : Integrable f μ)
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi) h
theorem AECover.integral_eq_of_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae [l.NeBot] [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{φ : ι → Set α} (hφ : AECover μ l φ) {f : α → ℝ} (I : ℝ) (hnng : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfi : ∀ n, IntegrableOn f (φ n) μ) (htendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in φ n, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = I :=
have hfi' : Integrable f μ := hφ.integrable_of_integral_tendsto_of_nonneg_ae I hfi hnng htendsto
hφ.integral_eq_of_tendsto I hfi' htendsto
end Integral
section IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot l] [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : Integrable f μ := by
have hφ : AECover μ l _ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi ht
rwa [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)]
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) (b i)`,
where `a i` tends to -∞ and `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, ∞) -/
theorem integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) (b i)) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) (h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) :
Integrable f μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrable_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' hfi ha hb hI'
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l _ := aecover_Ioi ha
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioi (a i)) (μ.restrict <| Iic b) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
exact id
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc (a i) b`,
where `a i` tends to -∞, and
`∫ x in a i .. b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (-∞, b) -/
theorem integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I b : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc (a i) b) μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 I)) : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' b hfi ha hI'
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ := by
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l _ := aecover_Iic hb
have hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Iic (b i)) (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) := by
intro i
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i), inter_comm]
exact hfi i
refine hφ.integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I hfi (h.mp ?_)
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
exact id
/-- If `f` is integrable on intervals `Ioc a (b i)`,
where `b i` tends to ∞, and
`∫ x in a .. b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ` converges to `I : ℝ` along a filter `l`,
then `f` is integrable on the interval (a, ∞) -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (I a : ℝ)
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (Ioc a (b i)) μ) (hb : Tendsto b l atTop)
(h : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| I)) : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
let ⟨I', hI'⟩ := h.isBoundedUnder_le
integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded I' a hfi hb hI'
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded {I a₀ b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) (b i)) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀) (h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b₀) := by
refine (aecover_Ioc_of_Ioc ha hb).integrable_of_integral_norm_bounded I
(fun i => (hfi i).restrict) (h.mono fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict measurableSet_Ioc]
refine le_trans (setIntegral_mono_set (hfi i).norm ?_ ?_) hi <;> apply ae_of_all
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, forall_const]
· intro c hc; exact hc.1
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_left {I a₀ b : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc (a i) b) (ha : Tendsto a l <| 𝓝 a₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc (a i) b, ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a₀ b) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi ha tendsto_const_nhds h
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded_right {I a b₀ : ℝ}
(hfi : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f <| Ioc a (b i)) (hb : Tendsto b l <| 𝓝 b₀)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in l, (∫ x in Ioc a (b i), ‖f x‖) ≤ I) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b₀) :=
integrableOn_Ioc_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded hfi tendsto_const_nhds hb h
end IntegrableOfIntervalIntegral
section IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
variable {ι E : Type*} {μ : Measure ℝ} {l : Filter ι} [IsCountablyGenerated l]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {a b : ι → ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral (hfi : Integrable f μ) (ha : Tendsto a l atBot)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) : Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioc (a i) (b i)
have hφ : AECover μ l φ := aecover_Ioc ha hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot 0),
hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop 0)] with i hai hbi
exact (intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (hai.trans hbi)).symm
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic (b : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ)
(ha : Tendsto a l atBot) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a i..b, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Iic b, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Ioi (a i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Iic b) l φ := aecover_Ioi ha
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [ha.eventually (eventually_le_atBot <| b)] with i hai
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hai, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i)]
rfl
theorem intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi (a : ℝ) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ)
(hb : Tendsto b l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in a..b i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in Ioi a, f x ∂μ) := by
let φ i := Iic (b i)
have hφ : AECover (μ.restrict <| Ioi a) l φ := aecover_Iic hb
refine (hφ.integral_tendsto_of_countably_generated hfi).congr' ?_
filter_upwards [hb.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop <| a)] with i hbi
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hbi, Measure.restrict_restrict (hφ.measurableSet i),
inter_comm]
rfl
end IntegralOfIntervalIntegral
open Real
open scoped Interval
section IoiFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {a l : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `+∞`, then
the function has a limit at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
suffices CauchySeq f from cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete this
apply Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.2 (fun ε εpos ↦ ?_)
have A : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ici ↑n, ‖f' x‖ < ε := by
have L : Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ∫ x in Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖) atTop
(𝓝 (∫ x in ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ), ‖f' x‖)) := by
apply tendsto_setIntegral_of_antitone (fun n ↦ measurableSet_Ici)
· intro m n hmn
exact Ici_subset_Ici.2 (Nat.cast_le.mpr hmn)
· rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hn)⟩
have B : ⋂ (n : ℕ), Ici (n : ℝ) = ∅ := by
apply eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x ↦ ?_)
simpa only [mem_iInter, mem_Ici, not_forall, not_le] using exists_nat_gt x
simp only [B, Measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure] at L
exact (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ εpos
have B : ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, a < n := by
rcases exists_nat_gt a with ⟨n, hn⟩
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop n] with m (hm : n < m) using hn.trans (Nat.cast_lt.mpr hm)
rcases (A.and B).exists with ⟨N, hN, h'N⟩
refine ⟨N, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist (f x) (f ↑N)
= ‖f x - f N‖ := dist_eq_norm _ _
_ = ‖∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, f' t‖ := by
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hx, intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt]
· intro y hy
simp only [hx, uIcc_of_le, mem_Icc] at hy
exact hderiv _ (h'N.trans_le hy.1)
· rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono_set (Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h'N.le))
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ioc ↑N x, ‖f' t‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm fun a ↦ f' a
_ ≤ ∫ t in Ici ↑N, ‖f' t‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set
· apply IntegrableOn.mono_set f'int.norm (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 h'N)
· filter_upwards with x using norm_nonneg _
· have : Ioc (↑N) x ⊆ Ici ↑N := Ioc_subset_Ioi_self.trans Ioi_subset_Ici_self
exact this.eventuallyLE
_ < ε := hN
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(a, +∞)`, then the function tends to zero
at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Ioi a)) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Ioi a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atTop (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atTop := by exact ⟨Ioi a, Ioi_mem_atTop _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [← top_le_iff, ← volume_Ici (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← IsEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.isUniformEmbedding_coe E).isEmbedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a))
(hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
symm
apply
intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.1) le_rfl
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(a, +∞)`.
When a function has a limit at infinity `m`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `m - f a`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Ioi a)) (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 m)) :
∫ x in Ioi a, f' x = m - f a := by
refine integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- A special case of `integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Ioi_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Ioi b, deriv f x = - f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Ioi b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, zero_sub]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atTop_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn g (Ici a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine integrableOn_Ioi_of_intervalIntegral_norm_tendsto (l - g a) a (fun x => ?_) tendsto_id ?_
· exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hg.sub_const _)
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop a] with x hx
have h'x : a ≤ id x := le_of_lt hx
calc
g x - g a = ∫ y in a..id x, g' y := by
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le h'x
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le h'x]
exact intervalIntegral.integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg (hcont.mono Icc_subset_Ici_self)
(fun y hy => hderiv y hy.1) fun y hy => g'pos y hy.1
_ = ∫ y in a..id x, ‖g' y‖ := by
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le h'x]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun y hy => ?_
dsimp
rw [abs_of_nonneg]
exact g'pos _ hy.1
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le) g'pos hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont hderiv g'pos hg) hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonnegative, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonneg' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'pos : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, 0 ≤ g' x) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg' hderiv g'pos hg)
hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(a, +∞)` and continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
apply integrable_neg_iff.1
exact integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg hcont.neg (fun x hx => (hderiv x hx).neg)
(fun x hx => neg_nonneg_of_nonpos (g'neg x hx)) hg.neg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the derivative
is automatically integrable on `(a, +∞)`. Version assuming differentiability
on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : IntegrableOn g' (Ioi a) := by
refine integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos ?_ (fun x hx ↦ hderiv x hx.out.le) g'neg hg
exact (hderiv a left_mem_Ici).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg`). Version assuming differentiability on `(a, +∞)` and
continuity at `a⁺`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt g (Ici a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x) (g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0)
(hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hcont hderiv
(integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos hcont hderiv g'neg hg) hg
/-- When a function has a limit at infinity `l`, and its derivative is nonpositive, then the
integral of the derivative on `(a, +∞)` is `l - g a` (and the derivative is integrable, see
`integrable_on_Ioi_deriv_of_nonneg'`). Version assuming differentiability on `[a, +∞)`. -/
theorem integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_nonpos' (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ici a, HasDerivAt g (g' x) x)
(g'neg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, g' x ≤ 0) (hg : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 l)) : ∫ x in Ioi a, g' x = l - g a :=
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' hderiv (integrableOn_Ioi_deriv_of_nonpos' hderiv g'neg hg)
hg
end IoiFTC
section IicFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {a : ℝ} {m : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- If the derivative of a function defined on the real line is integrable close to `-∞`, then
the function has a limit at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot f)) := by
suffices ∃ a, Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 a) from tendsto_nhds_limUnder this
let g := f ∘ (fun x ↦ -x)
have hdg : ∀ x ∈ Ioi (-a), HasDerivAt g (-f' (-x)) x := by
intro x hx
have : -x ∈ Iic a := by simp only [mem_Iic, mem_Ioi, neg_le] at *; exact hx.le
simpa using HasDerivAt.scomp x (hderiv (-x) this) (hasDerivAt_neg' x)
have L : Tendsto g atTop (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi hdg
exact ((MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage (Measure.measurePreserving_neg _)
(Homeomorph.neg ℝ).measurableEmbedding).2 f'int.neg).mono_set (by simp)
refine ⟨limUnder atTop g, ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x ↦ g (-x)) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atTop g)) := L.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
simpa [g] using this
open UniformSpace in
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on `(-∞, a]`, then the function tends to zero
at `-∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x)
(f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a)) (fint : IntegrableOn f (Iic a)) :
Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) := by
let F : E →L[ℝ] Completion E := Completion.toComplL
have Fderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt (F ∘ f) (F (f' x)) x :=
fun x hx ↦ F.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt _ (hderiv x hx)
have Fint : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f) (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp fint
have F'int : IntegrableOn (F ∘ f') (Iic a) := by apply F.integrable_comp f'int
have A : Tendsto (F ∘ f) atBot (𝓝 (limUnder atBot (F ∘ f))) := by
apply tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic Fderiv F'int
have B : limUnder atBot (F ∘ f) = F 0 := by
have : IntegrableAtFilter (F ∘ f) atBot := by exact ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot _, Fint⟩
apply IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto this ?_ A
intro s hs
rcases mem_atBot_sets.1 hs with ⟨b, hb⟩
apply le_antisymm (le_top)
rw [← volume_Iic (a := b)]
exact measure_mono hb
rwa [B, ← IsEmbedding.tendsto_nhds_iff] at A
exact (Completion.isUniformEmbedding_coe E).isEmbedding
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a)` and continuity at `a⁻`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic a) a)
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iio a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
have hcont : ContinuousOn f (Iic a) := by
intro x hx
rcases hx.out.eq_or_lt with rfl|hx
· exact hcont
· exact (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic a f'int tendsto_id) ?_
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hf.const_sub _)
filter_upwards [Iic_mem_atBot a] with x hx
symm
apply intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hx
(hcont.mono Icc_subset_Iic_self) fun y hy => hderiv y hy.2
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hx]
exact f'int.mono (fun y hy => hy.2) le_rfl
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on semi-infinite intervals `(-∞, a)`.
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative on `(-∞, a)` is `f a - m`. Version assuming differentiability
on `(-∞, a]`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at minus infinity,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic`. -/
theorem integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto'
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Iic a, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (f'int : IntegrableOn f' (Iic a))
(hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) : ∫ x in Iic a, f' x = f a - m := by
refine integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto ?_ (fun x hx => hderiv x hx.out.le)
f'int hf
exact (hderiv a right_mem_Iic).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-- A special case of `integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto` where we assume that `f` is C^1 with
compact support. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.integral_Iic_deriv_eq (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f)
(h2f : HasCompactSupport f) (b : ℝ) : ∫ x in Iic b, deriv f x = f b := by
have := fun x (_ : x ∈ Iio b) ↦ hf.differentiable le_rfl x |>.hasDerivAt
rw [integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hf.continuous.continuousWithinAt this, sub_zero]
· refine hf.continuous_deriv le_rfl |>.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport h2f.deriv |>.integrableOn
rw [hasCompactSupport_iff_eventuallyEq, Filter.coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at h2f
exact h2f.filter_mono _root_.atBot_le_cocompact |>.tendsto
open UniformSpace in
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
{f : ℝ → F} (hf : ContDiff ℝ 1 f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) (x : ℝ) :
‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ∫⁻ y in Iic x, ‖deriv f y‖ₑ := by
let I : F →L[ℝ] Completion F := Completion.toComplL
let f' : ℝ → Completion F := I ∘ f
have hf' : ContDiff ℝ 1 f' := hf.continuousLinearMap_comp I
have h'f' : HasCompactSupport f' := h'f.comp_left rfl
have : ‖f' x‖ₑ ≤ ∫⁻ y in Iic x, ‖deriv f' y‖ₑ := by
rw [← HasCompactSupport.integral_Iic_deriv_eq hf' h'f' x]
exact enorm_integral_le_lintegral_enorm _
convert this with y
· simp [f', I, Completion.enorm_coe]
· rw [fderiv_comp_deriv _ I.differentiableAt (hf.differentiable le_rfl _)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.fderiv]
simp [I]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.ennnorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv :=
HasCompactSupport.enorm_le_lintegral_Ici_deriv
end IicFTC
section UnivFTC
variable {E : Type*} {f f' : ℝ → E} {m n : E} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- **Fundamental theorem of calculus-2**, on the whole real line
When a function has a limit `m` at `-∞` and `n` at `+∞`, and its derivative is integrable, then the
integral of the derivative is `n - m`.
Note that such a function always has a limit at `-∞` and `+∞`,
see `tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic` and
`tendsto_limUnder_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi`. -/
theorem integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto [CompleteSpace E]
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f')
(hbot : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 m)) (htop : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 n)) : ∫ x, f' x = n - m := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, ← Set.Iic_union_Ioi (a := 0),
setIntegral_union (Iic_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl) measurableSet_Ioi hf'.integrableOn hf'.integrableOn,
integral_Iic_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn hbot,
integral_Ioi_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto' (fun x _ ↦ hderiv x) hf'.integrableOn htop]
abel
/-- If a function and its derivative are integrable on the real line, then the integral of the
derivative is zero. -/
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrable
(hderiv : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) (hf' : Integrable f') (hf : Integrable f) :
∫ x, f' x = 0 := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE]
have A : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Iic (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
have B : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_of_hasDerivAt_of_integrableOn_Ioi (a := 0) (fun x _hx ↦ hderiv x)
hf'.integrableOn hf.integrableOn
simpa using integral_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto hderiv hf' A B
end UnivFTC
section IoiChangeVariables
open Real
open scoped Interval
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of vector-valued functions, proved by taking
limits from the result for finite intervals. -/
theorem integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → E} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have eq : ∀ b : ℝ, a < b → (∫ x in a..b, f' x • (g ∘ f) x) = ∫ u in f a..f b, g u := fun b hb ↦ by
have i1 : Ioo (min a b) (max a b) ⊆ Ioi a := by
rw [min_eq_left hb.le]
exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
have i2 : [[a, b]] ⊆ Ici a := by rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
refine
intervalIntegral.integral_comp_smul_deriv''' (hf.mono i2)
(fun x hx => hff' x <| mem_of_mem_of_subset hx i1) (hg_cont.mono <| image_subset _ ?_)
(hg1.mono_set <| image_subset _ ?_) (hg2.mono_set i2)
· rw [min_eq_left hb.le]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
· rw [uIcc_of_le hb.le]; exact Icc_subset_Ici_self
rw [integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi] at hg2
have t2 := intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ hg2 tendsto_id
have : Ioi (f a) ⊆ f '' Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <|
IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici isPreconnected_Ici left_mem_Ici
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| Ici_mem_atTop _) hf hft
have t1 := (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi _ (hg1.mono_set this) tendsto_id).comp hft
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (Tendsto.congr' (eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop a) eq) t2) t1
/-- Change-of-variables formula for `Ioi` integrals of scalar-valued functions -/
theorem integral_comp_mul_deriv_Ioi {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {g : ℝ → ℝ} {a : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| Ici a) (hft : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioi a, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ioi x) x)
(hg_cont : ContinuousOn g <| f '' Ioi a) (hg1 : IntegrableOn g <| f '' Ici a)
(hg2 : IntegrableOn (fun x => (g ∘ f) x * f' x) (Ici a)) :
(∫ x in Ioi a, (g ∘ f) x * f' x) = ∫ u in Ioi (f a), g u := by
have hg2' : IntegrableOn (fun x => f' x • (g ∘ f) x) (Ici a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hg2
| simpa [mul_comm] using integral_comp_smul_deriv_Ioi hf hft hff' hg_cont hg1 hg2'
/-- Substitution `y = x ^ p` in integrals over `Ioi 0` -/
theorem integral_comp_rpow_Ioi (g : ℝ → E) {p : ℝ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in Ioi 0, (|p| * x ^ (p - 1)) • g (x ^ p)) = ∫ y in Ioi 0, g y := by
let S := Ioi (0 : ℝ)
have a1 : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ S → HasDerivWithinAt (fun t : ℝ => t ^ p) (p * x ^ (p - 1)) S x :=
fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_rpow_const (Or.inl (mem_Ioi.mp hx).ne')).hasDerivWithinAt
have a2 : InjOn (fun x : ℝ => x ^ p) S := by
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hp with (h | h)
· apply StrictAntiOn.injOn
intro x hx y hy hxy
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegralEqImproper.lean | 1,068 | 1,079 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Minimal polynomials
This file defines the minimal polynomial of an element `x` of an `A`-algebra `B`,
under the assumption that x is integral over `A`, and derives some basic properties
such as irreducibility under the assumption `B` is a domain.
-/
open Polynomial Set Function
variable {A B B' : Type*}
section MinPolyDef
variable (A) [CommRing A] [Ring B] [Algebra A B]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Suppose `x : B`, where `B` is an `A`-algebra.
The minimal polynomial `minpoly A x` of `x`
is a monic polynomial with coefficients in `A` of smallest degree that has `x` as its root,
if such exists (`IsIntegral A x`) or zero otherwise.
For example, if `V` is a `𝕜`-vector space for some field `𝕜` and `f : V →ₗ[𝕜] V` then
the minimal polynomial of `f` is `minpoly 𝕜 f`.
-/
@[stacks 09GM]
noncomputable def minpoly (x : B) : A[X] :=
if hx : IsIntegral A x then degree_lt_wf.min _ hx else 0
end MinPolyDef
namespace minpoly
section Ring
variable [CommRing A] [Ring B] [Ring B'] [Algebra A B] [Algebra A B']
variable {x : B}
/-- A minimal polynomial is monic. -/
theorem monic (hx : IsIntegral A x) : Monic (minpoly A x) := by
delta minpoly
rw [dif_pos hx]
exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).1
/-- A minimal polynomial is nonzero. -/
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial A] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x ≠ 0 :=
(monic hx).ne_zero
theorem eq_zero (hx : ¬IsIntegral A x) : minpoly A x = 0 :=
dif_neg hx
theorem ne_zero_iff [Nontrivial A] : minpoly A x ≠ 0 ↔ IsIntegral A x :=
⟨fun h => of_not_not <| eq_zero.mt h, ne_zero⟩
theorem algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : B) :
minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x := by
classical
simp_rw [minpoly, isIntegral_algHom_iff _ hf, ← Polynomial.aeval_def, aeval_algHom,
AlgHom.comp_apply, _root_.map_eq_zero_iff f hf]
theorem algebraMap_eq {B} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra B B'] [IsScalarTower A B B']
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B B')) (x : B) :
minpoly A (algebraMap B B' x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B B') h x
@[simp]
theorem algEquiv_eq (f : B ≃ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : minpoly A (f x) = minpoly A x :=
algHom_eq (f : B →ₐ[A] B') f.injective x
variable (A x)
/-- An element is a root of its minimal polynomial. -/
@[simp]
theorem aeval : aeval x (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
delta minpoly
split_ifs with hx
· exact (degree_lt_wf.min_mem _ hx).2
· exact aeval_zero _
/-- Given any `f : B →ₐ[A] B'` and any `x : L`, the minimal polynomial of `x` vanishes at `f x`. -/
@[simp]
theorem aeval_algHom (f : B →ₐ[A] B') (x : B) : (Polynomial.aeval (f x)) (minpoly A x) = 0 := by
rw [Polynomial.aeval_algHom, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval, map_zero]
/-- A minimal polynomial is not `1`. -/
theorem ne_one [Nontrivial B] : minpoly A x ≠ 1 := by
intro h
refine (one_ne_zero : (1 : B) ≠ 0) ?_
simpa using congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) h
theorem map_ne_one [Nontrivial B] {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] (f : A →+* R) :
(minpoly A x).map f ≠ 1 := by
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· exact mt ((monic hx).eq_one_of_map_eq_one f) (ne_one A x)
· rw [eq_zero hx, Polynomial.map_zero]
exact zero_ne_one
/-- A minimal polynomial is not a unit. -/
theorem not_isUnit [Nontrivial B] : ¬IsUnit (minpoly A x) := by
haveI : Nontrivial A := (algebraMap A B).domain_nontrivial
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· exact mt (monic hx).eq_one_of_isUnit (ne_one A x)
· rw [eq_zero hx]
exact not_isUnit_zero
theorem mem_range_of_degree_eq_one (hx : (minpoly A x).degree = 1) :
x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
have h : IsIntegral A x := by
by_contra h
rw [eq_zero h, degree_zero, ← WithBot.coe_one] at hx
exact ne_of_lt (show ⊥ < ↑1 from WithBot.bot_lt_coe 1) hx
have key := minpoly.aeval A x
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hx, (minpoly.monic h).leadingCoeff, C_1, one_mul, aeval_add,
aeval_C, aeval_X, ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_neg] at key
exact ⟨-(minpoly A x).coeff 0, key.symm⟩
/-- The defining property of the minimal polynomial of an element `x`:
it is the monic polynomial with smallest degree that has `x` as its root. -/
theorem min {p : A[X]} (pmonic : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p := by
delta minpoly; split_ifs with hx
· exact le_of_not_lt (degree_lt_wf.not_lt_min _ hx ⟨pmonic, hp⟩)
· simp only [degree_zero, bot_le]
theorem unique' {p : A[X]} (hm : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(hl : ∀ q : A[X], degree q < degree p → q = 0 ∨ Polynomial.aeval x q ≠ 0) :
p = minpoly A x := by
nontriviality A
have hx : IsIntegral A x := ⟨p, hm, hp⟩
obtain h | h := hl _ ((minpoly A x).degree_modByMonic_lt hm)
swap
· exact (h <| (aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root hm hp).trans <| aeval A x).elim
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hm).1 h
rw [hr]
have hlead := congr_arg leadingCoeff hr
rw [mul_comm, leadingCoeff_mul_monic hm, (monic hx).leadingCoeff] at hlead
have : natDegree r ≤ 0 := by
have hr0 : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact ne_zero hx (mul_zero p ▸ hr)
apply_fun natDegree at hr
rw [hm.natDegree_mul' hr0] at hr
apply Nat.le_of_add_le_add_left
rw [add_zero]
exact hr.symm.trans_le (natDegree_le_natDegree <| min A x hm hp)
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero this, ← Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero this, ← leadingCoeff, ← hlead, C_1,
mul_one]
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton [Subsingleton B] : minpoly A x = 1 := by
nontriviality A
have := minpoly.min A x monic_one (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
rw [degree_one] at this
rcases le_or_lt (minpoly A x).degree 0 with h | h
· rwa [(monic ⟨1, monic_one, by simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]⟩ :
(minpoly A x).Monic).degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one] at h
· exact (this.not_lt h).elim
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing A]
section Ring
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B]
variable {x : B}
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial, as a natural number, is positive. -/
theorem natDegree_pos [Nontrivial B] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : 0 < natDegree (minpoly A x) := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero]
intro ndeg_eq_zero
have eq_one : minpoly A x = 1 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero ndeg_eq_zero]
convert C_1 (R := A)
simpa only [ndeg_eq_zero.symm] using (monic hx).leadingCoeff
simpa only [eq_one, map_one, one_ne_zero] using aeval A x
/-- The degree of a minimal polynomial is positive. -/
theorem degree_pos [Nontrivial B] (hx : IsIntegral A x) : 0 < degree (minpoly A x) :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos hx)
section
variable [Nontrivial B]
open Polynomial in
theorem degree_eq_one_iff : (minpoly A x).degree = 1 ↔ x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
refine ⟨minpoly.mem_range_of_degree_eq_one _ _, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
haveI := Module.nontrivial A B
exact (degree_X_sub_C x ▸ minpoly.min A (algebraMap A B x) (monic_X_sub_C x) (by simp)).antisymm
(Nat.WithBot.add_one_le_of_lt <| minpoly.degree_pos isIntegral_algebraMap)
theorem natDegree_eq_one_iff :
(minpoly A x).natDegree = 1 ↔ x ∈ (algebraMap A B).range := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one]
exact degree_eq_one_iff
theorem two_le_natDegree_iff (int : IsIntegral A x) :
2 ≤ (minpoly A x).natDegree ↔ x ∉ (algebraMap A B).range := by
rw [iff_not_comm, ← natDegree_eq_one_iff, not_le]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.trans_lt one_lt_two, fun h ↦ by linarith only [minpoly.natDegree_pos int, h]⟩
theorem two_le_natDegree_subalgebra {B} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Nontrivial B]
{S : Subalgebra A B} {x : B} (int : IsIntegral S x) : 2 ≤ (minpoly S x).natDegree ↔ x ∉ S := by
rw [two_le_natDegree_iff int, Iff.not]
| apply Set.ext_iff.mp Subtype.range_val_subtype
end
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Basic.lean | 218 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases x with
| top => exact (h'x rfl).elim
| coe x =>
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
induction x using recTopCoe
· rcases hy.eq_or_lt with rfl|hy
· rw [rpow_zero, one_mul, zero_add]
rcases hz.eq_or_lt with rfl|hz
· rw [rpow_zero, mul_one, add_zero]
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, hy, hz, add_pos hy hz]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hy, hz, add_nonneg hy hz, NNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg _ hy hz]
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· have : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, h, this, NNReal.rpow_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases x
· cases n <;> simp [top_rpow_of_pos (Nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (Nat.cast_nonneg n)]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow_eq_ite (x y : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = if (x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0) ∧ z < 0 then ⊤ else x ^ z * y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · simp
replace hz := hz.lt_or_lt
wlog hxy : x ≤ y
· convert this y x z hz (le_of_not_le hxy) using 2 <;> simp only [mul_comm, and_comm, or_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx0)
· induction y <;> rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*, hz.not_lt]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy0)
· exact (hx0 (bot_unique hxy)).elim
induction x
· rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [hz, top_unique hxy]
induction y
· rw [ne_eq, coe_eq_zero] at hx0
rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*]
simp only [*, if_false]
norm_cast at *
rw [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero hx0 hy0), NNReal.mul_rpow]
norm_cast
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z * (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z :=
mul_rpow_of_ne_top coe_ne_top coe_ne_top z
theorem prod_coe_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r = ((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← coe_mul_rpow, coe_mul]
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
simp [hz.not_lt, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem prod_rpow_of_ne_top {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi ih =>
have h2f : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞ := fun i hi ↦ hf i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi
rw [prod_insert hi, prod_insert hi, ih h2f, ← mul_rpow_of_ne_top <| hf i <| mem_insert_self ..]
apply prod_ne_top h2f
theorem prod_rpow_of_nonneg {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hr]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy); · simp only [rpow_zero, inv_one]
replace hy := hy.lt_or_lt
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0); · cases hy <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne x ⊤ with (rfl | h_top); · cases hy <;> simp [*]
apply ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
rw [← mul_rpow_of_ne_zero (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 h_top) h0, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 h_top,
one_rpow]
theorem div_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hz, inv_rpow, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ z := by
intro x y hxy
lift x to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hxy
rcases eq_or_ne y ∞ with (rfl | hy)
· simp only [top_rpow_of_pos h, ← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h.le, coe_lt_top]
· lift y to ℝ≥0 using hy
simp only [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ h.le, NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow (coe_lt_coe.1 hxy) h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_apply (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]
rfl
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
monotone_rpow_of_nonneg h₂ h₁
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
strictMono_rpow_of_pos h₂ h₁
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hz).le_iff_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
| (strictMono_rpow_of_pos hz).lt_iff_lt
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← rpow_one x]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 743 | 746 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
/-! # Germs of functions between topological spaces
In this file, we prove basic properties of germs of functions between topological spaces,
with respect to the neighbourhood filter `𝓝 x`.
## Main definitions and results
* `Filter.Germ.value φ f`: value associated to the germ `φ` at a point `x`, w.r.t. the
neighbourhood filter at `x`. This is the common value of all representatives of `φ` at `x`.
* `Filter.Germ.valueOrderRingHom` and friends: the map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` is a
monoid homomorphism, 𝕜-linear map, ring homomorphism, monotone ring homomorphism
* `RestrictGermPredicate`: given a predicate on germs `P : Π x : X, germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop` and
`A : set X`, build a new predicate on germs `restrictGermPredicate P A` such that
`(∀ x, RestrictGermPredicate P A x f) ↔ ∀ᶠ x near A, P x f`;
`forall_restrictRermPredicate_iff` is this equivalence.
* `Filter.Germ.sliceLeft, sliceRight`: map the germ of functions `X × Y → Z` at `p = (x,y) ∈ X × Y`
to the corresponding germ of functions `X → Z` at `x ∈ X` resp. `Y → Z` at `y ∈ Y`.
* `eq_of_germ_isConstant`: if each germ of `f : X → Y` is constant and `X` is pre-connected,
`f` is constant.
-/
open scoped Topology
open Filter Set
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f g : X → Y} {A : Set X} {x : X}
namespace Filter.Germ
/-- The value associated to a germ at a point. This is the common value
shared by all representatives at the given point. -/
def value {X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {x : X} (φ : Germ (𝓝 x) α) : α :=
Quotient.liftOn' φ (fun f ↦ f x) fun f g h ↦ by dsimp only; rw [Eventually.self_of_nhds h]
theorem value_smul {α β : Type*} [SMul α β] (φ : Germ (𝓝 x) α)
(ψ : Germ (𝓝 x) β) : (φ • ψ).value = φ.value • ψ.value :=
Germ.inductionOn φ fun _ ↦ Germ.inductionOn ψ fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` into a monoid `E` as a monoid homomorphism -/
@[to_additive "The map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` as an additive monoid homomorphism"]
def valueMulHom {X E : Type*} [Monoid E] [TopologicalSpace X] {x : X} : Germ (𝓝 x) E →* E where
toFun := Filter.Germ.value
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' φ ψ := Germ.inductionOn φ fun _ ↦ Germ.inductionOn ψ fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` into a `𝕜`-module `E` as a `𝕜`-linear map -/
def valueₗ {X 𝕜 E : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace X]
{x : X} : Germ (𝓝 x) E →ₗ[𝕜] E where
__ := Filter.Germ.valueAddHom
map_smul' := fun _ φ ↦ Germ.inductionOn φ fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` as a ring homomorphism -/
def valueRingHom {X E : Type*} [Semiring E] [TopologicalSpace X] {x : X} : Germ (𝓝 x) E →+* E :=
{ Filter.Germ.valueMulHom, Filter.Germ.valueAddHom with }
/-- The map `Germ (𝓝 x) E → E` as a monotone ring homomorphism -/
def valueOrderRingHom {X E : Type*} [Semiring E] [PartialOrder E] [TopologicalSpace X] {x : X} :
Germ (𝓝 x) E →+*o E where
__ := Filter.Germ.valueRingHom
monotone' := fun φ ψ ↦
Germ.inductionOn φ fun _ ↦ Germ.inductionOn ψ fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhds
end Filter.Germ
section RestrictGermPredicate
/-- Given a predicate on germs `P : Π x : X, germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop` and `A : set X`,
build a new predicate on germs `RestrictGermPredicate P A` such that
`(∀ x, RestrictGermPredicate P A x f) ↔ ∀ᶠ x near A, P x f`, see
`forall_restrictGermPredicate_iff` for this equivalence. -/
def RestrictGermPredicate (P : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop)
(A : Set X) : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop := fun x φ ↦
Germ.liftOn φ (fun f ↦ x ∈ A → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, P y f)
haveI : ∀ f f' : X → Y, f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f' → (∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, P y f) → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, P y f' := by
intro f f' hff' hf
apply (hf.and <| Eventually.eventually_nhds hff').mono
rintro y ⟨hy, hy'⟩
rwa [Germ.coe_eq.mpr (EventuallyEq.symm hy')]
fun f f' hff' ↦ propext <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ ⟨this f f' hff', this f' f hff'.symm⟩
theorem Filter.Eventually.germ_congr_set
{P : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop} (hf : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ A, P x f)
(h : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝ˢ A, g z = f z) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ A, P x g := by
rw [eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall] at *
intro x hx
apply ((hf x hx).and (h x hx).eventually_nhds).mono
intro y hy
convert hy.1 using 1
exact Germ.coe_eq.mpr hy.2
theorem restrictGermPredicate_congr {P : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop}
(hf : RestrictGermPredicate P A x f) (h : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝ˢ A, g z = f z) :
RestrictGermPredicate P A x g := by
intro hx
apply ((hf hx).and <| (eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mp h x hx).eventually_nhds).mono
rintro y ⟨hy, h'y⟩
rwa [Germ.coe_eq.mpr h'y]
theorem forall_restrictGermPredicate_iff {P : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop} :
(∀ x, RestrictGermPredicate P A x f) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ A, P x f := by
rw [eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall]
rfl
theorem forall_restrictGermPredicate_of_forall
{P : ∀ x : X, Germ (𝓝 x) Y → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x f) :
∀ x, RestrictGermPredicate P A x f :=
forall_restrictGermPredicate_iff.mpr (Eventually.of_forall h)
end RestrictGermPredicate
namespace Filter.Germ
/-- Map the germ of functions `X × Y → Z` at `p = (x,y) ∈ X × Y` to the corresponding germ
of functions `X → Z` at `x ∈ X` -/
def sliceLeft [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X × Y} (P : Germ (𝓝 p) Z) : Germ (𝓝 p.1) Z :=
P.compTendsto (Prod.mk · p.2) (Continuous.prodMk_left p.2).continuousAt
@[simp]
theorem sliceLeft_coe [TopologicalSpace Y] {y : Y} (f : X × Y → Z) :
(↑f : Germ (𝓝 (x, y)) Z).sliceLeft = fun x' ↦ f (x', y) :=
rfl
/-- Map the germ of functions `X × Y → Z` at `p = (x,y) ∈ X × Y` to the corresponding germ
of functions `Y → Z` at `y ∈ Y` -/
def sliceRight [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X × Y} (P : Germ (𝓝 p) Z) : Germ (𝓝 p.2) Z :=
P.compTendsto (Prod.mk p.1) (Continuous.prodMk_right p.1).continuousAt
@[simp]
theorem sliceRight_coe [TopologicalSpace Y] {y : Y} (f : X × Y → Z) :
(↑f : Germ (𝓝 (x, y)) Z).sliceRight = fun y' ↦ f (x, y') :=
rfl
lemma isConstant_comp_subtype {s : Set X} {f : X → Y} {x : s}
(hf : (f : Germ (𝓝 (x : X)) Y).IsConstant) :
((f ∘ Subtype.val : s → Y) : Germ (𝓝 x) Y).IsConstant :=
isConstant_comp_tendsto hf continuousAt_subtype_val
end Filter.Germ
/-- If the germ of `f` w.r.t. each `𝓝 x` is constant, `f` is locally constant. -/
lemma IsLocallyConstant.of_germ_isConstant (h : ∀ x : X, (f : Germ (𝓝 x) Y).IsConstant) :
IsLocallyConstant f := by
intro s
rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a
apply mem_of_superset hb
intro x hx
have : f x = f a := (mem_of_mem_nhds hb) ▸ hx
rw [mem_preimage, this]
exact ha
theorem eq_of_germ_isConstant [i : PreconnectedSpace X]
(h : ∀ x : X, (f : Germ (𝓝 x) Y).IsConstant) (x x' : X) : f x = f x' :=
(IsLocallyConstant.of_germ_isConstant h).apply_eq_of_isPreconnected
| (preconnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp i) (by trivial) (by trivial)
lemma eq_of_germ_isConstant_on {s : Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, (f : Germ (𝓝 x) Y).IsConstant)
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {x' : X} (x_in : x ∈ s) (x'_in : x' ∈ s) : f x = f x' := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Germ.lean | 164 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
/-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homFamily_arrow_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
P.homFamily ⟨Arrow.mk f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow.mk f ∈ P.toSet ↔ P f := Iff.rfl
lemma of_eq {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : P f)
{X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
(hX : X = X') (hY : Y = Y') (h : f' = eqToHom hX.symm ≫ f ≫ eqToHom hY) :
P f' := by
rw [← P.arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff] at hf ⊢
rwa [(Arrow.mk_eq_mk_iff f' f).2 ⟨hX.symm, hY.symm, h⟩]
end
/-- The class of morphisms given by a family of morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ Y i`. -/
inductive ofHoms {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) : MorphismProperty C
| mk (i : ι) : ofHoms f (f i)
lemma ofHoms_iff {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) {A B : C} (g : A ⟶ B) :
ofHoms f g ↔ ∃ i, Arrow.mk g = Arrow.mk (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i⟩
| exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, h⟩
rw [← (ofHoms f).arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff, h, arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff]
constructor
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_homFamily (P : MorphismProperty C) : ofHoms P.homFamily = P := by
ext _ _ f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [ofHoms_iff] at hf
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 158 | 168 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file gives lemmas about semirings, rings and domains.
This is analogous to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic`,
the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
For the definitions of semirings and rings see `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs`.
-/
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
open Function
namespace SemiconjBy
@[simp]
theorem add_right [Distrib R] {a x y x' y' : R} (h : SemiconjBy a x y) (h' : SemiconjBy a x' y') :
SemiconjBy a (x + x') (y + y') := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, left_distrib, right_distrib, h.eq, h'.eq]
@[simp]
theorem add_left [Distrib R] {a b x y : R} (ha : SemiconjBy a x y) (hb : SemiconjBy b x y) :
SemiconjBy (a + b) x y := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, left_distrib, right_distrib, ha.eq, hb.eq]
section
variable [Mul R] [HasDistribNeg R] {a x y : R}
theorem neg_right (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy a (-x) (-y) := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, h.eq, neg_mul, mul_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neg_right_iff : SemiconjBy a (-x) (-y) ↔ SemiconjBy a x y :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg x ▸ neg_neg y ▸ h.neg_right, SemiconjBy.neg_right⟩
theorem neg_left (h : SemiconjBy a x y) : SemiconjBy (-a) x y := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, h.eq, neg_mul, mul_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neg_left_iff : SemiconjBy (-a) x y ↔ SemiconjBy a x y :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg a ▸ h.neg_left, SemiconjBy.neg_left⟩
end
section
variable [MulOneClass R] [HasDistribNeg R]
theorem neg_one_right (a : R) : SemiconjBy a (-1) (-1) := by simp
theorem neg_one_left (x : R) : SemiconjBy (-1) x x := by simp
end
section
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b x y x' y' : R}
@[simp]
theorem sub_right (h : SemiconjBy a x y) (h' : SemiconjBy a x' y') :
SemiconjBy a (x - x') (y - y') := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_right h'.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem sub_left (ha : SemiconjBy a x y) (hb : SemiconjBy b x y) :
SemiconjBy (a - b) x y := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using ha.add_left hb.neg_left
end
end SemiconjBy
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Semiconj.lean | 95 | 97 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of compositions of functions
In this file we prove the chain rule for the following cases:
* `HasDerivAt.comp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → 𝕜'` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasDerivAt.scomp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → E` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt` etc: `f : E → F` composed with `g : 𝕜 → E`;
Here `𝕜` is the base normed field, `E` and `F` are normed spaces over `𝕜` and `𝕜'` is an algebra
over `𝕜` (e.g., `𝕜'=𝕜` or `𝕜=ℝ`, `𝕜'=ℂ`).
We also give versions with the `of_eq` suffix, which require an equality proof instead
of definitional equality of the different points used in the composition. These versions are
often more flexible to use.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`analysis/calculus/deriv/basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, chain rule
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s : Set 𝕜}
variable {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
| simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 74 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 733 | 745 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
/-!
# N-ary images of sets
This file defines `Set.image2`, the binary image of sets.
This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations and `Set.seq`.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Finset.NAry`, to `Order.Filter.NAry`, and to
`Data.Option.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ}
variable {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} {u : Set γ} {v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem mem_image2_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a', ha', b', hb', h⟩
rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩, fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
/-- image2 is monotone with respect to `⊆`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb)
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s t' :=
image2_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t :=
image2_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image2_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ ha => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image2_right (ha : a ∈ s) : f a '' t ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ => mem_image2_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
lemma exists_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image2_iff := forall_mem_image2
@[simp]
theorem image2_subset_iff {u : Set γ} : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image2
theorem image2_subset_iff_left : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (fun b => f a b) '' t ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage]
theorem image2_subset_iff_right : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage, @forall₂_swap α]
variable (f)
@[simp]
lemma image_prod : (fun x : α × β ↦ f x.1 x.2) '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
ext fun _ ↦ by simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] lemma image_uncurry_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : uncurry f '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
image_prod _
@[simp] lemma image2_mk_eq_prod : image2 Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := ext <| by simp
@[simp]
lemma image2_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 (fun a b ↦ f (a, b)) s t = f '' s ×ˢ t := by
simp [← image_uncurry_prod, uncurry]
theorem image2_swap (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => f b a) t s := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨b, hb, a, ha, rfl⟩
variable {f}
theorem image2_union_left : image2 f (s ∪ s') t = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_prod, union_prod, image_union]
theorem image2_union_right : image2 f s (t ∪ t') = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s t' := by
rw [← image2_swap, image2_union_left, image2_swap f, image2_swap f]
lemma image2_inter_left (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f (s ∩ s') t = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, inter_prod, image_inter hf.uncurry]
lemma image2_inter_right (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f s (t ∩ t') = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, prod_inter, image_inter hf.uncurry]
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_left : image2 f ∅ t = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_right : image2 f s ∅ = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
theorem Nonempty.image2 : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (image2 f s t).Nonempty :=
fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ⟨_, hb⟩ => ⟨_, mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem image2_nonempty_iff : (image2 f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_, a, ha, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, b, hb⟩, fun h => h.1.image2 h.2⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_left (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_right (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image2_eq_empty_iff : image2 f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image2_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
simp [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem Subsingleton.image2 (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) (f : α → β → γ) :
(image2 f s t).Subsingleton := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply (hs.prod ht).image
theorem image2_inter_subset_left : image2 f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_right) s s'
theorem image2_inter_subset_right : image2 f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_left) t t'
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_left : image2 f {a} t = f a '' t :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_right : image2 f s {b} = (fun a => f a b) '' s :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image2_singleton : image2 f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_left : image2 f (insert a s) t = (fun b => f a b) '' t ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_left, image2_singleton_left]
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_right : image2 f s (insert b t) = (fun a => f a b) '' s ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_right, image2_singleton_right]
@[congr]
theorem image2_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨a, ha, b, hb, by rw [h a ha b hb]⟩
/-- A common special case of `image2_congr` -/
theorem image2_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t :=
image2_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
theorem image_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
g '' image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t := by
simp only [← image_prod, image_image]
theorem image2_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image2 f (g '' s) t = image2 (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t := by
ext; simp
theorem image2_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image2 f s (g '' t) = image2 (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_left (h : t.Nonempty) : image2 (fun x _ => x) s t = s := by
simp [nonempty_def.mp h, Set.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem image2_right (h : s.Nonempty) : image2 (fun _ y => y) s t = t := by
simp [nonempty_def.mp h, Set.ext_iff]
lemma image2_range (f : α' → β' → γ) (g : α → α') (h : β → β') :
image2 f (range g) (range h) = range fun x : α × β ↦ f (g x.1) (h x.2) := by
simp_rw [← image_univ, image2_image_left, image2_image_right, ← image_prod, univ_prod_univ]
theorem image2_assoc {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε} {g' : β → γ → ε'}
(h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u = image2 f' s (image2 g' t u) :=
eq_of_forall_subset_iff fun _ ↦ by simp only [image2_subset_iff, forall_mem_image2, h_assoc]
theorem image2_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : image2 f s t = image2 g t s :=
(image2_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
theorem image2_left_comm {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ} {f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
image2 f s (image2 g t u) = image2 g' t (image2 f' s u) := by
rw [image2_swap f', image2_swap f]
exact image2_assoc fun _ _ _ => h_left_comm _ _ _
theorem image2_right_comm {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : δ' → β → ε}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f' a c) b) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u = image2 g' (image2 f' s u) t := by
rw [image2_swap g, image2_swap g']
exact image2_assoc fun _ _ _ => h_right_comm _ _ _
theorem image2_image2_image2_comm {f : ε → ζ → ν} {g : α → β → ε} {h : γ → δ → ζ} {f' : ε' → ζ' → ν}
{g' : α → γ → ε'} {h' : β → δ → ζ'}
(h_comm : ∀ a b c d, f (g a b) (h c d) = f' (g' a c) (h' b d)) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) (image2 h u v) = image2 f' (image2 g' s u) (image2 h' t v) := by
ext; constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, _, ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, c, hc, rfl⟩, _, ⟨b, hb, d, hd, rfl⟩, (h_comm _ _ _ _).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, c, hc, rfl⟩, _, ⟨b, hb, d, hd, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, _, ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩, h_comm _ _ _ _⟩
theorem image_image2_distrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β' → δ} {g₁ : α → α'} {g₂ : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ a) (g₂ b)) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' (s.image g₁) (t.image g₂) := by
simp_rw [image_image2, image2_image_left, image2_image_right, h_distrib]
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image2_image_left_comm`. -/
theorem image_image2_distrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' a) b) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' (s.image g') t :=
(image_image2_distrib h_distrib).trans <| by rw [image_id']
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_right_comm`. -/
theorem image_image2_distrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : α → β' → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' a (g' b)) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' s (t.image g') :=
(image_image2_distrib h_distrib).trans <| by rw [image_id']
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_distrib_left`. -/
theorem image2_image_left_comm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' a b)) :
image2 f (s.image g) t = (image2 f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image2_distrib_left fun a b => (h_left_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_distrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image2_right_comm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' a b)) :
image2 f s (t.image g) = (image2 f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image2_distrib_right fun a b => (h_right_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `s`-`s` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image2_distrib_subset_left {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ} {f₁ : α → β → β'}
{f₂ : α → γ → γ'} {g' : β' → γ' → ε} (h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' (f₁ a b) (f₂ a c)) :
image2 f s (image2 g t u) ⊆ image2 g' (image2 f₁ s t) (image2 f₂ s u) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h_distrib]
exact mem_image2_of_mem (mem_image2_of_mem ha hb) (mem_image2_of_mem ha hc)
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `u`-`u` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image2_distrib_subset_right {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f₁ : α → γ → α'}
{f₂ : β → γ → β'} {g' : α' → β' → ε} (h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f₁ a c) (f₂ b c)) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u ⊆ image2 g' (image2 f₁ s u) (image2 f₂ t u) := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, c, hc, rfl⟩
rw [h_distrib]
exact mem_image2_of_mem (mem_image2_of_mem ha hc) (mem_image2_of_mem hb hc)
theorem image_image2_antidistrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α' → δ} {g₁ : β → β'} {g₂ : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ b) (g₂ a)) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' (t.image g₁) (s.image g₂) := by
rw [image2_swap f]
exact image_image2_distrib fun _ _ => h_antidistrib _ _
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image2_image_left_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image2_antidistrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' b) a) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' (t.image g') s :=
(image_image2_antidistrib h_antidistrib).trans <| by rw [image_id']
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_right_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image2_antidistrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : β → α' → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' b (g' a)) :
(image2 f s t).image g = image2 f' t (s.image g') :=
(image_image2_antidistrib h_antidistrib).trans <| by rw [image_id']
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_antidistrib_left`. -/
theorem image2_image_left_anticomm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_anticomm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' b a)) :
image2 f (s.image g) t = (image2 f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image2_antidistrib_left fun a b => (h_left_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Set.image_image2_antidistrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image2_right_anticomm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_anticomm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' b a)) :
image2 f s (t.image g) = (image2 f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image2_antidistrib_right fun a b => (h_right_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- If `a` is a left identity for `f : α → β → β`, then `{a}` is a left identity for
`Set.image2 f`. -/
lemma image2_left_identity {f : α → β → β} {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f a b = b) (t : Set β) :
image2 f {a} t = t := by
rw [image2_singleton_left, show f a = id from funext h, image_id]
/-- If `b` is a right identity for `f : α → β → α`, then `{b}` is a right identity for
`Set.image2 f`. -/
lemma image2_right_identity {f : α → β → α} {b : β} (h : ∀ a, f a b = a) (s : Set α) :
image2 f s {b} = s := by
rw [image2_singleton_right, funext h, image_id']
theorem image2_inter_union_subset_union :
image2 f (s ∩ s') (t ∪ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t' := by
rw [image2_union_right]
exact
union_subset_union (image2_subset_right inter_subset_left)
(image2_subset_right inter_subset_right)
theorem image2_union_inter_subset_union :
image2 f (s ∪ s') (t ∩ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t' := by
rw [image2_union_left]
exact
union_subset_union (image2_subset_left inter_subset_left)
(image2_subset_left inter_subset_right)
theorem image2_inter_union_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Set α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image2 f (s ∩ t) (s ∪ t) ⊆ image2 f s t := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact image2_inter_union_subset_union.trans (union_subset (image2_comm hf).subset Subset.rfl)
theorem image2_union_inter_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Set α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image2 f (s ∪ t) (s ∩ t) ⊆ image2 f s t := by
rw [image2_comm hf]
exact image2_inter_union_subset hf
end Set
| Mathlib/Data/Set/NAry.lean | 374 | 379 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,258 | 1,262 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.BalancedCoreHull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Von Neumann Boundedness
This file defines natural or von Neumann bounded sets and proves elementary properties.
## Main declarations
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded`: A set `s` is von Neumann-bounded if every neighborhood of zero
absorbs `s`.
* `Bornology.vonNBornology`: The bornology made of the von Neumann-bounded sets.
## Main results
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le`: A coarser topology admits more
von Neumann-bounded sets.
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.image`: A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded.
* `Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero`: Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends
to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`,
`ε • x` tends to 0. This shows that bounded sets are completely determined by sequences, which is
the key fact for proving that sequential continuity implies continuity for linear maps defined on
a bornological space
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
-/
variable {𝕜 𝕜' E F ι : Type*}
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Topology Pointwise
namespace Bornology
section SeminormedRing
section Zero
variable (𝕜)
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Zero E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- A set `s` is von Neumann bounded if every neighborhood of 0 absorbs `s`. -/
def IsVonNBounded (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) → Absorbs 𝕜 V s
variable (E)
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_empty : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ _ => Absorbs.empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem isVonNBounded_iff (s : Set E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Absorbs 𝕜 V s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff {q : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} {A : Set E}
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis q s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 A ↔ ∀ i, q i → Absorbs 𝕜 (s i) A := by
refine ⟨fun hA i hi => hA (h.mem_of_mem hi), fun hA V hV => ?_⟩
rcases h.mem_iff.mp hV with ⟨i, hi, hV⟩
exact (hA i hi).mono_left hV
/-- Subsets of bounded sets are bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁ := fun _ hV => (hs₂ hV).mono_right h
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_union {s t : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s ∪ t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_union, forall_and]
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.union {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (hs₁ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s₁ ∪ s₂) := isVonNBounded_union.2 ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace 𝕜] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := fun _ _ ↦
.of_boundedSpace
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
fun U hU ↦ .of_forall fun c ↦ calc
s ⊆ univ := subset_univ s
_ = c • U := .symm <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty <| (Filter.nonempty_of_mem hU).image _
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_iUnion, @forall_swap ι]
theorem isVonNBounded_biUnion {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
have _ := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, isVonNBounded_iUnion, Subtype.forall]
theorem isVonNBounded_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : S.Finite) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, isVonNBounded_biUnion hS]
end Zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddZeroClass E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.add (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) := fun U hU ↦ by
rcases exists_open_nhds_zero_add_subset hU with ⟨V, hVo, hV, hVU⟩
exact ((hs <| hVo.mem_nhds hV).add (ht <| hVo.mem_nhds hV)).mono_left hVU
end ContinuousAdd
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
[DistribMulAction 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.neg (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) := fun U hU ↦ by
rw [← neg_neg U]
exact (hs <| neg_mem_nhds_zero _ hU).neg_neg
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_neg : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (-s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg s ▸ h.neg, fun h ↦ h.neg⟩
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.of_neg, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_neg
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.sub (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (ht : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hs.add ht.neg
end IsTopologicalAddGroup
end SeminormedRing
section MultipleTopologies
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- If a topology `t'` is coarser than `t`, then any set `s` that is bounded with respect to
`t` is bounded with respect to `t'`. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace E} (h : t ≤ t') {s : Set E}
(hs : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t s) : @IsVonNBounded 𝕜 E _ _ _ t' s := fun _ hV =>
hs <| (le_iff_nhds t t').mp h 0 hV
end MultipleTopologies
lemma isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ Tendsto (· • S : 𝕜 → Set E) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0).smallSets := by
rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun V hV ↦ ?_
simp only [absorbs_iff_eventually_nhds_zero (mem_of_mem_nhds hV), mapsTo', image_smul]
alias ⟨IsVonNBounded.tendsto_smallSets_nhds, _⟩ := isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds
lemma isVonNBounded_iff_absorbing_le {𝕜 E : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ Filter.absorbing 𝕜 S ≤ 𝓝 0 :=
.rfl
lemma isVonNBounded_pi_iff {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
[∀ i, AddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, Module 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (E i)]
{S : Set (∀ i, E i)} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (eval i '' S) := by
simp_rw [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, smallSets_iInf,
smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def,
← image_smul, image_image, eval, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
section Image
variable {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₁] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module 𝕜₁ E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded. -/
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.image {σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomSurjective σ] [RingHomIsometric σ]
{s : Set E} (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₁ s) (f : E →SL[σ] F) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜₂ (f '' s) := by
have σ_iso : Isometry σ := AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm σ fun x => RingHomIsometric.is_iso
have : map σ (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 0 := by
rw [σ_iso.isEmbedding.map_nhds_eq, σ.surjective.range_eq, nhdsWithin_univ, map_zero]
have hf₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := f.continuous.tendsto' 0 0 (map_zero f)
simp only [isVonNBounded_iff_tendsto_smallSets_nhds, ← this, tendsto_map'_iff] at hs ⊢
simpa only [comp_def, image_smul_setₛₗ] using hf₀.image_smallSets.comp hs
end Image
section sequence
theorem IsVonNBounded.smul_tendsto_zero [NormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
{S : Set E} {ε : ι → 𝕜} {x : ι → E} {l : Filter ι}
(hS : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S) (hxS : ∀ᶠ n in l, x n ∈ S) (hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
(hS.tendsto_smallSets_nhds.comp hε).of_smallSets <| hxS.mono fun _ ↦ smul_mem_smul_set
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕜} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : ∀ᶠ n in l, ε n ≠ 0) {S : Set E}
(H : ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0)) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S := by
rw [(nhds_basis_balanced 𝕜 E).isVonNBounded_iff]
by_contra! H'
rcases H' with ⟨V, ⟨hV, hVb⟩, hVS⟩
have : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∃ x : S, ε n • (x : E) ∉ V := by
filter_upwards [hε] with n hn
rw [absorbs_iff_norm] at hVS
push_neg at hVS
rcases hVS ‖(ε n)⁻¹‖ with ⟨a, haε, haS⟩
rcases Set.not_subset.mp haS with ⟨x, hxS, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, hxS⟩, fun hnx => ?_⟩
rw [← Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hn] at hnx
exact hx (hVb.smul_mono haε hnx)
rcases this.choice with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine Filter.frequently_false l (Filter.Eventually.frequently ?_)
filter_upwards [hx,
(H (_ ∘ x) fun n => (x n).2).eventually (eventually_mem_set.mpr hV)] using fun n => id
/-- Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded
if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`, `ε • x` tends to 0. This actually works for any
indexing type `ι`, but in the special case `ι = ℕ` we get the important fact that convergent
sequences fully characterize bounded sets. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero {ε : ι → 𝕜} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot]
(hε : Tendsto ε l (𝓝[≠] 0)) {S : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 S ↔ ∀ x : ι → E, (∀ n, x n ∈ S) → Tendsto (ε • x) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun hS _ hxS => hS.smul_tendsto_zero (Eventually.of_forall hxS) (le_trans hε nhdsWithin_le_nhds),
isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero (by exact hε self_mem_nhdsWithin)⟩
end sequence
/-- If a set is von Neumann bounded with respect to a smaller field,
then it is also von Neumann bounded with respect to a larger field.
