Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 380 | 393 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
/-!
# Diagonal matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about diagonal matrices.
## Main results
- `Matrix.IsDiag`: a proposition that states a given square matrix `A` is diagonal.
## Tags
diag, diagonal, matrix
-/
namespace Matrix
variable {α β R n m : Type*}
open Function
open Matrix Kronecker
/-- `A.IsDiag` means square matrix `A` is a diagonal matrix. -/
def IsDiag [Zero α] (A : Matrix n n α) : Prop :=
Pairwise fun i j => A i j = 0
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_diagonal [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (d : n → α) : (diagonal d).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
Matrix.diagonal_apply_ne _
/-- Diagonal matrices are generated by the `Matrix.diagonal` of their `Matrix.diag`. -/
theorem IsDiag.diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsDiag) :
diagonal (diag A) = A :=
ext fun i j => by
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq, diag]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij, h hij]
/-- `Matrix.IsDiag.diagonal_diag` as an iff. -/
theorem isDiag_iff_diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n α) :
A.IsDiag ↔ diagonal (diag A) = A :=
⟨IsDiag.diagonal_diag, fun hd => hd ▸ isDiag_diagonal (diag A)⟩
/-- Every matrix indexed by a subsingleton is diagonal. -/
theorem isDiag_of_subsingleton [Zero α] [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) : A.IsDiag :=
fun i j h => (h <| Subsingleton.elim i j).elim
/-- Every zero matrix is diagonal. -/
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_zero [Zero α] : (0 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ _ => rfl
/-- Every identity matrix is diagonal. -/
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_one [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] : (1 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
one_apply_ne
theorem IsDiag.map [Zero α] [Zero β] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : α → β} (hf : f 0 = 0) :
(A.map f).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hf]
theorem IsDiag.neg [SubtractionMonoid α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : (-A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_neg_iff [SubtractionMonoid α] {A : Matrix n n α} : (-A).IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha _ _ h => neg_eq_zero.1 (ha h), IsDiag.neg⟩
theorem IsDiag.add [AddZeroClass α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A + B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
theorem IsDiag.sub [SubtractionMonoid α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A - B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
theorem IsDiag.smul [Zero α] [SMulZeroClass R α] (k : R) {A : Matrix n n α}
(ha : A.IsDiag) : (k • A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_smul_one (n) [MulZeroOneClass α] [DecidableEq n] (k : α) :
(k • (1 : Matrix n n α)).IsDiag :=
isDiag_one.smul k
theorem IsDiag.transpose [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : Aᵀ.IsDiag := fun _ _ h =>
ha h.symm
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_transpose_iff [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} : Aᵀ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨IsDiag.transpose, IsDiag.transpose⟩
theorem IsDiag.conjTranspose [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α}
(ha : A.IsDiag) : Aᴴ.IsDiag :=
ha.transpose.map (star_zero _)
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_conjTranspose_iff [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α} :
Aᴴ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha => by
convert ha.conjTranspose
simp, IsDiag.conjTranspose⟩
theorem IsDiag.submatrix [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : m → n}
(hf : Injective f) : (A.submatrix f f).IsDiag := fun _ _ h => ha (hf.ne h)
/-- `(A ⊗ B).IsDiag` if both `A` and `B` are diagonal. -/
theorem IsDiag.kronecker [MulZeroClass α] {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsDiag)
(hB : B.IsDiag) : (A ⊗ₖ B).IsDiag := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ h
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, Ne, not_and_or] at h
rcases h with hac | hbd
· simp [hA hac]
· simp [hB hbd]
theorem IsDiag.isSymm [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsDiag) : A.IsSymm := by
ext i j
by_cases g : i = j; · rw [g, transpose_apply]
simp [h g, h (Ne.symm g)]
/-- The block matrix `A.fromBlocks 0 0 D` is diagonal if `A` and `D` are diagonal. -/
theorem IsDiag.fromBlocks [Zero α] {A : Matrix m m α} {D : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag)
(hd : D.IsDiag) : (A.fromBlocks 0 0 D).IsDiag := by
rintro (i | i) (j | j) hij
· exact ha (ne_of_apply_ne _ hij)
· rfl
· rfl
· exact hd (ne_of_apply_ne _ hij)
|
/-- This is the `iff` version of `Matrix.IsDiag.fromBlocks`. -/
theorem isDiag_fromBlocks_iff [Zero α] {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {C : Matrix n m α}
{D : Matrix n n α} : (A.fromBlocks B C D).IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag ∧ B = 0 ∧ C = 0 ∧ D.IsDiag := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i j hij => ?_, ext fun i j => ?_, ext fun i j => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/IsDiag.lean | 143 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ClassNumber.AdmissibleAbsoluteValue
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
/-!
# Admissible absolute value on the integers
This file defines an admissible absolute value `AbsoluteValue.absIsAdmissible`
which we use to show the class number of the ring of integers of a number field
is finite.
## Main results
* `AbsoluteValue.absIsAdmissible` shows the "standard" absolute value on `ℤ`,
mapping negative `x` to `-x`, is admissible.
-/
namespace AbsoluteValue
open Int
/-- We can partition a finite family into `partition_card ε` sets, such that the remainders
in each set are close together. -/
theorem exists_partition_int (n : ℕ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {b : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (A : Fin n → ℤ) :
∃ t : Fin n → Fin ⌈1 / ε⌉₊,
| ∀ i₀ i₁, t i₀ = t i₁ → ↑(abs (A i₁ % b - A i₀ % b)) < abs b • ε := by
have hb' : (0 : ℝ) < ↑(abs b) := Int.cast_pos.mpr (abs_pos.mpr hb)
have hbε : 0 < abs b • ε := by
rw [Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_pos hb' hε
have hfloor : ∀ i, 0 ≤ floor ((A i % b : ℤ) / abs b • ε : ℝ) :=
fun _ ↦ floor_nonneg.mpr (div_nonneg (cast_nonneg.mpr (emod_nonneg _ hb)) hbε.le)
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ⟨natAbs (floor ((A i % b : ℤ) / abs b • ε : ℝ)), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← ofNat_lt, natAbs_of_nonneg (hfloor i), floor_lt, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, ← div_div]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (Nat.le_ceil _)
gcongr
rw [div_lt_one hb', cast_lt]
exact Int.emod_lt_abs _ hb
intro i₀ i₁ hi
have hi : (⌊↑(A i₀ % b) / abs b • ε⌋.natAbs : ℤ) = ⌊↑(A i₁ % b) / abs b • ε⌋.natAbs :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) (Fin.mk_eq_mk.mp hi)
rw [natAbs_of_nonneg (hfloor i₀), natAbs_of_nonneg (hfloor i₁)] at hi
have hi := abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor hi
rw [abs_sub_comm, ← sub_div, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg hbε.le, div_lt_iff₀ hbε, one_mul] at hi
rwa [Int.cast_abs, Int.cast_sub]
/-- `abs : ℤ → ℤ` is an admissible absolute value. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ClassNumber/AdmissibleAbs.lean | 31 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Lexicographic order on Pi types
This file defines the lexicographic order for Pi types. `a` is less than `b` if `a i = b i` for all
`i` up to some point `k`, and `a k < b k`.
## Notation
* `Πₗ i, α i`: Pi type equipped with the lexicographic order. Type synonym of `Π i, α i`.
## See also
Related files are:
* `Data.Finset.Colex`: Colexicographic order on finite sets.
* `Data.List.Lex`: Lexicographic order on lists.
* `Data.Sigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σₗ i, α i`.
* `Data.PSigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σₗ' i, α i`.
* `Data.Prod.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `α × β`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {ι : Type*} {β : ι → Type*} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ {i}, β i → β i → Prop)
namespace Pi
/-- The lexicographic relation on `Π i : ι, β i`, where `ι` is ordered by `r`,
and each `β i` is ordered by `s`. -/
protected def Lex (x y : ∀ i, β i) : Prop :=
∃ i, (∀ j, r j i → x j = y j) ∧ s (x i) (y i)
/- This unfortunately results in a type that isn't delta-reduced, so we keep the notation out of the
basic API, just in case -/
/-- The notation `Πₗ i, α i` refers to a pi type equipped with the lexicographic order. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false) "Πₗ "(...)", "r:(scoped p => Lex (∀ i, p i)) => r
@[simp]
theorem toLex_apply (x : ∀ i, β i) (i : ι) : toLex x i = x i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLex_apply (x : Lex (∀ i, β i)) (i : ι) : ofLex x i = x i :=
rfl
theorem lex_lt_of_lt_of_preorder [∀ i, Preorder (β i)] {r} (hwf : WellFounded r) {x y : ∀ i, β i}
(hlt : x < y) : ∃ i, (∀ j, r j i → x j ≤ y j ∧ y j ≤ x j) ∧ x i < y i :=
let h' := Pi.lt_def.1 hlt
let ⟨i, hi, hl⟩ := hwf.has_min _ h'.2
⟨i, fun j hj => ⟨h'.1 j, not_not.1 fun h => hl j (lt_of_le_not_le (h'.1 j) h) hj⟩, hi⟩
theorem lex_lt_of_lt [∀ i, PartialOrder (β i)] {r} (hwf : WellFounded r) {x y : ∀ i, β i}
(hlt : x < y) : Pi.Lex r (@fun _ => (· < ·)) x y := by
simp_rw [Pi.Lex, le_antisymm_iff]
exact lex_lt_of_lt_of_preorder hwf hlt
theorem isTrichotomous_lex [∀ i, IsTrichotomous (β i) s] (wf : WellFounded r) :
IsTrichotomous (∀ i, β i) (Pi.Lex r @s) :=
{ trichotomous := fun a b => by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with hab | hab
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hab)
· rw [Function.ne_iff] at hab
let i := wf.min _ hab
| have hri : ∀ j, r j i → a j = b j := by
intro j
rw [← not_imp_not]
exact fun h' => wf.not_lt_min _ _ h'
have hne : a i ≠ b i := wf.min_mem _ hab
rcases trichotomous_of s (a i) (b i) with hi | hi
exacts [Or.inl ⟨i, hri, hi⟩,
Or.inr <| Or.inr <| ⟨i, fun j hj => (hri j hj).symm, hi.resolve_left hne⟩] }
instance [LT ι] [∀ a, LT (β a)] : LT (Lex (∀ i, β i)) :=
⟨Pi.Lex (· < ·) @fun _ => (· < ·)⟩
instance Lex.isStrictOrder [LinearOrder ι] [∀ a, PartialOrder (β a)] :
IsStrictOrder (Lex (∀ i, β i)) (· < ·) where
irrefl := fun a ⟨k, _, hk₂⟩ => lt_irrefl (a k) hk₂
| Mathlib/Order/PiLex.lean | 71 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
/-!
# Minimality and Maximality
This file proves basic facts about minimality and maximality
of an element with respect to a predicate `P` on an ordered type `α`.
## Implementation Details
This file underwent a refactor from a version where minimality and maximality were defined using
sets rather than predicates, and with an unbundled order relation rather than a `LE` instance.
A side effect is that it has become less straightforward to state that something is minimal
with respect to a relation that is *not* defeq to the default `LE`.
One possible way would be with a type synonym,
and another would be with an ad hoc `LE` instance and `@` notation.
This was not an issue in practice anywhere in mathlib at the time of the refactor,
but it may be worth re-examining this to make it easier in the future; see the TODO below.
## TODO
* In the linearly ordered case, versions of lemmas like `minimal_mem_image` will hold with
`MonotoneOn`/`AntitoneOn` assumptions rather than the stronger `x ≤ y ↔ f x ≤ f y` assumptions.
* `Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert` and `Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton` will generalize to
lemmas about covering in the case of an `IsStronglyAtomic`/`IsStronglyCoatomic` order.
* `Finset` versions of the lemmas about sets.
* API to allow for easily expressing min/maximality with respect to an arbitrary non-`LE` relation.
* API for `MinimalFor`/`MaximalFor`
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Set OrderDual
variable {α : Type*} {P Q : α → Prop} {a x y : α}
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[simp] theorem minimal_toDual : Minimal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Maximal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Minimal.of_dual, Minimal.dual⟩ := minimal_toDual
@[simp] theorem maximal_toDual : Maximal (fun x ↦ P (ofDual x)) (toDual x) ↔ Minimal P x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Maximal.of_dual, Maximal.dual⟩ := maximal_toDual
@[simp] theorem minimal_false : ¬ Minimal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_false : ¬ Maximal (fun _ ↦ False) x := by
simp [Maximal]
@[simp] theorem minimal_true : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMin x := by
simp [IsMin, Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_true : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ IsMax x :=
minimal_true (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Minimal (P ⊓ Q) x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp only [Minimal, Subtype.forall, Subtype.mk_le_mk, Pi.inf_apply, inf_Prop_eq]
tauto
@[simp] theorem maximal_subtype {x : Subtype Q} :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x.1) x ↔ Maximal (P ⊓ Q) x :=
minimal_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem maximal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Maximal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Maximal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Maximal, hx]
theorem minimal_true_subtype {x : Subtype P} : Minimal (fun _ ↦ True) x ↔ Minimal P x := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := x
simp [Minimal, hx]
@[simp] theorem minimal_minimal : Minimal (Minimal P) x ↔ Minimal P x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.prop, fun h ↦ ⟨h, fun _ hy hyx ↦ h.le_of_le hy.prop hyx⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem maximal_maximal : Maximal (Maximal P) x ↔ Maximal P x :=
minimal_minimal (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If `P` is down-closed, then minimal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally minimal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem minimal_iff_isMin (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → x ≤ y → P x) : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMin x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_le (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
/-- If `P` is up-closed, then maximal elements satisfying `P` are exactly the globally maximal
elements satisfying `P`. -/
theorem maximal_iff_isMax (hP : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, P y → y ≤ x → P x) : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ IsMax x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.prop, fun _ h' ↦ h.le_of_ge (hP h.prop h') h'⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ _ h' ↦ h.2 h'⟩⟩
theorem Minimal.mono (h : Minimal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_le (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Maximal.mono (h : Maximal P x) (hle : Q ≤ P) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal Q x :=
⟨hQ, fun y hQy ↦ h.le_of_ge (hle y hQy)⟩
theorem Minimal.and_right (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Minimal.and_left (h : Minimal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Minimal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
theorem Maximal.and_right (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (P x ∧ Q x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.left) ⟨h.prop, hQ⟩
theorem Maximal.and_left (h : Maximal P x) (hQ : Q x) : Maximal (fun x ↦ (Q x ∧ P x)) x :=
h.mono (fun _ ↦ And.right) ⟨hQ, h.prop⟩
@[simp] theorem minimal_eq_iff : Minimal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Minimal]
@[simp] theorem maximal_eq_iff : Maximal (· = y) x ↔ x = y := by
simp +contextual [Maximal]
theorem not_minimal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Minimal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ y ≤ x ∧ ¬ (x ≤ y) := by
simp [Minimal, hx]
theorem not_maximal_iff (hx : P x) : ¬ Maximal P x ↔ ∃ y, P y ∧ x ≤ y ∧ ¬ (y ≤ x) :=
not_minimal_iff (α := αᵒᵈ) hx
theorem Minimal.or (h : Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Minimal P x ∨ Minimal Q x := by
obtain ⟨h | h, hmin⟩ := h
· exact .inl ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inl hy) hyx⟩
exact .inr ⟨h, fun y hy hyx ↦ hmin (Or.inr hy) hyx⟩
theorem Maximal.or (h : Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∨ Q x) x) : Maximal P x ∨ Maximal Q x :=
Minimal.or (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Minimal P x) ∧ Q x := by
simp_rw [and_iff_left_of_imp (fun x ↦ hPQ x), iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ hPQ h.prop
theorem minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Minimal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Minimal P x) := by
simp_rw [iff_comm, and_comm, minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp hPQ, and_comm]
theorem maximal_and_iff_right_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ P x ∧ Q x) x ↔ (Maximal P x) ∧ Q x :=
minimal_and_iff_right_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
theorem maximal_and_iff_left_of_imp (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → Q x) :
Maximal (fun x ↦ Q x ∧ P x) x ↔ Q x ∧ (Maximal P x) :=
minimal_and_iff_left_of_imp (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem minimal_iff_forall_lt : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y < x → ¬ P y := by
simp [Minimal, lt_iff_le_not_le, not_imp_not, imp.swap]
theorem maximal_iff_forall_gt : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, x < y → ¬ P y :=
minimal_iff_forall_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Minimal.not_prop_of_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hlt : y < x) : ¬ P y :=
(minimal_iff_forall_lt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Maximal.not_prop_of_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hlt : x < y) : ¬ P y :=
(maximal_iff_forall_gt.1 h).2 hlt
theorem Minimal.not_lt (h : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (y < x) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_lt hlt hy
theorem Maximal.not_gt (h : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) : ¬ (x < y) :=
fun hlt ↦ h.not_prop_of_gt hlt hy
@[simp] theorem minimal_le_iff : Minimal (· ≤ y) x ↔ x ≤ y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans h)
@[simp] theorem maximal_ge_iff : Maximal (y ≤ ·) x ↔ y ≤ x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_le_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem minimal_lt_iff : Minimal (· < y) x ↔ x < y ∧ IsMin x :=
minimal_iff_isMin (fun _ _ h h' ↦ h'.trans_lt h)
@[simp] theorem maximal_gt_iff : Maximal (y < ·) x ↔ y < x ∧ IsMax x :=
minimal_lt_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem not_minimal_iff_exists_lt (hx : P x) : ¬ Minimal P x ↔ ∃ y, y < x ∧ P y := by
simp_rw [not_minimal_iff hx, lt_iff_le_not_le, and_comm]
alias ⟨exists_lt_of_not_minimal, _⟩ := not_minimal_iff_exists_lt
theorem not_maximal_iff_exists_gt (hx : P x) : ¬ Maximal P x ↔ ∃ y, x < y ∧ P y :=
not_minimal_iff_exists_lt (α := αᵒᵈ) hx
alias ⟨exists_gt_of_not_maximal, _⟩ := not_maximal_iff_exists_gt
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem Minimal.eq_of_ge (hx : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) (hge : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
(hx.2 hy hge).antisymm hge
theorem Minimal.eq_of_le (hx : Minimal P x) (hy : P y) (hle : y ≤ x) : y = x :=
(hx.eq_of_ge hy hle).symm
theorem Maximal.eq_of_le (hx : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) (hle : x ≤ y) : x = y :=
hle.antisymm <| hx.2 hy hle
theorem Maximal.eq_of_ge (hx : Maximal P x) (hy : P y) (hge : x ≤ y) : y = x :=
(hx.eq_of_le hy hge).symm
theorem minimal_iff : Minimal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, P y → y ≤ x → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_ge⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ hy hle ↦ (h.2 hy hle).le⟩⟩
theorem maximal_iff : Maximal P x ↔ P x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, P y → x ≤ y → x = y :=
minimal_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem minimal_mem_iff {s : Set α} : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → y ≤ x → x = y :=
minimal_iff
theorem maximal_mem_iff {s : Set α} : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≤ y → x = y :=
maximal_iff
/-- If `P y` holds, and everything satisfying `P` is above `y`, then `y` is the unique minimal
element satisfying `P`. -/
theorem minimal_iff_eq (hy : P y) (hP : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → y ≤ x) : Minimal P x ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.eq_of_ge hy (hP h.prop), by rintro rfl; exact ⟨hy, fun z hz _ ↦ hP hz⟩⟩
/-- If `P y` holds, and everything satisfying `P` is below `y`, then `y` is the unique maximal
element satisfying `P`. -/
theorem maximal_iff_eq (hy : P y) (hP : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → x ≤ y) : Maximal P x ↔ x = y :=
minimal_iff_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hy hP
@[simp] theorem minimal_ge_iff : Minimal (y ≤ ·) x ↔ x = y :=
minimal_iff_eq rfl.le fun _ ↦ id
@[simp] theorem maximal_le_iff : Maximal (· ≤ y) x ↔ x = y :=
maximal_iff_eq rfl.le fun _ ↦ id
theorem minimal_iff_minimal_of_imp_of_forall (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, Q x → P x)
(h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → ∃ y, y ≤ x ∧ Q y) : Minimal P x ↔ Minimal Q x := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ⟨?_, fun y hy hyx ↦ h'.le_of_le (hPQ hy) hyx⟩,
fun h' ↦ ⟨hPQ h'.prop, fun y hy hyx ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ := h h'.prop
rwa [((h'.le_of_le (hPQ hy)) hyx).antisymm hyx]
obtain ⟨z, hzy, hz⟩ := h hy
exact (h'.le_of_le hz (hzy.trans hyx)).trans hzy
theorem maximal_iff_maximal_of_imp_of_forall (hPQ : ∀ ⦃x⦄, Q x → P x)
(h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, P x → ∃ y, x ≤ y ∧ Q y) : Maximal P x ↔ Maximal Q x :=
minimal_iff_minimal_of_imp_of_forall (α := αᵒᵈ) hPQ h
end PartialOrder
section Subset
variable {P : Set α → Prop} {s t : Set α}
theorem Minimal.eq_of_superset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) (hts : t ⊆ s) : s = t :=
h.eq_of_ge ht hts
theorem Maximal.eq_of_subset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s = t :=
h.eq_of_le ht hst
theorem Minimal.eq_of_subset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) (hts : t ⊆ s) : t = s :=
h.eq_of_le ht hts
theorem Maximal.eq_of_superset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : t = s :=
h.eq_of_ge ht hst
theorem minimal_subset_iff : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → s = t :=
_root_.minimal_iff
theorem maximal_subset_iff : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → s = t :=
_root_.maximal_iff
theorem minimal_subset_iff' : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem maximal_subset_iff' : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_minimal_subset_iff (hs : P s) : ¬ Minimal P s ↔ ∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ P t :=
not_minimal_iff_exists_lt hs
theorem not_maximal_subset_iff (hs : P s) : ¬ Maximal P s ↔ ∃ t, s ⊂ t ∧ P t :=
not_maximal_iff_exists_gt hs
theorem Set.minimal_iff_forall_ssubset : Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊂ s → ¬ P t :=
minimal_iff_forall_lt
theorem Minimal.not_prop_of_ssubset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : t ⊂ s) : ¬ P t :=
(minimal_iff_forall_lt.1 h).2 ht
theorem Minimal.not_ssubset (h : Minimal P s) (ht : P t) : ¬ t ⊂ s :=
h.not_lt ht
theorem Maximal.mem_of_prop_insert (h : Maximal P s) (hx : P (insert x s)) : x ∈ s :=
h.eq_of_subset hx (subset_insert _ _) ▸ mem_insert ..
theorem Minimal.not_mem_of_prop_diff_singleton (h : Minimal P s) (hx : P (s \ {x})) : x ∉ s :=
fun hxs ↦ ((h.eq_of_superset hx diff_subset).subset hxs).2 rfl
theorem Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → P s) :
Minimal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ P (s \ {x}) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ hx hP ↦ h.not_mem_of_prop_diff_singleton hP hx⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun _ ht hts x hxs ↦ by_contra fun hxt ↦
h.2 x hxs (hP ht <| subset_diff_singleton hts hxt)⟩⟩
theorem Set.exists_diff_singleton_of_not_minimal (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → t ⊆ s → P s) (hs : P s)
(h : ¬ Minimal P s) : ∃ x ∈ s, P (s \ {x}) := by
simpa [Set.minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton hP, hs] using h
theorem Set.maximal_iff_forall_ssuperset : Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ ⦃t⦄, s ⊂ t → ¬ P t :=
maximal_iff_forall_gt
theorem Maximal.not_prop_of_ssuperset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : s ⊂ t) : ¬ P t :=
(maximal_iff_forall_gt.1 h).2 ht
theorem Maximal.not_ssuperset (h : Maximal P s) (ht : P t) : ¬ s ⊂ t :=
h.not_gt ht
theorem Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → P s) :
Maximal P s ↔ P s ∧ ∀ x ∉ s, ¬ P (insert x s) := by
simp only [not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun x ↦ h.mem_of_prop_insert⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun t ht hst x hxt ↦ h.2 x (hP ht <| insert_subset hxt hst)⟩⟩
theorem Set.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (hP : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, P t → s ⊆ t → P s) (hs : P s)
(h : ¬ Maximal P s) : ∃ x ∉ s, P (insert x s) := by
simpa [Set.maximal_iff_forall_insert hP, hs] using h
/- TODO : generalize `minimal_iff_forall_diff_singleton` and `maximal_iff_forall_insert`
to `IsStronglyCoatomic`/`IsStronglyAtomic` orders. -/
end Subset
section Set
variable {s t : Set α}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem setOf_minimal_subset (s : Set α) : {x | Minimal (· ∈ s) x} ⊆ s :=
sep_subset ..
theorem setOf_maximal_subset (s : Set α) : {x | Maximal (· ∈ s) x} ⊆ s :=
sep_subset ..
theorem Set.Subsingleton.maximal_mem_iff (h : s.Subsingleton) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s := by
obtain (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) := h.eq_empty_or_singleton <;> simp
theorem Set.Subsingleton.minimal_mem_iff (h : s.Subsingleton) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s := by
obtain (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) := h.eq_empty_or_singleton <;> simp
theorem IsLeast.minimal (h : IsLeast s x) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x :=
⟨h.1, fun _b hb _ ↦ h.2 hb⟩
theorem IsGreatest.maximal (h : IsGreatest s x) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x :=
⟨h.1, fun _b hb _ ↦ h.2 hb⟩
theorem IsAntichain.minimal_mem_iff (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) s) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.prop, fun h ↦ ⟨h, fun _ hys hyx ↦ (hs.eq hys h hyx).symm.le⟩⟩
theorem IsAntichain.maximal_mem_iff (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) s) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x ∈ s :=
hs.to_dual.minimal_mem_iff
/-- If `t` is an antichain shadowing and including the set of maximal elements of `s`,
then `t` *is* the set of maximal elements of `s`. -/
theorem IsAntichain.eq_setOf_maximal (ht : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) t)
(h : ∀ x, Maximal (· ∈ s) x → x ∈ t) (hs : ∀ a ∈ t, ∃ b, b ≤ a ∧ Maximal (· ∈ s) b) :
{x | Maximal (· ∈ s) x} = t := by
refine Set.ext fun x ↦ ⟨h _, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hy⟩ := hs x hx
rwa [← ht.eq (h y hy) hx hyx]
/-- If `t` is an antichain shadowed by and including the set of minimal elements of `s`,
then `t` *is* the set of minimal elements of `s`. -/
theorem IsAntichain.eq_setOf_minimal (ht : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) t)
(h : ∀ x, Minimal (· ∈ s) x → x ∈ t) (hs : ∀ a ∈ t, ∃ b, a ≤ b ∧ Minimal (· ∈ s) b) :
{x | Minimal (· ∈ s) x} = t :=
ht.to_dual.eq_setOf_maximal h hs
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem setOf_maximal_antichain (P : α → Prop) : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) {x | Maximal P x} :=
fun _ hx _ ⟨hy, _⟩ hne hle ↦ hne (hle.antisymm <| hx.2 hy hle)
theorem setOf_minimal_antichain (P : α → Prop) : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) {x | Minimal P x} :=
(setOf_maximal_antichain (α := αᵒᵈ) P).swap
theorem IsLeast.minimal_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : Minimal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.eq_of_ge h.1 (h.2 h'.prop), fun h' ↦ h' ▸ h.minimal⟩
theorem IsGreatest.maximal_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : Maximal (· ∈ s) x ↔ x = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.eq_of_le h.1 (h.2 h'.prop), fun h' ↦ h' ▸ h.maximal⟩
end PartialOrder
end Set
section Image
variable [Preorder α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
section Function
variable {f : α → β}
theorem minimal_mem_image_monotone (hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y))
(hx : Minimal (· ∈ s) x) : Minimal (· ∈ f '' s) (f x) := by
refine ⟨mem_image_of_mem f hx.prop, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [hf hx.prop hy, hf hy hx.prop]
exact hx.le_of_le hy
theorem maximal_mem_image_monotone (hf : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → (f x ≤ f y ↔ x ≤ y))
| (hx : Maximal (· ∈ s) x) : Maximal (· ∈ f '' s) (f x) :=
minimal_mem_image_monotone (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (s := s) (fun _ _ hx hy ↦ hf hy hx) hx
theorem minimal_mem_image_monotone_iff (ha : a ∈ s)
| Mathlib/Order/Minimal.lean | 435 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials over a ring
Many results about polynomials hold when the coefficient ring is a commutative semiring.
Some stronger results can be derived when we assume this semiring is a ring.
This file does not define any new operations, but proves some of these stronger results.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommRing R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
instance instCommRingMvPolynomial : CommRing (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable (σ a a')
@[simp]
theorem C_sub : (C (a - a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a - C a' :=
RingHom.map_sub _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_neg : (C (-a) : MvPolynomial σ R) = -C a :=
RingHom.map_neg _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_neg (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (-p) = -coeff m p :=
Finsupp.neg_apply _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sub (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p - q) = coeff m p - coeff m q :=
Finsupp.sub_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem support_neg : (-p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_neg p
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p - q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_sub
variable {σ} (p)
section Degrees
@[simp]
theorem degrees_neg (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (-p).degrees = p.degrees := by
rw [degrees, support_neg]; rfl
theorem degrees_sub_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p - q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ∪ q.degrees := by
simpa [degrees_def] using AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_sub_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sub := degrees_sub_le
end Degrees
section Degrees
| @[simp]
theorem degreeOf_neg (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : degreeOf i (-p) = degreeOf i p := by
rw [degreeOf, degreeOf, degrees_neg]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/CommRing.lean | 100 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,646 | 1,671 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
|
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 432 | 434 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohanad ahmed. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-! # Block Matrices from Rows and Columns
This file provides the basic definitions of matrices composed from columns and rows.
The concatenation of two matrices with the same row indices can be expressed as
`A = fromCols A₁ A₂` the concatenation of two matrices with the same column indices
can be expressed as `B = fromRows B₁ B₂`.
We then provide a few lemmas that deal with the products of these with each other and
with block matrices
## Tags
column matrices, row matrices, column row block matrices
-/
namespace Matrix
variable {R : Type*}
variable {m m₁ m₂ n n₁ n₂ : Type*}
/-- Concatenate together two matrices A₁[m₁ × N] and A₂[m₂ × N] with the same columns (N) to get a
bigger matrix indexed by [(m₁ ⊕ m₂) × N] -/
def fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R :=
of (Sum.elim A₁ A₂)
/-- Concatenate together two matrices B₁[m × n₁] and B₂[m × n₂] with the same rows (M) to get a
bigger matrix indexed by [m × (n₁ ⊕ n₂)] -/
def fromCols (B₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (B₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R :=
of fun i => Sum.elim (B₁ i) (B₂ i)
/-- Given a column partitioned matrix extract the first column -/
def toCols₁ (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) : Matrix m n₁ R := of fun i j => (A i (Sum.inl j))
/-- Given a column partitioned matrix extract the second column -/
def toCols₂ (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) : Matrix m n₂ R := of fun i j => (A i (Sum.inr j))
/-- Given a row partitioned matrix extract the first row -/
def toRows₁ (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) : Matrix m₁ n R := of fun i j => (A (Sum.inl i) j)
/-- Given a row partitioned matrix extract the second row -/
def toRows₂ (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) : Matrix m₂ n R := of fun i j => (A (Sum.inr i) j)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns := fromCols
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁ := toCols₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₂ := toCols₂
@[simp]
lemma fromRows_apply_inl (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) (i : m₁) (j : n) :
(fromRows A₁ A₂) (Sum.inl i) j = A₁ i j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma fromRows_apply_inr (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) (i : m₂) (j : n) :
(fromRows A₁ A₂) (Sum.inr i) j = A₂ i j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma fromCols_apply_inl (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) (i : m) (j : n₁) :
(fromCols A₁ A₂) i (Sum.inl j) = A₁ i j := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_apply_inl := fromCols_apply_inl
@[simp]
lemma fromCols_apply_inr (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) (i : m) (j : n₂) :
(fromCols A₁ A₂) i (Sum.inr j) = A₂ i j := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_apply_inr := fromCols_apply_inr
@[simp]
lemma toRows₁_apply (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) (i : m₁) (j : n) :
(toRows₁ A) i j = A (Sum.inl i) j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₂_apply (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) (i : m₂) (j : n) :
(toRows₂ A) i j = A (Sum.inr i) j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₁_fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) :
toRows₁ (fromRows A₁ A₂) = A₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₂_fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) :
toRows₂ (fromRows A₁ A₂) = A₂ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toCols₁_apply (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) (i : m) (j : n₁) :
(toCols₁ A) i j = A i (Sum.inl j) := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁_apply := toCols₁_apply
@[simp]
lemma toCols₂_apply (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) (i : m) (j : n₂) :
(toCols₂ A) i j = A i (Sum.inr j) := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₂_apply := toCols₂_apply
@[simp]
lemma toCols₁_fromCols (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) :
toCols₁ (fromCols A₁ A₂) = A₁ := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁_fromColumns := toCols₁_fromCols
| @[simp]
lemma toCols₂_fromCols (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) :
toCols₂ (fromCols A₁ A₂) = A₂ := rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/ColumnRowPartitioned.lean | 109 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
dsimp only [zero]
subsingleton
instance [HasZeroObject V] : HasZeroObject (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨⟨zero, isZero_zero⟩⟩
noncomputable instance [HasZeroObject V] : Inhabited (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨zero⟩
theorem congr_hom {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} {f g : C ⟶ D} (w : f = g) (i : ι) :
f.f i = g.f i :=
congr_fun (congr_arg Hom.f w) i
lemma mono_of_mono_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)) : Mono φ where
right_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_mono (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
lemma epi_of_epi_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Epi (φ.f i)) : Epi φ where
left_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_epi (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
section
variable (V c)
/-- The functor picking out the `i`-th object of a complex. -/
@[simps]
def eval (i : ι) : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ V where
obj C := C.X i
map f := f.f i
instance (i : ι) : (eval V c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
/-- The functor forgetting the differential in a complex, obtaining a graded object. -/
@[simps]
def forget : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ GradedObject ι V where
obj C := C.X
map f := f.f
instance : (forget V c).Faithful where
map_injective h := by
ext i
exact congr_fun h i
/-- Forgetting the differentials than picking out the `i`-th object is the same as
just picking out the `i`-th object. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetEval (i : ι) : forget V c ⋙ GradedObject.eval i ≅ eval V c i :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
end
noncomputable section
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ φ.f n' := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n' ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ φ.f n := by subst h; simp
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i j'` are both allowed, then we must have `j = j'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem d_comp_eqToHom {i j j' : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i j') :
C.d i j' ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.next_eq rij' rij)) = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i' j` are both allowed, then we must have `i = i'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem eqToHom_comp_d {i i' j : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i' j) :
eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.prev_eq rij rij')) ≫ C.d i' j = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
theorem kernel_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j j' : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) (r' : c.Rel i j') :
kernelSubobject (C.d i j) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j') := by
rw [← d_comp_eqToHom C r r']
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i i' j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j)
(r' : c.Rel i' j) : imageSubobject (C.d i j) = imageSubobject (C.d i' j) := by
rw [← eqToHom_comp_d C r r']
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
section
/-- Either `C.X i`, if there is some `i` with `c.Rel i j`, or `C.X j`. -/
abbrev xPrev (j : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.prev j)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xPrevIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.prev_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `i` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xPrevIsoSelf {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.prev]
rw [dif_neg]
push_neg; intro i hi
have : c.prev j = i := c.prev_eq' hi
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
| /-- Either `C.X j`, if there is some `j` with `c.rel i j`, or `C.X i`. -/
abbrev xNext (i : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.next i)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 411 | 414 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Slope of a function
In this file we define the slope of a function `f : k → PE` taking values in an affine space over
`k` and prove some basic theorems about `slope`. The `slope` function naturally appears in the Mean
Value Theorem, and in the proof of the fact that a function with nonnegative second derivative on an
interval is convex on this interval.
## Tags
affine space, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*} [Field k] [AddCommGroup E] [Module k E] [AddTorsor E PE]
/-- `slope f a b = (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a)` is the slope of a function `f` on the interval
`[a, b]`. Note that `slope f a a = 0`, not the derivative of `f` at `a`. -/
def slope (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : E :=
(b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a)
theorem slope_fun_def (f : k → PE) : slope f = fun a b => (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a) :=
rfl
theorem slope_def_field (f : k → k) (a b : k) : slope f a b = (f b - f a) / (b - a) :=
(div_eq_inv_mul _ _).symm
theorem slope_fun_def_field (f : k → k) (a : k) : slope f a = fun b => (f b - f a) / (b - a) :=
(div_eq_inv_mul _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem slope_same (f : k → PE) (a : k) : (slope f a a : E) = 0 := by
rw [slope, sub_self, inv_zero, zero_smul]
theorem slope_def_module (f : k → E) (a b : k) : slope f a b = (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b - f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_smul_slope (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : (b - a) • slope f a b = f b -ᵥ f a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sub_self, zero_smul, vsub_self]
· rw [slope, smul_inv_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 hne.symm)]
theorem sub_smul_slope_vadd (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : (b - a) • slope f a b +ᵥ f a = f b := by
rw [sub_smul_slope, vsub_vadd]
| @[simp]
theorem slope_vadd_const (f : k → E) (c : PE) : (slope fun x => f x +ᵥ c) = slope f := by
ext a b
simp only [slope, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right, vsub_eq_sub]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Slope.lean | 56 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 833 | 835 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms between them.
The definition of a measurable space is in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of subsets closed under
complementation and countable union. A function between measurable spaces is measurable if
the preimage of each measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂`
if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`).
In particular, any collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which contains
all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection between the lattices of σ-algebras
on `α` and `β`.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is defined in terms of the
Galois connection induced by `f`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, dynkin system, π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open Set MeasureTheory
universe uι
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort uι} {s : Set α}
namespace MeasurableSpace
section Functors
variable {m m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : Set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace α) : MeasurableSpace β where
MeasurableSet' s := MeasurableSet[m] <| f ⁻¹' s
measurableSet_empty := m.measurableSet_empty
measurableSet_compl _ hs := m.measurableSet_compl _ hs
measurableSet_iUnion f hf := by simpa only [preimage_iUnion] using m.measurableSet_iUnion _ hf
lemma map_def {s : Set β} : MeasurableSet[m.map f] s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] (f ⁻¹' s) := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : m.map id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : Set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace β) : MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' s := ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s
measurableSet_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurableSet_empty, rfl⟩
measurableSet_compl := fun _ ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurableSet_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
measurableSet_iUnion s hs :=
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := Classical.axiom_of_choice hs
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun i => (hs' i).left, by simp [hs']⟩
lemma measurableSet_comap {m : MeasurableSpace β} :
MeasurableSet[m.comap f] s ↔ ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s := .rfl
theorem comap_eq_generateFrom (m : MeasurableSpace β) (f : α → β) :
m.comap f = generateFrom { t | ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ f ⁻¹' s = t } :=
(@generateFrom_measurableSet _ (.comap f m)).symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun s => ⟨fun ⟨_, hs', h⟩ => h ▸ hs', fun h => ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩ => ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, fun ⟨t, h, ht⟩ => ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨fun h _s hs => h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, heq⟩ => heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
theorem gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (MeasurableSpace.comap f) (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ =>
comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
theorem monotone_map : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ => map_mono
theorem comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
theorem monotone_comap : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.comap g) := fun _ _ h => comap_mono h
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : (⊥ : MeasurableSpace α).comap g = ⊥ :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_iSup {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨆ i, m i).comap g = ⨆ i, (m i).comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top : (⊤ : MeasurableSpace α).map f = ⊤ :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp]
theorem map_iInf {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨅ i, m i).map f = ⨅ i, (m i).map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_iInf
theorem comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m :=
(gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
theorem le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g :=
(gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end Functors
@[simp] theorem map_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.map (fun _a : α ↦ b) m = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| fun s _ ↦ by rw [map_def]; by_cases h : b ∈ s <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem comap_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.comap (fun _a : α => b) m = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| by rintro _ ⟨s, -, rfl⟩; by_cases b ∈ s <;> simp [*]
theorem comap_generateFrom {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} :
(generateFrom s).comap f = generateFrom (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <|
generateFrom_le fun _t hts => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ <| mem_image_of_mem _ <| hts)
(generateFrom_le fun _t ⟨u, hu, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ ⟨u, GenerateMeasurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end MeasurableSpace
section MeasurableFunctions
open MeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Measurable.le_map, Measurable.of_le_map⟩ := measurable_iff_le_map
theorem measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias ⟨Measurable.comap_le, Measurable.of_comap_le⟩ := measurable_iff_comap_le
theorem comap_measurable {m : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) : Measurable[m.comap f] f :=
fun s hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
theorem Measurable.mono {ma ma' : MeasurableSpace α} {mb mb' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @Measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) : @Measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
fun _t ht => ha _ <| hf <| hb _ ht
lemma Measurable.iSup' {mα : ι → MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} (i₀ : ι)
(h : Measurable[mα i₀] f) :
Measurable[⨆ i, mα i] f :=
h.mono (le_iSup mα i₀) le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_left {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_left le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_right {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα'] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_right le_rfl
theorem measurable_id'' {m mα : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ mα) : @Measurable α α mα m id :=
measurable_id.mono le_rfl hm
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_from_top [MeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} : Measurable[⊤] f := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem measurable_generateFrom [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t)) : @Measurable _ _ _ (generateFrom s) f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <| generateFrom_le h
variable {f g : α → β}
section TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurable [Subsingleton α] : Measurable f := fun _ _ =>
@Subsingleton.measurableSet α _ _ _
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
fun s _ => Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
@[to_additive (attr := measurability, fun_prop)]
theorem measurable_one [One α] : Measurable (1 : β → α) :=
@measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
theorem measurable_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
Subsingleton.measurable
theorem measurable_of_empty_codomain [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
theorem measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : Measurable f := by
nontriviality β
inhabit β
convert @measurable_const α β _ _ (f default) using 2
apply hf
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_natCast [NatCast α] (n : ℕ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_intCast [IntCast α] (n : ℤ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
theorem measurable_of_countable [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) :
Measurable f := fun s _ =>
(f ⁻¹' s).to_countable.measurableSet
theorem measurable_of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_countable f
end TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : Measurable f) : ∀ n, Measurable f^[n]
| 0 => measurable_id
| n + 1 => (Measurable.iterate hf n).comp hf
variable {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage {t : Set β} (hf : Measurable f) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
protected theorem MeasurableSet.preimage {t : Set β} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability, fun_prop]
protected theorem Measurable.piecewise {_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable (piecewise s f g) := by
intro t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage]
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
/-- This is slightly different from `Measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`Measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact Measurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `Measurable.ite` by `Measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
theorem Measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a })
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
Measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.indicator [Zero β] (hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
/-- The measurability of a set `A` is equivalent to the measurability of the indicator function
which takes a constant value `b ≠ 0` on a set `A` and `0` elsewhere. -/
lemma measurable_indicator_const_iff [Zero β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
Measurable (s.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
constructor <;> intro h
· convert h (MeasurableSet.singleton (0 : β)).compl
ext a
simp [NeZero.ne b]
· exact measurable_const.indicator h
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem measurableSet_mulSupport [One β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (Function.mulSupport f) :=
hf (measurableSet_singleton 1).compl
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hf : Measurable f)
(h : Set.Countable { x | f x ≠ g x }) : Measurable g := by
intro t ht
have : g ⁻¹' t = g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x }ᶜ ∪ g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x } := by
simp [← inter_union_distrib_left]
rw [this]
refine (h.mono inter_subset_right).measurableSet.union ?_
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } = f ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } := by
ext x
simp +contextual
rw [this]
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurableSet.of_compl
end MeasurableFunctions
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generateFrom_prod_eq`. -/
def IsCountablySpanning (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ
theorem isCountablySpanning_measurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCountablySpanning { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } :=
⟨fun _ => univ, fun _ => MeasurableSet.univ, iUnion_const _⟩
/-- Rectangles of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
lemma IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Basic.lean | 666 | 668 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Infinite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file contains some results about prime numbers which depend on finiteness of sets.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable {a b k m n p : ℕ}
/-- A version of `Nat.exists_infinite_primes` using the `Set.Infinite` predicate. -/
theorem infinite_setOf_prime : { p | Prime p }.Infinite :=
Set.infinite_of_not_bddAbove not_bddAbove_setOf_prime
instance Primes.infinite : Infinite Primes := infinite_setOf_prime.to_subtype
instance Primes.countable : Countable Primes := ⟨⟨coeNat.coe, coe_nat_injective⟩⟩
/-- The prime factors of a natural number as a finset. -/
def primeFactors (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := n.primeFactorsList.toFinset
@[simp] lemma toFinset_factors (n : ℕ) : n.primeFactorsList.toFinset = n.primeFactors := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_primeFactors : p ∈ n.primeFactors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [← toFinset_factors, List.mem_toFinset, mem_primeFactorsList']
|
lemma mem_primeFactors_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∈ n.primeFactors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PrimeFin.lean | 37 | 38 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
| theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 676 | 679 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : ℕ → α} {m : ℕ}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· simp [Set.preimage, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_dom
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {b : β} : StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one [One β] : StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) := stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
section aux
omit [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete`. -/
private noncomputable def simpleFuncAux (f : α → β) (g : ℕ → α) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β
| 0 => .const _ (f (g 0))
| n + 1 => .piecewise {g n} (.singleton _) (.const _ <| f (g n)) (simpleFuncAux f g n)
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt : ∀ n > m, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m)
| _, .refl => by simp [simpleFuncAux]
| _, Nat.le.step (m := n) hmn => by
obtain hnm | hnm := eq_or_ne (g n) (g m) <;>
simp [simpleFuncAux, Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem , hnm.symm, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt _ hmn]
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m) :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨_, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt⟩
end aux
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete [Countable α] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
nontriviality β
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_surjective_nat α
exact ⟨simpleFuncAux f g, hg.forall.2 fun m ↦
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq⟩
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete (since := "2025-04-09")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] : StronglyMeasurable f := .of_discrete
end StronglyMeasurable
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq, ← Finset.mem_coe]
classical
refine fun n => measure_biUnion_lt_top {y ∈ (fs n).range | y ≠ 0}.finite_toSet fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
protected theorem prodMk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prodMk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] protected alias prod_mk := StronglyMeasurable.prodMk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_right
protected theorem prod_swap {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β × α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
protected theorem fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_fst
protected theorem snd [mα : MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk stronglyMeasurable_const)
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Max β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Min β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : IsClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.injective.preimage_image] at this
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· lift x to s using hxs
simp [Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
· lift x to t using (h trivial).resolve_left hxs
rw [extend_apply', Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
exact fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ hxs <| hy ▸ y.2
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : StronglyMeasurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : StronglyMeasurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁
h₂
@[measurability]
protected theorem indicator {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant indicator functions of measurable sets and that it is closed under
addition and pointwise limit.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction with`. -/
theorem induction [MeasurableSpace α] [AddZeroClass β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(ind : ∀ c ⦃s : Set α⦄ (hs : MeasurableSet s),
P (s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) (stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator hs))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hfg : StronglyMeasurable (f + g)), Disjoint f.support g.support →
P f hf → P g hg → P (f + g) hfg)
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n using SimpleFunc.induction with
| const c hs => exact ind c hs
| @add f g h_supp hf hg =>
exact add f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable (f + g).stronglyMeasurable h_supp hf hg
open scoped Classical in
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant functions and that it is closed under piecewise combination of functions
and pointwise limits.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction' with`. -/
theorem induction' [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c), P (fun _ ↦ c) stronglyMeasurable_const)
(pcw : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ {s} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s), P f hf → P g hg → P (s.piecewise f g) (hf.piecewise hs hg))
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n with
| const c => exact const c
| @pcw f g s hs Pf Pg =>
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact pcw f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable hs Pf Pg
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem dist {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f g : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => dist (f x) (g x) :=
continuous_dist.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[measurability]
protected theorem norm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
@[measurability]
protected theorem nnnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
/-- The `enorm` of a strongly measurable function is measurable.
Unlike `StrongMeasurable.norm` and `StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm`, this lemma proves measurability,
**not** strong measurability. This is an intentional decision: for functions taking values in
ℝ≥0∞, measurability is much more useful than strong measurability. -/
@[fun_prop, measurability]
protected theorem enorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
{f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf.nnnorm).measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ennnorm := StronglyMeasurable.enorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem real_toNNReal {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x).toNNReal :=
continuous_real_toNNReal.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
section PseudoMetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Preorder E] [OrderClosedTopology E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_le (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a ≤ g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_le_prod.measurableSet
lemma measurableSet_lt (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a < g a} := by
simpa only [lt_iff_le_not_le] using (hf.measurableSet_le hg).inter (hg.measurableSet_le hf).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyLE, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_le hg).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end PseudoMetrizableSpace
section MetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [MetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a = g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_diagonal.measurableSet
lemma ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_eq_fun hg).compl
lemma ae_eq_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end MetrizableSpace
theorem stronglyMeasurable_in_set {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {s : Set α}
{f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hf_zero : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) :
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β,
(∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))) ∧ ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, fs n x = 0 := by
let g_seq_s : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n => (hf.approx n).restrict s
have hg_eq : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = hf.approx n x := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_mem hx]
have hg_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = 0 := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine ⟨g_seq_s, fun x => ?_, hg_zero⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp_rw [hg_eq x hx]
exact hf.tendsto_approx x
· simp_rw [hg_zero x hx, hf_zero x hx]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` supported
on `s` is `m`-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also `m₂`-strongly-measurable. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E} {m m₂ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] {s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hf_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 0) :
StronglyMeasurable[m₂] f := by
have hs_m₂ : MeasurableSet[m₂] s := by
rw [← Set.inter_univ s]
refine hs Set.univ ?_
rwa [Set.inter_univ]
obtain ⟨g_seq_s, hg_seq_tendsto, hg_seq_zero⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_in_set hs_m hf hf_zero
let g_seq_s₂ : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m₂ E := fun n =>
{ toFun := g_seq_s n
measurableSet_fiber' := fun x => by
rw [← Set.inter_univ (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x}), ← Set.union_compl_self s,
Set.inter_union_distrib_left, Set.inter_comm (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x})]
refine MeasurableSet.union (hs _ (hs_m.inter ?_)) ?_
· exact @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber _ _ m _ _
by_cases hx : x = 0
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = sᶜ by
rw [this]
exact hs_m₂.compl
ext1 y
rw [hx, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨hg_seq_zero y h n, h⟩⟩
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = ∅ by
rw [this]
exact MeasurableSet.empty
ext1 y
simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_compl_iff,
mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and, not_not_mem]
refine Function.mtr fun hys => ?_
rw [hg_seq_zero y hys n]
exact Ne.symm hx
finite_range' := @SimpleFunc.finite_range _ _ m (g_seq_s n) }
exact ⟨g_seq_s₂, hg_seq_tendsto⟩
/-- If a function `f` is strongly measurable w.r.t. a sub-σ-algebra `m` and the measure is σ-finite
on `m`, then there exists spanning measurable sets with finite measure on which `f` has bounded
norm. In particular, `f` is integrable on each of those sets. -/
theorem exists_spanning_measurableSet_norm_le [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∃ s : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet[m] (s n) ∧ μ (s n) < ∞ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s n, ‖f x‖ ≤ n) ∧
⋃ i, s i = Set.univ := by
obtain ⟨s, hs, hs_univ⟩ :=
@exists_spanning_measurableSet_le _ m _ hf.nnnorm.measurable (μ.trim hm) _
refine ⟨s, fun n ↦ ⟨(hs n).1, (le_trim hm).trans_lt (hs n).2.1, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩, hs_univ⟩
have hx_nnnorm : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ n := (hs n).2.2 x hx
rw [← coe_nnnorm]
norm_cast
end StronglyMeasurable
/-! ## Finitely strongly measurable functions -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_zero {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [Zero β]
[TopologicalSpace β] : FinStronglyMeasurable (0 : α → β) μ :=
⟨0, by
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, support_zero', measure_empty,
zero_lt_top, forall_const],
fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
namespace FinStronglyMeasurable
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β}
section sequence
variable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that `∀ x, Tendsto (fun n ↦ hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`
and `∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞`. These properties are given by
`FinStronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx` and `FinStronglyMeasurable.fin_support_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx : ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem fin_support_approx : ∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞ :=
hf.choose_spec.1
protected theorem tendsto_approx : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec.2
end sequence
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨hf.approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
theorem exists_set_sigmaFinite [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := by
rcases hf with ⟨fs, hT_lt_top, h_approx⟩
let T n := support (fs n)
have hT_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (T n) := fun n => SimpleFunc.measurableSet_support (fs n)
let t := ⋃ n, T n
refine ⟨t, MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas, ?_, ?_⟩
· have h_fs_zero : ∀ n, ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists] at hxt
simpa [T] using hxt n
refine fun x hxt => tendsto_nhds_unique (h_approx x) ?_
rw [funext fun n => h_fs_zero n x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
· refine ⟨⟨⟨fun n => tᶜ ∪ T n, fun _ => trivial, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩
· rw [Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas), Set.union_inter_distrib_right,
Set.compl_inter_self t, Set.empty_union]
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt (hT_lt_top n)
· rw [← Set.union_iUnion tᶜ T]
exact Set.compl_union_self _
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
protected theorem measurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : Measurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.measurable
section Arithmetic
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem mul [MulZeroClass β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f * g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
intro n
exact (measure_mono (support_mul_subset_left _ _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem add [AddZeroClass β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f + g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n + hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_add _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).add (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem neg [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousNeg β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (-f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => -hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).neg⟩
suffices μ (Function.support fun x => -(hf.approx n) x) < ∞ by convert this
rw [Function.support_neg (hf.approx n)]
exact hf.fin_support_approx n
@[measurability]
protected theorem sub [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousSub β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f - g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n - hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_sub _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).sub (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Zero β]
[SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (c • f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_smul]
exact (measure_mono (support_const_smul_subset c _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
end Arithmetic
section Order
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [SemilatticeSup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_sup _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [SemilatticeInf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_inf _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
end Order
end FinStronglyMeasurable
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_stronglyMeasurable_and_exists_set_sigmaFinite {α β} {f : α → β}
[TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β] [Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔
StronglyMeasurable f ∧
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.stronglyMeasurable, hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite⟩, fun hf =>
hf.1.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite hf.2.choose_spec.1 hf.2.choose_spec.2.1
hf.2.choose_spec.2.2⟩
section SecondCountableTopology
variable {G : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
[SecondCountableTopology G] {f : α → G}
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, `FinStronglyMeasurable`
and `Measurable` are equivalent. -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => (Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h).finStronglyMeasurable μ⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, a measurable function
is `FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] (hf : Measurable f) : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable μ).mpr hf
end SecondCountableTopology
theorem measurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_measurable {α β ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OpensMeasurableSpace ι]
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x)
(h : ∀ i, Measurable (u i)) : Measurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_meas : Measurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, @measurable_swap_iff α (↥(t_sf n).range) β m]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => h j
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_meas.comp (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
theorem stronglyMeasurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_stronglyMeasurable {α β ι : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OpensMeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace α]
{u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x) (h : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (u i)) :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
borelize β
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, measurable_swap_iff]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => (h j).measurable
· have : IsSeparable (⋃ i : (t_sf n).range, range (u i)) :=
.iUnion fun i => (h i).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨⟨i, x⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_range]
exact ⟨i, x, rfl⟩
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_str_meas.comp_measurable (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 1,582 | 1,590 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Joey van Langen, Casper Putz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Frobenius
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
/-!
# Results about characteristic p reduced rings
-/
open Finset
section
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsReduced R] (p n : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
theorem iterateFrobenius_inj : Function.Injective (iterateFrobenius R p n) := fun x y H ↦ by
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at H ⊢
| simp_rw [iterateFrobenius_def, ← sub_pow_expChar_pow] at H
exact IsReduced.eq_zero _ ⟨_, H⟩
theorem frobenius_inj : Function.Injective (frobenius R p) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/Reduced.lean | 22 | 25 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
| rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 85 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
|
end RCLike
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 822 | 824 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
#s = #((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) := by rw [this]
_ = #(range n).attach := ?_
_ = #(range n) := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : #s = #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #s.attach := card_attach.symm
_ = #(s.attach.image fun a ↦ i a.1 a.2) := Eq.symm ?_
_ = #t := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : #s = #t := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : #s = #t :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : #s = #t :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : #s = #t := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
#s = #t := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
lemma card_le_card_of_injOn (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn f) :
#s ≤ #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #(s.image f) := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ #t := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {f : s → t} (hf : f.Injective) : #s ≤ #t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩
· simp
· classical
let f' : α → β := fun a => f (if ha : a ∈ s then ⟨a, ha⟩ else ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩)
apply card_le_card_of_injOn f'
· aesop
· intro a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂ haa
rw [mem_coe] at ha₁ ha₂
simp only [f', ha₁, ha₂, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at haa
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (hf haa)
lemma card_le_card_of_surjOn (f : α → β) (hf : Set.SurjOn f s t) : #t ≤ #s := by
classical unfold Set.SurjOn at hf; exact (card_le_card (mod_cast hf)).trans card_image_le
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : #t < #s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_injOn f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ #s :=
calc
n = #(range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ #s := card_le_card_of_injOn f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa)
lemma surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hinj : Set.InjOn f s)
(hst : #t ≤ #s) : Set.SurjOn f s t := by
classical
suffices s.image f = t by simp [← this, Set.SurjOn]
have : s.image f ⊆ t := by aesop (add simp Finset.subset_iff)
exact eq_of_subset_of_card_le this (hst.trans_eq (card_image_of_injOn hinj).symm)
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : #t ≤ #s) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hinj' : Set.InjOn f' s.attach := fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ Subtype.ext (hinj _ _ x.2 y.2 hxy)
have hmapsto' : Set.MapsTo f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ hf _ _
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le _ hmapsto' hinj' (by rwa [card_attach]) hb
exact ⟨a, a.2, rfl⟩
lemma injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hsurj : Set.SurjOn f s t)
(hst : #s ≤ #t) : Set.InjOn f s := by
classical
have : s.image f = t := Finset.coe_injective <| by simp [hsurj.image_eq_of_mapsTo hf]
have : #(s.image f) = #t := by rw [this]
have : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := card_image_le
rw [← card_image_iff]
omega
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : #s ≤ #t) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hsurj' : Set.SurjOn f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ by simpa [f'] using hsurj x hx
have hinj' := injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le f' (fun x hx ↦ hf _ _) hsurj' (by simpa)
exact congrArg Subtype.val (@hinj' ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ (by simp) ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (by simp) ha₁a₂)
end bij
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : #(s.disjUnion t h) = #s + #t :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∪ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm _ 1]
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t := by rw [Nat.add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∩ t) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) ≤ #s + #t :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) = #t - #s := by
suffices #(t \ s) = #(t \ s ∪ s) - #s by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) + #s = #t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : #t - #s ≤ #(t \ s) :=
calc
#t - #s ≤ #t - #(s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = #(t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ #(t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : #s ≤ #(s \ t) + #t :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
theorem card_sdiff_add_card (s t : Finset α) : #(s \ t) + #t = #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : #s = #t) : #(s \ t) = #(t \ s) :=
Nat.add_right_cancel (m := #t) <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
theorem sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : (t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (card_le_card h')
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s := by
classical simpa [Finset.Nonempty] using sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card h
@[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s \ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter]
@[simp]
lemma card_inter_add_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s \ t) = #s := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_sdiff_add_card_inter]
/-- **Pigeonhole principle** for two finsets inside an ambient finset. -/
theorem inter_nonempty_of_card_lt_card_add_card (hts : t ⊆ s) (hus : u ⊆ s)
(hstu : #s < #t + #u) : (t ∩ u).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hstu
calc
_ = #(t ∪ u) := by simp [← card_union_add_card_inter, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.1 hstu]
_ ≤ #s := by gcongr; exact union_subset hts hus
end Lattice
theorem filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
(p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
#(s.filter p) + #(s.filter fun a ↦ ¬ p a) = #s := by
classical
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : #s ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ #t) :
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ #u = n := by
classical
refine Nat.decreasingInduction' ?_ hnt ⟨t, by simp [hst]⟩
intro k _ hnk ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : (u \ s).Nonempty := by rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff hu₁]; omega
simp only [mem_sdiff] at ha
exact ⟨u.erase a, by simp [subset_erase, erase_subset_iff_of_mem (hu₂ _), *]⟩
/-- We can shrink a set to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_subset_card_eq (hns : n ≤ #s) : ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.empty_subset (by simp) hns
theorem le_card_iff_exists_subset_card : n ≤ #s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, hst, ht⟩ => ht ▸ card_le_card hst⟩
exact exists_subset_card_eq h
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card [DecidableEq α] {X Y : Finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hXY : 2 * n < #(X ∪ Y)) : ∃ C : Finset α, n < #C ∧ (C ⊆ X ∨ C ⊆ Y) := by
have h₁ : #(X ∩ (Y \ X)) = 0 := Finset.card_eq_zero.mpr (Finset.inter_sdiff_self X Y)
have h₂ : #(X ∪ Y) = #X + #(Y \ X) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter X (Y \ X), Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union, h₁, Nat.add_zero]
rw [h₂, Nat.two_mul] at hXY
obtain h | h : n < #X ∨ n < #(Y \ X) := by contrapose! hXY; omega
· exact ⟨X, h, Or.inl (Finset.Subset.refl X)⟩
· exact ⟨Y \ X, h, Or.inr sdiff_subset⟩
/-! ### Explicit description of a finset from its card -/
theorem card_eq_one : #s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
cases s
simp only [Multiset.card_eq_one, Finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
theorem exists_eq_insert_iff [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ #s + 1 = #t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨subset_insert _ _, (card_insert_of_not_mem ha).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨hst, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, t \ s = {a} :=
card_eq_one.1 (by rw [card_sdiff hst, ← h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
refine
⟨a, fun hs => (?_ : a ∉ {a}) <| mem_singleton_self _, by
rw [insert_eq, ← ha, sdiff_union_of_subset hst]⟩
rw [← ha]
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hs
theorem card_le_one : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b := by
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
refine (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (card_pos.2 ⟨x, hx⟩)).le_iff_eq.trans (card_eq_one.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp
· exact fun h => ⟨x, eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hx, fun y hy => h _ hy _ hx⟩⟩
theorem card_le_one_iff : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ {a b}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [card_le_one]
tauto
theorem card_le_one_iff_subsingleton_coe : #s ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton (s : Type _) :=
card_le_one.trans (s : Set α).subsingleton_coe.symm
theorem card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton [Nonempty α] : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ x : α, s ⊆ {x} := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary α, empty_subset _⟩
· exact ⟨x, fun y hy => by rw [card_le_one.1 H y hy x hx, mem_singleton]⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← card_singleton x]
exact card_le_card hx
lemma exists_mem_ne (hs : 1 < #s) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
have : Nonempty α := ⟨a⟩
by_contra!
exact hs.not_le (card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton.2 ⟨a, subset_singleton_iff'.2 this⟩)
/-- A `Finset` of a subsingleton type has cardinality at most one. -/
theorem card_le_one_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ 1 :=
Finset.card_le_one_iff.2 fun {_ _ _ _} => Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem one_lt_card : 1 < #s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact card_le_one
theorem one_lt_card_iff : 1 < #s ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [one_lt_card]
simp only [exists_prop, exists_and_left]
theorem one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial : 1 < #s ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Finset.Nontrivial, ← Set.nontrivial_coe_sort,
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, card_le_one_iff_subsingleton_coe, coe_sort_coe]
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hs : 1 < #s) (a : α) : ∃ b, b ∈ s ∧ b ≠ a := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := Finset.one_lt_card.mp hs
by_cases ha : y = a
· exact ⟨x, hx, ne_of_ne_of_eq hxy ha⟩
· exact ⟨y, hy, ha⟩
/-- If a Finset in a Pi type is nontrivial (has at least two elements), then
its projection to some factor is nontrivial, and the fibers of the projection
are proper subsets. -/
lemma exists_of_one_lt_card_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, DecidableEq (α i)]
{s : Finset (∀ i, α i)} (h : 1 < #s) :
∃ i, 1 < #(s.image (· i)) ∧ ∀ ai, s.filter (· i = ai) ⊂ s := by
simp_rw [one_lt_card_iff, Function.ne_iff] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨a1, a2, h1, h2, i, hne⟩ := h
refine ⟨i, ⟨_, _, mem_image_of_mem _ h1, mem_image_of_mem _ h2, hne⟩, fun ai => ?_⟩
rw [filter_ssubset]
obtain rfl | hne := eq_or_ne (a2 i) ai
exacts [⟨a1, h1, hne⟩, ⟨a2, h2, hne⟩]
theorem card_eq_succ_iff_cons :
#s = n + 1 ↔ ∃ a t, ∃ (h : a ∉ t), cons a t h = s ∧ #t = n :=
⟨cons_induction_on s (by simp) fun a s _ _ _ => ⟨a, s, by simp_all⟩,
fun ⟨a, t, _, hs, _⟩ => by simpa [← hs]⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_eq_succ : #s = n + 1 ↔ ∃ a t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ #t = n :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a, has⟩ := card_pos.mp (h.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _ : 0 < #s)
⟨a, s.erase a, s.not_mem_erase a, insert_erase has, by
simp only [h, card_erase_of_mem has, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]⟩,
fun ⟨_, _, hat, s_eq, n_eq⟩ => s_eq ▸ n_eq ▸ card_insert_of_not_mem hat⟩
theorem card_eq_two : #s = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
constructor
· rw [card_eq_succ]
simp_rw [card_eq_one]
rintro ⟨a, _, hab, rfl, b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, b, not_mem_singleton.1 hab, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h, rfl⟩
exact card_pair h
theorem card_eq_three : #s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
constructor
· rw [card_eq_succ]
simp_rw [card_eq_two]
rintro ⟨a, _, abc, rfl, b, c, bc, rfl⟩
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton, not_or] at abc
exact ⟨a, b, c, abc.1, abc.2, bc, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, z, xy, xz, yz, rfl⟩
simp only [xy, xz, yz, mem_insert, card_insert_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, mem_singleton,
or_self_iff, card_singleton]
end DecidableEq
theorem two_lt_card_iff : 2 < #s ↔ ∃ a b c, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ c ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
classical
simp_rw [lt_iff_add_one_le, le_card_iff_exists_subset_card, reduceAdd, card_eq_three,
← exists_and_left, exists_comm (α := Finset α)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, c, t, hsub, hab, hac, hbc, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, b, c, by simp_all [insert_subset_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, c, ha, hb, hc, hab, hac, hbc⟩
exact ⟨a, b, c, {a, b, c}, by simp_all [insert_subset_iff]⟩
theorem two_lt_card : 2 < #s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ s, ∃ c ∈ s, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
| simp_rw [two_lt_card_iff, exists_and_left]
/-! ### Inductions -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 723 | 726 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
| · rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 834 | 836 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,851 | 1,853 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Dvr
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
/-!
# Criteria under which a Dedekind domain is a PID
This file contains some results that we can use to test whether all ideals in a Dedekind domain are
principal.
## Main results
* `Ideal.IsPrincipal.of_finite_maximals_of_isUnit`: an invertible ideal in a commutative ring
with finitely many maximal ideals, is a principal ideal.
* `IsPrincipalIdealRing.of_finite_primes`: if a Dedekind domain has finitely many prime ideals,
it is a principal ideal domain.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
open Ideal
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
/-- Let `P` be a prime ideal, `x ∈ P \ P²` and `x ∉ Q` for all prime ideals `Q ≠ P`.
Then `P` is generated by `x`. -/
theorem Ideal.eq_span_singleton_of_mem_of_not_mem_sq_of_not_mem_prime_ne {P : Ideal R}
(hP : P.IsPrime) [IsDedekindDomain R] {x : R} (x_mem : x ∈ P) (hxP2 : x ∉ P ^ 2)
(hxQ : ∀ Q : Ideal R, IsPrime Q → Q ≠ P → x ∉ Q) : P = Ideal.span {x} := by
letI := Classical.decEq (Ideal R)
have hx0 : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact hxP2 (zero_mem _)
by_cases hP0 : P = ⊥
· subst hP0
rwa [eq_comm, span_singleton_eq_bot, ← mem_bot]
have hspan0 : span ({x} : Set R) ≠ ⊥ := mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp hx0
have span_le := (Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _).mpr x_mem
refine
associated_iff_eq.mp
((associated_iff_normalizedFactors_eq_normalizedFactors hP0 hspan0).mpr
(le_antisymm ((dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors hP0 hspan0).mp ?_) ?_))
· rwa [Ideal.dvd_iff_le, Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem]
simp only [normalizedFactors_irreducible (Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP0 hP).irreducible,
normalize_eq, Multiset.le_iff_count, Multiset.count_singleton]
intro Q
split_ifs with hQ
· subst hQ
refine (Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq ?_ ?_).le <;>
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, pow_one] <;>
assumption
by_cases hQp : IsPrime Q
· refine (Ideal.count_normalizedFactors_eq ?_ ?_).le <;>
-- Porting note: included `zero_add` in the simp arguments
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, zero_add, pow_one, pow_zero, one_eq_top,
Submodule.mem_top]
exact hxQ _ hQp hQ
· exact
(Multiset.count_eq_zero.mpr fun hQi =>
hQp
(isPrime_of_prime
(irreducible_iff_prime.mp (irreducible_of_normalized_factor _ hQi)))).le
-- Porting note: replaced three implicit coercions of `I` with explicit `(I : Submodule R A)`
theorem FractionalIdeal.isPrincipal_of_unit_of_comap_mul_span_singleton_eq_top {R A : Type*}
[CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} [IsLocalization S A]
(I : (FractionalIdeal S A)ˣ) {v : A} (hv : v ∈ (↑I⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal S A))
(h : Submodule.comap (Algebra.linearMap R A) ((I : Submodule R A) * Submodule.span R {v}) = ⊤) :
| Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R A) := by
have hinv := I.mul_inv
set J := Submodule.comap (Algebra.linearMap R A) ((I : Submodule R A) * Submodule.span R {v})
have hJ : IsLocalization.coeSubmodule A J = ↑I * Submodule.span R {v} := by
-- Porting note: had to insert `val_eq_coe` into this rewrite.
-- Arguably this is because `Subtype.ext_iff` is breaking the `FractionalIdeal` API.
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, val_eq_coe, coe_mul, val_eq_coe, coe_one] at hinv
apply Submodule.map_comap_eq_self
rw [← Submodule.one_eq_range, ← hinv]
exact Submodule.mul_le_mul_right ((Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _ _).2 hv)
have : (1 : A) ∈ ↑I * Submodule.span R {v} := by
rw [← hJ, h, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top, Submodule.mem_one]
exact ⟨1, (algebraMap R _).map_one⟩
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw⟩ := Submodule.mem_mul_span_singleton.1 this
refine ⟨⟨w, ?_⟩⟩
rw [← FractionalIdeal.coe_spanSingleton S, ← inv_inv I, eq_comm]
refine congr_arg coeToSubmodule (Units.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (le_antisymm ?_ ?_))
· conv_rhs => rw [← hinv, mul_comm]
apply FractionalIdeal.mul_le_mul_left (FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.mpr hw)
· rw [FractionalIdeal.one_le, ← hvw, mul_comm]
exact FractionalIdeal.mul_mem_mul (FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton_self _ _) hv
/--
An invertible fractional ideal of a commutative ring with finitely many maximal ideals is principal.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/PID.lean | 78 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.Basic
/-! # Tangent bundles
This file defines the tangent bundle as a `C^n` vector bundle.
Let `M` be a manifold with model `I` on `(E, H)`. The tangent space `TangentSpace I (x : M)` has
already been defined as a type synonym for `E`, and the tangent bundle `TangentBundle I M` as an
abbrev of `Bundle.TotalSpace E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _)`.
In this file, when `M` is `C^1`, we construct a vector bundle structure
on `TangentBundle I M` using the `VectorBundleCore` construction indexed by the charts of `M`
with fibers `E`. Given two charts `i, j : PartialHomeomorph M H`, the coordinate change
between `i` and `j` at a point `x : M` is the derivative of the composite
```
I.symm i.symm j I
E -----> H -----> M --> H --> E
```
within the set `range I ⊆ E` at `I (i x) : E`.
This defines a vector bundle `TangentBundle` with fibers `TangentSpace`.
## Main definitions and results
* `tangentBundleCore I M` is the vector bundle core for the tangent bundle over `M`.
* When `M` is a `C^{n+1}` manifold, `TangentBundle I M` has a `C^n` vector bundle
structure over `M`. In particular, it is a topological space, a vector bundle, a fiber bundle,
and a `C^n` manifold.
-/
open Bundle Set IsManifold PartialHomeomorph ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped Manifold Topology Bundle ContDiff
noncomputable section
section General
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for tangent spaces: the derivative of a coordinate change between two charts is
`C^n` on its source. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change [IsManifold I (n + 1) M]
(i j : atlas H M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fderivWithin 𝕜 (j.1.extend I ∘ (i.1.extend I).symm) (range I))
((i.1.extend I).symm ≫ j.1.extend I).source := by
have h : ((i.1.extend I).symm ≫ j.1.extend I).source ⊆ range I := by
rw [i.1.extend_coord_change_source]; apply image_subset_range
intro x hx
refine (ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right ?_ I.uniqueDiffOn le_rfl
<| h hx).mono h
refine (PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change (subset_maximalAtlas j.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas i.2) x hx).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact i.1.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin j.1 hx
open IsManifold
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
variable (I M) in
/-- Let `M` be a `C^1` manifold with model `I` on `(E, H)`.
Then `tangentBundleCore I M` is the vector bundle core for the tangent bundle over `M`.
It is indexed by the atlas of `M`, with fiber `E` and its change of coordinates from the chart `i`
to the chart `j` at point `x : M` is the derivative of the composite
```
I.symm i.symm j I
E -----> H -----> M --> H --> E
```
within the set `range I ⊆ E` at `I (i x) : E`. -/
@[simps indexAt coordChange]
def tangentBundleCore : VectorBundleCore 𝕜 M E (atlas H M) where
baseSet i := i.1.source
isOpen_baseSet i := i.1.open_source
indexAt := achart H
mem_baseSet_at := mem_chart_source H
coordChange i j x :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 (j.1.extend I ∘ (i.1.extend I).symm) (range I) (i.1.extend I x)
coordChange_self i x hx v := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq, fderivWithin_id', ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply]
· exact I.uniqueDiffWithinAt_image
· filter_upwards [i.1.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin hx] with y hy
exact (i.1.extend I).right_inv hy
· simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hx]
continuousOn_coordChange i j := by
have : IsManifold I (0 + 1) M := by simp; infer_instance
refine (contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change (n := 0) i j).continuousOn.comp
(i.1.continuousOn_extend.mono ?_) ?_
· rw [i.1.extend_source]; exact inter_subset_left
simp_rw [← i.1.extend_image_source_inter, mapsTo_image]
coordChange_comp := by
have : IsManifold I (0 + 1) M := by simp; infer_instance
rintro i j k x ⟨⟨hxi, hxj⟩, hxk⟩ v
rw [fderivWithin_fderivWithin, Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq]
· have := i.1.extend_preimage_mem_nhds (I := I) hxi (j.1.extend_source_mem_nhds (I := I) hxj)
filter_upwards [nhdsWithin_le_nhds this] with y hy
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, (j.1.extend I).left_inv hy]
· simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hxi, j.1.extend_left_inv hxj]
· exact (contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' (subset_maximalAtlas k.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas j.2) hxk hxj).differentiableWithinAt le_rfl
· exact (contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' (subset_maximalAtlas j.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas i.2) hxj hxi).differentiableWithinAt le_rfl
· intro x _; exact mem_range_self _
· exact I.uniqueDiffWithinAt_image
· rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hxi]
-- Porting note: moved to a separate `simp high` lemma b/c `simp` can simplify the LHS
@[simp high]
theorem tangentBundleCore_baseSet (i) : (tangentBundleCore I M).baseSet i = i.1.source := rfl
theorem tangentBundleCore_coordChange_achart (x x' z : M) :
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H x) (achart H x') z =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (extChartAt I x' ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x z) :=
rfl
section tangentCoordChange
variable (I) in
/-- In a manifold `M`, given two preferred charts indexed by `x y : M`, `tangentCoordChange I x y`
is the family of derivatives of the corresponding change-of-coordinates map. It takes junk values
outside the intersection of the sources of the two charts.
