Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Alena Gusakov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller, Pim Otte
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity.WalkCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DegreeSum
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
/-!
# Matchings
A *matching* for a simple graph is a set of disjoint pairs of adjacent vertices, and the set of all
the vertices in a matching is called its *support* (and sometimes the vertices in the support are
said to be *saturated* by the matching). A *perfect matching* is a matching whose support contains
every vertex of the graph.
In this module, we represent a matching as a subgraph whose vertices are each incident to at most
one edge, and the edges of the subgraph represent the paired vertices.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsMatching`: `M.IsMatching` means that `M` is a matching of its
underlying graph.
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsPerfectMatching` defines when a subgraph `M` of a simple graph is a
perfect matching, denoted `M.IsPerfectMatching`.
* `SimpleGraph.IsMatchingFree` means that a graph `G` has no perfect matchings.
* `SimpleGraph.IsCycles` means that a graph consists of cycles (including cycles of length 0,
also known as isolated vertices)
* `SimpleGraph.IsAlternating` means that edges in a graph `G` are alternatingly
included and not included in some other graph `G'`
## TODO
* Define an `other` function and prove useful results about it (https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/252551-graph-theory/topic/matchings/near/266205863)
* Provide a bicoloring for matchings (https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/252551-graph-theory/topic/matchings/near/265495120)
* Tutte's Theorem
* Hall's Marriage Theorem (see `Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Basic`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field TwoSidedIdeal
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W : Type*} {G G' : SimpleGraph V} {M M' : Subgraph G} {u v w : V}
namespace Subgraph
/--
The subgraph `M` of `G` is a matching if every vertex of `M` is incident to exactly one edge in `M`.
We say that the vertices in `M.support` are *matched* or *saturated*.
-/
def IsMatching (M : Subgraph G) : Prop := ∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ M.verts → ∃! w, M.Adj v w
/-- Given a vertex, returns the unique edge of the matching it is incident to. -/
noncomputable def IsMatching.toEdge (h : M.IsMatching) (v : M.verts) : M.edgeSet :=
⟨s(v, (h v.property).choose), (h v.property).choose_spec.1⟩
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_of_adj (h : M.IsMatching) (hv : v ∈ M.verts) (hvw : M.Adj v w) :
h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = ⟨s(v, w), hvw⟩ := by
simp only [IsMatching.toEdge, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
congr
exact ((h (M.edge_vert hvw)).choose_spec.2 w hvw).symm
theorem IsMatching.toEdge.surjective (h : M.IsMatching) : Surjective h.toEdge := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, he⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, M.edge_vert he⟩, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj _ he⟩
theorem IsMatching.toEdge_eq_toEdge_of_adj (h : M.IsMatching)
(hv : v ∈ M.verts) (hw : w ∈ M.verts) (ha : M.Adj v w) :
h.toEdge ⟨v, hv⟩ = h.toEdge ⟨w, hw⟩ := by
rw [h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hv ha, h.toEdge_eq_of_adj hw (M.symm ha), Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Sym2.eq_swap]
lemma IsMatching.map_ofLE (h : M.IsMatching) (hGG' : G ≤ G') :
(M.map (Hom.ofLE hGG')).IsMatching := by
intro _ hv
obtain ⟨_, hv, hv'⟩ := Set.mem_image _ _ _ |>.mp hv
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := h hv
use w
simpa using hv' ▸ hw
lemma IsMatching.eq_of_adj_left (hM : M.IsMatching) (huv : M.Adj u v) (huw : M.Adj u w) : v = w :=
(hM <| M.edge_vert huv).unique huv huw
lemma IsMatching.eq_of_adj_right (hM : M.IsMatching) (huw : M.Adj u w) (hvw : M.Adj v w) : u = v :=
hM.eq_of_adj_left huw.symm hvw.symm
lemma IsMatching.not_adj_left_of_ne (hM : M.IsMatching) (hvw : v ≠ w) (huv : M.Adj u v) :
¬M.Adj u w := fun huw ↦ hvw <| hM.eq_of_adj_left huv huw
lemma IsMatching.not_adj_right_of_ne (hM : M.IsMatching) (huv : u ≠ v) (huw : M.Adj u w) :
¬M.Adj v w := fun hvw ↦ huv <| hM.eq_of_adj_right huw hvw
lemma IsMatching.sup (hM : M.IsMatching) (hM' : M'.IsMatching)
(hd : Disjoint M.support M'.support) : (M ⊔ M').IsMatching := by
intro v hv
have aux {N N' : Subgraph G} (hN : N.IsMatching) (hd : Disjoint N.support N'.support)
(hmN: v ∈ N.verts) : ∃! w, (N ⊔ N').Adj v w := by
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := hN hmN
use w
refine ⟨sup_adj.mpr (.inl hw.1), ?_⟩
intro y hy
cases hy with
| inl h => exact hw.2 y h
| inr h =>
rw [Set.disjoint_left] at hd
simpa [(mem_support _).mpr ⟨w, hw.1⟩, (mem_support _).mpr ⟨y, h⟩] using @hd v
cases Set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union hv with
| | inl hmM => exact aux hM hd hmM
| inr hmM' =>
rw [sup_comm]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Matching.lean | 122 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.CardCommute
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Dihedral
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
/-!
# Commuting Probability
This file introduces the commuting probability of finite groups.
## Main definitions
* `commProb`: The commuting probability of a finite type with a multiplication operation.
## TODO
* Neumann's theorem.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
open Fintype
variable (M : Type*) [Mul M]
/-- The commuting probability of a finite type with a multiplication operation. -/
def commProb : ℚ :=
Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2
theorem commProb_def :
commProb M = Nat.card { p : M × M // Commute p.1 p.2 } / (Nat.card M : ℚ) ^ 2 :=
rfl
theorem commProb_prod (M' : Type*) [Mul M'] : commProb (M × M') = commProb M * commProb M' := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.card_prod, Nat.cast_mul, mul_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul,
← Nat.card_prod, Commute, SemiconjBy, Prod.ext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.1.2.1⟩, x.2.1⟩, ⟨⟨x.1.1.2, x.1.2.2⟩, x.2.2⟩⟩,
fun x => ⟨⟨⟨x.1.1.1, x.2.1.1⟩, ⟨x.1.1.2, x.2.1.2⟩⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_pi {α : Type*} (i : α → Type*) [Fintype α] [∀ a, Mul (i a)] :
commProb (∀ a, i a) = ∏ a, commProb (i a) := by
simp_rw [commProb_def, Finset.prod_div_distrib, Finset.prod_pow, ← Nat.cast_prod,
← Nat.card_pi, Commute, SemiconjBy, funext_iff]
congr 2
exact Nat.card_congr ⟨fun x a => ⟨⟨x.1.1 a, x.1.2 a⟩, x.2 a⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨fun a => (x a).1.1,
fun a => (x a).1.2⟩, fun a => (x a).2⟩, fun x => rfl, fun x => rfl⟩
theorem commProb_function {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Mul β] :
commProb (α → β) = (commProb β) ^ Fintype.card α := by
rw [commProb_pi, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
@[simp]
theorem commProb_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite M] : commProb M = 0 :=
div_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl (Nat.cast_eq_zero.2 Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite))
variable [Finite M]
theorem commProb_pos [h : Nonempty M] : 0 < commProb M :=
h.elim fun x ↦
div_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Finite.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨⟨(x, x), rfl⟩⟩))
(pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos) 2)
theorem commProb_le_one : commProb M ≤ 1 := by
refine div_le_one_of_le₀ ?_ (sq_nonneg (Nat.card M : ℚ))
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_le, sq, ← Nat.card_prod]
apply Finite.card_subtype_le
variable {M}
theorem commProb_eq_one_iff [h : Nonempty M] :
commProb M = 1 ↔ Std.Commutative ((· * ·) : M → M → M) := by
classical
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite M
rw [commProb, ← Set.coe_setOf, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [div_eq_one_iff_eq, ← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_inj, sq, ← card_prod,
set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x y ↦ h (x, y)⟩, fun h x ↦ h.comm x.1 x.2⟩
· exact pow_ne_zero 2 (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr card_ne_zero)
variable (G : Type*) [Group G]
theorem commProb_def' : commProb G = Nat.card (ConjClasses G) / Nat.card G := by
rw [commProb, card_comm_eq_card_conjClasses_mul_card, Nat.cast_mul, sq]
by_cases h : (Nat.card G : ℚ) = 0
· rw [h, zero_mul, div_zero, div_zero]
· exact mul_div_mul_right _ _ h
variable {G}
variable [Finite G] (H : Subgroup G)
theorem Subgroup.commProb_subgroup_le : commProb H ≤ commProb G * (H.index : ℚ) ^ 2 := by
/- After rewriting with `commProb_def`, we reduce to showing that `G` has at least as many
commuting pairs as `H`. -/
rw [commProb_def, commProb_def, div_le_iff₀, mul_assoc, ← mul_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul,
mul_comm H.index, H.card_mul_index, div_mul_cancel₀, Nat.cast_le]
· refine Finite.card_le_of_injective (fun p ↦ ⟨⟨p.1.1, p.1.2⟩, Subtype.ext_iff.mp p.2⟩) ?_
exact fun p q h ↦ by simpa only [Subtype.ext_iff, Prod.ext_iff] using h
· exact pow_ne_zero 2 (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr Finite.card_pos.ne')
· exact pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos) 2
theorem Subgroup.commProb_quotient_le [H.Normal] : commProb (G ⧸ H) ≤ commProb G * Nat.card H := by
/- After rewriting with `commProb_def'`, we reduce to showing that `G` has at least as many
conjugacy classes as `G ⧸ H`. -/
rw [commProb_def', commProb_def', div_le_iff₀, mul_assoc, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← Subgroup.index,
H.card_mul_index, div_mul_cancel₀, Nat.cast_le]
· apply Finite.card_le_of_surjective
show Function.Surjective (ConjClasses.map (QuotientGroup.mk' H))
exact ConjClasses.map_surjective Quotient.mk''_surjective
· exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr Finite.card_pos.ne'
· exact Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos
variable (G)
theorem inv_card_commutator_le_commProb : (↑(Nat.card (commutator G)))⁻¹ ≤ commProb G :=
(inv_le_iff_one_le_mul₀ (Nat.cast_pos.mpr Finite.card_pos)).mpr
(le_trans (ge_of_eq (commProb_eq_one_iff.mpr ⟨(Abelianization.commGroup G).mul_comm⟩))
(commutator G).commProb_quotient_le)
-- Construction of group with commuting probability 1/n
namespace DihedralGroup
lemma commProb_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) :
commProb (DihedralGroup n) = (n + 3) / (4 * n) := by
rw [commProb_def', DihedralGroup.card_conjClasses_odd hn, nat_card]
qify [show 2 ∣ n + 3 by rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, Nat.add_mod, Nat.odd_iff.mp hn]]
rw [div_div, ← mul_assoc]
congr
norm_num
private lemma div_two_lt {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) : n / 2 < n :=
Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0) (lt_add_one 1)
private lemma div_four_lt : {n : ℕ} → (h0 : n ≠ 0) → (h1 : n ≠ 1) → n / 4 + 1 < n
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 => by decide
| n + 4 => by omega
/-- A list of Dihedral groups whose product will have commuting probability `1 / n`. -/
def reciprocalFactors (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
if _ : n = 0 then [0]
else if _ : n = 1 then []
else if Even n then
3 :: reciprocalFactors (n / 2)
else
n % 4 * n :: reciprocalFactors (n / 4 + 1)
@[simp] lemma reciprocalFactors_zero : reciprocalFactors 0 = [0] := by
unfold reciprocalFactors; rfl
@[simp] lemma reciprocalFactors_one : reciprocalFactors 1 = [] := by
unfold reciprocalFactors; rfl
lemma reciprocalFactors_even {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) (h2 : Even n) :
reciprocalFactors n = 3 :: reciprocalFactors (n / 2) := by
have h1 : n ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
norm_num at h2
rw [reciprocalFactors, dif_neg h0, dif_neg h1, if_pos h2]
lemma reciprocalFactors_odd {n : ℕ} (h1 : n ≠ 1) (h2 : Odd n) :
reciprocalFactors n = n % 4 * n :: reciprocalFactors (n / 4 + 1) := by
have h0 : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
norm_num [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd] at h2
rw [reciprocalFactors, dif_neg h0, dif_neg h1, if_neg (Nat.not_even_iff_odd.2 h2)]
/-- A finite product of Dihedral groups. -/
abbrev Product (l : List ℕ) : Type :=
∀ i : Fin l.length, DihedralGroup l[i]
lemma commProb_nil : commProb (Product []) = 1 := by
simp [Product, commProb_pi]
lemma commProb_cons (n : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
commProb (Product (n :: l)) = commProb (DihedralGroup n) * commProb (Product l) := by
simp [Product, commProb_pi, Fin.prod_univ_succ]
/-- Construction of a group with commuting probability `1 / n`. -/
theorem commProb_reciprocal (n : ℕ) :
commProb (Product (reciprocalFactors n)) = 1 / n := by
by_cases h0 : n = 0
· rw [h0, reciprocalFactors_zero, commProb_cons, commProb_nil, mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, div_zero]
apply commProb_eq_zero_of_infinite
| by_cases h1 : n = 1
· rw [h1, reciprocalFactors_one, commProb_nil, Nat.cast_one, div_one]
rcases Nat.even_or_odd n with h2 | h2
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CommutingProbability.lean | 192 | 194 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
dsimp only [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem
unfold erase
revert h_mem; cases cmpLE x t_x <;> intro h_mem <;> dsimp only at h_mem ⊢
· have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_l_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.left
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_l_h
rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz
(Or.inl (Exists.intro t_l.size (And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_l, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_l_size := pos_size_of_mem h.left.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_l_size; rcases t_l.size with - | t_l_size <;> intro h_pos_t_l_size
· cases h_pos_t_l_size
· simp [Nat.add_right_comm]
· rw [(Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1).2, h.sz.1]; rfl
· have t_ih_r := t_ih_r' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_r_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.right
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_r_h
rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz
(Or.inr (Exists.intro t_r.size (And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_r, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_r_size := pos_size_of_mem h.right.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_r_size; rcases t_r.size with - | t_r_size <;> intro h_pos_t_r_size
· cases h_pos_t_r_size
· simp [Nat.add_assoc]
end Valid
end Ordnode
/-- An `Ordset α` is a finite set of values, represented as a tree. The operations on this type
maintain that the tree is balanced and correctly stores subtree sizes at each level. The
correctness property of the tree is baked into the type, so all operations on this type are correct
by construction. -/
def Ordset (α : Type*) [Preorder α] :=
{ t : Ordnode α // t.Valid }
namespace Ordset
open Ordnode
variable [Preorder α]
/-- O(1). The empty set. -/
nonrec def nil : Ordset α :=
⟨nil, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
/-- O(1). Get the size of the set. -/
def size (s : Ordset α) : ℕ :=
s.1.size
/-- O(1). Construct a singleton set containing value `a`. -/
protected def singleton (a : α) : Ordset α :=
⟨singleton a, valid_singleton⟩
instance instEmptyCollection : EmptyCollection (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instSingleton : Singleton α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.singleton⟩
/-- O(1). Is the set empty? -/
def Empty (s : Ordset α) : Prop :=
s = ∅
theorem empty_iff {s : Ordset α} : s = ∅ ↔ s.1.empty :=
⟨fun h => by cases h; exact rfl,
fun h => by cases s with | mk s_val _ => cases s_val <;> [rfl; cases h]⟩
instance Empty.instDecidablePred : DecidablePred (@Empty α _) :=
fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ empty_iff
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, this replaces it. -/
protected def insert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.insert x s.1, insert.valid _ s.2⟩
instance instInsert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] : Insert α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.insert⟩
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, the set is returned as is. -/
nonrec def insert' [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨insert' x s.1, insert'.valid _ s.2⟩
section
variable [DecidableLE α]
/-- O(log n). Does the set contain the element `x`? That is,
is there an element that is equivalent to `x` in the order? -/
def mem (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Bool :=
x ∈ s.val
/-- O(log n). Retrieve an element in the set that is equivalent to `x` in the order,
if it exists. -/
def find (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Option α :=
Ordnode.find x s.val
instance instMembership : Membership α (Ordset α) :=
⟨fun s x => mem x s⟩
instance mem.decidable (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
instDecidableEqBool _ _
theorem pos_size_of_mem {x : α} {t : Ordset α} (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by
simp? [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem says
simp only [Membership.mem, mem, Bool.decide_eq_true] at h_mem
apply Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem t.property.sz h_mem
end
/-- O(log n). Remove an element from the set equivalent to `x`. Does nothing if there
is no such element. -/
def erase [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.erase x s.val, Ordnode.erase.valid x s.property⟩
/-- O(n). Map a function across a tree, without changing the structure. -/
def map {β} [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset β :=
⟨Ordnode.map f s.val, Ordnode.map.valid f_strict_mono s.property⟩
end Ordset
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,074 | 1,080 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : {x ∈ s | x ≠ i}.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
/-- An affine combination over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points take only two values. -/
lemma affineCombination_apply_eq_lineMap_sum [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(p₁ p₂ : P) (s' : Finset ι) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hp₂ : ∀ i ∈ s ∩ s', p i = p₂)
(hp₁ : ∀ i ∈ s \ s', p i = p₁) :
s.affineCombination k p w = AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ (∑ i ∈ s ∩ s', w i) := by
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h p₁,
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← s.sum_inter_add_sum_diff s', AffineMap.lineMap_apply,
vadd_right_cancel_iff, sum_smul]
convert add_zero _ with i hi
· convert Finset.sum_const_zero with i hi
simp [hp₁ i hi]
· exact (hp₂ i hi).symm
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Pi.single i 1
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := Pi.single_eq_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
variable {k}
/-- Weights for expressing `lineMap` as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (c : k) : ι → k :=
c • weightedVSubVSubWeights k j i + affineCombinationSingleWeights k i
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i i c = affineCombinationSingleWeights k i := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c i = 1 - c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm, sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c j = c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i)
(hj : t ≠ j) (c : k) : affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 0 := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(c : k) : ∑ t ∈ s, affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 1 := by
simp_rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, Pi.add_apply, sum_add_distrib]
simp [hi, hj, ← mul_sum]
variable (k)
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationSingleWeights` gives the specified point. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationSingleWeights k i) = p i := by
refine s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ hi (by simp) ?_
rintro j - hj
simp [hj]
/-- A weighted subtraction with `weightedVSubVSubWeights` gives the result of subtracting the
specified points. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hj : j ∈ s) : s.weightedVSub p (weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j) = p i -ᵥ p j := by
rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, ← affineCombination_vsub,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hj]
variable {k}
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationLineMapWeights` gives the result of
`line_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (c : k) :
s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c) =
AffineMap.lineMap (p i) (p j) c := by
rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, ← weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination,
weightedVSub_const_smul, s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights k p hj hi, AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
end Finset
namespace Finset
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- The weights for the centroid of some points. -/
def centroidWeights : ι → k :=
Function.const ι (#s : k)⁻¹
/-- `centroidWeights` at any point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroidWeights_apply (i : ι) : s.centroidWeights k i = (#s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
/-- `centroidWeights` equals a constant function. -/
theorem centroidWeights_eq_const : s.centroidWeights k = Function.const ι (#s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
variable {k} in
/-- The weights in the centroid sum to 1, if the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero (h : (#s : k) ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by simp [h]
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] (h : #s ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by
simp_all
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (ne_of_gt (card_pos.2 h))
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] {n : ℕ} (h : #s = n + 1) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (h.symm ▸ Nat.succ_ne_zero n)
/-- The centroid of some points. Although defined for any `s`, this
is intended to be used in the case where the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
def centroid (p : ι → P) : P :=
s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k)
/-- The definition of the centroid. -/
theorem centroid_def (p : ι → P) : s.centroid k p = s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
theorem centroid_univ (s : Finset P) : univ.centroid k ((↑) : s → P) = s.centroid k id := by
rw [centroid, centroid, ← s.attach_affineCombination_coe]
congr
ext
simp
/-- The centroid of a single point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroid_singleton (p : ι → P) (i : ι) : ({i} : Finset ι).centroid k p = p i := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply]
/-- The centroid of two points, expressed directly as adding a vector
to a point. -/
theorem centroid_pair [DecidableEq ι] [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : ι → P) (i₁ i₂ : ι) :
({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι).centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p i₂ -ᵥ p i₁) +ᵥ p i₁ := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
· have hc : (#{i₁, i₂} : k) ≠ 0 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
norm_num
exact Invertible.ne_zero _
rw [centroid_def,
affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ _ _
(sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero _ hc) (p i₁)]
simp [h, one_add_one_eq_two]
/-- The centroid of two points indexed by `Fin 2`, expressed directly
as adding a vector to the first point. -/
theorem centroid_pair_fin [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : Fin 2 → P) :
univ.centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p 1 -ᵥ p 0) +ᵥ p 0 := by
rw [univ_fin2]
convert centroid_pair k p 0 1
/-- A centroid, over the image of an embedding, equals a centroid with
the same points and weights over the original `Finset`. -/
theorem centroid_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).centroid k p = s₂.centroid k (p ∘ e) := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_map, centroidWeights]
/-- `centroidWeights` gives the weights for the centroid as a
constant function, which is suitable when summing over the points
whose centroid is being taken. This function gives the weights in a
form suitable for summing over a larger set of points, as an indicator
function that is zero outside the set whose centroid is being taken.
In the case of a `Fintype`, the sum may be over `univ`. -/
def centroidWeightsIndicator : ι → k :=
Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k)
/-- The definition of `centroidWeightsIndicator`. -/
theorem centroidWeightsIndicator_def :
s.centroidWeightsIndicator k = Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
/-- The sum of the weights for the centroid indexed by a `Fintype`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator [Fintype ι] :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = ∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i :=
sum_indicator_subset _ (subset_univ _)
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is not
zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] [Fintype ι]
(h : #s ≠ 0) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k h
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty k h
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ}
(h : #s = n + 1) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one k h
/-- The centroid as an affine combination over a `Fintype`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
s.centroid k p = univ.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeightsIndicator k) :=
affineCombination_indicator_subset _ _ (subset_univ _)
/-- An indexed family of points that is injective on the given
`Finset` has the same centroid as the image of that `Finset`. This is
stated in terms of a set equal to the image to provide control of
definitional equality for the index type used for the centroid of the
image. -/
theorem centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {ps : Set P} [Fintype ps]
(hps : ps = p '' ↑s) : s.centroid k p = (univ : Finset ps).centroid k fun x => (x : P) := by
let f : p '' ↑s → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ s ∧ p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let f' : ps → ι := fun x => f ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf' : ∀ x, f' x ∈ s ∧ p (f' x) = x := fun x => hf ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf'i : Function.Injective f' := by
intro x y h
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, ← (hf' x).2, ← (hf' y).2, h]
let f'e : ps ↪ ι := ⟨f', hf'i⟩
have hu : Finset.univ.map f'e = s := by
ext x
rw [mem_map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact (hf' i).1
· intro hx
use ⟨p x, hps.symm ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩, mem_univ _
refine hi _ (hf' _).1 _ hx ?_
rw [(hf' _).2]
rw [← hu, centroid_map]
congr with x
change p (f' x) = ↑x
rw [(hf' x).2]
/-- Two indexed families of points that are injective on the given
`Finset`s and with the same points in the image of those `Finset`s
have the same centroid. -/
theorem centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {p₂ : ι₂ → P}
(hi₂ : ∀ i ∈ s₂, ∀ j ∈ s₂, p₂ i = p₂ j → i = j) (he : p '' ↑s = p₂ '' ↑s₂) :
s.centroid k p = s₂.centroid k p₂ := by
classical rw [s.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi rfl,
s₂.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi₂ he]
end Finset
section AffineSpace'
variable {ι k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P]
/-- A `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0 is in the `vectorSpan` of
an indexed family. -/
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(p : ι → P) : s.weightedVSub p w ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
· simp [Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty s]
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination,
Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p h (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
let w' := Set.indicator (↑s) w
have hwx : ∀ i, w' i ≠ 0 → i ∈ s := fun i => Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero
use Finsupp.onFinset s w' hwx, Set.subset_univ _
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, Finsupp.onFinset_sum hwx]
· apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
simp [w', Set.indicator_apply, if_pos hi]
· exact fun _ => zero_smul k _
/-- An `affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 is in the
`affineSpan` of an indexed family, if the underlying ring is
nontrivial. -/
theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k}
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 := h.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
have hn : s.Nonempty := Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero hnz
obtain ⟨i1, hi1⟩ := hn
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i1 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
simp only [w1, Function.const_zero, Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi1, Pi.zero_apply,
Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i1 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi1 (Function.update_self ..) fun _ _ hne =>
Function.update_of_ne hne ..
have hv : s.affineCombination k p w -ᵥ p i1 ∈ (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction := by
rw [direction_affineSpan, ← hw1s, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
apply weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan
simp [Pi.sub_apply, h, hw1]
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (p i1)]
exact AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_range_self _))
variable (k) in
/-- A vector is in the `vectorSpan` of an indexed family if and only
if it is a `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0. -/
theorem mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub {v : V} {p : ι → P} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 ∧ v = s.weightedVSub p w := by
classical
constructor
· rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
swap
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination]
rintro ⟨l, _, hv⟩
use insert i0 l.support
set w :=
(l : ι → k) - Function.update (Function.const ι 0 : ι → k) i0 (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i) with
hwdef
use w
have hw : ∑ i ∈ insert i0 l.support, w i = 0 := by
rw [hwdef]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _),
Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.1]
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, Finset.mem_insert, true_or, not_true,
Function.const_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, sub_self]
use hw
have hz : w i0 • (p i0 -ᵥ p i0 : V) = 0 := (vsub_self (p i0)).symm ▸ smul_zero _
change (fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i0 : V)) i0 = 0 at hz
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w p hw (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← hv, Finsupp.linearCombination_apply,
@Finset.sum_insert_zero _ _ l.support i0 _ _ _ hz]
change (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i • _) = _
congr with i
by_cases h : i = i0
· simp [h]
· simp [hwdef, h]
· rw [Set.range_eq_empty, vectorSpan_empty, Submodule.mem_bot]
rintro rfl
use ∅
simp
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan hw p
/-- A point in the `affineSpan` of an indexed family is an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1. See also
`eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype`. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan {p1 : P} {p : ι → P}
(h : p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p)) :
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = s.affineCombination k p w := by
classical
have hn : (affineSpan k (Set.range p) : Set P).Nonempty := ⟨p1, h⟩
rw [affineSpan_nonempty, Set.range_nonempty_iff_nonempty] at hn
obtain ⟨i0⟩ := hn
have h0 : p i0 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) := mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_range_self i0)
have hd : p1 -ᵥ p i0 ∈ (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction :=
AffineSubspace.vsub_mem_direction h h0
rw [direction_affineSpan, mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub] at hd
rcases hd with ⟨s, w, h, hs⟩
let s' := insert i0 s
let w' := Set.indicator (↑s) w
have h' : ∑ i ∈ s', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← h, Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_insert i0 s)]
have hs' : s'.weightedVSub p w' = p1 -ᵥ p i0 := by
rw [hs]
exact (Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_insert i0 s)).symm
let w0 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw0 : ∑ i ∈ s', w0 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, true_or, not_true, Function.const_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero,
add_zero]
have hw0s : s'.affineCombination k p w0 = p i0 :=
s'.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w0 p (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
(Function.update_self ..) fun _ _ hne => Function.update_of_ne hne _ _
refine ⟨s', w0 + w', ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, hw0, h']
· rw [add_comm, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, hw0s, hs', vsub_vadd]
theorem eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype [Fintype ι] {p1 : P} {p : ι → P}
(h : p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p)) :
∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w := by
classical
obtain ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩ := eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan h
refine
⟨(s : Set ι).indicator w, ?_, Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w p s.subset_univ⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Set.indicator_apply, ← hw]
rw [Fintype.sum_extend_by_zero s w]
variable (k V)
/-- A point is in the `affineSpan` of an indexed family if and only
if it is an `affineCombination` with sum of weights 1, provided the
underlying ring is nontrivial. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination [Nontrivial k] {p1 : P} {p : ι → P} :
p1 ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 ∧ p1 = s.affineCombination k p w := by
constructor
· exact eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan hw p
/-- Given a family of points together with a chosen base point in that family, membership of the
affine span of this family corresponds to an identity in terms of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, with
weights that are not required to sum to 1. -/
theorem mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd [Nontrivial k] (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (q : P) :
q ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), q = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w +ᵥ p j := by
constructor
· intro hq
obtain ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩ := eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan hq
exact ⟨s, w, s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw (p j)⟩
· rintro ⟨s, w, rfl⟩
classical
let w' : ι → k := Function.update w j (1 - (s \ {j}).sum w)
have h₁ : (insert j s).sum w' = 1 := by
by_cases hj : j ∈ s
· simp [w', Finset.sum_update_of_mem hj, Finset.insert_eq_of_mem hj]
· simp_rw [w', Finset.sum_insert hj, Finset.sum_update_of_not_mem hj, Function.update_self,
← Finset.erase_eq, Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem hj, sub_add_cancel]
have hww : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w i = w' i := by
intro i hij
simp [w', hij]
rw [s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq p j w w' hww, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert w' p j, ←
(insert j s).affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w' p h₁ (p j)]
exact affineCombination_mem_affineSpan h₁ p
variable {k V}
/-- Given a set of points, together with a chosen base point in this set, if we affinely transport
all other members of the set along the line joining them to this base point, the affine span is
unchanged. -/
theorem affineSpan_eq_affineSpan_lineMap_units [Nontrivial k] {s : Set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s)
(w : s → Units k) :
affineSpan k (Set.range fun q : s => AffineMap.lineMap p ↑q (w q : k)) = affineSpan k s := by
have : s = Set.range ((↑) : s → P) := by simp
conv_rhs =>
rw [this]
apply le_antisymm
<;> intro q hq
<;> erw [mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd k V _ (⟨p, hp⟩ : s) q] at hq ⊢
<;> obtain ⟨t, μ, rfl⟩ := hq
<;> use t
<;> [use fun x => μ x * ↑(w x); use fun x => μ x * ↑(w x)⁻¹]
<;> simp [smul_smul]
end AffineSpace'
section DivisionRing
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
open Set Finset
/-- The centroid lies in the affine span if the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
theorem centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_cast_card_ne_zero {s : Finset ι} (p : ι → P)
(h : (#s : k) ≠ 0) : s.centroid k p ∈ affineSpan k (range p) :=
affineCombination_mem_affineSpan (s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero h) p
variable (k)
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the centroid lies in the affine
span if the number of points is not zero. -/
theorem centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] {s : Finset ι} (p : ι → P)
(h : #s ≠ 0) : s.centroid k p ∈ affineSpan k (range p) :=
affineCombination_mem_affineSpan (s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k h) p
|
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the centroid lies in the affine
span if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_nonempty [CharZero k] {s : Finset ι} (p : ι → P)
(h : s.Nonempty) : s.centroid k p ∈ affineSpan k (range p) :=
affineCombination_mem_affineSpan (s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty k h) p
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the centroid lies in the affine
span if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 1,116 | 1,124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
| · by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 228 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Laurent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
/-!
# Characteristic polynomials
We give methods for computing coefficients of the characteristic polynomial.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.charpoly_degree_eq_dim` proves that the degree of the characteristic polynomial
over a nonzero ring is the dimension of the matrix
- `Matrix.det_eq_sign_charpoly_coeff` proves that the determinant is the constant term of the
characteristic polynomial, up to sign.
- `Matrix.trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff` proves that the trace is the negative of the (d-1)th
coefficient of the characteristic polynomial, where d is the dimension of the matrix.
For a nonzero ring, this is the second-highest coefficient.
- `Matrix.charpolyRev` the reverse of the characteristic polynomial.
- `Matrix.reverse_charpoly` characterises the reverse of the characteristic polynomial.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w z
open Finset Matrix Polynomial
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {n G : Type v} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable {α β : Type v} [DecidableEq α]
variable {M : Matrix n n R}
namespace Matrix
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree [Nontrivial R] (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree = ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [h, ← degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.succ_pos 0)]
theorem charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le (i j : n) :
(charmatrix M i j).natDegree ≤ ite (i = j) 1 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, natDegree_X_le]
variable (M)
theorem charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt :
(M.charpoly - ∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree < ↑(Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly, det_apply', ← insert_erase (mem_univ (Equiv.refl n)),
sum_insert (not_mem_erase (Equiv.refl n) univ), add_comm]
simp only [charmatrix_apply_eq, one_mul, Equiv.Perm.sign_refl, id, Int.cast_one,
Units.val_one, add_sub_cancel_right, Equiv.coe_refl]
rw [← mem_degreeLT]
apply Submodule.sum_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1))
intro c hc; rw [← C_eq_intCast, C_mul']
apply Submodule.smul_mem (degreeLT R (Fintype.card n - 1)) ↑↑(Equiv.Perm.sign c)
rw [mem_degreeLT]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt degree_le_natDegree _
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one (ne_of_mem_erase hc))
apply le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le univ fun i : n => charmatrix M (c i) i) _
rw [card_eq_sum_ones]; rw [sum_filter]; apply sum_le_sum
intros
apply charmatrix_apply_natDegree_le
theorem charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le {k : ℕ} (h : Fintype.card n - 1 ≤ k) :
M.charpoly.coeff k = (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).coeff k := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero; rw [← coeff_sub]
apply Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M) ?_
rw [Nat.cast_le]; apply h
theorem det_of_card_zero (h : Fintype.card n = 0) (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at h
suffices M = 1 by simp [this]
ext i
exact h.elim i
theorem charpoly_degree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.degree = Fintype.card n := by
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [h]
unfold charpoly
rw [det_of_card_zero]
· simp
· assumption
rw [← sub_add_cancel M.charpoly (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i)))]
-- Porting note: added `↑` in front of `Fintype.card n`
have h1 : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).degree = ↑(Fintype.card n) := by
rw [degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h), natDegree_prod']
· simp_rw [natDegree_X_sub_C]
rw [← Finset.card_univ, sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
simp_rw [(monic_X_sub_C _).leadingCoeff]
simp
rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt]
· exact h1
rw [h1]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
@[simp] theorem charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim [Nontrivial R] (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.charpoly.natDegree = Fintype.card n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (charpoly_degree_eq_dim M)
theorem charpoly_monic (M : Matrix n n R) : M.charpoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
by_cases h : Fintype.card n = 0
· rw [charpoly, det_of_card_zero h]
apply monic_one
have mon : (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))).Monic := by
apply monic_prod_of_monic univ fun i : n => X - C (M i i)
simp [monic_X_sub_C]
rw [← sub_add_cancel (∏ i : n, (X - C (M i i))) M.charpoly] at mon
rw [Monic] at *
rwa [leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt] at mon
rw [charpoly_degree_eq_dim]
rw [← neg_sub]
rw [degree_neg]
apply lt_trans (charpoly_sub_diagonal_degree_lt M)
rw [Nat.cast_lt]
rw [← Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]
apply Nat.pred_lt
apply h
/-- See also `Matrix.coeff_charpolyRev_eq_neg_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_neg_charpoly_coeff [Nonempty n] (M : Matrix n n R) :
trace M = -M.charpoly.coeff (Fintype.card n - 1) := by
rw [charpoly_coeff_eq_prod_coeff_of_le _ le_rfl, Fintype.card,
prod_X_sub_C_coeff_card_pred univ (fun i : n => M i i) Fintype.card_pos, neg_neg, trace]
simp_rw [diag_apply]
theorem matPolyEquiv_symm_map_eval (M : (Matrix n n R)[X]) (r : R) :
(matPolyEquiv.symm M).map (eval r) = M.eval (scalar n r) := by
suffices ((aeval r).mapMatrix.comp matPolyEquiv.symm.toAlgHom : (Matrix n n R)[X] →ₐ[R] _) =
(eval₂AlgHom' (AlgHom.id R _) (scalar n r)
fun x => (scalar_commute _ (Commute.all _) _).symm) from
DFunLike.congr_fun this M
ext : 1
· ext M : 1
simp [Function.comp_def]
· simp [smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem matPolyEquiv_eval_eq_map (M : Matrix n n R[X]) (r : R) :
(matPolyEquiv M).eval (scalar n r) = M.map (eval r) := by
simpa only [AlgEquiv.symm_apply_apply] using (matPolyEquiv_symm_map_eval (matPolyEquiv M) r).symm
-- I feel like this should use `Polynomial.algHom_eval₂_algebraMap`
theorem matPolyEquiv_eval (M : Matrix n n R[X]) (r : R) (i j : n) :
(matPolyEquiv M).eval (scalar n r) i j = (M i j).eval r := by
rw [matPolyEquiv_eval_eq_map, map_apply]
theorem eval_det (M : Matrix n n R[X]) (r : R) :
Polynomial.eval r M.det = (Polynomial.eval (scalar n r) (matPolyEquiv M)).det := by
rw [Polynomial.eval, ← coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_det]
apply congr_arg det
ext
symm
exact matPolyEquiv_eval _ _ _ _
theorem det_eq_sign_charpoly_coeff (M : Matrix n n R) :
M.det = (-1) ^ Fintype.card n * M.charpoly.coeff 0 := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, charpoly, eval_det, matPolyEquiv_charmatrix, ← det_smul]
simp
lemma eval_det_add_X_smul (A : Matrix n n R[X]) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(det (A + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).eval 0 = (det A).eval 0 := by
simp only [eval_det, map_zero, map_add, eval_add, Algebra.smul_def, map_mul]
simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, matPolyEquiv_smul_one, map_X, X_mul, eval_mul_X,
mul_zero, add_zero]
lemma derivative_det_one_add_X_smul_aux {n} (M : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) R) :
(derivative <| det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).eval 0 = trace M := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
rw [det_succ_row_zero, map_sum, eval_finset_sum]
simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, map_apply, smul_eq_mul, X_mul_C, submatrix_add,
submatrix_smul, Pi.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, submatrix_map, derivative_mul, map_add,
derivative_C, zero_mul, derivative_X, mul_one, zero_add, eval_add, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_X,
mul_zero, add_zero, eval_det_add_X_smul, eval_pow, eval_neg, eval_one]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [Fin.val_zero, pow_zero, derivative_one, eval_zero, one_apply_eq, eval_one,
mul_one, zero_add, one_mul, Fin.succAbove_zero, submatrix_one _ (Fin.succ_injective _),
det_one, IH, trace_submatrix_succ]
· intro i _ hi
cases n with
| zero => exact (hi (Subsingleton.elim i 0)).elim
| succ n =>
simp only [one_apply_ne' hi, eval_zero, mul_zero, zero_add, zero_mul, add_zero]
rw [det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero 0, eval_zero, mul_zero]
intro j
rw [submatrix_apply, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, one_apply_ne]
· exact (bne_iff_ne (a := Fin.succ j) (b := Fin.castSucc 0)).mp rfl
· rw [Fin.castSucc_zero]; exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Fin.zero_le _) hi.symm
· exact fun H ↦ (H <| Finset.mem_univ _).elim
/-- The derivative of `det (1 + M X)` at `0` is the trace of `M`. -/
lemma derivative_det_one_add_X_smul (M : Matrix n n R) :
(derivative <| det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).eval 0 = trace M := by
let e := Matrix.reindexLinearEquiv R R (Fintype.equivFin n) (Fintype.equivFin n)
rw [← Matrix.det_reindexLinearEquiv_self R[X] (Fintype.equivFin n)]
convert derivative_det_one_add_X_smul_aux (e M)
· ext; simp [map_add, e]
· delta trace
rw [← (Fintype.equivFin n).symm.sum_comp]
simp_rw [e, reindexLinearEquiv_apply, reindex_apply, diag_apply, submatrix_apply]
lemma coeff_det_one_add_X_smul_one (M : Matrix n n R) :
(det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).coeff 1 = trace M := by
simp only [← derivative_det_one_add_X_smul, ← coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero,
coeff_derivative, zero_add, Nat.cast_zero, mul_one]
lemma det_one_add_X_smul (M : Matrix n n R) :
det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C) =
(1 : R[X]) + trace M • X + (det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).divX.divX * X ^ 2 := by
rw [Algebra.smul_def (trace M), ← C_eq_algebraMap, pow_two, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc,
← add_mul, ← coeff_det_one_add_X_smul_one, ← coeff_divX, add_comm (C _), divX_mul_X_add,
add_comm (1 : R[X]), ← C.map_one]
convert (divX_mul_X_add _).symm
rw [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, eval_det_add_X_smul, det_one, eval_one]
/-- The first two terms of the taylor expansion of `det (1 + r • M)` at `r = 0`. -/
lemma det_one_add_smul (r : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
| det (1 + r • M) =
1 + trace M * r + (det (1 + (X : R[X]) • M.map C)).divX.divX.eval r * r ^ 2 := by
simpa [eval_det, ← smul_eq_mul_diagonal] using congr_arg (eval r) (Matrix.det_one_add_X_smul M)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Coeff.lean | 236 | 239 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Canonical
/-!
# Grothendieck Topology and Sheaves on the Category of Types
In this file we define a Grothendieck topology on the category of types,
and construct the canonical functor that sends a type to a sheaf over
the category of types, and make this an equivalence of categories.
Then we prove that the topology defined is the canonical topology.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A Grothendieck topology associated to the category of all types.
A sieve is a covering iff it is jointly surjective. -/
def typesGrothendieckTopology : GrothendieckTopology (Type u) where
sieves α S := ∀ x : α, S fun _ : PUnit => x
top_mem' _ _ := trivial
pullback_stable' _ _ _ f hs x := hs (f x)
transitive' _ _ hs _ hr x := hr (hs x) PUnit.unit
/-- The discrete sieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose image is a subsingleton. -/
@[simps]
def discreteSieve (α : Type u) : Sieve α where
arrows _ f := ∃ x, ∀ y, f y = x
downward_closed := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ g => ⟨x, fun y => hx <| g y⟩
theorem discreteSieve_mem (α : Type u) : discreteSieve α ∈ typesGrothendieckTopology α :=
fun x => ⟨x, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- The discrete presieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose domain is a singleton. -/
def discretePresieve (α : Type u) : Presieve α :=
fun β _ => ∃ x : β, ∀ y : β, y = x
theorem generate_discretePresieve_mem (α : Type u) :
Sieve.generate (discretePresieve α) ∈ typesGrothendieckTopology α :=
fun x => ⟨PUnit, id, fun _ => x, ⟨PUnit.unit, fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩, rfl⟩
/-- The sheaf condition for `yoneda'`. -/
theorem Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda' {α : Type u} :
Presieve.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (yoneda.obj α) :=
fun β _ hs x hx =>
⟨fun y => x _ (hs y) PUnit.unit, fun γ f h =>
funext fun z => by
convert congr_fun (hx (𝟙 _) (fun _ => z) (hs <| f z) h rfl) PUnit.unit using 1,
fun f hf => funext fun y => by convert congr_fun (hf _ (hs y)) PUnit.unit⟩
/-- The sheaf condition for `yoneda'`. -/
theorem Presheaf.isSheaf_yoneda' {α : Type u} :
Presheaf.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (yoneda.obj α) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type]
exact Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-26")] alias isSheaf_yoneda' := Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda'
/-- The yoneda functor that sends a type to a sheaf over the category of types. -/
@[simps]
def yoneda' : Type u ⥤ Sheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (Type u) where
obj α := ⟨yoneda.obj α, Presheaf.isSheaf_yoneda'⟩
map f := ⟨yoneda.map f⟩
@[simp]
theorem yoneda'_comp : yoneda'.{u} ⋙ sheafToPresheaf _ _ = yoneda :=
rfl
open Opposite
/-- Given a presheaf `P` on the category of types, construct
a map `P(α) → (α → P(*))` for all type `α`. -/
def eval (P : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (α : Type u) (s : P.obj (op α)) (x : α) : P.obj (op PUnit) :=
P.map (↾fun _ => x).op s
open Presieve
/-- Given a sheaf `S` on the category of types, construct a map
`(α → S(*)) → S(α)` that is inverse to `eval`. -/
noncomputable def typesGlue (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hs : IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology S)
(α : Type u) (f : α → S.obj (op PUnit)) : S.obj (op α) :=
(hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem α)).amalgamate
(fun _ g hg => S.map (↾fun _ => PUnit.unit).op <| f <| g <| Classical.choose hg)
fun β γ δ g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ h =>
(hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem δ)).isSeparatedFor.ext fun ε g ⟨x, _⟩ => by
have : f₁ (Classical.choose hf₁) = f₂ (Classical.choose hf₂) :=
Classical.choose_spec hf₁ (g₁ <| g x) ▸
Classical.choose_spec hf₂ (g₂ <| g x) ▸ congr_fun h _
simp_rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, this, ← op_comp]
rfl
theorem eval_typesGlue {S hs α} (f) : eval.{u} S α (typesGlue S hs α f) = f := by
funext x
apply (IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ <| ⟨PUnit.unit, fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩).trans
convert FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply S _
theorem typesGlue_eval {S hs α} (s) : typesGlue.{u} S hs α (eval S α s) = s := by
apply (hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem α)).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro β f hf
apply (IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ hf).trans
apply (FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply _ _ _ _).symm.trans
rw [← op_comp]
--congr 2 -- Porting note: This tactic didn't work. Find an alternative.
suffices ((↾fun _ ↦ PUnit.unit) ≫ ↾fun _ ↦ f (Classical.choose hf)) = f by rw [this]
funext x
exact congr_arg f (Classical.choose_spec hf x).symm
/-- Given a sheaf `S`, construct an equivalence `S(α) ≃ (α → S(*))`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def evalEquiv (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hs : Presheaf.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology S)
(α : Type u) : S.obj (op α) ≃ (α → S.obj (op PUnit)) where
toFun := eval S α
invFun := typesGlue S ((isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type _ _ ).1 hs) α
left_inv := typesGlue_eval
right_inv := eval_typesGlue
theorem eval_map (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (α β) (f : β ⟶ α) (s x) :
eval S β (S.map f.op s) x = eval S α s (f x) := by
simp_rw [eval, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp]; rfl
/-- Given a sheaf `S`, construct an isomorphism `S ≅ [-, S(*)]`. -/
@[simps!]
| noncomputable def equivYoneda (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hs : Presheaf.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology S) :
S ≅ yoneda.obj (S.obj (op PUnit)) :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Types.lean | 130 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
/-!
# Monovarying functions and algebraic operations
This file characterises the interaction of ordered algebraic structures with monovariance
of functions.
## See also
`Algebra.Order.Rearrangement` for the n-ary rearrangement inequality
-/
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Algebraic operations on monovarying functions -/
section OrderedCommGroup
section
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] [PartialOrder β]
{s : Set ι} {f f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma monovaryOn_inv_left : MonovaryOn f⁻¹ g s ↔ AntivaryOn f g s := by
simp [MonovaryOn, AntivaryOn]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma antivaryOn_inv_left : AntivaryOn f⁻¹ g s ↔ MonovaryOn f g s := by
simp [MonovaryOn, AntivaryOn]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma monovary_inv_left : Monovary f⁻¹ g ↔ Antivary f g := by
simp [Monovary, Antivary]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma antivary_inv_left : Antivary f⁻¹ g ↔ Monovary f g := by
simp [Monovary, Antivary]
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.mul_left (h₁ : MonovaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f₂ g s) :
MonovaryOn (f₁ * f₂) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ mul_le_mul' (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij)
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.mul_left (h₁ : AntivaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f₂ g s) :
AntivaryOn (f₁ * f₂) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ mul_le_mul' (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij)
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.div_left (h₁ : MonovaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f₂ g s) :
MonovaryOn (f₁ / f₂) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ div_le_div'' (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij)
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.div_left (h₁ : AntivaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f₂ g s) :
AntivaryOn (f₁ / f₂) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ div_le_div'' (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij)
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.pow_left (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
MonovaryOn (f ^ n) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left' (hfg hi hj hij) _
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.pow_left (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
AntivaryOn (f ^ n) g s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left' (hfg hi hj hij) _
@[to_additive]
lemma Monovary.mul_left (h₁ : Monovary f₁ g) (h₂ : Monovary f₂ g) : Monovary (f₁ * f₂) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ mul_le_mul' (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij)
@[to_additive]
lemma Antivary.mul_left (h₁ : Antivary f₁ g) (h₂ : Antivary f₂ g) : Antivary (f₁ * f₂) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ mul_le_mul' (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij)
@[to_additive]
lemma Monovary.div_left (h₁ : Monovary f₁ g) (h₂ : Antivary f₂ g) : Monovary (f₁ / f₂) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ div_le_div'' (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij)
@[to_additive]
lemma Antivary.div_left (h₁ : Antivary f₁ g) (h₂ : Monovary f₂ g) : Antivary (f₁ / f₂) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ div_le_div'' (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij)
@[to_additive] lemma Monovary.pow_left (hfg : Monovary f g) (n : ℕ) : Monovary (f ^ n) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left' (hfg hij) _
@[to_additive] lemma Antivary.pow_left (hfg : Antivary f g) (n : ℕ) : Antivary (f ^ n) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left' (hfg hij) _
end
section
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β]
{s : Set ι} {f f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma monovaryOn_inv_right : MonovaryOn f g⁻¹ s ↔ AntivaryOn f g s := by
simpa [MonovaryOn, AntivaryOn] using forall₂_swap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma antivaryOn_inv_right : AntivaryOn f g⁻¹ s ↔ MonovaryOn f g s := by
simpa [MonovaryOn, AntivaryOn] using forall₂_swap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma monovary_inv_right : Monovary f g⁻¹ ↔ Antivary f g := by
simpa [Monovary, Antivary] using forall_swap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma antivary_inv_right : Antivary f g⁻¹ ↔ Monovary f g := by
simpa [Monovary, Antivary] using forall_swap
end
section
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]
[CommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β]
{s : Set ι} {f f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
@[to_additive] lemma monovaryOn_inv : MonovaryOn f⁻¹ g⁻¹ s ↔ MonovaryOn f g s := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma antivaryOn_inv : AntivaryOn f⁻¹ g⁻¹ s ↔ AntivaryOn f g s := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma monovary_inv : Monovary f⁻¹ g⁻¹ ↔ Monovary f g := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma antivary_inv : Antivary f⁻¹ g⁻¹ ↔ Antivary f g := by simp
end
@[to_additive] alias ⟨MonovaryOn.of_inv_left, AntivaryOn.inv_left⟩ := monovaryOn_inv_left
@[to_additive] alias ⟨AntivaryOn.of_inv_left, MonovaryOn.inv_left⟩ := antivaryOn_inv_left
@[to_additive] alias ⟨MonovaryOn.of_inv_right, AntivaryOn.inv_right⟩ := monovaryOn_inv_right
@[to_additive] alias ⟨AntivaryOn.of_inv_right, MonovaryOn.inv_right⟩ := antivaryOn_inv_right
@[to_additive] alias ⟨MonovaryOn.of_inv, MonovaryOn.inv⟩ := monovaryOn_inv
@[to_additive] alias ⟨AntivaryOn.of_inv, AntivaryOn.inv⟩ := antivaryOn_inv
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Monovary.of_inv_left, Antivary.inv_left⟩ := monovary_inv_left
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Antivary.of_inv_left, Monovary.inv_left⟩ := antivary_inv_left
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Monovary.of_inv_right, Antivary.inv_right⟩ := monovary_inv_right
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Antivary.of_inv_right, Monovary.inv_right⟩ := antivary_inv_right
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Monovary.of_inv, Monovary.inv⟩ := monovary_inv
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Antivary.of_inv, Antivary.inv⟩ := antivary_inv
end OrderedCommGroup
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommGroup β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β] {s : Set ι} {f : ι → α}
{g g₁ g₂ : ι → β}
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.mul_right (h₁ : MonovaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f g₂ s) :
MonovaryOn f (g₁ * g₂) s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_mul_lt_mul hij).elim (h₁ hi hj) <| h₂ hi hj
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.mul_right (h₁ : AntivaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f g₂ s) :
AntivaryOn f (g₁ * g₂) s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_mul_lt_mul hij).elim (h₁ hi hj) <| h₂ hi hj
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.div_right (h₁ : MonovaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f g₂ s) :
MonovaryOn f (g₁ / g₂) s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_div_lt_div hij).elim (h₁ hi hj) <| h₂ hj hi
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.div_right (h₁ : AntivaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f g₂ s) :
AntivaryOn f (g₁ / g₂) s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_div_lt_div hij).elim (h₁ hi hj) <| h₂ hj hi
@[to_additive] lemma MonovaryOn.pow_right (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
MonovaryOn f (g ^ n) s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ hfg hi hj <| lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' _ hij
@[to_additive] lemma AntivaryOn.pow_right (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
AntivaryOn f (g ^ n) s := fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ hfg hi hj <| lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' _ hij
@[to_additive] lemma Monovary.mul_right (h₁ : Monovary f g₁) (h₂ : Monovary f g₂) :
Monovary f (g₁ * g₂) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_mul_lt_mul hij).elim (fun h ↦ h₁ h) fun h ↦ h₂ h
@[to_additive] lemma Antivary.mul_right (h₁ : Antivary f g₁) (h₂ : Antivary f g₂) :
Antivary f (g₁ * g₂) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_mul_lt_mul hij).elim (fun h ↦ h₁ h) fun h ↦ h₂ h
@[to_additive] lemma Monovary.div_right (h₁ : Monovary f g₁) (h₂ : Antivary f g₂) :
Monovary f (g₁ / g₂) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_div_lt_div hij).elim (fun h ↦ h₁ h) fun h ↦ h₂ h
@[to_additive] lemma Antivary.div_right (h₁ : Antivary f g₁) (h₂ : Monovary f g₂) :
Antivary f (g₁ / g₂) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ (lt_or_lt_of_div_lt_div hij).elim (fun h ↦ h₁ h) fun h ↦ h₂ h
@[to_additive] lemma Monovary.pow_right (hfg : Monovary f g) (n : ℕ) : Monovary f (g ^ n) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ hfg <| lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' _ hij
@[to_additive] lemma Antivary.pow_right (hfg : Antivary f g) (n : ℕ) : Antivary f (g ^ n) :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ hfg <| lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left' _ hij
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [PartialOrder β]
{s : Set ι} {f f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
lemma MonovaryOn.mul_left₀ (hf₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₁ i) (hf₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₂ i)
(h₁ : MonovaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f₂ g s) : MonovaryOn (f₁ * f₂) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ mul_le_mul (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij) (hf₂ _ hi) (hf₁ _ hj)
lemma AntivaryOn.mul_left₀ (hf₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₁ i) (hf₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₂ i)
(h₁ : AntivaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f₂ g s) : AntivaryOn (f₁ * f₂) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ mul_le_mul (h₁ hi hj hij) (h₂ hi hj hij) (hf₂ _ hj) (hf₁ _ hi)
lemma MonovaryOn.pow_left₀ (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
MonovaryOn (f ^ n) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left₀ (hf _ hi) (hfg hi hj hij) _
lemma AntivaryOn.pow_left₀ (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
AntivaryOn (f ^ n) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left₀ (hf _ hj) (hfg hi hj hij) _
lemma Monovary.mul_left₀ (hf₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (hf₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₁ : Monovary f₁ g) (h₂ : Monovary f₂ g) :
Monovary (f₁ * f₂) g := fun _i _j hij ↦ mul_le_mul (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij) (hf₂ _) (hf₁ _)
lemma Antivary.mul_left₀ (hf₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (hf₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₁ : Antivary f₁ g) (h₂ : Antivary f₂ g) :
Antivary (f₁ * f₂) g := fun _i _j hij ↦ mul_le_mul (h₁ hij) (h₂ hij) (hf₂ _) (hf₁ _)
lemma Monovary.pow_left₀ (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfg : Monovary f g) (n : ℕ) : Monovary (f ^ n) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left₀ (hf _) (hfg hij) _
lemma Antivary.pow_left₀ (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfg : Antivary f g) (n : ℕ) : Antivary (f ^ n) g :=
fun _i _j hij ↦ pow_le_pow_left₀ (hf _) (hfg hij) _
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrder α] [Semiring β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β]
{s : Set ι} {f : ι → α} {g g₁ g₂ : ι → β}
lemma MonovaryOn.mul_right₀ (hg₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g₁ i) (hg₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g₂ i)
(h₁ : MonovaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f g₂ s) : MonovaryOn f (g₁ * g₂) s :=
(h₁.symm.mul_left₀ hg₁ hg₂ h₂.symm).symm
lemma AntivaryOn.mul_right₀ (hg₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g₁ i) (hg₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g₂ i)
(h₁ : AntivaryOn f g₁ s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f g₂ s) : AntivaryOn f (g₁ * g₂) s :=
(h₁.symm.mul_left₀ hg₁ hg₂ h₂.symm).symm
lemma MonovaryOn.pow_right₀ (hg : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g i) (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
MonovaryOn f (g ^ n) s := (hfg.symm.pow_left₀ hg _).symm
lemma AntivaryOn.pow_right₀ (hg : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g i) (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) (n : ℕ) :
AntivaryOn f (g ^ n) s := (hfg.symm.pow_left₀ hg _).symm
lemma Monovary.mul_right₀ (hg₁ : 0 ≤ g₁) (hg₂ : 0 ≤ g₂) (h₁ : Monovary f g₁) (h₂ : Monovary f g₂) :
Monovary f (g₁ * g₂) := (h₁.symm.mul_left₀ hg₁ hg₂ h₂.symm).symm
lemma Antivary.mul_right₀ (hg₁ : 0 ≤ g₁) (hg₂ : 0 ≤ g₂) (h₁ : Antivary f g₁) (h₂ : Antivary f g₂) :
Antivary f (g₁ * g₂) := (h₁.symm.mul_left₀ hg₁ hg₂ h₂.symm).symm
lemma Monovary.pow_right₀ (hg : 0 ≤ g) (hfg : Monovary f g) (n : ℕ) : Monovary f (g ^ n) :=
(hfg.symm.pow_left₀ hg _).symm
lemma Antivary.pow_right₀ (hg : 0 ≤ g) (hfg : Antivary f g) (n : ℕ) : Antivary f (g ^ n) :=
(hfg.symm.pow_left₀ hg _).symm
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemifield
section
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [LinearOrder β]
{s : Set ι} {f f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {g g₁ g₂ : ι → β}
@[simp]
lemma monovaryOn_inv_left₀ (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < f i) : MonovaryOn f⁻¹ g s ↔ AntivaryOn f g s :=
forall₅_congr fun _i hi _j hj _ ↦ inv_le_inv₀ (hf _ hi) (hf _ hj)
@[simp]
lemma antivaryOn_inv_left₀ (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < f i) : AntivaryOn f⁻¹ g s ↔ MonovaryOn f g s :=
forall₅_congr fun _i hi _j hj _ ↦ inv_le_inv₀ (hf _ hj) (hf _ hi)
@[simp] lemma monovary_inv_left₀ (hf : StrongLT 0 f) : Monovary f⁻¹ g ↔ Antivary f g :=
forall₃_congr fun _i _j _ ↦ inv_le_inv₀ (hf _) (hf _)
@[simp] lemma antivary_inv_left₀ (hf : StrongLT 0 f) : Antivary f⁻¹ g ↔ Monovary f g :=
forall₃_congr fun _i _j _ ↦ inv_le_inv₀ (hf _) (hf _)
lemma MonovaryOn.div_left₀ (hf₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₁ i) (hf₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < f₂ i)
(h₁ : MonovaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : AntivaryOn f₂ g s) : MonovaryOn (f₁ / f₂) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ div_le_div₀ (hf₁ _ hj) (h₁ hi hj hij) (hf₂ _ hj) <| h₂ hi hj hij
lemma AntivaryOn.div_left₀ (hf₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f₁ i) (hf₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 < f₂ i)
| (h₁ : AntivaryOn f₁ g s) (h₂ : MonovaryOn f₂ g s) : AntivaryOn (f₁ / f₂) g s :=
fun _i hi _j hj hij ↦ div_le_div₀ (hf₁ _ hi) (h₁ hi hj hij) (hf₂ _ hi) <| h₂ hi hj hij
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monovary.lean | 276 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 686 | 687 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :
Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace IsCauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] {f g : ℕ → β}
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
--@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := by
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij k ik => ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) ?_)
rw [abv_sub abv]; exact hi _ ik
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0
⟨i, fun _ ij _ jk => H _ (le_trans ij jk) _ ij⟩
lemma bounded (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := by
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hf _ zero_lt_one
set R : ℕ → α := @Nat.rec (fun _ => α) (abv (f 0)) fun i c => max c (abv (f i.succ)) with hR
have : ∀ i, ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R i := by
refine Nat.rec (by simp [hR]) ?_
rintro i hi j (rfl | hj)
· simp [R]
· exact (hi j hj).trans (le_max_left _ _)
refine ⟨R i + 1, fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain hji | hij := le_total j i
· exact (this i _ hji).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· simpa using (abv_add abv _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this i _ le_rfl) (h _ hij)
lemma bounded' (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := hf.bounded
⟨max r (x + 1), (lt_add_one x).trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
fun i ↦ (h i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩
lemma const (x : β) : IsCauSeq abv fun _ ↦ x :=
fun ε ε0 ↦ ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero] using ε0⟩
theorem add (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f + g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
lemma mul (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f * g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, _, hF⟩ := hf.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, _, hG⟩ := hg.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun j ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
@[simp] lemma _root_.isCauSeq_neg : IsCauSeq abv (-f) ↔ IsCauSeq abv f := by
simp only [IsCauSeq, Pi.neg_apply, ← neg_sub', abv_neg]
protected alias ⟨of_neg, neg⟩ := isCauSeq_neg
end IsCauSeq
/-- `CauSeq β abv` is the type of `β`-valued Cauchy sequences, with respect to the absolute value
function `abv`. -/
def CauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) : Type _ :=
{ f : ℕ → β // IsCauSeq abv f }
namespace CauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section Ring
variable [Ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : CoeFun (CauSeq β abv) fun _ => ℕ → β :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g := Subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem isCauSeq (f : CauSeq β abv) : IsCauSeq abv f :=
f.2
theorem cauchy (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∀ {ε}, 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := @f.2
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f`, create a Cauchy sequence from a sequence `g` with
the same values as `f`. -/
def ofEq (f : CauSeq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨g, fun ε => by rw [show g = f from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} :
0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} : 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded
theorem bounded' (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded' x
instance : Add (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f + g) = (f : ℕ → β) + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem add_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i :=
rfl
variable (abv) in
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : CauSeq β abv := ⟨fun _ ↦ x, IsCauSeq.const _⟩
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_const (x : β) : (const x : ℕ → β) = Function.const ℕ x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x :=
rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : CauSeq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => congr_arg (fun f : CauSeq β abv => (f : ℕ → β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : CauSeq β abv) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CauSeq β abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : CauSeq β abv) i = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : CauSeq β abv) i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_zero : const 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_one : const 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
rfl
instance : Mul (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f g ↦ ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f * g) = (f : ℕ → β) * g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i :=
rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
rfl
instance : Neg (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f ↦ ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem neg_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i :=
rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ofEq (f + -g) (fun x => f x - g x) fun i => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f - g) = (f : ℕ → β) - g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i :=
rfl
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β]
instance : SMul G (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f => (ofEq (const (a • (1 : β)) * f) (a • (f : ℕ → β))) fun _ => smul_one_mul _ _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(a • f) = a • (f : ℕ → β) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem smul_apply (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (a • f) i = a • f i :=
rfl
theorem const_smul (a : G) (x : β) : const (a • x) = a • const x :=
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower G (CauSeq β abv) (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f g => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc a (f : ℕ → β) (g : ℕ → β)⟩
end SMul
instance addGroup : AddGroup (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instNatCast : NatCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroupWithOne Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl
coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
instance : Pow (CauSeq β abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n =>
(ofEq (npowRec n f) fun i => f i ^ n) <| by induction n <;> simp [*, npowRec, pow_succ]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (f : CauSeq β abv) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (f : ℕ → β) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pow_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (n i : ℕ) : (f ^ n) i = f i ^ n :=
rfl
theorem const_pow (x : β) (n : ℕ) : const (x ^ n) = const x ^ n :=
rfl
instance ring : Ring (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.ring Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl coe_add coe_mul coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) coe_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] : CommRing (CauSeq β abv) :=
{ CauSeq.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b => ext fun n => by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- `LimZero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def LimZero {abv : β → α} (f : CauSeq β abv) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f + g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ <| half_pos ε0) (hg _ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_limZero_right (f : CauSeq β abv) {g} (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 F0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt <| hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem mul_limZero_left {f} (g : CauSeq β abv) (hg : LimZero f) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 G0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _)
rwa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem neg_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) : LimZero (-f) := by
rw [← neg_one_mul f]
exact mul_limZero_right _ hf
theorem sub_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f - g) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_limZero hf (neg_limZero hg)
theorem limZero_sub_rev {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hfg : LimZero (f - g)) : LimZero (g - f) := by
simpa using neg_limZero hfg
theorem zero_limZero : LimZero (0 : CauSeq β abv)
| ε, ε0 => ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_limZero {x : β} : LimZero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun H =>
(abv_eq_zero abv).1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _)) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, hi⟩ := H _ ε0
le_of_lt <| hi _ le_rfl,
fun e => e.symm ▸ zero_limZero⟩
instance equiv : Setoid (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => LimZero (f - g),
⟨fun f => by simp [zero_limZero],
fun f ε hε => by simpa using neg_limZero f ε hε,
fun fg gh => by simpa using add_limZero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem add_equiv_add {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 + g1 ≈ f2 + g2 := by simpa only [← add_sub_add_comm] using add_limZero hf hg
theorem neg_equiv_neg {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f ≈ g) : -f ≈ -g := by
simpa only [neg_sub'] using neg_limZero hf
theorem sub_equiv_sub {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 - g1 ≈ f2 - g2 := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_equiv_add hf (neg_equiv_neg hg)
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ <| half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij k jk => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk))
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem limZero_congr {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : LimZero f ↔ LimZero g :=
⟨fun l => by simpa using add_limZero (Setoid.symm h) l, fun l => by simpa using add_limZero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
by_contra nk
refine hf fun ε ε0 => ?_
simp? [not_forall] at nk says
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ge_iff_le, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp,
not_le] at nk
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0)
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩
refine ⟨j, fun k jk => ?_⟩
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj)
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : CauSeq β abv) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) :
IsCauSeq abv f
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (h _ (half_pos <| half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)
⟨i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl; rw [abv_sub abv] at h₁
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁)
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij))
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this⟩
theorem not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ¬LimZero f := by
intro h
have : LimZero (f - 0) := by simp [h]
exact hf this
theorem mul_equiv_zero (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (g * f) := mul_limZero_right _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (g * f - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_equiv_zero' (g : CauSeq _ abv) {f : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : LimZero (f * g) := mul_limZero_left _ <| by simpa
show LimZero (f * g - 0) by simpa
theorem mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : CauSeq _ abv} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : ¬f * g ≈ 0 :=
fun (this : LimZero (f * g - 0)) => by
have hlz : LimZero (f * g) := by simpa
have hf' : ¬LimZero f := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (f - 0) from hf
have hg' : ¬LimZero g := by simpa using show ¬LimZero (g - 0) from hg
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩
have : 0 < a1 * a2 := mul_pos ha1 ha2
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hlz _ this
let i := max N (max N1 N2)
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _)
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
apply not_le_of_lt hN'
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _)
rw [abv_mul abv]
gcongr
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show LimZero _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_limZero, sub_eq_zero]
theorem mul_equiv_mul {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 * g1 ≈ f2 * g2 := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel]
using add_limZero (mul_limZero_left g1 hf) (mul_limZero_right f2 hg)
theorem smul_equiv_smul {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β] {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (c : G)
(hf : f1 ≈ f2) : c • f1 ≈ c • f2 := by
simpa [const_smul, smul_one_mul _ _] using
mul_equiv_mul (const_equiv.mpr <| Eq.refl <| c • (1 : β)) hf
theorem pow_equiv_pow {f1 f2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (n : ℕ) : f1 ^ n ≈ f2 ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, Setoid.refl]
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ'] using mul_equiv_mul hf ih
end Ring
section IsDomain
variable [Ring β] [IsDomain β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem one_not_equiv_zero : ¬const abv 1 ≈ const abv 0 := fun h =>
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, i ≤ k → abv (1 - 0) < ε := h
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0 :=
le_of_not_gt fun h2 : 0 < abv 1 =>
(Exists.elim (this _ h2)) fun i hi => lt_irrefl (abv 1) <| by simpa using hi _ le_rfl
have h2 : 0 ≤ abv 1 := abv_nonneg abv _
have : abv 1 = 0 := le_antisymm h1 h2
have : (1 : β) = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).mp this
absurd this one_ne_zero
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε
| _, ε0 =>
let ⟨_, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f` with nonzero limit, create a Cauchy sequence with values equal to
the inverses of the values of `f`. -/
def inv (f : CauSeq β abv) (hf : ¬LimZero f) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : ⇑(inv f hf) = (f : ℕ → β)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem inv_apply {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf) : f * inv f hf ≈ 1 := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_limZero hf
⟨i, fun j ij => by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)), abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
const abv x⁻¹ = inv (const abv x) (by rwa [const_limZero]) :=
rfl
end DivisionRing
section Abs
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def Pos (f : CauSeq α abs) : Prop :=
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_limZero_of_pos {f : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → ¬LimZero f
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0)
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ le_rfl
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : Pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨fun ⟨_, K0, _, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ le_rfl), fun h => ⟨x, h, 0, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → LimZero g → Pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩, H =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0))
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, fun j ij => by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h j ij
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this⟩
protected theorem mul_pos {f g : CauSeq α abs} : Pos f → Pos g → Pos (f * g)
| ⟨_, F0, hF⟩, ⟨_, G0, hG⟩ =>
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG
⟨_, mul_pos F0 G0, i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : CauSeq α abs) : Pos f ∨ LimZero f ∨ Pos (-f) := by
rcases Classical.em (LimZero f) with h | h <;> simp [*]
rcases abv_pos_of_not_limZero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp ?_ ?_ <;>
refine fun h => ⟨K, K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩ <;>
have := (hi _ ij).1 <;>
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := hi _ le_rfl
· rwa [abs_of_nonneg] at this
rw [abs_of_nonneg h] at h₁
exact
(le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ <| neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).1)
· rwa [abs_of_nonpos] at this
rw [abs_of_nonpos h] at h₁
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub]
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| h₂ _ ij).2) h₁
instance : LT (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => Pos (g - f)⟩
instance : LE (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g => f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert pos_add_limZero fg (neg_limZero gh) using 1
simp
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h := by
have := pos_add_limZero gh (neg_limZero fg)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
show Pos (h - f) by
convert add_pos fg gh using 1
simp
theorem lt_irrefl {f : CauSeq α abs} : ¬f < f
| h => not_limZero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_limZero])
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (Or.inl ∘ CauSeq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg) (Or.inr ∘ Setoid.trans hfg)
theorem le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : CauSeq α abs} (hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (fun h => Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh)) fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.trans h hgh)
instance : Preorder (CauSeq α abs) where
lt := (· < ·)
le f g := f < g ∨ f ≈ g
le_refl _ := Or.inr (Setoid.refl _)
le_trans _ _ _ fg gh :=
match fg, gh with
| Or.inl fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_trans fg gh
| Or.inl fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inl gh => Or.inl <| lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| Or.inr fg, Or.inr gh => Or.inr <| Setoid.trans fg gh
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Or.inl h, not_or_intro (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_limZero_of_pos h)⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₁.resolve_right (mt (fun h => Or.inr (Setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩
theorem le_antisymm {f g : CauSeq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right fun h =>
h.imp (fun h => Setoid.symm h) fun h => by rwa [neg_sub] at h
theorem le_total (f g : CauSeq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or_assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right Or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show Pos _ ↔ _ by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq]; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
theorem le_of_exists {f g : CauSeq α abs} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h
(or_assoc.2 (CauSeq.lt_total f g)).elim id fun hgf =>
False.elim
(let ⟨_, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _)))))
theorem exists_gt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, fun i _ => by
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : CauSeq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt
⟨-a, show Pos _ by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_sup_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊔ a₂ - b₁ ⊔ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
-- so named to match `rat_add_continuous_lemma`
theorem rat_inf_continuous_lemma {ε : α} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
abs (a₁ - b₁) < ε → abs (a₂ - b₂) < ε → abs (a₁ ⊓ a₂ - b₁ ⊓ b₂) < ε := fun h₁ h₂ =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _).trans_lt (max_lt h₁ h₂)
instance : Max (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_sup_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
instance : Min (CauSeq α abs) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊓ g, fun _ ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ ε0) (g.cauchy₃ ε0)).imp fun _ H _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
rat_inf_continuous_lemma (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊔ g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (f g : CauSeq α abs) : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = (f : ℕ → α) ⊓ g :=
rfl
theorem sup_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊔ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_sup_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.1), sup_lt_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.2, H₂.2⟩⟩
theorem inf_limZero {f g : CauSeq α abs} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f ⊓ g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ ε0) (hg _ ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
rw [abs_lt] at H₁ H₂ ⊢
exact ⟨lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨H₁.1, H₂.1⟩, inf_lt_iff.mpr (Or.inl H₁.2)⟩
theorem sup_equiv_sup {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊔ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊔ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_max_sub_max_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
theorem inf_equiv_inf {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a₁ ≈ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≈ b₂) :
a₁ ⊓ b₁ ≈ a₂ ⊓ b₂ := by
intro ε ε0
obtain ⟨ai, hai⟩ := ha ε ε0
obtain ⟨bi, hbi⟩ := hb ε ε0
exact
⟨ai ⊔ bi, fun i hi =>
(abs_min_sub_min_le_max (a₁ i) (b₁ i) (a₂ i) (b₂ i)).trans_lt
(max_lt (hai i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hbi i (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2))⟩
protected theorem sup_lt {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a < c) (hb : b < c) : a ⊔ b < c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εa, εa0, ia, ha⟩, ⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩⟩ := ha, hb
refine ⟨εa ⊓ εb, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εa0, εb0⟩, ia ⊔ ib, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (ha _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_left _ _ _)
protected theorem lt_inf {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (hb : a < b) (hc : a < c) : a < b ⊓ c := by
obtain ⟨⟨εb, εb0, ib, hb⟩, ⟨εc, εc0, ic, hc⟩⟩ := hb, hc
refine ⟨εb ⊓ εc, lt_inf_iff.mpr ⟨εb0, εc0⟩, ib ⊔ ic, fun i hi => ?_⟩
have := min_le_min (hb _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).1) (hc _ (sup_le_iff.mp hi).2)
exact this.trans_eq (min_sub_sub_right _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem sup_idem (a : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ a = a := Subtype.ext (sup_idem _)
@[simp]
protected theorem inf_idem (a : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ a = a := Subtype.ext (inf_idem _)
protected theorem sup_comm (a b : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a := Subtype.ext (sup_comm _ _)
protected theorem inf_comm (a b : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a := Subtype.ext (inf_comm _ _)
protected theorem sup_eq_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b ≈ b := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0 : _ < _, i, h⟩ | h := h
· intro _ _
refine ⟨i, fun j hj => ?_⟩
dsimp
rw [← max_sub_sub_right]
rwa [sub_self, max_eq_right, abs_zero]
rw [sub_nonpos, ← sub_nonneg]
exact ε0.le.trans (h _ hj)
· refine Setoid.trans (sup_equiv_sup h (Setoid.refl _)) ?_
rw [CauSeq.sup_idem]
protected theorem inf_eq_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⊓ b ≈ b := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0 : _ < _, i, h⟩ | h := h
· intro _ _
refine ⟨i, fun j hj => ?_⟩
dsimp
rw [← min_sub_sub_right]
rwa [sub_self, min_eq_right, abs_zero]
exact ε0.le.trans (h _ hj)
· refine Setoid.trans (inf_equiv_inf (Setoid.symm h) (Setoid.refl _)) ?_
rw [CauSeq.inf_idem]
protected theorem sup_eq_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⊔ b ≈ a := by
simpa only [CauSeq.sup_comm] using CauSeq.sup_eq_right h
protected theorem inf_eq_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊓ b ≈ a := by
simpa only [CauSeq.inf_comm] using CauSeq.inf_eq_right h
protected theorem le_sup_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => le_sup_left⟩
protected theorem inf_le_left {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ⊓ b ≤ a :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => inf_le_left⟩
protected theorem le_sup_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} : b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => le_sup_right⟩
protected theorem inf_le_right {a b : CauSeq α abs} : a ⊓ b ≤ b :=
le_of_exists ⟨0, fun _ _ => inf_le_right⟩
protected theorem sup_le {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (ha : a ≤ c) (hb : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c := by
obtain ha | ha := ha
· obtain hb | hb := hb
· exact Or.inl (CauSeq.sup_lt ha hb)
· replace ha := le_of_le_of_eq ha.le (Setoid.symm hb)
refine le_of_le_of_eq (Or.inr ?_) hb
exact CauSeq.sup_eq_right ha
· replace hb := le_of_le_of_eq hb (Setoid.symm ha)
refine le_of_le_of_eq (Or.inr ?_) ha
exact CauSeq.sup_eq_left hb
protected theorem le_inf {a b c : CauSeq α abs} (hb : a ≤ b) (hc : a ≤ c) : a ≤ b ⊓ c := by
obtain hb | hb := hb
· obtain hc | hc := hc
· exact Or.inl (CauSeq.lt_inf hb hc)
· replace hb := le_of_eq_of_le (Setoid.symm hc) hb.le
refine le_of_eq_of_le hc (Or.inr ?_)
exact Setoid.symm (CauSeq.inf_eq_right hb)
· replace hc := le_of_eq_of_le (Setoid.symm hb) hc
refine le_of_eq_of_le hb (Or.inr ?_)
exact Setoid.symm (CauSeq.inf_eq_left hc)
/-! Note that `DistribLattice (CauSeq α abs)` is not true because there is no `PartialOrder`. -/
protected theorem sup_inf_distrib_left (a b c : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊔ b ⊓ c = (a ⊔ b) ⊓ (a ⊔ c) :=
ext fun _ ↦ max_min_distrib_left _ _ _
protected theorem sup_inf_distrib_right (a b c : CauSeq α abs) : a ⊓ b ⊔ c = (a ⊔ c) ⊓ (b ⊔ c) :=
ext fun _ ↦ max_min_distrib_right _ _ _
end Abs
end CauSeq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 933 | 942 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.CompletelyRegular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
/-!