See also `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.restrict_scalars` below. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.extend_scalars [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
(𝕝 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕝] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕝]
[Module 𝕝 E] [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕝 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕝 E]
{s : Set E} (h : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕝 s := by
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hε₀⟩ : ∃ ε : ℕ → 𝕜, Tendsto ε atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ε n ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff] using exists_seq_tendsto (𝓝[≠] (0 : 𝕜))
refine isVonNBounded_of_smul_tendsto_zero (ε := (ε · • 1)) (by simpa) fun x hx ↦ ?_
have := h.smul_tendsto_zero (.of_forall hx) hε
simpa only [Pi.smul_def', smul_one_smul]
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- Singletons are bounded. -/
theorem isVonNBounded_singleton (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 ({x} : Set E) := fun _ hV =>
(absorbent_nhds_zero hV).absorbs
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_insert (x : E) {s : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (insert x s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
simp only [← singleton_union, isVonNBounded_union, isVonNBounded_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, IsVonNBounded.insert⟩ := isVonNBounded_insert
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd E] {s t : Set E}
protected theorem IsVonNBounded.vadd (hs : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s) (x : E) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) := by
rw [← singleton_vadd]
-- TODO: dot notation timeouts in the next line
exact IsVonNBounded.add (isVonNBounded_singleton x) hs
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_vadd (x : E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (x +ᵥ s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.vadd (-x), fun h ↦ h.vadd x⟩
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_right (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
(isVonNBounded_vadd x).mp <| hst.subset <| image_subset_image2_right hx
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_add_left (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t)) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
((add_comm s t).subst hst).of_add_right ht
theorem isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.of_add_left ht, h.of_add_right hs⟩, and_imp.2 IsVonNBounded.add⟩
theorem isVonNBounded_add :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + t) ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ ∨ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs; · simp
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ht; · simp
simp [hs.ne_empty, ht.ne_empty, isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty hs ht]
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_add_self : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s + s) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [isVonNBounded_add_of_nonempty, *]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_sub_left (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t)) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
((sub_eq_add_neg s t).subst hst).of_add_left ht.neg
end ContinuousAdd
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
| variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] {s t : Set E}
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_sub_right (hst : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s - t)) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded.lean | 324 | 326 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
/-!
# N-ary images of sets
This file defines `Set.image2`, the binary image of sets.
This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations and `Set.seq`.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Finset.NAry`, to `Order.Filter.NAry`, and to
`Data.Option.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ}
variable {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} {u : Set γ} {v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem mem_image2_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a', ha', b', hb', h⟩
rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩, fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
/-- image2 is monotone with respect to `⊆`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb)
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s t' :=
image2_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t :=
image2_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image2_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ ha => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image2_right (ha : a ∈ s) : f a '' t ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ => mem_image2_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
lemma exists_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image2_iff := forall_mem_image2
@[simp]
theorem image2_subset_iff {u : Set γ} : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image2
theorem image2_subset_iff_left : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (fun b => f a b) '' t ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage]
theorem image2_subset_iff_right : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage, @forall₂_swap α]
variable (f)
@[simp]
lemma image_prod : (fun x : α × β ↦ f x.1 x.2) '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
ext fun _ ↦ by simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] lemma image_uncurry_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : uncurry f '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
image_prod _
@[simp] lemma image2_mk_eq_prod : image2 Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := ext <| by simp
@[simp]
lemma image2_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 (fun a b ↦ f (a, b)) s t = f '' s ×ˢ t := by
simp [← image_uncurry_prod, uncurry]
theorem image2_swap (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => f b a) t s := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨b, hb, a, ha, rfl⟩
variable {f}
theorem image2_union_left : image2 f (s ∪ s') t = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_prod, union_prod, image_union]
theorem image2_union_right : image2 f s (t ∪ t') = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s t' := by
rw [← image2_swap, image2_union_left, image2_swap f, image2_swap f]
lemma image2_inter_left (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f (s ∩ s') t = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, inter_prod, image_inter hf.uncurry]
lemma image2_inter_right (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f s (t ∩ t') = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, prod_inter, image_inter hf.uncurry]
@[simp]
| theorem image2_empty_left : image2 f ∅ t = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
| Mathlib/Data/Set/NAry.lean | 107 | 108 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
| a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 209 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro,
Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Lattice structure of lists
This files prove basic properties about `List.disjoint`, `List.union`, `List.inter` and
`List.bagInter`, which are defined in core Lean and `Data.List.Defs`.
`l₁ ∪ l₂` is the list where all elements of `l₁` have been inserted in `l₂` in order. For example,
`[0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 3] ∪ [4, 3, 3, 0] = [1, 2, 4, 3, 3, 0]`
`l₁ ∩ l₂` is the list of elements of `l₁` in order which are in `l₂`. For example,
`[0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 3] ∪ [4, 3, 3, 0] = [0, 0, 3]`
`List.bagInter l₁ l₂` is the list of elements that are in both `l₁` and `l₂`,
counted with multiplicity and in the order they appear in `l₁`.
As opposed to `List.inter`, `List.bagInter` copes well with multiplicity. For example,
`bagInter [0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0] [1, 0, 1, 4, 3] = [0, 1, 3, 1]`
-/
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} {l₁ l₂ : List α} {p : α → Prop} {a : α}
/-! ### `Disjoint` -/
section Disjoint
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
end Disjoint
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-! ### `union` -/
section Union
theorem mem_union_left (h : a ∈ l₁) (l₂ : List α) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union_iff.2 (Or.inl h)
theorem mem_union_right (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
mem_union_iff.2 (Or.inr h)
theorem sublist_suffix_of_union : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, ∃ t, t <+ l₁ ∧ t ++ l₂ = l₁ ∪ l₂
| [], _ => ⟨[], by rfl, rfl⟩
| a :: l₁, l₂ =>
let ⟨t, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂
if h : a ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ then
⟨t, sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s, by
simp only [e, cons_union, insert_of_mem h]⟩
else
⟨a :: t, s.cons_cons _, by
simp only [cons_append, cons_union, e, insert_of_not_mem h]⟩
theorem suffix_union_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ∪ l₂ :=
(sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂).imp fun _ => And.right
theorem union_sublist_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
let ⟨_, s, e⟩ := sublist_suffix_of_union l₁ l₂
e ▸ (append_sublist_append_right _).2 s
theorem forall_mem_union : (∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) ↔ (∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) ∧ ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x := by
simp only [mem_union_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_left (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).1
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_union_right (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂, p x) : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x :=
(forall_mem_union.1 h).2
theorem Subset.union_eq_right {xs ys : List α} (h : xs ⊆ ys) : xs ∪ ys = ys := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
rw [cons_union, insert_of_mem <| mem_union_right _ <| h mem_cons_self,
ih <| subset_of_cons_subset h]
end Union
/-! ### `inter` -/
section Inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_nil (l : List α) : [] ∩ l = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inter_cons_of_mem (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∈ l₂) : (a :: l₁) ∩ l₂ = a :: l₁ ∩ l₂ := by
simp [Inter.inter, List.inter, h]
@[simp]
theorem inter_cons_of_not_mem (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₂) : (a :: l₁) ∩ l₂ = l₁ ∩ l₂ := by
simp [Inter.inter, List.inter, h]
@[simp]
theorem inter_nil' (l : List α) : l ∩ [] = [] := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih => by_cases x ∈ xs <;> simp [ih]
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ :=
mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right (h : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂) : a ∈ l₂ := by simpa using of_mem_filter h
theorem mem_inter_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : a ∈ l₁) (h₂ : a ∈ l₂) : a ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ :=
mem_filter_of_mem h₁ <| by simpa using h₂
theorem inter_subset_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₁ :=
filter_subset' _
theorem inter_subset_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ∩ l₂ ⊆ l₂ := fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem subset_inter {l l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l ⊆ l₁) (h₂ : l ⊆ l₂) : l ⊆ l₁ ∩ l₂ := fun _ h =>
mem_inter_iff.2 ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
theorem inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint : l₁ ∩ l₂ = [] ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
rfl
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.inter_eq_nil⟩ := inter_eq_nil_iff_disjoint
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_left (h : ∀ x ∈ l₁, p x) (l₂ : List α) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
BAll.imp_left (fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_left) h
theorem forall_mem_inter_of_forall_right (l₁ : List α) (h : ∀ x ∈ l₂, p x) :
∀ x, x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ → p x :=
BAll.imp_left (fun _ => mem_of_mem_inter_right) h
@[simp]
theorem inter_reverse {xs ys : List α} : xs.inter ys.reverse = xs.inter ys := by
simp only [List.inter, elem_eq_mem, mem_reverse]
theorem Subset.inter_eq_left {xs ys : List α} (h : xs ⊆ ys) : xs ∩ ys = xs :=
List.filter_eq_self.mpr fun _ ha => elem_eq_true_of_mem (h ha)
end Inter
/-! ### `bagInter` -/
section BagInter
@[simp]
theorem nil_bagInter (l : List α) : [].bagInter l = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem bagInter_nil (l : List α) : l.bagInter [] = [] := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_bagInter_of_pos (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∈ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bagInter l₂ = a :: l₁.bagInter (l₂.erase a) := by
cases l₂
· exact if_pos h
· simp only [List.bagInter, if_pos (elem_eq_true_of_mem h)]
@[simp]
theorem cons_bagInter_of_neg (l₁ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₂) :
(a :: l₁).bagInter l₂ = l₁.bagInter l₂ := by
cases l₂; · simp only [bagInter_nil]
simp only [erase_of_not_mem h, List.bagInter, if_neg (mt mem_of_elem_eq_true h)]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bagInter {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, a ∈ l₁.bagInter l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∈ l₂
| [], l₂ => by simp only [nil_bagInter, not_mem_nil, false_and]
| b :: l₁, l₂ => by
by_cases h : b ∈ l₂
· rw [cons_bagInter_of_pos _ h, mem_cons, mem_cons, mem_bagInter]
by_cases ba : a = b
· simp only [ba, h, eq_self_iff_true, true_or, true_and]
· simp only [mem_erase_of_ne ba, ba, false_or]
· rw [cons_bagInter_of_neg _ h, mem_bagInter, mem_cons, or_and_right]
symm
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro ⟨rfl, h'⟩
exact h.elim h'
@[simp]
theorem count_bagInter {a : α} :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, count a (l₁.bagInter l₂) = min (count a l₁) (count a l₂)
| [], l₂ => by simp
| l₁, [] => by simp
| b :: l₁, l₂ => by
by_cases hb : b ∈ l₂
· rw [cons_bagInter_of_pos _ hb, count_cons, count_cons, count_bagInter, count_erase,
← Nat.add_min_add_right]
by_cases ba : b = a
· simp only [beq_iff_eq]
rw [if_pos ba, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
rwa [succ_le_iff, count_pos_iff, ← ba]
· simp only [beq_iff_eq]
rw [if_neg ba, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.add_zero]
· rw [cons_bagInter_of_neg _ hb, count_bagInter]
by_cases ab : a = b
· rw [← ab] at hb
rw [count_eq_zero.2 hb, Nat.min_zero, Nat.min_zero]
· rw [count_cons_of_ne (Ne.symm ab)]
theorem bagInter_sublist_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.bagInter l₂ <+ l₁
| [], l₂ => by simp
| b :: l₁, l₂ => by
by_cases h : b ∈ l₂ <;> simp only [h, cons_bagInter_of_pos, cons_bagInter_of_neg, not_false_iff]
· exact (bagInter_sublist_left _ _).cons_cons _
· apply sublist_cons_of_sublist
apply bagInter_sublist_left
theorem bagInter_nil_iff_inter_nil : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.bagInter l₂ = [] ↔ l₁ ∩ l₂ = []
| [], l₂ => by simp
| b :: l₁, l₂ => by
by_cases h : b ∈ l₂
· simp [h]
· simpa [h] using bagInter_nil_iff_inter_nil l₁ l₂
end BagInter
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Lattice.lean | 234 | 250 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-!
# Derivative is measurable
In this file we prove that the derivative of any function with complete codomain is a measurable
function. Namely, we prove:
* `measurableSet_of_differentiableAt`: the set `{x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x}` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv`: the function `fderiv 𝕜 f` is measurable;
* `measurable_fderiv_apply_const`: for a fixed vector `y`, the function `fun x ↦ fderiv 𝕜 f x y`
is measurable;
* `measurable_deriv`: the function `deriv f` is measurable (for `f : 𝕜 → F`).
We also show the same results for the right derivative on the real line
(see `measurable_derivWithin_Ici` and `measurable_derivWithin_Ioi`), following the same
proof strategy.
We also prove measurability statements for functions depending on a parameter: for `f : α → E → F`,
we show the measurability of `(p : α × E) ↦ fderiv 𝕜 (f p.1) p.2`. This requires additional
assumptions. We give versions of the above statements (appending `with_param` to their names) when
`f` is continuous and `E` is locally compact.
## Implementation
We give a proof that avoids second-countability issues, by expressing the differentiability set
as a function of open sets in the following way. Define `A (L, r, ε)` to be the set of points
where, on a ball of radius roughly `r` around `x`, the function is uniformly approximated by the
linear map `L`, up to `ε r`. It is an open set.
Let also `B (L, r, s, ε) = A (L, r, ε) ∩ A (L, s, ε)`: we require that at two possibly different
scales `r` and `s`, the function is well approximated by the linear map `L`. It is also open.
We claim that the differentiability set of `f` is exactly
`D = ⋂ ε > 0, ⋃ δ > 0, ⋂ r, s < δ, ⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)`.
In other words, for any `ε > 0`, we require that there is a size `δ` such that, for any two scales
below this size, the function is well approximated by a linear map, common to the two scales.
The set `⋃ L, B (L, r, s, ε)` is open, as a union of open sets. Converting the intersections and
unions to countable ones (using real numbers of the form `2 ^ (-n)`), it follows that the
differentiability set is measurable.
To prove the claim, there are two inclusions. One is trivial: if the function is differentiable
at `x`, then `x` belongs to `D` (just take `L` to be the derivative, and use that the
differentiability exactly says that the map is well approximated by `L`). This is proved in
`mem_A_of_differentiable` and `differentiable_set_subset_D`.
For the other direction, the difficulty is that `L` in the union may depend on `ε, r, s`. The key
point is that, in fact, it doesn't depend too much on them. First, if `x` belongs both to
`A (L, r, ε)` and `A (L', r, ε)`, then `L` and `L'` have to be close on a shell, and thus
`‖L - L'‖` is bounded by `ε` (see `norm_sub_le_of_mem_A`). Assume now `x ∈ D`. If one has two maps
`L` and `L'` such that `x` belongs to `A (L, r, ε)` and to `A (L', r', ε')`, one deduces that `L` is
close to `L'` by arguing as follows. Consider another scale `s` smaller than `r` and `r'`. Take a
linear map `L₁` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r` and `s` w.r.t. `ε` (it exists as
`x` belongs to `D`). Take also `L₂` that approximates `f` around `x` both at scales `r'` and `s`
w.r.t. `ε'`. Then `L₁` is close to `L` (as they are close on a shell of radius `r`), and `L₂` is
close to `L₁` (as they are close on a shell of radius `s`), and `L'` is close to `L₂` (as they are
close on a shell of radius `r'`). It follows that `L` is close to `L'`, as we claimed.
It follows that the different approximating linear maps that show up form a Cauchy sequence when
`ε` tends to `0`. When the target space is complete, this sequence converges, to a limit `f'`.
With the same kind of arguments, one checks that `f` is differentiable with derivative `f'`.
To show that the derivative itself is measurable, add in the definition of `B` and `D` a set
`K` of continuous linear maps to which `L` should belong. Then, when `K` is complete, the set `D K`
is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable with a derivative in `K`.
## Tags
derivative, measurable function, Borel σ-algebra
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Metric Asymptotics Filter ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
theorem measurable_apply₂ [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither (E →L[𝕜] F) E]
[MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] : Measurable fun p : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E => p.1 p.2 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.measurable
end ContinuousLinearMap
section fderiv
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : E → F} (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F))
namespace FDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to make sure that
this is an open set. -/
def A (f : E → F) (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ y ∈ ball x r', ∀ z ∈ ball x r', ‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ < ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a continuous linear map
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of continuous linear maps) that approximates well the
function `f` (up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set E :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : E → F) (K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) : Set E :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem isOpen_A (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r ε : ℝ) : IsOpen (A f L r ε) := by
rw [Metric.isOpen_iff]
rintro x ⟨r', r'_mem, hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between r'_mem.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le r'_mem.2)⟩
refine ⟨r' - s, by linarith, fun x' hx' => ⟨s, this, ?_⟩⟩
have B : ball x' s ⊆ ball x r' := ball_subset (le_of_lt hx')
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (B hy) z (B hz)
theorem isOpen_B {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {r s ε : ℝ} : IsOpen (B f K r s ε) := by
simp [B, isOpen_biUnion, IsOpen.inter, isOpen_A]
theorem A_mono (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans_le (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [mem_ball.1 hy, r'r.2, @dist_nonneg _ _ y x]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : E}
(hy : y ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ closedBall x (r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - L (z - y)‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
apply le_of_lt
exact hr' _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hy).trans_lt r'mem.1) _ ((mem_closedBall.1 hz).trans_lt r'mem.1)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) r ε := by
let δ := (ε / 2) / 2
obtain ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩ :
∃ R > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, ‖f y - f x - fderiv 𝕜 f x (y - x)‖ ≤ δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
eventually_nhds_iff_ball.1 <| hx.hasFDerivAt.isLittleO.bound <| by positivity
refine ⟨R, R_pos, fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := right_mem_Ioc.2 <| half_lt_self hr.1
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - y)‖ =
‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x) - (f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x))‖ := by
simp only [map_sub]; abel_nf
_ ≤ ‖f z - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (z - x)‖ + ‖f y - f x - (fderiv 𝕜 f x) (y - x)‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ * ‖z - x‖ + δ * ‖y - x‖ :=
add_le_add (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hz)) (hR _ (ball_subset_ball hr.2.le hy))
_ ≤ δ * r + δ * r := by rw [mem_ball_iff_norm] at hz hy; gcongr
_ = (ε / 2) * r := by ring
_ < ε * r := by gcongr; exacts [hr.1, half_lt_self hε]
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {r ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hr : 0 < r) {x : E}
{L₁ L₂ : E →L[𝕜] F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε) (h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * ε := by
refine opNorm_le_of_shell (half_pos hr) (by positivity) hc ?_
intro y ley ylt
rw [div_div, div_le_iff₀' (mul_pos (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 2) (zero_lt_one.trans hc))] at ley
calc
‖(L₁ - L₂) y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x) - (f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x))‖ := by
simp
_ ≤ ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₂ (x + y - x)‖ + ‖f (x + y) - f x - L₁ (x + y - x)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁
· simp only [le_of_lt (half_pos hr), mem_closedBall, dist_self]
· simp only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, ylt.le]
_ = 2 * ε * r := by ring
_ ≤ 2 * ε * (2 * ‖c‖ * ‖y‖) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * ‖c‖ * ε * ‖y‖ := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := by positivity
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨fderiv 𝕜 f x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q →
n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A hc P P (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
norm_add₃_le
_ ≤ 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → E →L[𝕜] F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (by positivity) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * ‖c‖ * (ε / (12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε := by field_simp
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole ball of radius `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
have pos : 0 < 4 + 12 * ‖c‖ := by positivity
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos pos) (by norm_num)
rw [eventually_nhds_iff_ball]
refine ⟨(1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1), P, fun y hy => ?_⟩
-- We need to show that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
by_cases y_pos : y = 0
· simp [y_pos]
have yzero : 0 < ‖y‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr y_pos
have y_lt : ‖y‖ < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by simpa using mem_ball_iff_norm.1 hy
have yone : ‖y‖ ≤ 1 := le_trans y_lt.le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < ‖y‖ ∧ ‖y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_trans hk y_lt
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J1 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m (x + y - x)‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
positivity
· simpa only [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall, pow_succ, mul_one_div] using
h'k
have J2 : ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left] using J1
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ := by gcongr
-- use the previous estimates to see that `f (x + y) - f x - f' y` is small.
calc
‖f (x + y) - f x - f' y‖ = ‖f (x + y) - f x - L e (n e) m y + (L e (n e) m - f') y‖ :=
congr_arg _ (by simp)
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ + 12 * ‖c‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y‖ :=
norm_add_le_of_le J2 <| (le_opNorm _ _).trans <| by gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ (4 + 12 * ‖c‖) * ‖y‖ * (ε / (4 + 12 * ‖c‖)) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y‖ := by field_simp [ne_of_gt pos]; ring
rw [← this.fderiv] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end FDerivMeasurableAux
open FDerivMeasurableAux
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
variable (𝕜 f)
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete set,
is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete {K : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ K } := by
-- Porting note: was
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D, isOpen_B.measurableSet, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [D, differentiable_set_eq_D K hK]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact isOpen_B.measurableSet
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableAt : MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete 𝕜 f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv : Measurable (fderiv 𝕜 f) := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
fderiv 𝕜 f ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x } ∩ { _x | (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans fderiv_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_of_isComplete _ _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableAt _ _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_fderiv_apply_const [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (y : E) :
Measurable fun x => fderiv 𝕜 f x y :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.measurable_apply y).comp (measurable_fderiv 𝕜 f)
variable {𝕜}
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : Measurable (deriv f) := by
simpa only [fderiv_deriv] using measurable_fderiv_apply_const 𝕜 f 1
theorem stronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) : StronglyMeasurable (deriv f) := by
borelize F
rcases h.out with h𝕜|hF
· exact stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2
⟨measurable_deriv f, isSeparable_range_deriv _⟩
· exact (measurable_deriv f).stronglyMeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace F]
[BorelSpace F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) : AEMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(measurable_deriv f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_deriv [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] [OpensMeasurableSpace 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither 𝕜 F] (f : 𝕜 → F) (μ : Measure 𝕜) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (deriv f) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_deriv f).aestronglyMeasurable
end fderiv
section RightDeriv
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable {f : ℝ → F} (K : Set F)
namespace RightDerivMeasurableAux
/-- The set `A f L r ε` is the set of points `x` around which the function `f` is well approximated
at scale `r` by the linear map `h ↦ h • L`, up to an error `ε`. We tweak the definition to
make sure that this is open on the right. -/
def A (f : ℝ → F) (L : F) (r ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
{ x | ∃ r' ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r, ∀ᵉ (y ∈ Icc x (x + r')) (z ∈ Icc x (x + r')),
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r }
/-- The set `B f K r s ε` is the set of points `x` around which there exists a vector
`L` belonging to `K` (a given set of vectors) such that `h • L` approximates well `f (x + h)`
(up to an error `ε`), simultaneously at scales `r` and `s`. -/
def B (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) (r s ε : ℝ) : Set ℝ :=
⋃ L ∈ K, A f L r ε ∩ A f L s ε
/-- The set `D f K` is a complicated set constructed using countable intersections and unions. Its
main use is that, when `K` is complete, it is exactly the set of points where `f` is differentiable,
with a derivative in `K`. -/
def D (f : ℝ → F) (K : Set F) : Set ℝ :=
⋂ e : ℕ, ⋃ n : ℕ, ⋂ (p ≥ n) (q ≥ n), B f K ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e)
theorem A_mem_nhdsGT {L : F} {r ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) : A f L r ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', rr', hr'⟩
obtain ⟨s, s_gt, s_lt⟩ : ∃ s : ℝ, r / 2 < s ∧ s < r' := exists_between rr'.1
have : s ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨s_gt, le_of_lt (s_lt.trans_le rr'.2)⟩
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT <| show x < x + r' - s by linarith] with x' hx'
use s, this
have A : Icc x' (x' + s) ⊆ Icc x (x + r') := by
apply Icc_subset_Icc hx'.1.le
linarith [hx'.2]
intro y hy z hz
exact hr' y (A hy) z (A hz)
theorem B_mem_nhdsGT {K : Set F} {r s ε x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ B f K r s ε) :
B f K r s ε ∈ 𝓝[>] x := by
obtain ⟨L, LK, hL₁, hL₂⟩ : ∃ L : F, L ∈ K ∧ x ∈ A f L r ε ∧ x ∈ A f L s ε := by
simpa only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop] using hx
filter_upwards [A_mem_nhdsGT hL₁, A_mem_nhdsGT hL₂] with y hy₁ hy₂
simp only [B, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨L, LK, hy₁, hy₂⟩
theorem measurableSet_B {K : Set F} {r s ε : ℝ} : MeasurableSet (B f K r s ε) :=
.of_mem_nhdsGT fun _ hx => B_mem_nhdsGT hx
theorem A_mono (L : F) (r : ℝ) {ε δ : ℝ} (h : ε ≤ δ) : A f L r ε ⊆ A f L r δ := by
rintro x ⟨r', r'r, hr'⟩
refine ⟨r', r'r, fun y hy z hz => (hr' y hy z hz).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h ?_)⟩
linarith [hy.1, hy.2, r'r.2]
theorem le_of_mem_A {r ε : ℝ} {L : F} {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ A f L r ε) {y z : ℝ}
(hy : y ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) (hz : z ∈ Icc x (x + r / 2)) :
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • L‖ ≤ ε * r := by
rcases hx with ⟨r', r'mem, hr'⟩
have A : x + r / 2 ≤ x + r' := by linarith [r'mem.1]
exact hr' _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hy) _ ((Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl A) hz)
theorem mem_A_of_differentiable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {x : ℝ}
(hx : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ r ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) R, x ∈ A f (derivWithin f (Ici x) x) r ε := by
have := hx.hasDerivWithinAt
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff] at this
rcases mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset.1 (this (half_pos hε)) with ⟨m, xm, hm⟩
refine ⟨m - x, by linarith [show x < m from xm], fun r hr => ?_⟩
have : r ∈ Ioc (r / 2) r := ⟨half_lt_self hr.1, le_rfl⟩
refine ⟨r, this, fun y hy z hz => ?_⟩
calc
‖f z - f y - (z - y) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ =
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x -
(f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x)‖ := by
congr 1; simp only [sub_smul]; abel
_ ≤
‖f z - f x - (z - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ +
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • derivWithin f (Ici x) x‖ :=
(norm_sub_le _ _)
_ ≤ ε / 2 * ‖z - x‖ + ε / 2 * ‖y - x‖ :=
(add_le_add (hm ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩)
(hm ⟨hy.1, hy.2.trans_lt (by linarith [hr.2])⟩))
_ ≤ ε / 2 * r + ε / 2 * r := by
gcongr
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hz.1, hz.2]
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg] <;> linarith [hy.1, hy.2]
_ = ε * r := by ring
theorem norm_sub_le_of_mem_A {r x : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ε : ℝ) {L₁ L₂ : F} (h₁ : x ∈ A f L₁ r ε)
(h₂ : x ∈ A f L₂ r ε) : ‖L₁ - L₂‖ ≤ 4 * ε := by
suffices H : ‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ ≤ r / 2 * (4 * ε) by
rwa [norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (half_pos hr).le, mul_le_mul_left (half_pos hr)] at H
calc
‖(r / 2) • (L₁ - L₂)‖ =
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂ -
(f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁)‖ := by
simp [smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₂‖ +
‖f (x + r / 2) - f x - (x + r / 2 - x) • L₁‖ :=
norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * r + ε * r := by
apply add_le_add
· apply le_of_mem_A h₂ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
· apply le_of_mem_A h₁ <;> simp [(half_pos hr).le]
_ = r / 2 * (4 * ε) := by ring
/-- Easy inclusion: a differentiability point with derivative in `K` belongs to `D f K`. -/
theorem differentiable_set_subset_D :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } ⊆ D f K := by
intro x hx
rw [D, mem_iInter]
intro e
have : (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ e := pow_pos (by norm_num) _
rcases mem_A_of_differentiable this hx.1 with ⟨R, R_pos, hR⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ n < R :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one R_pos (by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, B, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨n, fun p hp q hq => ⟨derivWithin f (Ici x) x, hx.2, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩ <;>
· refine hR _ ⟨pow_pos (by norm_num) _, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hn⟩
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (by assumption)
/-- Harder inclusion: at a point in `D f K`, the function `f` has a derivative, in `K`. -/
theorem D_subset_differentiable_set {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
D f K ⊆ { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
have P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (0 : ℝ) < (1 / 2) ^ n := fun {n} => pow_pos (by norm_num) n
intro x hx
have :
∀ e : ℕ, ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ p q, n ≤ p → n ≤ q →
∃ L ∈ K, x ∈ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) ∩ A f L ((1 / 2) ^ q) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := by
intro e
have := mem_iInter.1 hx e
rcases mem_iUnion.1 this with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun p q hp hq => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_iInter] at hn
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (hn p hp q hq) with ⟨L, hL⟩
exact ⟨L, exists_prop.mp <| mem_iUnion.1 hL⟩
/- Recast the assumptions: for each `e`, there exist `n e` and linear maps `L e p q` in `K`
such that, for `p, q ≥ n e`, then `f` is well approximated by `L e p q` at scale `2 ^ (-p)` and
`2 ^ (-q)`, with an error `2 ^ (-e)`. -/
choose! n L hn using this
/- All the operators `L e p q` that show up are close to each other. To prove this, we argue
that `L e p q` is close to `L e p r` (where `r` is large enough), as both approximate `f` at
scale `2 ^(- p)`. And `L e p r` is close to `L e' p' r` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- r)`. And `L e' p' r` is close to `L e' p' q'` as both approximate `f` at scale
`2 ^ (- p')`. -/
have M :
∀ e p q e' p' q',
n e ≤ p →
n e ≤ q → n e' ≤ p' → n e' ≤ q' → e ≤ e' → ‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p q e' p' q' hp hq hp' hq' he'
let r := max (n e) (n e')
have I : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ e' ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num) he'
have J1 : ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p q) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p q hp hq).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ p) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 I2
have J2 : ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e p r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e) := (hn e p r hp (le_max_left _ _)).2.2
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ r) ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.2
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ I1 (A_mono _ _ I I2)
have J3 : ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
have I1 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' r) ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') :=
(hn e' p' r hp' (le_max_right _ _)).2.1
have I2 : x ∈ A f (L e' p' q') ((1 / 2) ^ p') ((1 / 2) ^ e') := (hn e' p' q' hp' hq').2.1
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_A P _ (A_mono _ _ I I1) (A_mono _ _ I I2)
calc
‖L e p q - L e' p' q'‖ =
‖L e p q - L e p r + (L e p r - L e' p' r) + (L e' p' r - L e' p' q')‖ := by
congr 1; abel
_ ≤ ‖L e p q - L e p r‖ + ‖L e p r - L e' p' r‖ + ‖L e' p' r - L e' p' q'‖ :=
(le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) (add_le_add_right (norm_add_le _ _) _))
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e + 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by gcongr
_ = 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
/- For definiteness, use `L0 e = L e (n e) (n e)`, to have a single sequence. We claim that this
is a Cauchy sequence. -/
let L0 : ℕ → F := fun e => L e (n e) (n e)
have : CauchySeq L0 := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff']
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 12 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
refine ⟨e, fun e' he' => ?_⟩
rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm]
calc
‖L0 e - L0 e'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl le_rfl he'
_ < 12 * (ε / 12) := mul_lt_mul' le_rfl he (le_of_lt P) (by norm_num)
_ = ε := by field_simp [(by norm_num : (12 : ℝ) ≠ 0)]
-- As it is Cauchy, the sequence `L0` converges, to a limit `f'` in `K`.
obtain ⟨f', f'K, hf'⟩ : ∃ f' ∈ K, Tendsto L0 atTop (𝓝 f') :=
cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete hK (fun e => (hn e (n e) (n e) le_rfl le_rfl).1) this
have Lf' : ∀ e p, n e ≤ p → ‖L e (n e) p - f'‖ ≤ 12 * (1 / 2) ^ e := by
intro e p hp
apply le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.sub hf').norm
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨e, fun e' he' => M _ _ _ _ _ _ le_rfl hp le_rfl le_rfl he'⟩
-- Let us show that `f` has right derivative `f'` at `x`.
have : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
simp only [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff]
/- to get an approximation with a precision `ε`, we will replace `f` with `L e (n e) m` for
some large enough `e` (yielding a small error by uniform approximation). As one can vary `m`,
this makes it possible to cover all scales, and thus to obtain a good linear approximation in
the whole interval of length `(1/2)^(n e)`. -/
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ : ∃ e : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ e < ε / 16 :=
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (div_pos εpos (by norm_num)) (by norm_num)
filter_upwards [Icc_mem_nhdsGE <| show x < x + (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) by simp] with y hy
-- We need to show that `f y - f x - f' (y - x)` is small. For this, we will work at scale
-- `k` where `k` is chosen with `‖y - x‖ ∼ 2 ^ (-k)`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hy.1 with (rfl | xy)
· simp only [sub_self, zero_smul, norm_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
have yzero : 0 < y - x := sub_pos.2 xy
have y_le : y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := by linarith [hy.2]
have yone : y - x ≤ 1 := le_trans y_le (pow_le_one₀ (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
-- define the scale `k`.
obtain ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (1 / 2) ^ (k + 1) < y - x ∧ y - x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ k :=
exists_nat_pow_near_of_lt_one yzero yone (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2)
(by norm_num : (1 : ℝ) / 2 < 1)
-- the scale is large enough (as `y - x` is small enough)
have k_gt : n e < k := by
have : ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ (k + 1) < (1 / 2) ^ (n e + 1) := lt_of_lt_of_le hk y_le
rw [pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1 / 2) (by norm_num)] at this
omega
set m := k - 1
have m_ge : n e ≤ m := Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt k_gt
have km : k = m + 1 := (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) k_gt)).symm
rw [km] at hk h'k
-- `f` is well approximated by `L e (n e) k` at the relevant scale
-- (in fact, we use `m = k - 1` instead of `k` because of the precise definition of `A`).
have J : ‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ :=
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ m := by
apply le_of_mem_A (hn e (n e) m le_rfl m_ge).2.2
· simp only [one_div, inv_pow, left_mem_Icc, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
positivity
· simp only [pow_add, tsub_le_iff_left] at h'k
simpa only [hy.1, mem_Icc, true_and, one_div, pow_one] using h'k
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (1 / 2) ^ (m + 2) := by field_simp; ring
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * (y - x) := by gcongr
_ = 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ := by rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg yzero.le]
calc
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • f'‖ =
‖f y - f x - (y - x) • L e (n e) m + (y - x) • (L e (n e) m - f')‖ := by
simp only [smul_sub, sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ 4 * (1 / 2) ^ e * ‖y - x‖ + ‖y - x‖ * (12 * (1 / 2) ^ e) :=
norm_add_le_of_le J <| by rw [norm_smul]; gcongr; exact Lf' _ _ m_ge
_ = 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (1 / 2) ^ e := by ring
_ ≤ 16 * ‖y - x‖ * (ε / 16) := by gcongr
_ = ε * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
rw [← this.derivWithin (uniqueDiffOn_Ici x x Set.left_mem_Ici)] at f'K
exact ⟨this.differentiableWithinAt, f'K⟩
theorem differentiable_set_eq_D (hK : IsComplete K) :
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } = D f K :=
Subset.antisymm (differentiable_set_subset_D _) (D_subset_differentiable_set hK)
end RightDerivMeasurableAux
open RightDerivMeasurableAux
variable (f)
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function, with derivative in a given complete
set, is Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete {K : Set F} (hK : IsComplete K) :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ K } := by
-- simp [differentiable_set_eq_d K hK, D, measurableSet_b, MeasurableSet.iInter,
-- MeasurableSet.iUnion]
simp only [differentiable_set_eq_D K hK, D]
repeat apply_rules [MeasurableSet.iUnion, MeasurableSet.iInter] <;> intro
exact measurableSet_B
variable [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The set of right differentiability points of a function taking values in a complete space is
Borel-measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici :
MeasurableSet { x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } := by
have : IsComplete (univ : Set F) := complete_univ
convert measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete f this
simp
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem measurable_derivWithin_Ici [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] :
Measurable fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x := by
refine measurable_of_isClosed fun s hs => ?_
have :
(fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⁻¹' s =
{ x | DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x ∧ derivWithin f (Ici x) x ∈ s } ∪
{ x | ¬DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ici x) x } ∩ { _x | (0 : F) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun x => mem_preimage.trans derivWithin_mem_iff
rw [this]
exact
(measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici_of_isComplete _ hs.isComplete).union
((measurableSet_of_differentiableWithinAt_Ici _).compl.inter (MeasurableSet.const _))
theorem stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici :
StronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) := by
borelize F
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨measurable_derivWithin_Ici f, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_count, ht⟩ : ∃ t : Set ℝ, t.Countable ∧ Dense t := exists_countable_dense ℝ
suffices H : range (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) x) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
IsSeparable.mono (t_count.image f).isSeparable.span.closure H
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
suffices H' : range (fun y ↦ derivWithin f (Ici x) y) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span ℝ (f '' t)) from
H' (mem_range_self _)
apply range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
calc Ici x
= closure (Ioi x ∩ closure t) := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq.1 ht]
_ ⊆ closure (closure (Ioi x ∩ t)) := by
apply closure_mono
simpa [inter_comm] using (isOpen_Ioi (a := x)).closure_inter (s := t)
_ ⊆ closure (Ici x ∩ t) := by
rw [closure_closure]
exact closure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ Ioi_subset_Ici_self)
theorem aemeasurable_derivWithin_Ici [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F] (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) μ :=
| (measurable_derivWithin_Ici f).aemeasurable
theorem aestronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici (μ : Measure ℝ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => derivWithin f (Ici x) x) μ :=
(stronglyMeasurable_derivWithin_Ici f).aestronglyMeasurable
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Measurable.lean | 743 | 747 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShapeSigns
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalBicomplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# The total complex of a bicomplex
Given a preadditive category `C`, two complex shapes `c₁ : ComplexShape I₁`,
`c₂ : ComplexShape I₂`, a bicomplex `K : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂`,
and a third complex shape `c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂` equipped
with `[TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]`, we construct the total complex
`K.total c₁₂ : HomologicalComplex C c₁₂`.
In particular, if `c := ComplexShape.up ℤ` and `K : HomologicalComplex₂ c c`, then for any
`n : ℤ`, `(K.total c).X n` identifies to the coproduct of the `(K.X p).X q` such that
`p + q = n`, and the differential on `(K.total c).X n` is induced by the sum of horizontal
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X (p + 1)).X q` and `(-1) ^ p` times the vertical
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X p).X (q + 1)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
namespace HomologicalComplex₂
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
{I₁ I₂ I₁₂ : Type*} {c₁ : ComplexShape I₁} {c₂ : ComplexShape I₂}
(K L M : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂) (φ : K ⟶ L) (e : K ≅ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M)
(c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂) [TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]
/-- A bicomplex has a total bicomplex if for any `i₁₂ : I₁₂`, the coproduct
of the objects `(K.X i₁).X i₂` such that `ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂` exists. -/
abbrev HasTotal := K.toGradedObject.HasMap (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
include e in
variable {K L} in
lemma hasTotal_of_iso [K.HasTotal c₁₂] : L.HasTotal c₁₂ :=
GradedObject.hasMap_of_iso (GradedObject.isoMk K.toGradedObject L.toGradedObject
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ =>
(HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₁ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₂).mapIso e)) _
variable [DecidableEq I₁₂] [K.HasTotal c₁₂]
section
variable (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
/-- The horizontal differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₁ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ (c₁.next i₁)).f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨_, i₂⟩ i₁₂)
/-- The vertical differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₂ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ (c₂.next i₂) ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, _⟩ i₁₂)
lemma d₁_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₁]
rw [K.shape_f _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
lemma d₂_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₂]
rw [HomologicalComplex.shape _ _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
end
namespace totalAux
/-! Lemmas in the `totalAux` namespace should be used only in the internals of
the construction of the total complex `HomologicalComplex₂.total`. Once that
definition is done, similar lemmas shall be restated, but with
terms like `K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj` replaced by `K.ιTotal`. This is done in order
to prevent API leakage from definitions involving graded objects. -/
lemma d₁_eq' {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ i₁').f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ i₁₂) := by
obtain rfl := c₁.next_eq' h
rfl
lemma d₁_eq {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ i₁').f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ i₁₂ h') := by
rw [d₁_eq' K c₁₂ h i₂ i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq]
lemma d₂_eq' (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ i₂' ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ i₁₂) := by
obtain rfl := c₂.next_eq' h
rfl
lemma d₂_eq (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ i₂' ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ i₁₂ h') := by
rw [d₂_eq' K c₁₂ i₁ h i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq]
end totalAux
lemma d₁_eq_zero' {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ ≠ i₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
rw [totalAux.d₁_eq' K c₁₂ h i₂ i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq_zero, comp_zero, smul_zero]
exact h'
lemma d₂_eq_zero' (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ ≠ i₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
rw [totalAux.d₂_eq' K c₁₂ i₁ h i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq_zero, comp_zero, smul_zero]
exact h'
/-- The horizontal differential in the total complex. -/
noncomputable def D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂ ⟶
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂' :=
GradedObject.descMapObj _ (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ _ => K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂')
/-- The vertical differential in the total complex. -/
noncomputable def D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂ ⟶
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂' :=
GradedObject.descMapObj _ (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ _ => K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂')
namespace totalAux
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιMapObj_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i : I₁ × I₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i = i₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
K.d₁ c₁₂ i.1 i.2 i₁₂' := by
simp [D₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιMapObj_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i : I₁ × I₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i = i₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
K.d₂ c₁₂ i.1 i.2 i₁₂' := by
simp [D₂]
end totalAux
lemma D₁_shape (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (h₁₂ : ¬ c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂') : K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' = 0 := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁, comp_zero]
by_cases h₁ : c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero' c₁₂ h₁ i₂ i₁₂']
intro h₂
exact h₁₂ (by simpa only [← h, ← h₂] using ComplexShape.rel_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₁ i₂)
· exact d₁_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ h₁
lemma D₂_shape (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (h₁₂ : ¬ c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂') : K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' = 0 := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂, comp_zero]
by_cases h₂ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero' c₁₂ i₁ h₂ i₁₂']
intro h₁
exact h₁₂ (by simpa only [← h, ← h₁] using ComplexShape.rel_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₂)
· exact d₂_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ h₂
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma D₁_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) : K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = 0 := by
by_cases h₁ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂'
· by_cases h₂ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂' i₁₂''
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁_assoc, comp_zero]
by_cases h₃ : c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)
· rw [totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₃ i₂ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃ i₂, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁]
by_cases h₄ : c₁.Rel (c₁.next i₁) (c₁.next (c₁.next i₁))
· rw [totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₄ i₂ i₁₂'', Linear.comp_units_smul,
d_f_comp_d_f_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero, smul_zero]
rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₄, ← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃,
h, c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, c₁₂.next_eq' h₂]
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero _ _ _ _ h₄, comp_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₃, zero_comp]
· rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₂, comp_zero]
· rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma D₂_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) : K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = 0 := by
by_cases h₁ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂'
· by_cases h₂ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂' i₁₂''
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂_assoc, comp_zero]
by_cases h₃ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· rw [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ i₁ h₃ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₃, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂]
by_cases h₄ : c₂.Rel (c₂.next i₂) (c₂.next (c₂.next i₂))
· rw [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ i₁ h₄ i₁₂'', Linear.comp_units_smul,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero, smul_zero]
rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₄, ← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₃,
h, c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, c₁₂.next_eq' h₂]
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₄, comp_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₃, zero_comp]
· rw [K.D₂_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₂, comp_zero]
· rw [K.D₂_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma D₂_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) :
K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = - K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' := by
by_cases h₁ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂'
· by_cases h₂ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂' i₁₂''
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂_assoc, comp_neg, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁_assoc]
by_cases h₃ : c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)
· rw [totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₃ i₂ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃ i₂, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂]
by_cases h₄ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· have h₅ : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (i₁, c₂.next i₂) = i₁₂' := by
rw [← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, ← h, ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₄]
have h₆ : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (c₁.next i₁, c₂.next i₂) = i₁₂'' := by
rw [← c₁₂.next_eq' h₂, ← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃, h₅]
simp only [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ _ h₄ _ h₅, totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ _ h₄ _ h₆,
Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁, Linear.comp_units_smul,
totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₃ _ _ h₆, HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm_assoc, smul_smul,
ComplexShape.ε₂_ε₁ c₁₂ h₃ h₄, neg_mul, Units.neg_smul]
· simp only [K.d₂_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₄, zero_comp, comp_zero, smul_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₃, zero_comp, neg_zero]
by_cases h₄ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· rw [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ i₁ h₄ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₄, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁]
rw [K.d₁_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₃, comp_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₄, zero_comp]
· rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₂, K.D₂_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₂, comp_zero, comp_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁, K.D₂_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁, zero_comp, zero_comp, neg_zero]
@[reassoc]
lemma D₁_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) :
K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = - K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' := by simp
/-- The total complex of a bicomplex. -/
@[simps -isSimp d]
noncomputable def total : HomologicalComplex C c₁₂ where
X := K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
d i₁₂ i₁₂' := K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' + K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂'
shape i₁₂ i₁₂' h₁₂ := by
rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁₂, K.D₂_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁₂, zero_add]
/-- The inclusion of a summand in the total complex. -/
noncomputable def ιTotal (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (i₁, i₂) = i₁₂) :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.total c₁₂).X i₁₂ :=
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ i₁₂ h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XXIsoOfEq_hom_ιTotal {x₁ y₁ : I₁} (h₁ : x₁ = y₁) {x₂ y₂ : I₂} (h₂ : x₂ = y₂)
(i₁₂ : I₁₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (y₁, y₂) = i₁₂) :
(K.XXIsoOfEq _ _ _ h₁ h₂).hom ≫ K.ιTotal c₁₂ y₁ y₂ i₁₂ h =
K.ιTotal c₁₂ x₁ x₂ i₁₂ (by rw [h₁, h₂, h]) := by
subst h₁ h₂
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XXIsoOfEq_inv_ιTotal {x₁ y₁ : I₁} (h₁ : x₁ = y₁) {x₂ y₂ : I₂} (h₂ : x₂ = y₂)
(i₁₂ : I₁₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (x₁, x₂) = i₁₂) :
(K.XXIsoOfEq _ _ _ h₁ h₂).inv ≫ K.ιTotal c₁₂ x₁ x₂ i₁₂ h =
K.ιTotal c₁₂ y₁ y₂ i₁₂ (by rw [← h, h₁, h₂]) := by
subst h₁ h₂
simp
/-- The inclusion of a summand in the total complex, or zero if the degrees do not match. -/
noncomputable def ιTotalOrZero (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.total c₁₂).X i₁₂ :=
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ i₁₂
lemma ιTotalOrZero_eq (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (i₁, i₂) = i₁₂) :
K.ιTotalOrZero c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = K.ιTotal c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h := dif_pos h
lemma ιTotalOrZero_eq_zero (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (i₁, i₂) ≠ i₁₂) :
K.ιTotalOrZero c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := dif_neg h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.ιTotal c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂' := by
| apply totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ι_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂)
(h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.ιTotal c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/TotalComplex.lean | 295 | 300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric IsLocalRing
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt : Type := {x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1}
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
variable {p} {x y : ℤ_[p]}
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by norm_num
one_mem' := by norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one₀ hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
variable {p}
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (subring p)
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
lemma coe_ne_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := by simp
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h :=
Nat.cast_injective (R := ℚ_[p]) (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by simp
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p)
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℤ_[p] := IsUltrametricDist.subtype _
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p} in
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] where
__ := instCommRing
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ rfl
norm_mul_le := by simp [norm_def]
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance : NormMulClass ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun x y ↦ by simp [norm_def]⟩
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
variable {p}
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
@[simp]
theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
theorem norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_padic_norm {q : ℚ_[p]} (hq : ‖q‖ ≤ 1) : @norm ℤ_[p] _ ⟨q, hq⟩ = ‖q‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := padicNormE.norm_p
theorem norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by simp
private def cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq (f : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm) : CauSeq ℚ_[p] fun a => ‖a‖ :=
⟨fun n => f n, fun _ hε => by simpa [norm, norm_def] using f.cauchy hε⟩
variable (p)
instance complete : CauSeq.IsComplete ℤ_[p] norm :=
⟨fun f =>
have hqn : ‖CauSeq.lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f)‖ ≤ 1 :=
padicNormE_lim_le zero_lt_one fun _ => norm_le_one _
⟨⟨_, hqn⟩, fun ε => by
simpa [norm, norm_def] using CauSeq.equiv_lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f) ε⟩⟩
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℝ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹
use k
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ hε (zpow_pos _ _)]
· rw [zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hk
norm_cast
apply le_of_lt
convert Nat.lt_pow_self _ using 1
exact hp.1.one_lt
· exact mod_cast hp.1.pos
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt_rat {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := @exists_pow_neg_lt p _ ε (mod_cast hε)
use k
rw [show (p : ℝ) = (p : ℚ) by simp] at hk
exact mod_cast hk
variable {p}
theorem norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k by rwa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd k
theorem norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd {k : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k by
simpa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd _ _
/-! ### Valuation on `ℤ_[p]` -/
lemma valuation_coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
have := x.2
rwa [Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx, zpow_le_one_iff_right₀, neg_nonpos]
at this
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
/-- `PadicInt.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` to `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) : ℕ := (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation.toNat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma valuation_coe (x : ℤ_[p]) : (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation = x.valuation := by
simp [valuation, valuation_coe_nonneg]
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℤ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [valuation]
lemma le_valuation_add (hxy : x + y ≠ 0) : min x.valuation y.valuation ≤ (x + y).valuation := by
zify; simpa [← valuation_coe] using Padic.le_valuation_add <| coe_ne_zero.2 hxy
@[simp] lemma valuation_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).valuation = x.valuation + y.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe, Padic.valuation_mul (coe_ne_zero.2 hx) (coe_ne_zero.2 hy)]
@[simp]
lemma valuation_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ n).valuation = n * x.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe]
lemma norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖x‖ = p ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ) := by
simp [norm_def, Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
-- TODO: Do we really need this lemma?
@[simp]
theorem valuation_p_pow_mul (n : ℕ) (c : ℤ_[p]) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
((p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n * c).valuation = n + c.valuation := by
rw [valuation_mul (NeZero.ne _) hc, valuation_pow, valuation_p, mul_one]
section Units
/-! ### Units of `ℤ_[p]` -/
theorem mul_inv : ∀ {z : ℤ_[p]}, ‖z‖ = 1 → z * z.inv = 1
| ⟨k, _⟩, h => by
have hk : k ≠ 0 := fun h' => zero_ne_one' ℚ_[p] (by simp [h'] at h)
unfold PadicInt.inv
rw [norm_eq_padic_norm] at h
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos h]
apply Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ hk]
theorem inv_mul {z : ℤ_[p]} (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z.inv * z = 1 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_inv hz]
theorem isUnit_iff {z : ℤ_[p]} : IsUnit z ↔ ‖z‖ = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h with ⟨w, eq⟩
refine le_antisymm (norm_le_one _) ?_
have := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_le_one w) (norm_nonneg z)
rwa [mul_one, ← norm_mul, ← eq, norm_one] at this, fun h =>
⟨⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem norm_lt_one_add {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz1 : ‖z1‖ < 1) (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 + z2‖ < 1 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (nonarchimedean _ _) (max_lt hz1 hz2)
theorem norm_lt_one_mul {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (hz2 : ‖z2‖ < 1) : ‖z1 * z2‖ < 1 :=
calc
‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ := by simp
_ < 1 := mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_right (norm_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _) hz2
theorem mem_nonunits {z : ℤ_[p]} : z ∈ nonunits ℤ_[p] ↔ ‖z‖ < 1 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp [norm_le_one z, nonunits, isUnit_iff]
theorem not_isUnit_iff {z : ℤ_[p]} : ¬IsUnit z ↔ ‖z‖ < 1 := by
simpa using mem_nonunits
/-- A `p`-adic number `u` with `‖u‖ = 1` is a unit of `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def mkUnits {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let z : ℤ_[p] := ⟨u, le_of_eq h⟩
⟨z, z.inv, mul_inv h, inv_mul h⟩
@[simp]
theorem mkUnits_eq {u : ℚ_[p]} (h : ‖u‖ = 1) : ((mkUnits h : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = u := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_units (u : ℤ_[p]ˣ) : ‖(u : ℤ_[p])‖ = 1 := isUnit_iff.mp <| by simp
/-- `unitCoeff hx` is the unit `u` in the unique representation `x = u * p ^ n`.
See `unitCoeff_spec`. -/
def unitCoeff {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ℤ_[p]ˣ :=
let u : ℚ_[p] := x * (p : ℚ_[p]) ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ)
have hu : ‖u‖ = 1 := by
simp [u, hx, pow_ne_zero _ (NeZero.ne _), norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation]
mkUnits hu
@[simp]
theorem unitCoeff_coe {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(unitCoeff hx : ℚ_[p]) = x * (p : ℚ_[p]) ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ) := rfl
theorem unitCoeff_spec {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
x = (unitCoeff hx : ℤ_[p]) * (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ x.valuation := by
apply Subtype.coe_injective
push_cast
rw [unitCoeff_coe, mul_assoc, ← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_add₀]
· simp
· exact NeZero.ne _
end Units
section NormLeIff
/-! ### Various characterizations of open unit balls -/
theorem norm_le_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
‖x‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ n ≤ x.valuation := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hx, zpow_le_zpow_iff_right₀, neg_le_neg_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
theorem mem_span_pow_iff_le_valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) (hx : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
| x ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) ↔ n ≤ x.valuation := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 384 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
/-!
# zip & unzip
This file provides results about `List.zipWith`, `List.zip` and `List.unzip` (definitions are in
core Lean).
`zipWith f l₁ l₂` applies `f : α → β → γ` pointwise to a list `l₁ : List α` and `l₂ : List β`. It
applies, until one of the lists is exhausted. For example,
`zipWith f [0, 1, 2] [6.28, 31] = [f 0 6.28, f 1 31]`.
`zip` is `zipWith` applied to `Prod.mk`. For example,
`zip [a₁, a₂] [b₁, b₂, b₃] = [(a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂)]`.
`unzip` undoes `zip`. For example, `unzip [(a₁, b₁), (a₂, b₂)] = ([a₁, a₂], [b₁, b₂])`.