Note that this definition takes advantage of the fact that `tangentBundleCore` has the same base
sets as the preferred charts of the base manifold. -/
abbrev tangentCoordChange (x y : M) : M → E →L[𝕜] E :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H x) (achart H y)
lemma tangentCoordChange_def {x y z : M} : tangentCoordChange I x y z =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (extChartAt I y ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x z) := rfl
lemma tangentCoordChange_self {x z : M} {v : E} (h : z ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
tangentCoordChange I x x z v = v := by
apply (tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange_self
rw [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
exact h
lemma tangentCoordChange_comp {w x y z : M} {v : E}
(h : z ∈ (extChartAt I w).source ∩ (extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) :
tangentCoordChange I x y z (tangentCoordChange I w x z v) = tangentCoordChange I w y z v := by
apply (tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange_comp
simp only [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
exact h
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_tangentCoordChange {x y z : M}
(h : z ∈ (extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) :
HasFDerivWithinAt ((extChartAt I y) ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (tangentCoordChange I x y z)
(range I) (extChartAt I x z) :=
have h' : extChartAt I x z ∈ ((extChartAt I x).symm ≫ (extChartAt I y)).source := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source'', PartialEquiv.symm_symm, PartialEquiv.symm_target]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h
((contDiffWithinAt_ext_coord_change y x h').differentiableWithinAt le_rfl).hasFDerivWithinAt
lemma continuousOn_tangentCoordChange (x y : M) : ContinuousOn (tangentCoordChange I x y)
((extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) := by
convert (tangentBundleCore I M).continuousOn_coordChange (achart H x) (achart H y) <;>
simp only [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
end tangentCoordChange
local notation "TM" => TangentBundle I M
section TangentBundleInstances
instance : TopologicalSpace TM :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).toTopologicalSpace
instance TangentSpace.fiberBundle : FiberBundle E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).fiberBundle
instance TangentSpace.vectorBundle : VectorBundle 𝕜 E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).vectorBundle
namespace TangentBundle
protected theorem chartAt (p : TM) :
chartAt (ModelProd H E) p =
((tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTriv (achart H p.1)).toPartialHomeomorph ≫ₕ
(chartAt H p.1).prod (PartialHomeomorph.refl E) :=
rfl
theorem chartAt_toPartialEquiv (p : TM) :
(chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).toPartialEquiv =
(tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv (achart H p.1) ≫
(chartAt H p.1).toPartialEquiv.prod (PartialEquiv.refl E) :=
rfl
theorem trivializationAt_eq_localTriv (x : M) :
trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x =
(tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTriv (achart H x) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_source (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).source =
π E (TangentSpace I) ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).source :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_target (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).target = (chartAt H x).source ×ˢ univ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_baseSet (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).baseSet = (chartAt H x).source :=
rfl
theorem trivializationAt_apply (x : M) (z : TM) :
trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x z =
(z.1, fderivWithin 𝕜 ((chartAt H x).extend I ∘ ((chartAt H z.1).extend I).symm) (range I)
((chartAt H z.1).extend I z.1) z.2) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_fst (x : M) (z : TM) : (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x z).1 = z.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_chart_source_iff (p q : TM) :
p ∈ (chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).source ↔ p.1 ∈ (chartAt H q.1).source := by
simp only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, mfld_simps]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_chart_target_iff (p : H × E) (q : TM) :
p ∈ (chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).target ↔ p.1 ∈ (chartAt H q.1).target := by
/- porting note: was
simp +contextual only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt,
and_iff_left_iff_imp, mfld_simps]
-/
simp only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, mfld_simps]
rw [PartialEquiv.prod_symm]
simp +contextual only [and_iff_left_iff_imp, mfld_simps]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_chartAt_fst (p q : TM) : ((chartAt (ModelProd H E) q) p).1 = chartAt H q.1 p.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_chartAt_symm_fst (p : H × E) (q : TM) :
((chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).symm p).1 = ((chartAt H q.1).symm : H → M) p.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt {b₀ b : M}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).continuousLinearMapAt 𝕜 b =
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H b) (achart H b₀) b :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_symmL {b₀ b : M}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).symmL 𝕜 b =
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H b₀) (achart H b) b :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).localTriv_symmL hb
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem coordChange_model_space (b b' x : F) :
(tangentBundleCore 𝓘(𝕜, F) F).coordChange (achart F b) (achart F b') x = 1 := by
simpa only [tangentBundleCore_coordChange, mfld_simps] using
fderivWithin_id uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem symmL_model_space (b b' : F) :
(trivializationAt F (TangentSpace 𝓘(𝕜, F)) b).symmL 𝕜 b' = (1 : F →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [TangentBundle.trivializationAt_symmL, coordChange_model_space]
apply mem_univ
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem continuousLinearMapAt_model_space (b b' : F) :
(trivializationAt F (TangentSpace 𝓘(𝕜, F)) b).continuousLinearMapAt 𝕜 b' = (1 : F →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [TangentBundle.trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt, coordChange_model_space]
apply mem_univ
end TangentBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
lemma tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff [h : IsManifold I (n + 1) M] :
haveI : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
(tangentBundleCore I M).IsContMDiff I n := by
have : IsManifold I n M := .of_le (n := n + 1) (le_self_add)
refine ⟨fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [contMDiffOn_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (subset_maximalAtlas i.2),
contMDiffOn_iff_contDiffOn]
· refine ((contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change (I := I) i j).congr fun x hx => ?_).mono ?_
· rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source'] at hx
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, tangentBundleCore_coordChange, (i.1.extend I).right_inv hx.1]
· exact (i.1.extend_image_source_inter j.1).subset
· apply inter_subset_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias tangentBundleCore.isSmooth := tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
lemma TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle [h : IsManifold I (n + 1) M] :
haveI : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
ContMDiffVectorBundle n E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
have : (tangentBundleCore I M).IsContMDiff I n := tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff
exact (tangentBundleCore I M).instContMDiffVectorBundle
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias TangentBundle.smoothVectorBundle := TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [h : IsManifold I ∞ M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle ∞ E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I (∞ + 1) M := h
exact TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [IsManifold I ω M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle ω E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I :=
TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [h : IsManifold I 2 M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle 1 E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I (1 + 1) M := h
exact TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
end TangentBundleInstances
/-! ## The tangent bundle to the model space -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_model_space_apply (p : TangentBundle I H) (x : H) :
trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x p = (p.1, p.2) := by
simp [TangentBundle.trivializationAt_apply]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (↑I ∘ ↑I.symm) (range I) (I p.proj) =
fderivWithin 𝕜 id (range I) (I p.proj) :=
fderivWithin_congr' (fun y hy ↦ by simp [hy]) (mem_range_self p.proj)
simp [this, fderivWithin_id (ModelWithCorners.uniqueDiffWithinAt_image I)]
/-- In the tangent bundle to the model space, the charts are just the canonical identification
between a product type and a sigma type, a.k.a. `TotalSpace.toProd`. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentBundle_model_space_chartAt (p : TangentBundle I H) :
(chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).toPartialEquiv = (TotalSpace.toProd H E).toPartialEquiv := by
ext x : 1
· ext; · rfl
exact (tangentBundleCore I H).coordChange_self (achart _ x.1) x.1 (mem_achart_source H x.1) x.2
· ext; · rfl
apply heq_of_eq
exact (tangentBundleCore I H).coordChange_self (achart _ x.1) x.1 (mem_achart_source H x.1) x.2
simp_rw [TangentBundle.chartAt, FiberBundleCore.localTriv,
FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv, VectorBundleCore.toFiberBundleCore_baseSet,
tangentBundleCore_baseSet]
simp only [mfld_simps]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentBundle_model_space_coe_chartAt (p : TangentBundle I H) :
⇑(chartAt (ModelProd H E) p) = TotalSpace.toProd H E := by
rw [← PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, tangentBundle_model_space_chartAt]; rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentBundle_model_space_coe_chartAt_symm (p : TangentBundle I H) :
((chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).symm : ModelProd H E → TangentBundle I H) =
(TotalSpace.toProd H E).symm := by
rw [← PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, PartialHomeomorph.symm_toPartialEquiv,
tangentBundle_model_space_chartAt]; rfl
theorem tangentBundleCore_coordChange_model_space (x x' z : H) :
(tangentBundleCore I H).coordChange (achart H x) (achart H x') z =
ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E := by
ext v; exact (tangentBundleCore I H).coordChange_self (achart _ z) z (mem_univ _) v
variable (I) in
/-- The canonical identification between the tangent bundle to the model space and the product,
as a homeomorphism. For the diffeomorphism version, see `tangentBundleModelSpaceDiffeomorph`. -/
def tangentBundleModelSpaceHomeomorph : TangentBundle I H ≃ₜ ModelProd H E :=
{ TotalSpace.toProd H E with
continuous_toFun := by
let p : TangentBundle I H := ⟨I.symm (0 : E), (0 : E)⟩
have : Continuous (chartAt (ModelProd H E) p) := by
| rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
convert (chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).continuousOn
simp only [TangentSpace.fiberBundle, mfld_simps]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/Tangent.lean | 389 | 391 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
| theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 358 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kyle Miller, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-! # `norm_num` extensions for GCD-adjacent functions
This module defines some `norm_num` extensions for functions such as
`Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, `Int.gcd`, and `Int.lcm`.
Note that `Nat.coprime` is reducible and defined in terms of `Nat.gcd`, so the `Nat.gcd` extension
also indirectly provides a `Nat.coprime` extension.
-/
namespace Tactic
namespace NormNum
|
theorem int_gcd_helper' {d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} (a b : ℤ) (h₁ : (d : ℤ) ∣ x) (h₂ : (d : ℤ) ∣ y)
(h₃ : x * a + y * b = d) : Int.gcd x y = d := by
refine Nat.dvd_antisymm ?_ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 (Int.dvd_coe_gcd h₁ h₂))
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← h₃]
apply dvd_add
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left.mul_right _
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/GCD.lean | 22 | 28 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Units
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Basic
/-!
# Rays in modules
This file defines rays in modules.
## Main definitions
* `SameRay`: two vectors belong to the same ray if they are proportional with a nonnegative
coefficient.
* `Module.Ray` is a type for the equivalence class of nonzero vectors in a module with some
common positive multiple.
-/
noncomputable section
section StrictOrderedCommSemiring
-- TODO: remove `[IsStrictOrderedRing R]` and `@[nolint unusedArguments]`.
/-- Two vectors are in the same ray if either one of them is zero or some positive multiples of them
are equal (in the typical case over a field, this means one of them is a nonnegative multiple of
the other). -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def SameRay (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
{M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (v₁ v₂ : M) : Prop :=
v₁ = 0 ∨ v₂ = 0 ∨ ∃ r₁ r₂ : R, 0 < r₁ ∧ 0 < r₂ ∧ r₁ • v₁ = r₂ • v₂
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι]
namespace SameRay
variable {x y z : M}
@[simp]
theorem zero_left (y : M) : SameRay R 0 y :=
Or.inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (x : M) : SameRay R x 0 :=
Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0]
exact zero_left _
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton R] (x y : M) : SameRay R x y :=
haveI := Module.subsingleton R M
of_subsingleton x y
/-- `SameRay` is reflexive. -/
@[refl]
theorem refl (x : M) : SameRay R x x := by
nontriviality R
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| ⟨1, 1, zero_lt_one, zero_lt_one, rfl⟩)
protected theorem rfl : SameRay R x x :=
refl _
/-- `SameRay` is symmetric. -/
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : SameRay R x y) : SameRay R y x :=
(or_left_comm.1 h).imp_right <| Or.imp_right fun ⟨r₁, r₂, h₁, h₂, h⟩ => ⟨r₂, r₁, h₂, h₁, h.symm⟩
/-- If `x` and `y` are nonzero vectors on the same ray, then there exist positive numbers `r₁ r₂`
such that `r₁ • x = r₂ • y`. -/
theorem exists_pos (h : SameRay R x y) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ r₁ r₂ : R, 0 < r₁ ∧ 0 < r₂ ∧ r₁ • x = r₂ • y :=
(h.resolve_left hx).resolve_left hy
theorem sameRay_comm : SameRay R x y ↔ SameRay R y x :=
⟨SameRay.symm, SameRay.symm⟩
/-- `SameRay` is transitive unless the vector in the middle is zero and both other vectors are
nonzero. -/
theorem trans (hxy : SameRay R x y) (hyz : SameRay R y z) (hy : y = 0 → x = 0 ∨ z = 0) :
SameRay R x z := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · exact zero_left z
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · exact zero_right x
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· exact (hy rfl).elim (fun h => (hx h).elim) fun h => (hz h).elim
rcases hxy.exists_pos hx hy with ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h₁⟩
rcases hyz.exists_pos hy hz with ⟨r₃, r₄, hr₃, hr₄, h₂⟩
refine Or.inr (Or.inr <| ⟨r₃ * r₁, r₂ * r₄, mul_pos hr₃ hr₁, mul_pos hr₂ hr₄, ?_⟩)
rw [mul_smul, mul_smul, h₁, ← h₂, smul_comm]
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [PartialOrder S]
[Algebra S R] [Module S M] [SMulPosMono S R]
[IsScalarTower S R M] {a : S}
/-- A vector is in the same ray as a nonnegative multiple of itself. -/
lemma sameRay_nonneg_smul_right (v : M) (h : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R v (a • v) := by
obtain h | h := (algebraMap_nonneg R h).eq_or_gt
· rw [← algebraMap_smul R a v, h, zero_smul]
exact zero_right _
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨algebraMap S R a, 1, h, by nontriviality R; exact zero_lt_one, ?_⟩
module
/-- A nonnegative multiple of a vector is in the same ray as that vector. -/
lemma sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (v : M) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R (a • v) v :=
(sameRay_nonneg_smul_right v ha).symm
/-- A vector is in the same ray as a positive multiple of itself. -/
lemma sameRay_pos_smul_right (v : M) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R v (a • v) :=
sameRay_nonneg_smul_right v ha.le
/-- A positive multiple of a vector is in the same ray as that vector. -/
lemma sameRay_pos_smul_left (v : M) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R (a • v) v :=
sameRay_nonneg_smul_left v ha.le
/-- A vector is in the same ray as a nonnegative multiple of one it is in the same ray as. -/
lemma nonneg_smul_right (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R x (a • y) :=
h.trans (sameRay_nonneg_smul_right y ha) fun hy => Or.inr <| by rw [hy, smul_zero]
/-- A nonnegative multiple of a vector is in the same ray as one it is in the same ray as. -/
lemma nonneg_smul_left (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : SameRay R (a • x) y :=
(h.symm.nonneg_smul_right ha).symm
/-- A vector is in the same ray as a positive multiple of one it is in the same ray as. -/
theorem pos_smul_right (h : SameRay R x y) (ha : 0 < a) : SameRay R x (a • y) :=
h.nonneg_smul_right ha.le
/-- A positive multiple of a vector is in the same ray as one it is in the same ray as. -/
theorem pos_smul_left (h : SameRay R x y) (hr : 0 < a) : SameRay R (a • x) y :=
h.nonneg_smul_left hr.le
/-- If two vectors are on the same ray then they remain so after applying a linear map. -/
theorem map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (h : SameRay R x y) : SameRay R (f x) (f y) :=
(h.imp fun hx => by rw [hx, map_zero]) <|
Or.imp (fun hy => by rw [hy, map_zero]) fun ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩ =>
⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, by rw [← f.map_smul, ← f.map_smul, h]⟩
/-- The images of two vectors under an injective linear map are on the same ray if and only if the
original vectors are on the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sameRay_map_iff
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [LinearMapClass F R M N]
{f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
SameRay R (f x) (f y) ↔ SameRay R x y := by
simp only [SameRay, map_zero, ← hf.eq_iff, map_smul]
/-- The images of two vectors under a linear equivalence are on the same ray if and only if the
original vectors are on the same ray. -/
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_map_iff (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : SameRay R (e x) (e y) ↔ SameRay R x y :=
Function.Injective.sameRay_map_iff (EquivLike.injective e)
/-- If two vectors are on the same ray then both scaled by the same action are also on the same
ray. -/
theorem smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass R S M]
(h : SameRay R x y) (s : S) : SameRay R (s • x) (s • y) :=
h.map (s • (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M))
/-- If `x` and `y` are on the same ray as `z`, then so is `x + y`. -/
theorem add_left (hx : SameRay R x z) (hy : SameRay R y z) : SameRay R (x + y) z := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx₀); · rwa [zero_add]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy₀); · rwa [add_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz₀); · apply zero_right
rcases hx.exists_pos hx₀ hz₀ with ⟨rx, rz₁, hrx, hrz₁, Hx⟩
rcases hy.exists_pos hy₀ hz₀ with ⟨ry, rz₂, hry, hrz₂, Hy⟩
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨rx * ry, ry * rz₁ + rx * rz₂, mul_pos hrx hry, ?_, ?_⟩)
· positivity
· convert congr(ry • $Hx + rx • $Hy) using 1 <;> module
/-- If `y` and `z` are on the same ray as `x`, then so is `y + z`. -/
theorem add_right (hy : SameRay R x y) (hz : SameRay R x z) : SameRay R x (y + z) :=
(hy.symm.add_left hz.symm).symm
end SameRay
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- Nonzero vectors, as used to define rays. This type depends on an unused argument `R` so that
`RayVector.Setoid` can be an instance. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def RayVector (R M : Type*) [Zero M] :=
{ v : M // v ≠ 0 }
instance RayVector.coe [Zero M] : CoeOut (RayVector R M) M where
coe := Subtype.val
instance {R M : Type*} [Zero M] [Nontrivial M] : Nonempty (RayVector R M) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
⟨⟨x, hx⟩⟩
variable (R M)
/-- The setoid of the `SameRay` relation for the subtype of nonzero vectors. -/
instance RayVector.Setoid : Setoid (RayVector R M) where
r x y := SameRay R (x : M) y
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => SameRay.refl _, fun h => h.symm, by
intros x y z hxy hyz
exact hxy.trans hyz fun hy => (y.2 hy).elim⟩
/-- A ray (equivalence class of nonzero vectors with common positive multiples) in a module. -/
def Module.Ray :=
Quotient (RayVector.Setoid R M)
variable {R M}
/-- Equivalence of nonzero vectors, in terms of `SameRay`. -/
theorem equiv_iff_sameRay {v₁ v₂ : RayVector R M} : v₁ ≈ v₂ ↔ SameRay R (v₁ : M) v₂ :=
Iff.rfl
variable (R)
/-- The ray given by a nonzero vector. -/
def rayOfNeZero (v : M) (h : v ≠ 0) : Module.Ray R M :=
⟦⟨v, h⟩⟧
/-- An induction principle for `Module.Ray`, used as `induction x using Module.Ray.ind`. -/
theorem Module.Ray.ind {C : Module.Ray R M → Prop} (h : ∀ (v) (hv : v ≠ 0), C (rayOfNeZero R v hv))
(x : Module.Ray R M) : C x :=
Quotient.ind (Subtype.rec <| h) x
variable {R}
instance [Nontrivial M] : Nonempty (Module.Ray R M) :=
Nonempty.map Quotient.mk' inferInstance
/-- The rays given by two nonzero vectors are equal if and only if those vectors
satisfy `SameRay`. -/
theorem ray_eq_iff {v₁ v₂ : M} (hv₁ : v₁ ≠ 0) (hv₂ : v₂ ≠ 0) :
rayOfNeZero R _ hv₁ = rayOfNeZero R _ hv₂ ↔ SameRay R v₁ v₂ :=
Quotient.eq'
/-- The ray given by a positive multiple of a nonzero vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem ray_pos_smul {v : M} (h : v ≠ 0) {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) (hrv : r • v ≠ 0) :
rayOfNeZero R (r • v) hrv = rayOfNeZero R v h :=
(ray_eq_iff _ _).2 <| SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_left v hr
/-- An equivalence between modules implies an equivalence between ray vectors. -/
def RayVector.mapLinearEquiv (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : RayVector R M ≃ RayVector R N :=
Equiv.subtypeEquiv e.toEquiv fun _ => e.map_ne_zero_iff.symm
/-- An equivalence between modules implies an equivalence between rays. -/
def Module.Ray.map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : Module.Ray R M ≃ Module.Ray R N :=
Quotient.congr (RayVector.mapLinearEquiv e) fun _ _=> (SameRay.sameRay_map_iff _).symm
@[simp]
theorem Module.Ray.map_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : M) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Module.Ray.map e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) = rayOfNeZero _ (e v) (e.map_ne_zero_iff.2 hv) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Module.Ray.map_refl : (Module.Ray.map <| LinearEquiv.refl R M) = Equiv.refl _ :=
Equiv.ext <| Module.Ray.ind R fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem Module.Ray.map_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : (Module.Ray.map e).symm = Module.Ray.map e.symm :=
rfl
section Action
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M]
/-- Any invertible action preserves the non-zeroness of ray vectors. This is primarily of interest
when `G = Rˣ` -/
instance {R : Type*} : MulAction G (RayVector R M) where
smul r := Subtype.map (r • ·) fun _ => (smul_ne_zero_iff_ne _).2
mul_smul a b _ := Subtype.ext <| mul_smul a b _
one_smul _ := Subtype.ext <| one_smul _ _
variable [SMulCommClass R G M]
/-- Any invertible action preserves the non-zeroness of rays. This is primarily of interest when
`G = Rˣ` -/
instance : MulAction G (Module.Ray R M) where
smul r := Quotient.map (r • ·) fun _ _ h => h.smul _
mul_smul a b := Quotient.ind fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk' <| mul_smul a b _
one_smul := Quotient.ind fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk' <| one_smul _ _
/-- The action via `LinearEquiv.apply_distribMulAction` corresponds to `Module.Ray.map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.Ray.linearEquiv_smul_eq_map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (v : Module.Ray R M) :
e • v = Module.Ray.map e v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_rayOfNeZero (g : G) (v : M) (hv) :
g • rayOfNeZero R v hv = rayOfNeZero R (g • v) ((smul_ne_zero_iff_ne _).2 hv) :=
rfl
end Action
namespace Module.Ray
/-- Scaling by a positive unit is a no-op. -/
theorem units_smul_of_pos (u : Rˣ) (hu : 0 < (u : R)) (v : Module.Ray R M) : u • v = v := by
induction v using Module.Ray.ind
rw [smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff]
exact SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_left _ hu
/-- An arbitrary `RayVector` giving a ray. -/
def someRayVector (x : Module.Ray R M) : RayVector R M :=
Quotient.out x
/-- The ray of `someRayVector`. -/
@[simp]
theorem someRayVector_ray (x : Module.Ray R M) : (⟦x.someRayVector⟧ : Module.Ray R M) = x :=
Quotient.out_eq _
/-- An arbitrary nonzero vector giving a ray. -/
def someVector (x : Module.Ray R M) : M :=
x.someRayVector
/-- `someVector` is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem someVector_ne_zero (x : Module.Ray R M) : x.someVector ≠ 0 :=
x.someRayVector.property
/-- The ray of `someVector`. -/
@[simp]
theorem someVector_ray (x : Module.Ray R M) : rayOfNeZero R _ x.someVector_ne_zero = x :=
(congr_arg _ (Subtype.coe_eta _ _) :).trans x.out_eq
end Module.Ray
end StrictOrderedCommSemiring
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M N : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R M] [Module R N] {x y : M}
/-- `SameRay.neg` as an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_neg_iff : SameRay R (-x) (-y) ↔ SameRay R x y := by
simp only [SameRay, neg_eq_zero, smul_neg, neg_inj]
alias ⟨SameRay.of_neg, SameRay.neg⟩ := sameRay_neg_iff
theorem sameRay_neg_swap : SameRay R (-x) y ↔ SameRay R x (-y) := by rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_neg]
theorem eq_zero_of_sameRay_neg_smul_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {r : R} (hr : r < 0)
(h : SameRay R x (r • x)) : x = 0 := by
rcases h with (rfl | h₀ | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩)
· rfl
· simpa [hr.ne] using h₀
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, smul_smul, ← sub_smul, smul_eq_zero] at h
refine h.resolve_left (ne_of_gt <| sub_pos.2 ?_)
exact (mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg hr₂ hr).trans hr₁
/-- If a vector is in the same ray as its negation, that vector is zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_sameRay_self_neg [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (h : SameRay R x (-x)) : x = 0 := by
nontriviality M; haveI : Nontrivial R := Module.nontrivial R M
refine eq_zero_of_sameRay_neg_smul_right (neg_lt_zero.2 (zero_lt_one' R)) ?_
rwa [neg_one_smul]
namespace RayVector
/-- Negating a nonzero vector. -/
instance {R : Type*} : Neg (RayVector R M) :=
⟨fun v => ⟨-v, neg_ne_zero.2 v.prop⟩⟩
/-- Negating a nonzero vector commutes with coercion to the underlying module. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg {R : Type*} (v : RayVector R M) : ↑(-v) = -(v : M) :=
rfl
/-- Negating a nonzero vector twice produces the original vector. -/
instance {R : Type*} : InvolutiveNeg (RayVector R M) where
neg := Neg.neg
neg_neg v := by rw [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_neg, coe_neg, neg_neg]
/-- If two nonzero vectors are equivalent, so are their negations. -/
@[simp]
theorem equiv_neg_iff {v₁ v₂ : RayVector R M} : -v₁ ≈ -v₂ ↔ v₁ ≈ v₂ :=
sameRay_neg_iff
end RayVector
variable (R)
/-- Negating a ray. -/
instance : Neg (Module.Ray R M) :=
⟨Quotient.map (fun v => -v) fun _ _ => RayVector.equiv_neg_iff.2⟩
/-- The ray given by the negation of a nonzero vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_rayOfNeZero (v : M) (h : v ≠ 0) :
-rayOfNeZero R _ h = rayOfNeZero R (-v) (neg_ne_zero.2 h) :=
rfl
namespace Module.Ray
variable {R}
/-- Negating a ray twice produces the original ray. -/
instance : InvolutiveNeg (Module.Ray R M) where
neg := Neg.neg
neg_neg x := by apply ind R (by simp) x
-- Quotient.ind (fun a => congr_arg Quotient.mk' <| neg_neg _) x
/-- A ray does not equal its own negation. -/
theorem ne_neg_self [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (x : Module.Ray R M) : x ≠ -x := by
induction x using Module.Ray.ind with | h x hx =>
rw [neg_rayOfNeZero, Ne, ray_eq_iff]
exact mt eq_zero_of_sameRay_self_neg hx
theorem neg_units_smul (u : Rˣ) (v : Module.Ray R M) : -u • v = -(u • v) := by
induction v using Module.Ray.ind
simp only [smul_rayOfNeZero, Units.smul_def, Units.val_neg, neg_smul, neg_rayOfNeZero]
/-- Scaling by a negative unit is negation. -/
theorem units_smul_of_neg (u : Rˣ) (hu : (u : R) < 0) (v : Module.Ray R M) : u • v = -v := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_neg, ← neg_units_smul, units_smul_of_pos]
rwa [Units.val_neg, Right.neg_pos_iff]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : Module.Ray R M) : map f (-v) = -map f v := by
induction v using Module.Ray.ind with | h g hg => simp
end Module.Ray
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
/-- `SameRay` follows from membership of `MulAction.orbit` for the `Units.posSubgroup`. -/
theorem sameRay_of_mem_orbit {v₁ v₂ : M} (h : v₁ ∈ MulAction.orbit (Units.posSubgroup R) v₂) :
SameRay R v₁ v₂ := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨r, hr : 0 < r.1⟩, rfl : r • v₂ = v₁⟩
exact SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_left _ hr
/-- Scaling by an inverse unit is the same as scaling by itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_smul (u : Rˣ) (v : Module.Ray R M) : u⁻¹ • v = u • v :=
have := mul_self_pos.2 u.ne_zero
calc
u⁻¹ • v = (u * u) • u⁻¹ • v := Eq.symm <| (u⁻¹ • v).units_smul_of_pos _ (by exact this)
_ = u • v := by rw [mul_smul, smul_inv_smul]
section
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_smul_right_iff {v : M} {r : R} : SameRay R v (r • v) ↔ 0 ≤ r ∨ v = 0 :=
⟨fun hrv => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hr => eq_zero_of_sameRay_neg_smul_right (not_le.1 hr) hrv,
or_imp.2 ⟨SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right v, fun h => h.symm ▸ SameRay.zero_left _⟩⟩
/-- A nonzero vector is in the same ray as a multiple of itself if and only if that multiple
is positive. -/
theorem sameRay_smul_right_iff_of_ne {v : M} (hv : v ≠ 0) {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
SameRay R v (r • v) ↔ 0 < r := by
simp only [sameRay_smul_right_iff, hv, or_false, hr.symm.le_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_smul_left_iff {v : M} {r : R} : SameRay R (r • v) v ↔ 0 ≤ r ∨ v = 0 :=
SameRay.sameRay_comm.trans sameRay_smul_right_iff
/-- A multiple of a nonzero vector is in the same ray as that vector if and only if that multiple
is positive. -/
theorem sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne {v : M} (hv : v ≠ 0) {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
SameRay R (r • v) v ↔ 0 < r :=
SameRay.sameRay_comm.trans (sameRay_smul_right_iff_of_ne hv hr)
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_neg_smul_right_iff {v : M} {r : R} : SameRay R (-v) (r • v) ↔ r ≤ 0 ∨ v = 0 := by
rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_neg, ← neg_smul, sameRay_smul_right_iff, neg_nonneg]
theorem sameRay_neg_smul_right_iff_of_ne {v : M} {r : R} (hv : v ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
SameRay R (-v) (r • v) ↔ r < 0 := by
simp only [sameRay_neg_smul_right_iff, hv, or_false, hr.le_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sameRay_neg_smul_left_iff {v : M} {r : R} : SameRay R (r • v) (-v) ↔ r ≤ 0 ∨ v = 0 :=
SameRay.sameRay_comm.trans sameRay_neg_smul_right_iff
theorem sameRay_neg_smul_left_iff_of_ne {v : M} {r : R} (hv : v ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) :
SameRay R (r • v) (-v) ↔ r < 0 :=
SameRay.sameRay_comm.trans <| sameRay_neg_smul_right_iff_of_ne hv hr
@[simp]
theorem units_smul_eq_self_iff {u : Rˣ} {v : Module.Ray R M} : u • v = v ↔ 0 < (u : R) := by
induction v using Module.Ray.ind with | h v hv =>
simp only [smul_rayOfNeZero, ray_eq_iff, Units.smul_def, sameRay_smul_left_iff_of_ne hv u.ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem units_smul_eq_neg_iff {u : Rˣ} {v : Module.Ray R M} : u • v = -v ↔ u.1 < 0 := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_neg, ← Module.Ray.neg_units_smul, units_smul_eq_self_iff, Units.val_neg,
neg_pos]
/-- Two vectors are in the same ray, or the first is in the same ray as the negation of the
second, if and only if they are not linearly independent. -/
theorem sameRay_or_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : M} :
SameRay R x y ∨ SameRay R x (-y) ↔ ¬LinearIndependent R ![x, y] := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simpa [hx] using fun h : LinearIndependent R ![0, y] => h.ne_zero 0 rfl
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simpa [hy] using fun h : LinearIndependent R ![x, 0] => h.ne_zero 1 rfl
simp_rw [Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ((hx0 | hy0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, _, h⟩) | (hx0 | hy0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, _, h⟩))
· exact False.elim (hx hx0)
· exact False.elim (hy hy0)
· refine ⟨![r₁, -r₂], ?_⟩
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.exists_fin_two]
simp [h, hr₁.ne.symm]
· exact False.elim (hx hx0)
· exact False.elim (hy (neg_eq_zero.1 hy0))
· refine ⟨![r₁, r₂], ?_⟩
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.exists_fin_two]
simp [h, hr₁.ne.symm]
· rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hmne⟩
rw [Fin.sum_univ_two, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at hm
dsimp only [Matrix.cons_val] at hm
rcases lt_trichotomy (m 0) 0 with (hm0 | hm0 | hm0) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy (m 1) 0 with (hm1 | hm1 | hm1)
· refine
Or.inr (Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨-m 0, -m 1, Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hm0, Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hm1, ?_⟩))
linear_combination (norm := module) -hm
· exfalso
simp [hm1, hx, hm0.ne] at hm
· refine Or.inl (Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨-m 0, m 1, Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hm0, hm1, ?_⟩))
linear_combination (norm := module) -hm
· exfalso
simp [hm0, hy, hm1.ne] at hm
· rw [Fin.exists_fin_two] at hmne
exact False.elim (not_and_or.2 hmne ⟨hm0, hm1⟩)
· exfalso
simp [hm0, hy, hm1.ne.symm] at hm
· refine Or.inl (Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨m 0, -m 1, hm0, Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hm1, ?_⟩))
rwa [neg_smul]
· exfalso
simp [hm1, hx, hm0.ne.symm] at hm
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨m 0, m 1, hm0, hm1, ?_⟩))
rwa [smul_neg]
/-- Two vectors are in the same ray, or they are nonzero and the first is in the same ray as the
negation of the second, if and only if they are not linearly independent. -/
theorem sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : M} :
SameRay R x y ∨ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay R x (-y) ↔ ¬LinearIndependent R ![x, y] := by
rw [← sameRay_or_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy]
end
end LinearOrderedCommRing
namespace SameRay
variable {R : Type*} [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {x y v₁ v₂ : M}
theorem exists_pos_left (h : SameRay R x y) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ r : R, 0 < r ∧ r • x = y :=
let ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩ := h.exists_pos hx hy
⟨r₂⁻¹ * r₁, mul_pos (inv_pos.2 hr₂) hr₁, by rw [mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀ hr₂.ne']⟩
theorem exists_pos_right (h : SameRay R x y) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
∃ r : R, 0 < r ∧ x = r • y :=
(h.symm.exists_pos_left hy hx).imp fun _ => And.imp_right Eq.symm
/-- If a vector `v₂` is on the same ray as a nonzero vector `v₁`, then it is equal to `c • v₁` for
some nonnegative `c`. -/
theorem exists_nonneg_left (h : SameRay R x y) (hx : x ≠ 0) : ∃ r : R, 0 ≤ r ∧ r • x = y := by
obtain rfl | hy := eq_or_ne y 0
· exact ⟨0, le_rfl, zero_smul _ _⟩
· exact (h.exists_pos_left hx hy).imp fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
/-- If a vector `v₁` is on the same ray as a nonzero vector `v₂`, then it is equal to `c • v₂` for
some nonnegative `c`. -/
| theorem exists_nonneg_right (h : SameRay R x y) (hy : y ≠ 0) : ∃ r : R, 0 ≤ r ∧ x = r • y :=
(h.symm.exists_nonneg_left hy).imp fun _ => And.imp_right Eq.symm
/-- If vectors `v₁` and `v₂` are on the same ray, then for some nonnegative `a b`, `a + b = 1`, we
have `v₁ = a • (v₁ + v₂)` and `v₂ = b • (v₁ + v₂)`. -/
theorem exists_eq_smul_add (h : SameRay R v₁ v₂) :
∃ a b : R, 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ v₁ = a • (v₁ + v₂) ∧ v₂ = b • (v₁ + v₂) := by
rcases h with (rfl | rfl | ⟨r₁, r₂, h₁, h₂, H⟩)
· use 0, 1
simp
· use 1, 0
simp
· have h₁₂ : 0 < r₁ + r₂ := add_pos h₁ h₂
refine
⟨r₂ / (r₁ + r₂), r₁ / (r₁ + r₂), div_nonneg h₂.le h₁₂.le, div_nonneg h₁.le h₁₂.le, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← add_div, add_comm, div_self h₁₂.ne']
· rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, smul_add, ← H, ← add_smul, add_comm r₂, inv_smul_smul₀ h₁₂.ne']
· rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, smul_add, H, ← add_smul, add_comm r₂, inv_smul_smul₀ h₁₂.ne']
/-- If vectors `v₁` and `v₂` are on the same ray, then they are nonnegative multiples of the same
vector. Actually, this vector can be assumed to be `v₁ + v₂`, see `SameRay.exists_eq_smul_add`. -/
theorem exists_eq_smul (h : SameRay R v₁ v₂) :
∃ (u : M) (a b : R), 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∧ a + b = 1 ∧ v₁ = a • u ∧ v₂ = b • u :=
⟨v₁ + v₂, h.exists_eq_smul_add⟩
end SameRay
section LinearOrderedField
variable {R : Type*} [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {x y : M}
theorem exists_pos_left_iff_sameRay (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(∃ r : R, 0 < r ∧ r • x = y) ↔ SameRay R x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.exists_pos_left hx hy⟩
rcases h with ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩
exact SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr
theorem exists_pos_left_iff_sameRay_and_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(∃ r : R, 0 < r ∧ r • x = y) ↔ SameRay R x y ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
constructor
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Ray.lean | 584 | 624 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
end equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
theorem mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal := mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage (hf : MapsTo f s t) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := hf
theorem mapsTo_iff_subset_preimage : MapsTo f s t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn => simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
lemma MapsTo.insert (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : α) : MapsTo f (insert x s) (insert (f x) t) := by
simpa [← singleton_union] using h.mono_right subset_union_right
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
end MapsTo
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
lemma InjOn.of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn f s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq ↦ h hx hy (by simp [heq])
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s ↔ InjOn g (f '' s) :=
⟨image_of_comp, fun h ↦ InjOn.comp h hf <| mapsTo_image f s⟩
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
theorem _root_.Set.InjOn.injective_iff (s : Set β) (h : InjOn g s) (hs : range f ⊆ s) :
Injective (g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨(·.of_comp), fun h _ ↦ by aesop⟩
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun _ hs _ ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (hB hs) (hB ht)).1 hst
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
lemma InjOn.image (h : s.InjOn f) : s.powerset.InjOn (image f) :=
fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ h' ↦ by rw [← h.preimage_image_inter hs₁, h', h.preimage_image_inter hs₂]
theorem InjOn.image_eq_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ = f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
h.image.eq_iff h₁ h₂
lemma InjOn.image_subset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊆ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ?_, image_subset _⟩
rw [← h.preimage_image_inter h₁, ← h.preimage_image_inter h₂]
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono h')
lemma InjOn.image_ssubset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊂ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := by
simp_rw [ssubset_def, h.image_subset_image_iff h₁ h₂, h.image_subset_image_iff h₂ h₁]
-- TODO: can this move to a better place?
theorem _root_.Disjoint.image {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : Disjoint s t) (hf : u.InjOn f)
(hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [← hf.image_inter hs ht, h, image_empty]
lemma InjOn.image_diff {t : Set α} (h : s.InjOn f) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' (s ∩ t) := by
refine subset_antisymm (subset_diff.2 ⟨image_subset f diff_subset, ?_⟩)
(diff_subset_iff.2 (by rw [← image_union, inter_union_diff]))
exact Disjoint.image disjoint_sdiff_inter h diff_subset inter_subset_left
lemma InjOn.image_diff_subset {f : α → β} {t : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t := by
rw [h.image_diff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
alias image_diff_of_injOn := InjOn.image_diff_subset
theorem InjOn.imageFactorization_injective (h : InjOn f s) :
Injective (s.imageFactorization f) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h' ↦ by simpa [imageFactorization, h.eq_iff hx hy] using h'
@[simp] theorem imageFactorization_injective_iff : Injective (s.imageFactorization f) ↔ InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ ↦ by simpa using @h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ (by simpa [imageFactorization]),
InjOn.imageFactorization_injective⟩
end injOn
section graphOn
variable {x : α × β}
lemma graphOn_univ_inj {g : α → β} : univ.graphOn f = univ.graphOn g ↔ f = g := by simp
lemma graphOn_univ_injective : Injective (univ.graphOn : (α → β) → Set (α × β)) :=
fun _f _g ↦ graphOn_univ_inj.1
lemma exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f : α → β, s = graphOn f (Prod.fst '' s)) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
rw [hf]
exact InjOn.image_of_comp <| injOn_id _
· have : ∀ x ∈ Prod.fst '' s, ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s := forall_mem_image.2 fun (x, y) h ↦ ⟨y, h⟩
choose! f hf using this
rw [forall_mem_image] at hf
use f
rw [graphOn, image_image, EqOn.image_eq_self]
exact fun x hx ↦ h (hf hx) hx rfl
lemma exists_eq_graphOn [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f t, s = graphOn f t) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s :=
.trans ⟨fun ⟨f, t, hs⟩ ↦ ⟨f, by rw [hs, image_fst_graphOn]⟩, fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨f, _, hf⟩⟩
exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst
end graphOn
/-! ### Surjectivity on a set -/
section surjOn
theorem SurjOn.subset_range (h : SurjOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
Subset.trans h <| image_subset_range f s
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype :
SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ (t' : Set β) (g : s → t'), t ⊆ t' ∧ Surjective g ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨_, (mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s _, h, surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _, fun _ => rfl⟩,
fun ⟨t', g, htt', hg, hfg⟩ y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hg ⟨y, htt' hy⟩
⟨x, x.2, by rw [hfg, hx, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩⟩
theorem surjOn_empty (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s ∅ :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem surjOn_empty_iff : SurjOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ := by
simp [SurjOn, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma surjOn_singleton : SurjOn f s {b} ↔ b ∈ f '' s := singleton_subset_iff
theorem surjOn_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s (f '' s) :=
Subset.rfl
theorem SurjOn.comap_nonempty (h : SurjOn f s t) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(ht.mono h).of_image
theorem SurjOn.congr (h : SurjOn f₁ s t) (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₂ s t := by
rwa [SurjOn, ← H.image_eq]
theorem EqOn.surjOn_iff (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₁ s t ↔ SurjOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun H => H.congr h, fun H => H.congr h.symm⟩
theorem SurjOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (hf : SurjOn f s₁ t₂) : SurjOn f s₂ t₁ :=
Subset.trans ht <| Subset.trans hf <| image_subset _ hs
theorem SurjOn.union (h₁ : SurjOn f s t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s t₂) : SurjOn f s (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => h₁ hx) fun hx => h₂ hx
theorem SurjOn.union_union (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
(h₁.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl _)).union
(h₂.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl _))
theorem SurjOn.inter_inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
intro y hy
rcases h₁ hy.1 with ⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ hy.2 with ⟨x₂, hx₂, heq⟩
obtain rfl : x₁ = x₂ := h (Or.inl hx₁) (Or.inr hx₂) heq.symm
exact mem_image_of_mem f ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem SurjOn.inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) t :=
inter_self t ▸ h₁.inter_inter h₂ h
lemma surjOn_id (s : Set α) : SurjOn id s s := by simp [SurjOn]
theorem SurjOn.comp (hg : SurjOn g t p) (hf : SurjOn f s t) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
Subset.trans hg <| Subset.trans (image_subset g hf) <| image_comp g f s ▸ Subset.refl _
lemma SurjOn.of_comp (h : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p) (hr : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn g t p := by
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := h hz
exact ⟨f x, hr hx, rfl⟩
lemma surjOn_comp_iff : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ SurjOn g (f '' s) p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_comp <| mapsTo_image f s, fun h ↦ h.comp <| surjOn_image _ _⟩
lemma SurjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : SurjOn f s s) : ∀ n, SurjOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => surjOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma SurjOn.comp_left (hf : SurjOn f s t) (g : β → γ) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) := by
rw [SurjOn, image_comp g f]; exact image_subset _ hf
lemma SurjOn.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := by
rwa [SurjOn, image_comp g f, image_preimage_eq _ hf]
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : t.Nonempty → s.Nonempty) :
SurjOn f s t :=
fun _ ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| (h ⟨_, ha⟩).image _
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s s :=
surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem surjective_iff_surjOn_univ : Surjective f ↔ SurjOn f univ univ := by
simp [Surjective, SurjOn, subset_def]
theorem SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo (h₁ : SurjOn f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset h₂.image_subset h₁
theorem image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo : f '' s = t ↔ s.SurjOn f t ∧ s.MapsTo f t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.2⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.surjOn_image f, s.mapsTo_image f⟩
lemma SurjOn.image_preimage (h : Set.SurjOn f s t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : f '' (f ⁻¹' t₁) = t₁ :=
image_preimage_eq_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ mem_range_of_mem_image f s <| h <| ht hx
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_compl (h : SurjOn f s t) (h' : Injective f) : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ :=
fun _ hs ht =>
let ⟨_, hx', HEq⟩ := h ht
hs <| h' HEq ▸ hx'
theorem MapsTo.surjOn_compl (h : MapsTo f s t) (h' : Surjective f) : SurjOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
h'.forall.2 fun _ ht => (mem_image_of_mem _) fun hs => ht (h hs)
theorem EqOn.cancel_right (hf : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f)) (hf' : s.SurjOn f t) : t.EqOn g₁ g₂ := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf' hb
exact hf ha
theorem SurjOn.cancel_right (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ t.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_right hf, fun h => h.comp_right hf'⟩
theorem eqOn_comp_right_iff : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ (f '' s).EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
(s.surjOn_image f).cancel_right <| s.mapsTo_image f
theorem SurjOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
(∀ y ∈ t, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
⟨fun H x hx ↦ H (f x) (hf' hx), fun H _y hy ↦ let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := hf hy; hxy ▸ H x hx⟩
end surjOn
/-! ### Bijectivity -/
section bijOn
theorem BijOn.mapsTo (h : BijOn f s t) : MapsTo f s t :=
h.left
theorem BijOn.injOn (h : BijOn f s t) : InjOn f s :=
h.right.left
theorem BijOn.surjOn (h : BijOn f s t) : SurjOn f s t :=
h.right.right
theorem BijOn.mk (h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : InjOn f s) (h₃ : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem bijOn_empty (f : α → β) : BijOn f ∅ ∅ :=
⟨mapsTo_empty f ∅, injOn_empty f, surjOn_empty f ∅⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_left : BijOn f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.mapsTo, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_right : BijOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.surjOn, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] lemma bijOn_singleton : BijOn f {a} {b} ↔ f a = b := by simp [BijOn, eq_comm]
theorem BijOn.inter_mapsTo (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s₂) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun _ hy =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h₁.surjOn hy.1
⟨x, ⟨hx, h₃ ⟨hx, hxy.symm.subst hy.2⟩⟩, hxy⟩⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter_bijOn (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₂ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s₁) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
inter_comm s₂ s₁ ▸ inter_comm t₂ t₁ ▸ h₂.inter_mapsTo h₁ h₃
theorem BijOn.inter (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left,
h₁.surjOn.inter_inter h₂.surjOn h⟩
theorem BijOn.union (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.union_union h₂.mapsTo, h, h₁.surjOn.union_union h₂.surjOn⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_range (h : BijOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
h.surjOn.subset_range
theorem InjOn.bijOn_image (h : InjOn f s) : BijOn f s (f '' s) :=
BijOn.mk (mapsTo_image f s) h (Subset.refl _)
theorem BijOn.congr (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₂ s t :=
BijOn.mk (h₁.mapsTo.congr h) (h₁.injOn.congr h) (h₁.surjOn.congr h)
theorem EqOn.bijOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₁ s t ↔ BijOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem BijOn.image_eq (h : BijOn f s t) : f '' s = t :=
h.surjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.mapsTo
lemma BijOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∀ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp h _ ha := h _ <| hf.mapsTo ha
mpr h b hb := by obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact h _ ha
lemma BijOn.exists {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∃ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp := by rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact ⟨a, ha, h⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨a, ha, h⟩; exact ⟨f a, hf.mapsTo ha, h⟩
lemma _root_.Equiv.image_eq_iff_bijOn (e : α ≃ β) : e '' s = t ↔ BijOn e s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨(mapsTo_image e s).mono_right h.subset, e.injective.injOn, h ▸ surjOn_image e s⟩,
BijOn.image_eq⟩
lemma bijOn_id (s : Set α) : BijOn id s s := ⟨s.mapsTo_id, s.injOn_id, s.surjOn_id⟩
theorem BijOn.comp (hg : BijOn g t p) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
BijOn.mk (hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo) (hg.injOn.comp hf.injOn hf.mapsTo) (hg.surjOn.comp hf.surjOn)
/-- If `f : α → β` and `g : β → γ` and if `f` is injective on `s`, then `f ∘ g` is a bijection
on `s` iff `g` is a bijection on `f '' s`. -/
theorem bijOn_comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ BijOn g (f '' s) p := by
simp only [BijOn, InjOn.comp_iff, surjOn_comp_iff, mapsTo_image_iff, hf]
/--
If we have a commutative square
```
α --f--> β
| |
p₁ p₂
| |
\/ \/
γ --g--> δ
```
and `f` induces a bijection from `s : Set α` to `t : Set β`, then `g`
induces a bijection from the image of `s` to the image of `t`, as long as `g` is
is injective on the image of `s`.
-/
theorem bijOn_image_image {p₁ : α → γ} {p₂ : β → δ} {g : γ → δ} (comm : ∀ a, p₂ (f a) = g (p₁ a))
(hbij : BijOn f s t) (hinj: InjOn g (p₁ '' s)) : BijOn g (p₁ '' s) (p₂ '' t) := by
obtain ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩ := hbij
refine ⟨?_, hinj, ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f a, h1 ha, by rw [comm a]⟩
· rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h3 hb
rw [← image_comp, comm]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
lemma BijOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n, BijOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => s.bijOn_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty ↔ t.Nonempty) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ h.1, injOn_of_subsingleton _ _, surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ h.2⟩
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : BijOn f s s :=
bijOn_of_subsingleton' _ Iff.rfl
theorem BijOn.bijective (h : BijOn f s t) : Bijective (h.mapsTo.restrict f s t) :=
⟨fun x y h' => Subtype.ext <| h.injOn x.2 y.2 <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h', fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h.surjOn hy
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.eq hxy⟩⟩
theorem bijective_iff_bijOn_univ : Bijective f ↔ BijOn f univ univ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨mapsTo_univ f _, inj.injOn, Iff.mp surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩)
fun h =>
let ⟨_map, inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨Iff.mpr injective_iff_injOn_univ inj, Iff.mpr surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ, _⟩ := bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
theorem BijOn.compl (hst : BijOn f s t) (hf : Bijective f) : BijOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
⟨hst.surjOn.mapsTo_compl hf.1, hf.1.injOn, hst.mapsTo.surjOn_compl hf.2⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_right {r : Set β} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrt : r ⊆ t) :
BijOn f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' r) r := by
refine ⟨inter_subset_right, hf.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn (hrt hx)
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_left {r : Set α} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
BijOn f r (f '' r) :=
(hf.injOn.mono hrs).bijOn_image
theorem BijOn.insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) (hfa : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) ↔ BijOn f s t where
mp h := by
have := congrArg (· \ {f a}) (image_insert_eq ▸ h.image_eq)
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, insert_diff_of_mem] at this
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hfa, diff_singleton_eq_self] at this
· exact ⟨by simp [← this, mapsTo'], h.injOn.mono (subset_insert ..),
by simp [← this, surjOn_image]⟩
simp only [mem_image, not_exists, not_and]
intro x hx
rw [h.injOn.eq_iff (by simp [hx]) (by simp)]
exact ha ∘ (· ▸ hx)
mpr h := by
repeat rw [insert_eq]
refine (bijOn_singleton.mpr rfl).union h ?_
simp only [singleton_union, injOn_insert fun x ↦ (hfa (h.mapsTo x)), h.injOn, mem_image,
not_exists, not_and, true_and]
exact fun _ hx h₂ ↦ hfa (h₂ ▸ h.mapsTo hx)
theorem BijOn.insert (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) :=
(insert_iff (h₂ <| h₁.mapsTo ·) h₂).mpr h₁
theorem BijOn.sdiff_singleton (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : a ∈ s) :
BijOn f (s \ {a}) (t \ {f a}) := by
convert h₁.subset_left diff_subset
simp [h₁.injOn.image_diff, h₁.image_eq, h₂, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
end bijOn
/-! ### left inverse -/
namespace LeftInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : EqOn (f' ∘ f) id s :=
h
theorem eq (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : f' (f x) = x :=
h hx
theorem congr_left (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) {t : Set β} (h₁' : MapsTo f s t)
(heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) : LeftInvOn f₂' f s := fun _ hx => heq (h₁' hx) ▸ h₁ hx
theorem congr_right (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f₁ s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : LeftInvOn f₁' f₂ s :=
fun _ hx => heq hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem injOn (h : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) : InjOn f s := fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ heq =>
calc
x₁ = f₁' (f x₁) := Eq.symm <| h h₁
_ = f₁' (f x₂) := congr_arg f₁' heq
_ = x₂ := h h₂
theorem surjOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn f' t s := fun x hx =>
⟨f x, hf hx, h hx⟩
theorem mapsTo (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
MapsTo f' t s := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hs, hx⟩ := hf hy
rwa [← hx, h hs]
lemma _root_.Set.leftInvOn_id (s : Set α) : LeftInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf' : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hg' : LeftInvOn g' g t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
LeftInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s := fun x h =>
calc
(f' ∘ g') ((g ∘ f) x) = f' (f x) := congr_arg f' (hg' (hf h))
_ = x := hf' h
theorem mono (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s) : LeftInvOn f' f s₁ := fun _ hx =>
hf (ht hx)
theorem image_inter' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' s₁ ∩ f '' s := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨by rwa [mem_preimage, hf h], mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩
· rintro _ ⟨h₁, ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨by rwa [← hf h], h⟩
theorem image_inter (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) :
f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' (s₁ ∩ s) ∩ f '' s := by
rw [hf.image_inter']
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono inter_subset_left))
rintro _ ⟨h₁, x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, by rwa [hf hx]⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
theorem image_image (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f' '' (f '' s) = s := by
rw [Set.image_image, image_congr hf, image_id']
theorem image_image' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f' '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).image_image
end LeftInvOn
/-! ### Right inverse -/
section RightInvOn
namespace RightInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : RightInvOn f' f t) : EqOn (f ∘ f') id t :=
h
theorem eq (h : RightInvOn f' f t) {y} (hy : y ∈ t) : f (f' y) = y :=
h hy
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : RightInvOn f' f (f '' s) :=
fun _y ⟨_x, hx, heq⟩ => heq ▸ (congr_arg f <| h.eq hx)
theorem congr_left (h₁ : RightInvOn f₁' f t) (heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) :
RightInvOn f₂' f t :=
h₁.congr_right heq
theorem congr_right (h₁ : RightInvOn f' f₁ t) (hg : MapsTo f' t s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) :
RightInvOn f' f₂ t :=
LeftInvOn.congr_left h₁ hg heq
theorem surjOn (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : SurjOn f s t :=
LeftInvOn.surjOn hf hf'
theorem mapsTo (h : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf : SurjOn f' t s) : MapsTo f s t :=
LeftInvOn.mapsTo h hf
lemma _root_.Set.rightInvOn_id (s : Set α) : RightInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hg : RightInvOn g' g p) (g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
RightInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) p :=
LeftInvOn.comp hg hf g'pt
theorem mono (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : RightInvOn f' f t₁ :=
LeftInvOn.mono hf ht
end RightInvOn
theorem InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn (hf : InjOn f s) (hf' : LeftInvOn f f' t)
(h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f' t s) : RightInvOn f f' s := fun _ h =>
hf (h₂ <| h₁ h) h (hf' (h₁ h))
theorem eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) (h₂ : RightInvOn f₂' f t)
(h : MapsTo f₂' t s) : EqOn f₁' f₂' t := fun y hy =>
calc
f₁' y = (f₁' ∘ f ∘ f₂') y := congr_arg f₁' (h₂ hy).symm
_ = f₂' y := h₁ (h hy)
theorem SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hf' : RightInvOn f f' s) :
LeftInvOn f f' t := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hx, heq⟩ := hf hy
rw [← heq, hf' hx]
end RightInvOn
/-! ### Two-side inverses -/
namespace InvOn
lemma _root_.Set.invOn_id (s : Set α) : InvOn id id s s := ⟨s.leftInvOn_id, s.rightInvOn_id⟩
lemma comp (hf : InvOn f' f s t) (hg : InvOn g' g t p) (fst : MapsTo f s t)
(g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
InvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s p :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 fst, hf.2.comp hg.2 g'pt⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : InvOn f' f s t) : InvOn f f' t s :=
⟨h.right, h.left⟩
theorem mono (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : InvOn f' f s₁ t₁ :=
⟨h.1.mono hs, h.2.mono ht⟩
/-- If functions `f'` and `f` are inverse on `s` and `t`, `f` maps `s` into `t`, and `f'` maps `t`
into `s`, then `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`. The `mapsTo` arguments can be deduced from
`surjOn` statements using `LeftInvOn.mapsTo` and `RightInvOn.mapsTo`. -/
theorem bijOn (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨hf, h.left.injOn, h.right.surjOn hf'⟩
end InvOn
end Set
/-! ### `invFunOn` is a left/right inverse -/
namespace Function
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange`. -/
noncomputable def invFunOn [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (b : β) : α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then Classical.choose h else Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α›
variable [Nonempty α]
theorem invFunOn_pos (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s ∧ f (invFunOn f s b) = b := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
theorem invFunOn_mem (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s :=
(invFunOn_pos h).left
theorem invFunOn_eq (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : f (invFunOn f s b) = b :=
(invFunOn_pos h).right
theorem invFunOn_neg (h : ¬∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b = Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α› := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem invFunOn_apply_mem (h : a ∈ s) : invFunOn f s (f a) ∈ s :=
invFunOn_mem ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
theorem invFunOn_apply_eq (h : a ∈ s) : f (invFunOn f s (f a)) = f a :=
invFunOn_eq ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
end Function
open Function
namespace Set
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun _a ha => h (invFunOn_apply_mem ha) ha (invFunOn_apply_eq ha)
theorem InjOn.invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s₂) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
invFunOn f s₂ '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
h.leftInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' ht
theorem _root_.Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image [Nonempty α]
(h : s ⊆ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s)) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h hx
rw [invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self [Nonempty α] :
InjOn f s ↔ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) = s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.invFunOn_image Subset.rfl, fun h ↦
(Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image h.symm.subset).injOn⟩
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_injOn_image [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Set.InjOn (invFunOn f s) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ he
rw [← invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx, he, invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_image_image_subset [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
(invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) ⊆ s := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨x,hx,rfl⟩, rfl⟩; exact invFunOn_apply_mem hx
theorem SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
RightInvOn (invFunOn f s) f t := fun _y hy => invFunOn_eq <| h hy
theorem BijOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : BijOn f s t) : InvOn (invFunOn f s) f s t :=
⟨h.injOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn, h.surjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
theorem SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
InvOn (invFunOn f s) f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine ⟨?_, h.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : MapsTo (invFunOn f s) t s :=
fun _y hy => mem_preimage.2 <| invFunOn_mem <| h hy
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image'`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image_of_subset [Nonempty α] {r : Set β} (hf : SurjOn f s t)
(hrt : r ⊆ t) : f '' (f.invFunOn s '' r) = r :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' hrt
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
f '' (f.invFunOn s '' t) = t :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image
theorem SurjOn.bijOn_subset [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine h.invOn_invFunOn.bijOn ?_ (mapsTo_image _ _)
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rwa [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset : SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' t := by
constructor
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with (rfl | ht)
· exact fun _ => ⟨∅, empty_subset _, bijOn_empty f⟩
· intro h
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨Classical.choose (h.comap_nonempty ht)⟩
exact ⟨_, h.mapsTo_invFunOn.image_subset, h.bijOn_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨s', hs', hfs'⟩
exact hfs'.surjOn.mono hs' (Subset.refl _)
alias ⟨SurjOn.exists_bijOn_subset, _⟩ := Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
variable (f s)
lemma exists_subset_bijOn : ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' (f '' s) :=
surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset.mp (surjOn_image f s)
lemma exists_image_eq_and_injOn : ∃ u, f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u :=
let ⟨u, _, hfu⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn s f
⟨u, hfu.image_eq, hfu.injOn⟩
variable {f s}
lemma exists_image_eq_injOn_of_subset_range (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
∃ s, f '' s = t ∧ InjOn f s :=
image_preimage_eq_of_subset ht ▸ exists_image_eq_and_injOn _ _
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t` and a set `t'` is contained in the image of some `s₁ ⊇ s`,
then `s₁` has a subset containing `s` that `f` maps bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend_of_subset {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (hss₁ : s ⊆ s₁) (htt' : t ⊆ t')
(ht' : SurjOn f s₁ t') : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ s₁ ∧ Set.BijOn f s' t' := by
obtain ⟨r, hrss, hbij⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn ((s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t') \ f ⁻¹' t) f
rw [image_diff_preimage, image_inter_preimage] at hbij
refine ⟨s ∪ r, subset_union_left, ?_, ?_, ?_, fun y hyt' ↦ ?_⟩
· exact union_subset hss₁ <| hrss.trans <| diff_subset.trans inter_subset_left
· rw [mapsTo', image_union, hbij.image_eq, h.image_eq, union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨htt', diff_subset.trans inter_subset_right⟩
· rw [injOn_union, and_iff_right h.injOn, and_iff_right hbij.injOn]
· refine fun x hxs y hyr hxy ↦ (hrss hyr).2 ?_
rw [← h.image_eq]
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
exact (subset_diff.1 hrss).2.symm.mono_left h.mapsTo
rw [image_union, h.image_eq, hbij.image_eq, union_diff_self]
exact .inr ⟨ht' hyt', hyt'⟩
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t`, and `t'` is a superset of `t` contained in the range of `f`,
then `f` maps some superset of `s` bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (htt' : t ⊆ t') (ht' : t' ⊆ range f) :
∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ BijOn f s' t' := by
simpa using h.exists_extend_of_subset (subset_univ s) htt' (by simpa [SurjOn])
theorem InjOn.exists_subset_injOn_subset_range_eq {r : Set α} (hinj : InjOn f r) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
∃ u : Set α, r ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hru, hus, h⟩ := hinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hrs
(image_subset f hrs) Subset.rfl
exact ⟨u, hru, hus, h.image_eq, h.injOn⟩
theorem preimage_invFun_of_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∈ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [mem_preimage, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, mem_range_self, not_true, or_false,
leftInverse_invFun hf _, hf.mem_set_image]
· simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, hx, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, not_false_iff, or_true]
theorem preimage_invFun_of_not_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∉ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· rw [mem_preimage, leftInverse_invFun hf, hf.mem_set_image]
· have : x ∉ f '' s := fun h' => hx (image_subset_range _ _ h')
simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, this]
lemma BijOn.symm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn g t s :=
⟨h.2.mapsTo hf.surjOn, h.1.injOn, h.2.surjOn hf.mapsTo⟩
lemma bijOn_comm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) : BijOn f s t ↔ BijOn g t s :=
⟨BijOn.symm h, BijOn.symm h.symm⟩
end Set
namespace Function
open Set
variable {fa : α → α} {fb : β → β} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {s t : Set α}
theorem Injective.comp_injOn (hg : Injective g) (hf : s.InjOn f) : s.InjOn (g ∘ f) :=
hg.injOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem Surjective.surjOn (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : SurjOn f univ s :=
(surjective_iff_surjOn_univ.1 hf).mono (Subset.refl _) (subset_univ _)
theorem LeftInverse.leftInvOn {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) (s : Set β) : LeftInvOn f g s :=
fun x _ => h x
theorem RightInverse.rightInvOn {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) (s : Set α) :
RightInvOn f g s := fun x _ => h x
theorem LeftInverse.rightInvOn_range {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
RightInvOn f g (range g) :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun i => congr_arg g (h i)
namespace Semiconj
theorem mapsTo_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : MapsTo fa s t) : MapsTo fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
fun _y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨fa x, ha hx, h x⟩
theorem mapsTo_image_right {t : Set β} (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
MapsTo f (fa '' s) (fb '' t) :=
mapsTo_image_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hst hx, (h x).symm⟩
theorem mapsTo_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) : MapsTo fb (range f) (range f) := fun _y ⟨x, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨fa x, h x⟩
theorem surjOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : SurjOn fa s t) : SurjOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rintro y ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rcases ha hxt with ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩
rw [h x]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxs)
theorem surjOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Surjective fa) :
SurjOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.surjOn_image (ha.surjOn univ)
theorem injOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : InjOn fa s) (hf : InjOn f (fa '' s)) :
InjOn fb (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ H
simp only [← h.eq] at H
exact congr_arg f (ha hx hy <| hf (mem_image_of_mem fa hx) (mem_image_of_mem fa hy) H)
theorem injOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Injective fa) (hf : InjOn f (range fa)) :
InjOn fb (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ] at *
exact h.injOn_image ha.injOn hf
theorem bijOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : BijOn fa s t) (hf : InjOn f t) :
BijOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo_image ha.mapsTo, h.injOn_image ha.injOn (ha.image_eq.symm ▸ hf),
h.surjOn_image ha.surjOn⟩
theorem bijOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Bijective fa) (hf : Injective f) :
BijOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.bijOn_image (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.1 ha) hf.injOn
theorem mapsTo_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s t : Set β} (hb : MapsTo fb s t) :
MapsTo fa (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := fun x hx => by simp only [mem_preimage, h x, hb hx]
theorem injOn_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s : Set β} (hb : InjOn fb s)
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : InjOn fa (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy H
have := congr_arg f H
rw [h.eq, h.eq] at this
exact hf hx hy (hb hx hy this)
end Semiconj
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : β → Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : ∀ b, γ b) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ i) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) :
(fun j => update g i a (f j)) = fun j => g (f j) :=
(update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' _ _) fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : β → γ) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' g a h
theorem insert_injOn (s : Set α) : sᶜ.InjOn fun a => insert a s := fun _a ha _ _ =>
(insert_inj ha).1
lemma apply_eq_of_range_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {b : β} (h : range f = {b}) (a : α) :
f a = b := by
simpa only [h, mem_singleton_iff] using mem_range_self (f := f) a
end Function
/-! ### Equivalences, permutations -/
namespace Set
variable {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} {g g₁ g₂ : Perm α} {s t : Set α}
protected lemma MapsTo.extendDomain (h : MapsTo g s t) :
MapsTo (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, h ha, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma SurjOn.extendDomain (h : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := h ha
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hb, rfl⟩, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma BijOn.extendDomain (h : BijOn g s t) :
BijOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo.extendDomain, (g.extendDomain f).injective.injOn, h.surjOn.extendDomain⟩
protected lemma LeftInvOn.extendDomain (h : LeftInvOn g₁ g₂ s) :
LeftInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma RightInvOn.extendDomain (h : RightInvOn g₁ g₂ t) :
RightInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma InvOn.extendDomain (h : InvOn g₁ g₂ s t) :
InvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.1.extendDomain, h.2.extendDomain⟩
end Set
namespace Set
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} {s₁ : Set α₁} {s₂ : Set α₂} {t₁ : Set β₁} {t₂ : Set β₂}
{f₁ : α₁ → β₁} {f₂ : α₂ → β₂} {g₁ : β₁ → α₁} {g₂ : β₂ → α₂}
lemma InjOn.prodMap (h₁ : s₁.InjOn f₁) (h₂ : s₂.InjOn f₂) :
(s₁ ×ˢ s₂).InjOn fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2) :=
fun x hx y hy ↦ by simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]; exact And.imp (h₁ hx.1 hy.1) (h₂ hx.2 hy.2)
lemma SurjOn.prodMap (h₁ : SurjOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨a₁, ha₁, hx₁⟩ := h₁ hx.1
obtain ⟨a₂, ha₂, hx₂⟩ := h₂ hx.2
exact ⟨(a₁, a₂), ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, Prod.ext hx₁ hx₂⟩
lemma MapsTo.prodMap (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f₂ s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
lemma BijOn.prodMap (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
BijOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.prodMap h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.prodMap h₂.injOn, h₁.surjOn.prodMap h₂.surjOn⟩
lemma LeftInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : LeftInvOn g₁ f₁ s₁) (h₂ : LeftInvOn g₂ f₂ s₂) :
LeftInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma RightInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : RightInvOn g₁ f₁ t₁) (h₂ : RightInvOn g₂ f₂ t₂) :
RightInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma InvOn.prodMap (h₁ : InvOn g₁ f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : InvOn g₂ f₂ s₂ t₂) :
InvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.1.prodMap h₂.1, h₁.2.prodMap h₂.2⟩
end Set
namespace Equiv
open Set
variable (e : α ≃ β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
lemma bijOn' (h₁ : MapsTo e s t) (h₂ : MapsTo e.symm t s) : BijOn e s t :=
⟨h₁, e.injective.injOn, fun b hb ↦ ⟨e.symm b, h₂ hb, apply_symm_apply _ _⟩⟩
protected lemma bijOn (h : ∀ a, e a ∈ t ↔ a ∈ s) : BijOn e s t :=
e.bijOn' (fun _ ↦ (h _).2) fun b hb ↦ (h _).1 <| by rwa [apply_symm_apply]
lemma invOn : InvOn e e.symm t s :=
⟨e.rightInverse_symm.leftInvOn _, e.leftInverse_symm.leftInvOn _⟩
lemma bijOn_image : BijOn e s (e '' s) := e.injective.injOn.bijOn_image
lemma bijOn_symm_image : BijOn e.symm (e '' s) s := e.bijOn_image.symm e.invOn
variable {e}
@[simp] lemma bijOn_symm : BijOn e.symm t s ↔ BijOn e s t := bijOn_comm e.symm.invOn
alias ⟨_root_.Set.BijOn.of_equiv_symm, _root_.Set.BijOn.equiv_symm⟩ := bijOn_symm
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b : α}
lemma bijOn_swap (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : BijOn (swap a b) s s :=
(swap a b).bijOn fun x ↦ by
obtain rfl | hxa := eq_or_ne x a <;>
obtain rfl | hxb := eq_or_ne x b <;>
simp [*, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 1,349 | 1,351 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Units
/-!
# Lemmas about semiconjugate elements in a `GroupWithZero`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {G₀ : Type*}
namespace SemiconjBy
@[simp]
theorem zero_right [MulZeroClass G₀] (a : G₀) : SemiconjBy a 0 0 := by
simp only [SemiconjBy, mul_zero, zero_mul]
| @[simp]
theorem zero_left [MulZeroClass G₀] (x y : G₀) : SemiconjBy 0 x y := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Semiconj.lean | 24 | 25 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Contractions
Given modules $M, N$ over a commutative ring $R$, this file defines the natural linear maps:
$M^* \otimes M \to R$, $M \otimes M^* \to R$, and $M^* \otimes N → Hom(M, N)$, as well as proving
some basic properties of these maps.
## Tags
contraction, dual module, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
variable {ι : Type*} (R M N P Q : Type*)
-- Porting note: we need high priority for this to fire first; not the case in ML3
attribute [local ext high] TensorProduct.ext
section Contraction
open TensorProduct LinearMap Matrix Module
open TensorProduct
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid Q]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
/-- The natural left-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun LinearMap.id
/-- The natural right-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractRight : M ⊗[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
/-- The natural map associating a linear map to the tensor product of two modules. -/
def dualTensorHom : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N :=
let M' := Module.Dual R M
(uncurry R M' N (M →ₗ[R] N) : _ → M' ⊗ N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N) LinearMap.smulRightₗ
variable {R M N P Q}
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractLeft R M (f ⊗ₜ m) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractRight R M (m ⊗ₜ f) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) (n : N) :
dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ n) m = f m • n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transpose_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) :
Dual.transpose (R := R) (dualTensorHom R M M (f ⊗ₜ m)) =
dualTensorHom R _ _ (Dual.eval R M m ⊗ₜ f) := by
ext f' m'
simp only [Dual.transpose_apply, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Dual.eval_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply]
exact mul_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) :
((dualTensorHom R M P) (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)).prodMap (0 : N →ₗ[R] Q) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((f ∘ₗ fst R M N) ⊗ₜ inl R P Q p) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inl, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
fst_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
(0 : M →ₗ[R] P).prodMap ((dualTensorHom R N Q) (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((g ∘ₗ snd R M N) ⊗ₜ inr R P Q q) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inr, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
snd_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
theorem map_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
TensorProduct.map (dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)) (dualTensorHom R N Q (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M ⊗[R] N) (P ⊗[R] Q) (dualDistrib R M N (f ⊗ₜ g) ⊗ₜ[R] p ⊗ₜ[R] q) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, dualTensorHom_apply, dualDistrib_apply, ←
smul_tmul_smul]
@[simp]
theorem comp_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (n : N) (g : Module.Dual R N) (p : P) :
dualTensorHom R N P (g ⊗ₜ[R] p) ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ[R] n) =
| g n • dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ p) := by
ext m
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply, LinearMap.map_smul,
RingHom.id_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply]
rw [smul_comm]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 105 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle
/-!
# Closure, interior, and frontier of preimages under `re` and `im`
In this fact we use the fact that `ℂ` is naturally homeomorphic to `ℝ × ℝ` to deduce some
topological properties of `Complex.re` and `Complex.im`.
## Main statements
Each statement about `Complex.re` listed below has a counterpart about `Complex.im`.
* `Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re`: `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial
topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`;
* `Complex.isOpenMap_re`, `Complex.isQuotientMap_re`: in particular, `Complex.re` is an open map
and is a quotient map;
* `Complex.interior_preimage_re`, `Complex.closure_preimage_re`, `Complex.frontier_preimage_re`:
formulas for `interior (Complex.re ⁻¹' s)` etc;
* `Complex.interior_setOf_re_le` etc: particular cases of the above formulas in the cases when `s`
is one of the infinite intervals `Set.Ioi a`, `Set.Ici a`, `Set.Iio a`, and `Set.Iic a`,
formulated as `interior {z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a} = {z | z.re < a}` etc.
