Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.MonoOver
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
/-!
# Subobjects
We define `Subobject X` as the quotient (by isomorphisms) of
`MonoOver X := {f : Over X // Mono f.hom}`.
Here `MonoOver X` is a thin category (a pair of objects has at most one morphism between them),
so we can think of it as a preorder. However as it is not skeletal, it is not a partial order.
There is a coercion from `Subobject X` back to the ambient category `C`
(using choice to pick a representative), and for `P : Subobject X`,
`P.arrow : (P : C) ⟶ X` is the inclusion morphism.
We provide
* `def pullback [HasPullbacks C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X`
* `def map (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
* `def «exists_» [HasImages C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
and prove their basic properties and relationships.
These are all easy consequences of the earlier development
of the corresponding functors for `MonoOver`.
The subobjects of `X` form a preorder making them into a category. We have `X ≤ Y` if and only if
`X.arrow` factors through `Y.arrow`: see `ofLE`/`ofLEMk`/`ofMkLE`/`ofMkLEMk` and
`le_of_comm`. Similarly, to show that two subobjects are equal, we can supply an isomorphism between
the underlying objects that commutes with the arrows (`eq_of_comm`).
See also
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru` :
an API describing factorization of morphisms through subobjects.
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.lattice` :
the lattice structures on subobjects.
## Notes
This development originally appeared in Bhavik Mehta's "Topos theory for Lean" repository,
and was ported to mathlib by Kim Morrison.
### Implementation note
Currently we describe `pullback`, `map`, etc., as functors.
It may be better to just say that they are monotone functions,
and even avoid using categorical language entirely when describing `Subobject X`.
(It's worth keeping this in mind in future use; it should be a relatively easy change here
if it looks preferable.)
### Relation to pseudoelements
There is a separate development of pseudoelements in `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`,
as a quotient (but not by isomorphism) of `Over X`.
When a morphism `f` has an image, the image represents the same pseudoelement.
In a category with images `Pseudoelements X` could be constructed as a quotient of `MonoOver X`.
In fact, in an abelian category (I'm not sure in what generality beyond that),
`Pseudoelements X` agrees with `Subobject X`, but we haven't developed this in mathlib yet.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-!
We now construct the subobject lattice for `X : C`,
as the quotient by isomorphisms of `MonoOver X`.
Since `MonoOver X` is a thin category, we use `ThinSkeleton` to take the quotient.
Essentially all the structure defined above on `MonoOver X` descends to `Subobject X`,
with morphisms becoming inequalities, and isomorphisms becoming equations.
-/
/-- The category of subobjects of `X : C`, defined as isomorphism classes of monomorphisms into `X`.
-/
def Subobject (X : C) :=
ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X)
instance (X : C) : PartialOrder (Subobject X) :=
inferInstanceAs <| PartialOrder (ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X))
namespace Subobject
-- Porting note: made it a def rather than an abbreviation
-- because Lean would make it too transparent
/-- Convenience constructor for a subobject. -/
def mk {X A : C} (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject X :=
(toThinSkeleton _).obj (MonoOver.mk' f)
section
attribute [local ext] CategoryTheory.Comma
protected theorem ind {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], p (Subobject.mk f)) (P : Subobject X) : p P := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn'
intro a
exact h a.arrow
protected theorem ind₂ {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g],
p (Subobject.mk f) (Subobject.mk g))
(P Q : Subobject X) : p P Q := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn₂'
intro a b
exact h a.arrow b.arrow
end
/-- Declare a function on subobjects of `X` by specifying a function on monomorphisms with
codomain `X`. -/
protected def lift {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α)
(h :
∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A ≅ B),
i.hom ≫ g = f → F f = F g) :
Subobject X → α := fun P =>
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun m => F m.arrow) fun m n ⟨i⟩ =>
h m.arrow n.arrow ((MonoOver.forget X ⋙ Over.forget X).mapIso i) (Over.w i.hom)
@[simp]
protected theorem lift_mk {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α) {h A}
(f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject.lift F h (Subobject.mk f) = F f :=
rfl
/-- The category of subobjects is equivalent to the `MonoOver` category. It is more convenient to
use the former due to the partial order instance, but oftentimes it is easier to define structures
on the latter. -/
noncomputable def equivMonoOver (X : C) : Subobject X ≌ MonoOver X :=
ThinSkeleton.equivalence _
/-- Use choice to pick a representative `MonoOver X` for each `Subobject X`.
-/
noncomputable def representative {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ MonoOver X :=
(equivMonoOver X).functor
instance : (representative (X := X)).IsEquivalence :=
(equivMonoOver X).isEquivalence_functor
/-- Starting with `A : MonoOver X`, we can take its equivalence class in `Subobject X`
then pick an arbitrary representative using `representative.obj`.
This is isomorphic (in `MonoOver X`) to the original `A`.
-/
noncomputable def representativeIso {X : C} (A : MonoOver X) :
representative.obj ((toThinSkeleton _).obj A) ≅ A :=
(equivMonoOver X).counitIso.app A
/-- Use choice to pick a representative underlying object in `C` for any `Subobject X`.
Prefer to use the coercion `P : C` rather than explicitly writing `underlying.obj P`.
-/
noncomputable def underlying {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ C :=
representative ⋙ MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _
instance : CoeOut (Subobject X) C where coe Y := underlying.obj Y
-- Porting note: removed as it has become a syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem underlying_as_coe {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : underlying.obj P = P :=
-- rfl
/-- If we construct a `Subobject Y` from an explicit `f : X ⟶ Y` with `[Mono f]`,
then pick an arbitrary choice of underlying object `(Subobject.mk f : C)` back in `C`,
it is isomorphic (in `C`) to the original `X`.
-/
noncomputable def underlyingIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (Subobject.mk f : C) ≅ X :=
(MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _).mapIso (representativeIso (MonoOver.mk' f))
/-- The morphism in `C` from the arbitrarily chosen underlying object to the ambient object.
-/
noncomputable def arrow {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : (Y : C) ⟶ X :=
(representative.obj Y).obj.hom
instance arrow_mono {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : Mono Y.arrow :=
(representative.obj Y).property
@[simp]
theorem arrow_congr {A : C} (X Y : Subobject A) (h : X = Y) :
eqToHom (congr_arg (fun X : Subobject A => (X : C)) h) ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow := by
induction h
simp
@[simp]
theorem representative_coe (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y : C) = (Y : C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem representative_arrow (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y).arrow = Y.arrow :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlying_arrow {X : C} {Y Z : Subobject X} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
underlying.map f ≫ arrow Z = arrow Y :=
Over.w (representative.map f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_arrow {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ (Subobject.mk f).arrow = f :=
Over.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).hom ≫ f = (mk f).arrow :=
(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).1 (underlyingIso_arrow f).symm
/-- Two morphisms into a subobject are equal exactly if
the morphisms into the ambient object are equal -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comp_arrow_eq {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f g : X ⟶ P}
(h : f ≫ P.arrow = g ≫ P.arrow) : f = g :=
(cancel_mono P.arrow).mp h
theorem mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂] (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
(w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) : mk f₁ ≤ mk f₂ :=
⟨MonoOver.homMk _ w⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_arrow (P : Subobject X) : mk P.arrow = P :=
Quotient.inductionOn' P fun Q => by
obtain ⟨e⟩ := @Quotient.mk_out' _ (isIsomorphicSetoid _) Q
exact Quotient.sound' ⟨MonoOver.isoMk (Iso.refl _) ≪≫ e⟩
theorem le_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C)) (w : f ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) :
X ≤ Y := by
convert mk_le_mk_of_comm _ w <;> simp
theorem le_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : (X : C) ⟶ A)
(w : g ≫ f = X.arrow) : X ≤ mk f :=
le_of_comm (g ≫ (underlyingIso f).inv) <| by simp [w]
theorem mk_le_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : A ⟶ (X : C))
(w : g ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f ≤ X :=
le_of_comm ((underlyingIso f).hom ≫ g) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem eq_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C))
(w : f.hom ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) : X = Y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_comm f.hom w) <| le_of_comm f.inv <| f.inv_comp_eq.2 w.symm
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem eq_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : (X : C) ≅ A)
(w : i.hom ≫ f = X.arrow) : X = mk f :=
eq_of_comm (i.trans (underlyingIso f).symm) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
| the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : A ≅ (X : C))
(w : i.hom ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f = X :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Basic.lean | 269 | 271 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Submodule
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finrank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.InvariantBasisNumber
/-!
# Lemmas about rank and finrank in rings satisfying strong rank condition.
## Main statements
For modules over rings satisfying the rank condition
* `Basis.le_span`:
the cardinality of a basis is bounded by the cardinality of any spanning set
For modules over rings satisfying the strong rank condition
* `linearIndependent_le_span`:
For any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
and any finite spanning set `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
* `linearIndependent_le_basis`:
If `b` is a basis for a module `M`,
and `s` is a linearly independent set,
then the cardinality of `s` is bounded by the cardinality of `b`.
For modules over rings with invariant basis number
(including all commutative rings and all noetherian rings)
* `mk_eq_mk_of_basis`: the dimension theorem, any two bases of the same vector space have the same
cardinality.
## Additional definition
* `Algebra.IsQuadraticExtension`: An extension of rings `R ⊆ S` is quadratic if `S` is a
free `R`-algebra of rank `2`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w w'
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set Module
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
section InvariantBasisNumber
variable [InvariantBasisNumber R]
/-- The dimension theorem: if `v` and `v'` are two bases, their index types
have the same cardinalities. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_basis (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) :
Cardinal.lift.{w'} #ι = Cardinal.lift.{w} #ι' := by
classical
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
cases fintypeOrInfinite ι
· -- `v` is a finite basis, so by `basis_finite_of_finite_spans` so is `v'`.
-- haveI : Finite (range v) := Set.finite_range v
haveI := basis_finite_of_finite_spans (Set.finite_range v) v.span_eq v'
cases nonempty_fintype ι'
-- We clean up a little:
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Cardinal.mk_fintype]
simp only [Cardinal.lift_natCast, Nat.cast_inj]
-- Now we can use invariant basis number to show they have the same cardinality.
apply card_eq_of_linearEquiv R
exact
(Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite R R ι).symm.trans v.repr.symm ≪≫ₗ v'.repr ≪≫ₗ
Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite R R ι'
· -- `v` is an infinite basis,
-- so by `infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent`, `v'` is at least as big,
-- and then applying `infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent` again
-- we see they have the same cardinality.
have w₁ := infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent' v _ v'.linearIndependent v'.maximal
rcases Cardinal.lift_mk_le'.mp w₁ with ⟨f⟩
haveI : Infinite ι' := Infinite.of_injective f f.2
have w₂ := infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent' v' _ v.linearIndependent v.maximal
exact le_antisymm w₁ w₂
/-- Given two bases indexed by `ι` and `ι'` of an `R`-module, where `R` satisfies the invariant
basis number property, an equiv `ι ≃ ι'`. -/
def Basis.indexEquiv (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) : ι ≃ ι' :=
(Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'.1 <| mk_eq_mk_of_basis v v').some
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_basis' {ι' : Type w} (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) : #ι = #ι' :=
Cardinal.lift_inj.1 <| mk_eq_mk_of_basis v v'
end InvariantBasisNumber
section RankCondition
variable [RankCondition R]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for `Basis.le_span`.
If `R` satisfies the rank condition,
then for any finite basis `b : Basis ι R M`,
and any finite spanning set `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
-/
theorem Basis.le_span'' {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) {w : Set M} [Fintype w]
(s : span R w = ⊤) : Fintype.card ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
-- We construct a surjective linear map `(w → R) →ₗ[R] (ι → R)`,
-- by expressing a linear combination in `w` as a linear combination in `ι`.
fapply card_le_of_surjective' R
· exact b.repr.toLinearMap.comp (Finsupp.linearCombination R (↑))
· apply Surjective.comp (g := b.repr.toLinearMap)
· apply LinearEquiv.surjective
rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, Finsupp.range_linearCombination]
simpa using s
/--
Another auxiliary lemma for `Basis.le_span`, which does not require assuming the basis is finite,
but still assumes we have a finite spanning set.
-/
theorem basis_le_span' {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M) {w : Set M} [Fintype w] (s : span R w = ⊤) :
#ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
haveI := basis_finite_of_finite_spans w.toFinite s b
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype ι]
simp only [Nat.cast_le]
exact Basis.le_span'' b s
-- Note that if `R` satisfies the strong rank condition,
-- this also follows from `linearIndependent_le_span` below.
/-- If `R` satisfies the rank condition,
then the cardinality of any basis is bounded by the cardinality of any spanning set.
-/
theorem Basis.le_span {J : Set M} (v : Basis ι R M) (hJ : span R J = ⊤) : #(range v) ≤ #J := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
cases fintypeOrInfinite J
· rw [← Cardinal.lift_le, Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective v.injective, Cardinal.mk_fintype J]
convert Cardinal.lift_le.{v}.2 (basis_le_span' v hJ)
simp
· let S : J → Set ι := fun j => ↑(v.repr j).support
let S' : J → Set M := fun j => v '' S j
have hs : range v ⊆ ⋃ j, S' j := by
intro b hb
rcases mem_range.1 hb with ⟨i, hi⟩
have : span R J ≤ comap v.repr.toLinearMap (Finsupp.supported R R (⋃ j, S j)) :=
span_le.2 fun j hj x hx => ⟨_, ⟨⟨j, hj⟩, rfl⟩, hx⟩
rw [hJ] at this
replace : v.repr (v i) ∈ Finsupp.supported R R (⋃ j, S j) := this trivial
rw [v.repr_self, Finsupp.mem_supported, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ one_ne_zero] at this
· subst b
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (this (Finset.mem_singleton_self _)) with ⟨j, hj⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨j, (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨i, hj, rfl⟩⟩
refine le_of_not_lt fun IJ => ?_
suffices #(⋃ j, S' j) < #(range v) by exact not_le_of_lt this ⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset _ _ hs⟩
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans Cardinal.mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk
(Cardinal.sum_le_sum _ (fun _ => ℵ₀) ?_)) ?_
· exact fun j => (Cardinal.lt_aleph0_of_finite _).le
· simpa
end RankCondition
section StrongRankCondition
variable [StrongRankCondition R]
open Submodule Finsupp
-- An auxiliary lemma for `linearIndependent_le_span'`,
-- with the additional assumption that the linearly independent family is finite.
theorem linearIndependent_le_span_aux' {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : ι → M)
(i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M) [Fintype w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) :
Fintype.card ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
-- We construct an injective linear map `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] (w → R)`,
-- by thinking of `f : ι → R` as a linear combination of the finite family `v`,
-- and expressing that (using the axiom of choice) as a linear combination over `w`.
-- We can do this linearly by constructing the map on a basis.
fapply card_le_of_injective' R
· apply Finsupp.linearCombination
exact fun i => Span.repr R w ⟨v i, s (mem_range_self i)⟩
· intro f g h
apply_fun linearCombination R ((↑) : w → M) at h
simp only [linearCombination_linearCombination, Submodule.coe_mk,
Span.finsupp_linearCombination_repr] at h
exact i h
/-- If `R` satisfies the strong rank condition,
then any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
contained in the span of some finite `w : Set M`,
is itself finite.
-/
lemma LinearIndependent.finite_of_le_span_finite {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v)
(w : Set M) [Finite w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) : Finite ι :=
letI := Fintype.ofFinite w
Fintype.finite <| fintypeOfFinsetCardLe (Fintype.card w) fun t => by
let v' := fun x : (t : Set ι) => v x
have i' : LinearIndependent R v' := i.comp _ Subtype.val_injective
have s' : range v' ≤ span R w := (range_comp_subset_range _ _).trans s
simpa using linearIndependent_le_span_aux' v' i' w s'
/-- If `R` satisfies the strong rank condition,
then for any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
contained in the span of some finite `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_le_span' {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M)
[Fintype w] (s : range v ≤ span R w) : #ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
haveI : Finite ι := i.finite_of_le_span_finite v w s
letI := Fintype.ofFinite ι
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype]
simp only [Nat.cast_le]
exact linearIndependent_le_span_aux' v i w s
/-- If `R` satisfies the strong rank condition,
then for any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
and any finite spanning set `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_le_span {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M)
[Fintype w] (s : span R w = ⊤) : #ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
apply linearIndependent_le_span' v i w
rw [s]
exact le_top
/-- A version of `linearIndependent_le_span` for `Finset`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_le_span_finset {ι : Type*} (v : ι → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v)
(w : Finset M) (s : span R (w : Set M) = ⊤) : #ι ≤ w.card := by
simpa only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe] using linearIndependent_le_span v i w s
/-- An auxiliary lemma for `linearIndependent_le_basis`:
we handle the case where the basis `b` is infinite.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis {ι : Type w} (b : Basis ι R M) [Infinite ι] {κ : Type w}
(v : κ → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) : #κ ≤ #ι := by
classical
by_contra h
rw [not_le, ← Cardinal.mk_finset_of_infinite ι] at h
let Φ := fun k : κ => (b.repr (v k)).support
obtain ⟨s, w : Infinite ↑(Φ ⁻¹' {s})⟩ := Cardinal.exists_infinite_fiber Φ h (by infer_instance)
let v' := fun k : Φ ⁻¹' {s} => v k
have i' : LinearIndependent R v' := i.comp _ Subtype.val_injective
have w' : Finite (Φ ⁻¹' {s}) := by
apply i'.finite_of_le_span_finite v' (s.image b)
rintro m ⟨⟨p, ⟨rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Subtype.coe_mk, Finset.coe_image]
apply Basis.mem_span_repr_support
exact w.false
/-- Over any ring `R` satisfying the strong rank condition,
if `b` is a basis for a module `M`,
and `s` is a linearly independent set,
then the cardinality of `s` is bounded by the cardinality of `b`.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_le_basis {ι : Type w} (b : Basis ι R M) {κ : Type w} (v : κ → M)
(i : LinearIndependent R v) : #κ ≤ #ι := by
classical
-- We split into cases depending on whether `ι` is infinite.
cases fintypeOrInfinite ι
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype ι] -- When `ι` is finite, we have `linearIndependent_le_span`,
haveI : Nontrivial R := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.ofInjective b b.injective)]
exact linearIndependent_le_span v i (range b) b.span_eq
· -- and otherwise we have `linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis`.
exact linearIndependent_le_infinite_basis b v i
/-- `StrongRankCondition` implies that if there is an injective linear map `(α →₀ R) →ₗ[R] β →₀ R`,
then the cardinal of `α` is smaller than or equal to the cardinal of `β`.
-/
theorem card_le_of_injective'' {α : Type v} {β : Type v} (f : (α →₀ R) →ₗ[R] β →₀ R)
(i : Injective f) : #α ≤ #β := by
let b : Basis β R (β →₀ R) := ⟨1⟩
apply linearIndependent_le_basis b (fun (i : α) ↦ f (Finsupp.single i 1))
rw [LinearIndependent]
have : (linearCombination R fun i ↦ f (Finsupp.single i 1)) = f := by ext a b; simp
exact this.symm ▸ i
/-- If `R` satisfies the strong rank condition, then for any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
and spanning set `w : Set M`, the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_le_span'' {ι : Type v} {v : ι → M} (i : LinearIndependent R v) (w : Set M)
(s : span R w = ⊤) : #ι ≤ #w := by
fapply card_le_of_injective'' (R := R)
· apply Finsupp.linearCombination
exact fun i ↦ Span.repr R w ⟨v i, s ▸ trivial⟩
· intro f g h
apply_fun linearCombination R ((↑) : w → M) at h
simp only [linearCombination_linearCombination, Submodule.coe_mk,
Span.finsupp_linearCombination_repr] at h
exact i h
/-- Let `R` satisfy the strong rank condition. If `m` elements of a free rank `n` `R`-module are
linearly independent, then `m ≤ n`. -/
theorem Basis.card_le_card_of_linearIndependent_aux {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [StrongRankCondition R]
(n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (v : Fin m → Fin n → R) : LinearIndependent R v → m ≤ n := fun h => by
simpa using linearIndependent_le_basis (Pi.basisFun R (Fin n)) v h
-- When the basis is not infinite this need not be true!
/-- Over any ring `R` satisfying the strong rank condition,
if `b` is an infinite basis for a module `M`,
then every maximal linearly independent set has the same cardinality as `b`.
This proof (along with some of the lemmas above) comes from
[Les familles libres maximales d'un module ont-elles le meme cardinal?][lazarus1973]
-/
theorem maximal_linearIndependent_eq_infinite_basis {ι : Type w} (b : Basis ι R M) [Infinite ι]
{κ : Type w} (v : κ → M) (i : LinearIndependent R v) (m : i.Maximal) : #κ = #ι := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact linearIndependent_le_basis b v i
· haveI : Nontrivial R := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
exact infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent b v i m
theorem Basis.mk_eq_rank'' {ι : Type v} (v : Basis ι R M) : #ι = Module.rank R M := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
rw [Module.rank_def]
apply le_antisymm
· trans
swap
· apply le_ciSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)
exact
⟨Set.range v, by
rw [LinearIndepOn]
convert v.reindexRange.linearIndependent
simp⟩
· exact (Cardinal.mk_range_eq v v.injective).ge
· apply ciSup_le'
rintro ⟨s, li⟩
apply linearIndependent_le_basis v _ li
theorem Basis.mk_range_eq_rank (v : Basis ι R M) : #(range v) = Module.rank R M :=
v.reindexRange.mk_eq_rank''
/-- If a vector space has a finite basis, then its dimension (seen as a cardinal) is equal to the
cardinality of the basis. -/
theorem rank_eq_card_basis {ι : Type w} [Fintype ι] (h : Basis ι R M) :
Module.rank R M = Fintype.card ι := by
classical
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
rw [← h.mk_range_eq_rank, Cardinal.mk_fintype, Set.card_range_of_injective h.injective]
theorem Basis.card_le_card_of_linearIndependent {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
{ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι'] {v : ι' → M} (hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
Fintype.card ι' ≤ Fintype.card ι := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simpa [rank_eq_card_basis b, Cardinal.mk_fintype] using hv.cardinal_lift_le_rank
| theorem Basis.card_le_card_of_submodule (N : Submodule R M) [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
[Fintype ι'] (b' : Basis ι' R N) : Fintype.card ι' ≤ Fintype.card ι :=
b.card_le_card_of_linearIndependent
(b'.linearIndependent.map_injOn N.subtype N.injective_subtype.injOn)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/StrongRankCondition.lean | 351 | 354 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition
This file contains some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition.
Most of them are generalized from the same result assuming the base ring being division ring,
and are moved from the files `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`
and `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FiniteDimensional.lean`.
-/
open Cardinal Module Module Set Submodule
universe u v
section Module
variable {K : Type u} {V : Type v} [Ring K] [StrongRankCondition K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The `ι` indexed basis on `V`, where `ι` is an empty type and `V` is zero-dimensional.
See also `Module.finBasis`.
-/
noncomputable def Basis.ofRankEqZero [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) : Basis ι K V :=
haveI : Subsingleton V := by
obtain ⟨_, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (hV ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
exact b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
Basis.empty _
@[simp]
theorem Basis.ofRankEqZero_apply [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) (i : ι) : Basis.ofRankEqZero hV i = 0 := rfl
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent [Module.Free K V] {c : Cardinal} :
c ≤ Module.rank K V ↔ ∃ s : Set V, #s = c ∧ LinearIndepOn K id s := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨κ, t'⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
let t := t'.reindexRange
have : LinearIndepOn K id (Set.range t') := by
convert t.linearIndependent.linearIndepOn_id
ext
simp [t]
rw [← t.mk_eq_rank'', le_mk_iff_exists_subset] at h
rcases h with ⟨s, hst, hsc⟩
exact ⟨s, hsc, this.mono hst⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact si.cardinal_le_rank
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset
[Module.Free K V] {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ Module.rank K V ↔
∃ s : Finset V, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndependent K ((↑) : ↥(s : Set V) → V) := by
simp only [le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl, si⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
/-- A vector space has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_le_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
constructor
· intro hd
rw [← b.mk_eq_rank'', le_one_iff_subsingleton] at hd
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty κ with hb | ⟨⟨i⟩⟩
· use 0
have h' : ∀ v : V, v = 0 := by
simpa [range_eq_empty, Submodule.eq_bot_iff] using b.span_eq.symm
intro v
simp [h' v]
· use b i
have h' : (K ∙ b i) = ⊤ :=
(subsingleton_range b).eq_singleton_of_mem (mem_range_self i) ▸ b.span_eq
intro v
have hv : v ∈ (⊤ : Submodule K V) := mem_top
rwa [← h', mem_span_singleton] at hv
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
have h : (K ∙ v₀) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp [mem_span_singleton, hv₀]
rw [← rank_top, ← h]
refine (rank_span_le _).trans_eq ?_
simp
/-- A vector space has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_eq_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨v₀, h, hv⟩ ↦ (rank_le_one_iff.2 ⟨v₀, hv⟩).antisymm ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨v₀, hv⟩ := rank_le_one_iff.1 h.le
refine ⟨v₀, fun hzero ↦ ?_, hv⟩
simp_rw [hzero, smul_zero, exists_const] at hv
haveI : Subsingleton V := .intro fun _ _ ↦ by simp_rw [← hv]
exact one_ne_zero (h ▸ rank_subsingleton' K V)
· by_contra H
rw [not_le, lt_one_iff_zero] at H
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (H ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
haveI := b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
exact h (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_le_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, h⟩
use v₀, hv₀
intro v hv
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀, h⟩
use ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]
/-- A submodule has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_eq_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨v₀, hv₀, fun h' ↦ by
simp only [h', ne_eq] at H; exact H rfl, fun v hv ↦ ?_⟩,
fun ⟨v₀, hv₀, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩,
fun h' ↦ H (by rwa [AddSubmonoid.mk_eq_zero] at h'), fun ⟨v, hv⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]⟩
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector, not necessarily in the submodule, such that the
submodule is contained in its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff' (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· rw [rank_submodule_le_one_iff]
rintro ⟨v₀, _, h⟩
exact ⟨v₀, h⟩
· rintro ⟨v₀, h⟩
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := s)
simpa [b.mk_eq_rank''] using b.linearIndependent.map' _ (ker_inclusion _ _ h)
|>.cardinal_le_rank.trans (rank_span_le {v₀})
theorem Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal (W : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K W] :
Module.rank K W ≤ 1 ↔ W.IsPrincipal := by
simp only [rank_le_one_iff, Submodule.isPrincipal_iff, le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_iff,
span_singleton_le_iff_mem]
| constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, hm'⟩
choose f hf using hm'
exact ⟨m, ⟨fun v hv => ⟨f ⟨v, hv⟩, congr_arg ((↑) : W → V) (hf ⟨v, hv⟩)⟩, hm⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
choose f hf using h
exact ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, fun v => ⟨f v.1 v.2, Subtype.ext (hf v.1 v.2)⟩⟩
theorem Module.rank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ (⊤ : Submodule K V).IsPrincipal := by
haveI := Module.Free.of_equiv (topEquiv (R := K) (M := V)).symm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/FreeAndStrongRankCondition.lean | 171 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
end equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
theorem mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal := mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage (hf : MapsTo f s t) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := hf
theorem mapsTo_iff_subset_preimage : MapsTo f s t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn => simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
lemma MapsTo.insert (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : α) : MapsTo f (insert x s) (insert (f x) t) := by
simpa [← singleton_union] using h.mono_right subset_union_right
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
end MapsTo
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
lemma InjOn.of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn f s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq ↦ h hx hy (by simp [heq])
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s ↔ InjOn g (f '' s) :=
⟨image_of_comp, fun h ↦ InjOn.comp h hf <| mapsTo_image f s⟩
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
theorem _root_.Set.InjOn.injective_iff (s : Set β) (h : InjOn g s) (hs : range f ⊆ s) :
Injective (g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨(·.of_comp), fun h _ ↦ by aesop⟩
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun _ hs _ ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (hB hs) (hB ht)).1 hst
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
lemma InjOn.image (h : s.InjOn f) : s.powerset.InjOn (image f) :=
fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ h' ↦ by rw [← h.preimage_image_inter hs₁, h', h.preimage_image_inter hs₂]
theorem InjOn.image_eq_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ = f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
h.image.eq_iff h₁ h₂
lemma InjOn.image_subset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊆ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ?_, image_subset _⟩
rw [← h.preimage_image_inter h₁, ← h.preimage_image_inter h₂]
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono h')
lemma InjOn.image_ssubset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊂ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := by
simp_rw [ssubset_def, h.image_subset_image_iff h₁ h₂, h.image_subset_image_iff h₂ h₁]
-- TODO: can this move to a better place?
theorem _root_.Disjoint.image {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : Disjoint s t) (hf : u.InjOn f)
(hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [← hf.image_inter hs ht, h, image_empty]
lemma InjOn.image_diff {t : Set α} (h : s.InjOn f) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' (s ∩ t) := by
refine subset_antisymm (subset_diff.2 ⟨image_subset f diff_subset, ?_⟩)
(diff_subset_iff.2 (by rw [← image_union, inter_union_diff]))
exact Disjoint.image disjoint_sdiff_inter h diff_subset inter_subset_left
lemma InjOn.image_diff_subset {f : α → β} {t : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t := by
rw [h.image_diff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
alias image_diff_of_injOn := InjOn.image_diff_subset
theorem InjOn.imageFactorization_injective (h : InjOn f s) :
Injective (s.imageFactorization f) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h' ↦ by simpa [imageFactorization, h.eq_iff hx hy] using h'
@[simp] theorem imageFactorization_injective_iff : Injective (s.imageFactorization f) ↔ InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ ↦ by simpa using @h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ (by simpa [imageFactorization]),
InjOn.imageFactorization_injective⟩
end injOn
section graphOn
variable {x : α × β}
lemma graphOn_univ_inj {g : α → β} : univ.graphOn f = univ.graphOn g ↔ f = g := by simp
lemma graphOn_univ_injective : Injective (univ.graphOn : (α → β) → Set (α × β)) :=
fun _f _g ↦ graphOn_univ_inj.1
lemma exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f : α → β, s = graphOn f (Prod.fst '' s)) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
rw [hf]
exact InjOn.image_of_comp <| injOn_id _
· have : ∀ x ∈ Prod.fst '' s, ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s := forall_mem_image.2 fun (x, y) h ↦ ⟨y, h⟩
choose! f hf using this
rw [forall_mem_image] at hf
use f
rw [graphOn, image_image, EqOn.image_eq_self]
exact fun x hx ↦ h (hf hx) hx rfl
lemma exists_eq_graphOn [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f t, s = graphOn f t) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s :=
.trans ⟨fun ⟨f, t, hs⟩ ↦ ⟨f, by rw [hs, image_fst_graphOn]⟩, fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨f, _, hf⟩⟩
exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst
end graphOn
/-! ### Surjectivity on a set -/
section surjOn
theorem SurjOn.subset_range (h : SurjOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
Subset.trans h <| image_subset_range f s
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype :
SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ (t' : Set β) (g : s → t'), t ⊆ t' ∧ Surjective g ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨_, (mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s _, h, surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _, fun _ => rfl⟩,
fun ⟨t', g, htt', hg, hfg⟩ y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hg ⟨y, htt' hy⟩
⟨x, x.2, by rw [hfg, hx, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩⟩
theorem surjOn_empty (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s ∅ :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem surjOn_empty_iff : SurjOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ := by
simp [SurjOn, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma surjOn_singleton : SurjOn f s {b} ↔ b ∈ f '' s := singleton_subset_iff
theorem surjOn_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s (f '' s) :=
Subset.rfl
theorem SurjOn.comap_nonempty (h : SurjOn f s t) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(ht.mono h).of_image
theorem SurjOn.congr (h : SurjOn f₁ s t) (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₂ s t := by
rwa [SurjOn, ← H.image_eq]
theorem EqOn.surjOn_iff (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₁ s t ↔ SurjOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun H => H.congr h, fun H => H.congr h.symm⟩
theorem SurjOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (hf : SurjOn f s₁ t₂) : SurjOn f s₂ t₁ :=
Subset.trans ht <| Subset.trans hf <| image_subset _ hs
theorem SurjOn.union (h₁ : SurjOn f s t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s t₂) : SurjOn f s (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => h₁ hx) fun hx => h₂ hx
theorem SurjOn.union_union (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
(h₁.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl _)).union
(h₂.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl _))
theorem SurjOn.inter_inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
intro y hy
rcases h₁ hy.1 with ⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ hy.2 with ⟨x₂, hx₂, heq⟩
obtain rfl : x₁ = x₂ := h (Or.inl hx₁) (Or.inr hx₂) heq.symm
exact mem_image_of_mem f ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem SurjOn.inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) t :=
inter_self t ▸ h₁.inter_inter h₂ h
lemma surjOn_id (s : Set α) : SurjOn id s s := by simp [SurjOn]
theorem SurjOn.comp (hg : SurjOn g t p) (hf : SurjOn f s t) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
Subset.trans hg <| Subset.trans (image_subset g hf) <| image_comp g f s ▸ Subset.refl _
lemma SurjOn.of_comp (h : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p) (hr : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn g t p := by
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := h hz
exact ⟨f x, hr hx, rfl⟩
lemma surjOn_comp_iff : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ SurjOn g (f '' s) p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_comp <| mapsTo_image f s, fun h ↦ h.comp <| surjOn_image _ _⟩
lemma SurjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : SurjOn f s s) : ∀ n, SurjOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => surjOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma SurjOn.comp_left (hf : SurjOn f s t) (g : β → γ) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) := by
rw [SurjOn, image_comp g f]; exact image_subset _ hf
lemma SurjOn.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := by
rwa [SurjOn, image_comp g f, image_preimage_eq _ hf]
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : t.Nonempty → s.Nonempty) :
SurjOn f s t :=
fun _ ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| (h ⟨_, ha⟩).image _
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s s :=
surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem surjective_iff_surjOn_univ : Surjective f ↔ SurjOn f univ univ := by
simp [Surjective, SurjOn, subset_def]
theorem SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo (h₁ : SurjOn f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset h₂.image_subset h₁
theorem image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo : f '' s = t ↔ s.SurjOn f t ∧ s.MapsTo f t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.2⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.surjOn_image f, s.mapsTo_image f⟩
lemma SurjOn.image_preimage (h : Set.SurjOn f s t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : f '' (f ⁻¹' t₁) = t₁ :=
image_preimage_eq_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ mem_range_of_mem_image f s <| h <| ht hx
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_compl (h : SurjOn f s t) (h' : Injective f) : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ :=
fun _ hs ht =>
let ⟨_, hx', HEq⟩ := h ht
hs <| h' HEq ▸ hx'
theorem MapsTo.surjOn_compl (h : MapsTo f s t) (h' : Surjective f) : SurjOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
h'.forall.2 fun _ ht => (mem_image_of_mem _) fun hs => ht (h hs)
theorem EqOn.cancel_right (hf : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f)) (hf' : s.SurjOn f t) : t.EqOn g₁ g₂ := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf' hb
exact hf ha
theorem SurjOn.cancel_right (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ t.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_right hf, fun h => h.comp_right hf'⟩
theorem eqOn_comp_right_iff : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ (f '' s).EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
(s.surjOn_image f).cancel_right <| s.mapsTo_image f
theorem SurjOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
(∀ y ∈ t, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
⟨fun H x hx ↦ H (f x) (hf' hx), fun H _y hy ↦ let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := hf hy; hxy ▸ H x hx⟩
end surjOn
/-! ### Bijectivity -/
section bijOn
theorem BijOn.mapsTo (h : BijOn f s t) : MapsTo f s t :=
h.left
theorem BijOn.injOn (h : BijOn f s t) : InjOn f s :=
h.right.left
theorem BijOn.surjOn (h : BijOn f s t) : SurjOn f s t :=
h.right.right
theorem BijOn.mk (h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : InjOn f s) (h₃ : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem bijOn_empty (f : α → β) : BijOn f ∅ ∅ :=
⟨mapsTo_empty f ∅, injOn_empty f, surjOn_empty f ∅⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_left : BijOn f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.mapsTo, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_right : BijOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.surjOn, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] lemma bijOn_singleton : BijOn f {a} {b} ↔ f a = b := by simp [BijOn, eq_comm]
theorem BijOn.inter_mapsTo (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s₂) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun _ hy =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h₁.surjOn hy.1
⟨x, ⟨hx, h₃ ⟨hx, hxy.symm.subst hy.2⟩⟩, hxy⟩⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter_bijOn (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₂ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s₁) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
inter_comm s₂ s₁ ▸ inter_comm t₂ t₁ ▸ h₂.inter_mapsTo h₁ h₃
theorem BijOn.inter (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left,
h₁.surjOn.inter_inter h₂.surjOn h⟩
theorem BijOn.union (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.union_union h₂.mapsTo, h, h₁.surjOn.union_union h₂.surjOn⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_range (h : BijOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
h.surjOn.subset_range
theorem InjOn.bijOn_image (h : InjOn f s) : BijOn f s (f '' s) :=
BijOn.mk (mapsTo_image f s) h (Subset.refl _)
theorem BijOn.congr (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₂ s t :=
BijOn.mk (h₁.mapsTo.congr h) (h₁.injOn.congr h) (h₁.surjOn.congr h)
theorem EqOn.bijOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₁ s t ↔ BijOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem BijOn.image_eq (h : BijOn f s t) : f '' s = t :=
h.surjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.mapsTo
lemma BijOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∀ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp h _ ha := h _ <| hf.mapsTo ha
mpr h b hb := by obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact h _ ha
lemma BijOn.exists {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∃ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp := by rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact ⟨a, ha, h⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨a, ha, h⟩; exact ⟨f a, hf.mapsTo ha, h⟩
lemma _root_.Equiv.image_eq_iff_bijOn (e : α ≃ β) : e '' s = t ↔ BijOn e s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨(mapsTo_image e s).mono_right h.subset, e.injective.injOn, h ▸ surjOn_image e s⟩,
BijOn.image_eq⟩
lemma bijOn_id (s : Set α) : BijOn id s s := ⟨s.mapsTo_id, s.injOn_id, s.surjOn_id⟩
theorem BijOn.comp (hg : BijOn g t p) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
BijOn.mk (hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo) (hg.injOn.comp hf.injOn hf.mapsTo) (hg.surjOn.comp hf.surjOn)
/-- If `f : α → β` and `g : β → γ` and if `f` is injective on `s`, then `f ∘ g` is a bijection
on `s` iff `g` is a bijection on `f '' s`. -/
theorem bijOn_comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ BijOn g (f '' s) p := by
simp only [BijOn, InjOn.comp_iff, surjOn_comp_iff, mapsTo_image_iff, hf]
/--
If we have a commutative square
```
α --f--> β
| |
p₁ p₂
| |
\/ \/
γ --g--> δ
```
and `f` induces a bijection from `s : Set α` to `t : Set β`, then `g`
induces a bijection from the image of `s` to the image of `t`, as long as `g` is
is injective on the image of `s`.
-/
theorem bijOn_image_image {p₁ : α → γ} {p₂ : β → δ} {g : γ → δ} (comm : ∀ a, p₂ (f a) = g (p₁ a))
(hbij : BijOn f s t) (hinj: InjOn g (p₁ '' s)) : BijOn g (p₁ '' s) (p₂ '' t) := by
obtain ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩ := hbij
refine ⟨?_, hinj, ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f a, h1 ha, by rw [comm a]⟩
· rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h3 hb
rw [← image_comp, comm]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
lemma BijOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n, BijOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => s.bijOn_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty ↔ t.Nonempty) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ h.1, injOn_of_subsingleton _ _, surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ h.2⟩
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : BijOn f s s :=
bijOn_of_subsingleton' _ Iff.rfl
theorem BijOn.bijective (h : BijOn f s t) : Bijective (h.mapsTo.restrict f s t) :=
⟨fun x y h' => Subtype.ext <| h.injOn x.2 y.2 <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h', fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h.surjOn hy
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.eq hxy⟩⟩
theorem bijective_iff_bijOn_univ : Bijective f ↔ BijOn f univ univ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨mapsTo_univ f _, inj.injOn, Iff.mp surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩)
fun h =>
let ⟨_map, inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨Iff.mpr injective_iff_injOn_univ inj, Iff.mpr surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ, _⟩ := bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
theorem BijOn.compl (hst : BijOn f s t) (hf : Bijective f) : BijOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
⟨hst.surjOn.mapsTo_compl hf.1, hf.1.injOn, hst.mapsTo.surjOn_compl hf.2⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_right {r : Set β} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrt : r ⊆ t) :
BijOn f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' r) r := by
refine ⟨inter_subset_right, hf.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn (hrt hx)
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_left {r : Set α} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
BijOn f r (f '' r) :=
(hf.injOn.mono hrs).bijOn_image
theorem BijOn.insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) (hfa : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) ↔ BijOn f s t where
mp h := by
have := congrArg (· \ {f a}) (image_insert_eq ▸ h.image_eq)
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, insert_diff_of_mem] at this
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hfa, diff_singleton_eq_self] at this
· exact ⟨by simp [← this, mapsTo'], h.injOn.mono (subset_insert ..),
by simp [← this, surjOn_image]⟩
simp only [mem_image, not_exists, not_and]
intro x hx
rw [h.injOn.eq_iff (by simp [hx]) (by simp)]
exact ha ∘ (· ▸ hx)
mpr h := by
repeat rw [insert_eq]
refine (bijOn_singleton.mpr rfl).union h ?_
simp only [singleton_union, injOn_insert fun x ↦ (hfa (h.mapsTo x)), h.injOn, mem_image,
not_exists, not_and, true_and]
exact fun _ hx h₂ ↦ hfa (h₂ ▸ h.mapsTo hx)
theorem BijOn.insert (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) :=
(insert_iff (h₂ <| h₁.mapsTo ·) h₂).mpr h₁
theorem BijOn.sdiff_singleton (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : a ∈ s) :
BijOn f (s \ {a}) (t \ {f a}) := by
convert h₁.subset_left diff_subset
simp [h₁.injOn.image_diff, h₁.image_eq, h₂, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
end bijOn
/-! ### left inverse -/
namespace LeftInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : EqOn (f' ∘ f) id s :=
h
theorem eq (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : f' (f x) = x :=
h hx
theorem congr_left (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) {t : Set β} (h₁' : MapsTo f s t)
(heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) : LeftInvOn f₂' f s := fun _ hx => heq (h₁' hx) ▸ h₁ hx
theorem congr_right (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f₁ s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : LeftInvOn f₁' f₂ s :=
fun _ hx => heq hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem injOn (h : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) : InjOn f s := fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ heq =>
calc
x₁ = f₁' (f x₁) := Eq.symm <| h h₁
_ = f₁' (f x₂) := congr_arg f₁' heq
_ = x₂ := h h₂
theorem surjOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn f' t s := fun x hx =>
⟨f x, hf hx, h hx⟩
theorem mapsTo (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
MapsTo f' t s := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hs, hx⟩ := hf hy
rwa [← hx, h hs]
lemma _root_.Set.leftInvOn_id (s : Set α) : LeftInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf' : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hg' : LeftInvOn g' g t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
LeftInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s := fun x h =>
calc
(f' ∘ g') ((g ∘ f) x) = f' (f x) := congr_arg f' (hg' (hf h))
_ = x := hf' h
theorem mono (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s) : LeftInvOn f' f s₁ := fun _ hx =>
hf (ht hx)
theorem image_inter' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' s₁ ∩ f '' s := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨by rwa [mem_preimage, hf h], mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩
· rintro _ ⟨h₁, ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨by rwa [← hf h], h⟩
theorem image_inter (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) :
f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' (s₁ ∩ s) ∩ f '' s := by
rw [hf.image_inter']
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono inter_subset_left))
rintro _ ⟨h₁, x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, by rwa [hf hx]⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
theorem image_image (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f' '' (f '' s) = s := by
rw [Set.image_image, image_congr hf, image_id']
theorem image_image' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f' '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).image_image
end LeftInvOn
/-! ### Right inverse -/
section RightInvOn
namespace RightInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : RightInvOn f' f t) : EqOn (f ∘ f') id t :=
h
theorem eq (h : RightInvOn f' f t) {y} (hy : y ∈ t) : f (f' y) = y :=
h hy
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : RightInvOn f' f (f '' s) :=
fun _y ⟨_x, hx, heq⟩ => heq ▸ (congr_arg f <| h.eq hx)
theorem congr_left (h₁ : RightInvOn f₁' f t) (heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) :
RightInvOn f₂' f t :=
h₁.congr_right heq
theorem congr_right (h₁ : RightInvOn f' f₁ t) (hg : MapsTo f' t s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) :
RightInvOn f' f₂ t :=
LeftInvOn.congr_left h₁ hg heq
theorem surjOn (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : SurjOn f s t :=
LeftInvOn.surjOn hf hf'
theorem mapsTo (h : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf : SurjOn f' t s) : MapsTo f s t :=
LeftInvOn.mapsTo h hf
lemma _root_.Set.rightInvOn_id (s : Set α) : RightInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hg : RightInvOn g' g p) (g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
RightInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) p :=
LeftInvOn.comp hg hf g'pt
theorem mono (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : RightInvOn f' f t₁ :=
LeftInvOn.mono hf ht
end RightInvOn
theorem InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn (hf : InjOn f s) (hf' : LeftInvOn f f' t)
(h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f' t s) : RightInvOn f f' s := fun _ h =>
hf (h₂ <| h₁ h) h (hf' (h₁ h))
theorem eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) (h₂ : RightInvOn f₂' f t)
(h : MapsTo f₂' t s) : EqOn f₁' f₂' t := fun y hy =>
calc
f₁' y = (f₁' ∘ f ∘ f₂') y := congr_arg f₁' (h₂ hy).symm
_ = f₂' y := h₁ (h hy)
theorem SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hf' : RightInvOn f f' s) :
LeftInvOn f f' t := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hx, heq⟩ := hf hy
rw [← heq, hf' hx]
end RightInvOn
/-! ### Two-side inverses -/
namespace InvOn
lemma _root_.Set.invOn_id (s : Set α) : InvOn id id s s := ⟨s.leftInvOn_id, s.rightInvOn_id⟩
lemma comp (hf : InvOn f' f s t) (hg : InvOn g' g t p) (fst : MapsTo f s t)
(g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
InvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s p :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 fst, hf.2.comp hg.2 g'pt⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : InvOn f' f s t) : InvOn f f' t s :=
⟨h.right, h.left⟩
theorem mono (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : InvOn f' f s₁ t₁ :=
⟨h.1.mono hs, h.2.mono ht⟩
/-- If functions `f'` and `f` are inverse on `s` and `t`, `f` maps `s` into `t`, and `f'` maps `t`
into `s`, then `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`. The `mapsTo` arguments can be deduced from
`surjOn` statements using `LeftInvOn.mapsTo` and `RightInvOn.mapsTo`. -/
theorem bijOn (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨hf, h.left.injOn, h.right.surjOn hf'⟩
end InvOn
end Set
/-! ### `invFunOn` is a left/right inverse -/
namespace Function
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange`. -/
noncomputable def invFunOn [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (b : β) : α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then Classical.choose h else Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α›
variable [Nonempty α]
theorem invFunOn_pos (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s ∧ f (invFunOn f s b) = b := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
theorem invFunOn_mem (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s :=
(invFunOn_pos h).left
theorem invFunOn_eq (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : f (invFunOn f s b) = b :=
(invFunOn_pos h).right
theorem invFunOn_neg (h : ¬∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b = Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α› := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem invFunOn_apply_mem (h : a ∈ s) : invFunOn f s (f a) ∈ s :=
invFunOn_mem ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
theorem invFunOn_apply_eq (h : a ∈ s) : f (invFunOn f s (f a)) = f a :=
invFunOn_eq ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
end Function
open Function
namespace Set
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun _a ha => h (invFunOn_apply_mem ha) ha (invFunOn_apply_eq ha)
theorem InjOn.invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s₂) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
invFunOn f s₂ '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
h.leftInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' ht
theorem _root_.Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image [Nonempty α]
(h : s ⊆ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s)) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h hx
rw [invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self [Nonempty α] :
InjOn f s ↔ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) = s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.invFunOn_image Subset.rfl, fun h ↦
(Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image h.symm.subset).injOn⟩
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_injOn_image [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Set.InjOn (invFunOn f s) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ he
rw [← invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx, he, invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_image_image_subset [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
(invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) ⊆ s := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨x,hx,rfl⟩, rfl⟩; exact invFunOn_apply_mem hx
theorem SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
RightInvOn (invFunOn f s) f t := fun _y hy => invFunOn_eq <| h hy
theorem BijOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : BijOn f s t) : InvOn (invFunOn f s) f s t :=
⟨h.injOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn, h.surjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
theorem SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
InvOn (invFunOn f s) f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine ⟨?_, h.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : MapsTo (invFunOn f s) t s :=
fun _y hy => mem_preimage.2 <| invFunOn_mem <| h hy
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image'`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image_of_subset [Nonempty α] {r : Set β} (hf : SurjOn f s t)
(hrt : r ⊆ t) : f '' (f.invFunOn s '' r) = r :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' hrt
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
f '' (f.invFunOn s '' t) = t :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image
theorem SurjOn.bijOn_subset [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine h.invOn_invFunOn.bijOn ?_ (mapsTo_image _ _)
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rwa [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset : SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' t := by
constructor
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with (rfl | ht)
· exact fun _ => ⟨∅, empty_subset _, bijOn_empty f⟩
· intro h
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨Classical.choose (h.comap_nonempty ht)⟩
exact ⟨_, h.mapsTo_invFunOn.image_subset, h.bijOn_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨s', hs', hfs'⟩
exact hfs'.surjOn.mono hs' (Subset.refl _)
alias ⟨SurjOn.exists_bijOn_subset, _⟩ := Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
variable (f s)
lemma exists_subset_bijOn : ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' (f '' s) :=
surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset.mp (surjOn_image f s)
lemma exists_image_eq_and_injOn : ∃ u, f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u :=
let ⟨u, _, hfu⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn s f
⟨u, hfu.image_eq, hfu.injOn⟩
variable {f s}
lemma exists_image_eq_injOn_of_subset_range (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
∃ s, f '' s = t ∧ InjOn f s :=
image_preimage_eq_of_subset ht ▸ exists_image_eq_and_injOn _ _
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t` and a set `t'` is contained in the image of some `s₁ ⊇ s`,
then `s₁` has a subset containing `s` that `f` maps bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend_of_subset {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (hss₁ : s ⊆ s₁) (htt' : t ⊆ t')
(ht' : SurjOn f s₁ t') : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ s₁ ∧ Set.BijOn f s' t' := by
obtain ⟨r, hrss, hbij⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn ((s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t') \ f ⁻¹' t) f
rw [image_diff_preimage, image_inter_preimage] at hbij
refine ⟨s ∪ r, subset_union_left, ?_, ?_, ?_, fun y hyt' ↦ ?_⟩
· exact union_subset hss₁ <| hrss.trans <| diff_subset.trans inter_subset_left
· rw [mapsTo', image_union, hbij.image_eq, h.image_eq, union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨htt', diff_subset.trans inter_subset_right⟩
· rw [injOn_union, and_iff_right h.injOn, and_iff_right hbij.injOn]
· refine fun x hxs y hyr hxy ↦ (hrss hyr).2 ?_
rw [← h.image_eq]
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
exact (subset_diff.1 hrss).2.symm.mono_left h.mapsTo
rw [image_union, h.image_eq, hbij.image_eq, union_diff_self]
exact .inr ⟨ht' hyt', hyt'⟩
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t`, and `t'` is a superset of `t` contained in the range of `f`,
then `f` maps some superset of `s` bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (htt' : t ⊆ t') (ht' : t' ⊆ range f) :
∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ BijOn f s' t' := by
simpa using h.exists_extend_of_subset (subset_univ s) htt' (by simpa [SurjOn])
theorem InjOn.exists_subset_injOn_subset_range_eq {r : Set α} (hinj : InjOn f r) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
∃ u : Set α, r ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hru, hus, h⟩ := hinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hrs
(image_subset f hrs) Subset.rfl
exact ⟨u, hru, hus, h.image_eq, h.injOn⟩
theorem preimage_invFun_of_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∈ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [mem_preimage, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, mem_range_self, not_true, or_false,
leftInverse_invFun hf _, hf.mem_set_image]
· simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, hx, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, not_false_iff, or_true]
theorem preimage_invFun_of_not_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∉ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· rw [mem_preimage, leftInverse_invFun hf, hf.mem_set_image]
· have : x ∉ f '' s := fun h' => hx (image_subset_range _ _ h')
simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, this]
lemma BijOn.symm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn g t s :=
⟨h.2.mapsTo hf.surjOn, h.1.injOn, h.2.surjOn hf.mapsTo⟩
lemma bijOn_comm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) : BijOn f s t ↔ BijOn g t s :=
⟨BijOn.symm h, BijOn.symm h.symm⟩
end Set
namespace Function
open Set
variable {fa : α → α} {fb : β → β} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {s t : Set α}
theorem Injective.comp_injOn (hg : Injective g) (hf : s.InjOn f) : s.InjOn (g ∘ f) :=
hg.injOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem Surjective.surjOn (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : SurjOn f univ s :=
(surjective_iff_surjOn_univ.1 hf).mono (Subset.refl _) (subset_univ _)
theorem LeftInverse.leftInvOn {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) (s : Set β) : LeftInvOn f g s :=
fun x _ => h x
theorem RightInverse.rightInvOn {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) (s : Set α) :
RightInvOn f g s := fun x _ => h x
theorem LeftInverse.rightInvOn_range {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
RightInvOn f g (range g) :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun i => congr_arg g (h i)
namespace Semiconj
theorem mapsTo_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : MapsTo fa s t) : MapsTo fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
fun _y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨fa x, ha hx, h x⟩
theorem mapsTo_image_right {t : Set β} (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
MapsTo f (fa '' s) (fb '' t) :=
mapsTo_image_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hst hx, (h x).symm⟩
theorem mapsTo_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) : MapsTo fb (range f) (range f) := fun _y ⟨x, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨fa x, h x⟩
theorem surjOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : SurjOn fa s t) : SurjOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rintro y ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rcases ha hxt with ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩
rw [h x]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxs)
theorem surjOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Surjective fa) :
SurjOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.surjOn_image (ha.surjOn univ)
theorem injOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : InjOn fa s) (hf : InjOn f (fa '' s)) :
InjOn fb (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ H
simp only [← h.eq] at H
exact congr_arg f (ha hx hy <| hf (mem_image_of_mem fa hx) (mem_image_of_mem fa hy) H)
theorem injOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Injective fa) (hf : InjOn f (range fa)) :
InjOn fb (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ] at *
exact h.injOn_image ha.injOn hf
theorem bijOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : BijOn fa s t) (hf : InjOn f t) :
BijOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo_image ha.mapsTo, h.injOn_image ha.injOn (ha.image_eq.symm ▸ hf),
h.surjOn_image ha.surjOn⟩
theorem bijOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Bijective fa) (hf : Injective f) :
BijOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.bijOn_image (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.1 ha) hf.injOn
theorem mapsTo_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s t : Set β} (hb : MapsTo fb s t) :
MapsTo fa (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := fun x hx => by simp only [mem_preimage, h x, hb hx]
theorem injOn_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s : Set β} (hb : InjOn fb s)
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : InjOn fa (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy H
have := congr_arg f H
rw [h.eq, h.eq] at this
exact hf hx hy (hb hx hy this)
end Semiconj
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : β → Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : ∀ b, γ b) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ i) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) :
(fun j => update g i a (f j)) = fun j => g (f j) :=
(update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' _ _) fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : β → γ) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' g a h
theorem insert_injOn (s : Set α) : sᶜ.InjOn fun a => insert a s := fun _a ha _ _ =>
(insert_inj ha).1
lemma apply_eq_of_range_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {b : β} (h : range f = {b}) (a : α) :
f a = b := by
simpa only [h, mem_singleton_iff] using mem_range_self (f := f) a
end Function
/-! ### Equivalences, permutations -/
namespace Set
variable {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} {g g₁ g₂ : Perm α} {s t : Set α}
protected lemma MapsTo.extendDomain (h : MapsTo g s t) :
MapsTo (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, h ha, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma SurjOn.extendDomain (h : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := h ha
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hb, rfl⟩, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma BijOn.extendDomain (h : BijOn g s t) :
BijOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo.extendDomain, (g.extendDomain f).injective.injOn, h.surjOn.extendDomain⟩
protected lemma LeftInvOn.extendDomain (h : LeftInvOn g₁ g₂ s) :
LeftInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma RightInvOn.extendDomain (h : RightInvOn g₁ g₂ t) :
RightInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma InvOn.extendDomain (h : InvOn g₁ g₂ s t) :
InvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.1.extendDomain, h.2.extendDomain⟩
end Set
namespace Set
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} {s₁ : Set α₁} {s₂ : Set α₂} {t₁ : Set β₁} {t₂ : Set β₂}
{f₁ : α₁ → β₁} {f₂ : α₂ → β₂} {g₁ : β₁ → α₁} {g₂ : β₂ → α₂}
lemma InjOn.prodMap (h₁ : s₁.InjOn f₁) (h₂ : s₂.InjOn f₂) :
(s₁ ×ˢ s₂).InjOn fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2) :=
fun x hx y hy ↦ by simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]; exact And.imp (h₁ hx.1 hy.1) (h₂ hx.2 hy.2)
lemma SurjOn.prodMap (h₁ : SurjOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨a₁, ha₁, hx₁⟩ := h₁ hx.1
obtain ⟨a₂, ha₂, hx₂⟩ := h₂ hx.2
exact ⟨(a₁, a₂), ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, Prod.ext hx₁ hx₂⟩
lemma MapsTo.prodMap (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f₂ s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
lemma BijOn.prodMap (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
BijOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.prodMap h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.prodMap h₂.injOn, h₁.surjOn.prodMap h₂.surjOn⟩
lemma LeftInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : LeftInvOn g₁ f₁ s₁) (h₂ : LeftInvOn g₂ f₂ s₂) :
LeftInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma RightInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : RightInvOn g₁ f₁ t₁) (h₂ : RightInvOn g₂ f₂ t₂) :
RightInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma InvOn.prodMap (h₁ : InvOn g₁ f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : InvOn g₂ f₂ s₂ t₂) :
InvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.1.prodMap h₂.1, h₁.2.prodMap h₂.2⟩
end Set
namespace Equiv
open Set
variable (e : α ≃ β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
lemma bijOn' (h₁ : MapsTo e s t) (h₂ : MapsTo e.symm t s) : BijOn e s t :=
⟨h₁, e.injective.injOn, fun b hb ↦ ⟨e.symm b, h₂ hb, apply_symm_apply _ _⟩⟩
protected lemma bijOn (h : ∀ a, e a ∈ t ↔ a ∈ s) : BijOn e s t :=
e.bijOn' (fun _ ↦ (h _).2) fun b hb ↦ (h _).1 <| by rwa [apply_symm_apply]
lemma invOn : InvOn e e.symm t s :=
⟨e.rightInverse_symm.leftInvOn _, e.leftInverse_symm.leftInvOn _⟩
lemma bijOn_image : BijOn e s (e '' s) := e.injective.injOn.bijOn_image
lemma bijOn_symm_image : BijOn e.symm (e '' s) s := e.bijOn_image.symm e.invOn
variable {e}
@[simp] lemma bijOn_symm : BijOn e.symm t s ↔ BijOn e s t := bijOn_comm e.symm.invOn
alias ⟨_root_.Set.BijOn.of_equiv_symm, _root_.Set.BijOn.equiv_symm⟩ := bijOn_symm
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b : α}
lemma bijOn_swap (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : BijOn (swap a b) s s :=
(swap a b).bijOn fun x ↦ by
obtain rfl | hxa := eq_or_ne x a <;>
obtain rfl | hxb := eq_or_ne x b <;>
simp [*, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 1,786 | 1,787 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
|
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,312 | 1,313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
| theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 211 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.ApproximatesLinearOn
/-!
# Inverse function theorem
In this file we prove the inverse function theorem. It says that if a map `f : E → F`
has an invertible strict derivative `f'` at `a`, then it is locally invertible,
and the inverse function has derivative `f' ⁻¹`.
We define `HasStrictFDerivAt.toPartialHomeomorph` that repacks a function `f`
with a `hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' a`, `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F`, into a `PartialHomeomorph`.
The `toFun` of this `PartialHomeomorph` is defeq to `f`, so one can apply theorems
about `PartialHomeomorph` to `hf.toPartialHomeomorph f`, and get statements about `f`.
Then we define `HasStrictFDerivAt.localInverse` to be the `invFun` of this `PartialHomeomorph`,
and prove two versions of the inverse function theorem:
* `HasStrictFDerivAt.to_localInverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in the
strict sense (`hf`), then `hf.localInverse f f' a` has derivative `f'.symm` at `f a` in the
strict sense;
* `HasStrictFDerivAt.to_local_left_inverse`: if `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `a` in
the strict sense and `g` is locally left inverse to `f` near `a`, then `g` has derivative
`f'.symm` at `f a` in the strict sense.
Some related theorems, providing the derivative and higher regularity assuming that we already know
the inverse function, are formulated in the `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv` and `Analysis/Calculus/Deriv`
folders, and in `ContDiff.lean`.
## Tags
derivative, strictly differentiable, continuously differentiable, smooth, inverse function
-/
open Function Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open Asymptotics Filter Metric Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (id)
/-!
### Inverse function theorem
Let `f : E → F` be a map defined on a complete vector
space `E`. Assume that `f` has an invertible derivative `f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F` at `a : E` in the strict
sense. Then `f` approximates `f'` in the sense of `ApproximatesLinearOn` on an open neighborhood
of `a`, and we can apply `ApproximatesLinearOn.toPartialHomeomorph` to construct the inverse
function. -/
namespace HasStrictFDerivAt
/-- If `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the strict sense and `c > 0`, then `f` approximates `f'`
with constant `c` on some neighborhood of `a`. -/
theorem approximates_deriv_on_nhds {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
(hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' a) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : Subsingleton E ∨ 0 < c) :
∃ s ∈ 𝓝 a, ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c := by
rcases hc with hE | hc
· refine ⟨univ, IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ trivial, fun x _ y _ => ?_⟩
simp [@Subsingleton.elim E hE x y]
have := hf.isLittleO.def hc
rw [nhds_prod_eq, Filter.Eventually, mem_prod_same_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨s, has, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, has, fun x hx y hy => hs (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
theorem map_nhds_eq_of_surj [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F] {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
(hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) (h : LinearMap.range f' = ⊤) :
map f (𝓝 a) = 𝓝 (f a) := by
let f'symm := f'.nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective h
set c : ℝ≥0 := f'symm.nnnorm⁻¹ / 2 with hc
have f'symm_pos : 0 < f'symm.nnnorm := f'.nonlinearRightInverseOfSurjective_nnnorm_pos h
| have cpos : 0 < c := by simp [hc, half_pos, inv_pos, f'symm_pos]
obtain ⟨s, s_nhds, hs⟩ : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 a, ApproximatesLinearOn f f' s c :=
hf.approximates_deriv_on_nhds (Or.inr cpos)
apply hs.map_nhds_eq f'symm s_nhds (Or.inr (NNReal.half_lt_self _))
simp [ne_of_gt f'symm_pos]
variable {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : E}
theorem approximates_deriv_on_open_nhds (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) a) :
∃ s : Set E, a ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s ∧
ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s (‖(f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖₊⁻¹ / 2) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean | 86 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
/-!
# Order topology on a densely ordered set
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
section DenselyOrdered
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
{s : Set α}
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`, unless `a` is a top
element. -/
theorem closure_Ioi' {a : α} (h : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self isClosed_Ici
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Ici_diff_Ioi_same, singleton_subset_iff]
exact isGLB_Ioi.mem_closure h
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioi (a : α) [NoMaxOrder α] : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
closure_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the closed interval `(-∞, a]`, unless `a` is a bottom
element. -/
theorem closure_Iio' (h : (Iio a).Nonempty) : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Ioi' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the interval `(-∞, a]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iio (a : α) [NoMinOrder α] : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Iio' nonempty_Iio
/-- The closure of the open interval `(a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· rcases hab.lt_or_lt with hab | hab
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Icc_diff_Ioo_same hab.le]
have hab' : (Ioo a b).Nonempty := nonempty_Ioo.2 hab
simp only [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨(isGLB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab', (isLUB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab'⟩
· rw [Icc_eq_empty_of_lt hab]
exact empty_subset _
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, b]` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
/-- The closure of the interval `[a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a := by
rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio' ha, compl_Iic]
theorem interior_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
interior_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem interior_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Ici' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem interior_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem interior_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} :
Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Icc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ico, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ioc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
theorem closure_interior_Icc {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : closure (interior (Icc a b)) = Icc a b :=
(closure_minimal interior_subset isClosed_Icc).antisymm <|
calc
Icc a b = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Icc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ioc_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | h)
· simp
· calc
Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := Ioc_subset_Icc_self
_ = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Ioc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ico_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ico a b)) := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using
Ioc_subset_closure_interior (OrderDual.toDual b) (OrderDual.toDual a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ici a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ici a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iic a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iic a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioi' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Ioi' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iio' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iio a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Iio' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Iio [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iio a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iio' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
frontier (Icc a b) = {a, b} := by simp [frontier, h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioo {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioo a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioo h.ne, interior_Ioo, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ico a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ico h.ne, interior_Ico, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioc a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioc h.ne, interior_Ioc, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' {a b : α} (H₁ : (Ioi a).Nonempty) (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Ioi' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' nonempty_Ioi H
theorem nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt {a : α} (H : ∃ b, a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' H (le_refl a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' := nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt
instance nhdsGT_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot le_rfl
@[deprecated nhdsGT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsGT_neBot a
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' {b c : α} (H₁ : (Iio c).Nonempty) (H₂ : b ≤ c) :
NeBot (𝓝[Iio c] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Iio' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Iio b] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' nonempty_Iio H
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' {b : α} (H : (Iio b).Nonempty) : NeBot (𝓝[<] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' H (le_refl b)
instance nhdsLT_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot (le_refl a)
@[deprecated nhdsLT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsLT_neBot a
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ico a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ico H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ico.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioc a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioc H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioc.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop := by
nontriviality
haveI : Nonempty s := nontrivial_iff_nonempty.1 ‹_›
rcases hs (nonempty_subtype.1 ‹_›) with ⟨a, h, hs⟩
ext u; constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxa : a ≤ x, hxb : x < b⟩, hxt : Ioo x b ⊆ t⟩ :=
(mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset h).mp ht
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyb⟩ := exists_between hxb
refine mem_of_superset (mem_atTop ⟨y, hs ⟨hxa.trans_lt hxy, hyb⟩⟩) ?_
rintro ⟨z, hzs⟩ (hyz : y ≤ z)
exact hts (hxt ⟨hxy.trans_le hyz, hb hzs⟩)
· intro hu
obtain ⟨x : s, hx : ∀ z, x ≤ z → z ∈ u⟩ := mem_atTop_sets.1 hu
exact ⟨Ioo x b, Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (hb x.2), fun z hz => hx _ hz.1.le⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Iio_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot := by
apply comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
simp only [OrderDual.exists, Ioo_toDual]
exact hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Ioi_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : ∀ a' < b, ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] b := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (Iio b) with (hb' | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· have : IsEmpty s := ⟨fun x => hb'.subset (hb x.2)⟩
rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty atTop, Filter.map_bot, hb', nhdsWithin_empty]
· rw [← comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset hb fun _ => hs a ha, map_comap_of_mem]
rw [Subtype.range_val]
exact (mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' ha).2 (hs a ha)
theorem map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : ∀ b' > a, ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a := by
-- the elaborator gets stuck without `(... :)`
refine (map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
fun b' hb' => ?_ :)
simpa using hs b' hb'
/-- The `atTop` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the left-neighbourhoods filter at
the right endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop :=
comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self fun h => ⟨a, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the right-neighbourhoods filter at
the left endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Ioi_self fun h => ⟨b, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioi a → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (Subset.refl _) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x, hx, Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Iio a → α) (𝓝[<] a) = atTop :=
| comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (α := αᵒᵈ) a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Iio_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/DenselyOrdered.lean | 291 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.NormalMono.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
/-!
# Every NonPreadditiveAbelian category is preadditive
In mathlib, we define an abelian category as a preadditive category with a zero object,
kernels and cokernels, products and coproducts and in which every monomorphism and epimorphism is
normal.
While virtually every interesting abelian category has a natural preadditive structure (which is why
it is included in the definition), preadditivity is not actually needed: Every category that has
all of the other properties appearing in the definition of an abelian category admits a preadditive
structure. This is the construction we carry out in this file.
The proof proceeds in roughly five steps:
1. Prove some results (for example that all equalizers exist) that would be trivial if we already
had the preadditive structure but are a bit of work without it.
2. Develop images and coimages to show that every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel.
The results of the first two steps are also useful for the "normal" development of abelian
categories, and will be used there.
3. For every object `A`, define a "subtraction" morphism `σ : A ⨯ A ⟶ A` and use it to define
subtraction on morphisms as `f - g := prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
4. Prove a small number of identities about this subtraction from the definition of `σ`.
5. From these identities, prove a large number of other identities that imply that defining
`f + g := f - (0 - g)` indeed gives an abelian group structure on morphisms such that composition
is bilinear.
The construction is non-trivial and it is quite remarkable that this abelian group structure can
be constructed purely from the existence of a few limits and colimits. Even more remarkably,
since abelian categories admit exactly one preadditive structure (see
`subsingletonPreadditiveOfHasBinaryBiproducts`), the construction manages to exactly
reconstruct any natural preadditive structure the category may have.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
section
universe v u
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- We call a category `NonPreadditiveAbelian` if it has a zero object, kernels, cokernels, binary
products and coproducts, and every monomorphism and every epimorphism is normal. -/
class NonPreadditiveAbelian extends HasZeroMorphisms C, IsNormalMonoCategory C,
IsNormalEpiCategory C where
[has_zero_object : HasZeroObject C]
[has_kernels : HasKernels C]
[has_cokernels : HasCokernels C]
[has_finite_products : HasFiniteProducts C]
[has_finite_coproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_zero_object
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_kernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_cokernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_products
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_coproducts
end
end CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [NonPreadditiveAbelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory.NonPreadditiveAbelian
section Factor
variable {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q)
/-- The map `p : P ⟶ image f` is an epimorphism -/
instance : Epi (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
let I := Abelian.image f
let p := Abelian.factorThruImage f
let i := kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
-- It will suffice to consider some g : I ⟶ R such that p ≫ g = 0 and show that g = 0.
NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
_ fun R (g : I ⟶ R) (hpg : p ≫ g = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := ker g ≫ i is the kernel of some morphism h.
let u := kernel.ι g ≫ i
haveI hu := normalMonoOfMono u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, p factors through the kernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := kernel.lift' g p hpg
have fh : f ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
f ≫ h = (p ≫ i) ≫ h := (Abelian.image.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = ((t ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i) ≫ h := ht ▸ rfl
_ = t ≫ u ≫ h := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = t ≫ 0 := hu.w ▸ rfl
_ = 0 := HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero _ _
-- h factors through the cokernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := cokernel.desc' f h fh
have hih : i ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
i ≫ h = i ≫ cokernel.π f ≫ l := hl ▸ rfl
_ = 0 ≫ l := by rw [← Category.assoc, kernel.condition]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- i factors through u = ker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalMono.lift' u i hih
have hs' : (s ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i = 𝟙 I ≫ i := by rw [Category.assoc, hs, Category.id_comp]
haveI : Epi (kernel.ι g) := epi_of_epi_fac ((cancel_mono _).1 hs')
-- ker g is an epimorphism, but ker g ≫ g = 0 = ker g ≫ 0, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_epi_comp _ (kernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruImage [Mono f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi <| Abelian.factorThruImage f
/-- The canonical morphism `i : coimage f ⟶ Q` is a monomorphism -/
instance : Mono (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
let I := Abelian.coimage f
let i := Abelian.factorThruCoimage f
let p := cokernel.π (kernel.ι f)
NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero _ fun R (g : R ⟶ I) (hgi : g ≫ i = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := p ≫ coker g is the cokernel of some morphism h.
let u := p ≫ cokernel.π g
haveI hu := normalEpiOfEpi u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, i factors through the cokernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := cokernel.desc' g i hgi
have hf : h ≫ f = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ f = h ≫ p ≫ i := (Abelian.coimage.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ t := ht ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ u ≫ t := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = 0 ≫ t := by rw [← Category.assoc, hu.w]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- h factors through the kernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := kernel.lift' f h hf
have hhp : h ≫ p = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ p = (l ≫ kernel.ι f) ≫ p := hl ▸ rfl
_ = l ≫ 0 := by rw [Category.assoc, cokernel.condition]
_ = 0 := comp_zero
-- p factors through u = coker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalEpi.desc' u p hhp
have hs' : p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ s = p ≫ 𝟙 I := by rw [← Category.assoc, hs, Category.comp_id]
haveI : Mono (cokernel.π g) := mono_of_mono_fac ((cancel_epi _).1 hs')
-- coker g is a monomorphism, but g ≫ coker g = 0 = 0 ≫ coker g, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_comp_mono _ (cokernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruCoimage [Epi f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
end Factor
section CokernelOfKernel
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, an epi is the cokernel of its kernel. More precisely:
If `f` is an epimorphism and `s` is some limit kernel cone on `f`, then `f` is a cokernel
of `Fork.ι s`. -/
def epiIsCokernelOfKernel [Epi f] (s : Fork f 0) (h : IsLimit s) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ f (KernelFork.condition s)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _
(cokernel.ofIsoComp _ _ (Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h)
(ConeMorphism.w (Limits.IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) (Abelian.coimage.fac f)
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, a mono is the kernel of its cokernel. More precisely:
If `f` is a monomorphism and `s` is some colimit cokernel cocone on `f`, then `f` is a kernel
of `Cofork.π s`. -/
def monoIsKernelOfCokernel [Mono f] (s : Cofork f 0) (h : IsColimit s) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι f (CokernelCofork.condition s)) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _
(kernel.ofCompIso _ _ (Limits.IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso h (colimit.isColimit _))
(CoconeMorphism.w (Limits.IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso h <| colimit.isColimit _).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruImage f) (Abelian.image.fac f)
end CokernelOfKernel
section
/-- The composite `A ⟶ A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (Δ A)`, where the first map is `(𝟙 A, 0)` and the second map
is the canonical projection into the cokernel. -/
abbrev r (A : C) : A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) :=
prod.lift (𝟙 A) 0 ≫ cokernel.π (diag A)
instance mono_Δ {A : C} : Mono (diag A) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
instance mono_r {A : C} : Mono (r A) := by
let hl : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (diag A) (cokernel.condition (diag A))) :=
monoIsKernelOfCokernel _ (colimit.isColimit _)
apply NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro Z x hx
have hxx : (x ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) = 0 := by
rw [Category.assoc, hx]
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hl _ hxx
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι] at hy
have hyy : y = 0 := by
erw [← Category.comp_id y, ← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), ← Category.assoc, hy,
Category.assoc, prod.lift_snd, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
rw [← hy, hyy, zero_comp, zero_comp]
instance epi_r {A : C} : Epi (r A) := by
have hlp : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ Limits.prod.snd = 0 := prod.lift_snd _ _
let hp1 : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) hlp) := by
refine Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => Fork.ι s ≫ Limits.prod.fst) ?_ ?_
· intro s
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
· intro s m h
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
convert h
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
let hp2 : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.prod.snd : A ⨯ A ⟶ A) hlp) :=
epiIsCokernelOfKernel _ hp1
apply NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
intro Z z hz
have h : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ z = 0 := by rw [← Category.assoc, hz]
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hp2 _ h
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ] at ht
have htt : t = 0 := by
rw [← Category.id_comp t]
change 𝟙 A ≫ t = 0
rw [← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), Category.assoc, ht, ← Category.assoc,
cokernel.condition, zero_comp]
apply (cancel_epi (cokernel.π (diag A))).1
rw [← ht, htt, comp_zero, comp_zero]
instance isIso_r {A : C} : IsIso (r A) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
/-- The composite `A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) ⟶ A` given by the natural projection into the cokernel
followed by the inverse of `r`. In the category of modules, using the normal kernels and
cokernels, this map is equal to the map `(a, b) ↦ a - b`, hence the name `σ` for
"subtraction". -/
abbrev σ {A : C} : A ⨯ A ⟶ A :=
cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ inv (r A)
end
@[reassoc]
theorem diag_σ {X : C} : diag X ≫ σ = 0 := by rw [cokernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_σ {X : C} : prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ = 𝟙 X := by rw [← Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 := by simp
/-- σ is a cokernel of Δ X. -/
def isColimitσ {X : C} : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (σ : X ⨯ X ⟶ X) diag_σ) :=
cokernel.cokernelIso _ σ (asIso (r X)).symm (by rw [Iso.symm_hom, asIso_inv])
/-- This is the key identity satisfied by `σ`. -/
theorem σ_comp {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : σ ≫ f = Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' isColimitσ (Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ) (by
rw [prod.diag_map_assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero])
suffices hfg : f = g by rw [← hg, Cofork.π_ofπ, hfg]
calc
f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 ≫ σ := by rw [lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by rw [lift_map_assoc]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ ≫ g := by rw [← hg, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ]
_ = g := by rw [← Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.id_comp]
section
-- We write `f - g` for `prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
/-- Subtraction of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasSub {X Y : C} : Sub (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => prod.lift f g ≫ σ⟩
attribute [local instance] hasSub
-- We write `-f` for `0 - f`.
/-- Negation of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasNeg {X Y : C} : Neg (X ⟶ Y) where
neg := fun f => 0 - f
attribute [local instance] hasNeg
-- We write `f + g` for `f - (-g)`.
/-- Addition of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasAdd {X Y : C} : Add (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => f - -g⟩
attribute [local instance] hasAdd
theorem sub_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a - b = prod.lift a b ≫ σ := rfl
theorem add_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = a - -b := rfl
theorem neg_def {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a = 0 - a := rfl
theorem sub_zero {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - 0 = a := by
rw [sub_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; rw [← Category.comp_id a]
case a.g => rw [show 0 = a ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Y) by simp]
rw [← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
theorem sub_self {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - a = 0 := by
rw [sub_def, ← Category.comp_id a, ← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero]
theorem lift_sub_lift {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift a b - prod.lift c d = prod.lift (a - c) (b - d) := by
simp only [sub_def]
ext
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst]
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd]
theorem sub_sub_sub {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) : a - c - (b - d) = a - b - (c - d) := by
rw [sub_def, ← lift_sub_lift, sub_def, Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc]; rfl
theorem neg_sub {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -a - b = -b - a := by
conv_lhs => rw [neg_def, ← sub_zero b, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, ← neg_def]
theorem neg_neg {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : - -a = a := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [← sub_self a]
rw [sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem add_comm {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = b + a := by
rw [add_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← neg_neg a]
rw [neg_def, neg_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub]
conv_lhs =>
congr
next => skip
rw [← neg_def, neg_sub]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, ← neg_def, neg_neg b, neg_def]
theorem add_neg {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + -b = a - b := by rw [add_def, neg_neg]
theorem add_neg_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a + -a = 0 := by rw [add_neg, sub_self]
theorem neg_add_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a + a = 0 := by rw [add_comm, add_neg_cancel]
theorem neg_sub' {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -(a - b) = -a + b := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
| conv_lhs => rw [← sub_self (0 : X ⟶ Y)]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, neg_def]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/NonPreadditive.lean | 370 | 371 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.MeanInequalities
/-!
# Triangle inequality for `Lp`-seminorm
In this file we prove several versions of the triangle inequality for the `Lp` seminorm,
as well as simple corollaries.
-/
open Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → E}
theorem eLpNorm'_add_le (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hq1 : 1 ≤ q) : eLpNorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ := ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le hf.enorm hg.enorm hq1
theorem eLpNorm'_add_le_of_le_one (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q) (hq1 : q ≤ 1) :
eLpNorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ) :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ) :=
ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le_of_le_one hf.enorm hq0 hq1
theorem eLpNormEssSup_add_le {f g : α → E} :
eLpNormEssSup (f + g) μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup f μ + eLpNormEssSup g μ := by
refine le_trans (essSup_mono_ae (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)) (ENNReal.essSup_add_le _ _)
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, enorm_eq_nnnorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact nnnorm_add_le _ _
theorem eLpNorm_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hp1 : 1 ≤ p) : eLpNorm (f + g) p μ ≤ eLpNorm f p μ + eLpNorm g p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
| · simp [hp_top, eLpNormEssSup_add_le]
have hp1_real : 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.one_ne_top hp_top]
repeat rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp0 hp_top]
exact eLpNorm'_add_le hf hg hp1_real
/-- A constant for the inequality `‖f + g‖_{L^p} ≤ C * (‖f‖_{L^p} + ‖g‖_{L^p})`. It is equal to `1`
for `p ≥ 1` or `p = 0`, and `2^(1/p-1)` in the more tricky interval `(0, 1)`. -/
noncomputable def LpAddConst (p : ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) 1 then (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal - 1) else 1
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/TriangleInequality.lean | 54 | 63 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact bind_comp _ (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _)
theorem ofArrows_surj {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X)
(hg : ofArrows Y f g) : ∃ (i : ι) (h : Y i = Z),
g = eqToHom h.symm ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, rfl, by simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `F(X)`, we can define a presieve on `X` by taking the preimage via `F`. -/
def functorPullback (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) : Presieve X := fun _ f => R (F.map f)
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_mem (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
R.functorPullback F f ↔ R (F.map f) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_id (R : Presieve X) : R.functorPullback (𝟭 _) = R :=
rfl
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `X`, the predicate `R.hasPullbacks` means that for all arrows `f` and
`g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
class hasPullbacks (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- For all arrows `f` and `g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
has_pullbacks : ∀ {Y Z} {f : Y ⟶ X} (_ : R f) {g : Z ⟶ X} (_ : R g), HasPullback f g
instance (R : Presieve X) [HasPullbacks C] : R.hasPullbacks := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
instance {α : Type v₂} {X : α → C} {B : C} (π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks] (a b : α) : HasPullback (π a) (π b) :=
Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _) (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _)
section FunctorPushforward
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, we can define a presieve on `F(X)` (which is actually a sieve)
by taking the sieve generated by the image via `F`.
-/
def functorPushforward (S : Presieve X) : Presieve (F.obj X) := fun Y f =>
∃ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ F.obj Z), S g ∧ f = h ≫ F.map g
/-- An auxiliary definition in order to fix the choice of the preimages between various definitions.
-/
structure FunctorPushforwardStructure (S : Presieve X) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ F.obj X) where
/-- an object in the source category -/
preobj : C
/-- a map in the source category which has to be in the presieve -/
premap : preobj ⟶ X
/-- the morphism which appear in the factorisation -/
lift : Y ⟶ F.obj preobj
/-- the condition that `premap` is in the presieve -/
cover : S premap
/-- the factorisation of the morphism -/
fac : f = lift ≫ F.map premap
/-- The fixed choice of a preimage. -/
noncomputable def getFunctorPushforwardStructure {F : C ⥤ D} {S : Presieve X} {Y : D}
{f : Y ⟶ F.obj X} (h : S.functorPushforward F f) : FunctorPushforwardStructure F S f := by
choose Z f' g h₁ h using h
exact ⟨Z, f', g, h₁, h⟩
theorem functorPushforward_comp (R : Presieve X) :
R.functorPushforward (F ⋙ G) = (R.functorPushforward F).functorPushforward G := by
funext x
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨F.obj X, F.map f₁, g₁, ⟨X, f₁, 𝟙 _, h₁, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, ⟨X', f₂, g₂, h₁, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨X', f₂, g₁ ≫ G.map g₂, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem image_mem_functorPushforward (R : Presieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : R f) :
R.functorPushforward F (F.map f) :=
⟨Y, f, 𝟙 _, h, by simp⟩
end FunctorPushforward
end Presieve
/--
For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X` which is closed under
left-composition.
-/
structure Sieve {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (X : C) where
/-- the underlying presieve -/
arrows : Presieve X
/-- stability by precomposition -/
downward_closed : ∀ {Y Z f} (_ : arrows f) (g : Z ⟶ Y), arrows (g ≫ f)
namespace Sieve
instance : CoeFun (Sieve X) fun _ => Presieve X :=
⟨Sieve.arrows⟩
initialize_simps_projections Sieve (arrows → apply)
variable {S R : Sieve X}
attribute [simp] downward_closed
theorem arrows_ext : ∀ {R S : Sieve X}, R.arrows = S.arrows → R = S := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {R S : Sieve X} (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f ↔ S f) : R = S :=
arrows_ext <| funext fun _ => funext fun f => propext <| h f
open Lattice
/-- The supremum of a collection of sieves: the union of them all. -/
protected def sup (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∃ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ f} hf _ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS, hf⟩ := hf
exact ⟨S, hS, S.downward_closed hf _⟩
/-- The infimum of a collection of sieves: the intersection of them all. -/
protected def inf (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∀ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ _} hf g S H := S.downward_closed (hf S H) g
/-- The union of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def union (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∨ R f
downward_closed := by rintro _ _ _ (h | h) g <;> simp [h]
/-- The intersection of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def inter (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∧ R f
downward_closed := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ g
simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- Sieves on an object `X` form a complete lattice.
We generate this directly rather than using the galois insertion for nicer definitional properties.
-/
instance : CompleteLattice (Sieve X) where
le S R := ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S f → R f
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ S₁₂ S₂₃ _ _ h := S₂₃ _ (S₁₂ _ h)
le_antisymm _ _ p q := Sieve.ext fun _ _ => ⟨p _, q _⟩
top :=
{ arrows := fun _ => Set.univ
downward_closed := fun _ _ => ⟨⟩ }
bot :=
{ arrows := fun _ => ∅
downward_closed := False.elim }
sup := Sieve.union
inf := Sieve.inter
sSup := Sieve.sup
sInf := Sieve.inf
le_sSup _ S hS _ _ hf := ⟨S, hS, hf⟩
sSup_le := fun _ _ ha _ _ ⟨b, hb, hf⟩ => (ha b hb) _ hf
sInf_le _ _ hS _ _ h := h _ hS
le_sInf _ _ hS _ _ hf _ hR := hS _ hR _ hf
le_sup_left _ _ _ _ := Or.inl
le_sup_right _ _ _ _ := Or.inr
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ f := by--ℰ S hS Y f := by
rintro (hf | hf)
· exact h₁ _ hf
· exact h₂ _ hf
inf_le_left _ _ _ _ := And.left
inf_le_right _ _ _ _ := And.right
le_inf _ _ _ p q _ _ z := ⟨p _ z, q _ z⟩
le_top _ _ _ _ := trivial
bot_le _ _ _ := False.elim
/-- The maximal sieve always exists. -/
instance sieveInhabited : Inhabited (Sieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sInf Ss f ↔ ∀ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sSup Ss f ↔ ∃ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f := by
simp [sSup, Sieve.sup, setOf]
@[simp]
theorem inter_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊓ S) f ↔ R f ∧ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊔ S) f ↔ R f ∨ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (f : Y ⟶ X) : (⊤ : Sieve X) f :=
trivial
/-- Generate the smallest sieve containing the given set of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def generate (R : Presieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows Z f := ∃ (Y : _) (h : Z ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ X), R g ∧ h ≫ g = f
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z _ ⟨W, g, f, hf, rfl⟩ h
exact ⟨_, h ≫ g, _, hf, by simp⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, and a sieve on each domain of an arrow in the presieve, we can bind to
produce a sieve on `X`.
-/
@[simps]
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y) : Sieve X where
arrows := S.bind fun _ _ h => R h
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z f ⟨W, f, h, hh, hf, rfl⟩ g
exact ⟨_, g ≫ f, _, hh, by simp [hf]⟩
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Sieve.bind S R h`. -/
abbrev BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) :=
Presieve.BindStruct S (fun _ _ hf ↦ R hf) h
open Order Lattice
theorem generate_le_iff (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X) : generate R ≤ S ↔ R ≤ S :=
⟨fun H _ _ hg => H _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hg, id_comp _⟩, fun ss Y f => by
rintro ⟨Z, f, g, hg, rfl⟩
exact S.downward_closed (ss Z hg) f⟩
/-- Show that there is a galois insertion (generate, set_over). -/
def giGenerate : GaloisInsertion (generate : Presieve X → Sieve X) arrows where
gc := generate_le_iff
choice 𝒢 _ := generate 𝒢
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
le_l_u _ _ _ hf := ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hf, id_comp _⟩
theorem le_generate (R : Presieve X) : R ≤ generate R :=
giGenerate.gc.le_u_l R
@[simp]
theorem generate_sieve (S : Sieve X) : generate S = S :=
giGenerate.l_u_eq S
/-- If the identity arrow is in a sieve, the sieve is maximal. -/
theorem id_mem_iff_eq_top : S (𝟙 X) ↔ S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => top_unique fun Y f _ => by simpa using downward_closed _ h f, fun h => h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
/-- If an arrow set contains a split epi, it generates the maximal sieve. -/
theorem generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi {R : Presieve X} (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] (hf : R f) :
generate R = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top]
exact ⟨_, section_ f, f, hf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] :
generate (Presieve.singleton f) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi f (Presieve.singleton_self _)
@[simp]
theorem generate_top : generate (⊤ : Presieve X) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi (𝟙 _) ⟨⟩
@[simp]
lemma comp_mem_iff (i : X ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso i] (S : Sieve Z) :
S (i ≫ f) ↔ S f := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ S.downward_closed H _⟩
convert S.downward_closed H (inv i)
simp
section
variable {I : Type*} {X : C} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X)
/-- The sieve of `X` generated by family of morphisms `Y i ⟶ X`. -/
abbrev ofArrows : Sieve X := generate (Presieve.ofArrows Y f)
lemma ofArrows_mk (i : I) : ofArrows Y f (f i) :=
⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, ⟨i⟩, by simp⟩
lemma mem_ofArrows_iff {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f g ↔ ∃ (i : I) (a : W ⟶ Y i), g = a ≫ f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨T, a, b, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
apply downward_closed _ (ofArrows_mk Y f i)
variable {Y f} {W : C} {g : W ⟶ X} (hg : ofArrows Y f g)
include hg in
lemma ofArrows.exists : ∃ (i : I) (h : W ⟶ Y i), g = h ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨_, h, _, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, h, rfl⟩
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a choice of `i` such that `g`
factors through `f i`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.i : I := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a morphism `h : W ⟶ Y (i hg)` such
that `h ≫ f (i hg) = g`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.h : W ⟶ Y (i hg) := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ofArrows.fac : h hg ≫ f (i hg) = g :=
(ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose_spec.symm
end
/-- The sieve generated by two morphisms. -/
abbrev ofTwoArrows {U V X : C} (i : U ⟶ X) (j : V ⟶ X) : Sieve X :=
Sieve.ofArrows (Y := pairFunction U V) (fun k ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn k i j)
/-- The sieve of `X : C` that is generated by a family of objects `Y : I → C`:
it consists of morphisms to `X` which factor through at least one of the `Y i`. -/
def ofObjects {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (X : C) : Sieve X where
arrows Z _ := ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i)
downward_closed := by
rintro Z₁ Z₂ p ⟨i, ⟨f⟩⟩ g
exact ⟨i, ⟨g ≫ f⟩⟩
lemma mem_ofObjects_iff {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {Z X : C} (g : Z ⟶ X) :
ofObjects Y X g ↔ ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i) := by rfl
lemma ofArrows_le_ofObjects
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {X : C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
Sieve.ofArrows Y f ≤ Sieve.ofObjects Y X := by
intro W g hg
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff] at hg
obtain ⟨i, a, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, ⟨a⟩⟩
lemma ofArrows_eq_ofObjects {X : C} (hX : IsTerminal X)
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f = ofObjects Y X := by
refine le_antisymm (ofArrows_le_ofObjects Y f) (fun W g => ?_)
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff, mem_ofObjects_iff]
rintro ⟨i, ⟨h⟩⟩
exact ⟨i, h, hX.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Given a morphism `h : Y ⟶ X`, send a sieve S on X to a sieve on Y
as the inverse image of S with `_ ≫ h`.
That is, `Sieve.pullback S h := (≫ h) '⁻¹ S`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (h : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) : Sieve Y where
arrows _ sl := S (sl ≫ h)
downward_closed g := by simp [g]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_id : S.pullback (𝟙 _) = S := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_top {f : Y ⟶ X} : (⊤ : Sieve X).pullback f = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ _ => id
theorem pullback_comp {f : Y ⟶ X} {g : Z ⟶ Y} (S : Sieve X) :
S.pullback (g ≫ f) = (S.pullback f).pullback g := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_inter {f : Y ⟶ X} (S R : Sieve X) :
(S ⊓ R).pullback f = S.pullback f ⊓ R.pullback f := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
theorem mem_iff_pullback_eq_top (f : Y ⟶ X) : S f ↔ S.pullback f = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top, pullback_apply, id_comp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")]
alias pullback_eq_top_iff_mem := mem_iff_pullback_eq_top
|
theorem pullback_eq_top_of_mem (S : Sieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} : S f → S.pullback f = ⊤ :=
(mem_iff_pullback_eq_top f).1
lemma pullback_ofObjects_eq_top
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {X : C} {i : I} (g : X ⟶ Y i) :
ofObjects Y X = ⊤ := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 547 | 553 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogBounds
/-!
# Complex arctangent
This file defines the complex arctangent `Complex.arctan` as
$$\arctan z = -\frac i2 \log \frac{1 + zi}{1 - zi}$$
and shows that it extends `Real.arctan` to the complex plane. Its Taylor series expansion
$$\arctan z = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n + 1} z^{2n + 1},\ |z|<1$$
is proved in `Complex.hasSum_arctan`.
-/
namespace Complex
open scoped Real
/-- The complex arctangent, defined via the complex logarithm. -/
noncomputable def arctan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := -I / 2 * log ((1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I))
| theorem tan_arctan {z : ℂ} (h₁ : z ≠ I) (h₂ : z ≠ -I) : tan (arctan z) = z := by
unfold tan sin cos
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
-- multiply top and bottom by `exp (arctan z * I)`
← mul_div_mul_right _ _ (exp_ne_zero (arctan z * I)), sub_mul, add_mul,
← exp_add, neg_mul, neg_add_cancel, exp_zero, ← exp_add, ← two_mul]
have z₁ : 1 + z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₁
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg] at h₁
exact h₁.symm
have z₂ : 1 - z * I ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h₂
rw [sub_eq_zero, ← div_eq_iff I_ne_zero, div_I, one_mul] at h₂
exact h₂.symm
have key : exp (2 * (arctan z * I)) = (1 + z * I) / (1 - z * I) := by
rw [arctan, ← mul_rotate, ← mul_assoc,
show 2 * (I * (-I / 2)) = 1 by field_simp, one_mul, exp_log]
· exact div_ne_zero z₁ z₂
-- multiply top and bottom by `1 - z * I`
rw [key, ← mul_div_mul_right _ _ z₂, sub_mul, add_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ z₂, one_mul,
show _ / _ * I = -(I * I) * z by ring, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arctan.lean | 26 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard,
Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov, Yakov Pechersky, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
/-!
# Operations on `Subsemigroup`s
In this file we define various operations on `Subsemigroup`s and `MulHom`s.
## Main definitions
### Conversion between multiplicative and additive definitions
* `Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup`, `Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'`,
`AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup`, `AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'`:
convert between multiplicative and additive subsemigroups of `M`,
`Multiplicative M`, and `Additive M`. These are stated as `OrderIso`s.
### (Commutative) semigroup structure on a subsemigroup
* `Subsemigroup.toSemigroup`, `Subsemigroup.toCommSemigroup`: a subsemigroup inherits a
(commutative) semigroup structure.
### Operations on subsemigroups
* `Subsemigroup.comap`: preimage of a subsemigroup under a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup
of the domain;
* `Subsemigroup.map`: image of a subsemigroup under a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup of
the codomain;
* `Subsemigroup.prod`: product of two subsemigroups `s : Subsemigroup M` and `t : Subsemigroup N`
as a subsemigroup of `M × N`;
### Semigroup homomorphisms between subsemigroups
* `Subsemigroup.subtype`: embedding of a subsemigroup into the ambient semigroup.
* `Subsemigroup.inclusion`: given two subsemigroups `S`, `T` such that `S ≤ T`, `S.inclusion T` is
the inclusion of `S` into `T` as a semigroup homomorphism;
* `MulEquiv.subsemigroupCongr`: converts a proof of `S = T` into a semigroup isomorphism between
`S` and `T`.
* `Subsemigroup.prodEquiv`: semigroup isomorphism between `s.prod t` and `s × t`;
### Operations on `MulHom`s
* `MulHom.srange`: range of a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup of the codomain;
* `MulHom.restrict`: restrict a semigroup homomorphism to a subsemigroup;
* `MulHom.codRestrict`: restrict the codomain of a semigroup homomorphism to a subsemigroup;
* `MulHom.srangeRestrict`: restrict a semigroup homomorphism to its range;
### Implementation notes
This file follows closely `GroupTheory/Submonoid/Operations.lean`, omitting only that which is
necessary.
## Tags
subsemigroup, range, product, map, comap
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {M N P σ : Type*}
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section
variable [Mul M]
/-- Subsemigroups of semigroup `M` are isomorphic to additive subsemigroups of `Additive M`. -/
@[simps]
def Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup : Subsemigroup M ≃o AddSubsemigroup (Additive M) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S
add_mem' := S.mul_mem' }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' := S.add_mem' }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Additive subsemigroups of an additive semigroup `Additive M` are isomorphic to subsemigroups
of `M`. -/
abbrev AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup' : AddSubsemigroup (Additive M) ≃o Subsemigroup M :=
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup.symm
theorem Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup_closure (S : Set M) :
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup (Subsemigroup.closure S) =
AddSubsemigroup.closure (Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup.le_symm_apply.1 <|
Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Additive M)))
(AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 (Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := M)))
theorem AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'_closure (S : Set (Additive M)) :
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup' (AddSubsemigroup.closure S) =
Subsemigroup.closure (Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'.le_symm_apply.1 <|
AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 (Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := M)))
(Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Additive M))
end
section
variable {A : Type*} [Add A]
/-- Additive subsemigroups of an additive semigroup `A` are isomorphic to
multiplicative subsemigroups of `Multiplicative A`. -/
@[simps]
def AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup : AddSubsemigroup A ≃o Subsemigroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' := S.add_mem' }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S
add_mem' := S.mul_mem' }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Subsemigroups of a semigroup `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subsemigroups
of `A`. -/
abbrev Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup' : Subsemigroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubsemigroup A :=
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup.symm
theorem AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup_closure (S : Set A) :
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup (AddSubsemigroup.closure S) =
Subsemigroup.closure (Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
(Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := A))
theorem Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'_closure (S : Set (Multiplicative A)) :
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup' (Subsemigroup.closure S) =
AddSubsemigroup.closure (Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := A))
(AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
end
namespace Subsemigroup
open Set
/-!
### `comap` and `map`
-/
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (S : Subsemigroup M)
/-- The preimage of a subsemigroup along a semigroup homomorphism is a subsemigroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubsemigroup` along an `AddSemigroup` homomorphism is an
`AddSubsemigroup`."]
def comap (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup N) :
Subsemigroup M where
carrier := f ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' ha hb := show f (_ * _) ∈ S by rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem ha hb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comap (S : Subsemigroup N) (f : M →ₙ* N) : (S.comap f : Set M) = f ⁻¹' S :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_comap {S : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} {x : M} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_comap (S : Subsemigroup P) (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_id (S : Subsemigroup P) : S.comap (MulHom.id _) = S :=
ext (by simp)
/-- The image of a subsemigroup along a semigroup homomorphism is a subsemigroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubsemigroup` along an `AddSemigroup` homomorphism is
an `AddSubsemigroup`."]
def map (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup M) : Subsemigroup N where
carrier := f '' S
mul_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x * y, @mul_mem (Subsemigroup M) M _ _ _ _ _ _ hx hy, by rw [map_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup M) : (S.map f : Set N) = f '' S :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_map {f : M →ₙ* N} {S : Subsemigroup M} {y : N} : y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : M →ₙ* N) {S : Subsemigroup M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup M) (x : S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) : (S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| image_image _ _ _
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Subsemigroup.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem mem_map_iff_mem {f : M →ₙ* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) {S : Subsemigroup M} {x : M} :
f x ∈ S.map f ↔ x ∈ S :=
hf.mem_set_image
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : M →ₙ* N} {S : Subsemigroup M} {T : Subsemigroup N} :
S.map f ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T.comap f :=
image_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem gc_map_comap (f : M →ₙ* N) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ =>
map_le_iff_le_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_of_le_comap {T : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} : S ≤ T.comap f → S.map f ≤ T :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_of_map_le {T : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} : S.map f ≤ T → S ≤ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_map {f : M →ₙ* N} : S ≤ (S.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_le {S : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} : (S.comap f).map f ≤ S :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[to_additive]
theorem monotone_map {f : M →ₙ* N} : Monotone (map f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
@[to_additive]
theorem monotone_comap {f : M →ₙ* N} : Monotone (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).monotone_u
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comap_map {f : M →ₙ* N} : ((S.map f).comap f).map f = S.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_map_comap {S : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} :
((S.comap f).map f).comap f = S.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_sup (S T : Subsemigroup M) (f : M →ₙ* N) : (S ⊔ T).map f = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₙ* N) (s : ι → Subsemigroup M) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf (S T : Subsemigroup M) (f : M →ₙ* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(S ⊓ T).map f = S.map f ⊓ T.map f := SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iInf {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (f : M →ₙ* N) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : ι → Subsemigroup M) : (iInf s).map f = ⨅ i, (s i).map f := by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
simpa using (Set.injOn_of_injective hf).image_iInter_eq (s := SetLike.coe ∘ s)
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_inf (S T : Subsemigroup N) (f : M →ₙ* N) : (S ⊓ T).comap f = S.comap f ⊓ T.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : M →ₙ* N) (s : ι → Subsemigroup N) :
(iInf s).comap f = ⨅ i, (s i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_bot (f : M →ₙ* N) : (⊥ : Subsemigroup M).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_top (f : M →ₙ* N) : (⊤ : Subsemigroup N).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id (S : Subsemigroup M) : S.map (MulHom.id M) = S :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable {ι : Type*} {f : M →ₙ* N}
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
@[to_additive "`map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective."]
def gciMapComap (hf : Function.Injective f) : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by simp [mem_comap, mem_map, hf.eq_iff]
variable (hf : Function.Injective f)
include hf
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (S : Subsemigroup M) : (S.map f).comap f = S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (S T : Subsemigroup M) : (S.map f ⊓ T.map f).comap f = S ⊓ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective (S : ι → Subsemigroup M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (S T : Subsemigroup M) : (S.map f ⊔ T.map f).comap f = S ⊔ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective (S : ι → Subsemigroup M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective {S T : Subsemigroup M} : S.map f ≤ T.map f ↔ S ≤ T :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
end GaloisCoinsertion
section GaloisInsertion
variable {ι : Type*} {f : M →ₙ* N} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
@[to_additive "`map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective."]
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x h =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
mem_map.2 ⟨y, by simp [hy, h]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (S : Subsemigroup N) : (S.comap f).map f = S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (S T : Subsemigroup N) :
(S.comap f ⊓ T.comap f).map f = S ⊓ T :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (S : ι → Subsemigroup N) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (S T : Subsemigroup N) :
(S.comap f ⊔ T.comap f).map f = S ⊔ T :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (S : ι → Subsemigroup N) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective {S T : Subsemigroup N} : S.comap f ≤ T.comap f ↔ S ≤ T :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
end GaloisInsertion
end Subsemigroup
namespace Subsemigroup
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (S : Subsemigroup M)
/-- The top subsemigroup is isomorphic to the semigroup. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The top additive subsemigroup is isomorphic to the additive semigroup."]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subsemigroup M) ≃* M where
toFun x := x
invFun x := ⟨x, mem_top x⟩
left_inv x := x.eta _
right_inv _ := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem topEquiv_toMulHom :
((topEquiv : _ ≃* M) : _ →ₙ* M) = MulMemClass.subtype (⊤ : Subsemigroup M) :=
rfl
/-- A subsemigroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
@[to_additive "An additive subsemigroup is isomorphic to its image under an injective function"]
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₙ* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) : S ≃* S.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f S hf with map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_mul f _ _) }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : M →ₙ* N) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : S) :
(equivMapOfInjective S f hf x : N) = f x :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_closure_coe_preimage {s : Set M} :
closure ((Subtype.val : closure s → M) ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x _ ↦ Subtype.recOn x fun _ hx' ↦
closure_induction (fun _ h ↦ subset_closure h) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ mul_mem) hx'
/-- Given `Subsemigroup`s `s`, `t` of semigroups `M`, `N` respectively, `s × t` as a subsemigroup
of `M × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubsemigroup`s `s`, `t` of `AddSemigroup`s `A`, `B` respectively,
`s × t` as an `AddSubsemigroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (s : Subsemigroup M) (t : Subsemigroup N) : Subsemigroup (M × N) where
carrier := s ×ˢ t
mul_mem' hp hq := ⟨s.mul_mem hp.1 hq.1, t.mul_mem hp.2 hq.2⟩
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (s : Subsemigroup M) (t : Subsemigroup N) :
(s.prod t : Set (M × N)) = (s : Set M) ×ˢ (t : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {s : Subsemigroup M} {t : Subsemigroup N} {p : M × N} :
p ∈ s.prod t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono {s₁ s₂ : Subsemigroup M} {t₁ t₂ : Subsemigroup N} (hs : s₁ ≤ s₂) (ht : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
s₁.prod t₁ ≤ s₂.prod t₂ :=
Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (s : Subsemigroup M) : s.prod (⊤ : Subsemigroup N) = s.comap (MulHom.fst M N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MulHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (s : Subsemigroup N) : (⊤ : Subsemigroup M).prod s = s.comap (MulHom.snd M N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MulHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subsemigroup M).prod (⊤ : Subsemigroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subsemigroup M).prod (⊥ : Subsemigroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
/-- The product of subsemigroups is isomorphic to their product as semigroups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"The product of additive subsemigroups is isomorphic to their product as additive semigroups"]
def prodEquiv (s : Subsemigroup M) (t : Subsemigroup N) : s.prod t ≃* s × t :=
{ (Equiv.Set.prod (s : Set M) (t : Set N)) with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
open MulHom
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : M ≃* N} {K : Subsemigroup M} {x : N} :
x ∈ K.map (f : M →ₙ* N) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K :=
@Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (K : Set M) f.toEquiv x
@[to_additive]
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : M ≃* N) (K : Subsemigroup M) :
K.map (f : M →ₙ* N) = K.comap (f.symm : N →ₙ* M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : N ≃* M) (K : Subsemigroup M) :
K.comap (f : N →ₙ* M) = K.map (f.symm : M →ₙ* N) :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_equiv_top (f : M ≃* N) : (⊤ : Subsemigroup M).map (f : M →ₙ* N) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_univ.trans f.surjective.range_eq
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {s : Subsemigroup M} {t : Subsemigroup N} {u : Subsemigroup (M × N)} :
u ≤ s.prod t ↔ u.map (fst M N) ≤ s ∧ u.map (snd M N) ≤ t := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).1
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).2
· rintro ⟨hH, hK⟩ ⟨x1, x2⟩ h
exact ⟨hH ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, hK ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
end Subsemigroup
namespace MulHom
open Subsemigroup
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (S : Subsemigroup M)
/-- The range of a semigroup homomorphism is a subsemigroup. See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
@[to_additive "The range of an `AddHom` is an `AddSubsemigroup`."]
def srange (f : M →ₙ* N) : Subsemigroup N :=
((⊤ : Subsemigroup M).map f).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_srange (f : M →ₙ* N) : (f.srange : Set N) = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_srange {f : M →ₙ* N} {y : N} : y ∈ f.srange ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
private theorem srange_mk_aux_mul {f : M → N} (hf : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y)
{x y : N} (hx : x ∈ Set.range f) (hy : y ∈ Set.range f) :
x * y ∈ Set.range f :=
(srange ⟨f, hf⟩).mul_mem hx hy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem srange_mk (f : M → N) (hf) :
srange ⟨f, hf⟩ = ⟨Set.range f, srange_mk_aux_mul hf⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem srange_eq_map (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.srange = (⊤ : Subsemigroup M).map f :=
copy_eq _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_srange (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.srange.map g = (g.comp f).srange := by
simpa only [srange_eq_map] using (⊤ : Subsemigroup M).map_map g f
@[to_additive]
theorem srange_eq_top_iff_surjective {N} [Mul N] {f : M →ₙ* N} :
f.srange = (⊤ : Subsemigroup N) ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans <| Iff.trans (by rw [coe_srange, coe_top]) Set.range_eq_univ
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias srange_top_iff_surjective := srange_eq_top_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective semigroup hom is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"The range of a surjective `AddSemigroup` hom is the whole of the codomain."]
theorem srange_eq_top_of_surjective {N} [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
f.srange = (⊤ : Subsemigroup N) :=
srange_eq_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias srange_top_of_surjective := srange_eq_top_of_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mclosure_preimage_le (f : M →ₙ* N) (s : Set N) : closure (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
closure_le.2 fun _ hx => SetLike.mem_coe.2 <| mem_comap.2 <| subset_closure hx
/-- The image under a semigroup hom of the subsemigroup generated by a set equals the subsemigroup
generated by the image of the set. -/
@[to_additive
"The image under an `AddSemigroup` hom of the `AddSubsemigroup` generated by a set
equals the `AddSubsemigroup` generated by the image of the set."]
theorem map_mclosure (f : M →ₙ* N) (s : Set M) : (closure s).map f = closure (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) (Subsemigroup.gi N).gc (Subsemigroup.gi M).gc
fun _ ↦ rfl
/-- Restriction of a semigroup hom to a subsemigroup of the domain. -/
@[to_additive "Restriction of an AddSemigroup hom to an `AddSubsemigroup` of the domain."]
def restrict {N : Type*} [Mul N] [SetLike σ M] [MulMemClass σ M] (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : σ) : S →ₙ* N :=
f.comp (MulMemClass.subtype S)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem restrict_apply {N : Type*} [Mul N] [SetLike σ M] [MulMemClass σ M] (f : M →ₙ* N) {S : σ}
(x : S) : f.restrict S x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Restriction of a semigroup hom to a subsemigroup of the codomain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Restriction of an `AddSemigroup` hom to an `AddSubsemigroup` of the codomain."]
def codRestrict [SetLike σ N] [MulMemClass σ N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : σ) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) :
M →ₙ* S where
toFun n := ⟨f n, h n⟩
map_mul' x y := Subtype.eq (map_mul f x y)
/-- Restriction of a semigroup hom to its range interpreted as a subsemigroup. -/
@[to_additive "Restriction of an `AddSemigroup` hom to its range interpreted as a subsemigroup."]
def srangeRestrict {N} [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : M →ₙ* f.srange :=
(f.codRestrict f.srange) fun x => ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_srangeRestrict {N} [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (x : M) : (f.srangeRestrict x : N) = f x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem srangeRestrict_surjective (f : M →ₙ* N) : Function.Surjective f.srangeRestrict :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[to_additive prod_map_comap_prod']
theorem prod_map_comap_prod' {M' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Mul M'] [Mul N'] (f : M →ₙ* N)
(g : M' →ₙ* N') (S : Subsemigroup N) (S' : Subsemigroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
/-- The `MulHom` from the preimage of a subsemigroup to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The `AddHom` from the preimage of an additive subsemigroup to itself."]
def subsemigroupComap (f : M →ₙ* N) (N' : Subsemigroup N) :
N'.comap f →ₙ* N' where
toFun x := ⟨f x, x.prop⟩
map_mul' x y := Subtype.eq <| map_mul (M := M) (N := N) f x y
/-- The `MulHom` from a subsemigroup to its image.
See `MulEquiv.subsemigroupMap` for a variant for `MulEquiv`s. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"the `AddHom` from an additive subsemigroup to its image. See
`AddEquiv.addSubsemigroupMap` for a variant for `AddEquiv`s."]
def subsemigroupMap (f : M →ₙ* N) (M' : Subsemigroup M) :
M' →ₙ* M'.map f where
toFun x := ⟨f x, ⟨x, x.prop, rfl⟩⟩
map_mul' x y := Subtype.eq <| map_mul (M := M) (N := N) f x y
@[to_additive]
theorem subsemigroupMap_surjective (f : M →ₙ* N) (M' : Subsemigroup M) :
Function.Surjective (f.subsemigroupMap M') := by
rintro ⟨_, x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩
end MulHom
namespace Subsemigroup
open MulHom
| variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (S : Subsemigroup M)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subsemigroup/Operations.lean | 672 | 673 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
/-!
# Gaussian integral
We prove various versions of the formula for the Gaussian integral:
* `integral_gaussian`: for real `b` we have `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = √(π / b)`.
* `integral_gaussian_complex`: for complex `b` with `0 < re b` we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2)`.
* `integral_gaussian_Ioi` and `integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi`: variants for integrals over `Ioi 0`.
* `Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq`: the formula `Γ (1 / 2) = √π`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Real Topology
open Complex hiding exp abs_of_nonneg
theorem exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg {p b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (hp : 1 < p) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
suffices Tendsto (fun x => x * (b * x ^ (p - 1) + -1)) atTop atTop by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ this
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)) (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [rpow_sub_one hx.ne']
field_simp [hx.ne']
ring
apply tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop₀
refine tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop (-1 : ℝ) ?_
exact Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith))
theorem exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb one_lt_two
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg (s : ℝ) {b p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
apply ((isBigO_refl (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s) atTop).mul_isLittleO
(exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb hp)).trans
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO s
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
| simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg s one_lt_two hb
theorem integrableOn_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p s : ℝ} (hs : -1 < s) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/GaussianIntegral.lean | 57 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
(by simp [IH'])).1
refine ⟨f, A, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
conv_rhs => rw [hf]
rw [seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
apply
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)))) (by simp [A])).2
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
symmetric relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m ≠ n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
[IsSymm α r] (h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ Pairwise (r on f) := by
rcases exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists P r h with ⟨f, hf, hf'⟩
refine ⟨f, hf, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | rfl | h)
· exact hf' m n h
· exact (hmn rfl).elim
· unfold Function.onFun
apply symm
exact hf' n m h
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 752 | 754 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Louis Carlin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Louis Carlin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic
/-!
# Lemmas about Euclidean domains
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: states Bézout's lemma for Euclidean domains.
-/
universe u
namespace EuclideanDomain
variable {R : Type u}
variable [EuclideanDomain R]
/-- The well founded relation in a Euclidean Domain satisfying `a % b ≺ b` for `b ≠ 0` -/
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => EuclideanDomain.r
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toMulDivCancelClass : MulDivCancelClass R where
mul_div_cancel a b hb := by
refine (eq_of_sub_eq_zero ?_).symm
by_contra h
have := mul_right_not_lt b h
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm (_ / _), sub_eq_iff_eq_add'.2 (div_add_mod (a * b) b).symm] at this
exact this (mod_lt _ hb)
theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {R : Type*} [EuclideanDomain R] (a b : R) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
calc
a % b = b * (a / b) + a % b - b * (a / b) := (add_sub_cancel_left _ _).symm
_ = a - b * (a / b) := by rw [div_add_mod]
theorem val_dvd_le : ∀ a b : R, b ∣ a → a ≠ 0 → ¬a ≺ b
| _, b, ⟨d, rfl⟩, ha => mul_left_not_lt b (mt (by rintro rfl; exact mul_zero _) ha)
@[simp]
theorem mod_eq_zero {a b : R} : a % b = 0 ↔ b ∣ a :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← div_add_mod a b, h, add_zero]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _, fun ⟨c, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, add_zero]
haveI := Classical.dec
by_cases b0 : b = 0
· simp only [b0, zero_mul]
· rw [mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ b0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : R) : a % a = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 dvd_rfl
theorem dvd_mod_iff {a b c : R} (h : c ∣ b) : c ∣ a % b ↔ c ∣ a := by
rw [← dvd_add_right (h.mul_right _), div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : R) : a % 1 = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : R) : 0 % b = 0 :=
mod_eq_zero.2 (dvd_zero _)
@[simp]
theorem zero_div {a : R} : 0 / a = 0 :=
by_cases (fun a0 : a = 0 => a0.symm ▸ div_zero 0) fun a0 => by
simpa only [zero_mul] using mul_div_cancel_right₀ 0 a0
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : R} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel_right₀ 1 a0
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_left {a b c : R} (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c) : a = c / b := by
rw [← h, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hb]
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq_right {a b c : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c) : b = c / a := by
rw [← h, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ ha]
theorem mul_div_assoc (x : R) {y z : R} (h : z ∣ y) : x * y / z = x * (y / z) := by
by_cases hz : z = 0
· subst hz
rw [div_zero, div_zero, mul_zero]
rcases h with ⟨p, rfl⟩
rw [mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hz, mul_left_comm, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hz]
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {a b : R} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hab : b ∣ a) : b * (a / b) = a := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc _ hab, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hb]
-- This generalizes `Int.div_one`, see note [simp-normal form]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (p : R) : p / 1 = p :=
(EuclideanDomain.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left (one_ne_zero' R) (mul_one p)).symm
theorem div_dvd_of_dvd {p q : R} (hpq : q ∣ p) : p / q ∣ p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, zero_dvd_iff] at hpq
rw [hpq]
exact dvd_zero _
use q
rw [mul_comm, ← EuclideanDomain.mul_div_assoc _ hpq, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hq]
theorem dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : R} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp only [div_zero, dvd_zero]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
refine ⟨d, ?_⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ ha]
section GCD
variable [DecidableEq R]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (a : R) : gcd a 0 = a := by
rw [gcd]
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [h, zero_mod, gcd_zero_left]
theorem gcd_val (a b : R) : gcd a b = gcd (b % a) a := by
rw [gcd]
split_ifs with h <;> [simp only [h, mod_zero, gcd_zero_right]; rfl]
theorem gcd_dvd (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ a ∧ gcd a b ∣ b :=
GCD.induction a b
(fun b => by
rw [gcd_zero_left]
exact ⟨dvd_zero _, dvd_rfl⟩)
fun a b _ ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ => by
rw [gcd_val]
exact ⟨IH₂, (dvd_mod_iff IH₂).1 IH₁⟩
theorem gcd_dvd_left (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ a :=
(gcd_dvd a b).left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (a b : R) : gcd a b ∣ b :=
(gcd_dvd a b).right
protected theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {a b : R} : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [h] using gcd_dvd a b, by
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact gcd_zero_right _⟩
theorem dvd_gcd {a b c : R} : c ∣ a → c ∣ b → c ∣ gcd a b :=
GCD.induction a b (fun _ _ H => by simpa only [gcd_zero_left] using H) fun a b _ IH ca cb => by
rw [gcd_val]
exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff ca).2 cb) ca
theorem gcd_eq_left {a b : R} : gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
apply gcd_dvd_right, fun h => by rw [gcd_val, mod_eq_zero.2 h, gcd_zero_left]⟩
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left (a : R) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
gcd_eq_left.2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (a : R) : gcd a a = a :=
gcd_eq_left.2 dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y : R) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
GCD.induction x y
(by
intros
rw [xgcd_zero_left, gcd_zero_left])
fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [xgcdAux_rec h, if_neg h, IH]
rw [← gcd_val]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y : R) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
private def P (a b : R) : R × R × R → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : R) = a * s + b * t
theorem xgcdAux_P (a b : R) {r r' : R} {s t s' t'} (p : P a b (r, s, t))
(p' : P a b (r', s', t')) : P a b (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using GCD.induction generalizing s t s' t' with
| H0 n => simpa only [xgcd_zero_left]
| H1 _ _ h IH =>
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]
refine IH ?_ p
unfold P at p p' ⊢
dsimp
rw [mul_sub, mul_sub, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← p', sub_sub, mul_comm _ s, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ t, ← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, ← p, mod_eq_sub_mul_div]
/-- An explicit version of **Bézout's lemma** for Euclidean domains. -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab (a b : R) : (gcd a b : R) = a * gcdA a b + b * gcdB a b := by
have :=
@xgcdAux_P _ _ _ a b a b 1 0 0 1 (by dsimp [P]; rw [mul_one, mul_zero, add_zero])
(by dsimp [P]; rw [mul_one, mul_zero, zero_add])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) (R : Type*) [e : EuclideanDomain R] : NoZeroDivisors R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := fun {a b} h =>
or_iff_not_and_not.2 fun h0 => h0.1 <| by rw [← mul_div_cancel_right₀ a h0.2, h, zero_div] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) (R : Type*) [e : EuclideanDomain R] : IsDomain R :=
{ e, NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain R with }
end GCD
section LCM
variable [DecidableEq R]
theorem dvd_lcm_left (x y : R) : x ∣ lcm x y :=
by_cases
(fun hxy : gcd x y = 0 => by
| rw [lcm, hxy, div_zero]
exact dvd_zero _)
fun hxy =>
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := (gcd_dvd x y).2
⟨z, Eq.symm <| eq_div_of_mul_eq_left hxy <| by rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← hz]⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/EuclideanDomain/Basic.lean | 225 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Nathaniel Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Modules over a ring
In this file we define
* `Module R M` : an additive commutative monoid `M` is a `Module` over a
`Semiring R` if for `r : R` and `x : M` their "scalar multiplication" `r • x : M` is defined, and
the operation `•` satisfies some natural associativity and distributivity axioms similar to those
on a ring.
## Implementation notes
In typical mathematical usage, our definition of `Module` corresponds to "semimodule", and the
word "module" is reserved for `Module R M` where `R` is a `Ring` and `M` an `AddCommGroup`.
If `R` is a `Field` and `M` an `AddCommGroup`, `M` would be called an `R`-vector space.
Since those assumptions can be made by changing the typeclasses applied to `R` and `M`,
without changing the axioms in `Module`, mathlib calls everything a `Module`.
In older versions of mathlib3, we had separate abbreviations for semimodules and vector spaces.
This caused inference issues in some cases, while not providing any real advantages, so we decided
to use a canonical `Module` typeclass throughout.
## Tags
semimodule, module, vector space
-/
assert_not_exists Field Invertible Pi.single_smul₀ RingHom Set.indicator Multiset Units
open Function Set
universe u v
variable {R S M M₂ : Type*}
/-- A module is a generalization of vector spaces to a scalar semiring.
It consists of a scalar semiring `R` and an additive monoid of "vectors" `M`,
connected by a "scalar multiplication" operation `r • x : M`
(where `r : R` and `x : M`) with some natural associativity and
distributivity axioms similar to those on a ring. -/
@[ext]
class Module (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] extends
DistribMulAction R M where
/-- Scalar multiplication distributes over addition from the right. -/
protected add_smul : ∀ (r s : R) (x : M), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x
/-- Scalar multiplication by zero gives zero. -/
protected zero_smul : ∀ x : M, (0 : R) • x = 0
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (r s : R) (x : M)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A module over a semiring automatically inherits a `MulActionWithZero` structure. -/
instance (priority := 100) Module.toMulActionWithZero
{R M} {_ : Semiring R} {_ : AddCommMonoid M} [Module R M] : MulActionWithZero R M :=
{ (inferInstance : MulAction R M) with
smul_zero := smul_zero
zero_smul := Module.zero_smul }
theorem add_smul : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
Module.add_smul r s x
theorem Convex.combo_self {a b : R} (h : a + b = 1) (x : M) : a • x + b • x = x := by
rw [← add_smul, h, one_smul]
variable (R)
theorem two_smul : (2 : R) • x = x + x := by rw [← one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul, one_smul]
/-- Pullback a `Module` structure along an injective additive monoid homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.module [AddCommMonoid M₂] [SMul R M₂] (f : M₂ →+ M)
(hf : Injective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : Module R M₂ :=
{ hf.distribMulAction f smul with
add_smul := fun c₁ c₂ x => hf <| by simp only [smul, f.map_add, add_smul]
zero_smul := fun x => hf <| by simp only [smul, zero_smul, f.map_zero] }
/-- Pushforward a `Module` structure along a surjective additive monoid homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Surjective.module [AddCommMonoid M₂] [SMul R M₂] (f : M →+ M₂)
(hf : Surjective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : Module R M₂ :=
{ toDistribMulAction := hf.distribMulAction f smul
add_smul := fun c₁ c₂ x => by
rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_smul, ← smul, ← f.map_add]
zero_smul := fun x => by
rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← f.map_zero, ← smul, zero_smul] }
variable {R}
theorem Module.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (zero_eq_one : (0 : R) = 1) : x = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R x, ← zero_eq_one, zero_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smul_add_one_sub_smul {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Module R M] {r : R} {m : M} :
r • m + (1 - r) • m = m := by rw [← add_smul, add_sub_cancel, one_smul]
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M]
theorem Convex.combo_eq_smul_sub_add [Module R M] {x y : M} {a b : R} (h : a + b = 1) :
a • x + b • y = b • (y - x) + x :=
calc
a • x + b • y = b • y - b • x + (a • x + b • x) := by rw [sub_add_add_cancel, add_comm]
_ = b • (y - x) + x := by rw [smul_sub, Convex.combo_self h]
end AddCommGroup
-- We'll later use this to show `Module ℕ M` and `Module ℤ M` are subsingletons.
/-- A variant of `Module.ext` that's convenient for term-mode. -/
theorem Module.ext' {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (P Q : Module R M)
(w : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), (haveI := P; r • m) = (haveI := Q; r • m)) :
P = Q := by
ext
exact w _ _
section Module
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (r : R) (x : M)
@[simp]
theorem neg_smul : -r • x = -(r • x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by rw [← add_smul, neg_add_cancel, zero_smul]
theorem neg_smul_neg : -r • -x = r • x := by rw [neg_smul, smul_neg, neg_neg]
variable (R)
theorem neg_one_smul (x : M) : (-1 : R) • x = -x := by simp
variable {R}
theorem sub_smul (r s : R) (y : M) : (r - s) • y = r • y - s • y := by
simp [add_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
end Module
/-- A module over a `Subsingleton` semiring is a `Subsingleton`. We cannot register this
as an instance because Lean has no way to guess `R`. -/
protected theorem Module.subsingleton (R M : Type*) [MonoidWithZero R] [Subsingleton R] [Zero M]
[MulActionWithZero R M] : Subsingleton M :=
MulActionWithZero.subsingleton R M
/-- A semiring is `Nontrivial` provided that there exists a nontrivial module over this semiring. -/
protected theorem Module.nontrivial (R M : Type*) [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial M] [Zero M]
[MulActionWithZero R M] : Nontrivial R :=
MulActionWithZero.nontrivial R M
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 910) Semiring.toModule [Semiring R] : Module R R where
smul_add := mul_add
add_smul := add_mul
zero_smul := zero_mul
smul_zero := mul_zero
instance [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] : DistribSMul R R where
smul_add := left_distrib
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Defs.lean | 625 | 629 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Galois.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FintypeCat
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.SingleObj
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
/-!
# Galois objects in Galois categories
We define when a connected object of a Galois category `C` is Galois in a fiber functor independent
way and show equivalent characterisations.
## Main definitions
* `IsGalois` : Connected object `X` of `C` such that `X / Aut X` is terminal.
## Main results
* `galois_iff_pretransitive` : A connected object `X` is Galois if and only if `Aut X`
acts transitively on `F.obj X` for a fiber functor `F`.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ v₁ v₂ v w
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace PreGaloisCategory
open Limits Functor
noncomputable instance {G : Type v} [Group G] [Finite G] :
PreservesColimitsOfShape (SingleObj G) FintypeCat.incl.{w} := by
choose G' hg hf e using Finite.exists_type_univ_nonempty_mulEquiv G
exact Limits.preservesColimitsOfShape_of_equiv (Classical.choice e).toSingleObjEquiv.symm _
/-- A connected object `X` of `C` is Galois if the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal. -/
class IsGalois {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C] [GaloisCategory C] (X : C) : Prop
extends IsConnected X where
quotientByAutTerminal : Nonempty (IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X)
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂, u₁} C]
/-- The natural action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X`. -/
instance autMulFiber (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) (X : C) : MulAction (Aut X) (F.obj X) where
smul σ a := F.map σ.hom a
one_smul a := by
show F.map (𝟙 X) a = a
simp only [map_id, FintypeCat.id_apply]
mul_smul g h a := by
show F.map (h.hom ≫ g.hom) a = (F.map h.hom ≫ F.map g.hom) a
simp only [map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply]
variable [GaloisCategory C] (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) [FiberFunctor F]
/-- For a connected object `X` of `C`, the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal if and only if
the quotient `F.obj X / Aut X` has exactly one element. -/
noncomputable def quotientByAutTerminalEquivUniqueQuotient
(X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsTerminal (colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X) ≃
Unique (MulAction.orbitRel.Quotient (Aut X) (F.obj X)) := by
let J : SingleObj (Aut X) ⥤ C := SingleObj.functor (Aut.toEnd X)
let e : (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl).obj (colimit J) ≅ _ :=
preservesColimitIso (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) J ≪≫
(Equiv.toIso <| SingleObj.Types.colimitEquivQuotient (J ⋙ F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl))
apply Equiv.trans
· apply (IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) _).trans
(isLimitEmptyConeEquiv _ (asEmptyCone _) (asEmptyCone _) e)
exact Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
lemma isGalois_iff_aux (X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsGalois X ↔ Nonempty (IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.quotientByAutTerminal, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
/-- Given a fiber functor `F` and a connected object `X` of `C`. Then `X` is Galois if and only if
the natural action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X` is transitive. -/
theorem isGalois_iff_pretransitive (X : C) [IsConnected X] :
IsGalois X ↔ MulAction.IsPretransitive (Aut X) (F.obj X) := by
rw [isGalois_iff_aux, Equiv.nonempty_congr <| quotientByAutTerminalEquivUniqueQuotient F X]
exact (MulAction.pretransitive_iff_unique_quotient_of_nonempty (Aut X) (F.obj X)).symm
/-- If `X` is Galois, the quotient `X / Aut X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def isTerminalQuotientOfIsGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] :
IsTerminal <| colimit <| SingleObj.functor <| Aut.toEnd X :=
Nonempty.some IsGalois.quotientByAutTerminal
/-- If `X` is Galois, then the action of `Aut X` on `F.obj X` is
transitive for every fiber functor `F`. -/
instance isPretransitive_of_isGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] :
MulAction.IsPretransitive (Aut X) (F.obj X) := by
rw [← isGalois_iff_pretransitive]
infer_instance
lemma stabilizer_normal_of_isGalois (X : C) [IsGalois X] (x : F.obj X) :
Subgroup.Normal (MulAction.stabilizer (Aut F) x) where
conj_mem n ninstab g := by
rw [MulAction.mem_stabilizer_iff]
show g • n • (g⁻¹ • x) = x
have : ∃ (φ : Aut X), F.map φ.hom x = g⁻¹ • x :=
MulAction.IsPretransitive.exists_smul_eq x (g⁻¹ • x)
obtain ⟨φ, h⟩ := this
rw [← h, mulAction_naturality, ninstab, h]
simp
theorem evaluation_aut_surjective_of_isGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) :
Function.Surjective (fun f : Aut A ↦ F.map f.hom a) :=
MulAction.IsPretransitive.exists_smul_eq a
theorem evaluation_aut_bijective_of_isGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) :
Function.Bijective (fun f : Aut A ↦ F.map f.hom a) :=
⟨evaluation_aut_injective_of_isConnected F A a, evaluation_aut_surjective_of_isGalois F A a⟩
/-- For Galois `A` and a point `a` of the fiber of `A`, the evaluation at `A` as an equivalence. -/
noncomputable def evaluationEquivOfIsGalois (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) : Aut A ≃ F.obj A :=
Equiv.ofBijective _ (evaluation_aut_bijective_of_isGalois F A a)
@[simp]
lemma evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_apply (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a : F.obj A) (φ : Aut A) :
evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a φ = F.map φ.hom a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_symm_fiber (A : C) [IsGalois A] (a b : F.obj A) :
F.map ((evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a).symm b).hom a = b := by
change (evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A a) _ = _
simp
section AutMap
/-- For a morphism from a connected object `A` to a Galois object `B` and an automorphism
of `A`, there exists a unique automorphism of `B` making the canonical diagram commute. -/
lemma exists_autMap {A B : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (σ : Aut A) :
∃! (τ : Aut B), f ≫ τ.hom = σ.hom ≫ f := by
let F := GaloisCategory.getFiberFunctor C
obtain ⟨a⟩ := nonempty_fiber_of_isConnected F A
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F B (F.map f a)).symm (F.map (σ.hom ≫ f) a)
· apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F A B a
simp
· intro τ hτ
apply evaluation_aut_injective_of_isConnected F B (F.map f a)
simpa using congr_fun (F.congr_map hτ) a
/-- A morphism from a connected object to a Galois object induces a map on automorphism
groups. This is a group homomorphism (see `autMapHom`). -/
noncomputable def autMap {A B : C} [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (f : A ⟶ B) (σ : Aut A) :
Aut B :=
(exists_autMap f σ).choose
@[simp]
lemma comp_autMap {A B : C} [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (f : A ⟶ B) (σ : Aut A) :
f ≫ (autMap f σ).hom = σ.hom ≫ f :=
(exists_autMap f σ).choose_spec.left
@[simp]
lemma comp_autMap_apply (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) {A B : C} [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B]
(f : A ⟶ B) (σ : Aut A) (a : F.obj A) :
F.map (autMap f σ).hom (F.map f a) = F.map f (F.map σ.hom a) := by
simpa [-comp_autMap] using congrFun (F.congr_map (comp_autMap f σ)) a
/-- `autMap` is uniquely characterized by making the canonical diagram commute. -/
lemma autMap_unique {A B : C} [IsConnected A] [IsGalois B] (f : A ⟶ B) (σ : Aut A)
(τ : Aut B) (h : f ≫ τ.hom = σ.hom ≫ f) :
autMap f σ = τ :=
((exists_autMap f σ).choose_spec.right τ h).symm
|
@[simp]
lemma autMap_id {A : C} [IsGalois A] : autMap (𝟙 A) = id :=
funext fun σ ↦ autMap_unique (𝟙 A) σ _ (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma autMap_comp {X Y Z : C} [IsConnected X] [IsGalois Y] [IsGalois Z] (f : X ⟶ Y)
(g : Y ⟶ Z) : autMap (f ≫ g) = autMap g ∘ autMap f := by
refine funext fun σ ↦ autMap_unique _ σ _ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, Category.assoc, comp_autMap, ← Category.assoc]
simp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Galois/GaloisObjects.lean | 171 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Bounds
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.ModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics Topology Nat NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂
(isLittleO_of_tendsto fun _ hn ↦ False.elim <| H.ne' <| pow_eq_zero hn) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
(div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr fun _ ↦ div_pow _ _ _
theorem isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ h ▸ isBigO_refl _ _) fun h ↦ (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).isBigO
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
refine (IsLittleO.of_norm_left ?_).of_norm_right
exact (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
open List in
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
theorem TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
TFAE
[∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a < R, ∃ C : ℝ, (0 < C ∨ 0 < R) ∧ ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n, ∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] := by
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have 1 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
tfae_have 3 → 2
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩
tfae_have 2 → 4 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have 4 → 6
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le] using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne')
tfae_have 6 → 5 := fun ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, C, Or.inl H₀, H⟩
tfae_have 5 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩ => by
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n) with (rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩)
· obtain rfl : f = 0 := by
ext n
simpa using H n
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, isBigO_zero _ _⟩
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
isBigO_of_le' _ fun n ↦ (H n).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le⟩
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have 2 → 8
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn
tfae_have 8 → 7 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩
tfae_have 7 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, A ⟨?_, ha⟩, .of_norm_eventuallyLE H⟩
| exact nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans)
tfae_finish
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 111 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Subsingleton
/-!
# Functions that are eventually constant along a filter
In this file we define a predicate `Filter.EventuallyConst f l` saying that a function `f : α → β`
is eventually equal to a constant along a filter `l`. We also prove some basic properties of these
functions.
## Implementation notes
A naive definition of `Filter.EventuallyConst f l` is `∃ y, ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = y`.
However, this proposition is false for empty `α`, `β`.
Instead, we say that `Filter.map f l` is supported on a subsingleton.
This allows us to drop `[Nonempty _]` assumptions here and there.
-/
open Set
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
namespace Filter
/-- The proposition that a function is eventually constant along a filter on the domain. -/
def EventuallyConst (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) : Prop := (map f l).Subsingleton
theorem HasBasis.eventuallyConst_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : EventuallyConst f l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s i, f x = f y :=
(h.map f).subsingleton_iff.trans <| by simp only [Set.Subsingleton, forall_mem_image]
theorem HasBasis.eventuallyConst_iff' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α}
{x : ι → α} (h : l.HasBasis p s) (hx : ∀ i, p i → x i ∈ s i) :
EventuallyConst f l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ y ∈ s i, f y = f (x i) :=
h.eventuallyConst_iff.trans <| exists_congr fun i ↦ and_congr_right fun hi ↦
⟨fun h ↦ (h · · (x i) (hx i hi)), fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a ha ▸ (h b hb).symm⟩
lemma eventuallyConst_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] :
EventuallyConst f l ↔ ∃ x, Tendsto f l (pure x) :=
subsingleton_iff_exists_le_pure
alias ⟨EventuallyConst.exists_tendsto, _⟩ := eventuallyConst_iff_tendsto
theorem EventuallyConst.of_tendsto {x : β} (h : Tendsto f l (pure x)) : EventuallyConst f l :=
have : Nonempty β := ⟨x⟩; eventuallyConst_iff_tendsto.2 ⟨x, h⟩
theorem eventuallyConst_iff_exists_eventuallyEq [Nonempty β] :
EventuallyConst f l ↔ ∃ c, f =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ c :=
subsingleton_iff_exists_singleton_mem
alias ⟨EventuallyConst.eventuallyEq_const, _⟩ := eventuallyConst_iff_exists_eventuallyEq
theorem eventuallyConst_pred' {p : α → Prop} :
EventuallyConst p l ↔ (p =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ False) ∨ (p =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ True) := by
simp only [eventuallyConst_iff_exists_eventuallyEq, Prop.exists_iff]
theorem eventuallyConst_pred {p : α → Prop} :
EventuallyConst p l ↔ (∀ᶠ x in l, p x) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in l, ¬p x) := by
simp [eventuallyConst_pred', or_comm, EventuallyEq]
theorem eventuallyConst_set' {s : Set α} :
EventuallyConst s l ↔ (s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α)) ∨ s =ᶠ[l] univ :=
eventuallyConst_pred'
theorem eventuallyConst_set {s : Set α} :
EventuallyConst s l ↔ (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s) :=
eventuallyConst_pred
|
theorem eventuallyConst_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} :
EventuallyConst (f ⁻¹' s) l ↔ EventuallyConst s (map f l) :=
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/EventuallyConst.lean | 73 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maximal
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Ideals over a ring
This file contains an assortment of definitions and results for `Ideal R`,
the type of (left) ideals over a ring `R`.
Note that over commutative rings, left ideals and two-sided ideals are equivalent.
## Implementation notes
`Ideal R` is implemented using `Submodule R R`, where `•` is interpreted as `*`.
## TODO
Support right ideals, and two-sided ideals over non-commutative rings.