# Dirac deltas as probability measures and embedding of a space into probability measures on it
## Main definitions
* `diracProba`: The Dirac delta mass at a point as a probability measure.
## Main results
* `isEmbedding_diracProba`: If `X` is a completely regular T0 space with its Borel sigma algebra,
then the mapping that takes a point `x : X` to the delta-measure `diracProba x` is an embedding
`X ↪ ProbabilityMeasure X`.
## Tags
probability measure, Dirac delta, embedding
-/
open Topology Metric Filter Set ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
lemma CompletelyRegularSpace.exists_BCNN {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [CompletelyRegularSpace X]
{K : Set X} (K_closed : IsClosed K) {x : X} (x_notin_K : x ∉ K) :
∃ (f : X →ᵇ ℝ≥0), f x = 1 ∧ (∀ y ∈ K, f y = 0) := by
obtain ⟨g, g_cont, gx_zero, g_one_on_K⟩ :=
CompletelyRegularSpace.completely_regular x K K_closed x_notin_K
have g_bdd : ∀ x y, dist (Real.toNNReal (g x)) (Real.toNNReal (g y)) ≤ 1 := by
refine fun x y ↦ ((Real.lipschitzWith_toNNReal).dist_le_mul (g x) (g y)).trans ?_
simpa using Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 (g x).prop (g y).prop
set g' := BoundedContinuousFunction.mkOfBound
⟨fun x ↦ Real.toNNReal (g x), continuous_real_toNNReal.comp g_cont.subtype_val⟩ 1 g_bdd
set f := 1 - g'
refine ⟨f, by simp [f, g', gx_zero], fun y y_in_K ↦ by simp [f, g', g_one_on_K y_in_K, tsub_self]⟩
namespace MeasureTheory
section embed_to_probabilityMeasure
variable {X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X]
/-- The Dirac delta mass at a point `x : X` as a `ProbabilityMeasure`. -/
noncomputable def diracProba (x : X) : ProbabilityMeasure X :=
⟨Measure.dirac x, Measure.dirac.isProbabilityMeasure⟩
/-- The assignment `x ↦ diracProba x` is injective if all singletons are measurable. -/
lemma injective_diracProba {X : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace.SeparatesPoints X] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : X) ↦ diracProba x) := by
intro x y x_eq_y
rw [← dirac_eq_dirac_iff]
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff] at x_eq_y
@[simp] lemma diracProba_toMeasure_apply' (x : X) {A : Set X} (A_mble : MeasurableSet A) :
(diracProba x).toMeasure A = A.indicator 1 x := Measure.dirac_apply' x A_mble
@[simp] lemma diracProba_toMeasure_apply_of_mem {x : X} {A : Set X} (x_in_A : x ∈ A) :
(diracProba x).toMeasure A = 1 := Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem x_in_A
@[simp] lemma diracProba_toMeasure_apply [MeasurableSingletonClass X] (x : X) (A : Set X) :
(diracProba x).toMeasure A = A.indicator 1 x := Measure.dirac_apply _ _
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
/-- The assignment `x ↦ diracProba x` is continuous `X → ProbabilityMeasure X`. -/
lemma continuous_diracProba : Continuous (fun (x : X) ↦ diracProba x) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
apply fun x ↦ ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mpr fun f ↦ ?_
have f_mble : Measurable (fun X ↦ (f X : ℝ≥0∞)) :=
measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal_iff.mpr f.continuous.measurable
simp only [diracProba, ProbabilityMeasure.coe_mk, lintegral_dirac' _ f_mble]
exact (ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp f.continuous).continuousAt
/-- In a T0 topological space equipped with a sigma algebra which contains all open sets,
the assignment `x ↦ diracProba x` is injective. -/
lemma injective_diracProba_of_T0 [T0Space X] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : X) ↦ diracProba x) := by
intro x y δx_eq_δy
by_contra x_ne_y
exact dirac_ne_dirac x_ne_y <| congr_arg Subtype.val δx_eq_δy
lemma not_tendsto_diracProba_of_not_tendsto [CompletelyRegularSpace X] {x : X} (L : Filter X)
(h : ¬ Tendsto id L (𝓝 x)) :
¬ Tendsto diracProba L (𝓝 (diracProba x)) := by
obtain ⟨U, U_nhd, hU⟩ : ∃ U, U ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ ∃ᶠ x in L, x ∉ U := by
by_contra! con
apply h
intro U U_nhd
simpa only [not_frequently, not_not] using con U U_nhd
have Uint_nhd : interior U ∈ 𝓝 x := by simpa only [interior_mem_nhds] using U_nhd
obtain ⟨f, fx_eq_one, f_vanishes_outside⟩ :=
CompletelyRegularSpace.exists_BCNN isOpen_interior.isClosed_compl
(by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_not] using mem_of_mem_nhds Uint_nhd)
rw [ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto, not_forall]
use f
simp only [diracProba, ProbabilityMeasure.coe_mk, fx_eq_one,
lintegral_dirac' _ (measurable_coe_nnreal_ennreal_iff.mpr f.continuous.measurable)]
apply not_tendsto_iff_exists_frequently_nmem.mpr
refine ⟨Ioi 0, Ioi_mem_nhds (by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, zero_lt_one]),
hU.mp (Eventually.of_forall ?_)⟩
intro x x_notin_U
rw [f_vanishes_outside x
(compl_subset_compl.mpr (show interior U ⊆ U from interior_subset) x_notin_U)]
simp only [ENNReal.coe_zero, mem_Ioi, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true]
| lemma tendsto_diracProba_iff_tendsto [CompletelyRegularSpace X] {x : X} (L : Filter X) :
Tendsto diracProba L (𝓝 (diracProba x)) ↔ Tendsto id L (𝓝 x) := by
constructor
· contrapose
exact not_tendsto_diracProba_of_not_tendsto L
· intro h
have aux := (@continuous_diracProba X _ _ _).continuousAt (x := x)
simp only [ContinuousAt] at aux
exact aux.comp h
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/DiracProba.lean | 110 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
| Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 114 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Chebyshev
/-!
# Dickson polynomials
The (generalised) Dickson polynomials are a family of polynomials indexed by `ℕ × ℕ`,
with coefficients in a commutative ring `R` depending on an element `a∈R`. More precisely, the
they satisfy the recursion `dickson k a (n + 2) = X * (dickson k a n + 1) - a * (dickson k a n)`
with starting values `dickson k a 0 = 3 - k` and `dickson k a 1 = X`. In the literature,
`dickson k a n` is called the `n`-th Dickson polynomial of the `k`-th kind associated to the
parameter `a : R`. They are closely related to the Chebyshev polynomials in the case that `a=1`.
When `a=0` they are just the family of monomials `X ^ n`.
## Main definition
* `Polynomial.dickson`: the generalised Dickson polynomials.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.dickson_one_one_mul`, the `(m * n)`-th Dickson polynomial of the first kind for
parameter `1 : R` is the composition of the `m`-th and `n`-th Dickson polynomials of the first
kind for `1 : R`.
* `Polynomial.dickson_one_one_charP`, for a prime number `p`, the `p`-th Dickson polynomial of the
first kind associated to parameter `1 : R` is congruent to `X ^ p` modulo `p`.
## References
* [R. Lidl, G. L. Mullen and G. Turnwald, _Dickson polynomials_][MR1237403]
## TODO
* Redefine `dickson` in terms of `LinearRecurrence`.
* Show that `dickson 2 1` is equal to the characteristic polynomial of the adjacency matrix of a
type A Dynkin diagram.
* Prove that the adjacency matrices of simply laced Dynkin diagrams are precisely the adjacency
matrices of simple connected graphs which annihilate `dickson 2 1`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (k : ℕ) (a : R)
/-- `dickson` is the `n`-th (generalised) Dickson polynomial of the `k`-th kind associated to the
element `a ∈ R`. -/
noncomputable def dickson : ℕ → R[X]
| 0 => 3 - k
| 1 => X
| n + 2 => X * dickson (n + 1) - C a * dickson n
@[simp]
theorem dickson_zero : dickson k a 0 = 3 - k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dickson_one : dickson k a 1 = X :=
rfl
theorem dickson_two : dickson k a 2 = X ^ 2 - C a * (3 - k : R[X]) := by
simp only [dickson, sq]
@[simp]
theorem dickson_add_two (n : ℕ) :
dickson k a (n + 2) = X * dickson k a (n + 1) - C a * dickson k a n := by rw [dickson]
theorem dickson_of_two_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) :
dickson k a n = X * dickson k a (n - 1) - C a * dickson k a (n - 2) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm]
exact dickson_add_two k a n
variable {k a}
theorem map_dickson (f : R →+* S) : ∀ n : ℕ, map f (dickson k a n) = dickson k (f a) n
| 0 => by
simp_rw [dickson_zero, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.map_ofNat]
| 1 => by simp only [dickson_one, map_X]
| n + 2 => by
simp only [dickson_add_two, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, map_X, map_C]
rw [map_dickson f n, map_dickson f (n + 1)]
| @[simp]
theorem dickson_two_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, dickson 2 (0 : R) n = X ^ n
| 0 => by
simp only [dickson_zero, pow_zero]
norm_num
| 1 => by simp only [dickson_one, pow_one]
| n + 2 => by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Dickson.lean | 95 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder
/-!
# Extra lemmas about intervals
This file contains lemmas about intervals that cannot be included into `Order.Interval.Set.Basic`
because this would create an `import` cycle. Namely, lemmas in this file can use definitions
from `Data.Set.Lattice`, including `Disjoint`.
We consider various intersections and unions of half infinite intervals.
-/
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort u} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
open Set
open OrderDual (toDual)
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioi b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt hb).not_le ha
@[simp]
theorem Iio_disjoint_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iio a) (Ici b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt' ha).not_le hb
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioi h).mono le_rfl Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioc h).mono Ioc_subset_Iic_self le_rfl
@[deprecated Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le (since := "2025-03-04")]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioc le_rfl).mono Ioc_subset_Iic_self le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_same : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hab hbc => hab.2.not_le hbc.1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_disjoint_Iic : Disjoint (Ici a) (Iic b) ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ici_inter_Iic, Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ici : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ici b) ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
disjoint_comm.trans Ici_disjoint_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr (fun _ hx hy ↦ (hx.2.trans h).not_lt hy)
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi b) :=
Ioc_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iic : ⋃ a : α, Iic a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ici : ⋃ a : α, Ici a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Icc a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioc a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Icc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ico a b = Iio b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Iio a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_gt
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Ioi a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_lt
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ico a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioo a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioo a b = Iio b := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
@[simp]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico : Disjoint (Ico a₁ a₂) (Ico b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ico_inter_Ico, Ico_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
@[simp]
| theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc : Disjoint (Ioc a₁ a₂) (Ioc b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
have h : _ ↔ min (toDual a₁) (toDual b₁) ≤ max (toDual a₂) (toDual b₂) := Ico_disjoint_Ico
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Disjoint.lean | 132 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
/-!
# Iterations of a function
In this file we prove simple properties of `Nat.iterate f n` a.k.a. `f^[n]`:
* `iterate_zero`, `iterate_succ`, `iterate_succ'`, `iterate_add`, `iterate_mul`:
formulas for `f^[0]`, `f^[n+1]` (two versions), `f^[n+m]`, and `f^[n*m]`;
* `iterate_id` : `id^[n]=id`;
* `Injective.iterate`, `Surjective.iterate`, `Bijective.iterate` :
iterates of an injective/surjective/bijective function belong to the same class;
* `LeftInverse.iterate`, `RightInverse.iterate`, `Commute.iterate_left`, `Commute.iterate_right`,
`Commute.iterate_iterate`:
some properties of pairs of functions survive under iterations
* `iterate_fixed`, `Function.Semiconj.iterate_*`, `Function.Semiconj₂.iterate`:
if `f` fixes a point (resp., semiconjugates unary/binary operations), then so does `f^[n]`.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- Iterate a function. -/
def Nat.iterate {α : Sort u} (op : α → α) : ℕ → α → α
| 0, a => a
| succ k, a => iterate op k (op a)
@[inherit_doc Nat.iterate]
notation:max f "^["n"]" => Nat.iterate f n
namespace Function
open Function (Commute)
variable (f : α → α)
@[simp]
theorem iterate_zero : f^[0] = id :=
rfl
theorem iterate_zero_apply (x : α) : f^[0] x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = f^[n] ∘ f :=
rfl
theorem iterate_succ_apply (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = f^[n] (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (n : ℕ) : (id : α → α)^[n] = id :=
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ihn ↦ by rw [iterate_succ, ihn, id_comp]
theorem iterate_add (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, f^[m + n] = f^[m] ∘ f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| Nat.succ n => by rw [Nat.add_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_succ, iterate_add m n]; rfl
theorem iterate_add_apply (m n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[m + n] x = f^[m] (f^[n] x) := by
rw [iterate_add f m n]
rfl
-- can be proved by simp but this is shorter and more natural
@[simp high]
theorem iterate_one : f^[1] = f :=
funext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem iterate_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n, f^[m * n] = f^[m]^[n]
| 0 => by simp only [Nat.mul_zero, iterate_zero]
| n + 1 => by simp only [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one, iterate_one, iterate_add, iterate_mul m n]
variable {f}
theorem iterate_fixed {x} (h : f x = x) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] x = x :=
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ihn ↦ by rw [iterate_succ_apply, h, ihn]
theorem Injective.iterate (Hinj : Injective f) (n : ℕ) : Injective f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n injective_id fun _ ihn ↦ ihn.comp Hinj
theorem Surjective.iterate (Hsurj : Surjective f) (n : ℕ) : Surjective f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n surjective_id fun _ ihn ↦ ihn.comp Hsurj
theorem Bijective.iterate (Hbij : Bijective f) (n : ℕ) : Bijective f^[n] :=
⟨Hbij.1.iterate n, Hbij.2.iterate n⟩
namespace Semiconj
theorem iterate_right {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β} (h : Semiconj f ga gb) (n : ℕ) :
Semiconj f ga^[n] gb^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n id_right fun _ ihn ↦ ihn.comp_right h
theorem iterate_left {g : ℕ → α → α} (H : ∀ n, Semiconj f (g n) (g <| n + 1)) (n k : ℕ) :
Semiconj f^[n] (g k) (g <| n + k) := by
induction n generalizing k with
| zero =>
rw [Nat.zero_add]
exact id_left
| succ n ihn =>
rw [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
exact (H k).trans (ihn (k + 1))
end Semiconj
namespace Commute
variable {g : α → α}
theorem iterate_right (h : Commute f g) (n : ℕ) : Commute f g^[n] :=
Semiconj.iterate_right h n
theorem iterate_left (h : Commute f g) (n : ℕ) : Commute f^[n] g :=
(h.symm.iterate_right n).symm
theorem iterate_iterate (h : Commute f g) (m n : ℕ) : Commute f^[m] g^[n] :=
(h.iterate_left m).iterate_right n
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq (h : Commute f g) (n : ℕ) {x} (hx : f x = g x) :
f^[n] x = g^[n] x :=
Nat.recOn n rfl fun n ihn ↦ by
simp only [iterate_succ_apply, hx, (h.iterate_left n).eq, ihn, ((refl g).iterate_right n).eq]
theorem comp_iterate (h : Commute f g) (n : ℕ) : (f ∘ g)^[n] = f^[n] ∘ g^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn =>
funext x
simp only [ihn, (h.iterate_right n).eq, iterate_succ, comp_apply]
variable (f)
theorem iterate_self (n : ℕ) : Commute f^[n] f :=
(refl f).iterate_left n
theorem self_iterate (n : ℕ) : Commute f f^[n] :=
(refl f).iterate_right n
theorem iterate_iterate_self (m n : ℕ) : Commute f^[m] f^[n] :=
(refl f).iterate_iterate m n
end Commute
theorem Semiconj₂.iterate {f : α → α} {op : α → α → α} (hf : Semiconj₂ f op op) (n : ℕ) :
Semiconj₂ f^[n] op op :=
Nat.recOn n (Semiconj₂.id_left op) fun _ ihn ↦ ihn.comp hf
variable (f)
theorem iterate_succ' (n : ℕ) : f^[n.succ] = f ∘ f^[n] := by
rw [iterate_succ, (Commute.self_iterate f n).comp_eq]
theorem iterate_succ_apply' (n : ℕ) (x : α) : f^[n.succ] x = f (f^[n] x) := by
rw [iterate_succ']
rfl
theorem iterate_pred_comp_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : f^[n.pred] ∘ f = f^[n] := by
rw [← iterate_succ, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
theorem comp_iterate_pred_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : f ∘ f^[n.pred] = f^[n] := by
rw [← iterate_succ', Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hn]
/-- A recursor for the iterate of a function. -/
def Iterate.rec (p : α → Sort*) {f : α → α} (h : ∀ a, p a → p (f a)) {a : α} (ha : p a) (n : ℕ) :
p (f^[n] a) :=
match n with
| 0 => ha
| m+1 => Iterate.rec p h (h _ ha) m
theorem Iterate.rec_zero (p : α → Sort*) {f : α → α} (h : ∀ a, p a → p (f a)) {a : α} (ha : p a) :
Iterate.rec p h ha 0 = ha :=
rfl
variable {f} {m n : ℕ} {a : α}
theorem LeftInverse.iterate {g : α → α} (hg : LeftInverse g f) (n : ℕ) :
LeftInverse g^[n] f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n (fun _ ↦ rfl) fun n ihn ↦ by
rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ]
exact ihn.comp hg
theorem RightInverse.iterate {g : α → α} (hg : RightInverse g f) (n : ℕ) :
RightInverse g^[n] f^[n] :=
LeftInverse.iterate hg n
theorem iterate_comm (f : α → α) (m n : ℕ) : f^[n]^[m] = f^[m]^[n] :=
(iterate_mul _ _ _).symm.trans (Eq.trans (by rw [Nat.mul_comm]) (iterate_mul _ _ _))
theorem iterate_commute (m n : ℕ) : Commute (fun f : α → α ↦ f^[m]) fun f ↦ f^[n] :=
fun f ↦ iterate_comm f m n
lemma iterate_add_eq_iterate (hf : Injective f) : f^[m + n] a = f^[n] a ↔ f^[m] a = a :=
Iff.trans (by rw [← iterate_add_apply, Nat.add_comm]) (hf.iterate n).eq_iff
alias ⟨iterate_cancel_of_add, _⟩ := iterate_add_eq_iterate
lemma iterate_cancel (hf : Injective f) (ha : f^[m] a = f^[n] a) : f^[m - n] a = a := by
obtain h | h := Nat.le_total m n
{ simp [Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h] }
{ exact iterate_cancel_of_add hf (by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel h]) }
theorem involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id {α} {f : α → α} : Involutive f ↔ f^[2] = id :=
funext_iff.symm
end Function
namespace List
open Function
theorem foldl_const (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List β) :
l.foldl (fun b _ ↦ f b) a = f^[l.length] a := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons b l H => rw [length_cons, foldl, iterate_succ_apply, H]
theorem foldr_const (f : β → β) (b : β) : ∀ l : List α, l.foldr (fun _ ↦ f) b = f^[l.length] b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [length_cons, foldr, foldr_const f b l, iterate_succ_apply']
end List
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Iterate.lean | 239 | 240 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules.
Given a fixed finite spanning set `b : ι → M` of an `R`-module `M`, we say that a matrix `M`
represents an endomorphism `f : M →ₗ[R] M` if the matrix as an endomorphism of `ι → R` commutes
with `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by `b`.
We show that every endomorphism has a matrix representation, and if `f.range ≤ I • ⊤` for some
ideal `I`, we may furthermore obtain a matrix representation whose entries fall in `I`.
This is used to conclude the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings.
-/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (b : ι → M)
open Polynomial Matrix
/-- The composition of a matrix (as an endomorphism of `ι → R`) with the projection
`(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromMatrix [DecidableEq ι] : Matrix ι ι R →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)).comp algEquivMatrix'.symm.toLinearMap
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A w = Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (j : ι) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A (Pi.single j 1) = ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i := by
rw [PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single]
simp_rw [MulOpposite.op_one, one_smul, transpose_apply]
/-- The endomorphisms of `M` acts on `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`, and takes the projection
to a `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromEnd : Module.End R M →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
LinearMap.lcomp _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply (f : Module.End R M) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f w = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (f : Module.End R M) (i : ι) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f (Pi.single i 1) = f (b i) := by
rw [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply_single, one_smul]
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_injective (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤) :
Function.Injective (PiToModule.fromEnd R b) := by
intro x y e
ext m
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : m ∈ LinearMap.range (Fintype.linearCombination R b) := by
rw [(Fintype.range_linearCombination R b).trans hb]
exact Submodule.mem_top
exact (LinearMap.congr_fun e m :)
section
variable {R} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- We say that a matrix represents an endomorphism of `M` if the matrix acting on `ι → R` is
equal to `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by a fixed (spanning) set. -/
def Matrix.Represents (A : Matrix ι ι R) (f : Module.End R M) : Prop :=
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A = PiToModule.fromEnd R b f
variable {b}
theorem Matrix.Represents.congr_fun {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(x) : Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
LinearMap.congr_fun h x
theorem Matrix.represents_iff {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔
∀ x, Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
⟨fun e x => e.congr_fun x, fun H => LinearMap.ext fun x => H x⟩
theorem Matrix.represents_iff' {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ j, ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i = f (b j) := by
constructor
· intro h i
have := LinearMap.congr_fun h (Pi.single i 1)
rwa [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one, PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one] at this
· intro h
ext
simp_rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_single, PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one,
PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one]
apply h
theorem Matrix.Represents.mul {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A * A').Represents b (f * f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_mul]
ext
dsimp [PiToModule.fromEnd]
rw [← h'.congr_fun, ← h.congr_fun]
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.one : (1 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 1 := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_one]
ext
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.add {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A + A').Represents b (f + f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h h' ⊢; rw [map_add, map_add, h, h']
theorem Matrix.Represents.zero : (0 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 0 := by
delta Matrix.Represents
rw [map_zero, map_zero]
theorem Matrix.Represents.smul {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(r : R) : (r • A).Represents b (r • f) := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h ⊢
rw [map_smul, map_smul, h]
theorem Matrix.Represents.algebraMap (r : R) :
(algebraMap _ (Matrix ι ι R) r).Represents b (algebraMap _ (Module.End R M) r) := by
simpa only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using Matrix.Represents.one.smul r
theorem Matrix.Represents.eq (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤)
{A : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : A.Represents b f') : f = f' :=
PiToModule.fromEnd_injective R b hb (h.symm.trans h')
variable (b R)
/-- The subalgebra of `Matrix ι ι R` that consists of matrices that actually represent
endomorphisms on `M`. -/
def Matrix.isRepresentation : Subalgebra R (Matrix ι ι R) where
carrier := { A | ∃ f : Module.End R M, A.Represents b f }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ * f₂, e₁.mul e₂⟩
one_mem' := ⟨1, Matrix.Represents.one⟩
add_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ + f₂, e₁.add e₂⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨0, Matrix.Represents.zero⟩
algebraMap_mem' r := ⟨algebraMap _ _ r, .algebraMap _⟩
variable (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤)
include hb
/-- The map sending a matrix to the endomorphism it represents. This is an `R`-algebra morphism. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd :
Matrix.isRepresentation R b →ₐ[R] Module.End R M where
toFun A := A.2.choose
map_one' := (1 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.one
map_mul' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ * A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.mul A₂.2.choose_spec)
map_zero' := (0 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.zero
map_add' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ + A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.add A₂.2.choose_spec)
commutes' r :=
(algebraMap _ (Matrix.isRepresentation R b) r).2.choose_spec.eq hb (.algebraMap r)
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b) :
(A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A) :=
A.2.choose_spec
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b)
{f : Module.End R M} (h : (A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b f) :
Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A = f :=
A.2.choose_spec.eq hb h
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal (f : Module.End R M) (I : Ideal R)
(hI : LinearMap.range f ≤ I • ⊤) :
∃ M, Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb M = f ∧ ∀ i j, M.1 i j ∈ I := by
have : ∀ x, f x ∈ LinearMap.range (Ideal.finsuppTotal ι M I b) := by
rw [Ideal.range_finsuppTotal, hb]
exact fun x => hI (LinearMap.mem_range_self f x)
choose bM' hbM' using this
let A : Matrix ι ι R := fun i j => bM' (b j) i
have : A.Represents b f := by
rw [Matrix.represents_iff']
dsimp [A]
intro j
specialize hbM' (b j)
rwa [Ideal.finsuppTotal_apply_eq_of_fintype] at hbM'
exact
⟨⟨A, f, this⟩, Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents R b hb ⟨A, f, this⟩ this,
fun i j => (bM' (b j) i).prop⟩
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_surjective :
Function.Surjective (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb) := by
intro f
obtain ⟨M, e, -⟩ := Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal R b hb f ⊤ (by simp)
exact ⟨M, e⟩
end
/-- The **Cayley-Hamilton Theorem** for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings states that for each
`R`-endomorphism `φ` of an `R`-module `M` such that `φ(M) ≤ I • M` for some ideal `I`, there
exists some `n` and some `aᵢ ∈ Iⁱ` such that `φⁿ + a₁ φⁿ⁻¹ + ⋯ + aₙ = 0`.
This is the version found in Eisenbud 4.3, which is slightly weaker than Matsumura 2.1
(this lacks the constraint on `n`), and is slightly stronger than Atiyah-Macdonald 2.4.
-/
theorem LinearMap.exists_monic_and_coeff_mem_pow_and_aeval_eq_zero_of_range_le_smul
[Module.Finite R M] (f : Module.End R M) (I : Ideal R) (hI : LinearMap.range f ≤ I • ⊤) :
∃ p : R[X], p.Monic ∧ (∀ k, p.coeff k ∈ I ^ (p.natDegree - k)) ∧ Polynomial.aeval f p = 0 := by
classical
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· exact ⟨0, Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton _, by simp⟩
obtain ⟨s : Finset M, hs : Submodule.span R (s : Set M) = ⊤⟩ :=
Module.Finite.fg_top (R := R) (M := M)
| obtain ⟨A, rfl, h⟩ :=
Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal R ((↑) : s → M)
(by rw [Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]) f I hI
refine ⟨A.1.charpoly, A.1.charpoly_monic, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [A.1.charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/LinearMap.lean | 211 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
| val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 94 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker, Devon Tuma, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
/-!
# Uniform distributions and probability mass functions
This file defines two related notions of uniform distributions, which will be unified in the future.
# Uniform distributions
Defines the uniform distribution for any set with finite measure.
## Main definitions
* `IsUniform X s ℙ μ` : A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` under `ℙ` if the
push-forward measure agrees with the rescaled restricted measure `μ`.
# Uniform probability mass functions
This file defines a number of uniform `PMF` distributions from various inputs,
uniformly drawing from the corresponding object.
## Main definitions
`PMF.uniformOfFinset` gives each element in the set equal probability,
with `0` probability for elements not in the set.
`PMF.uniformOfFintype` gives all elements equal probability,
equal to the inverse of the size of the `Fintype`.
`PMF.ofMultiset` draws randomly from the given `Multiset`, treating duplicate values as distinct.
Each probability is given by the count of the element divided by the size of the `Multiset`
## TODO
* Refactor the `PMF` definitions to come from a `uniformMeasure` on a `Finset`/`Fintype`/`Multiset`.
-/
open scoped Finset MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
/-- A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` if its push-forward measure is
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem isProbabilityMeasure {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ :=
⟨by
have : X ⁻¹' Set.univ = Set.univ := Set.preimage_univ
rw [← this, hu.measure_preimage hns hnt MeasurableSet.univ, Set.inter_univ,
ENNReal.div_self hns hnt]⟩
theorem toMeasurable_iff {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ ↔ IsUniform X s ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
protected theorem toMeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform at *
rwa [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
theorem hasPDF {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
let t := toMeasurable μ s
apply hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) (t.indicator ((μ t)⁻¹ • 1)) <|
(measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ t)⁻¹).indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
rw [hu, withDensity_indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s), withDensity_smul _ measurable_one,
withDensity_one, restrict_toMeasurable hnt, measure_toMeasurable, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
theorem pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E}
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) (hμs : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = ∞) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases hμs with H|H
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_zero, restrict_eq_zero.mpr H,
smul_zero] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_top, zero_smul] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
theorem pdf_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) := by
by_cases hnt : μ s = ∞
· simp [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inr hnt), hnt]
by_cases hns : μ s = 0
· filter_upwards [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.mp hns,
pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inl hns)] with x hx h'x
simp [hx, h'x, hns]
have : HasPDF X ℙ μ := hasPDF hns hnt hu
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hns hnt hu
apply (eq_of_map_eq_withDensity _ _).mp
· rw [hu, withDensity_indicator hms, withDensity_smul _ measurable_one, withDensity_one,
ProbabilityTheory.cond]
· exact (measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ s)⁻¹).indicator hms
theorem pdf_toReal_ae_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hX : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x => (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] fun x =>
(s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x).toReal :=
Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp (pdf_eq hms hX) ENNReal.toReal
variable {X : Ω → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem mul_pdf_integrable (hcs : IsCompact s) (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal := by
by_cases hnt : volume s = 0 ∨ volume s = ∞
· have I : Integrable (fun x ↦ x * ENNReal.toReal (0)) := by simp
apply I.congr
filter_upwards [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top huX hnt] with x hx
simp [hx]
simp only [not_or] at hnt
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hnt.1 hnt.2 huX
constructor
· exact aestronglyMeasurable_id.mul
(measurable_pdf X ℙ).aemeasurable.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable
refine hasFiniteIntegral_mul (pdf_eq hcs.measurableSet huX) ?_
set ind := (volume s)⁻¹ • (1 : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞)
have : ∀ x, ‖x‖ₑ * s.indicator ind x = s.indicator (fun x => ‖x‖ₑ * ind x) x := fun x =>
(s.indicator_mul_right (fun x => ↑‖x‖₊) ind).symm
simp only [ind, this, lintegral_indicator hcs.measurableSet, mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
Pi.one_apply, Pi.smul_apply]
rw [lintegral_mul_const _ measurable_enorm]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top (setLIntegral_lt_top_of_isCompact hnt.2 hcs continuous_nnnorm).ne
(ENNReal.inv_lt_top.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hnt.1)).ne
/-- A real uniform random variable `X` with support `s` has expectation
`(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x ∂λ` where `λ` is the Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem integral_eq (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
∫ x, X x ∂ℙ = (volume s)⁻¹.toReal * ∫ x in s, x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← integral_smul_measure]
dsimp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at huX
rw [← huX]
by_cases hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ
· exact (integral_map hX aestronglyMeasurable_id).symm
· rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable hX, integral_zero_measure, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable]
rwa [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable]
end IsUniform
variable {X : Ω → E}
lemma IsUniform.cond {s : Set E} :
IsUniform (id : E → E) s (ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s) μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [Measure.map_id]
/-- The density of the uniform measure on a set with respect to itself. This allows us to abstract
away the choice of random variable and probability space. -/
def uniformPDF (s : Set E) (x : E) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x
/-- Check that indeed any uniform random variable has the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_eq_pdf {s : Set E} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hu : pdf.IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x ↦ uniformPDF s x μ) =ᵐ[μ] pdf X ℙ μ := by
unfold uniformPDF
exact Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (pdf.IsUniform.pdf_eq hs hu).symm (ae_eq_refl _)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Alternative way of writing the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_ite {s : Set E} {x : E} :
uniformPDF s x μ = if x ∈ s then (μ s)⁻¹ else 0 := by
unfold uniformPDF
unfold Set.indicator
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
end pdf
end MeasureTheory
namespace PMF
variable {α : Type*}
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
section UniformOfFinset
/-- Uniform distribution taking the same non-zero probability on the nonempty finset `s` -/
def uniformOfFinset (s : Finset α) (hs : s.Nonempty) : PMF α := by
classical
refine ofFinset (fun a => if a ∈ s then s.card⁻¹ else 0) s ?_ ?_
· simp only [Finset.sum_ite_mem, Finset.inter_self, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
have : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, Finset.card_eq_zero] using
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.1 hs
exact ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel this <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top s.card
· exact fun x hx => by simp only [hx, if_false]
variable {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {a : α}
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply (a : α) :
uniformOfFinset s hs a = if a ∈ s then (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ else 0 :=
rfl
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : uniformOfFinset s hs a = (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
simp [ha]
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : uniformOfFinset s hs a = 0 := by simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem support_uniformOfFinset : (uniformOfFinset s hs).support = s :=
Set.ext
(by
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
simp [mem_support_iff, Finset.ne_empty_of_mem ha])
theorem mem_support_uniformOfFinset_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (uniformOfFinset s hs).support ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
section Measure
variable (t : Set α)
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_uniformOfFinset_apply :
(uniformOfFinset s hs).toOuterMeasure t = #{x ∈ s | x ∈ t} / #s :=
calc
(uniformOfFinset s hs).toOuterMeasure t = ∑' x, if x ∈ t then uniformOfFinset s hs x else 0 :=
toOuterMeasure_apply (uniformOfFinset s hs) t
_ = ∑' x, if x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t then (#s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ else 0 :=
tsum_congr fun x => by simp_rw [uniformOfFinset_apply, ← ite_and, and_comm]
_ = ∑ x ∈ s with x ∈ t, if x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t then (#s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ else 0 :=
tsum_eq_sum fun _ hx => if_neg fun h => hx (Finset.mem_filter.2 h)
_ = ∑ x ∈ s with x ∈ t, (#s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => by
have this : x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t := by simpa using hx
simp only [this, and_self_iff, if_true]
_ = #{x ∈ s | x ∈ t} / #s := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_uniformOfFinset_apply [MeasurableSpace α] (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(uniformOfFinset s hs).toMeasure t = #{x ∈ s | x ∈ t} / #s :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply _ t ht).trans (toOuterMeasure_uniformOfFinset_apply hs t)
end Measure
end UniformOfFinset
section UniformOfFintype
/-- The uniform pmf taking the same uniform value on all of the fintype `α` -/
def uniformOfFintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [Nonempty α] : PMF α :=
uniformOfFinset Finset.univ Finset.univ_nonempty
variable [Fintype α] [Nonempty α]
@[simp]
theorem uniformOfFintype_apply (a : α) : uniformOfFintype α a = (Fintype.card α : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
simp [uniformOfFintype, Finset.mem_univ, if_true, uniformOfFinset_apply]
@[simp]
theorem support_uniformOfFintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [Nonempty α] :
(uniformOfFintype α).support = ⊤ :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp [mem_support_iff]
theorem mem_support_uniformOfFintype (a : α) : a ∈ (uniformOfFintype α).support := by simp
section Measure
variable (s : Set α)
theorem toOuterMeasure_uniformOfFintype_apply [Fintype s] :
(uniformOfFintype α).toOuterMeasure s = Fintype.card s / Fintype.card α := by
classical
rw [uniformOfFintype, toOuterMeasure_uniformOfFinset_apply, Fintype.card_subtype,
Finset.card_univ]
theorem toMeasure_uniformOfFintype_apply [MeasurableSpace α] (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Fintype s] :
(uniformOfFintype α).toMeasure s = Fintype.card s / Fintype.card α := by
classical
simp [uniformOfFintype, Fintype.card_subtype, hs]
end Measure
end UniformOfFintype
section OfMultiset
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a non-empty multiset `s` we construct the `PMF` which sends `a` to the fraction of
elements in `s` that are `a`. -/
def ofMultiset (s : Multiset α) (hs : s ≠ 0) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a => s.count a / (Multiset.card s),
ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2
(calc
(∑' b : α, (s.count b : ℝ≥0∞) / (Multiset.card s))
= (Multiset.card s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ∑' b, (s.count b : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
_ = (Multiset.card s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ∑ b ∈ s.toFinset, (s.count b : ℝ≥0∞) :=
(congr_arg (fun x => (Multiset.card s : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * x)
(tsum_eq_sum fun a ha =>
Nat.cast_eq_zero.2 <| by rwa [Multiset.count_eq_zero, ← Multiset.mem_toFinset]))
_ = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_sum, Multiset.toFinset_sum_count_eq s,
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (hs ∘ Multiset.card_eq_zero.1))
(ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _)]
)⟩
variable {s : Multiset α} (hs : s ≠ 0)
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem ofMultiset_apply (a : α) : ofMultiset s hs a = s.count a / (Multiset.card s) :=
rfl
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem support_ofMultiset : (ofMultiset s hs).support = s.toFinset :=
Set.ext (by simp [mem_support_iff, hs])
open scoped Classical in
theorem mem_support_ofMultiset_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (ofMultiset s hs).support ↔ a ∈ s.toFinset := by
simp
theorem ofMultiset_apply_of_not_mem {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : ofMultiset s hs a = 0 := by
simpa only [ofMultiset_apply, ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff, Nat.cast_eq_zero, Multiset.count_eq_zero,
ENNReal.natCast_ne_top, or_false] using ha
section Measure
variable (t : Set α)
open scoped Classical in
| @[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_ofMultiset_apply :
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 367 | 368 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.CoreAttrs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
For the proof that the factorial of `n` counts the permutations of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_perm`.
## Main declarations
* `Nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `Nat.ascFactorial`: The ascending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from `n` to
`n + k - 1`.
* `Nat.descFactorial`: The descending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from
`n - k + 1` to `n`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
/-- factorial notation `(n)!` for `Nat.factorial n`.
In Lean, names can end with exclamation marks (e.g. `List.get!`), so you cannot write
`n!` in Lean, but must write `(n)!` or `n !` instead. The former is preferred, since
Lean can confuse the `!` in `n !` as the (prefix) boolean negation operation in some
cases.
For numerals the parentheses are not required, so e.g. `0!` or `1!` work fine.
Todo: replace occurrences of `n !` with `(n)!` in Mathlib. -/
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : n ≠ 0) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn) ▸ rfl
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by
induction h with
| refl => exact Nat.dvd_refl _
| step _ ih => exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n !
| succ _, _, _, h => Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ≤ n ! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
theorem factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ! * (m + 1) ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n + 1 => by
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1), Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial (succ_le_succ (le_add_right _ _))
theorem factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n ! < m ! ↔ n < m := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_le.mp fun hmn => Nat.not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), fun h => ?_⟩
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n ! < (n + 1)! := by
intro k hk
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos]
exact Nat.mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos
induction h generalizing hn with
| refl => exact this hn
| step hnk ih => exact lt_trans (ih hn) <| this <| lt_trans hn <| lt_of_succ_le hnk
@[gcongr]
lemma factorial_lt_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : n < m) : n ! < m ! := (factorial_lt hn).mpr h
@[simp] lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n ! ↔ 1 < n := factorial_lt Nat.one_pos
@[simp]
theorem factorial_eq_one : n ! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h]
apply lt_irrefl
· rintro (_|_|_) <;> rfl
theorem factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m
· rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
· rfl
rw [← one_lt_factorial, h, one_lt_factorial] at hn
rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
theorem factorial_inj' (h : 1 < n ∨ 1 < m) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
obtain hn|hm := h
· exact factorial_inj hn
· rw [eq_comm, factorial_inj hm, eq_comm]
theorem self_le_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, n ≤ n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| k + 1 => Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.one_le_of_lt k.factorial_pos)
theorem lt_factorial_self {n : ℕ} (hi : 3 ≤ n) : n < n ! := by
have : 0 < n := by omega
have hn : 1 < pred n := le_pred_of_lt (succ_le_iff.mp hi)
rw [← succ_pred_eq_of_pos ‹0 < n›, factorial_succ]
exact (Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right (pred n).succ_pos).2
((Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn (self_le_factorial _)))
theorem add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ {i : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) :
i + (n + 1)! < (i + n + 1)! := by
rw [factorial_succ (i + _), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
have := (i + n).self_le_factorial
refine Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((Nat.lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right ?_).2 ?_))
(factorial_le ?_) <;> omega
theorem add_factorial_lt_factorial_add {i n : ℕ} (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
i + n ! < (i + n)! := by
cases hn
· rw [factorial_one]
exact lt_factorial_self (succ_le_succ hi)
exact add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ _ hi
theorem add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ (i : ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
i + (n + 1)! ≤ (i + (n + 1))! := by
cases (le_or_lt (2 : ℕ) i)
· rw [← Nat.add_assoc]
apply Nat.le_of_lt
apply add_factorial_succ_lt_factorial_add_succ
assumption
· match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 =>
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ (1 + n), Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_comm 1 n,
Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
exact Nat.mul_pos n.succ_pos n.succ.factorial_pos
| succ (succ n) => contradiction
theorem add_factorial_le_factorial_add (i : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : i + n ! ≤ (i + n)! := by
rcases n1 with - | @h
· exact self_le_factorial _
exact add_factorial_succ_le_factorial_add_succ i h
theorem factorial_mul_pow_sub_le_factorial {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : n ! * n ^ (m - n) ≤ m ! := by
calc
_ ≤ n ! * (n + 1) ^ (m - n) := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ ≤ _ := by simpa [hnm] using @Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial n (m - n)
lemma factorial_le_pow : ∀ n, n ! ≤ n ^ n
| 0 => le_refl _
| n + 1 =>
calc
_ ≤ (n + 1) * n ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ n.factorial_le_pow
_ ≤ (n + 1) * (n + 1) ^ n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.pow_le_pow_left n.le_succ _)
_ = _ := by rw [pow_succ']
end Factorial
/-! ### Ascending and descending factorials -/
section AscFactorial
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = n (n + 1) ⋯ (n + k - 1)`. This is closely related to `ascPochhammer`, but
much less general. -/
def ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| k + 1 => (n + k) * ascFactorial n k
@[simp]
theorem ascFactorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.ascFactorial 0 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem ascFactorial_succ {n k : ℕ} : n.ascFactorial k.succ = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k :=
rfl
theorem zero_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (0 : ℕ).ascFactorial k.succ = 0
| 0 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ascFactorial_zero, Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_mul]
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, zero_ascFactorial k, Nat.mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem one_ascFactorial : ∀ (k : ℕ), (1 : ℕ).ascFactorial k = k.factorial
| 0 => ascFactorial_zero 1
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, one_ascFactorial k, Nat.add_comm, factorial_succ]
theorem succ_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, n * n.succ.ascFactorial k = (n + k) * n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [Nat.add_zero, ascFactorial_zero, ascFactorial_zero]
| k + 1 => by rw [ascFactorial, Nat.mul_left_comm, succ_ascFactorial n k, ascFactorial, succ_add,
← Nat.add_assoc]
/-- `(n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k) ! / n !` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. -/
theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n ! * (n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k)!
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.mul_one]
| k + 1 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, ← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (n + 1 + k),
← Nat.mul_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial n k, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_right_comm]
/-- `n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! / (n - 1)!` for `n > 0` but without ℕ-division. See
`Nat.ascFactorial_eq_div` for the version with ℕ-division. Consider using
`factorial_mul_ascFactorial` to avoid complications of ℕ-subtraction. -/
theorem factorial_mul_ascFactorial' (n k : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) :
(n - 1) ! * n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_comm h, Nat.sub_one]
nth_rw 2 [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq h rfl]
rw [Nat.sub_one, factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
theorem ascFactorial_mul_ascFactorial (n l k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial l * (n + l).ascFactorial k = n.ascFactorial (l + k) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
cases l
· simp only [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.one_mul, Nat.zero_add]
· simp only [Nat.add_right_comm, zero_ascFactorial, Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_mul]
| succ n' =>
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel (factorial_pos n')
simp only [Nat.add_assoc, ← Nat.mul_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
rw [Nat.add_comm 1 l, ← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.add_assoc]
/-- Avoid in favor of `Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
theorem ascFactorial_eq_div (n k : ℕ) : (n + 1).ascFactorial k = (n + k)! / n ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right n.factorial_ne_zero (factorial_mul_ascFactorial _ _)
/-- Avoid in favor of `Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial'` if you can. ℕ-division isn't worth it. -/
theorem ascFactorial_eq_div' (n k : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) :
n.ascFactorial k = (n + k - 1)! / (n - 1) ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right (n - 1).factorial_ne_zero (factorial_mul_ascFactorial' _ _ h)
theorem ascFactorial_of_sub {n k : ℕ} :
(n - k) * (n - k + 1).ascFactorial k = (n - k).ascFactorial (k + 1) := by
rw [succ_ascFactorial, ascFactorial_succ]
theorem pow_succ_le_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k : ℕ, n ^ k ≤ n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.pow_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ascFactorial_succ, ← succ_ascFactorial]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul (Nat.le_refl n)
(Nat.le_trans (Nat.pow_le_pow_left (le_succ n) k) (pow_succ_le_ascFactorial n.succ k))
theorem pow_lt_ascFactorial' (n k : ℕ) : (n + 1) ^ (k + 2) < (n + 1).ascFactorial (k + 2) := by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right k.succ_pos)
(pow_succ_le_ascFactorial n.succ _) (Nat.pow_pos n.succ_pos)
theorem pow_lt_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → (n + 1) ^ k < (n + 1).ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 => by intro; contradiction
| k + 2 => fun _ => pow_lt_ascFactorial' n k
theorem ascFactorial_le_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ k : ℕ, (n+1).ascFactorial k ≤ (n + k) ^ k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, Nat.pow_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [ascFactorial_succ, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n 1 k]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right _
(Nat.le_trans (ascFactorial_le_pow_add _ k) (Nat.pow_le_pow_left (le_succ _) _))
theorem ascFactorial_lt_pow_add (n : ℕ) : ∀ {k : ℕ}, 2 ≤ k → (n + 1).ascFactorial k < (n + k) ^ k
| 0 => by rintro ⟨⟩
| 1 => by intro; contradiction
| k + 2 => fun _ => by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm, ascFactorial_succ, succ_add_eq_add_succ n (k + 1)]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (le_refl _) (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (ascFactorial_le_pow_add n _)
(Nat.pow_lt_pow_left (Nat.lt_succ_self _) k.succ_ne_zero)) (succ_pos _)
theorem ascFactorial_pos (n k : ℕ) : 0 < (n + 1).ascFactorial k :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pow_pos n.succ_pos) (pow_succ_le_ascFactorial (n + 1) k)
end AscFactorial
section DescFactorial
/-- `n.descFactorial k = n! / (n - k)!` (as seen in `Nat.descFactorial_eq_div`), but
implemented recursively to allow for "quick" computation when using `norm_num`. This is closely
related to `descPochhammer`, but much less general. -/
def descFactorial (n : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| k + 1 => (n - k) * descFactorial n k
@[simp]
theorem descFactorial_zero (n : ℕ) : n.descFactorial 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem descFactorial_succ (n k : ℕ) : n.descFactorial (k + 1) = (n - k) * n.descFactorial k :=
rfl
theorem zero_descFactorial_succ (k : ℕ) : (0 : ℕ).descFactorial (k + 1) = 0 := by
rw [descFactorial_succ, Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_mul]
theorem descFactorial_one (n : ℕ) : n.descFactorial 1 = n := by simp
theorem succ_descFactorial_succ (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, (n + 1).descFactorial (k + 1) = (n + 1) * n.descFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [descFactorial_zero, descFactorial_one, Nat.mul_one]
| succ k => by
rw [descFactorial_succ, succ_descFactorial_succ _ k, descFactorial_succ, succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_left_comm]
theorem succ_descFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (n + 1 - k) * (n + 1).descFactorial k = (n + 1) * n.descFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [Nat.sub_zero, descFactorial_zero, descFactorial_zero]
| k + 1 => by
rw [descFactorial, succ_descFactorial _ k, descFactorial_succ, succ_sub_succ, Nat.mul_left_comm]
theorem descFactorial_self : ∀ n : ℕ, n.descFactorial n = n !
| 0 => by rw [descFactorial_zero, factorial_zero]
| succ n => by rw [succ_descFactorial_succ, descFactorial_self n, factorial_succ]
@[simp]
theorem descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt {n : ℕ} : ∀ {k : ℕ}, n.descFactorial k = 0 ↔ n < k
| 0 => by simp only [descFactorial_zero, Nat.one_ne_zero, Nat.not_lt_zero]
| succ k => by
rw [descFactorial_succ, mul_eq_zero, descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt, Nat.lt_succ_iff,
Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne, or_iff_left_iff_imp, and_imp]
exact fun h _ => h
alias ⟨_, descFactorial_of_lt⟩ := descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt
theorem add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) : ∀ k : ℕ,
(n + k).descFactorial k = (n + 1).ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, descFactorial_zero]
| succ k => by
rw [Nat.add_succ, succ_descFactorial_succ, ascFactorial_succ,
add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial _ k, Nat.add_right_comm]
theorem add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial' (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, (n + k - 1).descFactorial k = n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascFactorial_zero, descFactorial_zero]
| succ k => by
| rw [descFactorial_succ, ascFactorial_succ, ← succ_add_eq_add_succ,
add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial' _ k, ← succ_ascFactorial, succ_add_sub_one,
Nat.add_sub_cancel]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 362 | 364 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
instance (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel (SameCycle f)] :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f⁻¹) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (f.SameCycle x y) (sameCycle_inv).symm
instance (priority := 100) [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (SameCycle (1 : Perm α)) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (x = y) sameCycle_one.symm
end SameCycle
/-!
### `IsCycle`
-/
section IsCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- A cycle is a non identity permutation where any two nonfixed points of the permutation are
related by repeated application of the permutation. -/
def IsCycle (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, f y ≠ y → SameCycle f x y
theorem IsCycle.ne_one (h : IsCycle f) : f ≠ 1 := fun hf => by simp [hf, IsCycle] at h
@[simp]
theorem not_isCycle_one : ¬(1 : Perm α).IsCycle := fun H => H.ne_one rfl
protected theorem IsCycle.sameCycle (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
SameCycle f x y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 hx
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 hy
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
theorem IsCycle.exists_zpow_eq : IsCycle f → f x ≠ x → f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
IsCycle.sameCycle
theorem IsCycle.inv (hf : IsCycle f) : IsCycle f⁻¹ :=
hf.imp fun _ ⟨hx, h⟩ =>
⟨inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hx.symm, fun _ hy => (h <| inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hy.symm).inv⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_inv : IsCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsCycle f :=
⟨fun h => h.inv, IsCycle.inv⟩
theorem IsCycle.conj : IsCycle f → IsCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx, h⟩
refine ⟨g x, by simp [coe_mul, inv_apply_self, hx], fun y hy => ?_⟩
rw [← apply_inv_self g y]
exact (h <| eq_inv_iff_eq.not.2 hy).conj
protected theorem IsCycle.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
IsCycle g → IsCycle (g.extendDomain f) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩
refine ⟨f a, ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· rw [extendDomain_apply_image]
exact Subtype.coe_injective.ne (f.injective.ne ha)
have h : b = f (f.symm ⟨b, of_not_not <| hb ∘ extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _⟩) := by
rw [apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [h] at hb ⊢
simp only [extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_injective.ne_iff, f.injective.ne_iff] at hb
exact (ha' hb).extendDomain
theorem isCycle_iff_sameCycle (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle f ↔ ∀ {y}, SameCycle f x y ↔ f y ≠ y :=
⟨fun hf y =>
⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ hy =>
hx <| by
rw [← zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy i, (f ^ i).injective.eq_iff] at hi
rw [hi, hy],
hf.exists_zpow_eq hx⟩,
fun h => ⟨x, hx, fun _ hy => h.2 hy⟩⟩
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem IsCycle.exists_pow_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx hy
classical exact
⟨(n % orderOf f).toNat, by
{have := n.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt (orderOf_pos f)))
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this, zpow_mod_orderOf]}⟩
end Finite
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem isCycle_swap (hxy : x ≠ y) : IsCycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa [swap_apply_right], fun a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a) =>
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else
⟨1, by
rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs at * <;> tauto⟩⟩
protected theorem IsSwap.isCycle : IsSwap f → IsCycle f := by
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩
exact isCycle_swap hxy
variable [Fintype α]
theorem IsCycle.two_le_card_support (h : IsCycle f) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
two_le_card_support_of_ne_one h.ne_one
/-- The subgroup generated by a cycle is in bijection with its support -/
noncomputable def IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) :
(Subgroup.zpowers σ) ≃ σ.support :=
Equiv.ofBijective
(fun (τ : ↥ ((Subgroup.zpowers σ) : Set (Perm α))) =>
⟨(τ : Perm α) (Classical.choose hσ), by
obtain ⟨τ, n, rfl⟩ := τ
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
exact (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1⟩)
(by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, m, rfl⟩ ⟨b, n, rfl⟩ h
ext y
by_cases hy : σ y = y
· simp_rw [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy]
· obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_comm σ m i, zpow_apply_comm σ n i]
exact congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_support] at hy
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
exact ⟨⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) {n : ℕ} :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport ⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ =
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_symm_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) (n : ℕ) :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ =
⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ :=
(Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 hσ.zpowersEquivSupport_apply
protected theorem IsCycle.orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) : orderOf f = #f.support := by
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers, ← Fintype.card_coe]
convert Fintype.card_congr (IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport hf)
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℕ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => exact fun _ h => ⟨0, h⟩
| succ n hn =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb' : (swap x (f x) * f) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx), Ne, ←
f.injective.eq_iff, apply_inv_self]
exact this.1
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn hb' (f.injective <| by
rw [apply_inv_self]; rwa [pow_succ', mul_apply] at h)
⟨i + 1, by
rw [add_comm, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, zpow_one, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb).2 (Ne.symm hfbx)]⟩
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℤ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n
| negSucc n =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx' : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx'⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [inv_eq_iff_eq, Perm.mul_apply, zpow_negSucc, Ne, Perm.apply_inv_self] at *
<;> tauto
let ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb
(show (f⁻¹ ^ n) (f⁻¹ x) = f⁻¹ b by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, zpow_negSucc,
← inv_pow, pow_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, mul_one, zpow_natCast,
← pow_succ', ← pow_succ])
have h : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f x) = f⁻¹ x := by
rw [mul_apply, inv_apply_self, swap_apply_left]
⟨-i, by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right i 1, neg_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_one, zpow_neg,
← inv_zpow, mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, inv_apply_self, swap_comm _ x,
zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply, mul_apply (_ ^ i), h, hi, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx')]⟩
theorem IsCycle.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α}
(hf : IsCycle f) {x : α} (hfx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) = x) : f = swap x (f x) :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hz.2 hfx
if hyx : y = x then by simp [hyx]
else
if hfyx : y = f x then by simp [hfyx, hffx]
else by
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hyx hfyx]
refine by_contradiction fun hy => ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hz.2 hy
rw [← sub_add_cancel j i, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi] at hj
rcases zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx (j - i) with hji | hji
· rw [← hj, hji] at hyx
tauto
· rw [← hj, hji] at hfyx
tauto
| theorem IsCycle.swap_mul {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : IsCycle (swap x (f x) * f) :=
⟨f x, by simp [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, if_neg hffx, f.injective.eq_iff, if_neg hx, hx],
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 423 | 425 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Winston Yin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Diam
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we provide various ways to prove that various combinations of Lipschitz continuous
functions are Lipschitz continuous. We also prove that Lipschitz continuous functions are
uniformly continuous, and that locally Lipschitz functions are continuous.
## Main definitions and lemmas
* `LipschitzWith K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0`
* `LipschitzOnWith K f s`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0` on a set `s`
* `LipschitzWith.uniformContinuous`: a Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous
* `LipschitzOnWith.uniformContinuousOn`: a function which is Lipschitz on a set `s` is uniformly
continuous on `s`.
* `LocallyLipschitz f`: states that `f` is locally Lipschitz
* `LocallyLipschitzOn f s`: states that `f` is locally Lipschitz on `s`.
* `LocallyLipschitz.continuous`: a locally Lipschitz function is continuous.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzWith (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) := ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` **on `s`** if
for all `x, y` in `s` we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzOnWith (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
/-- `f : α → β` is called **locally Lipschitz continuous** iff every point `x`
has a neighbourhood on which `f` is Lipschitz. -/
def LocallyLipschitz (f : α → β) : Prop := ∀ x, ∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f t
/-- `f : α → β` is called **locally Lipschitz continuous** on `s` iff every point `x` of `s`
has a neighbourhood within `s` on which `f` is Lipschitz. -/
def LocallyLipschitzOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t
/-- Every function is Lipschitz on the empty set (with any Lipschitz constant). -/
@[simp]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_empty (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) : LipschitzOnWith K f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp] lemma locallyLipschitzOn_empty (f : α → β) : LocallyLipschitzOn ∅ f := fun _ ↦ False.elim
/-- Being Lipschitz on a set is monotone w.r.t. that set. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.mono (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f t) (h : s ⊆ t) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun _x x_in _y y_in => hf (h x_in) (h y_in)
lemma LocallyLipschitzOn.mono (hf : LocallyLipschitzOn t f) (h : s ⊆ t) : LocallyLipschitzOn s f :=
fun x hx ↦ by obtain ⟨K, u, hu, hfu⟩ := hf (h hx); exact ⟨K, u, nhdsWithin_mono _ h hu, hfu⟩
/-- `f` is Lipschitz iff it is Lipschitz on the entire space. -/
@[simp] lemma lipschitzOnWith_univ : LipschitzOnWith K f univ ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
@[simp] lemma locallyLipschitzOn_univ : LocallyLipschitzOn univ f ↔ LocallyLipschitz f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitzOn, LocallyLipschitz]
protected lemma LocallyLipschitz.locallyLipschitzOn (h : LocallyLipschitz f) :
LocallyLipschitzOn s f := (locallyLipschitzOn_univ.2 h).mono s.subset_univ
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict : LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
lemma lipschitzOnWith_restrict {t : Set s} :
LipschitzOnWith K (s.restrict f) t ↔ LipschitzOnWith K f (s ∩ Subtype.val '' t) := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
lemma locallyLipschitzOn_iff_restrict :
LocallyLipschitzOn s f ↔ LocallyLipschitz (s.restrict f) := by
simp only [LocallyLipschitzOn, LocallyLipschitz, SetCoe.forall', restrict_apply,
Subtype.edist_mk_mk, ← lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict, lipschitzOnWith_restrict,
nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin, mem_comap]
congr! with x K
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hft⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩, hft.mono <| inter_subset_right.trans <| image_preimage_subset ..⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ⟨u, hu, hut⟩, hft⟩
exact ⟨s ∩ u, Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin hu,
hft.mono fun x hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, ⟨x, hx.1⟩, hut hx.2, rfl⟩⟩
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LocallyLipschitzOn.restrict, _⟩ := locallyLipschitzOn_iff_restrict
lemma Set.MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t) :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (h.restrict f s t) :=
_root_.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict_mapsTo, _⟩ := Set.MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
end PseudoEMetricSpace
namespace LipschitzWith
open EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
protected theorem lipschitzOnWith (h : LipschitzWith K f) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun x _ y _ => h x y
theorem edist_le_mul (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y :=
h x y
theorem edist_le_mul_of_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h x y).trans <| mul_left_mono hr
theorem edist_lt_mul_of_lt (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : edist x y < r) :
edist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(h x y).trans_lt <| (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hK) ENNReal.coe_ne_top).2 hr
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (closedBall x r) (closedBall (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_le_mul_of_le hy
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (ball x r) (ball (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
theorem edist_lt_top (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} (h : edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
edist (f x) (f y) < ⊤ :=
(hf x y).trans_lt <| ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_lt_top h.lt_top
theorem mul_edist_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y := by
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' (h x y)
protected theorem of_edist_le (h : ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
fun x y => by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, h]
protected theorem weaken (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {K' : ℝ≥0} (h : K ≤ K') : LipschitzWith K' f :=
fun x y => le_trans (hf x y) <| mul_right_mono (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 h)
theorem ediam_image_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) :
EMetric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * EMetric.diam s := by
apply EMetric.diam_le
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact hf.edist_le_mul_of_le (EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy)
theorem edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} {d : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
calc
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y := hf x y
_ < d := ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' h
/-- A Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : UniformContinuous f :=
EMetric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε εpos =>
⟨ε / K, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ne_of_gt εpos, ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩, hf.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div⟩
/-- A Lipschitz function is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : Continuous f :=
hf.uniformContinuous.continuous
/-- Constant functions are Lipschitz (with any constant). -/
protected theorem const (b : β) : LipschitzWith 0 fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
protected theorem const' (b : β) {K : ℝ≥0} : LipschitzWith K fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
/-- The identity is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem id : LipschitzWith 1 (@id α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
/-- The inclusion of a subset is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem subtype_val (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Subtype.val : s → α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
theorem subtype_mk (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {p : β → Prop} (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
LipschitzWith K (fun x => ⟨f x, hp x⟩ : α → { y // p y }) :=
hf
protected theorem eval {α : ι → Type u} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] [Fintype ι] (i : ι) :
LipschitzWith 1 (Function.eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun f g => by convert edist_le_pi_edist f g i
/-- The restriction of a `K`-Lipschitz function is `K`-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) :=
fun x y => hf x y
/-- The composition of Lipschitz functions is Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem comp {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f)
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) := fun x y =>
calc
edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) := hf _ _
_ ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) := mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
_ = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y := by rw [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.coe_mul]
theorem comp_lipschitzOnWith {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) : LipschitzOnWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) s :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mpr <| hf.comp hg.to_restrict
protected theorem prod_fst : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.fst α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_left _ _
protected theorem prod_snd : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.snd α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_right _ _
/-- If `f` and `g` are Lipschitz functions, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected theorem prodMk {f : α → β} {Kf : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) {g : α → γ} {Kg : ℝ≥0}
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => (f x, g x) := by
intro x y
rw [ENNReal.coe_mono.map_max, Prod.edist_eq, max_mul]
exact max_le_max (hf x y) (hg x y)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod := LipschitzWith.prodMk
protected theorem prodMk_left (a : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) := by
simpa only [max_eq_right zero_le_one] using (LipschitzWith.const a).prodMk LipschitzWith.id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod_mk_left := LipschitzWith.prodMk_left
protected theorem prodMk_right (b : β) : LipschitzWith 1 fun a : α => (a, b) := by
simpa only [max_eq_left zero_le_one] using LipschitzWith.id.prodMk (LipschitzWith.const b)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod_mk_right := LipschitzWith.prodMk_right
protected theorem uncurry {f : α → β → γ} {Kα Kβ : ℝ≥0} (hα : ∀ b, LipschitzWith Kα fun a => f a b)
(hβ : ∀ a, LipschitzWith Kβ (f a)) : LipschitzWith (Kα + Kβ) (Function.uncurry f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
simp only [Function.uncurry, ENNReal.coe_add, add_mul]
apply le_trans (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _)
exact
add_le_add (le_trans (hα _ _ _) <| mul_left_mono <| le_max_left _ _)
(le_trans (hβ _ _ _) <| mul_left_mono <| le_max_right _ _)
/-- Iterates of a Lipschitz function are Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : ∀ n, LipschitzWith (K ^ n) f^[n]
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LipschitzWith.id
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact (LipschitzWith.iterate hf n).comp hf
theorem edist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x n) :
edist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ edist x (f x) * (K : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n := by
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm]
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n) x (f x)
protected theorem mul_end {f g : Function.End α} {Kf Kg} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f)
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (f * g : Function.End α) :=
hf.comp hg
/-- The product of a list of Lipschitz continuous endomorphisms is a Lipschitz continuous
endomorphism. -/
protected theorem list_prod (f : ι → Function.End α) (K : ι → ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ i, LipschitzWith (K i) (f i)) : ∀ l : List ι, LipschitzWith (l.map K).prod (l.map f).prod
| [] => by simpa using LipschitzWith.id
| i::l => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
exact (h i).mul_end (LipschitzWith.list_prod f K h l)
protected theorem pow_end {f : Function.End α} {K} (h : LipschitzWith K f) :
∀ n : ℕ, LipschitzWith (K ^ n) (f ^ n : Function.End α)
| 0 => by simpa only [pow_zero] using LipschitzWith.id
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (LipschitzWith.pow_end h n).mul_end h
end LipschitzWith
namespace LipschitzOnWith
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
protected theorem uniformContinuousOn (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) : UniformContinuousOn f s :=
uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict.mpr hf.to_restrict.uniformContinuous
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
hf.uniformContinuousOn.continuousOn
theorem edist_le_mul_of_le (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h hx hy).trans <| mul_left_mono hr
theorem edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{d : ℝ≥0∞} (hd : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
hf.to_restrict.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div <|
show edist (⟨x, hx⟩ : s) ⟨y, hy⟩ < d / K from hd
protected theorem comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {Kg : ℝ≥0} (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g t)
(hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) : LipschitzOnWith (Kg * K) (g ∘ f) s :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mpr <| hg.to_restrict.comp (hf.to_restrict_mapsTo hmaps)
/-- If `f` and `g` are Lipschitz on `s`, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected theorem prodMk {g : α → γ} {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith Kf f s)
(hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) : LipschitzOnWith (max Kf Kg) (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := by
intro _ hx _ hy
rw [ENNReal.coe_mono.map_max, Prod.edist_eq, max_mul]
exact max_le_max (hf hx hy) (hg hx hy)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod := LipschitzOnWith.prodMk
theorem ediam_image2_le (f : α → β → γ) {K₁ K₂ : ℝ≥0} (s : Set α) (t : Set β)
(hf₁ : ∀ b ∈ t, LipschitzOnWith K₁ (f · b) s) (hf₂ : ∀ a ∈ s, LipschitzOnWith K₂ (f a) t) :
EMetric.diam (Set.image2 f s t) ≤ ↑K₁ * EMetric.diam s + ↑K₂ * EMetric.diam t := by
simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image2]
intro a₁ ha₁ b₁ hb₁ a₂ ha₂ b₂ hb₂
refine (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _).trans ?_
exact
add_le_add
((hf₁ b₁ hb₁ ha₁ ha₂).trans <| mul_left_mono <| EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem ha₁ ha₂)
((hf₂ a₂ ha₂ hb₁ hb₂).trans <| mul_left_mono <| EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hb₁ hb₂)
end LipschitzOnWith
namespace LocallyLipschitz
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ] {f : α → β}
/-- A Lipschitz function is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma _root_.LipschitzWith.locallyLipschitz {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
LocallyLipschitz f :=
fun _ ↦ ⟨K, univ, Filter.univ_mem, lipschitzOnWith_univ.mpr hf⟩
/-- The identity function is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma id : LocallyLipschitz (@id α) := LipschitzWith.id.locallyLipschitz
/-- Constant functions are locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma const (b : β) : LocallyLipschitz (fun _ : α ↦ b) :=
(LipschitzWith.const b).locallyLipschitz
/-- A locally Lipschitz function is continuous. (The converse is false: for example,
$x ↦ \sqrt{x}$ is continuous, but not locally Lipschitz at 0.) -/
protected theorem continuous {f : α → β} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) : Continuous f := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
rcases (hf x) with ⟨K, t, ht, hK⟩
exact (hK.continuousOn).continuousAt ht
/-- The composition of locally Lipschitz functions is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma comp {f : β → γ} {g : α → β}
(hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) : LocallyLipschitz (f ∘ g) := by
intro x
-- g is Lipschitz on t ∋ x, f is Lipschitz on u ∋ g(x)
rcases hg x with ⟨Kg, t, ht, hgL⟩
rcases hf (g x) with ⟨Kf, u, hu, hfL⟩
refine ⟨Kf * Kg, t ∩ g⁻¹' u, inter_mem ht (hg.continuous.continuousAt hu), ?_⟩
exact hfL.comp (hgL.mono inter_subset_left)
((mapsTo_preimage g u).mono_left inter_subset_right)
/-- If `f` and `g` are locally Lipschitz, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected lemma prodMk {f : α → β} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) {g : α → γ} (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz fun x => (f x, g x) := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨Kf, t₁, h₁t, hfL⟩
rcases hg x with ⟨Kg, t₂, h₂t, hgL⟩
refine ⟨max Kf Kg, t₁ ∩ t₂, Filter.inter_mem h₁t h₂t, ?_⟩
exact (hfL.mono inter_subset_left).prodMk (hgL.mono inter_subset_right)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod := LocallyLipschitz.prodMk
protected theorem prodMk_left (a : α) : LocallyLipschitz (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) :=
(LipschitzWith.prodMk_left a).locallyLipschitz
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod_mk_left := LocallyLipschitz.prodMk_left
protected theorem prodMk_right (b : β) : LocallyLipschitz (fun a : α => (a, b)) :=
(LipschitzWith.prodMk_right b).locallyLipschitz
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
| protected alias prod_mk_right := LocallyLipschitz.prodMk_right
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) : ∀ n, LocallyLipschitz f^[n]
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 398 | 400 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Kim Morrison, Apurva Nakade, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.PGame.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Combinatorial games.
