Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.SupIndep
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Finite partitions
In this file, we define finite partitions. A finpartition of `a : α` is a finite set of pairwise
disjoint parts `parts : Finset α` which does not contain `⊥` and whose supremum is `a`.
Finpartitions of a finset are at the heart of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. They are also studied
purely order theoretically in Sperner theory.
## Constructions
We provide many ways to build finpartitions:
* `Finpartition.ofErase`: Builds a finpartition by erasing `⊥` for you.
* `Finpartition.ofSubset`: Builds a finpartition from a subset of the parts of a previous
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.empty`: The empty finpartition of `⊥`.
* `Finpartition.indiscrete`: The indiscrete, aka trivial, aka pure, finpartition made of a single
part.
* `Finpartition.discrete`: The discrete finpartition of `s : Finset α` made of singletons.
* `Finpartition.bind`: Puts together the finpartitions of the parts of a finpartition into a new
finpartition.
* `Finpartition.ofExistsUnique`: Builds a finpartition from a collection of parts such that each
element is in exactly one part.
* `Finpartition.ofSetoid`: With `Fintype α`, constructs the finpartition of `univ : Finset α`
induced by the equivalence classes of `s : Setoid α`.
* `Finpartition.atomise`: Makes a finpartition of `s : Finset α` by breaking `s` along all finsets
in `F : Finset (Finset α)`. Two elements of `s` belong to the same part iff they belong to the
same elements of `F`.
`Finpartition.indiscrete` and `Finpartition.bind` together form the monadic structure of
`Finpartition`.
## Implementation notes
Forbidding `⊥` as a part follows mathematical tradition and is a pragmatic choice concerning
operations on `Finpartition`. Not caring about `⊥` being a part or not breaks extensionality (it's
not because the parts of `P` and the parts of `Q` have the same elements that `P = Q`). Enforcing
`⊥` to be a part makes `Finpartition.bind` uglier and doesn't rid us of the need of
`Finpartition.ofErase`.
## TODO
The order is the wrong way around to make `Finpartition a` a graded order. Is it bad to depart from
the literature and turn the order around?
The specialisation to `Finset α` could be generalised to atomistic orders.
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A finite partition of `a : α` is a pairwise disjoint finite set of elements whose supremum is
`a`. We forbid `⊥` as a part. -/
@[ext]
structure Finpartition [Lattice α] [OrderBot α] (a : α) where
/-- The elements of the finite partition of `a` -/
parts : Finset α
/-- The partition is supremum-independent -/
protected supIndep : parts.SupIndep id
/-- The supremum of the partition is `a` -/
sup_parts : parts.sup id = a
/-- No element of the partition is bottom -/
not_bot_mem : ⊥ ∉ parts
deriving DecidableEq
namespace Finpartition
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor which does not insist on `⊥` not being a part. -/
@[simps]
def ofErase [DecidableEq α] {a : α} (parts : Finset α) (sup_indep : parts.SupIndep id)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = a) : Finpartition a where
parts := parts.erase ⊥
supIndep := sup_indep.subset (erase_subset _ _)
sup_parts := (sup_erase_bot _).trans sup_parts
not_bot_mem := not_mem_erase _ _
/-- A `Finpartition` constructor from a bigger existing finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubset {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) {parts : Finset α} (subset : parts ⊆ P.parts)
(sup_parts : parts.sup id = b) : Finpartition b :=
{ parts := parts
supIndep := P.supIndep.subset subset
sup_parts := sup_parts
not_bot_mem := fun h ↦ P.not_bot_mem (subset h) }
/-- Changes the type of a finpartition to an equal one. -/
@[simps]
def copy {a b : α} (P : Finpartition a) (h : a = b) : Finpartition b where
parts := P.parts
supIndep := P.supIndep
sup_parts := h ▸ P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem := P.not_bot_mem
/-- Transfer a finpartition over an order isomorphism. -/
def map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} (e : α ≃o β) (P : Finpartition a) :
Finpartition (e a) where
parts := P.parts.map e
supIndep u hu _ hb hbu _ hx hxu := by
rw [← map_symm_subset] at hu
simp only [mem_map_equiv] at hb
have := P.supIndep hu hb (by simp [hbu]) (map_rel e.symm hx) ?_
· rw [← e.symm.map_bot] at this
exact e.symm.map_rel_iff.mp this
· convert e.symm.map_rel_iff.mpr hxu
rw [map_finset_sup, sup_map]
rfl
sup_parts := by simp [← P.sup_parts]
not_bot_mem := by
rw [mem_map_equiv]
convert P.not_bot_mem
exact e.symm.map_bot
@[simp]
theorem parts_map {β : Type*} [Lattice β] [OrderBot β] {a : α} {e : α ≃o β} {P : Finpartition a} :
(P.map e).parts = P.parts.map e := rfl
variable (α)
/-- The empty finpartition. -/
@[simps]
protected def empty : Finpartition (⊥ : α) where
parts := ∅
supIndep := supIndep_empty _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_empty
not_bot_mem := not_mem_empty ⊥
instance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
⟨Finpartition.empty α⟩
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_empty : (default : Finpartition (⊥ : α)) = Finpartition.empty α :=
rfl
variable {α} {a : α}
/-- The finpartition in one part, aka indiscrete finpartition. -/
@[simps]
def indiscrete (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : Finpartition a where
parts := {a}
supIndep := supIndep_singleton _ _
sup_parts := Finset.sup_singleton
not_bot_mem h := ha (mem_singleton.1 h).symm
variable (P : Finpartition a)
protected theorem le {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≤ a :=
(le_sup hb).trans P.sup_parts.le
theorem ne_bot {b : α} (hb : b ∈ P.parts) : b ≠ ⊥ := by
intro h
refine P.not_bot_mem (?_)
rw [h] at hb
exact hb
protected theorem disjoint : (P.parts : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint id :=
P.supIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
variable {P}
@[simp]
theorem parts_eq_empty_iff : P.parts = ∅ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun b hb ↦ P.not_bot_mem ?_⟩
· rw [h]
exact Finset.sup_empty
· rwa [← le_bot_iff.1 ((le_sup hb).trans h.le)]
@[simp]
theorem parts_nonempty_iff : P.parts.Nonempty ↔ a ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_iff_not, parts_eq_empty_iff]
theorem parts_nonempty (P : Finpartition a) (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : P.parts.Nonempty :=
parts_nonempty_iff.2 ha
instance : Unique (Finpartition (⊥ : α)) :=
{ (inferInstance : Inhabited (Finpartition (⊥ : α))) with
uniq := fun P ↦ by
ext a
exact iff_of_false (fun h ↦ P.ne_bot h <| le_bot_iff.1 <| P.le h) (not_mem_empty a) }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- There's a unique partition of an atom. -/
abbrev _root_.IsAtom.uniqueFinpartition (ha : IsAtom a) : Unique (Finpartition a) where
default := indiscrete ha.1
uniq P := by
have h : ∀ b ∈ P.parts, b = a := fun _ hb ↦
(ha.le_iff.mp <| P.le hb).resolve_left (P.ne_bot hb)
ext b
refine Iff.trans ⟨h b, ?_⟩ mem_singleton.symm
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := P.parts_nonempty ha.1
simp_rw [← h c hc]
exact hc
instance [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : Fintype (Finpartition a) :=
@Fintype.ofSurjective { p : Finset α // p.SupIndep id ∧ p.sup id = a ∧ ⊥ ∉ p } (Finpartition a) _
(Subtype.fintype _) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.1, i.2.1, i.2.2.1, i.2.2.2⟩) fun ⟨_, y, z, w⟩ ↦
⟨⟨_, y, z, w⟩, rfl⟩
/-! ### Refinement order -/
section Order
/-- We say that `P ≤ Q` if `P` refines `Q`: each part of `P` is less than some part of `Q`. -/
instance : LE (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ P.parts → ∃ c ∈ Q.parts, b ≤ c⟩
instance : PartialOrder (Finpartition a) :=
{ (inferInstance : LE (Finpartition a)) with
le_refl := fun _ b hb ↦ ⟨b, hb, le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ Q R hPQ hQR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQR hc
exact ⟨d, hd, hbc.trans hcd⟩
le_antisymm := fun P Q hPQ hQP ↦ by
ext b
refine ⟨fun hb ↦ ?_, fun hb ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hQP hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [P.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (P.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)]
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hQP hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := hPQ hc
rwa [hbc.antisymm]
rwa [Q.disjoint.eq_of_le hb hd (Q.ne_bot hb) (hbc.trans hcd)] }
instance [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : OrderTop (Finpartition a) where
top := if ha : a = ⊥ then (Finpartition.empty α).copy ha.symm else indiscrete ha
le_top P := by
split_ifs with h
· intro x hx
simpa [h, P.ne_bot hx] using P.le hx
· exact fun b hb ↦ ⟨a, mem_singleton_self _, P.le hb⟩
theorem parts_top_subset (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] : (⊤ : Finpartition a).parts ⊆ {a} := by
intro b hb
have hb : b ∈ Finpartition.parts (dite _ _ _) := hb
split_ifs at hb
· simp only [copy_parts, empty_parts, not_mem_empty] at hb
· exact hb
theorem parts_top_subsingleton (a : α) [Decidable (a = ⊥)] :
((⊤ : Finpartition a).parts : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton fun _ hb ↦ mem_singleton.1 <| parts_top_subset _ hb
-- TODO: this instance takes double-exponential time to generate all partitions, find a faster way
instance [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} : Fintype (Finpartition s) where
elems := s.powerset.powerset.image
fun ps ↦ if h : ps.sup id = s ∧ ⊥ ∉ ps ∧ ps.SupIndep id then ⟨ps, h.2.2, h.1, h.2.1⟩ else ⊤
complete P := by
refine mem_image.mpr ⟨P.parts, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_powerset]; intro p hp; rw [mem_powerset]; exact P.le hp
· simp [P.supIndep, P.sup_parts, P.not_bot_mem, -bot_eq_empty]
end Order
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α]
section Inf
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
instance : Min (Finpartition a) :=
⟨fun P Q ↦
ofErase ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2)
(by
rw [supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase]
simp only [mem_image, and_imp, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, id, Prod.exists,
mem_product, Finset.disjoint_sup_right, mem_erase, Ne]
rintro _ x₁ y₁ hx₁ hy₁ rfl _ h x₂ y₂ hx₂ hy₂ rfl
rcases eq_or_ne x₁ x₂ with (rfl | xdiff)
· refine Disjoint.mono inf_le_right inf_le_right (Q.disjoint hy₁ hy₂ ?_)
intro t
simp [t] at h
exact Disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left (P.disjoint hx₁ hx₂ xdiff))
(by
rw [sup_image, id_comp, sup_product_left]
trans P.parts.sup id ⊓ Q.parts.sup id
· simp_rw [Finset.sup_inf_distrib_right, Finset.sup_inf_distrib_left]
rfl
· rw [P.sup_parts, Q.sup_parts, inf_idem])⟩
@[simp]
theorem parts_inf (P Q : Finpartition a) :
(P ⊓ Q).parts = ((P.parts ×ˢ Q.parts).image fun bc : α × α ↦ bc.1 ⊓ bc.2).erase ⊥ :=
rfl
instance : SemilatticeInf (Finpartition a) :=
{ inf := Min.min
inf_le_left := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.1, hc.1, inf_le_left⟩
inf_le_right := fun P Q b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (mem_of_mem_erase hb)
rw [mem_product] at hc
exact ⟨c.2, hc.2, inf_le_right⟩
le_inf := fun P Q R hPQ hPR b hb ↦ by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ := hPQ hb
obtain ⟨d, hd, hbd⟩ := hPR hb
have h := _root_.le_inf hbc hbd
refine
⟨c ⊓ d,
mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot (P.ne_bot hb) h)
(mem_image.2 ⟨(c, d), mem_product.2 ⟨hc, hd⟩, rfl⟩),
h⟩ }
end Inf
theorem exists_le_of_le {a b : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) (hb : b ∈ Q.parts) :
∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := by
by_contra H
refine Q.ne_bot hb (disjoint_self.1 <| Disjoint.mono_right (Q.le hb) ?_)
rw [← P.sup_parts, Finset.disjoint_sup_right]
rintro c hc
obtain ⟨d, hd, hcd⟩ := h hc
refine (Q.disjoint hb hd ?_).mono_right hcd
rintro rfl
simp only [not_exists, not_and] at H
exact H _ hc hcd
theorem card_mono {a : α} {P Q : Finpartition a} (h : P ≤ Q) : #Q.parts ≤ #P.parts := by
classical
have : ∀ b ∈ Q.parts, ∃ c ∈ P.parts, c ≤ b := fun b ↦ exists_le_of_le h
choose f hP hf using this
rw [← card_attach]
refine card_le_card_of_injOn (fun b ↦ f _ b.2) (fun b _ ↦ hP _ b.2) fun b _ c _ h ↦ ?_
exact
Subtype.coe_injective
(Q.disjoint.elim b.2 c.2 fun H ↦
P.ne_bot (hP _ b.2) <| disjoint_self.1 <| H.mono (hf _ b.2) <| h.le.trans <| hf _ c.2)
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α}
section Bind
variable {P : Finpartition a} {Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i}
/-- Given a finpartition `P` of `a` and finpartitions of each part of `P`, this yields the
finpartition of `a` obtained by juxtaposing all the subpartitions. -/
@[simps]
def bind (P : Finpartition a) (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) : Finpartition a where
parts := P.parts.attach.biUnion fun i ↦ (Q i.1 i.2).parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
rintro a ha b hb h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion] at ha hb
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB⟩, -, hb⟩ := hb
obtain rfl | hAB := eq_or_ne A B
· exact (Q A hA).disjoint ha hb h
· exact (P.disjoint hA hB hAB).mono ((Q A hA).le ha) ((Q B hB).le hb)
sup_parts := by
simp_rw [sup_biUnion]
trans (sup P.parts id)
· rw [eq_comm, ← Finset.sup_attach]
exact sup_congr rfl fun b _hb ↦ (Q b.1 b.2).sup_parts.symm
· exact P.sup_parts
not_bot_mem h := by
rw [Finset.mem_biUnion] at h
obtain ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩ := h
exact (Q A hA).not_bot_mem h
theorem mem_bind : b ∈ (P.bind Q).parts ↔ ∃ A hA, b ∈ (Q A hA).parts := by
rw [bind, mem_biUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, -, h⟩
exact ⟨A, hA, h⟩
· rintro ⟨A, hA, h⟩
exact ⟨⟨A, hA⟩, mem_attach _ ⟨A, hA⟩, h⟩
theorem card_bind (Q : ∀ i ∈ P.parts, Finpartition i) :
#(P.bind Q).parts = ∑ A ∈ P.parts.attach, #(Q _ A.2).parts := by
apply card_biUnion
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩ - ⟨c, hc⟩ - hbc
rw [Function.onFun, Finset.disjoint_left]
rintro d hdb hdc
rw [Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at hbc
exact
(Q b hb).ne_bot hdb
(eq_bot_iff.2 <|
(le_inf ((Q b hb).le hdb) <| (Q c hc).le hdc).trans <| (P.disjoint hb hc hbc).le_bot)
end Bind
/-- Adds `b` to a finpartition of `a` to make a finpartition of `a ⊔ b`. -/
@[simps]
def extend (P : Finpartition a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hab : Disjoint a b) (hc : a ⊔ b = c) :
Finpartition c where
parts := insert b P.parts
supIndep := by
rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint, coe_insert]
exact P.disjoint.insert fun d hd _ ↦ hab.symm.mono_right <| P.le hd
sup_parts := by rwa [sup_insert, P.sup_parts, id, _root_.sup_comm]
not_bot_mem h := (mem_insert.1 h).elim hb.symm P.not_bot_mem
theorem card_extend (P : Finpartition a) (b c : α) {hb : b ≠ ⊥} {hab : Disjoint a b}
{hc : a ⊔ b = c} : #(P.extend hb hab hc).parts = #P.parts + 1 :=
card_insert_of_not_mem fun h ↦ hb <| hab.symm.eq_bot_of_le <| P.le h
end DistribLattice
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableEq α] {a b c : α} (P : Finpartition a)
/-- Restricts a finpartition to avoid a given element. -/
@[simps!]
def avoid (b : α) : Finpartition (a \ b) :=
ofErase
(P.parts.image (· \ b))
(P.disjoint.image_finset_of_le fun _ ↦ sdiff_le).supIndep
(by rw [sup_image, id_comp, Finset.sup_sdiff_right, ← Function.id_def, P.sup_parts])
@[simp]
theorem mem_avoid : c ∈ (P.avoid b).parts ↔ ∃ d ∈ P.parts, ¬d ≤ b ∧ d \ b = c := by
simp only [avoid, ofErase, mem_erase, Ne, mem_image, exists_prop, ← exists_and_left,
@and_left_comm (c ≠ ⊥)]
refine exists_congr fun d ↦ and_congr_right' <| and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
rw [sdiff_eq_bot_iff]
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
end Finpartition
/-! ### Finite partitions of finsets -/
namespace Finpartition
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Finset α} (P : Finpartition s) {a : α}
lemma subset {a : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ P.parts) : a ⊆ s := P.le ha
theorem nonempty_of_mem_parts {a : Finset α} (ha : a ∈ P.parts) : a.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| P.ne_bot ha
@[simp]
theorem not_empty_mem_parts : ∅ ∉ P.parts := P.not_bot_mem
theorem ne_empty (h : t ∈ P.parts) : t ≠ ∅ := P.ne_bot h
lemma eq_of_mem_parts (ht : t ∈ P.parts) (hu : u ∈ P.parts) (hat : a ∈ t) (hau : a ∈ u) : t = u :=
P.disjoint.elim ht hu <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨a, hat, hau⟩
theorem exists_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃ t ∈ P.parts, a ∈ t := by
simp_rw [← P.sup_parts] at ha
exact mem_sup.1 ha
theorem biUnion_parts : P.parts.biUnion id = s :=
(sup_eq_biUnion _ _).symm.trans P.sup_parts
theorem existsUnique_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : ∃! t, t ∈ P.parts ∧ a ∈ t := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := P.exists_mem ha
refine ⟨t, ⟨ht, ht'⟩, ?_⟩
rintro u ⟨hu, hu'⟩
exact P.eq_of_mem_parts hu ht hu' ht'
/--
Construct a `Finpartition s` from a finset of finsets `parts` such that each element of `s` is in
exactly one member of `parts`. This provides a converse to `Finpartition.subset`,
`Finpartition.not_empty_mem_parts` and `Finpartition.existsUnique_mem`.
-/
@[simps]
def ofExistsUnique (parts : Finset (Finset α)) (h : ∀ p ∈ parts, p ⊆ s)
(h' : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃! t ∈ parts, a ∈ t) (h'' : ∅ ∉ parts) :
Finpartition s where
parts := parts
supIndep := by
simp only [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint]
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [Function.onFun, Finset.disjoint_left]
intro x hx hx'
exact hab ((h' x (h _ ha hx)).unique ⟨ha, hx⟩ ⟨hb, hx'⟩)
sup_parts := by
ext i
simp only [mem_sup, id_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩
exact h j hj hj'
· rintro hi
exact (h' i hi).exists
not_bot_mem := h''
/-- The part of the finpartition that `a` lies in. -/
def part (a : α) : Finset α := if ha : a ∈ s then choose (hp := P.existsUnique_mem ha) else ∅
|
@[simp]
lemma part_mem : P.part a ∈ P.parts ↔ a ∈ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> simp [part, ha, choose_mem]
| Mathlib/Order/Partition/Finpartition.lean | 512 | 515 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Riccardo Brasca, Adam Topaz, Jujian Zhang, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Projective.Resolution
/-!
# Left-derived functors
We define the left-derived functors `F.leftDerived n : C ⥤ D` for any additive functor `F`
out of a category with projective resolutions.
We first define a functor
`F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory : C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ)` which is
`projectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _`. We show that if `X : C` and
`P : ProjectiveResolution X`, then `F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` identifies
to the image in the homotopy category of the functor `F` applied objectwise to `P.complex`
(this isomorphism is `P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F`).
Then, the left-derived functors `F.leftDerived n : C ⥤ D` are obtained by composing
`F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory` with the homology functors on the homotopy category.
Similarly we define natural transformations between left-derived functors coming from
natural transformations between the original additive functors,
and show how to compute the components.
## Main results
* `Functor.isZero_leftDerived_obj_projective_succ`: projective objects have no higher
left derived functor.
* `NatTrans.leftDerived`: the natural isomorphism between left derived functors
induced by natural transformation.
* `Functor.fromLeftDerivedZero`: the natural transformation `F.leftDerived 0 ⟶ F`,
which is an isomorphism when `F` is right exact (i.e. preserves finite colimits),
see also `Functor.leftDerivedZeroIsoSelf`.
## TODO
* refactor `Functor.leftDerived` (and `Functor.rightDerived`) when the necessary
material enters mathlib: derived categories, injective/projective derivability
structures, existence of derived functors from derivability structures.
Eventually, we shall get a right derived functor
`F.leftDerivedFunctorMinus : DerivedCategory.Minus C ⥤ DerivedCategory.Minus D`,
and `F.leftDerived` shall be redefined using `F.leftDerivedFunctorMinus`.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
[Abelian C] [HasProjectiveResolutions C] [Abelian D]
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
the functor `C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ)` which
sends `X : C` to `F` applied to a projective resolution of `X`. -/
noncomputable def Functor.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) :=
projectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _
/-- If `P : ProjectiveResolution Z` and `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
an isomorphism between `F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` and the complex
obtained by applying `F` to `P.complex`. -/
noncomputable def ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj {X : C}
(P : ProjectiveResolution X) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X ≅
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).obj P.complex :=
(F.mapHomotopyCategory _).mapIso P.iso ≪≫
(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors _).app P.complex
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv ≫ F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ ≫
(Q.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv := by
dsimp [Functor.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory, isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, iso_inv_naturality f P Q φ comm, Functor.map_comp]
erw [(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors (ComplexShape.down ℕ)).inv.naturality_assoc]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f ≫ (Q.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom =
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ := by
dsimp
rw [← cancel_epi (P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc,
isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality_assoc f P Q φ comm F,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
/-- The left derived functors of an additive functor. -/
noncomputable def Functor.leftDerived (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ D :=
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⋙ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n
/-- We can compute a left derived functor using a chosen projective resolution. -/
noncomputable def ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj {X : C} (P : ProjectiveResolution X)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.leftDerived n).obj X ≅
(HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor D _ n).obj
((F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj P.complex) :=
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n).mapIso
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F) ≪≫
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) n).app _
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.leftDerived n).map f ≫ (Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom =
(P.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ := by
dsimp [isoLeftDerivedObj, Functor.leftDerived]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality f P Q φ comm F,
Functor.map_comp, assoc]
erw [(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.down ℕ) n).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (P : ProjectiveResolution X) (Q : ProjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex) (comm : φ.f 0 ≫ Q.π.f 0 = P.π.f 0 ≫ f)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(P.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).inv ≫ (F.leftDerived n).map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ ≫
(Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom, assoc, assoc,
ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_hom_naturality f P Q φ comm F n,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
/-- The higher derived functors vanish on projective objects. -/
lemma Functor.isZero_leftDerived_obj_projective_succ
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) (X : C) [Projective X] :
IsZero ((F.leftDerived (n + 1)).obj X) := by
refine IsZero.of_iso ?_ ((ProjectiveResolution.self X).isoLeftDerivedObj F (n + 1))
erw [← HomologicalComplex.exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂ _ (F.map_isZero (by apply isZero_zero))
/-- We can compute a left derived functor on a morphism using a descent of that morphism
to a chain map between chosen projective resolutions.
-/
theorem Functor.leftDerived_map_eq (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
{P : ProjectiveResolution X} {Q : ProjectiveResolution Y} (g : P.complex ⟶ Q.complex)
(w : g ≫ Q.π = P.π ≫ (ChainComplex.single₀ C).map f) :
(F.leftDerived n).map f =
(P.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map g ≫
(Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (Q.isoLeftDerivedObj F n).hom,
ProjectiveResolution.isoLeftDerivedObj_hom_naturality f P Q g _ F n,
assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
rw [← HomologicalComplex.comp_f, w, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
ChainComplex.single₀_map_f_zero]
/-- The natural transformation
`F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⟶ G.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory` induced by
a natural transformation `F ⟶ G` between additive functors. -/
noncomputable def NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) :
F.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⟶ G.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory :=
whiskerLeft _ (NatTrans.mapHomotopyCategory α (ComplexShape.down ℕ))
lemma ProjectiveResolution.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory_app_eq
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) {X : C} (P : ProjectiveResolution X) :
(NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory α).app X =
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map
((NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α _).app P.complex) ≫
(P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (P.isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).hom, assoc, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
dsimp [isoLeftDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj, Functor.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors,
NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory]
rw [assoc]
erw [id_comp, comp_id]
obtain ⟨β, hβ⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map_surjective (iso P).hom
rw [← hβ]
dsimp
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory_id (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory_comp {F G H : C ⥤ D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H)
[F.Additive] [G.Additive] [H.Additive] :
NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory (α ≫ β) =
NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory α ≫
NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory β := rfl
/-- The natural transformation between left-derived functors induced by a natural transformation. -/
noncomputable def NatTrans.leftDerived
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) (n : ℕ) :
F.leftDerived n ⟶ G.leftDerived n :=
whiskerRight (NatTrans.leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory α) _
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.leftDerived_id (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
NatTrans.leftDerived (𝟙 F) n = 𝟙 (F.leftDerived n) := by
dsimp only [leftDerived]
simp only [leftDerivedToHomotopyCategory_id, whiskerRight_id']
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem NatTrans.leftDerived_comp {F G H : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] [H.Additive]
(α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (n : ℕ) :
NatTrans.leftDerived (α ≫ β) n = NatTrans.leftDerived α n ≫ NatTrans.leftDerived β n := by
simp [NatTrans.leftDerived]
namespace ProjectiveResolution
| /-- A component of the natural transformation between left-derived functors can be computed
using a chosen projective resolution. -/
lemma leftDerived_app_eq
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) {X : C} (P : ProjectiveResolution X)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/LeftDerived.lean | 225 | 228 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
| FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 314 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,812 | 1,815 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-!
# Separable polynomials
We define a polynomial to be separable if it is coprime with its derivative. We prove basic
properties about separable polynomials here.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Separable f`: a polynomial `f` is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative.
* `IsSeparable K x`: an element `x` is separable over `K` iff the minimal polynomial of `x`
over `K` is separable.
* `Algebra.IsSeparable K L`: `L` is separable over `K` iff every element in `L` is separable
over `K`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
/-- A polynomial is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative. -/
@[stacks 09H1 "first part"]
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_mul_right {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : g.Separable := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_mul_left
theorem Separable.of_dvd {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hfg : g ∣ f) : g.Separable := by
rcases hfg with ⟨f', rfl⟩
exact Separable.of_mul_left hf
theorem separable_gcd_left {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{f : F[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (g : F[X]) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
theorem separable_gcd_right {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{g : F[X]} (f : F[X]) (hg : g.Separable) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
theorem Separable.isCoprime {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : IsCoprime f g := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_pow' {f : R[X]} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (_h : (f ^ n).Separable), IsUnit f ∨ f.Separable ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0
| 0 => fun _h => Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
| 1 => fun h => Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨pow_one f ▸ h, rfl⟩
| n + 2 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ] at h
exact Or.inl (isCoprime_self.1 h.isCoprime.of_mul_left_right)
theorem Separable.of_pow {f : R[X]} (hf : ¬IsUnit f) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hfs : (f ^ n).Separable) : f.Separable ∧ n = 1 :=
(hfs.of_pow'.resolve_left hf).resolve_right hn
theorem Separable.map {p : R[X]} (h : p.Separable) {f : R →+* S} : (p.map f).Separable :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a.map f, b.map f, by
rw [derivative_map, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, H,
Polynomial.map_one]⟩
theorem _root_.Associated.separable {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) (h : f.Separable) : g.Separable := by
obtain ⟨⟨u, v, h1, h2⟩, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a * v + b * derivative v, b * v, ?_⟩
replace h := congr($h * $(h1))
have h3 := congr(derivative $(h1))
| simp only [← ha, derivative_mul, derivative_one] at h3 ⊢
calc
_ = (a * f + b * derivative f) * (u * v)
+ (b * f) * (derivative u * v + u * derivative v) := by ring1
_ = 1 := by rw [h, h3]; ring1
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 131 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
| · rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 881 | 882 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condExp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condExp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
variable (E) in
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condExp_zero]; simp⟩
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
theorem condExp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_eq := condExp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condExp.congr (hf.condExp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).trans
((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condExp_neg ..).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condExp_smul ..).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
theorem supermartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
theorem submartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
end Martingale
theorem martingale_iff [PartialOrder E] :
Martingale f ℱ μ ↔ Supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩, fun ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨hf₁.1, fun i j hij => (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
theorem martingale_condExp (f : Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω)
[SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] : Martingale (fun i => μ[f|ℱ i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨fun _ => stronglyMeasurable_condExp, fun _ j hij => condExp_condExp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) (ℱ.le j)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias martingale_condexp := martingale_condExp
namespace Supermartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
theorem condExp_ae_le [LE E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_le := condExp_ae_le
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_mono_ae integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hf.integrable i).integrableOn ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ heq using heq
theorem add [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).le.trans ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.supermartingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_neg ..).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
protected theorem adapted [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
protected theorem integrable [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
hf.2.2 i
theorem ae_le_condExp [LE E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) :
f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i] :=
hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ae_le_condexp := ae_le_condExp
theorem add [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).add (hg.2.2 i)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).symm.le
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij, hg.2.1 i j hij]
intros
refine add_le_add ?_ ?_ <;> assumption
theorem add_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f + g) ℱ μ :=
hf.add hg.submartingale
theorem neg [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (-f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.neg, fun i j hij => (condExp_neg ..).le.trans ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).neg⟩
filter_upwards [hf.2.1 i j hij] with _ _
simpa
/-- The converse of this lemma is `MeasureTheory.submartingale_of_setIntegral_le`. -/
theorem setIntegral_le [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
{i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) :
∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← integral_neg, ← integral_neg]
exact Supermartingale.setIntegral_le hf.neg hij hs
theorem sub_supermartingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Supermartingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_supermartingale hg.supermartingale
protected theorem sup {f g : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (f ⊔ g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => @StronglyMeasurable.sup _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) _ _ _ (hf.adapted i) (hg.adapted i),
fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => Integrable.sup (hf.integrable _) (hg.integrable _)⟩
refine EventuallyLE.sup_le ?_ ?_
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf.2.1 i j hij)
(condExp_mono (hf.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => le_max_left _ _))
· exact EventuallyLE.trans (hg.2.1 i j hij)
(condExp_mono (hg.integrable _) (Integrable.sup (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j))
(Eventually.of_forall fun x => le_max_right _ _))
protected theorem pos {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale (f⁺) ℱ μ :=
hf.sup (martingale_zero _ _ _).submartingale
end Submartingale
section Submartingale
theorem submartingale_of_setIntegral_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j : ι,
i ≤ j → ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
suffices f i ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] by exact ae_le_of_ae_le_trim this
suffices 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.trim (ℱ.le i)] μ[f j|ℱ i] - f i by
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
rwa [← sub_nonneg]
refine ae_nonneg_of_forall_setIntegral_nonneg
((integrable_condExp.sub (hint i)).trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.sub <| hadp i))
fun s hs _ => ?_
specialize hf i j hij s hs
rwa [← setIntegral_trim _ (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.sub <| hadp i) hs,
integral_sub' integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hint i).integrableOn, sub_nonneg,
setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hint j) hs]
theorem submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted ℱ f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i]) :
Submartingale f ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hadp, fun i j hij => ?_, hint⟩
rw [← condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hadp _) (hint _), ← eventually_sub_nonneg]
exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf i j hij) (condExp_sub (hint _) (hint _) _).le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg := submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg
theorem Submartingale.condExp_sub_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι}
(hij : i ≤ j) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] := by
by_cases h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (ℱ.le i))
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite (ℱ.le i) h]
refine EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_sub (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _) _).symm.le
rw [eventually_sub_nonneg,
condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.adapted _) (hf.integrable _)]
exact hf.2.1 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias Submartingale.condexp_sub_nonneg := Submartingale.condExp_sub_nonneg
theorem submartingale_iff_condExp_sub_nonneg [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} :
Submartingale f ℱ μ ↔
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j - f i|ℱ i] :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.adapted, h.integrable, fun _ _ => h.condExp_sub_nonneg⟩, fun ⟨hadp, hint, h⟩ =>
submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg hadp hint h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_iff_condexp_sub_nonneg := submartingale_iff_condExp_sub_nonneg
end Submartingale
namespace Supermartingale
theorem sub_submartingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem sub_martingale [Preorder E] [AddLeftMono E]
(hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Supermartingale (f - g) ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_submartingale hg.submartingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [Lattice F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
[OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.1.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_, fun i => (hf.2.2 i).smul c⟩
filter_upwards [condExp_smul c (f j) (ℱ i), hf.2.1 i j hij] with ω hω hle
simpa only [hω, Pi.smul_apply] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hle hc
theorem smul_nonpos [IsOrderedAddMonoid F] {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ}
(hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Supermartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
end
end Supermartingale
namespace Submartingale
section
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [Lattice F] [IsOrderedAddMonoid F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] [OrderedSMul ℝ F]
theorem smul_nonneg {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Submartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(c • -f))]
exact Supermartingale.neg (hf.neg.smul_nonneg hc)
theorem smul_nonpos {f : ι → Ω → F} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≤ 0) (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
Supermartingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
rw [← neg_neg c, (by ext (i x); simp : - -c • f = -(-c • f))]
exact (hf.smul_nonneg <| neg_nonneg.2 hc).neg
end
end Submartingale
section Nat
variable {𝒢 : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ) :
Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_of_setIntegral_le hadp hint fun i j hij s hs => ?_
induction' hij with k hk₁ hk₂
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans hk₂ (hf k s (𝒢.mono hk₁ _ hs))
theorem supermartingale_of_setIntegral_succ_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ ≤ ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ) :
Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) ?_).neg
simpa only [integral_neg, Pi.neg_apply, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem martingale_of_setIntegral_eq_succ [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet[𝒢 i] s → ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ) :
Martingale f 𝒢 μ :=
martingale_iff.2 ⟨supermartingale_of_setIntegral_succ_le hadp hint fun i s hs => (hf i s hs).ge,
submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp hint fun i s hs => (hf i s hs).le⟩
theorem submartingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) :
Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_of_setIntegral_le_succ hadp hint fun i s hs => ?_
have : ∫ ω in s, f (i + 1) ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, (μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) ω ∂μ :=
(setIntegral_condExp (𝒢.le i) (hint _) hs).symm
rw [this]
exact setIntegral_mono_ae (hint i).integrableOn integrable_condExp.integrableOn (hf i)
theorem supermartingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) :
Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_nat hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) fun i =>
EventuallyLE.trans ?_ (condExp_neg ..).symm.le).neg
filter_upwards [hf i] with x hx using neg_le_neg hx
theorem martingale_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} (hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f)
(hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ) (hf : ∀ i, f i =ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) : Martingale f 𝒢 μ :=
martingale_iff.2 ⟨supermartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => (hf i).symm.le,
submartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => (hf i).le⟩
theorem submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f (i + 1) - f i|𝒢 i]) : Submartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine submartingale_nat hadp hint fun i => ?_
rw [← condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (𝒢.le _) (hadp _) (hint _), ← eventually_sub_nonneg]
exact EventuallyLE.trans (hf i) (condExp_sub (hint _) (hint _) _).le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias submartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg_nat := submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat
theorem supermartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f i - f (i + 1)|𝒢 i]) : Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ := by
rw [← neg_neg f]
refine (submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat hadp.neg (fun i => (hint i).neg) ?_).neg
simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.neg_apply, neg_sub_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias supermartingale_of_condexp_sub_nonneg_nat := supermartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat
theorem martingale_of_condExp_sub_eq_zero_nat [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hadp : Adapted 𝒢 f) (hint : ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ)
(hf : ∀ i, μ[f (i + 1) - f i|𝒢 i] =ᵐ[μ] 0) : Martingale f 𝒢 μ := by
refine martingale_iff.2 ⟨supermartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat hadp hint fun i => ?_,
submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat hadp hint fun i => (hf i).symm.le⟩
rw [← neg_sub]
refine (EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (condExp_neg ..).symm).le
filter_upwards [hf i] with x hx
simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.neg_apply, zero_eq_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias martingale_of_condexp_sub_eq_zero_nat := martingale_of_condExp_sub_eq_zero_nat
-- Note that one cannot use `Submartingale.zero_le_of_predictable` to prove the other two
-- corresponding lemmas without imposing more restrictions to the ordering of `E`
/-- A predictable submartingale is a.e. greater equal than its initial state. -/
theorem Submartingale.zero_le_of_predictable [Preorder E] [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ 𝒢]
{f : ℕ → Ω → E} (hfmgle : Submartingale f 𝒢 μ) (hfadp : Adapted 𝒢 fun n => f (n + 1)) (n : ℕ) :
f 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f n := by
induction' n with k ih
· rfl
· exact ih.trans ((hfmgle.2.1 k (k + 1) k.le_succ).trans_eq <| Germ.coe_eq.mp <|
congr_arg Germ.ofFun <| condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (𝒢.le _) (hfadp _) <| hfmgle.integrable _)
/-- A predictable supermartingale is a.e. less equal than its initial state. -/
theorem Supermartingale.le_zero_of_predictable [Preorder E] [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ 𝒢]
{f : ℕ → Ω → E} (hfmgle : Supermartingale f 𝒢 μ) (hfadp : Adapted 𝒢 fun n => f (n + 1))
(n : ℕ) : f n ≤ᵐ[μ] f 0 := by
induction' n with k ih
· rfl
· exact ((Germ.coe_eq.mp <| congr_arg Germ.ofFun <| condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (𝒢.le _)
(hfadp _) <| hfmgle.integrable _).symm.trans_le (hfmgle.2.1 k (k + 1) k.le_succ)).trans ih
/-- A predictable martingale is a.e. equal to its initial state. -/
theorem Martingale.eq_zero_of_predictable [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ 𝒢] {f : ℕ → Ω → E}
(hfmgle : Martingale f 𝒢 μ) (hfadp : Adapted 𝒢 fun n => f (n + 1)) (n : ℕ) : f n =ᵐ[μ] f 0 := by
induction' n with k ih
· rfl
· exact ((Germ.coe_eq.mp (congr_arg Germ.ofFun <| condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (𝒢.le _) (hfadp _)
(hfmgle.integrable _))).symm.trans (hfmgle.2 k (k + 1) k.le_succ)).trans ih
namespace Submartingale
protected theorem integrable_stoppedValue [LE E] {f : ℕ → Ω → E} (hf : Submartingale f 𝒢 μ)
{τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime 𝒢 τ) {N : ℕ} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
Integrable (stoppedValue f τ) μ :=
integrable_stoppedValue ℕ hτ hf.integrable hbdd
end Submartingale
theorem Submartingale.sum_mul_sub [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {R : ℝ} {ξ f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
(hf : Submartingale f 𝒢 μ) (hξ : Adapted 𝒢 ξ) (hbdd : ∀ n ω, ξ n ω ≤ R)
(hnonneg : ∀ n ω, 0 ≤ ξ n ω) :
Submartingale (fun n => ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, ξ k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) 𝒢 μ := by
have hξbdd : ∀ i, ∃ C, ∀ ω, |ξ i ω| ≤ C := fun i =>
⟨R, fun ω => (abs_of_nonneg (hnonneg i ω)).trans_le (hbdd i ω)⟩
have hint : ∀ m, Integrable (∑ k ∈ Finset.range m, ξ k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) μ := fun m =>
integrable_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => Integrable.bdd_mul ((hf.integrable _).sub (hf.integrable _))
hξ.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable (hξbdd _)
have hadp : Adapted 𝒢 fun n => ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, ξ k * (f (k + 1) - f k) := by
| intro m
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum' _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
exact (hξ.stronglyMeasurable_le hi.le).mul
((hf.adapted.stronglyMeasurable_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hi)).sub
(hf.adapted.stronglyMeasurable_le hi.le))
refine submartingale_of_condExp_sub_nonneg_nat hadp hint fun i => ?_
simp only [← Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub _ (Nat.le_succ _), Finset.sum_apply, Pi.mul_apply,
Pi.sub_apply, Nat.Ico_succ_singleton, Finset.sum_singleton]
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 485 | 493 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Unions of finite sets
This file defines the union of a family `t : α → Finset β` of finsets bounded by a finset
`s : Finset α`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.disjUnion`: Given a hypothesis `h` which states that finsets `s` and `t` are disjoint,
`s.disjUnion t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`; this does
not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.biUnion`: Finite unions of finsets; given an indexing function `f : α → Finset β` and an
`s : Finset α`, `s.biUnion f` is the union of all finsets of the form `f a` for `a ∈ s`.
## TODO
Remove `Finset.biUnion` in favour of `Finset.sup`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
variable {α β γ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {t t₁ t₂ : α → Finset β}
namespace Finset
section DisjiUnion
/-- `disjiUnion s f h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjiUnion s f` iff `a ∈ f i` for some `i ∈ s`.