## Tags
complex, real part, imaginary part, closure, interior, frontier
-/
open Set Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
/-- `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ re :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- `Complex.im` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ im :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.trans (Homeomorph.prodComm ℝ ℝ), fun _ => rfl⟩
theorem isOpenMap_re : IsOpenMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isOpenMap_im : IsOpenMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isQuotientMap_re : IsQuotientMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_re := isQuotientMap_re
theorem isQuotientMap_im : IsQuotientMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_im := isQuotientMap_im
theorem interior_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : interior (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem interior_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : interior (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : closure (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : closure (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_im _).symm
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | a < z.re } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | a < z.im } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | a ≤ z.re } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | a ≤ z.im } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_im (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_im (Ioi a)
theorem closure_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : closure (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_closure] using @closure_prod_eq _ _ _ _ s t
theorem interior_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : interior (s ×ℂ t) = interior s ×ℂ interior t := by
rw [reProdIm, reProdIm, interior_inter, interior_preimage_re, interior_preimage_im]
theorem frontier_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) :
frontier (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_frontier] using frontier_prod_eq s t
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_le_im (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ b ≤ im z } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ b ≤ im z } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, frontier_Ici] using frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Ici b)
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_im_le (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z ≤ b } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ im z ≤ b } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, closure_Iic, frontier_Ici, frontier_Iic] using
frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Iic b)
end Complex
open Complex Metric
| variable {s t : Set ℝ}
theorem IsOpen.reProdIm (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ℂ t) :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/ReImTopology.lean | 173 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
theorem next_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
next l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + 1) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt hi))) :=
match l, h, i, hi with
| [], _, i, hi => by simp at hi
| [_], _, _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, 0, h0 => by
have h₁ : (x :: y :: l)[0] = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, i+1, hi => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l)[i+1] ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
rw [next_getElem (y::l), ← getElem_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_getElem]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-015")] alias next_get := next_getElem
-- Unused variable linter incorrectly reports that `h` is unused here.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem prev_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
prev l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + (l.length - 1)) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega))) :=
match l with
| [] => by simp at hi
| x::l => by
induction l generalizing i x with
| nil => simp
| cons y l hl =>
rcases i with (_ | _ | i)
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [zero_add, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero,
List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, length, add_comm,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.mod_self]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl i.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hi) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l)[k] = (x :: y :: l)[k + 1]'(Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
simp
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hi
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨0, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨1, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias prev_get := prev_getElem
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intros
rw [getElem_pmap, getElem_rotate, next_getElem _ h]
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_rotate, getElem_pmap, prev_getElem _ h]
theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
theorem next_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + length tl + 1) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp [this]
theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length := by omega
rw [← getElem_pmap l.next (fun _ h => h) (by simpa using hk)]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse (l := l), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h]
rw [← getElem_pmap l.reverse.prev fun _ h => h]
· simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos'),
Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)]
rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse]
· simp [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hk)]
· simpa
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx := by
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
theorem isRotated_next_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h
rw [next_getElem _ hn]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n k]
rw [next_getElem _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n]
simp [add_assoc]
theorem isRotated_prev_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ← next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)]
exact isRotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
end List
open List
/-- `Cycle α` is the quotient of `List α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def Cycle (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsRotated.setoid α)
namespace Cycle
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The coercion from `List α` to `Cycle α` -/
@[coe] def ofList : List α → Cycle α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Cycle α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Cycle α) = (l₂ : Cycle α) ↔ l₁ ~r l₂ :=
@Quotient.eq _ (IsRotated.setoid _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quot.mk _ l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk''_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quotient.mk'' l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
theorem coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : List α) (a : α) :
(↑(a :: l) : Cycle α) = (↑(l ++ [a]) : Cycle α) :=
Quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : Cycle α :=
([] : List α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑([] : List α) = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_nil (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans isRotated_nil_iff
/-- For consistency with `EmptyCollection (List α)`. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `Cycle`. Use as `induction s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
theorem induction_on {C : Cycle α → Prop} (s : Cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ (a) (l : List α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
refine List.recOn l ?_ ?_ <;> simp only [mk''_eq_coe, coe_nil]
assumption'
/-- For `x : α`, `s : Cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def Mem (s : Cycle α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun _ _ e => propext <| e.mem_iff
instance : Membership α (Cycle α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (↑l : Cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ nil :=
List.not_mem_nil
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Cycle α) := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq''
instance [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (s : Cycle α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l => show Decidable (x ∈ l) from inferInstance
/-- Reverse a `s : Cycle α` by reversing the underlying `List`. -/
nonrec def reverse (s : Cycle α) : Cycle α :=
Quot.map reverse (fun _ _ => IsRotated.reverse) s
@[simp]
theorem reverse_coe (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : Cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
/-- The length of the `s : Cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : Cycle α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s List.length fun _ _ e => e.perm.length_eq
@[simp]
theorem length_coe (l : List α) : length (l : Cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.length_reverse
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def Subsingleton (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
theorem subsingleton_nil : Subsingleton (@nil α) := Nat.zero_le _
theorem length_subsingleton_iff {s : Cycle α} : Subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
theorem Subsingleton.congr {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_hy : y ∈ s), x = y := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero_iff, length_eq_one_iff, Nat.not_lt_zero, false_or] at h
rcases h with (rfl | ⟨z, rfl⟩) <;> simp
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def Nontrivial (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
Nontrivial (l : Cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length := by
rw [Nontrivial]
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp
· simp
· simp only [mem_cons, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, List.length, Ne, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
Nat.zero_le, iff_true]
refine ⟨hd, hd', ?_, by simp⟩
simp only [not_or, mem_cons, nodup_cons] at hl
exact hl.left.left
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [Nontrivial]
theorem length_nontrivial {s : Cycle α} (h : Nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s := by
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hx
· simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy
simp [hx, hy] at hxy
· simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
nonrec def Nodup (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s Nodup fun _l₁ _l₂ e => propext <| e.nodup_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem nodup_nil : Nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_coe_iff {l : List α} : Nodup (l : Cycle α) ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nodup ↔ s.Nodup :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => nodup_reverse
theorem Subsingleton.nodup {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) : Nodup s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := l
· simp
· have : tl = [] := by simpa [Subsingleton, length_eq_zero_iff, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h
simp [this]
theorem Nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : Cycle α} (h : Nodup s) : Nontrivial s ↔ ¬Subsingleton s := by
rw [length_subsingleton_iff]
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn'
simp only [mk''_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Multiset α`.
-/
def toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (↑) fun _ _ h => Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toMultiset = l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toMultiset : nil.toMultiset = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset.card s.toMultiset = s.length :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toMultiset = 0 ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : Cycle α → Cycle β :=
Quotient.map' (List.map f) fun _ _ h => h.map _
@[simp]
theorem map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f ↑l = List.map f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {β : Type*} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Cycle α} :
b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The `Multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : Cycle α) : Multiset (List α) :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (fun l => (l.cyclicPermutations : Multiset (List α))) fun l₁ l₂ h => by
simpa using h.cyclicPermutations.perm
@[simp]
theorem lists_coe (l : List α) : lists (l : Cycle α) = ↑l.cyclicPermutations :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_lists_iff_coe_eq {s : Cycle α} {l : List α} : l ∈ s.lists ↔ (l : Cycle α) = s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
rw [lists, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
simp
@[simp]
theorem lists_nil : lists (@nil α) = {([] : List α)} := by
rw [nil, lists_coe, cyclicPermutations_nil, Multiset.coe_singleton]
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Auxiliary decidability algorithm for lists that contain at least two unique elements.
-/
def decidableNontrivialCoe : ∀ l : List α, Decidable (Nontrivial (l : Cycle α))
| [] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| [x] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| x :: y :: l =>
if h : x = y then
@decidable_of_iff' _ (Nontrivial (x :: l : Cycle α)) (by simp [h, Nontrivial])
(decidableNontrivialCoe (x :: l))
else isTrue ⟨x, y, h, by simp, by simp⟩
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nontrivial s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s decidableNontrivialCoe
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nodup s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s List.nodupDecidable
instance fintypeNodupCycle [Fintype α] : Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup } :=
Fintype.ofSurjective (fun l : { l : List α // l.Nodup } => ⟨l.val, by simpa using l.prop⟩)
fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn' with s hs
exact ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, by simp⟩
instance fintypeNodupNontrivialCycle [Fintype α] :
Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup ∧ s.Nontrivial } :=
Fintype.subtype
(((Finset.univ : Finset { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup }).map (Function.Embedding.subtype _)).filter
Cycle.Nontrivial)
(by simp)
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Finset α`. -/
def toFinset (s : Cycle α) : Finset α :=
s.toMultiset.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : s.toMultiset.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
rfl
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 698 | 699 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell, Eric Wieser, Yaël Dillies, Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Algebraic instances for unit intervals
For suitably structured underlying type `α`, we exhibit the structure of
the unit intervals (`Set.Icc`, `Set.Ioc`, `Set.Ioc`, and `Set.Ioo`) from `0` to `1`.
Note: Instances for the interval `Ici 0` are dealt with in `Algebra/Order/Nonneg.lean`.
## Main definitions
The strongest typeclass provided on each interval is:
* `Set.Icc.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`
* `Set.Ico.commSemigroup`
* `Set.Ioc.commMonoid`
* `Set.Ioo.commSemigroup`
## TODO
* algebraic instances for intervals -1 to 1
* algebraic instances for `Ici 1`
* algebraic instances for `(Ioo (-1) 1)ᶜ`
* provide `distribNeg` instances where applicable
* prove versions of `mul_le_{left,right}` for other intervals
* prove versions of the lemmas in `Topology/UnitInterval` with `ℝ` generalized to
some arbitrary ordered semiring
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Set
variable {R : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
/-! ### Instances for `↥(Set.Icc 0 1)` -/
namespace Set.Icc
instance zero : Zero (Icc (0 : R) 1) where zero := ⟨0, left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one⟩
instance one : One (Icc (0 : R) 1) where one := ⟨1, right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : Icc (0 : R) 1) = (0 : R) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : Icc (0 : R) 1) = (1 : R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero (h : (0 : R) ∈ Icc (0 : R) 1) : (⟨0, h⟩ : Icc (0 : R) 1) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_one (h : (1 : R) ∈ Icc (0 : R) 1) : (⟨1, h⟩ : Icc (0 : R) 1) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {x : Icc (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
symm
exact Subtype.ext_iff
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : Icc (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_one {x : Icc (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
symm
exact Subtype.ext_iff
theorem coe_ne_one {x : Icc (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_one
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
theorem coe_nonneg (x : Icc (0 : R) 1) : 0 ≤ (x : R) :=
x.2.1
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
theorem coe_le_one (x : Icc (0 : R) 1) : (x : R) ≤ 1 :=
x.2.2
/-- like `coe_nonneg`, but with the inequality in `Icc (0:R) 1`. -/
theorem nonneg {t : Icc (0 : R) 1} : 0 ≤ t :=
t.2.1
/-- like `coe_le_one`, but with the inequality in `Icc (0:R) 1`. -/
theorem le_one {t : Icc (0 : R) 1} : t ≤ 1 :=
t.2.2
instance mul : Mul (Icc (0 : R) 1) where
mul p q := ⟨p * q, ⟨mul_nonneg p.2.1 q.2.1, mul_le_one₀ p.2.2 q.2.1 q.2.2⟩⟩
instance pow : Pow (Icc (0 : R) 1) ℕ where
pow p n := ⟨p.1 ^ n, ⟨pow_nonneg p.2.1 n, pow_le_one₀ p.2.1 p.2.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : Icc (0 : R) 1) : ↑(x * y) = (x * y : R) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : Icc (0 : R) 1) (n : ℕ) : ↑(x ^ n) = ((x : R) ^ n) :=
rfl
theorem mul_le_left {x y : Icc (0 : R) 1} : x * y ≤ x :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left y.2.2 x.2.1).trans_eq (mul_one _)
theorem mul_le_right {x y : Icc (0 : R) 1} : x * y ≤ y :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right x.2.2 y.2.1).trans_eq (one_mul _)
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero (Icc (0 : R) 1) := fast_instance%
Subtype.coe_injective.monoidWithZero _ coe_zero coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
instance commMonoidWithZero {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] :
CommMonoidWithZero (Icc (0 : R) 1) := fast_instance%
Subtype.coe_injective.commMonoidWithZero _ coe_zero coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
instance cancelMonoidWithZero {R : Type*} [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
[NoZeroDivisors R] :
CancelMonoidWithZero (Icc (0 : R) 1) := fast_instance%
@Function.Injective.cancelMonoidWithZero R _ NoZeroDivisors.toCancelMonoidWithZero _ _ _ _
(fun v => v.val) Subtype.coe_injective coe_zero coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
instance cancelCommMonoidWithZero {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
[NoZeroDivisors R] :
CancelCommMonoidWithZero (Icc (0 : R) 1) := fast_instance%
@Function.Injective.cancelCommMonoidWithZero R _ NoZeroDivisors.toCancelCommMonoidWithZero _ _ _ _
(fun v => v.val) Subtype.coe_injective coe_zero coe_one coe_mul coe_pow
variable {β : Type*} [Ring β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedRing β]
theorem one_sub_mem {t : β} (ht : t ∈ Icc (0 : β) 1) : 1 - t ∈ Icc (0 : β) 1 := by
rw [mem_Icc] at *
exact ⟨sub_nonneg.2 ht.2, (sub_le_self_iff _).2 ht.1⟩
theorem mem_iff_one_sub_mem {t : β} : t ∈ Icc (0 : β) 1 ↔ 1 - t ∈ Icc (0 : β) 1 :=
⟨one_sub_mem, fun h => sub_sub_cancel 1 t ▸ one_sub_mem h⟩
theorem one_sub_nonneg (x : Icc (0 : β) 1) : 0 ≤ 1 - (x : β) := by simpa using x.2.2
theorem one_sub_le_one (x : Icc (0 : β) 1) : 1 - (x : β) ≤ 1 := by simpa using x.2.1
end Set.Icc
/-! ### Instances for `↥(Set.Ico 0 1)` -/
namespace Set.Ico
instance zero [Nontrivial R] : Zero (Ico (0 : R) 1) where zero := ⟨0, left_mem_Ico.2 zero_lt_one⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero [Nontrivial R] : ↑(0 : Ico (0 : R) 1) = (0 : R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero [Nontrivial R] (h : (0 : R) ∈ Ico (0 : R) 1) : (⟨0, h⟩ : Ico (0 : R) 1) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero [Nontrivial R] {x : Ico (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
symm
exact Subtype.ext_iff
theorem coe_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {x : Ico (0 : R) 1} : (x : R) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coe_eq_zero
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
theorem coe_nonneg (x : Ico (0 : R) 1) : 0 ≤ (x : R) :=
x.2.1
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
theorem coe_lt_one (x : Ico (0 : R) 1) : (x : R) < 1 :=
x.2.2
/-- like `coe_nonneg`, but with the inequality in `Ico (0:R) 1`. -/
theorem nonneg [Nontrivial R] {t : Ico (0 : R) 1} : 0 ≤ t :=
t.2.1
instance mul : Mul (Ico (0 : R) 1) where
mul p q :=
⟨p * q, ⟨mul_nonneg p.2.1 q.2.1, mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_right p.2.2.le q.2.1 q.2.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : Ico (0 : R) 1) : ↑(x * y) = (x * y : R) :=
rfl
|
instance semigroup : Semigroup (Ico (0 : R) 1) := fast_instance%
Subtype.coe_injective.semigroup _ coe_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Set/Instances.lean | 201 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
| o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 183 | 184 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Shogo Saito. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shogo Saito. Adapted for mathlib by Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
/-!
# Chinese Remainder Theorem
This file provides definitions and theorems for the Chinese Remainder Theorem. These are used in
Gödel's Beta function, which is used in proving Gödel's incompleteness theorems.
## Main result
- `chineseRemainderOfList`: Definition of the Chinese remainder of a list
## Tags
Chinese Remainder Theorem, Gödel, beta function
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace Nat
variable {ι : Type*}
lemma modEq_list_prod_iff {a b} {l : List ℕ} (co : l.Pairwise Coprime) :
a ≡ b [MOD l.prod] ↔ ∀ i, a ≡ b [MOD l.get i] := by
induction' l with m l ih
· simp [modEq_one]
· have : Coprime m l.prod := coprime_list_prod_right_iff.mpr (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1
simp only [List.prod_cons, ← modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul this, ih (List.Pairwise.of_cons co),
List.length_cons]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0, hs⟩ i
cases i using Fin.cases <;> simp_all
· intro h; exact ⟨h 0, fun i => h i.succ⟩
|
lemma modEq_list_prod_iff' {a b} {s : ι → ℕ} {l : List ι} (co : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s)) :
a ≡ b [MOD (l.map s).prod] ↔ ∀ i ∈ l, a ≡ b [MOD s i] := by
induction' l with i l ih
· simp [modEq_one]
· have : Coprime (s i) (l.map s).prod := by
simp only [coprime_list_prod_right_iff, List.mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro j hj
exact (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1 j hj
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ChineseRemainder.lean | 41 | 50 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.Integral
/-!
# Uniqueness of the conditional kernel
We prove that the conditional kernels `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel` are almost everywhere unique.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.eq_condKernel_of_kernel_eq_compProd`: a.e. uniqueness of
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel`
* `ProbabilityTheory.eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd`: a.e. uniqueness of
`MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel_apply_eq_condKernel`: the kernel `condKernel` is almost
everywhere equal to the measure `condKernel`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Measure
variable {ρ : Measure (α × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
/-! ### Uniqueness of `Measure.condKernel`
The conditional kernel of a measure is unique almost everywhere. -/
/-- A s-finite kernel which satisfy the disintegration property of the given measure `ρ` is almost
everywhere equal to the disintegration kernel of `ρ` when evaluated on a measurable set.
This theorem in the case of finite kernels is weaker than `eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd`
which asserts that the kernels are equal almost everywhere and not just on a given measurable
set. -/
theorem eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd' (κ : Kernel α Ω) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hκ : ρ = ρ.fst ⊗ₘ κ) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, κ x s = ρ.condKernel x s := by
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setLIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite
(Kernel.measurable_coe κ hs) (Kernel.measurable_coe ρ.condKernel hs) (fun t ht _ ↦ ?_)
conv_rhs => rw [Measure.setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod ht hs, hκ]
simp only [Measure.compProd_apply (ht.prod hs), Set.mem_prod, ← lintegral_indicator ht]
congr with x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [hx]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd`.
Uniqueness of the disintegration kernel on ℝ. -/
lemma eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd_real {ρ : Measure (α × ℝ)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
(κ : Kernel α ℝ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] (hκ : ρ = ρ.fst ⊗ₘ κ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, κ x = ρ.condKernel x := by
have huniv : ∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, κ x Set.univ = ρ.condKernel x Set.univ :=
eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd' κ hκ MeasurableSet.univ
suffices ∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, ∀ ⦃t⦄, MeasurableSet t → κ x t = ρ.condKernel x t by
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
ext t ht; exact hx ht
apply MeasurableSpace.ae_induction_on_inter Real.borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic_rat
Real.isPiSystem_Iic_rat
· simp
· simp only [iUnion_singleton_eq_range, mem_range, forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff]
exact ae_all_iff.2 fun q ↦ eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd' κ hκ measurableSet_Iic
· filter_upwards [huniv] with x hxuniv t ht heq
rw [measure_compl ht <| measure_ne_top _ _, heq, hxuniv, measure_compl ht <| measure_ne_top _ _]
· refine ae_of_all _ (fun x f hdisj hf heq ↦ ?_)
rw [measure_iUnion hdisj hf, measure_iUnion hdisj hf]
exact tsum_congr heq
/-- A finite kernel which satisfies the disintegration property is almost everywhere equal to the
disintegration kernel. -/
theorem eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd (κ : Kernel α Ω) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
| (hκ : ρ = ρ.fst ⊗ₘ κ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, κ x = ρ.condKernel x := by
-- The idea is to transport the question to `ℝ` from `Ω` using `embeddingReal`
-- and then construct a measure on `α × ℝ`
let f := embeddingReal Ω
have hf := measurableEmbedding_embeddingReal Ω
set ρ' : Measure (α × ℝ) := ρ.map (Prod.map id f) with hρ'def
have hρ' : ρ'.fst = ρ.fst := by
ext s hs
rw [hρ'def, Measure.fst_apply, Measure.fst_apply, Measure.map_apply]
exacts [rfl, Measurable.prod measurable_fst <| hf.measurable.comp measurable_snd,
measurable_fst hs, hs, hs]
have hρ'' : ∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, Kernel.map κ f x = ρ'.condKernel x := by
rw [← hρ']
refine eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd_real (Kernel.map κ f) ?_
ext s hs
conv_lhs => rw [hρ'def, hκ]
rw [Measure.map_apply (measurable_id.prodMap hf.measurable) hs, hρ',
Measure.compProd_apply hs, Measure.compProd_apply (measurable_id.prodMap hf.measurable hs)]
congr with a
rw [Kernel.map_apply' _ hf.measurable]
exacts [rfl, measurable_prodMk_left hs]
suffices ∀ᵐ x ∂ρ.fst, ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → ρ'.condKernel x s = ρ.condKernel x (f ⁻¹' s) by
filter_upwards [hρ'', this] with x hx h
rw [Kernel.map_apply _ hf.measurable] at hx
ext s hs
rw [← Set.preimage_image_eq s hf.injective,
← Measure.map_apply hf.measurable <| hf.measurableSet_image.2 hs, hx,
h _ <| hf.measurableSet_image.2 hs]
suffices ρ.map (Prod.map id f) = (ρ.fst ⊗ₘ (Kernel.map ρ.condKernel f)) by
rw [← hρ'] at this
have heq := eq_condKernel_of_measure_eq_compProd_real _ this
rw [hρ'] at heq
filter_upwards [heq] with x hx s hs
rw [← hx, Kernel.map_apply _ hf.measurable, Measure.map_apply hf.measurable hs]
ext s hs
conv_lhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [Measure.compProd_apply hs, Measure.map_apply (measurable_id.prodMap hf.measurable) hs,
Measure.compProd_apply]
· congr with a
rw [Kernel.map_apply' _ hf.measurable]
exacts [rfl, measurable_prodMk_left hs]
· exact measurable_id.prodMap hf.measurable hs
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Unique.lean | 81 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
/-!
# Ordered modules as affine spaces
In this file we prove some theorems about `slope` and `lineMap` in the case when the module `E`
acting on the codomain `PE` of a function is an ordered module over its domain `k`. We also prove
inequalities that can be used to link convexity of a function on an interval to monotonicity of the
slope, see section docstring below for details.
## Implementation notes
We do not introduce the notion of ordered affine spaces (yet?). Instead, we prove various theorems
for an ordered module interpreted as an affine space.
## Tags
affine space, ordered module, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*}
/-!
### Monotonicity of `lineMap`
In this section we prove that `lineMap a b r` is monotone (strictly or not) in its arguments if
other arguments belong to specific domains.
-/
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring k] [PartialOrder k] [IsOrderedRing k]
[AddCommGroup E] [PartialOrder E] [IsOrderedAddMonoid E] [Module k E] [OrderedSMul k E]
variable {a a' b b' : E} {r r' : k}
theorem lineMap_mono_left (ha : a ≤ a') (hr : r ≤ 1) : lineMap a b r ≤ lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
exact add_le_add_right (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left ha (sub_nonneg.2 hr)) _
|
theorem lineMap_strict_mono_left (ha : a < a') (hr : r < 1) : lineMap a b r < lineMap a' b r := by
simp only [lineMap_apply_module]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Ordered.lean | 52 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.PrimePow
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Nat
/-!
# Lemmas about squarefreeness of natural numbers
A number is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares except the squares of units.
## Main Results
- `Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList`: A positive natural number `x` is squarefree iff
the list `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
theorem squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ n.primeFactorsList.Nodup := by
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors h0, Nat.factors_eq]
simp
end Nat
theorem Squarefree.nodup_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) : n.primeFactorsList.Nodup :=
(Nat.squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn.ne_zero).mp hn
namespace Nat
variable {s : Finset ℕ} {m n p : ℕ}
theorem squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ ∀ x, Prime x → ¬x * x ∣ n :=
squarefree_iff_irreducible_sq_not_dvd_of_exists_irreducible ⟨_, prime_two⟩
theorem _root_.Squarefree.natFactorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : Squarefree n) :
n.factorization p ≤ 1 := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn')
· simp
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one] at hn
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have := hn p
rw [← multiplicity_eq_factorization hp hn']
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff, hp.ne_one, or_false] at this
exact multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le this
· rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
exact zero_le_one
lemma factorization_eq_one_of_squarefree (hn : Squarefree n) (hp : p.Prime) (hpn : p ∣ n) :
factorization n p = 1 :=
(hn.natFactorization_le_one _).antisymm <| (hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero).1 hpn
theorem squarefree_of_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hn' : ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1) :
Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList hn, List.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
intro a
rw [primeFactorsList_count_eq]
apply hn'
theorem squarefree_iff_factorization_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
Squarefree n ↔ ∀ p, n.factorization p ≤ 1 :=
⟨fun hn => hn.natFactorization_le_one, squarefree_of_factorization_le_one hn⟩
theorem Squarefree.ext_iff {n m : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hm : Squarefree m) :
n = m ↔ ∀ p, Prime p → (p ∣ n ↔ p ∣ m) := by
refine ⟨by rintro rfl; simp, fun h => eq_of_factorization_eq hn.ne_zero hm.ne_zero fun p => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p.Prime
· have h₁ := h _ hp
rw [← not_iff_not, hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hn.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff,
hp.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hm.ne_zero, not_le, lt_one_iff] at h₁
have h₂ := hn.natFactorization_le_one p
have h₃ := hm.natFactorization_le_one p
omega
rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp, factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
theorem squarefree_pow_iff {n k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Squarefree (n ^ k) ↔ Squarefree n ∧ k = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by rintro ⟨hn, rfl⟩; simpa⟩
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | -)
· simp [zero_pow hk] at h
refine ⟨h.squarefree_of_dvd (dvd_pow_self _ hk), by_contradiction fun h₁ => ?_⟩
have : 2 ≤ k := k.two_le_iff.mpr ⟨hk, h₁⟩
apply hn (Nat.isUnit_iff.1 (h _ _))
rw [← sq]
exact pow_dvd_pow _ this
theorem squarefree_and_prime_pow_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ∧ IsPrimePow n ↔ Prime n := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hn => ⟨hn.squarefree, hn.isPrimePow⟩⟩
rw [isPrimePow_nat_iff]
rintro ⟨h, p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk.ne'] at h
rwa [h.2, pow_one]
/-- Assuming that `n` has no factors less than `k`, returns the smallest prime `p` such that
`p^2 ∣ n`. -/
def minSqFacAux : ℕ → ℕ → Option ℕ
| n, k =>
if h : n < k * k then none
else
have : Nat.sqrt n - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k := by
exact Nat.minFac_lemma n k h
if k ∣ n then
let n' := n / k
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt <| Nat.div_le_self _ _) k) this
if k ∣ n' then some k else minSqFacAux n' (k + 2)
else minSqFacAux n (k + 2)
termination_by n k => sqrt n + 2 - k
/-- Returns the smallest prime factor `p` of `n` such that `p^2 ∣ n`, or `none` if there is no
such `p` (that is, `n` is squarefree). See also `Nat.squarefree_iff_minSqFac`. -/
def minSqFac (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ :=
if 2 ∣ n then
let n' := n / 2
if 2 ∣ n' then some 2 else minSqFacAux n' 3
else minSqFacAux n 3
/-- The correctness property of the return value of `minSqFac`.
* If `none`, then `n` is squarefree;
* If `some d`, then `d` is a minimal square factor of `n` -/
def MinSqFacProp (n : ℕ) : Option ℕ → Prop
| none => Squarefree n
| some d => Prime d ∧ d * d ∣ n ∧ ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → d ≤ p
theorem minSqFacProp_div (n) {k} (pk : Prime k) (dk : k ∣ n) (dkk : ¬k * k ∣ n) {o}
(H : MinSqFacProp (n / k) o) : MinSqFacProp n o := by
have : ∀ p, Prime p → p * p ∣ n → k * (p * p) ∣ n := fun p pp dp =>
have :=
(coprime_primes pk pp).2 fun e => by
subst e
contradiction
(coprime_mul_iff_right.2 ⟨this, this⟩).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd dk dp
rcases o with - | d
· rw [MinSqFacProp, squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree] at H ⊢
exact fun p pp dp => H p pp ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 (this _ pp dp))
· obtain ⟨H1, H2, H3⟩ := H
simp only [dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk] at H2 H3
exact ⟨H1, dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) H2, fun p pp dp => H3 _ pp (this _ pp dp)⟩
theorem minSqFacAux_has_prop {n : ℕ} (k) (n0 : 0 < n) (i) (e : k = 2 * i + 3)
(ih : ∀ m, Prime m → m ∣ n → k ≤ m) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFacAux n k) := by
rw [minSqFacAux]
by_cases h : n < k * k <;> simp only [h, ↓reduceDIte]
· refine squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.2 fun p pp d => ?_
have := ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)
have := Nat.mul_le_mul this this
exact not_le_of_lt h (le_trans this (le_of_dvd n0 d))
have k2 : 2 ≤ k := by omega
have k0 : 0 < k := lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) k2
have IH : ∀ n', n' ∣ n → ¬k ∣ n' → MinSqFacProp n' (n'.minSqFacAux (k + 2)) := by
intro n' nd' nk
have hn' := le_of_dvd n0 nd'
refine
have : Nat.sqrt n' - k < Nat.sqrt n + 2 - k :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le_sub_right (Nat.sqrt_le_sqrt hn') _) (Nat.minFac_lemma n k h)
@minSqFacAux_has_prop n' (k + 2) (pos_of_dvd_of_pos nd' n0) (i + 1)
(by simp [e, left_distrib]) fun m m2 d => ?_
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (ih m m2 (dvd_trans d nd')) with me | ml
· subst me
contradiction
apply (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ml).resolve_left
intro me
rw [← me, e] at d
change 2 * (i + 2) ∣ n' at d
have := ih _ prime_two (dvd_trans (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd d) nd')
rw [e] at this
exact absurd this (by omega)
have pk : k ∣ n → Prime k := by
refine fun dk => prime_def_minFac.2 ⟨k2, le_antisymm (minFac_le k0) ?_⟩
exact ih _ (minFac_prime (ne_of_gt k2)) (dvd_trans (minFac_dvd _) dk)
split_ifs with dk dkk
· exact ⟨pk dk, (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).1 dkk, fun p pp d => ih p pp (dvd_trans ⟨_, rfl⟩ d)⟩
· specialize IH (n / k) (div_dvd_of_dvd dk) dkk
exact minSqFacProp_div _ (pk dk) dk (mt (Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd dk).2 dkk) IH
· exact IH n (dvd_refl _) dk
termination_by n.sqrt + 2 - k
theorem minSqFac_has_prop (n : ℕ) : MinSqFacProp n (minSqFac n) := by
dsimp only [minSqFac]; split_ifs with d2 d4
· exact ⟨prime_two, (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).1 d4, fun p pp _ => pp.two_le⟩
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d4 (by decide)
refine minSqFacProp_div _ prime_two d2 (mt (dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd d2).2 d4) ?_
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop 3 (Nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd n0 d2) (by decide)) 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with n0 | n0
· subst n0
cases d2 (by decide)
refine minSqFacAux_has_prop _ n0 0 rfl ?_
refine fun p pp dp => succ_le_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_ne pp.two_le ?_)
rintro rfl
contradiction
theorem minSqFac_prime {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : Prime d := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.1
theorem minSqFac_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) : d * d ∣ n := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
rw [h] at this
exact this.2.1
theorem minSqFac_le_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (h : n.minSqFac = some d) {m} (m2 : 2 ≤ m) (md : m * m ∣ n) :
d ≤ m := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n; rw [h] at this
have fd := minFac_dvd m
exact
le_trans (this.2.2 _ (minFac_prime <| ne_of_gt m2) (dvd_trans (mul_dvd_mul fd fd) md))
(minFac_le <| lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) m2)
theorem squarefree_iff_minSqFac {n : ℕ} : Squarefree n ↔ n.minSqFac = none := by
have := minSqFac_has_prop n
constructor <;> intro H
· rcases e : n.minSqFac with - | d
· rfl
rw [e] at this
cases squarefree_iff_prime_squarefree.1 H _ this.1 this.2.1
· rwa [H] at this
instance : DecidablePred (Squarefree : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ squarefree_iff_minSqFac
theorem squarefree_two : Squarefree 2 := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList] <;> simp
theorem divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | Squarefree d} = n.divisors :=
Finset.ext fun d => ⟨@Finset.filter_subset _ _ _ _ d, fun hd =>
Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨hd, hn.squarefree_of_dvd (Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors hd) ⟩⟩
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem divisors_filter_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | Squarefree d}.val =
(UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors n).toFinset.powerset.val.map fun x =>
x.val.prod := by
rw [(Finset.nodup _).ext ((Finset.nodup _).map_on _)]
· intro a
simp only [Multiset.mem_filter, id, Multiset.mem_map, Finset.filter_val, ← Finset.mem_def,
mem_divisors]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨an, h0⟩, hsq⟩
use (UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors a).toFinset
simp only [id, Finset.mem_powerset]
rcases an with ⟨b, rfl⟩
| rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h0
rw [UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_normalizedFactors h0.1] at hsq
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Squarefree.lean | 257 | 258 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
end AddZeroClass
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instNatSMul : SMul ℕ (α →₀ M) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (nsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
end AddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid M] : AddCommMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid
DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add (fun _ _ => rfl)
instance instNeg [NegZeroClass G] : Neg (α →₀ G) :=
⟨mapRange Neg.neg neg_zero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
theorem neg_apply [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (-g) a = -g a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_neg [NegZeroClass G] [NegZeroClass H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (v : α →₀ G) : mapRange f hf (-v) = -mapRange f hf v :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', neg_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_neg' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (-v) = -mapRange f (map_zero f) v :=
mapRange_neg (map_neg f) v
instance instSub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] : Sub (α →₀ G) :=
⟨zipWith Sub.sub (sub_zero _)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ := rfl
theorem sub_apply [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (g₁ - g₂) a = g₁ a - g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] [SubNegZeroMonoid H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ - mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', sub_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_sub' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ - mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_sub (map_sub f) v₁ v₂
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instIntSMul [AddGroup G] : SMul ℤ (α →₀ G) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (zsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup G] : AddGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup G] : AddCommGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_neg [AddGroup G] (f : α →₀ G) : support (-f) = support f :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm support_mapRange
(calc
support f = support (- -f) := congr_arg support (neg_neg _).symm
_ ⊆ support (-f) := support_mapRange
)
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq α] [AddGroup G] {f g : α →₀ G} :
support (f - g) ⊆ support f ∪ support g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← support_neg g]
exact support_add
end Finsupp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 1,317 | 1,320 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ZLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.ProdL2
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.FractionalIdeal
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Units.Basic
/-!
# Canonical embedding of a number field
The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` is the ring homomorphism
`K →+* ℂ^n` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_₁(x),...,φ_n(x))` where the `φ_i`'s are the complex
embeddings of `K`. Note that we do not choose an ordering of the embeddings, but instead map `K`
into the type `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` of `ℂ`-vectors indexed by the complex embeddings.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism `K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` defined by
sending `x : K` to the vector `(φ x)` indexed by `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding.integerLattice.inter_ball_finite`: the intersection of the
image of the ring of integers by the canonical embedding and any ball centered at `0` of finite
radius is finite.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism from `K` to the mixed space
`K →+* ({ w // IsReal w } → ℝ) × ({ w // IsComplex w } → ℂ)` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_w x)_w`
where `φ_w` is the embedding associated to the infinite place `w`. In particular, if `w` is real
then `φ_w : K →+* ℝ` and, if `w` is complex, `φ_w` is an arbitrary choice between the two complex
embeddings defining the place `w`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
/-- The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` into `ℂ^n`. -/
def _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding : K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := Pi.ringHom fun φ => φ
theorem _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K) := RingHom.injective _
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem apply_at (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K x) φ = φ x := rfl
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The image of `canonicalEmbedding` lives in the `ℝ`-submodule of the `x ∈ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` such
that `conj x_φ = x_(conj φ)` for all `∀ φ : K →+* ℂ`. -/
theorem conj_apply {x : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)} (φ : K →+* ℂ)
(hx : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K))) :
conj (x φ) = x (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) := by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => ?_) (fun a _ _ hx => ?_) hx
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [apply_at, apply_at, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq]
· rw [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply, map_zero]
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, map_add, hx, hy]
· rw [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal]
exact congrArg ((a : ℂ) * ·) hx
theorem nnnorm_eq [NumberField K] (x : K) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖₊ = Finset.univ.sup (fun φ : K →+* ℂ => ‖φ x‖₊) := by
simp_rw [Pi.nnnorm_def, apply_at]
theorem norm_le_iff [NumberField K] (x : K) (r : ℝ) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
obtain hr | hr := lt_or_le r 0
· obtain ⟨φ⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (K →+* ℂ))
refine iff_of_false ?_ ?_
· exact (hr.trans_le (norm_nonneg _)).not_le
· exact fun h => hr.not_le (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h φ))
· lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left]
variable (K)
/-- The image of `𝓞 K` as a subring of `ℂ^n`. -/
def integerLattice : Subring ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) :=
(RingHom.range (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).map (canonicalEmbedding K)
theorem integerLattice.inter_ball_finite [NumberField K] (r : ℝ) :
((integerLattice K : Set ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)) ∩ Metric.closedBall 0 r).Finite := by
obtain hr | _ := lt_or_le r 0
· simp [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty.2 hr]
· have heq : ∀ x, canonicalEmbedding K x ∈ Metric.closedBall 0 r ↔
∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
intro x; rw [← norm_le_iff, mem_closedBall_zero_iff]
convert (Embeddings.finite_of_norm_le K ℂ r).image (canonicalEmbedding K)
ext; constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨SetLike.coe_mem x, fun φ => (heq _).mp hx φ⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx1, hx2⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟨x, hx1⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, (heq x).mpr hx2⟩
open Module Fintype Module
/-- A `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` that is also a `ℤ`-basis of the `integerLattice`. -/
noncomputable def latticeBasis [NumberField K] :
Basis (Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ℂ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := by
classical
-- Let `B` be the canonical basis of `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ`. We prove that the determinant of
-- the image by `canonicalEmbedding` of the integral basis of `K` is nonzero. This
-- will imply the result.
let B := Pi.basisFun ℂ (K →+* ℂ)
let e : (K →+* ℂ) ≃ Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
equivOfCardEq ((Embeddings.card K ℂ).trans (finrank_eq_card_basis (integralBasis K)))
let M := B.toMatrix (fun i => canonicalEmbedding K (integralBasis K (e i)))
suffices M.det ≠ 0 by
rw [← isUnit_iff_ne_zero, ← Basis.det_apply, ← is_basis_iff_det] at this
exact (basisOfPiSpaceOfLinearIndependent this.1).reindex e
-- In order to prove that the determinant is nonzero, we show that it is equal to the
-- square of the discriminant of the integral basis and thus it is not zero
let N := Algebra.embeddingsMatrixReindex ℚ ℂ (fun i => integralBasis K (e i))
RingHom.equivRatAlgHom
rw [show M = N.transpose by { ext : 2; rfl }]
rw [Matrix.det_transpose, ← pow_ne_zero_iff two_ne_zero]
convert (map_ne_zero_iff _ (algebraMap ℚ ℂ).injective).mpr
(Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K))
rw [← Algebra.discr_reindex ℚ (integralBasis K) e.symm]
exact (Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two ℚ ℂ
(fun i => integralBasis K (e i)) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom).symm
@[simp]
theorem latticeBasis_apply [NumberField K] (i : Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
latticeBasis K i = (canonicalEmbedding K) (integralBasis K i) := by
simp [latticeBasis, integralBasis_apply, coe_basisOfPiSpaceOfLinearIndependent,
Function.comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem mem_span_latticeBasis [NumberField K] {x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ} :
x ∈ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) ↔
x ∈ ((canonicalEmbedding K).comp (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).range := by
rw [show Set.range (latticeBasis K) =
(canonicalEmbedding K).toIntAlgHom.toLinearMap '' (Set.range (integralBasis K)) by
rw [← Set.range_comp]; exact congrArg Set.range (funext (fun i => latticeBasis_apply K i))]
rw [← Submodule.map_span, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← RingHom.map_range, Subring.mem_map, Set.mem_image]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_span_integralBasis K]
rfl
theorem mem_rat_span_latticeBasis [NumberField K] (x : K) :
canonicalEmbedding K x ∈ Submodule.span ℚ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) := by
rw [← Basis.sum_repr (integralBasis K) x, map_sum]
simp_rw [map_rat_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_smul_mem _ _ (fun i _ ↦ Submodule.subset_span ?_)
rw [← latticeBasis_apply]
exact Set.mem_range_self i
theorem integralBasis_repr_apply [NumberField K] (x : K) (i : Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
(latticeBasis K).repr (canonicalEmbedding K x) i = (integralBasis K).repr x i := by
rw [← Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply ℚ _ ⟨_, mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x⟩, eq_ratCast,
Rat.cast_inj]
let f := (canonicalEmbedding K).toRatAlgHom.toLinearMap.codRestrict _
(fun x ↦ mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x)
suffices ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ).repr.toLinearMap ∘ₗ f =
(integralBasis K).repr.toLinearMap from DFunLike.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun this x) i
refine Basis.ext (integralBasis K) (fun i ↦ ?_)
have : f (integralBasis K i) = ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ) i := by
apply Subtype.val_injective
rw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, Basis.restrictScalars_apply,
latticeBasis_apply]
rfl
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, this, Basis.repr_self]
end NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField.InfinitePlace Module Finset
/-- The mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` with `(r₁, r₂)` the signature of `K`. -/
abbrev mixedSpace :=
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
/-- The mixed embedding of a number field `K` into the mixed space of `K`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding : K →+* (mixedSpace K) :=
RingHom.prod (Pi.ringHom fun w => embedding_of_isReal w.prop)
(Pi.ringHom fun w => w.val.embedding)
@[simp]
theorem mixedEmbedding_apply_isReal (x : K) (w : {w // IsReal w}) :
(mixedEmbedding K x).1 w = embedding_of_isReal w.prop x := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mixedEmbedding_apply_isComplex (x : K) (w : {w // IsComplex w}) :
(mixedEmbedding K x).2 w = w.val.embedding x := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias mixedEmbedding_apply_ofIsReal :=
mixedEmbedding_apply_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias mixedEmbedding_apply_ofIsComplex :=
mixedEmbedding_apply_isComplex
instance [NumberField K] : Nontrivial (mixedSpace K) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
obtain hw | hw := w.isReal_or_isComplex
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_left
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_right
protected theorem finrank [NumberField K] : finrank ℝ (mixedSpace K) = finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [finrank_prod, finrank_pi, finrank_pi_fintype, Complex.finrank_real_complex, sum_const,
card_univ, ← nrRealPlaces, ← nrComplexPlaces, ← card_real_embeddings, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm, ← card_complex_embeddings, ← NumberField.Embeddings.card K ℂ,
Fintype.card_subtype_compl, Nat.add_sub_of_le (Fintype.card_subtype_le _)]
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.mixedEmbedding K) := by
exact RingHom.injective _
section Measure
open MeasureTheory.Measure MeasureTheory
variable [NumberField K]
open Classical in
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (mixedSpace K)) :=
prod.instIsAddHaarMeasure volume volume
open Classical in
instance : NoAtoms (volume : Measure (mixedSpace K)) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
by_cases hw : IsReal w
· have : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ)) := pi_noAtoms ⟨w, hw⟩
exact prod.instNoAtoms_fst
· have : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)) :=
pi_noAtoms ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩
exact prod.instNoAtoms_snd
variable {K} in
open Classical in
/-- The set of points in the mixedSpace that are equal to `0` at a fixed (real) place has
volume zero. -/
theorem volume_eq_zero (w : {w // IsReal w}) :
volume ({x : mixedSpace K | x.1 w = 0}) = 0 := by
let A : AffineSubspace ℝ (mixedSpace K) :=
Submodule.toAffineSubspace (Submodule.mk ⟨⟨{x | x.1 w = 0}, by aesop⟩, rfl⟩ (by aesop))
convert Measure.addHaar_affineSubspace volume A fun h ↦ ?_
simpa [A] using (h ▸ Set.mem_univ _ : 1 ∈ A)
end Measure
section commMap
/-- The linear map that makes `canonicalEmbedding` and `mixedEmbedding` commute, see
`commMap_canonical_eq_mixed`. -/
noncomputable def commMap : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) →ₗ[ℝ] (mixedSpace K) where
toFun := fun x => ⟨fun w => (x w.val.embedding).re, fun w => x w.val.embedding⟩
map_add' := by
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Complex.add_re, Prod.mk_add_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
map_smul' := by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, Complex.mul_re, Complex.ofReal_re,
Complex.ofReal_im, zero_mul, sub_zero, RingHom.id_apply, Prod.smul_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem commMap_apply_of_isReal (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) :
(commMap K x).1 ⟨w, hw⟩ = (x w.embedding).re := rfl
theorem commMap_apply_of_isComplex (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) :
(commMap K x).2 ⟨w, hw⟩ = x w.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem commMap_canonical_eq_mixed (x : K) :
commMap K (canonicalEmbedding K x) = mixedEmbedding K x := by
simp only [canonicalEmbedding, commMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, Pi.ringHom_apply,
mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
/-- This is a technical result to ensure that the image of the `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` defined in
`canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis` is a `ℝ`-basis of the mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`,
see `mixedEmbedding.latticeBasis`. -/
theorem disjoint_span_commMap_ker [NumberField K] :
Disjoint (Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K)))
(LinearMap.ker (commMap K)) := by
refine LinearMap.disjoint_ker.mpr (fun x h_mem h_zero => ?_)
replace h_mem : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K)) := by
refine (Submodule.span_mono ?_) h_mem
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨integralBasis K i, (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis_apply K i).symm⟩
ext1 φ
rw [Pi.zero_apply]
by_cases hφ : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ
· apply Complex.ext
· rw [← embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ, ← commMap_apply_of_isReal K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
exact congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.1) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, _⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_im, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im, canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem,
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp hφ]
· have := congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.2) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩⟩
cases embedding_mk_eq φ with
| inl h => rwa [← h, ← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
| inr h =>
apply RingHom.injective (starRingEnd ℂ)
rwa [canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem, ← h, map_zero,
← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
end commMap
noncomputable section norm
variable {K}
open scoped Classical in
/-- The norm at the infinite place `w` of an element of the mixed space -/
def normAtPlace (w : InfinitePlace K) : (mixedSpace K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := if hw : IsReal w then ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ else ‖x.2 ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩‖
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_nonneg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) :
0 ≤ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_nonneg _
theorem normAtPlace_neg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w (- x) = normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_add_le (w : InfinitePlace K) (x y : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w (x + y) ≤ normAtPlace w x + normAtPlace w y := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_add_le _ _
theorem normAtPlace_smul (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w (c • x) = |c| * normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_real (w : InfinitePlace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = |c| := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, normAtPlace_smul,
map_one, mul_one]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, dif_pos]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.2 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
dif_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias normAtPlace_apply_isReal := normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias normAtPlace_apply_isComplex :=
normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex
@[simp]
theorem normAtPlace_apply (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
normAtPlace w (mixedEmbedding K x) = w x := by
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, mixedEmbedding,
RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply, norm_embedding_of_isReal, norm_embedding_eq, dite_eq_ite,
ite_id]
theorem forall_normAtPlace_eq_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
(∀ w, normAtPlace w x = 0) ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· ext w
· exact norm_eq_zero.mp (normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· exact norm_eq_zero.mp (normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· simp_rw [h, map_zero, implies_true]
| @[simp]
theorem exists_normAtPlace_ne_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
(∃ w, normAtPlace w x ≠ 0) ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, ← forall_normAtPlace_eq_zero_iff, not_forall]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/Basic.lean | 377 | 380 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| · intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 353 | 355 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Denumerable
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Relation embeddings from the naturals
This file allows translation from monotone functions `ℕ → α` to order embeddings `ℕ ↪ α` and
defines the limit value of an eventually-constant sequence.
## Main declarations
* `natLT`/`natGT`: Make an order embedding `Nat ↪ α` from
an increasing/decreasing function `Nat → α`.
* `monotonicSequenceLimit`: The limit of an eventually-constant monotone sequence `Nat →o α`.
* `monotonicSequenceLimitIndex`: The index of the first occurrence of `monotonicSequenceLimit`
in the sequence.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace RelEmbedding
variable {r : α → α → Prop} [IsStrictOrder α r]
/-- If `f` is a strictly `r`-increasing sequence, then this returns `f` as an order embedding. -/
def natLT (f : ℕ → α) (H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f n) (f (n + 1))) : ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r :=
ofMonotone f <| Nat.rel_of_forall_rel_succ_of_lt r H
@[simp]
theorem coe_natLT {f : ℕ → α} {H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f n) (f (n + 1))} : ⇑(natLT f H) = f :=
rfl
/-- If `f` is a strictly `r`-decreasing sequence, then this returns `f` as an order embedding. -/
def natGT (f : ℕ → α) (H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f (n + 1)) (f n)) : ((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r :=
haveI := IsStrictOrder.swap r
RelEmbedding.swap (natLT f H)
@[simp]
theorem coe_natGT {f : ℕ → α} {H : ∀ n : ℕ, r (f (n + 1)) (f n)} : ⇑(natGT f H) = f :=
rfl
theorem exists_not_acc_lt_of_not_acc {a : α} {r} (h : ¬Acc r a) : ∃ b, ¬Acc r b ∧ r b a := by
contrapose! h
refine ⟨_, fun b hr => ?_⟩
by_contra hb
exact h b hb hr
/-- A value is accessible iff it isn't contained in any infinite decreasing sequence. -/
theorem acc_iff_no_decreasing_seq {x} :
Acc r x ↔ IsEmpty { f : ((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r // x ∈ Set.range f } := by
constructor
· refine fun h => h.recOn fun x _ IH => ?_
constructor
rintro ⟨f, k, hf⟩
exact IsEmpty.elim' (IH (f (k + 1)) (hf ▸ f.map_rel_iff.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _))) ⟨f, _, rfl⟩
· have : ∀ x : { a // ¬Acc r a }, ∃ y : { a // ¬Acc r a }, r y.1 x.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
cases exists_not_acc_lt_of_not_acc hx with
| intro w h => exact ⟨⟨w, h.1⟩, h.2⟩
choose f h using this
refine fun E =>
by_contradiction fun hx => E.elim' ⟨natGT (fun n => (f^[n] ⟨x, hx⟩).1) fun n => ?_, 0, rfl⟩
simp only [Function.iterate_succ']
apply h
theorem not_acc_of_decreasing_seq (f : ((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r) (k : ℕ) : ¬Acc r (f k) := by
rw [acc_iff_no_decreasing_seq, not_isEmpty_iff]
exact ⟨⟨f, k, rfl⟩⟩
/-- A strict order relation is well-founded iff it doesn't have any infinite decreasing sequence.
See `wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq` for a version which works on any relation. -/
theorem wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq :
WellFounded r ↔ IsEmpty (((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h⟩
exact ⟨fun f => not_acc_of_decreasing_seq f 0 (h _)⟩
· intro h
exact ⟨fun x => acc_iff_no_decreasing_seq.2 inferInstance⟩
theorem not_wellFounded_of_decreasing_seq (f : ((· > ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) ↪r r) : ¬WellFounded r := by
rw [wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq, not_isEmpty_iff]
exact ⟨f⟩
end RelEmbedding
theorem not_strictAnti_of_wellFoundedLT [Preorder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (f : ℕ → α) :
¬ StrictAnti f := fun hf ↦
| (RelEmbedding.natGT f (fun n ↦ hf (by simp))).not_wellFounded_of_decreasing_seq wellFounded_lt
theorem not_strictMono_of_wellFoundedGT [Preorder α] [WellFoundedGT α] (f : ℕ → α) :
| Mathlib/Order/OrderIsoNat.lean | 99 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# Theory of topological modules
We use the class `ContinuousSMul` for topological (semi) modules and topological vector spaces.
-/
assert_not_exists Star.star
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology Filter Pointwise
universe u v w u'
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem ContinuousSMul.of_nhds_zero [IsTopologicalRing R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
(hmul : Tendsto (fun p : R × M => p.1 • p.2) (𝓝 0 ×ˢ 𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulleft : ∀ m : M, Tendsto (fun a : R => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0))
(hmulright : ∀ a : R, Tendsto (fun m : M => a • m) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)) : ContinuousSMul R M where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← nhds_prod_eq] at hmul
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂ (AddMonoidHom.smul : R →+ M →+ M) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simpa [ContinuousAt]
variable (R M) in
omit [TopologicalSpace R] in
/-- A topological module over a ring has continuous negation.
This cannot be an instance, because it would cause search for `[Module ?R M]` with unknown `R`. -/
theorem ContinuousNeg.of_continuousConstSMul [ContinuousConstSMul R M] : ContinuousNeg M where
continuous_neg := by simpa using continuous_const_smul (T := M) (-1 : R)
end
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Ring R] [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace M]
[AddCommGroup M] [ContinuousAdd M] [Module R M] [ContinuousSMul R M]
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior.
This is the case, e.g., if `R` is a nontrivially normed field. -/
theorem Submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [NeBot (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0)]
(s : Submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s : Set M)).Nonempty) : s = ⊤ := by
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine Submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => ?_
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy
have : Tendsto (fun c : R => y + c • x) (𝓝[{ x : R | IsUnit x }] 0) (𝓝 (y + (0 : R) • x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul tendsto_const_nhds)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this
obtain ⟨_, hu : y + _ • _ ∈ s, u, rfl⟩ :=
nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem (Filter.mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhdsWithin)
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_mem_nhds hy
rwa [s.add_mem_iff_right hy', ← Units.smul_def, s.smul_mem_iff' u] at hu
variable (R M)
/-- Let `R` be a topological ring such that zero is not an isolated point (e.g., a nontrivially
normed field, see `NormedField.punctured_nhds_neBot`). Let `M` be a nontrivial module over `R`
such that `c • x = 0` implies `c = 0 ∨ x = 0`. Then `M` has no isolated points. We formulate this
using `NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)`.
This lemma is not an instance because Lean would need to find `[ContinuousSMul ?m_1 M]` with
unknown `?m_1`. We register this as an instance for `R = ℝ` in `Real.punctured_nhds_module_neBot`.
One can also use `haveI := Module.punctured_nhds_neBot R M` in a proof.
-/
theorem Module.punctured_nhds_neBot [Nontrivial M] [NeBot (𝓝[≠] (0 : R))] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(x : M) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨y, hy⟩
suffices Tendsto (fun c : R => x + c • y) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝[≠] x) from this.neBot
refine Tendsto.inf ?_ (tendsto_principal_principal.2 <| ?_)
· convert tendsto_const_nhds.add ((@tendsto_id R _).smul_const y)
rw [zero_smul, add_zero]
· intro c hc
simpa [hy] using hc
end
section LatticeOps
variable {R M₁ M₂ : Type*} [SMul R M₁] [SMul R M₂] [u : TopologicalSpace R]
{t : TopologicalSpace M₂} [ContinuousSMul R M₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M₁ M₂] [MulActionHomClass F R M₁ M₂] (f : F)
theorem continuousSMul_induced : @ContinuousSMul R M₁ _ u (t.induced f) :=
let _ : TopologicalSpace M₁ := t.induced f
IsInducing.continuousSMul ⟨rfl⟩ continuous_id (map_smul f _ _)
end LatticeOps
/-- The span of a separable subset with respect to a separable scalar ring is again separable. -/
lemma TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.span {R M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalSpace R] [SeparableSpace R]
[ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousSMul R M] {s : Set M} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
IsSeparable (Submodule.span R s : Set M) := by
rw [Submodule.span_eq_iUnion_nat]
refine .iUnion fun n ↦ .image ?_ ?_
· have : IsSeparable {f : Fin n → R × M | ∀ (i : Fin n), f i ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ s} := by
apply isSeparable_pi (fun i ↦ .prod (.of_separableSpace Set.univ) hs)
rwa [Set.univ_prod] at this
· apply continuous_finset_sum _ (fun i _ ↦ ?_)
exact (continuous_fst.comp (continuous_apply i)).smul (continuous_snd.comp (continuous_apply i))
namespace Submodule
instance topologicalAddGroup {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[TopologicalSpace M] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] (S : Submodule R M) : IsTopologicalAddGroup S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsTopologicalAddGroup S.toAddSubgroup)
end Submodule
section closure
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace M] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[ContinuousConstSMul R M]
theorem Submodule.mapsTo_smul_closure (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (closure s : Set M) (closure s) :=
have : Set.MapsTo (c • ·) (s : Set M) s := fun _ h ↦ s.smul_mem c h
this.closure (continuous_const_smul c)
theorem Submodule.smul_closure_subset (s : Submodule R M) (c : R) :
c • closure (s : Set M) ⊆ closure (s : Set M) :=
(s.mapsTo_smul_closure c).image_subset
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a submodule of a topological `R`-module `M` is itself
a submodule. -/
def Submodule.topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : Submodule R M :=
{ s.toAddSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
smul_mem' := s.mapsTo_smul_closure }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe (s : Submodule R M) :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set M) = closure (s : Set M) :=
rfl
theorem Submodule.le_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
subset_closure
theorem Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span (s : Set M) :
closure s ⊆ (span R s).topologicalClosure := by
rw [Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
exact closure_mono subset_span
theorem Submodule.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Submodule R M) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set M) := isClosed_closure
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Submodule R M) {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set M)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
theorem Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono {s : Submodule R M} {t : Submodule R M} (h : s ≤ t) :
s.topologicalClosure ≤ t.topologicalClosure :=
closure_mono h
/-- The topological closure of a closed submodule `s` is equal to `s`. -/
theorem IsClosed.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq {s : Submodule R M} (hs : IsClosed (s : Set M)) :
s.topologicalClosure = s :=
SetLike.ext' hs.closure_eq
/-- A subspace is dense iff its topological closure is the entire space. -/
theorem Submodule.dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top {s : Submodule R M} :
Dense (s : Set M) ↔ s.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq, dense_iff_closure_eq]
simp
instance Submodule.topologicalClosure.completeSpace {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
[UniformSpace M'] [ContinuousAdd M'] [ContinuousConstSMul R M'] [CompleteSpace M']
(U : Submodule R M') : CompleteSpace U.topologicalClosure :=
isClosed_closure.completeSpace_coe
/-- A maximal proper subspace of a topological module (i.e a `Submodule` satisfying `IsCoatom`)
is either closed or dense. -/
theorem Submodule.isClosed_or_dense_of_isCoatom (s : Submodule R M) (hs : IsCoatom s) :
IsClosed (s : Set M) ∨ Dense (s : Set M) := by
refine (hs.le_iff.mp s.le_topologicalClosure).symm.imp ?_ dense_iff_topologicalClosure_eq_top.mpr
exact fun h ↦ h ▸ isClosed_closure
end closure
namespace Submodule
variable {ι R : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [DecidableEq ι]
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well. -/
theorem closure_coe_iSup_map_single (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
closure (↑(⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) : Set (∀ i, M i)) =
Set.univ.pi fun i ↦ closure (s i) := by
rw [← closure_pi_set]
refine (closure_mono ?_).antisymm <| closure_minimal ?_ isClosed_closure
· exact SetLike.coe_mono <| iSup_map_single_le
· simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_closure_iff]
intro x hx U hU hxU
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.mp hU x hxU with ⟨t, V, hV, hVU⟩
refine ⟨∑ i ∈ t, Pi.single i (x i), hVU ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_all [Finset.sum_pi_single]
· exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| mem_map_of_mem <| hx _ <| Set.mem_univ _
/-- If `s i` is a family of submodules, each is in its module,
then the closure of their span in the indexed product of the modules
is the product of their closures.
In case of a finite index type, this statement immediately follows from `Submodule.iSup_map_single`.
However, the statement is true for an infinite index type as well.
This version is stated in terms of `Submodule.topologicalClosure`,
thus assumes that `M i`s are topological modules over `R`.
However, the statement is true without assuming continuity of the operations,
see `Submodule.closure_coe_iSup_map_single` above. -/
theorem topologicalClosure_iSup_map_single [∀ i, ContinuousAdd (M i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousConstSMul R (M i)] (s : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)) :
topologicalClosure (⨆ i, (s i).map (LinearMap.single R M i)) =
pi Set.univ fun i ↦ (s i).topologicalClosure :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| closure_coe_iSup_map_single _
end Submodule
section Pi
theorem LinearMap.continuous_on_pi {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Finite ι] [Semiring R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousAdd M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] (f : (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) : Continuous f := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
-- for the proof, write `f` in the standard basis, and use that each coordinate is a continuous
-- function.
have : (f : (ι → R) → M) = fun x => ∑ i : ι, x i • f fun j => if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
ext x
exact f.pi_apply_eq_sum_univ x
rw [this]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
exact (continuous_apply i).smul continuous_const
end Pi
section PointwiseLimits
variable {M₁ M₂ α R S : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M₂] [T2Space M₂] [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module S M₂] [ContinuousConstSMul S M₂]
variable [ContinuousAdd M₂] {σ : R →+* S} {l : Filter α}
/-- Constructs a bundled linear map from a function and a proof that this function belongs to the
closure of the set of linear maps. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe (f : M₁ → M₂)
(hf : f ∈ closure (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂))) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
{ addMonoidHomOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf with
map_smul' := (isClosed_setOf_map_smul M₁ M₂ σ).closure_subset_iff.2
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ) hf }
/-- Construct a bundled linear map from a pointwise limit of linear maps -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def linearMapOfTendsto (f : M₁ → M₂) (g : α → M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) [l.NeBot]
(h : Tendsto (fun a x => g a x) l (𝓝 f)) : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂ :=
linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f <|
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => Set.mem_range_self _
variable (M₁ M₂ σ)
theorem LinearMap.isClosed_range_coe : IsClosed (Set.range ((↑) : (M₁ →ₛₗ[σ] M₂) → M₁ → M₂)) :=
isClosed_of_closure_subset fun f hf => ⟨linearMapOfMemClosureRangeCoe f hf, rfl⟩
end PointwiseLimits
section Quotient
namespace Submodule
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [TopologicalSpace M]
(S : Submodule R M)
instance _root_.QuotientModule.Quotient.topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.quotientRel))
theorem isOpenMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenMap_coe
theorem isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ [ContinuousAdd M] : IsOpenQuotientMap S.mkQ :=
QuotientAddGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk
instance topologicalAddGroup_quotient [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] : IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsTopologicalAddGroup (M ⧸ S.toAddSubgroup)
instance continuousSMul_quotient [TopologicalSpace R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup M]
[ContinuousSMul R M] : ContinuousSMul R (M ⧸ S) where
continuous_smul := by
rw [← (IsOpenQuotientMap.id.prodMap S.isOpenQuotientMap_mkQ).continuous_comp_iff]
exact continuous_quot_mk.comp continuous_smul
instance t3_quotient_of_isClosed [IsTopologicalAddGroup M] [IsClosed (S : Set M)] :
T3Space (M ⧸ S) :=
letI : IsClosed (S.toAddSubgroup : Set M) := ‹_›
QuotientAddGroup.instT3Space S.toAddSubgroup
end Submodule
end Quotient
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Basic.lean | 1,615 | 1,618 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Connectivity of subgraphs and induced graphs
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Preconnected` and `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected` give subgraphs
connectivity predicates via `SimpleGraph.subgraph.coe`.
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
/-- A subgraph is preconnected if it is preconnected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
/-- A subgraph is connected if it is connected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
| protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 54 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
/-!
# Perpendicular bisector of a segment
We define `AffineSubspace.perpBisector p₁ p₂` to be the perpendicular bisector of the segment
`[p₁, p₂]`, as a bundled affine subspace. We also prove that a point belongs to the perpendicular
bisector if and only if it is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, as well as a few linear equations that
define this subspace.
## Keywords
euclidean geometry, perpendicular, perpendicular bisector, line segment bisector, equidistant
-/
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- Perpendicular bisector of a segment in a Euclidean affine space. -/
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) (LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)))
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `p₂ -ᵥ p₁` is orthogonal to
`c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂` is
orthogonal to `p₂ -ᵥ p₁`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem midpoint_mem_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ := by
simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero]
theorem perpBisector_nonempty : (perpBisector p₁ p₂ : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨_, midpoint_mem_perpBisector _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem direction_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
(perpBisector p₁ p₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))ᗮ := by
rw [perpBisector, direction_mk']
ext x
exact Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [Iff.comm, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← add_neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ← inner_add_left, vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add,
real_inner_smul_left]; simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = (dist p₁ p₂) ^ 2 / 2 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right _ _ p₁, inner_sub_left,
sub_eq_zero, midpoint_vsub_left, invOf_eq_inv, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist c p₁ = dist c p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left, inner_add_left, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq' : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist p₁ c = dist p₂ c := by
simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, dist_comm]
theorem perpBisector_comm (p₁ p₂ : P) : perpBisector p₁ p₂ = perpBisector p₂ p₁ := by
| ext c; simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 97 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
| rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 165 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Filter
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Measure
import Mathlib.Analysis.Oscillation
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
/-!
# Integrals of Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane
In this file we define the integral of a function over a box in `ℝⁿ`. The same definition works for
Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of functions `ι → ℝ` for some finite type `ι`. A rectangular
box `(l, u]` in `ℝⁿ` is defined to be the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}`, see
`BoxIntegral.Box`.
Let `vol` be a box-additive function on boxes in `ℝⁿ` with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F`. Given a function
`f : ℝⁿ → E`, a box `I` and a tagged partition `π` of this box, the *integral sum* of `f` over `π`
with respect to the volume `vol` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. Here
`π.tag J` is the point (tag) in `ℝⁿ` associated with the box `J`.
The integral is defined as the limit of integral sums along a filter. Different filters correspond
to different integration theories. In order to avoid code duplication, all our definitions and
theorems take an argument `l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. This is a type that holds three
boolean values, and encodes eight filters including those corresponding to Riemann,
Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
Following the design of infinite sums (see `hasSum` and `tsum`), we define a predicate
`BoxIntegral.HasIntegral` and a function `BoxIntegral.integral` that returns a vector satisfying
the predicate or zero if the function is not integrable.
Then we prove some basic properties of box integrals (linearity, a formula for the integral of a
constant). We also prove a version of the Henstock-Sacks inequality (see
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet` and
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq`), prove
integrability of continuous functions, and provide a criterion for integrability w.r.t. a
non-Riemann filter (e.g., Henstock-Kurzweil and McShane).
## Notation
- `ℝⁿ`: local notation for `ι → ℝ`
## Tags
integral
-/
open scoped Topology NNReal Filter Uniformity BoxIntegral
open Set Finset Function Filter Metric BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type u} {E : Type v} {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {I J : Box ι} {π : TaggedPrepartition I}
open TaggedPrepartition
local notation "ℝⁿ" => ι → ℝ
/-!
### Integral sum and its basic properties
-/
/-- The integral sum of `f : ℝⁿ → E` over a tagged prepartition `π` w.r.t. box-additive volume `vol`
with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. -/
def integralSum (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) : F :=
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, vol J (f (π.tag J))
theorem integralSum_biUnionTagged (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, TaggedPrepartition J) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionTagged πi) = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J) := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans <| sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => ?_
rw [π.tag_biUnionTagged hJ hJ']
theorem integralSum_biUnion_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (hπi : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionPrepartition πi) = integralSum f vol π := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_)
calc
(∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag <| π.toPrepartition.biUnionIndex πi J'))) =
∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag J)) :=
sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => by rw [Prepartition.biUnionIndex_of_mem _ hJ hJ']
_ = vol J (f (π.tag J)) :=
(vol.map ⟨⟨fun g : E →L[ℝ] F => g (f (π.tag J)), rfl⟩, fun _ _ => rfl⟩).sum_partition_boxes
le_top (hπi J hJ)
theorem integralSum_inf_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I)
{π' : Prepartition I} (h : π'.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.infPrepartition π') = integralSum f vol π :=
integralSum_biUnion_partition f vol π _ fun _J hJ => h.restrict (Prepartition.le_of_mem _ hJ)
open Classical in
theorem integralSum_fiberwise {α} (g : Box ι → α) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
(∑ y ∈ π.boxes.image g, integralSum f vol (π.filter (g · = y))) = integralSum f vol π :=
π.sum_fiberwise g fun J => vol J (f <| π.tag J)
theorem integralSum_sub_partitions (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
{π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I} (h₁ : π₁.IsPartition) (h₂ : π₂.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol π₁ - integralSum f vol π₂ =
∑ J ∈ (π₁.toPrepartition ⊓ π₂.toPrepartition).boxes,
(vol J (f <| (π₁.infPrepartition π₂.toPrepartition).tag J) -
| vol J (f <| (π₂.infPrepartition π₁.toPrepartition).tag J)) := by
rw [← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₁ h₂, ← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₂ h₁,
integralSum, integralSum, Finset.sum_sub_distrib]
simp only [infPrepartition_toPrepartition, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_disjUnion (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) {π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I}
(h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
integralSum f vol (π₁.disjUnion π₂ h) = integralSum f vol π₁ + integralSum f vol π₂ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Basic.lean | 115 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Fabrizio Barroero. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fabrizio Barroero, Laura Capuano, Amos Turchet
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Matrix
import Mathlib.Data.Pi.Interval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Rify
/-!
# Siegel's Lemma
In this file we introduce and prove Siegel's Lemma in its most basic version. This is a fundamental
tool in diophantine approximation and transcendency and says that there exists a "small" integral
non-zero solution of a non-trivial underdetermined system of linear equations with integer
coefficients.
## Main results
- `exists_ne_zero_int_vec_norm_le`: Given a non-zero `m × n` matrix `A` with `m < n` the linear
system it determines has a non-zero integer solution `t` with
`‖t‖ ≤ ((n * ‖A‖) ^ ((m : ℝ) / (n - m)))`
## Notation
- `‖_‖ ` : Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup is the sup norm, the maximum of the absolute values of
the entries of the matrix
## References
See [M. Hindry and J. Silverman, Diophantine Geometry: an Introduction][hindrysilverman00].
-/
/- We set ‖⬝‖ to be Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup -/
attribute [local instance] Matrix.seminormedAddCommGroup
open Matrix Finset
namespace Int.Matrix
variable {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (A : Matrix α β ℤ)
-- Some definitions and relative properties
local notation3 "m" => Fintype.card α
local notation3 "n" => Fintype.card β
local notation3 "e" => m / ((n : ℝ) - m) -- exponent
local notation3 "B" => Nat.floor (((n : ℝ) * max 1 ‖A‖) ^ e)
-- B' is the vector with all components = B
local notation3 "B'" => fun _ : β => (B : ℤ)
-- T is the box [0 B]^n
local notation3 "T" => Finset.Icc 0 B'
local notation3 "P" => fun i : α => ∑ j : β, B * posPart (A i j)
local notation3 "N" => fun i : α => ∑ j : β, B * (- negPart (A i j))
-- S is the box where the image of T goes
local notation3 "S" => Finset.Icc N P
section preparation
/- In order to apply Pigeonhole we need:
# Step 1: ∀ v ∈ T, A *ᵥ v ∈ S
and
# Step 2: #S < #T
Pigeonhole will give different x and y in T with A.mulVec x = A.mulVec y in S
Their difference is the solution we are looking for
-/
-- # Step 1: ∀ v ∈ T, A *ᵥ v ∈ S
private lemma image_T_subset_S [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (v) (hv : v ∈ T) : A *ᵥ v ∈ S := by
rw [mem_Icc] at hv ⊢
have mulVec_def : A.mulVec v =
fun i ↦ Finset.sum univ fun j : β ↦ A i j * v j := rfl
rw [mulVec_def]
refine ⟨fun i ↦ ?_, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
all_goals
simp only [mul_neg]
gcongr ∑ _ : α, ?_ with j _ -- Get rid of sums
rw [← mul_comm (v j)] -- Move A i j to the right of the products
rcases le_total 0 (A i j) with hsign | hsign-- We have to distinguish cases: we have now 4 goals
· rw [negPart_eq_zero.2 hsign]
exact mul_nonneg (hv.1 j) hsign
· rw [negPart_eq_neg.2 hsign]
simp only [mul_neg, neg_neg]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right (hv.2 j) hsign
· rw [posPart_eq_self.2 hsign]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hv.2 j) hsign
· rw [posPart_eq_zero.2 hsign]
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hv.1 j) hsign
-- # Preparation for Step 2
private lemma card_T_eq [DecidableEq β] : #T = (B + 1) ^ n := by
rw [Pi.card_Icc 0 B']
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, card_Icc, sub_zero, toNat_natCast_add_one, prod_const, card_univ,
add_pos_iff, zero_lt_one, or_true]
-- This lemma is necessary to be able to apply the formula #(Icc a b) = b + 1 - a
private lemma N_le_P_add_one (i : α) : N i ≤ P i + 1 := by
calc N i
_ ≤ 0 := by
apply Finset.sum_nonpos
intro j _
simp only [mul_neg, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg B) (negPart_nonneg (A i j))
_ ≤ P i + 1 := by
apply le_trans (Finset.sum_nonneg _) (Int.le_add_one (le_refl P i))
intro j _
exact mul_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg B) (posPart_nonneg (A i j))
private lemma card_S_eq [DecidableEq α] : #(Finset.Icc N P) = ∏ i : α, (P i - N i + 1) := by
rw [Pi.card_Icc N P, Nat.cast_prod]
congr
ext i
rw [Int.card_Icc_of_le (N i) (P i) (N_le_P_add_one A i)]
exact add_sub_right_comm (P i) 1 (N i)
|
/-- The sup norm of a non-zero integer matrix is at least one -/
lemma one_le_norm_A_of_ne_zero (hA : A ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ ‖A‖ := by
by_contra! h
apply hA
ext i j
simp only [zero_apply]
rw [norm_lt_iff Real.zero_lt_one] at h
specialize h i j
rw [Int.norm_eq_abs] at h
norm_cast at h
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SiegelsLemma.lean | 117 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
| rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 461 | 465 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
/-!
# Pointwise operations on sets of reals
This file relates `sInf (a • s)`/`sSup (a • s)` with `a • sInf s`/`a • sSup s` for `s : Set ℝ`.
From these, it relates `⨅ i, a • f i` / `⨆ i, a • f i` with `a • (⨅ i, f i)` / `a • (⨆ i, f i)`,
and provides lemmas about distributing `*` over `⨅` and `⨆`.
## TODO
This is true more generally for conditionally complete linear order whose default value is `0`. We
don't have those yet.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section MulActionWithZero
variable [MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ] {a : α}
theorem Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (s : Set ℝ) : sInf (a • s) = a • sInf s := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sInf_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csInf_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddBelow s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRight ha').map_csInf' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow (mt (bddBelow_smul_iff_of_pos ha').1 h),
Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow h, smul_zero]
theorem Real.smul_iInf_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (f : ι → ℝ) : (a • ⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a • f i :=
(Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha _).symm.trans <| congr_arg sInf <| (range_comp _ _).symm
theorem Real.sSup_smul_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (s : Set ℝ) : sSup (a • s) = a • sSup s := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
| · rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sSup_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csSup_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddAbove s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRight ha').map_csSup' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove (mt (bddAbove_smul_iff_of_pos ha').1 h),
Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove h, smul_zero]
theorem Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (f : ι → ℝ) : (a • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a • f i :=
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pointwise.lean | 53 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
@[gcongr, bound]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
@[bound]
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx).le).2 hx
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
@[bound]
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
@[bound]
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx.le, not_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-16")]
alias log_nonpos_iff' := log_nonpos_iff
@[bound]
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff hx).2 h'x
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
| simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n with
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 267 | 271 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convolution
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.EulerSineProd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
/-!
