Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The short complexes attached to homological complexes
In this file, we define a functor
`shortComplexFunctor C c i : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C`.
By definition, the image of a homological complex `K` by this functor
is the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`.
The homology `K.homology i` of a homological complex `K` in degree `i` is defined as
the homology of the short complex `(shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K`, which can be
abbreviated as `K.sc i`.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexFunctor' (i j k : ι) : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj K := ShortComplex.mk (K.d i j) (K.d j k) (K.d_comp_d i j k)
map f :=
{ τ₁ := f.f i
τ₂ := f.f j
τ₃ := f.f k }
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def shortComplexFunctor (i : ι) :=
shortComplexFunctor' C c (c.prev i) i (c.next i)
/-- The natural isomorphism `shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k`
when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def natIsoSc' (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => ShortComplex.isoMk (K.XIsoOfEq hi) (Iso.refl _) (K.XIsoOfEq hk)
(by simp) (by simp)) (by aesop_cat)
variable {C c}
variable (K L M : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M) (i j k : ι)
/-- The short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
abbrev sc' := (shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).obj K
/-- The short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
noncomputable abbrev sc := (shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoSc' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k := (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk).app K
/-- A homological complex `K` has homology in degree `i` if the associated
short complex `K.sc i` has. -/
abbrev HasHomology := (K.sc i).HasHomology
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The homology in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homology := (K.sc i).homology
/-- The cycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def cycles := (K.sc i).cycles
/-- The inclusion of the cycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : K.cycles i ⟶ K.X i := (K.sc i).iCycles
/-- The homology class map from cycles to the homology of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homologyπ : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i := (K.sc i).homologyπ
variable {i}
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def liftCycles {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
(K.sc i).liftCycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev liftCycles' {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel i j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
K.liftCycles k j (c.next_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_i {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ K.iCycles i = k := by
dsimp [liftCycles, iCycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def toCycles [K.HasHomology j] :
K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
K.liftCycles (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_d : K.iCycles i ≫ K.d i j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
exact (K.sc i).iCycles_g
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, comp_zero]
/-- `K.cycles i` is the kernel of `K.d i j` when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIsKernel (hj : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.iCycles i) (K.iCycles_d i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hj
exact (K.sc i).cyclesIsKernel
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.d i j :=
liftCycles_i _ _ _ _ _
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
instance : Mono (K.iCycles i) := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi (K.homologyπ i) := by
dsimp only [homologyπ]
infer_instance
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_toCycles [K.HasHomology k] :
K.d i j ≫ K.toCycles j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles k), assoc, toCycles_i, d_comp_d, zero_comp]
variable {i j} in
lemma toCycles_eq_zero [K.HasHomology j] (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.toCycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), toCycles_i, zero_comp, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
@[reassoc]
lemma comp_liftCycles {A' A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (α : A' ⟶ A) :
α ≫ K.liftCycles k j hj hk = K.liftCycles (α ≫ k) j hj (by rw [assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), assoc, liftCycles_i]
@[reassoc]
lemma liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι)
(hj : c.next i = j) {i' : ι} (x : A ⟶ K.X i') (hx : k = x ≫ K.d i' i) :
K.liftCycles k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) ≫ K.homologyπ i = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i' i
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : liftCycles K k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, comp_zero] at hx
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), zero_comp, liftCycles_i, hx]
rw [this, zero_comp]
end
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_comp_homologyπ [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.homologyπ j = 0 :=
K.liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology j` is the cokernel of `K.toCycles i j : K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j`
when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.homologyπ j) (K.toCycles_comp_homologyπ i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc j).homologyIsCokernel
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The opcycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def opcycles := (K.sc i).opcycles
/-- The projection to the opcycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : K.X i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).pOpcycles
/-- The inclusion map of the homology of a homological complex into its opcycles. -/
noncomputable def homologyι : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).homologyι
variable {i}
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
(K.sc i).descOpcycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev descOpcycles' {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel j i)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
K.descOpcycles k j (c.prev_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj hk = k := by
dsimp [descOpcycles, pOpcycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles :
K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j :=
K.descOpcycles (K.d i j) (c.prev i) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_pOpcycles [K.HasHomology j] : K.d i j ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' hij
exact (K.sc j).f_pOpcycles
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, zero_comp]
/-- `K.opcycles j` is the cokernel of `K.d i j` when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.pOpcycles j) (K.d_pOpcycles i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact (K.sc j).opcyclesIsCokernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = K.d i j :=
p_descOpcycles _ _ _ _ _
instance : Epi (K.pOpcycles i) := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono (K.homologyι i) := by
dsimp only [homologyι]
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_d :
K.fromOpcycles i j ≫ K.d j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles_assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
variable {i j} in
lemma fromOpcycles_eq_zero (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles, comp_zero, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
@[reassoc]
lemma descOpcycles_comp {A A' : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) (α : A ⟶ A') :
K.descOpcycles k j hj hk ≫ α = K.descOpcycles (k ≫ α) j hj
(by rw [reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_descOpcycles_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι)
(hj : c.prev i = j) {i' : ι} (x : K.X i' ⟶ A) (hx : k = K.d i i' ≫ x) :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i i'
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, zero_comp] at hx
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), comp_zero, p_descOpcycles, hx]
rw [this, comp_zero]
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 :=
K.homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) _ rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology i` is the kernel of `K.fromOpcycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j`
when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsKernel (hi : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.homologyι i) (K.homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc i).homologyIsKernel
variable {K L M}
variable [L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
/-- The map `K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def homologyMap : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.iCycles i = K.iCycles i ≫ φ.f i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_i _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : K.pOpcycles i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i = φ.f i ≫ L.pOpcycles i :=
ShortComplex.p_opcyclesMap _
instance [Mono (φ.f i)] : Mono (cyclesMap φ i) := mono_of_mono_fac (cyclesMap_i φ i)
instance [Epi (φ.f i)] : Epi (opcyclesMap φ i) := epi_of_epi_fac (p_opcyclesMap φ i)
variable (K)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_id : homologyMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id : cyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id : opcyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_id _
variable {K}
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyMap_comp : homologyMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = homologyMap φ i ≫ homologyMap ψ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.homologyMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp : cyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ cyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [cyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.cyclesMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp : opcyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = opcyclesMap φ i ≫ opcyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [opcyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_comp]
variable (K L)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_zero : homologyMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero : cyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero : opcyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_zero _ _
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_naturality :
K.homologyπ i ≫ homologyMap φ i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.homologyπ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyπ_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_naturality :
homologyMap φ i ≫ L.homologyι i = K.homologyι i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyι_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homology_π_ι :
K.homologyπ i ≫ K.homologyι i = K.iCycles i ≫ K.pOpcycles i :=
(K.sc i).homology_π_ι
variable {i}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : L.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : L.d j i ≫ k = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
opcyclesMap φ i ≫ L.descOpcycles k j hj hk = K.descOpcycles (φ.f i ≫ k) j hj
(by rw [← φ.comm_assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_opcyclesMap_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_comp_cyclesMap {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ cyclesMap φ i = L.liftCycles (k ≫ φ.f i) j hj
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm, reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (L.iCycles i), assoc, cyclesMap_i, liftCycles_i_assoc, liftCycles_i]
section
variable (C c i)
attribute [local simp] homologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- The `i`th homology functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.homology i
map f := homologyMap f i
/-- The homology functor to graded objects. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def gradedHomologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ GradedObject ι C where
obj K i := K.homology i
map f i := homologyMap f i
/-- The `i`th cycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.cycles i
map f := cyclesMap f i
/-- The `i`th opcycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.opcycles i
map f := opcyclesMap f i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyπ i : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyπ [CategoryWithHomology C] :
cyclesFunctor C c i ⟶ homologyFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyπ i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyι i : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyι [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyι i
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ (K.sc i).homology`
for all homological complexes `K`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ≅
shortComplexFunctor C c i ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
Iso.refl _
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology j ≅ (K.sc' i j k).homology`
for all homological complexes `K` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso' [CategoryWithHomology C]
(hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
homologyFunctor C c j ≅
shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
homologyFunctorIso C c j ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) _
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (homologyFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (opcyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (cyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
end
end
section
variable (hj : c.next i = j) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology i]
include hj h
lemma isIso_iCycles : IsIso (K.iCycles i) := by
subst hj
exact ShortComplex.isIso_iCycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles i ≅ K.X i` when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def iCyclesIso : K.cycles i ≅ K.X i :=
have := K.isIso_iCycles i j hj h
asIso (K.iCycles i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.iCycles i ≫ (K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv ≫ K.iCycles i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyι : IsIso (K.homologyι i) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyι _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i`
when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyι : K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i :=
have := K.isIso_homologyι i j hj h
asIso (K.homologyι i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyι i ≫ (K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv ≫ K.homologyι i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (hi : c.prev j = i) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology j]
include hi h
lemma isIso_pOpcycles : IsIso (K.pOpcycles j) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact ShortComplex.isIso_pOpcycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.X j ≅ K.opCycles j` when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def pOpcyclesIso : K.X j ≅ K.opcycles j :=
have := K.isIso_pOpcycles i j hi h
asIso (K.pOpcycles j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.pOpcycles j ≫ (K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyπ : IsIso (K.homologyπ j) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyπ _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j`
when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyπ : K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j :=
have := K.isIso_homologyπ i j hi h
asIso (K.homologyπ j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyπ j ≫ (K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv ≫ K.homologyπ j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable {K L}
lemma epi_homologyMap_of_epi_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [Epi (φ.f i)] (hi : ∀ j, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Epi (homologyMap φ i) :=
((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).2
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms.infer_property (opcyclesMap φ i))
lemma mono_homologyMap_of_mono_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (j : ι)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [Mono (φ.f j)] (hj : ∀ i, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Mono (homologyMap φ j) :=
((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).1
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms.infer_property (cyclesMap φ j))
end
/-- A homological complex `K` is exact at `i` if the short complex `K.sc i` is exact. -/
def ExactAt := (K.sc i).Exact
lemma exactAt_iff :
K.ExactAt i ↔ (K.sc i).Exact := by rfl
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.of_iso (hK : K.ExactAt i) {L : HomologicalComplex C c} (e : K ≅ L) :
L.ExactAt i := by
rw [exactAt_iff] at hK ⊢
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapIso e) hK
lemma exactAt_iff' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.ExactAt j ↔ (K.sc' i j k).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_iso (K.isoSc' i j k hi hk)
lemma exactAt_iff_isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ IsZero (K.homology i) := by
dsimp [homology]
rw [exactAt_iff, ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] (h : K.ExactAt i) :
IsZero (K.homology i) := by
rwa [← exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
/-- A homological complex `K` is acyclic if it is exact at `i` for any `i`. -/
def Acyclic := ∀ i, K.ExactAt i
lemma acyclic_iff :
K.Acyclic ↔ ∀ i, K.ExactAt i := by rfl
lemma acyclic_of_isZero (hK : IsZero K) :
K.Acyclic := by
rw [acyclic_iff]
intro i
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂
exact (eval _ _ i).map_isZero hK
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(K L : ChainComplex C ℕ) (φ : K ⟶ L) [K.HasHomology 0]
instance isIso_homologyι₀ :
IsIso (K.homologyι 0) :=
K.isIso_homologyι 0 _ rfl (by simp)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.homology 0 ≅ K.opcycles 0` for a chain complex `K`
indexed by `ℕ`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoHomologyι₀ :
K.homology 0 ≅ K.opcycles 0 := K.isoHomologyι 0 _ rfl (by simp)
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι₀_inv_naturality [L.HasHomology 0] :
K.isoHomologyι₀.inv ≫ HomologicalComplex.homologyMap φ 0 =
HomologicalComplex.opcyclesMap φ 0 ≫ L.isoHomologyι₀.inv := by
simp only [assoc, ← cancel_mono (L.homologyι 0),
HomologicalComplex.homologyι_naturality, HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id_assoc,
HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(K L : CochainComplex C ℕ) (φ : K ⟶ L) [K.HasHomology 0]
instance isIso_homologyπ₀ :
IsIso (K.homologyπ 0) :=
K.isIso_homologyπ _ 0 rfl (by simp)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles 0 ≅ K.homology 0` for a cochain complex `K`
indexed by `ℕ`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoHomologyπ₀ :
K.cycles 0 ≅ K.homology 0 := K.isoHomologyπ _ 0 rfl (by simp)
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ₀_inv_naturality [L.HasHomology 0] :
HomologicalComplex.homologyMap φ 0 ≫ L.isoHomologyπ₀.inv =
K.isoHomologyπ₀.inv ≫ HomologicalComplex.cyclesMap φ 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.homologyπ 0), HomologicalComplex.homologyπ_naturality_assoc,
HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyπ_hom_inv_id, comp_id,
HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyπ_hom_inv_id_assoc]
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {C ι : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {c : ComplexShape ι}
{K L : HomologicalComplex C c} {f g : K ⟶ L}
variable (φ ψ : K ⟶ L) (i : ι) [K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i]
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_neg : homologyMap (-φ) i = -homologyMap φ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [← ShortComplex.homologyMap_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_add : homologyMap (φ + ψ) i = homologyMap φ i + homologyMap ψ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [← ShortComplex.homologyMap_add]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_sub : homologyMap (φ - ψ) i = homologyMap φ i - homologyMap ψ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [← ShortComplex.homologyMap_sub]
rfl
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (homologyFunctor C c i).Additive where
end HomologicalComplex
namespace CochainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Abelian C]
lemma isIso_liftCycles_iff (K : CochainComplex C ℕ) {X : C} (φ : X ⟶ K.X 0)
[K.HasHomology 0] (hφ : φ ≫ K.d 0 1 = 0) :
IsIso (K.liftCycles φ 1 (by simp) hφ) ↔
(ShortComplex.mk _ _ hφ).Exact ∧ Mono φ := by
suffices ∀ (i : ℕ) (hx : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).next 0 = i)
(hφ : φ ≫ K.d 0 i = 0), IsIso (K.liftCycles φ i hx hφ) ↔
(ShortComplex.mk _ _ hφ).Exact ∧ Mono φ from this 1 (by simp) hφ
rintro _ rfl hφ
let α : ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ X) (0 : X ⟶ X) (by simp) ⟶ K.sc 0 :=
{ τ₁ := 0
τ₂ := φ
τ₃ := 0 }
exact (ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_isIso_liftCycles α rfl rfl (by simp)).symm.trans
(ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_of_zeros α rfl rfl (by simp))
end CochainComplex
namespace ChainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Abelian C]
lemma isIso_descOpcycles_iff (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) {X : C} (φ : K.X 0 ⟶ X)
[K.HasHomology 0] (hφ : K.d 1 0 ≫ φ = 0) :
IsIso (K.descOpcycles φ 1 (by simp) hφ) ↔
(ShortComplex.mk _ _ hφ).Exact ∧ Epi φ := by
suffices ∀ (i : ℕ) (hx : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).prev 0 = i)
(hφ : K.d i 0 ≫ φ = 0), IsIso (K.descOpcycles φ i hx hφ) ↔
(ShortComplex.mk _ _ hφ).Exact ∧ Epi φ from this 1 (by simp) hφ
rintro _ rfl hφ
let α : K.sc 0 ⟶ ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ X) (0 : X ⟶ X) (by simp) :=
{ τ₁ := 0
τ₂ := φ
τ₃ := 0 }
exact (ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_isIso_descOpcycles α (by simp) rfl rfl).symm.trans
(ShortComplex.quasiIso_iff_of_zeros' α (by simp) rfl rfl)
end ChainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {ι : Type*} {c : ComplexShape ι}
(K : HomologicalComplex C c)
(i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k)
[K.HasHomology j] [(K.sc' i j k).HasHomology]
/-- The cycles of a homological complex in degree `j` can be computed
by specifying a choice of `c.prev j` and `c.next j`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIsoSc' : K.cycles j ≅ (K.sc' i j k).cycles :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMapIso (K.isoSc' i j k hi hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoSc'_hom_iCycles :
(K.cyclesIsoSc' i j k hi hk).hom ≫ (K.sc' i j k).iCycles = K.iCycles j := by
dsimp [cyclesIsoSc']
simp only [ShortComplex.cyclesMap_i, shortComplexFunctor_obj_X₂, shortComplexFunctor'_obj_X₂,
natIsoSc'_hom_app_τ₂, comp_id]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoSc'_inv_iCycles :
(K.cyclesIsoSc' i j k hi hk).inv ≫ K.iCycles j = (K.sc' i j k).iCycles := by
dsimp [cyclesIsoSc']
erw [ShortComplex.cyclesMap_i]
apply comp_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_cyclesIsoSc'_hom :
K.toCycles i j ≫ (K.cyclesIsoSc' i j k hi hk).hom = (K.sc' i j k).toCycles := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.sc' i j k).iCycles, assoc, cyclesIsoSc'_hom_iCycles,
toCycles_i, ShortComplex.toCycles_i, shortComplexFunctor'_obj_f]
/-- The homology of a homological complex in degree `j` can be computed
by specifying a choice of `c.prev j` and `c.next j`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoSc' : K.opcycles j ≅ (K.sc' i j k).opcycles :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMapIso (K.isoSc' i j k hi hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_opcyclesIsoSc'_inv :
(K.sc' i j k).pOpcycles ≫ (K.opcyclesIsoSc' i j k hi hk).inv = K.pOpcycles j := by
dsimp [opcyclesIsoSc']
| simp only [ShortComplex.p_opcyclesMap, shortComplexFunctor'_obj_X₂, shortComplexFunctor_obj_X₂,
natIsoSc'_inv_app_τ₂, id_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/HomologicalComplex.lean | 804 | 808 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Measurable parametric Stieltjes functions
We provide tools to build a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at
+∞ for all `a : α` from a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ`. These measurable parametric Stieltjes
functions are cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of transition kernels.
The reason for going through `ℚ` instead of defining directly a Stieltjes function is that since
`ℚ` is countable, building a measurable function is easier and we can obtain properties of the
form `∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ∀ (q : ℚ), ...` (for some measure `μ` on `α`) by proving the weaker
`∀ (q : ℚ), ∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ...`.
This construction will be possible if `f a : ℚ → ℝ` satisfies a package of properties for all `a`:
monotonicity, limits at +-∞ and a continuity property. We define `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` to state
that this is the case at `a` and define the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF f` that `f` is measurable
and `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` for all `a`.
The function `α → StieltjesFunction` obtained by extending `f` by continuity from the right is then
called `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
In applications, we will often only have `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost surely with respect to
some measure. In order to turn that almost everywhere property into an everywhere property we define
`toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) := fun a q ↦ if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a q else defaultRatCDF q`,
which satisfies the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f)`.
Finally, we define `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`, composition of `toRatCDF` and
`IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
## Main definitions
* `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`: turn a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into a measurable
function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
/-- A measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ gives a measurable
function `α → Measure ℝ` by taking `StieltjesFunction.measure` at each point. -/
lemma StieltjesFunction.measurable_measure {α : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → StieltjesFunction} (hf : ∀ q, Measurable fun a ↦ f a q)
(hf_bot : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0))
(hf_top : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)) :
Measurable fun a ↦ (f a).measure :=
have : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (f a).measure :=
fun a ↦ (f a).isProbabilityMeasure (hf_bot a) (hf_top a)
.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic ℝ) isPiSystem_Iic <| by
simp_rw [forall_mem_range, StieltjesFunction.measure_Iic (f _) (hf_bot _), sub_zero]
exact fun _ ↦ (hf _).ennreal_ofReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α : Type*}
section IsMeasurableRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
/-- `a : α` is a Stieltjes point for `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` if `f a` is monotone with limit 0 at -∞
and 1 at +∞ and satisfies a continuity property. -/
structure IsRatStieltjesPoint (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) : Prop where
mono : Monotone (f a)
tendsto_atTop_one : Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)
tendsto_atBot_zero : Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)
iInf_rat_gt_eq : ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun p : Unit × α ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
↔ IsRatStieltjesPoint f a := by
constructor <;>
exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one, h.tendsto_atBot_zero, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
lemma measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a} := by
have h1 : MeasurableSet {a | Monotone (f a)} := by
change MeasurableSet {a | ∀ q r (_ : q ≤ r), f a q ≤ f a r}
simp_rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_le hf.eval hf.eval
have h2 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h3 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h4 : MeasurableSet {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t} := by
rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_eq_fun (.iInf fun _ ↦ hf.eval) hf.eval
suffices {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a}
= ({a | Monotone (f a)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)}
∩ {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t}) by
rw [this]
exact (((h1.inter h2).inter h3).inter h4)
ext a
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· exact ⟨⟨⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one⟩, h.tendsto_atBot_zero⟩, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
· exact ⟨h.1.1.1, h.1.1.2, h.1.2, h.2⟩
lemma IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite {f g : α → ℚ → ℝ} {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(hf : p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (hg : ¬ p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint g a) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun a ↦ if p a then f a else g a) a where
mono := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).mono, (hg h).mono]
tendsto_atTop_one := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atTop_one, (hg h).tendsto_atTop_one]
tendsto_atBot_zero := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atBot_zero, (hg h).tendsto_atBot_zero]
iInf_rat_gt_eq := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).iInf_rat_gt_eq, (hg h).iInf_rat_gt_eq]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- A function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` is a (kernel) rational cumulative distribution function if it is
measurable in the first argument and if `f a` satisfies a list of properties for all `a : α`:
monotonicity between 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ and a form of continuity.
A function with these properties can be extended to a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
-/
structure IsMeasurableRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : Prop where
isRatStieltjesPoint : ∀ a, IsRatStieltjesPoint f a
measurable : Measurable f
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.nonneg {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
0 ≤ f a q :=
Monotone.le_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.le_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
f a q ≤ 1 :=
Monotone.ge_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atTop_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atBot_zero {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.iInf_rat_gt_eq {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α)
(q : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi q, f a r = f a q := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).iInf_rat_gt_eq q
end IsMeasurableRatCDF
section DefaultRatCDF
/-- A function with the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF`.
Used in a piecewise construction to convert a function which only satisfies the properties
defining `IsMeasurableRatCDF` on some set into a true `IsMeasurableRatCDF`. -/
def defaultRatCDF (q : ℚ) := if q < 0 then (0 : ℝ) else 1
lemma monotone_defaultRatCDF : Monotone defaultRatCDF := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
intro x y hxy
dsimp only
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one, absurd (hxy.trans_lt h_2) h_1, le_rfl]
lemma defaultRatCDF_nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ defaultRatCDF q := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
lemma defaultRatCDF_le_one (q : ℚ) : defaultRatCDF q ≤ 1 := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨0, fun q hq => (if_neg (not_lt.mpr hq)).symm⟩
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atBot (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atBot]
refine ⟨-1, fun q hq => (if_pos (hq.trans_lt ?_)).symm⟩
linarith
lemma iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF (t : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi t, defaultRatCDF r = defaultRatCDF t := by
simp only [defaultRatCDF]
have h_bdd : BddBelow (range fun r : ↥(Ioi t) ↦ ite ((r : ℚ) < 0) (0 : ℝ) 1) := by
refine ⟨0, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hx
dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
split_ifs with h
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨q, htq, hq_neg⟩ : ∃ q, t < q ∧ q < 0 := ⟨t / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨q, htq⟩).trans ?_
rw [if_pos]
rwa [Subtype.coe_mk]
· split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨t + 1, lt_add_one t⟩).trans ?_
split_ifs
exacts [zero_le_one, le_rfl]
· refine le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_
rw [if_neg]
rw [not_lt] at h ⊢
exact h.trans (mem_Ioi.mp x.prop).le
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun (_ : α) ↦ defaultRatCDF) a where
mono := monotone_defaultRatCDF
tendsto_atTop_one := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop
tendsto_atBot_zero := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot
iInf_rat_gt_eq := iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF_defaultRatCDF (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsMeasurableRatCDF (fun (_ : α) (q : ℚ) ↦ defaultRatCDF q) where
isRatStieltjesPoint := isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF
measurable := measurable_const
end DefaultRatCDF
section ToRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Turn a function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into another with the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a`
everywhere. At `a` that does not satisfy that property, `f a` is replaced by an arbitrary suitable
function.
Mainly useful when `f` satisfies the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost everywhere with
respect to some measure. -/
noncomputable
def toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : α → ℚ → ℝ := fun a ↦
if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a else defaultRatCDF
lemma toRatCDF_of_isRatStieltjesPoint {a : α} (h : IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (q : ℚ) :
toRatCDF f a q = f a q := by
rw [toRatCDF, if_pos h]
lemma toRatCDF_unit_prod (a : α) :
toRatCDF (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) ((), a) = toRatCDF f a := by
unfold toRatCDF
rw [isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
lemma measurable_toRatCDF (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable (toRatCDF f) :=
Measurable.ite (measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint hf) hf measurable_const
lemma isMeasurableRatCDF_toRatCDF (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f) where
isRatStieltjesPoint a := by
classical
exact IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite (IsRatStieltjesPoint f) id
(fun _ ↦ isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF a)
measurable := measurable_toRatCDF hf
end ToRatCDF
section IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction
/-- Auxiliary definition for `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`: turn `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into
a function `α → ℝ → ℝ` by assigning to `f a x` the infimum of `f a q` over `q : ℚ` with `x < q`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) :
α → ℝ → ℝ :=
fun a x ↦ ⨅ q : { q' : ℚ // x < q' }, f a q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def' (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a
= fun (t : ℝ) ↦ ⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // t < r' }, f a r := by
ext t; exact IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def f a t
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_unit_prod {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (a : α) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
= IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a := by
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def']
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f)
include hf
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_eq (a : α) (r : ℚ) :
IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a r = f a r := by
rw [← hf.iInf_rat_gt_eq a r, IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux]
refine Equiv.iInf_congr ?_ ?_
· exact
{ toFun := fun t ↦ ⟨t.1, mod_cast t.2⟩
invFun := fun t ↦ ⟨t.1, mod_cast t.2⟩
left_inv := fun t ↦ by simp only [Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun t ↦ by simp only [Subtype.coe_eta] }
· intro t
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg (a : α) (r : ℝ) :
0 ≤ IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a r := by
have : Nonempty { r' : ℚ // r < ↑r' } := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt r
exact ⟨⟨r, hrx⟩⟩
rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
exact le_ciInf fun r' ↦ hf.nonneg a _
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux (a : α) :
Monotone (IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a) := by
intro x y hxy
have : Nonempty { r' : ℚ // y < ↑r' } := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt y
exact ⟨⟨r, hrx⟩⟩
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
refine le_ciInf fun r ↦ (ciInf_le ?_ ?_).trans_eq ?_
· refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩; rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩; exact hf.nonneg a _
· exact ⟨r.1, hxy.trans_lt r.prop⟩
· rfl
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.continuousWithinAt_stieltjesFunctionAux_Ici (a : α) (x : ℝ) :
ContinuousWithinAt (IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunctionAux f a) (Ici x) x := by
rw [← continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici]
convert Monotone.tendsto_nhdsGT (monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a) x
rw [sInf_image']
have h' : ⨅ r : Ioi x, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r
= ⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r := by
refine Real.iInf_Ioi_eq_iInf_rat_gt x ?_ (monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a)
refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩
rintro ⟨u, -, rfl⟩
exact stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg hf a u
have h'' :
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, stieltjesFunctionAux f a r =
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, f a r := by
congr with r
exact stieltjesFunctionAux_eq hf a r
rw [h', h'', ContinuousWithinAt]
congr!
rw [stieltjesFunctionAux_def]
/-- Extend a function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` with property `IsMeasurableRatCDF` from `ℚ` to `ℝ`,
to a function `α → StieltjesFunction`. -/
noncomputable def IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction (a : α) : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := stieltjesFunctionAux f a
mono' := monotone_stieltjesFunctionAux hf a
right_continuous' x := continuousWithinAt_stieltjesFunctionAux_Ici hf a x
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_eq (a : α) (r : ℚ) : hf.stieltjesFunction a r = f a r :=
stieltjesFunctionAux_eq hf a r
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_nonneg (a : α) (r : ℝ) : 0 ≤ hf.stieltjesFunction a r :=
stieltjesFunctionAux_nonneg hf a r
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_le_one (a : α) (x : ℝ) :
hf.stieltjesFunction a x ≤ 1 := by
obtain ⟨r, hrx⟩ := exists_rat_gt x
rw [← StieltjesFunction.iInf_rat_gt_eq]
simp_rw [IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction_eq]
refine ciInf_le_of_le ?_ ?_ (hf.le_one _ _)
· refine ⟨0, fun z ↦ ?_⟩; rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩; exact hf.nonneg a _
· exact ⟨r, hrx⟩
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_stieltjesFunction_atBot (a : α) :
| Tendsto (hf.stieltjesFunction a) atBot (𝓝 0) := by
have h_exists : ∀ x : ℝ, ∃ q : ℚ, x < q ∧ ↑q < x + 1 := fun x ↦ exists_rat_btwn (lt_add_one x)
let qs : ℝ → ℚ := fun x ↦ (h_exists x).choose
have hqs_tendsto : Tendsto qs atBot atBot := by
rw [tendsto_atBot_atBot]
refine fun q ↦ ⟨q - 1, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have h_le : ↑(qs y) ≤ (q : ℝ) - 1 + 1 :=
(h_exists y).choose_spec.2.le.trans (add_le_add hy le_rfl)
rw [sub_add_cancel] at h_le
exact mod_cast h_le
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
((hf.tendsto_atBot_zero a).comp hqs_tendsto) (stieltjesFunction_nonneg hf a) fun x ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, ← stieltjesFunction_eq hf]
exact (hf.stieltjesFunction a).mono (h_exists x).choose_spec.1.le
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/MeasurableStieltjes.lean | 364 | 378 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
open scoped Finset
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [DivisionMonoid G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
rcases (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h | h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) : IsOfFinOrder a := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at *
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn.bot_lt hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isOfFinOrder_pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) ↔ IsOfFinOrder a ∨ n = 0 := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ .inl <| h.of_pow hn, fun h ↦ (h.resolve_right hn).pow⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
theorem IsConj.isOfFinOrder (h : IsConj x y) : IsOfFinOrder x → IsOfFinOrder y := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨n, n_gt_0, eq'⟩
exact ⟨n, n_gt_0, by rw [← isConj_one_right, ← eq']; exact h.pow n⟩
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
/-- A group element has finite order iff its order is positive. -/
@[to_additive
"A group element has finite additive order iff its order is positive."]
theorem orderOf_pos_iff : 0 < orderOf x ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [iff_not_comm.mp orderOf_eq_zero_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mono [Monoid β] {y : β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (h : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by rw [← orderOf_pos_iff] at hx ⊢; exact Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos h hx
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_ne_one_of_lt_orderOf (n0 : n ≠ 0) (h : n < orderOf x) : x ^ n ≠ 1 := fun j =>
not_isPeriodicPt_of_pos_of_lt_minimalPeriod n0 h ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one x).mpr j)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one (hn : 0 < n) (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ≤ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_le hn (by rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_one : orderOf (1 : G) = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, ← minimalPeriod_id (x := (1 : G)), ← one_mul_eq_id]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.addOrderOf_eq_one_iff]
theorem orderOf_eq_one_iff : orderOf x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_one_iff_isFixedPt, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_addOrderOf_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ n :=
calc
x ^ (n % orderOf x) = x ^ (n % orderOf x + orderOf x * (n / orderOf x)) := by
simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ n := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (h : x ^ n = 1) : orderOf x ∣ n :=
IsPeriodicPt.minimalPeriod_dvd ((isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mpr h)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : orderOf x ∣ n ↔ x ^ n = 1 :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← pow_mod_orderOf, Nat.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, _root_.pow_zero],
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_smul_dvd]
theorem orderOf_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) : orderOf (x ^ n) ∣ orderOf x := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, pow_right_comm, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_pow]
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf : (Set.Iio <| orderOf x).InjOn (x ^ ·) := by
simpa only [mul_left_iterate, mul_one]
using iterate_injOn_Iio_minimalPeriod (f := (x * ·)) (x := 1)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G]
(hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ Submonoid.powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' hx.orderOf_pos <| pow_mod_orderOf _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
(Submonoid.powers x : Set G) = (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_one_iff_modEq : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [MOD orderOf x] := by
rw [modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_map_dvd {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (ψ : G →* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (ψ x) ∣ orderOf x := by
apply orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one
rw [← map_pow, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
apply map_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime (h : n.Coprime (orderOf x)) : ∃ m : ℕ, (x ^ n) ^ m = x := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, coprime_zero_right] at h
exact ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_one, pow_one]⟩
by_cases h1 : orderOf x = 1
· exact ⟨0, by rw [orderOf_eq_one_iff.mp h1, one_pow, one_pow]⟩
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime h (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩)
exact ⟨m, by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mod_orderOf, h, pow_one]⟩
/-- If `x^n = 1`, but `x^(n/p) ≠ 1` for all prime factors `p` of `n`,
then `x` has order `n` in `G`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_of_nsmul_and_div_prime_nsmul "If `n * x = 0`, but `n/p * x ≠ 0` for
all prime factors `p` of `n`, then `x` has order `n` in `G`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime (hn : 0 < n) (hx : x ^ n = 1)
(hd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → x ^ (n / p) ≠ 1) : orderOf x = n := by
-- Let `a` be `n/(orderOf x)`, and show `a = 1`
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hx)
suffices a = 1 by simp [this, ha]
-- Assume `a` is not one...
by_contra h
have a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one : a.minFac ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ b : ℕ, a = b * a.minFac := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd a.minFac_dvd
rw [hb, ← mul_assoc] at ha
exact Dvd.intro_left (orderOf x * b) ha.symm
-- Use the minimum prime factor of `a` as `p`.
refine hd a.minFac (Nat.minFac_prime h) a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one ?_
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, Nat.dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd a_min_fac_dvd_p_sub_one, ha, mul_comm,
Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos _)]
· exact Nat.minFac_dvd a
· rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact Exists.intro n (id ⟨hn, hx⟩)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff {H : Type*} [Monoid H] {y : H} :
orderOf x = orderOf y ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n = 1 ↔ y ^ n = 1 := by
simp_rw [← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, ← minimalPeriod_eq_minimalPeriod_iff, orderOf]
/-- An injective homomorphism of monoids preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive "An injective homomorphism of additive monoids preserves orders of elements."]
theorem orderOf_injective {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : G) :
orderOf (f x) = orderOf x := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff, ← f.map_pow, ← f.map_one, hf.eq_iff, forall_const]
/-- A multiplicative equivalence preserves orders of elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive equivalence preserves orders of elements."]
lemma MulEquiv.orderOf_eq {H : Type*} [Monoid H] (e : G ≃* H) (x : G) :
orderOf (e x) = orderOf x :=
orderOf_injective e.toMonoidHom e.injective x
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.isOfFinOrder_iff [Monoid H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Injective f) :
IsOfFinOrder (f x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [← orderOf_pos_iff, orderOf_injective f hf x, ← orderOf_pos_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast, simp)]
theorem orderOf_submonoid {H : Submonoid G} (y : H) : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective y
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_units {y : Gˣ} : orderOf (y : G) = orderOf y :=
orderOf_injective (Units.coeHom G) Units.ext y
/-- If the order of `x` is finite, then `x` is a unit with inverse `x ^ (orderOf x - 1)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If the additive order of `x` is finite, then `x` is an additive
unit with inverse `(addOrderOf x - 1) • x`. "]
noncomputable def IsOfFinOrder.unit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Mˣ :=
⟨x, x ^ (orderOf x - 1),
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one],
by rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (by exact hx.orderOf_pos), pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.isUnit {M} [Monoid M] {x : M} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsUnit x := ⟨hx.unit, rfl⟩
variable (x)
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_pow' (h : n ≠ 0) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_of_dvd {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (dvd : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / n := by rw [orderOf_pow' _ hn, Nat.gcd_eq_right dvd]
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_pow_orderOf_div {x : G} {n : ℕ} (hx : orderOf x ≠ 0) (hn : n ∣ orderOf x) :
orderOf (x ^ (orderOf x / n)) = n := by
rw [orderOf_pow_of_dvd _ (Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd hn), Nat.div_div_self hn hx]
rw [← Nat.div_mul_cancel hn] at hx; exact left_ne_zero_of_mul hx
variable (n)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n := by
unfold orderOf
rw [← minimalPeriod_iterate_eq_div_gcd' h, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma Nat.Coprime.orderOf_pow (h : (orderOf y).Coprime m) : orderOf (y ^ m) = orderOf y := by
by_cases hg : IsOfFinOrder y
· rw [hg.orderOf_pow y m , h.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
· rw [m.coprime_zero_left.1 (orderOf_eq_zero hg ▸ h), pow_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.natCard_powers_le_orderOf (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) :
Nat.card (powers a : Set G) ≤ orderOf a := by
classical
simpa [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf, Finset.card_range, Nat.Iio_eq_range]
using Finset.card_image_le (s := Finset.range (orderOf a))
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : (powers a : Set G).Finite := by
classical rw [ha.powers_eq_image_range_orderOf]; exact Finset.finite_toSet _
namespace Commute
variable {x}
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (h : Commute x y) :
orderOf (x * y) ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf y) := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact Function.Commute.minimalPeriod_of_comp_dvd_lcm h.function_commute_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul (h : Commute x y):
orderOf y ∣ Nat.lcm (orderOf x) (orderOf (x * y)) := by
by_cases h0 : orderOf x = 0
· rw [h0, lcm_zero_left]
apply dvd_zero
conv_lhs =>
rw [← one_mul y, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one x, ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0),
_root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc]
exact
(((Commute.refl x).mul_right h).pow_left _).orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans
(lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨(orderOf_pow_dvd _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _), dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_dvd_mul_addOrderOf]
theorem orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf (h : Commute x y):
orderOf (x * y) ∣ orderOf x * orderOf y :=
dvd_trans h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm (lcm_dvd_mul _ _)
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_mul_addOrderOf_of_coprime]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_mul_orderOf_of_coprime (h : Commute x y)
(hco : (orderOf x).Coprime (orderOf y)) : orderOf (x * y) = orderOf x * orderOf y := by
rw [orderOf, ← comp_mul_left]
exact h.function_commute_mul_left.minimalPeriod_of_comp_eq_mul_of_coprime hco
/-- Commuting elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Commuting elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_mul (h : Commute x y) (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) :
IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
orderOf_pos_iff.mp <|
pos_of_dvd_of_pos h.orderOf_mul_dvd_mul_orderOf <| mul_pos hx.orderOf_pos hy.orderOf_pos
/-- If each prime factor of `orderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `orderOf y`, and `x` commutes
with `y`, then `x * y` has the same order as `y`. -/
@[to_additive addOrderOf_add_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd
"If each prime factor of
`addOrderOf x` has higher multiplicity in `addOrderOf y`, and `x` commutes with `y`,
then `x + y` has the same order as `y`."]
theorem orderOf_mul_eq_right_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd (h : Commute x y) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y)
(hdvd : ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ orderOf x → p * orderOf x ∣ orderOf y) :
orderOf (x * y) = orderOf y := by
have hoy := hy.orderOf_pos
have hxy := dvd_of_forall_prime_mul_dvd hdvd
apply orderOf_eq_of_pow_and_pow_div_prime hoy <;> simp only [Ne, ← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
· exact h.orderOf_mul_dvd_lcm.trans (lcm_dvd hxy dvd_rfl)
refine fun p hp hpy hd => hp.ne_one ?_
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← mul_dvd_mul_iff_right hoy.ne', one_mul, ← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy]
refine (orderOf_dvd_lcm_mul h).trans (lcm_dvd ((dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd hpy).2 ?_) hd)
by_cases h : p ∣ orderOf x
exacts [hdvd p hp h, (hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd.2 h).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd hpy hxy]
end Commute
section PPrime
variable {x n} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_iff : orderOf x = p ↔ x ^ p = 1 ∧ x ≠ 1 := by
rw [orderOf, minimalPeriod_eq_prime_iff, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, IsFixedPt, mul_one]
/-- The backward direction of `orderOf_eq_prime_iff`. -/
@[to_additive "The backward direction of `addOrderOf_eq_prime_iff`."]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime (hg : x ^ p = 1) (hg1 : x ≠ 1) : orderOf x = p :=
orderOf_eq_prime_iff.mpr ⟨hg, hg1⟩
@[to_additive addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow]
theorem orderOf_eq_prime_pow (hnot : ¬x ^ p ^ n = 1) (hfin : x ^ p ^ (n + 1) = 1) :
orderOf x = p ^ (n + 1) := by
apply minimalPeriod_eq_prime_pow <;> rwa [isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff]
theorem exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff :
(∃ k : ℕ, orderOf x = p ^ k) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, x ^ (p : ℕ) ^ m = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩, fun ⟨_, hm⟩ => by
obtain ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.elim).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hm)
exact ⟨k, hk⟩⟩
end PPrime
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Submonoid.powers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i` -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`AddSubmonoid.multiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`"]
noncomputable def finEquivPowers {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : Fin (orderOf x) ≃ powers x :=
Equiv.ofBijective (fun n ↦ ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), ⟨n, rfl⟩⟩) ⟨fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ij ↦
Fin.ext (pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf h₁ h₂ (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 ij)), fun ⟨_, i, rfl⟩ ↦
⟨⟨i % orderOf x, mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩, Subtype.eq <| pow_mod_orderOf _ _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, rfl⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finEquivPowers_symm_apply {x : G} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, _, rfl⟩ = ⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq, finEquivPowers_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← pow_mod_orderOf, Fin.val_mk]
variable {x n} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x)
include hx
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [pow_add, (hx.isUnit.pow _).mul_eq_left, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h ↦ Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x :=
hx.pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
end Monoid
section CancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G] {x y : G} {a : G} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n ≡ m [MOD orderOf x] := by
wlog hmn : m ≤ n generalizing m n
· rw [eq_comm, ModEq.comm, this (le_of_not_le hmn)]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
rw [← mul_one (x ^ m), pow_add, mul_left_cancel_iff, pow_eq_one_iff_modEq]
exact ⟨fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left _ h, fun h => Nat.ModEq.add_left_cancel' _ h⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : Injective (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow h, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
rwa [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
@[to_additive]
lemma pow_inj_mod {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n % orderOf x = m % orderOf x := pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_inj_iff_of_orderOf_eq_zero (h : orderOf x = 0) {n m : ℕ} : x ^ n = x ^ m ↔ n = m := by
rw [pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, h, modEq_zero_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem infinite_not_isOfFinOrder {x : G} (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) :
{ y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y }.Infinite := by
let s := { n | 0 < n }.image fun n : ℕ => x ^ n
have hs : s ⊆ { y : G | ¬IsOfFinOrder y } := by
rintro - ⟨n, hn : 0 < n, rfl⟩ (contra : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ n))
apply h
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one] at contra ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := contra
exact ⟨n * m, mul_pos hn hm, by rwa [pow_mul]⟩
suffices s.Infinite by exact this.mono hs
contrapose! h
have : ¬Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n := by
have := Set.not_injOn_infinite_finite_image (Set.Ioi_infinite 0) (Set.not_infinite.mp h)
contrapose! this
exact Set.injOn_of_injective this
rwa [injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder, Classical.not_not] at this
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Finite ↔ IsOfFinOrder a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsOfFinOrder.finite_powers⟩
obtain ⟨m, n, hmn, ha⟩ := h.exists_lt_map_eq_of_forall_mem (f := fun n : ℕ ↦ a ^ n)
(fun n ↦ by simp [mem_powers_iff])
refine isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.2 ⟨n - m, tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hmn, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_left_cancel_iff (a := a ^ m), ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn.le, ha, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma infinite_powers : (powers a : Set G).Infinite ↔ ¬ IsOfFinOrder a := finite_powers.not
/-- See also `orderOf_eq_card_powers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `addOrder_eq_card_multiples`."]
lemma Nat.card_submonoidPowers : Nat.card (powers a) = orderOf a := by
classical
by_cases ha : IsOfFinOrder a
· exact (Nat.card_congr (finEquivPowers ha).symm).trans <| by simp
· have := (infinite_powers.2 ha).to_subtype
rw [orderOf_eq_zero ha, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
end CancelMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {x y : G} {i : ℤ}
/-- Inverses of elements of finite order have finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Inverses of elements of finite additive order
have finite additive order."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_inv_iff {x : G} : IsOfFinOrder x⁻¹ ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.of_inv, IsOfFinOrder.inv⟩ := isOfFinOrder_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ i ↔ x ^ i = 1 := by
rcases Int.eq_nat_or_neg i with ⟨i, rfl | rfl⟩
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, zpow_natCast]
· rw [dvd_neg, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem orderOf_inv (x : G) : orderOf x⁻¹ = orderOf x := by simp [orderOf_eq_orderOf_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_sub_iff_zpow_eq_zpow {a b : ℤ} : (orderOf x : ℤ) ∣ a - b ↔ x ^ a = x ^ b := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one, zpow_sub, mul_inv_eq_one]
namespace Subgroup
variable {H : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
lemma orderOf_coe (a : H) : orderOf (a : G) = orderOf a :=
orderOf_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma orderOf_mk (a : G) (ha) : orderOf (⟨a, ha⟩ : H) = orderOf a := (orderOf_coe _).symm
end Subgroup
@[to_additive mod_addOrderOf_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_orderOf (x : G) (z : ℤ) : x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ z :=
calc
x ^ (z % (orderOf x : ℤ)) = x ^ (z % orderOf x + orderOf x * (z / orderOf x) : ℤ) := by
simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
_ = x ^ z := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_smul_addOrderOf]
theorem zpow_pow_orderOf : (x ^ i) ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
by_cases h : IsOfFinOrder x
· rw [← zpow_natCast, ← zpow_mul, mul_comm, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, pow_orderOf_eq_one, one_zpow]
· rw [orderOf_eq_zero h, _root_.pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.zpow (h : IsOfFinOrder x) {i : ℤ} : IsOfFinOrder (x ^ i) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨orderOf x, h.orderOf_pos, zpow_pow_orderOf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.of_mem_zpowers (h : IsOfFinOrder x) (h' : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) :
IsOfFinOrder y := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h'
exact h.zpow
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_of_mem_zpowers (h : y ∈ Subgroup.zpowers x) : orderOf y ∣ orderOf x := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp h
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
exact zpow_pow_orderOf
theorem smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers {α : Type*} [MulAction G α] (hx : x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers y)
{a : α} (hs : y • a = a) : x • a = a := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Subgroup.mem_zpowers_iff.mp hx
rw [← MulAction.toPerm_apply, ← MulAction.toPermHom_apply, MonoidHom.map_zpow _ y k,
MulAction.toPermHom_apply]
exact Function.IsFixedPt.perm_zpow (by exact hs) k -- Porting note: help elab'n with `by exact`
theorem vadd_eq_self_of_mem_zmultiples {α G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α] {x y : G}
(hx : x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples y) {a : α} (hs : y +ᵥ a = a) : x +ᵥ a = a :=
@smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ α _ hx a hs
attribute [to_additive existing] smul_eq_self_of_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ⟨n, by simp_all⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ ⟨(i % orderOf x).natAbs, by
dsimp only
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg <| Int.emod_nonneg _ <|
Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 <| hx.orderOf_pos, zpow_mod_orderOf]⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.powers_eq_zpowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma IsOfFinOrder.mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers.symm.trans hx.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Fin (orderOf x)` and `Subgroup.zpowers x`, sending `i` to `x ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive "The equivalence between `Fin (addOrderOf a)` and
`Subgroup.zmultiples a`, sending `i` to `i • a`."]
noncomputable def finEquivZPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Fin (orderOf x) ≃ zpowers x :=
(finEquivPowers hx).trans <| Equiv.setCongr hx.powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) {n : Fin (orderOf x)} :
finEquivZPowers hx n = ⟨x ^ (n : ℕ), n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma finEquivZPowers_symm_apply (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (n : ℕ) :
(finEquivZPowers hx).symm ⟨x ^ n, ⟨n, by simp⟩⟩ =
⟨n % orderOf x, Nat.mod_lt _ hx.orderOf_pos⟩ := by
rw [finEquivZPowers, Equiv.symm_trans_apply]; exact finEquivPowers_symm_apply _ n
end Group
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid G] {x y : G}
/-- Elements of finite order are closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite additive order are closed under addition."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.mul (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) (hy : IsOfFinOrder y) : IsOfFinOrder (x * y) :=
(Commute.all x y).isOfFinOrder_mul hx hy
end CommMonoid
section FiniteMonoid
variable [Monoid G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_card_orderOf_eq_card_pow_eq_one [Fintype G] [DecidableEq G] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ m ∈ divisors n, #{x : G | orderOf x = m} = #{x : G | x ^ n = 1} := by
refine (Finset.card_biUnion ?_).symm.trans ?_
· simp +contextual [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff]
· congr; ext; simp [hn, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card_univ [Fintype G] : orderOf x ≤ Fintype.card G :=
Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range (x ^ ·) (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _) pow_injOn_Iio_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_card [Finite G] : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨⟩ := nonempty_fintype G
simpa using orderOf_le_card_univ
end FiniteMonoid
section FiniteCancelMonoid
variable [LeftCancelMonoid G]
-- TODO: Of course everything also works for `RightCancelMonoid`.
section Finite
variable [Finite G] {x y : G} {n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Use this to show that a finite left cancellative monoid is a group.
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_of_finite (x : G) : IsOfFinOrder x := by
by_contra h; exact infinite_not_isOfFinOrder h <| Set.toFinite _
/-- This is the same as `IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit assumption since this
is automatic in case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos` but with one fewer explicit
assumption since this is automatic in case of a finite cancellative additive monoid."]
lemma orderOf_pos (x : G) : 0 < orderOf x := (isOfFinOrder_of_finite x).orderOf_pos
/-- This is the same as `orderOf_pow'` and `orderOf_pow''` but with one assumption less which is
automatic in the case of a finite cancellative monoid. -/
@[to_additive "This is the same as `addOrderOf_nsmul'` and
`addOrderOf_nsmul` but with one assumption less which is automatic in the case of a
finite cancellative additive monoid."]
theorem orderOf_pow (x : G) : orderOf (x ^ n) = orderOf x / gcd (orderOf x) n :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).orderOf_pow ..
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
Finset.mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' (orderOf_pos x) <| pow_mod_orderOf _
/-- The equivalence between `Submonoid.powers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Submonoid.multiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def powersEquivPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) : powers x ≃ powers y :=
(finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <|
(finCongr h).trans <| finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem powersEquivPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
powersEquivPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, rfl⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, rfl⟩ := by
rw [powersEquivPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G}
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_eq_card_powers : orderOf x = Fintype.card (powers x : Submonoid G) :=
(Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩
end FiniteCancelMonoid
section FiniteGroup
variable [Group G] {x y : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq {n : ℤ} : x ^ n = 1 ↔ n ≡ 0 [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, orderOf_dvd_iff_zpow_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq {m n : ℤ} : x ^ m = x ^ n ↔ m ≡ n [ZMOD orderOf x] := by
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← zpow_sub, zpow_eq_one_iff_modEq, Int.modEq_iff_dvd, Int.modEq_iff_dvd,
zero_sub, neg_sub]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem injective_zpow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder : (Injective fun n : ℤ => x ^ n) ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h n m hnm => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro h ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn.ne' (h <| by simpa using hx)
rwa [zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_zero_iff.2 h, Nat.cast_zero, Int.modEq_zero_iff] at hnm
section Finite
variable [Finite G]
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_zpow_eq_one (x : G) : ∃ (i : ℤ) (_ : i ≠ 0), x ^ (i : ℤ) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨w, hw1, hw2⟩ := isOfFinOrder_of_finite x
refine ⟨w, Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (_root_.ne_of_gt hw1), ?_⟩
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact (isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hw2
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers : y ∈ powers x ↔ y ∈ zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma powers_eq_zpowers (x : G) : (powers x : Set G) = zpowers x :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).powers_eq_zpowers
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
y ∈ zpowers x ↔ y ∈ (Finset.range (orderOf x)).image (x ^ ·) :=
(isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf
/-- The equivalence between `Subgroup.zpowers` of two elements `x, y` of the same order, mapping
`x ^ i` to `y ^ i`. -/
@[to_additive
"The equivalence between `Subgroup.zmultiples` of two elements `a, b` of the same additive order,
mapping `i • a` to `i • b`."]
noncomputable def zpowersEquivZPowers (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) :
Subgroup.zpowers x ≃ Subgroup.zpowers y :=
(finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _).symm.trans <| (finCongr h).trans <|
finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zmultiples_equiv_zmultiples_apply]
theorem zpowersEquivZPowers_apply (h : orderOf x = orderOf y) (n : ℕ) :
zpowersEquivZPowers h ⟨x ^ n, n, zpow_natCast x n⟩ = ⟨y ^ n, n, zpow_natCast y n⟩ := by
rw [zpowersEquivZPowers, Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.trans_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply, ←
Equiv.eq_symm_apply, finEquivZPowers_symm_apply]
simp [h]
end Finite
variable [Fintype G] {x : G} {n : ℕ}
/-- See also `Nat.card_zpowers`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Nat.card_zmultiples`."]
theorem Fintype.card_zpowers : Fintype.card (zpowers x) = orderOf x :=
(Fintype.card_eq.2 ⟨finEquivZPowers <| isOfFinOrder_of_finite _⟩).symm.trans <|
Fintype.card_fin (orderOf x)
@[to_additive]
theorem card_zpowers_le (a : G) {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0)
(ha : a ^ k = 1) : Fintype.card (Subgroup.zpowers a) ≤ k := by
rw [Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt ha
open QuotientGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_card : orderOf x ∣ Fintype.card G := by
classical
have ft_prod : Fintype ((G ⧸ zpowers x) × zpowers x) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv G groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
have ft_s : Fintype (zpowers x) := @Fintype.prodRight _ _ _ ft_prod _
have ft_cosets : Fintype (G ⧸ zpowers x) :=
@Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ ft_prod ⟨⟨1, (zpowers x).one_mem⟩⟩
have eq₁ : Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
Fintype.card G = @Fintype.card _ ft_prod :=
@Fintype.card_congr _ _ _ ft_prod groupEquivQuotientProdSubgroup
_ = @Fintype.card _ (@instFintypeProd _ _ ft_cosets ft_s) :=
congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
_ = @Fintype.card _ ft_cosets * @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
@Fintype.card_prod _ _ ft_cosets ft_s
have eq₂ : orderOf x = @Fintype.card _ ft_s :=
calc
orderOf x = _ := Fintype.card_zpowers.symm
_ = _ := congr_arg (@Fintype.card _) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Dvd.intro (@Fintype.card (G ⧸ Subgroup.zpowers x) ft_cosets) (by rw [eq₁, eq₂, mul_comm])
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (x : G) : orderOf x ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain h | h := fintypeOrInfinite G
· simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, orderOf_dvd_card]
· simp only [card_eq_zero_of_infinite, dvd_zero]
@[to_additive]
nonrec lemma Subgroup.orderOf_dvd_natCard {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) :
orderOf x ∣ Nat.card s := by simpa using orderOf_dvd_natCard (⟨x, hx⟩ : s)
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Subgroup G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s :=
le_of_dvd (Nat.card_pos_iff.2 <| ⟨s.coe_nonempty.to_subtype, hs.to_subtype⟩) <|
s.orderOf_dvd_natCard hx
@[to_additive]
lemma Submonoid.orderOf_le_card {G : Type*} [Group G] (s : Submonoid G) (hs : (s : Set G).Finite)
{x} (hx : x ∈ s) : orderOf x ≤ Nat.card s := by
rw [← Nat.card_submonoidPowers]; exact Nat.card_mono hs <| powers_le.2 hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero']
theorem pow_card_eq_one' {G : Type*} [Group G] {x : G} : x ^ Nat.card G = 1 :=
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.mp <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) card_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_card_eq_one : x ^ Fintype.card G = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.pow_index_mem {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H] (g : G) :
g ^ index H ∈ H := by rw [← eq_one_iff, QuotientGroup.mk_pow H, index, pow_card_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n orderOf_dvd_card, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_card_zsmul]
theorem zpow_mod_card (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Fintype.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 orderOf_dvd_card), zpow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_nsmul]
lemma pow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← pow_mod_orderOf, ← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, pow_mod_orderOf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) mod_natCard_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mod_natCard {G} [Group G] (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n % Nat.card G : ℤ) = a ^ n := by
rw [eq_comm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n <|
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| orderOf_dvd_natCard _, zpow_mod_orderOf]
/-- If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the `n`th power map is a bijection -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "If `gcd(|G|,n)=1` then the smul by `n` is a bijection"]
noncomputable def powCoprime {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : G ≃ G where
toFun g := g ^ n
invFun g := g ^ (Nat.card G).gcdB n
left_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
right_inv g := by
have key := congr_arg (g ^ ·) ((Nat.card G).gcd_eq_gcd_ab n)
dsimp only at key
rwa [zpow_add, zpow_mul, zpow_mul', zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, h.gcd_eq_one,
pow_one, pow_card_eq_one', one_zpow, one_mul, eq_comm] at key
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_one {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) : powCoprime h 1 = 1 :=
one_pow n
@[to_additive]
theorem powCoprime_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (h : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) {g : G} :
powCoprime h g⁻¹ = (powCoprime h g)⁻¹ :=
inv_pow g n
@[to_additive Nat.Coprime.nsmul_right_bijective]
lemma Nat.Coprime.pow_left_bijective {G} [Group G] (hn : (Nat.card G).Coprime n) :
Bijective (· ^ n : G → G) :=
(powCoprime hn).bijective
/- TODO: Generalise to `Submonoid.powers`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem image_range_orderOf [DecidableEq G] :
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
Finset.image (fun i => x ^ i) (Finset.range (orderOf x)) = (zpowers x : Set G).toFinset := by
letI : Fintype (zpowers x) := (Subgroup.zpowers x).instFintypeSubtypeMemOfDecidablePred
ext x
rw [Set.mem_toFinset, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_zpowers_iff_mem_range_orderOf]
/- TODO: Generalise to `Finite` + `CancelMonoid`. -/
@[to_additive gcd_nsmul_card_eq_zero_iff]
theorem pow_gcd_card_eq_one_iff : x ^ n = 1 ↔ x ^ gcd n (Fintype.card G) = 1 :=
⟨fun h => pow_gcd_eq_one _ h <| pow_card_eq_one, fun h => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := gcd_dvd_left n (Fintype.card G)
rw [hm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]⟩
lemma smul_eq_of_le_smul
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : a ≤ g • a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (le_pow_smul h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm key h
lemma smul_eq_of_smul_le
{G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] {α : Type*} [PartialOrder α] {g : G} {a : α}
[MulAction G α] [CovariantClass G α HSMul.hSMul LE.le] (h : g • a ≤ a) : g • a = a := by
have key := smul_mono_right g (pow_smul_le h (Nat.card G - 1))
rw [smul_smul, ← _root_.pow_succ',
Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos Nat.card_pos, pow_card_eq_one', one_smul] at key
exact le_antisymm h key
end FiniteGroup
section PowIsSubgroup
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative monoid is a submonoid -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite cancellative add monoid is a submonoid"]
def submonoidOfIdempotent {M : Type*} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [Finite M] (S : Set M)
(hS1 : S.Nonempty) (hS2 : S * S = S) : Submonoid M :=
have pow_mem (a : M) (ha : a ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n + 1) ∈ S := by
induction n with
| zero => rwa [zero_add, pow_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [← hS2, pow_succ]
exact Set.mul_mem_mul ih ha
{ carrier := S
one_mem' := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS1
rw [← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_of_lt (orderOf_pos a))]
exact pow_mem a ha (orderOf a - 1)
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => (congr_arg₂ (· ∈ ·) rfl hS2).mp (Set.mul_mem_mul ha hb) }
/-- A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite group is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive "A nonempty idempotent subset of a finite add group is a subgroup"]
def subgroupOfIdempotent {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (S : Set G) (hS1 : S.Nonempty)
(hS2 : S * S = S) : Subgroup G :=
{ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 with
carrier := S
inv_mem' := fun {a} ha => show a⁻¹ ∈ submonoidOfIdempotent S hS1 hS2 by
rw [← one_mul a⁻¹, ← pow_one a, ← pow_orderOf_eq_one a, ← pow_sub a (orderOf_pos a)]
exact pow_mem ha (orderOf a - 1) }
/-- If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite group `G`, then `S ^ |G|` is a subgroup -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!) smulCardAddSubgroup
"If `S` is a nonempty subset of a finite add group `G`, then `|G| • S` is a subgroup"]
def powCardSubgroup {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (S : Set G) (hS : S.Nonempty) : Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ S ^ Fintype.card G := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hS
rw [← pow_card_eq_one]
exact Set.pow_mem_pow ha
subgroupOfIdempotent (S ^ Fintype.card G) ⟨1, one_mem⟩ <| by
classical
apply (Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_mul_left _ one_mem) (ge_of_eq _)).symm
simp_rw [← pow_add,
Group.card_pow_eq_card_pow_card_univ S (Fintype.card G + Fintype.card G) le_add_self]
end PowIsSubgroup
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_one (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, ha⟩ := ha.exists_pow_eq_one
exact (pow_eq_one_iff_of_nonneg ha₀ hn.ne').1 ha
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring G] [LinearOrder G] [IsStrictOrderedRing G] {a x : G}
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.eq_neg_one (ha₀ : a ≤ 0) (ha : IsOfFinOrder a) : a = -1 :=
(sq_eq_one_iff.1 <| ha.pow.eq_one <| sq_nonneg a).resolve_left <| by
rintro rfl; exact one_pos.not_le ha₀
theorem orderOf_abs_ne_one (h : |x| ≠ 1) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
intro n hn hx
replace hx : |x| ^ n = 1 := by simpa only [abs_one, abs_pow] using congr_arg abs hx
rcases h.lt_or_lt with h | h
· exact ((pow_lt_one₀ (abs_nonneg x) h hn.ne').ne hx).elim
· exact ((one_lt_pow₀ h hn.ne').ne' hx).elim
theorem LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two : orderOf x ≤ 2 := by
rcases ne_or_eq |x| 1 with h | h
· simp [orderOf_abs_ne_one h]
rcases eq_or_eq_neg_of_abs_eq h with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
exact orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one zero_lt_two (by simp)
end LinearOrderedRing
section Prod
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {x : α × β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Prod.orderOf (x : α × β) : orderOf x = (orderOf x.1).lcm (orderOf x.2) :=
minimalPeriod_prodMap _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.1 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_fst_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf : orderOf x.2 ∣ orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_snd_dvd
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.fst {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.1 :=
hx.mono orderOf_fst_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.snd {x : α × β} (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) : IsOfFinOrder x.2 :=
hx.mono orderOf_snd_dvd_orderOf
@[to_additive IsOfFinAddOrder.prod_mk]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.prod_mk : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder b → IsOfFinOrder (a, b) := by
simpa only [← orderOf_pos_iff, Prod.orderOf] using Nat.lcm_pos
@[to_additive]
lemma Prod.orderOf_mk : orderOf (a, b) = Nat.lcm (orderOf a) (orderOf b) :=
(a, b).orderOf
end Prod
-- TODO: Corresponding `pi` lemmas. We cannot currently state them here because of import cycles
@[simp]
lemma Nat.cast_card_eq_zero (R) [AddGroupWithOne R] [Fintype R] : (Fintype.card R : R) = 0 := by
rw [← nsmul_one, card_nsmul_eq_zero]
section NonAssocRing
variable (R : Type*) [NonAssocRing R] (p : ℕ)
lemma CharP.addOrderOf_one : CharP R (addOrderOf (1 : R)) where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_dvd_iff_nsmul_eq_zero]
variable [Fintype R]
variable {R} in
lemma charP_of_ne_zero (hn : card R = p) (hR : ∀ i < p, (i : R) = 0 → i = 0) : CharP R p where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by
have H : (p : R) = 0 := by rw [← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n p, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul, add_zero] at h
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
apply hR _ (Nat.mod_lt _ _) h
rw [← hn, gt_iff_lt, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
exact ⟨0⟩
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_mul, H, zero_mul]
end NonAssocRing
|
lemma charP_of_prime_pow_injective (R) [Ring R] [Fintype R] (p n : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(hn : card R = p ^ n) (hR : ∀ i ≤ n, (p : R) ^ i = 0 → i = n) : CharP R (p ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := CharP.exists R
have hcpn : c ∣ p ^ n := by rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R c, ← hn, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero]
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ : ∃ i ≤ n, c = p ^ i := by rwa [Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.1] at hcpn
obtain rfl : i = n := hR i hi <| by rw [← Nat.cast_pow, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 1,147 | 1,153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
/-!
# Higher differentiability in finite dimensions.
-/
noncomputable section
universe uD uE uF
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{D : Type uD} [NormedAddCommGroup D] [NormedSpace 𝕜 D]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
{n : WithTop ℕ∞} {f : D → E} {s : Set D}
/-! ### Finite dimensional results -/
section FiniteDimensional
open Function Module
open scoped ContDiff
variable [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
|
/-- A family of continuous linear maps is `C^n` on `s` if all its applications are. -/
theorem contDiffOn_clm_apply {f : D → E →L[𝕜] F} {s : Set D} [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ ∀ y, ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => f x y) s := by
refine ⟨fun h y => h.clm_apply contDiffOn_const, fun h => ?_⟩
let d := finrank 𝕜 E
have hd : d = finrank 𝕜 (Fin d → 𝕜) := (finrank_fin_fun 𝕜).symm
let e₁ := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq hd
let e₂ := (e₁.arrowCongr (1 : F ≃L[𝕜] F)).trans (ContinuousLinearEquiv.piRing (Fin d))
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/FiniteDimension.lean | 35 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.LocalizationLocalization
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.Sites
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Functors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LocalizedModule.Basic
/-!
# $Spec$ as a functor to locally ringed spaces.
We define the functor $Spec$ from commutative rings to locally ringed spaces.
## Implementation notes
We define $Spec$ in three consecutive steps, each with more structure than the last:
1. `Spec.toTop`, valued in the category of topological spaces,
2. `Spec.toSheafedSpace`, valued in the category of sheafed spaces and
3. `Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace`, valued in the category of locally ringed spaces.
Additionally, we provide `Spec.toPresheafedSpace` as a composition of `Spec.toSheafedSpace` with
a forgetful functor.
## Related results
The adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` is constructed in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/GammaSpecAdjunction.lean`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
universe u v
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open StructureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a topological space.
-/
def Spec.topObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
@[simp] theorem Spec.topObj_forget {R} : ToType (Spec.topObj R) = PrimeSpectrum R :=
rfl
/-- The induced map of a ring homomorphism on the ring spectra, as a morphism of topological spaces.
-/
def Spec.topMap {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) : Spec.topObj S ⟶ Spec.topObj R :=
TopCat.ofHom (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom)
@[simp]
theorem Spec.topMap_id (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : Spec.topMap (𝟙 R) = 𝟙 (Spec.topObj R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Spec.topMap_comp {R S T : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) :
Spec.topMap (f ≫ g) = Spec.topMap g ≫ Spec.topMap f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: `simps!` generate some garbage lemmas, so choose manually,
-- if more is needed, add them here
/-- The spectrum, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to topological spaces.
-/
@[simps!]
def Spec.toTop : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ TopCat where
obj R := Spec.topObj (unop R)
map {_ _} f := Spec.topMap f.unop
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a `SheafedSpace`.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : SheafedSpace CommRingCat where
carrier := Spec.topObj R
presheaf := (structureSheaf R).1
IsSheaf := (structureSheaf R).2
/-- The induced map of a ring homomorphism on the ring spectra, as a morphism of sheafed spaces.
-/
@[simps base c_app]
def Spec.sheafedSpaceMap {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.sheafedSpaceObj S ⟶ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R where
base := Spec.topMap f
c :=
{ app := fun U => CommRingCat.ofHom <|
comap f.hom (unop U) ((TopologicalSpace.Opens.map (Spec.topMap f)).obj (unop U)) fun _ => id
naturality := fun {_ _} _ => by ext; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_id {R : CommRingCat.{u}} :
Spec.sheafedSpaceMap (𝟙 R) = 𝟙 (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ (Spec.topMap_id R) <| by
ext
dsimp
rw [comap_id (by simp)]
simp
rfl
theorem Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp {R S T : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) :
Spec.sheafedSpaceMap (f ≫ g) = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap g ≫ Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f :=
AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ (Spec.topMap_comp f g) <| by
ext
-- Porting note: was one liner
-- `dsimp, rw category_theory.functor.map_id, rw category.comp_id, erw comap_comp f g, refl`
rw [NatTrans.comp_app, sheafedSpaceMap_c_app, whiskerRight_app, eqToHom_refl]
erw [(sheafedSpaceObj T).presheaf.map_id]
dsimp only [CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
rw [comap_comp]
rfl
/-- Spec, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to sheafed spaces.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.toSheafedSpace : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ SheafedSpace CommRingCat where
obj R := Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (unop R)
map f := Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f.unop
map_comp f g := by simp [Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp]
/-- Spec, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to presheafed spaces.
-/
def Spec.toPresheafedSpace : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ PresheafedSpace CommRingCat :=
Spec.toSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace
@[simp]
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj (R : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.obj R = (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj (unop R)).toPresheafedSpace :=
rfl
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_obj_op (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.obj (op R) = (Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R).toPresheafedSpace :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map (R S : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ) (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.map f = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f.unop :=
rfl
theorem Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map_op (R S : CommRingCat.{u}) (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.toPresheafedSpace.map f.op = Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f :=
rfl
theorem Spec.basicOpen_hom_ext {X : RingedSpace.{u}} {R : CommRingCat.{u}}
{α β : X ⟶ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R} (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : ∀ r : R,
let U := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r
(toOpen R U ≫ α.c.app (op U)) ≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by rw [w])) =
toOpen R U ≫ β.c.app (op U)) :
α = β := by
ext : 1
· exact w
· apply
((TopCat.Sheaf.pushforward _ β.base).obj X.sheaf).hom_ext _ PrimeSpectrum.isBasis_basic_opens
intro r
apply (StructureSheaf.to_basicOpen_epi R r).1
simpa using h r
-- Porting note: `simps!` generate some garbage lemmas, so choose manually,
-- if more is needed, add them here
/-- The spectrum of a commutative ring, as a `LocallyRingedSpace`.
-/
@[simps! toSheafedSpace presheaf]
def Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : LocallyRingedSpace :=
{ Spec.sheafedSpaceObj R with
isLocalRing := fun x =>
RingEquiv.isLocalRing (A := Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal)
(Iso.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv <| stalkIso R x).symm }
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_sheaf (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R).sheaf = structureSheaf R := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_sheaf' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).sheaf = structureSheaf R := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf_map (R : CommRingCat.{u}) {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R).presheaf.map i =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).presheaf = (structureSheaf R).1 := rfl
lemma Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj_presheaf_map' (R : Type u) [CommRing R] {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj <| CommRingCat.of R).presheaf.map i =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i := rfl
@[elementwise]
theorem stalkMap_toStalk {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (p : PrimeSpectrum S) :
toStalk R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p) ≫ (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f).stalkMap p =
f ≫ toStalk S p := by
rw [← toOpen_germ S ⊤ p trivial, ← toOpen_germ R ⊤ (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p) trivial,
Category.assoc]
erw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap_germ (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f) ⊤ p trivial]
rw [Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_c_app]
erw [toOpen_comp_comap_assoc]
rfl
/-- Under the isomorphisms `stalkIso`, the map `stalkMap (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f) p` corresponds
to the induced local ring homomorphism `Localization.localRingHom`.
-/
@[elementwise]
theorem localRingHom_comp_stalkIso {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (p : PrimeSpectrum S) :
(stalkIso R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p)).hom ≫
(CommRingCat.ofHom (Localization.localRingHom (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p).asIdeal p.asIdeal
f.hom rfl)) ≫
(stalkIso S p).inv =
(Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f).stalkMap p :=
(stalkIso R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p)).eq_inv_comp.mp <|
(stalkIso S p).comp_inv_eq.mpr <| CommRingCat.hom_ext <|
Localization.localRingHom_unique _ _ _ (PrimeSpectrum.comap_asIdeal _ _) fun x => by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644 and https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386
rw [stalkIso_hom, stalkIso_inv, CommRingCat.comp_apply, CommRingCat.comp_apply,
localizationToStalk_of, stalkMap_toStalk_apply f p x]
erw [stalkToFiberRingHom_toStalk]
rfl
/-- Version of `localRingHom_comp_stalkIso_apply` using `CommRingCat.Hom.hom` -/
theorem localRingHom_comp_stalkIso_apply' {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (p : PrimeSpectrum S)
(x) :
(stalkIso S p).inv ((Localization.localRingHom (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p).asIdeal p.asIdeal
f.hom rfl) ((stalkIso R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p)).hom x)) =
(Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f).stalkMap p x :=
localRingHom_comp_stalkIso_apply _ _ _
/--
The induced map of a ring homomorphism on the prime spectra, as a morphism of locally ringed spaces.
-/
@[simps toShHom]
def Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) :
Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj S ⟶ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R :=
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.mk (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f) fun p =>
IsLocalHom.mk fun a ha => by
-- Here, we are showing that the map on prime spectra induced by `f` is really a morphism of
-- *locally* ringed spaces, i.e. that the induced map on the stalks is a local ring
-- homomorphism.
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
It's this `erw` that is blowing up. The implicit arguments differ significantly. -/
erw [← localRingHom_comp_stalkIso_apply' f p a] at ha
have : IsLocalHom (stalkIso (↑S) p).inv.hom := isLocalHom_of_isIso _
replace ha := (isUnit_map_iff (stalkIso S p).inv.hom _).mp ha
replace ha := IsLocalHom.map_nonunit
((stalkIso R ((PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom) p)).hom a) ha
convert RingHom.isUnit_map (stalkIso R (PrimeSpectrum.comap f.hom p)).inv.hom ha
rw [← CommRingCat.comp_apply, Iso.hom_inv_id, CommRingCat.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_id (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap (𝟙 R) = 𝟙 (Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj R) :=
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext' <| by
rw [Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_toShHom, Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_id]; rfl
theorem Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_comp {R S T : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) :
Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap (f ≫ g) =
Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap g ≫ Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f :=
LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext' <| by
rw [Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_toShHom, Spec.sheafedSpaceMap_comp]; rfl
/-- Spec, as a contravariant functor from commutative rings to locally ringed spaces.
-/
@[simps]
def Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace : CommRingCat.{u}ᵒᵖ ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace where
obj R := Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (unop R)
map f := Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap f.unop
map_id R := by dsimp; rw [Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_id]
map_comp f g := by dsimp; rw [Spec.locallyRingedSpaceMap_comp]
section SpecΓ
open AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace
/-- The counit morphism `R ⟶ Γ(Spec R)` given by `AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.toOpen`. -/
def toSpecΓ (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : R ⟶ Γ.obj (op (Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj (op R))) :=
StructureSheaf.toOpen R ⊤
instance isIso_toSpecΓ (R : CommRingCat.{u}) : IsIso (toSpecΓ R) := by
cases R; apply StructureSheaf.isIso_to_global
@[reassoc]
theorem Spec_Γ_naturality {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) :
f ≫ toSpecΓ S = toSpecΓ R ≫ Γ.map (Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.map f.op).op := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `ext` failed to pick up one of the three lemmas
ext : 2
refine Subtype.ext <| funext fun x' => ?_; symm
apply Localization.localRingHom_to_map
/-- The counit (`SpecΓIdentity.inv.op`) of the adjunction `Γ ⊣ Spec` is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps! hom_app inv_app]
def LocallyRingedSpace.SpecΓIdentity : Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.rightOp ⋙ Γ ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
Iso.symm <| NatIso.ofComponents.{u,u,u+1,u+1} (fun R =>
-- Porting note: In Lean3, this `IsIso` is synthesized automatically
letI : IsIso (toSpecΓ R) := StructureSheaf.isIso_to_global _
asIso (toSpecΓ R)) fun {X Y} f => by convert Spec_Γ_naturality (R := X) (S := Y) f
end SpecΓ
/-- The stalk map of `Spec M⁻¹R ⟶ Spec R` is an iso for each `p : Spec M⁻¹R`. -/
theorem Spec_map_localization_isIso (R : CommRingCat.{u}) (M : Submonoid R)
(x : PrimeSpectrum (Localization M)) :
IsIso
((Spec.toPresheafedSpace.map
(CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R (Localization M))).op).stalkMap x) := by
dsimp only [Spec.toPresheafedSpace_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op]
rw [← localRingHom_comp_stalkIso]
-- Porting note: replaced `apply (config := { instances := false })`.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
refine IsIso.comp_isIso' inferInstance (IsIso.comp_isIso' ?_ inferInstance)
/- I do not know why this is defeq to the goal, but I'm happy to accept that it is. -/
show
IsIso (IsLocalization.localizationLocalizationAtPrimeIsoLocalization M
x.asIdeal).toRingEquiv.toCommRingCatIso.hom
infer_instance
namespace StructureSheaf
variable {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (f : R ⟶ S) (p : PrimeSpectrum R)
/-- For an algebra `f : R →+* S`, this is the ring homomorphism `S →+* (f∗ 𝒪ₛ)ₚ` for a `p : Spec R`.
This is shown to be the localization at `p` in `isLocalizedModule_toPushforwardStalkAlgHom`.
-/
def toPushforwardStalk : S ⟶ (Spec.topMap f _* (structureSheaf S).1).stalk p :=
StructureSheaf.toOpen S ⊤ ≫
@TopCat.Presheaf.germ _ _ _ _ (Spec.topMap f _* (structureSheaf S).1) ⊤ p trivial
@[reassoc]
theorem toPushforwardStalk_comp :
f ≫ StructureSheaf.toPushforwardStalk f p =
StructureSheaf.toStalk R p ≫
(TopCat.Presheaf.stalkFunctor _ _).map (Spec.sheafedSpaceMap f).c := by
rw [StructureSheaf.toStalk, Category.assoc, TopCat.Presheaf.stalkFunctor_map_germ]
exact Spec_Γ_naturality_assoc f _
instance : Algebra R ((Spec.topMap f _* (structureSheaf S).1).stalk p) :=
(f ≫ StructureSheaf.toPushforwardStalk f p).hom.toAlgebra
theorem algebraMap_pushforward_stalk :
algebraMap R ((Spec.topMap f _* (structureSheaf S).1).stalk p) =
(f ≫ StructureSheaf.toPushforwardStalk f p).hom :=
rfl
variable (R S)
variable [Algebra R S]
/--
This is the `AlgHom` version of `toPushforwardStalk`, which is the map `S ⟶ (f∗ 𝒪ₛ)ₚ` for some
algebra `R ⟶ S` and some `p : Spec R`.