-/
variable {ι α β F : Type*}
open Set Function
open Pointwise
section Semiring
namespace Ideal
variable {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, Semiring (α i)] (I : Π i, Ideal (α i))
section Pi
/-- `Πᵢ Iᵢ` as an ideal of `Πᵢ Rᵢ`. -/
def pi : Ideal (Π i, α i) where
carrier := { x | ∀ i, x i ∈ I i }
zero_mem' i := (I i).zero_mem
add_mem' ha hb i := (I i).add_mem (ha i) (hb i)
smul_mem' a _b hb i := (I i).mul_mem_left (a i) (hb i)
theorem mem_pi (x : Π i, α i) : x ∈ pi I ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ I i :=
Iff.rfl
instance (priority := low) [∀ i, (I i).IsTwoSided] : (pi I).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun _b hb i ↦ mul_mem_right _ _ (hb i)⟩
end Pi
section Commute
variable {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (I : Ideal α) {a b : α}
theorem add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute {m n k : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hk : m + n ≤ k + 1)
(hab : Commute a b) :
(a + b) ^ k ∈ I := by
simp_rw [hab.add_pow, ← Nat.cast_comm]
apply I.sum_mem
intro c _
apply mul_mem_left
by_cases h : m ≤ c
· rw [hab.pow_pow]
exact I.mul_mem_left _ (I.pow_mem_of_pow_mem ha h)
· refine I.mul_mem_left _ (I.pow_mem_of_pow_mem hb ?_)
omega
theorem add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem_of_commute {m n : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hab : Commute a b) :
(a + b) ^ (m + n - 1) ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute ha hb (by rw [← Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]) hab
end Commute
end Ideal
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable {a b : α}
-- A separate namespace definition is needed because the variables were historically in a different
-- order.
namespace Ideal
variable [CommSemiring α] (I : Ideal α)
theorem add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le {m n k : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) (hk : m + n ≤ k + 1) :
(a + b) ^ k ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_mem_of_pow_mem_of_le_of_commute ha hb hk (Commute.all ..)
theorem add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem {m n : ℕ}
(ha : a ^ m ∈ I) (hb : b ^ n ∈ I) :
(a + b) ^ (m + n - 1) ∈ I :=
I.add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem_of_commute ha hb (Commute.all ..)
theorem pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) :
s.sum ^ (Multiset.card s * n + 1) ∈
span ((s.map fun (x : α) ↦ x ^ (n + 1)).toFinset : Set α) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a s hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.toFinset_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Multiset.card_cons, add_pow]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ ?_
intro c _hc
rw [mem_span_insert]
by_cases h : n + 1 ≤ c
· refine ⟨a ^ (c - (n + 1)) * s.sum ^ ((Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1 - c) *
((Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1).choose c, 0, Submodule.zero_mem _, ?_⟩
rw [mul_comm _ (a ^ (n + 1))]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← pow_add, add_zero, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h]
· use 0
simp_rw [zero_mul, zero_add]
refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
replace h : c ≤ n := Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (not_le.mp h)
have : (Multiset.card s + 1) * n + 1 - c = Multiset.card s * n + 1 + (n - c) := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul, add_assoc, add_comm n 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h]
rw [this, pow_add]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (s.sum ^ (Multiset.card s * n + 1)), ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_mem_left _ _ hs
theorem sum_pow_mem_span_pow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ (s.card * n + 1) ∈ span ((fun i => f i ^ (n + 1)) '' s) := by
classical
simpa only [Multiset.card_map, Multiset.map_map, comp_apply, Multiset.toFinset_map,
Finset.coe_image, Finset.val_toFinset] using pow_multiset_sum_mem_span_pow (s.1.map f) n
theorem span_pow_eq_top (s : Set α) (hs : span s = ⊤) (n : ℕ) :
span ((fun (x : α) => x ^ n) '' s) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
rcases n with - | n
· obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· rw [Set.image_empty, hs]
trivial
· exact subset_span ⟨_, hx, pow_zero _⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one, span, Finsupp.mem_span_iff_linearCombination] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
have hf : (f.support.sum fun a => f a * a) = 1 := hf -- Porting note: was `change ... at hf`
have := sum_pow_mem_span_pow f.support (fun a => f a * a) n
rw [hf, one_pow] at this
refine span_le.mpr ?_ this
rintro _ hx
simp_rw [Set.mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x, _, rfl⟩
have : span ({(x : α) ^ (n + 1)} : Set α) ≤ span ((fun x : α => x ^ (n + 1)) '' s) := by
rw [span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact subset_span ⟨x, x.prop, rfl⟩
refine this ?_
rw [mul_pow, mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨f x ^ (n + 1), mul_comm _ _⟩
theorem span_range_pow_eq_top (s : Set α) (hs : span s = ⊤) (n : s → ℕ) :
span (Set.range fun x ↦ x.1 ^ n x) = ⊤ := by
have ⟨t, hts, mem⟩ := Submodule.mem_span_finite_of_mem_span ((eq_top_iff_one _).mp hs)
refine top_unique ((span_pow_eq_top _ ((eq_top_iff_one _).mpr mem) <|
t.attach.sup fun x ↦ n ⟨x, hts x.2⟩).ge.trans <| span_le.mpr ?_)
rintro _ ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Finset.le_sup <| t.mem_attach ⟨x, hxt⟩)]
simp_rw [pow_add]
exact mul_mem_left _ _ (subset_span ⟨_, rfl⟩)
theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Finset ι}
(I : Ideal α) {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hfi : f i ∈ I) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ∈ I := by
classical
rw [Finset.prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul hi]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hfi
end Ideal
end CommSemiring
section DivisionSemiring
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionSemiring K] (I : Ideal K)
namespace Ideal
variable (K) in
/-- A bijection between (left) ideals of a division ring and `{0, 1}`, sending `⊥` to `0`
and `⊤` to `1`. -/
def equivFinTwo [DecidableEq (Ideal K)] : Ideal K ≃ Fin 2 where
toFun := fun I ↦ if I = ⊥ then 0 else 1
invFun := ![⊥, ⊤]
left_inv := fun I ↦ by rcases eq_bot_or_top I with rfl | rfl <;> simp
right_inv := fun i ↦ by fin_cases i <;> simp
instance : Finite (Ideal K) := let _i := Classical.decEq (Ideal K); ⟨equivFinTwo K⟩
/-- Ideals of a `DivisionSemiring` are a simple order. Thanks to the way abbreviations work,
this automatically gives an `IsSimpleModule K` instance. -/
instance isSimpleOrder : IsSimpleOrder (Ideal K) :=
⟨eq_bot_or_top⟩
end Ideal
end DivisionSemiring
-- TODO: consider moving the lemmas below out of the `Ring` namespace since they are
-- about `CommSemiring`s.
namespace Ring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
theorem exists_not_isUnit_of_not_isField [Nontrivial R] (hf : ¬IsField R) :
∃ (x : R) (_hx : x ≠ (0 : R)), ¬IsUnit x := by
have : ¬_ := fun h => hf ⟨exists_pair_ne R, mul_comm, h⟩
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_exists_inv]
push_neg at this ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩ := this
exact ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩
theorem not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top [Nontrivial R] :
¬IsField R ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, ⊥ < I ∧ I < ⊤ := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨x, nz, nu⟩ := exists_not_isUnit_of_not_isField h
use Ideal.span {x}
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
exact ⟨mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp nz, mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.mp nu⟩
· rintro ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩ hf
obtain ⟨x, mem, ne_zero⟩ := SetLike.exists_of_lt bot_lt
rw [Submodule.mem_bot] at ne_zero
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf.mul_inv_cancel ne_zero
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, ← hy] at lt_top
exact lt_top (I.mul_mem_right _ mem)
theorem not_isField_iff_exists_prime [Nontrivial R] :
¬IsField R ↔ ∃ p : Ideal R, p ≠ ⊥ ∧ p.IsPrime :=
not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.trans
⟨fun ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hp, le_p⟩ := I.exists_le_maximal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp lt_top)
⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mp (lt_of_lt_of_le bot_lt le_p), hp.isPrime⟩,
fun ⟨p, ne_bot, Prime⟩ => ⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr Prime.1⟩⟩
/-- Also see `Ideal.isSimpleOrder` for the forward direction as an instance when `R` is a
division (semi)ring.
This result actually holds for all division semirings, but we lack the predicate to state it. -/
theorem isField_iff_isSimpleOrder_ideal : IsField R ↔ IsSimpleOrder (Ideal R) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· exact
⟨fun h => (not_isField_of_subsingleton _ h).elim, fun h =>
(false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton <| Ideal R).elim⟩
rw [← not_iff_not, Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top, ← not_iff_not]
push_neg
simp_rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, ← or_iff_not_imp_left, not_ne_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.2⟩
/-- When a ring is not a field, the maximal ideals are nontrivial. -/
theorem ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField [Nontrivial R] {M : Ideal R} (max : M.IsMaximal)
(not_field : ¬IsField R) : M ≠ ⊥ := by
rintro h
rw [h] at max
rcases max with ⟨⟨_h1, h2⟩⟩
obtain ⟨I, hIbot, hItop⟩ := not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.mp not_field
exact ne_of_lt hItop (h2 I hIbot)
end Ring
namespace Ideal
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R]
theorem bot_lt_of_maximal (M : Ideal R) [hm : M.IsMaximal] (non_field : ¬IsField R) : ⊥ < M := by
rcases Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.1 non_field with ⟨I, Ibot, Itop⟩
constructor; · simp
intro mle
apply lt_irrefl (⊤ : Ideal R)
have : M = ⊥ := eq_bot_iff.mpr mle
rw [← this] at Ibot
rwa [hm.1.2 I Ibot] at Itop
end Ideal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Basic.lean | 586 | 601 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials over a ring
Many results about polynomials hold when the coefficient ring is a commutative semiring.
Some stronger results can be derived when we assume this semiring is a ring.
This file does not define any new operations, but proves some of these stronger results.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommRing R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
instance instCommRingMvPolynomial : CommRing (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable (σ a a')
@[simp]
theorem C_sub : (C (a - a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a - C a' :=
RingHom.map_sub _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_neg : (C (-a) : MvPolynomial σ R) = -C a :=
RingHom.map_neg _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_neg (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (-p) = -coeff m p :=
Finsupp.neg_apply _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sub (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p - q) = coeff m p - coeff m q :=
Finsupp.sub_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem support_neg : (-p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_neg p
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p - q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_sub
variable {σ} (p)
section Degrees
@[simp]
theorem degrees_neg (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (-p).degrees = p.degrees := by
rw [degrees, support_neg]; rfl
theorem degrees_sub_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p - q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ∪ q.degrees := by
simpa [degrees_def] using AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_sub_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sub := degrees_sub_le
| end Degrees
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/CommRing.lean | 96 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
| local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 75 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Bhavik Mehta, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sections
/-! # Lemmas about `Multiset.sum` and `Multiset.prod` requiring extra algebra imports -/
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α]
@[simp] lemma prod_map_neg (s : Multiset α) : (s.map Neg.neg).prod = (-1) ^ card s * s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by simp)
end CommMonoid
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α] {s : Multiset α}
lemma prod_eq_zero (h : (0 : α) ∈ s) : s.prod = 0 := by
rcases Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem h with ⟨s', hs'⟩; simp [hs', Multiset.prod_cons]
variable [NoZeroDivisors α] [Nontrivial α] {s : Multiset α}
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_zero_iff : s.prod = 0 ↔ (0 : α) ∈ s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ by rw [quot_mk_to_coe, prod_coe]; exact List.prod_eq_zero_iff
lemma prod_ne_zero (h : (0 : α) ∉ s) : s.prod ≠ 0 := mt prod_eq_zero_iff.1 h
end CommMonoidWithZero
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] {a : α} {s : Multiset ι} {f : ι → α}
lemma sum_map_mul_left : sum (s.map fun i ↦ a * f i) = a * sum (s.map f) :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s ih => by simp [ih, mul_add]
lemma sum_map_mul_right : sum (s.map fun i ↦ f i * a) = sum (s.map f) * a :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun a s ih => by simp [ih, add_mul]
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
variable [NonUnitalSemiring α] {s : Multiset α} {a : α}
lemma dvd_sum : (∀ x ∈ s, a ∣ x) → a ∣ s.sum :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ ↦ dvd_zero _) fun x s ih h ↦ by
rw [sum_cons]
exact dvd_add (h _ (mem_cons_self _ _)) (ih fun y hy ↦ h _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr hy)
end NonUnitalSemiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring α]
lemma prod_map_sum {s : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
prod (s.map sum) = sum ((Sections s).map prod) :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) fun a s ih ↦ by
simp [ih, map_bind, sum_map_mul_left, sum_map_mul_right]
lemma prod_map_add {s : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α} :
prod (s.map fun i ↦ f i + g i) =
sum ((antidiagonal s).map fun p ↦ (p.1.map f).prod * (p.2.map g).prod) := by
refine s.induction_on ?_ fun a s ih ↦ ?_
· simp only [map_zero, prod_zero, antidiagonal_zero, map_singleton, mul_one, sum_singleton]
· simp only [map_cons, prod_cons, ih, sum_map_mul_left.symm, add_mul, mul_left_comm (f a),
mul_left_comm (g a), sum_map_add, antidiagonal_cons, Prod.map_fst, Prod.map_snd,
id_eq, map_add, map_map, Function.comp_apply, mul_assoc, sum_add]
exact add_comm _ _
end CommSemiring
end Multiset
open Multiset
namespace Commute
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (s : Multiset α)
theorem multiset_sum_right (a : α) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, Commute a b) : Commute a s.sum := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
rw [quot_mk_to_coe, sum_coe]
exact Commute.list_sum_right _ _ h
theorem multiset_sum_left (b : α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, Commute a b) : Commute s.sum b :=
((Commute.multiset_sum_right _ _) fun _ ha => (h _ ha).symm).symm
end Commute
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Ring/Multiset.lean | 99 | 102 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
theorem rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| a :: l, 0, m => by simp
| [], n, m => by simp
| a :: l, n + 1, m => by
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate' _ n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← rotate'_cons_succ,
Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length (l : List α) : rotate' l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate'_eq_drop_append_take le_rfl]; simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length_mul (l : List α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length := by
simp [-rotate'_length, Nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
_ = l := by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul l n]
theorem rotate'_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc
l.rotate' (n % l.length) =
(l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate' ((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) :=
by rw [rotate'_length_mul]
_ = l.rotate' n := by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp_all [length_eq_zero_iff]
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod,
rotate'_eq_drop_append_take (le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))]
simp [rotate]
@[simp] theorem rotate_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate (n + 1) = (l ++ [a]).rotate n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rotate : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [], _, n => by simp
| a :: l, _, 0 => by simp
| a :: l, _, n + 1 => by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or_comm]
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_replicate (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : (replicate n a).rotate k = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate_iff.2 ⟨by rw [length_rotate, length_replicate], fun b hb =>
eq_of_mem_replicate <| mem_rotate.1 hb⟩
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ l.length → l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']; exact rotate'_eq_drop_append_take
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l.drop (n % l.length) ++ l.take (n % l.length) := by
rcases l.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· simp [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm]
rw [← rotate_eq_drop_append_take (n.mod_lt hl).le, rotate_mod]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_append_length_eq (l l' : List α) : (l ++ l').rotate l.length = l' ++ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction l generalizing l'
· simp
· simp_all [rotate']
theorem rotate_rotate (l : List α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length (l : List α) : rotate l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length_mul (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
theorem rotate_perm (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate'_cons_succ]
exact (hn _).trans (perm_append_singleton _ _)
@[simp]
theorem nodup_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : Nodup (l.rotate n) ↔ Nodup l :=
(rotate_perm l n).nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [rotate_cons_succ, hn]
theorem nil_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : [] = l.rotate n ↔ [] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : [x].rotate n = [x] :=
rotate_replicate x 1 n
theorem zipWith_rotate_distrib {β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) (l' : List β) (n : ℕ)
(h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zipWith f l l').rotate n = zipWith f (l.rotate n) (l'.rotate n) := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod,
rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, h, zipWith_append, ← drop_zipWith, ←
take_zipWith, List.length_zipWith, h, min_self]
rw [length_drop, length_drop, h]
theorem zipWith_rotate_one {β : Type*} (f : α → α → β) (x y : α) (l : List α) :
zipWith f (x :: y :: l) ((x :: y :: l).rotate 1) = f x y :: zipWith f (y :: l) (l ++ [x]) := by
simp
theorem getElem?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n)[m]? = l[(m + n) % l.length]? := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod]
rcases lt_or_le m (l.drop (n % l.length)).length with hm | hm
· rw [getElem?_append_left hm, getElem?_drop, ← add_mod_mod]
rw [length_drop, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hm
rw [mod_eq_of_lt hm, Nat.add_comm]
· have hlt : n % length l < length l := mod_lt _ (m.zero_le.trans_lt hml)
rw [getElem?_append_right hm, getElem?_take_of_lt, length_drop]
· congr 1
rw [length_drop] at hm
have hm' := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 hm
have : n % length l + m - length l < length l := by
rw [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add hm']
exact Nat.add_lt_add hlt hml
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm m, ← mod_add_mod, mod_eq_sub_mod hm', mod_eq_of_lt this]
omega
· rwa [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add' hm, length_drop, Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le]
theorem getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (h : k < (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n)[k] =
l[(k + n) % l.length]'(mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_rotate]
exact h.trans_eq (length_rotate _ _)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated getElem?_rotate (since := "2025-02-14")]
theorem get?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n).get? m = l.get? ((m + n) % l.length) := by
simp only [get?_eq_getElem?, length_rotate, hml, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_rotate]
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
theorem get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n).get k = l.get ⟨(k + n) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.pos)⟩ := by
simp [getElem_rotate]
theorem head?_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) : head? (l.rotate n) = l[n]? := by
rw [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_rotate (n.zero_le.trans_lt h), Nat.zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem get_rotate_one (l : List α) (k : Fin (l.rotate 1).length) :
(l.rotate 1).get k = l.get ⟨(k + 1) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l 1 ▸ k.pos)⟩ :=
get_rotate l 1 k
/-- A version of `List.getElem_rotate` that represents `l[k]` in terms of
`(List.rotate l n)[⋯]`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.getElem_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem getElem_eq_getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (hk : k < l.length) :
l[k] = ((l.rotate n)[(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length]'
((Nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm)) := by
rw [getElem_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [hk, (mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).le]
/-- A version of `List.get_rotate` that represents `List.get l` in terms of
`List.get (List.rotate l n)`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.get_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem get_eq_get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin l.length) :
l.get k = (l.rotate n).get ⟨(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length,
(Nat.mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm⟩ := by
rw [get_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [k.2, (mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).le]
theorem rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [hα : Nonempty α] :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = replicate l.length a
| [] => by simp
| a :: l => ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ext_getElem length_replicate.symm fun n h₁ h₂ => by
rw [getElem_replicate, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← head?_rotate h₁, h,
head?_cons]⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ n => by rw [hb, rotate_replicate]⟩
theorem rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [Nonempty α] {l : List α} :
l.rotate 1 = l ↔ ∃ a : α, l = List.replicate l.length a :=
⟨fun h =>
rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp fun n =>
Nat.rec l.rotate_zero (fun n hn => by rwa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← l.rotate_rotate, hn]) n,
fun h => rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mpr h 1⟩
theorem rotate_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun l : List α => l.rotate n := by
rintro l l' (h : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n)
have hle : l.length = l'.length := (l.length_rotate n).symm.trans (h.symm ▸ l'.length_rotate n)
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod] at h
obtain ⟨hd, ht⟩ := append_inj h (by simp_all)
rw [← take_append_drop _ l, ht, hd, take_append_drop]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n ↔ l = l' :=
(rotate_injective n).eq_iff
theorem rotate_eq_iff {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l' ↔ l = l'.rotate (l'.length - n % l'.length) := by
rw [← @rotate_eq_rotate _ l _ n, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod l', add_mod]
rcases l'.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm, rotate_nil]
· rcases (Nat.zero_le (n % l'.length)).eq_or_lt with hn | hn
· simp [← hn]
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt hl hn), Nat.sub_add_cancel, mod_self, rotate_zero]
exact (Nat.mod_lt _ hl).le
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_singleton_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : l.rotate n = [x] ↔ l = [x] := by
rw [rotate_eq_iff, rotate_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : [x] = l.rotate n ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem reverse_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
(l.rotate n).reverse = l.reverse.rotate (l.length - n % l.length) := by
rw [← length_reverse, ← rotate_eq_iff]
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate_cons_succ, ← rotate_rotate, hn]
simp
theorem rotate_reverse (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
l.reverse.rotate n = (l.rotate (l.length - n % l.length)).reverse := by
rw [← reverse_reverse l]
simp_rw [reverse_rotate, reverse_reverse, rotate_eq_iff, rotate_rotate, length_rotate,
length_reverse]
rw [← length_reverse]
let k := n % l.reverse.length
rcases hk' : k with - | k'
· simp_all! [k, length_reverse, ← rotate_rotate]
· rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· simp
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.sub_add_cancel, rotate_length]
· exact Nat.sub_le _ _
· exact Nat.sub_lt (by simp) (by simp_all! [k])
theorem map_rotate {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
map f (l.rotate n) = (map f l).rotate n := by
induction' n with n hn IH generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [hn]
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (hn : l ≠ []) (i j : ℕ)
(h : l.rotate i = l.rotate j) : i % l.length = j % l.length := by
rw [← rotate_mod l i, ← rotate_mod l j] at h
simpa only [head?_rotate, mod_lt, length_pos_of_ne_nil hn, getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj,
hl.getElem_inj_iff, Fin.ext_iff] using congr_arg head? h
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {i j : ℕ} :
l.rotate i = l.rotate j ↔ i % l.length = j % l.length ∨ l = [] := by
rcases eq_or_ne l [] with rfl | hn
· simp
· simp only [hn, or_false]
refine ⟨hl.rotate_congr hn _ _, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← rotate_mod, h, rotate_mod]
theorem Nodup.rotate_eq_self_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l ↔ n % l.length = 0 ∨ l = [] := by
rw [← zero_mod, ← hl.rotate_congr_iff, rotate_zero]
section IsRotated
variable (l l' : List α)
/-- `IsRotated l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~r l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are cyclic permutations
of each other. This is defined by claiming that `∃ n, l.rotate n = l'`. -/
def IsRotated : Prop :=
∃ n, l.rotate n = l'
@[inherit_doc List.IsRotated]
-- This matches the precedence of the infix `~` for `List.Perm`, and of other relation infixes
infixr:50 " ~r " => IsRotated
variable {l l'}
@[refl]
theorem IsRotated.refl (l : List α) : l ~r l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
@[symm]
theorem IsRotated.symm (h : l ~r l') : l' ~r l := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· exists 0
· use (hd :: tl).length * n - n
rw [rotate_rotate, Nat.add_sub_cancel', rotate_length_mul]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (by simp)
theorem isRotated_comm : l ~r l' ↔ l' ~r l :=
⟨IsRotated.symm, IsRotated.symm⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem IsRotated.forall (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~r l :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[trans]
theorem IsRotated.trans : ∀ {l l' l'' : List α}, l ~r l' → l' ~r l'' → l ~r l''
| _, _, _, ⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩ => ⟨n + m, by rw [rotate_rotate]⟩
theorem IsRotated.eqv : Equivalence (@IsRotated α) :=
Equivalence.mk IsRotated.refl IsRotated.symm IsRotated.trans
/-- The relation `List.IsRotated l l'` forms a `Setoid` of cycles. -/
def IsRotated.setoid (α : Type*) : Setoid (List α) where
r := IsRotated
iseqv := IsRotated.eqv
theorem IsRotated.perm (h : l ~r l') : l ~ l' :=
Exists.elim h fun _ hl => hl ▸ (rotate_perm _ _).symm
theorem IsRotated.nodup_iff (h : l ~r l') : Nodup l ↔ Nodup l' :=
h.perm.nodup_iff
theorem IsRotated.mem_iff (h : l ~r l') {a : α} : a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ l' :=
h.perm.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff : l ~r [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
| theorem isRotated_nil_iff' : [] ~r l ↔ [] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_nil_iff, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 412 | 414 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,229 | 1,231 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finsupp
/-!
# Rank of free modules
## Main result
- `LinearEquiv.nonempty_equiv_iff_lift_rank_eq`:
Two free modules are isomorphic iff they have the same dimension.
- `Module.finBasis`:
An arbitrary basis of a finite free module indexed by `Fin n` given `finrank R M = n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set Module
section Tower
variable (F : Type u) (K : Type v) (A : Type w)
variable [Semiring F] [Semiring K] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Module F K] [Module K A] [Module F A] [IsScalarTower F K A]
variable [StrongRankCondition F] [StrongRankCondition K] [Module.Free F K] [Module.Free K A]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$.
The universe polymorphic version of `rank_mul_rank` below. -/
theorem lift_rank_mul_lift_rank :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank F K) * Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank K A) =
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank F A) := by
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis F K
let c := Module.Free.chooseBasis K A
rw [← (Module.rank F K).lift_id, ← b.mk_eq_rank, ← (Module.rank K A).lift_id, ← c.mk_eq_rank,
← lift_umax.{w, v}, ← (b.smulTower c).mk_eq_rank, mk_prod, lift_mul, lift_lift, lift_lift,
lift_lift, lift_lift, lift_umax.{v, w}]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$.
This is a simpler version of `lift_rank_mul_lift_rank` with `K` and `A` in the same universe. -/
@[stacks 09G9]
theorem rank_mul_rank (A : Type v) [AddCommMonoid A]
[Module K A] [Module F A] [IsScalarTower F K A] [Module.Free K A] :
Module.rank F K * Module.rank K A = Module.rank F A := by
convert lift_rank_mul_lift_rank F K A <;> rw [lift_id]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$. -/
theorem Module.finrank_mul_finrank : finrank F K * finrank K A = finrank F A := by
simp_rw [finrank]
rw [← toNat_lift.{w} (Module.rank F K), ← toNat_lift.{v} (Module.rank K A), ← toNat_mul,
lift_rank_mul_lift_rank, toNat_lift]
end Tower
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
variable [Semiring R] [StrongRankCondition R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [Module.Free R M₁]
namespace Module.Free
variable (R M)
/-- The rank of a free module `M` over `R` is the cardinality of `ChooseBasisIndex R M`. -/
theorem rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex : Module.rank R M = #(ChooseBasisIndex R M) :=
(chooseBasis R M).mk_eq_rank''.symm
/-- The finrank of a free module `M` over `R` is the cardinality of `ChooseBasisIndex R M`. -/
theorem _root_.Module.finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex [Module.Finite R M] :
finrank R M = Fintype.card (ChooseBasisIndex R M) := by
simp [finrank, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
/-- The rank of a free module `M` over an infinite scalar ring `R` is the cardinality of `M`
whenever `#R < #M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_mk_of_infinite_lt [Infinite R] (h_lt : lift.{v} #R < lift.{u} #M) :
Module.rank R M = #M := by
have : Infinite M := infinite_iff.mpr <| lift_le.mp <| le_trans (by simp) h_lt.le
have h : lift #M = lift #(ChooseBasisIndex R M →₀ R) := lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(chooseBasis R M).repr⟩
simp only [mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite', lift_id', ← rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, lift_max,
lift_lift] at h
refine lift_inj.mp ((max_eq_iff.mp h.symm).resolve_right <| not_and_of_not_left _ ?_).left
exact (lift_umax.{v, u}.symm ▸ h_lt).ne
end Module.Free
open Module.Free
open Cardinal
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq
(cnd : Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M')) :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M') := by
obtain ⟨⟨α, B⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
obtain ⟨⟨β, B'⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M')
have : Cardinal.lift.{v', v} #α = Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} #β := by
rw [B.mk_eq_rank'', cnd, B'.mk_eq_rank'']
exact (Cardinal.lift_mk_eq.{v, v', 0}.1 this).map (B.equiv B')
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem nonempty_linearEquiv_of_rank_eq (cond : Module.rank R M = Module.rank R M₁) :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M₁) :=
nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq <| congr_arg _ cond
section
variable (M M' M₁)
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
def LinearEquiv.ofLiftRankEq
(cond : Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M')) :
M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
Classical.choice (nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq cond)
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
def LinearEquiv.ofRankEq (cond : Module.rank R M = Module.rank R M₁) : M ≃ₗ[R] M₁ :=
Classical.choice (nonempty_linearEquiv_of_rank_eq cond)
end
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if and only if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem LinearEquiv.nonempty_equiv_iff_lift_rank_eq : Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M') ↔
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => LinearEquiv.lift_rank_eq h, fun h => nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq h⟩
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if and only if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem LinearEquiv.nonempty_equiv_iff_rank_eq :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M₁) ↔ Module.rank R M = Module.rank R M₁ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => LinearEquiv.rank_eq h, fun h => nonempty_linearEquiv_of_rank_eq h⟩
/-- Two finite and free modules are isomorphic if they have the same (finite) rank. -/
theorem FiniteDimensional.nonempty_linearEquiv_of_finrank_eq
[Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M'] (cond : finrank R M = finrank R M') :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M') :=
nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq <| by simp only [← finrank_eq_rank, cond, lift_natCast]
/-- Two finite and free modules are isomorphic if and only if they have the same (finite) rank. -/
theorem FiniteDimensional.nonempty_linearEquiv_iff_finrank_eq [Module.Finite R M]
[Module.Finite R M'] : Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M') ↔ finrank R M = finrank R M' :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h.finrank_eq, fun h => nonempty_linearEquiv_of_finrank_eq h⟩
variable (M M')
/-- Two finite and free modules are isomorphic if they have the same (finite) rank. -/
noncomputable def LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M']
(cond : finrank R M = finrank R M') : M ≃ₗ[R] M' :=
Classical.choice <| FiniteDimensional.nonempty_linearEquiv_of_finrank_eq cond
variable {M M'}
namespace Module
/-- A free module of rank zero is trivial. -/
lemma subsingleton_of_rank_zero (h : Module.rank R M = 0) : Subsingleton M := by
rw [← Basis.mk_eq_rank'' (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M), Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact (Module.Free.repr R M).subsingleton
/-- See `rank_lt_aleph0` for the inverse direction without `Module.Free R M`. -/
lemma rank_lt_aleph0_iff : Module.rank R M < ℵ₀ ↔ Module.Finite R M := by
rw [Free.rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, mk_lt_aleph0_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Finite.of_basis (Free.chooseBasis R M),
fun I ↦ Finite.of_fintype (Free.ChooseBasisIndex R M)⟩
theorem finrank_of_not_finite (h : ¬Module.Finite R M) : finrank R M = 0 := by
rw [finrank, toNat_eq_zero, ← not_lt, Module.rank_lt_aleph0_iff]
exact .inr h
theorem finite_of_finrank_pos (h : 0 < finrank R M) : Module.Finite R M := by
contrapose h
simp [finrank_of_not_finite h]
theorem finite_of_finrank_eq_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank R M = n.succ) : Module.Finite R M :=
finite_of_finrank_pos <| by rw [hn]; exact n.succ_pos
theorem finite_iff_of_rank_eq_nsmul {W} [AddCommMonoid W] [Module R W] [Module.Free R W] {n : ℕ}
(hn : n ≠ 0) (hVW : Module.rank R M = n • Module.rank R W) :
Module.Finite R M ↔ Module.Finite R W := by
simp only [← rank_lt_aleph0_iff, hVW, nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero hn]
variable (R M)
/-- A finite rank free module has a basis indexed by `Fin (finrank R M)`. -/
noncomputable def finBasis [Module.Finite R M] :
Basis (Fin (finrank R M)) R M :=
(Module.Free.chooseBasis R M).reindex (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq
(finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M).symm)
/-- A rank `n` free module has a basis indexed by `Fin n`. -/
noncomputable def finBasisOfFinrankEq [Module.Finite R M] {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank R M = n) :
Basis (Fin n) R M := (finBasis R M).reindex (finCongr hn)
variable {R M}
/-- A free module with rank 1 has a basis with one element. -/
noncomputable def basisUnique (ι : Type*) [Unique ι]
(h : finrank R M = 1) :
Basis ι R M :=
haveI : Module.Finite R M :=
Module.finite_of_finrank_pos (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le h.symm.le)
(finBasisOfFinrankEq R M h).reindex (Equiv.ofUnique _ _)
@[simp]
theorem basisUnique_repr_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type*} [Unique ι]
{h : finrank R M = 1} {v : M} {i : ι} :
(basisUnique ι h).repr v i = 0 ↔ v = 0 :=
⟨fun hv =>
(basisUnique ι h).repr.map_eq_zero_iff.mp (Finsupp.ext fun j => Subsingleton.elim i j ▸ hv),
fun hv => by rw [hv, LinearEquiv.map_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply]⟩
end Module
namespace Algebra
instance (R S : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [StrongRankCondition R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
[IsQuadraticExtension R S] :
Module.Finite R S := finite_of_finrank_eq_succ <| IsQuadraticExtension.finrank_eq_two R S
end Algebra
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Free.lean | 235 | 240 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
| rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 508 | 511 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Frobenius
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Expand a polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.expand R p f`: expand the polynomial `f` with coefficients in a
commutative semiring `R` by a factor of p, so `expand R p (∑ aₙ xⁿ)` is `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
* `Polynomial.contract p f`: the opposite of `expand`, so it sends `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ` to `∑ aₙ xⁿ`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
/-- Expand the polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, map_smul, map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [map_mul, expand_C, map_pow, expand_X, map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [map_mul, expand_C, map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
/-- Expansion is injective. -/
theorem expand_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : Function.Injective (expand R n) := fun g g' H =>
ext fun k => by rw [← coeff_expand_mul hn, H, coeff_expand_mul hn]
theorem expand_inj {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f g : R[X]} : expand R p f = expand R p g ↔ f = g :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff
theorem expand_eq_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff' (map_zero _)
theorem expand_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
(expand_eq_zero hp).not
theorem expand_eq_C {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} {r : R} : expand R p f = C r ↔ f = C r := by
rw [← expand_C, expand_inj hp, expand_C]
theorem natDegree_expand (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : (expand R p f).natDegree = f.natDegree * p := by
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with hp | hp
· rw [hp, coe_expand, pow_zero, mul_zero, ← C_1, eval₂_hom, natDegree_C]
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, map_zero, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
have hf1 : expand R p f ≠ 0 := mt (expand_eq_zero hp).1 hf
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree hf1]
refine le_antisymm ((degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun n hn => ?_) ?_
· rw [coeff_expand hp]
split_ifs with hpn
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
contrapose! hn
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hpn]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right p hn
· rfl
· refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_expand_mul hp, ← leadingCoeff]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hf
theorem leadingCoeff_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) :
(expand R p f).leadingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
simp_rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_expand, coeff_expand_mul hp]
|
theorem monic_expand_iff {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) : (expand R p f).Monic ↔ f.Monic := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff_expand hp]
alias ⟨_, Monic.expand⟩ := monic_expand_iff
theorem map_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R →+* S} {q : R[X]} :
map f (expand R p q) = expand S p (map f q) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
ext
rw [coeff_map, coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp), coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp)]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem expand_eval (p : ℕ) (P : R[X]) (r : R) : eval r (expand R p P) = eval (r ^ p) P := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on P (fun a => by simp) (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n a _ => by simp
rw [map_add, eval_add, eval_add, hf, hg]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 153 | 172 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.MapDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Monoid algebras
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) where
algebraMap := singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
instance isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleOneAlgHom : A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleOneRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap k A)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom (k := k).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
-- The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v) :
V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
rw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
of_apply, h g v]
variable (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
end
end
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f :) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] where
algebraMap := singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
instance isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleZeroAlgHom : k →ₐ[R] k[G]) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleZeroRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k[G]) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom (R := R).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x.toAdd 1) :=
rfl
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
end lift
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two additive magmas, then `Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a
non-unital algebra homomorphism between their additive magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Add G] [Add H] [FunLike F G H] [AddHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₙₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G]
{H F : Type*} [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (AddMonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (AddMonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [AddMonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G₁] [AddMonoid G₂] [AddMonoid G₃] (f : G₁ →+ G₂) (g : G₂ →+ G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`AddMonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃+ H) : A[G] ≃ₐ[k] A[H] :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃+ H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (AddEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- The algebra equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative`. -/
def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicativeAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative k G with
commutes' := fun r => by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative] }
/-- The algebra equivalence between `MonoidAlgebra` and `AddMonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Additive`. -/
def MonoidAlgebra.toAdditiveAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [Monoid G] :
MonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] AddMonoidAlgebra k (Additive G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive k G with commutes' := fun r => by simp [MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive] }
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 1,943 | 1,944 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ImageToKernel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Exact sequences in abelian categories
In an abelian category, we get several interesting results related to exactness which are not
true in more general settings.
## Main results
* A short complex `S` is exact iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
* If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` has the universal property of the kernel of `g`.
* `f` is a monomorphism iff `kernel.ι f = 0` iff `Exact 0 f`, and `f` is an epimorphism iff
`cokernel.π = 0` iff `Exact f 0`.
* A faithful functor between abelian categories that preserves zero morphisms reflects exact
sequences.
* `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ 0` is exact if and only if the second map is a cokernel of the first, and
`0 ⟶ X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z` is exact if and only if the first map is a kernel of the second.
* A functor `F` such that for all `S`, we have `S.Exact → (S.map F).Exact` preserves both
finite limits and colimits.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace ShortComplex
variable (S : ShortComplex C)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel' : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift]
have : factorThruImage S.f ≫ imageToKernel' S.f S.g S.zero = kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (kernel.ι _), kernel.lift_ι, imageToKernel',
Category.assoc, image.fac]
constructor
· intro
exact epi_of_epi_fac this
· intro
rw [← this]
apply epi_comp
theorem exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ Epi (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel']
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (imageSubobjectIso S.f).symm (kernelSubobjectIso S.g).symm
theorem exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel : S.Exact ↔ IsIso (imageToKernel S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [S.exact_iff_epi_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
apply isIso_of_mono_of_epi
· intro
infer_instance
/-- In an abelian category, a short complex `S` is exact
iff `imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g`.
-/
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : S.Exact ↔ imageSubobject S.f = kernelSubobject S.g := by
rw [exact_iff_isIso_imageToKernel]
constructor
· intro
exact Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ S.zero)) (by simp)
· intro h
exact ⟨Subobject.ofLE _ _ h.ge, by ext; simp, by ext; simp⟩
theorem exact_iff_of_forks {cg : KernelFork S.g} (hg : IsLimit cg) {cf : CokernelCofork S.f}
(hf : IsColimit cf) : S.Exact ↔ cg.ι ≫ cf.π = 0 := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero]
let e₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg
let e₂ := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf
have : cg.ι ≫ cf.π = e₁.inv ≫ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f ≫ e₂.hom := by
have eq₁ := IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp (kernelIsKernel S.g) hg (.zero)
have eq₂ := IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom (cokernelIsCokernel S.f) hf (.one)
dsimp at eq₁ eq₂
rw [← eq₁, ← eq₂, Category.assoc]
rw [this, IsIso.comp_left_eq_zero e₁.inv, ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero _ e₂.hom]
variable {S}
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.image.ι S.f` is a kernel of `S.g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Abelian.image.ι S.f)
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
exact KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _
(fun u hu ↦ kernel.lift (cokernel.π S.f) u
(by rw [← kernel.lift_ι S.g u hu, Category.assoc, h, comp_zero])) (by simp)
(fun _ _ _ hm => by rw [← cancel_mono (Abelian.image.ι S.f), hm, kernel.lift_ι])
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` is a kernel of `g`. -/
def Exact.isLimitImage' (h : S.Exact) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (Limits.image.ι S.f)
(image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero) : KernelFork S.g) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _ h.isLimitImage (Abelian.imageIsoImage S.f).symm <| IsImage.lift_fac _ _
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `Abelian.coimage.π g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitCoimage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit
(CokernelCofork.ofπ (Abelian.coimage.π S.g) (Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero) :
CokernelCofork S.f) := by
rw [exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at h
refine CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _
(fun u hu => cokernel.desc (kernel.ι S.g) u
(by rw [← cokernel.π_desc S.f u hu, ← Category.assoc, h, zero_comp]))
(by simp) ?_
intros _ _ _ _ hm
ext
rw [hm, cokernel.π_desc]
/-- If `(f, g)` is exact, then `factorThruImage g` is a cokernel of `f`. -/
def Exact.isColimitImage (h : S.Exact) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.factorThruImage S.g)
(comp_factorThruImage_eq_zero S.zero)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _ h.isColimitCoimage (Abelian.coimageIsoImage' S.g) <|
(cancel_mono (Limits.image.ι S.g)).1 <| by simp
theorem exact_kernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk (kernel.ι f) f (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ (kernelIsKernel f)
theorem exact_cokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(ShortComplex.mk f (cokernel.π f) (by simp)).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ (cokernelIsCokernel f)
variable (S)
theorem exact_iff_exact_image_ι :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk (Abelian.image.ι S.f) S.g
(Abelian.image_ι_comp_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := Abelian.factorThruImage S.f
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := 𝟙 _ }
theorem exact_iff_exact_coimage_π :
S.Exact ↔ (ShortComplex.mk S.f (Abelian.coimage.π S.g)
(Abelian.comp_coimage_π_eq_zero S.zero)).Exact := by
symm
exact ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono
{ τ₁ := 𝟙 _
τ₂ := 𝟙 _
τ₃ := Abelian.factorThruCoimage S.g }
end ShortComplex
section
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Mono f, kernel.ι f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk (0 : Z ⟶ X) f zero_comp).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := mono_of_kernel_ι_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_mono f, kernel.condition, zero_comp]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_mono _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
open List in
theorem Abelian.tfae_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
TFAE [Epi f, cokernel.π f = 0, (ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).Exact] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1 := epi_of_cokernel_π_eq_zero _
tfae_have 1 → 2
| _ => by rw [← cancel_epi f, cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 1 := ShortComplex.exact_iff_epi _ (by simp)
tfae_finish
end
namespace Functor
section
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [Abelian D]
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
lemma reflects_exact_of_faithful [F.Faithful] (S : ShortComplex C) (hS : (S.map F).Exact) :
S.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero] at hS ⊢
dsimp at hS
apply F.zero_of_map_zero
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ :=
kernel.lift' (F.map S.g) (F.map (kernel.ι S.g))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, kernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
cokernel.desc' (F.map S.f) (F.map (cokernel.π S.f))
(by simp only [← F.map_comp, cokernel.condition, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_zero])
rw [F.map_comp, ← hl, ← hk, Category.assoc, reassoc_of% hS, zero_comp, comp_zero]
end
end Functor
namespace Functor
open Limits Abelian
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B]
variable [Abelian A] [Abelian B]
variable (L : A ⥤ B)
section
variable [L.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
variable (hL : ∀ (S : ShortComplex A), S.Exact → (S.map L).Exact)
include hL
open ZeroObject
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves monomorphisms. -/
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesMonomorphisms where
preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_mono (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_mono f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
exact ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
/-- A functor which preserves exactness preserves epimorphisms. -/
theorem preservesEpimorphisms_of_map_exact : L.PreservesEpimorphisms where
| preserves f hf := by
apply ((Abelian.tfae_epi (L.map f) (L.obj 0)).out 2 0).mp
refine ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ?_ (hL _ (((tfae_epi f 0).out 0 2).mp hf))
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 238 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
theorem WSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SSameSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sSameSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.wSameSide.trans_sSameSide hyz, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem SSameSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.wSameSide.trans_wOppSide hyz hxy.2.2
theorem SSameSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem WOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_wOppSide hxy.symm hy).symm
theorem WOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
hxy.trans_wSameSide hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem WOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
rw [← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev] at hyz
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h ▸ hp₂)
theorem WOppSide.trans_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
hxy.trans hyz.1 hyz.2.1
theorem SOppSide.trans_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) : s.WOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SSameSide y z) : s.SOppSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.WOppSide y z) : s.WSameSide x z :=
(hyz.symm.trans_sOppSide hxy.symm).symm
theorem SOppSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.SOppSide x y)
(hyz : s.SOppSide y z) : s.SSameSide x z :=
⟨hxy.trans_wOppSide hyz.1, hxy.2.1, hyz.2.2⟩
theorem wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WSameSide x y ∧ s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ y ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ho⟩
rw [wOppSide_comm] at ho
by_contra h
rw [not_or] at h
exact h.1 (wOppSide_self_iff.1 (hs.trans_wOppSide ho h.2))
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_left_mem y h, wOppSide_of_left_mem y h⟩
· exact ⟨wSameSide_of_right_mem x h, wOppSide_of_right_mem x h⟩
theorem WSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h, ho.1⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact ho.2.1 hx
· exact ho.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.WOppSide x y := by
intro ho
have hxy := wSameSide_and_wOppSide_iff.1 ⟨h.1, ho⟩
rcases hxy with (hx | hy)
· exact h.2.1 hx
· exact h.2.2 hy
theorem SSameSide.not_sOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
¬s.SOppSide x y :=
fun ho => h.not_wOppSide ho.1
theorem WOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_wOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.WSameSide x y :=
fun hs => hs.not_sOppSide h
theorem SOppSide.not_sSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
¬s.SSameSide x y :=
fun hs => h.not_wSameSide hs.1
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, Wbtw R x p y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨p, hp, h⟩ => h.wOppSide₁₃ hp⟩
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h]
exact ⟨p₁, hp₁, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [← h]
exact ⟨p₂, hp₂, wbtw_self_right _ _ _⟩
· refine ⟨lineMap x y (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)), ?_, ?_⟩
· have : (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (y -ᵥ p₂ + (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) - (x -ᵥ p₁)) + (x -ᵥ p₁) =
(r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ y]
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) (r₁ + r₂)⁻¹ • h
rw [lineMap_apply, ← vsub_vadd x p₁, ← vsub_vadd y p₂, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc,
← vadd_assoc, vadd_eq_add, this]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem (r₂ / (r₁ + r₂)) hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _
⟨by positivity,
div_le_one_of_le₀ (le_add_of_nonneg_left hr₁.le) (Left.add_pos hr₁ hr₂).le⟩
theorem SOppSide.exists_sbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
∃ p ∈ s, Sbtw R x p y := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hw⟩ := wOppSide_iff_exists_wbtw.1 h.wOppSide
refine ⟨p, hp, hw, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.1 hp
· rintro rfl
exact h.2.2 hp
theorem _root_.Sbtw.sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P}
(h : Sbtw R x y z) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : s.SOppSide x z := by
refine ⟨h.wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ hy, hx, fun hz => hx ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rw [lineMap_apply] at hy
have ht : t ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
simp [lineMap_apply] at hyz
have hy' := vsub_mem_direction hy hz
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, ← neg_one_smul R (z -ᵥ x), ← add_smul,
← sub_eq_add_neg, s.direction.smul_mem_iff (sub_ne_zero_of_ne ht)] at hy'
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy')] at hy
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne.symm,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 < t) : s.SSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sSameSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht.le, fun h => hx ?_, hx⟩
rwa [vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ hp₂, s.direction.smul_mem_iff ht.ne,
vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp₁] at h
theorem sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p₁ p₂ : P} (hx : x ∉ s)
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hx hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left hy hx hx ht
theorem sOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) {t : R}
(ht : t < 0) : s.SOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(sOppSide_lineMap_left hx hy ht).symm
theorem setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ici 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ici]
constructor
· rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, (div_pos hr₁ hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sSameSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SSameSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Ioi 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Ioi]
constructor
· rw [sSameSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, div_pos hr₁ hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, h, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_wOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.WOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iic 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iic]
constructor
· rw [wOppSide_iff_exists_left hp, or_iff_right hx]
rintro ⟨p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
refine ⟨0, le_rfl, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp [h]
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, (div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂).le, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right x hp hp' ht
theorem setOf_sOppSide_eq_image2 {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x p : P} (hx : x ∉ s) (hp : p ∈ s) :
{ y | s.SOppSide x y } = Set.image2 (fun (t : R) q => t • (x -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) (Set.Iio 0) s := by
ext y
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_image2, Set.mem_Iio]
constructor
· rw [sOppSide_iff_exists_left hp]
rintro ⟨-, hy, p₂, hp₂, h | h | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, h⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hx (h.symm ▸ hp))
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact False.elim (hy (h ▸ hp₂))
· refine ⟨-r₁ / r₂, div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr₁) hr₂, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← smul_smul, neg_smul, h, smul_neg, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr₂.ne.symm, one_smul, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, vsub_vadd]
· rintro ⟨t, ht, p', hp', rfl⟩
exact sOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right hx hp hp' ht
theorem wOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) :=
(wbtw_pointReflection R _ _).wOppSide₁₃ hx
theorem sOppSide_pointReflection {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) :
s.SOppSide y (pointReflection R x y) := by
refine (sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne R fun h => hy ?_).sOppSide_of_not_mem_of_mem hy hx
rwa [← h]
end LinearOrderedField
section Normed
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [PseudoMetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
theorem isConnected_setOf_wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (x : P) (h : (s : Set P).Nonempty) :
IsConnected { y | s.WSameSide x y } := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := h
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨p, hp⟩⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [wSameSide_of_left_mem, hx]
have := AddTorsor.connectedSpace V P
| exact isConnected_univ
· rw [setOf_wSameSide_eq_image2 hx hp, ← Set.image_prod]
refine (isConnected_Ici.prod (isConnected_iff_connectedSpace.2 ?_)).image _
((continuous_fst.smul continuous_const).vadd continuous_snd).continuousOn
convert AddTorsor.connectedSpace s.direction s
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 744 | 748 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky, Anthony DeRossi
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Properties of `List.reduceOption`
In this file we prove basic lemmas about `List.reduceOption`.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem reduceOption_cons_of_some (x : α) (l : List (Option α)) :
reduceOption (some x :: l) = x :: l.reduceOption := by
simp only [reduceOption, filterMap, id, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
@[simp]
theorem reduceOption_cons_of_none (l : List (Option α)) :
reduceOption (none :: l) = l.reduceOption := by simp only [reduceOption, filterMap, id]
@[simp]
theorem reduceOption_nil : @reduceOption α [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reduceOption_map {l : List (Option α)} {f : α → β} :
reduceOption (map (Option.map f) l) = map f (reduceOption l) := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp only [reduceOption_nil, map_nil]
· cases hd <;>
simpa [Option.map_some', map, eq_self_iff_true, reduceOption_cons_of_some] using hl
theorem reduceOption_append (l l' : List (Option α)) :
(l ++ l').reduceOption = l.reduceOption ++ l'.reduceOption :=
filterMap_append
@[simp]
theorem reduceOption_replicate_none {n : ℕ} : (replicate n (@none α)).reduceOption = [] := by
dsimp [reduceOption]
rw [filterMap_replicate_of_none (id_def _)]
theorem reduceOption_eq_nil_iff (l : List (Option α)) :
l.reduceOption = [] ↔ ∃ n, l = replicate n none := by
dsimp [reduceOption]
rw [filterMap_eq_nil_iff]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨l.length, eq_replicate_of_mem h⟩
· intro ⟨_, h⟩
simp_rw [h, mem_replicate]
tauto
| theorem reduceOption_eq_singleton_iff (l : List (Option α)) (a : α) :
l.reduceOption = [a] ↔ ∃ m n, l = replicate m none ++ some a :: replicate n none := by
dsimp [reduceOption]
| Mathlib/Data/List/ReduceOption.lean | 59 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Johan Commelin, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Yoneda
/-!
# Adjunctions between functors
`F ⊣ G` represents the data of an adjunction between two functors
`F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C`. `F` is the left adjoint and `G` is the right adjoint.
We provide various useful constructors:
* `mkOfHomEquiv`
* `mk'`: construct an adjunction from the data of a hom set equivalence, unit and counit natural
transformations together with proofs of the equalities `homEquiv_unit` and `homEquiv_counit`
relating them to each other.
* `leftAdjointOfEquiv` / `rightAdjointOfEquiv`
construct a left/right adjoint of a given functor given the action on objects and
the relevant equivalence of morphism spaces.
* `adjunctionOfEquivLeft` / `adjunctionOfEquivRight` witness that these constructions
give adjunctions.
There are also typeclasses `IsLeftAdjoint` / `IsRightAdjoint`, which asserts the
existence of a adjoint functor. Given `[F.IsLeftAdjoint]`, a chosen right
adjoint can be obtained as `F.rightAdjoint`.
`Adjunction.comp` composes adjunctions.
`toEquivalence` upgrades an adjunction to an equivalence,
given witnesses that the unit and counit are pointwise isomorphisms.
Conversely `Equivalence.toAdjunction` recovers the underlying adjunction from an equivalence.
## Overview of the directory `CategoryTheory.Adjunction`
* Adjoint lifting theorems are in the directory `Lifting`.
* The file `AdjointFunctorTheorems` proves the adjoint functor theorems.
* The file `Comma` shows that for a functor `G : D ⥤ C` the data of an initial object in each
`StructuredArrow` category on `G` is equivalent to a left adjoint to `G`, as well as the dual.
* The file `Evaluation` shows that products and coproducts are adjoint to evaluation of functors.
* The file `FullyFaithful` characterizes when adjoints are full or faithful in terms of the unit
and counit.
* The file `Limits` proves that left adjoints preserve colimits and right adjoints preserve limits.
* The file `Mates` establishes the bijection between the 2-cells
```
L₁ R₁
C --→ D C ←-- D
G ↓ ↗ ↓ H G ↓ ↘ ↓ H
E --→ F E ←-- F
L₂ R₂
```
where `L₁ ⊣ R₁` and `L₂ ⊣ R₂`. Specializing to a pair of adjoints `L₁ L₂ : C ⥤ D`,
`R₁ R₂ : D ⥤ C`, it provides equivalences `(L₂ ⟶ L₁) ≃ (R₁ ⟶ R₂)` and `(L₂ ≅ L₁) ≃ (R₁ ≅ R₂)`.
* The file `Opposites` contains constructions to relate adjunctions of functors to adjunctions of
their opposites.
* The file `Reflective` defines reflective functors, i.e. fully faithful right adjoints. Note that
many facts about reflective functors are proved in the earlier file `FullyFaithful`.
* The file `Restrict` defines the restriction of an adjunction along fully faithful functors.
* The file `Triple` proves that in an adjoint triple, the left adjoint is fully faithful if and
only if the right adjoint is.
* The file `Unique` proves uniqueness of adjoints.
* The file `Whiskering` proves that functors `F : D ⥤ E` and `G : E ⥤ D` with an adjunction
`F ⊣ G`, induce adjunctions between the functor categories `C ⥤ D` and `C ⥤ E`,
and the functor categories `E ⥤ C` and `D ⥤ C`.
## Other files related to adjunctions
* The file `CategoryTheory.Monad.Adjunction` develops the basic relationship between adjunctions
and (co)monads. There it is also shown that given an adjunction `L ⊣ R` and an isomorphism
`L ⋙ R ≅ 𝟭 C`, the unit is an isomorphism, and similarly for the counit.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- `F ⊣ G` represents the data of an adjunction between two functors
`F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C`. `F` is the left adjoint and `G` is the right adjoint.
We use the unit-counit definition of an adjunction. There is a constructor `Adjunction.mk'`
which constructs an adjunction from the data of a hom set equivalence, a unit, and a counit,
together with proofs of the equalities `homEquiv_unit` and `homEquiv_counit` relating them to each
other.
There is also a constructor `Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv` which constructs an adjunction from a natural
hom set equivalence.
To construct adjoints to a given functor, there are constructors `leftAdjointOfEquiv` and
`adjunctionOfEquivLeft` (as well as their duals). -/
@[stacks 0037]
structure Adjunction (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) where
/-- The unit of an adjunction -/
unit : 𝟭 C ⟶ F.comp G
/-- The counit of an adjunction -/
counit : G.comp F ⟶ 𝟭 D
/-- Equality of the composition of the unit and counit with the identity `F ⟶ FGF ⟶ F = 𝟙` -/
left_triangle_components (X : C) :
F.map (unit.app X) ≫ counit.app (F.obj X) = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := by aesop_cat
/-- Equality of the composition of the unit and counit with the identity `G ⟶ GFG ⟶ G = 𝟙` -/
right_triangle_components (Y : D) :
unit.app (G.obj Y) ≫ G.map (counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (G.obj Y) := by aesop_cat
/-- The notation `F ⊣ G` stands for `Adjunction F G` representing that `F` is left adjoint to `G` -/
infixl:15 " ⊣ " => Adjunction
namespace Functor
/-- A class asserting the existence of a right adjoint. -/
class IsLeftAdjoint (left : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
exists_rightAdjoint : ∃ (right : D ⥤ C), Nonempty (left ⊣ right)
/-- A class asserting the existence of a left adjoint. -/
class IsRightAdjoint (right : D ⥤ C) : Prop where
exists_leftAdjoint : ∃ (left : C ⥤ D), Nonempty (left ⊣ right)
/-- A chosen left adjoint to a functor that is a right adjoint. -/
noncomputable def leftAdjoint (R : D ⥤ C) [IsRightAdjoint R] : C ⥤ D :=
(IsRightAdjoint.exists_leftAdjoint (right := R)).choose
/-- A chosen right adjoint to a functor that is a left adjoint. -/
noncomputable def rightAdjoint (L : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint L] : D ⥤ C :=
(IsLeftAdjoint.exists_rightAdjoint (left := L)).choose
end Functor
/-- The adjunction associated to a functor known to be a left adjoint. -/
noncomputable def Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint (left : C ⥤ D) [left.IsLeftAdjoint] :
left ⊣ left.rightAdjoint :=
Functor.IsLeftAdjoint.exists_rightAdjoint.choose_spec.some
/-- The adjunction associated to a functor known to be a right adjoint. -/
noncomputable def Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint (right : C ⥤ D) [right.IsRightAdjoint] :
right.leftAdjoint ⊣ right :=
Functor.IsRightAdjoint.exists_leftAdjoint.choose_spec.some
namespace Adjunction
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] left_triangle_components right_triangle_components
/-- The hom set equivalence associated to an adjunction. -/
@[simps -isSimp]
def homEquiv {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G) (X : C) (Y : D) :
(F.obj X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X ⟶ G.obj Y) where
toFun := fun f => adj.unit.app X ≫ G.map f
invFun := fun g => F.map g ≫ adj.counit.app Y
left_inv := fun f => by
dsimp
rw [F.map_comp, assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, adj.counit.naturality, ← assoc]
simp
right_inv := fun g => by
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Functor.map_comp]
rw [← assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, ← adj.unit.naturality]
simp
alias homEquiv_unit := homEquiv_apply
alias homEquiv_counit := homEquiv_symm_apply
end Adjunction
-- These lemmas are not global simp lemmas because certain adjunctions
-- are constructed using `Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv`, and we certainly
-- do not want `dsimp` to apply `homEquiv_unit` or `homEquiv_counit`
-- in that case. However, when proving general API results about adjunctions,
-- it may be advisable to add a local simp attribute to these lemmas.
attribute [local simp] Adjunction.homEquiv_unit Adjunction.homEquiv_counit
namespace Adjunction
@[ext]
lemma ext {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} {adj adj' : F ⊣ G}
(h : adj.unit = adj'.unit) : adj = adj' := by
suffices h' : adj.counit = adj'.counit by cases adj; cases adj'; aesop
ext X
apply (adj.homEquiv _ _).injective
rw [Adjunction.homEquiv_unit, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit,
Adjunction.right_triangle_components, h, Adjunction.right_triangle_components]
section
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G)
lemma isLeftAdjoint (adj : F ⊣ G) : F.IsLeftAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
lemma isRightAdjoint (adj : F ⊣ G) : G.IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
instance (R : D ⥤ C) [R.IsRightAdjoint] : R.leftAdjoint.IsLeftAdjoint :=
(ofIsRightAdjoint R).isLeftAdjoint
instance (L : C ⥤ D) [L.IsLeftAdjoint] : L.rightAdjoint.IsRightAdjoint :=
(ofIsLeftAdjoint L).isRightAdjoint
variable {X' X : C} {Y Y' : D}
theorem homEquiv_id (X : C) : adj.homEquiv X _ (𝟙 _) = adj.unit.app X := by simp
theorem homEquiv_symm_id (X : D) : (adj.homEquiv _ X).symm (𝟙 _) = adj.counit.app X := by simp
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_symm (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y) :
(adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm (f ≫ g) = F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y).symm g := by
simp
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y) :
(adj.homEquiv X' Y) (F.map f ≫ g) = f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y) g := by
rw [← Equiv.eq_symm_apply]
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply, eq_self_iff_true, homEquiv_naturality_left_symm]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right (f : F.obj X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(adj.homEquiv X Y') (f ≫ g) = (adj.homEquiv X Y) f ≫ G.map g := by
simp
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_symm (f : X ⟶ G.obj Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(adj.homEquiv X Y').symm (f ≫ G.map g) = (adj.homEquiv X Y).symm f ≫ g := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq]
simp only [homEquiv_naturality_right, eq_self_iff_true, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[reassoc]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_square (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y')
(h : F.obj X' ⟶ Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') (w : F.map f ≫ g = h ≫ k) :
f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y') g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y) h ≫ G.map k := by
rw [← homEquiv_naturality_left, ← homEquiv_naturality_right, w]
@[reassoc]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_square (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y')
(h : X' ⟶ G.obj Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') (w : f ≫ g = h ≫ G.map k) :
F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y').symm g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm h ≫ k := by
rw [← homEquiv_naturality_left_symm, ← homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, w]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_square_iff (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y')
(h : F.obj X' ⟶ Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') :
(f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y') g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y) h ≫ G.map k) ↔
(F.map f ≫ g = h ≫ k) :=
⟨fun w ↦ by simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
using homEquiv_naturality_right_square adj _ _ _ _ w,
homEquiv_naturality_left_square adj f g h k⟩
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_square_iff (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y')
(h : X' ⟶ G.obj Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y').symm g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm h ≫ k) ↔
(f ≫ g = h ≫ G.map k) :=
⟨fun w ↦ by simpa only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
using homEquiv_naturality_left_square adj _ _ _ _ w,
homEquiv_naturality_right_square adj f g h k⟩
@[simp]
theorem left_triangle : whiskerRight adj.unit F ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit = 𝟙 _ := by
ext; simp
|
@[simp]
theorem right_triangle : whiskerLeft G adj.unit ≫ whiskerRight adj.counit G = 𝟙 _ := by
ext; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counit_naturality {X Y : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Basic.lean | 255 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.GroupCompletion
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Ring
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Nonarchimedean.Completion
/-!
# Infinite sums and products in nonarchimedean abelian groups
Let `G` be a complete nonarchimedean abelian group and let `f : α → G` be a function. We prove that
`f` is unconditionally summable if and only if `f a` tends to zero on the cofinite filter on `α`
(`NonarchimedeanAddGroup.summable_iff_tendsto_cofinite_zero`). We also prove the analogous result in
the multiplicative setting (`NonarchimedeanGroup.multipliable_iff_tendsto_cofinite_one`).
We also prove that multiplication distributes over arbitrarily indexed sums in a nonarchimedean
ring. That is, let `R` be a nonarchimedean ring, let `f : α → R` be a function that sums to `a : R`,
and let `g : β → R` be a function that sums to `b : R`. Then `fun (i : α × β) ↦ (f i.1) * (g i.2)`
sums to `a * b` (`HasSum.mul_of_nonarchimedean`).
-/
open Filter Topology
namespace NonarchimedeanGroup
variable {α G : Type*}
| variable [CommGroup G] [UniformSpace G] [IsUniformGroup G] [NonarchimedeanGroup G]
/-- Let `G` be a nonarchimedean multiplicative abelian group, and let `f : α → G` be a function that
tends to one on the filter of cofinite sets. For each finite subset of `α`, consider the partial
product of `f` on that subset. These partial products form a Cauchy filter. -/
@[to_additive "Let `G` be a nonarchimedean additive abelian group, and let `f : α → G` be a function
that tends to zero on the filter of cofinite sets. For each finite subset of `α`, consider the
partial sum of `f` on that subset. These partial sums form a Cauchy filter."]
theorem cauchySeq_prod_of_tendsto_cofinite_one {f : α → G} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 1)) :
CauchySeq (fun s ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i) := by
/- Let `U` be a neighborhood of `1`. It suffices to show that there exists `s : Finset α` such
that for any `t : Finset α` disjoint from `s`, we have `∏ i ∈ t, f i ∈ U`. -/
apply cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing.mpr
intro U hU
-- Since `G` is nonarchimedean, `U` contains an open subgroup `V`.
rcases is_nonarchimedean U hU with ⟨V, hV⟩
/- Let `s` be the set of all indices `i : α` such that `f i ∉ V`. By our assumption `hf`, this is
finite. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Nonarchimedean.lean | 31 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
/-!
# Simple objects
We define simple objects in any category with zero morphisms.
A simple object is an object `Y` such that any monomorphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
is either an isomorphism or zero (but not both).
This is formalized as a `Prop` valued typeclass `Simple X`.
In some contexts, especially representation theory, simple objects are called "irreducibles".
If a morphism `f` out of a simple object is nonzero and has a kernel, then that kernel is zero.
(We state this as `kernel.ι f = 0`, but should add `kernel f ≅ 0`.)
When the category is abelian, being simple is the same as being cosimple (although we do not
state a separate typeclass for this).
As a consequence, any nonzero epimorphism out of a simple object is an isomorphism,
and any nonzero morphism into a simple object has trivial cokernel.
We show that any simple object is indecomposable.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- An object is simple if monomorphisms into it are (exclusively) either isomorphisms or zero. -/
class Simple (X : C) : Prop where
mono_isIso_iff_nonzero : ∀ {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [Mono f], IsIso f ↔ f ≠ 0
/-- A nonzero monomorphism to a simple object is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Mono f] (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso f :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero f).mpr w
theorem Simple.of_iso {X Y : C} [Simple Y] (i : X ≅ Y) : Simple X :=
{ mono_isIso_iff_nonzero := fun f m => by
constructor
· intro h w
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by infer_instance
rw [Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero] at j
subst w
simp at j
· intro h
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by
apply isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero
intro w
apply h
simpa using (cancel_mono i.inv).2 w
rw [← Category.comp_id f, ← i.hom_inv_id, ← Category.assoc]
infer_instance }
theorem Simple.iff_of_iso {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : Simple X ↔ Simple Y :=
⟨fun _ => Simple.of_iso i.symm, fun _ => Simple.of_iso i⟩
theorem kernel_zero_of_nonzero_from_simple {X Y : C} [Simple X] {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f]
(w : f ≠ 0) : kernel.ι f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
haveI := isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero h
exact w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
-- See also `mono_of_nonzero_from_simple`, which requires `Preadditive C`.
/-- A nonzero morphism `f` to a simple object is an epimorphism
(assuming `f` has an image, and `C` has equalizers).