-/
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β γ δ ε : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), (zip l₁ l₂).map Prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [], _ => zip_nil_right.symm
| l₁, [] => by rw [zip_nil_right]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
theorem forall_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ = length l₂ →
(Forall p (zipWith f l₁ l₂) ↔ Forall₂ (fun x y => p (f x y)) l₁ l₂)
| [], [], _ => by simp
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [length_cons, succ_inj] at h
simp [forall_zipWith h]
theorem unzip_swap (l : List (α × β)) : unzip (l.map Prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap := by
simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]
rfl
@[congr]
theorem zipWith_congr (f g : α → β → γ) (la : List α) (lb : List β)
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun a b => f a b = g a b) la lb) : zipWith f la lb = zipWith g la lb := by
induction h with
| nil => rfl
| cons hfg _ ih => exact congr_arg₂ _ hfg ih
theorem zipWith_zipWith_left (f : δ → γ → ε) (g : α → β → δ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β) (lc : List γ),
zipWith f (zipWith g la lb) lc = zipWith3 (fun a b c => f (g a b) c) la lb lc
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs, _ :: cs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith_zipWith_left f g as bs cs
theorem zipWith_zipWith_right (f : α → δ → ε) (g : β → γ → δ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β) (lc : List γ),
zipWith f la (zipWith g lb lc) = zipWith3 (fun a b c => f a (g b c)) la lb lc
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs, _ :: cs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith_zipWith_right f g as bs cs
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_left (f : α → α → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la la lb = zipWith (fun a b => f a a b) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_left f as bs
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_mid (f : α → β → α → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la lb la = zipWith (fun a b => f a b a) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_mid f as bs
@[simp]
theorem zipWith3_same_right (f : α → β → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith3 f la lb lb = zipWith (fun a b => f a b b) la lb
| [], _ => rfl
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg (cons _) <| zipWith3_same_right f as bs
instance (f : α → α → β) [IsSymmOp f] : IsSymmOp (zipWith f) :=
⟨fun _ _ => zipWith_comm_of_comm IsSymmOp.symm_op⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_revzip (l : List α) : length (revzip l) = length l := by
simp only [revzip, length_zip, length_reverse, min_self]
@[simp]
theorem unzip_revzip (l : List α) : (revzip l).unzip = (l, l.reverse) :=
unzip_zip length_reverse.symm
@[simp]
theorem revzip_map_fst (l : List α) : (revzip l).map Prod.fst = l := by
rw [← unzip_fst, unzip_revzip]
@[simp]
theorem revzip_map_snd (l : List α) : (revzip l).map Prod.snd = l.reverse := by
rw [← unzip_snd, unzip_revzip]
theorem reverse_revzip (l : List α) : reverse l.revzip = revzip l.reverse := by
rw [← zip_unzip (revzip l).reverse]
simp [unzip_eq_map, revzip, map_reverse, map_fst_zip, map_snd_zip]
theorem revzip_swap (l : List α) : (revzip l).map Prod.swap = revzip l.reverse := by simp [revzip]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias get?_zipWith' := getElem?_zipWith'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias get?_zipWith_eq_some := getElem?_zipWith_eq_some
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias get?_zip_eq_some := getElem?_zip_eq_some
theorem mem_zip_inits_tails {l : List α} {init tail : List α} :
(init, tail) ∈ zip l.inits l.tails ↔ init ++ tail = l := by
induction' l with hd tl ih generalizing init tail <;> simp_rw [tails, inits, zip_cons_cons]
· simp
· constructor <;> rw [mem_cons, zip_map_left, mem_map, Prod.exists]
· rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩)
· simp
· simp [ih.mp h]
· rcases init with - | ⟨hd', tl'⟩
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
right
use tl', tail
simp_all
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Zip.lean | 235 | 236 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Products (respectively, sums) over a finset or a multiset.
The regular `Finset.prod` and `Multiset.prod` require `[CommMonoid α]`.
Often, there are collections `s : Finset α` where `[Monoid α]` and we know,
in a dependent fashion, that for all the terms `∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Commute x y`.
This allows to still have a well-defined product over `s`.
## Main definitions
- `Finset.noncommProd`, requiring a proof of commutativity of held terms
- `Multiset.noncommProd`, requiring a proof of commutativity of held terms
## Implementation details
While `List.prod` is defined via `List.foldl`, `noncommProd` is defined via
`Multiset.foldr` for neater proofs and definitions. By the commutativity assumption,
the two must be equal.
TODO: Tidy up this file by using the fact that the submonoid generated by commuting
elements is commutative and using the `Finset.prod` versions of lemmas to prove the `noncommProd`
version.
-/
variable {F ι α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → β) (op : α → α → α)
namespace Multiset
/-- Fold of a `s : Multiset α` with `f : α → β → β`, given a proof that `LeftCommutative f`
on all elements `x ∈ s`. -/
def noncommFoldr (s : Multiset α)
(comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b)) (b : β) : β :=
letI : LeftCommutative (α := { x // x ∈ s }) (f ∘ Subtype.val) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
haveI : IsRefl α fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b) := ⟨fun _ _ => rfl⟩
comm.of_refl hx hy⟩
s.attach.foldr (f ∘ Subtype.val) b
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_coe (l : List α) (comm) (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (l : Multiset α) comm b = l.foldr f b := by
simp only [noncommFoldr, coe_foldr, coe_attach, List.attach, List.attachWith, Function.comp_def]
rw [← List.foldr_map]
simp [List.map_pmap]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_empty (h) (b : β) : noncommFoldr f (0 : Multiset α) h b = b :=
rfl
theorem noncommFoldr_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (h h') (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (a ::ₘ s) h b = f a (noncommFoldr f s h' b) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
theorem noncommFoldr_eq_foldr (s : Multiset α) [h : LeftCommutative f] (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f s (fun x _ y _ _ => h.left_comm x y) b = foldr f b s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
section assoc
variable [assoc : Std.Associative op]
/-- Fold of a `s : Multiset α` with an associative `op : α → α → α`, given a proofs that `op`
is commutative on all elements `x ∈ s`. -/
def noncommFold (s : Multiset α) (comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => op x y = op y x) :
α → α :=
noncommFoldr op s fun x hx y hy h b => by rw [← assoc.assoc, comm hx hy h, assoc.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFold_coe (l : List α) (comm) (a : α) :
noncommFold op (l : Multiset α) comm a = l.foldr op a := by simp [noncommFold]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFold_empty (h) (a : α) : noncommFold op (0 : Multiset α) h a = a :=
rfl
theorem noncommFold_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (h h') (x : α) :
noncommFold op (a ::ₘ s) h x = op a (noncommFold op s h' x) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
theorem noncommFold_eq_fold (s : Multiset α) [Std.Commutative op] (a : α) :
noncommFold op s (fun x _ y _ _ => Std.Commutative.comm x y) a = fold op a s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
end assoc
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β]
/-- Product of a `s : Multiset α` with `[Monoid α]`, given a proof that `*` commutes
on all elements `x ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Sum of a `s : Multiset α` with `[AddMonoid α]`, given a proof that `+` commutes
on all elements `x ∈ s`."]
def noncommProd (s : Multiset α) (comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise Commute) : α :=
s.noncommFold (· * ·) comm 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_coe (l : List α) (comm) : noncommProd (l : Multiset α) comm = l.prod := by
rw [noncommProd]
simp only [noncommFold_coe]
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· rw [List.prod_cons, List.foldr, hl]
intro x hx y hy
exact comm (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx) (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hy)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_empty (h) : noncommProd (0 : Multiset α) h = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (comm) :
noncommProd (a ::ₘ s) comm = a * noncommProd s (comm.mono fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_cons' (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (comm) :
noncommProd (a ::ₘ s) comm = noncommProd s (comm.mono fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem) * a := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with s
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, cons_coe, noncommProd_coe, List.prod_cons]
induction' s with hd tl IH
· simp
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_assoc, ← IH, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]
· congr 1
apply comm.of_refl <;> simp
· intro x hx y hy
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, List.mem_cons, mem_coe, cons_coe] at hx hy
apply comm
· cases hx <;> simp [*]
· cases hy <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_add (s t : Multiset α) (comm) :
noncommProd (s + t) comm =
noncommProd s (comm.mono <| subset_of_le <| s.le_add_right t) *
noncommProd t (comm.mono <| subset_of_le <| t.le_add_left s) := by
rcases s with ⟨⟩
rcases t with ⟨⟩
simp
@[to_additive]
lemma noncommProd_induction (s : Multiset α) (comm)
(p : α → Prop) (hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
p (s.noncommProd comm) := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, noncommProd_coe, mem_coe] at base ⊢
exact l.prod_induction p hom unit base
variable [FunLike F α β]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_noncommProd_aux [MulHomClass F α β] (s : Multiset α)
(comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise Commute) (f : F) : { x | x ∈ s.map f }.Pairwise Commute := by
simp only [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ _
exact (comm.of_refl hx hy).map f
@[to_additive]
theorem map_noncommProd [MonoidHomClass F α β] (s : Multiset α) (comm) (f : F) :
f (s.noncommProd comm) = (s.map f).noncommProd (Multiset.map_noncommProd_aux s comm f) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simpa using map_list_prod f _
@[to_additive noncommSum_eq_card_nsmul]
theorem noncommProd_eq_pow_card (s : Multiset α) (comm) (m : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, x = m) :
s.noncommProd comm = m ^ Multiset.card s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, noncommProd_coe, coe_card, mem_coe] at *
exact List.prod_eq_pow_card _ m h
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_eq_prod {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] (s : Multiset α) :
(noncommProd s fun _ _ _ _ _ => Commute.all _ _) = prod s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_commute (s : Multiset α) (comm) (y : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, Commute y x) :
Commute y (s.noncommProd comm) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, noncommProd_coe]
exact Commute.list_prod_right _ _ h
theorem mul_noncommProd_erase [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (comm)
(comm' := fun _ hx _ hy hxy ↦ comm (s.mem_of_mem_erase hx) (s.mem_of_mem_erase hy) hxy) :
a * (s.erase a).noncommProd comm' = s.noncommProd comm := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, mem_coe, coe_erase, noncommProd_coe] at comm h ⊢
suffices ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x * y = y * x by rw [List.prod_erase_of_comm h this]
intro x hx y hy
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | hxy
· rfl
exact comm hx hy hxy
theorem noncommProd_erase_mul [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (comm)
(comm' := fun _ hx _ hy hxy ↦ comm (s.mem_of_mem_erase hx) (s.mem_of_mem_erase hy) hxy) :
(s.erase a).noncommProd comm' * a = s.noncommProd comm := by
suffices ∀ b ∈ erase s a, Commute a b by
rw [← (noncommProd_commute (s.erase a) comm' a this).eq, mul_noncommProd_erase s h comm comm']
intro b hb
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | hab
· rfl
exact comm h (mem_of_mem_erase hb) hab
end Multiset
namespace Finset
variable [Monoid β] [Monoid γ]
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- Proof used in definition of `Finset.noncommProd` -/
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_lemma (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(comm : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)) :
Set.Pairwise { x | x ∈ Multiset.map f s.val } Commute := by
simp_rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _
exact comm.of_refl ha hb
/-- Product of a `s : Finset α` mapped with `f : α → β` with `[Monoid β]`,
given a proof that `*` commutes on all elements `f x` for `x ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Sum of a `s : Finset α` mapped with `f : α → β` with `[AddMonoid β]`,
given a proof that `+` commutes on all elements `f x` for `x ∈ s`."]
def noncommProd (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(comm : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)) : β :=
(s.1.map f).noncommProd <| noncommProd_lemma s f comm
@[to_additive]
lemma noncommProd_induction (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) (comm)
(p : β → Prop) (hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :
p (s.noncommProd f comm) := by
refine Multiset.noncommProd_induction _ _ _ hom unit fun b hb ↦ ?_
obtain (⟨a, ha : a ∈ s, rfl : f a = b⟩) := by simpa using hb
exact base a ha
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem noncommProd_congr {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : s₁ = s₂)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) (comm) :
noncommProd s₁ f comm =
noncommProd s₂ g fun x hx y hy h => by
dsimp only [Function.onFun]
rw [← h₂ _ hx, ← h₂ _ hy]
subst h₁
exact comm hx hy h := by
simp_rw [noncommProd, Multiset.map_congr (congr_arg _ h₁) h₂]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (f : α → β) (comm) (hl : l.Nodup) :
noncommProd l.toFinset f comm = (l.map f).prod := by
rw [← List.dedup_eq_self] at hl
simp [noncommProd, hl]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_empty (f : α → β) (h) : noncommProd (∅ : Finset α) f h = 1 :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_cons (s : Finset α) (a : α) (f : α → β)
(ha : a ∉ s) (comm) :
noncommProd (cons a s ha) f comm =
f a * noncommProd s f (comm.mono fun _ => Finset.mem_cons.2 ∘ .inr) := by
simp_rw [noncommProd, Finset.cons_val, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.noncommProd_cons]
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_cons' (s : Finset α) (a : α) (f : α → β)
(ha : a ∉ s) (comm) :
noncommProd (cons a s ha) f comm =
noncommProd s f (comm.mono fun _ => Finset.mem_cons.2 ∘ .inr) * f a := by
simp_rw [noncommProd, Finset.cons_val, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.noncommProd_cons']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (f : α → β) (comm)
(ha : a ∉ s) :
noncommProd (insert a s) f comm =
f a * noncommProd s f (comm.mono fun _ => mem_insert_of_mem) := by
simp only [← cons_eq_insert _ _ ha, noncommProd_cons]
@[to_additive]
theorem noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (f : α → β) (comm)
(ha : a ∉ s) :
noncommProd (insert a s) f comm =
noncommProd s f (comm.mono fun _ => mem_insert_of_mem) * f a := by
simp only [← cons_eq_insert _ _ ha, noncommProd_cons']
|
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem noncommProd_singleton (a : α) (f : α → β) :
noncommProd ({a} : Finset α) f
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NoncommProd.lean | 301 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Transfer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Schreier's Lemma
In this file we prove Schreier's lemma.
## Main results
- `closure_mul_image_eq` : **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a right_transversal
of `H : Subgroup G` with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`,
then `H` is generated by the `Set` `(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`.
- `fg_of_index_ne_zero` : **Schreier's Lemma**: A finite index subgroup of a finitely generated
group is finitely generated.
- `card_commutator_le_of_finite_commutatorSet`: A theorem of Schur: The size of the commutator
subgroup is bounded in terms of the number of commutators.
-/
open scoped Finset Pointwise
section CommGroup
open Subgroup
variable (G : Type*) [CommGroup G] [Group.FG G]
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank : Nat.card G ∣ Monoid.exponent G ^ Group.rank G := by
classical
obtain ⟨S, hS1, hS2⟩ := Group.rank_spec G
rw [← hS1, ← Fintype.card_coe, ← Finset.card_univ, ← Finset.prod_const]
let f : (∀ g : S, zpowers (g : G)) →* G := noncommPiCoprod fun s t _ x y _ _ => mul_comm x _
have hf : Function.Surjective f := by
rw [← MonoidHom.range_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← hS2, closure_le]
exact fun g hg => ⟨Pi.mulSingle ⟨g, hg⟩ ⟨g, mem_zpowers g⟩, noncommPiCoprod_mulSingle _ _⟩
replace hf := card_dvd_of_surjective f hf
rw [Nat.card_pi] at hf
refine hf.trans (Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd _ _ fun g _ => ?_)
rw [Nat.card_zpowers]
exact Monoid.order_dvd_exponent (g : G)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank' {n : ℕ} (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
Nat.card G ∣ n ^ Group.rank G :=
(card_dvd_exponent_pow_rank G).trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (Monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one hG) (Group.rank G))
end CommGroup
namespace Subgroup
open MemRightTransversals
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {H : Subgroup G} {R S : Set G}
theorem closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top
(hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R) (hS : closure S = ⊤) :
(closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹)) * R = ⊤ := by
let f : G → R := hR.toRightFun
let U : Set G := (R * S).image fun g => g * (f g : G)⁻¹
change (closure U : Set G) * R = ⊤
refine top_le_iff.mp fun g _ => ?_
refine closure_induction_right ?_ ?_ ?_ (eq_top_iff.mp hS (mem_top g))
· exact ⟨1, (closure U).one_mem, 1, hR1, one_mul 1⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s = u * (r * s * (f (r * s) : G)⁻¹) * f (r * s) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ?_) (f (r * s)).coe_prop
exact subset_closure ⟨r * s, Set.mul_mem_mul hr hs, rfl⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s⁻¹ = u * (f (r * s⁻¹) * s * r⁻¹)⁻¹ * f (r * s⁻¹) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ((closure U).inv_mem ?_)) (f (r * s⁻¹)).2
refine subset_closure ⟨f (r * s⁻¹) * s, Set.mul_mem_mul (f (r * s⁻¹)).2 hs, ?_⟩
rw [mul_right_inj, inv_inj, ← Subtype.coe_mk r hr, ← Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR (f (r * s⁻¹) * s)).unique
(hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem (f (r * s⁻¹) * s))
rw [mul_assoc, ← inv_inv s, ← mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
exact hR.toRightFun_mul_inv_mem (r * s⁻¹)
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a `rightTransversal` of `H : Subgroup G`
with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`, then `H` is generated by the `Set`
`(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`. -/
theorem closure_mul_image_eq (hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹) = H := by
have hU : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹) ≤ H := by
rw [closure_le]
rintro - ⟨g, -, rfl⟩
exact hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem g
refine le_antisymm hU fun h hh => ?_
| obtain ⟨g, hg, r, hr, rfl⟩ :=
show h ∈ _ from eq_top_iff.mp (closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top hR hR1 hS) (mem_top h)
suffices (⟨r, hr⟩ : R) = (⟨1, hR1⟩ : R) by
simpa only [show r = 1 from Subtype.ext_iff.mp this, mul_one]
apply (isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR r).unique
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, mul_inv_cancel]
exact H.one_mem
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, inv_one, mul_one]
exact (H.mul_mem_cancel_left (hU hg)).mp hh
/-- **Schreier's Lemma**: If `R : Set G` is a `rightTransversal` of `H : Subgroup G`
with `1 ∈ R`, and if `G` is generated by `S : Set G`, then `H` is generated by the `Set`
`(R * S).image (fun g ↦ g * (hR.toRightFun g)⁻¹)`. -/
theorem closure_mul_image_eq_top (hR : IsComplement H R) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g =>
⟨g * (hR.toRightFun g : G)⁻¹, hR.mul_inv_toRightFun_mem g⟩ : Set H) = ⊤ := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Schreier.lean | 98 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
/-!
# Lists with no duplicates
`List.Nodup` is defined in `Data/List/Basic`. In this file we prove various properties of this
predicate.
-/
universe u v
open Function
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α}
namespace List
protected theorem Pairwise.nodup {l : List α} {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] (h : Pairwise r l) :
Nodup l :=
h.imp ne_of_irrefl
open scoped Relator in
theorem rel_nodup {r : α → β → Prop} (hr : Relator.BiUnique r) : (Forall₂ r ⇒ (· ↔ ·)) Nodup Nodup
| _, _, Forall₂.nil => by simp only [nodup_nil]
| _, _, Forall₂.cons hab h => by
simpa only [nodup_cons] using
Relator.rel_and (Relator.rel_not (rel_mem hr hab h)) (rel_nodup hr h)
protected theorem Nodup.cons (ha : a ∉ l) (hl : Nodup l) : Nodup (a :: l) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨ha, hl⟩
theorem nodup_singleton (a : α) : Nodup [a] :=
pairwise_singleton _ _
theorem Nodup.of_cons (h : Nodup (a :: l)) : Nodup l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem Nodup.not_mem (h : (a :: l).Nodup) : a ∉ l :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem not_nodup_cons_of_mem : a ∈ l → ¬Nodup (a :: l) :=
imp_not_comm.1 Nodup.not_mem
theorem not_nodup_pair (a : α) : ¬Nodup [a, a] :=
not_nodup_cons_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
theorem nodup_iff_sublist {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, ¬[a, a] <+ l :=
⟨fun d a h => not_nodup_pair a (d.sublist h),
by
induction l <;> intro h; · exact nodup_nil
case cons a l IH =>
exact (IH fun a s => h a <| sublist_cons_of_sublist _ s).cons
fun al => h a <| (singleton_sublist.2 al).cons_cons _⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_mergeSort {l : List α} {le : α → α → Bool} : (l.mergeSort le).Nodup ↔ l.Nodup :=
(mergeSort_perm l le).nodup_iff
protected alias ⟨_, Nodup.mergeSort⟩ := nodup_mergeSort
theorem nodup_iff_injective_getElem {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ Function.Injective (fun i : Fin l.length => l[i.1]) :=
pairwise_iff_getElem.trans
⟨fun h i j hg => by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := i; obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := j
rcases lt_trichotomy i j with (hij | rfl | hji)
· exact (h i j hi hj hij hg).elim
· rfl
· exact (h j i hj hi hji hg.symm).elim,
fun hinj i j hi hj hij h => Nat.ne_of_lt hij (Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hinj ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h))⟩
theorem nodup_iff_injective_get {l : List α} :
Nodup l ↔ Function.Injective l.get := by
rw [nodup_iff_injective_getElem]
change _ ↔ Injective (fun i => l.get i)
simp
theorem Nodup.get_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) {i j : Fin l.length} :
l.get i = l.get j ↔ i = j :=
(nodup_iff_injective_get.1 h).eq_iff
theorem Nodup.getElem_inj_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l)
{i : Nat} {hi : i < l.length} {j : Nat} {hj : j < l.length} :
l[i] = l[j] ↔ i = j := by
have := @Nodup.get_inj_iff _ _ h ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
simpa
theorem nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem? {l : List α} :
l.Nodup ↔ ∀ i j : ℕ, i < j → j < l.length → l[i]? ≠ l[j]? := by
rw [Nodup, pairwise_iff_getElem]
constructor
· intro h i j hij hj
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem (lt_trans hij hj), getElem?_eq_getElem hj, Ne, Option.some_inj]
exact h _ _ (by omega) hj hij
· intro h i j hi hj hij
rw [Ne, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem]
exact h i j hij hj
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem? (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem nodup_iff_get?_ne_get? {l : List α} :
l.Nodup ↔ ∀ i j : ℕ, i < j → j < l.length → l.get? i ≠ l.get? j := by
simp [nodup_iff_getElem?_ne_getElem?]
theorem Nodup.ne_singleton_iff {l : List α} (h : Nodup l) (x : α) :
l ≠ [x] ↔ l = [] ∨ ∃ y ∈ l, y ≠ x := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
specialize hl h.of_cons
by_cases hx : tl = [x]
· simpa [hx, and_comm, and_or_left] using h
· rw [← Ne, hl] at hx
rcases hx with (rfl | ⟨y, hy, hx⟩)
· simp
· suffices ∃ y ∈ hd :: tl, y ≠ x by simpa [ne_nil_of_mem hy]
exact ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem _ hy, hx⟩
theorem not_nodup_of_get_eq_of_ne (xs : List α) (n m : Fin xs.length)
(h : xs.get n = xs.get m) (hne : n ≠ m) : ¬Nodup xs := by
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get]
exact fun hinj => hne (hinj h)
theorem idxOf_getElem [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (H : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.length) :
idxOf l[i] l = i :=
suffices (⟨idxOf l[i] l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 (getElem_mem _)⟩ : Fin l.length) = ⟨i, h⟩
from Fin.val_eq_of_eq this
nodup_iff_injective_get.1 H (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_getElem := idxOf_getElem
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `idxOf_get`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem get_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (H : Nodup l) (i : Fin l.length) :
idxOf (get l i) l = i := by
simp [idxOf_getElem, H]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias get_indexOf := get_idxOf
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a, count a l ≤ 1 :=
nodup_iff_sublist.trans <|
forall_congr' fun a =>
have : replicate 2 a <+ l ↔ 1 < count a l := (le_count_iff_replicate_sublist ..).symm
(not_congr this).trans not_lt
theorem nodup_iff_count_eq_one [DecidableEq α] : Nodup l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, count a l = 1 :=
nodup_iff_count_le_one.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun H h => H.antisymm (count_pos_iff.mpr h),
fun H => if h : _ then (H h).le else (count_eq_zero.mpr h).trans_le (Nat.zero_le 1)⟩
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) (h : a ∈ l) :
count a l = 1 :=
_root_.le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (count_pos_iff.2 h))
theorem count_eq_of_nodup [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
count a l = if a ∈ l then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_eq_one_of_mem d h
· exact count_eq_zero_of_not_mem h
theorem Nodup.of_append_left : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂)
theorem Nodup.of_append_right : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) → Nodup l₂ :=
Nodup.sublist (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂)
theorem nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup l₁ ∧ Nodup l₂ ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_append, disjoint_iff_ne]
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (d : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(nodup_append.1 d).2.2
theorem Nodup.append (d₁ : Nodup l₁) (d₂ : Nodup l₂) (dj : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) :=
nodup_append.2 ⟨d₁, d₂, dj⟩
theorem nodup_append_comm {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Nodup (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Nodup (l₂ ++ l₁) := by
simp only [nodup_append, and_left_comm, disjoint_comm]
theorem nodup_middle {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Nodup (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) ↔ Nodup (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) := by
simp only [nodup_append, not_or, and_left_comm, and_assoc, nodup_cons, mem_append,
disjoint_cons_right]
theorem Nodup.of_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} : Nodup (map f l) → Nodup l :=
(Pairwise.of_map f) fun _ _ => mt <| congr_arg f
theorem Nodup.map_on {f : α → β} (H : ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y) (d : Nodup l) :
(map f l).Nodup :=
Pairwise.map _ (fun a b ⟨ma, mb, n⟩ e => n (H a ma b mb e)) (Pairwise.and_mem.1 d)
theorem inj_on_of_nodup_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup (map f l)) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → f x = f y → x = y := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp only [map, nodup_cons, mem_map, not_exists, not_and, ← Ne.eq_def] at d
simp only [mem_cons]
rintro _ (rfl | h₁) _ (rfl | h₂) h₃
· rfl
· apply (d.1 _ h₂ h₃.symm).elim
· apply (d.1 _ h₁ h₃).elim
· apply ih d.2 h₁ h₂ h₃
theorem nodup_map_iff_inj_on {f : α → β} {l : List α} (d : Nodup l) :
Nodup (map f l) ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, f x = f y → x = y :=
⟨inj_on_of_nodup_map, fun h => d.map_on h⟩
protected theorem Nodup.map {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup l → Nodup (map f l) :=
Nodup.map_on fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem nodup_map_iff {f : α → β} {l : List α} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup (map f l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨Nodup.of_map _, Nodup.map hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem nodup_attach {l : List α} : Nodup (attach l) ↔ Nodup l :=
⟨fun h => attach_map_subtype_val l ▸ h.map fun _ _ => Subtype.eq, fun h =>
Nodup.of_map Subtype.val ((attach_map_subtype_val l).symm ▸ h)⟩
protected alias ⟨Nodup.of_attach, Nodup.attach⟩ := nodup_attach
theorem Nodup.pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l : List α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h : Nodup l) : Nodup (pmap f l H) := by
rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]
exact h.attach.map fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h => by congr; exact hf a (H _ ha) b (H _ hb) h
theorem Nodup.filter (p : α → Bool) {l} : Nodup l → Nodup (filter p l) := by
simpa using Pairwise.filter p
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse {l : List α} : Nodup (reverse l) ↔ Nodup l :=
pairwise_reverse.trans <| by simp only [Nodup, Ne, eq_comm]
lemma nodup_tail_reverse (l : List α) (h : l[0]? = l.getLast?) :
Nodup l.reverse.tail ↔ Nodup l.tail := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
by_cases hl : l = []
· aesop
· simp_all only [List.tail_reverse, List.nodup_reverse,
List.dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil hl, List.tail_cons]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.zero_lt_succ, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_zero,
Nat.add_one_sub_one, Nat.lt_add_one, Option.some.injEq, List.getElem_cons,
show l.length ≠ 0 by aesop, ↓reduceDIte, getLast?_eq_getElem?] at h
rw [h,
show l.Nodup = (l.dropLast ++ [l.getLast hl]).Nodup by
simp [List.dropLast_eq_take],
List.nodup_append_comm]
simp [List.getLast_eq_getElem]
theorem Nodup.erase_getElem [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup)
(i : Nat) (h : i < l.length) : l.erase l[i] = l.eraseIdx ↑i := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
rw [nodup_cons] at hl
rw [erase_cons_tail]
· simp [IH hl.2]
· rw [beq_iff_eq]
simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right] at h
exact mt (· ▸ getElem_mem h) hl.1
theorem Nodup.erase_get [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.erase (l.get i) = l.eraseIdx ↑i := by
simp [erase_getElem, hl]
theorem Nodup.diff [DecidableEq α] : l₁.Nodup → (l₁.diff l₂).Nodup :=
Nodup.sublist <| diff_sublist _ _
theorem nodup_flatten {L : List (List α)} :
Nodup (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, Nodup l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint L := by
simp only [Nodup, pairwise_flatten, disjoint_left.symm, forall_mem_ne]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-10-15")] alias nodup_join := nodup_flatten
theorem nodup_flatMap {l₁ : List α} {f : α → List β} :
Nodup (l₁.flatMap f) ↔
(∀ x ∈ l₁, Nodup (f x)) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on f) l₁ := by
simp only [List.flatMap, nodup_flatten, pairwise_map, and_comm, and_left_comm, mem_map,
exists_imp, and_imp]
rw [show (∀ (l : List β) (x : α), f x = l → x ∈ l₁ → Nodup l) ↔ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l₁ → Nodup (f x)
from forall_swap.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_eq']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-10-16")] alias nodup_bind := nodup_flatMap
protected theorem Nodup.product {l₂ : List β} (d₁ : l₁.Nodup) (d₂ : l₂.Nodup) :
(l₁ ×ˢ l₂).Nodup :=
nodup_flatMap.2
⟨fun a _ => d₂.map <| LeftInverse.injective fun b => (rfl : (a, b).2 = b),
d₁.imp fun {a₁ a₂} n x h₁ h₂ => by
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, _, rfl⟩
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩
exact n rfl⟩
theorem Nodup.sigma {σ : α → Type*} {l₂ : ∀ a, List (σ a)} (d₁ : Nodup l₁)
(d₂ : ∀ a, Nodup (l₂ a)) : (l₁.sigma l₂).Nodup :=
nodup_flatMap.2
⟨fun a _ => (d₂ a).map fun b b' h => by injection h with _ h,
d₁.imp fun {a₁ a₂} n x h₁ h₂ => by
rcases mem_map.1 h₁ with ⟨b₁, _, rfl⟩
rcases mem_map.1 h₂ with ⟨b₂, mb₂, ⟨⟩⟩
exact n rfl⟩
protected theorem Nodup.filterMap {f : α → Option β} (h : ∀ a a' b, b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
Nodup l → Nodup (filterMap f l) :=
(Pairwise.filterMap f) @fun a a' n b bm b' bm' e => n <| h a a' b' (by rw [← e]; exact bm) bm'
protected theorem Nodup.concat (h : a ∉ l) (h' : l.Nodup) : (l.concat a).Nodup := by
rw [concat_eq_append]; exact h'.append (nodup_singleton _) (disjoint_singleton.2 h)
protected theorem Nodup.insert [DecidableEq α] (h : l.Nodup) : (l.insert a).Nodup :=
if h' : a ∈ l then by rw [insert_of_mem h']; exact h
else by rw [insert_of_not_mem h', nodup_cons]; constructor <;> assumption
theorem Nodup.union [DecidableEq α] (l₁ : List α) (h : Nodup l₂) : (l₁ ∪ l₂).Nodup := by
induction l₁ generalizing l₂ with
| nil => exact h
| cons a l₁ ih => exact (ih h).insert
theorem Nodup.inter [DecidableEq α] (l₂ : List α) : Nodup l₁ → Nodup (l₁ ∩ l₂) :=
Nodup.filter _
theorem Nodup.diff_eq_filter [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁.Nodup), l₁.diff l₂ = l₁.filter (· ∉ l₂)
| l₁, [], _ => by simp
| l₁, a :: l₂, hl₁ => by
rw [diff_cons, (hl₁.erase _).diff_eq_filter, hl₁.erase_eq_filter, filter_filter]
simp only [decide_not, bne, Bool.and_comm, mem_cons, not_or, decide_mem_cons, Bool.not_or]
theorem Nodup.mem_diff_iff [DecidableEq α] (hl₁ : l₁.Nodup) : a ∈ l₁.diff l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ a ∉ l₂ := by
rw [hl₁.diff_eq_filter, mem_filter, decide_eq_true_iff]
protected theorem Nodup.set :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {a : α} (_ : l.Nodup) (_ : a ∉ l), (l.set n a).Nodup
| [], _, _, _, _ => nodup_nil
| _ :: _, 0, _, hl, ha => nodup_cons.2 ⟨mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha, (nodup_cons.1 hl).2⟩
| _ :: _, _ + 1, _, hl, ha =>
nodup_cons.2
⟨fun h =>
(mem_or_eq_of_mem_set h).elim (nodup_cons.1 hl).1 fun hba => ha (hba ▸ mem_cons_self),
hl.of_cons.set (mt (mem_cons_of_mem _) ha)⟩
theorem Nodup.map_update [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (f : α → β) (x : α) (y : β) :
l.map (Function.update f x y) =
if x ∈ l then (l.map f).set (l.idxOf x) y else l.map f := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons hd tl ihl => ?_
| rw [nodup_cons] at hl
simp only [mem_cons, map, ihl hl.2]
by_cases H : hd = x
| Mathlib/Data/List/Nodup.lean | 362 | 364 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,999 | 2,002 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
/-!
# `norm_num` plugins for `Rat.cast` and `⁻¹`.
-/
variable {u : Lean.Level}
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`, if it exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero AddMonoidWithOne"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero division ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
| theorem isRat_mkRat : {a na n : ℤ} → {b nb d : ℕ} → IsInt a na → IsNat b nb →
IsRat (na / nb : ℚ) n d → IsRat (mkRat a b) n d
| _, _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨_, h⟩ => by rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_div]; exact ⟨_, h⟩
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean | 56 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Partrec
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
/-!
# Gödel Numbering for Partial Recursive Functions.
This file defines `Nat.Partrec.Code`, an inductive datatype describing code for partial
recursive functions on ℕ. It defines an encoding for these codes, and proves that the constructors
are primitive recursive with respect to the encoding.
It also defines the evaluation of these codes as partial functions using `PFun`, and proves that a
function is partially recursive (as defined by `Nat.Partrec`) if and only if it is the evaluation
of some code.
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.Partrec.Code`: Inductive datatype for partial recursive codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`: A (computable) encoding of codes as natural numbers.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode`: The inverse of this encoding.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`: The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
## Main Results
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_computable`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.smn`: The $S_n^m$ theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.exists_code`: Partial recursiveness is equivalent to being the eval of a code.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_prim`: `evaln` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point`: Roger's fixed point theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point₂`: Kleene's second recursion theorem.
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open Encodable Denumerable
namespace Nat.Partrec
theorem rfind' {f} (hf : Nat.Partrec f) :
Nat.Partrec
(Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)) :=
Partrec₂.unpaired'.2 <| by
refine
Partrec.map
((@Partrec₂.unpaired' fun a b : ℕ =>
Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + b))).1
?_)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst).to_comp.to₂
have : Nat.Partrec (fun a => Nat.rfind (fun n => (fun m => decide (m = 0)) <$>
Nat.unpaired (fun a b => f (Nat.pair (Nat.unpair a).1 (b + (Nat.unpair a).2)))
(Nat.pair a n))) :=
rfind
(Partrec₂.unpaired'.2
((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hf).comp
(Primrec₂.pair.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd
(Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst))).to_comp))
simpa
/-- Code for partial recursive functions from ℕ to ℕ.
See `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval` for the interpretation of these constructors.
-/
inductive Code : Type
| zero : Code
| succ : Code
| left : Code
| right : Code
| pair : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| prec : Code → Code → Code
| rfind' : Code → Code
compile_inductive% Code
end Nat.Partrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
instance instInhabited : Inhabited Code :=
⟨zero⟩
/-- Returns a code for the constant function outputting a particular natural. -/
protected def const : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => comp succ (Code.const n)
theorem const_inj : ∀ {n₁ n₂}, Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₁ = Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₂ → n₁ = n₂
| 0, 0, _ => by simp
| n₁ + 1, n₂ + 1, h => by
dsimp [Nat.Partrec.Code.const] at h
injection h with h₁ h₂
simp only [const_inj h₂]
/-- A code for the identity function. -/
protected def id : Code :=
pair left right
/-- Given a code `c` taking a pair as input, returns a code using `n` as the first argument to `c`.
-/
def curry (c : Code) (n : ℕ) : Code :=
comp c (pair (Code.const n) Code.id)
/-- An encoding of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a ℕ. -/
def encodeCode : Code → ℕ
| zero => 0
| succ => 1
| left => 2
| right => 3
| pair cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 4
| comp cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg) + 1) + 4
| prec cf cg => (2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 1) + 4
| rfind' cf => (2 * (2 * encodeCode cf + 1) + 1) + 4
/--
A decoder for `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`, taking any ℕ to the `Nat.Partrec.Code` it represents.
-/
def ofNatCode : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| 1 => succ
| 2 => left
| 3 => right
| n + 4 =>
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
match n.bodd, n.div2.bodd with
| false, false => pair (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| false, true => comp (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , false => prec (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , true => rfind' (ofNatCode m)
/-- Proof that `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode` is the inverse of `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode` -/
private theorem encode_ofNatCode : ∀ n, encodeCode (ofNatCode n) = n
| 0 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 1 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 2 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 3 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| n + 4 => by
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
have IH := encode_ofNatCode m
have IH1 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.1
have IH2 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.2
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.bit_decomp n, ← Nat.bit_decomp n.div2]
simp only [ofNatCode.eq_5]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;>
simp [m, encodeCode, ofNatCode, IH, IH1, IH2, Nat.bit_val]
instance instDenumerable : Denumerable Code :=
mk'
⟨encodeCode, ofNatCode, fun c => by
induction c <;> simp [encodeCode, ofNatCode, Nat.div2_val, *],
encode_ofNatCode⟩
theorem encodeCode_eq : encode = encodeCode :=
rfl
theorem ofNatCode_eq : ofNat Code = ofNatCode :=
rfl
theorem encode_lt_pair (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (pair cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (pair cf cg) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (Nat.pair cf.encodeCode cg.encodeCode) (by decide : 1 ≤ 2 * 2)
rw [one_mul, mul_assoc] at this
have := lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (by decide : 0 < 4))
exact ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.left_le_pair _ _) this, lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.right_le_pair _ _) this⟩
theorem encode_lt_comp (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (comp cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (comp cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (comp cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_prec (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (prec cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (prec cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (prec cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
theorem encode_lt_rfind' (cf) : encode cf < encode (rfind' cf) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
omega
end Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Primrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
theorem pair_prim : Primrec₂ pair :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem comp_prim : Primrec₂ comp :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double_succ.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem prec_prim : Primrec₂ prec :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
theorem rfind_prim : Primrec rfind' :=
ofNat_iff.2 <|
encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <| nat_double_succ.comp <|
encode_iff.2 <| Primrec.ofNat Code)
(const 4)
theorem rec_prim' {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Primrec₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Primrec₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Primrec (fun a => F a (c a) : α → σ) := by
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
IH[m]?.bind fun s =>
IH[m.unpair.1]?.bind fun s₁ =>
IH[m.unpair.2]?.map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Primrec G₁ :=
option_bind (list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk <|
option_bind ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk <|
option_map ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk <|
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Primrec.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Primrec₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
iterate 4 rcases n with - | n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁, m, List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive. -/
theorem rec_prim {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpr : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pr a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{co : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hco : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => co a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{pc : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pc a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{rf : α → Code → σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec fun a : α × Code × σ => rf a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2) :
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (pr a) (co a) (pc a) (rf a)
Primrec fun a => F a (c a) :=
rec_prim' hc hz hs hl hr
(pr := fun a b => pr a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpr)
(co := fun a b => co a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hco)
(pc := fun a b => pc a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpc)
(rf := fun a b => rf a b.1 b.2) (.mk hrf)
end Nat.Partrec.Code
end
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Computable
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable. -/
theorem rec_computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Computable c)
{z : α → σ} (hz : Computable z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Computable s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Computable l)
{r : α → σ} (hr : Computable r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Computable₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Computable₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Computable₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Computable₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Computable fun a => F a (c a) := by
-- TODO(Mario): less copy-paste from previous proof
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
IH[m]?.bind fun s =>
IH[m.unpair.1]?.bind fun s₁ =>
IH[m.unpair.2]?.map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Computable G₁ := by
refine option_bind (list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk ?_
refine option_bind ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk ?_
refine option_map ((list_getElem?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk ?_
exact
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Computable.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Computable₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
iterate 4 rcases n with - | n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁, m, List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
end
/-- The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.zero`: The constant zero function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.succ`: The successor function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.left`: Left unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.right`: Right unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.pair`: Pairs the outputs of argument codes using `Nat.pair`.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.comp`: Composition of two argument codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.prec`: Primitive recursion. Given an argument of the form `Nat.pair a n`:
* If `n = 0`, returns `eval cf a`.
* If `n = succ k`, returns `eval cg (pair a (pair k (eval (prec cf cg) (pair a k))))`
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rfind'`: Minimization. For `f` an argument of the form `Nat.pair a m`,
`rfind' f m` returns the least `a` such that `f a m = 0`, if one exists and `f b m` terminates
for `b < a`
-/
def eval : Code → ℕ →. ℕ
| zero => pure 0
| succ => Nat.succ
| left => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair cf cg => fun n => Nat.pair <$> eval cf n <*> eval cg n
| comp cf cg => fun n => eval cg n >>= eval cf
| prec cf cg =>
Nat.unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (eval cf a) fun y IH => do
let i ← IH
eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| rfind' cf =>
Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> eval cf (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the base case. -/
@[simp]
theorem eval_prec_zero (cf cg : Code) (a : ℕ) : eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a 0) = eval cf a := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp (config := { Lean.Meta.Simp.neutralConfig with proj := true }) only []
rw [Nat.rec_zero]
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the recursive case. -/
theorem eval_prec_succ (cf cg : Code) (a k : ℕ) :
eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a (Nat.succ k)) =
do {let ih ← eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a k); eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair k ih))} := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Part.bind_eq_bind, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp
instance : Membership (ℕ →. ℕ) Code :=
⟨fun c f => eval c = f⟩
@[simp]
theorem eval_const : ∀ n m, eval (Code.const n) m = Part.some n
| 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, m => by simp! [eval_const n m]
@[simp]
theorem eval_id (n) : eval Code.id n = Part.some n := by simp! [Seq.seq, Code.id]
@[simp]
theorem eval_curry (c n x) : eval (curry c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) := by simp! [Seq.seq, curry]
theorem const_prim : Primrec Code.const :=
(_root_.Primrec.id.nat_iterate (_root_.Primrec.const zero)
(comp_prim.comp (_root_.Primrec.const succ) Primrec.snd).to₂).of_eq
fun n => by simp; induction n <;>
simp [*, Code.const, Function.iterate_succ', -Function.iterate_succ]
theorem curry_prim : Primrec₂ curry :=
comp_prim.comp Primrec.fst <| pair_prim.comp (const_prim.comp Primrec.snd)
(_root_.Primrec.const Code.id)
theorem curry_inj {c₁ c₂ n₁ n₂} (h : curry c₁ n₁ = curry c₂ n₂) : c₁ = c₂ ∧ n₁ = n₂ :=
⟨by injection h, by
injection h with h₁ h₂
injection h₂ with h₃ h₄
exact const_inj h₃⟩
/--
The $S_n^m$ theorem: There is a computable function, namely `Nat.Partrec.Code.curry`, that takes a
program and a ℕ `n`, and returns a new program using `n` as the first argument.
-/
theorem smn :
∃ f : Code → ℕ → Code, Computable₂ f ∧ ∀ c n x, eval (f c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) :=
⟨curry, Primrec₂.to_comp curry_prim, eval_curry⟩
/-- A function is partial recursive if and only if there is a code implementing it. Therefore,
`eval` is a **universal partial recursive function**. -/
theorem exists_code {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec f ↔ ∃ c : Code, eval c = f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· induction h with
| zero => exact ⟨zero, rfl⟩
| succ => exact ⟨succ, rfl⟩
| left => exact ⟨left, rfl⟩
| right => exact ⟨right, rfl⟩
| pair pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨pair cf cg, rfl⟩
| comp pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨comp cf cg, rfl⟩
| prec pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨prec cf cg, rfl⟩
| rfind pf hf =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩
refine ⟨comp (rfind' cf) (pair Code.id zero), ?_⟩
simp [eval, Seq.seq, pure, PFun.pure, Part.map_id']
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
induction c with
| zero => exact Nat.Partrec.zero
| succ => exact Nat.Partrec.succ
| left => exact Nat.Partrec.left
| right => exact Nat.Partrec.right
| pair cf cg pf pg => exact pf.pair pg
| comp cf cg pf pg => exact pf.comp pg
| prec cf cg pf pg => exact pf.prec pg
| rfind' cf pf => exact pf.rfind'
/-- A modified evaluation for the code which returns an `Option ℕ` instead of a `Part ℕ`. To avoid
undecidability, `evaln` takes a parameter `k` and fails if it encounters a number ≥ k in the course
of its execution. Other than this, the semantics are the same as in `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`.
-/
def evaln : ℕ → Code → ℕ → Option ℕ
| 0, _ => fun _ => Option.none
| k + 1, zero => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return 0
| k + 1, succ => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return (Nat.succ n)
| k + 1, left => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return n.unpair.1
| k + 1, right => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
pure n.unpair.2
| k + 1, pair cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
Nat.pair <$> evaln (k + 1) cf n <*> evaln (k + 1) cg n
| k + 1, comp cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cg n
evaln (k + 1) cf x
| k + 1, prec cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a n =>
n.casesOn (evaln (k + 1) cf a) fun y => do
let i ← evaln k (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a y)
evaln (k + 1) cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| k + 1, rfind' cf => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a m => do
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cf (Nat.pair a m)
if x = 0 then
pure m
else
evaln k (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair a (m + 1))
theorem evaln_bound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → n < k
| 0, c, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
suffices ∀ {o : Option ℕ}, x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o } → n < k + 1 by
cases c <;> rw [evaln] at h <;> exact this h
simpa [Option.bind_eq_some_iff] using Nat.lt_succ_of_le
theorem evaln_mono : ∀ {k₁ k₂ c n x}, k₁ ≤ k₂ → x ∈ evaln k₁ c n → x ∈ evaln k₂ c n
| 0, k₂, c, n, x, _, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, k₂ + 1, c, n, x, hl, h => by
have hl' := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hl
have :
∀ {k k₂ n x : ℕ} {o₁ o₂ : Option ℕ},
k ≤ k₂ → (x ∈ o₁ → x ∈ o₂) →
x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o₁ } → x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k₂); o₂ } := by
simp only [Option.mem_def, bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff, Option.guard_eq_some',
exists_and_left, exists_const, and_imp]
introv h h₁ h₂ h₃
exact ⟨le_trans h₂ h, h₁ h₃⟩
simp? at h ⊢ says simp only [Option.mem_def] at h ⊢
induction c generalizing x n <;> rw [evaln] at h ⊢ <;> refine this hl' (fun h => ?_) h
iterate 4 exact h
case pair cf cg hf hg _ =>
simp? [Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [Seq.seq, Option.map_eq_map, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff,
Option.map_eq_some', exists_exists_and_eq_and] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hf _ _) <| Exists.imp fun b => And.imp_left (hg _ _)
case comp cf cg hf hg _ =>
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [bind, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hg _ _) (hf _ _)
case prec cf cg hf hg _ =>
revert h
simp only [unpaired, bind, Option.mem_def]
induction n.unpair.2 <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· apply hf
· exact fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, evaln_mono hl' h₁, hg _ _ h₂⟩
case rfind' cf hf _ =>
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢ says
simp only [unpaired, bind, pair_unpair, Option.pure_def, Option.mem_def,
Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
refine h.imp fun x => And.imp (hf _ _) ?_
by_cases x0 : x = 0 <;> simp [x0]
exact evaln_mono hl'
theorem evaln_sound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → x ∈ eval c n
| 0, _, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
induction c generalizing x n <;> simp [eval, evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff, Seq.seq] at h ⊢ <;>
obtain ⟨_, h⟩ := h
iterate 4 simpa [pure, PFun.pure, eq_comm] using h
case pair cf cg hf hg _ =>
rcases h with ⟨y, ef, z, eg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf _ _ ef, _, hg _ _ eg, rfl⟩
case comp cf cg hf hg _ =>
rcases h with ⟨y, eg, ef⟩
exact ⟨_, hg _ _ eg, hf _ _ ef⟩
case prec cf cg hf hg _ =>
revert h
induction' n.unpair.2 with m IH generalizing x <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· apply hf
· refine fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, IH _ ?_, ?_⟩
· have := evaln_mono k.le_succ h₁
simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at this
exact this.2
· exact hg _ _ h₂
case rfind' cf hf _ =>
rcases h with ⟨m, h₁, h₂⟩
by_cases m0 : m = 0 <;> simp [m0] at h₂
· exact
⟨0, ⟨by simpa [m0] using hf _ _ h₁, fun {m} => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim⟩, by simp [h₂]⟩
· have := evaln_sound h₂
simp [eval] at this
rcases this with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
refine
⟨y + 1, ⟨by simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁, fun {i} im => ?_⟩, by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
rcases i with - | i
· exact ⟨m, by simpa using hf _ _ h₁, m0⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ im) with ⟨z, hz, z0⟩
exact ⟨z, by simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm] using hz, z0⟩
theorem evaln_complete {c n x} : x ∈ eval c n ↔ ∃ k, x ∈ evaln k c n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨k, h⟩ => evaln_sound h⟩
rsuffices ⟨k, h⟩ : ∃ k, x ∈ evaln (k + 1) c n
· exact ⟨k + 1, h⟩
induction c generalizing n x with
simp [eval, evaln, pure, PFun.pure, Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some_iff] at h ⊢
| pair cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
rcases hf hx with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hg hy with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
refine
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂, rfl⟩
| comp cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rcases hg hy with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hf hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
exact
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
| prec cf cg hf hg =>
revert h
generalize n.unpair.1 = n₁; generalize n.unpair.2 = n₂
induction' n₂ with m IH generalizing x n <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· intro h
rcases hf h with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, le_max_left _ _, evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk⟩
· intro y hy hx
rcases IH hy with ⟨k₁, nk₁, hk₁⟩
rcases hg hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine
⟨(max k₁ k₂).succ,
Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <|
le_trans (le_max_left _ (Nat.pair n₁ m)) nk₁, y,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) ?_,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
simp only [evaln.eq_8, bind, unpaired, unpair_pair, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some_iff,
Option.guard_eq_some', exists_and_left, exists_const]
exact ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) nk₁, hk₁⟩
| rfind' cf hf =>
rcases h with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
suffices ∃ k, y + n.unpair.2 ∈ evaln (k + 1) (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2) by
simpa [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
revert hy₁ hy₂
generalize n.unpair.2 = m
intro hy₁ hy₂
induction' y with y IH generalizing m <;> simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some_iff]
· simp at hy₁
rcases hf hy₁ with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk, _, hk, by simp⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.succ_pos _) with ⟨a, ha, a0⟩
rcases hf ha with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩
rcases IH m.succ (by simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁)
fun {i} hi => by
simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
hy₂ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hi) with
⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
use (max k₁ k₂).succ
rw [zero_add] at hk₁
use Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁
use a
use evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁
simpa [a0, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂
| _ => exact ⟨⟨_, le_rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
section
open Primrec
private def lup (L : List (List (Option ℕ))) (p : ℕ × Code) (n : ℕ) := do
let l ← L[encode p]?
let o ← l[n]?
o
private theorem hlup : Primrec fun p : _ × (_ × _) × _ => lup p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 :=
Primrec.option_bind
(Primrec.list_getElem?.comp Primrec.fst (Primrec.encode.comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd))
(Primrec.option_bind (Primrec.list_getElem?.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp <|
Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst) Primrec.snd)
private def G (L : List (List (Option ℕ))) : Option (List (Option ℕ)) :=
Option.some <|
let a := ofNat (ℕ × Code) L.length
let k := a.1
let c := a.2
(List.range k).map fun n =>
k.casesOn Option.none fun k' =>
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c
(some 0) -- zero
(some (Nat.succ n))
(some n.unpair.1)
(some n.unpair.2)
(fun cf cg _ _ => do
let x ← lup L (k, cf) n
let y ← lup L (k, cg) n
some (Nat.pair x y))
(fun cf cg _ _ => do
let x ← lup L (k, cg) n
lup L (k, cf) x)
(fun cf cg _ _ =>
let z := n.unpair.1
n.unpair.2.casesOn (lup L (k, cf) z) fun y => do
let i ← lup L (k', c) (Nat.pair z y)
lup L (k, cg) (Nat.pair z (Nat.pair y i)))
(fun cf _ =>
let z := n.unpair.1
let m := n.unpair.2
do
let x ← lup L (k, cf) (Nat.pair z m)
x.casesOn (some m) fun _ => lup L (k', c) (Nat.pair z (m + 1)))
private theorem hG : Primrec G := by
have a := (Primrec.ofNat (ℕ × Code)).comp (Primrec.list_length (α := List (Option ℕ)))
have k := Primrec.fst.comp a
refine Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.list_map (Primrec.list_range.comp k) (?_ : Primrec _))
replace k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have n := Primrec.snd (α := List (List (Option ℕ))) (β := ℕ)
refine Primrec.nat_casesOn k (_root_.Primrec.const Option.none) (?_ : Primrec _)
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have k' := Primrec.snd (α := List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) (β := ℕ)
have c := Primrec.snd.comp (a.comp <| (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ)).comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ)))
apply
Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim c
(_root_.Primrec.const (some 0))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp n))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp n))
(Primrec.option_some.comp (Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp n))
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
refine Primrec.option_bind (hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair n) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
conv =>
congr
· ext p
dsimp only []
erw [Option.bind_eq_bind, ← Option.map_eq_bind]
refine Primrec.option_map ((hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cg).pair n).comp Primrec.fst) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
exact Primrec₂.natPair.comp (Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst) Primrec.snd
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
refine Primrec.option_bind (hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cg).pair n) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
have h :=
hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <| ((k.pair cf).comp Primrec.fst).pair Primrec.snd)
exact h
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
| (Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have cg := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.snd).comp
(Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ))
have z := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
refine
Primrec.nat_casesOn (Primrec.snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n))
(hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair z)
(?_ : Primrec _)
have L := L.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have z := z.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have y := Primrec.snd
(α := ((List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ) × Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ) (β := ℕ)
have h₁ := hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (((k'.pair c).comp Primrec.fst).comp Primrec.fst).pair
(Primrec₂.natPair.comp z y)
refine Primrec.option_bind h₁ (?_ : Primrec _)
have z := z.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have y := y.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
have i := Primrec.snd
(α := (((List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ) × Code × Code × Option ℕ × Option ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := ℕ)
have h₂ := hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
((k.pair cg).comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp z <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp y i)
exact h₂
· have L := (Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).comp
(Primrec.fst (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Option ℕ))
have k := k.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Option ℕ))
have n := n.comp (Primrec.fst (β := Code × Option ℕ))
have cf := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.snd (α := (List (List (Option ℕ)) × ℕ) × ℕ)
(β := Code × Option ℕ))
have z := Primrec.fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
have m := Primrec.snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp n)
have h₁ := hlup.comp <| L.pair <| (k.pair cf).pair (Primrec₂.natPair.comp z m)
refine Primrec.option_bind h₁ (?_ : Primrec _)
have m := m.comp (Primrec.fst (β := ℕ))
refine Primrec.nat_casesOn Primrec.snd (Primrec.option_some.comp m) ?_
unfold Primrec₂
exact (hlup.comp ((L.comp Primrec.fst).pair <|
((k'.pair c).comp <| Primrec.fst.comp Primrec.fst).pair
(Primrec₂.natPair.comp (z.comp Primrec.fst) (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp m)))).comp
Primrec.fst
private theorem evaln_map (k c n) :
((List.range k)[n]?.bind fun a ↦ evaln k c a) = evaln k c n := by
by_cases kn : n < k
· simp [List.getElem?_range kn]
· rw [List.getElem?_eq_none]
· cases e : evaln k c n
· rfl
exact kn.elim (evaln_bound e)
simpa using kn
/-- The `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln` function is primitive recursive. -/
theorem evaln_prim : Primrec fun a : (ℕ × Code) × ℕ => evaln a.1.1 a.1.2 a.2 :=
have :
Primrec₂ fun (_ : Unit) (n : ℕ) =>
let a := ofNat (ℕ × Code) n
(List.range a.1).map (evaln a.1 a.2) :=
Primrec.nat_strong_rec _ (hG.comp Primrec.snd).to₂ fun _ p => by
simp only [G, prod_ofNat_val, ofNat_nat, List.length_map, List.length_range,
Nat.pair_unpair, Option.some_inj]
refine List.map_congr_left fun n => ?_
have : List.range p = List.range (Nat.pair p.unpair.1 (encode (ofNat Code p.unpair.2))) := by
simp
rw [this]
generalize p.unpair.1 = k
generalize ofNat Code p.unpair.2 = c
intro nk
rcases k with - | k'
· simp [evaln]
let k := k' + 1
simp only [show k'.succ = k from rfl]
simp? [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at nk says simp only [List.mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at nk
have hg :
∀ {k' c' n},
Nat.pair k' (encode c') < Nat.pair k (encode c) →
lup ((List.range (Nat.pair k (encode c))).map fun n =>
(List.range n.unpair.1).map (evaln n.unpair.1 (ofNat Code n.unpair.2))) (k', c') n =
evaln k' c' n := by
intro k₁ c₁ n₁ hl
simp [lup, List.getElem?_range hl, evaln_map, Bind.bind, Option.bind_map]
obtain - | - | - | - | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | ⟨cf, cg⟩ | cf := c <;>
simp [evaln, nk, Bind.bind, Functor.map, Seq.seq, pure]
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_pair cf cg
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf), hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lg)]
cases evaln k cf n
· rfl
cases evaln k cg n <;> rfl
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_comp cf cg
rw [hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lg)]
cases evaln k cg n
· rfl
simp [k, hg (Nat.pair_lt_pair_right _ lf)]
· obtain ⟨lf, lg⟩ := encode_lt_prec cf cg
| Mathlib/Computability/PartrecCode.lean | 844 | 944 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Alexey Soloyev, Junyan Xu, Kamila Szewczyk
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.LinearRecurrence
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Fib.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Irrational
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.NatFib
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Prime
/-!