-/
@[simps!]
def toPushforwardStalkAlgHom :
S →ₐ[R] (Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _* (structureSheaf S).1).stalk p :=
{ (StructureSheaf.toPushforwardStalk (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) p).hom with
commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
theorem isLocalizedModule_toPushforwardStalkAlgHom_aux (y) :
∃ x : S × p.asIdeal.primeCompl, x.2 • y = toPushforwardStalkAlgHom R S p x.1 := by
obtain ⟨U, hp, s, e⟩ := TopCat.Presheaf.germ_exist _ _ y
obtain ⟨_, ⟨r, rfl⟩, hpr : p ∈ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r, hrU : PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r ≤ U⟩ :=
PrimeSpectrum.isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.exists_subset_of_mem_open (show p ∈ U from hp) U.2
change PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen r ≤ U at hrU
replace e :=
((Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _* (structureSheaf S).1).germ_res_apply
(homOfLE hrU) p hpr _).trans e
set s' := (Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _* (structureSheaf S).1).map
(homOfLE hrU).op s with h
replace e : ((Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _* (structureSheaf S).val).germ _
p hpr) s' = y := by
rw [h]; exact e
clear_value s'; clear! U
obtain ⟨⟨s, ⟨_, n, rfl⟩⟩, hsn⟩ :=
@IsLocalization.surj _ _ _ _ _ _
(StructureSheaf.IsLocalization.to_basicOpen S <| algebraMap R S r) s'
refine ⟨⟨s, ⟨r, hpr⟩ ^ n⟩, ?_⟩
rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Algebra.smul_def, algebraMap_pushforward_stalk, toPushforwardStalk,
CommRingCat.comp_apply, CommRingCat.comp_apply]
iterate 2
erw [← (Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _* (structureSheaf S).1).germ_res_apply
(homOfLE le_top) p hpr]
rw [← e]
| let f := TopCat.Presheaf.germ (Spec.topMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap R S)) _*
(structureSheaf S).val) _ p hpr
rw [← map_mul, mul_comm]
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at hsn
rw [← map_pow (algebraMap R S)] at hsn
congr 1
instance isLocalizedModule_toPushforwardStalkAlgHom :
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Spec.lean | 391 | 398 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Norm
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 789 | 792 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
/-!
# Metric space gluing
Gluing two metric spaces along a common subset. Formally, we are given
```
Φ
Z ---> X
|
|Ψ
v
Y
```
where `hΦ : Isometry Φ` and `hΨ : Isometry Ψ`.
We want to complete the square by a space `GlueSpacescan hΦ hΨ` and two isometries
`toGlueL hΦ hΨ` and `toGlueR hΦ hΨ` that make the square commute.
We start by defining a predistance on the disjoint union `X ⊕ Y`, for which
points `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance 0. The (quotient) metric space associated
to this predistance is the desired space.
This is an instance of a more general construction, where `Φ` and `Ψ` do not have to be isometries,
but the distances in the image almost coincide, up to `2ε` say. Then one can almost glue the two
spaces so that the images of a point under `Φ` and `Ψ` are `ε`-close. If `ε > 0`, this yields a
metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, without the need to take a quotient. In particular,
this gives a natural metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, where the basepoints
are at distance 1, say, and the distances between other points are obtained by going through the two
basepoints.
(We also register the same metric space structure on a general disjoint union `Σ i, E i`).
We also define the inductive limit of metric spaces. Given
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and `f n` isometric embeddings, we define the inductive
limit of the `X n`, also known as the increasing union of the `X n` in this context, if we
identify `X n` and `X (n+1)` through `f n`. This is a metric space in which all `X n` embed
isometrically and in a way compatible with `f n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Function Set Uniformity Topology
namespace Metric
section ApproxGluing
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y} {ε : ℝ}
/-- Define a predistance on `X ⊕ Y`, for which `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance `ε` -/
def glueDist (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : X ⊕ Y → X ⊕ Y → ℝ
| .inl x, .inl y => dist x y
| .inr x, .inr y => dist x y
| .inl x, .inr y => (⨅ p, dist x (Φ p) + dist y (Ψ p)) + ε
| .inr x, .inl y => (⨅ p, dist y (Φ p) + dist x (Ψ p)) + ε
private theorem glueDist_self (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : ∀ x, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x x = 0
| .inl _ => dist_self _
| .inr _ => dist_self _
theorem glueDist_glued_points [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (p : Z) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl (Φ p)) (.inr (Ψ p)) = ε := by
have : ⨅ q, dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) = 0 := by
have A : ∀ q, 0 ≤ dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) := fun _ =>
add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf A)
have : 0 = dist (Φ p) (Φ p) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ p) := by simp
rw [this]
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 A⟩ p
simp only [glueDist, this, zero_add]
private theorem glueDist_comm (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y = glueDist Φ Ψ ε y x
| .inl _, .inl _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inr _, .inr _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inl _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inl _ => rfl
theorem glueDist_swap (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Ψ Φ ε x.swap y.swap = glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y
| .inl _, .inl _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inl _, .inr _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
| .inr _, .inl _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
theorem le_glueDist_inl_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left <| Real.iInf_nonneg fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
theorem le_glueDist_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr x) (.inl y) := by
rw [glueDist_comm]; apply le_glueDist_inl_inr
section
variable [Nonempty Z]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x : X) (y z : Y) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inr z) := by
simp only [glueDist]
rw [add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ciInf_le_of_le ⟨0, ?_⟩ p ?_
· exact forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
· linarith [dist_triangle_left z (Ψ p) y]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) (x : X) (y : Y) (z : X) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inl z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inl z) := by
simp_rw [glueDist, add_add_add_comm _ ε, add_assoc]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ?_
rw [add_left_comm, add_assoc, ← two_mul]
refine le_ciInf_add fun q => ?_
rw [dist_comm z]
linarith [dist_triangle4 x (Φ p) (Φ q) z, dist_triangle_left (Ψ p) (Ψ q) y, (abs_le.1 (H p q)).2]
private theorem glueDist_triangle (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) :
∀ x y z, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x z ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y + glueDist Φ Ψ ε y z
| .inl _, .inl _, .inl _ => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr _, .inr _, .inr _ => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr x, .inl y, .inl z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr
| .inr x, .inr y, .inl z => by
simpa only [glueDist_comm, add_comm] using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr _ _ _ z y x
| .inl x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simpa only [← glueDist_swap Φ, glueDist_comm, add_comm, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr]
using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr Ψ Φ ε z y x
| .inl _, .inr _, .inr _ => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr ..
| .inl x, .inr y, .inl z => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε H x y z
| .inr x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl
simpa only [abs_sub_comm]
end
private theorem eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∀ p q : X ⊕ Y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε p q = 0 → p = q
| .inl x, .inl y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
| .inl x, .inr y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inl_inr Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inl y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inr y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
theorem Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist (hε : 0 < ε) (s : Set ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y))) :
s ∈ 𝓤 (X ⊕ Y) ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a b, glueDist Φ Ψ ε a b < δ → (a, b) ∈ s := by
simp only [Sum.uniformity, Filter.mem_sup, Filter.mem_map, mem_uniformity_dist, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨δX, δX0, hX⟩, δY, δY0, hY⟩
refine ⟨min (min δX δY) ε, lt_min (lt_min δX0 δY0) hε, ?_⟩
rintro (a | a) (b | b) h <;> simp only [lt_min_iff] at h
· exact hX h.1.1
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inl_inr _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inr_inl _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact hY h.1.2
· rintro ⟨ε, ε0, H⟩
constructor <;> exact ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ h => H _ _ h⟩
/-- Given two maps `Φ` and `Ψ` intro metric spaces `X` and `Y` such that the distances between
`Φ p` and `Φ q`, and between `Ψ p` and `Ψ q`, coincide up to `2 ε` where `ε > 0`, one can almost
glue the two spaces `X` and `Y` along the images of `Φ` and `Ψ`, so that `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are
at distance `ε`. -/
def glueMetricApprox [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) : MetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
dist := glueDist Φ Ψ ε
dist_self := glueDist_self Φ Ψ ε
dist_comm := glueDist_comm Φ Ψ ε
dist_triangle := glueDist_triangle Φ Ψ ε H
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero Φ Ψ ε ε0 _ _
toUniformSpace := Sum.instUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ <| Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist ε0
end ApproxGluing
section Sum
/-!
### Metric on `X ⊕ Y`
A particular case of the previous construction is when one uses basepoints in `X` and `Y` and one
glues only along the basepoints, putting them at distance 1. We give a direct definition of
the distance, without `iInf`, as it is easier to use in applications, and show that it is equal to
the gluing distance defined above to take advantage of the lemmas we have already proved.
-/
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y]
/-- Distance on a disjoint union. There are many (noncanonical) ways to put a distance compatible
with each factor.
If the two spaces are bounded, one can say for instance that each point in the first is at distance
`diam X + diam Y + 1` of each point in the second.
Instead, we choose a construction that works for unbounded spaces, but requires basepoints,
chosen arbitrarily.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1,
arbitrarily, and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
protected def Sum.dist : X ⊕ Y → X ⊕ Y → ℝ
| .inl a, .inl a' => dist a a'
| .inr b, .inr b' => dist b b'
| .inl a, .inr b => dist a (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) b
| .inr b, .inl a => dist b (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) a
theorem Sum.dist_eq_glueDist {p q : X ⊕ Y} (x : X) (y : Y) :
Sum.dist p q =
glueDist (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) 1 p q := by
cases p <;> cases q <;> first |rfl|simp [Sum.dist, glueDist, dist_comm, add_comm,
add_left_comm, add_assoc]
private theorem Sum.dist_comm (x y : X ⊕ Y) : Sum.dist x y = Sum.dist y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [Sum.dist, _root_.dist_comm, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr {x : X} {y : Y} : 1 ≤ Sum.dist (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right dist_nonneg) <|
add_le_add_right (le_add_of_nonneg_left dist_nonneg) _
theorem Sum.one_le_dist_inr_inl {x : X} {y : Y} : 1 ≤ Sum.dist (.inr y) (.inl x) := by
rw [Sum.dist_comm]; exact Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr
private theorem Sum.mem_uniformity (s : Set ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y))) :
s ∈ 𝓤 (X ⊕ Y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ a b, Sum.dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s := by
| constructor
· rintro ⟨hsX, hsY⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Gluing.lean | 236 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp] lemma empty_diffs : ∅ \\ t = ∅ := image₂_empty_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_empty : s \\ ∅ = ∅ := image₂_empty_right
@[simp] lemma diffs_eq_empty : s \\ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_diffs : {a} \\ t = t.image (a \ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_singleton : s \\ {b} = s.image (· \ b) := image₂_singleton_right
lemma singleton_diffs_singleton : ({a} \\ {b} : Finset α) = {a \ b} := image₂_singleton
lemma diffs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \\ t = s₁ \\ t ∪ s₂ \\ t := image₂_union_left
lemma diffs_union_right : s \\ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \\ t₁ ∪ s \\ t₂ := image₂_union_right
lemma diffs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) \\ t ⊆ s₁ \\ t ∩ s₂ \\ t := image₂_inter_subset_left
lemma diffs_inter_subset_right : s \\ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s \\ t₁ ∩ s \\ t₂ := image₂_inter_subset_right
lemma subset_diffs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' \\ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a \ ·)) = s \\ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· \ b)) = s \\ t :=
biUnion_image_right
lemma image_sdiff_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· \ ·)) = s \\ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
lemma diffs_right_comm : s \\ t \\ u = s \\ u \\ t := image₂_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
end Diffs
section Compls
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t : Finset α)
/-- `sᶜˢ` is the finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`. -/
def compls : Finset α → Finset α := map ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] postfix:max "ᶜˢ" => Finset.compls
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_compls : a ∈ sᶜˢ ↔ aᶜ ∈ s := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mem_map' ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩, Embedding.coeFn_mk, compl_compl, compls]
variable (s t)
@[simp] lemma image_compl [DecidableEq α] : s.image compl = sᶜˢ := by simp [compls, map_eq_image]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compls : (↑sᶜˢ : Set α) = compl '' ↑s := coe_map _ _
@[simp] lemma card_compls : #sᶜˢ = #s := card_map _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t}
lemma compl_mem_compls : a ∈ s → aᶜ ∈ sᶜˢ := mem_map_of_mem _
@[simp] lemma compls_subset_compls : s₁ᶜˢ ⊆ s₂ᶜˢ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := map_subset_map
lemma forall_mem_compls {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := forall_mem_map
lemma exists_compls_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_compls (s : Finset α) : sᶜˢᶜˢ = s := by ext; simp
lemma compls_subset_iff : sᶜˢ ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ tᶜˢ := by rw [← compls_subset_compls, compls_compls]
@[simp]
lemma compls_nonempty : sᶜˢ.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := map_nonempty
protected alias ⟨Nonempty.of_compls, Nonempty.compls⟩ := compls_nonempty
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])] Nonempty.compls
@[simp] lemma compls_empty : (∅ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = ∅ := map_empty _
@[simp] lemma compls_eq_empty : sᶜˢ = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := map_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma compls_singleton (a : α) : {a}ᶜˢ = {aᶜ} := map_singleton _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = univ := by ext; simp
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] lemma compls_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∪ tᶜˢ := map_union _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∩ tᶜˢ := map_inter _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_infs (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊼ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊻ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_inf
@[simp] lemma compls_sups (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊻ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊼ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_sup
@[simp] lemma infs_compls_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : s ⊼ tᶜˢ = s \\ t := by
ext; simp [sdiff_eq]; aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_infs_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : sᶜˢ ⊼ t = t \\ s := by
rw [infs_comm, infs_compls_eq_diffs]
@[simp] lemma diffs_compls_eq_infs (s t : Finset α) : s \\ tᶜˢ = s ⊼ t := by
rw [← infs_compls_eq_diffs, compls_compls]
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {n : ℕ}
protected lemma _root_.Set.Sized.compls (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized n) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) :=
Finset.forall_mem_compls.2 <| fun s hs ↦ by rw [Finset.card_compl, h𝒜 hs]
lemma sized_compls (hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized n ↔ (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) where
mp h𝒜 := by simpa using h𝒜.compls
mpr h𝒜 := by simpa only [Nat.sub_sub_self hn] using h𝒜.compls
end Compls
end Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 744 | 745 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.LanguageMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Syntax
This file defines first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories in a style inspired by the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Term` is defined so that `L.Term α` is the type of `L`-terms with free
variables indexed by `α`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Formula` is defined so that `L.Formula α` is the type of `L`-formulas with
free variables indexed by `α`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence` is a formula with no free variables.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.Theory` is a set of sentences.
- The variables of terms and formulas can be relabelled with `FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel`,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel`, and `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.relabel`.
- Given an operation on terms and an operation on relations,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel` gives an operation on formulas.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE` adds more `Fin`-indexed variables.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt` raises the indexes of the `Fin`-indexed variables
above a particular index.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst` and `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.subst` substitute
variables with given terms.
- Language maps can act on syntactic objects with functions such as
`FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onFormula`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv` and
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv` switch terms and formulas between having
constants in the language and having extra variables indexed by the same type.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable (L : Language.{u, v}) {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder
open Structure Fin
/-- A term on `α` is either a variable indexed by an element of `α`
or a function symbol applied to simpler terms. -/
inductive Term (α : Type u') : Type max u u'
| var : α → Term α
| func : ∀ {l : ℕ} (_f : L.Functions l) (_ts : Fin l → Term α), Term α
export Term (var func)
variable {L}
namespace Term
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [∀ n, DecidableEq (L.Functions n)] : DecidableEq (L.Term α)
| .var a, .var b => decidable_of_iff (a = b) <| by simp
| @Term.func _ _ m f xs, @Term.func _ _ n g ys =>
if h : m = n then
letI : DecidableEq (L.Term α) := instDecidableEq
decidable_of_iff (f = h ▸ g ∧ ∀ i : Fin m, xs i = ys (Fin.cast h i)) <| by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
else
.isFalse <| by simp [h]
| .var _, .func _ _ | .func _ _, .var _ => .isFalse <| by simp
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinset [DecidableEq α] : L.Term α → Finset α
| var i => {i}
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinset
/-- The `Finset` of variables from the left side of a sum used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinsetLeft [DecidableEq α] : L.Term (α ⊕ β) → Finset α
| var (Sum.inl i) => {i}
| var (Sum.inr _i) => ∅
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a particular function. -/
@[simp]
def relabel (g : α → β) : L.Term α → L.Term β
| var i => var (g i)
| func f ts => func f fun {i} => (ts i).relabel g
theorem relabel_id (t : L.Term α) : t.relabel id = t := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_id_eq_id : (Term.relabel id : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id :=
funext relabel_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (t : L.Term α) :
(t.relabel f).relabel g = t.relabel (g ∘ f) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_comp_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
(Term.relabel g ∘ Term.relabel f : L.Term α → L.Term γ) = Term.relabel (g ∘ f) :=
funext (relabel_relabel f g)
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a bijection. -/
@[simps]
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) : L.Term α ≃ L.Term β :=
⟨relabel g, relabel g.symm, fun t => by simp, fun t => by simp⟩
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables. -/
def restrictVar [DecidableEq α] : ∀ (t : L.Term α) (_f : t.varFinset → β), L.Term β
| var a, f => var (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i => (ts i).restrictVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => varFinset (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables on the left side of a sum. -/
def restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} :
∀ (t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)) (_f : t.varFinsetLeft → β), L.Term (β ⊕ γ)
| var (Sum.inl a), f => var (Sum.inl (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩))
| var (Sum.inr a), _f => var (Sum.inr a)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i =>
(ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion (subset_biUnion_of_mem
(fun i => varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
end Term
/-- The representation of a constant symbol as a term. -/
def Constants.term (c : L.Constants) : L.Term α :=
func c default
/-- Applies a unary function to a term. -/
def Functions.apply₁ (f : L.Functions 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t]
/-- Applies a binary function to two terms. -/
def Functions.apply₂ (f : L.Functions 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t₁, t₂]
namespace Term
/-- Sends a term with constants to a term with extra variables. -/
@[simp]
def constantsToVars : L[[γ]].Term α → L.Term (γ ⊕ α)
| var a => var (Sum.inr a)
| @func _ _ 0 f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => var (Sum.inl c)
| @func _ _ (_n + 1) f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => isEmptyElim c
/-- Sends a term with extra variables to a term with constants. -/
@[simp]
def varsToConstants : L.Term (γ ⊕ α) → L[[γ]].Term α
| var (Sum.inr a) => var a
| var (Sum.inl c) => Constants.term (Sum.inr c)
| func f ts => func (Sum.inl f) fun i => (ts i).varsToConstants
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
@[simps]
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].Term α ≃ L.Term (γ ⊕ α) :=
⟨constantsToVars, varsToConstants, by
intro t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| @func n f _ ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, Constants.term, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· obtain - | f := f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· exact isEmptyElim f, by
intro t
induction t with
| var x => cases x <;> rfl
| @func n f _ ih => cases n <;> · simp [varsToConstants, constantsToVars, ih]⟩
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquivLeft : L[[γ]].Term (α ⊕ β) ≃ L.Term ((γ ⊕ α) ⊕ β) :=
constantsVarsEquiv.trans (relabelEquiv (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)).symm
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply (t : L[[γ]].Term (α ⊕ β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft t = (constantsToVars t).relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply (t : L.Term ((γ ⊕ α) ⊕ β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft.symm t = varsToConstants (t.relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)) :=
rfl
instance inhabitedOfVar [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨var default⟩
instance inhabitedOfConstant [Inhabited L.Constants] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨(default : L.Constants).term⟩
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a term greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt {n : ℕ} (n' m : ℕ) : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin (n + n'))) :=
relabel (Sum.map id fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n')
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given term with terms. -/
@[simp]
def subst : L.Term α → (α → L.Term β) → L.Term β
| var a, tf => tf a
| func f ts, tf => func f fun i => (ts i).subst tf
end Term
/-- `&n` is notation for the `n`-th free variable of a bounded formula. -/
scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:arg "&" => FirstOrder.Language.Term.var ∘ Sum.inr
namespace LHom
open Term
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language map. -/
@[simp]
def onTerm (φ : L →ᴸ L') : L.Term α → L'.Term α
| var i => var i
| func f ts => func (φ.onFunction f) fun i => onTerm φ (ts i)
@[simp]
theorem id_onTerm : ((LHom.id L).onTerm : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id := by
ext t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp_rw [onTerm, ih]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_onTerm {L'' : Language} (φ : L' →ᴸ L'') (ψ : L →ᴸ L') :
((φ.comp ψ).onTerm : L.Term α → L''.Term α) = φ.onTerm ∘ ψ.onTerm := by
ext t
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp_rw [onTerm, ih]; rfl
end LHom
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def LEquiv.onTerm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Term α ≃ L'.Term α where
toFun := φ.toLHom.onTerm
invFun := φ.invLHom.onTerm
left_inv := by
rw [Function.leftInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.left_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
right_inv := by
rw [Function.rightInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.right_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. Deprecated in favor of `LEquiv.onTerm`. -/
@[deprecated LEquiv.onTerm (since := "2025-03-31")] alias Lequiv.onTerm := LEquiv.onTerm
variable (L) (α)
/-- `BoundedFormula α n` is the type of formulas with free variables indexed by `α` and up to `n`
additional free variables. -/
inductive BoundedFormula : ℕ → Type max u v u'
| falsum {n} : BoundedFormula n
| equal {n} (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| rel {n l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations l) (ts : Fin l → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
/-- The implication between two bounded formulas -/
| imp {n} (f₁ f₂ : BoundedFormula n) : BoundedFormula n
/-- The universal quantifier over bounded formulas -/
| all {n} (f : BoundedFormula (n + 1)) : BoundedFormula n
/-- `Formula α` is the type of formulas with all free variables indexed by `α`. -/
abbrev Formula :=
L.BoundedFormula α 0
/-- A sentence is a formula with no free variables. -/
abbrev Sentence :=
L.Formula Empty
/-- A theory is a set of sentences. -/
abbrev Theory :=
Set L.Sentence
variable {L} {α} {n : ℕ}
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula {l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
L.BoundedFormula α l :=
BoundedFormula.rel R ts
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t]
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t₁, t₂]
/-- The equality of two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Term.bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
BoundedFormula.equal t₁ t₂
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.formula (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
R.boundedFormula fun i => (ts i).relabel Sum.inl
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t]
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t₁, t₂]
/-- The equality of two terms as a first-order formula. -/
def Term.equal (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
(t₁.relabel Sum.inl).bdEqual (t₂.relabel Sum.inl)
namespace BoundedFormula
instance : Inhabited (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
instance : Bot (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
/-- The negation of a bounded formula is also a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def not (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.imp ⊥
/-- Puts an `∃` quantifier on a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.not.all.not
instance : Top (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨BoundedFormula.not ⊥⟩
instance : Min (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.imp g.not).not⟩
instance : Max (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => f.not.imp g⟩
/-- The biimplication between two bounded formulas. -/
protected def iff (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
φ.imp ψ ⊓ ψ.imp φ
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given formula. -/
@[simp]
def freeVarFinset [DecidableEq α] : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → Finset α
| _n, falsum => ∅
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.varFinsetLeft ∪ t₂.varFinsetLeft
| _n, rel _R ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
| _n, imp f₁ f₂ => f₁.freeVarFinset ∪ f₂.freeVarFinset
| _n, all f => f.freeVarFinset
/-- Casts `L.BoundedFormula α m` as `L.BoundedFormula α n`, where `m ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
def castLE : ∀ {m n : ℕ} (_h : m ≤ n), L.BoundedFormula α m → L.BoundedFormula α n
| _m, _n, _h, falsum => falsum
| _m, _n, h, equal t₁ t₂ =>
equal (t₁.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h))) (t₂.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)))
| _m, _n, h, rel R ts => rel R (Term.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)) ∘ ts)
| _m, _n, h, imp f₁ f₂ => (f₁.castLE h).imp (f₂.castLE h)
| _m, _n, h, all f => (f.castLE (add_le_add_right h 1)).all
@[simp]
theorem castLE_rfl {n} (h : n ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : φ.castLE h = φ := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
| rel => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem castLE_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.castLE km).castLE mn = φ.castLE (km.trans mn) := by
revert m n
induction φ with
| falsum => intros; rfl
| equal => simp
| rel =>
intros
simp only [castLE, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq]
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, Term.relabel_comp_relabel]
simp
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => intros; simp only [castLE, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem castLE_comp_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) :
(BoundedFormula.castLE mn ∘ BoundedFormula.castLE km :
L.BoundedFormula α k → L.BoundedFormula α n) =
BoundedFormula.castLE (km.trans mn) :=
funext (castLE_castLE km mn)
/-- Restricts a bounded formula to only use a particular set of free variables. -/
def restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] :
∀ {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (_f : φ.freeVarFinset → β), L.BoundedFormula β n
| _n, falsum, _f => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂, f =>
equal (t₁.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left))
(t₂.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, rel R ts, f =>
rel R fun i => (ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => Term.varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂, f =>
(φ₁.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left)).imp
(φ₂.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, all φ, f => (φ.restrictFreeVar f).all
/-- Places universal quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def alls : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.all.alls
/-- Places existential quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def exs : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.ex.exs
/-- Maps bounded formulas along a map of terms and a map of relations. -/
def mapTermRel {g : ℕ → ℕ} (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (g n))))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(h : ∀ n, L'.BoundedFormula β (g (n + 1)) → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n + 1)) :
∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n)
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => equal (ft _ t₁) (ft _ t₂)
| _n, rel R ts => rel (fr _ R) fun i => ft _ (ts i)
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => (φ₁.mapTermRel ft fr h).imp (φ₂.mapTermRel ft fr h)
| n, all φ => (h n (φ.mapTermRel ft fr h)).all
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a formula greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt : ∀ {n : ℕ} (n' _m : ℕ), L.BoundedFormula α n → L.BoundedFormula α (n + n') :=
fun {_} n' m φ =>
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.liftAt n' m) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc])
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_mapTermRel {L'' : Language}
(ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(ft' : ∀ n, L'.Term (β ⊕ Fin n) → L''.Term (γ ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr' : ∀ n, L'.Relations n → L''.Relations n) {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
((φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).mapTermRel ft' fr' fun _ => id) =
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => ft' _ ∘ ft _) (fun _ => fr' _ ∘ fr _) fun _ => id := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_id_id_id {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => id) (fun _ => id) fun _ => id) = φ := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih3 => simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
/-- An equivalence of bounded formulas given by an equivalence of terms and an equivalence of
relations. -/
@[simps]
def mapTermRelEquiv (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) ≃ L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n ≃ L'.Relations n) {n} : L.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L'.BoundedFormula β n :=
⟨mapTermRel (fun n => ft n) (fun n => fr n) fun _ => id,
mapTermRel (fun n => (ft n).symm) (fun n => (fr n).symm) fun _ => id, fun φ => by simp, fun φ =>
by simp⟩
/-- A function to help relabel the variables in bounded formulas. -/
def relabelAux (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) (k : ℕ) : α ⊕ (Fin k) → β ⊕ (Fin (n + k)) :=
Sum.map id finSumFinEquiv ∘ Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _ ∘ Sum.map g id
@[simp]
theorem sumElim_comp_relabelAux {m : ℕ} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (n + m) → M} : Sum.elim v xs ∘ relabelAux g m =
Sum.elim (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ castAdd m) ∘ g) (xs ∘ natAdd n) := by
ext x
rcases x with x | x
· simp only [BoundedFormula.relabelAux, Function.comp_apply, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
rcases g x with l | r <;> simp
· simp [BoundedFormula.relabelAux]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_elim_comp_relabelAux := sumElim_comp_relabelAux
@[simp]
theorem relabelAux_sumInl (k : ℕ) :
relabelAux (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ (Fin n)) k = Sum.map id (natAdd n) := by
ext x
cases x <;> · simp [relabelAux]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias relabelAux_sum_inl := relabelAux_sumInl
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's variables along a particular function. -/
def relabel (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) : L.BoundedFormula β (n + k) :=
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.relabel (relabelAux g _)) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (ge_of_eq (add_assoc _ _ _))
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's free variables along a bijection. -/
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) {k} : L.BoundedFormula α k ≃ L.BoundedFormula β k :=
mapTermRelEquiv (fun _n => Term.relabelEquiv (g.sumCongr (_root_.Equiv.refl _)))
fun _n => _root_.Equiv.refl _
@[simp]
theorem relabel_falsum (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} :
(falsum : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = falsum :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_bot (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_imp (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.imp ψ).relabel g = (φ.relabel g).imp (ψ.relabel g) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem relabel_not (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
φ.not.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).not := by simp [BoundedFormula.not]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_all (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (k + 1)) :
φ.all.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).all := by
rw [relabel, mapTermRel, relabel]
simp
@[simp]
theorem relabel_ex (g : α → β ⊕ (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (k + 1)) :
φ.ex.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).ex := by simp [BoundedFormula.ex]
@[simp]
theorem relabel_sumInl (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.relabel Sum.inl : L.BoundedFormula α (0 + n)) = φ.castLE (ge_of_eq (zero_add n)) := by
simp only [relabel, relabelAux_sumInl]
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [Fin.natAdd_zero, castLE_of_eq, mapTermRel]
| rel => simp [Fin.natAdd_zero, castLE_of_eq, mapTermRel]; rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp_all [mapTermRel]
| all _ ih3 => simp_all [mapTermRel]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias relabel_sum_inl := relabel_sumInl
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given formula with terms. -/
def subst {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (f : α → L.Term β) : L.BoundedFormula β n :=
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.subst (Sum.elim (Term.relabel Sum.inl ∘ f) (var ∘ Sum.inr)))
(fun _ => id) fun _ => id
/-- A bijection sending formulas with constants to formulas with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].BoundedFormula α n ≃ L.BoundedFormula (γ ⊕ α) n :=
mapTermRelEquiv (fun _ => Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun _ => Equiv.sumEmpty _ _
/-- Turns the extra variables of a bounded formula into free variables. -/
@[simp]
def toFormula : ∀ {n : ℕ}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula (α ⊕ (Fin n))
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.equal t₂
| _n, rel R ts => R.formula ts
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => φ₁.toFormula.imp φ₂.toFormula
| _n, all φ =>
(φ.toFormula.relabel
(Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inl) (Sum.map Sum.inr id ∘ finSumFinEquiv.symm))).all
/-- Take the disjunction of a finite set of formulas -/
noncomputable def iSup [Finite β] (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
let _ := Fintype.ofFinite β
((Finset.univ : Finset β).toList.map f).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥
/-- Take the conjunction of a finite set of formulas -/
noncomputable def iInf [Finite β] (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
let _ := Fintype.ofFinite β
((Finset.univ : Finset β).toList.map f).foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤
end BoundedFormula
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
/-- Maps a bounded formula's symbols along a language map. -/
@[simp]
def onBoundedFormula (g : L →ᴸ L') : ∀ {k : ℕ}, L.BoundedFormula α k → L'.BoundedFormula α k
| _k, falsum => falsum
| _k, equal t₁ t₂ => (g.onTerm t₁).bdEqual (g.onTerm t₂)
| _k, rel R ts => (g.onRelation R).boundedFormula (g.onTerm ∘ ts)
| _k, imp f₁ f₂ => (onBoundedFormula g f₁).imp (onBoundedFormula g f₂)
| _k, all f => (onBoundedFormula g f).all
@[simp]
theorem id_onBoundedFormula :
((LHom.id L).onBoundedFormula : L.BoundedFormula α n → L.BoundedFormula α n) = id := by
ext f
induction f with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => rw [onBoundedFormula, LHom.id_onTerm, id, id, id, Term.bdEqual]
| rel => rw [onBoundedFormula, LHom.id_onTerm]; rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => rw [onBoundedFormula, ih1, ih2, id, id, id]
| all _ ih3 => rw [onBoundedFormula, ih3, id, id]
@[simp]
theorem comp_onBoundedFormula {L'' : Language} (φ : L' →ᴸ L'') (ψ : L →ᴸ L') :
((φ.comp ψ).onBoundedFormula : L.BoundedFormula α n → L''.BoundedFormula α n) =
φ.onBoundedFormula ∘ ψ.onBoundedFormula := by
ext f
induction f with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [Term.bdEqual]
| rel => simp only [onBoundedFormula, comp_onRelation, comp_onTerm, Function.comp_apply]; rfl
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [onBoundedFormula, Function.comp_apply, ih1, ih2, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
| all _ ih3 => simp only [ih3, onBoundedFormula, Function.comp_apply]
/-- Maps a formula's symbols along a language map. -/
def onFormula (g : L →ᴸ L') : L.Formula α → L'.Formula α :=
g.onBoundedFormula
/-- Maps a sentence's symbols along a language map. -/
def onSentence (g : L →ᴸ L') : L.Sentence → L'.Sentence :=
g.onFormula
/-- Maps a theory's symbols along a language map. -/
def onTheory (g : L →ᴸ L') (T : L.Theory) : L'.Theory :=
g.onSentence '' T
@[simp]
theorem mem_onTheory {g : L →ᴸ L'} {T : L.Theory} {φ : L'.Sentence} :
φ ∈ g.onTheory T ↔ ∃ φ₀, φ₀ ∈ T ∧ g.onSentence φ₀ = φ :=
Set.mem_image _ _ _
end LHom
namespace LEquiv
/-- Maps a bounded formula's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def onBoundedFormula (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L'.BoundedFormula α n where
toFun := φ.toLHom.onBoundedFormula
invFun := φ.invLHom.onBoundedFormula
left_inv := by
rw [Function.leftInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onBoundedFormula, φ.left_inv,
LHom.id_onBoundedFormula]
right_inv := by
rw [Function.rightInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onBoundedFormula, φ.right_inv,
LHom.id_onBoundedFormula]
theorem onBoundedFormula_symm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') :
(φ.onBoundedFormula.symm : L'.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L.BoundedFormula α n) =
φ.symm.onBoundedFormula :=
rfl
/-- Maps a formula's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
def onFormula (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Formula α ≃ L'.Formula α :=
φ.onBoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem onFormula_apply (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') :
(φ.onFormula : L.Formula α → L'.Formula α) = φ.toLHom.onFormula :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFormula_symm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') :
(φ.onFormula.symm : L'.Formula α ≃ L.Formula α) = φ.symm.onFormula :=
rfl
/-- Maps a sentence's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps!]
def onSentence (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Sentence ≃ L'.Sentence :=
φ.onFormula
end LEquiv
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] infixl:88 " =' " => FirstOrder.Language.Term.bdEqual
-- input \~- or \simeq
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] infixr:62 " ⟹ " => FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.imp
-- input \==>
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:110 "∀'" => FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.all
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:arg "∼" => FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.not
-- input \~, the ASCII character ~ has too low precedence
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] infixl:61 " ⇔ " => FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.iff
-- input \<=>
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:110 "∃'" => FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.ex
-- input \ex
namespace Formula
/-- Relabels a formula's variables along a particular function. -/
def relabel (g : α → β) : L.Formula α → L.Formula β :=
@BoundedFormula.relabel _ _ _ 0 (Sum.inl ∘ g) 0
/-- The graph of a function as a first-order formula. -/
def graph (f : L.Functions n) : L.Formula (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Term.equal (var 0) (func f fun i => var i.succ)
/-- The negation of a formula. -/
protected nonrec abbrev not (φ : L.Formula α) : L.Formula α :=
φ.not
/-- The implication between formulas, as a formula. -/
protected abbrev imp : L.Formula α → L.Formula α → L.Formula α :=
BoundedFormula.imp
|
variable (β) in
/-- `iAlls f φ` transforms a `L.Formula (α ⊕ β)` into a `L.Formula β` by universally
quantifying over all variables `Sum.inr _`. -/
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Syntax.lean | 743 | 746 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
| fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 54 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.AddAut
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Divisible
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.PathConnected
import Mathlib.Topology.IsLocalHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ZMultiples
/-!
# The additive circle
We define the additive circle `AddCircle p` as the quotient `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`.
See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. For the normed group structure on `AddCircle`, see
`AddCircle.NormedAddCommGroup` in a later file.
## Main definitions and results:
* `AddCircle`: the additive circle `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)` for some period `p : 𝕜`
* `UnitAddCircle`: the special case `ℝ ⧸ ℤ`
* `AddCircle.equivAddCircle`: the rescaling equivalence `AddCircle p ≃+ AddCircle q`
* `AddCircle.equivIco`: the natural equivalence `AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p)`
* `AddCircle.addOrderOf_div_of_gcd_eq_one`: rational points have finite order
* `AddCircle.exists_gcd_eq_one_of_isOfFinAddOrder`: finite-order points are rational
* `AddCircle.homeoIccQuot`: the natural topological equivalence between `AddCircle p` and
`Icc a (a + p)` with its endpoints identified.
* `AddCircle.liftIco_continuous`: if `f : ℝ → B` is continuous, and `f a = f (a + p)` for
some `a`, then there is a continuous function `AddCircle p → B` which agrees with `f` on
`Icc a (a + p)`.
## Implementation notes:
Although the most important case is `𝕜 = ℝ` we wish to support other types of scalars, such as
the rational circle `AddCircle (1 : ℚ)`, and so we set things up more generally.
## TODO
* Link with periodicity
* Lie group structure
* Exponential equivalence to `Circle`
-/
noncomputable section
open AddCommGroup Set Function AddSubgroup TopologicalSpace
open Topology
variable {𝕜 B : Type*}
section Continuity
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
{p : 𝕜} (hp : 0 < p) (a x : 𝕜)
theorem continuous_right_toIcoMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIcoMod hp a) (Ici x) x := by
intro s h
rw [Filter.mem_map, mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter]
haveI : Nontrivial 𝕜 := ⟨⟨0, p, hp.ne⟩⟩
simp_rw [mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨l, u, hxI, hIs⟩ := h
let d := toIcoDiv hp a x • p
have hd := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a x
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨_, ⟨l + d, min (a + p) u + d, ?_, fun x => id⟩, fun y => ?_⟩ <;>
simp_rw [← sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, mem_Ioo, lt_min_iff]
· exact ⟨hxI.1, hd.2, hxI.2⟩
· rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
apply hIs
rw [← toIcoMod_sub_zsmul, (toIcoMod_eq_self _).2]
exacts [⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩, ⟨hd.1.trans (sub_le_sub_right h' _), h.2.1⟩]
theorem continuous_left_toIocMod : ContinuousWithinAt (toIocMod hp a) (Iic x) x := by
rw [(funext fun y => Eq.trans (by rw [neg_neg]) <| toIocMod_neg _ _ _ :
toIocMod hp a = (fun x => p - x) ∘ toIcoMod hp (-a) ∘ Neg.neg)]
exact
(continuous_sub_left _).continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt <|
(continuous_right_toIcoMod _ _ _).comp continuous_neg.continuousWithinAt fun y => neg_le_neg
variable {x}
theorem toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) :
toIcoMod hp a =ᶠ[𝓝 x] toIocMod hp a :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds
(by
rw [Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_Ioo) <|
(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 <| not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples.2 hx
theorem continuousAt_toIcoMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIcoMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨(continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq (h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
h.eq_of_nhds,
continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x⟩
theorem continuousAt_toIocMod (hx : (x : 𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p) ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (toIocMod hp a) x :=
let h := toIcoMod_eventuallyEq_toIocMod hp a hx
continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right.2 <|
⟨continuous_left_toIocMod hp a x,
(continuous_right_toIcoMod hp a x).congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h.symm.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds) h.symm.eq_of_nhds⟩
end Continuity
/-- The "additive circle": `𝕜 ⧸ (ℤ ∙ p)`. See also `Circle` and `Real.angle`. -/
abbrev AddCircle [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜) :=
𝕜 ⧸ zmultiples p
namespace AddCircle
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup 𝕜] (p : 𝕜)
theorem coe_nsmul {n : ℕ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul {n : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} : (↑(n • x) : AddCircle p) = n • (x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_add (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x + y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) + (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_sub (x y : 𝕜) : (↑(x - y) : AddCircle p) = (x : AddCircle p) - (y : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_neg {x : 𝕜} : (↑(-x) : AddCircle p) = -(x : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : 𝕜) = (0 : AddCircle p) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : 𝕜} : (x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • p = x := by
simp [AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
theorem coe_period : (p : AddCircle p) = 0 :=
(QuotientAddGroup.eq_zero_iff p).2 <| mem_zmultiples p
theorem coe_add_period (x : 𝕜) : ((x + p : 𝕜) : AddCircle p) = x := by
rw [coe_add, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', sub_self, coe_period]
@[continuity, nolint unusedArguments]
protected theorem continuous_mk' [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] :
Continuous (QuotientAddGroup.mk' (zmultiples p) : 𝕜 → AddCircle p) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
variable [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedAddMonoid 𝕜]
theorem coe_eq_zero_of_pos_iff (hp : 0 < p) {x : 𝕜} (hx : 0 < x) :
(x : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, n • p = x := by
rw [coe_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
· replace hx : 0 < n := by
contrapose! hx
simpa only [← neg_nonneg, ← zsmul_neg, zsmul_neg'] using zsmul_nonneg hp.le (neg_nonneg.2 hx)
exact ⟨n.toNat, by rw [← natCast_zsmul, Int.toNat_of_nonneg hx.le]⟩
· exact ⟨(n : ℤ), by simp⟩
variable [hp : Fact (0 < p)] (a : 𝕜) [Archimedean 𝕜]
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `[a, a + p)`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIco : AddCircle p ≃ Ico a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out a
/-- The equivalence between `AddCircle p` and the half-open interval `(a, a + p]`, whose inverse
is the natural quotient map. -/
def equivIoc : AddCircle p ≃ Ioc a (a + p) :=
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp.out a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`[a, a + p)`. -/
def liftIco (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIco p a
/-- Given a function on `𝕜`, return the unique function on `AddCircle p` agreeing with `f` on
`(a, a + p]`. -/
def liftIoc (f : 𝕜 → B) : AddCircle p → B :=
restrict _ f ∘ AddCircle.equivIoc p a
variable {p a}
theorem coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico {x y : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) (hy : y ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
(x : AddCircle p) = y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by tauto⟩
suffices (⟨x, hx⟩ : Ico a (a + p)) = ⟨y, hy⟩ by exact Subtype.mk.inj this
apply_fun equivIco p a at h
rw [← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨x, hx⟩, ← (equivIco p a).right_inv ⟨y, hy⟩]
exact h
theorem liftIco_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ico a (a + p)) :
liftIco p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIco p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
rfl
rw [liftIco, comp_apply, this]
rfl
theorem liftIoc_coe_apply {f : 𝕜 → B} {x : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ Ioc a (a + p)) :
liftIoc p a f ↑x = f x := by
have : (equivIoc p a) x = ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
rfl
rw [liftIoc, comp_apply, this]
rfl
lemma eq_coe_Ico (a : AddCircle p) : ∃ b, b ∈ Ico 0 p ∧ ↑b = a := by
let b := QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out 0 a
exact ⟨b.1, by simpa only [zero_add] using b.2,
(QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp.out 0).symm_apply_apply a⟩
lemma coe_eq_zero_iff_of_mem_Ico (ha : a ∈ Ico 0 p) :
(a : AddCircle p) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
have h0 : 0 ∈ Ico 0 (0 + p) := by simpa [zero_add, left_mem_Ico] using hp.out
have ha' : a ∈ Ico 0 (0 + p) := by rwa [zero_add]
rw [← AddCircle.coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico ha' h0, QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero]
variable (p a)
section Continuity
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_equivIco_symm : Continuous (equivIco p a).symm :=
continuous_quotient_mk'.comp continuous_subtype_val
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_equivIoc_symm : Continuous (equivIoc p a).symm :=
continuous_quotient_mk'.comp continuous_subtype_val
variable [OrderTopology 𝕜] {x : AddCircle p}
theorem continuousAt_equivIco (hx : x ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (equivIco p a) x := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [ContinuousAt, Filter.Tendsto, QuotientAddGroup.nhds_eq, Filter.map_map]
exact (continuousAt_toIcoMod hp.out a hx).codRestrict _
theorem continuousAt_equivIoc (hx : x ≠ a) : ContinuousAt (equivIoc p a) x := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [ContinuousAt, Filter.Tendsto, QuotientAddGroup.nhds_eq, Filter.map_map]
exact (continuousAt_toIocMod hp.out a hx).codRestrict _
/-- The quotient map `𝕜 → AddCircle p` as a partial homeomorphism. -/
@[simps] def partialHomeomorphCoe [DiscreteTopology (zmultiples p)] :
PartialHomeomorph 𝕜 (AddCircle p) where
toFun := (↑)
invFun := fun x ↦ equivIco p a x
source := Ioo a (a + p)
target := {↑a}ᶜ
map_source' := by
intro x hx hx'
exact hx.1.ne' ((coe_eq_coe_iff_of_mem_Ico (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx)
(left_mem_Ico.mpr (lt_add_of_pos_right a hp.out))).mp hx')
map_target' := by
intro x hx
exact (eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico (equivIco p a x).2).resolve_left
(hx ∘ ((equivIco p a).symm_apply_apply x).symm.trans ∘ congrArg _)
left_inv' :=
fun x hx ↦ congrArg _ ((equivIco p a).apply_symm_apply ⟨x, Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx⟩)
right_inv' := fun x _ ↦ (equivIco p a).symm_apply_apply x
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
| open_target := isOpen_compl_singleton
continuousOn_toFun := (AddCircle.continuous_mk' p).continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := by
exact continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/AddCircle.lean | 273 | 276 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Miscellaneous lemmas about the integers
This file contains lemmas about integers, which require further imports than
`Data.Int.Basic` or `Data.Int.Order`.
-/
open Nat
namespace Int
theorem le_natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : (m - n : ℤ) ≤ ↑(m - n : ℕ) := by
by_cases h : m ≥ n
· exact le_of_eq (Int.ofNat_sub h).symm
· simp [le_of_not_ge h, ofNat_le]
/-! ### `succ` and `pred` -/
theorem succ_natCast_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : ℤ) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.mpr (by simp)
/-! ### `natAbs` -/
theorem natAbs_eq_iff_sq_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs = b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq
theorem natAbs_lt_iff_sq_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs < b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 < b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt
theorem natAbs_le_iff_sq_le {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs ≤ b.natAbs ↔ a ^ 2 ≤ b ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact natAbs_le_iff_mul_self_le
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = b := by rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ ha hb, ← natAbs_eq_iff_sq_eq]
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg, neg_inj] using
natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonpos {a b : ℤ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ a = -b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg] using natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg ha (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos hb)
theorem natAbs_inj_of_nonpos_of_nonneg {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
natAbs a = natAbs b ↔ -a = b := by
simpa only [Int.natAbs_neg] using natAbs_inj_of_nonneg_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg_of_nonpos ha) hb
/-- A specialization of `abs_sub_le_of_nonneg_of_le` for working with the signed subtraction
of natural numbers. -/
theorem natAbs_coe_sub_coe_le_of_le {a b n : ℕ} (a_le_n : a ≤ n) (b_le_n : b ≤ n) :
natAbs (a - b : ℤ) ≤ n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℤ), natCast_natAbs]
exact abs_sub_le_of_nonneg_of_le (ofNat_nonneg a) (ofNat_le.mpr a_le_n)
(ofNat_nonneg b) (ofNat_le.mpr b_le_n)
| /-- A specialization of `abs_sub_lt_of_nonneg_of_lt` for working with the signed subtraction
of natural numbers. -/
theorem natAbs_coe_sub_coe_lt_of_lt {a b n : ℕ} (a_lt_n : a < n) (b_lt_n : b < n) :
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Lemmas.lean | 75 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion.
We call this `opow` in theorems in order to disambiguate from other exponentials. -/
instance instPow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b ↦ if a = 0 then 1 - b else
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2⟩
private theorem opow_of_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b =
limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ x ↦ x * a) fun o _ f ↦ ⨆ x : Iio o, f x.1 x.2 :=
if_neg h
/-- `0 ^ a = 1` if `a = 0` and `0 ^ a = 0` otherwise. -/
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a :=
if_pos rfl
theorem zero_opow_le (a : Ordinal) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [zero_opow']
exact sub_le_self 1 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero b), mul_zero]
· rw [opow_of_ne_zero h, opow_of_ne_zero h, limitRecOn_succ]
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = ⨆ x : Iio b, a ^ x.1 := by
simp_rw [opow_of_ne_zero ha, limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ hb]
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by
rw [opow_limit a0 h, Ordinal.iSup_le_iff, Subtype.forall]
rfl
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]
simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]
simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero]
| succ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| isLimit b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero => exact h0
| succ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| isLimit b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
@[simp]
theorem opow_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ^ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp
· simp [hb]
· simp [opow_ne_zero b ha, ha]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem opow_natCast (a : Ordinal) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n : Ordinal) = a ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, opow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n IH => rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ, pow_succ, IH]
theorem isNormal_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).lt_iff
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_iff
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_opow a1).inj
theorem isLimit_opow {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(isNormal_opow a1).isLimit
theorem isLimit_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact isLimit_mul (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact isLimit_opow l.one_lt l'
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| succ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| isLimit c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
theorem opow_le_opow {a b c d : Ordinal} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : a ^ b ≤ c ^ d :=
(opow_le_opow_left b hac).trans (opow_le_opow_right hc hbd)
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
rcases le_or_gt a 1 with a1 | a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
theorem left_lt_opow {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a < a ^ b := by
conv_lhs => rw [← opow_one a]
rwa [opow_lt_opow_iff_right ha]
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(isNormal_opow a1).le_apply
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp
| succ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_add_right b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact
(((isNormal_mul_right <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(isNormal_opow a1)).limit_le
l).symm
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 | a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((isNormal_opow a1).trans (isNormal_mul_right (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp +contextual only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
theorem opow_mul_add_pos {b v : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) (u : Ordinal) (hv : v ≠ 0) (w : Ordinal) :
0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb).trans_le <|
(le_mul_left _ <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv).trans <| le_add_right _ _
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : Ordinal} (v : Ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * succ v := by
rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : Ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ succ u := by
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le
(mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _) using 1
exact opow_succ b u
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
/-- The set in the definition of `log` is nonempty. -/
private theorem log_nonempty {b x : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
theorem log_def {b : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) :=
if_pos h
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ 1) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = 0 :=
if_neg h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 := by
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· rw [log_def hb, ← Ordinal.le_zero, pred_le, succ_zero]
apply csInf_le'
rw [mem_setOf, opow_one]
exact bot_lt_of_lt hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
theorem succ_log_def {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
succ (log b x) = sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o } := by
let t := sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }
have : x < b ^ t := csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with (h | h | h)
· refine ((one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx).not_lt ?_).elim
simpa only [h, opow_zero] using this
· rw [show log b x = pred t from log_def hb x, succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h]
· rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_csInf_iff'' (log_nonempty hb)).1 le_rfl a h₂)
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
· rw [succ_log_def hb hx]
exact csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
theorem opow_log_le_self (b : Ordinal) {x : Ordinal} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | b0)
· exact (zero_opow_le _).trans (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with (hb | rfl)
· refine le_of_not_lt fun h => (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le ?_
have := @csInf_le' _ _ { o | x < b ^ o } _ h
rwa [← succ_log_def hb hx] at this
· rwa [one_opow, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `opow_le_iff_le_log'` for a variant assuming `c ≠ 0` rather than `x ≠ 0`. See also
`le_log_of_opow_le` and `opow_le_of_le_log`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x := by
constructor <;>
intro h
· apply le_of_not_lt
intro hn
apply (lt_opow_succ_log_self hb x).not_le <|
((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 <| succ_le_of_lt hn).trans h
· exact ((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 h).trans <| opow_log_le_self b hx
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `opow_le_iff_le_log` for a variant assuming `x ≠ 0` rather than `c ≠ 0`. See also
`le_log_of_opow_le` and `opow_le_of_le_log`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log' {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [log_zero_right, Ordinal.le_zero, Ordinal.le_zero, opow_eq_zero]
simp [hc, (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne']
· exact opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx
theorem le_log_of_opow_le {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ c ≤ x) : c ≤ log b x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [Ordinal.le_zero, opow_eq_zero] at h
exact (zero_lt_one.asymm <| h.1 ▸ hb).elim
· exact (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx).1 h
theorem opow_le_of_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : c ≤ log b x) : b ^ c ≤ x := by
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt b 1
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb] at h
exact (h.not_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hc)).elim
· rwa [opow_le_iff_le_log' hb hc]
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `lt_opow_iff_log_lt'` for a variant assuming `c ≠ 0` rather than `x ≠ 0`. See also
`lt_opow_of_log_lt` and `lt_log_of_lt_opow`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx)
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection.
See `lt_opow_iff_log_lt` for a variant assuming `x ≠ 0` rather than `c ≠ 0`. See also
`lt_opow_of_log_lt` and `lt_log_of_lt_opow`, which are both separate implications under weaker
assumptions. -/
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt' {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hc : c ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log' hb hc)
theorem lt_opow_of_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) : log b x < c → x < b ^ c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le <| le_log_of_opow_le hb
theorem lt_log_of_lt_opow {b x c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c → log b x < c :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le <| opow_le_of_le_log hc
theorem log_pos {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) : 0 < log b o := by
rwa [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb ho, opow_one]
theorem log_eq_zero {b o : Ordinal} (hbo : o < b) : log b o = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o 0 with (rfl | ho)
· exact log_zero_right b
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
· exact log_zero_left o
· exact log_one_left o
· rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← lt_succ_iff, succ_zero, ← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb ho, opow_one]
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right (b : Ordinal) {x y : Ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) : log b x ≤ log b y := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp_rw [log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
· obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact (opow_le_iff_le_log hb (hx.bot_lt.trans_le xy).ne').1 <|
(opow_log_le_self _ hx).trans xy
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
theorem log_le_self (b x : Ordinal) : log b x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· rw [log_zero_right]
· obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact (right_le_opow _ hb).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)
· simp_rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 1 = 0 := by
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 1 b
· exact log_eq_zero hb
· exact log_of_left_le_one hb 1
theorem mod_opow_log_lt_self (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : o % (b ^ log b o) < o := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simpa using Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
· exact (mod_lt _ <| opow_ne_zero _ hb).trans_le (opow_log_le_self _ ho)
theorem log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hbo : b ≤ o) :
log b (o % (b ^ log b o)) < log b o := by
rcases eq_or_ne (o % (b ^ log b o)) 0 with h | h
· rw [h, log_zero_right]
exact log_pos hb (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 (hb.le.trans hbo)) hbo
· rw [← succ_le_iff, succ_log_def hb h]
apply csInf_le'
apply mod_lt
rw [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
theorem log_eq_iff {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : Ordinal) :
| log b x = y ↔ b ^ y ≤ x ∧ x < b ^ succ y := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 439 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Intervals in `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
In this file we prove various lemmas about `Set.image`s and `Set.preimage`s of intervals under
`some : α → WithTop α` and `some : α → WithBot α`.
-/
open Set
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### `WithTop` -/
namespace WithTop
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' {⊤} = (∅ : Set α) :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ => coe_ne_top
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithTop α) = Iio ⊤ := by
ext x
rw [mem_Iio, WithTop.lt_top_iff_ne_top, mem_range, ne_top_iff_exists]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Iio ⊤ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ico a ⊤ = Ici a := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_top : (some : α → WithTop α) ⁻¹' Ioo a ⊤ = Ioi a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioi a = Ioo (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ici a = Ico (a : WithTop α) ⊤ := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iio a = Iio (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Iic a = Iic (a : WithTop α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iic, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top a)]
theorem image_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Icc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ico a b = Ico (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ico, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ico_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
theorem image_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioc a b = Ioc (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self <| Iic_subset_Iio.2 <| coe_lt_top b)]
theorem image_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithTop α) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a : WithTop α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioo, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Iio_self <| Iio_subset_Iio le_top)]
end WithTop
/-! ### `WithBot` -/
namespace WithBot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' {⊥} = (∅ : Set α) :=
@WithTop.preimage_coe_top αᵒᵈ
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
theorem range_coe : range (some : α → WithBot α) = Ioi ⊥ :=
@WithTop.range_coe αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio a :=
ext fun _ => coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => coe_le_coe
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico a b := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo a b := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioi_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioi ⊥ = univ := by
rw [← range_coe, preimage_range]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioc_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioc ⊥ a = Iic a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_Ioo_bot : (some : α → WithBot α) ⁻¹' Ioo ⊥ a = Iio a := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iio : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Iio a = Ioo (⊥ : WithBot α) a := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iio, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]
theorem image_coe_Iic : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Iic a = Ioc (⊥ : WithBot α) a := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Iic, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe, inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem image_coe_Ioi : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ioi a = Ioi (a : WithBot α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ioi_subset_Ioi bot_le)]
theorem image_coe_Ici : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ici a = Ici (a : WithBot α) := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ici_subset_Ioi.2 <| bot_lt_coe a)]
theorem image_coe_Icc : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Icc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 <| bot_lt_coe a)]
theorem image_coe_Ioc : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ioc a b = Ioc (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioc, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Ioi_self <| Ioi_subset_Ioi bot_le)]
theorem image_coe_Ico : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ico a b = Ico (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ico, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
(Subset.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self <| Ici_subset_Ioi.2 <| bot_lt_coe a)]
theorem image_coe_Ioo : (some : α → WithBot α) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a : WithBot α) b := by
rw [← preimage_coe_Ioo, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, range_coe,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioi_self <| Ioi_subset_Ioi bot_le)]
end WithBot
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/WithBotTop.lean | 232 | 234 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,567 | 1,570 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Function TopologicalSpace Topology Set UniformSpace Uniformity
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
theorem cauchy_map_iff' {l : Filter β} [hl : NeBot l] {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans <| and_iff_right hl
theorem Cauchy.mono {f g : Filter α} [hg : NeBot g] (h_c : Cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (Filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
theorem Cauchy.mono' {f g : Filter α} (h_c : Cauchy f) (_ : NeBot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
theorem cauchy_nhds {a : α} : Cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_neBot, nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)⟩
theorem cauchy_pure {a : α} : Cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchy_map {l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma Cauchy.mono_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} (huv : u ≤ v)
(hF : Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F) : Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F :=
⟨hF.1, hF.2.trans huv⟩
lemma cauchy_inf_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u ⊓ v) F ↔
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F ∧ Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [inf_uniformity (u := u), le_inf_iff, and_and_left]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff, forall_and, forall_const]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace' {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
simp_rw [cauchy_iff_le (uniformSpace := _), iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff]
lemma cauchy_comap_uniformSpace {u : UniformSpace β} {α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := comap f u) l ↔ Cauchy (map f l) := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap]
rfl
lemma cauchy_prod_iff [UniformSpace β] {F : Filter (α × β)} :
Cauchy F ↔ Cauchy (map Prod.fst F) ∧ Cauchy (map Prod.snd F) := by
simp_rw [instUniformSpaceProd, ← cauchy_comap_uniformSpace, ← cauchy_inf_uniformSpace]
theorem Cauchy.prod [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} (hf : Cauchy f) (hg : Cauchy g) :
Cauchy (f ×ˢ g) := by
have := hf.1; have := hg.1
simpa [cauchy_prod_iff, hf.1] using ⟨hf, hg⟩
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`SequentiallyComplete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : Filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
intro s hs
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩
apply mem_of_superset t_mem
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact fun z hz => hU (prodMk_mem_compRel hxy (ht <| mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) (adhs : ClusterPt x f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s := (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs
use t, t_mem, ht
exact forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem))
theorem le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ClusterPt x f :=
⟨fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.map [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : UniformContinuous m) : Cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc
map m f ×ˢ map m f = map (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := Filter.prod_map_map_eq
_ ≤ Filter.map (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 α) := map_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := hm⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.comap [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) [NeBot (comap m f)] :
Cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc
comap m f ×ˢ comap m f = comap (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := prod_comap_comap_eq
_ ≤ comap (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 β) := comap_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 α := hm⟩
theorem Cauchy.comap' [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : Filter.comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(_ : NeBot (Filter.comap m f)) : Cauchy (Filter.comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def CauchySeq [Preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
Cauchy (atTop.map u)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_uniformity [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) := by
simpa only [Tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using h.right
theorem CauchySeq.nonempty [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : Nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_neBot _ _ <| (map_neBot_iff _).1 hu.1
theorem CauchySeq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V := by
haveI := h.nonempty
have := h.tendsto_uniformity; rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at this
simpa [MapsTo] using atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchySeq [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) : CauchySeq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
theorem cauchySeq_const [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (x : α) : CauchySeq fun _ : β => x :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchySeq
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans <| by simp only [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
theorem CauchySeq.comp_tendsto {γ} [Preorder β] [SemilatticeSup γ] [Nonempty γ] {f : β → α}
(hf : CauchySeq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) : CauchySeq (f ∘ g) :=
⟨inferInstance, le_trans (prod_le_prod.mpr ⟨Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg, Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg⟩) hf.2⟩
theorem CauchySeq.comp_injective [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] [Nonempty β] {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f : β → ℕ} (hf : Injective f) : CauchySeq (u ∘ f) :=
hu.comp_tendsto <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hf.tendsto_cofinite.mono_left atTop_le_cofinite
theorem Function.Bijective.cauchySeq_comp_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Bijective f) (u : ℕ → α) :
CauchySeq (u ∘ f) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp_injective hf.injective⟩
lift f to ℕ ≃ ℕ using hf
simpa only [Function.comp_def, f.apply_symm_apply] using H.comp_injective f.symm.injective
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto] at hu
exact ((hu.comp <| hf.prod_atTop hg).comp tendsto_atTop_diagonal).subseq_mem hV
-- todo: generalize this and other lemmas to a nonempty semilattice
theorem cauchySeq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, k ∈ Prod.map u u ⁻¹' V :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto
theorem cauchySeq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V := by
simp only [cauchySeq_iff', Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self', mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
|
theorem CauchySeq.prodMap {γ δ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq (Prod.map u v) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 227 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
/-!
# Properties of pointwise scalar multiplication of sets in normed spaces.
We explore the relationships between scalar multiplication of sets in vector spaces, and the norm.
Notably, we express arbitrary balls as rescaling of other balls, and we show that the
multiplication of bounded sets remain bounded.
-/
open Metric Set
open Pointwise Topology
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section SMulZeroClass
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E]
variable [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem ediam_smul_le (c : 𝕜) (s : Set E) : EMetric.diam (c • s) ≤ ‖c‖₊ • EMetric.diam s :=
(lipschitzWith_smul c).ediam_image_le s
end SMulZeroClass
section DivisionRing
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem ediam_smul₀ (c : 𝕜) (s : Set E) : EMetric.diam (c • s) = ‖c‖₊ • EMetric.diam s := by
refine le_antisymm (ediam_smul_le c s) ?_
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
simp [zero_smul_set hs, ← Set.singleton_zero]
· have := (lipschitzWith_smul c⁻¹).ediam_image_le (c • s)
rwa [← smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.smul_def, Set.image_smul, inv_smul_smul₀ hc s, nnnorm_inv,
le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos (nnnorm_pos.2 hc)] at this
theorem diam_smul₀ (c : 𝕜) (x : Set E) : diam (c • x) = ‖c‖ * diam x := by
simp_rw [diam, ediam_smul₀, ENNReal.toReal_smul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm, smul_eq_mul]
theorem infEdist_smul₀ {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
EMetric.infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = ‖c‖₊ • EMetric.infEdist x s := by
simp_rw [EMetric.infEdist]
have : Function.Surjective ((c • ·) : E → E) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective (smul_inv_smul₀ hc)
trans ⨅ (y) (_ : y ∈ s), ‖c‖₊ • edist x y
· refine (this.iInf_congr _ fun y => ?_).symm
simp_rw [smul_mem_smul_set_iff₀ hc, edist_smul₀]
· have : (‖c‖₊ : ENNReal) ≠ 0 := by simp [hc]
simp_rw [ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_iInf_of_ne this ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
theorem infDist_smul₀ {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
Metric.infDist (c • x) (c • s) = ‖c‖ * Metric.infDist x s := by
simp_rw [Metric.infDist, infEdist_smul₀ hc s, ENNReal.toReal_smul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul]
end DivisionRing
variable [NormedField 𝕜]
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem smul_ball {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hc]
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_smul_smul₀ hc x]
simp [← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hc), mul_comm _ r, dist_smul₀]
theorem smul_unitBall {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) : c • ball (0 : E) (1 : ℝ) = ball (0 : E) ‖c‖ := by
rw [_root_.smul_ball hc, smul_zero, mul_one]
theorem smul_sphere' {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
c • sphere x r = sphere (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hc]
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_smul_smul₀ hc x]
simp only [mem_sphere, dist_smul₀, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_iff (norm_pos_iff.2 hc).ne',
mul_comm r]
theorem smul_closedBall' {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
simp only [← ball_union_sphere, Set.smul_set_union, _root_.smul_ball hc, smul_sphere' hc]
theorem set_smul_sphere_zero {s : Set 𝕜} (hs : 0 ∉ s) (r : ℝ) :
s • sphere (0 : E) r = (‖·‖) ⁻¹' ((‖·‖ * r) '' s) :=
calc
s • sphere (0 : E) r = ⋃ c ∈ s, c • sphere (0 : E) r := iUnion_smul_left_image.symm
_ = ⋃ c ∈ s, sphere (0 : E) (‖c‖ * r) := iUnion₂_congr fun c hc ↦ by
rw [smul_sphere' (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc hs), smul_zero]
_ = (‖·‖) ⁻¹' ((‖·‖ * r) '' s) := by ext; simp [eq_comm]
/-- Image of a bounded set in a normed space under scalar multiplication by a constant is
bounded. See also `Bornology.IsBounded.smul` for a similar lemma about an isometric action. -/
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀ {s : Set E} (hs : IsBounded s) (c : 𝕜) : IsBounded (c • s) :=
(lipschitzWith_smul c).isBounded_image hs
/-- If `s` is a bounded set, then for small enough `r`, the set `{x} + r • s` is contained in any
fixed neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset {x : E} {s : Set E} (hs : Bornology.IsBounded s)
{u : Set E} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), {x} + r • s ⊆ u := by
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ closedBall x ε ⊆ u := nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 hu
obtain ⟨R, Rpos, hR⟩ : ∃ R : ℝ, 0 < R ∧ s ⊆ closedBall 0 R := hs.subset_closedBall_lt 0 0
have : Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) (ε / R) ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜) := closedBall_mem_nhds _ (div_pos εpos Rpos)
filter_upwards [this] with r hr
simp only [image_add_left, singleton_add]
intro y hy
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z : E, z ∈ s ∧ r • z = -x + y := by simpa [mem_smul_set] using hy
have I : ‖r • z‖ ≤ ε :=
calc
‖r • z‖ = ‖r‖ * ‖z‖ := norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ε / R * R :=
(mul_le_mul (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.1 hr) (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.1 (hR zs))
(norm_nonneg _) (div_pos εpos Rpos).le)
_ = ε := by field_simp
have : y = x + r • z := by simp only [hz, add_neg_cancel_left]
apply hε
simpa only [this, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall] using I
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {x y z : E} {δ ε : ℝ}
/-- In a real normed space, the image of the unit ball under scalar multiplication by a positive
constant `r` is the ball of radius `r`. -/
theorem smul_unitBall_of_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : r • ball (0 : E) 1 = ball (0 : E) r := by
rw [smul_unitBall hr.ne', Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le]
lemma Ioo_smul_sphere_zero {a b r : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hr : 0 < r) :
Ioo a b • sphere (0 : E) r = ball 0 (b * r) \ closedBall 0 (a * r) := by
have : EqOn (‖·‖) id (Ioo a b) := fun x hx ↦ abs_of_pos (ha.trans_lt hx.1)
rw [set_smul_sphere_zero (by simp [ha.not_lt]), ← image_image (· * r), this.image_eq, image_id,
image_mul_right_Ioo _ _ hr]
ext x; simp [and_comm]
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_eq (x z : E) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
∃ y, dist x y = b * dist x z ∧ dist y z = a * dist x z := by
use a • x + b • z
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul ℝ x]
nth_rw 4 [← one_smul ℝ z]
simp [dist_eq_norm, ← hab, add_smul, ← smul_sub, norm_smul_of_nonneg, ha, hb]
theorem exists_dist_le_le (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (h : dist x z ≤ ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y ≤ δ ∧ dist y z ≤ ε := by
obtain rfl | hε' := hε.eq_or_lt
· exact ⟨z, by rwa [zero_add] at h, (dist_self _).le⟩
have hεδ := add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε' hδ
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε <| add_nonneg hε hδ)
(div_nonneg hδ <| add_nonneg hε hδ) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self hεδ.ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_le_one hεδ] at h
exact ⟨mul_le_of_le_one_left hδ h, mul_le_of_le_one_left hε h⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_le_lt (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 < ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y ≤ δ ∧ dist y z < ε := by
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ)
(div_nonneg hδ <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε hδ).ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_lt_one (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε hδ)] at h
exact ⟨mul_le_of_le_one_left hδ h.le, mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hε h⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_lt_le (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y < δ ∧ dist y z ≤ ε := by
obtain ⟨y, yz, xy⟩ :=
exists_dist_le_lt hε hδ (show dist z x < δ + ε by simpa only [dist_comm, add_comm] using h)
exact ⟨y, by simp [dist_comm x y, dist_comm y z, *]⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_lt_lt (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 < ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y < δ ∧ dist y z < ε := by
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ.le)
(div_nonneg hδ.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ.le) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self (add_pos hε hδ).ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_lt_one (add_pos hε hδ)] at h
exact ⟨mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hδ h, mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hε h⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_ball_ball_iff (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 < ε) :
Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => le_of_not_lt fun hxy => ?_, ball_disjoint_ball⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_lt_lt hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_ball_closedBall_iff (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => le_of_not_lt fun hxy => ?_, ball_disjoint_closedBall⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_lt_le hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_closedBall_ball_iff (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 < ε) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_ball_closedBall_iff hε hδ, add_comm, dist_comm]
theorem disjoint_closedBall_closedBall_iff (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) ↔ δ + ε < dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge fun hxy => ?_, closedBall_disjoint_closedBall⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_le_le hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
open EMetric ENNReal
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_thickening (hδ : 0 < δ) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
infEdist x (thickening δ s) = infEdist x s - ENNReal.ofReal δ := by
obtain hs | hs := lt_or_le (infEdist x s) (ENNReal.ofReal δ)
· rw [infEdist_zero_of_mem, tsub_eq_zero_of_le hs.le]
exact hs
refine (tsub_le_iff_right.2 infEdist_le_infEdist_thickening_add).antisymm' ?_
| refine le_sub_of_add_le_right ofReal_ne_top ?_
refine le_infEdist.2 fun z hz => le_of_forall_lt' fun r h => ?_
cases r with
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Pointwise.lean | 237 | 239 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
/-!
# Limits in concrete categories
In this file, we combine the description of limits in `Types` and the API about
the preservation of products and pullbacks in order to describe these limits in a
concrete category `C`.
If `F : J → C` is a family of objects in `C`, we define a bijection
`Limits.Concrete.productEquiv F : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)`.
Similarly, if `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S` are two morphisms, the elements
in `pullback f₁ f₂` are identified by `Limits.Concrete.pullbackEquiv`
to compatible tuples of elements in `X₁ × X₂`.
Some results are also obtained for the terminal object, binary products,
wide-pullbacks, wide-pushouts, multiequalizers and cokernels.
-/
universe w w' v u t r
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section Products
section ProductEquiv
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type max w v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w v} C FC] {J : Type w} (F : J → C)
[HasProduct F] [PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor F) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)` if `F : J → C` is a family of objects
in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def productEquiv : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j) :=
((PreservesProduct.iso (forget C) F) ≪≫ (Types.productIso.{w, v} fun j => ToType (F j))).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_apply_apply (x : ToType (∏ᶜ F)) (j : J) :
productEquiv F x j = Pi.π F j x :=
congr_fun (piComparison_comp_π (forget C) F j) x
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_symm_apply_π (x : ∀ j, ToType (F j)) (j : J) :
Pi.π F j ((productEquiv F).symm x) = x j := by
rw [← productEquiv_apply_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
end ProductEquiv
section ProductExt
variable {J : Type w} (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] {D : Type t} [Category.{r} D]
variable {FD : D → D → Type*} {DD : D → Type max w r} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (DD X) (DD Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w r} D FD] (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor f) F]
[HasProduct fun j => F.obj (f j)]
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan (forget D)]
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor fun b ↦ F.toPrefunctor.obj (f b)) (forget D)]
lemma Pi.map_ext (x y : ToType (F.obj (∏ᶜ f : C)))
(h : ∀ i, F.map (Pi.π f i) x = F.map (Pi.π f i) y) : x = y := by
apply ConcreteCategory.injective_of_mono_of_preservesPullback (PreservesProduct.iso F f).hom
apply Concrete.limit_ext _ (piComparison F _ x) (piComparison F _ y)
intro ⟨j⟩
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, piComparison_comp_π]
exact h j
end ProductExt
end Products
section Terminal
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves terminals and `X` is terminal, then `ToType X` is a
singleton. -/
noncomputable def uniqueOfTerminalOfPreserves [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : IsTerminal X) : Unique (ToType X) :=
Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X) <| IsTerminal.isTerminalObj (forget C) X h
/-- If `forget C` reflects terminals and `ToType X` is a singleton, then `X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def terminalOfUniqueOfReflects [ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : Unique (ToType X)) : IsTerminal X :=
IsTerminal.isTerminalOfObj (forget C) X <| (Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X)).symm h
/-- The equivalence `IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X)` if the forgetful functor
preserves and reflects terminals. -/
noncomputable def terminalIffUnique [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X) :=
(IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (forget C) X).trans <| Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
variable (C)
variable [HasTerminal C] [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit` when `C` is a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def terminalEquiv : ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit :=
(PreservesTerminal.iso (forget C) ≪≫ Types.terminalIso).toEquiv
noncomputable instance : Unique (ToType (⊤_ C)) where
default := (terminalEquiv C).symm PUnit.unit
uniq _ := (terminalEquiv C).injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end Terminal
section Initial
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves initials and `X` is initial, then `ToType X` is empty. -/
| lemma empty_of_initial_of_preserves [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : Nonempty (IsInitial X)) : IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty]
exact Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialObj (forget C) _) h
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ConcreteCategory.lean | 129 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
/-!
# The mean value inequality and equalities
In this file we prove the following facts:
* `Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le` : if `f` is differentiable on a convex set `s`
and the norm of its derivative is bounded by `C`, then `f` is Lipschitz continuous on `s` with
constant `C`; also a variant in which what is bounded by `C` is the norm of the difference of the
derivative from a fixed linear map. This lemma and its versions are formulated using `RCLike`,
so they work both for real and complex derivatives.
* `image_le_of*`, `image_norm_le_of_*` : several similar lemmas deducing `f x ≤ B x` or
`‖f x‖ ≤ B x` from upper estimates on `f'` or `‖f'‖`, respectively. These lemmas differ by
their assumptions:
* `of_liminf_*` lemmas assume that limit inferior of some ratio is less than `B' x`;
* `of_deriv_right_*`, `of_norm_deriv_right_*` lemmas assume that the right derivative
or its norm is less than `B' x`;
* `of_*_lt_*` lemmas assume a strict inequality whenever `f x = B x` or `‖f x‖ = B x`;
* `of_*_le_*` lemmas assume a non-strict inequality everywhere on `[a, b)`;
* name of a lemma ends with `'` if (1) it assumes that `B` is continuous on `[a, b]`
and has a right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`, and (2) the lemma has
a counterpart assuming that `B` is differentiable everywhere on `ℝ`
* `norm_image_sub_le_*_segment` : if derivative of `f` on `[a, b]` is bounded above
by a constant `C`, then `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * ‖x - a‖`; several versions deal with
right derivative and derivative within `[a, b]` (`HasDerivWithinAt` or `derivWithin`).
* `Convex.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero` : if a function has derivative `0` on a convex set `s`,
then it is a constant on `s`.
* `hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt` : a C^1 function over the reals is
strictly differentiable. (This is a corollary of the mean value inequality.)