-/
theorem epi_of_nonzero_to_simple [HasEqualizers C] {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f]
(w : f ≠ 0) : Epi f := by
rw [← image.fac f]
haveI : IsIso (image.ι f) := isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero fun h => w (eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero h)
apply epi_comp
theorem mono_to_simple_zero_of_not_iso {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Mono f]
(w : IsIso f → False) : f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
exact w (isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero h)
theorem id_nonzero (X : C) [Simple.{v} X] : 𝟙 X ≠ 0 :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero (𝟙 X)).mp (by infer_instance)
instance (X : C) [Simple.{v} X] : Nontrivial (End X) :=
nontrivial_of_ne 1 _ (id_nonzero X)
section
theorem Simple.not_isZero (X : C) [Simple X] : ¬IsZero X := by
simpa [Limits.IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] using id_nonzero X
variable [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
variable (C)
/-- We don't want the definition of 'simple' to include the zero object, so we check that here. -/
theorem zero_not_simple [Simple (0 : C)] : False :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero (0 : (0 : C) ⟶ (0 : C))).mp ⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩ rfl
end
end
-- We next make the dual arguments, but for this we must be in an abelian category.
section Abelian
variable [Abelian C]
/-- In an abelian category, an object satisfying the dual of the definition of a simple object is
simple. -/
theorem simple_of_cosimple (X : C) (h : ∀ {Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [Epi f], IsIso f ↔ f ≠ 0) :
Simple X :=
⟨fun {Y} f I => by
classical
fconstructor
· intros
have hx := cokernel.π_of_epi f
by_contra h
subst h
exact (h _).mp (cokernel.π_of_zero _ _) hx
· intro hf
suffices Epi f by exact isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
apply Preadditive.epi_of_cokernel_zero
by_contra h'
exact cokernel_not_iso_of_nonzero hf ((h _).mpr h')⟩
/-- A nonzero epimorphism from a simple object is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_epi_of_nonzero {X Y : C} [Simple X] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Epi f] (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso f :=
-- `f ≠ 0` means that `kernel.ι f` is not an iso, and hence zero, and hence `f` is a mono.
haveI : Mono f :=
Preadditive.mono_of_kernel_zero (mono_to_simple_zero_of_not_iso (kernel_not_iso_of_nonzero w))
isIso_of_mono_of_epi f
theorem cokernel_zero_of_nonzero_to_simple {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} (w : f ≠ 0) :
cokernel.π f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
haveI := isIso_of_epi_of_nonzero h
exact w (eq_zero_of_mono_cokernel f)
theorem epi_from_simple_zero_of_not_iso {X Y : C} [Simple X] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Epi f]
(w : IsIso f → False) : f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
exact w (isIso_of_epi_of_nonzero h)
end Abelian
section Indecomposable
variable [Preadditive C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
-- There are another three potential variations of this lemma,
-- but as any one suffices to prove `indecomposable_of_simple` we will not give them all.
theorem Biprod.isIso_inl_iff_isZero (X Y : C) : IsIso (biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ↔ IsZero Y := by
rw [biprod.isIso_inl_iff_id_eq_fst_comp_inl, ← biprod.total, add_eq_left]
constructor
· intro h
replace h := h =≫ biprod.snd
simpa [← IsZero.iff_isSplitEpi_eq_zero (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y)] using h
· intro h
rw [IsZero.iff_isSplitEpi_eq_zero (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y)] at h
rw [h, zero_comp]
/-- Any simple object in a preadditive category is indecomposable. -/
theorem indecomposable_of_simple (X : C) [Simple X] : Indecomposable X :=
⟨Simple.not_isZero X, fun Y Z i => by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun h => ?_
rw [IsZero.iff_isSplitMono_eq_zero (biprod.inl : Y ⟶ Y ⊞ Z)] at h
change biprod.inl ≠ 0 at h
have : Simple (Y ⊞ Z) := Simple.of_iso i.symm
rw [← Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero biprod.inl] at h
rwa [Biprod.isIso_inl_iff_isZero] at h⟩
end Indecomposable
section Subobject
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
open Subobject
|
instance {X : C} [Simple X] : Nontrivial (Subobject X) :=
nontrivial_of_not_isZero (Simple.not_isZero X)
instance {X : C} [Simple X] : IsSimpleOrder (Subobject X) where
eq_bot_or_eq_top := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟨Y : C, ⟨⟨⟩⟩, f : Y ⟶ X⟩, m : Mono f⟩⟩
change mk f = ⊥ ∨ mk f = ⊤
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Simple.lean | 205 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
fun h x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_map.1 hx
exact h _ hy⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (x : s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) = f '' s :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_map, Set.mem_image, implies_true])
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.map f) = f '' s := coe_map f s
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem map_perm {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : s.map (σ : α ↪ α) = s :=
coe_injective <| (coe_map _ _).trans <| Set.image_perm hs
theorem map_toFinset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.map f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_map, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : s.map (Embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem map_cast_heq {α β} (h : α = β) (s : Finset α) :
HEq (s.map (Equiv.cast h).toEmbedding) s := by
subst h
simp
theorem map_map (f : α ↪ β) (g : β ↪ γ) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
theorem map_comm {β'} {f : β ↪ γ} {g : α ↪ β} {f' : α ↪ β'} {g' : β' ↪ γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.map g).map f = (s.map f').map g' := by
simp_rw [map_map, Embedding.trans, Function.comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_map {f : α ↪ β} {ga : α ↪ α} {gb : β ↪ β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) := fun _ =>
map_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_map {f g : α ↪ α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ xs => (mem_map' _).1 <| h <| (mem_map' f).2 xs,
fun h => by simp [subset_def, Multiset.map_subset_map h]⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_subset⟩ := map_subset_map
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.subset_symm_image`. -/
theorem subset_map_symm {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : s ⊆ t.map f.symm ↔ s.map f ⊆ t := by
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv, Equiv.symm_symm] at hx
simpa using h hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv]
exact h (by simp [hx])
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.symm_image_subset`. -/
theorem map_symm_subset {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : t.map f.symm ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ s.map f := by
simp only [← subset_map_symm, Equiv.symm_symm]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the order embedding that maps a finset to its
image under `f`. -/
def mapEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) : Finset α ↪o Finset β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (map f) fun _ _ => map_subset_map
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective.eq_iff
theorem map_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Injective (map f) :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective
@[simp]
theorem map_ssubset_map {s t : Finset α} : s.map f ⊂ t.map f ↔ s ⊂ t := (mapEmbedding f).lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_ssubset⟩ := map_ssubset_map
@[simp]
theorem mapEmbedding_apply : mapEmbedding f s = map f s :=
rfl
theorem filter_map {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
eq_of_veq (Multiset.filter_map _ _ _)
lemma map_filter' (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α)
[DecidablePred (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = ·)] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [Function.comp_def, filter_map, f.injective.eq_iff]
lemma filter_attach' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
s.attach.filter p =
(s.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map
⟨Subtype.map id <| filter_subset _ _, Subtype.map_injective _ injective_id⟩ :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach' _ _
lemma filter_attach (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
s.attach.filter (fun a : s ↦ p a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map ((Embedding.refl _).subtypeMap mem_of_mem_filter) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach _ _
theorem map_filter {f : α ≃ β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).map f.toEmbedding = (s.map f.toEmbedding).filter (p ∘ f.symm) := by
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_map {s t : Finset α} (f : α ↪ β) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
mod_cast Set.disjoint_image_iff f.injective (s := s) (t := t)
theorem map_disjUnion {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h) (h' := (disjoint_map _).mpr h) :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_add _ _ _
/-- A version of `Finset.map_disjUnion` for writing in the other direction. -/
theorem map_disjUnion' {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h') (h := (disjoint_map _).mp h') :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
map_disjUnion _ _ _
theorem map_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem map_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_inter f.injective (s := s₁) (t := s₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_map, coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_insert [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(cons a s ha).map f = cons (f a) (s.map f) (by simpa using ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_cons f a s.val
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := (map_injective f).eq_iff' (map_empty f)
@[simp]
theorem map_nonempty : (s.map f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := s)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.map⟩ := map_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem map_nontrivial : (s.map f).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
mod_cast Set.image_nontrivial f.injective (s := s)
theorem attach_map_val {s : Finset α} : s.attach.map (Embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq <| by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact Multiset.attach_map_val _
end Map
theorem range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨fun i => i + 1, fun i j => by simp⟩) := by
ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩) <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section Image
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
(s.1.map f).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).dedup :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : Finset α).image f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f g : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {a : α} {b c : β}
@[simp]
theorem mem_image : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b := by
simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
lemma forall_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
lemma exists_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image := forall_mem_image
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq (s.map f).2.dedup.symm
-- Not `@[simp]` since `mem_image` already gets most of the way there.
theorem mem_image_const : c ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ b = c := by
rw [mem_image]
simp only [exists_prop, const_apply, exists_and_right]
rfl
theorem mem_image_const_self : b ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mem_image_const.trans <| and_iff_left rfl
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift β α c p] :
CanLift (Finset β) (Finset α) (image c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨⟨l⟩, hd : l.Nodup⟩ hl
lift l to List α using hl
exact ⟨⟨l, hd.of_map _⟩, ext fun a => by simp⟩
theorem image_congr (h : (s : Set α).EqOn f g) : Finset.image f s = Finset.image g s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_image, ← bex_def]
exact exists₂_congr fun x hx => by rw [h hx]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_finset_image (hf : Injective f) :
f a ∈ s.image f ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem f⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, heq⟩ := mem_image.1 h
exact hf heq ▸ hy
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
Set.ext <| by simp only [mem_coe, mem_image, Set.mem_image, implies_true]
@[simp]
lemma image_nonempty : (s.image f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := (s : Set α))
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.image (h : s.Nonempty) (f : α → β) : (s.image f).Nonempty :=
image_nonempty.2 h
alias ⟨Nonempty.of_image, _⟩ := image_nonempty
theorem image_toFinset [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.image f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, Multiset.mem_toFinset, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_map]
theorem image_val_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (image f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
(s.2.map_on H).dedup
@[simp]
theorem image_id [DecidableEq α] : s.image id = s :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, id, exists_eq_right]
@[simp]
theorem image_id' [DecidableEq α] : (s.image fun x => x) = s :=
image_id
theorem image_image [DecidableEq γ] {g : β → γ} : (s.image f).image g = s.image (g ∘ f) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [image_val, dedup_map_dedup_eq, Multiset.map_map]
theorem image_comm {β'} [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'}
{g' : β' → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) :
(s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by simp_rw [image_image, comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f g : α → α}
(h : Function.Commute f g) : Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_image h
theorem image_subset_image {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.image f ⊆ s₂.image f := by
simp only [subset_def, image_val, subset_dedup', dedup_subset', Multiset.map_subset_map h]
theorem image_subset_iff : s.image f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t :=
calc
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ f '' ↑s ⊆ ↑t := by norm_cast
_ ↔ _ := Set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (Finset.image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset_image
lemma image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
simpa only [funext (map_eq_image _)] using map_injective ⟨f, hf⟩
lemma image_inj {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f = t.image f ↔ s = t :=
(image_injective hf).eq_iff
theorem image_subset_image_iff {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) :
s.image f ⊆ t.image f ↔ s ⊆ t :=
mod_cast Set.image_subset_image_iff hf (s := s) (t := t)
lemma image_ssubset_image {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f ⊂ t.image f ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp_rw [← lt_iff_ssubset]
exact lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (image_subset_image_iff hf) (image_subset_image_iff hf)
theorem coe_image_subset_range : ↑(s.image f) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s := coe_image
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem filter_image {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.image f).filter p = (s.filter fun a ↦ p (f a)).image f :=
ext fun b => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_image, exists_prop]
exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image {y : β} : (s.filter (f · = y)).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem image_union [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∪ s₂.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem image_inter_subset [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).image f ⊆ s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
(image_mono f).map_inf_le s t
theorem image_inter_of_injOn [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s t : Finset α)
(hf : Set.InjOn f (s ∪ t)) : (s ∩ t).image f = s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_inter_on fun a ha b hb => hf (Or.inr ha) <| Or.inl hb
theorem image_inter [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective f) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∩ s₂.image f :=
image_inter_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : image f {a} = {f a} :=
ext fun x => by simpa only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left] using eq_comm
@[simp]
theorem image_insert [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).image f = insert (f a) (s.image f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, image_singleton, image_union]
theorem erase_image_subset_image_erase [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.image f).erase (f a) ⊆ (s.erase a).image f := by
simp only [subset_iff, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_image, exists_imp, mem_erase]
| rintro b hb x hx rfl
exact ⟨_, ⟨ne_of_apply_ne f hb, hx⟩, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 438 | 440 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Complex trigonometric functions
Basic facts and derivatives for the complex trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter
open scoped Real
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_tan {x : ℂ} (h : cos x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt tan (1 / cos x ^ 2) x := by
convert (hasStrictDerivAt_sin x).div (hasStrictDerivAt_cos x) h using 1
rw_mod_cast [← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x]
ring
theorem hasDerivAt_tan {x : ℂ} (h : cos x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt tan (1 / cos x ^ 2) x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_tan h).hasDerivAt
open scoped Topology
theorem tendsto_norm_tan_of_cos_eq_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : cos x = 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => ‖tan x‖) (𝓝[≠] x) atTop := by
simp only [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, norm_div]
| have A : sin x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simpa [*, sq] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq x
have B : Tendsto cos (𝓝[≠] x) (𝓝[≠] 0) :=
hx ▸ (hasDerivAt_cos x).tendsto_nhdsNE (neg_ne_zero.2 A)
exact continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.norm.pos_mul_atTop (norm_pos_iff.2 A)
(tendsto_norm_nhdsNE_zero.comp B).inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_norm_tan_atTop (k : ℤ) :
Tendsto (fun x => ‖tan x‖) (𝓝[≠] ((2 * k + 1) * π / 2 : ℂ)) atTop :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/ComplexDeriv.lean | 37 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.SeparatedMap
/-!
# Local homeomorphisms
This file defines local homeomorphisms.
## Main definitions
For a function `f : X → Y ` between topological spaces, we say
* `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if `f` is a local homeomorphism around each point of `s`: for each
`x : X`, the restriction of `f` to some open neighborhood `U` of `x` gives a homeomorphism
between `U` and an open subset of `Y`.
* `IsLocalHomeomorph f`: `f` is a local homeomorphism, i.e. it's a local homeomorphism on `univ`.
Note that `IsLocalHomeomorph` is a global condition. This is in contrast to
`PartialHomeomorph`, which is a homeomorphism between specific open subsets.
## Main results
* local homeomorphisms are locally injective open maps
* more!
-/
open Topology
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] (g : Y → Z)
(f : X → Y) (s : Set X) (t : Set Y)
/-- A function `f : X → Y` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s` if each `x ∈ s` is contained in
the source of some `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` with `f = e`. -/
def IsLocalHomeomorphOn :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ f = e
theorem isLocalHomeomorphOn_iff_isOpenEmbedding_restrict {f : X → Y} :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, IsOpenEmbedding (U.restrict f) := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨e, hxe, rfl⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨e.source, e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe, e.isOpenEmbedding_restrict⟩
· obtain ⟨U, hU, emb⟩ := h x hx
have : IsOpenEmbedding ((interior U).restrict f) := by
refine emb.comp ⟨.inclusion interior_subset, ?_⟩
rw [Set.range_inclusion]; exact isOpen_induced isOpen_interior
obtain ⟨cont, inj, openMap⟩ := isOpenEmbedding_iff_continuous_injective_isOpenMap.mp this
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
exact ⟨PartialHomeomorph.ofContinuousOpenRestrict
(Set.injOn_iff_injective.mpr inj).toPartialEquiv
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mpr cont) openMap isOpen_interior,
mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mpr hU, rfl⟩
namespace IsLocalHomeomorphOn
/-- Proves that `f` satisfies `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`. The condition `h` is weaker than the
definition of `IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s`, since it only requires `e : PartialHomeomorph X Y` to
agree with `f` on its source `e.source`, as opposed to on the whole space `X`. -/
theorem mk (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph X Y, x ∈ e.source ∧ Set.EqOn f e e.source) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f s := by
intro x hx
| obtain ⟨e, hx, he⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨{ e with
toFun := f
map_source' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.map_source' hx
left_inv' := fun _x hx ↦ by rw [he hx]; exact e.left_inv' hx
right_inv' := fun _y hy ↦ by rw [he (e.map_target' hy)]; exact e.right_inv' hy
continuousOn_toFun := (continuousOn_congr he).mpr e.continuousOn_toFun },
hx, rfl⟩
/-- A `PartialHomeomorph` is a local homeomorphism on its source. -/
lemma PartialHomeomorph.isLocalHomeomorphOn (e : PartialHomeomorph X Y) :
| Mathlib/Topology/IsLocalHomeomorph.lean | 66 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle
/-!
# Closure, interior, and frontier of preimages under `re` and `im`
In this fact we use the fact that `ℂ` is naturally homeomorphic to `ℝ × ℝ` to deduce some
topological properties of `Complex.re` and `Complex.im`.
## Main statements
Each statement about `Complex.re` listed below has a counterpart about `Complex.im`.
* `Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re`: `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial
topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`;
* `Complex.isOpenMap_re`, `Complex.isQuotientMap_re`: in particular, `Complex.re` is an open map
and is a quotient map;
* `Complex.interior_preimage_re`, `Complex.closure_preimage_re`, `Complex.frontier_preimage_re`:
formulas for `interior (Complex.re ⁻¹' s)` etc;
* `Complex.interior_setOf_re_le` etc: particular cases of the above formulas in the cases when `s`
is one of the infinite intervals `Set.Ioi a`, `Set.Ici a`, `Set.Iio a`, and `Set.Iic a`,
formulated as `interior {z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a} = {z | z.re < a}` etc.
## Tags
complex, real part, imaginary part, closure, interior, frontier
-/
open Set Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
/-- `Complex.re` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ re :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- `Complex.im` turns `ℂ` into a trivial topological fiber bundle over `ℝ`. -/
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ im :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.trans (Homeomorph.prodComm ℝ ℝ), fun _ => rfl⟩
theorem isOpenMap_re : IsOpenMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isOpenMap_im : IsOpenMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isOpenMap_proj
theorem isQuotientMap_re : IsQuotientMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_re := isQuotientMap_re
theorem isQuotientMap_im : IsQuotientMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isQuotientMap_proj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap_im := isQuotientMap_im
theorem interior_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : interior (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem interior_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : interior (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : closure (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem closure_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : closure (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_im _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_re _).symm
theorem frontier_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_im _).symm
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | a < z.re } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | a < z.im } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | a ≤ z.re } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | a ≤ z.im } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_im (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_re (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_im (Iic a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_re (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_im (Ici a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_re (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_im (Iio a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_re (Ioi a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_im (Ioi a)
theorem closure_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : closure (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_closure] using @closure_prod_eq _ _ _ _ s t
theorem interior_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : interior (s ×ℂ t) = interior s ×ℂ interior t := by
rw [reProdIm, reProdIm, interior_inter, interior_preimage_re, interior_preimage_im]
theorem frontier_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) :
frontier (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ frontier t ∪ frontier s ×ℂ closure t := by
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_frontier] using frontier_prod_eq s t
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_le_im (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ b ≤ im z } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ b ≤ im z } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, frontier_Ici] using frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Ici b)
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re_and_im_le (a b : ℝ) :
frontier { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z ≤ b } = { z | a ≤ re z ∧ im z = b ∨ re z = a ∧ im z ≤ b } := by
simpa only [closure_Ici, closure_Iic, frontier_Ici, frontier_Iic] using
frontier_reProdIm (Ici a) (Iic b)
end Complex
open Complex Metric
variable {s t : Set ℝ}
theorem IsOpen.reProdIm (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ×ℂ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_re).inter (ht.preimage continuous_im)
| theorem IsClosed.reProdIm (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ×ℂ t) :=
(hs.preimage continuous_re).inter (ht.preimage continuous_im)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/ReImTopology.lean | 178 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.LinearOrder
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# Nontrivial types
Results about `Nontrivial`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
theorem nontrivial_of_lt [Preorder α] (x y : α) (h : x < y) : Nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, ne_of_lt h⟩⟩
theorem exists_pair_lt (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] [LinearOrder α] : ∃ x y : α, x < y := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
cases lt_or_gt_of_ne hxy <;> exact ⟨_, _, ‹_›⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_lt [LinearOrder α] : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x < y :=
⟨fun h ↦ @exists_pair_lt α h _, fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ nontrivial_of_lt x y h⟩
theorem Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (p : α → Prop) (x : Subtype p) :
Nontrivial (Subtype p) ↔ ∃ (y : α) (_ : p y), y ≠ x := by
simp only [_root_.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x, Subtype.exists, Ne, Subtype.ext_iff]
open Classical in
/-- An inhabited type is either nontrivial, or has a unique element. -/
noncomputable def nontrivialPSumUnique (α : Type*) [Inhabited α] :
Nontrivial α ⊕' Unique α :=
if h : Nontrivial α then PSum.inl h
else
PSum.inr
{ default := default,
uniq := fun x : α ↦ by
by_contra H
exact h ⟨_, _, H⟩ }
instance Option.nontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Option α) := by
inhabit α
exact ⟨none, some default, nofun⟩
/-- Pushforward a `Nontrivial` instance along an injective function. -/
protected theorem Function.Injective.nontrivial [Nontrivial α] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Nontrivial β :=
let ⟨x, y, h⟩ := exists_pair_ne α
⟨⟨f x, f y, hf.ne h⟩⟩
/-- An injective function from a nontrivial type has an argument at
which it does not take a given value. -/
protected theorem Function.Injective.exists_ne [Nontrivial α] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (y : β) : ∃ x, f x ≠ y := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨x₁, x₂, hx⟩
by_cases h : f x₂ = y
· exact ⟨x₁, (hf.ne_iff' h).2 hx⟩
· exact ⟨x₂, h⟩
instance nontrivial_prod_right [Nonempty α] [Nontrivial β] : Nontrivial (α × β) :=
Prod.snd_surjective.nontrivial
instance nontrivial_prod_left [Nontrivial α] [Nonempty β] : Nontrivial (α × β) :=
Prod.fst_surjective.nontrivial
namespace Pi
variable {I : Type*} {f : I → Type*}
open Classical in
/-- A pi type is nontrivial if it's nonempty everywhere and nontrivial somewhere. -/
theorem nontrivial_at (i' : I) [inst : ∀ i, Nonempty (f i)] [Nontrivial (f i')] :
Nontrivial (∀ i : I, f i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq (∀ i : I, f i)
exact (Function.update_injective (fun i ↦ Classical.choice (inst i)) i').nontrivial
/-- As a convenience, provide an instance automatically if `(f default)` is nontrivial.
If a different index has the non-trivial type, then use `haveI := nontrivial_at that_index`.
-/
instance nontrivial [Inhabited I] [∀ i, Nonempty (f i)] [Nontrivial (f default)] :
Nontrivial (∀ i : I, f i) :=
| nontrivial_at default
end Pi
| Mathlib/Logic/Nontrivial/Basic.lean | 90 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
| @[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 279 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Ira Fesefeldt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ira Fesefeldt
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
/-!
# Ordinal Approximants for the Fixed points on complete lattices
This file sets up the ordinal-indexed approximation theory of fixed points
of a monotone function in a complete lattice [Cousot1979].
The proof follows loosely the one from [Echenique2005].
However, the proof given here is not constructive as we use the non-constructive axiomatization of
ordinals from mathlib. It still allows an approximation scheme indexed over the ordinals.
## Main definitions
* `OrdinalApprox.lfpApprox`: The ordinal-indexed approximation of the least fixed point
greater or equal than an initial value of a bundled monotone function.
* `OrdinalApprox.gfpApprox`: The ordinal-indexed approximation of the greatest fixed point
less or equal than an initial value of a bundled monotone function.
## Main theorems
* `OrdinalApprox.lfp_mem_range_lfpApprox`: The ordinal-indexed approximation of
the least fixed point eventually reaches the least fixed point
* `OrdinalApprox.gfp_mem_range_gfpApprox`: The ordinal-indexed approximation of
the greatest fixed point eventually reaches the greatest fixed point
## References
* [F. Echenique, *A short and constructive proof of Tarski’s fixed-point theorem*][Echenique2005]
* [P. Cousot & R. Cousot, *Constructive Versions of Tarski's Fixed Point Theorems*][Cousot1979]
## Tags
fixed point, complete lattice, monotone function, ordinals, approximation
-/
namespace Cardinal
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
variable (g : Ordinal → α)
open Cardinal Ordinal SuccOrder Function Set
theorem not_injective_limitation_set : ¬ InjOn g (Iio (ord <| succ #α)) := by
intro h_inj
have h := lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective <| injOn_iff_injective.1 h_inj
have mk_initialSeg_subtype :
#(Iio (ord <| succ #α)) = lift.{u + 1} (succ #α) := by
simpa only [coe_setOf, card_typein, card_ord] using mk_Iio_ordinal (ord <| succ #α)
rw [mk_initialSeg_subtype, lift_lift, lift_le] at h
exact not_le_of_lt (Order.lt_succ #α) h
end Cardinal
namespace OrdinalApprox
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
variable [CompleteLattice α] (f : α →o α) (x : α)
open Function fixedPoints Cardinal Order OrderHom
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
/-- The ordinal-indexed sequence approximating the least fixed point greater than
an initial value `x`. It is defined in such a way that we have `lfpApprox 0 x = x` and
`lfpApprox a x = ⨆ b < a, f (lfpApprox b x)`. -/
def lfpApprox (a : Ordinal.{u}) : α :=
sSup ({ f (lfpApprox b) | (b : Ordinal) (h : b < a) } ∪ {x})
termination_by a
decreasing_by exact h
theorem lfpApprox_monotone : Monotone (lfpApprox f x) := by
| intros a b h
rw [lfpApprox, lfpApprox]
refine sSup_le_sSup ?h
apply sup_le_sup_right
simp only [exists_prop, Set.le_eq_subset, Set.setOf_subset_setOf, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intros a' h'
use a'
exact ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le h' h, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPointApproximants.lean | 77 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.StarAlgHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
/-!
# Non-unital Star Subalgebras
In this file we define `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them
(`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
namespace StarMemClass
/-- If a type carries an involutive star, then any star-closed subset does too. -/
instance instInvolutiveStar {S R : Type*} [InvolutiveStar R] [SetLike S R] [StarMemClass S R]
(s : S) : InvolutiveStar s where
star_involutive r := Subtype.ext <| star_star (r : R)
/-- In a star magma (i.e., a multiplication with an antimultiplicative involutive star
operation), any star-closed subset which is also closed under multiplication is itself a star
magma. -/
instance instStarMul {S R : Type*} [Mul R] [StarMul R] [SetLike S R]
[MulMemClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarMul s where
star_mul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_mul _ _
/-- In a `StarAddMonoid` (i.e., an additive monoid with an additive involutive star operation), any
star-closed subset which is also closed under addition and contains zero is itself a
`StarAddMonoid`. -/
instance instStarAddMonoid {S R : Type*} [AddMonoid R] [StarAddMonoid R] [SetLike S R]
[AddSubmonoidClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarAddMonoid s where
star_add _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_add _ _
/-- In a star ring (i.e., a non-unital, non-associative, semiring with an additive,
antimultiplicative, involutive star operation), a star-closed non-unital subsemiring is itself a
star ring. -/
instance instStarRing {S R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [StarRing R] [SetLike S R]
[NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarRing s :=
{ StarMemClass.instStarMul s, StarMemClass.instStarAddMonoid s with }
/-- In a star `R`-module (i.e., `star (r • m) = (star r) • m`) any star-closed subset which is also
closed under the scalar action by `R` is itself a star `R`-module. -/
instance instStarModule {S : Type*} (R : Type*) {M : Type*} [Star R] [Star M] [SMul R M]
[StarModule R M] [SetLike S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] [StarMemClass S M] (s : S) :
StarModule R s where
star_smul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_smul _ _
end StarMemClass
universe u u' v v' w w' w''
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u}
variable {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
variable [Star A] [Module R A]
variable {S : Type w''} [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A]
variable [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
/-- Embedding of a non-unital star subalgebra into the non-unital star algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype s with
toFun := Subtype.val
map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital star subalgebra is a non-unital subalgebra which is closed under the `star`
operation. -/
structure NonUnitalStarSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
/-- The `carrier` of a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` is closed under the `star` operation. -/
star_mem' : ∀ {a : A} (_ha : a ∈ carrier), star a ∈ carrier
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
instance instSetLike : SetLike (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
coe {s} := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass`, `SMulMemClass` and `StarMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
star_mem' := star_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
(∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) ∧ ∀ {x}, x ∈ s → star x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2.1
star_mem' := h.2.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem {s} := s.smul_mem'
instance instStarMemClass : StarMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
star_mem {s} := s.star_mem'
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := fun _S {x} hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubalgebra : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_inj {S U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = U.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S₁.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Copy of a non-unital star subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.copy s hs with
star_mem' := @fun x (hx : x ∈ s) => by
show star x ∈ s
rw [hs] at hx ⊢
exact S.star_mem' hx }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
variable (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A)
/-- A non-unital star subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x} : x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] {S U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
instance instInhabited : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra)⟩
section
/-! `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and
`NonUnitalSubringClass` instances. -/
instance toNonUnitalSemiring {R A} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring {R A} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing {R A} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing {R A} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra' : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
section
/-! `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance module' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.module'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.instIsScalarTower'
instance instIsScalarTower [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
end
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_subtype :
NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S = NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S :=
rfl
/-- Transport a non-unital star subalgebra via a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.map (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B)
star_mem' := by rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨star a, star_mem (s := S) ha, map_star f a⟩
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} :
y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_map
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B).toNonUnitalSubalgebra =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.map f S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : map f S = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital star subalgebra under a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.comap f
star_mem' := @fun a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (star a) ∈ S from (map_star f a).symm ▸ star_mem (s := S) ha
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _S _U => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : comap f S = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance instNoZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] [Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)
/-- A non-unital subalgebra closed under `star` is a non-unital star subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra (h_star : ∀ x, x ∈ s → star x ∈ s) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A :=
{ s with
star_mem' := @h_star }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {h_star} {x} :
x ∈ s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (h_star) :
(s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star : Set A) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (h_star) :
(s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra fun _ => star_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHom
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgHom.range (φ : A →ₙₐ[R] B)
star_mem' := by rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨star a, map_star φ a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) :=
by ext; rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]; rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] S where
toNonUnitalAlgHom := NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hf
map_star' := fun a => Subtype.ext <| map_star f a
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital star algebra homomorphism `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) :
A →⋆ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f)
(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital star `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer ϕ ψ
star_mem' := @fun x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) => by simp [map_star, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
end NonUnitalStarAlgHom
namespace StarAlgEquiv
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
/-- Restrict a non-unital star algebra homomorphism with a left inverse to an algebra isomorphism
to its range.
This is a computable alternative to `StarAlgEquiv.ofInjective`. -/
def ofLeftInverse' {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
A ≃⋆ₐ[R] NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f :=
{ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.rangeRestrict f with
toFun := NonUnitalStarAlgHom.rangeRestrict f
invFun := g ∘ (NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype <| NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f)
left_inv := h
right_inv := fun x =>
Subtype.ext <|
let ⟨x', hx'⟩ := (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mem_range f).mp x.prop
show f (g x) = x by rw [← hx', h x'] }
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse'_apply {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : A) :
ofLeftInverse' h x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse'_symm_apply {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(x : NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f) : (ofLeftInverse' h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
/-- Restrict an injective non-unital star algebra homomorphism to a star algebra isomorphism -/
noncomputable def ofInjective' (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
A ≃⋆ₐ[R] NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f :=
ofLeftInverse' (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasLeftInverse)
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective'_apply (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : A) :
ofInjective' f hf x = f x :=
rfl
end StarAlgEquiv
/-! ### The star closure of a subalgebra -/
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
open scoped Pointwise
variable [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing A] [Module R A]
variable [StarModule R A]
/-- The pointwise `star` of a non-unital subalgebra is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
instance instInvolutiveStar : InvolutiveStar (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) where
star S :=
{ carrier := star S.carrier
mul_mem' := @fun x y hx hy => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_mul x y).symm ▸ mul_mem hy hx
add_mem' := @fun x y hx hy => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_add x y).symm ▸ add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := Set.mem_star.mp ((star_zero A).symm ▸ zero_mem S : star (0 : A) ∈ S)
smul_mem' := fun r x hx => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_smul r x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem (star r) hx }
star_involutive S := NonUnitalSubalgebra.ext fun x =>
⟨fun hx => star_star x ▸ hx, fun hx => ((star_star x).symm ▸ hx : star (star x) ∈ S)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_star_iff (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (x : A) : x ∈ star S ↔ star x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
theorem star_mem_star_iff (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (x : A) : star x ∈ star S ↔ x ∈ S := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_star (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : star S = star (S : Set A) :=
rfl
theorem star_mono : Monotone (star : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
fun _ _ h _ hx => h hx
variable (R)
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The star operation on `NonUnitalSubalgebra` commutes with `NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem star_adjoin_comm (s : Set A) :
star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s) = NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (star s) :=
have this :
∀ t : Set A, NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (star t) ≤ star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R t) := fun _ =>
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_le fun _ hx => NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R hx
le_antisymm (by simpa only [star_star] using NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_mono (this (star s)))
(this s)
variable {R}
/-- The `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` obtained from `S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A` by taking the
smallest non-unital subalgebra containing both `S` and `star S`. -/
@[simps!]
def starClosure (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S ⊔ star S
star_mem' := @fun a (ha : a ∈ S ⊔ star S) => show star a ∈ S ⊔ star S by
simp only [← mem_star_iff _ a, ← (@NonUnitalAlgebra.gi R A _ _ _ _ _).l_sup_u _ _] at *
convert ha using 2
simp only [Set.sup_eq_union, star_adjoin_comm, Set.union_star, coe_star, star_star,
Set.union_comm]
theorem starClosure_le {S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A}
(h : S₁ ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra) : S₁.starClosure ≤ S₂ :=
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff.1 <|
sup_le h fun x hx =>
(star_star x ▸ star_mem (show star x ∈ S₂ from h <| (S₁.mem_star_iff _).1 hx) : x ∈ S₂)
theorem starClosure_le_iff {S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S₁.starClosure ≤ S₂ ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra :=
⟨fun h => le_sup_left.trans h, starClosure_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem starClosure_toNonunitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.starClosure.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = S ⊔ star S :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem starClosure_mono : Monotone (starClosure (R := R) (A := A)) :=
fun _ _ h => starClosure_le <| h.trans le_sup_left
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing A] [Module R A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [StarRing B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
section StarSubAlgebraA
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [StarModule R A]
open scoped Pointwise
open NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
variable (R)
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s)
star_mem' _ := by
rwa [NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier, ← NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_star_iff,
NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_adjoin_comm, Set.union_star, star_star, Set.union_comm]
theorem adjoin_eq_starClosure_adjoin (s : Set A) :
adjoin R s = (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s).starClosure :=
toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective <| show
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s) =
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s ⊔ star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s)
from
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_adjoin_comm R s).symm ▸ NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_union s (star s)
theorem adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin (s : Set A) : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
Set.subset_union_left.trans <| NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R
theorem star_subset_adjoin (s : Set A) : star s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
Set.subset_union_right.trans <| NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R <| Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton x)
theorem star_self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : star x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
star_mem <| self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x : A) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R s hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(zero : p 0 (zero_mem _)) (mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ (r : R) x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
(star : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p (star x) (star_mem hx))
{a : A} (ha : a ∈ adjoin R s) : p a ha := by
refine NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_induction (fun x hx ↦ ?_) add zero mul smul ha
simp only [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_star] at hx
obtain (hx | hx) := hx
· exact mem x hx
· simpa using star _ (NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (by simpa using Or.inl hx)) (mem _ hx)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑) := by
intro s S
rw [← toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff, adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra,
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_le_iff, coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra]
exact ⟨fun h => Set.subset_union_left.trans h,
fun h => Set.union_subset h fun x hx => star_star x ▸ star_mem (show star x ∈ S from h hx)⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc _ _
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R (s : Set A))
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (Subsemigroup.closure (s ∪ star s)) := by
rw [adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_eq_span]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule {R} [CommSemiring R] [Module R A] (s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.starClosure_eq_adjoin (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
S.starClosure = adjoin R (S : Set A) :=
le_antisymm (NonUnitalSubalgebra.starClosure_le_iff.2 <| subset_adjoin R (S : Set A))
(adjoin_le (le_sup_left : S ≤ S ⊔ star S))
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gi
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubalgebra :
(⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = ⊤ := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_eq_top {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubalgebra
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_left
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_right
|
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 764 | 765 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
/-!
# The standard basis
This file defines the standard basis `Pi.basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ι j) R (M j))`,
which is the `Σ j, ι j`-indexed basis of `Π j, M j`. The basis vectors are given by
`Pi.basis s ⟨j, i⟩ j' = Pi.single j' (s j) i = if j = j' then s i else 0`.
The standard basis on `R^η`, i.e. `η → R` is called `Pi.basisFun`.
To give a concrete example, `Pi.single (i : Fin 3) (1 : R)`
gives the `i`th unit basis vector in `R³`, and `Pi.basisFun R (Fin 3)` proves
this is a basis over `Fin 3 → R`.
## Main definitions
- `Pi.basis s`: given a basis `s i` for each `M i`, the standard basis on `Π i, M i`
- `Pi.basisFun R η`: the standard basis on `R^η`, i.e. `η → R`, given by
`Pi.basisFun R η i j = Pi.single i 1 j = if i = j then 1 else 0`.
- `Matrix.stdBasis R n m`: the standard basis on `Matrix n m R`, given by
`Matrix.stdBasis R n m (i, j) i' j' = if (i, j) = (i', j') then 1 else 0`.
-/
open Function Set Submodule
namespace Pi
open LinearMap
open Set
variable {R : Type*}
section Module
variable {η : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*} {Ms : η → Type*}
theorem linearIndependent_single [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (Ms i)] [∀ i, Module R (Ms i)]
[DecidableEq η] (v : ∀ j, ιs j → Ms j) (hs : ∀ i, LinearIndependent R (v i)) :
LinearIndependent R fun ji : Σj, ιs j ↦ Pi.single ji.1 (v ji.1 ji.2) := by
have hs' : ∀ j : η, LinearIndependent R fun i : ιs j => LinearMap.single R Ms j (v j i) := by
intro j
exact (hs j).map' _ (LinearMap.ker_single _ _ _)
apply linearIndependent_iUnion_finite hs'
intro j J _ hiJ
have h₀ :
∀ j, span R (range fun i : ιs j => LinearMap.single R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
LinearMap.range (LinearMap.single R Ms j) := by
intro j
rw [span_le, LinearMap.range_coe]
apply range_comp_subset_range
have h₁ :
span R (range fun i : ιs j => LinearMap.single R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
⨆ i ∈ ({j} : Set _), LinearMap.range (LinearMap.single R Ms i) := by
rw [@iSup_singleton _ _ _ fun i => LinearMap.range (LinearMap.single R (Ms) i)]
apply h₀
have h₂ :
⨆ j ∈ J, span R (range fun i : ιs j => LinearMap.single R Ms j (v j i)) ≤
⨆ j ∈ J, LinearMap.range (LinearMap.single R (fun j : η => Ms j) j) :=
iSup₂_mono fun i _ => h₀ i
have h₃ : Disjoint (fun i : η => i ∈ ({j} : Set _)) J := by
convert Set.disjoint_singleton_left.2 hiJ using 0
exact (disjoint_single_single _ _ _ _ h₃).mono h₁ h₂
theorem linearIndependent_single_one (ι R : Type*) [Ring R] [DecidableEq ι] :
LinearIndependent R (fun i : ι ↦ Pi.single i (1 : R)) := by
rw [← linearIndependent_equiv (Equiv.sigmaPUnit ι)]
exact Pi.linearIndependent_single (fun (_ : ι) (_ : Unit) ↦ (1 : R))
<| by simp +contextual [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff]
lemma linearIndependent_single_of_ne_zero {ι R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [DecidableEq ι] {v : ι → M} (hv : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0) :
LinearIndependent R fun i : ι ↦ Pi.single i (v i) := by
rw [← linearIndependent_equiv (Equiv.sigmaPUnit ι)]
exact linearIndependent_single (fun i (_ : Unit) ↦ v i) <| by
simp +contextual [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, hv]
@[deprecated linearIndependent_single_of_ne_zero (since := "2025-04-14")]
theorem linearIndependent_single_ne_zero {ι R : Type*} [Ring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [DecidableEq ι]
{v : ι → R} (hv : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0) : LinearIndependent R (fun i : ι ↦ Pi.single i (v i)) :=
linearIndependent_single_of_ne_zero hv
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Ms i)] [∀ i, Module R (Ms i)]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype η]
open LinearEquiv
/-- `Pi.basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j))` is the `Σ j, ιs j`-indexed basis on `Π j, Ms j`
given by `s j` on each component.
For the standard basis over `R` on the finite-dimensional space `η → R` see `Pi.basisFun`.
-/
protected noncomputable def basis (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) :
Basis (Σj, ιs j) R (∀ j, Ms j) :=
Basis.ofRepr
((LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun j => (s j).repr) ≪≫ₗ
(Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp R).symm)
@[simp]
theorem basis_repr_single [DecidableEq η] (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (j i) :
(Pi.basis s).repr (Pi.single j (s j i)) = Finsupp.single ⟨j, i⟩ 1 := by
classical
ext ⟨j', i'⟩
by_cases hj : j = j'
· subst hj
simp only [Pi.basis, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Basis.repr_self, Pi.single_eq_same,
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight, Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp_symm_apply,
Basis.repr_symm_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_mk, ne_eq, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
symm
simp [Finsupp.single_apply]
simp only [Pi.basis, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Finsupp.sigmaFinsuppLEquivPiFinsupp_symm_apply,
LinearEquiv.piCongrRight, coe_single]
dsimp
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm hj), LinearEquiv.map_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply,
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne]
rintro ⟨⟩
contradiction
@[simp]
theorem basis_apply [DecidableEq η] (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (ji) :
Pi.basis s ji = Pi.single ji.1 (s ji.1 ji.2) :=
Basis.apply_eq_iff.mpr (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem basis_repr (s : ∀ j, Basis (ιs j) R (Ms j)) (x) (ji) :
(Pi.basis s).repr x ji = (s ji.1).repr (x ji.1) ji.2 :=
rfl
end Fintype
section
variable [Finite η]
variable (R η)
/-- The basis on `η → R` where the `i`th basis vector is `Function.update 0 i 1`. -/
noncomputable def basisFun : Basis η R (η → R) :=
Basis.ofEquivFun (LinearEquiv.refl _ _)
@[simp]
theorem basisFun_apply [DecidableEq η] (i) :
basisFun R η i = Pi.single i 1 := by
simp only [basisFun, Basis.coe_ofEquivFun, LinearEquiv.refl_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
@[simp]
theorem basisFun_repr (x : η → R) (i : η) : (Pi.basisFun R η).repr x i = x i := by simp [basisFun]
@[simp]
theorem basisFun_equivFun : (Pi.basisFun R η).equivFun = LinearEquiv.refl _ _ :=
Basis.equivFun_ofEquivFun _
end
end Module
end Pi
/-- Let `k` be an integral domain and `G` an arbitrary finite set.
Then any algebra morphism `φ : (G → k) →ₐ[k] k` is an evaluation map. -/
lemma AlgHom.eq_piEvalAlgHom {k G : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [NoZeroDivisors k] [Nontrivial k]
[Finite G] (φ : (G → k) →ₐ[k] k) : ∃ (s : G), φ = Pi.evalAlgHom _ _ s := by
have h1 := map_one φ
classical
have := Fintype.ofFinite G
simp only [← Finset.univ_sum_single (1 : G → k), Pi.one_apply, map_sum] at h1
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ : ∃ (s : G), φ (Pi.single s 1) ≠ 0 := by
by_contra
simp_all
have h2 : ∀ t ≠ s, φ (Pi.single t 1) = 0 := by
refine fun _ _ ↦ (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero ?_).resolve_left hs
rw [← map_mul]
convert map_zero φ
ext u
by_cases u = s <;> simp_all
have h3 : φ (Pi.single s 1) = 1 := by
rwa [Fintype.sum_eq_single s h2] at h1
use s
refine AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective ((Pi.basisFun k G).ext fun t ↦ ?_)
by_cases t = s <;> simp_all
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-15")] alias eval_of_algHom := AlgHom.eq_piEvalAlgHom
namespace Module
variable (ι R M N : Type*) [Finite ι] [CommSemiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
/-- The natural linear equivalence: `Mⁱ ≃ Hom(Rⁱ, M)` for an `R`-module `M`. -/
noncomputable def piEquiv : (ι → M) ≃ₗ[R] ((ι → R) →ₗ[R] M) := Basis.constr (Pi.basisFun R ι) R
lemma piEquiv_apply_apply (ι R M : Type*) [Fintype ι] [CommSemiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (v : ι → M) (w : ι → R) :
piEquiv ι R M v w = ∑ i, w i • v i := by
simp only [piEquiv, Basis.constr_apply_fintype, Basis.equivFun_apply]
congr
@[simp] lemma range_piEquiv (v : ι → M) :
LinearMap.range (piEquiv ι R M v) = span R (range v) :=
Basis.constr_range _ _
@[simp] lemma surjective_piEquiv_apply_iff (v : ι → M) :
Surjective (piEquiv ι R M v) ↔ span R (range v) = ⊤ := by
rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, range_piEquiv]
end Module
namespace Module.Free
variable {ι : Type*} (R : Type*) (M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- The product of finitely many free modules is free. -/
instance _root_.Module.Free.pi (M : ι → Type*) [Finite ι] [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] : Module.Free R (∀ i, M i) :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype ι
.of_basis <| Pi.basis fun i => Module.Free.chooseBasis R (M i)
variable (ι) in
/-- The product of finitely many free modules is free (non-dependent version to help with typeclass
search). -/
instance _root_.Module.Free.function [Finite ι] [Module.Free R M] : Module.Free R (ι → M) :=
Free.pi _ _
end Module.Free
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/StdBasis.lean | 284 | 284 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, we then define `NormedLatticeAddCommGroup` as a
lattice with a covariant normed group addition satisfying the solid axiom.
## Main statements
We show that a normed lattice ordered group is a topological lattice with respect to the norm
topology.
## References
* [Meyer-Nieberg, Banach lattices][MeyerNieberg1991]
## Tags
normed, lattice, ordered, group
-/
/-!
### Normed lattice ordered groups
Motivated by the theory of Banach Lattices, this section introduces normed lattice ordered groups.
-/
section SolidNorm
/-- Let `α` be an `AddCommGroup` with a `Lattice` structure. A norm on `α` is *solid* if, for `a`
and `b` in `α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`.
-/
class HasSolidNorm (α : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] : Prop where
solid : ∀ ⦃x y : α⦄, |x| ≤ |y| → ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α]
theorem norm_le_norm_of_abs_le_abs {a b : α} (h : |a| ≤ |b|) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ :=
HasSolidNorm.solid h
/-- If `α` has a solid norm, then the balls centered at the origin of `α` are solid sets. -/
theorem LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.isSolid_ball (r : ℝ) :
LatticeOrderedAddCommGroup.IsSolid (Metric.ball (0 : α) r) := fun _ hx _ hxy =>
mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr ((HasSolidNorm.solid hxy).trans_lt (mem_ball_zero_iff.mp hx))
instance : HasSolidNorm ℝ := ⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : HasSolidNorm ℚ := ⟨fun _ _ _ => by simpa only [norm, ← Rat.cast_abs, Rat.cast_le]⟩
end SolidNorm
/--
Let `α` be a normed commutative group equipped with a partial order covariant with addition, with
respect which `α` forms a lattice. Suppose that `α` is *solid*, that is to say, for `a` and `b` in
`α`, with absolute values `|a|` and `|b|` respectively, `|a| ≤ |b|` implies `‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖`. Then `α` is
said to be a normed lattice ordered group.
-/
@[deprecated
"Use `[NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure NormedLatticeAddCommGroup (α : Type*) extends
NormedAddCommGroup α, Lattice α, HasSolidNorm α where
add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
instance Int.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℤ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Int.norm_cast_real, ← Int.cast_abs] using h
instance Rat.hasSolidNorm : HasSolidNorm ℚ where
solid x y h := by simpa [← Rat.norm_cast_real, ← Rat.cast_abs] using h
variable {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]
open HasSolidNorm
theorem dual_solid (a b : α) (h : b ⊓ -b ≤ a ⊓ -a) : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ := by
apply solid
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg a]
rw [← neg_inf]
rw [abs]
nth_rw 1 [← neg_neg b]
rwa [← neg_inf, neg_le_neg_iff, inf_comm _ b, inf_comm _ a]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group, then the order dual is also a
normed lattice ordered group.
-/
instance (priority := 100) OrderDual.instHasSolidNorm :
HasSolidNorm αᵒᵈ :=
{ solid := dual_solid (α := α) }
theorem norm_abs_eq_norm (a : α) : ‖|a|‖ = ‖a‖ :=
(solid (abs_abs a).le).antisymm (solid (abs_abs a).symm.le)
theorem norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| = |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b + (c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊓ b - c ⊓ b| + |c ⊓ b - c ⊓ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [inf_comm c, inf_comm c]
exact abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_sup_sub_sup_le_add_norm (a b c d : α) : ‖a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d‖ ≤ ‖a - c‖ + ‖b - d‖ := by
rw [← norm_abs_eq_norm (a - c), ← norm_abs_eq_norm (b - d)]
refine le_trans (solid ?_) (norm_add_le |a - c| |b - d|)
rw [abs_of_nonneg (add_nonneg (abs_nonneg (a - c)) (abs_nonneg (b - d)))]
calc
|a ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| = |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b + (c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d)| := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ |a ⊔ b - c ⊔ b| + |c ⊔ b - c ⊔ d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ |a - c| + |b - d| := by
apply add_le_add
· exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
· rw [sup_comm c, sup_comm c]
exact abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs _ _ _
theorem norm_inf_le_add (x y : α) : ‖x ⊓ y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
have h : ‖x ⊓ y - 0 ⊓ 0‖ ≤ ‖x - 0‖ + ‖y - 0‖ := norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm x y 0 0
simpa only [inf_idem, sub_zero] using h
theorem norm_sup_le_add (x y : α) : ‖x ⊔ y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
have h : ‖x ⊔ y - 0 ⊔ 0‖ ≤ ‖x - 0‖ + ‖y - 0‖ := norm_sup_sub_sup_le_add_norm x y 0 0
simpa only [sup_idem, sub_zero] using h
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group. Then the infimum is jointly continuous.
-/
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.continuousInf : ContinuousInf α := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun q => tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero.2 <| ?_⟩
have : ∀ p : α × α, ‖p.1 ⊓ p.2 - q.1 ⊓ q.2‖ ≤ ‖p.1 - q.1‖ + ‖p.2 - q.2‖ := fun _ =>
norm_inf_sub_inf_le_add_norm _ _ _ _
refine squeeze_zero (fun e => norm_nonneg _) this ?_
convert ((continuous_fst.tendsto q).sub <| tendsto_const_nhds).norm.add
((continuous_snd.tendsto q).sub <| tendsto_const_nhds).norm
simp
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.continuousSup {α : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup α] [Lattice α] [HasSolidNorm α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] : ContinuousSup α :=
OrderDual.continuousSup αᵒᵈ
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/--
Let `α` be a normed lattice ordered group. Then `α` is a topological lattice in the norm topology.
-/
instance (priority := 100) HasSolidNorm.toTopologicalLattice : TopologicalLattice α :=
TopologicalLattice.mk
theorem norm_abs_sub_abs (a b : α) : ‖|a| - |b|‖ ≤ ‖a - b‖ := solid (abs_abs_sub_abs_le _ _)
theorem norm_sup_sub_sup_le_norm (x y z : α) : ‖x ⊔ z - y ⊔ z‖ ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
solid (abs_sup_sub_sup_le_abs x y z)
theorem norm_inf_sub_inf_le_norm (x y z : α) : ‖x ⊓ z - y ⊓ z‖ ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
solid (abs_inf_sub_inf_le_abs x y z)
theorem lipschitzWith_sup_right (z : α) : LipschitzWith 1 fun x => x ⊔ z :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
exact norm_sup_sub_sup_le_norm x y z
lemma lipschitzWith_posPart : LipschitzWith 1 (posPart : α → α) :=
lipschitzWith_sup_right 0
lemma lipschitzWith_negPart : LipschitzWith 1 (negPart : α → α) := by
simpa [Function.comp] using lipschitzWith_posPart.comp LipschitzWith.id.neg
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_posPart : Continuous (posPart : α → α) := lipschitzWith_posPart.continuous
@[fun_prop]
lemma continuous_negPart : Continuous (negPart : α → α) := lipschitzWith_negPart.continuous
lemma isClosed_nonneg : IsClosed {x : α | 0 ≤ x} := by
have : {x : α | 0 ≤ x} = negPart ⁻¹' {0} := by ext; simp [negPart_eq_zero]
rw [this]
exact isClosed_singleton.preimage continuous_negPart
theorem isClosed_le_of_isClosed_nonneg {G}
[AddCommGroup G] [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousSub G] (h : IsClosed { x : G | 0 ≤ x }) :
| IsClosed { p : G × G | p.fst ≤ p.snd } := by
have : { p : G × G | p.fst ≤ p.snd } = (fun p : G × G => p.snd - p.fst) ⁻¹' { x : G | 0 ≤ x } :=
by ext1 p; simp only [sub_nonneg, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
rw [this]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/Lattice.lean | 196 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Fibration
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.OpenQuotient
/-!
# Inseparable points in a topological space
In this file we prove basic properties of the following notions defined elsewhere.
* `Specializes` (notation: `x ⤳ y`) : a relation saying that `𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y`;
* `Inseparable`: a relation saying that two points in a topological space have the same
neighbourhoods; equivalently, they can't be separated by an open set;
* `InseparableSetoid X`: same relation, as a `Setoid`;
* `SeparationQuotient X`: the quotient of `X` by its `InseparableSetoid`.
We also prove various basic properties of the relation `Inseparable`.
## Notations
- `x ⤳ y`: notation for `Specializes x y`;
- `x ~ᵢ y` is used as a local notation for `Inseparable x y`;
- `𝓝 x` is the neighbourhoods filter `nhds x` of a point `x`, defined elsewhere.
## Tags
topological space, separation setoid
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology List
variable {X Y Z α ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TopologicalSpace Z] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {x y z : X} {s : Set X} {f g : X → Y}
/-!
### `Specializes` relation
-/
/-- A collection of equivalent definitions of `x ⤳ y`. The public API is given by `iff` lemmas
below. -/
theorem specializes_TFAE (x y : X) :
TFAE [x ⤳ y,
pure x ≤ 𝓝 y,
∀ s : Set X , IsOpen s → y ∈ s → x ∈ s,
∀ s : Set X , IsClosed s → x ∈ s → y ∈ s,
y ∈ closure ({ x } : Set X),
closure ({ y } : Set X) ⊆ closure { x },
ClusterPt y (pure x)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := (pure_le_nhds _).trans
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h s hso hy => h (hso.mem_nhds hy)
tfae_have 3 → 4 := fun h s hsc hx => of_not_not fun hy => h sᶜ hsc.isOpen_compl hy hx
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun h => h _ isClosed_closure (subset_closure <| mem_singleton _)
tfae_have 6 ↔ 5 := isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff.trans singleton_subset_iff
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7 := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_clusterPt, principal_singleton]
tfae_have 5 → 1 := by
refine fun h => (nhds_basis_opens _).ge_iff.2 ?_
rintro s ⟨hy, ho⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 h s ho hy with ⟨z, hxs, rfl : z = x⟩
exact ho.mem_nhds hxs
tfae_finish
theorem specializes_iff_nhds : x ⤳ y ↔ 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Specializes.not_disjoint (h : x ⤳ y) : ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := fun hd ↦
absurd (hd.mono_right h) <| by simp [NeBot.ne']
theorem specializes_iff_pure : x ⤳ y ↔ pure x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 1
alias ⟨Specializes.nhds_le_nhds, _⟩ := specializes_iff_nhds
alias ⟨Specializes.pure_le_nhds, _⟩ := specializes_iff_pure
theorem ker_nhds_eq_specializes : (𝓝 x).ker = {y | y ⤳ x} := by
ext; simp [specializes_iff_pure, le_def]
theorem specializes_iff_forall_open : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsOpen s → y ∈ s → x ∈ s :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 2
theorem Specializes.mem_open (h : x ⤳ y) (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
specializes_iff_forall_open.1 h s hs hy
theorem IsOpen.not_specializes (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : ¬x ⤳ y := fun h =>
hx <| h.mem_open hs hy
theorem specializes_iff_forall_closed : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → x ∈ s → y ∈ s :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 3
theorem Specializes.mem_closed (h : x ⤳ y) (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∈ s) : y ∈ s :=
specializes_iff_forall_closed.1 h s hs hx
theorem IsClosed.not_specializes (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) : ¬x ⤳ y := fun h =>
hy <| h.mem_closed hs hx
theorem specializes_iff_mem_closure : x ⤳ y ↔ y ∈ closure ({x} : Set X) :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 4
alias ⟨Specializes.mem_closure, _⟩ := specializes_iff_mem_closure
theorem specializes_iff_closure_subset : x ⤳ y ↔ closure ({y} : Set X) ⊆ closure {x} :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 5
alias ⟨Specializes.closure_subset, _⟩ := specializes_iff_closure_subset
theorem specializes_iff_clusterPt : x ⤳ y ↔ ClusterPt y (pure x) :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 6
theorem Filter.HasBasis.specializes_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : (𝓝 y).HasBasis p s) : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ i, p i → x ∈ s i :=
specializes_iff_pure.trans h.ge_iff
theorem specializes_rfl : x ⤳ x := le_rfl
@[refl]
theorem specializes_refl (x : X) : x ⤳ x :=
specializes_rfl
@[trans]
theorem Specializes.trans : x ⤳ y → y ⤳ z → x ⤳ z :=
le_trans
theorem specializes_of_eq (e : x = y) : x ⤳ y :=
e ▸ specializes_refl x
alias Specializes.of_eq := specializes_of_eq
theorem specializes_of_nhdsWithin (h₁ : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[s] y) (h₂ : x ∈ s) : x ⤳ y :=
specializes_iff_pure.2 <|
calc
pure x ≤ 𝓝[s] x := le_inf (pure_le_nhds _) (le_principal_iff.2 h₂)
_ ≤ 𝓝[s] y := h₁
_ ≤ 𝓝 y := inf_le_left
theorem Specializes.map_of_continuousAt (h : x ⤳ y) (hy : ContinuousAt f y) : f x ⤳ f y :=
specializes_iff_pure.2 fun _s hs =>
mem_pure.2 <| mem_preimage.1 <| mem_of_mem_nhds <| hy.mono_left h hs
theorem Specializes.map (h : x ⤳ y) (hf : Continuous f) : f x ⤳ f y :=
h.map_of_continuousAt hf.continuousAt
theorem Topology.IsInducing.specializes_iff (hf : IsInducing f) : f x ⤳ f y ↔ x ⤳ y := by
simp only [specializes_iff_mem_closure, hf.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, image_singleton,
mem_preimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.specializes_iff := IsInducing.specializes_iff
theorem subtype_specializes_iff {p : X → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : x ⤳ y ↔ (x : X) ⤳ y :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.specializes_iff.symm
@[simp]
theorem specializes_prod {x₁ x₂ : X} {y₁ y₂ : Y} : (x₁, y₁) ⤳ (x₂, y₂) ↔ x₁ ⤳ x₂ ∧ y₁ ⤳ y₂ := by
simp only [Specializes, nhds_prod_eq, prod_le_prod]
theorem Specializes.prod {x₁ x₂ : X} {y₁ y₂ : Y} (hx : x₁ ⤳ x₂) (hy : y₁ ⤳ y₂) :
(x₁, y₁) ⤳ (x₂, y₂) :=
specializes_prod.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem Specializes.fst {a b : X × Y} (h : a ⤳ b) : a.1 ⤳ b.1 := (specializes_prod.1 h).1
theorem Specializes.snd {a b : X × Y} (h : a ⤳ b) : a.2 ⤳ b.2 := (specializes_prod.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem specializes_pi {f g : ∀ i, π i} : f ⤳ g ↔ ∀ i, f i ⤳ g i := by
simp only [Specializes, nhds_pi, pi_le_pi]
theorem not_specializes_iff_exists_open : ¬x ⤳ y ↔ ∃ S : Set X, IsOpen S ∧ y ∈ S ∧ x ∉ S := by
rw [specializes_iff_forall_open]
push_neg
rfl
theorem not_specializes_iff_exists_closed : ¬x ⤳ y ↔ ∃ S : Set X, IsClosed S ∧ x ∈ S ∧ y ∉ S := by
rw [specializes_iff_forall_closed]
push_neg
rfl
theorem IsOpen.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : IsOpen s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hspec : ∀ x, f x ⤳ g x) :
Continuous (s.piecewise f g) := by
have : ∀ U, IsOpen U → g ⁻¹' U ⊆ f ⁻¹' U := fun U hU x hx ↦ (hspec x).mem_open hU hx
rw [continuous_def]
intro U hU
rw [piecewise_preimage, ite_eq_of_subset_right _ (this U hU)]
exact hU.preimage hf |>.inter hs |>.union (hU.preimage hg)
theorem IsClosed.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hspec : ∀ x, g x ⤳ f x) :
Continuous (s.piecewise f g) := by
simpa only [piecewise_compl] using hs.isOpen_compl.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes hg hf hspec
attribute [local instance] specializationPreorder
/-- A continuous function is monotone with respect to the specialization preorders on the domain and
the codomain. -/
theorem Continuous.specialization_monotone (hf : Continuous f) : Monotone f :=
fun _ _ h => h.map hf
lemma closure_singleton_eq_Iic (x : X) : closure {x} = Iic x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ specializes_iff_mem_closure.symm
/-- A subset `S` of a topological space is stable under specialization
if `x ∈ S → y ∈ S` for all `x ⤳ y`. -/
def StableUnderSpecialization (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ⤳ y → x ∈ s → y ∈ s
/-- A subset `S` of a topological space is stable under specialization
if `x ∈ S → y ∈ S` for all `y ⤳ x`. -/
def StableUnderGeneralization (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, y ⤳ x → x ∈ s → y ∈ s
example {s : Set X} : StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ IsLowerSet s := Iff.rfl
example {s : Set X} : StableUnderGeneralization s ↔ IsUpperSet s := Iff.rfl
lemma IsClosed.stableUnderSpecialization {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
StableUnderSpecialization s :=
fun _ _ e ↦ e.mem_closed hs
lemma IsOpen.stableUnderGeneralization {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
StableUnderGeneralization s :=
fun _ _ e ↦ e.mem_open hs
@[simp]
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization sᶜ ↔ StableUnderGeneralization s :=
isLowerSet_compl
@[simp]
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_compl_iff {s : Set X} :
StableUnderGeneralization sᶜ ↔ StableUnderSpecialization s :=
isUpperSet_compl
alias ⟨_, StableUnderGeneralization.compl⟩ := stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, StableUnderSpecialization.compl⟩ := stableUnderGeneralization_compl_iff
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_univ : StableUnderSpecialization (univ : Set X) := isLowerSet_univ
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_empty : StableUnderSpecialization (∅ : Set X) := isLowerSet_empty
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_univ : StableUnderGeneralization (univ : Set X) := isUpperSet_univ
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_empty : StableUnderGeneralization (∅ : Set X) := isUpperSet_empty
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_sUnion (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋃₀ S) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_sInter (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋂₀ S) :=
isLowerSet_sInter H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_sUnion (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋃₀ S) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_sInter (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋂₀ S) :=
isUpperSet_sInter H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderSpecialization (S i)) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋃ i, S i) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iInter {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderSpecialization (S i)) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋂ i, S i) :=
isLowerSet_iInter H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderGeneralization (S i)) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋃ i, S i) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iInter {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderGeneralization (S i)) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋂ i, S i) :=
isUpperSet_iInter H
lemma Union_closure_singleton_eq_iff {s : Set X} :
(⋃ x ∈ s, closure {x}) = s ↔ StableUnderSpecialization s :=
show _ ↔ IsLowerSet s by simp only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic, ← lowerClosure_eq, coe_lowerClosure]
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iff_Union_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ (⋃ x ∈ s, closure {x}) = s :=
Union_closure_singleton_eq_iff.symm
alias ⟨StableUnderSpecialization.Union_eq, _⟩ := stableUnderSpecialization_iff_Union_eq
/-- A set is stable under specialization iff it is a union of closed sets. -/
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iff_exists_sUnion_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ ∃ (S : Set (Set X)), (∀ s ∈ S, IsClosed s) ∧ ⋃₀ S = s := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨(fun x : X ↦ closure {x}) '' s, ?_, ?_⟩, fun ⟨S, hS, e⟩ ↦ e ▸
stableUnderSpecialization_sUnion S (fun x hx ↦ (hS x hx).stableUnderSpecialization)⟩
· rintro _ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩; exact isClosed_closure
· conv_rhs => rw [← H.Union_eq]
simp
/-- A set is stable under generalization iff it is an intersection of open sets. -/
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iff_exists_sInter_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderGeneralization s ↔ ∃ (S : Set (Set X)), (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) ∧ ⋂₀ S = s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨S, hS, e⟩ ↦ e ▸
stableUnderGeneralization_sInter S (fun x hx ↦ (hS x hx).stableUnderGeneralization)⟩
rw [← stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff, stableUnderSpecialization_iff_exists_sUnion_eq]
exact fun ⟨S, h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨(·ᶜ) '' S, fun s ⟨t, ht, e⟩ ↦ e ▸ (h₁ t ht).isOpen_compl,
compl_injective ((sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl S).symm.trans h₂)⟩
lemma StableUnderSpecialization.preimage {s : Set Y}
(hs : StableUnderSpecialization s) (hf : Continuous f) :
StableUnderSpecialization (f ⁻¹' s) :=
IsLowerSet.preimage hs hf.specialization_monotone
lemma StableUnderGeneralization.preimage {s : Set Y}
(hs : StableUnderGeneralization s) (hf : Continuous f) :
StableUnderGeneralization (f ⁻¹' s) :=
IsUpperSet.preimage hs hf.specialization_monotone
/-- A map `f` between topological spaces is specializing if specializations lifts along `f`,
i.e. for each `f x' ⤳ y` there is some `x` with `x' ⤳ x` whose image is `y`. -/
def SpecializingMap (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
Relation.Fibration (flip (· ⤳ ·)) (flip (· ⤳ ·)) f
/-- A map `f` between topological spaces is generalizing if generalizations lifts along `f`,
i.e. for each `y ⤳ f x'` there is some `x ⤳ x'` whose image is `y`. -/
def GeneralizingMap (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
Relation.Fibration (· ⤳ ·) (· ⤳ ·) f
lemma specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton_subset :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, closure {f x} ⊆ f '' closure {x} := by
simp only [SpecializingMap, Relation.Fibration, flip, specializes_iff_mem_closure]; rfl
alias ⟨SpecializingMap.closure_singleton_subset, _⟩ := specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton_subset
lemma SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_image (hf : SpecializingMap f)
{s : Set X} (hs : StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (f '' s) :=
IsLowerSet.image_fibration hf hs
alias StableUnderSpecialization.image := SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_image
lemma specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, StableUnderSpecialization (f '' closure {x}) := by
simpa only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic] using Relation.fibration_iff_isLowerSet_image_Iic
lemma specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ s, StableUnderSpecialization s → StableUnderSpecialization (f '' s) :=
Relation.fibration_iff_isLowerSet_image
lemma specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton (hf : Continuous f) :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, f '' closure {x} = closure {f x} := by
simpa only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic] using
Relation.fibration_iff_image_Iic hf.specialization_monotone
lemma specializingMap_iff_isClosed_image_closure_singleton (hf : Continuous f) :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, IsClosed (f '' closure {x}) := by
refine ⟨fun h x ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton.mpr
(fun x ↦ (h x).stableUnderSpecialization)⟩
rw [(specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton hf).mp h x]
exact isClosed_closure
lemma SpecializingMap.comp {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
(hf : SpecializingMap f) (hg : SpecializingMap g) :
SpecializingMap (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image, Set.image_comp] at *
exact fun s h ↦ hg _ (hf _ h)
lemma IsClosedMap.specializingMap (hf : IsClosedMap f) : SpecializingMap f :=
specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton.mpr <|
fun _ ↦ (hf _ isClosed_closure).stableUnderSpecialization
lemma Topology.IsInducing.specializingMap (hf : IsInducing f)
(h : StableUnderSpecialization (range f)) : SpecializingMap f := by
intros x y e
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h e ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.specializes_iff.mp e, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.specializingMap := IsInducing.specializingMap
lemma Topology.IsInducing.generalizingMap (hf : IsInducing f)
(h : StableUnderGeneralization (range f)) : GeneralizingMap f := by
intros x y e
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h e ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.specializes_iff.mp e, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.generalizingMap := IsInducing.generalizingMap
lemma IsOpenEmbedding.generalizingMap (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : GeneralizingMap f :=
hf.isInducing.generalizingMap hf.isOpen_range.stableUnderGeneralization
lemma SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_range (h : SpecializingMap f) :
StableUnderSpecialization (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ stableUnderSpecialization_univ.image h
lemma GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_image (hf : GeneralizingMap f) {s : Set X}
(hs : StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (f '' s) :=
IsUpperSet.image_fibration hf hs
lemma GeneralizingMap_iff_stableUnderGeneralization_image :
GeneralizingMap f ↔ ∀ s, StableUnderGeneralization s → StableUnderGeneralization (f '' s) :=
Relation.fibration_iff_isUpperSet_image
alias StableUnderGeneralization.image := GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_image
lemma GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_range (h : GeneralizingMap f) :
StableUnderGeneralization (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ stableUnderGeneralization_univ.image h
lemma GeneralizingMap.comp {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
(hf : GeneralizingMap f) (hg : GeneralizingMap g) :
GeneralizingMap (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [GeneralizingMap_iff_stableUnderGeneralization_image, Set.image_comp] at *
exact fun s h ↦ hg _ (hf _ h)
/-!
### `Inseparable` relation
-/
local infixl:0 " ~ᵢ " => Inseparable
theorem inseparable_def : (x ~ᵢ y) ↔ 𝓝 x = 𝓝 y :=
Iff.rfl
|
theorem inseparable_iff_specializes_and : (x ~ᵢ y) ↔ x ⤳ y ∧ y ⤳ x :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Inseparable.lean | 423 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohanad ahmed. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-! # Block Matrices from Rows and Columns
This file provides the basic definitions of matrices composed from columns and rows.
The concatenation of two matrices with the same row indices can be expressed as
`A = fromCols A₁ A₂` the concatenation of two matrices with the same column indices
can be expressed as `B = fromRows B₁ B₂`.
We then provide a few lemmas that deal with the products of these with each other and
with block matrices
## Tags
column matrices, row matrices, column row block matrices
-/
namespace Matrix
variable {R : Type*}
variable {m m₁ m₂ n n₁ n₂ : Type*}
/-- Concatenate together two matrices A₁[m₁ × N] and A₂[m₂ × N] with the same columns (N) to get a
bigger matrix indexed by [(m₁ ⊕ m₂) × N] -/
def fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R :=
of (Sum.elim A₁ A₂)
/-- Concatenate together two matrices B₁[m × n₁] and B₂[m × n₂] with the same rows (M) to get a
bigger matrix indexed by [m × (n₁ ⊕ n₂)] -/
def fromCols (B₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (B₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R :=
of fun i => Sum.elim (B₁ i) (B₂ i)
/-- Given a column partitioned matrix extract the first column -/
def toCols₁ (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) : Matrix m n₁ R := of fun i j => (A i (Sum.inl j))
/-- Given a column partitioned matrix extract the second column -/
def toCols₂ (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) : Matrix m n₂ R := of fun i j => (A i (Sum.inr j))
/-- Given a row partitioned matrix extract the first row -/
def toRows₁ (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) : Matrix m₁ n R := of fun i j => (A (Sum.inl i) j)
/-- Given a row partitioned matrix extract the second row -/
def toRows₂ (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) : Matrix m₂ n R := of fun i j => (A (Sum.inr i) j)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns := fromCols
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁ := toCols₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₂ := toCols₂
@[simp]
lemma fromRows_apply_inl (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) (i : m₁) (j : n) :
(fromRows A₁ A₂) (Sum.inl i) j = A₁ i j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma fromRows_apply_inr (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) (i : m₂) (j : n) :
(fromRows A₁ A₂) (Sum.inr i) j = A₂ i j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma fromCols_apply_inl (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) (i : m) (j : n₁) :
(fromCols A₁ A₂) i (Sum.inl j) = A₁ i j := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_apply_inl := fromCols_apply_inl
@[simp]
lemma fromCols_apply_inr (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) (i : m) (j : n₂) :
(fromCols A₁ A₂) i (Sum.inr j) = A₂ i j := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_apply_inr := fromCols_apply_inr
@[simp]
lemma toRows₁_apply (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) (i : m₁) (j : n) :
(toRows₁ A) i j = A (Sum.inl i) j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₂_apply (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) (i : m₂) (j : n) :
(toRows₂ A) i j = A (Sum.inr i) j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₁_fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) :
toRows₁ (fromRows A₁ A₂) = A₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toRows₂_fromRows (A₁ : Matrix m₁ n R) (A₂ : Matrix m₂ n R) :
toRows₂ (fromRows A₁ A₂) = A₂ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toCols₁_apply (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) (i : m) (j : n₁) :
(toCols₁ A) i j = A i (Sum.inl j) := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁_apply := toCols₁_apply
@[simp]
lemma toCols₂_apply (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) (i : m) (j : n₂) :
(toCols₂ A) i j = A i (Sum.inr j) := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₂_apply := toCols₂_apply
@[simp]
lemma toCols₁_fromCols (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) :
toCols₁ (fromCols A₁ A₂) = A₁ := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₁_fromColumns := toCols₁_fromCols
@[simp]
lemma toCols₂_fromCols (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) :
toCols₂ (fromCols A₁ A₂) = A₂ := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias toColumns₂_fromColumns := toCols₂_fromCols
@[simp]
lemma fromCols_toCols (A : Matrix m (n₁ ⊕ n₂) R) :
fromCols A.toCols₁ A.toCols₂ = A := by
ext i (j | j) <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_toColumns := fromCols_toCols
@[simp]
lemma fromRows_toRows (A : Matrix (m₁ ⊕ m₂) n R) : fromRows A.toRows₁ A.toRows₂ = A := by
ext (i | i) j <;> simp
lemma fromRows_inj : Function.Injective2 (@fromRows R m₁ m₂ n) := by
intros x1 x2 y1 y2
simp [← Matrix.ext_iff]
lemma fromCols_inj : Function.Injective2 (@fromCols R m n₁ n₂) := by
intros x1 x2 y1 y2
simp only [funext_iff, ← Matrix.ext_iff]
aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_inj := fromCols_inj
| lemma fromCols_ext_iff (A₁ : Matrix m n₁ R) (A₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) (B₁ : Matrix m n₁ R)
(B₂ : Matrix m n₂ R) :
fromCols A₁ A₂ = fromCols B₁ B₂ ↔ A₁ = B₁ ∧ A₂ = B₂ := fromCols_inj.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias fromColumns_ext_iff := fromCols_ext_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/ColumnRowPartitioned.lean | 137 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# Open immersions of structured spaces
We say that a morphism of presheafed spaces `f : X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion if
the underlying map of spaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y`,
and the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
Abbreviations are also provided for `SheafedSpace`, `LocallyRingedSpace` and `Scheme`.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a PresheafedSpace hom `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion`: the `Prop`-valued typeclass asserting
that a Scheme morphism `f` is an open_immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict`: The source of an
open immersion is isomorphic to the restriction of the target onto the image.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.lift`: Any morphism whose range is
contained in an open immersion factors though the open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is an
open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a sheafed space, then `X` is also a sheafed
space. The morphism as morphisms of sheafed spaces is given by `toSheafedSpaceHom`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toLocallyRingedSpace`: If `f : X ⟶ Y` is
an open immersion of presheafed spaces, and `Y` is a locally ringed space, then `X` is also a
locally ringed space. The morphism as morphisms of locally ringed spaces is given by
`toLocallyRingedSpaceHom`.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp`: The composition of two open
immersions is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso`: An iso is an open immersion.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso`:
A surjective open immersion is an isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso`: An open immersion induces
an isomorphism on stalks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.hasPullback_of_left`: If `f` is an open
immersion, then the pullback `(f, g)` exists (and the forgetful functor to `TopCat` preserves it).
* `AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackSndOfLeft`: Open immersions
are stable under pullbacks.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso` An (topological) open embedding
between two sheafed spaces is an open immersion if all the stalk maps are isomorphisms.