# The golden ratio and its conjugate
This file defines the golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2` and its conjugate
`ψ := (1 - √5)/2`, which are the two real roots of `X² - X - 1`.
Along with various computational facts about them, we prove their
irrationality, and we link them to the Fibonacci sequence by proving
Binet's formula.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
/-- The golden ratio `φ := (1 + √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenRatio : ℝ := (1 + √5) / 2
/-- The conjugate of the golden ratio `ψ := (1 - √5)/2`. -/
abbrev goldenConj : ℝ := (1 - √5) / 2
@[inherit_doc goldenRatio] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "φ" => goldenRatio
@[inherit_doc goldenConj] scoped[goldenRatio] notation "ψ" => goldenConj
open Real goldenRatio
/-- The inverse of the golden ratio is the opposite of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_gold : φ⁻¹ = -ψ := by
have : 1 + √5 ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (add_pos (by norm_num) <| Real.sqrt_pos.mpr (by norm_num))
field_simp [sub_mul, mul_add]
norm_num
/-- The opposite of the golden ratio is the inverse of its conjugate. -/
theorem inv_goldConj : ψ⁻¹ = -φ := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← neg_inv, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact inv_gold.symm
@[simp]
theorem gold_mul_goldConj : φ * ψ = -1 := by
field_simp
rw [← sq_sub_sq]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem goldConj_mul_gold : ψ * φ = -1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact gold_mul_goldConj
@[simp]
theorem gold_add_goldConj : φ + ψ = 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, goldenConj]
ring
theorem one_sub_goldConj : 1 - φ = ψ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
theorem one_sub_gold : 1 - ψ = φ := by
linarith [gold_add_goldConj]
@[simp]
theorem gold_sub_goldConj : φ - ψ = √5 := by ring
theorem gold_pow_sub_gold_pow (n : ℕ) : φ ^ (n + 2) - φ ^ (n + 1) = φ ^ n := by
rw [goldenRatio]; ring_nf; norm_num; ring
@[simp 1200]
theorem gold_sq : φ ^ 2 = φ + 1 := by
rw [goldenRatio, ← sub_eq_zero]
ring_nf
rw [Real.sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
@[simp 1200]
theorem goldConj_sq : ψ ^ 2 = ψ + 1 := by
rw [goldenConj, ← sub_eq_zero]
ring_nf
rw [Real.sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
theorem gold_pos : 0 < φ :=
mul_pos (by apply add_pos <;> norm_num) <| inv_pos.2 zero_lt_two
theorem gold_ne_zero : φ ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt gold_pos
theorem one_lt_gold : 1 < φ := by
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ?_ (le_of_lt gold_pos)
simp [← sq, gold_pos, zero_lt_one]
theorem gold_lt_two : φ < 2 := by calc
(1 + sqrt 5) / 2 < (1 + 3) / 2 := by gcongr; rw [sqrt_lt'] <;> norm_num
_ = 2 := by norm_num
theorem goldConj_neg : ψ < 0 := by
linarith [one_sub_goldConj, one_lt_gold]
theorem goldConj_ne_zero : ψ ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_lt goldConj_neg
theorem neg_one_lt_goldConj : -1 < ψ := by
rw [neg_lt, ← inv_gold]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ one_lt_gold
/-!
## Irrationality
| -/
| Mathlib/Data/Real/GoldenRatio.lean | 117 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,700 | 2,703 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Circulant matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about circulant matrices.
Given a vector `v : n → α` indexed by a type that is endowed with subtraction,
`Matrix.circulant v` is the matrix whose `(i, j)`th entry is `v (i - j)`.
## Main results
- `Matrix.circulant`: the circulant matrix generated by a given vector `v : n → α`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul`: the product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul_comm`: multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do.
## Implementation notes
`Matrix.Fin.foo` is the `Fin n` version of `Matrix.foo`.
Namely, the index type of the circulant matrices in discussion is `Fin n`.
## Tags
circulant, matrix
-/
variable {α β n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
/-- Given the condition `[Sub n]` and a vector `v : n → α`,
we define `circulant v` to be the circulant matrix generated by `v` of type `Matrix n n α`.
The `(i,j)`th entry is defined to be `v (i - j)`. -/
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
theorem circulant_injective [SubtractionMonoid n] :
Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
@[simp]
theorem circulant_inj [SubtractionMonoid n] {v w : n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
circulant_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Fin.circulant_inj {n} {v w : Fin n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
(Fin.circulant_injective n).eq_iff
theorem transpose_circulant [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i) := by ext; simp
theorem conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i)) := by ext; simp
theorem Fin.transpose_circulant : ∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.transpose_circulant
theorem Fin.conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] :
∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i))
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.conjTranspose_circulant
theorem map_circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) (f : α → β) :
(circulant v).map f = circulant fun i => f (v i) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_neg [Neg α] [Sub n] (v : n → α) : circulant (-v) = -circulant v :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_zero (α n) [Zero α] [Sub n] : circulant 0 = (0 : Matrix n n α) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_add [Add α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v + w) = circulant v + circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_sub [Sub α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v - w) = circulant v - circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`. -/
theorem circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [Fintype n] [AddGroup n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w) := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, mulVec, circulant_apply, dotProduct]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.subRight j) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.subRight_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Fin.circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul
/-- Multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do. -/
theorem circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] [Fintype n] [AddCommGroup n]
(v w : n → α) : circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, circulant_apply, mul_comm]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv ((Equiv.subLeft i).trans (Equiv.addRight j)) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.subLeft_apply, Equiv.coe_addRight, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_comm]
congr 2
abel
theorem Fin.circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul_comm
/-- `k • circulant v` is another circulant matrix `circulant (k • v)`. -/
theorem circulant_smul [Sub n] [SMul R α] (k : R) (v : n → α) :
circulant (k • v) = k • circulant v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single_one (α n) [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] :
circulant (Pi.single 0 1 : n → α) = (1 : Matrix n n α) := by
ext i j
simp [one_apply, Pi.single_apply, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single (n) [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] [Fintype n] (a : α) :
circulant (Pi.single 0 a : n → α) = scalar n a := by
ext i j
simp [Pi.single_apply, diagonal_apply, sub_eq_zero]
/-- Note we use `↑i = 0` instead of `i = 0` as `Fin 0` has no `0`.
This means that we cannot state this with `Pi.single` as we did with `Matrix.circulant_single`. -/
theorem Fin.circulant_ite (α) [Zero α] [One α] :
∀ n, circulant (fun i => ite (i.1 = 0) 1 0 : Fin n → α) = 1
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| n + 1 => by
rw [← circulant_single_one]
congr with j
simp [Pi.single_apply]
/-- A circulant of `v` is symmetric iff `v` equals its reverse. -/
theorem circulant_isSymm_iff [SubtractionMonoid n] {v : n → α} :
(circulant v).IsSymm ↔ ∀ i, v (-i) = v i := by
rw [IsSymm, transpose_circulant, circulant_inj, funext_iff]
theorem Fin.circulant_isSymm_iff : ∀ {n} {v : Fin n → α}, (circulant v).IsSymm ↔ ∀ i, v (-i) = v i
| 0 => by simp [IsSymm.ext_iff, IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_isSymm_iff
/-- If `circulant v` is symmetric, `∀ i j : I, v (- i) = v i`. -/
theorem circulant_isSymm_apply [SubtractionMonoid n] {v : n → α} (h : (circulant v).IsSymm)
(i : n) : v (-i) = v i :=
circulant_isSymm_iff.1 h i
theorem Fin.circulant_isSymm_apply {n} {v : Fin n → α} (h : (circulant v).IsSymm) (i : Fin n) :
v (-i) = v i :=
Fin.circulant_isSymm_iff.1 h i
end Matrix
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 192 | 194 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Sum
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Tactic.CC
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we continue the work on equivalences begun in `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean`, defining
a lot of equivalences between various types and operations on these equivalences.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Mathlib/Algebra/Equiv/TransferInstance.lean` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
universe u v w z
open Function
-- Unless required to be `Type*`, all variables in this file are `Sort*`
variable {α α₁ α₂ β β₁ β₂ γ δ : Sort*}
namespace Equiv
/-- The product over `Option α` of `β a` is the binary product of the
product over `α` of `β (some α)` and `β none` -/
@[simps]
def piOptionEquivProd {α} {β : Option α → Type*} :
(∀ a : Option α, β a) ≃ β none × ∀ a : α, β (some a) where
toFun f := (f none, fun a => f (some a))
invFun x a := Option.casesOn a x.fst x.snd
left_inv f := funext fun a => by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv x := by simp
section subtypeCongr
/-- Combines an `Equiv` between two subtypes with an `Equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtypeCongr {α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x }) (f : { x // ¬p x } ≃ { x // ¬q x }) : Perm α :=
(sumCompl p).symm.trans ((sumCongr e f).trans (sumCompl q))
variable {ε : Type*} {p : ε → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
variable (ep ep' : Perm { a // p a }) (en en' : Perm { a // ¬p a })
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def Perm.subtypeCongr : Equiv.Perm ε :=
permCongr (sumCompl p) (sumCongr ep en)
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.apply (a : ε) : ep.subtypeCongr en a =
if h : p a then (ep ⟨a, h⟩ : ε) else en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [Perm.subtypeCongr, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype (a : { a // p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply ep en a.property
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype (a : { a // ¬p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply ep en a.property
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.refl :
Perm.subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl { a // p a }) (Equiv.refl { a // ¬p a }) = Equiv.refl ε := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.symm : (ep.subtypeCongr en).symm = Perm.subtypeCongr ep.symm en.symm := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x
· have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
· have : ¬p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en.symm _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.trans :
(ep.subtypeCongr en).trans (ep'.subtypeCongr en')
= Perm.subtypeCongr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') := by
ext x
by_cases h : p x
· have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, this]
· have : ¬p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
end subtypeCongr
section subtypePreimage
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x₀ : { a // p a } → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypePreimage : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ } ≃ ({ a // ¬p a } → β) where
toFun (x : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ }) a := (x : α → β) a
invFun x := ⟨fun a => if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩, funext fun ⟨_, h⟩ => dif_pos h⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
Subtype.val_injective <|
funext fun a => by
dsimp only
split_ifs
· rw [← hx]; rfl
· rfl
right_inv x :=
funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
show dite (p a) _ _ = _ by
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h]
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
end subtypePreimage
section
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `∀ a, β₁ a` and
`∀ a, β₂ a`. -/
@[simps]
def piCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (∀ a, β₁ a) ≃ (∀ a, β₂ a) :=
⟨Pi.map fun a ↦ F a, Pi.map fun a ↦ (F a).symm, fun H => funext <| by simp,
fun H => funext <| by simp⟩
/-- Given `φ : α → β → Sort*`, we have an equivalence between `∀ a b, φ a b` and `∀ b a, φ a b`.
This is `Function.swap` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def piComm (φ : α → β → Sort*) : (∀ a b, φ a b) ≃ ∀ b a, φ a b :=
⟨swap, swap, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem piComm_symm {φ : α → β → Sort*} : (piComm φ).symm = (piComm <| swap φ) :=
rfl
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions).
This is `Sigma.curry` and `Sigma.uncurry` together as an equiv. -/
def piCurry {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) :
(∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ ∀ a b, γ a b where
toFun := Sigma.curry
invFun := Sigma.uncurry
left_inv := Sigma.uncurry_curry
right_inv := Sigma.curry_uncurry
-- `simps` overapplies these but `simps -fullyApplied` under-applies them
@[simp] theorem piCurry_apply {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*)
(f : ∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) :
piCurry γ f = Sigma.curry f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem piCurry_symm_apply {α} {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) (f : ∀ a b, γ a b) :
(piCurry γ).symm f = Sigma.uncurry f :=
rfl
end
section prodCongr
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
-- See also `Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between fibers gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofFiberEquiv {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) : α ≃ β :=
(sigmaFiberEquiv f).symm.trans <| (Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaFiberEquiv g)
theorem ofFiberEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) (a : α) : g (ofFiberEquiv e a) = f a :=
(_ : { b // g b = _ }).property
end prodCongr
section
open Sum
/-- An equivalence that separates out the 0th fiber of `(Σ (n : ℕ), f n)`. -/
def sigmaNatSucc (f : ℕ → Type u) : (Σ n, f n) ≃ f 0 ⊕ Σ n, f (n + 1) :=
⟨fun x =>
@Sigma.casesOn ℕ f (fun _ => f 0 ⊕ Σ n, f (n + 1)) x fun n =>
@Nat.casesOn (fun i => f i → f 0 ⊕ Σ n : ℕ, f (n + 1)) n (fun x : f 0 => Sum.inl x)
fun (n : ℕ) (x : f n.succ) => Sum.inr ⟨n, x⟩,
Sum.elim (Sigma.mk 0) (Sigma.map Nat.succ fun _ => id), by rintro ⟨n | n, x⟩ <;> rfl, by
rintro (x | ⟨n, x⟩) <;> rfl⟩
end
section
open Sum Nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ PUnit`. -/
def natEquivNatSumPUnit : ℕ ≃ ℕ ⊕ PUnit where
toFun n := Nat.casesOn n (inr PUnit.unit) inl
invFun := Sum.elim Nat.succ fun _ => 0
left_inv n := by cases n <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
/-- `ℕ ⊕ PUnit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def natSumPUnitEquivNat : ℕ ⊕ PUnit ≃ ℕ :=
natEquivNatSumPUnit.symm
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def intEquivNatSumNat : ℤ ≃ ℕ ⊕ ℕ where
toFun z := Int.casesOn z inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim Int.ofNat Int.negSucc
left_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
end
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `Unique β`. -/
def uniqueCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α ≃ Unique β where
toFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm
invFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `IsEmpty α` is equivalent to `IsEmpty β`. -/
theorem isEmpty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : IsEmpty α ↔ IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e.symm, fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e⟩
protected theorem isEmpty (e : α ≃ β) [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty α :=
e.isEmpty_congr.mpr ‹_›
section
open Subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `Perm.subtypePerm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def subtypeEquiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // q b } where
toFun a := ⟨e a, (h _).mp a.property⟩
invFun b := ⟨e.symm b, (h _).mpr ((e.apply_symm_apply b).symm ▸ b.property)⟩
left_inv a := Subtype.ext <| by simp
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| by simp
lemma coe_subtypeEquiv_eq_map {X Y} {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} (e : X ≃ Y)
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (e x)) : ⇑(e.subtypeEquiv h) = Subtype.map e (h · |>.mp) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_refl {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (Equiv.refl _ a) := fun _ => Iff.rfl) :
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv h = Equiv.refl { a : α // p a } := by
ext
rfl
-- We use `as_aux_lemma` here to avoid creating large proof terms when using `simp`
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).symm =
e.symm.subtypeEquiv (by as_aux_lemma =>
intro a
convert (h <| e.symm a).symm
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ b : β, q b ↔ r (f b)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).trans (f.subtypeEquiv h')
= (e.trans f).subtypeEquiv (by as_aux_lemma => exact fun a => (h a).trans (h' <| e a)) :=
rfl
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeEquivRight {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x) : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x } :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl _) e
lemma subtypeEquivRight_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // p x }) : subtypeEquivRight e z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mp z.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // q x }) : (subtypeEquivRight e).symm z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mpr z.2⟩ := rfl
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) : { a : α // p (e a) } ≃ { b : β // p b } :=
subtypeEquiv e <| by simp
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // p (e.symm b) } :=
e.symm.subtypeEquivOfSubtype.symm
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtypeEquivProp {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : Subtype p ≃ Subtype q :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl α) fun _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists (p : α → Prop) (q : Subtype p → Prop) :
Subtype q ≃ { a : α // ∃ h : p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨a.1, a.1.2, by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a, hap⟩, haq⟩
exact haq⟩,
fun a => ⟨⟨a, a.2.fst⟩, a.2.snd⟩, fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => rfl⟩
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists p _).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => @exists_prop (q x) (p x)
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype {α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype q :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter p _).trans <| subtypeEquivRight fun _ => and_iff_right_of_imp h
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtypeUnivEquiv {α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) : Subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => ⟨x, h x⟩, fun _ => Subtype.eq rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtypeSigmaEquiv {α} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) : { y : Sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ x :
Subtype q, p x.1 :=
⟨fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun _ => rfl,
fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset {α} (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : Subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtypeSigmaEquiv p q).symm.trans <| subtypeUnivEquiv fun x => h x.1 x.2
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : Subtype p, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
calc
_ ≃ Σy : β, { x : α // f x = y } := sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ p fun _ ⟨x, h'⟩ => h' ▸ h x
_ ≃ α := sigmaFiberEquiv f
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (Σ y : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Subtype p :=
calc
(Σy : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Σy :
Subtype q, { x : Subtype p // Subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y } := by {
apply sigmaCongrRight
intro y
apply Equiv.symm
refine (subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _).trans (subtypeEquivRight ?_)
intro x
exact ⟨fun ⟨hp, h'⟩ => congr_arg Subtype.val h', fun h' => ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2),
Subtype.eq h'⟩⟩ }
_ ≃ Subtype p := sigmaFiberEquiv fun x : Subtype p => (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : Subtype q)
/-- A sigma type over an `Option` is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty at none. -/
def sigmaOptionEquivOfSome {α} (p : Option α → Type v) (h : p none → False) :
(Σ x : Option α, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p (some x) :=
haveI h' : ∀ x, p x → x.isSome := by
intro x
cases x
· intro n
exfalso
exact h n
· intro _
exact rfl
(sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ _ h').symm.trans (sigmaCongrLeft' (optionIsSomeEquiv α))
/-- The `Pi`-type `∀ i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`Sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def piEquivSubtypeSigma (ι) (π : ι → Type*) :
(∀ i, π i) ≃ { f : ι → Σ i, π i // ∀ i, (f i).1 = i } where
toFun := fun f => ⟨fun i => ⟨i, f i⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
invFun := fun f i => by rw [← f.2 i]; exact (f.1 i).2
left_inv := fun _ => funext fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| funext fun i =>
Sigma.eq (hf i).symm <| eq_of_heq <| rec_heq_of_heq _ <| by simp
/-- The type of functions `f : ∀ a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the type of functions `∀ a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtypePiEquivPi {β : α → Sort v} {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} :
{ f : ∀ a, β a // ∀ a, p a (f a) } ≃ ∀ a, { b : β a // p a b } where
toFun := fun f a => ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩
invFun := fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).1, fun a => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro f
funext a
exact Subtype.ext_val rfl
end
section subtypeEquivCodomain
variable {X Y : Sort*} [DecidableEq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
{ g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } ≃ Y :=
(subtypePreimage _ f).trans <|
@funUnique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } _ <|
show Unique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } from
@Equiv.unique _ _
(show Unique { x' // x' = x } from {
default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h })
(subtypeEquivRight fun _ => not_not)
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
(subtypeEquivCodomain f : _ → Y) =
fun g : { g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } => (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (g) :
subtypeEquivCodomain f g = (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm : Y → _) = fun y =>
⟨fun x' => if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y, by
funext x'
simp only [ne_eq, dite_not, comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro w
exfalso
exact x'.property w⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
(f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
end subtypeEquivCodomain
instance : CanLift (α → β) (α ≃ β) (↑) Bijective where prf f hf := ⟨ofBijective f hf, rfl⟩
section
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : Perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α' ≃ Subtype p)
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → Subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `Set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `Equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `Equiv.of_leftInverse'` or `Equiv.of_leftInverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `Equiv.ofInjective` in the general case.
-/
def Perm.extendDomain : Perm β' :=
(permCongr f e).subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl _)
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_image (a : α') : e.extendDomain f (f a) = f (e a) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extendDomain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬p b) : e.extendDomain f b = b := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_refl : Perm.extendDomain (Equiv.refl _) f = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_symm : (e.extendDomain f).symm = Perm.extendDomain e.symm f :=
rfl
theorem Perm.extendDomain_trans (e e' : Perm α') :
(e.extendDomain f).trans (e'.extendDomain f) = Perm.extendDomain (e.trans e') f := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, permCongr_trans]
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype (p₁ : α → Prop) {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)}
(p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂.r x y ↔ s₁.r x y) : {x // p₂ x} ≃ Quotient s₂ where
toFun a :=
Quotient.hrecOn a.1 (fun a h => ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(fun a b hab => hfunext (by rw [Quotient.sound hab]) fun _ _ _ =>
heq_of_eq (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))
a.2
invFun a :=
Quotient.liftOn a (fun a => (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : { x // p₂ x })) fun _ _ hab =>
Subtype.ext_val (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))
left_inv := by exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn a (fun b hb => rfl) ha
right_inv a := by exact Quotient.inductionOn a fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y)
(x hx) : subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h ⟨⟦x⟧, hx⟩ = ⟦⟨x, (hp₂ _).2 hx⟩⟧ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) (x) :
(subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h).symm ⟦x⟧ = ⟨⟦x⟧, (hp₂ _).1 x.property⟩ :=
rfl
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- A helper function for `Equiv.swap`. -/
def swapCore (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b else if r = b then a else r
theorem swapCore_self (r a : α) : swapCore a a r = r := by
unfold swapCore
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
theorem swapCore_swapCore (r a b : α) : swapCore a b (swapCore a b r) = r := by
unfold swapCore; split_ifs <;> cc
theorem swapCore_comm (r a b : α) : swapCore a b r = swapCore b a r := by
unfold swapCore; split_ifs <;> cc
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : Perm α :=
⟨swapCore a b, swapCore a b, fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b,
fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b⟩
@[simp]
theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun r => swapCore_self r a
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext fun r => swapCore_comm r _ _
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a := by
by_cases h : b = a <;> simp [swap_apply_def, h]
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x := by
simp +contextual [swap_apply_def]
theorem eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self {a b x : α} (h : swap a b x ≠ x) : x = a ∨ x = b := by
contrapose! h
exact swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h.1 h.2
@[simp]
theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun _ => swapCore_swapCore _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = Equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => (Equiv.refl _).injective ?_, fun h => h ▸ swap_self _⟩
rw [← h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : Perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x := by
cases π
rfl
theorem swap_eq_update (i j : α) : (Equiv.swap i j : α → α) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext fun x => by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, Equiv.swap_apply_def, id]
theorem comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ Equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) := by
rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_swap_trans [DecidableEq β] (a b : α) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.symm.trans (swap a b)).trans e = swap (e a) (e b) :=
Equiv.ext fun x => by
have : ∀ a, e.symm x = a ↔ x = e a := fun a => by
rw [@eq_comm _ (e.symm x)]
constructor <;> intros <;> simp_all
simp only [trans_apply, swap_apply_def, this]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem trans_swap_trans_symm [DecidableEq β] (a b : β) (e : α ≃ β) :
(e.trans (swap a b)).trans e.symm = swap (e.symm a) (e.symm b) :=
symm_trans_swap_trans a b e.symm
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_self (i j a : α) : swap i j (swap i j a) = a := by
rw [← Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.swap_swap, Equiv.refl_apply]
/-- A function is invariant to a swap if it is equal at both elements -/
theorem apply_swap_eq_self {v : α → β} {i j : α} (hv : v i = v j) (k : α) :
v (swap i j k) = v k := by
by_cases hi : k = i
· rw [hi, swap_apply_left, hv]
by_cases hj : k = j
· rw [hj, swap_apply_right, hv]
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hi hj]
theorem swap_apply_eq_iff {x y z w : α} : swap x y z = w ↔ z = swap x y w := by
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, symm_swap]
theorem swap_apply_ne_self_iff {a b x : α} : swap a b x ≠ x ↔ a ≠ b ∧ (x = a ∨ x = b) := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
by_cases hax : x = a
· simp [hax, eq_comm]
by_cases hbx : x = b
· simp [hbx]
simp [hab, hax, hbx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
namespace Perm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_swap_refl {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : α) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.swap i j) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inl i) (Sum.inl j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inl, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inl.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl_swap {α β : Sort _} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (i j : β) :
Equiv.Perm.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.swap i j) = Equiv.swap (Sum.inr i) (Sum.inr j) := by
ext x
cases x
· simp [Sum.map, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· simp only [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map, coe_refl, comp_id, Sum.elim_inr, comp_apply,
swap_apply_def, Sum.inr.injEq]
split_ifs <;> rfl
end Perm
/-- Augment an equivalence with a prescribed mapping `f a = b` -/
def setValue (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : α ≃ β :=
(swap a (f.symm b)).trans f
@[simp]
theorem setValue_eq (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : β) : setValue f a b a = b := by
simp [setValue, swap_apply_left]
end Swap
end Equiv
namespace Function.Involutive
/-- Convert an involutive function `f` to a permutation with `toFun = invFun = f`. -/
def toPerm (f : α → α) (h : Involutive f) : Equiv.Perm α :=
⟨f, f, h.leftInverse, h.rightInverse⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPerm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f : α → α) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPerm_symm {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : (h.toPerm f).symm = h.toPerm f :=
rfl
theorem toPerm_involutive {f : α → α} (h : Involutive f) : Involutive (h.toPerm f) :=
h
theorem symm_eq_self_of_involutive (f : Equiv.Perm α) (h : Involutive f) : f.symm = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective (h.leftInverse_iff.mp f.left_inv)
end Function.Involutive
theorem PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq {x : PLift α} {y : α} : x = PLift.up y ↔ x.down = y :=
Equiv.plift.eq_symm_apply
theorem Function.Injective.map_swap [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
f (Equiv.swap x y z) = Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
conv_rhs => rw [Equiv.swap_apply_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [hf h₁, Equiv.swap_apply_left]
· rw [hf h₂, Equiv.swap_apply_right]
· rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (mt (congr_arg f) h₁) (mt (congr_arg f) h₂)]
namespace Equiv
section
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equivalence of the base space.
-/
@[simps apply, simps -isSimp symm_apply]
def piCongrLeft' (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) : (∀ a, P a) ≃ ∀ b, P (e.symm b) where
toFun f x := f (e.symm x)
invFun f x := (e.symm_apply_apply x).ndrec (f (e x))
left_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), h.ndrec (f y) = f x) (e.symm_apply_apply x)
right_inv f := funext fun x =>
(by rintro _ rfl; rfl : ∀ {y} (h : y = x), (congr_arg e.symm h).ndrec (f y) = f x)
(e.apply_symm_apply x)
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e.symm (e a) = a` in the statement of this lemma. -/
add_decl_doc Equiv.piCongrLeft'_symm_apply
/-- This lemma is impractical to state in the dependent case. -/
@[simp]
theorem piCongrLeft'_symm (P : Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) :
(piCongrLeft' (fun _ => P) e).symm = piCongrLeft' _ e.symm := by ext; simp [piCongrLeft']
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g a = g (e a)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P a` while the RHS would have type `P (e.symm (e a))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `a` is of the form `e.symm b`, so we can use `g b` instead of
`g (e (e.symm b))`. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β) (g : ∀ b, P (e.symm b)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft' P e).symm g (e.symm b) = g b := by
rw [piCongrLeft'_symm_apply, ← heq_iff_eq, rec_heq_iff_heq]
exact congr_arg_heq _ (e.apply_symm_apply _)
end
section
variable (P : β → Sort w) (e : α ≃ β)
/-- Transporting dependent functions through an equivalence of the base,
expressed as a "simplification".
-/
def piCongrLeft : (∀ a, P (e a)) ≃ ∀ b, P b :=
(piCongrLeft' P e.symm).symm
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. For that reason,
we have to explicitly substitute along `e (e.symm b) = b` in the statement of this lemma. -/
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (b : β) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f b = e.apply_symm_apply b ▸ f (e.symm b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma piCongrLeft_symm_apply (g : ∀ b, P b) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e).symm g a = g (e a) :=
piCongrLeft'_apply P e.symm g a
/-- Note: the "obvious" statement `(piCongrLeft P e) f b = f (e.symm b)` doesn't typecheck: the
LHS would have type `P b` while the RHS would have type `P (e (e.symm b))`. This lemma is a way
around it in the case where `b` is of the form `e a`, so we can use `f a` instead of
`f (e.symm (e a))`. -/
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, P (e a)) (a : α) :
(piCongrLeft P e) f (e a) = f a :=
piCongrLeft'_symm_apply_apply P e.symm f a
open Sum
lemma piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast {P : β → Sort v} {e : α ≃ β}
(f : (a : α) → P (e a)) (b : β) :
piCongrLeft P e f b = cast (congr_arg P (e.apply_symm_apply b)) (f (e.symm b)) :=
Eq.rec_eq_cast _ _
theorem piCongrLeft_sumInl {ι ι' ι''} (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (i : ι) :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inl i)) = f i := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inl i)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
theorem piCongrLeft_sumInr {ι ι' ι''} (π : ι'' → Type*) (e : ι ⊕ ι' ≃ ι'') (f : ∀ i, π (e (inl i)))
(g : ∀ i, π (e (inr i))) (j : ι') :
piCongrLeft π e (sumPiEquivProdPi (fun x => π (e x)) |>.symm (f, g)) (e (inr j)) = g j := by
simp_rw [piCongrLeft_apply_eq_cast, sumPiEquivProdPi_symm_apply,
sum_rec_congr _ _ _ (e.symm_apply_apply (inr j)), cast_cast, cast_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias piCongrLeft_sum_inl := piCongrLeft_sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias piCongrLeft_sum_inr := piCongrLeft_sumInr
end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ a : α, W a ≃ Z (h₁ a))
/-- Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibers.
-/
def piCongr : (∀ a, W a) ≃ ∀ b, Z b :=
(Equiv.piCongrRight h₂).trans (Equiv.piCongrLeft _ h₁)
@[simp]
theorem coe_piCongr_symm : ((h₁.piCongr h₂).symm :
(∀ b, Z b) → ∀ a, W a) = fun f a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
theorem piCongr_symm_apply (f : ∀ b, Z b) :
(h₁.piCongr h₂).symm f = fun a => (h₂ a).symm (f (h₁ a)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem piCongr_apply_apply (f : ∀ a, W a) (a : α) : h₁.piCongr h₂ f (h₁ a) = h₂ a (f a) := by
simp only [piCongr, piCongrRight, trans_apply, coe_fn_mk, piCongrLeft_apply_apply, Pi.map_apply]
end
section
variable {W : α → Sort w} {Z : β → Sort z} (h₁ : α ≃ β) (h₂ : ∀ b : β, W (h₁.symm b) ≃ Z b)
/-- Transport dependent functions through
an equivalence of the base spaces and a family
of equivalences of the matching fibres.
-/
def piCongr' : (∀ a, W a) ≃ ∀ b, Z b :=
(piCongr h₁.symm fun b => (h₂ b).symm).symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_piCongr' :
(h₁.piCongr' h₂ : (∀ a, W a) → ∀ b, Z b) = fun f b => h₂ b <| f <| h₁.symm b :=
rfl
theorem piCongr'_apply (f : ∀ a, W a) : h₁.piCongr' h₂ f = fun b => h₂ b <| f <| h₁.symm b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem piCongr'_symm_apply_symm_apply (f : ∀ b, Z b) (b : β) :
(h₁.piCongr' h₂).symm f (h₁.symm b) = (h₂ b).symm (f b) := by
simp [piCongr', piCongr_apply_apply]
end
/-- Transport dependent functions through an equality of sets. -/
@[simps!] def piCongrSet {α} {W : α → Sort w} {s t : Set α} (h : s = t) :
(∀ i : {i // i ∈ s}, W i) ≃ (∀ i : {i // i ∈ t}, W i) where
toFun f i := f ⟨i, h ▸ i.2⟩
invFun f i := f ⟨i, h.symm ▸ i.2⟩
left_inv f := rfl
right_inv f := rfl
section BinaryOp
variable {α₁ β₁ : Type*} (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₁ → α₁ → α₁)
theorem semiconj_conj (f : α₁ → α₁) : Semiconj e f (e.conj f) := fun x => by simp
theorem semiconj₂_conj : Semiconj₂ e f (e.arrowCongr e.conj f) := fun x y => by simp [arrowCongr]
instance [Std.Associative f] : Std.Associative (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).isAssociative_right e.surjective
instance [Std.IdempotentOp f] : Std.IdempotentOp (e.arrowCongr (e.arrowCongr e) f) :=
(e.semiconj₂_conj f).isIdempotent_right e.surjective
end BinaryOp
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem ulift_symm_down {α} (x : α) : (Equiv.ulift.{u, v}.symm x).down = x :=
rfl
end ULift
end Equiv
theorem Function.Injective.swap_apply
[DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x y z : α) :
Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) (f z) = f (Equiv.swap x y z) := by
by_cases hx : z = x
· simp [hx]
by_cases hy : z = y
· simp [hy]
rw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx hy, Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (hf.ne hx) (hf.ne hy)]
theorem Function.Injective.swap_comp
[DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x y : α) :
Equiv.swap (f x) (f y) ∘ f = f ∘ Equiv.swap x y :=
funext fun _ => hf.swap_apply _ _ _
/-- To give an equivalence between two subsingleton types, it is sufficient to give any two
functions between them. -/
def equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- A nonempty subsingleton type is (noncomputably) equivalent to `PUnit`. -/
noncomputable def Equiv.punitOfNonemptyOfSubsingleton [h : Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] :
α ≃ PUnit :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun _ => PUnit.unit) fun _ => h.some
/-- `Unique (Unique α)` is equivalent to `Unique α`. -/
def uniqueUniqueEquiv : Unique (Unique α) ≃ Unique α :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun h => h.default) fun h =>
{ default := h, uniq := fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
/-- If `Unique β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `α ≃ β`. -/
def uniqueEquivEquivUnique (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) [Unique β] : Unique α ≃ (α ≃ β) :=
equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun _ => Equiv.ofUnique _ _) Equiv.unique
namespace Function
variable {α' : Sort*}
theorem update_comp_equiv [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β)
(g : α' ≃ α) (a : α) (v : β) :
update f a v ∘ g = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v := by
rw [← update_comp_eq_of_injective _ g.injective, g.apply_symm_apply]
theorem update_apply_equiv_apply [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β)
(g : α' ≃ α) (a : α) (v : β) (a' : α') : update f a v (g a') = update (f ∘ g) (g.symm a) v a' :=
congr_fun (update_comp_equiv f g a v) a'
theorem piCongrLeft'_update [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β)
(f : ∀ a, P a) (b : β) (x : P (e.symm b)) :
e.piCongrLeft' P (update f (e.symm b) x) = update (e.piCongrLeft' P f) b x := by
ext b'
rcases eq_or_ne b' b with (rfl | h) <;> simp_all
theorem piCongrLeft'_symm_update [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (P : α → Sort*) (e : α ≃ β)
(f : ∀ b, P (e.symm b)) (b : β) (x : P (e.symm b)) :
(e.piCongrLeft' P).symm (update f b x) = update ((e.piCongrLeft' P).symm f) (e.symm b) x := by
simp [(e.piCongrLeft' P).symm_apply_eq, piCongrLeft'_update]
end Function
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Basic.lean | 1,681 | 1,682 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
|
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 356 | 358 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.Algebra.GradedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.WeightedHomogeneous
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# Homogeneous polynomials
A multivariate polynomial `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`
if all monomials occurring in `φ` have degree `n`.
## Main definitions/lemmas
* `IsHomogeneous φ n`: a predicate that asserts that `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`.
* `homogeneousSubmodule σ R n`: the submodule of homogeneous polynomials of degree `n`.
* `homogeneousComponent n`: the additive morphism that projects polynomials onto
their summand that is homogeneous of degree `n`.
* `sum_homogeneousComponent`: every polynomial is the sum of its homogeneous components.
-/
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*} {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
/-
TODO
* show that `MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, homogeneousSubmodule σ R i`
-/
open Finsupp
/-- A multivariate polynomial `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`
if all monomials occurring in `φ` have degree `n`. -/
def IsHomogeneous [CommSemiring R] (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :=
IsWeightedHomogeneous 1 φ n
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem weightedTotalDegree_one (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
weightedTotalDegree (1 : σ → ℕ) φ = φ.totalDegree := by
simp only [totalDegree, weightedTotalDegree, weight, LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe,
linearCombination, Pi.one_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_smulRight, LinearMap.id_coe,
id, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem weightedTotalDegree_rename_of_injective {σ τ : Type*} {e : σ → τ}
{w : τ → ℕ} {P : MvPolynomial σ R} (he : Function.Injective e) :
weightedTotalDegree w (rename e P) = weightedTotalDegree (w ∘ e) P := by
classical
unfold weightedTotalDegree
rw [support_rename_of_injective he, Finset.sup_image]
congr; ext; unfold weight; simp
variable (σ R)
/-- The submodule of homogeneous `MvPolynomial`s of degree `n`. -/
def homogeneousSubmodule (n : ℕ) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) where
carrier := { x | x.IsHomogeneous n }
smul_mem' r a ha c hc := by
rw [coeff_smul] at hc
apply ha
intro h
apply hc
rw [h]
exact smul_zero r
zero_mem' _ hd := False.elim (hd <| coeff_zero _)
add_mem' {a b} ha hb c hc := by
rw [coeff_add] at hc
obtain h | h : coeff c a ≠ 0 ∨ coeff c b ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
simp only [hc, add_zero]
· exact ha h
· exact hb h
@[simp]
lemma weightedHomogeneousSubmodule_one (n : ℕ) :
weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R 1 n = homogeneousSubmodule σ R n := rfl
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_homogeneousSubmodule (n : ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p ∈ homogeneousSubmodule σ R n ↔ p.IsHomogeneous n := Iff.rfl
variable (σ R)
/-- While equal, the former has a convenient definitional reduction. -/
theorem homogeneousSubmodule_eq_finsupp_supported (n : ℕ) :
homogeneousSubmodule σ R n = Finsupp.supported _ R { d | d.degree = n } := by
simp_rw [degree_eq_weight_one]
exact weightedHomogeneousSubmodule_eq_finsupp_supported R 1 n
variable {σ R}
theorem homogeneousSubmodule_mul (m n : ℕ) :
homogeneousSubmodule σ R m * homogeneousSubmodule σ R n ≤ homogeneousSubmodule σ R (m + n) :=
weightedHomogeneousSubmodule_mul 1 m n
section
theorem isHomogeneous_monomial {d : σ →₀ ℕ} (r : R) {n : ℕ} (hn : d.degree = n) :
IsHomogeneous (monomial d r) n := by
rw [degree_eq_weight_one] at hn
exact isWeightedHomogeneous_monomial 1 d r hn
variable (σ)
theorem totalDegree_eq_zero_iff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.totalDegree = 0 ↔ ∀ (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (_ : m ∈ p.support) (x : σ), m x = 0 := by
rw [← weightedTotalDegree_one, weightedTotalDegree_eq_zero_iff _ p]
exact nonTorsionWeight_of (Function.const σ one_ne_zero)
theorem totalDegree_zero_iff_isHomogeneous {p : MvPolynomial σ R} :
p.totalDegree = 0 ↔ IsHomogeneous p 0 := by
rw [← weightedTotalDegree_one,
← isWeightedHomogeneous_zero_iff_weightedTotalDegree_eq_zero, IsHomogeneous]
alias ⟨isHomogeneous_of_totalDegree_zero, _⟩ := totalDegree_zero_iff_isHomogeneous
theorem isHomogeneous_C (r : R) : IsHomogeneous (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) 0 := by
apply isHomogeneous_monomial
simp only [Finsupp.degree, Finsupp.zero_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero]
variable (R)
theorem isHomogeneous_zero (n : ℕ) : IsHomogeneous (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) n :=
(homogeneousSubmodule σ R n).zero_mem
theorem isHomogeneous_one : IsHomogeneous (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) 0 :=
isHomogeneous_C _ _
variable {σ}
theorem isHomogeneous_X (i : σ) : IsHomogeneous (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) 1 := by
apply isHomogeneous_monomial
rw [Finsupp.degree, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ one_ne_zero, Finset.sum_singleton]
exact Finsupp.single_eq_same
end
namespace IsHomogeneous
variable [CommSemiring S] {φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R} {m n : ℕ}
theorem coeff_eq_zero (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) {d : σ →₀ ℕ} (hd : d.degree ≠ n) :
coeff d φ = 0 := by
rw [degree_eq_weight_one] at hd
exact IsWeightedHomogeneous.coeff_eq_zero hφ d hd
theorem inj_right (hm : IsHomogeneous φ m) (hn : IsHomogeneous φ n) (hφ : φ ≠ 0) : m = n := by
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ : ∃ d, coeff d φ ≠ 0 := exists_coeff_ne_zero hφ
rw [← hm hd, ← hn hd]
theorem add (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) (hψ : IsHomogeneous ψ n) : IsHomogeneous (φ + ψ) n :=
(homogeneousSubmodule σ R n).add_mem hφ hψ
theorem sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (φ : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsHomogeneous (φ i) n) : IsHomogeneous (∑ i ∈ s, φ i) n :=
(homogeneousSubmodule σ R n).sum_mem h
theorem mul (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ m) (hψ : IsHomogeneous ψ n) : IsHomogeneous (φ * ψ) (m + n) :=
homogeneousSubmodule_mul m n <| Submodule.mul_mem_mul hφ hψ
theorem prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (φ : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ι → ℕ)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsHomogeneous (φ i) (n i)) : IsHomogeneous (∏ i ∈ s, φ i) (∑ i ∈ s, n i) := by
classical
revert h
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
simp only [isHomogeneous_one, Finset.sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty]
· intro i s his IH h
simp only [his, Finset.prod_insert, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
apply (h i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)).mul (IH _)
intro j hjs
exact h j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hjs)
lemma C_mul (hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous m) (r : R) :
(C r * φ).IsHomogeneous m := by
simpa only [zero_add] using (isHomogeneous_C _ _).mul hφ
lemma _root_.MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X (r : R) (i : σ) :
(C r * X i).IsHomogeneous 1 :=
(isHomogeneous_X _ _).C_mul _
lemma pow (hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous m) (n : ℕ) : (φ ^ n).IsHomogeneous (m * n) := by
rw [show φ ^ n = ∏ _i ∈ Finset.range n, φ by simp]
rw [show m * n = ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range n, m by simp [mul_comm]]
apply IsHomogeneous.prod _ _ _ (fun _ _ ↦ hφ)
lemma _root_.MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_X_pow (i : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) i ^ n).IsHomogeneous n := by
simpa only [one_mul] using (isHomogeneous_X _ _).pow n
lemma _root_.MvPolynomial.isHomogeneous_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (i : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(C r * X i ^ n).IsHomogeneous n :=
(isHomogeneous_X_pow _ _).C_mul _
lemma eval₂ (hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous m) (f : R →+* MvPolynomial τ S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ S)
(hf : ∀ r, (f r).IsHomogeneous 0) (hg : ∀ i, (g i).IsHomogeneous n) :
(eval₂ f g φ).IsHomogeneous (n * m) := by
apply IsHomogeneous.sum
intro i hi
rw [← zero_add (n * m)]
apply IsHomogeneous.mul (hf _) _
convert IsHomogeneous.prod _ _ (fun k ↦ n * i k) _
· rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [← Finset.mul_sum, ← hφ hi, weight_apply]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, Finsupp.sum, Pi.one_apply, mul_one]
· rintro k -
apply (hg k).pow
lemma map (hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous n) (f : R →+* S) : (map f φ).IsHomogeneous n := by
simpa only [one_mul] using hφ.eval₂ _ _ (fun r ↦ isHomogeneous_C _ (f r)) (isHomogeneous_X _)
lemma aeval [Algebra R S] (hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous m)
(g : σ → MvPolynomial τ S) (hg : ∀ i, (g i).IsHomogeneous n) :
(aeval g φ).IsHomogeneous (n * m) :=
hφ.eval₂ _ _ (fun _ ↦ isHomogeneous_C _ _) hg
section CommRing
-- In this section we shadow the semiring `R` with a ring `R`.
variable {R σ : Type*} [CommRing R] {φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ}
theorem neg (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) : IsHomogeneous (-φ) n :=
(homogeneousSubmodule σ R n).neg_mem hφ
theorem sub (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) (hψ : IsHomogeneous ψ n) : IsHomogeneous (φ - ψ) n :=
(homogeneousSubmodule σ R n).sub_mem hφ hψ
end CommRing
/-- The homogeneous degree bounds the total degree.
See also `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.totalDegree` when `φ` is non-zero. -/
lemma totalDegree_le (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) : φ.totalDegree ≤ n := by
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
simp_rw [Finsupp.sum, ← hφ hd, weight_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Finsupp.sum,
le_rfl]
theorem totalDegree (hφ : IsHomogeneous φ n) (h : φ ≠ 0) : totalDegree φ = n := by
apply le_antisymm hφ.totalDegree_le
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ : ∃ d, coeff d φ ≠ 0 := exists_coeff_ne_zero h
simp only [← hφ hd, MvPolynomial.totalDegree, Finsupp.sum]
replace hd := Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr hd
simp only [weight_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
-- Porting note: Original proof did not define `f`
exact Finset.le_sup (f := fun s ↦ ∑ x ∈ s.support, s x) hd
theorem rename_isHomogeneous {f : σ → τ} (h : φ.IsHomogeneous n) :
(rename f φ).IsHomogeneous n := by
rw [← φ.support_sum_monomial_coeff, map_sum]; simp_rw [rename_monomial]
apply IsHomogeneous.sum _ _ _ fun d hd ↦ isHomogeneous_monomial _ _
intro d hd
apply (Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom fun _ ↦ .id ℕ).trans
convert h (mem_support_iff.mp hd)
simp only [weight_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem rename_isHomogeneous_iff {f : σ → τ} (hf : f.Injective) :
(rename f φ).IsHomogeneous n ↔ φ.IsHomogeneous n := by
refine ⟨fun h d hd ↦ ?_, rename_isHomogeneous⟩
convert ← @h (d.mapDomain f) _
· simp only [weight_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
exact Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index_inj (h := fun _ ↦ id) hf
· rwa [coeff_rename_mapDomain f hf]
lemma finSuccEquiv_coeff_isHomogeneous {N : ℕ} {φ : MvPolynomial (Fin (N+1)) R} {n : ℕ}
(hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous n) (i j : ℕ) (h : i + j = n) :
((finSuccEquiv _ _ φ).coeff i).IsHomogeneous j := by
intro d hd
rw [finSuccEquiv_coeff_coeff] at hd
have h' : (weight 1) (Finsupp.cons i d) = i + j := by
simpa [Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff (g := d.cons i)
(d.cons_support (y := i)) (by simp) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl), ← h] using hφ hd
simp only [weight_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Finsupp.sum_cons,
add_right_inj] at h' ⊢
exact h'
-- TODO: develop API for `optionEquivLeft` and get rid of the `[Fintype σ]` assumption
lemma coeff_isHomogeneous_of_optionEquivLeft_symm
[hσ : Finite σ] {p : Polynomial (MvPolynomial σ R)}
(hp : ((optionEquivLeft R σ).symm p).IsHomogeneous n) (i j : ℕ) (h : i + j = n) :
(p.coeff i).IsHomogeneous j := by
obtain ⟨k, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin σ
let e' := e.optionCongr.trans (_root_.finSuccEquiv _).symm
let F := renameEquiv R e
let F' := renameEquiv R e'
let φ := F' ((optionEquivLeft R σ).symm p)
have hφ : φ.IsHomogeneous n := hp.rename_isHomogeneous
suffices IsHomogeneous (F (p.coeff i)) j by
rwa [← (IsHomogeneous.rename_isHomogeneous_iff e.injective)]
convert hφ.finSuccEquiv_coeff_isHomogeneous i j h using 1
dsimp only [φ, F', F, renameEquiv_apply]
rw [finSuccEquiv_rename_finSuccEquiv, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
simp
open Polynomial in
private
lemma exists_eval_ne_zero_of_coeff_finSuccEquiv_ne_zero_aux
{N : ℕ} {F : MvPolynomial (Fin (Nat.succ N)) R} {n : ℕ} (hF : IsHomogeneous F n)
(hFn : ((finSuccEquiv R N) F).coeff n ≠ 0) :
∃ r, eval r F ≠ 0 := by
have hF₀ : F ≠ 0 := by contrapose! hFn; simp [hFn]
have hdeg : natDegree (finSuccEquiv R N F) < n + 1 := by
linarith [natDegree_finSuccEquiv F, degreeOf_le_totalDegree F 0, hF.totalDegree hF₀]
use Fin.cons 1 0
have aux : ∀ i ∈ Finset.range n, constantCoeff ((finSuccEquiv R N F).coeff i) = 0 := by
intro i hi
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
apply (hF.finSuccEquiv_coeff_isHomogeneous i (n-i) (by omega)).coeff_eq_zero
simp only [Finsupp.degree_zero]
rw [← Nat.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt] at hi
exact hi.symm
simp_rw [eval_eq_eval_mv_eval', eval_one_map, Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range' hdeg,
eval_zero, one_pow, mul_one, map_sum, Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_eq_zero aux, zero_add]
contrapose! hFn
ext d
rw [coeff_zero]
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· apply hFn
· contrapose! hd
ext i
rw [Finsupp.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
by_cases hi : i ∈ d.support
· have := hF.finSuccEquiv_coeff_isHomogeneous n 0 (add_zero _) hd
simp only [weight_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, Finsupp.sum] at this
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (fun _ _ ↦ zero_le')] at this
exact this i hi
· simpa using hi
section IsDomain
-- In this section we shadow the semiring `R` with a domain `R`.
variable {R σ : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {F G : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ}
open Cardinal Polynomial
private
lemma exists_eval_ne_zero_of_totalDegree_le_card_aux {N : ℕ} {F : MvPolynomial (Fin N) R} {n : ℕ}
(hF : F.IsHomogeneous n) (hF₀ : F ≠ 0) (hnR : n ≤ #R) :
∃ r, eval r F ≠ 0 := by
induction N generalizing n with
| zero =>
use 0
contrapose! hF₀
ext d
simpa only [Subsingleton.elim d 0, eval_zero, coeff_zero] using hF₀
| succ N IH =>
have hdeg : natDegree (finSuccEquiv R N F) < n + 1 := by
linarith [natDegree_finSuccEquiv F, degreeOf_le_totalDegree F 0, hF.totalDegree hF₀]
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i : ℕ, (finSuccEquiv R N F).coeff i ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hF₀
exact (finSuccEquiv _ _).injective <| Polynomial.ext <| by simpa using hF₀
have hin : i ≤ n := by
contrapose! hi
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hdeg).trans_lt hi
obtain hFn | hFn := ne_or_eq ((finSuccEquiv R N F).coeff n) 0
· exact hF.exists_eval_ne_zero_of_coeff_finSuccEquiv_ne_zero_aux hFn
have hin : i < n := hin.lt_or_eq.elim id <| by aesop
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ : ∃ j, i + (j + 1) = n := (Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hin).imp <| by omega
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ : ∃ r, (eval r) (Polynomial.coeff ((finSuccEquiv R N) F) i) ≠ 0 :=
IH (hF.finSuccEquiv_coeff_isHomogeneous _ _ hj) hi (.trans (by norm_cast; omega) hnR)
set φ : R[X] := Polynomial.map (eval r) (finSuccEquiv _ _ F) with hφ
have hφ₀ : φ ≠ 0 := fun hφ₀ ↦ hr <| by
rw [← coeff_eval_eq_eval_coeff, ← hφ, hφ₀, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
have hφR : φ.natDegree < #R := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hnR
norm_cast
refine lt_of_le_of_lt natDegree_map_le ?_
suffices (finSuccEquiv _ _ F).natDegree ≠ n by omega
rintro rfl
refine leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr ?_ hFn
simpa using (finSuccEquiv R N).injective.ne hF₀
obtain ⟨r₀, hr₀⟩ : ∃ r₀, Polynomial.eval r₀ φ ≠ 0 :=
φ.exists_eval_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card hφ₀ hφR
use Fin.cons r₀ r
rwa [eval_eq_eval_mv_eval']
/-- See `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero`
for a version that assumes `Infinite R`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero_of_le_card
(hF : F.IsHomogeneous n) (h : ∀ r : σ → R, eval r F = 0) (hnR : n ≤ #R) :
F = 0 := by
contrapose! h
-- reduce to the case where σ is finite
obtain ⟨k, f, hf, F, rfl⟩ := exists_fin_rename F
have hF₀ : F ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at h
have hF : F.IsHomogeneous n := by rwa [rename_isHomogeneous_iff hf] at hF
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_eval_ne_zero_of_totalDegree_le_card_aux hF hF₀ hnR
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := (Function.factorsThrough_iff _).mp <| (hf.factorsThrough r)
use r
rwa [eval_rename]
/-- See `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.funext`
for a version that assumes `Infinite R`. -/
lemma funext_of_le_card (hF : F.IsHomogeneous n) (hG : G.IsHomogeneous n)
| (h : ∀ r : σ → R, eval r F = eval r G) (hnR : n ≤ #R) :
F = G := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero_of_le_card (hF.sub hG) _ hnR
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using h
/-- See `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero_of_le_card`
for a version that assumes `n ≤ #R`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero [Infinite R] {F : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ}
(hF : F.IsHomogeneous n) (h : ∀ r : σ → R, eval r F = 0) : F = 0 := by
apply eq_zero_of_forall_eval_eq_zero_of_le_card hF h
exact (Cardinal.nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans <| Cardinal.infinite_iff.mp ‹Infinite R›
/-- See `MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous.funext_of_le_card`
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Homogeneous.lean | 409 | 422 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series in one variable - Truncation
`PowerSeries.trunc n φ` truncates a (univariate) formal power series
to the polynomial that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m < n`,
and `0` otherwise.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Trunc
variable [Semiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : R[X] :=
∑ m ∈ Ico 0 n, Polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
theorem coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m < n then coeff R m φ else 0 := by
simp [trunc, Polynomial.coeff_sum, Polynomial.coeff_monomial, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, LinearMap.map_zero, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_one (n) : trunc (n + 1) (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one, Polynomial.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h _ h'
· rfl
· rfl
· subst h'; simp at h
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc (n + 1) (C R a) = Polynomial.C a :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, Polynomial.coeff_C]
split_ifs with H <;> first |rfl|try simp_all
@[simp]
theorem trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
simp only [coeff_trunc, AddMonoidHom.map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add]
split_ifs with H
· rfl
· rw [zero_add]
theorem trunc_succ (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n.succ f = trunc n f + Polynomial.monomial n (coeff R n f) := by
rw [trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range, sum_range_succ, trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range]
theorem natDegree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc (n + 1) f).natDegree < n + 1 := by
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [lt_succ, ← not_lt] at h
contradiction
· rfl
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero' {f : R⟦X⟧} : trunc 0 f = 0 := rfl
theorem degree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc n f).degree < n := by
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [← not_le] at h
contradiction
· rfl
theorem eval₂_trunc_eq_sum_range {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (s : S) (G : R →+* S) (n) (f : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n f).eval₂ G s = ∑ i ∈ range n, G (coeff R i f) * s ^ i := by
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [trunc_zero', range_zero, sum_empty, eval₂_zero]
| succ n =>
have := natDegree_trunc_lt f n
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range' (hn := this)]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro _ h
rw [mem_range] at h
congr
rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem trunc_X (n) : trunc (n + 2) X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [h₂, coeff_X_one]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one h₂]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one]
intro hd
apply h₁
rw [hd]
exact n.one_lt_succ_succ
lemma trunc_X_of {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : trunc n X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n =>
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact trunc_X n
@[simp]
lemma trunc_one_left (p : R⟦X⟧) : trunc (R := R) 1 p = .C (coeff R 0 p) := by
| ext i; simp +contextual [coeff_trunc, Polynomial.coeff_C]
lemma trunc_one_X : trunc (R := R) 1 X = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
lemma trunc_C_mul (n : ℕ) (r : R) (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (C R r * f) = .C r * trunc n f := by
ext i; simp [coeff_trunc]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Trunc.lean | 134 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# `norm_num` plugin for big operators
This file adds `norm_num` plugins for `Finset.prod` and `Finset.sum`.