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-! ### One-dimensional fencing inequalities -/
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
change Icc a b ⊆ { x | f x ≤ B x }
set s := { x | f x ≤ B x } ∩ Icc a b
have A : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x, B x)) (Icc a b) := hf.prodMk hB
have : IsClosed s := by
simp only [s, inter_comm]
exact A.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed isClosed_Icc OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
apply this.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxB : f x ≤ B x, xab⟩ y hy
rcases hxB.lt_or_eq with hxB | hxB
· -- If `f x < B x`, then all we need is continuity of both sides
refine nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem ?_ (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy))
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc a b] x, f x < B x :=
A x (Ico_subset_Icc_self xab) (IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd) hxB)
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] x, f x < B x := nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem xab) this
exact this.mono fun y => le_of_lt
· rcases exists_between (bound x xab hxB) with ⟨r, hfr, hrB⟩
specialize hf' x xab r hfr
have HB : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, r < slope B x z :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' <| lt_irrefl x).1 (hB' x xab).Ioi_of_Ici
(Ioi_mem_nhds hrB)
obtain ⟨z, hfz, hzB, hz⟩ : ∃ z, slope f x z < r ∧ r < slope B x z ∧ z ∈ Ioc x y :=
hf'.and_eventually (HB.and (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy)) |>.exists
refine ⟨z, ?_, hz⟩
have := (hfz.trans hzB).le
rwa [slope_def_field, slope_def_field, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (sub_pos.2 hz.1), hxB,
sub_le_sub_iff_right] at this
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by `B'`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) {B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
-- `bound` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ B' x`
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, B' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
have Hr : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ r > 0, f x ≤ B x + r * (x - a) := fun x hx r hr => by
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf bound
· rwa [sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
· exact hB.add (continuousOn_const.mul (continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const))
· intro x hx
exact (hB' x hx).add (((hasDerivWithinAt_id x (Ici x)).sub_const a).const_mul r)
· intro x _ _
rw [mul_one]
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 hr
exact hx
intro x hx
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => B x + r * (x - a)) (Ioi 0) 0 :=
continuousWithinAt_const.add (continuousWithinAt_id.mul continuousWithinAt_const)
convert continuousWithinAt_const.closure_le _ this (Hr x hx) using 1 <;> simp
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x ≤ B' x` on `[a, b)`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary hf ha hB hB' fun x hx _ hr =>
(hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le (lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx) hr)
/-! ### Vector-valued functions `f : ℝ → E` -/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope (norm ∘ f) x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) hf' ha hB
hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) ha hB hB'
fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le ((bound x hx).trans_lt hr)
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the right derivative bounded by `C`
satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
let g x := f x - f a
have hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b) := hf.sub continuousOn_const
have hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x := by
intro x hx
simp [g, hf' x hx]
let B x := C * (x - a)
have hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B C x := by
intro x
simpa using (hasDerivAt_const x C).mul ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub (hasDerivAt_const x a))
convert image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary hg hg' _ hB bound
simp only [g, B]; rw [sub_self, norm_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment (fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousWithinAt)
(fun x hx => ?_) bound
exact (hf x <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hx).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hx)
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `derivWithin`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ C) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' ?_ bound
exact fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `derivWithin` version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01 {C : ℝ}
(hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖derivWithin f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
theorem constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero (hcont : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f 0 (Ici x) x) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by
have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ 0 * (x - a) := fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment hcont hderiv (fun _ _ => norm_zero.le) x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using this
theorem constant_of_derivWithin_zero (hdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, derivWithin f (Icc a b) x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by
have H : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [norm_le_zero_iff] using fun x hx => hderiv x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hdiff H x hx
variable {f' g : ℝ → E}
/-- If two continuous functions on `[a, b]` have the same right derivative and are equal at `a`,
then they are equal everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem eq_of_has_deriv_right_eq (derivf : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(derivg : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x) (fcont : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(gcont : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b)) (hi : f a = g a) : ∀ y ∈ Icc a b, f y = g y := by
simp only [← @sub_eq_zero _ _ (f _)] at hi ⊢
exact hi ▸ constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero (fcont.sub gcont) fun y hy => by
simpa only [sub_self] using (derivf y hy).sub (derivg y hy)
/-- If two differentiable functions on `[a, b]` have the same derivative within `[a, b]` everywhere
on `[a, b)` and are equal at `a`, then they are equal everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem eq_of_derivWithin_eq (fdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(gdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ g (Icc a b))
(hderiv : EqOn (derivWithin f (Icc a b)) (derivWithin g (Icc a b)) (Ico a b)) (hi : f a = g a) :
∀ y ∈ Icc a b, f y = g y := by
have A : ∀ y ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Icc a b) y) (Ici y) y := fun y hy =>
(fdiff y (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)).hasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hy)
have B : ∀ y ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (derivWithin g (Icc a b) y) (Ici y) y := fun y hy =>
(gdiff y (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)).hasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hy)
exact eq_of_has_deriv_right_eq A (fun y hy => (hderiv hy).symm ▸ B y hy) fdiff.continuousOn
gdiff.continuousOn hi
end
/-!
### Vector-valued functions `f : E → G`
Theorems in this section work both for real and complex differentiable functions. We use assumptions
`[NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]` to
achieve this result. For the domain `E` we also assume `[NormedSpace ℝ E]` to have a notion
of a `Convex` set. -/
section
namespace Convex
variable {𝕜 G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{f g : E → G} {C : ℝ} {s : Set E} {x y : E} {f' g' : E → E →L[𝕜] G} {φ : E →L[𝕜] G}
instance (priority := 100) : PathConnectedSpace 𝕜 := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
infer_instance
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`, then
the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `HasFDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
letI : NormedSpace ℝ G := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 G
/- By composition with `AffineMap.lineMap x y`, we reduce to a statement for functions defined
on `[0,1]`, for which it is proved in `norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment`.
We just have to check the differentiability of the composition and bounds on its derivative,
which is straightforward but tedious for lack of automation. -/
set g := (AffineMap.lineMap x y : ℝ → E)
have segm : MapsTo g (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ) s := hs.mapsTo_lineMap xs ys
have hD : ∀ t ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1,
HasDerivWithinAt (f ∘ g) (f' (g t) (y - x)) (Icc 0 1) t := fun t ht => by
simpa using ((hf (g t) (segm ht)).restrictScalars ℝ).comp_hasDerivWithinAt _
AffineMap.hasDerivWithinAt_lineMap segm
have bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' (g t) (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := fun t ht =>
le_of_opNorm_le _ (bound _ <| segm <| Ico_subset_Icc_self ht) _
simpa [g] using norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' hD bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `HasFDerivWithinAt` and
`LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖₊ ≤ C)
(hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s := by
rw [lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le]
intro x x_in y y_in
exact hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le hf bound y_in x_in
/-- Let `s` be a convex set in a real normed vector space `E`, let `f : E → G` be a function
differentiable within `s` in a neighborhood of `x : E` with derivative `f'`. Suppose that `f'` is
continuous within `s` at `x`. Then for any number `K : ℝ≥0` larger than `‖f' x‖₊`, `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz on some neighborhood of `x` within `s`. See also
`Convex.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt` for a version that claims
existence of `K` instead of an explicit estimate. -/
theorem exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt (hs : Convex ℝ s)
{f : E → G} (hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y)
(hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x) (K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f' x‖₊ < K) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t := by
obtain ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0,
ball x ε ∩ s ⊆ { y | HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y ∧ ‖f' y‖₊ < K } :=
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 (hder.and <| hcont.nnnorm.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hK))
rw [inter_comm] at hε
refine ⟨s ∩ ball x ε, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ball_mem_nhds _ ε0), ?_⟩
exact
(hs.inter (convex_ball _ _)).lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy => (hε hy).1.mono inter_subset_left) fun y hy => (hε hy).2.le
/-- Let `s` be a convex set in a real normed vector space `E`, let `f : E → G` be a function
differentiable within `s` in a neighborhood of `x : E` with derivative `f'`. Suppose that `f'` is
continuous within `s` at `x`. Then for any number `K : ℝ≥0` larger than `‖f' x‖₊`, `f` is Lipschitz
on some neighborhood of `x` within `s`. See also
`Convex.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt` for a version
with an explicit estimate on the Lipschitz constant. -/
theorem exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt (hs : Convex ℝ s) {f : E → G}
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' y) s y) (hcont : ContinuousWithinAt f' s x) :
∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t :=
(exists_gt _).imp <|
hs.exists_nhdsWithin_lipschitzOnWith_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nnnorm_lt hder hcont
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function within this set is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `fderivWithin` and
`LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`,
then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderiv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderiv_le (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C` on
`s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`. Version with `fderiv` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`, then the function is
`C`-Lipschitz. Version with `fderiv` and `LipschitzWith`. -/
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : E → G}
{C : ℝ≥0} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(bound : ∀ x, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖₊ ≤ C) : LipschitzWith C f := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
rw [← lipschitzOnWith_univ]
exact lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_fderiv_le (fun x _ ↦ hf x) (fun x _ ↦ bound x) convex_univ
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set, using a bound on the difference between
the derivative and a fixed linear map, rather than a bound on the derivative itself. Version with
`HasFDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le'
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x - φ‖ ≤ C)
(hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := by
/- We subtract `φ` to define a new function `g` for which `g' = 0`, for which the previous theorem
applies, `Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le`. Then, we just need to glue
together the pieces, expressing back `f` in terms of `g`. -/
let g y := f y - φ y
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt g (f' x - φ) s x := fun x xs =>
(hf x xs).sub φ.hasFDerivWithinAt
calc
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ = ‖f y - f x - (φ y - φ x)‖ := by simp
_ = ‖f y - φ y - (f x - φ x)‖ := by congr 1; abel
_ = ‖g y - g x‖ := by simp [g]
_ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ := Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le hg bound hs xs ys
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set. Version with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le' (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x - φ‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le' (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt) bound
xs ys
/-- Variant of the mean value inequality on a convex set. Version with `fderiv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderiv_le' (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x - φ‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x - φ (y - x)‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le'
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- If a function has zero Fréchet derivative at every point of a convex set,
then it is a constant on this set. -/
theorem is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y := by
have bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ ≤ 0 := fun x hx => by
simp only [hf' x hx, norm_zero, le_rfl]
simpa only [(dist_eq_norm _ _).symm, zero_mul, dist_le_zero, eq_comm] using
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le hf bound hx hy
theorem _root_.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : E → G}
(hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hf' : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0)
(x y : E) : f x = f y := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
exact convex_univ.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero hf.differentiableOn
(fun x _ => by rw [fderivWithin_univ]; exact hf' x) trivial trivial
/-- If two functions have equal Fréchet derivatives at every point of a convex set, and are equal at
one point in that set, then they are equal on that set. -/
theorem eqOn_of_fderivWithin_eq (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) (hs' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s) (fderivWithin 𝕜 g s)) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g := fun y hy => by
suffices f x - g x = f y - g y by rwa [hfgx, sub_self, eq_comm, sub_eq_zero] at this
refine hs.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hf.sub hg) (fun z hz => ?_) hx hy
rw [fderivWithin_sub (hs' _ hz) (hf _ hz) (hg _ hz), sub_eq_zero, hf' hz]
/-- If `f` has zero derivative on an open set, then `f` is locally constant on `s`. -/
-- TODO: change the spelling once we have `IsLocallyConstantOn`.
theorem _root_.IsOpen.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) (t : Set G) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
refine Metric.isOpen_iff.mpr fun y ⟨hy, hy'⟩ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := Metric.isOpen_iff.mp hs y hy
refine ⟨r, hr, Set.subset_inter h fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
have := (convex_ball y r).is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero (hf.mono h) ?_ hx (mem_ball_self hr)
· simpa [this]
· intro z hz
simpa only [fderivWithin_of_isOpen Metric.isOpen_ball hz] using hf' (h hz)
theorem _root_.isLocallyConstant_of_fderiv_eq_zero (h₁ : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(h₂ : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0) : IsLocallyConstant f := by
simpa using isOpen_univ.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero h₁.differentiableOn fun _ _ ↦ h₂ _
/-- If `f` has zero derivative on a connected open set, then `f` is constant on `s`. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) : ∃ a, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = a := by
obtain (rfl|⟨y, hy⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
· refine ⟨f y, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
have h₁ := hs.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf hf' {f y}
have h₂ := hf.continuousOn.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val (fun x ↦ x.2)
by_contra h₃
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := (isClosed_singleton (x := f y)).preimage h₂
have ht'' : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∈ t ↔ f a ≠ f y := by simpa [Set.ext_iff] using ht'
obtain ⟨z, H₁, H₂, H₃⟩ := hs' _ _ h₁ ht (fun x h ↦ by simp [h, ht'', eq_or_ne]) ⟨y, by simpa⟩
⟨x, by simp [ht'' _ hx, hx, h₃]⟩
exact (ht'' _ H₁).mp H₃ H₂.2
theorem _root_.IsOpen.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) 0) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf hf'
rw [ha x hx, ha y hy]
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq (hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (fderiv 𝕜 f) (fderiv 𝕜 g)) : ∃ a, s.EqOn f (g · + a) := by
simp_rw [Set.EqOn, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
refine hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' (hf.sub hg) fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [fderiv_sub (hf.differentiableAt (hs.mem_nhds hx)) (hg.differentiableAt (hs.mem_nhds hx)),
hf' hx, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- If two functions have equal Fréchet derivatives at every point of a connected open set,
and are equal at one point in that set, then they are equal on that set. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.eqOn_of_fderiv_eq (hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, fderiv 𝕜 f x = fderiv 𝕜 g x) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg hf'
obtain rfl := left_eq_add.mp (hfgx.symm.trans (ha hx))
simpa using ha
theorem _root_.eq_of_fderiv_eq
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f g : E → G}
(hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g)
(hf' : ∀ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x = fderiv 𝕜 g x) (x : E) (hfgx : f x = g x) : f = g := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 E
suffices Set.univ.EqOn f g from funext fun x => this <| mem_univ x
exact convex_univ.eqOn_of_fderivWithin_eq hf.differentiableOn hg.differentiableOn
uniqueDiffOn_univ (fun x _ => by simpa using hf' _) (mem_univ _) hfgx
lemma isLittleO_pow_succ {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ} (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf' : f' =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) :
(fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖ ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hf' ⊢
intro c hc
simp_rw [norm_pow, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, norm_norm]
simp_rw [norm_pow, norm_norm] at hf'
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, segment ℝ x₀ x ⊆ s ∧ ∀ y ∈ segment ℝ x₀ x, ‖f' y‖ ≤ c * ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n := by
have h1 : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, x ∈ s := eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
filter_upwards [h1, hs.eventually_nhdsWithin_segment hx₀s (hf' hc)] with x hxs h
refine ⟨hs.segment_subset hx₀s hxs, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).trans ?_⟩
gcongr
exact norm_sub_le_of_mem_segment hy
filter_upwards [this] with x ⟨h_segment, h⟩
convert (convex_segment x₀ x).norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(f := fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) (y := x) (x := x₀) (s := segment ℝ x₀ x) ?_ h
(left_mem_segment ℝ x₀ x) (right_mem_segment ℝ x₀ x) using 1
· simp
· simp only [hasFDerivWithinAt_sub_const_iff]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hff' x (h_segment hx)).mono h_segment
theorem isLittleO_pow_succ_real {f f' : ℝ → E} {x₀ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {s : Set ℝ}
(hs : Convex ℝ s) (hx₀s : x₀ ∈ s)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (hf' : f' =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ (x - x₀) ^ n) :
(fun x ↦ f x - f x₀) =o[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x ↦ (x - x₀) ^ (n + 1) := by
have h := hs.isLittleO_pow_succ hx₀s hff' ?_ (n := n)
· rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at h ⊢
simpa using h
· rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at hf' ⊢
convert hf' using 4 with c hc x
simp
end Convex
namespace Convex
variable {𝕜 G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{f f' : 𝕜 → G} {s : Set 𝕜} {x y : 𝕜}
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `HasDerivWithinAt`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) : ‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun x hx => le_trans (by simp) (bound x hx)) hs xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `HasDerivWithinAt` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f' x‖₊ ≤ C) :
LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
Convex.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasFDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun x hx => le_trans (by simp) (bound x hx)) hs
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function within
this set is bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `derivWithin` -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_derivWithin_le {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖derivWithin f s x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt) bound xs
ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `derivWithin` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_derivWithin_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hs : Convex ℝ s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖derivWithin f s x‖₊ ≤ C) :
LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le (fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `deriv`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le {C : ℝ} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) (xs : x ∈ s) (ys : y ∈ s) :
‖f y - f x‖ ≤ C * ‖y - x‖ :=
hs.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt) bound xs ys
/-- The mean value theorem on a convex set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is
bounded by `C` on `s`, then the function is `C`-Lipschitz on `s`.
Version with `deriv` and `LipschitzOnWith`. -/
theorem lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖deriv f x‖₊ ≤ C) (hs : Convex ℝ s) : LipschitzOnWith C f s :=
hs.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_hasDerivWithin_le
(fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- The mean value theorem set in dimension 1: if the derivative of a function is bounded by `C`,
then the function is `C`-Lipschitz. Version with `deriv` and `LipschitzWith`. -/
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le {C : ℝ≥0} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f)
(bound : ∀ x, ‖deriv f x‖₊ ≤ C) : LipschitzWith C f :=
lipschitzOnWith_univ.1 <|
convex_univ.lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le (fun x _ => hf x) fun x _ => bound x
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → G`, `𝕜 = R` or `𝕜 = ℂ`, is differentiable everywhere and its derivative equal zero,
then it is a constant function. -/
theorem _root_.is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hf' : ∀ x, deriv f x = 0)
(x y : 𝕜) : f x = f y :=
is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf (fun z => by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf']) _ _
theorem _root_.IsOpen.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) (t : Set G) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hs.isOpen_inter_preimage_of_fderiv_eq_zero hf
(fun x hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx]) t
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) : ∃ a, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = a :=
hs.exists_is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf (fun {x} hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx])
theorem _root_.IsOpen.is_const_of_deriv_eq_zero
(hs : IsOpen s) (hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) 0) {x y : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y :=
hs.is_const_of_fderiv_eq_zero hs' hf (fun a ha ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' ha]) hx hy
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_eq_add_of_deriv_eq {f g : 𝕜 → G} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hs' : IsPreconnected s)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) (deriv g)) : ∃ a, s.EqOn f (g · + a) :=
hs.exists_eq_add_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg (fun x hx ↦ by ext; simp [← deriv_fderiv, hf' hx])
theorem _root_.IsOpen.eqOn_of_deriv_eq {f g : 𝕜 → G} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hs' : IsPreconnected s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s)
(hf' : s.EqOn (deriv f) (deriv g)) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfgx : f x = g x) :
s.EqOn f g :=
hs.eqOn_of_fderiv_eq hs' hf hg (fun _ hx ↦ ContinuousLinearMap.ext_ring (hf' hx)) hx hfgx
end Convex
end
section RCLike
/-!
### Vector-valued functions `f : E → F`. Strict differentiability.
A `C^1` function is strictly differentiable, when the field is `ℝ` or `ℂ`. This follows from the
mean value inequality on balls, which is a particular case of the above results after restricting
the scalars to `ℝ`. Note that it does not make sense to talk of a convex set over `ℂ`, but balls
make sense and are enough. Many formulations of the mean value inequality could be generalized to
balls over `ℝ` or `ℂ`. For now, we only include the ones that we need.
-/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {H : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H] {f : G → H} {f' : G → G →L[𝕜] H} {x : G}
/-- Over the reals or the complexes, a continuously differentiable function is strictly
differentiable. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasFDerivAt f (f' y) y) (hcont : ContinuousAt f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' x) x := by
-- turn little-o definition of strict_fderiv into an epsilon-delta statement
rw [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO, isLittleO_iff]
refine fun c hc => Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball.mpr ?_
-- the correct ε is the modulus of continuity of f'
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.mp (inter_mem hder (hcont <| ball_mem_nhds _ hc)) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
refine ⟨ε, ε0, ?_⟩
-- simplify formulas involving the product E × E
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ h
rw [← ball_prod_same, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq] at h
-- exploit the choice of ε as the modulus of continuity of f'
have hf' : ∀ x' ∈ ball x ε, ‖f' x' - f' x‖ ≤ c := fun x' H' => by
rw [← dist_eq_norm]
exact le_of_lt (hε H').2
-- apply mean value theorem
letI : NormedSpace ℝ G := RestrictScalars.normedSpace ℝ 𝕜 G
refine (convex_ball _ _).norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le' ?_ hf' h.2 h.1
exact fun y hy => (hε hy).1.hasFDerivWithinAt
/-- Over the reals or the complexes, a continuously differentiable function is strictly
differentiable. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_of_hasDerivAt_of_continuousAt {f f' : 𝕜 → G} {x : 𝕜}
(hder : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasDerivAt f (f' y) y) (hcont : ContinuousAt f' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (f' x) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt (hder.mono fun _ hy => hy.hasFDerivAt) <|
(smulRightL 𝕜 𝕜 G 1).continuous.continuousAt.comp hcont
end RCLike
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/MeanValue.lean | 833 | 846 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Full and faithful functors
We define typeclasses `Full` and `Faithful`, decorating functors. These typeclasses
carry no data. However, we also introduce a structure `Functor.FullyFaithful` which
contains the data of the inverse map `(F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) ⟶ (X ⟶ Y)` of the
map induced on morphisms by a functor `F`.
## Main definitions and results
* Use `F.map_injective` to retrieve the fact that `F.map` is injective when `[Faithful F]`.
* Similarly, `F.map_surjective` states that `F.map` is surjective when `[Full F]`.
* Use `F.preimage` to obtain preimages of morphisms when `[Full F]`.
* We prove some basic "cancellation" lemmas for full and/or faithful functors, as well as a
construction for "dividing" a functor by a faithful functor, see `Faithful.div`.
See `CategoryTheory.Equivalence.of_fullyFaithful_ess_surj` for the fact that a functor is an
equivalence if and only if it is fully faithful and essentially surjective.
-/
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] {E : Type*} [Category E]
namespace Functor
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is full if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is surjective. -/
@[stacks 001C]
class Full (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
map_surjective {X Y : C} : Function.Surjective (F.map (X := X) (Y := Y))
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` is faithful if for each `X Y : C`, `F.map` is injective. -/
@[stacks 001C]
class Faithful (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
/-- `F.map` is injective for each `X Y : C`. -/
map_injective : ∀ {X Y : C}, Function.Injective (F.map : (X ⟶ Y) → (F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y)) := by
aesop_cat
variable {X Y : C}
theorem map_injective (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
Function.Injective <| (F.map : (X ⟶ Y) → (F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y)) :=
Faithful.map_injective
lemma map_injective_iff (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.map f = F.map g ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h => F.map_injective h, fun h => by rw [h]⟩
theorem mapIso_injective (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
Function.Injective <| (F.mapIso : (X ≅ Y) → (F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y)) := fun _ _ h =>
Iso.ext (map_injective F (congr_arg Iso.hom h :))
theorem map_surjective (F : C ⥤ D) [Full F] :
Function.Surjective (F.map : (X ⟶ Y) → (F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y)) :=
Full.map_surjective
/-- The choice of a preimage of a morphism under a full functor. -/
noncomputable def preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [Full F] (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
(F.map_surjective f).choose
@[simp]
theorem map_preimage (F : C ⥤ D) [Full F] {X Y : C} (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) :
F.map (preimage F f) = f :=
(F.map_surjective f).choose_spec
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {X Y Z : C}
section
variable [Full F] [F.Faithful]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id : F.preimage (𝟙 (F.obj X)) = 𝟙 X :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_comp (f : F.obj X ⟶ F.obj Y) (g : F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj Z) :
F.preimage (f ≫ g) = F.preimage f ≫ F.preimage g :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_map (f : X ⟶ Y) : F.preimage (F.map f) = f :=
F.map_injective (by simp)
variable (F)
/-- If `F : C ⥤ D` is fully faithful, every isomorphism `F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y` has a preimage. -/
@[simps]
| noncomputable def preimageIso (f : F.obj X ≅ F.obj Y) :
X ≅ Y where
hom := F.preimage f.hom
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Functor/FullyFaithful.lean | 100 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
/-!
# The structure of `Fintype (Fin n)`
This file contains some basic results about the `Fintype` instance for `Fin`,
especially properties of `Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)`.
-/
open List (Vector)
open Finset
open Fintype
namespace Fin
variable {α β : Type*} {n : ℕ}
theorem map_valEmbedding_univ : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).map Fin.valEmbedding = Iio n := by
ext
simp [orderIsoSubtype.symm.surjective.exists, OrderIso.symm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_zero_eq_map : Ioi (0 : Fin n.succ) = univ.map (Fin.succEmb _) :=
coe_injective <| by ext; simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_last_eq_map : Iio (Fin.last n) = Finset.univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb :=
coe_injective <| by ext; simp [lt_def]
theorem Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) : Ioi i.succ = (Ioi i).map (Fin.succEmb _) := by simp
theorem Iio_castSucc (i : Fin n) : Iio (castSucc i) = (Iio i).map Fin.castSuccEmb := by simp
|
theorem card_filter_univ_succ (p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#{x | p x} = if p 0 then #{x | p (.succ x)} + 1 else #{x | p (.succ x)} := by
rw [Fin.univ_succ, filter_cons, apply_ite Finset.card, card_cons, filter_map, card_map]; rfl
theorem card_filter_univ_succ' (p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#{x | p x} = ite (p 0) 1 0 + #{x | p (.succ x)}:= by
rw [card_filter_univ_succ]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
theorem card_filter_univ_eq_vector_get_eq_count [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (v : List.Vector α n) :
#{i | v.get i = a} = v.toList.count a := by
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Fin.lean | 41 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation
/-!
# Positive & negative parts
Mathematical structures possessing an absolute value often also possess a unique decomposition of
elements into "positive" and "negative" parts which are in some sense "disjoint" (e.g. the Jordan
decomposition of a measure).
This file provides instances of `PosPart` and `NegPart`, the positive and negative parts of an
element in a lattice ordered group.
## Main statements
* `posPart_sub_negPart`: Every element `a` can be decomposed into `a⁺ - a⁻`, the difference of its
positive and negative parts.
* `posPart_inf_negPart_eq_zero`: The positive and negative parts are coprime.
## References
* [Birkhoff, Lattice-ordered Groups][birkhoff1942]
* [Bourbaki, Algebra II][bourbaki1981]
* [Fuchs, Partially Ordered Algebraic Systems][fuchs1963]
* [Zaanen, Lectures on "Riesz Spaces"][zaanen1966]
* [Banasiak, Banach Lattices in Applications][banasiak]
## Tags
positive part, negative part
-/
open Function
variable {α : Type*}
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α]
section Group
variable [Group α] {a b : α}
/-- The *positive part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a ⊔ 1`, denoted `a⁺ᵐ`. -/
@[to_additive
"The *positive part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a ⊔ 0`, denoted `a⁺`."]
instance instOneLePart : OneLePart α where
oneLePart a := a ⊔ 1
/-- The *negative part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `a⁻¹ ⊔ 1`, denoted `a⁻ᵐ `.
-/
@[to_additive
"The *negative part* of an element `a` in a lattice ordered group is `(-a) ⊔ 0`, denoted `a⁻`."]
instance instLeOnePart : LeOnePart α where
leOnePart a := a⁻¹ ⊔ 1
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_def (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ⊔ 1 := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_def (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ = a ⊔ 1 := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_mono : Monotone (·⁺ᵐ : α → α) :=
fun _a _b hab ↦ sup_le_sup_right hab _
@[to_additive (attr := simp high)] lemma oneLePart_one : (1 : α)⁺ᵐ = 1 := sup_idem _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_one : (1 : α)⁻ᵐ = 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive posPart_nonneg] lemma one_le_oneLePart (a : α) : 1 ≤ a⁺ᵐ := le_sup_right
@[to_additive negPart_nonneg] lemma one_le_leOnePart (a : α) : 1 ≤ a⁻ᵐ := le_sup_right
-- TODO: `to_additive` guesses `nonposPart`
@[to_additive le_posPart] lemma le_oneLePart (a : α) : a ≤ a⁺ᵐ := le_sup_left
@[to_additive] lemma inv_le_leOnePart (a : α) : a⁻¹ ≤ a⁻ᵐ := le_sup_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_eq_self : a⁺ᵐ = a ↔ 1 ≤ a := sup_eq_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_eq_one : a⁺ᵐ = 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := sup_eq_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, oneLePart_of_one_le⟩ := oneLePart_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, oneLePart_of_le_one⟩ := oneLePart_eq_one
/-- See also `leOnePart_eq_inv`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_eq_neg`."]
lemma leOnePart_eq_inv' : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ↔ 1 ≤ a⁻¹ := sup_eq_left
/-- See also `leOnePart_eq_one`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_eq_zero`."]
lemma leOnePart_eq_one' : a⁻ᵐ = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := sup_eq_right
@[to_additive] lemma oneLePart_le_one : a⁺ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [oneLePart]
/-- See also `leOnePart_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `negPart_nonpos`."]
lemma leOnePart_le_one' : a⁻ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive] lemma leOnePart_le_one : a⁻ᵐ ≤ 1 ↔ a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) posPart_pos] lemma one_lt_oneLePart (ha : 1 < a) : 1 < a⁺ᵐ := by
rwa [oneLePart_eq_self.2 ha.le]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_inv (a : α) : a⁻¹⁺ᵐ = a⁻ᵐ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_inv (a : α) : a⁻¹⁻ᵐ = a⁺ᵐ := by
simp [oneLePart, leOnePart]
section MulLeftMono
variable [MulLeftMono α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_eq_inv : a⁻ᵐ = a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [leOnePart]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma leOnePart_eq_one : a⁻ᵐ = 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [leOnePart_eq_one']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, leOnePart_of_le_one⟩ := leOnePart_eq_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] alias ⟨_, leOnePart_of_one_le⟩ := leOnePart_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp) negPart_pos] lemma one_lt_ltOnePart (ha : a < 1) : 1 < a⁻ᵐ := by
rwa [leOnePart_eq_inv.2 ha.le, one_lt_inv']
-- Bourbaki A.VI.12 Prop 9 a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma oneLePart_div_leOnePart (a : α) : a⁺ᵐ / a⁻ᵐ = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, leOnePart_def, mul_sup, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel,
sup_comm, oneLePart_def]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma leOnePart_div_oneLePart (a : α) : a⁻ᵐ / a⁺ᵐ = a⁻¹ := by
rw [← inv_div, oneLePart_div_leOnePart]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/PosPart.lean | 132 | 132 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
/-!
# Relations holding pairwise
This file develops pairwise relations and defines pairwise disjoint indexed sets.
We also prove many basic facts about `Pairwise`. It is possible that an intermediate file,
with more imports than `Logic.Pairwise` but not importing `Data.Set.Function` would be appropriate
to hold many of these basic facts.
## Main declarations
* `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`: `s.PairwiseDisjoint f` states that images under `f` of distinct elements
of `s` are either equal or `Disjoint`.
## Notes
The spelling `s.PairwiseDisjoint id` is preferred over `s.Pairwise Disjoint` to permit dot notation
on `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`, even though the latter unfolds to something nicer.
-/
open Function Order Set
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*} {r p : α → α → Prop}
section Pairwise
variable {f g : ι → α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem pairwise_on_bool (hr : Symmetric r) {a b : α} :
Pairwise (r on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ r a b := by simpa [Pairwise, Function.onFun] using @hr a b
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on_bool [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
pairwise_on_bool Disjoint.symm
theorem Symmetric.pairwise_on [LinearOrder ι] (hr : Symmetric r) (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → r (f m) (f n) :=
⟨fun h _m _n hmn => h hmn.ne, fun h _m _n hmn => hmn.lt_or_lt.elim (@h _ _) fun h' => hr (h h')⟩
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] [LinearOrder ι] (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → Disjoint (f m) (f n) :=
Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm f
theorem pairwise_disjoint_mono [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] (hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(h : g ≤ f) : Pairwise (Disjoint on g) :=
hs.mono fun i j hij => Disjoint.mono (h i) (h j) hij
theorem Pairwise.disjoint_extend_bot [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ]
{e : α → β} {f : α → γ} (hf : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (he : FactorsThrough f e) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on extend e f ⊥) := by
intro b₁ b₂ hne
rcases em (∃ a₁, e a₁ = b₁) with ⟨a₁, rfl⟩ | hb₁
· rcases em (∃ a₂, e a₂ = b₂) with ⟨a₂, rfl⟩ | hb₂
· simpa only [onFun, he.extend_apply] using hf (ne_of_apply_ne e hne)
· simpa only [onFun, extend_apply' _ _ _ hb₂] using disjoint_bot_right
· simpa only [onFun, extend_apply' _ _ _ hb₁] using disjoint_bot_left
namespace Set
theorem Pairwise.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : s.Pairwise r) : t.Pairwise r :=
fun _x xt _y yt => hs (h xt) (h yt)
theorem Pairwise.mono' (H : r ≤ p) (hr : s.Pairwise r) : s.Pairwise p :=
hr.imp H
theorem pairwise_top (s : Set α) : s.Pairwise ⊤ :=
pairwise_of_forall s _ fun _ _ => trivial
protected theorem Subsingleton.pairwise (h : s.Subsingleton) (r : α → α → Prop) : s.Pairwise r :=
fun _x hx _y hy hne => (hne (h hx hy)).elim
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_empty (r : α → α → Prop) : (∅ : Set α).Pairwise r :=
subsingleton_empty.pairwise r
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_singleton (a : α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Set.Pairwise {a} r :=
subsingleton_singleton.pairwise r
theorem pairwise_iff_of_refl [IsRefl α r] : s.Pairwise r ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → r a b :=
forall₄_congr fun _ _ _ _ => or_iff_not_imp_left.symm.trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp of_eq
alias ⟨Pairwise.of_refl, _⟩ := pairwise_iff_of_refl
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall [IsEquiv α r] {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
constructor
· rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine fun H => ⟨f y, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· apply IsRefl.refl
· exact H hx hy hne
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ x hx y hy _
exact @IsTrans.trans α r _ (f x) z (f y) (hz _ hx) (IsSymm.symm _ _ <| hz _ hy)
/-- For a nonempty set `s`, a function `f` takes pairwise equal values on `s` if and only if
for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `[Nonempty ι]` instead of
`Set.Nonempty s`. -/
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → ι} :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
hs.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
theorem pairwise_iff_exists_forall [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) {r : ι → ι → Prop}
[IsEquiv ι r] : s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· simp
· exact hne.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
/-- A function `f : α → ι` with nonempty codomain takes pairwise equal values on a set `s` if and
only if for some `z` in the codomain, `f` takes value `z` on all `x ∈ s`. See also
`Set.Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq` for a version that assumes `Set.Nonempty s` instead of
`[Nonempty ι]`. -/
theorem pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
pairwise_iff_exists_forall s f
theorem pairwise_union :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔
s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
aesop
theorem pairwise_union_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b :=
pairwise_union.trans <| by simp only [hr.iff, and_self_iff]
theorem pairwise_insert :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by
simp only [insert_eq, pairwise_union, pairwise_singleton, true_and, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
theorem pairwise_insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, r a b ∧ r b a :=
pairwise_insert.trans <|
and_congr_right' <| forall₂_congr fun b hb => by simp [(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha).symm]
protected theorem Pairwise.insert (hs : s.Pairwise r) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r :=
pairwise_insert.2 ⟨hs, h⟩
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Pairwise r) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b ∧ r b a) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_not_mem ha).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
theorem pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b := by
simp only [pairwise_insert, hr.iff a, and_self_iff]
theorem pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (hr : Symmetric r) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, r a b := by
simp only [pairwise_insert_of_not_mem ha, hr.iff a, and_self_iff]
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric (hs : s.Pairwise r) (hr : Symmetric r)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b) : (insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_symmetric hr).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
@[deprecated Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric (since := "2025-03-19")]
theorem Pairwise.insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (hs : s.Pairwise r) (hr : Symmetric r) (ha : a ∉ s)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) : (insert a s).Pairwise r :=
(pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem hr ha).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
theorem pairwise_pair : Set.Pairwise {a, b} r ↔ a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by simp [pairwise_insert]
theorem pairwise_pair_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) : Set.Pairwise {a, b} r ↔ a ≠ b → r a b := by
simp [pairwise_insert_of_symmetric hr]
theorem pairwise_univ : (univ : Set α).Pairwise r ↔ Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Pairwise, mem_univ, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_bot_iff : s.Pairwise (⊥ : α → α → Prop) ↔ (s : Set α).Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h _a ha _b hb => h.eq ha hb id, fun h => h.pairwise _⟩
alias ⟨Pairwise.subsingleton, _⟩ := pairwise_bot_iff
/-- See also `Function.injective_iff_pairwise_ne` -/
lemma injOn_iff_pairwise_ne {s : Set ι} : InjOn f s ↔ s.Pairwise (f · ≠ f ·) := by
simp only [InjOn, Set.Pairwise, not_imp_not]
alias ⟨InjOn.pairwise_ne, _⟩ := injOn_iff_pairwise_ne
protected theorem Pairwise.image {s : Set ι} (h : s.Pairwise (r on f)) : (f '' s).Pairwise r :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy hne ↦ h hx hy <| ne_of_apply_ne _ hne
/-- See also `Set.Pairwise.image`. -/
theorem InjOn.pairwise_image {s : Set ι} (h : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise (r on f) := by
simp +contextual [h.eq_iff, Set.Pairwise]
lemma _root_.Pairwise.range_pairwise (hr : Pairwise (r on f)) : (Set.range f).Pairwise r :=
image_univ ▸ (pairwise_univ.mpr hr).image
end Set
end Pairwise
theorem pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set (s : Set α) (r : α → α → Prop) :
(Pairwise fun (x : s) (y : s) => r x y) ↔ s.Pairwise r := by
simp only [Pairwise, Set.Pairwise, SetCoe.forall, Ne, Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
alias ⟨Pairwise.set_of_subtype, Set.Pairwise.subtype⟩ := pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set
namespace Set
section PartialOrderBot
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {s t : Set ι} {f g : ι → α}
/-- A set is `PairwiseDisjoint` under `f`, if the images of any distinct two elements under `f`
are disjoint.
`s.Pairwise Disjoint` is (definitionally) the same as `s.PairwiseDisjoint id`. We prefer the latter
in order to allow dot notation on `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`, even though the former unfolds more
nicely. -/
def PairwiseDisjoint (s : Set ι) (f : ι → α) : Prop :=
s.Pairwise (Disjoint on f)
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.subset (ht : t.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : s ⊆ t) : s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
Pairwise.mono h ht
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.mono_on (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → g i ≤ f i) :
s.PairwiseDisjoint g := fun _a ha _b hb hab => (hs ha hb hab).mono (h ha) (h hb)
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.mono (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) (h : g ≤ f) : s.PairwiseDisjoint g :=
hs.mono_on fun i _ => h i
@[simp]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_empty : (∅ : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
pairwise_empty _
@[simp]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_singleton (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : PairwiseDisjoint {i} f :=
pairwise_singleton i _
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_insert {i : ι} :
(insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric <| symmetric_disjoint.comap f
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_insert_of_not_mem {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) :
(insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧ ∀ j ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem (symmetric_disjoint.comap f) hi
protected theorem PairwiseDisjoint.insert (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i : ι}
(h : ∀ j ∈ s, i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : (insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
pairwiseDisjoint_insert.2 ⟨hs, h⟩
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.insert_of_not_mem (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s)
(h : ∀ j ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : (insert i s).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
(pairwiseDisjoint_insert_of_not_mem hi).2 ⟨hs, h⟩
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.image_of_le (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {g : ι → ι} (hg : f ∘ g ≤ f) :
(g '' s).PairwiseDisjoint f := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ h
exact (hs ha hb <| ne_of_apply_ne _ h).mono (hg a) (hg b)
theorem InjOn.pairwiseDisjoint_image {g : ι' → ι} {s : Set ι'} (h : s.InjOn g) :
(g '' s).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint (f ∘ g) :=
h.pairwise_image
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.range (g : s → ι) (hg : ∀ i : s, f (g i) ≤ f i)
(ht : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) : (range g).PairwiseDisjoint f := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ hxy
exact ((ht x.2 y.2) fun h => hxy <| congr_arg g <| Subtype.ext h).mono (hg x) (hg y)
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_union :
(s ∪ t).PairwiseDisjoint f ↔
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint f ∧ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ t → i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
pairwise_union_of_symmetric <| symmetric_disjoint.comap f
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.union (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) (ht : t.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ t → i ≠ j → Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : (s ∪ t).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
pairwiseDisjoint_union.2 ⟨hs, ht, h⟩
-- classical
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.elim (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(h : ¬Disjoint (f i) (f j)) : i = j :=
hs.eq hi hj h
lemma PairwiseDisjoint.eq_or_disjoint
(h : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
i = j ∨ Disjoint (f i) (f j) := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
exact h.elim hi hj
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_range_iff {α β : Type*} {f : α → (Set β)} :
(range f).PairwiseDisjoint id ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≠ f y → Disjoint (f x) (f y) := by
aesop (add simp [PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise])
/-- If the range of `f` is pairwise disjoint, then the image of any set `s` under `f` is as well. -/
lemma _root_.Pairwise.pairwiseDisjoint (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (s : Set ι) :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f := h.set_pairwise s
end PartialOrderBot
section SemilatticeInfBot
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {s : Set ι} {f : ι → α}
-- classical
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.elim' (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(h : f i ⊓ f j ≠ ⊥) : i = j :=
(hs.elim hi hj) fun hij => h hij.eq_bot
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.eq_of_le (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(hf : f i ≠ ⊥) (hij : f i ≤ f j) : i = j :=
(hs.elim' hi hj) fun h => hf <| (inf_of_le_left hij).symm.trans h
end SemilatticeInfBot
/-! ### Pairwise disjoint set of sets -/
variable {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'}
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_range_singleton :
(range (singleton : ι → Set ι)).PairwiseDisjoint id :=
Pairwise.range_pairwise fun _ _ => disjoint_singleton.2
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_fiber (f : ι → α) (s : Set α) : s.PairwiseDisjoint fun a => f ⁻¹' {a} :=
fun _a _ _b _ h => disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _i ⟨hia, hib⟩ => h <| (Eq.symm hia).trans hib
-- classical
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.elim_set {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (a : α) (hai : a ∈ f i) (haj : a ∈ f j) : i = j :=
hs.elim hi hj <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨a, hai, haj⟩
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.prod {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι' → Set β} (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(ht : t.PairwiseDisjoint g) :
(s ×ˢ t : Set (ι × ι')).PairwiseDisjoint fun i => f i.1 ×ˢ g i.2 :=
fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨hi, hi'⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨hj, hj'⟩ hij =>
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨hai, hbi⟩ ⟨haj, hbj⟩ =>
hij <| Prod.ext (hs.elim_set hi hj _ hai haj) <| ht.elim_set hi' hj' _ hbi hbj
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_pi {ι' α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (ι' i)} {f : ∀ i, ι' i → Set (α i)}
(hs : ∀ i, (s i).PairwiseDisjoint (f i)) :
((univ : Set ι).pi s).PairwiseDisjoint fun I => (univ : Set ι).pi fun i => f _ (I i) :=
fun _ hI _ hJ hIJ =>
disjoint_left.2 fun a haI haJ =>
hIJ <|
funext fun i =>
(hs i).elim_set (hI i trivial) (hJ i trivial) (a i) (haI i trivial) (haJ i trivial)
/-- The partial images of a binary function `f` whose partial evaluations are injective are pairwise
disjoint iff `f` is injective . -/
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_image_right_iff {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, Injective (f a)) :
(s.PairwiseDisjoint fun a => f a '' t) ↔ (s ×ˢ t).InjOn fun p => f p.1 p.2 := by
refine ⟨fun hs x hx y hy (h : f _ _ = _) => ?_, fun hs x hx y hy h => ?_⟩
· suffices x.1 = y.1 by exact Prod.ext this (hf _ hx.1 <| h.trans <| by rw [this])
refine hs.elim hx.1 hy.1 (not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hx.2, ?_⟩)
rw [h]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hy.2
· refine disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr ?_
rintro _ ⟨⟨a, ha, hab⟩, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact h (congr_arg Prod.fst <| hs (mk_mem_prod hx ha) (mk_mem_prod hy hb) hab)
/-- The partial images of a binary function `f` whose partial evaluations are injective are pairwise
disjoint iff `f` is injective . -/
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_image_left_iff {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ t, Injective fun a => f a b) :
(t.PairwiseDisjoint fun b => (fun a => f a b) '' s) ↔ (s ×ˢ t).InjOn fun p => f p.1 p.2 := by
refine ⟨fun ht x hx y hy (h : f _ _ = _) => ?_, fun ht x hx y hy h => ?_⟩
· suffices x.2 = y.2 by exact Prod.ext (hf _ hx.2 <| h.trans <| by rw [this]) this
refine ht.elim hx.2 hy.2 (not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hx.1, ?_⟩)
rw [h]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hy.1
· refine disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr ?_
rintro _ ⟨⟨a, ha, hab⟩, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact h (congr_arg Prod.snd <| ht (mk_mem_prod ha hx) (mk_mem_prod hb hy) hab)
lemma exists_ne_mem_inter_of_not_pairwiseDisjoint
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ¬ s.PairwiseDisjoint f) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, i ≠ j ∧ ∃ x : α, x ∈ f i ∩ f j := by
change ¬ ∀ i, i ∈ s → ∀ j, j ∈ s → i ≠ j → ∀ t, t ≤ f i → t ≤ f j → t ≤ ⊥ at h
simp only [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨i, hi, j, hj, h_ne, t, hfi, hfj, ht⟩ := h
replace ht : t.Nonempty := by
rwa [le_bot_iff, bot_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at ht
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht
exact ⟨i, hi, j, hj, h_ne, x, hfi hx, hfj hx⟩
lemma exists_lt_mem_inter_of_not_pairwiseDisjoint [LinearOrder ι]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ¬ s.PairwiseDisjoint f) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, i < j ∧ ∃ x, x ∈ f i ∩ f j := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, j, hj, hne, x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := exists_ne_mem_inter_of_not_pairwiseDisjoint h
rcases lt_or_lt_iff_ne.mpr hne with h_lt | h_lt
· exact ⟨i, hi, j, hj, h_lt, x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
· exact ⟨j, hj, i, hi, h_lt, x, hx₂, hx₁⟩
end Set
lemma exists_ne_mem_inter_of_not_pairwise_disjoint
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ¬ Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
∃ i j : ι, i ≠ j ∧ ∃ x, x ∈ f i ∩ f j := by
rw [← pairwise_univ] at h
obtain ⟨i, _hi, j, _hj, h⟩ := exists_ne_mem_inter_of_not_pairwiseDisjoint h
exact ⟨i, j, h⟩
lemma exists_lt_mem_inter_of_not_pairwise_disjoint [LinearOrder ι]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ¬ Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
∃ i j : ι, i < j ∧ ∃ x, x ∈ f i ∩ f j := by
rw [← pairwise_univ] at h
obtain ⟨i, _hi, j, _hj, h⟩ := exists_lt_mem_inter_of_not_pairwiseDisjoint h
exact ⟨i, j, h⟩
theorem pairwise_disjoint_fiber (f : ι → α) : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun a : α => f ⁻¹' {a}) :=
pairwise_univ.1 <| Set.pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f univ
lemma subsingleton_setOf_mem_iff_pairwise_disjoint {f : ι → Set α} :
(∀ a, {i | a ∈ f i}.Subsingleton) ↔ Pairwise (Disjoint on f) :=
⟨fun h _ _ hij ↦ disjoint_left.2 fun a hi hj ↦ hij (h a hi hj),
fun h _ _ hx _ hy ↦ by_contra fun hne ↦ disjoint_left.1 (h hne) hx hy⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pairwise/Basic.lean | 458 | 463 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.List.EditDistance.Defs
/-!
# Lower bounds for Levenshtein distances
We show that there is some suffix `L'` of `L` such
that the Levenshtein distance from `L'` to `M` gives a lower bound
for the Levenshtein distance from `L` to `m :: M`.
This allows us to use the intermediate steps of a Levenshtein distance calculation
to produce lower bounds on the final result.
-/
variable {α β δ : Type*} {C : Levenshtein.Cost α β δ}
[AddCommMonoid δ] [LinearOrder δ] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd δ]
theorem suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_cons (xs : List α) (y ys) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.minimum ≤ levenshtein C xs (y :: ys) := by
induction xs with
| nil =>
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_nil', levenshtein_nil_cons,
List.minimum_singleton, WithTop.coe_le_coe]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_left (by simp)
| cons x xs ih =>
suffices
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.delete x + levenshtein C xs (y :: ys)) ∧
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.insert y + levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys) ∧
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (C.substitute x y + levenshtein C xs ys) by
simpa [suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· calc
_ ≤ (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.minimum := by
simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ ↑(levenshtein C xs (y :: ys)) := ih
_ ≤ _ := by simp
· calc
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys) := by
simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ _ := by simp
· calc
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1.minimum ≤ (levenshtein C xs ys) := by
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst, List.minimum_cons]
apply min_le_of_right_le
cases xs
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_nil']
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_cons₁, List.minimum_cons]
_ ≤ _ := by simp
theorem le_suffixLevenshtein_cons_minimum (xs : List α) (y ys) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.minimum ≤ (suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys)).1.minimum := by
apply List.le_minimum_of_forall_le
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map]
simp only [List.mem_map, List.mem_tails, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro a suff
refine (?_ : _ ≤ _).trans (suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_cons _ _ _)
simp only [suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map]
apply List.le_minimum_of_forall_le
intro b m
replace m : ∃ a_1, a_1 <:+ a ∧ levenshtein C a_1 ys = b := by simpa using m
obtain ⟨a', suff', rfl⟩ := m
apply List.minimum_le_of_mem'
simp only [List.mem_map, List.mem_tails]
suffices ∃ a, a <:+ xs ∧ levenshtein C a ys = levenshtein C a' ys by simpa
exact ⟨a', suff'.trans suff, rfl⟩
theorem le_suffixLevenshtein_append_minimum (xs : List α) (ys₁ ys₂) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys₂).1.minimum ≤ (suffixLevenshtein C xs (ys₁ ++ ys₂)).1.minimum := by
induction ys₁ with
| nil => exact le_refl _
| cons y ys₁ ih => exact ih.trans (le_suffixLevenshtein_cons_minimum _ _ _)
theorem suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_append (xs ys₁ ys₂) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys₂).1.minimum ≤ levenshtein C xs (ys₁ ++ ys₂) := by
cases ys₁ with
| nil => exact List.minimum_le_of_mem' (List.getElem_mem _)
| cons y ys₁ =>
exact (le_suffixLevenshtein_append_minimum _ _ _).trans
(suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_cons _ _ _)
theorem le_levenshtein_cons (xs : List α) (y ys) :
| ∃ xs', xs' <:+ xs ∧ levenshtein C xs' ys ≤ levenshtein C xs (y :: ys) := by
simpa [suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map, List.minimum_le_coe_iff] using
suffixLevenshtein_minimum_le_levenshtein_cons (δ := δ) xs y ys
| Mathlib/Data/List/EditDistance/Bounds.lean | 89 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
|
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 566 | 569 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
/-! The cochain complex of homomorphisms between cochain complexes
If `F` and `G` are cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`) in a preadditive category,
there is a cochain complex of abelian groups whose `0`-cocycles identify to
morphisms `F ⟶ G`. Informally, in degree `n`, this complex shall consist of
cochains of degree `n` from `F` to `G`, i.e. arbitrary families for morphisms
`F.X p ⟶ G.X (p + n)`. This complex shall be denoted `HomComplex F G`.
In order to avoid type theoretic issues, a cochain of degree `n : ℤ`
(i.e. a term of type of `Cochain F G n`) shall be defined here
as the data of a morphism `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` for all triplets
`⟨p, q, hpq⟩` where `p` and `q` are integers and `hpq : p + n = q`.
If `α : Cochain F G n`, we shall define `α.v p q hpq : F.X p ⟶ G.X q`.
We follow the signs conventions appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
namespace CochainComplex
variable {F G K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (n m : ℤ)
namespace HomComplex
/-- A term of type `HomComplex.Triplet n` consists of two integers `p` and `q`
such that `p + n = q`. (This type is introduced so that the instance
`AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n)` defined below can be found automatically.) -/
structure Triplet (n : ℤ) where
/-- a first integer -/
p : ℤ
/-- a second integer -/
q : ℤ
/-- the condition on the two integers -/
hpq : p + n = q
variable (F G)
/-- A cochain of degree `n : ℤ` between to cochain complexes `F` and `G` consists
of a family of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X q` whenever `p + n = q`, i.e. for all
triplets in `HomComplex.Triplet n`. -/
def Cochain := ∀ (T : Triplet n), F.X T.p ⟶ G.X T.q
instance : AddCommGroup (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
instance : Module R (Cochain F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cochain]
infer_instance
namespace Cochain
variable {F G n}
/-- A practical constructor for cochains. -/
def mk (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) : Cochain F G n :=
fun ⟨p, q, hpq⟩ => v p q hpq
/-- The value of a cochain on a triplet `⟨p, q, hpq⟩`. -/
def v (γ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
F.X p ⟶ G.X q := γ ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
@[simp]
lemma mk_v (v : ∀ (p q : ℤ) (_ : p + n = q), F.X p ⟶ G.X q) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(Cochain.mk v).v p q hpq = v p q hpq := rfl
lemma congr_v {z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n} (h : z₁ = z₂) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq := by subst h; rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n)
(h : ∀ (p q hpq), z₁.v p q hpq = z₂.v p q hpq) : z₁ = z₂ := by
funext ⟨p, q, hpq⟩
apply h
@[ext 1100]
lemma ext₀ (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G 0)
(h : ∀ (p : ℤ), z₁.v p p (add_zero p) = z₂.v p p (add_zero p)) : z₁ = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
obtain rfl : q = p := by rw [← hpq, add_zero]
exact h q
@[simp]
lemma zero_v {n : ℤ} (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(0 : Cochain F G n).v p q hpq = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma add_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ + z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq + z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sub_v {n : ℤ} (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁ - z₂).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq - z₂.v p q hpq := rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_v {n : ℤ} (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(-z).v p q hpq = - (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_v {n : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(k • z).v p q hpq = k • (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
/-- A cochain of degree `0` from `F` to `G` can be constructed from a family
of morphisms `F.X p ⟶ G.X p` for all `p : ℤ`. -/
def ofHoms (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) : Cochain F G 0 :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => ψ p ≫ eqToHom (by rw [← hpq, add_zero]))
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p : ℤ) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p p (add_zero p) = ψ p := by
simp only [ofHoms, mk_v, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_zero : ofHoms (fun p => (0 : F.X p ⟶ G.X p)) = 0 := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_v_comp_d (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = ψ p ≫ G.d p q' := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHoms_v (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHoms ψ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ ψ q := by
rw [add_zero] at hpq
subst hpq
rw [ofHoms_v]
/-- The `0`-cochain attached to a morphism of cochain complexes. -/
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cochain F G 0 := ofHoms (fun p => φ.f p)
variable (F G)
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_zero : ofHom (0 : F ⟶ G) = 0 := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, ofHoms_zero]
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p : ℤ) : (ofHom φ).v p p (add_zero p) = φ.f p := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_v_comp_d (φ : F ⟶ G) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
(ofHom φ).v p q hpq ≫ G.d q q' = φ.f p ≫ G.d p q' := by
simp only [ofHom, ofHoms_v_comp_d]
@[simp]
lemma d_comp_ofHom_v (φ : F ⟶ G) (p' p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 0 = q) :
F.d p' p ≫ (ofHom φ).v p q hpq = F.d p' q ≫ φ.f q := by
simp only [ofHom, d_comp_ofHoms_v]
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_add (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ + φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_sub (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (φ₁ - φ₂) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_neg (φ : F ⟶ G) :
Cochain.ofHom (-φ) = -Cochain.ofHom φ := by aesop_cat
/-- The cochain of degree `-1` given by an homotopy between two morphism of complexes. -/
def ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (ho : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) : Cochain F G (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => ho.hom p q)
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_ofEq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.ofEq h) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma ofHomotopy_refl (φ : F ⟶ G) :
ofHomotopy (Homotopy.refl φ) = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q = q') :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').hom = γ.v p q' (by rw [← hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma v_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv
(γ : Cochain F G n) (p q q' : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (hq' : q' = q) :
γ.v p q hpq ≫ (HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq G hq').inv = γ.v p q' (by rw [hq', hpq]) := by
subst hq'
simp only [HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id]
/-- The composition of cochains. -/
def comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
Cochain F K n₁₂ :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z₁.v p (p + n₁) rfl ≫ z₂.v (p + n₁) q (by omega))
/-! If `z₁` is a cochain of degree `n₁` and `z₂` is a cochain of degree `n₂`, and that
we have a relation `h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂`, then `z₁.comp z₂ h` is a cochain of degree `n₁₂`.
The following lemma `comp_v` computes the value of this composition `z₁.comp z₂ h`
on a triplet `⟨p₁, p₃, _⟩` (with `p₁ + n₁₂ = p₃`). In order to use this lemma,
we need to provide an intermediate integer `p₂` such that `p₁ + n₁ = p₂`.
It is advisable to use a `p₂` that has good definitional properties
(i.e. `p₁ + n₁` is not always the best choice.)
When `z₁` or `z₂` is a `0`-cochain, there is a better choice of `p₂`, and this leads
to the two simplification lemmas `comp_zero_cochain_v` and `zero_cochain_comp_v`.
-/
lemma comp_v {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁ : p₁ + n₁ = p₂) (h₂ : p₂ + n₂ = p₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h).v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc]) =
z₁.v p₁ p₂ h₁ ≫ z₂.v p₂ p₃ h₂ := by
subst h₁; rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_zero_cochain_v (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p q hpq ≫ z₂.v q q (add_zero q) :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (add_zero n) p q q hpq (add_zero q)
@[simp]
lemma zero_cochain_comp_v (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n)).v p q hpq = z₁.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ z₂.v p q hpq :=
comp_v z₁ z₂ (zero_add n) p p q (add_zero p) hpq
/-- The associativity of the composition of cochains. -/
lemma comp_assoc {n₁ n₂ n₃ n₁₂ n₂₃ n₁₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) (h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) (h₁₂₃ : n₁ + n₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (show n₁₂ + n₃ = n₁₂₃ by rw [← h₁₂, h₁₂₃]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂₃, add_assoc]) := by
substs h₁₂ h₂₃ h₁₂₃
ext p q hpq
rw [comp_v _ _ rfl p (p + n₁ + n₂) q (add_assoc _ _ _).symm (by omega),
comp_v z₁ z₂ rfl p (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₁ (z₂.comp z₃ rfl) (add_assoc n₁ n₂ n₃).symm p (p + n₁) q (by omega) (by omega),
comp_v z₂ z₃ rfl (p + n₁) (p + n₁ + n₂) q (by omega) (by omega), assoc]
/-! The formulation of the associativity of the composition of cochains given by the
lemma `comp_assoc` often requires a careful selection of degrees with good definitional
properties. In a few cases, like when one of the three cochains is a `0`-cochain,
there are better choices, which provides the following simplification lemmas. -/
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain {n₂ n₃ n₂₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃)
(h₂₃ : n₂ + n₃ = n₂₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)).comp z₃ h₂₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ h₂₃) (zero_add n₂₃) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₃ n₁₃ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₃) (h₁₃ : n₁ + n₃ = n₁₃) :
(z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)).comp z₃ h₁₃ = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (zero_add n₃)) h₁₃ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_third_is_zero_cochain {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (z₃ : Cochain K L 0) (h₁₂ : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃ (add_zero n₁₂) = z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (add_zero n₂)) h₁₂ :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
lemma comp_assoc_of_second_degree_eq_neg_third_degree {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ}
(z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K (-n₂)) (z₃ : Cochain K L n₂) (h₁₂ : n₁ + (-n₂) = n₁₂) :
(z₁.comp z₂ h₁₂).comp z₃
(show n₁₂ + n₂ = n₁ by rw [← h₁₂, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]) =
z₁.comp (z₂.comp z₃ (neg_add_cancel n₂)) (add_zero n₁) :=
comp_assoc _ _ _ _ _ (by omega)
@[simp]
protected lemma zero_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (0 : Cochain F G n₁).comp z₂ h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, zero_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma add_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ + z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma sub_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ z₁' : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (z₁ - z₁').comp z₂ h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁'.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, sub_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma neg_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (-z₁).comp z₂ h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, neg_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : R) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simp]
lemma units_smul_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (k : Rˣ) (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : (k • z₁).comp z₂ h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.smul_comp
@[simp]
protected lemma id_comp {n : ℤ} (z₂ : Cochain F G n) :
(Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F)).comp z₂ (zero_add n) = z₂ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [zero_cochain_comp_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_zero {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (0 : Cochain G K n₂) h = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), zero_v, comp_zero]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_add {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ + z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h + z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), add_v, comp_add]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_sub {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ z₂' : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (z₂ - z₂') h = z₁.comp z₂ h - z₁.comp z₂' h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), sub_v, comp_sub]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_neg {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) : z₁.comp (-z₂) h = -z₁.comp z₂ h := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), neg_v, comp_neg]
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : R) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_v _ _ h p _ q rfl (by omega), smul_v, Linear.comp_smul]
@[simp]
lemma comp_units_smul {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (k : Rˣ) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂ ) : z₁.comp (k • z₂) h = k • (z₁.comp z₂ h) := by
apply Cochain.comp_smul
@[simp]
protected lemma comp_id {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) :
z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G)) (add_zero n) = z₁ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [comp_zero_cochain_v, ofHom_v, HomologicalComplex.id_f, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_comp (φ : ∀ (p : ℤ), F.X p ⟶ G.X p) (ψ : ∀ (p : ℤ), G.X p ⟶ K.X p) :
(ofHoms φ).comp (ofHoms ψ) (zero_add 0) = ofHoms (fun p => φ p ≫ ψ p) := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_comp (f : F ⟶ G) (g : G ⟶ K) :
ofHom (f ≫ g) = (ofHom f).comp (ofHom g) (zero_add 0) := by
simp only [ofHom, HomologicalComplex.comp_f, ofHoms_comp]
variable (K)
/-- The differential on a cochain complex, as a cochain of degree `1`. -/
def diff : Cochain K K 1 := Cochain.mk (fun p q _ => K.d p q)
@[simp]
lemma diff_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) : (diff K).v p q hpq = K.d p q := rfl
end Cochain
variable {F G}
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes. -/
def δ (z : Cochain F G n) : Cochain F G m :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => z.v p (p + n) rfl ≫ G.d (p + n) q +
m.negOnePow • F.d p (p + m - n) ≫ z.v (p + m - n) q (by rw [hpq, sub_add_cancel]))
/-! Similarly as for the composition of cochains, if `z : Cochain F G n`,
we usually need to carefully select intermediate indices with
good definitional properties in order to obtain a suitable expansion of the
morphisms which constitute `δ n m z : Cochain F G m` (when `n + 1 = m`, otherwise
it shall be zero). The basic equational lemma is `δ_v` below. -/
lemma δ_v (hnm : n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + m = q) (q₁ q₂ : ℤ)
(hq₁ : q₁ = q - 1) (hq₂ : p + 1 = q₂) : (δ n m z).v p q hpq =
z.v p q₁ (by rw [hq₁, ← hpq, ← hnm, ← add_assoc, add_sub_cancel_right]) ≫ G.d q₁ q
+ m.negOnePow • F.d p q₂ ≫ z.v q₂ q
(by rw [← hq₂, add_assoc, add_comm 1, hnm, hpq]) := by
obtain rfl : q₁ = p + n := by omega
obtain rfl : q₂ = p + m - n := by omega
rfl
lemma δ_shape (hnm : ¬ n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m z = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp only [δ]
rw [Cochain.mk_v, Cochain.zero_v, F.shape, G.shape, comp_zero, zero_add, zero_comp, smul_zero]
all_goals
simp only [ComplexShape.up_Rel]
exact fun _ => hnm (by omega)
variable (F G) (R)
/-- The differential on the complex of morphisms between cochain complexes, as a linear map. -/
@[simps!]
def δ_hom : Cochain F G n →ₗ[R] Cochain F G m where
toFun := δ n m
map_add' α β := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.add_v, add_comp, comp_add, smul_add]
abel
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, add_zero]
map_smul' r a := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n m h _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.smul_v, Linear.comp_smul,
Linear.smul_comp, smul_add, add_right_inj, smul_comm m.negOnePow r]
· simp only [δ_shape _ _ h, smul_zero]
variable {F G R}
@[simp] lemma δ_add (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ + z₂) = δ n m z₁ + δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_add z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_sub (z₁ z₂ : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (z₁ - z₂) = δ n m z₁ - δ n m z₂ :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_sub z₁ z₂
@[simp] lemma δ_zero : δ n m (0 : Cochain F G n) = 0 := (δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_zero
@[simp] lemma δ_neg (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (-z) = - δ n m z :=
(δ_hom ℤ F G n m).map_neg z
@[simp] lemma δ_smul (k : R) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
(δ_hom R F G n m).map_smul k z
@[simp] lemma δ_units_smul (k : Rˣ) (z : Cochain F G n) : δ n m (k • z) = k • δ n m z :=
δ_smul ..
lemma δ_δ (n₀ n₁ n₂ : ℤ) (z : Cochain F G n₀) : δ n₁ n₂ (δ n₀ n₁ z) = 0 := by
by_cases h₁₂ : n₁ + 1 = n₂; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₁₂]
by_cases h₀₁ : n₀ + 1 = n₁; swap
· rw [δ_shape _ _ h₀₁, δ_zero]
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [δ_v n₁ n₂ h₁₂ _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z p (q-1) (by omega) (q-2) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₀ n₁ h₀₁ z (p+1) q (by omega) _ (p+2) rfl (by omega),
← h₁₂, Int.negOnePow_succ, add_comp, assoc,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, comp_zero, zero_add, comp_add,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero,
add_zero, add_neg_cancel, Units.neg_smul,
Linear.units_smul_comp, Linear.comp_units_smul]
lemma δ_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
(m₁ m₂ m₁₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : n₁₂ + 1 = m₁₂) (h₁ : n₁ + 1 = m₁) (h₂ : n₂ + 1 = m₂) :
δ n₁₂ m₁₂ (z₁.comp z₂ h) = z₁.comp (δ n₂ m₂ z₂) (by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₂, ← h, add_assoc]) +
n₂.negOnePow • (δ n₁ m₁ z₁).comp z₂
(by rw [← h₁₂, ← h₁, ← h, add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc]) := by
subst h₁₂ h₁ h₂ h
ext p q hpq
dsimp
rw [z₁.comp_v _ (add_assoc n₁ n₂ 1).symm p _ q rfl (by omega),
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show n₁ + 1 + n₂ = n₁ + n₂ + 1 by omega) p (p+n₁+1) q
(by omega) (by omega),
δ_v (n₁ + n₂) _ rfl (z₁.comp z₂ rfl) p q hpq (p + n₁ + n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl p _ _ rfl rfl,
z₁.comp_v z₂ rfl (p+1) (p+n₁+1) q (by omega) (by omega),
δ_v n₂ (n₂+1) rfl z₂ (p+n₁) q (by omega) (p+n₁+n₂) _ (by omega) rfl,
δ_v n₁ (n₁+1) rfl z₁ p (p+n₁+1) (by omega) (p+n₁) _ (by omega) rfl]
simp only [assoc, comp_add, add_comp, Int.negOnePow_succ, Int.negOnePow_add n₁ n₂,
Units.neg_smul, comp_neg, neg_comp, smul_neg, smul_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp,
mul_comm n₁.negOnePow n₂.negOnePow, Linear.comp_units_smul, smul_add]
abel
lemma δ_zero_cochain_comp {n₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂)
(m₂ : ℤ) (h₂ : n₂ + 1 = m₂) :
δ n₂ m₂ (z₁.comp z₂ (zero_add n₂)) =
z₁.comp (δ n₂ m₂ z₂) (zero_add m₂) +
n₂.negOnePow • ((δ 0 1 z₁).comp z₂ (by rw [add_comm, h₂])) :=
δ_comp z₁ z₂ (zero_add n₂) 1 m₂ m₂ h₂ (zero_add 1) h₂
lemma δ_comp_zero_cochain {n₁ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K 0)
(m₁ : ℤ) (h₁ : n₁ + 1 = m₁) :
δ n₁ m₁ (z₁.comp z₂ (add_zero n₁)) =
z₁.comp (δ 0 1 z₂) h₁ + (δ n₁ m₁ z₁).comp z₂ (add_zero m₁) := by
simp only [δ_comp z₁ z₂ (add_zero n₁) m₁ 1 m₁ h₁ h₁ (zero_add 1), one_smul,
Int.negOnePow_zero]
@[simp]
lemma δ_zero_cochain_v (z : Cochain F G 0) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(δ 0 1 z).v p q hpq = z.v p p (add_zero p) ≫ G.d p q - F.d p q ≫ z.v q q (add_zero q) := by
simp only [δ_v 0 1 (zero_add 1) z p q hpq p q (by omega) hpq, zero_add,
Int.negOnePow_one, Units.neg_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHom {p : ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G) : δ 0 p (Cochain.ofHom φ) = 0 := by
by_cases h : p = 1
· subst h
ext
simp
· rw [δ_shape]
omega
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHomotopy {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : Homotopy φ₁ φ₂) :
δ (-1) 0 (Cochain.ofHomotopy h) = Cochain.ofHom φ₁ - Cochain.ofHom φ₂ := by
ext p
have eq := h.comm p
rw [dNext_eq h.hom (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p+1) by simp),
prevD_eq h.hom (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p-1) p by simp)] at eq
rw [Cochain.ofHomotopy, δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) _ p p (add_zero p) (p-1) (p+1) rfl rfl]
simp only [Cochain.mk_v, neg_add_cancel, one_smul, Int.negOnePow_zero,
Cochain.sub_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, eq]
abel
lemma δ_neg_one_cochain (z : Cochain F G (-1)) :
δ (-1) 0 z = Cochain.ofHom (Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
(fun i j hij => z.v i j (by dsimp at hij; rw [← hij, add_neg_cancel_right]))) := by
ext p
rw [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) _ p p (add_zero p) (p-1) (p+1) rfl rfl]
simp only [neg_add_cancel, one_smul, Cochain.ofHom_v, Int.negOnePow_zero]
rw [Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f (show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p-1) p by simp)
(show (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p+1) by simp)]
abel
end HomComplex
variable (F G)
open HomComplex
/-- The cochain complex of homomorphisms between two cochain complexes `F` and `G`.
In degree `n : ℤ`, it consists of the abelian group `HomComplex.Cochain F G n`. -/
@[simps! X d_hom_apply]
def HomComplex : CochainComplex AddCommGrp ℤ where
X i := AddCommGrp.of (Cochain F G i)
d i j := AddCommGrp.ofHom (δ_hom ℤ F G i j)
shape _ _ hij := by ext; simp [δ_shape _ _ hij]
d_comp_d' _ _ _ _ _ := by ext; simp [δ_δ]
namespace HomComplex
/-- The subgroup of cocycles in `Cochain F G n`. -/
def cocycle : AddSubgroup (Cochain F G n) :=
AddMonoidHom.ker (δ_hom ℤ F G n (n + 1)).toAddMonoidHom
/-- The type of `n`-cocycles, as a subtype of `Cochain F G n`. -/
def Cocycle : Type v := cocycle F G n
instance : AddCommGroup (Cocycle F G n) := by
dsimp only [Cocycle]
infer_instance
namespace Cocycle
variable {F G}
lemma mem_iff (hnm : n + 1 = m) (z : Cochain F G n) :
z ∈ cocycle F G n ↔ δ n m z = 0 := by subst hnm; rfl
variable {n}
instance : Coe (Cocycle F G n) (Cochain F G n) where
coe x := x.1
@[ext]
lemma ext (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) (h : (z₁ : Cochain F G n) = z₂) : z₁ = z₂ :=
Subtype.ext h
instance : SMul R (Cocycle F G n) where
smul r z := ⟨r • z.1, by
have hz := z.2
rw [mem_iff n (n + 1) rfl] at hz ⊢
simp only [δ_smul, hz, smul_zero]⟩
variable (F G n)
@[simp]
lemma coe_zero : (↑(0 : Cocycle F G n) : Cochain F G n) = 0 := by rfl
variable {F G n}
@[simp]
lemma coe_add (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(z₁ + z₂) : Cochain F G n) = (z₁ : Cochain F G n) + (z₂ : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_neg (z : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(-z) : Cochain F G n) = -(z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_smul (z : Cocycle F G n) (x : R) :
(↑(x • z) : Cochain F G n) = x • (z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_units_smul (z : Cocycle F G n) (x : Rˣ) :
(↑(x • z) : Cochain F G n) = x • (z : Cochain F G n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_sub (z₁ z₂ : Cocycle F G n) :
(↑(z₁ - z₂) : Cochain F G n) = (z₁ : Cochain F G n) - (z₂ : Cochain F G n) := rfl
instance : Module R (Cocycle F G n) where
one_smul _ := by aesop
mul_smul _ _ _ := by ext; dsimp; rw [smul_smul]
smul_zero _ := by aesop
smul_add _ _ _ := by aesop
add_smul _ _ _ := by ext; dsimp; rw [add_smul]
zero_smul := by aesop
/-- Constructor for `Cocycle F G n`, taking as inputs `z : Cochain F G n`, an integer
`m : ℤ` such that `n + 1 = m`, and the relation `δ n m z = 0`. -/
@[simps]
def mk (z : Cochain F G n) (m : ℤ) (hnm : n + 1 = m) (h : δ n m z = 0) : Cocycle F G n :=
⟨z, by simpa only [mem_iff n m hnm z] using h⟩
@[simp]
lemma δ_eq_zero {n : ℤ} (z : Cocycle F G n) (m : ℤ) : δ n m (z : Cochain F G n) = 0 := by
by_cases h : n + 1 = m
· rw [← mem_iff n m h]
exact z.2
· exact δ_shape n m h _
/-- The `0`-cocycle associated to a morphism in `CochainComplex C ℤ`. -/
@[simps!]
def ofHom (φ : F ⟶ G) : Cocycle F G 0 := mk (Cochain.ofHom φ) 1 (zero_add 1) (by simp)
/-- The morphism in `CochainComplex C ℤ` associated to a `0`-cocycle. -/
@[simps]
def homOf (z : Cocycle F G 0) : F ⟶ G where
f i := (z : Cochain _ _ _).v i i (add_zero i)
comm' := by
rintro i j rfl
rcases z with ⟨z, hz⟩
dsimp
rw [mem_iff 0 1 (zero_add 1)] at hz
simpa only [δ_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.zero_v, sub_eq_zero]
using Cochain.congr_v hz i (i + 1) rfl
@[simp]
lemma homOf_ofHom_eq_self (φ : F ⟶ G) : homOf (ofHom φ) = φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_homOf_eq_self (z : Cocycle F G 0) : ofHom (homOf z) = z := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma cochain_ofHom_homOf_eq_coe (z : Cocycle F G 0) :
Cochain.ofHom (homOf z) = (z : Cochain F G 0) := by
simpa only [Cocycle.ext_iff] using ofHom_homOf_eq_self z
variable (F G)
/-- The additive equivalence between morphisms in `CochainComplex C ℤ` and `0`-cocycles. -/
@[simps]
def equivHom : (F ⟶ G) ≃+ Cocycle F G 0 where
toFun := ofHom
invFun := homOf
left_inv := homOf_ofHom_eq_self
right_inv := ofHom_homOf_eq_self
map_add' := by aesop_cat
variable (K)
/-- The `1`-cocycle given by the differential on a cochain complex. -/
@[simps!]
def diff : Cocycle K K 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.diff K) 2 rfl (by
ext p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.zero_v, δ_v 1 2 rfl _ p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, Cochain.diff_v,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, smul_zero, add_zero])
end Cocycle
variable {F G}
@[simp]
lemma δ_comp_zero_cocycle {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (z₂ : Cocycle G K 0) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.comp z₂.1 (add_zero n)) =
(δ n m z₁).comp z₂.1 (add_zero m) := by
by_cases hnm : n + 1 = m
· simp [δ_comp_zero_cochain _ _ _ hnm]
· simp [δ_shape _ _ hnm]
@[simp]
lemma δ_comp_ofHom {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n) (f : G ⟶ K) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.comp (Cochain.ofHom f) (add_zero n)) =
(δ n m z₁).comp (Cochain.ofHom f) (add_zero m) := by
rw [← Cocycle.ofHom_coe, δ_comp_zero_cocycle]
@[simp]
lemma δ_zero_cocycle_comp {n : ℤ} (z₁ : Cocycle F G 0) (z₂ : Cochain G K n) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m (z₁.1.comp z₂ (zero_add n)) =
z₁.1.comp (δ n m z₂) (zero_add m) := by
by_cases hnm : n + 1 = m
· simp [δ_zero_cochain_comp _ _ _ hnm]
· simp [δ_shape _ _ hnm]
@[simp]
lemma δ_ofHom_comp {n : ℤ} (f : F ⟶ G) (z : Cochain G K n) (m : ℤ) :
δ n m ((Cochain.ofHom f).comp z (zero_add n)) =
(Cochain.ofHom f).comp (δ n m z) (zero_add m) := by
rw [← Cocycle.ofHom_coe, δ_zero_cocycle_comp]
namespace Cochain
/-- Given two morphisms of complexes `φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G`, the datum of an homotopy between `φ₁` and
`φ₂` is equivalent to the datum of a `1`-cochain `z` such that `δ (-1) 0 z` is the difference
of the zero cochains associated to `φ₂` and `φ₁`. -/
@[simps]
def equivHomotopy (φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G) :
Homotopy φ₁ φ₂ ≃
{ z : Cochain F G (-1) // Cochain.ofHom φ₁ = δ (-1) 0 z + Cochain.ofHom φ₂ } where
toFun ho := ⟨Cochain.ofHomotopy ho, by simp only [δ_ofHomotopy, sub_add_cancel]⟩
invFun z :=
{ hom := fun i j => if hij : i + (-1) = j then z.1.v i j hij else 0
zero := fun i j (hij : j + 1 ≠ i) => dif_neg (fun _ => hij (by omega))
comm := fun p => by
have eq := Cochain.congr_v z.2 p p (add_zero p)
have h₁ : (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel (p - 1) p := by simp
have h₂ : (ComplexShape.up ℤ).Rel p (p + 1) := by simp
simp only [δ_neg_one_cochain, Cochain.ofHom_v, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Cochain.add_v,
Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'_f h₁ h₂] at eq
rw [dNext_eq _ h₂, prevD_eq _ h₁, eq, dif_pos, dif_pos] }
left_inv := fun ho => by
ext i j
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· rw [ho.zero i j (fun h' => h (by dsimp at h'; omega))]
right_inv := fun z => by
ext p q hpq
dsimp [Cochain.ofHomotopy]
rw [dif_pos hpq]
@[simp]
lemma equivHomotopy_apply_of_eq {φ₁ φ₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) :
(equivHomotopy _ _ (Homotopy.ofEq h)).1 = 0 := rfl
lemma ofHom_injective {f₁ f₂ : F ⟶ G} (h : ofHom f₁ = ofHom f₂) : f₁ = f₂ :=
(Cocycle.equivHom F G).injective (by ext1; exact h)
end Cochain
section
variable {n} {D : Type*} [Category D] [Preadditive D] (z z' : Cochain K L n) (f : K ⟶ L)
(Φ : C ⥤ D) [Φ.Additive]
namespace Cochain
/-- If `Φ : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, a cochain `z : Cochain K L n` between
cochain complexes in `C` can be mapped to a cochain between the cochain complexes
in `D` obtained by applying the functor
`Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _ : CochainComplex C ℤ ⥤ CochainComplex D ℤ`. -/
def map : Cochain ((Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj K) ((Φ.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj L) n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => Φ.map (z.v p q hpq))
@[simp]
lemma map_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) : (z.map Φ).v p q hpq = Φ.map (z.v p q hpq) := rfl
@[simp]
protected lemma map_add : (z + z').map Φ = z.map Φ + z'.map Φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
protected lemma map_neg : (-z).map Φ = -z.map Φ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
protected lemma map_sub : (z - z').map Φ = z.map Φ - z'.map Φ := by aesop_cat
variable (K L n)
@[simp]
protected lemma map_zero : (0 : Cochain K L n).map Φ = 0 := by aesop_cat
| @[simp]
lemma map_comp {n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ} (z₁ : Cochain F G n₁) (z₂ : Cochain G K n₂) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplex.lean | 808 | 809 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
| h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 326 | 330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 347 | 349 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ` -/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit` -/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")]
alias nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse := nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
lemma inv_mulVec_eq_vec {A : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A]
{u v : n → α} (hM : u = A.mulVec v) : A⁻¹.mulVec u = v := by
rw [hM, Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible, Matrix.one_mulVec]
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse
[DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse
[DecidableEq m] [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable [DecidableEq m] {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.row ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← col_transpose, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.col ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← row_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit, isUnit_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.row :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.col :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ringInverse]
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹ ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_isUnit_det, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with ht | ht
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rcases (Fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc | hc
· rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc
haveI := hc
ext i
exact (IsEmpty.false i).elim
· have hn : Nonempty n := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ ?_
simp [hn]
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.one, Matrix.inv with inv_one := inv_eq_left_inv (by simp) }
theorem inv_smul (k : α) [Invertible k] (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟ k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_smul' (k : αˣ) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A := by
refine inv_eq_left_inv ?_
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, Units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.val_inv_mul, one_smul]
section Diagonal
/-- `diagonal v` is invertible if `v` is -/
def diagonalInvertible {α} [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] :
Invertible (diagonal v) :=
Invertible.map (diagonalRingHom n α) v
theorem invOf_diagonal_eq {α} [Semiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] [Invertible (diagonal v)] :
⅟ (diagonal v) = diagonal (⅟ v) := by
rw [@Invertible.congr _ _ _ _ _ (diagonalInvertible v) rfl]
rfl
/-- `v` is invertible if `diagonal v` is -/
def invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible (v : n → α) [Invertible (diagonal v)] : Invertible v where
invOf := diag (⅟ (diagonal v))
invOf_mul_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_assoc, prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
mul_invOf_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_prod_erase _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
/-- Together `Matrix.diagonalInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible (v : n → α) : Invertible (diagonal v) ≃ Invertible v where
toFun := @invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
invFun := @diagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_diagonal {v : n → α} : IsUnit (diagonal v) ↔ IsUnit v := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible v).nonempty_congr]
theorem inv_diagonal (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)⁻¹ = diagonal (Ring.inverse v) := by
rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse]
by_cases h : IsUnit v
· have := isUnit_diagonal.mpr h
cases this.nonempty_invertible
cases h.nonempty_invertible
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_diagonal_eq]
· have := isUnit_diagonal.not.mpr h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Pi.zero_def, diagonal_zero, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this]
end Diagonal
/-- The inverse of a 1×1 or 0×0 matrix is always diagonal.