-/
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe w v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An open immersion of PresheafedSpaces is an open embedding `f : X ⟶ U ⊆ Y` of the underlying
spaces, such that the sheaf map `Y(V) ⟶ f _* X(V)` is an iso for each `V ⊆ U`.
-/
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- the underlying continuous map of underlying spaces from the source to an open subset of the
target. -/
base_open : IsOpenEmbedding f.base
/-- the underlying sheaf morphism is an isomorphism on each open subset -/
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
/-- A morphism of SheafedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of PresheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
/-- A morphism of LocallyRingedSpaces is an open immersion if it is an open immersion as a morphism
of SheafedSpaces
-/
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective]
rfl
· intro U V i
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, Category.assoc]
rw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
instance mono : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
lemma c_iso' {V : Opens Y} (U : Opens X) (h : V = (opensFunctor f).obj U) :
IsIso (f.c.app (Opposite.op V)) := by
subst h
infer_instance
/-- The composition of two open immersions is an open immersion. -/
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [hg : IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp H.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
Opens.map_comp_obj]
apply IsIso.comp_isIso'
· exact c_iso' g ((opensFunctor f).obj U) (by ext; simp)
· apply c_iso' f U
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.coe_functor_obj, comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp]
rw [Set.image_comp, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.injective]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)))
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
invApp f (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
simp only [Functor.op_obj, op_unop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, Functor.op_map, Category.assoc,
NatTrans.naturality, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map]
congr 1
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (invApp f U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp _ U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
invApp f U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
/-- An isomorphism is an open immersion. -/
instance ofIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (H : X ≅ Y) : IsOpenImmersion H.hom where
base_open := (TopCat.homeoOfIso ((forget C).mapIso H)).isOpenEmbedding
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` will fail if Lean is not told that `H.hom.c` is iso
c_iso _ := letI : IsIso H.hom.c := c_isIso_of_iso H.hom; inferInstance
instance (priority := 100) ofIsIso {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsOpenImmersion f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIso (asIso f)
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : PresheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) where
base_open := hf
c_iso U := by
dsimp
have : (Opens.map f).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) = U := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective
convert_to IsIso (Y.presheaf.map (𝟙 _))
· congr
· -- Porting note: was `apply Subsingleton.helim; rw [this]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
congr
· simp only [unop_op]
congr
apply Subsingleton.helim
rw [this]
· infer_instance
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : PresheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ := by
delta invApp
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
change X.presheaf.map _ = X.presheaf.map _
congr 1
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
have : ∀ (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ), IsIso (f.c.app U) := by
intro U
have : U = op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj (unop U))) := by
induction U with | op U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq _ ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')).symm
convert H.c_iso (Opens.map f.base |>.obj <| unop U)
have : IsIso f.c := NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app _
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true }) isIso_of_components
let t : X ≃ₜ Y := H.base_open.isEmbedding.toHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := Subtype.val
invFun := fun x =>
⟨x, by rw [Set.range_eq_univ.mpr ((TopCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h')]; trivial⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl }
exact (TopCat.isoOfHomeo t).isIso_hom
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
infer_instance
end
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- (Implementation.) The projection map when constructing the pullback along an open immersion.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftFst :
Y.restrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base) ⟶ X where
base := pullback.fst _ _
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
hf.invApp _ (unop U) ≫
g.c.app (op (hf.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj (unop U))) ≫
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
simp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, unop_op, op_inj_iff, Opens.map,
Subtype.coe_mk, Functor.op_obj]
apply LE.le.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype _ _).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h₂⟩
-- Porting note: need a slight hand holding
-- used to be `simpa using h₁` before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
change _ ∈ _ ⁻¹' _ ∧ _
simp only [TopCat.coe_of, restrict_carrier, Set.preimage_id', Set.mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· change _ ∈ U.unop at h₁
convert h₁
rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
· rw [TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
· rintro _ ⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, h₁, CategoryTheory.congr_fun pullback.condition x⟩))
naturality := by
intro U V i
induction U
induction V
-- Note: this doesn't fire in `simp` because of reduction of the term via structure eta
-- before discrimination tree key generation
rw [inv_naturality_assoc]
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_obj_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
rfl }
theorem pullback_cone_of_left_condition : pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ ≫ g := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun U => ?_
· simpa using pullback.condition
· induction U
-- Porting note: `NatTrans.comp_app` is not picked up by `dsimp`
-- Perhaps see : https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op, whiskerRight_app, pullbackConeOfLeftFst]
-- simp only [ofRestrict_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
simp only [app_invApp_assoc,
eqToHom_app, Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
erw [← Y.presheaf.map_comp, ← Y.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
/-- We construct the pullback along an open immersion via restricting along the pullback of the
maps of underlying spaces (which is also an open embedding).
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackConeOfLeftFst f g) (Y.ofRestrict _)
(pullback_cone_of_left_condition f g)
variable (s : PullbackCone f g)
/-- (Implementation.) Any cone over `cospan f g` indeed factors through the constructed cone.
-/
def pullbackConeOfLeftLift : s.pt ⟶ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).pt where
base :=
pullback.lift s.fst.base s.snd.base
(congr_arg (fun x => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base x) s.condition)
c :=
{ app := fun U =>
s.snd.c.app _ ≫
s.pt.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
dsimp only [Opens.map, IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op]
congr 2
let s' : PullbackCone f.base g.base := PullbackCone.mk s.fst.base s.snd.base
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this is just an underscore
(congr_arg Hom.base s.condition)
have : _ = s.snd.base := limit.lift_π s' WalkingCospan.right
conv_lhs =>
rw [← this]
dsimp [s']
rw [Function.comp_def, ← Set.preimage_preimage]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _
(TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left hf.base_open g.base).injective]
rfl))
naturality := fun U V i => by
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1 }
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).fst = s.fst := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = _
simp
· induction x with | op x => ?_
change ((_ ≫ _) ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
have := congr_app s.condition (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj x))
dsimp only [comp_c_app, unop_op] at this
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
replace this := reassoc_of% this
erw [← this, hf.invApp_app_assoc, s.fst.c.naturality_assoc]
simp [eqToHom_map]
-- this lemma is not a `simp` lemma, because it is an implementation detail
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd :
pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s ≫ (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd = s.snd := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ ?_ <| NatTrans.ext <| funext fun x => ?_
· change pullback.lift _ _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = _
simp
· change (_ ≫ _ ≫ _) ≫ _ = _
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
erw [s.snd.c.naturality_assoc]
erw [← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp, ← s.pt.presheaf.map_comp]
trans s.snd.c.app x ≫ s.pt.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· simp
instance pullbackConeSndIsOpenImmersion : IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd := by
erw [CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd]
infer_instance
/-- The constructed pullback cone is indeed the pullback. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f g s
use pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s
intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans (pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f g s).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackSndOfLeft : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullbackFstOfRight : IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullbackToBaseIsOpenImmersion [IsOpenImmersion g] :
IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfLeft : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (forget C) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g)
(by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan _) _).toFun
refine (IsLimit.equivIsoLimit ?_).toFun (limit.isLimit (cospan f.base g.base))
fapply Cones.ext
· exact Iso.refl _
change ∀ j, _ = 𝟙 _ ≫ _ ≫ _
simp_rw [Category.id_comp]
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> symm
· erw [Category.comp_id]
exact limit.w (cospan f.base g.base) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
· exact Category.comp_id _
· exact Category.comp_id _)
instance forget_preservesLimitsOfRight : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry (forget C) f g
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
haveI := TopCat.snd_iso_of_left_embedding_range_subset hf.base_open.isEmbedding g.base H
have : IsIso (pullback.snd f g).base := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
change IsIso (_ ≫ pullback.snd _ _)
infer_instance
apply to_iso
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
haveI := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
/-- Two open immersions with equal range is isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfRangeEq [IsOpenImmersion g] (e : Set.range f.base = Set.range g.base) : X ≅ Y where
hom := lift g f (le_of_eq e)
inv := lift f g (le_of_eq e.symm)
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cancel_mono f]; simp
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cancel_mono g]; simp
end Pullback
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
section ToSheafedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace C} (Y : SheafedSpace C)
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toSheafedSpace (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : SheafedSpace C where
IsSheaf := by
apply TopCat.Presheaf.isSheaf_of_iso (sheafIsoOfIso (isoRestrict f).symm).symm
apply TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf
exact (Y.restrict H.base_open).IsSheaf
toPresheafedSpace := X
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpace_toPresheafedSpace : (toSheafedSpace Y f).toPresheafedSpace = X :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a SheafedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of SheafedSpaces.
-/
def toSheafedSpaceHom : toSheafedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_base : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).base = f.base :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSheafedSpaceHom_c : (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f).c = f.c :=
rfl
instance toSheafedSpace_isOpenImmersion : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toSheafedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem sheafedSpace_toSheafedSpace {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion f] :
toSheafedSpace Y f = X := by cases X; rfl
end ToSheafedSpace
section ToLocallyRingedSpace
variable {X : PresheafedSpace CommRingCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace)
variable (f : X ⟶ Y.toPresheafedSpace) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, then so is `X`. -/
def toLocallyRingedSpace : LocallyRingedSpace where
toSheafedSpace := toSheafedSpace Y.toSheafedSpace f
isLocalRing x :=
haveI : IsLocalRing (Y.presheaf.stalk (f.base x)) := Y.isLocalRing _
(asIso (f.stalkMap x)).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.isLocalRing
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpace_toSheafedSpace :
(toLocallyRingedSpace Y f).toSheafedSpace = toSheafedSpace Y.1 f :=
rfl
/-- If `X ⟶ Y` is an open immersion of PresheafedSpaces, and `Y` is a LocallyRingedSpace, we can
upgrade it into a morphism of LocallyRingedSpace.
-/
def toLocallyRingedSpaceHom : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f ⟶ Y :=
⟨f, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
theorem toLocallyRingedSpaceHom_val : (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f).toShHom = f :=
rfl
instance toLocallyRingedSpace_isOpenImmersion :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (toLocallyRingedSpaceHom Y f) :=
H
@[simp]
theorem locallyRingedSpace_toLocallyRingedSpace {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : toLocallyRingedSpace Y f.1 = X := by
cases X; delta toLocallyRingedSpace; simp
end ToLocallyRingedSpace
theorem isIso_of_subset {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] (U : Opens Y.carrier)
(hU : (U : Set Y.carrier) ⊆ Set.range f.base) : IsIso (f.c.app <| op U) := by
have : U = H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) := by
ext1
exact (Set.inter_eq_left.mpr hU).symm.trans Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range.symm
convert H.c_iso ((Opens.map f.base).obj U)
end PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ f
(SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_isIso _)
instance comp {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
[SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f g
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, this local notation is often followed by a space to avoid confusion
-- with the forgetful functor, now it is often wrapped in a parenthesis
local notation "forget" => SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
instance : Mono f :=
(forget).mono_of_mono_map (show @Mono (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ f by infer_instance)
instance forgetMapIsOpenImmersion : PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((forget).map f) :=
⟨H.base_open, H.c_iso⟩
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left : HasLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_left' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map f) ((forget).map g)) from inferInstance
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right : HasLimit (cospan g f ⋙ forget) := by
have : HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) := by
change HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f))
infer_instance
apply hasLimit_of_iso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance hasLimit_cospan_forget_of_right' :
HasLimit (cospan ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl) ((cospan g f ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) :=
show HasLimit (cospan ((forget).map g) ((forget).map f)) from inferInstance
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfLeft : CreatesLimit (cospan f g) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.snd (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ f g _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance forgetCreatesPullbackOfRight : CreatesLimit (cospan g f) forget :=
createsLimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.toSheafedSpace Y
(@pullback.fst (PresheafedSpace C) _ _ _ _ g f _))
(eqToIso (show pullback _ _ = pullback _ _ by congr) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (diagramIsoCospan _).symm)
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
@Limits.comp_preservesLimit _ _ _ _ _ _ (cospan f g) _ _ forget (PresheafedSpace.forget C)
inferInstance <| by
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forget).map Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget C) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
instance sheafedSpace_forgetPreserves_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) (SheafedSpace.forget C) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan f g) forget
instance sheafedSpace_hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasLimit_of_created (cospan g f) forget
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_snd_of_left :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
have : _ = limit.π (cospan f g) right := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan f g) right
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan f g ⋙ forget)) right
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_fst_of_right :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
delta pullback.fst
have : _ = limit.π (cospan g f) left := preservesLimitIso_hom_π forget (cospan g f) left
rw [← this]
have := HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π (diagramIsoCospan (cospan g f ⋙ forget)) left
erw [Category.comp_id] at this
rw [← this]
dsimp
infer_instance
instance sheafedSpace_pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) one : pullback f g ⟶ Z) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
end Pullback
section OfStalkIso
variable [HasLimits C] [HasColimits C] {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)] [instCC : ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable [(CategoryTheory.forget C).ReflectsIsomorphisms]
[PreservesLimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
variable [PreservesFilteredColimits (CategoryTheory.forget C)]
include instCC in
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[H : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
{ base_open := hf
c_iso := fun U => by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true})
TopCat.Presheaf.app_isIso_of_stalkFunctor_map_iso
(show Y.sheaf ⟶ (TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ f.base).obj X.sheaf from ⟨f.c⟩)
rintro ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
specialize H y
delta PresheafedSpace.Hom.stalkMap at H
haveI H' := TopCat.Presheaf.stalkPushforward.stalkPushforward_iso_of_isInducing C
hf.toIsInducing X.presheaf y
have := IsIso.comp_isIso' H (@IsIso.inv_isIso _ _ _ _ _ H')
rwa [Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id] at this }
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
/-- An open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an isomorphism `X ≅ Y|_{f(X)}`. -/
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
SheafedSpace.isoMk <| PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict f
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f U
attribute [elementwise] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ invApp f ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : SheafedSpace C) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp {C : Type*} [Category C] (X : SheafedSpace C) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ h U
/-- An open immersion is an iso if the underlying continuous map is epi. -/
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
haveI : IsIso (forgetToPresheafedSpace.map f) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso f
apply isIso_of_reflects_iso _ (SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
instance stalk_iso [HasColimits C] (x : X) :
IsIso (f.stalkMap x) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso f x
end
section Prod
-- Porting note: here `ι` should have same universe level as morphism of `C`, so needs explicit
-- universe level now
variable [HasLimits C] {ι : Type v} (F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F]
(i : Discrete ι)
theorem sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding : IsOpenEmbedding (colimit.ι F i).base := by
rw [← show _ = (colimit.ι F i).base from ι_preservesColimitIso_inv (SheafedSpace.forget C) F i]
have : _ = _ ≫ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk)) i :=
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom Discrete.natIsoFunctor i
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
rw [this]
have : colimit.ι _ _ ≫ _ = _ :=
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι.{v, v} ((F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget C).obj ∘ Discrete.mk) i.as
rw [← Iso.eq_comp_inv] at this
cases i
rw [this, ← Category.assoc]
-- Porting note: `simp_rw` can't use `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso` and
-- `TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp`.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso,
TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_comp_isIso, TopCat.isOpenEmbedding_iff_isIso_comp]
exact .sigmaMk
theorem image_preimage_is_empty (j : Discrete ι) (h : i ≠ j) (U : Opens (F.obj i)) :
(Opens.map (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) j).base).obj
((Opens.map (preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
((sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i).isOpenMap.functor.obj U)) =
⊥ := by
ext x
apply iff_false_intro
rintro ⟨y, hy, eq⟩
replace eq := ConcreteCategory.congr_arg (preservesColimitIso (SheafedSpace.forget C) F ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor ≪≫ TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma.{v, v} _).hom eq
simp_rw [CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_hom, ← TopCat.comp_app, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base] at eq
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_inv] at eq
change
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F i) ≫ _) y =
((SheafedSpace.forget C).map (colimit.ι F j) ≫ _) x at eq
cases i; cases j
rw [ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc, ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc,
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc, HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom_assoc,
TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι, TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι] at eq
exact h (congr_arg Discrete.mk (congr_arg Sigma.fst eq))
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion_aux [HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) where
base_open := sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
c_iso U := by
have e : colimit.ι F i = _ :=
(ι_preservesColimitIso_inv SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F i).symm
have H :
IsOpenEmbedding
(colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).base :=
e ▸ sigma_ι_isOpenEmbedding F i
suffices IsIso <| (colimit.ι (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) i ≫
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv).c.app <|
op (H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11083): just `convert` is very slow, so helps it a bit
convert this using 2 <;> congr
rw [PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app,
← PresheafedSpace.colimitPresheafObjIsoComponentwiseLimit_hom_π]
-- Porting note: this instance created manually to make the `inferInstance` below work
have inst1 : IsIso (preservesColimitIso forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.c :=
PresheafedSpace.c_isIso_of_iso _
rsuffices : IsIso
(limit.π
(PresheafedSpace.componentwiseDiagram (F ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
((Opens.map
(preservesColimitIso SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace F).inv.base).obj
(unop <| op <| H.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
(op i))
· infer_instance
apply limit_π_isIso_of_is_strict_terminal
intro j hj
induction j with | op j => ?_
dsimp
convert (F.obj j).sheaf.isTerminalOfEmpty using 3
convert image_preimage_is_empty F i j (fun h => hj (congr_arg op h.symm)) U using 6
exact (congr_arg PresheafedSpace.Hom.base e).symm
instance sigma_ι_isOpenImmersion {ι : Type w} [Small.{v} ι]
(F : Discrete ι ⥤ SheafedSpace.{_, v, v} C) [HasColimit F] (i : Discrete ι)
[HasStrictTerminalObjects C] :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (colimit.ι F i) := by
obtain ⟨ι', ⟨e⟩⟩ := Small.equiv_small (α := ι)
let f : Discrete ι' ≌ Discrete ι := Discrete.equivalence e.symm
have : colimit.ι F i = (colimit.ι F i ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).inv) ≫
(HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence f (Iso.refl _)).hom := by
simp
rw [this, HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π]
infer_instance
end Prod
end SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
instance (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {U : TopCat} (f : U ⟶ X.toTopCat) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (X.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X.toPresheafedSpace hf
noncomputable section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f]
instance (priority := 100) of_isIso [IsIso g] : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g :=
@PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofIsIso _ _ _ _ g.1
⟨⟨(inv g).1, by
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.hom_inv_id]
erw [← LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom]; rw [IsIso.inv_hom_id]; constructor <;> rfl⟩⟩
instance comp (g : Z ⟶ Y) [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f.1 g.1
instance mono : Mono f :=
LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.mono_of_mono_map (show Mono f.toShHom by infer_instance)
instance : SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.map f) :=
H
/-- An explicit pullback cone over `cospan f g` if `f` is an open immersion. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeft : PullbackCone f g := by
refine PullbackCone.mk ?_
(Y.ofRestrict (TopCat.snd_isOpenEmbedding_of_left H.base_open g.base)) ?_
· use PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftFst f.1 g.1
intro x
have := PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition f.1 g.1) x
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
dsimp
infer_instance
· exact LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_cone_of_left_condition _ _)
instance : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd :=
show PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (Y.toPresheafedSpace.ofRestrict _) by infer_instance
/-- The constructed `pullbackConeOfLeft` is indeed limiting. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeft f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => by
refine ⟨LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.mk (PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift
f.1 g.1 (PullbackCone.mk _ _ (congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition))) ?_,
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_fst f.1 g.1 _),
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 _), ?_⟩
· intro x
have :=
PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.congr_hom _ _
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1
(PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1
(congr_arg LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition)))
x
change _ = _ ≫ s.snd.1.stalkMap x at this
rw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp, ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at this
rw [this]
infer_instance
· intro m _ h₂
rw [← cancel_mono (pullbackConeOfLeft f g).snd]
exact h₂.trans <| LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext'
(PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftLift_snd f.1 g.1 <|
PullbackCone.mk s.fst.1 s.snd.1 <| congr_arg
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.toShHom s.condition).symm
instance hasPullback_of_left : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullback_of_right : HasPullback g f :=
hasPullback_symmetry f g
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_snd_of_left :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.snd f g) := by
delta pullback.snd
rw [← limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g⟩ WalkingCospan.right]
infer_instance
/-- Open immersions are stable under base-change. -/
instance pullback_fst_of_right :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (pullback.fst g f) := by
rw [← pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
infer_instance
instance pullback_to_base_isOpenImmersion [LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion g] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
rw [← limit.w (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl]
infer_instance
instance forget_preservesPullbackOfLeft :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
apply isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesLimit_of_preserves_limit_cone (pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f g) <| by
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm.toFun
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullbackConeOfLeftIsLimit f.1 g.1
instance forgetToPresheafedSpacePreservesOpenImmersion :
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
((LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map f) :=
H
instance forgetToTop_preservesPullback_of_left :
PreservesLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) := by
change PreservesLimit _ <|
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) ⋙
PresheafedSpace.forget _
-- Porting note: was `apply (config := { instances := False }) ...`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
have : PreservesLimit
(cospan ((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inl)
((cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace).map
WalkingCospan.Hom.inr)) (PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
have : PreservesLimit (cospan f g ⋙ forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
(PresheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat) := by
apply preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram _ (diagramIsoCospan _).symm
apply Limits.comp_preservesLimit
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forget_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_preservesPullback_of_right :
PreservesLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
preservesPullback_symmetry _ _ _
instance forget_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f) LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_left :
ReflectsLimit (cospan f g)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
instance forgetToPresheafedSpace_reflectsPullback_of_right :
ReflectsLimit (cospan g f)
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) :=
reflectsLimit_of_reflectsIsomorphisms _ _
theorem pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
IsIso (pullback.snd f g) := by
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace)
apply (config := {allowSynthFailures := true}) Functor.ReflectsIsomorphisms.reflects
(F := SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace)
erw [← PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace) f g]
-- Porting note: was `inferInstance`
exact IsIso.comp_isIso' inferInstance <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset _ _ H'
/-- The universal property of open immersions:
For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Z`, given any morphism of schemes `g : Y ⟶ Z` whose topological
image is contained in the image of `f`, we can lift this morphism to a unique `Y ⟶ X` that
commutes with these maps.
-/
def lift (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : Y ⟶ X :=
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
inv (pullback.snd f g) ≫ pullback.fst _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem lift_fac (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) : lift f g H' ≫ f = g := by
erw [Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.inv_comp_eq]; exact pullback.condition
theorem lift_uniq (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) (l : Y ⟶ X) (hl : l ≫ f = g) :
l = lift f g H' := by rw [← cancel_mono f, hl, lift_fac]
theorem lift_range (H' : Set.range g.base ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
Set.range (lift f g H').base = f.base ⁻¹' Set.range g.base := by
have := pullback_snd_isIso_of_range_subset f g H'
dsimp only [lift]
have : _ = (pullback.fst f g).base :=
PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _) f g
rw [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_base, ← this, ← Category.assoc, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp,
Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· rw [TopCat.pullback_fst_range]
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩; exact ⟨y, eq.symm⟩
· rw [← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective, show (inv (pullback.snd f g)).base = _ from
(LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _).map_inv _]
infer_instance
end Pullback
/-- An open immersion is isomorphic to the induced open subscheme on its image. -/
noncomputable def isoRestrict {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] :
X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
LocallyRingedSpace.isoOfSheafedSpaceIso <|
SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.preimageIso <|
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict f.1
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y` associated with an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
abbrev opensFunctor {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f] : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
section OfStalkIso
/-- Suppose `X Y : SheafedSpace C`, where `C` is a concrete category,
whose forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms, preserves limits and filtered colimits.
Then a morphism `X ⟶ Y` that is a topological open embedding
is an open immersion iff every stalk map is an iso.
-/
theorem of_stalk_iso {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f.base)
[stalk_iso : ∀ x : X.1, IsIso (f.stalkMap x)] :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso _ hf (H := stalk_iso)
end OfStalkIso
section
variable {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
ext1
dsimp [isoRestrict, isoOfSheafedSpaceIso]
apply SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_injective
rw [Functor.map_comp, SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.map_preimage]
exact SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f.1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : (isoRestrict f).inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
simp only [← isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict f, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
/-- For an open immersion `f : X ⟶ Y` and an open set `U ⊆ X`, we have the map `X(U) ⟶ Y(U)`. -/
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp _ (unop V) =
H.invApp _ (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (opensFunctor f |>.op.map i) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality f.1 i
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp _ U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp _ U) =
f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp f.1 U
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp _ U ≫ f.c.app (op (opensFunctor f |>.obj U)) = X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective])) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app f.1 U
attribute [elementwise nosimp] invApp_app
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (opensFunctor f |>.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
/-- A variant of `app_inv_app` that gives an `eqToHom` instead of `homOfLe`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp _ ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom <|
le_antisymm (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1) <|
(Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range (f := f.base) (t := U.1)).symm ▸
Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩).op :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp f.1 U
instance ofRestrict {X : TopCat} (Y : LocallyRingedSpace) {f : X ⟶ Y.carrier}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : IsOpenImmersion (Y.ofRestrict hf) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict _ hf
@[elementwise, simp]
theorem ofRestrict_invApp (X : LocallyRingedSpace) {Y : TopCat}
{f : Y ⟶ TopCat.of X.carrier} (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) (U : Opens (X.restrict h).carrier) :
(LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict X h).invApp _ U = 𝟙 _ :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ h U
instance stalk_iso (x : X) : IsIso (f.stalkMap x) :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.stalk_iso f.1 x
theorem to_iso [h' : Epi f.base] : IsIso f := by
suffices IsIso (LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.map f) from
isIso_of_reflects_iso _ LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace
exact SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.to_iso f.1
end
end LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
end AlgebraicGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 1,344 | 1,347 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Baire spaces
A topological space is called a *Baire space*
if a countable intersection of dense open subsets is dense.
Baire theorems say that all completely metrizable spaces
and all locally compact regular spaces are Baire spaces.
We prove the theorems in `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/CompleteMetrizable`
and `Mathlib/Topology/Baire/LocallyCompactRegular`.
In this file we prove various corollaries of Baire theorems.
The good concept underlying the theorems is that of a Gδ set, i.e., a countable intersection
of open sets. Then Baire theorem can also be formulated as the fact that a countable
intersection of dense Gδ sets is a dense Gδ set. We deduce this version from Baire property.
We also prove the important consequence that, if the space is
covered by a countable union of closed sets, then the union of their interiors is dense.
We also prove that in Baire spaces, the `residual` sets are exactly those containing a dense Gδ set.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace
variable {X α : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section BaireTheorem
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [BaireSpace X]
/-- Definition of a Baire space. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat {f : ℕ → Set X} (ho : ∀ n, IsOpen (f n))
(hd : ∀ n, Dense (f n)) : Dense (⋂ n, f n) :=
BaireSpace.baire_property f ho hd
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_isOpen {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) (hS : S.Countable)
(hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense s) : Dense (⋂₀ S) := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp [h]
· rcases hS.exists_eq_range h with ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact dense_iInter_of_isOpen_nat (forall_mem_range.1 ho) (forall_mem_range.1 hd)
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable set in any type. -/
theorem dense_biInter_of_isOpen {S : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen (f s))
(hS : S.Countable) (hd : ∀ s ∈ S, Dense (f s)) : Dense (⋂ s ∈ S, f s) := by
rw [← sInter_image]
refine dense_sInter_of_isOpen ?_ (hS.image _) ?_ <;> rwa [forall_mem_image]
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense. Formulated here with
an index set which is a countable type. -/
theorem dense_iInter_of_isOpen [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i))
(hd : ∀ i, Dense (f i)) : Dense (⋂ s, f s) :=
dense_sInter_of_isOpen (forall_mem_range.2 ho) (countable_range _) (forall_mem_range.2 hd)
/-- A set is residual (comeagre) if and only if it includes a dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem mem_residual {s : Set X} : s ∈ residual X ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t := by
constructor
· rw [mem_residual_iff]
rintro ⟨S, hSo, hSd, Sct, Ss⟩
refine ⟨_, Ss, ⟨_, fun t ht => hSo _ ht, Sct, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact dense_sInter_of_isOpen hSo Sct hSd
rintro ⟨t, ts, ho, hd⟩
exact mem_of_superset (residual_of_dense_Gδ ho hd) ts
/-- A property holds on a residual (comeagre) set if and only if it holds on some dense `Gδ` set. -/
theorem eventually_residual {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in residual X, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, IsGδ t ∧ Dense t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Eventually, mem_residual, subset_def, mem_setOf_eq]
tauto
theorem dense_of_mem_residual {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ residual X) : Dense s :=
let ⟨_, hts, _, hd⟩ := mem_residual.1 hs
| hd.mono hts
/-- Baire theorem: a countable intersection of dense Gδ sets is dense. Formulated here with ⋂₀. -/
theorem dense_sInter_of_Gδ {S : Set (Set X)} (ho : ∀ s ∈ S, IsGδ s) (hS : S.Countable)
| Mathlib/Topology/Baire/Lemmas.lean | 85 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Trigonometric
/-!
# Complex and real exponential
In this file we prove continuity of `Complex.exp` and `Real.exp`. We also prove a few facts about
limits of `Real.exp` at infinity.
## Tags
exp
-/
noncomputable section
open Asymptotics Bornology Finset Filter Function Metric Set Topology
open scoped Nat
namespace Complex
variable {z y x : ℝ}
theorem exp_bound_sq (x z : ℂ) (hz : ‖z‖ ≤ 1) :
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z * exp x‖ = ‖exp x * (exp z - 1 - z)‖ := by
congr
rw [exp_add]
ring
_ = ‖exp x‖ * ‖exp z - 1 - z‖ := norm_mul _ _
_ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le hz) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem locally_lipschitz_exp {r : ℝ} (hr_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) (hr_le : r ≤ 1) (x y : ℂ)
(hyx : ‖y - x‖ < r) : ‖exp y - exp x‖ ≤ (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
have hy_eq : y = x + (y - x) := by abel
have hyx_sq_le : ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 ≤ r * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [pow_two]
exact mul_le_mul hyx.le le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hr_nonneg
have h_sq : ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ 1 → ‖exp (x + z) - exp x‖ ≤ ‖z‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
intro z hz
have : ‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := exp_bound_sq x z hz
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add', ← norm_smul z]
exact (norm_sub_norm_le _ _).trans this
calc
‖exp y - exp x‖ = ‖exp (x + (y - x)) - exp x‖ := by nth_rw 1 [hy_eq]
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 := h_sq (y - x) (hyx.le.trans hr_le)
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * (r * ‖y - x‖) :=
(add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul le_rfl hyx_sq_le (sq_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
_ = (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
-- Porting note: proof by term mode `locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x`
-- doesn't work because `‖y - x‖` and `dist y x` don't unify
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x =>
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one (2 * ‖exp x‖)
(fun y ↦ by
convert locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x y using 2
congr
ring)
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
rcases (zero_le n).eq_or_lt with rfl | hn
· simpa using continuous_exp.continuousAt.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
· refine .of_bound (n.succ / (n ! * n)) ?_
rw [NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt.eventually_iff]
refine ⟨1, one_pos, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
convert exp_bound hx.out.le hn using 1
field_simp [mul_comm]
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Complex
section ComplexContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Complex
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {z : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℂ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.cexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => exp (f y)) s x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.cexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y => exp (f y)) x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.cexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun y => exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.cexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y => exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => h.continuousAt.cexp
/-- The complex exponential function is uniformly continuous on left half planes. -/
lemma UniformContinuousOn.cexp (a : ℝ) : UniformContinuousOn exp {x : ℂ | x.re ≤ a} := by
have : Continuous (cexp - 1) := Continuous.sub (Continuous.cexp continuous_id') continuous_one
rw [Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff, Metric.continuous_iff'] at *
intro ε hε
simp only [gt_iff_lt, Pi.sub_apply, Pi.one_apply, dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right,
sub_add_cancel] at this
have ha : 0 < ε / (2 * Real.exp a) := by positivity
have H := this 0 (ε / (2 * Real.exp a)) ha
rw [Metric.eventually_nhds_iff] at H
obtain ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := H
refine ⟨δ, hδ.1, ?_⟩
intros x _ y hy hxy
have h3 := hδ.2 (y := x - y) (by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using hxy)
rw [dist_eq_norm, exp_zero] at *
have : cexp x - cexp y = cexp y * (cexp (x - y) - 1) := by
rw [mul_sub_one, ← exp_add]
ring_nf
rw [this, mul_comm]
have hya : ‖cexp y‖ ≤ Real.exp a := by
simp only [norm_exp, Real.exp_le_exp]
exact hy
simp only [gt_iff_lt, dist_zero_right, Set.mem_setOf_eq, norm_mul, Complex.norm_exp] at *
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul h3.le hya (Real.exp_nonneg y.re) (le_of_lt ha))
have hrr : ε / (2 * a.exp) * a.exp = ε / 2 := by
nth_rw 2 [mul_comm]
field_simp [mul_assoc]
rw [hrr]
exact div_two_lt_of_pos hε
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-11")] alias UniformlyContinuousOn.cexp := UniformContinuousOn.cexp
end ComplexContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.cexp
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℝ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
have := (Complex.exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow n).comp_tendsto
(Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto' 0 0 rfl)
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
norm_cast at this
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Real
section RealContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Real
theorem Filter.Tendsto.rexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {z : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.rexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.rexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.rexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.rexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y ↦ exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ h.continuousAt.rexp
end RealContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
variable {α : Type*} {x y z : ℝ} {l : Filter α}
theorem exp_half (x : ℝ) : exp (x / 2) = √(exp x) := by
rw [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, sq, ← exp_add, add_halves] <;> exact (exp_pos _).le
/-- The real exponential function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_atTop : Tendsto exp atTop atTop := by
have A : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x + 1) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop 1 tendsto_id
have B : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, x + 1 ≤ exp x := eventually_atTop.2 ⟨0, fun x _ => add_one_le_exp x⟩
exact tendsto_atTop_mono' atTop B A
/-- The real exponential function tends to `0` at `-∞` or, equivalently, `exp(-x)` tends to `0`
at `+∞` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun x => exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_exp_atTop).congr fun x => (exp_neg x).symm
/-- The real exponential function tends to `1` at `0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one : Tendsto exp (𝓝 0) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_exp.tendsto 0
simp
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr fun x =>
congr_arg exp <| neg_neg x
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_exp_atBot, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall exp_pos⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsWithin := tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_exp_comp (l : Filter α) (f : α → ℝ) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => exp (f x) :=
isBoundedUnder_of ⟨0, fun _ => (exp_pos _).le⟩
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
exp_monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp_iff tendsto_exp_atTop
/-- The function `exp(x)/x^n` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop (n : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun x => exp x / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
refine (atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff (atTop_basis' 1)).2 fun C hC₁ => ?_
have hC₀ : 0 < C := zero_lt_one.trans_le hC₁
have : 0 < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos (exp_pos _) hC₀)
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ N, (↑k : ℝ) ^ n / exp 1 ^ k < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ :=
eventually_atTop.1
((tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt n (one_lt_exp_iff.2 zero_lt_one)).eventually
(gt_mem_nhds this))
simp only [← exp_nat_mul, mul_one, div_lt_iff₀, exp_pos, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hN
refine ⟨N, trivial, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hx
have hx₀ : 0 < x := (Nat.cast_nonneg N).trans_lt hx
rw [Set.mem_Ici, le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos hx₀ _), ← le_div_iff₀' hC₀]
calc
x ^ n ≤ ⌈x⌉₊ ^ n := by gcongr; exact Nat.le_ceil _
_ ≤ exp ⌈x⌉₊ / (exp 1 * C) := mod_cast (hN _ (Nat.lt_ceil.2 hx).le).le
_ ≤ exp (x + 1) / (exp 1 * C) := by gcongr; exact (Nat.ceil_lt_add_one hx₀.le).le
_ = exp x / C := by rw [add_comm, exp_add, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (exp_pos _).ne']
/-- The function `x^n * exp(-x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n * exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)).congr fun x => by
rw [comp_apply, inv_eq_one_div, div_div_eq_mul_div, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, exp_neg]
/-- The function `(b * exp x + c) / (x ^ n)` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is positive. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x => (b * exp x + c) / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp only [pow_zero, div_one]
exact (tendsto_exp_atTop.const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [add_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact
((tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n).const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add
(tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_pow_atTop hn))
/-- The function `(x ^ n) / (b * exp x + c)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n / (b * exp x + c)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have H : ∀ d e, 0 < d → Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n / (d * exp x + e)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
intro b' c' h
convert (tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop b' c' n h).inv_tendsto_atTop using 1
ext x
simp
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hb with h | h
· exact H b c h
· convert (H (-b) (-c) (neg_pos.mpr h)).neg using 1
· ext x
field_simp
rw [← neg_add (b * exp x) c, neg_div_neg_eq]
· rw [neg_zero]
/-- `Real.exp` as an order isomorphism between `ℝ` and `(0, +∞)`. -/
def expOrderIso : ℝ ≃o Ioi (0 : ℝ) :=
StrictMono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ (exp_strictMono.codRestrict exp_pos) <|
(continuous_exp.subtype_mk _).surjective
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atTop]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atTop])
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atBot]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT])
@[simp]
theorem coe_expOrderIso_apply (x : ℝ) : (expOrderIso x : ℝ) = exp x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_expOrderIso : (↑) ∘ expOrderIso = exp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : range exp = Set.Ioi 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, range_comp, expOrderIso.range_eq, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atTop : map exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, OrderIso.map_atTop, map_val_Ioi_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_atTop : comap exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← map_exp_atTop, comap_map exp_injective, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_exp_comp_atTop {f : α → ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := exp), ← tendsto_comap_iff, comap_exp_atTop]
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atTop {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (g := exp), ← tendsto_map'_iff, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atBot : map exp atBot = 𝓝[>] 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, expOrderIso.map_atBot, ← map_coe_Ioi_atBot]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero : comap exp (𝓝[>] 0) = atBot := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, comap_map exp_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_exp_nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero := comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atBot {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] 0) l := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhds_zero : comap exp (𝓝 0) = atBot :=
(comap_nhdsWithin_range exp 0).symm.trans <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_exp_comp_nhds_zero {f : α → ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 0) ↔ Tendsto f l atBot := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := exp), ← tendsto_comap_iff, comap_exp_nhds_zero]
theorem isOpenEmbedding_exp : IsOpenEmbedding exp :=
isOpen_Ioi.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.comp expOrderIso.toHomeomorph.isOpenEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_nhds (x : ℝ) : map exp (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (exp x) :=
isOpenEmbedding_exp.map_nhds_eq x
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhds_exp (x : ℝ) : comap exp (𝓝 (exp x)) = 𝓝 x :=
(isOpenEmbedding_exp.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
|
theorem isLittleO_pow_exp_atTop {n : ℕ} : (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n) =o[atTop] Real.exp := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Exp.lean | 375 | 376 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Ordinal notation
Constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals below `ε₀`.
We define a type `ONote`, with constructors `0 : ONote` and `ONote.oadd e n a` representing
`ω ^ e * n + a`.
We say that `o` is in Cantor normal form - `ONote.NF o` - if either `o = 0` or
`o = ω ^ e * n + a` with `a < ω ^ e` and `a` in Cantor normal form.
The type `NONote` is the type of ordinals below `ε₀` in Cantor normal form.
Various operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, exponentiation)
are defined on `ONote` and `NONote`.
-/
open Ordinal Order
-- The generated theorem `ONote.zero.sizeOf_spec` is flagged by `simpNF`,
-- and we don't otherwise need it.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is
intended to refer to `ω ^ e * n + a`. For this to be a valid Cantor normal form, we must have the
exponents decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've defined `repr`, so we
make it a separate definition `NF`. -/
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
@[simp] theorem repr_zero : repr 0 = 0 := rfl
attribute [simp] repr.eq_1 repr.eq_2
/-- Print `ω^s*n`, omitting `s` if `e = 0` or `e = 1`, and omitting `n` if `n = 1` -/
private def toString_aux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toString_aux e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toString_aux e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
open Lean in
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
/-- Convert a `Nat` into an ordinal -/
@[coe] def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance (priority := low) nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200] theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
@[simp] theorem repr_one : repr 1 = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
theorem omega0_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos).2 (Nat.cast_le.2 n.2)
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos) (omega0_le_oadd e n a)
/-- Comparison of ordinal notations:
`ω ^ e₁ * n₁ + a₁` is less than `ω ^ e₂ * n₂ + a₂` when either `e₁ < e₂`, or `e₁ = e₂` and
`n₁ < n₂`, or `e₁ = e₂`, `n₁ = n₂`, and `a₁ < a₂`. -/
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).then <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).then (cmp a₁ a₂)
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq, not_lt, not_lt, ← le_antisymm_iff] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq h₂
simp
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr_zero, repr_one, Nat.cast_one, zero_lt_one]
/-- `NFBelow o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
`ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ⋯ + ω ^ aₖ * nₖ`
where `a₁ > a₂ > ⋯ > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating
the algorithms, we define everything over general ordinal notations and only prove correctness with
normal form as an invariant. -/
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₂
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₃
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction h with
| zero => exact opow_pos _ omega0_pos
| oadd' _ _ h₃ _ IH =>
rw [repr]
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 _)) _).trans
rw [← opow_succ]
exact opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃)
theorem NFBelow.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NFBelow o b₁) : NFBelow o b₂ := by
induction h with
| zero => exact zero
| oadd' h₁ h₂ h₃ _ _ => constructor; exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) :
NF (ONote.oadd e n a) → NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ => by (obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact NFBelow.oadd' h₁ h₂ H)
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NFBelow o b
| 0, _, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| ONote.oadd _ _ _, _, H, h =>
h.below_of_lt <|
(opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega0).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (omega0_le_oadd _ _ _) H
theorem nfBelow_ofNat : ∀ n, NFBelow (ofNat n) 1
| 0 => NFBelow.zero
| Nat.succ _ => NFBelow.oadd NF.zero NFBelow.zero zero_lt_one
instance nf_ofNat (n) : NF (ofNat n) :=
⟨⟨_, nfBelow_ofNat n⟩⟩
instance nf_one : NF 1 := by rw [← ofNat_one]; infer_instance
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ (repr (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) _ _
(NF.below_of_lt h h₁).repr_lt (omega0_le_oadd e₂ n₂ o₂)
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : ONote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+} (h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁ : ℕ) < n₂) :
oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ := by
simp only [lt_def, repr]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt) (le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _))
rwa [← mul_succ,Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega0_pos), succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_lt]
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) : oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ := by
rw [lt_def]; unfold repr
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ (repr a₁) _ h _
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : ONote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).Compares a b
| 0, 0, _, _ => rfl
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0, oadd _ _ _, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂), h₁, h₂ => by -- TODO: golf
rw [cmp]
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
simp only [Ordering.Compares, gt_iff_lt] at IHe; revert IHe
cases cmp e₁ e₂
case lt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe
case gt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe
case eq =>
intro IHe; dsimp at IHe; subst IHe
unfold _root_.cmp; cases nh : cmpUsing (· < ·) (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;>
rw [cmpUsing, ite_eq_iff, not_lt] at nh
case lt =>
rcases nh with nh | nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh.left
· rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; rcases nh.right with nh | nh <;> cases nh <;> contradiction
case gt =>
rcases nh with nh | nh
· cases nh; contradiction
· obtain ⟨_, nh⟩ := nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; rcases nh with nh | nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh.left
· cases nh; contradiction
rcases nh with nh | nh
· cases nh; contradiction
obtain ⟨nhl, nhr⟩ := nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nhr
rcases nhr with nhr | nhr
· cases nhr; contradiction
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (nhl.eq_of_not_lt nhr.1)
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd
revert IHa; cases cmp a₁ a₂ <;> intro IHa <;> dsimp at IHa
case lt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
case gt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
subst IHa; exact rfl
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun e => match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| Ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b) => (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| Ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b)=> (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| Ordering.eq, h => h,
congr_arg _⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega0_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a))
(d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 (fun h => by injection h : ONote.oadd e n a ≠ 0)
have L := le_of_not_lt fun l => not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)
simp only [repr] at d
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff <| (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega0 {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a := by
(rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega0_opow)
/-- `TopBelow b o` asserts that the largest exponent in `o`, if it exists, is less than `b`. This is
an auxiliary definition for decidability of `NF`. -/
def TopBelow (b : ONote) : ONote → Prop
| 0 => True
| oadd e _ _ => cmp e b = Ordering.lt
instance decidableTopBelow : DecidableRel TopBelow := by
intro b o
cases o <;> delta TopBelow <;> infer_instance
theorem nfBelow_iff_topBelow {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ TopBelow b o
| 0 => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
h₁.below_of_lt <| (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
instance decidableNF : DecidablePred NF
| 0 => isTrue NF.zero
| oadd e n a => by
have := decidableNF e
have := decidableNF a
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ TopBelow e a)
rw [← and_congr_right fun h => @nfBelow_iff_topBelow _ h _]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩
/-- Auxiliary definition for `add` -/
def addAux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ+) (o : ONote) : ONote :=
match o with
| 0 => oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') =>
match cmp e e' with
| Ordering.lt => o'
| Ordering.eq => oadd e (n + n') a'
| Ordering.gt => oadd e n o'
/-- Addition of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def add : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, o => o
| oadd e n a, o => addAux e n (add a o)
instance : Add ONote :=
⟨add⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_add (o : ONote) : 0 + o = o :=
rfl
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = addAux e n (a + o) :=
rfl
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def sub : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| o, 0 => o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| Ordering.lt => 0
| Ordering.gt => o₁
| Ordering.eq =>
match (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 => if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| Nat.succ k => oadd e₁ k.succPNat a₁
instance : Sub ONote :=
⟨sub⟩
theorem add_nfBelow {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NFBelow o₁ b → NFBelow o₂ b → NFBelow (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0, _, _, h₂ => h₂
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := add_nfBelow (h₁.snd.mono <| le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂
simp only [oadd_add]; revert h'; obtain - | ⟨e', n', a'⟩ := a + o <;> intro h'
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst NFBelow.zero h₁.lt
have : ((e.cmp e').Compares e e') := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst
cases h : cmp e e' <;> dsimp [addAux] <;> simp only [h]
· exact h'
· simp only [h] at this
subst e'
exact NFBelow.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt
· simp only [h] at this
exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩) h₁.lt
instance add_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨(le_total b₁ b₂).elim (fun h => ⟨b₂, add_nfBelow (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩) fun h =>
⟨b₁, add_nfBelow h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem repr_add : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0, o, _, _ => by simp
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; have h' := repr_add a o
conv_lhs at h' => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
have nf := ONote.add_nf a o
conv at nf => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
conv in _ + o => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
rcases h : add a o with - | ⟨e', n', a'⟩ <;>
simp only [Add.add, add, addAux, h'.symm, h, add_assoc, repr_zero, repr] at nf h₁ ⊢
have := h₁.fst; haveI := nf.fst; have ee := cmp_compares e e'
cases he : cmp e e' <;> simp only [he, Ordering.compares_gt, Ordering.compares_lt,
Ordering.compares_eq, repr, gt_iff_lt, PNat.add_coe, Nat.cast_add] at ee ⊢
· rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n' : ℕ))]
· have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt
unfold repr at this
cases he' : e' <;> simp only [he', zero_def, opow_zero, repr, gt_iff_lt] at this ⊢ <;>
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this
· simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e') omega0_pos).2
(Nat.cast_le.2 n'.pos)
· rw [ee, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add]
theorem sub_nfBelow : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NFBelow o₁ b → NF o₂ → NFBelow (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0, o, b, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NFBelow.zero
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, h₁, _ => h₁
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := sub_nfBelow h₁.snd h₂.snd
simp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂
· apply NFBelow.zero
· rw [Nat.sub_eq]
simp only [h, Ordering.compares_eq] at this
subst e₂
cases (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂ <;> simp only [en, ↓reduceIte]
· exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt)
· exact NFBelow.zero
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt
· exact h₁
instance sub_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, h₂ => ⟨⟨b₁, sub_nfBelow h₁ h₂⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem repr_sub : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (Ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, _ => (Ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; haveI := h₂.snd; have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂
conv_lhs at h' => dsimp [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub]
conv_lhs => dsimp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub]; dsimp only [sub]
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp only [h] at ee
· rw [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2]
· rfl
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee)
· change e₁ = e₂ at ee
subst e₂
dsimp only
cases mn : (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> dsimp only
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂
· simpa [en]
· simp only [en, ite_false]
exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 <|
le_of_lt <|
oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ <|
lt_of_le_of_ne (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt PNat.eq en)).symm
· simp [Nat.succPNat]
rw [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn, add_comm,
Nat.cast_add, mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel]
refine
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt <| le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)).symm
exact Ordinal.le_mul_left _ (Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.succ_pos _)
· exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt <| omega0_le_oadd _ _ _).symm
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def mul : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
instance : Mul ONote :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : MulZeroClass ONote where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
zero_mul o := by cases o <;> rfl
mul_zero o := by cases o <;> rfl
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) :=
rfl
theorem oadd_mul_nfBelow {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NFBelow o₂ b₂ → NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b₂, h₂ => by
have IH := oadd_mul_nfBelow h₁ h₂.snd
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp only [e0, oadd_mul, ↓reduceIte]
· apply NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt)
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
apply NFBelow.oadd
· infer_instance
· rwa [repr_add]
· rw [repr_add, add_lt_add_iff_left]
exact h₂.lt
instance mul_nf : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NF.zero
| oadd _ _ _, _, ⟨⟨_, hb₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, hb₂⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨_, oadd_mul_nfBelow hb₁ hb₂⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem repr_mul : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, _ => (mul_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd
conv =>
lhs
simp [(· * ·)]
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) := by
apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos _ omega0_pos).2 (Nat.cast_le.2 n₁.2)
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0
· obtain ⟨x, xe⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero
simp only [Mul.mul, mul, e0, ↓reduceIte, repr, PNat.mul_coe, natCast_mul, opow_zero, one_mul]
simp only [xe, h₂.zero_of_zero e0, repr, add_zero]
rw [natCast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc]
· simp only [repr]
haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
simp only [Mul.mul, mul, e0, ite_false, repr.eq_2, repr_add, opow_add, IH, repr, mul_add]
rw [← mul_assoc]
congr 2
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [add_mul_limit ao (isLimit_opow_left isLimit_omega0 this), mul_assoc,
mul_omega0_dvd (Nat.cast_pos'.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega0 _)]
simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod `ω`:
`split' o = (a, n)` means `o = ω * a + n`. -/
def split' : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split' a
(oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod `ω`:
`split o = (a, n)` means `o = a + n`, where `ω ∣ a`. -/
def split : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split a
(oadd e n a', m)
/-- `scale x o` is the ordinal notation for `ω ^ x * o`. -/
def scale (x : ONote) : ONote → ONote
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => oadd (x + e) n (scale x a)
/-- `mulNat o n` is the ordinal notation for `o * n`. -/
def mulNat : ONote → ℕ → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| oadd e n a, m + 1 => oadd e (n * m.succPNat) a
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal exponentiation in `opow` -/
def opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) : ℕ → ℕ → ONote
| _, 0 => 0
| 0, m + 1 => oadd e m.succPNat 0
| k + 1, m => scale (e + mulNat a0 k) a + (opowAux e a0 a k m)
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal exponentiation in `opow` -/
def opowAux2 (o₂ : ONote) (o₁ : ONote × ℕ) : ONote :=
match o₁ with
| (0, 0) => if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) => 1
| (0, m + 1) =>
let (b', k) := split' o₂
oadd b' (m.succPNat ^ k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) =>
match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) => oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k + 1) =>
let eb := a0 * b
scale (eb + mulNat a0 k) a + opowAux eb a0 (mulNat a m) k m
/-- `opow o₁ o₂` calculates the ordinal notation for the ordinal exponential `o₁ ^ o₂`. -/
def opow (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : ONote := opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁)
instance : Pow ONote ONote :=
⟨opow⟩
theorem opow_def (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁) :=
rfl
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; rfl
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp only [split', e0, ↓reduceIte, Prod.mk.injEq, split] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· revert p
rcases h' : split' a with ⟨a', m'⟩
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
simp only [split_eq_scale_split' h', and_imp]
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e := by
refine repr_inj.1 ?_
simp only [repr_add, repr_one, Nat.cast_one, repr_sub]
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
exact Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this
intros
substs o' m
simp [scale, this]
theorem nf_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero]
· revert p
rcases h' : split' a with ⟨a', m'⟩
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
obtain ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ := nf_repr_split' h'
simp only [IH₂, and_imp]
intros
substs o' m
have : (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : Ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1) := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)]
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by infer_instance) _ ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [opow_one, repr_sub, repr_one, Nat.cast_one] at this ⊢
refine IH₁.below_of_lt'
((Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega0_pos).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') ?_)
rw [← this, ← IH₂]
exact h.snd'.repr_lt
· rw [this]
simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ (o) [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, h => by
simp only [HMul.hMul]; simp only [scale]
haveI := h.snd
by_cases e0 : e = 0
· simp_rw [scale_eq_mul]
simp [Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, e0, h.zero_of_zero,
show x + 0 = x from repr_inj.1 (by simp)]
· simp [e0, Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, (· * ·)]
instance nf_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) := by
rw [scale_eq_mul]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o := by
simp only [scale_eq_mul, repr_mul, repr, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero]
theorem nf_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m := by
rcases e : split' o with ⟨a, n⟩
obtain ⟨s₁, s₂⟩ := nf_repr_split' e
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; substs o' n
simp only [repr_scale, repr_one, Nat.cast_one, opow_one, ← s₂, and_true]
infer_instance
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' := by
rcases e : split' o with ⟨a, n⟩
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; subst o'
cases nf_repr_split' e; simp
theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) :
repr a + m < ω ^ repr e := by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := nf_repr_split h
obtain ⟨e0, d⟩ := h₁.of_dvd_omega0 (split_dvd h)
apply principal_add_omega0_opow _ h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega0 _) _)
simpa using opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)
@[simp]
theorem mulNat_eq_mul (n o) : mulNat o n = o * ofNat n := by cases o <;> cases n <;> rfl
instance nf_mulNat (o) [NF o] (n) : NF (mulNat o n) := by simpa using ONote.mul_nf o (ofNat n)
instance nf_opowAux (e a0 a) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] : ∀ k m, NF (opowAux e a0 a k m) := by
intro k m
unfold opowAux
cases m with
| zero => cases k <;> exact NF.zero
| succ m =>
cases k with
| zero => exact NF.oadd_zero _ _
| succ k =>
haveI := nf_opowAux e a0 a k
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero m, IsEmpty.forall_iff, mulNat_eq_mul]; infer_instance
instance nf_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : NF (o₁ ^ o₂) := by
rcases e₁ : split o₁ with ⟨a, m⟩
have na := (nf_repr_split e₁).1
rcases e₂ : split' o₂ with ⟨b', k⟩
haveI := (nf_repr_split' e₂).1
obtain - | ⟨a0, n, a'⟩ := a
· rcases m with - | m
· by_cases o₂ = 0 <;> simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, opow, opowAux2, *] <;> decide
· by_cases m = 0
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, opow, opowAux2, *, zero_def]
decide
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, opow, opowAux2, mulNat_eq_mul, ofNat, *]
infer_instance
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, opow, opowAux2, e₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂, mulNat_eq_mul]
have := na.fst
rcases k with - | k
· infer_instance
· cases k <;> cases m <;> infer_instance
theorem scale_opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] :
∀ k m, repr (opowAux e a0 a k m) = ω ^ repr e * repr (opowAux 0 a0 a k m)
| 0, m => by cases m <;> simp [opowAux]
| k + 1, m => by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [h, opowAux, mul_add, opow_add, mul_assoc, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
· -- Porting note: rewrote proof
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [repr_add, repr_scale, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
simp only [repr_add, repr_scale, opow_add, mul_assoc, zero_add, mul_add]
theorem repr_opow_aux₁ {e a} [Ne : NF e] [Na : NF a] {a' : Ordinal} (e0 : repr e ≠ 0)
(h : a' < (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e) (aa : repr a = a') (n : ℕ+) :
((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e * (n : ℕ) + a') ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) =
(ω ^ repr e) ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) := by
subst aa
have No := Ne.oadd n (Na.below_of_lt' h)
have := omega0_le_oadd e n a
rw [repr] at this
refine le_antisymm ?_ (opow_le_opow_left _ this)
apply (opow_le_of_limit ((opow_pos _ omega0_pos).trans_le this).ne' isLimit_omega0).2
intro b l
have := (No.below_of_lt (lt_succ _)).repr_lt
rw [repr] at this
apply (opow_le_opow_left b <| this.le).trans
rw [← opow_mul, ← opow_mul]
apply opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos
rcases le_or_lt ω (repr e) with h | h
· apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ b) _).trans
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, add_mul_succ _ (one_add_of_omega0_le h), add_one_eq_succ, succ_le_iff,
Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)]
exact isLimit_omega0.succ_lt l
· apply (principal_mul_omega0 (isLimit_omega0.succ_lt h) l).le.trans
simpa using mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0) ω
section
-- Porting note: `R'` is used in the proof but marked as an unused variable.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem repr_opow_aux₂ {a0 a'} [N0 : NF a0] [Na' : NF a'] (m : ℕ) (d : ω ∣ repr a')
(e0 : repr a0 ≠ 0) (h : repr a' + m < (ω ^ repr a0)) (n : ℕ+) (k : ℕ) :
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
(k ≠ 0 → R < ((ω ^ repr a0) ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧
((ω ^ repr a0) ^ (k : Ordinal)) * ((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a') + R =
((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a' + m) ^ succ (k : Ordinal) := by
intro R'
haveI No : NF (oadd a0 n a') :=
N0.oadd n (Na'.below_of_lt' <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h)
induction' k with k IH
· cases m <;> simp [R', opowAux]
-- rename R => R'
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
let ω0 := ω ^ repr a0
let α' := ω0 * n + repr a'
change (k ≠ 0 → R < (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧ (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R
= (α' + m) ^ (succ ↑k : Ordinal) at IH
have RR : R' = ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) * (α' * m) + R := by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp only [R, R', h, ONote.ofNat, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, ONote.repr, mul_zero,
ONote.opowAux, add_zero]
· simp only [α', ω0, R, R', ONote.repr_scale, ONote.repr, ONote.mulNat_eq_mul, ONote.opowAux,
ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_mul, ONote.repr_add, Ordinal.opow_mul, ONote.zero_add]
have α0 : 0 < α' := by simpa [lt_def, repr] using oadd_pos a0 n a'
have ω00 : 0 < ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) := opow_pos _ (opow_pos _ omega0_pos)
have Rl : R < ω ^ (repr a0 * succ ↑k) := by
by_cases k0 : k = 0
· simp only [k0, Nat.cast_zero, succ_zero, mul_one, R]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0))
rcases m with - | m <;> simp [opowAux, omega0_pos]
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ]
apply nat_lt_omega0
· rw [opow_mul]
exact IH.1 k0
refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [RR, ← opow_mul _ _ (succ k.succ)]
have e0 := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0
have rr0 : 0 < repr a0 + repr a0 := lt_of_lt_of_le e0 (le_add_left _ _)
apply principal_add_omega0_opow
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_eq_succ,
opow_mul, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
rw [Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00, ← Ordinal.opow_add]
have : _ < ω ^ (repr a0 + repr a0) := (No.below_of_lt ?_).repr_lt
· exact mul_lt_omega0_opow rr0 this (nat_lt_omega0 _)
· simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr a0)).2 e0
· exact
lt_of_lt_of_le Rl
(opow_le_opow_right omega0_pos <|
mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 (le_of_lt k.lt_succ_self))) _)
calc
(ω0 ^ (k.succ : Ordinal)) * α' + R'
_ = (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' * m + R) := by
rw [natCast_succ, RR, ← mul_assoc]
_ = ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * m := ?_
_ = (α' + m) ^ succ (k.succ : Ordinal) := by rw [← mul_add, natCast_succ, opow_succ, IH.2]
congr 1
· have αd : ω ∣ α' :=
dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (by simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)) _) d
rw [mul_add (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)), add_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_succ,
add_mul_limit _ (isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd.2 ⟨ne_of_gt α0, αd⟩), mul_assoc,
@mul_omega0_dvd n (Nat.cast_pos'.2 n.pos) (nat_lt_omega0 _) _ αd]
apply @add_absorp _ (repr a0 * succ ↑k)
· refine principal_add_omega0_opow _ ?_ Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00]
exact No.snd'.repr_lt
· have := mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 <| Nat.cast_pos'.2 n.pos) (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))
rw [opow_mul]
simpa [-opow_succ]
· cases m
· have : R = 0 := by cases k <;> simp [R, opowAux]
simp [this]
· rw [natCast_succ, add_mul_succ]
apply add_absorp Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
simpa [repr] using omega0_le_oadd a0 n a'
end
theorem repr_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : repr (o₁ ^ o₂) = repr o₁ ^ repr o₂ := by
rcases e₁ : split o₁ with ⟨a, m⟩
obtain ⟨N₁, r₁⟩ := nf_repr_split e₁
obtain - | ⟨a0, n, a'⟩ := a
· rcases m with - | m
· by_cases h : o₂ = 0 <;> simp [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁]
have := mt repr_inj.1 h
rw [zero_opow this]
· rcases e₂ : split' o₂ with ⟨b', k⟩
obtain ⟨_, r₂⟩ := nf_repr_split' e₂
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [opowAux2, opow_def, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂]
simp only [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, repr,
opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, _root_.zero_add, mul_one,
add_zero, one_opow, npow_eq_pow]
rw [opow_add, opow_mul, opow_omega0, add_one_eq_succ]
· congr
conv_lhs =>
dsimp [(· ^ ·)]
simp [Pow.pow, opow, Ordinal.succ_ne_zero]
rw [opow_natCast]
· simpa [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
· rw [← Nat.cast_succ, lt_omega0]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· haveI := N₁.fst
haveI := N₁.snd
obtain ⟨a00, ad⟩ := N₁.of_dvd_omega0 (split_dvd e₁)
have al := split_add_lt e₁
have aa : repr (a' + ofNat m) = repr a' + m := by
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_add]
rcases e₂ : split' o₂ with ⟨b', k⟩
obtain ⟨_, r₂⟩ := nf_repr_split' e₂
simp only [opow_def, opow, e₁, r₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂, opowAux2, repr]
rcases k with - | k
· simp [r₂, opow_mul, repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, add_assoc]
· simp [opow, opowAux2, r₂, opow_add, opow_mul, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
rw [repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, scale_opowAux]
simp only [repr_mul, repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, PNat.val_ofNat, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
add_zero, opow_one, opow_mul]
rw [← mul_add, ← add_assoc ((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr a0 * (n : ℕ))]
congr 1
rw [← pow_succ, ← opow_natCast, ← opow_natCast]
exact (repr_opow_aux₂ _ ad a00 al _ _).2
/-- Given an ordinal, returns:
* `inl none` for `0`
* `inl (some a)` for `a + 1`
* `inr f` for a limit ordinal `a`, where `f i` is a sequence converging to `a` -/
def fundamentalSequence : ONote → (Option ONote) ⊕ (ℕ → ONote)
| zero => Sum.inl none
| oadd a m b =>
match fundamentalSequence b with
| Sum.inr f => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m (f i)
| Sum.inl (some b') => Sum.inl (some (oadd a m b'))
| Sum.inl none =>
match fundamentalSequence a, m.natPred with
| Sum.inl none, 0 => Sum.inl (some zero)
| Sum.inl none, m + 1 => Sum.inl (some (oadd zero m.succPNat zero))
| Sum.inl (some a'), 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a' i.succPNat zero
| Sum.inl (some a'), m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd a' i.succPNat zero)
| Sum.inr f, 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd (f i) 1 zero
| Sum.inr f, m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd (f i) 1 zero)
private theorem exists_lt_add {α} [hα : Nonempty α] {o : Ordinal} {f : α → Ordinal}
(H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) {b : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b + o) : ∃ i, a < b + f i := by
rcases lt_or_le a b with h | h'
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := id hα
exact ⟨i, h.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left] at h
refine (H h).imp fun i H => ?_
rwa [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left]
private theorem exists_lt_mul_omega0' {o : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < o * ω) :
∃ i : ℕ, a < o * ↑i + o := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, h'⟩ := (lt_mul_of_limit isLimit_omega0).1 h
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hi
exact ⟨i, h'.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
private theorem exists_lt_omega0_opow' {α} {o b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o.IsLimit)
{f : α → Ordinal} (H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b ^ o) :
∃ i, a < b ^ f i := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, h'⟩ := (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' ho).1 h
exact (H hd).imp fun i hi => h'.trans <| (opow_lt_opow_iff_right hb).2 hi
/-- The property satisfied by `fundamentalSequence o`:
* `inl none` means `o = 0`
* `inl (some a)` means `o = succ a`
* `inr f` means `o` is a limit ordinal and `f` is a strictly increasing sequence which converges to
`o` -/
def FundamentalSequenceProp (o : ONote) : (Option ONote) ⊕ (ℕ → ONote) → Prop
| Sum.inl none => o = 0
| Sum.inl (some a) => o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF)
| Sum.inr f =>
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧ ∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_none (o) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl none) ↔ o = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_some (o a) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl (some a)) ↔ o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inr (o f) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inr f) ↔
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧
∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequence_has_prop (o) : FundamentalSequenceProp o (fundamentalSequence o) := by
induction' o with a m b iha ihb; · exact rfl
rw [fundamentalSequence]
rcases e : b.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | b'⟩ | f) <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at ihb
· rcases e : a.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | a'⟩ | f) <;> rcases e' : m.natPred with - | m' <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at iha <;>
(try rw [show m = 1 by
have := PNat.natPred_add_one m; rw [e'] at this; exact PNat.coe_inj.1 this.symm]) <;>
(try rw [show m = (m' + 1).succPNat by
rw [← e', ← PNat.coe_inj, Nat.succPNat_coe, ← Nat.add_one, PNat.natPred_add_one]]) <;>
simp only [repr, iha, ihb, opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega0, add_lt_add_iff_left,
add_zero, eq_self_iff_true, lt_add_iff_pos_right, lt_def, mul_one, Nat.cast_zero,
Nat.cast_succ, Nat.succPNat_coe, opow_succ, opow_zero, mul_add_one, PNat.one_coe, succ_zero,
_root_.zero_add, zero_def]
· decide
· exact ⟨rfl, inferInstance⟩
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega0_pos
refine
⟨isLimit_mul this isLimit_omega0, fun i =>
⟨this, ?_, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)⟩, exists_lt_mul_omega0'⟩
rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega0
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega0_pos
refine
⟨isLimit_add _ (isLimit_mul this isLimit_omega0), fun i => ⟨this, ?_, ?_⟩,
exists_lt_add exists_lt_mul_omega0'⟩
· rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega0
· refine fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)))
rw [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, iha.1, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega0
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine ⟨isLimit_opow one_lt_omega0 h1, fun i => ?_,
exists_lt_omega0_opow' one_lt_omega0 h1 h3⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
exact ⟨h4, h5, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)⟩
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine
⟨isLimit_add _ (isLimit_opow one_lt_omega0 h1), fun i => ?_,
exists_lt_add (exists_lt_omega0_opow' one_lt_omega0 h1 h3)⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
refine ⟨h4, h5, fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)))⟩
rwa [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega0]
· refine ⟨by
rw [repr, ihb.1, add_succ, repr], fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (ihb.2 H.snd))⟩
have := H.snd'.repr_lt
rw [ihb.1] at this
exact (lt_succ _).trans this
· rcases ihb with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
simp only [repr]
exact
⟨Ordinal.isLimit_add _ h1, fun i =>
⟨oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).1, oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).2.1, fun H =>
H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' (lt_trans (h2 i).2.1 H.snd'.repr_lt) ((h2 i).2.2 H.snd))⟩,
exists_lt_add h3⟩
/-- The fast growing hierarchy for ordinal notations `< ε₀`. This is a sequence of functions `ℕ → ℕ`
indexed by ordinals, with the definition:
* `f_0(n) = n + 1`
* `f_(α + 1)(n) = f_α^[n](n)`
* `f_α(n) = f_(α[n])(n)` where `α` is a limit ordinal and `α[i]` is the fundamental sequence
converging to `α` -/
def fastGrowing : ONote → ℕ → ℕ
| o =>
match fundamentalSequence o, fundamentalSequence_has_prop o with
| Sum.inl none, _ => Nat.succ
| Sum.inl (some a), h =>
have : a < o := by rw [lt_def, h.1]; apply lt_succ
fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i
| Sum.inr f, h => fun i =>
have : f i < o := (h.2.1 i).2.1
fastGrowing (f i) i
termination_by o => o
-- Porting note: the linter bug should be fixed.
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem fastGrowing_def {o : ONote} {x} (e : fundamentalSequence o = x) :
fastGrowing o =
match
(motive := (x : Option ONote ⊕ (ℕ → ONote)) → FundamentalSequenceProp o x → ℕ → ℕ)
x, e ▸ fundamentalSequence_has_prop o with
| Sum.inl none, _ => Nat.succ
| Sum.inl (some a), _ =>
fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i
| Sum.inr f, _ => fun i =>
fastGrowing (f i) i := by
subst x
rw [fastGrowing]
theorem fastGrowing_zero' (o : ONote) (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inl none) :
fastGrowing o = Nat.succ := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
theorem fastGrowing_succ (o) {a} (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inl (some a)) :
fastGrowing o = fun i => (fastGrowing a)^[i] i := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
theorem fastGrowing_limit (o) {f} (h : fundamentalSequence o = Sum.inr f) :
fastGrowing o = fun i => fastGrowing (f i) i := by
rw [fastGrowing_def h]
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_zero : fastGrowing 0 = Nat.succ :=
fastGrowing_zero' _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_one : fastGrowing 1 = fun n => 2 * n := by
rw [@fastGrowing_succ 1 0 rfl]; funext i; rw [two_mul, fastGrowing_zero]
suffices ∀ a b, Nat.succ^[a] b = b + a from this _ _
intro a b; induction a <;> simp [*, Function.iterate_succ', Nat.add_assoc, -Function.iterate_succ]
@[simp]
theorem fastGrowing_two : fastGrowing 2 = fun n => (2 ^ n) * n := by
rw [@fastGrowing_succ 2 1 rfl]; funext i; rw [fastGrowing_one]
suffices ∀ a b, (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n)^[a] b = (2 ^ a) * b from this _ _
intro a b; induction a <;>
simp [*, Function.iterate_succ, pow_succ, mul_assoc, -Function.iterate_succ]
/-- We can extend the fast growing hierarchy one more step to `ε₀` itself, using `ω ^ (ω ^ (⋯ ^ ω))`
as the fundamental sequence converging to `ε₀` (which is not an `ONote`). Extending the fast
growing hierarchy beyond this requires a definition of fundamental sequence for larger ordinals. -/
def fastGrowingε₀ (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
fastGrowing ((fun a => a.oadd 1 0)^[i] 0) i
theorem fastGrowingε₀_zero : fastGrowingε₀ 0 = 1 := by simp [fastGrowingε₀]
theorem fastGrowingε₀_one : fastGrowingε₀ 1 = 2 := by
simp [fastGrowingε₀, show oadd 0 1 0 = 1 from rfl]
theorem fastGrowingε₀_two : fastGrowingε₀ 2 = 2048 := by
norm_num [fastGrowingε₀, show oadd 0 1 0 = 1 from rfl, @fastGrowing_limit (oadd 1 1 0) _ rfl,
show oadd 0 (2 : Nat).succPNat 0 = 3 from rfl, @fastGrowing_succ 3 2 rfl]
end ONote
/-- The type of normal ordinal notations.