It is the same as `s.biUnion f`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The
hypothesis ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (hf : (s : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint t) : Finset β :=
⟨s.val.bind (Finset.val ∘ t), Multiset.nodup_bind.2
⟨fun a _ ↦ (t a).nodup, s.nodup.pairwise fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦ disjoint_val.2 <| hf ha hb hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).1 = s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_empty (t : α → Finset β) : disjiUnion ∅ t (by simp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_disjiUnion {b : β} {h} : b ∈ s.disjiUnion t h ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, disjiUnion_val, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_disjiUnion {h} : (s.disjiUnion t h : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_disjiUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → Finset β) (H) :
disjiUnion (cons a s ha) f H =
(f a).disjUnion ((s.disjiUnion f) fun _ hb _ hc ↦ H (mem_cons_of_mem hb) (mem_cons_of_mem hc))
(disjoint_left.2 fun _ hb h ↦
let ⟨_, hc, h⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp h
disjoint_left.mp
(H (mem_cons_self a s) (mem_cons_of_mem hc) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc ha).symm) hb h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.cons_bind _ _ _
@[simp] lemma singleton_disjiUnion (a : α) {h} : Finset.disjiUnion {a} t h = t a :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_bind _ _
lemma disjiUnion_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) (h1 h2) :
(s.disjiUnion f h1).disjiUnion g h2 =
s.attach.disjiUnion
(fun a ↦ ((f a).disjiUnion g) fun _ hb _ hc ↦
h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hb⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hc⟩))
fun a _ b _ hab ↦
disjoint_left.mpr fun x hxa hxb ↦ by
obtain ⟨xa, hfa, hga⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxa
obtain ⟨xb, hfb, hgb⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxb
refine disjoint_left.mp
(h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hfa⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, b.prop, hfb⟩) ?_) hga
hgb
rintro rfl
exact disjoint_left.mp (h1 a.prop b.prop <| Subtype.coe_injective.ne hab) hfa hfb :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_assoc.trans (Multiset.attach_bind_coe _ _).symm
lemma sUnion_disjiUnion {f : α → Finset (Set β)} (I : Finset α)
(hf : (I : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint f) :
⋃₀ (I.disjiUnion f hf : Set (Set β)) = ⋃ a ∈ I, ⋃₀ ↑(f a) := by
ext
simp only [coe_disjiUnion, Set.mem_sUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, exists_prop]
tauto
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β}
| private lemma pairwiseDisjoint_fibers : Set.PairwiseDisjoint ↑t fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a) :=
fun x' hx y' hy hne ↦ by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]; rintro i ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, rfl⟩; exact hne rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Union.lean | 95 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Map
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Pointwise operations on filters
This file defines pointwise operations on filters. This is useful because usual algebraic operations
distribute over pointwise operations. For example,
* `(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m`
* `𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y`
## Main declarations
* `0` (`Filter.instZero`): Pure filter at `0 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `0 : Set α`.
* `1` (`Filter.instOne`): Pure filter at `1 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `1 : Set α`.
* `f + g` (`Filter.instAdd`): Addition, filter generated by all `s + t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f * g` (`Filter.instMul`): Multiplication, filter generated by all `s * t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `-f` (`Filter.instNeg`): Negation, filter of all `-s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f⁻¹` (`Filter.instInv`): Inversion, filter of all `s⁻¹` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f - g` (`Filter.instSub`): Subtraction, filter generated by all `s - t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f / g` (`Filter.instDiv`): Division, filter generated by all `s / t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f +ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVAdd`): Scalar addition, filter generated by all `s +ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f -ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVSub`): Scalar subtraction, filter generated by all `s -ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f`
and `t ∈ g`.
* `f • g` (`Filter.instSMul`): Scalar multiplication, filter generated by all `s • t` where
`s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `a +ᵥ f` (`Filter.instVAddFilter`): Translation, filter of all `a +ᵥ s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `a • f` (`Filter.instSMulFilter`): Scaling, filter of all `a • s` where `s ∈ f`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Filter α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • f`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition. See note [pointwise nat action].
## Implementation notes
We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`).
## Tags
filter multiplication, filter addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
-/
open Function Set Filter Pointwise
variable {F α β γ δ ε : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-! ### `0`/`1` as filters -/
section One
variable [One α] {f : Filter α} {s : Set α}
/-- `1 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `1 : α` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"`0 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `0 : α` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instOne : One (Filter α) :=
⟨pure 1⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instOne Filter.instZero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : s ∈ (1 : Filter α) ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
mem_pure
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : Set α) ∈ (1 : Filter α) :=
mem_pure.2 Set.one_mem_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_one : pure 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_prod]
theorem one_prod {l : Filter β} : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ l = map (1, ·) l := pure_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_zero]
theorem prod_one {l : Filter β} : l ×ˢ (1 : Filter α) = map (·, 1) l := prod_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem principal_one : 𝓟 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
principal_singleton _
@[to_additive]
theorem one_neBot : (1 : Filter α).NeBot :=
Filter.pure_neBot
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] one_neBot zero_neBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_one' (f : α → β) : (1 : Filter α).map f = pure (f 1) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_one_iff : f ≤ 1 ↔ (1 : Set α) ∈ f :=
le_pure_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.le_one_iff (h : f.NeBot) : f ≤ 1 ↔ f = 1 :=
h.le_pure_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventually_one {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 1, p x) ↔ p 1 :=
eventually_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tendsto_one {a : Filter β} {f : β → α} : Tendsto f a 1 ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = 1 :=
tendsto_pure
@[to_additive zero_prod_zero]
theorem one_prod_one [One β] : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ (1 : Filter β) = 1 :=
prod_pure_pure
/-- `pure` as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as a `ZeroHom`."]
def pureOneHom : OneHom α (Filter α) where
toFun := pure; map_one' := pure_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureOneHom : (pureOneHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureOneHom_apply (a : α) : pureOneHom a = pure a :=
rfl
variable [One β]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_one [FunLike F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : map φ 1 = 1 := by
simp
end One
/-! ### Filter negation/inversion -/
section Inv
variable [Inv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α}
/-- The inverse of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `⁻¹` of its sets. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `-` of its sets."]
instance instInv : Inv (Filter α) :=
⟨map Inv.inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_inv : f.map Inv.inv = f⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv : s ∈ f⁻¹ ↔ Inv.inv ⁻¹' s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_le_inv (hf : f ≤ g) : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ :=
map_mono hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_pure : (pure a : Filter α)⁻¹ = pure a⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_bot_iff : f⁻¹ = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem neBot_inv_iff : f⁻¹.NeBot ↔ NeBot f :=
map_neBot_iff _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.inv : f.NeBot → f⁻¹.NeBot := fun h => h.map _
@[to_additive neg.instNeBot]
lemma inv.instNeBot [NeBot f] : NeBot f⁻¹ := .inv ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] inv.instNeBot neg.instNeBot
end Inv
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected lemma comap_inv : comap Inv.inv f = f⁻¹ :=
.symm <| map_eq_comap_of_inverse (inv_comp_inv _) (inv_comp_inv _)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv (hs : s ∈ f) : s⁻¹ ∈ f⁻¹ := by rwa [mem_inv, inv_preimage, inv_inv]
/-- Inversion is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "Negation is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`."]
protected def instInvolutiveInv : InvolutiveInv (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInv with
inv_inv := fun f => map_map.trans <| by rw [inv_involutive.comp_self, map_id] }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instInvolutiveInv Filter.instInvolutiveNeg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem inv_le_inv_iff : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv f ▸ inv_inv g ▸ Filter.inv_le_inv h, Filter.inv_le_inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_inv : f⁻¹ ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g⁻¹ := by rw [← Filter.inv_le_inv_iff, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self : f⁻¹ ≤ f ↔ f⁻¹ = f :=
⟨fun h => h.antisymm <| inv_le_iff_le_inv.1 h, Eq.le⟩
end InvolutiveInv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_atTop {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] :
(atTop : Filter G)⁻¹ = atBot :=
(OrderIso.inv G).map_atTop
/-! ### Filter addition/multiplication -/
section Mul
variable [Mul α] [Mul β] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f * g` is generated by `{s * t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f + g` is generated by `{s + t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instMul : Mul (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· * ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s` rather
than all the way to `Set.image2 (· * ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· * ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instMul Filter.instAdd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_mul : map₂ (· * ·) f g = f * g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_mul : s ∈ f * g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s * t ∈ f * g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_bot : f * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_bot_iff : f * g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] -- TODO: make this a scoped instance in the `Pointwise` namespace
lemma mul_neBot_iff : (f * g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.mul : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f * g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_left : (f * g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_right : (f * g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive add.instNeBot]
protected lemma mul.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f * g) := .mul ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] mul.instNeBot add.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_mul : pure a * g = g.map (a * ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_pure : f * pure b = f.map (· * b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_mul_pure : (pure a : Filter α) * pure b = pure (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_iff : h ≤ f * g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s * t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_mul [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) :
(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m :=
map_map₂_distrib <| map_mul m
/-- `pure` operation as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddHom`."]
def pureMulHom : α →ₙ* Filter α where
toFun := pure; map_mul' _ _ := pure_mul_pure.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMulHom : (pureMulHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMulHom_apply (a : α) : pureMulHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end Mul
/-! ### Filter subtraction/division -/
section Div
variable [Div α] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f / g` is generated by `{s / t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f - g` is generated by `{s - t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instDiv : Div (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· / ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s`
rather than all the way to `Set.image2 (· / ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· / ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instDiv Filter.instSub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_div : map₂ (· / ·) f g = f / g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_div : s ∈ f / g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s / t ∈ f / g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_div : ⊥ / g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_bot : f / ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_bot_iff : f / g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_neBot_iff : (f / g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.div : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f / g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_left : (f / g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_right : (f / g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive sub.instNeBot]
lemma div.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f / g) := .div ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] div.instNeBot sub.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_div : pure a / g = g.map (a / ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_pure : f / pure b = f.map (· / b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_div_pure : (pure a : Filter α) / pure b = pure (a / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div : f₁ ≤ f₂ → g₁ ≤ g₂ → f₁ / g₁ ≤ f₂ / g₂ :=
map₂_mono
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_left : g₁ ≤ g₂ → f / g₁ ≤ f / g₂ :=
map₂_mono_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_right : f₁ ≤ f₂ → f₁ / g ≤ f₂ / g :=
map₂_mono_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem le_div_iff : h ≤ f / g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s / t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (· / ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_swap_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (swap (· / ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
end Div
open Pointwise
/-- Repeated pointwise addition (not the same as pointwise repeated addition!) of a `Filter`. See
Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instNSMul [Zero α] [Add α] : SMul ℕ (Filter α) :=
⟨nsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication (not the same as pointwise repeated multiplication!) of a
`Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instNPow [One α] [Mul α] : Pow (Filter α) ℕ :=
⟨fun s n => npowRec n s⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise addition/subtraction (not the same as pointwise repeated
addition/subtraction!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instZSMul [Zero α] [Add α] [Neg α] : SMul ℤ (Filter α) :=
⟨zsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication/division (not the same as pointwise repeated
multiplication/division!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instZPow [One α] [Mul α] [Inv α] : Pow (Filter α) ℤ :=
⟨fun s n => zpowRec npowRec n s⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instNSMul Filter.instNPow
Filter.instZSMul Filter.instZPow
/-- `Filter α` is a `Semigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def semigroup [Semigroup α] : Semigroup (Filter α) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := map₂_assoc mul_assoc
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commSemigroup [CommSemigroup α] : CommSemigroup (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.semigroup with mul_comm := fun _ _ => map₂_comm mul_comm }
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β]
/-- `Filter α` is a `MulOneClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddZeroClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def mulOneClass : MulOneClass (Filter α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
one_mul := map₂_left_identity one_mul
mul_one := map₂_right_identity mul_one
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.semigroup Filter.addSemigroup
Filter.commSemigroup Filter.addCommSemigroup Filter.mulOneClass Filter.addZeroClass
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- If `φ : α →* β` then `mapMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →* Filter β` induced by `map φ`. -/
@[to_additive "If `φ : α →+ β` then `mapAddMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →+ Filter β` induced by `map φ`."]
def mapMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : Filter α →* Filter β where
toFun := map φ
map_one' := Filter.map_one φ
map_mul' _ _ := Filter.map_mul φ
-- The other direction does not hold in general
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_mul_comap_le [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f g : Filter β} :
f.comap m * g.comap m ≤ (f * g).comap m := fun _ ⟨_, ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, t₁t₂⟩, mt⟩ =>
⟨m ⁻¹' t₁, ⟨t₁, ht₁, Subset.rfl⟩, m ⁻¹' t₂, ⟨t₂, ht₂, Subset.rfl⟩,
(preimage_mul_preimage_subset _).trans <| (preimage_mono t₁t₂).trans mt⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Tendsto.mul_mul [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto m f₁ f₂ → Tendsto m g₁ g₂ → Tendsto m (f₁ * g₁) (f₂ * g₂) := fun hf hg =>
(Filter.map_mul m).trans_le <| mul_le_mul' hf hg
/-- `pure` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α :=
{ pureMulHom, pureOneHom with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMonoidHom : (pureMonoidHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : pureMonoidHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- `Filter α` is a `Monoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def monoid : Monoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.semigroup, @Filter.instNPow α _ _ with }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.monoid Filter.addMonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_pow (hs : s ∈ f) : ∀ n : ℕ, s ^ n ∈ f ^ n
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact one_mem_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_mem_mul (pow_mem_pow hs n) hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_bot]
theorem bot_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (⊥ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊥ := by
rw [← Nat.sub_one_add_one hn, pow_succ', bot_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_top_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : f * ⊤ = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [mul_univ_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem top_mul_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : ⊤ * f = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [univ_mul_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_mul_top : (⊤ : Filter α) * ⊤ = ⊤ :=
mul_top_of_one_le le_top
@[to_additive nsmul_top]
theorem top_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (⊤ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊤
| 0 => fun h => (h rfl).elim
| 1 => fun _ => pow_one _
| n + 2 => fun _ => by rw [pow_succ, top_pow n.succ_ne_zero, top_mul_top]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem _root_.IsUnit.filter : IsUnit a → IsUnit (pure a : Filter α) :=
IsUnit.map (pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α)
end Monoid
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commMonoid [CommMonoid α] : CommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.commSemigroup with }
open Pointwise
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {f g : Filter α}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_eq_one_iff : f * g = 1 ↔ ∃ a b, f = pure a ∧ g = pure b ∧ a * b = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, h⟩ : (1 : Set α) ∈ f * g := hfg.symm ▸ one_mem_one
have hfg : (f * g).NeBot := hfg.symm.subst one_neBot
rw [(hfg.nonempty_of_mem <| mul_mem_mul h₁ h₂).subset_one_iff, Set.mul_eq_one_iff] at h
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a, b, ?_, ?_, h⟩
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_left.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_right.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rintro ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩
rw [pure_mul_pure, h, pure_one]
/-- `Filter α` is a division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is a subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if
`α` is."]
protected def divisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.monoid, Filter.instInvolutiveInv, Filter.instDiv, Filter.instZPow (α := α) with
mul_inv_rev := fun _ _ => map_map₂_antidistrib mul_inv_rev
inv_eq_of_mul := fun s t h => by
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, hab⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 h
rw [inv_pure, inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right hab]
div_eq_mul_inv := fun _ _ => map_map₂_distrib_right div_eq_mul_inv }
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit f ↔ ∃ a, f = pure a ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, h⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.mul_inv
refine ⟨a, ha, ⟨a, b, h, pure_injective ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← pure_mul_pure, ← ha, ← hb]
exact u.inv_mul
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, ha⟩
exact ha.filter
end DivisionMonoid
/-- `Filter α` is a commutative division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive subtractionCommMonoid
"`Filter α` is a commutative subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def divisionCommMonoid [DivisionCommMonoid α] : DivisionCommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.divisionMonoid, Filter.commSemigroup with }
/-- `Filter α` has distributive negation if `α` has. -/
protected def instDistribNeg [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α] : HasDistribNeg (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInvolutiveNeg with
neg_mul := fun _ _ => map₂_map_left_comm neg_mul
mul_neg := fun _ _ => map_map₂_right_comm mul_neg }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.commMonoid Filter.addCommMonoid Filter.divisionMonoid
Filter.subtractionMonoid Filter.divisionCommMonoid Filter.subtractionCommMonoid
Filter.instDistribNeg
section Distrib
variable [Distrib α] {f g h : Filter α}
/-!
Note that `Filter α` is not a `Distrib` because `f * g + f * h` has cross terms that `f * (g + h)`
lacks.
-/
theorem mul_add_subset : f * (g + h) ≤ f * g + f * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_left mul_add
theorem add_mul_subset : (f + g) * h ≤ f * h + g * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_right add_mul
end Distrib
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {f g : Filter α}
/-! Note that `Filter` is not a `MulZeroClass` because `0 * ⊥ ≠ 0`. -/
theorem NeBot.mul_zero_nonneg (hf : f.NeBot) : 0 ≤ f * 0 :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := hf.nonempty_of_mem h₁
⟨_, ha, _, h₂, mul_zero _⟩
theorem NeBot.zero_mul_nonneg (hg : g.NeBot) : 0 ≤ 0 * g :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, hb⟩ := hg.nonempty_of_mem h₂
⟨_, h₁, _, hb, zero_mul _⟩
end MulZeroClass
section Group
variable [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(m : F) {f g f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β}
/-! Note that `Filter α` is not a group because `f / f ≠ 1` in general -/
-- Porting note: increase priority to appease `simpNF` so left-hand side doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
protected theorem one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ f / g ↔ ¬Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := hfg.le_bot (mem_bot : ∅ ∈ ⊥)
exact Set.one_mem_div_iff.1 (h <| div_mem_div hs ht) (disjoint_iff.2 hst.symm)
· rintro h s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
exact hs (Set.one_mem_div_iff.2 fun ht => h <| disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem ht h₁ h₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem not_one_le_div_iff : ¬1 ≤ f / g ↔ Disjoint f g :=
Filter.one_le_div_iff.not_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.one_le_div (h : f.NeBot) : 1 ≤ f / f := by
rintro s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 (h.not_disjoint h₁ h₂)
rw [mem_one, ← div_self' a]
exact hs (Set.div_mem_div ha₁ ha₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_pure (a : α) : IsUnit (pure a : Filter α) :=
(Group.isUnit a).filter
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff_singleton : IsUnit f ↔ ∃ a, f = pure a := by
| simp only [isUnit_iff, Group.isUnit, and_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inv' : f⁻¹.map m = (f.map m)⁻¹ :=
Semiconj.filter_map (map_inv m) f
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Pointwise.lean | 716 | 720 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`"]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator` for the version with `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator` for the version with `s`."]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator' : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) 1 sᶜ :=
fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hx f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator {t : Set β} {g : β → M} {b : β}
(h1 : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) (h2 : f a = g b) :
s.mulIndicator f a = t.mulIndicator g b := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp_all
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_eq_mulIndicator_const {t : Set β} {b : β} {c : M} (h : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) :
s.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) a = t.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) b :=
mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator h rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all +contextual
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by
simp only [mulIndicator, Function.comp]
split_ifs with h h' h'' <;> first | rfl | contradiction
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_image {s : Set α} {f : β → M} {g : α → β} (hg : Injective g) {x : α} :
mulIndicator (g '' s) f (g x) = mulIndicator s (f ∘ g) x := by
rw [← mulIndicator_comp_right, preimage_image_eq _ hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_of_one {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) :
mulIndicator s (g ∘ f) = g ∘ mulIndicator s f := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator_const (c : M) (f : M → N) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
(fun x => f (s.mulIndicator (fun _ => c) x)) = s.mulIndicator fun _ => f c :=
(mulIndicator_comp_of_one hf).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (B : Set M) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' B = s.ite (f ⁻¹' B) (1 ⁻¹' B) :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
piecewise_preimage s f 1 B
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_one_preimage (s : Set M) :
t.mulIndicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_one', preimage_one]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) [Decidable (a ∈ s)]
[Decidable ((1 : M) ∈ s)] : (U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s =
(if a ∈ s then U else ∅) ∪ if (1 : M) ∈ s then Uᶜ else ∅ := by
rw [mulIndicator_preimage, preimage_one, preimage_const]
split_ifs <;> simp [← compl_eq_univ_diff]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) :
(U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
| rw [mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union]
split_ifs <;> simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 255 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Finite intervals in a disjoint union
This file provides the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for the disjoint sum and linear sum of two
orders and calculates the cardinality of their finite intervals.
-/
open Function Sum
namespace Finset
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ γ₁ γ₂ : Type*}
section SumLift₂
variable (f f₁ g₁ : α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁) (g f₂ g₂ : α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
/-- Lifts maps `α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁` and `α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂` to a map
`α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)`. Could be generalized to `Alternative` functors if we can
make sure to keep computability and universe polymorphism. -/
@[simp]
def sumLift₂ : ∀ (_ : α₁ ⊕ α₂) (_ : β₁ ⊕ β₂), Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)
| inl a, inl b => (f a b).map Embedding.inl
| inl _, inr _ => ∅
| inr _, inl _ => ∅
| inr a, inr b => (g a b).map Embedding.inr
variable {f f₁ g₁ g f₂ g₂} {a : α₁ ⊕ α₂} {b : β₁ ⊕ β₂} {c : γ₁ ⊕ γ₂}
theorem mem_sumLift₂ :
c ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f a₁ b₁) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂ c₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g a₂ b₂ := by
constructor
· rcases a with a | a <;> rcases b with b | b
· rw [sumLift₂, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· refine fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· refine fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· rw [sumLift₂, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· rintro (⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, h⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, h⟩) <;> exact mem_map_of_mem _ h
theorem inl_mem_sumLift₂ {c₁ : γ₁} :
inl c₁ ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔ ∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f a₁ b₁ := by
rw [mem_sumLift₂, or_iff_left]
· simp only [inl.injEq, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left']
rintro ⟨_, _, c₂, _, _, h, _⟩
exact inl_ne_inr h
theorem inr_mem_sumLift₂ {c₂ : γ₂} :
inr c₂ ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔ ∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g a₂ b₂ := by
rw [mem_sumLift₂, or_iff_right]
· simp only [inr.injEq, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left']
rintro ⟨_, _, c₂, _, _, h, _⟩
exact inr_ne_inl h
theorem sumLift₂_eq_empty :
sumLift₂ f g a b = ∅ ↔
(∀ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ → b = inl b₁ → f a₁ b₁ = ∅) ∧
∀ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ → b = inr b₂ → g a₂ b₂ = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· constructor <;>
· rintro a b rfl rfl
exact map_eq_empty.1 h
cases a <;> cases b
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.1 _ _ rfl rfl)
· rfl
· rfl
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.2 _ _ rfl rfl)
theorem sumLift₂_nonempty :
(sumLift₂ f g a b).Nonempty ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ (f a₁ b₁).Nonempty) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ (g a₂ b₂).Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sumLift₂_eq_empty, not_and_or, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem sumLift₂_mono (h₁ : ∀ a b, f₁ a b ⊆ g₁ a b) (h₂ : ∀ a b, f₂ a b ⊆ g₂ a b) :
∀ a b, sumLift₂ f₁ f₂ a b ⊆ sumLift₂ g₁ g₂ a b
| inl _, inl _ => map_subset_map.2 (h₁ _ _)
| inl _, inr _ => Subset.rfl
| inr _, inl _ => Subset.rfl
| inr _, inr _ => map_subset_map.2 (h₂ _ _)
end SumLift₂
section SumLexLift
variable (f₁ f₁' : α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁) (f₂ f₂' : α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
(g₁ g₁' : α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₁) (g₂ g₂' : α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
/-- Lifts maps `α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁`, `α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂`, `α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₁`,
`α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂` to a map `α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)`. Could be generalized to
alternative monads if we can make sure to keep computability and universe polymorphism. -/
def sumLexLift : α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)
| inl a, inl b => (f₁ a b).map Embedding.inl
| inl a, inr b => (g₁ a b).disjSum (g₂ a b)
| inr _, inl _ => ∅
| inr a, inr b => (f₂ a b).map ⟨_, inr_injective⟩
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inl_inl (a : α₁) (b : β₁) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inl a) (inl b) = (f₁ a b).map Embedding.inl := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inl_inr (a : α₁) (b : β₂) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inl a) (inr b) = (g₁ a b).disjSum (g₂ a b) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inr_inl (a : α₂) (b : β₁) : sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inr a) (inl b) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inr_inr (a : α₂) (b : β₂) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inr a) (inr b) = (f₂ a b).map ⟨_, inr_injective⟩ := rfl
variable {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ f₁' g₁' f₂' g₂'} {a : α₁ ⊕ α₂} {b : β₁ ⊕ β₂} {c : γ₁ ⊕ γ₂}
lemma mem_sumLexLift :
c ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f₁ a₁ b₁) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ g₁ a₁ b₂) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂ c₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g₂ a₁ b₂) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂ c₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
constructor
· obtain a | a := a <;> obtain b | b := b
· rw [sumLexLift, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· refine fun h ↦ (mem_disjSum.1 h).elim ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· exact fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· rw [sumLexLift, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· rintro (⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ |
⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· exact mem_map_of_mem _ hc
· exact inl_mem_disjSum.2 hc
· exact inr_mem_disjSum.2 hc
· exact mem_map_of_mem _ hc
lemma inl_mem_sumLexLift {c₁ : γ₁} :
inl c₁ ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f₁ a₁ b₁) ∨
∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₁ ∈ g₁ a₁ b₂ := by
simp [mem_sumLexLift]
lemma inr_mem_sumLexLift {c₂ : γ₂} :
inr c₂ ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g₂ a₁ b₂) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
simp [mem_sumLexLift]
lemma sumLexLift_mono (hf₁ : ∀ a b, f₁ a b ⊆ f₁' a b) (hf₂ : ∀ a b, f₂ a b ⊆ f₂' a b)
(hg₁ : ∀ a b, g₁ a b ⊆ g₁' a b) (hg₂ : ∀ a b, g₂ a b ⊆ g₂' a b) (a : α₁ ⊕ α₂)
(b : β₁ ⊕ β₂) : sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ⊆ sumLexLift f₁' f₂' g₁' g₂' a b := by
cases a <;> cases b
exacts [map_subset_map.2 (hf₁ _ _), disjSum_mono (hg₁ _ _) (hg₂ _ _), Subset.rfl,
map_subset_map.2 (hf₂ _ _)]
lemma sumLexLift_eq_empty :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b = ∅ ↔
(∀ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ → b = inl b₁ → f₁ a₁ b₁ = ∅) ∧
(∀ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ → b = inr b₂ → g₁ a₁ b₂ = ∅ ∧ g₂ a₁ b₂ = ∅) ∧
∀ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ → b = inr b₂ → f₂ a₂ b₂ = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
any_goals rintro a b rfl rfl; exact map_eq_empty.1 h
· rintro a b rfl rfl; exact disjSum_eq_empty.1 h
cases a <;> cases b
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.1 _ _ rfl rfl)
· simp [h.2.1 _ _ rfl rfl]
· rfl
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.2.2 _ _ rfl rfl)
lemma sumLexLift_nonempty :
(sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b).Nonempty ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ (f₁ a₁ b₁).Nonempty) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ ((g₁ a₁ b₂).Nonempty ∨ (g₂ a₁ b₂).Nonempty)) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ (f₂ a₂ b₂).Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sumLexLift_eq_empty, not_and_or, exists_prop, not_forall]
end SumLexLift
end Finset
open Finset Function
namespace Sum
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Disjoint sum of orders -/
section Disjoint
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (α ⊕ β) where
finsetIcc := sumLift₂ Icc Icc
finsetIco := sumLift₂ Ico Ico
finsetIoc := sumLift₂ Ioc Ioc
finsetIoo := sumLift₂ Ioo Ioo
finset_mem_Icc := by simp
finset_mem_Ico := by simp
finset_mem_Ioc := by simp
finset_mem_Ioo := by simp
variable (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β)
theorem Icc_inl_inl : Icc (inl a₁ : α ⊕ β) (inl a₂) = (Icc a₁ a₂).map Embedding.inl :=
rfl
theorem Ico_inl_inl : Ico (inl a₁ : α ⊕ β) (inl a₂) = (Ico a₁ a₂).map Embedding.inl :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_inl_inl : Ioc (inl a₁ : α ⊕ β) (inl a₂) = (Ioc a₁ a₂).map Embedding.inl :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_inl_inl : Ioo (inl a₁ : α ⊕ β) (inl a₂) = (Ioo a₁ a₂).map Embedding.inl :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inl_inr : Icc (inl a₁) (inr b₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inl_inr : Ico (inl a₁) (inr b₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_inl_inr : Ioc (inl a₁) (inr b₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_inl_inr : Ioo (inl a₁) (inr b₂) = ∅ := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inr_inl : Icc (inr b₁) (inl a₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inr_inl : Ico (inr b₁) (inl a₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_inr_inl : Ioc (inr b₁) (inl a₂) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_inr_inl : Ioo (inr b₁) (inl a₂) = ∅ := by
rfl
theorem Icc_inr_inr : Icc (inr b₁ : α ⊕ β) (inr b₂) = (Icc b₁ b₂).map Embedding.inr :=
rfl
theorem Ico_inr_inr : Ico (inr b₁ : α ⊕ β) (inr b₂) = (Ico b₁ b₂).map Embedding.inr :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_inr_inr : Ioc (inr b₁ : α ⊕ β) (inr b₂) = (Ioc b₁ b₂).map Embedding.inr :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_inr_inr : Ioo (inr b₁ : α ⊕ β) (inr b₂) = (Ioo b₁ b₂).map Embedding.inr :=
rfl
end Disjoint
/-! ### Lexicographical sum of orders -/
namespace Lex
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [OrderTop α] [OrderBot β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
[LocallyFiniteOrder β]
/-- Throwaway tactic. -/
local elab "simp_lex" : tactic => do
Lean.Elab.Tactic.evalTactic <| ← `(tactic|
refine toLex.surjective.forall₃.2 ?_;
rintro (a | a) (b | b) (c | c) <;> simp)
instance locallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (α ⊕ₗ β) where
finsetIcc a b :=
(sumLexLift Icc Icc (fun a _ => Ici a) (fun _ => Iic) (ofLex a) (ofLex b)).map toLex.toEmbedding
finsetIco a b :=
(sumLexLift Ico Ico (fun a _ => Ici a) (fun _ => Iio) (ofLex a) (ofLex b)).map toLex.toEmbedding
| finsetIoc a b :=
(sumLexLift Ioc Ioc (fun a _ => Ioi a) (fun _ => Iic) (ofLex a) (ofLex b)).map toLex.toEmbedding
| Mathlib/Data/Sum/Interval.lean | 299 | 300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
/-! # Conditional expectation in L1
This file contains two more steps of the construction of the conditional expectation, which is
completed in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic`. See that file for a
description of the full process.
The conditional expectation of an `L²` function is defined in
`MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2`. In this file, we perform two steps.
* Show that the conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure
is integrable and define a map `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E))` which to a set associates a linear
map. That linear map sends `x ∈ E` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set
with value `x`.
* Extend that map to `condExpL1CLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E)`. This is done using the same
construction as the Bochner integral (see the file `MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1`).
## Main definitions
* `condExpL1`: Conditional expectation of a function as a linear map from `L1` to itself.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' G G' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
-- G for a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G]
-- G' for integrals on a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedSpace ℝ G'] [CompleteSpace G']
section CondexpInd
/-! ## Conditional expectation of an indicator as a continuous linear map.
The goal of this section is to build
`condExpInd (hm : m ≤ m0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set s) : G →L[ℝ] α →₁[μ] G`, which
takes `x : G` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set `s` with value `x`,
seen as an element of `α →₁[μ] G`.
-/
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section CondexpIndL1Fin
/-- Conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure,
as a function in L1. -/
def condExpIndL1Fin (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) : α →₁[μ] G :=
(integrable_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).toL1 _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] noncomputable alias condexpIndL1Fin := condExpIndL1Fin
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x =ᵐ[μ] condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x :=
(integrable_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).coeFn_toL1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul := condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul
variable {hm : m ≤ m0} [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
-- Porting note: this lemma fills the hole in `refine' (MemLp.coeFn_toLp _) ...`
-- which is not automatically filled in Lean 4
private theorem q {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {x : G} :
MemLp (condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x) 1 μ := by
rw [memLp_one_iff_integrable]; apply integrable_condExpIndSMul
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x y : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (x + y) =
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x + condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs y := by
ext1
refine (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).symm (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).symm)
rw [condExpIndSMul_add]
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans (Eventually.of_forall fun a => ?_)
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndL1Fin_add := condExpIndL1Fin_add
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_smul (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ) (x : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x := by
ext1
refine (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
rw [condExpIndSMul_smul hs hμs c x]
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun y hy => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndL1Fin_smul := condExpIndL1Fin_smul
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_smul' [NormedSpace ℝ F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : 𝕜) (x : F) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x := by
ext1
refine (MemLp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
rw [condExpIndSMul_smul' hs hμs c x]
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun y hy => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpIndL1Fin_smul' := condExpIndL1Fin_smul'
theorem norm_condExpIndL1Fin_le (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
‖condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x‖ ≤ μ.real s * ‖x‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_eq_integral_norm, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg x), measureReal_def,
← ENNReal.toReal_mul,
← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal (ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top),
ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_enorm]
swap; · rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]; exact Lp.memLp _
have h_eq :
∫⁻ a, ‖condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x a‖ₑ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ‖condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x a‖ₑ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
refine (condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun z hz => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hz]
rw [h_eq, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
| exact lintegral_nnnorm_condExpIndSMul_le hm hs hμs x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias norm_condexpIndL1Fin_le := norm_condExpIndL1Fin_le
theorem condExpIndL1Fin_disjoint_union (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (hst : Disjoint s t) (x : G) :
condExpIndL1Fin hm (hs.union ht) ((measure_union_le s t).trans_lt
(lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr ⟨hμs, hμt⟩))).ne x =
condExpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x + condExpIndL1Fin hm ht hμt x := by
ext1
have hμst := measure_union_ne_top hμs hμt
refine (condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm (hs.union ht) hμst x).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
have hs_eq := condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm hs hμs x
have ht_eq := condExpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condExpIndSMul hm ht hμt x
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (EventuallyEq.add hs_eq.symm ht_eq.symm)
rw [condExpIndSMul]
rw [indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union hs ht hμs hμt hst (1 : ℝ)]
rw [(condExpL2 ℝ ℝ hm).map_add]
push_cast
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/CondexpL1.lean | 146 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.PreservesHomology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Injective.Basic
/-!
# Exact short complexes
When `S : ShortComplex C`, this file defines a structure
`S.Exact` which expresses the exactness of `S`, i.e. there
exists a homology data `h : S.HomologyData` such that
`h.left.H` is zero. When `[S.HasHomology]`, it is equivalent
to the assertion `IsZero S.homology`.
Almost by construction, this notion of exactness is self dual,
see `Exact.op` and `Exact.unop`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits ZeroObject Preadditive
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace ShortComplex
section
variable
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The assertion that the short complex `S : ShortComplex C` is exact. -/
structure Exact : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists an homology data whose `left.H` field is zero -/
condition : ∃ (h : S.HomologyData), IsZero h.left.H
variable {S}
lemma Exact.hasHomology (h : S.Exact) : S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' h.condition.choose
lemma Exact.hasZeroObject (h : S.Exact) : HasZeroObject C :=
⟨h.condition.choose.left.H, h.condition.choose_spec⟩
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_homology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.homology := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨h', z⟩⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso z h'.left.homologyIso
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_leftHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.leftHomology :=
LeftHomologyData.exact_iff _
lemma exact_iff_isZero_rightHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.rightHomology :=
RightHomologyData.exact_iff _
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.left.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact LeftHomologyData.exact_iff h.left
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff' (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.right.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact RightHomologyData.exact_iff h.right
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_homology_iso_zero [S.HasHomology] [HasZeroObject C] :
S.Exact ↔ Nonempty (S.homology ≅ 0) := by
rw [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isoZero⟩
· rintro ⟨e⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso (isZero_zero C) e
lemma exact_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : S₁.Exact) : S₂.Exact := by
obtain ⟨⟨h, z⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨HomologyData.ofIso e h, z⟩⟩
lemma exact_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact :=
⟨exact_of_iso e, exact_of_iso e.symm⟩
lemma exact_and_mono_f_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Mono S₁.f ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Mono S₂.f := by
have : Mono S₁.f ↔ Mono S₂.f :=
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₁.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₁₂)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_and_epi_g_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Epi S₁.g ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Epi S₂.g := by
have : Epi S₁.g ↔ Epi S₂.g :=
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₃.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₂₃)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_of_isZero_X₂ (h : IsZero S.X₂) : S.Exact := by
rw [(HomologyData.ofZeros S (IsZero.eq_of_tgt h _ _) (IsZero.eq_of_src h _ _)).exact_iff]
exact h
lemma exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, z₁⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁, z₁⟩
· rintro ⟨h₂, z₂⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h₂, z₂⟩
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff_i_p_zero (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h.left.i ≫ h.right.p = 0 := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
rw [h.left.exact_iff, ← h.comm]
constructor
· intro z
rw [IsZero.eq_of_src z h.iso.hom 0, zero_comp, comp_zero]
· intro eq
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.iso.hom, id_comp, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι,
← cancel_epi h.left.π, eq, zero_comp, comp_zero]
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_i_p_zero [S.HasHomology] (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h₁.i ≫ h₂.p = 0 :=
(HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂).exact_iff_i_p_zero
lemma exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 :=
S.exact_iff_i_p_zero _ _
lemma exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero [S.HasHomology]
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
haveI := HasLeftHomology.hasCokernel S
haveI := HasRightHomology.hasKernel S
exact S.exact_iff_i_p_zero (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
(RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
variable {S}
lemma Exact.op (h : S.Exact) : S.op.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.op, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).op⟩⟩
lemma Exact.unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.Exact) : S.unop.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.unop, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).unop⟩⟩
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma exact_op_iff : S.op.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
⟨Exact.unop, Exact.op⟩
@[simp]
lemma exact_unop_iff (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) : S.unop.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
S.unop.exact_op_iff.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesRightHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have : S.HasHomology := h.hasHomology
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
exact h.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf F
variable (S)
lemma exact_map_iff_of_faithful [S.HasHomology]
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] [F.Faithful] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ S.Exact := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero]
rw [(S.leftHomologyData.map F).exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
LeftHomologyData.map_H] at h
apply F.map_injective
rw [F.map_id, F.map_zero, h]
· intro h
exact h.map F
variable {S}
@[reassoc]
lemma Exact.comp_eq_zero (h : S.Exact) {X Y : C} {a : X ⟶ S.X₂} (ha : a ≫ S.g = 0)
{b : S.X₂ ⟶ Y} (hb : S.f ≫ b = 0) : a ≫ b = 0 := by
have := h.hasHomology
have eq := h
rw [exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero] at eq
rw [← S.liftCycles_i a ha, ← S.p_descOpcycles b hb, assoc, reassoc_of% eq,
zero_comp, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.isZero_of_both_zeros (ex : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
IsZero S.X₂ :=
(ShortComplex.HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg).exact_iff.1 ex
end
section Preadditive
variable [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D] (S : ShortComplex C)
lemma exact_iff_mono [HasZeroObject C] (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono S.g := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
have := mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ S.homologyIsKernel h
rw [← S.p_fromOpcycles]
apply mono_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero (KernelFork.ofι (0 : 0 ⟶ S.X₂) zero_comp)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
lemma exact_iff_epi [HasZeroObject C] (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi S.f := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
haveI := S.isIso_iCycles hg
haveI : Epi S.toCycles := epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ S.homologyIsCokernel h
rw [← S.toCycles_i]
apply epi_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero (CokernelCofork.ofπ (0 : S.X₂ ⟶ 0) comp_zero)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
variable {S}
lemma Exact.epi_f' (hS : S.Exact) (h : LeftHomologyData S) : Epi h.f' :=
epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ h.hπ (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.mono_g' (hS : S.Exact) (h : RightHomologyData S) : Mono h.g' :=
mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ h.hι (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.epi_toCycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasLeftHomology] : Epi S.toCycles :=
hS.epi_f' _
lemma Exact.mono_fromOpcycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasRightHomology] : Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
hS.mono_g' _
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f' [S.HasHomology] (h : LeftHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi h.f' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.epi_f' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_epi h.π, ← cancel_epi h.f',
comp_id, h.f'_π, comp_zero]
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g' [S.HasHomology] (h : RightHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono h.g' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.mono_g' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.ι, ← cancel_mono h.g',
id_comp, h.ι_g', zero_comp]
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a limit kernel fork `kf` for `S.g`, this is the
left homology data for `S` with `K := kf.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.leftHomologyDataOfIsLimitKernelFork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (kf : KernelFork S.g) (hkf : IsLimit kf) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kf.pt
H := 0
i := kf.ι
π := 0
wi := kf.condition
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hkf (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wπ := comp_zero
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).1
hS.epi_toCycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso S.cyclesIsKernel hkf) ?_
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hkf
simp [IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a colimit cokernel cofork `cc` for `S.f`, this is the
right homology data for `S` with `Q := cc.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.rightHomologyDataOfIsColimitCokernelCofork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (cc : CokernelCofork S.f) (hcc : IsColimit cc) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := cc.pt
H := 0
p := cc.π
ι := 0
wp := cc.condition
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hcc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := zero_comp
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).2
hS.mono_fromOpcycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hcc S.opcyclesIsCokernel)
(Iso.refl _) ?_
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hcc
simp [IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_epi_toCycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Epi S.toCycles :=
S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f'
lemma exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g'
lemma exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift [S.HasHomology] [HasKernel S.g] :
S.Exact ↔ Epi (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _) S.cyclesIsoKernel (by aesop_cat)
lemma exact_iff_mono_cokernel_desc [S.HasHomology] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ Mono (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
refine (MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff (Iso.symm ?_)
exact Arrow.isoMk S.opcyclesIsoCokernel.symm (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
lemma QuasiIso.exact_iff {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] [QuasiIso φ] : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff (asIso (homologyMap φ))
lemma exact_of_f_is_kernel (hS : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.f S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
have : IsSplitEpi S.toCycles :=
⟨⟨{ section_ := hS.lift (KernelFork.ofι S.iCycles S.iCycles_g)
id := by
rw [← cancel_mono S.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i, id_comp]
exact Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
lemma exact_of_g_is_cokernel (hS : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.g S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
have : IsSplitMono S.fromOpcycles :=
⟨⟨{ retraction := hS.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.pOpcycles S.f_pOpcycles)
id := by
rw [← cancel_epi S.pOpcycles, p_fromOpcycles_assoc, comp_id]
exact Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
variable {S}
lemma Exact.mono_g (hS : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) : Mono S.g := by
have := hS.hasHomology
have := hS.epi_toCycles
have : S.iCycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_epi S.toCycles, comp_zero, toCycles_i, hf]
apply Preadditive.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.liftCycles_i x₂ hx₂, this, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.epi_f (hS : S.Exact) (hg : S.g = 0) : Epi S.f := by
have := hS.hasHomology
have := hS.mono_fromOpcycles
have : S.pOpcycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_mono S.fromOpcycles, zero_comp, p_fromOpcycles, hg]
apply Preadditive.epi_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.p_descOpcycles x₂ hx₂, this, zero_comp]
lemma Exact.mono_g_iff (hS : S.Exact) : Mono S.g ↔ S.f = 0 := by
constructor
· intro
rw [← cancel_mono S.g, zero, zero_comp]
· exact hS.mono_g
lemma Exact.epi_f_iff (hS : S.Exact) : Epi S.f ↔ S.g = 0 := by
constructor
· intro
rw [← cancel_epi S.f, zero, comp_zero]
· exact hS.epi_f
lemma Exact.isZero_X₂ (hS : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : IsZero S.X₂ := by
have := hS.mono_g hf
rw [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono S.g, hg, comp_zero, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.isZero_X₂_iff (hS : S.Exact) : IsZero S.X₂ ↔ S.f = 0 ∧ S.g = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.eq_of_tgt _ _, h.eq_of_src _ _⟩
· rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
exact hS.isZero_X₂ hf hg
variable (S)
/-- A splitting for a short complex `S` consists of the data of a retraction `r : X₂ ⟶ X₁`
of `S.f` and section `s : X₃ ⟶ X₂` of `S.g` which satisfy `r ≫ S.f + S.g ≫ s = 𝟙 _` -/
structure Splitting (S : ShortComplex C) where
/-- a retraction of `S.f` -/
r : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₁
/-- a section of `S.g` -/
s : S.X₃ ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the condition that `r` is a retraction of `S.f` -/
f_r : S.f ≫ r = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
/-- the condition that `s` is a section of `S.g` -/
s_g : s ≫ S.g = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
/-- the compatibility between the given section and retraction -/
id : r ≫ S.f + S.g ≫ s = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
namespace Splitting
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] f_r s_g
variable {S}
@[reassoc]
lemma r_f (s : S.Splitting) : s.r ≫ S.f = 𝟙 _ - S.g ≫ s.s := by rw [← s.id, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[reassoc]
lemma g_s (s : S.Splitting) : S.g ≫ s.s = 𝟙 _ - s.r ≫ S.f := by rw [← s.id, add_sub_cancel_left]
/-- Given a splitting of a short complex `S`, this shows that `S.f` is a split monomorphism. -/
@[simps] def splitMono_f (s : S.Splitting) : SplitMono S.f := ⟨s.r, s.f_r⟩
lemma isSplitMono_f (s : S.Splitting) : IsSplitMono S.f := ⟨⟨s.splitMono_f⟩⟩
lemma mono_f (s : S.Splitting) : Mono S.f := by
have := s.isSplitMono_f
infer_instance
/-- Given a splitting of a short complex `S`, this shows that `S.g` is a split epimorphism. -/
@[simps] def splitEpi_g (s : S.Splitting) : SplitEpi S.g := ⟨s.s, s.s_g⟩
lemma isSplitEpi_g (s : S.Splitting) : IsSplitEpi S.g := ⟨⟨s.splitEpi_g⟩⟩
lemma epi_g (s : S.Splitting) : Epi S.g := by
have := s.isSplitEpi_g
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma s_r (s : S.Splitting) : s.s ≫ s.r = 0 := by
have := s.epi_g
simp only [← cancel_epi S.g, comp_zero, g_s_assoc, sub_comp, id_comp,
assoc, f_r, comp_id, sub_self]
lemma ext_r (s s' : S.Splitting) (h : s.r = s'.r) : s = s' := by
have := s.epi_g
have eq := s.id
rw [← s'.id, h, add_right_inj, cancel_epi S.g] at eq
cases s
cases s'
obtain rfl := eq
obtain rfl := h
rfl
lemma ext_s (s s' : S.Splitting) (h : s.s = s'.s) : s = s' := by
have := s.mono_f
have eq := s.id
rw [← s'.id, h, add_left_inj, cancel_mono S.f] at eq
cases s
cases s'
obtain rfl := eq
obtain rfl := h
rfl
| /-- The left homology data on a short complex equipped with a splitting. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyData [HasZeroObject C] (s : S.Splitting) :
LeftHomologyData S := by
have hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι S.f S.zero
(fun x _ => x ≫ s.r)
(fun x hx => by simp only [assoc, s.r_f, comp_sub, comp_id,
sub_eq_self, reassoc_of% hx, zero_comp])
(fun x _ b hb => by simp only [← hb, assoc, f_r, comp_id])
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Exact.lean | 538 | 546 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
| /-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 258 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
| simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 134 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
/-!