While we could write this as `of fun _ _ => Ring.inverse (A default default)` on the RHS, this is
less useful because:
* It wouldn't work for 0×0 matrices.
* More things are true about diagonal matrices than constant matrices, and so more lemmas exist.
`Matrix.diagonal_unique` can be used to reach this form, while `Ring.inverse_eq_inv` can be used
to replace `Ring.inverse` with `⁻¹`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem inv_subsingleton [Subsingleton m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix m m α) :
A⁻¹ = diagonal fun i => Ring.inverse (A i i) := by
rw [inv_def, adjugate_subsingleton, smul_one_eq_diagonal]
congr! with i
exact det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
section Woodbury
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (U : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix m m α) (V : Matrix m n α)
/-- The **Woodbury Identity** (`⁻¹` version). -/
theorem add_mul_mul_inv_eq_sub (hA : IsUnit A) (hC : IsUnit C) (hAC : IsUnit (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)) :
(A + U * C * V)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ - A⁻¹ * U * (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)⁻¹ * V * A⁻¹ := by
| obtain ⟨_⟩ := hA.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hC.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨iAC⟩ := hAC.nonempty_invertible
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 596 | 598 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
| rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 272 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# Super-Polynomial Function Decay
This file defines a predicate `Asymptotics.SuperpolynomialDecay f` for a function satisfying
one of following equivalent definitions (The definition is in terms of the first condition):
* `x ^ n * f` tends to `𝓝 0` for all (or sufficiently large) naturals `n`
* `|x ^ n * f|` tends to `𝓝 0` for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero`)
* `|x ^ n * f|` is bounded for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_isBoundedUnder`)
* `f` is `o(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isLittleO`)
* `f` is `O(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isBigO`)
These conditions are all equivalent to conditions in terms of polynomials, replacing `x ^ c` with
`p(x)` or `p(x)⁻¹` as appropriate, since asymptotically `p(x)` behaves like `X ^ p.natDegree`.
These further equivalences are not proven in mathlib but would be good future projects.
The definition of superpolynomial decay for `f : α → β` is relative to a parameter `k : α → β`.
Super-polynomial decay then means `f x` decays faster than `(k x) ^ c` for all integers `c`.
Equivalently `f x` decays faster than `p.eval (k x)` for all polynomials `p : β[X]`.
The definition is also relative to a filter `l : Filter α` where the decay rate is compared.
When the map `k` is given by `n ↦ ↑n : ℕ → ℝ` this defines negligible functions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligible_function
When the map `k` is given by `(r₁,...,rₙ) ↦ r₁*...*rₙ : ℝⁿ → ℝ` this is equivalent
to the definition of rapidly decreasing functions given here:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rapidly+decreasing+function
# Main Theorems
* `SuperpolynomialDecay.polynomial_mul` says that if `f(x)` is negligible,
then so is `p(x) * f(x)` for any polynomial `p`.
* `superpolynomialDecay_iff_zpow_tendsto_zero` gives an equivalence between definitions in terms
of decaying faster than `k(x) ^ n` for all naturals `n` or `k(x) ^ c` for all integer `c`.
-/
namespace Asymptotics
open Topology Polynomial
open Filter
/-- `f` has superpolynomial decay in parameter `k` along filter `l` if
`k ^ n * f` tends to zero at `l` for all naturals `n` -/
def SuperpolynomialDecay {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β] (l : Filter α)
(k : α → β) (f : α → β) :=
∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => k a ^ n * f a) l (𝓝 0)
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α} {k : α → β} {f g g' : α → β}
section CommSemiring
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr' (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr' (EventuallyEq.mul (EventuallyEq.refl l _) hfg)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr fun x => (congr_arg fun a => k x ^ z * a) <| hfg x
@[simp]
theorem superpolynomialDecay_zero (l : Filter α) (k : α → β) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k 0 :=
fun z => by simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.add [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f + g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_add, add_zero, Pi.add_apply] using (hf z).add (hg z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_zero, pow_zero] using (hf z).mul (hg 0)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_const [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => f n * c := fun z => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, zero_mul] using Tendsto.mul_const c (hf z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.const_mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => c * f n :=
(hf.mul_const c).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_mul (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k * f) := fun z =>
tendsto_nhds.2 fun s hs hs0 =>
l.sets_of_superset ((tendsto_nhds.1 (hf <| z + 1)) s hs hs0) fun x hx => by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, Pi.mul_apply, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ] using hx
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_param (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k) :=
hf.param_mul.congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_pow_mul (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k ^ n * f) := by
induction n with
| zero => simpa only [one_mul, pow_zero] using hf
| succ n hn => simpa only [pow_succ', mul_assoc] using hn.param_mul
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_param_pow (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k ^ n) :=
(hf.param_pow_mul n).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.polynomial_mul [ContinuousAdd β] [ContinuousMul β]
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (p : β[X]) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun x => (p.eval <| k x) * f x :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simpa [add_mul] using hp.add hq) fun n c => by
simpa [mul_assoc] using (hf.param_pow_mul n).const_mul c
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_polynomial [ContinuousAdd β] [ContinuousMul β]
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (p : β[X]) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun x => f x * (p.eval <| k x) :=
(hf.polynomial_mul p).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
end CommSemiring
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_eventuallyLE (hk : 0 ≤ᶠ[l] k) (hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g)
(hg' : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g') (hfg : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) (hfg' : f ≤ᶠ[l] g') :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f := fun z =>
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' (hg z) (hg' z)
(hfg.mp (hk.mono fun _ hx hx' => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx' (pow_nonneg hx z)))
(hfg'.mp (hk.mono fun _ hx hx' => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx' (pow_nonneg hx z)))
end OrderedCommSemiring
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommRing β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
variable (l k f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => |k a ^ n * f a|) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h z => (tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero _).1 (h z), fun h z =>
(tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero _).2 (h z)⟩
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_superpolynomialDecay_abs :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l (fun a => |k a|) fun a => |f a| :=
(superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero l k f).trans
(by simp_rw [SuperpolynomialDecay, abs_mul, abs_pow])
variable {l k f}
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_eventually_abs_le (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hfg : abs ∘ g ≤ᶠ[l] abs ∘ f) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := by
rw [superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero] at hf ⊢
refine fun z =>
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds (hf z)
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => abs_nonneg _) (hfg.mono fun x hx => ?_)
calc
|k x ^ z * g x| = |k x ^ z| * |g x| := abs_mul (k x ^ z) (g x)
_ ≤ |k x ^ z| * |f x| := by gcongr _ * ?_; exact hx
_ = |k x ^ z * f x| := (abs_mul (k x ^ z) (f x)).symm
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.trans_abs_le (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hfg : ∀ x, |g x| ≤ |f x|) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g :=
hf.trans_eventually_abs_le (Eventually.of_forall hfg)
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section Field
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Field β] (l k f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_mul_const_iff [ContinuousMul β] {c : β} (hc0 : c ≠ 0) :
(SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => f n * c) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f :=
⟨fun h => (h.mul_const c⁻¹).congr fun x => by simp [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc0], fun h =>
h.mul_const c⟩
theorem superpolynomialDecay_const_mul_iff [ContinuousMul β] {c : β} (hc0 : c ≠ 0) :
(SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => c * f n) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f :=
⟨fun h => (h.const_mul c⁻¹).congr fun x => by simp [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hc0], fun h =>
h.const_mul c⟩
variable {l k f}
end Field
section LinearOrderedField
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Field β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] [OrderTopology β]
variable (f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_isBoundedUnder (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔
∀ z : ℕ, IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun a : α => |k a ^ z * f a| := by
refine
⟨fun h z => Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le (Tendsto.abs (h z)), fun h =>
(superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero l k f).2 fun z => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := h (z + 1)
have h1 : Tendsto (fun _ : α => (0 : β)) l (𝓝 0) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h2 : Tendsto (fun a : α => |(k a)⁻¹| * m) l (𝓝 0) :=
zero_mul m ▸
Tendsto.mul_const m ((tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero _).1 hk.inv_tendsto_atTop)
refine
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' h1 h2 (Eventually.of_forall fun x => abs_nonneg _)
((eventually_map.1 hm).mp ?_)
refine (hk.eventually_ne_atTop 0).mono fun x hk0 hx => ?_
refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx <| abs_nonneg (k x)⁻¹)
rw [← abs_mul, ← mul_assoc, pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hk0, one_mul]
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_zpow_tendsto_zero (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, Tendsto (fun a : α => k a ^ z * f a) l (𝓝 0) := by
refine ⟨fun h z => ?_, fun h n => by simpa only [zpow_natCast] using h (n : ℤ)⟩
by_cases hz : 0 ≤ z
· unfold Tendsto
lift z to ℕ using hz
simpa using h z
· have : Tendsto (fun a => k a ^ z) l (𝓝 0) :=
Tendsto.comp (tendsto_zpow_atTop_zero (not_le.1 hz)) hk
have h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 0) := by simpa using h 0
exact zero_mul (0 : β) ▸ this.mul h
variable {f}
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_zpow_mul (hk : Tendsto k l atTop)
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (z : ℤ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun a => k a ^ z * f a := by
rw [superpolynomialDecay_iff_zpow_tendsto_zero _ hk] at hf ⊢
refine fun z' => (hf <| z' + z).congr' ((hk.eventually_ne_atTop 0).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp [zpow_add₀ hx, mul_assoc, Pi.mul_apply]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_param_zpow (hk : Tendsto k l atTop)
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (z : ℤ) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun a => f a * k a ^ z :=
(hf.param_zpow_mul hk z).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.inv_param_mul (hk : Tendsto k l atTop)
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k⁻¹ * f) := by
simpa using hf.param_zpow_mul hk (-1)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.param_inv_mul (hk : Tendsto k l atTop)
(hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k⁻¹) :=
(hf.inv_param_mul hk).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
variable (f)
theorem superpolynomialDecay_param_mul_iff (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k * f) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f :=
⟨fun h =>
(h.inv_param_mul hk).congr'
((hk.eventually_ne_atTop 0).mono fun x hx => by simp [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx]),
fun h => h.param_mul⟩
theorem superpolynomialDecay_mul_param_iff (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f := by
simpa [mul_comm k] using superpolynomialDecay_param_mul_iff f hk
theorem superpolynomialDecay_param_pow_mul_iff (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (k ^ n * f) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
simpa [pow_succ, ← mul_comm k, mul_assoc,
superpolynomialDecay_param_mul_iff (k ^ n * f) hk] using hn
theorem superpolynomialDecay_mul_param_pow_iff (hk : Tendsto k l atTop) (n : ℕ) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * k ^ n) ↔ SuperpolynomialDecay l k f := by
simpa [mul_comm f] using superpolynomialDecay_param_pow_mul_iff f hk n
variable {f}
end LinearOrderedField
section NormedLinearOrderedField
variable [NormedField β]
variable (l k f)
|
theorem superpolynomialDecay_iff_norm_tendsto_zero :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => ‖k a ^ n * f a‖) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h z => tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (h z), fun h z =>
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 (h z)⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/SuperpolynomialDecay.lean | 279 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Colimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Instances
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.LocalPredicate
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `PrimeSpectrum R`.
We define the structure sheaf on `TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)`, for a commutative ring `R` and prove
basic properties about it. We define this as a subsheaf of the sheaf of dependent functions into the
localizations, cut out by the condition that the function must be locally equal to a ratio of
elements of `R`.
Because the condition "is equal to a fraction" passes to smaller open subsets,
the subset of functions satisfying this condition is automatically a subpresheaf.
Because the condition "is locally equal to a fraction" is local,
it is also a subsheaf.
(It may be helpful to refer back to `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafOfFunctions.lean`,
where we show that dependent functions into any type family form a sheaf,
and also `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/LocalPredicate.lean`, where we characterise the predicates
which pick out sub-presheaves and sub-sheaves of these sheaves.)
We also set up the ring structure, obtaining
`structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)`.
We then construct two basic isomorphisms, relating the structure sheaf to the underlying ring `R`.
First, `StructureSheaf.stalkIso` gives an isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf
at a point `p` and the localization of `R` at the prime ideal `p`. Second,
`StructureSheaf.basicOpenIso` gives an isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basicOpen f`
and the localization of `R` at the submonoid of powers of `f`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R]
open TopCat
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open Opposite
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The prime spectrum, just as a topological space.
-/
def PrimeSpectrum.Top : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
namespace StructureSheaf
/-- The type family over `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of the localization over each point.
-/
def Localizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Type u :=
Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance commRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance localRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : IsLocalRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsLocalRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Inhabited (Localizations R P) :=
⟨1⟩
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) : Algebra R (Localizations R x) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal)
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (Localizations R x) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal :=
Localization.isLocalization
variable {R}
/-- The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def IsFraction {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) : Prop :=
∃ r s : R, ∀ x : U, ¬s ∈ x.1.asIdeal ∧ f x * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r
theorem IsFraction.eq_mk' {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} {f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x}
(hf : IsFraction f) :
∃ r s : R,
∀ x : U,
∃ hs : s ∉ x.1.asIdeal,
f x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime _) r
(⟨s, hs⟩ : (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, s, h⟩
refine ⟨r, s, fun x => ⟨(h x).1, (IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr ?_).symm⟩⟩
exact (h x).2.symm
variable (R)
/-- The predicate `IsFraction` is "prelocal",
in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def isFractionPrelocal : PrelocalPredicate (Localizations R) where
pred {_} f := IsFraction f
res := by rintro V U i f ⟨r, s, w⟩; exact ⟨r, s, fun x => w (i x)⟩
/-- We will define the structure sheaf as
the subsheaf of all dependent functions in `Π x : U, Localizations R x`
consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed as a ratio of
(the images in the localization of) elements of `R`.
Quoting Hartshorne:
For an open set $U ⊆ Spec A$, we define $𝒪(U)$ to be the set of functions
$s : U → ⨆_{𝔭 ∈ U} A_𝔭$, such that $s(𝔭) ∈ A_𝔭$ for each $𝔭$,
and such that $s$ is locally a quotient of elements of $A$:
to be precise, we require that for each $𝔭 ∈ U$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $𝔭$,
contained in $U$, and elements $a, f ∈ A$, such that for each $𝔮 ∈ V, f ∉ 𝔮$,
and $s(𝔮) = a/f$ in $A_𝔮$.
Now Hartshorne had the disadvantage of not knowing about dependent functions,
so we replace his circumlocution about functions into a disjoint union with
`Π x : U, Localizations x`.
-/
def isLocallyFraction : LocalPredicate (Localizations R) :=
(isFractionPrelocal R).sheafify
@[simp]
theorem isLocallyFraction_pred {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) :
(isLocallyFraction R).pred f =
∀ x : U,
∃ (V : _) (_ : x.1 ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U),
∃ r s : R,
∀ y : V, ¬s ∈ y.1.asIdeal ∧ f (i y : U) * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r :=
rfl
/-- The functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction` form a subring.
-/
def sectionsSubring (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
Subring (∀ x : U.unop, Localizations R x) where
carrier := { f | (isLocallyFraction R).pred f }
zero_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 0, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
one_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 1, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.isPrime.1
· simp
add_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * sb + rb * sa, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.add_apply, RingHom.map_mul, add_mul, RingHom.map_add] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_assoc]
congr 2
rw [mul_comm]
neg_mem' := by
intro a ha x
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, r, s, w⟩
refine ⟨V, m, i, -r, s, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases w y with ⟨nm, w⟩
fconstructor
· exact nm
· simp only [RingHom.map_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
rw [← w]
simp only [neg_mul]
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * rb, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ ⟨y, hy⟩) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.isPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Opens.apply_mk, Pi.mul_apply, RingHom.map_mul] at wa wb ⊢
rw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
end StructureSheaf
open StructureSheaf
/-- The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRingCat`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction`.
-/
def structureSheafInType : Sheaf (Type u) (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
subsheafToTypes (isLocallyFraction R)
instance commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
CommRing ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U) :=
(sectionsSubring R U).toCommRing
open PrimeSpectrum
/-- The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRingCat`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf.
-/
@[simps obj_carrier]
def structurePresheafInCommRing : Presheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) where
obj U := CommRingCat.of ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U)
map {_ _} i := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun := (structureSheafInType R).1.map i
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- Some glue, verifying that the structure presheaf valued in `CommRingCat` agrees
with the `Type` valued structure presheaf.
-/
def structurePresheafCompForget :
structurePresheafInCommRing R ⋙ forget CommRingCat ≅ (structureSheafInType R).1 :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
open TopCat.Presheaf
/-- The structure sheaf on $Spec R$, valued in `CommRingCat`.
This is provided as a bundled `SheafedSpace` as `Spec.SheafedSpace R` later.
-/
def Spec.structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
⟨structurePresheafInCommRing R,
(-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRingCat`.
isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
_ _).mpr
(isSheaf_of_iso (structurePresheafCompForget R).symm (structureSheafInType R).cond)⟩
open Spec (structureSheaf)
namespace StructureSheaf
@[simp]
theorem res_apply (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U)
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : V) :
((structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s).1 x = (s.1 (i x) :) :=
rfl
/-
Notation in this comment
X = Spec R
OX = structure sheaf
In the following we construct an isomorphism between OX_p and R_p given any point p corresponding
to a prime ideal in R.
We do this via 8 steps:
1. def const (f g : R) (V) (hv : V ≤ D_g) : OX(V) [for api]
2. def toOpen (U) : R ⟶ OX(U)
3. [2] def toStalk (p : Spec R) : R ⟶ OX_p
4. [2] def toBasicOpen (f : R) : R_f ⟶ OX(D_f)
5. [3] def localizationToStalk (p : Spec R) : R_p ⟶ OX_p
6. def openToLocalization (U) (p) (hp : p ∈ U) : OX(U) ⟶ R_p
7. [6] def stalkToFiberRingHom (p : Spec R) : OX_p ⟶ R_p
8. [5,7] def stalkIso (p : Spec R) : OX_p ≅ R_p
In the square brackets we list the dependencies of a construction on the previous steps.
-/
/-- The section of `structureSheaf R` on an open `U` sending each `x ∈ U` to the element
`f/g` in the localization of `R` at `x`. -/
def const (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
⟨fun x => IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, g, fun y => ⟨hu y y.2, IsLocalization.mk'_spec _ _ _⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal) f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem const_apply' (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U)
(hx : g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hx⟩ :=
rfl
theorem exists_const (U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
∃ (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (_ : x ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U) (f g : R) (hg : _),
const R f g V hg = (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
let ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hfg⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hx⟩
⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, fun y hyV => (hfg ⟨y, hyV⟩).1,
Subtype.eq <| funext fun y => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| Eq.symm <| (hfg y).2⟩
@[simp]
theorem res_const (f g : R) (U hu V hv i) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map i (const R f g U hu) = const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem res_const' (f g : R) (V hv) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map (homOfLE hv).op (const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ => id) =
const R f g V hv :=
rfl
theorem const_zero (f : R) (U hu) : const R 0 f U hu = 0 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| by
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
exact (mul_eq_zero_of_left rfl ((algebraMap R (Localizations R x)) _)).symm
theorem const_self (f : R) (U hu) : const R f f U hu = 1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => IsLocalization.mk'_self _ _
theorem const_one (U) : (const R 1 1 U fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _) = 1 :=
const_self R 1 U _
theorem const_add (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ + const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * g₂ + f₂ * g₁) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx =>
Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_add _ _
⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_mul (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ * const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx => Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_mul _ f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
theorem const_ext {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu₁ hu₂} (h : f₁ * g₂ = f₂ * g₁) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ = const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_of_eq (by rw [mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk, ← h, mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk])
theorem const_congr {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu} (hf : f₁ = f₂) (hg : g₁ = g₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu = const R f₂ g₂ U (hg ▸ hu) := by substs hf hg; rfl
theorem const_mul_rev (f g : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) : const R f g U hu₁ * const R g f U hu₂ = 1 := by
rw [const_mul, const_congr R rfl (mul_comm g f), const_self]
theorem const_mul_cancel (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g₁ U hu₁ * const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [const_mul, const_ext]; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem const_mul_cancel' (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ * const R f g₁ U hu₁ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [mul_comm, const_mul_cancel]
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as
a section of the structure sheaf. -/
def toOpen (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) :
CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun f :=
⟨fun _ => algebraMap R _ f, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, 1, fun y =>
⟨(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 y.1.2.1, by simp [RingHom.map_one, mul_one]⟩⟩⟩
map_one' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_one _
map_mul' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_mul _ _ _
map_zero' := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_zero _
map_add' _ _ := Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => RingHom.map_add _ _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_res (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op = toOpen R V :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_apply (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) (x : U) :
(toOpen R U f).1 x = algebraMap _ _ f :=
rfl
theorem toOpen_eq_const (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (f : R) :
toOpen R U f = const R f 1 U fun x _ => (Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).1 x.2.1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_one _ f
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting an element of `R` as an element of
the stalk of `structureSheaf R` at `x`. -/
def toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRingCat.of R ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
(toOpen R ⊤ ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ _ x (by trivial))
@[simp]
theorem toOpen_germ (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
toOpen R U ≫ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx = toStalk R x := by
rw [← toOpen_res R ⊤ U (homOfLE le_top : U ⟶ ⊤), Category.assoc, Presheaf.germ_res]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem germ_toOpen
(U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx (toOpen R U f) = toStalk R x f := by
rw [← toOpen_germ]; rfl
theorem toOpen_Γgerm_apply (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.Γgerm x (toOpen R ⊤ f) = toStalk R x f :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_to_basicOpen_self (f : R) : IsUnit (toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) f) :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (const R 1 f (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) fun _ => id) <| by
rw [toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_rev]
theorem isUnit_toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
IsUnit (toStalk R x (f : R)) := by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (f : R)) x f.2 (f : R)]
exact RingHom.isUnit_map _ (isUnit_to_basicOpen_self R f)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from the localization of `R` at `p` to the stalk
of the structure sheaf at the point `p`. -/
def localizationToStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) ⟶ (structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x :=
CommRingCat.ofHom <|
show Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal →+* _ from IsLocalization.lift (isUnit_toStalk R x)
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_of (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
localizationToStalk R x (algebraMap _ (Localization _) f) = toStalk R x f :=
IsLocalization.lift_eq (S := Localization x.asIdeal.primeCompl) _ f
@[simp]
theorem localizationToStalk_mk' (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) (s : x.asIdeal.primeCompl) :
localizationToStalk R x (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) f s) =
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (s : R)) x s.2
(const R f s (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ => id) :=
(IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec (S := Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2,
← germ_toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) x s.2, ← RingHom.map_mul, toOpen_eq_const,
toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
/-- The ring homomorphism that takes a section of the structure sheaf of `R` on the open set `U`,
implemented as a subtype of dependent functions to localizations at prime ideals, and evaluates
the section on the point corresponding to a given prime ideal. -/
def openToLocalization (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) ⟶ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) :=
CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun s := (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_openToLocalization (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
(openToLocalization R U x hx :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) → Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) =
fun s => s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
theorem openToLocalization_apply (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
openToLocalization R U x hx s = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The ring homomorphism from the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point corresponding to
a prime ideal `p` to the localization of `R` at `p`,
formed by gluing the `openToLocalization` maps. -/
def stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ⟶ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) :=
Limits.colimit.desc ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ (structureSheaf R).1)
{ pt := _
ι := { app := fun U =>
openToLocalization R ((OpenNhds.inclusion _).obj (unop U)) x (unop U).2 } }
@[simp]
theorem germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom
(U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x =
openToLocalization R U x hx :=
Limits.colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[simp]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_germ (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (hx : x ∈ U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x ((structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ U x hx s) = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
RingHom.ext_iff.mp (CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom R U x hx)) s
@[simp]
theorem toStalk_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
toStalk R x ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x = CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap _ _) := by
rw [toStalk, Category.assoc, germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_toStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) (f : R) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x (toStalk R x f) = algebraMap _ _ f :=
RingHom.ext_iff.1 (CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (toStalk_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom R x)) _
/-- The ring isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf of `R` at a point `p`
corresponding to a prime ideal in `R` and the localization of `R` at `p`. -/
@[simps]
def stalkIso (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
(structureSheaf R).presheaf.stalk x ≅ CommRingCat.of (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) where
hom := stalkToFiberRingHom R x
inv := localizationToStalk R x
hom_inv_id := by
apply stalk_hom_ext
intro U hxU
ext s
dsimp only [CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, CommRingCat.hom_id,
RingHom.coe_id, id_eq]
rw [stalkToFiberRingHom_germ]
obtain ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, (hg : V ≤ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen _), hs⟩ :=
exists_const _ _ s x hxU
have := res_apply R U V iVU s ⟨x, hxV⟩
dsimp only [isLocallyFraction_pred, Opens.apply_mk] at this
rw [← this, ← hs, const_apply, localizationToStalk_mk']
refine (structureSheaf R).presheaf.germ_ext V hxV (homOfLE hg) iVU ?_
rw [← hs, res_const']
inv_hom_id := CommRingCat.hom_ext <|
@IsLocalization.ringHom_ext R _ x.asIdeal.primeCompl (Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _
(Localization.AtPrime x.asIdeal) _ _
(RingHom.comp (stalkToFiberRingHom R x).hom (localizationToStalk R x).hom)
(RingHom.id (Localization.AtPrime _)) <| by
ext f
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, localizationToStalk_of,
stalkToFiberRingHom_toStalk, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsIso (stalkToFiberRingHom R x) :=
(stalkIso R x).isIso_hom
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsLocalHom (stalkToFiberRingHom R x).hom :=
isLocalHom_of_isIso _
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsIso (localizationToStalk R x) :=
(stalkIso R x).isIso_inv
instance (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : IsLocalHom (localizationToStalk R x).hom :=
isLocalHom_of_isIso _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_localizationToStalk (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
stalkToFiberRingHom R x ≫ localizationToStalk R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalkIso R x).hom_inv_id
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem localizationToStalk_stalkToFiberRingHom (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :
localizationToStalk R x ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom R x = 𝟙 _ :=
(stalkIso R x).inv_hom_id
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism interpreting `s ∈ R_f` as a section of the structure sheaf
on the basic open defined by `f ∈ R`. -/
def toBasicOpen (f : R) :
Localization.Away f →+* (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op <| PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) :=
IsLocalization.Away.lift f (isUnit_to_basicOpen_self R f)
@[simp]
theorem toBasicOpen_mk' (s f : R) (g : Submonoid.powers s) :
toBasicOpen R s (IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.Away s) f g) =
const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ hx => Submonoid.powers_le.2 hx g.2 :=
(IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _).2 <| by
rw [toOpen_eq_const, toOpen_eq_const, const_mul_cancel']
@[simp]
theorem localization_toBasicOpen (f : R) :
RingHom.comp (toBasicOpen R f) (algebraMap R (Localization.Away f)) =
(toOpen R (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)).hom :=
RingHom.ext fun g => by
rw [toBasicOpen, IsLocalization.Away.lift, RingHom.comp_apply, IsLocalization.lift_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toBasicOpen_to_map (s f : R) :
toBasicOpen R s (algebraMap R (Localization.Away s) f) =
const R f 1 (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen s) fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _ :=
(IsLocalization.lift_eq _ _).trans <| toOpen_eq_const _ _ _
-- The proof here follows the argument in Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry, Proposition II.2.2.
theorem toBasicOpen_injective (f : R) : Function.Injective (toBasicOpen R f) := by
intro s t h_eq
obtain ⟨a, ⟨b, hb⟩, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective (Submonoid.powers f) s
obtain ⟨c, ⟨d, hd⟩, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective (Submonoid.powers f) t
simp only [toBasicOpen_mk'] at h_eq
rw [IsLocalization.eq]
-- We know that the fractions `a/b` and `c/d` are equal as sections of the structure sheaf on
-- `basicOpen f`. We need to show that they agree as elements in the localization of `R` at `f`.
-- This amounts showing that `r * (d * a) = r * (b * c)`, for some power `r = f ^ n` of `f`.
-- We define `I` as the ideal of *all* elements `r` satisfying the above equation.
let I : Ideal R :=
{ carrier := { r : R | r * (d * a) = r * (b * c) }
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, zero_mul]
add_mem' := fun {r₁ r₂} hr₁ hr₂ => by dsimp at hr₁ hr₂ ⊢; simp only [add_mul, hr₁, hr₂]
smul_mem' := fun {r₁ r₂} hr₂ => by dsimp at hr₂ ⊢; simp only [mul_assoc, hr₂] }
-- Our claim now reduces to showing that `f` is contained in the radical of `I`
suffices f ∈ I.radical by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := this
exact ⟨⟨f ^ n, n, rfl⟩, hn⟩
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical, PrimeSpectrum.mem_vanishingIdeal]
intro p hfp
contrapose hfp
rw [PrimeSpectrum.mem_zeroLocus, Set.not_subset]
have := congr_fun (congr_arg Subtype.val h_eq) ⟨p, hfp⟩
dsimp at this
rw [IsLocalization.eq (S := Localization.AtPrime p.asIdeal)] at this
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := this
exact ⟨r.1, hr, r.2⟩
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `toBasicOpen`.
Every section can locally be represented on basic opens `basicOpen g` as a fraction `f/g`
-/
theorem locally_const_basicOpen (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : U) :
∃ (f g : R) (i : PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g ⟶ U), x.1 ∈ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g ∧
(const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ hy => hy) =
(structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s := by
-- First, any section `s` can be represented as a fraction `f/g` on some open neighborhood of `x`
-- and we may pass to a `basicOpen h`, since these form a basis
obtain ⟨V, hxV : x.1 ∈ V.1, iVU, f, g, hVDg : V ≤ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g, s_eq⟩ :=
exists_const R U s x.1 x.2
obtain ⟨_, ⟨h, rfl⟩, hxDh, hDhV : PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen h ≤ V⟩ :=
PrimeSpectrum.isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens.exists_subset_of_mem_open hxV V.2
-- The problem is of course, that `g` and `h` don't need to coincide.
-- But, since `basicOpen h ≤ basicOpen g`, some power of `h` must be a multiple of `g`
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_le_basicOpen_iff h g).mp (Set.Subset.trans hDhV hVDg)
-- Actually, we will need a *nonzero* power of `h`.
-- This is because we will need the equality `basicOpen (h ^ n) = basicOpen h`, which only
-- holds for a nonzero power `n`. We therefore artificially increase `n` by one.
replace hn := Ideal.mul_mem_right h (Ideal.span {g}) hn
rw [← pow_succ, Ideal.mem_span_singleton'] at hn
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hn
have basic_opens_eq := PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_pow h (n + 1) (by omega)
have i_basic_open := eqToHom basic_opens_eq ≫ homOfLE hDhV
-- We claim that `(f * c) / h ^ (n+1)` is our desired representation
use f * c, h ^ (n + 1), i_basic_open ≫ iVU, (basic_opens_eq.symm.le :) hxDh
rw [op_comp, Functor.map_comp, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← s_eq, res_const]
-- Note that the last rewrite here generated an additional goal, which was a parameter
-- of `res_const`. We prove this goal first
swap
· intro y hy
rw [basic_opens_eq] at hy
exact (Set.Subset.trans hDhV hVDg :) hy
-- All that is left is a simple calculation
| apply const_ext
rw [mul_assoc f c g, hc]
/-
Auxiliary lemma for surjectivity of `toBasicOpen`.
A local representation of a section `s` as fractions `a i / h i` on finitely many basic opens
`basicOpen (h i)` can be "normalized" in such a way that `a i * h j = h i * a j` for all `i, j`
-/
theorem normalize_finite_fraction_representation (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) {ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) (a h : ι → R)
(iDh : ∀ i : ι, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i) ⟶ U)
(h_cover : U ≤ ⨆ i ∈ t, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i))
(hs :
∀ i : ι,
(const R (a i) (h i) (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h i)) fun _ hy => hy) =
(structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh i).op s) :
∃ (a' h' : ι → R) (iDh' : ∀ i : ι, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i) ⟶ U),
(U ≤ ⨆ i ∈ t, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i)) ∧
(∀ (i) (_ : i ∈ t) (j) (_ : j ∈ t), a' i * h' j = h' i * a' j) ∧
∀ i ∈ t,
(structureSheaf R).1.map (iDh' i).op s =
const R (a' i) (h' i) (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen (h' i)) fun _ hy => hy := by
-- First we show that the fractions `(a i * h j) / (h i * h j)` and `(h i * a j) / (h i * h j)`
-- coincide in the localization of `R` at `h i * h j`
have fractions_eq :
∀ i j : ι,
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.Away (h i * h j))
(a i * h j) ⟨h i * h j, Submonoid.mem_powers _⟩ =
IsLocalization.mk' _ (h i * a j) ⟨h i * h j, Submonoid.mem_powers _⟩ := by
intro i j
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/StructureSheaf.lean | 652 | 681 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
div_lt_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
div_le_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
div_le_div₀ hc hac hd hbd
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀ hac hbd c0 d0
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀' (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀' hac hbd c0 d0
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
@[bound]
theorem div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_pos_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha hb₀ hb₁
theorem one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [le_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [div_le_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_comm₀ ha hb
theorem one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_comm₀ ha hb
theorem le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_comm₀ ha hb
theorem lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_comm₀ ha hb
@[bound] lemma Bound.one_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : b < a → 1 < a / b := (one_lt_div b0).mpr
@[bound] lemma Bound.div_lt_one_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : a < b → a / b < 1 := (div_lt_one b0).mpr
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using inv_anti₀ ha h
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
theorem le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
theorem lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
theorem one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
theorem one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [le_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
theorem half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
div_pos h zero_lt_two
theorem one_half_pos : (0 : α) < 1 / 2 :=
half_pos zero_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem half_le_self_iff : a / 2 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rw [div_le_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
@[simp]
theorem half_lt_self_iff : a / 2 < a ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
alias ⟨_, half_le_self⟩ := half_le_self_iff
alias ⟨_, half_lt_self⟩ := half_lt_self_iff
alias div_two_lt_of_pos := half_lt_self
theorem one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 :=
half_lt_self zero_lt_one
theorem two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 :=
(one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
theorem left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_thirds (a : α) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_add_div_same, div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, ← add_one_mul 2 a, two_add_one_eq_three,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ a three_ne_zero]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left ha, inv_pos]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_right (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right (inv_pos.2 hb)]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff₀ hc]
theorem div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
theorem exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a := by
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1 := div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inr zero_lt_one))
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, ?_⟩
rw [← lt_div_iff₀ this, div_div_cancel₀ h.ne']
exact lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| lt_add_one _)
theorem exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b;
⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff₀ hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone_div_right_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hbc ha
lemma strictMono_div_right_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : StrictMono (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_lt_div_of_pos_right hbc ha
theorem Monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 ≤ c) : Monotone fun x => f x / c := (monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).comp hf
theorem StrictMono.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : StrictMono f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 < c) : StrictMono fun x => f x / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedSemiField.toDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered α where
dense a₁ a₂ h :=
⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc
a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 := (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
_ < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_left h _) zero_lt_two
,
calc
(a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_right h _) zero_lt_two
_ = a₂ := add_self_div_two a₂
⟩
theorem min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_min.symm
theorem max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_max.symm
theorem one_div_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => 1 / x) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ x1 _ y1 xy => (one_div_lt_one_div (Set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (Set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
theorem one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_lt_one_div ?_ ?_).2 (pow_lt_pow_right₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
theorem one_div_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
theorem inv_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ hy xy =>
(inv_lt_inv₀ hy hx).2 xy
theorem inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
theorem inv_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_le_mul₀ {α : Type*}
[Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a ≤ b * ε := by
refine ⟨fun h _ hε ↦ h.trans <| le_mul_of_one_le_right hb hε.le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl|hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp_rw [zero_mul] at h
exact h 2 one_lt_two
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun x hbx => ?_
convert h (x / b) ((one_lt_div hb).mpr hbx)
rw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hb.ne']
/-! ### Results about `IsGLB` -/
theorem IsGLB.mul_left {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => a * b) '' s) (a * b) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· exact (OrderIso.mulLeft₀ _ ha).isGLB_image'.2 hs
· simp_rw [zero_mul]
rw [hs.nonempty.image_const]
exact isGLB_singleton
theorem IsGLB.mul_right {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => b * a) '' s) (b * a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg -/
theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
simp only [division_def, mul_pos_iff, inv_pos, inv_lt_zero]
theorem div_neg_iff : a / b < 0 ↔ 0 < a ∧ b < 0 ∨ a < 0 ∧ 0 < b := by
simp [division_def, mul_neg_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ b ≤ 0 := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonneg_iff]
theorem div_nonpos_iff : a / b ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ b ≤ 0 ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ b := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonpos_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
div_nonneg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_pos_of_neg_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a / b :=
div_pos_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
| theorem div_neg_of_pos_of_neg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 <| Or.inl ⟨ha, hb⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 327 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Praneeth Kolichala. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Praneeth Kolichala
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BinaryRec
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
/-!
# Additional properties of binary recursion on `Nat`
This file documents additional properties of binary recursion,
which allows us to more easily work with operations which do depend
on the number of leading zeros in the binary representation of `n`.
For example, we can more easily work with `Nat.bits` and `Nat.size`.
See also: `Nat.bitwise`, `Nat.pow` (for various lemmas about `size` and `shiftLeft`/`shiftRight`),
and `Nat.digits`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
-- Once we're in the `Nat` namespace, `xor` will inconveniently resolve to `Nat.xor`.
/-- `bxor` denotes the `xor` function i.e. the exclusive-or function on type `Bool`. -/
local notation "bxor" => xor
namespace Nat
universe u
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- `boddDiv2 n` returns a 2-tuple of type `(Bool, Nat)` where the `Bool` value indicates whether
`n` is odd or not and the `Nat` value returns `⌊n/2⌋` -/
def boddDiv2 : ℕ → Bool × ℕ
| 0 => (false, 0)
| succ n =>
match boddDiv2 n with
| (false, m) => (true, m)
| (true, m) => (false, succ m)
/-- `div2 n = ⌊n/2⌋` the greatest integer smaller than `n/2` -/
def div2 (n : ℕ) : ℕ := (boddDiv2 n).2
/-- `bodd n` returns `true` if `n` is odd -/
def bodd (n : ℕ) : Bool := (boddDiv2 n).1
@[simp] lemma bodd_zero : bodd 0 = false := rfl
@[simp] lemma bodd_one : bodd 1 = true := rfl
lemma bodd_two : bodd 2 = false := rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_succ (n : ℕ) : bodd (succ n) = not (bodd n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2]
let ⟨b,m⟩ := boddDiv2 n
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
lemma bodd_add (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m + n) = bxor (bodd m) (bodd n) := by
induction n
case zero => simp
case succ n ih => simp [← Nat.add_assoc, Bool.xor_not, ih]
@[simp]
lemma bodd_mul (m n : ℕ) : bodd (m * n) = (bodd m && bodd n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [mul_succ, bodd_add, IH, bodd_succ]
cases bodd m <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma mod_two_of_bodd (n : ℕ) : n % 2 = (bodd n).toNat := by
have := congr_arg bodd (mod_add_div n 2)
simp? [not] at this says
simp only [bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, not, bodd_zero, Bool.false_and, Bool.bne_false]
at this
have _ : ∀ b, and false b = false := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
have _ : ∀ b, bxor b false = b := by
intro b
cases b <;> rfl
rw [← this]
rcases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h | h <;> rw [h] <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_zero : div2 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma div2_one : div2 1 = 0 := rfl
lemma div2_two : div2 2 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma div2_succ (n : ℕ) : div2 (n + 1) = cond (bodd n) (succ (div2 n)) (div2 n) := by
simp only [bodd, boddDiv2, div2]
rcases boddDiv2 n with ⟨_|_, _⟩ <;> simp
attribute [local simp] Nat.add_comm Nat.add_assoc Nat.add_left_comm Nat.mul_comm Nat.mul_assoc
lemma bodd_add_div2 : ∀ n, (bodd n).toNat + 2 * div2 n = n
| 0 => rfl
| succ n => by
simp only [bodd_succ, Bool.cond_not, div2_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (congr_arg succ (bodd_add_div2 n))
cases bodd n
· simp
· simp; omega
lemma div2_val (n) : div2 n = n / 2 := by
refine Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by decide)
(Nat.add_left_cancel (Eq.trans ?_ (Nat.mod_add_div n 2).symm))
rw [mod_two_of_bodd, bodd_add_div2]
lemma bit_decomp (n : Nat) : bit (bodd n) (div2 n) = n :=
(bit_val _ _).trans <| (Nat.add_comm _ _).trans <| bodd_add_div2 _
lemma bit_zero : bit false 0 = 0 :=
rfl
/-- `shiftLeft' b m n` performs a left shift of `m` `n` times
and adds the bit `b` as the least significant bit each time.
Returns the corresponding natural number -/
def shiftLeft' (b : Bool) (m : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => m
| n + 1 => bit b (shiftLeft' b m n)
@[simp]
lemma shiftLeft'_false : ∀ n, shiftLeft' false m n = m <<< n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
have : 2 * (m * 2^n) = 2^(n+1)*m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_assoc, ← Nat.pow_succ]; simp
simp [shiftLeft_eq, shiftLeft', bit_val, shiftLeft'_false, this]
/-- Lean takes the unprimed name for `Nat.shiftLeft_eq m n : m <<< n = m * 2 ^ n`. -/
@[simp] lemma shiftLeft_eq' (m n : Nat) : shiftLeft m n = m <<< n := rfl
@[simp] lemma shiftRight_eq (m n : Nat) : shiftRight m n = m >>> n := rfl
lemma binaryRec_decreasing (h : n ≠ 0) : div2 n < n := by
rw [div2_val]
apply (div_lt_iff_lt_mul <| succ_pos 1).2
have := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ_self 1)
(lt_of_le_of_ne n.zero_le h.symm)
rwa [Nat.mul_one] at this
/-- `size n` : Returns the size of a natural number in
bits i.e. the length of its binary representation -/
def size : ℕ → ℕ :=
binaryRec 0 fun _ _ => succ
/-- `bits n` returns a list of Bools which correspond to the binary representation of n, where
the head of the list represents the least significant bit -/
def bits : ℕ → List Bool :=
binaryRec [] fun b _ IH => b :: IH
/-- `ldiff a b` performs bitwise set difference. For each corresponding
pair of bits taken as booleans, say `aᵢ` and `bᵢ`, it applies the
boolean operation `aᵢ ∧ ¬bᵢ` to obtain the `iᵗʰ` bit of the result. -/
def ldiff : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ :=
bitwise fun a b => a && not b
/-! bitwise ops -/
lemma bodd_bit (b n) : bodd (bit b n) = b := by
rw [bit_val]
simp only [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.add_comm, bodd_add, bodd_mul, bodd_succ, bodd_zero, Bool.not_false,
Bool.not_true, Bool.and_false, Bool.xor_false]
cases b <;> cases bodd n <;> rfl
lemma div2_bit (b n) : div2 (bit b n) = n := by
rw [bit_val, div2_val, Nat.add_comm, add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt, Nat.zero_add]
<;> cases b
<;> decide
lemma shiftLeft'_add (b m n) : ∀ k, shiftLeft' b m (n + k) = shiftLeft' b (shiftLeft' b m n) k
| | 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => congr_arg (bit b) (shiftLeft'_add b m n k)
lemma shiftLeft'_sub (b m) : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → shiftLeft' b m (n - k) = (shiftLeft' b m n) >>> k
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, k + 1, h => by
rw [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, shiftLeft', Nat.add_comm, shiftRight_add]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Bits.lean | 179 | 185 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise
/-!
# Submonoid of inverses
Given a submonoid `N` of a monoid `M`, we define the submonoid `N.leftInv` as the submonoid of
left inverses of `N`. When `M` is commutative, we may define `fromCommLeftInv : N.leftInv →* N`
since the inverses are unique. When `N ≤ IsUnit.Submonoid M`, this is precisely
the pointwise inverse of `N`, and we may define `leftInvEquiv : S.leftInv ≃* S`.
For the pointwise inverse of submonoids of groups, please refer to the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Pointwise`.
`N.leftInv` is distinct from `N.units`, which is the subgroup of `Mˣ` containing all units that are
in `N`. See the implementation notes of `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Units` for more details on
related constructions.
## TODO
Define the submonoid of right inverses and two-sided inverses.
See the comments of https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10679 for a possible implementation.
-/
variable {M : Type*}
namespace Submonoid
@[to_additive]
noncomputable instance [Monoid M] : Group (IsUnit.submonoid M) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (IsUnit.submonoid M)) with
inv := fun x ↦ ⟨x.prop.unit⁻¹.val, x.prop.unit⁻¹.isUnit⟩
inv_mul_cancel := fun x ↦
Subtype.ext ((Units.val_mul x.prop.unit⁻¹ _).trans x.prop.unit.inv_val) }
@[to_additive]
noncomputable instance [CommMonoid M] : CommGroup (IsUnit.submonoid M) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Group (IsUnit.submonoid M)) with
mul_comm := fun a b ↦ by convert mul_comm a b }
@[to_additive]
theorem IsUnit.Submonoid.coe_inv [Monoid M] (x : IsUnit.submonoid M) :
↑x⁻¹ = (↑x.prop.unit⁻¹ : M) :=
rfl
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] (S : Submonoid M)
/-- `S.leftInv` is the submonoid containing all the left inverses of `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"`S.leftNeg` is the additive submonoid containing all the left additive inverses of `S`."]
def leftInv : Submonoid M where
carrier := { x : M | ∃ y : S, x * y = 1 }
one_mem' := ⟨1, mul_one 1⟩
mul_mem' := fun {a} _b ⟨a', ha⟩ ⟨b', hb⟩ ↦
⟨b' * a', by simp only [coe_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc a, hb, mul_one, ha]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInv_leftInv_le : S.leftInv.leftInv ≤ S := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, z, h₁⟩, h₂ : x * y = 1⟩
convert z.prop
rw [← mul_one x, ← h₁, ← mul_assoc, h₂, one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem unit_mem_leftInv (x : Mˣ) (hx : (x : M) ∈ S) : ((x⁻¹ :) : M) ∈ S.leftInv :=
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, x.inv_val⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInv_leftInv_eq (hS : S ≤ IsUnit.submonoid M) : S.leftInv.leftInv = S := by
refine le_antisymm S.leftInv_leftInv_le ?_
intro x hx
have : x = ((hS hx).unit⁻¹⁻¹ : Mˣ) := by
rw [inv_inv (hS hx).unit]
rfl
rw [this]
exact S.leftInv.unit_mem_leftInv _ (S.unit_mem_leftInv _ hx)
/-- The function from `S.leftInv` to `S` sending an element to its right inverse in `S`.
This is a `MonoidHom` when `M` is commutative. -/
@[to_additive
"The function from `S.leftAdd` to `S` sending an element to its right additive
inverse in `S`. This is an `AddMonoidHom` when `M` is commutative."]
noncomputable def fromLeftInv : S.leftInv → S := fun x ↦ x.prop.choose
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_fromLeftInv (x : S.leftInv) : (x : M) * S.fromLeftInv x = 1 :=
x.prop.choose_spec
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fromLeftInv_one : S.fromLeftInv 1 = 1 :=
(one_mul _).symm.trans (Subtype.eq <| S.mul_fromLeftInv 1)
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] (S : Submonoid M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fromLeftInv_mul (x : S.leftInv) : (S.fromLeftInv x : M) * x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_fromLeftInv]
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInv_le_isUnit : S.leftInv ≤ IsUnit.submonoid M := fun x ⟨y, hx⟩ ↦
⟨⟨x, y, hx, mul_comm x y ▸ hx⟩, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem fromLeftInv_eq_iff (a : S.leftInv) (b : M) :
(S.fromLeftInv a : M) = b ↔ (a : M) * b = 1 := by
rw [← IsUnit.mul_right_inj (leftInv_le_isUnit _ a.prop), S.mul_fromLeftInv, eq_comm]
/-- The `MonoidHom` from `S.leftInv` to `S` sending an element to its right inverse in `S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The `AddMonoidHom` from `S.leftNeg` to `S` sending an element to its
right additive inverse in `S`."]
noncomputable def fromCommLeftInv : S.leftInv →* S where
toFun := S.fromLeftInv
map_one' := S.fromLeftInv_one
map_mul' x y :=
Subtype.ext <| by
rw [fromLeftInv_eq_iff, mul_comm x, Submonoid.coe_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, mul_assoc, ←
mul_assoc (x : M), mul_fromLeftInv, one_mul, mul_fromLeftInv]
variable (hS : S ≤ IsUnit.submonoid M)
/-- The submonoid of pointwise inverse of `S` is `MulEquiv` to `S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps apply) "The additive submonoid of pointwise additive inverse of `S` is
`AddEquiv` to `S`."]
noncomputable def leftInvEquiv : S.leftInv ≃* S :=
{ S.fromCommLeftInv with
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨↑(hS x.2).unit⁻¹, x, by simp⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext
simp [← Units.mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
ext
simp [fromLeftInv_eq_iff] }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fromLeftInv_leftInvEquiv_symm (x : S) : S.fromLeftInv ((S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x) = x :=
(S.leftInvEquiv hS).right_inv x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem leftInvEquiv_symm_fromLeftInv (x : S.leftInv) :
(S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm (S.fromLeftInv x) = x :=
(S.leftInvEquiv hS).left_inv x
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInvEquiv_mul (x : S.leftInv) : (S.leftInvEquiv hS x : M) * x = 1 := by
simpa only [leftInvEquiv_apply, fromCommLeftInv] using fromLeftInv_mul S x
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_leftInvEquiv (x : S.leftInv) : (x : M) * S.leftInvEquiv hS x = 1 := by
simp only [leftInvEquiv_apply, fromCommLeftInv, mul_fromLeftInv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem leftInvEquiv_symm_mul (x : S) : ((S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x : M) * x = 1 := by
convert S.mul_leftInvEquiv hS ((S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x)
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_leftInvEquiv_symm (x : S) : (x : M) * (S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x = 1 := by
convert S.leftInvEquiv_mul hS ((S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x)
simp
end CommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group M] (S : Submonoid M)
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInv_eq_inv : S.leftInv = S⁻¹ :=
Submonoid.ext fun _ ↦
⟨fun h ↦ Submonoid.mem_inv.mpr ((inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h.choose_spec).symm ▸
h.choose.prop),
fun h ↦ ⟨⟨_, h⟩, mul_inv_cancel _⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fromLeftInv_eq_inv (x : S.leftInv) : (S.fromLeftInv x : M) = (x : M)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj (x : M), mul_inv_cancel, mul_fromLeftInv]
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup M] (S : Submonoid M) (hS : S ≤ IsUnit.submonoid M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| theorem leftInvEquiv_symm_eq_inv (x : S) : ((S.leftInvEquiv hS).symm x : M) = (x : M)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj (x : M), mul_inv_cancel, mul_leftInvEquiv_symm]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Submonoid/Inverses.lean | 202 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem mem_ground_of_mem_of_subset (hX : X ⊆ M.E) (heX : e ∈ X) : e ∈ M.E :=
hX heX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem insert_subset_ground {e : α} {X : Set α} {M : Matroid α}
(he : e ∈ M.E) (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : insert e X ⊆ M.E :=
insert_subset he hX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_subset_ground {M : Matroid α} : M.E ⊆ M.E :=
rfl.subset
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])] empty_subset union_subset iUnion_subset
end aesop
section IsBase
variable {B B₁ B₂ : Set α}
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBase.subset_ground (hB : M.IsBase B) : B ⊆ M.E :=
M.subset_ground B hB
theorem IsBase.exchange {e : α} (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hx : e ∈ B₁ \ B₂) :
∃ y ∈ B₂ \ B₁, M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) :=
M.isBase_exchange B₁ B₂ hB₁ hB₂ _ hx
theorem IsBase.exchange_mem {e : α}
(hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hxB₁ : e ∈ B₁) (hxB₂ : e ∉ B₂) :
∃ y, (y ∈ B₂ ∧ y ∉ B₁) ∧ M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) := by
simpa using hB₁.exchange hB₂ ⟨hxB₁, hxB₂⟩
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hB₁B₂ : B₁ ⊆ B₂) :
B₁ = B₂ :=
M.isBase_exchange.antichain hB₁ hB₂ hB₁B₂
theorem IsBase.not_isBase_of_ssubset {X : Set α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (hX : X ⊂ B) : ¬ M.IsBase X :=
fun h ↦ hX.ne (h.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hX.subset)
theorem IsBase.insert_not_isBase {e : α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) :
¬ M.IsBase (insert e B) :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isBase_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) hB
theorem IsBase.encard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
M.isBase_exchange.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂
theorem IsBase.ncard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).ncard = (B₂ \ B₁).ncard := by
rw [ncard_def, hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [M.isBase_exchange.encard_isBase_eq hB₁ hB₂]
theorem IsBase.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.ncard = B₂.ncard := by
rw [ncard_def B₁, hB₁.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.finite_of_finite {B' : Set α}
(hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Finite) (hB' : M.IsBase B') : B'.Finite :=
(finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB')).mp h
theorem IsBase.infinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) :
B₁.Infinite :=
by_contra (fun hB_inf ↦ (hB₁.finite_of_finite (not_infinite.mp hB_inf) hB).not_infinite h)
theorem IsBase.finite [RankFinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Finite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankFinite M›.exists_finite_isBase
hB₀.1.finite_of_finite hB₀.2 hB
theorem IsBase.infinite [RankInfinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Infinite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankInfinite M›.exists_infinite_isBase
hB₀.1.infinite_of_infinite hB₀.2 hB
theorem empty_not_isBase [h : RankPos M] : ¬M.IsBase ∅ :=
h.empty_not_isBase
theorem IsBase.nonempty [RankPos M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact M.empty_not_isBase hB
theorem IsBase.rankPos_of_nonempty (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
rw [rankPos_iff]
intro he
obtain rfl := he.eq_of_subset_isBase hB (empty_subset B)
simp at h
theorem IsBase.rankFinite_of_finite (hB : M.IsBase B) (hfin : B.Finite) : RankFinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, hfin⟩⟩
theorem IsBase.rankInfinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) : RankInfinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, h⟩⟩
theorem not_rankFinite (M : Matroid α) [RankInfinite M] : ¬ RankFinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem not_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) [RankFinite M] : ¬ RankInfinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem rankFinite_or_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : RankFinite M ∨ RankInfinite M :=
let ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
B.finite_or_infinite.imp hB.rankFinite_of_finite hB.rankInfinite_of_infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-27")] alias finite_or_rankInfinite := rankFinite_or_rankInfinite
@[simp]
theorem not_rankFinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankFinite M ↔ RankInfinite M :=
M.rankFinite_or_rankInfinite.elim (fun h ↦ iff_of_false (by simpa) M.not_rankInfinite)
fun h ↦ iff_of_true M.not_rankFinite h
@[simp]
theorem not_rankInfinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankInfinite M ↔ RankFinite M := by
rw [← not_rankFinite_iff, not_not]
theorem IsBase.diff_finite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Finite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Finite :=
finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem IsBase.diff_infinite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Infinite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Infinite :=
infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem ext_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B)) : M₁ = M₂ := by
have h' : ∀ B, M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B :=
fun B ↦ ⟨fun hB ↦ (h hB.subset_ground).1 hB,
fun hB ↦ (h <| hB.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm).2 hB⟩
ext <;> simp [hE, M₁.indep_iff', M₂.indep_iff', h']
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_isBase_iff_isBase_forall := ext_isBase
theorem ext_iff_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ M₁.E = M₂.E ∧ ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simp [h], fun ⟨hE, h⟩ ↦ ext_isBase hE h⟩
theorem isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) B := by
simp_rw [maximal_iff, and_iff_right hB, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨_, h, disjoint_sdiff_right⟩,
fun I hI B' ⟨hB', hIB'⟩ hBI ↦ hBI.antisymm ?_⟩, fun ⟨⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩,h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [hB'.eq_of_subset_isBase h, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl] at hIB'
· exact fun e he ↦ (hIB' he).elim (fun h' ↦ (h' (hI he)).elim) id
rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right hB'.subset_ground, disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hBI hIB'
rw [h diff_subset B' ⟨hB', disjoint_sdiff_left⟩]
· simpa [hB'.subset_ground]
simp [subset_diff, hB, hBB']
end IsBase
section dep_indep
/-- A subset of `M.E` is `Dep`endent if it is not `Indep`endent . -/
def Dep (M : Matroid α) (D : Set α) : Prop := ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E
variable {B B' I J D X : Set α} {e f : α}
theorem indep_iff : M.Indep I ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
M.indep_iff' (I := I)
theorem setOf_indep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {I | M.Indep I} = lowerClosure ({B | M.IsBase B}) := by
simp_rw [indep_iff, lowerClosure, LowerSet.coe_mk, mem_setOf, le_eq_subset]
theorem Indep.exists_isBase_superset (hI : M.Indep I) : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
indep_iff.1 hI
theorem dep_iff : M.Dep D ↔ ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E := Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_dep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {D | M.Dep D} = {I | M.Indep I}ᶜ ∩ Iic M.E := rfl
@[aesop unsafe 30% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Indep.subset_ground (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊆ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hIB.trans hB.subset_ground
@[aesop unsafe 20% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Dep.subset_ground (hD : M.Dep D) : D ⊆ M.E :=
hD.2
theorem indep_or_dep (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep X ∨ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
apply em
theorem Indep.not_dep (hI : M.Indep I) : ¬ M.Dep I :=
fun h ↦ h.1 hI
theorem Dep.not_indep (hD : M.Dep D) : ¬ M.Indep D :=
hD.1
theorem dep_of_not_indep (hD : ¬ M.Indep D) (hDE : D ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep D :=
⟨hD, hDE⟩
theorem indep_of_not_dep (hI : ¬ M.Dep I) (hIE : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep I :=
by_contra (fun h ↦ hI ⟨h, hIE⟩)
@[simp] theorem not_dep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Dep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX, not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_indep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Indep X ↔ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
theorem indep_iff_not_dep : M.Indep I ↔ ¬M.Dep I ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
rw [dep_iff, not_and, not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ h, h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem Indep.subset (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J) : M.Indep I := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hJB⟩ := hJ.exists_isBase_superset
exact indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, hIJ.trans hJB⟩
theorem Dep.superset (hD : M.Dep D) (hDX : D ⊆ X) (hXE : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep X :=
dep_of_not_indep (fun hI ↦ (hI.subset hDX).not_dep hD)
theorem IsBase.indep (hB : M.IsBase B) : M.Indep B :=
indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, subset_rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_indep (M : Matroid α) : M.Indep ∅ :=
Exists.elim M.exists_isBase (fun _ hB ↦ hB.indep.subset (empty_subset _))
theorem Dep.nonempty (hD : M.Dep D) : D.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact hD.not_indep M.empty_indep
theorem Indep.finite [RankFinite M] (hI : M.Indep I) : I.Finite :=
let ⟨_, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hB.finite.subset hIB
theorem Indep.rankPos_of_nonempty (hI : M.Indep I) (hne : I.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hB.rankPos_of_nonempty (hne.mono hIB)
theorem Indep.inter_right (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I ∩ X) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_left
theorem Indep.inter_left (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (X ∩ I) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_right
theorem Indep.diff (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I \ X) :=
hI.subset diff_subset
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hI : M.Indep I) (hBI : B ⊆ I) : B = I :=
let ⟨B', hB', hB'I⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hBI.antisymm (by rwa [hB.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' (hBI.trans hB'I)])
theorem isBase_iff_maximal_indep : M.IsBase B ↔ Maximal M.Indep B := by
rw [maximal_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.indep, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_subset_indep⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩ := h.exists_isBase_superset
rwa [h' hB'.indep hBB']
theorem Indep.isBase_of_maximal (hI : M.Indep I) (h : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → I = J) :
M.IsBase I := by
rwa [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff, and_iff_right hI]
theorem IsBase.dep_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B ⊂ X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep X :=
⟨fun hX ↦ h.ne (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hX h.subset), hX⟩
theorem IsBase.dep_of_insert (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) (he : e ∈ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep (insert e B) := hB.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) (insert_subset he hB.subset_ground)
theorem IsBase.mem_of_insert_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : M.Indep (insert e B)) : e ∈ B :=
by_contra fun he ↦ (hB.dep_of_insert he (heB.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _))).not_indep heB
/-- If the difference of two IsBases is a singleton, then they differ by an insertion/removal -/
theorem IsBase.eq_exchange_of_diff_eq_singleton (hB : M.IsBase B) (hB' : M.IsBase B')
(h : B \ B' = {e}) : ∃ f ∈ B' \ B, B' = (insert f B) \ {e} := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hb⟩ := hB.exchange hB' (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton e))
have hne : f ≠ e := by rintro rfl; exact hf.2 (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton f)).1
rw [insert_diff_singleton_comm hne] at hb
refine ⟨f, hf, (hb.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' ?_).symm⟩
rw [diff_subset_iff, insert_subset_iff, union_comm, ← diff_subset_iff, h, and_iff_left rfl.subset]
exact Or.inl hf.1
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f (B \ {e}))) : M.IsBase (insert f (B \ {e})) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
have hcard := hB'.encard_diff_comm hB
rw [insert_subset_iff, ← diff_eq_empty, diff_diff_comm, diff_eq_empty, subset_singleton_iff_eq]
at hIB'
obtain ⟨hfB, (h | h)⟩ := hIB'
· rw [h, encard_empty, encard_eq_zero, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at hcard
exact (hcard f ⟨hfB, hf⟩).elim
rw [h, encard_singleton, encard_eq_one] at hcard
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hcard
obtain (rfl : f = x) := hx.subset ⟨hfB, hf⟩
simp_rw [← h, ← singleton_union, ← hx, sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_eq_inter, inter_comm B,
diff_union_inter]
exact hB'
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep' (hB : M.IsBase B) (he : e ∈ B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f B \ {e})) : M.IsBase (insert f B \ {e}) := by
have hfe : f ≠ e := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem he hf |>.symm
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm hfe] at *
exact hB.exchange_isBase_of_indep hf hI
lemma insert_isBase_of_insert_indep {M : Matroid α} {I : Set α} {e f : α}
(he : e ∉ I) (hf : f ∉ I) (heI : M.IsBase (insert e I)) (hfI : M.Indep (insert f I)) :
M.IsBase (insert f I) := by
obtain rfl | hef := eq_or_ne e f
· assumption
simpa [diff_singleton_eq_self he, hfI]
using heI.exchange_isBase_of_indep (e := e) (f := f) (by simp [hef.symm, hf])
theorem IsBase.insert_dep (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : e ∈ M.E \ B) : M.Dep (insert e B) := by
rw [← not_indep_iff (insert_subset h.1 hB.subset_ground)]
exact h.2 ∘ (fun hi ↦ insert_eq_self.mp (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert e B)).symm)
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (hI : M.Indep I) (hI' : ¬M.IsBase I) (hB : M.IsBase B) :
∃ e ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
obtain ⟨x, hxB', hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (hIB'.ssubset_of_ne (by (rintro rfl; exact hI' hB')))
by_cases hxB : x ∈ B
· exact ⟨x, ⟨hxB, hx⟩, hB'.indep.subset (insert_subset hxB' hIB')⟩
obtain ⟨e,he, hBase⟩ := hB'.exchange hB ⟨hxB',hxB⟩
exact ⟨e, ⟨he.1, not_mem_subset hIB' he.2⟩,
indep_iff.2 ⟨_, hBase, insert_subset_insert (subset_diff_singleton hIB' hx)⟩⟩
/-- This is the same as `Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase`, but phrased so that
it is defeq to the augmentation axiom for independent sets. -/
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (M : Matroid α) ⦃I B : Set α⦄ (hI : M.Indep I)
(hInotmax : ¬ Maximal M.Indep I) (hB : Maximal M.Indep B) :
∃ x ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert x I) := by
simp only [maximal_subset_iff, hI, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, true_imp_iff] at hB hInotmax
refine hI.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (fun hIb ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hne⟩ := hInotmax
exact hne <| hIb.eq_of_subset_indep hII' hI'
exact hB.1.isBase_of_maximal fun J hJ hBJ ↦ hB.2 hJ hBJ
theorem Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (hB : M.Indep B)
(hBmax : ∀ e ∈ M.E \ B, ¬ M.Indep (insert e B)) : M.IsBase B := by
refine by_contra fun hnb ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨B', hB'⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨e, he, h⟩ := hB.exists_insert_of_not_isBase hnb hB'
exact hBmax e ⟨hB'.subset_ground he.1, he.2⟩ h
theorem ground_indep_iff_isBase : M.Indep M.E ↔ M.IsBase M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.isBase_of_maximal (fun _ hJ hEJ ↦ hEJ.antisymm hJ.subset_ground), IsBase.indep⟩
theorem IsBase.exists_insert_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (hIB : I ⊂ B) (hB' : M.IsBase B') :
∃ e ∈ B' \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) :=
(hB.indep.subset hIB.subset).exists_insert_of_not_isBase
(fun hI ↦ hIB.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hIB.subset)) hB'
@[ext] theorem ext_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I)) : M₁ = M₂ :=
have h' : M₁.Indep = M₂.Indep := by
ext I
by_cases hI : I ⊆ M₁.E
· rwa [h]
exact iff_of_false (fun hi ↦ hI hi.subset_ground)
(fun hi ↦ hI (hi.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm))
ext_isBase hE (fun B _ ↦ by simp_rw [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, h'])
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_indep
theorem ext_iff_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ (M₁.E = M₂.E) ∧ ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by (subst h; simp), fun h ↦ ext_indep h.1 h.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_iff_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_iff_indep
/-- If every base of `M₁` is independent in `M₂` and vice versa, then `M₁ = M₂`. -/
lemma ext_isBase_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(hM₁ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₁.IsBase B → M₂.Indep B) (hM₂ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₂.IsBase B → M₁.Indep B) : M₁ = M₂ := by
refine ext_indep hE fun I hIE ↦ ⟨fun hI ↦ ?_, fun hI ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₁ hB).subset hIB
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₂ hB).subset hIB
/-- A `Finitary` matroid is one where a set is independent if and only if it all
its finite subsets are independent, or equivalently a matroid whose circuits are finite. -/
@[mk_iff] class Finitary (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- `I` is independent if all its finite subsets are independent. -/
indep_of_forall_finite : ∀ I, (∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) → M.Indep I
theorem indep_of_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] (I : Set α)
(h : ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) : M.Indep I :=
Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I h
theorem indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] :
M.Indep I ↔ ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J :=
⟨fun h _ hJI _ ↦ h.subset hJI, Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I⟩
instance finitary_of_rankFinite {M : Matroid α} [RankFinite M] : Finitary M where
indep_of_forall_finite I hI := by
refine I.finite_or_infinite.elim (hI _ Subset.rfl) (fun h ↦ False.elim ?_)
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀I, hI₀fin, hI₀card⟩ := h.exists_subset_ncard_eq (B.ncard + 1)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hI₀B'⟩ := (hI _ hI₀I hI₀fin).exists_isBase_superset
have hle := ncard_le_ncard hI₀B' hB'.finite
rw [hI₀card, hB'.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase hB, Nat.add_one_le_iff] at hle
exact hle.ne rfl
/-- Matroids obey the maximality axiom -/
theorem existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (M : Matroid α) :
∀ X, X ⊆ M.E → ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty M.Indep X :=
M.maximality
end dep_indep
section copy
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with independence and base predicates and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps] def copy (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase Indep : Set α → Prop) (hE : E = M.E)
(hB : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) (hI : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α where
E := E
IsBase := IsBase
Indep := Indep
indep_iff' _ := by simp_rw [hI, hB, M.indep_iff]
exists_isBase := by
simp_rw [hB]
exact M.exists_isBase
isBase_exchange := by
simp_rw [show IsBase = M.IsBase from funext (by simp [hB])]
exact M.isBase_exchange
maximality := by
simp_rw [hE, show Indep = M.Indep from funext (by simp [hI])]
exact M.maximality
subset_ground := by
simp_rw [hE, hB]
exact M.subset_ground
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with an independence predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyIndep (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E M.IsBase Indep hE (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl) h
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with a base predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyBase (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E IsBase M.Indep hE h (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl)
end copy
section IsBasis
/-- A Basis for a set `X ⊆ M.E` is a maximal independent subset of `X`
(Often in the literature, the word 'Basis' is used to refer to what we call a 'Base'). -/
def IsBasis (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I ∧ X ⊆ M.E
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis := IsBasis
/-- `Matroid.IsBasis' I X` is the same as `Matroid.IsBasis I X`,
without the requirement that `X ⊆ M.E`. This is convenient for some
API building, especially when working with rank and closure. -/
def IsBasis' (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis' := IsBasis'
variable {B I J X Y : Set α} {e : α}
| theorem IsBasis'.indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1
theorem IsBasis.indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1.1
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 826 | 831 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Pythagorean Triples
The main result is the classification of Pythagorean triples. The final result is for general
Pythagorean triples. It follows from the more interesting relatively prime case. We use the
"rational parametrization of the circle" method for the proof. The parametrization maps the point
`(x / z, y / z)` to the slope of the line through `(-1 , 0)` and `(x / z, y / z)`. This quickly
shows that `(x / z, y / z) = (2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2), (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))` where
`m / n` is the slope. In order to identify numerators and denominators we now need results showing
that these are coprime. This is easy except for the prime 2. In order to deal with that we have to
analyze the parity of `x`, `y`, `m` and `n` and eliminate all the impossible cases. This takes up
the bulk of the proof below.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
noncomputable section
/-- Three integers `x`, `y`, and `z` form a Pythagorean triple if `x * x + y * y = z * z`. -/
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
/-- Pythagorean triples are interchangeable, i.e `x * x + y * y = y * y + x * x = z * z`.
This comes from additive commutativity. -/
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
/-- The zeroth Pythagorean triple is all zeros. -/
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ}
theorem eq (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
/-- A triple is still a triple if you multiply `x`, `y` and `z`
by a constant `k`. -/
theorem mul (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
/-- `(k*x, k*y, k*z)` is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
`(x, y, z)` is also a triple. -/
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
/-- A Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is “classified” if there exist integers `k, m, n` such that
either
* `x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)` and `y = k * (2 * m * n)`, or
* `x = k * (2 * m * n)` and `y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
/-- A primitive Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is a Pythagorean triple with `x` and `y` coprime.
Such a triple is “primitively classified” if there exist coprime integers `m, n` such that either
* `x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2` and `y = 2 * m * n`, or
* `x = 2 * m * n` and `y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
variable (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
include h
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx | hx <;>
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy | hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
obtain ⟨x0, hx2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hx)
obtain ⟨y0, hy2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hy)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
omega
theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
theorem ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 := by
suffices 0 < z * z by
rintro rfl
norm_num at this
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq]
have hc' : Int.gcd x y ≠ 0 := by
rw [hc]
exact one_ne_zero
rcases Int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz | hyz
· apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hxz) (sq_nonneg y)
· apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hyz)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hx : x = 0) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
subst x
change Nat.gcd 0 (Int.natAbs y) = 1 at hc
rw [Nat.gcd_zero_left (Int.natAbs y)] at hc
rcases Int.natAbs_eq y with hy | hy
· use 1, 0
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_right]
decide
· use 0, 1
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_left]
decide
theorem coprime_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : Int.gcd y z = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpy, hpz⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← hc]
apply Nat.dvd_gcd (Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp _ _) hpy
rw [sq, eq_sub_of_add_eq h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hpy hpz
exact dvd_sub (hpz.mul_right _) (hpy.mul_right _)
end PythagoreanTriple
section circleEquivGen
/-!
### A parametrization of the unit circle
For the classification of Pythagorean triples, we will use a parametrization of the unit circle.
-/
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- A parameterization of the unit circle that is useful for classifying Pythagorean triples.
(To be applied in the case where `K = ℚ`.) -/
def circleEquivGen (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
K ≃ { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } where
toFun x :=
⟨⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩, by
field_simp [hk x, div_pow]
ring, by
simp only [Ne, div_eq_iff (hk x), neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_inj]
simpa only [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, one_pow] using hk 1⟩
invFun p := (p : K × K).1 / ((p : K × K).2 + 1)
left_inv x := by
have h2 : (1 + 1 : K) = 2 := by norm_num
have h3 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2, h2]
field_simp [hk x, h2, add_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_cancel, mul_comm]
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, hy⟩ => by
change x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 at hxy
have h2 : y + 1 ≠ 0 := mt eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hy
have h3 : (y + 1) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 = 2 * (y + 1) := by
rw [(add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm).symm]
ring
have h4 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2]
ring
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
constructor
· field_simp [h3]
ring
· field_simp [h3]
rw [← add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm]
ring
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) (x : K) :
(circleEquivGen hk x : K × K) = ⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_symm_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0)
(v : { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 }) :
(circleEquivGen hk).symm v = (v : K × K).1 / ((v : K × K).2 + 1) :=
rfl
end circleEquivGen
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have h2m : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * m ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_add hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have h2n : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * n ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have hmc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs m := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2m
have hnc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs n := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2n
by_cases h2 : p = 2
· have h3 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 1 := by
simp only [sq, Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn, dvd_refl, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd]
decide
have h4 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 0 := by
apply Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
rwa [h2] at hp2
rw [h4] at h3
exact zero_ne_one h3
· apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Or.resolve_left hmc h2) (Or.resolve_left hnc h2)
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2), add_comm]
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have hnp : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ Int.gcd m n := by
rw [h]
norm_cast
exact mt Nat.dvd_one.mp (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp)
rcases Int.Prime.dvd_mul hp hp2 with hp2m | hpn
· rw [Int.natAbs_mul] at hp2m
rcases (Nat.Prime.dvd_mul hp).mp hp2m with hp2 | hpm
· have hp2' : p = 2 := (Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two hp2).antisymm hp.two_le
revert hp1
rw [hp2']
apply mt Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
simp only [sq, Nat.cast_ofNat, Int.sub_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn,
mul_zero, EuclideanDomain.zero_mod, mul_one, zero_sub]
decide
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpm)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : n * n = -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + m * m)]
exact hp1.neg_right.add ((Int.natCast_dvd.2 hpm).mul_right _)
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hnp
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : m * m = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 + n * n)]
apply dvd_add hp1
exact (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn).mul_right n
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : 2 * m * n = 2 * n * m), (by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2)]
apply coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(hmn : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) :
Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rcases hmn with h1 | h2
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd h h1.left h1.right
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even h h2.left h2.right
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨m0, hm2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hm)
obtain ⟨n0, hn2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hn)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hm2 hn2
subst m
subst n
have h1 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 + (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 + n0 ^ 2 + m0 + n0) + 1) := by
ring
have h2 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 - n0 ^ 2 + m0 - n0)) := by ring
have h3 : ((m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 := by
rw [h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left, Int.mul_emod_right]
decide
refine ⟨⟨_, h1⟩, ⟨_, h2⟩, h3, ?_⟩
| have h20 : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by decide
rw [h1, h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20]
by_contra h4
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp h4
apply hp.not_dvd_one
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 396 | 400 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
| /-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 431 | 444 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series (in one variable)
This file defines (univariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
Formal power series in one variable are defined from multivariate
power series as `PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
The file sets up the (semi)ring structure on univariate power series.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
Additional results can be found in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc`, truncation of power series;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse`, about inverses of power series,
and the fact that power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order`, the order of a power series at 0,
and application to the fact that power series over an integral domain
form an integral domain.