# The Beta function, and further properties of the Gamma function
In this file we define the Beta integral, relate Beta and Gamma functions, and prove some
refined properties of the Gamma function using these relations.
## Results on the Beta function
* `Complex.betaIntegral`: the Beta function `Β(u, v)`, where `u`, `v` are complex with positive
real part.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`: the formula
`Gamma u * Gamma v = Gamma (u + v) * betaIntegral u v`.
## Results on the Gamma function
* `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}` we have `Γ s ≠ 0`.
* `Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`: for all `s`, the limit as `n → ∞` of the sequence
`n ↦ n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))` is `Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`: Euler's reflection formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (1 - s) = π / sin π s`.
* `Complex.differentiable_one_div_Gamma`: the function `1 / Γ(s)` is differentiable everywhere.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: Legendre's duplication formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (s + 1 / 2) = Gamma (2 * s) * 2 ^ (1 - 2 * s) * √π`.
* `Real.Gamma_ne_zero`, `Real.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`,
`Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`, `Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: real versions of the above.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat Topology Real
section BetaIntegral
/-! ## The Beta function -/
namespace Complex
/-- The Beta function `Β (u, v)`, defined as `∫ x:ℝ in 0..1, x ^ (u - 1) * (1 - x) ^ (v - 1)`. -/
noncomputable def betaIntegral (u v : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `betaIntegral_convergent`, showing convergence at the left endpoint. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent_left {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (v : ℂ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 (1 / 2) := by
apply IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2)] at hx
apply ContinuousAt.cpow
· exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
· exact continuousAt_const
· norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| by linarith only [hx.2]
/-- The Beta integral is convergent for all `u, v` of positive real part. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 1 := by
refine (betaIntegral_convergent_left hu v).trans ?_
rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg]
convert ((betaIntegral_convergent_left hv u).comp_add_right 1).symm using 1
· ext1 x
conv_lhs => rw [mul_comm]
congr 2 <;> · push_cast; ring
· norm_num
· norm_num
theorem betaIntegral_symm (u v : ℂ) : betaIntegral v u = betaIntegral u v := by
rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_add (a := 0) (b := 1) (c := -1)
(fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) neg_one_lt_zero.ne 1
rw [inv_neg, inv_one, neg_one_smul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_symm] at this
simp? at this says
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_add, ofReal_neg, ofReal_one, sub_add_cancel_right, neg_neg,
mul_one, neg_add_cancel, mul_zero, zero_add] at this
conv_lhs at this => arg 1; intro x; rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
exact this
theorem betaIntegral_eval_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) : betaIntegral u 1 = 1 / u := by
simp_rw [betaIntegral, sub_self, cpow_zero, mul_one]
rw [integral_cpow (Or.inl _)]
· rw [ofReal_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, zero_cpow, sub_zero, sub_add_cancel]
rw [sub_add_cancel]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
· rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← sub_pos, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem betaIntegral_scaled (s t : ℂ) {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
∫ x in (0)..a, (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * ((a : ℂ) - x) ^ (t - 1) =
(a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) * betaIntegral s t := by
have ha' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha.ne'
rw [betaIntegral]
have A : (a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) = a * ((a : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (a : ℂ) ^ (t - 1)) := by
rw [(by abel : s + t - 1 = 1 + (s - 1) + (t - 1)), cpow_add _ _ ha', cpow_add 1 _ ha', cpow_one,
mul_assoc]
rw [A, mul_assoc, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, ← real_smul, ← zero_div a, ←
div_self ha.ne', ← intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div _ ha.ne', zero_div]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le ha.le]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
congr 1
· rw [← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (div_pos hx.1 ha).le, ofReal_div, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
· rw [(by norm_cast : (1 : ℂ) - ↑(x / a) = ↑(1 - x / a)), ←
mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (sub_nonneg.mpr <| (div_le_one ha).mpr hx.2)]
push_cast
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
/-- Relation between Beta integral and Gamma function. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral {s t : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) (ht : 0 < re t) :
Gamma s * Gamma t = Gamma (s + t) * betaIntegral s t := by
-- Note that we haven't proved (yet) that the Gamma function has no zeroes, so we can't formulate
-- this as a formula for the Beta function.
have conv_int := integral_posConvolution
(GammaIntegral_convergent hs) (GammaIntegral_convergent ht) (ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℂ)
simp_rw [ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply'] at conv_int
have hst : 0 < re (s + t) := by rw [add_re]; exact add_pos hs ht
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs, Gamma_eq_integral ht, Gamma_eq_integral hst, GammaIntegral,
GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← conv_int, ← MeasureTheory.integral_mul_const (betaIntegral _ _)]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_assoc, ← betaIntegral_scaled s t hx, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
congr 1 with y : 1
push_cast
suffices Complex.exp (-x) = Complex.exp (-y) * Complex.exp (-(x - y)) by rw [this]; ring
rw [← Complex.exp_add]; congr 1; abel
/-- Recurrence formula for the Beta function. -/
theorem betaIntegral_recurrence {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
u * betaIntegral u (v + 1) = v * betaIntegral (u + 1) v := by
-- NB: If we knew `Gamma (u + v + 1) ≠ 0` this would be an easy consequence of
-- `Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`; but we don't know that yet. We will prove it later, but
-- this lemma is needed in the proof. So we give a (somewhat laborious) direct argument.
let F : ℝ → ℂ := fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ u * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ v
have hu' : 0 < re (u + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
have hv' : 0 < re (v + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
have hc : ContinuousOn F (Icc 0 1) := by
refine (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_).mul
(continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_)
· refine (continuousAt_cpow_const_of_re_pos (Or.inl ?_) hu).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
rw [ofReal_re]; exact hx.1
· refine (continuousAt_cpow_const_of_re_pos (Or.inl ?_) hv).comp
(continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
rw [sub_re, one_re, ofReal_re, sub_nonneg]
exact hx.2
have hder : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 →
HasDerivAt F (u * ((x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ v) -
v * ((x : ℂ) ^ u * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have U : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ u) (u * (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1)) ↑x := by
have := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ u (hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)) (Or.inl ?_)
· simp only [id_eq, mul_one] at this
exact this
· rw [id_eq, ofReal_re]; exact hx.1
have V : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => (1 - y) ^ v) (-v * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) ↑x := by
have A := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ v (hasDerivAt_id (1 - (x : ℂ))) (Or.inl ?_)
swap; · rw [id, sub_re, one_re, ofReal_re, sub_pos]; exact hx.2
simp_rw [id] at A
have B : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => 1 - y) (-1) ↑x := by
apply HasDerivAt.const_sub; apply hasDerivAt_id
convert HasDerivAt.comp (↑x) A B using 1
ring
convert (U.mul V).comp_ofReal using 1
ring
have h_int := ((betaIntegral_convergent hu hv').const_mul u).sub
((betaIntegral_convergent hu' hv).const_mul v)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right] at h_int
have int_ev := intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le zero_le_one hc hder h_int
have hF0 : F 0 = 0 := by
simp only [F, mul_eq_zero, ofReal_zero, cpow_eq_zero_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Ne,
true_and, sub_zero, one_cpow, one_ne_zero, or_false]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
have hF1 : F 1 = 0 := by
simp only [F, mul_eq_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_ne_zero, sub_self, cpow_eq_zero_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, Ne, true_and, false_or]
contrapose! hv; rw [hv, zero_re]
rw [hF0, hF1, sub_zero, intervalIntegral.integral_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul,
intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul] at int_ev
· rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral, ← sub_eq_zero]
convert int_ev <;> ring
· apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
convert betaIntegral_convergent hu hv'; ring
· apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
convert betaIntegral_convergent hu' hv; ring
/-- Explicit formula for the Beta function when second argument is a positive integer. -/
theorem betaIntegral_eval_nat_add_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (n : ℕ) :
betaIntegral u (n + 1) = n ! / ∏ j ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (u + j) := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing u
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, betaIntegral_eval_one_right hu, Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
simp
· have := betaIntegral_recurrence hu (?_ : 0 < re n.succ)
swap; · rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]; positivity
rw [mul_comm u _, ← eq_div_iff] at this
swap; · contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
rw [this, Finset.prod_range_succ', Nat.cast_succ, IH]
swap; · rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, ←
mul_div_assoc, ← div_div]
congr 3 with j : 1
push_cast; abel
end Complex
end BetaIntegral
section LimitFormula
/-! ## The Euler limit formula -/
namespace Complex
/-- The sequence with `n`-th term `n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))`, for complex `s`.
We will show that this tends to `Γ(s)` as `n → ∞`. -/
noncomputable def GammaSeq (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :=
(n : ℂ) ^ s * n ! / ∏ j ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (s + j)
theorem GammaSeq_eq_betaIntegral_of_re_pos {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) (n : ℕ) :
GammaSeq s n = (n : ℂ) ^ s * betaIntegral s (n + 1) := by
rw [GammaSeq, betaIntegral_eval_nat_add_one_right hs n, ← mul_div_assoc]
theorem GammaSeq_add_one_left (s : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq (s + 1) n / s = n / (n + 1 + s) * GammaSeq s n := by
conv_lhs => rw [GammaSeq, Finset.prod_range_succ, div_div]
conv_rhs =>
rw [GammaSeq, Finset.prod_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, div_mul_div_comm, ← mul_assoc,
← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (Finset.prod _ _)]
congr 3
· rw [cpow_add _ _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn), cpow_one, mul_comm]
· refine Finset.prod_congr (by rfl) fun x _ => ?_
push_cast; ring
· abel
theorem GammaSeq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq s n = ∫ x : ℝ in (0)..n, ↑((1 - x / n) ^ n) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) := by
have : ∀ x : ℝ, x = x / n * n := by intro x; rw [div_mul_cancel₀]; exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
conv_rhs => enter [1, x, 2, 1]; rw [this x]
rw [GammaSeq_eq_betaIntegral_of_re_pos hs]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div (a := 0) (b := n)
(fun x => ↑((1 - x) ^ n) * ↑(x * ↑n) ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn)
dsimp only at this
rw [betaIntegral, this, real_smul, zero_div, div_self, add_sub_cancel_right,
← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
swap; · exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le zero_le_one]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
have hn' : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
have A : (n : ℂ) ^ s = (n : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * n := by
conv_lhs => rw [(by ring : s = s - 1 + 1), cpow_add _ _ hn']
simp
have B : ((x : ℂ) * ↑n) ^ (s - 1) = (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (n : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast,
mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hx.1.le (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)).le]
rw [A, B, cpow_natCast]; ring
/-- The main technical lemma for `GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`, expressing the integral defining the
Gamma function for `0 < re s` as the limit of a sequence of integrals over finite intervals. -/
theorem approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∫ x : ℝ in (0)..n, ((1 - x / n) ^ n : ℝ) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)) atTop
(𝓝 <| Gamma s) := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
-- We apply dominated convergence to the following function, which we will show is uniformly
-- bounded above by the Gamma integrand `exp (-x) * x ^ (re s - 1)`.
let f : ℕ → ℝ → ℂ := fun n =>
indicator (Ioc 0 (n : ℝ)) fun x : ℝ => ((1 - x / n) ^ n : ℝ) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)
-- integrability of f
have f_ible : ∀ n : ℕ, Integrable (f n) (volume.restrict (Ioi 0)) := by
intro n
rw [integrable_indicator_iff (measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc (_ : ℝ) _)), IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Ioi_self, ← IntegrableOn, ←
intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ n)]
apply IntervalIntegrable.continuousOn_mul
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply Continuous.continuousOn
continuity
-- pointwise limit of f
have f_tends : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioi (0 : ℝ) →
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| ↑(Real.exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)) := by
intro x hx
apply Tendsto.congr'
· show ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ↑((1 - x / n) ^ n) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) = f n x
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop ⌈x⌉₊] with n hn
rw [Nat.ceil_le] at hn
dsimp only [f]
rw [indicator_of_mem]
exact ⟨hx, hn⟩
· simp_rw [mul_comm]
refine (Tendsto.comp (continuous_ofReal.tendsto _) ?_).const_mul _
convert tendsto_one_plus_div_pow_exp (-x) using 1
ext1 n
rw [neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- let `convert` identify the remaining goals
convert tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence _ (fun n => (f_ible n).1)
(Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs) _
((ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ f_tends)) using 1
-- limit of f is the integrand we want
· ext1 n
rw [MeasureTheory.integral_indicator (measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc (_ : ℝ) _)),
intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ)),
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Ioi_self]
-- f is uniformly bounded by the Gamma integrand
· intro n
rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi]
filter_upwards with x hx
dsimp only [f]
rcases lt_or_le (n : ℝ) x with (hxn | hxn)
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioc_of_gt hxn), norm_zero,
mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _
· rw [indicator_of_mem (mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨mem_Ioi.mp hx, hxn⟩), norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg
(pow_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr <| div_le_one_of_le₀ hxn <| by positivity) _),
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re, mul_le_mul_right (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)]
exact one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg hxn
/-- Euler's limit formula for the complex Gamma function. -/
theorem GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma (s : ℂ) : Tendsto (GammaSeq s) atTop (𝓝 <| Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ m : ℕ, -↑m < re s → Tendsto (GammaSeq s) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaAux m s) by
rw [Gamma]
apply this
rw [neg_lt]
rcases lt_or_le 0 (re s) with (hs | hs)
· exact (neg_neg_of_pos hs).trans_le (Nat.cast_nonneg _)
· refine (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).trans_le ?_
rw [sub_eq_neg_add, Nat.floor_add_one (neg_nonneg.mpr hs), Nat.cast_add_one]
intro m
induction' m with m IH generalizing s
· -- Base case: `0 < re s`, so Gamma is given by the integral formula
intro hs
rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
rw [← Gamma_eq_GammaAux]
· refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral hs)
refine (eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn => ?_)
exact (GammaSeq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral hs hn).symm
· rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_lt_zero]
· -- Induction step: use recurrence formulae in `s` for Gamma and GammaSeq
intro hs
rw [Nat.cast_succ, neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, ← one_re, ← add_re] at hs
rw [GammaAux]
have := @Tendsto.congr' _ _ _ ?_ _ _
((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn => ?_)) ((IH _ hs).div_const s)
pick_goal 3; · exact GammaSeq_add_one_left s hn -- doesn't work if inlined?
conv at this => arg 1; intro n; rw [mul_comm]
rwa [← mul_one (GammaAux m (s + 1) / s), tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℂ)] at this
simp_rw [add_assoc]
exact tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop (1 + s)
end Complex
end LimitFormula
section GammaReflection
/-! ## The reflection formula -/
namespace Complex
theorem GammaSeq_mul (z : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq z n * GammaSeq (1 - z) n =
n / (n + ↑1 - z) * (↑1 / (z * ∏ j ∈ Finset.range n, (↑1 - z ^ 2 / ((j : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2))) := by
-- also true for n = 0 but we don't need it
have aux : ∀ a b c d : ℂ, a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by intros; ring
rw [GammaSeq, GammaSeq, div_mul_div_comm, aux, ← pow_two]
have : (n : ℂ) ^ z * (n : ℂ) ^ (1 - z) = n := by
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn), add_sub_cancel, cpow_one]
rw [this, Finset.prod_range_succ', Finset.prod_range_succ, aux, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib,
Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, add_comm (1 - z) n, ← add_sub_assoc]
have : ∀ j : ℕ, (z + ↑(j + 1)) * (↑1 - z + ↑j) =
((j + 1) ^ 2 :) * (↑1 - z ^ 2 / ((j : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2) := by
intro j
push_cast
have : (j : ℂ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.succ_ne_zero j
field_simp; ring
simp_rw [this]
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Nat.cast_prod, Finset.prod_pow,
Finset.prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial, Nat.cast_pow,
(by intros; ring : ∀ a b c d : ℂ, a * b * (c * d) = a * (d * (b * c))), ← div_div,
mul_div_cancel_right₀, ← div_div, mul_comm z _, mul_one_div]
exact pow_ne_zero 2 (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n)
/-- Euler's reflection formula for the complex Gamma function. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub (z : ℂ) : Gamma z * Gamma (1 - z) = π / sin (π * z) := by
have pi_ne : (π : ℂ) ≠ 0 := Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero
by_cases hs : sin (↑π * z) = 0
· -- first deal with silly case z = integer
rw [hs, div_zero]
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← Complex.sin_neg, ← mul_neg, Complex.sin_eq_zero_iff, mul_comm] at hs
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hs
rw [mul_eq_mul_right_iff, eq_false (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_pos.ne'), or_false,
neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hk
rw [hk]
cases k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero, zero_mul]
· rw [Int.cast_negSucc, neg_neg, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_comm, sub_add_cancel_left,
Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero, mul_zero]
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ((GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma z).mul (GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma <| 1 - z)) ?_
have : ↑π / sin (↑π * z) = 1 * (π / sin (π * z)) := by rw [one_mul]
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn =>
(GammaSeq_mul z hn).symm)) (Tendsto.mul _ _)
· convert tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop (1 - z) using 1; ext1 n; rw [add_sub_assoc]
· have : ↑π / sin (↑π * z) = 1 / (sin (π * z) / π) := by field_simp
convert tendsto_const_nhds.div _ (div_ne_zero hs pi_ne)
rw [← tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero tendsto_const_nhds pi_ne, div_mul_cancel₀ _ pi_ne]
convert tendsto_euler_sin_prod z using 1
ext1 n; rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
/-- The Gamma function does not vanish on `ℂ` (except at non-positive integers, where the function
is mathematically undefined and we set it to `0` by convention). -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
by_cases h_im : s.im = 0
· have : s = ↑s.re := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Complex.re_add_im s]
rw [h_im, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
rw [this, Gamma_ofReal, ofReal_ne_zero]
refine Real.Gamma_ne_zero fun n => ?_
specialize hs n
contrapose! hs
rwa [this, ← ofReal_natCast, ← ofReal_neg, ofReal_inj]
· have : sin (↑π * s) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Complex.sin_ne_zero_iff]
intro k
apply_fun im
rw [im_ofReal_mul, ← ofReal_intCast, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]
exact mul_ne_zero Real.pi_pos.ne' h_im
have A := div_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr Real.pi_pos.ne') this
rw [← Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub s, mul_ne_zero_iff] at A
exact A.1
theorem Gamma_eq_zero_iff (s : ℂ) : Gamma s = 0 ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, s = -m := by
constructor
· contrapose!; exact Gamma_ne_zero
· rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩; exact Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero m
/-- A weaker, but easier-to-apply, version of `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`. -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero_of_re_pos {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
refine Gamma_ne_zero fun m => ?_
contrapose! hs
simpa only [hs, neg_re, ← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re, neg_nonpos] using Nat.cast_nonneg _
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The sequence with `n`-th term `n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))`, for real `s`. We
will show that this tends to `Γ(s)` as `n → ∞`. -/
noncomputable def GammaSeq (s : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :=
(n : ℝ) ^ s * n ! / ∏ j ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (s + j)
/-- Euler's limit formula for the real Gamma function. -/
theorem GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma (s : ℝ) : Tendsto (GammaSeq s) atTop (𝓝 <| Gamma s) := by
suffices Tendsto ((↑) ∘ GammaSeq s : ℕ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 <| Complex.Gamma s) by
| exact (Complex.continuous_re.tendsto (Complex.Gamma ↑s)).comp this
convert Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma s
ext1 n
dsimp only [GammaSeq, Function.comp_apply, Complex.GammaSeq]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean | 471 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Thickenings in pseudo-metric spaces
## Main definitions
* `Metric.thickening δ s`, the open thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space.
* `Metric.cthickening δ s`, the closed thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric
space.
## Main results
* `Disjoint.exists_thickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint thickenings
* `Disjoint.exists_cthickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint closed thickenings
* `IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open`: if `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`,
some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`.
* `Metric.hasBasis_nhdsSet_cthickening`: the `cthickening`s of a compact set `K` form a basis
of the neighbourhoods of `K`
* `Metric.closure_eq_iInter_cthickening'`: the closure of a set equals the intersection
of its closed thickenings of positive radii accumulating at zero.
The same holds for open thickenings.
* `IsCompact.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall`: if `s` is compact, `cthickening δ s` is the union
of `closedBall`s of radius `δ` around `x : E`.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u}
namespace Metric
section Thickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
def thickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E < ENNReal.ofReal δ }
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt : x ∈ thickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
(open) `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_thickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.thickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hδ.le).trans ε_lt.le
/-- The (open) thickening equals the preimage of an open interval under `EMetric.infEdist`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E = (infEdist · E) ⁻¹' Iio (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The (open) thickening is an open set. -/
theorem isOpen_thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsOpen (thickening δ E) :=
Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_infEdist _ isOpen_Iio
/-- The (open) thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem thickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : thickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [thickening, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, not_top_lt]
theorem thickening_of_nonpos (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (s : Set α) : thickening δ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ => ((ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hδ).trans_le bot_le).not_lt
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function of
the thickening radius `δ`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem thickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iio_subset_Iio (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem thickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickening δ E₁ ⊆ thickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (infEdist_anti h) hx
theorem mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The frontier of the (open) thickening of a set is contained in an `EMetric.infEdist` level
set. -/
theorem frontier_thickening_subset (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} :
frontier (thickening δ E) ⊆ { x : α | infEdist x E = ENNReal.ofReal δ } :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq continuous_infEdist continuous_const
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem frontier_thickening_disjoint (A : Set α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun r : ℝ => frontier (thickening r A)) := by
refine (pairwise_disjoint_on _).2 fun r₁ r₂ hr => ?_
rcases le_total r₁ 0 with h₁ | h₁
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos h₁]
refine ((disjoint_singleton.2 fun h => hr.ne ?_).preimage _).mono (frontier_thickening_subset _)
(frontier_thickening_subset _)
apply_fun ENNReal.toReal at h
rwa [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h₁, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (h₁.trans hr.le)] at h
/-- Any set is contained in the complement of the δ-thickening of the complement of its
δ-thickening. -/
lemma subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
E ⊆ (thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
intro x x_in_E
simp only [thickening, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
apply EMetric.le_infEdist.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at hy
simpa only [edist_comm] using le_trans hy <| EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem x_in_E
/-- The δ-thickening of the complement of the δ-thickening of a set is contained in the complement
of the set. -/
lemma thickening_compl_thickening_self_subset_compl (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ ⊆ Eᶜ := by
apply compl_subset_compl.mp
simpa only [compl_compl] using subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self δ E
variable {X : Type u} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt {E : Set X} {x : X} (h : E.Nonempty) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ infDist x E < δ :=
lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top h)
/-- A point in a metric space belongs to the (open) `δ`-thickening of a subset `E` if and only if
it is at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
theorem mem_thickening_iff {E : Set X} {x : X} : x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, dist x z < δ := by
have key_iff : ∀ z : X, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ ↔ dist x z < δ := fun z ↦ by
rw [dist_edist, lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _)]
simp_rw [mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt, key_iff]
@[simp]
theorem thickening_singleton (δ : ℝ) (x : X) : thickening δ ({x} : Set X) = ball x δ := by
ext
simp [mem_thickening_iff]
theorem ball_subset_thickening {x : X} {E : Set X} (hx : x ∈ E) (δ : ℝ) :
ball x δ ⊆ thickening δ E :=
Subset.trans (by simp [Subset.rfl]) (thickening_subset_of_subset δ <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a metric space equals the
union of balls of radius `δ` centered at points of `E`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_biUnion_ball {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} : thickening δ E = ⋃ x ∈ E, ball x δ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion₂, exists_prop]
exact mem_thickening_iff
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} (h : IsBounded E) :
IsBounded (thickening δ E) := by
rcases E.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· simp
· refine (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall x).2 ⟨δ + diam E, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist y x ≤ infDist y E + diam E := dist_le_infDist_add_diam (x := y) h hx
_ ≤ δ + diam E := add_le_add_right ((mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt ⟨x, hx⟩).1 hy).le _
| end Thickening
section Cthickening
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 169 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
/-! # Quadratic form on product and pi types
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticForm.prod Q₁ Q₂`: the quadratic form constructed elementwise on a product
* `QuadraticForm.pi Q`: the quadratic form constructed elementwise on a pi type
## Main results
* `QuadraticForm.Equivalent.prod`, `QuadraticForm.Equivalent.pi`: quadratic forms are equivalent
if their components are equivalent
* `QuadraticForm.nonneg_prod_iff`, `QuadraticForm.nonneg_pi_iff`: quadratic forms are positive-
semidefinite if and only if their components are positive-semidefinite.
* `QuadraticForm.posDef_prod_iff`, `QuadraticForm.posDef_pi_iff`: quadratic forms are positive-
definite if and only if their components are positive-definite.
## Implementation notes
Many of the lemmas in this file could be generalized into results about sums of positive and
non-negative elements, and would generalize to any map `Q` where `Q 0 = 0`, not just quadratic
forms specifically.
-/
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M₁ M₂ N₁ N₂ P : Type*} {Mᵢ Nᵢ : ι → Type*}
namespace QuadraticMap
section Prod
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module R P]
/-- Construct a quadratic form on a product of two modules from the quadratic form on each module.
-/
@[simps!]
def prod (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) : QuadraticMap R (M₁ × M₂) P :=
Q₁.comp (LinearMap.fst _ _ _) + Q₂.comp (LinearMap.snd _ _ _)
/-- An isometry between quadratic forms generated by `QuadraticForm.prod` can be constructed
from a pair of isometries between the left and right parts. -/
@[simps toLinearEquiv]
def IsometryEquiv.prod
{Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
{Q₁' : QuadraticMap R N₁ P} {Q₂' : QuadraticMap R N₂ P}
(e₁ : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₁') (e₂ : Q₂.IsometryEquiv Q₂') :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsometryEquiv (Q₁'.prod Q₂') where
map_app' x := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (e₁.map_app x.1) (e₂.map_app x.2)
toLinearEquiv := LinearEquiv.prodCongr e₁.toLinearEquiv e₂.toLinearEquiv
/-- `LinearMap.inl` as an isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.inl (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) : Q₁ →qᵢ (Q₁.prod Q₂) where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.inl R _ _
map_app' m₁ := by simp
/-- `LinearMap.inr` as an isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.inr (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) : Q₂ →qᵢ (Q₁.prod Q₂) where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.inr R _ _
map_app' m₁ := by simp
variable (M₂) in
/-- `LinearMap.fst` as an isometry, when the second space has the zero quadratic form. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.fst (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) : (Q₁.prod (0 : QuadraticMap R M₂ P)) →qᵢ Q₁ where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.fst R _ _
map_app' m₁ := by simp
variable (M₁) in
/-- `LinearMap.snd` as an isometry, when the first space has the zero quadratic form. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.snd (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) : ((0 : QuadraticMap R M₁ P).prod Q₂) →qᵢ Q₂ where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.snd R _ _
map_app' m₁ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma Isometry.fst_comp_inl (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) :
(fst M₂ Q₁).comp (inl Q₁ (0 : QuadraticMap R M₂ P)) = .id _ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma Isometry.snd_comp_inr (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) :
(snd M₁ Q₂).comp (inr (0 : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) Q₂) = .id _ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma Isometry.snd_comp_inl (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) :
(snd M₁ Q₂).comp (inl (0 : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) Q₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma Isometry.fst_comp_inr (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) :
(fst M₂ Q₁).comp (inr Q₁ (0 : QuadraticMap R M₂ P)) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem Equivalent.prod {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
{Q₁' : QuadraticMap R N₁ P} {Q₂' : QuadraticMap R N₂ P} (e₁ : Q₁.Equivalent Q₁')
(e₂ : Q₂.Equivalent Q₂') : (Q₁.prod Q₂).Equivalent (Q₁'.prod Q₂') :=
Nonempty.map2 IsometryEquiv.prod e₁ e₂
/-- `LinearEquiv.prodComm` is isometric. -/
@[simps!]
def IsometryEquiv.prodComm (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsometryEquiv (Q₂.prod Q₁) where
toLinearEquiv := LinearEquiv.prodComm _ _ _
map_app' _ := add_comm _ _
/-- `LinearEquiv.prodProdProdComm` is isometric. -/
@[simps!]
def IsometryEquiv.prodProdProdComm
(Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P)
(Q₃ : QuadraticMap R N₁ P) (Q₄ : QuadraticMap R N₂ P) :
((Q₁.prod Q₂).prod (Q₃.prod Q₄)).IsometryEquiv ((Q₁.prod Q₃).prod (Q₂.prod Q₄)) where
toLinearEquiv := LinearEquiv.prodProdProdComm _ _ _ _ _
map_app' _ := add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
/-- If a product is anisotropic then its components must be. The converse is not true. -/
theorem anisotropic_of_prod
{Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P} (h : (Q₁.prod Q₂).Anisotropic) :
Q₁.Anisotropic ∧ Q₂.Anisotropic := by
simp_rw [Anisotropic, prod_apply, Prod.forall, Prod.mk_eq_zero] at h
constructor
· intro x hx
refine (h x 0 ?_).1
rw [hx, zero_add, map_zero]
· intro x hx
refine (h 0 x ?_).2
rw [hx, add_zero, map_zero]
theorem nonneg_prod_iff [Preorder P] [AddLeftMono P]
{Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P} :
(∀ x, 0 ≤ (Q₁.prod Q₂) x) ↔ (∀ x, 0 ≤ Q₁ x) ∧ ∀ x, 0 ≤ Q₂ x := by
simp_rw [Prod.forall, prod_apply]
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· intro x; simpa only [add_zero, map_zero] using h x 0
· intro x; simpa only [zero_add, map_zero] using h 0 x
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x₁ x₂
exact add_nonneg (h₁ x₁) (h₂ x₂)
theorem posDef_prod_iff [PartialOrder P] [AddLeftMono P]
{Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P} :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).PosDef ↔ Q₁.PosDef ∧ Q₂.PosDef := by
simp_rw [posDef_iff_nonneg, nonneg_prod_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hle₁, hle₂⟩, ha⟩
obtain ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩ := anisotropic_of_prod ha
exact ⟨⟨hle₁, ha₁⟩, ⟨hle₂, ha₂⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hle₁, ha₁⟩, ⟨hle₂, ha₂⟩⟩
refine ⟨⟨hle₁, hle₂⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ (hx : Q₁ x₁ + Q₂ x₂ = 0)
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hle₁ x₁) (hle₂ x₂), ha₁.eq_zero_iff, ha₂.eq_zero_iff] at hx
rwa [Prod.mk_eq_zero]
theorem PosDef.prod [PartialOrder P] [AddLeftMono P]
{Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P} (h₁ : Q₁.PosDef) (h₂ : Q₂.PosDef) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).PosDef :=
posDef_prod_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem IsOrtho.prod {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
{v w : M₁ × M₂} (h₁ : Q₁.IsOrtho v.1 w.1) (h₂ : Q₂.IsOrtho v.2 w.2) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsOrtho v w :=
(congr_arg₂ HAdd.hAdd h₁ h₂).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem IsOrtho.inl_inr {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
(m₁ : M₁) (m₂ : M₂) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsOrtho (m₁, 0) (0, m₂) :=
QuadraticMap.IsOrtho.prod (.zero_right _) (.zero_left _)
@[simp] theorem IsOrtho.inr_inl {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
(m₁ : M₁) (m₂ : M₂) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsOrtho (0, m₂) (m₁, 0) := (IsOrtho.inl_inr _ _).symm
@[simp] theorem isOrtho_inl_inl_iff {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
(m₁ m₁' : M₁) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsOrtho (m₁, 0) (m₁', 0) ↔ Q₁.IsOrtho m₁ m₁' := by
simp [isOrtho_def]
@[simp] theorem isOrtho_inr_inr_iff {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P}
(m₂ m₂' : M₂) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).IsOrtho (0, m₂) (0, m₂') ↔ Q₂.IsOrtho m₂ m₂' := by
simp [isOrtho_def]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup P]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R P]
@[simp] theorem polar_prod (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) (x y : M₁ × M₂) :
polar (Q₁.prod Q₂) x y = polar Q₁ x.1 y.1 + polar Q₂ x.2 y.2 := by
dsimp [polar]
abel
@[simp] theorem polarBilin_prod (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) :
(Q₁.prod Q₂).polarBilin =
Q₁.polarBilin.compl₁₂ (.fst R M₁ M₂) (.fst R M₁ M₂) +
Q₂.polarBilin.compl₁₂ (.snd R M₁ M₂) (.snd R M₁ M₂) :=
LinearMap.ext₂ <| polar_prod _ _
@[simp] theorem associated_prod [Invertible (2 : R)]
(Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ P) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ P) :
associated (Q₁.prod Q₂) =
(associated Q₁).compl₁₂ (.fst R M₁ M₂) (.fst R M₁ M₂) +
(associated Q₂).compl₁₂ (.snd R M₁ M₂) (.snd R M₁ M₂) := by
dsimp [associated, associatedHom]
rw [polarBilin_prod, smul_add]
rfl
end Ring
end Prod
section Pi
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Nᵢ i)] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, Module R (Nᵢ i)] [Module R P]
/-- Construct a quadratic form on a family of modules from the quadratic form on each module. -/
def pi [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) : QuadraticMap R (∀ i, Mᵢ i) P :=
∑ i, (Q i).comp (LinearMap.proj i : _ →ₗ[R] Mᵢ i)
@[simp]
theorem pi_apply [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) (x : ∀ i, Mᵢ i) :
pi Q x = ∑ i, Q i (x i) :=
sum_apply _ _ _
theorem pi_apply_single [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) (i : ι) (m : Mᵢ i) :
pi Q (Pi.single i m) = Q i m := by
rw [pi_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i fun j hj => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hj, map_zero]
/-- An isometry between quadratic forms generated by `QuadraticMap.pi` can be constructed
from a pair of isometries between the left and right parts. -/
@[simps toLinearEquiv]
def IsometryEquiv.pi [Fintype ι]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P} {Q' : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Nᵢ i) P}
(e : ∀ i, (Q i).IsometryEquiv (Q' i)) : (pi Q).IsometryEquiv (pi Q') where
map_app' x := by
simp only [pi_apply, LinearEquiv.piCongrRight, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
IsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, IsometryEquiv.map_app]
toLinearEquiv := LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun i => (e i : Mᵢ i ≃ₗ[R] Nᵢ i)
/-- `LinearMap.single` as an isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.single [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) (i : ι) :
Q i →qᵢ pi Q where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.single _ _ i
map_app' := pi_apply_single _ _
/-- `LinearMap.proj` as an isometry, when all but one quadratic form is zero. -/
@[simps!]
def Isometry.proj [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (Q : QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) :
pi (Pi.single i Q) →qᵢ Q where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.proj i
map_app' m := by
dsimp
rw [pi_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i (fun j hij => ?_), Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hij, zero_apply]
/-- Note that `QuadraticMap.Isometry.id` would not be well-typed as the RHS. -/
@[simp]
theorem Isometry.proj_comp_single_of_same [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(i : ι) (Q : QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) :
(proj i Q).comp (single _ i) = .ofEq (Pi.single_eq_same _ _) :=
ext fun _ => Pi.single_eq_same _ _
/-- Note that `0 : 0 →qᵢ Q` alone would not be well-typed as the RHS. -/
@[simp]
theorem Isometry.proj_comp_single_of_ne [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
{i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (Q : QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P) :
(proj i Q).comp (single _ j) = (0 : 0 →qᵢ Q).comp (ofEq (Pi.single_eq_of_ne h.symm _)) :=
ext fun _ => Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem Equivalent.pi [Fintype ι] {Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P}
{Q' : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Nᵢ i) P} (e : ∀ i, (Q i).Equivalent (Q' i)) :
(pi Q).Equivalent (pi Q') :=
⟨IsometryEquiv.pi fun i => Classical.choice (e i)⟩
/-- If a family is anisotropic then its components must be. The converse is not true. -/
theorem anisotropic_of_pi [Fintype ι]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P} (h : (pi Q).Anisotropic) : ∀ i, (Q i).Anisotropic := by
simp_rw [Anisotropic, pi_apply, funext_iff, Pi.zero_apply] at h
intro i x hx
classical
have := h (Pi.single i x) ?_ i
· rw [Pi.single_eq_same] at this
exact this
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j _
by_cases hji : j = i
· subst hji; rw [Pi.single_eq_same, hx]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hji, map_zero]
theorem nonneg_pi_iff {P} [Fintype ι] [AddCommMonoid P] [PartialOrder P] [IsOrderedAddMonoid P]
[Module R P]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P} : (∀ x, 0 ≤ pi Q x) ↔ ∀ i x, 0 ≤ Q i x := by
simp_rw [pi, sum_apply, comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply]
constructor
-- TODO: does this generalize to a useful lemma independent of `QuadraticMap`?
· intro h i x
classical
convert h (Pi.single i x) using 1
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i (Finset.mem_univ _) fun j _ hji => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hji, map_zero]
· rintro h x
| exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun i _ => h i (x i)
theorem posDef_pi_iff {P} [Fintype ι] [AddCommMonoid P] [PartialOrder P] [IsOrderedAddMonoid P]
[Module R P]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticMap R (Mᵢ i) P} : (pi Q).PosDef ↔ ∀ i, (Q i).PosDef := by
simp_rw [posDef_iff_nonneg, nonneg_pi_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hle, ha⟩
intro i
exact ⟨hle i, anisotropic_of_pi ha i⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i => (h i).1, fun x hx => funext fun i => (h i).2 _ ?_⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Prod.lean | 328 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the module `Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs`.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the
definitions file, as well as extra lemmas for functions defined in the definitions file and
`Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations` (empty set, univ, union, intersection, insert, singleton,
set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
theorem setOf_injective : Function.Injective (@setOf α) := injective_id
theorem setOf_inj {p q : α → Prop} : { x | p x } = { x | q x } ↔ p = q := Iff.rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- This lemma is intended for use with `rw` where a membership predicate is needed,
hence the explicit argument and the equality in the reverse direction from normal.
See also `Set.mem_setOf_eq` for the reverse direction applied to an argument. -/
theorem eq_mem_setOf (p : α → Prop) : p = (· ∈ {a | p a}) := rfl
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem not_top_subset : ¬⊤ ⊆ s ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
simp [not_subset]
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
theorem ssubset_iff_exists {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, Set.exists_of_ssubset h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ (Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h1).mpr h2⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty ↥s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
-- Redeclare for refined keys
-- `Nonempty (@Subtype _ (@Membership.mem _ (Set _) _ (@Top.top (Set _) _)))`
instance instNonemptyTop [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (⊤ : Set α) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nonempty (univ : Set α))
theorem Nonempty.of_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty := nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype := Nonempty.of_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (or_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_or _)
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_left_iff : s ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
left_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_right_iff : t ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
right_lt_sup
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_and _)
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_right_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
inf_lt_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_left_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ s ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
inf_lt_left
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and]
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
end Sep
/-- See also `Set.sdiff_inter_right_comm`. -/
lemma inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) := inf_sdiff_assoc ..
/-- See also `Set.inter_diff_assoc`. -/
lemma sdiff_inter_right_comm (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ t := sdiff_inf_right_comm ..
lemma inter_sdiff_left_comm (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = t ∩ (s \ u) := inf_sdiff_left_comm ..
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
/-- A version of `diff_union_diff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel' (hi : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : (s \ t) ∪ (t \ u) = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' hi hu
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s \ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem diff_inter_distrib_right (s t r : Set α) : (t ∩ r) \ s = (t \ s) ∩ (r \ s) :=
inf_sdiff
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma inl_compl_union_inr_compl {α β : Type*} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
Sum.inl '' sᶜ ∪ Sum.inr '' tᶜ = (Sum.inl '' s ∪ Sum.inr '' t)ᶜ := by
rw [compl_union]
aesop
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
theorem diff_nonempty {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
theorem diff_subset_diff_iff_subset {r : Set α} (hs : s ⊆ r) (ht : t ⊆ r) :
r \ s ⊆ r \ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le hs ht
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
theorem diff_inter_diff : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
theorem compl_diff : (t \ s)ᶜ = s ∪ tᶜ :=
Eq.trans compl_sdiff himp_eq
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
theorem inter_diff_right_comm : (s ∩ t) \ u = s \ u ∩ t := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
theorem diff_inter_right_comm : (s \ u) ∩ t = (s ∩ t) \ u := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
/-! ### Powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := @h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := @h
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : Set α) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem powerset_inter (s t : Set α) : 𝒫(s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext fun _ => subset_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => @h _ (fun _ h => h), fun h _ hu _ ha => h (hu ha)⟩
theorem monotone_powerset : Monotone (powerset : Set α → Set (Set α)) := fun _ _ => powerset_mono.2
@[simp]
theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).Nonempty :=
⟨∅, fun _ h => empty_subset s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫(∅ : Set α) = {∅} :=
ext fun _ => subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫(univ : Set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
/-! ### Sets defined as an if-then-else -/
@[deprecated _root_.mem_dite (since := "2025-01-30")]
protected theorem mem_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) (t : ¬ p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h : p, x ∈ s h) ∧ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h :=
_root_.mem_dite
theorem mem_dite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else univ) ↔ ∀ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp [mem_dite]
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t Set.univ ↔ p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_right p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then univ else t h) ↔ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p Set.univ t ↔ ¬p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_left p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else ∅) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, not_not]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1 h.2⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun _ => h₂, h₁⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t ∅ ↔ p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_right p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
theorem mem_dite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then ∅ else t h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2 h.1⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun h => h₁ h, fun _ => h₂⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p ∅ t ↔ ¬p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_left p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
/-! ### If-then-else for sets -/
/-- `ite` for sets: `Set.ite t s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t`, `Set.ite t s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ`.
Defined as `s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t`. -/
protected def ite (t s s' : Set α) : Set α :=
s ∩ t ∪ s' \ t
@[simp]
theorem ite_inter_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ t = s ∩ t := by
rw [Set.ite, union_inter_distrib_right, diff_inter_self, inter_assoc, inter_self, union_empty]
@[simp]
theorem ite_compl (t s s' : Set α) : tᶜ.ite s s' = t.ite s' s := by
rw [Set.ite, Set.ite, diff_compl, union_comm, diff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem ite_inter_compl_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ∩ tᶜ = s' ∩ tᶜ := by
rw [← ite_compl, ite_inter_self]
@[simp]
theorem ite_diff_self (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' \ t = s' \ t :=
ite_inter_compl_self t s s'
@[simp]
theorem ite_same (t s : Set α) : t.ite s s = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[simp]
theorem ite_left (s t : Set α) : s.ite s t = s ∪ t := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_right (s t : Set α) : s.ite t s = t ∩ s := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty (s s' : Set α) : Set.ite ∅ s s' = s' := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_univ (s s' : Set α) : Set.ite univ s s' = s := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty_left (t s : Set α) : t.ite ∅ s = s \ t := by simp [Set.ite]
@[simp]
theorem ite_empty_right (t s : Set α) : t.ite s ∅ = s ∩ t := by simp [Set.ite]
theorem ite_mono (t : Set α) {s₁ s₁' s₂ s₂' : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h' : s₁' ⊆ s₂') :
t.ite s₁ s₁' ⊆ t.ite s₂ s₂' :=
union_subset_union (inter_subset_inter_left _ h) (inter_subset_inter_left _ h')
theorem ite_subset_union (t s s' : Set α) : t.ite s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
union_subset_union inter_subset_left diff_subset
theorem inter_subset_ite (t s s' : Set α) : s ∩ s' ⊆ t.ite s s' :=
ite_same t (s ∩ s') ▸ ite_mono _ inter_subset_left inter_subset_right
theorem ite_inter_inter (t s₁ s₂ s₁' s₂' : Set α) :
t.ite (s₁ ∩ s₂) (s₁' ∩ s₂') = t.ite s₁ s₁' ∩ t.ite s₂ s₂' := by
ext x
simp only [Set.ite, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_union]
tauto
theorem ite_inter (t s₁ s₂ s : Set α) : t.ite (s₁ ∩ s) (s₂ ∩ s) = t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s := by
rw [ite_inter_inter, ite_same]
theorem ite_inter_of_inter_eq (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ s : Set α} (h : s₁ ∩ s = s₂ ∩ s) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ ∩ s = s₁ ∩ s := by rw [← ite_inter, ← h, ite_same]
theorem subset_ite {t s s' u : Set α} : u ⊆ t.ite s s' ↔ u ∩ t ⊆ s ∧ u \ t ⊆ s' := by
simp only [subset_def, ← forall_and]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite]
theorem ite_eq_of_subset_left (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ \ t) := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite, or_iff_right_of_imp (@h x)]
theorem ite_eq_of_subset_right (t : Set α) {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
t.ite s₁ s₂ = (s₁ ∩ t) ∪ s₂ := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [*, Set.ite, or_iff_left_of_imp (@h x)]
end Set
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
theorem Injective.nonempty_apply_iff {f : Set α → Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h2 : f ∅ = ∅)
{s : Set α} : (f s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ← h2, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, hf.ne_iff]
end Function
namespace Subsingleton
variable {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α]
theorem eq_univ_of_nonempty {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → s = univ := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
eq_univ_of_forall fun y => Subsingleton.elim x y ▸ hx
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem set_cases {p : Set α → Prop} (h0 : p ∅) (h1 : p univ) (s) : p s :=
(s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim fun h => h.symm ▸ h0) fun h => (eq_univ_of_nonempty h).symm ▸ h1
theorem mem_iff_nonempty {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} {x : α} : x ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun hx => ⟨x, hx⟩, fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => Subsingleton.elim y x ▸ hy⟩
end Subsingleton
/-! ### Decidability instances for sets -/
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} (s t : Set α) (a b : α)
instance decidableSdiff [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s \ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t))
instance decidableInter [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s ∩ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t))
instance decidableUnion [Decidable (a ∈ s)] [Decidable (a ∈ t)] : Decidable (a ∈ s ∪ t) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t))
instance decidableCompl [Decidable (a ∈ s)] : Decidable (a ∈ sᶜ) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∉ s))
instance decidableEmptyset : Decidable (a ∈ (∅ : Set α)) := Decidable.isFalse (by simp)
instance decidableUniv : Decidable (a ∈ univ) := Decidable.isTrue (by simp)
instance decidableInsert [Decidable (a = b)] [Decidable (a ∈ s)] : Decidable (a ∈ insert b s) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∨ _))
instance decidableSetOf (p : α → Prop) [Decidable (p a)] : Decidable (a ∈ { a | p a }) := by
assumption
end Set
variable {α : Type*} {s t u : Set α}
namespace Equiv
/-- Given a predicate `p : α → Prop`, produces an equivalence between
`Set {a : α // p a}` and `{s : Set α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a}`. -/
protected def setSubtypeComm (p : α → Prop) :
Set {a : α // p a} ≃ {s : Set α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a} where
toFun s := ⟨{a | ∃ h : p a, s ⟨a, h⟩}, fun _ h ↦ h.1⟩
invFun s := {a | a.val ∈ s.val}
left_inv s := by ext a; exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.2, fun h ↦ ⟨a.property, h⟩⟩
right_inv s := by ext; exact ⟨fun h ↦ h.2, fun h ↦ ⟨s.property _ h, h⟩⟩
@[simp]
protected lemma setSubtypeComm_apply (p : α → Prop) (s : Set {a // p a}) :
(Equiv.setSubtypeComm p) s = ⟨{a | ∃ h : p a, ⟨a, h⟩ ∈ s}, fun _ h ↦ h.1⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected lemma setSubtypeComm_symm_apply (p : α → Prop) (s : {s // ∀ a ∈ s, p a}) :
(Equiv.setSubtypeComm p).symm s = {a | a.val ∈ s.val} :=
rfl
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 2,307 | 2,307 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Thomas Read, Andrew Yang, Dagur Asgeirsson, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Mates
/-!
# Uniqueness of adjoints
This file shows that adjoints are unique up to natural isomorphism.
## Main results
* `Adjunction.leftAdjointUniq` : If `F` and `F'` are both left adjoint to `G`, then they are
naturally isomorphic.
* `Adjunction.rightAdjointUniq` : If `G` and `G'` are both right adjoint to `F`, then they are
naturally isomorphic.
-/
open CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace CategoryTheory.Adjunction
attribute [local simp] homEquiv_unit homEquiv_counit
/-- If `F` and `F'` are both left adjoint to `G`, then they are naturally isomorphic. -/
def leftAdjointUniq {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G) : F ≅ F' :=
((conjugateIsoEquiv adj1 adj2).symm (Iso.refl G)).symm
theorem homEquiv_leftAdjointUniq_hom_app {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G)
(x : C) : adj1.homEquiv _ _ ((leftAdjointUniq adj1 adj2).hom.app x) = adj2.unit.app x := by
simp [leftAdjointUniq]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_leftAdjointUniq_hom {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G) :
adj1.unit ≫ whiskerRight (leftAdjointUniq adj1 adj2).hom G = adj2.unit := by
ext x
rw [NatTrans.comp_app, ← homEquiv_leftAdjointUniq_hom_app adj1 adj2]
simp [← G.map_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_leftAdjointUniq_hom_app
{F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G) (x : C) :
adj1.unit.app x ≫ G.map ((leftAdjointUniq adj1 adj2).hom.app x) = adj2.unit.app x := by
rw [← unit_leftAdjointUniq_hom adj1 adj2]; rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftAdjointUniq_hom_counit {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G) :
whiskerLeft G (leftAdjointUniq adj1 adj2).hom ≫ adj2.counit = adj1.counit := by
ext x
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Functor.id_obj, leftAdjointUniq, Iso.symm_hom,
conjugateIsoEquiv_symm_apply_inv, Iso.refl_inv, NatTrans.comp_app, whiskerLeft_app,
conjugateEquiv_symm_apply_app, NatTrans.id_app, Functor.map_id, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
rw [← adj1.counit_naturality, ← Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftAdjointUniq_hom_app_counit {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G)
(x : D) :
(leftAdjointUniq adj1 adj2).hom.app (G.obj x) ≫ adj2.counit.app x = adj1.counit.app x := by
rw [← leftAdjointUniq_hom_counit adj1 adj2]
| rfl
theorem leftAdjointUniq_inv_app {F F' : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj1 : F ⊣ G) (adj2 : F' ⊣ G) (x : C) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Unique.lean | 68 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.OfFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.PiSystem
/-!
# The Caratheodory σ-algebra of an outer measure
Given an outer measure `m`, the Carathéodory-measurable sets are the sets `s` such that
for all sets `t` we have `m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. This forms a measurable space.
## Main definitions and statements
* `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.caratheodory` is the Carathéodory-measurable space
of an outer measure.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carath%C3%A9odory%27s_criterion>
## Tags
Carathéodory-measurable, Carathéodory's criterion
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
section CaratheodoryMeasurable
universe u
variable {α : Type u} (m : OuterMeasure α)
attribute [local simp] Set.inter_comm Set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_assoc
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α}
/-- A set `s` is Carathéodory-measurable for an outer measure `m` if for all sets `t` we have
`m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. -/
def IsCaratheodory (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)
theorem isCaratheodory_iff_le' {s : Set α} :
IsCaratheodory m s ↔ ∀ t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t :=
forall_congr' fun _ => le_antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_right <| measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem isCaratheodory_empty : IsCaratheodory m ∅ := by simp [IsCaratheodory, m.empty, diff_empty]
theorem isCaratheodory_compl : IsCaratheodory m s₁ → IsCaratheodory m s₁ᶜ := by
simp [IsCaratheodory, diff_eq, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isCaratheodory_compl_iff : IsCaratheodory m sᶜ ↔ IsCaratheodory m s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using isCaratheodory_compl m h, isCaratheodory_compl m⟩
theorem isCaratheodory_union (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) (h₂ : IsCaratheodory m s₂) :
IsCaratheodory m (s₁ ∪ s₂) := fun t => by
rw [h₁ t, h₂ (t ∩ s₁), h₂ (t \ s₁), h₁ (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)), inter_diff_assoc _ _ s₁,
Set.inter_assoc _ _ s₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_left,
union_diff_left, h₂ (t ∩ s₁)]
simp [diff_eq, add_assoc]
variable {m} in
lemma IsCaratheodory.biUnion_of_finite {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ t, m.IsCaratheodory (s i)) :
m.IsCaratheodory (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) := by
classical
lift t to Finset ι using ht
induction t using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i t hi IH =>
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_insert, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left] at h ⊢
exact m.isCaratheodory_union (h _ <| Or.inl rfl) (IH fun _ hj ↦ h _ <| Or.inr hj)
theorem measure_inter_union (h : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅) (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) {t : Set α} :
m (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)) = m (t ∩ s₁) + m (t ∩ s₂) := by
rw [h₁, Set.inter_assoc, Set.union_inter_cancel_left, inter_diff_assoc, union_diff_cancel_left h]
theorem isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt {s : ℕ → Set α} :
∀ {n : ℕ}, (∀ i < n, IsCaratheodory m (s i)) → IsCaratheodory m (⋃ i < n, s i)
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1, h => by
rw [biUnion_lt_succ]
exact isCaratheodory_union m
(isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt fun i hi => h i <| lt_of_lt_of_le hi <| Nat.le_succ _)
(h n (le_refl (n + 1)))
theorem isCaratheodory_inter (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) (h₂ : IsCaratheodory m s₂) :
IsCaratheodory m (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isCaratheodory_compl_iff, Set.compl_inter]
exact isCaratheodory_union _ (isCaratheodory_compl _ h₁) (isCaratheodory_compl _ h₂)
lemma isCaratheodory_diff (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) (h₂ : IsCaratheodory m s₂) :
IsCaratheodory m (s₁ \ s₂) := m.isCaratheodory_inter h₁ (m.isCaratheodory_compl h₂)
lemma isCaratheodory_partialSups {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, m.IsCaratheodory (s i)) (i : ι) :
m.IsCaratheodory (partialSups s i) := by
simpa only [partialSups_apply, Finset.sup'_eq_sup, Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion, ← Finset.mem_coe,
Finset.coe_Iic] using .biUnion_of_finite (finite_Iic _) (fun j _ ↦ h j)
lemma isCaratheodory_disjointed {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, m.IsCaratheodory (s i)) (i : ι) :
m.IsCaratheodory (disjointed s i) :=
disjointedRec (fun _ j ht ↦ m.isCaratheodory_diff ht <| h j) (h i)
theorem isCaratheodory_sum {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, IsCaratheodory m (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) {t : Set α} :
∀ {n}, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, m (t ∩ s i)) = m (t ∩ ⋃ i < n, s i)
| 0 => by simp [Nat.not_lt_zero, m.empty]
| Nat.succ n => by
rw [biUnion_lt_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ, Set.union_comm, isCaratheodory_sum h hd,
m.measure_inter_union _ (h n), add_comm]
intro a
simpa using fun (h₁ : a ∈ s n) i (hi : i < n) h₂ => (hd (ne_of_gt hi)).le_bot ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
/-- Use `isCaratheodory_iUnion` instead, which does not require the disjoint assumption. -/
theorem isCaratheodory_iUnion_of_disjoint {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, IsCaratheodory m (s i))
| (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : IsCaratheodory m (⋃ i, s i) := by
apply (isCaratheodory_iff_le' m).mpr
intro t
have hp : m (t ∩ ⋃ i, s i) ≤ ⨆ n, m (t ∩ ⋃ i < n, s i) := by
convert measure_iUnion_le (μ := m) fun i => t ∩ s i using 1
· simp [inter_iUnion]
· simp [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, isCaratheodory_sum m h hd]
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right hp _) ?_
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Caratheodory.lean | 131 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, Doga Can Sertbas
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Schnirelmann density
We define the Schnirelmann density of a set `A` of natural numbers as
$inf_{n > 0} |A ∩ {1,...,n}| / n$. As this density is very sensitive to changes in small values,
we must exclude `0` from the infimum, and from the intersection.
## Main statements
* Simple bounds on the Schnirelmann density, that it is between 0 and 1 are given in
`schnirelmannDensity_nonneg` and `schnirelmannDensity_le_one`.
* `schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem`: If `k ∉ A`, the density can be easily upper-bounded by
`1 - k⁻¹`
## Implementation notes
Despite the definition being noncomputable, we include a decidable instance argument, since this
makes the definition easier to use in explicit cases.
Further, we use `Finset.Ioc` rather than a set intersection since the set is finite by construction,
which reduces the proof obligations later that would arise with `Nat.card`.
## TODO
* Give other calculations of the density, for example powers and their sumsets.
* Define other densities like the lower and upper asymptotic density, and the natural density,
and show how these relate to the Schnirelmann density.
* Show that if the sum of two densities is at least one, the sumset covers the positive naturals.
* Prove Schnirelmann's theorem and Mann's theorem on the subadditivity of this density.
## References
* [Ruzsa, Imre, *Sumsets and structure*][ruzsa2009]
-/
open Finset
/-- The Schnirelmann density is defined as the infimum of |A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n as n ranges over
the positive naturals. -/
noncomputable def schnirelmannDensity (A : Set ℕ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] : ℝ :=
⨅ n : {n : ℕ // 0 < n}, #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n
section
variable {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_nonneg : 0 ≤ schnirelmannDensity A :=
Real.iInf_nonneg (fun _ => by positivity)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_div {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩ (⟨n, hn.bot_lt⟩ : {n : ℕ // 0 < n})
/--
For any natural `n`, the Schnirelmann density multiplied by `n` is bounded by `|A ∩ {1, ..., n}|`.
Note this property fails for the natural density.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_mul_le_card_filter {n : ℕ} :
schnirelmannDensity A * n ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
exact (le_div_iff₀ (by positivity)).1 (schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn)
/--
To show the Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `x`, it suffices to show
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n ≤ x`, for any chosen positive value of `n`.
We provide `n` explicitly here to make this lemma more easily usable in `apply` or `refine`.
This lemma is analogous to `ciInf_le_of_le`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hx : #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n ≤ x) : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x :=
(schnirelmannDensity_le_div hn).trans hx
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_one : schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 :=
schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le 1 one_ne_zero <|
by rw [Nat.cast_one, div_one, Nat.cast_le_one]; exact card_filter_le _ _
/--
If `k` is omitted from the set, its Schnirelmann density is upper bounded by `1 - k⁻¹`.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem {k : ℕ} (hk : k ∉ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ 1 - (k⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases k.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hk'
· simpa using schnirelmannDensity_le_one
apply schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le k hk'.ne'
rw [← one_div, one_sub_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hk').ne']
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pred hk', Nat.cast_le]
suffices {a ∈ Ioc 0 k | a ∈ A} ⊆ Ioo 0 k from (card_le_card this).trans_eq (by simp)
rw [← Ioo_insert_right hk', filter_insert, if_neg hk]
exact filter_subset _ _
/-- The Schnirelmann density of a set not containing `1` is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (h : 1 ∉ A) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 :=
((schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem h).trans (by simp)).antisymm schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
/-- The Schnirelmann density is increasing with the set. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_of_subset {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A ⊆ B) :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ schnirelmannDensity B :=
ciInf_mono ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ by positivity⟩ fun _ ↦ by
gcongr; exact h
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` is `1` if and only if `A` contains all the positive naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff : schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ {0}ᶜ ⊆ A := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_right schnirelmannDensity_le_one]
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not, not_le]
simp only [Set.not_subset, forall_exists_index, true_and, and_imp, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
intro x hx hx'
apply (schnirelmannDensity_le_of_not_mem hx').trans_lt
simpa only [one_div, sub_lt_self_iff, inv_pos, Nat.cast_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero] using hx
· intro h
refine le_ciInf fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => ?_
rw [one_le_div (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), Nat.cast_le, filter_true_of_mem, Nat.card_Ioc, Nat.sub_zero]
rintro x hx
exact h (mem_Ioc.1 hx).1.ne'
/-- The Schnirelmann density of `A` containing `0` is `1` if and only if `A` is the naturals. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (hA : 0 ∈ A) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 1 ↔ A = Set.univ := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· refine fun h => Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· exact hA
· exact h hx
· rintro rfl
exact Set.subset_univ {0}ᶜ
lemma le_schnirelmannDensity_iff {x : ℝ} :
x ≤ schnirelmannDensity A ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ≤ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n :=
(le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx ▸ by positivity⟩).trans Subtype.forall
lemma schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A < x ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x := by
rw [← not_le, le_schnirelmannDensity_iff]; simp
lemma schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall {x : ℝ} :
schnirelmannDensity A ≤ x ↔
∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < x + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_lt_iff]
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr' {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)]
(h : ∀ n > 0, n ∈ A ↔ n ∈ B) : schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B := by
rw [schnirelmannDensity, schnirelmannDensity]; congr; ext ⟨n, hn⟩; congr 3; ext x; aesop
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by adding `0`. -/
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_insert_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ insert 0 A)] :
schnirelmannDensity (insert 0 A) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/-- The Schnirelmann density is unaffected by removing `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_diff_singleton_zero [DecidablePred (· ∈ A \ {0})] :
schnirelmannDensity (A \ {0}) = schnirelmannDensity A :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_congr {B : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ B)] (h : A = B) :
schnirelmannDensity A = schnirelmannDensity B :=
schnirelmannDensity_congr' (by aesop)
/--
If the Schnirelmann density is `0`, there is a positive natural for which
`|A ∩ {1, ..., n}| / n < ε`, for any positive `ε`.
Note this cannot be improved to `∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop`, as can be seen by `A = {1}ᶜ`.
-/
lemma exists_of_schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (hA : schnirelmannDensity A = 0) :
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ #{a ∈ Ioc 0 n | a ∈ A} / n < ε := by
by_contra! h
rw [← le_schnirelmannDensity_iff] at h
linarith
end
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_empty : schnirelmannDensity ∅ = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem (by simp)
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finset is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finset (A : Finset ℕ) : schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ schnirelmannDensity_nonneg
simp only [schnirelmannDensity_le_iff_forall, zero_add]
intro ε hε
wlog hε₁ : ε ≤ 1 generalizing ε
· obtain ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ := this 1 zero_lt_one le_rfl
exact ⟨n, hn, hn'.trans_le (le_of_not_le hε₁)⟩
let n : ℕ := ⌊#A / ε⌋₊ + 1
have hn : 0 < n := Nat.succ_pos _
use n, hn
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), ← div_lt_iff₀' hε, Nat.cast_add_one]
exact (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).trans_le' <| by gcongr; simp [subset_iff]
/-- The Schnirelmann density of any finite set is `0`. -/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_finite {A : Set ℕ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ A)] (hA : A.Finite) :
schnirelmannDensity A = 0 := by simpa using schnirelmannDensity_finset hA.toFinset
@[simp] lemma schnirelmannDensity_univ : schnirelmannDensity Set.univ = 1 :=
(schnirelmannDensity_eq_one_iff_of_zero_mem (by simp)).2 (by simp)
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_even : schnirelmannDensity (setOf Even) = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem <| by simp
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_prime : schnirelmannDensity (setOf Nat.Prime) = 0 :=
schnirelmannDensity_eq_zero_of_one_not_mem <| by simp [Nat.not_prime_one]
/--
The Schnirelmann density of the set of naturals which are `1 mod m` is `m⁻¹`, for any `m ≠ 1`.
Note that if `m = 1`, this set is empty.
-/
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_mod_eq_one {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 1) :
schnirelmannDensity {n | n % m = 1} = (m⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with rfl | hm'
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, inv_zero]
refine schnirelmannDensity_finite ?_
simp
apply le_antisymm (schnirelmannDensity_le_of_le m hm'.ne' _) _
· rw [← one_div, ← @Nat.cast_one ℝ]
gcongr
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton, subset_iff,
mem_filter, mem_Ioc, mem_singleton, and_imp]
use 1
intro x _ hxm h
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxm with rfl | hxm'
· simp at h
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hxm'] at h
rw [le_schnirelmannDensity_iff]
intro n hn
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
have : (Icc 0 ((n - 1) / m)).image (· * m + 1) ⊆ {x ∈ Ioc 0 n | x % m = 1} := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_image, forall_exists_index, mem_filter, mem_Ioc, mem_Icc, and_imp]
rintro _ y _ hy' rfl
have hm : 2 ≤ m := hm.lt_of_le' hm'
simp only [Nat.mul_add_mod', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hm, add_pos_iff, or_true, and_true, true_and,
← Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le hn, zero_lt_one]
exact Nat.mul_le_of_le_div _ _ _ hy'
rw [le_div_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn), mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
apply (Nat.cast_le.2 (card_le_card this)).trans'
rw [card_image_of_injective, Nat.card_Icc, Nat.sub_zero, div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 hm'),
← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_one_mul (α := ℕ)]
· have := @Nat.lt_div_mul_add n.pred m hm'
rwa [← Nat.succ_le, Nat.succ_pred hn.ne'] at this
intro a b
simp [hm'.ne']
lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_modeq_one {m : ℕ} :
schnirelmannDensity {n | n ≡ 1 [MOD m]} = (m⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with rfl | hm
· simp [Nat.modEq_one]
rw [← schnirelmannDensity_setOf_mod_eq_one hm]
apply schnirelmannDensity_congr
ext n
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Nat.ModEq, Nat.one_mod_eq_one.mpr hm]
| lemma schnirelmannDensity_setOf_Odd : schnirelmannDensity (setOf Odd) = 2⁻¹ := by
have h : setOf Odd = {n | n % 2 = 1} := Set.ext fun _ => Nat.odd_iff
simp only [h]
rw [schnirelmannDensity_setOf_mod_eq_one (by norm_num1), Nat.cast_two]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Schnirelmann.lean | 264 | 267 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# Real quadratic forms
Sylvester's law of inertia `equivalent_one_neg_one_weighted_sum_squared`:
A real quadratic form is equivalent to a weighted
sum of squares with the weights being ±1 or 0.
When the real quadratic form is nondegenerate we can take the weights to be ±1,
as in `QuadraticForm.equivalent_one_zero_neg_one_weighted_sum_squared`.
-/
namespace QuadraticForm
open Finset SignType
open QuadraticMap
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The isometry between a weighted sum of squares with weights `u` on the
(non-zero) real numbers and the weighted sum of squares with weights `sign ∘ u`. -/
noncomputable def isometryEquivSignWeightedSumSquares (w : ι → ℝ) :
IsometryEquiv (weightedSumSquares ℝ w)
(weightedSumSquares ℝ (fun i ↦ (sign (w i) : ℝ))) := by
let u i := if h : w i = 0 then (1 : ℝˣ) else Units.mk0 (w i) h
have hu : ∀ i : ι, 1 / √|(u i : ℝ)| ≠ 0 := fun i ↦
have : (u i : ℝ) ≠ 0 := (u i).ne_zero
by positivity
have hwu : ∀ i, w i / |(u i : ℝ)| = sign (w i) := fun i ↦ by
by_cases hi : w i = 0 <;> field_simp [hi, u]
convert QuadraticMap.isometryEquivBasisRepr (weightedSumSquares ℝ w)
((Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).unitsSMul fun i => .mk0 _ (hu i))
ext1 v
classical
suffices ∑ i, (w i / |(u i : ℝ)|) * v i ^ 2 = ∑ i, w i * (v i ^ 2 * |(u i : ℝ)|⁻¹) by
simpa [basisRepr_apply, Basis.unitsSMul_apply, ← _root_.sq, mul_pow, ← hwu, Pi.single_apply]
exact sum_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ by ring
/-- **Sylvester's law of inertia**: A nondegenerate real quadratic form is equivalent to a weighted
sum of squares with the weights being ±1, `SignType` version. -/
theorem equivalent_sign_ne_zero_weighted_sum_squared {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module ℝ M]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ M] (Q : QuadraticForm ℝ M) (hQ : (associated (R := ℝ) Q).SeparatingLeft) :
∃ w : Fin (Module.finrank ℝ M) → SignType,
(∀ i, w i ≠ 0) ∧ Equivalent Q (weightedSumSquares ℝ fun i ↦ (w i : ℝ)) :=
let ⟨w, ⟨hw₁⟩⟩ := Q.equivalent_weightedSumSquares_units_of_nondegenerate' hQ
⟨sign ∘ ((↑) : ℝˣ → ℝ) ∘ w, fun i => sign_ne_zero.2 (w i).ne_zero,
⟨hw₁.trans (isometryEquivSignWeightedSumSquares (((↑) : ℝˣ → ℝ) ∘ w))⟩⟩
/-- **Sylvester's law of inertia**: A nondegenerate real quadratic form is equivalent to a weighted
sum of squares with the weights being ±1. -/
theorem equivalent_one_neg_one_weighted_sum_squared {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module ℝ M]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ M] (Q : QuadraticForm ℝ M) (hQ : (associated (R := ℝ) Q).SeparatingLeft) :
| ∃ w : Fin (Module.finrank ℝ M) → ℝ,
(∀ i, w i = -1 ∨ w i = 1) ∧ Equivalent Q (weightedSumSquares ℝ w) :=
let ⟨w, hw₀, hw⟩ := Q.equivalent_sign_ne_zero_weighted_sum_squared hQ
⟨(w ·), fun i ↦ by cases hi : w i <;> simp_all, hw⟩
/-- **Sylvester's law of inertia**: A real quadratic form is equivalent to a weighted
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Real.lean | 65 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
| f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
protected theorem Involutive.preimage {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) : Involutive (preimage f) :=
hf.rightInverse.preimage_preimage
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,135 | 1,139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
|
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 820 | 821 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Util.Notation3
/-!
# Quotient types
This module extends the core library's treatment of quotient types (`Init.Core`).
## Tags
quotient
-/
variable {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*}
namespace Setoid
-- Pretty print `@Setoid.r _ s a b` as `s a b`.
run_cmd Lean.Elab.Command.liftTermElabM do
Lean.Meta.registerCoercion ``Setoid.r
(some { numArgs := 2, coercee := 1, type := .coeFun })
/-- When writing a lemma about `someSetoid x y` (which uses this instance),
call it `someSetoid_apply` not `someSetoid_r`. -/
instance : CoeFun (Setoid α) (fun _ ↦ α → α → Prop) where
coe := @Setoid.r _
theorem ext {α : Sort*} : ∀ {s t : Setoid α}, (∀ a b, s a b ↔ t a b) → s = t
| ⟨r, _⟩, ⟨p, _⟩, Eq =>
by have : r = p := funext fun a ↦ funext fun b ↦ propext <| Eq a b
subst this
rfl
end Setoid
namespace Quot
variable {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop} {φ : Quot ra → Quot rb → Sort*}
@[inherit_doc Quot.mk]
local notation3:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => Quot.mk _ a
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Sort*} {r : α → α → Prop} {β : Quot r → Prop} (q : Quot r)
(h : ∀ a, β (Quot.mk r a)) : β q :=
ind h q
instance (r : α → α → Prop) [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Quot r) :=
⟨⟦default⟧⟩
protected instance Subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (Quot ra) :=
⟨fun x ↦ Quot.induction_on x fun _ ↦ Quot.ind fun _ ↦ congr_arg _ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
instance [Unique α] : Unique (Quot ra) := Unique.mk' _
/-- Recursion on two `Quotient` arguments `a` and `b`, result type depends on `⟦a⟧` and `⟦b⟧`. -/
protected def hrecOn₂ (qa : Quot ra) (qb : Quot rb) (f : ∀ a b, φ ⟦a⟧ ⟦b⟧)
(ca : ∀ {b a₁ a₂}, ra a₁ a₂ → HEq (f a₁ b) (f a₂ b))
(cb : ∀ {a b₁ b₂}, rb b₁ b₂ → HEq (f a b₁) (f a b₂)) :
φ qa qb :=
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun qa ↦ φ qa qb) qa
(fun a ↦ Quot.hrecOn qb (f a) (fun _ _ pb ↦ cb pb))
fun a₁ a₂ pa ↦
Quot.induction_on qb fun b ↦
have h₁ : HEq (@Quot.hrecOn _ _ (φ _) ⟦b⟧ (f a₁) (@cb _)) (f a₁ b) := by
simp [heq_self_iff_true]
have h₂ : HEq (f a₂ b) (@Quot.hrecOn _ _ (φ _) ⟦b⟧ (f a₂) (@cb _)) := by
simp [heq_self_iff_true]
(h₁.trans (ca pa)).trans h₂
/-- Map a function `f : α → β` such that `ra x y` implies `rb (f x) (f y)`
to a map `Quot ra → Quot rb`. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (h : ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, ra a b → rb (f a) (f b)) : Quot ra → Quot rb :=
Quot.lift (fun x => Quot.mk rb (f x)) fun _ _ hra ↦ Quot.sound <| h hra
/-- If `ra` is a subrelation of `ra'`, then we have a natural map `Quot ra → Quot ra'`. -/
protected def mapRight {ra' : α → α → Prop} (h : ∀ a₁ a₂, ra a₁ a₂ → ra' a₁ a₂) :
Quot ra → Quot ra' :=
Quot.map id h
/-- Weaken the relation of a quotient. This is the same as `Quot.map id`. -/
def factor {α : Type*} (r s : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) : Quot r → Quot s :=
Quot.lift (Quot.mk s) fun x y rxy ↦ Quot.sound (h x y rxy)
theorem factor_mk_eq {α : Type*} (r s : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
factor r s h ∘ Quot.mk _ = Quot.mk _ :=
rfl
variable {γ : Sort*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
theorem lift_mk (f : α → γ) (h : ∀ a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂) (a : α) :
Quot.lift f h (Quot.mk r a) = f a :=
rfl
theorem liftOn_mk (a : α) (f : α → γ) (h : ∀ a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂) :
Quot.liftOn (Quot.mk r a) f h = f a :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem surjective_lift {f : α → γ} (h : ∀ a₁ a₂, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ = f a₂) :
Function.Surjective (lift f h) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun hf => hf.comp Quot.exists_rep, fun hf y => let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y; ⟨Quot.mk _ x, hx⟩⟩
/-- Descends a function `f : α → β → γ` to quotients of `α` and `β`. -/
protected def lift₂ (f : α → β → γ) (hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂)
(hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b) (q₁ : Quot r) (q₂ : Quot s) : γ :=
Quot.lift (fun a ↦ Quot.lift (f a) (hr a))
(fun a₁ a₂ ha ↦ funext fun q ↦ Quot.induction_on q fun b ↦ hs a₁ a₂ b ha) q₁ q₂
@[simp]
theorem lift₂_mk (f : α → β → γ) (hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂)
(hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b)
(a : α) (b : β) : Quot.lift₂ f hr hs (Quot.mk r a) (Quot.mk s b) = f a b :=
rfl
/-- Descends a function `f : α → β → γ` to quotients of `α` and `β` and applies it. -/
protected def liftOn₂ (p : Quot r) (q : Quot s) (f : α → β → γ)
(hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂) (hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b) : γ :=
Quot.lift₂ f hr hs p q
@[simp]
theorem liftOn₂_mk (a : α) (b : β) (f : α → β → γ) (hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂)
(hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b) :
Quot.liftOn₂ (Quot.mk r a) (Quot.mk s b) f hr hs = f a b :=
rfl
variable {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-- Descends a function `f : α → β → γ` to quotients of `α` and `β` with values in a quotient of
`γ`. -/
protected def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → t (f a b₁) (f a b₂))
(hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → t (f a₁ b) (f a₂ b)) (q₁ : Quot r) (q₂ : Quot s) : Quot t :=
Quot.lift₂ (fun a b ↦ Quot.mk t <| f a b) (fun a b₁ b₂ hb ↦ Quot.sound (hr a b₁ b₂ hb))
(fun a₁ a₂ b ha ↦ Quot.sound (hs a₁ a₂ b ha)) q₁ q₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk (f : α → β → γ) (hr : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → t (f a b₁) (f a b₂))
(hs : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → t (f a₁ b) (f a₂ b)) (a : α) (b : β) :
Quot.map₂ f hr hs (Quot.mk r a) (Quot.mk s b) = Quot.mk t (f a b) :=
rfl
/-- A binary version of `Quot.recOnSubsingleton`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def recOnSubsingleton₂ {φ : Quot r → Quot s → Sort*}
[h : ∀ a b, Subsingleton (φ ⟦a⟧ ⟦b⟧)] (q₁ : Quot r)
(q₂ : Quot s) (f : ∀ a b, φ ⟦a⟧ ⟦b⟧) : φ q₁ q₂ :=
@Quot.recOnSubsingleton _ r (fun q ↦ φ q q₂)
(fun a ↦ Quot.ind (β := fun b ↦ Subsingleton (φ (mk r a) b)) (h a) q₂) q₁
fun a ↦ Quot.recOnSubsingleton q₂ fun b ↦ f a b
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on₂ {δ : Quot r → Quot s → Prop} (q₁ : Quot r) (q₂ : Quot s)
(h : ∀ a b, δ (Quot.mk r a) (Quot.mk s b)) : δ q₁ q₂ :=
Quot.ind (β := fun a ↦ δ a q₂) (fun a₁ ↦ Quot.ind (fun a₂ ↦ h a₁ a₂) q₂) q₁
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on₃ {δ : Quot r → Quot s → Quot t → Prop} (q₁ : Quot r)
(q₂ : Quot s) (q₃ : Quot t) (h : ∀ a b c, δ (Quot.mk r a) (Quot.mk s b) (Quot.mk t c)) :
δ q₁ q₂ q₃ :=
Quot.ind (β := fun a ↦ δ a q₂ q₃) (fun a₁ ↦ Quot.ind (β := fun b ↦ δ _ b q₃)
(fun a₂ ↦ Quot.ind (fun a₃ ↦ h a₁ a₂ a₃) q₃) q₂) q₁
instance lift.decidablePred (r : α → α → Prop) (f : α → Prop) (h : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b)
[hf : DecidablePred f] :
DecidablePred (Quot.lift f h) :=
fun q ↦ Quot.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun _ ↦ Decidable _) q hf
/-- Note that this provides `DecidableRel (Quot.Lift₂ f ha hb)` when `α = β`. -/
instance lift₂.decidablePred (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β → Prop)
(ha : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂) (hb : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b)
[hf : ∀ a, DecidablePred (f a)] (q₁ : Quot r) :
DecidablePred (Quot.lift₂ f ha hb q₁) :=
fun q₂ ↦ Quot.recOnSubsingleton₂ q₁ q₂ hf
instance (r : α → α → Prop) (q : Quot r) (f : α → Prop) (h : ∀ a b, r a b → f a = f b)
[DecidablePred f] :
Decidable (Quot.liftOn q f h) :=
Quot.lift.decidablePred _ _ _ _
instance (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) (q₁ : Quot r) (q₂ : Quot s) (f : α → β → Prop)
(ha : ∀ a b₁ b₂, s b₁ b₂ → f a b₁ = f a b₂) (hb : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, r a₁ a₂ → f a₁ b = f a₂ b)
[∀ a, DecidablePred (f a)] :
Decidable (Quot.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ f ha hb) :=
Quot.lift₂.decidablePred _ _ _ _ _ _ _
end Quot
namespace Quotient
variable {sa : Setoid α} {sb : Setoid β}
variable {φ : Quotient sa → Quotient sb → Sort*}
-- TODO: in mathlib3 this notation took the Setoid as an instance-implicit argument,
-- now it's explicit but left as a metavariable.