In this file we construct an instance `OrderedAddCommGroup SetTheory.Game`.
## Multiplication on pre-games
We define the operations of multiplication and inverse on pre-games, and prove a few basic theorems
about them. Multiplication is not well-behaved under equivalence of pre-games i.e. `x ≈ y` does not
imply `x * z ≈ y * z`. Hence, multiplication is not a well-defined operation on games. Nevertheless,
the abelian group structure on games allows us to simplify many proofs for pre-games.
-/
-- Porting note: many definitions here are noncomputable as the compiler does not support PGame.rec
noncomputable section
namespace SetTheory
open Function PGame
universe u
-- Porting note: moved the setoid instance to PGame.lean
/-- The type of combinatorial games. In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a combinatorial pre-game is built
inductively from two families of combinatorial games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC.
A combinatorial game is then constructed by quotienting by the equivalence
`x ≈ y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`. -/
abbrev Game :=
Quotient PGame.setoid
namespace Game
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11445): added this definition
/-- Negation of games. -/
instance : Neg Game where
neg := Quot.map Neg.neg <| fun _ _ => (neg_equiv_neg_iff).2
instance : Zero Game where zero := ⟦0⟧
instance : Add Game where
add := Quotient.map₂ HAdd.hAdd <| fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => PGame.add_congr hx hy
instance instAddCommGroupWithOneGame : AddCommGroupWithOne Game where
zero := ⟦0⟧
one := ⟦1⟧
add_zero := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (add_zero_equiv x)
zero_add := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (zero_add_equiv x)
add_assoc := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact Quot.sound add_assoc_equiv
neg_add_cancel := Quotient.ind <| fun x => Quot.sound (neg_add_cancel_equiv x)
add_comm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quot.sound add_comm_equiv
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
instance : Inhabited Game :=
⟨0⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Game) = ⟦0⟧ :=
rfl
instance instPartialOrderGame : PartialOrder Game where
le := Quotient.lift₂ (· ≤ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (le_congr hx hy)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact le_refl x
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact @le_trans _ _ x y z
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h₁ h₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lt := Quotient.lift₂ (· < ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lt_congr hx hy)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact @lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ x y
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on games.
If `0 ⧏ x` (less or fuzzy with), then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.LF fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lf_congr hx hy)
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_le : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬x ≤ y ↔ Game.LF y x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_le
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_lf : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬Game.LF x y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_lf
/-- The fuzzy, confused, or incomparable relation on games.
If `x ‖ 0`, then the first player can always win `x`. -/
def Fuzzy : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.Fuzzy fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (fuzzy_congr hx hy)
-- Porting note: had to replace ⧏ with LF, otherwise cannot differentiate with the operator on PGame
instance : IsTrichotomous Game LF :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
change _ ∨ ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ ∨ _
rw [Quotient.eq]
apply lf_or_equiv_or_gf⟩
/-! It can be useful to use these lemmas to turn `PGame` inequalities into `Game` inequalities, as
the `AddCommGroup` structure on `Game` often simplifies many proofs. -/
end Game
namespace PGame
-- Porting note: In a lot of places, I had to add explicitly that the quotient element was a Game.
-- In Lean4, quotients don't have the setoid as an instance argument,
-- but as an explicit argument, see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/confusion.20between.20equivalence.20and.20instance.20setoid/near/360822354
theorem le_iff_game_le {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) ≤ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lf_iff_game_lf {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y ↔ Game.LF ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_game_lt {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) < ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem equiv_iff_game_eq {x y : PGame} : x ≈ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
(@Quotient.eq' _ _ x y).symm
alias ⟨game_eq, _⟩ := equiv_iff_game_eq
theorem fuzzy_iff_game_fuzzy {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y ↔ Game.Fuzzy ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
end PGame
namespace Game
local infixl:50 " ⧏ " => LF
local infixl:50 " ‖ " => Fuzzy
instance addLeftMono : AddLeftMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightMono : AddRightMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightStrictMono : AddRightStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
theorem add_lf_add_right : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (b + a : Game) ⧏ c + a := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_right h
theorem add_lf_add_left : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (a + b : Game) ⧏ a + c := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_left h
instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid Game :=
{ add_le_add_left := @add_le_add_left _ _ _ Game.addLeftMono }
/-- A small family of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddAbove_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
simpa using bddAbove_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
/-- A small family of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddBelow (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddBelow_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddBelow s := by
simpa using bddBelow_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
end Game
namespace PGame
@[simp] theorem quot_zero : (⟦0⟧ : Game) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_one : (⟦1⟧ : Game) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_neg (a : PGame) : (⟦-a⟧ : Game) = -⟦a⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_add (a b : PGame) : ⟦a + b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) + ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_sub (a b : PGame) : ⟦a - b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) - ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quot_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, ⟦(n : PGame)⟧ = (n : Game)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [PGame.nat_succ, quot_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, quot_natCast]
rfl
theorem quot_eq_of_mk'_quot_eq {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves)
(R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves) (hl : ∀ i, (⟦x.moveLeft i⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveLeft (L i)⟧)
(hr : ∀ j, (⟦x.moveRight j⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveRight (R j)⟧) : (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
game_eq (.of_equiv L R (fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hl _))
(fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hr _)))
/-! Multiplicative operations can be defined at the level of pre-games,
but to prove their properties we need to use the abelian group structure of games.
Hence we define them here. -/
/-- The product of `x = {xL | xR}` and `y = {yL | yR}` is
`{xL*y + x*yL - xL*yL, xR*y + x*yR - xR*yR | xL*y + x*yR - xL*yR, xR*y + x*yL - xR*yL}`. -/
instance : Mul PGame.{u} :=
⟨fun x y => by
induction x generalizing y with | mk xl xr _ _ IHxl IHxr => _
induction y with | mk yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr => _
have y := mk yl yr yL yR
refine ⟨(xl × yl) ⊕ (xr × yr), (xl × yr) ⊕ (xr × yl), ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩)
· exact IHxl i y + IHyl j - IHxl i (yL j)
· exact IHxr i y + IHyr j - IHxr i (yR j)
· exact IHxl i y + IHyr j - IHxl i (yR j)
· exact IHxr i y + IHyl j - IHxr i (yL j)⟩
theorem leftMoves_mul :
∀ x y : PGame.{u},
(x * y).LeftMoves = (x.LeftMoves × y.LeftMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.RightMoves)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem rightMoves_mul :
∀ x y : PGame.{u},
(x * y).RightMoves = (x.LeftMoves × y.RightMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.LeftMoves)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- Turns two left or right moves for `x` and `y` into a left move for `x * y` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toLeftMovesMul {x y : PGame} :
(x.LeftMoves × y.LeftMoves) ⊕ (x.RightMoves × y.RightMoves) ≃ (x * y).LeftMoves :=
Equiv.cast (leftMoves_mul x y).symm
/-- Turns a left and a right move for `x` and `y` into a right move for `x * y` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toRightMovesMul {x y : PGame} :
(x.LeftMoves × y.RightMoves) ⊕ (x.RightMoves × y.LeftMoves) ≃ (x * y).RightMoves :=
Equiv.cast (rightMoves_mul x y).symm
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveLeft_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveLeft (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xL i * yL j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveLeft_inl {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveLeft (toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inl (i, j))) =
x.moveLeft i * y + x * y.moveLeft j - x.moveLeft i * y.moveLeft j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveLeft_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveLeft (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xR i * yR j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveLeft_inr {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveLeft (toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inr (i, j))) =
x.moveRight i * y + x * y.moveRight j - x.moveRight i * y.moveRight j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveRight_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveRight (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xL i * yR j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveRight_inl {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveRight (toRightMovesMul (Sum.inl (i, j))) =
x.moveLeft i * y + x * y.moveRight j - x.moveLeft i * y.moveRight j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveRight_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveRight (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xR i * yL j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveRight_inr {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveRight (toRightMovesMul (Sum.inr (i, j))) =
x.moveRight i * y + x * y.moveLeft j - x.moveRight i * y.moveLeft j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk_mul_moveLeft_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(-(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR)).moveLeft (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
-(xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xL i * yR j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk_mul_moveLeft_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(-(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR)).moveLeft (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
-(xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xR i * yL j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk_mul_moveRight_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(-(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR)).moveRight (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
-(xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xL i * yL j) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk_mul_moveRight_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(-(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR)).moveRight (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
-(xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xR i * yR j) :=
rfl
theorem leftMoves_mul_cases {x y : PGame} (k) {P : (x * y).LeftMoves → Prop}
(hl : ∀ ix iy, P <| toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inl ⟨ix, iy⟩))
(hr : ∀ jx jy, P <| toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inr ⟨jx, jy⟩)) : P k := by
rw [← toLeftMovesMul.apply_symm_apply k]
rcases toLeftMovesMul.symm k with (⟨ix, iy⟩ | ⟨jx, jy⟩)
· apply hl
· apply hr
theorem rightMoves_mul_cases {x y : PGame} (k) {P : (x * y).RightMoves → Prop}
(hl : ∀ ix jy, P <| toRightMovesMul (Sum.inl ⟨ix, jy⟩))
(hr : ∀ jx iy, P <| toRightMovesMul (Sum.inr ⟨jx, iy⟩)) : P k := by
rw [← toRightMovesMul.apply_symm_apply k]
rcases toRightMovesMul.symm k with (⟨ix, iy⟩ | ⟨jx, jy⟩)
· apply hl
· apply hr
/-- `x * y` and `y * x` have the same moves. -/
protected lemma mul_comm (x y : PGame) : x * y ≡ y * x :=
match x, y with
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩, ⟨yl, yr, yL, yR⟩ => by
refine Identical.of_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).sumCongr (Equiv.prodComm _ _))
((Equiv.sumComm _ _).trans ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).sumCongr (Equiv.prodComm _ _))) ?_ ?_ <;>
· rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;>
exact ((((PGame.mul_comm _ (mk _ _ _ _)).add (PGame.mul_comm (mk _ _ _ _) _)).trans
(PGame.add_comm _ _)).sub (PGame.mul_comm _ _))
termination_by (x, y)
/-- `x * y` and `y * x` have the same moves. -/
def mulCommRelabelling (x y : PGame.{u}) : x * y ≡r y * x :=
match x, y with
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩, ⟨yl, yr, yL, yR⟩ => by
refine ⟨Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _),
(Equiv.sumComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _)), ?_, ?_⟩
<;>
rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩) <;>
{ dsimp
exact ((addCommRelabelling _ _).trans <|
(mulCommRelabelling _ _).addCongr (mulCommRelabelling _ _)).subCongr
(mulCommRelabelling _ _) }
termination_by (x, y)
theorem quot_mul_comm (x y : PGame.{u}) : (⟦x * y⟧ : Game) = ⟦y * x⟧ :=
game_eq (x.mul_comm y).equiv
/-- `x * y` is equivalent to `y * x`. -/
theorem mul_comm_equiv (x y : PGame) : x * y ≈ y * x :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_mul_comm _ _
instance isEmpty_leftMoves_mul (x y : PGame.{u})
[IsEmpty (x.LeftMoves × y.LeftMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.RightMoves)] :
IsEmpty (x * y).LeftMoves := by
cases x
cases y
assumption
instance isEmpty_rightMoves_mul (x y : PGame.{u})
[IsEmpty (x.LeftMoves × y.RightMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.LeftMoves)] :
IsEmpty (x * y).RightMoves := by
cases x
cases y
assumption
/-- `x * 0` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
protected lemma mul_zero (x : PGame) : x * 0 ≡ 0 := identical_zero _
/-- `x * 0` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
def mulZeroRelabelling (x : PGame) : x * 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
/-- `x * 0` is equivalent to `0`. -/
theorem mul_zero_equiv (x : PGame) : x * 0 ≈ 0 :=
x.mul_zero.equiv
@[simp]
theorem quot_mul_zero (x : PGame) : (⟦x * 0⟧ : Game) = 0 :=
game_eq x.mul_zero_equiv
/-- `0 * x` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
protected lemma zero_mul (x : PGame) : 0 * x ≡ 0 := identical_zero _
/-- `0 * x` has exactly the same moves as `0`. -/
def zeroMulRelabelling (x : PGame) : 0 * x ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
/-- `0 * x` is equivalent to `0`. -/
theorem zero_mul_equiv (x : PGame) : 0 * x ≈ 0 :=
x.zero_mul.equiv
@[simp]
theorem quot_zero_mul (x : PGame) : (⟦0 * x⟧ : Game) = 0 :=
game_eq x.zero_mul_equiv
/-- `-x * y` and `-(x * y)` have the same moves. -/
def negMulRelabelling (x y : PGame.{u}) : -x * y ≡r -(x * y) :=
match x, y with
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩, ⟨yl, yr, yL, yR⟩ => by
refine ⟨Equiv.sumComm _ _, Equiv.sumComm _ _, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩) <;>
· dsimp
apply ((negAddRelabelling _ _).trans _).symm
apply ((negAddRelabelling _ _).trans (Relabelling.addCongr _ _)).subCongr
-- Porting note: we used to just do `<;> exact (negMulRelabelling _ _).symm` from here.
· exact (negMulRelabelling _ _).symm
· exact (negMulRelabelling _ _).symm
-- Porting note: not sure what has gone wrong here.
-- The goal is hideous here, and the `exact` doesn't work,
-- but if we just `change` it to look like the mathlib3 goal then we're fine!?
change -(mk xl xr xL xR * _) ≡r _
exact (negMulRelabelling _ _).symm
termination_by (x, y)
/-- `x * -y` and `-(x * y)` have the same moves. -/
@[simp]
lemma mul_neg (x y : PGame) : x * -y = -(x * y) :=
match x, y with
| mk xl xr xL xR, mk yl yr yL yR => by
refine ext rfl rfl ?_ ?_ <;> rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩) _ ⟨rfl⟩
all_goals
dsimp
rw [PGame.neg_sub', PGame.neg_add]
congr
exacts [mul_neg _ (mk ..), mul_neg .., mul_neg ..]
termination_by (x, y)
/-- `-x * y` and `-(x * y)` have the same moves. -/
lemma neg_mul (x y : PGame) : -x * y ≡ -(x * y) :=
((PGame.mul_comm _ _).trans (of_eq (mul_neg _ _))).trans (PGame.mul_comm _ _).neg
@[simp]
theorem quot_neg_mul (x y : PGame) : (⟦-x * y⟧ : Game) = -⟦x * y⟧ :=
game_eq (x.neg_mul y).equiv
/-- `x * -y` and `-(x * y)` have the same moves. -/
def mulNegRelabelling (x y : PGame) : x * -y ≡r -(x * y) :=
(mulCommRelabelling x _).trans <| (negMulRelabelling _ x).trans (mulCommRelabelling y x).negCongr
theorem quot_mul_neg (x y : PGame) : ⟦x * -y⟧ = (-⟦x * y⟧ : Game) :=
game_eq (by rw [mul_neg])
theorem quot_neg_mul_neg (x y : PGame) : ⟦-x * -y⟧ = (⟦x * y⟧ : Game) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem quot_left_distrib (x y z : PGame) : (⟦x * (y + z)⟧ : Game) = ⟦x * y⟧ + ⟦x * z⟧ :=
match x, y, z with
| mk xl xr xL xR, mk yl yr yL yR, mk zl zr zL zR => by
let x := mk xl xr xL xR
let y := mk yl yr yL yR
let z := mk zl zr zL zR
refine quot_eq_of_mk'_quot_eq ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· fconstructor
· rintro (⟨_, _ | _⟩ | ⟨_, _ | _⟩) <;>
-- Porting note: we've increased `maxDepth` here from `5` to `6`.
-- Likely this sort of off-by-one error is just a change in the implementation
-- of `solve_by_elim`.
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 6 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 6 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨_, _ | _⟩ | ⟨_, _ | _⟩) <;> rfl
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> rfl
· fconstructor
· rintro (⟨_, _ | _⟩ | ⟨_, _ | _⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 6 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 6 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨_, _ | _⟩ | ⟨_, _ | _⟩) <;> rfl
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> rfl
-- Porting note: explicitly wrote out arguments to each recursive
-- quot_left_distrib reference below, because otherwise the decreasing_by block
-- failed. Previously, each branch ended with: `simp [quot_left_distrib]; abel`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2288
· rintro (⟨i, j | k⟩ | ⟨i, j | k⟩)
· change
⟦xL i * (y + z) + x * (yL j + z) - xL i * (yL j + z)⟧ =
⟦xL i * y + x * yL j - xL i * yL j + x * z⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
abel
· change
⟦xL i * (y + z) + x * (y + zL k) - xL i * (y + zL k)⟧ =
⟦x * y + (xL i * z + x * zL k - xL i * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
abel
· change
⟦xR i * (y + z) + x * (yR j + z) - xR i * (yR j + z)⟧ =
⟦xR i * y + x * yR j - xR i * yR j + x * z⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
abel
· change
⟦xR i * (y + z) + x * (y + zR k) - xR i * (y + zR k)⟧ =
⟦x * y + (xR i * z + x * zR k - xR i * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
abel
· rintro (⟨i, j | k⟩ | ⟨i, j | k⟩)
· change
⟦xL i * (y + z) + x * (yR j + z) - xL i * (yR j + z)⟧ =
⟦xL i * y + x * yR j - xL i * yR j + x * z⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
abel
· change
⟦xL i * (y + z) + x * (y + zR k) - xL i * (y + zR k)⟧ =
⟦x * y + (xL i * z + x * zR k - xL i * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
abel
· change
⟦xR i * (y + z) + x * (yL j + z) - xR i * (yL j + z)⟧ =
⟦xR i * y + x * yL j - xR i * yL j + x * z⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
abel
· change
⟦xR i * (y + z) + x * (y + zL k) - xR i * (y + zL k)⟧ =
⟦x * y + (xR i * z + x * zL k - xR i * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_left_distrib (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
abel
termination_by (x, y, z)
/-- `x * (y + z)` is equivalent to `x * y + x * z`. -/
theorem left_distrib_equiv (x y z : PGame) : x * (y + z) ≈ x * y + x * z :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_left_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem quot_left_distrib_sub (x y z : PGame) : (⟦x * (y - z)⟧ : Game) = ⟦x * y⟧ - ⟦x * z⟧ := by
change (⟦x * (y + -z)⟧ : Game) = ⟦x * y⟧ + -⟦x * z⟧
rw [quot_left_distrib, quot_mul_neg]
@[simp]
theorem quot_right_distrib (x y z : PGame) : (⟦(x + y) * z⟧ : Game) = ⟦x * z⟧ + ⟦y * z⟧ := by
simp only [quot_mul_comm, quot_left_distrib]
/-- `(x + y) * z` is equivalent to `x * z + y * z`. -/
theorem right_distrib_equiv (x y z : PGame) : (x + y) * z ≈ x * z + y * z :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_right_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem quot_right_distrib_sub (x y z : PGame) : (⟦(y - z) * x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y * x⟧ - ⟦z * x⟧ := by
change (⟦(y + -z) * x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y * x⟧ + -⟦z * x⟧
rw [quot_right_distrib, quot_neg_mul]
/-- `x * 1` has the same moves as `x`. -/
def mulOneRelabelling : ∀ x : PGame.{u}, x * 1 ≡r x
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ => by
-- Porting note: the next four lines were just `unfold has_one.one,`
show _ * One.one ≡r _
unfold One.one
unfold instOnePGame
change mk _ _ _ _ * mk _ _ _ _ ≡r _
refine ⟨(Equiv.sumEmpty _ _).trans (Equiv.prodPUnit _),
(Equiv.emptySum _ _).trans (Equiv.prodPUnit _), ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
(try rintro (⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩)) <;>
{ dsimp
apply (Relabelling.subCongr (Relabelling.refl _) (mulZeroRelabelling _)).trans
rw [sub_zero_eq_add_zero]
exact (addZeroRelabelling _).trans <|
(((mulOneRelabelling _).addCongr (mulZeroRelabelling _)).trans <| addZeroRelabelling _) }
/-- `1 * x` has the same moves as `x`. -/
protected lemma one_mul : ∀ (x : PGame), 1 * x ≡ x
| ⟨xl, xr, xL, xR⟩ => by
refine Identical.of_equiv ((Equiv.sumEmpty _ _).trans (Equiv.punitProd _))
((Equiv.sumEmpty _ _).trans (Equiv.punitProd _)) ?_ ?_ <;>
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩)
exact ((((PGame.zero_mul (mk _ _ _ _)).add (PGame.one_mul _)).trans (PGame.zero_add _)).sub
(PGame.zero_mul _)).trans (PGame.sub_zero _)
/-- `x * 1` has the same moves as `x`. -/
protected lemma mul_one (x : PGame) : x * 1 ≡ x := (x.mul_comm _).trans x.one_mul
@[simp]
theorem quot_mul_one (x : PGame) : (⟦x * 1⟧ : Game) = ⟦x⟧ :=
game_eq x.mul_one.equiv
/-- `x * 1` is equivalent to `x`. -/
theorem mul_one_equiv (x : PGame) : x * 1 ≈ x :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_mul_one x
/-- `1 * x` has the same moves as `x`. -/
def oneMulRelabelling (x : PGame) : 1 * x ≡r x :=
(mulCommRelabelling 1 x).trans <| mulOneRelabelling x
@[simp]
theorem quot_one_mul (x : PGame) : (⟦1 * x⟧ : Game) = ⟦x⟧ :=
game_eq x.one_mul.equiv
/-- `1 * x` is equivalent to `x`. -/
theorem one_mul_equiv (x : PGame) : 1 * x ≈ x :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_one_mul x
theorem quot_mul_assoc (x y z : PGame) : (⟦x * y * z⟧ : Game) = ⟦x * (y * z)⟧ :=
match x, y, z with
| mk xl xr xL xR, mk yl yr yL yR, mk zl zr zL zR => by
let x := mk xl xr xL xR
let y := mk yl yr yL yR
let z := mk zl zr zL zR
refine quot_eq_of_mk'_quot_eq ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· fconstructor
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ | ⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩) <;>
-- Porting note: as above, increased the `maxDepth` here by 1.
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ | ⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩) <;> rfl
· rintro (⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩) <;> rfl
· fconstructor
· rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ | ⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
· rintro (⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩) <;>
solve_by_elim (config := { maxDepth := 8 }) [Sum.inl, Sum.inr, Prod.mk]
| · rintro (⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ | ⟨⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩) <;> rfl
· rintro (⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩ | ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩⟩) <;> rfl
-- Porting note: explicitly wrote out arguments to each recursive
-- quot_mul_assoc reference below, because otherwise the decreasing_by block
-- failed. Each branch previously ended with: `simp [quot_mul_assoc]; abel`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2288
· rintro (⟨⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩, k⟩ | ⟨⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩, k⟩)
· change
⟦(xL i * y + x * yL j - xL i * yL j) * z + x * y * zL k -
(xL i * y + x * yL j - xL i * yL j) * zL k⟧ =
⟦xL i * (y * z) + x * (yL j * z + y * zL k - yL j * zL k) -
xL i * (yL j * z + y * zL k - yL j * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yL j) (zL k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xR i * y + x * yR j - xR i * yR j) * z + x * y * zL k -
(xR i * y + x * yR j - xR i * yR j) * zL k⟧ =
⟦xR i * (y * z) + x * (yR j * z + y * zL k - yR j * zL k) -
xR i * (yR j * z + y * zL k - yR j * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yR j) (zL k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xL i * y + x * yR j - xL i * yR j) * z + x * y * zR k -
(xL i * y + x * yR j - xL i * yR j) * zR k⟧ =
⟦xL i * (y * z) + x * (yR j * z + y * zR k - yR j * zR k) -
xL i * (yR j * z + y * zR k - yR j * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yR j) (zR k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xR i * y + x * yL j - xR i * yL j) * z + x * y * zR k -
(xR i * y + x * yL j - xR i * yL j) * zR k⟧ =
⟦xR i * (y * z) + x * (yL j * z + y * zR k - yL j * zR k) -
xR i * (yL j * z + y * zR k - yL j * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yL j) (zR k)]
abel
· rintro (⟨⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩, k⟩ | ⟨⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩, k⟩)
· change
⟦(xL i * y + x * yL j - xL i * yL j) * z + x * y * zR k -
(xL i * y + x * yL j - xL i * yL j) * zR k⟧ =
⟦xL i * (y * z) + x * (yL j * z + y * zR k - yL j * zR k) -
xL i * (yL j * z + y * zR k - yL j * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yL j) (zR k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xR i * y + x * yR j - xR i * yR j) * z + x * y * zR k -
(xR i * y + x * yR j - xR i * yR j) * zR k⟧ =
⟦xR i * (y * z) + x * (yR j * z + y * zR k - yR j * zR k) -
xR i * (yR j * z + y * zR k - yR j * zR k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (zR k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yR j) (zR k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xL i * y + x * yR j - xL i * yR j) * z + x * y * zL k -
(xL i * y + x * yR j - xL i * yR j) * zL k⟧ =
⟦xL i * (y * z) + x * (yR j * z + y * zL k - yR j * zL k) -
xL i * (yR j * z + y * zL k - yR j * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yR j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yR j) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xL i) (yR j) (zL k)]
abel
· change
⟦(xR i * y + x * yL j - xR i * yL j) * z + x * y * zL k -
(xR i * y + x * yL j - xR i * yL j) * zL k⟧ =
⟦xR i * (y * z) + x * (yL j * z + y * zL k - yL j * zL k) -
xR i * (yL j * z + y * zL k - yL j * zL k)⟧
simp only [quot_sub, quot_add, quot_right_distrib_sub, quot_right_distrib,
quot_left_distrib_sub, quot_left_distrib]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yL j) (mk zl zr zL zR)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (mk yl yr yL yR) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (mk xl xr xL xR) (yL j) (zL k)]
rw [quot_mul_assoc (xR i) (yL j) (zL k)]
abel
termination_by (x, y, z)
/-- `x * y * z` is equivalent to `x * (y * z)`. -/
theorem mul_assoc_equiv (x y z : PGame) : x * y * z ≈ x * (y * z) :=
Quotient.exact <| quot_mul_assoc _ _ _
/-- The left options of `x * y` of the first kind, i.e. of the form `xL * y + x * yL - xL * yL`. -/
def mulOption (x y : PGame) (i : LeftMoves x) (j : LeftMoves y) : PGame :=
x.moveLeft i * y + x * y.moveLeft j - x.moveLeft i * y.moveLeft j
/-- Any left option of `x * y` of the first kind is also a left option of `x * -(-y)` of
the first kind. -/
lemma mulOption_neg_neg {x} (y) {i j} :
mulOption x y i j = mulOption x (-(-y)) i (toLeftMovesNeg <| toRightMovesNeg j) := by
simp [mulOption]
/-- The left options of `x * y` agree with that of `y * x` up to equivalence. -/
lemma mulOption_symm (x y) {i j} : ⟦mulOption x y i j⟧ = (⟦mulOption y x j i⟧ : Game) := by
dsimp only [mulOption, quot_sub, quot_add]
rw [add_comm]
congr 1
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Basic.lean | 693 | 841 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl (p q : Submodule R E) (h : IsCompl p q)`:
the projection of a module `E` to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`;
it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `Submodule.isComplEquivProj p`: equivalence between submodules `q`
such that `IsCompl p q` and projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by rw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotientEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (E ⧸ p) ≃ₗ[R] q :=
LinearEquiv.symm <|
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.mkQ.comp q.subtype)
⟨by rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_comp, ker_mkQ, disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot.1 h.symm.disjoint], by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_comp, range_subtype, map_mkQ_eq_top, h.sup_eq_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
-- Porting note: type ascriptions needed on the RHS
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (Quotient.mk x : E ⧸ p) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h (Quotient.mk x) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E ⧸ p) :
(Quotient.mk (quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h x) : E ⧸ p) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_apply x
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (p × q) ≃ₗ[R] E := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype)
constructor
· rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range, ker_subtype, ker_subtype, prod_bot]
rw [range_subtype, range_subtype]
exact h.1
· rw [← range_eq_top, ← sup_eq_range, h.sup_eq_top]
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h : p × q →ₗ[R] E) = p.subtype.coprod q.subtype := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p × q) :
prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h x = x.1 + x.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (x, 0) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (0, x) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).1 = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_left _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).2 = 0 ↔ x ∈ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
LinearEquiv.prodComm R q p ≪≫ₗ prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h = prodEquivOfIsCompl q p h.symm :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => add_comm _ _
/-- Projection to a submodule along a complement.
See also `LinearMap.linearProjOfIsCompl`. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : E →ₗ[R] p :=
LinearMap.fst R p q ∘ₗ ↑(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = x := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_range (h : IsCompl p q) : range (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_of_proj (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_surjective (h : IsCompl p q) :
Function.Surjective (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) :=
range_eq_top.mp (linearProjOfIsCompl_range h)
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
(linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h).2 hx
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' h x x.2
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_ker (h : IsCompl p q) : ker (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = q :=
ext fun _ => mem_ker.trans (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype (h : IsCompl p q) :
(linearProjOfIsCompl p q h).comp p.subtype = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃! u : p × q, (u.fst : E) + u.snd = x :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hc).toEquiv.bijective.existsUnique _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃ (u : p) (v : q), (u : E) + v = x ∧ ∀ (r : p) (s : q), (r : E) + s = x → r = u ∧ s = v :=
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod hc x
⟨u.1, u.2, hu₁, fun r s hrs => Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 (hu₂ ⟨r, s⟩ hrs)⟩
theorem linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self (hpq : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
(p.linearProjOfIsCompl q hpq x + q.linearProjOfIsCompl p hpq.symm x : E) = x := by
dsimp only [linearProjOfIsCompl]
rw [← prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq]
exact (prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq).apply_symm_apply x
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/-- Projection to the image of an injection along a complement.
This has an advantage over `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl` in that it allows the user better
definitional control over the type. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
(LinearEquiv.ofInjective i hi).symm ∘ₗ (LinearMap.range i).linearProjOfIsCompl q h
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) (x : F) :
linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h (i x) = x := by
let ix : LinearMap.range i := ⟨i x, mem_range_self i x⟩
change linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h ix = x
rw [linearProjOfIsCompl, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left, Subtype.ext_iff,
LinearEquiv.ofInjective_apply]
/-- Given linear maps `φ` and `ψ` from complement submodules, `LinearMap.ofIsCompl` is
the induced linear map over the entire module. -/
def ofIsCompl {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q) (φ : p →ₗ[R] F) (ψ : q →ₗ[R] F) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
LinearMap.coprod φ ψ ∘ₗ ↑(Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_left_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (u : p) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (u : E) = φ u := by simp [ofIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_right_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (v : q) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (v : E) = ψ v := by simp [ofIsCompl]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : ∀ u, φ u = χ u) (hψ : ∀ u, ψ u = χ u) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ := by
| ext x
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 238 | 239 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
/-!
# UV-compressions
This file defines UV-compression. It is an operation on a set family that reduces its shadow.
UV-compressing `a : α` along `u v : α` means replacing `a` by `(a ⊔ u) \ v` if `a` and `u` are
disjoint and `v ≤ a`. In some sense, it's moving `a` from `v` to `u`.
UV-compressions are immensely useful to prove the Kruskal-Katona theorem. The idea is that
compressing a set family might decrease the size of its shadow, so iterated compressions hopefully
minimise the shadow.
## Main declarations
* `UV.compress`: `compress u v a` is `a` compressed along `u` and `v`.
* `UV.compression`: `compression u v s` is the compression of the set family `s` along `u` and `v`.
It is the compressions of the elements of `s` whose compression is not already in `s` along with
the element whose compression is already in `s`. This way of splitting into what moves and what
does not ensures the compression doesn't squash the set family, which is proved by
`UV.card_compression`.
* `UV.card_shadow_compression_le`: Compressing reduces the size of the shadow. This is a key fact in
the proof of Kruskal-Katona.
## Notation
`𝓒` (typed with `\MCC`) is notation for `UV.compression` in locale `FinsetFamily`.
## Notes
Even though our emphasis is on `Finset α`, we define UV-compressions more generally in a generalized
boolean algebra, so that one can use it for `Set α`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, UV-compression, shadow
-/
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- UV-compression is injective on the elements it moves. See `UV.compress`. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
/-! ### UV-compression in generalized boolean algebras -/
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableLE α] {s : Finset α} {u v a : α}
/-- UV-compressing `a` means removing `v` from it and adding `u` if `a` and `u` are disjoint and
`v ≤ a` (it replaces the `v` part of `a` by the `u` part). Else, UV-compressing `a` doesn't do
anything. This is most useful when `u` and `v` are disjoint finsets of the same size. -/
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
/-- An element can be compressed to any other element by removing/adding the differences. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
/-- Compressing an element is idempotent. -/
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_right.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- To UV-compress a set family, we compress each of its elements, except that we don't want to
reduce the cardinality, so we keep all elements whose compression is already present. -/
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∈ s} ∪ {a ∈ s.image <| compress u v | a ∉ s}
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
/-- `IsCompressed u v s` expresses that `s` is UV-compressed. -/
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
/-- UV-compression is injective on the sets that are not UV-compressed. -/
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑{a ∈ s | compress u v a ∉ s} := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
/-- `a` is in the UV-compressed family iff it's in the original and its compression is in the
original, or it's not in the original but it's the compression of something in the original. -/
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
@[simp]
theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
| · refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 156 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdjoinRoot
/-!
# Bivariate polynomials
This file introduces the notation `R[X][Y]` for the polynomial ring `R[X][X]` in two variables,
and the notation `Y` for the second variable, in the `Polynomial.Bivariate` scope.
It also defines `Polynomial.evalEval` for the evaluation of a bivariate polynomial at a point
on the affine plane, which is a ring homomorphism (`Polynomial.evalEvalRingHom`), as well as
the abbreviation `CC` to view a constant in the base ring `R` as a bivariate polynomial.
-/
/-- The notation `Y` for `X` in the `Polynomial` scope. -/
scoped[Polynomial.Bivariate] notation3:max "Y" => Polynomial.X (R := Polynomial _)
/-- The notation `R[X][Y]` for `R[X][X]` in the `Polynomial` scope. -/
scoped[Polynomial.Bivariate] notation3:max R "[X][Y]" => Polynomial (Polynomial R)
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
namespace Polynomial
noncomputable section
variable {R S : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `evalEval x y p` is the evaluation `p(x,y)` of a two-variable polynomial `p : R[X][Y]`. -/
abbrev evalEval (x y : R) (p : R[X][Y]) : R := eval x (eval (C y) p)
/-- A constant viewed as a polynomial in two variables. -/
abbrev CC (r : R) : R[X][Y] := C (C r)
lemma evalEval_C (x y : R) (p : R[X]) : (C p).evalEval x y = p.eval x := by
rw [evalEval, eval_C]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_CC (x y : R) (p : R) : (CC p).evalEval x y = p := by
rw [evalEval_C, eval_C]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_zero (x y : R) : (0 : R[X][Y]).evalEval x y = 0 := by
simp only [evalEval, eval_zero]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_one (x y : R) : (1 : R[X][Y]).evalEval x y = 1 := by
simp only [evalEval, eval_one]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_natCast (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X][Y]).evalEval x y = n := by
simp only [evalEval, eval_natCast]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_X (x y : R) : X.evalEval x y = y := by
rw [evalEval, eval_X, eval_C]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_add (x y : R) (p q : R[X][Y]) :
(p + q).evalEval x y = p.evalEval x y + q.evalEval x y := by
| simp only [evalEval, eval_add]
lemma evalEval_sum (x y : R) (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → R[X][Y]) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Bivariate.lean | 69 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
| rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 359 | 369 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
| ‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 202 | 207 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol
/-!
# A `norm_num` extension for Jacobi and Legendre symbols
We extend the `norm_num` tactic so that it can be used to provably compute
the value of the Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` or the Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` when
the arguments are numerals.
## Implementation notes
We use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol to compute the value of `J(a | b)`
efficiently, roughly comparable in effort with the euclidean algorithm for the computation
of the gcd of `a` and `b`. More precisely, the computation is done in the following steps.
* Use `J(a | 0) = 1` (an artifact of the definition) and `J(a | 1) = 1` to deal
with corner cases.
* Use `J(a | b) = J(a % b | b)` to reduce to the case that `a` is a natural number.
We define a version of the Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers for use in
the following steps; see `NormNum.jacobiSymNat`. (But we'll continue to write `J(a | b)`
in this description.)
* Remove powers of two from `b`. This is done via `J(2a | 2b) = 0` and
`J(2a+1 | 2b) = J(2a+1 | b)` (another artifact of the definition).
* Now `0 ≤ a < b` and `b` is odd. If `b = 1`, then the value is `1`.
If `a = 0` (and `b > 1`), then the value is `0`. Otherwise, we remove powers of two from `a`
via `J(4a | b) = J(a | b)` and `J(2a | b) = ±J(a | b)`, where the sign is determined
by the residue class of `b` mod 8, to reduce to `a` odd.
* Once `a` is odd, we use Quadratic Reciprocity (QR) in the form
`J(a | b) = ±J(b % a | a)`, where the sign is determined by the residue classes
of `a` and `b` mod 4. We are then back in the previous case.
We provide customized versions of these results for the various reduction steps,
where we encode the residue classes mod 2, mod 4, or mod 8 by using hypotheses like
`a % n = b`. In this way, the only divisions we have to compute and prove
are the ones occurring in the use of QR above.
-/
section Lemmas
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments. -/
def jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
jacobiSym a b
/-!
### API Lemmas
We repeat part of the API for `jacobiSym` with `NormNum.jacobiSymNat` and without implicit
arguments, in a form that is suitable for constructing proofs in `norm_num`.
-/
/-- Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_left (b : ℕ) (hb : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) : jacobiSymNat 0 b = 0 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_zero, jacobiSym.zero_left ?_]
calc
1 < 2 * 1 := by decide
_ ≤ 2 * (b / 2) :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.succ_le.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb)))
_ ≤ b := Nat.mul_div_le b 2
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_left (b : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat 1 b = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_one, jacobiSym.one_left]
/-- Turn a Legendre symbol into a Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) (pp : Fact p.Prime) (a r : ℤ)
(hr : IsInt (jacobiSym a p) r) : IsInt (legendreSym p a) r := by
rwa [@jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p pp a]
/-- The value depends only on the residue class of `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem JacobiSym.mod_left (a : ℤ) (b ab' : ℕ) (ab r b' : ℤ) (hb' : (b : ℤ) = b')
(hab : a % b' = ab) (h : (ab' : ℤ) = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab' b = r) : jacobiSym a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mod_left, hb', hab, ← h]
theorem jacobiSymNat.mod_left (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (hab : a % b = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab b = r) :
jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSymNat, _root_.jacobiSym.mod_left a b, ← hab]; rfl
/-- The symbol vanishes when both entries are even (and `b / 2 ≠ 0`). -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_even (a b : ℕ) (hb₀ : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) (ha : a % 2 = 0)
(hb₁ : b % 2 = 0) : jacobiSymNat a b = 0 := by
refine jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff.mpr
⟨ne_of_gt ((Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb₀)).trans_le (Nat.div_le_self b 2)),
fun hf => ?_⟩
have h : 2 ∣ a.gcd b := Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha) (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb₁)
change 2 ∣ (a : ℤ).gcd b at h
rw [hf, ← even_iff_two_dvd] at h
exact Nat.not_even_one h
/-- When `a` is odd and `b` is even, we can replace `b` by `b / 2`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.odd_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 0) (hc : b / 2 = c)
(hr : jacobiSymNat a c = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
have ha' : legendreSym 2 a = 1 := by
simp only [legendreSym.mod 2 a, Int.ofNat_mod_ofNat, ha]
decide
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc')
· rw [← hr, Nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb) hc]
· haveI : NeZero c := ⟨hc'⟩
-- for `jacobiSym.mul_right`
rwa [← Nat.mod_add_div b 2, hb, hc, Nat.zero_add, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mul_right,
← jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym, ha', one_mul]
/-- If `a` is divisible by `4` and `b` is odd, then we can remove the factor `4` from `a`. -/
| theorem jacobiSymNat.double_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 0) (hb : b % 2 = 1)
(hc : a / 4 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
exact (jacobiSym.div_four_left (mod_cast ha) hb).symm
/-- If `a` is even and `b` is odd, then we can remove a factor `2` from `a`,
but we may have to change the sign, depending on `b % 8`.
We give one version for each of the four odd residue classes mod `8`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_odd₁ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 1)
(hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean | 121 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
/-!
# Congruences modulo a natural number
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [MOD n]` on the natural numbers,
and proves basic properties about it such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem
`modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul`.
## Notations
`a ≡ b [MOD n]` is notation for `nat.ModEq n a b`, which is defined to mean `a % n = b % n`.
## Tags
ModEq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Function.support
namespace Nat
/-- Modular equality. `n.ModEq a b`, or `a ≡ b [MOD n]`, means that `a - b` is a multiple of `n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℕ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [MOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℕ}
-- Since `ModEq` is semi-reducible, we need to provide the decidable instance manually
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (a % n = b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl]
protected theorem refl (a : ℕ) : a ≡ a [MOD n] := rfl
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [MOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [MOD n] → b ≡ c [MOD n] → a ≡ c [MOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : Trans (ModEq n) (ModEq n) (ModEq n) where
trans := Nat.ModEq.trans
protected theorem comm : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [MOD n] :=
⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
end ModEq
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by rw [ModEq, zero_mod, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_nat (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [MOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_nat (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [MOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_nat.symm
theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ (n : ℤ) ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mod,
Int.emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero, Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
alias ⟨ModEq.dvd, modEq_of_dvd⟩ := modEq_iff_dvd
/-- A variant of `modEq_iff_dvd` with `Nat` divisibility -/
theorem modEq_iff_dvd' (h : a ≤ b) : a ≡ b [MOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.ofNat_sub h]
theorem mod_modEq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [MOD n] :=
mod_mod _ _
namespace ModEq
lemma of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
modEq_of_dvd <| Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr d |>.trans h.dvd
protected theorem mul_left' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * n] := by
unfold ModEq at *; rw [mul_mod_mul_left, mul_mod_mul_left, h]
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD n] :=
(h.mul_left' _).of_dvd (dvd_mul_left _ _)
protected theorem mul_right' (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n * c] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left' c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [MOD n] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b]; exact h.mul_left c
@[gcongr]
protected theorem mul (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * d [MOD n] :=
(h₂.mul_left _).trans (h₁.mul_right _)
@[gcongr]
protected theorem pow (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a ^ m ≡ b ^ m [MOD n] := by
induction m with
| zero => rfl
| succ d hd =>
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ]
exact hd.mul h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_add, add_sub_add_comm]
exact Int.dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_left (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add h
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add_right (c : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n] :=
h.add ModEq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
c ≡ d [MOD n] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_add] at *
rw [add_sub_add_comm] at h₂
convert Int.dvd_sub h₂ h₁ using 1
rw [add_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [MOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [MOD n]) :
a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂
exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℕ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [MOD n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
/-- Cancel left multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_left`. -/
protected theorem mul_left_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.mul_sub]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_left_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c * a ≡ c * b [MOD c * m] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_left_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_left' _⟩
/-- Cancel right multiplication on both sides of the `≡` and in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication in the modulus, see `Nat.ModEq.of_mul_right`. -/
protected theorem mul_right_cancel' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] → a ≡ b [MOD m] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_mul, ← Int.sub_mul]
exact fun h => (Int.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hc) h)
protected theorem mul_right_cancel_iff' {a b c m : ℕ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ≡ b * c [MOD m * c] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD m] :=
⟨ModEq.mul_right_cancel' hc, ModEq.mul_right' _⟩
/-- Cancel left multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling left multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_left_cancel'`. -/
lemma of_mul_left (m : ℕ) (h : a ≡ b [MOD m * n]) : a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd] at *
exact (dvd_mul_left (n : ℤ) (m : ℤ)).trans h
/-- Cancel right multiplication in the modulus.
For cancelling right multiplication on both sides of the `≡`, see `nat.modeq.mul_right_cancel'`. -/
lemma of_mul_right (m : ℕ) : a ≡ b [MOD n * m] → a ≡ b [MOD n] := mul_comm m n ▸ of_mul_left _
theorem of_div (h : a / c ≡ b / c [MOD m / c]) (ha : c ∣ a) (ha : c ∣ b) (ha : c ∣ m) :
a ≡ b [MOD m] := by convert h.mul_left' c <;> rwa [Nat.mul_div_cancel']
end ModEq
lemma modEq_sub (h : b ≤ a) : a ≡ b [MOD a - b] := (modEq_of_dvd <| by rw [Int.ofNat_sub h]).symm
lemma modEq_one : a ≡ b [MOD 1] := modEq_of_dvd <| one_dvd _
@[simp] lemma modEq_zero_iff : a ≡ b [MOD 0] ↔ a = b := by rw [ModEq, mod_zero, mod_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_modEq_left : n + a ≡ a [MOD n] := by rw [ModEq, add_mod_left]
@[simp] lemma add_modEq_right : a + n ≡ a [MOD n] := by rw [ModEq, add_mod_right]
namespace ModEq
theorem le_of_lt_add (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b + m) : a ≤ b :=
(le_total a b).elim id fun h3 =>
Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero
(eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt ((modEq_iff_dvd' h3).mp h1.symm) (by omega))
theorem add_le_of_lt (h1 : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : a < b) : a + m ≤ b :=
le_of_lt_add (add_modEq_right.trans h1) (by omega)
theorem dvd_iff (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (hdm : d ∣ m) : d ∣ a ↔ d ∣ b := by
simp only [← modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
replace h := h.of_dvd hdm
exact ⟨h.symm.trans, h.trans⟩
theorem gcd_eq (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) : gcd a m = gcd b m := by
have h1 := gcd_dvd_right a m
have h2 := gcd_dvd_right b m
exact
dvd_antisymm (dvd_gcd ((h.dvd_iff h1).mp (gcd_dvd_left a m)) h1)
(dvd_gcd ((h.dvd_iff h2).mpr (gcd_dvd_left b m)) h2)
lemma eq_of_abs_lt (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (h2 : |(b : ℤ) - a| < m) : a = b := by
apply Int.ofNat.inj
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]
exact Int.eq_zero_of_abs_lt_dvd h.dvd h2
lemma eq_of_lt_of_lt (h : a ≡ b [MOD m]) (ha : a < m) (hb : b < m) : a = b :=
h.eq_of_abs_lt <| Int.abs_sub_lt_of_lt_lt ha hb
/-- To cancel a common factor `c` from a `ModEq` we must divide the modulus `m` by `gcd m c` -/
lemma cancel_left_div_gcd (hm : 0 < m) (h : c * a ≡ c * b [MOD m]) : a ≡ b [MOD m / gcd m c] := by
| let d := gcd m c
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ModEq.lean | 235 | 235 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
| split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 86 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
#s = #((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) := by rw [this]
_ = #(range n).attach := ?_
_ = #(range n) := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : #s = #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #s.attach := card_attach.symm
_ = #(s.attach.image fun a ↦ i a.1 a.2) := Eq.symm ?_
_ = #t := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : #s = #t := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : #s = #t :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : #s = #t :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : #s = #t := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
#s = #t := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
lemma card_le_card_of_injOn (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn f) :
#s ≤ #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #(s.image f) := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ #t := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {f : s → t} (hf : f.Injective) : #s ≤ #t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩
· simp
· classical
let f' : α → β := fun a => f (if ha : a ∈ s then ⟨a, ha⟩ else ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩)
apply card_le_card_of_injOn f'
· aesop
· intro a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂ haa
rw [mem_coe] at ha₁ ha₂
simp only [f', ha₁, ha₂, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at haa
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (hf haa)
lemma card_le_card_of_surjOn (f : α → β) (hf : Set.SurjOn f s t) : #t ≤ #s := by
classical unfold Set.SurjOn at hf; exact (card_le_card (mod_cast hf)).trans card_image_le
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : #t < #s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_injOn f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ #s :=
calc
n = #(range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ #s := card_le_card_of_injOn f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa)
lemma surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hinj : Set.InjOn f s)
(hst : #t ≤ #s) : Set.SurjOn f s t := by
classical
suffices s.image f = t by simp [← this, Set.SurjOn]
have : s.image f ⊆ t := by aesop (add simp Finset.subset_iff)
exact eq_of_subset_of_card_le this (hst.trans_eq (card_image_of_injOn hinj).symm)
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : #t ≤ #s) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hinj' : Set.InjOn f' s.attach := fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ Subtype.ext (hinj _ _ x.2 y.2 hxy)
have hmapsto' : Set.MapsTo f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ hf _ _
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le _ hmapsto' hinj' (by rwa [card_attach]) hb
exact ⟨a, a.2, rfl⟩
lemma injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hsurj : Set.SurjOn f s t)
(hst : #s ≤ #t) : Set.InjOn f s := by
classical
have : s.image f = t := Finset.coe_injective <| by simp [hsurj.image_eq_of_mapsTo hf]
have : #(s.image f) = #t := by rw [this]
have : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := card_image_le
rw [← card_image_iff]
omega
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : #s ≤ #t) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hsurj' : Set.SurjOn f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ by simpa [f'] using hsurj x hx
have hinj' := injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le f' (fun x hx ↦ hf _ _) hsurj' (by simpa)
exact congrArg Subtype.val (@hinj' ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ (by simp) ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (by simp) ha₁a₂)
end bij
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : #(s.disjUnion t h) = #s + #t :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∪ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm _ 1]
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t := by rw [Nat.add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∩ t) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) ≤ #s + #t :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) = #t - #s := by
suffices #(t \ s) = #(t \ s ∪ s) - #s by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) + #s = #t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : #t - #s ≤ #(t \ s) :=
calc
#t - #s ≤ #t - #(s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = #(t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ #(t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : #s ≤ #(s \ t) + #t :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
theorem card_sdiff_add_card (s t : Finset α) : #(s \ t) + #t = #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : #s = #t) : #(s \ t) = #(t \ s) :=
Nat.add_right_cancel (m := #t) <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
theorem sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : (t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (card_le_card h')
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s := by
classical simpa [Finset.Nonempty] using sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card h
@[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s \ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter]
@[simp]
lemma card_inter_add_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s \ t) = #s := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_sdiff_add_card_inter]
/-- **Pigeonhole principle** for two finsets inside an ambient finset. -/
theorem inter_nonempty_of_card_lt_card_add_card (hts : t ⊆ s) (hus : u ⊆ s)
(hstu : #s < #t + #u) : (t ∩ u).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hstu
calc
_ = #(t ∪ u) := by simp [← card_union_add_card_inter, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.1 hstu]
_ ≤ #s := by gcongr; exact union_subset hts hus
end Lattice
theorem filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
(p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
#(s.filter p) + #(s.filter fun a ↦ ¬ p a) = #s := by
classical
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : #s ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ #t) :
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ #u = n := by
classical
refine Nat.decreasingInduction' ?_ hnt ⟨t, by simp [hst]⟩
intro k _ hnk ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : (u \ s).Nonempty := by rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff hu₁]; omega
simp only [mem_sdiff] at ha
exact ⟨u.erase a, by simp [subset_erase, erase_subset_iff_of_mem (hu₂ _), *]⟩
/-- We can shrink a set to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_subset_card_eq (hns : n ≤ #s) : ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.empty_subset (by simp) hns
theorem le_card_iff_exists_subset_card : n ≤ #s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, hst, ht⟩ => ht ▸ card_le_card hst⟩
exact exists_subset_card_eq h
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card [DecidableEq α] {X Y : Finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hXY : 2 * n < #(X ∪ Y)) : ∃ C : Finset α, n < #C ∧ (C ⊆ X ∨ C ⊆ Y) := by
have h₁ : #(X ∩ (Y \ X)) = 0 := Finset.card_eq_zero.mpr (Finset.inter_sdiff_self X Y)
have h₂ : #(X ∪ Y) = #X + #(Y \ X) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter X (Y \ X), Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union, h₁, Nat.add_zero]
rw [h₂, Nat.two_mul] at hXY
obtain h | h : n < #X ∨ n < #(Y \ X) := by contrapose! hXY; omega
· exact ⟨X, h, Or.inl (Finset.Subset.refl X)⟩
· exact ⟨Y \ X, h, Or.inr sdiff_subset⟩
/-! ### Explicit description of a finset from its card -/
theorem card_eq_one : #s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
cases s
simp only [Multiset.card_eq_one, Finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
theorem exists_eq_insert_iff [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ #s + 1 = #t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨subset_insert _ _, (card_insert_of_not_mem ha).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨hst, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, t \ s = {a} :=
card_eq_one.1 (by rw [card_sdiff hst, ← h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
refine
⟨a, fun hs => (?_ : a ∉ {a}) <| mem_singleton_self _, by
rw [insert_eq, ← ha, sdiff_union_of_subset hst]⟩
rw [← ha]
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hs
theorem card_le_one : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b := by
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
refine (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (card_pos.2 ⟨x, hx⟩)).le_iff_eq.trans (card_eq_one.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp
· exact fun h => ⟨x, eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hx, fun y hy => h _ hy _ hx⟩⟩
theorem card_le_one_iff : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [card_le_one]
tauto
theorem card_le_one_iff_subsingleton_coe : #s ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton (s : Type _) :=
card_le_one.trans (s : Set α).subsingleton_coe.symm
theorem card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton [Nonempty α] : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ x : α, s ⊆ {x} := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary α, empty_subset _⟩
· exact ⟨x, fun y hy => by rw [card_le_one.1 H y hy x hx, mem_singleton]⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← card_singleton x]
exact card_le_card hx
lemma exists_mem_ne (hs : 1 < #s) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
have : Nonempty α := ⟨a⟩
by_contra!
exact hs.not_le (card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton.2 ⟨a, subset_singleton_iff'.2 this⟩)
/-- A `Finset` of a subsingleton type has cardinality at most one. -/
theorem card_le_one_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ 1 :=
Finset.card_le_one_iff.2 fun {_ _ _ _} => Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem one_lt_card : 1 < #s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact card_le_one
theorem one_lt_card_iff : 1 < #s ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [one_lt_card]
simp only [exists_prop, exists_and_left]
theorem one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial : 1 < #s ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Finset.Nontrivial, ← Set.nontrivial_coe_sort,
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, card_le_one_iff_subsingleton_coe, coe_sort_coe]
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hs : 1 < #s) (a : α) : ∃ b, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ a := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := Finset.one_lt_card.mp hs
| by_cases ha : y = a
· exact ⟨x, hx, ne_of_ne_of_eq hxy ha⟩
· exact ⟨y, hy, ha⟩
/-- If a Finset in a Pi type is nontrivial (has at least two elements), then
its projection to some factor is nontrivial, and the fibers of the projection
are proper subsets. -/
lemma exists_of_one_lt_card_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, DecidableEq (α i)]
{s : Finset (∀ i, α i)} (h : 1 < #s) :
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 658 | 666 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one₀ ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, lineMap_vsub_left, smul_smul]
theorem Wbtw.trans_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left h₂
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z := by
refine ⟨h₁.trans_left h₂.wbtw, h₂.ne_left, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact h₂.right_ne ((wbtw_swap_right_iff R w).1 ⟨h₁, h₂.wbtw⟩)
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
rw [sbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_sbtw_left h₂
theorem Sbtw.trans_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_left h₂
theorem Sbtw.trans_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_right h₂
theorem Wbtw.trans_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) (h : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_right_iff.1 h₂)
theorem Wbtw.trans_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) (h : w ≠ x) : w ≠ y := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_left_iff.1 h₂)
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : x ≠ z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_left_ne h₂ h₁.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : w ≠ y :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_right_ne h₂ h₁.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroDivisors R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{ι : Type*} {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent R p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1)
(h : s.affineCombination R p w ∈
line[R, s.affineCombination R p w₁, s.affineCombination R p w₂])
{i : ι} (his : i ∈ s) (hs : Sbtw R (w₁ i) (w i) (w₂ i)) :
Sbtw R (s.affineCombination R p w₁) (s.affineCombination R p w)
(s.affineCombination R p w₂) := by
rw [affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair ha hw hw₁ hw₂] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr i his, sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff] at hs
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = (r • (w₂ - w₁) + w₁) i at hr
rw [s.affineCombination_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl]
rw [← s.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, s.weightedVSub_const_smul,
← s.affineCombination_vsub, ← lineMap_apply, sbtw_lineMap_iff, and_iff_left hs.2,
← @vsub_ne_zero V, s.affineCombination_vsub]
intro hz
have hw₁w₂ : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
refine hs.1 ?_
have ha' := ha s (w₁ - w₂) hw₁w₂ hz i his
rwa [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero] at ha'
end OrderedRing
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simp_rw [lineMap_apply]
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap; · simp
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap; · simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
simp only [vadd_vsub, smul_smul, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← sub_smul]
ring_nf
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ x) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, _⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply] using SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (z -ᵥ x) ht0
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (z -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨_, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_smul] using
SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right (z -ᵥ x) (sub_nonneg.2 ht1)
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
/-- Suppose lines from two vertices of a triangle to interior points of the opposite side meet at
`p`. Then `p` lies in the interior of the first (and by symmetry the other) segment from a
vertex to the point on the opposite side. -/
theorem sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{t : Affine.Triangle R P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) {p₁ p₂ p : P}
(h₁ : Sbtw R (t.points i₂) p₁ (t.points i₃)) (h₂ : Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p₂ (t.points i₃))
(h₁' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₁, p₁]) (h₂' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₂, p₂]) :
Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p p₁ := by
have h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₂
have h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₁
have h3 : ∀ i : Fin 3, i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ ∨ i = i₃ := by omega
have hu : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 3)) = {i₁, i₂, i₃} := by
clear h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂'
decide +revert
have hp : p ∈ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
have hle : line[R, t.points i₁, p₁] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem (mem_affineSpan R (Set.mem_range_self _)) ?_
have hle : line[R, t.points i₂, t.points i₃] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_mono R ?_
simp [Set.insert_subset_iff]
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁.wbtw.mem_affineSpan
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁'
have h₁i := h₁.mem_image_Ioo
have h₂i := h₂.mem_image_Ioo
rw [Set.mem_image] at h₁i h₂i
rcases h₁i with ⟨r₁, ⟨hr₁0, hr₁1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases h₂i with ⟨r₂, ⟨hr₂0, hr₂1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype hp with ⟨w, hw, rfl⟩
have h₁s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ hr₁0 hr₁1 h₁'
have h₂s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂.symm h₂₃ h₁₃ hr₂0 hr₂1 h₂'
rw [← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights R t.points
(Finset.mem_univ i₁),
← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights t.points (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _)] at h₁' ⊢
refine
Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair t.independent hw
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights R (Finset.mem_univ _))
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) _)
h₁' (Finset.mem_univ i₁) ?_
rw [Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self,
Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne h₁₂ h₁₃, sbtw_one_zero_iff]
have hs : ∀ i : Fin 3, SignType.sign (w i) = SignType.sign (w i₃) := by
intro i
rcases h3 i with (rfl | rfl | rfl)
· exact h₂s
· exact h₁s
· rfl
have hss : SignType.sign (∑ i, w i) = 1 := by simp [hw]
have hs' := sign_sum Finset.univ_nonempty (SignType.sign (w i₃)) fun i _ => hs i
rw [hs'] at hss
simp_rw [hss, sign_eq_one_iff] at hs
refine ⟨hs i₁, ?_⟩
rw [hu] at hw
rw [Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_singleton] at hw
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt] at hle
exact (hle.trans_lt (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (Left.add_pos (hs i₂) (hs i₃)))).ne' hw
· simpa using h₂₃
· simpa [not_or] using ⟨h₁₂, h₁₃⟩
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] {x y z : P}
variable {R}
lemma wbtw_iff_of_le {x y z : R} (hxz : x ≤ z) : Wbtw R x y z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ z := by
cases hxz.eq_or_lt with
| inl hxz =>
subst hxz
rw [← le_antisymm_iff, wbtw_self_iff, eq_comm]
| inr hxz =>
have hxz' : 0 < z - x := sub_pos.mpr hxz
let r := (y - x) / (z - x)
have hy : y = r * (z - x) + x := by simp [r, hxz'.ne']
simp [hy, wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right hxz', ← le_sub_iff_add_le,
mul_le_iff_le_one_left hxz', hxz.ne]
lemma Wbtw.of_le_of_le {x y z : R} (hxy : x ≤ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
(wbtw_iff_of_le (hxy.trans hyz)).mpr ⟨hxy, hyz⟩
lemma Sbtw.of_lt_of_lt {x y z : R} (hxy : x < y) (hyz : y < z) : Sbtw R x y z :=
⟨.of_le_of_le hxy.le hyz.le, hxy.ne', hyz.ne⟩
theorem wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ x = y ∨ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases hr0.lt_or_eq with (hr0' | rfl)
· rw [Set.mem_image]
refine .inr ⟨r⁻¹, (one_le_inv₀ hr0').2 hr1, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ hr0'.ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
· simp
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact wbtw_self_left _ _ _
· rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
refine ⟨r⁻¹, ⟨inv_nonneg.2 (zero_le_one.trans hr), inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ hr⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ (one_pos.trans_le hr).ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
(wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.1 h).resolve_left hne
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ line[R, x, y] := by
rcases h.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
theorem sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ x ≠ y ∧ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_ne, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩ := h.wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne h.left_ne
rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (hrlt | rfl)
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hrlt
· exfalso
simp at h
· rcases h with ⟨hne, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hr
refine
⟨wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.2
(Or.inr (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hr Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self))),
hne.symm, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub]
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul R (y -ᵥ x)]
rw [← sub_smul, smul_ne_zero_iff, vsub_ne_zero, sub_ne_zero]
exact ⟨hr.ne, hne.symm⟩
|
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) :=
(sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi.1 h).2
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ∈ line[R, x, y] :=
h.wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne h.left_ne
theorem wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ z = y ∨ x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici]
theorem Wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : z ≠ y) :
x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
h.symm.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 665 | 680 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective (map_one reverseOp)
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (map_mul reverseOp a b)
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, map_add]
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) :=
(ι_range_map_lift _ _).trans (LinearMap.range_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap
(involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, Submodule.map_pow, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_involute]
end Involute
section Reverse
theorem submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (reverseEquiv : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [reverse, reverseOp, Submodule.map_comp, ι_range_map_lift, LinearMap.range_comp,
← Submodule.map_comp]
exact Submodule.map_id _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_reverse :
| (LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, ι_range_map_reverse]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 241 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Lean.Meta.CongrTheorems
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Lemmas about units in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
We also define `Ring.inverse`, a globally defined function on any ring
(in fact any `MonoidWithZero`), which inverts units and sends non-units to zero.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered Equiv Subtype.restrict Multiplicative
variable {α M₀ G₀ : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Units
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero monoid with zero represented as an element
of the monoid is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] (u : M₀ˣ) : (u : M₀) ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one u.mul_inv
-- We can't use `mul_eq_zero` + `Units.ne_zero` in the next two lemmas because we don't assume
-- `Nonzero M₀`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : a * u = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_left h ↑u⁻¹, fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h u⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : ↑u * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_right (↑u⁻¹) h, mul_eq_zero_of_right (u : M₀)⟩
end Units
namespace IsUnit
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] {a : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.ne_zero
theorem mul_right_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a * b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.mul_right_eq_zero
theorem mul_left_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (hb : IsUnit b) : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hb
hu ▸ u.mul_left_eq_zero
end IsUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_zero_iff : IsUnit (0 : M₀) ↔ (0 : M₀) = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, a, (a0 : 0 * a = 1), _⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [zero_mul] at a0, fun h =>
@isUnit_of_subsingleton _ _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) 0⟩
theorem not_isUnit_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : ¬IsUnit (0 : M₀) :=
mt isUnit_zero_iff.1 zero_ne_one
namespace Ring
open Classical in
/-- Introduce a function `inverse` on a monoid with zero `M₀`, which sends `x` to `x⁻¹` if `x` is
invertible and to `0` otherwise. This definition is somewhat ad hoc, but one needs a fully (rather
than partially) defined inverse function for some purposes, including for calculus.
Note that while this is in the `Ring` namespace for brevity, it requires the weaker assumption
`MonoidWithZero M₀` instead of `Ring M₀`. -/
noncomputable def inverse : M₀ → M₀ := fun x => if h : IsUnit x then ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) else 0
/-- By definition, if `x` is invertible then `inverse x = x⁻¹`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_unit (u : M₀ˣ) : inverse (u : M₀) = (u⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) := by
rw [inverse, dif_pos u.isUnit, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
theorem inverse_of_isUnit {x : M₀} (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x = ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) := dif_pos h
/-- By definition, if `x` is not invertible then `inverse x = 0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_non_unit (x : M₀) (h : ¬IsUnit x) : inverse x = 0 :=
dif_neg h
theorem mul_inverse_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * inverse x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.mul_inv]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.inv_mul]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * x * inverse x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * inverse x * x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * (inverse x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * (x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, one_mul]
theorem inverse_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * y = z ↔ y = x * z :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_left _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_left _ _ h]⟩
theorem eq_mul_inverse_iff_mul_eq (x y z : M₀) (h : IsUnit z) : x = y * inverse z ↔ x * z = y :=
⟨fun h1 => by rw [h1, inverse_mul_cancel_right _ _ h],
fun h1 => by rw [← h1, mul_inverse_cancel_right _ _ h]⟩
variable (M₀)
@[simp]
theorem inverse_one : inverse (1 : M₀) = 1 :=
inverse_unit 1
@[simp]
theorem inverse_zero : inverse (0 : M₀) = 0 := by
nontriviality
exact inverse_non_unit _ not_isUnit_zero
variable {M₀}
end Ring
theorem IsUnit.ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit a → IsUnit (Ring.inverse a)
| ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ ⟨u⁻¹, (Ring.inverse_unit u).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias IsUnit.ring_inverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] protected alias Ring.IsUnit.ringInverse := IsUnit.ringInverse
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_ringInverse {a : M₀} : IsUnit (Ring.inverse a) ↔ IsUnit a :=
⟨fun h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial M₀
· convert h
· contrapose h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h]
exact not_isUnit_zero
,
IsUnit.ringInverse⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias isUnit_ring_inverse := isUnit_ringInverse
namespace Units
variable [GroupWithZero G₀]
/-- Embed a non-zero element of a `GroupWithZero` into the unit group.
By combining this function with the operations on units,
or the `/ₚ` operation, it is possible to write a division
as a partial function with three arguments. -/
def mk0 (a : G₀) (ha : a ≠ 0) : G₀ˣ :=
⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk0_one (h := one_ne_zero) : mk0 (1 : G₀) h = 1 := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_mk0 {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : (mk0 a h : G₀) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk0_val (u : G₀ˣ) (h : (u : G₀) ≠ 0) : mk0 (u : G₀) h = u :=
Units.ext rfl
theorem mul_inv' (u : G₀ˣ) : u * (u : G₀)⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_inv_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
theorem inv_mul' (u : G₀ˣ) : (u⁻¹ : G₀) * u = 1 :=
inv_mul_cancel₀ u.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk0_inj {a b : G₀} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : Units.mk0 a ha = Units.mk0 b hb ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h => Units.ext h⟩
/-- In a group with zero, an existential over a unit can be rewritten in terms of `Units.mk0`. -/
theorem exists0 {p : G₀ˣ → Prop} : (∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g) ↔ ∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p (Units.mk0 g hg) :=
⟨fun ⟨g, pg⟩ => ⟨g, g.ne_zero, (g.mk0_val g.ne_zero).symm ▸ pg⟩,
fun ⟨g, hg, pg⟩ => ⟨Units.mk0 g hg, pg⟩⟩
/-- An alternative version of `Units.exists0`. This one is useful if Lean cannot
figure out `p` when using `Units.exists0` from right to left. -/
theorem exists0' {p : ∀ g : G₀, g ≠ 0 → Prop} :
(∃ (g : G₀) (hg : g ≠ 0), p g hg) ↔ ∃ g : G₀ˣ, p g g.ne_zero :=
Iff.trans (by simp_rw [val_mk0]) exists0.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_iff_ne_zero {p : G₀ → Prop} : (∃ u : G₀ˣ, p u) ↔ ∃ x ≠ 0, p x := by
simp [exists0]
theorem _root_.GroupWithZero.eq_zero_or_unit (a : G₀) : a = 0 ∨ ∃ u : G₀ˣ, a = u := by
simpa using em _
end Units
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b c : G₀} {m n : ℕ}
theorem IsUnit.mk0 (x : G₀) (hx : x ≠ 0) : IsUnit x :=
(Units.mk0 x hx).isUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff_ne_zero : IsUnit a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(Units.exists_iff_ne_zero (p := (· = a))).trans (by simp)
alias ⟨_, Ne.isUnit⟩ := isUnit_iff_ne_zero
-- Porting note: can't add this attribute?
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/740
-- attribute [protected] Ne.is_unit
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @fun a b h => by
contrapose! h
exact (Units.mk0 a h.1 * Units.mk0 b h.2).ne_zero }
-- Can't be put next to the other `mk0` lemmas because it depends on the
| -- `NoZeroDivisors` instance, which depends on `mk0`.
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Basic.lean | 236 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Floor
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Group
/-!
# Topological facts about `Int.floor`, `Int.ceil` and `Int.fract`
This file proves statements about limits and continuity of functions involving `floor`, `ceil` and
`fract`.
## Main declarations
* `tendsto_floor_atTop`, `tendsto_floor_atBot`, `tendsto_ceil_atTop`, `tendsto_ceil_atBot`:
`Int.floor` and `Int.ceil` tend to +-∞ in +-∞.
* `continuousOn_floor`: `Int.floor` is continuous on `Ico n (n + 1)`, because constant.
* `continuousOn_ceil`: `Int.ceil` is continuous on `Ioc n (n + 1)`, because constant.
* `continuousOn_fract`: `Int.fract` is continuous on `Ico n (n + 1)`.
* `ContinuousOn.comp_fract`: Precomposing a continuous function satisfying `f 0 = f 1` with
`Int.fract` yields another continuous function.
-/
open Filter Function Int Set Topology
namespace FloorSemiring
open scoped Nat
| variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [FloorSemiring K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 34 | 36 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
end AddZeroClass
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instNatSMul : SMul ℕ (α →₀ M) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (nsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
end AddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid M] : AddCommMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid
DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add (fun _ _ => rfl)
instance instNeg [NegZeroClass G] : Neg (α →₀ G) :=
⟨mapRange Neg.neg neg_zero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
theorem neg_apply [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (-g) a = -g a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_neg [NegZeroClass G] [NegZeroClass H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (v : α →₀ G) : mapRange f hf (-v) = -mapRange f hf v :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', neg_apply, mapRange_apply]
|
theorem mapRange_neg' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (-v) = -mapRange f (map_zero f) v :=
mapRange_neg (map_neg f) v
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 591 | 596 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Invertible.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
/-!
# Centers of magmas and semigroups
## Main definitions
* `Set.center`: the center of a magma
* `Set.addCenter`: the center of an additive magma
* `Set.centralizer`: the centralizer of a subset of a magma
* `Set.addCentralizer`: the centralizer of a subset of an additive magma
## See also
See `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Center` for the definition of the center as a subsemigroup:
* `Subsemigroup.center`: the center of a semigroup
* `AddSubsemigroup.center`: the center of an additive semigroup
We provide `Submonoid.center`, `AddSubmonoid.center`, `Subgroup.center`, `AddSubgroup.center`,
`Subsemiring.center`, and `Subring.center` in other files.