## Implementation notes
Because of its definition,
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
a lot of proofs and properties from the multivariate case
can be ported to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `Unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they were indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Formal power series over a coefficient type `R` -/
abbrev PowerSeries (R : Type*) :=
MvPowerSeries Unit R
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
-- Porting note: not available in Lean 4
-- local reducible PowerSeries
/--
`R⟦X⟧` is notation for `PowerSeries R`,
the semiring of formal power series in one variable over a semiring `R`.
-/
scoped notation:9000 R "⟦X⟧" => PowerSeries R
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Zero R] : Zero R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Semiring R] : Semiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Ring R] : Ring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S A⟦X⟧ :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance {A} [Semiring A] [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
end
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : R⟦X⟧ →ₗ[R] R :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series. -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.monomial R (single () n)
variable {R}
theorem coeff_def {s : Unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) : coeff R n = MvPowerSeries.coeff R s := by
rw [coeff, ← h, ← Finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
rw [← coeff_def]
· apply h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_coeff_eq_zero (φ : R⟦X⟧) : (∀ n, coeff R n φ = 0) ↔ φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext h, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc PowerSeries.ext_iff
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
subsingleton
/-- Constructor for formal power series. -/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : R⟦X⟧ := fun s => f (s ())
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ := MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial _ _ _
_ = if m = n then a else 0 := by simp only [Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
theorem monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial R n a = mk fun m => if m = n then a else 0 :=
ext fun m => by rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : R⟦X⟧ →+* R :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff Unit R
/-- The constant formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.C Unit R
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_eq {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] : algebraMap R R⟦X⟧ = C R := rfl
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring. -/
def X : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.X ()
theorem commute_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : Commute φ X :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X _ _
theorem X_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = φ * X :=
MvPowerSeries.X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X ^ n) :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X_pow _ _ _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * φ = φ * X ^ n :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R 0) = constantCoeff R := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero]
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 φ = constantCoeff R φ := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `rw; rfl` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [monomial, Finsupp.single_zero, MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C]
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a := by simp
theorem coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then a else 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a := by
rw [coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : coeff R n (C R a) = 0 := by
rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff R (n + 1) (C R a) = 0 :=
coeff_ne_zero_C n.succ_ne_zero
theorem C_injective : Function.Injective (C R) := by
intro a b H
simp_rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at H
simpa only [coeff_zero_C] using H 0
protected theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ ↔ Subsingleton R := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
rw [subsingleton_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun a b ↦ C_injective (h (C R a) (C R b))
theorem X_eq : (X : R⟦X⟧) = monomial R 1 1 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_X (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (X : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X : coeff R 0 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero, X, MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_X : coeff R 1 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 1 := by rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : (X : R⟦X⟧) ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simpa only [coeff_one_X, one_ne_zero, map_zero] using congr_arg (coeff R 1) H
theorem X_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n = monomial R n 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_eq _ n
theorem coeff_X_pow (m n : ℕ) : coeff R m ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = if m = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff R n ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = 1 := by
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (1 : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C n 1
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R 0 (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
| coeff_zero_C 1
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Basic.lean | 295 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,142 | 1,143 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AnnihilatingPolynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Instances
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Semisimple linear endomorphisms
Given an `R`-module `M` together with an `R`-linear endomorphism `f : M → M`, the following two
conditions are equivalent:
1. Every `f`-invariant submodule of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement.
2. `M` is a semisimple `R[X]`-module, where the action of the polynomial ring is induced by `f`.
A linear endomorphism `f` satisfying these equivalent conditions is known as a *semisimple*
endomorphism. We provide basic definitions and results about such endomorphisms in this file.
## Main definitions / results:
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple`: the definition that a linear endomorphism is semisimple
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`: the characterisation of semisimplicity in terms of invariant
submodules.
* `Module.End.eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple`: the zero endomorphism is the only endomorphism
that is both nilpotent and semisimple.
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_of_squarefree_aeval_eq_zero`: an endomorphism that is a root of a
square-free polynomial is semisimple (in finite dimensions over a field).
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple.minpoly_squarefree`: the minimal polynomial of a semisimple
endomorphism is squarefree.
* `IsSemisimple.of_mem_adjoin_pair`: every endomorphism in the subalgebra generated by two
commuting semisimple endomorphisms is semisimple, if the base field is perfect.
## TODO
In finite dimensions over a field:
* Triangularizable iff diagonalisable for semisimple endomorphisms
-/
open Set Function Polynomial
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
namespace Module.End
section CommRing
variable (f : End R M)
/-- A linear endomorphism of an `R`-module `M` is called *semisimple* if the induced `R[X]`-module
structure on `M` is semisimple. This is equivalent to saying that every `f`-invariant `R`-submodule
of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement: see `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`. -/
def IsSemisimple := IsSemisimpleModule R[X] (AEval' f)
/-- A weaker version of semisimplicity that only prescribes behaviour on finitely-generated
submodules. -/
def IsFinitelySemisimple : Prop :=
∀ p (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f), Module.Finite R p → IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp)
variable {f}
/-- A linear endomorphism is semisimple if every invariant submodule has in invariant complement.
See also `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`. -/
lemma isSemisimple_iff' :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ ∀ p : invtSubmodule f, ∃ q : invtSubmodule f, IsCompl p q := by
rw [IsSemisimple, IsSemisimpleModule, (AEval.mapSubmodule R M f).symm.complementedLattice_iff,
complementedLattice_iff]
rfl
lemma isSemisimple_iff :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ ∀ p ∈ invtSubmodule f, ∃ q ∈ invtSubmodule f, IsCompl p q := by
simp [isSemisimple_iff']
lemma isSemisimple_restrict_iff (p) (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f) :
IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp) ↔
∀ q ∈ f.invtSubmodule, q ≤ p → ∃ r ≤ p, r ∈ f.invtSubmodule ∧ Disjoint q r ∧ q ⊔ r = p := by
let e : Submodule R[X] (AEval' (f.restrict hp)) ≃o Iic (AEval.mapSubmodule R M f ⟨p, hp⟩) :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap <| AEval.restrict_equiv_mapSubmodule f p hp).trans
(Submodule.mapIic _)
simp_rw [IsSemisimple, IsSemisimpleModule, e.complementedLattice_iff, disjoint_iff,
← (OrderIso.Iic _ _).complementedLattice_iff, Iic.complementedLattice_iff, Subtype.forall,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.mk_le_mk, Sublattice.mk_inf_mk, Sublattice.mk_sup_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq,
exists_and_left, exists_and_right, invtSubmodule.mk_eq_bot_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc]
rfl
/-- A linear endomorphism is finitely semisimple if it is semisimple on every finitely-generated
invariant submodule.
See also `Module.End.isFinitelySemisimple_iff`. -/
lemma isFinitelySemisimple_iff' :
f.IsFinitelySemisimple ↔ ∀ p (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f),
Module.Finite R p → IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A characterisation of `Module.End.IsFinitelySemisimple` using only the lattice of submodules of
`M` (thus avoiding submodules of submodules). -/
lemma isFinitelySemisimple_iff :
f.IsFinitelySemisimple ↔ ∀ p ∈ invtSubmodule f, Module.Finite R p → ∀ q ∈ invtSubmodule f,
q ≤ p → ∃ r, r ≤ p ∧ r ∈ invtSubmodule f ∧ Disjoint q r ∧ q ⊔ r = p := by
simp_rw [isFinitelySemisimple_iff', isSemisimple_restrict_iff]
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_zero [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (0 : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_id [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (LinearMap.id : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp] lemma isSemisimple_neg : (-f).IsSemisimple ↔ f.IsSemisimple := by
simp [isSemisimple_iff, mem_invtSubmodule]
variable (f) in
protected lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isSemisimple_iff {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
(g : End R M₂) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (he : e ∘ₗ f = g ∘ₗ e) :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ g.IsSemisimple := by
let e : AEval' f ≃ₗ[R[X]] AEval' g := LinearEquiv.ofAEval _ (e.trans (AEval'.of g)) fun x ↦ by
simpa [AEval'.X_smul_of] using LinearMap.congr_fun he x
exact (Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e).complementedLattice_iff
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple (hn : IsNilpotent f) (hs : f.IsSemisimple) : f = 0 := by
have ⟨n, h0⟩ := hn
rw [← aeval_X (R := R) f]; rw [← aeval_X_pow (R := R) f] at h0
rw [← RingHom.mem_ker, ← AEval.annihilator_eq_ker_aeval (M := M)] at h0 ⊢
exact hs.annihilator_isRadical _ _ ⟨n, h0⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_of_isFinitelySemisimple
(hn : IsNilpotent f) (hs : IsFinitelySemisimple f) : f = 0 := by
have (p) (hp₁ : p ∈ f.invtSubmodule) (hp₂ : Module.Finite R p) : f.restrict hp₁ = 0 := by
specialize hs p hp₁ hp₂
replace hn : IsNilpotent (f.restrict hp₁) := isNilpotent.restrict hp₁ hn
exact eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple hn hs
ext x
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : f ^ k = 0⟩ := hn
let p := Submodule.span R {(f ^ i) x | (i : ℕ) (_ : i ≤ k)}
have hp₁ : p ∈ f.invtSubmodule := by
| simp only [mem_invtSubmodule, p, Submodule.span_le]
rintro - ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Semisimple.lean | 141 | 143 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
/-!
# Binary map of options
This file defines the binary map of `Option`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations
on intervals.
## Main declarations
* `Option.map₂`: Binary map of options.
## Notes
This file is very similar to the n-ary section of `Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic`, to
`Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry` and to `Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
We do not define `Option.map₃` as its only purpose so far would be to prove properties of
`Option.map₂` and casing already fulfills this task.
-/
universe u
open Function
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {f : α → β → γ} {a : Option α} {b : Option β} {c : Option γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Option α → Option β → Option γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) : Option γ :=
a.bind fun a => b.map <| f a
/-- `Option.map₂` in terms of monadic operations. Note that this can't be taken as the definition
because of the lack of universe polymorphism. -/
theorem map₂_def {α β γ : Type u} (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ f a b = f <$> a <*> b := by
cases a <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_some_some (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f (some a) (some b) = f a b := rfl
theorem map₂_coe_coe (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = f a b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_left (f : α → β → γ) (b : Option β) : map₂ f none b = none := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) : map₂ f a none = none := by cases a <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_coe_left (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : Option β) : map₂ f a b = b.map fun b => f a b :=
rfl
-- Porting note: This proof was `rfl` in Lean3, but now is not.
@[simp]
theorem map₂_coe_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : β) :
map₂ f a b = a.map fun a => f a b := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem mem_map₂_iff {c : γ} : c ∈ map₂ f a b ↔ ∃ a' b', a' ∈ a ∧ b' ∈ b ∧ f a' b' = c := by
simp [map₂, bind_eq_some]
/-- `simp`-normal form of `mem_map₂_iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_some_iff {c : γ} :
map₂ f a b = some c ↔ ∃ a' b', a' ∈ a ∧ b' ∈ b ∧ f a' b' = c := by
simp [map₂, bind_eq_some]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_none_iff : map₂ f a b = none ↔ a = none ∨ b = none := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem map₂_swap (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ f a b = map₂ (fun a b => f b a) b a := by cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
theorem map_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(map₂ f a b).map g = map₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
theorem map₂_map_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
map₂ f (a.map g) b = map₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) a b := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem map₂_map_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
map₂ f a (b.map g) = map₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) a b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ (curry f) a b = Option.map f (map₂ Prod.mk a b) := (map_map₂ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem map_uncurry (f : α → β → γ) (x : Option (α × β)) :
x.map (uncurry f) = map₂ f (x.map Prod.fst) (x.map Prod.snd) := by cases x <;> rfl
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Option.map₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `map₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `map₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`map₂ (*) a b = map₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
| variable {α' β' δ' ε ε' : Type*}
| Mathlib/Data/Option/NAry.lean | 109 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
| μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 230 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Galois.Decomposition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IndYoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Ulift
/-!
# Pro-Representability of fiber functors
We show that any fiber functor is pro-representable, i.e. there exists a pro-object
`X : I ⥤ C` such that `F` is naturally isomorphic to the colimit of `X ⋙ coyoneda`.
From this we deduce the canonical isomorphism of `Aut F` with the limit over the automorphism
groups of all Galois objects.
## Main definitions
- `PointedGaloisObject`: the category of pointed Galois objects
- `PointedGaloisObject.cocone`: a cocone on `(PointedGaloisObject.incl F).op ≫ coyoneda` with
point `F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl`.
- `autGaloisSystem`: the system of automorphism groups indexed by the pointed Galois objects.
## Main results
- `PointedGaloisObject.isColimit`: the cocone `PointedGaloisObject.cocone` is a colimit cocone.
- `autMulEquivAutGalois`: `Aut F` is canonically isomorphic to the limit over the automorphism
groups of all Galois objects.
- `FiberFunctor.isPretransitive_of_isConnected`: The `Aut F` action on the fiber of a connected
object is transitive.
## Implementation details
The pro-representability statement and the isomorphism of `Aut F` with the limit over the
automorphism groups of all Galois objects naturally forces `F` to take values in `FintypeCat.{u₂}`
where `u₂` is the `Hom`-universe of `C`. Since this is used to show that `Aut F` acts
transitively on `F.obj X` for connected `X`, we a priori only obtain this result for
the mentioned specialized universe setup. To obtain the result for `F` taking values in an arbitrary
`FintypeCat.{w}`, we postcompose with an equivalence `FintypeCat.{w} ≌ FintypeCat.{u₂}` and apply
the specialized result.
In the following the section `Specialized` is reserved for the setup where `F` takes values in
`FintypeCat.{u₂}` and the section `General` contains results holding for `F` taking values in
an arbitrary `FintypeCat.{w}`.
## References
* [lenstraGSchemes]: H. W. Lenstra. Galois theory for schemes.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ w
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace PreGaloisCategory
open Limits Functor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂} C] [GaloisCategory C]
/-- A pointed Galois object is a Galois object with a fixed point of its fiber. -/
structure PointedGaloisObject (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) : Type (max u₁ u₂ w) where
/-- The underlying object of `C`. -/
obj : C
/-- An element of the fiber of `obj`. -/
pt : F.obj obj
/-- `obj` is Galois. -/
isGalois : IsGalois obj := by infer_instance
namespace PointedGaloisObject
section General
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w})
attribute [instance] isGalois
instance (X : PointedGaloisObject F) : CoeDep (PointedGaloisObject F) X C where
coe := X.obj
variable {F} in
/-- The type of homomorphisms between two pointed Galois objects. This is a homomorphism
of the underlying objects of `C` that maps the distinguished points to each other. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : PointedGaloisObject F) where
/-- The underlying homomorphism of `C`. -/
val : A.obj ⟶ B.obj
/-- The distinguished point of `A` is mapped to the distinguished point of `B`. -/
comp : F.map val A.pt = B.pt := by simp
attribute [simp] Hom.comp
/-- The category of pointed Galois objects. -/
instance : Category.{u₂} (PointedGaloisObject F) where
Hom A B := Hom A B
id A := { val := 𝟙 (A : C) }
comp {A B C} f g := { val := f.val ≫ g.val }
instance {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} : Coe (Hom A B) (A.obj ⟶ B.obj) where
coe f := f.val
variable {F}
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} {f g : A ⟶ B} (h : f.val = g.val) : f = g :=
Hom.ext h
@[simp]
lemma id_val (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : 𝟙 A = 𝟙 A.obj :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma comp_val {A B C : PointedGaloisObject F} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C) :
(f ≫ g).val = f.val ≫ g.val :=
rfl
variable (F)
/-- The canonical functor from pointed Galois objects to `C`. -/
def incl : PointedGaloisObject F ⥤ C where
obj := fun A ↦ A
map := fun ⟨f, _⟩ ↦ f
@[simp]
lemma incl_obj (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : (incl F).obj A = A :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma incl_map {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} (f : A ⟶ B) : (incl F).map f = f.val :=
rfl
end General
section Specialized
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{u₂})
/-- `F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl` as a cocone over `(can F).op ⋙ coyoneda`.
This is a colimit cocone (see `PreGaloisCategory.isColimìt`) -/
def cocone : Cocone ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) where
pt := F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl
ι := {
app := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ↦ { app := fun X (f : (A : C) ⟶ X) ↦ F.map f a }
naturality := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ⟨f, (hf : F.map f b = a)⟩ ↦ by
ext Y (g : (A : C) ⟶ Y)
suffices h : F.map g (F.map f b) = F.map g a by simpa
rw [hf]
}
@[simp]
lemma cocone_app (A : PointedGaloisObject F) (B : C) (f : (A : C) ⟶ B) :
((cocone F).ι.app ⟨A⟩).app B f = F.map f A.pt :=
rfl
variable [FiberFunctor F]
/-- The category of pointed Galois objects is cofiltered. -/
instance : IsCofilteredOrEmpty (PointedGaloisObject F) where
cone_objs := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨Z, f, z, hgal, hfz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F (A ⨯ B)
<| (fiberBinaryProductEquiv F A B).symm (a, b)
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, ⟨f ≫ prod.fst, ?_⟩, ⟨f ≫ prod.snd, ?_⟩, trivial⟩
· simp only [F.map_comp, hfz, FintypeCat.comp_apply, fiberBinaryProductEquiv_symm_fst_apply]
· simp only [F.map_comp, hfz, FintypeCat.comp_apply, fiberBinaryProductEquiv_symm_snd_apply]
cone_maps := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨Z, h, z, hgal, hhz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F A a
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, ⟨h, hhz⟩, hom_ext ?_⟩
apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F Z B z
simp [hhz, hf, hg]
/-- `cocone F` is a colimit cocone, i.e. `F` is pro-represented by `incl F`. -/
noncomputable def isColimit : IsColimit (cocone F) := by
refine evaluationJointlyReflectsColimits _ (fun X ↦ ?_)
refine Types.FilteredColimit.isColimitOf _ _ ?_ ?_
· intro (x : F.obj X)
obtain ⟨Y, i, y, h1, _, _⟩ := fiber_in_connected_component F X x
obtain ⟨Z, f, z, hgal, hfz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F Y y
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, f ≫ i, ?_⟩
simp only [mapCocone_ι_app, evaluation_obj_map, cocone_app, map_comp,
← h1, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hfz]
· intro ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ (u : (A : C) ⟶ X) (v : (B : C) ⟶ X) (h : F.map u a = F.map v b)
obtain ⟨⟨Z, z, _⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, _⟩ :=
IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs (C := (PointedGaloisObject F)ᵒᵖ)
⟨{ obj := A, pt := a}⟩ ⟨{obj := B, pt := b}⟩
refine ⟨⟨{ obj := Z, pt := z }⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, ?_⟩
apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F Z X z
change F.map (f ≫ u) z = F.map (g ≫ v) z
rw [map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hf, map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hg, h]
instance : HasColimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) where
exists_colimit := ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩
end Specialized
end PointedGaloisObject
open PointedGaloisObject
section Specialized
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{u₂})
/-- The diagram sending each pointed Galois object to its automorphism group
as an object of `C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def autGaloisSystem : PointedGaloisObject F ⥤ Grp.{u₂} where
obj := fun A ↦ Grp.of <| Aut (A : C)
map := fun {A B} f ↦ Grp.ofHom (autMapHom f)
/-- The limit of `autGaloisSystem`. -/
noncomputable def AutGalois : Type (max u₁ u₂) :=
(autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).sections
noncomputable instance : Group (AutGalois F) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Group (autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).sections
/-- The canonical projection from `AutGalois F` to the `C`-automorphism group of each
pointed Galois object. -/
noncomputable def AutGalois.π (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : AutGalois F →* Aut (A : C) :=
Grp.sectionsπMonoidHom (autGaloisSystem F) A
/- Not a `simp` lemma, because we usually don't want to expose the internals here. -/
lemma AutGalois.π_apply (A : PointedGaloisObject F) (x : AutGalois F) :
AutGalois.π F A x = x.val A :=
rfl
lemma autGaloisSystem_map_surjective ⦃A B : PointedGaloisObject F⦄ (f : A ⟶ B) :
Function.Surjective ((autGaloisSystem F).map f) := by
intro (φ : Aut B.obj)
obtain ⟨ψ, hψ⟩ := autMap_surjective_of_isGalois f.val φ
use ψ
simp only [autGaloisSystem_map]
exact hψ
/-- Equality of elements of `AutGalois F` can be checked on the projections on each pointed
Galois object. -/
lemma AutGalois.ext {f g : AutGalois F}
(h : ∀ (A : PointedGaloisObject F), AutGalois.π F A f = AutGalois.π F A g) : f = g := by
dsimp only [AutGalois]
ext A
exact h A
variable [FiberFunctor F]
/-- `autGalois.π` is surjective for every pointed Galois object. -/
theorem AutGalois.π_surjective (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
Function.Surjective (AutGalois.π F A) := fun (σ : Aut A.obj) ↦ by
have (i : PointedGaloisObject F) : Finite ((autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).obj i) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Finite (Aut (i.obj))
exact eval_section_surjective_of_surjective
(autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _) (autGaloisSystem_map_surjective F) A σ
section EndAutGaloisIsomorphism
/-!
### Isomorphism between `Aut F` and `AutGalois F`
In this section we establish the isomorphism between the automorphism group of `F` and
the limit over the automorphism groups of all Galois objects.
We first establish the isomorphism between `End F` and `AutGalois F`, from which we deduce that
`End F` is a group, hence `End F = Aut F`. The isomorphism is built in multiple steps:
- `endEquivSectionsFibers : End F ≅ (incl F ⋙ F').sections`: the endomorphisms of
`F` are isomorphic to the limit over `F.obj A` for all Galois objects `A`.
This is obtained as the composition (slightly simplified):
`End F ≅ (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F) ≅ (incl F ⋙ F).sections`
Where the first isomorphism is induced from the pro-representability of `F` and the second one
from the pro-coyoneda lemma.
- `endEquivAutGalois : End F ≅ AutGalois F`: this is the composition of `endEquivSectionsFibers`
with:
`(incl F ⋙ F).sections ≅ (autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget Grp).sections`
which is induced from the level-wise equivalence `Aut A ≃ F.obj A` for a Galois object `A`.
-/
-- Local notation for `F` considered as a functor to types instead of finite types.
local notation "F'" => F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl
/-- The endomorphisms of `F` are isomorphic to the limit over the fibers of `F` on all
Galois objects. -/
noncomputable def endEquivSectionsFibers : End F ≃ (incl F ⋙ F').sections :=
let i1 : End F ≃ End F' :=
(FullyFaithful.whiskeringRight (FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful FintypeCat.incl) C).homEquiv
let i2 : End F' ≅ (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F') :=
(yoneda.obj (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl)).mapIso (colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩).op
let i3 : (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F') ≅ limit ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}) :=
colimitCoyonedaHomIsoLimit' (incl F) F'
let i4 : limit (incl F ⋙ F' ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}) ≃ ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}).sections :=
Types.limitEquivSections (incl F ⋙ (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁, u₂})
let i5 : ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}).sections ≃ (incl F ⋙ F').sections :=
(Types.sectionsEquiv (incl F ⋙ F')).symm
i1.trans <| i2.toEquiv.trans <| i3.toEquiv.trans <| i4.trans i5
@[simp]
lemma endEquivSectionsFibers_π (f : End F) (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
(endEquivSectionsFibers F f).val A = f.app A A.pt := by
dsimp [endEquivSectionsFibers, Types.sectionsEquiv]
erw [Types.limitEquivSections_apply]
simp only [colimitCoyonedaHomIsoLimit'_π_apply, incl_obj, comp_obj, FintypeCat.incl_obj, op_obj,
FunctorToTypes.comp]
change (((FullyFaithful.whiskeringRight (FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful
FintypeCat.incl) C).homEquiv) f).app A
| (((colimit.ι _ _) ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩).hom).app
A _) = f.app A A.pt
simp
rfl
/-- Functorial isomorphism `Aut A ≅ F.obj A` for Galois objects `A`. -/
noncomputable def autIsoFibers :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Galois/Prorepresentability.lean | 315 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Pointwise.Stabilizer
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-! # Blocks
Given `SMul G X`, an action of a type `G` on a type `X`, we define
- the predicate `MulAction.IsBlock G B` states that `B : Set X` is a block,
which means that the sets `g • B`, for `g ∈ G`, are equal or disjoint.
Under `Group G` and `MulAction G X`, this is equivalent to the classical
definition `MulAction.IsBlock.def_one`
- a bunch of lemmas that give examples of “trivial” blocks : ⊥, ⊤, singletons,
and non trivial blocks: orbit of the group, orbit of a normal subgroup…
The non-existence of nontrivial blocks is the definition of primitive actions.
## Results for actions on finite sets
- `MulAction.IsBlock.ncard_block_mul_ncard_orbit_eq` : The cardinality of a block
multiplied by the number of its translates is the cardinal of the ambient type
- `MulAction.IsBlock.eq_univ_of_card_lt` : a too large block is equal to `Set.univ`
- `MulAction.IsBlock.subsingleton_of_card_lt` : a too small block is a subsingleton
- `MulAction.IsBlock.of_subset` : the intersections of the translates of a finite subset
that contain a given point is a block
- `MulAction.BlockMem` : the type of blocks containing a given element
- `MulAction.BlockMem.instBoundedOrder` :
the type of blocks containing a given element is a bounded order.
## References
We follow [Wielandt-1964].
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
section orbits
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.eq_or_disjoint (a b : X) :
orbit G a = orbit G b ∨ Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b) := by
apply (em (Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b))).symm.imp _ id
simp +contextual
only [Set.not_disjoint_iff, ← orbit_eq_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp, eq_comm, implies_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.pairwiseDisjoint :
(Set.range fun x : X => orbit G x).PairwiseDisjoint id := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩ t ⟨y, rfl⟩ h
contrapose! h
exact (orbit.eq_or_disjoint x y).resolve_right h
/-- Orbits of an element form a partition -/
@[to_additive "Orbits of an element form a partition"]
theorem IsPartition.of_orbits :
Setoid.IsPartition (Set.range fun a : X => orbit G a) := by
apply orbit.pairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty
· intro x
exact ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_orbit_self x⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha : orbit G a = ∅⟩
exact (MulAction.orbit_nonempty a).ne_empty ha
end orbits
section SMul
variable (G : Type*) {X : Type*} [SMul G X] {B : Set X} {a : X}
-- Change terminology to IsFullyInvariant?
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g • B = B` for all `g : G`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g +ᵥ B = B` for all `g : G`."]
def IsFixedBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B = B
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g • B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
"A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g +ᵥ B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. "]
def IsInvariantBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B ⊆ B
|
section IsTrivialBlock
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Blocks.lean | 102 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjointAux_inner_right, adjointAux_inner_left]
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_norm (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖adjointAux A‖ = ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
· nth_rw 1 [← adjointAux_adjointAux A]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
| rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
/-- The adjoint of a bounded operator `A` from a Hilbert space `E` to another Hilbert space `F`,
denoted as `A†`. -/
def adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective { adjointAux with norm_map' := adjointAux_norm } fun A =>
⟨adjointAux A, adjointAux_adjointAux A⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 99 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop
/-! # Structures involving `*` and `0` on `WithTop` and `WithBot`
The main results of this section are `WithTop.instOrderedCommSemiring` and
`WithBot.instOrderedCommSemiring`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace WithTop
variable [DecidableEq α]
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {a b : WithTop α}
instance instMulZeroClass : MulZeroClass (WithTop α) where
zero := 0
mul
| (a : α), (b : α) => ↑(a * b)
| (a : α), ⊤ => if a = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| ⊤, (b : α) => if b = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| ⊤, ⊤ => ⊤
mul_zero
| (a : α) => congr_arg some <| mul_zero _
| ⊤ => if_pos rfl
zero_mul
| (b : α) => congr_arg some <| zero_mul _
| ⊤ => if_pos rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (a b : α) : (↑(a * b) : WithTop α) = a * b := rfl
lemma mul_top' : ∀ (a : WithTop α), a * ⊤ = if a = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| (a : α) => if_congr coe_eq_zero.symm rfl rfl
| ⊤ => (if_neg top_ne_zero).symm
@[simp] lemma mul_top (h : a ≠ 0) : a * ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [mul_top', if_neg h]
lemma top_mul' : ∀ (b : WithTop α), ⊤ * b = if b = 0 then 0 else ⊤
| (b : α) => if_congr coe_eq_zero.symm rfl rfl
| | ⊤ => (if_neg top_ne_zero).symm
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/WithTop.lean | 49 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubsemiring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubsemiring A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = U.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
theorem mem_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) {x} : x ∈ S.toSubmodule ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubmodule : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Submodule R A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, h]
theorem toSubmodule_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = U.toSubmodule ↔ S = U :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a non-unital subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.copy s hs with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : a ∈ s) => by
show r • a ∈ s
rw [hs] at ha ⊢
exact S.smul_mem' r ha }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring)⟩
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := @fun _ x hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
/-- A non-unital subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section
/-! `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiring` / `Semiring`
coercions. -/
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `Submodule` as an `OrderEmbedding` -/
def toSubmodule' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o Submodule R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toSubmodule
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubsemiring' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubsemiring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubring' [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
variable {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A}
section
/-! ### `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance instModule' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.instModule'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toSubmodule.isScalarTower
instance [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
end
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_subtype :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
/-- Linear equivalence between `S : Submodule R A` and `S`. Though these types are equal,
we define it as a `LinearEquiv` to avoid type equalities. -/
def toSubmoduleEquiv (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : S.toSubmodule ≃ₗ[R] S :=
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ rfl
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Transport a non-unital subalgebra via an algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r b hb => by
rcases hb with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact map_smulₛₗ f r a ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem' r ha) }
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} : y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map
theorem map_toSubmodule {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
-- TODO: introduce a better coercion from `NonUnitalAlgHomClass` to `LinearMap`
(map f S).toSubmodule = Submodule.map (LinearMapClass.linearMap f) S.toSubmodule :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : (map f S : Set B) = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital subalgebra under an algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.comap (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (r • a) ∈ S from (map_smulₛₗ f r a).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r ha }
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
GaloisConnection (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : (comap f S : Set A) = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance noZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace Submodule
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
/-- A submodule closed under multiplication is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul : ∀ x y, x ∈ p → y ∈ p → x * y ∈ p) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ p with
mul_mem' := h_mul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {p : Submodule R A} {h_mul} {x} :
x ∈ p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul : Set A) = p :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_mk (p : Submodule R A) hmul :
p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hmul =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mk ⟨⟨⟨p, p.add_mem⟩, p.zero_mem⟩, hmul _ _⟩ p.smul_mem' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toSubmodule (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul).toSubmodule = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toSubmodule.toNonUnitalSubalgebra fun _ _ => mul_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end Submodule
namespace NonUnitalAlgHom
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a non-unital subalgebra. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := NonUnitalRingHom.srange (φ : A →ₙ+* B)
smul_mem' := fun r a => by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r • a, map_smul φ r a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) := by
ext
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]
rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →ₙₐ[R] S :=
{ NonUnitalRingHom.codRestrict (f : A →ₙ+* B) S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring hf with
map_smul' := fun r a => Subtype.ext <| map_smul f r a }
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) : A →ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f) (NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := {a | (ϕ a : B) = ψ a}
zero_mem' := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_zero, map_zero]
add_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
mul_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_mul, map_mul, hx, hy]
smul_mem' r x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_smul, map_smul, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The range of a morphism of algebras is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note that this instance can cause a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` if `B` is also a fintype. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype A] [DecidableEq B] (φ : F) :
Fintype (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ) :=
Set.fintypeRange φ
end NonUnitalAlgHom
namespace NonUnitalAlgebra
variable {F : Type*} (R : Type u) {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
section IsScalarTower
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) with
mul_mem' :=
@fun a b (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A))
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A)) =>
show a * b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ha
· refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hb
· exact fun x (hx : x ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) y
(hy : y ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) => Submodule.subset_span (mul_mem hy hx)
· exact fun x _hx => (mul_zero x).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy z hz => (mul_add z x y).symm ▸ add_mem (hx z hz) (hy z hz)
· exact fun r x _ hx y hy =>
(mul_smul_comm r y x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (hx y hy)
· exact (zero_mul b).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ => (add_mul x y b).symm ▸ add_mem
· exact fun r x _ hx => (smul_mul_assoc r x b).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx }
theorem adjoin_toSubmodule (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin {s : Set A} : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (Set.mem_singleton x)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) :=
fun s S =>
⟨fun H => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span).trans H,
fun H => show Submodule.span R _ ≤ S.toSubmodule from Submodule.span_le.mpr <|
show NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring from
NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_le.2 H⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalAlgebra.gi
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_union (s t : Set A) : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = adjoin R s ⊔ adjoin R t :=
(NonUnitalAlgebra.gc : GaloisConnection _ ((↑) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Set A)).l_sup
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R)
/-- If some predicate holds for all `x ∈ (s : Set A)` and this predicate is closed under the
`algebraMap`, addition, multiplication and star operations, then it holds for `a ∈ adjoin R s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ r x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
{x} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) : p x hx :=
let S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
add_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hb⟩)
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
adjoin_le (S := S) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_adjoin R hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction₂ {s : Set A} {p : ∀ x y, x ∈ adjoin R s → y ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_adjoin R hx) (subset_adjoin R hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
(smul_left : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p (r • x) y (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx) hy)
(smul_right : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p x (r • y) hx (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hy))
{x y : A} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) (hy : y ∈ adjoin R s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using adjoin_induction with
| mem z hz =>
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ _ h hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_left _ _ _ _ _ h
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_right _ _ _ _ _ h
open Submodule in
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) : (adjoin R s).toSubmodule = span R (Subsemigroup.closure s) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem x hx => exact subset_span <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure hx
| add x y _ _ hpx hpy => exact add_mem hpx hpy
| zero => exact zero_mem _
| mul x y _ _ hpx hpy =>
apply span_induction₂ ?Hs (by simp) (by simp) ?Hadd_l ?Hadd_r ?Hsmul_l ?Hsmul_r hpx hpy
case Hs => exact fun x y hx hy ↦ subset_span <| mul_mem hx hy
case Hadd_l => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [add_mul] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hadd_r => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [mul_add] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hsmul_l => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [smul_mul_assoc] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
case Hsmul_r => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [mul_smul_comm] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
| smul r x _ hpx => exact smul_mem _ _ hpx
· apply span_le.2 _
show Subsemigroup.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).toSubsemigroup
exact Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (subset_adjoin R)
variable (R A)
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : Set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥ by apply GaloisConnection.l_bot; exact NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ : adjoin R (Set.univ : Set A) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun _x hx => subset_adjoin R hx
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (s : Set A) : map f (adjoin R s) = adjoin R (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc
NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc fun _t => rfl
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
@[simp]
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin_singleton [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (x : A) : map f (adjoin R {x}) = adjoin R {f x} := by
simp [NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin]
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : (↑(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toSubmodule = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
[IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule'.injective.eq_iff' top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem to_subring_eq_top {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff' top_toSubring
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_left
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_right
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) :
x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
theorem map_sup [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊔ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_inf [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊓ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊓ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set A) = (S : Set A) ∩ T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubmodule = S.toSubmodule ⊓ T.toSubmodule :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S ⊓ T).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ⊓ T.toNonUnitalSubsemiring :=
| rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set A) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 774 | 777 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.MvPolynomial
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Cramer's rule and adjugate matrices
The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
It is calculated with Cramer's rule, which we introduce first.
The vectors returned by Cramer's rule are given by the linear map `cramer`,
which sends a matrix `A` and vector `b` to the vector consisting of the
determinant of replacing the `i`th column of `A` with `b` at index `i`
(written as `(A.update_column i b).det`).
Using Cramer's rule, we can compute for each matrix `A` the matrix `adjugate A`.
The entries of the adjugate are the minors of `A`.
Instead of defining a minor by deleting row `i` and column `j` of `A`, we
replace the `i`th row of `A` with the `j`th basis vector; the resulting matrix
has the same determinant but more importantly equals Cramer's rule applied
to `A` and the `j`th basis vector, simplifying the subsequent proofs.
We prove the adjugate behaves like `det A • A⁻¹`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.cramer A b`: the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
* `Matrix.adjugate A`: the adjugate (or classical adjoint) of the matrix `A`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u v w
variable {m : Type u} {n : Type v} {α : Type w}
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [CommRing α]
open Matrix Polynomial Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
section Cramer
/-!
### `cramer` section
Introduce the linear map `cramer` with values defined by `cramerMap`.
After defining `cramerMap` and showing it is linear,
we will restrict our proofs to using `cramer`.
-/
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α)
/-- `cramerMap A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramerMap A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramerMap A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramerMap` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramerMap (i : n) : α :=
(A.updateCol i b).det
theorem cramerMap_is_linear (i : n) : IsLinearMap α fun b => cramerMap A b i :=
{ map_add := det_updateCol_add _ _
map_smul := det_updateCol_smul _ _ }
theorem cramer_is_linear : IsLinearMap α (cramerMap A) := by
constructor <;> intros <;> ext i
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).1
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).2
/-- `cramer A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramer A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramer A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramer` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramer (A : Matrix n n α) : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (n → α) :=
IsLinearMap.mk' (cramerMap A) (cramer_is_linear A)
theorem cramer_apply (i : n) : cramer A b i = (A.updateCol i b).det :=
rfl
theorem cramer_transpose_apply (i : n) : cramer Aᵀ b i = (A.updateRow i b).det := by
rw [cramer_apply, updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
theorem cramer_transpose_row_self (i : n) : Aᵀ.cramer (A i) = Pi.single i A.det := by
ext j
rw [cramer_apply, Pi.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· -- i = j: this entry should be `A.det`
subst h
simp only [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose, updateRow_eq_self]
· -- i ≠ j: this entry should be 0
rw [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
apply det_zero_of_row_eq h
rw [updateRow_self, updateRow_ne (Ne.symm h)]
theorem cramer_row_self (i : n) (h : ∀ j, b j = A j i) : A.cramer b = Pi.single i A.det := by
rw [← transpose_transpose A, det_transpose]
convert cramer_transpose_row_self Aᵀ i
exact funext h
@[simp]
theorem cramer_one : cramer (1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext i j
convert congr_fun (cramer_row_self (1 : Matrix n n α) (Pi.single i 1) i _) j
· simp
· intro j
rw [Matrix.one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm]
theorem cramer_smul (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α) :
cramer (r • A) = r ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • cramer A :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => funext fun _ => det_updateCol_smul_left _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem cramer_subsingleton_apply [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (i : n) :
cramer A b i = b i := by rw [cramer_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i, updateCol_self]
theorem cramer_zero [Nontrivial n] : cramer (0 : Matrix n n α) = 0 := by
ext i j
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j'
intro j''
simp [updateCol_ne hj']
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` to take it out of a summation. -/
theorem sum_cramer {β} (s : Finset β) (f : β → n → α) :
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (f x)) = cramer A (∑ x ∈ s, f x) :=
(map_sum (cramer A) ..).symm
/-- Use linearity of `cramer` and vector evaluation to take `cramer A _ i` out of a summation. -/
theorem sum_cramer_apply {β} (s : Finset β) (f : n → β → α) (i : n) :
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (fun j => f j x) i) = cramer A (fun j : n => ∑ x ∈ s, f j x) i :=
calc
(∑ x ∈ s, cramer A (fun j => f j x) i) = (∑ x ∈ s, cramer A fun j => f j x) i :=
(Finset.sum_apply i s _).symm
_ = cramer A (fun j : n => ∑ x ∈ s, f j x) i := by
rw [sum_cramer, cramer_apply, cramer_apply]
simp only [updateCol]
congr with j
congr
apply Finset.sum_apply
theorem cramer_submatrix_equiv (A : Matrix m m α) (e : n ≃ m) (b : n → α) :
cramer (A.submatrix e e) b = cramer A (b ∘ e.symm) ∘ e := by
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, cramer_apply, updateCol_submatrix_equiv,
det_submatrix_equiv_self e, Function.comp_def]
theorem cramer_reindex (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m α) (b : n → α) :
cramer (reindex e e A) b = cramer A (b ∘ e) ∘ e.symm :=
cramer_submatrix_equiv _ _ _
end Cramer
section Adjugate
/-!
### `adjugate` section
Define the `adjugate` matrix and a few equations.
These will hold for any matrix over a commutative ring.
-/
/-- The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
Typically, the cofactor matrix is defined by taking minors,
i.e. the determinant of the matrix with a row and column removed.
However, the proof of `mul_adjugate` becomes a lot easier if we use the
matrix replacing a column with a basis vector, since it allows us to use
facts about the `cramer` map.
-/
def adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i => cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single i 1)
theorem adjugate_def (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A = of fun i => cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single i 1) :=
rfl
theorem adjugate_apply (A : Matrix n n α) (i j : n) :
adjugate A i j = (A.updateRow j (Pi.single i 1)).det := by
rw [adjugate_def, of_apply, cramer_apply, updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
theorem adjugate_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) : (adjugate A)ᵀ = adjugate Aᵀ := by
ext i j
rw [transpose_apply, adjugate_apply, adjugate_apply, updateRow_transpose, det_transpose]
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro σ _
congr 1
by_cases h : i = σ j
· -- Everything except `(i , j)` (= `(σ j , j)`) is given by A, and the rest is a single `1`.
congr
ext j'
subst h
have : σ j' = σ j ↔ j' = j := σ.injective.eq_iff
rw [updateRow_apply, updateCol_apply]
simp_rw [this]
rw [← dite_eq_ite, ← dite_eq_ite]
congr 1 with rfl
rw [Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same]
· -- Otherwise, we need to show that there is a `0` somewhere in the product.
have : (∏ j' : n, updateCol A j (Pi.single i 1) (σ j') j') = 0 := by
apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ j)
rw [updateCol_self, Pi.single_eq_of_ne' h]
rw [this]
apply prod_eq_zero (mem_univ (σ⁻¹ i))
erw [apply_symm_apply σ i, updateRow_self]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne
intro h'
exact h ((symm_apply_eq σ).mp h')
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_submatrix_equiv_self (e : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m α) :
adjugate (A.submatrix e e) = (adjugate A).submatrix e e := by
ext i j
have : (fun j ↦ Pi.single i 1 <| e.symm j) = Pi.single (e i) 1 :=
Function.update_comp_equiv (0 : n → α) e.symm i 1
rw [adjugate_apply, submatrix_apply, adjugate_apply, ← det_submatrix_equiv_self e,
updateRow_submatrix_equiv, this]
theorem adjugate_reindex (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m α) :
adjugate (reindex e e A) = reindex e e (adjugate A) :=
adjugate_submatrix_equiv_self _ _
/-- Since the map `b ↦ cramer A b` is linear in `b`, it must be multiplication by some matrix. This
matrix is `A.adjugate`. -/
theorem cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) :
cramer A b = A.adjugate *ᵥ b := by
nth_rw 2 [← A.transpose_transpose]
rw [← adjugate_transpose, adjugate_def]
have : b = ∑ i, b i • (Pi.single i 1 : n → α) := by
refine (pi_eq_sum_univ b).trans ?_
congr with j
simp [Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
conv_lhs =>
rw [this]
ext k
simp [mulVec, dotProduct, mul_comm]
theorem mul_adjugate_apply (A : Matrix n n α) (i j k) :
A i k * adjugate A k j = cramer Aᵀ (Pi.single k (A i k)) j := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, adjugate, of_apply, ← Pi.smul_apply, ← LinearMap.map_smul, ← Pi.single_smul',
smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem mul_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : A * adjugate A = A.det • (1 : Matrix n n α) := by
ext i j
rw [mul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_boole]
simp [mul_adjugate_apply, sum_cramer_apply, cramer_transpose_row_self, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
theorem adjugate_mul (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A * A = A.det • (1 : Matrix n n α) :=
calc
adjugate A * A = (Aᵀ * adjugate Aᵀ)ᵀ := by
rw [← adjugate_transpose, ← transpose_mul, transpose_transpose]
_ = _ := by rw [mul_adjugate Aᵀ, det_transpose, transpose_smul, transpose_one]
theorem adjugate_smul (r : α) (A : Matrix n n α) :
adjugate (r • A) = r ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) • adjugate A := by
rw [adjugate, adjugate, transpose_smul, cramer_smul]
rfl
/-- A stronger form of **Cramer's rule** that allows us to solve some instances of `A * x = b` even
if the determinant is not a unit. A sufficient (but still not necessary) condition is that `A.det`
divides `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) : A *ᵥ cramer A b = A.det • b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, mul_adjugate, smul_mulVec_assoc, one_mulVec]
theorem adjugate_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) : adjugate A = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [Subsingleton.elim i j, adjugate_apply, det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ i, one_apply]
theorem adjugate_eq_one_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n α} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) :
adjugate A = 1 :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
adjugate_subsingleton _
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_zero [Nontrivial n] : adjugate (0 : Matrix n n α) = 0 := by
ext i j
obtain ⟨j', hj'⟩ : ∃ j', j' ≠ j := exists_ne j
apply det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero j'
intro j''
simp [updateCol_ne hj']
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_one : adjugate (1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext
simp [adjugate_def, Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_diagonal (v : n → α) :
adjugate (diagonal v) = diagonal fun i => ∏ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, v j := by
ext i j
simp only [adjugate_def, cramer_apply, diagonal_transpose, of_apply]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq, diagonal_updateCol_single, det_diagonal,
prod_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, one_mul]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij]
refine det_eq_zero_of_row_eq_zero j fun k => ?_
obtain rfl | hjk := eq_or_ne k j
· rw [updateCol_self, Pi.single_eq_of_ne' hij]
· rw [updateCol_ne hjk, diagonal_apply_ne' _ hjk]
theorem _root_.RingHom.map_adjugate {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S)
(M : Matrix n n R) : f.mapMatrix M.adjugate = Matrix.adjugate (f.mapMatrix M) := by
ext i k
have : Pi.single i (1 : S) = f ∘ Pi.single i 1 := by
rw [← f.map_one]
exact Pi.single_op (fun _ => f) (fun _ => f.map_zero) i (1 : R)
rw [adjugate_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, map_apply, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, this, ←
map_updateRow, ← RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, ← RingHom.map_det, ← adjugate_apply]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_adjugate {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (M : Matrix n n A) :
f.mapMatrix M.adjugate = Matrix.adjugate (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_adjugate _
theorem det_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) : (adjugate A).det = A.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) := by
-- get rid of the `- 1`
rcases (Fintype.card n).eq_zero_or_pos with h_card | h_card
· haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h_card
rw [h_card, Nat.zero_sub, pow_zero, adjugate_subsingleton, det_one]
replace h_card := tsub_add_cancel_of_le h_card.nat_succ_le
-- express `A` as an evaluation of a polynomial in n^2 variables, and solve in the polynomial ring
-- where `A'.det` is non-zero.
let A' := mvPolynomialX n n ℤ
suffices A'.adjugate.det = A'.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) by
rw [← mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval ℤ A, ← AlgHom.map_adjugate, ← AlgHom.map_det, ←
AlgHom.map_det, ← map_pow, this]
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (show A'.det ≠ 0 from det_mvPolynomialX_ne_zero n ℤ)
calc
A'.det * A'.adjugate.det = (A' * adjugate A').det := (det_mul _ _).symm
_ = A'.det ^ Fintype.card n := by rw [mul_adjugate, det_smul, det_one, mul_one]
_ = A'.det * A'.det ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) := by rw [← pow_succ', h_card]
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_zero (A : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 0) α) : adjugate A = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_one (A : Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 1) α) : adjugate A = 1 :=
adjugate_subsingleton A
theorem adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) α) (i j) :
adjugate A i j = (-1) ^ (j + i : ℕ) * det (A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove) := by
simp_rw [adjugate_apply, det_succ_row _ j, updateRow_self, submatrix_updateRow_succAbove]
rw [Fintype.sum_eq_single i fun h hjk => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same, mul_one]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hjk, mul_zero, zero_mul]
theorem adjugate_fin_two (A : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) :
adjugate A = !![A 1 1, -A 0 1; -A 1 0, A 0 0] := by
ext i j
rw [adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_two_of (a b c d : α) : adjugate !![a, b; c, d] = !![d, -b; -c, a] :=
adjugate_fin_two _
theorem adjugate_fin_three (A : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) :
adjugate A =
!![A 1 1 * A 2 2 - A 1 2 * A 2 1,
-(A 0 1 * A 2 2) + A 0 2 * A 2 1,
A 0 1 * A 1 2 - A 0 2 * A 1 1;
-(A 1 0 * A 2 2) + A 1 2 * A 2 0,
A 0 0 * A 2 2 - A 0 2 * A 2 0,
-(A 0 0 * A 1 2) + A 0 2 * A 1 0;
A 1 0 * A 2 1 - A 1 1 * A 2 0,
-(A 0 0 * A 2 1) + A 0 1 * A 2 0,
A 0 0 * A 1 1 - A 0 1 * A 1 0] := by
ext i j
rw [adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix, det_fin_two]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [updateRow, Fin.succAbove, Fin.lt_def] <;> ring
@[simp]
theorem adjugate_fin_three_of (a b c d e f g h i : α) :
adjugate !![a, b, c; d, e, f; g, h, i] =
!![ e * i - f * h, -(b * i) + c * h, b * f - c * e;
-(d * i) + f * g, a * i - c * g, -(a * f) + c * d;
d * h - e * g, -(a * h) + b * g, a * e - b * d] :=
adjugate_fin_three _
theorem det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_row (A : Matrix n n α) (i : n) :
det A = ∑ j : n, A i j * adjugate A j i := by
haveI : Nonempty n := ⟨i⟩
obtain ⟨n', hn'⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Fintype.card_ne_zero : Fintype.card n ≠ 0)
obtain ⟨e⟩ := Fintype.truncEquivFinOfCardEq hn'
let A' := reindex e e A
suffices det A' = ∑ j : Fin n'.succ, A' (e i) j * adjugate A' j (e i) by
simp_rw [A', det_reindex_self, adjugate_reindex, reindex_apply, submatrix_apply, ← e.sum_comp,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at this
exact this
rw [det_succ_row A' (e i)]
| simp_rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm _ (A' _ _), ← adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
theorem det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_col (A : Matrix n n α) (j : n) :
det A = ∑ i : n, A i j * adjugate A j i := by
simpa only [det_transpose, ← adjugate_transpose] using det_eq_sum_mul_adjugate_row Aᵀ j
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Adjugate.lean | 408 | 412 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,234 | 1,235 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one]
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x := by
simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
theorem le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc]
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI)
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ I ≤ J := by
simp_rw [span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, mul_right_inj' hx,
exists_eq_right', SetLike.le_def]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} ≤ J * span {x} ↔ I ≤ J := by
simpa only [mul_comm I, mul_comm J] using span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I = span {x} * J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} = J * span {x} ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_left_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective ((span {x} : Ideal R) * ·) := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx).mp
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun I : Ideal R => I * span {x} := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_left_inj hx).mp
theorem eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
theorem span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
(∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧ ∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → Set R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span (I i)) = Ideal.span (∏ i ∈ s, I i) :=
Submodule.prod_span s I
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} :=
Submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
@[simp]
theorem multiset_prod_span_singleton (m : Multiset R) :
(m.map fun x => Ideal.span {x}).prod = Ideal.span ({Multiset.prod m} : Set R) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) fun a m ih => by
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, ih, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (IsCoprime on I)) :
(s.inf fun i => Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_finset_inf, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI, fun h i hi => (Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
theorem iInf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I : ι → R}
(hI : ∀ (i j) (_ : i ≠ j), IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) :
⨅ i, span ({I i} : Set R) = span {∏ i, I i} := by
rw [← Finset.inf_univ_eq_iInf, finset_inf_span_singleton]
rwa [Finset.coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem iInf_span_singleton_natCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{I : ι → ℕ} (hI : Pairwise fun i j => (I i).Coprime (I j)) :
⨅ (i : ι), span {(I i : R)} = span {((∏ i : ι, I i : ℕ) : R)} := by
rw [iInf_span_singleton, Nat.cast_prod]
exact fun i j h ↦ (hI h).cast
theorem sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : Set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩
rw [mem_span_singleton'] at hu hv
rw [← hu.choose_spec, ← hv.choose_spec] at h1
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩
· exact fun ⟨u, v, h1⟩ =>
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj => ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} : s.prod ≤ s.inf := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.inf_zero]
exact le_top
intro a s ih
rw [Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.inf_cons]
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
theorem prod_le_inf {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf fun r ⟨hri, hrj⟩ =>
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h)
mul_one r ▸
hst ▸
(mul_add r s t).symm ▸ Ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) fun i hi => by
rw [eq_top_iff_one] at h; rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h hi ⊢
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, ?_⟩
rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ J := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = K ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h, sup_comm]
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_right (h : K ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right h, sup_comm]
theorem sup_prod_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ∏ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
Finset.prod_induction _ (fun J => I ⊔ J = ⊤)
(fun _ _ hJ hK => (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hJ).trans hK)
(by simp_rw [one_eq_top, sup_top_eq]) h
theorem sup_multiset_prod_eq_top {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} (h : ∀ p ∈ s, I ⊔ p = ⊤) :
I ⊔ Multiset.prod s = ⊤ :=
Multiset.prod_induction (I ⊔ · = ⊤) s (fun _ _ hp hq ↦ (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hp).trans hq)
(by simp only [one_eq_top, ge_iff_le, top_le_iff, le_top, sup_of_le_right]) h
theorem sup_iInf_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ⨅ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
le_of_eq_of_le (sup_prod_eq_top h).symm <|
sup_le_sup_left (le_of_le_of_eq prod_le_inf <| Finset.inf_eq_iInf _ _) _
theorem prod_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(∏ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_prod_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem iInf_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_iInf_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem sup_pow_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact sup_prod_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ n ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact prod_sup_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_pow_eq_top {m n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ m ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ :=
sup_pow_eq_top (pow_sup_eq_top h)
variable (I) in
@[simp]
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
Ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ Submodule.top_smul I
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma multiset_prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R] {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} :
s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff
theorem span_pair_mul_span_pair (w x y z : R) :
(span {w, x} : Ideal R) * span {y, z} = span {w * y, w * z, x * y, x * z} := by
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_mul, mul_sup, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, sup_assoc]
theorem isCoprime_iff_codisjoint : IsCoprime I J ↔ Codisjoint I J := by
rw [IsCoprime, codisjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
apply (show x * I + y * J ≤ I ⊔ J from
sup_le (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_left) (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_right))
rw [hxy]
simp only [one_eq_top, Submodule.mem_top]
· intro h
refine ⟨1, 1, ?_⟩
simpa only [one_eq_top, top_mul, Submodule.add_eq_sup]
theorem isCoprime_of_isMaximal [I.IsMaximal] [J.IsMaximal] (ne : I ≠ J) : IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, isMaximal_def] at *
exact IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne ‹_› ‹_› ne
theorem isCoprime_iff_add : IsCoprime I J ↔ I + J = 1 := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, add_eq_sup, one_eq_top]
theorem isCoprime_iff_exists : IsCoprime I J ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [← add_eq_one_iff, isCoprime_iff_add]
theorem isCoprime_iff_sup_eq : IsCoprime I J ↔ I ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff]
open List in
theorem isCoprime_tfae : TFAE [IsCoprime I J, Codisjoint I J, I + J = 1,
∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1, I ⊔ J = ⊤] := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, ← isCoprime_iff_add, ← isCoprime_iff_exists,
← isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
simp
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.codisjoint (h : IsCoprime I J) : Codisjoint I J :=
isCoprime_iff_codisjoint.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.add_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I + J = 1 := isCoprime_iff_add.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.exists (h : IsCoprime I J) : ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 :=
isCoprime_iff_exists.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.sup_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊔ J = ⊤ := isCoprime_iff_sup_eq.mp h
theorem inf_eq_mul_of_isCoprime (coprime : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊓ J = I * J :=
(Ideal.mul_eq_inf_of_coprime coprime.sup_eq).symm
theorem isCoprime_span_singleton_iff (x y : R) :
IsCoprime (span <| singleton x) (span <| singleton y) ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_singleton_sup,
mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, e⟩; exact ⟨a, b, mul_comm b y ▸ e⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, e⟩; exact ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, mul_comm y b ▸ e⟩
theorem isCoprime_biInf {J : ι → Ideal R} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ j ∈ s, IsCoprime I (J j)) : IsCoprime I (⨅ j ∈ s, J j) := by
classical
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_add] at *
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp
| insert i s _ hs =>
rw [Finset.iInf_insert, inf_comm, one_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← one_eq_top]
set K := ⨅ j ∈ s, J j
calc
1 = I + K := (hs fun j hj ↦ hf j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)).symm
_ = I + K*(I + J i) := by rw [hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s), mul_one]
_ = (1+K)*I + K*J i := by ring
_ ≤ I + K ⊓ J i := add_le_add mul_le_left mul_le_inf
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r ^ n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R where
carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I }
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0 : R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩
add_mem' := fun {_ _} ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩ =>
⟨m + n - 1, add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem I hxmi hyni⟩
smul_mem' {r s} := fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r ^ n) h⟩
theorem mem_radical_iff {r : R} : r ∈ I.radical ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I := Iff.rfl
/-- An ideal is radical if it contains its radical. -/
def IsRadical (I : Ideal R) : Prop :=
I.radical ≤ I
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I := fun r hri => ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
/-- An ideal is radical iff it is equal to its radical. -/
theorem radical_eq_iff : I.radical = I ↔ I.IsRadical := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left le_radical, IsRadical]
alias ⟨_, IsRadical.radical⟩ := radical_eq_iff
theorem isRadical_iff_pow_one_lt (k : ℕ) (hk : 1 < k) : I.IsRadical ↔ ∀ r, r ^ k ∈ I → r ∈ I :=
⟨fun h _r hr ↦ h ⟨k, hr⟩, fun h x ⟨n, hx⟩ ↦
k.pow_imp_self_of_one_lt hk _ (fun _ _ ↦ .inr ∘ I.smul_mem _) h n x hx⟩
variable (R) in
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, Submodule.mem_top⟩
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variable (I)
theorem radical_isRadical : (radical I).IsRadical := fun r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩ =>
⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩
@[simp]
theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
(radical_isRadical I).radical
variable {I}
theorem IsRadical.radical_le_iff (hJ : J.IsRadical) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, fun h => hJ.radical ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
(radical_isRadical J).radical_le_iff
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h =>
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <|
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn,
fun h => h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem IsPrime.isRadical (H : IsPrime I) : I.IsRadical := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ =>
H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni
theorem IsPrime.radical (H : IsPrime I) : radical I = I :=
IsRadical.radical H.isRadical
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : Ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (y : R) (hI : I.IsRadical) :
Disjoint (Submonoid.powers y : Set R) ↑I ↔ y ∉ I.1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.disjoint_left.1 h (Submonoid.mem_powers _),
fun h => disjoint_iff.mpr (eq_bot_iff.mpr ?_)⟩
rintro x ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, hx'⟩
exact h (hI <| mem_radical_of_pow_mem <| le_radical hx')
variable (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono <| sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) <|
radical_le_radical_iff.2 <| sup_le (radical_mono le_sup_left) (radical_mono le_sup_right)
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩
variable {I J} in
theorem IsRadical.inf (hI : IsRadical I) (hJ : IsRadical J) : IsRadical (I ⊓ J) := by
rw [IsRadical, radical_inf]; exact inf_le_inf hI hJ
/-- `Ideal.radical` as an `InfTopHom`, bundling in that it distributes over `inf`. -/
def radicalInfTopHom : InfTopHom (Ideal R) (Ideal R) where
toFun := radical
map_inf' := radical_inf
map_top' := radical_top _
@[simp]
lemma radicalInfTopHom_apply (I : Ideal R) : radicalInfTopHom I = radical I := rfl
open Finset in
lemma radical_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → (f y).radical = (f i).radical) :
(s.inf f).radical = (f i).radical := by
rw [← radicalInfTopHom_apply, map_finset_inf, ← Finset.inf'_eq_inf ⟨_, hi⟩]
exact Finset.inf'_eq_of_forall _ _ hs
/-- The reverse inclusion does not hold for e.g. `I := fun n : ℕ ↦ Ideal.span {(2 ^ n : ℤ)}`. -/
theorem radical_iInf_le {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) : radical (⨅ i, I i) ≤ ⨅ i, radical (I i) :=
le_iInf fun _ ↦ radical_mono (iInf_le _ _)
theorem isRadical_iInf {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) (hI : ∀ i, IsRadical (I i)) : IsRadical (⨅ i, I i) :=
(radical_iInf_le I).trans (iInf_mono hI)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩
have := radical_mono <| @mul_le_inf _ _ I J
simp_rw [radical_inf I J] at this
assumption
variable {I J}
theorem IsPrime.radical_le_iff (hJ : IsPrime J) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
IsRadical.radical_le_iff hJ.isRadical
theorem radical_eq_sInf (I : Ideal R) : radical I = sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun _ hJ ↦ hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) fun r hr ↦
by_contradiction fun hri ↦
let ⟨m, hIm, hm⟩ :=
zorn_le_nonempty₀ { K : Ideal R | r ∉ radical K }
(fun c hc hcc y hyc =>
⟨sSup c, fun ⟨n, hrnc⟩ =>
let ⟨_, hyc, hrny⟩ := (Submodule.mem_sSup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directedOn).1 hrnc
hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
I hri
have hrm : r ∉ radical m := hm.prop
have : ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := fun x hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hrmx => hxm <| by
rw [hm.eq_of_le hrmx le_sup_left]
exact Submodule.mem_sup_right <| mem_span_singleton_self x
have : IsPrime m :=
⟨by rintro rfl; rw [radical_top] at hrm; exact hrm trivial, fun {x y} hxym =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hym =>
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm
let ⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn
let ⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym
let ⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk
let ⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg
hrm
⟨n + k, by
rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c * x),
mul_assoc c x (d * y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc]
refine
m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm)
(m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm) (m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩
hrm <|
this.radical.symm ▸ (sInf_le ⟨hIm, this⟩ : sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } ≤ m) hr
theorem isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
(⊥ : Ideal R).IsRadical := fun _ hx => hx.recOn fun _ hn => pow_eq_zero hn
@[simp]
theorem radical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
radical (⊥ : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors
instance : IdemCommSemiring (Ideal R) :=
inferInstance
variable (R) in
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
Nat.recOn n one_eq_top fun n ih => by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
theorem natCast_eq_top {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
natCast_eq_one hn |>.trans one_eq_top
/-- `3 : Ideal R` is *not* the ideal generated by 3 (which would be spelt
`Ideal.span {3}`), it is simply `1 + 1 + 1 = ⊤`. -/
theorem ofNat_eq_top {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
ofNat_eq_one.trans one_eq_top
variable (I)
lemma radical_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → radical (I ^ n) = radical I
| 1, _ => by simp
| n + 2, _ => by rw [pow_succ, radical_mul, radical_pow n.succ_ne_zero, inf_idem]
theorem IsPrime.mul_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P := by
rw [or_comm, Ideal.mul_le]
simp_rw [hp.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem, SetLike.le_def, ← forall_or_left, or_comm, forall_or_left]
theorem IsPrime.inf_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨fun h ↦ hp.mul_le.1 <| mul_le_inf.trans h, fun h ↦ h.elim inf_le_left.trans inf_le_right.trans⟩
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_le {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P :=
s.induction_on (by simp [hp.ne_top]) fun I s ih ↦ by simp [hp.mul_le, ih]
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_map_le {s : Multiset ι} (f : ι → Ideal R) {P : Ideal R}
(hp : IsPrime P) : (s.map f).prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P := by
simp_rw [hp.multiset_prod_le, Multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_mem_iff_exists_mem {I : Ideal R} (hI : I.IsPrime) (s : Multiset R) :
s.prod ∈ I ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, p ∈ I := by
simpa [span_singleton_le_iff_mem] using (hI.multiset_prod_map_le (span {·}))
theorem IsPrime.pow_le_iff {I P : Ideal R} [hP : P.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
I ^ n ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P := by
have h : (Multiset.replicate n I).prod ≤ P ↔ _ := hP.multiset_prod_le
simp_rw [Multiset.prod_replicate, Multiset.mem_replicate, ne_eq, hn, not_false_eq_true,
true_and, exists_eq_left] at h
exact h
theorem IsPrime.le_of_pow_le {I P : Ideal R} [hP : P.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (h : I ^ n ≤ P) :
I ≤ P := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, pow_zero, one_eq_top] at h
exact fun ⦃_⦄ _ ↦ h Submodule.mem_top
· exact (pow_le_iff hn).mp h
theorem IsPrime.prod_le {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.prod f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
hp.multiset_prod_map_le f
/-- The product of a finite number of elements in the commutative semiring `R` lies in the
prime ideal `p` if and only if at least one of those elements is in `p`. -/
theorem IsPrime.prod_mem_iff {s : Finset ι} {x : ι → R} {p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsPrime] :
∏ i ∈ s, x i ∈ p ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, x i ∈ p := by
simp_rw [← span_singleton_le_iff_mem, ← prod_span_singleton]
exact hp.prod_le
theorem IsPrime.prod_mem_iff_exists_mem {I : Ideal R} (hI : I.IsPrime) (s : Finset R) :
s.prod (fun x ↦ x) ∈ I ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, p ∈ I := by
rw [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_id']
exact hI.multiset_prod_mem_iff_exists_mem s.val
theorem IsPrime.inf_le' {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.inf f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
⟨fun h ↦ hp.prod_le.1 <| prod_le_inf.trans h, fun ⟨_, his, hip⟩ ↦ (Finset.inf_le his).trans hip⟩
-- Porting note: needed to add explicit coercions (· : Set R).
theorem subset_union {R : Type u} [Ring R] {I J K : Ideal R} :
(I : Set R) ⊆ J ∪ K ↔ I ≤ J ∨ I ≤ K :=
AddSubgroupClass.subset_union
theorem subset_union_prime' {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {a b : ι}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, IsPrime (f i)) {I : Ideal R} :
((I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) ↔ I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i := by
suffices
((I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) → I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i from
⟨this, fun h =>
Or.casesOn h
(fun h =>
Set.Subset.trans h <|
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left)
fun h =>
Or.casesOn h
(fun h =>
Set.Subset.trans h <|
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_left)
fun ⟨i, his, hi⟩ => by
refine Set.Subset.trans hi <| Set.Subset.trans ?_ Set.subset_union_right
exact Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem (u := fun x ↦ (f x : Set R)) (Finset.mem_coe.2 his)⟩
generalize hn : s.card = n; intro h
induction' n with n ih generalizing a b s
· clear hp
rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at hn
subst hn
rw [Finset.coe_empty, Set.biUnion_empty, Set.union_empty, subset_union] at h
simpa only [exists_prop, Finset.not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false, or_false]
classical
replace hn : ∃ (i : ι) (t : Finset ι), i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s ∧ t.card = n :=
Finset.card_eq_succ.1 hn
rcases hn with ⟨i, t, hit, rfl, hn⟩
replace hp : IsPrime (f i) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, IsPrime (f x) := (t.forall_mem_insert _ _).1 hp
by_cases Ht : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i
· obtain ⟨j, hjt, hfji⟩ : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i := Ht
obtain ⟨u, hju, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, j ∉ u ∧ insert j u = t :=
⟨t.erase j, t.not_mem_erase j, Finset.insert_erase hjt⟩
have hp' : ∀ k ∈ insert i u, IsPrime (f k) := by
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hp ⊢
exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.2⟩
have hiu : i ∉ u := mt Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hit
have hn' : (insert i u).card = n := by
rwa [Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem] at hn ⊢
exacts [hiu, hju]
have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ k ∈ (↑(insert i u) : Set ι), f k := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert] at h ⊢
rw [Finset.coe_insert] at h
simp only [Set.biUnion_insert] at h ⊢
rw [← Set.union_assoc (f i : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right hfji] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp' hn' h'
refine ih.imp id (Or.imp id (Exists.imp fun k => ?_))
exact And.imp (fun hk => Finset.insert_subset_insert i (Finset.subset_insert j u) hk) id
by_cases Ha : f a ≤ f i
· have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f i ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_assoc,
Set.union_right_comm (f a : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Ha] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp.2 hn h'
right
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩
· exact Or.inl ih
· exact Or.inr ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩
by_cases Hb : f b ≤ f i
· have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f i ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_assoc,
Set.union_assoc (f a : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Hb] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp.2 hn h'
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inl ih
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩)
by_cases Hi : I ≤ f i
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, Hi⟩)
have : ¬I ⊓ f a ⊓ f b ⊓ t.inf f ≤ f i := by
simp only [hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le', not_or]
exact ⟨⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩, Ht⟩
rcases Set.not_subset.1 this with ⟨r, ⟨⟨⟨hrI, hra⟩, hrb⟩, hr⟩, hri⟩
by_cases HI : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j
· specialize ih hp.2 hn HI
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· left
exact ih
· right
left
exact ih
· right
right
exact ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩
exfalso
rcases Set.not_subset.1 HI with ⟨s, hsI, hs⟩
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert] at h
have hsi : s ∈ f i := ((h hsI).resolve_left (mt Or.inl hs)).resolve_right (mt Or.inr hs)
rcases h (I.add_mem hrI hsI) with (⟨ha | hb⟩ | hi | ht)
· exact hs (Or.inl <| Or.inl <| add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f a).sub_mem ha hra)
· exact hs (Or.inl <| Or.inr <| add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f b).sub_mem hb hrb)
· exact hri (add_sub_cancel_right r s ▸ (f i).sub_mem hi hsi)
· rw [Set.mem_iUnion₂] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨j, hjt, hj⟩
simp only [Finset.inf_eq_iInf, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_iInf] at hr
exact hs <| Or.inr <| Set.mem_biUnion hjt <|
add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f j).sub_mem hj <| hr j hjt
/-- Prime avoidance. Atiyah-Macdonald 1.11, Eisenbud 3.3, Matsumura Ex.1.6. -/
@[stacks 00DS]
theorem subset_union_prime {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} (a b : ι)
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ a → i ≠ b → IsPrime (f i)) {I : Ideal R} :
((I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices ((I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) → ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ I ≤ f i by
have aux := fun h => (bex_def.2 <| this h)
simp_rw [exists_prop] at aux
refine ⟨aux, fun ⟨i, his, hi⟩ ↦ Set.Subset.trans hi ?_⟩
apply Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem (show i ∈ (↑s : Set ι) from his)
fun h : (I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i => by
classical
by_cases has : a ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, hat, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s :=
⟨s.erase a, Finset.not_mem_erase a s, Finset.insert_erase has⟩
by_cases hbt : b ∈ t
· obtain ⟨u, hbu, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, b ∉ u ∧ insert b u = t :=
⟨t.erase b, Finset.not_mem_erase b t, Finset.insert_erase hbt⟩
have hp' : ∀ i ∈ u, IsPrime (f i) := by
intro i hiu
refine hp i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiu)) ?_ ?_ <;>
rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ←
Set.union_assoc, subset_union_prime' hp'] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert, Finset.exists_mem_insert]
· have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f a : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
· by_cases hbs : b ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ insert b t = s :=
⟨s.erase b, Finset.not_mem_erase b s, Finset.insert_erase hbs⟩
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f b : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hse | hsne
· subst hse
rw [Finset.coe_empty, Set.biUnion_empty, Set.subset_empty_iff] at h
have : (I : Set R) ≠ ∅ := Set.Nonempty.ne_empty (Set.nonempty_of_mem I.zero_mem)
exact absurd h this
· obtain ⟨i, his⟩ := hsne
obtain ⟨t, _, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s :=
⟨s.erase i, Finset.not_mem_erase i s, Finset.insert_erase his⟩
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f i : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
section Dvd
/-- If `I` divides `J`, then `I` contains `J`.
In a Dedekind domain, to divide and contain are equivalent, see `Ideal.dvd_iff_le`.
-/
theorem le_of_dvd {I J : Ideal R} : I ∣ J → J ≤ I
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h.symm ▸ le_trans mul_le_inf inf_le_left
/-- See also `isUnit_iff_eq_one`. -/
@[simp high]
theorem isUnit_iff {I : Ideal R} : IsUnit I ↔ I = ⊤ :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.trans
((@one_eq_top R _).symm ▸
⟨fun h => eq_top_iff.mpr (Ideal.le_of_dvd h), fun h => ⟨⊤, by rw [mul_top, h]⟩⟩)
instance uniqueUnits : Unique (Ideal R)ˣ where
default := 1
uniq u := Units.ext (show (u : Ideal R) = 1 by rw [isUnit_iff.mp u.isUnit, one_eq_top])
end Dvd
end MulAndRadical
section Total
variable (ι : Type*)
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (v : ι → M) (hv : Submodule.span R (Set.range v) = ⊤)
/-- A variant of `Finsupp.linearCombination` that takes in vectors valued in `I`. -/
noncomputable def finsuppTotal : (ι →₀ I) →ₗ[R] M :=
(Finsupp.linearCombination R v).comp (Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap I.subtype)
variable {ι M v}
theorem finsuppTotal_apply (f : ι →₀ I) :
finsuppTotal ι M I v f = f.sum fun i x => (x : R) • v i := by
dsimp [finsuppTotal]
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, Finsupp.sum_mapRange_index]
exact fun _ => zero_smul _ _
theorem finsuppTotal_apply_eq_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (f : ι →₀ I) :
finsuppTotal ι M I v f = ∑ i, (f i : R) • v i := by
rw [finsuppTotal_apply, Finsupp.sum_fintype]
exact fun _ => zero_smul _ _
theorem range_finsuppTotal :
LinearMap.range (finsuppTotal ι M I v) = I • Submodule.span R (Set.range v) := by
ext
rw [Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum]
refine ⟨fun ⟨f, h⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap I.subtype f, fun i => (f i).2, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
classical
refine ⟨a.mapRange (fun r => if h : r ∈ I then ⟨r, h⟩ else 0)
(by simp only [Submodule.zero_mem, ↓reduceDIte]; rfl), ?_⟩
rw [finsuppTotal_apply, Finsupp.sum_mapRange_index]
· apply Finsupp.sum_congr
intro i _
rw [dif_pos (ha i)]
· exact fun _ => zero_smul _ _
end Total
end Ideal
section span_range
variable {α R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem Finsupp.mem_ideal_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp {x : R} {v : α → R} :
x ∈ Ideal.span (Set.range v) ↔ ∃ c : α →₀ R, (c.sum fun i a => a * v i) = x :=
Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp
/-- An element `x` lies in the span of `v` iff it can be written as sum `∑ cᵢ • vᵢ = x`.
-/
theorem Ideal.mem_span_range_iff_exists_fun [Fintype α] {x : R} {v : α → R} :
x ∈ Ideal.span (Set.range v) ↔ ∃ c : α → R, ∑ i, c i * v i = x :=
Submodule.mem_span_range_iff_exists_fun _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-02")] alias mem_ideal_span_range_iff_exists_fun :=
Ideal.mem_span_range_iff_exists_fun
end span_range
theorem Associates.mk_ne_zero' {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {r : R} :
Associates.mk (Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 ↔ r ≠ 0 := by
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ne, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors in
theorem Ideal.span_singleton_nonZeroDivisors {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R]
{r : R} : span {r} ∈ (Ideal R)⁰ ↔ r ∈ R⁰ := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· exact ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.eq_zero _, fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.eq_zero _⟩
· rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero, mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, zero_eq_bot,
span_singleton_eq_bot]
theorem Ideal.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R]
(P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] : P.primeCompl ≤ nonZeroDivisors R :=
le_nonZeroDivisors_of_noZeroDivisors <| not_not_intro P.zero_mem
namespace Submodule
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
instance moduleSubmodule : Module (Ideal R) (Submodule R M) where
smul_add := smul_sup
add_smul := sup_smul
mul_smul := Submodule.mul_smul
one_smul := by simp
zero_smul := bot_smul
smul_zero := smul_bot
lemma span_smul_eq
(s : Set R) (N : Submodule R M) :
Ideal.span s • N = s • N := by
rw [← coe_set_smul, coe_span_smul]
@[simp]
theorem set_smul_top_eq_span (s : Set R) :
s • ⊤ = Ideal.span s :=
(span_smul_eq s ⊤).symm.trans (Ideal.span s).mul_top
variable {A B} [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
open Submodule
instance algebraIdeal : Algebra (Ideal R) (Submodule R A) where
__ := moduleSubmodule
algebraMap :=
{ toFun := map (Algebra.linearMap R A)
map_one' := by
rw [one_eq_span, map_span, Set.image_singleton, Algebra.linearMap_apply, map_one, one_eq_span]
map_mul' := (Submodule.map_mul · · <| Algebra.ofId R A)
map_zero' := map_bot _
map_add' := (map_sup · · _) }
commutes' I M := mul_comm_of_commute <| by rintro _ ⟨r, _, rfl⟩ a _; apply Algebra.commutes
smul_def' I M := le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun r hr a ha ↦ by
rw [Algebra.smul_def]; exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ ha) (Submodule.mul_le.mpr <| by
rintro _ ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ a ha; rw [Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr ha)
/-- `Submonoid.map` as an `AlgHom`, when applied to an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps!] def mapAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : Submodule R A →ₐ[Ideal R] Submodule R B where
__ := mapHom f
commutes' I := (map_comp _ _ I).symm.trans (congr_arg (map · I) <| LinearMap.ext f.commutes)
/-- `Submonoid.map` as an `AlgEquiv`, when applied to an `AlgEquiv`. -/
-- TODO: when A, B noncommutative, still has `MulEquiv`.