The driving part of this plugin is `Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.evalFinsetBigop`.
We repeatedly use `Finset.proveEmptyOrCons` to try to find a proof that the given set is empty,
or that it consists of one element inserted into a strict subset, and evaluate the big operator
on that subset until the set is completely exhausted.
## See also
* The `fin_cases` tactic has similar scope: splitting out a finite collection into its elements.
## Porting notes
This plugin is noticeably less powerful than the equivalent version in Mathlib 3: the design of
`norm_num` means plugins have to return numerals, rather than a generic expression.
In particular, we can't use the plugin on sums containing variables.
(See also the TODO note "To support variables".)
## TODO
* Support intervals: `Finset.Ico`, `Finset.Icc`, ...
* To support variables, like in Mathlib 3, turn this into a standalone tactic that unfolds
the sum/prod, without computing its numeric value (using the `ring` tactic to do some
normalization?)
-/
namespace Mathlib.Meta
open Lean
open Meta
open Qq
variable {u v : Level}
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression `n : Q(ℕ)`
is either `zero` or `succ`. -/
inductive Nat.UnifyZeroOrSuccResult (n : Q(ℕ))
/-- `n` unifies with `0` -/
| zero (pf : $n =Q 0)
/-- `n` unifies with `succ n'` for this specific `n'` -/
| succ (n' : Q(ℕ)) (pf : $n =Q Nat.succ $n')
/-- Determine whether the expression `n : Q(ℕ)` unifies with `0` or `Nat.succ n'`.
We do not use `norm_num` functionality because we want definitional equality,
not propositional equality, for use in dependent types.
Fails if neither of the options succeed.
-/
def Nat.unifyZeroOrSucc (n : Q(ℕ)) : MetaM (Nat.UnifyZeroOrSuccResult n) := do
match ← isDefEqQ n q(0) with
| .defEq pf => return .zero pf
| .notDefEq => do
let n' : Q(ℕ) ← mkFreshExprMVar q(ℕ)
let ⟨(_pf : $n =Q Nat.succ $n')⟩ ← assertDefEqQ n q(Nat.succ $n')
let (.some (n'_val : Q(ℕ))) ← getExprMVarAssignment? n'.mvarId! |
throwError "could not figure out value of `?n` from `{n} =?= Nat.succ ?n`"
pure (.succ n'_val ⟨⟩)
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression
`s : Q(List $α)` is either empty or consists of an element inserted into a strict subset. -/
inductive List.ProveNilOrConsResult {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(List $α))
/-- The set is Nil. -/
| nil (pf : Q($s = []))
/-- The set equals `a` inserted into the strict subset `s'`. -/
| cons (a : Q($α)) (s' : Q(List $α)) (pf : Q($s = List.cons $a $s'))
/-- If `s` unifies with `t`, convert a result for `s` to a result for `t`.
If `s` does not unify with `t`, this results in a type-incorrect proof.
-/
def List.ProveNilOrConsResult.uncheckedCast {α : Q(Type u)} {β : Q(Type v)}
(s : Q(List $α)) (t : Q(List $β)) :
List.ProveNilOrConsResult s → List.ProveNilOrConsResult t
| .nil pf => .nil pf
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' pf
/-- If `s = t` and we can get the result for `t`, then we can get the result for `s`.
-/
def List.ProveNilOrConsResult.eq_trans {α : Q(Type u)} {s t : Q(List $α)}
(eq : Q($s = $t)) :
List.ProveNilOrConsResult t → List.ProveNilOrConsResult s
| .nil pf => .nil q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
lemma List.range_zero' {n : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n 0) :
List.range n = [] := by rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_zero, List.range_zero]
lemma List.range_succ_eq_map' {n nn n' : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n nn) (pn' : nn = Nat.succ n') :
List.range n = 0 :: List.map Nat.succ (List.range n') := by
rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_id, pn', List.range_succ_eq_map]
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Either show the expression `s : Q(List α)` is Nil, or remove one element from it.
Fails if we cannot determine which of the alternatives apply to the expression.
-/
partial def List.proveNilOrCons {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(List $α)) :
MetaM (List.ProveNilOrConsResult s) :=
s.withApp fun e a =>
match (e, e.constName, a) with
| (_, ``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection, _) => haveI : $s =Q {} := ⟨⟩; pure (.nil q(.refl []))
| (_, ``List.nil, _) => haveI : $s =Q [] := ⟨⟩; pure (.nil q(rfl))
| (_, ``List.cons, #[_, (a : Q($α)), (s' : Q(List $α))]) =>
haveI : $s =Q $a :: $s' := ⟨⟩; pure (.cons a s' q(rfl))
| (_, ``List.range, #[(n : Q(ℕ))]) =>
have s : Q(List ℕ) := s; .uncheckedCast _ _ <$> show MetaM (ProveNilOrConsResult s) from do
let ⟨nn, pn⟩ ← NormNum.deriveNat n _
haveI' : $s =Q .range $n := ⟨⟩
let nnL := nn.natLit!
if nnL = 0 then
haveI' : $nn =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
return .nil q(List.range_zero' $pn)
else
have n' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (nnL - 1)
have : $nn =Q .succ $n' := ⟨⟩
return .cons _ _ q(List.range_succ_eq_map' $pn (.refl $nn))
| (_, ``List.finRange, #[(n : Q(ℕ))]) =>
have s : Q(List (Fin $n)) := s
.uncheckedCast _ _ <$> show MetaM (ProveNilOrConsResult s) from do
haveI' : $s =Q .finRange $n := ⟨⟩
return match ← Nat.unifyZeroOrSucc n with -- We want definitional equality on `n`.
| .zero _pf => .nil q(List.finRange_zero)
| .succ n' _pf => .cons _ _ q(List.finRange_succ_eq_map $n')
| (.const ``List.map [v, _], _, #[(β : Q(Type v)), _, (f : Q($β → $α)), (xxs : Q(List $β))]) => do
haveI' : $s =Q ($xxs).map $f := ⟨⟩
return match ← List.proveNilOrCons xxs with
| .nil pf => .nil q(($pf ▸ List.map_nil : List.map _ _ = _))
| .cons x xs pf => .cons q($f $x) q(($xs).map $f)
q(($pf ▸ List.map_cons : List.map _ _ = _))
| (_, fn, args) =>
throwError "List.proveNilOrCons: unsupported List expression {s} ({fn}, {args})"
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression
`s : Q(Multiset $α)` is either empty or consists of an element inserted into a strict subset. -/
inductive Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(Multiset $α))
/-- The set is zero. -/
| zero (pf : Q($s = 0))
/-- The set equals `a` inserted into the strict subset `s'`. -/
| cons (a : Q($α)) (s' : Q(Multiset $α)) (pf : Q($s = Multiset.cons $a $s'))
/-- If `s` unifies with `t`, convert a result for `s` to a result for `t`.
If `s` does not unify with `t`, this results in a type-incorrect proof.
-/
def Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult.uncheckedCast {α : Q(Type u)} {β : Q(Type v)}
(s : Q(Multiset $α)) (t : Q(Multiset $β)) :
Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult s → Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult t
| .zero pf => .zero pf
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' pf
/-- If `s = t` and we can get the result for `t`, then we can get the result for `s`.
-/
def Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult.eq_trans {α : Q(Type u)} {s t : Q(Multiset $α)}
(eq : Q($s = $t)) :
Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult t → Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult s
| .zero pf => .zero q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
lemma Multiset.insert_eq_cons {α : Type*} (a : α) (s : Multiset α) :
insert a s = Multiset.cons a s :=
rfl
lemma Multiset.range_zero' {n : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n 0) :
Multiset.range n = 0 := by rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_zero, Multiset.range_zero]
lemma Multiset.range_succ' {n nn n' : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n nn) (pn' : nn = Nat.succ n') :
Multiset.range n = n' ::ₘ Multiset.range n' := by
rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_id, pn', Multiset.range_succ]
/-- Either show the expression `s : Q(Multiset α)` is Zero, or remove one element from it.
Fails if we cannot determine which of the alternatives apply to the expression.
-/
partial def Multiset.proveZeroOrCons {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(Multiset $α)) :
MetaM (Multiset.ProveZeroOrConsResult s) :=
match s.getAppFnArgs with
| (``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection, _) => haveI : $s =Q {} := ⟨⟩; pure (.zero q(rfl))
| (``Zero.zero, _) => haveI : $s =Q 0 := ⟨⟩; pure (.zero q(rfl))
| (``Multiset.cons, #[_, (a : Q($α)), (s' : Q(Multiset $α))]) =>
haveI : $s =Q .cons $a $s' := ⟨⟩
pure (.cons a s' q(rfl))
| (``Multiset.ofList, #[_, (val : Q(List $α))]) => do
haveI : $s =Q .ofList $val := ⟨⟩
return match ← List.proveNilOrCons val with
| .nil pf => .zero q($pf ▸ Multiset.coe_nil : Multiset.ofList _ = _)
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a q($s') q($pf ▸ Multiset.cons_coe $a $s' : Multiset.ofList _ = _)
| (``Multiset.range, #[(n : Q(ℕ))]) => do
have s : Q(Multiset ℕ) := s; .uncheckedCast _ _ <$> show MetaM (ProveZeroOrConsResult s) from do
let ⟨nn, pn⟩ ← NormNum.deriveNat n _
haveI' : $s =Q .range $n := ⟨⟩
let nnL := nn.natLit!
if nnL = 0 then
haveI' : $nn =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
return .zero q(Multiset.range_zero' $pn)
else
have n' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (nnL - 1)
haveI' : $nn =Q ($n').succ := ⟨⟩
return .cons _ _ q(Multiset.range_succ' $pn rfl)
| (fn, args) =>
throwError "Multiset.proveZeroOrCons: unsupported multiset expression {s} ({fn}, {args})"
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression
`s : Q(Finset $α)` is either empty or consists of an element inserted into a strict subset. -/
inductive Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(Finset $α))
/-- The set is empty. -/
| empty (pf : Q($s = ∅))
/-- The set equals `a` inserted into the strict subset `s'`. -/
| cons (a : Q($α)) (s' : Q(Finset $α)) (h : Q($a ∉ $s')) (pf : Q($s = Finset.cons $a $s' $h))
/-- If `s` unifies with `t`, convert a result for `s` to a result for `t`.
If `s` does not unify with `t`, this results in a type-incorrect proof.
-/
def Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult.uncheckedCast {α : Q(Type u)} {β : Q(Type v)}
(s : Q(Finset $α)) (t : Q(Finset $β)) :
Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult s → Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult t
| .empty pf => .empty pf
| .cons a s' h pf => .cons a s' h pf
/-- If `s = t` and we can get the result for `t`, then we can get the result for `s`.
-/
def Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult.eq_trans {α : Q(Type u)} {s t : Q(Finset $α)}
(eq : Q($s = $t)) :
Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult t → Finset.ProveEmptyOrConsResult s
| .empty pf => .empty q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
| .cons a s' h pf => .cons a s' h q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
lemma Finset.insert_eq_cons {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) :
insert a s = Finset.cons a s h := by
ext; simp
lemma Finset.range_zero' {n : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n 0) :
Finset.range n = {} := by rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_zero, Finset.range_zero]
lemma Finset.range_succ' {n nn n' : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n nn) (pn' : nn = Nat.succ n') :
Finset.range n = Finset.cons n' (Finset.range n') Finset.not_mem_range_self := by
rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_id, pn', Finset.range_succ, Finset.insert_eq_cons]
lemma Finset.univ_eq_elems {α : Type*} [Fintype α] (elems : Finset α)
(complete : ∀ x : α, x ∈ elems) :
Finset.univ = elems := by
ext x; simpa using complete x
/-- Either show the expression `s : Q(Finset α)` is empty, or remove one element from it.
Fails if we cannot determine which of the alternatives apply to the expression.
-/
partial def Finset.proveEmptyOrCons {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(Finset $α)) :
MetaM (ProveEmptyOrConsResult s) :=
match s.getAppFnArgs with
| (``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection, _) => haveI : $s =Q {} := ⟨⟩; pure (.empty q(rfl))
| (``Finset.cons, #[_, (a : Q($α)), (s' : Q(Finset $α)), (h : Q(¬ $a ∈ $s'))]) =>
haveI : $s =Q .cons $a $s' $h := ⟨⟩
pure (.cons a s' h q(.refl $s))
| (``Finset.mk, #[_, (val : Q(Multiset $α)), (nd : Q(Multiset.Nodup $val))]) => do
match ← Multiset.proveZeroOrCons val with
| .zero pf => pure <| .empty (q($pf ▸ Finset.mk_zero) : Q(Finset.mk $val $nd = ∅))
| .cons a s' pf => do
let h : Q(Multiset.Nodup ($a ::ₘ $s')) := q($pf ▸ $nd)
let nd' : Q(Multiset.Nodup $s') := q((Multiset.nodup_cons.mp $h).2)
let h' : Q($a ∉ $s') := q((Multiset.nodup_cons.mp $h).1)
return (.cons a q(Finset.mk $s' $nd') h'
(q($pf ▸ Finset.mk_cons $h) : Q(Finset.mk $val $nd = Finset.cons $a ⟨$s', $nd'⟩ $h')))
| (``Finset.range, #[(n : Q(ℕ))]) =>
have s : Q(Finset ℕ) := s; .uncheckedCast _ _ <$> show MetaM (ProveEmptyOrConsResult s) from do
let ⟨nn, pn⟩ ← NormNum.deriveNat n _
haveI' : $s =Q .range $n := ⟨⟩
let nnL := nn.natLit!
if nnL = 0 then
haveI : $nn =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
return .empty q(Finset.range_zero' $pn)
else
have n' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (nnL - 1)
haveI' : $nn =Q ($n').succ := ⟨⟩
return .cons n' _ _ q(Finset.range_succ' $pn (.refl $nn))
| (``Finset.univ, #[_, (instFT : Q(Fintype $α))]) => do
haveI' : $s =Q .univ := ⟨⟩
match (← whnfI instFT).getAppFnArgs with
| (``Fintype.mk, #[_, (elems : Q(Finset $α)), (complete : Q(∀ x : $α, x ∈ $elems))]) => do
let res ← Finset.proveEmptyOrCons elems
pure <| res.eq_trans q(Finset.univ_eq_elems $elems $complete)
| e =>
throwError "Finset.proveEmptyOrCons: could not determine elements of Fintype instance {e}"
| (fn, args) =>
throwError "Finset.proveEmptyOrCons: unsupported finset expression {s} ({fn}, {args})"
namespace NormNum
/-- If `a = b` and we can evaluate `b`, then we can evaluate `a`. -/
def Result.eq_trans {α : Q(Type u)} {a b : Q($α)} (eq : Q($a = $b)) : Result b → Result a
| .isBool true proof =>
have a : Q(Prop) := a
have b : Q(Prop) := b
have eq : Q($a = $b) := eq
have proof : Q($b) := proof
Result.isTrue (x := a) q($eq ▸ $proof)
| .isBool false proof =>
have a : Q(Prop) := a
have b : Q(Prop) := b
have eq : Q($a = $b) := eq
have proof : Q(¬ $b) := proof
Result.isFalse (x := a) q($eq ▸ $proof)
| .isNat inst lit proof => Result.isNat inst lit q($eq ▸ $proof)
| .isNegNat inst lit proof => Result.isNegNat inst lit q($eq ▸ $proof)
| .isRat inst q n d proof => Result.isRat inst q n d q($eq ▸ $proof)
protected lemma Finset.sum_empty {β α : Type*} [CommSemiring β] (f : α → β) :
IsNat (Finset.sum ∅ f) 0 :=
⟨by simp⟩
protected lemma Finset.prod_empty {β α : Type*} [CommSemiring β] (f : α → β) :
IsNat (Finset.prod ∅ f) 1 :=
| ⟨by simp⟩
/-- Evaluate a big operator applied to a finset by repeating `proveEmptyOrCons` until
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/BigOperators.lean | 326 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
| rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 173 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Topology on archimedean groups and fields
In this file we prove the following theorems:
- `Rat.denseRange_cast`: the coercion from `ℚ` to a linear ordered archimedean field has dense
range;
- `AddSubgroup.dense_of_not_isolated_zero`, `AddSubgroup.dense_of_no_min`: two sufficient conditions
for a subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive commutative group to be dense;
- `AddSubgroup.dense_or_cyclic`: an additive subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive
commutative group `G` with order topology either is dense in `G` or is a cyclic subgroup.
-/
open Set
/-- Rational numbers are dense in a linear ordered archimedean field. -/
theorem Rat.denseRange_cast {𝕜} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] : DenseRange ((↑) : ℚ → 𝕜) :=
dense_of_exists_between fun _ _ h => Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| exists_rat_btwn h
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G]
[TopologicalSpace G] [OrderTopology G]
[MulArchimedean G]
/-- A subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered multiplicative commutative group with order
topology is dense provided that for all `ε > 1` there exists an element of the subgroup
| that belongs to `(1, ε)`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive commutative group with
order topology is dense provided that for all positive `ε` there exists a positive element of the
subgroup that is less than `ε`."]
theorem dense_of_not_isolated_one (S : Subgroup G) (hS : ∀ ε > 1, ∃ g ∈ S, g ∈ Ioo 1 ε) :
Dense (S : Set G) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial G
· refine fun x => _root_.subset_closure ?_
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
exact one_mem S
refine dense_of_exists_between fun a b hlt => ?_
rcases hS (b / a) (one_lt_div'.2 hlt) with ⟨g, hgS, hg0, hg⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Archimedean.lean | 42 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Scalar
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subsemiring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Defs
/-!
# Integer elements of a localization
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.IsInteger` is a predicate stating that `x : S` is in the image of `R`
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M : Submonoid R} {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
open Function
namespace IsLocalization
section
variable (R)
-- TODO: define a subalgebra of `IsInteger`s
/-- Given `a : S`, `S` a localization of `R`, `IsInteger R a` iff `a` is in the image of
the localization map from `R` to `S`. -/
def IsInteger (a : S) : Prop :=
a ∈ (algebraMap R S).rangeS
end
theorem isInteger_zero : IsInteger R (0 : S) :=
Subsemiring.zero_mem _
theorem isInteger_one : IsInteger R (1 : S) :=
Subsemiring.one_mem _
theorem isInteger_add {a b : S} (ha : IsInteger R a) (hb : IsInteger R b) : IsInteger R (a + b) :=
Subsemiring.add_mem _ ha hb
theorem isInteger_mul {a b : S} (ha : IsInteger R a) (hb : IsInteger R b) : IsInteger R (a * b) :=
Subsemiring.mul_mem _ ha hb
theorem isInteger_smul {a : R} {b : S} (hb : IsInteger R b) : IsInteger R (a • b) := by
rcases hb with ⟨b', hb⟩
use a * b'
rw [← hb, (algebraMap R S).map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
| variable (M)
variable [IsLocalization M S]
/-- Each element `a : S` has an `M`-multiple which is an integer.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integer.lean | 63 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-! # Power function on `ℂ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are complex numbers.
-/
open Real Topology Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
namespace Complex
/-- The complex power function `x ^ y`, given by `x ^ y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the
principal determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and
`0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : Pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨cpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
if_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff {x y : ℂ} :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or, ne_eq, not_not]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff_of_exponent_ne_zero {x y : ℂ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [cpow_def, *]
theorem zero_cpow_eq_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [cpow_def, eq_self_iff_true, if_true] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true] at hyp
right
exact ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [if_neg h] at hyp
left
exact ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_cpow h
· exact cpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_cpow_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : a = (0 : ℂ) ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_cpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp]
theorem one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [one_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def, ite_mul, boole_mul, mul_ite, mul_boole]
simp_all [exp_add, mul_add]
theorem cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc]
theorem cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [cpow_def, neg_eq_zero, mul_neg]
split_ifs <;> simp [exp_neg]
theorem cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ := by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
/-- See also `Complex.cpow_int_mul'`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy <;> simp [*, zero_zpow]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_left_comm, exp_int_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_int (x y : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by rw [mul_comm, cpow_int_mul]
lemma cpow_nat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n :=
mod_cast cpow_int_mul x n y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (ofNat(n) * y) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_nat_mul x n y
lemma cpow_mul_nat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [mul_comm, cpow_nat_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_ofNat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (y * ofNat(n)) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_mul_nat x y n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_natCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_nat_mul x n 1
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℂ) = x ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_natCast x n
theorem cpow_two (x : ℂ) : x ^ (2 : ℂ) = x ^ (2 : ℕ) := cpow_ofNat x 2
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cpow_intCast (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℂ) = x ^ n := by simpa using cpow_int_mul x n 1
@[simp]
theorem cpow_nat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀, cpow_one]
assumption_mod_cast
@[simp]
lemma cpow_ofNat_inv_pow (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(x ^ ((ofNat(n) : ℂ)⁻¹)) ^ (ofNat(n) : ℕ) = x :=
cpow_nat_inv_pow _ (NeZero.ne n)
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_int_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℤ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
rw [mul_comm] at hlt hle
rw [cpow_mul, cpow_intCast] <;> simpa [log_im]
/-- A version of `Complex.cpow_nat_mul` with RHS that matches `Complex.cpow_mul`.
The assumptions on the arguments are needed
because the equality fails, e.g., for `x = -I`, `n = 2`, `y = 1/2`. -/
lemma cpow_nat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hlt : -π < n * x.arg) (hle : n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ n) ^ y :=
cpow_int_mul' hlt hle y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -π < OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg)
(hle : OfNat.ofNat n * x.arg ≤ π) (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n * y) = (x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ y :=
cpow_nat_mul' hlt hle y
lemma pow_cpow_nat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h₀ : n ≠ 0) (hlt : -(π / n) < x.arg) (hle : x.arg ≤ π / n) :
(x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← cpow_nat_mul', mul_inv_cancel₀ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 h₀), cpow_one]
· rwa [← div_lt_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt), neg_div]
· rwa [← le_div_iff₀' (Nat.cast_pos.2 h₀.bot_lt)]
lemma pow_cpow_ofNat_inv {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] (hlt : -(π / OfNat.ofNat n) < x.arg)
(hle : x.arg ≤ π / OfNat.ofNat n) :
(x ^ ofNat(n)) ^ ((OfNat.ofNat n : ℂ)⁻¹) = x :=
pow_cpow_nat_inv (NeZero.ne n) hlt hle
/-- See also `Complex.pow_cpow_ofNat_inv` for a version that also works for `x * I`, `0 ≤ x`. -/
lemma sq_cpow_two_inv {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 < x.re) : (x ^ (2 : ℕ)) ^ (2⁻¹ : ℂ) = x :=
pow_cpow_ofNat_inv (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff.2 <| .inl hx)
(arg_le_pi_div_two_iff.2 <| .inl hx.le)
theorem mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (r : ℂ) :
((a : ℂ) * (b : ℂ)) ^ r = (a : ℂ) ^ r * (b : ℂ) ^ r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· simp only [cpow_zero, mul_one]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le ha with (rfl | ha')
· rw [ofReal_zero, zero_mul, zero_cpow hr, zero_mul]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hb with (rfl | hb')
· rw [ofReal_zero, mul_zero, zero_cpow hr, mul_zero]
have ha'' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha'.ne'
have hb'' : (b : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hb'.ne'
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero ha'' hb''), log_ofReal_mul ha' hb'', ofReal_log ha,
add_mul, exp_add, ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero ha'', ← cpow_def_of_ne_zero hb'']
lemma natCast_mul_natCast_cpow (m n : ℕ) (s : ℂ) : (m * n : ℂ) ^ s = m ^ s * n ^ s :=
ofReal_natCast m ▸ ofReal_natCast n ▸ mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg m.cast_nonneg n.cast_nonneg s
lemma natCast_cpow_natCast_mul (n m : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n : ℂ) ^ (m * z) = ((n : ℂ) ^ m) ^ z := by
refine cpow_nat_mul' (x := n) (n := m) ?_ ?_ z
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff, pi_pos]
· simp only [natCast_arg, mul_zero, pi_pos.le]
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
x⁻¹ ^ n = if x.arg = π then conj (x ^ conj n)⁻¹ else (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [Complex.cpow_def, log_inv_eq_ite, inv_eq_zero, map_eq_zero, ite_mul, neg_mul,
RCLike.conj_inv, apply_ite conj, apply_ite exp, apply_ite Inv.inv, map_zero, map_one, exp_neg,
inv_one, inv_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj]
split_ifs with hx hn ha ha <;> rfl
theorem inv_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : x⁻¹ ^ n = (x ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
/-- `Complex.inv_cpow_eq_ite` with the `ite` on the other side. -/
theorem inv_cpow_eq_ite' (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
(x ^ n)⁻¹ = if x.arg = π then conj (x⁻¹ ^ conj n) else x⁻¹ ^ n := by
rw [inv_cpow_eq_ite, apply_ite conj, conj_conj, conj_conj]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· rw [inv_cpow _ _ h]
theorem conj_cpow_eq_ite (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) :
conj x ^ n = if x.arg = π then x ^ n else conj (x ^ conj n) := by
simp_rw [cpow_def, map_eq_zero, apply_ite conj, map_one, map_zero, ← exp_conj, map_mul, conj_conj,
log_conj_eq_ite]
split_ifs with hcx hn hx <;> rfl
theorem conj_cpow (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : conj x ^ n = conj (x ^ conj n) := by
rw [conj_cpow_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
theorem cpow_conj (x : ℂ) (n : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : x ^ conj n = conj (conj x ^ n) := by
rw [conj_cpow _ _ hx, conj_conj]
lemma natCast_add_one_cpow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (n + 1 : ℂ) ^ z ≠ 0 :=
mt (cpow_eq_zero_iff ..).mp fun H ↦ by norm_cast at H; exact H.1
end Complex
-- section Tactics
-- /-!
-- ## Tactic extensions for complex powers
-- -/
-- namespace NormNum
-- theorem cpow_pos (a b : ℂ) (b' : ℕ) (c : ℂ) (hb : b = b') (h : a ^ b' = c) : a ^ b = c := by
-- rw [← h, hb, Complex.cpow_natCast]
-- theorem cpow_neg (a b : ℂ) (b' : ℕ) (c c' : ℂ) (hb : b = b') (h : a ^ b' = c) (hc : c⁻¹ = c') :
-- a ^ (-b) = c' := by rw [← hc, ← h, hb, Complex.cpow_neg, Complex.cpow_natCast]
-- open Tactic
-- /-- Generalized version of `prove_cpow`, `prove_nnrpow`, `prove_ennrpow`. -/
-- unsafe def prove_rpow' (pos neg zero : Name) (α β one a b : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) := do
-- let na ← a.to_rat
-- let icα ← mk_instance_cache α
-- let icβ ← mk_instance_cache β
-- match match_sign b with
-- | Sum.inl b => do
| -- let nc ← mk_instance_cache q(ℕ)
-- let (icβ, nc, b', hb) ← prove_nat_uncast icβ nc b
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Complex.lean | 267 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Basic
/-!
# Von Neumann ordinals
This file works towards the development of von Neumann ordinals, i.e. transitive sets, well-ordered
under `∈`.
## Definitions
- `ZFSet.IsTransitive` means that every element of a set is a subset.
- `ZFSet.IsOrdinal` means that the set is transitive and well-ordered under `∈`. We show multiple
equivalences to this definition.
## TODO
- Define the von Neumann hierarchy.
- Build correspondences between these set notions and those of the standard `Ordinal` type.
-/
universe u
variable {x y z w : ZFSet.{u}}
namespace ZFSet
/-! ### Transitive sets -/
/-- A transitive set is one where every element is a subset.
This is equivalent to being an infinite-open interval in the transitive closure of membership. -/
def IsTransitive (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
∀ y ∈ x, y ⊆ x
@[simp]
theorem isTransitive_empty : IsTransitive ∅ := fun y hy => (not_mem_empty y hy).elim
theorem IsTransitive.subset_of_mem (h : x.IsTransitive) : y ∈ x → y ⊆ x := h y
theorem isTransitive_iff_mem_trans : z.IsTransitive ↔ ∀ {x y : ZFSet}, x ∈ y → y ∈ z → x ∈ z :=
⟨fun h _ _ hx hy => h.subset_of_mem hy hx, fun H _ hx _ hy => H hy hx⟩
alias ⟨IsTransitive.mem_trans, _⟩ := isTransitive_iff_mem_trans
protected theorem IsTransitive.inter (hx : x.IsTransitive) (hy : y.IsTransitive) :
(x ∩ y).IsTransitive := fun z hz w hw => by
rw [mem_inter] at hz ⊢
exact ⟨hx.mem_trans hw hz.1, hy.mem_trans hw hz.2⟩
/-- The union of a transitive set is transitive. -/
protected theorem IsTransitive.sUnion (h : x.IsTransitive) :
(⋃₀ x : ZFSet).IsTransitive := fun y hy z hz => by
rcases mem_sUnion.1 hy with ⟨w, hw, hw'⟩
exact mem_sUnion_of_mem hz (h.mem_trans hw' hw)
/-- The union of transitive sets is transitive. -/
theorem IsTransitive.sUnion' (H : ∀ y ∈ x, IsTransitive y) :
(⋃₀ x : ZFSet).IsTransitive := fun y hy z hz => by
rcases mem_sUnion.1 hy with ⟨w, hw, hw'⟩
exact mem_sUnion_of_mem ((H w hw).mem_trans hz hw') hw
protected theorem IsTransitive.union (hx : x.IsTransitive) (hy : y.IsTransitive) :
(x ∪ y).IsTransitive := by
| rw [← sUnion_pair]
apply IsTransitive.sUnion'
intro
rw [mem_pair]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Ordinal.lean | 71 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.HasseDeriv
/-!
# Taylor expansions of polynomials
## Main declarations
* `Polynomial.taylor`: the Taylor expansion of the polynomial `f` at `r`
* `Polynomial.taylor_coeff`: the `k`th coefficient of `taylor r f` is
`(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`
* `Polynomial.eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero`:
the identity principle: a polynomial is 0 iff all its Hasse derivatives are zero
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X])
/-- The Taylor expansion of a polynomial `f` at `r`. -/
def taylor (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun f := f.comp (X + C r)
map_add' _ _ := add_comp
map_smul' c f := by simp only [smul_eq_C_mul, C_mul_comp, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem taylor_apply : taylor r f = f.comp (X + C r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem taylor_X : taylor r X = X + C r := by simp only [taylor_apply, X_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_C (x : R) : taylor r (C x) = C x := by simp only [taylor_apply, C_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_zero' : taylor (0 : R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp only [taylor_apply, add_zero, comp_X, map_zero, LinearMap.id_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp]
theorem taylor_zero (f : R[X]) : taylor 0 f = f := by rw [taylor_zero', LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_one : taylor r (1 : R[X]) = C 1 := by rw [← C_1, taylor_C]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_monomial (i : ℕ) (k : R) : taylor r (monomial i k) = C k * (X + C r) ^ i := by
simp [taylor_apply]
/-- The `k`th coefficient of `Polynomial.taylor r f` is `(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`. -/
theorem taylor_coeff (n : ℕ) : (taylor r f).coeff n = (hasseDeriv n f).eval r :=
show (lcoeff R n).comp (taylor r) f = (leval r).comp (hasseDeriv n) f by
congr 1; clear! f; ext i
simp only [leval_apply, mul_one, one_mul, eval_monomial, LinearMap.comp_apply, coeff_C_mul,
hasseDeriv_monomial, taylor_apply, monomial_comp, C_1, (commute_X (C r)).add_pow i,
map_sum]
simp only [lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_natCast, mul_assoc, ← C_pow, ← C_mul, coeff_mul_C,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, coeff_X_pow, boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_range]
split_ifs with h; · rfl
push_neg at h; rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_zero : (taylor r f).coeff 0 = f.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_zero, LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_one : (taylor r f).coeff 1 = f.derivative.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_one]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_taylor (p : R[X]) (r : R) : natDegree (taylor r p) = natDegree p := by
refine map_natDegree_eq_natDegree _ ?_
nontriviality R
intro n c c0
simp [taylor_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero, natDegree_pow_X_add_C, c0]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_mul {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (p q : R[X]) :
taylor r (p * q) = taylor r p * taylor r q := by simp only [taylor_apply, mul_comp]
/-- `Polynomial.taylor` as an `AlgHom` for commutative semirings -/
@[simps!]
def taylorAlgHom {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one r) (taylor_mul r)
theorem taylor_taylor {R} [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (r s : R) :
taylor r (taylor s f) = taylor (r + s) f := by
simp only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, map_add, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_add, add_assoc]
theorem taylor_eval {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval s = f.eval (s + r) := by
simp only [taylor_apply, eval_comp, eval_C, eval_X, eval_add]
theorem taylor_eval_sub {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval (s - r) = f.eval s := by rw [taylor_eval, sub_add_cancel]
theorem taylor_injective {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) : Function.Injective (taylor r) := by
intro f g h
apply_fun taylor (-r) at h
simpa only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_neg, neg_add_cancel_right,
comp_X] using h
theorem eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R)
(h : ∀ k, (hasseDeriv k f).eval r = 0) : f = 0 := by
apply taylor_injective r
rw [LinearMap.map_zero]
ext k
simp only [taylor_coeff, h, coeff_zero]
/-- Taylor's formula. -/
theorem sum_taylor_eq {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R) :
((taylor r f).sum fun i a => C a * (X - C r) ^ i) = f := by
rw [← comp_eq_sum_left, sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, ← taylor_apply, taylor_taylor, neg_add_cancel,
taylor_zero]
theorem eval_add_of_sq_eq_zero {A} [CommSemiring A] (p : Polynomial A) (x y : A) (hy : y ^ 2 = 0) :
p.eval (x + y) = p.eval x + p.derivative.eval x * y := by
rw [add_comm, ← Polynomial.taylor_eval,
Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_range' ((Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _)),
Finset.sum_range_succ', Finset.sum_range_succ']
simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, ← pow_two, hy, add_comm (eval x p)]
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Taylor.lean | 137 | 142 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
| (hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,188 | 1,190 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.AddAut
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Divisible
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.PathConnected
import Mathlib.Topology.IsLocalHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ZMultiples
/-!
# The additive circle
We define the additive circle `AddCircle p` as the quotient `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`.
See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. For the normed group structure on `AddCircle`, see
`AddCircle.NormedAddCommGroup` in a later file.
## Main definitions and results:
* `AddCircle`: the additive circle `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`
* `UnitAddCircle`: the special case `ℝ ⧸ ℤ`
* `AddCircle.equivAddCircle`: the rescaling equivalence `AddCircle p ≃+ AddCircle q`
* `AddCircle.equivIco`: the natural equivalence `AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p)`
* `AddCircle.addOrderOf_div_of_gcd_eq_one`: rational points have finite order
* `AddCircle.exists_gcd_eq_one_of_isOfFinAddOrder`: finite-order points are rational
* `AddCircle.homeoIccQuot`: the natural topological equivalence between `AddCircle p` and
`Icc a (a + p)` with its endpoints identified.
* `AddCircle.liftIco_continuous`: if `f : ℝ → B` is continuous, and `f a = f (a + p)` for
some `a`, then there is a continuous function `AddCircle p → B` which agrees with `f` on
`Icc a (a + p)`.
## Implementation notes:
Although the most important case is `𝕜 = ℝ` we wish to support other types of scalars, such as
the rational circle `AddCircle (1 : ℚ)`, and so we set things up more generally.
## TODO
* Link with periodicity
* Lie group structure
* Exponential equivalence to `Circle`
-/
noncomputable section
open AddCommGroup Set Function AddSubgroup TopologicalSpace
open Topology
variable {𝕜 B : Type*}
section Continuity
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
{p : 𝕜} (hp : 0 < p) (a x : 𝕜)
theorem continuous_right_toIcoMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIcoMod hp a) (Ici x) x := by
intro s h
rw [Filter.mem_map, mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter]
haveI : Nontrivial 𝕜 := ⟨⟨0, p, hp.ne⟩⟩
simp_rw [mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨l, u, hxI, hIs⟩ := h
let d := toIcoDiv hp a x • p
have hd := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a x
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨_, ⟨l + d, min (a + p) u + d, ?_, fun x => id⟩, fun y => ?_⟩ <;>
simp_rw [← sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, mem_Ioo, lt_min_iff]
· exact ⟨hxI.1, hd.2, hxI.2⟩
· rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
apply hIs
rw [← toIcoMod_sub_zsmul, (toIcoMod_eq_self _).2]
exacts [⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩, ⟨hd.1.trans (sub_le_sub_right h' _), h.2.1⟩]
theorem continuous_left_toIocMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIocMod hp a) (Iic x) x := by
rw [(funext fun y => Eq.trans (by rw [neg_neg]) <| toIocMod_neg _ _ _ :
toIocMod hp a = (fun x => p - x) ∘ toIcoMod hp (-a) ∘ Neg.neg)]
exact
(continuous_sub_left _).continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt <|
(continuous_right_toIcoMod _ _ _).comp continuous_neg.continuousWithinAt fun y => neg_le_neg
variable {x}
theorem toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) :
toIcoMod hp a =ᶠ[𝓝 x] toIocMod hp a :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds
(by
rw [Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_Ioo) <|
(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 <| not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples.2 hx
theorem continuousAt_toIcoMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIcoMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨(continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq (h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
h.eq_of_nhds,
continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x⟩
theorem continuousAt_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIocMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x,
(continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h.symm.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds) h.symm.eq_of_nhds⟩
end Continuity
/-- The "additive circle": `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)`. See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. -/
abbrev AddCircle [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜) :=
𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p
namespace AddCircle
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜)
theorem coe_nsmul {n : ℕ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul {n : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_add (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x + y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) + (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_sub (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x - y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) - (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_neg {x : 𝕜} : (↑(-x) : AddCircle p) = -(x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : 𝕜) = (0 : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : 𝕜} : (x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • p = x := by
simp [AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
theorem coe_period : (p : AddCircle p) = 0 :=
(QuotientAddGroup.eq_zero_iff p).2 <| mem_zmultiples p
theorem coe_add_period (x : 𝕜) : ((x + p : 𝕜) : AddCircle p) = x := by
rw [coe_add, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', sub_self, coe_period]
@[continuity, nolint unusedArguments]
protected theorem continuous_mk' [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] :
Continuous (QuotientAddGroup.mk' (zmultiples p) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
variable [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜]
theorem coe_eq_zero_of_pos_iff (hp : 0 < p) {x : 𝕜} (hx : 0 < x) :
(x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, n • p = x := by
rw [coe_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
· replace hx : 0 < n := by
contrapose! hx
simpa only [← neg_nonneg, ← zsmul_neg, zsmul_neg'] using zsmul_nonneg hp.le (neg_nonneg.2 hx)
exact ⟨n.toNat, by rw [← natCast_zsmul, Int.toNat_of_nonneg hx.le]⟩
· exact ⟨(n : ℤ), by simp⟩
variable [hp : Fact (0 < p)] (a : 𝕜) [Archimedean 𝕜]
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `[a, a + p)`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIco : AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out a
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `(a, a + p]`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIoc : AddCircle p ≃ Ioc a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp.out a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`[a, a + p)`. -/
def liftIco (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIco p a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`(a, a + p]`. -/
def liftIoc (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIoc p a
variable {p a}
theorem coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico {x y : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) (hy : y ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
(x : AddCircle p) = y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by tauto⟩
suffices (⟨x, hx⟩ : Ico a (a + p)) = ⟨y, hy⟩ by exact Subtype.mk.inj this
apply_fun equivIco p a at h
rw [← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨x, hx⟩, ← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨y, hy⟩]
exact h
theorem liftIco_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
liftIco p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIco p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
rfl
rw [liftIco, comp_apply, this]
rfl
theorem liftIoc_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ioc a (a + p)) :
liftIoc p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIoc p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
rfl
rw [liftIoc, comp_apply, this]
rfl
lemma eq_coe_Ico (a : AddCircle p) : ∃ b, b ∈ Ico 0 p ∧ ↑b = a := by
let b := QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out 0 a
exact ⟨b.1, by simpa only [zero_add] using b.2,
(QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out 0).symm_apply_apply a⟩
lemma coe_eq_zero_iff_of_mem_Ico (ha : a ∈ Ico 0 p) :
(a : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
have h0 : 0 ∈ Ico 0 (0 + p) := by simpa [zero_add, left_mem_Ico] using hp.out
have ha' : a ∈ Ico 0 (0 + p) := by rwa [zero_add]
rw [← AddCircle.coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico ha' h0, QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero]
variable (p a)
section Continuity
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_equivIco_symm : Continuous (equivIco p a).symm :=
continuous_quotient_mk'.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_equivIoc_symm : Continuous (equivIoc p a).symm :=
continuous_quotient_mk'.comp continuous_subtype_val
variable [OrderTopology 𝕜] {x : AddCircle p}
theorem continuousAt_equivIco (hx : x ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (equivIco p a) x := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [ContinuousAt, Filter.Tendsto, QuotientAddGroup.nhds_eq, Filter.map_map]
exact (continuousAt_toIcoMod hp.out a hx).codRestrict _
theorem continuousAt_equivIoc (hx : x ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (equivIoc p a) x := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [ContinuousAt, Filter.Tendsto, QuotientAddGroup.nhds_eq, Filter.map_map]
exact (continuousAt_toIocMod hp.out a hx).codRestrict _
/-- The quotient map `𝕜 → AddCircle p` as a partial homeomorphism. -/
@[simps] def partialHomeomorphCoe [DiscreteTopology (zmultiples p)] :
PartialHomeomorph 𝕜 (AddCircle p) where
toFun := (↑)
invFun := fun x ↦ equivIco p a x
source := Ioo a (a + p)
target := {↑a}ᶜ
map_source' := by
intro x hx hx'
exact hx.1.ne' ((coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx)
(left_mem_Ico.mpr (lt_add_of_pos_right a hp.out))).mp hx')
map_target' := by
intro x hx
exact (eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico (equivIco p a x).2).resolve_left
(hx ∘ ((equivIco p a).symm_apply_apply x).symm.trans ∘ congrArg _)
left_inv' :=
fun x hx ↦ congrArg _ ((equivIco p a).apply_symm_apply ⟨x, Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx⟩)
right_inv' := fun x _ ↦ (equivIco p a).symm_apply_apply x
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_compl_singleton
continuousOn_toFun := (AddCircle.continuous_mk' p).continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := by
exact continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
(fun _ ↦ continuousAt_subtype_val.comp ∘ continuousAt_equivIco p a)
lemma isLocalHomeomorph_coe [DiscreteTopology (zmultiples p)] [DenselyOrdered 𝕜] :
IsLocalHomeomorph ((↑) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) := by
intro a
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := exists_between (sub_lt_self a hp.out)
exact ⟨partialHomeomorphCoe p b, ⟨hb2, lt_add_of_sub_right_lt hb1⟩, rfl⟩
end Continuity
/-- The image of the closed-open interval `[a, a + p)` under the quotient map `𝕜 → AddCircle p` is
the entire space. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_Ico_eq : ((↑) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) '' Ico a (a + p) = univ := by
rw [image_eq_range]
exact (equivIco p a).symm.range_eq_univ
/-- The image of the closed-open interval `[a, a + p)` under the quotient map `𝕜 → AddCircle p` is
the entire space. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_Ioc_eq : ((↑) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) '' Ioc a (a + p) = univ := by
rw [image_eq_range]
exact (equivIoc p a).symm.range_eq_univ
/-- The image of the closed interval `[0, p]` under the quotient map `𝕜 → AddCircle p` is the
entire space. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_Icc_eq : ((↑) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) '' Icc a (a + p) = univ :=
eq_top_mono (image_subset _ Ico_subset_Icc_self) <| coe_image_Ico_eq _ _
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] (p q : 𝕜)
/-- The rescaling equivalence between additive circles with different periods. -/
def equivAddCircle (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) : AddCircle p ≃+ AddCircle q :=
QuotientAddGroup.congr _ _ (AddAut.mulRight <| (Units.mk0 p hp)⁻¹ * Units.mk0 q hq) <| by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_zmultiples, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe, AddAut.mulRight_apply, Units.val_mul,
Units.val_mk0, Units.val_inv_eq_inv_val, Units.val_mk0, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hp]
@[simp]
theorem equivAddCircle_apply_mk (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) (x : 𝕜) :
equivAddCircle p q hp hq (x : 𝕜) = (x * (p⁻¹ * q) : 𝕜) :=
rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem equivAddCircle_symm_apply_mk (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) (x : 𝕜) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/AddCircle.lean | 323 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
/-!
# Lemmas about images of intervals under order isomorphisms.
-/
open Set
namespace OrderIso
section Preorder
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem image_Iic (e : α ≃o β) (a : α) : e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) := by
rw [e.image_eq_preimage, e.symm.preimage_Iic, e.symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem image_Ici (e : α ≃o β) (a : α) : e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Iic a
@[simp]
theorem image_Iio (e : α ≃o β) (a : α) : e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) := by
rw [e.image_eq_preimage, e.symm.preimage_Iio, e.symm_symm]
@[simp]
theorem image_Ioi (e : α ≃o β) (a : α) : e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Iio a
@[simp]
theorem image_Ioo (e : α ≃o β) (a b : α) : e '' Ioo a b = Ioo (e a) (e b) := by
rw [e.image_eq_preimage, e.symm.preimage_Ioo, e.symm_symm]
@[simp]
| theorem image_Ioc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : α) : e '' Ioc a b = Ioc (e a) (e b) := by
rw [e.image_eq_preimage, e.symm.preimage_Ioc, e.symm_symm]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/OrderIso.lean | 78 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
/-!
# Division of `AddMonoidAlgebra` by monomials
This file is most important for when `G = ℕ` (polynomials) or `G = σ →₀ ℕ` (multivariate
polynomials).
In order to apply in maximal generality (such as for `LaurentPolynomial`s), this uses
`∃ d, g' = g + d` in many places instead of `g ≤ g'`.
## Main definitions
* `AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf x g`: divides `x` by the monomial `AddMonoidAlgebra.of k G g`
* `AddMonoidAlgebra.modOf x g`: the remainder upon dividing `x` by the monomial
`AddMonoidAlgebra.of k G g`.
## Main results
* `AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf_add_modOf`, `AddMonoidAlgebra.modOf_add_divOf`: `divOf` and
`modOf` are well-behaved as quotient and remainder operators.
## Implementation notes
`∃ d, g' = g + d` is used as opposed to some other permutation up to commutativity in order to match
the definition of `semigroupDvd`. The results in this file could be duplicated for
`MonoidAlgebra` by using `g ∣ g'`, but this can't be done automatically, and in any case is not
likely to be very useful.
-/
variable {k G : Type*} [Semiring k]
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
section
variable [AddCommMonoid G]
/-- Divide by `of' k G g`, discarding terms not divisible by this. -/
noncomputable def divOf [IsCancelAdd G] (x : k[G]) (g : G) : k[G] :=
-- note: comapping by `+ g` has the effect of subtracting `g` from every element in
-- the support, and discarding the elements of the support from which `g` can't be subtracted.
-- If `G` is an additive group, such as `ℤ` when used for `LaurentPolynomial`,
-- then no discarding occurs.
@Finsupp.comapDomain.addMonoidHom _ _ _ _ (g + ·) (add_right_injective g) x
local infixl:70 " /ᵒᶠ " => divOf
section divOf
variable [IsCancelAdd G]
@[simp]
theorem divOf_apply (g : G) (x : k[G]) (g' : G) : (x /ᵒᶠ g) g' = x (g + g') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_divOf (g : G) (x : k[G]) :
(x /ᵒᶠ g).support =
x.support.preimage (g + ·) (Function.Injective.injOn (add_right_injective g)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_divOf (g : G) : (0 : k[G]) /ᵒᶠ g = 0 :=
map_zero (Finsupp.comapDomain.addMonoidHom _)
@[simp]
theorem divOf_zero (x : k[G]) : x /ᵒᶠ 0 = x := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf_apply, zero_add]
|
theorem add_divOf (x y : k[G]) (g : G) : (x + y) /ᵒᶠ g = x /ᵒᶠ g + y /ᵒᶠ g :=
map_add (Finsupp.comapDomain.addMonoidHom _) _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Division.lean | 77 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Span
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules, we construct the lattice structure on Lie submodules and we
use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance (priority := high) coeSort : CoeSort (LieSubmodule R L M) (Type w) where
coe N := { x : M // x ∈ N }
instance (priority := mid) coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
instance : CanLift (Submodule R M) (LieSubmodule R L M) (·)
(fun N ↦ ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ N → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N) where
prf N hN := ⟨⟨N, hN⟩, rfl⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coeSubmodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simp [hs]
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) :
(↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
-- Copying instances from `Submodule` for correct discrimination keys
instance [IsNoetherian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsNoetherian R N.toSubmodule
instance [IsArtinian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsArtinian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsArtinian R N.toSubmodule
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| NoZeroSMulDivisors R N.toSubmodule
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (toSubmodule_inj _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
end LieSubalgebra
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
section LatticeStructure
open Set
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubmodule R L M → Set M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule : (N : Submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule := toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instUniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M)
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias bot_coeSubmodule := bot_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_bot : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_bot_iff := toSubmodule_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_bot_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
instance : Top (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R M) with lie_mem := fun {x m} _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias top_coeSubmodule := top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_top_iff := toSubmodule_eq_top
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_top_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
mem_univ x
instance : Min (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N N' ↦
{ (N ⊓ N' : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun h ↦ mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toSubmodule := sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S}
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, forall_exists_index, and_imp] at h ⊢
intro N hN; apply N.lie_mem (h N hN) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : Set M) = ↑N ∩ ↑N' :=
rfl
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : Submodule R M) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias inf_coe_toSubmodule := inf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule := sInf_toSubmodule
theorem sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sInf_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule' := sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨅ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_toSubmodule]; ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iInf_coe_toSubmodule := iInf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, sInf_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext m
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp,
and_imp, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
instance : Max (LieSubmodule R L M) where
max N N' :=
{ toSubmodule := (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
lie_mem := by
rintro x m (hm : m ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M))
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hm ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hm
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ }
instance : SupSet (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sSup S :=
{ toSubmodule := sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
lie_mem := by
intro x m (hm : m ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S})
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsm⟩ := Submodule.mem_sSup_iff_exists_finset.mp hm
clear hm
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing m with
| empty =>
replace hsm : m = 0 := by simpa using hsm
simp [hsm]
| insert q t hqt ih =>
rw [Finset.iSup_insert] at hsm
obtain ⟨m', hm', u, hu, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hsm
rw [lie_add]
refine add_mem ?_ (ih (Subset.trans (by simp) hs) hu)
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ : ∃ p ∈ S, ↑p = q := hs (Finset.mem_insert_self q t)
suffices p ≤ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S} by exact this (p.lie_mem hm')
exact le_sSup ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem sup_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sup_coe_toSubmodule := sup_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sSup_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = sSup {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule := sSup_toSubmodule
theorem sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sSup_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule' := sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨆ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iSup, sSup_toSubmodule]; ext; simp [Submodule.mem_sSup, Submodule.mem_iSup]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iSup_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_toSubmodule
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
{ toSubmodule_injective.completeLattice toSubmodule sup_toSubmodule inf_toSubmodule
sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf rfl rfl with
toPartialOrder := SetLike.instPartialOrder }
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι} {b : M} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ N i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, N i :=
(le_iSup N i) h
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma iSup_induction {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : M → Prop} {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (mem : ∀ i, ∀ y ∈ N i, motive y) (zero : motive 0)
(add : ∀ y z, motive y → motive z → motive (y + z)) : motive x := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule] at hx
exact Submodule.iSup_induction (motive := motive) (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) hx mem zero add
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iSup_induction' {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : (x : M) → (x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (i) (x) (hx : x ∈ N i), motive x (mem_iSup_of_mem i hx)) (zero : motive 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) : motive x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hc : motive x hx) => hc
refine iSup_induction N (motive := fun x : M ↦ ∃ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i), motive x hx) hx
(fun i x hx => ?_) ?_ fun x y => ?_
· exact ⟨_, mem _ _ hx⟩
· exact ⟨_, zero⟩
· rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩
exact ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩
variable {N N'}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_toSubmodule :
Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Disjoint N N' := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, inf_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule,
← disjoint_iff]
@[deprecated disjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem disjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Disjoint N N' ↔ Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := disjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := disjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Codisjoint N N' := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, sup_toSubmodule,
top_toSubmodule, ← codisjoint_iff]
@[deprecated codisjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint N N' ↔ Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) :=
codisjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma isCompl_toSubmodule :
IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ IsCompl N N' := by
simp [isCompl_iff]
@[deprecated isCompl_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem isCompl_iff_toSubmodule :
IsCompl N N' ↔ IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := isCompl_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias isCompl_iff_coe_toSubmodule := isCompl_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSupIndep_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) ↔ iSupIndep N := by
simp [iSupIndep_def, ← disjoint_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated iSupIndep_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep N ↔ iSupIndep fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M) := iSupIndep_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSupIndep_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias independent_iff_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias independent_iff_coe_toSubmodule := independent_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, N i = ⊤ := by
rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, ← top_toSubmodule (L := L), toSubmodule_inj]
@[deprecated iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, N i = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ := iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSup_eq_top_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule
instance : Add (LieSubmodule R L M) where add := max
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) where zero := ⊥
instance : AddCommMonoid (LieSubmodule R L M) where
add_assoc := sup_assoc
zero_add := bot_sup_eq
add_zero := sup_bot_eq
add_comm := sup_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec
variable (N N')
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup : N + N' = N ⊔ N' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊓ N' ↔ x ∈ N ∧ x ∈ N' := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule,
Submodule.mem_inf]
theorem mem_sup (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊔ N' ↔ ∃ y ∈ N, ∃ z ∈ N', y + z = x := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, Submodule.mem_sup]; exact Iff.rfl
nonrec theorem eq_bot_iff : N = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m : M, m ∈ N → m = 0 := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact Iff.rfl
instance subsingleton_of_bot : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)) := by
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
ext ⟨_, hx⟩
simp only [mem_bot, mk_eq_zero, mem_top, iff_true]
exact hx
instance : IsModularLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _ _ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule]
exact IsModularLattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _
variable (R L M)
/-- The natural functor that forgets the action of `L` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps] def toSubmodule_orderEmbedding : LieSubmodule R L M ↪o Submodule R M :=
{ toFun := (↑)
inj' := toSubmodule_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl }
instance wellFoundedGT_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R M] : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).dual.ltEmbedding
theorem wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian [IsArtinian R M] : WellFoundedLT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).ltEmbedding
instance [IsArtinian R M] : IsAtomic (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt <| (wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M).wf
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
have h : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton (Submodule R M) := by
rw [← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← toSubmodule_inj,
top_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule]
h.trans <| Submodule.subsingleton_iff R
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Nontrivial M :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans <| subsingleton_iff R L M).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
instance [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
(nontrivial_iff R L M).mpr ‹_›
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} : Nontrivial N ↔ N ≠ ⊥ := by
constructor <;> contrapose!