See `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Centralizer` for the definition of the centralizer
as a subsemigroup:
* `Subsemigroup.centralizer`: the centralizer of a subset of a semigroup
* `AddSubsemigroup.centralizer`: the centralizer of a subset of an additive semigroup
We provide `Monoid.centralizer`, `AddMonoid.centralizer`, `Subgroup.centralizer`, and
`AddSubgroup.centralizer` in other files.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso Finset MonoidWithZero Subsemigroup
variable {M : Type*} {S T : Set M}
/-- Conditions for an element to be additively central -/
structure IsAddCentral [Add M] (z : M) : Prop where
/-- addition commutes -/
comm (a : M) : z + a = a + z
/-- associative property for left addition -/
left_assoc (b c : M) : z + (b + c) = (z + b) + c
/-- middle associative addition property -/
mid_assoc (a c : M) : (a + z) + c = a + (z + c)
/-- associative property for right addition -/
right_assoc (a b : M) : (a + b) + z = a + (b + z)
/-- Conditions for an element to be multiplicatively central -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulCentral [Mul M] (z : M) : Prop where
/-- multiplication commutes -/
comm (a : M) : z * a = a * z
/-- associative property for left multiplication -/
left_assoc (b c : M) : z * (b * c) = (z * b) * c
/-- middle associative multiplication property -/
mid_assoc (a c : M) : (a * z) * c = a * (z * c)
/-- associative property for right multiplication -/
right_assoc (a b : M) : (a * b) * z = a * (b * z)
attribute [mk_iff] IsMulCentral IsAddCentral
attribute [to_additive existing] isMulCentral_iff
namespace IsMulCentral
variable {a c : M} [Mul M]
-- cf. `Commute.left_comm`
@[to_additive]
protected theorem left_comm (h : IsMulCentral a) (b c) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
simp only [h.comm, h.right_assoc]
-- cf. `Commute.right_comm`
@[to_additive]
protected theorem right_comm (h : IsMulCentral c) (a b) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
simp only [h.right_assoc, h.mid_assoc, h.comm]
end IsMulCentral
namespace Set
/-! ### Center -/
section Mul
variable [Mul M]
variable (M) in
/-- The center of a magma. -/
@[to_additive addCenter " The center of an additive magma. "]
def center : Set M :=
{ z | IsMulCentral z }
variable (S) in
/-- The centralizer of a subset of a magma. -/
@[to_additive addCentralizer " The centralizer of a subset of an additive magma. "]
def centralizer : Set M := {c | ∀ m ∈ S, m * c = c * m}
@[to_additive mem_addCenter_iff]
theorem mem_center_iff {z : M} : z ∈ center M ↔ IsMulCentral z :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive mem_addCentralizer]
lemma mem_centralizer_iff {c : M} : c ∈ centralizer S ↔ ∀ m ∈ S, m * c = c * m := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_mem_addCenter]
theorem mul_mem_center {z₁ z₂ : M} (hz₁ : z₁ ∈ Set.center M) (hz₂ : z₂ ∈ Set.center M) :
z₁ * z₂ ∈ Set.center M where
comm a := calc
z₁ * z₂ * a = z₂ * z₁ * a := by rw [hz₁.comm]
_ = z₂ * (z₁ * a) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc z₂]
_ = (a * z₁) * z₂ := by rw [hz₁.comm, hz₂.comm]
_ = a * (z₁ * z₂) := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc a z₁]
left_assoc (b c : M) := calc
z₁ * z₂ * (b * c) = z₁ * (z₂ * (b * c)) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
_ = z₁ * ((z₂ * b) * c) := by rw [hz₂.left_assoc]
_ = (z₁ * (z₂ * b)) * c := by rw [hz₁.left_assoc]
_ = z₁ * z₂ * b * c := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
mid_assoc (a c : M) := calc
a * (z₁ * z₂) * c = ((a * z₁) * z₂) * c := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
_ = (a * z₁) * (z₂ * c) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
_ = a * (z₁ * (z₂ * c)) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
_ = a * (z₁ * z₂ * c) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
right_assoc (a b : M) := calc
a * b * (z₁ * z₂) = ((a * b) * z₁) * z₂ := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc]
_ = (a * (b * z₁)) * z₂ := by rw [hz₁.right_assoc]
_ = a * ((b * z₁) * z₂) := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc]
_ = a * (b * (z₁ * z₂)) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
@[to_additive addCenter_subset_addCentralizer]
lemma center_subset_centralizer (S : Set M) : Set.center M ⊆ S.centralizer :=
fun _ hx m _ ↦ (hx.comm m).symm
@[to_additive addCentralizer_union]
lemma centralizer_union : centralizer (S ∪ T) = centralizer S ∩ centralizer T := by
simp [centralizer, or_imp, forall_and, setOf_and]
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) addCentralizer_subset]
lemma centralizer_subset (h : S ⊆ T) : centralizer T ⊆ centralizer S := fun _ ht s hs ↦ ht s (h hs)
@[to_additive subset_addCentralizer_addCentralizer]
lemma subset_centralizer_centralizer : S ⊆ S.centralizer.centralizer := by
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_centralizer_iff]
exact fun y hy => (hy x hx).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) addCentralizer_addCentralizer_addCentralizer]
lemma centralizer_centralizer_centralizer (S : Set M) :
S.centralizer.centralizer.centralizer = S.centralizer := by
refine Set.Subset.antisymm ?_ Set.subset_centralizer_centralizer
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_centralizer_iff]
intro y hy
rw [Set.mem_centralizer_iff] at hx
exact hx y <| Set.subset_centralizer_centralizer hy
@[to_additive decidableMemAddCentralizer]
instance decidableMemCentralizer [∀ a : M, Decidable <| ∀ b ∈ S, b * a = a * b] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ centralizer S) := fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff' _ mem_centralizer_iff
@[to_additive addCentralizer_addCentralizer_comm_of_comm]
lemma centralizer_centralizer_comm_of_comm (h_comm : ∀ x ∈ S, ∀ y ∈ S, x * y = y * x) :
∀ x ∈ S.centralizer.centralizer, ∀ y ∈ S.centralizer.centralizer, x * y = y * x :=
fun _ h₁ _ h₂ ↦ h₂ _ fun _ h₃ ↦ h₁ _ fun _ h₄ ↦ h_comm _ h₄ _ h₃
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Semigroup.mem_center_iff {z : M} :
z ∈ Set.center M ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := ⟨fun a g ↦ by rw [IsMulCentral.comm a g],
| fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ (Commute.eq (h _)).symm, fun _ _ ↦ (mul_assoc z _ _).symm,
fun _ _ ↦ mul_assoc _ z _, fun _ _ ↦ mul_assoc _ _ z⟩ ⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_mem_addCentralizer]
lemma mul_mem_centralizer (ha : a ∈ centralizer S) (hb : b ∈ centralizer S) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Center.lean | 178 | 182 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
|
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,232 | 1,233 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 790 | 791 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ModuleCat
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
/-!
# The low-degree cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation
Let `k` be a commutative ring and `G` a group. This file gives simple expressions for
the group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A` in degrees 0, 1 and 2.
In `RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, we define the `n`th group cohomology of `A` to be
the cohomology of a complex `inhomogeneousCochains A`, whose objects are `(Fin n → G) → A`; this is
unnecessarily unwieldy in low degree. Moreover, cohomology of a complex is defined as an abstract
cokernel, whereas the definitions here are explicit quotients of cocycles by coboundaries.
We also show that when the representation on `A` is trivial, `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)`.
Given an additive or multiplicative abelian group `A` with an appropriate scalar action of `G`,
we provide support for turning a function `f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle identity into an
element of the `oneCocycles` of the representation on `A` (or `Additive A`) corresponding to the
scalar action. We also do this for 1-coboundaries, 2-cocycles and 2-coboundaries. The
multiplicative case, starting with the section `IsMulCocycle`, just mirrors the additive case;
unfortunately `@[to_additive]` can't deal with scalar actions.
The file also contains an identification between the definitions in
`RepresentationTheory.GroupCohomology.Basic`, `groupCohomology.cocycles A n` and
`groupCohomology A n`, and the `nCocycles` and `Hn A` in this file, for `n = 0, 1, 2`.
## Main definitions
* `groupCohomology.H0 A`: the invariants `Aᴳ` of the `G`-representation on `A`.
* `groupCohomology.H1 A`: 1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo
1-coboundaries (i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H2 A`: 2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo
2-coboundaries (i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`).
* `groupCohomology.H1LequivOfIsTrivial`: the isomorphism `H¹(G, A) ≃ Hom(G, A)` when the
representation on `A` is trivial.
* `groupCohomology.isoHn` for `n = 0, 1, 2`: an isomorphism
`groupCohomology A n ≅ groupCohomology.Hn A`.
## TODO
* The relationship between `H2` and group extensions
* The inflation-restriction exact sequence
* Nonabelian group cohomology
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Representation
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] (A : Rep k G)
namespace groupCohomology
section Cochains
/-- The 0th object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `A` as a `k`-module. -/
def zeroCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 0 ≃ₗ[k] A :=
LinearEquiv.funUnique (Fin 0 → G) k A
/-- The 1st object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def oneCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 1 ≃ₗ[k] G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) G).symm
/-- The 2nd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G², A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def twoCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 2 ≃ₗ[k] G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G).symm
/-- The 3rd object in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G` is isomorphic
to `Fun(G³, A)` as a `k`-module. -/
def threeCochainsLequiv : (inhomogeneousCochains A).X 3 ≃ₗ[k] G × G × G → A :=
LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft k A <| ((Fin.consEquiv _).symm.trans
((Equiv.refl G).prodCongr (piFinTwoEquiv fun _ => G))).symm
end Cochains
section Differentials
/-- The 0th differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `A → Fun(G, A)`. It sends `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
@[simps]
def dZero : A →ₗ[k] G → A where
toFun m g := A.ρ g m - m
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by simp only [map_add, add_sub_add_comm]; rfl
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_sub]
theorem dZero_ker_eq_invariants : LinearMap.ker (dZero A) = invariants A.ρ := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, mem_invariants, ← @sub_eq_zero _ _ _ x, funext_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dZero_eq_zero [A.IsTrivial] : dZero A = 0 := by
ext
simp only [dZero_apply, isTrivial_apply, sub_self, LinearMap.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
lemma dZero_comp_subtype : dZero A ∘ₗ A.ρ.invariants.subtype = 0 := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩ g
replace hx := hx g
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
exact hx
/-- The 1st differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
@[simps]
def dOne : (G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G → A where
toFun f g := A.ρ g.1 (f g.2) - f (g.1 * g.2) + f g.1
map_add' x y := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_add, add_add_add_comm, add_sub_add_comm]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; rw [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- The 2nd differential in the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`, as a
`k`-linear map `Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)`. It sends
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
@[simps]
def dTwo : (G × G → A) →ₗ[k] G × G × G → A where
toFun f g :=
A.ρ g.1 (f (g.2.1, g.2.2)) - f (g.1 * g.2.1, g.2.2) + f (g.1, g.2.1 * g.2.2) - f (g.1, g.2.1)
map_add' x y :=
funext fun g => by
dsimp
rw [map_add, add_sub_add_comm (A.ρ _ _), add_sub_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, add_add_add_comm,
add_sub_assoc, add_sub_assoc]
map_smul' r x := funext fun g => by dsimp; simp only [map_smul, smul_add, smul_sub]
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dZero` gives a simpler expression for the 0th differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C⁰(G, A) ---d⁰---> C¹(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
A ---- dZero ---> Fun(G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `zeroCochainsLequiv` and `oneCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dZero_comp_eq : dZero A ∘ₗ (zeroCochainsLequiv A) =
oneCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y (x default) - x default = _ + ({0} : Finset _).sum _
simp_rw [Fin.val_eq_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul,
Finset.sum_singleton, sub_eq_add_neg]
rcongr i <;> exact Fin.elim0 i
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dOne` gives a simpler expression for the 1st differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C¹(G, A) ---d¹-----> C²(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G, A) -dOne-> Fun(G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `oneCochainsLequiv` and `twoCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dOne_comp_eq : dOne A ∘ₗ oneCochainsLequiv A =
twoCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 1 2).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ = _ + _
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two]
simp only [Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul, one_smul, Fin.val_one,
Nat.one_add, neg_one_sq, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
rcongr i <;> rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0] <;> rfl
/-- Let `C(G, A)` denote the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A : Rep k G`. This lemma
says `dTwo` gives a simpler expression for the 2nd differential: that is, the following
square commutes:
```
C²(G, A) -------d²-----> C³(G, A)
| |
| |
| |
v v
Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)
```
where the vertical arrows are `twoCochainsLequiv` and `threeCochainsLequiv` respectively.
-/
theorem dTwo_comp_eq :
dTwo A ∘ₗ twoCochainsLequiv A =
threeCochainsLequiv A ∘ₗ ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 2 3).hom := by
ext x y
show A.ρ y.1 (x _) - x _ + x _ - x _ = _ + _
dsimp
rw [Fin.sum_univ_three]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, Fin.val_zero, zero_add, pow_one, neg_smul,
one_smul, Fin.val_one, Fin.val_two, pow_succ' (-1 : k) 2, neg_sq, Nat.one_add, one_pow, mul_one]
rcongr i <;> fin_cases i <;> rfl
theorem dOne_comp_dZero : dOne A ∘ₗ dZero A = 0 := by
ext x g
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dOne_apply A, dZero_apply A, map_sub,
map_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_self]
rfl
theorem dTwo_comp_dOne : dTwo A ∘ₗ dOne A = 0 := by
show (ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne A) ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo A)).hom = _
have h1 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dOne_comp_eq A)
have h2 := congr_arg ModuleCat.ofHom (dTwo_comp_eq A)
simp only [ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ModuleCat.ofHom_comp, ← LinearEquiv.toModuleIso_hom] at h1 h2
simp only [(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h2, (Iso.eq_inv_comp _).2 h1, ModuleCat.ofHom_hom,
ModuleCat.hom_ofHom, Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc,
zero_comp, comp_zero, ModuleCat.hom_zero]
open ShortComplex
/-- The (exact) short complex `A.ρ.invariants ⟶ A ⟶ (G → A)`. -/
def shortComplexH0 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk _ _ (dZero_comp_subtype A)
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH1 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dZero A) (dOne A) (dOne_comp_dZero A)
/-- The short complex `Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A) --dTwo--> Fun(G × G × G, A)`. -/
def shortComplexH2 : ShortComplex (ModuleCat k) :=
moduleCatMk (dOne A) (dTwo A) (dTwo_comp_dOne A)
end Differentials
section Cocycles
/-- The 1-cocycles `Z¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def oneCocycles : Submodule k (G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dOne A)
/-- The 2-cocycles `Z²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the kernel of the map
`Fun(G × G, A) → Fun(G × G × G, A)` sending
`(f, (g₁, g₂, g₃)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂, g₃)) - f(g₁g₂, g₃) + f(g₁, g₂g₃) - f(g₁, g₂).` -/
def twoCocycles : Submodule k (G × G → A) := LinearMap.ker (dTwo A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCocycles A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCocycles A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : oneCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCocycles A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
theorem mem_oneCocycles_def (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, A.ρ g (f h) - f (g * h) + f g = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dOne_apply, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_iff (f : G → A) :
f ∈ oneCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = A.ρ g (f h) + f g := by
simp_rw [mem_oneCocycles_def, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_one (f : oneCocycles A) : f 1 = 0 := by
have := (mem_oneCocycles_def f).1 f.2 1 1
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, mul_one, sub_self, zero_add] using this
@[simp] theorem oneCocycles_map_inv (f : oneCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f g⁻¹) = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← oneCocycles_map_one f, ← mul_inv_cancel g,
(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹]
theorem dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles (x : A) :
dZero A x ∈ oneCocycles A :=
congr($(dOne_comp_dZero A) x)
theorem oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial [A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (g h : G) :
f (g * h) = f g + f h := by
rw [(mem_oneCocycles_iff f).1 f.2, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f h), add_comm]
theorem mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
f ∘ Additive.ofMul ∈ oneCocycles A :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff _).2 fun g h => by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ofMul_mul, map_add,
oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial, isTrivial_apply A.ρ g (f (Additive.ofMul h)),
add_comm (f (Additive.ofMul g))]
variable (A) in
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `Z¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
@[simps] def oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial [hA : A.IsTrivial] :
oneCocycles A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ Additive.toMul
map_zero' := oneCocycles_map_one f
map_add' := oneCocycles_map_mul_of_isTrivial f }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f :=
{ val := f
property := mem_oneCocycles_of_addMonoidHom f }
left_inv f := by ext; rfl
right_inv f := by ext; rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCocycles A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCocycles A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCocycles.val_eq_coe (f : twoCocycles A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCocycles_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCocycles A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
theorem mem_twoCocycles_def (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) - f (g * h, j) + f (g, h * j) - f (g, h) = 0 :=
LinearMap.mem_ker.trans <| by
rw [funext_iff]
simp only [dTwo_apply, Prod.mk.eta, Pi.zero_apply, Prod.forall]
theorem mem_twoCocycles_iff (f : G × G → A) :
f ∈ twoCocycles A ↔ ∀ g h j : G,
f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) =
A.ρ g (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j) := by
simp_rw [mem_twoCocycles_def, sub_eq_zero, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_comm,
add_comm (f (_ * _, _))]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_fst (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
have := ((mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 1 1 g).symm
simpa only [map_one, Module.End.one_apply, one_mul, add_right_inj, this]
theorem twoCocycles_map_one_snd (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = A.ρ g (f (1, 1)) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g 1 1
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj, this]
lemma twoCocycles_ρ_map_inv_sub_map_inv (f : twoCocycles A) (g : G) :
A.ρ g (f (g⁻¹, g)) - f (g, g⁻¹)
= f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := (mem_twoCocycles_iff f).1 f.2 g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, twoCocycles_map_one_fst _ g]
at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
theorem dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles (x : G → A) :
dOne A x ∈ twoCocycles A :=
congr($(dTwo_comp_dOne A) x)
end Cocycles
section Coboundaries
/-- The 1-coboundaries `B¹(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`A → Fun(G, A)` sending `(a, g) ↦ ρ_A(g)(a) - a.` -/
def oneCoboundaries : Submodule k (G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dZero A)
/-- The 2-coboundaries `B²(G, A)` of `A : Rep k G`, defined as the image of the map
`Fun(G, A) → Fun(G × G, A)` sending `(f, (g₁, g₂)) ↦ ρ_A(g₁)(f(g₂)) - f(g₁g₂) + f(g₁).` -/
def twoCoboundaries : Submodule k (G × G → A) :=
LinearMap.range (dOne A)
variable {A}
instance : FunLike (oneCoboundaries A) G A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : oneCoboundaries A) : G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem oneCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : oneCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem oneCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : oneCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g : G, f₁ g = f₂ g) : f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ h
variable (A) in
lemma oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A ≤ oneCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dZero_apply_mem_oneCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B¹(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z¹(G, A)`. -/
abbrev oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles : oneCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] oneCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (oneCoboundaries_le_oneCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles_apply (x : oneCoboundaries A) :
oneCoboundariesToOneCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
theorem oneCoboundaries_eq_bot_of_isTrivial (A : Rep k G) [A.IsTrivial] :
oneCoboundaries A = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [oneCoboundaries, dZero_eq_zero]
exact LinearMap.range_eq_bot.2 rfl
instance : FunLike (twoCoboundaries A) (G × G) A := ⟨Subtype.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.coe_mk (f : G × G → A) (hf) :
((⟨f, hf⟩ : twoCoboundaries A) : G × G → A) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem twoCoboundaries.val_eq_coe (f : twoCoboundaries A) : f.1 = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem twoCoboundaries_ext {f₁ f₂ : twoCoboundaries A} (h : ∀ g h : G, f₁ (g, h) = f₂ (g, h)) :
f₁ = f₂ :=
DFunLike.ext f₁ f₂ (Prod.forall.mpr h)
variable (A) in
lemma twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A ≤ twoCocycles A := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact dOne_apply_mem_twoCocycles x
variable (A) in
/-- Natural inclusion `B²(G, A) →ₗ[k] Z²(G, A)`. -/
abbrev twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles : twoCoboundaries A →ₗ[k] twoCocycles A :=
Submodule.inclusion (twoCoboundaries_le_twoCocycles A)
@[simp]
lemma twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles_apply (x : twoCoboundaries A) :
twoCoboundariesToTwoCocycles A x = x.1 := rfl
end Coboundaries
section IsCocycle
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) + f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsOneCocycle (f : G → A) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h + f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) + f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) + f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCocycle (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) + f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) + f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Monoid G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
theorem map_one_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_add] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, add_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, add_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [MulAction G A]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = - f g := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← map_one_of_isOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_sub_map_inv_of_isTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) - f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) - f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add.2 this.symm
end
end IsCocycle
section IsCoboundary
variable {G A : Type*} [Mul G] [AddCommGroup A] [SMul G A]
/-- A function `f : G → A` satisfies the 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : A` such that
`g • x - x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsOneCoboundary (f : G → A) : Prop := ∃ x : A, ∀ g : G, g • x - x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → A` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → A` such
that `g • x(h) - x(gh) + x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → A) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → A, ∀ g h : G, g • x h - x (g * h) + x g = f (g, h)
end IsCoboundary
section ofDistribMulAction
variable {k G A : Type u} [CommRing k] [Group G] [AddCommGroup A] [Module k A]
[DistribMulAction G A] [SMulCommClass G k A]
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsOneCocycle {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCocycle f :=
fun _ _ => (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf _ _
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → A` satisfying the 1-coboundary condition, produces a 1-coboundary for the representation
on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsOneCoboundary {f : G → A} (hf : IsOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → A) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsOneCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the representation on
`A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsTwoCocycle {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCocycle f := (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) f).1 hf
/-- Given a `k`-module `A` with a compatible `DistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → A` satisfying the 2-coboundary condition, produces a 2-coboundary for the
representation on `A` induced by the `DistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCoboundariesOfIsTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → A} (hf : IsTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A) :=
⟨f, hf.choose,funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → A) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofDistribMulAction k G A)) :
IsTwoCoboundary f := by
rcases hf with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
end ofDistribMulAction
/-! The next few sections, until the section `Cohomology`, are a multiplicative copy of the
previous few sections beginning with `IsCocycle`. Unfortunately `@[to_additive]` doesn't work with
scalar actions. -/
section IsMulCocycle
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition if
`f(gh) = g • f(h) * f(g)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCocycle (f : G → M) : Prop := ∀ g h : G, f (g * h) = g • f h * f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition if
`f(gh, j) * f(g, h) = g • f(h, j) * f(g, hj)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCocycle (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∀ g h j : G, f (g * h, j) * f (g, h) = g • (f (h, j)) * f (g, h * j)
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Monoid G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
theorem map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
f 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one, one_smul, left_eq_mul] using hf 1 1
theorem map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (1, g) = f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_one, mul_right_inj] using (hf 1 1 g).symm
theorem map_one_snd_of_isMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
f (g, 1) = g • f (1, 1) := by
simpa only [mul_one, mul_left_inj] using hf g 1 1
end
section
variable {G M : Type*} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulAction G M]
@[scoped simp] theorem map_inv_of_isMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f g⁻¹ = (f g)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, ← map_one_of_isMulOneCocycle hf, ← mul_inv_cancel g, hf g g⁻¹]
theorem smul_map_inv_div_map_inv_of_isMulTwoCocycle
{f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) (g : G) :
g • f (g⁻¹, g) / f (g, g⁻¹) = f (1, 1) / f (g, 1) := by
have := hf g g⁻¹ g
simp only [mul_inv_cancel, inv_mul_cancel, map_one_fst_of_isMulTwoCocycle hf g] at this
exact div_eq_div_iff_mul_eq_mul.2 this.symm
end
end IsMulCocycle
section IsMulCoboundary
variable {G M : Type*} [Mul G] [CommGroup M] [SMul G M]
/-- A function `f : G → M` satisfies the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition if there's `x : M`
such that `g • x / x = f(g)` for all `g : G`. -/
def IsMulOneCoboundary (f : G → M) : Prop := ∃ x : M, ∀ g : G, g • x / x = f g
/-- A function `f : G × G → M` satisfies the 2-coboundary condition if there's `x : G → M` such
that `g • x(h) / x(gh) * x(g) = f(g, h)` for all `g, h : G`. -/
def IsMulTwoCoboundary (f : G × G → M) : Prop :=
∃ x : G → M, ∀ g h : G, g • x h / x (g * h) * x g = f (g, h)
end IsMulCoboundary
section ofMulDistribMulAction
variable {G M : Type} [Group G] [CommGroup M] [MulDistribMulAction G M]
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-cocycle condition, produces a 1-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCocyclesOfIsMulOneCocycle {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCocycle f) :
oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulOneCocycle_of_mem_oneCocycles
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_oneCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 1-coboundary condition, produces a
1-coboundary for the representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def oneCoboundariesOfIsMulOneCoboundary {f : G → M} (hf : IsMulOneCoboundary f) :
oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext hf.choose_spec⟩
theorem isMulOneCoboundary_of_mem_oneCoboundaries
(f : G → M) (hf : f ∈ oneCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulOneCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.ofMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-cocycle condition, produces a 2-cocycle for the
representation on `Additive M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
@[simps]
def twoCocyclesOfIsMulTwoCocycle {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCocycle f) :
twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨Additive.ofMul ∘ f, (mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).2 hf⟩
theorem isMulTwoCocycle_of_mem_twoCocycles
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCocycles (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCocycle (Additive.toMul ∘ f) :=
(mem_twoCocycles_iff (A := Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) f).1 hf
/-- Given an abelian group `M` with a `MulDistribMulAction` of `G`, and a function
`f : G × G → M` satisfying the multiplicative 2-coboundary condition, produces a
2-coboundary for the representation on `M` induced by the `MulDistribMulAction`. -/
def twoCoboundariesOfIsMulTwoCoboundary {f : G × G → M} (hf : IsMulTwoCoboundary f) :
twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M) :=
⟨f, hf.choose, funext fun g ↦ hf.choose_spec g.1 g.2⟩
theorem isMulTwoCoboundary_of_mem_twoCoboundaries
(f : G × G → M) (hf : f ∈ twoCoboundaries (Rep.ofMulDistribMulAction G M)) :
IsMulTwoCoboundary (M := M) (Additive.toMul ∘ f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
end ofMulDistribMulAction
section Cohomology
/-- We define the 0th group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H⁰(G, A)`, to be
the invariants of the representation, `Aᴳ`. -/
abbrev H0 := ModuleCat.of k A.ρ.invariants
/-- We define the 1st group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H¹(G, A)`, to be
1-cocycles (i.e. `Z¹(G, A) := Ker(d¹ : Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A)`) modulo 1-coboundaries
(i.e. `B¹(G, A) := Im(d⁰: A → Fun(G, A))`). -/
abbrev H1 := (shortComplexH1 A).moduleCatHomology
/-- The quotient map `Z¹(G, A) → H¹(G, A).` -/
abbrev H1π : ModuleCat.of k (oneCocycles A) ⟶ H1 A := (shortComplexH1 A).moduleCatHomologyπ
variable {A} in
lemma H1π_eq_zero_iff (x : oneCocycles A) : H1π A x = 0 ↔ ⇑x ∈ oneCoboundaries A := by
show (LinearMap.range ((dZero A).codRestrict (oneCocycles A) _)).mkQ _ = 0 ↔ _
simp [LinearMap.range_codRestrict, oneCoboundaries]
/-- We define the 2nd group cohomology of a `k`-linear `G`-representation `A`, `H²(G, A)`, to be
2-cocycles (i.e. `Z²(G, A) := Ker(d² : Fun(G², A) → Fun(G³, A)`) modulo 2-coboundaries
(i.e. `B²(G, A) := Im(d¹: Fun(G, A) → Fun(G², A))`). -/
abbrev H2 := (shortComplexH2 A).moduleCatHomology
/-- The quotient map `Z²(G, A) → H²(G, A).` -/
abbrev H2π : ModuleCat.of k (twoCocycles A) ⟶ H2 A := (shortComplexH2 A).moduleCatHomologyπ
variable {A} in
lemma H2π_eq_zero_iff (x : twoCocycles A) : H2π A x = 0 ↔ ⇑x ∈ twoCoboundaries A := by
show (LinearMap.range ((dOne A).codRestrict (twoCocycles A) _)).mkQ _ = 0 ↔ _
simp [LinearMap.range_codRestrict, twoCoboundaries]
end Cohomology
section H0
/-- When the representation on `A` is trivial, then `H⁰(G, A)` is all of `A.` -/
def H0LequivOfIsTrivial [A.IsTrivial] :
H0 A ≃ₗ[k] A := LinearEquiv.ofTop _ (invariants_eq_top A.ρ)
@[simp] theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_eq_subtype [A.IsTrivial] :
H0LequivOfIsTrivial A = A.ρ.invariants.subtype := rfl
theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_apply [A.IsTrivial] (x : H0 A) :
H0LequivOfIsTrivial A x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem H0LequivOfIsTrivial_symm_apply [A.IsTrivial] (x : A) :
(H0LequivOfIsTrivial A).symm x = x := rfl
end H0
section H1
/-- When `A : Rep k G` is a trivial representation of `G`, `H¹(G, A)` is isomorphic to the
group homs `G → A`. -/
def H1LequivOfIsTrivial [A.IsTrivial] :
H1 A ≃ₗ[k] Additive G →+ A :=
(Submodule.quotEquivOfEqBot _
(by simp [shortComplexH1, ShortComplex.moduleCatToCycles, Submodule.eq_bot_iff])).trans
(oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial A)
theorem H1LequivOfIsTrivial_comp_H1π [A.IsTrivial] :
(H1LequivOfIsTrivial A).comp (H1π A).hom = oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial A := by
ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem H1LequivOfIsTrivial_H1_π_apply_apply
[A.IsTrivial] (f : oneCocycles A) (x : Additive G) :
H1LequivOfIsTrivial A (Submodule.Quotient.mk f) x = f x.toMul := rfl
@[simp] theorem H1LequivOfIsTrivial_symm_apply [A.IsTrivial] (f : Additive G →+ A) :
(H1LequivOfIsTrivial A).symm f = H1π A ((oneCocyclesLequivOfIsTrivial A).symm f) :=
rfl
end H1
section groupCohomologyIso
open ShortComplex
section H0
instance : Mono (shortComplexH0 A).f := by
rw [ModuleCat.mono_iff_injective]
apply Submodule.injective_subtype
lemma shortComplexH0_exact : (shortComplexH0 A).Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.moduleCat_exact_iff]
intro (x : A) (hx : dZero _ x = 0)
refine ⟨⟨x, fun g => ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
exact congr_fun hx g
/-- The arrow `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A)` is isomorphic to the differential
`(inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1` of the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A`. -/
@[simps! hom_left hom_right inv_left inv_right]
def dZeroArrowIso : Arrow.mk ((inhomogeneousCochains A).d 0 1) ≅
Arrow.mk (ModuleCat.ofHom (dZero A)) :=
Arrow.isoMk (zeroCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso
(oneCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso (ModuleCat.hom_ext (dZero_comp_eq A))
/-- The 0-cocycles of the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A` are isomorphic to
`A.ρ.invariants`, which is a simpler type. -/
def isoZeroCocycles : cocycles A 0 ≅ H0 A :=
KernelFork.mapIsoOfIsLimit
((inhomogeneousCochains A).cyclesIsKernel 0 1 (by simp)) (shortComplexH0_exact A).fIsKernel
(dZeroArrowIso A)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
lemma isoZeroCocycles_hom_comp_subtype :
(isoZeroCocycles A).hom ≫ ModuleCat.ofHom A.ρ.invariants.subtype =
iCocycles A 0 ≫ (zeroCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso.hom := by
dsimp [isoZeroCocycles]
apply KernelFork.mapOfIsLimit_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
lemma isoZeroCocycles_inv_comp_iCocycles :
(isoZeroCocycles A).inv ≫ iCocycles A 0 =
ModuleCat.ofHom A.ρ.invariants.subtype ≫ (zeroCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso.inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, isoZeroCocycles_hom_comp_subtype]
/-- The 0th group cohomology of `A`, defined as the 0th cohomology of the complex of inhomogeneous
cochains, is isomorphic to the invariants of the representation on `A`. -/
def isoH0 : groupCohomology A 0 ≅ H0 A :=
(CochainComplex.isoHomologyπ₀ _).symm ≪≫ isoZeroCocycles A
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
lemma groupCohomologyπ_comp_isoH0_hom :
groupCohomologyπ A 0 ≫ (isoH0 A).hom = (isoZeroCocycles A).hom := by
simp [isoH0]
end H0
section H1
/-- The short complex `A --dZero--> Fun(G, A) --dOne--> Fun(G × G, A)` is isomorphic to the 1st
short complex associated to the complex of inhomogeneous cochains of `A`. -/
@[simps! hom inv]
def shortComplexH1Iso : (inhomogeneousCochains A).sc' 0 1 2 ≅ shortComplexH1 A :=
isoMk (zeroCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso (oneCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso
| (twoCochainsLequiv A).toModuleIso
(ModuleCat.hom_ext (dZero_comp_eq A))
(ModuleCat.hom_ext (dOne_comp_eq A))
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/LowDegree.lean | 836 | 839 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [eLpNorm_const c h0 hμ]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc.lt_top (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp)
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ))
theorem memLp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ :=
| memLp_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const := memLp_const
theorem memLp_top_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) ∞ μ :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 285 | 291 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Tactic.OfNat
/-!
# Cast of natural numbers
This file defines the *canonical* homomorphism from the natural numbers into an
`AddMonoid` with a one. In additive monoids with one, there exists a unique
such homomorphism and we store it in the `natCast : ℕ → R` field.
Preferentially, the homomorphism is written as the coercion `Nat.cast`.
## Main declarations
* `NatCast`: Type class for `Nat.cast`.
* `AddMonoidWithOne`: Type class for which `Nat.cast` is a canonical monoid homomorphism from `ℕ`.
* `Nat.cast`: Canonical homomorphism `ℕ → R`.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- The numeral `((0+1)+⋯)+1`. -/
protected def Nat.unaryCast [One R] [Zero R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => Nat.unaryCast n + 1
-- the following four declarations are not in mathlib3 and are relevant to the way numeric
-- literals are handled in Lean 4.
/-- A type class for natural numbers which are greater than or equal to `2`. -/
class Nat.AtLeastTwo (n : ℕ) : Prop where
prop : n ≥ 2
instance instNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} : Nat.AtLeastTwo (n + 2) where
prop := Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le _
namespace Nat.AtLeastTwo
variable {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]
lemma one_lt : 1 < n := prop
lemma ne_one : n ≠ 1 := Nat.ne_of_gt one_lt
end Nat.AtLeastTwo
/-- Recognize numeric literals which are at least `2` as terms of `R` via `Nat.cast`. This
instance is what makes things like `37 : R` type check. Note that `0` and `1` are not needed
because they are recognized as terms of `R` (at least when `R` is an `AddMonoidWithOne`) through
`Zero` and `One`, respectively. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
instance (priority := 100) instOfNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
OfNat R n where
ofNat := n.cast
library_note "no_index around OfNat.ofNat"
/--
When writing lemmas about `OfNat.ofNat` that assume `Nat.AtLeastTwo`, the term needs to be wrapped
in `no_index` so as not to confuse `simp`, as `no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Rather than referencing this library note, use `ofNat(n)` as a shorthand for
`no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Some discussion is [on Zulip here](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Polynomial.2Ecoeff.20example/near/395438147).
-/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem Nat.cast_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast ofNat(n) : R) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[deprecated Nat.cast_ofNat (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem Nat.cast_eq_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast n : R) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
/-! ### Additive monoids with one -/
/-- An `AddMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoid` with a `1`.
It also contains data for the unique homomorphism `ℕ → R`. -/
class AddMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends NatCast R, AddMonoid R, One R where
natCast := Nat.unaryCast
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` sends `0 : ℕ` to `0 : R`. -/
natCast_zero : natCast 0 = 0 := by intros; rfl
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` is a homomorphism. -/
natCast_succ : ∀ n, natCast (n + 1) = natCast n + 1 := by intros; rfl
/-- An `AddCommMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoidWithOne` satisfying `a + b = b + a`. -/
class AddCommMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends AddMonoidWithOne R, AddCommMonoid R
library_note "coercion into rings"
/--
Coercions such as `Nat.castCoe` that go from a concrete structure such as
`ℕ` to an arbitrary ring `R` should be set up as follows:
```lean
instance : CoeTail ℕ R where coe := ...
instance : CoeHTCT ℕ R where coe := ...
```
It needs to be `CoeTail` instead of `Coe` because otherwise type-class
inference would loop when constructing the transitive coercion `ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ...`.
Sometimes we also need to declare the `CoeHTCT` instance
if we need to shadow another coercion
(e.g. `Nat.cast` should be used over `Int.ofNat`).
-/
namespace Nat
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
-- Lemmas about `Nat.succ` need to get a low priority, so that they are tried last.
-- This is because `Nat.succ _` matches `1`, `3`, `x+1`, etc.
-- Rewriting would then produce really wrong terms.
@[norm_cast 500]
theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((succ n : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ _
theorem cast_add_one (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ite (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (m n : ℕ) :
((ite P m n : ℕ) : R) = ite P (m : R) (n : R) := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
end Nat
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] : ((1 : ℕ) : R) = 1 := by
rw [cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne R] (m n : ℕ) : ((m + n : ℕ) : R) = m + n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [add_succ, cast_succ, ih, cast_succ, add_assoc]
/-- Computationally friendlier cast than `Nat.unaryCast`, using binary representation. -/
protected def binCast [Zero R] [One R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => if (n + 1) % 2 = 0
then (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2))
else (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + 1
@[simp]
theorem binCast_eq [AddMonoidWithOne R] (n : ℕ) :
(Nat.binCast n : R) = ((n : ℕ) : R) := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind k hk => ?_
cases k with
| zero => rw [Nat.binCast, Nat.cast_zero]
| succ k =>
rw [Nat.binCast]
by_cases h : (k + 1) % 2 = 0
· conv => rhs; rw [← Nat.mod_add_div (k+1) 2]
rw [if_pos h, hk _ <| Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos k) (Nat.le_refl 2), ← Nat.cast_add]
rw [h, Nat.zero_add, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
· conv => rhs; rw [← Nat.mod_add_div (k+1) 2]
rw [if_neg h, hk _ <| Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos k) (Nat.le_refl 2), ← Nat.cast_add]
have h1 := Or.resolve_left (Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (succ k)) h
rw [h1, Nat.add_comm 1, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
theorem cast_two [NatCast R] : ((2 : ℕ) : R) = (2 : R) := rfl
theorem cast_three [NatCast R] : ((3 : ℕ) : R) = (3 : R) := rfl
theorem cast_four [NatCast R] : ((4 : ℕ) : R) = (4 : R) := rfl
attribute [simp, norm_cast] Int.natAbs_ofNat
end Nat
/-- `AddMonoidWithOne` implementation using unary recursion. -/
protected abbrev AddMonoidWithOne.unary [AddMonoid R] [One R] : AddMonoidWithOne R :=
{ ‹One R›, ‹AddMonoid R› with }
/-- `AddMonoidWithOne` implementation using binary recursion. -/
protected abbrev AddMonoidWithOne.binary [AddMonoid R] [One R] : AddMonoidWithOne R :=
{ ‹One R›, ‹AddMonoid R› with
natCast := Nat.binCast,
natCast_zero := by simp only [Nat.binCast, Nat.cast],
natCast_succ := fun n => by
letI : AddMonoidWithOne R := AddMonoidWithOne.unary
rw [Nat.binCast_eq, Nat.binCast_eq, Nat.cast_succ] }
theorem one_add_one_eq_two [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 1 + 1 = (2 : R) := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem two_add_one_eq_three [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 2 + 1 = (3 : R) := by
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem three_add_one_eq_four [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 3 + 1 = (4 : R) := by
rw [← two_add_one_eq_three, ← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one,
← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem two_add_two_eq_four [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 2 + 2 = (4 : R) := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one, ← three_add_one_eq_four,
← two_add_one_eq_three, add_assoc]
section nsmul
@[simp] lemma nsmul_one {A} [AddMonoidWithOne A] : ∀ n : ℕ, n • (1 : A) = n
| 0 => by simp [zero_nsmul]
| n + 1 => by simp [succ_nsmul, nsmul_one n]
end nsmul
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean | 231 | 234 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.CircleMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### Facts about `circleMap`
-/
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
theorem hasDerivAt_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (circleMap c R) (circleMap 0 R θ * I) θ := by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, ofRealCLM_apply, circleMap, ofReal_one, zero_add]
using (((ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt (x := θ)).mul_const I).cexp.const_mul (R : ℂ)).const_add c
theorem differentiable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (circleMap c R) := fun θ =>
(hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).differentiableAt
/-- The circleMap is real analytic. -/
theorem analyticOnNhd_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (circleMap c R) Set.univ := by
intro z hz
apply analyticAt_const.add
apply analyticAt_const.mul
rw [← Function.comp_def]
apply analyticAt_cexp.restrictScalars.comp ((ofRealCLM.analyticAt z).mul (by fun_prop))
/-- The circleMap is continuously differentiable. -/
theorem contDiff_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiff ℝ n (circleMap c R) :=
(analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).contDiff
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Continuous (circleMap c R) :=
(differentiable_circleMap c R).continuous
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem measurable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Measurable (circleMap c R) :=
(continuous_circleMap c R).measurable
@[simp]
theorem deriv_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : deriv (circleMap c R) θ = circleMap 0 R θ * I :=
(hasDerivAt_circleMap _ _ _).deriv
theorem deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ = 0 ↔ R = 0 := by simp [I_ne_zero]
| theorem deriv_circleMap_ne_zero {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ ≠ 0 :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 130 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.CircleMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### Facts about `circleMap`
-/
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
theorem hasDerivAt_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (circleMap c R) (circleMap 0 R θ * I) θ := by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, ofRealCLM_apply, circleMap, ofReal_one, zero_add]
using (((ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt (x := θ)).mul_const I).cexp.const_mul (R : ℂ)).const_add c
theorem differentiable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (circleMap c R) := fun θ =>
(hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).differentiableAt
/-- The circleMap is real analytic. -/
theorem analyticOnNhd_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (circleMap c R) Set.univ := by
intro z hz
apply analyticAt_const.add
apply analyticAt_const.mul
rw [← Function.comp_def]
apply analyticAt_cexp.restrictScalars.comp ((ofRealCLM.analyticAt z).mul (by fun_prop))
/-- The circleMap is continuously differentiable. -/
theorem contDiff_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiff ℝ n (circleMap c R) :=
(analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).contDiff
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Continuous (circleMap c R) :=
(differentiable_circleMap c R).continuous
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem measurable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Measurable (circleMap c R) :=
(continuous_circleMap c R).measurable
@[simp]
theorem deriv_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : deriv (circleMap c R) θ = circleMap 0 R θ * I :=
(hasDerivAt_circleMap _ _ _).deriv
theorem deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ = 0 ↔ R = 0 := by simp [I_ne_zero]
theorem deriv_circleMap_ne_zero {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ ≠ 0 :=
mt deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff.1 hR
theorem lipschitzWith_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : LipschitzWith (Real.nnabs R) (circleMap c R) :=
lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le (differentiable_circleMap _ _) fun θ =>
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by simp
theorem continuous_circleMap_inv {R : ℝ} {z w : ℂ} (hw : w ∈ ball z R) :
Continuous fun θ => (circleMap z R θ - w)⁻¹ := by
have : ∀ θ, circleMap z R θ - w ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [sub_ne_zero]
exact fun θ => circleMap_ne_mem_ball hw θ
-- Porting note: was `continuity`
exact Continuous.inv₀ (by fun_prop) this
theorem circleMap_preimage_codiscrete {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
map (circleMap c R) (codiscrete ℝ) ≤ codiscreteWithin (Metric.sphere c |R|) := by
intro s hs
apply (analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).preimage_mem_codiscreteWithin
· intro x hx
by_contra hCon
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := eventuallyConst_iff_exists_eventuallyEq.1 hCon
| have := ha.deriv.eq_of_nhds
simp [hR] at this
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 153 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.AEStabilizer
/-!
# Measure-theoretic results about the additive circle
The file is a place to collect measure-theoretic results about the additive circle.
## Main definitions:
* `AddCircle.closedBall_ae_eq_ball`: open and closed balls in the additive circle are almost
equal
* `AddCircle.isAddFundamentalDomain_of_ae_ball`: a ball is a fundamental domain for rational
angle rotation in the additive circle
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric
open scoped Finset MeasureTheory Pointwise Topology ENNReal
namespace AddCircle
variable {T : ℝ} [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
theorem closedBall_ae_eq_ball {x : AddCircle T} {ε : ℝ} : closedBall x ε =ᵐ[volume] ball x ε := by
rcases le_or_lt ε 0 with hε | hε
· rw [ball_eq_empty.mpr hε, ae_eq_empty, volume_closedBall,
min_eq_right (by linarith [hT.out] : 2 * ε ≤ T), ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos zero_le_two hε
· suffices volume (closedBall x ε) ≤ volume (ball x ε) from
(ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge ball_subset_closedBall this
measurableSet_ball.nullMeasurableSet (measure_ne_top _ _)).symm
have : Tendsto (fun δ => volume (closedBall x δ)) (𝓝[<] ε) (𝓝 <| volume (closedBall x ε)) := by
simp_rw [volume_closedBall]
refine ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal (Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds <| Tendsto.const_mul _ ?_)
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
refine le_of_tendsto this <| mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT hε) fun r hr ↦ ?_
exact measure_mono (closedBall_subset_ball hr.2)
/-- Let `G` be the subgroup of `AddCircle T` generated by a point `u` of finite order `n : ℕ`. Then
any set `I` that is almost equal to a ball of radius `T / 2n` is a fundamental domain for the action
of `G` on `AddCircle T` by left addition. -/
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_of_ae_ball (I : Set <| AddCircle T) (u x : AddCircle T)
(hu : IsOfFinAddOrder u) (hI : I =ᵐ[volume] ball x (T / (2 * addOrderOf u))) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.zmultiples u) I := by
set G := AddSubgroup.zmultiples u
set n := addOrderOf u
set B := ball x (T / (2 * n))
have hn : 1 ≤ (n : ℝ) := by norm_cast; linarith [hu.addOrderOf_pos]
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk_of_measure_univ_le ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· -- `NullMeasurableSet I volume`
exact measurableSet_ball.nullMeasurableSet.congr hI.symm
· -- `∀ (g : G), g ≠ 0 → AEDisjoint volume (g +ᵥ I) I`
rintro ⟨g, hg⟩ hg'
replace hg' : g ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero] using hg'
change AEDisjoint volume (g +ᵥ I) I
refine AEDisjoint.congr (Disjoint.aedisjoint ?_)
((quasiMeasurePreserving_add_left volume (-g)).vadd_ae_eq_of_ae_eq g hI) hI
have hBg : g +ᵥ B = ball (g + x) (T / (2 * n)) := by
rw [add_comm g x, ← singleton_add_ball _ x g, add_ball, thickening_singleton]
rw [hBg]
apply ball_disjoint_ball
rw [dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_right, div_mul_eq_div_div, ← add_div, ← add_div,
add_self_div_two, div_le_iff₀' (by positivity : 0 < (n : ℝ)), ← nsmul_eq_mul]
refine (le_add_order_smul_norm_of_isOfFinAddOrder (hu.of_mem_zmultiples hg) hg').trans
(nsmul_le_nsmul_left (norm_nonneg g) ?_)
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (addOrderOf_pos_iff.mpr hu) (addOrderOf_dvd_of_mem_zmultiples hg)
· -- `∀ (g : G), QuasiMeasurePreserving (VAdd.vadd g) volume volume`
exact fun g => quasiMeasurePreserving_add_left (G := AddCircle T) volume g
· -- `volume univ ≤ ∑' (g : G), volume (g +ᵥ I)`
replace hI := hI.trans closedBall_ae_eq_ball.symm
haveI : Fintype G := @Fintype.ofFinite _ hu.finite_zmultiples.to_subtype
have hG_card : #(Finset.univ : Finset G) = n := by
show _ = addOrderOf u
rw [← Nat.card_zmultiples, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]; rfl
simp_rw [measure_vadd]
rw [AddCircle.measure_univ, tsum_fintype, Finset.sum_const, measure_congr hI,
volume_closedBall, ← ENNReal.ofReal_nsmul, mul_div, mul_div_mul_comm,
div_self, one_mul, min_eq_right (div_le_self hT.out.le hn), hG_card,
nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div_cancel₀ T (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hn).ne.symm]
exact two_ne_zero
theorem volume_of_add_preimage_eq (s I : Set <| AddCircle T) (u x : AddCircle T)
(hu : IsOfFinAddOrder u) (hs : (u +ᵥ s : Set <| AddCircle T) =ᵐ[volume] s)
(hI : I =ᵐ[volume] ball x (T / (2 * addOrderOf u))) :
volume s = addOrderOf u • volume (s ∩ I) := by
| let G := AddSubgroup.zmultiples u
haveI : Fintype G := @Fintype.ofFinite _ hu.finite_zmultiples.to_subtype
have hsG : ∀ g : G, (g +ᵥ s : Set <| AddCircle T) =ᵐ[volume] s := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩; exact (vadd_ae_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples hs hy :)
rw [(isAddFundamentalDomain_of_ae_ball I u x hu hI).measure_eq_card_smul_of_vadd_ae_eq_self s hsG,
← Nat.card_zmultiples u]
end AddCircle
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/AddCircle.lean | 95 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODO
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop
-- The `CompleteLattice, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
-- TODO: this could be replaced with `local infixr:90 " ∘ " => Rel.comp`.
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β := { y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y }
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
theorem image_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.image r.image := fun _ _ h _ ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩ =>
⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
theorem image_mono : Monotone r.image :=
r.image_subset
|
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 156 | 158 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
/-!
# Definition of nilpotent elements
This file defines the notion of a nilpotent element and proves the immediate consequences.
For results that require further theory, see `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic`
and `Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas`.
## Main definitions
* `IsNilpotent`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left`
* `Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right`
* `nilpotencyClass`
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
variable {R S : Type*} {x y : R}
/-- An element is said to be nilpotent if some natural-number-power of it equals zero.
Note that we require only the bare minimum assumptions for the definition to make sense. Even
`MonoidWithZero` is too strong since nilpotency is important in the study of rings that are only
power-associative. -/
def IsNilpotent [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] (x : R) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 0
theorem IsNilpotent.mk [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] (x : R) (n : ℕ) (e : x ^ n = 0) : IsNilpotent x :=
⟨n, e⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_of_subsingleton [Zero R] [Pow R ℕ] [Subsingleton R] : IsNilpotent x :=
⟨0, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem IsNilpotent.zero [MonoidWithZero R] : IsNilpotent (0 : R) :=
⟨1, pow_one 0⟩
theorem not_isNilpotent_one [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] :
¬ IsNilpotent (1 : R) := fun ⟨_, H⟩ ↦ zero_ne_one (H.symm.trans (one_pow _))
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_succ (n : ℕ) {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S}
(hx : IsNilpotent x) : IsNilpotent (x ^ n.succ) := by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx
use N
rw [← pow_mul, Nat.succ_mul, pow_add, hN, mul_zero]
theorem IsNilpotent.of_pow [MonoidWithZero R] {x : R} {m : ℕ}
(h : IsNilpotent (x ^ m)) : IsNilpotent x := by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := h
use m * n
rw [← h, pow_mul x m n]
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_of_pos {n} {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S}
(hx : IsNilpotent x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsNilpotent (x ^ n) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ => exact IsNilpotent.pow_succ _ hx
@[simp]
lemma IsNilpotent.pow_iff_pos {n} {S : Type*} [MonoidWithZero S] {x : S} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
IsNilpotent (x ^ n) ↔ IsNilpotent x :=
⟨of_pow, (pow_of_pos · hn)⟩
theorem IsNilpotent.map [MonoidWithZero R] [MonoidWithZero S] {r : R} {F : Type*}
[FunLike F R S] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F R S] (hr : IsNilpotent r) (f : F) :
IsNilpotent (f r) := by
use hr.choose
rw [← map_pow, hr.choose_spec, map_zero]
lemma IsNilpotent.map_iff [MonoidWithZero R] [MonoidWithZero S] {r : R} {F : Type*}
[FunLike F R S] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F R S] {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
IsNilpotent (f r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ ↦ ⟨k, (map_eq_zero_iff f hf).mp <| by rwa [map_pow]⟩, fun h ↦ h.map f⟩
theorem IsUnit.isNilpotent_mul_unit_of_commute_iff [MonoidWithZero R] {r u : R}
| (hu : IsUnit u) (h_comm : Commute r u) :
IsNilpotent (r * u) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun n ↦ by rw [h_comm.mul_pow, (hu.pow n).mul_left_eq_zero]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nilpotent/Defs.lean | 88 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Partially defined linear maps
A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`.
We define a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderBot` instance on this, and define three operations:
* `mkSpanSingleton` defines a partial linear map defined on the span of a singleton.
* `sup` takes two partial linear maps `f`, `g` that agree on the intersection of their
domains, and returns the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that
extends both `f` and `g`.
* `sSup` takes a `DirectedOn (· ≤ ·)` set of partial linear maps, and returns the unique
partial linear map on the `sSup` of their domains that extends all these maps.
Moreover, we define
* `LinearPMap.graph` is the graph of the partial linear map viewed as a submodule of `E × F`.
Partially defined maps are currently used in `Mathlib` to prove Hahn-Banach theorem
and its variations. Namely, `LinearPMap.sSup` implies that every chain of `LinearPMap`s
is bounded above.
They are also the basis for the theory of unbounded operators.
-/
universe u v w
/-- A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`. -/
structure LinearPMap (R : Type u) [Ring R] (E : Type v) [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] (F : Type w)
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] where
domain : Submodule R E
toFun : domain →ₗ[R] F
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 E " →ₗ.[" R:25 "] " F:0 => LinearPMap R E F
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] {F : Type*}
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
namespace LinearPMap
open Submodule
@[coe]
def toFun' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f.domain → F := f.toFun
instance : CoeFun (E →ₗ.[R] F) fun f : E →ₗ.[R] F => f.domain → F :=
⟨toFun'⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f.toFun x = f x :=
rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.domain = g.domain)
(h' : ∀ ⦃x : E⦄ ⦃hf : x ∈ f.domain⦄ ⦃hg : x ∈ g.domain⦄, f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨f_dom, f⟩
rcases g with ⟨g_dom, g⟩
obtain rfl : f_dom = g_dom := h
congr
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
apply h'
/-- A dependent version of `ext`. -/
theorem dExt {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.domain = g.domain)
(h' : ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y) : f = g :=
ext h fun _ _ _ ↦ h' rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toFun.map_zero
theorem ext_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f = g ↔
f.domain = g.domain ∧
∀ ⦃x : E⦄ ⦃hf : x ∈ f.domain⦄ ⦃hg : x ∈ g.domain⦄, f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩ :=
⟨by rintro rfl; simp, fun ⟨deq, feq⟩ ↦ ext deq feq⟩
theorem dExt_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f = g ↔
∃ _domain_eq : f.domain = g.domain,
∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y :=
⟨fun EQ =>
EQ ▸
⟨rfl, fun x y h => by
congr
exact mod_cast h⟩,
fun ⟨deq, feq⟩ => dExt deq feq⟩
theorem ext' {s : Submodule R E} {f g : s →ₗ[R] F} (h : f = g) : mk s f = mk s g :=
h ▸ rfl
theorem map_add (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
f.toFun.map_add x y
theorem map_neg (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f (-x) = -f x :=
f.toFun.map_neg x
theorem map_sub (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
f.toFun.map_sub x y
theorem map_smul (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (c : R) (x : f.domain) : f (c • x) = c • f x :=
f.toFun.map_smul c x
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (p : Submodule R E) (f : p →ₗ[R] F) (x : p) : mk p f x = f x :=
rfl
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `R ∙ x` that sends `x` to `y`. This version works for modules
over rings, and requires a proof of `∀ c, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0`. -/
noncomputable def mkSpanSingleton' (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
E →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := R ∙ x
toFun :=
have H : ∀ c₁ c₂ : R, c₁ • x = c₂ • x → c₁ • y = c₂ • y := by
intro c₁ c₂ h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul] at h ⊢
exact H _ h
{ toFun z := Classical.choose (mem_span_singleton.1 z.prop) • y
map_add' y z := by
rw [← add_smul, H]
have (w : R ∙ x) := Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)
simp only [add_smul, sub_smul, this, ← coe_add]
map_smul' c z := by
rw [smul_smul, H]
have (w : R ∙ x) := Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)
simp only [mul_smul, this]
apply coe_smul }
@[simp]
theorem domain_mkSpanSingleton (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
(mkSpanSingleton' x y H).domain = R ∙ x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (c : R) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨c • x, h⟩ = c • y := by
dsimp [mkSpanSingleton']
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul]
apply H
simp only [sub_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_zero]
apply Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 h)
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨x, h⟩ = y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R y]
rw [← mkSpanSingleton'_apply x y H 1 ?_]
· congr
rw [one_smul]
· rwa [one_smul]
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `span R {x}` that sends a non-zero vector `x` to `y`.
This version works for modules over division rings. -/
noncomputable abbrev mkSpanSingleton {K E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E]
[AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ≠ 0) : E →ₗ.[K] F :=
mkSpanSingleton' x y fun c hc =>
(smul_eq_zero.1 hc).elim (fun hc => by rw [hc, zero_smul]) fun hx' => absurd hx' hx
theorem mkSpanSingleton_apply (K : Type*) {E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module K E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : F) :
mkSpanSingleton x y hx ⟨x, (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x : x ∈ Submodule.span K {x})⟩ =
y :=
LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self _ _ _ _
/-- Projection to the first coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def fst (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] E where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.fst R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.fst p p' x = (x : E × F).1 :=
rfl
/-- Projection to the second coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def snd (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.snd R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.snd p p' x = (x : E × F).2 :=
rfl
instance le : LE (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => f.domain ≤ g.domain ∧ ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y⟩
theorem apply_comp_inclusion {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
T x = S (Submodule.inclusion h.1 x) :=
h.2 rfl
theorem exists_of_le {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
∃ y : S.domain, (x : E) = y ∧ T x = S y :=
⟨⟨x.1, h.1 x.2⟩, ⟨rfl, h.2 rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_domain_eq {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hle : f ≤ g) (heq : f.domain = g.domain) :
f = g :=
dExt heq hle.2
/-- Given two partial linear maps `f`, `g`, the set of points `x` such that
both `f` and `g` are defined at `x` and `f x = g x` form a submodule. -/
def eqLocus (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R E where
carrier := { x | ∃ (hf : x ∈ f.domain) (hg : x ∈ g.domain), f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩ }
zero_mem' := ⟨zero_mem _, zero_mem _, f.map_zero.trans g.map_zero.symm⟩
add_mem' {x y} := fun ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩ ⟨hfy, hgy, hy⟩ ↦
⟨add_mem hfx hfy, add_mem hgx hgy, by
simp_all [← AddMemClass.mk_add_mk, f.map_add, g.map_add]⟩
smul_mem' c x := fun ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨smul_mem _ c hfx, smul_mem _ c hgx, by
have {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hfx) : (⟨c • x, smul_mem _ c hfx⟩ : f.domain) = c • ⟨x, hfx⟩ := by simp
rw [this hfx, this hgx, f.map_smul, g.map_smul, hx]⟩
instance bot : Bot (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⟨⊥, 0⟩⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance semilatticeInf : SemilatticeInf (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl f := ⟨le_refl f.domain, fun _ _ h => Subtype.eq h ▸ rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨gh_le, gh_eq⟩ =>
⟨le_trans fg_le gh_le, fun x _ hxz =>
have hxy : (x : E) = inclusion fg_le x := rfl
(fg_eq hxy).trans (gh_eq <| hxy.symm.trans hxz)⟩
le_antisymm _ _ fg gf := eq_of_le_of_domain_eq fg (le_antisymm fg.1 gf.1)
inf f g := ⟨f.eqLocus g, f.toFun.comp <| inclusion fun _x hx => hx.fst⟩
le_inf := by
intro f g h ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨fh_le, fh_eq⟩
exact ⟨fun x hx =>
⟨fg_le hx, fh_le hx,
(fg_eq (x := ⟨x, hx⟩) rfl).symm.trans (fh_eq rfl)⟩,
fun x ⟨y, yg, hy⟩ h => fg_eq h⟩
inf_le_left f _ := ⟨fun _ hx => hx.fst, fun _ _ h => congr_arg f <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
inf_le_right _ g :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.snd.fst, fun ⟨_, _, _, hx⟩ _ h => hx.trans <| congr_arg g <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
instance orderBot : OrderBot (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le f :=
⟨bot_le, fun x y h => by
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq ((mem_bot R).1 x.2)
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h.symm.trans (congr_arg _ hx))
rw [hx, hy, map_zero, map_zero]⟩
theorem le_of_eqLocus_ge {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : f.domain ≤ f.eqLocus g) : f ≤ g :=
suffices f ≤ f ⊓ g from le_trans this inf_le_right
⟨H, fun _x _y hxy => ((inf_le_left : f ⊓ g ≤ f).2 hxy.symm).symm⟩
theorem domain_mono : StrictMono (@domain R _ E _ _ F _ _) := fun _f _g hlt =>
lt_of_le_of_ne hlt.1.1 fun heq => ne_of_lt hlt <| eq_of_le_of_domain_eq (le_of_lt hlt) heq
private theorem sup_aux (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
∃ fg : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) →ₗ[R] F,
∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)),
(x : E) + y = ↑z → fg z = f x + g y := by
choose x hx y hy hxy using fun z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) => mem_sup.1 z.prop
set fg := fun z => f ⟨x z, hx z⟩ + g ⟨y z, hy z⟩
have fg_eq : ∀ (x' : f.domain) (y' : g.domain) (z' : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain))
(_H : (x' : E) + y' = z'), fg z' = f x' + g y' := by
intro x' y' z' H
dsimp [fg]
rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, eq_comm, ← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply h
simp only [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hxy
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, coe_mk, coe_mk, hxy, ← sub_add, ← sub_sub, sub_self,
zero_sub, ← H]
apply neg_add_eq_sub
use { toFun := fg, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, fg_eq
· rintro ⟨z₁, hz₁⟩ ⟨z₂, hz₂⟩
rw [← add_assoc, add_right_comm (f _), ← map_add, add_assoc, ← map_add]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_add, coe_mk, ← add_assoc]
rw [add_right_comm (x _), hxy, add_assoc, hxy, coe_mk, coe_mk]
· intro c z
rw [smul_add, ← map_smul, ← map_smul]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_smul, coe_mk, ← smul_add, hxy, RingHom.id_apply]
/-- Given two partial linear maps that agree on the intersection of their domains,
`f.sup g h` is the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that agrees
with `f` and `g`. -/
protected noncomputable def sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose (sup_aux f g h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem domain_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
(f.sup g h).domain = f.domain ⊔ g.domain :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y)
(x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)) (hz : (↑x : E) + ↑y = ↑z) :
f.sup g H z = f x + g y :=
Classical.choose_spec (sup_aux f g H) x y z hz
protected theorem left_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : f ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_left, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← add_zero (f _), ← g.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
protected theorem right_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : g ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_right, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← zero_add (g _), ← f.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
protected theorem sup_le {f g h : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) (fh : f ≤ h) (gh : g ≤ h) :
f.sup g H ≤ h :=
have Hf : f ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.left_le_sup g H) fh
have Hg : g ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.right_le_sup g H) gh
le_of_eqLocus_ge <| sup_le Hf.1 Hg.1
/-- Hypothesis for `LinearPMap.sup` holds, if `f.domain` is disjoint with `g.domain`. -/
theorem sup_h_of_disjoint (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (h : Disjoint f.domain g.domain) (x : f.domain)
(y : g.domain) (hxy : (x : E) = y) : f x = g y := by
rw [disjoint_def] at h
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h y (hxy ▸ x.2) y.2)
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq (hxy.trans <| congr_arg _ hy)
simp [*]
/-! ### Algebraic operations -/
section Zero
instance instZero : Zero (E →ₗ.[R] F) := ⟨⊤, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_domain : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : (⊤ : Submodule R E)) : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F) x = 0 := rfl
end Zero
section SMul
variable {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F]
variable [Monoid N] [DistribMulAction N F] [SMulCommClass R N F]
instance instSMul : SMul M (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a f =>
{ domain := f.domain
toFun := a • f.toFun }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_domain (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (a • f).domain = f.domain :=
rfl
theorem smul_apply (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (a • f).domain) : (a • f) x = a • f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(a • f) = a • ⇑f :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass M N F] : SMulCommClass M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_comm a b f.toFun⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower M N F] : IsScalarTower M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_assoc a b f.toFun⟩
instance instMulAction : MulAction M (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := fun ⟨_s, f⟩ => ext' <| one_smul M f
mul_smul a b f := ext' <| mul_smul a b f.toFun
end SMul
instance instNeg : Neg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f.domain, -f.toFun⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (-f).domain = f.domain := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : (-f) x = -f x :=
rfl
instance instInvolutiveNeg : InvolutiveNeg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· rfl
· simp only [neg_apply, neg_neg]⟩
section Add
instance instAdd : Add (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
+ g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem add_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f + g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem add_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f + g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ + g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instAddSemigroup : AddSemigroup (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g h => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_assoc]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_assoc]⟩
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, zero_add],
fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, add_zero]⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
zero_add f := by
simp
add_zero := by
simp
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_comm]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_comm]⟩
end Add
section VAdd
instance instVAdd : VAdd (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := g.domain
toFun := f.comp g.domain.subtype + g.toFun }⟩
@[simp]
theorem vadd_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f +ᵥ g).domain = g.domain :=
rfl
theorem vadd_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f +ᵥ g).domain) :
(f +ᵥ g) x = f x + g x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_vadd (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(f +ᵥ g) = ⇑(f.comp g.domain.subtype) + ⇑g :=
rfl
instance instAddAction : AddAction (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
vadd := (· +ᵥ ·)
zero_vadd := fun ⟨_s, _f⟩ => ext' <| zero_add _
add_vadd := fun _f₁ _f₂ ⟨_s, _g⟩ => ext' <| LinearMap.ext fun _x => add_assoc _ _ _
end VAdd
section Sub
instance instSub : Sub (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
- g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem sub_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f - g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem sub_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f - g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ - g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instSubtractionCommMonoid : SubtractionCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
add_comm := add_comm
sub_eq_add_neg f g := by
ext x _ h
· rfl
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_neg := neg_neg
neg_add_rev f g := by
ext x _ h
· simp [add_domain, sub_domain, neg_domain, And.comm]
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_eq_of_add f g h' := by
ext x hf hg
· have : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := zero_domain
simp only [← h', add_domain, inf_eq_top_iff] at this
rw [neg_domain, this.1, this.2]
simp only [neg_domain, neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]
rw [ext_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨hdom, h'⟩
rw [zero_domain] at hdom
simp only [hdom, neg_domain, zero_domain, mem_top, zero_apply, forall_true_left] at h'
apply h'
zsmul := zsmulRec
end Sub
section
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [Module K E] [Module K F]
/-- Extend a `LinearPMap` to `f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x`. -/
noncomputable def supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
E →ₗ.[K] F :=
f.sup (mkSpanSingleton x y fun h₀ => hx <| h₀.symm ▸ f.domain.zero_mem) <|
sup_h_of_disjoint _ _ <| by simpa [disjoint_span_singleton] using fun h ↦ False.elim <| hx h
@[simp]
theorem domain_supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
(f.supSpanSingleton x y hx).domain = f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem supSpanSingleton_apply_mk (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) (x' : E)
(hx' : x' ∈ f.domain) (c : K) :
f.supSpanSingleton x y hx
⟨x' + c • x, mem_sup.2 ⟨x', hx', _, mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩ =
f ⟨x', hx'⟩ + c • y := by
unfold supSpanSingleton
rw [sup_apply _ ⟨x', hx'⟩ ⟨c • x, _⟩, mkSpanSingleton'_apply]
· exact mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩
· rfl
end
private theorem sSup_aux (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) :
∃ f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) →ₗ[R] F, (⟨_, f⟩ : E →ₗ.[R] F) ∈ upperBounds c := by
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ceq | cne
· subst c
simp
have hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (domain '' c) :=
directedOn_image.2 (hc.mono @(domain_mono.monotone))
have P : ∀ x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)), { p : c // (x : E) ∈ p.val.domain } := by
rintro x
apply Classical.indefiniteDescription
have := (mem_sSup_of_directed (cne.image _) hdir).1 x.2
rwa [Set.exists_mem_image, ← bex_def, SetCoe.exists'] at this
set f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) → F := fun x => (P x).val.val ⟨x, (P x).property⟩
have f_eq : ∀ (p : c) (x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c))) (y : p.1.1) (_hxy : (x : E) = y),
f x = p.1 y := by
intro p x y hxy
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 p.1 p.2 with ⟨q, _hqc, ⟨hxq1, hxq2⟩, ⟨hpq1, hpq2⟩⟩
exact (hxq2 (y := ⟨y, hpq1 y.2⟩) hxy).trans (hpq2 rfl).symm
use { toFun := f, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, ?_
· intro x y
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 (P y).1.1 (P y).1.2 with ⟨p, hpc, hpx, hpy⟩
set x' := inclusion hpx.1 ⟨x, (P x).2⟩
set y' := inclusion hpy.1 ⟨y, (P y).2⟩
rw [f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ x x' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ y y' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ (x + y) (x' + y') rfl,
map_add]
· intro c x
simp only [RingHom.id_apply]
rw [f_eq (P x).1 (c • x) (c • ⟨x, (P x).2⟩) rfl, ← map_smul]
· intro p hpc
refine ⟨le_sSup <| Set.mem_image_of_mem domain hpc, fun x y hxy => Eq.symm ?_⟩
exact f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ _ _ hxy.symm
protected noncomputable def sSup (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose <| sSup_aux c hc⟩
protected theorem le_sSup {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {f : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hf : f ∈ c) : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc :=
Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hf
protected theorem sSup_le {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {g : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hg : ∀ f ∈ c, f ≤ g) : LinearPMap.sSup c hc ≤ g :=
le_of_eqLocus_ge <|
sSup_le fun _ ⟨f, hf, Eq⟩ =>
Eq ▸
have : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc ⊓ g := le_inf (LinearPMap.le_sSup _ hf) (hg f hf)
this.1
protected theorem sSup_apply {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {l : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hl : l ∈ c) (x : l.domain) :
(LinearPMap.sSup c hc) ⟨x, (LinearPMap.le_sSup hc hl).1 x.2⟩ = l x := by
symm
apply (Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hl).2
rfl
end LinearPMap
namespace LinearMap
/-- Restrict a linear map to a submodule, reinterpreting the result as a `LinearPMap`. -/
def toPMap (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨p, f.comp p.subtype⟩
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) (x : p) : f.toPMap p x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : (f.toPMap p).domain = p :=
rfl
/-- Compose a linear map with a `LinearPMap` -/
def compPMap (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain
toFun := g.comp f.toFun
@[simp]
theorem compPMap_apply (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : g.compPMap f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearPMap
/-- Restrict codomain of a `LinearPMap` -/
def codRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (p : Submodule R F) (H : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) : E →ₗ.[R] p where
domain := f.domain
toFun := f.toFun.codRestrict p H
/-- Compose two `LinearPMap`s -/
def comp (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (H : ∀ x : f.domain, f x ∈ g.domain) : E →ₗ.[R] G :=
g.toFun.compPMap <| f.codRestrict _ H
/-- `f.coprod g` is the partially defined linear map defined on `f.domain × g.domain`,
and sending `p` to `f p.1 + g p.2`. -/
def coprod (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) : E × F →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain.prod g.domain
toFun :=
-- Porting note: This is just
-- `(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun +`
-- ` (g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun`,
HAdd.hAdd
(α := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(β := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun
(g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (x) :
f.coprod g x = f ⟨(x : E × F).1, x.2.1⟩ + g ⟨(x : E × F).2, x.2.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Restrict a partially defined linear map to a submodule of `E` contained in `f.domain`. -/
def domRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (S : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨S ⊓ f.domain, f.toFun.comp (Submodule.inclusion (by simp))⟩
@[simp]
theorem domRestrict_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {S : Submodule R E} :
(f.domRestrict S).domain = S ⊓ f.domain :=
rfl
theorem domRestrict_apply {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} ⦃x : ↥(S ⊓ f.domain)⦄ ⦃y : f.domain⦄
(h : (x : E) = y) : f.domRestrict S x = f y := by
have : Submodule.inclusion (by simp) x = y := by
ext
simp [h]
rw [← this]
exact LinearPMap.mk_apply _ _ _
theorem domRestrict_le {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} : f.domRestrict S ≤ f :=
⟨by simp, fun _ _ hxy => domRestrict_apply hxy⟩
/-! ### Graph -/
section Graph
/-- The graph of a `LinearPMap` viewed as a submodule on `E × F`. -/
def graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R (E × F) :=
f.toFun.graph.map (f.domain.subtype.prodMap (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))
theorem mem_graph_iff' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y, f y) = x := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y : E) = x.1 ∧ f y = x.2 := by
cases x
simp_rw [mem_graph_iff', Prod.mk_inj]
/-- The tuple `(x, f x)` is contained in the graph of `f`. -/
theorem mem_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : domain f) : ((x : E), f x) ∈ f.graph := by simp
theorem graph_map_fst_eq_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) = f.domain := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left,
LinearMap.fst_apply, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨x, hx, _⟩
exact hx
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
simp only [h, exists_const]
theorem graph_map_snd_eq_range (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.snd R E F) = LinearMap.range f.toFun := by ext; simp
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F] (y : M)
/-- The graph of `z • f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem smul_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (z : M) :
(z • f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (z • (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext ⟨x_fst, x_snd⟩
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.smul_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.smul_apply, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.smul_apply,
Prod.mk_inj] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
/-- The graph of `-f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem neg_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
(-f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (-(LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext ⟨x_fst, x_snd⟩
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.neg_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.neg_apply, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.neg_apply,
Prod.mk_inj] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E} {x' y' : F} (hx : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hy : (y, y') ∈ f.graph) (hxy : x = y) : x' = y' := by
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx hy
rcases hx with ⟨x'', hx1, hx2⟩
rcases hy with ⟨y'', hy1, hy2⟩
simp only at hx1 hx2 hy1 hy2
rw [← hx1, ← hy1, SetLike.coe_eq_coe] at hxy
rw [← hx2, ← hy2, hxy]
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E × F} (hx : x ∈ f.graph) (hy : y ∈ f.graph)
(hxy : x.1 = y.1) : x.2 = y.2 := by
cases x
cases y
exact f.mem_graph_snd_inj hx hy hxy
/-- The property that `f 0 = 0` in terms of the graph. -/
theorem graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E} {x' : F} (h : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hx : x = 0) : x' = 0 :=
f.mem_graph_snd_inj h f.graph.zero_mem hx
theorem mem_domain_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} : x ∈ f.domain ↔ ∃ y : F, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, h⟩
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
obtain ⟨x', h⟩ := h
simp only at h
rw [← h.1]
simp
theorem mem_domain_of_mem_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (h : (x, y) ∈ f.graph) :
x ∈ f.domain := by
rw [mem_domain_iff]
exact ⟨y, h⟩
theorem image_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (hx : x ∈ f.domain) :
y = f ⟨x, hx⟩ ↔ (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
rw [mem_graph_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· use ⟨x, hx⟩
simp [h]
rcases h with ⟨⟨x', hx'⟩, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at h1 h2
simp only [← h2, h1]
theorem mem_range_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {y : F} : y ∈ Set.range f ↔ ∃ x : E, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [Set.mem_range] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h⟩
use x
rw [← h]
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := h
rw [Set.mem_range]
use x
simp only at h
rw [h.2]
theorem mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) {x : E} :
x ∈ f.domain ↔ x ∈ g.domain := by simp_rw [mem_domain_iff, h]
theorem le_of_le_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph ≤ g.graph) : f ≤ g := by
constructor
· intro x hx
rw [mem_domain_iff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hx⟩ := hx
use y
exact h hx
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
rw [image_iff]
refine h ?_
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at hxy
rw [hxy] at hx
rw [← image_iff hx]
simp [hxy]
theorem le_graph_of_le {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f ≤ g) : f.graph ≤ g.graph := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hx⟩ := hx
use ⟨y, h.1 y.2⟩
simp only [hx, Submodule.coe_mk, eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
convert hx.2 using 1
refine (h.2 ?_).symm
simp only [hx.1, Submodule.coe_mk]
theorem le_graph_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} : f.graph ≤ g.graph ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨le_of_le_graph, le_graph_of_le⟩
theorem eq_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) : f = g := by
apply dExt
· ext
exact mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph h
· apply (le_of_le_graph h.le).2
end Graph
end LinearPMap
namespace Submodule
section SubmoduleToLinearPMap
theorem existsUnique_from_graph {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ {x : E × F} (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : ∃! b : F, (a, b) ∈ g := by
refine existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique ?_ ?_
· convert ha
simp
intro y₁ y₂ hy₁ hy₂
have hy : ((0 : E), y₁ - y₂) ∈ g := by
convert g.sub_mem hy₁ hy₂
exact (sub_self _).symm
exact sub_eq_zero.mp (hg hy (by simp))
/-- Auxiliary definition to unfold the existential quantifier. -/
noncomputable def valFromGraph {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : F :=
(ExistsUnique.exists (existsUnique_from_graph @hg ha)).choose
theorem valFromGraph_mem {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : (a, valFromGraph hg ha) ∈ g :=
(ExistsUnique.exists (existsUnique_from_graph @hg ha)).choose_spec
/-- Define a `LinearMap` from its graph.