@[simps!] def mapAlgEquiv (f : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : Submodule R A ≃ₐ[Ideal R] Submodule R B where
__ := mapAlgHom f
invFun := mapAlgHom f.symm
left_inv I := (map_comp _ _ I).symm.trans <|
(congr_arg (map · I) <| LinearMap.ext (f.left_inv ·)).trans (map_id I)
right_inv I := (map_comp _ _ I).symm.trans <|
(congr_arg (map · I) <| LinearMap.ext (f.right_inv ·)).trans (map_id I)
end Submodule
instance {R} [Semiring R] : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (Ideal R) R where
mul_mem _ hb := Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hb
instance {R} [Ring R] : NonUnitalSubringClass (Ideal R) R where
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 1,355 | 1,358 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 1,414 | 1,415 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms. -/
@[stacks 0017]
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := rfl
theorem symm_bijective {X Y : C} : Function.Bijective (symm : (X ≅ Y) → _) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm_eq, symm_symm_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.hom = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_comp_inv, id_comp]
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : α.inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.hom :=
hom_comp_eq_id α.symm
theorem comp_inv_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ α.inv = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.hom :=
comp_hom_eq_id α.symm
theorem hom_eq_inv (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ X) : α.hom = β.inv ↔ β.hom = α.inv := by
rw [← symm_inv, inv_eq_inv α.symm β, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The bijection `(Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
| def homToEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y) where
toFun f := f ≫ α.hom
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 211 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Alex Meiburg
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Monomial
/-!
# Erase the leading term of a univariate polynomial
## Definition
* `eraseLead f`: the polynomial `f - leading term of f`
`eraseLead` serves as reduction step in an induction, shaving off one monomial from a polynomial.
The definition is set up so that it does not mention subtraction in the definition,
and thus works for polynomials over semirings as well as rings.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- `eraseLead f` for a polynomial `f` is the polynomial obtained by
subtracting from `f` the leading term of `f`. -/
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f.eraseLead :=
(eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff f)).symm
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_C_mul_X_pow {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f.eraseLead := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
theorem eraseLead_ne_zero (f0 : 2 ≤ #f.support) : eraseLead f ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, eraseLead_support]
exact
(zero_lt_one.trans_le <| (tsub_le_tsub_right f0 1).trans Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase).ne.symm
theorem lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a < f.natDegree := by
rw [eraseLead_support, mem_erase] at h
exact (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp a h.2).lt_of_ne h.1
theorem ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a ≠ f.natDegree :=
(lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h).ne
theorem natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support : f.natDegree ∉ (eraseLead f).support := fun h =>
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h rfl
theorem eraseLead_support_card_lt (h : f ≠ 0) : #(eraseLead f).support < #f.support := by
rw [eraseLead_support]
exact card_lt_card (erase_ssubset <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h)
theorem card_support_eraseLead_add_one (h : f ≠ 0) : #f.eraseLead.support + 1 = #f.support := by
set c := #f.support with hc
cases h₁ : c
case zero =>
by_contra
exact h (card_support_eq_zero.mp h₁)
case succ =>
rw [eraseLead_support, card_erase_of_mem (natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h), ← hc, h₁]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eraseLead : #f.eraseLead.support = #f.support - 1 := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, eraseLead_zero, support_zero, card_empty]
· rw [← card_support_eraseLead_add_one hf, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eraseLead' {c : ℕ} (fc : #f.support = c + 1) :
#f.eraseLead.support = c := by
rw [card_support_eraseLead, fc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h₀ : f ≠ 0) (h₁ : f.eraseLead = 0) :
#f.support = 1 :=
(card_support_eq_zero.mpr h₁ ▸ card_support_eraseLead_add_one h₀).symm
theorem card_support_le_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : #f.support ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hpz : f = 0
case pos => simp [hpz]
case neg => exact le_of_eq (card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero hpz h)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) : eraseLead (monomial i r) = 0 := by
classical
by_cases hr : r = 0
· subst r
simp only [monomial_zero_right, eraseLead_zero]
· rw [eraseLead, natDegree_monomial, if_neg hr, erase_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C (r : R) : eraseLead (C r) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X : eraseLead (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X_pow (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (X ^ n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
@[simp]
| theorem eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (C r * X ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
@[simp] lemma eraseLead_C_mul_X (r : R) : eraseLead (C r * X) = 0 := by
simpa using eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow _ 1
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 147 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.StarAlgHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
/-!
# Non-unital Star Subalgebras
In this file we define `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them
(`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
namespace StarMemClass
/-- If a type carries an involutive star, then any star-closed subset does too. -/
instance instInvolutiveStar {S R : Type*} [InvolutiveStar R] [SetLike S R] [StarMemClass S R]
(s : S) : InvolutiveStar s where
star_involutive r := Subtype.ext <| star_star (r : R)
/-- In a star magma (i.e., a multiplication with an antimultiplicative involutive star
operation), any star-closed subset which is also closed under multiplication is itself a star
magma. -/
instance instStarMul {S R : Type*} [Mul R] [StarMul R] [SetLike S R]
[MulMemClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarMul s where
star_mul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_mul _ _
/-- In a `StarAddMonoid` (i.e., an additive monoid with an additive involutive star operation), any
star-closed subset which is also closed under addition and contains zero is itself a
`StarAddMonoid`. -/
instance instStarAddMonoid {S R : Type*} [AddMonoid R] [StarAddMonoid R] [SetLike S R]
[AddSubmonoidClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarAddMonoid s where
star_add _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_add _ _
/-- In a star ring (i.e., a non-unital, non-associative, semiring with an additive,
antimultiplicative, involutive star operation), a star-closed non-unital subsemiring is itself a
star ring. -/
instance instStarRing {S R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [StarRing R] [SetLike S R]
[NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarRing s :=
{ StarMemClass.instStarMul s, StarMemClass.instStarAddMonoid s with }
/-- In a star `R`-module (i.e., `star (r • m) = (star r) • m`) any star-closed subset which is also
closed under the scalar action by `R` is itself a star `R`-module. -/
instance instStarModule {S : Type*} (R : Type*) {M : Type*} [Star R] [Star M] [SMul R M]
[StarModule R M] [SetLike S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] [StarMemClass S M] (s : S) :
StarModule R s where
star_smul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_smul _ _
end StarMemClass
universe u u' v v' w w' w''
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u}
variable {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
variable [Star A] [Module R A]
variable {S : Type w''} [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A]
variable [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
/-- Embedding of a non-unital star subalgebra into the non-unital star algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype s with
toFun := Subtype.val
map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital star subalgebra is a non-unital subalgebra which is closed under the `star`
operation. -/
structure NonUnitalStarSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
/-- The `carrier` of a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` is closed under the `star` operation. -/
star_mem' : ∀ {a : A} (_ha : a ∈ carrier), star a ∈ carrier
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
instance instSetLike : SetLike (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
coe {s} := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass`, `SMulMemClass` and `StarMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
star_mem' := star_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
(∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) ∧ ∀ {x}, x ∈ s → star x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2.1
star_mem' := h.2.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem {s} := s.smul_mem'
instance instStarMemClass : StarMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
star_mem {s} := s.star_mem'
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := fun _S {x} hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubalgebra : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_inj {S U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = U.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S₁.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
Iff.rfl
|
/-- Copy of a non-unital star subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 190 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
|
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 320 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Pullbacks
/-!
# Relating monomorphisms and epimorphisms to limits and colimits
If `F` preserves (resp. reflects) pullbacks, then it preserves (resp. reflects) monomorphisms.
We also provide the dual version for epimorphisms.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D]
variable (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- If `F` preserves pullbacks, then it preserves monomorphisms. -/
theorem preserves_mono_of_preservesLimit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [PreservesLimit (cospan f f) F]
[Mono f] : Mono (F.map f) := by
have := isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit F _ (PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId f)
simp_rw [F.map_id] at this
apply PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId _ this
instance (priority := 100) preservesMonomorphisms_of_preservesLimitsOfShape
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F] : F.PreservesMonomorphisms where
preserves f _ := preserves_mono_of_preservesLimit F f
/-- If `F` reflects pullbacks, then it reflects monomorphisms. -/
theorem reflects_mono_of_reflectsLimit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [ReflectsLimit (cospan f f) F]
[Mono (F.map f)] : Mono f := by
have := PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId (F.map f)
simp_rw [← F.map_id] at this
apply PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId _ (isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap F _ this)
instance (priority := 100) reflectsMonomorphisms_of_reflectsLimitsOfShape
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F] : F.ReflectsMonomorphisms where
reflects f _ := reflects_mono_of_reflectsLimit F f
/-- If `F` preserves pushouts, then it preserves epimorphisms. -/
theorem preserves_epi_of_preservesColimit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [PreservesColimit (span f f) F]
[Epi f] : Epi (F.map f) := by
have := isColimitPushoutCoconeMapOfIsColimit F _ (PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId f)
simp_rw [F.map_id] at this
apply PushoutCocone.epi_of_isColimitMkIdId _ this
instance (priority := 100) preservesEpimorphisms_of_preservesColimitsOfShape
[PreservesColimitsOfShape WalkingSpan F] : F.PreservesEpimorphisms where
preserves f _ := preserves_epi_of_preservesColimit F f
/-- If `F` reflects pushouts, then it reflects epimorphisms. -/
theorem reflects_epi_of_reflectsColimit {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [ReflectsColimit (span f f) F]
[Epi (F.map f)] : Epi f := by
have := PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId (F.map f)
simp_rw [← F.map_id] at this
apply
PushoutCocone.epi_of_isColimitMkIdId _
(isColimitOfIsColimitPushoutCoconeMap F _ this)
| instance (priority := 100) reflectsEpimorphisms_of_reflectsColimitsOfShape
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape WalkingSpan F] : F.ReflectsEpimorphisms where
reflects f _ := reflects_epi_of_reflectsColimit F f
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Constructions/EpiMono.lean | 71 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,588 | 1,589 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Closure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.Adjoin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.TranscendenceBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.SeparableDegree
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Separable degree
This file contains basics about the separable degree of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `Field.Emb F E`: the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`
(the algebraic closure of `F` is usually used in the literature, but our definition has the
advantage that `Field.Emb F E` lies in the same universe as `E` rather than the maximum over `F`
and `E`). Usually denoted by $\operatorname{Emb}_F(E)$ in textbooks.
- `Field.finSepDegree F E`: the (finite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an extension `E / F`
of fields, defined to be the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic
closure of `E`, as a natural number. It is zero if `Field.Emb F E` is not finite.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense.
**Remark:** the `Cardinal`-valued, potentially infinite separable degree `Field.sepDegree F E`
for a general algebraic extension `E / F` is defined to be the degree of `L / F`, where `L` is
the separable closure of `F` in `E`, which is not defined in this file yet. Later we
will show that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite, then these two
definitions coincide. If `E / F` is algebraic with infinite separable degree, we have
`#(Field.Emb F E) = 2 ^ Field.sepDegree F E` instead.
(See `Field.Emb.cardinal_eq_two_pow_sepDegree` in another file.) For example, if
$F = \mathbb{Q}$ and $E = \mathbb{Q}( \mu_{p^\infty} )$, then $\operatorname{Emb}_F (E)$
is in bijection with $\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$, which is isomorphic to
$\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, which is uncountable, whereas $ [E:F] $ is countable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
## Main results
- `Field.embEquivOfEquiv`, `Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv`:
a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. In particular, they have the same cardinality (so their
`Field.finSepDegree` are equal).
- `Field.embEquivOfAdjoinSplits`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F`
and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embEquivOfIsAlgClosed`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed.
In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic`, `Field.finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic`:
if `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection `Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`.
In particular, the separable degrees satisfy the tower law: $[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$
(see also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`).
- `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`: `Field.Emb` is infinite for transcendental extensions.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_le_natDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than
its degree.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff`: the separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is
equal to its degree if and only if it is separable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_splits`: if a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree
is equal to the number of distinct roots of it over `E`.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: the separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_expand`: if a field `F` is of exponential characteristic
`q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f` and `f` have the same separable degree.
- `Polynomial.HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq`: if a polynomial has separable
contraction, then its separable degree is equal to its separable contraction degree.
- `Irreducible.natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree`: the separable degree of an irreducible
polynomial divides its degree.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree`: the separable degree of
`F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff`: if `α` is algebraic over `F`, then
the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a
separable element.
- `Field.finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`: the separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides
the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_le_finrank`: the separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller
than the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff`: if `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree
is equal to its degree if and only if it is a separable extension.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_isSeparable`: `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension
if and only if `x` is a separable element.
- `Algebra.IsSeparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both separable, then `K / F` is also
separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, polynomial
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
namespace Field
/-- `Field.Emb F E` is the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure
of `E`. -/
abbrev Emb := E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure E
/-- If `E / F` is an algebraic extension, then the (finite) separable degree of `E / F`
is the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`,
as a natural number. It is defined to be zero if there are infinitely many of them.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense. -/
def finSepDegree : ℕ := Nat.card (Emb F E)
instance instInhabitedEmb : Inhabited (Emb F E) := ⟨IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E _⟩
instance instNeZeroFinSepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] : NeZero (finSepDegree F E) :=
⟨Nat.card_ne_zero.2 ⟨inferInstance, Fintype.finite <| minpoly.AlgHom.fintype _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. -/
def embEquivOfEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Emb F E ≃ Emb F K := AlgEquiv.arrowCongr i <| AlgEquiv.symm <| by
let _ : Algebra E K := i.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K := by
constructor
intro x
have h := isAlgebraic_algebraMap (R := E) (A := K) (i.symm.toAlgHom x)
rw [show ∀ y : E, (algebraMap E K) y = i.toAlgHom y from fun y ↦ rfl] at h
simpa only [AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using h
apply AlgEquiv.restrictScalars (R := F) (S := E)
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K) (AlgebraicClosure E)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same `Field.finSepDegree`
over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finSepDegree F E = finSepDegree F K := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfEquiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_self : finSepDegree F F = 1 := by
have : Cardinal.mk (Emb F F) = 1 := le_antisymm
(Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton.2 AlgHom.subsingleton)
(Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _)
rw [finSepDegree, Nat.card, this, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
namespace IntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = 1 := by
rw [finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ (botEquiv F E), finSepDegree_self]
section Tower
variable {F}
variable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot' : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F E :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((botEquiv E K).restrictScalars F)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_top : finSepDegree F (⊤ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F K :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((topEquiv (F := E) (E := K)).restrictScalars F)
end Tower
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every
element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`.
Combined with `Field.instInhabitedEmb`, it can be viewed as a stronger version of
`IntermediateField.nonempty_algHom_of_adjoin_splits`. -/
def embEquivOfAdjoinSplits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
(hS ▸ isAlgebraic_adjoin (S := S) fun x hx ↦ (hK x hx).1)
have halg := (topEquiv (F := F) (E := E)).isAlgebraic
Classical.choice <| Function.Embedding.antisymm
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ splits_of_mem_adjoin F E (S := S) hK (hS ▸ mem_top)) _)
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) _)
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K`
if `E = F(S)` such that every element
`s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K hS hK)
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic
and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
def embEquivOfIsAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K (adjoin_univ F E) fun s _ ↦
⟨Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral s, IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _⟩
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K` as a natural number,
when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
@[stacks 09HJ "We use `finSepDegree` to state a more general result."]
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfIsAlgClosed F E K)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection
`Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`. A corollary of `algHomEquivSigma`. -/
def embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
Emb F E × Emb E K ≃ Emb F K :=
let e : ∀ f : E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure K,
@AlgHom E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra ≃ Emb E K := fun f ↦
(@embEquivOfIsAlgClosed E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra).symm
(algHomEquivSigma (A := F) (B := E) (C := K) (D := AlgebraicClosure K) |>.trans
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv e) |>.trans <| Equiv.prodCongrLeft <|
fun _ : Emb E K ↦ AlgEquiv.arrowCongr (@AlgEquiv.refl F E _ _ _) <|
(IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K)
(AlgebraicClosure E)).restrictScalars F).symm
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.Emb F E` is infinite. -/
instance infinite_emb_of_transcendental [H : Algebra.Transcendental F E] : Infinite (Emb F E) := by
obtain ⟨ι, x, hx⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis' F E
have := hx.isAlgebraic_field
rw [← (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F (adjoin F (Set.range x)) E).infinite_iff]
refine @Prod.infinite_of_left _ _ ?_ _
rw [← (embEquivOfEquiv _ _ _ hx.1.aevalEquivField).infinite_iff]
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hx.nonempty_iff_transcendental.2 H
let K := FractionRing (MvPolynomial ι F)
let i1 := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F (MvPolynomial ι F) (AlgebraicClosure K)
have hi1 : Function.Injective i1 := by
rw [IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq _ K]
exact (algebraMap K (AlgebraicClosure K)).injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
let f (n : ℕ) : Emb F K := IsFractionRing.liftAlgHom
(g := i1.comp <| MvPolynomial.aeval fun i : ι ↦ MvPolynomial.X i ^ (n + 1)) <| hi1.comp <| by
simpa [algebraicIndependent_iff_injective_aeval] using
MvPolynomial.algebraicIndependent_polynomial_aeval_X _
fun i : ι ↦ (Polynomial.transcendental_X F).pow n.succ_pos
refine Infinite.of_injective f fun m n h ↦ ?_
replace h : (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (m + 1) = (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (n + 1) := hi1 <| by
simpa [f, -map_pow] using congr($h (algebraMap _ K (MvPolynomial.X (R := F) i)))
simpa using congr(MvPolynomial.totalDegree $h)
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.finSepDegree F E = 0`, which
actually means that `Field.Emb F E` is infinite (see `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`). -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_zero_of_transcendental [Algebra.Transcendental F E] :
finSepDegree F E = 0 := Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic, then their
separable degrees satisfy the tower law
$[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$. See also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`. -/
@[stacks 09HK "Part 1, `finSepDegree` variant"]
theorem finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic
[Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
finSepDegree F E * finSepDegree E K = finSepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Nat.card_prod] using Nat.card_congr (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F E K)
end Field
namespace Polynomial
variable {F E}
variable (f : F[X])
open Classical in
/-- The separable degree `Polynomial.natSepDegree` of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
This is similar to `Polynomial.natDegree` but not to `Polynomial.degree`, namely, the separable
degree of `0` is `0`, not negative infinity. -/
def natSepDegree : ℕ := (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset.card
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_le_natDegree : f.natSepDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
have := f.map (algebraMap F f.SplittingField) |>.card_roots'
rw [← aroots_def, natDegree_map] at this
classical
exact (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset_card_le.trans this
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C (x : F) : (X - C x).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X_sub_C, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X : (X : F[X]).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
/-- A constant polynomial has zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero (h : f.natDegree = 0) : f.natSepDegree = 0 := by
linarith only [natSepDegree_le_natDegree f, h]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C (x : F) : (C x).natSepDegree = 0 := natSepDegree_eq_zero _ (natDegree_C _)
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_zero : (0 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, natSepDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_one : (1 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, natSepDegree_C]
/-- A non-constant polynomial has non-zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero (h : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 := by
rw [natSepDegree, ne_eq, Finset.card_eq_zero, ← ne_eq, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
use rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
classical
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
exact ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ h, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)⟩
/-- A polynomial has zero separable degree if and only if it is constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree = 0 ↔ f.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨(natSepDegree_ne_zero f).mtr, natSepDegree_eq_zero f⟩
/-- A polynomial has non-zero separable degree if and only if it is non-constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 ↔ f.natDegree ≠ 0 :=
Iff.not <| natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff f
/-- The separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is equal to its degree if and only if
it is separable. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree ↔ f.Separable := by
classical
simp_rw [← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree_iff_of_splits hf (SplittingField.splits f),
rootSet_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe]
rfl
/-- If a polynomial is separable, then its separable degree is equal to its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := (natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff f h.ne_zero).2 h
variable {f} in
/-- Same as `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable`, but enables the use of
dot notation. -/
theorem Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable f h
/-- If a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over `E`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_splits [DecidableEq E] (h : f.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card := by
classical
rw [aroots, ← (SplittingField.lift f h).comp_algebraMap, ← map_map,
roots_map _ ((splits_id_iff_splits _).mpr <| SplittingField.splits f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (RingHom.injective _), natSepDegree]
variable (E) in
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [DecidableEq E] [IsAlgClosed E] :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card :=
natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain f)
theorem natSepDegree_map (f : E[X]) (i : E →+* K) : (f.map i).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
let _ := i.toAlgebra
simp_rw [show i = algebraMap E K by rfl, natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure K),
aroots_def, map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_C_mul _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_smul_nonzero {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(x • f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_smul_nonzero _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_pow {n : ℕ} : (f ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_pow]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simp only [h, zero_smul, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.card_empty, ite_true]
simp only [h, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ n h, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(f ^ n).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by simp_rw [natSepDegree_pow, hn, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n : F[X]).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow {x : F} {n : ℕ} :
((X - C x) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul_X_sub_C_pow {x y : F} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * (X - C y) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_C_mul _ hx, natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow]
theorem natSepDegree_mul (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree ≤ f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· simp only [h, natSepDegree_zero, zero_le]
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add]
exact Finset.card_union_le _ _
theorem natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree ↔ (f = 0 ∧ g = 0) ∨ IsCoprime f g := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· rw [mul_eq_zero] at h
wlog hf : f = 0 generalizing f g
· simpa only [mul_comm, add_comm, and_comm,
isCoprime_comm] using this g f h.symm (h.resolve_left hf)
rw [hf, zero_mul, natSepDegree_zero, zero_add, isCoprime_zero_left, isUnit_iff, eq_comm,
natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff, natDegree_eq_zero]
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact .inl ⟨rfl, by rw [← h, hx, map_zero]⟩
exact .inr ⟨x, Ne.isUnit hx, h⟩
rintro (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨x, -, h⟩)
· exact ⟨0, by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
exact ⟨x, h⟩
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add,
Finset.card_union_eq_card_add_card, Finset.disjoint_iff_ne, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
refine ⟨fun H ↦ .inr (isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (not_and.2 fun _ ↦ h.2)
fun u hu ⟨v, hf⟩ ⟨w, hg⟩ ↦ ?_), ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero
(AlgebraicClosure F) _ (degree_pos_of_irreducible hu).ne'
exact H x ⟨h.1, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hf)⟩
x ⟨h.2, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hg)⟩ rfl
rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | hc)
· exact (h.1 rfl).elim
rintro x hf _ hg rfl
obtain ⟨u, v, hfg⟩ := hc
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hf.2, hg.2, mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_ne_one] using congr(aeval x $hfg)
theorem natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime (g : F[X]) (hc : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree :=
(natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff f g).2 (.inr hc)
theorem natSepDegree_le_of_dvd (g : F[X]) (h1 : f ∣ g) (h2 : g ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree ≤ g.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F)]
exact Finset.card_le_card <| Multiset.toFinset_subset.mpr <|
Multiset.Le.subset <| roots.le_of_dvd (map_ne_zero h2) <| map_dvd _ h1
/-- If a field `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f`
and `f` have the same separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_expand (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {n : ℕ} :
(expand F (q ^ n) f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
obtain - | hprime := hF
· simp only [one_pow, expand_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
classical
simpa only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_def, map_expand,
Fintype.card_coe] using Fintype.card_eq.2
⟨(f.map (algebraMap F (AlgebraicClosure F))).rootsExpandPowEquivRoots q n⟩
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (n : ℕ) (y : F) :
(X ^ q ^ n - C y).natSepDegree = 1 := by
rw [← expand_X, ← expand_C (q ^ n), ← map_sub, natSepDegree_expand, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
variable {f} in
/-- If `g` is a separable contraction of `f`, then the separable degree of `f` is equal to
the degree of `g`. -/
theorem IsSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq {g : Polynomial F} {q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q]
(h : IsSeparableContraction q f g) : f.natSepDegree = g.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨h1, m, h2⟩ := h
rw [← h2, natSepDegree_expand, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree]
variable {f} in
/-- If a polynomial has separable contraction, then its separable degree is equal to the degree of
the given separable contraction. -/
theorem HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
{q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q] (hf : f.HasSeparableContraction q) :
f.natSepDegree = hf.degree := hf.isSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
end Polynomial
namespace Irreducible
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
/-- The separable degree of an irreducible polynomial divides its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree (h : Irreducible f) :
f.natSepDegree ∣ f.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨q, _⟩ := ExpChar.exists F
have hf := h.hasSeparableContraction q
rw [hf.natSepDegree_eq]
exact hf.dvd_degree
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨g, h1, n, rfl⟩ := hi.hasSeparableContraction q
have h2 : g.natDegree = 1 := by
rwa [natSepDegree_expand _ q, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree] at h
rw [((monic_expand_iff <| expChar_pow_pos F q n).mp hm).eq_X_add_C h2]
exact ⟨n, -(g.coeff 0), by rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp_rw [hi.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q hm, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
end Irreducible
namespace Polynomial
namespace Monic
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible' := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic'
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic
/-- If a monic polynomial of separable degree one splits, then it is of form `(X - C y) ^ m` for
some non-zero natural number `m` and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_splits (hm : f.Monic)
(hs : f.Splits (RingHom.id F))
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X - C y) ^ m := by
classical
have h1 := eq_prod_roots_of_monic_of_splits_id hm hs
have h2 := (natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f hs).symm
rw [h, aroots_def, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_one_iff] at h2
obtain ⟨h2, y, h3⟩ := h2
exact ⟨_, y, h2, by rwa [h3, Multiset.map_nsmul, Multiset.map_singleton, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Multiset.prod_singleton] at h1⟩
/-- If a monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one, then it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some natural number `n`,
and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no `q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q]
(hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible f) (h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F),
(n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hf⟩ := (hm.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible q hi).1 h
cases id ‹ExpChar F q› with
| zero =>
simp_rw [one_pow, pow_one] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨0, y, .inl rfl, hf⟩
| prime hq =>
refine ⟨n, y, (em _).imp id fun hn ⟨z, hy⟩ ↦ ?_, hf⟩
haveI := expChar_of_injective_ringHom (R := F) C_injective q
rw [hf, ← Nat.succ_pred hn, pow_succ, pow_mul, ← hy, frobenius_def, map_pow,
← sub_pow_expChar] at hi
exact not_irreducible_pow hq.ne_one hi
/-- If a monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree
| one, then it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no
`q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F),
m ≠ 0 ∧ (n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨p, hM, hI, hf⟩ := exists_monic_irreducible_factor _ <| not_isUnit_of_natDegree_pos _
<| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).1 (h.symm ▸ Nat.one_ne_zero)
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableDegree.lean | 584 | 591 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,725 | 2,729 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Action.Synonym
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements
This file defines typeclasses to reason about monotonicity of the operations
* `b ↦ a • b`, "left scalar multiplication"
* `a ↦ a • b`, "right scalar multiplication"
We use eight typeclasses to encode the various properties we care about for those two operations.
These typeclasses are meant to be mostly internal to this file, to set up each lemma in the
appropriate generality.
Less granular typeclasses like `OrderedAddCommMonoid`, `LinearOrderedField`, `OrderedSMul` should be
enough for most purposes, and the system is set up so that they imply the correct granular
typeclasses here. If those are enough for you, you may stop reading here! Else, beware that what
follows is a bit technical.
## Definitions
In all that follows, `α` and `β` are orders which have a `0` and such that `α` acts on `β` by scalar
multiplication. Note however that we do not use lawfulness of this action in most of the file. Hence
`•` should be considered here as a mostly arbitrary function `α → β → β`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about left scalar multiplication (`b ↦ a • b`):
* `PosSMulMono`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `b₁ ≤ b₂` implies `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulStrictMono`: If `a > 0`, then `b₁ < b₂` implies `a • b₁ < a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLT`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `a • b₁ < a • b₂` implies `b₁ < b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLE`: If `a > 0`, then `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` implies `b₁ ≤ b₂`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about right scalar multiplication (`a ↦ a • b`):
* `SMulPosMono`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ ≤ a₂` implies `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosStrictMono`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ < a₂` implies `a₁ • b < a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ • b < a₂ • b` implies `a₁ < a₂`.
* `SMulPosReflectLE`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` implies `a₁ ≤ a₂`.
## Constructors
The four typeclasses about nonnegativity can usually be checked only on positive inputs due to their
condition becoming trivial when `a = 0` or `b = 0`. We therefore make the following constructors
available: `PosSMulMono.of_pos`, `PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos`, `SMulPosMono.of_pos`,
`SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos`
## Implications
As `α` and `β` get more and more structure, those typeclasses end up being equivalent. The commonly
used implications are:
* When `α`, `β` are partial orders:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulMono`
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosReflectLT`
* When `β` is a linear order:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* `PosSMulReflectLT → PosSMulMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLT → SMulPosMono` (not registered as instance)
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a linear order:
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosReflectLE`
* When `α` is an ordered ring, `β` an ordered group and also an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulStrictMono → SMulPosStrictMono`
* When `α` is an linear ordered semifield, `β` is an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* When `α` is a semiring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a ring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `SMulPosMono → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
Further, the bundled non-granular typeclasses imply the granular ones like so:
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulStrictMono`
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulReflectLT`
Unless otherwise stated, all these implications are registered as instances,
which means that in practice you should not worry about these implications.
However, if you encounter a case where you think a statement is true but
not covered by the current implications, please bring it up on Zulip!
## Implementation notes
This file uses custom typeclasses instead of abbreviations of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
because:
* They get displayed as classes in the docs. In particular, one can see their list of instances,
instead of their instances being invariably dumped to the `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
list.
* They don't pollute other typeclass searches. Having many abbreviations of the same typeclass for
different purposes always felt like a performance issue (more instances with the same key, for no
added benefit), and indeed making the classes here abbreviation previous creates timeouts due to
the higher number of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` instances.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`/`SMulPosReflectLE` do not fit in the framework since they relate `≤` on two
different types. So we would have to generalise `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` to three
types and two relations.
* Very minor, but the constructors let you work with `a : α`, `h : 0 ≤ a` instead of
`a : {a : α // 0 ≤ a}`. This actually makes some instances surprisingly cleaner to prove.
* The `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` framework is only useful to automate very simple logic
anyway. It is easily copied over.
In the future, it would be good to make the corresponding typeclasses in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled` custom typeclasses too.
## TODO
This file acts as a substitute for `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SMul`. We now need to
* finish the transition by deleting the duplicate lemmas
* rearrange the non-duplicate lemmas into new files
* generalise (most of) the lemmas from `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module` to here
* rethink `OrderedSMul`
-/
open OrderDual
variable (α β : Type*)
section Defs
variable [SMul α β] [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `b₁ < b₂ → a • b₁ < a • b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ < b₂) : a • b₁ < a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ < a • b₂) : b₁ < b₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) : b₁ ≤ b₂
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ • b < a₂ • b` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ < a₂) : a₁ • b < a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) : a₁ < a₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b → a₁ ≤ a₂` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) : a₁ ≤ a₂
end Right
end Defs
variable {α β} {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β}
section Mul
variable [Zero α] [Mul α] [Preorder α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulMono.toPosSMulMono [PosMulMono α] : PosSMulMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosMulStrictMono α] :
PosSMulStrictMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosMulReflectLT α] :
PosSMulReflectLT α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosMulReflectLE α] :
PosSMulReflectLE α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosMono.toSMulPosMono [MulPosMono α] : SMulPosMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosStrictMono [MulPosStrictMono α] :
SMulPosStrictMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLT [MulPosReflectLT α] :
SMulPosReflectLT α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLE [MulPosReflectLE α] :
SMulPosReflectLE α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_right h hb
end Mul
section SMul
variable [SMul α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
lemma monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone ((a • ·) : β → β) :=
PosSMulMono.elim ha
lemma strictMono_smul_left_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
StrictMono ((a • ·) : β → β) := PosSMulStrictMono.elim ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left [PosSMulMono α β] (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ := monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (hb : b₁ < b₂) (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ := strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha hb
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b₁ < a • b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b₁ < b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLT.elim ha h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (h : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) (ha : 0 < a) : b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLE.elim ha h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left := le_of_smul_le_smul_left
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha, fun h ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha.le, fun hb ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha⟩
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) : Monotone ((· • b) : α → β) :=
SMulPosMono.elim hb
lemma strictMono_smul_right_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
StrictMono ((· • b) : α → β) := SMulPosStrictMono.elim hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b := monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg hb ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b := strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb ha
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ < a₂ := SMulPosReflectLT.elim hb h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (h : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ := SMulPosReflectLE.elim hb h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_right := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right := le_of_smul_le_smul_right
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_right h hb, fun ha ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b ↔ a₁ < a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb.le, fun ha ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb⟩
end Right
section LeftRight
variable [Zero α] [Zero β]
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
end LeftRight
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulReflectLE α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).le_iff_le.1
lemma PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulReflectLE α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_le.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulStrictMono_iff_PosSMulReflectLE : PosSMulStrictMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono⟩
instance PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).reflect_lt
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulMono_iff_posSMulReflectLT : PosSMulMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono⟩
lemma smul_max_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • max b₁ b₂ = max (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_max
lemma smul_min_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • min b₁ b₂ = min (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_min
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosReflectLE α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_le.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h hb
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosReflectLE α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_lt.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_lt <| smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_le.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_le <| smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma smulPosStrictMono_iff_SMulPosReflectLE : SMulPosStrictMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono⟩
lemma smulPosMono_iff_smulPosReflectLT : SMulPosMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono⟩
end Right
end LinearOrder
end SMul
section SMulZeroClass
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
lemma smul_neg_of_pos_of_neg [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₁ := 0) (b₂ := b)
lemma smul_neg_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b < 0 ↔ b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₂ := (0 : β))
lemma smul_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 < b :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
end Preorder
end SMulZeroClass
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulWithZero α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos' [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma smul_neg_of_neg_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < a := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb (a₁ := 0) (a₂ := a)
lemma smul_nonneg' [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma pos_iff_pos_of_smul_pos [PosSMulReflectLT α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
0 < a ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨pos_of_smul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt, pos_of_smul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
end Preorder
|
section PartialOrder
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Module/Defs.lean | 520 | 521 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Cuma Kökmen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Cuma Kökmen, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Util.Superscript
/-!
# Integral over a torus in `ℂⁿ`
In this file we define the integral of a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` over a torus
`{z : ℂⁿ | ∀ i, z i ∈ Metric.sphere (c i) (R i)}`. In order to do this, we define
`torusMap (c : ℂⁿ) (R θ : ℝⁿ)` to be the point in `ℂⁿ` given by $z_k=c_k+R_ke^{θ_ki}$,
where $i$ is the imaginary unit, then define `torusIntegral f c R` as the integral over
the cube $[0, (fun _ ↦ 2π)] = \{θ\|∀ k, 0 ≤ θ_k ≤ 2π\}$ of the Jacobian of the
`torusMap` multiplied by `f (torusMap c R θ)`.
We also define a predicate saying that `f ∘ torusMap c R` is integrable on the cube
`[0, (fun _ ↦ 2π)]`.
## Main definitions
* `torusMap c R`: the generalized multidimensional exponential map from `ℝⁿ` to `ℂⁿ` that sends
$θ=(θ_0,…,θ_{n-1})$ to $z=(z_0,…,z_{n-1})$, where $z_k= c_k + R_ke^{θ_k i}$;
* `TorusIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` is integrable over the generalized torus
with center `c : ℂⁿ` and radius `R : ℝⁿ` if `f ∘ torusMap c R` is integrable on the
closed cube `Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) (fun _ ↦ 2 * π)`;
* `torusIntegral f c R`: the integral of a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` over a torus with
center `c ∈ ℂⁿ` and radius `R ∈ ℝⁿ` defined as
$\iiint_{[0, 2 * π]} (∏_{k = 1}^{n} i R_k e^{θ_k * i}) • f (c + Re^{θ_k i})\,dθ_0…dθ_{k-1}$.
## Main statements
* `torusIntegral_dim0`, `torusIntegral_dim1`, `torusIntegral_succ`: formulas for `torusIntegral`
in cases of dimension `0`, `1`, and `n + 1`.
## Notations
- `ℝ⁰`, `ℝ¹`, `ℝⁿ`, `ℝⁿ⁺¹`: local notation for `Fin 0 → ℝ`, `Fin 1 → ℝ`, `Fin n → ℝ`, and
`Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`, respectively;
- `ℂ⁰`, `ℂ¹`, `ℂⁿ`, `ℂⁿ⁺¹`: local notation for `Fin 0 → ℂ`, `Fin 1 → ℂ`, `Fin n → ℂ`, and
`Fin (n + 1) → ℂ`, respectively;
- `∯ z in T(c, R), f z`: notation for `torusIntegral f c R`;
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for `circleIntegral f c R`, defined elsewhere;
- `∏ k, f k`: notation for `Finset.prod`, defined elsewhere;
- `π`: notation for `Real.pi`, defined elsewhere.
## Tags
integral, torus
-/
variable {n : ℕ}
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open Complex Set MeasureTheory Function Filter TopologicalSpace
open Mathlib.Tactic (superscriptTerm)
open scoped Real
local syntax:arg term:max noWs superscriptTerm : term
local macro_rules | `($t:term$n:superscript) => `(Fin $n → $t)
/-!
### `torusMap`, a parametrization of a torus
-/
/-- The n dimensional exponential map $θ_i ↦ c + R e^{θ_i*I}, θ ∈ ℝⁿ$ representing
a torus in `ℂⁿ` with center `c ∈ ℂⁿ` and generalized radius `R ∈ ℝⁿ`, so we can adjust
it to every n axis. -/
def torusMap (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) : ℝⁿ → ℂⁿ := fun θ i => c i + R i * exp (θ i * I)
theorem torusMap_sub_center (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) (θ : ℝⁿ) : torusMap c R θ - c = torusMap 0 R θ := by
ext1 i; simp [torusMap]
theorem torusMap_eq_center_iff {c : ℂⁿ} {R : ℝⁿ} {θ : ℝⁿ} : torusMap c R θ = c ↔ R = 0 := by
simp [funext_iff, torusMap, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
| theorem torusMap_zero_radius (c : ℂⁿ) : torusMap c 0 = const ℝⁿ c :=
funext fun _ ↦ torusMap_eq_center_iff.2 rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/TorusIntegral.lean | 88 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
| Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 322 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
/-!
# Lifting groups with zero along injective/surjective maps
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ M₀' G₀' : Type*}
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀]
/-- Pull back a `MulZeroClass` instance along an injective function.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.mulZeroClass [Mul M₀'] [Zero M₀'] (f : M₀' → M₀)
(hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) = f a * f b) :
MulZeroClass M₀' where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
zero_mul a := hf <| by simp only [mul, zero, zero_mul]
mul_zero a := hf <| by simp only [mul, zero, mul_zero]
/-- Push forward a `MulZeroClass` instance along a surjective function.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Surjective.mulZeroClass [Mul M₀'] [Zero M₀'] (f : M₀ → M₀')
(hf : Surjective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) = f a * f b) :
MulZeroClass M₀' where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
mul_zero := hf.forall.2 fun x => by simp only [← zero, ← mul, mul_zero]
zero_mul := hf.forall.2 fun x => by simp only [← zero, ← mul, zero_mul]
end MulZeroClass
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀'] [Zero M₀']
(f : M₀ → M₀') (hf : Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
include hf zero mul
/-- Pull back a `NoZeroDivisors` instance along an injective function. -/
protected theorem Function.Injective.noZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors M₀'] : NoZeroDivisors M₀ where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} H :=
have : f a * f b = 0 := by rw [← mul, H, zero]
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).imp
(fun H ↦ hf <| by rwa [zero]) fun H ↦ hf <| by rwa [zero]
protected theorem Function.Injective.isLeftCancelMulZero
[IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀'] : IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀ where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero Hne He := by
have := congr_arg f He
rw [mul, mul] at this
exact hf (mul_left_cancel₀ (fun Hfa => Hne <| hf <| by rw [Hfa, zero]) this)
protected theorem Function.Injective.isRightCancelMulZero
[IsRightCancelMulZero M₀'] : IsRightCancelMulZero M₀ where
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero Hne He := by
| have := congr_arg f He
rw [mul, mul] at this
exact hf (mul_right_cancel₀ (fun Hfa => Hne <| hf <| by rw [Hfa, zero]) this)
protected theorem Function.Injective.isCancelMulZero
[IsCancelMulZero M₀'] : IsCancelMulZero M₀ where
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/InjSurj.lean | 70 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
(l.zipWith ((fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) (List.range l.length)).sum =
b * (l.zipWith (fun a i => a * b ^ i) (List.range l.length)).sum := by
suffices
l.zipWith (fun a i : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) (List.range l.length) =
l.zipWith (fun a i=> b * (a * b ^ i)) (List.range l.length)
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_zipIdx_map, List.zipIdx_eq_zip_range', List.map_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr, ← List.range_eq_range']
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_right, ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx_aux] using
Or.inl hl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d List.mem_cons_self
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
rcases b with - | b
· rcases n with - | n
· rfl
· simp
· rcases b with - | b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n h => ?_
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· simp [IH, h]
aesop
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
lemma ofDigits_inj_of_len_eq {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {L1 L2 : List ℕ}
(len : L1.length = L2.length) (w1 : ∀ l ∈ L1, l < b) (w2 : ∀ l ∈ L2, l < b)
(h : ofDigits b L1 = ofDigits b L2) : L1 = L2 := by
induction' L1 with D L ih generalizing L2
· simp only [List.length_nil] at len
exact (List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp len.symm).symm
obtain ⟨d, l, rfl⟩ := List.exists_cons_of_length_eq_add_one len.symm
simp only [List.length_cons, add_left_inj] at len
simp only [ofDigits_cons] at h
have eqd : D = d := by
have H : (D + b * ofDigits b L) % b = (d + b * ofDigits b l) % b := by rw [h]
simpa [mod_eq_of_lt (w2 d List.mem_cons_self),
mod_eq_of_lt (w1 D List.mem_cons_self)] using H
simp only [eqd, add_right_inj, mul_left_cancel_iff_of_pos (zero_lt_of_lt hb)] at h
have := ih len (fun a ha ↦ w1 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem D ha)
(fun a ha ↦ w2 a <| List.mem_cons_of_mem d ha) h
rw [eqd, this]
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them -/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero_iff, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn with | ind n IH => ?_
intro d hd
rcases n with - | n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by linarith)
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd List.mem_cons_self
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
theorem digits_base_pow_mul {b k m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b (b ^ k * m) = List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hmb : 0 < m * b := lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' hm hb
let h1 := digits_def' hb hmb
have h2 : m = m * b / b :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_left (ne_zero_of_lt hb) rfl
simp only [mul_mod_left, ← h2] at h1
rw [List.replicate_succ', List.append_assoc, List.singleton_append, ← h1, ← ih hmb]
ring_nf
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_append_zeroes_append_digits {b k m n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hm : 0 < m) :
digits b n ++ List.replicate k 0 ++ digits b m =
digits b (n + b ^ ((digits b n).length + k) * m) := by
rw [List.append_assoc, ← digits_base_pow_mul hb hm]
simp only [digits_append_digits (zero_lt_of_lt hb), digits_inj_iff, add_right_inj]
ring
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp +arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction L with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ hi =>
simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
theorem digit_sum_le (p n : ℕ) : List.sum (digits p n) ≤ n := by
induction' n with n
· exact digits_zero _ ▸ Nat.le_refl (List.sum [])
· induction' p with p
· rw [digits_zero_succ, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil, add_zero]
· nth_rw 2 [← ofDigits_digits p.succ (n + 1)]
rw [← ofDigits_one <| digits p.succ n.succ]
exact ofDigits_monotone (digits p.succ n.succ) <| Nat.succ_pos p
theorem pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.getLast hl ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * ofDigits (b + 2) l := by
rw [← List.dropLast_append_getLast hl]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length, zero_add, List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_append,
List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
have : 0 < l.getLast hl := by rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero]
convert Nat.mul_le_mul_left ((b + 2) ^ (l.length - 1)) this using 1
rw [Nat.mul_one]
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
(b+2)^((number of digits in the base (b+2) representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length ≤ (b + 2) * m := by
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [] := digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm
convert @pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits b (digits (b+2) m)
this (getLast_digit_ne_zero _ hm)
rw [ofDigits_digits]
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
b^((number of digits in the base b representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) :
m ≠ 0 → b ^ (digits b m).length ≤ b * m := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p` is the same as interpreting the tail.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail {p : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) : ofDigits p digits / p = ofDigits p digits.tail := by
induction' digits with hd tl
· simp [ofDigits]
· refine Eq.trans (add_mul_div_left hd _ hpos) ?_
rw [Nat.div_eq_of_lt <| w₁ _ List.mem_cons_self, zero_add]
rfl
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p^i` is the same as dropping `i`.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop
{p : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) :
ofDigits p digits / p ^ i = ofDigits p (digits.drop i) := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· rw [Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, hi, ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail hpos
(List.drop i digits) fun x hx ↦ w₁ x <| List.mem_of_mem_drop hx, ← List.drop_one,
List.drop_drop, add_comm]
/-- Dividing `n` by `p^i` is like truncating the first `i` digits of `n` in base `p`.
-/
lemma self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop {p : ℕ} (i n : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ p) :
n / p ^ i = ofDigits p ((p.digits n).drop i) := by
convert ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop i (zero_lt_of_lt h) (p.digits n)
(fun l hl ↦ digits_lt_base h hl)
exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
open Finset
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ}
(L : List ℕ) {h_nonempty} (h_ne_zero : L.getLast h_nonempty ≠ 0) (h_lt : ∀ l ∈ L, l < p) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range L.length, (ofDigits p L) / p ^ i.succ = (ofDigits p L) - L.sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· induction' L with hd tl ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· simp only [List.length_cons, List.sum_cons, self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h,
digits_ofDigits p h (hd :: tl) h_lt (fun _ => h_ne_zero)]
simp only [ofDigits]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_id]
simp only [List.drop, List.drop_length]
obtain rfl | h' := em <| tl = []
· simp [ofDigits]
· have w₁' := fun l hl ↦ h_lt l <| List.mem_cons_of_mem hd hl
have w₂' := fun (h : tl ≠ []) ↦ (List.getLast_cons h) ▸ h_ne_zero
have ih := ih (w₂' h') w₁'
simp only [self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h, digits_ofDigits p h tl w₁' w₂',
← Nat.one_add] at ih
have := sum_singleton (fun x ↦ ofDigits p <| tl.drop x) tl.length
rw [← Ico_succ_singleton, List.drop_length, ofDigits] at this
have h₁ : 1 ≤ tl.length := List.length_pos_iff.mpr h'
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ <| h₁, ← add_zero (∑ x ∈ Ico _ _, ofDigits p (tl.drop x)),
← this, sum_Ico_consecutive _ h₁ <| (le_add_right tl.length 1),
← sum_Ico_add _ 0 tl.length 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, mul_add, mul_add, ih, range_one, sum_singleton, List.drop, ofDigits,
mul_zero, add_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <| sum_le_ofDigits _ <| Nat.le_of_lt h]
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul <| ofDigits p tl]
rw [← add_mul, Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_of_lt h), Nat.add_sub_add_left]
· simp [ofDigits_one]
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases L
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits]
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (log p n).succ, n / p ^ i.succ = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· convert sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits (p.digits n) (getLast_digit_ne_zero p hn) <|
(fun l a ↦ digits_lt_base h a)
· refine (digits_len p n h hn).symm
all_goals exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
· simp
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases n
all_goals simp
/-! ### Binary -/
theorem digits_two_eq_bits (n : ℕ) : digits 2 n = n.bits.map fun b => cond b 1 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRecFromOne with b n h ih
· simp
· simp
rw [bits_append_bit _ _ fun hn => absurd hn h]
cases b
· rw [digits_def' one_lt_two]
· simpa [Nat.bit]
· simpa [Nat.bit, pos_iff_ne_zero]
· simpa [Nat.bit, add_comm, digits_add 2 one_lt_two 1 n, Nat.add_mul_div_left]
/-! ### Modular Arithmetic -/
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
theorem dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits {α : Type*} [CommRing α] {a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b)
(L : List ℕ) : k ∣ ofDigits a L - ofDigits b L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· change k ∣ 0 - 0
simp
· simp only [ofDigits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih
theorem ofDigits_modEq' (b b' : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [MOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [MOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Nat.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod]
theorem ofDigits_modEq (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [MOD k] :=
ofDigits_modEq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq k).symm L
theorem ofDigits_mod (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_modEq b k L
theorem ofDigits_mod_eq_head! (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) : ofDigits b l % b = l.head! % b := by
induction l <;> simp [Nat.ofDigits, Int.ModEq]
theorem head!_digits {b n : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 1) : (Nat.digits b n).head! = n % b := by
by_cases hb : 1 < b
· rcases n with _ | n
· simp
· nth_rw 2 [← Nat.ofDigits_digits b (n + 1)]
rw [Nat.ofDigits_mod_eq_head! _ _]
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.digits_lt_base hb <| List.head!_mem_self <|
Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).symm
· rcases n with _ | _ <;> simp_all [show b = 0 by omega]
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq' (b b' : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [ZMOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [ZMOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Int.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod]
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [ZMOD k] :=
ofDigits_zmodeq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq ↑k).symm L
theorem ofDigits_zmod (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_zmodeq b k L
theorem modEq_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits b' n).sum [MOD b] := by
rw [← ofDigits_one]
conv =>
congr
· skip
· rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
convert ofDigits_modEq b' b (digits b' n)
exact h.symm
theorem modEq_three_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 3] :=
| modEq_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem modEq_nine_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 9] :=
modEq_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
theorem zmodeq_ofDigits_digits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : b' ≡ c [ZMOD b]) (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ofDigits c (digits b' n) [ZMOD b] := by
conv =>
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 679 | 686 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
| refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 447 | 450 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
| rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 375 | 375 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Pell's equation and Matiyasevic's theorem
This file solves Pell's equation, i.e. integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`
*in the special case that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`*.
This is then applied to prove Matiyasevic's theorem that the power
function is Diophantine, which is the last key ingredient in the solution to Hilbert's tenth
problem. For the definition of Diophantine function, see `NumberTheory.Dioph`.
For results on Pell's equation for arbitrary (positive, non-square) `d`, see
`NumberTheory.Pell`.
## Main definition
* `pell` is a function assigning to a natural number `n` the `n`-th solution to Pell's equation
constructed recursively from the initial solution `(0, 1)`.
## Main statements
* `eq_pell` shows that every solution to Pell's equation is recursively obtained using `pell`
* `matiyasevic` shows that a certain system of Diophantine equations has a solution if and only if
the first variable is the `x`-component in a solution to Pell's equation - the key step towards
Hilbert's tenth problem in Davis' version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
* `eq_pow_of_pell` shows that the power function is Diophantine.
## Implementation notes
The proof of Matiyasevic's theorem doesn't follow Matiyasevic's original account of using Fibonacci
numbers but instead Davis' variant of using solutions to Pell's equation.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevič's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Pell's equation, Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
-/
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- The property of being a solution to the Pell equation, expressed
as a property of elements of `ℤ√d`. -/
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| | ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 69 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem self_modEq_zero : p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-1, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zero (z : ℤ) : z • p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem add_zsmul_modEq (z : ℤ) : a + z • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem zsmul_add_modEq (z : ℤ) : z • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
theorem add_nsmul_modEq (n : ℕ) : a + n • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp⟩
theorem nsmul_add_modEq (n : ℕ) : n • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
namespace ModEq
protected theorem add_zsmul (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + z • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_zsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem zsmul_add (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(zsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem add_nsmul (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + n • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_nsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem nsmul_add (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(nsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem of_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD z • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * z, by rwa [mul_smul]⟩
protected theorem of_nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD n • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * n, by rwa [mul_smul, natCast_zsmul]⟩
protected theorem zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
protected theorem nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
end ModEq
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ α] (hn : z ≠ 0) :
z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_modEq_nsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
alias ⟨ModEq.zsmul_cancel, _⟩ := zsmul_modEq_zsmul
alias ⟨ModEq.nsmul_cancel, _⟩ := nsmul_modEq_nsmul
namespace ModEq
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
protected alias ⟨add_left_cancel, add⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_left
protected alias ⟨add_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_right
protected alias ⟨sub_left_cancel, sub⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_left
protected alias ⟨sub_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_right
protected theorem add_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add h
protected theorem sub_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub h
protected theorem add_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
h.add modEq_rfl
protected theorem sub_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] :=
h.sub modEq_rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : α) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_left_cancel
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : α) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_right_cancel
protected theorem sub_left_cancel' (c : α) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_left_cancel
protected theorem sub_right_cancel' (c : α) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_right_cancel
end ModEq
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq' : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ c + a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp [ModEq, sub_sub]
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ a + c ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans <| by rw [add_comm]
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add' : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans modEq_comm
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq.trans modEq_comm
@[simp]
theorem sub_modEq_zero : a - b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by simp [sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add]
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_left : a + b ≡ a [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq']
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_right : a + b ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, b = a + z • p := by
simp_rw [ModEq, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_add_zsmul : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b ≠ a + z • p := by
rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, not_exists]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) = a := by
simp_rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff,
eq_sub_iff_add_eq', eq_comm]
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) ≠ a :=
modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples.not
end AddCommGroup
@[simp]
theorem modEq_iff_int_modEq {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD z] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD z] := by
simp [ModEq, dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne α] [CharZero α]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_modEq_intCast {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (z : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD z] := by
simp_rw [ModEq, ← Int.cast_mul_eq_zsmul_cast]
norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_modEq_intCast' {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (n : ℤ)] := by
simpa using intCast_modEq_intCast (α := α) (z := n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_modEq_natCast {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
simp_rw [← Int.natCast_modEq_iff, ← modEq_iff_int_modEq, ← @intCast_modEq_intCast α,
Int.cast_natCast]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_intCast, ModEq.intCast⟩ := intCast_modEq_intCast
alias ⟨_root_.Nat.ModEq.of_natCast, ModEq.natCast⟩ := natCast_modEq_natCast
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing α] {a b c p : α}
@[simp] lemma div_modEq_div (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c ≡ b / c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p * c)] := by
simp [ModEq, ← sub_div, div_eq_iff hc, mul_assoc]
@[simp] lemma mul_modEq_mul_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c ≡ b * c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p / c)] := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← div_modEq_div (inv_ne_zero hc), div_inv_eq_mul, div_inv_eq_mul]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field α] {a b c p : α}
@[simp] lemma mul_modEq_mul_left (hc : c ≠ 0) : c * a ≡ c * b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p / c)] := by
simp [mul_comm c, hc]
end Field
end AddCommGroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 320 | 322 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
/-!
# The universal property of the even subalgebra
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.even Q`: The even subalgebra of `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
* `CliffordAlgebra.EvenHom`: The type of bilinear maps that satisfy the universal property of the
even subalgebra
* `CliffordAlgebra.even.lift`: The universal property of the even subalgebra, which states
that every bilinear map `f` with `f v v = Q v` and `f u v * f v w = Q v • f u w` is in unique
correspondence with an algebra morphism from `CliffordAlgebra.even Q`.
## Implementation notes
The approach here is outlined in "Computing with the universal properties of the Clifford algebra
and the even subalgebra" (to appear).
The broad summary is that we have two tricks available to us for implementing complex recursors on
top of `CliffordAlgebra.lift`: the first is to use morphisms as the output type, such as
`A = Module.End R N` which is how we obtained `CliffordAlgebra.foldr`; and the second is to use
`N = (N', S)` where `N'` is the value we wish to compute, and `S` is some auxiliary state passed
between one recursor invocation and the next.
For the universal property of the even subalgebra, we apply a variant of the first trick again by
choosing `S` to itself be a submodule of morphisms.
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
-- put this after `Q` since we want to talk about morphisms from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A` and
-- that order is more natural
variable {A B : Type*} [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
open scoped DirectSum
variable (Q)
/-- The even submodule `CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd Q 0` is also a subalgebra. -/
def even : Subalgebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
(evenOdd Q 0).toSubalgebra (SetLike.one_mem_graded _) fun _x _y hx hy =>
add_zero (0 : ZMod 2) ▸ SetLike.mul_mem_graded hx hy
@[simp]
theorem even_toSubmodule : Subalgebra.toSubmodule (even Q) = evenOdd Q 0 :=
rfl
variable (A)
/-- The type of bilinear maps which are accepted by `CliffordAlgebra.even.lift`. -/
@[ext]
structure EvenHom where
bilin : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] A
contract (m : M) : bilin m m = algebraMap R A (Q m)
contract_mid (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) : bilin m₁ m₂ * bilin m₂ m₃ = Q m₂ • bilin m₁ m₃
variable {A Q}
/-- Compose an `EvenHom` with an `AlgHom` on the output. -/
@[simps]
def EvenHom.compr₂ (g : EvenHom Q A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) : EvenHom Q B where
bilin := g.bilin.compr₂ f.toLinearMap
contract _m := (f.congr_arg <| g.contract _).trans <| f.commutes _
contract_mid _m₁ _m₂ _m₃ :=
(map_mul f _ _).symm.trans <| (f.congr_arg <| g.contract_mid _ _ _).trans <| map_smul f _ _
variable (Q)
/-- The embedding of pairs of vectors into the even subalgebra, as a bilinear map. -/
nonrec def even.ι : EvenHom Q (even Q) where
bilin :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (fun m₁ m₂ => ⟨ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂, ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero Q _ _⟩)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_add, add_mul]; rfl)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_smul, smul_mul_assoc]; rfl)
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [LinearMap.map_add, mul_add]; rfl) fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smul, mul_smul_comm]; rfl
contract m := Subtype.ext <| ι_sq_scalar Q m
contract_mid m₁ m₂ m₃ :=
Subtype.ext <|
calc
ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ * (ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₃) = ι Q m₁ * (ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₂ * ι Q m₃) := by
simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = Q m₂ • (ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₃) := by rw [Algebra.smul_def, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.left_comm]
instance : Inhabited (EvenHom Q (even Q)) :=
⟨even.ι Q⟩
variable (f : EvenHom Q A)
/-- Two algebra morphisms from the even subalgebra are equal if they agree on pairs of generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem even.algHom_ext ⦃f g : even Q →ₐ[R] A⦄ (h : (even.ι Q).compr₂ f = (even.ι Q).compr₂ g) :
f = g := by
rw [EvenHom.ext_iff] at h
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
induction x, hx using even_induction with
| algebraMap r =>
exact (f.commutes r).trans (g.commutes r).symm
| add x y hx hy ihx ihy =>
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) ihx ihy
exact (map_add f _ _).trans (this.trans <| (map_add g _ _).symm)
| ι_mul_ι_mul m₁ m₂ x hx ih =>
have := congr_arg₂ (· * ·) (LinearMap.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun h m₁) m₂) ih
exact (map_mul f _ _).trans (this.trans <| (map_mul g _ _).symm)
variable {Q}
namespace even.lift
/-- An auxiliary submodule used to store the half-applied values of `f`.
This is the span of elements `f'` such that `∃ x m₂, ∀ m₁, f' m₁ = f m₁ m₂ * x`. -/
private def S : Submodule R (M →ₗ[R] A) :=
Submodule.span R
{f' | ∃ x m₂, f' = LinearMap.lcomp R _ (f.bilin.flip m₂) (LinearMap.mulRight R x)}
/-- An auxiliary bilinear map that is later passed into `CliffordAlgebra.foldr`. Our desired result
is stored in the `A` part of the accumulator, while auxiliary recursion state is stored in the `S f`
part. -/
private def fFold : M →ₗ[R] A × S f →ₗ[R] A × S f :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R
(fun m acc =>
/- We could write this `snd` term in a point-free style as follows, but it wouldn't help as we
don't have any prod or subtype combinators to deal with n-linear maps of this degree.
```lean
(LinearMap.lcomp R _ (Algebra.lmul R A).to_linear_map.flip).comp <|
(LinearMap.llcomp R M A A).flip.comp f.flip : M →ₗ[R] A →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] A)
```
-/
(acc.2.val m,
⟨(LinearMap.mulRight R acc.1).comp (f.bilin.flip m), Submodule.subset_span <| ⟨_, _, rfl⟩⟩))
(fun m₁ m₂ a =>
Prod.ext (LinearMap.map_add _ m₁ m₂)
(Subtype.ext <|
LinearMap.ext fun m₃ =>
show f.bilin m₃ (m₁ + m₂) * a.1 = f.bilin m₃ m₁ * a.1 + f.bilin m₃ m₂ * a.1 by
rw [map_add, add_mul]))
(fun c m a =>
Prod.ext (LinearMap.map_smul _ c m)
(Subtype.ext <|
LinearMap.ext fun m₃ =>
show f.bilin m₃ (c • m) * a.1 = c • (f.bilin m₃ m * a.1) by
rw [LinearMap.map_smul, smul_mul_assoc]))
(fun _ _ _ => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => mul_add _ _ _))
fun _ _ _ => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => mul_smul_comm _ _ _)
@[simp]
private theorem fst_fFold_fFold (m₁ m₂ : M) (x : A × S f) :
(fFold f m₁ (fFold f m₂ x)).fst = f.bilin m₁ m₂ * x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
private theorem snd_fFold_fFold (m₁ m₂ m₃ : M) (x : A × S f) :
((fFold f m₁ (fFold f m₂ x)).snd : M →ₗ[R] A) m₃ = f.bilin m₃ m₁ * (x.snd : M →ₗ[R] A) m₂ :=
rfl
private theorem fFold_fFold (m : M) (x : A × S f) : fFold f m (fFold f m x) = Q m • x := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨g, hg⟩⟩ := x
ext : 2
· change f.bilin m m * a = Q m • a
rw [Algebra.smul_def, f.contract]
· ext m₁
change f.bilin _ _ * g m = Q m • g m₁
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hg
· rintro _ ⟨b, m₃, rfl⟩
change f.bilin _ _ * (f.bilin _ _ * b) = Q m • (f.bilin _ _ * b)
rw [← smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, f.contract_mid]
· suffices f.bilin m₁ m * 0 = Q m • (0 : A) by simp
simp
| · rintro x y _hx _hy ihx ihy
rw [LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, mul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]
· rintro x hx _c ihx
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, mul_smul_comm, ihx, smul_comm]
/-- The final auxiliary construction for `CliffordAlgebra.even.lift`. This map is the forwards
direction of that equivalence, but not in the fully-bundled form. -/
@[simps! -isSimp apply]
def aux (f : EvenHom Q A) : CliffordAlgebra.even Q →ₗ[R] A := by
refine ?_ ∘ₗ (even Q).val.toLinearMap
exact LinearMap.fst R _ _ ∘ₗ foldr Q (fFold f) (fFold_fFold f) (1, 0)
@[simp]
theorem aux_one : aux f 1 = 1 :=
congr_arg Prod.fst (foldr_one _ _ _ _)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Even.lean | 181 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
/-!
# Sets closed under join/meet
This file defines predicates for sets closed under `⊔` and shows that each set in a join-semilattice
generates a join-closed set and that a semilattice where every directed set has a least upper bound
is automatically complete. All dually for `⊓`.
## Main declarations
* `SupClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under join (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊔ b ∈ s`).
* `InfClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊓ b ∈ s`).
* `IsSublattice`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet and join.
* `supClosure`: Sup-closure. Smallest sup-closed set containing a given set.
* `infClosure`: Inf-closure. Smallest inf-closed set containing a given set.
* `latticeClosure`: Smallest sublattice containing a given set.
* `SemilatticeSup.toCompleteSemilatticeSup`: A join-semilattice where every sup-closed set has a
least upper bound is automatically complete.
* `SemilatticeInf.toCompleteSemilatticeInf`: A meet-semilattice where every inf-closed set has a
greatest lower bound is automatically complete.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {F α β : Type*}
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
section Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is *sup-closed* if `a ⊔ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`. -/
def SupClosed (s : Set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ⊔ b ∈ s
@[simp] lemma supClosed_empty : SupClosed (∅ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_singleton : SupClosed ({a} : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_univ : SupClosed (univ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
lemma SupClosed.inter (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, SupClosed s) : SupClosed (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _s hs ↦ hS _ hs (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs)
lemma supClosed_iInter (hf : ∀ i, SupClosed (f i)) : SupClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
supClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma SupClosed.directedOn (hs : SupClosed s) : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨_, hs ha hb, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.supClosed (hs : IsUpperSet s) : SupClosed s := fun _a _ _b ↦ hs le_sup_right
lemma SupClosed.preimage [FunLike F β α] [SupHomClass F β α] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by simpa [map_sup] using hs ha hb
lemma SupClosed.image [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← map_sup]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| hs ha hb
lemma supClosed_range [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (f : F) : SupClosed (Set.range f) := by
simpa using supClosed_univ.image f
lemma SupClosed.prod {t : Set β} (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SemilatticeSup (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, SupClosed (t i)) : SupClosed (s.pi t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _i hi ↦ ht _ hi (ha _ hi) (hb _ hi)
lemma SupClosed.insert_upperBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ upperBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
aesop
lemma SupClosed.insert_lowerBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
have ha' : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b := fun _ a ↦ ha a
aesop
end Set
section Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {t : Finset ι} {a : α}
open Finset
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup'_mem (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup' ht f ∈ s :=
sup'_induction _ _ hs
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup_mem [OrderBot α] (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup f ∈ s :=
sup'_eq_sup ht f ▸ hs.finsetSup'_mem ht
end Finset
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
section Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is *inf-closed* if `a ⊓ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`. -/
def InfClosed (s : Set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ⊓ b ∈ s
@[simp] lemma infClosed_empty : InfClosed (∅ : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
@[simp] lemma infClosed_singleton : InfClosed ({a} : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
@[simp] lemma infClosed_univ : InfClosed (univ : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
lemma InfClosed.inter (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : InfClosed t) : InfClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma infClosed_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, InfClosed s) : InfClosed (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _s hs ↦ hS _ hs (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs)
lemma infClosed_iInter (hf : ∀ i, InfClosed (f i)) : InfClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
infClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma InfClosed.codirectedOn (hs : InfClosed s) : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨_, hs ha hb, inf_le_left, inf_le_right⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.infClosed (hs : IsLowerSet s) : InfClosed s := fun _a _ _b ↦ hs inf_le_right
lemma InfClosed.preimage [FunLike F β α] [InfHomClass F β α] (hs : InfClosed s) (f : F) :
InfClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by simpa [map_inf] using hs ha hb
lemma InfClosed.image [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β] (hs : InfClosed s) (f : F) :
InfClosed (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← map_inf]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| hs ha hb
lemma infClosed_range [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β] (f : F) : InfClosed (Set.range f) := by
simpa using infClosed_univ.image f
lemma InfClosed.prod {t : Set β} (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : InfClosed t) : InfClosed (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma infClosed_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SemilatticeInf (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, InfClosed (t i)) : InfClosed (s.pi t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _i hi ↦ ht _ hi (ha _ hi) (hb _ hi)
lemma InfClosed.insert_upperBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : InfClosed s) (ha : a ∈ upperBounds s) :
InfClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [InfClosed]
have ha' : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a := fun _ a ↦ ha a
aesop
lemma InfClosed.insert_lowerBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : InfClosed s) (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) :
InfClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [InfClosed]
aesop
end Set
section Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {t : Finset ι} {a : α}
open Finset
lemma InfClosed.finsetInf'_mem (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.inf' ht f ∈ s :=
inf'_induction _ _ hs
lemma InfClosed.finsetInf_mem [OrderTop α] (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.inf f ∈ s :=
inf'_eq_inf ht f ▸ hs.finsetInf'_mem ht
end Finset
end SemilatticeInf
open Finset OrderDual
section Lattice
variable {ι : Sort*} [Lattice α] [Lattice β] {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is a *sublattice* if `a ⊔ b ∈ s` and `a ⊓ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`.
Note: This is not the preferred way to declare a sublattice. One should instead use `Sublattice`.
TODO: Define `Sublattice`. -/
structure IsSublattice (s : Set α) : Prop where
supClosed : SupClosed s
infClosed : InfClosed s
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_empty : IsSublattice (∅ : Set α) := ⟨supClosed_empty, infClosed_empty⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_singleton : IsSublattice ({a} : Set α) :=
⟨supClosed_singleton, infClosed_singleton⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_univ : IsSublattice (Set.univ : Set α) :=
⟨supClosed_univ, infClosed_univ⟩
lemma IsSublattice.inter (hs : IsSublattice s) (ht : IsSublattice t) : IsSublattice (s ∩ t) :=
⟨hs.1.inter ht.1, hs.2.inter ht.2⟩
lemma isSublattice_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsSublattice s) : IsSublattice (⋂₀ S) :=
⟨supClosed_sInter fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).1, infClosed_sInter fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).2⟩
lemma isSublattice_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsSublattice (f i)) : IsSublattice (⋂ i, f i) :=
⟨supClosed_iInter fun _i ↦ (hf _).1, infClosed_iInter fun _i ↦ (hf _).2⟩
lemma IsSublattice.preimage [FunLike F β α] [LatticeHomClass F β α]
(hs : IsSublattice s) (f : F) :
IsSublattice (f ⁻¹' s) := ⟨hs.1.preimage _, hs.2.preimage _⟩
lemma IsSublattice.image [FunLike F α β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] (hs : IsSublattice s) (f : F) :
IsSublattice (f '' s) := ⟨hs.1.image _, hs.2.image _⟩
lemma IsSublattice_range [FunLike F α β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
IsSublattice (Set.range f) :=
⟨supClosed_range _, infClosed_range _⟩
lemma IsSublattice.prod {t : Set β} (hs : IsSublattice s) (ht : IsSublattice t) :
IsSublattice (s ×ˢ t) := ⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
lemma isSublattice_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Lattice (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, IsSublattice (t i)) : IsSublattice (s.pi t) :=
⟨supClosed_pi fun _i hi ↦ (ht _ hi).1, infClosed_pi fun _i hi ↦ (ht _ hi).2⟩
@[simp] lemma supClosed_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
SupClosed (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ InfClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma infClosed_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
InfClosed (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ SupClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma supClosed_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} :
SupClosed (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ InfClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma infClosed_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} :
InfClosed (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ SupClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
IsSublattice (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsSublattice s := ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_preimage_ofDual :
IsSublattice (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsSublattice s := ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩⟩
alias ⟨_, InfClosed.dual⟩ := supClosed_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, SupClosed.dual⟩ := infClosed_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsSublattice.dual⟩ := isSublattice_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsSublattice.of_dual⟩ := isSublattice_preimage_toDual
end Lattice
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.supClosed (s : Set α) : SupClosed s :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by cases le_total a b <;> simp [*]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.infClosed (s : Set α) : InfClosed s :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by cases le_total a b <;> simp [*]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.isSublattice (s : Set α) : IsSublattice s :=
⟨LinearOrder.supClosed _, LinearOrder.infClosed _⟩
end LinearOrder
/-! ## Closure -/
open Finset
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- Every set in a join-semilattice generates a set closed under join. -/
@[simps! isClosed]
def supClosure : ClosureOperator (Set α) := .ofPred
(fun s ↦ {a | ∃ (t : Finset α) (ht : t.Nonempty), ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.sup' ht id = a})
SupClosed
(fun s a ha ↦ ⟨{a}, singleton_nonempty _, by simpa⟩)
(by
classical
rintro s _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩ _ ⟨u, hu, hus, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ht.mono subset_union_left, ?_, sup'_union ht hu _⟩
rw [coe_union]
exact Set.union_subset hts hus)
(by rintro s₁ s₂ hs h₂ _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩; exact h₂.finsetSup'_mem ht fun i hi ↦ hs <| hts hi)
@[simp] lemma subset_supClosure {s : Set α} : s ⊆ supClosure s := supClosure.le_closure _
@[simp] lemma supClosed_supClosure : SupClosed (supClosure s) := supClosure.isClosed_closure _
lemma supClosure_mono : Monotone (supClosure : Set α → Set α) := supClosure.monotone
@[simp] lemma supClosure_eq_self : supClosure s = s ↔ SupClosed s := supClosure.isClosed_iff.symm
alias ⟨_, SupClosed.supClosure_eq⟩ := supClosure_eq_self
lemma supClosure_idem (s : Set α) : supClosure (supClosure s) = supClosure s :=
supClosure.idempotent _
@[simp] lemma supClosure_empty : supClosure (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp] lemma supClosure_singleton : supClosure {a} = {a} := by simp
@[simp] lemma supClosure_univ : supClosure (Set.univ : Set α) = Set.univ := by simp
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_supClosure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (supClosure s) = upperBounds s :=
(upperBounds_mono_set subset_supClosure).antisymm <| by
rintro a ha _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
exact sup'_le _ _ fun b hb ↦ ha <| hts hb
@[simp] lemma isLUB_supClosure : IsLUB (supClosure s) a ↔ IsLUB s a := by simp [IsLUB]
lemma sup_mem_supClosure (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a ⊔ b ∈ supClosure s :=
supClosed_supClosure (subset_supClosure ha) (subset_supClosure hb)
lemma finsetSup'_mem_supClosure {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} (ht : t.Nonempty) {f : ι → α}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) : t.sup' ht f ∈ supClosure s :=
supClosed_supClosure.finsetSup'_mem _ fun _i hi ↦ subset_supClosure <| hf _ hi
lemma supClosure_min : s ⊆ t → SupClosed t → supClosure s ⊆ t := supClosure.closure_min
/-- The semilatice generated by a finite set is finite. -/
protected lemma Set.Finite.supClosure (hs : s.Finite) : (supClosure s).Finite := by
lift s to Finset α using hs
classical
refine ({t ∈ s.powerset | t.Nonempty}.attach.image
fun t ↦ t.1.sup' (mem_filter.1 t.2).2 id).finite_toSet.subset ?_
rintro _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
simp only [id_eq, coe_image, mem_image, mem_coe, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists,
Finset.mem_powerset, Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, mem_filter]
exact ⟨t, ⟨hts, ht⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma supClosure_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
supClosure (s ×ˢ t) = supClosure s ×ˢ supClosure t :=
le_antisymm (supClosure_min (Set.prod_mono subset_supClosure subset_supClosure) <|
supClosed_supClosure.prod supClosed_supClosure) <| by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨⟨u, hu, hus, rfl⟩, v, hv, hvt, rfl⟩
refine ⟨u ×ˢ v, hu.product hv, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa only [coe_product] using Set.prod_mono hus hvt
· simp [prodMk_sup'_sup']
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- Every set in a join-semilattice generates a set closed under join. -/
| @[simps! isClosed]
def infClosure : ClosureOperator (Set α) := ClosureOperator.ofPred
(fun s ↦ {a | ∃ (t : Finset α) (ht : t.Nonempty), ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.inf' ht id = a})
InfClosed
| Mathlib/Order/SupClosed.lean | 354 | 357 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp] lemma empty_diffs : ∅ \\ t = ∅ := image₂_empty_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_empty : s \\ ∅ = ∅ := image₂_empty_right
@[simp] lemma diffs_eq_empty : s \\ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_diffs : {a} \\ t = t.image (a \ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_singleton : s \\ {b} = s.image (· \ b) := image₂_singleton_right
lemma singleton_diffs_singleton : ({a} \\ {b} : Finset α) = {a \ b} := image₂_singleton
lemma diffs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \\ t = s₁ \\ t ∪ s₂ \\ t := image₂_union_left
lemma diffs_union_right : s \\ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \\ t₁ ∪ s \\ t₂ := image₂_union_right
lemma diffs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) \\ t ⊆ s₁ \\ t ∩ s₂ \\ t := image₂_inter_subset_left
lemma diffs_inter_subset_right : s \\ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s \\ t₁ ∩ s \\ t₂ := image₂_inter_subset_right
lemma subset_diffs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' \\ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a \ ·)) = s \\ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· \ b)) = s \\ t :=
biUnion_image_right
lemma image_sdiff_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· \ ·)) = s \\ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
lemma diffs_right_comm : s \\ t \\ u = s \\ u \\ t := image₂_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
end Diffs
section Compls
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t : Finset α)
/-- `sᶜˢ` is the finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`. -/
def compls : Finset α → Finset α := map ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] postfix:max "ᶜˢ" => Finset.compls
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_compls : a ∈ sᶜˢ ↔ aᶜ ∈ s := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mem_map' ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩, Embedding.coeFn_mk, compl_compl, compls]
variable (s t)
@[simp] lemma image_compl [DecidableEq α] : s.image compl = sᶜˢ := by simp [compls, map_eq_image]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compls : (↑sᶜˢ : Set α) = compl '' ↑s := coe_map _ _
@[simp] lemma card_compls : #sᶜˢ = #s := card_map _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t}
lemma compl_mem_compls : a ∈ s → aᶜ ∈ sᶜˢ := mem_map_of_mem _
@[simp] lemma compls_subset_compls : s₁ᶜˢ ⊆ s₂ᶜˢ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := map_subset_map
lemma forall_mem_compls {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := forall_mem_map
lemma exists_compls_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_compls (s : Finset α) : sᶜˢᶜˢ = s := by ext; simp
lemma compls_subset_iff : sᶜˢ ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ tᶜˢ := by rw [← compls_subset_compls, compls_compls]
@[simp]
lemma compls_nonempty : sᶜˢ.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := map_nonempty
protected alias ⟨Nonempty.of_compls, Nonempty.compls⟩ := compls_nonempty
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])] Nonempty.compls
@[simp] lemma compls_empty : (∅ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = ∅ := map_empty _
@[simp] lemma compls_eq_empty : sᶜˢ = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := map_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma compls_singleton (a : α) : {a}ᶜˢ = {aᶜ} := map_singleton _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = univ := by ext; simp
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] lemma compls_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∪ tᶜˢ := map_union _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∩ tᶜˢ := map_inter _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_infs (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊼ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊻ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_inf
@[simp] lemma compls_sups (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊻ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊼ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_sup
@[simp] lemma infs_compls_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : s ⊼ tᶜˢ = s \\ t := by
ext; simp [sdiff_eq]; aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_infs_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : sᶜˢ ⊼ t = t \\ s := by
rw [infs_comm, infs_compls_eq_diffs]
@[simp] lemma diffs_compls_eq_infs (s t : Finset α) : s \\ tᶜˢ = s ⊼ t := by
rw [← infs_compls_eq_diffs, compls_compls]
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {n : ℕ}
protected lemma _root_.Set.Sized.compls (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized n) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) :=
Finset.forall_mem_compls.2 <| fun s hs ↦ by rw [Finset.card_compl, h𝒜 hs]
lemma sized_compls (hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized n ↔ (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) where
mp h𝒜 := by simpa using h𝒜.compls
mpr h𝒜 := by simpa only [Nat.sub_sub_self hn] using h𝒜.compls
end Compls
end Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 753 | 754 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Vincent Beffara. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Vincent Beffara, Stefan Kebekus
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.DSlope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Uniqueness
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.EventuallyConst
import Mathlib.Topology.Perfect
/-!