-- We have not yet decided which one works best, since the setoid instance can't always be
-- reliably found but it can't always be inferred from the expected type either.
-- See also: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/confusion.20between.20equivalence.20and.20instance.20setoid/near/360822354
@[inherit_doc Quotient.mk]
notation3:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => Quotient.mk _ a
instance instInhabitedQuotient (s : Setoid α) [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Quotient s) :=
⟨⟦default⟧⟩
instance instSubsingletonQuotient (s : Setoid α) [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (Quotient s) :=
Quot.Subsingleton
instance instUniqueQuotient (s : Setoid α) [Unique α] : Unique (Quotient s) := Unique.mk' _
instance {α : Type*} [Setoid α] : IsEquiv α (· ≈ ·) where
refl := Setoid.refl
symm _ _ := Setoid.symm
trans _ _ _ := Setoid.trans
/-- Induction on two `Quotient` arguments `a` and `b`, result type depends on `⟦a⟧` and `⟦b⟧`. -/
protected def hrecOn₂ (qa : Quotient sa) (qb : Quotient sb) (f : ∀ a b, φ ⟦a⟧ ⟦b⟧)
(c : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → HEq (f a₁ b₁) (f a₂ b₂)) : φ qa qb :=
Quot.hrecOn₂ qa qb f (fun p ↦ c _ _ _ _ p (Setoid.refl _)) fun p ↦ c _ _ _ _ (Setoid.refl _) p
/-- Map a function `f : α → β` that sends equivalent elements to equivalent elements
to a function `Quotient sa → Quotient sb`. Useful to define unary operations on quotients. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (h : ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≈ b → f a ≈ f b) : Quotient sa → Quotient sb :=
Quot.map f h
@[simp]
theorem map_mk (f : α → β) (h) (x : α) :
Quotient.map f h (⟦x⟧ : Quotient sa) = (⟦f x⟧ : Quotient sb) :=
rfl
variable {γ : Sort*} {sc : Setoid γ}
/-- Map a function `f : α → β → γ` that sends equivalent elements to equivalent elements
to a function `f : Quotient sa → Quotient sb → Quotient sc`.
Useful to define binary operations on quotients. -/
protected def map₂ (f : α → β → γ)
(h : ∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, a₁ ≈ a₂ → ∀ ⦃b₁ b₂⦄, b₁ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ ≈ f a₂ b₂) :
Quotient sa → Quotient sb → Quotient sc :=
Quotient.lift₂ (fun x y ↦ ⟦f x y⟧) fun _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ Quot.sound <| h h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk (f : α → β → γ) (h) (x : α) (y : β) :
Quotient.map₂ f h (⟦x⟧ : Quotient sa) (⟦y⟧ : Quotient sb) = (⟦f x y⟧ : Quotient sc) :=
rfl
instance lift.decidablePred (f : α → Prop) (h : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) [DecidablePred f] :
DecidablePred (Quotient.lift f h) :=
Quot.lift.decidablePred _ _ _
/-- Note that this provides `DecidableRel (Quotient.lift₂ f h)` when `α = β`. -/
instance lift₂.decidablePred (f : α → β → Prop)
(h : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂)
[hf : ∀ a, DecidablePred (f a)]
(q₁ : Quotient sa) : DecidablePred (Quotient.lift₂ f h q₁) :=
fun q₂ ↦ Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ q₁ q₂ hf
instance (q : Quotient sa) (f : α → Prop) (h : ∀ a b, a ≈ b → f a = f b) [DecidablePred f] :
Decidable (Quotient.liftOn q f h) :=
Quotient.lift.decidablePred _ _ _
instance (q₁ : Quotient sa) (q₂ : Quotient sb) (f : α → β → Prop)
(h : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) [∀ a, DecidablePred (f a)] :
Decidable (Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ f h) :=
Quotient.lift₂.decidablePred _ _ _ _
end Quotient
theorem Quot.eq {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {x y : α} :
Quot.mk r x = Quot.mk r y ↔ Relation.EqvGen r x y :=
⟨Quot.eqvGen_exact, Quot.eqvGen_sound⟩
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.eq {r : Setoid α} {x y : α} : Quotient.mk r x = ⟦y⟧ ↔ r x y :=
⟨Quotient.exact, Quotient.sound⟩
theorem Quotient.eq_iff_equiv {r : Setoid α} {x y : α} : Quotient.mk r x = ⟦y⟧ ↔ x ≈ y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem Quotient.forall {α : Sort*} {s : Setoid α} {p : Quotient s → Prop} :
(∀ a, p a) ↔ ∀ a : α, p ⟦a⟧ :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ h _, fun h a ↦ a.ind h⟩
theorem Quotient.exists {α : Sort*} {s : Setoid α} {p : Quotient s → Prop} :
(∃ a, p a) ↔ ∃ a : α, p ⟦a⟧ :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ ↦ q.ind (motive := (p · → _)) .intro hq, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨⟦a⟧, ha⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.lift_mk {s : Setoid α} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ a b : α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) (x : α) :
Quotient.lift f h (Quotient.mk s x) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.lift_comp_mk {_ : Setoid α} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ a b : α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Quotient.lift f h ∘ Quotient.mk _ = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.lift_surjective_iff {α β : Sort*} {s : Setoid α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ (a b : α), a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
Function.Surjective (Quotient.lift f h : Quotient s → β) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
Quot.surjective_lift h
theorem Quotient.lift_surjective {α β : Sort*} {s : Setoid α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ (a b : α), a ≈ b → f a = f b) (hf : Function.Surjective f):
Function.Surjective (Quotient.lift f h : Quotient s → β) :=
(Quot.surjective_lift h).mpr hf
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.lift₂_mk {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} {γ : Sort*} {_ : Setoid α} {_ : Setoid β}
(f : α → β → γ)
(h : ∀ (a₁ : α) (a₂ : β) (b₁ : α) (b₂ : β), a₁ ≈ b₁ → a₂ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ a₂ = f b₁ b₂)
(a : α) (b : β) :
Quotient.lift₂ f h (Quotient.mk _ a) (Quotient.mk _ b) = f a b :=
rfl
theorem Quotient.liftOn_mk {s : Setoid α} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ a b : α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) (x : α) :
Quotient.liftOn (Quotient.mk s x) f h = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.liftOn₂_mk {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} {_ : Setoid α} (f : α → α → β)
(h : ∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α, a₁ ≈ b₁ → a₂ ≈ b₂ → f a₁ a₂ = f b₁ b₂) (x y : α) :
Quotient.liftOn₂ (Quotient.mk _ x) (Quotient.mk _ y) f h = f x y :=
rfl
/-- `Quot.mk r` is a surjective function. -/
theorem Quot.mk_surjective {r : α → α → Prop} : Function.Surjective (Quot.mk r) :=
Quot.exists_rep
/-- `Quotient.mk` is a surjective function. -/
theorem Quotient.mk_surjective {s : Setoid α} :
Function.Surjective (Quotient.mk s) :=
Quot.exists_rep
/-- `Quotient.mk'` is a surjective function. -/
theorem Quotient.mk'_surjective [s : Setoid α] :
Function.Surjective (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) :=
Quot.exists_rep
/-- Choose an element of the equivalence class using the axiom of choice.
Sound but noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def Quot.out {r : α → α → Prop} (q : Quot r) : α :=
Classical.choose (Quot.exists_rep q)
/-- Unwrap the VM representation of a quotient to obtain an element of the equivalence class.
Computable but unsound. -/
unsafe def Quot.unquot {r : α → α → Prop} : Quot r → α :=
cast lcProof
@[simp]
theorem Quot.out_eq {r : α → α → Prop} (q : Quot r) : Quot.mk r q.out = q :=
Classical.choose_spec (Quot.exists_rep q)
/-- Choose an element of the equivalence class using the axiom of choice.
Sound but noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def Quotient.out {s : Setoid α} : Quotient s → α :=
Quot.out
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.out_eq {s : Setoid α} (q : Quotient s) : ⟦q.out⟧ = q :=
Quot.out_eq q
theorem Quotient.mk_out {s : Setoid α} (a : α) : s (⟦a⟧ : Quotient s).out a :=
Quotient.exact (Quotient.out_eq _)
theorem Quotient.mk_eq_iff_out {s : Setoid α} {x : α} {y : Quotient s} :
⟦x⟧ = y ↔ x ≈ Quotient.out y := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ Quotient.eq
rw [Quotient.out_eq y]
theorem Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out {s : Setoid α} {x : Quotient s} {y : α} :
x = ⟦y⟧ ↔ Quotient.out x ≈ y := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ Quotient.eq
rw [Quotient.out_eq x]
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.out_equiv_out {s : Setoid α} {x y : Quotient s} : x.out ≈ y.out ↔ x = y := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out, Quotient.out_eq]
theorem Quotient.out_injective {s : Setoid α} : Function.Injective (@Quotient.out α s) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ Quotient.out_equiv_out.1 <| h ▸ Setoid.refl _
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.out_inj {s : Setoid α} {x y : Quotient s} : x.out = y.out ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ Quotient.out_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
section Pi
instance piSetoid {ι : Sort*} {α : ι → Sort*} [∀ i, Setoid (α i)] : Setoid (∀ i, α i) where
r a b := ∀ i, a i ≈ b i
iseqv := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ Setoid.refl _,
fun h _ ↦ Setoid.symm (h _),
fun h₁ h₂ _ ↦ Setoid.trans (h₁ _) (h₂ _)⟩
/-- Given a class of functions `q : @Quotient (∀ i, α i) _`, returns the class of `i`-th projection
`Quotient (S i)`. -/
def Quotient.eval {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Sort*} {S : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)}
(q : @Quotient (∀ i, α i) (by infer_instance)) (i : ι) : Quotient (S i) :=
q.map (· i) fun _ _ h ↦ by exact h i
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.eval_mk {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {S : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)} (f : ∀ i, α i) :
Quotient.eval (S := S) ⟦f⟧ = fun i ↦ ⟦f i⟧ :=
rfl
/-- Given a function `f : Π i, Quotient (S i)`, returns the class of functions `Π i, α i` sending
each `i` to an element of the class `f i`. -/
noncomputable def Quotient.choice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {S : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)}
(f : ∀ i, Quotient (S i)) :
@Quotient (∀ i, α i) (by infer_instance) :=
⟦fun i ↦ (f i).out⟧
@[simp]
theorem Quotient.choice_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {S : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)} (f : ∀ i, α i) :
(Quotient.choice (S := S) fun i ↦ ⟦f i⟧) = ⟦f⟧ :=
Quotient.sound fun _ ↦ Quotient.mk_out _
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Quotient.induction_on_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Sort*} {s : ∀ i, Setoid (α i)}
{p : (∀ i, Quotient (s i)) → Prop} (f : ∀ i, Quotient (s i))
(h : ∀ a : ∀ i, α i, p fun i ↦ ⟦a i⟧) : p f := by
rw [← (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.out_eq (f i) : (fun i ↦ ⟦(f i).out⟧) = f)]
apply h
end Pi
theorem nonempty_quotient_iff (s : Setoid α) : Nonempty (Quotient s) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ Quotient.inductionOn a Nonempty.intro, fun ⟨a⟩ ↦ ⟨⟦a⟧⟩⟩
/-! ### Truncation -/
theorem true_equivalence : @Equivalence α fun _ _ ↦ True :=
⟨fun _ ↦ trivial, fun _ ↦ trivial, fun _ _ ↦ trivial⟩
/-- Always-true relation as a `Setoid`.
Note that in later files the preferred spelling is `⊤ : Setoid α`. -/
def trueSetoid : Setoid α :=
⟨_, true_equivalence⟩
/-- `Trunc α` is the quotient of `α` by the always-true relation. This
is related to the propositional truncation in HoTT, and is similar
in effect to `Nonempty α`, but unlike `Nonempty α`, `Trunc α` is data,
so the VM representation is the same as `α`, and so this can be used to
maintain computability. -/
def Trunc.{u} (α : Sort u) : Sort u :=
@Quotient α trueSetoid
namespace Trunc
/-- Constructor for `Trunc α` -/
def mk (a : α) : Trunc α :=
Quot.mk _ a
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Trunc α) :=
⟨mk default⟩
/-- Any constant function lifts to a function out of the truncation -/
def lift (f : α → β) (c : ∀ a b : α, f a = f b) : Trunc α → β :=
Quot.lift f fun a b _ ↦ c a b
theorem ind {β : Trunc α → Prop} : (∀ a : α, β (mk a)) → ∀ q : Trunc α, β q :=
Quot.ind
protected theorem lift_mk (f : α → β) (c) (a : α) : lift f c (mk a) = f a :=
rfl
/-- Lift a constant function on `q : Trunc α`. -/
protected def liftOn (q : Trunc α) (f : α → β) (c : ∀ a b : α, f a = f b) : β :=
lift f c q
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {β : Trunc α → Prop} (q : Trunc α) (h : ∀ a, β (mk a)) : β q :=
ind h q
theorem exists_rep (q : Trunc α) : ∃ a : α, mk a = q :=
Quot.exists_rep q
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on₂ {C : Trunc α → Trunc β → Prop} (q₁ : Trunc α) (q₂ : Trunc β)
(h : ∀ a b, C (mk a) (mk b)) : C q₁ q₂ :=
Trunc.induction_on q₁ fun a₁ ↦ Trunc.induction_on q₂ (h a₁)
protected theorem eq (a b : Trunc α) : a = b :=
Trunc.induction_on₂ a b fun _ _ ↦ Quot.sound trivial
instance instSubsingletonTrunc : Subsingleton (Trunc α) :=
⟨Trunc.eq⟩
/-- The `bind` operator for the `Trunc` monad. -/
def bind (q : Trunc α) (f : α → Trunc β) : Trunc β :=
Trunc.liftOn q f fun _ _ ↦ Trunc.eq _ _
/-- A function `f : α → β` defines a function `map f : Trunc α → Trunc β`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (q : Trunc α) : Trunc β :=
bind q (Trunc.mk ∘ f)
instance : Monad Trunc where
pure := @Trunc.mk
bind := @Trunc.bind
instance : LawfulMonad Trunc where
id_map _ := Trunc.eq _ _
pure_bind _ _ := rfl
bind_assoc _ _ _ := Trunc.eq _ _
map_const := rfl
seqLeft_eq _ _ := Trunc.eq _ _
seqRight_eq _ _ := Trunc.eq _ _
pure_seq _ _ := rfl
bind_pure_comp _ _ := rfl
bind_map _ _ := rfl
variable {C : Trunc α → Sort*}
/-- Recursion/induction principle for `Trunc`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec (f : ∀ a, C (mk a))
(h : ∀ a b : α, (Eq.ndrec (f a) (Trunc.eq (mk a) (mk b)) : C (mk b)) = f b)
(q : Trunc α) : C q :=
Quot.rec f (fun a b _ ↦ h a b) q
/-- A version of `Trunc.rec` taking `q : Trunc α` as the first argument. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def recOn (q : Trunc α) (f : ∀ a, C (mk a))
(h : ∀ a b : α, (Eq.ndrec (f a) (Trunc.eq (mk a) (mk b)) : C (mk b)) = f b) : C q :=
Trunc.rec f h q
/-- A version of `Trunc.recOn` assuming the codomain is a `Subsingleton`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def recOnSubsingleton [∀ a, Subsingleton (C (mk a))] (q : Trunc α) (f : ∀ a, C (mk a)) :
C q :=
Trunc.rec f (fun _ b ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ (f b)) q
/-- Noncomputably extract a representative of `Trunc α` (using the axiom of choice). -/
noncomputable def out : Trunc α → α :=
Quot.out
@[simp]
theorem out_eq (q : Trunc α) : mk q.out = q :=
Trunc.eq _ _
protected theorem nonempty (q : Trunc α) : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists q.exists_rep
end Trunc
/-! ### `Quotient` with implicit `Setoid` -/
namespace Quotient
variable {γ : Sort*} {φ : Sort*} {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid β} {s₃ : Setoid γ}
/-! Versions of quotient definitions and lemmas ending in `'` use unification instead
of typeclass inference for inferring the `Setoid` argument. This is useful when there are
several different quotient relations on a type, for example quotient groups, rings and modules. -/
-- TODO: this whole section can probably be replaced `Quotient.mk`, with explicit parameter
/-- A version of `Quotient.mk` taking `{s : Setoid α}` as an implicit argument instead of an
instance argument. -/
protected abbrev mk'' (a : α) : Quotient s₁ :=
⟦a⟧
/-- `Quotient.mk''` is a surjective function. -/
theorem mk''_surjective : Function.Surjective (Quotient.mk'' : α → Quotient s₁) :=
Quot.exists_rep
/-- A version of `Quotient.liftOn` taking `{s : Setoid α}` as an implicit argument instead of an
instance argument. -/
protected def liftOn' (q : Quotient s₁) (f : α → φ) (h : ∀ a b, s₁ a b → f a = f b) :
φ :=
Quotient.liftOn q f h
@[simp]
protected theorem liftOn'_mk'' (f : α → φ) (h) (x : α) :
Quotient.liftOn' (@Quotient.mk'' _ s₁ x) f h = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma surjective_liftOn' {f : α → φ} (h) :
Function.Surjective (fun x : Quotient s₁ ↦ x.liftOn' f h) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
Quot.surjective_lift _
/-- A version of `Quotient.liftOn₂` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid β}` as implicit arguments
instead of instance arguments. -/
protected def liftOn₂' (q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂) (f : α → β → γ)
(h : ∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, s₁ a₁ b₁ → s₂ a₂ b₂ → f a₁ a₂ = f b₁ b₂) : γ :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ f h
@[simp]
protected theorem liftOn₂'_mk'' (f : α → β → γ) (h) (a : α) (b : β) :
Quotient.liftOn₂' (@Quotient.mk'' _ s₁ a) (@Quotient.mk'' _ s₂ b) f h = f a b :=
rfl
/-- A version of `Quotient.ind` taking `{s : Setoid α}` as an implicit argument instead of an
instance argument. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind' {p : Quotient s₁ → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p (Quotient.mk'' a)) (q : Quotient s₁) :
p q :=
Quotient.ind h q
/-- A version of `Quotient.ind₂` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid β}` as implicit arguments
instead of instance arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind₂' {p : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a₁ a₂, p (Quotient.mk'' a₁) (Quotient.mk'' a₂))
(q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂) : p q₁ q₂ :=
Quotient.ind₂ h q₁ q₂
/-- A version of `Quotient.inductionOn` taking `{s : Setoid α}` as an implicit argument instead
of an instance argument. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn' {p : Quotient s₁ → Prop} (q : Quotient s₁)
(h : ∀ a, p (Quotient.mk'' a)) : p q :=
Quotient.inductionOn q h
/-- A version of `Quotient.inductionOn₂` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid β}` as implicit
arguments instead of instance arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn₂' {p : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Prop} (q₁ : Quotient s₁)
(q₂ : Quotient s₂)
(h : ∀ a₁ a₂, p (Quotient.mk'' a₁) (Quotient.mk'' a₂)) : p q₁ q₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q₁ q₂ h
/-- A version of `Quotient.inductionOn₃` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid β} {s₃ : Setoid γ}`
as implicit arguments instead of instance arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn₃' {p : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Quotient s₃ → Prop}
(q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂) (q₃ : Quotient s₃)
(h : ∀ a₁ a₂ a₃, p (Quotient.mk'' a₁) (Quotient.mk'' a₂) (Quotient.mk'' a₃)) :
p q₁ q₂ q₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ q₁ q₂ q₃ h
/-- A version of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α}` as an implicit argument
instead of an instance argument. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def recOnSubsingleton' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Sort*} [∀ a, Subsingleton (φ ⟦a⟧)]
(q : Quotient s₁)
(f : ∀ a, φ (Quotient.mk'' a)) : φ q :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton q f
/-- A version of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` taking `{s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid α}`
as implicit arguments instead of instance arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def recOnSubsingleton₂' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Sort*}
[∀ a b, Subsingleton (φ ⟦a⟧ ⟦b⟧)]
(q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂) (f : ∀ a₁ a₂, φ (Quotient.mk'' a₁) (Quotient.mk'' a₂)) :
φ q₁ q₂ :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ q₁ q₂ f
/-- Recursion on a `Quotient` argument `a`, result type depends on `⟦a⟧`. -/
protected def hrecOn' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Sort*} (qa : Quotient s₁) (f : ∀ a, φ (Quotient.mk'' a))
(c : ∀ a₁ a₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)) : φ qa :=
Quot.hrecOn qa f c
@[simp]
theorem hrecOn'_mk'' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, φ (Quotient.mk'' a))
(c : ∀ a₁ a₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂))
(x : α) : (Quotient.mk'' x).hrecOn' f c = f x :=
rfl
/-- Recursion on two `Quotient` arguments `a` and `b`, result type depends on `⟦a⟧` and `⟦b⟧`. -/
protected def hrecOn₂' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Sort*} (qa : Quotient s₁)
(qb : Quotient s₂) (f : ∀ a b, φ (Quotient.mk'' a) (Quotient.mk'' b))
(c : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → HEq (f a₁ b₁) (f a₂ b₂)) :
φ qa qb :=
Quotient.hrecOn₂ qa qb f c
@[simp]
theorem hrecOn₂'_mk'' {φ : Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ → Sort*}
(f : ∀ a b, φ (Quotient.mk'' a) (Quotient.mk'' b))
(c : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, a₁ ≈ a₂ → b₁ ≈ b₂ → HEq (f a₁ b₁) (f a₂ b₂)) (x : α) (qb : Quotient s₂) :
(Quotient.mk'' x).hrecOn₂' qb f c = qb.hrecOn' (f x) fun _ _ ↦ c _ _ _ _ (Setoid.refl _) :=
rfl
/-- Map a function `f : α → β` that sends equivalent elements to equivalent elements
to a function `Quotient sa → Quotient sb`. Useful to define unary operations on quotients. -/
protected def map' (f : α → β) (h : ∀ a b, s₁.r a b → s₂.r (f a) (f b)) :
Quotient s₁ → Quotient s₂ :=
Quot.map f h
@[simp]
theorem map'_mk'' (f : α → β) (h) (x : α) :
(Quotient.mk'' x : Quotient s₁).map' f h = (Quotient.mk'' (f x) : Quotient s₂) :=
rfl
/-- A version of `Quotient.map₂` using curly braces and unification. -/
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")] protected alias map₂' := Quotient.map₂
theorem exact' {a b : α} :
(Quotient.mk'' a : Quotient s₁) = Quotient.mk'' b → s₁ a b :=
Quotient.exact
theorem sound' {a b : α} : s₁ a b → @Quotient.mk'' α s₁ a = Quotient.mk'' b :=
Quotient.sound
@[simp]
protected theorem eq' {s₁ : Setoid α} {a b : α} :
@Quotient.mk' α s₁ a = @Quotient.mk' α s₁ b ↔ s₁ a b :=
Quotient.eq
protected theorem eq'' {a b : α} : @Quotient.mk'' α s₁ a = Quotient.mk'' b ↔ s₁ a b :=
Quotient.eq
theorem out_eq' (q : Quotient s₁) : Quotient.mk'' q.out = q :=
q.out_eq
theorem mk_out' (a : α) : s₁ (Quotient.mk'' a : Quotient s₁).out a :=
Quotient.exact (Quotient.out_eq _)
section
variable {s : Setoid α}
protected theorem mk''_eq_mk : Quotient.mk'' = Quotient.mk s :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem liftOn'_mk (x : α) (f : α → β) (h) : (Quotient.mk s x).liftOn' f h = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem liftOn₂'_mk {t : Setoid β} (f : α → β → γ) (h) (a : α) (b : β) :
Quotient.liftOn₂' (Quotient.mk s a) (Quotient.mk t b) f h = f a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂'_mk'' _ _ _ _
theorem map'_mk {t : Setoid β} (f : α → β) (h) (x : α) :
(Quotient.mk s x).map' f h = (Quotient.mk t (f x)) :=
rfl
end
instance (q : Quotient s₁) (f : α → Prop) (h : ∀ a b, s₁ a b → f a = f b)
[DecidablePred f] :
Decidable (Quotient.liftOn' q f h) :=
Quotient.lift.decidablePred _ _ q
instance (q₁ : Quotient s₁) (q₂ : Quotient s₂) (f : α → β → Prop)
(h : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, s₁ a₁ a₂ → s₂ b₁ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂)
[∀ a, DecidablePred (f a)] :
Decidable (Quotient.liftOn₂' q₁ q₂ f h) :=
Quotient.lift₂.decidablePred _ h _ _
end Quotient
@[simp]
lemma Equivalence.quot_mk_eq_iff {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} (h : Equivalence r) (x y : α) :
Quot.mk r x = Quot.mk r y ↔ r x y := by
constructor
· rw [Quot.eq]
intro hxy
induction hxy with
| rel _ _ H => exact H
| refl _ => exact h.refl _
| symm _ _ _ H => exact h.symm H
| trans _ _ _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ => exact h.trans h₁₂ h₂₃
· exact Quot.sound
| Mathlib/Data/Quot.lean | 847 | 858 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Multinomial
/-!
# Bounds on higher derivatives
`norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_le` gives the bound `n! * C * D ^ n` for the `n`-th derivative
of `g ∘ f` assuming that the derivatives of `g` are bounded by `C` and the `i`-th
derivative of `f` is bounded by `D ^ i`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat
universe u uD uE uF uG
open Set Fin Filter Function
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {D : Type uD} [NormedAddCommGroup D]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 D] {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{s s₁ t u : Set E}
/-!## Quantitative bounds -/
/-- Bounding the norm of the iterated derivative of `B (f x) (g x)` within a set in terms of the
iterated derivatives of `f` and `g` when `B` is bilinear. This lemma is an auxiliary version
assuming all spaces live in the same universe, to enable an induction. Use instead
`ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear` that removes this assumption. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_aux {Du Eu Fu Gu : Type u}
[NormedAddCommGroup Du] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Du] [NormedAddCommGroup Eu] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Eu]
[NormedAddCommGroup Fu] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fu] [NormedAddCommGroup Gu] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Gu]
(B : Eu →L[𝕜] Fu →L[𝕜] Gu) {f : Du → Eu} {g : Du → Fu} {n : ℕ} {s : Set Du} {x : Du}
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ := by
/- We argue by induction on `n`. The bound is trivial for `n = 0`. For `n + 1`, we write
the `(n+1)`-th derivative as the `n`-th derivative of the derivative `B f g' + B f' g`,
and apply the inductive assumption to each of those two terms. For this induction to make sense,
the spaces of linear maps that appear in the induction should be in the same universe as the
original spaces, which explains why we assume in the lemma that all spaces live in the same
universe. -/
induction' n with n IH generalizing Eu Fu Gu
· simp only [norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_zero, zero_add, Finset.range_one,
Finset.sum_singleton, Nat.choose_self, Nat.cast_one, one_mul, Nat.sub_zero, ← mul_assoc]
apply B.le_opNorm₂
· have In : (n : WithTop ℕ∞) + 1 ≤ n.succ := by simp only [Nat.cast_succ, le_refl]
-- Porting note: the next line is a hack allowing Lean to find the operator norm instance.
let norm := @ContinuousLinearMap.hasOpNorm _ _ Eu ((Du →L[𝕜] Fu) →L[𝕜] Du →L[𝕜] Gu) _ _ _ _ _ _
(RingHom.id 𝕜)
have I1 :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : Du => B.precompR Du (f y) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1 - i) g s x‖ := by
calc
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : Du => B.precompR Du (f y) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B.precompR Du‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s) s x‖ :=
IH _ (hf.of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (Nat.le_succ n))) (hg.fderivWithin hs In)
_ ≤ ‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s) s x‖ :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (B.norm_precompR_le Du) (by positivity)
_ = _ := by
congr 1
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [Nat.succ_sub (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 (Finset.mem_range.1 hi)),
← norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_fderivWithin hs hx]
-- Porting note: the next line is a hack allowing Lean to find the operator norm instance.
let norm := @ContinuousLinearMap.hasOpNorm _ _ (Du →L[𝕜] Eu) (Fu →L[𝕜] Du →L[𝕜] Gu) _ _ _ _ _ _
(RingHom.id 𝕜)
have I2 :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : Du => B.precompL Du (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) (g y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (i + 1) f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ :=
calc
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y : Du => B.precompL Du (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) (g y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B.precompL Du‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ :=
IH _ (hf.fderivWithin hs In) (hg.of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (Nat.le_succ n)))
_ ≤ ‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
n.choose i * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (B.norm_precompL_le Du) (by positivity)
_ = _ := by
congr 1
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [← norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_fderivWithin hs hx]
have J : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n
(fun y : Du => fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y : Du => B (f y) (g y)) s y) s x =
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => B.precompR Du (f y)
(fderivWithin 𝕜 g s y) + B.precompL Du (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) (g y)) s x := by
apply iteratedFDerivWithin_congr (fun y hy => ?_) hx
have L : (1 : WithTop ℕ∞) ≤ n.succ := by
simpa only [ENat.coe_one, Nat.one_le_cast] using Nat.succ_pos n
exact B.fderivWithin_of_bilinear (hf.differentiableOn L y hy) (hg.differentiableOn L y hy)
(hs y hy)
rw [← norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_fderivWithin hs hx, J]
have A : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => B.precompR Du (f y) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s y)) s :=
(B.precompR Du).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn
(hf.of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (Nat.le_succ n))) (hg.fderivWithin hs In)
have A' : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => B.precompL Du (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s y) (g y)) s :=
(B.precompL Du).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂_contDiffOn (hf.fderivWithin hs In)
(hg.of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (Nat.le_succ n)))
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_add_apply' (A.contDiffWithinAt hx) (A'.contDiffWithinAt hx) hs hx]
apply (norm_add_le _ _).trans ((add_le_add I1 I2).trans (le_of_eq ?_))
simp_rw [← mul_add, mul_assoc]
congr 1
exact (Finset.sum_choose_succ_mul
(fun i j => ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 j g s x‖) n).symm
/-- Bounding the norm of the iterated derivative of `B (f x) (g x)` within a set in terms of the
iterated derivatives of `f` and `g` when `B` is bilinear:
`‖D^n (x ↦ B (f x) (g x))‖ ≤ ‖B‖ ∑_{k ≤ n} n.choose k ‖D^k f‖ ‖D^{n-k} g‖` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear (B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G)
{f : D → E} {g : D → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} {s : Set D} {x : D} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N g s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) s x‖ ≤
‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ := by
/- We reduce the bound to the case where all spaces live in the same universe (in which we
already have proved the result), by using linear isometries between the spaces and their `ULift`
to a common universe. These linear isometries preserve the norm of the iterated derivative. -/
let Du : Type max uD uE uF uG := ULift.{max uE uF uG, uD} D
let Eu : Type max uD uE uF uG := ULift.{max uD uF uG, uE} E
let Fu : Type max uD uE uF uG := ULift.{max uD uE uG, uF} F
let Gu : Type max uD uE uF uG := ULift.{max uD uE uF, uG} G
have isoD : Du ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] D := LinearIsometryEquiv.ulift 𝕜 D
have isoE : Eu ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E := LinearIsometryEquiv.ulift 𝕜 E
have isoF : Fu ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F := LinearIsometryEquiv.ulift 𝕜 F
have isoG : Gu ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G := LinearIsometryEquiv.ulift 𝕜 G
-- lift `f` and `g` to versions `fu` and `gu` on the lifted spaces.
let fu : Du → Eu := isoE.symm ∘ f ∘ isoD
let gu : Du → Fu := isoF.symm ∘ g ∘ isoD
-- lift the bilinear map `B` to a bilinear map `Bu` on the lifted spaces.
let Bu₀ : Eu →L[𝕜] Fu →L[𝕜] G := ((B.comp (isoE : Eu →L[𝕜] E)).flip.comp (isoF : Fu →L[𝕜] F)).flip
let Bu : Eu →L[𝕜] Fu →L[𝕜] Gu :=
ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 Eu (Fu →L[𝕜] G) (Fu →L[𝕜] Gu)
(ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 Fu G Gu (isoG.symm : G →L[𝕜] Gu)) Bu₀
have hBu : Bu = ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 Eu (Fu →L[𝕜] G) (Fu →L[𝕜] Gu)
(ContinuousLinearMap.compL 𝕜 Fu G Gu (isoG.symm : G →L[𝕜] Gu)) Bu₀ := rfl
have Bu_eq : (fun y => Bu (fu y) (gu y)) = isoG.symm ∘ (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) ∘ isoD := by
ext1 y
simp [Du, Eu, Fu, Gu, hBu, Bu₀, fu, gu]
-- All norms are preserved by the lifting process.
have Bu_le : ‖Bu‖ ≤ ‖B‖ := by
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg B) fun y => ?_
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (by positivity) fun x => ?_
simp only [Du, Eu, Fu, Gu, hBu, Bu₀, compL_apply, coe_comp', Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_coe, flip_apply,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
calc
‖B (isoE y) (isoF x)‖ ≤ ‖B (isoE y)‖ * ‖isoF x‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ ‖B‖ * ‖isoE y‖ * ‖isoF x‖ := by gcongr; apply ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm
_ = ‖B‖ * ‖y‖ * ‖x‖ := by simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
let su := isoD ⁻¹' s
have hsu : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 su := isoD.toContinuousLinearEquiv.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs
let xu := isoD.symm x
have hxu : xu ∈ su := by
simpa only [xu, su, Set.mem_preimage, LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using hx
have xu_x : isoD xu = x := by simp only [xu, LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
have hfu : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n fu su :=
isoE.symm.contDiff.comp_contDiffOn
((hf.of_le hn).comp_continuousLinearMap (isoD : Du →L[𝕜] D))
have hgu : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n gu su :=
isoF.symm.contDiff.comp_contDiffOn
((hg.of_le hn).comp_continuousLinearMap (isoD : Du →L[𝕜] D))
have Nfu : ∀ i, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i fu su xu‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
intro i
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left _ _ hsu hxu]
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right _ _ hs, xu_x]
rwa [← xu_x] at hx
have Ngu : ∀ i, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i gu su xu‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i g s x‖ := by
intro i
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left _ _ hsu hxu]
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right _ _ hs, xu_x]
rwa [← xu_x] at hx
have NBu :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => Bu (fu y) (gu y)) su xu‖ =
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) s x‖ := by
rw [Bu_eq]
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left _ _ hsu hxu]
rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right _ _ hs, xu_x]
rwa [← xu_x] at hx
-- state the bound for the lifted objects, and deduce the original bound from it.
have : ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => Bu (fu y) (gu y)) su xu‖ ≤
‖Bu‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i fu su xu‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) gu su xu‖ :=
Bu.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_aux hfu hgu hsu hxu
simp only [Nfu, Ngu, NBu] at this
exact this.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right Bu_le (by positivity))
/-- Bounding the norm of the iterated derivative of `B (f x) (g x)` in terms of the
iterated derivatives of `f` and `g` when `B` is bilinear:
`‖D^n (x ↦ B (f x) (g x))‖ ≤ ‖B‖ ∑_{k ≤ n} n.choose k ‖D^k f‖ ‖D^{n-k} g‖` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear (B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) {f : D → E}
{g : D → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 N f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 N g) (x : D) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) x‖ ≤ ‖B‖ * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
(n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n - i) g x‖ := by
simp_rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact B.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear hf.contDiffOn hg.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ x) hn
/-- Bounding the norm of the iterated derivative of `B (f x) (g x)` within a set in terms of the
iterated derivatives of `f` and `g` when `B` is bilinear of norm at most `1`:
`‖D^n (x ↦ B (f x) (g x))‖ ≤ ∑_{k ≤ n} n.choose k ‖D^k f‖ ‖D^{n-k} g‖` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one
(B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) {f : D → E} {g : D → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} {s : Set D} {x : D}
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N f s) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N g s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {n : ℕ}
(hn : n ≤ N) (hB : ‖B‖ ≤ 1) : ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) s x‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ := by
apply (B.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear hf hg hs hx hn).trans
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left (by positivity) hB
/-- Bounding the norm of the iterated derivative of `B (f x) (g x)` in terms of the
iterated derivatives of `f` and `g` when `B` is bilinear of norm at most `1`:
`‖D^n (x ↦ B (f x) (g x))‖ ≤ ∑_{k ≤ n} n.choose k ‖D^k f‖ ‖D^{n-k} g‖` -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one (B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G)
{f : D → E} {g : D → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 N f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 N g)
(x : D) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (hB : ‖B‖ ≤ 1) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n (fun y => B (f y) (g y)) x‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
(n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n - i) g x‖ := by
simp_rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact B.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one hf.contDiffOn hg.contDiffOn
uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hn hB
section
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F]
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_smul_le {f : E → 𝕜'} {g : E → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N f s) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N g s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
{n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) : ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => f y • g y) s x‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul 𝕜 𝕜' :
𝕜' →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] F).norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one
hf hg hs hx hn ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_lsmul_le
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_smul_le {f : E → 𝕜'} {g : E → F} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 N f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 N g) (x : E) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n (fun y => f y • g y) x‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
(n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n - i) g x‖ :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul 𝕜 𝕜' : 𝕜' →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] F).norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one
hf hg x hn ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_lsmul_le
end
section
variable {ι : Type*} {A : Type*} [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A] {A' : Type*} [NormedCommRing A']
[NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A']
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_mul_le {f : E → A} {g : E → A} {N : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N f s) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 N g s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
{x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun y => f y * g y) s x‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ *
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n - i) g s x‖ :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 A :
A →L[𝕜] A →L[𝕜] A).norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one
hf hg hs hx hn (ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_mul_le _ _)
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_mul_le {f : E → A} {g : E → A} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 N f)
(hg : ContDiff 𝕜 N g) (x : E) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n (fun y => f y * g y) x‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
(n.choose i : ℝ) * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ * ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n - i) g x‖ := by
simp_rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_mul_le
hf.contDiffOn hg.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hn
-- TODO: Add `norm_iteratedFDeriv[Within]_list_prod_le` for non-commutative `NormedRing A`.
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_prod_le [DecidableEq ι] [NormOneClass A'] {u : Finset ι}
{f : ι → E → A'} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ u, ContDiffOn 𝕜 N (f i) s)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (∏ j ∈ u, f j ·) s x‖ ≤
∑ p ∈ u.sym n, (p : Multiset ι).multinomial *
∏ j ∈ u, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (Multiset.count j p) (f j) s x‖ := by
induction u using Finset.induction generalizing n with
| empty =>
cases n with
| zero => simp [Sym.eq_nil_of_card_zero]
| | succ n => simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const]
| insert i u hi IH =>
conv => lhs; simp only [Finset.prod_insert hi]
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp] at hf
refine le_trans (norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_mul_le hf.1 (contDiffOn_prod hf.2) hs hx hn) ?_
rw [← Finset.sum_coe_sort (Finset.sym _ _)]
rw [Finset.sum_equiv (Finset.symInsertEquiv hi) (t := Finset.univ)
(g := (fun v ↦ v.multinomial *
∏ j ∈ insert i u, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (v.count j) (f j) s x‖) ∘
Sym.toMultiset ∘ Subtype.val ∘ (Finset.symInsertEquiv hi).symm)
(by simp) (by simp only [← comp_apply (g := Finset.symInsertEquiv hi), comp_assoc]; simp)]
rw [← Finset.univ_sigma_univ, Finset.sum_sigma, Finset.sum_range]
simp only [comp_apply, Finset.symInsertEquiv_symm_apply_coe]
refine Finset.sum_le_sum ?_
intro m _
specialize IH hf.2 (n := n - m) (le_trans (by exact_mod_cast n.sub_le m) hn)
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left IH (by simp [mul_nonneg])) ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_coe_sort]
refine Finset.sum_le_sum ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall, Finset.mem_sym_iff]
intro p hp
refine le_of_eq ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hi]
have hip : i ∉ p := mt (hp i) hi
rw [Sym.count_coe_fill_self_of_not_mem hip, Sym.multinomial_coe_fill_of_not_mem hip]
suffices ∏ j ∈ u, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (Multiset.count j p) (f j) s x‖ =
∏ j ∈ u, ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (Multiset.count j (Sym.fill i m p)) (f j) s x‖ by
rw [this, Nat.cast_mul]
ring
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl ?_
intro j hj
have hji : j ≠ i := mt (· ▸ hj) hi
rw [Sym.count_coe_fill_of_ne hji]
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_prod_le [DecidableEq ι] [NormOneClass A'] {u : Finset ι}
{f : ι → E → A'} {N : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ u, ContDiff 𝕜 N (f i)) {x : E} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n ≤ N) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n (∏ j ∈ u, f j ·) x‖ ≤
∑ p ∈ u.sym n, (p : Multiset ι).multinomial *
∏ j ∈ u, ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 ((p : Multiset ι).count j) (f j) x‖ := by
simpa [iteratedFDerivWithin_univ] using
norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_prod_le (fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).contDiffOn) uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ x) hn
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Bounds.lean | 298 | 340 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
### Locally finite families of sets
We say that a family of sets in a topological space is *locally finite* if at every point `x : X`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family.
In this file we give the definition and prove basic properties of locally finite families of sets.
-/
-- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)]
open Set Function Filter Topology
variable {ι ι' α X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f g : ι → Set X}
/-- A family of sets in `Set X` is locally finite if at every point `x : X`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family. -/
def LocallyFinite (f : ι → Set X) :=
∀ x : X, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, { i | (f i ∩ t).Nonempty }.Finite
theorem locallyFinite_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) : LocallyFinite f := fun _ =>
⟨univ, univ_mem, toFinite _⟩
namespace LocallyFinite
theorem point_finite (hf : LocallyFinite f) (x : X) : { b | x ∈ f b }.Finite :=
let ⟨_t, hxt, ht⟩ := hf x
ht.subset fun _b hb => ⟨x, hb, mem_of_mem_nhds hxt⟩
protected theorem subset (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : ∀ i, g i ⊆ f i) : LocallyFinite g := fun a =>
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf a
⟨t, ht₁, ht₂.subset fun i hi => hi.mono <| inter_subset_inter (hg i) Subset.rfl⟩
theorem comp_injOn {g : ι' → ι} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : InjOn g { i | (f (g i)).Nonempty }) :
LocallyFinite (f ∘ g) := fun x => by
let ⟨t, htx, htf⟩ := hf x
refine ⟨t, htx, htf.preimage <| ?_⟩
exact hg.mono fun i (hi : Set.Nonempty _) => hi.left
theorem comp_injective {g : ι' → ι} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : Injective g) :
LocallyFinite (f ∘ g) :=
hf.comp_injOn hg.injOn
theorem _root_.locallyFinite_iff_smallSets :
LocallyFinite f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ s in (𝓝 x).smallSets, { i | (f i ∩ s).Nonempty }.Finite :=
forall_congr' fun _ => Iff.symm <|
eventually_smallSets' fun _s _t hst ht =>
ht.subset fun _i hi => hi.mono <| inter_subset_inter_right _ hst
protected theorem eventually_smallSets (hf : LocallyFinite f) (x : X) :
∀ᶠ s in (𝓝 x).smallSets, { i | (f i ∩ s).Nonempty }.Finite :=
locallyFinite_iff_smallSets.mp hf x
theorem exists_mem_basis {ι' : Sort*} (hf : LocallyFinite f) {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set X}
{x : X} (hb : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : ∃ i, p i ∧ { j | (f j ∩ s i).Nonempty }.Finite :=
let ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩ := hb.smallSets.eventually_iff.mp (hf.eventually_smallSets x)
⟨i, hpi, hi Subset.rfl⟩
protected theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion (hf : LocallyFinite f) (a : X) :
𝓝[⋃ i, f i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[f i] a := by
rcases hf a with ⟨U, haU, hfin⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Monotone.le_map_iSup fun _ _ ↦ nhdsWithin_mono _)
calc
𝓝[⋃ i, f i] a = 𝓝[⋃ i, f i ∩ U] a := by
rw [← iUnion_inter, ← nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds haU)]
_ = 𝓝[⋃ i ∈ {j | (f j ∩ U).Nonempty}, (f i ∩ U)] a := by
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iUnion_nonempty_self]
_ = ⨆ i ∈ {j | (f j ∩ U).Nonempty}, 𝓝[f i ∩ U] a := nhdsWithin_biUnion hfin _ _
_ ≤ ⨆ i, 𝓝[f i ∩ U] a := iSup₂_le_iSup _ _
_ ≤ ⨆ i, 𝓝[f i] a := iSup_mono fun i ↦ nhdsWithin_mono _ inter_subset_left
theorem continuousOn_iUnion' {g : X → Y} (hf : LocallyFinite f)
(hc : ∀ i x, x ∈ closure (f i) → ContinuousWithinAt g (f i) x) :
ContinuousOn g (⋃ i, f i) := by
rintro x -
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hf.nhdsWithin_iUnion, tendsto_iSup]
intro i
by_cases hx : x ∈ closure (f i)
· exact hc i _ hx
· rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [hx]
exact tendsto_bot
theorem continuousOn_iUnion {g : X → Y} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (h_cl : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i))
(h_cont : ∀ i, ContinuousOn g (f i)) : ContinuousOn g (⋃ i, f i) :=
hf.continuousOn_iUnion' fun i x hx ↦ h_cont i x <| (h_cl i).closure_subset hx
protected theorem continuous' {g : X → Y} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (h_cov : ⋃ i, f i = univ)
(hc : ∀ i x, x ∈ closure (f i) → ContinuousWithinAt g (f i) x) :
Continuous g :=
continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.2 <| h_cov ▸ hf.continuousOn_iUnion' hc
protected theorem continuous {g : X → Y} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (h_cov : ⋃ i, f i = univ)
(h_cl : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) (h_cont : ∀ i, ContinuousOn g (f i)) :
Continuous g :=
continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.2 <| h_cov ▸ hf.continuousOn_iUnion h_cl h_cont
protected theorem closure (hf : LocallyFinite f) : LocallyFinite fun i => closure (f i) := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨s, hsx, hsf⟩
refine ⟨interior s, interior_mem_nhds.2 hsx, hsf.subset fun i hi => ?_⟩
exact (hi.mono isOpen_interior.closure_inter).of_closure.mono
(inter_subset_inter_right _ interior_subset)
theorem closure_iUnion (h : LocallyFinite f) : closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, h.nhdsWithin_iUnion, iSup_neBot, mem_iUnion]
theorem isClosed_iUnion (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hc : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, f i) := by
simp only [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, hf.closure_iUnion, (hc _).closure_eq]
/-- If `f : β → Set α` is a locally finite family of closed sets, then for any `x : α`, the
intersection of the complements to `f i`, `x ∉ f i`, is a neighbourhood of `x`. -/
theorem iInter_compl_mem_nhds (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hc : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) (x : X) :
(⋂ (i) (_ : x ∉ f i), (f i)ᶜ) ∈ 𝓝 x := by
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ (mem_iInter₂.2 fun i => id)
suffices IsClosed (⋃ i : { i // x ∉ f i }, f i) by
rwa [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion, iInter_subtype] at this
exact (hf.comp_injective Subtype.val_injective).isClosed_iUnion fun i => hc _
/-- Let `f : ℕ → Π a, β a` be a sequence of (dependent) functions on a topological space. Suppose
that the family of sets `s n = {x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x}` is locally finite. Then there exists a
function `F : Π a, β a` such that for any `x`, we have `f n x = F x` on the product of an infinite
interval `[N, +∞)` and a neighbourhood of `x`.
We formulate the conclusion in terms of the product of filter `Filter.atTop` and `𝓝 x`. -/
theorem exists_forall_eventually_eq_prod {π : X → Sort*} {f : ℕ → ∀ x : X, π x}
(hf : LocallyFinite fun n => { x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x }) :
∃ F : ∀ x : X, π x, ∀ x, ∀ᶠ p : ℕ × X in atTop ×ˢ 𝓝 x, f p.1 p.2 = F p.2 := by
choose U hUx hU using hf
choose N hN using fun x => (hU x).bddAbove
replace hN : ∀ (x), ∀ n > N x, ∀ y ∈ U x, f (n + 1) y = f n y :=
fun x n hn y hy => by_contra fun hne => hn.lt.not_le <| hN x ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
replace hN : ∀ (x), ∀ n ≥ N x + 1, ∀ y ∈ U x, f n y = f (N x + 1) y :=
fun x n hn y hy => Nat.le_induction rfl (fun k hle => (hN x _ hle _ hy).trans) n hn
refine ⟨fun x => f (N x + 1) x, fun x => ?_⟩
filter_upwards [Filter.prod_mem_prod (eventually_gt_atTop (N x)) (hUx x)]
rintro ⟨n, y⟩ ⟨hn : N x < n, hy : y ∈ U x⟩
calc
f n y = f (N x + 1) y := hN _ _ hn _ hy
_ = f (max (N x + 1) (N y + 1)) y := (hN _ _ (le_max_left _ _) _ hy).symm
_ = f (N y + 1) y := hN _ _ (le_max_right _ _) _ (mem_of_mem_nhds <| hUx y)
/-- Let `f : ℕ → Π a, β a` be a sequence of (dependent) functions on a topological space. Suppose
that the family of sets `s n = {x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x}` is locally finite. Then there exists a
function `F : Π a, β a` such that for any `x`, for sufficiently large values of `n`, we have
| `f n y = F y` in a neighbourhood of `x`. -/
theorem exists_forall_eventually_atTop_eventually_eq' {π : X → Sort*} {f : ℕ → ∀ x : X, π x}
(hf : LocallyFinite fun n => { x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x }) :
∃ F : ∀ x : X, π x, ∀ x, ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ∀ᶠ y : X in 𝓝 x, f n y = F y :=
hf.exists_forall_eventually_eq_prod.imp fun _F hF x => (hF x).curry
/-- Let `f : ℕ → α → β` be a sequence of functions on a topological space. Suppose
that the family of sets `s n = {x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x}` is locally finite. Then there exists a
function `F : α → β` such that for any `x`, for sufficiently large values of `n`, we have
`f n =ᶠ[𝓝 x] F`. -/
theorem exists_forall_eventually_atTop_eventuallyEq {f : ℕ → X → α}
(hf : LocallyFinite fun n => { x | f (n + 1) x ≠ f n x }) :
∃ F : X → α, ∀ x, ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, f n =ᶠ[𝓝 x] F :=
hf.exists_forall_eventually_atTop_eventually_eq'
theorem preimage_continuous {g : Y → X} (hf : LocallyFinite f) (hg : Continuous g) :
| Mathlib/Topology/LocallyFinite.lean | 155 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Limits
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
/-!
# Properties of morphisms between Schemes
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms between Schemes.
A `MorphismProperty Scheme` is a predicate on morphisms between schemes. For properties local at
the target, its behaviour is entirely determined by its definition on morphisms into affine schemes,
which we call an `AffineTargetMorphismProperty`. In this file, we provide API lemmas for properties
local at the target, and special support for those properties whose `AffineTargetMorphismProperty`
takes on a more simple form. We also provide API lemmas for properties local at the target.
The main interfaces of the API are the typeclasses `IsLocalAtTarget`, `IsLocalAtSource` and
`HasAffineProperty`, which we describle in detail below.
## `IsLocalAtTarget`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget`: We say that `IsLocalAtTarget P` for
`P : MorphismProperty Scheme` if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for an open cover `U` of `Y` if and only if `P` holds for `f`.
For a morphism property `P` local at the target and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.of_isPullback`:
`P` is preserved under pullback along open immersions.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.restrict`:
`P f → P (f ∣_ U)` for an open `U` of `Y`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)` for a family `U i` of open sets covering `Y`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.pullbackHom f i)` for `𝒰 : Y.openCover`.
## `IsLocalAtSource`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtSource`: We say that `IsLocalAtSource P` for
`P : MorphismProperty Scheme` if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. `P` holds for `𝒰.map i ≫ f` for an open cover `𝒰` of `X` iff `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`.
For a morphism property `P` local at the source and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.comp`:
`P` is preserved under composition with open immersions at the source.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, P (U.ι ≫ f)` for a family `U i` of open sets covering `X`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.map i ≫ f)` for `𝒰 : X.openCover`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocalAtTarget.of_isOpenImmersion`: If `P` contains identities then `P` holds
for open immersions.
## `AffineTargetMorphismProperty`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty`:
The type of predicates on `f : X ⟶ Y` with `Y` affine.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal`: We say that `P.IsLocal` if `P`
satisfies the assumptions of the affine communication lemma
(`AlgebraicGeometry.of_affine_open_cover`). That is,
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. If `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `P` holds for `f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r` for any
global section `r`.
3. If `P` holds for `f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r` for all `r` in a spanning set of the global sections,
then `P` holds for `f`.
## `HasAffineProperty`
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty`:
`HasAffineProperty P Q` is a type class asserting that `P` is local at the target,
and over affine schemes, it is equivalent to `Q : AffineTargetMorphismProperty`.
For `HasAffineProperty P Q` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we provide these API lemmas:
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty.of_isPullback`:
`P` is preserved under pullback along open immersions from affine schemes.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty.restrict`:
`P f → Q (f ∣_ U)` for affine `U` of `Y`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty.iff_of_iSup_eq_top`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, Q (f ∣_ U i)` for a family `U i` of affine open sets covering `Y`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty.iff_of_openCover`:
`P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.pullbackHom f i)` for affine open covers `𝒰` of `Y`.
- `AlgebraicGeometry.HasAffineProperty.isStableUnderBaseChange_mk`:
If `Q` is stable under affine base change, then `P` is stable under arbitrary base change.
-/
universe u v
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/--
We say that `P : MorphismProperty Scheme` is local at the target if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for an open cover `U` of `Y` if and only if `P` holds for `f`.
Also see `IsLocalAtTarget.mk'` for a convenient constructor.
-/
class IsLocalAtTarget (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) : Prop where
/-- `P` respects isomorphisms. -/
respectsIso : P.RespectsIso := by infer_instance
/-- `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for an open cover `U` of `Y` if and only if `P` holds for `f`. -/
iff_of_openCover' :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y),
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.pullbackHom f i)
namespace IsLocalAtTarget
attribute [instance] respectsIso
/--
`P` is local at the target if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. If `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for any `U`.
3. If `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for an open cover `U` of `Y`, then `P` holds for `f`.
-/
protected lemma mk' {P : MorphismProperty Scheme} [P.RespectsIso]
(restrict : ∀ {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Y.Opens), P f → P (f ∣_ U))
(of_sSup_eq_top :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Y.Opens), iSup U = ⊤ →
(∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)) → P f) :
IsLocalAtTarget P := by
refine ⟨inferInstance, fun {X Y} f 𝒰 ↦ ⟨?_, fun H ↦ of_sSup_eq_top f _ 𝒰.iSup_opensRange ?_⟩⟩
· exact fun H i ↦ (P.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mp (restrict _ _ H)
· exact fun i ↦ (P.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mpr (H i)
/-- The intersection of two morphism properties that are local at the target is again local at
the target. -/
instance inf (P Q : MorphismProperty Scheme) [IsLocalAtTarget P] [IsLocalAtTarget Q] :
IsLocalAtTarget (P ⊓ Q) where
iff_of_openCover' {_ _} f 𝒰 :=
⟨fun h i ↦ ⟨(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mp h.left i, (iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mp h.right i⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mpr (fun i ↦ (h i).left),
(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mpr (fun i ↦ (h i).right)⟩⟩
variable {P} [hP : IsLocalAtTarget P] {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} (𝒰 : Y.OpenCover)
lemma of_isPullback {UX UY : Scheme.{u}} {iY : UY ⟶ Y} [IsOpenImmersion iY]
{iX : UX ⟶ X} {f' : UX ⟶ UY} (h : IsPullback iX f' f iY) (H : P f) : P f' := by
rw [← P.cancel_left_of_respectsIso h.isoPullback.inv, h.isoPullback_inv_snd]
exact (iff_of_openCover' f (Y.affineCover.add iY)).mp H .none
theorem restrict (hf : P f) (U : Y.Opens) : P (f ∣_ U) :=
of_isPullback (isPullback_morphismRestrict f U).flip hf
lemma of_iSup_eq_top {ι} (U : ι → Y.Opens) (hU : iSup U = ⊤)
(H : ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)) : P f := by
refine (IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_openCover' f
(Y.openCoverOfISupEqTop (s := Set.range U) Subtype.val (by ext; simp [← hU]))).mpr fun i ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ := i
refine (P.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mp ?_
show P (f ∣_ (U i).ι.opensRange)
rw [Scheme.Opens.opensRange_ι]
exact H i
theorem iff_of_iSup_eq_top {ι} (U : ι → Y.Opens) (hU : iSup U = ⊤) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i) :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ restrict H _, of_iSup_eq_top U hU⟩
lemma of_openCover (H : ∀ i, P (𝒰.pullbackHom f i)) : P f := by
apply of_iSup_eq_top (fun i ↦ (𝒰.map i).opensRange) 𝒰.iSup_opensRange
exact fun i ↦ (P.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mpr (H i)
theorem iff_of_openCover (𝒰 : Y.OpenCover) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.pullbackHom f i) :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ of_isPullback (.of_hasPullback _ _) H, of_openCover _⟩
lemma of_range_subset_iSup [P.RespectsRight @IsOpenImmersion] {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Y.Opens)
(H : Set.range f.base ⊆ (⨆ i, U i : Y.Opens)) (hf : ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)) : P f := by
let g : X ⟶ (⨆ i, U i : Y.Opens) := IsOpenImmersion.lift (Scheme.Opens.ι _) f (by simpa using H)
rw [← IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac (⨆ i, U i).ι f (by simpa using H)]
apply MorphismProperty.RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := @IsOpenImmersion) _ inferInstance
rw [IsLocalAtTarget.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (P := P) (U := fun i : ι ↦ (⨆ i, U i).ι ⁻¹ᵁ U i)]
· intro i
have heq : g ⁻¹ᵁ (⨆ i, U i).ι ⁻¹ᵁ U i = f ⁻¹ᵁ U i := by
show (g ≫ (⨆ i, U i).ι) ⁻¹ᵁ U i = _
simp [g]
let e : Arrow.mk (g ∣_ (⨆ i, U i).ι ⁻¹ᵁ U i) ≅ Arrow.mk (f ∣_ U i) :=
Arrow.isoMk (X.isoOfEq heq) (Scheme.Opens.isoOfLE (le_iSup U i)) <| by
simp [← CategoryTheory.cancel_mono (U i).ι, g]
rw [P.arrow_mk_iso_iff e]
exact hf i
apply (⨆ i, U i).ι.image_injective
dsimp
rw [Scheme.Hom.image_iSup, Scheme.Hom.image_top_eq_opensRange, Scheme.Opens.opensRange_ι]
simp [Scheme.Hom.image_preimage_eq_opensRange_inter, le_iSup U]
end IsLocalAtTarget
/--
We say that `P : MorphismProperty Scheme` is local at the source if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. `P` holds for `𝒰.map i ≫ f` for an open cover `𝒰` of `X` iff `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`.
Also see `IsLocalAtSource.mk'` for a convenient constructor.
-/
class IsLocalAtSource (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) : Prop where
/-- `P` respects isomorphisms. -/
respectsIso : P.RespectsIso := by infer_instance
/-- `P` holds for `f ∣_ U` for an open cover `U` of `Y` if and only if `P` holds for `f`. -/
iff_of_openCover' :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} X),
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.map i ≫ f)
namespace IsLocalAtSource
attribute [instance] respectsIso
/--
`P` is local at the source if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. If `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `P` holds for `U.ι ≫ f` for any `U`.
3. If `P` holds for `U.ι ≫ f` for an open cover `U` of `X`, then `P` holds for `f`.
-/
protected lemma mk' {P : MorphismProperty Scheme} [P.RespectsIso]
(restrict : ∀ {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : X.Opens), P f → P (U.ι ≫ f))
(of_sSup_eq_top :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type u} (U : ι → X.Opens), iSup U = ⊤ →
(∀ i, P ((U i).ι ≫ f)) → P f) :
IsLocalAtSource P := by
refine ⟨inferInstance, fun {X Y} f 𝒰 ↦
⟨fun H i ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ of_sSup_eq_top f _ 𝒰.iSup_opensRange fun i ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_hom_fac (𝒰.map i) (Scheme.Opens.ι _)
(congr_arg Opens.carrier (𝒰.map i).opensRange.opensRange_ι.symm), Category.assoc,
P.cancel_left_of_respectsIso]
exact restrict _ _ H
· rw [← IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac (𝒰.map i) (Scheme.Opens.ι _)
(congr_arg Opens.carrier (𝒰.map i).opensRange.opensRange_ι.symm), Category.assoc,
P.cancel_left_of_respectsIso]
exact H _
/-- The intersection of two morphism properties that are local at the target is again local at
the target. -/
instance inf (P Q : MorphismProperty Scheme) [IsLocalAtSource P] [IsLocalAtSource Q] :
IsLocalAtSource (P ⊓ Q) where
iff_of_openCover' {_ _} f 𝒰 :=
⟨fun h i ↦ ⟨(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mp h.left i, (iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mp h.right i⟩,
fun h ↦ ⟨(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mpr (fun i ↦ (h i).left),
(iff_of_openCover' f 𝒰).mpr (fun i ↦ (h i).right)⟩⟩
variable {P} [IsLocalAtSource P]
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {f : X ⟶ Y} (𝒰 : X.OpenCover)
lemma comp {UX : Scheme.{u}} (H : P f) (i : UX ⟶ X) [IsOpenImmersion i] :
P (i ≫ f) :=
(iff_of_openCover' f (X.affineCover.add i)).mp H .none
/-- If `P` is local at the source, then it respects composition on the left with open immersions. -/
instance respectsLeft_isOpenImmersion {P : MorphismProperty Scheme}
[IsLocalAtSource P] : P.RespectsLeft @IsOpenImmersion where
precomp i _ _ hf := IsLocalAtSource.comp hf i
lemma of_iSup_eq_top {ι} (U : ι → X.Opens) (hU : iSup U = ⊤)
(H : ∀ i, P ((U i).ι ≫ f)) : P f := by
refine (iff_of_openCover' f
(X.openCoverOfISupEqTop (s := Set.range U) Subtype.val (by ext; simp [← hU]))).mpr fun i ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ := i
exact H i
theorem iff_of_iSup_eq_top {ι} (U : ι → X.Opens) (hU : iSup U = ⊤) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P ((U i).ι ≫ f) :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ comp H _, of_iSup_eq_top U hU⟩
lemma of_openCover (H : ∀ i, P (𝒰.map i ≫ f)) : P f := by
refine of_iSup_eq_top (fun i ↦ (𝒰.map i).opensRange) 𝒰.iSup_opensRange fun i ↦ ?_
rw [← IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac (𝒰.map i) (Scheme.Opens.ι _)
(congr_arg Opens.carrier (𝒰.map i).opensRange.opensRange_ι.symm), Category.assoc,
P.cancel_left_of_respectsIso]
exact H i
theorem iff_of_openCover :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (𝒰.map i ≫ f) :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ comp H _, of_openCover _⟩
variable (f) in
lemma of_isOpenImmersion [P.ContainsIdentities] [IsOpenImmersion f] : P f :=
Category.comp_id f ▸ comp (P.id_mem Y) f
lemma isLocalAtTarget [P.IsMultiplicative]
(hP : ∀ {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsOpenImmersion g], P (f ≫ g) → P f) :
IsLocalAtTarget P where
iff_of_openCover' {X Y} f 𝒰 := by
refine (iff_of_openCover (𝒰.pullbackCover f)).trans (forall_congr' fun i ↦ ?_)
rw [← Scheme.Cover.pullbackHom_map]
constructor
· exact hP _ _
· exact fun H ↦ P.comp_mem _ _ H (of_isOpenImmersion _)
lemma sigmaDesc {X : Scheme.{u}} {ι : Type v} [Small.{u} ι] {Y : ι → Scheme.{u}}
{f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X} (hf : ∀ i, P (f i)) : P (Sigma.desc f) := by
rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_openCover (P := P) (sigmaOpenCover _)]
exact fun i ↦ by simp [hf]
section IsLocalAtSourceAndTarget
/-- If `P` is local at the source and the target, then restriction on both source and target
preserves `P`. -/
lemma resLE [IsLocalAtTarget P] {U : Y.Opens} {V : X.Opens} (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U)
(hf : P f) : P (f.resLE U V e) :=
IsLocalAtSource.comp (IsLocalAtTarget.restrict hf U) _
/-- If `P` is local at the source, local at the target and is stable under post-composition with
open immersions, then `P` can be checked locally around points. -/
lemma iff_exists_resLE [IsLocalAtTarget P] [P.RespectsRight @IsOpenImmersion] :
P f ↔ ∀ x : X, ∃ (U : Y.Opens) (V : X.Opens) (_ : x ∈ V.1) (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U),
P (f.resLE U V e) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x ↦ ⟨⊤, ⊤, trivial, by simp, resLE _ hf⟩, fun hf ↦ ?_⟩
choose U V hxU e hf using hf
rw [IsLocalAtSource.iff_of_iSup_eq_top (fun x : X ↦ V x) (P := P)]
· intro x
rw [← Scheme.Hom.resLE_comp_ι _ (e x)]
exact MorphismProperty.RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := @IsOpenImmersion) _ inferInstance _ (hf x)
· rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
simp only [Opens.coe_iSup, Set.mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe]
use x, hxU x
end IsLocalAtSourceAndTarget
end IsLocalAtSource
/-- An `AffineTargetMorphismProperty` is a class of morphisms from an arbitrary scheme into an
affine scheme. -/
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : Scheme⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y], Prop
namespace AffineTargetMorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext {P Q : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(H : ∀ ⦃X Y : Scheme⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y], P f ↔ Q f) : P = Q := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty; ext; exact H _
/-- The restriction of a `MorphismProperty Scheme` to morphisms with affine target. -/
def of (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) : AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
fun _ _ f _ ↦ P f
/-- An `AffineTargetMorphismProperty` can be extended to a `MorphismProperty` such that it
*never* holds when the target is not affine -/
def toProperty (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) :
MorphismProperty Scheme := fun _ _ f => ∃ h, @P _ _ f h
theorem toProperty_apply (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
{X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [i : IsAffine Y] : P.toProperty f ↔ P f := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty; simp [*]
theorem cancel_left_of_respectsIso
(P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) [P.toProperty.RespectsIso]
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsAffine Z] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P g := by
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, P.toProperty.cancel_left_of_respectsIso]
theorem cancel_right_of_respectsIso
(P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) [P.toProperty.RespectsIso]
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] [IsAffine Z] [IsAffine Y] :
P (f ≫ g) ↔ P f := by rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply,
P.toProperty.cancel_right_of_respectsIso]
theorem arrow_mk_iso_iff
(P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) [P.toProperty.RespectsIso]
{X Y X' Y' : Scheme} {f : X ⟶ Y} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk f') {h : IsAffine Y} :
letI : IsAffine Y' := .of_isIso (Y := Y) e.inv.right
P f ↔ P f' := by
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, P.toProperty.arrow_mk_iso_iff e]
theorem respectsIso_mk {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(h₁ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsAffine Z], P f → P (e.hom ≫ f))
(h₂ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : Y ≅ Z) (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y],
P f → @P _ _ (f ≫ e.hom) (.of_isIso e.inv)) :
P.toProperty.RespectsIso := by
apply MorphismProperty.RespectsIso.mk
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨a, h₁ e f h⟩
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨.of_isIso e.inv, h₂ e f h⟩
instance respectsIso_of
(P : MorphismProperty Scheme) [P.RespectsIso] :
(of P).toProperty.RespectsIso := by
apply respectsIso_mk
· intro _ _ _ _ _ _; apply MorphismProperty.RespectsIso.precomp
· intro _ _ _ _ _ _; apply MorphismProperty.RespectsIso.postcomp
/-- We say that `P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty` is a local property if
1. `P` respects isomorphisms.
2. If `P` holds for `f : X ⟶ Y`, then `P` holds for `f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r` for any
global section `r`.
3. If `P` holds for `f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r` for all `r` in a spanning set of the global sections,
then `P` holds for `f`.
-/
class IsLocal (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : Prop where
/-- `P` as a morphism property respects isomorphisms -/
respectsIso : P.toProperty.RespectsIso
/-- `P` is stable under restriction to basic open set of global sections. -/
to_basicOpen :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (r : Γ(Y, ⊤)), P f → P (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r)
/-- `P` for `f` if `P` holds for `f` restricted to basic sets of a spanning set of the global
sections -/
of_basicOpenCover :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (s : Finset Γ(Y, ⊤))
(_ : Ideal.span (s : Set Γ(Y, ⊤)) = ⊤), (∀ r : s, P (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r.1)) → P f
attribute [instance] AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.respectsIso
open AffineTargetMorphismProperty in
instance (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) [IsLocalAtTarget P] : (of P).IsLocal where
respectsIso := inferInstance
to_basicOpen _ _ H := IsLocalAtTarget.restrict H _
of_basicOpenCover {_ Y} _ _ _ hs := IsLocalAtTarget.of_iSup_eq_top _
(((isAffineOpen_top Y).basicOpen_union_eq_self_iff _).mpr hs)
/-- A `P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty` is stable under base change if `P` holds for `Y ⟶ S`
implies that `P` holds for `X ×ₛ Y ⟶ X` with `X` and `S` affine schemes. -/
def IsStableUnderBaseChange (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Z X Y S : Scheme⦄ [IsAffine S] [IsAffine X] {f : X ⟶ S} {g : Y ⟶ S}
{f' : Z ⟶ Y} {g' : Z ⟶ X}, IsPullback g' f' f g → P g → P g'
lemma IsStableUnderBaseChange.mk (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) [P.toProperty.RespectsIso]
(H : ∀ ⦃X Y S : Scheme⦄ [IsAffine S] [IsAffine X] (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S),
P g → P (pullback.fst f g)) : P.IsStableUnderBaseChange := by
intros Z X Y S _ _ f g f' g' h hg
| rw [← P.cancel_left_of_respectsIso h.isoPullback.inv, h.isoPullback_inv_fst]
exact H f g hg
end AffineTargetMorphismProperty
section targetAffineLocally
/-- For a `P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty`, `targetAffineLocally P` holds for
`f : X ⟶ Y` whenever `P` holds for the restriction of `f` on every affine open subset of `Y`. -/
def targetAffineLocally (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : MorphismProperty Scheme :=
fun {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) => ∀ U : Y.affineOpens, P (f ∣_ U)
theorem of_targetAffineLocally_of_isPullback
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/Basic.lean | 429 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We also define versions of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `AnalyticAt`, and `AnalyticOnNhd` restricted to
a set, similar to `ContinuousWithinAt`. See `Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within` for basic properties.