# Compositions
A composition of a natural number `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum
of positive integers. Combinatorially, it corresponds to a decomposition of `{0, ..., n-1}` into
non-empty blocks of consecutive integers, where the `iⱼ` are the lengths of the blocks.
This notion is closely related to that of a partition of `n`, but in a composition of `n` the
order of the `iⱼ`s matters.
We implement two different structures covering these two viewpoints on compositions. The first
one, made of a list of positive integers summing to `n`, is the main one and is called
`Composition n`. The second one is useful for combinatorial arguments (for instance to show that
the number of compositions of `n` is `2^(n-1)`). It is given by a subset of `{0, ..., n}`
containing `0` and `n`, where the elements of the subset (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost
points of each block. The main API is built on `Composition n`, and we provide an equivalence
between the two types.
## Main functions
* `c : Composition n` is a structure, made of a list of integers which are all positive and
add up to `n`.
* `composition_card` states that the cardinality of `Composition n` is exactly
`2^(n-1)`, which is proved by constructing an equiv with `CompositionAsSet n` (see below), which
is itself in bijection with the subsets of `Fin (n-1)` (this holds even for `n = 0`, where `-` is
nat subtraction).
Let `c : Composition n` be a composition of `n`. Then
* `c.blocks` is the list of blocks in `c`.
* `c.length` is the number of blocks in the composition.
* `c.blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ` is the realization of `c.blocks` as a function on
`Fin c.length`. This is the main object when using compositions to understand the composition of
analytic functions.
* `c.sizeUpTo : ℕ → ℕ` is the sum of the size of the blocks up to `i`.;
* `c.embedding i : Fin (c.blocksFun i) → Fin n` is the increasing embedding of the `i`-th block in
`Fin n`;
* `c.index j`, for `j : Fin n`, is the index of the block containing `j`.
* `Composition.ones n` is the composition of `n` made of ones, i.e., `[1, ..., 1]`.
* `Composition.single n (hn : 0 < n)` is the composition of `n` made of a single block of size `n`.
Compositions can also be used to split lists. Let `l` be a list of length `n` and `c` a composition
of `n`.
* `l.splitWrtComposition c` is a list of lists, made of the slices of `l` corresponding to the
blocks of `c`.
* `join_splitWrtComposition` states that splitting a list and then joining it gives back the
original list.
* `splitWrtComposition_join` states that joining a list of lists, and then splitting it back
according to the right composition, gives back the original list of lists.
We turn to the second viewpoint on compositions, that we realize as a finset of `Fin (n+1)`.
`c : CompositionAsSet n` is a structure made of a finset of `Fin (n+1)` called `c.boundaries`
and proofs that it contains `0` and `n`. (Taking a finset of `Fin n` containing `0` would not
make sense in the edge case `n = 0`, while the previous description works in all cases).
The elements of this set (other than `n`) correspond to leftmost points of blocks.
Thus, there is an equiv between `Composition n` and `CompositionAsSet n`. We
only construct basic API on `CompositionAsSet` (notably `c.length` and `c.blocks`) to be able
to construct this equiv, called `compositionEquiv n`. Since there is a straightforward equiv
between `CompositionAsSet n` and finsets of `{1, ..., n-1}` (obtained by removing `0` and `n`
from a `CompositionAsSet` and called `compositionAsSetEquiv n`), we deduce that
`CompositionAsSet n` and `Composition n` are both fintypes of cardinality `2^(n - 1)`
(see `compositionAsSet_card` and `composition_card`).
## Implementation details
The main motivation for this structure and its API is in the construction of the composition of
formal multilinear series, and the proof that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The representation of a composition as a list is very handy as lists are very flexible and already
have a well-developed API.
## Tags
Composition, partition
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_(combinatorics)>
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- A composition of `n` is a list of positive integers summing to `n`. -/
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
/-- List of positive integers summing to `n` -/
blocks : List ℕ
/-- Proof of positivity for `blocks` -/
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
/-- Proof that `blocks` sums to `n` -/
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
deriving DecidableEq
attribute [simp] Composition.blocks_sum
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n`, by seeing it as non-empty blocks of
consecutive integers in `{0, ..., n-1}`. We register every block by its left end-point, yielding
a finset containing `0`. As this does not make sense for `n = 0`, we add `n` to this finset, and
get a finset of `{0, ..., n}` containing `0` and `n`. This is the data in the structure
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
/-- Combinatorial viewpoint on a composition of `n` as consecutive integers `{0, ..., n-1}` -/
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
/-- Proof that `0` is a member of `boundaries` -/
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
/-- Last element of the composition -/
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
deriving DecidableEq
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
attribute [simp] CompositionAsSet.zero_mem CompositionAsSet.getLast_mem
/-!
### Compositions
A composition of an integer `n` is a decomposition `n = i₀ + ... + i_{k-1}` of `n` into a sum of
positive integers.
-/
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
/-- The length of a composition, i.e., the number of blocks in the composition. -/
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
/-- The blocks of a composition, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. When composing analytic
functions using compositions, this is the main player. -/
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
@[simp]
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
theorem blocks_le {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : i ≤ n := by
rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact List.le_sum_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) _)
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks[i] :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
@[simp]
theorem blocksFun_le {n} (c : Composition n) (i : Fin c.length) :
c.blocksFun i ≤ n :=
c.blocks_le <| getElem_mem _
@[simp]
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
@[simp]
theorem blocks_eq_nil : c.blocks = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa using congr(List.sum $h)
· rintro rfl
rw [← length_eq_zero_iff, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact c.length_le
protected theorem length_eq_zero : c.length = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem length_pos_iff : 0 < c.length ↔ 0 < n := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_pos⟩ := length_pos_iff
/-- The sum of the sizes of the blocks in a composition up to `i`. -/
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_of_length_le h
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks[i] := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
/-- The `i`-th boundary of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of the `i`-th block. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
/-- The boundaries of a composition, i.e., the leftmost point of all the blocks. We include
a virtual point at the right of the last block, to make for a nice equiv with
`CompositionAsSet n`. -/
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
/-- To `c : Composition n`, one can associate a `CompositionAsSet n` by registering the leftmost
point of each block, and adding a virtual point at the right of the last block. -/
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
/-- The canonical increasing bijection between `Fin (c.length + 1)` and `c.boundaries` is
exactly `c.boundary`. -/
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
/-- Embedding the `i`-th block of a composition (identified with `Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) into
`Fin n` at the relevant position. -/
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
/-- `index_exists` asserts there is some `i` with `j < c.sizeUpTo (i+1)`.
In the next definition `index` we use `Nat.find` to produce the minimal such index.
-/
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
/-- `c.index j` is the index of the block in the composition `c` containing `j`. -/
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
/-- Mapping an element `j` of `Fin n` to the element in the block containing it, identified with
`Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j))` through the canonical increasing bijection. -/
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
/-- The embeddings of different blocks of a composition are disjoint. -/
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff' {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ i = c.index j := by
constructor
· rw [← not_imp_not]
intro h
exact Set.disjoint_right.1 (c.disjoint_range h) (c.mem_range_embedding j)
· intro h
rw [h]
exact c.mem_range_embedding j
theorem index_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
c.index (c.embedding i j) = i := by
symm
rw [← mem_range_embedding_iff']
apply Set.mem_range_self
theorem invEmbedding_comp (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.invEmbedding (c.embedding i j) : ℕ) = j := by
simp_rw [coe_invEmbedding, index_embedding, coe_embedding, add_tsub_cancel_left]
/-- Equivalence between the disjoint union of the blocks (each of them seen as
`Fin (c.blocksFun i)`) with `Fin n`. -/
def blocksFinEquiv : (Σi : Fin c.length, Fin (c.blocksFun i)) ≃ Fin n where
toFun x := c.embedding x.1 x.2
invFun j := ⟨c.index j, c.invEmbedding j⟩
left_inv x := by
rcases x with ⟨i, y⟩
dsimp
congr; · exact c.index_embedding _ _
rw [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
· exact c.invEmbedding_comp _ _
· rw [c.index_embedding]
right_inv j := c.embedding_comp_inv j
theorem blocksFun_congr {n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (c₁ : Composition n₁) (c₂ : Composition n₂) (i₁ : Fin c₁.length)
(i₂ : Fin c₂.length) (hn : n₁ = n₂) (hc : c₁.blocks = c₂.blocks) (hi : (i₁ : ℕ) = i₂) :
c₁.blocksFun i₁ = c₂.blocksFun i₂ := by
cases hn
rw [← Composition.ext_iff] at hc
cases hc
congr
rwa [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- Two compositions (possibly of different integers) coincide if and only if they have the
same sequence of blocks. -/
theorem sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq {c : Σ n, Composition n} {c' : Σ n, Composition n} :
c = c' ↔ c.2.blocks = c'.2.blocks := by
refine ⟨fun H => by rw [H], fun H => ?_⟩
rcases c with ⟨n, c⟩
rcases c' with ⟨n', c'⟩
have : n = n' := by rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← c'.blocks_sum, H]
induction this
congr
ext1
exact H
/-! ### The composition `Composition.ones` -/
/-- The composition made of blocks all of size `1`. -/
def ones (n : ℕ) : Composition n :=
⟨replicate n (1 : ℕ), fun {i} hi => by simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hi], by simp⟩
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (Composition n) :=
⟨Composition.ones n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ones_length (n : ℕ) : (ones n).length = n :=
List.length_replicate
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocks (n : ℕ) : (ones n).blocks = replicate n (1 : ℕ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ones_blocksFun (n : ℕ) (i : Fin (ones n).length) : (ones n).blocksFun i = 1 := by
simp only [blocksFun, ones, get_eq_getElem, getElem_replicate]
@[simp]
theorem ones_sizeUpTo (n : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : (ones n).sizeUpTo i = min i n := by
simp [sizeUpTo, ones_blocks, take_replicate]
@[simp]
theorem ones_embedding (i : Fin (ones n).length) (h : 0 < (ones n).blocksFun i) :
(ones n).embedding i ⟨0, h⟩ = ⟨i, lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (ones n).length_le⟩ := by
ext
simpa using i.2.le
theorem eq_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ ∀ i ∈ c.blocks, i = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact fun i => eq_of_mem_replicate
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks = replicate c.blocks.length 1 := eq_replicate_of_mem H
have : c.blocks.length = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, A]
simp
rw [A, this, ones_blocks]
theorem ne_ones_iff {c : Composition n} : c ≠ ones n ↔ ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := by
refine (not_congr eq_ones_iff).trans ?_
have : ∀ j ∈ c.blocks, j = 1 ↔ j ≤ 1 := fun j hj => by simp [le_antisymm_iff, c.one_le_blocks hj]
simp +contextual [this]
theorem eq_ones_iff_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ c.length = n := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ones_length n
· contrapose
intro H length_n
apply lt_irrefl n
calc
n = ∑ i : Fin c.length, 1 := by simp [length_n]
_ < ∑ i : Fin c.length, c.blocksFun i := by
{
obtain ⟨i, hi, i_blocks⟩ : ∃ i ∈ c.blocks, 1 < i := ne_ones_iff.1 H
rw [← ofFn_blocksFun, mem_ofFn' c.blocksFun, Set.mem_range] at hi
obtain ⟨j : Fin c.length, hj : c.blocksFun j = i⟩ := hi
rw [← hj] at i_blocks
exact Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => one_le_blocksFun c i) ⟨j, Finset.mem_univ _, i_blocks⟩
}
_ = n := c.sum_blocksFun
theorem eq_ones_iff_le_length {c : Composition n} : c = ones n ↔ n ≤ c.length := by
simp [eq_ones_iff_length, le_antisymm_iff, c.length_le]
/-! ### The composition `Composition.single` -/
/-- The composition made of a single block of size `n`. -/
def single (n : ℕ) (h : 0 < n) : Composition n :=
⟨[n], by simp [h], by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem single_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).length = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem single_blocks {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : (single n h).blocks = [n] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem single_blocksFun {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin (single n h).length) :
(single n h).blocksFun i = n := by simp [blocksFun, single, blocks, i.2]
@[simp]
theorem single_embedding {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (i : Fin n) :
((single n h).embedding (0 : Fin 1)) i = i := by
ext
simp
theorem eq_single_iff_length {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c = single n h ↔ c.length = 1 := by
constructor
· intro H
rw [H]
exact single_length h
· intro H
ext1
have A : c.blocks.length = 1 := H ▸ c.blocks_length
have B : c.blocks.sum = n := c.blocks_sum
rw [eq_cons_of_length_one A] at B ⊢
simpa [single_blocks] using B
theorem ne_single_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {c : Composition n} :
c ≠ single n hn ↔ ∀ i, c.blocksFun i < n := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨⟨0, by simp⟩, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [eq_single_iff_length]
have : ∀ j : Fin c.length, j = i := by
intro j
by_contra ji
apply lt_irrefl (∑ k, c.blocksFun k)
calc
∑ k, c.blocksFun k ≤ c.blocksFun i := by simp only [c.sum_blocksFun, hi]
_ < ∑ k, c.blocksFun k :=
Finset.single_lt_sum ji (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) (c.one_le_blocksFun j)
fun _ _ _ => zero_le _
simpa using Fintype.card_eq_one_of_forall_eq this
variable {m : ℕ}
/-- Change `n` in `(c : Composition n)` to a propositionally equal value. -/
@[simps]
protected def cast (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) : Composition n where
__ := c
blocks_sum := c.blocks_sum.trans hmn
@[simp]
theorem cast_rfl (c : Composition n) : c.cast rfl = c := rfl
theorem cast_heq (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) : HEq (c.cast hmn) c := by subst m; rfl
theorem cast_eq_cast (c : Composition m) (hmn : m = n) :
c.cast hmn = cast (hmn ▸ rfl) c := by
subst m
rfl
/-- Append two compositions to get a composition of the sum of numbers. -/
@[simps]
def append (c₁ : Composition m) (c₂ : Composition n) : Composition (m + n) where
blocks := c₁.blocks ++ c₂.blocks
blocks_pos := by
intro i hi
rw [mem_append] at hi
exact hi.elim c₁.blocks_pos c₂.blocks_pos
blocks_sum := by simp
/-- Reverse the order of blocks in a composition. -/
@[simps]
def reverse (c : Composition n) : Composition n where
blocks := c.blocks.reverse
blocks_pos hi := c.blocks_pos (mem_reverse.mp hi)
blocks_sum := by simp [List.sum_reverse]
@[simp]
lemma reverse_reverse (c : Composition n) : c.reverse.reverse = c :=
Composition.ext <| List.reverse_reverse _
lemma reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (@reverse n) := reverse_reverse
lemma reverse_bijective : Function.Bijective (@reverse n) := reverse_involutive.bijective
lemma reverse_injective : Function.Injective (@reverse n) := reverse_involutive.injective
lemma reverse_surjective : Function.Surjective (@reverse n) := reverse_involutive.surjective
@[simp]
lemma reverse_inj {c₁ c₂ : Composition n} : c₁.reverse = c₂.reverse ↔ c₁ = c₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
lemma reverse_ones : (ones n).reverse = ones n := by ext1; simp
@[simp]
lemma reverse_single (hn : 0 < n) : (single n hn).reverse = single n hn := by ext1; simp
@[simp]
lemma reverse_eq_ones {c : Composition n} : c.reverse = ones n ↔ c = ones n :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff' reverse_ones
@[simp]
lemma reverse_eq_single {hn : 0 < n} {c : Composition n} :
c.reverse = single n hn ↔ c = single n hn :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff' <| reverse_single _
lemma reverse_append (c₁ : Composition m) (c₂ : Composition n) :
reverse (append c₁ c₂) = (append c₂.reverse c₁.reverse).cast (add_comm _ _) :=
Composition.ext <| by simp
/-- Induction (recursion) principle on `c : Composition _`
that corresponds to the usual induction on the list of blocks of `c`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnSingleAppend {motive : ∀ n, Composition n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
(zero : motive 0 (ones 0))
(single_append : ∀ k n c, motive n c →
motive (k + 1 + n) (append (single (k + 1) k.succ_pos) c)) :
motive n c :=
match n, c with
| _, ⟨blocks, blocks_pos, rfl⟩ =>
match blocks with
| [] => zero
| 0 :: _ => by simp at blocks_pos
| (k + 1) :: l =>
single_append k l.sum ⟨l, fun hi ↦ blocks_pos <| mem_cons_of_mem _ hi, rfl⟩ <|
recOnSingleAppend _ zero single_append
decreasing_by simp
/-- Induction (recursion) principle on `c : Composition _`
that corresponds to the reverse induction on the list of blocks of `c`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnAppendSingle {motive : ∀ n, Composition n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
(zero : motive 0 (ones 0))
(append_single : ∀ k n c, motive n c →
motive (n + (k + 1)) (append c (single (k + 1) k.succ_pos))) :
motive n c :=
reverse_reverse c ▸ c.reverse.recOnSingleAppend zero fun k n c ih ↦ by
convert append_single k n c.reverse ih using 1
· apply add_comm
· rw [reverse_append, reverse_single]
apply cast_heq
end Composition
/-!
### Splitting a list
Given a list of length `n` and a composition `c` of `n`, one can split `l` into `c.length` sublists
of respective lengths `c.blocksFun 0`, ..., `c.blocksFun (c.length-1)`. This is inverse to the
join operation.
-/
namespace List
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Auxiliary for `List.splitWrtComposition`. -/
def splitWrtCompositionAux : List α → List ℕ → List (List α)
| _, [] => []
| l, n::ns =>
let (l₁, l₂) := l.splitAt n
l₁::splitWrtCompositionAux l₂ ns
/-- Given a list of length `n` and a composition `[i₁, ..., iₖ]` of `n`, split `l` into a list of
`k` lists corresponding to the blocks of the composition, of respective lengths `i₁`, ..., `iₖ`.
This makes sense mostly when `n = l.length`, but this is not necessary for the definition. -/
def splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n) : List (List α) :=
splitWrtCompositionAux l c.blocks
@[local simp]
theorem splitWrtCompositionAux_cons (l : List α) (n ns) :
l.splitWrtCompositionAux (n::ns) = take n l::(drop n l).splitWrtCompositionAux ns := by
simp [splitWrtCompositionAux]
theorem length_splitWrtCompositionAux (l : List α) (ns) :
length (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns) = ns.length := by
induction ns generalizing l
· simp [splitWrtCompositionAux, *]
· simp [*]
/-- When one splits a list along a composition `c`, the number of sublists thus created is
`c.length`. -/
@[simp]
theorem length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n) :
length (l.splitWrtComposition c) = c.length :=
length_splitWrtCompositionAux _ _
theorem map_length_splitWrtCompositionAux {ns : List ℕ} :
∀ {l : List α}, ns.sum ≤ l.length → map length (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns) = ns := by
induction ns with
| nil => simp [splitWrtCompositionAux]
| cons n ns IH =>
intro l h; simp only [sum_cons] at h
have := le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) h
simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux_cons, this]; dsimp
rw [length_take, IH] <;> simp [length_drop]
· assumption
· exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left h
/-- When one splits a list along a composition `c`, the lengths of the sublists thus created are
given by the block sizes in `c`. -/
theorem map_length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) :
map length (l.splitWrtComposition c) = c.blocks :=
map_length_splitWrtCompositionAux (le_of_eq c.blocks_sum)
theorem length_pos_of_mem_splitWrtComposition {l l' : List α} {c : Composition l.length}
(h : l' ∈ l.splitWrtComposition c) : 0 < length l' := by
have : l'.length ∈ (l.splitWrtComposition c).map List.length :=
List.mem_map_of_mem h
rw [map_length_splitWrtComposition] at this
exact c.blocks_pos this
theorem sum_take_map_length_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) (i : ℕ) :
(((l.splitWrtComposition c).map length).take i).sum = c.sizeUpTo i := by
congr
exact map_length_splitWrtComposition l c
theorem getElem_splitWrtCompositionAux (l : List α) (ns : List ℕ) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i < (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns).length) :
(l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns)[i] =
(l.take (ns.take (i + 1)).sum).drop (ns.take i).sum := by
induction ns generalizing l i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons n ns IH =>
rcases i with - | i
· rw [Nat.add_zero, List.take_zero, sum_nil]
simp
· simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux, getElem_cons_succ, IH, take,
sum_cons, Nat.add_eq, add_zero, splitAt_eq, drop_take, drop_drop]
rw [Nat.add_sub_add_left]
/-- The `i`-th sublist in the splitting of a list `l` along a composition `c`, is the slice of `l`
between the indices `c.sizeUpTo i` and `c.sizeUpTo (i+1)`, i.e., the indices in the `i`-th
block of the composition. -/
theorem getElem_splitWrtComposition' (l : List α) (c : Composition n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i < (l.splitWrtComposition c).length) :
(l.splitWrtComposition c)[i] = (l.take (c.sizeUpTo (i + 1))).drop (c.sizeUpTo i) :=
getElem_splitWrtCompositionAux _ _ hi
theorem getElem_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition n)
(i : Nat) (h : i < (l.splitWrtComposition c).length) :
(l.splitWrtComposition c)[i] = (l.take (c.sizeUpTo (i + 1))).drop (c.sizeUpTo i) :=
getElem_splitWrtComposition' _ _ h
theorem flatten_splitWrtCompositionAux {ns : List ℕ} :
∀ {l : List α}, ns.sum = l.length → (l.splitWrtCompositionAux ns).flatten = l := by
induction ns with
| nil => exact fun h ↦ (length_eq_zero_iff.1 h.symm).symm
| cons n ns IH =>
intro l h; rw [sum_cons] at h
simp only [splitWrtCompositionAux_cons]; dsimp
rw [IH]
· simp
· rw [length_drop, ← h, add_tsub_cancel_left]
/-- If one splits a list along a composition, and then flattens the sublists, one gets back the
original list. -/
@[simp]
theorem flatten_splitWrtComposition (l : List α) (c : Composition l.length) :
(l.splitWrtComposition c).flatten = l :=
flatten_splitWrtCompositionAux c.blocks_sum
/-- If one joins a list of lists and then splits the flattening along the right composition,
one gets back the original list of lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem splitWrtComposition_flatten (L : List (List α)) (c : Composition L.flatten.length)
(h : map length L = c.blocks) : splitWrtComposition (flatten L) c = L := by
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, eq_iff_flatten_eq, flatten_splitWrtComposition,
map_length_splitWrtComposition, h]
end List
/-!
### Compositions as sets
Combinatorial viewpoints on compositions, seen as finite subsets of `Fin (n+1)` containing `0` and
`n`, where the points of the set (other than `n`) correspond to the leftmost points of each block.
-/
/-- Bijection between compositions of `n` and subsets of `{0, ..., n-2}`, defined by
considering the restriction of the subset to `{1, ..., n-1}` and shifting to the left by one. -/
def compositionAsSetEquiv (n : ℕ) : CompositionAsSet n ≃ Finset (Fin (n - 1)) where
toFun c :=
{ i : Fin (n - 1) |
(⟨1 + (i : ℕ), by
apply (add_lt_add_left i.is_lt 1).trans_le
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm]
exact add_le_add (Nat.sub_le n 1) (le_refl 1)⟩ :
Fin n.succ) ∈
c.boundaries }.toFinset
invFun s :=
{ boundaries :=
{ i : Fin n.succ |
i = 0 ∨ i = Fin.last n ∨ ∃ (j : Fin (n - 1)) (_hj : j ∈ s), (i : ℕ) = j + 1 }.toFinset
zero_mem := by simp
getLast_mem := by simp }
left_inv := by
intro c
ext i
simp only [add_comm, Set.toFinset_setOf, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, true_and, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨j, hj1, hj2⟩)
· exact c.zero_mem
· exact c.getLast_mem
· convert hj1
· simp only [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← ne_eq, ← Fin.exists_succ_eq]
rintro i_mem ⟨j, rfl⟩ i_ne_last
rcases Nat.exists_add_one_eq.mpr j.pos with ⟨n, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : ∃ k : Fin n, k.castSucc = j := by
simpa [Fin.exists_castSucc_eq] using i_ne_last
use k
simpa using i_mem
right_inv := by
intro s
ext i
have : (i : ℕ) + 1 ≠ n := by
apply ne_of_lt
convert add_lt_add_right i.is_lt 1
apply (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos _).symm
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_pred (Fin.pos i)
simp only [add_comm, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_last, exists_prop, Set.toFinset_setOf,
Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, add_eq_zero, and_false,
add_left_inj, false_or, true_and, reduceCtorEq]
simp_rw [this, false_or, ← Fin.ext_iff, exists_eq_right']
instance compositionAsSetFintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (CompositionAsSet n) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (compositionAsSetEquiv n).symm
theorem compositionAsSet_card (n : ℕ) : Fintype.card (CompositionAsSet n) = 2 ^ (n - 1) := by
have : Fintype.card (Finset (Fin (n - 1))) = 2 ^ (n - 1) := by simp
rw [← this]
exact Fintype.card_congr (compositionAsSetEquiv n)
namespace CompositionAsSet
variable (c : CompositionAsSet n)
theorem boundaries_nonempty : c.boundaries.Nonempty :=
⟨0, c.zero_mem⟩
theorem card_boundaries_pos : 0 < Finset.card c.boundaries :=
Finset.card_pos.mpr c.boundaries_nonempty
/-- Number of blocks in a `CompositionAsSet`. -/
def length : ℕ :=
Finset.card c.boundaries - 1
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 :=
(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt c.card_boundaries_pos)).mp rfl
theorem length_lt_card_boundaries : c.length < c.boundaries.card := by
rw [c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length]
exact Nat.lt_add_one _
theorem lt_length (i : Fin c.length) : (i : ℕ) + 1 < c.boundaries.card :=
lt_tsub_iff_right.mp i.2
theorem lt_length' (i : Fin c.length) : (i : ℕ) < c.boundaries.card :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_succ i) (c.lt_length i)
/-- Canonical increasing bijection from `Fin c.boundaries.card` to `c.boundaries`. -/
def boundary : Fin c.boundaries.card ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin rfl
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : (c.boundary ⟨0, c.card_boundaries_pos⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [boundary, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_zero rfl c.card_boundaries_pos]
exact le_antisymm (Finset.min'_le _ _ c.zero_mem) (Fin.zero_le _)
@[simp]
theorem boundary_length : c.boundary ⟨c.length, c.length_lt_card_boundaries⟩ = Fin.last n := by
convert Finset.orderEmbOfFin_last rfl c.card_boundaries_pos
exact le_antisymm (Finset.le_max' _ _ c.getLast_mem) (Fin.le_last _)
/-- Size of the `i`-th block in a `CompositionAsSet`, seen as a function on `Fin c.length`. -/
def blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : ℕ :=
c.boundary ⟨(i : ℕ) + 1, c.lt_length i⟩ - c.boundary ⟨i, c.lt_length' i⟩
theorem blocksFun_pos (i : Fin c.length) : 0 < c.blocksFun i :=
haveI : (⟨i, c.lt_length' i⟩ : Fin c.boundaries.card) < ⟨i + 1, c.lt_length i⟩ :=
Nat.lt_succ_self _
lt_tsub_iff_left.mpr ((c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin rfl).strictMono this)
/-- List of the sizes of the blocks in a `CompositionAsSet`. -/
def blocks (c : CompositionAsSet n) : List ℕ :=
ofFn c.blocksFun
@[simp]
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
length_ofFn
theorem blocks_partial_sum {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.boundaries.card) :
(c.blocks.take i).sum = c.boundary ⟨i, h⟩ := by
induction i with
| zero => simp
| succ i IH =>
have A : i < c.blocks.length := by
rw [c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length] at h
simp [blocks, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h]
have B : i < c.boundaries.card := lt_of_lt_of_le A (by simp [blocks, length, Nat.sub_le])
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ A, IH B]
simp [blocks, blocksFun, get_ofFn]
theorem mem_boundaries_iff_exists_blocks_sum_take_eq {j : Fin (n + 1)} :
j ∈ c.boundaries ↔ ∃ i < c.boundaries.card, (c.blocks.take i).sum = j := by
constructor
· intro hj
| rcases (c.boundaries.orderIsoOfFin rfl).surjective ⟨j, hj⟩ with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk] at hi
refine ⟨i.1, i.2, ?_⟩
dsimp at hi
rw [← hi, c.blocks_partial_sum i.2]
rfl
· rintro ⟨i, hi, H⟩
convert (c.boundaries.orderIsoOfFin rfl ⟨i, hi⟩).2
have : c.boundary ⟨i, hi⟩ = j := by rwa [Fin.ext_iff, ← c.blocks_partial_sum hi]
exact this.symm
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 944 | 953 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homotopy
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Notations
/-!
# Construction of homotopies for the Dold-Kan correspondence
(The general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan correspondence is explained
in `Equivalence.lean`.)
The purpose of the files `Homotopies.lean`, `Faces.lean`, `Projections.lean`
and `PInfty.lean` is to construct an idempotent endomorphism
`PInfty : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` of the alternating face map complex
for each `X : SimplicialObject C` when `C` is a preadditive category.
In the case `C` is abelian, this `PInfty` shall be the projection on the
normalized Moore subcomplex of `K[X]` associated to the decomposition of the
complex `K[X]` as a direct sum of this normalized subcomplex and of the
degenerate subcomplex.
In `PInfty.lean`, this endomorphism `PInfty` shall be obtained by
passing to the limit idempotent endomorphisms `P q` for all `(q : ℕ)`.
These endomorphisms `P q` are defined by induction. The idea is to
start from the identity endomorphism `P 0` of `K[X]` and to ensure by
induction that the `q` higher face maps (except $d_0$) vanish on the
image of `P q`. Then, in a certain degree `n`, the image of `P q` for
a big enough `q` will be contained in the normalized subcomplex. This
construction is done in `Projections.lean`.
It would be easy to define the `P q` degreewise (similarly as it is done
in *Simplicial Homotopy Theory* by Goerrs-Jardine p. 149), but then we would
have to prove that they are compatible with the differential (i.e. they
are chain complex maps), and also that they are homotopic to the identity.
These two verifications are quite technical. In order to reduce the number
of such technical lemmas, the strategy that is followed here is to define
a series of null homotopic maps `Hσ q` (attached to families of maps `hσ`)
and use these in order to construct `P q` : the endomorphisms `P q`
shall basically be obtained by altering the identity endomorphism by adding
null homotopic maps, so that we get for free that they are morphisms
of chain complexes and that they are homotopic to the identity. The most
technical verifications that are needed about the null homotopic maps `Hσ`
are obtained in `Faces.lean`.
In this file `Homotopies.lean`, we define the null homotopic maps
`Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]`, show that they are natural (see `natTransHσ`) and
compatible the application of additive functors (see `map_Hσ`).