It would have been nicer to define this right in the inductive type, but `NF o` requires `repr`
which requires `ONote`, so all these things would have to be defined at once, which messes up the VM
representation. -/
def NONote :=
{ o : ONote // o.NF }
instance : DecidableEq NONote := by unfold NONote; infer_instance
namespace NONote
open ONote
instance NF (o : NONote) : NF o.1 :=
o.2
/-- Construct a `NONote` from an ordinal notation (and infer normality) -/
def mk (o : ONote) [h : ONote.NF o] : NONote :=
⟨o, h⟩
/-- The ordinal represented by an ordinal notation.
This function is noncomputable because ordinal arithmetic is noncomputable. In computational
applications `NONote` can be used exclusively without reference to `Ordinal`, but this function
allows for correctness results to be stated. -/
noncomputable def repr (o : NONote) : Ordinal :=
o.1.repr
instance : ToString NONote :=
⟨fun x => x.1.toString⟩
instance : Repr NONote :=
⟨fun x prec => x.1.repr' prec⟩
instance : Preorder NONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
| instance : Zero NONote :=
⟨⟨0, NF.zero⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited NONote :=
⟨0⟩
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded NONote (· < ·) :=
InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedLT NONote :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 1,173 | 1,184 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.List.Zip
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Range
/-!
# The powerset of a multiset
-/
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### powerset -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: Write a more efficient version
/-- A helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` as multisets. -/
def powersetAux (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists l).map (↑)
theorem powersetAux_eq_map_coe {l : List α} : powersetAux l = (sublists l).map (↑) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetAux {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetAux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp [powersetAux_eq_map_coe, Subperm, and_comm]
/-- Helper function for the powerset of a multiset. Given a list `l`, returns a list
of sublists of `l` (using `sublists'`), as multisets. -/
def powersetAux' (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists' l).map (↑)
theorem powersetAux_perm_powersetAux' {l : List α} : powersetAux l ~ powersetAux' l := by
rw [powersetAux_eq_map_coe]; exact (sublists_perm_sublists' _).map _
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_nil : powersetAux' (@nil α) = [0] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
powersetAux' (a :: l) = powersetAux' l ++ List.map (cons a) (powersetAux' l) := by
simp [powersetAux']
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux' l₁ ~ powersetAux' l₂ := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ IH =>
simp only [powersetAux'_cons]
exact IH.append (IH.map _)
| swap a b =>
simp only [powersetAux'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_assoc]
apply Perm.append_left
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
| trans _ _ IH₁ IH₂ => exact IH₁.trans IH₂
theorem powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux l₁ ~ powersetAux l₂ :=
powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.trans <|
(powerset_aux'_perm p).trans powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.symm
--Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11083): slightly slower implementation due to `map ofList`
/-- The power set of a multiset. -/
def powerset (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s
(fun l => (powersetAux l : Multiset (Multiset α)))
(fun _ _ h => Quot.sound (powersetAux_perm h))
theorem powerset_coe (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
congr_arg ((↑) : List (Multiset α) → Multiset (Multiset α)) powersetAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem powerset_coe' (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists' l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
Quot.sound powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
@[simp]
theorem powerset_zero : @powerset α 0 = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powerset_cons (a : α) (s) : powerset (a ::ₘ s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {s t : Multiset α} : s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t <| by simp [Subperm, and_comm]
theorem map_single_le_powerset (s : Multiset α) : s.map singleton ≤ powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [powerset_coe, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_le, map_coe]
show l.map (((↑) : List α → Multiset α) ∘ pure) <+~ (sublists l).map (↑)
rw [← List.map_map]
exact ((map_pure_sublist_sublists _).map _).subperm
@[simp]
theorem card_powerset (s : Multiset α) : card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp
theorem revzip_powersetAux {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux l)) : x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux_eq_map_coe, ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists _ _ _ h)
theorem revzip_powersetAux' {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux' l)) :
x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux', ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists' _ _ _ h)
| theorem revzip_powersetAux_lemma {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {l' : List (Multiset α)}
(H : ∀ ⦃x : _ × _⦄, x ∈ revzip l' → x.1 + x.2 = ↑l) :
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Powerset.lean | 121 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Results on finitely supported functions.
* `TensorProduct.finsuppLeft`, the tensor product of `ι →₀ M` and `N`
is linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ M ⊗[R] N`
* `TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft`, the tensor product of `ι →₀ R` and `N`
is linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ N`
* `TensorProduct.finsuppRight`, the tensor product of `M` and `ι →₀ N`
is linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ M ⊗[R] N`
* `TensorProduct.finsuppScalarRight`, the tensor product of `M` and `ι →₀ R`
is linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ N`
* `TensorProduct.finsuppLeft'`, if `M` is an `S`-module,
then the tensor product of `ι →₀ M` and `N` is `S`-linearly equivalent
to `ι →₀ M ⊗[R] N`
* `finsuppTensorFinsupp`, the tensor product of `ι →₀ M` and `κ →₀ N`
is linearly equivalent to `(ι × κ) →₀ (M ⊗ N)`.
## Case of MvPolynomial
These functions apply to `MvPolynomial`, one can define
```
noncomputable def MvPolynomial.rTensor' :
MvPolynomial σ S ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[S] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ (S ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.finsuppLeft'
noncomputable def MvPolynomial.rTensor :
MvPolynomial σ R ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ N :=
TensorProduct.finsuppScalarLeft
```
However, to be actually usable, these definitions need lemmas to be given in companion PR.
## Case of `Polynomial`
`Polynomial` is a structure containing a `Finsupp`, so these functions
can't be applied directly to `Polynomial`.
Some linear equivs need to be added to mathlib for that.
This belongs to a companion PR.
## TODO
* generalize to `MonoidAlgebra`, `AlgHom `
* reprove `TensorProduct.finsuppLeft'` using existing heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.congr`
-/
noncomputable section
open DirectSum TensorProduct
open Set LinearMap Submodule
section TensorProduct
variable (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
(M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
(N : Type*) [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace TensorProduct
variable (ι : Type*) [DecidableEq ι]
/-- The tensor product of `ι →₀ M` and `N` is linearly equivalent to `ι →₀ M ⊗[R] N` -/
noncomputable def finsuppLeft :
(ι →₀ M) ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ M ⊗[R] N :=
congr (finsuppLEquivDirectSum R M ι) (.refl R N) ≪≫ₗ
directSumLeft R (fun _ ↦ M) N ≪≫ₗ (finsuppLEquivDirectSum R _ ι).symm
variable {R M N ι}
lemma finsuppLeft_apply_tmul (p : ι →₀ M) (n : N) :
finsuppLeft R M N ι (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) = p.sum fun i m ↦ Finsupp.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] n) := by
induction p using Finsupp.induction_linear with
| zero => simp
| add f g hf hg => simp [add_tmul, map_add, hf, hg, Finsupp.sum_add_index]
| single => simp [finsuppLeft]
@[simp]
lemma finsuppLeft_apply_tmul_apply (p : ι →₀ M) (n : N) (i : ι) :
finsuppLeft R M N ι (p ⊗ₜ[R] n) i = p i ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
rw [finsuppLeft_apply_tmul, Finsupp.sum_apply,
Finsupp.sum_eq_single i (fun _ _ ↦ Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne) (by simp), Finsupp.single_eq_same]
theorem finsuppLeft_apply (t : (ι →₀ M) ⊗[R] N) (i : ι) :
finsuppLeft R M N ι t i = rTensor N (Finsupp.lapply i) t := by
induction t with
| zero => simp
| tmul f n => simp only [finsuppLeft_apply_tmul_apply, rTensor_tmul, Finsupp.lapply_apply]
| add x y hx hy => simp [map_add, hx, hy]
@[simp]
lemma finsuppLeft_symm_apply_single (i : ι) (m : M) (n : N) :
| (finsuppLeft R M N ι).symm (Finsupp.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] n)) =
Finsupp.single i m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
simp [finsuppLeft, Finsupp.lsum]
variable (R M N ι)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/DirectSum/Finsupp.lean | 109 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Paul A. Reichert. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul A. Reichert
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Convex bodies
This file contains the definition of the type `ConvexBody V`
consisting of
convex, compact, nonempty subsets of a real topological vector space `V`.
`ConvexBody V` is a module over the nonnegative reals (`NNReal`) and a pseudo-metric space.
If `V` is a normed space, `ConvexBody V` is a metric space.
## TODO
- define positive convex bodies, requiring the interior to be nonempty
- introduce support sets
- Characterise the interaction of the distance with algebraic operations, eg
`dist (a • K) (a • L) = ‖a‖ * dist K L`, `dist (a +ᵥ K) (a +ᵥ L) = dist K L`
## Tags
convex, convex body
-/
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
variable {V : Type*}
/-- Let `V` be a real topological vector space. A subset of `V` is a convex body if and only if
it is convex, compact, and nonempty.
-/
structure ConvexBody (V : Type*) [TopologicalSpace V] [AddCommMonoid V] [SMul ℝ V] where
/-- The **carrier set** underlying a convex body: the set of points contained in it -/
carrier : Set V
/-- A convex body has convex carrier set -/
convex' : Convex ℝ carrier
/-- A convex body has compact carrier set -/
isCompact' : IsCompact carrier
/-- A convex body has non-empty carrier set -/
nonempty' : carrier.Nonempty
namespace ConvexBody
section TVS
variable [TopologicalSpace V] [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℝ V]
instance : SetLike (ConvexBody V) V where
coe := ConvexBody.carrier
coe_injective' K L h := by
cases K
cases L
congr
protected theorem convex (K : ConvexBody V) : Convex ℝ (K : Set V) :=
K.convex'
protected theorem isCompact (K : ConvexBody V) : IsCompact (K : Set V) :=
K.isCompact'
protected theorem isClosed [T2Space V] (K : ConvexBody V) : IsClosed (K : Set V) :=
K.isCompact.isClosed
protected theorem nonempty (K : ConvexBody V) : (K : Set V).Nonempty :=
K.nonempty'
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {K L : ConvexBody V} (h : (K : Set V) = L) : K = L :=
SetLike.ext' h
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (s : Set V) (h₁ h₂ h₃) : (mk s h₁ h₂ h₃ : Set V) = s :=
rfl
/-- A convex body that is symmetric contains `0`. -/
theorem zero_mem_of_symmetric (K : ConvexBody V) (h_symm : ∀ x ∈ K, -x ∈ K) : 0 ∈ K := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := K.nonempty
rw [show 0 = (1/2 : ℝ) • x + (1/2 : ℝ) • (- x) by field_simp]
apply convex_iff_forall_pos.mp K.convex hx (h_symm x hx)
all_goals linarith
section ContinuousAdd
| instance : Zero (ConvexBody V) where
zero := ⟨0, convex_singleton 0, isCompact_singleton, Set.singleton_nonempty 0⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note: add norm_cast; we leave it out for now to reproduce mathlib3 behavior.
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ConvexBody V) : Set V) = 0 :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Body.lean | 92 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Topology on the set of filters on a type
This file introduces a topology on `Filter α`. It is generated by the sets
`Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`, `s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and
only if it is a union of a family of these basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`.
This topology has the following important properties.
* If `X` is a topological space, then the map `𝓝 : X → Filter X` is a topology inducing map.
* In particular, it is a continuous map, so `𝓝 ∘ f` tends to `𝓝 (𝓝 a)` whenever `f` tends to `𝓝 a`.
* If `X` is an ordered topological space with order topology and no max element, then `𝓝 ∘ f` tends
to `𝓝 Filter.atTop` whenever `f` tends to `Filter.atTop`.
* It turns `Filter X` into a T₀ space and the order on `Filter X` is the dual of the
`specializationOrder (Filter X)`.
## Tags
filter, topological space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open Filter Topology
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β X Y : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-- The topology on `Filter α` is generated by the sets `Set.Iic (𝓟 s) = {l : Filter α | s ∈ l}`,
`s : Set α`. A set `s : Set (Filter α)` is open if and only if it is a union of a family of these
basic open sets, see `Filter.isOpen_iff`. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace (Filter α) :=
generateFrom <| range <| Iic ∘ 𝓟
theorem isOpen_Iic_principal {s : Set α} : IsOpen (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
GenerateOpen.basic _ (mem_range_self _)
theorem isOpen_setOf_mem {s : Set α} : IsOpen { l : Filter α | s ∈ l } := by
simpa only [Iic_principal] using isOpen_Iic_principal
theorem isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal :
IsTopologicalBasis (range (Iic ∘ 𝓟 : Set α → Set (Filter α))) :=
{ exists_subset_inter := by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩ l hl
exact ⟨Iic (𝓟 s) ∩ Iic (𝓟 t), ⟨s ∩ t, by simp⟩, hl, Subset.rfl⟩
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun _ => ⟨Iic ⊤, ⟨univ, congr_arg Iic principal_univ⟩,
mem_Iic.2 le_top⟩
eq_generateFrom := rfl }
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (Filter α)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∃ T : Set (Set α), s = ⋃ t ∈ T, Iic (𝓟 t) :=
isTopologicalBasis_Iic_principal.open_iff_eq_sUnion.trans <| by
simp only [exists_subset_range_and_iff, sUnion_image, (· ∘ ·)]
theorem nhds_eq (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' (Iic ∘ 𝓟) :=
nhds_generateFrom.trans <| by
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (l ∈ _), iInf_and, iInf_range, Filter.lift', Filter.lift,
(· ∘ ·), mem_Iic, le_principal_iff]
theorem nhds_eq' (l : Filter α) : 𝓝 l = l.lift' fun s => { l' | s ∈ l' } := by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, Iic_principal] using nhds_eq l
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {f : α → Filter β} :
Tendsto f la (𝓝 lb) ↔ ∀ s ∈ lb, ∀ᶠ a in la, s ∈ f a := by
simp only [nhds_eq', tendsto_lift', mem_setOf_eq]
protected theorem HasBasis.nhds {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => Iic (𝓟 (s i)) := by
rw [nhds_eq]
exact h.lift' monotone_principal.Iic
protected theorem tendsto_pure_self (l : Filter X) :
Tendsto (pure : X → Filter X) l (𝓝 l) := by
rw [Filter.tendsto_nhds]
exact fun s hs ↦ Eventually.mono hs fun x ↦ id
/-- Neighborhoods of a countably generated filter is a countably generated filter. -/
instance {l : Filter α} [IsCountablyGenerated l] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 l) :=
let ⟨_b, hb⟩ := l.exists_antitone_basis
HasCountableBasis.isCountablyGenerated <| ⟨hb.nhds, Set.to_countable _⟩
theorem HasBasis.nhds' {l : Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis (𝓝 l) p fun i => { l' | s i ∈ l' } := by simpa only [Iic_principal] using h.nhds
protected theorem mem_nhds_iff {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, Iic (𝓟 t) ⊆ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds.mem_iff
theorem mem_nhds_iff' {l : Filter α} {S : Set (Filter α)} :
S ∈ 𝓝 l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, ∀ ⦃l' : Filter α⦄, t ∈ l' → l' ∈ S :=
l.basis_sets.nhds'.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bot : 𝓝 (⊥ : Filter α) = pure ⊥ := by
simp [nhds_eq, Function.comp_def, lift'_bot monotone_principal.Iic]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ := by simp [nhds_eq]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_principal (s : Set α) : 𝓝 (𝓟 s) = 𝓟 (Iic (𝓟 s)) :=
(hasBasis_principal s).nhds.eq_of_same_basis (hasBasis_principal _)
@[simp]
theorem nhds_pure (x : α) : 𝓝 (pure x : Filter α) = 𝓟 {⊥, pure x} := by
rw [← principal_singleton, nhds_principal, principal_singleton, Iic_pure]
@[simp]
protected theorem nhds_iInf (f : ι → Filter α) : 𝓝 (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, 𝓝 (f i) := by
simp only [nhds_eq]
apply lift'_iInf_of_map_univ <;> simp
@[simp]
protected theorem nhds_inf (l₁ l₂ : Filter α) : 𝓝 (l₁ ⊓ l₂) = 𝓝 l₁ ⊓ 𝓝 l₂ := by
simpa only [iInf_bool_eq] using Filter.nhds_iInf fun b => cond b l₁ l₂
theorem monotone_nhds : Monotone (𝓝 : Filter α → Filter (Filter α)) :=
Monotone.of_map_inf Filter.nhds_inf
theorem sInter_nhds (l : Filter α) : ⋂₀ { s | s ∈ 𝓝 l } = Iic l := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq, Function.comp_def, sInter_lift'_sets monotone_principal.Iic, Iic,
le_principal_iff, ← setOf_forall, ← Filter.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_mono {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : 𝓝 l₁ ≤ 𝓝 l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => monotone_nhds h⟩
rw [← Iic_subset_Iic, ← sInter_nhds, ← sInter_nhds]
exact sInter_subset_sInter h
protected theorem mem_interior {s : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} :
l ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, Iic (𝓟 t) ⊆ s := by
| rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Filter.mem_nhds_iff]
| Mathlib/Topology/Filter.lean | 145 | 146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Defs
/-!
# Basic kernels
This file contains basic results about kernels in general and definitions of some particular
kernels.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f)`:
kernel `a ↦ Measure.dirac (f a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.id`: the identity kernel, deterministic kernel for
the identity function.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.copy α`: the deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to
the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.discard α`: the Markov kernel to the type `Unit`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.swap α β`: the deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to
the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.const α (μβ : measure β)`: constant kernel `a ↦ μβ`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.restrict κ (hs : MeasurableSet s)`: kernel for which the image of
`a : α` is `(κ a).restrict s`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(κ.restrict hs a) = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂(κ a)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight`: Kernel with value `(κ a).comap f`,
for a measurable embedding `f`. That is, for a measurable set `t : Set β`,
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comapRight κ hf a t = κ a (f '' t)`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.piecewise (hs : MeasurableSet s) κ η`: the kernel equal to `κ`
on the measurable set `s` and to `η` on its complement.
## Main statements
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open MeasureTheory
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {κ : Kernel α β}
namespace Kernel
section Deterministic
/-- Kernel which to `a` associates the dirac measure at `f a`. This is a Markov kernel. -/
noncomputable def deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := Measure.dirac (f a)
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator (hf hs)
theorem deterministic_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
deterministic f hf a = Measure.dirac (f a) :=
rfl
theorem deterministic_apply' {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : deterministic f hf a s = s.indicator (fun _ => 1) (f a) := by
rw [deterministic]
change Measure.dirac (f a) s = s.indicator 1 (f a)
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
/-- Because of the measurability field in `Kernel.deterministic`, `rw [h]` will not rewrite
`deterministic f hf` to `deterministic g ⋯`. Instead one can do `rw [deterministic_congr h]`. -/
theorem deterministic_congr {f g : α → β} {hf : Measurable f} (h : f = g) :
deterministic f hf = deterministic g (h ▸ hf) := by
conv_lhs => enter [1]; rw [h]
instance isMarkovKernel_deterministic {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMarkovKernel (deterministic f hf) :=
⟨fun a => by rw [deterministic_apply hf]; infer_instance⟩
theorem lintegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac (g a) f]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac' hf hs]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] (s : Set β) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by
rw [deterministic_apply, setLIntegral_dirac f s]
end Deterministic
section Id
/-- The identity kernel, that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `x`. -/
protected noncomputable
def id : Kernel α α := Kernel.deterministic id measurable_id
instance : IsMarkovKernel (Kernel.id : Kernel α α) := by rw [Kernel.id]; infer_instance
lemma id_apply (a : α) : Kernel.id a = Measure.dirac a := by
rw [Kernel.id, deterministic_apply, id_def]
lemma lintegral_id' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
lemma lintegral_id [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (a : α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(@Kernel.id α mα a) = f a := by
rw [id_apply, lintegral_dirac]
end Id
section Copy
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `x : α` to the Dirac measure at `(x, x) : α × α`. -/
noncomputable
def copy (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α (α × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (measurable_id.prod measurable_id)
instance : IsMarkovKernel (copy α) := by rw [copy]; infer_instance
lemma copy_apply (a : α) : copy α a = Measure.dirac (a, a) := by simp [copy, deterministic_apply]
end Copy
section Discard
/-- The Markov kernel to the `Unit` type. -/
noncomputable
def discard (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Kernel α Unit :=
Kernel.deterministic (fun _ ↦ ()) measurable_const
instance : IsMarkovKernel (discard α) := by rw [discard]; infer_instance
@[simp]
lemma discard_apply (a : α) : discard α a = Measure.dirac () := deterministic_apply _ _
end Discard
section Swap
/-- The deterministic kernel that maps `(x, y)` to the Dirac measure at `(y, x)`. -/
noncomputable
def swap (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] : Kernel (α × β) (β × α) :=
Kernel.deterministic Prod.swap measurable_swap
instance : IsMarkovKernel (swap α β) := by rw [swap]; infer_instance
/-- See `swap_apply'` for a fully applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply (ab : α × β) : swap α β ab = Measure.dirac ab.swap := by
rw [swap, deterministic_apply]
/-- See `swap_apply` for a partially applied version of this lemma. -/
lemma swap_apply' (ab : α × β) {s : Set (β × α)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
swap α β ab s = s.indicator 1 ab.swap := by
rw [swap_apply, Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
end Swap
section Const
/-- Constant kernel, which always returns the same measure. -/
def const (α : Type*) {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} (μβ : Measure β) :
Kernel α β where
toFun _ := μβ
measurable' := measurable_const
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (μβ : Measure β) (a : α) : const α μβ a = μβ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma const_zero : const α (0 : Measure β) = 0 := by
ext x s _; simp [const_apply]
lemma const_add (β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace β] (μ ν : Measure α) :
const β (μ + ν) = const β μ + const β ν := by ext; simp
lemma sum_const [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure β) :
Kernel.sum (fun n ↦ const α (μ n)) = const α (Measure.sum μ) := rfl
instance const.instIsFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [IsFiniteMeasure μβ] :
IsFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨⟨μβ Set.univ, measure_lt_top _ _, fun _ => le_rfl⟩⟩
instance const.instIsSFiniteKernel {μβ : Measure β} [SFinite μβ] :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun n ↦ const α (sfiniteSeq μβ n), fun n ↦ inferInstance, by rw [sum_const, sum_sfiniteSeq]⟩
instance const.instIsMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsMarkovKernel (const α μβ) :=
⟨fun _ => hμβ⟩
instance const.instIsZeroOrMarkovKernel {μβ : Measure β} [hμβ : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure μβ] :
IsZeroOrMarkovKernel (const α μβ) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_isProbabilityMeasure μβ with rfl | h
· simp only [const_zero]
infer_instance
· infer_instance
lemma isSFiniteKernel_const [Nonempty α] {μβ : Measure β} :
IsSFiniteKernel (const α μβ) ↔ SFinite μβ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.sFinite (Classical.arbitrary α), fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure β} {a : α} :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂const α μ a = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [const_apply]
@[simp]
theorem setLIntegral_const {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure β} {a : α} {s : Set β} :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂const α μ a = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by rw [const_apply]
end Const
/-- In a countable space with measurable singletons, every function `α → MeasureTheory.Measure β`
defines a kernel. -/
def ofFunOfCountable [MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [Countable α]
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → Measure β) : Kernel α β where
toFun := f
measurable' := measurable_of_countable f
section Restrict
variable {s t : Set β}
/-- Kernel given by the restriction of the measures in the image of a kernel to a set. -/
protected noncomputable def restrict (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Kernel α β where
toFun a := (κ a).restrict s
measurable' := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun t ht => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht]
exact Kernel.measurable_coe κ (ht.inter hs)
theorem restrict_apply (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) :
κ.restrict hs a = (κ a).restrict s :=
rfl
theorem restrict_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
κ.restrict hs a t = (κ a) (t ∩ s) := by
rw [restrict_apply κ hs a, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : κ.restrict MeasurableSet.univ = κ := by
ext1 a
rw [Kernel.restrict_apply, Measure.restrict_univ]
@[simp]
| theorem lintegral_restrict (κ : Kernel α β) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (a : α) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ.restrict hs a = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂κ a := by rw [restrict_apply]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean | 259 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym] at h
exact legendreSym.prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the first argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_left {l : List ℤ} {n : ℕ} : J(l.prod | n) = (l.map fun a => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, List.map_nil, one_left]
| cons n l' ih => rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_left, ih]
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the second argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_right {a : ℤ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ n ∈ l, n ≠ 0) :
J(a | l.prod) = (l.map fun n => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, one_right, List.map_nil]
| cons n l' ih =>
have hn := hl n List.mem_cons_self
-- `n ≠ 0`
have hl' := List.prod_ne_zero fun hf => hl 0 (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hf) rfl
-- `l'.prod ≠ 0`
have h := fun m hm => hl m (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hm)
-- `∀ (m : ℕ), m ∈ l' → m ≠ 0`
rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_right' a hn hl', ih h]
/-- If `J(a | n) = -1`, then `n` has a prime divisor `p` such that `J(a | p) = -1`. -/
theorem eq_neg_one_at_prime_divisor_of_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (h : J(a | n) = -1) :
∃ p : ℕ, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ J(a | p) = -1 := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_right, CharZero.eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
have hf₀ (p) (hp : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList) : p ≠ 0 := (Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp).ne.symm
rw [← Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hn₀, list_prod_right hf₀] at h
obtain ⟨p, hmem, hj⟩ := List.mem_map.mp (List.neg_one_mem_of_prod_eq_neg_one h)
exact ⟨p, Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hmem, hj⟩
end jacobiSym
namespace ZMod
open jacobiSym
/-- If `J(a | b)` is `-1`, then `a` is not a square modulo `b`. -/
theorem nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : J(a | b) = -1) :
¬IsSquare (a : ZMod b) := fun ⟨r, ha⟩ => by
rw [← r.coe_valMinAbs, ← Int.cast_mul, intCast_eq_intCast_iff', ← sq] at ha
apply (by norm_num : ¬(0 : ℤ) ≤ -1)
rw [← h, mod_left, ha, ← mod_left, pow_left]
apply sq_nonneg
/-- If `p` is prime, then `J(a | p)` is `-1` iff `a` is not a square modulo `p`. -/
theorem nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] :
J(a | p) = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym]
exact legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff p
/-- If `p` is prime and `J(a | p) = 1`, then `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
theorem isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one {a : ℤ} {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (h : J(a | p) = 1) :
IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
Classical.not_not.mp <| by rw [← nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one, h]; decide
end ZMod
/-!
### Values at `-1`, `2` and `-2`
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- If `χ` is a multiplicative function such that `J(a | p) = χ p` for all odd primes `p`,
then `J(a | b)` equals `χ b` for all odd natural numbers `b`. -/
theorem value_at (a : ℤ) {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (χ : R →* ℤ)
(hp : ∀ (p : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime), p ≠ 2 → @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a = χ p) {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) :
J(a | b) = χ b := by
conv_rhs => rw [← prod_primeFactorsList hb.pos.ne', cast_list_prod, map_list_prod χ]
rw [jacobiSym, List.map_map, ← List.pmap_eq_map
fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList]
congr 1; apply List.pmap_congr_left
exact fun p h pp _ => hp p pp (hb.ne_two_of_dvd_nat <| dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)
| /-- If `b` is odd, then `J(-1 | b)` is given by `χ₄ b`. -/
theorem at_neg_one {b : ℕ} (hb : Odd b) : J(-1 | b) = χ₄ b :=
-- Porting note: In mathlib3, it was written `χ₄` and Lean could guess that it had to use
-- `χ₄.to_monoid_hom`. This is not the case with Lean 4.
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 308 | 311 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Grothendieck topologies
Definition and lemmas about Grothendieck topologies.
A Grothendieck topology for a category `C` is a set of sieves on each object `X` satisfying
certain closure conditions.
Alternate versions of the axioms (in arrow form) are also described.
Two explicit examples of Grothendieck topologies are given:
* The dense topology
* The atomic topology
as well as the complete lattice structure on Grothendieck topologies (which gives two additional
explicit topologies: the discrete and trivial topologies.)
A pretopology, or a basis for a topology is defined in
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Pretopology.lean`. The topology associated
to a topological space is defined in `Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Spaces.lean`.
## Tags
Grothendieck topology, coverage, pretopology, site
## References
* [nLab, *Grothendieck topology*](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+topology)
* [S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, *Sheaves in Geometry and Logic*][MM92]
## Implementation notes
We use the definition of [nlab] and [MM92][] (Chapter III, Section 2), where Grothendieck topologies
are saturated collections of morphisms, rather than the notions of the Stacks project (00VG) and
the Elephant, in which topologies are allowed to be unsaturated, and are then completed.
TODO (BM): Add the definition from Stacks, as a pretopology, and complete to a topology.
This is so that we can produce a bijective correspondence between Grothendieck topologies on a
small category and Lawvere-Tierney topologies on its presheaf topos, as well as the equivalence
between Grothendieck topoi and left exact reflective subcategories of presheaf toposes.
-/
universe v₁ u₁ v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The definition of a Grothendieck topology: a set of sieves `J X` on each object `X` satisfying
three axioms:
1. For every object `X`, the maximal sieve is in `J X`.
2. If `S ∈ J X` then its pullback along any `h : Y ⟶ X` is in `J Y`.
3. If `S ∈ J X` and `R` is a sieve on `X`, then provided that the pullback of `R` along any arrow
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S` is in `J Y`, we have that `R` itself is in `J X`.
A sieve `S` on `X` is referred to as `J`-covering, (or just covering), if `S ∈ J X`.
See also [nlab] or [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1. -/
@[stacks 00Z4]
structure GrothendieckTopology where
/-- A Grothendieck topology on `C` consists of a set of sieves for each object `X`,
which satisfy some axioms. -/
sieves : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)
/-- The sieves associated to each object must contain the top sieve.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.top_mem`. -/
top_mem' : ∀ X, ⊤ ∈ sieves X
/-- Stability under pullback. Use `GrothendieckTopology.pullback_stable`. -/
pullback_stable' : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S ∈ sieves X → S.pullback f ∈ sieves Y
/-- Transitivity of sieves in a Grothendieck topology.
Use `GrothendieckTopology.transitive`. -/
transitive' :
∀ ⦃X⦄ ⦃S : Sieve X⦄ (_ : S ∈ sieves X) (R : Sieve X),
(∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → R.pullback f ∈ sieves Y) → R ∈ sieves X
namespace GrothendieckTopology
instance : DFunLike (GrothendieckTopology C) C (fun X ↦ Set (Sieve X)) where
coe J X := sieves J X
coe_injective' J₁ J₂ h := by cases J₁; cases J₂; congr
variable {C}
variable {X Y : C} {S R : Sieve X}
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
/-- An extensionality lemma in terms of the coercion to a pi-type.
We prove this explicitly rather than deriving it so that it is in terms of the coercion rather than
the projection `.sieves`.
-/
@[ext]
theorem ext {J₁ J₂ : GrothendieckTopology C} (h : (J₁ : ∀ X : C, Set (Sieve X)) = J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h
@[simp]
theorem mem_sieves_iff_coe : S ∈ J.sieves X ↔ S ∈ J X :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Also known as the maximality axiom. -/
@[simp]
theorem top_mem (X : C) : ⊤ ∈ J X :=
J.top_mem' X
/-- Also known as the stability axiom. -/
@[simp]
theorem pullback_stable (f : Y ⟶ X) (hS : S ∈ J X) : S.pullback f ∈ J Y :=
J.pullback_stable' f hS
variable {J} in
@[simp]
lemma pullback_mem_iff_of_isIso {i : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso i] {S : Sieve Y} :
S.pullback i ∈ J _ ↔ S ∈ J _ := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, J.pullback_stable i⟩
convert J.pullback_stable (inv i) H
rw [← Sieve.pullback_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Sieve.pullback_id]
theorem transitive (hS : S ∈ J X) (R : Sieve X) (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → R.pullback f ∈ J Y) :
R ∈ J X :=
J.transitive' hS R h
theorem covering_of_eq_top : S = ⊤ → S ∈ J X := fun h => h.symm ▸ J.top_mem X
/-- If `S` is a subset of `R`, and `S` is covering, then `R` is covering as well.
See also discussion after [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1. -/
@[stacks 00Z5 "(2)"]
theorem superset_covering (Hss : S ≤ R) (sjx : S ∈ J X) : R ∈ J X := by
apply J.transitive sjx R fun Y f hf => _
intros Y f hf
apply covering_of_eq_top
rw [← top_le_iff, ← S.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hf]
apply Sieve.pullback_monotone _ Hss
/-- The intersection of two covering sieves is covering.
See also [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, Definition 1 (iv). -/
@[stacks 00Z5 "(1)"]
theorem intersection_covering (rj : R ∈ J X) (sj : S ∈ J X) : R ⊓ S ∈ J X := by
apply J.transitive rj _ fun Y f Hf => _
intros Y f hf
rw [Sieve.pullback_inter, R.pullback_eq_top_of_mem hf]
simp [sj]
@[simp]
theorem intersection_covering_iff : R ⊓ S ∈ J X ↔ R ∈ J X ∧ S ∈ J X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨J.superset_covering inf_le_left h, J.superset_covering inf_le_right h⟩, fun t =>
intersection_covering _ t.1 t.2⟩
theorem bind_covering {S : Sieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y} (hS : S ∈ J X)
(hR : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (H : S f), R H ∈ J Y) : Sieve.bind S R ∈ J X :=
J.transitive hS _ fun _ f hf => superset_covering J (Sieve.le_pullback_bind S R f hf) (hR hf)
/-- The sieve `S` on `X` `J`-covers an arrow `f` to `X` if `S.pullback f ∈ J Y`.
This definition is an alternate way of presenting a Grothendieck topology.
-/
def Covers (S : Sieve X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : Prop :=
S.pullback f ∈ J Y
theorem covers_iff (S : Sieve X) (f : Y ⟶ X) : J.Covers S f ↔ S.pullback f ∈ J Y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem covering_iff_covers_id (S : Sieve X) : S ∈ J X ↔ J.Covers S (𝟙 X) := by simp [covers_iff]
/-- The maximality axiom in 'arrow' form: Any arrow `f` in `S` is covered by `S`. -/
theorem arrow_max (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) (hf : S f) : J.Covers S f := by
rw [Covers, (Sieve.mem_iff_pullback_eq_top f).1 hf]
apply J.top_mem
/-- The stability axiom in 'arrow' form: If `S` covers `f` then `S` covers `g ≫ f` for any `g`. -/
theorem arrow_stable (f : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) (h : J.Covers S f) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
J.Covers S (g ≫ f) := by
rw [covers_iff] at h ⊢
simp [h, Sieve.pullback_comp]
/-- The transitivity axiom in 'arrow' form: If `S` covers `f` and every arrow in `S` is covered by
`R`, then `R` covers `f`.
-/
theorem arrow_trans (f : Y ⟶ X) (S R : Sieve X) (h : J.Covers S f) :
(∀ {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X), S g → J.Covers R g) → J.Covers R f := by
intro k
apply J.transitive h
intro Z g hg
rw [← Sieve.pullback_comp]
apply k (g ≫ f) hg
theorem arrow_intersect (f : Y ⟶ X) (S R : Sieve X) (hS : J.Covers S f) (hR : J.Covers R f) :
J.Covers (S ⊓ R) f := by simpa [covers_iff] using And.intro hS hR
variable (C)
/-- The trivial Grothendieck topology, in which only the maximal sieve is covering. This topology is
also known as the indiscrete, coarse, or chaotic topology.
See [MM92] Chapter III, Section 2, example (a), or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grothendieck_topology#The_discrete_and_indiscrete_topologies
| -/
def trivial : GrothendieckTopology C where
sieves _ := {⊤}
top_mem' _ := rfl
pullback_stable' X Y S f hf := by
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hf ⊢
simp [hf]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Grothendieck.lean | 206 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
| rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 607 | 609 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
| /-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 189 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Shogo Saito. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shogo Saito. Adapted for mathlib by Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
/-!
# Chinese Remainder Theorem
This file provides definitions and theorems for the Chinese Remainder Theorem. These are used in
Gödel's Beta function, which is used in proving Gödel's incompleteness theorems.
## Main result
- `chineseRemainderOfList`: Definition of the Chinese remainder of a list
## Tags
Chinese Remainder Theorem, Gödel, beta function
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace Nat
variable {ι : Type*}
lemma modEq_list_prod_iff {a b} {l : List ℕ} (co : l.Pairwise Coprime) :
a ≡ b [MOD l.prod] ↔ ∀ i, a ≡ b [MOD l.get i] := by
induction' l with m l ih
· simp [modEq_one]
· have : Coprime m l.prod := coprime_list_prod_right_iff.mpr (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1
simp only [List.prod_cons, ← modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul this, ih (List.Pairwise.of_cons co),
List.length_cons]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h0, hs⟩ i
cases i using Fin.cases <;> simp_all
· intro h; exact ⟨h 0, fun i => h i.succ⟩
lemma modEq_list_prod_iff' {a b} {s : ι → ℕ} {l : List ι} (co : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s)) :
a ≡ b [MOD (l.map s).prod] ↔ ∀ i ∈ l, a ≡ b [MOD s i] := by
induction' l with i l ih
· simp [modEq_one]
· have : Coprime (s i) (l.map s).prod := by
simp only [coprime_list_prod_right_iff, List.mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro j hj
exact (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1 j hj
simp [← modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul this, ih (List.Pairwise.of_cons co)]
variable (a s : ι → ℕ)
/-- The natural number less than `(l.map s).prod` congruent to
`a i` mod `s i` for all `i ∈ l`. -/
def chineseRemainderOfList : (l : List ι) → l.Pairwise (Coprime on s) →
{ k // ∀ i ∈ l, k ≡ a i [MOD s i] }
| [], _ => ⟨0, by simp⟩
| i :: l, co => by
have : Coprime (s i) (l.map s).prod := by
simp only [coprime_list_prod_right_iff, List.mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro j hj
exact (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1 j hj
have ih := chineseRemainderOfList l co.of_cons
have k := chineseRemainder this (a i) ih
use k
simp only [List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp, k.prop.1, true_and]
intro j hj
exact ((modEq_list_prod_iff' co.of_cons).mp k.prop.2 j hj).trans (ih.prop j hj)
@[simp] theorem chineseRemainderOfList_nil :
(chineseRemainderOfList a s [] List.Pairwise.nil : ℕ) = 0 := rfl
theorem chineseRemainderOfList_lt_prod (l : List ι)
(co : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s)) (hs : ∀ i ∈ l, s i ≠ 0) :
chineseRemainderOfList a s l co < (l.map s).prod := by
cases l with
| nil => simp
| cons i l =>
simp only [chineseRemainderOfList, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
have : Coprime (s i) (l.map s).prod := by
simp only [coprime_list_prod_right_iff, List.mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro j hj
exact (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1 j hj
refine chineseRemainder_lt_mul this (a i) (chineseRemainderOfList a s l co.of_cons)
(hs i List.mem_cons_self) ?_
simp only [ne_eq, List.prod_eq_zero_iff, List.mem_map, not_exists, not_and]
intro j hj
exact hs j (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hj)
theorem chineseRemainderOfList_modEq_unique (l : List ι)
(co : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s)) {z} (hz : ∀ i ∈ l, z ≡ a i [MOD s i]) :
z ≡ chineseRemainderOfList a s l co [MOD (l.map s).prod] := by
induction' l with i l ih
· simp [modEq_one]
· simp only [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, chineseRemainderOfList]
have : Coprime (s i) (l.map s).prod := by
simp only [coprime_list_prod_right_iff, List.mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro j hj
exact (List.pairwise_cons.mp co).1 j hj
exact chineseRemainder_modEq_unique this
(hz i List.mem_cons_self) (ih co.of_cons (fun j hj => hz j (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hj)))
theorem chineseRemainderOfList_perm {l l' : List ι} (hl : l.Perm l')
(hs : ∀ i ∈ l, s i ≠ 0) (co : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s)) :
(chineseRemainderOfList a s l co : ℕ) =
chineseRemainderOfList a s l' (co.perm hl coprime_comm.mpr) := by
let z := chineseRemainderOfList a s l' (co.perm hl coprime_comm.mpr)
have hlp : (l.map s).prod = (l'.map s).prod := List.Perm.prod_eq (List.Perm.map s hl)
exact (chineseRemainderOfList_modEq_unique a s l co (z := z)
(fun i hi => z.prop i (hl.symm.mem_iff.mpr hi))).symm.eq_of_lt_of_lt
(chineseRemainderOfList_lt_prod _ _ _ _ hs)
(by rw [hlp]
exact chineseRemainderOfList_lt_prod _ _ _ _
(by simpa [List.Perm.mem_iff hl.symm] using hs))
/-- The natural number less than `(m.map s).prod` congruent to
`a i` mod `s i` for all `i ∈ m`. -/
def chineseRemainderOfMultiset {m : Multiset ι} :
m.Nodup → (∀ i ∈ m, s i ≠ 0) → Set.Pairwise {x | x ∈ m} (Coprime on s) →
{ k // ∀ i ∈ m, k ≡ a i [MOD s i] } :=
Quotient.recOn m
(fun l nod _ co =>
chineseRemainderOfList a s l (List.Nodup.pairwise_of_forall_ne nod co))
(fun l l' (pp : l.Perm l') ↦
funext fun nod' : l'.Nodup =>
have nod : l.Nodup := pp.symm.nodup_iff.mp nod'
funext fun hs' : ∀ i ∈ l', s i ≠ 0 =>
have hs : ∀ i ∈ l, s i ≠ 0 := by simpa [List.Perm.mem_iff pp] using hs'
funext fun co' : Set.Pairwise {x | x ∈ l'} (Coprime on s) =>
have co : Set.Pairwise {x | x ∈ l} (Coprime on s) := by simpa [List.Perm.mem_iff pp] using co'
have lco : l.Pairwise (Coprime on s) := List.Nodup.pairwise_of_forall_ne nod co
have : ∀ {m' e nod'' hs'' co''}, @Eq.ndrec (Multiset ι) l
(fun m ↦ m.Nodup → (∀ i ∈ m, s i ≠ 0) →
Set.Pairwise {x | x ∈ m} (Coprime on s) → { k // ∀ i ∈ m, k ≡ a i [MOD s i] })
(fun nod _ co ↦ chineseRemainderOfList a s l (List.Nodup.pairwise_of_forall_ne nod co))
m' e nod'' hs'' co'' =
(chineseRemainderOfList a s l lco : ℕ) := by
rintro _ rfl _ _ _; rfl
by ext; exact this.trans <| chineseRemainderOfList_perm a s pp hs lco)
theorem chineseRemainderOfMultiset_lt_prod {m : Multiset ι}
(nod : m.Nodup) (hs : ∀ i ∈ m, s i ≠ 0) (pp : Set.Pairwise {x | x ∈ m} (Coprime on s)) :
chineseRemainderOfMultiset a s nod hs pp < (m.map s).prod := by
induction' m using Quot.ind with l
unfold chineseRemainderOfMultiset
simpa using chineseRemainderOfList_lt_prod a s l
(List.Nodup.pairwise_of_forall_ne nod pp) (by simpa using hs)
/-- The natural number less than `∏ i ∈ t, s i` congruent to
`a i` mod `s i` for all `i ∈ t`. -/
def chineseRemainderOfFinset (t : Finset ι)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, s i ≠ 0) (pp : Set.Pairwise t (Coprime on s)) :
{ k // ∀ i ∈ t, k ≡ a i [MOD s i] } := by
simpa using chineseRemainderOfMultiset a s t.nodup (by simpa using hs) (by simpa using pp)
|
theorem chineseRemainderOfFinset_lt_prod {t : Finset ι}
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, s i ≠ 0) (pp : Set.Pairwise t (Coprime on s)) :
chineseRemainderOfFinset a s t hs pp < ∏ i ∈ t, s i := by
simpa [chineseRemainderOfFinset] using
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/ChineseRemainder.lean | 160 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.PreservesHomology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Injective.Basic
/-!
# Exact short complexes
When `S : ShortComplex C`, this file defines a structure
`S.Exact` which expresses the exactness of `S`, i.e. there
exists a homology data `h : S.HomologyData` such that
`h.left.H` is zero. When `[S.HasHomology]`, it is equivalent
to the assertion `IsZero S.homology`.
Almost by construction, this notion of exactness is self dual,
see `Exact.op` and `Exact.unop`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits ZeroObject Preadditive
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace ShortComplex
section
variable
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The assertion that the short complex `S : ShortComplex C` is exact. -/
structure Exact : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists an homology data whose `left.H` field is zero -/
condition : ∃ (h : S.HomologyData), IsZero h.left.H
variable {S}
lemma Exact.hasHomology (h : S.Exact) : S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' h.condition.choose
lemma Exact.hasZeroObject (h : S.Exact) : HasZeroObject C :=
⟨h.condition.choose.left.H, h.condition.choose_spec⟩
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_homology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.homology := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨h', z⟩⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso z h'.left.homologyIso
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_leftHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.leftHomology :=
LeftHomologyData.exact_iff _
lemma exact_iff_isZero_rightHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.rightHomology :=
RightHomologyData.exact_iff _
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.left.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact LeftHomologyData.exact_iff h.left
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff' (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.right.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact RightHomologyData.exact_iff h.right
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_homology_iso_zero [S.HasHomology] [HasZeroObject C] :
S.Exact ↔ Nonempty (S.homology ≅ 0) := by
rw [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isoZero⟩
· rintro ⟨e⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso (isZero_zero C) e
lemma exact_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : S₁.Exact) : S₂.Exact := by
obtain ⟨⟨h, z⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨HomologyData.ofIso e h, z⟩⟩
lemma exact_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact :=
⟨exact_of_iso e, exact_of_iso e.symm⟩
lemma exact_and_mono_f_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Mono S₁.f ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Mono S₂.f := by
have : Mono S₁.f ↔ Mono S₂.f :=
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₁.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₁₂)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_and_epi_g_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Epi S₁.g ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Epi S₂.g := by
have : Epi S₁.g ↔ Epi S₂.g :=
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₃.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₂₃)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_of_isZero_X₂ (h : IsZero S.X₂) : S.Exact := by
rw [(HomologyData.ofZeros S (IsZero.eq_of_tgt h _ _) (IsZero.eq_of_src h _ _)).exact_iff]
exact h
lemma exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, z₁⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁, z₁⟩
· rintro ⟨h₂, z₂⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h₂, z₂⟩
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff_i_p_zero (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h.left.i ≫ h.right.p = 0 := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
rw [h.left.exact_iff, ← h.comm]
constructor
· intro z
rw [IsZero.eq_of_src z h.iso.hom 0, zero_comp, comp_zero]
· intro eq
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.iso.hom, id_comp, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι,
← cancel_epi h.left.π, eq, zero_comp, comp_zero]
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_i_p_zero [S.HasHomology] (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h₁.i ≫ h₂.p = 0 :=
(HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂).exact_iff_i_p_zero
lemma exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 :=
S.exact_iff_i_p_zero _ _
lemma exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero [S.HasHomology]
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
haveI := HasLeftHomology.hasCokernel S
haveI := HasRightHomology.hasKernel S
exact S.exact_iff_i_p_zero (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
(RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
variable {S}
lemma Exact.op (h : S.Exact) : S.op.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.op, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).op⟩⟩
lemma Exact.unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.Exact) : S.unop.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.unop, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).unop⟩⟩
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma exact_op_iff : S.op.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
⟨Exact.unop, Exact.op⟩
@[simp]
lemma exact_unop_iff (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) : S.unop.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
S.unop.exact_op_iff.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesRightHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have : S.HasHomology := h.hasHomology
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
exact h.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf F
variable (S)
lemma exact_map_iff_of_faithful [S.HasHomology]
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] [F.Faithful] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ S.Exact := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero]
rw [(S.leftHomologyData.map F).exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
LeftHomologyData.map_H] at h
apply F.map_injective
rw [F.map_id, F.map_zero, h]
· intro h
exact h.map F
variable {S}
@[reassoc]
lemma Exact.comp_eq_zero (h : S.Exact) {X Y : C} {a : X ⟶ S.X₂} (ha : a ≫ S.g = 0)
{b : S.X₂ ⟶ Y} (hb : S.f ≫ b = 0) : a ≫ b = 0 := by
have := h.hasHomology
have eq := h
rw [exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero] at eq
rw [← S.liftCycles_i a ha, ← S.p_descOpcycles b hb, assoc, reassoc_of% eq,
zero_comp, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.isZero_of_both_zeros (ex : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
IsZero S.X₂ :=
(ShortComplex.HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg).exact_iff.1 ex
end
section Preadditive
variable [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D] (S : ShortComplex C)
lemma exact_iff_mono [HasZeroObject C] (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono S.g := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
have := mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ S.homologyIsKernel h
rw [← S.p_fromOpcycles]
apply mono_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero (KernelFork.ofι (0 : 0 ⟶ S.X₂) zero_comp)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
lemma exact_iff_epi [HasZeroObject C] (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi S.f := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
haveI := S.isIso_iCycles hg
haveI : Epi S.toCycles := epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ S.homologyIsCokernel h
rw [← S.toCycles_i]
apply epi_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero (CokernelCofork.ofπ (0 : S.X₂ ⟶ 0) comp_zero)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
variable {S}
lemma Exact.epi_f' (hS : S.Exact) (h : LeftHomologyData S) : Epi h.f' :=
epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ h.hπ (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.mono_g' (hS : S.Exact) (h : RightHomologyData S) : Mono h.g' :=
mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ h.hι (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.epi_toCycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasLeftHomology] : Epi S.toCycles :=
hS.epi_f' _
lemma Exact.mono_fromOpcycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasRightHomology] : Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
hS.mono_g' _
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f' [S.HasHomology] (h : LeftHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi h.f' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.epi_f' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_epi h.π, ← cancel_epi h.f',
comp_id, h.f'_π, comp_zero]
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g' [S.HasHomology] (h : RightHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono h.g' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.mono_g' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.ι, ← cancel_mono h.g',
id_comp, h.ι_g', zero_comp]
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a limit kernel fork `kf` for `S.g`, this is the
left homology data for `S` with `K := kf.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.leftHomologyDataOfIsLimitKernelFork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (kf : KernelFork S.g) (hkf : IsLimit kf) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kf.pt
H := 0
i := kf.ι
π := 0
wi := kf.condition
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hkf (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wπ := comp_zero
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).1
hS.epi_toCycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso S.cyclesIsKernel hkf) ?_
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hkf
simp [IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a colimit cokernel cofork `cc` for `S.f`, this is the
right homology data for `S` with `Q := cc.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.rightHomologyDataOfIsColimitCokernelCofork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (cc : CokernelCofork S.f) (hcc : IsColimit cc) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := cc.pt
H := 0
p := cc.π
ι := 0
wp := cc.condition
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hcc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := zero_comp
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).2
hS.mono_fromOpcycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hcc S.opcyclesIsCokernel)
(Iso.refl _) ?_
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hcc
simp [IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_epi_toCycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Epi S.toCycles :=
S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f'
lemma exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g'
lemma exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift [S.HasHomology] [HasKernel S.g] :
S.Exact ↔ Epi (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _) S.cyclesIsoKernel (by aesop_cat)
lemma exact_iff_mono_cokernel_desc [S.HasHomology] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ Mono (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
refine (MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff (Iso.symm ?_)
exact Arrow.isoMk S.opcyclesIsoCokernel.symm (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
lemma QuasiIso.exact_iff {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] [QuasiIso φ] : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff (asIso (homologyMap φ))
lemma exact_of_f_is_kernel (hS : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.f S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
have : IsSplitEpi S.toCycles :=
⟨⟨{ section_ := hS.lift (KernelFork.ofι S.iCycles S.iCycles_g)
id := by
rw [← cancel_mono S.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i, id_comp]
exact Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
lemma exact_of_g_is_cokernel (hS : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.g S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
have : IsSplitMono S.fromOpcycles :=
⟨⟨{ retraction := hS.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.pOpcycles S.f_pOpcycles)
id := by
rw [← cancel_epi S.pOpcycles, p_fromOpcycles_assoc, comp_id]
exact Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
variable {S}
lemma Exact.mono_g (hS : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) : Mono S.g := by
have := hS.hasHomology
have := hS.epi_toCycles
have : S.iCycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_epi S.toCycles, comp_zero, toCycles_i, hf]
apply Preadditive.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.liftCycles_i x₂ hx₂, this, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.epi_f (hS : S.Exact) (hg : S.g = 0) : Epi S.f := by
have := hS.hasHomology
have := hS.mono_fromOpcycles
have : S.pOpcycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_mono S.fromOpcycles, zero_comp, p_fromOpcycles, hg]
apply Preadditive.epi_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.p_descOpcycles x₂ hx₂, this, zero_comp]
lemma Exact.mono_g_iff (hS : S.Exact) : Mono S.g ↔ S.f = 0 := by
constructor
· intro
rw [← cancel_mono S.g, zero, zero_comp]
· exact hS.mono_g
lemma Exact.epi_f_iff (hS : S.Exact) : Epi S.f ↔ S.g = 0 := by
constructor
· intro
rw [← cancel_epi S.f, zero, comp_zero]
· exact hS.epi_f
lemma Exact.isZero_X₂ (hS : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : IsZero S.X₂ := by
have := hS.mono_g hf
rw [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono S.g, hg, comp_zero, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.isZero_X₂_iff (hS : S.Exact) : IsZero S.X₂ ↔ S.f = 0 ∧ S.g = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.eq_of_tgt _ _, h.eq_of_src _ _⟩
· rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
exact hS.isZero_X₂ hf hg
variable (S)
/-- A splitting for a short complex `S` consists of the data of a retraction `r : X₂ ⟶ X₁`
of `S.f` and section `s : X₃ ⟶ X₂` of `S.g` which satisfy `r ≫ S.f + S.g ≫ s = 𝟙 _` -/
structure Splitting (S : ShortComplex C) where
/-- a retraction of `S.f` -/
r : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₁
/-- a section of `S.g` -/
s : S.X₃ ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the condition that `r` is a retraction of `S.f` -/
f_r : S.f ≫ r = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
/-- the condition that `s` is a section of `S.g` -/
s_g : s ≫ S.g = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
/-- the compatibility between the given section and retraction -/
id : r ≫ S.f + S.g ≫ s = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
namespace Splitting
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] f_r s_g
variable {S}
@[reassoc]
lemma r_f (s : S.Splitting) : s.r ≫ S.f = 𝟙 _ - S.g ≫ s.s := by rw [← s.id, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[reassoc]
lemma g_s (s : S.Splitting) : S.g ≫ s.s = 𝟙 _ - s.r ≫ S.f := by rw [← s.id, add_sub_cancel_left]
/-- Given a splitting of a short complex `S`, this shows that `S.f` is a split monomorphism. -/
@[simps] def splitMono_f (s : S.Splitting) : SplitMono S.f := ⟨s.r, s.f_r⟩
lemma isSplitMono_f (s : S.Splitting) : IsSplitMono S.f := ⟨⟨s.splitMono_f⟩⟩
lemma mono_f (s : S.Splitting) : Mono S.f := by
have := s.isSplitMono_f
infer_instance
/-- Given a splitting of a short complex `S`, this shows that `S.g` is a split epimorphism. -/
@[simps] def splitEpi_g (s : S.Splitting) : SplitEpi S.g := ⟨s.s, s.s_g⟩
lemma isSplitEpi_g (s : S.Splitting) : IsSplitEpi S.g := ⟨⟨s.splitEpi_g⟩⟩
lemma epi_g (s : S.Splitting) : Epi S.g := by
have := s.isSplitEpi_g
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma s_r (s : S.Splitting) : s.s ≫ s.r = 0 := by
have := s.epi_g
simp only [← cancel_epi S.g, comp_zero, g_s_assoc, sub_comp, id_comp,
assoc, f_r, comp_id, sub_self]
lemma ext_r (s s' : S.Splitting) (h : s.r = s'.r) : s = s' := by
have := s.epi_g
have eq := s.id
rw [← s'.id, h, add_right_inj, cancel_epi S.g] at eq
cases s
cases s'
obtain rfl := eq
obtain rfl := h
rfl
| lemma ext_s (s s' : S.Splitting) (h : s.s = s'.s) : s = s' := by
have := s.mono_f
have eq := s.id
rw [← s'.id, h, add_left_inj, cancel_mono S.f] at eq
cases s
cases s'
obtain rfl := eq
obtain rfl := h
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Exact.lean | 528 | 536 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Free groups
This file defines free groups over a type. Furthermore, it is shown that the free group construction
is an instance of a monad. For the result that `FreeGroup` is the left adjoint to the forgetful
functor from groups to types, see `Mathlib/Algebra/Category/Grp/Adjunctions.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `FreeGroup`/`FreeAddGroup`: the free group (resp. free additive group) associated to a type
`α` defined as the words over `a : α × Bool` modulo the relation `a * x * x⁻¹ * b = a * b`.
* `FreeGroup.mk`/`FreeAddGroup.mk`: the canonical quotient map `List (α × Bool) → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.of`/`FreeAddGroup.of`: the canonical injection `α → FreeGroup α`.
* `FreeGroup.lift f`/`FreeAddGroup.lift`: the canonical group homomorphism `FreeGroup α →* G`
given a group `G` and a function `f : α → G`.
## Main statements
* `FreeGroup.Red.church_rosser`/`FreeAddGroup.Red.church_rosser`: The Church-Rosser theorem for word
reduction (also known as Newman's diamond lemma).
* `FreeGroup.freeGroupUnitEquivInt`: The free group over the one-point type
is isomorphic to the integers.
* The free group construction is an instance of a monad.
## Implementation details
First we introduce the one step reduction relation `FreeGroup.Red.Step`:
`w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v`, its reflexive transitive closure `FreeGroup.Red.trans`
and prove that its join is an equivalence relation. Then we introduce `FreeGroup α` as a quotient
over `FreeGroup.Red.Step`.
For the additive version we introduce the same relation under a different name so that we can
distinguish the quotient types more easily.
## Tags
free group, Newman's diamond lemma, Church-Rosser theorem
-/
open Relation
open scoped List
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u}
attribute [local simp] List.append_eq_has_append
-- Porting note: to_additive.map_namespace is not supported yet
-- worked around it by putting a few extra manual mappings (but not too many all in all)
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `FreeGroup `FreeAddGroup
/-- Reduction step for the additive free group relation: `w + x + (-x) + v ~> w + v` -/
inductive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeAddGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeAddGroup.Red.Step.not
/-- Reduction step for the multiplicative free group relation: `w * x * x⁻¹ * v ~> w * v` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red.Step]
inductive FreeGroup.Red.Step : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop
| not {L₁ L₂ x b} : FreeGroup.Red.Step (L₁ ++ (x, b) :: (x, not b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂)
attribute [simp] FreeGroup.Red.Step.not
namespace FreeGroup
variable {L L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)}
/-- Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step` -/
@[to_additive FreeAddGroup.Red "Reflexive-transitive closure of `Red.Step`"]
def Red : List (α × Bool) → List (α × Bool) → Prop :=
ReflTransGen Red.Step
@[to_additive (attr := refl)]
theorem Red.refl : Red L L :=
ReflTransGen.refl
@[to_additive (attr := trans)]
theorem Red.trans : Red L₁ L₂ → Red L₂ L₃ → Red L₁ L₃ :=
ReflTransGen.trans
namespace Red
/-- Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there are words
`w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃xx⁻¹w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄` -/
@[to_additive "Predicate asserting that the word `w₁` can be reduced to `w₂` in one step, i.e. there
are words `w₃ w₄` and letter `x` such that `w₁ = w₃ + x + (-x) + w₄` and `w₂ = w₃w₄`"]
theorem Step.length : ∀ {L₁ L₂ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → L₂.length + 2 = L₁.length
| _, _, @Red.Step.not _ L1 L2 x b => by rw [List.length_append, List.length_append]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.not_rev {x b} : Step (L₁ ++ (x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L₂) (L₁ ++ L₂) := by
cases b <;> exact Step.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not {x b} : Red.Step ((x, b) :: (x, !b) :: L) L :=
@Step.not _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Step.cons_not_rev {x b} : Red.Step ((x, !b) :: (x, b) :: L) L :=
@Red.Step.not_rev _ [] _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₂ L₃ → Step (L₁ ++ L₂) (L₁ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by rw [← List.append_assoc, ← List.append_assoc]; constructor
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons {x} (H : Red.Step L₁ L₂) : Red.Step (x :: L₁) (x :: L₂) :=
@Step.append_left _ [x] _ _ H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_right : ∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ : List (α × Bool)}, Step L₁ L₂ → Step (L₁ ++ L₃) (L₂ ++ L₃)
| _, _, _, Red.Step.not => by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_nil : ¬Step [] L := by
generalize h' : [] = L'
intro h
rcases h with - | ⟨L₁, L₂⟩
simp [List.nil_eq_append_iff] at h'
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_left_iff {a : α} {b : Bool} :
Step ((a, b) :: L₁) L₂ ↔ (∃ L, Step L₁ L ∧ L₂ = (a, b) :: L) ∨ L₁ = (a, ! b) :: L₂ := by
constructor
· generalize hL : ((a, b) :: L₁ : List _) = L
rintro @⟨_ | ⟨p, s'⟩, e, a', b'⟩ <;> simp_all
· rintro (⟨L, h, rfl⟩ | rfl)
· exact Step.cons h
· exact Step.cons_not
@[to_additive]
theorem not_step_singleton : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, ¬Step [p] L
| (a, b) => by simp [Step.cons_left_iff, not_step_nil]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.cons_cons_iff : ∀ {p : α × Bool}, Step (p :: L₁) (p :: L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂ := by
simp +contextual [Step.cons_left_iff, iff_def, or_imp]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.append_left_iff : ∀ L, Step (L ++ L₁) (L ++ L₂) ↔ Step L₁ L₂
| [] => by simp
| p :: l => by simp [Step.append_left_iff l, Step.cons_cons_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond_aux :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)} {x1 b1 x2 b2},
L₁ ++ (x1, b1) :: (x1, !b1) :: L₂ = L₃ ++ (x2, b2) :: (x2, !b2) :: L₄ →
L₁ ++ L₂ = L₃ ++ L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step (L₁ ++ L₂) L₅ ∧ Red.Step (L₃ ++ L₄) L₅
| [], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, [(x3, b3)], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [(x3, b3)], _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by injections; subst_vars; simp
| [], _, (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; exact ⟨_, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.cons_not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: (x4, b4) :: tl, _, [], _, _, _, _, _, H => by
injections; subst_vars; right; simpa using ⟨_, Red.Step.cons_not, Red.Step.not⟩
| (x3, b3) :: tl, _, (x4, b4) :: tl2, _, _, _, _, _, H =>
let ⟨H1, H2⟩ := List.cons.inj H
match Step.diamond_aux H2 with
| Or.inl H3 => Or.inl <| by simp [H1, H3]
| Or.inr ⟨L₅, H3, H4⟩ => Or.inr ⟨_, Step.cons H3, by simpa [H1] using Step.cons H4⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.diamond :
∀ {L₁ L₂ L₃ L₄ : List (α × Bool)},
Red.Step L₁ L₃ → Red.Step L₂ L₄ → L₁ = L₂ → L₃ = L₄ ∨ ∃ L₅, Red.Step L₃ L₅ ∧ Red.Step L₄ L₅
| _, _, _, _, Red.Step.not, Red.Step.not, H => Step.diamond_aux H
@[to_additive]
theorem Step.to_red : Step L₁ L₂ → Red L₁ L₂ :=
ReflTransGen.single
/-- **Church-Rosser theorem** for word reduction: If `w1 w2 w3` are words such that `w1` reduces
| to `w2` and `w3` respectively, then there is a word `w4` such that `w2` and `w3` reduce to `w4`
respectively. This is also known as Newman's diamond lemma. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeGroup/Basic.lean | 184 | 185 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
|
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 375 | 377 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Rat
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
This file provides results about the multiplicative structure on `A ⊗[R] B` when `R` is a
commutative (semi)ring and `A` and `B` are both `R`-algebras. On these tensor products,
multiplication is characterized by `(a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)`.
## Main declarations
- `LinearMap.baseChange A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.semiring`: the ring structure on `A ⊗[R] B` for two `R`-algebras `A`, `B`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra`: the `S`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`, for when `A` is
additionally an `S` algebra.
- the structure isomorphisms
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A` (usually used with `S = R` or `S = A`)
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for the tensor product of algebras.
## References
* [C. Kassel, *Quantum Groups* (§II.4)][Kassel1995]
-/
assert_not_exists Equiv.Perm.cycleType
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A) in
/-- `baseChange A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`.
This "base change" operation is also known as "extension of scalars". -/
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_smul : (r • f).baseChange A = r • f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_id : (.id : M →ₗ[R] M).baseChange A = .id := by
ext; simp
lemma baseChange_comp (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
(g ∘ₗ f).baseChange A = g.baseChange A ∘ₗ f.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R M) in
@[simp]
lemma baseChange_one : (1 : Module.End R M).baseChange A = 1 := baseChange_id
lemma baseChange_mul (f g : Module.End R M) :
(f * g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A * g.baseChange A := by
ext; simp
variable (R A M N)
/-- `baseChange A e` for `e : M ≃ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`. -/
def _root_.LinearEquiv.baseChange (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.congr (.refl _ _) e
/-- `baseChange` as a linear map.
When `M = N`, this is true more strongly as `Module.End.baseChangeHom`. -/
@[simps]
def baseChangeHom : (M →ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N where
toFun := baseChange A
map_add' := baseChange_add
map_smul' := baseChange_smul
/-- `baseChange` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.Module.End.baseChangeHom : Module.End R M →ₐ[R] Module.End A (A ⊗[R] M) :=
.ofLinearMap (LinearMap.baseChangeHom _ _ _ _) (baseChange_one _ _) baseChange_mul
lemma baseChange_pow (f : Module.End R M) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n).baseChange A = f.baseChange A ^ n :=
map_pow (Module.End.baseChangeHom _ _ _) f n
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R A B M N : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_sub : (f - g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A - g.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_sub]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_neg : (-f).baseChange A = -f.baseChange A := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, tmul_neg]
end Ring
section liftBaseChange
|
variable {R M N} (A) [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module A N] [IsScalarTower R A N]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 156 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# Measurability of the integral against a kernel
The Bochner integral of a strongly measurable function against a kernel is strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right`: the function
`a ↦ ∫ b, f a b ∂(κ a)` is measurable, for an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function
`f : α → β → E` such that `uncurry f` is measurable.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Function Set Filter
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{κ : Kernel α β} {η : Kernel β γ} {a : α} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_integrable ⦃f : β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | Integrable f (κ a)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt hf.enorm.lintegral_kernel measurable_const
variable [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : Kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_kernel_integrable ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) :
MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right hf.enorm) measurable_const
open ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
omit [IsSFiniteKernel κ] in
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel ⦃f : β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
have : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc β E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let f' n : α → E := {x | Integrable f (κ x)}.indicator fun x ↦ (s n).integral (κ x)
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (f := f') atTop (fun n ↦ ?_) ?_
· refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
exact κ.measurable_coe ((s n).measurableSet_fiber _)
· rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable f (κ x)
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hfx, indicator_of_mem, f']
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset _ hfx
exact subset_rfl
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prodMk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n =>
{x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral (κ x)
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_kernel_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply Kernel.measurable_kernel_prodMk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂κ x) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) (κ x)
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) (κ x) := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was
-- exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
-- SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le hf.measurable (by simp) (x, y) n
· refine Eventually.of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf.measurable (by simp) ?_
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂κ x := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf
exact hf.integral_kernel_prod_right
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right'' {f : β × γ → E}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun x => ∫ y, (fun u : (α × β) × γ => f (u.1.2, u.2)) (x, y) ∂η x) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.snd.prodMk measurable_snd))
simpa using this
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left ⦃f : β → α → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' ⦃f : β × α → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left'' {f : γ × β → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂η (a, y) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun y => ∫ x, (fun u : γ × α × β => f (u.1, u.2.2)) (x, y) ∂η y) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_snd.snd))
simpa using this
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/MeasurableIntegral.lean | 192 | 201 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Basic
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
- `MulAction.index_stabilizer`: the index of the stabilizer is the cardinality of the orbit
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal Function
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number. Returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of an additive subgroup as a natural number.
Returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
/-- If `H` and `K` are subgroups of a group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ` is the index
of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "If `H` and `K` are subgroups of an additive group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ`
is the index of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
| @[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {f : G' →* G} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.comap f).index = H.index := by
have key : ∀ x y : G',
QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f) x y ↔ QuotientGroup.leftRel H (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 62 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
/-!
# Pigeonhole principles
Given pigeons (possibly infinitely many) in pigeonholes, the
pigeonhole principle states that, if there are more pigeons than
pigeonholes, then there is a pigeonhole with two or more pigeons.
There are a few variations on this statement, and the conclusion can
be made stronger depending on how many pigeons you know you might
have.
The basic statements of the pigeonhole principle appear in the
following locations:
* `Data.Finset.Basic` has `Finset.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to`
* `Data.Fintype.Basic` has `Fintype.exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt`
* `Data.Fintype.Basic` has `Finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite`
* `Data.Fintype.Basic` has `Finite.exists_infinite_fiber`
* `Data.Set.Finite` has `Set.infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo`
This module gives access to these pigeonhole principles along with 20 more.
The versions vary by:
* using a function between `Fintype`s or a function between possibly infinite types restricted to
`Finset`s;
* counting pigeons by a general weight function (`∑ x ∈ s, w x`) or by heads (`#s`);
* using strict or non-strict inequalities;
* establishing upper or lower estimate on the number (or the total weight) of the pigeons in one
pigeonhole;
* in case when we count pigeons by some weight function `w` and consider a function `f` between
`Finset`s `s` and `t`, we can either assume that each pigeon is in one of the pigeonholes
(`∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t`), or assume that for `y ∉ t`, the total weight of the pigeons in this
pigeonhole `∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x` is nonpositive or nonnegative depending on
the inequality we are proving.
Lemma names follow `mathlib` convention (e.g.,
`Finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum`); "pigeonhole principle" is mentioned in the
docstrings instead of the names.
## See also
* `Ordinal.infinite_pigeonhole`: pigeonhole principle for cardinals, formulated using cofinality;
* `MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure`,
`MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure`: pigeonhole principle in a
measure space.