* `AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` means a power series at `x` converges to `f` on `𝓝[s ∪ {x}] x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s t` means `∀ x ∈ t, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal Set Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum
fun_prop
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => h.le_tsum' _
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
/-- `0` has infinite radius of convergence -/
@[simp] lemma zero_radius : (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F).radius = ∞ := by
rw [← constFormalMultilinearSeries_zero]
exact constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
rw [← div_lt_one this] at rt
refine ⟨_, rt, C, Or.inr zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
calc
|‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n| = ‖p n‖ * (t : ℝ) ^ n * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by
field_simp [mul_right_comm, abs_mul]
_ ≤ C * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by gcongr; apply hC
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = o(1)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
(fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (fun _ => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) :=
let ⟨_, ha, hp⟩ := p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h
hp.trans <| (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left ha.1.le ha.2).congr (fun _ => rfl) one_pow
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1` and `C > 0`, `‖p n‖ * r ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n`. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 5).mp
(p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h)
rcases this with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, H⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (H n)⟩
/-- If `r ≠ 0` and `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(aⁿ)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then `r < p.radius`. -/
theorem lt_radius_of_isBigO (h₀ : r ≠ 0) {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1)
(hp : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] (a ^ ·)) : ↑r < p.radius := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 2 5)
rcases this.mp ⟨a, ha, hp⟩ with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← NNReal.coe_pos] at h₀
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.1.le
have : (r : ℝ) < r / a := by
simpa only [div_one] using (div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left h₀ zero_lt_one ha.1).2 ha.2
norm_cast at this
rw [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at this
refine this.trans_le (p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => ?_)
rw [NNReal.coe_div, div_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, div_le_iff₀ (pow_pos ha.1 n)]
exact (le_abs_self _).trans (hp n)
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨_, ha, C, hC, h⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => (h n).trans <| mul_le_of_le_one_right hC.lt.le (pow_le_one₀ ha.1.le ha.2.le)⟩
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h0 : 0 < r) (h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C / (r : ℝ) ^ n :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => Iff.mpr (le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos h0 _)) (hp n)⟩
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨⟨C, hC.lt.le⟩, hC, mod_cast hp⟩
theorem le_radius_of_tendsto (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {l : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) atTop (𝓝 l)) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h.isBigO_one _)
theorem le_radius_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_tendsto hs.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem not_summable_norm_of_radius_lt_nnnorm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(h : p.radius < ‖x‖₊) : ¬Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * ‖x‖ ^ n :=
fun hs => not_le_of_lt h (p.le_radius_of_summable_norm hs)
theorem summable_norm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
exact .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg _))
hp ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _)
theorem summable_norm_apply (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n fun _ => x‖ := by
rw [mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff] at hx
refine .of_nonneg_of_le
(fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun n ↦ ((p n).le_opNorm _).trans_eq ?_) (p.summable_norm_mul_pow hx)
simp
theorem summable_nnnorm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe]
push_cast
exact p.summable_norm_mul_pow h
protected theorem summable [CompleteSpace F] (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => x :=
(p.summable_norm_apply hx).of_norm
theorem radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_summable_norm (hs r)
theorem radius_eq_top_iff_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
p.radius = ∞ ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro h r
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius
(show (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius from h.symm ▸ ENNReal.coe_lt_top)
refine .of_norm_bounded
(fun n ↦ (C : ℝ) * a ^ n) ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _) fun n ↦ ?_
specialize hp n
rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg n))]
· exact p.radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm
/-- If the radius of `p` is positive, then `‖pₙ‖` grows at most geometrically. -/
theorem le_mul_pow_of_radius_pos (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (h : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ (C r : _) (_ : 0 < C) (_ : 0 < r), ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 h with ⟨r, r0, rlt⟩
have rpos : 0 < (r : ℝ) := by simp [ENNReal.coe_pos.1 r0]
rcases norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius p rpos rlt with ⟨C, Cpos, hCp⟩
refine ⟨C, r⁻¹, Cpos, by simp only [inv_pos, rpos], fun n => ?_⟩
rw [inv_pow, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hCp n
lemma radius_le_of_le {𝕜' E' F' : Type*}
[NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' E']
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F']
{p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜' E' F'}
(h : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ ‖q n‖) : q.radius ≤ p.radius := by
apply le_of_forall_nnreal_lt (fun r hr ↦ ?_)
rcases norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius _ hr with ⟨C, -, hC⟩
apply le_radius_of_bound _ C (fun n ↦ ?_)
apply le_trans _ (hC n)
gcongr
exact h n
/-- The radius of the sum of two formal series is at least the minimum of their two radii. -/
theorem min_radius_le_radius_add (p q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
min p.radius q.radius ≤ (p + q).radius := by
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr => ?_
rw [lt_min_iff] at hr
have := ((p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr.1).add (q.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr.2)).isBigO
refine (p + q).le_radius_of_isBigO ((isBigO_of_le _ fun n => ?_).trans this)
rw [← add_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_norm]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((norm_add_le _ _).trans (le_abs_self _)) (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem radius_neg (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : (-p).radius = p.radius := by
simp only [radius, neg_apply, norm_neg]
theorem radius_le_smul {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {c : 𝕜} : p.radius ≤ (c • p).radius := by
simp only [radius, smul_apply]
refine iSup_mono fun r ↦ iSup_mono' fun C ↦ ⟨‖c‖ * C, iSup_mono' fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [le_refl, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
rw [norm_smul c (p n), mul_assoc]
gcongr
exact h n
theorem radius_smul_eq (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(c • p).radius = p.radius := by
apply eq_of_le_of_le _ radius_le_smul
exact radius_le_smul.trans_eq (congr_arg _ <| inv_smul_smul₀ hc p)
@[simp]
theorem radius_shift (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : p.shift.radius = p.radius := by
simp only [radius, shift, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryRight_norm]
congr
ext r
apply eq_of_le_of_le
· apply iSup_mono'
intro C
use ‖p 0‖ ⊔ (C * r)
apply iSup_mono'
intro h
simp only [le_refl, le_sup_iff, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
rcases n with - | m
· simp
right
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (h m) zero_le_coe
· apply iSup_mono'
intro C
use ‖p 1‖ ⊔ C / r
apply iSup_mono'
intro h
simp only [le_refl, le_sup_iff, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
cases eq_zero_or_pos r with
| inl hr =>
rw [hr]
cases n <;> simp
| inr hr =>
right
rw [← NNReal.coe_pos] at hr
specialize h (n + 1)
rw [le_div_iff₀ hr]
rwa [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc] at h
@[simp]
theorem radius_unshift (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E (E →L[𝕜] F)) (z : F) :
(p.unshift z).radius = p.radius := by
rw [← radius_shift, unshift_shift]
protected theorem hasSum [CompleteSpace F] (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => x) (p.sum x) :=
(p.summable hx).hasSum
theorem radius_le_radius_continuousLinearMap_comp (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(f : F →L[𝕜] G) : p.radius ≤ (f.compFormalMultilinearSeries p).radius := by
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr => ?_
apply le_radius_of_isBigO
apply (IsBigO.trans_isLittleO _ (p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr)).isBigO
refine IsBigO.mul (@IsBigOWith.isBigO _ _ _ _ _ ‖f‖ _ _ _ ?_) (isBigO_refl _ _)
refine IsBigOWith.of_bound (Eventually.of_forall fun n => ?_)
simpa only [norm_norm] using f.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le (p n)
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### Expanding a function as a power series -/
section
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {s t : Set E} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Given a function `f : E → F` and a formal multilinear series `p`, we say that `f` has `p` as
a power series on the ball of radius `r > 0` around `x` if `f (x + y) = ∑' pₙ yⁿ` for all `‖y‖ < r`.
-/
structure HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
Prop where
r_le : r ≤ p.radius
r_pos : 0 < r
hasSum :
∀ {y}, y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r → HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y))
/-- Analogue of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall` where convergence is required only on a set `s`. We also
require convergence at `x` as the behavior of this notion is very bad otherwise. -/
structure HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (s : Set E)
(x : E) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : Prop where
/-- `p` converges on `ball 0 r` -/
r_le : r ≤ p.radius
/-- The radius of convergence is positive -/
r_pos : 0 < r
/-- `p converges to f` within `s` -/
hasSum : ∀ {y}, x + y ∈ insert x s → y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r →
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y))
/-- Given a function `f : E → F` and a formal multilinear series `p`, we say that `f` has `p` as
a power series around `x` if `f (x + y) = ∑' pₙ yⁿ` for all `y` in a neighborhood of `0`. -/
def HasFPowerSeriesAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) :=
∃ r, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r
/-- Analogue of `HasFPowerSeriesAt` where convergence is required only on a set `s`. -/
def HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ r, HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r
-- Teach the `bound` tactic that power series have positive radius
attribute [bound_forward] HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.r_pos HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.r_pos
variable (𝕜)
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is analytic at `x` if it admits a convergent power
series expansion around `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def AnalyticAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x
/-- `f` is analytic within `s` at `x` if it has a power series at `x` that converges on `𝓝[s] x` -/
def AnalyticWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop :=
∃ p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is analytic on a set `s` if it is analytic around
every point of `s`. -/
def AnalyticOnNhd (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x, x ∈ s → AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x
/-- `f` is analytic within `s` if it is analytic within `s` at each point of `s`. Note that
this is weaker than `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`, as `f` is allowed to be arbitrary outside `s`. -/
def AnalyticOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-!
### `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall` and `HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall`
-/
variable {𝕜}
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x :=
⟨r, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨p, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x :=
⟨r, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.analyticWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := ⟨p, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.analyticWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
hf.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.analyticWithinAt
/-- If a function `f` has a power series `p` around `x`, then the function `z ↦ f (z - y)` has the
same power series around `x + y`. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.comp_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (y : E) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun z => f (z - y)) p (x + y) r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {z} hz => by
convert hf.hasSum hz using 2
abel }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ (insert x s) ∩ EMetric.ball x r) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => y - x) (f y) := by
have : y - x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy.2
have := hf.hasSum (by simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using hy.1) this
simpa only [add_sub_cancel]
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball x r) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => y - x) (f y) := by
have : y - x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy
simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using hf.hasSum this
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : 0 < p.radius :=
lt_of_lt_of_le hf.r_pos hf.r_le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) :
0 < p.radius :=
lt_of_lt_of_le hf.r_pos hf.r_le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : 0 < p.radius :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.radius_pos
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.of_le
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) (r'_pos : 0 < r') (hr : r' ≤ r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r' :=
⟨le_trans hr hf.1, r'_pos, fun hy h'y => hf.hasSum hy (EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr h'y)⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (r'_pos : 0 < r')
(hr : r' ≤ r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r' :=
⟨le_trans hr hf.1, r'_pos, fun hy => hf.hasSum (EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr hy)⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
{s : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(h' : EqOn g f (s ∩ EMetric.ball x r)) (h'' : g x = f x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r := by
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, ?_⟩
intro y hy h'y
convert h.hasSum hy h'y using 1
simp only [mem_insert_iff, add_eq_left] at hy
rcases hy with rfl | hy
· simpa using h''
· apply h'
refine ⟨hy, ?_⟩
simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using h'y
/-- Variant of `HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr` in which one requests equality on `insert x s`
instead of separating `x` and `s`. -/
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr' {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
{s : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(h' : EqOn g f (insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x r)) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r := by
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} hy h'y ↦ ?_⟩
convert h.hasSum hy h'y using 1
exact h' ⟨hy, by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using h'y⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.congr {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {s : Set E}
{x : E} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (h' : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (h'' : g x = f x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt g p s x := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0, EMetric.ball x ε ∩ s ⊆ {y | g y = f y} :=
EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h'
let r' := min r ε
refine ⟨r', ?_⟩
have := hr.of_le (r' := r') (by simp [r', εpos, hr.r_pos]) (min_le_left _ _)
apply this.congr _ h''
intro z hz
exact hε ⟨EMetric.ball_subset_ball (min_le_right _ _) hz.2, hz.1⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hg : EqOn f g (EMetric.ball x r)) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {y} hy => by
convert hf.hasSum hy using 1
apply hg.symm
simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt g p x := by
rcases hf with ⟨r₁, h₁⟩
rcases EMetric.mem_nhds_iff.mp hg with ⟨r₂, h₂pos, h₂⟩
exact ⟨min r₁ r₂,
(h₁.mono (lt_min h₁.r_pos h₂pos) inf_le_left).congr
fun y hy => h₂ (EMetric.ball_subset_ball inf_le_right hy)⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.unique (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r) :
(insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x r).EqOn f g := fun _ hy ↦
(hf.hasSum_sub hy).unique (hg.hasSum_sub hy)
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.unique (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x r) : (EMetric.ball x r).EqOn f g := fun _ hy ↦
(hf.hasSum_sub hy).unique (hg.hasSum_sub hy)
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.eventually (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hr.r_pos) fun _ hr' => hr.of_le hr'.1 hr'.2.le
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hr.r_pos) fun _ hr' => hr.mono hr'.1 hr'.2.le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds (0 : E) hf.r_pos] using fun _ => hf.hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds x hf.r_pos] with y using hf.hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 := by
filter_upwards [hf.eventually_hasSum_sub] with z hz using hz.unique hasSum_zero
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p univ x r ↔ HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} m ↦ h.hasSum (by simp) m⟩
· intro h
exact ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} _ m => h.hasSum m⟩
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_univ :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p univ x ↔ HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x := by
simp only [HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt, hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ, HasFPowerSeriesAt]
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) (h : t ⊆ s) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p t x r where
r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum hy h'y := hf.hasSum (insert_subset_insert h hy) h'y
lemma HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ] at hf
exact hf.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (h : t ⊆ s) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p t x := by
obtain ⟨r, hp⟩ := hf
exact ⟨r, hp.mono h⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_univ] at hf
apply hf.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p t x := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
rcases EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 hst with ⟨r', r'_pos, hr'⟩
refine ⟨min r r', ?_⟩
have Z := hr.of_le (by simp [r'_pos, hr.r_pos]) (min_le_left r r')
refine ⟨Z.r_le, Z.r_pos, fun {y} hy h'y ↦ ?_⟩
apply Z.hasSum ?_ h'y
simp only [mem_insert_iff, add_eq_left] at hy
rcases hy with rfl | hy
· simp
apply mem_insert_of_mem _ (hr' ?_)
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_enorm_sub, sub_zero, lt_min_iff, mem_inter_iff,
add_sub_cancel_left, hy, and_true] at h'y ⊢
exact h'y.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_insert_self :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p (insert x s) x r ↔ HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩ <;>
exact ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} ↦ by simpa only [insert_idem] using h.hasSum (y := y)⟩
@[simp] theorem hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p (insert y s) x ↔ HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | hy
· simp [HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt]
· refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert _ _), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
apply HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin h
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne hy]
exact self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f pf s x r)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : pf 0 v = f x := by
have v_eq : v = fun i => 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have zero_mem : (0 : E) ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simp [hf.r_pos]
have : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → (pf i fun _ => 0) = 0 := by
intro i hi
have : 0 < i := pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hi
exact ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero _ (⟨0, this⟩ : Fin i) rfl
have A := (hf.hasSum (by simp) zero_mem).unique (hasSum_single _ this)
simpa [v_eq] using A.symm
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : pf 0 v = f x := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ] at hf
exact hf.coeff_zero v
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f pf s x) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.coeff_zero v
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.coeff_zero v
/-!
### Analytic functions
-/
@[simp] theorem analyticOn_empty : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f ∅ := by intro; simp
@[simp] theorem analyticOnNhd_empty : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f ∅ := by intro; simp
@[simp] lemma analyticWithinAt_univ :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp [AnalyticWithinAt, AnalyticAt]
@[simp] lemma analyticOn_univ {f : E → F} :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 f univ ↔ AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f univ := by
simp only [AnalyticOn, analyticWithinAt_univ, AnalyticOnNhd]
|
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.mono (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : t ⊆ s) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f t x := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hf
exact ⟨p, hp.mono h⟩
lemma AnalyticAt.analyticWithinAt (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rw [← analyticWithinAt_univ] at hf
apply hf.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma AnalyticOnNhd.analyticOn (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).analyticWithinAt
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x := by
rcases hf with ⟨p, hp⟩
exact ⟨p, hp.congr hs hx⟩
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x := by
apply hf.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono x (subset_insert x s) hs)
apply mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) hs
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : EqOn g f s) (hx : g x = f x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x :=
hf.congr_of_eventuallyEq hs.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin hx
lemma AnalyticOn.congr {f g : E → F} {s : Set E}
(hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : EqOn g f s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s :=
fun x m ↦ (hf x m).congr hs (hs m)
theorem AnalyticAt.congr (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
(hpf.congr hg).analyticAt
theorem analyticAt_congr (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x ↔ AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.congr h, fun hg ↦ hg.congr h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.mono {s t : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f t) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s :=
fun z hz => hf z (hst hz)
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.congr' (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).congr (mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mp hg z hz)
theorem analyticOnNhd_congr' (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s ↔ AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.congr (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hg : s.EqOn f g) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
hf.congr' <| mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mpr
(fun _ hz => eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨s, hs.mem_nhds hz, hg⟩)
theorem analyticOnNhd_congr (hs : IsOpen s) (h : s.EqOn f g) : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s ↔
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s := ⟨fun hf => hf.congr hs h, fun hg => hg.congr hs h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 737 | 798 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
import Mathlib.Tactic.StacksAttribute
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file defines semirings, rings and domains. This is analogous to `Algebra.Group.Defs` and
`Algebra.Group.Basic`, the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
## Main definitions
* `Distrib`: Typeclass for distributivity of multiplication over addition.
* `HasDistribNeg`: Typeclass for commutativity of negation and multiplication. This is useful when
dealing with multiplicative submonoids which are closed under negation without being closed under
addition, for example `Units`.
* `(NonUnital)(NonAssoc)(Semi)Ring`: Typeclasses for possibly non-unital or non-associative
rings and semirings. Some combinations are not defined yet because they haven't found use.
For Lie Rings, there is a type synonym `CommutatorRing` defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalHom.lean` turning the bracket into a multiplication so that the
instance `instNonUnitalNonAssocSemiringCommutatorRing` can be defined.
## Tags
`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`, domain, `IsDomain`, nonzero, units
-/
/-!
Previously an import dependency on `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic` had crept in.
In general, the `.Defs` files in the basic algebraic hierarchy should only depend on earlier `.Defs`
files, without importing `.Basic` theory development.
These `assert_not_exists` statements guard against this returning.
-/
assert_not_exists DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid mul_rotate
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {R : Type v}
open Function
/-!
### `Distrib` class
-/
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left and right distributive
over addition. -/
class Distrib (R : Type*) extends Mul R, Add R where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left distributive over addition. -/
class LeftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is right distributive over addition. -/
class RightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.leftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] : LeftDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.left_distrib⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.rightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] :
RightDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.right_distrib⟩
theorem left_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
LeftDistribClass.left_distrib a b c
alias mul_add := left_distrib
theorem right_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
RightDistribClass.right_distrib a b c
alias add_mul := right_distrib
theorem distrib_three_right [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c d : R) :
(a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d := by simp [right_distrib]
/-!
### Classes of semirings and rings
We make sure that the canonical path from `NonAssocSemiring` to `Ring` passes through `Semiring`,
as this is a path which is followed all the time in linear algebra where the defining semilinear map
`σ : R →+* S` depends on the `NonAssocSemiring` structure of `R` and `S` while the module
definition depends on the `Semiring` structure.
It is not currently possible to adjust priorities by hand (see https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2115). Instead, the last
declared instance is used, so we make sure that `Semiring` is declared after `NonAssocRing`, so
that `Semiring -> NonAssocSemiring` is tried before `NonAssocRing -> NonAssocSemiring`.
TODO: clean this once https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2115 is fixed
-/
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative semiring. See `CommutatorRing` and the
documentation thereof in case you need a `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` instance on a Lie ring
or a Lie algebra. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends AddCommMonoid α, Distrib α, MulZeroClass α
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital semiring. -/
class NonUnitalSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, SemigroupWithZero α
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative semiring. -/
class NonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, MulZeroOneClass α,
AddCommMonoidWithOne α
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocRing (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital ring. -/
class NonUnitalRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonUnitalSemiring α
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonAssocRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonAssocSemiring α,
AddCommGroupWithOne α
/-- A `Semiring` is a type with addition, multiplication, a `0` and a `1` where addition is
commutative and associative, multiplication is associative and left and right distributive over
addition, and `0` and `1` are additive and multiplicative identities. -/
class Semiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, NonAssocSemiring α, MonoidWithZero α
/-- A `Ring` is a `Semiring` with negation making it an additive group. -/
class Ring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, AddCommGroup R, AddGroupWithOne R
/-!
### Semirings
-/
section DistribMulOneClass
variable [Add α] [MulOneClass α]
theorem add_one_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (a + 1) * b = a * b + b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
theorem mul_add_one [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
theorem one_add_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (1 + a) * b = b + a * b := by
| rw [add_mul, one_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean | 160 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
/-!
# Perpendicular bisector of a segment
We define `AffineSubspace.perpBisector p₁ p₂` to be the perpendicular bisector of the segment
`[p₁, p₂]`, as a bundled affine subspace. We also prove that a point belongs to the perpendicular
bisector if and only if it is equidistant from `p₁` and `p₂`, as well as a few linear equations that
define this subspace.
## Keywords
euclidean geometry, perpendicular, perpendicular bisector, line segment bisector, equidistant
-/
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- Perpendicular bisector of a segment in a Euclidean affine space. -/
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) (LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)))
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `p₂ -ᵥ p₁` is orthogonal to
`c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A point `c` belongs the perpendicular bisector of `[p₁, p₂] iff `c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂` is
orthogonal to `p₂ -ᵥ p₁`. -/
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem midpoint_mem_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ := by
simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero]
theorem perpBisector_nonempty : (perpBisector p₁ p₂ : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨_, midpoint_mem_perpBisector _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem direction_perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) :
(perpBisector p₁ p₂).direction = (ℝ ∙ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))ᗮ := by
rw [perpBisector, direction_mk']
ext x
exact Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [Iff.comm, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← add_neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ← inner_add_left, vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add,
real_inner_smul_left]; simp
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₁, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = (dist p₁ p₂) ^ 2 / 2 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right _ _ p₁, inner_sub_left,
sub_eq_zero, midpoint_vsub_left, invOf_eq_inv, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist c p₁ = dist c p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff,
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left, inner_add_left, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← inner_neg_right,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner]
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq' : c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ dist p₁ c = dist p₂ c := by
simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, dist_comm]
theorem perpBisector_comm (p₁ p₂ : P) : perpBisector p₁ p₂ = perpBisector p₂ p₁ := by
ext c; simp only [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem right_mem_perpBisector : p₂ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
simpa [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner] using eq_comm
@[simp] theorem left_mem_perpBisector : p₁ ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
rw [perpBisector_comm, right_mem_perpBisector, eq_comm]
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_self (p : P) : perpBisector p p = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ ↦ by simp [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_inner]
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_eq_top : perpBisector p₁ p₂ = ⊤ ↔ p₁ = p₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h ▸ perpBisector_self _⟩
rw [← left_mem_perpBisector, h]
trivial
@[simp] theorem perpBisector_ne_bot : perpBisector p₁ p₂ ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [← nonempty_iff_ne_bot]; exact perpBisector_nonempty
end AffineSubspace
|
open AffineSubspace
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 117 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
theorem rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| a :: l, 0, m => by simp
| [], n, m => by simp
| a :: l, n + 1, m => by
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate' _ n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← rotate'_cons_succ,
Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length (l : List α) : rotate' l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate'_eq_drop_append_take le_rfl]; simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length_mul (l : List α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length := by
simp [-rotate'_length, Nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
_ = l := by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul l n]
theorem rotate'_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc
l.rotate' (n % l.length) =
(l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate' ((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) :=
by rw [rotate'_length_mul]
_ = l.rotate' n := by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp_all [length_eq_zero_iff]
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod,
rotate'_eq_drop_append_take (le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))]
simp [rotate]
@[simp] theorem rotate_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate (n + 1) = (l ++ [a]).rotate n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rotate : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [], _, n => by simp
| a :: l, _, 0 => by simp
| a :: l, _, n + 1 => by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or_comm]
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_replicate (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : (replicate n a).rotate k = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate_iff.2 ⟨by rw [length_rotate, length_replicate], fun b hb =>
eq_of_mem_replicate <| mem_rotate.1 hb⟩
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ l.length → l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']; exact rotate'_eq_drop_append_take
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l.drop (n % l.length) ++ l.take (n % l.length) := by
rcases l.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· simp [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm]
rw [← rotate_eq_drop_append_take (n.mod_lt hl).le, rotate_mod]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_append_length_eq (l l' : List α) : (l ++ l').rotate l.length = l' ++ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction l generalizing l'
· simp
· simp_all [rotate']
theorem rotate_rotate (l : List α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length (l : List α) : rotate l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length_mul (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
theorem rotate_perm (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate'_cons_succ]
exact (hn _).trans (perm_append_singleton _ _)
@[simp]
theorem nodup_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : Nodup (l.rotate n) ↔ Nodup l :=
(rotate_perm l n).nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [rotate_cons_succ, hn]
theorem nil_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : [] = l.rotate n ↔ [] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : [x].rotate n = [x] :=
rotate_replicate x 1 n
theorem zipWith_rotate_distrib {β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) (l' : List β) (n : ℕ)
(h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zipWith f l l').rotate n = zipWith f (l.rotate n) (l'.rotate n) := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod,
rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, h, zipWith_append, ← drop_zipWith, ←
take_zipWith, List.length_zipWith, h, min_self]
rw [length_drop, length_drop, h]
theorem zipWith_rotate_one {β : Type*} (f : α → α → β) (x y : α) (l : List α) :
zipWith f (x :: y :: l) ((x :: y :: l).rotate 1) = f x y :: zipWith f (y :: l) (l ++ [x]) := by
simp
theorem getElem?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n)[m]? = l[(m + n) % l.length]? := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod]
rcases lt_or_le m (l.drop (n % l.length)).length with hm | hm
· rw [getElem?_append_left hm, getElem?_drop, ← add_mod_mod]
rw [length_drop, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hm
rw [mod_eq_of_lt hm, Nat.add_comm]
· have hlt : n % length l < length l := mod_lt _ (m.zero_le.trans_lt hml)
rw [getElem?_append_right hm, getElem?_take_of_lt, length_drop]
· congr 1
rw [length_drop] at hm
have hm' := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 hm
have : n % length l + m - length l < length l := by
rw [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add hm']
exact Nat.add_lt_add hlt hml
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm m, ← mod_add_mod, mod_eq_sub_mod hm', mod_eq_of_lt this]
omega
· rwa [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add' hm, length_drop, Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le]
theorem getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (h : k < (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n)[k] =
l[(k + n) % l.length]'(mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_rotate]
exact h.trans_eq (length_rotate _ _)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated getElem?_rotate (since := "2025-02-14")]
theorem get?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n).get? m = l.get? ((m + n) % l.length) := by
simp only [get?_eq_getElem?, length_rotate, hml, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_rotate]
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
theorem get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n).get k = l.get ⟨(k + n) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.pos)⟩ := by
simp [getElem_rotate]
theorem head?_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) : head? (l.rotate n) = l[n]? := by
rw [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_rotate (n.zero_le.trans_lt h), Nat.zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem get_rotate_one (l : List α) (k : Fin (l.rotate 1).length) :
(l.rotate 1).get k = l.get ⟨(k + 1) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l 1 ▸ k.pos)⟩ :=
get_rotate l 1 k
/-- A version of `List.getElem_rotate` that represents `l[k]` in terms of
`(List.rotate l n)[⋯]`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.getElem_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem getElem_eq_getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (hk : k < l.length) :
l[k] = ((l.rotate n)[(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length]'
((Nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm)) := by
rw [getElem_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [hk, (mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).le]
/-- A version of `List.get_rotate` that represents `List.get l` in terms of
`List.get (List.rotate l n)`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.get_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem get_eq_get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin l.length) :
l.get k = (l.rotate n).get ⟨(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length,
(Nat.mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm⟩ := by
rw [get_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [k.2, (mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).le]
theorem rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [hα : Nonempty α] :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = replicate l.length a
| [] => by simp
| a :: l => ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ext_getElem length_replicate.symm fun n h₁ h₂ => by
rw [getElem_replicate, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← head?_rotate h₁, h,
head?_cons]⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ n => by rw [hb, rotate_replicate]⟩
theorem rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [Nonempty α] {l : List α} :
l.rotate 1 = l ↔ ∃ a : α, l = List.replicate l.length a :=
⟨fun h =>
rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp fun n =>
Nat.rec l.rotate_zero (fun n hn => by rwa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← l.rotate_rotate, hn]) n,
fun h => rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mpr h 1⟩
theorem rotate_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun l : List α => l.rotate n := by
rintro l l' (h : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n)
have hle : l.length = l'.length := (l.length_rotate n).symm.trans (h.symm ▸ l'.length_rotate n)
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod] at h
obtain ⟨hd, ht⟩ := append_inj h (by simp_all)
rw [← take_append_drop _ l, ht, hd, take_append_drop]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n ↔ l = l' :=
(rotate_injective n).eq_iff
theorem rotate_eq_iff {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l' ↔ l = l'.rotate (l'.length - n % l'.length) := by
rw [← @rotate_eq_rotate _ l _ n, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod l', add_mod]
rcases l'.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm, rotate_nil]
· rcases (Nat.zero_le (n % l'.length)).eq_or_lt with hn | hn
· simp [← hn]
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt hl hn), Nat.sub_add_cancel, mod_self, rotate_zero]
exact (Nat.mod_lt _ hl).le
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_singleton_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : l.rotate n = [x] ↔ l = [x] := by
rw [rotate_eq_iff, rotate_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : [x] = l.rotate n ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem reverse_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
(l.rotate n).reverse = l.reverse.rotate (l.length - n % l.length) := by
rw [← length_reverse, ← rotate_eq_iff]
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate_cons_succ, ← rotate_rotate, hn]
simp
theorem rotate_reverse (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
l.reverse.rotate n = (l.rotate (l.length - n % l.length)).reverse := by
rw [← reverse_reverse l]
simp_rw [reverse_rotate, reverse_reverse, rotate_eq_iff, rotate_rotate, length_rotate,
length_reverse]
rw [← length_reverse]
let k := n % l.reverse.length
rcases hk' : k with - | k'
· simp_all! [k, length_reverse, ← rotate_rotate]
· rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· simp
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.sub_add_cancel, rotate_length]
· exact Nat.sub_le _ _
· exact Nat.sub_lt (by simp) (by simp_all! [k])
theorem map_rotate {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
map f (l.rotate n) = (map f l).rotate n := by
induction' n with n hn IH generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [hn]
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (hn : l ≠ []) (i j : ℕ)
(h : l.rotate i = l.rotate j) : i % l.length = j % l.length := by
rw [← rotate_mod l i, ← rotate_mod l j] at h
simpa only [head?_rotate, mod_lt, length_pos_of_ne_nil hn, getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj,
hl.getElem_inj_iff, Fin.ext_iff] using congr_arg head? h
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {i j : ℕ} :
l.rotate i = l.rotate j ↔ i % l.length = j % l.length ∨ l = [] := by
rcases eq_or_ne l [] with rfl | hn
· simp
· simp only [hn, or_false]
refine ⟨hl.rotate_congr hn _ _, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← rotate_mod, h, rotate_mod]
theorem Nodup.rotate_eq_self_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l ↔ n % l.length = 0 ∨ l = [] := by
rw [← zero_mod, ← hl.rotate_congr_iff, rotate_zero]
section IsRotated
variable (l l' : List α)
/-- `IsRotated l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~r l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are cyclic permutations
of each other. This is defined by claiming that `∃ n, l.rotate n = l'`. -/
def IsRotated : Prop :=
∃ n, l.rotate n = l'
@[inherit_doc List.IsRotated]
-- This matches the precedence of the infix `~` for `List.Perm`, and of other relation infixes
infixr:50 " ~r " => IsRotated
variable {l l'}
@[refl]
theorem IsRotated.refl (l : List α) : l ~r l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
@[symm]
theorem IsRotated.symm (h : l ~r l') : l' ~r l := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· exists 0
· use (hd :: tl).length * n - n
rw [rotate_rotate, Nat.add_sub_cancel', rotate_length_mul]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (by simp)
theorem isRotated_comm : l ~r l' ↔ l' ~r l :=
⟨IsRotated.symm, IsRotated.symm⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem IsRotated.forall (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~r l :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[trans]
theorem IsRotated.trans : ∀ {l l' l'' : List α}, l ~r l' → l' ~r l'' → l ~r l''
| _, _, _, ⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩ => ⟨n + m, by rw [rotate_rotate]⟩
theorem IsRotated.eqv : Equivalence (@IsRotated α) :=
Equivalence.mk IsRotated.refl IsRotated.symm IsRotated.trans
/-- The relation `List.IsRotated l l'` forms a `Setoid` of cycles. -/
def IsRotated.setoid (α : Type*) : Setoid (List α) where
r := IsRotated
iseqv := IsRotated.eqv
theorem IsRotated.perm (h : l ~r l') : l ~ l' :=
Exists.elim h fun _ hl => hl ▸ (rotate_perm _ _).symm
theorem IsRotated.nodup_iff (h : l ~r l') : Nodup l ↔ Nodup l' :=
h.perm.nodup_iff
theorem IsRotated.mem_iff (h : l ~r l') {a : α} : a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ l' :=
h.perm.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff : l ~r [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff' : [] ~r l ↔ [] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff {x : α} : l ~r [x] ↔ l = [x] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff' {x : α} : [x] ~r l ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem isRotated_concat (hd : α) (tl : List α) : (tl ++ [hd]) ~r (hd :: tl) :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨1, by simp⟩
theorem isRotated_append : (l ++ l') ~r (l' ++ l) :=
⟨l.length, by simp⟩
theorem IsRotated.reverse (h : l ~r l') : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, (reverse_rotate _ _).symm⟩
theorem isRotated_reverse_comm_iff : l.reverse ~r l' ↔ l ~r l'.reverse := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
simpa using h.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_reverse_iff : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse ↔ l ~r l' := by
simp [isRotated_reverse_comm_iff]
theorem isRotated_iff_mod : l ~r l' ↔ ∃ n ≤ l.length, l.rotate n = l' := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, _, h⟩ => ⟨n, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· refine ⟨n % (hd :: tl).length, ?_, rotate_mod _ _⟩
refine (Nat.mod_lt _ ?_).le
simp
theorem isRotated_iff_mem_map_range : l ~r l' ↔ l' ∈ (List.range (l.length + 1)).map l.rotate := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, isRotated_iff_mod]
exact
⟨fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hn, h⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn, h⟩⟩
theorem IsRotated.map {β : Type*} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ~r l₂) (f : α → β) :
map f l₁ ~r map f l₂ := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rw [map_rotate]
use n
theorem IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast
(L : List α) (hL : L ≠ []) : L.getLast hL :: L.dropLast ~r L := by
induction L using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => simp at hL
| append_singleton a L _ =>
simp only [getLast_append, dropLast_concat]
apply IsRotated.symm
apply isRotated_concat
theorem IsRotated.dropLast_tail {α}
{L : List α} (hL : L ≠ []) (hL' : L.head hL = L.getLast hL) : L.dropLast ~r L.tail :=
match L with
| [] => by simp
| [_] => by simp
| a :: b :: L => by
simp only [head_cons, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, getLast_cons] at hL'
simp [hL', IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast]
/-- List of all cyclic permutations of `l`.
The `cyclicPermutations` of a nonempty list `l` will always contain `List.length l` elements.
This implies that under certain conditions, there are duplicates in `List.cyclicPermutations l`.
The `n`th entry is equal to `l.rotate n`, proven in `List.get_cyclicPermutations`.
The proof that every cyclic permutant of `l` is in the list is `List.mem_cyclicPermutations_iff`.
cyclicPermutations [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] =
[[1, 2, 3, 2, 4], [2, 3, 2, 4, 1], [3, 2, 4, 1, 2],
[2, 4, 1, 2, 3], [4, 1, 2, 3, 2]] -/
def cyclicPermutations : List α → List (List α)
| [] => [[]]
| l@(_ :: _) => dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails l) (inits l))
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_nil : cyclicPermutations ([] : List α) = [[]] :=
rfl
theorem cyclicPermutations_cons (x : α) (l : List α) :
cyclicPermutations (x :: l) = dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails (x :: l)) (inits (x :: l))) :=
rfl
theorem cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) :
cyclicPermutations l = dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails l) (inits l)) := by
obtain ⟨hd, tl, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_ne_nil h
exact cyclicPermutations_cons _ _
theorem length_cyclicPermutations_cons (x : α) (l : List α) :
length (cyclicPermutations (x :: l)) = length l + 1 := by simp [cyclicPermutations_cons]
@[simp]
theorem length_cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) :
length (cyclicPermutations l) = length l := by simp [cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil _ h]
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_ne_nil : ∀ l : List α, cyclicPermutations l ≠ []
| a::l, h => by simpa using congr_arg length h
@[simp]
theorem getElem_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) (n : Nat) (h : n < length (cyclicPermutations l)) :
(cyclicPermutations l)[n] = l.rotate n := by
cases l with
| nil => simp
| | cons a l =>
simp only [cyclicPermutations_cons, getElem_dropLast, getElem_zipWith, getElem_tails,
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 523 | 524 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ']
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
theorem card_image₂_iff :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_mem_image2]
lemma exists_mem_image₂ {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, exists_mem_image2]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image₂_iff := forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image₂
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_left : image₂ f {a} t = t.image fun b => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image₂_singleton_right : image₂ f s {b} = s.image fun a => f a b :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image₂_singleton_left' : image₂ f {a} t = t.image (f a) :=
image₂_singleton_left
theorem image₂_singleton : image₂ f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
theorem image₂_union_left [DecidableEq α] : image₂ f (s ∪ s') t = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_left
theorem image₂_union_right [DecidableEq β] : image₂ f s (t ∪ t') = image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (insert a s) t = (t.image fun b => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_insert_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (insert b t) = (s.image fun a => f a b) ∪ image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_insert_right
theorem image₂_inter_left [DecidableEq α] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_left hf
theorem image₂_inter_right [DecidableEq β] (hf : Injective2 f) :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') = image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_right hf
theorem image₂_inter_subset_left [DecidableEq α] :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s' t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_left
theorem image₂_inter_subset_right [DecidableEq β] :
image₂ f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∩ image₂ f s t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_subset_right
theorem image₂_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_congr h
/-- A common special case of `image₂_congr` -/
theorem image₂_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image₂ f s t = image₂ f' s t :=
image₂_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
variable (s t)
theorem card_image₂_singleton_left (hf : Injective (f a)) : #(image₂ f {a} t) = #t := by
rw [image₂_singleton_left, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem card_image₂_singleton_right (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
#(image₂ f s {b}) = #s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, card_image_of_injective _ hf]
theorem image₂_singleton_inter [DecidableEq β] (t₁ t₂ : Finset β) (hf : Injective (f a)) :
image₂ f {a} (t₁ ∩ t₂) = image₂ f {a} t₁ ∩ image₂ f {a} t₂ := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_left, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem image₂_inter_singleton [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective fun a => f a b) :
image₂ f (s₁ ∩ s₂) {b} = image₂ f s₁ {b} ∩ image₂ f s₂ {b} := by
simp_rw [image₂_singleton_right, image_inter _ _ hf]
theorem card_le_card_image₂_left {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (hf : ∀ a, Injective (f a)) :
#t ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_left _ (hf a)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_right <| singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)
theorem card_le_card_image₂_right {t : Finset β} (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hf : ∀ b, Injective fun a => f a b) : #s ≤ #(image₂ f s t) := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ht
rw [← card_image₂_singleton_right _ (hf b)]
exact card_le_card (image₂_subset_left <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hb)
variable {s t}
theorem biUnion_image_left : (s.biUnion fun a => t.image <| f a) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_left _
theorem biUnion_image_right : (t.biUnion fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) = image₂ f s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.iUnion_image_right _
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Finset.image₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `image₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `image₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`image₂ (*) f g = image₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
section
variable [DecidableEq δ]
theorem image_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2 _ _
theorem image₂_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = image₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_left _ _
theorem image₂_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = image₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_mk_eq_product [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := by ext; simp [Prod.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem image₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ (curry f) s t = (s ×ˢ t).image f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_uncurry_product (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry f) = image₂ f s t := rfl
theorem image₂_swap (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
image₂ f s t = image₂ (fun a b => f b a) t s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_swap _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem image₂_left [DecidableEq α] (h : t.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun x _ => x) s t = s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left h
@[simp]
theorem image₂_right [DecidableEq β] (h : s.Nonempty) : image₂ (fun _ y => y) s t = t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_right h
theorem image₂_assoc {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ}
{f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε}
{g' : β → γ → ε'} (h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ f' s (image₂ g' t u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_assoc h_assoc
theorem image₂_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : image₂ f s t = image₂ g t s :=
(image₂_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
theorem image₂_left_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε} (h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
image₂ f s (image₂ g t u) = image₂ g' t (image₂ f' s u) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_left_comm h_left_comm
theorem image₂_right_comm {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ}
{f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : δ' → β → ε} (h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f' a c) b) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u = image₂ g' (image₂ f' s u) t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_right_comm h_right_comm
theorem image₂_image₂_image₂_comm {γ δ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {v : Finset δ} [DecidableEq ζ]
[DecidableEq ζ'] [DecidableEq ν] {f : ε → ζ → ν} {g : α → β → ε} {h : γ → δ → ζ}
{f' : ε' → ζ' → ν} {g' : α → γ → ε'} {h' : β → δ → ζ'}
(h_comm : ∀ a b c d, f (g a b) (h c d) = f' (g' a c) (h' b d)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) (image₂ h u v) = image₂ f' (image₂ g' s u) (image₂ h' t v) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image2_image2_image2_comm h_comm
theorem image_image₂_distrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β' → δ} {g₁ : α → α'} {g₂ : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ a) (g₂ b)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (s.image g₁) (t.image g₂) :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image₂_image_left_comm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_distrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : α' → β → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' a) b) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (s.image g') t :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib_left h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_right_comm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_distrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : α → β' → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' a (g' b)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' s (t.image g') :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_distrib_right h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_distrib_left`. -/
theorem image₂_image_left_comm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' a b)) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = (image₂ f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image₂_distrib_left fun a b => (h_left_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_distrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image₂_right_comm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : α → β → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' a b)) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = (image₂ f' s t).image g' :=
(image_image₂_distrib_right fun a b => (h_right_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `s`-`s` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image₂_distrib_subset_left {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ}
{f₁ : α → β → β'} {f₂ : α → γ → γ'} {g' : β' → γ' → ε}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' (f₁ a b) (f₂ a c)) :
image₂ f s (image₂ g t u) ⊆ image₂ g' (image₂ f₁ s t) (image₂ f₂ s u) :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_distrib_subset_left h_distrib
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `u`-`u` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem image₂_distrib_subset_right {γ : Type*} {u : Finset γ} {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ}
{f₁ : α → γ → α'} {f₂ : β → γ → β'} {g' : α' → β' → ε}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f₁ a c) (f₂ b c)) :
image₂ f (image₂ g s t) u ⊆ image₂ g' (image₂ f₁ s u) (image₂ f₂ t u) :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_distrib_subset_right h_distrib
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α' → δ} {g₁ : β → β'} {g₂ : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g₁ b) (g₂ a)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (t.image g₁) (s.image g₂) := by
rw [image₂_swap f]
exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ => h_antidistrib _ _
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image₂_image_left_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib_left {g : γ → δ} {f' : β' → α → δ} {g' : β → β'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' (g' b) a) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' (t.image g') s :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_antidistrib_left h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_right_anticomm`. -/
theorem image_image₂_antidistrib_right {g : γ → δ} {f' : β → α' → δ} {g' : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, g (f a b) = f' b (g' a)) :
(image₂ f s t).image g = image₂ f' t (s.image g') :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact image_image2_antidistrib_right h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_antidistrib_left`. -/
theorem image₂_image_left_anticomm {f : α' → β → γ} {g : α → α'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_left_anticomm : ∀ a b, f (g a) b = g' (f' b a)) :
image₂ f (s.image g) t = (image₂ f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image₂_antidistrib_left fun a b => (h_left_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Finset.image_image₂_antidistrib_right`. -/
theorem image_image₂_right_anticomm {f : α → β' → γ} {g : β → β'} {f' : β → α → δ} {g' : δ → γ}
(h_right_anticomm : ∀ a b, f a (g b) = g' (f' b a)) :
image₂ f s (t.image g) = (image₂ f' t s).image g' :=
(image_image₂_antidistrib_right fun a b => (h_right_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- If `a` is a left identity for `f : α → β → β`, then `{a}` is a left identity for
`Finset.image₂ f`. -/
theorem image₂_left_identity {f : α → γ → γ} {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f a b = b) (t : Finset γ) :
image₂ f {a} t = t :=
coe_injective <| by rw [coe_image₂, coe_singleton, Set.image2_left_identity h]
/-- If `b` is a right identity for `f : α → β → α`, then `{b}` is a right identity for
`Finset.image₂ f`. -/
theorem image₂_right_identity {f : γ → β → γ} {b : β} (h : ∀ a, f a b = a) (s : Finset γ) :
image₂ f s {b} = s := by rw [image₂_singleton_right, funext h, image_id']
/-- If each partial application of `f` is injective, and images of `s` under those partial
applications are disjoint (but not necessarily distinct!), then the size of `t` divides the size of
`Finset.image₂ f s t`. -/
theorem card_dvd_card_image₂_right (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Injective (f a))
(hs : ((fun a => t.image <| f a) '' s).PairwiseDisjoint id) : #t ∣ #(image₂ f s t) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s _ ih
· simp
specialize ih (forall_of_forall_insert hf)
(hs.subset <| Set.image_subset _ <| coe_subset.2 <| subset_insert _ _)
rw [image₂_insert_left]
by_cases h : Disjoint (image (f a) t) (image₂ f s t)
· rw [card_union_of_disjoint h]
exact Nat.dvd_add (card_image_of_injective _ <| hf _ <| mem_insert_self _ _).symm.dvd ih
simp_rw [← biUnion_image_left, disjoint_biUnion_right, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨b, hb, h⟩ := h
rwa [union_eq_right.2]
exact (hs.eq (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_insert_self _ _)
(Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_insert_of_mem hb) h).trans_subset
(image_subset_image₂_right hb)
/-- If each partial application of `f` is injective, and images of `t` under those partial
applications are disjoint (but not necessarily distinct!), then the size of `s` divides the size of
`Finset.image₂ f s t`. -/
theorem card_dvd_card_image₂_left (hf : ∀ b ∈ t, Injective fun a => f a b)
(ht : ((fun b => s.image fun a => f a b) '' t).PairwiseDisjoint id) :
#s ∣ #(image₂ f s t) := by rw [← image₂_swap]; exact card_dvd_card_image₂_right hf ht
/-- If a `Finset` is a subset of the image of two `Set`s under a binary operation,
then it is a subset of the `Finset.image₂` of two `Finset` subsets of these `Set`s. -/
theorem subset_set_image₂ {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hu : ↑u ⊆ image2 f s t) :
∃ (s' : Finset α) (t' : Finset β), ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← Set.image_prod, subset_set_image_iff] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
classical
use u.image Prod.fst, u.image Prod.snd
simp only [coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff, image₂_image_left, image₂_image_right,
image_subset_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ h ↦ (hu h).1, fun _ h ↦ (hu h).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_image₂_of_mem hx hx⟩
end
section UnionInter
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
theorem image₂_inter_union_subset_union :
image₂ f (s ∩ s') (t ∪ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_inter_union_subset_union
theorem image₂_union_inter_subset_union :
image₂ f (s ∪ s') (t ∩ t') ⊆ image₂ f s t ∪ image₂ f s' t' :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image2_union_inter_subset_union
theorem image₂_inter_union_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Finset α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image₂ f (s ∩ t) (s ∪ t) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_inter_union_subset hf
theorem image₂_union_inter_subset {f : α → α → β} {s t : Finset α} (hf : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a) :
image₂ f (s ∪ t) (s ∩ t) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact image2_union_inter_subset hf
end UnionInter
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup δ]
@[simp (default + 1)] -- otherwise `simp` doesn't use `forall_mem_image₂`
lemma sup'_image₂_le {g : γ → δ} {a : δ} (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
sup' (image₂ f s t) h g ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, g (f x y) ≤ a := by
rw [sup'_le_iff, forall_mem_image₂]
lemma sup'_image₂_left (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
sup' (image₂ f s t) h g =
sup' s h.of_image₂_left fun x ↦ sup' t h.of_image₂_right (g <| f x ·) := by
simp only [image₂, sup'_image, sup'_product_left]; rfl
lemma sup'_image₂_right (g : γ → δ) (h : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty) :
| sup' (image₂ f s t) h g =
sup' t h.of_image₂_right fun y ↦ sup' s h.of_image₂_left (g <| f · y) := by
simp only [image₂, sup'_image, sup'_product_right]; rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 523 | 525 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
/-!
# Euclidean spaces
This file makes some definitions and proves very basic geometrical
results about real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
Results about real inner product spaces that involve the norm and
inner product but not angles generally go in
`Analysis.NormedSpace.InnerProduct`. Results with longer
proofs or more geometrical content generally go in separate files.
## Implementation notes
To declare `P` as the type of points in a Euclidean affine space with
`V` as the type of vectors, use
`[NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]`.
This works better with `outParam` to make
`V` implicit in most cases than having a separate type alias for
Euclidean affine spaces.
Rather than requiring Euclidean affine spaces to be finite-dimensional
(as in the definition on Wikipedia), this is specified only for those
theorems that need it.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_space
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on Euclidean affine spaces
This section develops some geometrical definitions and results on
Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The inner product of two vectors given with `weightedVSub`, in
terms of the pairwise distances. -/
theorem inner_weightedVSub {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ} (p₁ : ι₁ → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ} (p₂ : ι₂ → P)
(h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪s₁.weightedVSub p₁ w₁, s₂.weightedVSub p₂ w₂⟫ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂) * dist (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂))) /
2 := by
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_apply, Finset.weightedVSub_apply,
inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero _ h₁ _ h₂]
simp_rw [vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
rcongr (i₁ i₂) <;> rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (p₁ i₁) (p₂ i₂)]
/-- The distance between two points given with `affineCombination`,
in terms of the pairwise distances between the points in that
combination. -/
theorem dist_affineCombination {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {w₁ w₂ : ι → ℝ} (p : ι → P)
(h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) : by
have a₁ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁
have a₂ := s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂
exact dist a₁ a₂ * dist a₁ a₂ = (-∑ i₁ ∈ s, ∑ i₂ ∈ s,
(w₁ - w₂) i₁ * (w₁ - w₂) i₂ * (dist (p i₁) (p i₂) * dist (p i₁) (p i₂))) / 2 := by
dsimp only
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₁) (s.affineCombination ℝ p w₂), ←
@inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
have h : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h₁, h₂, sub_self]
exact inner_weightedVSub p h p h
-- Porting note: `inner_vsub_vsub_of_dist_eq_of_dist_eq` moved to `PerpendicularBisector`
/-- The squared distance between points on a line (expressed as a
multiple of a fixed vector added to a point) and another point,
expressed as a quadratic. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_sq (r : ℝ) (v : V) (p₁ p₂ : P) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ * dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ =
⟪v, v⟫ * r * r + 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * r + ⟪p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, vadd_vsub_assoc,
real_inner_add_add_self, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right]
ring
/-- The condition for two points on a line to be equidistant from
another point. -/
theorem dist_smul_vadd_eq_dist {v : V} (p₁ p₂ : P) (hv : v ≠ 0) (r : ℝ) :
dist (r • v +ᵥ p₁) p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ ↔ r = 0 ∨ r = -2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ / ⟪v, v⟫ := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg, dist_smul_vadd_sq, mul_assoc,
← sub_eq_zero, add_sub_assoc, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₁ p₂, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sub_self]
have hvi : ⟪v, v⟫ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hv
have hd : discrim ⟪v, v⟫ (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) 0 = 2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ * (2 * ⟪v, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫) := by
rw [discrim]
ring
rw [quadratic_eq_zero_iff hvi hd, neg_add_cancel, zero_div, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ←
mul_sub_right_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_two, mul_assoc, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_mul_left,
mul_div_assoc]
| norm_num
open AffineSubspace Module
/-- Distances `r₁` `r₂` of `p` from two different points `c₁` `c₂` determine at
most two points `p₁` `p₂` in a two-dimensional subspace containing those points
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Basic.lean | 112 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Projection from cardinal numbers to natural numbers
In this file we define `Cardinal.toNat` to be the natural projection `Cardinal → ℕ`,
sending all infinite cardinals to zero.
We also prove basic lemmas about this definition.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Cardinal
variable {α : Type u} {c d : Cardinal.{u}}
/-- This function sends finite cardinals to the corresponding natural, and infinite cardinals
to 0. -/
noncomputable def toNat : Cardinal →*₀ ℕ :=
ENat.toNatHom.comp toENat
@[simp] lemma toNat_toENat (a : Cardinal) : ENat.toNat (toENat a) = toNat a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) : toNat n = ENat.toNat n :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| toENat_ofENat n
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem toNat_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNat n = n := toNat_ofENat n
@[simp]
lemma toNat_eq_zero : toNat c = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
rw [← toNat_toENat, ENat.toNat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_top]
lemma toNat_ne_zero : toNat c ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := by simp [not_or]
@[simp] lemma toNat_pos : 0 < toNat c ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans toNat_ne_zero
theorem cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ↑(toNat c) = c := by
lift c to ℕ using h
rw [toNat_natCast]
theorem toNat_apply_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal.{u}} (h : c < ℵ₀) :
toNat c = Classical.choose (lt_aleph0.1 h) :=
Nat.cast_injective (R := Cardinal.{u}) <| by
rw [cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 h, ← Classical.choose_spec (lt_aleph0.1 h)]
theorem toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : toNat c = 0 := by simp [h]
theorem cast_toNat_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : ↑(toNat c) = (0 : Cardinal) := by
rw [toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le h, Nat.cast_zero]
theorem cast_toNat_eq_iff_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : (toNat c) = c ↔ c < ℵ₀ := by
| constructor
· intro h; by_contra h'; rw [not_lt] at h'
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ToNat.lean | 60 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Quotient
/-!
# Adjoining roots of polynomials
This file defines the commutative ring `AdjoinRoot f`, the ring R[X]/(f) obtained from a
commutative ring `R` and a polynomial `f : R[X]`. If furthermore `R` is a field and `f` is
irreducible, the field structure on `AdjoinRoot f` is constructed.
We suggest stating results on `IsAdjoinRoot` instead of `AdjoinRoot` to achieve higher
generality, since `IsAdjoinRoot` works for all different constructions of `R[α]`
including `AdjoinRoot f = R[X]/(f)` itself.
## Main definitions and results
The main definitions are in the `AdjoinRoot` namespace.
* `mk f : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `of f : R →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `root f : AdjoinRoot f`, the image of X in R[X]/(f).
* `lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : (AdjoinRoot f) →+* S`, the ring
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `i : R →+* S` and sending `X` to `x`.
* `lift_hom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S`, the algebra
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `algebraMap R S` and sending `X` to `x`
* `equiv : (AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[F] E) ≃ {x // x ∈ f.aroots E}` a
bijection between algebra homomorphisms from `AdjoinRoot` and roots of `f` in `S`
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
/-- Adjoin a root of a polynomial `f` to a commutative ring `R`. We define the new ring
as the quotient of `R[X]` by the principal ideal generated by `f`. -/
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
/-- Ring homomorphism from `R[x]` to `AdjoinRoot f` sending `X` to the `root`. -/
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
/-- Embedding of the original ring `R` into `AdjoinRoot f`. -/
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
instance isScalarTower_right [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (AdjoinRoot f) (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (f : R[X]) :
DistribMulAction S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribMulAction' _
/-- `R[x]/(f)` is `R`-algebra -/
@[stacks 09FX "second part"]
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.algebra S
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (AdjoinRoot f) = of f :=
rfl
variable (S) in
theorem algebraMap_eq' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] :
algebraMap S (AdjoinRoot f) = (of f).comp (algebraMap S R) :=
rfl
theorem finiteType : Algebra.FiniteType R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FiniteType.polynomial R).of_surjective _ (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _)
theorem finitePresentation : Algebra.FinitePresentation R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FinitePresentation.polynomial R).quotient (Submodule.fg_span_singleton f)
/-- The adjoined root. -/
def root : AdjoinRoot f :=
mk f X
variable {f}
instance hasCoeT : CoeTC R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨of f⟩
/-- Two `R`-`AlgHom` from `AdjoinRoot f` to the same `R`-algebra are the same iff
they agree on `root f`. -/
@[ext]
theorem algHom_ext [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {g₁ g₂ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S}
(h : g₁ (root f) = g₂ (root f)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext R <| Polynomial.algHom_ext h
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {g h : R[X]} : mk f g = mk f h ↔ f ∣ g - h :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq.trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {g : R[X]} : mk f g = 0 ↔ f ∣ g :=
mk_eq_mk.trans <| by rw [sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem mk_self : mk f f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr (mem_span_singleton.2 <| by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mk_C (x : R) : mk f (C x) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X : mk f X = root f :=
rfl
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0) (hd : degree g < degree f) :
mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_degree_lt h0 hd
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0)
(hd : natDegree g < natDegree f) : mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt h0 hd
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (p : R[X]) : aeval (root f) p = mk f p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p
(fun x => by
rw [aeval_C]
rfl)
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [map_mul, aeval_C, map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, mk_C, RingHom.map_pow, mk_X]
rfl
theorem adjoinRoot_eq_top : Algebra.adjoin R ({root f} : Set (AdjoinRoot f)) = ⊤ := by
refine Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => ?_
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on with
| ih p => exact (Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval R (root f)).symm ▸ ⟨p, aeval_eq p⟩
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_root (f : R[X]) : f.eval₂ (of f) (root f) = 0 := by
rw [← algebraMap_eq, ← aeval_def, aeval_eq, mk_self]
theorem isRoot_root (f : R[X]) : IsRoot (f.map (of f)) (root f) := by
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_root]
theorem isAlgebraic_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : IsAlgebraic R (root f) :=
⟨f, hf, eval₂_root f⟩
theorem of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero [IsDomain R] (hf : f.degree ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (AdjoinRoot.of f) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro p hp
rw [AdjoinRoot.of, RingHom.comp_apply, AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero] at hp
by_cases h : f = 0
· exact C_eq_zero.mp (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (by rwa [h] at hp))
· contrapose! hf with h_contra
rw [← degree_C h_contra]
apply le_antisymm (degree_le_of_dvd hp (by rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero])) _
rwa [degree_C h_contra, zero_le_degree_iff]
variable [CommRing S]
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism `i : R →+* S` to `AdjoinRoot f →+* S`. -/
def lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →+* S := by
apply Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval₂RingHom i x)
intro g H
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 H with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [hy, RingHom.map_mul, coe_eval₂RingHom, h, zero_mul]
variable {i : R →+* S} {a : S} (h : f.eval₂ i a = 0)
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (g : R[X]) : lift i a h (mk f g) = g.eval₂ i a :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_root : lift i a h (root f) = a := by rw [root, lift_mk, eval₂_X]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {x : R} : lift i a h x = i x := by rw [← mk_C x, lift_mk, eval₂_C]
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of : (lift i a h).comp (of f) = i :=
RingHom.ext fun _ => @lift_of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h _
variable (f) [Algebra R S]
/-- Produce an algebra homomorphism `AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S` sending `root f` to
a root of `f` in `S`. -/
def liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S :=
{ lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx with
commutes' := fun r => show lift _ _ hfx r = _ from lift_of hfx }
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) :
(liftHom f x hfx : AdjoinRoot f →+* S) = lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem aeval_algHom_eq_zero (ϕ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S) : aeval (ϕ (root f)) f = 0 := by
have h : ϕ.toRingHom.comp (of f) = algebraMap R S := RingHom.ext_iff.mpr ϕ.commutes
rw [aeval_def, ← h, ← RingHom.map_zero ϕ.toRingHom, ← eval₂_root f, hom_eval₂]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_eq_algHom (f : R[X]) (ϕ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S) :
liftHom f (ϕ (root f)) (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ) = ϕ := by
suffices AlgHom.equalizer ϕ (liftHom f (ϕ (root f)) (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ)) = ⊤ by
exact (AlgHom.ext fun x => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp this x).mpr Algebra.mem_top).symm
rw [eq_top_iff, ← adjoinRoot_eq_top, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact (@lift_root _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (aeval_algHom_eq_zero f ϕ)).symm
variable (hfx : aeval a f = 0)
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_mk {g : R[X]} : liftHom f a hfx (mk f g) = aeval a g :=
lift_mk hfx g
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_root : liftHom f a hfx (root f) = a :=
lift_root hfx
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_of {x : R} : liftHom f a hfx (of f x) = algebraMap _ _ x :=
lift_of hfx
section AdjoinInv
@[simp]
theorem root_isInv (r : R) : of _ r * root (C r * X - 1) = 1 := by
convert sub_eq_zero.1 ((eval₂_sub _).symm.trans <| eval₂_root <| C r * X - 1) <;>
simp only [eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_X, eval₂_one]
theorem algHom_subsingleton {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] {r : R} :
Subsingleton (AdjoinRoot (C r * X - 1) →ₐ[R] S) :=
⟨fun f g =>
algHom_ext
(@inv_unique _ _ (algebraMap R S r) _ _
(by rw [← f.commutes, ← map_mul, algebraMap_eq, root_isInv, map_one])
(by rw [← g.commutes, ← map_mul, algebraMap_eq, root_isInv, map_one]))⟩
end AdjoinInv
section Prime
variable {f}
theorem isDomain_of_prime (hf : Prime f) : IsDomain (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Ideal.Quotient.isDomain_iff_prime (span {f} : Ideal R[X])).mpr <|
(Ideal.span_singleton_prime hf.ne_zero).mpr hf
theorem noZeroSMulDivisors_of_prime_of_degree_ne_zero [IsDomain R] (hf : Prime f)
(hf' : f.degree ≠ 0) : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
haveI := isDomain_of_prime hf
NoZeroSMulDivisors.iff_algebraMap_injective.mpr (of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero hf')
end Prime
end CommRing
section Irreducible
variable [Field K] {f : K[X]}
instance span_maximal_of_irreducible [Fact (Irreducible f)] : (span {f}).IsMaximal :=
PrincipalIdealRing.isMaximal_of_irreducible <| Fact.out
noncomputable instance instGroupWithZero [Fact (Irreducible f)] : GroupWithZero (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Quotient.groupWithZero (span {f} : Ideal K[X])
/-- If `R` is a field and `f` is irreducible, then `AdjoinRoot f` is a field -/
@[stacks 09FX "first part, see also 09FI"]
noncomputable instance instField [Fact (Irreducible f)] : Field (AdjoinRoot f) where
__ := instCommRing _
__ := instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def q := by
rw [← map_natCast (of f), ← map_natCast (of f), ← map_div₀, ← NNRat.cast_def]; rfl
ratCast_def q := by
rw [← map_natCast (of f), ← map_intCast (of f), ← map_div₀, ← Rat.cast_def]; rfl
nnqsmul_def q x :=
AdjoinRoot.induction_on f (C := fun y ↦ q • y = (of f) q * y) x fun p ↦ by
simp only [smul_mk, of, RingHom.comp_apply, ← (mk f).map_mul, Polynomial.nnqsmul_eq_C_mul]
qsmul_def q x :=
-- Porting note: I gave the explicit motive and changed `rw` to `simp`.
AdjoinRoot.induction_on f (C := fun y ↦ q • y = (of f) q * y) x fun p ↦ by
simp only [smul_mk, of, RingHom.comp_apply, ← (mk f).map_mul, Polynomial.qsmul_eq_C_mul]
theorem coe_injective (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Function.Injective ((↑) : K → AdjoinRoot f) :=
have := AdjoinRoot.nontrivial f h
(of f).injective
theorem coe_injective' [Fact (Irreducible f)] : Function.Injective ((↑) : K → AdjoinRoot f) :=
(of f).injective
variable (f)
theorem mul_div_root_cancel [Fact (Irreducible f)] :
(X - C (root f)) * ((f.map (of f)) / (X - C (root f))) = f.map (of f) :=
mul_div_eq_iff_isRoot.2 <| isRoot_root _
end Irreducible
section IsNoetherianRing
instance [CommRing R] [IsNoetherianRing R] {f : R[X]} : IsNoetherianRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isNoetherianRing _
end IsNoetherianRing
section PowerBasis
variable [CommRing R] {g : R[X]}
theorem isIntegral_root' (hg : g.Monic) : IsIntegral R (root g) :=
⟨g, hg, eval₂_root g⟩
/-- `AdjoinRoot.modByMonicHom` sends the equivalence class of `f` mod `g` to `f %ₘ g`.
This is a well-defined right inverse to `AdjoinRoot.mk`, see `AdjoinRoot.mk_leftInverse`. -/
def modByMonicHom (hg : g.Monic) : AdjoinRoot g →ₗ[R] R[X] :=
(Submodule.liftQ _ (Polynomial.modByMonicHom g)
fun f (hf : f ∈ (Ideal.span {g}).restrictScalars R) =>
(mem_ker_modByMonic hg).mpr (Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mp hf)).comp <|
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv R (Ideal.span {g} : Ideal R[X])).symm.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem modByMonicHom_mk (hg : g.Monic) (f : R[X]) : modByMonicHom hg (mk g f) = f %ₘ g :=
rfl
theorem mk_leftInverse (hg : g.Monic) : Function.LeftInverse (mk g) (modByMonicHom hg) := by
intro f
induction f using AdjoinRoot.induction_on
rw [modByMonicHom_mk hg, mk_eq_mk, modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hg, sub_sub_cancel_left,
dvd_neg]
apply dvd_mul_right
theorem mk_surjective : Function.Surjective (mk g) :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
/-- The elements `1, root g, ..., root g ^ (d - 1)` form a basis for `AdjoinRoot g`,
where `g` is a monic polynomial of degree `d`. -/
def powerBasisAux' (hg : g.Monic) : Basis (Fin g.natDegree) R (AdjoinRoot g) :=
Basis.ofEquivFun
{ toFun := fun f i => (modByMonicHom hg f).coeff i
invFun := fun c => mk g <| ∑ i : Fin g.natDegree, monomial i (c i)
map_add' := fun f₁ f₂ =>
funext fun i => by simp only [(modByMonicHom hg).map_add, coeff_add, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun f₁ f₂ =>
funext fun i => by
simp only [(modByMonicHom hg).map_smul, coeff_smul, Pi.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
-- Porting note: another proof that I converted to tactic mode
left_inv := by
intro f
induction f using AdjoinRoot.induction_on
simp only [modByMonicHom_mk, sum_modByMonic_coeff hg degree_le_natDegree]
refine (mk_eq_mk.mpr ?_).symm
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hg, sub_sub_cancel]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
right_inv := fun x =>
funext fun i => by
nontriviality R
simp only [modByMonicHom_mk]
rw [(modByMonic_eq_self_iff hg).mpr, finset_sum_coeff]
· simp_rw [coeff_monomial, Fin.val_eq_val, Finset.sum_ite_eq', if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _)]
· simp_rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact (degree_eq_natDegree <| hg.ne_zero).symm ▸ degree_sum_fin_lt _ }
-- This lemma could be autogenerated by `@[simps]` but unfortunately that would require
-- unfolding that causes a timeout.
-- This lemma should have the simp tag but this causes a lint issue.
theorem powerBasisAux'_repr_symm_apply (hg : g.Monic) (c : Fin g.natDegree →₀ R) :
(powerBasisAux' hg).repr.symm c = mk g (∑ i : Fin _, monomial i (c i)) :=
rfl
-- This lemma could be autogenerated by `@[simps]` but unfortunately that would require
-- unfolding that causes a timeout.
@[simp]
theorem powerBasisAux'_repr_apply_to_fun (hg : g.Monic) (f : AdjoinRoot g) (i : Fin g.natDegree) :
(powerBasisAux' hg).repr f i = (modByMonicHom hg f).coeff ↑i :=
rfl
/-- The power basis `1, root g, ..., root g ^ (d - 1)` for `AdjoinRoot g`,
where `g` is a monic polynomial of degree `d`. -/
@[simps]
def powerBasis' (hg : g.Monic) : PowerBasis R (AdjoinRoot g) where
gen := root g
dim := g.natDegree
basis := powerBasisAux' hg
basis_eq_pow i := by
simp only [powerBasisAux', Basis.coe_ofEquivFun, LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_same, monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow, (mk g).map_pow, mk_X]
· intro j _ hj
rw [← monomial_zero_right _, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hj]
-- Fix `DecidableEq` mismatch
· intros
have := Finset.mem_univ i
contradiction
lemma _root_.Polynomial.Monic.free_adjoinRoot (hg : g.Monic) : Module.Free R (AdjoinRoot g) :=
.of_basis (powerBasis' hg).basis
lemma _root_.Polynomial.Monic.finite_adjoinRoot (hg : g.Monic) : Module.Finite R (AdjoinRoot g) :=
.of_basis (powerBasis' hg).basis
/-- An unwrapped version of `AdjoinRoot.free_of_monic` for better discoverability. -/
lemma _root_.Polynomial.Monic.free_quotient (hg : g.Monic) :
Module.Free R (R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {g}) :=
hg.free_adjoinRoot
/-- An unwrapped version of `AdjoinRoot.finite_of_monic` for better discoverability. -/
lemma _root_.Polynomial.Monic.finite_quotient (hg : g.Monic) :
Module.Finite R (R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {g}) :=
hg.finite_adjoinRoot
variable [Field K] {f : K[X]}
theorem isIntegral_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : IsIntegral K (root f) :=
(isAlgebraic_root hf).isIntegral
theorem minpoly_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : minpoly K (root f) = f * C f.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
have f'_monic : Monic _ := monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hf
refine (minpoly.unique K _ f'_monic ?_ ?_).symm
· rw [map_mul, aeval_eq, mk_self, zero_mul]
intro q q_monic q_aeval
have commutes : (lift (algebraMap K (AdjoinRoot f)) (root f) q_aeval).comp (mk q) = mk f := by
ext
· simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, mk_C, lift_of]
rfl
· simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, mk_X, lift_root]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree f'_monic.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree q_monic.ne_zero,
Nat.cast_le, natDegree_mul hf, natDegree_C, add_zero]
· apply natDegree_le_of_dvd
· have : mk f q = 0 := by rw [← commutes, RingHom.comp_apply, mk_self, RingHom.map_zero]
exact mk_eq_zero.1 this
· exact q_monic.ne_zero
· rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
/-- The elements `1, root f, ..., root f ^ (d - 1)` form a basis for `AdjoinRoot f`,
where `f` is an irreducible polynomial over a field of degree `d`. -/
def powerBasisAux (hf : f ≠ 0) : Basis (Fin f.natDegree) K (AdjoinRoot f) := by
let f' := f * C f.leadingCoeff⁻¹
have deg_f' : f'.natDegree = f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul hf, natDegree_C, add_zero]
· rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
have minpoly_eq : minpoly K (root f) = f' := minpoly_root hf
apply Basis.mk (v := fun i : Fin f.natDegree ↦ root f ^ i.val)
· rw [← deg_f', ← minpoly_eq]
exact linearIndependent_pow (root f)
· rintro y -
rw [← deg_f', ← minpoly_eq]
apply (isIntegral_root hf).mem_span_pow
obtain ⟨g⟩ := y
use g
rw [aeval_eq]
rfl
/-- The power basis `1, root f, ..., root f ^ (d - 1)` for `AdjoinRoot f`,
where `f` is an irreducible polynomial over a field of degree `d`. -/
@[simps!]
def powerBasis (hf : f ≠ 0) : PowerBasis K (AdjoinRoot f) where
gen := root f
dim := f.natDegree
basis := powerBasisAux hf
basis_eq_pow := by simp [powerBasisAux]
theorem minpoly_powerBasis_gen (hf : f ≠ 0) :
minpoly K (powerBasis hf).gen = f * C f.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
rw [powerBasis_gen, minpoly_root hf]
theorem minpoly_powerBasis_gen_of_monic (hf : f.Monic) (hf' : f ≠ 0 := hf.ne_zero) :
minpoly K (powerBasis hf').gen = f := by
rw [minpoly_powerBasis_gen hf', hf.leadingCoeff, inv_one, C.map_one, mul_one]
end PowerBasis
section Equiv
section minpoly
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (x : S) (R)
open Algebra Polynomial
/-- The surjective algebra morphism `R[X]/(minpoly R x) → R[x]`.
If `R` is a integrally closed domain and `x` is integral, this is an isomorphism,
see `minpoly.equivAdjoin`. -/
@[simps!]
def Minpoly.toAdjoin : AdjoinRoot (minpoly R x) →ₐ[R] adjoin R ({x} : Set S) :=
liftHom _ ⟨x, self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x⟩
(by simp [← Subalgebra.coe_eq_zero, aeval_subalgebra_coe])
variable {R x}
theorem Minpoly.toAdjoin_apply' (a : AdjoinRoot (minpoly R x)) :
Minpoly.toAdjoin R x a =
liftHom (minpoly R x) (⟨x, self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x⟩ : adjoin R ({x} : Set S))
(by simp [← Subalgebra.coe_eq_zero, aeval_subalgebra_coe]) a :=
rfl
theorem Minpoly.toAdjoin.apply_X :
Minpoly.toAdjoin R x (mk (minpoly R x) X) = ⟨x, self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x⟩ := by
simp [toAdjoin]
variable (R x)
theorem Minpoly.toAdjoin.surjective : Function.Surjective (Minpoly.toAdjoin R x) := by
rw [← AlgHom.range_eq_top, _root_.eq_top_iff, ← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage]
exact adjoin_le fun ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ h ↦ ⟨mk (minpoly R x) X, by simpa [toAdjoin] using h.symm⟩
end minpoly
section Equiv'
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
variable (g : R[X]) (pb : PowerBasis R S)
/-- If `S` is an extension of `R` with power basis `pb` and `g` is a monic polynomial over `R`
such that `pb.gen` has a minimal polynomial `g`, then `S` is isomorphic to `AdjoinRoot g`.
Compare `PowerBasis.equivOfRoot`, which would require
`h₂ : aeval pb.gen (minpoly R (root g)) = 0`; that minimal polynomial is not
guaranteed to be identical to `g`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def equiv' (h₁ : aeval (root g) (minpoly R pb.gen) = 0) (h₂ : aeval pb.gen g = 0) :
AdjoinRoot g ≃ₐ[R] S :=
{ AdjoinRoot.liftHom g pb.gen h₂ with
toFun := AdjoinRoot.liftHom g pb.gen h₂
invFun := pb.lift (root g) h₁
-- Porting note: another term-mode proof converted to tactic-mode.
left_inv := fun x => by
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on
rw [liftHom_mk, pb.lift_aeval, aeval_eq]
right_inv := fun x => by
nontriviality S
obtain ⟨f, _hf, rfl⟩ := pb.exists_eq_aeval x
rw [pb.lift_aeval, aeval_eq, liftHom_mk] }
-- This lemma should have the simp tag but this causes a lint issue.
theorem equiv'_toAlgHom (h₁ : aeval (root g) (minpoly R pb.gen) = 0) (h₂ : aeval pb.gen g = 0) :
(equiv' g pb h₁ h₂).toAlgHom = AdjoinRoot.liftHom g pb.gen h₂ :=
rfl
-- This lemma should have the simp tag but this causes a lint issue.
theorem equiv'_symm_toAlgHom (h₁ : aeval (root g) (minpoly R pb.gen) = 0)
(h₂ : aeval pb.gen g = 0) : (equiv' g pb h₁ h₂).symm.toAlgHom = pb.lift (root g) h₁ :=
rfl
end Equiv'
section Field
variable (L F : Type*) [Field F] [CommRing L] [IsDomain L] [Algebra F L]
/-- If `L` is a field extension of `F` and `f` is a polynomial over `F` then the set
of maps from `F[x]/(f)` into `L` is in bijection with the set of roots of `f` in `L`. -/
def equiv (f : F[X]) (hf : f ≠ 0) :
(AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[F] L) ≃ { x // x ∈ f.aroots L } :=
(powerBasis hf).liftEquiv'.trans
| ((Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv fun x => by
rw [powerBasis_gen, minpoly_root hf, aroots_mul, aroots_C, add_zero, Equiv.refl_apply]
exact (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hf).ne_zero)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 633 | 635 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ToNat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Finite Cardinality Functions
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`.