## References
* [Albrecht Dold, *Homology of Symmetric Products and Other Functors of Complexes*][dold1958]
* [Paul G. Goerss, John F. Jardine, *Simplicial Homotopy Theory*][goerss-jardine-2009]
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject Homotopy Opposite Simplicial DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable {X : SimplicialObject C}
/-- As we are using chain complexes indexed by `ℕ`, we shall need the relation
`c` such `c m n` if and only if `n+1=m`. -/
abbrev c :=
ComplexShape.down ℕ
/-- Helper when we need some `c.rel i j` (i.e. `ComplexShape.down ℕ`),
e.g. `c_mk n (n+1) rfl` -/
theorem c_mk (i j : ℕ) (h : j + 1 = i) : c.Rel i j :=
ComplexShape.down_mk i j h
/-- This lemma is meant to be used with `nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left` -/
theorem cs_down_0_not_rel_left (j : ℕ) : ¬c.Rel 0 j := by
intro hj
dsimp at hj
apply Nat.not_succ_le_zero j
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, hj]
/-- The sequence of maps which gives the null homotopic maps `Hσ` that shall be in
the inductive construction of the projections `P q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]` -/
def hσ (q : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌ :=
if n < q then 0 else (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n - q) • X.σ ⟨n - q, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le _ _)⟩
/-- We can turn `hσ` into a datum that can be passed to `nullHomotopicMap'`. -/
def hσ' (q : ℕ) : ∀ n m, c.Rel m n → (K[X].X n ⟶ K[X].X m) := fun n m hnm =>
hσ q n ≫ eqToHom (by congr)
theorem hσ'_eq_zero {q n m : ℕ} (hnq : n < q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) = 0 := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
exact zero_comp
theorem hσ'_eq {q n a m : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋m⦌) =
((-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩) ≫
eqToHom (by congr) := by
simp only [hσ', hσ]
split_ifs
· omega
· have h' := tsub_eq_of_eq_add ha
congr
theorem hσ'_eq' {q n a : ℕ} (ha : n = a + q) :
(hσ' q n (n + 1) rfl : X _⦋n⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌) =
(-1 : ℤ) ^ a • X.σ ⟨a, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr (Nat.le.intro (Eq.symm ha))⟩ := by
rw [hσ'_eq ha rfl, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
/-- The null homotopic map $(hσ q) ∘ d + d ∘ (hσ q)$ -/
def Hσ (q : ℕ) : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
nullHomotopicMap' (hσ' q)
/-- `Hσ` is null homotopic -/
def homotopyHσToZero (q : ℕ) : Homotopy (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]) 0 :=
nullHomotopy' (hσ' q)
/-- In degree `0`, the null homotopic map `Hσ` is zero. -/
theorem Hσ_eq_zero (q : ℕ) : (Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ K[X]).f 0 = 0 := by
unfold Hσ
rw [nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left (c_mk 1 0 rfl) cs_down_0_not_rel_left]
rcases q with (_|q)
· rw [hσ'_eq (show 0 = 0 + 0 by rfl) (c_mk 1 0 rfl)]
simp only [pow_zero, Fin.mk_zero, one_zsmul, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
-- This `erw` is needed to show `0 + 1 = 1`.
erw [ChainComplex.of_d]
rw [AlternatingFaceMapComplex.objD, Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one, pow_zero,
pow_one, one_smul, neg_smul, one_smul, comp_add, comp_neg, add_neg_eq_zero,
← Fin.castSucc_zero, ← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, δ_comp_σ_self, δ_comp_σ_succ]
· rw [hσ'_eq_zero (Nat.succ_pos q) (c_mk 1 0 rfl), zero_comp]
/-- The maps `hσ' q n m hnm` are natural on the simplicial object -/
theorem hσ'_naturality (q : ℕ) (n m : ℕ) (hnm : c.Rel m n) {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f.app (op ⦋n⦌) ≫ hσ' q n m hnm = hσ' q n m hnm ≫ f.app (op ⦋m⦌) := by
have h : n + 1 = m := hnm
subst h
simp only [hσ', eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
unfold hσ
split_ifs
· rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]
· simp
/-- For each q, `Hσ q` is a natural transformation. -/
def natTransHσ (q : ℕ) : alternatingFaceMapComplex C ⟶ alternatingFaceMapComplex C where
app _ := Hσ q
naturality _ _ f := by
unfold Hσ
rw [nullHomotopicMap'_comp, comp_nullHomotopicMap']
congr
ext n m hnm
simp only [alternatingFaceMapComplex_map_f, hσ'_naturality]
/-- The maps `hσ' q n m hnm` are compatible with the application of additive functors. -/
theorem map_hσ' {D : Type*} [Category D] [Preadditive D] (G : C ⥤ D) [G.Additive]
(X : SimplicialObject C) (q n m : ℕ) (hnm : c.Rel m n) :
(hσ' q n m hnm : K[((whiskering _ _).obj G).obj X].X n ⟶ _) =
G.map (hσ' q n m hnm : K[X].X n ⟶ _) := by
unfold hσ' hσ
split_ifs
· simp only [Functor.map_zero, zero_comp]
· simp only [eqToHom_map, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_zsmul]
rfl
/-- The null homotopic maps `Hσ` are compatible with the application of additive functors. -/
theorem map_Hσ {D : Type*} [Category D] [Preadditive D] (G : C ⥤ D) [G.Additive]
(X : SimplicialObject C) (q n : ℕ) :
(Hσ q : K[((whiskering C D).obj G).obj X] ⟶ _).f n = G.map ((Hσ q : K[X] ⟶ _).f n) := by
unfold Hσ
have eq := HomologicalComplex.congr_hom (map_nullHomotopicMap' G (@hσ' _ _ _ X q)) n
simp only [Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_map_f, ← map_hσ'] at eq
rw [eq]
let h := (Functor.congr_obj (map_alternatingFaceMapComplex G) X).symm
congr
end DoldKan
end AlgebraicTopology
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Homotopies.lean | 194 | 202 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
· exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
· simp only [← ih]
exact coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux _ _ L M k
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
theorem lcs_le_self : N.lcs k ≤ N := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih).trans (N.lie_le_right ⊤)
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap : lowerCentralSeries R L N k = (N.lcs k).comap N.incl := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lcs_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ] at ih ⊢
have : N.lcs k ≤ N.incl.range := by
rw [N.range_incl]
apply lcs_le_self
rw [ih, LieSubmodule.comap_bracket_eq _ N.incl _ N.ker_incl this]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs : (lowerCentralSeries R L N k).map N.incl = N.lcs k := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.map_comap_incl, inf_eq_right]
apply lcs_le_self
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot:
lowerCentralSeries R L N k = ⊥ ↔ lcs k N = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← N.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs, ← LieModuleHom.le_ker_iff_map]
simpa
· rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, comap_incl_eq_bot]
simp [h]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable {M₂ : Type w₁} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (R L M)
theorem antitone_lowerCentralSeries : Antitone <| lowerCentralSeries R L M := by
intro l k
induction k generalizing l with
| zero => exact fun h ↦ (Nat.le_zero.mp h).symm ▸ le_rfl
| succ k ih =>
intro h
rcases Nat.of_le_succ h with (hk | hk)
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact (LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (ih hk)).trans (LieSubmodule.lie_le_right _ _)
· exact hk.symm ▸ le_rfl
theorem eventually_iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq [IsArtinian R M] :
∀ᶠ l in Filter.atTop, ⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = lowerCentralSeries R L M l := by
have h_wf : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M)ᵒᵈ :=
LieSubmodule.wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → lowerCentralSeries R L M n = lowerCentralSeries R L M m⟩ :=
h_wf.monotone_chain_condition ⟨_, antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M⟩
refine Filter.eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun l hl ↦ le_antisymm (iInf_le _ _) (le_iInf fun m ↦ ?_)⟩
rcases le_or_lt l m with h | h
· rw [← hn _ hl, ← hn _ (hl.trans h)]
· exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (le_of_lt h)
theorem trivial_iff_lower_central_eq_bot : IsTrivial L M ↔ lowerCentralSeries R L M 1 = ⊥ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp
· rw [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] at h; apply IsTrivial.mk; intro x m; apply h
apply LieSubmodule.subset_lieSpan
simp only [LieSubmodule.top_coe, Subtype.exists, LieSubmodule.mem_top, exists_prop, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf]
exact ⟨x, m, rfl⟩
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries (x : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x)^[k] m ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L M k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Function.iterate_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, LieSubmodule.mem_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ',
toEnd_apply_apply]
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ih
theorem iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ (x y : L) (m : M) (k : ℕ) :
(toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y)^[k] m ∈
lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
have hk : 2 * k.succ = (2 * k + 1) + 1 := rfl
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ', hk,
toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top x) ?_
exact LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie (LieSubmodule.mem_top y) ih
variable {R L M}
theorem map_lowerCentralSeries_le (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [lowerCentralSeries_zero, le_top]
| succ k ih =>
simp only [LieModule.lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ ih
lemma map_lowerCentralSeries_eq {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k).map f = lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ k := by
apply le_antisymm (map_lowerCentralSeries_le k f)
induction k with
| zero =>
rwa [lowerCentralSeries_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero, top_le_iff, f.map_top,
f.range_eq_top]
| succ =>
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq]
apply LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
assumption
end
open LieAlgebra
theorem derivedSeries_le_lowerCentralSeries (k : ℕ) :
derivedSeries R L k ≤ lowerCentralSeries R L L k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_zero, lowerCentralSeries_zero]
| succ k h =>
have h' : derivedSeries R L k ≤ ⊤ := by simp only [le_top]
rw [derivedSeries_def, derivedSeriesOfIdeal_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
exact LieSubmodule.mono_lie h' h
/-- A Lie module is nilpotent if its lower central series reaches 0 (in a finite number of
steps). -/
@[mk_iff isNilpotent_iff_int]
class IsNilpotent : Prop where
mk_int ::
nilpotent_int : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥
section
variable [LieModule R L M]
/-- See also `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_ucs_eq_top`. -/
lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent L M ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
simp [isNilpotent_iff_int, SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int R L M]
lemma IsNilpotent.nilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] : ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mp ‹_›
variable {R L} in
lemma IsNilpotent.mk {k : ℕ} (h : lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥) : IsNilpotent L M :=
(isNilpotent_iff R L M).mpr ⟨k, h⟩
@[deprecated IsNilpotent.nilpotent (since := "2025-01-07")]
theorem exists_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ :=
IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
@[simp] lemma iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k = ⊥ := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact iInf_le _ _
end
section
variable {R L M}
variable [LieModule R L M]
theorem _root_.LieSubmodule.isNilpotent_iff_exists_lcs_eq_bot (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
LieModule.IsNilpotent L N ↔ ∃ k, N.lcs k = ⊥ := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L N]
refine exists_congr fun k => ?_
rw [N.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap k, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot,
inf_eq_right.mpr (N.lcs_le_self k)]
variable (R L M)
instance (priority := 100) trivialIsNilpotent [IsTrivial L M] : IsNilpotent L M :=
⟨by use 1; simp⟩
instance instIsNilpotentSup (M₁ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) [IsNilpotent L M₁] [IsNilpotent L M₂] :
IsNilpotent L (M₁ ⊔ M₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₁
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M₂
let lcs_eq_bot {m n} (N : LieSubmodule R L M) (le : m ≤ n) (hn : lowerCentralSeries R L N m = ⊥) :
lowerCentralSeries R L N n = ⊥ := by
simpa [hn] using antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L N le
have h₁ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₁ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₁ (Nat.le_max_left k l) hk
have h₂ : lowerCentralSeries R L M₂ (k ⊔ l) = ⊥ := lcs_eq_bot M₂ (Nat.le_max_right k l) hl
refine (isNilpotent_iff R L (M₁ + M₂)).mpr ⟨k ⊔ l, ?_⟩
simp [LieSubmodule.add_eq_sup, (M₁ ⊔ M₂).lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap, LieSubmodule.lcs_sup,
(M₁.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₁,
(M₂.lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_lcs_eq_bot (k ⊔ l)).1 h₂, LieSubmodule.comap_incl_eq_bot]
theorem exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero [IsNilpotent L M] :
∃ k : ℕ, ∀ x : L, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
use k
intro x; ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @LieSubmodule.mem_bot R L M, ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries R L M x m k
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x) := by
change ∃ k, toEnd R L M x ^ k = 0
have := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
tauto
theorem isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ [IsNilpotent L M] (x y : L) :
_root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x ∘ₗ toEnd R L M y) := by
obtain ⟨k, hM⟩ := IsNilpotent.nilpotent R L M
replace hM : lowerCentralSeries R L M (2 * k) = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hM]; exact antitone_lowerCentralSeries R L M (by omega)
use k
ext m
rw [Module.End.pow_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← LieSubmodule.mem_bot (R := R) (L := L), ← hM]
exact iterate_toEnd_mem_lowerCentralSeries₂ R L M x y m k
@[simp] lemma maxGenEigenSpace_toEnd_eq_top [IsNilpotent L M] (x : L) :
((toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace 0) = ⊤ := by
ext m
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace, zero_smul, sub_zero, Submodule.mem_top,
iff_true]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_forall_pow_toEnd_eq_zero R L M
exact ⟨k, by simp [hk x]⟩
/-- If the quotient of a Lie module `M` by a Lie submodule on which the Lie algebra acts trivially
is nilpotent then `M` is nilpotent.
This is essentially the Lie module equivalent of the fact that a central
extension of nilpotent Lie algebras is nilpotent. See `LieAlgebra.nilpotent_of_nilpotent_quotient`
below for the corresponding result for Lie algebras. -/
theorem nilpotentOfNilpotentQuotient {N : LieSubmodule R L M} (h₁ : N ≤ maxTrivSubmodule R L M)
(h₂ : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) : IsNilpotent L M := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L] at h₂ ⊢
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h₂
use k + 1
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ]
suffices lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N by
replace this := LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right ⊤ (le_trans this h₁)
rwa [ideal_oper_maxTrivSubmodule_eq_bot, le_bot_iff] at this
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, ← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact map_lowerCentralSeries_le k (LieSubmodule.Quotient.mk' N)
theorem isNilpotent_quotient_iff :
IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N) ↔ ∃ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
rw [isNilpotent_iff R L]
refine exists_congr fun k ↦ ?_
rw [← LieSubmodule.Quotient.map_mk'_eq_bot_le, map_lowerCentralSeries_eq k
(LieSubmodule.Quotient.surjective_mk' N)]
theorem iInf_lcs_le_of_isNilpotent_quot (h : IsNilpotent L (M ⧸ N)) :
⨅ k, lowerCentralSeries R L M k ≤ N := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (isNilpotent_quotient_iff R L M N).mp h
exact iInf_le_of_le k hk
| end
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie module `M` with lower central series `M = C₀ ≥ C₁ ≥ ⋯ ≥ Cₖ = ⊥`, this is
the natural number `k` (the number of inclusions).
For a non-nilpotent module, we use the junk value 0. -/
noncomputable def nilpotencyLength : ℕ :=
sInf {k | lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k = ⊥}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 385 | 392 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
| fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 193 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jon Eugster. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jon Eugster
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Equal and mixed characteristic
In commutative algebra, some statements are simpler when working over a `ℚ`-algebra `R`, in which
case one also says that the ring has "equal characteristic zero". A ring that is not a
`ℚ`-algebra has either positive characteristic or there exists a prime ideal `I ⊂ R` such that
the quotient `R ⧸ I` has positive characteristic `p > 0`. In this case one speaks of
"mixed characteristic `(0, p)`", where `p` is only unique if `R` is local.
Examples of mixed characteristic rings are `ℤ` or the `p`-adic integers/numbers.
This file provides the main theorem `split_by_characteristic` that splits any proposition `P` into
the following three cases:
1) Positive characteristic: `CharP R p` (where `p ≠ 0`)
2) Equal characteristic zero: `Algebra ℚ R`
3) Mixed characteristic: `MixedCharZero R p` (where `p` is prime)
## Main definitions
- `MixedCharZero` : A ring has mixed characteristic `(0, p)` if it has characteristic zero
and there exists an ideal such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
## Main results
- `split_equalCharZero_mixedCharZero` : Split a statement into equal/mixed characteristic zero.
This main theorem has the following three corollaries which include the positive
characteristic case for convenience:
- `split_by_characteristic` : Generally consider positive char `p ≠ 0`.
- `split_by_characteristic_domain` : In a domain we can assume that `p` is prime.
- `split_by_characteristic_localRing` : In a local ring we can assume that `p` is a prime power.
## Implementation Notes
We use the terms `EqualCharZero` and `AlgebraRat` despite not being such definitions in mathlib.
The former refers to the statement `∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)`, the latter
refers to the existence of an instance `[Algebra ℚ R]`. The two are shown to be
equivalent conditions.
## TODO
- Relate mixed characteristic in a local ring to p-adic numbers [NumberTheory.PAdics].
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-!
### Mixed characteristic
-/
/--
A ring of characteristic zero is of "mixed characteristic `(0, p)`" if there exists an ideal
such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
**Remark:** For `p = 0`, `MixedChar R 0` is a meaningless definition (i.e. satisfied by any ring)
as `R ⧸ ⊥ ≅ R` has by definition always characteristic zero.
One could require `(I ≠ ⊥)` in the definition, but then `MixedChar R 0` would mean something
like `ℤ`-algebra of extension degree `≥ 1` and would be completely independent from
whether something is a `ℚ`-algebra or not (e.g. `ℚ[X]` would satisfy it but `ℚ` wouldn't).
-/
class MixedCharZero (p : ℕ) : Prop where
[toCharZero : CharZero R]
charP_quotient : ∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p
namespace MixedCharZero
/--
Reduction to `p` prime: When proving any statement `P` about mixed characteristic rings we
can always assume that `p` is prime.
-/
theorem reduce_to_p_prime {P : Prop} :
(∀ p > 0, MixedCharZero R p → P) ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → MixedCharZero R p → P := by
constructor
· intro h q q_prime q_mixedChar
exact h q (Nat.Prime.pos q_prime) q_mixedChar
· intro h q q_pos q_mixedChar
rcases q_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, _⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `P` such that `I ≤ P`
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_ne_top with ⟨M, hM_max, h_IM⟩
let r := ringChar (R ⧸ M)
have r_pos : r ≠ 0 := by
have q_zero :=
congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor h_IM) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) q)
simp only [map_natCast, map_zero] at q_zero
apply ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero (ne_of_gt q_pos)
exact (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r q).mp q_zero
have r_prime : Nat.Prime r :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero (R ⧸ M) r) r_pos
apply h r r_prime
have : CharZero R := q_mixedChar.toCharZero
exact ⟨⟨M, hM_max.ne_top, ringChar.of_eq rfl⟩⟩
/--
Reduction to `I` prime ideal: When proving statements about mixed characteristic rings,
after we reduced to `p` prime, we can assume that the ideal `I` in the definition is maximal.
-/
theorem reduce_to_maximal_ideal {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) :
(∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p) ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsMaximal ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p := by
constructor
· intro g
rcases g with ⟨I, ⟨hI_not_top, _⟩⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `M` such that `I ≤ M`.
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_not_top with ⟨M, ⟨hM_max, hM_ge⟩⟩
use M
constructor
· exact hM_max
· cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ M) with
| intro r hr =>
convert hr
have r_dvd_p : r ∣ p := by
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r p]
convert congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor hM_ge) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) p)
symm
apply (Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd hp r r_dvd_p).resolve_left
exact CharP.char_ne_one (R ⧸ M) r
· intro ⟨I, hI_max, h_charP⟩
use I
exact ⟨Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top hI_max, h_charP⟩
end MixedCharZero
/-!
### Equal characteristic zero
A commutative ring `R` has "equal characteristic zero" if it satisfies one of the following
equivalent properties:
1) `R` is a `ℚ`-algebra.
2) The quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic zero for any proper ideal `I ⊂ R`.
3) `R` has characteristic zero and does not have mixed characteristic for any prime `p`.
We show `(1) ↔ (2) ↔ (3)`, and most of the following is concerned with constructing
an explicit algebra map `ℚ →+* R` (given by `x ↦ (x.num : R) /ₚ ↑x.pnatDen`)
for the direction `(1) ← (2)`.
Note: Property `(2)` is denoted as `EqualCharZero` in the statement names below.
-/
namespace EqualCharZero
/-- `ℚ`-algebra implies equal characteristic. -/
theorem of_algebraRat [Algebra ℚ R] : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI
constructor
intro a b h_ab
contrapose! hI
-- `↑a - ↑b` is a unit contained in `I`, which contradicts `I ≠ ⊤`.
refine I.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem ?_ (IsUnit.map (algebraMap ℚ R) (IsUnit.mk0 (a - b : ℚ) ?_))
· simpa only [← Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_natCast]
simpa only [Ne, sub_eq_zero] using (@Nat.cast_injective ℚ _ _).ne hI
section ConstructionAlgebraRat
variable {R}
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
theorem PNat.isUnit_natCast [h : Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))]
(n : ℕ+) : IsUnit (n : R) := by
-- `n : R` is a unit iff `(n)` is not a proper ideal in `R`.
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
-- So by contrapositive, we should show the quotient does not have characteristic zero.
apply not_imp_comm.mp (h.elim (Ideal.span {↑n}))
intro h_char_zero
-- In particular, the image of `n` in the quotient should be nonzero.
apply h_char_zero.cast_injective.ne n.ne_zero
-- But `n` generates the ideal, so its image is clearly zero.
rw [← map_natCast (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), Nat.cast_zero, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact Ideal.subset_span (Set.mem_singleton _)
@[coe]
noncomputable def pnatCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ℕ+ → Rˣ :=
fun n => (PNat.isUnit_natCast n).unit
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
noncomputable instance coePNatUnits
[Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : Coe ℕ+ Rˣ :=
⟨EqualCharZero.pnatCast⟩
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
theorem pnatCast_one [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ((1 : ℕ+) : Rˣ) = 1 := by
apply Units.ext
rw [Units.val_one]
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) 1).unit : R) = 1
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec (PNat.isUnit_natCast 1)]
rw [PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one]
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
theorem pnatCast_eq_natCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] (n : ℕ+) :
((n : Rˣ) : R) = ↑n := by
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) n).unit : R) = ↑n
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- Equal characteristic implies `ℚ`-algebra. -/
noncomputable def algebraRat (h : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) :
Algebra ℚ R :=
haveI : Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) := ⟨h⟩
RingHom.toAlgebra
{ toFun := fun x => x.num /ₚ ↑x.pnatDen
map_zero' := by simp [divp]
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by
intro a b
field_simp
trans (↑((a * b).num * a.den * b.den) : R)
· simp_rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
ring
rw [Rat.mul_num_den' a b]
simp
map_add' := by
intro a b
field_simp
trans (↑((a + b).num * a.den * b.den) : R)
· simp_rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
ring
rw [Rat.add_num_den' a b]
simp }
end ConstructionAlgebraRat
/-- Not mixed characteristic implies equal characteristic. -/
theorem of_not_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] (h : ∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p) :
∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI_ne_top
suffices CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 from CharP.charP_to_charZero _
cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ I) with
| intro p hp =>
cases p with
| zero => exact hp
| succ p =>
have h_mixed : MixedCharZero R p.succ := ⟨⟨I, ⟨hI_ne_top, hp⟩⟩⟩
exact absurd h_mixed (h p.succ p.succ_pos)
/-- Equal characteristic implies not mixed characteristic. -/
theorem to_not_mixedCharZero (h : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) :
∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p := by
intro p p_pos
by_contra hp_mixedChar
rcases hp_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, hI_p⟩
replace hI_zero : CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 := @CharP.ofCharZero _ _ (h I hI_ne_top)
exact absurd (CharP.eq (R ⧸ I) hI_p hI_zero) (ne_of_gt p_pos)
/--
A ring of characteristic zero has equal characteristic iff it does not
have mixed characteristic for any `p`.
-/
theorem iff_not_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] :
(∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) ↔ ∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p :=
⟨to_not_mixedCharZero R, of_not_mixedCharZero R⟩
/-- A ring is a `ℚ`-algebra iff it has equal characteristic zero. -/
theorem nonempty_algebraRat_iff :
Nonempty (Algebra ℚ R) ↔ ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
constructor
· intro h_alg
haveI h_alg' : Algebra ℚ R := h_alg.some
apply of_algebraRat
· intro h
apply Nonempty.intro
exact algebraRat h
end EqualCharZero
/--
A ring of characteristic zero is not a `ℚ`-algebra iff it has mixed characteristic for some `p`.
-/
theorem isEmpty_algebraRat_iff_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] :
IsEmpty (Algebra ℚ R) ↔ ∃ p > 0, MixedCharZero R p := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
rw [not_isEmpty_iff, ← EqualCharZero.iff_not_mixedCharZero]
apply EqualCharZero.nonempty_algebraRat_iff
/-!
# Splitting statements into different characteristic
Statements to split a proof by characteristic. There are 3 theorems here that are very
similar. They only differ in the assumptions we can make on the positive characteristic
case:
Generally we need to consider all `p ≠ 0`, but if `R` is a local ring, we can assume
that `p` is a prime power. And if `R` is a domain, we can even assume that `p` is prime.
-/
section MainStatements
|
variable {P : Prop}
/-- Split a `Prop` in characteristic zero into equal and mixed characteristic. -/
theorem split_equalCharZero_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] (h_equal : Algebra ℚ R → P)
(h_mixed : ∀ p : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → MixedCharZero R p → P) : P := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/MixedCharZero.lean | 297 | 302 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ￢a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ￢a ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem hnot_bot : ￢(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_top : ￢(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
theorem hnot_hnot_le : ￢￢a ≤ a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
theorem hnot_anti : Antitone (hnot : α → α) := fun _ _ h => hnot_le_comm.1 <| hnot_hnot_le.trans h
theorem hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ￢b ≤ ￢a :=
hnot_anti h
@[simp]
theorem hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ￢￢￢a = ￢a :=
hnot_hnot_le.antisymm <| hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : Codisjoint (￢￢a) b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_right_iff : Codisjoint a (￢￢b) ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, hnot_hnot_hnot]
theorem le_hnot_inf_hnot : ￢(a ⊔ b) ≤ ￢a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf (hnot_anti le_sup_left) <| hnot_anti le_sup_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sup_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a ⊔ b) = ￢￢a ⊔ ￢￢b := by
refine ((hnot_inf_distrib _ _).ge.trans <| hnot_anti le_hnot_inf_hnot).antisymm' ?_
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_assoc, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff,
codisjoint_left_comm, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff, ← codisjoint_assoc, sup_comm]
exact codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sdiff_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a \ b) = ￢￢a \ ￢￢b := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine hnot_le_comm.1 ((hnot_anti sdiff_le_inf_hnot).trans' ?_)
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, codisjoint_left_comm, ←
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right]
exact le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sdiff_le_iff, ← hnot_hnot_sup_distrib]
exact hnot_anti (hnot_anti le_sup_sdiff)
instance OrderDual.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
compl := toDual ∘ hnot ∘ ofDual
himp a b := toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
himp_bot := @top_sdiff' α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_compl (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual aᶜ = ￢ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_himp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇨ b) = ofDual b \ ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_hnot (a : α) : toDual (￢a) = (toDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sdiff (a b : α) : toDual (a \ b) = toDual b ⇨ toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instCoheytingAlgebra [CoheytingAlgebra β] : CoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨top_sdiff' a.1, top_sdiff' a.2⟩
instance Pi.instCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CoheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
CoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
top_sdiff f := funext fun i ↦ top_sdiff' (f i)
end CoheytingAlgebra
section BiheytingAlgebra
variable [BiheytingAlgebra α] {a : α}
theorem compl_le_hnot : aᶜ ≤ ￢a :=
(disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint _ a).le_of_codisjoint codisjoint_hnot_right
end BiheytingAlgebra
/-- Propositions form a Heyting algebra with implication as Heyting implication and negation as
complement. -/
instance Prop.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra Prop :=
{ Prop.instDistribLattice, Prop.instBoundedOrder with
himp := (· → ·),
le_himp_iff := fun _ _ _ => and_imp.symm, himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem himp_iff_imp (p q : Prop) : p ⇨ q ↔ p → q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem compl_iff_not (p : Prop) : pᶜ ↔ ¬p :=
Iff.rfl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A bounded linear order is a bi-Heyting algebra by setting
* `a ⇨ b = ⊤` if `a ≤ b` and `a ⇨ b = b` otherwise.
* `a \ b = ⊥` if `a ≤ b` and `a \ b = a` otherwise. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra [LinearOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : BiheytingAlgebra α :=
{ LinearOrder.toLattice, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊤ else b,
compl := fun a => if a = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true le_top (inf_le_of_right_le h)
· rw [inf_le_iff, or_iff_left h],
himp_bot := fun _ => if_congr le_bot_iff rfl rfl, sdiff := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊥ else a,
hnot := fun a => if a = ⊤ then ⊥ else ⊤,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true bot_le (le_sup_of_le_left h)
· rw [le_sup_iff, or_iff_right h],
top_sdiff := fun _ => if_congr top_le_iff rfl rfl }
instance OrderDual.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] : BiheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Prod.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] :
BiheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instBiheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, BiheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
BiheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedHeytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α]
[HImp α] [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Top α›
__ := ‹HImp α›
le_top := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_top]
exact le_top,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_himp, map_inf, le_himp_iff] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Bot α]
[SDiff α] [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Bot α›
__ := ‹SDiff α›
bot_le := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_bot]
exact bot_le,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_sdiff, map_sup, sdiff_le_iff] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `HeytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.heytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α] [Bot α]
[HasCompl α] [HImp α] [HeytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ)
(map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.generalizedHeytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_himp
__ := ‹Bot α›
__ := ‹HasCompl α›
bot_le := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_bot]
exact bot_le,
himp_bot := fun a => hf <| by rw [map_himp, map_compl, map_bot, himp_bot] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `CoheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.coheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α] [Bot α]
[HNot α] [SDiff α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_hnot : ∀ a, f (￢a) = ￢f a)
(map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_bot map_sdiff
__ := ‹Top α›
__ := ‹HNot α›
le_top := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_top]
exact le_top,
top_sdiff := fun a => hf <| by rw [map_sdiff, map_hnot, map_top, top_sdiff'] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `BiheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.biheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α] [Bot α]
[HasCompl α] [HNot α] [HImp α] [SDiff α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β)
(hf : Injective f) (map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b)
| (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b) (map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥)
(map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ) (map_hnot : ∀ a, f (￢a) = ￢f a)
(map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
BiheytingAlgebra α :=
{ hf.heytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_bot map_compl map_himp,
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 1,057 | 1,061 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
| contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 337 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
dsimp only [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem
unfold erase
revert h_mem; cases cmpLE x t_x <;> intro h_mem <;> dsimp only at h_mem ⊢
· have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_l_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.left
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_l_h
rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz
(Or.inl (Exists.intro t_l.size (And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_l, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_l_size := pos_size_of_mem h.left.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_l_size; rcases t_l.size with - | t_l_size <;> intro h_pos_t_l_size
· cases h_pos_t_l_size
· simp [Nat.add_right_comm]
· rw [(Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1).2, h.sz.1]; rfl
· have t_ih_r := t_ih_r' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_r_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.right
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_r_h
rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz
(Or.inr (Exists.intro t_r.size (And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_r, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_r_size := pos_size_of_mem h.right.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_r_size; rcases t_r.size with - | t_r_size <;> intro h_pos_t_r_size
· cases h_pos_t_r_size
· simp [Nat.add_assoc]
end Valid
end Ordnode
/-- An `Ordset α` is a finite set of values, represented as a tree. The operations on this type
maintain that the tree is balanced and correctly stores subtree sizes at each level. The
correctness property of the tree is baked into the type, so all operations on this type are correct
by construction. -/
def Ordset (α : Type*) [Preorder α] :=
{ t : Ordnode α // t.Valid }
namespace Ordset
open Ordnode
variable [Preorder α]
/-- O(1). The empty set. -/
nonrec def nil : Ordset α :=
⟨nil, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
/-- O(1). Get the size of the set. -/
def size (s : Ordset α) : ℕ :=
s.1.size
/-- O(1). Construct a singleton set containing value `a`. -/
protected def singleton (a : α) : Ordset α :=
⟨singleton a, valid_singleton⟩
instance instEmptyCollection : EmptyCollection (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instSingleton : Singleton α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.singleton⟩
/-- O(1). Is the set empty? -/
def Empty (s : Ordset α) : Prop :=
s = ∅
theorem empty_iff {s : Ordset α} : s = ∅ ↔ s.1.empty :=
⟨fun h => by cases h; exact rfl,
fun h => by cases s with | mk s_val _ => cases s_val <;> [rfl; cases h]⟩
instance Empty.instDecidablePred : DecidablePred (@Empty α _) :=
fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ empty_iff
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, this replaces it. -/
protected def insert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.insert x s.1, insert.valid _ s.2⟩
instance instInsert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] : Insert α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.insert⟩
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, the set is returned as is. -/
nonrec def insert' [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨insert' x s.1, insert'.valid _ s.2⟩
section
variable [DecidableLE α]
/-- O(log n). Does the set contain the element `x`? That is,
is there an element that is equivalent to `x` in the order? -/
def mem (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Bool :=
x ∈ s.val
/-- O(log n). Retrieve an element in the set that is equivalent to `x` in the order,
if it exists. -/
def find (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Option α :=
Ordnode.find x s.val
instance instMembership : Membership α (Ordset α) :=
⟨fun s x => mem x s⟩
instance mem.decidable (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
instDecidableEqBool _ _
theorem pos_size_of_mem {x : α} {t : Ordset α} (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by
simp? [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem says
simp only [Membership.mem, mem, Bool.decide_eq_true] at h_mem
apply Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem t.property.sz h_mem
end
/-- O(log n). Remove an element from the set equivalent to `x`. Does nothing if there
is no such element. -/
def erase [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.erase x s.val, Ordnode.erase.valid x s.property⟩
/-- O(n). Map a function across a tree, without changing the structure. -/
def map {β} [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset β :=
⟨Ordnode.map f s.val, Ordnode.map.valid f_strict_mono s.property⟩
end Ordset
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,307 | 1,314 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 1,128 | 1,128 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Ralf Stephan
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
/-!
# Smooth numbers
For `s : Finset ℕ` we define the set `Nat.factoredNumbers s` of "`s`-factored numbers"
consisting of the positive natural numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`, and
we provide some API for this.
We then define the set `Nat.smoothNumbers n` consisting of the positive natural numbers all of
whose prime factors are strictly less than `n`. This is the special case `s = Finset.range n`
of the set of `s`-factored numbers.
We also define the finite set `Nat.primesBelow n` to be the set of prime numbers less than `n`.
The main definition `Nat.equivProdNatSmoothNumbers` establishes the bijection between
`ℕ × (smoothNumbers p)` and `smoothNumbers (p+1)` given by sending `(e, n)` to `p^e * n`.
Here `p` is a prime number. It is obtained from the more general bijection between
`ℕ × (factoredNumbers s)` and `factoredNumbers (s ∪ {p})`; see `Nat.equivProdNatFactoredNumbers`.
Additionally, we define `Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo N n` as the `Finset` of `n`-smooth numbers
up to and including `N`, and similarly `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo` for its complement in `{1, ..., N}`,
and we provide some API, in particular bounds for their cardinalities; see
`Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo_card_le` and `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo_card_le`.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Nat
/-- `primesBelow n` is the set of primes less than `n` as a `Finset`. -/
def primesBelow (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := {p ∈ Finset.range n | p.Prime}
@[simp]
lemma primesBelow_zero : primesBelow 0 = ∅ := by
rw [primesBelow, Finset.range_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
lemma mem_primesBelow {k n : ℕ} :
n ∈ primesBelow k ↔ n < k ∧ n.Prime := by simp [primesBelow]
lemma prime_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p.Prime :=
(Finset.mem_filter.mp h).2
lemma lt_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p < n :=
Finset.mem_range.mp <| Finset.mem_of_mem_filter p h
lemma primesBelow_succ (n : ℕ) :
primesBelow (n + 1) = if n.Prime then insert n (primesBelow n) else primesBelow n := by
rw [primesBelow, primesBelow, Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
lemma not_mem_primesBelow (n : ℕ) : n ∉ primesBelow n :=
fun hn ↦ (lt_of_mem_primesBelow hn).false
/-!
### `s`-factored numbers
-/
/-- `factoredNumbers s`, for a finite set `s` of natural numbers, is the set of positive natural
numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`. -/
def factoredNumbers (s : Finset ℕ) : Set ℕ := {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
lemma mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Membership in `Nat.factoredNumbers n` is decidable. -/
instance (s : Finset ℕ) : DecidablePred (· ∈ factoredNumbers s) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun x ↦ x ∈ {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
/-- A number that divides an `s`-factored number is itself `s`-factored. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_of_dvd {s : Finset ℕ} {m k : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s)
(h' : k ∣ m) :
k ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h
have hk := ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero h₁ h'
refine ⟨hk, fun p hp ↦ h₂ p ?_⟩
rw [mem_primeFactorsList <| by assumption] at hp ⊢
exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.trans h'⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if `m` is nonzero and all prime divisors `≤ m` of `m`
are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ≤ m, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
simp_rw [mem_factoredNumbers, mem_primeFactorsList']
exact ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ ⟨H₀, fun p _ hp₂ hp₃ ↦ H₁ p ⟨hp₂, hp₃, H₀⟩⟩,
fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦
⟨H₀, fun p ⟨hp₁, hp₂, hp₃⟩ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp₃) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂⟩⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if all prime divisors of `m` are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers' {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ ∀ p, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := exists_infinite_primes (1 + Finset.sup s id)
rw [mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le]
refine ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ fun p hp₁ hp₂ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H₀) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂,
fun H ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ lt_irrefl p ?_, fun p _ ↦ H p⟩⟩
calc
p ≤ s.sup id := Finset.le_sup (f := @id ℕ) <| H p hp₂ <| h.symm ▸ dvd_zero p
_ < 1 + s.sup id := lt_one_add _
_ ≤ p := hp₁
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) : m ≠ 0 :=
h.1
|
/-- The `Finset` of prime factors of an `s`-factored number is contained in `s`. -/
lemma primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ}
(hm : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
m.primeFactors ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_factoredNumbers] at hm
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SmoothNumbers.lean | 109 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
@[simp]
| theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 372 | 375 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Conditional expectation of real-valued functions
This file proves some results regarding the conditional expectation of real-valued functions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp`: the conditional expectation `μ[f | m]` is equal to the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `fμ` restricted on `m` with respect to `μ` restricted on `m`.
* `MeasureTheory.Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condExp`: the conditional expectation of a function
form a uniformly integrable class.
* `MeasureTheory.condExp_mul_of_stronglyMeasurable_left`: the pull-out property of the conditional
expectation.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp := rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
theorem eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm (f : α → ℝ) : eLpNorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ eLpNorm f 1 μ := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_integrable hf, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hsig : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hsig, eLpNorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
calc
eLpNorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ eLpNorm (μ[(|f|)|m]) 1 μ := by
refine eLpNorm_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [condExp_mono hf hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
(condExp_neg ..).symm.le.trans (condExp_mono hf.neg hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => neg_le_abs (f x) : ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂
_ = eLpNorm f 1 μ := by
rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm,
← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp integrable_condExp.2).ne
(hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm.mp hf.2).ne,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_enorm
(stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_enorm hf.1]
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← integral_condExp hm]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[(|f|)|m] := by
rw [← condExp_zero]
exact condExp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias eLpNorm_one_condexp_le_eLpNorm := eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm
theorem integral_abs_condExp_le (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ x, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, |f x| ∂μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero]
positivity
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp only [condExp_of_not_integrable hfint, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero]
positivity
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
· apply ENNReal.toReal_mono <;> simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
· exact hfint.2.ne
· rw [← eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, ← eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
exact eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm _
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact hfint.1.norm
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable.norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias integral_abs_condexp_le := integral_abs_condExp_le
theorem setIntegral_abs_condExp_le {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (f : α → ℝ) :
∫ x in s, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, |f x| ∂μ := by
by_cases hnm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hnm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero]
positivity
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp only [condExp_of_not_integrable hfint, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero]
positivity
have : ∫ x in s, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ = ∫ x, |(μ[s.indicator f|m]) x| ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_indicator (hnm _ hs)]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : (fun x => |(μ[s.indicator f|m]) x|) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => |s.indicator (μ[f|m]) x| :=
(condExp_indicator hfint hs).fun_comp abs
refine EventuallyEq.trans (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_) this.symm
rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw [this, ← integral_indicator (hnm _ hs)]
refine (integral_abs_condExp_le _).trans
(le_of_eq <| integral_congr_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias setIntegral_abs_condexp_le := setIntegral_abs_condExp_le
/-- If the real valued function `f` is bounded almost everywhere by `R`, then so is its conditional
expectation. -/
theorem ae_bdd_condExp_of_ae_bdd {R : ℝ≥0} {f : α → ℝ} (hbdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, |f x| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, |(μ[f|m]) x| ≤ R := by
by_cases hnm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hnm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero]
exact Eventually.of_forall fun _ => R.coe_nonneg
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp_rw [condExp_of_not_integrable hfint]
filter_upwards [hbdd] with x hx
rw [Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero]
exact (abs_nonneg _).trans hx
by_contra h
change μ _ ≠ 0 at h
simp only [← zero_lt_iff, Set.compl_def, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_le] at h
suffices μ.real {x | ↑R < |(μ[f|m]) x|} * ↑R < μ.real {x | ↑R < |(μ[f|m]) x|} * ↑R by
exact this.ne rfl
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (setIntegral_gt_gt R.coe_nonneg ?_ h.ne') ?_
· exact integrable_condExp.abs.integrableOn
refine (setIntegral_abs_condExp_le ?_ _).trans ?_
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact @measurableSet_lt _ _ _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ _ measurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_condExp.norm.measurable
simp only [← smul_eq_mul, ← setIntegral_const, NNReal.val_eq_coe, RCLike.ofReal_real_eq_id,
_root_.id]
refine setIntegral_mono_ae hfint.abs.integrableOn ?_ hbdd
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, lt_of_le_of_lt ?_
(integrable_condExp.integrableOn : IntegrableOn (μ[f|m]) {x | ↑R < |(μ[f|m]) x|} μ).2⟩
refine setLIntegral_mono
(stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono hnm).measurable.nnnorm.coe_nnreal_ennreal fun x hx => ?_
rw [enorm_eq_nnnorm, enorm_eq_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg R.coe_nonneg]
exact Subtype.mk_le_mk.2 (le_of_lt hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ae_bdd_condexp_of_ae_bdd := ae_bdd_condExp_of_ae_bdd
/-- Given an integrable function `g`, the conditional expectations of `g` with respect to
a sequence of sub-σ-algebras is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condExp {ι : Type*} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {g : α → ℝ}
(hint : Integrable g μ) {ℱ : ι → MeasurableSpace α} (hℱ : ∀ i, ℱ i ≤ m0) :
UniformIntegrable (fun i => μ[g|ℱ i]) 1 μ := by
let A : MeasurableSpace α := m0
have hmeas : ∀ n, ∀ C, MeasurableSet {x | C ≤ ‖(μ[g|ℱ n]) x‖₊} := fun n C =>
measurableSet_le measurable_const (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono (hℱ n)).measurable.nnnorm
have hg : MemLp g 1 μ := memLp_one_iff_integrable.2 hint
refine uniformIntegrable_of le_rfl ENNReal.one_ne_top
(fun n => (stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono (hℱ n)).aestronglyMeasurable) fun ε hε => ?_
by_cases hne : eLpNorm g 1 μ = 0
· rw [eLpNorm_eq_zero_iff hg.1 one_ne_zero] at hne
refine ⟨0, fun n => (le_of_eq <|
(eLpNorm_eq_zero_iff ((stronglyMeasurable_condExp.mono (hℱ n)).aestronglyMeasurable.indicator
(hmeas n 0)) one_ne_zero).2 ?_).trans (zero_le _)⟩
filter_upwards [condExp_congr_ae (m := ℱ n) hne] with x hx
simp only [zero_le', Set.setOf_true, Set.indicator_univ, Pi.zero_apply, hx, condExp_zero]
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, h⟩ := hg.eLpNorm_indicator_le le_rfl ENNReal.one_ne_top hε
set C : ℝ≥0 := ⟨δ, hδ.le⟩⁻¹ * (eLpNorm g 1 μ).toNNReal with hC
have hCpos : 0 < C := mul_pos (inv_pos.2 hδ) (ENNReal.toNNReal_pos hne hg.eLpNorm_lt_top.ne)
have : ∀ n, μ {x : α | C ≤ ‖(μ[g|ℱ n]) x‖₊} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ := by
intro n
have := mul_meas_ge_le_pow_eLpNorm' μ one_ne_zero ENNReal.one_ne_top
((stronglyMeasurable_condExp (m := ℱ n) (μ := μ) (f := g)).mono (hℱ n)).aestronglyMeasurable C
rw [ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.rpow_one, ENNReal.rpow_one, mul_comm, ←
ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hCpos.ne'))
(Or.inl ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne)] at this
simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_le_coe] at this
refine this.trans ?_
rw [ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hCpos.ne'))
(Or.inl ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne),
hC, Nonneg.inv_mk, ENNReal.coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hg.eLpNorm_lt_top.ne, ← mul_assoc, ←
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul hδ.le, mul_inv_cancel₀ hδ.ne',
ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul]
exact eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm _
refine ⟨C, fun n => le_trans ?_ (h {x : α | C ≤ ‖(μ[g|ℱ n]) x‖₊} (hmeas n C) (this n))⟩
have hmeasℱ : MeasurableSet[ℱ n] {x : α | C ≤ ‖(μ[g|ℱ n]) x‖₊} :=
@measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) _ _ _ _ _ measurable_const
(@Measurable.nnnorm _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ n) _ stronglyMeasurable_condExp.measurable)
rw [← eLpNorm_congr_ae (condExp_indicator hint hmeasℱ)]
exact eLpNorm_one_condExp_le_eLpNorm _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condexp := Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condExp
section PullOut
-- TODO: this section could be generalized beyond multiplication, to any bounded bilinear map.