# Principle of isolated zeros
This file proves the fact that the zeros of a non-constant analytic function of one variable are
isolated. It also introduces a little bit of API in the `HasFPowerSeriesAt` namespace that is useful
in this setup.
## Main results
* `AnalyticAt.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero` is the main statement that if a function is
analytic at `z₀`, then either it is identically zero in a neighborhood of `z₀`, or it does not
vanish in a punctured neighborhood of `z₀`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd.eqOn_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq` is the identity theorem for analytic
functions: if a function `f` is analytic on a connected set `U` and is zero on a set with an
accumulation point in `U` then `f` is identically `0` on `U`.
## Applications
* Vanishing of products of analytic functions, `eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero`: If `f, g` are
analytic on a neighbourhood of the preconnected open set `U`, and `f • g = 0` on `U`, then either
`f = 0` on `U` or `g = 0` on `U`.
* Preimages of codiscrete sets, `AnalyticOnNhd.preimage_mem_codiscreteWithin`: if `f` is analytic
on a neighbourhood of `U` and not locally constant, then the preimage of any subset codiscrete
within `f '' U` is codiscrete within `U`.
-/
open Filter Function Nat FormalMultilinearSeries EMetric Set
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {s : E} {p q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 𝕜 E} {f g : 𝕜 → E} {n : ℕ} {z z₀ : 𝕜}
namespace HasSum
variable {a : ℕ → E}
theorem hasSum_at_zero (a : ℕ → E) : HasSum (fun n => (0 : 𝕜) ^ n • a n) (a 0) := by
convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 fun b h ↦ _ <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_hasSum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero (hs : HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a m) s)
(ha : ∀ k < n, a k = 0) : ∃ t : E, z ^ n • t = s ∧ HasSum (fun m => z ^ m • a (m + n)) t := by
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· simpa
by_cases h : z = 0
· have : s = 0 := hs.unique (by simpa [ha 0 hn, h] using hasSum_at_zero a)
exact ⟨a n, by simp [h, hn.ne', this], by simpa [h] using hasSum_at_zero fun m => a (m + n)⟩
· refine ⟨(z ^ n)⁻¹ • s, by field_simp [smul_smul], ?_⟩
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, z ^ i • a i = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun k hk => by simp [ha k (Finset.mem_range.mp hk)]
have h2 : HasSum (fun m => z ^ (m + n) • a (m + n)) s := by
simpa [h1] using (hasSum_nat_add_iff' n).mpr hs
convert h2.const_smul (z⁻¹ ^ n) using 1
· field_simp [pow_add, smul_smul]
· simp only [inv_pow]
end HasSum
namespace HasFPowerSeriesAt
theorem has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt (dslope f z₀) p.fslope z₀ := by
have hpd : deriv f z₀ = p.coeff 1 := hp.deriv
have hp0 : p.coeff 0 = f z₀ := hp.coeff_zero 1
simp only [hasFPowerSeriesAt_iff, apply_eq_pow_smul_coeff, coeff_fslope] at hp ⊢
refine hp.mono fun x hx => ?_
by_cases h : x = 0
· convert hasSum_single (α := E) 0 _ <;> intros <;> simp [*]
· have hxx : ∀ n : ℕ, x⁻¹ * x ^ (n + 1) = x ^ n := fun n => by field_simp [h, _root_.pow_succ]
suffices HasSum (fun n => x⁻¹ • x ^ (n + 1) • p.coeff (n + 1)) (x⁻¹ • (f (z₀ + x) - f z₀)) by
| simpa [dslope, slope, h, smul_smul, hxx] using this
simpa [hp0] using ((hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr hx).const_smul x⁻¹
theorem has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope (n : ℕ) (hp : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p z₀) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt ((swap dslope z₀)^[n] f) (fslope^[n] p) z₀ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/IsolatedZeros.lean | 83 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
end equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
theorem mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal := mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage (hf : MapsTo f s t) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := hf
theorem mapsTo_iff_subset_preimage : MapsTo f s t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn => simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
lemma MapsTo.insert (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : α) : MapsTo f (insert x s) (insert (f x) t) := by
simpa [← singleton_union] using h.mono_right subset_union_right
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
end MapsTo
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
lemma InjOn.of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn f s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq ↦ h hx hy (by simp [heq])
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s ↔ InjOn g (f '' s) :=
⟨image_of_comp, fun h ↦ InjOn.comp h hf <| mapsTo_image f s⟩
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
theorem _root_.Set.InjOn.injective_iff (s : Set β) (h : InjOn g s) (hs : range f ⊆ s) :
Injective (g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨(·.of_comp), fun h _ ↦ by aesop⟩
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun _ hs _ ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (hB hs) (hB ht)).1 hst
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
| rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 360 | 363 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ` -/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit` -/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")]
alias nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse := nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
lemma inv_mulVec_eq_vec {A : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A]
{u v : n → α} (hM : u = A.mulVec v) : A⁻¹.mulVec u = v := by
rw [hM, Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible, Matrix.one_mulVec]
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse
[DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse
[DecidableEq m] [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable [DecidableEq m] {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.row ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← col_transpose, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.col ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← row_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit, isUnit_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.row :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.col :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ringInverse]
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹ ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_isUnit_det, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with ht | ht
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rcases (Fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc | hc
· rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc
haveI := hc
ext i
exact (IsEmpty.false i).elim
· have hn : Nonempty n := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ ?_
simp [hn]
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.one, Matrix.inv with inv_one := inv_eq_left_inv (by simp) }
theorem inv_smul (k : α) [Invertible k] (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟ k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_smul' (k : αˣ) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A := by
refine inv_eq_left_inv ?_
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, Units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.val_inv_mul, one_smul]
section Diagonal
/-- `diagonal v` is invertible if `v` is -/
def diagonalInvertible {α} [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] :
Invertible (diagonal v) :=
Invertible.map (diagonalRingHom n α) v
theorem invOf_diagonal_eq {α} [Semiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] [Invertible (diagonal v)] :
⅟ (diagonal v) = diagonal (⅟ v) := by
rw [@Invertible.congr _ _ _ _ _ (diagonalInvertible v) rfl]
rfl
/-- `v` is invertible if `diagonal v` is -/
def invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible (v : n → α) [Invertible (diagonal v)] : Invertible v where
invOf := diag (⅟ (diagonal v))
invOf_mul_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_assoc, prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
mul_invOf_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_prod_erase _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
/-- Together `Matrix.diagonalInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible (v : n → α) : Invertible (diagonal v) ≃ Invertible v where
toFun := @invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
invFun := @diagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_diagonal {v : n → α} : IsUnit (diagonal v) ↔ IsUnit v := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible v).nonempty_congr]
theorem inv_diagonal (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)⁻¹ = diagonal (Ring.inverse v) := by
rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse]
by_cases h : IsUnit v
· have := isUnit_diagonal.mpr h
cases this.nonempty_invertible
cases h.nonempty_invertible
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_diagonal_eq]
· have := isUnit_diagonal.not.mpr h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Pi.zero_def, diagonal_zero, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this]
end Diagonal
/-- The inverse of a 1×1 or 0×0 matrix is always diagonal.
While we could write this as `of fun _ _ => Ring.inverse (A default default)` on the RHS, this is
less useful because:
* It wouldn't work for 0×0 matrices.
* More things are true about diagonal matrices than constant matrices, and so more lemmas exist.
`Matrix.diagonal_unique` can be used to reach this form, while `Ring.inverse_eq_inv` can be used
to replace `Ring.inverse` with `⁻¹`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem inv_subsingleton [Subsingleton m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix m m α) :
A⁻¹ = diagonal fun i => Ring.inverse (A i i) := by
rw [inv_def, adjugate_subsingleton, smul_one_eq_diagonal]
congr! with i
exact det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
section Woodbury
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (U : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix m m α) (V : Matrix m n α)
/-- The **Woodbury Identity** (`⁻¹` version). -/
theorem add_mul_mul_inv_eq_sub (hA : IsUnit A) (hC : IsUnit C) (hAC : IsUnit (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)) :
(A + U * C * V)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ - A⁻¹ * U * (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)⁻¹ * V * A⁻¹ := by
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hA.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hC.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨iAC⟩ := hAC.nonempty_invertible
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv] at iAC
letI := invertibleAddMulMul A U C V
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
apply invOf_add_mul_mul
end Woodbury
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_inv (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹⁻¹⁻¹ = A⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· rw [nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv _ h]
· simp [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_add_inv'` -/
theorem inv_add_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ + B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (A + B) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_add_inverse h
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_sub_inv'` -/
theorem inv_sub_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ - B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (B - A) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_sub_inverse h
theorem mul_inv_rev (A B : Matrix n n α) : (A * B)⁻¹ = B⁻¹ * A⁻¹ := by
simp only [inv_def]
rw [Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul, smul_smul, det_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib,
Ring.mul_inverse_rev]
/-- A version of `List.prod_inv_reverse` for `Matrix.inv`. -/
theorem list_prod_inv_reverse : ∀ l : List (Matrix n n α), l.prod⁻¹ = (l.reverse.map Inv.inv).prod
| [] => by rw [List.reverse_nil, List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, inv_one]
| A::Xs => by
rw [List.reverse_cons', List.map_concat, List.prod_concat, List.prod_cons,
mul_inv_rev, list_prod_inv_reverse Xs]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • A⁻¹ *ᵥ b = cramer A b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, A.nonsing_inv_apply h, ← smul_mulVec_assoc, smul_smul,
h.mul_val_inv, one_smul]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_vecMul_eq_cramer_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • b ᵥ* A⁻¹ = cramer Aᵀ b := by
rw [← A⁻¹.transpose_transpose, vecMul_transpose, transpose_nonsing_inv, ← det_transpose,
Aᵀ.det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer _ (isUnit_det_transpose A h)]
/-! ### Inverses of permutated matrices
Note that the simp-normal form of `Matrix.reindex` is `Matrix.submatrix`, so we prove most of these
results about only the latter.
-/
section Submatrix
variable [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is invertible if `A` is -/
def submatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ A).submatrix e₂ e₁) <| by
rw [Matrix.submatrix_mul_equiv, mul_invOf_self, submatrix_one_equiv]
| /-- `A` is invertible if `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is -/
def invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m)
[Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)] : Invertible A :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)).submatrix e₂.symm e₁.symm) <| by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 666 | 669 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Function TopologicalSpace Topology Set UniformSpace Uniformity
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
theorem cauchy_map_iff' {l : Filter β} [hl : NeBot l] {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans <| and_iff_right hl
theorem Cauchy.mono {f g : Filter α} [hg : NeBot g] (h_c : Cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (Filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
theorem Cauchy.mono' {f g : Filter α} (h_c : Cauchy f) (_ : NeBot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
theorem cauchy_nhds {a : α} : Cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_neBot, nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)⟩
theorem cauchy_pure {a : α} : Cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchy_map {l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma Cauchy.mono_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} (huv : u ≤ v)
(hF : Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F) : Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F :=
⟨hF.1, hF.2.trans huv⟩
lemma cauchy_inf_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u ⊓ v) F ↔
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F ∧ Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [inf_uniformity (u := u), le_inf_iff, and_and_left]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff, forall_and, forall_const]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace' {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
simp_rw [cauchy_iff_le (uniformSpace := _), iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff]
lemma cauchy_comap_uniformSpace {u : UniformSpace β} {α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := comap f u) l ↔ Cauchy (map f l) := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap]
rfl
lemma cauchy_prod_iff [UniformSpace β] {F : Filter (α × β)} :
Cauchy F ↔ Cauchy (map Prod.fst F) ∧ Cauchy (map Prod.snd F) := by
simp_rw [instUniformSpaceProd, ← cauchy_comap_uniformSpace, ← cauchy_inf_uniformSpace]
theorem Cauchy.prod [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} (hf : Cauchy f) (hg : Cauchy g) :
Cauchy (f ×ˢ g) := by
have := hf.1; have := hg.1
simpa [cauchy_prod_iff, hf.1] using ⟨hf, hg⟩
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`SequentiallyComplete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : Filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
intro s hs
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩
apply mem_of_superset t_mem
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact fun z hz => hU (prodMk_mem_compRel hxy (ht <| mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) (adhs : ClusterPt x f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s := (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs
use t, t_mem, ht
exact forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem))
theorem le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ClusterPt x f :=
⟨fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.map [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : UniformContinuous m) : Cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc
map m f ×ˢ map m f = map (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := Filter.prod_map_map_eq
_ ≤ Filter.map (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 α) := map_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := hm⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.comap [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) [NeBot (comap m f)] :
Cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc
comap m f ×ˢ comap m f = comap (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := prod_comap_comap_eq
_ ≤ comap (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 β) := comap_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 α := hm⟩
theorem Cauchy.comap' [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : Filter.comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(_ : NeBot (Filter.comap m f)) : Cauchy (Filter.comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def CauchySeq [Preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
Cauchy (atTop.map u)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_uniformity [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) := by
simpa only [Tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using h.right
theorem CauchySeq.nonempty [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : Nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_neBot _ _ <| (map_neBot_iff _).1 hu.1
theorem CauchySeq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V := by
haveI := h.nonempty
have := h.tendsto_uniformity; rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at this
simpa [MapsTo] using atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchySeq [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) : CauchySeq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
theorem cauchySeq_const [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (x : α) : CauchySeq fun _ : β => x :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchySeq
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans <| by simp only [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
theorem CauchySeq.comp_tendsto {γ} [Preorder β] [SemilatticeSup γ] [Nonempty γ] {f : β → α}
(hf : CauchySeq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) : CauchySeq (f ∘ g) :=
⟨inferInstance, le_trans (prod_le_prod.mpr ⟨Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg, Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg⟩) hf.2⟩
theorem CauchySeq.comp_injective [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] [Nonempty β] {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f : β → ℕ} (hf : Injective f) : CauchySeq (u ∘ f) :=
hu.comp_tendsto <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hf.tendsto_cofinite.mono_left atTop_le_cofinite
theorem Function.Bijective.cauchySeq_comp_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Bijective f) (u : ℕ → α) :
CauchySeq (u ∘ f) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp_injective hf.injective⟩
lift f to ℕ ≃ ℕ using hf
simpa only [Function.comp_def, f.apply_symm_apply] using H.comp_injective f.symm.injective
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto] at hu
exact ((hu.comp <| hf.prod_atTop hg).comp tendsto_atTop_diagonal).subseq_mem hV
-- todo: generalize this and other lemmas to a nonempty semilattice
theorem cauchySeq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, k ∈ Prod.map u u ⁻¹' V :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto
theorem cauchySeq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V := by
simp only [cauchySeq_iff', Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self', mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
theorem CauchySeq.prodMap {γ δ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq (Prod.map u v) := by
simpa only [CauchySeq, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using hu.prod hv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod_map := CauchySeq.prodMap
theorem CauchySeq.prodMk {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {u : γ → α} {v : γ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq fun x => (u x, v x) :=
haveI := hu.1.of_map
(Cauchy.prod hu hv).mono (tendsto_map.prodMk tendsto_map)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod := CauchySeq.prodMk
theorem CauchySeq.eventually_eventually [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, (u k, u l) ∈ V :=
eventually_atTop_curry <| hu.tendsto_uniformity hV
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_cauchySeq {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) {u : γ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : CauchySeq (f ∘ u) :=
hu.map hf
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V n := by
have : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ k, (u l, u k) ∈ V n := fun n => by
rw [cauchySeq_iff] at hu
rcases hu _ (hV n) with ⟨N, H⟩
exact ⟨N, fun k hk l hl => H _ (le_trans hk hl) _ hk⟩
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : StrictMono φ, hφ : ∀ n, ∀ l ≥ φ n, (u l, u <| φ n) ∈ V n⟩ :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually' this
exact ⟨φ, φ_extr, fun n => hφ _ _ (φ_extr <| Nat.lt_add_one n).le⟩
theorem Filter.Tendsto.subseq_mem_entourage {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
{a : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ (u (φ 0), a) ∈ V 0 ∧
∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V (n + 1) := by
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 (hu (ball_mem_nhds a (symm_le_uniformity <| hV 0))) with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases (hu.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat n)).cauchySeq.subseq_mem fun n => hV (n + 1) with
⟨φ, φ_mono, hφV⟩
exact ⟨fun k => φ k + n, φ_mono.add_const _, hn _ le_add_self, hφV⟩
/-- If a Cauchy sequence has a convergent subsequence, then it converges. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {p : Filter ι} [NeBot p] (hf : Tendsto f p atTop) {a : α}
(ha : Tendsto (u ∘ f) p (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hu (ha.mapClusterPt.of_comp hf)
/-- Any shift of a Cauchy sequence is also a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_shift {u : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : CauchySeq (fun n ↦ u (n + k)) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [cauchySeq_iff] at h ⊢
intro V mV
obtain ⟨N, h⟩ := h V mV
use N + k
intro a ha b hb
convert h (a - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le ha) (b - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le hb) <;> omega
· exact h.comp_tendsto (tendsto_add_atTop_nat k)
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {p : γ → Prop}
{s : γ → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ s i := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, ← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
refine (atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_iff h).trans ?_
simp only [exists_prop, true_and, MapsTo, preimage, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_Ici, and_imp, Prod.map, @forall_swap (_ ≤ _) β]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff' {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → Set (α × α)} (H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, (u n, u N) ∈ s i := by
refine H.cauchySeq_iff.trans ⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· exact (h i hi).imp fun N hN n hn => hN n hn N le_rfl
· rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity (H.mem_of_mem hi) with ⟨t, ht, ht', hts⟩
rcases H.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨j, hj, hjt⟩
refine (h j hj).imp fun N hN m hm n hn => hts ⟨u N, hjt ?_, ht' <| hjt ?_⟩
exacts [hN m hm, hN n hn]
theorem cauchySeq_of_controlled [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (U : β → Set (α × α))
(hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) {f : β → α}
(hf : ∀ ⦃N m n : β⦄, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto.2
(by
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets]
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hU s hs
refine ⟨(N, N), fun mn hmn => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, n⟩ := mn
exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2))
theorem isComplete_iff_clusterPt {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l, Cauchy l → l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l :=
forall₃_congr fun _ hl _ => exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ =>
le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy hl
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ↑l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine ⟨fun h l => h l, fun H => isComplete_iff_clusterPt.2 fun l hl hls => ?_⟩
haveI := hl.1
rcases H (Ultrafilter.of l) hl.ultrafilter_of ((Ultrafilter.of_le l).trans hls) with ⟨x, hxs, hxl⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, (ClusterPt.of_le_nhds hxl).mono (Ultrafilter.of_le l)⟩
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter' {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → s ∈ l → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
isComplete_iff_ultrafilter.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
protected theorem IsComplete.union {s t : Set α} (hs : IsComplete s) (ht : IsComplete t) :
IsComplete (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [isComplete_iff_ultrafilter', Ultrafilter.union_mem_iff, or_imp] at *
exact fun l hl =>
⟨fun hsl => (hs l hl hsl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inl hx.1, hx.2⟩, fun htl =>
(ht l hl htl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inr hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩
theorem isComplete_iUnion_separated {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, IsComplete (s i))
{U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) (hd : ∀ (i j : ι), ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s j, (x, y) ∈ U → i = j) :
IsComplete (⋃ i, s i) := by
set S := ⋃ i, s i
intro l hl hls
rw [le_principal_iff] at hls
obtain ⟨hl_ne, hl'⟩ := cauchy_iff.1 hl
obtain ⟨t, htS, htl, htU⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ S ∧ t ∈ l ∧ t ×ˢ t ⊆ U := by
rcases hl' U hU with ⟨t, htl, htU⟩
refine ⟨t ∩ S, inter_subset_right, inter_mem htl hls, Subset.trans ?_ htU⟩
gcongr <;> apply inter_subset_left
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, t ⊆ s i := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem htl with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hx) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, fun y hy => ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hy) with ⟨j, hj⟩
rwa [hd i j x hi y hj (htU <| mk_mem_prod hx hy)]
rcases hs i l hl (le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_of_superset htl hi) with ⟨x, hxs, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hxs⟩, hlx⟩
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class CompleteSpace (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Prop where
/-- In a complete uniform space, every Cauchy filter converges. -/
complete : ∀ {f : Filter α}, Cauchy f → ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem complete_univ {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompleteSpace α] :
IsComplete (univ : Set α) := fun f hf _ => by
rcases CompleteSpace.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_univ x, hx⟩
instance CompleteSpace.prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace α] [CompleteSpace β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_fst
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_snd
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod]; constructor <;> assumption⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.fst_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace α where
complete hf :=
let ⟨y⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.prod <| cauchy_pure (a := y)
⟨a, by simpa only [map_fst_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.fst) hab⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.snd_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty α] :
CompleteSpace β where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| (cauchy_pure (a := x)).prod hf
⟨b, by simpa only [map_snd_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.snd) hab⟩
lemma completeSpace_prod_of_nonempty [UniformSpace β] [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) ↔ CompleteSpace α ∧ CompleteSpace β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨.fst_of_prod (β := β), .snd_of_prod (α := α)⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ .prod⟩
@[to_additive]
instance CompleteSpace.mulOpposite [CompleteSpace α] : CompleteSpace αᵐᵒᵖ where
complete hf :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.exists.mpr <|
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete (hf.map MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop)
⟨x, (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hx).trans_eq <| MulOpposite.comap_unop_nhds _⟩
/-- If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
theorem completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ (h : IsComplete (univ : Set α)) : CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h _ hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top); ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ : CompleteSpace α ↔ IsComplete (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@complete_univ α _, completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_ultrafilter :
CompleteSpace α ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ∃ x : α, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, isComplete_iff_ultrafilter]
theorem cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∃ x, l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨CompleteSpace.complete, fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => cauchy_nhds.mono hx⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ ∃ x, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds
/-- A Cauchy sequence in a complete space converges -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete [Preorder β] [CompleteSpace α] {u : β → α}
(H : CauchySeq u) : ∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) :=
CompleteSpace.complete H
/-- If `K` is a complete subset, then any cauchy sequence in `K` converges to a point in `K` -/
theorem cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete [Preorder β] {K : Set α} (h₁ : IsComplete K)
{u : β → α} (h₂ : ∀ n, u n ∈ K) (h₃ : CauchySeq u) : ∃ v ∈ K, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 v) :=
| h₁ _ h₃ <| le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_map_iff_exists_image.2
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [image_univ, range_subset_iff]⟩
theorem Cauchy.le_nhds_lim [CompleteSpace α] {f : Filter α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
haveI := hf.1.nonempty; f ≤ 𝓝 (lim f) :=
_root_.le_nhds_lim (CompleteSpace.complete hf)
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 429 | 434 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.Isometry
/-!
# Angles between points
This file defines unoriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.angle`, with notation `∠`, is the undirected angle determined by three
points.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ : P}
/-- The undirected angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and
`p₃`. If either of those points equals `p₂`, this is π/2. Use
`open scoped EuclideanGeometry` to access the `∠ p₁ p₂ p₃`
notation. -/
nonrec def angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp (by fun_prop)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- The angle at a point does not depend on the order of the other two
points. -/
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ :=
angle_comm _ _
/-- The angle at a point is nonnegative. -/
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
angle_nonneg _ _
/-- The angle at a point is at most π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
/-- The angle ∠AAB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
/-- The angle ∠ABB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
/-- The angle ∠ABA at a point is `0`, unless `A = B`. -/
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self <| vsub_ne_zero.2 h
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BAC is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp₁p₂, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
| rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp₁p₂
use hp₁p₂, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 145 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Extra lemmas about permutations
This file proves miscellaneous lemmas about `Equiv.Perm`.
## TODO
Most of the content of this file was moved to `Algebra.Group.End` in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/22141.
It would be good to merge the remaining lemmas with other files, eg `GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding`
looks like it could benefit from such a treatment (splitting into the algebra and non-algebra parts)
-/
universe u v
namespace Equiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Perm
@[simp] lemma image_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ '' s = f ⁻¹' s := f⁻¹.image_eq_preimage _
@[simp] lemma preimage_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ ⁻¹' s = f '' s :=
(f.image_eq_preimage _).symm
end Perm
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem swap_smul_self_smul [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) (x : β) :
swap i j • swap i j • x = x := by simp [smul_smul]
theorem swap_smul_involutive [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) :
Function.Involutive (swap i j • · : β → β) := swap_smul_self_smul i j
end Swap
end Equiv
open Equiv Function
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} {f : Perm α} {s : Set α}
lemma BijOn.perm_inv (hf : BijOn f s s) : BijOn ↑(f⁻¹) s s := hf.symm f.invOn
lemma MapsTo.perm_pow : MapsTo f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, MapsTo (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact MapsTo.iterate
lemma SurjOn.perm_pow : SurjOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, SurjOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact SurjOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_pow : BijOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact BijOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_zpow (hf : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n : ℤ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s
| Int.ofNat n => hf.perm_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => (hf.perm_pow (n + 1)).perm_inv
end Set
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Basic.lean | 708 | 709 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Hom
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.Proper.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we specialize various facts about Lipschitz continuous maps
to the case of (pseudo) metric spaces.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis Ideal
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} : LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzOnWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul
namespace LipschitzWith
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace γ] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
{x y : α} {r : ℝ}
protected theorem of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
of_dist_le_mul fun x y =>
le_trans (h x y) <| by gcongr; apply Real.le_coe_toNNReal
protected theorem mk_one (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
of_dist_le_mul <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
have I : ∀ x y, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y := fun x y => sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x y)
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x y, dist_comm y x ▸ I y x⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith K f := by simpa only [Real.toNNReal_coe] using LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected theorem of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul 1 <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected theorem le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_trans (le_abs_self _) <| h.dist_le_mul x y
protected theorem iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨LipschitzWith.le_add_mul, LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul K⟩
theorem nndist_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : nndist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * nndist x y :=
hf.dist_le_mul x y
theorem dist_le_mul_of_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hr : dist x y ≤ r) : dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans <| by gcongr
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_le_mul_of_le hy
theorem dist_lt_mul_of_lt (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : dist x y < r) :
dist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans_lt <| (mul_lt_mul_left <| NNReal.coe_pos.2 hK.bot_lt).2 hr
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
/-- A Lipschitz continuous map is a locally bounded map. -/
def toLocallyBoundedMap (f : α → β) (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : LocallyBoundedMap α β :=
LocallyBoundedMap.ofMapBounded f fun _s hs =>
let ⟨C, hC⟩ := Metric.isBounded_iff.1 hs
Metric.isBounded_iff.2 ⟨K * C, forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx => forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_le_mul_of_le (hC hx hy)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLocallyBoundedMap (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : ⇑(hf.toLocallyBoundedMap f) = f :=
rfl
theorem comap_cobounded_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
comap f (Bornology.cobounded β) ≤ Bornology.cobounded α :=
(hf.toLocallyBoundedMap f).2
/-- The image of a bounded set under a Lipschitz map is bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_image (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsBounded s) :
IsBounded (f '' s) :=
hs.image (toLocallyBoundedMap f hf)
theorem diam_image_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) (hs : IsBounded s) :
Metric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * Metric.diam s :=
Metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg K.coe_nonneg Metric.diam_nonneg) <|
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx =>
forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy => hf.dist_le_mul_of_le <| Metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem hs hx hy
protected theorem dist_left (y : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (dist · y) :=
LipschitzWith.mk_one fun _ _ => dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _
protected theorem dist_right (x : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (dist x) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => dist_triangle_right _ _ _
protected theorem dist : LipschitzWith 2 (Function.uncurry <| @dist α _) := by
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two]
exact LipschitzWith.uncurry LipschitzWith.dist_left LipschitzWith.dist_right
theorem dist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x n) :
dist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ dist x (f x) * (K : ℝ) ^ n := by
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm]
simpa only [NNReal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n).dist_le_mul x (f x)
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_max : LipschitzWith 1 fun p : ℝ × ℝ => max p.1 p.2 :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <|
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _)
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_min : LipschitzWith 1 fun p : ℝ × ℝ => min p.1 p.2 :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <|
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _)
lemma _root_.Real.lipschitzWith_toNNReal : LipschitzWith 1 Real.toNNReal := by
refine lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul.mpr (fun x y ↦ ?_)
simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, dist_prod_same_right, one_mul, Real.dist_eq] using
lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul.mp lipschitzWith_max (x, 0) (y, 0)
lemma cauchySeq_comp (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {u : ℕ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) :
CauchySeq (f ∘ u) := by
rcases cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hu with ⟨b, b_nonneg, hb, blim⟩
refine cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨fun n ↦ K * b n, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun n ↦ mul_nonneg (by positivity) (b_nonneg n)
· exact fun n m N hn hm ↦ hf.dist_le_mul_of_le (hb n m N hn hm)
· rw [← mul_zero (K : ℝ)]
exact blim.const_mul _
end Metric
section EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ} {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem max (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => max (f x) (g x) := by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), one_mul] using lipschitzWith_max.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
protected theorem min (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => min (f x) (g x) := by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), one_mul] using lipschitzWith_min.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem max_const (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => max (f x) a := by
simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.max (LipschitzWith.const a)
theorem const_max (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => max a (f x) := by
simpa only [max_comm] using hf.max_const a
theorem min_const (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => min (f x) a := by
simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.min (LipschitzWith.const a)
theorem const_min (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => min a (f x) := by
simpa only [min_comm] using hf.min_const a
end EMetric
protected theorem projIcc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : LipschitzWith 1 (projIcc a b h) :=
((LipschitzWith.id.const_min _).const_max _).subtype_mk _
end LipschitzWith
/-- The preimage of a proper space under a Lipschitz proper map is proper. -/
lemma LipschitzWith.properSpace {X Y : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
[PseudoMetricSpace Y] [ProperSpace Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsProperMap f)
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf' : LipschitzWith K f) : ProperSpace X :=
⟨fun x r ↦ (hf.isCompact_preimage (isCompact_closedBall (f x) (K * r))).of_isClosed_subset
Metric.isClosed_closedBall (hf'.mapsTo_closedBall x r).subset_preimage⟩
namespace Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
end Metric
namespace LipschitzOnWith
| section Metric
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 225 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
/-!
# Specific subobjects
We define `equalizerSubobject`, `kernelSubobject` and `imageSubobject`, which are the subobjects
represented by the equalizer, kernel and image of (a pair of) morphism(s) and provide conditions
for `P.factors f`, where `P` is one of these special subobjects.
TODO: Add conditions for when `P` is a pullback subobject.
TODO: an iff characterisation of `(imageSubobject f).Factors h`
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
/-- The equalizer of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
/-- The underlying object of `equalizerSubobject f g` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `equalizer f g`. -/
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp :
(equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ f = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ g := by
rw [← equalizerSubobject_arrow, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, equalizer.condition]
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h :=
⟨equalizer.lift h w, by simp⟩
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = h ≫ g :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp,
Category.assoc],
equalizerSubobject_factors f g h⟩
end Equalizer
section Kernel
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev kernelSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f)
/-- The underlying object of `kernelSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `kernel f`. -/
def kernelSubobjectIso : (kernelSubobject f : C) ≅ kernel f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (kernel.ι f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ kernel.ι f = (kernelSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow' :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = kernel.ι f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow_comp : (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [← kernelSubobject_arrow]
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.condition, comp_zero]
theorem kernelSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h :=
⟨kernel.lift _ h w, by simp⟩
theorem kernelSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = 0 :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp,
comp_zero],
kernelSubobject_factors f h⟩
/-- A factorisation of `h : W ⟶ X` through `kernelSubobject f`, assuming `h ≫ f = 0`. -/
def factorThruKernelSubobject {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernelSubobject f :=
(kernelSubobject f).factorThru h (kernelSubobject_factors f h w)
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_arrow {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = h := by
dsimp [factorThruKernelSubobject]
simp
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_kernelSubobjectIso {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso f).hom = kernel.lift f h w :=
(cancel_mono (kernel.ι f)).1 <| by simp
section
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} [HasKernel f']
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism between the kernel subobjects. -/
def kernelSubobjectMap (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobject f : C) ⟶ (kernelSubobject f' : C) :=
Subobject.factorThru _ ((kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left)
(kernelSubobject_factors _ _ (by simp [sq.w]))
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_arrow (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobject f').arrow = (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left := by
simp [kernelSubobjectMap]
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_id : kernelSubobjectMap (𝟙 (Arrow.mk f)) = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_comp {X'' Y'' : C} {f'' : X'' ⟶ Y''} [HasKernel f'']
(sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') (sq' : Arrow.mk f' ⟶ Arrow.mk f'') :
kernelSubobjectMap (sq ≫ sq') = kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq' := by
aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).inv =
(kernelSubobjectIso _).inv ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernelSubobjectIso_comp_kernel_map (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobjectIso _).hom ≫ kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm =
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).hom := by
simp [← Iso.comp_inv_eq, kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv]
end
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobject_zero {A B : C} : kernelSubobject (0 : A ⟶ B) = ⊤ :=
(isIso_iff_mk_eq_top _).mp (by infer_instance)
instance isIso_kernelSubobject_zero_arrow : IsIso (kernelSubobject (0 : X ⟶ Y)).arrow :=
(isIso_arrow_iff_eq_top _).mpr kernelSubobject_zero
theorem le_kernelSubobject (A : Subobject X) (h : A.arrow ≫ f = 0) : A ≤ kernelSubobject f :=
Subobject.le_mk_of_comm (kernel.lift f A.arrow h) (by simp)
/-- The isomorphism between the kernel of `f ≫ g` and the kernel of `g`,
when `f` is an isomorphism.
-/
def kernelSubobjectIsoComp {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobject (f ≫ g) : C) ≅ (kernelSubobject g : C) :=
kernelSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ kernelIsIsoComp f g ≪≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).symm
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectIsoComp_hom_arrow {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobjectIsoComp f g).hom ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow =
(kernelSubobject (f ≫ g)).arrow ≫ f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIsoComp]
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectIsoComp_inv_arrow {X' : C} (f : X' ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel g] :
(kernelSubobjectIsoComp f g).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject (f ≫ g)).arrow =
(kernelSubobject g).arrow ≫ inv f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIsoComp]
/-- The kernel of `f` is always a smaller subobject than the kernel of `f ≫ h`. -/
theorem kernelSubobject_comp_le (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [HasKernel (f ≫ h)] :
kernelSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject (f ≫ h) :=
le_kernelSubobject _ _ (by simp)
/-- Postcomposing by a monomorphism does not change the kernel subobject. -/
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobject_comp_mono (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono h] :
kernelSubobject (f ≫ h) = kernelSubobject f :=
le_antisymm (le_kernelSubobject _ _ ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simp))) (kernelSubobject_comp_le f h)
instance kernelSubobject_comp_mono_isIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f] {Z : C} (h : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono h] :
IsIso (Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le f h)) := by
rw [ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm (kernelCompMono f h).inv]
· infer_instance
· simp
/-- Taking cokernels is an order-reversing map from the subobjects of `X` to the quotient objects
of `X`. -/
@[simps]
def cokernelOrderHom [HasCokernels C] (X : C) : Subobject X →o (Subobject (op X))ᵒᵈ where
toFun :=
Subobject.lift (fun _ f _ => Subobject.mk (cokernel.π f).op)
(by
rintro A B f g hf hg i rfl
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ (Iso.op ?_) (Quiver.Hom.unop_inj ?_)
· exact (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _)
(isCokernelEpiComp (colimit.isColimit _) i.hom rfl)).symm
· simp only [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Iso.op_hom, Iso.symm_hom, unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op,
colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom, Cofork.ofπ_ι_app,
coequalizer.cofork_π])
monotone' :=
Subobject.ind₂ _ <| by
intro A B f g hf hg h
dsimp only [Subobject.lift_mk]
refine Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (cokernel.desc f (cokernel.π g) ?_).op ?_
· rw [← Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp h, Category.assoc, cokernel.condition, comp_zero]
· exact Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (cokernel.π_desc _ _ _)
/-- Taking kernels is an order-reversing map from the quotient objects of `X` to the subobjects of
`X`. -/
@[simps]
def kernelOrderHom [HasKernels C] (X : C) : (Subobject (op X))ᵒᵈ →o Subobject X where
toFun :=
Subobject.lift (fun _ f _ => Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f.unop))
(by
rintro A B f g hf hg i rfl
refine Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _)
(isKernelCompMono (limit.isLimit (parallelPair g.unop 0)) i.unop.hom rfl)
· dsimp
simp only [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp,
Fork.ofι_π_app])
monotone' :=
Subobject.ind₂ _ <| by
intro A B f g hf hg h
dsimp only [Subobject.lift_mk]
refine Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (kernel.lift g.unop (kernel.ι f.unop) ?_) ?_
· rw [← Subobject.ofMkLEMk_comp h, unop_comp, kernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
· exact Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
end Kernel
section Image
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f]
/-- The image of a morphism `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject Y`. -/
abbrev imageSubobject : Subobject Y :=
Subobject.mk (image.ι f)
/-- The underlying object of `imageSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `image f`. -/
def imageSubobjectIso : (imageSubobject f : C) ≅ image f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (image.ι f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow :
(imageSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ image.ι f = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by simp [imageSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow' :
(imageSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (imageSubobject f).arrow = image.ι f := by simp [imageSubobjectIso]
/-- A factorisation of `f : X ⟶ Y` through `imageSubobject f`. -/
def factorThruImageSubobject : X ⟶ imageSubobject f :=
factorThruImage f ≫ (imageSubobjectIso f).inv
instance [HasEqualizers C] : Epi (factorThruImageSubobject f) := by
dsimp [factorThruImageSubobject]
apply epi_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow_comp : factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ (imageSubobject f).arrow = f := by
simp [factorThruImageSubobject, imageSubobject_arrow]
theorem imageSubobject_arrow_comp_eq_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
[HasImage f] [Epi (factorThruImageSubobject f)] (h : f ≫ g = 0) :
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ g = 0 :=
zero_of_epi_comp (factorThruImageSubobject f) <| by simp [h]
theorem imageSubobject_factors_comp_self {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) : (imageSubobject f).Factors (k ≫ f) :=
⟨k ≫ factorThruImage f, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_self {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h) :
(imageSubobject f).factorThru (k ≫ f) h = k ≫ factorThruImageSubobject f := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_self_assoc {W W' : C} (k : W ⟶ W') (k' : W' ⟶ X) (h) :
(imageSubobject f).factorThru (k ≫ k' ≫ f) h = k ≫ k' ≫ factorThruImageSubobject f := by
ext
simp
/-- The image of `h ≫ f` is always a smaller subobject than the image of `f`. -/
theorem imageSubobject_comp_le {X' : C} (h : X' ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasImage f] [HasImage (h ≫ f)] :
imageSubobject (h ≫ f) ≤ imageSubobject f :=
Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm (image.preComp h f) (by simp)
section
open ZeroObject
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroObject C]
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobject_zero_arrow : (imageSubobject (0 : X ⟶ Y)).arrow = 0 := by
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
simp
@[simp]
theorem imageSubobject_zero {A B : C} : imageSubobject (0 : A ⟶ B) = ⊥ :=
Subobject.eq_of_comm (imageSubobjectIso _ ≪≫ imageZero ≪≫ Subobject.botCoeIsoZero.symm) (by simp)
end
section
variable [HasEqualizers C]
/-- The morphism `imageSubobject (h ≫ f) ⟶ imageSubobject f`
is an epimorphism when `h` is an epimorphism.
| In general this does not imply that `imageSubobject (h ≫ f) = imageSubobject f`,
although it will when the ambient category is abelian.
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 338 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
π.eq_of_le_of_le (π.biUnionIndex_mem this) hJ (π.le_biUnionIndex this) (le_of_mem _ hJ')
theorem biUnion_assoc (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (πi' : Box ι → ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion fun J => (πi J).biUnion (πi' J)) =
(π.biUnion πi).biUnion fun J => πi' (π.biUnionIndex πi J) J := by
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro ⟨J₁, hJ₁, J₂, hJ₂, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₂⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂]
· rintro ⟨J₁, ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₁⟩, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, hJ₂, J₁, hJ₁, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₂ hJ₁] at hJ
/-- Create a `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` from a collection of possibly empty boxes by filtering out
the empty one if it exists. -/
def ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.eraseNone boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
rw [mem_eraseNone] at hJ
simpa only [WithBot.some_eq_coe, WithBot.coe_le_coe] using le_of_mem _ hJ
pairwiseDisjoint J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne := by
simp only [mem_coe, mem_eraseNone] at h₁ h₂
exact Box.disjoint_coe.1 (pairwise_disjoint h₁ h₂ (mt Option.some_inj.1 hne))
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {h₁ h₂} :
J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ∈ boxes :=
mem_eraseNone
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
(ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, ↑J := by
suffices ⋃ (J : Box ι) (_ : ↑J ∈ boxes), ↑J = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) by
simpa [ofWithBot, Prepartition.iUnion]
simp only [← Box.biUnion_coe_eq_coe, @iUnion_comm _ _ (Box ι), @iUnion_comm _ _ (@Eq _ _ _),
iUnion_iUnion_eq_right]
theorem ofWithBot_le {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ ↑J') :
ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint ≤ π := by
have : ∀ J : Box ι, ↑J ∈ boxes → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ J' := fun J hJ => by
simpa only [WithBot.coe_le_coe] using H J hJ WithBot.coe_ne_bot
simpa [ofWithBot, le_def]
theorem le_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ π, ∃ J' ∈ boxes, ↑J ≤ J') : π ≤ ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint := by
intro J hJ
rcases H J hJ with ⟨J', J'mem, hle⟩
lift J' to Box ι using ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot WithBot.coe_ne_bot hle
exact ⟨J', mem_ofWithBot.2 J'mem, WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 hle⟩
theorem ofWithBot_mono {boxes₁ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem₁ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₁ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₁ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
{boxes₂ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {le_of_mem₂ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₂, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₂ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₂ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ boxes₂, J ≤ J') :
ofWithBot boxes₁ le_of_mem₁ pairwise_disjoint₁ ≤
ofWithBot boxes₂ le_of_mem₂ pairwise_disjoint₂ :=
le_ofWithBot _ fun J hJ => H J (mem_ofWithBot.1 hJ) WithBot.coe_ne_bot
theorem sum_ofWithBot {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ boxes, Option.elim' 0 f J :=
Finset.sum_eraseNone _ _
open scoped Classical in
/-- Restrict a prepartition to a box. -/
def restrict (π : Prepartition I) (J : Box ι) : Prepartition J :=
ofWithBot (π.boxes.image fun J' : Box ι => J ⊓ J')
(fun J' hJ' => by
rcases Finset.mem_image.1 hJ' with ⟨J', -, rfl⟩
exact inf_le_left)
(by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, onFun, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_image]
rintro _ ⟨J₁, h₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨J₂, h₂, rfl⟩ Hne
have : J₁ ≠ J₂ := by
rintro rfl
exact Hne rfl
exact ((Box.disjoint_coe.2 <| π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ this).inf_left' _).inf_right' _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : WithBot (Box ι)) = ↑J ⊓ ↑J' := by
simp [restrict, eq_comm]
theorem mem_restrict' : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑J ∩ ↑J' := by
simp only [mem_restrict, ← Box.withBotCoe_inj, Box.coe_inf, Box.coe_coe]
@[mono]
theorem restrict_mono {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} (Hle : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.restrict J ≤ π₂.restrict J := by
classical
refine ofWithBot_mono fun J₁ hJ₁ hne => ?_
rw [Finset.mem_image] at hJ₁; rcases hJ₁ with ⟨J₁, hJ₁, rfl⟩
rcases Hle hJ₁ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩
exact ⟨_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hJ₂, inf_le_inf_left _ <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 hle⟩
theorem monotone_restrict : Monotone fun π : Prepartition I => restrict π J :=
fun _ _ => restrict_mono
/-- Restricting to a larger box does not change the set of boxes. We cannot claim equality
of prepartitions because they have different types. -/
theorem restrict_boxes_of_le (π : Prepartition I) (h : I ≤ J) : (π.restrict J).boxes = π.boxes := by
classical
simp only [restrict, ofWithBot, eraseNone_eq_biUnion]
refine Finset.image_biUnion.trans ?_
refine (Finset.biUnion_congr rfl ?_).trans Finset.biUnion_singleton_eq_self
intro J' hJ'
rw [inf_of_le_right, ← WithBot.some_eq_coe, Option.toFinset_some]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 ((π.le_of_mem hJ').trans h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_self : π.restrict I = π :=
injective_boxes <| restrict_boxes_of_le π le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_restrict : (π.restrict J).iUnion = (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) ∩ (π.iUnion) := by
simp [restrict, ← inter_iUnion, ← iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_biUnion (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (hJ : J ∈ π) :
(π.biUnion πi).restrict J = πi J := by
refine (eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (fun J₁ h₁ => ?_) ?_).symm
· refine (mem_restrict _).2 ⟨J₁, π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, h₁⟩, (inf_of_le_right ?_).symm⟩
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (le_of_mem _ h₁)
· simp only [iUnion_restrict, iUnion_biUnion, Set.subset_def, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iUnion]
rintro x ⟨hxJ, J₁, h₁, hx⟩
obtain rfl : J = J₁ := π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ h₁ hxJ (iUnion_subset _ hx)
exact hx
theorem biUnion_le_iff {πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J} {π' : Prepartition I} :
π.biUnion πi ≤ π' ↔ ∀ J ∈ π, πi J ≤ π'.restrict J := by
constructor <;> intro H J hJ
· rw [← π.restrict_biUnion πi hJ]
exact restrict_mono H
· rw [mem_biUnion] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J₁, h₁, hJ⟩
rcases H J₁ h₁ hJ with ⟨J₂, h₂, Hle⟩
rcases π'.mem_restrict.mp h₂ with ⟨J₃, h₃, H⟩
exact ⟨J₃, h₃, Hle.trans <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <| H.trans_le inf_le_right⟩
theorem le_biUnion_iff {πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J} {π' : Prepartition I} :
π' ≤ π.biUnion πi ↔ π' ≤ π ∧ ∀ J ∈ π, π'.restrict J ≤ πi J := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.trans (π.biUnion_le πi), fun J hJ => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← π.restrict_biUnion πi hJ]
exact restrict_mono H
· rintro ⟨H, Hi⟩ J' hJ'
rcases H hJ' with ⟨J, hJ, hle⟩
have : J' ∈ π'.restrict J :=
π'.mem_restrict.2 ⟨J', hJ', (inf_of_le_right <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 hle).symm⟩
rcases Hi J hJ this with ⟨Ji, hJi, hlei⟩
exact ⟨Ji, π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJi⟩, hlei⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (Prepartition I) :=
{ inf := fun π₁ π₂ => π₁.biUnion fun J => π₂.restrict J
inf_le_left := fun π₁ _ => π₁.biUnion_le _
inf_le_right := fun _ _ => (biUnion_le_iff _).2 fun _ _ => le_rfl
le_inf := fun _ π₁ _ h₁ h₂ => π₁.le_biUnion_iff.2 ⟨h₁, fun _ _ => restrict_mono h₂⟩ }
theorem inf_def (π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I) : π₁ ⊓ π₂ = π₁.biUnion fun J => π₂.restrict J := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} :
J ∈ π₁ ⊓ π₂ ↔ ∃ J₁ ∈ π₁, ∃ J₂ ∈ π₂, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) = ↑J₁ ⊓ ↑J₂ := by
simp only [inf_def, mem_biUnion, mem_restrict]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_inf (π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I) : (π₁ ⊓ π₂).iUnion = π₁.iUnion ∩ π₂.iUnion := by
simp only [inf_def, iUnion_biUnion, iUnion_restrict, ← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_def]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The prepartition with boxes `{J ∈ π | p J}`. -/
@[simps]
def filter (π : Prepartition I) (p : Box ι → Prop) : Prepartition I where
boxes := {J ∈ π.boxes | p J}
le_of_mem' _ hJ := π.le_of_mem (mem_filter.1 hJ).1
pairwiseDisjoint _ h₁ _ h₂ := π.disjoint_coe_of_mem (mem_filter.1 h₁).1 (mem_filter.1 h₂).1
@[simp]
theorem mem_filter {p : Box ι → Prop} : J ∈ π.filter p ↔ J ∈ π ∧ p J := by
classical
exact Finset.mem_filter
theorem filter_le (π : Prepartition I) (p : Box ι → Prop) : π.filter p ≤ π := fun J hJ =>
let ⟨hπ, _⟩ := π.mem_filter.1 hJ
⟨J, hπ, le_rfl⟩
theorem filter_of_true {p : Box ι → Prop} (hp : ∀ J ∈ π, p J) : π.filter p = π := by
ext J
simpa using hp J
@[simp]
theorem filter_true : (π.filter fun _ => True) = π :=
π.filter_of_true fun _ _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_filter_not (π : Prepartition I) (p : Box ι → Prop) :
(π.filter fun J => ¬p J).iUnion = π.iUnion \ (π.filter p).iUnion := by
simp only [Prepartition.iUnion]
convert
(@Set.biUnion_diff_biUnion_eq (ι → ℝ) (Box ι) π.boxes (π.filter p).boxes (↑) _).symm using 4
· simp +contextual
· rw [Set.PairwiseDisjoint]
convert π.pairwiseDisjoint
rw [Set.union_eq_left, filter_boxes, coe_filter]
exact fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
open scoped Classical in
theorem sum_fiberwise {α M} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I) (f : Box ι → α) (g : Box ι → M) :
(∑ y ∈ π.boxes.image f, ∑ J ∈ (π.filter fun J => f J = y).boxes, g J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, g J := by
convert sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ => Finset.mem_image_of_mem f) g
open scoped Classical in
/-- Union of two disjoint prepartitions. -/
@[simps]
def disjUnion (π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I) (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π₁.boxes ∪ π₂.boxes
le_of_mem' _ hJ := (Finset.mem_union.1 hJ).elim π₁.le_of_mem π₂.le_of_mem
pairwiseDisjoint :=
suffices ∀ J₁ ∈ π₁, ∀ J₂ ∈ π₂, J₁ ≠ J₂ → Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ by
simpa [pairwise_union_of_symmetric (symmetric_disjoint.comap _), pairwiseDisjoint]
fun _ h₁ _ h₂ _ => h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion (H : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
J ∈ π₁.disjUnion π₂ H ↔ J ∈ π₁ ∨ J ∈ π₂ := by
classical exact Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_disjUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
(π₁.disjUnion π₂ h).iUnion = π₁.iUnion ∪ π₂.iUnion := by
simp [disjUnion, Prepartition.iUnion, iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_disj_union_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion)
(f : Box ι → M) :
∑ J ∈ π₁.boxes ∪ π₂.boxes, f J = (∑ J ∈ π₁.boxes, f J) + ∑ J ∈ π₂.boxes, f J :=
sum_union <| disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion h
section Distortion
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- The distortion of a prepartition is the maximum of the distortions of the boxes of this
prepartition. -/
def distortion : ℝ≥0 :=
π.boxes.sup Box.distortion
theorem distortion_le_of_mem (h : J ∈ π) : J.distortion ≤ π.distortion :=
le_sup h
theorem distortion_le_iff {c : ℝ≥0} : π.distortion ≤ c ↔ ∀ J ∈ π, Box.distortion J ≤ c :=
Finset.sup_le_iff
theorem distortion_biUnion (π : Prepartition I) (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).distortion = π.boxes.sup fun J => (πi J).distortion := by
classical exact sup_biUnion _ _
@[simp]
theorem distortion_disjUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
(π₁.disjUnion π₂ h).distortion = max π₁.distortion π₂.distortion := by
classical exact sup_union
theorem distortion_of_const {c} (h₁ : π.boxes.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ J ∈ π, Box.distortion J = c) :
π.distortion = c :=
(sup_congr rfl h₂).trans (sup_const h₁ _)
@[simp]
theorem distortion_top (I : Box ι) : distortion (⊤ : Prepartition I) = I.distortion :=
sup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem distortion_bot (I : Box ι) : distortion (⊥ : Prepartition I) = 0 :=
sup_empty
end Distortion
/-- A prepartition `π` of `I` is a partition if the boxes of `π` cover the whole `I`. -/
def IsPartition (π : Prepartition I) :=
∀ x ∈ I, ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J
| theorem isPartition_iff_iUnion_eq {π : Prepartition I} : π.IsPartition ↔ π.iUnion = I := by
simp_rw [IsPartition, Set.Subset.antisymm_iff, π.iUnion_subset, true_and, Set.subset_def,
mem_iUnion, Box.mem_coe]
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 633 | 636 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file defines notation for vectors and matrices. Given `a b c d : α`,
the notation allows us to write `![a, b, c, d] : Fin 4 → α`.
Nesting vectors gives coefficients of a matrix, so `![![a, b], ![c, d]] : Fin 2 → Fin 2 → α`.
In later files we introduce `!![a, b; c, d]` as notation for `Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Main definitions
* `vecEmpty` is the empty vector (or `0` by `n` matrix) `![]`
* `vecCons` prepends an entry to a vector, so `![a, b]` is `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
The main new notation is `![a, b]`, which gets expanded to `vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
section MatrixNotation
/-- `![]` is the vector with no entries. -/
def vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α :=
Fin.elim0
/-- `vecCons h t` prepends an entry `h` to a vector `t`.
The inverse functions are `vecHead` and `vecTail`.
The notation `![a, b, ...]` expands to `vecCons a (vecCons b ...)`.
-/
def vecCons {n : ℕ} (h : α) (t : Fin n → α) : Fin n.succ → α :=
Fin.cons h t
/-- `![...]` notation is used to construct a vector `Fin n → α` using `Matrix.vecEmpty` and
`Matrix.vecCons`.
For instance, `![a, b, c] : Fin 3` is syntax for `vecCons a (vecCons b (vecCons c vecEmpty))`.
Note that this should not be used as syntax for `Matrix` as it generates a term with the wrong type.
The `!![a, b; c, d]` syntax (provided by `Matrix.matrixNotation`) should be used instead.
-/
syntax (name := vecNotation) "![" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(![$term:term, $terms:term,*]) => `(vecCons $term ![$terms,*])
| `(![$term:term]) => `(vecCons $term ![])
| `(![]) => `(vecEmpty)
/-- Unexpander for the `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecCons]
def vecConsUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $term ![$term2, $terms,*]) => `(![$term, $term2, $terms,*])
| `($_ $term ![$term2]) => `(![$term, $term2])
| `($_ $term ![]) => `(![$term])
| _ => throw ()
/-- Unexpander for the `![]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander vecEmpty]
def vecEmptyUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_:ident) => `(![])
| _ => throw ()
/-- `vecHead v` gives the first entry of the vector `v` -/
def vecHead {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : α :=
v 0
/-- `vecTail v` gives a vector consisting of all entries of `v` except the first -/
def vecTail {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → α) : Fin n → α :=
v ∘ Fin.succ
variable {m n : ℕ}
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a vector `Fin n → α`, for example:
```
#eval ![1, 2] + ![3, 4] -- ![4, 6]
```
-/
instance _root_.PiFin.hasRepr [Repr α] : Repr (Fin n → α) where
reprPrec f _ :=
Std.Format.bracket "![" (Std.Format.joinSep
((List.finRange n).map fun n => repr (f n)) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
end MatrixNotation
variable {m n o : ℕ}
theorem empty_eq (v : Fin 0 → α) : v = ![] :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
section Val
@[simp]
theorem head_fin_const (a : α) : (vecHead fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_zero (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u 0 = x :=
rfl
theorem cons_val_zero' (h : 0 < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) : vecCons x u ⟨0, h⟩ = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) (i : Fin m) : vecCons x u i.succ = u i := by
simp [vecCons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_val_succ' {i : ℕ} (h : i.succ < m.succ) (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
vecCons x u ⟨i.succ, h⟩ = u ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := by
simp only [vecCons, Fin.cons, Fin.cases_succ']
section simprocs
open Lean Qq
/-- Parses a chain of `Matrix.vecCons` calls into elements, leaving everything else in the tail.
`let ⟨xs, tailn, tail⟩ ← matchVecConsPrefix n e` decomposes `e : Fin n → _` in the form
`vecCons x₀ <| ... <| vecCons xₙ <| tail` where `tail : Fin tailn → _`. -/
partial def matchVecConsPrefix (n : Q(Nat)) (e : Expr) : MetaM <| List Expr × Q(Nat) × Expr := do
match_expr ← Meta.whnfR e with
| Matrix.vecCons _ n x xs => do
let (elems, n', tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix n xs
return (x :: elems, n', tail)
| _ =>
return ([], n, e)
open Qq in
/-- A simproc that handles terms of the form `Matrix.vecCons a f i` where `i` is a numeric literal.
In practice, this is most effective at handling `![a, b, c] i`-style terms. -/
dsimproc cons_val (Matrix.vecCons _ _ _) := fun e => do
let_expr Matrix.vecCons α en x xs' ei := ← Meta.whnfR e | return .continue
let some i := ei.int? | return .continue
let (xs, etailn, tail) ← matchVecConsPrefix en xs'
let xs := x :: xs
-- Determine if the tail is a numeral or only an offset.
let (tailn, variadic, etailn) ← do
let etailn_whnf : Q(ℕ) ← Meta.whnfD etailn
if let Expr.lit (.natVal length) := etailn_whnf then
pure (length, false, q(OfNat.ofNat $etailn_whnf))
else if let .some ((base : Q(ℕ)), offset) ← (Meta.isOffset? etailn_whnf).run then
let offset_e : Q(ℕ) := mkNatLit offset
pure (offset, true, q($base + $offset))
else
pure (0, true, etailn)
-- Wrap the index if possible, and abort if not
let wrapped_i ←
| if variadic then
-- can't wrap as we don't know the length
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/VecNotation.lean | 173 | 174 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
/-!
# Everywhere positive sets in measure spaces
A set `s` in a topological space with a measure `μ` is *everywhere positive* (also called
*self-supporting*) if any neighborhood `n` of any point of `s` satisfies `μ (s ∩ n) > 0`.
## Main definitions and results
* `μ.IsEverywherePos s` registers that, for any point in `s`, all its neighborhoods have positive
measure inside `s`.
* `μ.everywherePosSubset s` is the subset of `s` made of those points all of whose neighborhoods
have positive measure inside `s`.
* `everywherePosSubset_ae_eq` shows that `s` and `μ.everywherePosSubset s` coincide almost
everywhere if `μ` is inner regular and `s` is measurable.
* `isEverywherePos_everywherePosSubset` shows that `μ.everywherePosSubset s` satisfies the property
`μ.IsEverywherePos` if `μ` is inner regular and `s` is measurable.
The latter two statements have also versions when `μ` is inner regular for finite measure sets,
assuming additionally that `s` has finite measure.
* `IsEverywherePos.IsGδ` proves that an everywhere positive compact closed set is a Gδ set,
in a topological group with a left-invariant measure. This is a nontrivial statement, used
crucially in the study of the uniqueness of Haar measures.
* `innerRegularWRT_preimage_one_hasCompactSupport_measure_ne_top`: for a Haar measure, any
finite measure set can be approximated from inside by level sets of continuous
compactly supported functions. This property is also known as completion-regularity of Haar
measures.
-/
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal
open Set Filter
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- A set `s` is *everywhere positive* (also called *self-supporting*) with respect to a
measure `μ` if it has positive measure around each of its points, i.e., if all neighborhoods `n`
of points of `s` satisfy `μ (s ∩ n) > 0`. -/
def IsEverywherePos (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ n ∈ 𝓝[s] x, 0 < μ n
/-- The everywhere positive subset of a set is the subset made of those points all of whose
neighborhoods have positive measure inside the set. -/
def everywherePosSubset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Set α :=
{x | x ∈ s ∧ ∀ n ∈ 𝓝[s] x, 0 < μ n}
lemma everywherePosSubset_subset (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : μ.everywherePosSubset s ⊆ s :=
fun _x hx ↦ hx.1
/-- The everywhere positive subset of a set is obtained by removing an open set. -/
lemma exists_isOpen_everywherePosSubset_eq_diff (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ μ.everywherePosSubset s = s \ u := by
refine ⟨{x | ∃ n ∈ 𝓝[s] x, μ n = 0}, ?_, by ext x; simp [everywherePosSubset, zero_lt_iff]⟩
rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
intro x ⟨n, ns, hx⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 ns with ⟨v, vx, hv⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 vx with ⟨w, wv, w_open, xw⟩
have A : w ⊆ {x | ∃ n ∈ 𝓝[s] x, μ n = 0} := by
intro y yw
refine ⟨s ∩ w, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (w_open.mem_nhds yw), measure_mono_null ?_ hx⟩
rw [inter_comm]
exact (inter_subset_inter_left _ wv).trans hv
have B : w ∈ 𝓝 x := w_open.mem_nhds xw
exact mem_of_superset B A
variable {μ ν : Measure α} {s k : Set α}
protected lemma _root_.MeasurableSet.everywherePosSubset [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet (μ.everywherePosSubset s) := by
rcases exists_isOpen_everywherePosSubset_eq_diff μ s with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [hu]
exact hs.diff u_open.measurableSet
protected lemma _root_.IsClosed.everywherePosSubset (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosed (μ.everywherePosSubset s) := by
rcases exists_isOpen_everywherePosSubset_eq_diff μ s with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [hu]
exact hs.sdiff u_open
protected lemma _root_.IsCompact.everywherePosSubset (hs : IsCompact s) :
IsCompact (μ.everywherePosSubset s) := by
rcases exists_isOpen_everywherePosSubset_eq_diff μ s with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [hu]
exact hs.diff u_open
/-- Any compact set contained in `s \ μ.everywherePosSubset s` has zero measure. -/
lemma measure_eq_zero_of_subset_diff_everywherePosSubset
(hk : IsCompact k) (h'k : k ⊆ s \ μ.everywherePosSubset s) : μ k = 0 := by
apply hk.induction_on (p := fun t ↦ μ t = 0)
· exact measure_empty
· exact fun s t hst ht ↦ measure_mono_null hst ht
· exact fun s t hs ht ↦ measure_union_null hs ht
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨u, ux, hu⟩ : ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[s] x, μ u = 0 := by
simpa [everywherePosSubset, (h'k hx).1] using (h'k hx).2
exact ⟨u, nhdsWithin_mono x (h'k.trans diff_subset) ux, hu⟩
/-- In a space with an inner regular measure, any measurable set coincides almost everywhere with
its everywhere positive subset. -/
lemma everywherePosSubset_ae_eq [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [InnerRegular μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.everywherePosSubset s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
simp only [ae_eq_set, diff_eq_empty.mpr (everywherePosSubset_subset μ s), measure_empty,
true_and, (hs.diff hs.everywherePosSubset).measure_eq_iSup_isCompact, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
intro k hk h'k
exact measure_eq_zero_of_subset_diff_everywherePosSubset h'k hk
/-- In a space with an inner regular measure for finite measure sets, any measurable set of finite
measure coincides almost everywhere with its everywhere positive subset. -/
lemma everywherePosSubset_ae_eq_of_measure_ne_top
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ.everywherePosSubset s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
have A : μ (s \ μ.everywherePosSubset s) ≠ ∞ :=
((measure_mono diff_subset).trans_lt h's.lt_top).ne
simp only [ae_eq_set, diff_eq_empty.mpr (everywherePosSubset_subset μ s), measure_empty,
true_and, (hs.diff hs.everywherePosSubset).measure_eq_iSup_isCompact_of_ne_top A,
ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
intro k hk h'k
exact measure_eq_zero_of_subset_diff_everywherePosSubset h'k hk
/-- In a space with an inner regular measure, the everywhere positive subset of a measurable set
is itself everywhere positive. This is not obvious as `μ.everywherePosSubset s` is defined as
the points whose neighborhoods intersect `s` along positive measure subsets, but this does not
say they also intersect `μ.everywherePosSubset s` along positive measure subsets. -/
lemma isEverywherePos_everywherePosSubset
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [InnerRegular μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.IsEverywherePos (μ.everywherePosSubset s) := by
intro x hx n hn
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 hn with ⟨u, u_mem, hu⟩
have A : 0 < μ (u ∩ s) := by
have : u ∩ s ∈ 𝓝[s] x := by rw [inter_comm]; exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin s u_mem
exact hx.2 _ this
have B : (u ∩ μ.everywherePosSubset s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (u ∩ s : Set α) :=
ae_eq_set_inter (ae_eq_refl _) (everywherePosSubset_ae_eq hs)
rw [← B.measure_eq] at A
exact A.trans_le (measure_mono hu)
/-- In a space with an inner regular measure for finite measure sets, the everywhere positive subset
of a measurable set of finite measure is itself everywhere positive. This is not obvious as
`μ.everywherePosSubset s` is defined as the points whose neighborhoods intersect `s` along positive
measure subsets, but this does not say they also intersect `μ.everywherePosSubset s` along positive
measure subsets. -/
lemma isEverywherePos_everywherePosSubset_of_measure_ne_top
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [InnerRegularCompactLTTop μ] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ.IsEverywherePos (μ.everywherePosSubset s) := by
intro x hx n hn
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 hn with ⟨u, u_mem, hu⟩
have A : 0 < μ (u ∩ s) := by
have : u ∩ s ∈ 𝓝[s] x := by rw [inter_comm]; exact inter_mem_nhdsWithin s u_mem
exact hx.2 _ this
have B : (u ∩ μ.everywherePosSubset s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (u ∩ s : Set α) :=
ae_eq_set_inter (ae_eq_refl _) (everywherePosSubset_ae_eq_of_measure_ne_top hs h's)
rw [← B.measure_eq] at A
exact A.trans_le (measure_mono hu)
lemma IsEverywherePos.smul_measure (hs : IsEverywherePos μ s) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
IsEverywherePos (c • μ) s :=
fun x hx n hn ↦ by simpa [hc.bot_lt, hs x hx n hn] using hc.bot_lt
|
lemma IsEverywherePos.smul_measure_nnreal (hs : IsEverywherePos μ s) {c : ℝ≥0} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
IsEverywherePos (c • μ) s :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/EverywherePos.lean | 169 | 171 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Associator
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Linear
/-!
# The monoidal category structure on R-modules
Mostly this uses existing machinery in `LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct`.
We just need to provide a few small missing pieces to build the
`MonoidalCategory` instance.
The `SymmetricCategory` instance is in `Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Monoidal.Symmetric`
to reduce imports.
Note the universe level of the modules must be at least the universe level of the ring,
so that we have a monoidal unit.
For now, we simplify by insisting both universe levels are the same.
We construct the monoidal closed structure on `ModuleCat R` in
`Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Monoidal.Closed`.
If you're happy using the bundled `ModuleCat R`, it may be possible to mostly
use this as an interface and not need to interact much with the implementation details.
-/
suppress_compilation
universe v w x u
open CategoryTheory
namespace ModuleCat
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
namespace MonoidalCategory
-- The definitions inside this namespace are essentially private.
-- After we build the `MonoidalCategory (Module R)` instance,
-- you should use that API.
open TensorProduct
attribute [local ext] TensorProduct.ext
/-- (implementation) tensor product of R-modules -/
def tensorObj (M N : ModuleCat R) : ModuleCat R :=
ModuleCat.of R (M ⊗[R] N)
/-- (implementation) tensor product of morphisms R-modules -/
def tensorHom {M N M' N' : ModuleCat R} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : M' ⟶ N') :
tensorObj M M' ⟶ tensorObj N N' :=
ofHom <| TensorProduct.map f.hom g.hom
/-- (implementation) left whiskering for R-modules -/
def whiskerLeft (M : ModuleCat R) {N₁ N₂ : ModuleCat R} (f : N₁ ⟶ N₂) :
tensorObj M N₁ ⟶ tensorObj M N₂ :=
ofHom <| f.hom.lTensor M
/-- (implementation) right whiskering for R-modules -/
def whiskerRight {M₁ M₂ : ModuleCat R} (f : M₁ ⟶ M₂) (N : ModuleCat R) :
tensorObj M₁ N ⟶ tensorObj M₂ N :=
ofHom <| f.hom.rTensor N
theorem tensor_id (M N : ModuleCat R) : tensorHom (𝟙 M) (𝟙 N) = 𝟙 (ModuleCat.of R (M ⊗ N)) := by
ext : 1
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11041): even with high priority `ext` fails to find this.
apply TensorProduct.ext
rfl
theorem tensor_comp {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : ModuleCat R} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁)
(g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂) : tensorHom (f₁ ≫ g₁) (f₂ ≫ g₂) = tensorHom f₁ f₂ ≫ tensorHom g₁ g₂ := by
ext : 1
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11041): even with high priority `ext` fails to find this.
apply TensorProduct.ext
rfl
/-- (implementation) the associator for R-modules -/
def associator (M : ModuleCat.{v} R) (N : ModuleCat.{w} R) (K : ModuleCat.{x} R) :
tensorObj (tensorObj M N) K ≅ tensorObj M (tensorObj N K) :=
(TensorProduct.assoc R M N K).toModuleIso
/-- (implementation) the left unitor for R-modules -/
def leftUnitor (M : ModuleCat.{u} R) : ModuleCat.of R (R ⊗[R] M) ≅ M :=
(LinearEquiv.toModuleIso (TensorProduct.lid R M) : of R (R ⊗ M) ≅ of R M).trans (ofSelfIso M)
/-- (implementation) the right unitor for R-modules -/
def rightUnitor (M : ModuleCat.{u} R) : ModuleCat.of R (M ⊗[R] R) ≅ M :=
(LinearEquiv.toModuleIso (TensorProduct.rid R M) : of R (M ⊗ R) ≅ of R M).trans (ofSelfIso M)
@[simps -isSimp]
instance instMonoidalCategoryStruct : MonoidalCategoryStruct (ModuleCat.{u} R) where
tensorObj := tensorObj
whiskerLeft := whiskerLeft
whiskerRight := whiskerRight
tensorHom f g := ofHom <| TensorProduct.map f.hom g.hom
tensorUnit := ModuleCat.of R R
associator := associator
leftUnitor := leftUnitor
rightUnitor := rightUnitor
theorem associator_naturality {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : ModuleCat R} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂)
(f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃) :
tensorHom (tensorHom f₁ f₂) f₃ ≫ (associator Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom =
(associator X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ tensorHom f₁ (tensorHom f₂ f₃) := by
ext : 1
apply TensorProduct.ext_threefold
intro x y z
rfl
theorem pentagon (W X Y Z : ModuleCat R) :
whiskerRight (associator W X Y).hom Z ≫
(associator W (tensorObj X Y) Z).hom ≫ whiskerLeft W (associator X Y Z).hom =
(associator (tensorObj W X) Y Z).hom ≫ (associator W X (tensorObj Y Z)).hom := by
ext : 1
apply TensorProduct.ext_fourfold
intro w x y z
rfl
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {M N : ModuleCat R} (f : M ⟶ N) :
tensorHom (𝟙 (ModuleCat.of R R)) f ≫ (leftUnitor N).hom = (leftUnitor M).hom ≫ f := by
ext : 1
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11041): broken ext
apply TensorProduct.ext
ext x
dsimp
erw [TensorProduct.lid_tmul, TensorProduct.lid_tmul]
rw [LinearMap.map_smul]
rfl
theorem rightUnitor_naturality {M N : ModuleCat R} (f : M ⟶ N) :
| tensorHom f (𝟙 (ModuleCat.of R R)) ≫ (rightUnitor N).hom = (rightUnitor M).hom ≫ f := by
ext : 1
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11041): broken ext
apply TensorProduct.ext
ext x
dsimp
erw [TensorProduct.rid_tmul, TensorProduct.rid_tmul]
rw [LinearMap.map_smul]
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/Monoidal/Basic.lean | 136 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Kim Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
/-!
# Limits in concrete categories
In this file, we combine the description of limits in `Types` and the API about
the preservation of products and pullbacks in order to describe these limits in a
concrete category `C`.
If `F : J → C` is a family of objects in `C`, we define a bijection
`Limits.Concrete.productEquiv F : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)`.
Similarly, if `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S` are two morphisms, the elements
in `pullback f₁ f₂` are identified by `Limits.Concrete.pullbackEquiv`
to compatible tuples of elements in `X₁ × X₂`.
Some results are also obtained for the terminal object, binary products,
wide-pullbacks, wide-pushouts, multiequalizers and cokernels.