Helper definition for `LinearPMap`. -/
noncomputable def toLinearPMapAux (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) →ₗ[R] F where
toFun := fun x => valFromGraph hg x.2
map_add' := fun v w => by
have hadd := (g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)).add_mem v.2 w.2
have hvw := valFromGraph_mem hg hadd
have hvw' := g.add_mem (valFromGraph_mem hg v.2) (valFromGraph_mem hg w.2)
rw [Prod.mk_add_mk] at hvw'
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hadd).unique hvw hvw'
map_smul' := fun a v => by
have hsmul := (g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)).smul_mem a v.2
have hav := valFromGraph_mem hg hsmul
have hav' := g.smul_mem a (valFromGraph_mem hg v.2)
rw [Prod.smul_mk] at hav'
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hsmul).unique hav hav'
open scoped Classical in
/-- Define a `LinearPMap` from its graph.
In the case that the submodule is not a graph of a `LinearPMap` then the underlying linear map
is just the zero map. -/
noncomputable def toLinearPMap (g : Submodule R (E × F)) : E →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)
toFun := if hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0 then
g.toLinearPMapAux hg else 0
theorem toLinearPMap_domain (g : Submodule R (E × F)) :
g.toLinearPMap.domain = g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) := rfl
theorem toLinearPMap_apply_aux {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0)
(x : g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) :
g.toLinearPMap x = valFromGraph hg x.2 := by
classical
change (if hg : _ then g.toLinearPMapAux hg else 0) x = _
rw [dif_pos]
· rfl
· exact hg
theorem mem_graph_toLinearPMap {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0)
(x : g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : (x.val, g.toLinearPMap x) ∈ g := by
rw [toLinearPMap_apply_aux hg]
exact valFromGraph_mem hg x.2
@[simp]
theorem toLinearPMap_graph_eq (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
g.toLinearPMap.graph = g := by
ext ⟨x_fst, x_snd⟩
constructor <;> intro hx
· rw [LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hx1, hx2⟩
convert g.mem_graph_toLinearPMap hg y using 1
exact Prod.ext hx1.symm hx2.symm
rw [LinearPMap.mem_graph_iff]
have hx_fst : x_fst ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) := by
simp only [mem_map, LinearMap.fst_apply, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
exact ⟨x_snd, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x_fst, hx_fst⟩, Subtype.coe_mk x_fst hx_fst, ?_⟩
rw [toLinearPMap_apply_aux hg]
exact (existsUnique_from_graph @hg hx_fst).unique (valFromGraph_mem hg hx_fst) hx
theorem toLinearPMap_range (g : Submodule R (E × F))
(hg : ∀ (x : E × F) (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) :
LinearMap.range g.toLinearPMap.toFun = g.map (LinearMap.snd R E F) := by
rwa [← LinearPMap.graph_map_snd_eq_range, toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
end SubmoduleToLinearPMap
end Submodule
namespace LinearPMap
section inverse
/-- The inverse of a `LinearPMap`. -/
noncomputable def inverse (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : F →ₗ.[R] E :=
(f.graph.map (LinearEquiv.prodComm R E F)).toLinearPMap
variable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F}
theorem inverse_domain : (inverse f).domain = LinearMap.range f.toFun := by
rw [inverse, Submodule.toLinearPMap_domain, ← graph_map_snd_eq_range,
← LinearEquiv.fst_comp_prodComm, Submodule.map_comp]
rfl
variable (hf : LinearMap.ker f.toFun = ⊥)
include hf
/-- The graph of the inverse generates a `LinearPMap`. -/
theorem mem_inverse_graph_snd_eq_zero (x : F × E)
(hv : x ∈ (graph f).map (LinearEquiv.prodComm R E F))
(hv' : x.fst = 0) : x.snd = 0 := by
simp only [Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left,
LinearEquiv.prodComm_apply, Prod.exists, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, h1⟩, ⟨h2, h3⟩⟩
simp only at hv' ⊢
rw [hv'] at h1
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot'] at hf
specialize hf ⟨a, ha⟩ h1
simp only [Submodule.mk_eq_zero] at hf
exact hf
theorem inverse_graph : (inverse f).graph = f.graph.map (LinearEquiv.prodComm R E F) := by
rw [inverse, Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq _ (mem_inverse_graph_snd_eq_zero hf)]
theorem inverse_range : LinearMap.range (inverse f).toFun = f.domain := by
rw [inverse, Submodule.toLinearPMap_range _ (mem_inverse_graph_snd_eq_zero hf),
← graph_map_fst_eq_domain, ← LinearEquiv.snd_comp_prodComm, Submodule.map_comp]
rfl
theorem mem_inverse_graph (x : f.domain) : (f x, (x : E)) ∈ (inverse f).graph := by
simp only [inverse_graph hf, Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left,
exists_eq_left, LinearEquiv.prodComm_apply, Prod.exists, Prod.swap_prod_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact ⟨(x : E), f x, ⟨x.2, Eq.refl _⟩, Eq.refl _, Eq.refl _⟩
theorem inverse_apply_eq {y : (inverse f).domain} {x : f.domain} (hxy : f x = y) :
(inverse f) y = x := by
have := mem_inverse_graph hf x
simp only [mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left] at this
rcases this with ⟨hx, h⟩
rw [← h]
congr
simp only [hxy, Subtype.coe_eta]
end inverse
end LinearPMap
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/LinearPMap.lean | 1,104 | 1,105 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Constant speed
This file defines the notion of constant (and unit) speed for a function `f : ℝ → E` with
pseudo-emetric structure on `E` with respect to a set `s : Set ℝ` and "speed" `l : ℝ≥0`, and shows
that if `f` has locally bounded variation on `s`, it can be obtained (up to distance zero, on `s`),
as a composite `φ ∘ (variationOnFromTo f s a)`, where `φ` has unit speed and `a ∈ s`.
## Main definitions
* `HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `l`.
* `HasUnitSpeedOn f s`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `1`.
* `naturalParameterization f s a : ℝ → E`, the unit speed reparameterization of `f` on `s` relative
to `a`.
## Main statements
* `unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero` proves that if `f` and `f ∘ φ` are both naturally
parameterized on closed intervals starting at `0`, then `φ` must be the identity on
those intervals.
* `edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero` proves that if `f` has locally bounded variation, then
precomposing `naturalParameterization f s a` with `variationOnFromTo f s a` yields a function
at distance zero from `f` on `s`.
* `has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization` proves that if `f` has locally bounded
variation, then `naturalParameterization f s a` has unit speed on `s`.
## Tags
arc-length, parameterization
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
open Set
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
variable (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (l : ℝ≥0)
/-- `f` has constant speed `l` on `s` if the variation of `f` on `s ∩ Icc x y` is equal to
`l * (y - x)` for any `x y` in `s`.
-/
def HasConstantSpeedOnWith :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x))
variable {f s l}
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn (h : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l) :
LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s := fun x y hx hy => by
simp only [BoundedVariationOn, h hx hy, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_iff]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_of_subsingleton (f : ℝ → E) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(l : ℝ≥0) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l := by
rintro x hx y hy; cases hs hx hy
rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton f (fun y hy z hz => hs hy.1 hz.1 : (s ∩ Icc x x).Subsingleton)]
simp only [sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s),
x ≤ y → eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x)) := by
refine ⟨fun h x xs y ys _ => h xs ys, fun h x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact h xs ys xy
· rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton, ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos]
· exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos l.prop (sub_nonpos_of_le yx)
· rintro z ⟨zs, xz, zy⟩ w ⟨ws, xw, wy⟩
cases le_antisymm (zy.trans yx) xz
cases le_antisymm (wy.trans yx) xw
rfl
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), variationOnFromTo f s x y = l * (y - x) := by
constructor
· rintro h; refine ⟨h.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn, fun x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at h
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, h xs ys xy]
exact ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr xy))
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_ge f s yx, h ys xs yx]
have := ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr yx))
simp_all only [NNReal.val_eq_coe]; ring
· rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered]
rintro h x xs y ys xy
rw [← h.2 xs ys, variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (h.1 x y xs ys)]
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union {t : Set ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f t l) {x : ℝ} (hs : IsGreatest s x) (ht : IsLeast t x) :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (s ∪ t) l := by
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at hfs hft ⊢
rintro z (zs | zt) y (ys | yt) zy
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨ws, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨(le_antisymm (wy.trans (hs.2 ys)) (ht.2 wt)).symm ▸ hs.1, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨ws, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inl ws, zwy⟩
rw [this, hfs zs ys zy]
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z x ∪ t ∩ Icc x y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
exacts [Or.inl ⟨ws, zw, hs.2 ws⟩, Or.inr ⟨wt, ht.2 wt, wy⟩]
· rintro (⟨ws, zw, wx⟩ | ⟨wt, xw, wy⟩)
exacts [⟨Or.inl ws, zw, wx.trans (ht.2 yt)⟩, ⟨Or.inr wt, (hs.2 zs).trans xw, wy⟩]
rw [this, @eVariationOn.union _ _ _ _ f _ _ x, hfs zs hs.1 (hs.2 zs), hft ht.1 yt (ht.2 yt)]
· have q := ENNReal.ofReal_add (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (hs.2 zs)))
(mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (ht.2 yt)))
simp only [NNReal.val_eq_coe] at q
rw [← q]
ring_nf
exacts [⟨⟨hs.1, hs.2 zs, le_rfl⟩, fun w ⟨_, _, wx⟩ => wx⟩,
⟨⟨ht.1, le_rfl, ht.2 yt⟩, fun w ⟨_, xw, _⟩ => xw⟩]
· cases le_antisymm zy ((hs.2 ys).trans (ht.2 zt))
simp only [Icc_self, sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact eVariationOn.subsingleton _ fun _ ⟨_, uz⟩ _ ⟨_, vz⟩ => uz.trans vz.symm
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = t ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨le_antisymm ((ht.2 zt).trans zw) (hs.2 ws) ▸ ht.1, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨wt, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨wt, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inr wt, zwy⟩
rw [this, hft zt yt zy]
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc {x y z : ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x y) l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc y z) l) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x z) l := by
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rcases le_total y z with (yz | zy)
· rw [← Set.Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc xy yz]
exact hfs.union hft (isGreatest_Icc xy) (isLeast_Icc yz)
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hfs ⟨xu, uz.trans zy⟩ ⟨xv, vz.trans zy⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu,
inf_of_le_right (vz.trans zy)]
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hft ⟨yx.trans xu, uz⟩ ⟨yx.trans xv, vz⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right (yx.trans xu),
inf_of_le_right vz]
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_zero_iff :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s 0 ↔ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), edist (f x) (f y) = 0 := by
dsimp [HasConstantSpeedOnWith]
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· by_contra!
obtain ⟨h, hfs⟩ := this
simp_rw [ne_eq, eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff] at hfs h
| push_neg at hfs
obtain ⟨x, xs, y, ys, hxy⟩ := hfs
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact hxy (h xs ys x ⟨xs, le_rfl, xy⟩ y ⟨ys, xy, le_rfl⟩)
· rw [edist_comm] at hxy
exact hxy (h ys xs y ⟨ys, le_rfl, yx⟩ x ⟨xs, yx, le_rfl⟩)
· rintro h x _ y _
refine le_antisymm ?_ zero_le'
rw [← h]
exact eVariationOn.mono f inter_subset_left
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio {l' : ℝ≥0} (hl' : l' ≠ 0) {φ : ℝ → ℝ} (φm : MonotoneOn φ s)
(hfφ : HasConstantSpeedOnWith (f ∘ φ) s l) (hf : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (φ '' s) l') ⦃x : ℝ⦄
(xs : x ∈ s) : EqOn φ (fun y => l / l' * (y - x) + φ x) s := by
rintro y ys
rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, eq_div_iff (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr hl')]
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hf
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hfφ
| Mathlib/Analysis/ConstantSpeed.lean | 156 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
· intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
apply AnalyticOn.comp _ _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
· exact ContinuousLinearEquiv.analyticOn _ _
· exact (h'p i).comp (g.analyticOn _) (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
((((hf.of_le hi).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap
g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl h's hx).symm
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear equiv. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
| · ext1
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 392 | 398 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
| (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 409 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
| variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 80 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Action
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
/-!
# Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `Set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`inducedOuterMeasure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = MeasurableSet`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end.
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by
classical
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
theorem le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s := by
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro
rfl
-- TODO: why this is a bad `congr` lemma?
theorem extend_congr {β : Type*} {Pb : β → Prop} {mb : ∀ s : β, Pb s → ℝ≥0∞} {sa : α} {sb : β}
(hP : P sa ↔ Pb sb) (hm : ∀ (ha : P sa) (hb : Pb sb), m sa ha = mb sb hb) :
extend m sa = extend mb sb :=
iInf_congr_Prop hP fun _h => hm _ _
@[simp]
theorem extend_top {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop} : extend (fun _ _ => ∞ : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ :=
funext fun _ => iInf_eq_top.mpr fun _ => rfl
end Extend
section ExtendSet
variable {α : Type*} {P : Set α → Prop}
variable {m : ∀ s : Set α, P s → ℝ≥0∞}
variable (P0 : P ∅) (m0 : m ∅ P0 = 0)
variable (PU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (_hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), P (⋃ i, f i))
variable
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (msU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (m_mono : ∀ ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (hs₁ : P s₁) (hs₂ : P s₂), s₁ ⊆ s₂ → m s₁ hs₁ ≤ m s₂ hs₂)
theorem extend_iUnion_nat {f : ℕ → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, P (f i))
(mU : m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i)) :
extend m (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, extend m (f i) :=
(extend_eq _ _).trans <|
mU.trans <| by
congr with i
rw [extend_eq]
include P0 m0 in
theorem extend_empty : extend m ∅ = 0 :=
(extend_eq _ P0).trans m0
section Subadditive
include PU msU in
theorem extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' (s : ℕ → Set α) :
extend m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, extend m (s i) := by
by_cases h : ∀ i, P (s i)
· rw [extend_eq _ (PU h), congr_arg tsum _]
· apply msU h
funext i
apply extend_eq _ (h i)
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := not_forall.1 h
exact le_trans (le_iInf fun h => hi.elim h) (ENNReal.le_tsum i)
end Subadditive
section Mono
include m_mono in
theorem extend_mono' ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (h₁ : P s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ := by
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h₂
rw [extend_eq m h₁]
exact m_mono h₁ h₂ hs
end Mono
section Unions
include P0 m0 PU mU in
theorem extend_iUnion {β} [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(hm : ∀ i, P (f i)) : extend m (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, extend m (f i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
rw [← Encodable.iUnion_decode₂, ← tsum_iUnion_decode₂]
· exact
extend_iUnion_nat PU (fun n => Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_cases P0 hm)
(mU _ (Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hd))
· exact extend_empty P0 m0
include P0 m0 PU mU in
theorem extend_union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : P s₁) (h₂ : P s₂) :
extend m (s₁ ∪ s₂) = extend m s₁ + extend m s₂ := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion,
extend_iUnion P0 m0 PU mU (pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 hd) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩),
tsum_fintype]
simp
end Unions
variable (m)
/-- Given an arbitrary function on a subset of sets, we can define the outer measure corresponding
to it (this is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most `m` on the domain of `m`). -/
def inducedOuterMeasure : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (extend m) (extend_empty P0 m0)
variable {m P0 m0}
theorem le_inducedOuterMeasure {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 ↔ ∀ (s) (hs : P s), μ s ≤ m s hs :=
le_ofFunction.trans <| forall_congr' fun _s => le_iInf_iff
/-- If `P u` is `False` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `P u = diam u < r`, then this lemma implies that
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`. -/
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_union_of_false_of_nonempty_inter {s t : Set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (t ∩ u).Nonempty → ¬P u) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (s ∪ t) =
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s + inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t :=
ofFunction_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter fun u hsu htu => @iInf_of_empty _ _ _ ⟨h u hsu htu⟩ _
include PU msU m_mono
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend' {s : Set α} (hs : P s) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = extend m s :=
ofFunction_eq s (fun _t => extend_mono' m_mono hs) (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' PU msU)
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq' {s : Set α} (hs : P s) : inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = m s hs :=
(inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend' PU msU m_mono hs).trans <| extend_eq _ _
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = ⨅ (t : Set α) (ht : P t) (_ : s ⊆ t), m t ht := by
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff]
intro t ht hs
refine le_trans (measure_mono hs) ?_
exact le_of_eq (inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono _)
· refine le_iInf ?_
intro f
refine le_iInf ?_
intro hf
refine le_trans ?_ (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' _ msU _)
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h2f
exact iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf_le_of_le h2f <| iInf_le _ hf)
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_preimage (f : α ≃ α) (Pm : ∀ s : Set α, P (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ P s)
(mm : ∀ (s : Set α) (hs : P s), m (f ⁻¹' s) ((Pm _).mpr hs) = m s hs) {A : Set α} :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (f ⁻¹' A) = inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 A := by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]; symm
refine f.injective.preimage_surjective.iInf_congr (preimage f) fun s => ?_
refine iInf_congr_Prop (Pm s) ?_; intro hs
refine iInf_congr_Prop f.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff ?_
intro _; exact mm s hs
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set {s : Set α} (hs : inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ t : Set α,
P t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t ≤ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s + ε := by
have h := ENNReal.lt_add_right hs hε
conv at h =>
lhs
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩
exact
⟨t, h1t, h2t, le_trans (le_of_eq <| inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono h1t) (le_of_lt h3t)⟩
/-- To test whether `s` is Carathéodory-measurable we only need to check the sets `t` for which
`P t` holds. See `ofFunction_caratheodory` for another way to show the Carathéodory-measurability
of `s`.
-/
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory (s : Set α) :
MeasurableSet[(inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0).caratheodory] s ↔
∀ t : Set α,
P t →
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (t ∩ s) + inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (t \ s) ≤
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t := by
rw [isCaratheodory_iff_le]
constructor
· intro h t _ht
exact h t
· intro h u
conv_rhs => rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]
refine le_iInf ?_
intro t
refine le_iInf ?_
intro ht
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h2t
refine le_trans ?_ ((h t ht).trans_eq <| inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono ht)
gcongr
end ExtendSet
/-! If `P` is `MeasurableSet` for some measurable space, then we can remove some hypotheses of the
above lemmas. -/
section MeasurableSpace
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
variable {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
variable (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
variable
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
include m0 mU
theorem extend_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ := by
refine le_iInf ?_; intro h₂
have :=
extend_union MeasurableSet.empty m0 MeasurableSet.iUnion mU disjoint_sdiff_self_right h₁
(h₂.diff h₁)
rw [union_diff_cancel hs] at this
rw [← extend_eq m]
exact le_iff_exists_add.2 ⟨_, this⟩
theorem extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α,
extend m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, extend m (s i) := by
refine extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' MeasurableSet.iUnion ?_; intro f h
| simp +singlePass only [iUnion_disjointed.symm]
rw [mU (MeasurableSet.disjointed h) (disjoint_disjointed _)]
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => ?_
rw [← extend_eq m, ← extend_eq m]
exact extend_mono m0 mU (MeasurableSet.disjointed h _) (disjointed_le f _)
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
inducedOuterMeasure m MeasurableSet.empty m0 s = extend m s :=
ofFunction_eq s (fun _t => extend_mono m0 mU hs) (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat m0 mU)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 279 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open scoped Matrix
open Module TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
variable (M) in
open Classical in
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
classical
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindexFinsetRange, ← traceAux_def, ← traceAux_def,
traceAux_eq R b b.reindexFinsetRange]
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) := by
classical
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, LinearMap.toMatrix_mul]
apply Matrix.trace_mul_comm
· rw [trace, dif_neg H, LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
lemma trace_mul_cycle (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g * h) = trace R M (h * f * g) := by
rw [LinearMap.trace_mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
lemma trace_mul_cycle' (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * (g * h)) = trace R M (h * (f * g)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, LinearMap.trace_mul_comm]
/-- The trace of an endomorphism is invariant under conjugation -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g := by
rw [trace_mul_comm]
simp
@[simp]
lemma trace_lie {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f g : Module.End R M) :
trace R M ⁅f, g⁆ = 0 := by
rw [Ring.lie_def, map_sub, trace_mul_comm]
exact sub_self _
end
|
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 116 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.Cofinal
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Principal
/-!
# Order ideals, cofinal sets, and the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma
## Main definitions
Throughout this file, `P` is at least a preorder, but some sections require more
structure, such as a bottom element, a top element, or a join-semilattice structure.
- `Order.Ideal P`: the type of nonempty, upward directed, and downward closed subsets of `P`.
Dual to the notion of a filter on a preorder.
- `Order.IsIdeal I`: a predicate for when a `Set P` is an ideal.
- `Order.Ideal.principal p`: the principal ideal generated by `p : P`.
- `Order.Ideal.IsProper I`: a predicate for proper ideals.
Dual to the notion of a proper filter.
- `Order.Ideal.IsMaximal I`: a predicate for maximal ideals.
Dual to the notion of an ultrafilter.
- `Order.Cofinal P`: the type of subsets of `P` containing arbitrarily large elements.
Dual to the notion of 'dense set' used in forcing.
- `Order.idealOfCofinals p 𝒟`, where `p : P`, and `𝒟` is a countable family of cofinal
subsets of `P`: an ideal in `P` which contains `p` and intersects every set in `𝒟`. (This a form
of the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma.)
## References
- <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_(order_theory)>
- <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cofinal_(mathematics)>
- <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasiowa%E2%80%93Sikorski_lemma>
Note that for the Rasiowa–Sikorski lemma, Wikipedia uses the opposite ordering on `P`,
in line with most presentations of forcing.
## Tags
ideal, cofinal, dense, countable, generic
-/
open Function Set
namespace Order
variable {P : Type*}
/-- An ideal on an order `P` is a subset of `P` that is
- nonempty
- upward directed (any pair of elements in the ideal has an upper bound in the ideal)
- downward closed (any element less than an element of the ideal is in the ideal). -/
structure Ideal (P) [LE P] extends LowerSet P where
/-- The ideal is nonempty. -/
nonempty' : carrier.Nonempty
/-- The ideal is upward directed. -/
directed' : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) carrier
-- TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
-- We keep this to be consistent with Lean 3.
initialize_simps_projections Ideal (+toLowerSet, -carrier)
/-- A subset of a preorder `P` is an ideal if it is
- nonempty
- upward directed (any pair of elements in the ideal has an upper bound in the ideal)
- downward closed (any element less than an element of the ideal is in the ideal). -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsIdeal {P} [LE P] (I : Set P) : Prop where
/-- The ideal is downward closed. -/
IsLowerSet : IsLowerSet I
/-- The ideal is nonempty. -/
Nonempty : I.Nonempty
/-- The ideal is upward directed. -/
Directed : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) I
/-- Create an element of type `Order.Ideal` from a set satisfying the predicate
`Order.IsIdeal`. -/
def IsIdeal.toIdeal [LE P] {I : Set P} (h : IsIdeal I) : Ideal P :=
⟨⟨I, h.IsLowerSet⟩, h.Nonempty, h.Directed⟩
namespace Ideal
section LE
variable [LE P]
section
variable {I s t : Ideal P} {x : P}
theorem toLowerSet_injective : Injective (toLowerSet : Ideal P → LowerSet P) := fun s t _ ↦ by
cases s
cases t
congr
instance : SetLike (Ideal P) P where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' _ _ h := toLowerSet_injective <| SetLike.coe_injective h
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : Ideal P} : (s : Set P) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : Ideal P) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLowerSet (s : Ideal P) : (s.toLowerSet : Set P) = s :=
rfl
protected theorem lower (s : Ideal P) : IsLowerSet (s : Set P) :=
s.lower'
protected theorem nonempty (s : Ideal P) : (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
s.nonempty'
protected theorem directed (s : Ideal P) : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (s : Set P) :=
s.directed'
protected theorem isIdeal (s : Ideal P) : IsIdeal (s : Set P) :=
⟨s.lower, s.nonempty, s.directed⟩
theorem mem_compl_of_ge {x y : P} : x ≤ y → x ∈ (I : Set P)ᶜ → y ∈ (I : Set P)ᶜ := fun h ↦
mt <| I.lower h
/-- The partial ordering by subset inclusion, inherited from `Set P`. -/
instance instPartialOrderIdeal : PartialOrder (Ideal P) :=
PartialOrder.lift SetLike.coe SetLike.coe_injective
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set P) ⊆ t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set P) ⊂ t ↔ s < t :=
Iff.rfl
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_le {x : P} {I J : Ideal P} : x ∈ I → I ≤ J → x ∈ J :=
@Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset P x I J
/-- A proper ideal is one that is not the whole set.
Note that the whole set might not be an ideal. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsProper (I : Ideal P) : Prop where
/-- This ideal is not the whole set. -/
ne_univ : (I : Set P) ≠ univ
theorem isProper_of_not_mem {I : Ideal P} {p : P} (nmem : p ∉ I) : IsProper I :=
⟨fun hp ↦ by
have := mem_univ p
rw [← hp] at this
exact nmem this⟩
/-- An ideal is maximal if it is maximal in the collection of proper ideals.
Note that `IsCoatom` is less general because ideals only have a top element when `P` is directed
and nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsMaximal (I : Ideal P) : Prop extends IsProper I where
/-- This ideal is maximal in the collection of proper ideals. -/
maximal_proper : ∀ ⦃J : Ideal P⦄, I < J → (J : Set P) = univ
theorem inter_nonempty [IsDirected P (· ≥ ·)] (I J : Ideal P) : (I ∩ J : Set P).Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := I.nonempty
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := J.nonempty
obtain ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := exists_le_le a b
exact ⟨c, I.lower hac ha, J.lower hbc hb⟩
end
section Directed
variable [IsDirected P (· ≤ ·)] [Nonempty P] {I : Ideal P}
/-- In a directed and nonempty order, the top ideal of a is `univ`. -/
instance : OrderTop (Ideal P) where
top := ⟨⊤, univ_nonempty, directedOn_univ⟩
le_top _ _ _ := LowerSet.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem top_toLowerSet : (⊤ : Ideal P).toLowerSet = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Ideal P) : Set P) = univ :=
rfl
theorem isProper_of_ne_top (ne_top : I ≠ ⊤) : IsProper I :=
⟨fun h ↦ ne_top <| ext h⟩
theorem IsProper.ne_top (_ : IsProper I) : I ≠ ⊤ :=
fun h ↦ IsProper.ne_univ <| congr_arg SetLike.coe h
theorem _root_.IsCoatom.isProper (hI : IsCoatom I) : IsProper I :=
isProper_of_ne_top hI.1
theorem isProper_iff_ne_top : IsProper I ↔ I ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne_top, fun h ↦ isProper_of_ne_top h⟩
theorem IsMaximal.isCoatom (_ : IsMaximal I) : IsCoatom I :=
⟨IsMaximal.toIsProper.ne_top, fun _ h ↦ ext <| IsMaximal.maximal_proper h⟩
theorem IsMaximal.isCoatom' [IsMaximal I] : IsCoatom I :=
IsMaximal.isCoatom ‹_›
theorem _root_.IsCoatom.isMaximal (hI : IsCoatom I) : IsMaximal I :=
{ IsCoatom.isProper hI with maximal_proper := fun _ hJ ↦ by simp [hI.2 _ hJ] }
theorem isMaximal_iff_isCoatom : IsMaximal I ↔ IsCoatom I :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.isCoatom, fun h ↦ IsCoatom.isMaximal h⟩
end Directed
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot P]
@[simp]
theorem bot_mem (s : Ideal P) : ⊥ ∈ s :=
s.lower bot_le s.nonempty'.some_mem
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop P] {I : Ideal P}
theorem top_of_top_mem (h : ⊤ ∈ I) : I = ⊤ := by
ext
exact iff_of_true (I.lower le_top h) trivial
theorem IsProper.top_not_mem (hI : IsProper I) : ⊤ ∉ I := fun h ↦ hI.ne_top <| top_of_top_mem h
end OrderTop
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder P]
section
variable {I : Ideal P} {x y : P}
/-- The smallest ideal containing a given element. -/
@[simps]
def principal (p : P) : Ideal P where
toLowerSet := LowerSet.Iic p
nonempty' := nonempty_Iic
directed' _ hx _ hy := ⟨p, le_rfl, hx, hy⟩
instance [Inhabited P] : Inhabited (Ideal P) :=
⟨Ideal.principal default⟩
@[simp]
theorem principal_le_iff : principal x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I :=
⟨fun h ↦ h le_rfl, fun hx _ hy ↦ I.lower hy hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_principal : x ∈ principal y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_principal_self : x ∈ principal x :=
mem_principal.2 (le_refl x)
end
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot P]
/-- There is a bottom ideal when `P` has a bottom element. -/
instance : OrderBot (Ideal P) where
bot := principal ⊥
bot_le := by simp
@[simp]
theorem principal_bot : principal (⊥ : P) = ⊥ :=
rfl
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop P]
@[simp]
theorem principal_top : principal (⊤ : P) = ⊤ :=
toLowerSet_injective <| LowerSet.Iic_top
end OrderTop
end Preorder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup P] {x y : P} {I s : Ideal P}
/-- A specific witness of `I.directed` when `P` has joins. -/
theorem sup_mem (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ⊔ y ∈ s :=
let ⟨_, hz, hx, hy⟩ := s.directed x hx y hy
s.lower (sup_le hx hy) hz
@[simp]
theorem sup_mem_iff : x ⊔ y ∈ I ↔ x ∈ I ∧ y ∈ I :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨I.lower le_sup_left h, I.lower le_sup_right h⟩, fun h ↦ sup_mem h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
lemma finsetSup_mem_iff {P : Type*} [SemilatticeSup P] [OrderBot P]
(t : Ideal P) {ι : Type*}
{f : ι → P} {s : Finset ι} : s.sup f ∈ t ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i ∈ t := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on <;> simp [*]
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeSupDirected
variable [SemilatticeSup P] [IsDirected P (· ≥ ·)] {x : P} {I J s t : Ideal P}
/-- The infimum of two ideals of a co-directed order is their intersection. -/
instance : Min (Ideal P) :=
⟨fun I J ↦
{ toLowerSet := I.toLowerSet ⊓ J.toLowerSet
nonempty' := inter_nonempty I J
directed' := fun x hx y hy ↦ ⟨x ⊔ y, ⟨sup_mem hx.1 hy.1, sup_mem hx.2 hy.2⟩, by simp⟩ }⟩
/-- The supremum of two ideals of a co-directed order is the union of the down sets of the pointwise
supremum of `I` and `J`. -/
instance : Max (Ideal P) :=
⟨fun I J ↦
{ carrier := { x | ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, x ≤ i ⊔ j }
nonempty' := by
obtain ⟨w, h⟩ := inter_nonempty I J
exact ⟨w, w, h.1, w, h.2, le_sup_left⟩
directed' := fun x ⟨xi, _, xj, _, _⟩ y ⟨yi, _, yj, _, _⟩ ↦
⟨x ⊔ y, ⟨xi ⊔ yi, sup_mem ‹_› ‹_›, xj ⊔ yj, sup_mem ‹_› ‹_›,
sup_le
(calc
x ≤ xi ⊔ xj := ‹_›
_ ≤ xi ⊔ yi ⊔ (xj ⊔ yj) := sup_le_sup le_sup_left le_sup_left)
(calc
y ≤ yi ⊔ yj := ‹_›
_ ≤ xi ⊔ yi ⊔ (xj ⊔ yj) := sup_le_sup le_sup_right le_sup_right)⟩,
le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
lower' := fun _ _ h ⟨yi, hi, yj, hj, hxy⟩ ↦ ⟨yi, hi, yj, hj, h.trans hxy⟩ }⟩
instance : Lattice (Ideal P) :=
{ Ideal.instPartialOrderIdeal with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ J i hi ↦
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := J.nonempty
⟨i, hi, w, hw, le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun I _ j hj ↦
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := I.nonempty
⟨w, hw, j, hj, le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ K hIK hJK _ ⟨_, hi, _, hj, ha⟩ ↦
K.lower ha <| sup_mem (mem_of_mem_of_le hi hIK) (mem_of_mem_of_le hj hJK)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ inter_subset_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ↦ subset_inter }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup : ↑(s ⊔ t) = { x | ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, x ≤ a ⊔ b } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set P) = ↑s ∩ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf : x ∈ I ⊓ J ↔ x ∈ I ∧ x ∈ J :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup : x ∈ I ⊔ J ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, x ≤ i ⊔ j :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_sup_principal_of_not_mem (hx : x ∉ I) : I < I ⊔ principal x :=
le_sup_left.lt_of_ne fun h ↦ hx <| by simpa only [left_eq_sup, principal_le_iff] using h
end SemilatticeSupDirected
section SemilatticeSupOrderBot
variable [SemilatticeSup P] [OrderBot P] {x : P}
instance : InfSet (Ideal P) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toLowerSet := ⨅ s ∈ S, toLowerSet s
nonempty' :=
⟨⊥, by
rw [LowerSet.carrier_eq_coe, LowerSet.coe_iInf₂, Set.mem_iInter₂]
exact fun s _ ↦ s.bot_mem⟩
directed' := fun a ha b hb ↦
⟨a ⊔ b,
⟨by
rw [LowerSet.carrier_eq_coe, LowerSet.coe_iInf₂, Set.mem_iInter₂] at ha hb ⊢
exact fun s hs ↦ sup_mem (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs), le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩⟩ }⟩
variable {S : Set (Ideal P)}
@[simp]
theorem coe_sInf : (↑(sInf S) : Set P) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
LowerSet.coe_iInf₂ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_sInf, mem_iInter₂]
instance : CompleteLattice (Ideal P) :=
{ (inferInstance : Lattice (Ideal P)),
completeLatticeOfInf (Ideal P) fun S ↦ by
refine ⟨fun s hs ↦ ?_, fun s hs ↦ by rwa [← coe_subset_coe, coe_sInf, subset_iInter₂_iff]⟩
rw [← coe_subset_coe, coe_sInf]
exact biInter_subset_of_mem hs with }
end SemilatticeSupOrderBot
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice P]
variable {I J : Ideal P}
theorem eq_sup_of_le_sup {x i j : P} (hi : i ∈ I) (hj : j ∈ J) (hx : x ≤ i ⊔ j) :
∃ i' ∈ I, ∃ j' ∈ J, x = i' ⊔ j' := by
refine ⟨x ⊓ i, I.lower inf_le_right hi, x ⊓ j, J.lower inf_le_right hj, ?_⟩
calc
x = x ⊓ (i ⊔ j) := left_eq_inf.mpr hx
_ = x ⊓ i ⊔ x ⊓ j := inf_sup_left _ _ _
theorem coe_sup_eq : ↑(I ⊔ J) = { x | ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, x = i ⊔ j } :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦
⟨fun ⟨_, _, _, _, _⟩ ↦ eq_sup_of_le_sup ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›, fun ⟨i, _, j, _, _⟩ ↦
⟨i, ‹_›, j, ‹_›, le_of_eq ‹_›⟩⟩
end DistribLattice
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra P] {x : P} {I : Ideal P}
theorem IsProper.not_mem_of_compl_mem (hI : IsProper I) (hxc : xᶜ ∈ I) : x ∉ I := by
intro hx
apply hI.top_not_mem
have ht : x ⊔ xᶜ ∈ I := sup_mem ‹_› ‹_›
rwa [sup_compl_eq_top] at ht
theorem IsProper.not_mem_or_compl_not_mem (hI : IsProper I) : x ∉ I ∨ xᶜ ∉ I := by
have h : xᶜ ∈ I → x ∉ I := hI.not_mem_of_compl_mem
tauto
end BooleanAlgebra
end Ideal
/-- For a preorder `P`, `Cofinal P` is the type of subsets of `P`
containing arbitrarily large elements. They are the dense sets in
the topology whose open sets are terminal segments. -/
structure Cofinal (P) [Preorder P] where
/-- The carrier of a `Cofinal` is the underlying set. -/
carrier : Set P
/-- The `Cofinal` contains arbitrarily large elements. -/
isCofinal : IsCofinal carrier
@[deprecated Cofinal.isCofinal (since := "2024-12-02")]
alias Cofinal.mem_gt := Cofinal.isCofinal
namespace Cofinal
variable [Preorder P]
instance : Inhabited (Cofinal P) :=
⟨_, .univ⟩
instance : Membership P (Cofinal P) :=
⟨fun D x ↦ x ∈ D.carrier⟩
variable (D : Cofinal P) (x : P)
/-- A (noncomputable) element of a cofinal set lying above a given element. -/
noncomputable def above : P :=
Classical.choose <| D.isCofinal x
theorem above_mem : D.above x ∈ D :=
(Classical.choose_spec <| D.isCofinal x).1
theorem le_above : x ≤ D.above x :=
(Classical.choose_spec <| D.isCofinal x).2
end Cofinal
section IdealOfCofinals
variable [Preorder P] (p : P) {ι : Type*} [Encodable ι] (𝒟 : ι → Cofinal P)
|
/-- Given a starting point, and a countable family of cofinal sets,
this is an increasing sequence that intersects each cofinal set. -/
| Mathlib/Order/Ideal.lean | 504 | 506 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
/-!
# Cast of integers (additional theorems)
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`),
particularly results involving algebraic homomorphisms or the order structure on `ℤ`
which were not available in the import dependencies of `Data.Int.Cast.Basic`.
## Main declarations
* `castAddHom`: `cast` bundled as an `AddMonoidHom`.
* `castRingHom`: `cast` bundled as a `RingHom`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso OrderedCommMonoid Field
open Additive Function Multiplicative Nat
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Int
/-- Coercion `ℕ → ℤ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def ofNatHom : ℕ →+* ℤ :=
Nat.castRingHom ℤ
section cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ite [IntCast α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (m n : ℤ) :
((ite P m n : ℤ) : α) = ite P (m : α) (n : α) :=
apply_ite _ _ _ _
/-- `coe : ℤ → α` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def castAddHom (α : Type*) [AddGroupWithOne α] : ℤ →+ α where
toFun := Int.cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_add' := cast_add
section AddGroupWithOne
variable [AddGroupWithOne α]
@[simp] lemma coe_castAddHom : ⇑(castAddHom α) = fun x : ℤ => (x : α) := rfl
lemma _root_.Even.intCast {n : ℤ} (h : Even n) : Even (n : α) := h.map (castAddHom α)
variable [CharZero α] {m n : ℤ}
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_zero : (n : α) = 0 ↔ n = 0 where
mp h := by
cases n
· erw [Int.cast_natCast] at h
exact congr_arg _ (Nat.cast_eq_zero.1 h)
· rw [cast_negSucc, neg_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at h
| contradiction
mpr h := by rw [h, cast_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_inj : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← cast_sub, cast_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero]
lemma cast_injective : Injective (Int.cast : ℤ → α) := fun _ _ ↦ cast_inj.1
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Cast/Lemmas.lean | 65 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Quotient
/-!
# Adjoining roots of polynomials
This file defines the commutative ring `AdjoinRoot f`, the ring R[X]/(f) obtained from a
commutative ring `R` and a polynomial `f : R[X]`. If furthermore `R` is a field and `f` is
irreducible, the field structure on `AdjoinRoot f` is constructed.
We suggest stating results on `IsAdjoinRoot` instead of `AdjoinRoot` to achieve higher
generality, since `IsAdjoinRoot` works for all different constructions of `R[α]`
including `AdjoinRoot f = R[X]/(f)` itself.
## Main definitions and results
The main definitions are in the `AdjoinRoot` namespace.
* `mk f : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `of f : R →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `root f : AdjoinRoot f`, the image of X in R[X]/(f).
* `lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : (AdjoinRoot f) →+* S`, the ring
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `i : R →+* S` and sending `X` to `x`.
* `lift_hom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S`, the algebra
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `algebraMap R S` and sending `X` to `x`
* `equiv : (AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[F] E) ≃ {x // x ∈ f.aroots E}` a
bijection between algebra homomorphisms from `AdjoinRoot` and roots of `f` in `S`
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
/-- Adjoin a root of a polynomial `f` to a commutative ring `R`. We define the new ring
as the quotient of `R[X]` by the principal ideal generated by `f`. -/
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
| exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
/-- Ring homomorphism from `R[x]` to `AdjoinRoot f` sending `X` to the `root`. -/
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 84 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,543 | 1,549 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
To avoid this problem, we mark these widely applicable simp lemmas with key discimination tree keys
with `low` priority in order to ensure that they are not tried first.
-/
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f 1 = 1 :=
OneHomClass.map_one f
@[to_additive] lemma map_comp_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f ∘ (1 : ι → M) = 1 := by simp
/-- In principle this could be an instance, but in practice it causes performance issues. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem Subsingleton.of_oneHomClass [Subsingleton M] [OneHomClass F M N] :
Subsingleton F where
allEq f g := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (OneHom M N) := .of_oneHomClass
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_one_iff [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{x : M} :
f x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := hf.eq_iff' (map_one f)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_ne_one_iff {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} : f x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := (map_eq_one_iff f hf).not
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_map {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S]
{f : F} {x : R} (hx : f x ≠ 1) : x ≠ 1 := ne_of_apply_ne f <| (by rwa [(map_one f)])
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OneHomClass F M N` into an actual
`OneHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `OneHom M N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `ZeroHomClass F M N` into an actual
`ZeroHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `ZeroHom M N`."]
def OneHomClass.toOneHom [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : OneHom M N where
toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
/-- Any type satisfying `OneHomClass` can be cast into `OneHom` via `OneHomClass.toOneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `ZeroHomClass` can be cast into `ZeroHom` via
`ZeroHomClass.toZeroHom`. "]
instance [OneHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (OneHom M N) :=
⟨OneHomClass.toOneHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_coe [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) :
((f : OneHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end One
section Mul
variable [Mul M] [Mul N]
/-- `M →ₙ* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve multiplication. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `MulHom` is a non-unital monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →ₙ* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MulHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MulHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
protected map_mul' : ∀ x y, toFun (x * y) = toFun x * toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ* N` denotes the type of multiplication-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ* " => MulHom
/-- `MulHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `MulHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class MulHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
map_mul : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y
@[to_additive]
instance MulHom.funLike : FunLike (M →ₙ* N) M N where
coe := MulHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
/-- `MulHom` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms -/
@[to_additive "`AddHom` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms"]
instance MulHom.mulHomClass : MulHomClass (M →ₙ* N) M N where
map_mul := MulHom.map_mul'
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (x y : M) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
MulHomClass.map_mul f x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (g h : ι → M) : f ∘ (g * h) = f ∘ g * f ∘ h := by
ext; simp
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MulHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddHomClass F M N` into an actual
`AddHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ+ N`."]
def MulHomClass.toMulHom [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulHomClass` can be cast into `MulHom` via `MulHomClass.toMulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddHomClass` can be cast into `AddHom` via
`AddHomClass.toAddHom`."]
instance [MulHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨MulHomClass.toMulHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_coe [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : MulHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end Mul
section mul_one
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
/-- `M →* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `Monoid` structure.
`MonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MonoidHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] extends
OneHom M N, M →ₙ* N
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toOneHom
/-- `M →* N` denotes the type of monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →* " => MonoidHom
/-- `MonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `Monoid`-preserving homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
[FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends MulHomClass F M N, OneHomClass F M N
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instFunLike : FunLike (M →* N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
apply DFunLike.coe_injective'
exact h
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (M →* N) M N where
map_mul := MonoidHom.map_mul'
map_one f := f.toOneHom.map_one'
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (M →* N) := .of_oneHomClass
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MonoidHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` into an
actual `MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →+ N`."]
def MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →* N :=
{ (f : M →ₙ* N), (f : OneHom M N) with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MonoidHomClass` can be cast into `MonoidHom` via
`MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `AddMonoidHom` via
`AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom`."]
instance [MonoidHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →* N) :=
⟨MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_coe [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : M →* N) : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_eq_one [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) :
f a * f b = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul, h, map_one]
variable [FunLike F G H]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (a b : G) : f (a / b) = f a / f b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, hf]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (g h : ι → G) : f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by
ext; simp [map_div' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve negation."]
theorem map_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (a : G) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| map_mul_eq_one f <| inv_mul_cancel _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) :
f ∘ g⁻¹ = (f ∘ g)⁻¹ := by ext; simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a b : G) :
f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹ := by rw [map_mul, map_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g * h⁻¹) = f ∘ g * (f ∘ h)⁻¹ := by simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
∀ a b, f (a / b) = f a / f b := map_div' _ <| map_inv f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by ext; simp
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)]
theorem map_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a : G) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, map_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, map_mul, map_pow f a n]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) (n : ℕ) :
f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, map_pow, zpow_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, hf, map_pow, ← zpow_negSucc]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (g : ι → G) (n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by
ext; simp [map_zpow' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve integer power.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)
"Additive group homomorphisms preserve integer scaling."]
theorem map_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (g : G) (n : ℤ) : f (g ^ n) = f g ^ n := map_zpow' f (map_inv f) g n
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G)
(n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by simp
end mul_one
-- completely uninteresting lemmas about coercion to function, that all homs need
section Coes
/-! Bundled morphisms can be down-cast to weaker bundlings -/
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toOneHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `OneHom`, forgetting the multiplicative property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to a `ZeroHom`, forgetting the additive property"]
instance MonoidHom.coeToOneHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (OneHom M N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toOneHom⟩
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `MulHom`, forgetting the 1-preserving property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to an `AddHom`, forgetting the 0-preserving property."]
instance MonoidHom.coeToMulHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (M →ₙ* N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toMulHom⟩
-- these must come after the coe_toFun definitions
initialize_simps_projections ZeroHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddMonoidHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections OneHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MulHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MonoidHom (toFun → apply)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_mk [One M] [One N] (f : M → N) (h1) : (OneHom.mk f h1 : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.toFun_eq_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_mk [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N) (hmul) : (MulHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.toFun_eq_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_mk [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f hmul) :
(MonoidHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(f.toOneHom : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.toMulHom.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem OneHom.ext [One M] [One N] ⦃f g : OneHom M N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MulHom.ext [Mul M] [Mul N] ⦃f g : M →ₙ* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MonoidHom.ext [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] ⦃f g : M →* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
namespace MonoidHom
variable [Group G]
variable [MulOneClass M]
/-- Makes a group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps -fullyApplied)
"Makes an additive group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves addition."]
def mk' (f : M → G) (map_mul : ∀ a b : M, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : M →* G where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul
map_one' := by rw [← mul_right_cancel_iff, ← map_mul _ 1, one_mul, one_mul]
end MonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.mk_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (h1) : OneHom.mk f h1 = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.mk_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (hmul) : MulHom.mk f hmul = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.mk_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (hmul) :
MonoidHom.mk f hmul = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
end Coes
/-- Copy of a `OneHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of a `ZeroHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def OneHom.copy [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
OneHom M N where
toFun := f'
map_one' := h.symm ▸ f.map_one'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MulHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MulHom.copy [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f'
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ f.map_mul'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddMonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MonoidHom.copy [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : M →* N :=
{ f.toOneHom.copy f' h, f.toMulHom.copy f' h with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_copy {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : (f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.copy_eq {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem OneHom.map_one [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f 1 = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f 0 = 0`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_one [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MulHom.map_mul [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (a b : M) : f (a * b) = f a * f b :=
f.map_mul' a b
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f (a * b) = f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f (a + b) = f a + f b`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_mul [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (a b : M) :
f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
namespace MonoidHom
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a right inverse,
then `f x` has a right inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a right inverse, then `f x` has a right inverse too."]
theorem map_exists_right_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, x * y = 1) : ∃ y, f x * y = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a left inverse,
then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a left inverse, then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see
`IsAddUnit.map`."]
theorem map_exists_left_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, y * x = 1) : ∃ y, y * f x = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
end MonoidHom
/-- The identity map from a type with 1 to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with zero to itself."]
def OneHom.id (M : Type*) [One M] : OneHom M M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
/-- The identity map from a type with multiplication to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with addition to itself."]
def MulHom.id (M : Type*) [Mul M] : M →ₙ* M where
toFun x := x
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
/-- The identity map from a monoid to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from an additive monoid to itself."]
def MonoidHom.id (M : Type*) [MulOneClass M] : M →* M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma OneHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [One M] : (OneHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MulHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [Mul M] : (MulHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MonoidHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] : (MonoidHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
/-- Composition of `OneHom`s as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `ZeroHom`s as a `ZeroHom`."]
def OneHom.comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (hnp : OneHom N P) (hmn : OneHom M N) : OneHom M P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
/-- Composition of `MulHom`s as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `AddHom`s as an `AddHom`."]
def MulHom.comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (hnp : N →ₙ* P) (hmn : M →ₙ* N) : M →ₙ* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_mul' x y := by simp
/-- Composition of monoid morphisms as a monoid morphism. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid morphisms as an additive monoid morphism."]
def MonoidHom.comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (hnp : N →* P) (hmn : M →* N) :
M →* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) : ↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.comp_apply [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_apply [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_apply [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
/-- Composition of monoid homomorphisms is associative. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid homomorphisms is associative."]
theorem OneHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [One M] [One N] [One P] [One Q]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : OneHom N P) (h : OneHom P Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] [Mul Q]
(f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N →ₙ* P) (h : P →ₙ* Q) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
[MulOneClass Q] (f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) (h : P →* Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_right [One M] [One N] [One P] {g₁ g₂ : OneHom N P} {f : OneHom M N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_right [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g₁ g₂ : N →ₙ* P} {f : M →ₙ* N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_right [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g₁ g₂ : N →* P} {f : M →* N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_left [One M] [One N] [One P] {g : OneHom N P} {f₁ f₂ : OneHom M N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← OneHom.comp_apply, h, OneHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_left [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g : N →ₙ* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →ₙ* N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MulHom.comp_apply, h, MulHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_left [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g : N →* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →* N} (hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h, MonoidHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
section
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toOneHom : (M →* N) → OneHom M N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toMulHom : (M →* N) → M →ₙ* N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
end
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.comp_id [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.comp (OneHom.id M) = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.comp_id [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.comp (MulHom.id M) = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_id [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.comp (MonoidHom.id M) = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.id_comp [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : (OneHom.id N).comp f = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.id_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : (MulHom.id N).comp f = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.id_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(MonoidHom.id N).comp f = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_pow [Monoid M] [Monoid N] (f : M →* N) (a : M) (n : ℕ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_pow f a n
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid M] [DivInvMonoid N] (f : M →* N)
(hf : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : M) (n : ℤ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_zpow' f hf a n
/-- Makes a `OneHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `OneHom` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Make a `ZeroHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `ZeroHom`"]
def OneHom.inverse [One M] [One N]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
OneHom N M :=
{ toFun := g,
map_one' := by rw [← f.map_one, h₁] }
/-- Makes a multiplicative inverse from a bijection which preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Makes an additive inverse from a bijection which preserves addition."]
def MulHom.inverse [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : N →ₙ* M where
toFun := g
map_mul' x y :=
calc
g (x * y) = g (f (g x) * f (g y)) := by rw [h₂ x, h₂ y]
_ = g (f (g x * g y)) := by rw [f.map_mul]
_ = g x * g y := h₁ _
/-- If `M` and `N` have multiplications, `f : M →ₙ* N` is a surjective multiplicative map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative. -/
@[to_additive
"If `M` and `N` have additions, `f : M →ₙ+ N` is a surjective additive map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative."]
theorem Function.Surjective.mul_comm [Mul M] [Mul N] {f : M →ₙ* N}
(is_surj : Function.Surjective f) (is_comm : Std.Commutative (· * · : M → M → M)) :
Std.Commutative (· * · : N → N → N) where
comm := fun a b ↦ by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := is_surj a
obtain ⟨b', hb'⟩ := is_surj b
simp only [← ha', ← hb', ← map_mul]
rw [is_comm.comm]
/-- The inverse of a bijective `MonoidHom` is a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The inverse of a bijective `AddMonoidHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def MonoidHom.inverse {A B : Type*} [Monoid A] [Monoid B] (f : A →* B) (g : B → A)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : B →* A :=
{ (f : OneHom A B).inverse g h₁,
(f : A →ₙ* B).inverse g h₁ h₂ with toFun := g }
section End
namespace Monoid
variable (M) [MulOneClass M]
/-- The monoid of endomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "The monoid of endomorphisms.", to_additive_dont_translate]
protected def End := M →* M
namespace End
@[to_additive]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instFunLike
@[to_additive]
instance instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass
@[to_additive instOne]
instance instOne : One (Monoid.End M) where one := .id _
@[to_additive instMul]
instance instMul : Mul (Monoid.End M) where mul := .comp
@[to_additive instMonoid]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (Monoid.End M) where
mul := MonoidHom.comp
one := MonoidHom.id M
mul_assoc _ _ _ := MonoidHom.comp_assoc _ _ _
mul_one := MonoidHom.comp_id
one_mul := MonoidHom.id_comp
npow n f := (npowRec n f).copy f^[n] <| by induction n <;> simp [npowRec, *] <;> rfl
npow_succ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.iterate_succ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.End M) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_pow]
lemma coe_pow (f : Monoid.End M) (n : ℕ) : (↑(f ^ n) : M → M) = f^[n] := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_one]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_mul]
theorem coe_mul (f g) : ((f * g : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = f ∘ g := rfl
end End
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_one := End.coe_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_mul := End.coe_mul
end Monoid
end End
/-- `1` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `0`."]
instance [One M] [One N] : One (OneHom M N) := ⟨⟨fun _ => 1, rfl⟩⟩
/-- `1` is the multiplicative homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the additive homomorphism sending all elements to `0`"]
instance [Mul M] [MulOneClass N] : One (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 1, fun _ _ => (one_mul 1).symm⟩⟩
/-- `1` is the monoid homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "`0` is the additive monoid homomorphism sending all elements to `0`."]
instance [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] : One (M →* N) :=
⟨⟨⟨fun _ => 1, rfl⟩, fun _ _ => (one_mul 1).symm⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.one_apply [One M] [One N] (x : M) : (1 : OneHom M N) x = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.one_apply [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (x : M) : (1 : M →* N) x = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.one_comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (f : OneHom M N) :
(1 : OneHom N P).comp f = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.comp_one [One M] [One N] [One P] (f : OneHom N P) : f.comp (1 : OneHom M N) = 1 := by
ext
simp only [OneHom.map_one, OneHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, OneHom.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
instance [One M] [One N] : Inhabited (OneHom M N) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul M] [MulOneClass N] : Inhabited (M →ₙ* N) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] : Inhabited (M →* N) := ⟨1⟩
namespace MonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (f : M →* N) :
(1 : N →* P).comp f = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_one [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (f : N →* P) :
f.comp (1 : M →* N) = 1 := by
ext
simp only [map_one, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, one_apply]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve negation."]
protected theorem map_inv [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] (f : α →* β) (a : α) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
map_inv f _
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve integer power. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve integer scaling."]
protected theorem map_zpow [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] (f : α →* β) (g : α) (n : ℤ) :
f (g ^ n) = f g ^ n := map_zpow f g n
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
protected theorem map_div [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] (f : α →* β) (g h : α) :
f (g / h) = f g / f h := map_div f g h
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
protected theorem map_mul_inv [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] (f : α →* β) (g h : α) :
f (g * h⁻¹) = f g * (f h)⁻¹ := by simp
end MonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_mul {M F : Type*} [Mul M] [FunLike F M M] [MulHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x y : M) :
f^[n] (x * y) = f^[n] x * f^[n] y :=
Function.Semiconj₂.iterate (map_mul f) n x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_one {M F : Type*} [One M] [FunLike F M M] [OneHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] 1 = 1 :=
iterate_fixed (map_one f) n
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_inv {M F : Type*} [Group M] [FunLike F M M] [MonoidHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : M) :
f^[n] x⁻¹ = (f^[n] x)⁻¹ :=
Commute.iterate_left (map_inv f) n x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_div {M F : Type*} [Group M] [FunLike F M M] [MonoidHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x y : M) :
f^[n] (x / y) = f^[n] x / f^[n] y :=
Semiconj₂.iterate (map_div f) n x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_pow {M F : Type*} [Monoid M] [FunLike F M M] [MonoidHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : M) (k : ℕ) :
f^[n] (x ^ k) = f^[n] x ^ k :=
Commute.iterate_left (map_pow f · k) n x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma iterate_map_zpow {M F : Type*} [Group M] [FunLike F M M] [MonoidHomClass F M M]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) (x : M) (k : ℤ) :
f^[n] (x ^ k) = f^[n] x ^ k :=
Commute.iterate_left (map_zpow f · k) n x
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 1,148 | 1,150 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
open AffineSubspace
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
theorem existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] {ps : Set P} (hnps : ps.Nonempty) {p : P} (hps : ps ⊆ s)
(hp : p ∉ s) (hu : ∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ s ∧ ps ⊆ (cs : Set P)) :
∃! cs₂ : Sphere P,
cs₂.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (s : Set P)) ∧ insert p ps ⊆ (cs₂ : Set P) := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.Nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps)
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩
simp only at hcc hcr hcccru
let x := dist cc (orthogonalProjection s p)
let y := dist p (orthogonalProjection s p)
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonalProjection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y)
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ cc
let cr₂ := √(cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂)
use ⟨cc₂, cr₂⟩
simp -zeta -proj only
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ (orthogonalProjection s p : P) :=
by simp
constructor
· constructor
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc))
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonalProjection_mem _)))
· intro p₁ hp₁
rw [Sphere.mem_coe, mem_sphere, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))]
rcases hp₁ with hp₁ | hp₁
· rw [hp₁]
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [div_div, sub_div', one_mul, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, add_div', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff, ycc₂]
ring
· rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp₁),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc, Subtype.coe_mk,
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp₁ hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hy0, abs_mul_abs_self]
· rintro ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩
simp only at hcc₃ hcr₃
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ, ∃ p0 ∈ s, cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonalProjection s) p)) +ᵥ p0 := by
rwa [mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)] at hcc₃
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p₁ ∈ ps, dist p₁ cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, fun p₁ hp₁ => dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp₁) hcr₃⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃'
obtain ⟨cr₃', hcr₃'⟩ := hcr₃'
have hu := hcccru ⟨cc₃', cr₃'⟩
simp only at hu
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩
-- Porting note: was
-- cases' hu with hucc hucr
-- substs hucc hucr
cases hu
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = √(cr * cr + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)) := by
obtain ⟨p0, hp0⟩ := hnps
have h' : ↑(⟨cc, hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc := rfl
rw [← dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0) hcr₃, hcc₃'', ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp0),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃', h',
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp0 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ |t₃|, ← mul_assoc,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
replace hcr₃ := dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert _ _) hcr₃
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃
rw [show
x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) = x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)
by ring,
add_left_inj] at hcr₃
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y := by field_simp [ycc₂, ← hcr₃, hy0]
subst ht₃
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃''
congr
rw [hcr₃val]
congr 2
field_simp [hy0]
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
theorem _root_.AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq {ι : Type*} [hne : Nonempty ι] [Finite ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent ℝ p) :
∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range p) ∧ Set.range p ⊆ (cs : Set P) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with m hm generalizing ι
· exfalso
have h := Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne
rw [hn] at h
exact lt_irrefl 0 h
· rcases m with - | m
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_one_iff] at hn
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn
haveI : Unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩
use ⟨p i, 0⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton]
constructor
· simp_rw [hi default, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨⟨⟩, by simp only [Metric.sphere_zero, Set.mem_singleton_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨cc, cr⟩
simp only
rintro ⟨rfl, hdist⟩
simp? [Set.singleton_subset_iff] at hdist says
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, Metric.mem_sphere, dist_self] at hdist
rw [hi default, hdist]
· have i := hne.some
let ι2 := { x // x ≠ i }
classical
have hc : Fintype.card ι2 = m + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype {x | x ≠ i}]
· rw [Finset.filter_not]
-- Porting note: removed `simp_rw [eq_comm]` and used `filter_eq'` instead of `filter_eq`
rw [Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _),
Finset.card_sdiff (Finset.subset_univ _), Finset.card_singleton, Finset.card_univ, hn]
simp
· simp
haveI : Nonempty ι2 := Fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
have ha2 : AffineIndependent ℝ fun i2 : ι2 => p i2 := ha.subtype _
replace hm := hm ha2 _ hc
have hr : Set.range p = insert (p i) (Set.range fun i2 : ι2 => p i2) := by
change _ = insert _ (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2)
rw [← Set.image_eq_range, ← Set.image_univ, ← Set.image_insert_eq]
congr with j
simp [Classical.em]
rw [hr, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
refine existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert (Set.range_nonempty _) (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) ?_ hm
convert ha.not_mem_affineSpan_diff i Set.univ
change (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2) = _
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
congr with j
simp
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The circumsphere of a simplex. -/
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
/-- The property satisfied by the circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
/-- The center of the circumsphere is the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The radius of the circumsphere is the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- All points lie in the circumsphere. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.2
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumsphere. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
/-- If there exists a distance that a point has from all vertices of a
simplex, the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace
spanned by that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter := by
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (fun x => dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr
have hr : ∃ (r : ℝ), ∀ (a : P),
a ∈ Set.range (fun (i : Fin (n + 1)) => s.points i) → dist a p = r := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
use r
refine Set.forall_mem_range.mpr ?_
exact hr
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) p] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq (orthogonalProjection_mem p) fun i => hr _ (Set.mem_range_self i)
/-- If a point has the same distance from all vertices of a simplex,
the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace spanned by
that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P} {r : ℝ}
(hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The orthogonal projection of the circumcenter onto a face is the
circumcenter of that face. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : #fs = m + 1) :
↑((s.face h).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) = (s.face h).circumcenter :=
haveI hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r := by
use s.circumradius
simp [face_points]
orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.circumcenter = s₂.circumcenter := by
have hs : s₁.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s₂.points) :=
h ▸ s₁.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have hr : ∀ i, dist (s₂.points i) s₁.circumcenter = s₁.circumradius := by
intro i
have hi : s₂.points i ∈ Set.range s₂.points := Set.mem_range_self _
rw [← h, Set.mem_range] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj⟩
rw [← hj, s₁.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius j]
exact s₂.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hs hr
/-- An index type for the vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter.
This is for use in calculations where it is convenient to work with
affine combinations of vertices together with the circumcenter. (An
equivalent form sometimes used in the literature is placing the
circumcenter at the origin and working with vectors for the vertices.) -/
inductive PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n : ℕ)
| pointIndex : Fin (n + 1) → PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
| circumcenterIndex : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
deriving Fintype
open PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
instance pointsWithCircumcenterIndexInhabited (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n) :=
⟨circumcenterIndex⟩
/-- `pointIndex` as an embedding. -/
def pointIndexEmbedding (n : ℕ) : Fin (n + 1) ↪ PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n :=
⟨fun i => pointIndex i, fun _ _ h => by injection h⟩
/-- The sum of a function over `PointsWithCircumcenterIndex`. -/
theorem sum_pointsWithCircumcenter {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] {n : ℕ}
(f : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → α) :
∑ i, f i = (∑ i : Fin (n + 1), f (pointIndex i)) + f circumcenterIndex := by
classical
have h : univ = insert circumcenterIndex (univ.map (pointIndexEmbedding n)) := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun _ => mem_univ _⟩
obtain i | - := x
· exact mem_insert_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ i))
· exact mem_insert_self _ _
change _ = (∑ i, f (pointIndexEmbedding n i)) + _
rw [add_comm, h, ← sum_map, sum_insert]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, not_exists]
rintro x ⟨_, h⟩
injection h
/-- The vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter. -/
def pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → P
| pointIndex i => s.points i
| circumcenterIndex => s.circumcenter
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to a `pointIndex` value,
equals `points` applied to that value. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_point {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (pointIndex i) = s.points i :=
rfl
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to `circumcenterIndex`, equals the
circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter circumcenterIndex = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The weights for a single vertex of a simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex j => if j = i then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
∑ j, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i j = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ (pointIndex i) (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- A single vertex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
symm
refine
affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _)
(by simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]) ?_
intro i hi hn
cases i
· have h : _ ≠ i := fun h => hn (h ▸ rfl)
simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter, h]
· rfl
/-- The weights for the centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i ∈ fs then (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1, if the `Finset` is nonempty. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))} (h : fs.Nonempty) :
∑ i, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, add_zero, ←
fs.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty ℝ h, ← sum_indicator_subset _ fs.subset_univ]
rcongr
/-- The centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
fs.centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs) := by
simp_rw [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, zero_smul, add_zero, centroidWeights,
← sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero (Function.const (Fin (n + 1)) (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹)
(fun i wi => wi • (s.points i -ᵥ Classical.choice AddTorsor.nonempty)) fs.subset_univ fun _ =>
zero_smul ℝ _,
Set.indicator_apply]
congr
/-- The weights for the circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => 0
| circumcenterIndex => 1
/-- `circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ circumcenterIndex (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
symm
refine affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _) rfl ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ _ hn <;> tauto
/-- The weights for the reflection of the circumcenter in an edge of a
simplex. This definition is only valid with `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -1
/-- `reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_ite,
sum_const, filter_or, filter_eq']
rw [card_union_of_disjoint]
· set_option simprocs false in simp
· simpa only [if_true, mem_univ, disjoint_singleton] using h
/-- The reflection of the circumcenter of a simplex in an edge, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem reflection_circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
reflection (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
have hc : #{i₁, i₂} = 2 := by simp [h]
-- Making the next line a separate definition helps the elaborator:
set W : AffineSubspace ℝ P := affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})
have h_faces :
(orthogonalProjection W s.circumcenter : P) =
↑((s.face hc).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) := by
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_subspace
simp [W]
rw [EuclideanGeometry.reflection_apply, h_faces, s.orthogonalProjection_circumcenter hc,
circumcenter_eq_centroid, s.face_centroid_eq_centroid hc,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
affineCombination_vsub, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, affineCombination_vsub,
weightedVSub_apply, sum_pointsWithCircumcenter]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_smul, add_smul, sub_smul,
centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, ite_smul, zero_smul, sub_zero,
apply_ite₂ (· + ·), add_zero, ← add_smul, hc, zero_sub, neg_smul, sub_self, add_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert sum_const_zero`
rw [← sum_const_zero]
congr
norm_num
end Simplex
end Affine
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Affine AffineSubspace Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is complete,
that contains a set of points, those points are cospherical if and
only if they are equidistant from some point in that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] [s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, hcr⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq h c] at hcr
exact ⟨orthogonalProjection s c, orthogonalProjection_mem _, hcr⟩
· exact fun ⟨c, _, hd⟩ => ⟨c, hd⟩
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is
finite-dimensional, that contains a set of points, those points are
cospherical if and only if they are equidistant from some point in
that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] :
Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius :=
cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete h
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use r
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ r : ℝ, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumradius = r := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumradius. -/
theorem circumradius_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumradius = sx₂.circumradius := by
rcases exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_finiteDimensional h] at hc
rcases hc with ⟨c, hc, r, hcr⟩
use c
intro sx hsxps
have hsx : affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) = s := by
refine
sx.independent.affineSpan_eq_of_le_of_card_eq_finrank_add_one
(affineSpan_le_of_subset_coe (hsxps.trans h)) ?_
simp [hd]
have hc : c ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range sx.points) := hsx.symm ▸ hc
exact
(sx.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hc fun i =>
hcr (sx.points i) (hsxps (Set.mem_range_self i))).symm
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumcenter = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumcenter = sx₂.circumcenter := by
rcases exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P}
(h : ps ⊆ s) [Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction]
(hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_circumradius_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_circumcenter_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc
exact ⟨⟨c, r⟩, fun sx hsx => Sphere.ext (hc sx hsx) (hr sx hsx)⟩
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in an n-dimensional
subspace have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ s.direction] (hd : finrank ℝ s.direction = n)
(hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n} (hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps)
(hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) : sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset h hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- All n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) :
∃ c : Sphere P, ∀ sx : Simplex ℝ P n, Set.range sx.points ⊆ ps → sx.circumsphere = c := by
haveI : Nonempty (⊤ : AffineSubspace ℝ P) := Set.univ.nonempty
rw [← finrank_top, ← direction_top ℝ V P] at hd
refine exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical_subset ?_ hd hc
exact Set.subset_univ _
/-- Two n-simplices among cospherical points in n-space have the same
circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical {ps : Set P} {n : ℕ} [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
(hd : finrank ℝ V = n) (hc : Cospherical ps) {sx₁ sx₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(hsx₁ : Set.range sx₁.points ⊆ ps) (hsx₂ : Set.range sx₂.points ⊆ ps) :
sx₁.circumsphere = sx₂.circumsphere := by
rcases exists_circumsphere_eq_of_cospherical hd hc with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr sx₁ hsx₁, hr sx₂ hsx₂]
/-- Suppose all distances from `p₁` and `p₂` to the points of a
simplex are equal, and that `p₁` and `p₂` lie in the affine span of
`p` with the vertices of that simplex. Then `p₁` and `p₂` are equal
or reflections of each other in the affine span of the vertices of the
simplex. -/
theorem eq_or_eq_reflection_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} {s : Simplex ℝ P n} {p p₁ p₂ : P} {r : ℝ}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points)))
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (Set.range s.points))) (h₁ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₂ : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p₂ = r) :
p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₁ = reflection (affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) p₂ := by
set span_s := affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
have h₁' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₁
have h₂' := s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq h₂
rw [← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan, mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)]
at hp₁ hp₂
obtain ⟨r₁, p₁o, hp₁o, hp₁⟩ := hp₁
obtain ⟨r₂, p₂o, hp₂o, hp₂⟩ := hp₂
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = p₁o := by
subst hp₁
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₁o
rw [h₁'] at hp₁
obtain rfl : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₂) = p₂o := by
subst hp₂
exact s.coe_orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection hp₂o
rw [h₂'] at hp₂
have h : s.points 0 ∈ span_s := mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_range_self _)
have hd₁ :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₁ h₁' h
have hd₂ :
dist p₂ s.circumcenter * dist p₂ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius h₂ h₂' h
rw [← hd₂, hp₁, hp₂, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ s.circumcenter,
vadd_vsub, vadd_vsub, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right, real_inner_smul_right, ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at hd₁
by_cases hp : p = s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p
· rw [Simplex.orthogonalProjectionSpan] at hp
rw [hp₁, hp₂, ← hp]
simp only [true_or, eq_self_iff_true, smul_zero, vsub_self]
· have hz : ⟪p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p, p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection span_s p⟫ ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, inner_self_eq_zero] using hp
rw [mul_left_inj' hz, mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff] at hd₁
rw [hp₁, hp₂]
rcases hd₁ with hd₁ | hd₁
· left
rw [hd₁]
· right
rw [hd₁, reflection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection p r₂ s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan,
neg_smul]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 854 | 860 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem exists₂_comm
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∃ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∃ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@exists_comm (κ₁ _), @exists_comm ι₁]
theorem And.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨h, H⟩ ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq, H⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} (h : b ∨ ∀ x, p x) (x : α) :
b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right fun h₂ ↦ h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ if hq : q then Or.inl hq else
Or.inr fun x ↦ (h x).resolve_left hq, forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_left {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q := by simp [or_comm, Decidable.forall_or_left]
theorem forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_right
theorem Exists.fst {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem Exists.snd {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Prop.exists_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∃ h, p h) ↔ p False ∨ p True :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by_cases (fun H : h₁ ↦ .inr <| by simpa only [H] using h₂)
(fun H ↦ .inl <| by simpa only [H] using h₂), fun h ↦ h.elim (.intro _) (.intro _)⟩
theorem Prop.forall_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∀ h, p h) ↔ p False ∧ p True :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h ↦ by by_cases H : h <;> simpa only [H]⟩
theorem exists_iff_of_forall {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : ∀ h, q h) : (∃ h, q h) ↔ p :=
⟨Exists.fst, fun H ↦ ⟨H, h H⟩⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬p → ¬∃ h' : p, q h' :=
mt Exists.fst
/- See `IsEmpty.exists_iff` for the `False` version of `exists_true_left`. -/
theorem forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 h2)), fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
theorem forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq hp)
lemma imp_congr_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr h₁.to_iff h₂.to_iff)
lemma imp_congr_ctx_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx h₁.to_iff fun hc ↦ (h₂ hc).to_iff)
lemma eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True := propext (iff_true_intro h)
lemma eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False := propext (iff_false_intro h)
-- FIXME: `alias` creates `def Iff.eq := propext` instead of `lemma Iff.eq := propext`
@[nolint defLemma] alias Iff.eq := propext
lemma iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) := propext ⟨propext, Eq.to_iff⟩
-- They were not used in Lean 3 and there are already lemmas with those names in Lean 4
/-- See `IsEmpty.forall_iff` for the `False` version. -/
@[simp] theorem forall_true_left (p : True → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p True.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
end Quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace Classical
-- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open.