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `condExp_mul_of_stronglyMeasurable_left`. -/
| theorem condExp_stronglyMeasurable_simpleFunc_mul (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @SimpleFunc α m ℝ) {g : α → ℝ}
(hg : Integrable g μ) : μ[(f * g : α → ℝ)|m] =ᵐ[μ] f * μ[g|m] := by
have : ∀ (s c) (f : α → ℝ), Set.indicator s (Function.const α c) * f = s.indicator (c • f) := by
intro s c f
ext1 x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, Pi.mul_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem, Pi.smul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
Function.const_apply]
· simp only [hx, Pi.mul_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff, zero_mul]
apply @SimpleFunc.induction _ _ m _ (fun f => _)
(fun c s hs => ?_) (fun g₁ g₂ _ h_eq₁ h_eq₂ => ?_) f
· simp only [SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise,
SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator]
rw [this, this]
refine (condExp_indicator (hg.smul c) hs).trans ?_
filter_upwards [condExp_smul c g m] with x hx
classical simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply, hx]
· have h_add := @SimpleFunc.coe_add _ _ m _ g₁ g₂
calc
μ[⇑(g₁ + g₂) * g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[(⇑g₁ + ⇑g₂) * g|m] := by
refine condExp_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.mul ?_ EventuallyEq.rfl); rw [h_add]
_ =ᵐ[μ] μ[⇑g₁ * g|m] + μ[⇑g₂ * g|m] := by
rw [add_mul]; exact condExp_add (hg.simpleFunc_mul' hm _) (hg.simpleFunc_mul' hm _) _
_ =ᵐ[μ] ⇑g₁ * μ[g|m] + ⇑g₂ * μ[g|m] := EventuallyEq.add h_eq₁ h_eq₂
_ =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(g₁ + g₂) * μ[g|m] := by rw [h_add, add_mul]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 230 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 350 | 358 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 1,732 | 1,734 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using 3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (‖y‖ : ℂ), norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
theorem arg_div_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x / y) : Real.Angle) = arg x - arg y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, arg_mul_coe_angle hx (inv_ne_zero hy), arg_inv_coe_angle, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_pow_coe_angle (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
(arg (x ^ n) : Real.Angle) = n • (arg x : Real.Angle) := by
obtain rfl | x0 := eq_or_ne x 0
· by_cases n0 : n = 0 <;> simp [n0]
· induction n with
| zero => simp [x0]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, arg_mul_coe_angle (pow_ne_zero n x0) x0, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem arg_zpow_coe_angle (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
(arg (x ^ n) : Real.Angle) = n • (arg x : Real.Angle) := by
match n with
| Int.ofNat m => simp [arg_pow_coe_angle]
| Int.negSucc m => simp [arg_pow_coe_angle]
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg (z : ℂ) : (arg z : Real.Angle).toReal = arg z := by
rw [Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
exact arg_mem_Ioc _
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal {z : ℂ} {θ : Real.Angle} :
(arg z : Real.Angle) = θ ↔ arg z = θ.toReal := by
rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff {x y : ℂ} : (arg x : Real.Angle) = arg y ↔ arg x = arg y := by
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
lemma arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).arg = x.arg + y.arg ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [← arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg, arg_mul_coe_angle hx₀ hy₀, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
alias ⟨_, arg_mul⟩ := arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff
section slitPlane
open ComplexOrder in
/-- An alternative description of the slit plane as consisting of nonzero complex numbers
whose argument is not π. -/
lemma mem_slitPlane_iff_arg {z : ℂ} : z ∈ slitPlane ↔ z.arg ≠ π ∧ z ≠ 0 := by
simp only [mem_slitPlane_iff_not_le_zero, le_iff_lt_or_eq, ne_eq, arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero, not_or]
|
lemma slitPlane_arg_ne_pi {z : ℂ} (hz : z ∈ slitPlane) : z.arg ≠ Real.pi :=
(mem_slitPlane_iff_arg.mp hz).1
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 535 | 537 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Bivariate
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Weierstrass
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.VariableChange
/-!
# Affine coordinates for Weierstrass curves
This file defines the type of points on a Weierstrass curve as an inductive, consisting of the point
at infinity and affine points satisfying a Weierstrass equation with a nonsingular condition. This
file also defines the negation and addition operations of the group law for this type, and proves
that they respect the Weierstrass equation and the nonsingular condition. The fact that they form an
abelian group is proven in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` with coefficients `aᵢ`. An *affine point*
on `W` is a tuple `(x, y)` of elements in `R` satisfying the *Weierstrass equation* `W(X, Y) = 0` in
*affine coordinates*, where `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)`. It is
*nonsingular* if its partial derivatives `W_X(x, y)` and `W_Y(x, y)` do not vanish simultaneously.
The nonsingular affine points on `W` can be given negation and addition operations defined by a
secant-and-tangent process.
* Given a nonsingular affine point `P`, its *negation* `-P` is defined to be the unique third
nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the vertical line through `P`.
Explicitly, if `P` is `(x, y)`, then `-P` is `(x, -y - a₁x - a₃)`.
* Given two nonsingular affine points `P` and `Q`, their *addition* `P + Q` is defined to be the
negation of the unique third nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the line `L`
through `P` and `Q`. Explicitly, let `P` be `(x₁, y₁)` and let `Q` be `(x₂, y₂)`.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ = -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is vertical.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ ≠ -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is the tangent of `W` at `P = Q`, and has
slope `ℓ := (3x₁² + 2a₂x₁ + a₄ - a₁y₁) / (2y₁ + a₁x₁ + a₃)`.
* Otherwise `x₁ ≠ x₂`, then `L` is the secant of `W` through `P` and `Q`, and has slope
`ℓ := (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)`.
In the last two cases, the `X`-coordinate of `P + Q` is then the unique third solution of the
equation obtained by substituting the line `Y = ℓ(X - x₁) + y₁` into the Weierstrass equation,
and can be written down explicitly as `x := ℓ² + a₁ℓ - a₂ - x₁ - x₂` by inspecting the
coefficients of `X²`. The `Y`-coordinate of `P + Q`, after applying the final negation that maps
`Y` to `-Y - a₁X - a₃`, is precisely `y := -(ℓ(x - x₁) + y₁) - a₁x - a₃`.
The type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine coordinates is an inductive, consisting of the
unique point at infinity `𝓞` and nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. Then `W⟮F⟯` can be endowed with
a group law, with `𝓞` as the identity nonsingular point, which is uniquely determined by these
formulae.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Equation`: the Weierstrass equation of an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Nonsingular`: the nonsingular condition on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point`: a nonsingular rational point on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.neg`: the negation operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.add`: the addition operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_neg`: negation preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_add`: addition preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_neg`: negation preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_add`: addition preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero`: an affine Weierstrass curve is nonsingular at
every point if its discriminant is non-zero.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular`: an affine elliptic curve is nonsingular at every point.
## Notations
* `W⟮K⟯`: the group of nonsingular rational points on `W` base changed to `K`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, rational point, affine coordinates
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "derivative_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [derivative_C, derivative_X, derivative_X_pow, derivative_neg, derivative_add,
derivative_sub, derivative_mul, derivative_sq])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow, evalEval])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add, Polynomial.map_sub,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v w
/-! ## Weierstrass curves -/
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} {A F : Type u} {B K : Type v} {L : Type w}
variable (R) in
/-- An abbreviation for a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates. -/
abbrev Affine : Type r :=
WeierstrassCurve R
/-- The conversion from a Weierstrass curve to affine coordinates. -/
abbrev toAffine (W : WeierstrassCurve R) : Affine R :=
W
namespace Affine
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Field F] [Field K] [Field L]
{W' : Affine R} {W : Affine F}
section Equation
/-! ### Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The polynomial `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)` associated to a Weierstrass
curve `W` over a ring `R` in affine coordinates.
For ease of polynomial manipulation, this is represented as a term of type `R[X][X]`, where the
inner variable represents `X` and the outer variable represents `Y`. For clarity, the alternative
notations `Y` and `R[X][Y]` are provided in the `Polynomial.Bivariate` scope to represent the outer
variable and the bivariate polynomial ring `R[X][X]` respectively. -/
noncomputable def polynomial : R[X][Y] :=
Y ^ 2 + C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃) * Y - C (X ^ 3 + C W'.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W'.a₄ * X + C W'.a₆)
lemma polynomial_eq : W'.polynomial = Cubic.toPoly
⟨0, 1, Cubic.toPoly ⟨0, 0, W'.a₁, W'.a₃⟩, Cubic.toPoly ⟨-1, -W'.a₂, -W'.a₄, -W'.a₆⟩⟩ := by
simp only [polynomial, Cubic.toPoly]
C_simp
ring1
lemma polynomial_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial ≠ 0 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma degree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.degree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
lemma monic_polynomial : W'.polynomial.Monic := by
nontriviality R
simpa only [polynomial_eq] using Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
lemma irreducible_polynomial [IsDomain R] : Irreducible W'.polynomial := by
by_contra h
rcases (monic_polynomial.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff natDegree_polynomial).mp h
with ⟨f, g, h0, h1⟩
simp only [polynomial_eq, Cubic.coeff_eq_c, Cubic.coeff_eq_d] at h0 h1
apply_fun degree at h0 h1
rw [Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' <| neg_ne_zero.mpr <| one_ne_zero' R, degree_mul] at h0
apply (h1.symm.le.trans Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero').not_lt
rcases Nat.WithBot.add_eq_three_iff.mp h0.symm with h | h | h | h
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
lemma evalEval_polynomial (x y : R) : W'.polynomial.evalEval x y =
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) := by
simp only [polynomial]
eval_simp
rw [add_mul, ← add_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomial_zero : W'.polynomial.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₆ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomial, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
variable (W') in
/-- The proposition that an affine point `(x, y)` lies in a Weierstrass curve `W`.
In other words, it satisfies the Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0`. -/
def Equation (x y : R) : Prop :=
W'.polynomial.evalEval x y = 0
lemma equation_iff' (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial]
lemma equation_iff (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y = x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆ := by
rw [equation_iff', sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma equation_zero : W'.Equation 0 0 ↔ W'.a₆ = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial_zero, neg_eq_zero]
lemma equation_iff_variableChange (x y : R) :
W'.Equation x y ↔ (VariableChange.mk 1 x 0 y • W').toAffine.Equation 0 0 := by
rw [equation_iff', ← neg_eq_zero, equation_zero, variableChange_a₆, inv_one, Units.val_one]
congr! 1
ring1
end Equation
section Nonsingular
/-! ### Nonsingular Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_X(X, Y)` with respect to `X` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
-- TODO: define this in terms of `Polynomial.derivative`.
noncomputable def polynomialX : R[X][Y] :=
C (C W'.a₁) * Y - C (C 3 * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W'.a₂) * X + C W'.a₄)
lemma evalEval_polynomialX (x y : R) :
W'.polynomialX.evalEval x y = W'.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄) := by
simp only [polynomialX]
eval_simp
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomialX_zero : W'.polynomialX.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₄ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomialX, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_Y(X, Y)` with respect to `Y` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
-- TODO: define this in terms of `Polynomial.derivative`.
noncomputable def polynomialY : R[X][Y] :=
C (C 2) * Y + C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃)
lemma evalEval_polynomialY (x y : R) : W'.polynomialY.evalEval x y = 2 * y + W'.a₁ * x + W'.a₃ := by
simp only [polynomialY]
eval_simp
rw [← add_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomialY_zero : W'.polynomialY.evalEval 0 0 = W'.a₃ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomialY, zero_add, mul_zero]
variable (W') in
/-- The proposition that an affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve `W` is nonsingular.
In other words, either `W_X(x, y) ≠ 0` or `W_Y(x, y) ≠ 0`.
Note that this definition is only mathematically accurate for fields. -/
-- TODO: generalise this definition to be mathematically accurate for a larger class of rings.
def Nonsingular (x y : R) : Prop :=
W'.Equation x y ∧ (W'.polynomialX.evalEval x y ≠ 0 ∨ W'.polynomialY.evalEval x y ≠ 0)
lemma nonsingular_iff' (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ W'.Equation x y ∧
(W'.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄) ≠ 0 ∨ 2 * y + W'.a₁ * x + W'.a₃ ≠ 0) := by
rw [Nonsingular, equation_iff', evalEval_polynomialX, evalEval_polynomialY]
lemma nonsingular_iff (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ W'.Equation x y ∧
(W'.a₁ * y ≠ 3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄ ∨ y ≠ -y - W'.a₁ * x - W'.a₃) := by
rw [nonsingular_iff', sub_ne_zero, ← sub_ne_zero (a := y)]
congr! 3
ring1
@[simp]
lemma nonsingular_zero : W'.Nonsingular 0 0 ↔ W'.a₆ = 0 ∧ (W'.a₃ ≠ 0 ∨ W'.a₄ ≠ 0) := by
rw [Nonsingular, equation_zero, evalEval_polynomialX_zero, neg_ne_zero, evalEval_polynomialY_zero,
or_comm]
lemma nonsingular_iff_variableChange (x y : R) :
W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ (VariableChange.mk 1 x 0 y • W').toAffine.Nonsingular 0 0 := by
rw [nonsingular_iff', equation_iff_variableChange, equation_zero, ← neg_ne_zero, or_comm,
nonsingular_zero, variableChange_a₃, variableChange_a₄, inv_one, Units.val_one]
simp only [variableChange_def]
congr! 3 <;> ring1
private lemma equation_zero_iff_nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero (hΔ : W'.Δ ≠ 0) :
W'.Equation 0 0 ↔ W'.Nonsingular 0 0 := by
simp only [equation_zero, nonsingular_zero, iff_self_and]
contrapose! hΔ
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈, Δ, hΔ]
ring1
/-- A Weierstrass curve is nonsingular at every point if its discriminant is non-zero. -/
lemma equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero {x y : R} (hΔ : W'.Δ ≠ 0) :
W'.Equation x y ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
rw [equation_iff_variableChange, nonsingular_iff_variableChange,
equation_zero_iff_nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero <| by
rwa [variableChange_Δ, inv_one, Units.val_one, one_pow, one_mul]]
/-- An elliptic curve is nonsingular at every point. -/
lemma equation_iff_nonsingular [Nontrivial R] [W'.IsElliptic] {x y : R} :
W'.toAffine.Equation x y ↔ W'.toAffine.Nonsingular x y :=
W'.toAffine.equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero <| W'.coe_Δ' ▸ W'.Δ'.ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero :=
equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero :=
equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular := equation_iff_nonsingular
end Nonsingular
section Ring
/-! ### Group operation polynomials over a ring -/
variable (W') in
/-- The negation polynomial `-Y - a₁X - a₃` associated to the negation of a nonsingular affine point
on a Weierstrass curve. -/
noncomputable def negPolynomial : R[X][Y] :=
-(Y : R[X][Y]) - C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃)
lemma Y_sub_polynomialY : Y - W'.polynomialY = W'.negPolynomial := by
rw [polynomialY, negPolynomial]
C_simp
ring1
lemma Y_sub_negPolynomial : Y - W'.negPolynomial = W'.polynomialY := by
rw [← Y_sub_polynomialY, sub_sub_cancel]
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `-(x, y)` for a nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve
`W`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`. -/
@[simp]
def negY (x y : R) : R :=
-y - W'.a₁ * x - W'.a₃
lemma negY_negY (x y : R) : W'.negY x (W'.negY x y) = y := by
simp only [negY]
ring1
lemma evalEval_negPolynomial (x y : R) : W'.negPolynomial.evalEval x y = W'.negY x y := by
rw [negY, sub_sub, negPolynomial]
eval_simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias eval_negPolynomial := evalEval_negPolynomial
/-- The line polynomial `ℓ(X - x) + y` associated to the line `Y = ℓ(X - x) + y` that passes through
a nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve `W` with a slope of `ℓ`.
This does not depend on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`, `ℓ`. -/
noncomputable def linePolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : R[X] :=
C ℓ * (X - C x) + C y
variable (W') in
/-- The addition polynomial obtained by substituting the line `Y = ℓ(X - x) + y` into the polynomial
`W(X, Y)` associated to a Weierstrass curve `W`. If such a line intersects `W` at another
nonsingular affine point `(x', y')` on `W`, then the roots of this polynomial are precisely `x`,
`x'`, and the `X`-coordinate of the addition of `(x, y)` and `(x', y')`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`, `ℓ`. -/
noncomputable def addPolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : R[X] :=
W'.polynomial.eval <| linePolynomial x y ℓ
lemma C_addPolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : C (W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ) =
(Y - C (linePolynomial x y ℓ)) * (W'.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x y ℓ)) +
W'.polynomial := by
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial, negPolynomial]
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
lemma addPolynomial_eq (x y ℓ : R) : W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ = -Cubic.toPoly
⟨1, -ℓ ^ 2 - W'.a₁ * ℓ + W'.a₂,
2 * x * ℓ ^ 2 + (W'.a₁ * x - 2 * y - W'.a₃) * ℓ + (-W'.a₁ * y + W'.a₄),
-x ^ 2 * ℓ ^ 2 + (2 * x * y + W'.a₃ * x) * ℓ - (y ^ 2 + W'.a₃ * y - W'.a₆)⟩ := by
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial, Cubic.toPoly]
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
variable (W') in
/-- The `X`-coordinate of `(x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂)` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def addX (x₁ x₂ ℓ : R) : R :=
ℓ ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * ℓ - W'.a₂ - x₁ - x₂
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `-((x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂))` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def negAddY (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : R :=
ℓ * (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ - x₁) + y₁
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `(x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂)` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def addY (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : R :=
W'.negY (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ)
lemma equation_neg (x y : R) : W'.Equation x (W'.negY x y) ↔ W'.Equation x y := by
rw [equation_iff, equation_iff, negY]
congr! 1
ring1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias equation_neg_of := equation_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias equation_neg_iff := equation_neg
lemma nonsingular_neg (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x (W'.negY x y) ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
rw [nonsingular_iff, equation_neg, ← negY, negY_negY, ← @ne_comm _ y, nonsingular_iff]
exact and_congr_right' <| (iff_congr not_and_or.symm not_and_or.symm).mpr <|
not_congr <| and_congr_left fun h => by rw [← h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias nonsingular_neg_of := nonsingular_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias nonsingular_neg_iff := nonsingular_neg
lemma equation_add_iff (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : W'.Equation (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) ↔
(W'.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ ℓ).eval (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) = 0 := by
rw [Equation, negAddY, addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial]
eval_simp
lemma nonsingular_negAdd_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero {x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R}
(hx' : W'.Equation (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ))
(hx : (W'.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ ℓ).derivative.eval (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) ≠ 0) :
W'.Nonsingular (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
rw [Nonsingular, and_iff_right hx', negAddY, polynomialX, polynomialY]
eval_simp
contrapose! hx
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial]
eval_simp
derivative_simp
simp only [zero_add, add_zero, sub_zero, zero_mul, mul_one]
eval_simp
linear_combination (norm := (norm_num1; ring1)) hx.left + ℓ * hx.right
end Ring
section Field
/-! ### Group operation polynomials over a field -/
open Classical in
variable (W) in
/-- The slope of the line through two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and `(x₂, y₂)` on a
Weierstrass curve `W`.
If `x₁ ≠ x₂`, then this line is the secant of `W` through `(x₁, y₁)` and `(x₂, y₂)`, and has slope
`(y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)`. Otherwise, if `y₁ ≠ -y₁ - a₁x₁ - a₃`, then this line is the tangent of `W`
at `(x₁, y₁) = (x₂, y₂)`, and has slope `(3x₁² + 2a₂x₁ + a₄ - a₁y₁) / (2y₁ + a₁x₁ + a₃)`. Otherwise,
this line is vertical, in which case this returns the value `0`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `y₂`. -/
noncomputable def slope (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F) : F :=
if x₁ = x₂ then if y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ then 0
else (3 * x₁ ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x₁ + W.a₄ - W.a₁ * y₁) / (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁)
else (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_Y_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = 0 := by
rw [slope, if_pos hx, if_pos hy]
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ =
(3 * x₁ ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x₁ + W.a₄ - W.a₁ * y₁) / (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) := by
rw [slope, if_pos hx, if_neg hy]
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_X_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂) := by
rw [slope, if_neg hx]
lemma slope_of_Y_ne_eq_evalEval {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = -W.polynomialX.evalEval x₁ y₁ / W.polynomialY.evalEval x₁ y₁ := by
rw [slope_of_Y_ne hx hy, evalEval_polynomialX, neg_sub]
congr 1
rw [negY, evalEval_polynomialY]
ring1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias slope_of_Y_ne_eq_eval := slope_of_Y_ne_eq_evalEval
lemma Y_eq_of_X_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hx : x₁ = x₂) : y₁ = y₂ ∨ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ := by
rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_eq_zero (a := y₁), ← mul_eq_zero, negY]
linear_combination (norm := (rw [hx]; ring1)) h₁ - h₂
lemma Y_eq_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hx : x₁ = x₂)
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
(Y_eq_of_X_eq h₁ h₂ hx).resolve_right hy
lemma addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-((X - C x₁) * (X - C x₂) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_eq, neg_inj, Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq, Cubic.toPoly_injective]
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [slope_of_Y_ne rfl hy]
rw [negY, ← sub_ne_zero] at hy
ext
· rfl
· simp only [addX]
ring1
· field_simp [hy]
ring1
· linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hy]; ring1)) -h₁
· rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [slope_of_X_ne hx]
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
ext
· rfl
· simp only [addX]
ring1
· apply mul_right_injective₀ hx
linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hx]; ring1)) h₂ - h₁
· apply mul_right_injective₀ hx
linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hx]; ring1)) x₂ * h₁ - x₁ * h₂
/-- The negated addition of two affine points in `W` on a sloped line lies in `W`. -/
lemma equation_negAdd {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.Equation
(W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
rw [equation_add_iff, addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
eval_simp
rw [neg_eq_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
/-- The addition of two affine points in `W` on a sloped line lies in `W`. -/
lemma equation_add {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
W.Equation (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) :=
(equation_neg ..).mpr <| equation_negAdd h₁ h₂ hxy
lemma C_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : C (W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-(C (X - C x₁) * C (X - C x₂) * C (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
map_simp
lemma derivative_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
derivative (W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-((X - C x₁) * (X - C x₂) + (X - C x₁) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)) +
(X - C x₂) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
derivative_simp
ring1
/-- The negated addition of two nonsingular affine points in `W` on a sloped line is nonsingular. -/
lemma nonsingular_negAdd {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.Nonsingular
(W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
by_cases hx₁ : W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = x₁
· rwa [negAddY, hx₁, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_add]
· by_cases hx₂ : W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = x₂
· by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· subst hx
contradiction
· rwa [negAddY, ← neg_sub, mul_neg, hx₂, slope_of_X_ne hx,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ <| sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx, neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· apply nonsingular_negAdd_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero <| equation_negAdd h₁.left h₂.left hxy
rw [derivative_addPolynomial_slope h₁.left h₂.left hxy]
eval_simp
simp only [neg_ne_zero, sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
exact mul_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx₁) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx₂)
/-- The addition of two nonsingular affine points in `W` on a sloped line is nonsingular. -/
lemma nonsingular_add {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
W.Nonsingular (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) :=
(nonsingular_neg ..).mpr <| nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ hxy
/-- The formula `x(P₁ + P₂) = x(P₁ - P₂) - ψ(P₁)ψ(P₂) / (x(P₂) - x(P₁))²`,
where `ψ(x,y) = 2y + a₁x + a₃`. -/
lemma addX_eq_addX_negY_sub {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.negY x₂ y₂) -
(y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) * (y₂ - W.negY x₂ y₂) / (x₂ - x₁) ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [slope_of_X_ne hx, addX, negY, ← neg_sub x₁, neg_sq]
field_simp [sub_ne_zero.mpr hx]
ring1
/-- The formula `y(P₁)(x(P₂) - x(P₃)) + y(P₂)(x(P₃) - x(P₁)) + y(P₃)(x(P₁) - x(P₂)) = 0`,
assuming that `P₁ + P₂ + P₃ = O`. -/
lemma cyclic_sum_Y_mul_X_sub_X {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
let x₃ := W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
y₁ * (x₂ - x₃) + y₂ * (x₃ - x₁) + W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) * (x₁ - x₂) = 0 := by
simp_rw [slope_of_X_ne hx, negAddY, addX]
field_simp [sub_ne_zero.mpr hx]
ring1
/-- The formula `ψ(P₁ + P₂) = (ψ(P₂)(x(P₁) - x(P₃)) - ψ(P₁)(x(P₂) - x(P₃))) / (x(P₂) - x(P₁))`,
where `ψ(x,y) = 2y + a₁x + a₃`. -/
lemma addY_sub_negY_addY {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
let x₃ := W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
let y₃ := W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
y₃ - W.negY x₃ y₃ =
((y₂ - W.negY x₂ y₂) * (x₁ - x₃) - (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) * (x₂ - x₃)) / (x₂ - x₁) := by
simp_rw [addY, negY, eq_div_iff (sub_ne_zero.mpr hx.symm)]
linear_combination (norm := ring1) 2 * cyclic_sum_Y_mul_X_sub_X y₁ y₂ hx
end Field
section Group
/-! ### Nonsingular points -/
variable (W') in
/-- A nonsingular point on a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. This is either the unique
point at infinity `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.zero` or a nonsingular affine point
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.some (x, y)` satisfying the Weierstrass equation of `W`. -/
inductive Point
| zero
| some {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y)
/-- For an algebraic extension `S` of a ring `R`, the type of nonsingular `S`-points on a
Weierstrass curve `W` over `R` in affine coordinates. -/
scoped notation3:max W' "⟮" S "⟯" => Affine.Point <| baseChange W' S
namespace Point
/-! ### Group operations -/
instance : Inhabited W'.Point :=
⟨.zero⟩
instance : Zero W'.Point :=
⟨.zero⟩
lemma zero_def : 0 = (.zero : W'.Point) :=
rfl
lemma some_ne_zero {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y) : Point.some h ≠ 0 := by
rintro (_ | _)
/-- The negation of a nonsingular point on a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates.
Given a nonsingular point `P` in affine coordinates, use `-P` instead of `neg P`. -/
def neg : W'.Point → W'.Point
| 0 => 0
| some h => some <| (nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h
instance : Neg W'.Point :=
⟨neg⟩
lemma neg_def (P : W'.Point) : -P = P.neg :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_zero : (-0 : W'.Point) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_some {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y) : -some h = some ((nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h) :=
rfl
instance : InvolutiveNeg W'.Point where
neg_neg := by
rintro (_ | _)
· rfl
· simp only [neg_some, negY_negY]
open Classical in
/-- The addition of two nonsingular points on a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates.
Given two nonsingular points `P` and `Q` in affine coordinates, use `P + Q` instead of `add P Q`. -/
noncomputable def add : W.Point → W.Point → W.Point
| 0, P => P
| P, 0 => P
| @some _ _ _ x₁ y₁ h₁, @some _ _ _ x₂ y₂ h₂ =>
if hxy : x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ then 0 else some <| nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy
noncomputable instance : Add W.Point :=
⟨add⟩
noncomputable instance : AddZeroClass W.Point :=
⟨by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl, by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl⟩
lemma add_def (P Q : W.Point) : P + Q = P.add Q :=
rfl
lemma add_some {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁}
{h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂} : some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy) := by
simp only [add_def, add, dif_neg hxy]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias add_of_imp := add_some
@[simp]
lemma add_of_Y_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = 0 := by
simpa only [add_def, add] using dif_pos ⟨hx, hy⟩
@[simp]
lemma add_self_of_Y_eq {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = 0 :=
add_of_Y_eq rfl hy
@[simp]
lemma add_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_some fun hxy => hy hxy.right
lemma add_of_Y_ne' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
some h₁ + some h₂ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
@[simp]
lemma add_self_of_Y_ne {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₁ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
lemma add_self_of_Y_ne' {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₁ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
@[simp]
lemma add_of_X_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hx hxy.left) :=
add_some fun hxy => hx hxy.left
lemma add_of_X_ne' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hx hxy.left) :=
add_of_X_ne hx
end Point
end Group
section Map
/-! ### Maps across ring homomorphisms -/
variable (f : R →+* S) (x y x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ ℓ : R)
lemma map_polynomial : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomial = W'.polynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomial]
map_simp
lemma evalEval_baseChange_polynomial :
(W'.baseChange R[X][Y]).toAffine.polynomial.evalEval (C X) Y = W'.polynomial := by
rw [map_polynomial, evalEval, eval_map, eval_C_X_eval₂_map_C_X]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias evalEval_baseChange_polynomial_X_Y :=
evalEval_baseChange_polynomial
variable {x y} in
lemma Equation.map {x y : R} (h : W'.Equation x y) : (W'.map f).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) := by
rw [Equation, map_polynomial, map_mapRingHom_evalEval, h, map_zero]
variable {f} in
lemma map_equation (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.map f).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) ↔ W'.Equation x y := by
simp only [Equation, map_polynomial, map_mapRingHom_evalEval, map_eq_zero_iff f hf]
lemma map_polynomialX : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomialX = W'.polynomialX.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomialX]
map_simp
lemma map_polynomialY : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomialY = W'.polynomialY.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomialY]
map_simp
variable {f} in
lemma map_nonsingular (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.map f).toAffine.Nonsingular (f x) (f y) ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
simp only [Nonsingular, evalEval, map_equation _ _ hf, map_polynomialX, map_polynomialY,
map_mapRingHom_evalEval, map_ne_zero_iff f hf]
lemma map_negPolynomial :
(W'.map f).toAffine.negPolynomial = W'.negPolynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [negPolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_negY : (W'.map f).toAffine.negY (f x) (f y) = f (W'.negY x y) := by
simp only [negY]
map_simp
lemma map_linePolynomial : linePolynomial (f x) (f y) (f ℓ) = (linePolynomial x y ℓ).map f := by
simp only [linePolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_addPolynomial :
(W'.map f).toAffine.addPolynomial (f x) (f y) (f ℓ) = (W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ).map f := by
rw [addPolynomial, map_polynomial, eval_map, linePolynomial, addPolynomial, ← coe_mapRingHom,
← eval₂_hom, linePolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_addX : (W'.map f).toAffine.addX (f x₁) (f x₂) (f ℓ) = f (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) := by
simp only [addX]
map_simp
lemma map_negAddY :
(W'.map f).toAffine.negAddY (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f ℓ) = f (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
simp only [negAddY, map_addX]
map_simp
lemma map_addY :
(W'.map f).toAffine.addY (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f ℓ) = f (W'.toAffine.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
simp only [addY, map_negAddY, map_addX, map_negY]
lemma map_slope (f : F →+* K) (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F) :
(W.map f).toAffine.slope (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f y₂) = f (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· by_cases hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂
· rw [slope_of_Y_eq (congr_arg f hx) <| by rw [hy, map_negY], slope_of_Y_eq hx hy, map_zero]
· rw [slope_of_Y_ne (congr_arg f hx) <| map_negY f x₂ y₂ ▸ fun h => hy <| f.injective h,
map_negY, slope_of_Y_ne hx hy]
map_simp
· rw [slope_of_X_ne fun h => hx <| f.injective h, slope_of_X_ne hx]
map_simp
end Map
section BaseChange
/-! ### Base changes across algebra homomorphisms -/
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B]
[IsScalarTower R S B] (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (x y x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ ℓ : A)
lemma baseChange_polynomial : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.polynomial =
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.polynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
rw [← map_polynomial, map_baseChange]
variable {x y} in
lemma Equation.baseChange (h : (W'.baseChange A).toAffine.Equation x y) :
(W'.baseChange B).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) := by
convert Equation.map f.toRingHom h using 1
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_baseChange]
|
variable {f} in
lemma baseChange_equation (hf : Function.Injective f) :
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean | 837 | 839 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,300 | 1,311 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
| HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 411 | 413 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,606 | 1,610 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) (v : TypeVec n) (α) :
TypeVec.casesCons n f (v ::: α) = f α v :=
rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₃ {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec 0, v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(f : β Fin2.elim0 Fin2.elim0 nilFun) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := fun v v' fs => by
refine cast ?_ f
have eq₁ : v = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₂ : v' = Fin2.elim0 := by funext i; contradiction
have eq₃ : fs = nilFun := by funext i; contradiction
cases eq₁; cases eq₂; cases eq₃; rfl
/-- cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₃ (n : ℕ) {β : ∀ v v' : TypeVec (n + 1), v ⟹ v' → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (t t') (f : t → t') (v v' : TypeVec n) (fs : v ⟹ v'),
β (v ::: t) (v' ::: t') (fs ::: f)) :
∀ v v' fs, β v v' fs := by
intro v v'
rw [← append1_drop_last v, ← append1_drop_last v']
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of 0-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesNil₂ {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) : ∀ f, β f := by
intro g
suffices g = nilFun by rwa [this]
ext ⟨⟩
/-- specialized cases distinction for an arrow in the category of (n+1)-length type vectors -/
def typevecCasesCons₂ (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f)) : ∀ fs, β fs := by
intro fs
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun fs]
apply F
theorem typevecCasesNil₂_appendFun {β : Fin2.elim0 ⟹ Fin2.elim0 → Sort*} (f : β nilFun) :
typevecCasesNil₂ f nilFun = f :=
rfl
theorem typevecCasesCons₂_appendFun (n : ℕ) (t t' : Type*) (v v' : TypeVec n)
{β : (v ::: t) ⟹ (v' ::: t') → Sort*}
(F : ∀ (f : t → t') (fs : v ⟹ v'), β (fs ::: f))
(f fs) :
typevecCasesCons₂ n t t' v v' F (fs ::: f) = F f fs :=
rfl
-- for lifting predicates and relations
/-- `PredLast α p x` predicates `p` of the last element of `x : α.append1 β`. -/
def PredLast (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) : ∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => fun _ => True
| Fin2.fz => p
/-- `RelLast α r x y` says that `p` the last elements of `x y : α.append1 β` are related by `r` and
all the other elements are equal. -/
def RelLast (α : TypeVec n) {β γ : Type u} (r : β → γ → Prop) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, (α.append1 β) i → (α.append1 γ) i → Prop
| Fin2.fs _ => Eq
| Fin2.fz => r
section Liftp'
open Nat
/-- `repeat n t` is a `n-length` type vector that contains `n` occurrences of `t` -/
def «repeat» : ∀ (n : ℕ), Sort _ → TypeVec n
| 0, _ => Fin2.elim0
| Nat.succ i, t => append1 («repeat» i t) t
/-- `prod α β` is the pointwise product of the components of `α` and `β` -/
def prod : ∀ {n}, TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec.{u} n → TypeVec n
| 0, _, _ => Fin2.elim0
| n + 1, α, β => (@prod n (drop α) (drop β)) ::: (last α × last β)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗ " => TypeVec.prod
/-- `const x α` is an arrow that ignores its source and constructs a `TypeVec` that
contains nothing but `x` -/
protected def const {β} (x : β) : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), α ⟹ «repeat» _ β
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _ => TypeVec.const x (drop α) _
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz => fun _ => x
open Function (uncurry)
/-- vector of equality on a product of vectors -/
def repeatEq : ∀ {n} (α : TypeVec n), (α ⊗ α) ⟹ «repeat» _ Prop
| 0, _ => nilFun
| succ _, α => repeatEq (drop α) ::: uncurry Eq
theorem const_append1 {β γ} (x : γ) {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
TypeVec.const x (α ::: β) = appendFun (TypeVec.const x α) fun _ => x := by
ext i : 1; cases i <;> rfl
theorem eq_nilFun {α β : TypeVec 0} (f : α ⟹ β) : f = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem id_eq_nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} : @id _ α = nilFun := by
ext x; cases x
theorem const_nil {β} (x : β) (α : TypeVec 0) : TypeVec.const x α = nilFun := by
ext i : 1; cases i
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_append1 {β} {n} (α : TypeVec n) :
repeatEq (α ::: β) = splitFun (α := (α ⊗ α) ::: _)
(α' := («repeat» n Prop) ::: _) (repeatEq α) (uncurry Eq) := by
induction n <;> rfl
@[typevec]
theorem repeat_eq_nil (α : TypeVec 0) : repeatEq α = nilFun := by ext i; cases i
/-- predicate on a type vector to constrain only the last object -/
def PredLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (TypeVec.const True α) p
/-- predicate on the product of two type vectors to constrain only their last object -/
def RelLast' (α : TypeVec n) {β : Type*} (p : β → β → Prop) :
(α ::: β) ⊗ (α ::: β) ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop :=
splitFun (repeatEq α) (uncurry p)
/-- given `F : TypeVec.{u} (n+1) → Type u`, `curry F : Type u → TypeVec.{u} → Type u`,
i.e. its first argument can be fed in separately from the rest of the vector of arguments -/
def Curry (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n) : Type _ :=
F (β ::: α)
instance Curry.inhabited (F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type*) (α : Type u) (β : TypeVec.{u} n)
[I : Inhabited (F <| (β ::: α))] : Inhabited (Curry F α β) :=
I
/-- arrow to remove one element of a `repeat` vector -/
def dropRepeat (α : Type*) : ∀ {n}, drop («repeat» (succ n) α) ⟹ «repeat» n α
| succ _, Fin2.fs i => dropRepeat α i
| succ _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
/-- projection for a repeat vector -/
def ofRepeat {α : Sort _} : ∀ {n i}, «repeat» n α i → α
| _, Fin2.fz => fun (a : α) => a
| _, Fin2.fs i => @ofRepeat _ _ i
theorem const_iff_true {α : TypeVec n} {i x p} : ofRepeat (TypeVec.const p α i x) ↔ p := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
rw [TypeVec.const]
exact ih
section
variable {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}
variable (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop)
/-- left projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.fst : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ α
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.fst _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.fst
/-- right projection of a `prod` vector -/
def prod.snd : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⊗ β ⟹ β
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => @prod.snd _ (drop α) (drop β) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.snd
/-- introduce a product where both components are the same -/
def prod.diag : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ α ⊗ α
| succ _, α, Fin2.fs _, x => @prod.diag _ (drop α) _ x
| succ _, _, Fin2.fz, x => (x, x)
/-- constructor for `prod` -/
def prod.mk : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n} (i : Fin2 n), α i → β i → (α ⊗ β) i
| succ _, α, β, Fin2.fs i => mk (α := fun i => α i.fs) (β := fun i => β i.fs) i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Prod.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem prod_fst_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.fst i (prod.mk i a b) = a := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all only [prod.fst, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem prod_snd_mk {α β : TypeVec n} (i : Fin2 n) (a : α i) (b : β i) :
TypeVec.prod.snd i (prod.mk i a b) = b := by
induction i with
| fz => simp_all [prod.snd, prod.mk]
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
/-- `prod` is functorial -/
protected def prod.map : ∀ {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n}, α ⟹ β → α' ⟹ β' → α ⊗ α' ⟹ β ⊗ β'
| succ _, α, α', β, β', x, y, Fin2.fs _, a =>
@prod.map _ (drop α) (drop α') (drop β) (drop β') (dropFun x) (dropFun y) _ a
| succ _, _, _, _, _, x, y, Fin2.fz, a => (x _ a.1, y _ a.2)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:45 " ⊗' " => TypeVec.prod.map
theorem fst_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = f ⊚ TypeVec.prod.fst := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_prod_mk {α α' β β' : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : α' ⟹ β') :
TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (f ⊗' g) = g ⊚ TypeVec.prod.snd := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem fst_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.fst ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem snd_diag {α : TypeVec n} : TypeVec.prod.snd ⊚ (prod.diag : α ⟹ _) = id := by
funext i; induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem repeatEq_iff_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i x y} :
ofRepeat (repeatEq α i (prod.mk _ x y)) ↔ x = y := by
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ i_ih =>
rw [repeatEq]
exact i_ih
/-- given a predicate vector `p` over vector `α`, `Subtype_ p` is the type of vectors
that contain an `α` that satisfies `p` -/
def Subtype_ : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n}, (α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) → TypeVec n
| _, _, p, Fin2.fz => Subtype fun x => p Fin2.fz x
| _, _, p, Fin2.fs i => Subtype_ (dropFun p) i
/-- projection on `Subtype_` -/
def subtypeVal : ∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop), Subtype_ p ⟹ α
| succ n, _, _, Fin2.fs i => @subtypeVal n _ _ i
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz => Subtype.val
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a subtype of vector into
a vector of subtypes -/
def toSubtype :
∀ {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop),
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| succ _, _, p, Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype (dropFun p) i x
| succ _, _, _, Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- arrow that rearranges the type of `Subtype_` to turn a vector of subtypes
into a subtype of vector -/
def ofSubtype {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat <| p i x }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => x
/-- similar to `toSubtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def toSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
(fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }) ⟹ Subtype_ p
| Fin2.fs i, x => toSubtype' (dropFun p) i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `of_subtype` adapted to relations (i.e. predicate on product) -/
def ofSubtype' {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} (p : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
Subtype_ p ⟹ fun i : Fin2 n => { x : α i × α i // ofRepeat <| p i (prod.mk _ x.1 x.2) }
| Fin2.fs i, x => ofSubtype' _ i x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨x.val, cast (by congr) x.property⟩
/-- similar to `diag` but the target vector is a `Subtype_`
guaranteeing the equality of the components -/
def diagSub {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : α ⟹ Subtype_ (repeatEq α)
| Fin2.fs _, x => @diagSub _ (drop α) _ x
| Fin2.fz, x => ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩
theorem subtypeVal_nil {α : TypeVec.{u} 0} (ps : α ⟹ «repeat» 0 Prop) :
TypeVec.subtypeVal ps = nilFun :=
funext <| by rintro ⟨⟩
theorem diag_sub_val {n} {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp only [comp, subtypeVal, repeatEq.eq_2, diagSub, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih => apply @i_ih (drop α)
theorem prod_id : ∀ {n} {α β : TypeVec.{u} n}, (id ⊗' id) = (id : α ⊗ β ⟹ _) := by
intros
ext i a
induction i with
| fz => cases a; rfl
| fs _ i_ih => apply i_ih
theorem append_prod_appendFun {n} {α α' β β' : TypeVec.{u} n} {φ φ' ψ ψ' : Type u}
{f₀ : α ⟹ α'} {g₀ : β ⟹ β'} {f₁ : φ → φ'} {g₁ : ψ → ψ'} :
((f₀ ⊗' g₀) ::: (_root_.Prod.map f₁ g₁)) = ((f₀ ::: f₁) ⊗' (g₀ ::: g₁)) := by
ext i a
cases i
· cases a
rfl
· rfl
end Liftp'
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_diag {α} : dropFun (@prod.diag (n + 1) α) = prod.diag := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (subtypeVal p) = subtypeVal _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_subtypeVal {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (subtypeVal p) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (toSubtype p) = toSubtype _ := by
ext i
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_toSubtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (toSubtype p) = _root_.id := by
ext i : 2
induction i; simp [dropFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
dropFun (ofSubtype p) = ofSubtype _ := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_of_subtype {α} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» (n + 1) Prop) :
lastFun (ofSubtype p) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_RelLast' {α : TypeVec n} {β} (R : β → β → Prop) :
dropFun (RelLast' α R) = repeatEq α :=
rfl
attribute [simp] drop_append1'
open MvFunctor
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
dropFun (f ⊗' f') = (dropFun f ⊗' dropFun f') := by
ext i : 2
induction i <;> simp [dropFun, *] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_prod {α α' β β' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) (f' : α' ⟹ β') :
lastFun (f ⊗' f') = Prod.map (lastFun f) (lastFun f') := by
ext i : 1
induction i; simp [lastFun, *]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
dropFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_from_append1_drop_last {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} :
lastFun (@fromAppend1DropLast _ α) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_id {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : dropFun (@TypeVec.id _ α) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_id {α β : TypeVec n} : (@TypeVec.id _ α ⊗' @TypeVec.id _ β) = id := by
ext i x : 2
induction i <;> simp only [TypeVec.prod.map, *, dropFun_id]
cases x
· rfl
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeVal_diagSub {α : TypeVec n} : subtypeVal (repeatEq α) ⊚ diagSub = prod.diag := by
ext i x
induction i with
| fz => simp [comp, diagSub, subtypeVal, prod.diag]
| fs _ i_ih =>
simp only [comp, subtypeVal, diagSub, prod.diag] at *
apply i_ih
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype_of_subtype {α : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
toSubtype p ⊚ ofSubtype p = id := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [id, toSubtype, comp, ofSubtype] at *
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem subtypeVal_toSubtype {α : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
subtypeVal p ⊚ toSubtype p = fun _ => Subtype.val := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [toSubtype, comp, subtypeVal] at *
simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype_of_subtype_assoc
{α β : TypeVec n} (p : α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (f : β ⟹ Subtype_ p) :
@toSubtype n _ p ⊚ ofSubtype _ ⊚ f = f := by
rw [← comp_assoc, toSubtype_of_subtype]; simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype'_of_subtype' {α : TypeVec n} (r : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
toSubtype' r ⊚ ofSubtype' r = id := by
ext i x
induction i
<;> dsimp only [id, toSubtype', comp, ofSubtype'] at *
<;> simp [Subtype.eta, *]
theorem subtypeVal_toSubtype' {α : TypeVec n} (r : α ⊗ α ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) :
subtypeVal r ⊚ toSubtype' r = fun i x => prod.mk i x.1.fst x.1.snd := by
ext i x
induction i <;> simp only [id, toSubtype', comp, subtypeVal, prod.mk] at *
simp [*]
end TypeVec
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 713 | 716 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
| /-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 270 | 272 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OrzechProperty
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Pi
/-!