* `ENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `ENat.card α = ⊤`.
* `PartENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number
(using the legacy definition `PartENat := Part ℕ`). If `α` is infinite, `PartENat.card α = ⊤`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Cardinal Function
noncomputable section
variable {α β : Type*}
universe u v
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`. -/
protected def card (α : Type*) : ℕ :=
toNat (mk α)
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_fintype_card [Fintype α] : Nat.card α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card
/-- Because this theorem takes `Fintype α` as a non-instance argument, it can be used in particular
when `Fintype.card` ends up with different instance than the one found by inference -/
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_eq_nat_card {_ : Fintype α} : Fintype.card α = Nat.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card.symm
lemma card_eq_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : Nat.card s = s.card := by
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
lemma card_eq_card_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Nat.card s = s.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, s.mem_toFinset]
lemma card_eq_card_finite_toFinset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card s = hs.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, hs.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem card_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Nat.card α = 0 := by simp [Nat.card]
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite α] : Nat.card α = 0 := mk_toNat_of_infinite
lemma cast_card [Finite α] : (Nat.card α : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk α := by
rw [Nat.card, Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0]
exact Cardinal.lt_aleph0_of_finite _
lemma _root_.Set.Infinite.card_eq_zero {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : Nat.card s = 0 :=
@card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype
lemma card_eq_zero : Nat.card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Infinite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
lemma card_ne_zero : Nat.card α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by simp [card_eq_zero, not_or]
lemma card_pos_iff : 0 < Nat.card α ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, mk_lt_aleph0_iff]
@[simp] lemma card_pos [Nonempty α] [Finite α] : 0 < Nat.card α := card_pos_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
theorem finite_of_card_ne_zero (h : Nat.card α ≠ 0) : Finite α := (card_ne_zero.1 h).2
theorem card_congr (f : α ≃ β) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr f
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite β] (f : α → β)
(hf : Injective f) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β := by
simpa using toNat_le_toNat (lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective hf) (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
lemma card_le_card_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite α] (f : α → β)
(hf : Surjective f) : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α := by
have : lift.{u} #β ≤ lift.{v} #α := mk_le_of_surjective (ULift.map_surjective.2 hf)
simpa using toNat_le_toNat this (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Bijective f) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
protected theorem bijective_iff_injective_and_card [Finite β] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Injective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
rw [Bijective, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite β
have := Fintype.ofInjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, ← Bijective,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card]
protected theorem bijective_iff_surjective_and_card [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Surjective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
classical
rw [_root_.and_comm, Bijective, and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofSurjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_left_iff, ← Bijective, ← and_comm,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite β] {f : α → β}
(inj : Injective f) (hc : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_injective_and_card f).mpr
⟨inj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_injective f inj) |>.symm⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite α] {f : α → β}
(surj : Surjective f) (hc : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card f).mpr
⟨surj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_surjective f surj)⟩
|
theorem card_eq_of_equiv_fin {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (f : α ≃ Fin n) : Nat.card α = n := by
simpa only [card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_fin] using card_congr f
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Finite.lean | 127 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
| ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 179 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
/-!
# Cardinality of continuum
In this file we define `Cardinal.continuum` (notation: `𝔠`, localized in `Cardinal`) to be `2 ^ ℵ₀`.
We also prove some `simp` lemmas about cardinal arithmetic involving `𝔠`.
## Notation
- `𝔠` : notation for `Cardinal.continuum` in locale `Cardinal`.
-/
namespace Cardinal
universe u v
open Cardinal
/-- Cardinality of the continuum. -/
def continuum : Cardinal.{u} :=
2 ^ ℵ₀
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "𝔠" => Cardinal.continuum
@[simp]
theorem two_power_aleph0 : 2 ^ ℵ₀ = 𝔠 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_continuum : lift.{v} 𝔠 = 𝔠 := by
rw [← two_power_aleph0, lift_two_power, lift_aleph0, two_power_aleph0]
@[simp]
theorem continuum_le_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : 𝔠 ≤ lift.{v} c ↔ 𝔠 ≤ c := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_le_continuum {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c ≤ 𝔠 ↔ c ≤ 𝔠 := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem continuum_lt_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : 𝔠 < lift.{v} c ↔ 𝔠 < c := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_lt]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt_continuum {c : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c < 𝔠 ↔ c < 𝔠 := by
rw [← lift_continuum.{v, u}, lift_lt]
/-!
### Inequalities
-/
theorem aleph0_lt_continuum : ℵ₀ < 𝔠 :=
cantor ℵ₀
theorem aleph0_le_continuum : ℵ₀ ≤ 𝔠 :=
aleph0_lt_continuum.le
@[simp]
theorem beth_one : ℶ_ 1 = 𝔠 := by simpa using beth_succ 0
theorem nat_lt_continuum (n : ℕ) : ↑n < 𝔠 :=
(nat_lt_aleph0 n).trans aleph0_lt_continuum
theorem mk_set_nat : #(Set ℕ) = 𝔠 := by simp
theorem continuum_pos : 0 < 𝔠 :=
nat_lt_continuum 0
theorem continuum_ne_zero : 𝔠 ≠ 0 :=
continuum_pos.ne'
theorem aleph_one_le_continuum : ℵ₁ ≤ 𝔠 := by
rw [← succ_aleph0]
exact Order.succ_le_of_lt aleph0_lt_continuum
@[simp]
theorem continuum_toNat : toNat continuum = 0 :=
toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le aleph0_le_continuum
@[simp]
theorem continuum_toENat : toENat continuum = ⊤ :=
(toENat_eq_top.2 aleph0_le_continuum)
/-!
### Addition
-/
|
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_continuum : ℵ₀ + 𝔠 = 𝔠 :=
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Continuum.lean | 97 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
/-!
# Equalizers and coequalizers
This file defines (co)equalizers as special cases of (co)limits.
An equalizer is the categorical generalization of the subobject {a ∈ A | f(a) = g(a)} known
from abelian groups or modules. It is a limit cone over the diagram formed by `f` and `g`.
A coequalizer is the dual concept.
## Main definitions
* `WalkingParallelPair` is the indexing category used for (co)equalizer_diagrams
* `parallelPair` is a functor from `WalkingParallelPair` to our category `C`.
* a `fork` is a cone over a parallel pair.
* there is really only one interesting morphism in a fork: the arrow from the vertex of the fork
to the domain of f and g. It is called `fork.ι`.
* an `equalizer` is now just a `limit (parallelPair f g)`
Each of these has a dual.
## Main statements
* `equalizer.ι_mono` states that every equalizer map is a monomorphism
* `isIso_limit_cone_parallelPair_of_self` states that the identity on the domain of `f` is an
equalizer of `f` and `f`.
## Implementation notes
As with the other special shapes in the limits library, all the definitions here are given as
`abbreviation`s of the general statements for limits, so all the `simp` lemmas and theorems about
general limits can be used.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 1*][borceux-vol1]
-/
section
open CategoryTheory Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v v₂ u u₂
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a (co)equalizer. -/
inductive WalkingParallelPair : Type
| zero
| one
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open WalkingParallelPair
-- Don't generate unnecessary `sizeOf_spec` lemma which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- The type family of morphisms for the diagram indexing a (co)equalizer. -/
inductive WalkingParallelPairHom : WalkingParallelPair → WalkingParallelPair → Type
| left : WalkingParallelPairHom zero one
| right : WalkingParallelPairHom zero one
| id (X : WalkingParallelPair) : WalkingParallelPairHom X X
deriving DecidableEq
/-- Satisfying the inhabited linter -/
instance : Inhabited (WalkingParallelPairHom zero one) where default := WalkingParallelPairHom.left
open WalkingParallelPairHom
/-- Composition of morphisms in the indexing diagram for (co)equalizers. -/
def WalkingParallelPairHom.comp :
-- Porting note: changed X Y Z to implicit to match comp fields in precategory
∀ {X Y Z : WalkingParallelPair} (_ : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y)
(_ : WalkingParallelPairHom Y Z), WalkingParallelPairHom X Z
| _, _, _, id _, h => h
| _, _, _, left, id one => left
| _, _, _, right, id one => right
-- Porting note: adding these since they are simple and aesop couldn't directly prove them
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.id_comp
{X Y : WalkingParallelPair} (g : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) : comp (id X) g = g :=
rfl
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.comp_id
{X Y : WalkingParallelPair} (f : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) : comp f (id Y) = f := by
cases f <;> rfl
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.assoc {X Y Z W : WalkingParallelPair}
(f : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) (g : WalkingParallelPairHom Y Z)
(h : WalkingParallelPairHom Z W) : comp (comp f g) h = comp f (comp g h) := by
cases f <;> cases g <;> cases h <;> rfl
instance walkingParallelPairHomCategory : SmallCategory WalkingParallelPair where
Hom := WalkingParallelPairHom
id := id
comp := comp
comp_id := comp_id
id_comp := id_comp
assoc := assoc
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairHom_id (X : WalkingParallelPair) : WalkingParallelPairHom.id X = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
/-- The functor `WalkingParallelPair ⥤ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ` sending left to left and right to
right.
-/
def walkingParallelPairOp : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ where
obj x := op <| by cases x; exacts [one, zero]
map f := by
cases f <;> apply Quiver.Hom.op
exacts [left, right, WalkingParallelPairHom.id _]
map_comp := by rintro _ _ _ (_|_|_) g <;> cases g <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_zero : walkingParallelPairOp.obj zero = op one := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_one : walkingParallelPairOp.obj one = op zero := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_left :
walkingParallelPairOp.map left = @Quiver.Hom.op _ _ zero one left := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_right :
walkingParallelPairOp.map right = @Quiver.Hom.op _ _ zero one right := rfl
/--
The equivalence `WalkingParallelPair ⥤ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ` sending left to left and right to
right.
-/
@[simps functor inverse]
def walkingParallelPairOpEquiv : WalkingParallelPair ≌ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ where
functor := walkingParallelPairOp
inverse := walkingParallelPairOp.leftOp
unitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso (by cases j <;> rfl))
(by rintro _ _ (_ | _ | _) <;> simp)
counitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso (by
induction' j with X
cases X <;> rfl))
(fun {i} {j} f => by
induction' i with i
induction' j with j
let g := f.unop
have : f = g.op := rfl
rw [this]
cases i <;> cases j <;> cases g <;> rfl)
functor_unitIso_comp := fun j => by cases j <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_zero :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.unitIso.app zero = Iso.refl zero := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_one :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.unitIso.app one = Iso.refl one := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_zero :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.counitIso.app (op zero) = Iso.refl (op zero) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_one :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.counitIso.app (op one) = Iso.refl (op one) :=
rfl
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : C}
/-- `parallelPair f g` is the diagram in `C` consisting of the two morphisms `f` and `g` with
common domain and codomain. -/
def parallelPair (f g : X ⟶ Y) : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C where
obj x :=
match x with
| zero => X
| one => Y
map h :=
match h with
| WalkingParallelPairHom.id _ => 𝟙 _
| left => f
| right => g
-- `sorry` can cope with this, but it's too slow:
map_comp := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨⟩ g <;> cases g <;> {dsimp; simp}
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_obj_zero (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).obj zero = X := rfl
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_obj_one (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).obj one = Y := rfl
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_map_left (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).map left = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_map_right (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).map right = g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_functor_obj {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)).obj j = F.obj j := by cases j <;> rfl
/-- Every functor indexing a (co)equalizer is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a
`parallelPair` -/
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoParallelPair (F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso <| by cases j <;> rfl) (by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> simp)
/-- Construct a morphism between parallel pairs. -/
def parallelPairHom {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g' where
app j :=
match j with
| zero => p
| one => q
naturality := by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩ <;> {dsimp; simp [wf,wg]}
@[simp]
theorem parallelPairHom_app_zero {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X')
(q : Y ⟶ Y') (wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') :
(parallelPairHom f g f' g' p q wf wg).app zero = p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem parallelPairHom_app_one {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X')
(q : Y ⟶ Y') (wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') :
(parallelPairHom f g f' g' p q wf wg).app one = q :=
rfl
/-- Construct a natural isomorphism between functors out of the walking parallel pair from
its components. -/
@[simps!]
def parallelPair.ext {F G : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (zero : F.obj zero ≅ G.obj zero)
(one : F.obj one ≅ G.obj one) (left : F.map left ≫ one.hom = zero.hom ≫ G.map left)
(right : F.map right ≫ one.hom = zero.hom ≫ G.map right) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by
rintro ⟨j⟩
exacts [zero, one])
(by rintro _ _ ⟨_⟩ <;> simp [left, right])
/-- Construct a natural isomorphism between `parallelPair f g` and `parallelPair f' g'` given
equalities `f = f'` and `g = g'`. -/
@[simps!]
def parallelPair.eqOfHomEq {f g f' g' : X ⟶ Y} (hf : f = f') (hg : g = g') :
parallelPair f g ≅ parallelPair f' g' :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simp [hf]) (by simp [hg])
/-- A fork on `f` and `g` is just a `Cone (parallelPair f g)`. -/
abbrev Fork (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
Cone (parallelPair f g)
/-- A cofork on `f` and `g` is just a `Cocone (parallelPair f g)`. -/
abbrev Cofork (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
Cocone (parallelPair f g)
variable {f g : X ⟶ Y}
/-- A fork `t` on the parallel pair `f g : X ⟶ Y` consists of two morphisms
`t.π.app zero : t.pt ⟶ X`
and `t.π.app one : t.pt ⟶ Y`. Of these, only the first one is interesting, and we give it the
shorter name `Fork.ι t`. -/
def Fork.ι (t : Fork f g) :=
t.π.app zero
@[simp]
theorem Fork.app_zero_eq_ι (t : Fork f g) : t.π.app zero = t.ι :=
rfl
/-- A cofork `t` on the parallelPair `f g : X ⟶ Y` consists of two morphisms
`t.ι.app zero : X ⟶ t.pt` and `t.ι.app one : Y ⟶ t.pt`. Of these, only the second one is
interesting, and we give it the shorter name `Cofork.π t`. -/
def Cofork.π (t : Cofork f g) :=
t.ι.app one
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.app_one_eq_π (t : Cofork f g) : t.ι.app one = t.π :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left (s : Fork f g) : s.π.app one = s.ι ≫ f := by
rw [← s.app_zero_eq_ι, ← s.w left, parallelPair_map_left]
@[reassoc]
theorem Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right (s : Fork f g) : s.π.app one = s.ι ≫ g := by
rw [← s.app_zero_eq_ι, ← s.w right, parallelPair_map_right]
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left (s : Cofork f g) : s.ι.app zero = f ≫ s.π := by
rw [← s.app_one_eq_π, ← s.w left, parallelPair_map_left]
@[reassoc]
theorem Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right (s : Cofork f g) : s.ι.app zero = g ≫ s.π := by
rw [← s.app_one_eq_π, ← s.w right, parallelPair_map_right]
/-- A fork on `f g : X ⟶ Y` is determined by the morphism `ι : P ⟶ X` satisfying `ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g`.
-/
@[simps]
def Fork.ofι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) : Fork f g where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun X => by
cases X
· exact ι
· exact ι ≫ f
naturality := fun {X} {Y} f =>
by cases X <;> cases Y <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp; assumption }
/-- A cofork on `f g : X ⟶ Y` is determined by the morphism `π : Y ⟶ P` satisfying
`f ≫ π = g ≫ π`. -/
@[simps]
def Cofork.ofπ {P : C} (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = g ≫ π) : Cofork f g where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun X => WalkingParallelPair.casesOn X (f ≫ π) π
naturality := fun i j f => by cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [w] }
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ι_ofι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) : (Fork.ofι ι w).ι = ι :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.π_ofπ {P : C} (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = g ≫ π) : (Cofork.ofπ π w).π = π :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Fork.condition (t : Fork f g) : t.ι ≫ f = t.ι ≫ g := by
rw [← t.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left, ← t.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Cofork.condition (t : Cofork f g) : f ≫ t.π = g ≫ t.π := by
rw [← t.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left, ← t.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right]
/-- To check whether two maps are equalized by both maps of a fork, it suffices to check it for the
first map -/
theorem Fork.equalizer_ext (s : Fork f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ s.pt} (h : k ≫ s.ι = l ≫ s.ι) :
∀ j : WalkingParallelPair, k ≫ s.π.app j = l ≫ s.π.app j
| zero => h
| one => by
have : k ≫ ι s ≫ f = l ≫ ι s ≫ f := by
simp only [← Category.assoc]; exact congrArg (· ≫ f) h
rw [s.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left, this]
/-- To check whether two maps are coequalized by both maps of a cofork, it suffices to check it for
the second map -/
theorem Cofork.coequalizer_ext (s : Cofork f g) {W : C} {k l : s.pt ⟶ W}
(h : Cofork.π s ≫ k = Cofork.π s ≫ l) : ∀ j : WalkingParallelPair, s.ι.app j ≫ k = s.ι.app j ≫ l
| zero => by simp only [s.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left, Category.assoc, h]
| one => h
theorem Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h : k ≫ Fork.ι s = l ≫ Fork.ι s) : k = l :=
hs.hom_ext <| Fork.equalizer_ext _ h
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} {k l : s.pt ⟶ W}
(h : Cofork.π s ≫ k = Cofork.π s ≫ l) : k = l :=
hs.hom_ext <| Cofork.coequalizer_ext _ h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι {s t : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) : hs.lift t ≫ s.ι = t.ι :=
hs.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc {s t : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) : s.π ≫ hs.desc t = t.π :=
hs.fac _ _
-- Porting note: `Fork.IsLimit.lift` was added in order to ease the port
/-- If `s` is a limit fork over `f` and `g`, then a morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying
`k ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.pt` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def Fork.IsLimit.lift {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
W ⟶ s.pt :=
hs.lift (Fork.ofι _ h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι' {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
Fork.IsLimit.lift hs k h ≫ Fork.ι s = k :=
hs.fac _ _
/-- If `s` is a limit fork over `f` and `g`, then a morphism `k : W ⟶ X` satisfying
`k ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.pt` such that `l ≫ fork.ι s = k`. -/
def Fork.IsLimit.lift' {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
{ l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨Fork.IsLimit.lift hs k h, by simp⟩
-- Porting note: `Cofork.IsColimit.desc` was added in order to ease the port
/-- If `s` is a colimit cofork over `f` and `g`, then a morphism `k : Y ⟶ W` satisfying
`f ≫ k = g ≫ k` induces a morphism `l : s.pt ⟶ W` such that `cofork.π s ≫ l = k`. -/
def Cofork.IsColimit.desc {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : s.pt ⟶ W :=
hs.desc (Cofork.ofπ _ h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc' {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : Cofork.π s ≫ Cofork.IsColimit.desc hs k h = k :=
hs.fac _ _
/-- If `s` is a colimit cofork over `f` and `g`, then a morphism `k : Y ⟶ W` satisfying
`f ≫ k = g ≫ k` induces a morphism `l : s.pt ⟶ W` such that `cofork.π s ≫ l = k`. -/
def Cofork.IsColimit.desc' {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // Cofork.π s ≫ l = k } :=
⟨Cofork.IsColimit.desc hs k h, by simp⟩
theorem Fork.IsLimit.existsUnique {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) : ∃! l : W ⟶ s.pt, l ≫ Fork.ι s = k :=
⟨hs.lift <| Fork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _, fun _ hm =>
Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hs <| hm.symm ▸ (hs.fac (Fork.ofι _ h) WalkingParallelPair.zero).symm⟩
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.existsUnique {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : ∃! d : s.pt ⟶ W, Cofork.π s ≫ d = k :=
⟨hs.desc <| Cofork.ofπ _ h, hs.fac _ _, fun _ hm =>
Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hs <| hm.symm ▸ (hs.fac (Cofork.ofπ _ h) WalkingParallelPair.one).symm⟩
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
@[simps]
def Fork.IsLimit.mk (t : Fork f g) (lift : ∀ s : Fork f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : Fork f g, lift s ≫ Fork.ι t = Fork.ι s)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Fork f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j =>
WalkingParallelPair.casesOn j (fac s) <| by
erw [← s.w left, ← t.w left, ← Category.assoc, fac]; rfl
uniq := fun s m j => by aesop}
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def Fork.IsLimit.mk' {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (t : Fork f g)
(create : ∀ s : Fork f g, { l // l ≫ t.ι = s.ι ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.ι = s.ι → m = l }) : IsLimit t :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) fun s _ w => (create s).2.2 w
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a cofork is a colimit cocone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def Cofork.IsColimit.mk (t : Cofork f g) (desc : ∀ s : Cofork f g, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : Cofork f g, Cofork.π t ≫ desc s = Cofork.π s)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Cofork f g) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt) (_ : t.π ≫ m = s.π), m = desc s) : IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j =>
WalkingParallelPair.casesOn j (by erw [← s.w left, ← t.w left, Category.assoc, fac]; rfl)
(fac s)
uniq := by aesop }
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a fork is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def Cofork.IsColimit.mk' {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (t : Cofork f g)
(create : ∀ s : Cofork f g, { l : t.pt ⟶ s.pt // t.π ≫ l = s.π
∧ ∀ {m}, t.π ≫ m = s.π → m = l }) : IsColimit t :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2 w
/-- Noncomputably make a limit cone from the existence of unique factorizations. -/
noncomputable def Fork.IsLimit.ofExistsUnique {t : Fork f g}
(hs : ∀ s : Fork f g, ∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, l ≫ Fork.ι t = Fork.ι s) : IsLimit t := by
choose d hd hd' using hs
exact Fork.IsLimit.mk _ d hd fun s m hm => hd' _ _ hm
/-- Noncomputably make a colimit cocone from the existence of unique factorizations. -/
noncomputable def Cofork.IsColimit.ofExistsUnique {t : Cofork f g}
(hs : ∀ s : Cofork f g, ∃! d : t.pt ⟶ s.pt, Cofork.π t ≫ d = Cofork.π s) : IsColimit t := by
choose d hd hd' using hs
exact Cofork.IsColimit.mk _ d hd fun s m hm => hd' _ _ hm
/--
Given a limit cone for the pair `f g : X ⟶ Y`, for any `Z`, morphisms from `Z` to its point are in
bijection with morphisms `h : Z ⟶ X` such that `h ≫ f = h ≫ g`.
Further, this bijection is natural in `Z`: see `Fork.IsLimit.homIso_natural`.
This is a special case of `IsLimit.homIso'`, often useful to construct adjunctions.
-/
@[simps]
def Fork.IsLimit.homIso {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Fork f g} (ht : IsLimit t) (Z : C) :
(Z ⟶ t.pt) ≃ { h : Z ⟶ X // h ≫ f = h ≫ g } where
toFun k := ⟨k ≫ t.ι, by simp only [Category.assoc, t.condition]⟩
invFun h := (Fork.IsLimit.lift' ht _ h.prop).1
left_inv _ := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (Fork.IsLimit.lift' _ _ _).prop
right_inv _ := Subtype.ext (Fork.IsLimit.lift' ht _ _).prop
/-- The bijection of `Fork.IsLimit.homIso` is natural in `Z`. -/
theorem Fork.IsLimit.homIso_natural {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Fork f g} (ht : IsLimit t)
{Z Z' : C} (q : Z' ⟶ Z) (k : Z ⟶ t.pt) :
(Fork.IsLimit.homIso ht _ (q ≫ k) : Z' ⟶ X) = q ≫ (Fork.IsLimit.homIso ht _ k : Z ⟶ X) :=
Category.assoc _ _ _
/-- Given a colimit cocone for the pair `f g : X ⟶ Y`, for any `Z`, morphisms from the cocone point
to `Z` are in bijection with morphisms `h : Y ⟶ Z` such that `f ≫ h = g ≫ h`.
Further, this bijection is natural in `Z`: see `Cofork.IsColimit.homIso_natural`.
This is a special case of `IsColimit.homIso'`, often useful to construct adjunctions.
-/
@[simps]
def Cofork.IsColimit.homIso {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Cofork f g} (ht : IsColimit t) (Z : C) :
(t.pt ⟶ Z) ≃ { h : Y ⟶ Z // f ≫ h = g ≫ h } where
toFun k := ⟨t.π ≫ k, by simp only [← Category.assoc, t.condition]⟩
invFun h := (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' ht _ h.prop).1
left_inv _ := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext ht (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' _ _ _).prop
right_inv _ := Subtype.ext (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' ht _ _).prop
/-- The bijection of `Cofork.IsColimit.homIso` is natural in `Z`. -/
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.homIso_natural {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Cofork f g} {Z Z' : C}
(q : Z ⟶ Z') (ht : IsColimit t) (k : t.pt ⟶ Z) :
(Cofork.IsColimit.homIso ht _ (k ≫ q) : Y ⟶ Z') =
(Cofork.IsColimit.homIso ht _ k : Y ⟶ Z) ≫ q :=
(Category.assoc _ _ _).symm
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
equalizers. Given `F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)`, and a fork on `F.map left` and `F.map right`,
we get a cone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasEqualizers_of_hasLimit_parallelPair`,
which you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
def Cone.ofFork {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right)) : Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π :=
{ app := fun X => t.π.app X ≫ eqToHom (by simp)
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp [t.condition]}}
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
coequalizers. Given `F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)`, and a cofork on `F.map left` and `F.map right`,
we get a cocone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at
`hasCoequalizers_of_hasColimit_parallelPair`, which you may find to be an easier way of
achieving your goal. -/
def Cocone.ofCofork {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun X => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ t.ι.app X
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp [t.condition]}}
@[simp]
theorem Cone.ofFork_π {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right)) (j) :
(Cone.ofFork t).π.app j = t.π.app j ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Cocone.ofCofork_ι {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right))
(j) : (Cocone.ofCofork t).ι.app j = eqToHom (by simp) ≫ t.ι.app j := rfl
/-- Given `F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)` and a cone on `F`, we get a fork on
`F.map left` and `F.map right`. -/
def Fork.ofCone {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right) where
pt := t.pt
π := { app := fun X => t.π.app X ≫ eqToHom (by simp)
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp}}
/-- Given `F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)` and a cocone on `F`, we get a cofork on
`F.map left` and `F.map right`. -/
def Cofork.ofCocone {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right) where
pt := t.pt
ι := { app := fun X => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ t.ι.app X
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp}}
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ofCone_π {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) (j) :
(Fork.ofCone t).π.app j = t.π.app j ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.ofCocone_ι {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) (j) :
(Cofork.ofCocone t).ι.app j = eqToHom (by simp) ≫ t.ι.app j := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ι_postcompose {f' g' : X ⟶ Y} {α : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g'}
{c : Fork f g} : Fork.ι ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) = c.ι ≫ α.app _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.π_precompose {f' g' : X ⟶ Y} {α : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g'}
{c : Cofork f' g'} : Cofork.π ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) = α.app _ ≫ c.π :=
rfl
/-- Helper function for constructing morphisms between equalizer forks.
-/
@[simps]
def Fork.mkHom {s t : Fork f g} (k : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (w : k ≫ t.ι = s.ι) : s ⟶ t where
hom := k
w := by
rintro ⟨_ | _⟩
· exact w
· simp only [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left,← Category.assoc]
congr
/-- To construct an isomorphism between forks,
it suffices to give an isomorphism between the cone points
and check that it commutes with the `ι` morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def Fork.ext {s t : Fork f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w : i.hom ≫ t.ι = s.ι := by aesop_cat) :
s ≅ t where
hom := Fork.mkHom i.hom w
inv := Fork.mkHom i.inv (by rw [← w, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc])
/-- Two forks of the form `ofι` are isomorphic whenever their `ι`'s are equal. -/
def ForkOfι.ext {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) (w' : ι' ≫ f = ι' ≫ g) (h : ι = ι') :
Fork.ofι ι w ≅ Fork.ofι ι' w' :=
Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [h])
/-- Every fork is isomorphic to one of the form `Fork.of_ι _ _`. -/
def Fork.isoForkOfι (c : Fork f g) : c ≅ Fork.ofι c.ι c.condition :=
Fork.ext (by simp only [Fork.ofι_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj]; rfl) (by simp)
/--
Given two forks with isomorphic components in such a way that the natural diagrams commute, then if
one is a limit, then the other one is as well.
-/
def Fork.isLimitOfIsos {X' Y' : C} (c : Fork f g) (hc : IsLimit c)
{f' g' : X' ⟶ Y'} (c' : Fork f' g')
(e₀ : X ≅ X') (e₁ : Y ≅ Y') (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(comm₁ : e₀.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ e₁.hom := by aesop_cat)
(comm₂ : e₀.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ e₁.hom := by aesop_cat)
(comm₃ : e.hom ≫ c'.ι = c.ι ≫ e₀.hom := by aesop_cat) : IsLimit c' :=
let i : parallelPair f g ≅ parallelPair f' g' := parallelPair.ext e₀ e₁ comm₁.symm comm₂.symm
| (IsLimit.equivOfNatIsoOfIso i c c' (Fork.ext e comm₃)) hc
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Equalizers.lean | 627 | 628 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Semicontinuous maps
A function `f` from a topological space `α` to an ordered space `β` is lower semicontinuous at a
point `x` if, for any `y < f x`, for any `x'` close enough to `x`, one has `f x' > y`. In other
words, `f` can jump up, but it can not jump down.
Upper semicontinuous functions are defined similarly.
This file introduces these notions, and a basic API around them mimicking the API for continuous
functions.
## Main definitions and results
We introduce 4 definitions related to lower semicontinuity:
* `LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousAt f x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousOn f s`
* `LowerSemicontinuous f`
We build a basic API using dot notation around these notions, and we prove that
* constant functions are lower semicontinuous;
* `indicator s (fun _ ↦ y)` is lower semicontinuous when `s` is open and `0 ≤ y`,
or when `s` is closed and `y ≤ 0`;
* continuous functions are lower semicontinuous;
* left composition with a continuous monotone functions maps lower semicontinuous functions to lower
semicontinuous functions. If the function is anti-monotone, it instead maps lower semicontinuous
functions to upper semicontinuous functions;
* right composition with continuous functions preserves lower and upper semicontinuity;
* a sum of two (or finitely many) lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* a supremum of a family of lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* An infinite sum of `ℝ≥0∞`-valued lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous.
Similar results are stated and proved for upper semicontinuity.
We also prove that a function is continuous if and only if it is both lower and upper
semicontinuous.
We have some equivalent definitions of lower- and upper-semicontinuity (under certain
restrictions on the order on the codomain):
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf` in a dense complete linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph` in a dense complete linear order with the order
topology.
## Implementation details
All the nontrivial results for upper semicontinuous functions are deduced from the corresponding
ones for lower semicontinuous functions using `OrderDual`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_convex_function>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-continuity>
-/
open Topology ENNReal
open Set Function Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} {x : α}
{s t : Set α} {y z : β}
/-! ### Main definitions -/
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in
a general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, LowerSemicontinuousAt f x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a
general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'`
close enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered
space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, UpperSemicontinuousAt f x
/-!
### Lower semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for lower semicontinuity -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, LowerSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : LowerSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousOn, LowerSemicontinuous, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_const : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_const : LowerSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz.trans_le hy, hz]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz, hz.trans_le hy]
· filter_upwards [hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
end
/-! #### Relationship with continuity -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) := by
rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Iic]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem Continuous.lowerSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : LowerSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt
end
/-! #### Equivalent definitions -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
constructor
· intro hf; unfold LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt at hf
contrapose! hf
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between hf; use y
exact ⟨ylt, fun h => lty.not_le
(le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (h.mono fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx))⟩
exact fun hf y ylt => eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (ylt.trans_le hf)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf,
← nhdsWithin_univ]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuous]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuousOn]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousOn.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | f p.1 ≤ p.2} := by
constructor
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf, isClosed_iff_forall_filter]
rintro hf ⟨x, y⟩ F F_ne h h'
rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod] at h'
calc f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := hf x
_ ≤ liminf f (map Prod.fst F) := liminf_le_liminf_of_le h'.1
_ = liminf (f ∘ Prod.fst) F := (Filter.liminf_comp _ _ _).symm
_ ≤ liminf Prod.snd F := liminf_le_liminf <| by
simpa using (eventually_principal.2 fun (_ : α × γ) ↦ id).filter_mono h
_ = y := h'.2.liminf_eq
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage]
exact fun hf y ↦ hf.preimage (.prodMk_left y)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_epigraph, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph
end
/-! ### Composition -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
intro y hy
by_cases h : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z, zlt, hz⟩ : ∃ z < f x, Ioc z (f x) ⊆ g ⁻¹' Ioi y :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (hg (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)) h
filter_upwards [hf z zlt] with a ha
calc
y < g (min (f x) (f a)) := hz (by simp [zlt, ha, le_refl])
_ ≤ g (f a) := gmon (min_le_right _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at h
exact Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun a => hy.trans_le (gmon (h (f a)))
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hg.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
/-! #### Addition -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid γ] [LinearOrder γ] [IsOrderedAddMonoid γ]
[TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, xu, v_open, xv, h⟩ :
∃ u v : Set γ,
IsOpen u ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ g x ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ { p : γ × γ | y < p.fst + p.snd } :=
mem_nhds_prod_iff'.1 (hcont (isOpen_Ioi.mem_nhds hy))
by_cases hx₁ : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z₁, z₁lt, h₁⟩ : ∃ z₁ < f x, Ioc z₁ (f x) ⊆ u :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu) hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt, hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₁z h₂z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, A2⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt] with z h₁z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, xv⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (hx₂ (g z))
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₂z
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H] using h₂ ⟨z₂lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (f x, min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, A2⟩
calc
y < f x + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁ hx₂
apply Filter.Eventually.of_forall
intro z
have : (f x, g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, xv⟩
calc
y < f x + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (hx₂ (g z))
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x := by
classical
induction a using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
| insert _ _ ia IH =>
simp only [ia, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add (ha _ (Finset.mem_insert_self ..))
(IH fun j ja => ha j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ja))
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z :=
fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x
end
/-! #### Supremum -/
section
variable {ι : Sort*} {δ δ' : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder δ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder δ']
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simpa only [iSup_of_empty'] using lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
· intro y hy
rcases exists_lt_of_lt_ciSup hy with ⟨i, hi⟩
filter_upwards [h i y hi, bdd] with y hy hy' using hy.trans_le (le_ciSup hy' i)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i hi) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at bdd
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup bdd h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i hi) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ x ∈ s, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i hi) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'} (bdd : ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' := fun x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (Eventually.of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuous (f i hi)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun hi => h i hi
end
/-! #### Infinite sums -/
section
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s x := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
refine lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun b => ?_
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i _hi => h i
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ∑' i, f i x' := fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum fun i => h i x
end
/-!
### Upper semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for upper semicontinuity -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt, UpperSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : UpperSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ UpperSemicontinuous f := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousOn, UpperSemicontinuous, upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousOn (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
|
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
| Mathlib/Topology/Semicontinuous.lean | 707 | 709 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Infinite sum in the reals
This file provides lemmas about Cauchy sequences in terms of infinite sums and infinite sums valued
in the reals.
-/
open Filter Finset NNReal Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α}
/-- If the distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated by a summable series,
then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using fun n ↦ dist_nonneg.trans (hf n)
apply cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d (α := α) (f := f)
· exact_mod_cast hf
· exact_mod_cast hd
theorem cauchySeq_of_summable_dist (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) := by
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha) (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨n, fun m hnm ↦ ?_⟩)
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
refine Summable.sum_le_tsum (range _) (fun _ _ ↦ le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) ?_
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n) : dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n + m)) (f (n + m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (fun x ↦ dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m) from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h ha n
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
section summable
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
simpa using mod_cast NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg hf]
theorem summable_sigma_of_nonneg {α} {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
lift f to (Σx, β x) → ℝ≥0 using hf
simpa using mod_cast NNReal.summable_sigma
lemma summable_partition {α β : Type*} {f : β → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) {s : α → Set β}
(hs : ∀ i, ∃! j, i ∈ s j) : Summable f ↔
(∀ j, Summable fun i : s j ↦ f i) ∧ Summable fun j ↦ ∑' i : s j, f i := by
simpa only [← (Set.sigmaEquiv s hs).summable_iff] using summable_sigma_of_nonneg (fun _ ↦ hf _)
theorem summable_prod_of_nonneg {α β} {f : (α × β) → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y ↦ f (x, y)) ∧ Summable fun x ↦ ∑' y, f (x, y) :=
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).summable_iff.symm.trans <| summable_sigma_of_nonneg fun _ ↦ hf _
theorem summable_of_sum_le {ι : Type*} {f : ι → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f)
(h : ∀ u : Finset ι, ∑ x ∈ u, f x ≤ c) : Summable f :=
⟨⨆ u : Finset ι, ∑ x ∈ u, f x,
tendsto_atTop_ciSup (Finset.sum_mono_set_of_nonneg hf) ⟨c, fun _ ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ h u⟩⟩
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n)
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine (summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg hf).2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
theorem Real.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n)
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
(summable_of_sum_range_le hf h).tsum_le_of_sum_range_le h
/-- If a sequence `f` with non-negative terms is dominated by a sequence `g` with summable
series and at least one term of `f` is strictly smaller than the corresponding term in `g`,
then the series of `f` is strictly smaller than the series of `g`. -/
protected theorem Summable.tsum_lt_tsum_of_nonneg {i : ℕ} {f g : ℕ → ℝ} (h0 : ∀ b : ℕ, 0 ≤ f b)
| (h : ∀ b : ℕ, f b ≤ g b) (hi : f i < g i) (hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
Summable.tsum_lt_tsum h hi (.of_nonneg_of_le h0 h hg) hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_lt_tsum_of_nonneg :=
Summable.tsum_lt_tsum_of_nonneg
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Real.lean | 99 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `Function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `Function.mulSupport f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α β A B M M' N P G : Type*}
section One
variable [One M] [One N] [One P]
/-- `mulSupport` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
def mulSupport (f : α → M) : Set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_preimage (f : α → M) : mulSupport f = f ⁻¹' {1}ᶜ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nmem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∉ mulSupport f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
@[to_additive]
theorem compl_mulSupport {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f)ᶜ = { x | f x = 1 } :=
ext fun _ => nmem_mulSupport
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∈ mulSupport f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} : mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_imp_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f = s ↔ (∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≠ 1) ∧ ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 1 := by
simp +contextual only [Set.ext_iff, mem_mulSupport, ne_eq, iff_def,
not_imp_comm, and_comm, forall_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff_mulSupport {f g : α → M} :
f = g ↔ f.mulSupport = g.mulSupport ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.mulSupport, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ funext fun x ↦ by
if hx : x ∈ f.mulSupport then exact h₂ x hx
else rw [nmem_mulSupport.1 hx, nmem_mulSupport.1 (mt (Set.ext_iff.1 h₁ x).2 hx)]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_of_ne_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) {y : M} (hy : y ≠ 1) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = insert x (mulSupport f) := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) :
mulSupport (update f x 1) = mulSupport f \ {x} := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_eq_ite [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] (f : α → M) (x : α) (y : M) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = if y = 1 then mulSupport f \ {x} else insert x (mulSupport f) := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 1 with rfl | hy <;> simp [mulSupport_update_one, mulSupport_update_of_ne_one, *]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one_subset {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) ⊆ f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_subset_iff'.mpr fun x hfg ↦ by
by_cases hf : ∃ a, f a = x
· rw [extend, dif_pos hf, ← nmem_mulSupport]
rw [← Classical.choose_spec hf] at hfg
exact fun hg ↦ hfg ⟨_, hg, rfl⟩
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ hf]; rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} (hf : f.Injective) :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) = f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_extend_one_subset.antisymm <| by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; rwa [mem_mulSupport, hf.extend_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_disjoint_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint (mulSupport f) s ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by
simp_rw [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, mulSupport_subset_iff', not_mem_compl_iff, EqOn,
Pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_mulSupport_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint s (mulSupport f) ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by
rw [disjoint_comm, mulSupport_disjoint_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_eq_empty_iff {f : α → M} : mulSupport f = ∅ ↔ f = 1 := by
rw [← subset_empty_iff, mulSupport_subset_iff', funext_iff]
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| theorem mulSupport_nonempty_iff {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 1 := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, mulSupport_eq_empty_iff]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Support.lean | 119 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.SplitCoequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.SplitEqualizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Basic
/-!
# Preserving (co)equalizers
Constructions to relate the notions of preserving (co)equalizers and reflecting (co)equalizers
to concrete (co)forks.
In particular, we show that `equalizerComparison f g G` is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves
the limit of the parallel pair `f,g`, as well as the dual result.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
section Equalizers
variable {X Y Z : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {h : Z ⟶ X} (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g)
/-- The map of a fork is a limit iff the fork consisting of the mapped morphisms is a limit. This
essentially lets us commute `Fork.ofι` with `Functor.mapCone`.
-/
def isLimitMapConeForkEquiv :
IsLimit (G.mapCone (Fork.ofι h w)) ≃
IsLimit (Fork.ofι (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Fork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoParallelPair _) _).symm.trans
(IsLimit.equivIsoLimit (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [Fork.ι])))
/-- The property of preserving equalizers expressed in terms of forks. -/
def isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit [PreservesLimit (parallelPair f g) G] (l : IsLimit (Fork.ofι h w)) :
IsLimit (Fork.ofι (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Fork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isLimitMapConeForkEquiv G w (isLimitOfPreserves G l)
/-- The property of reflecting equalizers expressed in terms of forks. -/
def isLimitOfIsLimitForkMap [ReflectsLimit (parallelPair f g) G]
(l : IsLimit (Fork.ofι (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Fork (G.map f) (G.map g))) :
IsLimit (Fork.ofι h w) :=
isLimitOfReflects G ((isLimitMapConeForkEquiv G w).symm l)
variable (f g)
variable [HasEqualizer f g]
/--
If `G` preserves equalizers and `C` has them, then the fork constructed of the mapped morphisms of
a fork is a limit.
-/
def isLimitOfHasEqualizerOfPreservesLimit [PreservesLimit (parallelPair f g) G] :
IsLimit (Fork.ofι
(G.map (equalizer.ι f g)) (by simp only [← G.map_comp]; rw [equalizer.condition]) :
Fork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit G _ (equalizerIsEqualizer f g)
variable [HasEqualizer (G.map f) (G.map g)]
/-- If the equalizer comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is an isomorphism, then `G` preserves the
equalizer of `(f,g)`.
-/
lemma PreservesEqualizer.of_iso_comparison [i : IsIso (equalizerComparison f g G)] :
PreservesLimit (parallelPair f g) G := by
apply preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (equalizerIsEqualizer f g)
apply (isLimitMapConeForkEquiv _ _).symm _
exact @IsLimit.ofPointIso _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (limit.isLimit (parallelPair (G.map f) (G.map g))) i
variable [PreservesLimit (parallelPair f g) G]
/--
If `G` preserves the equalizer of `(f,g)`, then the equalizer comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is
an isomorphism.
-/
def PreservesEqualizer.iso : G.obj (equalizer f g) ≅ equalizer (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (isLimitOfHasEqualizerOfPreservesLimit G f g) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem PreservesEqualizer.iso_hom :
(PreservesEqualizer.iso G f g).hom = equalizerComparison f g G :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem PreservesEqualizer.iso_inv_ι :
(PreservesEqualizer.iso G f g).inv ≫ G.map (equalizer.ι f g) =
equalizer.ι (G.map f) (G.map g) := by
rw [← Iso.cancel_iso_hom_left (PreservesEqualizer.iso G f g), ← Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id]
simp
instance : IsIso (equalizerComparison f g G) := by
rw [← PreservesEqualizer.iso_hom]
infer_instance
end Equalizers
section Coequalizers
variable {X Y Z : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {h : Y ⟶ Z} (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ h)
/-- The map of a cofork is a colimit iff the cofork consisting of the mapped morphisms is a colimit.
This essentially lets us commute `Cofork.ofπ` with `Functor.mapCocone`.
-/
def isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv :
IsColimit (G.mapCocone (Cofork.ofπ h w)) ≃
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (diagramIsoParallelPair _) _).symm.trans <|
IsColimit.equivIsoColimit <|
Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
dsimp only [Cofork.π, Cofork.ofπ_ι_app]
dsimp; rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- The property of preserving coequalizers expressed in terms of coforks. -/
def isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
(l : IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ h w)) :
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv G w (isColimitOfPreserves G l)
/-- The property of reflecting coequalizers expressed in terms of coforks. -/
def isColimitOfIsColimitCoforkMap [ReflectsColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
(l :
IsColimit
(Cofork.ofπ (G.map h) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g))) :
IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ h w) :=
isColimitOfReflects G ((isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv G w).symm l)
variable (f g)
variable [HasCoequalizer f g]
/--
If `G` preserves coequalizers and `C` has them, then the cofork constructed of the mapped morphisms
of a cofork is a colimit.
-/
def isColimitOfHasCoequalizerOfPreservesColimit [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G] :
IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ (G.map (coequalizer.π f g)) (by
simp only [← G.map_comp]; rw [coequalizer.condition]) : Cofork (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit G _ (coequalizerIsCoequalizer f g)
variable [HasCoequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g)]
/-- If the coequalizer comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is an isomorphism, then `G` preserves the
coequalizer of `(f,g)`.
-/
lemma of_iso_comparison [i : IsIso (coequalizerComparison f g G)] :
PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G := by
apply preservesColimit_of_preserves_colimit_cocone (coequalizerIsCoequalizer f g)
apply (isColimitMapCoconeCoforkEquiv _ _).symm _
exact
@IsColimit.ofPointIso _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (colimit.isColimit (parallelPair (G.map f) (G.map g))) i
variable [PreservesColimit (parallelPair f g) G]
/--
If `G` preserves the coequalizer of `(f,g)`, then the coequalizer comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)`
is an isomorphism.
-/
def PreservesCoequalizer.iso : coequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g) ≅ G.obj (coequalizer f g) :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _)
(isColimitOfHasCoequalizerOfPreservesColimit G f g)
@[simp]
theorem PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom :
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).hom = coequalizerComparison f g G :=
rfl
instance : IsIso (coequalizerComparison f g G) := by
rw [← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom]
infer_instance
instance map_π_epi : Epi (G.map (coequalizer.π f g)) :=
⟨fun {W} h k => by
rw [← ι_comp_coequalizerComparison]
haveI : Epi (coequalizer.π (G.map f) (G.map g) ≫ coequalizerComparison f g G) := by
apply epi_comp
apply (cancel_epi _).1⟩
@[reassoc]
theorem map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv :
G.map (coequalizer.π f g) ≫ (PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).inv =
coequalizer.π (G.map f) (G.map g) := by
rw [← ι_comp_coequalizerComparison_assoc, ← PreservesCoequalizer.iso_hom, Iso.hom_inv_id,
comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc {W : D} (k : G.obj Y ⟶ W)
(wk : G.map f ≫ k = G.map g ≫ k) : G.map (coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).inv ≫ coequalizer.desc k wk = k := by
rw [← Category.assoc, map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv, coequalizer.π_desc]
@[reassoc]
theorem map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap {X' Y' : D} (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y')
[HasCoequalizer f' g'] (p : G.obj X ⟶ X') (q : G.obj Y ⟶ Y') (wf : G.map f ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : G.map g ≫ q = p ≫ g') :
G.map (coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (G.map f) (G.map g) f' g' p q wf wg) =
q ≫ coequalizer.π f' g' := by
rw [← Category.assoc, map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv, ι_colimMap, parallelPairHom_app_one]
@[reassoc]
theorem map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc {X' Y' : D} (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y')
[HasCoequalizer f' g'] (p : G.obj X ⟶ X') (q : G.obj Y ⟶ Y') (wf : G.map f ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : G.map g ≫ q = p ≫ g') {Z' : D} (h : Y' ⟶ Z') (wh : f' ≫ h = g' ≫ h) :
| G.map (coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso G f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (G.map f) (G.map g) f' g' p q wf wg) ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
q ≫ h := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Equalizers.lean | 217 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
/-- `p ∧ q` occurs frequently along the product of two filters
iff both `p` and `q` occur frequently along the corresponding filters. -/
theorem frequently_prod_and {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x.1 ∧ q x.2) ↔ (∃ᶠ a in f, p a) ∧ ∃ᶠ b in g, q b := by
simp only [frequently_iff_neBot, ← prod_neBot, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
rfl
theorem tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (x ×ˢ y) z ↔ ∀ W ∈ z, ∃ U ∈ x, ∃ V ∈ y, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop]
theorem tendsto_prod_iff' {g' : Filter γ} {s : α → β × γ} :
Tendsto s f (g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).1) f g ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).2) f g' := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, tendsto_inf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem le_prod {f : Filter (α × β)} {g : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
(f ≤ g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto Prod.fst f g ∧ Tendsto Prod.snd f g' :=
tendsto_prod_iff'
end Prod
/-! ### Coproducts of filters -/
section Coprod
variable {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.coprod f g = f ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g := by
rw [prod_top, top_prod]
rfl
theorem mem_coprod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f.coprod g ↔ (∃ t₁ ∈ f, Prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ t₂ ∈ g, Prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem bot_coprod (l : Filter β) : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod l = comap Prod.snd l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_bot (l : Filter α) : l.coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = comap Prod.fst l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
theorem bot_coprod_bot : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := by simp
theorem compl_mem_coprod {s : Set (α × β)} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
sᶜ ∈ la.coprod lb ↔ (Prod.fst '' s)ᶜ ∈ la ∧ (Prod.snd '' s)ᶜ ∈ lb := by
simp only [Filter.coprod, mem_sup, compl_mem_comap]
@[mono]
theorem coprod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ≤ f₂.coprod g₂ :=
sup_le_sup (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
theorem coprod_neBot_iff : (f.coprod g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β ∨ Nonempty α ∧ g.NeBot := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_left [NeBot f] [Nonempty β] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_right [NeBot g] [Nonempty α] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
theorem coprod_inf_prod_le (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ≤ f₁ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ g₁ := calc
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂
_ = (f₁ ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ := by rw [coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod]
_ = f₁ ×ˢ ⊤ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ := inf_sup_right _ _ _
_ = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by simp [prod_inf_prod]
_ ≤ f₁ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ g₁ :=
sup_le_sup (prod_mono inf_le_left le_rfl) (prod_mono le_rfl inf_le_left)
theorem principal_coprod_principal (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(𝓟 s).coprod (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (sᶜ ×ˢ tᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [Filter.coprod, comap_principal, comap_principal, sup_principal, Set.prod_eq, compl_inter,
preimage_compl, preimage_compl, compl_compl, compl_compl]
-- this inequality can be strict; see `map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal` and
-- `map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal` below.
theorem map_prodMap_coprod_le.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map (Prod.map m₁ m₂) (f₁.coprod f₂) ≤ (map m₁ f₁).coprod (map m₂ f₂) := by
intro s
simp only [mem_map, mem_coprod_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨u₁, hu₁, h₁⟩, u₂, hu₂, h₂⟩
refine ⟨⟨m₁ ⁻¹' u₁, hu₁, fun _ hx => h₁ ?_⟩, ⟨m₂ ⁻¹' u₂, hu₂, fun _ hx => h₂ ?_⟩⟩ <;> convert hx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias map_prod_map_coprod_le := map_prodMap_coprod_le
/-- Characterization of the coproduct of the `Filter.map`s of two principal filters `𝓟 {a}` and
`𝓟 {i}`, the first under the constant function `fun a => b` and the second under the identity
| function. Together with the next lemma, `map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal`, this
provides an example showing that the inequality in the lemma `map_prodMap_coprod_le` can be strict.
-/
theorem map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal {α β ι : Type*} (a : α) (b : β) (i : ι) :
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 503 | 506 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Andrew Yang, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.End
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
/-!
# Shift
A `Shift` on a category `C` indexed by a monoid `A` is nothing more than a monoidal functor
from `A` to `C ⥤ C`. A typical example to keep in mind might be the category of
complexes `⋯ → C_{n-1} → C_n → C_{n+1} → ⋯`. It has a shift indexed by `ℤ`, where we assign to
each `n : ℤ` the functor `C ⥤ C` that re-indexes the terms, so the degree `i` term of `Shift n C`
would be the degree `i+n`-th term of `C`.
## Main definitions
* `HasShift`: A typeclass asserting the existence of a shift functor.
* `shiftEquiv`: When the indexing monoid is a group, then the functor indexed by `n` and `-n` forms
a self-equivalence of `C`.
* `shiftComm`: When the indexing monoid is commutative, then shifts commute as well.
## Implementation Notes
`[HasShift C A]` is implemented using monoidal functors from `Discrete A` to `C ⥤ C`.
However, the API of monoidal functors is used only internally: one should use the API of
shifts functors which includes `shiftFunctor C a : C ⥤ C` for `a : A`,
`shiftFunctorZero C A : shiftFunctor C (0 : A) ≅ 𝟭 C` and
`shiftFunctorAdd C i j : shiftFunctor C (i + j) ≅ shiftFunctor C i ⋙ shiftFunctor C j`
(and its variant `shiftFunctorAdd'`). These isomorphisms satisfy some coherence properties
which are stated in lemmas like `shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc`, `shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add` and
`shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
noncomputable section
universe v u
variable (C : Type u) (A : Type*) [Category.{v} C]
attribute [local instance] endofunctorMonoidalCategory
variable {A C}
section Defs
variable (A C) [AddMonoid A]
/-- A category has a shift indexed by an additive monoid `A`
if there is a monoidal functor from `A` to `C ⥤ C`. -/
class HasShift (C : Type u) (A : Type*) [Category.{v} C] [AddMonoid A] where
/-- a shift is a monoidal functor from `A` to `C ⥤ C` -/
shift : Discrete A ⥤ C ⥤ C
/-- `shift` is monoidal -/
shiftMonoidal : shift.Monoidal := by infer_instance
/-- A helper structure to construct the shift functor `(Discrete A) ⥤ (C ⥤ C)`. -/
structure ShiftMkCore where
/-- the family of shift functors -/
F : A → C ⥤ C
/-- the shift by 0 identifies to the identity functor -/
zero : F 0 ≅ 𝟭 C
/-- the composition of shift functors identifies to the shift by the sum -/
add : ∀ n m : A, F (n + m) ≅ F n ⋙ F m
/-- compatibility with the associativity -/
assoc_hom_app : ∀ (m₁ m₂ m₃ : A) (X : C),
(add (m₁ + m₂) m₃).hom.app X ≫ (F m₃).map ((add m₁ m₂).hom.app X) =
eqToHom (by rw [add_assoc]) ≫ (add m₁ (m₂ + m₃)).hom.app X ≫
(add m₂ m₃).hom.app ((F m₁).obj X) := by aesop_cat
/-- compatibility with the left addition with 0 -/
zero_add_hom_app : ∀ (n : A) (X : C), (add 0 n).hom.app X =
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [zero_add]) ≫ (F n).map (zero.inv.app X) := by aesop_cat
/-- compatibility with the right addition with 0 -/
add_zero_hom_app : ∀ (n : A) (X : C), (add n 0).hom.app X =
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [add_zero]) ≫ zero.inv.app ((F n).obj X) := by aesop_cat
namespace ShiftMkCore
variable {C A}
attribute [reassoc] assoc_hom_app
@[reassoc]
lemma assoc_inv_app (h : ShiftMkCore C A) (m₁ m₂ m₃ : A) (X : C) :
(h.F m₃).map ((h.add m₁ m₂).inv.app X) ≫ (h.add (m₁ + m₂) m₃).inv.app X =
(h.add m₂ m₃).inv.app ((h.F m₁).obj X) ≫ (h.add m₁ (m₂ + m₃)).inv.app X ≫
eqToHom (by rw [add_assoc]) := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((h.add (m₁ + m₂) m₃).hom.app X ≫ (h.F m₃).map ((h.add m₁ m₂).hom.app X)),
Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app, Functor.map_id, h.assoc_hom_app, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl,
Category.id_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app]
rfl
lemma zero_add_inv_app (h : ShiftMkCore C A) (n : A) (X : C) :
(h.add 0 n).inv.app X = (h.F n).map (h.zero.hom.app X) ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [zero_add]) := by
rw [← cancel_epi ((h.add 0 n).hom.app X), Iso.hom_inv_id_app, h.zero_add_hom_app,
Category.assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, Functor.map_id,
Category.id_comp, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
lemma add_zero_inv_app (h : ShiftMkCore C A) (n : A) (X : C) :
(h.add n 0).inv.app X = h.zero.hom.app ((h.F n).obj X) ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [add_zero]) := by
rw [← cancel_epi ((h.add n 0).hom.app X), Iso.hom_inv_id_app, h.add_zero_hom_app,
Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
end ShiftMkCore
section
attribute [local simp] eqToHom_map
instance (h : ShiftMkCore C A) : (Discrete.functor h.F).Monoidal :=
Functor.CoreMonoidal.toMonoidal
{ εIso := h.zero.symm
μIso := fun m n ↦ (h.add m.as n.as).symm
μIso_hom_natural_left := by
rintro ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨⟨rfl⟩⟩⟩ ⟨X'⟩
ext
dsimp
simp
μIso_hom_natural_right := by
rintro ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨X'⟩ ⟨⟨⟨rfl⟩⟩⟩
ext
dsimp
simp
associativity := by
rintro ⟨m₁⟩ ⟨m₂⟩ ⟨m₃⟩
ext X
simp [endofunctorMonoidalCategory, h.assoc_inv_app_assoc]
left_unitality := by
rintro ⟨n⟩
ext X
simp [endofunctorMonoidalCategory, h.zero_add_inv_app, ← Functor.map_comp]
right_unitality := by
rintro ⟨n⟩
ext X
simp [endofunctorMonoidalCategory, h.add_zero_inv_app] }
/-- Constructs a `HasShift C A` instance from `ShiftMkCore`. -/
def hasShiftMk (h : ShiftMkCore C A) : HasShift C A where
shift := Discrete.functor h.F
end
section
variable [HasShift C A]
/-- The monoidal functor from `A` to `C ⥤ C` given a `HasShift` instance. -/
def shiftMonoidalFunctor : Discrete A ⥤ C ⥤ C :=
HasShift.shift
instance : (shiftMonoidalFunctor C A).Monoidal := HasShift.shiftMonoidal
variable {A}
open Functor.Monoidal
/-- The shift autoequivalence, moving objects and morphisms 'up'. -/
def shiftFunctor (i : A) : C ⥤ C :=
(shiftMonoidalFunctor C A).obj ⟨i⟩
/-- Shifting by `i + j` is the same as shifting by `i` and then shifting by `j`. -/
def shiftFunctorAdd (i j : A) : shiftFunctor C (i + j) ≅ shiftFunctor C i ⋙ shiftFunctor C j :=
(μIso (shiftMonoidalFunctor C A) ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩).symm
/-- When `k = i + j`, shifting by `k` is the same as shifting by `i` and then shifting by `j`. -/
def shiftFunctorAdd' (i j k : A) (h : i + j = k) :
shiftFunctor C k ≅ shiftFunctor C i ⋙ shiftFunctor C j :=
eqToIso (by rw [h]) ≪≫ shiftFunctorAdd C i j
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd (i j : A) :
shiftFunctorAdd' C i j (i+j) rfl = shiftFunctorAdd C i j := by
ext1
apply Category.id_comp
variable (A) in
/-- Shifting by zero is the identity functor. -/
def shiftFunctorZero : shiftFunctor C (0 : A) ≅ 𝟭 C :=
(εIso (shiftMonoidalFunctor C A)).symm
/-- Shifting by `a` such that `a = 0` identifies to the identity functor. -/
def shiftFunctorZero' (a : A) (ha : a = 0) : shiftFunctor C a ≅ 𝟭 C :=
eqToIso (by rw [ha]) ≪≫ shiftFunctorZero C A
end
variable {C A}
lemma ShiftMkCore.shiftFunctor_eq (h : ShiftMkCore C A) (a : A) :
letI := hasShiftMk C A h
shiftFunctor C a = h.F a := rfl
lemma ShiftMkCore.shiftFunctorZero_eq (h : ShiftMkCore C A) :
letI := hasShiftMk C A h
shiftFunctorZero C A = h.zero := rfl
lemma ShiftMkCore.shiftFunctorAdd_eq (h : ShiftMkCore C A) (a b : A) :
letI := hasShiftMk C A h
shiftFunctorAdd C a b = h.add a b := rfl
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- shifting an object `X` by `n` is obtained by the notation `X⟦n⟧` -/
notation -- Any better notational suggestions?
X "⟦" n "⟧" => (shiftFunctor _ n).obj X
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- shifting a morphism `f` by `n` is obtained by the notation `f⟦n⟧'` -/
notation f "⟦" n "⟧'" => (shiftFunctor _ n).map f
variable (C)
variable [HasShift C A]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add (a : A) :
shiftFunctorAdd' C 0 a a (zero_add a) = (Functor.leftUnitor _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorZero C A).symm (shiftFunctor C a) := by
ext X
dsimp [shiftFunctorAdd', shiftFunctorZero, shiftFunctor]
simp only [eqToHom_app, obj_ε_app, Discrete.addMonoidal_leftUnitor, eqToIso.inv,
eqToHom_map, Category.id_comp]
rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero (a : A) :
shiftFunctorAdd' C a 0 a (add_zero a) = (Functor.rightUnitor _).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft (shiftFunctor C a) (shiftFunctorZero C A).symm := by
ext
dsimp [shiftFunctorAdd', shiftFunctorZero, shiftFunctor]
simp only [eqToHom_app, ε_app_obj, Discrete.addMonoidal_rightUnitor, eqToIso.inv,
eqToHom_map, Category.id_comp]
rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₁₂ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ : A)
(h₁₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a₁₂) (h₂₃ : a₂ + a₃ = a₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : a₁ + a₂ + a₃ = a₁₂₃) :
shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁₂ a₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂ a₁₂ h₁₂) _ ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _ =
shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← add_assoc, h₁₂₃]) ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft _ (shiftFunctorAdd' C a₂ a₃ a₂₃ h₂₃) := by
subst h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext X
dsimp
simp only [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, Category.comp_id]
dsimp [shiftFunctorAdd']
simp only [eqToHom_app]
dsimp [shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctor]
simp only [obj_μ_inv_app, Discrete.addMonoidal_associator, eqToIso.hom, eqToHom_map,
eqToHom_app]
erw [δ_μ_app_assoc, Category.assoc]
rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_assoc (a₁ a₂ a₃ : A) :
shiftFunctorAdd C (a₁ + a₂) a₃ ≪≫
isoWhiskerRight (shiftFunctorAdd C a₁ a₂) _ ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _ =
shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ (a₂ + a₃) _ (add_assoc a₁ a₂ a₃).symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft _ (shiftFunctorAdd C a₂ a₃) := by
ext X
simpa [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd]
using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom
(shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc C a₁ a₂ a₃ _ _ _ rfl rfl rfl)) X
variable {C}
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_hom_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd' C 0 a a (zero_add a)).hom.app X =
((shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app X)⟦a⟧' := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add C a)) X
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_zero_add_hom_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd C 0 a).hom.app X =
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [zero_add]) ≫ ((shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app X)⟦a⟧' := by
simp [← shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_hom_app, shiftFunctorAdd']
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_inv_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd' C 0 a a (zero_add a)).inv.app X =
((shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app X)⟦a⟧' := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.inv (shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add C a)) X
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_zero_add_inv_app (a : A) (X : C) : (shiftFunctorAdd C 0 a).inv.app X =
((shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app X)⟦a⟧' ≫ eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [zero_add]) := by
simp [← shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_inv_app, shiftFunctorAdd']
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_hom_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a 0 a (add_zero a)).hom.app X =
(shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app (X⟦a⟧) := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero C a)) X
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_add_zero_hom_app (a : A) (X : C) : (shiftFunctorAdd C a 0).hom.app X =
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [add_zero]) ≫ (shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app (X⟦a⟧) := by
simp [← shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_hom_app, shiftFunctorAdd']
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_inv_app (a : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a 0 a (add_zero a)).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app (X⟦a⟧) := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.inv (shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero C a)) X
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_add_zero_inv_app (a : A) (X : C) : (shiftFunctorAdd C a 0).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app (X⟦a⟧) ≫ eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [add_zero]) := by
simp [← shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_inv_app, shiftFunctorAdd']
@[reassoc]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc_hom_app (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₁₂ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ : A)
(h₁₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a₁₂) (h₂₃ : a₂ + a₃ = a₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : a₁ + a₂ + a₃ = a₁₂₃) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁₂ a₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃])).hom.app X ≫
((shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂ a₁₂ h₁₂).hom.app X)⟦a₃⟧' =
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← add_assoc, h₁₂₃])).hom.app X ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₂ a₃ a₂₃ h₂₃).hom.app (X⟦a₁⟧) := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom
(shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc C _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃)) X
@[reassoc]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc_inv_app (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₁₂ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ : A)
(h₁₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a₁₂) (h₂₃ : a₂ + a₃ = a₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : a₁ + a₂ + a₃ = a₁₂₃) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂ a₁₂ h₁₂).inv.app X)⟦a₃⟧' ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁₂ a₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃])).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₂ a₃ a₂₃ h₂₃).inv.app (X⟦a₁⟧) ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ a₂₃ a₁₂₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← add_assoc, h₁₂₃])).inv.app X := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.inv
(shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc C _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃)) X
@[reassoc]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_assoc_hom_app (a₁ a₂ a₃ : A) (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorAdd C (a₁ + a₂) a₃).hom.app X ≫
((shiftFunctorAdd C a₁ a₂).hom.app X)⟦a₃⟧' =
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ (a₂ + a₃) (a₁ + a₂ + a₃) (add_assoc _ _ _).symm).hom.app X ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd C a₂ a₃).hom.app (X⟦a₁⟧) := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.hom (shiftFunctorAdd_assoc C a₁ a₂ a₃)) X
@[reassoc]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_assoc_inv_app (a₁ a₂ a₃ : A) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorAdd C a₁ a₂).inv.app X)⟦a₃⟧' ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd C (a₁ + a₂) a₃).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorAdd C a₂ a₃).inv.app (X⟦a₁⟧) ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd' C a₁ (a₂ + a₃) (a₁ + a₂ + a₃) (add_assoc _ _ _).symm).inv.app X := by
simpa using NatTrans.congr_app (congr_arg Iso.inv (shiftFunctorAdd_assoc C a₁ a₂ a₃)) X
end Defs
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid A] [HasShift C A] (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y)
--@[simp]
--theorem HasShift.shift_obj_obj (n : A) (X : C) : (HasShift.shift.obj ⟨n⟩).obj X = X⟦n⟧ :=
-- rfl
/-- Shifting by `i + j` is the same as shifting by `i` and then shifting by `j`. -/
abbrev shiftAdd (i j : A) : X⟦i + j⟧ ≅ X⟦i⟧⟦j⟧ :=
(shiftFunctorAdd C i j).app _
theorem shift_shift' (i j : A) :
f⟦i⟧'⟦j⟧' = (shiftAdd X i j).inv ≫ f⟦i + j⟧' ≫ (shiftAdd Y i j).hom := by
symm
rw [← Functor.comp_map, Iso.app_inv]
apply NatIso.naturality_1
variable (A)
/-- Shifting by zero is the identity functor. -/
abbrev shiftZero : X⟦(0 : A)⟧ ≅ X :=
(shiftFunctorZero C A).app _
theorem shiftZero' : f⟦(0 : A)⟧' = (shiftZero A X).hom ≫ f ≫ (shiftZero A Y).inv := by
symm
rw [Iso.app_inv, Iso.app_hom]
apply NatIso.naturality_2
variable (C) {A}
/-- When `i + j = 0`, shifting by `i` and by `j` gives the identity functor -/
def shiftFunctorCompIsoId (i j : A) (h : i + j = 0) :
shiftFunctor C i ⋙ shiftFunctor C j ≅ 𝟭 C :=
(shiftFunctorAdd' C i j 0 h).symm ≪≫ shiftFunctorZero C A
end AddMonoid
section AddGroup
variable (C)
variable [AddGroup A] [HasShift C A]
/-- Shifting by `i` and shifting by `j` forms an equivalence when `i + j = 0`. -/
@[simps]
def shiftEquiv' (i j : A) (h : i + j = 0) : C ≌ C where
functor := shiftFunctor C i
inverse := shiftFunctor C j
unitIso := (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C i j h).symm
counitIso := shiftFunctorCompIsoId C j i
(by rw [← add_left_inj j, add_assoc, h, zero_add, add_zero])
functor_unitIso_comp X := by
convert (equivOfTensorIsoUnit (shiftMonoidalFunctor C A) ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ (Discrete.eqToIso h)
(Discrete.eqToIso (by dsimp; rw [← add_left_inj j, add_assoc, h, zero_add, add_zero]))
(Subsingleton.elim _ _)).functor_unitIso_comp X
all_goals
ext X
dsimp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId, unitOfTensorIsoUnit,
shiftFunctorAdd']
simp only [Category.assoc, eqToHom_map]
rfl
/-- Shifting by `n` and shifting by `-n` forms an equivalence. -/
abbrev shiftEquiv (n : A) : C ≌ C := shiftEquiv' C n (-n) (add_neg_cancel n)
variable (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y)
/-- Shifting by `i` is an equivalence. -/
instance (i : A) : (shiftFunctor C i).IsEquivalence := by
change (shiftEquiv C i).functor.IsEquivalence
infer_instance
variable {C}
/-- Shifting by `i` and then shifting by `-i` is the identity. -/
abbrev shiftShiftNeg (i : A) : X⟦i⟧⟦-i⟧ ≅ X :=
(shiftEquiv C i).unitIso.symm.app X
/-- Shifting by `-i` and then shifting by `i` is the identity. -/
abbrev shiftNegShift (i : A) : X⟦-i⟧⟦i⟧ ≅ X :=
(shiftEquiv C i).counitIso.app X
variable {X Y}
theorem shift_shift_neg' (i : A) :
f⟦i⟧'⟦-i⟧' = (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C i (-i) (add_neg_cancel i)).hom.app X ≫
f ≫ (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C i (-i) (add_neg_cancel i)).inv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C i (-i) (add_neg_cancel i)) f).symm
theorem shift_neg_shift' (i : A) :
f⟦-i⟧'⟦i⟧' = (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-i) i (neg_add_cancel i)).hom.app X ≫ f ≫
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-i) i (neg_add_cancel i)).inv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 (shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-i) i (neg_add_cancel i)) f).symm
theorem shift_equiv_triangle (n : A) (X : C) :
(shiftShiftNeg X n).inv⟦n⟧' ≫ (shiftNegShift (X⟦n⟧) n).hom = 𝟙 (X⟦n⟧) :=
(shiftEquiv C n).functor_unitIso_comp X
section
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app (n m : A) (h : n + m = 0) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n m h).hom.app X)⟦n⟧' =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C m n
(by rw [← neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_left h, add_neg_cancel])).hom.app (X⟦n⟧) := by
dsimp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId]
simpa only [Functor.map_comp, ← shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_inv_app n X,
← shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_inv_app n X]
using shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc_inv_app n m n 0 0 n h
(by rw [← neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_left h, add_neg_cancel]) (by rw [h, zero_add]) X
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app (n m : A) (h : n + m = 0) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n m h).inv.app X)⟦n⟧' =
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C m n
(by rw [← neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_left h, add_neg_cancel])).inv.app (X⟦n⟧)) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n m h).hom.app X)⟦n⟧'),
← Functor.map_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, Functor.map_id,
shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app, Iso.inv_hom_id_app]
rfl
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_add_neg_cancel_hom_app (n : A) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n (-n) (add_neg_cancel n)).hom.app X)⟦n⟧' =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-n) n (neg_add_cancel n)).hom.app (X⟦n⟧) := by
apply shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_add_neg_cancel_inv_app (n : A) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n (-n) (add_neg_cancel n)).inv.app X)⟦n⟧' =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-n) n (neg_add_cancel n)).inv.app (X⟦n⟧) := by
apply shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_neg_add_cancel_hom_app (n : A) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-n) n (neg_add_cancel n)).hom.app X)⟦-n⟧' =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n (-n) (add_neg_cancel n)).hom.app (X⟦-n⟧) := by
apply shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_hom_app
theorem shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_neg_add_cancel_inv_app (n : A) (X : C) :
((shiftFunctorCompIsoId C (-n) n (neg_add_cancel n)).inv.app X)⟦-n⟧' =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n (-n) (add_neg_cancel n)).inv.app (X⟦-n⟧) := by
apply shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app
end
section
variable (A)
lemma shiftFunctorCompIsoId_zero_zero_hom_app (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C 0 0 (add_zero 0)).hom.app X =
((shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app X)⟦0⟧' ≫ (shiftFunctorZero C A).hom.app X := by
simp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId, shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_inv_app]
lemma shiftFunctorCompIsoId_zero_zero_inv_app (X : C) :
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C 0 0 (add_zero 0)).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app X ≫ ((shiftFunctorZero C A).inv.app X)⟦0⟧' := by
simp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId, shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_hom_app]
end
section
variable (m n p m' n' p' : A) (hm : m' + m = 0) (hn : n' + n = 0) (hp : p' + p = 0)
(h : m + n = p)
lemma shiftFunctorCompIsoId_add'_inv_app :
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C p' p hp).inv.app X =
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C n' n hn).inv.app X ≫
(shiftFunctorCompIsoId C m' m hm).inv.app (X⟦n'⟧)⟦n⟧' ≫
(shiftFunctorAdd' C m n p h).inv.app (X⟦n'⟧⟦m'⟧) ≫
((shiftFunctorAdd' C n' m' p'
(by rw [← add_left_inj p, hp, ← h, add_assoc,
← add_assoc m', hm, zero_add, hn])).inv.app X)⟦p⟧' := by
| dsimp [shiftFunctorCompIsoId]
simp only [Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
congr 1
rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Shift/Basic.lean | 514 | 517 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
/-!
# `WithBot ℕ`
Lemmas about the type of natural numbers with a bottom element adjoined.