## Tags
pigeonhole principle
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {M : Type w} [DecidableEq β]
open Nat
namespace Finset
variable {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β} {w : α → M} {b : M} {n : ℕ}
/-!
### The pigeonhole principles on `Finset`s, pigeons counted by weight
In this section we prove the following version of the pigeonhole principle: if the total weight of a
finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, and they are sorted into `n` pigeonholes, then for
some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is greater than `b`, and a few
variations of this theorem.
The principle is formalized in the following way, see
`Finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum`: if `f : α → β` is a function which maps all
elements of `s : Finset α` to `t : Finset β` and `#t • b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x`, where `w : α → M` is
a weight function taking values in a `LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid`, then for
some `y ∈ t`, the sum of the weights of all `x ∈ s` such that `f x = y` is greater than `b`.
There are a few bits we can change in this theorem:
* reverse all inequalities, with obvious adjustments to the name;
* replace the assumption `∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t` with `∀ y ∉ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x ≤ 0`,
and replace `of_maps_to` with `of_sum_fiber_nonpos` in the name;
* use non-strict inequalities assuming `t` is nonempty.
We can do all these variations independently, so we have eight versions of the theorem.
-/
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid M]
/-!
#### Strict inequality versions
-/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, and they are sorted into
`n` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is
greater than `b`. -/
theorem exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : #t • b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt <| by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than `n • b`, and they are sorted into `n`
pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole is less
than `b`. -/
theorem exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_maps_to_of_sum_lt_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x < #t • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x < b :=
exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf hb
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than `n • b`, they are sorted into some
pigeonholes, and for all but `n` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons there is nonpositive,
then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole
is greater than `b`. -/
theorem exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x ≤ 0)
(hb : #t • b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt <|
calc
∑ _y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x := by simpa
_ ≤ ∑ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x := sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos ht
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, strict inequality version:
if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than `n • b`, they are sorted into some
pigeonholes, and for all but `n` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons there is nonnegative,
then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the pigeons in this pigeonhole
is less than `b`. -/
theorem exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, (0 : M) ≤ ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x) (hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x < #t • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x < b :=
exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) ht hb
/-!
#### Non-strict inequality versions
-/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than or equal to `n • b`, and
they are sorted into `n > 0` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons
in this pigeonhole is greater than or equal to `b`. -/
theorem exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : #t • b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht <| by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than or equal to `n • b`, and they
are sorted into `n > 0` pigeonholes, then for some pigeonhole, the total weight of the pigeons in
this pigeonhole is less than or equal to `b`. -/
theorem exists_sum_fiber_le_of_maps_to_of_sum_le_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x ≤ #t • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x ≤ b :=
exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf ht hb
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is greater than or equal to `n • b`, they
are sorted into some pigeonholes, and for all but `n > 0` pigeonholes the total weight of the
pigeons there is nonpositive, then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of
the pigeons in this pigeonhole is greater than or equal to `b`. -/
theorem exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x ≤ 0) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : #t • b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht <|
calc
∑ _y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x := by simpa
_ ≤ ∑ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x :=
sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos hf
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by weight, non-strict inequality
version: if the total weight of a finite set of pigeons is less than or equal to `n • b`, they are
sorted into some pigeonholes, and for all but `n > 0` pigeonholes the total weight of the pigeons
there is nonnegative, then for at least one of these `n` pigeonholes, the total weight of the
pigeons in this pigeonhole is less than or equal to `b`. -/
theorem exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, (0 : M) ≤ ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x ≤ #t • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s with f x = y, w x ≤ b :=
exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf ht hb
end
variable [CommSemiring M] [LinearOrder M] [IsStrictOrderedRing M]
/-!
### The pigeonhole principles on `Finset`s, pigeons counted by heads
In this section we formalize a few versions of the following pigeonhole principle: there is a
pigeonhole with at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all
pigeonholes.
First, we can use strict or non-strict inequalities. While the versions with non-strict inequalities
are weaker than those with strict inequalities, sometimes it might be more convenient to apply the
weaker version. Second, we can either state that there exists a pigeonhole with at least `n`
pigeons, or state that there exists a pigeonhole with at most `n` pigeons. In the latter case we do
not need the assumption `∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t`.
So, we prove four theorems: `Finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_maps_to_of_mul_lt_card`,
`Finset.exists_le_card_fiber_of_maps_to_of_mul_le_card`,
`Finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul`, and `Finset.exists_card_fiber_le_of_card_le_mul`. -/
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes. -/
theorem exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(ht : #t • b < #s) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < #{x ∈ s | f x = y} := by
simp_rw [cast_card] at ht ⊢
exact exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum hf ht
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at least as many pigeons as the ceiling of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes.
("The maximum is at least the mean" specialized to integers.)
More formally, given a function between finite sets `s` and `t` and a natural number `n` such that
`#t * n < #s`, there exists `y ∈ t` such that its preimage in `s` has more than `n`
elements. -/
theorem exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hn : #t * n < #s) : ∃ y ∈ t, n < #{x ∈ s | f x = y} :=
| exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to hf hn
/-- The pigeonhole principle for finitely many pigeons counted by heads: there is a pigeonhole with
at most as many pigeons as the floor of the average number of pigeons across all pigeonholes. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Pigeonhole.lean | 228 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
| have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 376 | 378 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Pell's equation and Matiyasevic's theorem
This file solves Pell's equation, i.e. integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`
*in the special case that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`*.
This is then applied to prove Matiyasevic's theorem that the power
function is Diophantine, which is the last key ingredient in the solution to Hilbert's tenth
problem. For the definition of Diophantine function, see `NumberTheory.Dioph`.
For results on Pell's equation for arbitrary (positive, non-square) `d`, see
`NumberTheory.Pell`.
## Main definition
* `pell` is a function assigning to a natural number `n` the `n`-th solution to Pell's equation
constructed recursively from the initial solution `(0, 1)`.
## Main statements
* `eq_pell` shows that every solution to Pell's equation is recursively obtained using `pell`
* `matiyasevic` shows that a certain system of Diophantine equations has a solution if and only if
the first variable is the `x`-component in a solution to Pell's equation - the key step towards
Hilbert's tenth problem in Davis' version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
* `eq_pow_of_pell` shows that the power function is Diophantine.
## Implementation notes
The proof of Matiyasevic's theorem doesn't follow Matiyasevic's original account of using Fibonacci
numbers but instead Davis' variant of using solutions to Pell's equation.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevič's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Pell's equation, Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
-/
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- The property of being a solution to the Pell equation, expressed
as a property of elements of `ℤ√d`. -/
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
theorem isPell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : IsPell b) (hc : IsPell c) : IsPell (b * c) :=
isPell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm c, mul_assoc,
star_mul, isPell_norm.1 hb, isPell_norm.1 hc])
theorem isPell_star : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ IsPell (star b)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [IsPell, Zsqrtd.star_mk]
end
section
variable {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a)
private def d (_a1 : 1 < a) :=
a * a - 1
@[simp]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d a1 :=
tsub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (by decide) (Nat.zero_le _) : 1 * 1 < a * a)
-- TODO(lint): Fix double namespace issue
/-- The Pell sequences, i.e. the sequence of integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`, where
`d = a ^ 2 - 1`, defined together in mutual recursion. -/
--@[nolint dup_namespace]
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
| 0 => (1, 0)
| n+1 => ((pell n).1 * a + d a1 * (pell n).2, (pell n).1 + (pell n).2 * a)
/-- The Pell `x` sequence. -/
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).1
/-- The Pell `y` sequence. -/
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).2
@[simp]
theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
show pell a1 n = ((pell a1 n).1, (pell a1 n).2) from
match pell a1 n with
| (_, _) => rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_zero : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_zero : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
theorem xn_one : xn a1 1 = a := by simp
theorem yn_one : yn a1 1 = 1 := by simp
/-- The Pell `x` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
xn a1 n
/-- The Pell `y` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
yn a1 n
section
/-- The element `a` such that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`, considered as an integer. -/
def az (a : ℕ) : ℤ :=
a
end
include a1 in
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1)
(by have := @Nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa [mul_one] at this)
theorem dz_val : ↑(d a1) = az a * az a - 1 :=
have : 1 ≤ a * a := asq_pos a1
by rw [Pell.d, Int.ofNat_sub this]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : (xz a1 (n + 1)) = xz a1 n * az a + d a1 * yz a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a :=
rfl
/-- The Pell sequence can also be viewed as an element of `ℤ√d` -/
def pellZd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√(d a1) :=
⟨xn a1 n, yn a1 n⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_re (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).re = xn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_im (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).im = yn a1 n :=
rfl
theorem isPell_nat {x y : ℕ} : IsPell (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 :=
⟨fun h =>
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1
(by rw [Int.ofNat_sub (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat <| Int.le.intro_sub _ h)]; exact h),
fun h =>
show ((x * x : ℕ) - (d a1 * y * y : ℕ) : ℤ) = 1 by
rw [← Int.ofNat_sub <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_succ (n : ℕ) : pellZd a1 (n + 1) = pellZd a1 n * ⟨a, 1⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem isPell_one : IsPell (⟨a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) :=
show az a * az a - d a1 * 1 * 1 = 1 by simp [dz_val]
theorem isPell_pellZd : ∀ n : ℕ, IsPell (pellZd a1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
let o := isPell_one a1
simpa using Pell.isPell_mul (isPell_pellZd n) o
@[simp]
theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
isPell_pellZd a1 n
@[simp]
theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz a1 n
have h : (↑(xn a1 n * xn a1 n) : ℤ) - ↑(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n) = 1 := by
repeat' rw [Int.natCast_mul]; exact pn
have hl : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n ≤ xn a1 n * xn a1 n :=
Nat.cast_le.1 <| Int.le.intro _ <| add_eq_of_eq_sub' <| Eq.symm h
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1 (by rw [Int.ofNat_sub hl]; exact h)
instance dnsq : Zsqrtd.Nonsquare (d a1) :=
⟨fun n h =>
have : n * n + 1 = a * a := by rw [← h]; exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1)
have na : n < a := Nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.1 (by rw [← this]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _)
have : (n + 1) * (n + 1) ≤ n * n + 1 := by rw [this]; exact Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na
have : n + n ≤ 0 :=
@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ (n * n + 1) _ (by ring_nf at this ⊢; assumption)
Nat.ne_of_gt (d_pos a1) <| by
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ((Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans this)] at h⟩
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n
| 0 => le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (xn_ge_a_pow n)) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem n_lt_xn (n) : n < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_pow_self a1) (xn_ge_a_pow a1 n)
theorem x_pos (n) : 0 < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le n) (n_lt_xn a1 n)
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
| 0, _ => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
| n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
(isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
(by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
⟨m + 1, by
rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
pellZd_succ, e]⟩
else
suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
fun h1l => by
obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := b
exact by
have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
rw [bm, mul_one] at t
exact h1l t
have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
rw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
exact ha t
simp only [sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add] at y0l; simp only [Zsqrtd.neg_re, add_neg_cancel,
Zsqrtd.neg_im, neg_neg] at yl2
exact
match y, y0l, (yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩) with
| 0, y0l, _ => y0l (le_refl 0)
| (y + 1 : ℕ), _, yl2 =>
yl2
(Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (by simp [sub_eq_add_neg])
(let t := Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le (Nat.succ_pos y)
add_le_add t t))
| Int.negSucc _, y0l, _ => y0l trivial
theorem eq_pellZd (b : ℤ√(d a1)) (b1 : 1 ≤ b) (hp : IsPell b) : ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := @Zsqrtd.le_arch (d a1) b
eq_pell_lem a1 n b b1 hp <|
h.trans <| by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
exact
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| le_of_lt <| n_lt_xn _ _)
(Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
/-- Every solution to **Pell's equation** is recursively obtained from the initial solution
`(1,0)` using the recursion `pell`. -/
theorem eq_pell {x y : ℕ} (hp : x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1) : ∃ n, x = xn a1 n ∧ y = yn a1 n :=
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨x, y⟩ :=
match x, hp with
| 0, (hp : 0 - _ = 1) => by rw [zero_tsub] at hp; contradiction
| x + 1, _hp =>
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| Nat.succ_pos x) (Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
let ⟨m, e⟩ := eq_pellZd a1 ⟨x, y⟩ this ((isPell_nat a1).2 hp)
⟨m,
match x, y, e with
| _, _, rfl => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
theorem pellZd_add (m) : ∀ n, pellZd a1 (m + n) = pellZd a1 m * pellZd a1 n
| 0 => (mul_one _).symm
| n + 1 => by rw [← add_assoc, pellZd_succ, pellZd_succ, pellZd_add _ n, ← mul_assoc]
theorem xn_add (m n) : xn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 m * yn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with h _
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
theorem yn_add (m n) : yn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * yn a1 n + yn a1 m * xn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with _ h
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
theorem pellZd_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : pellZd a1 (m - n) = pellZd a1 m * star (pellZd a1 n) := by
let t := pellZd_add a1 n (m - n)
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le h] at t
rw [t, mul_comm (pellZd _ n) _, mul_assoc, isPell_norm.1 (isPell_pellZd _ _), mul_one]
theorem xz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) :
xz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 m * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.re (pellZd_sub a1 h)
theorem yz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : yz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 n * yz a1 m - xz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg, mul_comm, add_comm]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.im (pellZd_sub a1 h)
theorem xy_coprime (n) : (xn a1 n).Coprime (yn a1 n) :=
Nat.coprime_of_dvd' fun k _ kx ky => by
let p := pell_eq a1 n
rw [← p]
exact Nat.dvd_sub (kx.mul_left _) (ky.mul_left _)
theorem strictMono_y : StrictMono (yn a1)
| _, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : yn a1 m ≤ yn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_y hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp only [yn_succ, gt_iff_lt]; refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left <| x_pos a1 n)
rw [← mul_one (yn a1 m)]
exact mul_le_mul this (le_of_lt a1) (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem strictMono_x : StrictMono (xn a1)
| _, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : xn a1 m ≤ xn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_x hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp only [xn_succ, gt_iff_lt]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_lt this ?_) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
have t := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a1 (x_pos a1 n)
rwa [mul_one] at t
theorem yn_ge_n : ∀ n, n ≤ yn a1 n
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| n + 1 =>
show n < yn a1 (n + 1) from lt_of_le_of_lt (yn_ge_n n) (strictMono_y a1 <| Nat.lt_succ_self n)
theorem y_mul_dvd (n) : ∀ k, yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * k)
| 0 => dvd_zero _
| k + 1 => by
rw [Nat.mul_succ, yn_add]; exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) ((y_mul_dvd _ k).mul_right _)
theorem y_dvd_iff (m n) : yn a1 m ∣ yn a1 n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun h =>
Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero <|
(Nat.eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_right fun hp => by
have co : Nat.Coprime (yn a1 m) (xn a1 (m * (n / m))) :=
Nat.Coprime.symm <| (xy_coprime a1 _).coprime_dvd_right (y_mul_dvd a1 m (n / m))
have m0 : 0 < m :=
m.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_left fun e => by
rw [e, Nat.mod_zero] at hp;rw [e] at h
exact _root_.ne_of_lt (strictMono_y a1 hp) (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h).symm
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n m, yn_add] at h
exact
not_le_of_gt (strictMono_y _ <| Nat.mod_lt n m0)
(Nat.le_of_dvd (strictMono_y _ hp) <|
co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <|
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_right <| (y_mul_dvd _ _ _).mul_left _).2 h),
fun ⟨k, e⟩ => by rw [e]; apply y_mul_dvd⟩
theorem xy_modEq_yn (n) :
∀ k, xn a1 (n * k) ≡ xn a1 n ^ k [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] ∧ yn a1 (n * k) ≡
k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3]
| 0 => by constructor <;> simpa using Nat.ModEq.refl _
| k + 1 => by
let ⟨hx, hy⟩ := xy_modEq_yn n k
have L : xn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * xn a1 n + 0 [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] :=
(hx.mul_right _).add <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact
mul_dvd_mul_right
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
(hy.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp)
_) _
have R : xn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n + yn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n + k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3] :=
ModEq.add
(by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact hx.mul_right' _) <| by
have : k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n * xn a1 n = k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n := by
rcases k with - | k <;> simp [_root_.pow_succ]; ring_nf
rw [← this]
exact hy.mul_right _
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, Nat.mul_succ, xn_add, yn_add, pow_succ (xn _ n), Nat.succ_mul,
add_comm (k * xn _ n ^ k) (xn _ n ^ k), right_distrib]
exact ⟨L, R⟩
theorem ysq_dvd_yy (n) : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * yn a1 n) :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
((xy_modEq_yn a1 n (yn a1 n)).right.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp [mul_dvd_mul_left, mul_assoc])
theorem dvd_of_ysq_dvd {n t} (h : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 t) : yn a1 n ∣ t :=
have nt : n ∣ t := (y_dvd_iff a1 n t).1 <| dvd_of_mul_left_dvd h
n.eq_zero_or_pos.elim (fun n0 => by rwa [n0] at nt ⊢) fun n0l : 0 < n => by
let ⟨k, ke⟩ := nt
have : yn a1 n ∣ k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) :=
Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (strictMono_y a1 n0l) <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <| by
have xm := (xy_modEq_yn a1 n k).right; rw [← ke] at xm
exact (xm.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).symm.trans h.modEq_zero_nat
rw [ke]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (((xy_coprime _ _).pow_left _).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right this) _
theorem pellZd_succ_succ (n) :
pellZd a1 (n + 2) + pellZd a1 n = (2 * a : ℕ) * pellZd a1 (n + 1) := by
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) + ⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ = ⟨a, 1⟩ * (2 * a) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
change (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = ⟨_, _⟩
rw [dz_val]
dsimp [az]
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring_nf
simpa [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_comm] using congr_arg (· * pellZd a1 n) this
theorem xy_succ_succ (n) :
xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n =
2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) ∧ yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) := by
have := pellZd_succ_succ a1 n; unfold pellZd at this
rw [Zsqrtd.nsmul_val (2 * a : ℕ)] at this
injection this with h₁ h₂
constructor <;> apply Int.ofNat.inj <;> [simpa using h₁; simpa using h₂]
theorem xn_succ_succ (n) : xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n = 2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).1
theorem yn_succ_succ (n) : yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).2
theorem xz_succ_succ (n) : xz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * xz a1 (n + 1) - xz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta xz; rw [← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_mul, xn_succ_succ]
theorem yz_succ_succ (n) : yz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * yz a1 (n + 1) - yz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta yz; rw [← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_mul, yn_succ_succ]
theorem yn_modEq_a_sub_one : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD a - 1]
| 0 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| 1 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_a_sub_one n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact ((modEq_sub a1.le).mul_left 2).mul (yn_modEq_a_sub_one (n + 1))
theorem yn_modEq_two : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD 2]
| 0 => by rfl
| 1 => by simp; rfl
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_two n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, mul_assoc, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact (dvd_mul_right 2 _).modEq_zero_nat.trans (dvd_mul_right 2 _).zero_modEq_nat
section
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem (y2 y1 y0 yn1 yn0 xn1 xn0 ay a2 : ℤ) :
(a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) =
y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) := by
ring
end
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow (y : ℕ) :
∀ n, (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ yz a1 n * (a - y) + ↑(y ^ n) - xz a1 n
| 0 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| 1 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| n + 2 => by
have : (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) - ↑(2 * a) * ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) + ↑(y ^ n) :=
⟨-↑(y ^ n), by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, mul_add, Int.natCast_mul, show ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 2 from rfl, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm]
ring⟩
rw [xz_succ_succ, yz_succ_succ, x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) ↑(y ^ n)]
exact _root_.dvd_sub (dvd_add this <| (x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ (n + 1)).mul_left _)
(x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ n)
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem (n j) : xn a1 n ∣ d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j := by
have h1 : d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j =
(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1) * xn a1 j := by
simp [add_mul, mul_assoc]
have h2 : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1 = xn a1 n * xn a1 n := by
zify at *
apply add_eq_of_eq_sub' (Eq.symm (pell_eqz a1 n))
rw [h2] at h1; rw [h1, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add (n j) : xn a1 (2 * n + j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
rw [two_mul, add_assoc, xn_add, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
refine (dvd_mul_right (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (n + j))).modEq_zero_nat.add ?_
rw [yn_add, left_distrib, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
exact
((dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_left _).modEq_zero_nat.add (xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem _ _ _).modEq_zero_nat
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem {n j} (h : j ≤ n) : xn a1 (2 * n - j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
have h1 : xz a1 n ∣ d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 (n - j) + xz a1 j := by
rw [yz_sub _ h, mul_sub_left_distrib, sub_add_eq_add_sub]
exact
dvd_sub
(by
delta xz; delta yz
rw [mul_comm (xn _ _ : ℤ)]
exact mod_cast (xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem _ n j))
((dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_left _)
rw [two_mul, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h, xn_add, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
exact
(dvd_mul_right _ _).modEq_zero_nat.add
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| by simpa [xz, yz] using h1).modEq_zero_nat
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn a1 (2 * n - j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] :=
(le_total j n).elim (xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1) fun jn => by
have : 2 * n - j + j ≤ n + j := by
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, two_mul]; exact Nat.add_le_add_left jn _
let t := xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1 (Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right this)
rwa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h, add_comm] at t
theorem xn_modEq_x4n_add (n j) : xn a1 (4 * n + j) ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n] :=
ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n + j)) <| by
refine @ModEq.trans _ _ 0 _ ?_ (by rw [add_comm]; exact (xn_modEq_x2n_add _ _ _).symm)
rw [show 4 * n = 2 * n + 2 * n from right_distrib 2 2 n, add_assoc]
apply xn_modEq_x2n_add
theorem xn_modEq_x4n_sub {n j} (h : j ≤ 2 * n) : xn a1 (4 * n - j) ≡ xn a1 j [MOD xn a1 n] :=
have h' : j ≤ 2 * n := le_trans h (by rw [Nat.succ_mul])
ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n - j)) <| by
refine @ModEq.trans _ _ 0 _ ?_ (by rw [add_comm]; exact (xn_modEq_x2n_sub _ h).symm)
rw [show 4 * n = 2 * n + 2 * n from right_distrib 2 2 n, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h']
apply xn_modEq_x2n_add
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 {i n} : ∀ {j}, i < j → j < n → xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n
| 0, ij, _ => absurd ij (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| j + 1, ij, jn => by
suffices xn a1 j % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n from
(lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(fun h => lt_trans (eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 h (le_of_lt jn)) this) fun h => by
rw [h]; exact this
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt jn)),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ jn)]
exact strictMono_x _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem2 {n} (h : 2 * xn a1 n = xn a1 (n + 1)) : a = 2 ∧ n = 0 := by
rw [xn_succ, mul_comm] at h
have : n = 0 :=
n.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_right fun np =>
_root_.ne_of_lt
(lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1)
(Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right <| mul_pos (d_pos a1) (strictMono_y a1 np)))
h
cases this; simp at h; exact ⟨h.symm, rfl⟩
theorem eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 {i n} (npos : 0 < n) :
∀ {j}, i < j → j ≤ 2 * n → j ≠ n → ¬(a = 2 ∧ n = 1 ∧ i = 0 ∧ j = 2) →
xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 j % xn a1 n
| 0, ij, _, _, _ => absurd ij (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| j + 1, ij, j2n, jnn, ntriv =>
have lem2 : ∀ k > n, k ≤ 2 * n → (↑(xn a1 k % xn a1 n) : ℤ) =
xn a1 n - xn a1 (2 * n - k) := fun k kn k2n => by
let k2nl :=
lt_of_add_lt_add_right <|
show 2 * n - k + k < n + k by
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
· rw [two_mul]
exact add_lt_add_left kn n
exact k2n
have xle : xn a1 (2 * n - k) ≤ xn a1 n := le_of_lt <| strictMono_x a1 k2nl
suffices xn a1 k % xn a1 n = xn a1 n - xn a1 (2 * n - k) by rw [this, Int.ofNat_sub xle]
rw [← Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt (x_pos a1 n) (x_pos a1 (2 * n - k)))]
apply ModEq.add_right_cancel' (xn a1 (2 * n - k))
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le xle]
have t := xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem a1 k2nl.le
rw [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le k2n] at t
exact t.trans dvd_rfl.zero_modEq_nat
(lt_trichotomy j n).elim (fun jn : j < n => eq_of_xn_modEq_lem1 _ ij (lt_of_le_of_ne jn jnn))
fun o =>
o.elim
(fun jn : j = n => by
cases jn
apply Int.lt_of_ofNat_lt_ofNat
rw [lem2 (n + 1) (Nat.lt_succ_self _) j2n,
show 2 * n - (n + 1) = n - 1 by
rw [two_mul, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_tsub_cancel_right]]
refine lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt ?_)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij with lin | ein
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (strictMono_x _ lin)]
have ll : xn a1 (n - 1) + xn a1 (n - 1) ≤ xn a1 n := by
rw [← two_mul, mul_comm,
show xn a1 n = xn a1 (n - 1 + 1) by rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt npos)],
xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
have npm : (n - 1).succ = n := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos npos
have il : i ≤ n - 1 := by
apply Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
rw [npm]
exact lin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le il with ill | ile
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_left (strictMono_x a1 ill) _) ll
· rw [ile]
apply lt_of_le_of_ne ll
rw [← two_mul]
exact fun e =>
ntriv <| by
let ⟨a2, s1⟩ :=
@eq_of_xn_modEq_lem2 _ a1 (n - 1)
(by rwa [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt npos)])
have n1 : n = 1 := le_antisymm (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp s1) npos
rw [ile, a2, n1]; exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
· rw [ein, Nat.mod_self, add_zero]
exact strictMono_x _ (Nat.pred_lt npos.ne'))
fun jn : j > n =>
have lem1 : j ≠ n → xn a1 j % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n →
xn a1 i % xn a1 n < xn a1 (j + 1) % xn a1 n :=
fun jn s =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ij)).elim
(fun h =>
lt_trans
(eq_of_xn_modEq_lem3 npos h (le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_le j2n)) jn
| fun ⟨_, n1, _, j2⟩ => by
rw [n1, j2] at j2n; exact absurd j2n (by decide))
s)
fun h => by rw [h]; exact s
lem1 (_root_.ne_of_gt jn) <|
Int.lt_of_ofNat_lt_ofNat <| by
rw [lem2 j jn (le_of_lt j2n), lem2 (j + 1) (Nat.le_succ_of_le jn) j2n]
refine sub_lt_sub_left (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt <| strictMono_x _ ?_) _
rw [Nat.sub_succ]
exact Nat.pred_lt (_root_.ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_of_lt j2n)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 643 | 652 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Nat.odd_iff, ← Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd] at hn
rw [← mul_two, ← @Nat.cast_two (ZMod n), ← ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime 2 hn, Units.mul_left_eq_zero]
theorem ne_neg_self {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a := by
rwa [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero hn]
theorem neg_one_ne_one {n : ℕ} [Fact (2 < n)] : (-1 : ZMod n) ≠ 1 :=
CharP.neg_one_ne_one (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_mod_two (a : ZMod 2) : -a = a := by
fin_cases a <;> apply Fin.ext <;> simp [Fin.coe_neg, Int.natMod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem natAbs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.natAbs : ZMod 2) = a := by
cases a
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, Int.ofNat_eq_coe]
· simp only [neg_eq_self_mod_two, Nat.cast_succ, Int.natAbs, Int.cast_negSucc]
theorem val_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(val_eq_zero a).not
theorem val_pos {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} : 0 < a.val ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem val_eq_one : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : 1 < n) (a : ZMod n), a.val = 1 ↔ a = 1
| 0, hn, _
| 1, hn, _ => by simp at hn
| n + 2, _, _ => by simp only [val, ZMod, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_one]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ 2 * a.val = n := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← two_mul]
cases n
· rw [@mul_eq_zero ℤ, @mul_eq_zero ℕ, val_eq_zero]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (by simp) Or.inl, fun h =>
Or.inr (h.elim id fun h => h.elim (by simp) id)⟩
conv_lhs =>
rw [← a.natCast_zmod_val, ← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_mul, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨m, he⟩
rcases m with - | m
· rw [mul_zero, mul_eq_zero] at he
rcases he with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | he)
exact Or.inl (a.val_eq_zero.1 he)
cases m
· right
rwa [show 0 + 1 = 1 from rfl, mul_one] at he
refine (a.val_lt.not_le <| Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ zero_lt_two).elim
rw [he, mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
simp
· rintro (rfl | h)
· rw [val_zero, mul_zero]
apply dvd_zero
· rw [h]
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_cast_zmod_lt {m : ℕ} [NeZero m] (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ZMod m) :
(a.cast : ZMod n).val < m := by
rcases m with (⟨⟩|⟨m⟩); · cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
by_cases h : m < n
· rcases n with (⟨⟩|⟨n⟩); · simp at h
rw [← natCast_val, val_cast_of_lt]
· apply a.val_lt
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (ZMod.val_lt a)) h
· rw [not_lt] at h
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (ZMod.val_lt _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_succ m))
theorem neg_val' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = (n - a.val) % n :=
calc
(-a).val = val (-a) % n := by rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (-a).val_lt]
_ = (n - val a) % n :=
Nat.ModEq.add_right_cancel' (val a)
(by
rw [Nat.ModEq, ← val_add, neg_add_cancel, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a.val_le, Nat.mod_self,
val_zero])
theorem neg_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = if a = 0 then 0 else n - a.val := by
rw [neg_val']
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [if_pos h, h, val_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.mod_self]
rw [if_neg h]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
apply Nat.sub_lt (NeZero.pos n)
contrapose! h
rwa [Nat.le_zero, val_eq_zero] at h
theorem val_neg_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [nz : NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) [na : NeZero a] :
(- a).val = n - a.val := by simp_all [neg_val a, na.out]
theorem val_sub {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : b.val ≤ a.val) :
(a - b).val = a.val - b.val := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· cases hb; simp
· have : NeZero b := ⟨hb⟩
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, val_add, val_neg_of_ne_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt (val_lt _)),
add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.add_mod_left]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_of_lt (val_lt _))
theorem val_cast_eq_val_of_lt {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] {a : ZMod m}
(h : a.val < n) : (a.cast : ZMod n).val = a.val := by
have nzn : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
cases n with
| | zero => cases nzn; simp_all
| succ n => exact Fin.val_cast_of_lt h
theorem cast_cast_zmod_of_le {m n : ℕ} [hm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 1,014 | 1,017 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Doob's upcrossing estimate
Given a discrete real-valued submartingale $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$, denoting by $U_N(a, b)$ the
number of times $f_n$ crossed from below $a$ to above $b$ before time $N$, Doob's upcrossing
estimate (also known as Doob's inequality) states that
$$(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(f_N - a)^+].$$
Doob's upcrossing estimate is an important inequality and is central in proving the martingale
convergence theorems.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing above `b` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing below `a` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat a b f N`: is the predictable process which is 1 if `n` is
between a consecutive pair of lower and upper crossings and is 0 otherwise. Intuitively
one might think of the `upcrossingStrat` as the strategy of buying 1 share whenever the process
crosses below `a` for the first time after selling and selling 1 share whenever the process
crosses above `b` for the first time after buying.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore a b f N`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to
above `b` before time `N`.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossings a b f`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to above
`b`. This takes value in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime`: `upperCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime`: `lowerCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part`: Doob's
upcrossing estimate.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part`: the inequality
obtained by taking the supremum on both sides of Doob's upcrossing estimate.
### References
We mostly follow the proof from [Kallenberg, *Foundations of modern probability*][kallenberg2021]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-!
## Proof outline
In this section, we will denote by $U_N(a, b)$ the number of upcrossings of $(f_n)$ from below $a$
to above $b$ before time $N$.
To define $U_N(a, b)$, we will construct two stopping times corresponding to when $(f_n)$ crosses
below $a$ and above $b$. Namely, we define
$$
\sigma_n := \inf \{n \ge \tau_n \mid f_n \le a\} \wedge N;
$$
$$
\tau_{n + 1} := \inf \{n \ge \sigma_n \mid f_n \ge b\} \wedge N.
$$
These are `lowerCrossingTime` and `upperCrossingTime` in our formalization which are defined
using `MeasureTheory.hitting` allowing us to specify a starting and ending time.
Then, we may simply define $U_N(a, b) := \sup \{n \mid \tau_n < N\}$.
Fixing $a < b \in \mathbb{R}$, we will first prove the theorem in the special case that
$0 \le f_0$ and $a \le f_N$. In particular, we will show
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This is `MeasureTheory.integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral` in our formalization.
To prove this, we use the fact that given a non-negative, bounded, predictable process $(C_n)$
(i.e. $(C_{n + 1})$ is adapted), $(C \bullet f)_n := \sum_{k \le n} C_{k + 1}(f_{k + 1} - f_k)$ is
a submartingale if $(f_n)$ is.
Define $C_n := \sum_{k \le n} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)$. It is easy to see that
$(1 - C_n)$ is non-negative, bounded and predictable, and hence, given a submartingale $(f_n)$,
$(1 - C) \bullet f$ is also a submartingale. Thus, by the submartingale property,
$0 \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_0] \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_N]$ implying
$$
\mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N] \le \mathbb{E}[(1 \bullet f)_N] = \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0].
$$
Furthermore,
\begin{align}
(C \bullet f)_N & =
\sum_{n \le N} \sum_{k \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} \sum_{n \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\sigma_k + 1} - f_{\sigma_k} + f_{\sigma_k + 2} - f_{\sigma_k + 1}
+ \cdots + f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\tau_{k + 1} - 1})\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k})
\ge \sum_{k < U_N(a, b)} (b - a) = (b - a) U_N(a, b)
\end{align}
where the inequality follows since for all $k < U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k} \ge b - a$ while for all $k > U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} = f_{\sigma_k} = f_N$ and
$f_{\tau_{U_N(a, b) + 1}} - f_{\sigma_{U_N(a, b)}} = f_N - a \ge 0$. Hence, we have
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N]
\le \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N],
$$
as required.
To obtain the general case, we simply apply the above to $((f_n - a)^+)_n$.
-/
/-- `lowerCrossingTimeAux a f c N` is the first time `f` reached below `a` after time `c` before
time `N`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
/-- `upperCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
above `b` after `f` reached below `a` for the `n - 1`-th time. -/
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
/-- `lowerCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
below `a` after `f` reached above `b` for the `n`-th time. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime]
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ_eq (ω : Ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω := by
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ]
rfl
end
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem upperCrossingTime_le : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
cases n
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_le]
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ, hitting_le]
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero' : upperCrossingTime a b f ⊥ n ω = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 upperCrossingTime_le
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le ω]
theorem upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, le_hitting upperCrossingTime_le ω]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ]
exact le_hitting lowerCrossingTime_le ω
theorem lowerCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
theorem upperCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} {N : ℕ} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≠ N) :
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω ≤ a := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 lowerCrossingTime_le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
b ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 (hitting_le _)⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_lowerCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans ?_ (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime hn)
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans (stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime hn) ?_
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_succ (hab : a < b) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime hab hn)
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (lowerCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (upperCrossingTime_mono hnm))
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le hn)
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
upperCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le hn)
-- `upperCrossingTime_bound_eq` provides an explicit bound
theorem exists_upperCrossingTime_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
∃ n, upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
by_contra h; push_neg at h
have : StrictMono fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω :=
strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab (h _)
obtain ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, hk⟩ :
∃ (m : _) (_ : m ∈ Set.range fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω), N < m :=
⟨upperCrossingTime a b f N (N + 1) ω, ⟨N + 1, rfl⟩,
lt_of_lt_of_le N.lt_succ_self (StrictMono.id_le this (N + 1))⟩
exact not_le.2 hk upperCrossingTime_le
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove (hab : a < b) :
BddAbove {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N} := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab
refine ⟨k, fun n (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) => ?_⟩
by_contra hn'
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_stabilize (not_le.1 hn').le hk)
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty (hN : 0 < N) :
{n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty :=
⟨0, hN⟩
theorem upperCrossingTime_bound_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N N ω = N := by
by_cases hN' : N < Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)
· refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le ?_
have hmono : StrictMonoOn (fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω)
(Set.Iic (Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)).pred) := by
refine strictMonoOn_Iic_of_lt_succ fun m hm => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab ?_
rw [Nat.lt_pred_iff] at hm
convert Nat.find_min _ hm
convert StrictMonoOn.Iic_id_le hmono N (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hN')
· rw [not_lt] at hN'
exact upperCrossingTime_stabilize hN' (Nat.find_spec (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab))
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le (hab : a < b) (hn : N ≤ n) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le
(le_trans (upperCrossingTime_bound_eq f N ω hab).symm.le (upperCrossingTime_mono hn))
variable {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_crossing (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) ∧
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) := by
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨isStoppingTime_const _ 0, ?_⟩
simp [hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Iic]
· obtain ⟨_, ih₂⟩ := ih
have : IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) := by
intro n
simp_rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime ih₂ (fun _ => lowerCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Ici hf _
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
intro n
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime this (fun _ => upperCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Iic hf _
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.1
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.2
/-- `upcrossingStrat a b f N n` is 1 if `n` is between a consecutive pair of lower and upper
crossings and is 0 otherwise. `upcrossingStrat` is shifted by one index so that it is adapted
rather than predictable. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingStrat (a b : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N,
(Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator 1 n
theorem upcrossingStrat_nonneg : 0 ≤ upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω :=
Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => Set.indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
theorem upcrossingStrat_le_one : upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω ≤ 1 := by
rw [upcrossingStrat, ← Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply]
· exact Set.indicator_le_self' (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
intro i _ j _ hij
simp only [Set.Ico_disjoint_Ico]
obtain hij' | hij' := lt_or_gt_of_ne hij
· rw [min_eq_left (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_right (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at hij'
rw [min_eq_right (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_left (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
theorem Adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
Adapted ℱ (upcrossingStrat a b f N) := by
intro n
change StronglyMeasurable[ℱ n] fun ω =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, ({n | lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω ≤ n} ∩
{n | n < upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω}).indicator 1 n
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun i _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ((hf.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime n).inter ?_)
simp_rw [← not_le]
exact (hf.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime n).compl
theorem Submartingale.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ :=
hf.sum_mul_sub hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (fun _ _ => upcrossingStrat_le_one) fun _ _ =>
upcrossingStrat_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ := by
refine hf.sum_mul_sub (fun n => (adapted_const ℱ 1 n).sub (hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted n))
(?_ : ∀ n ω, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N n) ω ≤ 1) ?_
· exact fun n ω => sub_le_self _ upcrossingStrat_nonneg
· intro n ω
simp [upcrossingStrat_le_one]
theorem Submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] ≤ μ[f n] - μ[f 0] := by
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
have := (hf.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).setIntegral_le (zero_le n) MeasurableSet.univ
rw [setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_univ] at this
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp only [Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty, integral_zero', le_refl]
have h₂ : μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] =
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (f (k + 1) - f k)] -
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
simp only [sub_mul, one_mul, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_apply,
Pi.mul_apply]
refine integral_sub (Integrable.sub (integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)
(integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)) ?_
convert (hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable n using 1
ext; simp
rw [h₂, sub_nonneg] at h₁
refine le_trans h₁ ?_
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_sub, integral_sub' (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _), le_refl]
/-- The number of upcrossings (strictly) before time `N`. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingsBefore [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (ω : Ω) : ℕ :=
sSup {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_bot [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω} : upcrossingsBefore a b f ⊥ ω = ⊥ := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 ω = 0 := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero' : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 = 0 := by
ext ω; exact upcrossingsBefore_zero
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n ≤ upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
haveI : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
(upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN).csSup_mem
((OrderBot.bddBelow _).finite_of_bddAbove (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab))
lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono hn) this
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b)
(hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (not_lt.1 ?_)
convert not_mem_of_csSup_lt hn (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) using 1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_le (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤ N := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· subst hN
rw [upcrossingsBefore_zero]
· refine csSup_le ⟨0, zero_lt_iff.2 hN⟩ fun n (hn : _ < N) => ?_
by_contra hnN
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le hab (not_le.1 hnN).le)
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have h' : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime h
induction' n with k ih
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, bot_eq_zero', eq_self_iff_true,
lowerCrossingTime_zero, true_and, eq_comm]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
· specialize ih (lt_of_le_of_lt (lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h')
have : upperCrossingTime a b f M k.succ ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N k.succ ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h'
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h'
rw [eq_comm, ih.2]
exact hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, eq_comm, this, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl] at h
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M (n + 1) ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have := (crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt hNM
(lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ h)).2
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, eq_comm, this]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
cases n
· simp
· exact (crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt hNM h).1
theorem upcrossingsBefore_mono (hab : a < b) : Monotone fun N ω => upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω := by
intro N M hNM ω
simp only [upcrossingsBefore]
by_cases hemp : {n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty
· refine csSup_le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) hemp fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt hNM hn]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hn hNM
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hemp
simp [hemp, csSup_empty, bot_eq_zero', zero_le']
theorem upcrossingsBefore_lt_of_exists_upcrossing (hab : a < b) {N₁ N₂ : ℕ} (hN₁ : N ≤ N₁)
(hN₁' : f N₁ ω < a) (hN₂ : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hN₂' : b < f N₂ ω) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < upcrossingsBefore a b f (N₂ + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self _) (le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) ?_)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl]
refine ⟨N₂, ⟨?_, Nat.lt_succ_self _⟩, hN₂'.le⟩
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
refine ⟨N₁, ⟨le_trans ?_ hN₁, hN₂⟩, hN₁'.le⟩
by_cases hN : 0 < N
· have : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
Nat.sSup_mem (upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN) (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab)
rw [upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt (hN₁.trans (hN₂.trans <| Nat.le_succ _))
this]
exact this.le
· rw [not_lt, Nat.le_zero] at hN
rw [hN, upcrossingsBefore_zero, upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_zero']
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_of_lt_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n < upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
(upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn)
theorem le_sub_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n < upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) :
b - a ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω :=
sub_le_sub
(stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn).ne)
(stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (lowerCrossingTime_lt_of_lt_upcrossingsBefore hN hab hn).ne)
theorem sub_eq_zero_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b) (hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) :
stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω = 0 := by
have : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
rw [upcrossingsBefore] at hn
rw [← not_lt]
exact fun h => not_le.2 hn (le_csSup (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab) h)
simp [stoppedValue, upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (Nat.le_succ n) this,
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' le_rfl (le_trans this upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime)]
theorem mul_upcrossingsBefore_le (hf : a ≤ f N ω) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, upcrossingStrat a b f N k ω * (f (k + 1) - f k) ω := by
classical
by_cases hN : N = 0
· simp [hN]
simp_rw [upcrossingStrat, Finset.sum_mul, ←
Set.indicator_mul_left _ _ (fun x ↦ (f (x + 1) - f x) ω), Pi.one_apply, Pi.sub_apply, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
have h₁ : ∀ k, ∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, (Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω)
(upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator (fun m => f (m + 1) ω - f m ω) n =
stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω := by
intro k
rw [Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter, (_ : Finset.filter (fun i => i ∈ Set.Ico
(lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)) (Finset.range N) =
Finset.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)),
Finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg _ lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ,
Finset.sum_range_sub fun n => f n ω, Finset.sum_range_sub fun n => f n ω, neg_sub,
sub_add_sub_cancel]
· rfl
· ext i
simp only [Set.mem_Ico, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_Ico,
and_iff_right_iff_imp, and_imp]
exact fun _ h => lt_of_lt_of_le h upperCrossingTime_le
simp_rw [h₁]
have h₂ : ∑ _k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω), (b - a) ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, (stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
calc
∑ _k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω), (b - a) ≤
∑ k ∈ Finset.range (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω),
(stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
refine Finset.sum_le_sum fun i hi =>
le_sub_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (zero_lt_iff.2 hN) hab ?_
rwa [Finset.mem_range] at hi
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, (stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) ω -
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k) ω) := by
refine Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(Finset.range_subset.2 (upcrossingsBefore_le f ω hab)) fun i _ hi => ?_
by_cases hi' : i = upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω
· subst hi'
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt hab (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
by_cases heq : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω = N
· rw [heq, sub_self]
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact le_trans (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime heq) hf
· rw [sub_eq_zero_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt hab]
rw [Finset.mem_range, not_lt] at hi
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hi (Ne.symm hi')
refine le_trans ?_ h₂
rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hfN : ∀ ω, a ≤ f N ω) (hfzero : 0 ≤ f 0) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[f N] :=
calc
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
rw [← integral_const_mul]
refine integral_mono_of_nonneg ?_ ((hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable N) ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun ω => mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hab.le) (Nat.cast_nonneg _)
· filter_upwards with ω
simpa using mul_upcrossingsBefore_le (hfN ω) hab
_ ≤ μ[f N] - μ[f 0] := hf.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le
_ ≤ μ[f N] := (sub_le_self_iff _).2 (integral_nonneg hfzero)
theorem crossing_pos_eq (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N n = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ∧
lowerCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N n = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n := by
have hab' : 0 < b - a := sub_pos.2 hab
have hf : ∀ ω i, b - a ≤ (f i ω - a)⁺ ↔ b ≤ f i ω := by
intro i ω
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rwa [← sub_le_sub_iff_right a, ←
posPart_eq_of_posPart_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le hab' h)]
· rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right a] at h
rwa [posPart_eq_self.2 (le_trans hab'.le h)]
have hf' (ω i) : (f i ω - a)⁺ ≤ 0 ↔ f i ω ≤ a := by rw [posPart_nonpos, sub_nonpos]
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨rfl, ?_⟩
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [lowerCrossingTime_zero, hitting,
Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Iic]
ext ω
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [hf']
· simp_rw [Set.mem_Iic, ← hf' _ _] at h₂
exact False.elim (h₂ h₁)
· simp_rw [Set.mem_Iic, hf' _ _] at h₁
exact False.elim (h₁ h₂)
· rfl
· have : upperCrossingTime 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N (k + 1) =
upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) := by
ext ω
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, ← ih.2, hitting, Set.mem_Ici, tsub_le_iff_right]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, hf ω]
· refine False.elim (h₂ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Ici, not_true_eq_false]
· refine False.elim (h₁ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Ici]
· rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
ext ω
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, this, hitting, Set.mem_Iic]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
· simp_rw [hf' ω]
· refine False.elim (h₂ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Iic, not_true_eq_false]
· refine False.elim (h₁ ?_)
simp_all only [Set.mem_Iic]
· rfl
theorem upcrossingsBefore_pos_eq (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore 0 (b - a) (fun n ω => (f n ω - a)⁺) N ω = upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω := by
simp_rw [upcrossingsBefore, (crossing_pos_eq hab).1]
theorem mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hab : a < b) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[fun ω => (f N ω - a)⁺] := by
refine le_trans (le_of_eq ?_)
(integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral (hf.sub_martingale (martingale_const _ _ _)).pos
(fun ω => posPart_nonneg _)
(fun ω => posPart_nonneg _) (sub_pos.2 hab))
simp_rw [sub_zero, ← upcrossingsBefore_pos_eq hab]
rfl
/-- **Doob's upcrossing estimate**: given a real valued discrete submartingale `f` and real
values `a` and `b`, we have `(b - a) * 𝔼[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ 𝔼[(f N - a)⁺]` where
`upcrossingsBefore a b f N` is the number of times the process `f` crossed from below `a` to above
`b` before the time `N`. -/
theorem Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(a b : ℝ) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (N : ℕ) :
(b - a) * μ[upcrossingsBefore a b f N] ≤ μ[fun ω => (f N ω - a)⁺] := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· exact mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part_aux hf hab
· rw [not_lt, ← sub_nonpos] at hab
exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hab (by positivity))
(integral_nonneg fun ω => posPart_nonneg _)
/-!
### Variant of the upcrossing estimate
Now, we would like to prove a variant of the upcrossing estimate obtained by taking the supremum
over $N$ of the original upcrossing estimate. Namely, we want the inequality
$$
(b - a) \sup_N \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \sup_N \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This inequality is central for the martingale convergence theorem as it provides a uniform bound
for the upcrossings.
We note that on top of taking the supremum on both sides of the inequality, we had also used
the monotone convergence theorem on the left hand side to take the supremum outside of the
integral. To do this, we need to make sure $U_N(a, b)$ is measurable and integrable. Integrability
is easy to check as $U_N(a, b) ≤ N$ and so it suffices to show measurability. Indeed, by
noting that
$$
U_N(a, b) = \sum_{i = 1}^N \mathbf{1}_{\{U_N(a, b) < N\}}
$$
$U_N(a, b)$ is measurable as $\{U_N(a, b) < N\}$ is a measurable set since $U_N(a, b)$ is a
stopping time.
-/
theorem upcrossingsBefore_eq_sum (hab : a < b) : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω =
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 (N + 1), {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 i := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· simp [hN]
rw [← Finset.sum_Ico_consecutive _ (Nat.succ_le_succ zero_le')
(Nat.succ_le_succ (upcrossingsBefore_le f ω hab))]
have h₁ : ∀ k ∈ Finset.Ico 1 (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω + 1),
{n : ℕ | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.indicator 1 k = 1 := by
rintro k hk
| rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hk
rw [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· rfl
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 722 | 724 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Filters with countable intersections and countable separating families
In this file we prove some facts about a filter with countable intersections property on a type with
a countable family of sets that separates points of the space. The main use case is the
`MeasureTheory.ae` filter and a space with countably generated σ-algebra but lemmas apply,
e.g., to the `residual` filter and a T₀ topological space with second countable topology.
To avoid repetition of lemmas for different families of separating sets (measurable sets, open sets,
closed sets), all theorems in this file take a predicate `p : Set α → Prop` as an argument and prove
existence of a countable separating family satisfying this predicate by searching for a
`HasCountableSeparatingOn` typeclass instance.
## Main definitions
- `HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t`: a typeclass saying that there exists a countable set family
`S : Set (Set α)` such that all `s ∈ S` satisfy the predicate `p` and any two distinct points
`x y ∈ t`, `x ≠ y`, can be separated by a set `s ∈ S`. For technical reasons, we formulate the
latter property as "for all `x y ∈ t`, if `x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s` for all `s ∈ S`, then `x = y`".
This typeclass is used in all lemmas in this file to avoid repeating them for open sets, closed
sets, and measurable sets.
### Main results
#### Filters supported on a (sub)singleton
Let `l : Filter α` be a filter with countable intersections property. Let `p : Set α → Prop` be a
property such that there exists a countable family of sets satisfying `p` and separating points of
`α`. Then `l` is supported on a subsingleton: there exists a subsingleton `t` such that
`t ∈ l`.
We formalize various versions of this theorem in
`Filter.exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating`, and
`Filter.exists_singleton_mem_of_forall_separating`.
#### Eventually constant functions
Consider a function `f : α → β`, a filter `l` with countable intersections property, and a countable
separating family of sets of `β`. Suppose that for every `U` from the family, either
`∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U` or `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U`. Then `f` is eventually constant along `l`.
We formalize three versions of this theorem in
`Filter.exists_mem_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating`, and
`Filer.exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_forall_separating`.
#### Eventually equal functions
Two functions are equal along a filter with countable intersections property if the preimages of all
sets from a countable separating family of sets are equal along the filter.
We formalize several versions of this theorem in
`Filter.of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating_mem_iff`, `Filter.of_forall_separating_mem_iff`,
`Filter.of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating_preimage`, and
`Filter.of_forall_separating_preimage`.
## Keywords
filter, countable
-/
open Function Set Filter
/-- We say that a type `α` has a *countable separating family of sets* satisfying a predicate
`p : Set α → Prop` on a set `t` if there exists a countable family of sets `S : Set (Set α)` such
that all sets `s ∈ S` satisfy `p` and any two distinct points `x y ∈ t`, `x ≠ y`, can be separated
by `s ∈ S`: there exists `s ∈ S` such that exactly one of `x` and `y` belongs to `s`.
E.g., if `α` is a `T₀` topological space with second countable topology, then it has a countable
separating family of open sets and a countable separating family of closed sets.
-/
class HasCountableSeparatingOn (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α) : Prop where
exists_countable_separating : ∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y
theorem exists_countable_separating (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α)
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
h.1
theorem exists_nonempty_countable_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀)
(t : Set α) [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Nonempty ∧ S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := exists_countable_separating α p t
⟨insert s₀ S, insert_nonempty _ _, hSc.insert _, forall_insert_of_forall hSp hp,
fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ hSt x hx y hy <| forall_of_forall_insert hxy⟩
theorem exists_seq_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀) (t : Set α)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (S n)) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ n, x ∈ S n ↔ y ∈ S n) → x = y := by
rcases exists_nonempty_countable_separating α hp t with ⟨S, hSne, hSc, hS⟩
rcases hSc.exists_eq_range hSne with ⟨S, rfl⟩
use S
simpa only [forall_mem_range] using hS
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.mono {α} {p₁ p₂ : Set α → Prop} {t₁ t₂ : Set α}
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₁ t₁] (hp : ∀ s, p₁ s → p₂ s) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) :
HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₂ t₂ where
exists_countable_separating :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := h.1
⟨S, hSc, fun s hs ↦ hp s (hSp s hs), fun x hx y hy ↦ hSt x (ht hx) y (ht hy)⟩
| theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.of_subtype {α : Type*} {p : Set α → Prop} {t : Set α}
{q : Set t → Prop} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn t q univ]
(hpq : ∀ U, q U → ∃ V, p V ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' V = U) : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t := by
rcases h.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSq, hS⟩
choose! V hpV hV using fun s hs ↦ hpq s (hSq s hs)
refine ⟨⟨V '' S, hSc.image _, forall_mem_image.2 hpV, fun x hx y hy h ↦ ?_⟩⟩
refine congr_arg Subtype.val (hS ⟨x, hx⟩ trivial ⟨y, hy⟩ trivial fun U hU ↦ ?_)
rw [← hV U hU]
exact h _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hU)
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableSeparatingOn.lean | 116 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
rcases le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h | h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ i hi =>
rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le (add_le_add_right hi _)
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
end Ring
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 1,418 | 1,421 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
/-!
# Reverse of a univariate polynomial
The main definition is `reverse`. Applying `reverse` to a polynomial `f : R[X]` produces
the polynomial with a reversed list of coefficients, equivalent to `X^f.natDegree * f(1/X)`.
The main result is that `reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g`, provided the leading
coefficients of `f` and `g` do not multiply to zero.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAtFun N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
This is the map used by the embedding `revAt`.
-/
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAt N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
Essentially, this embedding is only used for `i ≤ N`.
The advantage of `revAt N i` over `N - i` is that `revAt` is an involution.
-/
def revAt (N : ℕ) : Function.Embedding ℕ ℕ where
toFun i := ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
inj' := revAtFun_inj
/-- We prefer to use the bundled `revAt` over unbundled `revAtFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem revAtFun_eq (N i : ℕ) : revAtFun N i = revAt N i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem revAt_invol {N i : ℕ} : (revAt N) (revAt N i) = i :=
revAtFun_invol
@[simp]
theorem revAt_le {N i : ℕ} (H : i ≤ N) : revAt N i = N - i :=
if_pos H
lemma revAt_eq_self_of_lt {N i : ℕ} (h : N < i) : revAt N i = i := by simp [revAt, Nat.not_le.mpr h]
theorem revAt_add {N O n o : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (ho : o ≤ O) :
revAt (N + O) (n + o) = revAt N n + revAt O o := by
rcases Nat.le.dest hn with ⟨n', rfl⟩
rcases Nat.le.dest ho with ⟨o', rfl⟩
repeat' rw [revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
rw [add_assoc, add_left_comm n' o, ← add_assoc, revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
repeat' rw [add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem revAt_zero (N : ℕ) : revAt N 0 = N := by simp
/-- `reflect N f` is the polynomial such that `(reflect N f).coeff i = f.coeff (revAt N i)`.
In other words, the terms with exponent `[0, ..., N]` now have exponent `[N, ..., 0]`.
In practice, `reflect` is only used when `N` is at least as large as the degree of `f`.
Eventually, it will be used with `N` exactly equal to the degree of `f`. -/
noncomputable def reflect (N : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f⟩
theorem reflect_support (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) :
(reflect N f).support = Finset.image (revAt N) f.support := by
rcases f with ⟨⟩
ext1
simp only [reflect, support_ofFinsupp, support_embDomain, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_reflect (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (i : ℕ) : coeff (reflect N f) i = f.coeff (revAt N i) := by
rcases f with ⟨f⟩
simp only [reflect, coeff]
calc
Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f i = Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f (revAt N (revAt N i)) := by
rw [revAt_invol]
_ = f (revAt N i) := Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _
|
@[simp]
theorem reflect_zero {N : ℕ} : reflect N (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 105 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective (map_one reverseOp)
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (map_mul reverseOp a b)
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, map_add]
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
| p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 194 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
| isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 786 | 787 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| | [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 143 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
import Mathlib.Order.Sublattice
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# Complete Sublattices
This file defines complete sublattices. These are subsets of complete lattices which are closed
under arbitrary suprema and infima. As a standard example one could take the complete sublattice of
invariant submodules of some module with respect to a linear map.
## Main definitions:
* `CompleteSublattice`: the definition of a complete sublattice
* `CompleteSublattice.mk'`: an alternate constructor for a complete sublattice, demanding fewer
hypotheses
* `CompleteSublattice.instCompleteLattice`: a complete sublattice is a complete lattice
* `CompleteSublattice.map`: complete sublattices push forward under complete lattice morphisms.
* `CompleteSublattice.comap`: complete sublattices pull back under complete lattice morphisms.
-/
open Function Set
variable (α β : Type*) [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] (f : CompleteLatticeHom α β)
/-- A complete sublattice is a subset of a complete lattice that is closed under arbitrary suprema
and infima. -/
structure CompleteSublattice extends Sublattice α where
sSupClosed' : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, s ⊆ carrier → sSup s ∈ carrier
sInfClosed' : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, s ⊆ carrier → sInf s ∈ carrier
variable {α β}
namespace CompleteSublattice
/-- To check that a subset is a complete sublattice, one does not need to check that it is closed
under binary `Sup` since this follows from the stronger `sSup` condition. Likewise for infima. -/
@[simps] def mk' (carrier : Set α)
(sSupClosed' : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, s ⊆ carrier → sSup s ∈ carrier)
(sInfClosed' : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, s ⊆ carrier → sInf s ∈ carrier) :
CompleteSublattice α where
carrier := carrier
sSupClosed' := sSupClosed'
sInfClosed' := sInfClosed'
supClosed' := fun x hx y hy ↦ by
suffices x ⊔ y = sSup {x, y} by exact this ▸ sSupClosed' (fun z hz ↦ by aesop)
simp [sSup_singleton]
infClosed' := fun x hx y hy ↦ by
suffices x ⊓ y = sInf {x, y} by exact this ▸ sInfClosed' (fun z hz ↦ by aesop)
simp [sInf_singleton]
variable {L : CompleteSublattice α}
instance instSetLike : SetLike (CompleteSublattice α) α where
coe L := L.carrier
coe_injective' L M h := by cases L; cases M; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance instBot : Bot L where
bot := ⟨⊥, by simpa using L.sSupClosed' <| empty_subset _⟩
instance instTop : Top L where
top := ⟨⊤, by simpa using L.sInfClosed' <| empty_subset _⟩
instance instSupSet : SupSet L where
sSup s := ⟨sSup <| (↑) '' s, L.sSupClosed' image_val_subset⟩
instance instInfSet : InfSet L where
sInf s := ⟨sInf <| (↑) '' s, L.sInfClosed' image_val_subset⟩
theorem sSupClosed {s : Set α} (h : s ⊆ L) : sSup s ∈ L := L.sSupClosed' h
theorem sInfClosed {s : Set α} (h : s ⊆ L) : sInf s ∈ L := L.sInfClosed' h
@[simp] theorem coe_bot : (↑(⊥ : L) : α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_top : (↑(⊤ : L) : α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_sSup (S : Set L) : (↑(sSup S) : α) = sSup {(s : α) | s ∈ S} := rfl
theorem coe_sSup' (S : Set L) : (↑(sSup S) : α) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : α) := by
rw [coe_sSup, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[simp] theorem coe_sInf (S : Set L) : (↑(sInf S) : α) = sInf {(s : α) | s ∈ S} := rfl
theorem coe_sInf' (S : Set L) : (↑(sInf S) : α) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : α) := by
rw [coe_sInf, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
-- Redeclaring to get proper keys for these instances
instance : Max {x // x ∈ L} := Sublattice.instSupCoe
instance : Min {x // x ∈ L} := Sublattice.instInfCoe
instance instCompleteLattice : CompleteLattice L :=
Subtype.coe_injective.completeLattice _
Sublattice.coe_sup Sublattice.coe_inf coe_sSup' coe_sInf' coe_top coe_bot
/-- The natural complete lattice hom from a complete sublattice to the original lattice. -/
def subtype (L : CompleteSublattice α) : CompleteLatticeHom L α where
toFun := Subtype.val
map_sInf' _ := rfl
map_sSup' _ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subtype (L : CompleteSublattice α) : L.subtype = ((↑) : L → α) := rfl
lemma subtype_apply (L : Sublattice α) (a : L) : L.subtype a = a := rfl
lemma subtype_injective (L : CompleteSublattice α) :
Injective <| subtype L := Subtype.coe_injective
/-- The push forward of a complete sublattice under a complete lattice hom is a complete
sublattice. -/
@[simps] def map (L : CompleteSublattice α) : CompleteSublattice β where
carrier := f '' L
supClosed' := L.supClosed.image f
infClosed' := L.infClosed.image f
sSupClosed' := fun s hs ↦ by
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := subset_image_iff.mp hs
rw [← map_sSup]
exact mem_image_of_mem f (sSupClosed ht)
sInfClosed' := fun s hs ↦ by
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := subset_image_iff.mp hs
rw [← map_sInf]
exact mem_image_of_mem f (sInfClosed ht)
@[simp] theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ L.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ L, f a = b := Iff.rfl
/-- The pull back of a complete sublattice under a complete lattice hom is a complete sublattice. -/
@[simps] def comap (L : CompleteSublattice β) : CompleteSublattice α where
carrier := f ⁻¹' L
supClosed' := L.supClosed.preimage f
infClosed' := L.infClosed.preimage f
sSupClosed' s hs := by
simpa only [mem_preimage, map_sSup, SetLike.mem_coe] using sSupClosed <| mapsTo'.mp hs
sInfClosed' s hs := by
simpa only [mem_preimage, map_sInf, SetLike.mem_coe] using sInfClosed <| mapsTo'.mp hs
|
@[simp] theorem mem_comap {L : CompleteSublattice β} {a : α} : a ∈ L.comap f ↔ f a ∈ L := Iff.rfl
protected lemma disjoint_iff {a b : L} :
Disjoint a b ↔ Disjoint (a : α) (b : α) := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← Sublattice.coe_inf, ← coe_bot (L := L),
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteSublattice.lean | 139 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.PreservesHomology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Injective.Basic
/-!
# Exact short complexes
When `S : ShortComplex C`, this file defines a structure
`S.Exact` which expresses the exactness of `S`, i.e. there
exists a homology data `h : S.HomologyData` such that
`h.left.H` is zero. When `[S.HasHomology]`, it is equivalent
to the assertion `IsZero S.homology`.
Almost by construction, this notion of exactness is self dual,
see `Exact.op` and `Exact.unop`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits ZeroObject Preadditive
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace ShortComplex
section
variable
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The assertion that the short complex `S : ShortComplex C` is exact. -/
structure Exact : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists an homology data whose `left.H` field is zero -/
condition : ∃ (h : S.HomologyData), IsZero h.left.H
variable {S}
lemma Exact.hasHomology (h : S.Exact) : S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' h.condition.choose
lemma Exact.hasZeroObject (h : S.Exact) : HasZeroObject C :=
⟨h.condition.choose.left.H, h.condition.choose_spec⟩
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_homology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.homology := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨h', z⟩⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso z h'.left.homologyIso
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_leftHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.leftHomology :=
LeftHomologyData.exact_iff _
lemma exact_iff_isZero_rightHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.rightHomology :=
RightHomologyData.exact_iff _
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.left.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact LeftHomologyData.exact_iff h.left
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff' (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.right.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact RightHomologyData.exact_iff h.right
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_homology_iso_zero [S.HasHomology] [HasZeroObject C] :
S.Exact ↔ Nonempty (S.homology ≅ 0) := by
rw [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isoZero⟩
· rintro ⟨e⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso (isZero_zero C) e
lemma exact_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : S₁.Exact) : S₂.Exact := by
obtain ⟨⟨h, z⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨HomologyData.ofIso e h, z⟩⟩
lemma exact_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact :=
⟨exact_of_iso e, exact_of_iso e.symm⟩
lemma exact_and_mono_f_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Mono S₁.f ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Mono S₂.f := by
have : Mono S₁.f ↔ Mono S₂.f :=
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₁.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₁₂)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_and_epi_g_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Epi S₁.g ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Epi S₂.g := by
have : Epi S₁.g ↔ Epi S₂.g :=
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₃.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₂₃)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_of_isZero_X₂ (h : IsZero S.X₂) : S.Exact := by
rw [(HomologyData.ofZeros S (IsZero.eq_of_tgt h _ _) (IsZero.eq_of_src h _ _)).exact_iff]
exact h
lemma exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, z₁⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁, z₁⟩
· rintro ⟨h₂, z₂⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h₂, z₂⟩
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff_i_p_zero (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h.left.i ≫ h.right.p = 0 := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
rw [h.left.exact_iff, ← h.comm]
constructor
· intro z
rw [IsZero.eq_of_src z h.iso.hom 0, zero_comp, comp_zero]
· intro eq
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.iso.hom, id_comp, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι,
← cancel_epi h.left.π, eq, zero_comp, comp_zero]
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_i_p_zero [S.HasHomology] (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h₁.i ≫ h₂.p = 0 :=
(HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂).exact_iff_i_p_zero
lemma exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 :=
S.exact_iff_i_p_zero _ _
lemma exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero [S.HasHomology]
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
haveI := HasLeftHomology.hasCokernel S
haveI := HasRightHomology.hasKernel S
exact S.exact_iff_i_p_zero (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
(RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
variable {S}
lemma Exact.op (h : S.Exact) : S.op.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.op, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).op⟩⟩
lemma Exact.unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.Exact) : S.unop.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.unop, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).unop⟩⟩
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma exact_op_iff : S.op.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
⟨Exact.unop, Exact.op⟩
@[simp]
lemma exact_unop_iff (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) : S.unop.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
S.unop.exact_op_iff.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesRightHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S]
| [(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have : S.HasHomology := h.hasHomology
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Exact.lean | 217 | 223 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
| toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 168 | 169 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
import Mathlib.Order.Zorn
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Irreducibility in topological spaces
## Main definitions
* `IrreducibleSpace`: a typeclass applying to topological spaces, stating that the space
is nonempty and does not admit a nontrivial pair of disjoint opens.
* `IsIrreducible`: for a nonempty set in a topological space, the property that the set is an
irreducible space in the subspace topology.
## On the definition of irreducible and connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, irreducible spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreirreducible`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as irreducible.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Topology
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Preirreducible
/-- A preirreducible set `s` is one where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def IsPreirreducible (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set X, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty → (s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- An irreducible set `s` is one that is nonempty and
where there is no non-trivial pair of disjoint opens on `s`. -/
def IsIrreducible (s : Set X) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreirreducible s
theorem IsIrreducible.nonempty (h : IsIrreducible s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsIrreducible.isPreirreducible (h : IsIrreducible s) : IsPreirreducible s :=
h.2
theorem isPreirreducible_empty : IsPreirreducible (∅ : Set X) := fun _ _ _ _ _ ⟨_, h1, _⟩ =>
h1.elim
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreirreducible (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreirreducible s :=
fun _u _v _ _ ⟨_x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩ => ⟨y, hys, hs hxs hys ▸ hxu, hyv⟩
theorem isPreirreducible_singleton {x} : IsPreirreducible ({x} : Set X) :=
subsingleton_singleton.isPreirreducible
theorem isIrreducible_singleton {x} : IsIrreducible ({x} : Set X) :=
⟨singleton_nonempty x, isPreirreducible_singleton⟩
theorem isPreirreducible_iff_closure : IsPreirreducible (closure s) ↔ IsPreirreducible s :=
forall₄_congr fun u v hu hv => by
iterate 3 rw [closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff]
exacts [hu.inter hv, hv, hu]
theorem isIrreducible_iff_closure : IsIrreducible (closure s) ↔ IsIrreducible s :=
and_congr closure_nonempty_iff isPreirreducible_iff_closure
protected alias ⟨_, IsPreirreducible.closure⟩ := isPreirreducible_iff_closure
protected alias ⟨_, IsIrreducible.closure⟩ := isIrreducible_iff_closure
theorem exists_preirreducible (s : Set X) (H : IsPreirreducible s) :
∃ t : Set X, IsPreirreducible t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ u, IsPreirreducible u → t ⊆ u → u = t :=
let ⟨m, hsm, hm⟩ :=
zorn_subset_nonempty { t : Set X | IsPreirreducible t }
(fun c hc hcc _ =>
⟨⋃₀ c, fun u v hu hv ⟨y, hy, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hx, hxv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpc, hyp⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hy
let ⟨q, hqc, hxq⟩ := mem_sUnion.1 hx
Or.casesOn (hcc.total hpc hqc)
(fun hpq : p ⊆ q =>
let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hqc u v hu hv ⟨y, hpq hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hxq, hxv⟩
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hqc, hxuv⟩)
fun hqp : q ⊆ p =>
let ⟨x, hxp, hxuv⟩ := hc hpc u v hu hv ⟨y, hyp, hyu⟩ ⟨x, hqp hxq, hxv⟩
⟨x, mem_sUnion_of_mem hxp hpc, hxuv⟩,
fun _ hxc => subset_sUnion_of_mem hxc⟩)
s H
⟨m, hm.prop, hsm, fun _u hu hmu => (hm.eq_of_subset hu hmu).symm⟩
/-- The set of irreducible components of a topological space. -/
def irreducibleComponents (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Set (Set X) :=
{s | Maximal IsIrreducible s}
theorem isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents (s) (H : s ∈ irreducibleComponents X) :
IsClosed s := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, eq_comm]
exact subset_closure.antisymm (H.2 H.1.closure subset_closure)
theorem irreducibleComponents_eq_maximals_closed (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] :
irreducibleComponents X = { s | Maximal (fun x ↦ IsClosed x ∧ IsIrreducible x) s} := by
ext s
constructor
· intro H
exact ⟨⟨isClosed_of_mem_irreducibleComponents _ H, H.1⟩, fun x h e => H.2 h.2 e⟩
· intro H
refine ⟨H.1.2, fun x h e => ?_⟩
have : closure x ≤ s := H.2 ⟨isClosed_closure, h.closure⟩ (e.trans subset_closure)
exact le_trans subset_closure this
/-- A maximal irreducible set that contains a given point. -/
def irreducibleComponent (x : X) : Set X :=
| Classical.choose (exists_preirreducible {x} isPreirreducible_singleton)
theorem irreducibleComponent_property (x : X) :
IsPreirreducible (irreducibleComponent x) ∧
{x} ⊆ irreducibleComponent x ∧
∀ u, IsPreirreducible u → irreducibleComponent x ⊆ u → u = irreducibleComponent x :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_preirreducible {x} isPreirreducible_singleton)
theorem mem_irreducibleComponent {x : X} : x ∈ irreducibleComponent x :=
singleton_subset_iff.1 (irreducibleComponent_property x).2.1
| Mathlib/Topology/Irreducible.lean | 117 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Regular
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
/-!