· rintro rfl
⟨⟨m₁, h₁ : m₁ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, ⟨m₂, h₂ : m₂ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, h₁₂⟩
simp [(LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₁, (LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₂] at h₁₂
· rw [not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro ⟨h⟩ m hm
simpa using h ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨_, N.zero_mem⟩
variable {R L M}
section InclusionMaps
/-- The inclusion of a Lie submodule into its ambient space is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ Submodule.subtype (N : Submodule R M) with map_lie' := fun {_ _} ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem incl_coe : (N.incl : N →ₗ[R] M) = (N : Submodule R M).subtype :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem incl_apply (m : N) : N.incl m = m :=
rfl
theorem incl_eq_val : (N.incl : N → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem injective_incl : Function.Injective N.incl := Subtype.coe_injective
variable {N N'}
variable (h : N ≤ N')
/-- Given two nested Lie submodules `N ⊆ N'`,
the inclusion `N ↪ N'` is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def inclusion : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N' where
__ := Submodule.inclusion (show N.toSubmodule ≤ N'.toSubmodule from h)
map_lie' := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion (m : N) : (inclusion h m : M) = m :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_apply (m : N) : inclusion h m = ⟨m.1, h m.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_injective : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [inclusion_apply, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
end InclusionMaps
section LieSpan
variable (R L) (s : Set M)
/-- The `lieSpan` of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest Lie submodule of `M` that contains `s`. -/
def lieSpan : LieSubmodule R L M :=
sInf { N | s ⊆ N }
variable {R L s}
theorem mem_lieSpan {x : M} : x ∈ lieSpan R L s ↔ ∀ N : LieSubmodule R L M, s ⊆ N → x ∈ N := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, lieSpan, sInf_coe]
exact mem_iInter₂
theorem subset_lieSpan : s ⊆ lieSpan R L s := by
intro m hm
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN
exact hN hm
theorem submodule_span_le_lieSpan : Submodule.span R s ≤ lieSpan R L s := by
rw [Submodule.span_le]
apply subset_lieSpan
@[simp]
theorem lieSpan_le {N} : lieSpan R L s ≤ N ↔ s ⊆ N := by
constructor
· exact Subset.trans subset_lieSpan
· intro hs m hm; rw [mem_lieSpan] at hm; exact hm _ hs
theorem lieSpan_mono {t : Set M} (h : s ⊆ t) : lieSpan R L s ≤ lieSpan R L t := by
rw [lieSpan_le]
exact Subset.trans h subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : lieSpan R L (N : Set M) = N :=
le_antisymm (lieSpan_le.mpr rfl.subset) subset_lieSpan
theorem coe_lieSpan_submodule_eq_iff {p : Submodule R M} :
(lieSpan R L (p : Set M) : Submodule R M) = p ↔ ∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p := by
rw [p.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff L]; constructor <;> intro h
· intro x m hm; rw [← h, mem_toSubmodule]; exact lie_mem _ (subset_lieSpan hm)
· rw [← toSubmodule_mk p @h, coe_toSubmodule, toSubmodule_inj, lieSpan_eq]
variable (R L M)
/-- `lieSpan` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from `LieSubmodule` to `Set`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (lieSpan R L : Set M → LieSubmodule R L M) (↑) where
choice s _ := lieSpan R L s
gc _ _ := lieSpan_le
le_l_u _ := subset_lieSpan
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : lieSpan R L (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : lieSpan R L (Set.univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq_bot_iff : lieSpan R L s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, m = (0 : M) := by
rw [_root_.eq_bot_iff, lieSpan_le, bot_coe, subset_singleton_iff]
variable {M}
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : lieSpan R L (s ∪ t) = lieSpan R L s ⊔ lieSpan R L t :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_sup
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : lieSpan R L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, lieSpan R L (s i) :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_iSup
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition, scalar multiplication and the Lie bracket, then `p` holds for all
elements of the Lie submodule spanned by `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem lieSpan_induction {p : (x : M) → x ∈ lieSpan R L s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_lieSpan h))
(zero : p 0 (LieSubmodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx)) {x}
(lie : ∀ (x : L) (y hy), p y hy → p (⁅x, y⁆) (LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ ‹_›))
(hx : x ∈ lieSpan R L s) : p x hx := by
let p : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
add_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hpx⟩
lie_mem := fun ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, lie _ _ _ hpy⟩ }
exact lieSpan_le (N := p) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_lieSpan hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
lemma isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton (m : M) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement (lieSpan R L {m}) := by
rw [CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro s hne hdir hsup
replace hsup : m ∈ (↑(sSup s) : Set M) := (SetLike.le_def.mp hsup) (subset_lieSpan rfl)
suffices (↑(sSup s) : Set M) = ⋃ N ∈ s, ↑N by
obtain ⟨N : LieSubmodule R L M, hN : N ∈ s, hN' : m ∈ N⟩ := by
simp_rw [this, Set.mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop] at hsup; assumption
exact ⟨N, hN, by simpa⟩
replace hne : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hne
have := Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val
simp_rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, Set.iUnion_coe_set, coe_toSubmodule] at this
rw [← this, SetLike.coe_set_eq, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_subtype]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton : sSup ((fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N) = N := by
refine le_antisymm (sSup_le <| by simp) ?_
simp_rw [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sSup_toSubmodule, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine fun m hm ↦ Submodule.mem_sSup.mpr fun N' hN' ↦ ?_
replace hN' : ∀ m ∈ N, lieSpan R L {m} ≤ N' := by simpa using hN'
exact hN' _ hm (subset_lieSpan rfl)
instance instIsCompactlyGenerated : IsCompactlyGenerated (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N ↦ ⟨(fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N, fun _ ⟨m, _, hm⟩ ↦
hm ▸ isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton R L m, N.sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton⟩⟩
end LieSpan
end LatticeStructure
end LieSubmodule
section LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂} {M : Type w} {M' : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieRing L'] [LieAlgebra R L']
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') (N N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L M')
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pushes forward Lie submodules of `M` to Lie submodules
of `M'`. -/
def map : LieSubmodule R L M' :=
{ (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m'} h ↦ by
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hfm⟩; use ⁅x, m⁆; constructor
· apply N.lie_mem hm
· norm_cast at hfm; simp [hfm] }
@[simp] theorem coe_map : (N.map f : Set M') = f '' N := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_map : (N.map f : Submodule R M') = (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_map := toSubmodule_map
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pulls back Lie submodules of `M'` to Lie submodules of
`M`. -/
def comap : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
suffices ⁅x, f m⁆ ∈ N' by simp [this]
apply N'.lie_mem h }
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_comap :
(N'.comap f : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_comap := toSubmodule_comap
variable {f N N₂ N'}
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f N ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ comap f N' :=
Set.image_subset_iff
variable (f) in
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem map_inf_le : (N ⊓ N₂).map f ≤ N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_inter_subset f N N₂
theorem map_inf (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(N ⊓ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
@[simp]
theorem map_sup : (N ⊔ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊔ N₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf {N₂' : LieSubmodule R L M'} :
(N' ⊓ N₂').comap f = N'.comap f ⊓ N₂'.comap f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(⨆ i, N i).map f = ⨆ i, (N i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_map (m' : M') : m' ∈ N.map f ↔ ∃ m, m ∈ N ∧ f m = m' :=
Submodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {m : M} (h : m ∈ N) : f m ∈ N.map f :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {m : M} : m ∈ comap f N' ↔ f m ∈ N' :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_incl_eq_top : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊤ ↔ N ≤ N₂ := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_comap, LieSubmodule.incl_coe,
LieSubmodule.top_toSubmodule, Submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top, toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule]
theorem comap_incl_eq_bot : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊥ ↔ N ⊓ N₂ = ⊥ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, bot_toSubmodule,
inf_toSubmodule]
rw [← Submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot, disjoint_iff]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem map_mono (h : N ≤ N₂) : N.map f ≤ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_subset _ h
theorem map_comp
{M'' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M''] [Module R M''] [LieRingModule L M''] {g : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M''} :
N.map (g.comp f) = (N.map f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [← Set.image_comp, coe_map, LinearMap.coe_comp, LieModuleHom.coe_comp]
@[simp]
theorem map_id : N.map LieModuleHom.id = N := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bot :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).map f = ⊥ := by
ext m; simp [eq_comm]
lemma map_le_map_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N.map f ≤ N₂.map f ↔ N ≤ N₂ :=
Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
lemma map_injective_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f) := fun {N N'} h ↦
SetLike.coe_injective <| hf.image_injective <| by simp only [← coe_map, h]
/-- An injective morphism of Lie modules embeds the lattice of submodules of the domain into that
of the target. -/
@[simps] def mapOrderEmbedding {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
LieSubmodule R L M ↪o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := LieSubmodule.map f
inj' := map_injective_of_injective hf
map_rel_iff' := Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
variable (N) in
/-- For an injective morphism of Lie modules, any Lie submodule is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N.map f :=
{ Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N with
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to specify `invFun` explicitly this way, otherwise we'd get a type mismatch
invFun := by exact DFunLike.coe (Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N).symm
map_lie' := by rintro x ⟨m, hm : m ∈ N⟩; ext; exact f.map_lie x m }
/-- An equivalence of Lie modules yields an order-preserving equivalence of their lattices of Lie
Submodules. -/
@[simps] def orderIsoMapComap (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
LieSubmodule R L M ≃o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := map e
invFun := comap e
left_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp
right_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp [e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
map_rel_iff' := fun {_ _} ↦ Set.image_subset_image_iff e.injective
end LieSubmodule
end LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
namespace LieModuleHom
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {N : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N]
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N)
/-- The kernel of a morphism of Lie algebras, as an ideal in the domain. -/
def ker : LieSubmodule R L M :=
LieSubmodule.comap f ⊥
@[simp]
theorem ker_toSubmodule : (f.ker : Submodule R M) = LinearMap.ker (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias ker_coeSubmodule := ker_toSubmodule
theorem ker_eq_bot : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ Function.Injective f := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, ker_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.bot_toSubmodule,
LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, coe_toLinearMap]
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ker {m : M} : m ∈ f.ker ↔ f m = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_id : (LieModuleHom.id : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M).ker = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_ker_incl : f.comp f.ker.incl = 0 := by ext ⟨m, hm⟩; exact mem_ker.mp hm
theorem le_ker_iff_map (M' : LieSubmodule R L M) : M' ≤ f.ker ↔ LieSubmodule.map f M' = ⊥ := by
rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, LieSubmodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
variable (f)
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` is a Lie submodule of `N`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range : LieSubmodule R L N :=
(LieSubmodule.map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_range : f.range = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_range : f.range = LinearMap.range (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_range := toSubmodule_range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (n : N) : n ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ m, f m = n :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_top : LieSubmodule.map f ⊤ = f.range := by ext; simp [LieSubmodule.mem_map]
theorem range_eq_top : f.range = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_range, LieSubmodule.top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` whose values lie in a Lie submodule `P ⊆ N` can be
restricted to a morphism of Lie modules `M → P`. -/
def codRestrict (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) :
M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P where
toFun := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
__ := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
map_lie' {x m} := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma codRestrict_apply (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) (m : M) :
(f.codRestrict P h m : N) = f m :=
rfl
end LieModuleHom
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
@[simp]
theorem ker_incl : N.incl.ker = ⊥ := (LieModuleHom.ker_eq_bot N.incl).mpr <| injective_incl N
@[simp]
theorem range_incl : N.incl.range = N := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, LieModuleHom.toSubmodule_range, incl_coe]
rw [Submodule.range_subtype]
@[simp]
theorem comap_incl_self : comap N.incl N = ⊤ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, top_toSubmodule]
rw [Submodule.comap_subtype_self]
theorem map_incl_top : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L N).map N.incl = N := by simp
variable {N}
@[simp]
lemma map_le_range {M' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
N.map f ≤ f.range := by
rw [← LieModuleHom.map_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_lt_iff_lt_top {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map (LieSubmodule.incl N) < N ↔ N' < ⊤ := by
convert (LieSubmodule.mapOrderEmbedding (f := N.incl) Subtype.coe_injective).lt_iff_lt
simp
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_le {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map N.incl ≤ N := by
conv_rhs => rw [← N.map_incl_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
end LieSubmodule
section TopEquiv
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie submodule and the enclosing Lie module. -/
def LieModuleEquiv.ofTop : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ LinearEquiv.ofTop ⊤ rfl with
map_lie' := rfl }
variable {R L}
lemma LieModuleEquiv.ofTop_apply (x : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M)) :
LieModuleEquiv.ofTop R L M x = x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma LieModuleEquiv.range_coe {M' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
LieModuleHom.range (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') = ⊤ := by
rw [LieModuleHom.range_eq_top]
exact e.surjective
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie subalgebra and the enclosing Lie algebra.
This is the Lie subalgebra version of `Submodule.topEquiv`. -/
def LieSubalgebra.topEquiv : (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
{ (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L).incl with
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x, Set.mem_univ x⟩
left_inv := fun x ↦ by ext; rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem LieSubalgebra.topEquiv_apply (x : (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L)) : LieSubalgebra.topEquiv x = x :=
rfl
end TopEquiv
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 1,281 | 1,284 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,492 | 1,494 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Hua. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Johan Commelin, Reid Barton, Robert Y. Lewis, Joseph Hua
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.IsTerminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
/-!
# Algebras of endofunctors
This file defines (co)algebras of an endofunctor, and provides the category instance for them.
It also defines the forgetful functor from the category of (co)algebras. It is shown that the
structure map of the initial algebra of an endofunctor is an isomorphism. Furthermore, it is shown
that for an adjunction `F ⊣ G` the category of algebras over `F` is equivalent to the category of
coalgebras over `G`.
## TODO
* Prove that if the countable infinite product over the powers of the endofunctor exists, then
algebras over the endofunctor coincide with algebras over the free monad on the endofunctor.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Endofunctor
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An algebra of an endofunctor; `str` stands for "structure morphism" -/
structure Algebra (F : C ⥤ C) where
/-- carrier of the algebra -/
a : C
/-- structure morphism of the algebra -/
str : F.obj a ⟶ a
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Algebra (𝟭 C)) :=
⟨⟨default, 𝟙 _⟩⟩
namespace Algebra
variable {F : C ⥤ C} (A : Algebra F) {A₀ A₁ A₂ : Algebra F}
/-
```
str
F A₀ -----> A₀
| |
F f | | f
V V
F A₁ -----> A₁
str
```
-/
/-- A morphism between algebras of endofunctor `F` -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A₀ A₁ : Algebra F) where
/-- underlying morphism between the carriers -/
f : A₀.1 ⟶ A₁.1
/-- compatibility condition -/
h : F.map f ≫ A₁.str = A₀.str ≫ f := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.h
namespace Hom
/-- The identity morphism of an algebra of endofunctor `F` -/
def id : Hom A A where f := 𝟙 _
instance : Inhabited (Hom A A) :=
⟨{ f := 𝟙 _ }⟩
/-- The composition of morphisms between algebras of endofunctor `F` -/
def comp (f : Hom A₀ A₁) (g : Hom A₁ A₂) : Hom A₀ A₂ where f := f.1 ≫ g.1
end Hom
instance (F : C ⥤ C) : CategoryStruct (Algebra F) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := @Hom.comp _ _ _
@[ext]
lemma ext {A B : Algebra F} {f g : A ⟶ B} (w : f.f = g.f := by aesop_cat) : f = g :=
Hom.ext w
@[simp]
theorem id_eq_id : Algebra.Hom.id A = 𝟙 A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_f : (𝟙 _ : A ⟶ A).1 = 𝟙 A.1 :=
rfl
variable (f : A₀ ⟶ A₁) (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_comp : Algebra.Hom.comp f g = f ≫ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_f : (f ≫ g).1 = f.1 ≫ g.1 :=
rfl
/-- Algebras of an endofunctor `F` form a category -/
instance (F : C ⥤ C) : Category (Algebra F) := { }
/-- To construct an isomorphism of algebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the As which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps!]
def isoMk (h : A₀.1 ≅ A₁.1) (w : F.map h.hom ≫ A₁.str = A₀.str ≫ h.hom := by aesop_cat) :
A₀ ≅ A₁ where
hom := { f := h.hom }
inv :=
{ f := h.inv
h := by
rw [h.eq_comp_inv, Category.assoc, ← w, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
simp }
/-- The forgetful functor from the category of algebras, forgetting the algebraic structure. -/
@[simps]
def forget (F : C ⥤ C) : Algebra F ⥤ C where
obj A := A.1
map := Hom.f
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying isomorphism hom in `C` is an algebra isomorphism. -/
theorem iso_of_iso (f : A₀ ⟶ A₁) [IsIso f.1] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.1
h := by
rw [IsIso.eq_comp_inv f.1, Category.assoc, ← f.h]
simp }, by aesop_cat, by aesop_cat⟩⟩
instance forget_reflects_iso : (forget F).ReflectsIsomorphisms where reflects := iso_of_iso
instance forget_faithful : (forget F).Faithful := { }
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying epimorphism hom in `C` is an algebra epimorphism. -/
theorem epi_of_epi {X Y : Algebra F} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Epi f.1] : Epi f :=
(forget F).epi_of_epi_map h
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying monomorphism hom in `C` is an algebra monomorphism. -/
theorem mono_of_mono {X Y : Algebra F} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Mono f.1] : Mono f :=
(forget F).mono_of_mono_map h
/-- From a natural transformation `α : G → F` we get a functor from
algebras of `F` to algebras of `G`.
-/
@[simps]
def functorOfNatTrans {F G : C ⥤ C} (α : G ⟶ F) : Algebra F ⥤ Algebra G where
obj A :=
{ a := A.1
str := α.app _ ≫ A.str }
map f := { f := f.1 }
/-- The identity transformation induces the identity endofunctor on the category of algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def functorOfNatTransId : functorOfNatTrans (𝟙 F) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => isoMk (Iso.refl _)
/-- A composition of natural transformations gives the composition of corresponding functors. -/
@[simps!]
def functorOfNatTransComp {F₀ F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ C} (α : F₀ ⟶ F₁) (β : F₁ ⟶ F₂) :
functorOfNatTrans (α ≫ β) ≅ functorOfNatTrans β ⋙ functorOfNatTrans α :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => isoMk (Iso.refl _)
/--
If `α` and `β` are two equal natural transformations, then the functors of algebras induced by them
are isomorphic.
We define it like this as opposed to using `eq_to_iso` so that the components are nicer to prove
lemmas about.
-/
@[simps!]
def functorOfNatTransEq {F G : C ⥤ C} {α β : F ⟶ G} (h : α = β) :
functorOfNatTrans α ≅ functorOfNatTrans β :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun X => isoMk (Iso.refl _)
/-- Naturally isomorphic endofunctors give equivalent categories of algebras.
Furthermore, they are equivalent as categories over `C`, that is,
we have `equiv_of_nat_iso h ⋙ forget = forget`.
-/
@[simps]
def equivOfNatIso {F G : C ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : Algebra F ≌ Algebra G where
functor := functorOfNatTrans α.inv
inverse := functorOfNatTrans α.hom
unitIso := functorOfNatTransId.symm ≪≫ functorOfNatTransEq (by simp) ≪≫ functorOfNatTransComp _ _
counitIso :=
(functorOfNatTransComp _ _).symm ≪≫ functorOfNatTransEq (by simp) ≪≫ functorOfNatTransId
namespace Initial
variable {A : Algebra F} (h : Limits.IsInitial A)
/-- The inverse of the structure map of an initial algebra -/
@[simp]
def strInv : A.1 ⟶ F.obj A.1 :=
(h.to ⟨F.obj A.a, F.map A.str⟩).f
theorem left_inv' :
⟨strInv h ≫ A.str, by rw [← Category.assoc, F.map_comp, strInv, ← Hom.h]⟩ = 𝟙 A :=
Limits.IsInitial.hom_ext h _ (𝟙 A)
theorem left_inv : strInv h ≫ A.str = 𝟙 _ :=
congr_arg Hom.f (left_inv' h)
theorem right_inv : A.str ≫ strInv h = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [strInv, ← (h.to ⟨F.obj A.1, F.map A.str⟩).h, ← F.map_id, ← F.map_comp]
congr
exact left_inv h
/-- The structure map of the initial algebra is an isomorphism,
hence endofunctors preserve their initial algebras
-/
theorem str_isIso (h : Limits.IsInitial A) : IsIso A.str :=
{ out := ⟨strInv h, right_inv _, left_inv _⟩ }
end Initial
end Algebra
/-- A coalgebra of an endofunctor; `str` stands for "structure morphism" -/
structure Coalgebra (F : C ⥤ C) where
/-- carrier of the coalgebra -/
V : C
/-- structure morphism of the coalgebra -/
str : V ⟶ F.obj V
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Coalgebra (𝟭 C)) :=
⟨⟨default, 𝟙 _⟩⟩
namespace Coalgebra
variable {F : C ⥤ C} (V : Coalgebra F) {V₀ V₁ V₂ : Coalgebra F}
| /-
```
str
V₀ -----> F V₀
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Endofunctor/Algebra.lean | 238 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.PresheafedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Elementwise
/-!
# `PresheafedSpace C` has colimits.
If `C` has limits, then the category `PresheafedSpace C` has colimits,
and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves these colimits.
When restricted to a diagram where the underlying continuous maps are open embeddings,
this says that we can glue presheaved spaces.
Given a diagram `F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace C`,
we first build the colimit of the underlying topological spaces,
as `colimit (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C)`. Call that colimit space `X`.
Our strategy is to push each of the presheaves `F.obj j`
forward along the continuous map `colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j` to `X`.
Since pushforward is functorial, we obtain a diagram `J ⥤ (presheaf C X)ᵒᵖ`
of presheaves on a single space `X`.
(Note that the arrows now point the other direction,
because this is the way `PresheafedSpace C` is set up.)
The limit of this diagram then constitutes the colimit presheaf.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v' u' v u
open CategoryTheory Opposite CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor CategoryTheory.Limits
TopCat TopCat.Presheaf TopologicalSpace
variable {J : Type u'} [Category.{v'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
namespace PresheafedSpace
attribute [local simp] eqToHom_map
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.auto_cases_opens
-- We would replace this by:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opens
-- although it doesn't appear to help in this file, in any case.
@[simp]
theorem map_id_c_app (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) (j) (U) :
(F.map (𝟙 j)).c.app U =
(Pushforward.id (F.obj j).presheaf).inv.app U ≫
(pushforwardEq (by simp) (F.obj j).presheaf).hom.app U := by
simp [PresheafedSpace.congr_app (F.map_id j)]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_c_app (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) {j₁ j₂ j₃}
(f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃) (U) :
(F.map (f ≫ g)).c.app U =
(F.map g).c.app U ≫
((pushforward C (F.map g).base).map (F.map f).c).app U ≫
(pushforwardEq (congr_arg Hom.base (F.map_comp f g).symm) _).hom.app U := by
simp [PresheafedSpace.congr_app (F.map_comp f g)]
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
/-- Given a diagram of `PresheafedSpace C`s, its colimit is computed by pushing the sheaves onto
the colimit of the underlying spaces, and taking componentwise limit.
This is the componentwise diagram for an open set `U` of the colimit of the underlying spaces.
-/
@[simps]
def componentwiseDiagram (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) [HasColimit F]
(U : Opens (Limits.colimit F).carrier) : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ C where
obj j := (F.obj (unop j)).presheaf.obj (op ((Opens.map (colimit.ι F (unop j)).base).obj U))
map {j k} f := (F.map f.unop).c.app _ ≫
(F.obj (unop k)).presheaf.map (eqToHom (by rw [← colimit.w F f.unop, comp_base]; rfl))
map_comp {i j k} f g := by
dsimp
simp only [assoc, CategoryTheory.NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
simp
variable [HasColimitsOfShape J TopCat.{v}]
/-- Given a diagram of presheafed spaces,
we can push all the presheaves forward to the colimit `X` of the underlying topological spaces,
obtaining a diagram in `(Presheaf C X)ᵒᵖ`.
-/
@[simps]
def pushforwardDiagramToColimit (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) :
J ⥤ (Presheaf C (colimit (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C)))ᵒᵖ where
obj j := op (colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j _* (F.obj j).presheaf)
map {j j'} f :=
((pushforward C (colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j')).map (F.map f).c ≫
(Pushforward.comp ((F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C).map f)
(colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j') (F.obj j).presheaf).inv ≫
(pushforwardEq (colimit.w (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) f) (F.obj j).presheaf).hom).op
map_id j := by
apply (opEquiv _ _).injective
refine NatTrans.ext (funext fun U => ?_)
induction U with
| op U =>
simp [opEquiv]
rfl
map_comp {j₁ j₂ j₃} f g := by
apply (opEquiv _ _).injective
refine NatTrans.ext (funext fun U => ?_)
dsimp [opEquiv]
have :
op ((Opens.map (F.map g).base).obj
((Opens.map (colimit.ι (F ⋙ forget C) j₃)).obj U.unop)) =
op ((Opens.map (colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j₂)).obj (unop U)) := by
apply unop_injective
rw [← Opens.map_comp_obj]
congr
exact colimit.w (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) g
simp only [map_comp_c_app, pushforward_obj_obj, pushforward_map_app, comp_base,
pushforwardEq_hom_app, op_obj, Opens.map_comp_obj, id_comp, assoc, eqToHom_map_comp,
NatTrans.naturality_assoc, pushforward_obj_map, eqToHom_unop]
simp [NatTrans.congr (α := (F.map f).c) this]
variable [∀ X : TopCat.{v}, HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ (X.Presheaf C)]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.instHasColimits`.
-/
def colimit (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) : PresheafedSpace C where
carrier := Limits.colimit (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C)
presheaf := limit (pushforwardDiagramToColimit F).leftOp
@[simp]
theorem colimit_carrier (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) :
(colimit F).carrier = Limits.colimit (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem colimit_presheaf (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) :
(colimit F).presheaf = limit (pushforwardDiagramToColimit F).leftOp :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition for `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.instHasColimits`.
-/
@[simps]
def colimitCocone (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) : Cocone F where
pt := colimit F
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
{ base := colimit.ι (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) j
c := limit.π _ (op j) }
naturality := fun {j j'} f => by
ext1
· ext x
exact colimit.w_apply (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) f x
· ext ⟨U, hU⟩
dsimp [-Presheaf.comp_app]
rw [PresheafedSpace.id_c_app, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
rw [NatTrans.comp_app, PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, whiskerRight_app, eqToHom_app,
← congr_arg NatTrans.app (limit.w (pushforwardDiagramToColimit F).leftOp f.op),
NatTrans.comp_app, Functor.leftOp_map, pushforwardDiagramToColimit_map]
simp }
variable [HasLimitsOfShape Jᵒᵖ C]
namespace ColimitCoconeIsColimit
/-- Auxiliary definition for `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.colimitCoconeIsColimit`.
-/
def descCApp (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) (s : Cocone F) (U : (Opens s.pt.carrier)ᵒᵖ) :
s.pt.presheaf.obj U ⟶
(colimit.desc (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) ((PresheafedSpace.forget C).mapCocone s) _*
limit (pushforwardDiagramToColimit F).leftOp).obj
U := by
refine
limit.lift _
{ pt := s.pt.presheaf.obj U
π :=
{ app := fun j => ?_
naturality := fun j j' f => ?_ } } ≫
(limitObjIsoLimitCompEvaluation _ _).inv
-- We still need to construct the `app` and `naturality'` fields omitted above.
· refine (s.ι.app (unop j)).c.app U ≫ (F.obj (unop j)).presheaf.map (eqToHom ?_)
dsimp
rw [← Opens.map_comp_obj]
simp
· dsimp
rw [PresheafedSpace.congr_app (s.w f.unop).symm U]
have w :=
Functor.congr_obj
(congr_arg Opens.map (colimit.ι_desc ((PresheafedSpace.forget C).mapCocone s) (unop j)))
(unop U)
simp only [Opens.map_comp_obj_unop] at w
replace w := congr_arg op w
have w' := NatTrans.congr (F.map f.unop).c w
rw [w']
simp
theorem desc_c_naturality (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) (s : Cocone F)
{U V : (Opens s.pt.carrier)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
s.pt.presheaf.map i ≫ descCApp F s V =
descCApp F s U ≫
(colimit.desc (F ⋙ forget C) ((forget C).mapCocone s) _* (colimitCocone F).pt.presheaf).map
i := by
dsimp [descCApp]
refine limit_obj_ext (fun j => ?_)
have w := Functor.congr_hom (congr_arg Opens.map
(colimit.ι_desc ((PresheafedSpace.forget C).mapCocone s) (unop j))) i.unop
simp only [Opens.map_comp_map] at w
simp [congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op w]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.colimitCoconeIsColimit`.
-/
def desc (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) (s : Cocone F) : colimit F ⟶ s.pt where
base := colimit.desc (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) ((PresheafedSpace.forget C).mapCocone s)
c :=
{ app := fun U => descCApp F s U
naturality := fun _ _ i => desc_c_naturality F s i }
theorem desc_fac (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) (s : Cocone F) (j : J) :
(colimitCocone F).ι.app j ≫ desc F s = s.ι.app j := by
ext U
· simp [desc]
· -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): the original proof is just `ext; dsimp [desc, descCApp]; simpa`,
-- but this has to be expanded a bit
rw [NatTrans.comp_app, PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, whiskerRight_app]
dsimp [desc, descCApp]
simp only [eqToHom_app, op_obj, Opens.map_comp_obj, eqToHom_map, Functor.leftOp, assoc]
rw [limitObjIsoLimitCompEvaluation_inv_π_app_assoc]
simp
end ColimitCoconeIsColimit
open ColimitCoconeIsColimit
/-- Auxiliary definition for `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.instHasColimits`.
-/
def colimitCoconeIsColimit (F : J ⥤ PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) :
IsColimit (colimitCocone F) where
desc s := desc F s
fac s := desc_fac F s
uniq s m w := by
-- We need to use the identity on the continuous maps twice, so we prepare that first:
have t :
m.base =
colimit.desc (F ⋙ PresheafedSpace.forget C) ((PresheafedSpace.forget C).mapCocone s) := by
dsimp
-- `colimit.hom_ext` used to be automatically applied by `ext` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/21302
apply colimit.hom_ext fun j => ?_
ext
rw [colimit.ι_desc, mapCocone_ι_app, ← w j]
simp
ext : 1
· exact t
· refine NatTrans.ext (funext fun U => limit_obj_ext fun j => ?_)
simp [desc, descCApp,
PresheafedSpace.congr_app (w (unop j)).symm U,
NatTrans.congr (limit.π (pushforwardDiagramToColimit F).leftOp j)
(congr_arg op (Functor.congr_obj (congr_arg Opens.map t) (unop U)))]
instance : HasColimitsOfShape J (PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) where
has_colimit F := ⟨colimitCocone F, colimitCoconeIsColimit F⟩
|
instance : PreservesColimitsOfShape J (PresheafedSpace.forget.{u, v, v} C) :=
⟨fun {F} => preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone (colimitCoconeIsColimit F) <| by
apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit _)
fapply Cocones.ext
· rfl
· intro j
simp⟩
/-- When `C` has limits, the category of presheaved spaces with values in `C` itself has colimits.
-/
instance instHasColimits [HasLimits C] : HasColimits (PresheafedSpace.{_, _, v} C) :=
⟨fun {_ _} => ⟨fun {F} => ⟨colimitCocone F, colimitCoconeIsColimit F⟩⟩⟩
/-- The underlying topological space of a colimit of presheaved spaces is
the colimit of the underlying topological spaces.
-/
instance forget_preservesColimits [HasLimits C] :
PreservesColimits (PresheafedSpace.forget.{_, _, v} C) where
preservesColimitsOfShape {J 𝒥} :=
{ preservesColimit := fun {F} => preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/PresheafedSpace/HasColimits.lean | 266 | 286 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
| rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 302 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Periodic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Periodic.lean | 267 | 274 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of sums etc
In this file we prove formulas about derivatives of `f + g`, `-f`, `f - g`, and `∑ i, f i x` for
functions from the base field to a normed space over this field.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L := by
simpa using (hf.add hg).hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x := by simpa using (hf.add hg).hasStrictDerivAt
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.add (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
theorem derivWithin_add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + g y) s x = derivWithin f s x + derivWithin g s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hf.hasDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (fun y => f y + g y) x = deriv f x + deriv g x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.add hg.hasDerivAt).deriv
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasStrictDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAt_add_const_iff
theorem derivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + c) s x = derivWithin f s x := by
simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_add_const]
theorem deriv_add_const (c : F) : deriv (fun y => f y + c) x = deriv f x := by
simp only [deriv, fderiv_add_const]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add_const' (c : F) : (deriv fun y => f y + c) = deriv f :=
funext fun _ => deriv_add_const c
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivAtFilter (c + f ·) f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAtFilter.const_add⟩ := hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasStrictDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (c + f ·) f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivWithinAt.const_add⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) : HasDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasDerivAt_const_add_iff
theorem derivWithin_const_add (c : F) :
derivWithin (c + f ·) s x = derivWithin f s x := by
simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_const_add]
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_const_add_fun (c : F) :
derivWithin (c + f ·) = derivWithin f := by
ext
apply derivWithin_const_add
theorem deriv_const_add (c : F) : deriv (c + f ·) x = deriv f x := by
simp only [deriv, fderiv_const_add]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_const_add' (c : F) : (deriv (c + f ·)) = deriv f :=
funext fun _ => deriv_const_add c
lemma differentiableAt_comp_const_add {a b : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (b + x)) a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (b + a) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H.comp _ (differentiable_id.const_add _).differentiableAt⟩
convert DifferentiableAt.comp (b + a) (by simpa)
(differentiable_id.const_add (-b)).differentiableAt
ext
simp
lemma differentiableAt_comp_add_const {a b : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (x + b)) a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (a + b) := by
simpa [add_comm b] using differentiableAt_comp_const_add (f := f) (b := b)
lemma differentiableAt_iff_comp_const_add {a b : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (b + x)) (-b + a) := by
simp [differentiableAt_comp_const_add]
lemma differentiableAt_iff_comp_add_const {a b : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (x + b)) (a - b) := by
simp [differentiableAt_comp_add_const]
end Add
section Sum
/-! ### Derivative of a finite sum of functions -/
variable {ι : Type*} {u : Finset ι} {A : ι → 𝕜 → F} {A' : ι → F}
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasDerivAtFilter (A i) (A' i) x L) :
HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x L := by
simpa [ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply] using (HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h).hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x := by
simpa [ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply] using (HasStrictFDerivAt.sum h).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasDerivWithinAt (A i) (A' i) s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) s x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.sum h
theorem HasDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.sum h
theorem derivWithin_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x = ∑ i ∈ u, derivWithin (A i) s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (HasDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
deriv (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x = ∑ i ∈ u, deriv (A i) x :=
(HasDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasDerivAt).deriv
end Sum
section Neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.neg (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasDerivAtFilter (fun x => -f x) (-f') x L := by simpa using h.neg.hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.neg (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.neg (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.neg (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x := by simpa using h.neg.hasStrictDerivAt
theorem derivWithin.neg : derivWithin (fun y => -f y) s x = -derivWithin f s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_neg hsx, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply]
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem deriv.neg : deriv (fun y => -f y) x = -deriv f x := by
simp only [deriv, fderiv_neg, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply]
@[simp]
theorem deriv.neg' : (deriv fun y => -f y) = fun x => -deriv f x :=
funext fun _ => deriv.neg
end Neg
section Neg2
/-! ### Derivative of the negation function (i.e `Neg.neg`) -/
variable (s x L)
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_neg : HasDerivAtFilter Neg.neg (-1) x L :=
HasDerivAtFilter.neg <| hasDerivAtFilter_id _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_neg : HasDerivWithinAt Neg.neg (-1) s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_neg _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_neg : HasDerivAt Neg.neg (-1) x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_neg _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_neg' : HasDerivAt (fun x => -x) (-1) x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_neg _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_neg : HasStrictDerivAt Neg.neg (-1) x :=
HasStrictDerivAt.neg <| hasStrictDerivAt_id _
theorem deriv_neg : deriv Neg.neg x = -1 :=
HasDerivAt.deriv (hasDerivAt_neg x)
@[simp]
theorem deriv_neg' : deriv (Neg.neg : 𝕜 → 𝕜) = fun _ => -1 :=
funext deriv_neg
@[simp]
theorem deriv_neg'' : deriv (fun x : 𝕜 => -x) x = -1 :=
deriv_neg x
theorem derivWithin_neg (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin Neg.neg s x = -1 :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_neg x s).derivWithin hxs
theorem differentiable_neg : Differentiable 𝕜 (Neg.neg : 𝕜 → 𝕜) :=
Differentiable.neg differentiable_id
theorem differentiableOn_neg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (Neg.neg : 𝕜 → 𝕜) s :=
DifferentiableOn.neg differentiableOn_id
lemma differentiableAt_comp_neg {a : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (-x)) a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (-a) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H.comp a differentiable_neg.differentiableAt⟩
convert ((neg_neg a).symm ▸ H).comp (-a) differentiable_neg.differentiableAt
ext
simp only [Function.comp_apply, neg_neg]
lemma differentiableAt_iff_comp_neg {a : 𝕜} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f a ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f (-x)) (-a) := by
simp_rw [← differentiableAt_comp_neg, neg_neg]
end Neg2
section Sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.sub (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g g' x L) :
HasDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
|
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.sub (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Add.lean | 297 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilie Burgun. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Burgun
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
/-!
# Period of a group action
This module defines some helpful lemmas around [`MulAction.period`] and [`AddAction.period`].
The period of a point `a` by a group element `g` is the smallest `m` such that `g ^ m • a = a`
(resp. `(m • g) +ᵥ a = a`) for a given `g : G` and `a : α`.
If such an `m` does not exist,
then by convention `MulAction.period` and `AddAction.period` return 0.
-/
namespace MulAction
universe u v
variable {α : Type v}
variable {G : Type u} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
variable {M : Type u} [Monoid M] [MulAction M α]
/-- If the action is periodic, then a lower bound for its period can be computed. -/
@[to_additive "If the action is periodic, then a lower bound for its period can be computed."]
theorem le_period {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (period_pos : 0 < period m a)
(moved : ∀ k, 0 < k → k < n → m ^ k • a ≠ a) : n ≤ period m a :=
le_of_not_gt fun period_lt_n =>
moved _ period_pos period_lt_n <| pow_period_smul m a
/-- If for some `n`, `m ^ n • a = a`, then `period m a ≤ n`. -/
@[to_additive "If for some `n`, `(n • m) +ᵥ a = a`, then `period m a ≤ n`."]
theorem period_le_of_fixed {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) (fixed : m ^ n • a = a) :
period m a ≤ n :=
(isPeriodicPt_smul_iff.mpr fixed).minimalPeriod_le n_pos
/-- If for some `n`, `m ^ n • a = a`, then `0 < period m a`. -/
@[to_additive "If for some `n`, `(n • m) +ᵥ a = a`, then `0 < period m a`."]
theorem period_pos_of_fixed {m : M} {a : α} {n : ℕ} (n_pos : 0 < n) (fixed : m ^ n • a = a) :
0 < period m a :=
(isPeriodicPt_smul_iff.mpr fixed).minimalPeriod_pos n_pos
@[to_additive]
| theorem period_eq_one_iff {m : M} {a : α} : period m a = 1 ↔ m • a = a :=
⟨fun eq_one => pow_one m ▸ eq_one ▸ pow_period_smul m a,
fun fixed => le_antisymm
(period_le_of_fixed one_pos (by simpa))
(period_pos_of_fixed one_pos (by simpa))⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Period.lean | 49 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Subsheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.CompatibleSheafification
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LocallyInjective
/-!
# Locally surjective morphisms
## Main definitions
- `IsLocallySurjective` : A morphism of presheaves valued in a concrete category is locally
surjective with respect to a Grothendieck topology if every section in the target is locally
in the set-theoretic image, i.e. the image sheaf coincides with the target.
## Main results
- `Presheaf.isLocallySurjective_toSheafify`: `toSheafify` is locally surjective.
- `Sheaf.isLocallySurjective_iff_epi`: a morphism of sheaves of types is locally
surjective iff it is epi
-/
universe v u w v' u' w'
open Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {A : Type u'} [Category.{v'} A] {FA : A → A → Type*} {CA : A → Type w'}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FA X Y) (CA X) (CA Y)] [ConcreteCategory.{w'} A FA]
namespace Presheaf
/-- Given `f : F ⟶ G`, a morphism between presieves, and `s : G.obj (op U)`, this is the sieve
of `U` consisting of the `i : V ⟶ U` such that `s` restricted along `i` is in the image of `f`. -/
@[simps -isSimp]
def imageSieve {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : C} (s : ToType (G.obj (op U))) : Sieve U where
arrows V i := ∃ t : ToType (F.obj (op V)), f.app _ t = G.map i.op s
downward_closed := by
rintro V W i ⟨t, ht⟩ j
refine ⟨F.map j.op t, ?_⟩
rw [op_comp, G.map_comp, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ht, NatTrans.naturality_apply f]
theorem imageSieve_eq_sieveOfSection {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : C}
(s : ToType (G.obj (op U))) :
imageSieve f s = (Subpresheaf.range (whiskerRight f (forget A))).sieveOfSection s :=
rfl
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
theorem imageSieve_whisker_forget {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : C} (s : ToType (G.obj (op U))) :
imageSieve (whiskerRight f (forget A)) s = imageSieve f s :=
rfl
theorem imageSieve_app {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : C} (s : ToType (F.obj (op U))) :
imageSieve f (f.app _ s) = ⊤ := by
ext V i
simp only [Sieve.top_apply, iff_true, imageSieve_apply]
exact ⟨F.map i.op s, NatTrans.naturality_apply f i.op s⟩
/-- If a morphism `g : V ⟶ U.unop` belongs to the sieve `imageSieve f s g`, then
this is choice of a preimage of `G.map g.op s` in `F.obj (op V)`, see
`app_localPreimage`. -/
noncomputable def localPreimage {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : Cᵒᵖ} (s : ToType (G.obj U))
{V : C} (g : V ⟶ U.unop) (hg : imageSieve f s g) :
ToType (F.obj (op V)) :=
hg.choose
@[simp]
lemma app_localPreimage {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) {U : Cᵒᵖ} (s : ToType (G.obj U))
{V : C} (g : V ⟶ U.unop) (hg : imageSieve f s g) :
f.app _ (localPreimage f s g hg) = G.map g.op s :=
hg.choose_spec
/-- A morphism of presheaves `f : F ⟶ G` is locally surjective with respect to a grothendieck
topology if every section of `G` is locally in the image of `f`. -/
class IsLocallySurjective {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) : Prop where
imageSieve_mem {U : C} (s : ToType (G.obj (op U))) : imageSieve f s ∈ J U
lemma imageSieve_mem {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) [IsLocallySurjective J f] {U : Cᵒᵖ}
(s : ToType (G.obj U)) : imageSieve f s ∈ J U.unop :=
IsLocallySurjective.imageSieve_mem _
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
instance {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) [IsLocallySurjective J f] :
IsLocallySurjective J (whiskerRight f (forget A)) where
imageSieve_mem s := imageSieve_mem J f s
theorem isLocallySurjective_iff_range_sheafify_eq_top {F G : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A} (f : F ⟶ G) :
IsLocallySurjective J f ↔ (Subpresheaf.range (whiskerRight f (forget A))).sheafify J = ⊤ := by
simp only [Subpresheaf.ext_iff, funext_iff, Set.ext_iff, Subpresheaf.top_obj,
Set.top_eq_univ, Set.mem_univ, iff_true]
exact ⟨fun H _ => H.imageSieve_mem, fun H => ⟨H _⟩⟩
| @[deprecated (since := "2025-01-26")]
alias isLocallySurjective_iff_imagePresheaf_sheafify_eq_top :=
isLocallySurjective_iff_range_sheafify_eq_top
attribute [local instance] Types.instFunLike Types.instConcreteCategory in
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/LocallySurjective.lean | 101 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
| @[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 555 | 558 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,979 | 2,981 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Basic
/-!
# Morphism properties that are inverted by a functor
In this file, we introduce the predicate `P.IsInvertedBy F` which expresses
that the morphisms satisfying `P : MorphismProperty C` are mapped to
isomorphisms by a functor `F : C ⥤ D`.
This is used in the localization of categories API (folder `CategoryTheory.Localization`).
-/
universe w v v' u u'
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace MorphismProperty
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
/-- If `P : MorphismProperty C` and `F : C ⥤ D`, then
`P.IsInvertedBy F` means that all morphisms in `P` are mapped by `F`
to isomorphisms in `D`. -/
def IsInvertedBy (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (_ : P f), IsIso (F.map f)
namespace IsInvertedBy
lemma of_le (P Q : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) (hQ : Q.IsInvertedBy F) (h : P ≤ Q) :
P.IsInvertedBy F :=
fun _ _ _ hf => hQ _ (h _ hf)
theorem of_comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category C₃]
(W : MorphismProperty C₁) (F : C₁ ⥤ C₂) (hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) (G : C₂ ⥤ C₃) :
W.IsInvertedBy (F ⋙ G) := fun X Y f hf => by
haveI := hF f hf
dsimp
infer_instance
theorem op {W : MorphismProperty C} {L : C ⥤ D} (h : W.IsInvertedBy L) : W.op.IsInvertedBy L.op :=
fun X Y f hf => by
haveI := h f.unop hf
dsimp
infer_instance
theorem rightOp {W : MorphismProperty C} {L : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (h : W.op.IsInvertedBy L) :
W.IsInvertedBy L.rightOp := fun X Y f hf => by
haveI := h f.op hf
dsimp
infer_instance
theorem leftOp {W : MorphismProperty C} {L : C ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (h : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
W.op.IsInvertedBy L.leftOp := fun X Y f hf => by
haveI := h f.unop hf
dsimp
infer_instance
theorem unop {W : MorphismProperty C} {L : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Dᵒᵖ} (h : W.op.IsInvertedBy L) :
W.IsInvertedBy L.unop := fun X Y f hf => by
haveI := h f.op hf
dsimp
infer_instance
lemma prod {C₁ C₂ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂]
{W₁ : MorphismProperty C₁} {W₂ : MorphismProperty C₂}
{E₁ E₂ : Type*} [Category E₁] [Category E₂] {F₁ : C₁ ⥤ E₁} {F₂ : C₂ ⥤ E₂}
(h₁ : W₁.IsInvertedBy F₁) (h₂ : W₂.IsInvertedBy F₂) :
(W₁.prod W₂).IsInvertedBy (F₁.prod F₂) := fun _ _ f hf => by
rw [isIso_prod_iff]
exact ⟨h₁ _ hf.1, h₂ _ hf.2⟩
lemma pi {J : Type w} {C : J → Type u} {D : J → Type u'}
[∀ j, Category.{v} (C j)] [∀ j, Category.{v'} (D j)]
(W : ∀ j, MorphismProperty (C j)) (F : ∀ j, C j ⥤ D j)
(hF : ∀ j, (W j).IsInvertedBy (F j)) :
(MorphismProperty.pi W).IsInvertedBy (Functor.pi F) := by
intro _ _ f hf
rw [isIso_pi_iff]
intro j
exact hF j _ (hf j)
end IsInvertedBy
/-- The full subcategory of `C ⥤ D` consisting of functors inverting morphisms in `W` -/
def FunctorsInverting (W : MorphismProperty C) (D : Type*) [Category D] :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun F : C ⥤ D => W.IsInvertedBy F
@[ext]
lemma FunctorsInverting.ext {W : MorphismProperty C} {F₁ F₂ : FunctorsInverting W D}
(h : F₁.obj = F₂.obj) : F₁ = F₂ := by
cases F₁
cases F₂
subst h
rfl
instance (W : MorphismProperty C) (D : Type*) [Category D] : Category (FunctorsInverting W D) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory.category _
@[ext]
lemma FunctorsInverting.hom_ext {W : MorphismProperty C} {F₁ F₂ : FunctorsInverting W D}
{α β : F₁ ⟶ F₂} (h : α.app = β.app) : α = β :=
NatTrans.ext h
/-- A constructor for `W.FunctorsInverting D` -/
def FunctorsInverting.mk {W : MorphismProperty C} {D : Type*} [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
(hF : W.IsInvertedBy F) : W.FunctorsInverting D :=
⟨F, hF⟩
theorem IsInvertedBy.iff_of_iso (W : MorphismProperty C) {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ D} (e : F₁ ≅ F₂) :
W.IsInvertedBy F₁ ↔ W.IsInvertedBy F₂ := by
dsimp [IsInvertedBy]
simp only [NatIso.isIso_map_iff e]
@[simp]
lemma IsInvertedBy.isoClosure_iff (W : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) :
W.isoClosure.IsInvertedBy F ↔ W.IsInvertedBy F := by
constructor
· intro h X Y f hf
exact h _ (W.le_isoClosure _ hf)
· intro h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
simp only [Arrow.iso_w' e, F.map_comp]
have := h _ hf'
infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma IsInvertedBy.iff_comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category C₃]
(W : MorphismProperty C₁) (F : C₁ ⥤ C₂) (G : C₂ ⥤ C₃) [G.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
W.IsInvertedBy (F ⋙ G) ↔ W.IsInvertedBy F := by
constructor
· intro h X Y f hf
have : IsIso (G.map (F.map f)) := h _ hf
exact isIso_of_reflects_iso (F.map f) G
· intro hF
exact IsInvertedBy.of_comp W F hF G
lemma IsInvertedBy.iff_le_inverseImage_isomorphisms (W : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) :
W.IsInvertedBy F ↔ W ≤ (isomorphisms D).inverseImage F := Iff.rfl
lemma IsInvertedBy.iff_map_le_isomorphisms (W : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) :
W.IsInvertedBy F ↔ W.map F ≤ isomorphisms D := by
rw [iff_le_inverseImage_isomorphisms, map_le_iff]
lemma IsInvertedBy.map_iff {C₁ C₂ C₃ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category C₃]
(W : MorphismProperty C₁) (F : C₁ ⥤ C₂) (G : C₂ ⥤ C₃) :
(W.map F).IsInvertedBy G ↔ W.IsInvertedBy (F ⋙ G) := by
simp only [IsInvertedBy.iff_map_le_isomorphisms, map_map]
end MorphismProperty
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/IsInvertedBy.lean | 161 | 163 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
/-!
# Product of homotopies
In this file, we introduce definitions for the product of
homotopies. We show that the products of relative homotopies
are still relative homotopies. Finally, we specialize to the case
of path homotopies, and provide the definition for the product of path classes.
We show various lemmas associated with these products, such as the fact that
path products commute with path composition, and that projection is the inverse
of products.
## Definitions
### General homotopies
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi homotopies`: Let f and g be a family of functions
indexed on I, such that for each i ∈ I, fᵢ and gᵢ are maps from A to Xᵢ.
Let `homotopies` be a family of homotopies from fᵢ to gᵢ for each i.
Then `Homotopy.pi homotopies` is the canonical homotopy
from ∏ f to ∏ g, where ∏ f is the product map from A to Πi, Xᵢ,
and similarly for ∏ g.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi homotopies`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.pi`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod F G` is the product of homotopies F and G,
where F is a homotopy between f₀ and f₁, G is a homotopy between g₀ and g₁.
The result F × G is a homotopy between (f₀ × g₀) and (f₁ × g₁).
Again, all homotopies are done relative to S.
- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod F G`: Same as `ContinuousMap.Homotopy.prod`, but
all homotopies are done relative to some set S ⊆ A.
### Path products
- `Path.Homotopic.pi` The product of a family of path classes, where a path class is an equivalence
class of paths up to path homotopy.
- `Path.Homotopic.prod` The product of two path classes.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
open ContinuousMap
section Pi
variable {I A : Type*} {X : I → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [TopologicalSpace A]
{f g : ∀ i, C(A, X i)} {S : Set A}
/-- The relative product homotopy of `homotopies` between functions `f` and `g` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.pi (homotopies : ∀ i : I, HomotopyRel (f i) (g i) S) :
HomotopyRel (pi f) (pi g) S :=
{ Homotopy.pi fun i => (homotopies i).toHomotopy with
prop' := by
intro t x hx
dsimp only [coe_mk, pi_eval, toFun_eq_coe, HomotopyWith.coe_toContinuousMap]
simp only [funext_iff, ← forall_and]
intro i
exact (homotopies i).prop' t x hx }
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {A : Type*} [TopologicalSpace A]
{f₀ f₁ : C(A, α)} {g₀ g₁ : C(A, β)} {S : Set A}
/-- The product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps]
def Homotopy.prod (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (G : Homotopy g₀ g₁) :
Homotopy (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₀ g₀) (ContinuousMap.prodMk f₁ g₁) where
toFun t := (F t, G t)
map_zero_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_zero]
map_one_left x := by simp only [prod_eval, Homotopy.apply_one]
/-- The relative product of homotopies `F` and `G`,
where `F` takes `f₀` to `f₁` and `G` takes `g₀` to `g₁` -/
@[simps!]
def HomotopyRel.prod (F : HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S) (G : HomotopyRel g₀ g₁ S) :
HomotopyRel (prodMk f₀ g₀) (prodMk f₁ g₁) S where
toHomotopy := Homotopy.prod F.toHomotopy G.toHomotopy
prop' t x hx := Prod.ext (F.prop' t x hx) (G.prop' t x hx)
end Prod
end ContinuousMap
namespace Path.Homotopic
attribute [local instance] Path.Homotopic.setoid
local infixl:70 " ⬝ " => Quotient.comp
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, X i}
/-- The product of a family of path homotopies. This is just a specialization of `HomotopyRel`. -/
def piHomotopy (γ₀ γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (H : ∀ i, Path.Homotopy (γ₀ i) (γ₁ i)) :
Path.Homotopy (Path.pi γ₀) (Path.pi γ₁) :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.pi H
/-- The product of a family of path homotopy classes. -/
def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs :=
(Quotient.map Path.pi fun x y hxy =>
Nonempty.map (piHomotopy x y) (Classical.nonempty_pi.mpr hxy)) (Quotient.choice γ)
theorem pi_lift (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) :
(Path.Homotopic.pi fun i => ⟦γ i⟧) = ⟦Path.pi γ⟧ := by unfold pi; simp
/-- Composition and products commute.
This is `Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans` descended to path homotopy classes. -/
theorem comp_pi_eq_pi_comp (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i))
(γ₁ : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (bs i) (cs i)) : pi γ₀ ⬝ pi γ₁ = pi fun i ↦ γ₀ i ⬝ γ₁ i := by
induction γ₁ using Quotient.induction_on_pi with | _ a =>
induction γ₀ using Quotient.induction_on_pi
simp only [pi_lift]
rw [← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans, ← pi_lift]
rfl
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the ith coordinate. -/
abbrev proj (i : ι) (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i) :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_apply i⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of pi. -/
@[simp]
theorem proj_pi (i : ι) (paths : ∀ i, Path.Homotopic.Quotient (as i) (bs i)) :
proj i (pi paths) = paths i := by
induction paths using Quotient.induction_on_pi
rw [proj, pi_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem pi_proj (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient as bs) : (pi fun i => proj i p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp_rw [proj, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
erw [pi_lift]
congr
end Pi
section Prod
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {a₁ a₂ a₃ : α} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : β}
{p₁ p₁' : Path a₁ a₂} {p₂ p₂' : Path b₁ b₂} (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂)
(q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂)
/-- The product of homotopies h₁ and h₂.
This is `HomotopyRel.prod` specialized for path homotopies. -/
def prodHomotopy (h₁ : Path.Homotopy p₁ p₁') (h₂ : Path.Homotopy p₂ p₂') :
Path.Homotopy (p₁.prod p₂) (p₁'.prod p₂') :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.prod h₁ h₂
/-- The product of path classes q₁ and q₂. This is `Path.prod` descended to the quotient. -/
def prod (q₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₁ a₂) (q₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₁ b₂) :
Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) :=
Quotient.map₂ Path.prod (fun _ _ h₁ _ _ h₂ => Nonempty.map2 prodHomotopy h₁ h₂) q₁ q₂
variable (p₁ p₁' p₂ p₂')
theorem prod_lift : prod ⟦p₁⟧ ⟦p₂⟧ = ⟦p₁.prod p₂⟧ :=
rfl
variable (r₁ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient a₂ a₃) (r₂ : Path.Homotopic.Quotient b₂ b₃)
/-- Products commute with path composition.