-/
universe w w' v u t r
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section Products
section ProductEquiv
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type max w v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w v} C FC] {J : Type w} (F : J → C)
[HasProduct F] [PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor F) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j)` if `F : J → C` is a family of objects
in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def productEquiv : ToType (∏ᶜ F) ≃ ∀ j, ToType (F j) :=
((PreservesProduct.iso (forget C) F) ≪≫ (Types.productIso.{w, v} fun j => ToType (F j))).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_apply_apply (x : ToType (∏ᶜ F)) (j : J) :
productEquiv F x j = Pi.π F j x :=
congr_fun (piComparison_comp_π (forget C) F j) x
@[simp]
lemma productEquiv_symm_apply_π (x : ∀ j, ToType (F j)) (j : J) :
Pi.π F j ((productEquiv F).symm x) = x j := by
rw [← productEquiv_apply_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
end ProductEquiv
section ProductExt
variable {J : Type w} (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] {D : Type t} [Category.{r} D]
variable {FD : D → D → Type*} {DD : D → Type max w r} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FD X Y) (DD X) (DD Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w r} D FD] (F : C ⥤ D)
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor f) F]
[HasProduct fun j => F.obj (f j)]
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan (forget D)]
[PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor fun b ↦ F.toPrefunctor.obj (f b)) (forget D)]
lemma Pi.map_ext (x y : ToType (F.obj (∏ᶜ f : C)))
(h : ∀ i, F.map (Pi.π f i) x = F.map (Pi.π f i) y) : x = y := by
apply ConcreteCategory.injective_of_mono_of_preservesPullback (PreservesProduct.iso F f).hom
apply Concrete.limit_ext _ (piComparison F _ x) (piComparison F _ y)
intro ⟨j⟩
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, piComparison_comp_π]
exact h j
end ProductExt
end Products
section Terminal
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves terminals and `X` is terminal, then `ToType X` is a
singleton. -/
noncomputable def uniqueOfTerminalOfPreserves [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : IsTerminal X) : Unique (ToType X) :=
Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X) <| IsTerminal.isTerminalObj (forget C) X h
/-- If `forget C` reflects terminals and `ToType X` is a singleton, then `X` is terminal. -/
noncomputable def terminalOfUniqueOfReflects [ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
(X : C) (h : Unique (ToType X)) : IsTerminal X :=
IsTerminal.isTerminalOfObj (forget C) X <| (Types.isTerminalEquivUnique (ToType X)).symm h
/-- The equivalence `IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X)` if the forgetful functor
preserves and reflects terminals. -/
noncomputable def terminalIffUnique [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
IsTerminal X ≃ Unique (ToType X) :=
(IsTerminal.isTerminalIffObj (forget C) X).trans <| Types.isTerminalEquivUnique _
variable (C)
variable [HasTerminal C] [PreservesLimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit` when `C` is a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def terminalEquiv : ToType (⊤_ C) ≃ PUnit :=
(PreservesTerminal.iso (forget C) ≪≫ Types.terminalIso).toEquiv
noncomputable instance : Unique (ToType (⊤_ C)) where
default := (terminalEquiv C).symm PUnit.unit
uniq _ := (terminalEquiv C).injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end Terminal
section Initial
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC]
/-- If `forget C` preserves initials and `X` is initial, then `ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma empty_of_initial_of_preserves [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : Nonempty (IsInitial X)) : IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty]
exact Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialObj (forget C) _) h
/-- If `forget C` reflects initials and `ToType X` is empty, then `X` is initial. -/
lemma initial_of_empty_of_reflects [ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C)
(h : IsEmpty (ToType X)) : Nonempty (IsInitial X) :=
Nonempty.map (IsInitial.isInitialOfObj (forget C) _) <|
(Types.initial_iff_empty (ToType X)).mpr h
/-- If `forget C` preserves and reflects initials, then `X` is initial if and only if
`ToType X` is empty. -/
lemma initial_iff_empty_of_preserves_of_reflects [PreservesColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)]
[ReflectsColimit (Functor.empty.{0} C) (forget C)] (X : C) :
Nonempty (IsInitial X) ↔ IsEmpty (ToType X) := by
rw [← Types.initial_iff_empty, (IsInitial.isInitialIffObj (forget C) X).nonempty_congr]
rfl
end Initial
section BinaryProducts
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type w} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{w} C FC] (X₁ X₂ : C) [HasBinaryProduct X₁ X₂]
[PreservesLimit (pair X₁ X₂) (forget C)]
/-- The equivalence `ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ (ToType X₁) × (ToType X₂)`
if `X₁` and `X₂` are objects in a concrete category `C`. -/
noncomputable def prodEquiv : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂) ≃ ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ :=
(PreservesLimitPair.iso (forget C) X₁ X₂ ≪≫ Types.binaryProductIso _ _).toEquiv
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_fst (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).fst = (Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_fst (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_apply_snd (x : ToType (X₁ ⨯ X₂)) :
(prodEquiv X₁ X₂ x).snd = (Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) x :=
congr_fun (prodComparison_snd (forget C) X₁ X₂) x
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_fst (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.fst : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₁) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.1 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
@[simp]
lemma prodEquiv_symm_apply_snd (x : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂) :
(Limits.prod.snd : X₁ ⨯ X₂ ⟶ X₂) ((prodEquiv X₁ X₂).symm x) = x.2 := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (prodEquiv X₁ X₂).surjective x
simp
end BinaryProducts
section Pullbacks
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
variable {X₁ X₂ S : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S)
[HasPullback f₁ f₂] [PreservesLimit (cospan f₁ f₂) (forget C)]
/-- In a concrete category `C`, given two morphisms `f₁ : X₁ ⟶ S` and `f₂ : X₂ ⟶ S`,
the elements in `pullback f₁ f₁` can be identified to compatible tuples of
elements in `X₁` and `X₂`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackEquiv :
ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) ≃ { p : ToType X₁ × ToType X₂ // f₁ p.1 = f₂ p.2 } :=
(PreservesPullback.iso (forget C) f₁ f₂ ≪≫
Types.pullbackIsoPullback ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁) ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)).toEquiv
/-- Constructor for elements in a pullback in a concrete category. -/
noncomputable def pullbackMk (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
ToType (pullback f₁ f₂) :=
(pullbackEquiv f₁ f₂).symm ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, h⟩
lemma pullbackMk_surjective (x : ToType (pullback f₁ f₂)) :
∃ (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂), x = pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, h⟩, rfl⟩ := (pullbackEquiv f₁ f₂).symm.surjective x
exact ⟨x₁, x₂, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma pullbackMk_fst (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
pullback.fst f₁ f₂ (pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h) = x₁ :=
(congr_fun (PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst (forget C) f₁ f₂) _).trans
(congr_fun (Types.pullbackIsoPullback_inv_fst ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁)
⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)) _)
@[simp]
lemma pullbackMk_snd (x₁ : ToType X₁) (x₂ : ToType X₂) (h : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂) :
pullback.snd f₁ f₂ (pullbackMk f₁ f₂ x₁ x₂ h) = x₂ :=
(congr_fun (PreservesPullback.iso_inv_snd (forget C) f₁ f₂) _).trans
(congr_fun (Types.pullbackIsoPullback_inv_snd ⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₁)
⇑(ConcreteCategory.hom f₂)) _)
end Pullbacks
section WidePullback
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type (max v w)} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max v w} C FC]
open WidePullback
open WidePullbackShape
theorem widePullback_ext {B : C} {ι : Type w} {X : ι → C} (f : ∀ j : ι, X j ⟶ B)
[HasWidePullback B X f] [PreservesLimit (wideCospan B X f) (forget C)]
(x y : ToType (widePullback B X f)) (h₀ : base f x = base f y) (h : ∀ j, π f j x = π f j y) :
x = y := by
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | j)
· exact h₀
· apply h
theorem widePullback_ext' {B : C} {ι : Type w} [Nonempty ι] {X : ι → C}
(f : ∀ j : ι, X j ⟶ B) [HasWidePullback.{w} B X f]
[PreservesLimit (wideCospan B X f) (forget C)] (x y : ToType (widePullback B X f))
(h : ∀ j, π f j x = π f j y) : x = y := by
apply Concrete.widePullback_ext _ _ _ _ h
inhabit ι
simp only [← π_arrow f default, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, h]
end WidePullback
section Multiequalizer
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type (max w w' v)} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max w w' v} C FC]
theorem multiequalizer_ext {J : MulticospanShape.{w, w'}}
{I : MulticospanIndex J C} [HasMultiequalizer I]
[PreservesLimit I.multicospan (forget C)] (x y : ToType (multiequalizer I))
(h : ∀ t : J.L, Multiequalizer.ι I t x = Multiequalizer.ι I t y) : x = y := by
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (a | b)
· apply h
· rw [← limit.w I.multicospan (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b), ConcreteCategory.comp_apply,
ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
simp [h]
/-- An auxiliary equivalence to be used in `multiequalizerEquiv` below. -/
def multiequalizerEquivAux {J : MulticospanShape.{w, w'}} (I : MulticospanIndex J C) :
(I.multicospan ⋙ forget C).sections ≃
{ x : ∀ i : J.L, ToType (I.left i) // ∀ i : J.R, I.fst i (x _) = I.snd i (x _) } where
toFun x :=
⟨fun _ => x.1 (WalkingMulticospan.left _), fun i => by
have a := x.2 (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst i)
have b := x.2 (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.snd i)
rw [← b] at a
exact a⟩
invFun x :=
{ val := fun j =>
match j with
| WalkingMulticospan.left _ => x.1 _
| WalkingMulticospan.right b => I.fst b (x.1 _)
property := by
rintro (a | b) (a' | b') (f | f | f)
· simp
· rfl
· dsimp
exact (x.2 b').symm
· simp }
left_inv := by
intro x; ext (a | b)
· rfl
· rw [← x.2 (WalkingMulticospan.Hom.fst b)]
rfl
right_inv := by
intro x
ext i
rfl
/-- The equivalence between the noncomputable multiequalizer and
the concrete multiequalizer. -/
noncomputable def multiequalizerEquiv {J : MulticospanShape.{w, w'}}
(I : MulticospanIndex J C) [HasMultiequalizer I]
[PreservesLimit I.multicospan (forget C)] :
ToType (multiequalizer I) ≃
{ x : ∀ i : J.L, ToType (I.left i) // ∀ i : J.R, I.fst i (x _) = I.snd i (x _) } :=
letI h1 := limit.isLimit I.multicospan
letI h2 := isLimitOfPreserves (forget C) h1
letI E := h2.conePointUniqueUpToIso (Types.limitConeIsLimit.{max w w', v} _)
Equiv.trans E.toEquiv (Concrete.multiequalizerEquivAux I)
@[simp]
theorem multiequalizerEquiv_apply {J : MulticospanShape.{w, w'}}
(I : MulticospanIndex J C) [HasMultiequalizer I]
[PreservesLimit I.multicospan (forget C)] (x : ToType (multiequalizer I)) (i : J.L) :
((Concrete.multiequalizerEquiv I) x : ∀ i : J.L, ToType (I.left i)) i =
Multiequalizer.ι I i x :=
rfl
end Multiequalizer
section WidePushout
open WidePushout
open WidePushoutShape
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type v} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
variable [ConcreteCategory.{v} C FC]
theorem widePushout_exists_rep {B : C} {α : Type _} {X : α → C} (f : ∀ j : α, B ⟶ X j)
[HasWidePushout.{v} B X f] [PreservesColimit (wideSpan B X f) (forget C)]
(x : ToType (widePushout B X f)) :
(∃ y : ToType B, head f y = x) ∨ ∃ (i : α) (y : ToType (X i)), ι f i y = x := by
obtain ⟨_ | j, y, rfl⟩ := Concrete.colimit_exists_rep _ x
| · left
use y
rfl
· right
use j, y
rfl
theorem widePushout_exists_rep' {B : C} {α : Type _} [Nonempty α] {X : α → C}
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ConcreteCategory.lean | 338 | 345 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# The `abel` tactic
Evaluate expressions in the language of additive, commutative monoids and groups.
-/
-- TODO: assert_not_exists NonUnitalNonAssociativeSemiring
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid TopologicalSpace PseudoMetricSpace
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
open Lean Elab Meta Tactic Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `abel
initialize registerTraceClass `abel.detail
/--
Tactic for evaluating equations in the language of
*additive*, commutative monoids and groups.
`abel` and its variants work as both tactics and conv tactics.
* `abel1` fails if the target is not an equality that is provable by the axioms of
commutative monoids/groups.
* `abel_nf` rewrites all group expressions into a normal form.
* In tactic mode, `abel_nf at h` can be used to rewrite in a hypothesis.
* `abel_nf (config := cfg)` allows for additional configuration:
* `red`: the reducibility setting (overridden by `!`)
* `zetaDelta`: if true, local let variables can be unfolded (overridden by `!`)
* `recursive`: if true, `abel_nf` will also recurse into atoms
* `abel!`, `abel1!`, `abel_nf!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting to identify atoms.
For example:
```
example [AddCommMonoid α] (a b : α) : a + (b + a) = a + a + b := by abel
example [AddCommGroup α] (a : α) : (3 : ℤ) • a = a + (2 : ℤ) • a := by abel
```
## Future work
* In mathlib 3, `abel` accepted additional optional arguments:
```
syntax "abel" (&" raw" <|> &" term")? (location)? : tactic
```
It is undecided whether these features should be restored eventually.
-/
syntax (name := abel) "abel" "!"? : tactic
/-- The `Context` for a call to `abel`.
Stores a few options for this call, and caches some common subexpressions
such as typeclass instances and `0 : α`.
-/
structure Context where
/-- The type of the ambient additive commutative group or monoid. -/
α : Expr
/-- The universe level for `α`. -/
univ : Level
/-- The expression representing `0 : α`. -/
α0 : Expr
/-- Specify whether we are in an additive commutative group or an additive commutative monoid. -/
isGroup : Bool
/-- The `AddCommGroup α` or `AddCommMonoid α` expression. -/
inst : Expr
/-- Populate a `context` object for evaluating `e`. -/
def mkContext (e : Expr) : MetaM Context := do
let α ← inferType e
let c ← synthInstance (← mkAppM ``AddCommMonoid #[α])
let cg ← synthInstance? (← mkAppM ``AddCommGroup #[α])
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
_ ← isDefEq (.sort (.succ u)) (← inferType α)
let α0 ← Expr.ofNat α 0
match cg with
| some cg => return ⟨α, u, α0, true, cg⟩
| _ => return ⟨α, u, α0, false, c⟩
/-- The monad for `Abel` contains, in addition to the `AtomM` state,
some information about the current type we are working over, so that we can consistently
use group lemmas or monoid lemmas as appropriate. -/
abbrev M := ReaderT Context AtomM
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst : AddWhatever α], _` to the
implicit parameters in the context, and the given list of arguments. -/
def Context.app (c : Context) (n : Name) (inst : Expr) : Array Expr → Expr :=
mkAppN (((@Expr.const n [c.univ]).app c.α).app inst)
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst α], _` to the implicit parameters in the
context, and the given list of arguments.
Compared to `context.app`, this takes the name of the typeclass, rather than an
inferred typeclass instance.
-/
def Context.mkApp (c : Context) (n inst : Name) (l : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
return c.app n (← synthInstance ((Expr.const inst [c.univ]).app c.α)) l
/-- Add the letter "g" to the end of the name, e.g. turning `term` into `termg`.
This is used to choose between declarations taking `AddCommMonoid` and those
taking `AddCommGroup` instances.
-/
def addG : Name → Name
| .str p s => .str p (s ++ "g")
| n => n
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [AddComm{Monoid,Group} α]` to the given list of arguments.
Will use the `AddComm{Monoid,Group}` instance that has been cached in the context.
-/
def iapp (n : Name) (xs : Array Expr) : M Expr := do
let c ← read
return c.app (if c.isGroup then addG n else n) c.inst xs
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative monoid. -/
def term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative group. -/
def termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n : ℤ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- Evaluate a term with coefficient `n`, atom `x` and successor terms `a`. -/
def mkTerm (n x a : Expr) : M Expr := iapp ``term #[n, x, a]
/-- Interpret an integer as a coefficient to a term. -/
def intToExpr (n : ℤ) : M Expr := do
Expr.ofInt (mkConst (if (← read).isGroup then ``Int else ``Nat) []) n
/-- A normal form for `abel`.
Expressions are represented as a list of terms of the form `e = n • x`,
where `n : ℤ` and `x` is an arbitrary element of the additive commutative monoid or group.
We explicitly track the `Expr` forms of `e` and `n`, even though they could be reconstructed,
for efficiency. -/
inductive NormalExpr : Type
| zero (e : Expr) : NormalExpr
| nterm (e : Expr) (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : NormalExpr
deriving Inhabited
/-- Extract the expression from a normal form. -/
def NormalExpr.e : NormalExpr → Expr
| .zero e => e
| .nterm e .. => e
instance : Coe NormalExpr Expr where coe := NormalExpr.e
/-- Construct the normal form representing a single term. -/
def NormalExpr.term' (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : M NormalExpr :=
return .nterm (← mkTerm n.1 x.2 a) n x a
/-- Construct the normal form representing zero. -/
def NormalExpr.zero' : M NormalExpr := return NormalExpr.zero (← read).α0
open NormalExpr
theorem const_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @term α _ n x a = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem const_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @termg α _ n x a = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_const {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@term α _ n x a + k = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_constg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@termg α _ n x a + k = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a') (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n')
(h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') : @term α _ n₁ x a₁ + @term α _ n₂ x a₂ = term n' x a' := by
simp [h₁.symm, h₂.symm, term, add_nsmul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem term_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a')
(h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
@termg α _ n₁ x a₁ + @termg α _ n₂ x a₂ = termg n' x a' := by
simp only [termg, h₁.symm, add_zsmul, h₂.symm]
exact add_add_add_comm (n₁ • x) a₁ (n₂ • x) a₂
theorem zero_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (x a) : @term α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [term, zero_nsmul, one_nsmul]
theorem zero_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (x a) : @termg α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [termg, zero_zsmul]
|
/--
Interpret the sum of two expressions in `abel`'s normal form.
| Mathlib/Tactic/Abel.lean | 193 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas about `List`s and `Set.range`
In this file we prove lemmas about range of some operations on lists.
-/
open List
variable {α β : Type*} (l : List α)
namespace Set
theorem range_list_map (f : α → β) : range (map f) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ range f } := by
refine antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 fun l => forall_mem_map.2 fun y _ => mem_range_self _)
fun l hl => ?_
induction l with
| nil => exact ⟨[], rfl⟩
| cons a l ihl =>
rcases ihl fun x hx => hl x <| subset_cons_self _ _ hx with ⟨l, rfl⟩
rcases hl a mem_cons_self with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: l, map_cons⟩
theorem range_list_map_coe (s : Set α) : range (map ((↑) : s → α)) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s } := by
rw [range_list_map, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem range_list_get : range l.get = { x | x ∈ l } := by
ext x
rw [mem_setOf_eq, mem_iff_get, mem_range]
theorem range_list_getElem? :
range (l[·]? : ℕ → Option α) = insert none (some '' { x | x ∈ l }) := by
rw [← range_list_get, ← range_comp]
refine (range_subset_iff.2 fun n => ?_).antisymm (insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· exact (le_or_lt l.length n).imp getElem?_eq_none_iff.mpr
(fun hlt => ⟨⟨_, hlt⟩, (getElem?_eq_getElem hlt).symm⟩)
· exact ⟨_, getElem?_eq_none_iff.mpr le_rfl⟩
· exact range_subset_iff.2 fun k => ⟨_, getElem?_eq_getElem _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias range_list_get? := range_list_getElem?
@[simp]
| theorem range_list_getD (d : α) : (range fun n : Nat => l[n]?.getD d) = insert d { x | x ∈ l } :=
calc
(range fun n => l[n]?.getD d) = (fun o : Option α => o.getD d) '' range (l[·]?) := by
simp only [← range_comp, Function.comp_def]
rfl
_ = insert d { x | x ∈ l } := by
| Mathlib/Data/Set/List.lean | 52 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
π.eq_of_le_of_le (π.biUnionIndex_mem this) hJ (π.le_biUnionIndex this) (le_of_mem _ hJ')
theorem biUnion_assoc (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (πi' : Box ι → ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion fun J => (πi J).biUnion (πi' J)) =
(π.biUnion πi).biUnion fun J => πi' (π.biUnionIndex πi J) J := by
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro ⟨J₁, hJ₁, J₂, hJ₂, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₂⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂]
· rintro ⟨J₁, ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₁⟩, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, hJ₂, J₁, hJ₁, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₂ hJ₁] at hJ
/-- Create a `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` from a collection of possibly empty boxes by filtering out
the empty one if it exists. -/
def ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.eraseNone boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
rw [mem_eraseNone] at hJ
simpa only [WithBot.some_eq_coe, WithBot.coe_le_coe] using le_of_mem _ hJ
pairwiseDisjoint J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne := by
simp only [mem_coe, mem_eraseNone] at h₁ h₂
exact Box.disjoint_coe.1 (pairwise_disjoint h₁ h₂ (mt Option.some_inj.1 hne))
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {h₁ h₂} :
J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ∈ boxes :=
mem_eraseNone
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
(ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, ↑J := by
suffices ⋃ (J : Box ι) (_ : ↑J ∈ boxes), ↑J = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) by
simpa [ofWithBot, Prepartition.iUnion]
simp only [← Box.biUnion_coe_eq_coe, @iUnion_comm _ _ (Box ι), @iUnion_comm _ _ (@Eq _ _ _),
iUnion_iUnion_eq_right]
theorem ofWithBot_le {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ ↑J') :
ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint ≤ π := by
have : ∀ J : Box ι, ↑J ∈ boxes → ∃ J' ∈ π, J ≤ J' := fun J hJ => by
simpa only [WithBot.coe_le_coe] using H J hJ WithBot.coe_ne_bot
simpa [ofWithBot, le_def]
theorem le_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ π, ∃ J' ∈ boxes, ↑J ≤ J') : π ≤ ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint := by
intro J hJ
rcases H J hJ with ⟨J', J'mem, hle⟩
lift J' to Box ι using ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot WithBot.coe_ne_bot hle
exact ⟨J', mem_ofWithBot.2 J'mem, WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 hle⟩
theorem ofWithBot_mono {boxes₁ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))}
{le_of_mem₁ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₁ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₁ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
{boxes₂ : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {le_of_mem₂ : ∀ J ∈ boxes₂, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I}
{pairwise_disjoint₂ : Set.Pairwise (boxes₂ : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint}
(H : ∀ J ∈ boxes₁, J ≠ ⊥ → ∃ J' ∈ boxes₂, J ≤ J') :
ofWithBot boxes₁ le_of_mem₁ pairwise_disjoint₁ ≤
ofWithBot boxes₂ le_of_mem₂ pairwise_disjoint₂ :=
le_ofWithBot _ fun J hJ => H J (mem_ofWithBot.1 hJ) WithBot.coe_ne_bot
theorem sum_ofWithBot {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ boxes, Option.elim' 0 f J :=
Finset.sum_eraseNone _ _
open scoped Classical in
/-- Restrict a prepartition to a box. -/
def restrict (π : Prepartition I) (J : Box ι) : Prepartition J :=
ofWithBot (π.boxes.image fun J' : Box ι => J ⊓ J')
(fun J' hJ' => by
rcases Finset.mem_image.1 hJ' with ⟨J', -, rfl⟩
exact inf_le_left)
(by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, onFun, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_image]
rintro _ ⟨J₁, h₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨J₂, h₂, rfl⟩ Hne
have : J₁ ≠ J₂ := by
rintro rfl
exact Hne rfl
exact ((Box.disjoint_coe.2 <| π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ this).inf_left' _).inf_right' _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : WithBot (Box ι)) = ↑J ⊓ ↑J' := by
simp [restrict, eq_comm]
| theorem mem_restrict' : J₁ ∈ π.restrict J ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑J ∩ ↑J' := by
simp only [mem_restrict, ← Box.withBotCoe_inj, Box.coe_inf, Box.coe_coe]
@[mono]
theorem restrict_mono {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} (Hle : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.restrict J ≤ π₂.restrict J := by
classical
refine ofWithBot_mono fun J₁ hJ₁ hne => ?_
rw [Finset.mem_image] at hJ₁; rcases hJ₁ with ⟨J₁, hJ₁, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 436 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Isometry
/-!
# Isometric equivalences with respect to quadratic forms
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv`: `LinearEquiv`s which map between two different quadratic forms
* `QuadraticForm.Equivalent`: propositional version of the above
## Main results
* `equivalent_weighted_sum_squares`: in finite dimensions, any quadratic form is equivalent to a
parametrization of `QuadraticForm.weightedSumSquares`.
-/
variable {ι R K M M₁ M₂ M₃ V N : Type*}
open QuadraticMap
namespace QuadraticMap
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid N]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R N]
/-- An isometric equivalence between two quadratic spaces `M₁, Q₁` and `M₂, Q₂` over a ring `R`,
is a linear equivalence between `M₁` and `M₂` that commutes with the quadratic forms. -/
structure IsometryEquiv (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ N) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ N)
extends M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ where
map_app' : ∀ m, Q₂ (toFun m) = Q₁ m
/-- Two quadratic forms over a ring `R` are equivalent
if there exists an isometric equivalence between them:
a linear equivalence that transforms one quadratic form into the other. -/
def Equivalent (Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ N) (Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ N) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂)
namespace IsometryEquiv
variable {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ N} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ N} {Q₃ : QuadraticMap R M₃ N}
instance : EquivLike (Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) M₁ M₂ where
coe f := f.toLinearEquiv
inv f := f.toLinearEquiv.symm
left_inv f := f.toLinearEquiv.left_inv
right_inv f := f.toLinearEquiv.right_inv
coe_injective' f g := by cases f; cases g; simp +contextual
instance : LinearEquivClass (Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) R M₁ M₂ where
map_add f := map_add f.toLinearEquiv
map_smulₛₗ f := map_smulₛₗ f.toLinearEquiv
-- Porting note: was `Coe`
instance : CoeOut (Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) (M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨IsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLinearEquiv (f : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) : ⇑(f : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_app (f : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) (m : M₁) : Q₂ (f m) = Q₁ m :=
f.map_app' m
/-- The identity isometric equivalence between a quadratic form and itself. -/
@[refl]
def refl (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : Q.IsometryEquiv Q :=
{ LinearEquiv.refl R M with map_app' := fun _ => rfl }
/-- The inverse isometric equivalence of an isometric equivalence between two quadratic forms. -/
@[symm]
def symm (f : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) : Q₂.IsometryEquiv Q₁ :=
{ (f : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂).symm with
map_app' := by intro m; rw [← f.map_app]; congr; exact f.toLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply m }
/-- The composition of two isometric equivalences between quadratic forms. -/
@[trans]
def trans (f : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) (g : Q₂.IsometryEquiv Q₃) : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₃ :=
{ (f : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂).trans (g : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) with
map_app' := by intro m; rw [← f.map_app, ← g.map_app]; rfl }
/-- Isometric equivalences are isometric maps -/
@[simps]
def toIsometry (g : Q₁.IsometryEquiv Q₂) : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂ where
toFun x := g x
__ := g
end IsometryEquiv
namespace Equivalent
variable {Q₁ : QuadraticMap R M₁ N} {Q₂ : QuadraticMap R M₂ N} {Q₃ : QuadraticMap R M₃ N}
@[refl]
theorem refl (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : Q.Equivalent Q :=
⟨IsometryEquiv.refl Q⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : Q₁.Equivalent Q₂) : Q₂.Equivalent Q₁ :=
h.elim fun f => ⟨f.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem trans (h : Q₁.Equivalent Q₂) (h' : Q₂.Equivalent Q₃) : Q₁.Equivalent Q₃ :=
h'.elim <| h.elim fun f g => ⟨f.trans g⟩
end Equivalent
/-- A quadratic form composed with a `LinearEquiv` is isometric to itself. -/
def isometryEquivOfCompLinearEquiv (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (f : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M) :
Q.IsometryEquiv (Q.comp (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M)) :=
{ f.symm with
map_app' := by
intro
simp only [comp_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, f.apply_symm_apply] }
variable [Finite ι]
/-- A quadratic form is isometrically equivalent to its bases representations. -/
noncomputable def isometryEquivBasisRepr (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (v : Basis ι R M) :
IsometryEquiv Q (Q.basisRepr v) :=
isometryEquivOfCompLinearEquiv Q v.equivFun.symm
end QuadraticMap
namespace QuadraticForm
variable [Field K] [Invertible (2 : K)] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- Given an orthogonal basis, a quadratic form is isometrically equivalent with a weighted sum of
squares. -/
noncomputable def isometryEquivWeightedSumSquares (Q : QuadraticForm K V)
(v : Basis (Fin (Module.finrank K V)) K V)
(hv₁ : (associated (R := K) Q).IsOrthoᵢ v) :
Q.IsometryEquiv (weightedSumSquares K fun i => Q (v i)) := by
let iso := Q.isometryEquivBasisRepr v
refine ⟨iso, fun m => ?_⟩
convert iso.map_app m
rw [basisRepr_eq_of_iIsOrtho _ _ hv₁]
variable [FiniteDimensional K V]
open LinearMap.BilinForm
theorem equivalent_weightedSumSquares (Q : QuadraticForm K V) :
∃ w : Fin (Module.finrank K V) → K, Equivalent Q (weightedSumSquares K w) :=
let ⟨v, hv₁⟩ := exists_orthogonal_basis (associated_isSymm _ Q)
⟨_, ⟨Q.isometryEquivWeightedSumSquares v hv₁⟩⟩
theorem equivalent_weightedSumSquares_units_of_nondegenerate' (Q : QuadraticForm K V)
(hQ : (associated (R := K) Q).SeparatingLeft) :
∃ w : Fin (Module.finrank K V) → Kˣ, Equivalent Q (weightedSumSquares K w) := by
obtain ⟨v, hv₁⟩ := exists_orthogonal_basis (associated_isSymm K Q)
have hv₂ := hv₁.not_isOrtho_basis_self_of_separatingLeft hQ
simp_rw [LinearMap.IsOrtho, associated_eq_self_apply] at hv₂
exact ⟨fun i => Units.mk0 _ (hv₂ i), ⟨Q.isometryEquivWeightedSumSquares v hv₁⟩⟩
end QuadraticForm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/IsometryEquiv.lean | 172 | 178 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Split polynomials
A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its
irreducible factors over `L` have degree `1`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Splits i f`: A predicate on a homomorphism `i : K →+* L` from a commutative ring to a
field and a polynomial `f` saying that `f.map i` is zero or all of its irreducible factors over
`L` have degree `1`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- A polynomial `Splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1. -/
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.orderSucc_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i ((degree_map_le.trans hf).antisymm hif)
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
theorem splits_pow {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (n : ℕ) : (f ^ n).Splits i := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact splits_prod i fun j _ => hf
theorem splits_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).Splits i :=
splits_pow i (splits_X i) n
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : K[X]} : (f.map i).Splits (RingHom.id L) ↔ f.Splits i := by
rw [splits_map_iff, RingHom.id_comp]
variable {i}
theorem Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i := by
by_cases hzero : map i (f.comp p) = 0
· exact Or.inl hzero
cases h with
| inl h0 =>
exact Or.inl <| map_comp i _ _ ▸ h0.symm ▸ zero_comp
| inr h =>
right
intro g irr dvd
rw [map_comp] at dvd hzero
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hd with
| inl hd =>
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (Nat.WithBot.lt_one_iff_le_zero.mp hd), comp_C] at dvd hzero
refine False.elim (irr.1 (isUnit_of_dvd_unit dvd ?_))
simpa using hzero
| inr hd =>
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr
(ne_zero_of_degree_gt (n := ⊥) (by rw [hd]; decide)))
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hd, dvd_comp_C_mul_X_add_C_iff _ _] at dvd
have := h (irr.map (algEquivCMulXAddC _ _).symm) dvd
rw [degree_eq_natDegree irr.ne_zero]
rwa [algEquivCMulXAddC_symm_apply, ← comp_eq_aeval,
degree_eq_natDegree (fun h => WithBot.bot_ne_one (h ▸ this)),
natDegree_comp, natDegree_C_mul (invertibleInvOf.ne_zero),
natDegree_X_sub_C, mul_one] at this
theorem splits_iff_comp_splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree = 1) :
f.Splits i ↔ (f.comp p).Splits i := by
rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, ← splits_id_iff_splits (f := f.comp p), map_comp]
refine ⟨fun h => Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one
(le_of_eq (map_id (R := L) ▸ hd)) h, fun h => ?_⟩
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr
(ne_zero_of_degree_gt (n := ⊥) (by rw [hd]; decide)))
have : (map i f) = ((map i f).comp (map i p)).comp ((C ⅟ (map i p).leadingCoeff *
(X - C ((map i p).coeff 0)))) := by
rw [comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hd]
simp only [coeff_map, invOf_eq_inv, mul_sub, ← C_mul, add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp,
← mul_assoc]
simp
refine this ▸ Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one ?_ h
simp [degree_C (inv_ne_zero (Invertible.ne_zero (a := (map i p).leadingCoeff)))]
/--
This is a weaker variant of `Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one`,
but its conditions are easier to check.
-/
theorem Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : p.degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one (degree_map_le.trans hd) h
theorem Splits.comp_X_sub_C (a : K) {f : K[X]}
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (X - C a)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (degree_X_sub_C_le _) h
theorem Splits.comp_X_add_C (a : K) {f : K[X]}
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (X + C a)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (by simpa using degree_X_sub_C_le (-a)) h
theorem Splits.comp_neg_X {f : K[X]} (h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (-X)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (by simpa using degree_X_sub_C_le (0 : K)) h
variable (i)
theorem exists_root_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : degree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if hf0' : f.map i = 0 then by simp [eval₂_eq_eval_map, hf0']
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬IsUnit (f.map i) from mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hf0) hf0'
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0' hg.1 hg.2)
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _ from hx, zero_mul]⟩
theorem roots_ne_zero_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : natDegree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
(f.map i).roots ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_splits' i hs fun h => hf0 <| natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h
fun h => by
rw [← eval_map] at hx
have : f.map i ≠ 0 := by intro; simp_all
cases h.subst ((mem_roots this).2 hx)
/-- Pick a root of a polynomial that splits. See `rootOfSplits` for polynomials over a field
which has simpler assumptions. -/
def rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd : (f.map i).degree ≠ 0) : L :=
Classical.choose <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
theorem map_rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd) :
f.eval₂ i (rootOfSplits' i hf hfd) = 0 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
theorem natDegree_eq_card_roots' {p : K[X]} {i : K →+* L} (hsplit : Splits i p) :
(p.map i).natDegree = Multiset.card (p.map i).roots := by
by_cases hp : p.map i = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, roots_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
obtain ⟨q, he, hd, hr⟩ := exists_prod_multiset_X_sub_C_mul (p.map i)
rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, ← he] at hsplit
rw [← he] at hp
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun h => hp (by rw [h, mul_zero])
rw [← hd, add_eq_left]
by_contra h
have h' : (map (RingHom.id L) q).natDegree ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
have := roots_ne_zero_of_splits' (RingHom.id L) (splits_of_splits_mul' _ ?_ hsplit).2 h'
· rw [map_id] at this
exact this hr
· rw [map_id]
exact mul_ne_zero (monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C _).ne_zero hq
theorem degree_eq_card_roots' {p : K[X]} {i : K →+* L} (p_ne_zero : p.map i ≠ 0)
(hsplit : Splits i p) : (p.map i).degree = Multiset.card (p.map i).roots := by
simp [degree_eq_natDegree p_ne_zero, natDegree_eq_card_roots' hsplit]
end CommRing
theorem aeval_root_of_mapAlg_eq_multiset_prod_X_sub_C [CommSemiring R] [CommRing L] [Algebra R L]
(s : Multiset L) {x : L} (hx : x ∈ s) {p : R[X]}
(hp : mapAlg R L p = (Multiset.map (fun a : L ↦ X - C a) s).prod) : aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [← aeval_map_algebraMap L, ← mapAlg_eq_map, hp, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.prod_eq_zero]
rw [Multiset.map_map, Multiset.mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, by simp⟩
variable [CommRing R] [Field K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- This lemma is for polynomials over a field. -/
theorem splits_iff (f : K[X]) :
Splits i f ↔ f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1 := by
rw [Splits, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
/-- This lemma is for polynomials over a field. -/
theorem Splits.def {i : K →+* L} {f : K[X]} (h : Splits i f) :
f = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1 :=
(splits_iff i f).mp h
theorem splits_of_splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hfg : f * g ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
splits_of_splits_mul' i (map_ne_zero hfg) h
theorem splits_of_splits_of_dvd {f g : K[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0) (hf : Splits i f) (hgf : g ∣ f) :
Splits i g := by
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := hgf
exact (splits_of_splits_mul i hf0 hf).1
theorem splits_of_splits_gcd_left [DecidableEq K] {f g : K[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0) (hf : Splits i f) :
Splits i (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g) :=
Polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd i hf0 hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
theorem splits_of_splits_gcd_right [DecidableEq K] {f g : K[X]} (hg0 : g ≠ 0) (hg : Splits i g) :
Splits i (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g) :=
Polynomial.splits_of_splits_of_dvd i hg0 hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
theorem splits_mul_iff {f g : K[X]} (hf : f ≠ 0) (hg : g ≠ 0) :
(f * g).Splits i ↔ f.Splits i ∧ g.Splits i :=
⟨splits_of_splits_mul i (mul_ne_zero hf hg), fun ⟨hfs, hgs⟩ => splits_mul i hfs hgs⟩
theorem splits_prod_iff {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, s j ≠ 0) → ((∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i ↔ ∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) := by
classical
refine
Finset.induction_on t (fun _ =>
⟨fun _ _ h => by simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty] at h, fun _ => splits_one i⟩)
fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht ⊢
rw [Finset.prod_insert hat, splits_mul_iff i ht.1 (Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 ht.2), ih ht.2]
theorem degree_eq_one_of_irreducible_of_splits {p : K[X]} (hp : Irreducible p)
(hp_splits : Splits (RingHom.id K) p) : p.degree = 1 := by
rcases hp_splits with ⟨⟩ | hp_splits
· exfalso
simp_all
· apply hp_splits hp
simp
theorem exists_root_of_splits {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : degree f ≠ 0) :
| ∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
exists_root_of_splits' i hs ((f.degree_map i).symm ▸ hf0)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 319 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
|
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 220 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 196 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| compl u hu ihu =>
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at ihu ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← ihu,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at ihf ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, ihf]
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
open scoped Interval in
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
open scoped Interval in
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
-- note that we cannot use `ae_restrict_iff` since we do not require measurability
refine hfg.filter_mono ?_
rw [Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous]
exact Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
(ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 (Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _ => id)
theorem ae_restrict_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
ae_restrict_mem₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_restrict_of_forall_mem {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
(ae_restrict_mem hs).mono h
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self)
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset {s t : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono <| Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ))
theorem ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl (t : Set α) {p : α → Prop}
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) (htc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict tᶜ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <|
calc
μ { x | ¬p x } ≤ μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ t) + μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ tᶜ) :=
measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict t { x | ¬p x } + μ.restrict tᶜ { x | ¬p x } :=
add_le_add (le_restrict_apply _ _) (le_restrict_apply _ _)
_ = 0 := by rw [ae_iff.1 ht, ae_iff.1 htc, zero_add]
theorem mem_map_restrict_ae_iff {β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map f (ae (μ.restrict s)) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply' hs]
theorem ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_comp' {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') (h2 : μ.map f ≪ ν) : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).mono_right h2.ae_le h
theorem Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf.aemeasurable h hf.absolutelyContinuous
theorem ae_eq_comp {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : g =ᵐ[μ.map f] g') :
g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf h AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ae_eq_one {β} [Group β] (f g : α → β) : f / g =ᵐ[μ] 1 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one] at hx
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive sub_nonneg_ae]
lemma one_le_div_ae {β : Type*} [Group β] [LE β] [MulRightMono β] (f g : α → β) :
1 ≤ᵐ[μ] g / f ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div'] at ha
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div']
theorem le_ae_restrict : ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ ae (μ.restrict s) := fun _s hs =>
eventually_inf_principal.2 (ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hs)
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ae (μ.restrict s) = ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext t
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_setOf,
Classical.not_imp, fun a => and_comm (a := a ∈ s) (b := ¬a ∈ t)]
rfl
lemma ae_restrict_le : ae (μ.restrict s) ≤ ae μ :=
ae_mono restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : ae (μ.restrict s) = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans restrict_eq_zero
theorem ae_restrict_neBot {s} : (ae <| μ.restrict s).NeBot ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans ae_restrict_eq_bot.not
theorem self_mem_ae_restrict {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (μ.restrict s) := by
simp only [ae_restrict_eq hs, exists_prop, mem_principal, mem_inf_iff]
exact ⟨_, univ_mem, s, Subset.rfl, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_congr_set {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x :=
⟨ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst, ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst.symm⟩
lemma NullMeasurable.measure_preimage_eq_measure_restrict_preimage_of_ae_compl_eq_const
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {b : β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(f_mble : NullMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hs : f =ᵐ[Measure.restrict μ sᶜ] (fun _ ↦ b))
{t : Set β} (t_mble : MeasurableSet t) (ht : b ∉ t) :
μ (f ⁻¹' t) = μ.restrict s (f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀ (f_mble t_mble)]
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply₀] at hs
· apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono inter_subset_left)
apply (measure_mono (Eq.symm (inter_union_compl (f ⁻¹' t) s)).le).trans
apply (measure_union_le _ _).trans
have obs : μ ((f ⁻¹' t) ∩ sᶜ) = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← hs]
apply measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ _)
intro x hx hfx
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_setOf_eq] at hx hfx
exact ht (hfx ▸ hx)
simp only [obs, add_zero, le_refl]
· exact NullMeasurableSet.of_null hs
namespace Measure
section Subtype
/-! ### Subtype of a measure space -/
section ComapAnyMeasure
theorem MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ := by
rw [Subtype.instMeasurableSpace, comap_eq_generateFrom] at ht
induction t, ht using generateFrom_induction with
| hC t' ht' =>
obtain ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩ := ht'
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter (hs'.nullMeasurableSet)
| empty => simp only [image_empty, nullMeasurableSet_empty]
| compl t' _ ht' =>
simp only [← range_diff_image Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
exact hs.diff ht'
| iUnion f _ hf =>
dsimp only []
rw [image_iUnion]
exact .iUnion hf
theorem NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.comap Subtype.val)) : NullMeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) μ :=
NullMeasurableSet.image _ μ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun _ => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) ht
theorem measure_subtype_coe_le_comap (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set s) :
μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) ≤ μ.comap Subtype.val t :=
le_comap_apply _ _ Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) _
theorem measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) {t : Set s}
(ht : μ.comap Subtype.val t = 0) : μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| (measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hs t).trans ht.le
end ComapAnyMeasure
section MeasureSpace
variable {u : Set δ} [MeasureSpace δ] {p : δ → Prop}
/-- In a measure space, one can restrict the measure to a subtype to get a new measure space.
Not registered as an instance, as there are other natural choices such as the normalized restriction
for a probability measure, or the subspace measure when restricting to a vector subspace. Enable
locally if needed with `attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace`. -/
noncomputable def Subtype.measureSpace : MeasureSpace (Subtype p) where
volume := Measure.comap Subtype.val volume
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem Subtype.volume_def : (volume : Measure u) = volume.comap Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem Subtype.volume_univ (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) : volume (univ : Set u) = volume u := by
rw [Subtype.volume_def, comap_apply₀ _ _ _ _ MeasurableSet.univ.nullMeasurableSet]
· congr
simp only [image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
· exact fun t => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hu
theorem volume_subtype_coe_le_volume (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) (t : Set u) :
volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) ≤ volume t :=
measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hu t
theorem volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) {t : Set u}
(ht : volume t = 0) : volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) = 0 :=
measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero hu ht
end MeasureSpace
end Subtype
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory Measure
namespace MeasurableEmbedding
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m1 : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
section
variable (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
include hf
theorem map_comap (μ : Measure β) : (comap f μ).map f = μ.restrict (range f) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [hf.map_apply, comap_apply f hf.injective hf.measurableSet_image' _ (hf.measurable ht),
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
theorem comap_apply (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
calc
comap f μ s = comap f μ (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := by rw [hf.injective.preimage_image]
_ = (comap f μ).map f (f '' s) := (hf.map_apply _ _).symm
_ = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset_range _ _)]
theorem comap_map (μ : Measure α) : (map f μ).comap f = μ := by
ext t _
rw [hf.comap_apply, hf.map_apply, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem ae_map_iff {p : β → Prop} {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) := by
simp only [ae_iff, hf.map_apply, preimage_setOf_eq]
theorem restrict_map (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
Measure.ext fun t ht => by simp [hf.map_apply, ht, hf.measurable ht]
protected theorem comap_preimage (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.map_apply, hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range]
lemma comap_restrict (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).comap f = (μ.comap f).restrict (f ⁻¹' s) := by
ext t ht
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, comap_apply hf, comap_apply hf,
Measure.restrict_apply (hf.measurableSet_image.2 ht), image_inter_preimage]
lemma restrict_comap (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) :
(μ.comap f).restrict s = (μ.restrict (f '' s)).comap f := by
rw [comap_restrict hf, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
end
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map e).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| e ⁻¹' s).map e :=
e.measurableEmbedding.restrict_map _ _
end MeasurableEmbedding
section Subtype
theorem comap_subtype_coe_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) (t : Set s) : comap (↑) μ t = μ ((↑) '' t) :=
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).comap_apply _ _
theorem map_comap_subtype_coe {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) : (comap (↑) μ).map ((↑) : s → α) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem ae_restrict_iff_subtype {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ (x : s) ∂comap ((↑) : s → α) μ, p x := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).ae_map_iff]
variable [MeasureSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-!
### Volume on `s : Set α`
Note the instance is provided earlier as `Subtype.measureSpace`.
-/
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem volume_set_coe_def (s : Set α) : (volume : Measure s) = comap ((↑) : s → α) volume :=
rfl
theorem MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
volume.map ((↑) : s → α) = restrict volume s := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap volume, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem volume_image_subtype_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) :
volume ((↑) '' t : Set α) = volume t :=
(comap_subtype_coe_apply hs volume t).symm
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_coe (hs : NullMeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
volume (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = volume (t ∩ s) := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def,
comap_apply₀ _ _ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun h => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs)
(measurable_subtype_coe ht).nullMeasurableSet,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
end Subtype
section Piecewise
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f g : α → β}
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs]
exact (piecewise_eqOn s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl]
exact (piecewise_eqOn_compl s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)]
(hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.piecewise f g =ᵐ[μ] t.piecewise f g :=
hst.mem_iff.mono fun x hx => by simp [piecewise, hx]
end Piecewise
section IndicatorFunction
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem [Zero β] {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∈ t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ t ∈ Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) := by
classical
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite]
simp_rw [Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0
simp only [ht, ← Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, compl_compl, Set.compl_union, if_true,
Set.preimage_const]
simp_rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right, Set.compl_inter_self s, Set.union_empty]
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem [Zero β] {t : Set β} (ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0 := by
classical
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite, Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0
simp only [ht, if_false, Set.compl_empty, Set.empty_diff, Set.inter_univ, Set.preimage_const]
theorem map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae [Zero β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) ≤ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) := by
intro t
by_cases ht : (0 : β) ∈ t
· rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem ht hs]
exact id
rw [mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem ht, mem_map_restrict_ae_iff hs]
exact fun h => measure_mono_null (Set.inter_subset_left.trans Set.subset_union_left) h
variable [Zero β]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
indicator s f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] f := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs.compl] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hx hxs, Pi.zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_zero_of_restrict_ae_eq_zero (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs] at hf
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hxs, hx hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp [hx, hxs]
theorem indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator f := by
classical exact piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hst
theorem indicator_meas_zero (hs : μ s = 0) : indicator s f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
indicator_empty' f ▸ indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set (ae_eq_empty.2 hs)
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iff_indicator_ae_eq {g : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g ↔ s.indicator f =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator g := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff' hs]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> filter_upwards [h] with x hx
· by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp [hxs, hx hxs]
· simp [hxs]
· intro hxs
simpa [hxs] using hx
end IndicatorFunction
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 1,067 | 1,073 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.NoZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-! # Formal power series - Inverses
If the constant coefficient of a formal (univariate) power series is invertible,
then this formal power series is invertible.
(See the discussion in `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` for
the construction.)
Formal (univariate) power series over a local ring form a local ring.
Formal (univariate) power series over a field form a discrete valuation ring, and a normalization
monoid. The definition `residueFieldOfPowerSeries` provides the isomorphism between the residue
field of `k⟦X⟧` and `k`, when `k` is a field.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Auxiliary function used for computing inverse of a power series -/
protected def inv.aux : R → R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.inv.aux
theorem coeff_inv_aux (n : ℕ) (a : R) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) =
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 := by
rw [coeff, inv.aux, MvPowerSeries.coeff_inv_aux]
simp only [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
split_ifs; · rfl
congr 1
symm
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun (a, b) ↦ (single () a, single () b))
fun (f, g) ↦ (f (), g ())
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _hij
obtain H | H := le_or_lt n j
· aesop
rw [if_pos H, if_pos]
· rfl
refine ⟨?_, fun hh ↦ H.not_le ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟩
simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using le_of_lt H
· simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using hh ()
/-- A formal power series is invertible if the constant coefficient is invertible. -/
def invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit φ u
theorem coeff_invOfUnit (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
coeff R n (invOfUnit φ u) =
if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹
else
-↑u⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (invOfUnit φ u) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹ : R) φ
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
constantCoeff R (invOfUnit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invOfUnit, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff R φ = u) :
φ * invOfUnit φ u = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_invOfUnit φ u <| h
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_mul (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) (h : constantCoeff R φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u * φ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_mul φ u h
theorem isUnit_iff_constantCoeff {φ : R⟦X⟧} :
IsUnit φ ↔ IsUnit (constantCoeff R φ) :=
MvPowerSeries.isUnit_iff_constantCoeff
/-- Two ways of removing the constant coefficient of a power series are the same. -/
theorem sub_const_eq_shift_mul_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ - C R (constantCoeff R φ) = (mk fun p ↦ coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_shift_mul_X_add_const φ)
theorem sub_const_eq_X_mul_shift (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ - C R (constantCoeff R φ) = X * mk fun p ↦ coeff R (p + 1) φ :=
sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr (eq_X_mul_shift_add_const φ)
end Ring
section Field
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
/-- The inverse 1/f of a power series f defined over a field -/
protected def inv : k⟦X⟧ → k⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.inv
instance : Inv k⟦X⟧ := ⟨PowerSeries.inv⟩
theorem inv_eq_inv_aux (φ : k⟦X⟧) : φ⁻¹ = inv.aux (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ φ :=
rfl
theorem coeff_inv (n) (φ : k⟦X⟧) :
coeff k n φ⁻¹ =
if n = 0 then (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹
else
-(constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff k x.1 φ * coeff k x.2 φ⁻¹ else 0 := by
rw [inv_eq_inv_aux, coeff_inv_aux n (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ φ]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_inv (φ : k⟦X⟧) : constantCoeff k φ⁻¹ = (constantCoeff k φ)⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_inv φ
theorem inv_eq_zero {φ : k⟦X⟧} : φ⁻¹ = 0 ↔ constantCoeff k φ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_zero
theorem zero_inv : (0 : k⟦X⟧)⁻¹ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.zero_inv
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) :
invOfUnit φ (Units.mk0 _ h) = φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem invOfUnit_eq' (φ : k⟦X⟧) (u : Units k) (h : constantCoeff k φ = u) :
invOfUnit φ u = φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit_eq' φ _ h
@[simp]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) : φ * φ⁻¹ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_cancel φ h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (φ : k⟦X⟧) (h : constantCoeff k φ ≠ 0) : φ⁻¹ * φ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_mul_cancel φ h
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq {φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k φ₃ ≠ 0) :
φ₁ = φ₂ * φ₃⁻¹ ↔ φ₁ * φ₃ = φ₂ :=
MvPowerSeries.eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq h
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
φ = ψ⁻¹ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one h
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one {φ ψ : k⟦X⟧} (h : constantCoeff k ψ ≠ 0) :
ψ⁻¹ = φ ↔ φ * ψ = 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one h
protected theorem mul_inv_rev (φ ψ : k⟦X⟧) : (φ * ψ)⁻¹ = ψ⁻¹ * φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.mul_inv_rev _ _
instance : InvOneClass k⟦X⟧ :=
{ inferInstanceAs <| InvOneClass <| MvPowerSeries Unit k with }
@[simp]
theorem C_inv (r : k) : (C k r)⁻¹ = C k r⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.C_inv _
@[simp]
theorem X_inv : (X : k⟦X⟧)⁻¹ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_inv _
theorem smul_inv (r : k) (φ : k⟦X⟧) : (r • φ)⁻¹ = r⁻¹ • φ⁻¹ :=
MvPowerSeries.smul_inv _ _
/-- `firstUnitCoeff` is the non-zero coefficient whose index is `f.order`, seen as a unit of the
field. It is obtained using `divided_by_X_pow_order`, defined in `PowerSeries.Order`. -/
def firstUnitCoeff {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) : kˣ :=
have : Invertible (constantCoeff k (divXPowOrder f)) := by
apply invertibleOfNonzero
simpa [constantCoeff_divXPowOrder_eq_zero_iff.not]
unitOfInvertible (constantCoeff k (divXPowOrder f))
/-- `Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order` is the inverse of the element obtained by diving a non-zero power
series by the largest power of `X` dividing it. Useful to create a term of type `Units`, done in
`Unit_divided_by_X_pow_order` -/
def Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) : k⟦X⟧ :=
invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf)
@[simp]
theorem Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_rightInv {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
divXPowOrder f * Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf = 1 :=
mul_invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf) rfl
@[simp]
theorem Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_leftInv {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf * divXPowOrder f = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_invOfUnit (divXPowOrder f) (firstUnitCoeff hf) rfl
open scoped Classical in
/-- `Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order` is the unit power series obtained by dividing a non-zero
power series by the largest power of `X` that divides it. -/
def Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order (f : k⟦X⟧) : k⟦X⟧ˣ :=
if hf : f = 0 then 1
else
{ val := divXPowOrder f
inv := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order hf
val_inv := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_rightInv hf
inv_val := Inv_divided_by_X_pow_order_leftInv hf }
theorem isUnit_divided_by_X_pow_order {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (divXPowOrder f) :=
⟨Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f,
by simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_neg hf, Units.val_mk]⟩
theorem Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order_nonzero {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
↑(Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f) = divXPowOrder f := by
simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_neg hf, Units.val_mk]
@[simp]
theorem Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order_zero : Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order (0 : k⟦X⟧) = 1 := by
simp only [Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order, dif_pos]
theorem eq_divided_by_X_pow_order_Iff_Unit {f : k⟦X⟧} (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f = divXPowOrder f ↔ IsUnit f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h]; exact isUnit_divided_by_X_pow_order hf, fun h ↦ by
have : f.order = 0 := by
simp [order_zero_of_unit h]
conv_lhs => rw [← X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder (f := f), this, ENat.toNat_zero,
pow_zero, one_mul]⟩
end Field
section IsLocalRing
variable {S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S) [IsLocalHom f]
@[instance]
theorem map.isLocalHom : IsLocalHom (map f) :=
MvPowerSeries.map.isLocalHom f
variable [IsLocalRing R]
instance : IsLocalRing R⟦X⟧ :=
{ inferInstanceAs <| IsLocalRing <| MvPowerSeries Unit R with }
end IsLocalRing
section IsDiscreteValuationRing
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
open IsDiscreteValuationRing
| theorem hasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization :
HasUnitMulPowIrreducibleFactorization k⟦X⟧ :=
⟨X, And.intro X_irreducible
(by
intro f hf
use f.order.toNat
use Unit_of_divided_by_X_pow_order f
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Inverse.lean | 283 | 289 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,892 | 1,892 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShapeSigns
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalBicomplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# The total complex of a bicomplex
Given a preadditive category `C`, two complex shapes `c₁ : ComplexShape I₁`,
`c₂ : ComplexShape I₂`, a bicomplex `K : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂`,
and a third complex shape `c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂` equipped
with `[TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]`, we construct the total complex
`K.total c₁₂ : HomologicalComplex C c₁₂`.
In particular, if `c := ComplexShape.up ℤ` and `K : HomologicalComplex₂ c c`, then for any
`n : ℤ`, `(K.total c).X n` identifies to the coproduct of the `(K.X p).X q` such that
`p + q = n`, and the differential on `(K.total c).X n` is induced by the sum of horizontal
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X (p + 1)).X q` and `(-1) ^ p` times the vertical
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X p).X (q + 1)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
namespace HomologicalComplex₂
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
{I₁ I₂ I₁₂ : Type*} {c₁ : ComplexShape I₁} {c₂ : ComplexShape I₂}
(K L M : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂) (φ : K ⟶ L) (e : K ≅ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M)
(c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂) [TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]
/-- A bicomplex has a total bicomplex if for any `i₁₂ : I₁₂`, the coproduct
of the objects `(K.X i₁).X i₂` such that `ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂` exists. -/
abbrev HasTotal := K.toGradedObject.HasMap (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
include e in
variable {K L} in
lemma hasTotal_of_iso [K.HasTotal c₁₂] : L.HasTotal c₁₂ :=
GradedObject.hasMap_of_iso (GradedObject.isoMk K.toGradedObject L.toGradedObject
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ =>
(HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₁ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₂).mapIso e)) _
variable [DecidableEq I₁₂] [K.HasTotal c₁₂]
section
variable (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
/-- The horizontal differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₁ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ (c₁.next i₁)).f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨_, i₂⟩ i₁₂)
/-- The vertical differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₂ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ (c₂.next i₂) ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, _⟩ i₁₂)
lemma d₁_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₁]
rw [K.shape_f _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
lemma d₂_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₂]
rw [HomologicalComplex.shape _ _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
end
namespace totalAux
/-! Lemmas in the `totalAux` namespace should be used only in the internals of
the construction of the total complex `HomologicalComplex₂.total`. Once that
definition is done, similar lemmas shall be restated, but with
| terms like `K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj` replaced by `K.ιTotal`. This is done in order
to prevent API leakage from definitions involving graded objects. -/
lemma d₁_eq' {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ i₁').f i₂ ≫
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/TotalComplex.lean | 84 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
/-! # Conditional expectation in L1
This file contains two more steps of the construction of the conditional expectation, which is
completed in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic`. See that file for a
description of the full process.
The conditional expectation of an `L²` function is defined in
`MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2`. In this file, we perform two steps.
* Show that the conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure
is integrable and define a map `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E))` which to a set associates a linear
map. That linear map sends `x ∈ E` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set
with value `x`.
* Extend that map to `condExpL1CLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E)`. This is done using the same
construction as the Bochner integral (see the file `MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1`).
## Main definitions
* `condExpL1`: Conditional expectation of a function as a linear map from `L1` to itself.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' G G' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
-- G for a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G]
-- G' for integrals on a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedSpace ℝ G'] [CompleteSpace G']
section CondexpInd
/-! ## Conditional expectation of an indicator as a continuous linear map.
The goal of this section is to build
`condExpInd (hm : m ≤ m0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set s) : G →L[ℝ] α →₁[μ] G`, which
takes `x : G` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set `s` with value `x`,
seen as an element of `α →₁[μ] G`.
-/
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section CondexpIndL1Fin
/-- Conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure,
as a function in L1. -/
def condExpIndL1Fin (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) : α →₁[μ] G :=
(integrable_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).toL1 _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] noncomputable alias condexpIndL1Fin := condExpIndL1Fin
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x =ᵐ[μ] condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x :=
(integrable_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).coeFn_toL1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul := condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul
variable {hm : m ≤ m0} [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
-- Porting note: this lemma fills the hole in `refine' (MemLp.coeFn_toLp _) ...`
-- which is not automatically filled in Lean 4
private theorem q {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {x : G} :
MemLp (condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x) 1 μ := by
rw [memLp_one_iff_integrable]; apply integrable_condExpIndSMul
|
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x y : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (x + y) =
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x + condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs y := by
ext1
refine (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).symm (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).symm)
rw [condExpIndSMul_add]
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans (Eventually.of_forall fun a => ?_)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/CondexpL1.lean | 92 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
| intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 174 | 178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
/-!
# Measurable functions in (pseudo-)metrizable Borel spaces
-/
open Filter MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
section Limits
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
open Metric
/-- A limit (over a general filter) of measurable functions valued in a (pseudo) metrizable space is
measurable. -/
theorem measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' {ι} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u]
[IsCountablyGenerated u] (hf : ∀ i, Measurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
Measurable g := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
apply measurable_of_isClosed'
intro s h1s h2s h3s
have : Measurable fun x => infNndist (g x) s := by
suffices Tendsto (fun i x => infNndist (f i x) s) u (𝓝 fun x => infNndist (g x) s) from
NNReal.measurable_of_tendsto' u (fun i => (hf i).infNndist) this
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim ⊢
intro x
exact ((continuous_infNndist_pt s).tendsto (g x)).comp (lim x)
have h4s : g ⁻¹' s = (fun x => infNndist (g x) s) ⁻¹' {0} := by
ext x
simp [h1s, ← h1s.mem_iff_infDist_zero h2s, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
rw [h4s]
exact this (measurableSet_singleton 0)
/-- A sequential limit of measurable functions valued in a (pseudo) metrizable space is
measurable. -/
theorem measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, Measurable (f i))
(lim : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 g)) : Measurable g :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' atTop hf lim
theorem aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae {ι} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
(u : Filter ι) [hu : NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u] (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) u (𝓝 (g x))) : AEMeasurable g μ := by
classical
rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have h'f : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f (v n)) μ := fun n => hf (v n)
set p : α → (ℕ → β) → Prop := fun x f' => Tendsto (fun n => f' n) atTop (𝓝 (g x))
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun n => f (v n) x := by
filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx using hx.comp hv
set aeSeqLim := fun x => ite (x ∈ aeSeqSet h'f p) (g x) (⟨f (v 0) x⟩ : Nonempty β).some
refine
⟨aeSeqLim,
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' atTop (aeSeq.measurable h'f p)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr fun x => ?_),
?_⟩
· simp_rw [aeSeqLim, aeSeq]
split_ifs with hx
· simp_rw [aeSeq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet h'f hx]
exact @aeSeq.fun_prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet _ α β _ _ _ _ _ h'f x hx
· exact tendsto_const_nhds
· exact
(ite_ae_eq_of_measure_compl_zero g (fun x => (⟨f (v 0) x⟩ : Nonempty β).some) (aeSeqSet h'f p)
(aeSeq.measure_compl_aeSeqSet_eq_zero h'f hp)).symm
theorem aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae' {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : AEMeasurable g μ :=
aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae atTop hf h_ae_tendsto
theorem aemeasurable_of_unif_approx {β} [MeasurableSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{μ : Measure α} {g : α → β}
(hf : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ f : α → β, AEMeasurable f μ ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ ε) :
AEMeasurable g μ := by
obtain ⟨u, -, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
choose f Hf using fun n : ℕ => hf (u n) (u_pos n)
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, dist (f n x) (g x) ≤ u n := ae_all_iff.2 fun n => (Hf n).2
filter_upwards [this]
intro x hx
rw [tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
exact squeeze_zero (fun n => dist_nonneg) hx u_lim
exact aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae' (fun n => (Hf n).1) this
theorem measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae {μ : Measure α} [μ.IsComplete] {f : ℕ → α → β}
{g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : Measurable g :=
aemeasurable_iff_measurable.mp
(aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae' (fun i => (hf i).aemeasurable) h_ae_tendsto)
theorem measurable_limit_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae {ι} [Countable ι] [Nonempty ι] {μ : Measure α}
{f : ι → α → β} {L : Filter ι} [L.IsCountablyGenerated] (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_ae_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : β, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) L (𝓝 l)) :
∃ f_lim : α → β, Measurable f_lim ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) L (𝓝 (f_lim x)) := by
classical
inhabit ι
rcases eq_or_neBot L with (rfl | hL)
· exact ⟨(hf default).mk _, (hf default).measurable_mk, Eventually.of_forall fun x => tendsto_bot⟩
let p : α → (ι → β) → Prop := fun x f' => ∃ l : β, Tendsto (fun n => f' n) L (𝓝 l)
| have hp_mem : ∀ x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p, p x fun n => f n x := fun x hx =>
aeSeq.fun_prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx
have h_ae_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, aeSeq hf p n x = f n x := aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_fun_ae hf h_ae_tendsto
set f_lim : α → β := fun x => dite (x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p) (fun h => (hp_mem x h).choose)
fun _ => (⟨f default x⟩ : Nonempty β).some
have hf_lim : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => aeSeq hf p n x) L (𝓝 (f_lim x)) := by
intro x
simp only [aeSeq, f_lim]
split_ifs with h
· refine (hp_mem x h).choose_spec.congr fun n => ?_
exact (aeSeq.mk_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf h n).symm
· exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h_ae_tendsto_f_lim : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) L (𝓝 (f_lim x)) :=
h_ae_eq.mono fun x hx => (hf_lim x).congr hx
have h_f_lim_meas : Measurable f_lim :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' L (aeSeq.measurable hf p)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr fun x => hf_lim x)
exact ⟨f_lim, h_f_lim_meas, h_ae_tendsto_f_lim⟩
end Limits
section TendstoIndicator
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {A : Set α}
variable {ι : Type*} (L : Filter ι) [IsCountablyGenerated L] {As : ι → Set α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Metrizable.lean | 111 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ` -/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit` -/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")]
alias nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse := nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A * A⁻¹ = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, mul_nonsing_inv A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right (B : Matrix m n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : B * A⁻¹ * A = B := by
simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left (B : Matrix n m α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B := by
simp [← Matrix.mul_assoc, nonsing_inv_mul A h]
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A * A⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_nonsing_inv A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * A = 1 :=
nonsing_inv_mul A (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A * A⁻¹ = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A * (A⁻¹ * B) = B :=
mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible (B : Matrix m n α) [Invertible A] : B * A⁻¹ * A = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_right A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible (B : Matrix n m α) [Invertible A] : A⁻¹ * (A * B) = B :=
nonsing_inv_mul_cancel_left A B (isUnit_det_of_invertible A)
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
A⁻¹ * B = C ↔ B = A * C :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible]⟩
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul_of_invertible (A B C : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
B * A⁻¹ = C ↔ B = C * A :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right_of_invertible],
fun h => by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]⟩
lemma inv_mulVec_eq_vec {A : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A]
{u v : n → α} (hM : u = A.mulVec v) : A⁻¹.mulVec u = v := by
rw [hM, Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, Matrix.inv_mul_of_invertible, Matrix.one_mulVec]
lemma mul_right_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix n m α) => A * x) :=
fun _ _ h => by simpa only [inv_mul_cancel_left_of_invertible] using congr_arg (A⁻¹ * ·) h
lemma mul_left_injective_of_invertible [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective (fun (x : Matrix m n α) => x * A) :=
fun a x hax => by simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible] using congr_arg (· * A⁻¹) hax
lemma mul_right_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix n m α} : A * x = A * y ↔ x = y :=
(mul_right_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
lemma mul_left_inj_of_invertible [Invertible A] {x y : Matrix m n α} : x * A = y * A ↔ x = y :=
(mul_left_injective_of_invertible A).eq_iff
end Inv
section InjectiveMul
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommRing α]
lemma mul_left_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix l m α => x * A) := fun _ _ g => by
simpa only [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_one, h] using congr_arg (· * B) g
lemma mul_right_injective_of_inv (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) (h : A * B = 1) :
Function.Injective (fun x : Matrix m l α => B * x) :=
fun _ _ g => by simpa only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.one_mul, h] using congr_arg (A * ·) g
end InjectiveMul
section vecMul
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse
[DecidableEq n] [Fintype m] [Finite n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, B * A = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨y ᵥ* B, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose rows hrows using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨Matrix.of rows, Matrix.ext fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [mul_apply_eq_vecMul, one_eq_pi_single, ← hrows]
rfl
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse
[DecidableEq m] [Finite m] [Fintype n] {A : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ ∃ B : Matrix n m R, A * B = 1 := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨B, hBA⟩ y ↦ ⟨B *ᵥ y, by simp [hBA]⟩⟩
choose cols hcols using (h <| Pi.single · 1)
refine ⟨(Matrix.of cols)ᵀ, Matrix.ext fun i j ↦ ?_⟩
rw [one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm, ← hcols j]
rfl
end Semiring
variable [DecidableEq m] {R K : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Fintype m]
theorem vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [vecMul_surjective_iff_exists_left_inverse, exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m R} :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [mulVec_surjective_iff_exists_right_inverse, exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit]
theorem vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.vecMul ↔ IsUnit A := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit]
exact LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (f := A.vecMulLinear) h
change Function.Injective A.vecMulLinear
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
intro c hc
replace h := h.invertible
simpa using congr_arg A⁻¹.vecMulLinear hc
theorem mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
Function.Injective A.mulVec ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← isUnit_transpose, ← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit]
simp_rw [vecMul_transpose]
theorem linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.row ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← col_transpose, ← mulVec_injective_iff, ← coe_mulVecLin, mulVecLin_transpose,
← vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit, coe_vecMulLinear]
theorem linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit {A : Matrix m m K} :
LinearIndependent K A.col ↔ IsUnit A := by
rw [← row_transpose, linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit, isUnit_transpose]
theorem vecMul_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_surjective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m R) [Invertible A] :
Function.Surjective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_surjective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem vecMul_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.vecMul :=
vecMul_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem mulVec_injective_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
Function.Injective A.mulVec :=
mulVec_injective_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.row :=
linearIndependent_rows_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_invertible (A : Matrix m m K) [Invertible A] :
LinearIndependent K A.col :=
linearIndependent_cols_iff_isUnit.2 <| isUnit_of_invertible A
end vecMul
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem nonsing_inv_cancel_or_zero : A⁻¹ * A = 1 ∧ A * A⁻¹ = 1 ∨ A⁻¹ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· exact Or.inl ⟨nonsing_inv_mul _ h, mul_nonsing_inv _ h⟩
· exact Or.inr (nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h)
theorem det_nonsing_inv_mul_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹.det * A.det = 1 := by
rw [← det_mul, A.nonsing_inv_mul h, det_one]
@[simp]
theorem det_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹.det = Ring.inverse A.det := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, det_invOf]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· rw [det_isEmpty, det_isEmpty, Ring.inverse_one]
· rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h, det_zero ‹_›]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit A⁻¹.det :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (A.det_nonsing_inv_mul_det h)
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A :=
calc
A⁻¹⁻¹ = 1 * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [Matrix.one_mul]
_ = A * A⁻¹ * A⁻¹⁻¹ := by rw [A.mul_nonsing_inv h]
_ = A := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, A⁻¹.mul_nonsing_inv (A.isUnit_nonsing_inv_det h), Matrix.mul_one]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹.det ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
rw [Matrix.det_nonsing_inv, isUnit_ringInverse]
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_nonsing_inv_iff {A : Matrix n n α} : IsUnit A⁻¹ ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_isUnit_det, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
-- `IsUnit.invertible` lifts the proposition `IsUnit A` to a constructive inverse of `A`.
/-- A version of `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is
therefore noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def invertibleOfIsUnitDet (h : IsUnit A.det) : Invertible A :=
⟨A⁻¹, nonsing_inv_mul A h, mul_nonsing_inv A h⟩
/-- A version of `Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible` with the inverse defeq to `A⁻¹` that is therefore
noncomputable. -/
noncomputable def nonsingInvUnit (h : IsUnit A.det) : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ _ (invertibleOfIsUnitDet A h)
theorem unitOfDetInvertible_eq_nonsingInvUnit [Invertible A.det] :
unitOfDetInvertible A = nonsingInvUnit A (isUnit_of_invertible _) := by
ext
rfl
variable {A} {B}
/-- If matrix A is left invertible, then its inverse equals its left inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
letI := invertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
invOf_eq_nonsing_inv A ▸ invOf_eq_left_inv h
/-- If matrix A is right invertible, then its inverse equals its right inverse. -/
theorem inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) : A⁻¹ = B :=
inv_eq_left_inv (mul_eq_one_comm.2 h)
section InvEqInv
variable {C : Matrix n n α}
/-- The left inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem left_inv_eq_left_inv (h : B * A = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_left_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A is unique when existing. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_right_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : A * C = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_right_inv g]
/-- The right inverse of matrix A equals the left inverse of A when they exist. -/
theorem right_inv_eq_left_inv (h : A * B = 1) (g : C * A = 1) : B = C := by
rw [← inv_eq_right_inv h, ← inv_eq_left_inv g]
theorem inv_inj (h : A⁻¹ = B⁻¹) (h' : IsUnit A.det) : A = B := by
refine left_inv_eq_left_inv (mul_nonsing_inv _ h') ?_
rw [h]
refine mul_nonsing_inv _ ?_
rwa [← isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff, ← h, isUnit_nonsing_inv_det_iff]
end InvEqInv
variable (A)
@[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : Matrix n n α)⁻¹ = 0 := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with ht | ht
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rcases (Fintype.card n).zero_le.eq_or_lt with hc | hc
· rw [eq_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hc
haveI := hc
ext i
exact (IsEmpty.false i).elim
· have hn : Nonempty n := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp hc
refine nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ ?_
simp [hn]
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (Matrix n n α) :=
{ Matrix.one, Matrix.inv with inv_one := inv_eq_left_inv (by simp) }
theorem inv_smul (k : α) [Invertible k] (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = ⅟ k • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_smul' (k : αˣ) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (k • A)⁻¹ = k⁻¹ • A⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_left_inv (by simp [h, smul_smul])
theorem inv_adjugate (A : Matrix n n α) (h : IsUnit A.det) : (adjugate A)⁻¹ = h.unit⁻¹ • A := by
refine inv_eq_left_inv ?_
rw [smul_mul, mul_adjugate, Units.smul_def, smul_smul, h.val_inv_mul, one_smul]
section Diagonal
/-- `diagonal v` is invertible if `v` is -/
def diagonalInvertible {α} [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] :
Invertible (diagonal v) :=
Invertible.map (diagonalRingHom n α) v
theorem invOf_diagonal_eq {α} [Semiring α] (v : n → α) [Invertible v] [Invertible (diagonal v)] :
⅟ (diagonal v) = diagonal (⅟ v) := by
rw [@Invertible.congr _ _ _ _ _ (diagonalInvertible v) rfl]
rfl
/-- `v` is invertible if `diagonal v` is -/
def invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible (v : n → α) [Invertible (diagonal v)] : Invertible v where
invOf := diag (⅟ (diagonal v))
invOf_mul_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_assoc, prod_erase_mul _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
mul_invOf_self :=
funext fun i => by
letI : Invertible (diagonal v).det := detInvertibleOfInvertible _
rw [invOf_eq, diag_smul, adjugate_diagonal, diag_diagonal]
dsimp
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_prod_erase _ _ (Finset.mem_univ _), ← det_diagonal]
exact mul_invOf_self _
/-- Together `Matrix.diagonalInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible (v : n → α) : Invertible (diagonal v) ≃ Invertible v where
toFun := @invertibleOfDiagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
invFun := @diagonalInvertible _ _ _ _ _ _
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_diagonal {v : n → α} : IsUnit (diagonal v) ↔ IsUnit v := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(diagonalInvertibleEquivInvertible v).nonempty_congr]
theorem inv_diagonal (v : n → α) : (diagonal v)⁻¹ = diagonal (Ring.inverse v) := by
rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse]
by_cases h : IsUnit v
· have := isUnit_diagonal.mpr h
cases this.nonempty_invertible
cases h.nonempty_invertible
rw [Ring.inverse_invertible, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_diagonal_eq]
· have := isUnit_diagonal.not.mpr h
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Pi.zero_def, diagonal_zero, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this]
end Diagonal
/-- The inverse of a 1×1 or 0×0 matrix is always diagonal.
While we could write this as `of fun _ _ => Ring.inverse (A default default)` on the RHS, this is
less useful because:
* It wouldn't work for 0×0 matrices.
* More things are true about diagonal matrices than constant matrices, and so more lemmas exist.
`Matrix.diagonal_unique` can be used to reach this form, while `Ring.inverse_eq_inv` can be used
to replace `Ring.inverse` with `⁻¹`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem inv_subsingleton [Subsingleton m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix m m α) :
A⁻¹ = diagonal fun i => Ring.inverse (A i i) := by
rw [inv_def, adjugate_subsingleton, smul_one_eq_diagonal]
congr! with i
exact det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
section Woodbury
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (U : Matrix n m α) (C : Matrix m m α) (V : Matrix m n α)
/-- The **Woodbury Identity** (`⁻¹` version). -/
theorem add_mul_mul_inv_eq_sub (hA : IsUnit A) (hC : IsUnit C) (hAC : IsUnit (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)) :
(A + U * C * V)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ - A⁻¹ * U * (C⁻¹ + V * A⁻¹ * U)⁻¹ * V * A⁻¹ := by
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hA.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨_⟩ := hC.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨iAC⟩ := hAC.nonempty_invertible
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv] at iAC
letI := invertibleAddMulMul A U C V
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
apply invOf_add_mul_mul
end Woodbury
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv_inv (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹⁻¹⁻¹ = A⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A.det
· rw [nonsing_inv_nonsing_inv _ h]
· simp [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_add_inv'` -/
theorem inv_add_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ + B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (A + B) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_add_inverse h
/-- The `Matrix` version of `inv_sub_inv'` -/
theorem inv_sub_inv {A B : Matrix n n α} (h : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit B) :
A⁻¹ - B⁻¹ = A⁻¹ * (B - A) * B⁻¹ := by
simpa only [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse] using Ring.inverse_sub_inverse h
theorem mul_inv_rev (A B : Matrix n n α) : (A * B)⁻¹ = B⁻¹ * A⁻¹ := by
simp only [inv_def]
rw [Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul, smul_smul, det_mul, adjugate_mul_distrib,
Ring.mul_inverse_rev]
/-- A version of `List.prod_inv_reverse` for `Matrix.inv`. -/
theorem list_prod_inv_reverse : ∀ l : List (Matrix n n α), l.prod⁻¹ = (l.reverse.map Inv.inv).prod
| [] => by rw [List.reverse_nil, List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, inv_one]
| A::Xs => by
rw [List.reverse_cons', List.map_concat, List.prod_concat, List.prod_cons,
mul_inv_rev, list_prod_inv_reverse Xs]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • A⁻¹ *ᵥ b = cramer A b := by
rw [cramer_eq_adjugate_mulVec, A.nonsing_inv_apply h, ← smul_mulVec_assoc, smul_smul,
h.mul_val_inv, one_smul]
/-- One form of **Cramer's rule**. See `Matrix.mulVec_cramer` for a stronger form. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_inv_vecMul_eq_cramer_transpose (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α) (h : IsUnit A.det) :
A.det • b ᵥ* A⁻¹ = cramer Aᵀ b := by
rw [← A⁻¹.transpose_transpose, vecMul_transpose, transpose_nonsing_inv, ← det_transpose,
Aᵀ.det_smul_inv_mulVec_eq_cramer _ (isUnit_det_transpose A h)]
/-! ### Inverses of permutated matrices
Note that the simp-normal form of `Matrix.reindex` is `Matrix.submatrix`, so we prove most of these
results about only the latter.
-/
section Submatrix
variable [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is invertible if `A` is -/
def submatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ A).submatrix e₂ e₁) <| by
rw [Matrix.submatrix_mul_equiv, mul_invOf_self, submatrix_one_equiv]
/-- `A` is invertible if `A.submatrix e₁ e₂` is -/
def invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m)
[Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)] : Invertible A :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ ((⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)).submatrix e₂.symm e₁.symm) <| by
have : A = (A.submatrix e₁ e₂).submatrix e₁.symm e₂.symm := by simp
conv in _ * _ =>
congr
rw [this]
rw [Matrix.submatrix_mul_equiv, mul_invOf_self, submatrix_one_equiv]
theorem invOf_submatrix_equiv_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) [Invertible A]
[Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂)] : ⅟ (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) = (⅟ A).submatrix e₂ e₁ := by
rw [@Invertible.congr _ _ _ _ _ (submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂) rfl]
rfl
/-- Together `Matrix.submatrixEquivInvertible` and
`Matrix.invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible` form an equivalence, although both sides of the
equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def submatrixEquivInvertibleEquivInvertible (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
Invertible (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) ≃ Invertible A where
toFun _ := invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
invFun _ := submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleOfSubmatrixEquivInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_submatrix_equiv {A : Matrix m m α} (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
IsUnit (A.submatrix e₁ e₂) ↔ IsUnit A := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(submatrixEquivInvertibleEquivInvertible A _ _).nonempty_congr]
@[simp]
theorem inv_submatrix_equiv (A : Matrix m m α) (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) :
(A.submatrix e₁ e₂)⁻¹ = A⁻¹.submatrix e₂ e₁ := by
by_cases h : IsUnit A
· cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := submatrixEquivInvertible A e₁ e₂
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, ← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_submatrix_equiv_eq A]
· have := (isUnit_submatrix_equiv e₁ e₂).not.mpr h
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ringInverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this,
submatrix_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem inv_reindex (e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix n n α) : (reindex e₁ e₂ A)⁻¹ = reindex e₂ e₁ A⁻¹ :=
inv_submatrix_equiv A e₁.symm e₂.symm
end Submatrix
open scoped Kronecker in
theorem inv_kronecker [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
(A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix n n α) : (A ⊗ₖ B)⁻¹ = A⁻¹ ⊗ₖ B⁻¹ := by
-- handle the special cases where either matrix is not invertible
by_cases hA : IsUnit A.det
swap
· cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· subsingleton
have hAB : ¬IsUnit (A ⊗ₖ B).det := by
refine mt (fun hAB => ?_) hA
rw [det_kronecker] at hAB
exact (isUnit_pow_iff Fintype.card_ne_zero).mp (isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left hAB)
rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ hA, zero_kronecker, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ hAB]
by_cases hB : IsUnit B.det; swap
· cases isEmpty_or_nonempty m
· subsingleton
have hAB : ¬IsUnit (A ⊗ₖ B).det := by
refine mt (fun hAB => ?_) hB
rw [det_kronecker] at hAB
exact (isUnit_pow_iff Fintype.card_ne_zero).mp (isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_right hAB)
rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ hB, kronecker_zero, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ hAB]
-- otherwise follows trivially from `mul_kronecker_mul`
· apply inv_eq_right_inv
rw [← mul_kronecker_mul, ← one_kronecker_one, mul_nonsing_inv _ hA, mul_nonsing_inv _ hB]
/-! ### More results about determinants -/
| section Det
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
/-- A variant of `Matrix.det_units_conj`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 744 | 748 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.