/-- Any prop `p` is decidable classically. A shorthand for `Classical.propDecidable`. -/
noncomputable def dec (p : Prop) : Decidable p := by infer_instance
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Any predicate `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decPred (p : α → Prop) : DecidablePred p := by infer_instance
/-- Any relation `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decRel (p : α → α → Prop) : DecidableRel p := by infer_instance
/-- Any type `α` has decidable equality classically. -/
noncomputable def decEq (α : Sort*) : DecidableEq α := by infer_instance
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
noncomputable def existsCases {α C : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h) else H0
theorem some_spec₂ {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃ a, p a} (q : α → Prop)
(hpq : ∀ a, p a → q a) : q (choose h) := hpq _ <| choose_spec _
/-- A version of `byContradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬(α → False)) : α :=
Classical.choice <| (peirce _ False) fun h ↦ (H fun a ↦ h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `Classical.byContradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `Classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬(α → False) → α) : Nonempty α → α :=
fun H ↦ contra H.elim
@[simp] lemma choose_eq (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (· = a) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a := @choose_spec _ (· = a) _
@[simp]
lemma choose_eq' (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (a = ·) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a :=
(@choose_spec _ (a = ·) _).symm
alias axiom_of_choice := axiomOfChoice -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_cases := byCases -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_contradiction := byContradiction -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
-- The remaining theorems in this section were ported from Lean 3,
-- but are currently unused in Mathlib, so have been deprecated.
-- If any are being used downstream, please remove the deprecation.
alias prop_complete := propComplete -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
end Classical
/-- This function has the same type as `Exists.recOn`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `Exists.recOn` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
noncomputable def Exists.classicalRecOn {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a)
{C : Sort*} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section BoundedQuantifiers
variable {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem BEx.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h' => h' a h₁ h₂
theorem BEx.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ (x : _) (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem BAll.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) (h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ <| h₁ _ _
theorem BEx.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) : (∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨_, _, h'⟩ => ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem BAll.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) (h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ <| H _ h
theorem BEx.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ => ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem exists_mem_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ => ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_exists_mem : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ => ⟨x, hq⟩
theorem not_exists_mem : (¬∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬P x h := exists₂_imp
theorem not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not : (∃ x h, ¬P x h) → ¬∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩, al => hp <| al x h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.not_forall₂ [Decidable (∃ x h, ¬P x h)] [∀ x h, Decidable (P x h)] :
(¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
⟨Not.decidable_imp_symm fun nx x h ↦ nx.decidable_imp_symm
fun h' ↦ ⟨x, h, h'⟩, not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not⟩
theorem not_forall₂ : (¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall₂
theorem forall₂_and : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ ∀ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_and) forall_and
theorem forall_and_left [Nonempty α] (q : Prop) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, q ∧ p x) ↔ (q ∧ ∀ x, p x) := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem forall_and_right [Nonempty α] (p : α → Prop) (q : Prop) :
(∀ x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ q := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem exists_mem_or : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ ∃ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (exists_congr fun _ ↦ exists_or) exists_or
theorem forall₂_or_left : (∀ x, p x ∨ q x → r x) ↔ (∀ x, p x → r x) ∧ ∀ x, q x → r x :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ or_imp) forall_and
theorem exists_mem_or_left :
(∃ (x : _) (_ : p x ∨ q x), r x) ↔ (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) ∨ ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x := by
simp only [exists_prop]
exact Iff.trans (exists_congr fun x ↦ or_and_right) exists_or
end BoundedQuantifiers
section ite
variable {α : Sort*} {σ : α → Sort*} {P Q R : Prop} [Decidable P]
{a b c : α} {A : P → α} {B : ¬P → α}
theorem dite_eq_iff : dite P A B = c ↔ (∃ h, A h = c) ∨ ∃ h, B h = c := by
by_cases P <;> simp [*, exists_prop_of_true, exists_prop_of_false]
theorem ite_eq_iff : ite P a b = c ↔ P ∧ a = c ∨ ¬P ∧ b = c :=
dite_eq_iff.trans <| by rw [exists_prop, exists_prop]
theorem eq_ite_iff : a = ite P b c ↔ P ∧ a = b ∨ ¬P ∧ a = c :=
eq_comm.trans <| ite_eq_iff.trans <| (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm).or (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm)
theorem dite_eq_iff' : dite P A B = c ↔ (∀ h, A h = c) ∧ ∀ h, B h = c :=
⟨fun he ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).symm.trans he, fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).symm.trans he⟩, fun he ↦
(em P).elim (fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).trans <| he.1 h) fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).trans <| he.2 h⟩
theorem ite_eq_iff' : ite P a b = c ↔ (P → a = c) ∧ (¬P → b = c) := dite_eq_iff'
theorem dite_ne_left_iff : dite P (fun _ ↦ a) B ≠ a ↔ ∃ h, a ≠ B h := by
rw [Ne, dite_eq_left_iff, not_forall]
exact exists_congr fun h ↦ by rw [ne_comm]
theorem dite_ne_right_iff : (dite P A fun _ ↦ b) ≠ b ↔ ∃ h, A h ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, dite_eq_right_iff, not_forall]
| theorem ite_ne_left_iff : ite P a b ≠ a ↔ ¬P ∧ a ≠ b :=
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 841 | 841 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
| -- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 318 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
| exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 184 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Conditional expectation of real-valued functions
This file proves some results regarding the conditional expectation of real-valued functions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp`: the conditional expectation `μ[f | m]` is equal to the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `fμ` restricted on `m` with respect to `μ` restricted on `m`.
* `MeasureTheory.Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condExp`: the conditional expectation of a function
form a uniformly integrable class.
* `MeasureTheory.condExp_mul_of_stronglyMeasurable_left`: the pull-out property of the conditional
expectation.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp := rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
theorem eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm (f : α → ℝ) : eLpNorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ eLpNorm f 1 μ := by
| by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_integrable hf, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hsig : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hsig, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
calc
eLpNorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ eLpNorm (μ[(|f|)|m]) 1 μ := by
refine eLpNorm_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [condExp_mono hf hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
(condExp_neg ..).symm.le.trans (condExp_mono hf.neg hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => neg_le_abs (f x) : ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂
_ = eLpNorm f 1 μ := by
rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm,
← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp integrable_condExp.2).ne
(hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp hf.2).ne,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_enorm
(stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_enorm hf.1]
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← integral_condExp hm]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[(|f|)|m] := by
rw [← condExp_zero]
exact condExp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 59 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
/-!
# `norm_num` plugins for `Rat.cast` and `⁻¹`.
-/
variable {u : Lean.Level}
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`, if it exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero AddMonoidWithOne"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero division ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
theorem isRat_mkRat : {a na n : ℤ} → {b nb d : ℕ} → IsInt a na → IsNat b nb →
IsRat (na / nb : ℚ) n d → IsRat (mkRat a b) n d
| _, _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨_, h⟩ => by rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_div]; exact ⟨_, h⟩
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
/-- The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `mkRat a b`,
such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`, and returns `a / b`. -/
@[norm_num mkRat _ _]
def evalMkRat : NormNumExt where eval {u α} (e : Q(ℚ)) : MetaM (Result e) := do
let .app (.app (.const ``mkRat _) (a : Q(ℤ))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← whnfR e | failure
haveI' : $e =Q mkRat $a $b := ⟨⟩
let ra ← derive a
let some ⟨_, na, pa⟩ := ra.toInt (q(Int.instRing) : Q(Ring Int)) | failure
let ⟨nb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat q($b) q(AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne)
let rab ← derive q($na / $nb : Rat)
let ⟨q, n, d, p⟩ ← rab.toRat' q(Rat.instDivisionRing)
return .isRat' _ q n d q(isRat_mkRat $pa $pb $p)
theorem isNat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℕ} →
IsNat q n → IsNat (q : R) n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem isInt_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} →
IsInt q n → IsInt (q : R) n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
|
theorem isRat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} → {d : ℕ} →
IsRat q n d → IsRat (q : R) n d
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean | 81 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.GroupRingAction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Invariant
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Defs
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
/-!
# Fixed field under a group action.
This is the basis of the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Given a (finite) group `G` that acts on a field `F`, we define `FixedPoints.subfield G F`,
the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every element of `G`.
This subfield is then normal and separable, and in addition if `G` acts faithfully on `F`
then `finrank (FixedPoints.subfield G F) F = Fintype.card G`.
## Main Definitions
- `FixedPoints.subfield G F`, the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every
element of `G`, where `G` is a group that acts on `F`.
-/
noncomputable section
open MulAction Finset Module
universe u v w
variable {M : Type u} [Monoid M]
variable (G : Type u) [Group G]
variable (F : Type v) [Field F] [MulSemiringAction M F] [MulSemiringAction G F] (m : M)
/-- The subfield of F fixed by the field endomorphism `m`. -/
def FixedBy.subfield : Subfield F where
carrier := fixedBy F m
zero_mem' := smul_zero m
add_mem' hx hy := (smul_add m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
neg_mem' hx := (smul_neg m _).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
one_mem' := smul_one m
mul_mem' hx hy := (smul_mul' m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
inv_mem' x hx := (smul_inv'' m x).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
section InvariantSubfields
variable (M) {F}
/-- A typeclass for subrings invariant under a `MulSemiringAction`. -/
class IsInvariantSubfield (S : Subfield F) : Prop where
smul_mem : ∀ (m : M) {x : F}, x ∈ S → m • x ∈ S
variable (S : Subfield F)
instance IsInvariantSubfield.toMulSemiringAction [IsInvariantSubfield M S] :
MulSemiringAction M S where
smul m x := ⟨m • x.1, IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem m x.2⟩
one_smul s := Subtype.eq <| one_smul M s.1
mul_smul m₁ m₂ s := Subtype.eq <| mul_smul m₁ m₂ s.1
smul_add m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_add m s₁.1 s₂.1
smul_zero m := Subtype.eq <| smul_zero m
smul_one m := Subtype.eq <| smul_one m
smul_mul m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_mul' m s₁.1 s₂.1
instance [IsInvariantSubfield M S] : IsInvariantSubring M S.toSubring where
smul_mem := IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem
end InvariantSubfields
namespace FixedPoints
variable (M)
-- we use `Subfield.copy` so that the underlying set is `fixedPoints M F`
/-- The subfield of fixed points by a monoid action. -/
def subfield : Subfield F :=
Subfield.copy (⨅ m : M, FixedBy.subfield F m) (fixedPoints M F)
(by ext z; simp [fixedPoints, FixedBy.subfield, iInf, Subfield.mem_sInf]; rfl)
instance : IsInvariantSubfield M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) where
smul_mem g x hx g' := by rw [hx, hx]
instance : SMulCommClass M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F where
smul_comm m f f' := show m • (↑f * f') = f * m • f' by rw [smul_mul', f.prop m]
instance smulCommClass' : SMulCommClass (FixedPoints.subfield M F) M F :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul (m : M) (x : FixedPoints.subfield M F) : m • x = x :=
Subtype.eq <| x.2 m
-- Why is this so slow?
@[simp]
theorem smul_polynomial (m : M) (p : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield M F)) : m • p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [Polynomial.smul_C, smul])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [smul_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [smul_mul', Polynomial.smul_C, smul, smul_pow', Polynomial.smul_X]
instance : Algebra (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F := by infer_instance
theorem coe_algebraMap :
algebraMap (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F = Subfield.subtype (FixedPoints.subfield M F) :=
rfl
theorem linearIndependent_smul_of_linearIndependent {s : Finset F} :
(LinearIndepOn (FixedPoints.subfield G F) id (s : Set F)) →
LinearIndepOn F (MulAction.toFun G F) s := by
classical
have : IsEmpty ((∅ : Finset F) : Set F) := by simp
refine Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => linearIndependent_empty_type) fun a s has ih hs => ?_
rw [coe_insert] at hs ⊢
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)] at hs
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)]; refine ⟨ih hs.1, fun ha => ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination] at ha; rcases ha with ⟨l, hl, hla⟩
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply_of_mem_supported F hl] at hla
suffices ∀ i ∈ s, l i ∈ FixedPoints.subfield G F by
replace hla := (sum_apply _ _ fun i => l i • toFun G F i).symm.trans (congr_fun hla 1)
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, toFun_apply, one_smul] at hla
refine hs.2 (hla ▸ Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c hcs => ?_)
change (⟨l c, this c hcs⟩ : FixedPoints.subfield G F) • c ∈ _
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| Submodule.subset_span <| by simpa
intro i his g
refine
eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(linearIndependent_iff'.1 (ih hs.1) s.attach (fun i => g • l i - l i) ?_ ⟨i, his⟩
(mem_attach _ _) :
_)
refine (sum_attach s fun i ↦ (g • l i - l i) • MulAction.toFun G F i).trans ?_
ext g'; dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
rw [sum_apply]
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [Pi.smul_apply, sub_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [sum_sub_distrib, Pi.zero_apply, sub_eq_zero]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext x
rw [toFun_apply, ← mul_inv_cancel_left g g', mul_smul, ← smul_mul', ← toFun_apply _ x]
show
(∑ x ∈ s, g • (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x (g⁻¹ * g')) =
∑ x ∈ s, (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x g'
rw [← smul_sum, ← sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y, ←
sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y]
rw [hla, toFun_apply, toFun_apply, smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype G] (x : F)
/-- `minpoly G F x` is the minimal polynomial of `(x : F)` over `FixedPoints.subfield G F`. -/
def minpoly : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F) :=
(prodXSubSMul G F x).toSubring (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring fun _ hc g =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := Polynomial.mem_coeffs_iff.1 hc
hn.symm ▸ prodXSubSMul.coeff G F x g n
namespace minpoly
theorem monic : (minpoly G F x).Monic := by
simp only [minpoly]
rw [Polynomial.monic_toSubring]
exact prodXSubSMul.monic G F x
theorem eval₂ :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subring.subtype <| (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring) x (minpoly G F x) =
0 := by
rw [← prodXSubSMul.eval G F x, Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp only [minpoly, Polynomial.map_toSubring]
theorem eval₂' :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F) x (minpoly G F x) = 0 :=
eval₂ G F x
|
theorem ne_one : minpoly G F x ≠ (1 : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F)) := fun H =>
have := eval₂ G F x
(one_ne_zero : (1 : F) ≠ 0) <| by rwa [H, Polynomial.eval₂_one] at this
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Fixed.lean | 185 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring
in `n` variables. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'' :
FiniteType R S ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial']
rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
exact ⟨Fintype.card ι, AlgHom.comp f equiv.symm.toAlgHom, by simpa using hsur⟩
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R (Fin n)) f hsur
instance prod [hA : FiniteType R A] [hB : FiniteType R B] : FiniteType R (A × B) :=
⟨by rw [← Subalgebra.prod_top]; exact hA.1.prod hB.1⟩
theorem isNoetherianRing (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] [IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing S := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h.1
apply
isNoetherianRing_of_surjective (MvPolynomial s R) S
(MvPolynomial.aeval (↑) : MvPolynomial s R →ₐ[R] S).toRingHom
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, ← AlgHom.coe_range,
← Algebra.adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]
rfl
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_iff_finiteType (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R S :=
S.fg_top.symm.trans ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.out⟩
end FiniteType
end Algebra
end ModuleAndAlgebra
namespace RingHom
variable {A B C : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
/-- A ring morphism `A →+* B` is of `FiniteType` if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
@[algebraize]
def FiniteType (f : A →+* B) : Prop :=
@Algebra.FiniteType A B _ _ f.toAlgebra
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (A) in
theorem id : FiniteType (RingHom.id A) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.self A
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_surjective hf
{ g with
toFun := g
commutes' := fun a => rfl }
hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →+* B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType := by
rw [← f.comp_id]
exact (id A).comp_surjective hf
theorem comp {g : B →+* C} {f : A →+* B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.trans hf hg
theorem of_finite {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : f.FiniteType :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
alias _root_.RingHom.Finite.to_finiteType := of_finite
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType := by
algebraize [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_restrictScalars_finiteType A B C
end FiniteType
end RingHom
namespace AlgHom
variable {R A B C : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C]
/-- An algebra morphism `A →ₐ[R] B` is of `FiniteType` if it is of finite type as ring morphism.
In other words, if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
def FiniteType (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Prop :=
f.toRingHom.FiniteType
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
RingHom.Finite.finiteType hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (R A)
theorem id : FiniteType (AlgHom.id R A) :=
RingHom.FiniteType.id A
variable {R A}
theorem comp {g : B →ₐ[R] C} {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp hg hf
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.comp_surjective hf hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_surjective f.toRingHom hf
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →ₐ[R] B} {g : B →ₐ[R] C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType :=
RingHom.FiniteType.of_comp_finiteType h
end FiniteType
end AlgHom
theorem algebraMap_finiteType_iff_algebra_finiteType {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] : (algebraMap R A).FiniteType ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R A := by
dsimp [RingHom.FiniteType]
constructor <;> (intro h; convert h; apply Algebra.algebra_ext; exact congrFun rfl)
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
open Algebra AddSubmonoid Submodule
section Span
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- An element of `R[M]` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_adjoin_support (f : R[M]) : f ∈ adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support) := by
suffices span R (of' R M '' f.support) ≤
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of' R M '' f.support)) by
exact this (mem_span_support f)
rw [Submodule.span_le]
exact subset_adjoin
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the set of supports of
elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
refine le_antisymm le_top ?_
rw [← hS, adjoin_le_iff]
intro f hf
have hincl :
of' R M '' f.support ⊆ ⋃ (g : R[M]) (_ : g ∈ S), of' R M '' g.support := by
intro s hs
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨f, ⟨hf, hs⟩⟩
exact adjoin_mono hincl (mem_adjoin_support f)
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `R[M]`, then the image of the union of
the supports of elements of `S` generates `R[M]`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen' {S : Set R[M]} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
suffices (of' R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⋃ f ∈ S, of' R M '' (f.support : Set M) by
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen hS
simp only [Set.image_iUnion]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [AddMonoid M]
/-- If `R[M]` is of finite type, then there is a `G : Finset M` such that its
image generates, as algebra, `R[M]`. -/
theorem exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top [h : FiniteType R R[M]] :
∃ G : Finset M, Algebra.adjoin R (of' R M '' G) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h
letI : DecidableEq M := Classical.decEq M
use Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support
have : (Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support : Set M) = ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M) := by
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen' hS
/-- The image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
`S : Set M` if and only if `m ∈ S`. -/
theorem of'_mem_span [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M} :
of' R M m ∈ span R (of' R M '' S) ↔ m ∈ S := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Submodule.subset_span <| Set.mem_image_of_mem (of R M) h⟩
unfold of' at h
rw [← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported,
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' R)] at h
simpa using h
/--
If the image of an element `m : M` in `R[M]` belongs the submodule generated by
the closure of some `S : Set M` then `m ∈ closure S`. -/
theorem mem_closure_of_mem_span_closure [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M}
(h : of' R M m ∈ span R (Submonoid.closure (of' R M '' S) : Set R[M])) :
m ∈ closure S := by
suffices Multiplicative.ofAdd m ∈ Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S) by
simpa [← toSubmonoid_closure]
let S' := @Submonoid.closure (Multiplicative M) Multiplicative.mulOneClass S
have h' : Submonoid.map (of R M) S' = Submonoid.closure ((fun x : M => (of R M) x) '' S) :=
MonoidHom.map_mclosure _ _
rw [Set.image_congr' (show ∀ x, of' R M x = of R M x from fun x => of'_eq_of x), ← h'] at h
simpa using of'_mem_span.1 h
end Ring
end Span
/-- If a set `S` generates an additive monoid `M`, then the image of `M` generates, as algebra,
`R[M]`. -/
theorem mvPolynomial_aeval_of_surjective_of_closure [AddCommMonoid M] [CommSemiring R] {S : Set M}
(hS : closure S = ⊤) :
Function.Surjective
(MvPolynomial.aeval fun s : S => of' R M ↑s : MvPolynomial S R → R[M]) := by
intro f
induction' f using induction_on with m f g ihf ihg r f ih
· have : m ∈ closure S := hS.symm ▸ mem_top _
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_induction (fun m hm => ?_) ?_ ?_ this
· exact ⟨MvPolynomial.X ⟨m, hm⟩, MvPolynomial.aeval_X _ _⟩
· exact ⟨1, map_one _⟩
· rintro m₁ m₂ _ _ ⟨P₁, hP₁⟩ ⟨P₂, hP₂⟩
exact
⟨P₁ * P₂, by
rw [map_mul, hP₁, hP₂, of_apply, of_apply, of_apply, single_mul_single,
one_mul]; rfl⟩
· rcases ihf with ⟨P, rfl⟩
rcases ihg with ⟨Q, rfl⟩
exact ⟨P + Q, map_add _ _ _⟩
· rcases ih with ⟨P, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r • P, map_smul _ _ _⟩
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- If a set `S` generates an additive monoid `M`, then the image of `M` generates, as algebra,
`R[M]`. -/
theorem freeAlgebra_lift_of_surjective_of_closure [CommSemiring R] {S : Set M}
(hS : closure S = ⊤) :
Function.Surjective
(FreeAlgebra.lift R fun s : S => of' R M ↑s : FreeAlgebra R S → R[M]) := by
intro f
induction' f using induction_on with m f g ihf ihg r f ih
· have : m ∈ closure S := hS.symm ▸ mem_top _
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_induction (fun m hm => ?_) ?_ ?_ this
· exact ⟨FreeAlgebra.ι R ⟨m, hm⟩, FreeAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _⟩
· exact ⟨1, map_one _⟩
· rintro m₁ m₂ _ _ ⟨P₁, hP₁⟩ ⟨P₂, hP₂⟩
exact
⟨P₁ * P₂, by
rw [map_mul, hP₁, hP₂, of_apply, of_apply, of_apply, single_mul_single,
one_mul]; rfl⟩
· rcases ihf with ⟨P, rfl⟩
rcases ihg with ⟨Q, rfl⟩
exact ⟨P + Q, map_add _ _ _⟩
· rcases ih with ⟨P, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r • P, map_smul _ _ _⟩
variable (R M)
/-- If an additive monoid `M` is finitely generated then `R[M]` is of finite
type. -/
instance finiteType_of_fg [CommRing R] [h : AddMonoid.FG M] :
FiniteType R R[M] := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h.fg_top
exact (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R (S : Set M)).of_surjective
(FreeAlgebra.lift R fun s : (S : Set M) => of' R M ↑s)
(freeAlgebra_lift_of_surjective_of_closure hS)
variable {R M}
/-- An additive monoid `M` is finitely generated if and only if `R[M]` is of
finite type. -/
theorem finiteType_iff_fg [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
FiniteType R R[M] ↔ AddMonoid.FG M := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => @AddMonoidAlgebra.finiteType_of_fg _ _ _ _ h⟩
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := @exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top R M _ _ h
refine AddMonoid.fg_def.2 ⟨S, (eq_top_iff' _).2 fun m => ?_⟩
have hm : of' R M m ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of' R M '' ↑S)) := by
simp only [hS, top_toSubmodule, Submodule.mem_top]
rw [adjoin_eq_span] at hm
exact mem_closure_of_mem_span_closure hm
/-- If `R[M]` is of finite type then `M` is finitely generated. -/
theorem fg_of_finiteType [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] [h : FiniteType R R[M]] :
AddMonoid.FG M :=
finiteType_iff_fg.1 h
/-- An additive group `G` is finitely generated if and only if `R[G]` is of
finite type. -/
theorem finiteType_iff_group_fg {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
FiniteType R R[G] ↔ AddGroup.FG G := by
simpa [AddGroup.fg_iff_addMonoid_fg] using finiteType_iff_fg
end AddMonoidAlgebra
namespace MonoidAlgebra
open Algebra Submonoid Submodule
section Span
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Monoid M]
/-- An element of `MonoidAlgebra R M` is in the subalgebra generated by its support. -/
theorem mem_adjoin_support (f : MonoidAlgebra R M) : f ∈ adjoin R (of R M '' f.support) := by
suffices span R (of R M '' f.support) ≤ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (adjoin R (of R M '' f.support)) by
exact this (mem_span_support f)
rw [Submodule.span_le]
exact subset_adjoin
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `MonoidAlgebra R M`, then the set of supports of elements
of `S` generates `MonoidAlgebra R M`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen {S : Set (MonoidAlgebra R M)} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (⋃ f ∈ S, of R M '' (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
refine le_antisymm le_top ?_
rw [← hS, adjoin_le_iff]
intro f hf
-- Porting note: ⋃ notation did not work here. Was
-- ⋃ (g : MonoidAlgebra R M) (H : g ∈ S), (of R M '' g.support)
have hincl : (of R M '' f.support) ⊆
Set.iUnion fun (g : MonoidAlgebra R M)
=> Set.iUnion fun (_ : g ∈ S) => (of R M '' g.support) := by
intro s hs
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨f, ⟨hf, hs⟩⟩
exact adjoin_mono hincl (mem_adjoin_support f)
/-- If a set `S` generates, as algebra, `MonoidAlgebra R M`, then the image of the union of the
supports of elements of `S` generates `MonoidAlgebra R M`. -/
theorem support_gen_of_gen' {S : Set (MonoidAlgebra R M)} (hS : Algebra.adjoin R S = ⊤) :
Algebra.adjoin R (of R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⊤ := by
suffices (of R M '' ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M)) = ⋃ f ∈ S, of R M '' (f.support : Set M) by
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen hS
simp only [Set.image_iUnion]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [Monoid M]
/-- If `MonoidAlgebra R M` is of finite type, then there is a `G : Finset M` such that its image
generates, as algebra, `MonoidAlgebra R M`. -/
theorem exists_finset_adjoin_eq_top [h : FiniteType R (MonoidAlgebra R M)] :
∃ G : Finset M, Algebra.adjoin R (of R M '' G) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS⟩ := h
letI : DecidableEq M := Classical.decEq M
use Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support
have : (Finset.biUnion S fun f => f.support : Set M) = ⋃ f ∈ S, (f.support : Set M) := by
simp only [Finset.set_biUnion_coe, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rw [this]
exact support_gen_of_gen' hS
/-- The image of an element `m : M` in `MonoidAlgebra R M` belongs the submodule generated by
`S : Set M` if and only if `m ∈ S`. -/
theorem of_mem_span_of_iff [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M} :
of R M m ∈ span R (of R M '' S) ↔ m ∈ S := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => Submodule.subset_span <| Set.mem_image_of_mem (of R M) h⟩
dsimp [of] at h
rw [← Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single, Finsupp.mem_supported,
Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' R)] at h
simpa using h
/--
If the image of an element `m : M` in `MonoidAlgebra R M` belongs the submodule generated by the
closure of some `S : Set M` then `m ∈ closure S`. -/
theorem mem_closure_of_mem_span_closure [Nontrivial R] {m : M} {S : Set M}
(h : of R M m ∈ span R (Submonoid.closure (of R M '' S) : Set (MonoidAlgebra R M))) :
m ∈ closure S := by
rw [← MonoidHom.map_mclosure] at h
simpa using of_mem_span_of_iff.1 h
end Ring
end Span
/-- If a set `S` generates a monoid `M`, then the image of `M` generates, as algebra,
`MonoidAlgebra R M`. -/
theorem mvPolynomial_aeval_of_surjective_of_closure [CommMonoid M] [CommSemiring R] {S : Set M}
(hS : closure S = ⊤) :
Function.Surjective
(MvPolynomial.aeval fun s : S => of R M ↑s : MvPolynomial S R → MonoidAlgebra R M) := by
intro f
induction' f using induction_on with m f g ihf ihg r f ih
· have : m ∈ closure S := hS.symm ▸ mem_top _
refine Submonoid.closure_induction (fun m hm => ?_) ?_ ?_ this
· exact ⟨MvPolynomial.X ⟨m, hm⟩, MvPolynomial.aeval_X _ _⟩
· exact ⟨1, map_one _⟩
· rintro m₁ m₂ _ _ ⟨P₁, hP₁⟩ ⟨P₂, hP₂⟩
exact
⟨P₁ * P₂, by
rw [map_mul, hP₁, hP₂, of_apply, of_apply, of_apply, single_mul_single, one_mul]⟩
· rcases ihf with ⟨P, rfl⟩; rcases ihg with ⟨Q, rfl⟩
exact ⟨P + Q, map_add _ _ _⟩
· rcases ih with ⟨P, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r • P, map_smul _ _ _⟩
variable [Monoid M]
/-- If a set `S` generates an additive monoid `M`, then the image of `M` generates, as algebra,
`R[M]`. -/
theorem freeAlgebra_lift_of_surjective_of_closure [CommSemiring R] {S : Set M}
(hS : closure S = ⊤) :
Function.Surjective
(FreeAlgebra.lift R fun s : S => of R M ↑s : FreeAlgebra R S → MonoidAlgebra R M) := by
intro f
induction' f using induction_on with m f g ihf ihg r f ih
· have : m ∈ closure S := hS.symm ▸ mem_top _
refine Submonoid.closure_induction (fun m hm => ?_) ?_ ?_ this
· exact ⟨FreeAlgebra.ι R ⟨m, hm⟩, FreeAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _⟩
· exact ⟨1, map_one _⟩
· rintro m₁ m₂ _ _ ⟨P₁, hP₁⟩ ⟨P₂, hP₂⟩
exact
⟨P₁ * P₂, by
rw [map_mul, hP₁, hP₂, of_apply, of_apply, of_apply, single_mul_single, one_mul]⟩
· rcases ihf with ⟨P, rfl⟩
rcases ihg with ⟨Q, rfl⟩
exact ⟨P + Q, map_add _ _ _⟩
· rcases ih with ⟨P, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r • P, map_smul _ _ _⟩
/-- If a monoid `M` is finitely generated then `MonoidAlgebra R M` is of finite type. -/
instance finiteType_of_fg [CommRing R] [Monoid.FG M] : FiniteType R (MonoidAlgebra R M) :=
(AddMonoidAlgebra.finiteType_of_fg R (Additive M)).equiv (toAdditiveAlgEquiv R M).symm
/-- A monoid `M` is finitely generated if and only if `MonoidAlgebra R M` is of finite type. -/
theorem finiteType_iff_fg [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
FiniteType R (MonoidAlgebra R M) ↔ Monoid.FG M :=
⟨fun h =>
Monoid.fg_iff_add_fg.2 <|
AddMonoidAlgebra.finiteType_iff_fg.1 <| h.equiv <| toAdditiveAlgEquiv R M,
fun h => @MonoidAlgebra.finiteType_of_fg _ _ _ _ h⟩
/-- If `MonoidAlgebra R M` is of finite type then `M` is finitely generated. -/
theorem fg_of_finiteType [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] [h : FiniteType R (MonoidAlgebra R M)] :
Monoid.FG M :=
finiteType_iff_fg.1 h
/-- A group `G` is finitely generated if and only if `R[G]` is of finite type. -/
theorem finiteType_iff_group_fg {G : Type*} [Group G] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
FiniteType R (MonoidAlgebra R G) ↔ Group.FG G := by
simpa [Group.fg_iff_monoid_fg] using finiteType_iff_fg
end MonoidAlgebra
end MonoidAlgebra
section Orzech
open Submodule Module Module.Finite in
/-- Any commutative ring `R` satisfies the `OrzechProperty`, that is, for any finitely generated
`R`-module `M`, any surjective homomorphism `f : N →ₗ[R] M` from a submodule `N` of `M` to `M`
is injective.
This is a consequence of Noetherian case
(`IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_injective`), which requires that `M` is a
| Noetherian module, but allows `R` to be non-commutative. The reduction of this result to
Noetherian case is adapted from <https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1066110>:
suppose `{ m_j }` is a finite set of generator of `M`, for any `n : N` one can write
`i n = ∑ j, b_j * m_j` for `{ b_j }` in `R`, here `i : N →ₗ[R] M` is the standard inclusion.
We can choose `{ n_j }` which are preimages of `{ m_j }` under `f`, and can choose
`{ c_jl }` in `R` such that `i n_j = ∑ l, c_jl * m_l` for each `j`.
Now let `A` be the subring of `R` generated by `{ b_j }` and `{ c_jl }`, then it is
Noetherian. Let `N'` be the `A`-submodule of `N` generated by `n` and `{ n_j }`,
`M'` be the `A`-submodule of `M` generated by `{ m_j }`,
then it's easy to see that `i` and `f` restrict to `N' →ₗ[A] M'`,
and the restricted version of `f` is surjective, hence by Noetherian case,
it is also injective, in particular, if `f n = 0`, then `n = 0`.
See also Orzech's original paper: *Onto endomorphisms are isomorphisms* [orzech1971]. -/
instance (priority := 100) CommRing.orzechProperty
(R : Type*) [CommRing R] : OrzechProperty R := by
refine ⟨fun {M} _ _ _ {N} f hf ↦ ?_⟩
letI := addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup R (M := M)
letI := addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup R (M := N)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 655 | 673 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
| theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 340 | 340 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open Module
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
| InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 277 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Init
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.StacksAttribute
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
/-!
# Categories
Defines a category, as a type class parametrised by the type of objects.
## Notations
Introduces notations in the `CategoryTheory` scope
* `X ⟶ Y` for the morphism spaces (type as `\hom`),
* `𝟙 X` for the identity morphism on `X` (type as `\b1`),
* `f ≫ g` for composition in the 'arrows' convention (type as `\gg`).
Users may like to add `g ⊚ f` for composition in the standard convention, using
```lean
local notation:80 g " ⊚ " f:80 => CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct.comp f g -- type as \oo
```
-/
library_note "CategoryTheory universes"
/--
The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C : Type u`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are independent, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`.
Typically any concrete example will either be a `SmallCategory`, where `v = u`,
which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type u} [SmallCategory C]
```
or a `LargeCategory`, where `u = v+1`, which can be introduced as
```
universe u
variable {C : Type (u+1)} [LargeCategory C]
```
In order for the library to handle these cases uniformly,
we generally work with the unconstrained `Category.{v u}`,
for which objects live in `Type u` and morphisms live in `Type v`.
Because the universe parameter `u` for the objects can be inferred from `C`
when we write `Category C`, while the universe parameter `v` for the morphisms
can not be automatically inferred, through the category theory library
we introduce universe parameters with morphism levels listed first,
as in
```
universe v u
```
or
```
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
```
when multiple independent universes are needed.
This has the effect that we can simply write `Category.{v} C`
(that is, only specifying a single parameter) while `u` will be inferred.
Often, however, it's not even necessary to include the `.{v}`.
(Although it was in earlier versions of Lean.)
If it is omitted a "free" universe will be used.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A preliminary structure on the way to defining a category,
containing the data, but none of the axioms. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
class CategoryStruct (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends Quiver.{v + 1} obj where
/-- The identity morphism on an object. -/
id : ∀ X : obj, Hom X X
/-- Composition of morphisms in a category, written `f ≫ g`. -/
comp : ∀ {X Y Z : obj}, (X ⟶ Y) → (Y ⟶ Z) → (X ⟶ Z)
initialize_simps_projections CategoryStruct (-toQuiver_Hom)
/-- Notation for the identity morphism in a category. -/
scoped notation "𝟙" => CategoryStruct.id -- type as \b1
/-- Notation for composition of morphisms in a category. -/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫ " => CategoryStruct.comp -- type as \gg
/-- Close the main goal with `sorry` if its type contains `sorry`, and fail otherwise. -/
syntax (name := sorryIfSorry) "sorry_if_sorry" : tactic
open Lean Meta Elab.Tactic in
@[tactic sorryIfSorry, inherit_doc sorryIfSorry] def evalSorryIfSorry : Tactic := fun _ => do
let goalType ← getMainTarget
if goalType.hasSorry then
closeMainGoal `sorry_if_sorry (← mkSorry goalType true)
else
throwError "The goal does not contain `sorry`"
/--
`rfl_cat` is a macro for `intros; rfl` which is attempted in `aesop_cat` before
doing the more expensive `aesop` tactic.
This gives a speedup because `simp` (called by `aesop`) is too slow.
There is a fix for this slowness in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7428.
So, when that is resolved, the performance impact of `rfl_cat` should be measured again.
Implementation notes:
* `refine id ?_`:
In some cases it is important that the type of the proof matches the expected type exactly.
e.g. if the goal is `2 = 1 + 1`, the `rfl` tactic will give a proof of type `2 = 2`.
Starting a proof with `refine id ?_` is a trick to make sure that the proof has exactly
the expected type, in this case `2 = 1 + 1`. See also https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/changing.20a.20proof.20can.20break.20a.20later.20proof
* `apply_rfl`:
`rfl` is a macro that attempts both `eq_refl` and `apply_rfl`. Since `apply_rfl`
subsumes `eq_refl`, we can use `apply_rfl` instead. This fails twice as fast as `rfl`.
-/
macro (name := rfl_cat) "rfl_cat" : tactic => do `(tactic| (refine id ?_; intros; apply_rfl))
/--
A thin wrapper for `aesop` which adds the `CategoryTheory` rule set and
allows `aesop` to look through semireducible definitions when calling `intros`.
This tactic fails when it is unable to solve the goal, making it suitable for
use in auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat) "aesop_cat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | rfl_cat |
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
We also use `aesop_cat?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_cat`
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat?) "aesop_cat?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
first | sorry_if_sorry | try_this rfl_cat |
aesop? $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_cat` which does not fail when it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal `aesop` is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_cat_nonterminal) "aesop_cat_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `CategoryTheory):ident]))
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Subsingleton.elim
/-- The typeclass `Category C` describes morphisms associated to objects of type `C`.
The universe levels of the objects and morphisms are unconstrained, and will often need to be
specified explicitly, as `Category.{v} C`. (See also `LargeCategory` and `SmallCategory`.) -/
@[pp_with_univ, stacks 0014]
class Category (obj : Type u) : Type max u (v + 1) extends CategoryStruct.{v} obj where
/-- Identity morphisms are left identities for composition. -/
id_comp : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Identity morphisms are right identities for composition. -/
comp_id : ∀ {X Y : obj} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition in a category is associative. -/
assoc : ∀ {W X Y Z : obj} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z), (f ≫ g) ≫ h = f ≫ g ≫ h := by
aesop_cat
attribute [simp] Category.id_comp Category.comp_id Category.assoc
attribute [trans] CategoryStruct.comp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙 X ≫ f = f := by simp
example {C} [Category C] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : f ≫ 𝟙 Y = f := by simp
/-- A `LargeCategory` has objects in one universe level higher than the universe level of
the morphisms. It is useful for examples such as the category of types, or the category
of groups, etc.
-/
abbrev LargeCategory (C : Type (u + 1)) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
/-- A `SmallCategory` has objects and morphisms in the same universe level.
-/
abbrev SmallCategory (C : Type u) : Type (u + 1) := Category.{u} C
section
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
initialize_simps_projections Category (-Hom)
/-- postcompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem eq_whisker {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : f = g) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ h = g ≫ h := by rw [w]
/-- precompose an equation between morphisms by another morphism -/
theorem whisker_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) {g h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : g = h) : f ≫ g = f ≫ h := by rw [w]
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the right).
If `f g : X ⟶ Y` and `w : f = g` and `h : Y ⟶ Z`, then `w =≫ h : f ≫ h = g ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " =≫ " => eq_whisker
/--
Notation for whiskering an equation by a morphism (on the left).
If `g h : Y ⟶ Z` and `w : g = h` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `f ≫= w : f ≫ g = f ≫ h`.
-/
scoped infixr:80 " ≫= " => whisker_eq
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h = g ≫ h) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq {f g : Y ⟶ Z} (w : ∀ {X : C} (h : X ⟶ Y), h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
f = g := by
convert w (𝟙 Y) <;> simp
theorem eq_of_comp_left_eq' (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(w : (fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => f ≫ h) = fun {Z} (h : Y ⟶ Z) => g ≫ h) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_left_eq @fun Z h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w Z) h
theorem eq_of_comp_right_eq' (f g : Y ⟶ Z)
(w : (fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ f) = fun {X} (h : X ⟶ Y) => h ≫ g) : f = g :=
eq_of_comp_right_eq @fun X h => by convert congr_fun (congr_fun w X) h
theorem id_of_comp_left_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : X ⟶ Y), f ≫ g = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
theorem id_of_comp_right_id (f : X ⟶ X) (w : ∀ {Y : C} (g : Y ⟶ X), g ≫ f = g) : f = 𝟙 X := by
| convert w (𝟙 X)
simp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Category/Basic.lean | 237 | 239 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.IsomorphismClasses
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroObjects
/-!
# Zero morphisms and zero objects
A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. (Notice this is extra
structure, not merely a property.)
A category "has a zero object" if it has an object which is both initial and terminal. Having a
zero object provides zero morphisms, as the unique morphisms factoring through the zero object.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_morphism
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Category
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
variable (D : Type u') [Category.{v'} D]
/-- A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. -/
class HasZeroMorphisms where
/-- Every morphism space has zero -/
[zero : ∀ X Y : C, Zero (X ⟶ Y)]
/-- `f` composed with `0` is `0` -/
comp_zero : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C), f ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = (0 : X ⟶ Z) := by aesop_cat
/-- `0` composed with `f` is `0` -/
zero_comp : ∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z), (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ f = (0 : X ⟶ Z) := by aesop_cat
attribute [instance] HasZeroMorphisms.zero
variable {C}
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {Z : C} :
f ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = (0 : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero f Z
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X : C} {Y Z : C} {f : Y ⟶ Z} :
(0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ f = (0 : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasZeroMorphisms.zero_comp X f
instance hasZeroMorphismsPEmpty : HasZeroMorphisms (Discrete PEmpty) where
zero := by aesop_cat
instance hasZeroMorphismsPUnit : HasZeroMorphisms (Discrete PUnit) where
zero X Y := by repeat (constructor)
namespace HasZeroMorphisms
/-- This lemma will be immediately superseded by `ext`, below. -/
private theorem ext_aux (I J : HasZeroMorphisms C)
(w : ∀ X Y : C, (I.zero X Y).zero = (J.zero X Y).zero) : I = J := by
have : I.zero = J.zero := by
funext X Y
specialize w X Y
apply congrArg Zero.mk w
cases I; cases J
congr
· apply proof_irrel_heq
· apply proof_irrel_heq
/-- If you're tempted to use this lemma "in the wild", you should probably
carefully consider whether you've made a mistake in allowing two
instances of `HasZeroMorphisms` to exist at all.
See, particularly, the note on `zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` below.
-/
theorem ext (I J : HasZeroMorphisms C) : I = J := by
apply ext_aux
intro X Y
have : (I.zero X Y).zero ≫ (J.zero Y Y).zero = (I.zero X Y).zero := by
apply I.zero_comp X (J.zero Y Y).zero
have that : (I.zero X Y).zero ≫ (J.zero Y Y).zero = (J.zero X Y).zero := by
apply J.comp_zero (I.zero X Y).zero Y
rw [← this, ← that]
instance : Subsingleton (HasZeroMorphisms C) :=
⟨ext⟩
end HasZeroMorphisms
open Opposite HasZeroMorphisms
instance hasZeroMorphismsOpposite [HasZeroMorphisms C] : HasZeroMorphisms Cᵒᵖ where
zero X Y := ⟨(0 : unop Y ⟶ unop X).op⟩
comp_zero f Z := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op (HasZeroMorphisms.zero_comp (unop Z) f.unop)
zero_comp X {Y Z} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :=
congrArg Quiver.Hom.op (HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero f.unop (unop X))
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
@[simp] lemma op_zero (X Y : C) : (0 : X ⟶ Y).op = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_zero (X Y : Cᵒᵖ) : (0 : X ⟶ Y).unop = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_of_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← zero_comp, cancel_mono] at h
exact h
theorem zero_of_epi_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g : Y ⟶ Z} [Epi f] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : g = 0 := by
rw [← comp_zero, cancel_epi] at h
exact h
theorem eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] (w : image.ι f = 0) :
f = 0 := by rw [← image.fac f, w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem nonzero_image_of_nonzero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] (w : f ≠ 0) : image.ι f ≠ 0 :=
fun h => w (eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero h)
end
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms D]
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (C ⥤ D) where
zero F G := ⟨{ app := fun _ => 0 }⟩
comp_zero := fun η H => by
ext X; dsimp; apply comp_zero
zero_comp := fun F {G H} η => by
ext X; dsimp; apply zero_comp
@[simp]
theorem zero_app (F G : C ⥤ D) (j : C) : (0 : F ⟶ G).app j = 0 := rfl
end
namespace IsZero
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
theorem eq_zero_of_src {X Y : C} (o : IsZero X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : f = 0 :=
o.eq_of_src _ _
theorem eq_zero_of_tgt {X Y : C} (o : IsZero Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : f = 0 :=
o.eq_of_tgt _ _
theorem iff_id_eq_zero (X : C) : IsZero X ↔ 𝟙 X = 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_of_src _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun Y => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => by
rw [← id_comp f, ← id_comp (0 : X ⟶ Y), h, zero_comp, zero_comp]; simp only⟩⟩,
fun Y => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => by
rw [← comp_id f, ← comp_id (0 : Y ⟶ X), h, comp_zero, comp_zero]; simp only ⟩⟩⟩⟩
theorem of_mono_zero (X Y : C) [Mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)] : IsZero X :=
(iff_id_eq_zero X).mpr ((cancel_mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)).1 (by simp))
theorem of_epi_zero (X Y : C) [Epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)] : IsZero Y :=
(iff_id_eq_zero Y).mpr ((cancel_epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)).1 (by simp))
theorem of_mono_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] (h : f = 0) : IsZero X := by
subst h
apply of_mono_zero X Y
theorem of_epi_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] (h : f = 0) : IsZero Y := by
subst h
apply of_epi_zero X Y
theorem iff_isSplitMono_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsSplitMono f] : IsZero X ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [iff_id_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Category.id_comp f, h, zero_comp]
· intro h
rw [← IsSplitMono.id f]
simp only [h, zero_comp]
theorem iff_isSplitEpi_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsSplitEpi f] : IsZero Y ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [iff_id_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Category.comp_id f, h, comp_zero]
· intro h
rw [← IsSplitEpi.id f]
simp [h]
theorem of_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] (i : IsZero Y) : IsZero X := by
have hf := i.eq_zero_of_tgt f
subst hf
exact IsZero.of_mono_zero X Y
theorem of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] (i : IsZero X) : IsZero Y := by
have hf := i.eq_zero_of_src f
subst hf
exact IsZero.of_epi_zero X Y
end IsZero
/-- A category with a zero object has zero morphisms.
It is rarely a good idea to use this. Many categories that have a zero object have zero
morphisms for some other reason, for example from additivity. Library code that uses
`zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` will then be incompatible with these categories because
the `HasZeroMorphisms` instances will not be definitionally equal. For this reason library
code should generally ask for an instance of `HasZeroMorphisms` separately, even if it already
asks for an instance of `HasZeroObjects`. -/
def IsZero.hasZeroMorphisms {O : C} (hO : IsZero O) : HasZeroMorphisms C where
zero X Y := { zero := hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Y }
zero_comp X {Y Z} f := by
change (hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Y) ≫ f = hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Z
rw [Category.assoc]
congr
apply hO.eq_of_src
comp_zero {X Y} f Z := by
change f ≫ (hO.from_ Y ≫ hO.to_ Z) = hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Z
rw [← Category.assoc]
congr
apply hO.eq_of_tgt
namespace HasZeroObject
variable [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
/-- A category with a zero object has zero morphisms.
It is rarely a good idea to use this. Many categories that have a zero object have zero
morphisms for some other reason, for example from additivity. Library code that uses
`zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` will then be incompatible with these categories because
the `has_zero_morphisms` instances will not be definitionally equal. For this reason library
code should generally ask for an instance of `HasZeroMorphisms` separately, even if it already
asks for an instance of `HasZeroObjects`. -/
def zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject : HasZeroMorphisms C where
zero X _ := { zero := (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default }
zero_comp X {Y Z} f := by
change ((default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default) ≫ f = (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default
rw [Category.assoc]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
comp_zero {X Y} f Z := by
change f ≫ (default : Y ⟶ 0) ≫ default = (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default
rw [← Category.assoc]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsInitial_hom {X : C} (t : IsInitial X) : (zeroIsoIsInitial t).hom = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsInitial_inv {X : C} (t : IsInitial X) : (zeroIsoIsInitial t).inv = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsTerminal_hom {X : C} (t : IsTerminal X) : (zeroIsoIsTerminal t).hom = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsTerminal_inv {X : C} (t : IsTerminal X) : (zeroIsoIsTerminal t).inv = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoInitial_hom [HasInitial C] : zeroIsoInitial.hom = (0 : 0 ⟶ ⊥_ C) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoInitial_inv [HasInitial C] : zeroIsoInitial.inv = (0 : ⊥_ C ⟶ 0) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoTerminal_hom [HasTerminal C] : zeroIsoTerminal.hom = (0 : 0 ⟶ ⊤_ C) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoTerminal_inv [HasTerminal C] : zeroIsoTerminal.inv = (0 : ⊤_ C ⟶ 0) := by ext
end HasZeroMorphisms
open ZeroObject
instance {B : Type*} [Category B] : HasZeroObject (B ⥤ C) :=
(((CategoryTheory.Functor.const B).obj (0 : C)).isZero fun _ => isZero_zero _).hasZeroObject
end HasZeroObject
open ZeroObject
variable {D}
@[simp]
theorem IsZero.map [HasZeroObject D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] {F : C ⥤ D} (hF : IsZero F) {X Y : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) : F.map f = 0 :=
(hF.obj _).eq_of_src _ _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CategoryTheory.Functor.zero_obj [HasZeroObject D] (X : C) :
IsZero ((0 : C ⥤ D).obj X) :=
(isZero_zero _).obj _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CategoryTheory.zero_map [HasZeroObject D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] {X Y : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (0 : C ⥤ D).map f = 0 :=
(isZero_zero _).map _
section
variable [HasZeroObject C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
open ZeroObject
@[simp]
theorem id_zero : 𝟙 (0 : C) = (0 : (0 : C) ⟶ 0) := by apply HasZeroObject.from_zero_ext
-- This can't be a `simp` lemma because the left hand side would be a metavariable.
/-- An arrow ending in the zero object is zero -/
theorem zero_of_to_zero {X : C} (f : X ⟶ 0) : f = 0 := by ext
theorem zero_of_target_iso_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : Y ≅ 0) : f = 0 := by
have h : f = f ≫ i.hom ≫ 𝟙 0 ≫ i.inv := by simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id, id_comp, comp_id]
simpa using h
/-- An arrow starting at the zero object is zero -/
theorem zero_of_from_zero {X : C} (f : 0 ⟶ X) : f = 0 := by ext
theorem zero_of_source_iso_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : X ≅ 0) : f = 0 := by
have h : f = i.hom ≫ 𝟙 0 ≫ i.inv ≫ f := by simp only [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, id_comp, comp_id]
simpa using h
theorem zero_of_source_iso_zero' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : IsIsomorphic X 0) : f = 0 :=
zero_of_source_iso_zero f (Nonempty.some i)
theorem zero_of_target_iso_zero' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : IsIsomorphic Y 0) : f = 0 :=
zero_of_target_iso_zero f (Nonempty.some i)
theorem mono_of_source_iso_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : X ≅ 0) : Mono f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h _ => by rw [zero_of_target_iso_zero g i, zero_of_target_iso_zero h i]⟩
theorem epi_of_target_iso_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : Y ≅ 0) : Epi f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h _ => by rw [zero_of_source_iso_zero g i, zero_of_source_iso_zero h i]⟩
/-- An object `X` has `𝟙 X = 0` if and only if it is isomorphic to the zero object.
Because `X ≅ 0` contains data (even if a subsingleton), we express this `↔` as an `≃`.
-/
def idZeroEquivIsoZero (X : C) : 𝟙 X = 0 ≃ (X ≅ 0) where
toFun h :=
{ hom := 0
inv := 0 }
invFun i := zero_of_target_iso_zero (𝟙 X) i
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem idZeroEquivIsoZero_apply_hom (X : C) (h : 𝟙 X = 0) : ((idZeroEquivIsoZero X) h).hom = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem idZeroEquivIsoZero_apply_inv (X : C) (h : 𝟙 X = 0) : ((idZeroEquivIsoZero X) h).inv = 0 :=
rfl
/-- If `0 : X ⟶ Y` is a monomorphism, then `X ≅ 0`. -/
@[simps]
def isoZeroOfMonoZero {X Y : C} (_ : Mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)) : X ≅ 0 where
hom := 0
inv := 0
hom_inv_id := (cancel_mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)).mp (by simp)
/-- If `0 : X ⟶ Y` is an epimorphism, then `Y ≅ 0`. -/
@[simps]
def isoZeroOfEpiZero {X Y : C} (_ : Epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)) : Y ≅ 0 where
hom := 0
inv := 0
| hom_inv_id := (cancel_epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)).mp (by simp)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ZeroMorphisms.lean | 387 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.FreimanHom
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Scalar
/-!
# Sets without arithmetic progressions of length three and Roth numbers
This file defines sets without arithmetic progressions of length three, aka 3AP-free sets, and the
Roth number of a set.
The corresponding notion, sets without geometric progressions of length three, are called 3GP-free
sets.
The Roth number of a finset is the size of its biggest 3AP-free subset. This is a more general
definition than the one often found in mathematical literature, where the `n`-th Roth number is
the size of the biggest 3AP-free subset of `{0, ..., n - 1}`.
## Main declarations
* `ThreeGPFree`: Predicate for a set to be 3GP-free.
* `ThreeAPFree`: Predicate for a set to be 3AP-free.
* `mulRothNumber`: The multiplicative Roth number of a finset.
* `addRothNumber`: The additive Roth number of a finset.
* `rothNumberNat`: The Roth number of a natural, namely `addRothNumber (Finset.range n)`.
## TODO
* Can `threeAPFree_iff_eq_right` be made more general?
* Generalize `ThreeGPFree.image` to Freiman homs
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Roth, arithmetic progression, average, three-free
-/
assert_not_exists Field Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
open Finset Function
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β : Type*}
section ThreeAPFree
open Set
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] (s t : Set α)
/-- A set is **3GP-free** if it does not contain any non-trivial geometric progression of length
three. -/
@[to_additive "A set is **3AP-free** if it does not contain any non-trivial arithmetic progression
of length three.
This is also sometimes called a **non averaging set** or **Salem-Spencer set**."]
def ThreeGPFree : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b
/-- Whether a given finset is 3GP-free is decidable. -/
@[to_additive "Whether a given finset is 3AP-free is decidable."]
instance ThreeGPFree.instDecidable [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} :
Decidable (ThreeGPFree (s : Set α)) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ s, a * c = b * b → a = b) Iff.rfl
variable {s t}
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree t :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc ↦ hs (h ha) (h hb) (h hc)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem threeGPFree_empty : ThreeGPFree (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ ha => ha.elim
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Subsingleton.threeGPFree (hs : s.Subsingleton) : ThreeGPFree s :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ _ _ ↦ hs ha hb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem threeGPFree_singleton (a : α) : ThreeGPFree ({a} : Set α) :=
subsingleton_singleton.threeGPFree
@[to_additive ThreeAPFree.prod]
theorem ThreeGPFree.prod {t : Set β} (hs : ThreeGPFree s) (ht : ThreeGPFree t) :
ThreeGPFree (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ ha _ hb _ hc h ↦
Prod.ext (hs ha.1 hb.1 hc.1 (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1) (ht ha.2 hb.2 hc.2 (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).2)
@[to_additive]
theorem threeGPFree_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(hs : ∀ i, ThreeGPFree (s i)) : ThreeGPFree ((univ : Set ι).pi s) :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc h ↦
funext fun i => hs i (ha i trivial) (hb i trivial) (hc i trivial) <| congr_fun h i
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] {s A : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma ThreeGPFree.of_image (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 s t f) (hf' : s.InjOn f) (hAs : A ⊆ s)
(hA : ThreeGPFree (f '' A)) : ThreeGPFree A :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc habc ↦ hf' (hAs ha) (hAs hb) <| hA (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(mem_image_of_mem _ hb) (mem_image_of_mem _ hc) <|
hf.mul_eq_mul (hAs ha) (hAs hc) (hAs hb) (hAs hb) habc
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma threeGPFree_image (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 s t f) (hAs : A ⊆ s) :
ThreeGPFree (f '' A) ↔ ThreeGPFree A := by
rw [ThreeGPFree, ThreeGPFree]
have := (hf.bijOn.injOn.mono hAs).bijOn_image (f := f)
simp +contextual only
[((hf.bijOn.injOn.mono hAs).bijOn_image (f := f)).forall,
hf.mul_eq_mul (hAs _) (hAs _) (hAs _) (hAs _), this.injOn.eq_iff]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨_, ThreeGPFree.image⟩ := threeGPFree_image
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.threeGPFree (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 s t f) (hf' : s.InjOn f)
(ht : ThreeGPFree t) : ThreeGPFree s :=
(ht.mono hf.mapsTo.image_subset).of_image hf hf' subset_rfl
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.threeGPFree_congr (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 s t f) :
ThreeGPFree s ↔ ThreeGPFree t := by
rw [← threeGPFree_image hf subset_rfl, hf.bijOn.image_eq]
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are preserved under semigroup homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are preserved under semigroup homomorphisms."]
theorem ThreeGPFree.image' [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β] (f : F) (hf : (s * s).InjOn f)
(h : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ habc
rw [h ha hb hc (hf (mul_mem_mul ha hc) (mul_mem_mul hb hb) <| by rwa [map_mul, map_mul])]
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [IsCancelMul α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive] lemma ThreeGPFree.eq_right (hs : ThreeGPFree s) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → b = c := by
rintro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl := hs ha hb hc habc
simpa using habc.symm
@[to_additive] lemma threeGPFree_insert :
ThreeGPFree (insert a s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s ∧
(∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b) ∧
∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → b * c = a * a → b = a := by
refine ⟨fun hs ↦ ⟨hs.mono (subset_insert _ _),
fun b hb c hc ↦ hs (Or.inl rfl) (Or.inr hb) (Or.inr hc),
fun b hb c hc ↦ hs (Or.inr hb) (Or.inl rfl) (Or.inr hc)⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ha, ha'⟩ b hb c hc d hd h
rw [mem_insert_iff] at hb hc hd
obtain rfl | hb := hb <;> obtain rfl | hc := hc
· rfl
all_goals obtain rfl | hd := hd
· exact (ha' hc hc h.symm).symm
· exact ha hc hd h
· exact mul_right_cancel h
· exact ha' hb hd h
· obtain rfl := ha hc hb ((mul_comm _ _).trans h)
exact ha' hb hc h
· exact hs hb hc hd h
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.smul_set (hs : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩ h
exact congr_arg (a • ·) <| hs hb hc hd <| by simpa [mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ a] using h
@[to_additive] lemma threeGPFree_smul_set : ThreeGPFree (a • s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s where
mp hs b hb c hc d hd h := mul_left_cancel
(hs (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) (mem_image_of_mem _ hc) (mem_image_of_mem _ hd) <| by
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_mul_mul_comm, h])
mpr := ThreeGPFree.smul_set
end CancelCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem threeGPFree_insert_of_lt (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, i < a) :
ThreeGPFree (insert a s) ↔
ThreeGPFree s ∧ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b := by
refine threeGPFree_insert.trans ?_
rw [← and_assoc]
exact and_iff_left fun b hb c hc h => ((mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hs _ hb) (hs _ hc)).ne h).elim
end OrderedCancelCommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NoZeroDivisors α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
| lemma ThreeGPFree.smul_set₀ (hs : ThreeGPFree s) (ha : a ≠ 0) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩ h
exact congr_arg (a • ·) <| hs hb hc hd <| by simpa [mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ a, ha] using h
theorem threeGPFree_smul_set₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s :=
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Defs.lean | 216 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.SnakeLemma
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.ShortExact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplexLimits
/-!
# The homology sequence
If `0 ⟶ X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ 0` is a short exact sequence in a category of complexes
`HomologicalComplex C c` in an abelian category (i.e. `S` is a short complex in
that category and satisfies `hS : S.ShortExact`), then whenever `i` and `j` are degrees
such that `hij : c.Rel i j`, then there is a long exact sequence :
`... ⟶ S.X₁.homology i ⟶ S.X₂.homology i ⟶ S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j ⟶ ...`.
The connecting homomorphism `S.X₃.homology i ⟶ S.X₁.homology j` is `hS.δ i j hij`, and
the exactness is asserted as lemmas `hS.homology_exact₁`, `hS.homology_exact₂` and
`hS.homology_exact₃`.
The proof is based on the snake lemma, similarly as it was originally done in
the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
## References
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0111
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
(K L : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (i j : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology j]
/-- The morphism `K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j` that is induced by `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesToCycles [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
K.liftCycles (K.fromOpcycles i j) _ rfl (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_iCycles : K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.fromOpcycles i j := by
dsimp only [opcyclesToCycles]
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.d i j := by
simp [opcyclesToCycles]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j = K.toCycles i j := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), assoc, opcyclesToCycles_iCycles,
p_fromOpcycles, toCycles_i]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_opcyclesToCycles :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.opcyclesToCycles i j = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), assoc, opcyclesToCycles_iCycles,
homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_homologyπ :
K.opcyclesToCycles i j ≫ K.homologyπ j = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i),
pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_assoc, toCycles_comp_homologyπ, comp_zero]
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesToCycles_naturality :
opcyclesMap φ i ≫ opcyclesToCycles L i j = opcyclesToCycles K i j ≫ cyclesMap φ j := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (L.iCycles j), ← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i),
assoc, p_opcyclesMap_assoc, pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles, Hom.comm, cyclesMap_i,
pOpcycles_opcyclesToCycles_iCycles_assoc]
variable (C c)
/-- The natural transformation `K.opcyclesToCycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j` for all
`K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransOpCyclesToCycles [CategoryWithHomology C] :
opcyclesFunctor C c i ⟶ cyclesFunctor C c j where
app K := K.opcyclesToCycles i j
end HasZeroMorphisms
section Preadditive
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
(K : HomologicalComplex C c) (i j : ι) (hij : c.Rel i j)
namespace HomologySequence
/-- The diagram `K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def composableArrows₃ [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
ComposableArrows C 3 :=
ComposableArrows.mk₃ (K.homologyι i) (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j)
instance [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
Mono ((composableArrows₃ K i j).map' 0 1) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11
We turn off simprocs here.
Ideally someone will investigate whether `simp` lemmas can be rearranged
so that this works without the `set_option`,
*or* come up with a proposal regarding finer control of disabling simprocs. -/
set_option simprocs false in
instance [K.HasHomology i] [K.HasHomology j] :
Epi ((composableArrows₃ K i j).map' 2 3) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
| include hij in
/-- The diagram `K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i ⟶ K.cycles j ⟶ K.homology j` is exact
when `c.Rel i j`. -/
lemma composableArrows₃_exact [CategoryWithHomology C] :
(composableArrows₃ K i j).Exact := by
let S := ShortComplex.mk (K.homologyι i) (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (by simp)
let S' := ShortComplex.mk (K.homologyι i) (K.fromOpcycles i j) (by simp)
let ι : S ⟶ S' :=
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := K.iCycles j }
have hS : S.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono ι]
exact S'.exact_of_f_is_kernel (K.homologyIsKernel i j (c.next_eq' hij))
let T := ShortComplex.mk (K.opcyclesToCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j) (by simp)
let T' := ShortComplex.mk (K.toCycles i j) (K.homologyπ j) (by simp)
let π : T' ⟶ T :=
{ τ₁ := K.pOpcycles i
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
have hT : T.Exact := by
rw [← ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono π]
exact T'.exact_of_g_is_cokernel (K.homologyIsCokernel i j (c.prev_eq' hij))
apply ComposableArrows.exact_of_δ₀
· exact hS.exact_toComposableArrows
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologySequence.lean | 124 | 148 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ker
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Pi
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Basic
/-!
# The cofinite filter
In this file we define
`Filter.cofinite`: the filter of sets with finite complement
and prove its basic properties. In particular, we prove that for `ℕ` it is equal to `Filter.atTop`.
## TODO
Define filters for other cardinalities of the complement.
-/
open Set Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {l : Filter α}
namespace Filter
/-- The cofinite filter is the filter of subsets whose complements are finite. -/
def cofinite : Filter α :=
comk Set.Finite finite_empty (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ ht.subset hsub) fun _ h _ ↦ h.union
@[simp]
theorem mem_cofinite {s : Set α} : s ∈ @cofinite α ↔ sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ { x | ¬p x }.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasBasis_cofinite : HasBasis cofinite (fun s : Set α => s.Finite) compl :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨fun h => ⟨sᶜ, h, (compl_compl s).subset⟩, fun ⟨_t, htf, hts⟩ =>
htf.subset <| compl_subset_comm.2 hts⟩⟩
instance cofinite_neBot [Infinite α] : NeBot (@cofinite α) :=
hasBasis_cofinite.neBot_iff.2 fun hs => hs.infinite_compl.nonempty
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot_iff : @cofinite α = ⊥ ↔ Finite α := by
simp [← empty_mem_iff_bot, finite_univ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot [Finite α] : @cofinite α = ⊥ := cofinite_eq_bot_iff.2 ‹_›
theorem frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ Set.Infinite { x | p x } := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_cofinite, not_not, Set.Infinite]
lemma frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s) ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.frequently_cofinite⟩ := frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
@[simp]
lemma cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_mem_iff_neBot.symm.trans frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.cofinite_inf_principal_neBot⟩ := cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.compl_mem_cofinite {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : sᶜ ∈ @cofinite α :=
mem_cofinite.2 <| (compl_compl s).symm ▸ hs
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_cofinite_nmem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
hs.compl_mem_cofinite
theorem _root_.Finset.eventually_cofinite_nmem (s : Finset α) : ∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
s.finite_toSet.eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_frequently_cofinite {s : Set α} :
Set.Infinite s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite.symm
theorem eventually_cofinite_ne (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in cofinite, a ≠ x :=
(Set.finite_singleton x).eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, {x}ᶜ ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h x => h (finite_singleton x).compl_mem_cofinite, fun h s (hs : sᶜ.Finite) => ?_⟩
rw [← compl_compl s, ← biUnion_of_singleton sᶜ, compl_iUnion₂, Filter.biInter_mem hs]
exact fun x _ => h x
theorem le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ y in l, y ≠ x :=
le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no top element, then `atTop ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atTop_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] : (atTop : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atTop
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no bottom element, then `atBot ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atBot_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] : (atBot : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atBot
theorem comap_cofinite_le (f : α → β) : comap f cofinite ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr fun x =>
mem_comap.2 ⟨{f x}ᶜ, (finite_singleton _).compl_mem_cofinite, fun _ => ne_of_apply_ne f⟩
/-- The coproduct of the cofinite filters on two types is the cofinite filter on their product. -/
theorem coprod_cofinite : (cofinite : Filter α).coprod (cofinite : Filter β) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprod, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff]
theorem coprodᵢ_cofinite {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] :
(Filter.coprodᵢ fun i => (cofinite : Filter (α i))) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprodᵢ, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, forall_finite_image_eval_iff]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_left : Disjoint cofinite l ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s := by
simp [l.basis_sets.disjoint_iff_right]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_right : Disjoint l cofinite ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_cofinite_left
/-- If `l ≥ Filter.cofinite` is a countably generated filter, then `l.ker` is cocountable. -/
theorem countable_compl_ker [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : cofinite ≤ l) : Set.Countable l.kerᶜ := by
rcases exists_antitone_basis l with ⟨s, hs⟩
simp only [hs.ker, iInter_true, compl_iInter]
exact countable_iUnion fun n ↦ Set.Finite.countable <| h <| hs.mem _
/-- If `f` tends to a countably generated filter `l` along `Filter.cofinite`,
then for all but countably many elements, `f x ∈ l.ker`. -/
theorem Tendsto.countable_compl_preimage_ker {f : α → β}
{l : Filter β} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : Tendsto f cofinite l) :
Set.Countable (f ⁻¹' l.ker)ᶜ := by rw [← ker_comap]; exact countable_compl_ker h.le_comap
/-- Given a collection of filters `l i : Filter (α i)` and sets `s i ∈ l i`,
if all but finitely many of `s i` are the whole space,
then their indexed product `Set.pi Set.univ s` belongs to the filter `Filter.pi l`. -/
theorem univ_pi_mem_pi {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)}
(h : ∀ i, s i ∈ l i) (hfin : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, s i = univ) : univ.pi s ∈ pi l := by
filter_upwards [pi_mem_pi hfin fun i _ ↦ h i] with a ha i _
if hi : s i = univ then
simp [hi]
else
exact ha i hi
/-- Given a family of maps `f i : α i → β i` and a family of filters `l i : Filter (α i)`,
if all but finitely many of `f i` are surjective,
then the indexed product of `f i`s maps the indexed product of the filters `l i`
to the indexed products of their pushforwards under individual `f i`s.