# Invariant basis number property
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a (not necessary commutative) ring.
- `InvariantBasisNumber R` is a type class stating that `(Fin n → R) ≃ₗ[R] (Fin m → R)`
implies `n = m`, a property known as the *invariant basis number property.*
This assumption implies that there is a well-defined notion of the rank
of a finitely generated free (left) `R`-module.
It is also useful to consider the following stronger conditions:
- The *rank condition*, witnessed by the type class `RankCondition R`, states that
the existence of a surjective linear map `(Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin m → R)` implies `m ≤ n`.
- The *strong rank condition*, witnessed by the type class `StrongRankCondition R`, states
that the existence of an injective linear map `(Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin m → R)`
implies `n ≤ m`.
- `OrzechProperty R`, defined in `Mathlib/RingTheory/OrzechProperty.lean`,
states that for any finitely generated `R`-module `M`, any surjective homomorphism `f : N → M`
from a submodule `N` of `M` to `M` is injective.
## Instances
- `IsNoetherianRing.orzechProperty` (defined in `Mathlib/RingTheory/Noetherian.lean`) :
any left-noetherian ring satisfies the Orzech property.
This applies in particular to division rings.
- `strongRankCondition_of_orzechProperty` : the Orzech property implies the strong rank condition
(for non trivial rings).
- `IsNoetherianRing.strongRankCondition` : every nontrivial left-noetherian ring satisfies the
strong rank condition (and so in particular every division ring or field).
- `rankCondition_of_strongRankCondition` : the strong rank condition implies the rank condition.
- `invariantBasisNumber_of_rankCondition` : the rank condition implies the
invariant basis number property.
- `invariantBasisNumber_of_nontrivial_of_commRing`: a nontrivial commutative ring satisfies
the invariant basis number property.
More generally, every commutative ring satisfies the Orzech property,
hence the strong rank condition, which is proved in `Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean`.
We keep `invariantBasisNumber_of_nontrivial_of_commRing` here since it imports fewer files.
## Counterexamples to converse results
The following examples can be found in the book of Lam [lam_1999]
(see also <https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4711904>):
- Let `k` be a field, then the free (non-commutative) algebra `k⟨x, y⟩` satisfies
the rank condition but not the strong rank condition.
- The free (non-commutative) algebra `ℚ⟨a, b, c, d⟩` quotient by the
two-sided ideal `(ac − 1, bd − 1, ab, cd)` satisfies the invariant basis number property
but not the rank condition.
## Future work
So far, there is no API at all for the `InvariantBasisNumber` class. There are several natural
ways to formulate that a module `M` is finitely generated and free, for example
`M ≃ₗ[R] (Fin n → R)`, `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι → R)`, where `ι` is a fintype, or providing a basis indexed by
a finite type. There should be lemmas applying the invariant basis number property to each
situation.
The finite version of the invariant basis number property implies the infinite analogue, i.e., that
`(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] (ι' →₀ R)` implies that `Cardinal.mk ι = Cardinal.mk ι'`. This fact (and its
variants) should be formalized.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariant_basis_number
* https://mathoverflow.net/a/2574/
* [Lam, T. Y. *Lectures on Modules and Rings*][lam_1999]
* [Orzech, Morris. *Onto endomorphisms are isomorphisms*][orzech1971]
* [Djoković, D. Ž. *Epimorphisms of modules which must be isomorphisms*][djokovic1973]
* [Ribenboim, Paulo.
*Épimorphismes de modules qui sont nécessairement des isomorphismes*][ribenboim1971]
## Tags
free module, rank, Orzech property, (strong) rank condition, invariant basis number, IBN
-/
noncomputable section
open Function
universe u v w
section
variable (R : Type u) [Semiring R]
/-- We say that `R` satisfies the strong rank condition if `(Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin m → R)` injective
implies `n ≤ m`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class StrongRankCondition : Prop where
/-- Any injective linear map from `Rⁿ` to `Rᵐ` guarantees `n ≤ m`. -/
le_of_fin_injective : ∀ {n m : ℕ} (f : (Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] Fin m → R), Injective f → n ≤ m
theorem le_of_fin_injective [StrongRankCondition R] {n m : ℕ} (f : (Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] Fin m → R) :
Injective f → n ≤ m :=
StrongRankCondition.le_of_fin_injective f
/-- A ring satisfies the strong rank condition if and only if, for all `n : ℕ`, any linear map
`(Fin (n + 1) → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin n → R)` is not injective. -/
theorem strongRankCondition_iff_succ :
StrongRankCondition R ↔
∀ (n : ℕ) (f : (Fin (n + 1) → R) →ₗ[R] Fin n → R), ¬Function.Injective f := by
| refine ⟨fun h n => fun f hf => ?_, fun h => ⟨@fun n m f hf => ?_⟩⟩
· letI : StrongRankCondition R := h
exact Nat.not_succ_le_self n (le_of_fin_injective R f hf)
· by_contra H
exact
h m (f.comp (Function.ExtendByZero.linearMap R (Fin.castLE (not_le.1 H))))
(hf.comp (Function.extend_injective (Fin.strictMono_castLE _).injective _))
/-- Any nontrivial ring satisfying Orzech property also satisfies strong rank condition. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongRankCondition_of_orzechProperty
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/InvariantBasisNumber.lean | 130 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
/-!
# Sorting tuples by their values
Given an `n`-tuple `f : Fin n → α` where `α` is ordered,
we may want to turn it into a sorted `n`-tuple.
This file provides an API for doing so, with the sorted `n`-tuple given by
`f ∘ Tuple.sort f`.
## Main declarations
* `Tuple.sort`: given `f : Fin n → α`, produces a permutation on `Fin n`
* `Tuple.monotone_sort`: `f ∘ Tuple.sort f` is `Monotone`
-/
namespace Tuple
variable {n : ℕ}
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α]
/-- `graph f` produces the finset of pairs `(f i, i)`
equipped with the lexicographic order.
-/
def graph (f : Fin n → α) : Finset (α ×ₗ Fin n) :=
Finset.univ.image fun i => (f i, i)
/-- Given `p : α ×ₗ (Fin n) := (f i, i)` with `p ∈ graph f`,
`graph.proj p` is defined to be `f i`.
-/
def graph.proj {f : Fin n → α} : graph f → α := fun p => p.1.1
@[simp]
theorem graph.card (f : Fin n → α) : (graph f).card = n := by
rw [graph, Finset.card_image_of_injective]
· exact Finset.card_fin _
· intro _ _
-- Porting note: proof was `simp`
rw [Prod.ext_iff]
simp
/-- `graphEquiv₁ f` is the natural equivalence between `Fin n` and `graph f`,
mapping `i` to `(f i, i)`. -/
def graphEquiv₁ (f : Fin n → α) : Fin n ≃ graph f where
toFun i := ⟨(f i, i), by simp [graph]⟩
invFun p := p.1.2
left_inv i := by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, i⟩, h⟩ => by
-- Porting note: was `simpa [graph] using h`
simp only [graph, Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_univ, true_and] at h
obtain ⟨i', hi'⟩ := h
obtain ⟨-, rfl⟩ := Prod.mk_inj.mp hi'
simpa
@[simp]
theorem proj_equiv₁' (f : Fin n → α) : graph.proj ∘ graphEquiv₁ f = f :=
rfl
/-- `graphEquiv₂ f` is an equivalence between `Fin n` and `graph f` that respects the order.
-/
def graphEquiv₂ (f : Fin n → α) : Fin n ≃o graph f :=
Finset.orderIsoOfFin _ (by simp)
/-- `sort f` is the permutation that orders `Fin n` according to the order of the outputs of `f`. -/
def sort (f : Fin n → α) : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) :=
(graphEquiv₂ f).toEquiv.trans (graphEquiv₁ f).symm
theorem graphEquiv₂_apply (f : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
graphEquiv₂ f i = graphEquiv₁ f (sort f i) :=
((graphEquiv₁ f).apply_symm_apply _).symm
theorem self_comp_sort (f : Fin n → α) : f ∘ sort f = graph.proj ∘ graphEquiv₂ f :=
show graph.proj ∘ (graphEquiv₁ f ∘ (graphEquiv₁ f).symm) ∘ (graphEquiv₂ f).toEquiv = _ by simp
theorem monotone_proj (f : Fin n → α) : Monotone (graph.proj : graph f → α) := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, i⟩, hx⟩ ⟨⟨y, j⟩, hy⟩ (_ | h)
· exact le_of_lt ‹_›
· simp [graph.proj]
theorem monotone_sort (f : Fin n → α) : Monotone (f ∘ sort f) := by
rw [self_comp_sort]
exact (monotone_proj f).comp (graphEquiv₂ f).monotone
end Tuple
namespace Tuple
open List
variable {n : ℕ} {α : Type*}
/-- If `f₀ ≤ f₁ ≤ f₂ ≤ ⋯` is a sorted `m`-tuple of elements of `α`, then for any `j : Fin m` and
`a : α` we have `j < #{i | fᵢ ≤ a}` iff `fⱼ ≤ a`. -/
theorem lt_card_le_iff_apply_le_of_monotone [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α]
{m : ℕ} (f : Fin m → α) (a : α) (h_sorted : Monotone f) (j : Fin m) :
j < Fintype.card {i // f i ≤ a} ↔ f j ≤ a := by
suffices h1 : ∀ k : Fin m, (k < Fintype.card {i // f i ≤ a}) → f k ≤ a by
refine ⟨h1 j, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
by_contra! hc
let p : Fin m → Prop := fun x ↦ f x ≤ a
let q : Fin m → Prop := fun x ↦ x < Fintype.card {i // f i ≤ a}
let q' : {i // f i ≤ a} → Prop := fun x ↦ q x
have hw : 0 < Fintype.card {j : {x : Fin m // f x ≤ a} // ¬ q' j} :=
Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨⟨j, h⟩, not_lt.2 hc⟩⟩
apply hw.ne'
have he := Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.sumCompl <| q'
have h4 := (Fintype.card_congr (@Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype _ p q (h1 _)))
have h_le : Fintype.card { i // f i ≤ a } ≤ m := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Fintype.card_fin m]
exact Fintype.card_subtype_le _
rwa [Fintype.card_sum, h4, Fintype.card_fin_lt_of_le h_le, add_eq_left] at he
intro _ h
contrapose! h
rw [← Fin.card_Iio, Fintype.card_subtype]
refine Finset.card_mono (fun i => Function.mtr ?_)
simp_rw [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Finset.mem_Iio]
intro hij hia
apply h
exact (h_sorted (le_of_not_lt hij)).trans hia
theorem lt_card_ge_iff_apply_ge_of_antitone [Preorder α] [DecidableLE α]
{m : ℕ} (f : Fin m → α) (a : α) (h_sorted : Antitone f) (j : Fin m) :
j < Fintype.card {i // a ≤ f i} ↔ a ≤ f j :=
lt_card_le_iff_apply_le_of_monotone _ (OrderDual.toDual a) h_sorted.dual_right j
/-- If two permutations of a tuple `f` are both monotone, then they are equal. -/
theorem unique_monotone [PartialOrder α] {f : Fin n → α} {σ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)}
(hfσ : Monotone (f ∘ σ)) (hfτ : Monotone (f ∘ τ)) : f ∘ σ = f ∘ τ :=
ofFn_injective <|
eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((σ.ofFn_comp_perm f).trans (τ.ofFn_comp_perm f).symm)
hfσ.ofFn_sorted hfτ.ofFn_sorted
/-- If two permutations of a tuple `f` are both antitone, then they are equal. -/
theorem unique_antitone [PartialOrder α] {f : Fin n → α} {σ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)}
(hfσ : Antitone (f ∘ σ)) (hfτ : Antitone (f ∘ τ)) : f ∘ σ = f ∘ τ :=
ofFn_injective <|
eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((σ.ofFn_comp_perm f).trans (τ.ofFn_comp_perm f).symm)
hfσ.ofFn_sorted hfτ.ofFn_sorted
variable [LinearOrder α] {f : Fin n → α} {σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)}
/-- A permutation `σ` equals `sort f` if and only if the map `i ↦ (f (σ i), σ i)` is
strictly monotone (w.r.t. the lexicographic ordering on the target). -/
theorem eq_sort_iff' : σ = sort f ↔ StrictMono (σ.trans <| graphEquiv₁ f) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h, sort, Equiv.trans_assoc, Equiv.symm_trans_self]
exact (graphEquiv₂ f).strictMono
· have := Subsingleton.elim (graphEquiv₂ f) (h.orderIsoOfSurjective _ <| Equiv.surjective _)
ext1 x
exact (graphEquiv₁ f).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.1 (DFunLike.congr_fun this x).symm
/-- A permutation `σ` equals `sort f` if and only if `f ∘ σ` is monotone and whenever `i < j`
and `f (σ i) = f (σ j)`, then `σ i < σ j`. This means that `sort f` is the lexicographically
smallest permutation `σ` such that `f ∘ σ` is monotone. -/
theorem eq_sort_iff :
σ = sort f ↔ Monotone (f ∘ σ) ∧ ∀ i j, i < j → f (σ i) = f (σ j) → σ i < σ j := by
rw [eq_sort_iff']
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨(monotone_proj f).comp h.monotone, fun i j hij hfij => ?_⟩, fun h i j hij => ?_⟩
· exact ((Prod.Lex.toLex_lt_toLex.1 <| h hij).resolve_left hfij.not_lt).2
· obtain he | hl := (h.1 hij.le).eq_or_lt <;> apply Prod.Lex.toLex_lt_toLex.2
exacts [Or.inr ⟨he, h.2 i j hij he⟩, Or.inl hl]
/-- The permutation that sorts `f` is the identity if and only if `f` is monotone. -/
| theorem sort_eq_refl_iff_monotone : sort f = Equiv.refl _ ↔ Monotone f := by
rw [eq_comm, eq_sort_iff, Equiv.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
simp only [id, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ _ _ hij _ => hij
/-- A permutation of a tuple `f` is `f` sorted if and only if it is monotone. -/
theorem comp_sort_eq_comp_iff_monotone : f ∘ σ = f ∘ sort f ↔ Monotone (f ∘ σ) :=
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Sort.lean | 176 | 182 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 3,353 | 3,355 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Invertible
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Basic
import Qq.MetaM
/-!
## The `Result` type for `norm_num`
We set up predicates `IsNat`, `IsInt`, and `IsRat`,
stating that an element of a ring is equal to the "normal form" of a natural number, integer,
or rational number coerced into that ring.
We then define `Result e`, which contains a proof that a typed expression `e : Q($α)`
is equal to the coercion of an explicit natural number, integer, or rational number,
or is either `true` or `false`.
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Lean
open Lean.Meta Qq Lean.Elab Term
namespace Mathlib
namespace Meta.NormNum
variable {u : Level}
/-- A shortcut (non)instance for `AddMonoidWithOne ℕ` to shrink generated proofs. -/
def instAddMonoidWithOneNat : AddMonoidWithOne ℕ := inferInstance
/-- A shortcut (non)instance for `AddMonoidWithOne α` from `Ring α` to shrink generated proofs. -/
def instAddMonoidWithOne {α : Type u} [Ring α] : AddMonoidWithOne α := inferInstance
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `AddMonoidWithOne α` expression. -/
def inferAddMonoidWithOne (α : Q(Type u)) : MetaM Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) <|>
throwError "not an AddMonoidWithOne"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `Semiring α` expression. -/
def inferSemiring (α : Q(Type u)) : MetaM Q(Semiring $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(Semiring $α) <|> throwError "not a semiring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `Ring α` expression. -/
def inferRing (α : Q(Type u)) : MetaM Q(Ring $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(Ring $α) <|> throwError "not a ring"
/--
Represent an integer as a "raw" typed expression.
This uses `.lit (.natVal n)` internally to represent a natural number,
rather than the preferred `OfNat.ofNat` form.
We use this internally to avoid unnecessary typeclass searches.
This function is the inverse of `Expr.intLit!`.
-/
def mkRawIntLit (n : ℤ) : Q(ℤ) :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n.natAbs
if 0 ≤ n then q(.ofNat $lit) else q(.negOfNat $lit)
/--
Represent an integer as a "raw" typed expression.
This `.lit (.natVal n)` internally to represent a natural number,
rather than the preferred `OfNat.ofNat` form.
We use this internally to avoid unnecessary typeclass searches.
-/
def mkRawRatLit (q : ℚ) : Q(ℚ) :=
let nlit : Q(ℤ) := mkRawIntLit q.num
let dlit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit q.den
q(mkRat $nlit $dlit)
/-- Extract the raw natlit representing the absolute value of a raw integer literal
(of the type produced by `Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.mkRawIntLit`) along with an equality proof. -/
def rawIntLitNatAbs (n : Q(ℤ)) : (m : Q(ℕ)) × Q(Int.natAbs $n = $m) :=
if n.isAppOfArity ``Int.ofNat 1 then
have m : Q(ℕ) := n.appArg!
⟨m, show Q(Int.natAbs (Int.ofNat $m) = $m) from q(Int.natAbs_natCast $m)⟩
else if n.isAppOfArity ``Int.negOfNat 1 then
have m : Q(ℕ) := n.appArg!
⟨m, show Q(Int.natAbs (Int.negOfNat $m) = $m) from q(Int.natAbs_neg $m)⟩
else
panic! "not a raw integer literal"
/--
Constructs an `ofNat` application `a'` with the canonical instance, together with a proof that
the instance is equal to the result of `Nat.cast` on the given `AddMonoidWithOne` instance.
This function is performance-critical, as many higher level tactics have to construct numerals.
So rather than using typeclass search we hardcode the (relatively small) set of solutions
to the typeclass problem.
-/
def mkOfNat (α : Q(Type u)) (_sα : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α)) (lit : Q(ℕ)) :
MetaM ((a' : Q($α)) × Q($lit = $a')) := do
if α.isConstOf ``Nat then
let a' : Q(ℕ) := q(OfNat.ofNat $lit : ℕ)
pure ⟨a', (q(Eq.refl $a') : Expr)⟩
else if α.isConstOf ``Int then
let a' : Q(ℤ) := q(OfNat.ofNat $lit : ℤ)
pure ⟨a', (q(Eq.refl $a') : Expr)⟩
else if α.isConstOf ``Rat then
let a' : Q(ℚ) := q(OfNat.ofNat $lit : ℚ)
pure ⟨a', (q(Eq.refl $a') : Expr)⟩
else
let some n := lit.rawNatLit? | failure
match n with
| 0 => pure ⟨q(0 : $α), (q(Nat.cast_zero (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| 1 => pure ⟨q(1 : $α), (q(Nat.cast_one (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| k+2 =>
let k : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit k
let _x : Q(Nat.AtLeastTwo $lit) :=
(q(instNatAtLeastTwo (n := $k)) : Expr)
let a' : Q($α) := q(OfNat.ofNat $lit)
pure ⟨a', (q(Eq.refl $a') : Expr)⟩
/-- Assert that an element of a semiring is equal to the coercion of some natural number. -/
structure IsNat {α : Type u} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : Prop where
/-- The element is equal to the coercion of the natural number. -/
out : a = n
theorem IsNat.raw_refl (n : ℕ) : IsNat n n := ⟨rfl⟩
/--
A "raw nat cast" is an expression of the form `(Nat.rawCast lit : α)` where `lit` is a raw
natural number literal. These expressions are used by tactics like `ring` to decrease the number
of typeclass arguments required in each use of a number literal at type `α`.
-/
@[simp] def _root_.Nat.rawCast {α : Type u} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : α := n
theorem IsNat.to_eq {α : Type u} [AddMonoidWithOne α] {n} : {a a' : α} → IsNat a n → n = a' → a = a'
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem IsNat.to_raw_eq {a : α} {n : ℕ} [AddMonoidWithOne α] : IsNat (a : α) n → a = n.rawCast
| ⟨e⟩ => e
theorem IsNat.of_raw (α) [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : IsNat (n.rawCast : α) n := ⟨rfl⟩
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem isNat.natElim {p : ℕ → Prop} : {n : ℕ} → {n' : ℕ} → IsNat n n' → p n' → p n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, h => h
/-- Assert that an element of a ring is equal to the coercion of some integer. -/
structure IsInt [Ring α] (a : α) (n : ℤ) : Prop where
/-- The element is equal to the coercion of the integer. -/
out : a = n
/--
A "raw int cast" is an expression of the form:
* `(Nat.rawCast lit : α)` where `lit` is a raw natural number literal
* `(Int.rawCast (Int.negOfNat lit) : α)` where `lit` is a nonzero raw natural number literal
(That is, we only actually use this function for negative integers.) This representation is used by
tactics like `ring` to decrease the number of typeclass arguments required in each use of a number
literal at type `α`.
-/
@[simp] def _root_.Int.rawCast [Ring α] (n : ℤ) : α := n
theorem IsInt.to_isNat {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {a : α} {n}, IsInt a (.ofNat n) → IsNat a n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsNat.to_isInt {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {a : α} {n}, IsNat a n → IsInt a (.ofNat n)
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsInt.to_raw_eq {a : α} {n : ℤ} [Ring α] : IsInt (a : α) n → a = n.rawCast
| ⟨e⟩ => e
theorem IsInt.of_raw (α) [Ring α] (n : ℤ) : IsInt (n.rawCast : α) n := ⟨rfl⟩
theorem IsInt.neg_to_eq {α} [Ring α] {n} :
{a a' : α} → IsInt a (.negOfNat n) → n = a' → a = -a'
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => by simp [Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.cast_neg]
theorem IsInt.nonneg_to_eq {α} [Ring α] {n}
{a a' : α} (h : IsInt a (.ofNat n)) (e : n = a') : a = a' := h.to_isNat.to_eq e
/--
Assert that an element of a ring is equal to `num / denom`
(and `denom` is invertible so that this makes sense).
We will usually also have `num` and `denom` coprime,
although this is not part of the definition.
-/
inductive IsRat [Ring α] (a : α) (num : ℤ) (denom : ℕ) : Prop
| mk (inv : Invertible (denom : α)) (eq : a = num * ⅟(denom : α))
/--
A "raw rat cast" is an expression of the form:
* `(Nat.rawCast lit : α)` where `lit` is a raw natural number literal
* `(Int.rawCast (Int.negOfNat lit) : α)` where `lit` is a nonzero raw natural number literal
* `(Rat.rawCast n d : α)` where `n` is a raw int literal, `d` is a raw nat literal, and `d` is not
`1` or `0`.
(where a raw int literal is of the form `Int.ofNat lit` or `Int.negOfNat nzlit` where `lit` is a raw
nat literal)
This representation is used by tactics like `ring` to decrease the number of typeclass arguments
required in each use of a number literal at type `α`.
-/
@[simp]
def _root_.Rat.rawCast [DivisionRing α] (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : α := n / d
theorem IsRat.to_isNat {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {a : α} {n}, IsRat a (.ofNat n) (nat_lit 1) → IsNat a n
| _, _, ⟨inv, rfl⟩ => have := @invertibleOne α _; ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsNat.to_isRat {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {a : α} {n}, IsNat a n → IsRat a (.ofNat n) (nat_lit 1)
| | _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨1, by simp, by simp⟩, by simp⟩
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Result.lean | 215 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties.Basic
/-!
# The meta properties of surjective ring homomorphisms.
## Main results
Let `R` be a commutative ring, `M` be a submonoid of `R`.
* `surjective_localizationPreserves` : `M⁻¹R →+* M⁻¹S` is surjective if `R →+* S` is surjective.
* `surjective_ofLocalizationSpan` : `R →+* S` is surjective if there exists a set `{ r }` that
spans `R` such that `Rᵣ →+* Sᵣ` is surjective.
* `surjective_localRingHom_of_surjective` : A surjective ring homomorphism `R →+* S` induces a
surjective homomorphism `R_{f⁻¹(P)} →+* S_P` for every prime ideal `P` of `S`.
-/
namespace RingHom
|
open scoped TensorProduct
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RingHom/Surjective.lean | 26 | 27 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function -/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ` -/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element -/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ a` is the least element greater than `a` -/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function -/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred` -/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element -/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred b` is the greatest element less than `b` -/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h }
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
variable (α)
open Classical in
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun _ ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.succ_le := succ_le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMax.of_succ_le, _root_.IsMax.succ_le⟩ := succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
theorem lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (hab : b ≤ a) (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a :=
hab.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (succ_le_of_lt h) hb
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h]
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
/-- See also `Order.succ_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma le_succ_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax hab.lt.not_isMax) <| hab.lt.succ_le.lt_of_not_le hba
· exact hba.trans (le_succ _)
alias _root_.WCovBy.le_succ := le_succ_of_wcovBy
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x :=
id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_succ _ _
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
rw [← iterate_succ_apply' succ]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) :=
fun _ => (lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · ha)
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb h
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_of_le : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · <| not_isMax b)
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[gcongr] theorem succ_lt_succ (hab : a < b) : succ a < succ b := by simp [hab]
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ (a : α) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) :=
Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) :=
Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
lemma le_iff_eq_or_succ_le : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ succ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· simpa [ha.succ_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a =>
h.2.antisymm (succ_le_of_lt <| h.1.lt_of_ne <| hba.symm),
?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, le_succ b⟩
· exact ⟨le_succ a, le_rfl⟩
/-- See also `Order.le_succ_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma succ_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : succ a = b := (succ_le_of_lt h.lt).antisymm h.wcovBy.le_succ
alias _root_.CovBy.succ_eq := succ_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_succ [PartialOrder β] [SuccOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (succ a) = succ (f a) := by
by_cases h : IsMax a
· rw [h.succ_eq, (f.isMax_apply.2 h).succ_eq]
· exact (f.map_covBy.2 <| covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h).succ_eq.symm
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem succ_eq_iff_covBy : succ a = b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact covBy_succ _, CovBy.succ_eq⟩
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem succ_top : succ (⊤ : α) = ⊤ := by
rw [succ_eq_iff_isMax, isMax_iff_eq_top]
theorem succ_le_iff_eq_top : succ a ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
succ_le_iff_isMax.trans isMax_iff_eq_top
theorem lt_succ_iff_ne_top : a < succ a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ :=
lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.trans not_isMax_iff_ne_top
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem bot_lt_succ (a : α) : ⊥ < succ a :=
(lt_succ_of_not_isMax not_isMax_bot).trans_le <| succ_mono bot_le
theorem succ_ne_bot (a : α) : succ a ≠ ⊥ :=
(bot_lt_succ a).ne'
end OrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem le_of_lt_succ {a b : α} : a < succ b → a ≤ b := fun h ↦ by
by_contra! nh
exact (h.trans_le (succ_le_of_lt nh)).false
theorem lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_lt_succ, fun h => h.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha⟩
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha]
theorem succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb]
theorem Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Set.ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ici_inter_Iic]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) (hb : ¬IsMax b) :
succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, succ_le_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb,
succ_lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax ha hb]
theorem le_succ_iff_eq_or_le : a ≤ succ b ↔ a = succ b ∨ a ≤ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· rw [hb.succ_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp le_of_eq]
· rw [← lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
(lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax hb).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem not_isMin_succ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : ¬ IsMin (succ a) := by
obtain ha | ha := (le_succ a).eq_or_lt
· exact (ha ▸ succ_eq_iff_isMax.1 ha.symm).not_isMin
· exact not_isMin_of_lt ha
theorem Iic_succ (a : α) : Iic (succ a) = insert (succ a) (Iic a) :=
ext fun _ => le_succ_iff_eq_or_le
theorem Icc_succ_right (h : a ≤ succ b) : Icc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Icc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h)]
theorem Ioc_succ_right (h : a < succ b) : Ioc a (succ b) = insert (succ b) (Ioc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_succ, inter_insert_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h)]
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
ext fun _ => lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMax h
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ici, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ici.2 h₁)]
theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : ¬IsMax b) :
Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) := by
simp_rw [← Iio_inter_Ioi, Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h₂, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Ioi.2 h₁)]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
lt_succ_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax b
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := by simp
alias ⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, _⟩ := succ_le_succ_iff
alias ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, _⟩ := succ_lt_succ_iff
-- TODO: prove for a succ-archimedean non-linear order with bottom
@[simp]
theorem Iio_succ (a : α) : Iio (succ a) = Iic a :=
Iio_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Ico a (succ b) = Icc a b :=
Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
-- TODO: prove for a succ-archimedean non-linear order
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioo a (succ b) = Ioc a b :=
Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_succ_iff : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b :=
succ_eq_succ_iff_of_not_isMax (not_isMax a) (not_isMax b)
theorem succ_injective : Injective (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_eq_succ_iff.1
theorem succ_ne_succ_iff : succ a ≠ succ b ↔ a ≠ b :=
succ_injective.ne_iff
alias ⟨_, succ_ne_succ⟩ := succ_ne_succ_iff
theorem lt_succ_iff_eq_or_lt : a < succ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
lt_succ_iff.trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem Iio_succ_eq_insert (a : α) : Iio (succ a) = insert a (Iio a) :=
Iio_succ_eq_insert_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Ico_succ_right_eq_insert (h : a ≤ b) : Ico a (succ b) = insert b (Ico a b) :=
Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h <| not_isMax b
theorem Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert (h : a < b) : Ioo a (succ b) = insert b (Ioo a b) :=
Ioo_succ_right_eq_insert_of_not_isMax h <| not_isMax b
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff_le_succ : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ b ≤ succ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· contrapose! h
exact ⟨succ a, lt_succ_iff_not_isMax.mpr (not_isMax a), h⟩
· ext x
suffices a < x → b ≤ x by simpa
exact fun hx ↦ le_of_lt_succ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| succ_strictMono hx
end NoMaxOrder
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem lt_succ_bot_iff [NoMaxOrder α] : a < succ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [lt_succ_iff, le_bot_iff]
theorem le_succ_bot_iff : a ≤ succ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ ∨ a = succ ⊥ := by
rw [le_succ_iff_eq_or_le, le_bot_iff, or_comm]
end OrderBot
end LinearOrder
/-- There is at most one way to define the successors in a `PartialOrder`. -/
instance [PartialOrder α] : Subsingleton (SuccOrder α) :=
⟨by
intro h₀ h₁
ext a
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· exact (@IsMax.succ_eq _ _ h₀ _ ha).trans ha.succ_eq.symm
· exact @CovBy.succ_eq _ _ h₀ _ _ (covBy_succ_of_not_isMax ha)⟩
theorem succ_eq_sInf [CompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] (a : α) :
succ a = sInf (Set.Ioi a) := by
apply (le_sInf fun b => succ_le_of_lt).antisymm
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· rw [succ_top]
exact le_top
· exact sInf_le (lt_succ_iff_ne_top.2 ha)
theorem succ_eq_iInf [CompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : succ a = ⨅ b > a, b := by
rw [succ_eq_sInf, iInf_subtype', iInf, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Ioi]
theorem succ_eq_csInf [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [SuccOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
succ a = sInf (Set.Ioi a) := by
apply (le_csInf nonempty_Ioi fun b => succ_le_of_lt).antisymm
exact csInf_le ⟨a, fun b => le_of_lt⟩ <| lt_succ a
/-! ### Predecessor order -/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The predecessor of an element. If `a` is not minimal, then `pred a` is the greatest element less
than `a`. If `a` is minimal, then `pred a = a`. -/
def pred : α → α :=
PredOrder.pred
theorem pred_le : ∀ a : α, pred a ≤ a :=
PredOrder.pred_le
theorem min_of_le_pred {a : α} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a :=
PredOrder.min_of_le_pred
theorem le_pred_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → a ≤ pred b :=
PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.le_pred := le_pred_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem le_pred_iff_isMin : a ≤ pred a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨min_of_le_pred, fun h => h <| pred_le _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMin.of_le_pred, _root_.IsMin.le_pred⟩ := le_pred_iff_isMin
@[simp]
theorem pred_lt_iff_not_isMin : pred a < a ↔ ¬IsMin a :=
⟨not_isMin_of_lt, fun ha => (pred_le a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| min_of_le_pred h⟩
alias ⟨_, pred_lt_of_not_isMin⟩ := pred_lt_iff_not_isMin
theorem pred_wcovBy (a : α) : pred a ⩿ a :=
⟨pred_le a, fun _ hb nh => (le_pred_of_lt nh).not_lt hb⟩
theorem pred_covBy_of_not_isMin (h : ¬IsMin a) : pred a ⋖ a :=
(pred_wcovBy a).covBy_of_lt <| pred_lt_of_not_isMin h
theorem pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le (ha : ¬IsMin a) : a ≤ b → pred a < b :=
(pred_lt_of_not_isMin ha).trans_le
theorem le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_lt <| pred_lt_of_not_isMin ha, le_pred_of_lt⟩
lemma pred_lt_pred_of_not_isMin (h : a < b) (ha : ¬ IsMin a) : pred a < pred b :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha <| le_pred_of_lt h
theorem pred_le_pred_of_not_isMin_of_le (ha : ¬IsMin a) (hb : ¬IsMin b) :
a ≤ b → pred a ≤ pred b := by
rw [le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb]
apply pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem pred_le_pred {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : pred a ≤ pred b :=
succ_le_succ h.dual
theorem pred_mono : Monotone (pred : α → α) := fun _ _ => pred_le_pred
/-- See also `Order.pred_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma pred_le_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : pred b ≤ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (hab.lt.le_pred.lt_of_not_le hba) (pred_lt_of_not_isMin hab.lt.not_isMin)
· exact (pred_le _).trans hba
alias _root_.WCovBy.pred_le := pred_le_of_wcovBy
theorem pred_iterate_le (k : ℕ) (x : α) : pred^[k] x ≤ x := by
conv_rhs => rw [(by simp only [Function.iterate_id, id] : x = id^[k] x)]
exact Monotone.iterate_le_of_le pred_mono pred_le k x
theorem isMin_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : pred^[n] a = pred^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMin (pred^[n] a) :=
@isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h_eq h_lt
theorem isMin_iterate_pred_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : pred^[n] a = pred^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMin (pred^[n] a) :=
@isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h_eq h_ne
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ici a ⊆ Ioi (pred a) :=
fun _ ↦ pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le ha
theorem Iic_pred_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Iic (pred a) = Iio a :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Icc a b ⊆ Ioc (pred a) b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
apply Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ico a b ⊆ Ioo (pred a) b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iio]
gcongr
apply Ici_subset_Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Icc_pred_right_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin b) : Icc a (pred b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Iic_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem Ioc_pred_right_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin b) : Ioc a (pred b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Iic_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem pred_lt (a : α) : pred a < a :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem pred_lt_of_le : a ≤ b → pred a < b :=
pred_lt_of_not_isMin_of_le <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem le_pred_iff : a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b :=
le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin b
theorem pred_le_pred_of_le : a ≤ b → pred a ≤ pred b := by intro; simp_all
theorem pred_lt_pred : a < b → pred a < pred b := by intro; simp_all
theorem pred_strictMono : StrictMono (pred : α → α) := fun _ _ => pred_lt_pred
theorem pred_covBy (a : α) : pred a ⋖ a :=
pred_covBy_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi_pred (a : α) : Ici a ⊆ Ioi (pred a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Iic_pred (a : α) : Iic (pred a) = Iio a :=
Iic_pred_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ioc (pred a) b :=
Icc_subset_Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ Ioo (pred a) b :=
Ico_subset_Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_pred_right (a b : α) : Icc a (pred b) = Ico a b :=
Icc_pred_right_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_pred_right (a b : α) : Ioc a (pred b) = Ioo a b :=
Ioc_pred_right_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem pred_eq_iff_isMin : pred a = a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨fun h => min_of_le_pred h.ge, fun h => h.eq_of_le <| pred_le _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.pred_eq⟩ := pred_eq_iff_isMin
lemma le_iff_eq_or_le_pred : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ≤ pred b := by
by_cases hb : IsMin b
· simpa [hb.pred_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem pred_le_le_iff {a b : α} : pred a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = pred a := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hba : b ≠ a => (le_pred_of_lt <| h.2.lt_of_ne hba).antisymm h.1, ?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨pred_le b, le_rfl⟩
· exact ⟨le_rfl, pred_le a⟩
/-- See also `Order.pred_le_of_wcovBy`. -/
lemma pred_eq_of_covBy (h : a ⋖ b) : pred b = a := h.wcovBy.pred_le.antisymm (le_pred_of_lt h.lt)
alias _root_.CovBy.pred_eq := pred_eq_of_covBy
theorem _root_.OrderIso.map_pred {β : Type*} [PartialOrder β] [PredOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
f (pred a) = pred (f a) :=
f.dual.map_succ a
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem pred_eq_iff_covBy : pred b = a ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨by
rintro rfl
exact pred_covBy _, CovBy.pred_eq⟩
end NoMinOrder
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem pred_bot : pred (⊥ : α) = ⊥ :=
isMin_bot.pred_eq
theorem le_pred_iff_eq_bot : a ≤ pred a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
@succ_le_iff_eq_top αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem pred_lt_iff_ne_bot : pred a < a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ :=
@lt_succ_iff_ne_top αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end OrderBot
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem pred_lt_top (a : α) : pred a < ⊤ :=
(pred_mono le_top).trans_lt <| pred_lt_of_not_isMin not_isMin_top
theorem pred_ne_top (a : α) : pred a ≠ ⊤ :=
(pred_lt_top a).ne
end OrderTop
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem le_of_pred_lt {a b : α} : pred a < b → a ≤ b := fun h ↦ by
by_contra! nh
exact le_pred_of_lt nh |>.trans_lt h |>.false
theorem pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : pred a < b ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_pred_lt, (pred_lt_of_not_isMin ha).trans_le⟩
theorem pred_lt_pred_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) (hb : ¬IsMin b) :
pred a < pred b ↔ a < b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin ha, le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb]
theorem pred_le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) (hb : ¬IsMin b) :
pred a ≤ pred b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin hb, pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin ha]
theorem Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ioi (pred a) = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ioc (pred a) b = Icc a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ici_inter_Iic]
theorem Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ioo (pred a) b = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin ha, Ici_inter_Iio]
theorem pred_eq_pred_iff_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) (hb : ¬IsMin b) :
pred a = pred b ↔ a = b := by
rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, eq_iff_le_not_lt, pred_le_pred_iff_of_not_isMin ha hb,
pred_lt_pred_iff_of_not_isMin ha hb]
theorem pred_le_iff_eq_or_le : pred a ≤ b ↔ b = pred a ∨ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMin a
· rw [ha.pred_eq, or_iff_right_of_imp ge_of_eq]
· rw [← pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt, eq_comm]
theorem pred_lt_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : pred a < b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
(pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin ha).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem not_isMax_pred [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : ¬ IsMax (pred a) :=
not_isMin_succ (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem Ici_pred (a : α) : Ici (pred a) = insert (pred a) (Ici a) :=
ext fun _ => pred_le_iff_eq_or_le
theorem Ioi_pred_eq_insert_of_not_isMin (ha : ¬IsMin a) : Ioi (pred a) = insert a (Ioi a) := by
ext x; simp only [insert, mem_setOf, @eq_comm _ x a, mem_Ioi, Set.insert]
exact pred_lt_iff_eq_or_lt_of_not_isMin ha
theorem Icc_pred_left (h : pred a ≤ b) : Icc (pred a) b = insert (pred a) (Icc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_pred, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Iic.2 h)]
theorem Ico_pred_left (h : pred a < b) : Ico (pred a) b = insert (pred a) (Ico a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_pred, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Iio.2 h)]
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem pred_lt_iff : pred a < b ↔ a ≤ b :=
pred_lt_iff_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
theorem pred_le_pred_iff : pred a ≤ pred b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp
theorem pred_lt_pred_iff : pred a < pred b ↔ a < b := by simp
alias ⟨le_of_pred_le_pred, _⟩ := pred_le_pred_iff
alias ⟨lt_of_pred_lt_pred, _⟩ := pred_lt_pred_iff
-- TODO: prove for a pred-archimedean non-linear order with top
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_pred (a : α) : Ioi (pred a) = Ici a :=
Ioi_pred_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin a
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_pred_left (a b : α) : Ioc (pred a) b = Icc a b :=
Ioc_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
-- TODO: prove for a pred-archimedean non-linear order
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_pred_left (a b : α) : Ioo (pred a) b = Ico a b :=
Ioo_pred_left_of_not_isMin <| not_isMin _
@[simp]
theorem pred_eq_pred_iff : pred a = pred b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, pred_le_pred_iff, pred_lt_pred_iff]
theorem pred_injective : Injective (pred : α → α) := fun _ _ => pred_eq_pred_iff.1
theorem pred_ne_pred_iff : pred a ≠ pred b ↔ a ≠ b :=
pred_injective.ne_iff
alias ⟨_, pred_ne_pred⟩ := pred_ne_pred_iff
theorem pred_lt_iff_eq_or_lt : pred a < b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
pred_lt_iff.trans le_iff_eq_or_lt
theorem Ioi_pred_eq_insert (a : α) : Ioi (pred a) = insert a (Ioi a) :=
ext fun _ => pred_lt_iff_eq_or_lt.trans <| or_congr_left eq_comm
theorem Ico_pred_right_eq_insert (h : a ≤ b) : Ioc (pred a) b = insert a (Ioc a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, Ioi_pred_eq_insert, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Iic.2 h)]
theorem Ioo_pred_right_eq_insert (h : a < b) : Ioo (pred a) b = insert a (Ioo a b) := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, Ioi_pred_eq_insert, insert_inter_of_mem (mem_Iio.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff_pred_le : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ pred b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· contrapose! h
exact ⟨pred b, h, pred_lt_iff_not_isMin.mpr (not_isMin b)⟩
· ext x
suffices a < x → b ≤ x by simpa
exact fun hx ↦ le_of_pred_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h hx
end NoMinOrder
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem pred_top_lt_iff [NoMinOrder α] : pred ⊤ < a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
@lt_succ_bot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem pred_top_le_iff : pred ⊤ ≤ a ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ a = pred ⊤ :=
@le_succ_bot_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end OrderTop
end LinearOrder
/-- There is at most one way to define the predecessors in a `PartialOrder`. -/
instance [PartialOrder α] : Subsingleton (PredOrder α) :=
⟨by
intro h₀ h₁
ext a
by_cases ha : IsMin a
· exact (@IsMin.pred_eq _ _ h₀ _ ha).trans ha.pred_eq.symm
· exact @CovBy.pred_eq _ _ h₀ _ _ (pred_covBy_of_not_isMin ha)⟩
theorem pred_eq_sSup [CompleteLattice α] [PredOrder α] :
∀ a : α, pred a = sSup (Set.Iio a) :=
succ_eq_sInf (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem pred_eq_iSup [CompleteLattice α] [PredOrder α] (a : α) : pred a = ⨆ b < a, b :=
succ_eq_iInf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem pred_eq_csSup [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [PredOrder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) :
pred a = sSup (Set.Iio a) :=
succ_eq_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
/-! ### Successor-predecessor orders -/
section SuccPredOrder
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] [PredOrder α] {a b : α}
lemma le_succ_pred (a : α) : a ≤ succ (pred a) := (pred_wcovBy _).le_succ
lemma pred_succ_le (a : α) : pred (succ a) ≤ a := (wcovBy_succ _).pred_le
lemma pred_le_iff_le_succ : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b where
mp hab := (le_succ_pred _).trans (succ_mono hab)
mpr hab := (pred_mono hab).trans (pred_succ_le _)
lemma gc_pred_succ : GaloisConnection (pred : α → α) succ := fun _ _ ↦ pred_le_iff_le_succ
end Preorder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] [PredOrder α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_pred_of_not_isMin (h : ¬IsMin a) : succ (pred a) = a :=
CovBy.succ_eq (pred_covBy_of_not_isMin h)
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : pred (succ a) = a :=
CovBy.pred_eq (covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h)
theorem succ_pred [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : succ (pred a) = a :=
CovBy.succ_eq (pred_covBy _)
theorem pred_succ [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : pred (succ a) = a :=
CovBy.pred_eq (covBy_succ _)
theorem pred_succ_iterate_of_not_isMax (i : α) (n : ℕ) (hin : ¬IsMax (succ^[n - 1] i)) :
pred^[n] (succ^[n] i) = i := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Function.iterate_zero, id]
rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero] at hin
have h_not_max : ¬IsMax (succ^[n - 1] i) := by
rcases n with - | n
· simpa using hin
rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero] at hn ⊢
have h_sub_le : succ^[n] i ≤ succ^[n.succ] i := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ']
exact le_succ _
refine fun h_max => hin fun j hj => ?_
have hj_le : j ≤ succ^[n] i := h_max (h_sub_le.trans hj)
exact hj_le.trans h_sub_le
rw [Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [pred_succ_of_not_isMax hin]
exact hn h_not_max
theorem succ_pred_iterate_of_not_isMin (i : α) (n : ℕ) (hin : ¬IsMin (pred^[n - 1] i)) :
succ^[n] (pred^[n] i) = i :=
@pred_succ_iterate_of_not_isMax αᵒᵈ _ _ _ i n hin
end SuccPredOrder
end Order
|
open Order
/-! ### `WithBot`, `WithTop`
Adding a greatest/least element to a `SuccOrder` or to a `PredOrder`.