# Cardinal of sigma-algebras
If a sigma-algebra is generated by a set of sets `s`, then the cardinality of the sigma-algebra is
bounded by `(max #s 2) ^ ℵ₀`. This is stated in `MeasurableSpace.cardinal_generate_measurable_le`
and `MeasurableSpace.cardinalMeasurableSet_le`.
In particular, if `#s ≤ 𝔠`, then the generated sigma-algebra has cardinality at most `𝔠`, see
`MeasurableSpace.cardinal_measurableSet_le_continuum`.
For the proof, we rely on an explicit inductive construction of the sigma-algebra generated by
`s` (instead of the inductive predicate `GenerateMeasurable`). This transfinite inductive
construction is parameterized by an ordinal `< ω₁`, and the cardinality bound is preserved along
each step of the construction. We show in `MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurable_eq_rec` that this
indeed generates this sigma-algebra.
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u}
open Cardinal Ordinal Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
/-- Transfinite induction construction of the sigma-algebra generated by a set of sets `s`. At each
step, we add all elements of `s`, the empty set, the complements of already constructed sets, and
countable unions of already constructed sets.
We index this construction by an arbitrary ordinal for simplicity, but by `ω₁` we will have
generated all the sets in the sigma-algebra.
This construction is very similar to that of the Borel hierarchy. -/
def generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) : Set (Set α) :=
let S := ⋃ j < i, generateMeasurableRec s j
s ∪ {∅} ∪ compl '' S ∪ Set.range fun f : ℕ → S => ⋃ n, (f n).1
termination_by i
theorem self_subset_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
s ⊆ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
apply_rules [subset_union_of_subset_left]
exact subset_rfl
theorem empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : Ordinal) :
∅ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ (mem_singleton ∅)))
theorem compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i j : Ordinal} (h : j < i) {t : Set α}
(ht : t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) : tᶜ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ ⟨t, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, h, ht⟩, rfl⟩)
theorem iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i : Ordinal} {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf : ∀ n, ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) :
⋃ n, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_right _ ⟨fun n => ⟨f n, let ⟨j, hj, hf⟩ := hf n; mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨j, hj, hf⟩⟩, rfl⟩
theorem generateMeasurableRec_mono (s : Set (Set α)) : Monotone (generateMeasurableRec s) := by
intro i j h x hx
| rcases h.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
· exact hx
· convert iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec fun _ => ⟨i, h, hx⟩
exact (iUnion_const x).symm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Card.lean | 74 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym] at h
exact legendreSym.prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the first argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_left {l : List ℤ} {n : ℕ} : J(l.prod | n) = (l.map fun a => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, List.map_nil, one_left]
| cons n l' ih => rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_left, ih]
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the second argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_right {a : ℤ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ n ∈ l, n ≠ 0) :
J(a | l.prod) = (l.map fun n => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, one_right, List.map_nil]
| cons n l' ih =>
have hn := hl n List.mem_cons_self
-- `n ≠ 0`
have hl' := List.prod_ne_zero fun hf => hl 0 (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hf) rfl
-- `l'.prod ≠ 0`
have h := fun m hm => hl m (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hm)
-- `∀ (m : ℕ), m ∈ l' → m ≠ 0`
rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_right' a hn hl', ih h]
/-- If `J(a | n) = -1`, then `n` has a prime divisor `p` such that `J(a | p) = -1`. -/
| theorem eq_neg_one_at_prime_divisor_of_eq_neg_one {a : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (h : J(a | n) = -1) :
∃ p : ℕ, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ J(a | p) = -1 := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 252 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Length
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Reflections, inversions, and inversion sequences
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
We define a *reflection* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`) to be an element of the form
$t = u s_i u^{-1}$, where $u \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. We say that a reflection $t$
is a *left inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`) of an element $w \in W$ if
$\ell(t w) < \ell(w)$, and we say it is a *right inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`) of
$w$ if $\ell(w t) > \ell(w)$. Here $\ell$ is the length function
(see `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean`).
Given a word, we define its *left inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`) and its
*right inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`). We prove that if a word is reduced, then
both of its inversion sequences contain no duplicates. In fact, the right (respectively, left)
inversion sequence of a reduced word for $w$ consists of all of the right (respectively, left)
inversions of $w$ in some order, but we do not prove that in this file.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`
* `CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
/-- `t : W` is a *reflection* of the Coxeter system `cs` if it is of the form
$w s_i w^{-1}$, where $w \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. -/
def IsReflection (t : W) : Prop := ∃ w i, t = w * s i * w⁻¹
theorem isReflection_simple (i : B) : cs.IsReflection (s i) := by use 1, i; simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem pow_two : t ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem mul_self : t * t = 1 := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp
theorem inv : t⁻¹ = t := by
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem isReflection_inv : cs.IsReflection t⁻¹ := by rwa [ht.inv]
theorem odd_length : Odd (ℓ t) := by
suffices cs.lengthParity t = Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 by
simpa [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, ZMod.eq_one_iff_odd]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_left_ne (w : W) : ℓ (w * t) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (w * t) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem length_mul_right_ne (w : W) : ℓ (t * w) ≠ ℓ w := by
suffices cs.lengthParity (t * w) ≠ cs.lengthParity w by
contrapose! this
simp only [lengthParity_eq_ofAdd_length, this]
rcases ht with ⟨w, i, rfl⟩
simp [lengthParity_simple]
theorem conj (w : W) : cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) := by
obtain ⟨u, i, rfl⟩ := ht
use w * u, i
group
end IsReflection
@[simp]
theorem isReflection_conj_iff (w t : W) :
cs.IsReflection (w * t * w⁻¹) ↔ cs.IsReflection t := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa [← mul_assoc] using h.conj w⁻¹
· exact IsReflection.conj (w := w)
/-- The proposition that `t` is a right inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (w t) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsRightInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (w * t) < ℓ w
/-- The proposition that `t` is a left inversion of `w`; i.e., `t` is a reflection and
$\ell (t w) < \ell(w)$. -/
def IsLeftInversion (w t : W) : Prop := cs.IsReflection t ∧ ℓ (t * w) < ℓ w
theorem isRightInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
apply and_congr_right
intro ht
rw [← length_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, ht.inv, cs.length_inv w]
theorem isLeftInversion_inv_iff {w t : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion w⁻¹ t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
convert cs.isRightInversion_inv_iff.symm
simp
namespace IsReflection
variable {cs}
variable {t : W} (ht : cs.IsReflection t)
include ht
theorem isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ ¬cs.IsRightInversion w t := by
unfold IsRightInversion
simp only [mul_assoc, ht.inv, ht.mul_self, mul_one, ht, true_and, not_lt]
constructor
· exact le_of_lt
· exact (lt_of_le_of_ne' · (ht.length_mul_left_ne w))
theorem not_isRightInversion_mul_left_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsRightInversion (w * t) t ↔ cs.IsRightInversion w t :=
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff.not_left
theorem isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ ¬cs.IsLeftInversion w t := by
rw [← isRightInversion_inv_iff, ← isRightInversion_inv_iff, mul_inv_rev, ht.inv,
ht.isRightInversion_mul_left_iff]
theorem not_isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff {w : W} :
¬cs.IsLeftInversion (t * w) t ↔ cs.IsLeftInversion w t :=
ht.isLeftInversion_mul_right_iff.not_left
end IsReflection
@[simp]
theorem isRightInversion_simple_iff_isRightDescent (w : W) (i : B) :
cs.IsRightInversion w (s i) ↔ cs.IsRightDescent w i := by
simp [IsRightInversion, IsRightDescent, cs.isReflection_simple i]
@[simp]
theorem isLeftInversion_simple_iff_isLeftDescent (w : W) (i : B) :
cs.IsLeftInversion w (s i) ↔ cs.IsLeftDescent w i := by
simp [IsLeftInversion, IsLeftDescent, cs.isReflection_simple i]
/-- The right inversion sequence of `ω`. The right inversion sequence of a word
$s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}$ is the sequence
$$s_{i_\ell}\cdots s_{i_1}\cdots s_{i_\ell}, \ldots,
s_{i_{\ell}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_{\ell - 2}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_\ell}, \ldots,
s_{i_{\ell}}s_{i_{\ell - 1}}s_{i_\ell}, s_{i_\ell}.$$
-/
def rightInvSeq (ω : List B) : List W :=
match ω with
| [] => []
| i :: ω => (π ω)⁻¹ * (s i) * (π ω) :: rightInvSeq ω
/-- The left inversion sequence of `ω`. The left inversion sequence of a word
$s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell}$ is the sequence
$$s_{i_1}, s_{i_1}s_{i_2}s_{i_1}, s_{i_1}s_{i_2}s_{i_3}s_{i_2}s_{i_1}, \ldots,
s_{i_1}\cdots s_{i_\ell}\cdots s_{i_1}.$$
-/
def leftInvSeq (ω : List B) : List W :=
match ω with
| [] => []
| i :: ω => s i :: List.map (MulAut.conj (s i)) (leftInvSeq ω)
local prefix:100 "ris" => cs.rightInvSeq
local prefix:100 "lis" => cs.leftInvSeq
@[simp] theorem rightInvSeq_nil : ris [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem leftInvSeq_nil : lis [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem rightInvSeq_singleton (i : B) : ris [i] = [s i] := by simp [rightInvSeq]
@[simp] theorem leftInvSeq_singleton (i : B) : lis [i] = [s i] := rfl
theorem rightInvSeq_concat (ω : List B) (i : B) :
ris (ω.concat i) = (List.map (MulAut.conj (s i)) (ris ω)).concat (s i) := by
induction' ω with j ω ih
· simp
· dsimp [rightInvSeq, concat]
| rw [ih]
simp only [concat_eq_append, wordProd_append, wordProd_cons, wordProd_nil, mul_one, mul_inv_rev,
inv_simple, cons_append, cons.injEq, and_true]
group
private theorem leftInvSeq_eq_reverse_rightInvSeq_reverse (ω : List B) :
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Inversion.lean | 216 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
/-!
# `init` and `tail`
Given a Witt vector `x`, we are sometimes interested
in its components before and after an index `n`.
This file defines those operations, proves that `init` is polynomial,
and shows how that polynomial interacts with `MvPolynomial.bind₁`.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.init n x`: the first `n` coefficients of `x`, as a Witt vector. All coefficients at
indices ≥ `n` are 0.
* `WittVector.tail n x`: the complementary part to `init`. All coefficients at indices < `n` are 0,
otherwise they are the same as in `x`.
* `WittVector.coeff_add_of_disjoint`: if `x` and `y` are Witt vectors such that for every `n`
the `n`-th coefficient of `x` or of `y` is `0`, then the coefficients of `x + y`
are just `x.coeff n + y.coeff n`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
-- type as `\bbW`
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
namespace WittVector
open MvPolynomial
noncomputable section
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- `WittVector.select P x`, for a predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` is the Witt vector
whose `n`-th coefficient is `x.coeff n` if `P n` is true, and `0` otherwise.
-/
def select (P : ℕ → Prop) (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => if P n then x.coeff n else 0
section Select
variable (P : ℕ → Prop)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The polynomial that witnesses that `WittVector.select` is a polynomial function.
`selectPoly n` is `X n` if `P n` holds, and `0` otherwise. -/
def selectPoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if P n then X n else 0
theorem coeff_select (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(select P x).coeff n = aeval x.coeff (selectPoly P n) := by
dsimp [select, selectPoly]
split_ifs with hi
| · rw [aeval_X, mk]; simp only [hi, if_true]
· rw [map_zero, mk]; simp only [hi, if_false]
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`. Made the argument `P` implicit in doing so.
instance select_isPoly {P : ℕ → Prop} : IsPoly p fun _ _ x => select P x := by
use selectPoly P
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/InitTail.lean | 72 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Tactic.OfNat
/-!
# Cast of natural numbers
This file defines the *canonical* homomorphism from the natural numbers into an
`AddMonoid` with a one. In additive monoids with one, there exists a unique
such homomorphism and we store it in the `natCast : ℕ → R` field.
Preferentially, the homomorphism is written as the coercion `Nat.cast`.
## Main declarations
* `NatCast`: Type class for `Nat.cast`.
* `AddMonoidWithOne`: Type class for which `Nat.cast` is a canonical monoid homomorphism from `ℕ`.
* `Nat.cast`: Canonical homomorphism `ℕ → R`.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- The numeral `((0+1)+⋯)+1`. -/
protected def Nat.unaryCast [One R] [Zero R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => Nat.unaryCast n + 1
-- the following four declarations are not in mathlib3 and are relevant to the way numeric
-- literals are handled in Lean 4.
/-- A type class for natural numbers which are greater than or equal to `2`. -/
class Nat.AtLeastTwo (n : ℕ) : Prop where
prop : n ≥ 2
instance instNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} : Nat.AtLeastTwo (n + 2) where
prop := Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le _
namespace Nat.AtLeastTwo
variable {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]
lemma one_lt : 1 < n := prop
lemma ne_one : n ≠ 1 := Nat.ne_of_gt one_lt
end Nat.AtLeastTwo
/-- Recognize numeric literals which are at least `2` as terms of `R` via `Nat.cast`. This
instance is what makes things like `37 : R` type check. Note that `0` and `1` are not needed
because they are recognized as terms of `R` (at least when `R` is an `AddMonoidWithOne`) through
`Zero` and `One`, respectively. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
instance (priority := 100) instOfNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
OfNat R n where
ofNat := n.cast
library_note "no_index around OfNat.ofNat"
/--
When writing lemmas about `OfNat.ofNat` that assume `Nat.AtLeastTwo`, the term needs to be wrapped
in `no_index` so as not to confuse `simp`, as `no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Rather than referencing this library note, use `ofNat(n)` as a shorthand for
`no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Some discussion is [on Zulip here](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Polynomial.2Ecoeff.20example/near/395438147).
-/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem Nat.cast_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast ofNat(n) : R) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[deprecated Nat.cast_ofNat (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem Nat.cast_eq_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast n : R) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
/-! ### Additive monoids with one -/
/-- An `AddMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoid` with a `1`.
It also contains data for the unique homomorphism `ℕ → R`. -/
class AddMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends NatCast R, AddMonoid R, One R where
natCast := Nat.unaryCast
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` sends `0 : ℕ` to `0 : R`. -/
natCast_zero : natCast 0 = 0 := by intros; rfl
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` is a homomorphism. -/
natCast_succ : ∀ n, natCast (n + 1) = natCast n + 1 := by intros; rfl
/-- An `AddCommMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoidWithOne` satisfying `a + b = b + a`. -/
class AddCommMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends AddMonoidWithOne R, AddCommMonoid R
library_note "coercion into rings"
/--
Coercions such as `Nat.castCoe` that go from a concrete structure such as
`ℕ` to an arbitrary ring `R` should be set up as follows:
```lean
instance : CoeTail ℕ R where coe := ...
instance : CoeHTCT ℕ R where coe := ...
```
It needs to be `CoeTail` instead of `Coe` because otherwise type-class
inference would loop when constructing the transitive coercion `ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ...`.
Sometimes we also need to declare the `CoeHTCT` instance
if we need to shadow another coercion
(e.g. `Nat.cast` should be used over `Int.ofNat`).
-/
namespace Nat
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
-- Lemmas about `Nat.succ` need to get a low priority, so that they are tried last.
-- This is because `Nat.succ _` matches `1`, `3`, `x+1`, etc.
-- Rewriting would then produce really wrong terms.
@[norm_cast 500]
theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((succ n : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ _
theorem cast_add_one (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ite (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (m n : ℕ) :
((ite P m n : ℕ) : R) = ite P (m : R) (n : R) := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
end Nat
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] : ((1 : ℕ) : R) = 1 := by
rw [cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne R] (m n : ℕ) : ((m + n : ℕ) : R) = m + n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [add_succ, cast_succ, ih, cast_succ, add_assoc]
/-- Computationally friendlier cast than `Nat.unaryCast`, using binary representation. -/
protected def binCast [Zero R] [One R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => if (n + 1) % 2 = 0
then (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2))
else (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + 1
@[simp]
theorem binCast_eq [AddMonoidWithOne R] (n : ℕ) :
(Nat.binCast n : R) = ((n : ℕ) : R) := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind k hk => ?_
cases k with
| zero => rw [Nat.binCast, Nat.cast_zero]
| succ k =>
rw [Nat.binCast]
by_cases h : (k + 1) % 2 = 0
· conv => rhs; rw [← Nat.mod_add_div (k+1) 2]
rw [if_pos h, hk _ <| Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos k) (Nat.le_refl 2), ← Nat.cast_add]
rw [h, Nat.zero_add, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
· conv => rhs; rw [← Nat.mod_add_div (k+1) 2]
rw [if_neg h, hk _ <| Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos k) (Nat.le_refl 2), ← Nat.cast_add]
have h1 := Or.resolve_left (Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (succ k)) h
rw [h1, Nat.add_comm 1, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
theorem cast_two [NatCast R] : ((2 : ℕ) : R) = (2 : R) := rfl
theorem cast_three [NatCast R] : ((3 : ℕ) : R) = (3 : R) := rfl
theorem cast_four [NatCast R] : ((4 : ℕ) : R) = (4 : R) := rfl
attribute [simp, norm_cast] Int.natAbs_ofNat
end Nat
/-- `AddMonoidWithOne` implementation using unary recursion. -/
protected abbrev AddMonoidWithOne.unary [AddMonoid R] [One R] : AddMonoidWithOne R :=
{ ‹One R›, ‹AddMonoid R› with }
/-- `AddMonoidWithOne` implementation using binary recursion. -/
protected abbrev AddMonoidWithOne.binary [AddMonoid R] [One R] : AddMonoidWithOne R :=
{ ‹One R›, ‹AddMonoid R› with
natCast := Nat.binCast,
natCast_zero := by simp only [Nat.binCast, Nat.cast],
natCast_succ := fun n => by
letI : AddMonoidWithOne R := AddMonoidWithOne.unary
rw [Nat.binCast_eq, Nat.binCast_eq, Nat.cast_succ] }
theorem one_add_one_eq_two [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 1 + 1 = (2 : R) := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem two_add_one_eq_three [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 2 + 1 = (3 : R) := by
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem three_add_one_eq_four [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 3 + 1 = (4 : R) := by
rw [← two_add_one_eq_three, ← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one,
← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Nat.cast_add]
apply congrArg
decide
theorem two_add_two_eq_four [AddMonoidWithOne R] : 2 + 2 = (4 : R) := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_one, ← three_add_one_eq_four,
← two_add_one_eq_three, add_assoc]
section nsmul
@[simp] lemma nsmul_one {A} [AddMonoidWithOne A] : ∀ n : ℕ, n • (1 : A) = n
| 0 => by simp [zero_nsmul]
| n + 1 => by simp [succ_nsmul, nsmul_one n]
end nsmul
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean | 242 | 246 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SupClosed
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
import Mathlib.Order.Zorn
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# Compactness properties for complete lattices
For complete lattices, there are numerous equivalent ways to express the fact that the relation `>`
is well-founded. In this file we define three especially-useful characterisations and provide
proofs that they are indeed equivalent to well-foundedness.
## Main definitions
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupClosedCompact`
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupFiniteCompact`
* `CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement`
* `IsCompactlyGenerated`
## Main results
The main result is that the following four conditions are equivalent for a complete lattice:
* `well_founded (>)`
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupClosedCompact`
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupFiniteCompact`
* `∀ k, CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement k`
This is demonstrated by means of the following four lemmas:
* `CompleteLattice.WellFounded.isSupFiniteCompact`
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupFiniteCompact.isSupClosedCompact`
* `CompleteLattice.IsSupClosedCompact.wellFounded`
* `CompleteLattice.isSupFiniteCompact_iff_all_elements_compact`
We also show well-founded lattices are compactly generated
(`CompleteLattice.isCompactlyGenerated_of_wellFounded`).
## References
- [G. Călugăreanu, *Lattice Concepts of Module Theory*][calugareanu]
## Tags
complete lattice, well-founded, compact
-/
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : ι → α}
namespace CompleteLattice
variable (α)
/-- A compactness property for a complete lattice is that any `sup`-closed non-empty subset
contains its `sSup`. -/
def IsSupClosedCompact : Prop :=
∀ (s : Set α) (_ : s.Nonempty), SupClosed s → sSup s ∈ s
/-- A compactness property for a complete lattice is that any subset has a finite subset with the
same `sSup`. -/
def IsSupFiniteCompact : Prop :=
∀ s : Set α, ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ sSup s = t.sup id
/-- An element `k` of a complete lattice is said to be compact if any set with `sSup`
above `k` has a finite subset with `sSup` above `k`. Such an element is also called
"finite" or "S-compact". -/
def IsCompactElement {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] (k : α) :=
∀ s : Set α, k ≤ sSup s → ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ k ≤ t.sup id
theorem isCompactElement_iff.{u} {α : Type u} [CompleteLattice α] (k : α) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement k ↔
∀ (ι : Type u) (s : ι → α), k ≤ iSup s → ∃ t : Finset ι, k ≤ t.sup s := by
classical
constructor
· intro H ι s hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := H (Set.range s) hs
have : ∀ x : t, ∃ i, s i = x := fun x => ht x.prop
choose f hf using this
refine ⟨Finset.univ.image f, ht'.trans ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro b hb
rw [← show s (f ⟨b, hb⟩) = id b from hf _]
exact Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_image_of_mem f <| Finset.mem_univ (Subtype.mk b hb))
· intro H s hs
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
H s Subtype.val
(by
delta iSup
rwa [Subtype.range_coe])
refine ⟨t.image Subtype.val, by simp, ht.trans ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_le_iff]
exact fun x hx => @Finset.le_sup _ _ _ _ _ id _ (Finset.mem_image_of_mem Subtype.val hx)
/-- An element `k` is compact if and only if any directed set with `sSup` above
`k` already got above `k` at some point in the set. -/
theorem isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le (k : α) :
IsCompactElement k ↔
∀ s : Set α, s.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s → k ≤ sSup s → ∃ x : α, x ∈ s ∧ k ≤ x := by
classical
constructor
· intro hk s hne hdir hsup
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hk s hsup
-- certainly every element of t is below something in s, since ↑t ⊆ s.
have t_below_s : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := fun x hxt => ⟨x, ht.left hxt, le_rfl⟩
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hsupx⟩⟩ := Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed s hne hdir t t_below_s
exact ⟨x, ⟨hxs, le_trans ht.right hsupx⟩⟩
· intro hk s hsup
-- Consider the set of finite joins of elements of the (plain) set s.
let S : Set α := { x | ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ x = t.sup id }
-- S is directed, nonempty, and still has sup above k.
have dir_US : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S := by
rintro x ⟨c, hc⟩ y ⟨d, hd⟩
use x ⊔ y
constructor
· use c ∪ d
constructor
· simp only [hc.left, hd.left, Set.union_subset_iff, Finset.coe_union, and_self_iff]
· simp only [hc.right, hd.right, Finset.sup_union]
simp only [and_self_iff, le_sup_left, le_sup_right]
have sup_S : sSup s ≤ sSup S := by
apply sSup_le_sSup
intro x hx
use {x}
simpa only [and_true, id, Finset.coe_singleton, eq_self_iff_true,
Finset.sup_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
have Sne : S.Nonempty := by
suffices ⊥ ∈ S from Set.nonempty_of_mem this
use ∅
simp only [Set.empty_subset, Finset.coe_empty, Finset.sup_empty, eq_self_iff_true,
and_self_iff]
-- Now apply the defn of compact and finish.
obtain ⟨j, ⟨hjS, hjk⟩⟩ := hk S Sne dir_US (le_trans hsup sup_S)
obtain ⟨t, ⟨htS, htsup⟩⟩ := hjS
use t
exact ⟨htS, by rwa [← htsup]⟩
theorem IsCompactElement.exists_finset_of_le_iSup {k : α} (hk : IsCompactElement k) {ι : Type*}
(f : ι → α) (h : k ≤ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset ι, k ≤ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i := by
classical
let g : Finset ι → α := fun s => ⨆ i ∈ s, f i
have h1 : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (Set.range g) := by
rintro - ⟨s, rfl⟩ - ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact
⟨g (s ∪ t), ⟨s ∪ t, rfl⟩, iSup_le_iSup_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left,
iSup_le_iSup_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right⟩
have h2 : k ≤ sSup (Set.range g) :=
h.trans
(iSup_le fun i =>
le_sSup_of_le ⟨{i}, rfl⟩
(le_iSup_of_le i (le_iSup_of_le (Finset.mem_singleton_self i) le_rfl)))
obtain ⟨-, ⟨s, rfl⟩, hs⟩ :=
(isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le α k).mp hk (Set.range g) (Set.range_nonempty g)
h1 h2
exact ⟨s, hs⟩
/-- A compact element `k` has the property that any directed set lying strictly below `k` has
its `sSup` strictly below `k`. -/
theorem IsCompactElement.directed_sSup_lt_of_lt {α : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {k : α}
(hk : IsCompactElement k) {s : Set α} (hemp : s.Nonempty) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s)
(hbelow : ∀ x ∈ s, x < k) : sSup s < k := by
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le] at hk
by_contra h
have sSup' : sSup s ≤ k := sSup_le s k fun s hs => (hbelow s hs).le
replace sSup : sSup s = k := eq_iff_le_not_lt.mpr ⟨sSup', h⟩
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hkx⟩ := hk s hemp hdir sSup.symm.le
obtain hxk := hbelow x hxs
exact hxk.ne (hxk.le.antisymm hkx)
theorem isCompactElement_finsetSup {α β : Type*} [CompleteLattice α] {f : β → α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, IsCompactElement (f x)) : IsCompactElement (s.sup f) := by
classical
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro d hemp hdir hsup
rw [← Function.id_comp f]
rw [← Finset.sup_image]
apply Finset.sup_le_of_le_directed d hemp hdir
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨p, ⟨hps, rfl⟩⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hx
specialize h p hps
rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le] at h
specialize h d hemp hdir (le_trans (Finset.le_sup hps) hsup)
simpa only [exists_prop]
theorem WellFoundedGT.isSupFiniteCompact [WellFoundedGT α] :
IsSupFiniteCompact α := fun s => by
let S := { x | ∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.sup id = x }
obtain ⟨m, ⟨t, ⟨ht₁, rfl⟩⟩, hm⟩ := wellFounded_gt.has_min S ⟨⊥, ∅, by simp⟩
refine ⟨t, ht₁, (sSup_le _ _ fun y hy => ?_).antisymm ?_⟩
· classical
rw [eq_of_le_of_not_lt (Finset.sup_mono (t.subset_insert y))
(hm _ ⟨insert y t, by simp [Set.insert_subset_iff, hy, ht₁]⟩)]
simp
· rw [Finset.sup_id_eq_sSup]
exact sSup_le_sSup ht₁
theorem IsSupFiniteCompact.isSupClosedCompact (h : IsSupFiniteCompact α) :
IsSupClosedCompact α := by
intro s hne hsc; obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h s; clear h
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· subst h
rw [Finset.sup_empty] at ht₂
rw [ht₂]
simp [eq_singleton_bot_of_sSup_eq_bot_of_nonempty ht₂ hne]
· rw [ht₂]
exact hsc.finsetSup_mem h ht₁
theorem IsSupClosedCompact.wellFoundedGT (h : IsSupClosedCompact α) :
WellFoundedGT α where
wf := by
refine RelEmbedding.wellFounded_iff_no_descending_seq.mpr ⟨fun a => ?_⟩
suffices sSup (Set.range a) ∈ Set.range a by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp this
have h' : sSup (Set.range a) < a (n + 1) := by
change _ > _
simp [← hn, a.map_rel_iff]
apply lt_irrefl (a (n + 1))
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ h'
apply le_sSup
apply Set.mem_range_self
apply h (Set.range a)
· use a 37
apply Set.mem_range_self
· rintro x ⟨m, hm⟩ y ⟨n, hn⟩
use m ⊔ n
rw [← hm, ← hn]
apply RelHomClass.map_sup a
theorem isSupFiniteCompact_iff_all_elements_compact :
IsSupFiniteCompact α ↔ ∀ k : α, IsCompactElement k := by
refine ⟨fun h k s hs => ?_, fun h s => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ⟨hts, htsup⟩⟩ := h s
use t, hts
rwa [← htsup]
· obtain ⟨t, ⟨hts, htsup⟩⟩ := h (sSup s) s (by rfl)
have : sSup s = t.sup id := by
suffices t.sup id ≤ sSup s by apply le_antisymm <;> assumption
simp only [id, Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro x hx
exact le_sSup _ _ (hts hx)
| exact ⟨t, hts, this⟩
open List in
theorem wellFoundedGT_characterisations : List.TFAE
[WellFoundedGT α, IsSupFiniteCompact α, IsSupClosedCompact α, ∀ k : α, IsCompactElement k] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := @WellFoundedGT.isSupFiniteCompact α _
tfae_have 2 → 3 := IsSupFiniteCompact.isSupClosedCompact α
tfae_have 3 → 1 := IsSupClosedCompact.wellFoundedGT α
tfae_have 2 ↔ 4 := isSupFiniteCompact_iff_all_elements_compact α
tfae_finish
theorem wellFoundedGT_iff_isSupFiniteCompact :
WellFoundedGT α ↔ IsSupFiniteCompact α :=
| Mathlib/Order/CompactlyGenerated/Basic.lean | 248 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Retract
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
/-!
# Quasi-isomorphisms
A chain map is a quasi-isomorphism if it induces isomorphisms on homology.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
universe v u
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
{c : ComplexShape ι} {K L M K' L' : HomologicalComplex C c}
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism in degree `i`
when it induces a quasi-isomorphism of short complexes `K.sc i ⟶ L.sc i`. -/
class QuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] : Prop where
quasiIso : ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact h.quasiIso
· intro h
exact ⟨h⟩
instance quasiIsoAt_of_isIso (f : K ⟶ L) [IsIso f] (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
infer_instance
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff' (f : K ⟶ L) (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [(K.sc' i j k).HasHomology] [(L.sc' i j k).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f j ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).map f) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff]
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_of_arrow_mk_iso _ _
(Arrow.isoOfNatIso (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) (Arrow.mk f))
lemma quasiIsoAt_of_retract {f : K ⟶ L} {f' : K' ⟶ L'}
(h : RetractArrow f f') (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[K'.HasHomology i] [L'.HasHomology i] [hf' : QuasiIsoAt f' i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff] at hf' ⊢
have : RetractArrow ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f)
((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map f') := h.map (shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapArrow
exact ShortComplex.quasiIso_of_retract this
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff]
rfl
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hK : K.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ L.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hK ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hK (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h).symm
· intro hL
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
(hL : L.ExactAt i) :
QuasiIsoAt f i ↔ K.ExactAt i := by
simp only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff, exactAt_iff,
ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology] at hL ⊢
constructor
· intro h
exact IsZero.of_iso hL (@asIso _ _ _ _ _ h)
· intro hK
exact ⟨⟨0, IsZero.eq_of_src hK _ _, IsZero.eq_of_tgt hL _ _⟩⟩
lemma exactAt_iff_of_quasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [QuasiIsoAt f i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ L.ExactAt i :=
⟨fun hK => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt f i hK).1 inferInstance,
fun hL => (quasiIsoAt_iff_exactAt' f i hL).1 inferInstance⟩
instance (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [hf : QuasiIsoAt f i] :
IsIso (homologyMap f i) := by
simpa only [quasiIsoAt_iff, ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff] using hf
/-- The isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ L.homology i` induced by a morphism `f : K ⟶ L` such
that `[QuasiIsoAt f i]` holds. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoOfQuasiIsoAt (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] : K.homology i ≅ L.homology i :=
asIso (homologyMap f i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_hom_inv_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
homologyMap f i ≫ (isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoOfQuasiIsoAt_inv_hom_id (f : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
[QuasiIsoAt f i] :
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv ≫ homologyMap f i = 𝟙 _ :=
(isoOfQuasiIsoAt f i).inv_hom_id
lemma CochainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : CochainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 0 0 1).HasHomology] :
QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 0 0 1).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
lemma ChainComplex.quasiIsoAt₀_iff {K L : ChainComplex C ℕ} (f : K ⟶ L)
[K.HasHomology 0] [L.HasHomology 0] [(K.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] [(L.sc' 1 0 0).HasHomology] :
| QuasiIsoAt f 0 ↔
ShortComplex.QuasiIso ((HomologicalComplex.shortComplexFunctor' C _ 1 0 0).map f) :=
quasiIsoAt_iff' _ _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes `f : K ⟶ L` is a quasi-isomorphism when it
is so in every degree, i.e. when the induced maps `homologyMap f i : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i`
are all isomorphisms (see `quasiIso_iff` and `quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap`). -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/QuasiIso.lean | 130 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.TakeWhile
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Sorting algorithms on lists
In this file we define `List.Sorted r l` to be an alias for `List.Pairwise r l`.
This alias is preferred in the case that `r` is a `<` or `≤`-like relation.
Then we define the sorting algorithm
`List.insertionSort` and prove its correctness.
-/
open List.Perm
universe u v
namespace List
/-!
### The predicate `List.Sorted`
-/
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
/-- `Sorted r l` is the same as `List.Pairwise r l`, preferred in the case that `r`
is a `<` or `≤`-like relation (transitive and antisymmetric or asymmetric) -/
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
nonrec theorem Sorted.cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α}
(hab : r a b) (h : Sorted r (b :: l)) : Sorted r (a :: b :: l) :=
h.cons <| forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hab, fun _ hx => _root_.trans hab <| rel_of_sorted_cons h _ hx⟩
theorem sorted_cons_cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α} :
Sorted r (b :: a :: l) ↔ r b a ∧ Sorted r (a :: l) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨rel_of_sorted_cons h _ mem_cons_self, h.of_cons⟩
· rintro ⟨h, ha⟩
exact ha.cons h
theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
theorem Sorted.le_head! [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· > ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : a ≤ l.head! := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
@[simp]
theorem sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, r a b) ∧ Sorted r l :=
pairwise_cons
protected theorem Sorted.nodup {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) :
Nodup l :=
Pairwise.nodup h
protected theorem Sorted.filter {l : List α} (f : α → Bool) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted r (filter f l) :=
h.sublist filter_sublist
theorem eq_of_perm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) (hs₁ : Sorted r l₁)
(hs₂ : Sorted r l₂) : l₁ = l₂ := by
induction hs₁ generalizing l₂ with
| nil => exact hp.nil_eq
| @cons a l₁ h₁ hs₁ IH =>
have : a ∈ l₂ := hp.subset mem_cons_self
rcases append_of_mem this with ⟨u₂, v₂, rfl⟩
have hp' := (perm_cons a).1 (hp.trans perm_middle)
obtain rfl := IH hp' (hs₂.sublist <| by simp)
change a :: u₂ ++ v₂ = u₂ ++ ([a] ++ v₂)
rw [← append_assoc]
congr
have : ∀ x ∈ u₂, x = a := fun x m =>
antisymm ((pairwise_append.1 hs₂).2.2 _ m a mem_cons_self) (h₁ _ (by simp [m]))
rw [(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (a :: u₂)).2,
(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (u₂ ++ [a])).2] <;>
constructor <;>
simp [iff_true_intro this, or_comm]
theorem Sorted.eq_of_mem_iff [IsAntisymm α r] [IsIrrefl α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α}
(h₁ : Sorted r l₁) (h₂ : Sorted r l₂) (h : ∀ a : α, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((perm_ext_iff_of_nodup h₁.nodup h₂.nodup).2 h) h₁ h₂
theorem sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ <+~ l₂)
(hs₁ : l₁.Sorted r) (hs₂ : l₂.Sorted r) : l₁ <+ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, h, h'⟩ := hp
rwa [← eq_of_perm_of_sorted h (hs₂.sublist h') hs₁]
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut lemma.
theorem sorted_singleton (a : α) : Sorted r [a] := by
simp
theorem sorted_lt_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· < ·) (range n) := by
rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get]
simp
theorem sorted_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Sorted r (replicate n a) ↔ n ≤ 1 ∨ r a a :=
pairwise_replicate
theorem sorted_le_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) [Preorder α] : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (replicate n a) := by
simp [sorted_replicate]
theorem sorted_le_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
(sorted_lt_range n).le_of_lt
lemma sorted_lt_range' (a b) {s} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
Sorted (· < ·) (range' a b s) := by
induction b generalizing a with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [List.range'_succ]
refine List.sorted_cons.mpr ⟨fun b hb ↦ ?_, @ih (a + s)⟩
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hs))
(List.left_le_of_mem_range' hb)
lemma sorted_le_range' (a b s) :
Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range' a b s) := by
by_cases hs : s ≠ 0
· exact (sorted_lt_range' a b hs).le_of_lt
· rw [ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] at hs
simpa [hs] using sorted_le_replicate b a
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_lt {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length} (hab : a < b) :
r (l.get a) (l.get b) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.1 h _ _ hab
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_le [IsRefl α r] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length}
(hab : a ≤ b) : r (l.get a) (l.get b) := by
obtain rfl | hlt := Fin.eq_or_lt_of_le hab; exacts [refl _, h.rel_get_of_lt hlt]
theorem Sorted.rel_of_mem_take_of_mem_drop {l : List α} (h : List.Sorted r l) {k : ℕ} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ List.take k l) (hy : y ∈ List.drop k l) : r x y := by
obtain ⟨iy, hiy, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hy
obtain ⟨ix, hix, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [getElem_take, getElem_drop]
rw [length_take] at hix
exact h.rel_get_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_right _ (Nat.lt_min.mp hix).left)
/--
If a list is sorted with respect to a decidable relation,
then it is sorted with respect to the corresponding Bool-valued relation.
-/
theorem Sorted.decide [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted (fun a b => decide (r a b) = true) l := by
refine h.imp fun {a b} h => by simpa using h
end Sorted
section Monotone
variable {n : ℕ} {α : Type u} {f : Fin n → α}
open scoped Relator in
theorem sorted_ofFn_iff {r : α → α → Prop} : (ofFn f).Sorted r ↔ ((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f := by
simp_rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get, get_ofFn, Relator.LiftFun]
exact Iff.symm (Fin.rightInverse_cast _).surjective.forall₂
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_lt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ StrictMono f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_gt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ StrictAnti f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_le_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ Monotone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans monotone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from a monotone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Monotone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_le_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_ge_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ Antitone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans antitone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from an antitone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Antitone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_ge_ofFn_iff
end Monotone
lemma Sorted.filterMap {α β : Type*} {p : α → Option β} {l : List α}
{r : α → α → Prop} {r' : β → β → Prop} (hl : l.Sorted r)
(hp : ∀ (a b : α) (c d : β), p a = some c → p b = some d → r a b → r' c d) :
(l.filterMap p).Sorted r' := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [List.filterMap_cons]
cases ha : p a with
| none =>
exact ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right
| some b =>
rw [List.sorted_cons]
refine ⟨fun x hx ↦ ?_, ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := List.mem_filterMap.mp hx
exact hp a u b x ha hu' <| (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).left u hu
end List
open List
namespace RelEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem sorted_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} : (l.map e).Sorted rb ↔ l.Sorted ra := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_swap_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (Function.swap rb) ↔ l.Sorted (Function.swap ra) := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
end RelEmbedding
namespace OrderEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_listMap
| @[simp]
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_swap_listMap
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 278 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
| theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 72 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Additive
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Box-additive functions defined by measures
In this file we prove a few simple facts about rectangular boxes, partitions, and measures:
- given a box `I : Box ι`, its coercion to `Set (ι → ℝ)` and `I.Icc` are measurable sets;
- if `μ` is a locally finite measure, then `(I : Set (ι → ℝ))` and `I.Icc` have finite measure;
- if `μ` is a locally finite measure, then `fun J ↦ μ.real J` is a box additive function.
For the last statement, we both prove it as a proposition and define a bundled
`BoxIntegral.BoxAdditiveMap` function.
## Tags
rectangular box, measure
-/
open Set
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace BoxIntegral
open MeasureTheory
namespace Box
variable (I : Box ι)
theorem measure_Icc_lt_top (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : μ (Box.Icc I) < ∞ :=
show μ (Icc I.lower I.upper) < ∞ from I.isCompact_Icc.measure_lt_top
theorem measure_coe_lt_top (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : μ I < ∞ :=
(measure_mono <| coe_subset_Icc).trans_lt (I.measure_Icc_lt_top μ)
section Countable
variable [Countable ι]
theorem measurableSet_coe : MeasurableSet (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) := by
rw [coe_eq_pi]
exact MeasurableSet.univ_pi fun i => measurableSet_Ioc
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Box.Icc I) :=
_root_.measurableSet_Icc
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Box.Ioo I) :=
MeasurableSet.univ_pi fun _ => _root_.measurableSet_Ioo
end Countable
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem coe_ae_eq_Icc : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) =ᵐ[volume] Box.Icc I := by
rw [coe_eq_pi]
exact Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc : Box.Ioo I =ᵐ[volume] Box.Icc I :=
Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
end Box
theorem Prepartition.measure_iUnion_toReal [Finite ι] {I : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I)
(μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ.real π.iUnion = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, μ.real J := by
simp only [measureReal_def]
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_sum (fun J _ => (J.measure_coe_lt_top μ).ne), π.iUnion_def]
simp only [← mem_boxes]
rw [measure_biUnion_finset π.pairwiseDisjoint]
exact fun J _ => J.measurableSet_coe
end BoxIntegral
open BoxIntegral BoxIntegral.Box
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- If `μ` is a locally finite measure on `ℝⁿ`, then `fun J ↦ μ.real J` is a box-additive
function. -/
@[simps]
def toBoxAdditive [Finite ι] (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : ι →ᵇᵃ[⊤] ℝ where
toFun J := μ.real J
sum_partition_boxes' J _ π hπ := by rw [← π.measure_iUnion_toReal, hπ.iUnion_eq]
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
namespace BoxIntegral
open MeasureTheory
namespace Box
variable [Fintype ι]
-- This is not a `simp` lemma because the left hand side simplifies already.
-- See `volume_apply'` for the relevant `simp` lemma.
theorem volume_apply (I : Box ι) :
(volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).toBoxAdditive I = ∏ i, (I.upper i - I.lower i) := by
rw [Measure.toBoxAdditive_apply, coe_eq_pi, measureReal_def,
Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal I.lower_le_upper]
@[simp]
theorem volume_apply' (I : Box ι) :
((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) I).toReal = ∏ i, (I.upper i - I.lower i) := by
rw [coe_eq_pi, Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal I.lower_le_upper]
theorem volume_face_mul {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (I : Box (Fin (n + 1))) :
(∏ j, ((I.face i).upper j - (I.face i).lower j)) * (I.upper i - I.lower i) =
∏ j, (I.upper j - I.lower j) := by
simp only [face_lower, face_upper, (· ∘ ·), Fin.prod_univ_succAbove _ i, mul_comm]
|
end Box
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Measure.lean | 127 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
(hs.subset inter_subset_left).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_add_encard_inter]
theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_union (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
rw [add_comm, ncard_union_add_ncard_inter _ _ hs ht]
theorem ncard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard + t.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := (s ∪ t).finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac
rw [h.cast_ncard_eq, (h.subset subset_union_left).cast_ncard_eq,
(h.subset subset_union_right).cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_union_le
rw [h.ncard]
apply zero_le
theorem ncard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_eq h]
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard + s.ncard = t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq, ht.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h]
theorem ncard_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).ncard = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
obtain ht | ht := t.finite_or_infinite
· rw [← ncard_diff_add_ncard_of_subset hst ht, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.zero_sub, (ht.diff hs).ncard]
lemma cast_ncard_sdiff {R : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne R] (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((t \ s).ncard : R) = t.ncard - s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_diff hst (ht.subset hst), Nat.cast_sub (ncard_le_ncard hst ht)]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ (s \ t).ncard + t.ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· to_encard_tac
rw [ht.cast_ncard_eq, hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq]
apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem le_ncard_diff (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
t.ncard - s.ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr (by rw [add_comm]; apply ncard_le_ncard_diff_add_ncard _ _ hs)
theorem ncard_diff_add_ncard (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ t).ncard + t.ncard = (s ∪ t).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left hs.diff ht, diff_union_self]
theorem diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, diff_eq_empty]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (ncard_le_ncard h' hs)
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_ncard_lt_ncard (h : s.ncard < t.ncard)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s :=
diff_nonempty_of_ncard_lt_ncard h hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard (s t : Set α)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s \ t).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_right)
(hs.inter_of_left _) hs.diff, union_comm, diff_union_inter]
theorem ncard_eq_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_eq_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard = t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard = (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_right_inj]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_le_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard ≤ (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_lt_ncard_iff_ncard_diff_lt_ncard_diff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard < t.ncard ↔ (s \ t).ncard < (t \ s).ncard := by
rw [← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard s t hs, ← ncard_inter_add_ncard_diff_eq_ncard t s ht,
inter_comm, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem ncard_add_ncard_compl (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(hsc : sᶜ.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard + sᶜ.ncard = Nat.card α := by
rw [← ncard_univ, ← ncard_union_eq (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ s) hs hsc, union_compl_self]
theorem eq_univ_iff_ncard [Finite α] (s : Set α) :
s = univ ↔ ncard s = Nat.card α := by
rw [← compl_empty_iff, ← ncard_eq_zero, ← ncard_add_ncard_compl s, left_eq_add]
lemma even_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Even sᶜ.ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
simp [compl_eq_univ_diff, ncard_diff (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ),
Nat.even_sub (ncard_le_ncard (subset_univ _ : s ⊆ Set.univ)),
(ncard_univ _).symm ▸ heven]
lemma odd_ncard_compl_iff [Finite α] (heven : Even (Nat.card α)) (s : Set α) :
Odd sᶜ.ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, even_ncard_compl_iff heven, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end Lattice
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq {n : ℕ} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : s.ncard ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ t.ncard) :
| ∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ u.ncard = n := by
obtain ht | ht := t.infinite_or_finite
· rw [ht.ncard, Nat.le_zero, ← ht.ncard] at hnt
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 954 | 956 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
exact hp rfl
theorem Monic.map [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : Monic p) : Monic (p.map f) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
have : f p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [show _ = _ from hp, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, coeff_map]
suffices p.coeff (p.map f).natDegree = 1 by simp [this]
rwa [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f this)]
theorem monic_C_mul_of_mul_leadingCoeff_eq_one {b : R} (hp : b * p.leadingCoeff = 1) :
Monic (C b * p) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one {b : R} (hp : p.leadingCoeff * b = 1) :
Monic (p * C b) := by
unfold Monic
nontriviality
rw [leadingCoeff_mul' _] <;> simp [leadingCoeff_C b, hp]
theorem monic_of_degree_le (n : ℕ) (H1 : degree p ≤ n) (H2 : coeff p n = 1) : Monic p :=
Decidable.byCases
(fun H : degree p < n => eq_of_zero_eq_one (H2 ▸ (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H).symm) _ _)
fun H : ¬degree p < n => by
rwa [Monic, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, (lt_or_eq_of_le H1).resolve_left H]
theorem monic_X_pow_add {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n + p) :=
monic_of_degree_le n
(le_trans (degree_add_le _ _) (max_le (degree_X_pow_le _) (le_of_lt H)))
(by rw [coeff_add, coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt H, add_zero])
variable (a) in
theorem monic_X_pow_add_C {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (X ^ n + C a).Monic :=
monic_X_pow_add <| (lt_of_le_of_lt degree_C_le
(by simp only [Nat.cast_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, h, not_false_eq_true]))
theorem monic_X_add_C (x : R) : Monic (X + C x) :=
pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ monic_X_pow_add_C x one_ne_zero
theorem Monic.mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) : Monic (p * q) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : (0 : R) = 1 then
haveI := subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h0
Subsingleton.elim _ _
else by
have : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, Ne.symm h0]
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul' this, Monic.def.1 hp, Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
theorem Monic.pow (hp : Monic p) : ∀ n : ℕ, Monic (p ^ n)
| 0 => monic_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact (Monic.pow hp n).mul hp
theorem Monic.add_of_left (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, add_comm, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.add_of_right (hq : Monic q) (hpq : degree p < degree q) : Monic (p + q) := by
rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_add_of_degree_lt hpq]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_left (hp : p.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : q.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hp]
theorem Monic.of_mul_monic_right (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : (p * q).Monic) : p.Monic := by
contrapose! hpq
rw [Monic.def] at hpq ⊢
rwa [leadingCoeff_mul_monic hq]
namespace Monic
lemma comp (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (h : q.natDegree ≠ 0) : (p.comp q).Monic := by
nontriviality R
have : (p.comp q).natDegree = p.natDegree * q.natDegree :=
natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero <| by simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
rw [Monic.def, Polynomial.leadingCoeff, this, coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree h, hp.leadingCoeff,
hq.leadingCoeff, one_pow, mul_one]
lemma comp_X_add_C (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X + C r)).Monic := by
nontriviality R
refine hp.comp (monic_X_add_C _) fun ha ↦ ?_
rw [natDegree_X_add_C] at ha
exact one_ne_zero ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
swap
· rw [h]
exact natDegree_one
have : p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← Polynomial.degree_le_zero_iff]
rwa [Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero] at h
rw [this]
rw [← h, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, Monic.def.1 hp, C_1]
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_zero_iff_eq_one (hp : p.Monic) : p.degree ≤ 0 ↔ p = 1 := by
rw [← hp.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
nontriviality R
apply natDegree_mul'
simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff]
theorem degree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).degree = (q * p).degree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [degree_mul', hp.degree_mul]
· exact add_comm _ _
· rwa [hp.leadingCoeff, one_mul, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
nonrec theorem natDegree_mul' (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_mul']
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem natDegree_mul_comm (hp : p.Monic) (q : R[X]) : (p * q).natDegree = (q * p).natDegree := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp [h]
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' h, Polynomial.natDegree_mul', add_comm]
simpa [hp.leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
theorem not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
¬p ∣ q := by
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [hp.natDegree_mul' <| right_ne_zero_of_mul h0] at hl
exact hl.not_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem not_dvd_of_degree_lt (hp : Monic p) (h0 : q ≠ 0) (hl : degree q < degree p) : ¬p ∣ q :=
Monic.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hp h0 <| natDegree_lt_natDegree h0 hl
theorem nextCoeff_mul (hp : Monic p) (hq : Monic q) :
nextCoeff (p * q) = nextCoeff p + nextCoeff q := by
nontriviality
simp only [← coeff_one_reverse]
rw [reverse_mul] <;> simp [hp.leadingCoeff, hq.leadingCoeff, mul_coeff_one, add_comm]
theorem nextCoeff_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).nextCoeff = n • p.nextCoeff := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, zero_smul, ← map_one (f := C), nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).nextCoeff_mul hp, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem eq_one_of_map_eq_one {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) (hp : p.Monic)
(map_eq : p.map f = 1) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
have hdeg : p.degree = 0 := by
rw [← degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f _, map_eq, degree_one]
· rw [hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
have hndeg : p.natDegree = 0 :=
WithBot.coe_eq_coe.mp ((degree_eq_natDegree hp.ne_zero).symm.trans hdeg)
convert eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero hdeg
rw [← hndeg, ← Polynomial.leadingCoeff, hp.leadingCoeff, C.map_one]
theorem natDegree_pow (hp : p.Monic) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).natDegree = n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, (hp.pow n).natDegree_mul hp, hn, Nat.succ_mul, add_comm]
end Monic
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow_X_add_C [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) (r : R) : ((X + C r) ^ n).natDegree = n := by
rw [(monic_X_add_C r).natDegree_pow, natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one]
theorem Monic.eq_one_of_isUnit (hm : Monic p) (hpu : IsUnit p) : p = 1 := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨q, h⟩ := hpu.exists_right_inv
have := hm.natDegree_mul' (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h)
rw [h, natDegree_one, eq_comm, add_eq_zero] at this
exact hm.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one.mp this.1
theorem Monic.isUnit_iff (hm : p.Monic) : IsUnit p ↔ p = 1 :=
⟨hm.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h => h.symm ▸ isUnit_one⟩
theorem eq_of_monic_of_associated (hp : p.Monic) (hq : q.Monic) (hpq : Associated p q) : p = q := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := hpq
rw [(hp.of_mul_monic_left hq).eq_one_of_isUnit u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_multiset_prod_of_monic (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (ht : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (t.map f).prod := by
revert ht
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_; · simp
intro a t ih ht
rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons]
exact (ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)).mul (ih fun _ hi => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi))
theorem monic_prod_of_monic (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic s.1 f hs
theorem monic_finprod_of_monic (α : Type*) (f : α → R[X])
(hf : ∀ i ∈ Function.mulSupport f, Monic (f i)) :
Monic (finprod f) := by
classical
rw [finprod_def]
split_ifs
· exact monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a ha => hf a ((Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _).mp ha)
· exact monic_one
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod (t : Multiset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (t.map f).prod = (t.map fun i => nextCoeff (f i)).sum := by
revert h
refine Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t ih ht => ?_
· simp only [Multiset.not_mem_zero, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false, Multiset.map_zero,
Multiset.prod_zero, Multiset.sum_zero, not_false_iff, forall_true_iff]
rw [← C_1]
rw [nextCoeff_C_eq_zero]
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.sum_cons,
Monic.nextCoeff_mul, ih]
exacts [fun i hi => ht i (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hi), ht a (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _),
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun b bs => ht _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem bs)]
theorem Monic.nextCoeff_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Monic (f i)) :
nextCoeff (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, nextCoeff (f i) :=
Monic.nextCoeff_multiset_prod s.1 f h
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
lemma irreducible_of_monic (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h f g hf hg hp => (h.2 hp.symm).imp hf.eq_one_of_isUnit hg.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h =>
⟨hp1 ∘ hp.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun f g hfg =>
(h (g * C f.leadingCoeff) (f * C g.leadingCoeff) ?_ ?_ ?_).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f _)
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one g _)⟩⟩
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, mul_comm, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← C_mul, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, mul_one,
mul_comm, ← hfg]
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree (hp : p.Monic) :
Irreducible p ↔
p ≠ 1 ∧ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f.natDegree = 0 ∨ g.natDegree = 0 := by
by_cases hp1 : p = 1; · simp [hp1]
rw [irreducible_of_monic hp hp1, and_iff_right hp1]
refine forall₄_congr fun a b ha hb => ?_
rw [ha.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, hb.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree' (hp : p.Monic) : Irreducible p ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧
∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → g.natDegree ∉ Ioc 0 (p.natDegree / 2) := by
simp_rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree, mem_Ioc, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le zero_lt_two, mul_two]
apply and_congr_right'
constructor <;> intro h f g hf hg he <;> subst he
· rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact fun ha => (h f g hf hg rfl).elim (ha.1.trans_le ha.2).ne' ha.1.ne'
· simp_rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
contrapose! h
obtain hl | hl := le_total f.natDegree g.natDegree
· exact ⟨g, f, hg, hf, mul_comm g f, h.1, add_le_add_left hl _⟩
· exact ⟨f, g, hf, hg, rfl, h.2, add_le_add_right hl _⟩
/-- Alternate phrasing of `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree'` where we only have to check
one divisor at a time. -/
lemma Monic.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, Monic q → natDegree q ∈ Finset.Ioc 0 (natDegree p / 2) → ¬ q ∣ p := by
rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right hp1]
constructor
· rintro h g hg hdg ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact h f g (hg.of_mul_monic_left hp) hg (mul_comm f g) hdg
· rintro h f g - hg rfl hdg
exact h g hg hdg (dvd_mul_left g f)
lemma Monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 2) :
¬Irreducible p ↔ ∃ c₁ c₂, p.coeff 0 = c₁ * c₂ ∧ p.coeff 1 = c₁ + c₂ := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [natDegree_of_subsingleton] at hnd
rw [hm.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right, hnd]
· push_neg
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl, hdb⟩
simp only [zero_lt_two, Nat.div_self, Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, zero_add, mem_singleton] at hdb
have hda := hnd
rw [ha.natDegree_mul hb, hdb] at hda
use a.coeff 0, b.coeff 0, mul_coeff_zero a b
simpa only [nextCoeff, hnd, add_right_cancel hda, hdb] using ha.nextCoeff_mul hb
· rintro ⟨c₁, c₂, hmul, hadd⟩
refine
⟨X + C c₁, X + C c₂, monic_X_add_C _, monic_X_add_C _, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, hnd, Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Finset.sum_range_one, ← hnd, hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, hmul, hadd, C_mul, C_add, C_1]
ring
· rw [mem_Ioc, natDegree_X_add_C _]
simp
· rintro rfl
simp [natDegree_one] at hnd
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem Monic.natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).natDegree = P.natDegree := by
refine le_antisymm natDegree_map_le (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_)
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem Monic.degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {P : R[X]} (hmo : P.Monic) (f : R →+* S) :
(P.map f).degree = P.degree := by
by_cases hP : P = 0
· simp [hP]
· refine le_antisymm degree_map_le ?_
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hP]
refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
rw [coeff_map, Monic.coeff_natDegree hmo, RingHom.map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
section Injective
open Function
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
theorem degree_map_eq_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) : degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [← f.map_zero]; exact mt hf.eq_iff.1 (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h))
theorem natDegree_map_eq_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map_eq_of_injective hf p)
theorem leadingCoeff_map' (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
unfold leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
theorem nextCoeff_map (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) : (p.map f).nextCoeff = f p.nextCoeff := by
unfold nextCoeff
rw [natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_injective (hf : Injective f) (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
delta leadingCoeff
rw [coeff_map f, natDegree_map_eq_of_injective hf p]
theorem monic_of_injective (hf : Injective f) {p : R[X]} (hp : (p.map f).Monic) : p.Monic := by
apply hf
rw [← leadingCoeff_of_injective hf, hp.leadingCoeff, f.map_one]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.monic_map_iff (hf : Injective f) {p : R[X]} :
p.Monic ↔ (p.map f).Monic :=
⟨Monic.map _, Polynomial.monic_of_injective hf⟩
end Injective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p : R[X]}
theorem monic_X_sub_C (x : R) : Monic (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using monic_X_add_C (-x)
theorem monic_X_pow_sub {n : ℕ} (H : degree p < n) : Monic (X ^ n - p) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add (show degree (-p) < n by rwa [← degree_neg p] at H)
/-- `X ^ n - a` is monic. -/
theorem monic_X_pow_sub_C {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R) {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n - C a).Monic := by
simpa only [map_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using monic_X_pow_add_C (-a) h
theorem not_isUnit_X_pow_sub_one (R : Type*) [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
¬IsUnit (X ^ n - 1 : R[X]) := by
intro h
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp at h
apply hn
rw [← @natDegree_one R, ← (monic_X_pow_sub_C _ hn).eq_one_of_isUnit h, natDegree_X_pow_sub_C]
lemma Monic.comp_X_sub_C {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (r : R) : (p.comp (X - C r)).Monic := by
simpa using hp.comp_X_add_C (-r)
theorem Monic.sub_of_left {p q : R[X]} (hp : Monic p) (hpq : degree q < degree p) :
Monic (p - q) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply hp.add_of_left
rwa [degree_neg]
theorem Monic.sub_of_right {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.leadingCoeff = -1) (hpq : degree p < degree q) :
Monic (p - q) := by
have : (-q).coeff (-q).natDegree = 1 := by
rw [natDegree_neg, coeff_neg, show q.coeff q.natDegree = -1 from hq, neg_neg]
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
apply Monic.add_of_right this
rwa [degree_neg]
end Ring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem not_monic_zero : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) :=
not_monic_zero_iff.mp zero_ne_one
end NonzeroSemiring
|
section NotZeroDivisor
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 478 | 479 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
| end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 582 | 590 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.IntUnitsPower
/-!
# Integer powers of (-1)
This file defines the map `negOnePow : ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`.
The definition of `negOnePow` and some lemmas first appeared in contributions by
Johan Commelin to the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace Int
/-- The map `ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`. -/
def negOnePow (n : ℤ) : ℤˣ := (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n
lemma negOnePow_def (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n := rfl
lemma negOnePow_add (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(n₁ + n₂).negOnePow = n₁.negOnePow * n₂.negOnePow :=
zpow_add _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_zero : negOnePow 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_one : negOnePow 1 = -1 := rfl
lemma negOnePow_succ (n : ℤ) : (n + 1).negOnePow = - n.negOnePow := by
rw [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
lemma negOnePow_even (n : ℤ) (hn : Even n) : n.negOnePow = 1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [negOnePow_add, units_mul_self]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul (n : ℤ) : (2 * n).negOnePow = 1 :=
negOnePow_even _ ⟨n, two_mul n⟩
lemma negOnePow_odd (n : ℤ) (hn : Odd n) : n.negOnePow = -1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
simp only [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_two_mul, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul_add_one (n : ℤ) : (2 * n + 1).negOnePow = -1 :=
negOnePow_odd _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
lemma negOnePow_eq_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = 1 ↔ Even n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_odd_iff_even]
intro h'
simp only [negOnePow_odd _ h'] at h
contradiction
· exact negOnePow_even n
lemma negOnePow_eq_neg_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = -1 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_even_iff_odd]
intro h'
rw [negOnePow_even _ h'] at h
contradiction
· exact negOnePow_odd n
@[simp]
theorem abs_negOnePow (n : ℤ) : |(n.negOnePow : ℤ)| = 1 := by
rw [abs_eq_natAbs, Int.units_natAbs, Nat.cast_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_neg (n : ℤ) : (-n).negOnePow = n.negOnePow := by
dsimp [negOnePow]
simp only [zpow_neg, ← inv_zpow, inv_neg, inv_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_abs (n : ℤ) : |n|.negOnePow = n.negOnePow := by
obtain h|h := abs_choice n <;> simp only [h, negOnePow_neg]
lemma negOnePow_sub (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(n₁ - n₂).negOnePow = n₁.negOnePow * n₂.negOnePow := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, negOnePow_add, negOnePow_neg]
lemma negOnePow_eq_iff (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
n₁.negOnePow = n₂.negOnePow ↔ Even (n₁ - n₂) := by
by_cases h₂ : Even n₂
· rw [negOnePow_even _ h₂, Int.even_sub, negOnePow_eq_one_iff]
tauto
· rw [Int.not_even_iff_odd] at h₂
rw [negOnePow_odd _ h₂, Int.even_sub, negOnePow_eq_neg_one_iff,
← Int.not_odd_iff_even, ← Int.not_odd_iff_even]
tauto
| @[simp]
lemma negOnePow_mul_self (n : ℤ) : (n * n).negOnePow = n.negOnePow := by
simpa [mul_sub, negOnePow_eq_iff] using n.even_mul_pred_self
lemma cast_negOnePow_natCast (R : Type*) [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : negOnePow n = (-1 : R) ^ n := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ := Nat.even_or_odd' n <;> simp [pow_succ, pow_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/NegOnePow.lean | 104 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Lemmas
/-!
# Euclidean distance on a finite dimensional space
When we define a smooth bump function on a normed space, it is useful to have a smooth distance on
the space. Since the default distance is not guaranteed to be smooth, we define `toEuclidean` to be
an equivalence between a finite dimensional topological vector space and the standard Euclidean
space of the same dimension.
Then we define `Euclidean.dist x y = dist (toEuclidean x) (toEuclidean y)` and
provide some definitions (`Euclidean.ball`, `Euclidean.closedBall`) and simple lemmas about this
distance. This way we hide the usage of `toEuclidean` behind an API.
-/
open scoped Topology
open Set
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [T2Space E]
[Module ℝ E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
noncomputable section
open Module
/-- If `E` is a finite dimensional space over `ℝ`, then `toEuclidean` is a continuous `ℝ`-linear
equivalence between `E` and the Euclidean space of the same dimension. -/
def toEuclidean : E ≃L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin <| finrank ℝ E) :=
ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq finrank_euclideanSpace_fin.symm
namespace Euclidean
/-- If `x` and `y` are two points in a finite dimensional space over `ℝ`, then `Euclidean.dist x y`
is the distance between these points in the metric defined by some inner product space structure on
`E`. -/
nonrec def dist (x y : E) : ℝ :=
dist (toEuclidean x) (toEuclidean y)
/-- Closed ball w.r.t. the euclidean distance. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) : Set E :=
{y | dist y x ≤ r}
/-- Open ball w.r.t. the euclidean distance. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) : Set E :=
{y | dist y x < r}
theorem ball_eq_preimage (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball x r = toEuclidean ⁻¹' Metric.ball (toEuclidean x) r :=
rfl
theorem closedBall_eq_preimage (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r = toEuclidean ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (toEuclidean x) r :=
rfl
theorem ball_subset_closedBall {x : E} {r : ℝ} : ball x r ⊆ closedBall x r := fun _ (hy : _ < r) =>
le_of_lt hy
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball {x : E} {r : ℝ} : IsOpen (ball x r) :=
Metric.isOpen_ball.preimage toEuclidean.continuous
theorem mem_ball_self {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball x r :=
Metric.mem_ball_self hr
theorem closedBall_eq_image (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall x r = toEuclidean.symm '' Metric.closedBall (toEuclidean x) r := by
rw [toEuclidean.image_symm_eq_preimage, closedBall_eq_preimage]
nonrec theorem isCompact_closedBall {x : E} {r : ℝ} : IsCompact (closedBall x r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_image]
exact (isCompact_closedBall _ _).image toEuclidean.symm.continuous
theorem isClosed_closedBall {x : E} {r : ℝ} : IsClosed (closedBall x r) :=
isCompact_closedBall.isClosed
nonrec theorem closure_ball (x : E) {r : ℝ} (h : r ≠ 0) : closure (ball x r) = closedBall x r := by
rw [ball_eq_preimage, ← toEuclidean.preimage_closure, closure_ball (toEuclidean x) h,
closedBall_eq_preimage]
nonrec theorem exists_pos_lt_subset_ball {R : ℝ} {s : Set E} {x : E} (hR : 0 < R) (hs : IsClosed s)
(h : s ⊆ ball x R) : ∃ r ∈ Ioo 0 R, s ⊆ ball x r := by
rw [ball_eq_preimage, ← image_subset_iff] at h
rcases exists_pos_lt_subset_ball hR (toEuclidean.isClosed_image.2 hs) h with ⟨r, hr, hsr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr, image_subset_iff.1 hsr⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall {x : E} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r) (closedBall x) := by
rw [toEuclidean.toHomeomorph.nhds_eq_comap x]
exact Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.comap _
|
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall x r ∈ 𝓝 x :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_of_mem hr
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/EuclideanDist.lean | 96 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jack McKoen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Colimits
/-!
# Binary (co)products of type-valued functors
Defines an explicit construction of binary products and coproducts of type-valued functors.
Also defines isomorphisms to the categorical product and coproduct, respectively.
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory.FunctorToTypes
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F G : C ⥤ Type w)
section prod
/-- `prod F G` is the explicit binary product of type-valued functors `F` and `G`. -/
def prod : C ⥤ Type w where
obj a := F.obj a × G.obj a
map f a := (F.map f a.1, G.map f a.2)
variable {F G}
/-- The first projection of `prod F G`, onto `F`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.fst : prod F G ⟶ F where
app _ a := a.1
/-- The second projection of `prod F G`, onto `G`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.snd : prod F G ⟶ G where
app _ a := a.2
/-- Given natural transformations `F ⟶ F₁` and `F ⟶ F₂`, construct
a natural transformation `F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.lift {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
F ⟶ prod F₁ F₂ where
app x y := ⟨τ₁.app x y, τ₂.app x y⟩
naturality _ _ _ := by
ext a
simp only [types_comp_apply, FunctorToTypes.naturality]
aesop
@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_fst {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.fst = τ₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma prod.lift_snd {F₁ F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (τ₁ : F ⟶ F₁) (τ₂ : F ⟶ F₂) :
prod.lift τ₁ τ₂ ≫ prod.snd = τ₂ := rfl
variable (F G)
/-- The binary fan whose point is `prod F G`. -/
@[simps!]
def binaryProductCone : BinaryFan F G :=
BinaryFan.mk prod.fst prod.snd
/-- `prod F G` is a limit cone. -/
@[simps]
def binaryProductLimit : IsLimit (binaryProductCone F G) where
lift (s : BinaryFan F G) := prod.lift s.fst s.snd
fac _ := fun ⟨j⟩ ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn j rfl rfl
uniq _ _ h := by
simp only [← h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩, ← h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩]
congr
/-- `prod F G` is a binary product for `F` and `G`. -/
def binaryProductLimitCone : Limits.LimitCone (pair F G) :=
⟨_, binaryProductLimit F G⟩
/-- The categorical binary product of type-valued functors is `prod F G`. -/
noncomputable def binaryProductIso : F ⨯ G ≅ prod F G :=
limit.isoLimitCone (binaryProductLimitCone F G)
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_fst :
(binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.fst = Limits.prod.fst := rfl
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_hom_comp_snd :
(binaryProductIso F G).hom ≫ prod.snd = Limits.prod.snd := rfl
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst :
(binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.fst = prod.fst := by
simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
(Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.1 :=
congr_fun (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst F G) a) z
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd :
(binaryProductIso F G).inv ≫ Limits.prod.snd = prod.snd := by
simp [binaryProductIso, binaryProductLimitCone]
@[simp]
lemma binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd_apply (a : C) (z : (prod F G).obj a) :
(Limits.prod.snd (X := F)).app a ((binaryProductIso F G).inv.app a z) = z.2 :=
congr_fun (congr_app (binaryProductIso_inv_comp_snd F G) a) z
variable {F G}
/-- Construct an element of `(F ⨯ G).obj a` from an element of `F.obj a` and
an element of `G.obj a`. -/
noncomputable
def prodMk {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) : (F ⨯ G).obj a :=
((binaryProductIso F G).inv).app a ⟨x, y⟩
@[simp]
lemma prodMk_fst {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
(Limits.prod.fst (X := F)).app a (prodMk x y) = x := by
| simp only [prodMk, binaryProductIso_inv_comp_fst_apply]
@[simp]
lemma prodMk_snd {a : C} (x : F.obj a) (y : G.obj a) :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/FunctorToTypes.lean | 130 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SFinite ν] [SFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prodMk_right
apply measurable_const.prodMk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
| have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 151 | 156 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.