See also `map_piMap_pi_finite` for the case of a finite index type.
-/
theorem map_piMap_pi {α β : ι → Type*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) (l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)) :
map (Pi.map f) (pi l) = pi fun i ↦ map (f i) (l i) := by
refine le_antisymm (tendsto_piMap_pi fun _ ↦ tendsto_map) ?_
refine ((hasBasis_pi fun i ↦ (l i).basis_sets).map _).ge_iff.2 ?_
rintro ⟨I, s⟩ ⟨hI : I.Finite, hs : ∀ i ∈ I, s i ∈ l i⟩
classical
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise_univ, piMap_image_univ_pi]
refine univ_pi_mem_pi (fun i ↦ ?_) ?_
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
· simpa [hi] using image_mem_map (hs i hi)
· simp [hi]
· filter_upwards [hf, hI.compl_mem_cofinite] with i hsurj (hiI : i ∉ I)
simp [hiI, hsurj.range_eq]
/-- Given finite families of maps `f i : α i → β i` and of filters `l i : Filter (α i)`,
the indexed product of `f i`s maps the indexed product of the filters `l i`
to the indexed products of their pushforwards under individual `f i`s.
See also `map_piMap_pi` for a more general case.
| -/
theorem map_piMap_pi_finite {α β : ι → Type*} [Finite ι]
(f : ∀ i, α i → β i) (l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)) :
map (Pi.map f) (pi l) = pi fun i ↦ map (f i) (l i) :=
map_piMap_pi (by simp) l
end Filter
open Filter
lemma Set.Finite.cofinite_inf_principal_compl {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = cofinite := by
simpa using hs.compl_mem_cofinite
lemma Set.Finite.cofinite_inf_principal_diff {s t : Set α} (ht : t.Finite) :
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Cofinite.lean | 181 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
import Mathlib.Algebra.GradedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
/-!
# Weighted homogeneous polynomials
It is possible to assign weights (in a commutative additive monoid `M`) to the variables of a
multivariate polynomial ring, so that monomials of the ring then have a weighted degree with
respect to the weights of the variables. The weights are represented by a function `w : σ → M`,
where `σ` are the indeterminates.
A multivariate polynomial `φ` is weighted homogeneous of weighted degree `m : M` if all monomials
occurring in `φ` have the same weighted degree `m`.
## Main definitions/lemmas
* `weightedTotalDegree' w φ` : the weighted total degree of a multivariate polynomial with respect
to the weights `w`, taking values in `WithBot M`.
* `weightedTotalDegree w φ` : When `M` has a `⊥` element, we can define the weighted total degree
of a multivariate polynomial as a function taking values in `M`.
* `IsWeightedHomogeneous w φ m`: a predicate that asserts that `φ` is weighted homogeneous
of weighted degree `m` with respect to the weights `w`.
* `weightedHomogeneousSubmodule R w m`: the submodule of homogeneous polynomials
of weighted degree `m`.
* `weightedHomogeneousComponent w m`: the additive morphism that projects polynomials
onto their summand that is weighted homogeneous of degree `n` with respect to `w`.
* `sum_weightedHomogeneousComponent`: every polynomial is the sum of its weighted homogeneous
components.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finset Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid M]
/-! ### `weight` -/
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup M]
/-- The weighted total degree of a multivariate polynomial, taking values in `WithBot M`. -/
def weightedTotalDegree' (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : WithBot M :=
p.support.sup fun s => weight w s
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree'` of a polynomial `p` is `⊥` if and only if `p = 0`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree'_eq_bot_iff (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
weightedTotalDegree' w p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree', Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff, mem_support_iff, WithBot.coe_ne_bot,
MvPolynomial.eq_zero_iff]
exact forall_congr' fun _ => Classical.not_not
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree'` of the zero polynomial is `⊥`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree'_zero (w : σ → M) :
weightedTotalDegree' w (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ⊥ := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree', support_zero, Finset.sup_empty]
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot M]
/-- When `M` has a `⊥` element, we can define the weighted total degree of a multivariate
polynomial as a function taking values in `M`. -/
def weightedTotalDegree (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : M :=
p.support.sup fun s => weight w s
/-- This lemma relates `weightedTotalDegree` and `weightedTotalDegree'`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree_coe (w : σ → M) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
weightedTotalDegree' w p = ↑(weightedTotalDegree w p) := by
rw [Ne, ← weightedTotalDegree'_eq_bot_iff w p, ← Ne, WithBot.ne_bot_iff_exists] at hp
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hp
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [weightedTotalDegree, weightedTotalDegree', Finset.sup_le_iff, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
intro b
exact Finset.le_sup
· simp only [weightedTotalDegree]
have hm' : weightedTotalDegree' w p ≤ m := le_of_eq hm.symm
rw [← hm]
| simpa [weightedTotalDegree'] using hm'
/-- The `weightedTotalDegree` of the zero polynomial is `⊥`. -/
theorem weightedTotalDegree_zero (w : σ → M) :
weightedTotalDegree w (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ⊥ := by
simp only [weightedTotalDegree, support_zero, Finset.sup_empty]
theorem le_weightedTotalDegree (w : σ → M) {φ : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : σ →₀ ℕ}
(hd : d ∈ φ.support) : weight w d ≤ φ.weightedTotalDegree w :=
le_sup hd
end OrderBot
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/WeightedHomogeneous.lean | 105 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,459 | 2,460 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,594 | 1,643 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
/-!
# Monad Operations for Probability Mass Functions
This file constructs two operations on `PMF` that give it a monad structure.
`pure a` is the distribution where a single value `a` has probability `1`.
`bind pa pb : PMF β` is the distribution given by sampling `a : α` from `pa : PMF α`,
and then sampling from `pb a : PMF β` to get a final result `b : β`.
`bindOnSupport` generalizes `bind` to allow binding to a partial function,
so that the second argument only needs to be defined on the support of the first argument.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory
namespace PMF
section Pure
open scoped Classical in
/-- The pure `PMF` is the `PMF` where all the mass lies in one point.
The value of `pure a` is `1` at `a` and `0` elsewhere. -/
def pure (a : α) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a' => if a' = a then 1 else 0, hasSum_ite_eq _ _⟩
variable (a a' : α)
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem pure_apply : pure a a' = if a' = a then 1 else 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_pure : (pure a).support = {a} :=
Set.ext fun a' => by simp [mem_support_iff]
theorem mem_support_pure_iff : a' ∈ (pure a).support ↔ a' = a := by simp
theorem pure_apply_self : pure a a = 1 :=
if_pos rfl
theorem pure_apply_of_ne (h : a' ≠ a) : pure a a' = 0 :=
if_neg h
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (PMF α) :=
⟨pure default⟩
section Measure
variable (s : Set α)
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_pure_apply : (pure a).toOuterMeasure s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 := by
refine (toOuterMeasure_apply (pure a) s).trans ?_
split_ifs with ha
· refine (tsum_congr fun b => ?_).trans (tsum_ite_eq a 1)
exact ite_eq_left_iff.2 fun hb =>
symm (ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => (hb <| h.symm ▸ ha).elim)
· refine (tsum_congr fun b => ?_).trans tsum_zero
exact ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun hb =>
ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => (ha <| h ▸ hb).elim
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The measure of a set under `pure a` is `1` for sets containing `a` and `0` otherwise. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_pure_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(pure a).toMeasure s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (pure a) s hs).trans (toOuterMeasure_pure_apply a s)
theorem toMeasure_pure : (pure a).toMeasure = Measure.dirac a :=
Measure.ext fun s hs => by rw [toMeasure_pure_apply a s hs, Measure.dirac_apply' a hs]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPMF_dirac [Countable α] [h : MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
(Measure.dirac a).toPMF = pure a := by
rw [toPMF_eq_iff_toMeasure_eq, toMeasure_pure]
end Measure
end Pure
section Bind
/-- The monadic bind operation for `PMF`. -/
def bind (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) : PMF β :=
⟨fun b => ∑' a, p a * f a b,
ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2
(ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans <| by simp only [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, tsum_coe, mul_one])⟩
variable (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) (g : β → PMF γ)
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (b : β) : p.bind f b = ∑' a, p a * f a b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_bind : (p.bind f).support = ⋃ a ∈ p.support, (f a).support :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [mem_support_iff, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, not_or]
theorem mem_support_bind_iff (b : β) :
b ∈ (p.bind f).support ↔ ∃ a ∈ p.support, b ∈ (f a).support := by
simp only [support_bind, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem pure_bind (a : α) (f : α → PMF β) : (pure a).bind f = f a := by
classical
have : ∀ b a', ite (a' = a) (f a' b) 0 = ite (a' = a) (f a b) 0 := fun b a' => by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
ext b
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem bind_pure : p.bind pure = p :=
PMF.ext fun x => (bind_apply _ _ _).trans (_root_.trans
(tsum_eq_single x fun y hy => by rw [pure_apply_of_ne _ _ hy.symm, mul_zero]) <|
by rw [pure_apply_self, mul_one])
@[simp]
theorem bind_const (p : PMF α) (q : PMF β) : (p.bind fun _ => q) = q :=
PMF.ext fun x => by rw [bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_right, tsum_coe, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem bind_bind : (p.bind f).bind g = p.bind fun a => (f a).bind g :=
PMF.ext fun b => by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_inj.symm, bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm,
ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using ENNReal.tsum_comm
theorem bind_comm (p : PMF α) (q : PMF β) (f : α → β → PMF γ) :
(p.bind fun a => q.bind (f a)) = q.bind fun b => p.bind fun a => f a b :=
PMF.ext fun b => by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_inj.symm, bind_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm,
ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_comm] using ENNReal.tsum_comm
section Measure
variable (s : Set β)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_bind_apply :
(p.bind f).toOuterMeasure s = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toOuterMeasure s := by
classical
calc
(p.bind f).toOuterMeasure s = ∑' b, if b ∈ s then ∑' a, p a * f a b else 0 := by
simp [toOuterMeasure_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
_ = ∑' (b) (a), p a * if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 := tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> simp
_ = ∑' (a) (b), p a * if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 := ENNReal.tsum_comm
_ = ∑' a, p a * ∑' b, if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 := tsum_congr fun _ => ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
_ = ∑' a, p a * ∑' b, if b ∈ s then f a b else 0 :=
(tsum_congr fun a => (congr_arg fun x => p a * x) <| tsum_congr fun b => by split_ifs <;> rfl)
_ = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toOuterMeasure s :=
tsum_congr fun a => by simp only [toOuterMeasure_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
/-- The measure of a set under `p.bind f` is the sum over `a : α`
of the probability of `a` under `p` times the measure of the set under `f a`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_bind_apply [MeasurableSpace β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(p.bind f).toMeasure s = ∑' a, p a * (f a).toMeasure s :=
(toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (p.bind f) s hs).trans
((toOuterMeasure_bind_apply p f s).trans
(tsum_congr fun a =>
congr_arg (fun x => p a * x) (toMeasure_apply_eq_toOuterMeasure_apply (f a) s hs).symm))
end Measure
end Bind
instance : Monad PMF where
pure a := pure a
bind pa pb := pa.bind pb
section BindOnSupport
/-- Generalized version of `bind` allowing `f` to only be defined on the support of `p`.
`p.bind f` is equivalent to `p.bindOnSupport (fun a _ ↦ f a)`, see `bindOnSupport_eq_bind`. -/
def bindOnSupport (p : PMF α) (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β) : PMF β :=
⟨fun b => ∑' a, p a * if h : p a = 0 then 0 else f a h b, ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.2 (by
refine ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans (_root_.trans (tsum_congr fun a => ?_) p.tsum_coe)
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, zero_mul]
· rw [(f a h).tsum_coe, mul_one])⟩
variable {p : PMF α} (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β)
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_apply (b : β) :
p.bindOnSupport f b = ∑' a, p a * if h : p a = 0 then 0 else f a h b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_bindOnSupport :
(p.bindOnSupport f).support = ⋃ (a : α) (h : a ∈ p.support), (f a h).support := by
refine Set.ext fun b => ?_
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, not_or, mem_support_iff, bindOnSupport_apply, Ne, not_forall,
mul_eq_zero, Set.mem_iUnion]
exact
⟨fun hb =>
let ⟨a, ⟨ha, ha'⟩⟩ := hb
⟨a, ha, by simpa [ha] using ha'⟩,
fun hb =>
let ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩ := hb
⟨a, ⟨ha, by simpa [(mem_support_iff _ a).1 ha] using ha'⟩⟩⟩
theorem mem_support_bindOnSupport_iff (b : β) :
b ∈ (p.bindOnSupport f).support ↔ ∃ (a : α) (h : a ∈ p.support), b ∈ (f a h).support := by
simp only [support_bindOnSupport, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion]
/-- `bindOnSupport` reduces to `bind` if `f` doesn't depend on the additional hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_eq_bind (p : PMF α) (f : α → PMF β) :
(p.bindOnSupport fun a _ => f a) = p.bind f := by
ext b
have : ∀ a, ite (p a = 0) 0 (p a * f a b) = p a * f a b :=
fun a => ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h => h.symm ▸ symm (zero_mul <| f a b)
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply fun a _ => f a, p.bind_apply f, dite_eq_ite, mul_ite,
mul_zero, this]
theorem bindOnSupport_eq_zero_iff (b : β) :
p.bindOnSupport f b = 0 ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : p a ≠ 0), f a ha b = 0 := by
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_not_imp_left]
exact ⟨fun h a ha => Trans.trans (dif_neg ha).symm (h a ha),
fun h a ha => Trans.trans (dif_neg ha) (h a ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem pure_bindOnSupport (a : α) (f : ∀ (a' : α) (_ : a' ∈ (pure a).support), PMF β) :
(pure a).bindOnSupport f = f a ((mem_support_pure_iff a a).mpr rfl) := by
refine PMF.ext fun b => ?_
simp only [bindOnSupport_apply, pure_apply]
classical
refine _root_.trans (tsum_congr fun a' => ?_) (tsum_ite_eq a _)
by_cases h : a' = a <;> simp [h]
theorem bindOnSupport_pure (p : PMF α) : (p.bindOnSupport fun a _ => pure a) = p := by
simp only [PMF.bind_pure, PMF.bindOnSupport_eq_bind]
@[simp]
theorem bindOnSupport_bindOnSupport (p : PMF α) (f : ∀ a ∈ p.support, PMF β)
(g : ∀ b ∈ (p.bindOnSupport f).support, PMF γ) :
(p.bindOnSupport f).bindOnSupport g =
p.bindOnSupport fun a ha =>
(f a ha).bindOnSupport fun b hb =>
g b ((mem_support_bindOnSupport_iff f b).mpr ⟨a, ha, hb⟩) := by
refine PMF.ext fun a => ?_
dsimp only [bindOnSupport_apply]
simp only [← tsum_dite_right, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left.symm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_right.symm]
classical
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero, dite_eq_left_iff]
refine ENNReal.tsum_comm.trans (tsum_congr fun a' => tsum_congr fun b => ?_)
| split_ifs with h _ h_1 _ h_2
any_goals ring1
· have := h_1 a'
simp? [h] at this says simp only [h, ↓reduceDIte, mul_eq_zero, false_or] at this
contradiction
· simp [h_2]
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Monad.lean | 263 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
| else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 963 | 966 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) :
gcd (a ^ b - 1) (a ^ c - 1) = a ^ gcd b c - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb
· simp
replace hb : c % b < b := mod_lt c hb
rw [gcd_rec, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one, pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one, ← gcd_rec]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h,
← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp]
| theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 115 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Continuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Complex
/-!
# Measurability of scalar products
-/
variable {α : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {E : Type*}
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]), fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.inner {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫ :=
Continuous.measurable2 continuous_inner hf hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.const_inner {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {c : E} {f : α → E} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun t => ⟪c, f t⟫ :=
Measurable.inner measurable_const hf
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.inner_const {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {c : E} {f : α → E} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun t => ⟪f t, c⟫ :=
Measurable.inner hf measurable_const
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]), fun_prop]
theorem AEMeasurable.inner {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
[SecondCountableTopology E] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α} {f g : α → E}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) μ := by
| refine ⟨fun x => ⟪hf.mk f x, hg.mk g x⟫, hf.measurable_mk.inner hg.measurable_mk, ?_⟩
refine hf.ae_eq_mk.mp (hg.ae_eq_mk.mono fun x hxg hxf => ?_)
dsimp only
congr
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_inner {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace E]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SpecialFunctions/Inner.lean | 41 | 47 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six (f : Fin 6 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven (f : Fin 7 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight (f : Fin 8 → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_const (n : ℕ) (x : M) : ∏ _i : Fin n, x = x ^ n := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_zero {v : Fin n.succ → M} :
∏ i ∈ Ioi 0, v i = ∏ j : Fin n, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_zero_eq_map, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) (v : Fin n.succ → M) :
| ∏ j ∈ Ioi i.succ, v j = ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, v j.succ := by
rw [← map_succEmb_Ioi, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 167 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.DenseEmbedding
/-!
# Uniform embeddings of uniform spaces.
Extension of uniform continuous functions.
-/
open Filter Function Set Uniformity Topology
section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
{f : α → β}
/-!
### Uniform inducing maps
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is called *uniform inducing* if the uniformity filter
on `α` is the pullback of the uniformity filter on `β` under `Prod.map f f`. If `α` is a separated
space, then this implies that `f` is injective, hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformInducing (f : α → β) : Prop where
/-- The uniformity filter on the domain is the pullback of the uniformity filter on the codomain
under `Prod.map f f`. -/
comap_uniformity : comap (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 β) = 𝓤 α
lemma isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f = ‹UniformSpace α› := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformSpace.ext_iff, Filter.ext_iff]
rfl
protected alias ⟨IsUniformInducing.comap_uniformSpace, _⟩ := isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace
lemma isUniformInducing_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, UniformContinuous, tendsto_iff_comap, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]; rfl
protected lemma Filter.HasBasis.isUniformInducing_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp [isUniformInducing_iff', h.uniformContinuous_iff h', (h'.comap _).le_basis_iff h, subset_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.mk' {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ x y : α, (f x, f y) ∈ t → (x, y) ∈ s) : IsUniformInducing f :=
⟨by simp [eq_comm, Filter.ext_iff, subset_def, h]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.id : IsUniformInducing (@id α) :=
⟨by rw [← Prod.map_def, Prod.map_id, comap_id]⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨by rw [← hf.1, ← hg.1, comap_comap]; rfl⟩
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hg.comp⟩
rw [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, ← h.comap_uniformity,
Function.comp_def, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.basis_uniformity {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {ι : Sort*}
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (H : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => Prod.map f f ⁻¹' s i :=
hf.1 ▸ H.comap _
theorem IsUniformInducing.cauchy_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) {F : Filter α} :
Cauchy (map f F) ↔ Cauchy F := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap, ← hf.comap_uniformity]
theorem IsUniformInducing.of_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hgf : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f)) : IsUniformInducing f := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ hf.le_comap⟩
rw [← hgf.1, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_def, ← Prod.map_comp_map f f g g, ← comap_comap]
exact comap_mono hg.le_comap
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous {f : α → β} (hf : IsUniformInducing f) :
UniformContinuous f := (isUniformInducing_iff'.1 hf).1
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuous_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuous f ↔ UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuous, Tendsto]
simp only [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def]
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformInducing_comp_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) : IsUniformInducing (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformInducing f := by
simp only [isUniformInducing_iff, ← hg.comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.uniformContinuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {S : Set α}
(hg : IsUniformInducing g) :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (g ∘ f) S := by
dsimp only [UniformContinuousOn, Tendsto]
rw [← hg.comap_uniformity, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, Filter.map_map, comp_def, comp_def]
theorem IsUniformInducing.isInducing {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) : IsInducing f := by
obtain rfl := h.comap_uniformSpace
exact .induced f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias IsUniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias UniformInducing.inducing := IsUniformInducing.isInducing
theorem IsUniformInducing.prod {α' : Type*} {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace α'] [UniformSpace β']
{e₁ : α → α'} {e₂ : β → β'} (h₁ : IsUniformInducing e₁) (h₂ : IsUniformInducing e₂) :
IsUniformInducing fun p : α × β => (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) :=
⟨by simp [Function.comp_def, uniformity_prod, ← h₁.1, ← h₂.1, comap_inf, comap_comap]⟩
lemma IsUniformInducing.isDenseInducing (h : IsUniformInducing f) (hd : DenseRange f) :
IsDenseInducing f where
toIsInducing := h.isInducing
dense := hd
lemma SeparationQuotient.isUniformInducing_mk :
IsUniformInducing (mk : α → SeparationQuotient α) :=
⟨comap_mk_uniformity⟩
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.injective [T0Space α] {f : α → β} (h : IsUniformInducing f) :
Injective f :=
h.isInducing.injective
/-!
### Uniform embeddings
-/
/-- A map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces is a *uniform embedding* if it is uniform inducing and
injective. If `α` is a separated space, then the latter assumption follows from the former. -/
@[mk_iff]
structure IsUniformEmbedding (f : α → β) : Prop extends IsUniformInducing f where
/-- A uniform embedding is injective. -/
injective : Function.Injective f
lemma IsUniformEmbedding.isUniformInducing (hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformInducing f :=
hf.toIsUniformInducing
theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff' {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧ comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, isUniformInducing_iff']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧
(∀ i, p' i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ s' i) ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, and_comm, h.isUniformInducing_iff h']
theorem Filter.HasBasis.isUniformEmbedding_iff {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {p' : ι' → Prop} {s s'}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) (h' : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p' s') {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
(∀ j, p j → ∃ i, p' i ∧ ∀ x y, (f x, f y) ∈ s' i → (x, y) ∈ s j) := by
simp only [h.isUniformEmbedding_iff' h', h.uniformContinuous_iff h']
theorem isUniformEmbedding_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} :
IsUniformEmbedding (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) :=
{ comap_uniformity := rfl
injective := Subtype.val_injective }
theorem isUniformEmbedding_set_inclusion {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) :
IsUniformEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
comap_uniformity := by rw [uniformity_subtype, uniformity_subtype, comap_comap]; rfl
injective := inclusion_injective hst
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.comp {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformEmbedding g) {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformEmbedding f) : IsUniformEmbedding (g ∘ f) where
toIsUniformInducing := hg.isUniformInducing.comp hf.isUniformInducing
injective := hg.injective.comp hf.injective
theorem IsUniformEmbedding.of_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : IsUniformEmbedding g) {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding (g ∘ f) ↔ IsUniformEmbedding f := by
simp_rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff, hg.isUniformInducing.of_comp_iff, hg.injective.of_comp_iff f]
theorem Equiv.isUniformEmbedding {α β : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] (f : α ≃ β)
(h₁ : UniformContinuous f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous f.symm) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨f.injective, h₁, by rwa [← Equiv.prodCongr_apply, ← map_equiv_symm]⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_inl : IsUniformEmbedding (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨Sum.inl_injective, uniformContinuous_inl, fun s hs =>
⟨Prod.map Sum.inl Sum.inl '' s ∪ range (Prod.map Sum.inr Sum.inr),
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map hs) range_mem_map,
fun x h => by simpa [Prod.map_apply'] using h⟩⟩
theorem isUniformEmbedding_inr : IsUniformEmbedding (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
isUniformEmbedding_iff'.2 ⟨Sum.inr_injective, uniformContinuous_inr, fun s hs =>
⟨range (Prod.map Sum.inl Sum.inl) ∪ Prod.map Sum.inr Sum.inr '' s,
union_mem_sup range_mem_map (image_mem_map hs),
fun x h => by simpa [Prod.map_apply'] using h⟩⟩
| /-- If the domain of a `IsUniformInducing` map `f` is a T₀ space, then `f` is injective,
hence it is a `IsUniformEmbedding`. -/
protected theorem IsUniformInducing.isUniformEmbedding [T0Space α] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsUniformInducing f) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.isInducing.injective⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformEmbedding.lean | 200 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lookmap
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `List (Sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : Sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `List (Sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `List.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `List.NodupKeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `List.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `List.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `List.kerase` removes a value.
- `List.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `List.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `List.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universe u u' v v'
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {α' : Type u'} {β : α → Type v} {β' : α' → Type v'} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem ne_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias not_eq_key := ne_key
/-! ### `NodupKeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupKeys_flatten {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (flatten L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_flatten, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr! with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne, Sigma.forall]
theorem nodup_zipIdx_map_snd (l : List α) : (l.zipIdx.map Prod.snd).Nodup := by
simp [List.nodup_range']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")] alias nodup_enum_map_fst := nodup_zipIdx_map_snd
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
/-! ### `dlookup` -/
/-- `dlookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
obtain ⟨b', h'⟩ := Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h))
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
theorem dlookup_map (l : List (Sigma β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (g : ∀ a, β a → β' (f a)) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, g _ x.2⟩).dlookup (f a) = (l.dlookup a).map (g a) := by
induction' l with b l IH
· rw [map_nil, dlookup_nil, dlookup_nil, Option.map_none']
· rw [map_cons]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a b.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.map_some']
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ h, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ (fun he => h <| hf he), IH]
theorem dlookup_map₁ {β : Type v} (l : List (Σ _ : α, β))
{f : α → α'} (hf : Function.Injective f) (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨f x.1, x.2⟩ : List (Σ _ : α', β)).dlookup (f a) = l.dlookup a := by
rw [dlookup_map (β' := fun _ => β) l hf (fun _ x => x) a, Option.map_id']
theorem dlookup_map₂ {γ δ : α → Type*} {l : List (Σ a, γ a)} {f : ∀ a, γ a → δ a} (a : α) :
(l.map fun x => ⟨x.1, f _ x.2⟩ : List (Σ a, δ a)).dlookup a = (l.dlookup a).map (f a) :=
dlookup_map l Function.injective_id _ _
/-! ### `lookupAll` -/
/-- `lookup_all a l` is the list of all values in `l` corresponding to the key `a`. -/
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not, reduceCtorEq]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, lookupAll_cons_ne]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons _
theorem lookupAll_length_le_one (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
length (lookupAll a l) ≤ 1 := by
have := Nodup.sublist ((lookupAll_sublist a l).map _) h
rw [map_map] at this
rwa [← nodup_replicate, ← map_const]
theorem lookupAll_eq_dlookup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
lookupAll a l = (dlookup a l).toList := by
rw [← head?_lookupAll]
have h1 := lookupAll_length_le_one a h; revert h1
rcases lookupAll a l with (_ | ⟨b, _ | ⟨c, l⟩⟩) <;> intro h1 <;> try rfl
exact absurd h1 (by simp)
theorem lookupAll_nodup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) : (lookupAll a l).Nodup := by
(rw [lookupAll_eq_dlookup a h]; apply Option.toList_nodup)
theorem perm_lookupAll (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookupAll a l₁ = lookupAll a l₂ := by
simp [lookupAll_eq_dlookup, nd₁, nd₂, perm_dlookup a nd₁ nd₂ p]
theorem dlookup_append (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)) (a : α) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).dlookup a = (l₁.dlookup a).or (l₂.dlookup a) := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rfl
| cons x l₁ IH =>
rw [cons_append]
obtain rfl | hb := Decidable.eq_or_ne a x.1
· rw [dlookup_cons_eq, dlookup_cons_eq, Option.or]
· rw [dlookup_cons_ne _ _ hb, dlookup_cons_ne _ _ hb, IH]
/-! ### `kreplace` -/
/-- Replaces the first value with key `a` by `b`. -/
def kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
lookmap fun s => if a = s.1 then some ⟨a, b⟩ else none
theorem kreplace_of_forall_not (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)}
(H : ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
lookmap_of_forall_not _ <| by
rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h; dsimp; split_ifs
· subst a'
exact H _ h
· rfl
theorem kreplace_self {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : kreplace a b l = l := by
refine (lookmap_congr ?_).trans (lookmap_id' (Option.guard fun (s : Sigma β) => a = s.1) ?_ _)
· rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h'
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· subst a'
simp [nd.eq_of_mk_mem h h']
· rfl
· rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟩
theorem keys_kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (kreplace a b l).keys = l.keys :=
lookmap_map_eq _ _ <| by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₂⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h <;> simp +contextual [h]
theorem kreplace_nodupKeys (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kreplace a b l).NodupKeys ↔ l.NodupKeys := by simp [NodupKeys, keys_kreplace]
theorem Perm.kreplace {a : α} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kreplace a b l₁ ~ kreplace a b l₂ :=
perm_lookmap _ <| by
refine nd.pairwise_ne.imp ?_
intro x y h z h₁ w h₂
split_ifs at h₁ h₂ with h_2 h_1 <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂
exact (h (h_2.symm.trans h_1)).elim
/-! ### `kerase` -/
/-- Remove the first pair with the key `a`. -/
def kerase (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
eraseP fun s => a = s.1
@[simp]
theorem kerase_nil {a} : @kerase _ β _ a [] = [] :=
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_eq {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a = s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = l := by simp [kerase, h]
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_ne {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = s :: kerase a l := by simp [kerase, h]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 379 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Oleksandr Manzyuk
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Bicategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
/-!
# The category of bimodule objects over a pair of monoid objects.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [HasCoequalizers C]
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
theorem id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc {W X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⊗ Y ⟶ W)
(wh : (Z ◁ f) ≫ h = (Z ◁ g) ≫ h) :
(Z ◁ coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft Z) f g).inv ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc (tensorLeft Z) f g h wh
theorem id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : Z ⊗ X ⟶ X') (q : Z ⊗ Y ⟶ Y') (wf : (Z ◁ f) ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : (Z ◁ g) ≫ q = p ≫ g') (h : Y' ⟶ Z') (wh : f' ≫ h = g' ≫ h) :
(Z ◁ coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft Z) f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (Z ◁ f) (Z ◁ g) f' g' p q wf wg) ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
q ≫ h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc (tensorLeft Z) f g f' g' p q wf wg h wh
end
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
theorem π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc {W X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⊗ Z ⟶ W)
(wh : (f ▷ Z) ≫ h = (g ▷ Z) ≫ h) :
(coequalizer.π f g ▷ Z) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight Z) f g).inv ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc (tensorRight Z) f g h wh
theorem π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⊗ Z ⟶ X') (q : Y ⊗ Z ⟶ Y') (wf : (f ▷ Z) ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : (g ▷ Z) ≫ q = p ≫ g') (h : Y' ⟶ Z') (wh : f' ≫ h = g' ≫ h) :
(coequalizer.π f g ▷ Z) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight Z) f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (f ▷ Z) (g ▷ Z) f' g' p q wf wg) ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
q ≫ h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc (tensorRight Z) f g f' g' p q wf wg h wh
end
end
/-- A bimodule object for a pair of monoid objects, all internal to some monoidal category. -/
structure Bimod (A B : Mon_ C) where
/-- The underlying monoidal category -/
X : C
/-- The left action of this bimodule object -/
actLeft : A.X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_actLeft : (A.one ▷ X) ≫ actLeft = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
left_assoc :
(A.mul ▷ X) ≫ actLeft = (α_ A.X A.X X).hom ≫ (A.X ◁ actLeft) ≫ actLeft := by aesop_cat
/-- The right action of this bimodule object -/
actRight : X ⊗ B.X ⟶ X
actRight_one : (X ◁ B.one) ≫ actRight = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
right_assoc :
(X ◁ B.mul) ≫ actRight = (α_ X B.X B.X).inv ≫ (actRight ▷ B.X) ≫ actRight := by
aesop_cat
middle_assoc :
(actLeft ▷ B.X) ≫ actRight = (α_ A.X X B.X).hom ≫ (A.X ◁ actRight) ≫ actLeft := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Bimod.one_actLeft Bimod.actRight_one Bimod.left_assoc
Bimod.right_assoc Bimod.middle_assoc
namespace Bimod
variable {A B : Mon_ C} (M : Bimod A B)
/-- A morphism of bimodule objects. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (M N : Bimod A B) where
/-- The morphism between `M`'s monoidal category and `N`'s monoidal category -/
hom : M.X ⟶ N.X
left_act_hom : M.actLeft ≫ hom = (A.X ◁ hom) ≫ N.actLeft := by aesop_cat
right_act_hom : M.actRight ≫ hom = (hom ▷ B.X) ≫ N.actRight := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.left_act_hom Hom.right_act_hom
/-- The identity morphism on a bimodule object. -/
@[simps]
def id' (M : Bimod A B) : Hom M M where hom := 𝟙 M.X
instance homInhabited (M : Bimod A B) : Inhabited (Hom M M) :=
⟨id' M⟩
/-- Composition of bimodule object morphisms. -/
@[simps]
def comp {M N O : Bimod A B} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N O) : Hom M O where hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom
instance : Category (Bimod A B) where
Hom M N := Hom M N
id := id'
comp f g := comp f g
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {M N : Bimod A B} (f g : M ⟶ N) (h : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g :=
Hom.ext h
@[simp]
theorem id_hom' (M : Bimod A B) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M).hom = 𝟙 M.X :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom' {M N K : Bimod A B} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
(f ≫ g : Hom M K).hom = f.hom ≫ g.hom :=
rfl
/-- Construct an isomorphism of bimodules by giving an isomorphism between the underlying objects
and checking compatibility with left and right actions only in the forward direction.
-/
@[simps]
def isoOfIso {X Y : Mon_ C} {P Q : Bimod X Y} (f : P.X ≅ Q.X)
(f_left_act_hom : P.actLeft ≫ f.hom = (X.X ◁ f.hom) ≫ Q.actLeft)
(f_right_act_hom : P.actRight ≫ f.hom = (f.hom ▷ Y.X) ≫ Q.actRight) : P ≅ Q where
hom :=
{ hom := f.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := f.inv
left_act_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id,
f_left_act_hom, ← Category.assoc, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id, Category.id_comp]
right_act_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id,
f_right_act_hom, ← Category.assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight, Iso.inv_hom_id,
MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight, Category.id_comp] }
hom_inv_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [Iso.hom_inv_id]
inv_hom_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [Iso.inv_hom_id]
variable (A)
/-- A monoid object as a bimodule over itself. -/
@[simps]
def regular : Bimod A A where
X := A.X
actLeft := A.mul
actRight := A.mul
instance : Inhabited (Bimod A A) :=
⟨regular A⟩
/-- The forgetful functor from bimodule objects to the ambient category. -/
def forget : Bimod A B ⥤ C where
obj A := A.X
map f := f.hom
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [HasCoequalizers C]
namespace TensorBimod
variable {R S T : Mon_ C} (P : Bimod R S) (Q : Bimod S T)
/-- The underlying object of the tensor product of two bimodules. -/
noncomputable def X : C :=
coequalizer (P.actRight ▷ Q.X) ((α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ Q.actLeft))
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
/-- Left action for the tensor product of two bimodules. -/
noncomputable def actLeft : R.X ⊗ X P Q ⟶ X P Q :=
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft R.X) _ _).inv ≫
colimMap
(parallelPairHom _ _ _ _
((α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((α_ _ _ _).inv ▷ _) ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ S.X ▷ Q.X))
((α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ Q.X))
(by
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, middle_assoc, comp_whiskerRight]
monoidal)
(by
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 1 => rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [whisker_exchange]
monoidal))
theorem whiskerLeft_π_actLeft :
(R.X ◁ coequalizer.π _ _) ≫ actLeft P Q =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ Q.X) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _ := by
erw [map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap (tensorLeft _)]
simp only [Category.assoc]
theorem one_act_left' : (R.one ▷ _) ≫ actLeft P Q = (λ_ _).hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
-- Porting note: had to replace `rw` by `erw`
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, one_actLeft]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [leftUnitor_naturality]
monoidal
theorem left_assoc' :
(R.mul ▷ _) ≫ actLeft P Q = (α_ R.X R.X _).hom ≫ (R.X ◁ actLeft P Q) ≫ actLeft P Q := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, left_assoc, comp_whiskerRight, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 2 3 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_π_actLeft,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 4 5 => rw [whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
monoidal
end
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
/-- Right action for the tensor product of two bimodules. -/
noncomputable def actRight : X P Q ⊗ T.X ⟶ X P Q :=
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight T.X) _ _).inv ≫
colimMap
(parallelPairHom _ _ _ _
((α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ S.X ◁ Q.actRight) ≫ (α_ _ _ _).inv)
((α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ Q.actRight))
(by
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
simp)
(by
dsimp
simp only [comp_whiskerRight, whisker_assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, middle_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
simp))
theorem π_tensor_id_actRight :
(coequalizer.π _ _ ▷ T.X) ≫ actRight P Q =
(α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ Q.actRight) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _ := by
erw [map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap (tensorRight _)]
simp only [Category.assoc]
theorem actRight_one' : (_ ◁ T.one) ≫ actRight P Q = (ρ_ _).hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
-- Porting note: had to replace `rw` by `erw`
slice_lhs 1 2 =>erw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, actRight_one]
simp
theorem right_assoc' :
(_ ◁ T.mul) ≫ actRight P Q =
(α_ _ T.X T.X).inv ≫ (actRight P Q ▷ T.X) ≫ actRight P Q := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
-- Porting note: had to replace some `rw` by `erw`
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, right_assoc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, π_tensor_id_actRight, comp_whiskerRight,
comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 4 5 => rw [π_tensor_id_actRight]
simp
end
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
theorem middle_assoc' :
(actLeft P Q ▷ T.X) ≫ actRight P Q =
(α_ R.X _ T.X).hom ≫ (R.X ◁ actRight P Q) ≫ actLeft P Q := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _ ⋙ tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, whiskerLeft_π_actLeft, comp_whiskerRight,
comp_whiskerRight]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
-- Porting note: had to replace `rw` by `erw`
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_middle]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, π_tensor_id_actRight,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 4 5 => rw [whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 4 5 => rw [whisker_exchange]
simp
end
end TensorBimod
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
/-- Tensor product of two bimodule objects as a bimodule object. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def tensorBimod {X Y Z : Mon_ C} (M : Bimod X Y) (N : Bimod Y Z) : Bimod X Z where
X := TensorBimod.X M N
actLeft := TensorBimod.actLeft M N
actRight := TensorBimod.actRight M N
one_actLeft := TensorBimod.one_act_left' M N
actRight_one := TensorBimod.actRight_one' M N
left_assoc := TensorBimod.left_assoc' M N
right_assoc := TensorBimod.right_assoc' M N
middle_assoc := TensorBimod.middle_assoc' M N
/-- Left whiskering for morphisms of bimodule objects. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def whiskerLeft {X Y Z : Mon_ C} (M : Bimod X Y) {N₁ N₂ : Bimod Y Z} (f : N₁ ⟶ N₂) :
M.tensorBimod N₁ ⟶ M.tensorBimod N₂ where
hom :=
colimMap
(parallelPairHom _ _ _ _ (_ ◁ f.hom) (_ ◁ f.hom)
(by rw [whisker_exchange])
(by
simp only [Category.assoc, tensor_whiskerLeft, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
Iso.cancel_iso_hom_left]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Hom.left_act_hom]
simp))
left_act_hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [whisker_exchange]
simp
right_act_hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Hom.right_act_hom]
slice_rhs 1 2 =>
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight]
simp
/-- Right whiskering for morphisms of bimodule objects. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def whiskerRight {X Y Z : Mon_ C} {M₁ M₂ : Bimod X Y} (f : M₁ ⟶ M₂) (N : Bimod Y Z) :
M₁.tensorBimod N ⟶ M₂.tensorBimod N where
hom :=
colimMap
(parallelPairHom _ _ _ _ (f.hom ▷ _ ▷ _) (f.hom ▷ _)
(by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, Hom.right_act_hom, comp_whiskerRight])
(by
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whisker_exchange]
simp))
left_act_hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, Hom.left_act_hom]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
simp
right_act_hom := by
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whisker_exchange]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one,
comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight]
simp
end
namespace AssociatorBimod
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
variable {R S T U : Mon_ C} (P : Bimod R S) (Q : Bimod S T) (L : Bimod T U)
/-- An auxiliary morphism for the definition of the underlying morphism of the forward component of
the associator isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def homAux : (P.tensorBimod Q).X ⊗ L.X ⟶ (P.tensorBimod (Q.tensorBimod L)).X :=
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight L.X) _ _).inv ≫
coequalizer.desc ((α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ coequalizer.π _ _) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _)
(by
dsimp; dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.condition]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
simp)
/-- The underlying morphism of the forward component of the associator isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def hom :
((P.tensorBimod Q).tensorBimod L).X ⟶ (P.tensorBimod (Q.tensorBimod L)).X :=
coequalizer.desc (homAux P Q L)
(by
dsimp [homAux]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _ ⋙ tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight,
comp_whiskerRight, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_lhs 3 5 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality_middle]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, coequalizer.condition,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_rhs 3 5 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
simp)
theorem hom_left_act_hom' :
((P.tensorBimod Q).tensorBimod L).actLeft ≫ hom P Q L =
(R.X ◁ hom P Q L) ≫ (P.tensorBimod (Q.tensorBimod L)).actLeft := by
dsimp; dsimp [hom, homAux]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
rw [tensorLeft_map]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, coequalizer.π_desc,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _ ⋙ tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp; dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft,
comp_whiskerRight, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_lhs 4 6 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_rhs 1 3 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 3 4 => erw [TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft P (Q.tensorBimod L)]
slice_rhs 2 3 => erw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 3 4 => erw [whisker_exchange]
monoidal
theorem hom_right_act_hom' :
((P.tensorBimod Q).tensorBimod L).actRight ≫ hom P Q L =
(hom P Q L ▷ U.X) ≫ (P.tensorBimod (Q.tensorBimod L)).actRight := by
dsimp; dsimp [hom, homAux]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
rw [tensorRight_map]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, coequalizer.π_desc, comp_whiskerRight]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _ ⋙ tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp; dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 3 5 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 1 3 =>
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, ← comp_whiskerRight, π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc,
comp_whiskerRight, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 3 4 => erw [TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight P (Q.tensorBimod L)]
slice_rhs 2 3 => erw [associator_naturality_middle]
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
monoidal
/-- An auxiliary morphism for the definition of the underlying morphism of the inverse component of
the associator isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def invAux : P.X ⊗ (Q.tensorBimod L).X ⟶ ((P.tensorBimod Q).tensorBimod L).X :=
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft P.X) _ _).inv ≫
coequalizer.desc ((α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (coequalizer.π _ _ ▷ L.X) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _)
(by
dsimp; dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
rw [← Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc (α_ _ _ _) (P.X ◁ Q.actRight), comp_whiskerRight]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, Category.assoc, ← TensorBimod.π_tensor_id_actRight,
comp_whiskerRight]
slice_lhs 4 5 => rw [coequalizer.condition]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [associator_naturality_left]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [whisker_exchange]
monoidal)
/-- The underlying morphism of the inverse component of the associator isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def inv :
(P.tensorBimod (Q.tensorBimod L)).X ⟶ ((P.tensorBimod Q).tensorBimod L).X :=
coequalizer.desc (invAux P Q L)
(by
dsimp [invAux]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [TensorBimod.X]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 4 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, coequalizer.condition, comp_whiskerRight, comp_whiskerRight]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_rhs 2 3 =>
rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_rhs 4 6 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
monoidal)
theorem hom_inv_id : hom P Q L ≫ inv P Q L = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [hom, homAux, inv, invAux]
apply coequalizer.hom_ext
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
rw [tensorRight_map]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_lhs 2 4 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
dsimp only [TensorBimod.X]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [Category.comp_id]
rfl
theorem inv_hom_id : inv P Q L ≫ hom P Q L = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [hom, homAux, inv, invAux]
apply coequalizer.hom_ext
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
rw [tensorLeft_map]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_lhs 2 4 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
dsimp only [TensorBimod.X]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [Category.comp_id]
rfl
end AssociatorBimod
namespace LeftUnitorBimod
variable {R S : Mon_ C} (P : Bimod R S)
/-- The underlying morphism of the forward component of the left unitor isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def hom : TensorBimod.X (regular R) P ⟶ P.X :=
coequalizer.desc P.actLeft (by dsimp; rw [Category.assoc, left_assoc])
/-- The underlying morphism of the inverse component of the left unitor isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def inv : P.X ⟶ TensorBimod.X (regular R) P :=
(λ_ P.X).inv ≫ (R.one ▷ _) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _
theorem hom_inv_id : hom P ≫ inv P = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [hom, inv, TensorBimod.X]
ext; dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [leftUnitor_inv_naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 3 3 => rw [← Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc (α_ R.X R.X P.X) (R.X ◁ P.actLeft)]
slice_lhs 4 6 => rw [← Category.assoc, ← coequalizer.condition]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, Mon_.one_mul]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [Category.comp_id]
monoidal
theorem inv_hom_id : inv P ≫ hom P = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [hom, inv]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
rw [one_actLeft, Iso.inv_hom_id]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
theorem hom_left_act_hom' :
((regular R).tensorBimod P).actLeft ≫ hom P = (R.X ◁ hom P) ≫ P.actLeft := by
dsimp; dsimp [hom, TensorBimod.actLeft, regular]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 4 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [left_assoc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, coequalizer.π_desc]
rw [Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
theorem hom_right_act_hom' :
((regular R).tensorBimod P).actRight ≫ hom P = (hom P ▷ S.X) ≫ P.actRight := by
dsimp; dsimp [hom, TensorBimod.actRight, regular]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorRight _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 4 => rw [π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [middle_assoc]
simp only [Category.assoc]
end LeftUnitorBimod
namespace RightUnitorBimod
variable {R S : Mon_ C} (P : Bimod R S)
/-- The underlying morphism of the forward component of the right unitor isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def hom : TensorBimod.X P (regular S) ⟶ P.X :=
coequalizer.desc P.actRight (by dsimp; rw [Category.assoc, right_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc])
/-- The underlying morphism of the inverse component of the right unitor isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def inv : P.X ⟶ TensorBimod.X P (regular S) :=
(ρ_ P.X).inv ≫ (_ ◁ S.one) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _
theorem hom_inv_id : hom P ≫ inv P = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp only [hom, inv, TensorBimod.X]
ext; dsimp
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [rightUnitor_inv_naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.condition]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Mon_.mul_one]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [Category.comp_id]
monoidal
theorem inv_hom_id : inv P ≫ hom P = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [hom, inv]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [coequalizer.π_desc]
rw [actRight_one, Iso.inv_hom_id]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
theorem hom_left_act_hom' :
(P.tensorBimod (regular S)).actLeft ≫ hom P = (R.X ◁ hom P) ≫ P.actLeft := by
dsimp; dsimp [hom, TensorBimod.actLeft, regular]
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp
| slice_lhs 1 4 => rw [id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [middle_assoc]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, coequalizer.π_desc]
rw [Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Bimod.lean | 680 | 683 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Bounded order homomorphisms
This file defines (bounded) order homomorphisms.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `TopHom`: Maps which preserve `⊤`.
* `BotHom`: Maps which preserve `⊥`.
* `BoundedOrderHom`: Bounded order homomorphisms. Monotone maps which preserve `⊤` and `⊥`.
## Typeclasses
* `TopHomClass`
* `BotHomClass`
* `BoundedOrderHomClass`
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊤`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure TopHom (α β : Type*) [Top α] [Top β] where
/-- The underlying function. The preferred spelling is `DFunLike.coe`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The function preserves the top element. The preferred spelling is `map_top`. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The type of `⊥`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure BotHom (α β : Type*) [Bot α] [Bot β] where
/-- The underlying function. The preferred spelling is `DFunLike.coe`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The function preserves the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `map_bot`. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
/-- The type of bounded order homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure BoundedOrderHom (α β : Type*) [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [BoundedOrder α]
[BoundedOrder β] extends OrderHom α β where
/-- The function preserves the top element. The preferred spelling is `map_top`. -/
map_top' : toFun ⊤ = ⊤
/-- The function preserves the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `map_bot`. -/
map_bot' : toFun ⊥ = ⊥
section
/-- `TopHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊤`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `TopHom`. -/
class TopHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Top α] [Top β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- A `TopHomClass` morphism preserves the top element. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- `BotHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊥`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BotHom`. -/
class BotHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Bot α] [Bot β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- A `BotHomClass` morphism preserves the bottom element. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
/-- `BoundedOrderHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of bounded order morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `BoundedOrderHom`. -/
class BoundedOrderHomClass (F α β : Type*) [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends RelHomClass F ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop) ((· ≤ ·) : β → β → Prop) where
/-- Morphisms preserve the top element. The preferred spelling is `_root_.map_top`. -/
map_top (f : F) : f ⊤ = ⊤
/-- Morphisms preserve the bottom element. The preferred spelling is `_root_.map_bot`. -/
map_bot (f : F) : f ⊥ = ⊥
end
export TopHomClass (map_top)
export BotHomClass (map_bot)
attribute [simp] map_top map_bot
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedOrderHomClass.toTopHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] : TopHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedOrderHomClass F α β› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BoundedOrderHomClass.toBotHomClass [LE α] [LE β]
[BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] : BotHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹BoundedOrderHomClass F α β› with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toTopHomClass [LE α] [OrderTop α]
[PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : TopHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_top := fun f => top_le_iff.1 <| (map_inv_le_iff f).1 le_top }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBotHomClass [LE α] [OrderBot α]
[PartialOrder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : BotHomClass F α β :=
{ map_bot := fun f => le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_map_inv_iff f).1 bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toBoundedOrderHomClass [LE α] [BoundedOrder α]
[PartialOrder β] [BoundedOrder β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : BoundedOrderHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance, OrderIsoClass.toTopHomClass,
OrderIsoClass.toBotHomClass with }
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_top_iff [LE α] [OrderTop α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
(f : F) {a : α} : f a = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ := by
rw [← map_top f, (EquivLike.injective f).eq_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_bot_iff [LE α] [OrderBot α] [PartialOrder β] [OrderBot β] [OrderIsoClass F α β]
(f : F) {a : α} : f a = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [← map_bot f, (EquivLike.injective f).eq_iff]
end Equiv
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `TopHomClass F α β` into an actual
`TopHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `TopHom α β`. -/
@[coe]
def TopHomClass.toTopHom [Top α] [Top β] [TopHomClass F α β] (f : F) : TopHom α β :=
⟨f, map_top f⟩
instance [Top α] [Top β] [TopHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (TopHom α β) :=
⟨TopHomClass.toTopHom⟩
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `BotHomClass F α β` into an actual
`BotHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `BotHom α β`. -/
@[coe]
def BotHomClass.toBotHom [Bot α] [Bot β] [BotHomClass F α β] (f : F) : BotHom α β :=
⟨f, map_bot f⟩
instance [Bot α] [Bot β] [BotHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (BotHom α β) :=
⟨BotHomClass.toBotHom⟩
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `BoundedOrderHomClass F α β` into an actual
`BoundedOrderHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `BoundedOrderHom α β`. -/
@[coe]
def BoundedOrderHomClass.toBoundedOrderHom [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [BoundedOrder α]
[BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] (f : F) : BoundedOrderHom α β :=
{ (f : α →o β) with toFun := f, map_top' := map_top f, map_bot' := map_bot f }
instance [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [BoundedOrderHomClass F α β] :
CoeTC F (BoundedOrderHom α β) :=
⟨BoundedOrderHomClass.toBoundedOrderHom⟩
/-! ### Top homomorphisms -/
namespace TopHom
variable [Top α]
section Top
variable [Top β] [Top γ] [Top δ]
instance : FunLike (TopHom α β) α β where
coe := TopHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : TopHomClass (TopHom α β) α β where
map_top := TopHom.map_top'
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections TopHom (toFun → apply)
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : TopHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `TopHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : TopHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) :
TopHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_top' := h.symm ▸ f.map_top'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : TopHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : TopHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
instance : Inhabited (TopHom α β) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => ⊤, rfl⟩⟩
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `TopHom`. -/
protected def id : TopHom α α :=
⟨id, rfl⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(TopHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : TopHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `TopHom`s as a `TopHom`. -/
def comp (f : TopHom β γ) (g : TopHom α β) :
TopHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_top' := by rw [comp_apply, map_top, map_top]
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : TopHom β γ) (g : TopHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : TopHom β γ) (g : TopHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : TopHom γ δ) (g : TopHom β γ) (h : TopHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : TopHom α β) : f.comp (TopHom.id α) = f :=
TopHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : TopHom α β) : (TopHom.id β).comp f = f :=
TopHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : TopHom β γ} {f : TopHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => TopHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (fun g => comp g f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : TopHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : TopHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => TopHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← TopHom.comp_apply, h, TopHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Top
instance instLE [LE β] [Top β] : LE (TopHom α β) where
le f g := (f : α → β) ≤ g
instance [Preorder β] [Top β] : Preorder (TopHom α β) :=
Preorder.lift (DFunLike.coe : TopHom α β → α → β)
instance [PartialOrder β] [Top β] : PartialOrder (TopHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
section OrderTop
variable [LE β] [OrderTop β]
instance : OrderTop (TopHom α β) where
top := ⟨⊤, rfl⟩
le_top := fun _ => @le_top (α → β) _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ⇑(⊤ : TopHom α β) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (a : α) : (⊤ : TopHom α β) a = ⊤ :=
rfl
end OrderTop
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderTop β] (f g : TopHom α β)
instance : Min (TopHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f ⊓ g, by rw [Pi.inf_apply, map_top, map_top, inf_top_eq]⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (TopHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeInf _) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = ⇑f ⊓ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a :=
rfl
end SemilatticeInf
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderTop β] (f g : TopHom α β)
instance : Max (TopHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f ⊔ g, by rw [Pi.sup_apply, map_top, map_top, sup_top_eq]⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (TopHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeSup _) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = ⇑f ⊔ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
end SemilatticeSup
instance [Lattice β] [OrderTop β] : Lattice (TopHom α β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.lattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [DistribLattice β] [OrderTop β] : DistribLattice (TopHom α β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
end TopHom
/-! ### Bot homomorphisms -/
namespace BotHom
variable [Bot α]
section Bot
variable [Bot β] [Bot γ] [Bot δ]
instance : FunLike (BotHom α β) α β where
coe := BotHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : BotHomClass (BotHom α β) α β where
map_bot := BotHom.map_bot'
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections BotHom (toFun → apply)
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : BotHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `BotHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : BotHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) :
BotHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_bot' := h.symm ▸ f.map_bot'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : BotHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : BotHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
instance : Inhabited (BotHom α β) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => ⊥, rfl⟩⟩
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `BotHom`. -/
protected def id : BotHom α α :=
⟨id, rfl⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(BotHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : BotHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `BotHom`s as a `BotHom`. -/
def comp (f : BotHom β γ) (g : BotHom α β) :
BotHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_bot' := by rw [comp_apply, map_bot, map_bot]
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : BotHom β γ) (g : BotHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : BotHom β γ) (g : BotHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : BotHom γ δ) (g : BotHom β γ) (h : BotHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : BotHom α β) : f.comp (BotHom.id α) = f :=
BotHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : BotHom α β) : (BotHom.id β).comp f = f :=
BotHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : BotHom β γ} {f : BotHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => BotHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (comp · f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : BotHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : BotHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => BotHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← BotHom.comp_apply, h, BotHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Bot
instance instLE [LE β] [Bot β] : LE (BotHom α β) where
le f g := (f : α → β) ≤ g
instance [Preorder β] [Bot β] : Preorder (BotHom α β) :=
Preorder.lift (DFunLike.coe : BotHom α β → α → β)
instance [PartialOrder β] [Bot β] : PartialOrder (BotHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
section OrderBot
variable [LE β] [OrderBot β]
instance : OrderBot (BotHom α β) where
bot := ⟨⊥, rfl⟩
bot_le := fun _ => @bot_le (α → β) _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : BotHom α β) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_apply (a : α) : (⊥ : BotHom α β) a = ⊥ :=
rfl
end OrderBot
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf β] [OrderBot β] (f g : BotHom α β)
instance : Min (BotHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f ⊓ g, by rw [Pi.inf_apply, map_bot, map_bot, inf_bot_eq]⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (BotHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeInf _) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inf : ⇑(f ⊓ g) = ⇑f ⊓ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (a : α) : (f ⊓ g) a = f a ⊓ g a :=
rfl
end SemilatticeInf
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup β] [OrderBot β] (f g : BotHom α β)
instance : Max (BotHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f ⊔ g, by rw [Pi.sup_apply, map_bot, map_bot, sup_bot_eq]⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (BotHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeSup _) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup : ⇑(f ⊔ g) = ⇑f ⊔ ⇑g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
end SemilatticeSup
instance [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] : Lattice (BotHom α β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.lattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [DistribLattice β] [OrderBot β] : DistribLattice (BotHom α β) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
end BotHom
/-! ### Bounded order homomorphisms -/
-- TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
initialize_simps_projections BoundedOrderHom (+toOrderHom, -toFun)
namespace BoundedOrderHom
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β]
[BoundedOrder γ] [BoundedOrder δ]
/-- Reinterpret a `BoundedOrderHom` as a `TopHom`. -/
def toTopHom (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) : TopHom α β :=
{ f with }
/-- Reinterpret a `BoundedOrderHom` as a `BotHom`. -/
def toBotHom (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) : BotHom α β :=
{ f with }
instance : FunLike (BoundedOrderHom α β) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f; obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g; congr
instance : BoundedOrderHomClass (BoundedOrderHom α β) α β where
map_rel f := @(f.monotone')
map_top f := f.map_top'
map_bot f := f.map_bot'
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : BoundedOrderHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `BoundedOrderHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : BoundedOrderHom α β :=
{ f.toOrderHom.copy f' h, f.toTopHom.copy f' h, f.toBotHom.copy f' h with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `BoundedOrderHom`. -/
protected def id : BoundedOrderHom α α :=
{ OrderHom.id, TopHom.id α, BotHom.id α with }
instance : Inhabited (BoundedOrderHom α α) :=
⟨BoundedOrderHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(BoundedOrderHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : BoundedOrderHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `BoundedOrderHom`s as a `BoundedOrderHom`. -/
def comp (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) : BoundedOrderHom α γ :=
{ f.toOrderHom.comp g.toOrderHom, f.toTopHom.comp g.toTopHom, f.toBotHom.comp g.toBotHom with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) (a : α) :
(f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_orderHom (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) :
(f.comp g : OrderHom α γ) = (f : OrderHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_topHom (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) :
(f.comp g : TopHom α γ) = (f : TopHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_botHom (f : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (g : BoundedOrderHom α β) :
(f.comp g : BotHom α γ) = (f : BotHom β γ).comp g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : BoundedOrderHom γ δ) (g : BoundedOrderHom β γ) (h : BoundedOrderHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) : f.comp (BoundedOrderHom.id α) = f :=
BoundedOrderHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : BoundedOrderHom α β) : (BoundedOrderHom.id β).comp f = f :=
BoundedOrderHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : BoundedOrderHom β γ} {f : BoundedOrderHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => BoundedOrderHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h,
congr_arg (fun g => comp g f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : BoundedOrderHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : BoundedOrderHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
BoundedOrderHom.ext fun a =>
hg <| by rw [← BoundedOrderHom.comp_apply, h, BoundedOrderHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end BoundedOrderHom
/-! ### Dual homs -/
namespace TopHom
variable [LE α] [OrderTop α] [LE β] [OrderTop β] [LE γ] [OrderTop γ]
/-- Reinterpret a top homomorphism as a bot homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual :
TopHom α β ≃ BotHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨f, f.map_top'⟩
invFun f := ⟨f, f.map_bot'⟩
left_inv _ := TopHom.ext fun _ => rfl
right_inv _ := BotHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : TopHom.dual (TopHom.id α) = BotHom.id _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : TopHom β γ) (f : TopHom α β) :
TopHom.dual (g.comp f) = g.dual.comp (TopHom.dual f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : TopHom.dual.symm (BotHom.id _) = TopHom.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : BotHom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : BotHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
TopHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (TopHom.dual.symm g).comp (TopHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
end TopHom
namespace BotHom
variable [LE α] [OrderBot α] [LE β] [OrderBot β] [LE γ] [OrderBot γ]
/-- Reinterpret a bot homomorphism as a top homomorphism between the dual lattices. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual :
BotHom α β ≃ TopHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨f, f.map_bot'⟩
invFun f := ⟨f, f.map_top'⟩
left_inv _ := BotHom.ext fun _ => rfl
right_inv _ := TopHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : BotHom.dual (BotHom.id α) = TopHom.id _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_comp (g : BotHom β γ) (f : BotHom α β) :
BotHom.dual (g.comp f) = g.dual.comp (BotHom.dual f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_id : BotHom.dual.symm (TopHom.id _) = BotHom.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_dual_comp (g : TopHom βᵒᵈ γᵒᵈ) (f : TopHom αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ) :
BotHom.dual.symm (g.comp f) = (BotHom.dual.symm g).comp (BotHom.dual.symm f) :=
rfl
end BotHom
namespace BoundedOrderHom
variable [Preorder α] [BoundedOrder α] [Preorder β] [BoundedOrder β] [Preorder γ] [BoundedOrder γ]
/-- Reinterpret a bounded order homomorphism as a bounded order homomorphism between the dual
orders. -/
@[simps]
protected def dual :
BoundedOrderHom α β ≃
BoundedOrderHom αᵒᵈ
βᵒᵈ where
toFun f := ⟨f.toOrderHom.dual, f.map_bot', f.map_top'⟩
| invFun f := ⟨OrderHom.dual.symm f.toOrderHom, f.map_bot', f.map_top'⟩
left_inv _ := ext fun _ => rfl
right_inv _ := ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem dual_id : (BoundedOrderHom.id α).dual = BoundedOrderHom.id _ :=
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Bounded.lean | 719 | 724 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
@[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
exacts [basis_zero W, basis_one W]
variable {W} in
lemma smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) : x • y = mk W (C x) * y :=
(algebraMap_smul W.CoordinateRing x y).symm
variable {W} in
lemma smul_basis_eq_zero {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = 0) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := by
have h := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.mp (CoordinateRing.basis W).linearIndependent ![p, q]
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, basis_zero, Fin.sum_univ_one, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨h hpq 0, h hpq 1⟩
variable {W} in
lemma exists_smul_basis_eq (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
∃ p q : R[X], p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = x := by
have h := (CoordinateRing.basis W).sum_equivFun x
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_one, basis_zero, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
lemma smul_basis_mul_C (y : R[X]) (p q : R[X]) :
(p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W (C y) =
(p * y) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + (q * y) • mk W Y := by
simp only [smul, map_mul]
ring1
lemma smul_basis_mul_Y (p q : R[X]) : (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W Y =
(q * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) +
(p - q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)) • mk W Y := by
have Y_sq : mk W Y ^ 2 =
mk W (C (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) * Y) := by
exact AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [polynomial]; ring1⟩
simp only [smul, add_mul, mul_assoc, ← sq, Y_sq, C_sub, map_sub, C_mul, map_mul]
ring1
/-- The ring homomorphism `R[W] →+* S[W.map f]` induced by a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`. -/
noncomputable def map : W.CoordinateRing →+* (W.map f).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.lift ((AdjoinRoot.of _).comp <| mapRingHom f)
((AdjoinRoot.root (WeierstrassCurve.map W f).toAffine.polynomial)) <| by
rw [← eval₂_map, ← map_polynomial, AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root]
lemma map_mk (x : R[X][Y]) : map W f (mk W x) = mk (W.map f) (x.map <| mapRingHom f) := by
rw [map, AdjoinRoot.lift_mk, ← eval₂_map]
exact AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq <| x.map <| mapRingHom f
variable {W} in
protected lemma map_smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) :
map W f (x • y) = x.map f • map W f y := by
rw [smul, map_mul, map_mk, map_C, smul]
rfl
variable {f} in
lemma map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective <| map W f :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun y hy => by
obtain ⟨p, q, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_basis_eq y
simp_rw [map_add, CoordinateRing.map_smul, map_one, map_mk, map_X] at hy
obtain ⟨hp, hq⟩ := smul_basis_eq_zero hy
rw [Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf] at hp hq
simp_rw [hp, hq, zero_smul, add_zero]
instance [IsDomain R] : IsDomain W.CoordinateRing :=
have : IsDomain (W.map <| algebraMap R <| FractionRing R).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.isDomain_of_prime irreducible_polynomial.prime
(map_injective W <| IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R).isDomain
end Algebra
section Ring
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a ring -/
/-- The class of the element `X - x` in `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XClass (x : R) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| C <| X - C x
lemma XClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (x : R) : XClass W x ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (C_ne_zero.mpr <| X_sub_C_ne_zero x) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_C]; norm_num1
/-- The class of the element `Y - y(X)` in `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YClass (y : R[X]) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| Y - C y
lemma YClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (y : R[X]) : YClass W y ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (X_sub_C_ne_zero y) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_X_sub_C]; norm_num1
lemma C_addPolynomial (x y L : R) : mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x y L) =
mk W ((Y - C (linePolynomial x y L)) * (W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x y L))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [W.C_addPolynomial, add_sub_cancel_left, mul_one]⟩
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XIdeal (x : R) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x}
/-- The ideal `⟨Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YIdeal (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {YClass W y}
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R` and `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal (x : R) (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x, YClass W y}
lemma XYIdeal_eq₁ (x y L : R) : XYIdeal W x (C y) = XYIdeal W x (linePolynomial x y L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -L, ← map_mul, ← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_add_eq (x₁ x₂ y₁ L : R) : XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) (C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ L) =
span {mk W <| W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ L)} ⊔ XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XIdeal, XClass, YClass, addY, negAddY, negY, negPolynomial, linePolynomial]
rw [sub_sub <| -(Y : R[X][Y]), neg_sub_left (Y : R[X][Y]), map_neg, span_singleton_neg, sup_comm,
← span_insert, ← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| W.a₁ + L, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
/-- The `R`-algebra isomorphism from `R[W] / ⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` to `R` obtained by evaluation at
some `y(X)` in `R[X]` and at some `x` in `R` provided that `W(x, y(x)) = 0`. -/
noncomputable def quotientXYIdealEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} (h : (W.polynomial.eval y).eval x = 0) :
(W.CoordinateRing ⧸ XYIdeal W x y) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
((quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, ← Set.image_pair, ← map_span]; rfl).trans <|
DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLEₐ R <| (span_singleton_le_iff_mem _).mpr <|
mem_span_C_X_sub_C_X_sub_C_iff_eval_eval_eq_zero.mpr h).trans
quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv
end Ring
section Field
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a field -/
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {W : Affine F}
lemma C_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-(XClass W x₁ * XClass W x₂ * XClass W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)) :=
congr_arg (mk W) <| W.C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy
lemma XYIdeal_eq₂ {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂) = XYIdeal W x₂ (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have hy₂ : y₂ = (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂).eval x₂ := by
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
field_simp [linePolynomial, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy]
· field_simp [linePolynomial, slope_of_X_ne hx, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx]
ring1
nth_rw 1 [hy₂]
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) * XYIdeal W x (C y) = XIdeal W x := by
have Y_rw : (Y - C (C y)) * (Y - C (C <| W.negY x y)) -
C (X - C x) * (C (X ^ 2 + C (x + W.a₂) * X + C (x ^ 2 + W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)) - C (C W.a₁) * Y) =
W.polynomial * 1 := by
linear_combination (norm := (rw [negY, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1))
congr_arg C (congr_arg C ((equation_iff ..).mp h.left).symm)
simp_rw [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, span_pair_mul_span_pair, mul_comm, ← map_mul,
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, Y_rw⟩, map_mul, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup, ← span_insert]
convert mul_top (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing) using 2
simp_rw [← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← Set.image_insert_eq, ← map_span]
convert map_top (R := F[X][Y]) (mk W) using 1
apply congr_arg
simp_rw [eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_insert', mem_span_singleton']
rcases ((nonsingular_iff' ..).mp h).right with hx | hy
· let W_X := W.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)
refine
⟨C <| C W_X⁻¹ * -(X + C (2 * x + W.a₂)), C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * W.a₁, 0, C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * -1, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [W_X, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
· let W_Y := 2 * y + W.a₁ * x + W.a₃
refine ⟨0, C <| C W_Y⁻¹, C <| C <| W_Y⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩
rw [negY, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hy]
simp only [W_Y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy]
C_simp
ring1
private lemma XYIdeal'_mul_inv {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C y) * (XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) *
(XIdeal W x : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul, mul_comm <| XYIdeal W .., XYIdeal_neg_mul h,
XIdeal, FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv W.FunctionField <| XClass_ne_zero W x]
lemma XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) * (XYIdeal W x₁ (C y₁) * XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂)) =
YIdeal W (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) *
XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
(C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have sup_rw : ∀ a b c d : Ideal W.CoordinateRing, a ⊔ (b ⊔ (c ⊔ d)) = a ⊔ d ⊔ b ⊔ c :=
fun _ _ c _ => by rw [← sup_assoc, sup_comm c, sup_sup_sup_comm, ← sup_assoc]
rw [XYIdeal_add_eq, XIdeal, mul_comm, XYIdeal_eq₁ W x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, XYIdeal,
XYIdeal_eq₂ h₁ h₂ hxy, XYIdeal, span_pair_mul_span_pair]
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_rw, Ideal.sup_mul, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr <| C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy, span_singleton_neg,
C_addPolynomial, map_mul, YClass]
simp_rw [mul_comm <| XClass W x₁, mul_assoc, ← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup]
rw [span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← span_insert,
← span_pair_add_mul_right <| -(XClass W <| W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂), mul_neg,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_mul, ← map_sub <| mk W, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← sup_rw, ← Ideal.sup_mul, ← Ideal.sup_mul]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _)
convert top_mul (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing)
simp_rw [XClass, ← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← map_span, ← Ideal.map_sup, eq_top_iff_one,
mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ AdjoinRoot.mk_surjective, ← span_insert, mem_span_insert',
mem_span_singleton']
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
let y := (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) ^ 2
replace hxy := pow_ne_zero 2 <| sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy
refine ⟨1 + C (C <| y⁻¹ * 4) * W.polynomial,
⟨C <| C y⁻¹ * (C 4 * X ^ 2 + C (4 * x₁ + W.b₂) * X + C (4 * x₁ ^ 2 + W.b₂ * x₁ + 2 * W.b₄)),
0, C (C y⁻¹) * (Y - W.negPolynomial), ?_⟩, by
rw [map_add, map_one, map_mul <| mk W, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
rw [polynomial, negPolynomial, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hxy]
simp only [y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hxy]
linear_combination (norm := (rw [b₂, b₄, negY]; C_simp; ring1))
-4 * congr_arg C (congr_arg C <| (equation_iff ..).mp h₁)
· replace hx := sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨C <| C (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹, C <| C <| (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩, map_one _⟩⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
/-- The non-zero fractional ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩` of `F(W)` for some `x` and `y` in `F`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal' {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)ˣ :=
Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ <| XYIdeal'_mul_inv h
lemma XYIdeal'_eq {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(XYIdeal' h : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField) = XYIdeal W x (C y) :=
rfl
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| (nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h) = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_one_of_coe_ideal <| (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm.trans <|
FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj.mpr <| XYIdeal_neg_mul h).mpr ⟨_, XClass_ne_zero W _, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal'_of_Yeq :=
mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₁) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₂) =
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy) := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm <|
XYIdeal'_eq _).mpr
⟨_, _, XClass_ne_zero W _, YClass_ne_zero W _, XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal h₁.left h₂.left hxy⟩
end Field
section Norm
/-! ### Norms on the coordinate ring -/
lemma norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
p ^ 2 - p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) -
q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) := by
simp_rw [Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det <| CoordinateRing.basis W, Matrix.det_fin_two,
Algebra.leftMulMatrix_eq_repr_mul, basis_zero, mul_one, basis_one, smul_basis_mul_Y, map_add,
Finsupp.add_apply, map_smul, Finsupp.smul_apply, ← basis_zero, ← basis_one,
Basis.repr_self_apply, if_pos, one_ne_zero, if_false, smul_eq_mul]
ring1
lemma coe_norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
mk W ((C p + C q * X) * (C p + C q * (-(Y : R[X][Y]) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr
⟨C q ^ 2, by simp only [norm_smul_basis, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1⟩
lemma degree_norm_smul_basis [IsDomain R] (p q : R[X]) :
(Algebra.norm R[X] <| p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y).degree =
max (2 • p.degree) (2 • q.degree + 3) := by
have hdp : (p ^ 2).degree = 2 • p.degree := degree_pow p 2
have hdpq : (p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)).degree ≤ p.degree + q.degree + 1 := by
simpa only [degree_mul] using add_le_add_left degree_linear_le (p.degree + q.degree)
have hdq :
(q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)).degree = 2 • q.degree + 3 := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_pow, ← one_mul <| X ^ 3, ← C_1, degree_cubic <| one_ne_zero' R]
rw [norm_smul_basis]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simpa only [hp, hdq, neg_zero, zero_sub, zero_mul, zero_pow two_ne_zero, degree_neg] using
(max_bot_left _).symm
· by_cases hq : q = 0
· simpa only [hq, hdp, sub_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero] using
(max_bot_right _).symm
· rw [← not_congr degree_eq_bot] at hp hq
-- Porting note: BUG `cases` tactic does not modify assumptions in `hp'` and `hq'`
rcases hp' : p.degree with _ | dp -- `hp' : ` should be redundant
· exact (hp hp').elim -- `hp'` should be `rfl`
· rw [hp'] at hdp hdpq -- line should be redundant
rcases hq' : q.degree with _ | dq -- `hq' : ` should be redundant
· exact (hq hq').elim -- `hq'` should be `rfl`
· rw [hq'] at hdpq hdq -- line should be redundant
rcases le_or_lt dp (dq + 1) with hpq | hpq
· convert (degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt <| (degree_sub_le _ _).trans_lt <|
max_lt_iff.mpr ⟨hdp.trans_lt _, hdpq.trans_lt _⟩).trans
(max_eq_right_of_lt _).symm <;> rw [hdq] <;>
exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| by dsimp; linarith only [hpq]
· rw [sub_sub]
convert (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| (degree_add_le _ _).trans_lt <|
max_lt_iff.mpr ⟨hdpq.trans_lt _, hdq.trans_lt _⟩).trans
(max_eq_left_of_lt _).symm <;> rw [hdp] <;>
exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| by dsimp; linarith only [hpq]
variable {W} in
lemma degree_norm_ne_one [IsDomain R] (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
(Algebra.norm R[X] x).degree ≠ 1 := by
rcases exists_smul_basis_eq x with ⟨p, q, rfl⟩
rw [degree_norm_smul_basis]
rcases p.degree with (_ | _ | _ | _) <;> cases q.degree
any_goals rintro (_ | _)
-- Porting note: replaced `dec_trivial` with `by exact (cmp_eq_lt_iff ..).mp rfl`
exact (lt_max_of_lt_right <| by exact (cmp_eq_lt_iff ..).mp rfl).ne'
variable {W} in
lemma natDegree_norm_ne_one [IsDomain R] (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
(Algebra.norm R[X] x).natDegree ≠ 1 :=
degree_norm_ne_one x ∘ (degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one).mpr
end Norm
|
end CoordinateRing
namespace Point
/-! ### The axioms for nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve -/
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {W : Affine F}
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 479 | 487 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,192 | 1,195 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_right.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_right : b ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, le_symmDiff_iff_left, disjoint_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_left :
a ∆ b ∆ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ b \ c ⊔ c \ a ∆ b := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ (c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ c ⊓ a ⊓ b) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (c ⊓ a ⊓ b), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ b ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c \ a := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ (b \ (c ⊔ a) ⊔ c \ (b ⊔ a)) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (a ⊓ b ⊓ c), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_assoc : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ (b ∆ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_symmDiff_left, symmDiff_symmDiff_right]
instance symmDiff_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_assoc⟩
theorem symmDiff_left_comm : a ∆ (b ∆ c) = b ∆ (a ∆ c) := by
simp_rw [← symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_right_comm : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ c ∆ b := by simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b ∆ (c ∆ d) = a ∆ c ∆ (b ∆ d) := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left : a ∆ (a ∆ b) = b := by simp [← symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right : b ∆ a ∆ a = b := by simp [symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_self' : a ∆ b ∆ a = b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left]
theorem symmDiff_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ∆ a) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right _
theorem symmDiff_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ∆ ·) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left _
theorem symmDiff_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_left_involutive a)
theorem symmDiff_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_left_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_right_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
variable {a b c}
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_left_inj : a ∆ b = c ∆ b ↔ a = c :=
(symmDiff_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_right_inj : a ∆ b = a ∆ c ↔ b = c :=
(symmDiff_right_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_left : a ∆ b = a ↔ b = ⊥ :=
calc
a ∆ b = a ↔ a ∆ b = a ∆ ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_bot]
_ ↔ b = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_right : a ∆ b = b ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_eq_left]
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_left (ha : Disjoint a c) (hb : Disjoint b c) :
Disjoint (a ∆ b) c := by
| rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact (ha.sup_left hb).disjoint_sdiff_left
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_right (ha : Disjoint a b) (hb : Disjoint a c) :
Disjoint a (b ∆ c) :=
(ha.symm.symmDiff_left hb.symm).symm
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 461 | 467 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Set
/-!