As far as successors and predecessors are concerned, there are four ways to add a bottom or top
element to an order:
* Adding a `⊤` to an `OrderTop`: Preserves `succ` and `pred`.
* Adding a `⊤` to a `NoMaxOrder`: Preserves `succ`. Never preserves `pred`.
* Adding a `⊥` to an `OrderBot`: Preserves `succ` and `pred`.
* Adding a `⊥` to a `NoMinOrder`: Preserves `pred`. Never preserves `succ`.
where "preserves `(succ/pred)`" means
`(Succ/Pred)Order α → (Succ/Pred)Order ((WithTop/WithBot) α)`.
-/
namespace WithTop
/-! #### Adding a `⊤` to an `OrderTop` -/
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 997 | 1,015 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Levenshtein distances
We define the Levenshtein edit distance `levenshtein C xy ys` between two `List α`,
with a customizable cost structure `C` for the `delete`, `insert`, and `substitute` operations.
As an auxiliary function, we define `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`, which gives the list of distances
from each suffix of `xs` to `ys`.
This is defined by recursion on `ys`, using the internal function `Levenshtein.impl`,
which computes `suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys)` using `xs`, `y`, and `suffixLevenshtein C xs ys`.
(This corresponds to the usual algorithm
using the last two rows of the matrix of distances between suffixes.)
After setting up these definitions, we prove lemmas specifying their behaviour,
particularly
```
theorem suffixLevenshtein_eq_tails_map :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1 = xs.tails.map fun xs' => levenshtein C xs' ys := ...
```
and
```
theorem levenshtein_cons_cons :
levenshtein C (x :: xs) (y :: ys) =
min (C.delete x + levenshtein C xs (y :: ys))
(min (C.insert y + levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys)
(C.substitute x y + levenshtein C xs ys)) := ...
```
-/
variable {α β δ : Type*} [AddZeroClass δ] [Min δ]
namespace Levenshtein
/-- A cost structure for Levenshtein edit distance. -/
structure Cost (α β δ : Type*) where
/-- Cost to delete an element from a list. -/
delete : α → δ
/-- Cost in insert an element into a list. -/
insert : β → δ
/-- Cost to substitute one element for another in a list. -/
substitute : α → β → δ
/-- The default cost structure, for which all operations cost `1`. -/
@[simps]
def defaultCost [DecidableEq α] : Cost α α ℕ where
delete _ := 1
insert _ := 1
substitute a b := if a = b then 0 else 1
instance [DecidableEq α] : Inhabited (Cost α α ℕ) := ⟨defaultCost⟩
/--
Cost structure given by a function.
Delete and insert cost the same, and substitution costs the greater value.
-/
@[simps]
def weightCost (f : α → ℕ) : Cost α α ℕ where
delete a := f a
insert b := f b
substitute a b := max (f a) (f b)
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost String.length
/--
Cost structure for strings, where cost is the log base 2 length of the token.
-/
@[simps!]
def stringLogLengthCost : Cost String String ℕ := weightCost fun s => Nat.log2 (s.length + 1)
variable (C : Cost α β δ)
/--
(Implementation detail for `levenshtein`)
Given a list `xs` and the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to some other list `ys`,
compute the Levenshtein distances from each suffix of `xs` to `y :: ys`.
(Note that we don't actually need to know `ys` itself here, so it is not an argument.)
The return value is a list of length `x.length + 1`,
and it is convenient for the recursive calls that we bundle this list
with a proof that it is non-empty.
-/
def impl
(xs : List α) (y : β) (d : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length}) : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length} :=
let ⟨ds, w⟩ := d
xs.zip (ds.zip ds.tail) |>.foldr
(init := ⟨[C.insert y + ds.getLast (List.length_pos_iff.mp w)], by simp⟩)
(fun ⟨x, d₀, d₁⟩ ⟨r, w⟩ =>
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d₀) (C.substitute x y + d₁)) :: r, by simp⟩)
variable {C}
variable (x : α) (xs : List α) (y : β) (d : δ) (ds : List δ) (w : 0 < (d :: ds).length)
-- Note this lemma has an unspecified proof `w'` on the right-hand-side,
-- which will become an extra goal when rewriting.
theorem impl_cons (w' : 0 < List.length ds) :
impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩ =
let ⟨r, w⟩ := impl C xs y ⟨ds, w'⟩
⟨min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d) (C.substitute x y + ds[0])) :: r, by simp⟩ :=
match ds, w' with | _ :: _, _ => rfl
-- Note this lemma has two unspecified proofs: `h` appears on the left-hand-side
-- and should be found by matching, but `w'` will become an extra goal when rewriting.
theorem impl_cons_fst_zero (h : 0 < (impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩).val.length)
(w' : 0 < List.length ds) : (impl C (x :: xs) y ⟨d :: ds, w⟩).1[0] =
let ⟨r, w⟩ := impl C xs y ⟨ds, w'⟩
min (C.delete x + r[0]) (min (C.insert y + d) (C.substitute x y + ds[0])) :=
match ds, w' with | _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem impl_length (d : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length}) (w : d.1.length = xs.length + 1) :
(impl C xs y d).1.length = xs.length + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing d with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih =>
dsimp [impl]
match d, w with
| ⟨d₁ :: d₂ :: ds, _⟩, w =>
dsimp
congr 1
exact ih ⟨d₂ :: ds, (by simp)⟩ (by simpa using w)
end Levenshtein
open Levenshtein
variable (C : Cost α β δ)
/--
`suffixLevenshtein C xs ys` computes the Levenshtein distance
(using the cost functions provided by a `C : Cost α β δ`)
from each suffix of the list `xs` to the list `ys`.
The first element of this list is the Levenshtein distance from `xs` to `ys`.
Note that if the cost functions do not satisfy the inequalities
* `C.delete a + C.insert b ≥ C.substitute a b`
* `C.substitute a b + C.substitute b c ≥ C.substitute a c`
(or if any values are negative)
then the edit distances calculated here may not agree with the general
geodesic distance on the edit graph.
-/
def suffixLevenshtein (xs : List α) (ys : List β) : {r : List δ // 0 < r.length} :=
ys.foldr
(impl C xs)
(xs.foldr (init := ⟨[0], by simp⟩) (fun a ⟨r, w⟩ => ⟨(C.delete a + r[0]) :: r, by simp⟩))
variable {C}
theorem suffixLevenshtein_length (xs : List α) (ys : List β) :
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1.length = xs.length + 1 := by
induction ys with
| nil =>
dsimp [suffixLevenshtein]
induction xs with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ xs ih =>
simp_all
| cons y ys ih =>
dsimp [suffixLevenshtein]
rw [impl_length]
exact ih
-- This is only used in keeping track of estimates.
theorem suffixLevenshtein_eq (xs : List α) (y ys) :
impl C xs y (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys) = suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys) := by
rfl
variable (C)
/--
`levenshtein C xs ys` computes the Levenshtein distance
(using the cost functions provided by a `C : Cost α β δ`)
from the list `xs` to the list `ys`.
Note that if the cost functions do not satisfy the inequalities
* `C.delete a + C.insert b ≥ C.substitute a b`
* `C.substitute a b + C.substitute b c ≥ C.substitute a c`
(or if any values are negative)
then the edit distance calculated here may not agree with the general
geodesic distance on the edit graph.
-/
def levenshtein (xs : List α) (ys : List β) : δ :=
let ⟨r, w⟩ := suffixLevenshtein C xs ys
r[0]
variable {C}
theorem suffixLevenshtein_nil_nil : (suffixLevenshtein C [] []).1 = [0] := by
rfl
-- Not sure if this belongs in the main `List` API, or can stay local.
theorem List.eq_of_length_one (x : List α) (w : x.length = 1) :
have : 0 < x.length := lt_of_lt_of_eq Nat.zero_lt_one w.symm
x = [x[0]] := by
match x, w with
| [r], _ => rfl
theorem suffixLevenshtein_nil' (ys : List β) :
(suffixLevenshtein C [] ys).1 = [levenshtein C [] ys] :=
List.eq_of_length_one _ (suffixLevenshtein_length [] _)
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₂ (xs : List α) (y ys) :
suffixLevenshtein C xs (y :: ys) = (impl C xs) y (suffixLevenshtein C xs ys) :=
rfl
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_aux {α} {x y : { l : List α // 0 < l.length }}
(w₀ : x.1[0]'x.2 = y.1[0]'y.2) (w : x.1.tail = y.1.tail) : x = y := by
match x, y with
| ⟨hx :: tx, _⟩, ⟨hy :: ty, _⟩ => simp_all
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁
(x : α) (xs ys) :
suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys =
⟨levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys ::
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1, by simp⟩ := by
induction ys with
| nil =>
dsimp [levenshtein, suffixLevenshtein]
| cons y ys ih =>
apply suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_aux
· rfl
· rw [suffixLevenshtein_cons₂ (x :: xs), ih, impl_cons]
· rfl
· simp [suffixLevenshtein_length]
|
theorem suffixLevenshtein_cons₁_fst (x : α) (xs ys) :
(suffixLevenshtein C (x :: xs) ys).1 =
levenshtein C (x :: xs) ys ::
(suffixLevenshtein C xs ys).1 := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/EditDistance/Defs.lean | 241 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
/-!
# N-ary images of sets
This file defines `Set.image2`, the binary image of sets.
This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations and `Set.seq`.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Finset.NAry`, to `Order.Filter.NAry`, and to
`Data.Option.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ}
variable {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} {u : Set γ} {v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem mem_image2_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a', ha', b', hb', h⟩
rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩, fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
/-- image2 is monotone with respect to `⊆`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb)
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s t' :=
image2_subset Subset.rfl ht
@[gcongr]
theorem image2_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t :=
image2_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem image_subset_image2_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ ha => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb
theorem image_subset_image2_right (ha : a ∈ s) : f a '' t ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ => mem_image2_of_mem ha
lemma forall_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
lemma exists_mem_image2 {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by aesop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image2_iff := forall_mem_image2
@[simp]
theorem image2_subset_iff {u : Set γ} : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_mem_image2
theorem image2_subset_iff_left : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (fun b => f a b) '' t ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage]
theorem image2_subset_iff_right : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage, @forall₂_swap α]
variable (f)
@[simp]
lemma image_prod : (fun x : α × β ↦ f x.1 x.2) '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
ext fun _ ↦ by simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] lemma image_uncurry_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : uncurry f '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
image_prod _
@[simp] lemma image2_mk_eq_prod : image2 Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := ext <| by simp
@[simp]
lemma image2_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 (fun a b ↦ f (a, b)) s t = f '' s ×ˢ t := by
simp [← image_uncurry_prod, uncurry]
theorem image2_swap (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => f b a) t s := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨b, hb, a, ha, rfl⟩
variable {f}
theorem image2_union_left : image2 f (s ∪ s') t = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_prod, union_prod, image_union]
theorem image2_union_right : image2 f s (t ∪ t') = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s t' := by
rw [← image2_swap, image2_union_left, image2_swap f, image2_swap f]
lemma image2_inter_left (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f (s ∩ s') t = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, inter_prod, image_inter hf.uncurry]
lemma image2_inter_right (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f s (t ∩ t') = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, prod_inter, image_inter hf.uncurry]
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_left : image2 f ∅ t = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_right : image2 f s ∅ = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
theorem Nonempty.image2 : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (image2 f s t).Nonempty :=
fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ⟨_, hb⟩ => ⟨_, mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem image2_nonempty_iff : (image2 f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_, a, ha, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, b, hb⟩, fun h => h.1.image2 h.2⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_left (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_right (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem image2_eq_empty_iff : image2 f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image2_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
simp [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem Subsingleton.image2 (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) (f : α → β → γ) :
(image2 f s t).Subsingleton := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply (hs.prod ht).image
theorem image2_inter_subset_left : image2 f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_right) s s'
theorem image2_inter_subset_right : image2 f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_left) t t'
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_left : image2 f {a} t = f a '' t :=
ext fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_right : image2 f s {b} = (fun a => f a b) '' s :=
ext fun x => by simp
theorem image2_singleton : image2 f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_left : image2 f (insert a s) t = (fun b => f a b) '' t ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_left, image2_singleton_left]
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_right : image2 f s (insert b t) = (fun a => f a b) '' s ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_right, image2_singleton_right]
@[congr]
theorem image2_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨a, ha, b, hb, by rw [h a ha b hb]⟩
/-- A common special case of `image2_congr` -/
theorem image2_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t :=
image2_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
theorem image_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
g '' image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t := by
simp only [← image_prod, image_image]
theorem image2_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image2 f (g '' s) t = image2 (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t := by
ext; simp
| Mathlib/Data/Set/NAry.lean | 177 | 177 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
/-- See also `continuousWithinAt_diff_singleton` for the case of `s \ {y}`, but
requiring `T1Space α. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_diff_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ {x}) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_singleton.diff_iff
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_compl_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f {x}ᶜ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, continuousWithinAt_diff_self, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousOn.mono (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (hf x (h hx)).mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono _ h)
theorem antitone_continuousOn {f : α → β} : Antitone (ContinuousOn f) := fun _s _t hst hf =>
hf.mono hst
/-!
### Relation between `ContinuousAt` and `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
ContinuousWithinAt.mono ((continuousWithinAt_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [← univ_inter s, continuousWithinAt_inter h, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt hs).mp h
theorem IsOpen.continuousOn_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ContinuousAt f a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt ∘ hs.mem_nhds
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousAt (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).continuousAt hx
theorem continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hcont x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContinuousAt.continuousOn := continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.continuousOn (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at h
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem Continuous.continuousWithinAt (h : Continuous f) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-!
### Congruence properties with respect to functions
-/
theorem ContinuousOn.congr_mono (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn g s₁ := by
intro x hx
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at A
rw [← h' hx] at A
exact A.congr' h'.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin.symm
theorem ContinuousOn.congr (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (Subset.refl _)
theorem continuousOn_congr (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
⟨fun h => ContinuousOn.congr h h'.symm, fun h => h.congr h'⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : f x = g x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx, tendsto_congr' h, ContinuousWithinAt]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
(h₁.congr_continuousWithinAt hx).2 h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_mem (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) h₁)
(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_insert (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] g) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h.symm,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin h₁) hx
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr (fun x hx ↦ (h₁ x hx).symm) hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_insert (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_insert
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_mono
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s₁ x :=
(h.mono h₁).congr h' hx
theorem ContinuousAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : g =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
ContinuousAt g x := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at h ⊢
exact h.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (by rwa [nhdsWithin_univ]) (mem_univ x)
/-!
### Composition
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_inter hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within f hf h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x)
(hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hs).comp hf (mapsTo_image f s)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] y) (hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image hf hs
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt {g : β → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.continuousWithinAt.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {g : β → γ} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_continuousWithinAt hf
/-- See also `ContinuousOn.comp'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx =>
ContinuousWithinAt.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
/-- Variant of `ContinuousOn.comp` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (fun x => g (f x)) s :=
ContinuousOn.comp hg hf h
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
/-- See also `Continuous.comp_continuousOn'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.continuousOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
/-- Variant of `Continuous.comp_continuousOn` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ g (f x)) s :=
hg.comp_continuousOn hf
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : Continuous (g ∘ f) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at *
exact hg.comp hf fun x _ => hs x
theorem ContinuousOn.image_comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hg : ContinuousOn g (f '' s)) (hf : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.comp hf.continuousOn (s.mapsTo_image f)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} {x : α}
{s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x :=
ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt hf (hg.prodMk_nhds hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β}
{h : α → γ} {x : α} {s : Set α} {y : β × γ} (hf : ContinuousAt f y)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) (hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂_continuousWithinAt hg hh
/-!
| ### Image
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 1,017 | 1,021 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PurelyInseparable.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PerfectClosure
/-!
# `IsPerfectClosure` predicate
This file contains `IsPerfectClosure` which asserts that `L` is a perfect closure of `K` under a
ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L`, as well as its basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `pNilradical`: given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`).
- `IsPRadical`: a ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L` of characteristic `p` rings is called `p`-radical,
if or any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`,
and the kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
A generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields.
- `IsPerfectClosure`: if `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a
perfect closure of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite.
- `PerfectRing.lift`: if a `p`-radical ring homomorphism `K →+* L` is given, `M` is a perfect ring,
then any ring homomorphism `K →+* M` can be lifted to `L →+* M`.
This is similar to `IsAlgClosed.lift` and `IsSepClosed.lift`.
- `PerfectRing.liftEquiv`: `K →+* M` is one-to-one correspondence to `L →+* M`,
given by `PerfectRing.lift`. This is a generalization to `PerfectClosure.lift`.
- `IsPerfectClosure.equiv`: perfect closures of a ring are isomorphic.
## Main results
- `IsPRadical.trans`: composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical.
- `PerfectClosure.isPRadical`: the absolute perfect closure `PerfectClosure` is a `p`-radical
extension over the base ring, in particular, it is a perfect closure of the base ring.
- `IsPRadical.isPurelyInseparable`, `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical`: `p`-radical and
purely inseparable are equivalent for fields.
- The (relative) perfect closure `perfectClosure` is a perfect closure
(inferred from `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical` automatically by Lean).
## Tags
perfect ring, perfect closure, purely inseparable
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
/-- Given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`). -/
def pNilradical (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Ideal R := if 1 < p then nilradical R else ⊥
theorem pNilradical_le_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} :
pNilradical R p ≤ nilradical R := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
simp_rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp, bot_le]
theorem pNilradical_eq_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := by rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬ 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := by rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp]
|
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot' {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≤ 1) :
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsPerfectClosure.lean | 84 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ￢a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ￢a ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem hnot_bot : ￢(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_top : ￢(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
theorem hnot_hnot_le : ￢￢a ≤ a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
theorem hnot_anti : Antitone (hnot : α → α) := fun _ _ h => hnot_le_comm.1 <| hnot_hnot_le.trans h
theorem hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ￢b ≤ ￢a :=
hnot_anti h
@[simp]
theorem hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ￢￢￢a = ￢a :=
hnot_hnot_le.antisymm <| hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : Codisjoint (￢￢a) b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
| simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 869 | 870 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Split polynomials
A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its
irreducible factors over `L` have degree `1`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Splits i f`: A predicate on a homomorphism `i : K →+* L` from a commutative ring to a
field and a polynomial `f` saying that `f.map i` is zero or all of its irreducible factors over
`L` have degree `1`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- A polynomial `Splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1. -/
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.orderSucc_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i ((degree_map_le.trans hf).antisymm hif)
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
theorem splits_pow {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (n : ℕ) : (f ^ n).Splits i := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact splits_prod i fun j _ => hf
theorem splits_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).Splits i :=
splits_pow i (splits_X i) n
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : K[X]} : (f.map i).Splits (RingHom.id L) ↔ f.Splits i := by
rw [splits_map_iff, RingHom.id_comp]
variable {i}
theorem Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i := by
by_cases hzero : map i (f.comp p) = 0
· exact Or.inl hzero
cases h with
| inl h0 =>
exact Or.inl <| map_comp i _ _ ▸ h0.symm ▸ zero_comp
| inr h =>
right
intro g irr dvd
rw [map_comp] at dvd hzero
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hd with
| | inl hd =>
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (Nat.WithBot.lt_one_iff_le_zero.mp hd), comp_C] at dvd hzero
refine False.elim (irr.1 (isUnit_of_dvd_unit dvd ?_))
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 154 | 156 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Defs
/-!
# Algebras over commutative semirings
In this file we define associative unital `Algebra`s over commutative (semi)rings.
* algebra homomorphisms `AlgHom` are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom`;
* algebra equivalences `AlgEquiv` are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv`;
* `Subalgebra`s are defined in `Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra`;
* The category `AlgebraCat R` of `R`-algebras is defined in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Algebra.Basic`.
See the implementation notes for remarks about non-associative and non-unital algebras.
## Main definitions:
* `Algebra R A`: the algebra typeclass.
* `algebraMap R A : R →+* A`: the canonical map from `R` to `A`, as a `RingHom`. This is the
preferred spelling of this map, it is also available as:
* `Algebra.linearMap R A : R →ₗ[R] A`, a `LinearMap`.
* `Algebra.ofId R A : R →ₐ[R] A`, an `AlgHom` (defined in a later file).
## Implementation notes
Given a commutative (semi)ring `R`, there are two ways to define an `R`-algebra structure on a
(possibly noncommutative) (semi)ring `A`:
* By endowing `A` with a morphism of rings `R →+* A` denoted `algebraMap R A` which lands in the
center of `A`.
* By requiring `A` be an `R`-module such that the action associates and commutes with multiplication
as `r • (a₁ * a₂) = (r • a₁) * a₂ = a₁ * (r • a₂)`.
We define `Algebra R A` in a way that subsumes both definitions, by extending `SMul R A` and
requiring that this scalar action `r • x` must agree with left multiplication by the image of the
structure morphism `algebraMap R A r * x`.
As a result, there are two ways to talk about an `R`-algebra `A` when `A` is a semiring:
1. ```lean
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
variable [Algebra R A]
```
2. ```lean
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
```
The first approach implies the second via typeclass search; so any lemma stated with the second set
of arguments will automatically apply to the first set. Typeclass search does not know that the
second approach implies the first, but this can be shown with:
```lean
example {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] : Algebra R A :=
Algebra.ofModule smul_mul_assoc mul_smul_comm
```
The advantage of the first approach is that `algebraMap R A` is available, and `AlgHom R A B` and
`Subalgebra R A` can be used. For concrete `R` and `A`, `algebraMap R A` is often definitionally
convenient.
The advantage of the second approach is that `CommSemiring R`, `Semiring A`, and `Module R A` can
all be relaxed independently; for instance, this allows us to:
* Replace `Semiring A` with `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A` in order to describe non-unital and/or
non-associative algebras.
* Replace `CommSemiring R` and `Module R A` with `CommGroup R'` and `DistribMulAction R' A`,
which when `R' = Rˣ` lets us talk about the "algebra-like" action of `Rˣ` on an
`R`-algebra `A`.
While `AlgHom R A B` cannot be used in the second approach, `NonUnitalAlgHom R A B` still can.
You should always use the first approach when working with associative unital algebras, and mimic
the second approach only when you need to weaken a condition on either `R` or `A`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Finset Module.End
universe u v w u₁ v₁
section Prio
/-- An associative unital `R`-algebra is a semiring `A` equipped with a map into its center `R → A`.
See the implementation notes in this file for discussion of the details of this definition.
-/
class Algebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] extends SMul R A where
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `Algebra` structure.
Use `algebraMap` from the root namespace instead. -/
protected algebraMap : R →+* A
commutes' : ∀ r x, algebraMap r * x = x * algebraMap r
smul_def' : ∀ r x, r • x = algebraMap r * x
end Prio
/-- Embedding `R →+* A` given by `Algebra` structure. -/
def algebraMap (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : R →+* A :=
Algebra.algebraMap
/-- Coercion from a commutative semiring to an algebra over this semiring. -/
@[coe, reducible]
def Algebra.cast {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : R → A :=
algebraMap R A
namespace algebraMap
scoped instance coeHTCT (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
CoeHTCT R A :=
⟨Algebra.cast⟩
section CommSemiringSemiring
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : R) : A) = 0 :=
map_zero (algebraMap R A)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : R) : A) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap R A)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (a : ℕ) : (↑(a : R) : A) = a :=
map_natCast (algebraMap R A) a
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (a b : R) : (↑(a + b : R) : A) = ↑a + ↑b :=
map_add (algebraMap R A) a b
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (a b : R) : (↑(a * b : R) : A) = ↑a * ↑b :=
map_mul (algebraMap R A) a b
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (↑(a ^ n : R) : A) = (a : A) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap R A) _ _
end CommSemiringSemiring
section CommRingRing
variable {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : R) : (↑(-x : R) : A) = -↑x :=
map_neg (algebraMap R A) x
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (a b : R) :
(↑(a - b : R) : A) = ↑a - ↑b :=
map_sub (algebraMap R A) a b
end CommRingRing
end algebraMap
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to the center of a semiring.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev RingHom.toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) : Algebra R S where
smul c x := i c * x
commutes' := h
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
algebraMap := i
-- just simple lemmas for a declaration that is itself primed, no need for docstrings
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem RingHom.smul_toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) (r : R) (s : S) :
let _ := RingHom.toAlgebra' i h
r • s = i r * s := rfl
set_option linter.docPrime false in
theorem RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra' {R S} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(h : ∀ c x, i c * x = x * i c) :
@algebraMap R S _ _ (i.toAlgebra' h) = i :=
rfl
/-- Creating an algebra from a morphism to a commutative semiring.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev RingHom.toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S) : Algebra R S :=
i.toAlgebra' fun _ => mul_comm _
theorem RingHom.smul_toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S)
(r : R) (s : S) :
let _ := RingHom.toAlgebra i
r • s = i r * s := rfl
theorem RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra {R S} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (i : R →+* S) :
@algebraMap R S _ _ i.toAlgebra = i :=
rfl
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {A : Type w} {B : Type*}
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `Module R` structure.
If `(r • 1) * x = x * (r • 1) = r • x` for all `r : R` and `x : A`, then `A` is an `Algebra`
over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev ofModule' [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), r • (1 : A) * x = r • x)
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x : A), x * r • (1 : A) = r • x) : Algebra R A where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun r := r • (1 : A)
map_one' := one_smul _ _
map_mul' r₁ r₂ := by simp only [h₁, mul_smul]
map_zero' := zero_smul _ _
map_add' r₁ r₂ := add_smul r₁ r₂ 1 }
commutes' r x := by simp [h₁, h₂]
smul_def' r x := by simp [h₁]
/-- Let `R` be a commutative semiring, let `A` be a semiring with a `Module R` structure.
If `(r • x) * y = x * (r • y) = r • (x * y)` for all `r : R` and `x y : A`, then `A`
is an `Algebra` over `R`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev ofModule [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Module R A]
(h₁ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), r • x * y = r • (x * y))
(h₂ : ∀ (r : R) (x y : A), x * r • y = r • (x * y)) : Algebra R A :=
ofModule' (fun r x => by rw [h₁, one_mul]) fun r x => by rw [h₂, mul_one]
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
-- We'll later use this to show `Algebra ℤ M` is a subsingleton.
/-- To prove two algebra structures on a fixed `[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]` agree,
it suffices to check the `algebraMap`s agree.
-/
@[ext]
theorem algebra_ext {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {A : Type*} [Semiring A] (P Q : Algebra R A)
(h : ∀ r : R, (haveI := P; algebraMap R A r) = haveI := Q; algebraMap R A r) :
P = Q := by
replace h : P.algebraMap = Q.algebraMap := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
have h' : (haveI := P; (· • ·) : R → A → A) = (haveI := Q; (· • ·) : R → A → A) := by
funext r a
rw [P.smul_def', Q.smul_def', h]
rcases P with @⟨⟨P⟩⟩
rcases Q with @⟨⟨Q⟩⟩
congr
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) toModule {R A} {_ : CommSemiring R} {_ : Semiring A} [Algebra R A] :
Module R A where
one_smul _ := by simp [smul_def']
mul_smul := by simp [smul_def', mul_assoc]
smul_add := by simp [smul_def', mul_add]
smul_zero := by simp [smul_def']
add_smul := by simp [smul_def', add_mul]
zero_smul := by simp [smul_def']
theorem smul_def (r : R) (x : A) : r • x = algebraMap R A r * x :=
Algebra.smul_def' r x
theorem algebraMap_eq_smul_one (r : R) : algebraMap R A r = r • (1 : A) :=
calc
algebraMap R A r = algebraMap R A r * 1 := (mul_one _).symm
_ = r • (1 : A) := (Algebra.smul_def r 1).symm
theorem algebraMap_eq_smul_one' : ⇑(algebraMap R A) = fun r => r • (1 : A) :=
funext algebraMap_eq_smul_one
/-- `mul_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem commutes (r : R) (x : A) : algebraMap R A r * x = x * algebraMap R A r :=
Algebra.commutes' r x
lemma commute_algebraMap_left (r : R) (x : A) : Commute (algebraMap R A r) x :=
Algebra.commutes r x
lemma commute_algebraMap_right (r : R) (x : A) : Commute x (algebraMap R A r) :=
(Algebra.commutes r x).symm
/-- `mul_left_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem left_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
x * (algebraMap R A r * y) = algebraMap R A r * (x * y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← commutes, mul_assoc]
/-- `mul_right_comm` for `Algebra`s when one element is from the base ring. -/
theorem right_comm (x : A) (r : R) (y : A) :
x * algebraMap R A r * y = x * y * algebraMap R A r := by
rw [mul_assoc, commutes, ← mul_assoc]
instance _root_.IsScalarTower.right : IsScalarTower R A A :=
⟨fun x y z => by rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, smul_def, smul_def, mul_assoc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.RingHom.smulOneHom_eq_algebraMap : RingHom.smulOneHom = algebraMap R A :=
RingHom.ext fun r => (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm
-- TODO: set up `IsScalarTower.smulCommClass` earlier so that we can actually prove this using
| -- `mul_smul_comm s x y`.
/-- This is just a special case of the global `mul_smul_comm` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
@[simp]
protected theorem mul_smul_comm (s : R) (x y : A) : x * s • y = s • (x * y) := by
rw [smul_def, smul_def, left_comm]
/-- This is just a special case of the global `smul_mul_assoc` lemma that requires less typeclass
search (and was here first). -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Defs.lean | 301 | 310 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal.Lemmas
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file, by design, is independent of `NormedSpace` in the import hierarchy. It contains
important specific limit computations in metric spaces, in ordered rings/fields, and in specific
instances of these such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis NormedSpace
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem tendsto_one_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1/(n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1
theorem NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← NNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem NNReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem EReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {C : EReal} (h : C ≠ ⊥) (h' : C ≠ ⊤) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) = fun n : ℕ ↦ ((C.toReal / n : ℝ) : EReal) := by
ext n
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal h' h, ← coe_coe_eq_natCast n, ← coe_div C.toReal n]
rw [this, ← coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat C.toReal
theorem tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) by simpa
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (_root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1)
theorem NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜]
[Algebra ℝ≥0 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (continuous_algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜).continuousAt.tendsto.comp
tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero]
theorem tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 𝕜
/-- The limit of `n / (n + x)` is 1, for any constant `x` (valid in `ℝ` or any topological division
algebra over `ℝ`, e.g., `ℂ`).