This is `trans_prod_eq_prod_trans` descended to the quotient. -/
theorem comp_prod_eq_prod_comp : prod q₁ q₂ ⬝ prod r₁ r₂ = prod (q₁ ⬝ r₁) (q₂ ⬝ r₂) := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
induction r₁, r₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
simp only [prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.comp_lift, Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans]
variable {c₁ c₂ : α × β}
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the left coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projLeft (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.1 c₂.1 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_fst⟩
/-- Abbreviation for projection onto the right coordinate of a path class. -/
abbrev projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁ c₂) : Path.Homotopic.Quotient c₁.2 c₂.2 :=
p.mapFn ⟨_, continuous_snd⟩
/-- Lemmas showing projection is the inverse of product. -/
@[simp]
theorem projLeft_prod : projLeft (prod q₁ q₂) = q₁ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projLeft, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem projRight_prod : projRight (prod q₁ q₂) = q₂ := by
induction q₁, q₂ using Quotient.inductionOn₂
rw [projRight, prod_lift, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift]
congr
@[simp]
theorem prod_projLeft_projRight (p : Path.Homotopic.Quotient (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)) :
prod (projLeft p) (projRight p) = p := by
induction p using Quotient.inductionOn
simp only [projLeft, projRight, ← Path.Homotopic.map_lift, prod_lift]
congr
end Prod
end Path.Homotopic
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Product.lean | 238 | 243 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
/-!
# Derivatives of `x ↦ x⁻¹` and `f x / g x`
In this file we prove `(x⁻¹)' = -1 / x ^ 2`, `((f x)⁻¹)' = -f' x / (f x) ^ 2`, and
`(f x / g x)' = (f' x * g x - f x * g' x) / (g x) ^ 2` for different notions of derivative.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u
open scoped Topology
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜}
section Inverse
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ x⁻¹` -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_inv (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt Inv.inv (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x := by
suffices
(fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => (p.1 - p.2) * ((x * x)⁻¹ - (p.1 * p.2)⁻¹)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p =>
(p.1 - p.2) * 1 by
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.congr' ?_ (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => mul_one _)
refine Eventually.mono ((isOpen_ne.prod isOpen_ne).mem_nhds ⟨hx, hx⟩) ?_
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ ⟨hy, hz⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq] at hy hz
-- hy : y ≠ 0, hz : z ≠ 0
field_simp [hx, hy, hz]
ring
refine (isBigO_refl (fun p : 𝕜 × 𝕜 => p.1 - p.2) _).mul_isLittleO ((isLittleO_one_iff 𝕜).2 ?_)
rw [← sub_self (x * x)⁻¹]
exact tendsto_const_nhds.sub ((continuous_mul.tendsto (x, x)).inv₀ <| mul_ne_zero hx hx)
theorem hasDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt (fun y => y⁻¹) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (s : Set 𝕜) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) s x :=
(hasDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem differentiableAt_inv_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun H => NormedField.continuousAt_inv.1 H.continuousAt, fun H =>
(hasDerivAt_inv H).differentiableAt⟩
theorem deriv_inv : deriv (fun x => x⁻¹) x = -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hne)
· simp [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (mt differentiableAt_inv_iff.1 (not_not.2 rfl))]
· exact (hasDerivAt_inv hne).deriv
@[simp]
theorem deriv_inv' : (deriv fun x : 𝕜 => x⁻¹) = fun x => -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ :=
funext fun _ => deriv_inv
theorem derivWithin_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin (fun x => x⁻¹) s x = -(x ^ 2)⁻¹ := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.derivWithin (differentiableAt_inv x_ne_zero) hxs]
exact deriv_inv
theorem hasFDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hasDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => x⁻¹) (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) s x :=
(hasFDerivAt_inv x_ne_zero).hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem fderiv_inv : fderiv 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) x = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) := by
rw [← deriv_fderiv, deriv_inv]
theorem fderivWithin_inv (x_ne_zero : x ≠ 0) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x => x⁻¹) s x = smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (-(x ^ 2)⁻¹) := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (differentiableAt_inv x_ne_zero) hxs]
exact fderiv_inv
variable {c : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {c' : 𝕜}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.inv (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y)⁻¹) (-c' / c x ^ 2) s x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_inv hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hc using 1
field_simp
theorem HasDerivAt.inv (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => (c y)⁻¹) (-c' / c x ^ 2) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.inv hx
theorem derivWithin_inv' (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
derivWithin (fun x => (c x)⁻¹) s x = -derivWithin c s x / c x ^ 2 := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hc.hasDerivWithinAt.inv hx).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_inv'' (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hx : c x ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x => (c x)⁻¹) x = -deriv c x / c x ^ 2 :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.inv hx).deriv
end Inverse
section Division
/-! ### Derivative of `x ↦ c x / d x` -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] {c d : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {c' d' : 𝕜'}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.div (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hd : HasDerivWithinAt d d' s x)
(hx : d x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y / d y) ((c' * d x - c x * d') / d x ^ 2) s x := by
convert hc.mul ((hasDerivAt_inv hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hd) using 1
| · simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, (· ∘ ·)]
· field_simp
ring
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Inv.lean | 132 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_eq_left]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_neg_cancel, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
zsmul_left_inj hp]
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, zsmul_left_inj hp]
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_left_mono hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_left_strictMono hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
end
/-!
| ### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 713 | 716 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.AssociatedPrime.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linter.DeprecatedModule
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-20")
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/AssociatedPrime.lean | 152 | 169 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Symmetric.Defs
/-!
# Vieta's Formula
The main result is `Multiset.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm`, which shows that the product of
linear terms `X + λ` with `λ` in a `Multiset s` is equal to a linear combination of the
symmetric functions `esymm s`.
From this, we deduce `MvPolynomial.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm` which is the equivalent formula
for the product of linear terms `X + X i` with `i` in a `Fintype σ` as a linear combination
of the symmetric polynomials `esymm σ R j`.
For `R` be an integral domain (so that `p.roots` is defined for any `p : R[X]` as a multiset),
we derive `Polynomial.coeff_eq_esymm_roots_of_card`, the relationship between the coefficients and
the roots of `p` for a polynomial `p` that splits (i.e. having as many roots as its degree).
-/
open Finset Polynomial
namespace Multiset
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A sum version of **Vieta's formula** for `Multiset`: the product of the linear terms `X + λ`
where `λ` runs through a multiset `s` is equal to a linear combination of the symmetric functions
`esymm s` of the `λ`'s . -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod =
∑ j ∈ Finset.range (Multiset.card s + 1), (C (s.esymm j) * X ^ (Multiset.card s - j)) := by
classical
rw [prod_map_add, antidiagonal_eq_map_powerset, map_map, ← bind_powerset_len,
map_bind, sum_bind, Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, Finset.range_val, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro _ _
rw [esymm, ← sum_hom', ← sum_map_mul_right, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro s ht
rw [mem_powersetCard] at ht
dsimp
rw [prod_hom' s (Polynomial.C : R →+* R[X])]
simp [ht, map_const, prod_replicate, prod_hom', map_id', card_sub]
/-- Vieta's formula for the coefficients of the product of linear terms `X + λ` where `λ` runs
through a multiset `s` : the `k`th coefficient is the symmetric function `esymm (card s - k) s`. -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff (s : Multiset R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod.coeff k = s.esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
convert Polynomial.ext_iff.mp (prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm s) k using 1
simp_rw [finset_sum_coeff, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (Multiset.card s - k) _]
· rw [if_pos (Nat.sub_sub_self h).symm]
· intro j hj1 hj2
suffices k ≠ card s - j by rw [if_neg this]
intro hn
rw [hn, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hj1))] at hj2
exact Ne.irrefl hj2
· rw [Finset.mem_range]
exact Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le (Multiset.card s) k)
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff' {σ} (s : Multiset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun i => X + C (r i)).prod.coeff k = (s.map r).esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
rw [← Function.comp_def (f := fun r => X + C r) (g := r), ← map_map, prod_X_add_C_coeff]
<;> rw [s.card_map r]; assumption
theorem _root_.Finset.prod_X_add_C_coeff {σ} (s : Finset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ #s) :
(∏ i ∈ s, (X + C (r i))).coeff k = ∑ t ∈ s.powersetCard (#s - k), ∏ i ∈ t, r i := by
rw [Finset.prod, prod_X_add_C_coeff' _ r h, Finset.esymm_map_val]
rfl
|
end Semiring
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Vieta.lean | 75 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Lattice
/-!
# Adding complements to a generalized Boolean algebra
This file embeds any generalized Boolean algebra into a Boolean algebra.
This concretely proves that any equation holding true in the theory of Boolean algebras that does
not reference `ᶜ` also holds true in the theory of generalized Boolean algebras. Put another way,
one does not need the existence of complements to prove something which does not talk about
complements.
## Main declarations
* `Booleanisation`: Boolean algebra containing a given generalised Boolean algebra as a sublattice.
* `Booleanisation.liftLatticeHom`: Boolean algebra containing a given generalised Boolean algebra as
a sublattice.
## Future work
If mathlib ever acquires `GenBoolAlg`, the category of generalised Boolean algebras, then one could
show that `Booleanisation` is the free functor from `GenBoolAlg` to `BoolAlg`.
-/
open Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Boolean algebra containing a given generalised Boolean algebra `α` as a sublattice.
This should be thought of as made of a copy of `α` (representing elements of `α`) living under
another copy of `α` (representing complements of elements of `α`). -/
def Booleanisation (α : Type*) := α ⊕ α
namespace Booleanisation
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Booleanisation α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (α ⊕ α)
/-- The natural inclusion `a ↦ a` from a generalized Boolean algebra to its generated Boolean
algebra. -/
@[match_pattern] def lift : α → Booleanisation α := Sum.inl
/-- The inclusion `a ↦ aᶜ from a generalized Boolean algebra to its generated Boolean algebra. -/
@[match_pattern] def comp : α → Booleanisation α := Sum.inr
/-- The complement operator on `Booleanisation α` sends `a` to `aᶜ` and `aᶜ` to `a`, for `a : α`. -/
instance instCompl : HasCompl (Booleanisation α) where
compl
| lift a => comp a
| comp a => lift a
@[simp] lemma compl_lift (a : α) : (lift a)ᶜ = comp a := rfl
@[simp] lemma compl_comp (a : α) : (comp a)ᶜ = lift a := rfl
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] {a b : α}
/-- The order on `Booleanisation α` is as follows: For `a b : α`,
* `a ≤ b` iff `a ≤ b` in `α`
* `a ≤ bᶜ` iff `a` and `b` are disjoint in `α`
* `aᶜ ≤ bᶜ` iff `b ≤ a` in `α`
* `¬ aᶜ ≤ b` -/
protected inductive LE : Booleanisation α → Booleanisation α → Prop
| protected lift {a b} : a ≤ b → Booleanisation.LE (lift a) (lift b)
| protected comp {a b} : a ≤ b → Booleanisation.LE (comp b) (comp a)
| protected sep {a b} : Disjoint a b → Booleanisation.LE (lift a) (comp b)
/-- The order on `Booleanisation α` is as follows: For `a b : α`,
* `a < b` iff `a < b` in `α`
* `a < bᶜ` iff `a` and `b` are disjoint in `α`
* `aᶜ < bᶜ` iff `b < a` in `α`
* `¬ aᶜ < b` -/
protected inductive LT : Booleanisation α → Booleanisation α → Prop
| protected lift {a b} : a < b → Booleanisation.LT (lift a) (lift b)
| protected comp {a b} : a < b → Booleanisation.LT (comp b) (comp a)
| protected sep {a b} : Disjoint a b → Booleanisation.LT (lift a) (comp b)
@[inherit_doc Booleanisation.LE]
instance instLE : LE (Booleanisation α) where
le := Booleanisation.LE
@[inherit_doc Booleanisation.LT]
instance instLT : LT (Booleanisation α) where
lt := Booleanisation.LT
/-- The supremum on `Booleanisation α` is as follows: For `a b : α`,
* `a ⊔ b` is `a ⊔ b`
* `a ⊔ bᶜ` is `(b \ a)ᶜ`
* `aᶜ ⊔ b` is `(a \ b)ᶜ`
* `aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ` is `(a ⊓ b)ᶜ` -/
instance instSup : Max (Booleanisation α) where
max
| lift a, lift b => lift (a ⊔ b)
| lift a, comp b => comp (b \ a)
| comp a, lift b => comp (a \ b)
| comp a, comp b => comp (a ⊓ b)
/-- The infimum on `Booleanisation α` is as follows: For `a b : α`,
* `a ⊓ b` is `a ⊓ b`
* `a ⊓ bᶜ` is `a \ b`
* `aᶜ ⊓ b` is `b \ a`
* `aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ` is `(a ⊔ b)ᶜ` -/
instance instInf : Min (Booleanisation α) where
min
| lift a, lift b => lift (a ⊓ b)
| lift a, comp b => lift (a \ b)
| comp a, lift b => lift (b \ a)
| comp a, comp b => comp (a ⊔ b)
/-- The bottom element of `Booleanisation α` is the bottom element of `α`. -/
instance instBot : Bot (Booleanisation α) where
bot := lift ⊥
/-- The top element of `Booleanisation α` is the complement of the bottom element of `α`. -/
instance instTop : Top (Booleanisation α) where
top := comp ⊥
/-- The difference operator on `Booleanisation α` is as follows: For `a b : α`,
* `a \ b` is `a \ b`
* `a \ bᶜ` is `a ⊓ b`
* `aᶜ \ b` is `(a ⊔ b)ᶜ`
* `aᶜ \ bᶜ` is `b \ a` -/
instance instSDiff : SDiff (Booleanisation α) where
sdiff
| lift a, lift b => lift (a \ b)
| lift a, comp b => lift (a ⊓ b)
| comp a, lift b => comp (a ⊔ b)
| comp a, comp b => lift (b \ a)
@[simp] lemma lift_le_lift : lift a ≤ lift b ↔ a ≤ b := ⟨by rintro ⟨_⟩; assumption, LE.lift⟩
| @[simp] lemma comp_le_comp : comp a ≤ comp b ↔ b ≤ a := ⟨by rintro ⟨_⟩; assumption, LE.comp⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Booleanisation.lean | 137 | 137 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (think s) = think (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [think, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]
@[simp]
theorem destruct_map (f : α → β) (s) : destruct (map f s) = lmap f (rmap (map f) (destruct s)) := by
apply s.recOn <;> intro <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Computation α, map id s = s
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; simp only [map, comp_apply, id_eq]
have e : @Option.rec α (fun _ => Option α) none some = id := by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
have h : ((fun x : Option α => x) = id) := rfl
simp [e, h, Stream'.map_id]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Computation α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_bind (a) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (pure a) f = f a := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = bind (pure a) f ∧ c₂ = f a ∨ c₁ = corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inr c₂)
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, _, Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ =>
simp only [BisimO, bind, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap, destruct_pure]
rcases destruct (f a) with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
| _, c, Or.inr rfl =>
simp only [BisimO, Bind.f, corec_eq, rmap]
rcases destruct c with b | cb <;> simp [Bind.g]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem think_bind (c) (f : α → Computation β) : bind (think c) f = think (bind c f) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [bind, Bind.f]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure (f : α → β) (s) : bind s (pure ∘ f) = map f s := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ => c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind s (pure ∘ f) ∧ c₂ = map f s
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp
· simpa using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure' (s : Computation α) : bind s pure = s := by
simpa using bind_pure id s
@[simp]
theorem bind_assoc (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) (g : β → Computation γ) :
bind (bind s f) g = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g := by
apply
eq_of_bisim fun c₁ c₂ =>
c₁ = c₂ ∨ ∃ s, c₁ = bind (bind s f) g ∧ c₂ = bind s fun x : α => bind (f x) g
· intro c₁ c₂ h
match c₁, c₂, h with
| _, c₂, Or.inl (Eq.refl _) => rcases destruct c₂ with b | cb <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩ =>
apply recOn s <;> intro s
· simp only [BisimO, ret_bind]; generalize f s = fs
apply recOn fs <;> intro t <;> simp
· rcases destruct (g t) with b | cb <;> simp
· simpa [BisimO] using Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m)
(h2 : Results (f a) b n) : Results (bind s f) b (n + m) := by
have := h1.mem; revert m
apply memRecOn this _ fun s IH => _
· intro _ h1
rw [ret_bind]
rw [h1.len_unique (results_pure _)]
exact h2
· intro _ h3 _ h1
rw [think_bind]
obtain ⟨m', h⟩ := of_results_think h1
obtain ⟨h1, e⟩ := h
rw [e]
exact results_think (h3 h1)
theorem mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : b ∈ f a) :
b ∈ bind s f :=
let ⟨_, h1⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h1
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h2
(results_bind h1 h2).mem
instance terminates_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : Terminates (bind s f) :=
terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem get_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [Terminates s]
[Terminates (f (get s))] : get (bind s f) = get (f (get s)) :=
get_eq_of_mem _ (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (f (get s))))
@[simp]
theorem length_bind (s : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) [_T1 : Terminates s]
[_T2 : Terminates (f (get s))] : length (bind s f) = length (f (get s)) + length s :=
(results_of_terminates _).len_unique <|
results_bind (results_of_terminates _) (results_of_terminates _)
theorem of_results_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b k} :
Results (bind s f) b k → ∃ a m n, Results s a m ∧ Results (f a) b n ∧ k = n + m := by
induction k generalizing s with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _
<;> apply recOn s (fun a => _) fun s' => _ <;> intro e h
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, _, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· have := congr_arg head (eq_thinkN h)
contradiction
· simp only [ret_bind] at h
exact ⟨e, _, n + 1, results_pure _, h, rfl⟩
· simp only [think_bind, results_think_iff] at h
let ⟨a, m, n', h1, h2, e'⟩ := IH h
rw [e']
exact ⟨a, m.succ, n', results_think h1, h2, rfl⟩
theorem exists_of_mem_bind {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {b} (h : b ∈ bind s f) :
∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_results_of_mem h
let ⟨a, _, _, h1, h2, _⟩ := of_results_bind h
⟨a, h1.mem, h2.mem⟩
theorem bind_promises {s : Computation α} {f : α → Computation β} {a b} (h1 : s ~> a)
(h2 : f a ~> b) : bind s f ~> b := fun b' bB => by
rcases exists_of_mem_bind bB with ⟨a', a's, ba'⟩
rw [← h1 a's] at ba'; exact h2 ba'
instance monad : Monad Computation where
map := @map
pure := @pure
bind := @bind
instance : LawfulMonad Computation := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := @map_id)
(bind_pure_comp := @bind_pure)
(pure_bind := @ret_bind)
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
theorem has_map_eq_map {β} (f : α → β) (c : Computation α) : f <$> c = map f c :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_def (a) : (return a : Computation α) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_pure' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (a), f <$> pure a = pure (f a) :=
map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_think' {α β} : ∀ (f : α → β) (s), f <$> think s = think (f <$> s) :=
map_think
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {a} {s : Computation α} (m : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s := by
rw [← bind_pure]; apply mem_bind m; apply ret_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Computation α} (h : b ∈ map f s) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
rw [← bind_pure] at h
let ⟨a, as, fb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
exact ⟨a, as, mem_unique (ret_mem _) fb⟩
instance terminates_map (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) [Terminates s] : Terminates (map f s) := by
rw [← bind_pure]; exact terminates_of_mem (mem_bind (get_mem s) (get_mem (α := β) (f (get s))))
theorem terminates_map_iff (f : α → β) (s : Computation α) : Terminates (map f s) ↔ Terminates s :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨_, h1, _⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
⟨⟨_, h1⟩⟩,
@Computation.terminates_map _ _ _ _⟩
-- Parallel computation
/-- `c₁ <|> c₂` calculates `c₁` and `c₂` simultaneously, returning
the first one that gives a result. -/
def orElse (c₁ : Computation α) (c₂ : Unit → Computation α) : Computation α :=
@Computation.corec α (Computation α × Computation α)
(fun ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ =>
match destruct c₁ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₁' =>
match destruct c₂ with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr c₂' => Sum.inr (c₁', c₂'))
(c₁, c₂ ())
instance instAlternativeComputation : Alternative Computation :=
{ Computation.monad with
orElse := @orElse
failure := @empty }
@[simp]
theorem ret_orElse (a : α) (c₂ : Computation α) : (pure a <|> c₂) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_pure (c₁ : Computation α) (a : α) : (think c₁ <|> pure a) = pure a :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_think (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : (think c₁ <|> think c₂) = think (c₁ <|> c₂) :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold_projs
simp [orElse]
@[simp]
theorem empty_orElse (c) : (empty α <|> c) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (empty α <|> c₂) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
@[simp]
theorem orElse_empty (c : Computation α) : (c <|> empty α) = c := by
apply eq_of_bisim (fun c₁ c₂ => (c₂ <|> empty α) = c₁) _ rfl
intro s' s h; rw [← h]
apply recOn s <;> intro s <;> rw [think_empty] <;> simp
rw [← think_empty]
/-- `c₁ ~ c₂` asserts that `c₁` and `c₂` either both terminate with the same result,
or both loop forever. -/
def Equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : Prop :=
∀ a, a ∈ c₁ ↔ a ∈ c₂
/-- equivalence relation for computations -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~ " => Equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl (s : Computation α) : s ~ s := fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm {s t : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ s := fun h a => (h a).symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans {s t u : Computation α} : s ~ t → t ~ u → s ~ u := fun h1 h2 a =>
(h1 a).trans (h2 a)
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
theorem equiv_of_mem {s t : Computation α} {a} (h1 : a ∈ s) (h2 : a ∈ t) : s ~ t := fun a' =>
⟨fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h1]; exact h2, fun ma => by rw [mem_unique ma h2]; exact h1⟩
theorem terminates_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) : Terminates c₁ ↔ Terminates c₂ := by
simp only [terminates_iff, exists_congr h]
theorem promises_congr {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) (a) : c₁ ~> a ↔ c₂ ~> a :=
forall_congr' fun a' => imp_congr (h a') Iff.rfl
theorem get_equiv {c₁ c₂ : Computation α} (h : c₁ ~ c₂) [Terminates c₁] [Terminates c₂] :
get c₁ = get c₂ :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (h _).2 <| get_mem _
theorem think_equiv (s : Computation α) : think s ~ s := fun _ => ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩
theorem thinkN_equiv (s : Computation α) (n) : thinkN s n ~ s := fun _ => thinkN_mem n
theorem bind_congr {s1 s2 : Computation α} {f1 f2 : α → Computation β} (h1 : s1 ~ s2)
(h2 : ∀ a, f1 a ~ f2 a) : bind s1 f1 ~ bind s2 f2 := fun b =>
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).1 ha) ((h2 a b).1 hb),
fun h =>
let ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind h
mem_bind ((h1 a).2 ha) ((h2 a b).2 hb)⟩
theorem equiv_pure_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : s ~ pure a :=
equiv_of_mem h (ret_mem _)
/-- `LiftRel R ca cb` is a generalization of `Equiv` to relations other than
equality. It asserts that if `ca` terminates with `a`, then `cb` terminates with
some `b` such that `R a b`, and if `cb` terminates with `b` then `ca` terminates
with some `a` such that `R a b`. -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) : Prop :=
(∀ {a}, a ∈ ca → ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b) ∧ ∀ {b}, b ∈ cb → ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel (swap R) cb ca ↔ LiftRel R ca cb :=
@and_comm _ _
theorem lift_eq_iff_equiv (c₁ c₂ : Computation α) : LiftRel (· = ·) c₁ c₂ ↔ c₁ ~ c₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ a =>
⟨fun a1 => by let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := h1 a1; rwa [ab],
fun a2 => by let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := h2 a2; rwa [← ab]⟩,
fun e => ⟨fun {a} a1 => ⟨a, (e _).1 a1, rfl⟩, fun {a} a2 => ⟨a, (e _).2 a2, rfl⟩⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun _ =>
⟨fun {a} as => ⟨a, as, H a⟩, fun {b} bs => ⟨b, bs, H b⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a2 =>
let ⟨b, b1, ab⟩ := r a2
⟨b, b1, H ab⟩,
fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨b, b2, ab⟩ := l a1
⟨b, b2, H ab⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun _ _ _ ⟨l1, r1⟩ ⟨l2, r2⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} a1 =>
let ⟨_, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1
let ⟨c, c3, bc⟩ := l2 b2
⟨c, c3, H ab bc⟩,
fun {_} c3 =>
let ⟨_, b2, bc⟩ := r2 c3
let ⟨a, a1, ab⟩ := r1 b2
⟨a, a1, H ab bc⟩⟩
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @LiftRel.symm _ R @symm, @LiftRel.trans _ R @trans⟩
theorem LiftRel.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) (s t) :
LiftRel R s t → LiftRel S s t
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} as =>
let ⟨b, bt, ab⟩ := l as
⟨b, bt, H ab⟩,
fun {_} bt =>
let ⟨a, as, ab⟩ := r bt
⟨a, as, H ab⟩⟩
theorem terminates_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} :
LiftRel R s t → (Terminates s ↔ Terminates t)
| ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, as⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨b, bt, _⟩ := l as
⟨⟨b, bt⟩⟩,
fun ⟨⟨_, bt⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨a, as, _⟩ := r bt
⟨⟨a, as⟩⟩⟩
theorem rel_of_liftRel {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
LiftRel R ca cb → ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b
| ⟨l, _⟩, a, b, ma, mb => by
let ⟨b', mb', ab'⟩ := l ma
rw [mem_unique mb mb']; exact ab'
theorem liftRel_of_mem {R : α → β → Prop} {a b ca cb} (ma : a ∈ ca) (mb : b ∈ cb) (ab : R a b) :
LiftRel R ca cb :=
⟨fun {a'} ma' => by rw [mem_unique ma' ma]; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩, fun {b'} mb' => by
rw [mem_unique mb' mb]; exact ⟨a, ma, ab⟩⟩
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (H : LiftRel R ca cb) {a} (h : a ∈ ca) :
∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
H.left h
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (H : LiftRel R ca cb) {b} (h : b ∈ cb) :
∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
H.right h
theorem liftRel_def {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} :
LiftRel R ca cb ↔ (Terminates ca ↔ Terminates cb) ∧ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ ca → b ∈ cb → R a b :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨terminates_of_liftRel h, fun {a b} ma mb => by
let ⟨b', mb', ab⟩ := h.left ma
rwa [mem_unique mb mb']⟩,
fun ⟨l, r⟩ =>
⟨fun {_} ma =>
let ⟨⟨b, mb⟩⟩ := l.1 ⟨⟨_, ma⟩⟩
⟨b, mb, r ma mb⟩,
fun {_} mb =>
let ⟨⟨a, ma⟩⟩ := l.2 ⟨⟨_, mb⟩⟩
⟨a, ma, r ma mb⟩⟩⟩
theorem liftRel_bind {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : Computation α}
{s2 : Computation β} {f1 : α → Computation γ} {f2 : β → Computation δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2)
(h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → LiftRel S (f1 a) (f2 b)) : LiftRel S (bind s1 f1) (bind s2 f2) :=
let ⟨l1, r1⟩ := h1
⟨fun {_} cB =>
let ⟨_, a1, c₁⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind cB
let ⟨_, b2, ab⟩ := l1 a1
let ⟨l2, _⟩ := h2 ab
let ⟨_, d2, cd⟩ := l2 c₁
⟨_, mem_bind b2 d2, cd⟩,
fun {_} dB =>
let ⟨_, b1, d1⟩ := exists_of_mem_bind dB
let ⟨_, a2, ab⟩ := r1 b1
let ⟨_, r2⟩ := h2 ab
let ⟨_, c₂, cd⟩ := r2 d1
⟨_, mem_bind a2 c₂, cd⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_pure_left (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R (pure a) cb ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
⟨fun ⟨l, _⟩ => l (ret_mem _), fun ⟨b, mb, ab⟩ =>
⟨fun {a'} ma' => by rw [eq_of_pure_mem ma']; exact ⟨b, mb, ab⟩, fun {b'} mb' =>
⟨_, ret_mem _, by rw [mem_unique mb' mb]; exact ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_pure_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (b : β) :
LiftRel R ca (pure b) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b := by rw [LiftRel.swap, liftRel_pure_left]
theorem liftRel_pure (R : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
LiftRel R (pure a) (pure b) ↔ R a b := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R (think ca) cb ↔ LiftRel R ca cb :=
and_congr (forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ Iff.rfl)
(forall_congr' fun _ =>
imp_congr Iff.rfl <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ Iff.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (ca : Computation α) (cb : Computation β) :
LiftRel R ca (think cb) ↔ LiftRel R ca cb := by
rw [← LiftRel.swap R, ← LiftRel.swap R]; apply liftRel_think_left
theorem liftRel_mem_cases {R : α → β → Prop} {ca cb} (Ha : ∀ a ∈ ca, LiftRel R ca cb)
(Hb : ∀ b ∈ cb, LiftRel R ca cb) : LiftRel R ca cb :=
⟨fun {_} ma => (Ha _ ma).left ma, fun {_} mb => (Hb _ mb).right mb⟩
theorem liftRel_congr {R : α → β → Prop} {ca ca' : Computation α} {cb cb' : Computation β}
(ha : ca ~ ca') (hb : cb ~ cb') : LiftRel R ca cb ↔ LiftRel R ca' cb' :=
and_congr
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr (ha _) <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr (hb _) Iff.rfl)
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr (hb _) <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr (ha _) Iff.rfl)
theorem liftRel_map {δ} (R : α → β → Prop) (S : γ → δ → Prop) {s1 : Computation α}
{s2 : Computation β} {f1 : α → γ} {f2 : β → δ} (h1 : LiftRel R s1 s2)
(h2 : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S (f1 a) (f2 b)) : LiftRel S (map f1 s1) (map f2 s2) := by
rw [← bind_pure, ← bind_pure]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h1; simpa
theorem map_congr {s1 s2 : Computation α} {f : α → β}
(h1 : s1 ~ s2) : map f s1 ~ map f s2 := by
rw [← lift_eq_iff_equiv]
exact liftRel_map Eq _ ((lift_eq_iff_equiv _ _).2 h1) fun {a} b => congr_arg _
/-- Alternate definition of `LiftRel` over relations between `Computation`s -/
def LiftRelAux (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) :
α ⊕ (Computation α) → β ⊕ (Computation β) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl b => R a b
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inr cb => ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b
| Sum.inr ca, Sum.inl b => ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b
| Sum.inr ca, Sum.inr cb => C ca cb
variable {R : α → β → Prop} {C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop}
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inl_inl {a : α} {b : β} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inl b) = R a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inl_inr {a : α} {cb} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inr cb) = ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inr_inl {b : β} {ca} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inr ca) (Sum.inl b) = ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma liftRelAux_inr_inr {ca cb} :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inr ca) (Sum.inr cb) = C ca cb :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LiftRelAux.ret_left (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) (a cb) :
LiftRelAux R C (Sum.inl a) (destruct cb) ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ cb ∧ R a b := by
apply cb.recOn (fun b => _) fun cb => _
· intro b
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨_, ret_mem _, h⟩, fun ⟨b', mb, h⟩ => by rw [mem_unique (ret_mem _) mb]; exact h⟩
· intro
rw [destruct_think]
exact ⟨fun ⟨b, h, r⟩ => ⟨b, think_mem h, r⟩, fun ⟨b, h, r⟩ => ⟨b, of_think_mem h, r⟩⟩
theorem LiftRelAux.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) (a b) :
LiftRelAux (swap R) (swap C) b a = LiftRelAux R C a b := by
rcases a with a | ca <;> rcases b with b | cb <;> simp only [LiftRelAux]
@[simp]
theorem LiftRelAux.ret_right (R : α → β → Prop) (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop) (b ca) :
LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (Sum.inl b) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ ca ∧ R a b := by
rw [← LiftRelAux.swap, LiftRelAux.ret_left]
theorem LiftRelRec.lem {R : α → β → Prop} (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb)) (ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) (a)
(ha : a ∈ ca) : LiftRel R ca cb := by
revert cb
refine memRecOn (C := (fun ca ↦ ∀ (cb : Computation β), C ca cb → LiftRel R ca cb))
ha ?_ (fun ca' IH => ?_) <;> intro cb Hc <;> have h := H Hc
· simp only [destruct_pure, LiftRelAux.ret_left] at h
simp [h]
· simp only [liftRel_think_left]
revert h
apply cb.recOn (fun b => _) fun cb' => _ <;> intros _ h
· simpa using h
· simpa [h] using IH _ h
theorem liftRel_rec {R : α → β → Prop} (C : Computation α → Computation β → Prop)
(H : ∀ {ca cb}, C ca cb → LiftRelAux R C (destruct ca) (destruct cb)) (ca cb) (Hc : C ca cb) :
LiftRel R ca cb :=
liftRel_mem_cases (LiftRelRec.lem C (@H) ca cb Hc) fun b hb =>
(LiftRel.swap _ _ _).2 <|
LiftRelRec.lem (swap C) (fun {_ _} h => cast (LiftRelAux.swap _ _ _ _).symm <| H h) cb ca Hc b
hb
end Computation
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 1,155 | 1,159 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Notations
/-!
# Construction of homotopies for the Dold-Kan correspondence
(The general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan correspondence is explained
in `Equivalence.lean`.)
The purpose of the files `Homotopies.lean`, `Faces.lean`, `Projections.lean`
and `PInfty.lean` is to construct an idempotent endomorphism
`PInfty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` of the alternating face map complex
for each `X : SimplicialObject C` when `C` is a preadditive category.
In the case `C` is abelian, this `PInfty` shall be the projection on the
normalized Moore subcomplex of `K[X]` associated to the decomposition of the
complex `K[X]` as a direct sum of this normalized subcomplex and of the
degenerate subcomplex.
In `PInfty.lean`, this endomorphism `PInfty` shall be obtained by
passing to the limit idempotent endomorphisms `P q` for all `(q : ℕ)`.
These endomorphisms `P q` are defined by induction. The idea is to
start from the identity endomorphism `P 0` of `K[X]` and to ensure by
induction that the `q` higher face maps (except $d_0$) vanish on the
image of `P q`. Then, in a certain degree `n`, the image of `P q` for
a big enough `q` will be contained in the normalized subcomplex. This
construction is done in `Projections.lean`.
It would be easy to define the `P q` degreewise (similarly as it is done
in *Simplicial Homotopy Theory* by Goerrs-Jardine p. 149), but then we would
have to prove that they are compatible with the differential (i.e. they
are chain complex maps), and also that they are homotopic to the identity.
These two verifications are quite technical. In order to reduce the number
of such technical lemmas, the strategy that is followed here is to define
a series of null homotopic maps `Hσ q` (attached to families of maps `hσ`)
and use these in order to construct `P q` : the endomorphisms `P q`
shall basically be obtained by altering the identity endomorphism by adding
null homotopic maps, so that we get for free that they are morphisms
of chain complexes and that they are homotopic to the identity. The most
technical verifications that are needed about the null homotopic maps `Hσ`
are obtained in `Faces.lean`.
In this file `Homotopies.lean`, we define the null homotopic maps
`Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]`, show that they are natural (see `natTransHσ`) and
compatible the application of additive functors (see `map_Hσ`).
## References
* [Albrecht Dold, *Homology of Symmetric Products and Other Functors of Complexes*][dold1958]
* [Paul G. Goerss, John F. Jardine, *Simplicial Homotopy Theory*][goerss-jardine-2009]
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject Homotopy Opposite Simplicial DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable {X : SimplicialObject C}
/-- As we are using chain complexes indexed by `ℕ`, we shall need the relation
`c` such `c m n` if and only if `n+1=m`. -/
abbrev c :=
ComplexShape.down ℕ
/-- Helper when we need some `c.rel i j` (i.e. `ComplexShape.down ℕ`),
e.g. `c_mk n (n+1) rfl` -/
theorem c_mk (i j : ℕ) (h : j + 1 = i) : c.Rel i j :=
ComplexShape.down_mk i j h
/-- This lemma is meant to be used with `nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left` -/
theorem cs_down_0_not_rel_left (j : ℕ) : ¬c.Rel 0 j := by
intro hj
dsimp at hj
apply Nat.not_succ_le_zero j
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, hj]
/-- The sequence of maps which gives the null homotopic maps `Hσ` that shall be in
the inductive construction of the projections `P q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` -/
def hσ (q : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌ :=
if n < q then 0 else (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n - q) • X.σ ⟨n - q, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le _ _)⟩
/-- We can turn `hσ` into a datum that can be passed to `nullHomotopicMap'`. -/
def hσ' (q : ℕ) : ∀ n m, c.Rel m n → (K[X].X n ⟶ K[X].X m) := fun n m hnm =>
hσ q n ≫ eqToHom (by congr)
theorem hσ'_eq_zero {q n m : ℕ} (hnq : n < q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) = 0 := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
exact zero_comp
theorem hσ'_eq {q n a m : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) =
((-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩) ≫
eqToHom (by congr) := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
· omega
· have h' := tsub_eq_of_eq_add ha
congr
theorem hσ'_eq' {q n a : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) :
(hσ' q n (n + 1) rfl : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌) =
(-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩ := by
rw [hσ'_eq ha rfl, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
/-- The null homotopic map $(hσ q) ∘ d + d ∘ (hσ q)$ -/
def Hσ (q : ℕ) : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
nullHomotopicMap' (hσ' q)
/-- `Hσ` is null homotopic -/
def homotopyHσToZero (q : ℕ) : Homotopy (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]) 0 :=
nullHomotopy' (hσ' q)
/-- In degree `0`, the null homotopic map `Hσ` is zero. -/
theorem Hσ_eq_zero (q : ℕ) : (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]).f 0 = 0 := by
unfold Hσ
rw [nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left (c_mk 1 0 rfl) cs_down_0_not_rel_left]
rcases q with (_|q)
· rw [hσ'_eq (show 0 = 0 + 0 by rfl) (c_mk 1 0 rfl)]
simp only [pow_zero, Fin.mk_zero, one_zsmul, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
-- This `erw` is needed to show `0 + 1 = 1`.
erw [ChainComplex.of_d]
rw [AlternatingFaceMapComplex.objD, Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, pow_zero,
pow_one, one_smul, neg_smul, one_smul, comp_add, comp_neg, add_neg_eq_zero,
← Fin.castSucc_zero, ← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, δ_comp_σ_self, δ_comp_σ_succ]
· rw [hσ'_eq_zero (Nat.succ_pos q) (c_mk 1 0 rfl), zero_comp]
/-- The maps `hσ' q n m hnm` are natural on the simplicial object -/
theorem hσ'_naturality (q : ℕ) (n m : ℕ) (hnm : c.Rel m n) {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op ⦋n⦌) ≫ hσ' q n m hnm = hσ' q n m hnm ≫ f.app (op ⦋m⦌) := by
have h : n + 1 = m := hnm
subst h
simp only [hσ', eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
unfold hσ
split_ifs
· rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]
· simp
/-- For each q, `Hσ q` is a natural transformation. -/
def natTransHσ (q : ℕ) : alternatingFaceMapComplex C ⟶ alternatingFaceMapComplex C where
app _ := Hσ q
naturality _ _ f := by
unfold Hσ
| rw [nullHomotopicMap'_comp, comp_nullHomotopicMap']
congr
ext n m hnm
simp only [alternatingFaceMapComplex_map_f, hσ'_naturality]
/-- The maps `hσ' q n m hnm` are compatible with the application of additive functors. -/
theorem map_hσ' {D : Type*} [Category D] [Preadditive D] (G : C ⥤ D) [G.Additive]
(X : SimplicialObject C) (q n m : ℕ) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : K[((whiskering _ _).obj G).obj X].X n ⟶ _) =
G.map (hσ' q n m hnm : K[X].X n ⟶ _) := by
unfold hσ' hσ
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Homotopies.lean | 156 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
| theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 115 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,220 | 1,221 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open scoped Matrix
open Module TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
variable (M) in
open Classical in
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
classical
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindexFinsetRange, ← traceAux_def, ← traceAux_def,
traceAux_eq R b b.reindexFinsetRange]
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) := by
classical
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, LinearMap.toMatrix_mul]
apply Matrix.trace_mul_comm
· rw [trace, dif_neg H, LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
lemma trace_mul_cycle (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g * h) = trace R M (h * f * g) := by
rw [LinearMap.trace_mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
lemma trace_mul_cycle' (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * (g * h)) = trace R M (h * (f * g)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, LinearMap.trace_mul_comm]
/-- The trace of an endomorphism is invariant under conjugation -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g := by
rw [trace_mul_comm]
simp
@[simp]
lemma trace_lie {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f g : Module.End R M) :
trace R M ⁅f, g⁆ = 0 := by
rw [Ring.lie_def, map_sub, trace_mul_comm]
exact sub_self _
end
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (N P : Type*) [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M` -/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
apply Basis.ext (Basis.tensorProduct (Basis.dualBasis b) b)
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Basis.tensorProduct_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp]
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_dualTensorHom]
by_cases hij : i = j
· rw [hij]
simp
rw [Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero j i (1 : R) hij]
simp [Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij]
/-- The trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis' [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm.toLinearMap := by
simp [LinearEquiv.eq_comp_toLinearMap_symm, trace_eq_contract_of_basis b]
section
variable (R M)
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R N] [Module.Finite R N]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract : LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract_apply (x : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M) :
(LinearMap.trace R M) ((dualTensorHom R M M) x) = contractLeft R M x := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_eq_contract]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
theorem trace_eq_contract' :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).symm.toLinearMap :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis' (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_one : trace R M 1 = (finrank R M : R) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
have b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_one, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
simp
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_id : trace R M id = (finrank R M : R) := by rw [← Module.End.one_eq_id, trace_one]
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose : trace R (Module.Dual R M) ∘ₗ Module.Dual.transpose = trace R M := by
let e := dualTensorHomEquiv R M M
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext f m; simp [e]
theorem trace_prodMap :
trace R (M × N) ∘ₗ prodMapLinear R M N M N R =
(coprod id id : R × R →ₗ[R] R) ∘ₗ prodMap (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
let e := (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).prodCongr (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N)
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext
· simp only [dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prodCongr,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, restrictScalars_comp,
curry_apply, coe_comp, coe_restrictScalars, coe_inl, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply,
map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, coe_fst, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, add_zero, e]
· simp only [dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prodCongr,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, restrictScalars_comp,
curry_apply, coe_comp, coe_restrictScalars, coe_inr, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply,
map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, coe_snd, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, zero_add, e]
variable {R M N P}
theorem trace_prodMap' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M × N) (prodMap f g) = trace R M f + trace R N g := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_prodMap R M N) (f, g)
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id,
prodMapLinear_apply] at h
exact h
variable (R M N P)
open TensorProduct Function
theorem trace_tensorProduct : compr₂ (mapBilinear R M N M N) (trace R (M ⊗ N)) =
compl₁₂ (lsmul R R : R →ₗ[R] R →ₗ[R] R) (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N).surjective)).1
ext f m g n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, toFun_eq_coe, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contractLeft_apply, lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
map_dualTensorHom, dualDistrib_apply]
theorem trace_comp_comm :
compr₂ (llcomp R M N M) (trace R M) = compr₂ (llcomp R N M N).flip (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M N).surjective)).1
ext g m f n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, flip_apply, llcomp_apply',
comp_dualTensorHom, LinearMapClass.map_smul, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R _ (Module.Dual.transpose (R := R) f) = trace R M f := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_transpose]
theorem trace_tensorProduct' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M ⊗ N) (map f g) = trace R M f * trace R N g := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_tensorProduct R M N) f) g
simp only [compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply, compl₁₂_apply, lsmul_apply,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] at h
exact h
theorem trace_comp_comm' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (g ∘ₗ f) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ g) := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_comp_comm R M N) g) f
simp only [llcomp_apply', compr₂_apply, flip_apply] at h
exact h
end
variable {N P}
variable [Module.Free R N] [Module.Finite R N] [Module.Free R P] [Module.Finite R P] in
lemma trace_comp_cycle (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P (g ∘ₗ f ∘ₗ h) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ h ∘ₗ g) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', comp_assoc]
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R P] [Module.Finite R P] in
lemma trace_comp_cycle' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P ((g ∘ₗ f) ∘ₗ h) = trace R M ((h ∘ₗ g) ∘ₗ f) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : trace R N (e.conj f) = trace R M f := by
classical
by_cases hM : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := hM
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis b
haveI := (Module.free_def R M).mpr ⟨_, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis (b.map e)
haveI := (Module.free_def R N).mpr ⟨_, ⟨(b.map e).reindex (e.toEquiv.image _)⟩⟩
rw [e.conj_apply, trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc, LinearEquiv.comp_coe,
LinearEquiv.self_trans_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap, id_comp]
· rw [trace, trace, dif_neg hM, dif_neg ?_, zero_apply, zero_apply]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact hM ⟨s.image e.symm, ⟨(b.map e.symm).reindex
((e.symm.toEquiv.image s).trans (Equiv.setCongr Finset.coe_image.symm))⟩⟩
theorem IsProj.trace {p : Submodule R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : IsProj p f) [Module.Free R p]
[Module.Finite R p] [Module.Free R (ker f)] [Module.Finite R (ker f)] :
trace R M f = (finrank R p : R) := by
rw [h.eq_conj_prodMap, trace_conj', trace_prodMap', trace_id, map_zero, add_zero]
lemma isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent {f : M →ₗ[R] M} (hf : IsNilpotent f) :
IsNilpotent (trace R M f) := by
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
swap
· rw [LinearMap.trace, dif_neg H]
exact IsNilpotent.zero
obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
classical
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b]
apply Matrix.isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent
simpa
lemma trace_comp_eq_mul_of_commute_of_isNilpotent [IsReduced R] {f g : Module.End R M}
(μ : R) (h_comm : Commute f g) (hg : IsNilpotent (g - algebraMap R _ μ)) :
trace R M (f ∘ₗ g) = μ * trace R M f := by
set n := g - algebraMap R _ μ
replace hg : trace R M (f ∘ₗ n) = 0 := by
rw [← isNilpotent_iff_eq_zero, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
refine isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent (Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right ?_ hg)
exact h_comm.sub_right (Algebra.commute_algebraMap_right μ f)
have hμ : g = algebraMap R _ μ + n := eq_add_of_sub_eq' rfl
have : f ∘ₗ algebraMap R _ μ = μ • f := by ext; simp -- TODO Surely exists?
| rw [hμ, comp_add, map_add, hg, add_zero, this, LinearMap.map_smul, smul_eq_mul]
-- This result requires `Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free`. Maybe it should move elsewhere?
@[simp]
lemma trace_baseChange [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(f : M →ₗ[R] M) (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 316 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
| @[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 89 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 1,034 | 1,035 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kenny Lau, Kim Morrison, Alex Keizer
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
/-!
# Lists of elements of `Fin n`
This file develops some results on `finRange n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
theorem finRange_eq_pmap_range (n : ℕ) : finRange n = (range n).pmap Fin.mk (by simp) := by
apply List.ext_getElem <;> simp [finRange]
@[simp]
theorem mem_finRange {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) : a ∈ finRange n := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact mem_pmap.2
⟨a.1, mem_range.2 a.2, by
cases a
rfl⟩
theorem nodup_finRange (n : ℕ) : (finRange n).Nodup := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact (Pairwise.pmap nodup_range _) fun _ _ _ _ => @Fin.ne_of_val_ne _ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩
@[simp]
theorem finRange_eq_nil {n : ℕ} : finRange n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero_iff, length_finRange]
theorem pairwise_lt_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (finRange n) := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact List.pairwise_lt_range.pmap (by simp) (by simp)
theorem pairwise_le_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (finRange n) := by
rw [finRange_eq_pmap_range]
exact List.pairwise_le_range.pmap (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma count_finRange {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) : count a (finRange n) = 1 := by
simp [count_eq_of_nodup (nodup_finRange n)]
theorem get_finRange {n : ℕ} {i : ℕ} (h) :
(finRange n).get ⟨i, h⟩ = ⟨i, length_finRange (n := n) ▸ h⟩ := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem finRange_map_get (l : List α) : (finRange l.length).map l.get = l :=
List.ext_get (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem finRange_map_getElem (l : List α) : (finRange l.length).map (l[·.1]) = l :=
finRange_map_get l
@[simp] theorem idxOf_finRange {k : ℕ} (i : Fin k) : (finRange k).idxOf i = i := by
simpa using idxOf_getElem (nodup_finRange k) i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_finRange := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_finRange (n : ℕ) : ((finRange n) : List (Fin n)).map (Fin.val) = List.range n := by
apply List.ext_getElem <;> simp
theorem finRange_succ_eq_map (n : ℕ) : finRange n.succ = 0 :: (finRange n).map Fin.succ := by
apply map_injective_iff.mpr Fin.val_injective
rw [map_cons, map_coe_finRange, range_succ_eq_map, Fin.val_zero, ← map_coe_finRange, map_map,
map_map]
simp only [Function.comp_def, Fin.val_succ]
theorem ofFn_eq_pmap {n} {f : Fin n → α} :
ofFn f = pmap (fun i hi => f ⟨i, hi⟩) (range n) fun _ => mem_range.1 := by
rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]
exact ext_getElem (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => by simp [List.getElem_ofFn hi1]
|
theorem ofFn_id (n) : ofFn id = finRange n :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/List/FinRange.lean | 87 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Constructors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Locally
/-!
# Properties of morphisms from properties of ring homs.
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms that come from properties
of ring homs. For `P` a property of ring homs, we have two ways of defining a property of scheme
morphisms:
Let `f : X ⟶ Y`,
- `targetAffineLocally (affineAnd P)`: the preimage of an affine open `U = Spec A` is affine
(`= Spec B`) and `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`. (in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/AffineAnd.lean`)
- `affineLocally P`: For each pair of affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ X` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`,
the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
For these notions to be well defined, we require `P` be a sufficient local property. For the former,
`P` should be local on the source (`RingHom.RespectsIso P`, `RingHom.LocalizationPreserves P`,
`RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan`), and `targetAffineLocally (affine_and P)` will be local on
the target.
For the latter `P` should be local on the target (`RingHom.PropertyIsLocal P`), and
`affineLocally P` will be local on both the source and the target.
We also provide the following interface:
## `HasRingHomProperty`
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q` on `Γ(f)`.
For `HasRingHomProperty P Q` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`:
`P f` if and only if `Q (f.appLE U V _)` for all affine `U : Opens Y` and `V : Opens X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_source_openCover`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop)` for an affine open cover `𝒰` of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_isAffine`:
If `X` and `Y` are affine, then `P f ↔ Q (f.appTop)`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.Spec_iff`:
`P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
If `Y` is affine, `P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i) _)` for a family `U` of affine opens of `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.of_isOpenImmersion`:
If `f` is an open immersion then `P f`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasRingHomProperty.isStableUnderBaseChange`:
If `Q` is stable under base change, then so is `P`.
We also provide the instances `P.IsMultiplicative`, `P.IsStableUnderComposition`,
`IsLocalAtTarget P`, `IsLocalAtSource P`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
universe u
open CategoryTheory Opposite TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace RingHom
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
theorem IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
(hP : IsStableUnderBaseChange P) (hP' : RespectsIso P)
{X Y S : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] [IsAffine S] (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S)
(H : P g.appTop.hom) : P (pullback.fst f g).appTop.hom := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): change `rw` to `erw`
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst AffineScheme.forgetToScheme (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g)]
rw [Scheme.comp_appTop, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map]
have := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.unop
(PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst AffineScheme.Γ.rightOp (AffineScheme.ofHom f)
(AffineScheme.ofHom g))
simp only [AffineScheme.Γ, Functor.rightOp_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, unop_comp,
AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_obj, Scheme.Γ_obj, Functor.rightOp_map, Functor.comp_map,
Functor.op_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, AffineScheme.forgetToScheme_map, Scheme.Γ_map] at this
rw [← this, CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso, ← pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, hP'.cancel_right_isIso]
exact hP.pushout_inl _ hP' _ _ H
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")]
alias IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_app_top :=
IsStableUnderBaseChange.pullback_fst_appTop
end RingHom
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
section affineLocally
variable (P : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `sourceAffineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`
whenever `P` holds for the restriction of `f` on every affine open subset of `X`. -/
def sourceAffineLocally : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ f _ =>
∀ U : X.affineOpens, P (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top).hom
/-- For `P` a property of ring homomorphisms, `affineLocally P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y` if for each
affine open `U = Spec A ⊆ Y` and `V = Spec B ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`, the ring hom `A ⟶ B` satisfies `P`.
Also see `affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le`. -/
abbrev affineLocally : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u} :=
targetAffineLocally (sourceAffineLocally P)
theorem sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).toProperty.RespectsIso := by
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
· introv H U
have : IsIso (e.hom.appLE (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (e.hom.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ ⊤ (e.hom ''ᵁ U) U.1 le_top (e.hom.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H ⟨_, U.prop.image_of_isOpenImmersion e.hom⟩
· introv H U
rw [Scheme.comp_appLE, CommRingCat.hom_comp, h₁.cancel_left_isIso]
exact H U
theorem affineLocally_respectsIso (h : RingHom.RespectsIso P) : (affineLocally P).RespectsIso :=
letI := sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h
inferInstance
open Scheme in
theorem sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(U : Y.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
@sourceAffineLocally P _ _ (f ∣_ U) hU ↔
∀ (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U), P (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
dsimp only [sourceAffineLocally]
simp only [morphismRestrict_appLE]
rw [(affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).forall_congr_left, Subtype.forall]
refine forall₂_congr fun V h ↦ ?_
have := (affineOpensRestrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)).apply_symm_apply ⟨V, h⟩
exact f.appLE_congr _ (Opens.ι_image_top _) congr($(this).1.1) (fun f => P f.hom)
theorem affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
affineLocally.{u} P f ↔
∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e : V.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U.1), P (f.appLE U V e).hom :=
forall_congr' fun U ↦ sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict P f U U.2
theorem sourceAffineLocally_isLocal (h₁ : RingHom.RespectsIso P)
(h₂ : RingHom.LocalizationAwayPreserves P) (h₃ : RingHom.OfLocalizationSpan P) :
(sourceAffineLocally P).IsLocal := by
constructor
· exact sourceAffineLocally_respectsIso P h₁
· intro X Y _ f r H
rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict]
intro U hU
have : X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U (by simp) r) = U := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, Opens.map_top, CommRingCat.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp,
Function.comp_apply]
rw [Scheme.basicOpen_res]
simpa using hU
rw [← f.appLE_congr _ rfl this (fun f => P f.hom),
IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2 _ r]
simp only [CommRingCat.hom_ofHom]
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) h₂
exact H U
· introv hs hs' U
apply h₃ _ _ hs
intro r
simp_rw [sourceAffineLocally_morphismRestrict] at hs'
have := hs' r ⟨X.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1), U.2.basicOpen (f.appLE ⊤ U le_top r.1)⟩
(by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE])
rwa [IsAffineOpen.appLE_eq_away_map f (isAffineOpen_top Y) U.2, CommRingCat.hom_ofHom,
← h₁.isLocalization_away_iff] at this
variable {P}
lemma affineLocally_le {Q : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(hPQ : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}, P f → Q f) :
affineLocally P ≤ affineLocally Q :=
fun _ _ _ hf U V ↦ hPQ (hf U V)
open RingHom
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open affine neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f`
over some basic open of `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.affineOpens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.affineOpens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁.1) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (r : Γ(Y, U₁)) (s : Γ(X, V₁)) (_ : x ∈ X.basicOpen s)
(e : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r),
P (f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r) (X.basicOpen s) e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, r', hBrr', hBfx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter U₁.2 U₂.2 (f.base x)
⟨hfx₁, e₂ hx₂⟩
have ha : IsAffineOpen (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) := V₂.2.basicOpen _
have hxa : x ∈ X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r') := by
simpa [Scheme.Hom.appLE, ← Scheme.preimage_basicOpen] using And.intro hx₂ (hBrr' ▸ hBfx)
obtain ⟨s, s', hBss', hBx⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_affine_inter V₁.2 ha x ⟨hx₁, hxa⟩
haveI := V₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')
haveI := U₂.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r'
haveI := ha.isLocalization_basicOpen s'
have ers : X.basicOpen s ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ Y.basicOpen r := by
rw [hBss', hBrr']
apply le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _)
simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]
have heq : f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen s') (hBrr' ▸ hBss' ▸ ers) =
f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r') (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂ r')) (by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]) ≫
CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _) := by
simp only [Scheme.Hom.appLE, homOfLE_leOfHom, CommRingCat.comp_apply, Category.assoc]
congr
apply X.presheaf.map_comp
refine ⟨r, s, hBx, ers, ?_⟩
· rw [f.appLE_congr _ hBrr' hBss' (fun f => P f.hom), heq]
apply hPa _ s' _
rw [U₂.2.appLE_eq_away_map f V₂.2]
exact hPl _ _ _ _ h₂
/-- If `P` holds for `f` over affine opens `U₂` of `Y` and `V₂` of `X` and `U₁` (resp. `V₁`) are
open neighborhoods of `x` (resp. `f.base x`), then `P` also holds for `f` over some affine open
`U'` of `Y` (resp. `V'` of `X`) that is contained in `U₁` (resp. `V₁`). -/
lemma exists_affineOpens_le_appLE_of_appLE
(hPa : StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget P) (hPl : LocalizationAwayPreserves P)
(x : X) (U₁ : Y.Opens) (U₂ : Y.affineOpens) (V₁ : X.Opens) (V₂ : X.affineOpens)
(hx₁ : x ∈ V₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ V₂.1) (e₂ : V₂.1 ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U₂.1) (h₂ : P (f.appLE U₂ V₂ e₂).hom)
(hfx₁ : f.base x ∈ U₁.1) :
∃ (U' : Y.affineOpens) (V' : X.affineOpens) (_ : U'.1 ≤ U₁) (_ : V'.1 ≤ V₁) (_ : x ∈ V'.1)
(e : V'.1 ≤ f⁻¹ᵁ U'.1), P (f.appLE U' V' e).hom := by
obtain ⟨r, hBr, hBfx⟩ := U₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨f.base x, hfx₁⟩ (e₂ hx₂)
obtain ⟨s, hBs, hBx⟩ := V₂.2.exists_basicOpen_le ⟨x, hx₁⟩ hx₂
obtain ⟨r', s', hBx', e', hf'⟩ := exists_basicOpen_le_appLE_of_appLE_of_isAffine hPa hPl x
⟨Y.basicOpen r, U₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ U₂ ⟨X.basicOpen s, V₂.2.basicOpen _⟩ V₂ hBx hx₂ e₂ h₂ hBfx
exact ⟨⟨Y.basicOpen r', (U₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩,
⟨X.basicOpen s', (V₂.2.basicOpen _).basicOpen _⟩, le_trans (Y.basicOpen_le _) hBr,
le_trans (X.basicOpen_le _) hBs, hBx', e', hf'⟩
end affineLocally
/--
`HasRingHomProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target and the source,
and for `f : Spec B ⟶ Spec A`, it is equivalent to the ring hom property `Q`.