# Ends
This file contains a definition of the ends of a simple graph, as sections of the inverse system
assigning, to each finite set of vertices, the connected components of its complement.
-/
universe u
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) (K L M : Set V)
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- The components outside a given set of vertices `K` -/
abbrev ComponentCompl :=
(G.induce Kᶜ).ConnectedComponent
variable {G} {K L M}
/-- The connected component of `v` in `G.induce Kᶜ`. -/
abbrev componentComplMk (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
connectedComponentMk (G.induce Kᶜ) ⟨v, vK⟩
/-- The set of vertices of `G` making up the connected component `C` -/
def ComponentCompl.supp (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Set V :=
{ v : V | ∃ h : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk h = C }
@[ext]
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_injective :
Function.Injective (ComponentCompl.supp : G.ComponentCompl K → Set V) := by
refine ConnectedComponent.ind₂ ?_
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ h
simp only [Set.ext_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ComponentCompl.supp] at h ⊢
exact ((h v).mp ⟨hv, Reachable.refl _⟩).choose_spec
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : C.supp = D.supp ↔ C = D :=
ComponentCompl.supp_injective.eq_iff
instance ComponentCompl.setLike : SetLike (G.ComponentCompl K) V where
coe := ComponentCompl.supp
coe_injective' _ _ := ComponentCompl.supp_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem ComponentCompl.mem_supp_iff {v : V} {C : ComponentCompl G K} :
v ∈ C ↔ ∃ vK : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk vK = C :=
Iff.rfl
theorem componentComplMk_mem (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : v ∈ G.componentComplMk vK :=
⟨vK, rfl⟩
theorem componentComplMk_eq_of_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (wK : w ∉ K)
(a : G.Adj v w) : G.componentComplMk vK = G.componentComplMk wK := by
rw [ConnectedComponent.eq]
apply Adj.reachable
exact a
/-- In an infinite graph, the set of components out of a finite set is nonempty. -/
instance componentCompl_nonempty_of_infinite (G : SimpleGraph V) [Infinite V] (K : Finset V) :
Nonempty (G.ComponentCompl K) :=
let ⟨_, kK⟩ := K.finite_toSet.infinite_compl.nonempty
⟨componentComplMk _ kK⟩
namespace ComponentCompl
/-- A `ComponentCompl` specialization of `Quot.lift`, where soundness has to be proved only
for adjacent vertices.
-/
protected def lift {β : Sort*} (f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (_ : v ∉ K), β)
(h : ∀ ⦃v w⦄ (hv : v ∉ K) (hw : w ∉ K), G.Adj v w → f hv = f hw) : G.ComponentCompl K → β :=
ConnectedComponent.lift (fun vv => f vv.prop) fun v w p => by
induction p with
| nil => rintro _; rfl
| cons a q ih => rename_i u v w; rintro h'; exact (h u.prop v.prop a).trans (ih h'.of_cons)
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind {β : G.ComponentCompl K → Prop}
(f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (hv : v ∉ K), β (G.componentComplMk hv)) : ∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, β C := by
apply ConnectedComponent.ind
exact fun ⟨v, vnK⟩ => f vnK
/-- The induced graph on the vertices `C`. -/
protected abbrev coeGraph (C : ComponentCompl G K) : SimpleGraph C :=
G.induce (C : Set V)
theorem coe_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : (C : Set V) = (D : Set V) ↔ C = D :=
SetLike.coe_set_eq
@[simp]
protected theorem nonempty (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : (C : Set V).Nonempty :=
C.ind fun v vnK => ⟨v, vnK, rfl⟩
protected theorem exists_eq_mk (C : G.ComponentCompl K) :
∃ (v : _) (h : v ∉ K), G.componentComplMk h = C :=
C.nonempty
protected theorem disjoint_right (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Disjoint K C := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun v ⟨vK, vC⟩ => vC.choose vK
theorem not_mem_of_mem {C : G.ComponentCompl K} {c : V} (cC : c ∈ C) : c ∉ K := fun cK =>
Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right ⟨cK, cC⟩
protected theorem pairwise_disjoint :
Pairwise fun C D : G.ComponentCompl K => Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rintro C D ne
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun u ⟨uC, uD⟩ => ne (uC.choose_spec.symm.trans uD.choose_spec)
/-- Any vertex adjacent to a vertex of `C` and not lying in `K` must lie in `C`.
-/
theorem mem_of_adj : ∀ {C : G.ComponentCompl K} (c d : V), c ∈ C → d ∉ K → G.Adj c d → d ∈ C :=
fun {C} c d ⟨cnK, h⟩ dnK cd =>
⟨dnK, by
rw [← h, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact Adj.reachable cd.symm⟩
/--
Assuming `G` is preconnected and `K` not empty, given any connected component `C` outside of `K`,
there exists a vertex `k ∈ K` adjacent to a vertex `v ∈ C`.
-/
theorem exists_adj_boundary_pair (Gc : G.Preconnected) (hK : K.Nonempty) :
∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, ∃ ck : V × V, ck.1 ∈ C ∧ ck.2 ∈ K ∧ G.Adj ck.1 ck.2 := by
refine ComponentCompl.ind fun v vnK => ?_
let C : G.ComponentCompl K := G.componentComplMk vnK
let dis := Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right
by_contra! h
suffices Set.univ = (C : Set V) by exact dis ⟨hK.choose_spec, this ▸ Set.mem_univ hK.some⟩
symm
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rintro u
by_contra unC
obtain ⟨p⟩ := Gc v u
obtain ⟨⟨⟨x, y⟩, xy⟩, -, xC, ynC⟩ :=
p.exists_boundary_dart (C : Set V) (G.componentComplMk_mem vnK) unC
exact ynC (mem_of_adj x y xC (fun yK : y ∈ K => h ⟨x, y⟩ xC yK xy) xy)
/--
If `K ⊆ L`, the components outside of `L` are all contained in a single component outside of `K`.
-/
abbrev hom (h : K ⊆ L) (C : G.ComponentCompl L) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
C.map <| induceHom Hom.id <| Set.compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_hom (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) : (C : Set V) ⊆ (C.hom h : Set V) := by
rintro c ⟨cL, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun h' => cL (h h'), rfl⟩
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.componentComplMk_mem_hom
(G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (h : L ⊆ K) :
v ∈ (G.componentComplMk vK).hom h :=
subset_hom (G.componentComplMk vK) h (G.componentComplMk_mem vK)
theorem hom_eq_iff_le (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ (C : Set V) ⊆ (D : Set V) :=
⟨fun h' => h' ▸ C.subset_hom h, C.ind fun _ vnL vD => (vD ⟨vnL, rfl⟩).choose_spec⟩
theorem hom_eq_iff_not_disjoint (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ ¬Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine C.ind fun x xnL => ?_
exact ⟨x, ⟨xnL, rfl⟩, ⟨fun xK => xnL (h xK), rfl⟩⟩
· refine C.ind fun x xnL => ?_
rintro ⟨x, ⟨_, e₁⟩, _, rfl⟩
rw [← e₁]
rfl
theorem hom_refl (C : G.ComponentCompl L) : C.hom (subset_refl L) = C := by
change C.map _ = C
rw [induceHom_id G Lᶜ, ConnectedComponent.map_id]
theorem hom_trans (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (h' : M ⊆ K) :
C.hom (h'.trans h) = (C.hom h).hom h' := by
change C.map _ = (C.map _).map _
rw [ConnectedComponent.map_comp, induceHom_comp]
rfl
theorem hom_mk {v : V} (vnL : v ∉ L) (h : K ⊆ L) :
(G.componentComplMk vnL).hom h = G.componentComplMk (Set.not_mem_subset h vnL) :=
rfl
theorem hom_infinite (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (Cinf : (C : Set V).Infinite) :
(C.hom h : Set V).Infinite :=
| Set.Infinite.mono (C.subset_hom h) Cinf
theorem infinite_iff_in_all_ranges {K : Finset V} (C : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.supp.Infinite ↔ ∀ (L) (h : K ⊆ L), ∃ D : G.ComponentCompl L, D.hom h = C := by
classical
constructor
· rintro Cinf L h
obtain ⟨v, ⟨vK, rfl⟩, vL⟩ := Set.Infinite.nonempty (Set.Infinite.diff Cinf L.finite_toSet)
exact ⟨componentComplMk _ vL, rfl⟩
· rintro h Cfin
obtain ⟨D, e⟩ := h (K ∪ Cfin.toFinset) Finset.subset_union_left
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Ends/Defs.lean | 194 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.MeasurableEquiv
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Regular measures
A measure is `OuterRegular` if the measure of any measurable set `A` is the infimum of `μ U` over
all open sets `U` containing `A`.
A measure is `WeaklyRegular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to closed sets: the measure of any open set `U`
is the supremum of `μ F` over all closed sets `F` contained in `U`.
A measure is `Regular` if it satisfies the following properties:
* it is finite on compact sets;
* it is outer regular;
* it is inner regular for open sets with respect to compacts closed sets: the measure of any open
set `U` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact sets `K` contained in `U`.
A measure is `InnerRegular` if it is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact
sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum of `μ K` over all compact
sets contained in `s`.
A measure is `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` if it is inner regular for measurable sets of finite
measure with respect to compact sets: the measure of any measurable set `s` is the supremum
of `μ K` over all compact sets contained in `s`.
There is a reason for this zoo of regularity classes:
* A finite measure on a metric space is always weakly regular. Therefore, in probability theory,
weakly regular measures play a prominent role.
* In locally compact topological spaces, there are two competing notions of Radon measures: the
ones that are regular, and the ones that are inner regular. For any of these two notions, there is
a Riesz representation theorem, and an existence and uniqueness statement for the Haar measure in
locally compact topological groups. The two notions coincide in sigma-compact spaces, but they
differ in general, so it is worth having the two of them.
* Both notions of Haar measure satisfy the weaker notion `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`, so it is worth
trying to express theorems using this weaker notion whenever possible, to make sure that it
applies to both Haar measures simultaneously.
While traditional textbooks on measure theory on locally compact spaces emphasize regular measures,
more recent textbooks emphasize that inner regular Haar measures are better behaved than regular
Haar measures, so we will develop both notions.
The five conditions above are registered as typeclasses for a measure `μ`, and implications between
them are recorded as instances. For example, in a Hausdorff topological space, regularity implies
weak regularity. Also, regularity or inner regularity both imply `InnerRegularCompactLTTop`.
In a regular locally compact finite measure space, then regularity, inner regularity
and `InnerRegularCompactLTTop` are all equivalent.
In order to avoid code duplication, we also define a measure `μ` to be `InnerRegularWRT` for sets
satisfying a predicate `q` with respect to sets satisfying a predicate `p` if for any set
`U ∈ {U | q U}` and a number `r < μ U` there exists `F ⊆ U` such that `p F` and `r < μ F`.
There are two main nontrivial results in the development below:
* `InnerRegularWRT.measurableSet_of_isOpen` shows that, for an outer regular measure, inner
regularity for open sets with respect to compact sets or closed sets implies inner regularity for
all measurable sets of finite measure (with respect to compact sets or closed sets respectively).
* `InnerRegularWRT.weaklyRegular_of_finite` shows that a finite measure which is inner regular for
open sets with respect to closed sets (for instance a finite measure on a metric space) is weakly
regular.
All other results are deduced from these ones.
Here is an example showing how regularity and inner regularity may differ even on locally compact
spaces. Consider the group `ℝ × ℝ` where the first factor has the discrete topology and the second
one the usual topology. It is a locally compact Hausdorff topological group, with Haar measure equal
to Lebesgue measure on each vertical fiber. Let us consider the regular version of Haar measure.
Then the set `ℝ × {0}` has infinite measure (by outer regularity), but any compact set it contains
has zero measure (as it is finite). In fact, this set only contains subset with measure zero or
infinity. The inner regular version of Haar measure, on the other hand, gives zero mass to the
set `ℝ × {0}`.
Another interesting example is the sum of the Dirac masses at rational points in the real line.
It is a σ-finite measure on a locally compact metric space, but it is not outer regular: for
outer regularity, one needs additional locally finite assumptions. On the other hand, it is
inner regular.
Several authors require both regularity and inner regularity for their measures. We have opted
for the more fine grained definitions above as they apply more generally.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is outer regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a topological
space is regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is weakly regular.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT μ p q`: a non-typeclass predicate saying that a measure `μ`
is inner regular for sets satisfying `q` with respect to sets satisfying `p`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ` on a
topological space is inner regular for measurable sets with respect to compact sets.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ`: a typeclass registering that a measure `μ`
on a topological space is inner regular for measurable sets of finite measure with respect to
compact sets.
## Main results
### Outer regular measures
* `Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, the measure of a
set is the infimum of the measure of open sets containing it.
* `Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt` asserts that, when `μ` is outer regular, for every set `s`
and `r > μ s` there exists an open superset `U ⊇ s` of measure less than `r`.
* push forward of an outer regular measure is outer regular, and scalar multiplication of a regular
measure by a finite number is outer regular.
### Weakly regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isClosed`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a closed `F ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isClosed_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of closed sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isClosed_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isClosed_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a closed subset (stated as
`r < μ F` and `μ s < μ F + ε`, respectively).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_of_isFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a finite measure on a metric space is weakly regular (in fact, a pseudo
metrizable space is enough);
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.of_pseudoMetrizableSpace_secondCountable_of_locallyFinite`
is an instance registering that a locally finite measure on a second countable metric space (or
even a pseudo metrizable space) is weakly regular.
### Regular measures
* `IsOpen.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of an open set is the supremum of
the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `IsOpen.exists_lt_isCompact`: for an open set `U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a compact `K ⊆ U`
of measure greater than `r`;
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular.of_sigmaCompactSpace_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure` is an
instance registering that a locally finite measure on a `σ`-compact metric space is regular (in
fact, an emetric space is enough).
### Inner regular measures
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact` asserts that the measure of a measurable set is the
supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact`: for a measurable set `s` and `r < μ s`, there exists a
compact `K ⊆ s` of measure greater than `r`;
### Inner regular measures for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets
* `MeasurableSet.measure_eq_iSup_isCompact_of_ne_top` asserts that the measure of a measurable set
of finite measure is the supremum of the measure of compact sets it contains.
* `MeasurableSet.exists_lt_isCompact_of_ne_top` and `MeasurableSet.exists_isCompact_lt_add`:
a measurable set of finite measure can be approximated by a compact subset (stated as
`r < μ K` and `μ s < μ K + ε`, respectively).
## Implementation notes
The main nontrivial statement is `MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegular.weaklyRegular_of_finite`,
expressing that in a finite measure space, if every open set can be approximated from inside by
closed sets, then the measure is in fact weakly regular. To prove that we show that any measurable
set can be approximated from inside by closed sets and from outside by open sets. This statement is
proved by measurable induction, starting from open sets and checking that it is stable by taking
complements (this is the point of this condition, being symmetrical between inside and outside) and
countable disjoint unions.
Once this statement is proved, one deduces results for `σ`-finite measures from this statement, by
restricting them to finite measure sets (and proving that this restriction is weakly regular, using
again the same statement).
For non-Hausdorff spaces, one may argue whether the right condition for inner regularity is with
respect to compact sets, or to compact closed sets. For instance,
[Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 4, 411J)][fremlin_vol4] considers measures which are inner
regular with respect to compact closed sets (and calls them *tight*). However, since most of the
literature uses mere compact sets, we have chosen to follow this convention. It doesn't make a
difference in Hausdorff spaces, of course. In locally compact topological groups, the two
conditions coincide, since if a compact set `k` is contained in a measurable set `u`, then the
closure of `k` is a compact closed set still contained in `u`, see
`IsCompact.closure_subset_of_measurableSet_of_group`.
## References
[Halmos, Measure Theory, §52][halmos1950measure]. Note that Halmos uses an unusual definition of
Borel sets (for him, they are elements of the `σ`-algebra generated by compact sets!), so his
proofs or statements do not apply directly.
[Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures][billingsley1999]
[Bogachev, Measure Theory, volume 2, Theorem 7.11.1][bogachev2007]
-/
open Set Filter ENNReal NNReal TopologicalSpace
open scoped symmDiff Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- We say that a measure `μ` is *inner regular* with respect to predicates `p q : Set α → Prop`,
if for every `U` such that `q U` and `r < μ U`, there exists a subset `K ⊆ U` satisfying `p K`
of measure greater than `r`.
This definition is used to prove some facts about regular and weakly regular measures without
repeating the proofs. -/
def InnerRegularWRT {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (p q : Set α → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃U⦄, q U → ∀ r < μ U, ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ r < μ K
namespace InnerRegularWRT
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {p q : Set α → Prop} {U : Set α}
{ε : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem measure_eq_iSup (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (hU : q U) :
μ U = ⨆ (K) (_ : K ⊆ U) (_ : p K), μ K := by
refine
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun r hr => ?_) (iSup₂_le fun K hK => iSup_le fun _ => μ.mono hK)
simpa only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using H hU r hr
theorem exists_subset_lt_add (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (h0 : p ∅) (hU : q U) (hμU : μ U ≠ ∞)
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ μ U < μ K + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ U) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· refine ⟨∅, empty_subset _, h0, ?_⟩
rwa [measure_empty, h₀, zero_add, pos_iff_ne_zero]
· rcases H hU _ (ENNReal.sub_lt_self hμU h₀ hε) with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKU, hKc, ENNReal.lt_add_of_sub_lt_right (Or.inl hμU) hrK⟩
protected theorem map {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
{μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K))
(hB₂ : ∀ U, qb U → MeasurableSet U) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf (hB₂ _ hU)] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
exact hK.trans_le (le_map_apply_image hf _)
theorem map' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {pa qa : Set α → Prop}
(H : InnerRegularWRT μ pa qa) (f : α ≃ᵐ β) {pb qb : Set β → Prop}
(hAB : ∀ U, qb U → qa (f ⁻¹' U)) (hAB' : ∀ K, pa K → pb (f '' K)) :
InnerRegularWRT (map f μ) pb qb := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [f.map_apply U] at hr
rcases H (hAB U hU) r hr with ⟨K, hKU, hKc, hK⟩
refine ⟨f '' K, image_subset_iff.2 hKU, hAB' _ hKc, ?_⟩
rwa [f.map_apply, f.preimage_image]
theorem smul (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : InnerRegularWRT (c • μ) p q := by
intro U hU r hr
rw [smul_apply, H.measure_eq_iSup hU, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iSup, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using hr
theorem trans {q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q) (H' : InnerRegularWRT μ q q') :
InnerRegularWRT μ p q' := by
intro U hU r hr
rcases H' hU r hr with ⟨F, hFU, hqF, hF⟩; rcases H hqF _ hF with ⟨K, hKF, hpK, hrK⟩
exact ⟨K, hKF.trans hFU, hpK, hrK⟩
theorem rfl {p : Set α → Prop} : InnerRegularWRT μ p p :=
fun U hU _r hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, hU, hr⟩
theorem of_imp (h : ∀ s, q s → p s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p q :=
fun U hU _ hr ↦ ⟨U, Subset.rfl, h U hU, hr⟩
theorem mono {p' q' : Set α → Prop} (H : InnerRegularWRT μ p q)
(h : ∀ s, q' s → q s) (h' : ∀ s, p s → p' s) : InnerRegularWRT μ p' q' :=
of_imp h' |>.trans H |>.trans (of_imp h)
end InnerRegularWRT
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
section Classes
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- A measure `μ` is outer regular if `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for a measurable set `A`.
This definition implies the same equality for any (not necessarily measurable) set, see
`Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen`. -/
class OuterRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected outerRegular :
∀ ⦃A : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet A → ∀ r > μ A, ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r
/-- A measure `μ` is regular if
- it is finite on all compact sets;
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using compact sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ U compact}` for `U` open. -/
class Regular (μ : Measure α) : Prop extends IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ, OuterRegular μ where
innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsOpen
/-- A measure `μ` is weakly regular if
- it is outer regular: `μ(A) = inf {μ(U) | A ⊆ U open}` for `A` measurable;
- it is inner regular for open sets, using closed sets:
`μ(U) = sup {μ(F) | F ⊆ U closed}` for `U` open. -/
class WeaklyRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop extends OuterRegular μ where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular if, for any measurable set `s`, then
`μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`. -/
class InnerRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact MeasurableSet
/-- A measure `μ` is inner regular for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets:
for any measurable set `s` with finite measure, then `μ(s) = sup {μ(K) | K ⊆ s compact}`.
The main interest of this class is that it is satisfied for both natural Haar measures (the
regular one and the inner regular one). -/
class InnerRegularCompactLTTop (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A regular measure is weakly regular in an R₁ space. -/
instance (priority := 100) Regular.weaklyRegular [R1Space α] [Regular μ] :
WeaklyRegular μ where
innerRegular := fun _U hU r hr ↦
let ⟨K, KU, K_comp, hK⟩ := Regular.innerRegular hU r hr
⟨closure K, K_comp.closure_subset_of_isOpen hU KU, isClosed_closure,
hK.trans_le (measure_mono subset_closure)⟩
end Classes
namespace OuterRegular
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
instance zero : OuterRegular (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨fun A _ _r hr => ⟨univ, subset_univ A, isOpen_univ, hr⟩⟩
/-- Given `r` larger than the measure of a set `A`, there exists an open superset of `A` with
measure less than `r`. -/
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : μ A < r) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r := by
rcases OuterRegular.outerRegular (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ A) r
(by rwa [measure_toMeasurable]) with
⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, (subset_toMeasurable _ _).trans hAU, hUo, hU⟩
/-- For an outer regular measure, the measure of a set is the infimum of the measures of open sets
containing it. -/
theorem _root_.Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
μ A = ⨅ (U : Set α) (_ : A ⊆ U) (_ : IsOpen U), μ U := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun s hs => le_iInf fun _ => μ.mono hs) ?_
refine le_of_forall_lt' fun r hr => ?_
simpa only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt r hr
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (hA : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ A + ε :=
A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ (ENNReal.lt_add_right hA hε)
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_le_add (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ A + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ A) ∞ with (H | H)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, isOpen_univ, by simp only [H, _root_.top_add, le_top]⟩
· rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add H hε with ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU.le⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt [OuterRegular μ] {A : Set α}
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hA' : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ A) < ε := by
rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add hA' hε with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
use U, hAU, hUo, hU.trans_le le_top
exact measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hA.nullMeasurableSet hAU hA' hU
protected theorem map [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (f : α ≃ₜ β) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
(Measure.map f μ).OuterRegular := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply f.measurable hA, ← f.image_symm] at hr
rcases Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ r hr with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
have : IsOpen (f.symm ⁻¹' U) := hUo.preimage f.symm.continuous
refine ⟨f.symm ⁻¹' U, image_subset_iff.1 hAU, this, ?_⟩
rwa [map_apply f.measurable this.measurableSet, f.preimage_symm, f.preimage_image]
protected theorem smul (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {x : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ∞) :
(x • μ).OuterRegular := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h0)
· rw [zero_smul]
exact OuterRegular.zero
· refine ⟨fun A _ r hr => ?_⟩
rw [smul_apply, A.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen, smul_eq_mul] at hr
simpa only [ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne h0 hx, gt_iff_lt, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using hr
instance smul_nnreal (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] (c : ℝ≥0) :
OuterRegular (c • μ) :=
OuterRegular.smul μ coe_ne_top
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If the restrictions of a measure to countably many open sets covering the space are
outer regular, then the measure itself is outer regular. -/
lemma of_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : ℕ → Set α}
(h : ∀ n, OuterRegular (μ.restrict (s n))) (h' : ∀ n, IsOpen (s n)) (h'' : univ ⊆ ⋃ n, s n) :
OuterRegular μ := by
refine ⟨fun A hA r hr => ?_⟩
have HA : μ A < ∞ := lt_of_lt_of_le hr le_top
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n) := fun n => (h' n).measurableSet
-- Note that `A = ⋃ n, A ∩ disjointed s n`. We replace `A` with this sequence.
obtain ⟨A, hAm, hAs, hAd, rfl⟩ :
∃ A' : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (A' n)) ∧
(∀ n, A' n ⊆ s n) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on A') ∧ A = ⋃ n, A' n := by
refine
⟨fun n => A ∩ disjointed s n, fun n => hA.inter (MeasurableSet.disjointed hm _), fun n =>
inter_subset_right.trans (disjointed_subset _ _),
(disjoint_disjointed s).mono fun k l hkl => hkl.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_disjointed, univ_subset_iff.mp h'', inter_univ]
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, hδε⟩
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, add_comm] at hδε
have : ∀ n, ∃ U ⊇ A n, IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ (A n) + δ n := by
intro n
have H₁ : ∀ t, μ.restrict (s n) t = μ (t ∩ s n) := fun t => restrict_apply' (hm n)
have Ht : μ.restrict (s n) (A n) ≠ ∞ := by
rw [H₁]
exact ((measure_mono (inter_subset_left.trans (subset_iUnion A n))).trans_lt HA).ne
rcases (A n).exists_isOpen_lt_add Ht (δ0 n).ne' with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
rw [H₁, H₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (hAs _)] at hU
exact ⟨U ∩ s n, subset_inter hAU (hAs _), hUo.inter (h' n), hU⟩
choose U hAU hUo hU using this
refine ⟨⋃ n, U n, iUnion_mono hAU, isOpen_iUnion hUo, ?_⟩
calc
μ (⋃ n, U n) ≤ ∑' n, μ (U n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (μ (A n) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => (hU n).le
_ = ∑' n, μ (A n) + ∑' n, δ n := ENNReal.tsum_add
_ = μ (⋃ n, A n) + ∑' n, δ n := (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (measure_iUnion hAd hAm).symm rfl)
_ < r := hδε
/-- See also `IsCompact.measure_closure` for a version
that assumes the `σ`-algebra to be the Borel `σ`-algebra but makes no assumptions on `μ`. -/
lemma measure_closure_eq_of_isCompact [R1Space α] [OuterRegular μ]
{k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k) : μ (closure k) = μ k := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (measure_mono subset_closure)
simp only [measure_eq_iInf_isOpen k, le_iInf_iff]
intro u ku u_open
exact measure_mono (hk.closure_subset_of_isOpen u_open ku)
end OuterRegular
| /-- If a measure `μ` admits finite spanning open sets such that the restriction of `μ` to each set
is outer regular, then the original measure is outer regular as well. -/
protected theorem FiniteSpanningSetsIn.outerRegular
[TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
(s : μ.FiniteSpanningSetsIn { U | IsOpen U ∧ OuterRegular (μ.restrict U) }) :
OuterRegular μ :=
OuterRegular.of_restrict (s := fun n ↦ s.set n) (fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).2)
(fun n ↦ (s.set_mem n).1) s.spanning.symm.subset
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Regular.lean | 440 | 447 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
/-!
# Short games
A combinatorial game is `Short` [Conway, ch.9][conway2001] if it has only finitely many positions.
In particular, this means there is a finite set of moves at every point.
We prove that the order relations `≤` and `<`, and the equivalence relation `≈`, are decidable on
short games, although unfortunately in practice `decide` doesn't seem to be able to
prove anything using these instances.
-/
-- Porting note: The local instances `moveLeftShort'` and `fintypeLeft` (and resp. `Right`)
-- trigger this error.
set_option synthInstance.checkSynthOrder false
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
/-- A short game is a game with a finite set of moves at every turn. -/
inductive Short : PGame.{u} → Type (u + 1)
| mk :
∀ {α β : Type u} {L : α → PGame.{u}} {R : β → PGame.{u}} (_ : ∀ i : α, Short (L i))
(_ : ∀ j : β, Short (R j)) [Fintype α] [Fintype β], Short ⟨α, β, L, R⟩
instance subsingleton_short (x : PGame) : Subsingleton (Short x) := by
induction x with
| mk xl xr xL xR =>
constructor
intro a b
cases a; cases b
congr!
-- Porting note: We use `induction` to prove `subsingleton_short` instead of recursion.
-- A proof using recursion generates a harder `decreasing_by` goal than in Lean 3 for some reason:
attribute [-instance] subsingleton_short in
theorem subsingleton_short_example : ∀ x : PGame, Subsingleton (Short x)
| mk xl xr xL xR =>
⟨fun a b => by
cases a; cases b
congr!
· funext x
apply @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_short_example (xL x))
-- Decreasing goal in Lean 4 is `Subsequent (xL x) (mk α β L R)`
-- where `α`, `β`, `L`, and `R` are fresh hypotheses only propositionally
-- equal to `xl`, `xr`, `xL`, and `xR`.
-- (In Lean 3 it was `(mk xl xr xL xR)` instead.)
| · funext x
apply @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_short_example (xR x))⟩
termination_by x => x
-- We need to unify a bunch of hypotheses before `pgame_wf_tac` can work.
decreasing_by all_goals {
subst_vars
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and] at *
casesm* _ ∧ _
subst_vars
pgame_wf_tac
}
/-- A synonym for `Short.mk` that specifies the pgame in an implicit argument. -/
def Short.mk' {x : PGame} [Fintype x.LeftMoves] [Fintype x.RightMoves]
(sL : ∀ i : x.LeftMoves, Short (x.moveLeft i))
(sR : ∀ j : x.RightMoves, Short (x.moveRight j)) : Short x := by
-- Porting note: Old proof relied on `unfreezingI`, which doesn't exist in Lean 4.
convert Short.mk sL sR
cases x
dsimp
attribute [class] Short
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Short.lean | 62 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
import Mathlib.Order.WellQuasiOrder
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Well-founded sets
This file introduces versions of `WellFounded` and `WellQuasiOrdered` for sets.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.WellFoundedOn s r` indicates that the relation `r` is
well-founded when restricted to the set `s`.
* `Set.IsWF s` indicates that `<` is well-founded when restricted to `s`.
* `Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn s r` indicates that the relation `r` is
partially well-ordered (also known as well quasi-ordered) when restricted to the set `s`.
* `Set.IsPWO s` indicates that any infinite sequence of elements in `s` contains an infinite
monotone subsequence. Note that this is equivalent to containing only two comparable elements.
## Main Results
* Higman's Lemma, `Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.partiallyWellOrderedOn_sublistForall₂`,
shows that if `r` is partially well-ordered on `s`, then `List.SublistForall₂` is partially
well-ordered on the set of lists of elements of `s`. The result was originally published by
Higman, but this proof more closely follows Nash-Williams.
* `Set.wellFoundedOn_iff` relates `well_founded_on` to the well-foundedness of a relation on the
original type, to avoid dealing with subtypes.
* `Set.IsWF.mono` shows that a subset of a well-founded subset is well-founded.
* `Set.IsWF.union` shows that the union of two well-founded subsets is well-founded.
* `Finset.isWF` shows that all `Finset`s are well-founded.
## TODO
* Prove that `s` is partial well ordered iff it has no infinite descending chain or antichain.
* Rename `Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn` to `Set.WellQuasiOrderedOn` and `Set.IsPWO` to `Set.IsWQO`.
## References
* [Higman, *Ordering by Divisibility in Abstract Algebras*][Higman52]
* [Nash-Williams, *On Well-Quasi-Ordering Finite Trees*][Nash-Williams63]
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Relations well-founded on sets -/
/-- `s.WellFoundedOn r` indicates that the relation `r` is `WellFounded` when restricted to `s`. -/
def WellFoundedOn (s : Set α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
WellFounded (Subrel r (· ∈ s))
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_empty (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFoundedOn ∅ r :=
wellFounded_of_isEmpty _
section WellFoundedOn
variable {r r' : α → α → Prop}
section AnyRel
variable {f : β → α} {s t : Set α} {x y : α}
theorem wellFoundedOn_iff :
s.WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded fun a b : α => r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
have f : RelEmbedding (Subrel r (· ∈ s)) fun a b : α => r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s :=
⟨⟨(↑), Subtype.coe_injective⟩, by simp⟩
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, f.wellFounded⟩
rw [WellFounded.wellFounded_iff_has_min]
intro t ht
by_cases hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty
· rw [← Subtype.preimage_coe_nonempty] at hst
rcases h.has_min (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) hst with ⟨⟨m, ms⟩, mt, hm⟩
exact ⟨m, mt, fun x xt ⟨xm, xs, _⟩ => hm ⟨x, xs⟩ xt xm⟩
· rcases ht with ⟨m, mt⟩
exact ⟨m, mt, fun x _ ⟨_, _, ms⟩ => hst ⟨m, ⟨ms, mt⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_univ : (univ : Set α).WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded r := by
simp [wellFoundedOn_iff]
theorem _root_.WellFounded.wellFoundedOn : WellFounded r → s.WellFoundedOn r :=
InvImage.wf _
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_range : (range f).WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded (r on f) := by
let f' : β → range f := fun c => ⟨f c, c, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun h => (InvImage.wf f' h).mono fun c c' => id, fun h => ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, c, rfl⟩
refine Acc.of_downward_closed f' ?_ _ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨_, c', rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨c', rfl⟩
· exact h.apply _
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_image {s : Set β} : (f '' s).WellFoundedOn r ↔ s.WellFoundedOn (r on f) := by
rw [image_eq_range]; exact wellFoundedOn_range
namespace WellFoundedOn
protected theorem induction (hs : s.WellFoundedOn r) (hx : x ∈ s) {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ y ∈ s, (∀ z ∈ s, r z y → P z) → P y) : P x := by
let Q : s → Prop := fun y => P y
change Q ⟨x, hx⟩
refine WellFounded.induction hs ⟨x, hx⟩ ?_
simpa only [Subtype.forall]
protected theorem mono (h : t.WellFoundedOn r') (hle : r ≤ r') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
s.WellFoundedOn r := by
rw [wellFoundedOn_iff] at *
exact Subrelation.wf (fun xy => ⟨hle _ _ xy.1, hst xy.2.1, hst xy.2.2⟩) h
theorem mono' (h : ∀ (a) (_ : a ∈ s) (b) (_ : b ∈ s), r' a b → r a b) :
s.WellFoundedOn r → s.WellFoundedOn r' :=
Subrelation.wf @fun a b => h _ a.2 _ b.2
theorem subset (h : t.WellFoundedOn r) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s.WellFoundedOn r :=
h.mono le_rfl hst
open Relation
open List in
/-- `a` is accessible under the relation `r` iff `r` is well-founded on the downward transitive
closure of `a` under `r` (including `a` or not). -/
theorem acc_iff_wellFoundedOn {α} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} :
TFAE [Acc r a,
WellFoundedOn { b | ReflTransGen r b a } r,
WellFoundedOn { b | TransGen r b a } r] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => ⟨fun b => InvImage.accessible Subtype.val ?_⟩
rw [← acc_transGen_iff] at h ⊢
obtain h' | h' := reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen.1 b.2
· rwa [h'] at h
· exact h.inv h'
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.subset fun _ => TransGen.to_reflTransGen
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
refine fun h => Acc.intro _ (fun b hb => (h.apply ⟨b, .single hb⟩).of_fibration Subtype.val ?_)
exact fun ⟨c, hc⟩ d h => ⟨⟨d, .head h hc⟩, h, rfl⟩
tfae_finish
end WellFoundedOn
end AnyRel
section IsStrictOrder
variable [IsStrictOrder α r] {s t : Set α}
instance IsStrictOrder.subset : IsStrictOrder α fun a b : α => r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s where
toIsIrrefl := ⟨fun a con => irrefl_of r a con.1⟩
toIsTrans := ⟨fun _ _ _ ab bc => ⟨trans_of r ab.1 bc.1, ab.2.1, bc.2.2⟩⟩
theorem wellFoundedOn_iff_no_descending_seq :
s.WellFoundedOn r ↔ ∀ f : ((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r, ¬∀ n, f n ∈ s := by
simp only [wellFoundedOn_iff, RelEmbedding.wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq, ← not_exists, ←
not_nonempty_iff, not_iff_not]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
have H : ∀ n, f n ∈ s := fun n => (hf.2 n.lt_succ_self).2.2
refine ⟨⟨f, ?_⟩, H⟩
simpa only [H, and_true] using @hf
· rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, hfs : ∀ n, f n ∈ s⟩
refine ⟨⟨f, ?_⟩⟩
simpa only [hfs, and_true] using @hf
theorem WellFoundedOn.union (hs : s.WellFoundedOn r) (ht : t.WellFoundedOn r) :
| (s ∪ t).WellFoundedOn r := by
rw [wellFoundedOn_iff_no_descending_seq] at *
rintro f hf
rcases Nat.exists_subseq_of_forall_mem_union f hf with ⟨g, hg | hg⟩
exacts [hs (g.dual.ltEmbedding.trans f) hg, ht (g.dual.ltEmbedding.trans f) hg]
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_union : (s ∪ t).WellFoundedOn r ↔ s.WellFoundedOn r ∧ t.WellFoundedOn r :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.subset subset_union_left, h.subset subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
end IsStrictOrder
| Mathlib/Order/WellFoundedSet.lean | 178 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linter.DeprecatedModule
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/GroupWithZero/Unbundled.lean | 508 | 514 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Exhaustion
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure with a given density with respect to another measure
For a measure `μ` on `α` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, we define a new measure `μ.withDensity f`.
On a measurable set `s`, that measure has value `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ`.
An important result about `withDensity` is the Radon-Nikodym theorem. It states that, given measures
`μ, ν`, if `HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν` then `μ` is absolutely continuous with respect to
`ν` if and only if there exists a measurable function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` such that
`μ = ν.withDensity f`.
See `MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_iff_withDensity_rnDeriv_eq`.
-/
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a measure `μ : Measure α` and a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, `μ.withDensity f` is the
measure such that for a measurable set `s` we have `μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable
def Measure.withDensity {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ) (by simp) fun _ hs hd =>
lintegral_iUnion hs hd _
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_apply (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
theorem withDensity_apply_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ μ.withDensity f s := by
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
calc
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_set (subset_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)
_ = μ.withDensity f t :=
(withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)).symm
_ = μ.withDensity f s := measure_toMeasurable s
/-! In the next theorem, the s-finiteness assumption is necessary. Here is a counterexample
without this assumption. Let `α` be an uncountable space, let `x₀` be some fixed point, and consider
the σ-algebra made of those sets which are countable and do not contain `x₀`, and of their
complements. This is the σ-algebra generated by the sets `{x}` for `x ≠ x₀`. Define a measure equal
to `+∞` on nonempty sets. Let `s = {x₀}` and `f` the indicator of `sᶜ`. Then
* `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ = 0`. Indeed, consider a simple function `g ≤ f`. It vanishes on `s`. Then
`∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ = 0`. Taking the supremum over `g` gives the claim.
* `μ.withDensity f s = +∞`. Indeed, this is the infimum of `μ.withDensity f t` over measurable sets
`t` containing `s`. As `s` is not measurable, such a set `t` contains a point `x ≠ x₀`. Then
`μ.withDensity f t ≥ μ.withDensity f {x} = ∫⁻ a in {x}, f a ∂μ = μ {x} = +∞`.
One checks that `μ.withDensity f = μ`, while `μ.restrict s` gives zero mass to sets not
containing `x₀`, and infinite mass to those that contain it. -/
theorem withDensity_apply' [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (withDensity_apply_le f s)
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
μ.withDensity f s ≤ μ.withDensity f t := measure_mono (subset_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by congr 1; exact restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite s
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero_left (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (0 : Measure α).withDensity f = 0 := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
simp
theorem withDensity_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h)
lemma withDensity_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f ≤ μ.withDensity g := by
refine le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
refine setLIntegral_mono_ae' hs ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x h_le using fun _ ↦ h_le
theorem withDensity_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.add_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs,
← lintegral_add_left hf]
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
theorem withDensity_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
simpa only [add_comm] using withDensity_add_left hg f
theorem withDensity_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ + ν).withDensity f = μ.withDensity f + ν.withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_add, lintegral_add_measure, Measure.add_apply]
theorem withDensity_sum {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : ι → Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(sum μ).withDensity f = sum fun n => (μ n).withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_sum μ hs, lintegral_sum_measure]
theorem withDensity_smul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul r hf]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem withDensity_smul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
theorem withDensity_smul_measure (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(r • μ).withDensity f = r • μ.withDensity f := by
ext s hs
simp [withDensity_apply, hs]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity f) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := by
rwa [withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_univ, lt_top_iff_ne_top] }
theorem withDensity_absolutelyContinuous {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity f ≪ μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs₁ hs₂ => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs₁]
exact setLIntegral_measure_zero _ _ hs₂
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_zero : μ.withDensity 0 = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_one : μ.withDensity 1 = μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : μ.withDensity (fun _ ↦ c) = c • μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
theorem withDensity_tsum {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, Measurable (f i)) :
μ.withDensity (∑' n, f n) = sum fun n => μ.withDensity (f n) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
change ∫⁻ x in s, (∑' n, f n) x ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ x, f i x ∂μ.restrict s
rw [← lintegral_tsum fun i => (h i).aemeasurable]
exact lintegral_congr fun x => tsum_apply (Pi.summable.2 fun _ => ENNReal.summable)
theorem withDensity_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator f) = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [withDensity_apply _ ht, lintegral_indicator hs, restrict_comm hs, ←
withDensity_apply _ ht]
theorem withDensity_indicator_one {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator 1) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [withDensity_indicator hs, withDensity_one]
theorem withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) ⟂ₘ
μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| -f x := by
set S : Set α := { x | f x < 0 }
have hS : MeasurableSet S := measurableSet_lt hf measurable_const
refine ⟨S, hS, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact (ae_restrict_mem hS).mono fun x hx => ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (le_of_lt hx)
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS.compl, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.neg.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact
(ae_restrict_mem hS.compl).mono fun x hx =>
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (not_lt.1 <| mt neg_pos.1 hx)
theorem restrict_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply _ (ht.inter hs),
restrict_restrict ht]
theorem restrict_withDensity' [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply' _ (t ∩ s),
restrict_restrict ht]
lemma trim_withDensity {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
(μ.withDensity f).trim hm = (μ.trim hm).withDensity f := by
refine @Measure.ext _ m _ _ (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_trim _ _ hs, lintegral_trim _ hf, trim_measurableSet_eq _ hs,
withDensity_apply _ (hm s hs)]
lemma Measure.MutuallySingular.withDensity {ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ ⟂ₘ ν) :
μ.withDensity f ⟂ₘ ν :=
MutuallySingular.mono_ac h (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _) AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, withDensity_apply _ .univ, restrict_univ, lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf]
alias ⟨withDensity_eq_zero, _⟩ := withDensity_eq_zero_iff
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 := by
constructor
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
apply measure_mono_null (inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s))
have A : μ.withDensity f t = 0 := by rw [measure_toMeasurable, hs]
rw [withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ s),
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (AEMeasurable.restrict hf),
EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff'₀, ae_iff] at A
swap
· simp only [measurableSet_toMeasurable, MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, mem_setOf_eq, Filter.mem_mk] at A
convert A using 2
ext x
simp only [and_comm, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq,
mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s)
have A : s ⊆ t ∪ { x | f x = 0 } := by
intro x hx
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (fx | fx)
· simp only [fx, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, or_true]
· left
apply subset_toMeasurable _ _
exact ⟨fx, hx⟩
apply measure_mono_null A (measure_union_null _ _)
· apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
rwa [measure_toMeasurable]
rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have t : {x | f x = 0} =ᵐ[μ.withDensity f] {x | g x = 0} := by
apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
rw [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha.symm,
fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha⟩
rw [measure_congr t, withDensity_congr_ae hfg]
have M : MeasurableSet { x : α | g x = 0 } := hg (measurableSet_singleton _)
rw [withDensity_apply _ M, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hg]
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem M]
simp only [imp_self, Pi.zero_apply, imp_true_iff]
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 :=
withDensity_apply_eq_zero' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem ae_withDensity_iff' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, ae_iff, withDensity_apply_eq_zero' hf, iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall]
theorem ae_withDensity_iff {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x :=
ae_withDensity_iff' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict { x | f x ≠ 0 }, p x := by
rw [ae_withDensity_iff' hf, ae_restrict_iff'₀]
· simp only [mem_setOf]
· rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have nonneg_eq_ae : {x | g x ≠ 0} =ᵐ[μ] {x | f x ≠ 0} := by
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
simp only [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun (h : g a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [← ha] at h,
fun (h : f a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [ha] at h⟩
exact NullMeasurableSet.congr
(MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet
<| hg (measurableSet_singleton _)).compl
nonneg_eq_ae
theorem ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict { x | f x ≠ 0 }, p x :=
ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict' <| hf.aemeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞) * g x) μ := by
have t : ∃ f', Measurable f' ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] f' := hf
rcases t with ⟨f', hf'_m, hf'_ae⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨g', g'meas, hg'⟩
have A : MeasurableSet {x | f' x ≠ 0} := hf'_m (measurableSet_singleton _).compl
refine ⟨fun x => f' x * g' x, hf'_m.coe_nnreal_ennreal.smul g'meas, ?_⟩
apply ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl { x | f' x ≠ 0 }
· rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal] at hg'
rw [ae_restrict_iff' A]
filter_upwards [hg', hf'_ae] with a ha h'a h_a_nonneg
have : (f' a : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero] using h_a_nonneg
rw [← h'a] at this ⊢
rw [ha this]
· rw [ae_restrict_iff' A.compl]
filter_upwards [hf'_ae] with a ha ha_null
have ha_null : f' a = 0 := Function.nmem_support.mp ha_null
rw [ha_null] at ha ⊢
rw [ha]
simp only [ENNReal.coe_zero, zero_mul]
· rintro ⟨g', g'meas, hg'⟩
refine ⟨fun x => ((f' x)⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * g' x, hf'_m.coe_nnreal_ennreal.inv.smul g'meas, ?_⟩
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal]
filter_upwards [hg', hf'_ae] with a hfga hff'a h'a
rw [hff'a] at hfga h'a
rw [← hfga, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h'a ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
theorem aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Measurable f) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞) * g x) μ :=
aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff' <| hf.aemeasurable
open MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
/-- This is Exercise 1.2.1 from [tao2010]. It allows you to express integration of a measurable
function with respect to `(μ.withDensity f)` as an integral with respect to `μ`, called the base
measure. `μ` is often the Lebesgue measure, and in this circumstance `f` is the probability density
function, and `(μ.withDensity f)` represents any continuous random variable as a
probability measure, such as the uniform distribution between 0 and 1, the Gaussian distribution,
the exponential distribution, the Beta distribution, or the Cauchy distribution (see Section 2.4
of [wasserman2004]). Thus, this method shows how to one can calculate expectations, variances,
and other moments as a function of the probability density function.
-/
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h_mf : Measurable f) :
∀ {g : α → ℝ≥0∞}, Measurable g → ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply Measurable.ennreal_induction
· intro c s h_ms
simp [*, mul_comm _ c, ← indicator_mul_right]
· intro g h _ h_mea_g _ h_ind_g h_ind_h
simp [mul_add, *, Measurable.mul]
· intro g h_mea_g h_mono_g h_ind
have : Monotone fun n a => f a * g n a := fun m n hmn x => mul_le_mul_left' (h_mono_g hmn x) _
simp [lintegral_iSup, ENNReal.mul_iSup, h_mf.mul (h_mea_g _), *]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ x in s, (f * g) x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ hf hg]
/-- The Lebesgue integral of `g` with respect to the measure `μ.withDensity f` coincides with
the integral of `f * g`. This version assumes that `g` is almost everywhere measurable. For a
version without conditions on `g` but requiring that `f` is almost everywhere finite, see
`lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable` -/
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity f)) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
let f' := hf.mk f
have : μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity f' := withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
rw [this] at hg ⊢
let g' := hg.mk g
calc
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f' = ∫⁻ a, g' a ∂μ.withDensity f' := lintegral_congr_ae hg.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g') a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk)
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
apply ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl { x | f' x ≠ 0 }
· have Z := hg.ae_eq_mk
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict hf.measurable_mk] at Z
filter_upwards [Z]
intro x hx
simp only [g', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
· have M : MeasurableSet { x : α | f' x ≠ 0 }ᶜ :=
(hf.measurable_mk (measurableSet_singleton 0).compl).compl
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem M]
intro x hx
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, zero_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
_ = ∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx
simp only [f', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
lemma setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.withDensity f))
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf.restrict]
rw [← restrict_withDensity hs]
exact hg.restrict
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ :=
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf (hg.mono' (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f))
lemma setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ :=
setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf
(hg.mono' (MeasureTheory.withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ f)) hs
theorem lintegral_withDensity_le_lintegral_mul (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f) ≤ ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i i_meas => iSup_le fun hi => ?_
have A : f * i ≤ f * g := fun x => mul_le_mul_left' (hi x) _
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (f * i) (f_meas.mul i_meas) ?_
exact le_iSup_of_le A (le_of_eq (lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ f_meas i_meas))
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (lintegral_withDensity_le_lintegral_mul μ f_meas g) ?_
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i i_meas => iSup_le fun hi => ?_
have A : (fun x => (f x)⁻¹ * i x) ≤ g := by
intro x
dsimp
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact div_le_of_le_mul' (hi x)
refine le_iSup_of_le (fun x => (f x)⁻¹ * i x) (le_iSup_of_le (f_meas.inv.mul i_meas) ?_)
refine le_iSup_of_le A ?_
rw [lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ f_meas (f_meas.inv.mul i_meas)]
apply lintegral_mono_ae
filter_upwards [hf]
intro x h'x
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (hx | hx)
· have := hi x
simp only [hx, zero_mul, Pi.mul_apply, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
simp [this]
· apply le_of_eq _
dsimp
rw [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hx h'x.ne, one_mul]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(f_meas : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ f_meas hf]
theorem lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ (μ : Measure α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
let f' := hf.mk f
calc
∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ.withDensity f' := by
rw [withDensity_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk]
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f' * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ hf.measurable_mk
filter_upwards [h'f, hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx h'x
rwa [← h'x]
_ = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk]
intro x hx
simp only [f', hx, Pi.mul_apply]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀ (μ : Measure α)
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity hs, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ _ hf h'f]
theorem setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀' (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ]
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Set α) (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(h'f : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x < ∞) :
∫⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ.withDensity f = ∫⁻ a in s, (f * g) a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_withDensity' s, lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable₀ _ hf h'f]
theorem withDensity_mul₀ {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
μ.withDensity (f * g) = (μ.withDensity f).withDensity g := by
ext1 s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_withDensity hs,
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀ hf.restrict hg.restrict]
theorem withDensity_mul (μ : Measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f * g) = (μ.withDensity f).withDensity g :=
withDensity_mul₀ hf.aemeasurable hg.aemeasurable
lemma withDensity_inv_same_le {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity f⁻¹ ≤ μ := by
change (μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) ≤ μ
rw [← withDensity_mul₀ hf hf.inv]
suffices (f * fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) ≤ᵐ[μ] 1 by
refine (withDensity_mono this).trans ?_
rw [withDensity_one]
filter_upwards with x
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.one_apply]
by_cases hx_top : f x = ∞
· simp only [hx_top, ENNReal.inv_top, mul_zero, zero_le]
by_cases hx_zero : f x = 0
· simp only [hx_zero, ENNReal.inv_zero, zero_mul, zero_le]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hx_zero hx_top]
lemma withDensity_inv_same₀ {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_ne_zero : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0) (hf_ne_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) = μ := by
rw [← withDensity_mul₀ hf hf.inv]
suffices (f * fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) =ᵐ[μ] 1 by
rw [withDensity_congr_ae this, withDensity_one]
filter_upwards [hf_ne_zero, hf_ne_top] with x hf_ne_zero hf_ne_top
simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
| rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hf_ne_zero hf_ne_top, Pi.one_apply]
lemma withDensity_inv_same {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable f) (hf_ne_zero : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0) (hf_ne_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).withDensity (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) = μ :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensity.lean | 521 | 525 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
| _ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 417 | 418 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
· exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
· simp only [← ih]
exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
theorem lcs_le_self : N.lcs k ≤ N := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih).trans (N.lie_le_right ⊤)
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap : lowerCentralSeries R L N k = (N.lcs k).comap N.incl := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at ih ⊢
have : N.lcs k ≤ N.incl.range := by
rw [N.range_incl]
apply lcs_le_self
rw [ih, LieSubmodule.comap_bracket_eq _ N.incl _ N.ker_incl this]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs : (lowerCentralSeries R L N k).map N.incl = N.lcs k := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.map_comap_incl, inf_eq_right]
apply lcs_le_self
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot:
lowerCentralSeries R L N k = ⊥ ↔ lcs k N = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← N.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs, ← LieModuleHom.le_ker_iff_map]
simpa
· rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, comap_incl_eq_bot]
simp [h]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable {M₂ : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (R L M)
theorem antitone_lowerCentralSeries : Antitone <| lowerCentralSeries R L M := by
intro l k
induction k generalizing l with
| zero => exact fun h ↦ (Nat.le_zero.mp h).symm ▸ le_rfl
| succ k ih =>
intro h
rcases Nat.of_le_succ h with (hk | hk)
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (ih hk)).trans (LieSubmodule.lie_le_right _ _)
· exact hk.symm ▸ le_rfl
theorem eventually_iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq [IsArtinian R M] :
∀ᶠ l in Filter.atTop, ⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = lowerCentralSeries R L M l := by
have h_wf : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ :=
LieSubmodule.wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → lowerCentralSeries R L M n = lowerCentralSeries R L M m⟩ :=
h_wf.monotone_chain_condition ⟨_, antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M⟩
refine Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun l hl ↦ le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun m ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases le_or_lt l m with h | h
· rw [← hn _ hl, ← hn _ (hl.trans h)]
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (le_of_lt h)
theorem trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot : IsTrivial L M ↔ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp
· rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] at h; apply IsTrivial.mk; intro x m; apply h
apply LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
simp only [LieSubmodule.top_coe, Subtype.exists, LieSubmodule.mem_top, exists_prop, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf]
exact ⟨x, m, rfl⟩
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries (x : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x)^[k] m ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Function.iterate_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ',
toEnd_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ih
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ (x y : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y)^[k] m ∈
lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hk : 2 * k.succ = (2 * k + 1) + 1 := rfl
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ', hk,
toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ?_
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top y) ih
variable {R L M}
theorem map_lowerCentralSeries_le (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [lowerCentralSeries_zero, le_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih
lemma map_lowerCentralSeries_eq {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f = lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
apply le_antisymm (map_lowerCentralSeries_le k f)
induction k with
| zero =>
rwa [lowerCentralSeries_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, top_le_iff, f.map_top,
f.range_eq_top]
| succ =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
apply LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
assumption
end
open LieAlgebra
theorem derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries (k : ℕ) :
derivedSeries R L k ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L L k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero]
| succ k h =>
have h' : derivedSeries R L k ≤ ⊤ := by simp only [le_top]
rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie h' h
/-- A Lie module is nilpotent if its lower central series reaches 0 (in a finite number of
steps). -/
@[mk_iff isNilpotent_iff_int]
class IsNilpotent : Prop where
mk_int ::
nilpotent_int : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- See also `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top`. -/
lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent L M ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [isNilpotent_iff_int, SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
lemma IsNilpotent.nilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mp ‹_›
variable {R L} in
lemma IsNilpotent.mk {k : ℕ} (h : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥) : IsNilpotent L M :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mpr ⟨k, h⟩
@[deprecated IsNilpotent.nilpotent (since := "2025-01-07")]
theorem exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
@[simp] lemma iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact iInf_le _ _
end
section
variable {R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem _root_.LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L N ↔ ∃ k, N.lcs k = ⊥ := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L N]
refine exists_congr fun k => ?_
rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap k, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot,
inf_eq_right.mpr (N.lcs_le_self k)]
variable (R L M)
instance (priority := 100) trivialIsNilpotent [IsTrivial L M] : IsNilpotent L M :=
⟨by use 1; simp⟩
instance instIsNilpotentSup (M₁ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) [IsNilpotent L M₁] [IsNilpotent L M₂] :
IsNilpotent L (M₁ ⊔ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₁
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₂
let lcs_eq_bot {m n} (N : LieSubmodule R L M) (le : m ≤ n) (hn : lowerCentralSeries R L N m = ⊥) :
lowerCentralSeries R L N n = ⊥ := by
simpa [hn] using antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L N le
have h₁ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₁ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₁ (Nat.le_max_left k l) hk
have h₂ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₂ (Nat.le_max_right k l) hl
refine (isNilpotent_iff R L (M₁ + M₂)).mpr ⟨k ⊔ l, ?_⟩
simp [LieSubmodule.add_eq_sup, (M₁ ⊔ M₂).lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.lcs_sup,
(M₁.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₁,
(M₂.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₂, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot]
theorem exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k : ℕ, ∀ x : L, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
use k
intro x; ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @LieSubmodule.mem_bot R L M, ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R L M x m k
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x) := by
change ∃ k, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0
have := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
tauto
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ [IsNilpotent L M] (x y : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y) := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
replace hM : lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hM]; exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (by omega)
use k
ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← LieSubmodule.mem_bot (R := R) (L := L), ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ R L M x y m k
@[simp] lemma maxGenEigenSpace_toEnd_eq_top [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
((toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace 0) = ⊤ := by
ext m
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul, sub_zero, Submodule.mem_top,
iff_true]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
exact ⟨k, by simp [hk x]⟩
/-- If the quotient of a Lie module `M` by a Lie submodule on which the Lie algebra acts trivially
is nilpotent then `M` is nilpotent.
This is essentially the Lie module equivalent of the fact that a central
extension of nilpotent Lie algebras is nilpotent. See `LieAlgebra.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient`
below for the corresponding result for Lie algebras. -/
theorem nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient {N : LieSubmodule R L M} (h₁ : N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M)
(h₂ : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) : IsNilpotent L M := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L] at h₂ ⊢
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
use k + 1
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
suffices lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N by
replace this := LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (le_trans this h₁)
rwa [ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, ← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact map_lowerCentralSeries_le k (LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' N)
theorem isNilpotent_quotient_iff :
IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N) ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
| rw [isNilpotent_iff R L]
refine exists_congr fun k ↦ ?_
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, map_lowerCentralSeries_eq k
(LieSubmodule.Quotient.surjective_mk' N)]
theorem iInf_lcs_le_of_isNilpotent_quot (h : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (isNilpotent_quotient_iff R L M N).mp h
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 375 | 382 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.Approximations
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Computation.CorrectnessTerminating
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
/-!
# Termination of Continued Fraction Computations (`GenContFract.of`)
## Summary
We show that the continued fraction for a value `v`, as defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic`, terminates if and only if `v` corresponds to a
rational number, that is `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Main Theorems
- `GenContFract.coe_of_rat_eq` shows that
`GenContFract.of v = GenContFract.of q` for `v : α` given that `↑v = q` and `q : ℚ`.
- `GenContFract.terminates_iff_rat` shows that
`GenContFract.of v` terminates if and only if `↑v = q` for some `q : ℚ`.
## Tags
rational, continued fraction, termination
-/
namespace GenContFract
open GenContFract (of)
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [FloorRing K]
/-
We will have to constantly coerce along our structures in the following proofs using their provided
map functions.
-/
attribute [local simp] Pair.map IntFractPair.mapFr
section RatOfTerminates
/-!
### Terminating Continued Fractions Are Rational
We want to show that the computation of a continued fraction `GenContFract.of v`
terminates if and only if `v ∈ ℚ`. In this section, we show the implication from left to right.
We first show that every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number `q` and then use the
finite correctness proof (`of_correctness_of_terminates`) of `GenContFract.of` to show that
`v = ↑q`.
-/
variable (v : K) (n : ℕ)
nonrec theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).contsAux n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) :=
Nat.strong_induction_on n
(by
clear n
let g := of v
intro n IH
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
-- n = 0
· suffices ∃ gp : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk (1 : K) 0 = gp.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk 1 0
simp
-- n = 1
· suffices ∃ conts : Pair ℚ, Pair.mk g.h 1 = conts.map (↑) by simpa [contsAux]
use Pair.mk ⌊v⌋ 1
simp [g]
-- 2 ≤ n
· obtain ⟨pred_conts, pred_conts_eq⟩ := IH (n + 1) <| lt_add_one (n + 1)
-- invoke the IH
rcases s_ppred_nth_eq : g.s.get? n with gp_n | gp_n
-- option.none
· use pred_conts
have : g.contsAux (n + 2) = g.contsAux (n + 1) :=
contsAux_stable_of_terminated (n + 1).le_succ s_ppred_nth_eq
simp only [g, this, pred_conts_eq]
-- option.some
· -- invoke the IH a second time
obtain ⟨ppred_conts, ppred_conts_eq⟩ :=
IH n <| lt_of_le_of_lt n.le_succ <| lt_add_one <| n + 1
obtain ⟨a_eq_one, z, b_eq_z⟩ : gp_n.a = 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, gp_n.b = (z : K) :=
of_partNum_eq_one_and_exists_int_partDen_eq s_ppred_nth_eq
-- finally, unfold the recurrence to obtain the required rational value.
simp only [g, a_eq_one, b_eq_z,
contsAux_recurrence s_ppred_nth_eq ppred_conts_eq pred_conts_eq]
use nextConts 1 (z : ℚ) ppred_conts pred_conts
cases ppred_conts; cases pred_conts
simp [nextConts, nextNum, nextDen])
theorem exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts :
∃ conts : Pair ℚ, (of v).conts n = (conts.map (↑) : Pair K) := by
rw [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_contAux]; exact exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_of_nth_contsAux v <| n + 1
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_num : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).nums n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨a, _⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use a
simp [num_eq_conts_a, nth_cont_eq]
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_den : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).dens n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_gcf_pair_rat_eq_nth_conts v n with ⟨⟨_, b⟩, nth_cont_eq⟩
use b
simp [den_eq_conts_b, nth_cont_eq]
/-- Every finite convergent corresponds to a rational number. -/
theorem exists_rat_eq_nth_conv : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).convs n = (q : K) := by
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_num v n with ⟨Aₙ, nth_num_eq⟩
rcases exists_rat_eq_nth_den v n with ⟨Bₙ, nth_den_eq⟩
use Aₙ / Bₙ
simp [nth_num_eq, nth_den_eq, conv_eq_num_div_den]
variable {v}
/-- Every terminating continued fraction corresponds to a rational number. -/
theorem exists_rat_eq_of_terminates (terminates : (of v).Terminates) : ∃ q : ℚ, v = ↑q := by
obtain ⟨n, v_eq_conv⟩ : ∃ n, v = (of v).convs n := of_correctness_of_terminates terminates
obtain ⟨q, conv_eq_q⟩ : ∃ q : ℚ, (of v).convs n = (↑q : K) := exists_rat_eq_nth_conv v n
have : v = (↑q : K) := Eq.trans v_eq_conv conv_eq_q
use q, this
end RatOfTerminates
section RatTranslation
/-!
### Technical Translation Lemmas
Before we can show that the continued fraction of a rational number terminates, we have to prove
some technical translation lemmas. More precisely, in this section, we show that, given a rational
number `q : ℚ` and value `v : K` with `v = ↑q`, the continued fraction of `q` and `v` coincide.
In particular, we show that
```lean
(↑(GenContFract.of q : GenContFract ℚ) : GenContFract K) = GenContFract.of v`
```
in `GenContFract.coe_of_rat_eq`.
To do this, we proceed bottom-up, showing the correspondence between the basic functions involved in
the Computation first and then lift the results step-by-step.
-/
-- The lifting works for arbitrary linear ordered fields with a floor function.
variable {v : K} {q : ℚ}
/-! First, we show the correspondence for the very basic functions in
`GenContFract.IntFractPair`. -/
namespace IntFractPair
theorem coe_of_rat_eq (v_eq_q : v = (↑q : K)) :
((IntFractPair.of q).mapFr (↑) : IntFractPair K) = IntFractPair.of v := by
simp [IntFractPair.of, v_eq_q]
theorem coe_stream_nth_rat_eq (v_eq_q : v = (↑q : K)) (n : ℕ) :
((IntFractPair.stream q n).map (mapFr (↑)) : Option <| IntFractPair K) =
IntFractPair.stream v n := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [IntFractPair.stream, Option.map_some', coe_of_rat_eq v_eq_q]
| succ n IH =>
rw [v_eq_q] at IH
cases stream_q_nth_eq : IntFractPair.stream q n with
| | none => simp [IntFractPair.stream, IH.symm, v_eq_q, stream_q_nth_eq]
| some ifp_n =>
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Computation/TerminatesIffRat.lean | 170 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma pow_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, a ^ n = 0 → a = 0
| 0, ha => by simpa using congr_arg (a * ·) ha
| n + 1, ha => by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_zero] at ha; exact ha.elim pow_eq_zero id
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨pow_eq_zero, by rintro rfl; exact zero_pow hn⟩
lemma pow_ne_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (pow_eq_zero_iff hn).not
@[field_simps]
lemma pow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h
instance NeZero.pow [NeZero a] : NeZero (a ^ n) := ⟨pow_ne_zero n NeZero.out⟩
lemma sq_eq_zero_iff : a ^ 2 = 0 ↔ a = 0 := pow_eq_zero_iff two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff' [Nontrivial M₀] : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_right_inv_of_exists_left_inv {α} [MonoidWithZero α]
(h : ∀ a : α, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : α, b * a = 1) {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ b : α, a * b = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ := subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· exact ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h b (left_ne_zero_of_mul <| hb.trans_ne one_ne_zero)
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← one_mul (a * b), ← hc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc b, hb, one_mul, hc]
end MonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) CancelMonoidWithZero.to_noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors M₀ :=
⟨fun ab0 => or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ha => mul_left_cancel₀ ha <|
ab0.trans (mul_zero _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_right_iff : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b ∨ c = 0 := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> [simp only [hc, mul_zero, or_true]; simp [mul_left_inj', hc]]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_left_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c ∨ a = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> [simp only [ha, zero_mul, or_true]; simp [mul_right_inj', ha]]
theorem mul_right_eq_self₀ : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 :=
calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 := mul_eq_mul_left_iff
theorem mul_left_eq_self₀ : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 :=
calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 := mul_eq_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_right_inj' ha, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_left_inj' hb, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_left₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_right₀ hb]
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by right multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : a * b = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_left_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (mul_one a).symm
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by left multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : b * a = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_right_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (one_mul a).symm
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b x : G₀}
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_right_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => x * y := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul] using congr_arg (fun y => x⁻¹ * y) w
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_left_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => y * x := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one] using congr_arg (fun y => y * x⁻¹) w
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
calc
a * b⁻¹ * b = a * (b⁻¹ * b) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
calc
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = a⁻¹ * a * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
_ = b := by simp [h]
private theorem inv_eq_of_mul (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h) b, h, mul_one]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toDivisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid G₀ :=
{ ‹GroupWithZero G₀› with
inv := Inv.inv,
inv_inv := fun a => by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp [h]
· exact left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_cancel₀ <| inv_ne_zero h) (inv_mul_cancel₀ h)
,
mul_inv_rev := fun a b => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· simp [hb]
apply inv_eq_of_mul
simp [mul_assoc, ha, hb],
inv_eq_of_mul := fun _ _ => inv_eq_of_mul }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero : CancelMonoidWithZero G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hx h => by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx y, h, inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx z],
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hy h => by
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy x, h, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy z] }
end GroupWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : G₀) : 0 / a = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : G₀) : a / 0 = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_zero, mul_zero]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then by its inverse results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_mul_inv (a : G₀) : a * a * a⁻¹ = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one]
/-- Multiplying `a` by its inverse and then by itself results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_mul_cancel (a : G₀) : a * a⁻¹ * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a⁻¹` by `a` twice results in `a` (whether or not `a`
is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_mul_self (a : G₀) : a⁻¹ * a * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
| /-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then dividing by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 347 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
| @[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 333 | 336 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.