-/
namespace Nat
namespace WithBot
instance : WellFoundedRelation (WithBot ℕ) where
rel := (· < ·)
wf := IsWellFounded.wf
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {n m : WithBot ℕ} : n + m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 0 := by
cases n
· simp [WithBot.bot_add]
cases m
· simp [WithBot.add_bot]
simp [← WithBot.coe_add, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg]
theorem add_eq_one_iff {n m : WithBot ℕ} : n + m = 1 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 0 := by
cases n
· simp only [WithBot.bot_add, WithBot.bot_ne_one, WithBot.bot_ne_zero, false_and, or_self]
cases m
· simp [WithBot.add_bot]
simp [← WithBot.coe_add, Nat.add_eq_one_iff]
theorem add_eq_two_iff {n m : WithBot ℕ} :
n + m = 2 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 2 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 2 ∧ m = 0 := by
cases n
· simp [WithBot.bot_add]
cases m
· simp [WithBot.add_bot]
simp [← WithBot.coe_add, Nat.add_eq_two_iff]
theorem add_eq_three_iff {n m : WithBot ℕ} :
n + m = 3 ↔ n = 0 ∧ m = 3 ∨ n = 1 ∧ m = 2 ∨ n = 2 ∧ m = 1 ∨ n = 3 ∧ m = 0 := by
cases n
· simp [WithBot.bot_add]
cases m
· simp [WithBot.add_bot]
simp [← WithBot.coe_add, Nat.add_eq_three_iff]
theorem coe_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ (n : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [← WithBot.coe_zero, cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_le_coe]
exact n.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem lt_zero_iff {n : WithBot ℕ} : n < 0 ↔ n = ⊥ := WithBot.lt_coe_bot
theorem one_le_iff_zero_lt {x : WithBot ℕ} : 1 ≤ x ↔ 0 < x := by
refine ⟨zero_lt_one.trans_le, fun h => ?_⟩
cases x
· exact (not_lt_bot h).elim
· rwa [← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← Nat.add_one_le_iff, zero_add,
← WithBot.coe_le_coe, WithBot.coe_one] at h
theorem lt_one_iff_le_zero {x : WithBot ℕ} : x < 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mp (by simpa using one_le_iff_zero_lt)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {n m : WithBot ℕ} (h : n < m) : n + 1 ≤ m := by
cases n
· simp only [WithBot.bot_add, bot_le]
cases m
· exact (not_lt_bot h).elim
· rwa [WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← Nat.add_one_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_le_coe, WithBot.coe_add,
WithBot.coe_one] at h
end WithBot
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/WithBot.lean | 83 | 89 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Commute
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Even and odd elements in rings
This file defines odd elements and proves some general facts about even and odd elements of rings.
As opposed to `Even`, `Odd` does not have a multiplicative counterpart.
## TODO
Try to generalize `Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas whose `Semiring`
assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary. If that turns out to be true, they could be moved
to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even`.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even` for the definition of even elements.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered OrderedRing
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma Even.neg_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul, neg_sq]
lemma Even.neg_one_pow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a : α} {n : ℤ}
lemma Even.neg_zpow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [← Int.two_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_two, neg_mul_neg]
lemma Even.neg_one_zpow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_zpow, one_zpow]
end DivisionMonoid
@[simp] lemma IsSquare.zero [MulZeroClass α] : IsSquare (0 : α) := ⟨0, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [Semiring β] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma even_iff_exists_two_mul : Even a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b := by simp [even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma even_iff_two_dvd : Even a ↔ 2 ∣ a := by simp [Even, Dvd.dvd, two_mul]
alias ⟨Even.two_dvd, _⟩ := even_iff_two_dvd
lemma Even.trans_dvd (ha : Even a) (hab : a ∣ b) : Even b :=
even_iff_two_dvd.2 <| ha.two_dvd.trans hab
lemma Dvd.dvd.even (hab : a ∣ b) (ha : Even a) : Even b := ha.trans_dvd hab
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul (α) [NonAssocSemiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x) = {a | Even a} := by
ext x
simp [eq_comm, two_mul, Even]
@[simp] lemma even_two : Even (2 : α) := ⟨1, by rw [one_add_one_eq_two]⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_left (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (b * a) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft _)
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_right (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (a * b) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight _)
lemma even_two_mul (a : α) : Even (2 * a) := ⟨a, two_mul _⟩
lemma Even.pow_of_ne_zero (ha : Even a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → Even (a ^ n)
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.mul_left _
/-- An element `a` of a semiring is odd if there exists `k` such `a = 2*k + 1`. -/
def Odd (a : α) : Prop := ∃ k, a = 2 * k + 1
lemma odd_iff_exists_bit1 : Odd a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b + 1 := exists_congr fun b ↦ by rw [two_mul]
alias ⟨Odd.exists_bit1, _⟩ := odd_iff_exists_bit1
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul_add_one (α : Type*) [Semiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x + 1) = {a | Odd a} := by ext x; simp [Odd, eq_comm]
lemma Even.add_odd : Even a → Odd b → Odd (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a + b, by rw [mul_add, ← two_mul, add_assoc]⟩
lemma Even.odd_add (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (b + a) := add_comm a b ▸ ha.add_odd hb
lemma Odd.add_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a + b) := add_comm a b ▸ hb.add_odd ha
lemma Odd.add_odd : Odd a → Odd b → Even (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + b + 1, ?_⟩
rw [two_mul, two_mul]
ac_rfl
@[simp] lemma odd_one : Odd (1 : α) :=
⟨0, (zero_add _).symm.trans (congr_arg (· + (1 : α)) (mul_zero _).symm)⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.add_one (h : Even a) : Odd (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Even.one_add (h : Even a) : Odd (1 + a) := h.odd_add odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.add_one (h : Odd a) : Even (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.one_add (h : Odd a) : Even (1 + a) := odd_one.add_odd h
lemma odd_two_mul_add_one (a : α) : Odd (2 * a + 1) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma odd_add_self_one' : Odd (a + (a + 1)) := by simp [← add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self : Odd (a + 1 + a) := by simp [add_comm _ a]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self' : Odd (a + (1 + a)) := by simp [add_comm 1 a]
lemma Odd.map [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F) : Odd a → Odd (f a) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨f a, by simp [two_mul]⟩
lemma Odd.natCast {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Odd (n : R) :=
hn.map <| Nat.castRingHom R
@[simp] lemma Odd.mul : Odd a → Odd b → Odd (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨2 * a * b + b + a, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, add_mul, mul_one, ← add_assoc, one_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc,
← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_comm]
lemma Odd.pow (ha : Odd a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Odd (a ^ n)
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact odd_one
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.pow.mul ha
lemma Odd.pow_add_pow_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd α] (hn : Odd n) (hab : a + b = 0) :
a ^ n + b ^ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
induction k with | zero => simpa | succ k ih => ?_
have : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := add_right_cancel <|
calc
a ^ 2 + a * b = 0 := by rw [sq, ← mul_add, hab, mul_zero]
_ = b ^ 2 + a * b := by rw [sq, ← add_mul, add_comm, hab, zero_mul]
refine add_right_cancel (b := b ^ (2 * k + 1) * a ^ 2) ?_
calc
_ = (a ^ (2 * k + 1) + b ^ (2 * k + 1)) * a ^ 2 + b ^ (2 * k + 3) := by
rw [add_mul, ← pow_add, add_right_comm]; rfl
_ = _ := by rw [ih, zero_mul, zero_add, zero_add, this, ← pow_add]
end Semiring
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ}
lemma Odd.neg_pow : Odd n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = -a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul, neg_sq, pow_one, mul_neg]
@[simp] lemma Odd.neg_one_pow (h : Odd n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
| end Monoid
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Parity.lean | 167 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
/-!
# Basic lemmas about ordered rings
-/
-- We should need only a minimal development of sets in order to get here.
assert_not_exists Set.Subsingleton
open Function Int
variable {α M R : Type*}
theorem IsSquare.nonneg [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsRightCancelAdd R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [PosMulMono R] [AddLeftStrictMono R]
{x : R} (h : IsSquare x) : 0 ≤ x := by
rcases h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact mul_self_nonneg y
namespace MonoidHom
variable [Ring R] [Monoid M] [LinearOrder M] [MulLeftMono M] (f : R →* M)
theorem map_neg_one : f (-1) = 1 :=
(pow_eq_one_iff (Nat.succ_ne_zero 1)).1 <| by rw [← map_pow, neg_one_sq, map_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_neg (x : R) : f (-x) = f x := by rw [← neg_one_mul, map_mul, map_neg_one, one_mul]
theorem map_sub_swap (x y : R) : f (x - y) = f (y - x) := by rw [← map_neg, neg_sub]
end MonoidHom
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b x y : R} {n : ℕ}
theorem pow_add_pow_le (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n + y ^ n ≤ (x + y) ^ n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_one_of_ne_zero hn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction k with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, pow_one, le_refl]
| succ k ih =>
let n := k.succ
have h1 := add_nonneg (mul_nonneg hx (pow_nonneg hy n)) (mul_nonneg hy (pow_nonneg hx n))
have h2 := add_nonneg hx hy
calc
x ^ (n + 1) + y ^ (n + 1) ≤ x * x ^ n + y * y ^ n + (x * y ^ n + y * x ^ n) := by
rw [pow_succ' _ n, pow_succ' _ n]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right h1
_ = (x + y) * (x ^ n + y ^ n) := by
rw [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, add_comm (y * x ^ n), ← add_assoc, ← add_assoc,
add_assoc (x * x ^ n) (x * y ^ n), add_comm (x * y ^ n) (y * y ^ n), ← add_assoc]
_ ≤ (x + y) ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [pow_succ' _ n]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (ih (Nat.succ_ne_zero k)) h2
attribute [bound] pow_le_one₀ one_le_pow₀
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_le_pow_left {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ n, a ^ n ≤ b ^ n :=
pow_le_pow_left₀ ha hab
lemma pow_add_pow_le' (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ^ n + b ^ n ≤ 2 * (a + b) ^ n := by
rw [two_mul]
exact add_le_add (pow_le_pow_left₀ ha (le_add_of_nonneg_right hb) _)
(pow_le_pow_left₀ hb (le_add_of_nonneg_left ha) _)
end OrderedSemiring
section StrictOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a x y : R} {n m : ℕ}
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_left (h : x < y) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → x ^ n < y ^ n :=
pow_lt_pow_left₀ h hx
@[deprecated pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_left_strictMonoOn (hn : n ≠ 0) : StrictMonoOn (· ^ n : R → R) {a | 0 ≤ a} :=
pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ hn
@[deprecated pow_right_strictMono₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_right_strictMono (h : 1 < a) : StrictMono (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_strictMono₀ h
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_right (h : 1 < a) (hmn : m < n) : a ^ m < a ^ n :=
pow_lt_pow_right₀ h hmn
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff_right (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n < a ^ m ↔ n < m := pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀ h
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_le_pow_iff_right (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m ↔ n ≤ m := pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ h
@[deprecated lt_self_pow₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem lt_self_pow (h : 1 < a) (hm : 1 < m) : a < a ^ m := lt_self_pow₀ h hm
@[deprecated pow_right_strictAnti₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_right_strictAnti (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : StrictAnti (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_strictAnti₀ h₀ h₁
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : a ^ m < a ^ n ↔ n < m :=
pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) (hmn : m < n) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁ hmn
@[deprecated pow_lt_self_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_self_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) (hn : 1 < n) : a ^ n < a :=
pow_lt_self_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁ hn
end StrictOrderedSemiring
section StrictOrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a : R}
lemma sq_pos_of_neg (ha : a < 0) : 0 < a ^ 2 := by rw [sq]; exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha ha
end StrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_iff_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_le_pow_iff_left (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n ↔ a ≤ b :=
pow_le_pow_iff_left₀ ha hb hn
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff_left (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n < b ^ n ↔ a < b :=
pow_lt_pow_iff_left₀ ha hb hn
@[deprecated pow_right_injective₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_right_injective (ha₀ : 0 < a) (ha₁ : a ≠ 1) : Injective (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_injective₀ ha₀ ha₁
@[deprecated pow_right_inj₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_right_inj (ha₀ : 0 < a) (ha₁ : a ≠ 1) : a ^ m = a ^ n ↔ m = n := pow_right_inj₀ ha₀ ha₁
@[deprecated sq_le_one_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_le_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a ^ 2 ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := sq_le_one_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated sq_lt_one_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_lt_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a ^ 2 < 1 ↔ a < 1 := sq_lt_one_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated one_le_sq_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem one_le_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ a ^ 2 ↔ 1 ≤ a := one_le_sq_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated one_lt_sq_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem one_lt_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 < a ^ 2 ↔ 1 < a := one_lt_sq_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n < b ^ n) : a < b :=
lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ n hb h
@[deprecated le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem le_of_pow_le_pow_left (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ hn hb h
@[deprecated sq_eq_sq₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_eq_sq {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ a = b := sq_eq_sq₀ ha hb
@[deprecated lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a * a < b * b → a < b :=
lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self₀ hb
/-- A function `f : α → R` is nonarchimedean if it satisfies the ultrametric inequality
`f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)` for all `a b : α`. -/
def IsNonarchimedean {α : Type*} [Add α] (f : α → R) : Prop := ∀ a b : α, f (a + b) ≤ f a ⊔ f b
/-!
### Lemmas for canonically linear ordered semirings or linear ordered rings
The slightly unusual typeclass assumptions `[LinearOrderedSemiring R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]` cover two
more familiar settings:
* `[LinearOrderedRing R]`, eg `ℤ`, `ℚ` or `ℝ`
* `[CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemiring R]` (although we don't actually have this typeclass), eg `ℕ`,
`ℚ≥0` or `ℝ≥0`
-/
variable [ExistsAddOfLE R]
lemma add_sq_le : (a + b) ^ 2 ≤ 2 * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) := by
calc
(a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + (a * b + b * a) := by
simp_rw [pow_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, add_mul, mul_add, add_comm (b * a), add_add_add_comm]
_ ≤ a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + (a * a + b * b) := add_le_add_left ?_ _
_ = _ := by simp_rw [pow_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, two_mul]
cases le_total a b
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul ‹_› ‹_›
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul' ‹_› ‹_›
-- TODO: Use `gcongr`, `positivity`, `ring` once those tactics are made available here
lemma add_pow_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : ∀ n, (a + b) ^ n ≤ 2 ^ (n - 1) * (a ^ n + b ^ n)
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [pow_succ]
calc
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 1) + b ^ (n + 1)) * (a + b) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (add_pow_le ha hb (n + 1)) <| add_nonneg ha hb
_ = 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 2) + b ^ (n + 2) + (a ^ (n + 1) * b + b ^ (n + 1) * a)) := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add, add_mul, add_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ, add_comm _ (b ^ _),
add_add_add_comm, add_comm (_ * a)]
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 2) + b ^ (n + 2) + (a ^ (n + 1) * a + b ^ (n + 1) * b)) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add_left ?_ _) <| pow_nonneg (zero_le_two (α := R)) _
_ = _ := by simp only [← pow_succ, ← two_mul, ← mul_assoc]; rfl
· obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul (pow_le_pow_left₀ ha hab _) hab
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul' (pow_le_pow_left₀ hb hba _) hba
protected lemma Even.add_pow_le (hn : Even n) :
(a + b) ^ n ≤ 2 ^ (n - 1) * (a ^ n + b ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [← two_mul, pow_mul]
calc
_ ≤ (2 * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2)) ^ n := pow_le_pow_left₀ (sq_nonneg _) add_sq_le _
_ = 2 ^ n * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) ^ n := by -- TODO: Should be `Nat.cast_commute`
rw [Commute.mul_pow]; simp [Commute, SemiconjBy, two_mul, mul_two]
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (2 ^ (n - 1) * ((a ^ 2) ^ n + (b ^ 2) ^ n)) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(add_pow_le (sq_nonneg _) (sq_nonneg _) _) <| pow_nonneg (zero_le_two (α := R)) _
_ = _ := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← pow_add, ← pow_mul]
cases n
· rfl
· simp [Nat.two_mul]
lemma Even.pow_nonneg (hn : Even n) (a : R) : 0 ≤ a ^ n := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; rw [pow_add]; exact mul_self_nonneg _
lemma Even.pow_pos (hn : Even n) (ha : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n :=
(hn.pow_nonneg _).lt_of_ne' (pow_ne_zero _ ha)
lemma Even.pow_pos_iff (hn : Even n) (h₀ : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; rw [pow_add, mul_self_pos, pow_ne_zero_iff (by simpa using h₀)]
lemma Odd.pow_neg_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n < 0 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_nonneg · _), fun ha ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ((even_two_mul _).pow_pos ha.ne) ha
lemma Odd.pow_nonneg_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 ≤ a ^ n ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 hn.pow_neg_iff
lemma Odd.pow_nonpos_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq, hn.pow_neg_iff, pow_eq_zero_iff]
rintro rfl; simp [Odd, eq_comm (a := 0)] at hn
lemma Odd.pow_pos_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a := lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le hn.pow_nonpos_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.pow_nonpos⟩ := Odd.pow_nonpos_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.pow_neg⟩ := Odd.pow_neg_iff
lemma Odd.strictMono_pow (hn : Odd n) : StrictMono fun a : R => a ^ n := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp [Odd, eq_comm (a := 0)] at hn
intro a b hab
obtain ha | ha := le_total 0 a
· exact pow_lt_pow_left₀ hab ha hn₀
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 0 b
· exact (hn.pow_nonpos ha).trans_lt (pow_pos hb _)
obtain ⟨c, hac⟩ := exists_add_of_le ha
obtain ⟨d, hbd⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
have hd := nonneg_of_le_add_right (hb.trans_eq hbd)
refine lt_of_add_lt_add_right (a := c ^ n + d ^ n) ?_
dsimp
calc
a ^ n + (c ^ n + d ^ n) = d ^ n := by
rw [← add_assoc, hn.pow_add_pow_eq_zero hac.symm, zero_add]
_ < c ^ n := pow_lt_pow_left₀ ?_ hd hn₀
_ = b ^ n + (c ^ n + d ^ n) := by rw [add_left_comm, hn.pow_add_pow_eq_zero hbd.symm, add_zero]
refine lt_of_add_lt_add_right (a := a + b) ?_
rwa [add_rotate', ← hbd, add_zero, add_left_comm, ← add_assoc, ← hac, zero_add]
lemma Odd.pow_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Injective (· ^ n : R → R) :=
hn.strictMono_pow.injective
lemma Odd.pow_lt_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n < b ^ n ↔ a < b :=
hn.strictMono_pow.lt_iff_lt
lemma Odd.pow_le_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n ↔ a ≤ b :=
hn.strictMono_pow.le_iff_le
lemma Odd.pow_inj {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ a = b :=
hn.pow_injective.eq_iff
lemma sq_pos_iff {a : R} : 0 < a ^ 2 ↔ a ≠ 0 := even_two.pow_pos_iff two_ne_zero
alias ⟨_, sq_pos_of_ne_zero⟩ := sq_pos_iff
alias pow_two_pos_of_ne_zero := sq_pos_of_ne_zero
lemma pow_four_le_pow_two_of_pow_two_le (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b) : a ^ 4 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
(pow_mul a 2 2).symm ▸ pow_le_pow_left₀ (sq_nonneg a) h 2
end LinearOrderedSemiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Basic.lean | 311 | 325 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
/-- Although `fun x => x ^ r` for fixed `r` is *not* complex-differentiable along the negative real
line, it is still real-differentiable, and the derivative is what one would formally expect.
See `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const` for an alternate formulation. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ -1) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
| rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← Ne] at hr
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hx.symm with (hx | hx)
· -- easy case : `0 < x`
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (e := fun y => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1))
convert HasDerivAt.div_const (𝕜 := ℂ) ?_ (r + 1) using 1
· exact (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr).symm
· convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
· -- harder case : `x < 0`
have : ∀ᶠ y : ℝ in 𝓝 x,
(y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) = (-y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) * exp (π * I * (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
refine Filter.eventually_of_mem (Iio_mem_nhds hx) fun y hy => ?_
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hy)]
refine HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hx)]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-↑y) ^ (r + 1) * exp (↑π * I * (r + 1)))
((r + 1) * (-↑x) ^ r * exp (↑π * I * r)) x by
convert this.div_const (r + 1) using 1
conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr]
rw [mul_add ((π : ℂ) * _), mul_one, exp_add, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) (-1 : ℂ),
neg_one_mul]
simp_rw [mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← ofReal_neg]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (↑(-y) : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) (-(r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) x by
convert this.neg.mul_const _ using 1; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) (-x) by
convert @HasDerivAt.scomp ℝ _ ℂ _ _ x ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this (hasDerivAt_neg x) using 1
rw [real_smul, ofReal_neg 1, ofReal_one]; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) ↑(-x) by
exact this.comp_ofReal
conv in ↑_ ^ _ => rw [(by ring : r = r + 1 - 1)]
convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id ((-x : ℝ) : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-15")] alias hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow := hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'
/-- An alternate formulation of `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ r) (r * x ^ (r - 1)) x := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 225 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Chebyshev
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
/-!
# Numerical bounds for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
This file gathers the numerical facts required by the proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.stepBound`: During the inductive step, a partition of size `n` is blown to
size at most `stepBound n`.
* `SzemerediRegularity.initialBound`: The size of the partition we start the induction with.
* `SzemerediRegularity.bound`: The upper bound on the size of the partition produced by our version
of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function Real
namespace SzemerediRegularity
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. Blowing up a partition of size `n` during
the induction results in a partition of size at most `stepBound n`. -/
def stepBound (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
n * 4 ^ n
theorem le_stepBound : id ≤ stepBound := fun n =>
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| pow_pos (by norm_num) n
theorem stepBound_mono : Monotone stepBound := fun _ _ h =>
Nat.mul_le_mul h <| Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) h
theorem stepBound_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < stepBound n ↔ 0 < n :=
mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right <| by positivity
alias ⟨_, stepBound_pos⟩ := stepBound_pos_iff
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_stepBound {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) :
(stepBound n : α) = n * 4 ^ n := by unfold stepBound; norm_cast
end SzemerediRegularity
open SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
{u : Finset α} {ε : ℝ}
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
local notation3 "a" => (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts : ℕ)
namespace SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
private theorem eps_pos {ε : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ n * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_right ((show 0 < (100 : ℝ) by norm_num).trans_le h) (by positivity))
private theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m :=
Nat.div_pos (hPα.trans' <| by unfold stepBound; gcongr; norm_num) <|
stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <| univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos
/-- Local extension for the `positivity` tactic: A few facts that are needed many times for the
proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. -/
scoped macro "sz_positivity" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ try have := m_pos ‹_›
try have := eps_pos ‹_›
positivity })
-- Original meta code
/- meta def positivity_szemeredi_regularity : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%n / step_bound (finpartition.parts %%P).card) := do
p ← to_expr
``((finpartition.parts %%P).card * 16^(finpartition.parts %%P).card ≤ %%n)
>>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``m_pos [p]
| ε := do
typ ← infer_type ε,
unify typ `(ℝ),
p ← to_expr ``(100 ≤ 4 ^ _ * %%ε ^ 5) >>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``eps_pos [p] -/
end SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m := by
sz_positivity
theorem coe_m_add_one_pos : 0 < (m : ℝ) + 1 := by positivity
theorem one_le_m_coe [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : (1 : ℝ) ≤ m :=
Nat.one_le_cast.2 <| m_pos hPα
theorem eps_pow_five_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : ↑0 < ε ^ 5 :=
pos_of_mul_pos_right ((by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 100).trans_le hPε) <| pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _
theorem eps_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp (eps_pow_five_pos hPε)
theorem hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : 100 / ε ^ 5 ≤ m :=
(div_le_of_le_mul₀ (eps_pow_five_pos hPε).le (by positivity) hPε).trans <| by
norm_cast
rwa [Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <|
univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos), stepBound, mul_left_comm, ← mul_pow]
theorem hundred_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) (hε : ε ≤ 1) : 100 ≤ m :=
mod_cast
(hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m hPα hPε).trans'
(le_div_self (by norm_num) (by sz_positivity) <| pow_le_one₀ (by sz_positivity) hε)
theorem a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card : a + 1 ≤ 4 ^ #P.parts := by
have h : 1 ≤ 4 ^ #P.parts := one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num)
rw [stepBound, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
rw [add_le_add_iff_right, tsub_le_iff_left, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.lt_div_mul_add h)
theorem card_aux₁ (hucard : #u = m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a) :
(4 ^ #P.parts - a) * m + a * (m + 1) = #u := by
rw [hucard, mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul,
Nat.sub_add_cancel ((Nat.le_succ _).trans a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card), mul_comm]
theorem card_aux₂ (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (hu : u ∈ P.parts) (hucard : #u ≠ m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a) :
(4 ^ #P.parts - (a + 1)) * m + (a + 1) * (m + 1) = #u := by
have : m * 4 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α / #P.parts := by
rw [stepBound, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
exact Nat.div_mul_le_self _ _
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le this] at hucard
rw [(hP.card_parts_eq_average hu).resolve_left hucard, mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, ← add_mul,
Nat.sub_add_cancel a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card, ← add_assoc, mul_comm,
Nat.add_sub_of_le this, card_univ]
theorem pow_mul_m_le_card_part (hP : P.IsEquipartition) (hu : u ∈ P.parts) :
(4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * m ≤ #u := by
norm_cast
rw [stepBound, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
exact (Nat.mul_div_le _ _).trans (hP.average_le_card_part hu)
variable (P ε) (l : ℕ)
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. The size of the partition by which we start
blowing. -/
noncomputable def initialBound : ℕ :=
max 7 <| max l <| ⌊log (100 / ε ^ 5) / log 4⌋₊ + 1
theorem le_initialBound : l ≤ initialBound ε l :=
(le_max_left _ _).trans <| le_max_right _ _
theorem seven_le_initialBound : 7 ≤ initialBound ε l :=
le_max_left _ _
theorem initialBound_pos : 0 < initialBound ε l :=
Nat.succ_pos'.trans_le <| seven_le_initialBound _ _
theorem hundred_lt_pow_initialBound_mul {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (l : ℕ) :
100 < ↑4 ^ initialBound ε l * ε ^ 5 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast 4, ← div_lt_iff₀ (pow_pos hε 5), lt_rpow_iff_log_lt _ zero_lt_four, ←
div_lt_iff₀, initialBound, Nat.cast_max, Nat.cast_max]
· push_cast
exact lt_max_of_lt_right (lt_max_of_lt_right <| Nat.lt_floor_add_one _)
· exact log_pos (by norm_num)
· exact div_pos (by norm_num) (pow_pos hε 5)
/-- An explicit bound on the size of the equipartition whose existence is given by Szemerédi's
regularity lemma. -/
noncomputable def bound : ℕ :=
(stepBound^[⌊4 / ε ^ 5⌋₊] <| initialBound ε l) *
16 ^ (stepBound^[⌊4 / ε ^ 5⌋₊] <| initialBound ε l)
theorem initialBound_le_bound : initialBound ε l ≤ bound ε l :=
(id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_stepBound _ _).trans <| Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| by positivity
theorem le_bound : l ≤ bound ε l :=
(le_initialBound ε l).trans <| initialBound_le_bound ε l
theorem bound_pos : 0 < bound ε l :=
(initialBound_pos ε l).trans_le <| initialBound_le_bound ε l
variable {ι 𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] {s t : Finset ι} {x : 𝕜}
theorem mul_sq_le_sum_sq (hst : s ⊆ t) (f : ι → 𝕜) (hs : x ^ 2 ≤ ((∑ i ∈ s, f i) / #s) ^ 2)
(hs' : (#s : 𝕜) ≠ 0) : (#s : 𝕜) * x ^ 2 ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i ^ 2 :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hs.trans sum_div_card_sq_le_sum_sq_div_card) <|
Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans <| (mul_div_cancel₀ _ hs').le.trans <|
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hst fun _ _ _ => sq_nonneg _
theorem add_div_le_sum_sq_div_card (hst : s ⊆ t) (f : ι → 𝕜) (d : 𝕜) (hx : 0 ≤ x)
(hs : x ≤ |(∑ i ∈ s, f i) / #s - (∑ i ∈ t, f i) / #t|) (ht : d ≤ ((∑ i ∈ t, f i) / #t) ^ 2) :
d + #s / #t * x ^ 2 ≤ (∑ i ∈ t, f i ^ 2) / #t := by
obtain hscard | hscard := ((#s).cast_nonneg : (0 : 𝕜) ≤ #s).eq_or_lt
· simpa [← hscard] using ht.trans sum_div_card_sq_le_sum_sq_div_card
have htcard : (0 : 𝕜) < #t := hscard.trans_le (Nat.cast_le.2 (card_le_card hst))
have h₁ : x ^ 2 ≤ ((∑ i ∈ s, f i) / #s - (∑ i ∈ t, f i) / #t) ^ 2 :=
sq_le_sq.2 (by rwa [abs_of_nonneg hx])
have h₂ : x ^ 2 ≤ ((∑ i ∈ s, (f i - (∑ j ∈ t, f j) / #t)) / #s) ^ 2 := by
| apply h₁.trans
rw [sum_sub_distrib, sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, sub_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hscard.ne']
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Bound.lean | 215 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) :
gcd (a ^ b - 1) (a ^ c - 1) = a ^ gcd b c - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb
· simp
replace hb : c % b < b := mod_lt c hb
rw [gcd_rec, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one, pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one, ← gcd_rec]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h,
← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + k * m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + m * k) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (k * m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (m * k + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + k * n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + n * k) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (k * n + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (n * k + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_left]
lemma add_coprime_iff_left (h : c ∣ b) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma add_coprime_iff_right (h : c ∣ a) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime b c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_left (h : a ∣ c) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_right (h : a ∣ b) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_left`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_left (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b) : Coprime a₁ b := h.coprime_dvd_left ha
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_right`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_right (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a b₂) : Coprime a b₁ :=
h.coprime_dvd_right hb
lemma Coprime.of_dvd (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b₂) : Coprime a₁ b₁ :=
(h.of_dvd_left ha).of_dvd_right hb
| @[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 172 | 173 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym] at h
exact legendreSym.prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the first argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_left {l : List ℤ} {n : ℕ} : J(l.prod | n) = (l.map fun a => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, List.map_nil, one_left]
| cons n l' ih => rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_left, ih]
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the second argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_right {a : ℤ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ n ∈ l, n ≠ 0) :
J(a | l.prod) = (l.map fun n => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, one_right, List.map_nil]
| cons n l' ih =>
have hn := hl n List.mem_cons_self
-- `n ≠ 0`
have hl' := List.prod_ne_zero fun hf => hl 0 (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hf) rfl
-- `l'.prod ≠ 0`
have h := fun m hm => hl m (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hm)
-- `∀ (m : ℕ), m ∈ l' → m ≠ 0`
rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_right' a hn hl', ih h]
/-- If `J(a | n) = -1`, then `n` has a prime divisor `p` such that `J(a | p) = -1`. -/
theorem eq_neg_one_at_prime_divisor_of_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (h : J(a | n) = -1) :
∃ p : ℕ, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ J(a | p) = -1 := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_right, CharZero.eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
have hf₀ (p) (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList) : p ≠ 0 := (Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp).ne.symm
rw [← Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hn₀, list_prod_right hf₀] at h
obtain ⟨p, hmem, hj⟩ := List.mem_map.mp (List.neg_one_mem_of_prod_eq_neg_one h)
exact ⟨p, Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, hj⟩
end jacobiSym
namespace ZMod
open jacobiSym
/-- If `J(a | b)` is `-1`, then `a` is not a square modulo `b`. -/
theorem nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : J(a | b) = -1) :
¬IsSquare (a : ZMod b) := fun ⟨r, ha⟩ => by
rw [← r.coe_valMinAbs, ← Int.cast_mul, intCast_eq_intCast_iff', ← sq] at ha
apply (by norm_num : ¬(0 : ℤ) ≤ -1)
rw [← h, mod_left, ha, ← mod_left, pow_left]
apply sq_nonneg
/-- If `p` is prime, then `J(a | p)` is `-1` iff `a` is not a square modulo `p`. -/
theorem nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] :
J(a | p) = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym]
exact legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff p
/-- If `p` is prime and `J(a | p) = 1`, then `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
theorem isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (h : J(a | p) = 1) :
IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
Classical.not_not.mp <| by rw [← nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one, h]; decide
end ZMod
/-!
### Values at `-1`, `2` and `-2`
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- If `χ` is a multiplicative function such that `J(a | p) = χ p` for all odd primes `p`,
then `J(a | b)` equals `χ b` for all odd natural numbers `b`. -/
| theorem value_at (a : ℤ) {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (χ : R →* ℤ)
(hp : ∀ (p : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime), p ≠ 2 → @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a = χ p) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = χ b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← prod_primeFactorsList hb.pos.ne', cast_list_prod, map_list_prod χ]
rw [jacobiSym, List.map_map, ← List.pmap_eq_map
fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 299 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ULift
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ToNat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
/-!
# Finite Cardinality Functions
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`.
* `ENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `ENat.card α = ⊤`.
* `PartENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number
(using the legacy definition `PartENat := Part ℕ`). If `α` is infinite, `PartENat.card α = ⊤`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Cardinal Function
noncomputable section
variable {α β : Type*}
universe u v
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as a natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `Nat.card α = 0`. -/
protected def card (α : Type*) : ℕ :=
toNat (mk α)
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_fintype_card [Fintype α] : Nat.card α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card
/-- Because this theorem takes `Fintype α` as a non-instance argument, it can be used in particular
when `Fintype.card` ends up with different instance than the one found by inference -/
theorem _root_.Fintype.card_eq_nat_card {_ : Fintype α} : Fintype.card α = Nat.card α :=
mk_toNat_eq_card.symm
lemma card_eq_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : Nat.card s = s.card := by
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
lemma card_eq_card_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Nat.card s = s.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, s.mem_toFinset]
lemma card_eq_card_finite_toFinset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card s = hs.toFinset.card := by
simp only [← Nat.card_eq_finsetCard, hs.mem_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem card_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Nat.card α = 0 := by simp [Nat.card]
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero_of_infinite [Infinite α] : Nat.card α = 0 := mk_toNat_of_infinite
lemma cast_card [Finite α] : (Nat.card α : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk α := by
rw [Nat.card, Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0]
exact Cardinal.lt_aleph0_of_finite _
lemma _root_.Set.Infinite.card_eq_zero {s : Set α} (hs : s.Infinite) : Nat.card s = 0 :=
@card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype
lemma card_eq_zero : Nat.card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α ∨ Infinite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
lemma card_ne_zero : Nat.card α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by simp [card_eq_zero, not_or]
lemma card_pos_iff : 0 < Nat.card α ↔ Nonempty α ∧ Finite α := by
simp [Nat.card, mk_eq_zero_iff, mk_lt_aleph0_iff]
@[simp] lemma card_pos [Nonempty α] [Finite α] : 0 < Nat.card α := card_pos_iff.2 ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩
theorem finite_of_card_ne_zero (h : Nat.card α ≠ 0) : Finite α := (card_ne_zero.1 h).2
theorem card_congr (f : α ≃ β) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr f
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite β] (f : α → β)
(hf : Injective f) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β := by
simpa using toNat_le_toNat (lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective hf) (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
lemma card_le_card_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [Finite α] (f : α → β)
(hf : Surjective f) : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α := by
have : lift.{u} #β ≤ lift.{v} #α := mk_le_of_surjective (ULift.map_surjective.2 hf)
simpa using toNat_le_toNat this (by simp [lt_aleph0_of_finite])
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Bijective f) : Nat.card α = Nat.card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
protected theorem bijective_iff_injective_and_card [Finite β] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Injective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
rw [Bijective, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite β
have := Fintype.ofInjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, ← Bijective,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card]
protected theorem bijective_iff_surjective_and_card [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Bijective f ↔ Surjective f ∧ Nat.card α = Nat.card β := by
classical
rw [_root_.and_comm, Bijective, and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofSurjective f h
revert h
rw [← and_congr_left_iff, ← Bijective, ← and_comm,
card_eq_fintype_card, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite β] {f : α → β}
(inj : Injective f) (hc : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_injective_and_card f).mpr
⟨inj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_injective f inj) |>.symm⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_nat_card_le [Finite α] {f : α → β}
(surj : Surjective f) (hc : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β) : Bijective f :=
(Nat.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card f).mpr
⟨surj, hc.antisymm (card_le_card_of_surjective f surj)⟩
theorem card_eq_of_equiv_fin {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (f : α ≃ Fin n) : Nat.card α = n := by
simpa only [card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_fin] using card_congr f
section Set
open Set
variable {s t : Set α}
lemma card_mono (ht : t.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t) : Nat.card s ≤ Nat.card t :=
toNat_le_toNat (mk_le_mk_of_subset h) ht.lt_aleph0
lemma card_image_le {f : α → β} (hs : s.Finite) : Nat.card (f '' s) ≤ Nat.card s :=
have := hs.to_subtype; card_le_card_of_surjective (imageFactorization f s) surjective_onto_image
lemma card_image_of_injOn {f : α → β} (hf : s.InjOn f) : Nat.card (f '' s) = Nat.card s := by
classical
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := hs.fintype
have := fintypeImage s f
simp_rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Set.card_image_of_inj_on hf]
· have := hs.to_subtype
have := (hs.image hf).to_subtype
simp [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
lemma card_image_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
Nat.card (f '' s) = Nat.card s := card_image_of_injOn hf.injOn
lemma card_image_equiv (e : α ≃ β) : Nat.card (e '' s) = Nat.card s :=
Nat.card_congr (e.image s).symm
lemma card_preimage_of_injOn {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).InjOn f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
Nat.card (f ⁻¹' s) = Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_image_of_injOn hf, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 hsf]
lemma card_preimage_of_injective {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
Nat.card (f ⁻¹' s) = Nat.card s := card_preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn hsf
@[simp] lemma card_univ : Nat.card (univ : Set α) = Nat.card α :=
card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
lemma card_range_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Nat.card (range f) = Nat.card α := by
rw [← Nat.card_preimage_of_injective hf le_rfl]
simp
end Set
/-- If the cardinality is positive, that means it is a finite type, so there is
an equivalence between `α` and `Fin (Nat.card α)`. See also `Finite.equivFin`. -/
def equivFinOfCardPos {α : Type*} (h : Nat.card α ≠ 0) : α ≃ Fin (Nat.card α) := by
cases fintypeOrInfinite α
· simpa only [card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.equivFin α
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at h
theorem card_of_subsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : Nat.card α = 1 := by
letI := Fintype.ofSubsingleton a
rw [card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton a]
theorem card_eq_one_iff_unique : Nat.card α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
Cardinal.toNat_eq_one_iff_unique
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : Nat.card α = 1 := by
simp [card_eq_one_iff_unique, *]
theorem card_eq_one_iff_exists : Nat.card α = 1 ↔ ∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y = x := by
rw [card_eq_one_iff_unique]
exact ⟨fun ⟨s, ⟨a⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, fun x ↦ s.elim x a⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨subsingleton_of_forall_eq x h, ⟨x⟩⟩⟩
theorem card_eq_two_iff : Nat.card α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ {x, y} = @Set.univ α :=
toNat_eq_ofNat.trans mk_eq_two_iff
theorem card_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : Nat.card α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x :=
toNat_eq_ofNat.trans (mk_eq_two_iff' x)
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype_true : Nat.card {_a : α // True} = Nat.card α :=
card_congr <| Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv fun _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem card_sum [Finite α] [Finite β] : Nat.card (α ⊕ β) = Nat.card α + Nat.card β := by
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofFinite β
simp_rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_sum]
@[simp]
theorem card_prod (α β : Type*) : Nat.card (α × β) = Nat.card α * Nat.card β := by
simp only [Nat.card, mk_prod, toNat_mul, toNat_lift]
@[simp]
theorem card_ulift (α : Type*) : Nat.card (ULift α) = Nat.card α :=
card_congr Equiv.ulift
@[simp]
theorem card_plift (α : Type*) : Nat.card (PLift α) = Nat.card α :=
card_congr Equiv.plift
theorem card_sigma {β : α → Type*} [Fintype α] [∀ a, Finite (β a)] :
Nat.card (Sigma β) = ∑ a, Nat.card (β a) := by
letI _ (a : α) : Fintype (β a) := Fintype.ofFinite (β a)
simp_rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_sigma]
theorem card_pi {β : α → Type*} [Fintype α] : Nat.card (∀ a, β a) = ∏ a, Nat.card (β a) := by
simp_rw [Nat.card, mk_pi, prod_eq_of_fintype, toNat_lift, map_prod]
theorem card_fun [Finite α] : Nat.card (α → β) = Nat.card β ^ Nat.card α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [Nat.card_pi, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
@[simp]
theorem card_zmod (n : ℕ) : Nat.card (ZMod n) = n := by
cases n
· exact @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ Int.infinite
· rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ZMod.card]
end Nat
namespace Set
variable {s : Set α}
lemma card_singleton_prod (a : α) (t : Set β) : Nat.card ({a} ×ˢ t) = Nat.card t := by
rw [singleton_prod, Nat.card_image_of_injective (Prod.mk_right_injective a)]
lemma card_prod_singleton (s : Set α) (b : β) : Nat.card (s ×ˢ {b}) = Nat.card s := by
rw [prod_singleton, Nat.card_image_of_injective (Prod.mk_left_injective b)]
theorem natCard_pos (hs : s.Finite) : 0 < Nat.card s ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Nat.card_eq_zero, hs.to_subtype, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.natCard_pos⟩ := natCard_pos
@[simp] lemma natCard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : Nat.card (s.graphOn f) = Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
end Set
namespace ENat
| /-- `ENat.card α` is the cardinality of `α` as an extended natural number.
If `α` is infinite, `ENat.card α = ⊤`. -/
def card (α : Type*) : ℕ∞ :=
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Finite.lean | 266 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_toList : x ∈ s.toList ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [RelSeries.toList, List.mem_ofFn', RelSeries.mem_def]
theorem subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero (hs : s.length = 0) : {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩
congr!
exact finCongr (by rw [hs, zero_add]) |>.injective <| Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _
theorem length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : s.length ≠ 0 :=
fun hs ↦ h.not_subsingleton <| subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs
theorem length_pos_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial h
theorem length_ne_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length ≠ 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨s 0, by simp [mem_def], s 1, by simp [mem_def], fun rid ↦ irrefl (s 0) ?_⟩,
length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial⟩
nth_rw 2 [rid]
convert s.step ⟨0, by omega⟩
ext
simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem length_pos (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : 0 < s.length ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| length_ne_zero irrefl
lemma length_eq_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length = 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_ne_iff, length_ne_zero irrefl, Set.not_nontrivial_iff]
/-- Start of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its head is `a₀`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def head (x : RelSeries r) : α := x 0
/-- End of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its last element is `aₙ`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def last (x : RelSeries r) : α := x <| Fin.last _
lemma apply_last (x : RelSeries r) : x (Fin.last <| x.length) = x.last := rfl
lemma head_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.head ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
lemma last_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.last ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma head_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).head = x := by simp [singleton, head]
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).last = x := by simp [singleton, last]
end
variable {r s}
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and `b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ` are two strict series
such that `r aₙ b₀`, then there is a chain of length `n + m + 1` given by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ`.
-/
@[simps length]
def append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length + 1
toFun := Fin.append p q ∘ Fin.cast (by omega)
step i := by
obtain hi | rfl | hi :=
lt_trichotomy i (Fin.castLE (by omega) (Fin.last _ : Fin (p.length + 1)))
· convert p.step ⟨i.1, hi⟩ <;> convert Fin.append_left p q _ <;> rfl
· convert connect
· convert Fin.append_left p q _
· convert Fin.append_right p q _; rfl
· set x := _; set y := _
change r (Fin.append p q x) (Fin.append p q y)
have hx : x = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <|
i.2.trans <| by omega⟩ := by
ext; dsimp [x, y]; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel']; exact hi
have hy : y = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - p.length, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (le_of_lt hi)
| (by exact i.2)⟩ := by
ext
dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm p.length 1, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel' <| le_of_lt (show p.length < i.1 from hi), add_comm]
rfl
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 260 | 265 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms between them.
The definition of a measurable space is in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of subsets closed under
complementation and countable union. A function between measurable spaces is measurable if
the preimage of each measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂`
if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`).
In particular, any collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which contains
all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection between the lattices of σ-algebras
on `α` and `β`.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is defined in terms of the
Galois connection induced by `f`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, dynkin system, π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open Set MeasureTheory
universe uι
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort uι} {s : Set α}
namespace MeasurableSpace
section Functors
variable {m m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : Set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace α) : MeasurableSpace β where
MeasurableSet' s := MeasurableSet[m] <| f ⁻¹' s
measurableSet_empty := m.measurableSet_empty
measurableSet_compl _ hs := m.measurableSet_compl _ hs
measurableSet_iUnion f hf := by simpa only [preimage_iUnion] using m.measurableSet_iUnion _ hf
lemma map_def {s : Set β} : MeasurableSet[m.map f] s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] (f ⁻¹' s) := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : m.map id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : Set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace β) : MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' s := ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s
measurableSet_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurableSet_empty, rfl⟩
measurableSet_compl := fun _ ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurableSet_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
measurableSet_iUnion s hs :=
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := Classical.axiom_of_choice hs
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun i => (hs' i).left, by simp [hs']⟩
lemma measurableSet_comap {m : MeasurableSpace β} :
MeasurableSet[m.comap f] s ↔ ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s := .rfl
theorem comap_eq_generateFrom (m : MeasurableSpace β) (f : α → β) :
m.comap f = generateFrom { t | ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ f ⁻¹' s = t } :=
(@generateFrom_measurableSet _ (.comap f m)).symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun s => ⟨fun ⟨_, hs', h⟩ => h ▸ hs', fun h => ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩ => ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, fun ⟨t, h, ht⟩ => ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨fun h _s hs => h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, heq⟩ => heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
theorem gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (MeasurableSpace.comap f) (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ =>
comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
theorem monotone_map : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ => map_mono
theorem comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
theorem monotone_comap : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.comap g) := fun _ _ h => comap_mono h
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : (⊥ : MeasurableSpace α).comap g = ⊥ :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_iSup {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨆ i, m i).comap g = ⨆ i, (m i).comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top : (⊤ : MeasurableSpace α).map f = ⊤ :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp]
theorem map_iInf {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨅ i, m i).map f = ⨅ i, (m i).map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_iInf
theorem comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m :=
(gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
theorem le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g :=
(gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end Functors
@[simp] theorem map_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.map (fun _a : α ↦ b) m = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| fun s _ ↦ by rw [map_def]; by_cases h : b ∈ s <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem comap_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.comap (fun _a : α => b) m = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| by rintro _ ⟨s, -, rfl⟩; by_cases b ∈ s <;> simp [*]
theorem comap_generateFrom {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} :
(generateFrom s).comap f = generateFrom (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <|
generateFrom_le fun _t hts => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ <| mem_image_of_mem _ <| hts)
(generateFrom_le fun _t ⟨u, hu, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ ⟨u, GenerateMeasurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end MeasurableSpace
section MeasurableFunctions
open MeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Measurable.le_map, Measurable.of_le_map⟩ := measurable_iff_le_map
theorem measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias ⟨Measurable.comap_le, Measurable.of_comap_le⟩ := measurable_iff_comap_le
theorem comap_measurable {m : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) : Measurable[m.comap f] f :=
fun s hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
theorem Measurable.mono {ma ma' : MeasurableSpace α} {mb mb' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @Measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) : @Measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
fun _t ht => ha _ <| hf <| hb _ ht
lemma Measurable.iSup' {mα : ι → MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} (i₀ : ι)
(h : Measurable[mα i₀] f) :
Measurable[⨆ i, mα i] f :=
h.mono (le_iSup mα i₀) le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_left {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_left le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_right {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα'] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_right le_rfl
theorem measurable_id'' {m mα : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ mα) : @Measurable α α mα m id :=
measurable_id.mono le_rfl hm
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_from_top [MeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} : Measurable[⊤] f := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem measurable_generateFrom [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t)) : @Measurable _ _ _ (generateFrom s) f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <| generateFrom_le h
variable {f g : α → β}
section TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurable [Subsingleton α] : Measurable f := fun _ _ =>
@Subsingleton.measurableSet α _ _ _
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
fun s _ => Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
@[to_additive (attr := measurability, fun_prop)]
theorem measurable_one [One α] : Measurable (1 : β → α) :=
@measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
theorem measurable_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
Subsingleton.measurable
theorem measurable_of_empty_codomain [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
theorem measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : Measurable f := by
nontriviality β
inhabit β
convert @measurable_const α β _ _ (f default) using 2
apply hf
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_natCast [NatCast α] (n : ℕ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_intCast [IntCast α] (n : ℤ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
theorem measurable_of_countable [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) :
Measurable f := fun s _ =>
(f ⁻¹' s).to_countable.measurableSet
theorem measurable_of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_countable f
end TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : Measurable f) : ∀ n, Measurable f^[n]
| 0 => measurable_id
| n + 1 => (Measurable.iterate hf n).comp hf
variable {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage {t : Set β} (hf : Measurable f) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
protected theorem MeasurableSet.preimage {t : Set β} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability, fun_prop]
protected theorem Measurable.piecewise {_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable (piecewise s f g) := by
intro t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage]
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
/-- This is slightly different from `Measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`Measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact Measurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `Measurable.ite` by `Measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
theorem Measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a })
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
Measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.indicator [Zero β] (hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
/-- The measurability of a set `A` is equivalent to the measurability of the indicator function
which takes a constant value `b ≠ 0` on a set `A` and `0` elsewhere. -/
lemma measurable_indicator_const_iff [Zero β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
Measurable (s.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
constructor <;> intro h
· convert h (MeasurableSet.singleton (0 : β)).compl
ext a
simp [NeZero.ne b]
· exact measurable_const.indicator h
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem measurableSet_mulSupport [One β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (Function.mulSupport f) :=
hf (measurableSet_singleton 1).compl
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hf : Measurable f)
(h : Set.Countable { x | f x ≠ g x }) : Measurable g := by
intro t ht
have : g ⁻¹' t = g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x }ᶜ ∪ g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x } := by
simp [← inter_union_distrib_left]
rw [this]
refine (h.mono inter_subset_right).measurableSet.union ?_
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } = f ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } := by
ext x
simp +contextual
rw [this]
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurableSet.of_compl
end MeasurableFunctions
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generateFrom_prod_eq`. -/
def IsCountablySpanning (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ
theorem isCountablySpanning_measurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCountablySpanning { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } :=
⟨fun _ => univ, fun _ => MeasurableSet.univ, iUnion_const _⟩
/-- Rectangles of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
lemma IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Basic.lean | 729 | 738 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalities
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalitiesPow
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Add
/-!
# Mean value inequalities for integrals
In this file we prove several inequalities on integrals, notably the Hölder inequality and
the Minkowski inequality. The versions for finite sums are in `Analysis.MeanInequalities`.
## Main results
Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ≥0` functions: we prove
`∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q` conjugate real exponents
and `α → (E)NNReal` functions in two cases,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `NNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
`ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le` is a variant where the exponents are not reciprocals:
`∫ (f ^ p * g ^ q) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f ∂μ) ^ p * (∫ g ∂μ) ^ q` where `p, q ≥ 0` and `p + q = 1`.
`ENNReal.lintegral_prod_norm_pow_le` generalizes this to a finite family of functions:
`∫ (∏ i, f i ^ p i) ∂μ ≤ ∏ i, (∫ f i ∂μ) ^ p i` when the `p` is a collection
of nonnegative weights with sum 1.
Minkowski's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of measurable functions with `ℝ≥0∞` values:
we prove `(∫ (f + g)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫ g^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section LIntegral
/-!
### Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of ℝ≥0∞ and ℝ≥0 functions
We prove `∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q`
conjugate real exponents and `α → (E)NNReal` functions in several cases, the first two being useful
only to prove the more general results:
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are equal to 1,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are neither ⊤ nor 0,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `NNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Finset
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
namespace ENNReal
theorem lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_norm : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = 1)
(hg_norm : ∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = 1) : (∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤ 1 := by
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤
∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p / ENNReal.ofReal p + g a ^ q / ENNReal.ofReal q ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => young_inequality (f a) (g a) hpq
_ = 1 := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [lintegral_add_left']
· rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hf.pow_const p), lintegral_mul_const', hf_norm, hg_norm,
one_mul, one_mul, hpq.inv_add_inv_ennreal]
simp [hpq.symm.pos]
· exact (hf.pow_const _).mul_const _
/-- Function multiplied by the inverse of its p-seminorm `(∫⁻ f^p ∂μ) ^ 1/p` -/
def funMulInvSnorm (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (p : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun a =>
f a * ((∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹
theorem fun_eq_funMulInvSnorm_mul_eLpNorm {p : ℝ} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ 0) (hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) {a : α} :
f a = funMulInvSnorm f p μ a * (∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
simp [funMulInvSnorm, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, hf_nonzero, hf_top]
theorem funMulInvSnorm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : α} :
| funMulInvSnorm f p μ a ^ p = f a ^ p * (∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ := by
rw [funMulInvSnorm, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt hp0)]
suffices h_inv_rpow : ((∫⁻ c : α, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹ ^ p = (∫⁻ c : α, f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ by
rw [h_inv_rpow]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/MeanInequalities.lean | 87 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
|
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 437 | 438 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective (map_one reverseOp)
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (map_mul reverseOp a b)
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, map_add]
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) :=
(ι_range_map_lift _ _).trans (LinearMap.range_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap
(involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, Submodule.map_pow, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_involute]
end Involute
section Reverse
theorem submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (reverseEquiv : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [reverse, reverseOp, Submodule.map_comp, ι_range_map_lift, LinearMap.range_comp,
← Submodule.map_comp]
exact Submodule.map_id _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, ι_range_map_reverse]
/-- Like `Submodule.map_mul`, but with the multiplication reversed. -/
theorem submodule_map_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_mul, Submodule.map_unop_mul]
theorem submodule_comap_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_mul_reverse]
/-- Like `Submodule.map_pow` -/
theorem submodule_map_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_pow, Submodule.map_unop_pow]
theorem submodule_comap_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by
simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_pow_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_reverse (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) = evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, submodule_map_pow_reverse, ι_range_map_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_reverse (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) = evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_reverse]
end Reverse
@[simp]
theorem involute_mem_evenOdd_iff {x : CliffordAlgebra Q} {n : ZMod 2} :
involute x ∈ evenOdd Q n ↔ x ∈ evenOdd Q n :=
SetLike.ext_iff.mp (evenOdd_comap_involute Q n) x
@[simp]
theorem reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff {x : CliffordAlgebra Q} {n : ZMod 2} :
reverse x ∈ evenOdd Q n ↔ x ∈ evenOdd Q n :=
SetLike.ext_iff.mp (evenOdd_comap_reverse Q n) x
end Submodule
/-!
### Related properties of the even and odd submodules
TODO: show that these are `iff`s when `Invertible (2 : R)`.
-/
theorem involute_eq_of_mem_even {x : CliffordAlgebra Q} (h : x ∈ evenOdd Q 0) : involute x = x := by
induction x, h using even_induction with
| algebraMap r => exact AlgHom.commutes _ _
| add x y _hx _hy ihx ihy =>
rw [map_add, ihx, ihy]
| ι_mul_ι_mul m₁ m₂ x _hx ihx =>
rw [map_mul, map_mul, involute_ι, involute_ι, ihx, neg_mul_neg]
theorem involute_eq_of_mem_odd {x : CliffordAlgebra Q} (h : x ∈ evenOdd Q 1) : involute x = -x := by
induction x, h using odd_induction with
| ι m => exact involute_ι _
| add x y _hx _hy ihx ihy =>
rw [map_add, ihx, ihy, neg_add]
| ι_mul_ι_mul m₁ m₂ x _hx ihx =>
rw [map_mul, map_mul, involute_ι, involute_ι, ihx, neg_mul_neg, mul_neg]
end CliffordAlgebra
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 345 | 351 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
/-!
# Semiconjugate and commuting maps
We define the following predicates:
* `Function.Semiconj`: `f : α → β` semiconjugates `ga : α → α` to `gb : β → β` if `f ∘ ga = gb ∘ f`;
* `Function.Semiconj₂`: `f : α → β` semiconjugates a binary operation `ga : α → α → α`
to `gb : β → β → β` if `f (ga x y) = gb (f x) (f y)`;
* `Function.Commute`: `f : α → α` commutes with `g : α → α` if `f ∘ g = g ∘ f`,
or equivalently `Semiconj f g g`.
-/
namespace Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/--
We say that `f : α → β` semiconjugates `ga : α → α` to `gb : β → β` if `f ∘ ga = gb ∘ f`.
We use `∀ x, f (ga x) = gb (f x)` as the definition, so given `h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb` and
`a : α`, we have `h a : f (ga a) = gb (f a)` and `h.comp_eq : f ∘ ga = gb ∘ f`.
-/
def Semiconj (f : α → β) (ga : α → α) (gb : β → β) : Prop :=
∀ x, f (ga x) = gb (f x)
namespace Semiconj
variable {f fab : α → β} {fbc : β → γ} {ga ga' : α → α} {gb gb' : β → β} {gc : γ → γ}
/-- Definition of `Function.Semiconj` in terms of functional equality. -/
lemma _root_.Function.semiconj_iff_comp_eq : Semiconj f ga gb ↔ f ∘ ga = gb ∘ f := funext_iff.symm
protected alias ⟨comp_eq, _⟩ := semiconj_iff_comp_eq
protected theorem eq (h : Semiconj f ga gb) (x : α) : f (ga x) = gb (f x) :=
h x
/-- If `f` semiconjugates `ga` to `gb` and `ga'` to `gb'`,
then it semiconjugates `ga ∘ ga'` to `gb ∘ gb'`. -/
theorem comp_right (h : Semiconj f ga gb) (h' : Semiconj f ga' gb') :
Semiconj f (ga ∘ ga') (gb ∘ gb') := fun x ↦ by
simp only [comp_apply, h.eq, h'.eq]
/-- If `fab : α → β` semiconjugates `ga` to `gb` and `fbc : β → γ` semiconjugates `gb` to `gc`,
then `fbc ∘ fab` semiconjugates `ga` to `gc`.
See also `Function.Semiconj.comp_left` for a version with reversed arguments. -/
protected theorem trans (hab : Semiconj fab ga gb) (hbc : Semiconj fbc gb gc) :
Semiconj (fbc ∘ fab) ga gc := fun x ↦ by
simp only [comp_apply, hab.eq, hbc.eq]
/-- If `fbc : β → γ` semiconjugates `gb` to `gc` and `fab : α → β` semiconjugates `ga` to `gb`,
then `fbc ∘ fab` semiconjugates `ga` to `gc`.
See also `Function.Semiconj.trans` for a version with reversed arguments.
**Backward compatibility note:** before 2024-01-13,
this lemma used to have the same order of arguments that `Function.Semiconj.trans` has now. -/
theorem comp_left (hbc : Semiconj fbc gb gc) (hab : Semiconj fab ga gb) :
Semiconj (fbc ∘ fab) ga gc :=
hab.trans hbc
/-- Any function semiconjugates the identity function to the identity function. -/
theorem id_right : Semiconj f id id := fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- The identity function semiconjugates any function to itself. -/
theorem id_left : Semiconj id ga ga := fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- If `f : α → β` semiconjugates `ga : α → α` to `gb : β → β`,
`ga'` is a right inverse of `ga`, and `gb'` is a left inverse of `gb`,
then `f` semiconjugates `ga'` to `gb'` as well. -/
theorem inverses_right (h : Semiconj f ga gb) (ha : RightInverse ga' ga) (hb : LeftInverse gb' gb) :
Semiconj f ga' gb' := fun x ↦ by
rw [← hb (f (ga' x)), ← h.eq, ha x]
/-- If `f` semiconjugates `ga` to `gb` and `f'` is both a left and a right inverse of `f`,
then `f'` semiconjugates `gb` to `ga`. -/
lemma inverse_left {f' : β → α} (h : Semiconj f ga gb)
(hf₁ : LeftInverse f' f) (hf₂ : RightInverse f' f) : Semiconj f' gb ga := fun x ↦ by
rw [← hf₁.injective.eq_iff, h, hf₂, hf₂]
/-- If `f : α → β` semiconjugates `ga : α → α` to `gb : β → β`,
then `Option.map f` semiconjugates `Option.map ga` to `Option.map gb`. -/
theorem option_map {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β} (h : Semiconj f ga gb) :
Semiconj (Option.map f) (Option.map ga) (Option.map gb)
| none => rfl
| some _ => congr_arg some <| h _
end Semiconj
/--
Two maps `f g : α → α` commute if `f (g x) = g (f x)` for all `x : α`.
Given `h : Function.commute f g` and `a : α`, we have `h a : f (g a) = g (f a)` and
`h.comp_eq : f ∘ g = g ∘ f`.
-/
protected def Commute (f g : α → α) : Prop :=
Semiconj f g g
open Function (Commute)
/-- Reinterpret `Function.Semiconj f g g` as `Function.Commute f g`. These two predicates are
definitionally equal but have different dot-notation lemmas. -/
theorem Semiconj.commute {f g : α → α} (h : Semiconj f g g) : Commute f g := h
namespace Commute
variable {f f' g g' : α → α}
/-- Reinterpret `Function.Commute f g` as `Function.Semiconj f g g`. These two predicates are
definitionally equal but have different dot-notation lemmas. -/
theorem semiconj (h : Commute f g) : Semiconj f g g := h
@[refl]
theorem refl (f : α → α) : Commute f f := fun _ ↦ Eq.refl _
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : Commute f g) : Commute g f := fun x ↦ (h x).symm
/-- If `f` commutes with `g` and `g'`, then it commutes with `g ∘ g'`. -/
theorem comp_right (h : Commute f g) (h' : Commute f g') : Commute f (g ∘ g') :=
Semiconj.comp_right h h'
/-- If `f` and `f'` commute with `g`, then `f ∘ f'` commutes with `g` as well. -/
nonrec theorem comp_left (h : Commute f g) (h' : Commute f' g) : Commute (f ∘ f') g :=
h.comp_left h'
/-- Any self-map commutes with the identity map. -/
theorem id_right : Commute f id := Semiconj.id_right
/-- The identity map commutes with any self-map. -/
theorem id_left : Commute id f :=
Semiconj.id_left
/-- If `f` commutes with `g`, then `Option.map f` commutes with `Option.map g`. -/
nonrec theorem option_map {f g : α → α} (h : Commute f g) : Commute (Option.map f) (Option.map g) :=
h.option_map
end Commute
/--
A map `f` semiconjugates a binary operation `ga` to a binary operation `gb` if
for all `x`, `y` we have `f (ga x y) = gb (f x) (f y)`. E.g., a `MonoidHom`
semiconjugates `(*)` to `(*)`.
-/
def Semiconj₂ (f : α → β) (ga : α → α → α) (gb : β → β → β) : Prop :=
∀ x y, f (ga x y) = gb (f x) (f y)
namespace Semiconj₂
variable {f : α → β} {ga : α → α → α} {gb : β → β → β}
protected theorem eq (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) (x y : α) : f (ga x y) = gb (f x) (f y) :=
h x y
protected theorem comp_eq (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) : bicompr f ga = bicompl gb f f :=
funext fun x ↦ funext <| h x
theorem id_left (op : α → α → α) : Semiconj₂ id op op := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp {f' : β → γ} {gc : γ → γ → γ} (hf' : Semiconj₂ f' gb gc) (hf : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) :
Semiconj₂ (f' ∘ f) ga gc := fun x y ↦ by simp only [hf'.eq, hf.eq, comp_apply]
theorem isAssociative_right [Std.Associative ga] (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) (h_surj : Surjective f) :
Std.Associative gb :=
⟨h_surj.forall₃.2 fun x₁ x₂ x₃ ↦ by simp only [← h.eq, Std.Associative.assoc (op := ga)]⟩
theorem isAssociative_left [Std.Associative gb] (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) (h_inj : Injective f) :
Std.Associative ga :=
⟨fun x₁ x₂ x₃ ↦ h_inj <| by simp only [h.eq, Std.Associative.assoc (op := gb)]⟩
theorem isIdempotent_right [Std.IdempotentOp ga] (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) (h_surj : Surjective f) :
Std.IdempotentOp gb :=
⟨h_surj.forall.2 fun x ↦ by simp only [← h.eq, Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent (op := ga)]⟩
theorem isIdempotent_left [Std.IdempotentOp gb] (h : Semiconj₂ f ga gb) (h_inj : Injective f) :
Std.IdempotentOp ga :=
⟨fun x ↦ h_inj <| by rw [h.eq, Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent (op := gb)]⟩
end Semiconj₂
end Function
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Conjugate.lean | 199 | 201 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Centralizer
/-!
# Conjugation action of a group on itself
This file defines the conjugation action of a group on itself. See also `MulAut.conj` for
the definition of conjugation as a homomorphism into the automorphism group.
## Main definitions
A type alias `ConjAct G` is introduced for a group `G`. The group `ConjAct G` acts on `G`
by conjugation. The group `ConjAct G` also acts on any normal subgroup of `G` by conjugation.
As a generalization, this also allows:
* `ConjAct Mˣ` to act on `M`, when `M` is a `Monoid`
* `ConjAct G₀` to act on `G₀`, when `G₀` is a `GroupWithZero`
## Implementation Notes
The scalar action in defined in this file can also be written using `MulAut.conj g • h`. This
has the advantage of not using the type alias `ConjAct`, but the downside of this approach
is that some theorems about the group actions will not apply when since this
`MulAut.conj g • h` describes an action of `MulAut G` on `G`, and not an action of `G`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable (α M G : Type*)
/-- A type alias for a group `G`. `ConjAct G` acts on `G` by conjugation -/
def ConjAct : Type _ :=
G
namespace ConjAct
open MulAction Subgroup
variable {M G}
instance [Group G] : Group (ConjAct G) := ‹Group G›
instance [DivInvMonoid G] : DivInvMonoid (ConjAct G) := ‹DivInvMonoid G›
instance [Fintype G] : Fintype (ConjAct G) := ‹Fintype G›
@[simp]
theorem card [Fintype G] : Fintype.card (ConjAct G) = Fintype.card G :=
rfl
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
instance : Inhabited (ConjAct G) :=
⟨1⟩
/-- Reinterpret `g : ConjAct G` as an element of `G`. -/
def ofConjAct : ConjAct G ≃* G where
toFun := id
invFun := id
left_inv := fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Reinterpret `g : G` as an element of `ConjAct G`. -/
def toConjAct : G ≃* ConjAct G :=
ofConjAct.symm
/-- A recursor for `ConjAct`, for use as `induction x` when `x : ConjAct G`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected def rec {C : ConjAct G → Sort*} (h : ∀ g, C (toConjAct g)) : ∀ g, C g :=
h
@[simp]
theorem «forall» (p : ConjAct G → Prop) : (∀ x : ConjAct G, p x) ↔ ∀ x : G, p (toConjAct x) :=
id Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_mul_symm_eq : (@ofConjAct G _).symm = toConjAct :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem to_mul_symm_eq : (@toConjAct G _).symm = ofConjAct :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toConjAct_ofConjAct (x : ConjAct G) : toConjAct (ofConjAct x) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofConjAct_toConjAct (x : G) : ofConjAct (toConjAct x) = x :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem ofConjAct_one : ofConjAct (1 : ConjAct G) = 1 :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem toConjAct_one : toConjAct (1 : G) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofConjAct_inv (x : ConjAct G) : ofConjAct x⁻¹ = (ofConjAct x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toConjAct_inv (x : G) : toConjAct x⁻¹ = (toConjAct x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem ofConjAct_mul (x y : ConjAct G) : ofConjAct (x * y) = ofConjAct x * ofConjAct y :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): removed `simp` attribute because `simpNF` says it can prove it
theorem toConjAct_mul (x y : G) : toConjAct (x * y) = toConjAct x * toConjAct y :=
rfl
instance : SMul (ConjAct G) G where smul g h := ofConjAct g * h * (ofConjAct g)⁻¹
theorem smul_def (g : ConjAct G) (h : G) : g • h = ofConjAct g * h * (ofConjAct g)⁻¹ :=
rfl
theorem toConjAct_smul (g h : G) : toConjAct g • h = g * h * g⁻¹ :=
rfl
end DivInvMonoid
section Units
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M]
instance unitsScalar : SMul (ConjAct Mˣ) M where smul g h := ofConjAct g * h * ↑(ofConjAct g)⁻¹
theorem units_smul_def (g : ConjAct Mˣ) (h : M) : g • h = ofConjAct g * h * ↑(ofConjAct g)⁻¹ :=
rfl
instance unitsMulDistribMulAction : MulDistribMulAction (ConjAct Mˣ) M where
one_smul := by simp [units_smul_def]
mul_smul := by simp [units_smul_def, mul_assoc]
smul_mul := by simp [units_smul_def, mul_assoc]
smul_one := by simp [units_smul_def]
instance unitsSMulCommClass [SMul α M] [SMulCommClass α M M] [IsScalarTower α M M] :
SMulCommClass α (ConjAct Mˣ) M where
smul_comm a um m := by rw [units_smul_def, units_smul_def, mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc]
instance unitsSMulCommClass' [SMul α M] [SMulCommClass M α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] :
SMulCommClass (ConjAct Mˣ) α M :=
haveI : SMulCommClass α M M := SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
end Monoid
end Units
variable [Group G]
-- todo: this file is not in good order; I will refactor this after the PR
instance : MulDistribMulAction (ConjAct G) G where
smul_mul := by simp [smul_def]
smul_one := by simp [smul_def]
one_smul := by simp [smul_def]
mul_smul := by simp [smul_def, mul_assoc]
instance smulCommClass [SMul α G] [SMulCommClass α G G] [IsScalarTower α G G] :
SMulCommClass α (ConjAct G) G where
smul_comm a ug g := by rw [smul_def, smul_def, mul_smul_comm, smul_mul_assoc]
instance smulCommClass' [SMul α G] [SMulCommClass G α G] [IsScalarTower α G G] :
SMulCommClass (ConjAct G) α G :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm G α G
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
theorem smul_eq_mulAut_conj (g : ConjAct G) (h : G) : g • h = MulAut.conj (ofConjAct g) h :=
rfl
/-- The set of fixed points of the conjugation action of `G` on itself is the center of `G`. -/
theorem fixedPoints_eq_center : fixedPoints (ConjAct G) G = center G := by
ext x
simp [mem_center_iff, smul_def, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem mem_orbit_conjAct {g h : G} : g ∈ orbit (ConjAct G) h ↔ IsConj g h := by
rw [isConj_comm, isConj_iff, mem_orbit_iff]; rfl
theorem orbitRel_conjAct : ⇑(orbitRel (ConjAct G) G) = IsConj :=
funext₂ fun g h => by rw [orbitRel_apply, mem_orbit_conjAct]
theorem orbit_eq_carrier_conjClasses (g : G) :
orbit (ConjAct G) g = (ConjClasses.mk g).carrier := by
ext h
rw [ConjClasses.mem_carrier_iff_mk_eq, ConjClasses.mk_eq_mk_iff_isConj, mem_orbit_conjAct]
theorem stabilizer_eq_centralizer (g : G) :
stabilizer (ConjAct G) g = centralizer (zpowers (toConjAct g) : Set (ConjAct G)) :=
le_antisymm (le_centralizer_iff.mp (zpowers_le.mpr fun _ => mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul.mp)) fun _ h =>
mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h g (mem_zpowers g)).symm
theorem _root_.Subgroup.centralizer_eq_comap_stabilizer (g : G) :
Subgroup.centralizer {g} = Subgroup.comap ConjAct.toConjAct.toMonoidHom
(MulAction.stabilizer (ConjAct G) g) := by
ext k
-- NOTE: `Subgroup.mem_centralizer_iff` should probably be stated
-- with the equality in the other direction
simp only [mem_centralizer_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, ConjAct.toConjAct_smul]
rw [eq_comm]
exact Iff.symm mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
/-- As normal subgroups are closed under conjugation, they inherit the conjugation action
of the underlying group. -/
instance Subgroup.conjAction {H : Subgroup G} [hH : H.Normal] : SMul (ConjAct G) H :=
⟨fun g h => ⟨g • (h : G), hH.conj_mem h.1 h.2 (ofConjAct g)⟩⟩
theorem Subgroup.val_conj_smul {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] (g : ConjAct G) (h : H) :
↑(g • h) = g • (h : G) :=
rfl
instance Subgroup.conjMulDistribMulAction {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] :
MulDistribMulAction (ConjAct G) H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.mulDistribMulAction H.subtype Subgroup.val_conj_smul
/-- Group conjugation on a normal subgroup. Analogous to `MulAut.conj`. -/
def _root_.MulAut.conjNormal {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] : G →* MulAut H :=
(MulDistribMulAction.toMulAut (ConjAct G) H).comp toConjAct.toMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MulAut.conjNormal_apply {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] (g : G) (h : H) :
↑(MulAut.conjNormal g h) = g * h * g⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MulAut.conjNormal_symm_apply {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] (g : G) (h : H) :
↑((MulAut.conjNormal g).symm h) = g⁻¹ * h * g := by
change _ * _⁻¹⁻¹ = _
rw [inv_inv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MulAut.conjNormal_inv_apply {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] (g : G) (h : H) :
↑((MulAut.conjNormal g)⁻¹ h) = g⁻¹ * h * g :=
MulAut.conjNormal_symm_apply g h
theorem _root_.MulAut.conjNormal_val {H : Subgroup G} [H.Normal] {h : H} :
MulAut.conjNormal ↑h = MulAut.conj h :=
MulEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
instance normal_of_characteristic_of_normal {H : Subgroup G} [hH : H.Normal] {K : Subgroup H}
[h : K.Characteristic] : (K.map H.subtype).Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => by
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
exact K.apply_coe_mem_map H.subtype
⟨_, (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conjNormal b)) a).mpr ha⟩⟩
end ConjAct
section Units
variable [Monoid M]
/-- The stabilizer of `Mˣ` acting on itself by conjugation at `x : Mˣ` is exactly the
units of the centralizer of `x : M`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe_val symm_apply_val_coe]
def unitsCentralizerEquiv (x : Mˣ) :
(Submonoid.centralizer ({↑x} : Set M))ˣ ≃* MulAction.stabilizer (ConjAct Mˣ) x :=
MulEquiv.symm
{ toFun := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun u ↦ ⟨↑(ConjAct.ofConjAct u.1 : Mˣ), by
rintro x ⟨rfl⟩
have : (u : ConjAct Mˣ) • x = x := u.2
rwa [ConjAct.smul_def, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, Units.ext_iff, eq_comm] at this⟩,
map_one' := rfl,
map_mul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
invFun := fun u ↦
⟨ConjAct.toConjAct (Units.map (Submonoid.centralizer ({↑x} : Set M)).subtype u), by
change _ • _ = _
simp only [ConjAct.smul_def, ConjAct.ofConjAct_toConjAct, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul]
exact Units.ext <| (u.1.2 x <| Set.mem_singleton _).symm⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ by ext; rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ by ext; rfl
map_mul' := map_mul _ }
end Units
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/ConjAct.lean | 301 | 303 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 1,314 | 1,322 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly
equicontinuous on `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous at `x₀` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is very useful for
developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous on `S` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is
uniformly continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*.
This is very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly
for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is uniformly continuous on `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*. This is very useful
for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := t k) F S x₀) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold ContinuousWithinAt nhdsWithin at hk ⊢
rw [nhds_iInf]
| exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousAt (tX := t k) F x₀) :
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 573 | 576 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.