To make the proofs easier, we state it instead as
1. `Q` is local (See `RingHom.PropertyIsLocal`)
2. `P f` if and only if `Q` holds for every `Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, V)` for all affine `U`, `V`.
See `HasRingHomProperty.iff_appLE`.
-/
class HasRingHomProperty (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u})
(Q : outParam (∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop)) : Prop where
isLocal_ringHomProperty : RingHom.PropertyIsLocal Q
eq_affineLocally' : P = affineLocally Q
namespace HasRingHomProperty
variable (P : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}) {Q} [HasRingHomProperty P Q]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
lemma copy {P' : MorphismProperty Scheme.{u}}
{Q' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S], (R →+* S) → Prop}
(e : P = P') (e' : ∀ {R S : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S), Q f ↔ Q' f) :
HasRingHomProperty P' Q' := by
subst e
have heq : @Q = @Q' := by
ext R S _ _ f
exact (e' f)
rw [← heq]
infer_instance
lemma eq_affineLocally : P = affineLocally Q := eq_affineLocally'
@[local instance]
lemma HasAffineProperty : HasAffineProperty P (sourceAffineLocally Q) where
isLocal_affineProperty := sourceAffineLocally_isLocal _
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).localizationAwayPreserves
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpan
eq_targetAffineLocally' := eq_affineLocally P
/- This is only `inferInstance` because of the `@[local instance]` on `HasAffineProperty` above. -/
instance (priority := 900) : IsLocalAtTarget P := inferInstance
theorem appLE (H : P f) (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e) : Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H
exact H _ _ _
theorem appTop (H : P f) [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] : Q f.appTop.hom := by
rw [Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE]
exact appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias app_top := appTop
include Q in
theorem comp_of_isOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion f] (H : P g) :
P (f ≫ g) := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le] at H ⊢
intro U V e
have : IsIso (f.appLE (f ''ᵁ V) V.1 (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsIso (f.app _ ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (f.preimage_image_eq _).symm).op))
rw [← Scheme.appLE_comp_appLE _ _ _ (f ''ᵁ V) V.1
(Set.image_subset_iff.mpr e) (f.preimage_image_eq _).ge,
CommRingCat.hom_comp,
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso]
exact H _ ⟨_, V.2.image_of_isOpenImmersion _⟩ _
variable {P f}
lemma iff_appLE : P f ↔ ∀ (U : Y.affineOpens) (V : X.affineOpens) (e), Q (f.appLE U V e).hom := by
rw [eq_affineLocally P, affineLocally_iff_affineOpens_le]
theorem of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y]
(𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (H : ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop.hom)) :
P f := by
rw [HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P)]
intro U
let S i : X.affineOpens := ⟨_, isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝒰.map i)⟩
induction U using of_affine_open_cover S 𝒰.iSup_opensRange with
| basicOpen U r H =>
simp_rw [Scheme.affineBasicOpen_coe,
← f.appLE_map (U := ⊤) le_top (homOfLE (X.basicOpen_le r)).op]
have := U.2.isLocalization_basicOpen r
exact (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwayTarget _ r _ H
| openCover U s hs H =>
apply (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).ofLocalizationSpanTarget.ofIsLocalization
(isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso _ _ hs
rintro r
refine ⟨_, _, _, IsAffineOpen.isLocalization_basicOpen U.2 r, ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map]
exact H r
| hU i =>
specialize H i
rw [← (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso.cancel_right_isIso _
((IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (𝒰.map i) (S i).1.ι
Subtype.range_coe.symm).inv.app _), ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, ← Scheme.comp_appTop,
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac_assoc, Scheme.comp_appTop,
Scheme.Opens.ι_appTop, Scheme.Hom.appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map] at H
exact (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp H
theorem iff_of_source_openCover [IsAffine Y] (𝒰 : X.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q ((𝒰.map i ≫ f).appTop).hom :=
⟨fun H i ↦ appTop P _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion P (𝒰.map i) f H), of_source_openCover 𝒰⟩
theorem iff_of_isAffine [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] :
P f ↔ Q (f.appTop).hom := by
rw [iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (Scheme.coverOfIsIso.{u} (𝟙 _))]
simp
theorem Spec_iff {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} {φ : R ⟶ S} :
P (Spec.map φ) ↔ Q φ.hom := by
have H := (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P), ← H.cancel_right_isIso _ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).hom,
← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_naturality, CommRingCat.hom_comp, H.cancel_left_isIso]
theorem of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤)
(H : ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom) :
P f := by
have (i) : IsAffine ((X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU).obj i) := (U i).2
refine of_source_openCover (X.openCoverOfISupEqTop _ hU) fun i ↦ ?_
simpa [Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE] using (f.appLE_congr _ rfl (by simp) (fun f => Q f.hom)).mp (H i)
theorem iff_of_iSup_eq_top [IsAffine Y] {ι : Type*}
(U : ι → X.affineOpens) (hU : ⨆ i, (U i : Opens X) = ⊤) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f.appLE ⊤ (U i).1 le_top).hom :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ appLE P f H ⟨_, isAffineOpen_top _⟩ _ le_top, of_iSup_eq_top U hU⟩
instance : IsLocalAtSource P := by
apply HasAffineProperty.isLocalAtSource
intros X Y f _ 𝒰
simp_rw [← HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P),
iff_of_source_openCover 𝒰.affineRefinement.openCover,
fun i ↦ iff_of_source_openCover (P := P) (f := 𝒰.map i ≫ f) (𝒰.obj i).affineCover]
simp [Scheme.OpenCover.affineRefinement, Sigma.forall]
lemma containsIdentities (hP : RingHom.ContainsIdentities Q) : P.ContainsIdentities where
id_mem X := by
rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro U
have : IsAffine (𝟙 X ⁻¹ᵁ U.1) := U.2
rw [morphismRestrict_id, iff_of_isAffine (P := P), Scheme.id_appTop]
apply hP
variable (P) in
open _root_.PrimeSpectrum in
lemma isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget
[IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtSource P] :
RingHom.PropertyIsLocal fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) := by
have hP : RingHom.RespectsIso (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) :=
RingHom.toMorphismProperty_respectsIso_iff.mpr
(inferInstanceAs (P.inverseImage Scheme.Spec).unop.RespectsIso)
constructor
· intro R S _ _ f r R' S' _ _ _ _ _ _ H
refine (RingHom.RespectsIso.isLocalization_away_iff hP ..).mp ?_
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) r)).mp (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict H (basicOpen r))
· intros R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtSource.of_openCover (Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop
(fun i : s ↦ (i : S)) (by simpa)).openCover
intro i
simp only [CommRingCat.coe_of, Set.setOf_mem_eq, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_obj, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_obj_carrier,
Scheme.AffineOpenCover.openCover_map, Scheme.affineOpenCoverOfSpanRangeEqTop_map,
← Spec.map_comp]
exact H i
· intro R S _ _ f s hs H
apply IsLocalAtTarget.of_iSup_eq_top _ (PrimeSpectrum.iSup_basicOpen_eq_top_iff
(f := fun i : s ↦ (i : R)).mpr (by simpa))
intro i
exact (MorphismProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff P (SpecMapRestrictBasicOpenIso
(CommRingCat.ofHom f) i.1)).mpr (H i)
· intro R S T _ _ _ _ r _ f hf
have := AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion.of_isLocalization (S := T) r
show P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f ≫ CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _)))
rw [Spec.map_comp]
exact IsLocalAtSource.comp hf ..
open _root_.PrimeSpectrum in
variable (P) in
lemma of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget [IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtSource P] :
HasRingHomProperty P (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) where
isLocal_ringHomProperty :=
isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget P
eq_affineLocally' := by
let Q := affineLocally (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f)))
have : HasRingHomProperty Q (fun f ↦ P (Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom f))) :=
⟨isLocal_ringHomProperty_of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget P, rfl⟩
show P = Q
ext X Y f
wlog hY : ∃ R, Y = Spec R generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover (P := P) Y.affineCover,
IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover (P := Q) Y.affineCover]
refine forall_congr' fun _ ↦ this _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨S, rfl⟩ := hY
wlog hX : ∃ R, X = Spec R generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) X.affineCover,
IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := Q) X.affineCover]
refine forall_congr' fun _ ↦ this _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨R, rfl⟩ := hX
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ : ∃ φ, Spec.map φ = f := ⟨_, Spec.map_preimage _⟩
rw [HasRingHomProperty.Spec_iff (P := Q)]
rfl
lemma stalkwise {P} (hP : RingHom.RespectsIso P) :
HasRingHomProperty (stalkwise P) fun {_ S _ _} φ ↦
∀ (p : Ideal S) (_ : p.IsPrime), P (Localization.localRingHom _ p φ rfl) := by
have := stalkwiseIsLocalAtTarget_of_respectsIso hP
have := stalkwise_isLocalAtSource_of_respectsIso hP
convert of_isLocalAtSource_of_isLocalAtTarget (P := AlgebraicGeometry.stalkwise P) with R S _ _ φ
exact (stalkwise_Spec_map_iff hP (CommRingCat.ofHom φ)).symm
lemma stableUnderComposition (hP : RingHom.StableUnderComposition Q) :
P.IsStableUnderComposition where
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg := by
wlog hZ : IsAffine Z generalizing X Y Z
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro U
rw [morphismRestrict_comp]
exact this _ _ (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hf _) (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hg _) U.2
wlog hY : IsAffine Y generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) (Y.affineCover.pullbackCover f)]
intro i
rw [← Scheme.Cover.pullbackHom_map_assoc]
exact this _ _ (IsLocalAtTarget.of_isPullback (.of_hasPullback _ _) hf)
(comp_of_isOpenImmersion _ _ _ hg) inferInstance
wlog hX : IsAffine X generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) X.affineCover]
intro i
rw [← Category.assoc]
exact this _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion _ _ _ hf) inferInstance
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at hf hg ⊢
exact hP _ _ hg hf
theorem of_comp
(H : ∀ {R S T : Type u} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing T],
∀ (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T), Q (g.comp f) → Q g)
{X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (h : P (f ≫ g)) : P f := by
wlog hZ : IsAffine Z generalizing X Y Z
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _
(g.preimage_iSup_eq_top (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top Z))]
intro U
have H := IsLocalAtTarget.restrict h U.1
rw [morphismRestrict_comp] at H
exact this H inferInstance
wlog hY : IsAffine Y generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top Y)]
intro U
have H := comp_of_isOpenImmersion P (f ⁻¹ᵁ U.1).ι (f ≫ g) h
rw [← morphismRestrict_ι_assoc] at H
exact this H inferInstance
wlog hY : IsAffine X generalizing X
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top X)]
intro U
have H := comp_of_isOpenImmersion P U.1.ι (f ≫ g) h
rw [← Category.assoc] at H
exact this H inferInstance
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at h ⊢
exact H _ _ h
lemma isMultiplicative (hPc : RingHom.StableUnderComposition Q)
(hPi : RingHom.ContainsIdentities Q) :
P.IsMultiplicative where
comp_mem := (stableUnderComposition hPc).comp_mem
id_mem := (containsIdentities hPi).id_mem
include Q in
lemma of_isOpenImmersion (hP : RingHom.ContainsIdentities Q) [IsOpenImmersion f] : P f :=
haveI : P.ContainsIdentities := containsIdentities hP
IsLocalAtSource.of_isOpenImmersion f
lemma isStableUnderBaseChange (hP : RingHom.IsStableUnderBaseChange Q) :
P.IsStableUnderBaseChange := by
apply HasAffineProperty.isStableUnderBaseChange
letI := HasAffineProperty.isLocal_affineProperty P
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsStableUnderBaseChange.mk
intros X Y S _ _ f g H
rw [← HasAffineProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at H ⊢
wlog hX : IsAffine Y generalizing Y
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P)
(Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfRight Y.affineCover f g)]
intro i
simp only [Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfRight_obj, Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfRight_map,
limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, Category.comp_id]
apply this _ (comp_of_isOpenImmersion _ _ _ H) inferInstance
rw [iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at H ⊢
| exact hP.pullback_fst_appTop _ (isLocal_ringHomProperty P).respectsIso _ _ H
include Q in
private lemma respects_isOpenImmersion_aux
(hQ : RingHom.StableUnderCompositionWithLocalizationAwaySource Q)
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} [IsAffine Y] {U : Y.Opens}
(f : X ⟶ U.toScheme) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ U.ι) := by
wlog hYa : ∃ (a : Γ(Y, ⊤)), U = Y.basicOpen a generalizing X Y
· obtain ⟨(Us : Set Y.Opens), hUs, heq⟩ := Opens.isBasis_iff_cover.mp (isBasis_basicOpen Y) U
let V (s : Us) : X.Opens := f ⁻¹ᵁ U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ s
rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) V]
· intro s
let f' : (V s).toScheme ⟶ U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ s := f ∣_ U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ s
have hf' : P f' := IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hf _
let e : (U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ s).toScheme ≅ s := IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq ((U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ s).ι ≫ U.ι) s.1.ι
(by simpa only [Scheme.comp_coeBase, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp, Scheme.Opens.range_ι,
Opens.map_coe, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff, heq, Opens.coe_sSup] using le_sSup s.2)
have heq : (V s).ι ≫ f ≫ U.ι = f' ≫ e.hom ≫ s.1.ι := by
simp only [V, IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_hom_fac, f', e, morphismRestrict_ι_assoc]
rw [heq, ← Category.assoc]
refine this _ ?_ ?_
· rwa [P.cancel_right_of_respectsIso]
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hUs s.2
use a, ha.symm
· apply f.preimage_iSup_eq_top
apply U.ι.image_injective
simp only [U.ι.image_iSup, U.ι.image_preimage_eq_opensRange_inter, Scheme.Opens.opensRange_ι]
conv_rhs => rw [Scheme.Hom.image_top_eq_opensRange, Scheme.Opens.opensRange_ι, heq]
ext : 1
have (i : Us) : U ⊓ i.1 = i.1 := by simp [heq, le_sSup i.property]
simp [this]
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hYa
wlog hX : IsAffine X generalizing X Y
· rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) _ (iSup_affineOpens_eq_top _)]
intro V
rw [← Category.assoc]
exact this _ _ (IsLocalAtSource.comp hf _) V.2
rw [HasRingHomProperty.iff_of_isAffine (P := P)] at hf ⊢
exact hQ _ a _ hf
/-- Any property of scheme morphisms induced by a property of ring homomorphisms is stable
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/RingHomProperties.lean | 525 | 565 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem self_modEq_zero : p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-1, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zero (z : ℤ) : z • p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem add_zsmul_modEq (z : ℤ) : a + z • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem zsmul_add_modEq (z : ℤ) : z • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
theorem add_nsmul_modEq (n : ℕ) : a + n • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp⟩
theorem nsmul_add_modEq (n : ℕ) : n • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
namespace ModEq
protected theorem add_zsmul (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + z • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_zsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem zsmul_add (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(zsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem add_nsmul (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + n • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_nsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem nsmul_add (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(nsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem of_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD z • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * z, by rwa [mul_smul]⟩
protected theorem of_nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD n • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * n, by rwa [mul_smul, natCast_zsmul]⟩
protected theorem zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
protected theorem nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
end ModEq
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ α] (hn : z ≠ 0) :
z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_modEq_nsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
alias ⟨ModEq.zsmul_cancel, _⟩ := zsmul_modEq_zsmul
alias ⟨ModEq.nsmul_cancel, _⟩ := nsmul_modEq_nsmul
namespace ModEq
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
protected alias ⟨add_left_cancel, add⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_left
protected alias ⟨add_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_right
protected alias ⟨sub_left_cancel, sub⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_left
protected alias ⟨sub_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_right
protected theorem add_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add h
protected theorem sub_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub h
protected theorem add_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
h.add modEq_rfl
protected theorem sub_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] :=
h.sub modEq_rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : α) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_left_cancel
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : α) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_right_cancel
protected theorem sub_left_cancel' (c : α) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_left_cancel
protected theorem sub_right_cancel' (c : α) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_right_cancel
end ModEq
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq' : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ c + a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp [ModEq, sub_sub]
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ a + c ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans <| by rw [add_comm]
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add' : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans modEq_comm
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq.trans modEq_comm
@[simp]
theorem sub_modEq_zero : a - b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by simp [sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add]
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_left : a + b ≡ a [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq']
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_right : a + b ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, b = a + z • p := by
simp_rw [ModEq, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_add_zsmul : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b ≠ a + z • p := by
rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, not_exists]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) = a := by
simp_rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff,
eq_sub_iff_add_eq', eq_comm]
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) ≠ a :=
modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples.not
end AddCommGroup
@[simp]
theorem modEq_iff_int_modEq {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD z] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD z] := by
simp [ModEq, dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne α] [CharZero α]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_modEq_intCast {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (z : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD z] := by
simp_rw [ModEq, ← Int.cast_mul_eq_zsmul_cast]
norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_modEq_intCast' {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (n : ℤ)] := by
simpa using intCast_modEq_intCast (α := α) (z := n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_modEq_natCast {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
simp_rw [← Int.natCast_modEq_iff, ← modEq_iff_int_modEq, ← @intCast_modEq_intCast α,
Int.cast_natCast]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_intCast, ModEq.intCast⟩ := intCast_modEq_intCast
alias ⟨_root_.Nat.ModEq.of_natCast, ModEq.natCast⟩ := natCast_modEq_natCast
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing α] {a b c p : α}
@[simp] lemma div_modEq_div (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c ≡ b / c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p * c)] := by
simp [ModEq, ← sub_div, div_eq_iff hc, mul_assoc]
@[simp] lemma mul_modEq_mul_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c ≡ b * c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p / c)] := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← div_modEq_div (inv_ne_zero hc), div_inv_eq_mul, div_inv_eq_mul]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field α] {a b c p : α}
@[simp] lemma mul_modEq_mul_left (hc : c ≠ 0) : c * a ≡ c * b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p / c)] := by
simp [mul_comm c, hc]
end Field
end AddCommGroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 311 | 312 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Opposites
/-!
# Morphisms from equations between objects.
When working categorically, sometimes one encounters an equation `h : X = Y` between objects.
Your initial aversion to this is natural and appropriate:
you're in for some trouble, and if there is another way to approach the problem that won't
rely on this equality, it may be worth pursuing.
You have two options:
1. Use the equality `h` as one normally would in Lean (e.g. using `rw` and `subst`).
This may immediately cause difficulties, because in category theory everything is dependently
typed, and equations between objects quickly lead to nasty goals with `eq.rec`.
2. Promote `h` to a morphism using `eqToHom h : X ⟶ Y`, or `eqToIso h : X ≅ Y`.
This file introduces various `simp` lemmas which in favourable circumstances
result in the various `eqToHom` morphisms to drop out at the appropriate moment!
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
/-- An equality `X = Y` gives us a morphism `X ⟶ Y`.
It is typically better to use this, rather than rewriting by the equality then using `𝟙 _`
which usually leads to dependent type theory hell.
-/
def eqToHom {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : X ⟶ Y := by rw [p]; exact 𝟙 _
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_refl (X : C) (p : X = X) : eqToHom p = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem eqToHom_trans {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y = Z) :
eqToHom p ≫ eqToHom q = eqToHom (p.trans q) := by
cases p
cases q
simp
/-- `eqToHom h` is heterogeneously equal to the identity of its domain. -/
lemma eqToHom_heq_id_dom (X Y : C) (h : X = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h) (𝟙 X) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- `eqToHom h` is heterogeneously equal to the identity of its codomain. -/
lemma eqToHom_heq_id_cod (X Y : C) (h : X = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h) (𝟙 Y) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- Two morphisms are conjugate via eqToHom if and only if they are heterogeneously equal.
Note this used to be in the Functor namespace, where it doesn't belong. -/
theorem conj_eqToHom_iff_heq {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W = Y) (h' : X = Z) :
f = eqToHom h ≫ g ≫ eqToHom h'.symm ↔ HEq f g := by
cases h
cases h'
simp
theorem conj_eqToHom_iff_heq' {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z : C}
(f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W = Y) (h' : Z = X) :
f = eqToHom h ≫ g ≫ eqToHom h' ↔ HEq f g := conj_eqToHom_iff_heq _ _ _ h'.symm
theorem comp_eqToHom_iff {X Y Y' : C} (p : Y = Y') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y') :
f ≫ eqToHom p = g ↔ f = g ≫ eqToHom p.symm :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => by simp [eq_whisker h (eqToHom p)] }
theorem eqToHom_comp_iff {X X' Y : C} (p : X = X') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y) :
eqToHom p ≫ g = f ↔ g = eqToHom p.symm ≫ f :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => h ▸ by simp [whisker_eq _ h] }
theorem eqToHom_comp_heq {C} [Category C] {W X Y : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (h : W = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h ≫ f) f := by
rw [← conj_eqToHom_iff_heq _ _ h rfl, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
@[simp] theorem eqToHom_comp_heq_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : W = Y) :
HEq (eqToHom h ≫ f) g ↔ HEq f g :=
⟨(eqToHom_comp_heq ..).symm.trans, (eqToHom_comp_heq ..).trans⟩
@[simp] theorem heq_eqToHom_comp_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : W = Y) :
HEq g (eqToHom h ≫ f) ↔ HEq g f :=
⟨(·.trans (eqToHom_comp_heq ..)), (·.trans (eqToHom_comp_heq ..).symm)⟩
theorem comp_eqToHom_heq {C} [Category C] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y = Z) : HEq (f ≫ eqToHom h) f := by
rw [← conj_eqToHom_iff_heq' _ _ rfl h, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
@[simp] theorem comp_eqToHom_heq_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : Y = W) :
HEq (f ≫ eqToHom h) g ↔ HEq f g :=
⟨(comp_eqToHom_heq ..).symm.trans, (comp_eqToHom_heq ..).trans⟩
@[simp] theorem heq_comp_eqToHom_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : Y = W) :
HEq g (f ≫ eqToHom h) ↔ HEq g f :=
⟨(·.trans (comp_eqToHom_heq ..)), (·.trans (comp_eqToHom_heq ..).symm)⟩
theorem heq_comp {C} [Category C] {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C}
{f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
(eq1 : X = X') (eq2 : Y = Y') (eq3 : Z = Z')
(H1 : HEq f f') (H2 : HEq g g') :
HEq (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g') := by
cases eq1; cases eq2; cases eq3; cases H1; cases H2; rfl
variable {β : Sort*}
/-- We can push `eqToHom` to the left through families of morphisms. -/
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
z j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ z j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- A variant on `eqToHom_naturality` that helps Lean identify the families `f` and `g`. -/
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
(z j).hom ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ (z j').hom := by
cases w
simp
/-- A variant on `eqToHom_naturality` that helps Lean identify the families `f` and `g`. -/
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_iso_inv_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
(z j).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ (z j').inv := by
cases w
simp
/-- Reducible form of congrArg_mpr_hom_left -/
@[simp]
theorem congrArg_cast_hom_left {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y ⟶ Z) :
cast (congrArg (fun W : C => W ⟶ Z) p.symm) q = eqToHom p ≫ q := by
cases p
simp
/-- If we (perhaps unintentionally) perform equational rewriting on
the source object of a morphism,
we can replace the resulting `_.mpr f` term by a composition with an `eqToHom`.
It may be advisable to introduce any necessary `eqToHom` morphisms manually,
rather than relying on this lemma firing.
-/
theorem congrArg_mpr_hom_left {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y ⟶ Z) :
(congrArg (fun W : C => W ⟶ Z) p).mpr q = eqToHom p ≫ q := by
cases p
simp
/-- Reducible form of `congrArg_mpr_hom_right` -/
@[simp]
theorem congrArg_cast_hom_right {X Y Z : C} (p : X ⟶ Y) (q : Z = Y) :
cast (congrArg (fun W : C => X ⟶ W) q.symm) p = p ≫ eqToHom q.symm := by
cases q
simp
/-- If we (perhaps unintentionally) perform equational rewriting on
the target object of a morphism,
we can replace the resulting `_.mpr f` term by a composition with an `eqToHom`.
It may be advisable to introduce any necessary `eqToHom` morphisms manually,
rather than relying on this lemma firing.
-/
theorem congrArg_mpr_hom_right {X Y Z : C} (p : X ⟶ Y) (q : Z = Y) :
(congrArg (fun W : C => X ⟶ W) q).mpr p = p ≫ eqToHom q.symm := by
cases q
simp
/-- An equality `X = Y` gives us an isomorphism `X ≅ Y`.
It is typically better to use this, rather than rewriting by the equality then using `Iso.refl _`
which usually leads to dependent type theory hell.
-/
def eqToIso {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : X ≅ Y :=
⟨eqToHom p, eqToHom p.symm, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso.hom {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : (eqToIso p).hom = eqToHom p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso.inv {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : (eqToIso p).inv = eqToHom p.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso_refl {X : C} (p : X = X) : eqToIso p = Iso.refl X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y = Z) :
eqToIso p ≪≫ eqToIso q = eqToIso (p.trans q) := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_op {X Y : C} (h : X = Y) : (eqToHom h).op = eqToHom (congr_arg op h.symm) := by
cases h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_unop {X Y : Cᵒᵖ} (h : X = Y) :
(eqToHom h).unop = eqToHom (congr_arg unop h.symm) := by
cases h
rfl
instance {X Y : C} (h : X = Y) : IsIso (eqToHom h) :=
(eqToIso h).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_eqToHom {X Y : C} (h : X = Y) : inv (eqToHom h) = eqToHom h.symm := by
aesop_cat
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Functor
/-- Proving equality between functors. This isn't an extensionality lemma,
because usually you don't really want to do this. -/
theorem ext {F G : C ⥤ D} (h_obj : ∀ X, F.obj X = G.obj X)
(h_map : ∀ X Y f,
F.map f = eqToHom (h_obj X) ≫ G.map f ≫ eqToHom (h_obj Y).symm := by aesop_cat) :
F = G := by
match F, G with
| mk F_pre _ _ , mk G_pre _ _ =>
match F_pre, G_pre with
| Prefunctor.mk F_obj _ , Prefunctor.mk G_obj _ =>
obtain rfl : F_obj = G_obj := by
ext X
apply h_obj
congr
funext X Y f
simpa using h_map X Y f
lemma ext_of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} (e : F ≅ G) (hobj : ∀ X, F.obj X = G.obj X)
(happ : ∀ X, e.hom.app X = eqToHom (hobj X)) : F = G :=
Functor.ext hobj (fun X Y f => by
rw [← cancel_mono (e.hom.app Y), e.hom.naturality f, happ, happ, Category.assoc,
Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id])
/-- Proving equality between functors using heterogeneous equality. -/
theorem hext {F G : C ⥤ D} (h_obj : ∀ X, F.obj X = G.obj X)
(h_map : ∀ (X Y) (f : X ⟶ Y), HEq (F.map f) (G.map f)) : F = G :=
Functor.ext h_obj fun _ _ f => (conj_eqToHom_iff_heq _ _ (h_obj _) (h_obj _)).2 <| h_map _ _ f
-- Using equalities between functors.
theorem congr_obj {F G : C ⥤ D} (h : F = G) (X) : F.obj X = G.obj X := by rw [h]
|
@[reassoc]
theorem congr_hom {F G : C ⥤ D} (h : F = G) {X Y} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.map f = eqToHom (congr_obj h X) ≫ G.map f ≫ eqToHom (congr_obj h Y).symm := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/EqToHom.lean | 265 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl, Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.AEStronglyMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Add
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Algebra
/-!
# Almost everywhere equal functions
We build a space of equivalence classes of functions, where two functions are treated as identical
if they are almost everywhere equal. We form the set of equivalence classes under the relation of
being almost everywhere equal, which is sometimes known as the `L⁰` space.
To use this space as a basis for the `L^p` spaces and for the Bochner integral, we consider
equivalence classes of strongly measurable functions (or, equivalently, of almost everywhere
strongly measurable functions.)
See `L1Space.lean` for `L¹` space.
## Notation
* `α →ₘ[μ] β` is the type of `L⁰` space, where `α` is a measurable space, `β` is a topological
space, and `μ` is a measure on `α`. `f : α →ₘ β` is a "function" in `L⁰`.
In comments, `[f]` is also used to denote an `L⁰` function.
`ₘ` can be typed as `\_m`. Sometimes it is shown as a box if font is missing.
## Main statements
* The linear structure of `L⁰` :
Addition and scalar multiplication are defined on `L⁰` in the natural way, i.e.,
`[f] + [g] := [f + g]`, `c • [f] := [c • f]`. So defined, `α →ₘ β` inherits the linear structure
of `β`. For example, if `β` is a module, then `α →ₘ β` is a module over the same ring.
See `mk_add_mk`, `neg_mk`, `mk_sub_mk`, `smul_mk`,
`add_toFun`, `neg_toFun`, `sub_toFun`, `smul_toFun`
* The order structure of `L⁰` :
`≤` can be defined in a similar way: `[f] ≤ [g]` if `f a ≤ g a` for almost all `a` in domain.
And `α →ₘ β` inherits the preorder and partial order of `β`.
TODO: Define `sup` and `inf` on `L⁰` so that it forms a lattice. It seems that `β` must be a
linear order, since otherwise `f ⊔ g` may not be a measurable function.
## Implementation notes
* `f.toFun` : To find a representative of `f : α →ₘ β`, use the coercion `(f : α → β)`, which
is implemented as `f.toFun`.
For each operation `op` in `L⁰`, there is a lemma called `coe_fn_op`,
characterizing, say, `(f op g : α → β)`.
* `ae_eq_fun.mk` : To constructs an `L⁰` function `α →ₘ β` from an almost everywhere strongly
measurable function `f : α → β`, use `ae_eq_fun.mk`
* `comp` : Use `comp g f` to get `[g ∘ f]` from `g : β → γ` and `[f] : α →ₘ γ` when `g` is
continuous. Use `comp_measurable` if `g` is only measurable (this requires the
target space to be second countable).
* `comp₂` : Use `comp₂ g f₁ f₂` to get `[fun a ↦ g (f₁ a) (f₂ a)]`.
For example, `[f + g]` is `comp₂ (+)`
## Tags
function space, almost everywhere equal, `L⁰`, ae_eq_fun
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
noncomputable section
open Topology Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory Function
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ ν : Measure α}
namespace MeasureTheory
section MeasurableSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable (β)
/-- The equivalence relation of being almost everywhere equal for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions. -/
def Measure.aeEqSetoid (μ : Measure α) : Setoid { f : α → β // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ } :=
⟨fun f g => (f : α → β) =ᵐ[μ] g, fun {f} => ae_eq_refl f.val, fun {_ _} => ae_eq_symm,
fun {_ _ _} => ae_eq_trans⟩
variable (α)
/-- The space of equivalence classes of almost everywhere strongly measurable functions, where two
strongly measurable functions are equivalent if they agree almost everywhere, i.e.,
they differ on a set of measure `0`. -/
def AEEqFun (μ : Measure α) : Type _ :=
Quotient (μ.aeEqSetoid β)
variable {α β}
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.AEEqFun]
notation:25 α " →ₘ[" μ "] " β => AEEqFun α β μ
end MeasurableSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace δ]
namespace AEEqFun
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Construct the equivalence class `[f]` of an almost everywhere measurable function `f`, based
on the equivalence relation of being almost everywhere equal. -/
def mk {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : α →ₘ[μ] β :=
Quotient.mk'' ⟨f, hf⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Coercion from a space of equivalence classes of almost everywhere strongly measurable
functions to functions. We ensure that if `f` has a constant representative,
then we choose that one. -/
@[coe]
def cast (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : α → β :=
if h : ∃ (b : β), f = mk (const α b) aestronglyMeasurable_const then
const α <| Classical.choose h else
AEStronglyMeasurable.mk _ (Quotient.out f : { f : α → β // AEStronglyMeasurable f μ }).2
/-- A measurable representative of an `AEEqFun` [f] -/
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₘ[μ] β) fun _ => α → β := ⟨cast⟩
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
simp only [cast]
split_ifs with h
· exact stronglyMeasurable_const
· apply AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_mk
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
f.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem measurable [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : Measurable f :=
f.stronglyMeasurable.measurable
protected theorem aemeasurable [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
f.measurable.aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_eq_mk (f : α → β) (hf) :
(Quot.mk (@Setoid.r _ <| μ.aeEqSetoid β) ⟨f, hf⟩ : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk f hf :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {f g : α → β} {hf hg} : (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk g hg ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
Quotient.eq''
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeFn (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : mk f f.aestronglyMeasurable = f := by
conv_lhs => simp only [cast]
split_ifs with h
· exact Classical.choose_spec h |>.symm
conv_rhs => rw [← Quotient.out_eq' f]
rw [← mk, mk_eq_mk]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk _).symm
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₘ[μ] β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by
rwa [← f.mk_coeFn, ← g.mk_coeFn, mk_eq_mk]
theorem coeFn_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [← mk_eq_mk, mk_coeFn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) {p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → Prop} (H : ∀ f hf, p (mk f hf)) : p f :=
Quotient.inductionOn' f <| Subtype.forall.2 H
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {α' β' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α'] [TopologicalSpace β'] {μ' : Measure α'}
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) (f' : α' →ₘ[μ'] β') {p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → (α' →ₘ[μ'] β') → Prop}
(H : ∀ f hf f' hf', p (mk f hf) (mk f' hf')) : p f f' :=
induction_on f fun f hf => induction_on f' <| H f hf
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₃ {α' β' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α'] [TopologicalSpace β'] {μ' : Measure α'}
{α'' β'' : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α''] [TopologicalSpace β''] {μ'' : Measure α''}
(f : α →ₘ[μ] β) (f' : α' →ₘ[μ'] β') (f'' : α'' →ₘ[μ''] β'')
{p : (α →ₘ[μ] β) → (α' →ₘ[μ'] β') → (α'' →ₘ[μ''] β'') → Prop}
(H : ∀ f hf f' hf' f'' hf'', p (mk f hf) (mk f' hf') (mk f'' hf'')) : p f f' f'' :=
induction_on f fun f hf => induction_on₂ f' f'' <| H f hf
end
/-!
### Composition of an a.e. equal function with a (quasi) measure preserving function
-/
section compQuasiMeasurePreserving
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β}
open MeasureTheory.Measure (QuasiMeasurePreserving)
/-- Composition of an almost everywhere equal function and a quasi measure preserving function.
See also `AEEqFun.compMeasurePreserving`. -/
def compQuasiMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (f : α → β) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' g (fun g ↦ mk (g ∘ f) <| g.2.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) fun _ _ h ↦
mk_eq_mk.2 <| h.comp_tendsto hf.tendsto_ae
@[simp]
theorem compQuasiMeasurePreserving_mk {g : β → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
(mk g hg).compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) :=
rfl
theorem compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (g.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf) := by
rw [← compQuasiMeasurePreserving_mk g.aestronglyMeasurable hf, mk_coeFn]
theorem coeFn_compQuasiMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f := by
rw [compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk]
apply coeFn_mk
end compQuasiMeasurePreserving
section compMeasurePreserving
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β}
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
/-- Composition of an almost everywhere equal function and a quasi measure preserving function.
This is an important special case of `AEEqFun.compQuasiMeasurePreserving`. We use a separate
definition so that lemmas that need `f` to be measure preserving can be `@[simp]` lemmas. -/
def compMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) : α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving f hf.quasiMeasurePreserving
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurePreserving_mk (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
(mk g hg).compMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf.quasiMeasurePreserving) :=
rfl
theorem compMeasurePreserving_eq_mk (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf =
mk (g ∘ f) (g.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving hf.quasiMeasurePreserving) :=
g.compQuasiMeasurePreserving_eq_mk _
theorem coeFn_compMeasurePreserving (g : β →ₘ[ν] γ) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
g.coeFn_compQuasiMeasurePreserving _
end compMeasurePreserving
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
/-- Given a continuous function `g : β → γ`, and an almost everywhere equal function `[f] : α →ₘ β`,
return the equivalence class of `g ∘ f`, i.e., the almost everywhere equal function
`[g ∘ f] : α →ₘ γ`. -/
def comp (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : α →ₘ[μ] γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' f (fun f => mk (g ∘ (f : α → β)) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable f.2))
fun _ _ H => mk_eq_mk.2 <| H.fun_comp g
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α → β) (hf) :
comp g hg (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β) = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hf) :=
rfl
theorem comp_eq_mk (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) :
comp g hg f = mk (g ∘ f) (hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable f.aestronglyMeasurable) := by
rw [← comp_mk g hg f f.aestronglyMeasurable, mk_coeFn]
theorem coeFn_comp (g : β → γ) (hg : Continuous g) (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : comp g hg f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f := by
rw [comp_eq_mk]
apply coeFn_mk
| theorem comp_compQuasiMeasurePreserving
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν} (g : γ → δ) (hg : Continuous g)
(f : β →ₘ[ν] γ) {φ : α → β} (hφ : Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving φ μ ν) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEEqFun.lean | 282 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
| theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 165 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
/-!
# Limits in concrete categories
In this file, we combine the description of limits in `Types` and the API about
the preservation of products and pullbacks in order to describe these limits in a
concrete category `C`.
If `F : J → C` is a family of objects in `C`, we define a bijection
`Limits.Concrete.productEquiv F : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)`.
Similarly, if `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S` are two morphisms, the elements
in `pullback f₁ f₂` are identified by `Limits.Concrete.pullbackEquiv`
to compatible tuples of elements in `X₁ × X₂`.
Some results are also obtained for the terminal object, binary products,
wide-pullbacks, wide-pushouts, multiequalizers and cokernels.
-/
universe w w' v u t r
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section Products
section ProductEquiv
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type max w v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w v} C FC] {J : Type w} (F : J → C)
[HasProduct F] [PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor F) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)` if `F : J → C` is a family of objects
in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def productEquiv : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j) :=
((PreservesProduct.iso (forget C) F) ≪≫ (Types.productIso.{w, v} fun j => ToType (F j))).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_apply_apply (x : ToType (∏ᶜ F)) (j : J) :
productEquiv F x j = Pi.π F j x :=
congr_fun (piComparison_comp_π (forget C) F j) x
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_symm_apply_π (x : ∀ j, ToType (F j)) (j : J) :
Pi.π F j ((productEquiv F).symm x) = x j := by
rw [← productEquiv_apply_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
end ProductEquiv
section ProductExt
variable {J : Type w} (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] {D : Type t} [Category.{r} D]
variable {FD : D → D → Type*} {DD : D → Type max w r} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (DD X) (DD Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w r} D FD] (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor f) F]
[HasProduct fun j => F.obj (f j)]
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan (forget D)]
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor fun b ↦ F.toPrefunctor.obj (f b)) (forget D)]
lemma Pi.map_ext (x y : ToType (F.obj (∏ᶜ f : C)))
(h : ∀ i, F.map (Pi.π f i) x = F.map (Pi.π f i) y) : x = y := by
apply ConcreteCategory.injective_of_mono_of_preservesPullback (PreservesProduct.iso F f).hom
apply Concrete.limit_ext _ (piComparison F _ x) (piComparison F _ y)
intro ⟨j⟩
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, piComparison_comp_π]
exact h j
end ProductExt
end Products
section Terminal
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves terminals and `X` is terminal, then `ToType X` is a
singleton. -/
noncomputable def uniqueOfTerminalOfPreserves [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : IsTerminal X) : Unique (ToType X) :=
Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X) <| IsTerminal.isTerminalObj (forget C) X h
/-- If `forget C` reflects terminals and `ToType X` is a singleton, then `X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def terminalOfUniqueOfReflects [ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : Unique (ToType X)) : IsTerminal X :=
IsTerminal.isTerminalOfObj (forget C) X <| (Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X)).symm h
/-- The equivalence `IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X)` if the forgetful functor
preserves and reflects terminals. -/
noncomputable def terminalIffUnique [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X) :=
(IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (forget C) X).trans <| Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
variable (C)
variable [HasTerminal C] [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit` when `C` is a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def terminalEquiv : ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit :=
(PreservesTerminal.iso (forget C) ≪≫ Types.terminalIso).toEquiv
noncomputable instance : Unique (ToType (⊤_ C)) where
default := (terminalEquiv C).symm PUnit.unit
uniq _ := (terminalEquiv C).injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end Terminal
section Initial
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves initials and `X` is initial, then `ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma empty_of_initial_of_preserves [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : Nonempty (IsInitial X)) : IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty]
exact Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialObj (forget C) _) h
/-- If `forget C` reflects initials and `ToType X` is empty, then `X` is initial. -/
lemma initial_of_empty_of_reflects [ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : IsEmpty (ToType X)) : Nonempty (IsInitial X) :=
Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialOfObj (forget C) _) <|
(Types.initial_iff_empty (ToType X)).mpr h
/-- If `forget C` preserves and reflects initials, then `X` is initial if and only if
`ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma initial_iff_empty_of_preserves_of_reflects [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
Nonempty (IsInitial X) ↔ IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty, (IsInitial.isInitialIffObj (forget C) X).nonempty_congr]
rfl
end Initial
section BinaryProducts
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC] (X₁ X₂ : C) [HasBinaryProduct X₁ X₂]
[PreservesLimit (pair X₁ X₂) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ (ToType X₁) × (ToType X₂)`
if `X₁` and `X₂` are objects in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def prodEquiv : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ :=
(PreservesLimitPair.iso (forget C) X₁ X₂ ≪≫ Types.binaryProductIso _ _).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_fst (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).fst = (Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_fst (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_snd (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).snd = (Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_snd (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_fst (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.1 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_snd (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.2 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
end BinaryProducts
section Pullbacks
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable {X₁ X₂ S : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S)
[HasPullback f₁ f₂] [PreservesLimit (cospan f₁ f₂) (forget C)]
/-- In a concrete category `C`, given two morphisms `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S`,
the elements in `pullback f₁ f₁` can be identified to compatible tuples of
elements in `X₁` and `X₂`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackEquiv :
ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) ≃ { p : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ // f₁ p.1 = f₂ p.2 } :=
(PreservesPullback.iso (forget C) f₁ f₂ ≪≫
Types.pullbackIsoPullback ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁) ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)).toEquiv
/-- Constructor for elements in a pullback in a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def pullbackMk (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
| ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) :=
(pullbackEquiv f₁ f₂).symm ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, h⟩
lemma pullbackMk_surjective (x : ToType (pullback f₁ f₂)) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ConcreteCategory.lean | 202 | 205 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jannis Limperg. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jannis Limperg
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
/-!
# Lemmas about List.*Idx functions.
Some specification lemmas for `List.mapIdx`, `List.mapIdxM`, `List.foldlIdx` and `List.foldrIdx`.
As of 2025-01-29, these are not used anywhere in Mathlib. Moreover, with
`List.enum` and `List.enumFrom` being replaced by `List.zipIdx`
in Lean's `nightly-2025-01-29` release, they now use deprecated functions and theorems.
Rather than updating this unused material, we are deprecating it.
Anyone wanting to restore this material is welcome to do so, but will need to update uses of
`List.enum` and `List.enumFrom` to use `List.zipIdx` instead.
However, note that this material will later be implemented in the Lean standard library.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
open Function
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section MapIdx
@[deprecated reverseRecOn (since := "2025-01-28")]
theorem list_reverse_induction (p : List α → Prop) (base : p [])
(ind : ∀ (l : List α) (e : α), p l → p (l ++ [e])) : (∀ (l : List α), p l) :=
fun l => l.reverseRecOn base ind
theorem mapIdx_append_one : ∀ {f : ℕ → α → β} {l : List α} {e : α},
mapIdx f (l ++ [e]) = mapIdx f l ++ [f l.length e] :=
mapIdx_concat
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29"), local simp]
theorem map_enumFrom_eq_zipWith : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → α → β),
map (uncurry f) (enumFrom n l) = zipWith (fun i ↦ f (i + n)) (range (length l)) l := by
intro l
generalize e : l.length = len
revert l
induction' len with len ih <;> intros l e n f
· have : l = [] := by
cases l
· rfl
· contradiction
rw [this]; rfl
· rcases l with - | ⟨head, tail⟩
· contradiction
· simp only [enumFrom_cons, map_cons, range_succ_eq_map, zipWith_cons_cons,
Nat.zero_add, zipWith_map_left, true_and]
rw [ih]
· suffices (fun i ↦ f (i + (n + 1))) = ((fun i ↦ f (i + n)) ∘ Nat.succ) by
rw [this]
rfl
funext n' a
simp only [comp, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_succ]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ.injEq] at e; exact e
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem get_mapIdx (l : List α) (f : ℕ → α → β) (i : ℕ) (h : i < l.length)
(h' : i < (l.mapIdx f).length := h.trans_le length_mapIdx.ge) :
(l.mapIdx f).get ⟨i, h'⟩ = f i (l.get ⟨i, h⟩) := by
simp [mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, enum_eq_zip_range]
theorem mapIdx_eq_ofFn (l : List α) (f : ℕ → α → β) :
l.mapIdx f = ofFn fun i : Fin l.length ↦ f (i : ℕ) (l.get i) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ IH => simp [IH]
end MapIdx
section FoldrIdx
-- Porting note: Changed argument order of `foldrIdxSpec` to align better with `foldrIdx`.
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- Specification of `foldrIdx`. -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
def foldrIdxSpec (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (b : β) (as : List α) (start : ℕ) : β :=
foldr (uncurry f) b <| enumFrom start as
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem foldrIdxSpec_cons (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (b a as start) :
foldrIdxSpec f b (a :: as) start = f start a (foldrIdxSpec f b as (start + 1)) :=
rfl
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem foldrIdx_eq_foldrIdxSpec (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (b as start) :
foldrIdx f b as start = foldrIdxSpec f b as start := by
induction as generalizing start
· rfl
· simp only [foldrIdx, foldrIdxSpec_cons, *]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem foldrIdx_eq_foldr_enum (f : ℕ → α → β → β) (b : β) (as : List α) :
foldrIdx f b as = foldr (uncurry f) b (enum as) := by
simp only [foldrIdx, foldrIdxSpec, foldrIdx_eq_foldrIdxSpec, enum]
end FoldrIdx
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem indexesValues_eq_filter_enum (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (as : List α) :
indexesValues p as = filter (p ∘ Prod.snd) (enum as) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [indexesValues, foldrIdx_eq_foldr_enum, uncurry,
filter_eq_foldr, cond_eq_if]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem findIdxs_eq_map_indexesValues (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (as : List α) :
findIdxs p as = map Prod.fst (indexesValues p as) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [indexesValues_eq_filter_enum,
map_filter_eq_foldr, findIdxs, uncurry, foldrIdx_eq_foldr_enum, decide_eq_true_eq, comp_apply,
Bool.cond_decide]
section FoldlIdx
-- Porting note: Changed argument order of `foldlIdxSpec` to align better with `foldlIdx`.
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- Specification of `foldlIdx`. -/
| @[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
def foldlIdxSpec (f : ℕ → α → β → α) (a : α) (bs : List β) (start : ℕ) : α :=
foldl (fun a p ↦ f p.fst a p.snd) a <| enumFrom start bs
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-01-29")]
theorem foldlIdxSpec_cons (f : ℕ → α → β → α) (a b bs start) :
| Mathlib/Data/List/Indexes.lean | 134 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Ella Yu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Additive energy
This file defines the additive energy of two finsets of a group. This is a central quantity in
additive combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.addEnergy`: The additive energy of two finsets in an additive group.
* `Finset.mulEnergy`: The multiplicative energy of two finsets in a group.
## Notation
The following notations are defined in the `Combinatorics.Additive` scope:
* `E[s, t]` for `Finset.addEnergy s t`.
* `Eₘ[s, t]` for `Finset.mulEnergy s t`.
* `E[s]` for `E[s, s]`.
* `Eₘ[s]` for `Eₘ[s, s]`.
## TODO
It's possibly interesting to have
`(s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter (fun x : (α × α) × α × α ↦ x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2)`
(whose `card` is `mulEnergy s t`) as a standalone definition.
-/
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
namespace Finset
section Mul
variable [Mul α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Finset α}
/-- The multiplicative energy `Eₘ[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`.
The notation `Eₘ[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive energy `E[s, t]` of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of
quadruples `(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`.
The notation `E[s, t]` is available in scope `Combinatorics.Additive`."]
def mulEnergy (s t : Finset α) : ℕ :=
(((s ×ˢ s) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t).filter fun x : (α × α) × α × α => x.1.1 * x.2.1 = x.1.2 * x.2.2).card
/-- The multiplicative energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s t
/-- The additive energy of two finsets `s` and `t` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × t × t` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s ", " t "]" => Finset.addEnergy s t
/-- The multiplicative energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ * b₁ = a₂ * b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "Eₘ[" s "]" => Finset.mulEnergy s s
/-- The additive energy of a finset `s` in a group is the number of quadruples
`(a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂) ∈ s × s × s × s` such that `a₁ + b₁ = a₂ + b₂`. -/
scoped[Combinatorics.Additive] notation3:max "E[" s "]" => Finset.addEnergy s s
open scoped Combinatorics.Additive
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
lemma mulEnergy_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t₂] := by
unfold mulEnergy; gcongr
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Eₘ[s₁, t] ≤ Eₘ[s₂, t] :=
mulEnergy_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : Eₘ[s, t₁] ≤ Eₘ[s, t₂] :=
mulEnergy_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[to_additive] lemma le_mulEnergy : s.card * t.card ≤ Eₘ[s, t] := by
rw [← card_product]
refine
card_le_card_of_injOn (@fun x => ((x.1, x.1), x.2, x.2)) (by simp) fun a _ b _ => ?_
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, and_self_iff, and_imp]
exact Prod.ext
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_pos (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] :=
(mul_pos hs.card_pos ht.card_pos).trans_le le_mulEnergy
variable (s t)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_left : Eₘ[∅, t] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_empty_right : Eₘ[s, ∅] = 0 := by simp [mulEnergy]
variable {s t}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_pos_iff : 0 < Eₘ[s, t] ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty where
mp h := of_not_not fun H => by
simp_rw [not_and_or, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at H
obtain rfl | rfl := H <;> simp [Nat.not_lt_zero] at h
mpr h := mulEnergy_pos h.1 h.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma mulEnergy_eq_zero_iff : Eₘ[s, t] = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp [← (Nat.zero_le _).not_gt_iff_eq, not_and_or, imp_iff_or_not, or_comm]
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_card_filter (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = (((s ×ˢ t) ×ˢ s ×ˢ t).filter fun ((a, b), c, d) ↦ a * b = c * d).card :=
card_equiv (.prodProdProdComm _ _ _ _) (by simp [and_and_and_comm])
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq' (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a ∈ s * t, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mulEnergy_eq_card_filter, sq, ← card_product]
rw [← card_disjiUnion]
-- The `swap`, `ext` and `simp` calls significantly reduce heartbeats
swap
· simp only [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, coe_mul, ne_eq, disjoint_left, mem_product,
mem_filter, not_and, and_imp, Prod.forall]
aesop
· congr
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_product, disjiUnion_eq_biUnion, mem_biUnion]
aesop (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq [Fintype α] (s t : Finset α) :
Eₘ[s, t] = ∑ a, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (x, y) ↦ x * y = a).card ^ 2 := by
rw [mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq']
exact Fintype.sum_subset <| by aesop (add simp [filter_eq_empty_iff, mul_mem_mul])
@[to_additive card_sq_le_card_mul_addEnergy]
lemma card_sq_le_card_mul_mulEnergy (s t u : Finset α) :
((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b ∈ u).card ^ 2 ≤ u.card * Eₘ[s, t] := by
calc
_ = (∑ c ∈ u, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card) ^ 2 := by
rw [← sum_card_fiberwise_eq_card_filter]
_ ≤ u.card * ∑ c ∈ u, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card ^ 2 := by
simpa using sum_mul_sq_le_sq_mul_sq (R := ℕ) _ 1 _
_ ≤ u.card * ∑ c ∈ s * t, ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b = c).card ^ 2 := by
refine mul_le_mul_left' (sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero ?_) _
aesop (add simp [filter_eq_empty_iff]) (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
_ = u.card * Eₘ[s, t] := by rw [mulEnergy_eq_sum_sq']
@[to_additive le_card_add_mul_addEnergy] lemma le_card_add_mul_mulEnergy (s t : Finset α) :
s.card ^ 2 * t.card ^ 2 ≤ (s * t).card * Eₘ[s, t] :=
calc
_ = ((s ×ˢ t).filter fun (a, b) ↦ a * b ∈ s * t).card ^ 2 := by
rw [filter_eq_self.2, card_product, mul_pow]; aesop (add unsafe mul_mem_mul)
_ ≤ (s * t).card * Eₘ[s, t] := card_sq_le_card_mul_mulEnergy _ _ _
end Mul
open scoped Combinatorics.Additive
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[to_additive] lemma mulEnergy_comm (s t : Finset α) : Eₘ[s, t] = Eₘ[t, s] := by
rw [mulEnergy, ← Finset.card_map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding, map_filter]
simp [-Finset.card_map, eq_comm, mulEnergy, mul_comm, map_eq_image, Function.comp_def]
end CommMonoid
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [Fintype α] (s t : Finset α)
| @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulEnergy_univ_left : Eₘ[univ, t] = Fintype.card α * t.card ^ 2 := by
simp only [mulEnergy, univ_product_univ, Fintype.card, sq, ← card_product]
let f : α × α × α → (α × α) × α × α := fun x => ((x.1 * x.2.2, x.1 * x.2.1), x.2)
have : (↑((univ : Finset α) ×ˢ t ×ˢ t) : Set (α × α × α)).InjOn f := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁, c₁⟩ _ ⟨a₂, b₂, c₂⟩ h₂ h
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/Energy.lean | 172 | 177 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.