TODO: introduce a typeclass saying that `1 / n` tends to 0 at top, making it possible to get this
statement simultaneously on `ℚ`, `ℝ` and `ℂ`. -/
theorem tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [DivisionRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
[CharZero 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] [IsTopologicalDivisionRing 𝕜] (x : 𝕜) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : 𝕜) / (n + x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn ↦ _)) _
· exact fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (1 + x / n)
· field_simp [Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn]
· have : 𝓝 (1 : 𝕜) = 𝓝 (1 / (1 + x * (0 : 𝕜))) := by
rw [mul_zero, add_zero, div_one]
rw [this]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div (tendsto_const_nhds.add ?_) (by simp)
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_
have := ((continuous_algebraMap ℝ 𝕜).tendsto _).comp tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero, Filter.tendsto_atTop'] at this
refine Iff.mpr tendsto_atTop' ?_
intros
simp_all only [comp_apply, map_inv₀, map_natCast]
/-- For any positive `m : ℕ`, `((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)` tends to `0` as `n` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mod_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have h0 : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, 0 ≤ (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ)) n := by aesop
exact tendsto_bdd_div_atTop_nhds_zero h0
(.of_forall (fun n ↦ cast_le.mpr (mod_lt n hm).le)) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel {α G : Type*} [GroupWithZero G] {f g : α → G}
{l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓟 {0}ᶜ)) : (fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x := by
filter_upwards [hg.le_comap <| preimage_mem_comap (m := g) (mem_principal_self {0}ᶜ)] with x hx
aesop
/-- If `g` tends to `∞`, then eventually for all `x` we have `(f x / g x) * g x = f x`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
(fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x :=
div_mul_cancel <| hg.mono_right <| le_principal_iff.mpr <|
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) <| by simp
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
(hlim.pos_mul_atTop ha hg).congr' (EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop hg)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.den {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
[ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto g l atTop :=
have hlim' : Tendsto (fun x => g x / f x) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) := by
simp_rw [← inv_div (f _)]
exact Filter.Tendsto.inv (f := fun x => f x / g x) hlim
(hlim'.pos_mul_atTop (inv_pos_of_pos ha) hf).congr' (.div_mul_cancel_atTop hf)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `f x / g x` tends to a positive constant, then `f` tends to `∞` if
and only if `g` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num_atTop_iff_den_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [TopologicalSpace K]
[OrderTopology K] [ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto g l atTop :=
⟨fun hf ↦ Tendsto.den hf ha hlim, fun hg ↦ Tendsto.num hg ha hlim⟩
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos
[Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (r + 1) ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' (pow_right_mono₀ <| le_add_of_nonneg_left h.le) <|
not_bddAbove_iff.2 fun _ ↦ Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
[Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 1 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop atTop :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
theorem Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ m ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt h) ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt h)
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(fun hr ↦ (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).mp <| by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, ← hr, tendsto_const_nhds])
(fun hr ↦
have := (one_lt_inv₀ hr).2 h₂ |> tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp this).congr fun n ↦ by simp)
@[simp] theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ |r| < 1 := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by_contra (fun hr_le ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· by_cases hr : 1 = |r|
· replace h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ |r|^n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by simpa only [← abs_pow, h]
simp only [hr.symm, one_pow] at h
exact zero_ne_one <| tendsto_nhds_unique h tendsto_const_nhds
· apply @not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop 𝕜 ℕ _ _ _ _ atTop _ (fun n ↦ |r| ^ n) _ 0 _
· refine (pow_right_strictMono₀ <| lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le)
hr).monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop (fun b ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (pow_unbounded_of_one_lt b (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le) hr))
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
· simpa only [← abs_pow]
· simpa only [← abs_pow] using (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg r)) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhdsWithin_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2
⟨tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ pow_pos h₁ _⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_one {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r)
(h₁ : r < 1) :
(uniformity α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ ↦ True) fun k ↦ { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ ↦ pow_pos h₀ _) fun _ ε0 ↦
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp fun _ hk ↦ ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
theorem geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) : c ^ n * u 0 < u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) : u n < c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _ <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : Tendsto v atTop atTop :=
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun n ↦ geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n fun k _ ↦ hu k) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt hc).atTop_mul_const h₀
theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.1 <| by
simp only [NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_zero,
_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr]
@[simp]
protected theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [coe_pow, coe_zero, abs_eq, coe_lt_one, val_eq_coe] using
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp <| tendsto_coe.mpr h, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero]
norm_cast at *
apply NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
lift r to NNReal
· refine fun hr ↦ top_ne_zero (tendsto_nhds_unique (EventuallyEq.tendsto ?_) (hr ▸ h))
exact eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨1, fun _ hn ↦ pow_eq_top_iff.mpr ⟨rfl, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hn⟩⟩
rw [← coe_zero] at h
norm_cast at h ⊢
exact NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp h
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_top_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ r^n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) ↔ 1 < r := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose!
intro r_le_one h_tends
specialize h_tends (Ioi_mem_nhds one_lt_top)
simp only [Filter.mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, ge_iff_le, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Ioi] at h_tends
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h_tends
exact lt_irrefl _ <| lt_of_lt_of_le (hn n le_rfl) <| pow_le_one₀ (zero_le _) r_le_one
· intro r_gt_one
have obs := @Tendsto.inv ℝ≥0∞ ℕ _ _ _ (fun n ↦ (r⁻¹)^n) atTop 0
simp only [ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff, inv_zero] at obs
simpa [← ENNReal.inv_pow] using obs <| ENNReal.inv_lt_one.mpr r_gt_one
lemma ENNReal.eq_zero_of_le_mul_pow {x r : ℝ≥0∞} {ε : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≤ ε * r ^ n) : x = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine ge_of_tendsto' (f := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ε * r ^ n) (x := atTop) ?_ h
rw [← mul_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞) (a := ε)]
exact Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr) (Or.inr coe_ne_top)
/-! ### Geometric series -/
section Geometric
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have : r ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt h₂
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
(hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr <| by
simp_all [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem summable_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_two : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) 2 := by
convert hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one _ _ <;> norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_two⟩
theorem summable_geometric_two_encode {ι : Type*} [Encodable ι] :
Summable fun i : ι ↦ (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ Encodable.encode i :=
summable_geometric_two.comp_injective Encodable.encode_injective
theorem tsum_geometric_two : (∑' n : ℕ, ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) = 2 :=
hasSum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
theorem sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i) ≤ 2 := by
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i := by
intro i
apply pow_nonneg
norm_num
convert summable_geometric_two.sum_le_tsum (range n) (fun i _ ↦ this i)
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two : (∑' n : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ n) = 2 :=
(inv_eq_one_div (2 : ℝ)).symm ▸ tsum_geometric_two
/-- The sum of `2⁻¹ ^ i` for `n ≤ i` equals `2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two_ge (n : ℕ) :
(∑' i, ite (n ≤ i) ((2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ i) 0) = 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n := by
have A : Summable fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0 := by
simpa only [← piecewise_eq_indicator, one_div]
using summable_geometric_two.indicator {i | n ≤ i}
have B : ((Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0) = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi ↦
ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h ↦ (lt_irrefl _ ((Finset.mem_range.1 hi).trans_le h)).elim
simp only [← Summable.sum_add_tsum_nat_add n A, B, if_true, zero_add, zero_le',
le_add_iff_nonneg_left, pow_add, _root_.tsum_mul_right, tsum_geometric_inv_two]
theorem hasSum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n) a := by
convert HasSum.mul_left (a / 2)
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one) using 1
· funext n
simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
rfl
· norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n :=
⟨a, hasSum_geometric_two' a⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n : ℕ, a / 2 / 2 ^ n = a :=
(hasSum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
theorem NNReal.hasSum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
apply NNReal.hasSum_coe.1
push_cast
rw [NNReal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)]
exact hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr
theorem NNReal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
rcases lt_or_le r 1 with hr | hr
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
norm_cast at *
convert ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr)
rw [ENNReal.coe_inv <| ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr, coe_sub, coe_one]
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hr, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_eq_top]
refine fun a ha ↦
(ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp fun n hn ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hn ?_
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ range n, 1 := by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, r ^ i := by gcongr; apply one_le_pow₀ hr
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric_add_one (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ (n + 1) = r * (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ', ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
end Geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section EdistLeGeometric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C * r ^ n)
include hr hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric : CauchySeq f := by
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu ?_
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top hC (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 ?_)
exact (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne'
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _
simp only [pow_add, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end EdistLeGeometric
section EdistLeGeometricTwo
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C / 2 ^ n) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a))
include hC hu in
| /-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : CauchySeq f := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at hu
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C ?_ hC hu
simp [ENNReal.one_lt_two]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Basic.lean | 439 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} : IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso (inv α) hc)
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)),
IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso α⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G] [ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(hc : IsUniversalColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun F' c' α f h hα H ↦
⟨isColimitOfReflects _ (hc (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G) (fun j ↦ (H j).map G)).some⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[∀ (i j : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ F.obj j) (g : i ⟶ j), PreservesLimit (cospan f (F.map g)) G]
[∀ (i : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) G]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G]
[PreservesColimitsOfShape J G]
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(H : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine (Iff.trans ?_ (H (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G))).trans (forall_congr' fun j => ?_)
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨isColimitOfPreserves G h.some⟩, fun h => ⟨isColimitOfReflects G h.some⟩⟩
· exact IsPullback.map_iff G (NatTrans.congr_app h.symm j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.mapCocone_iff (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[G.IsEquivalence] : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G, fun hc ↦ by
let e : F ⋙ G ⋙ Functor.inv G ≅ F := NatIso.hcomp (Iso.refl F) G.asEquivalence.unitIso.symm
apply IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G.inv
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff e.inv).mp
exact hc.of_iso (Cocones.ext (G.asEquivalence.unitIso.app c.pt) (fun j => (by simp [e])))⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα H
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) ?_ using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· convert congr_arg (whiskerLeft e.inverse) e'
ext
simp
· intro k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
| exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsUniversalColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 231 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 1,453 | 1,462 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
/-!
# Derivatives of power function on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`
We also prove differentiability and provide derivatives for the power functions `x ^ y`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Real Topology NNReal ENNReal
open Filter
namespace Complex
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p := by
have A : p.1 ≠ 0 := slitPlane_ne_zero hp
have : (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) :=
((isOpen_ne.preimage continuous_fst).eventually_mem A).mono fun p hp =>
cpow_def_of_ne_zero hp _
rw [cpow_sub _ _ A, cpow_one, mul_div_left_comm, mul_smul, mul_smul]
refine HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this.symm
simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero A, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_smul, add_comm, smul_add] using
((hasStrictFDerivAt_fst.clog hp).mul hasStrictFDerivAt_snd).cexp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow' {x y : ℂ} (hp : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((y * x ^ (y - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(x ^ y * log x) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) (x, y) :=
@hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (x, y) hp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow {x y : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => x ^ y) (x ^ y * log x) y := by
rcases em (x = 0) with (rfl | hx)
· replace h := h.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [log_zero, mul_zero]
refine (hasStrictDerivAt_const y 0).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
exact (isOpen_ne.eventually_mem h).mono fun y hy => (zero_cpow hy).symm
· simpa only [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_one] using
((hasStrictDerivAt_id y).const_mul (log x)).cexp
theorem hasFDerivAt_cpow {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp : p.1 ∈ slitPlane) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : ℂ × ℂ => x.1 ^ x.2)
((p.2 * p.1 ^ (p.2 - 1)) • ContinuousLinearMap.fst ℂ ℂ ℂ +
(p.1 ^ p.2 * log p.1) • ContinuousLinearMap.snd ℂ ℂ ℂ) p :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow hp).hasFDerivAt
end Complex
section fderiv
open Complex
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : E → ℂ} {f' g' : E →L[ℂ] ℂ}
{x : E} {s : Set E} {c : ℂ}
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_cpow (p := (f x, g x)) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp x (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • f' + (f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x)) • g') s x := by
convert (@Complex.hasFDerivAt_cpow ((fun x => (f x, g x)) x) h0).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prodMk hg)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) ((c ^ f x * Complex.log c) • f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℂ g x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivAt h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ g s x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ g x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg.hasFDerivWithinAt h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => c ^ f x) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_cpow h0).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ f s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s x :=
hf.cpow (differentiableWithinAt_const c) h0
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℂ g s)
(h0 : Set.MapsTo f s slitPlane) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).cpow (hg x hx) (h0 hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_cpow (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x hx)
theorem DifferentiableOn.cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s)
(h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ slitPlane) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun x => f x ^ c) s :=
hf.cpow (differentiableOn_const c) h0
theorem Differentiable.cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f) (hg : Differentiable ℂ g)
(h0 : ∀ x, f x ∈ slitPlane) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ f x ^ g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).cpow (hg x) (h0 x)
theorem Differentiable.const_cpow (hf : Differentiable ℂ f)
(h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Differentiable ℂ (fun x ↦ c ^ f x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf x).const_cpow (h0.imp_right fun h ↦ h x)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiable_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] :
Differentiable ℂ fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s :=
differentiable_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
@[fun_prop]
lemma differentiableAt_const_cpow_of_neZero (z : ℂ) [NeZero z] (t : ℂ) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s : ℂ ↦ z ^ s) t :=
differentiableAt_id.const_cpow (.inl <| NeZero.ne z)
end fderiv
section deriv
open Complex
variable {f g : ℂ → ℂ} {s : Set ℂ} {f' g' x c : ℂ}
/-- A private lemma that rewrites the output of lemmas like `HasFDerivAt.cpow` to the form
expected by lemmas like `HasDerivAt.cpow`. -/
private theorem aux : ((g x * f x ^ (g x - 1)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight f' +
(f x ^ g x * log (f x)) • (1 : ℂ →L[ℂ] ℂ).smulRight g') 1 =
g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * log (f x) * g' := by
simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, one_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul']
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa using (hf.cpow hg h0).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h).comp x hf
theorem Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const (h : x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun z : ℂ => z ^ c) (c * x ^ (c - 1)) x := by
simpa only [mul_zero, add_zero, mul_one] using
(hasStrictDerivAt_id x).cpow (hasStrictDerivAt_const x c) h
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ g x)
(g x * f x ^ (g x - 1) * f' + f x ^ g x * Complex.log (f x) * g') s x := by
simpa only [aux] using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.cpow hg h0).hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.const_cpow (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h0 : c ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => c ^ f x) (c ^ f x * Complex.log c * f') s x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_const_cpow h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.cpow_const (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h0 : f x ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ c) (c * f x ^ (c - 1) * f') s x :=
(Complex.hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const h0).hasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
/-- Although `fun x => x ^ r` for fixed `r` is *not* complex-differentiable along the negative real
line, it is still real-differentiable, and the derivative is what one would formally expect.
See `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const` for an alternate formulation. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ -1) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← Ne] at hr
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hx.symm with (hx | hx)
· -- easy case : `0 < x`
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (e := fun y => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1))
convert HasDerivAt.div_const (𝕜 := ℂ) ?_ (r + 1) using 1
· exact (mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr).symm
· convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, mul_comm]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
· -- harder case : `x < 0`
have : ∀ᶠ y : ℝ in 𝓝 x,
(y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) = (-y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) * exp (π * I * (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
refine Filter.eventually_of_mem (Iio_mem_nhds hx) fun y hy => ?_
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hy)]
refine HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this
rw [ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos (le_of_lt hx)]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-↑y) ^ (r + 1) * exp (↑π * I * (r + 1)))
((r + 1) * (-↑x) ^ r * exp (↑π * I * r)) x by
convert this.div_const (r + 1) using 1
conv_rhs => rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr]
rw [mul_add ((π : ℂ) * _), mul_one, exp_add, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) (-1 : ℂ),
neg_one_mul]
simp_rw [mul_neg, ← neg_mul, ← ofReal_neg]
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (↑(-y) : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) (-(r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) x by
convert this.neg.mul_const _ using 1; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) (-x) by
convert @HasDerivAt.scomp ℝ _ ℂ _ _ x ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this (hasDerivAt_neg x) using 1
rw [real_smul, ofReal_neg 1, ofReal_one]; ring
suffices HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ (r + 1)) ((r + 1) * ↑(-x) ^ r) ↑(-x) by
exact this.comp_ofReal
conv in ↑_ ^ _ => rw [(by ring : r = r + 1 - 1)]
convert HasDerivAt.cpow_const ?_ ?_ using 1
· rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right]; exact (mul_one _).symm
· exact hasDerivAt_id ((-x : ℝ) : ℂ)
· simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-15")] alias hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow := hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'
/-- An alternate formulation of `hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const'`. -/
theorem hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) {r : ℂ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ r) (r * x ^ (r - 1)) x := by
have := HasDerivAt.const_mul r <| hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' hx
(by rwa [ne_eq, sub_eq_neg_self])
simpa [sub_add_cancel, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr] using this
/-- A version of `DifferentiableAt.cpow_const` for a real function. -/
theorem DifferentiableAt.ofReal_cpow_const {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h0 : f x ≠ 0) (h1 : c ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun (y : ℝ) => (f y : ℂ) ^ c) x :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const h0 h1).differentiableAt.comp x hf
theorem Complex.deriv_cpow_const (hx : x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ x ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_cpow_const hx).hasDerivAt.deriv
/-- A version of `Complex.deriv_cpow_const` for a real variable. -/
theorem Complex.deriv_ofReal_cpow_const {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ c) x = c * x ^ (c - 1) :=
(hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc).deriv
theorem deriv_cpow_const (hf : DifferentiableAt ℂ f x) (hx : f x ∈ Complex.slitPlane) :
deriv (fun (x : ℂ) ↦ f x ^ c) x = c * f x ^ (c - 1) * deriv f x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.cpow_const hx).deriv
theorem isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =Θ[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
calc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ c * x ^ (c - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop 0] with x hx using by rw [deriv_ofReal_cpow_const hx hc]
_ =Θ[atTop] fun x : ℝ ↦ ‖(x : ℂ) ^ (c - 1)‖ :=
(Asymptotics.IsTheta.of_norm_eventuallyEq EventuallyEq.rfl).const_mul_left hc
_ =ᶠ[atTop] fun x ↦ x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with x hx
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re]
theorem isBigO_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop (c : ℂ) :
deriv (fun (x : ℝ) => (x : ℂ) ^ c) =O[atTop] fun x => x ^ (c.re - 1) := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· simp_rw [cpow_zero, deriv_const', Asymptotics.isBigO_zero]
| · exact (isTheta_deriv_ofReal_cpow_const_atTop hc).1
end deriv
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is strictly differentiable at `p : ℝ × ℝ` such that `0 < p.fst`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Deriv.lean | 305 | 313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Partial values of a type
This file defines `Part α`, the partial values of a type.
`o : Part α` carries a proposition `o.Dom`, its domain, along with a function `get : o.Dom → α`, its
value. The rule is then that every partial value has a value but, to access it, you need to provide
a proof of the domain.
`Part α` behaves the same as `Option α` except that `o : Option α` is decidably `none` or `some a`
for some `a : α`, while the domain of `o : Part α` doesn't have to be decidable. That means you can
translate back and forth between a partial value with a decidable domain and an option, and
`Option α` and `Part α` are classically equivalent. In general, `Part α` is bigger than `Option α`.
In current mathlib, `Part ℕ`, aka `PartENat`, is used to move decidability of the order to
decidability of `PartENat.find` (which is the smallest natural satisfying a predicate, or `∞` if
there's none).
## Main declarations
`Option`-like declarations:
* `Part.none`: The partial value whose domain is `False`.
* `Part.some a`: The partial value whose domain is `True` and whose value is `a`.
* `Part.ofOption`: Converts an `Option α` to a `Part α` by sending `none` to `none` and `some a` to
`some a`.
* `Part.toOption`: Converts a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an `Option α`.
* `Part.equivOption`: Classical equivalence between `Part α` and `Option α`.
Monadic structure:
* `Part.bind`: `o.bind f` has value `(f (o.get _)).get _` (`f o` morally) and is defined when `o`
and `f (o.get _)` are defined.
* `Part.map`: Maps the value and keeps the same domain.
Other:
* `Part.restrict`: `Part.restrict p o` replaces the domain of `o : Part α` by `p : Prop` so long as
`p → o.Dom`.
* `Part.assert`: `assert p f` appends `p` to the domains of the values of a partial function.
* `Part.unwrap`: Gets the value of a partial value regardless of its domain. Unsound.
## Notation
For `a : α`, `o : Part α`, `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a`. Formally, it means
`o.Dom` and `o.get _ = a`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
/-- `Part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `Option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
/-- The domain of a partial value -/
Dom : Prop
/-- Extract a value from a partial value given a proof of `Dom` -/
get : Dom → α
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
@[simp] lemma toOption_eq_none (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption = none ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
/-- `Part` eta expansion -/
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def Mem (o : Part α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `Part` has a `False` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `Part` has a `True` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
theorem mem_right_unique : ∀ {a : α} {o p : Part α}, a ∈ o → a ∈ p → o = p
| _, _, _, ⟨ho, _⟩, ⟨hp, _⟩ => ext' (iff_of_true ho hp) (by simp [*])
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
theorem Mem.right_unique : Relator.RightUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_right_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : Part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
-- `simp`-normal form is `toOption_eq_some_iff`.
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
@[simp]
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
/-- Converts an `Option α` into a `Part α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
/-- `Part α` is (classically) equivalent to `Option α`. -/
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
/-- We give `Part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ f g _ := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm _ _ f g := Part.ext fun _ => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
/-- The map operation for `Part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· simp
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (fun y => some (f y)) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
simp [map, Function.comp_assoc]
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
rw [bind_some_eq_map]
simp [map_id']
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
-- TODO: if `MonadFail` is defined, define the below instance.
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
o.get lcProof
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ h : p, (f h).Dom → (assert p f).Dom :=
Exists.intro
theorem bind_defined {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} :
∀ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom → (f.bind g).Dom :=
assert_defined
@[simp]
theorem bind_dom {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : (f.bind g).Dom ↔ ∃ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
section Instances
/-!
We define several instances for constants and operations on `Part α` inherited from `α`.
This section could be moved to a separate file to avoid the import of `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs`.
-/
@[to_additive]
instance [One α] : One (Part α) where one := pure 1
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul α] : Mul (Part α) where mul a b := (· * ·) <$> a <*> b
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] : Inv (Part α) where inv := map Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
instance [Div α] : Div (Part α) where div a b := (· / ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Mod α] : Mod (Part α) where mod a b := (· % ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Append α] : Append (Part α) where append a b := (· ++ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Inter α] : Inter (Part α) where inter a b := (· ∩ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Union α] : Union (Part α) where union a b := (· ∪ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [SDiff α] : SDiff (Part α) where sdiff a b := (· \ ·) <$> a <*> b
section
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_def [Mul α] (a b : Part α) : a * b = bind a fun y ↦ map (y * ·) b := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem one_def [One α] : (1 : Part α) = some 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_def [Inv α] (a : Part α) : a⁻¹ = Part.map (· ⁻¹) a := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_def [Div α] (a b : Part α) : a / b = bind a fun y => map (y / ·) b := rfl
theorem mod_def [Mod α] (a b : Part α) : a % b = bind a fun y => map (y % ·) b := rfl
theorem append_def [Append α] (a b : Part α) : a ++ b = bind a fun y => map (y ++ ·) b := rfl
theorem inter_def [Inter α] (a b : Part α) : a ∩ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∩ ·) b := rfl
theorem union_def [Union α] (a b : Part α) : a ∪ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∪ ·) b := rfl
theorem sdiff_def [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) : a \ b = bind a fun y => map (y \ ·) b := rfl
end
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one [One α] : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Part α) :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma * mb ∈ a * b := ⟨⟨ha.1, hb.1⟩, by simp only [← ha.2, ← hb.2]; rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_get_eq [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a * b)) :
(a * b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mul_dom hab) * b.get (right_dom_of_mul_dom hab) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem some_mul_some [Mul α] (a b : α) : some a * some b = some (a * b) := by simp [mul_def]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv [Inv α] (a : Part α) (ma : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) : ma⁻¹ ∈ a⁻¹ := by
simp [inv_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_some [Inv α] (a : α) : (some a)⁻¹ = some a⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div [Div α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma / mb ∈ a / b := by simp [div_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_get_eq [Div α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a / b)) :
(a / b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_div_dom hab) / b.get (right_dom_of_div_dom hab) := by
simp [div_def]; aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem some_div_some [Div α] (a b : α) : some a / some b = some (a / b) := by simp [div_def]
theorem mod_mem_mod [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma % mb ∈ a % b := by simp [mod_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem mod_get_eq [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a % b)) :
(a % b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mod_dom hab) % b.get (right_dom_of_mod_dom hab) := by
simp [mod_def]; aesop
theorem some_mod_some [Mod α] (a b : α) : some a % some b = some (a % b) := by simp [mod_def]
theorem append_mem_append [Append α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ++ mb ∈ a ++ b := by simp [append_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem append_get_eq [Append α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : (a ++ b).get hab =
a.get (left_dom_of_append_dom hab) ++ b.get (right_dom_of_append_dom hab) := by
simp [append_def]; aesop
theorem some_append_some [Append α] (a b : α) : some a ++ some b = some (a ++ b) := by
simp [append_def]
theorem inter_mem_inter [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∩ mb ∈ a ∩ b := by simp [inter_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem inter_get_eq [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) :
(a ∩ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_inter_dom hab) ∩ b.get (right_dom_of_inter_dom hab) := by
simp [inter_def]; aesop
theorem some_inter_some [Inter α] (a b : α) : some a ∩ some b = some (a ∩ b) := by
simp [inter_def]
theorem union_mem_union [Union α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∪ mb ∈ a ∪ b := by simp [union_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem union_get_eq [Union α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) :
(a ∪ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_union_dom hab) ∪ b.get (right_dom_of_union_dom hab) := by
simp [union_def]; aesop
theorem some_union_some [Union α] (a b : α) : some a ∪ some b = some (a ∪ b) := by simp [union_def]
theorem sdiff_mem_sdiff [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma \ mb ∈ a \ b := by simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
theorem left_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
theorem right_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_get_eq [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a \ b)) :
(a \ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) \ b.get (right_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) := by
simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
theorem some_sdiff_some [SDiff α] (a b : α) : some a \ some b = some (a \ b) := by simp [sdiff_def]
end Instances
end Part
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 855 | 857 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
| theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 275 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Order.Birkhoff
import Mathlib.Order.Booleanisation
import Mathlib.Order.Sublattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# The four functions theorem and corollaries
This file proves the four functions theorem. The statement is that if
`f₁ a * f₂ b ≤ f₃ (a ⊓ b) * f₄ (a ⊔ b)` for all `a`, `b` in a finite distributive lattice, then
`(∑ x ∈ s, f₁ x) * (∑ x ∈ t, f₂ x) ≤ (∑ x ∈ s ⊼ t, f₃ x) * (∑ x ∈ s ⊻ t, f₄ x)` where
`s ⊼ t = {a ⊓ b | a ∈ s, b ∈ t}`, `s ⊻ t = {a ⊔ b | a ∈ s, b ∈ t}`.
The proof uses Birkhoff's representation theorem to restrict to the case where the finite
distributive lattice is in fact a finite powerset algebra, namely `Finset α` for some finite `α`.
Then it proves this new statement by induction on the size of `α`.
## Main declarations
The two versions of the four functions theorem are
* `Finset.four_functions_theorem` for finite powerset algebras.
* `four_functions_theorem` for any finite distributive lattices.
We deduce a number of corollaries:
* `Finset.le_card_infs_mul_card_sups`: Daykin inequality. `|s| |t| ≤ |s ⊼ t| |s ⊻ t|`
* `holley`: Holley inequality.
* `fkg`: Fortuin-Kastelyn-Ginibre inequality.
* `Finset.card_le_card_diffs`: Marica-Schönheim inequality. `|s| ≤ |{a \ b | a, b ∈ s}|`
## TODO
Prove that lattices in which `Finset.le_card_infs_mul_card_sups` holds are distributive. See
Daykin, *A lattice is distributive iff |A| |B| <= |A ∨ B| |A ∧ B|*
Prove the Fishburn-Shepp inequality.
Is `collapse` a construct generally useful for set family inductions? If so, we should move it to an
earlier file and give it a proper API.
## References
[*Applications of the FKG Inequality and Its Relatives*, Graham][Graham1983]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function
open scoped FinsetFamily
variable {α β : Type*}
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α] [CommSemiring β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β]
{𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {a : α} {f f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄ : Finset α → β} {s t u : Finset α}
/-- The `n = 1` case of the Ahlswede-Daykin inequality. Note that we can't just expand everything
out and bound termwise since `c₀ * d₁` appears twice on the RHS of the assumptions while `c₁ * d₀`
does not appear. -/
private lemma ineq [ExistsAddOfLE β] {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ c₀ c₁ d₀ d₁ : β}
(ha₀ : 0 ≤ a₀) (ha₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (hb₀ : 0 ≤ b₀) (hb₁ : 0 ≤ b₁)
(hc₀ : 0 ≤ c₀) (hc₁ : 0 ≤ c₁) (hd₀ : 0 ≤ d₀) (hd₁ : 0 ≤ d₁)
(h₀₀ : a₀ * b₀ ≤ c₀ * d₀) (h₁₀ : a₁ * b₀ ≤ c₀ * d₁)
(h₀₁ : a₀ * b₁ ≤ c₀ * d₁) (h₁₁ : a₁ * b₁ ≤ c₁ * d₁) :
(a₀ + a₁) * (b₀ + b₁) ≤ (c₀ + c₁) * (d₀ + d₁) := by
calc
_ = a₀ * b₀ + (a₀ * b₁ + a₁ * b₀) + a₁ * b₁ := by ring
_ ≤ c₀ * d₀ + (c₀ * d₁ + c₁ * d₀) + c₁ * d₁ := add_le_add_three h₀₀ ?_ h₁₁
_ = (c₀ + c₁) * (d₀ + d₁) := by ring
obtain hcd | hcd := (mul_nonneg hc₀ hd₁).eq_or_gt
· rw [hcd] at h₀₁ h₁₀
rw [h₀₁.antisymm, h₁₀.antisymm, add_zero] <;> positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ hcd
calc (a₀ * b₁ + a₁ * b₀) * (c₀ * d₁)
= a₀ * b₁ * (c₀ * d₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (a₁ * b₀) := by ring
_ ≤ a₀ * b₁ * (a₁ * b₀) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) := mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul h₀₁ h₁₀
_ = a₀ * b₀ * (a₁ * b₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) := by ring
_ ≤ c₀ * d₀ * (c₁ * d₁) + c₀ * d₁ * (c₀ * d₁) :=
add_le_add_right (mul_le_mul h₀₀ h₁₁ (by positivity) <| by positivity) _
_ = (c₀ * d₁ + c₁ * d₀) * (c₀ * d₁) := by ring
private def collapse (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) (f : Finset α → β) (s : Finset α) : β :=
∑ t ∈ 𝒜 with t.erase a = s, f t
private lemma erase_eq_iff (hs : a ∉ s) : t.erase a = s ↔ t = s ∨ t = insert a s := by
by_cases ht : a ∈ t <;>
· simp [ne_of_mem_of_not_mem', erase_eq_iff_eq_insert, *]
aesop
private lemma filter_collapse_eq (ha : a ∉ s) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
{t ∈ 𝒜 | t.erase a = s} =
if s ∈ 𝒜 then
(if insert a s ∈ 𝒜 then {s, insert a s} else {s})
else
(if insert a s ∈ 𝒜 then {insert a s} else ∅) := by
ext t; split_ifs <;> simp [erase_eq_iff ha] <;> aesop
omit [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] in
lemma collapse_eq (ha : a ∉ s) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (f : Finset α → β) :
collapse 𝒜 a f s = (if s ∈ 𝒜 then f s else 0) +
if insert a s ∈ 𝒜 then f (insert a s) else 0 := by
rw [collapse, filter_collapse_eq ha]
split_ifs <;> simp [(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' (mem_insert_self a s) ha).symm, *]
omit [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] in
lemma collapse_of_mem (ha : a ∉ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝒜) (hu : u ∈ 𝒜) (hts : t = s)
(hus : u = insert a s) : collapse 𝒜 a f s = f t + f u := by
subst hts; subst hus; simp_rw [collapse_eq ha, if_pos ht, if_pos hu]
lemma le_collapse_of_mem (ha : a ∉ s) (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hts : t = s) (ht : t ∈ 𝒜) :
f t ≤ collapse 𝒜 a f s := by
subst hts
rw [collapse_eq ha, if_pos ht]
split_ifs
· exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| hf _
· rw [add_zero]
lemma le_collapse_of_insert_mem (ha : a ∉ s) (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hts : t = insert a s) (ht : t ∈ 𝒜) :
f t ≤ collapse 𝒜 a f s := by
rw [collapse_eq ha, ← hts, if_pos ht]
split_ifs
· exact le_add_of_nonneg_left <| hf _
· rw [zero_add]
lemma collapse_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ collapse 𝒜 a f := fun _s ↦ sum_nonneg fun _t _ ↦ hf _
lemma collapse_modular [ExistsAddOfLE β]
(hu : a ∉ u) (h₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₃ : 0 ≤ f₃) (h₄ : 0 ≤ f₄)
(h : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ⊆ insert a u → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ insert a u → f₁ s * f₂ t ≤ f₃ (s ∩ t) * f₄ (s ∪ t))
(𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
∀ ⦃s⦄, s ⊆ u → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ u → collapse 𝒜 a f₁ s * collapse ℬ a f₂ t ≤
collapse (𝒜 ⊼ ℬ) a f₃ (s ∩ t) * collapse (𝒜 ⊻ ℬ) a f₄ (s ∪ t) := by
rintro s hsu t htu
-- Gather a bunch of facts we'll need a lot
have := hsu.trans <| subset_insert a _
have := htu.trans <| subset_insert a _
have := insert_subset_insert a hsu
have := insert_subset_insert a htu
have has := not_mem_mono hsu hu
have hat := not_mem_mono htu hu
have : a ∉ s ∩ t := not_mem_mono (inter_subset_left.trans hsu) hu
have := not_mem_union.2 ⟨has, hat⟩
rw [collapse_eq has]
split_ifs
· rw [collapse_eq hat]
split_ifs
· rw [collapse_of_mem ‹_› (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) rfl
(insert_inter_distrib _ _ _).symm, collapse_of_mem ‹_› (union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›)
(union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) rfl (insert_union_distrib _ _ _).symm]
refine ineq (h₁ _) (h₁ _) (h₂ _) (h₂ _) (h₃ _) (h₃ _) (h₄ _) (h₄ _) (h ‹_› ‹_›) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa [*] using h ‹insert a s ⊆ _› ‹t ⊆ _›
· simpa [*] using h ‹s ⊆ _› ‹insert a t ⊆ _›
· simpa [*] using h ‹insert a s ⊆ _› ‹insert a t ⊆ _›
· rw [add_zero, add_mul]
refine (add_le_add (h ‹_› ‹_›) <| h ‹_› ‹_›).trans ?_
rw [collapse_of_mem ‹_› (union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) (union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) rfl
(insert_union _ _ _), insert_inter_of_not_mem ‹_›, ← mul_add]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_collapse_of_mem ‹_› h₃ rfl <| inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) <|
add_nonneg (h₄ _) <| h₄ _
· rw [zero_add, add_mul]
refine (add_le_add (h ‹_› ‹_›) <| h ‹_› ‹_›).trans ?_
rw [collapse_of_mem ‹_› (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›)
(inter_insert_of_not_mem ‹_›) (insert_inter_distrib _ _ _).symm, union_insert,
insert_union_distrib, ← add_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_› h₄
(insert_union_distrib _ _ _).symm <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) <| add_nonneg (h₃ _) <| h₃ _
· rw [add_zero, mul_zero]
exact mul_nonneg (collapse_nonneg h₃ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₄ _
· rw [add_zero, collapse_eq hat, mul_add]
split_ifs
· refine (add_le_add (h ‹_› ‹_›) <| h ‹_› ‹_›).trans ?_
rw [collapse_of_mem ‹_› (union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) (union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) rfl
(union_insert _ _ _), inter_insert_of_not_mem ‹_›, ← mul_add]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_collapse_of_mem ‹_› h₃ rfl <| inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) <|
add_nonneg (h₄ _) <| h₄ _
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
exact (h ‹_› ‹_›).trans <| mul_le_mul (le_collapse_of_mem ‹_› h₃ rfl <|
inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (le_collapse_of_mem ‹_› h₄ rfl <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›)
(h₄ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₃ _
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
refine (h ‹_› ‹_›).trans <| mul_le_mul ?_ (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_› h₄
(union_insert _ _ _) <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) (h₄ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₃ _
exact le_collapse_of_mem (not_mem_mono inter_subset_left ‹_›) h₃
(inter_insert_of_not_mem ‹_›) <| inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›
· simp_rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
exact mul_nonneg (collapse_nonneg h₃ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₄ _
· rw [zero_add, collapse_eq hat, mul_add]
split_ifs
· refine (add_le_add (h ‹_› ‹_›) <| h ‹_› ‹_›).trans ?_
rw [collapse_of_mem ‹_› (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›)
(insert_inter_of_not_mem ‹_›) (insert_inter_distrib _ _ _).symm,
insert_inter_of_not_mem ‹_›, ← insert_inter_distrib, insert_union, insert_union_distrib,
← add_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_› h₄
(insert_union_distrib _ _ _).symm <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) <| add_nonneg (h₃ _) <| h₃ _
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
refine (h ‹_› ‹_›).trans <| mul_le_mul (le_collapse_of_mem ‹_› h₃
(insert_inter_of_not_mem ‹_›) <| inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_› h₄
(insert_union _ _ _) <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) (h₄ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₃ _
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
exact (h ‹_› ‹_›).trans <| mul_le_mul (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_› h₃
(insert_inter_distrib _ _ _).symm <| inter_mem_infs ‹_› ‹_›) (le_collapse_of_insert_mem ‹_›
h₄ (insert_union_distrib _ _ _).symm <| union_mem_sups ‹_› ‹_›) (h₄ _) <|
collapse_nonneg h₃ _
· simp_rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
exact mul_nonneg (collapse_nonneg h₃ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₄ _
· simp_rw [add_zero, zero_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (collapse_nonneg h₃ _) <| collapse_nonneg h₄ _
omit [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β] in
lemma sum_collapse (h𝒜 : 𝒜 ⊆ (insert a u).powerset) (hu : a ∉ u) :
∑ s ∈ u.powerset, collapse 𝒜 a f s = ∑ s ∈ 𝒜, f s := by
calc
_ = ∑ s ∈ u.powerset ∩ 𝒜, f s + ∑ s ∈ u.powerset.image (insert a) ∩ 𝒜, f s := ?_
_ = ∑ s ∈ u.powerset ∩ 𝒜, f s + ∑ s ∈ ((insert a u).powerset \ u.powerset) ∩ 𝒜, f s := ?_
_ = ∑ s ∈ 𝒜, f s := ?_
· rw [← Finset.sum_ite_mem, ← Finset.sum_ite_mem, sum_image, ← sum_add_distrib]
· exact sum_congr rfl fun s hs ↦ collapse_eq (not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 hs) hu) _ _
· exact (insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn).mono fun s hs ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 hs) hu
· congr with s
simp only [mem_image, mem_powerset, mem_sdiff, subset_insert_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h.1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
exact ⟨subset_insert_iff.1 <| insert_subset_insert _ hs, fun h ↦
hu <| h <| mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· rw [insert_erase (erase_ne_self.1 fun hs ↦ ?_)]
rw [hs] at h
exact h.2 h.1
· rw [← sum_union (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left),
← union_inter_distrib_right, union_sdiff_of_subset (powerset_mono.2 <| subset_insert _ _),
inter_eq_right.2 h𝒜]
variable [ExistsAddOfLE β]
/-- The **Four Functions Theorem** on a powerset algebra. See `four_functions_theorem` for the
finite distributive lattice generalisation. -/
protected lemma Finset.four_functions_theorem (u : Finset α)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₃ : 0 ≤ f₃) (h₄ : 0 ≤ f₄)
(h : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ⊆ u → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ u → f₁ s * f₂ t ≤ f₃ (s ∩ t) * f₄ (s ∪ t))
{𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} (h𝒜 : 𝒜 ⊆ u.powerset) (hℬ : ℬ ⊆ u.powerset) :
(∑ s ∈ 𝒜, f₁ s) * ∑ s ∈ ℬ, f₂ s ≤ (∑ s ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ, f₃ s) * ∑ s ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ, f₄ s := by
induction u using Finset.induction generalizing f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄ 𝒜 ℬ with
| empty =>
simp only [Finset.powerset_empty, Finset.subset_singleton_iff] at h𝒜 hℬ
obtain rfl | rfl := h𝒜 <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hℬ <;> simp; exact h (subset_refl ∅) subset_rfl
| insert a u hu ih =>
specialize ih (collapse_nonneg h₁) (collapse_nonneg h₂) (collapse_nonneg h₃)
(collapse_nonneg h₄) (collapse_modular hu h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h 𝒜 ℬ) Subset.rfl Subset.rfl
have : 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ ⊆ powerset (insert a u) := by simpa using infs_subset h𝒜 hℬ
have : 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ ⊆ powerset (insert a u) := by simpa using sups_subset h𝒜 hℬ
simpa only [powerset_sups_powerset_self, powerset_infs_powerset_self, sum_collapse,
not_false_eq_true, *] using ih
variable (f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄) [Fintype α]
private lemma four_functions_theorem_aux (h₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₃ : 0 ≤ f₃) (h₄ : 0 ≤ f₄)
(h : ∀ s t, f₁ s * f₂ t ≤ f₃ (s ∩ t) * f₄ (s ∪ t)) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(∑ s ∈ 𝒜, f₁ s) * ∑ s ∈ ℬ, f₂ s ≤ (∑ s ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ, f₃ s) * ∑ s ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ, f₄ s := by
refine univ.four_functions_theorem h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [h]
end Finset
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [CommSemiring β] [LinearOrder β] [IsStrictOrderedRing β]
[ExistsAddOfLE β] (f f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄ g μ : α → β)
/-- The **Four Functions Theorem**, aka **Ahlswede-Daykin Inequality**. -/
lemma four_functions_theorem [DecidableEq α] (h₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₃ : 0 ≤ f₃) (h₄ : 0 ≤ f₄)
(h : ∀ a b, f₁ a * f₂ b ≤ f₃ (a ⊓ b) * f₄ (a ⊔ b)) (s t : Finset α) :
(∑ a ∈ s, f₁ a) * ∑ a ∈ t, f₂ a ≤ (∑ a ∈ s ⊼ t, f₃ a) * ∑ a ∈ s ⊻ t, f₄ a := by
classical
set L : Sublattice α := ⟨latticeClosure (s ∪ t), isSublattice_latticeClosure.1,
isSublattice_latticeClosure.2⟩
have : Finite L := (s.finite_toSet.union t.finite_toSet).latticeClosure.to_subtype
set s' : Finset L := s.preimage (↑) Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
set t' : Finset L := t.preimage (↑) Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
have hs' : s'.map ⟨L.subtype, Subtype.coe_injective⟩ = s := by
simp [s', map_eq_image, image_preimage, filter_eq_self]
exact fun a ha ↦ subset_latticeClosure <| Set.subset_union_left ha
have ht' : t'.map ⟨L.subtype, Subtype.coe_injective⟩ = t := by
simp [t', map_eq_image, image_preimage, filter_eq_self]
exact fun a ha ↦ subset_latticeClosure <| Set.subset_union_right ha
clear_value s' t'
obtain ⟨β, _, _, g, hg⟩ := exists_birkhoff_representation L
have := four_functions_theorem_aux (extend g (f₁ ∘ (↑)) 0) (extend g (f₂ ∘ (↑)) 0)
(extend g (f₃ ∘ (↑)) 0) (extend g (f₄ ∘ (↑)) 0) (extend_nonneg (fun _ ↦ h₁ _) le_rfl)
(extend_nonneg (fun _ ↦ h₂ _) le_rfl) (extend_nonneg (fun _ ↦ h₃ _) le_rfl)
(extend_nonneg (fun _ ↦ h₄ _) le_rfl) ?_ (s'.map ⟨g, hg⟩) (t'.map ⟨g, hg⟩)
· simpa only [← hs', ← ht', ← map_sups, ← map_infs, sum_map, Embedding.coeFn_mk, hg.extend_apply]
using this
rintro s t
classical
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | hs := em (∃ a, g a = s)
· obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ | ht := em (∃ b, g b = t)
· simp_rw [← sup_eq_union, ← inf_eq_inter, ← map_sup, ← map_inf, hg.extend_apply]
exact h _ _
· simpa [extend_apply' _ _ _ ht] using mul_nonneg
(extend_nonneg (fun a : L ↦ h₃ a) le_rfl _) (extend_nonneg (fun a : L ↦ h₄ a) le_rfl _)
· simpa [extend_apply' _ _ _ hs] using mul_nonneg
(extend_nonneg (fun a : L ↦ h₃ a) le_rfl _) (extend_nonneg (fun a : L ↦ h₄ a) le_rfl _)
/-- An inequality of Daykin. Interestingly, any lattice in which this inequality holds is
distributive. -/
lemma Finset.le_card_infs_mul_card_sups [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) :
#s * #t ≤ #(s ⊼ t) * #(s ⊻ t) := by
simpa using four_functions_theorem (1 : α → ℕ) 1 1 1 zero_le_one zero_le_one zero_le_one
zero_le_one (fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl) s t
variable [Fintype α]
/-- Special case of the **Four Functions Theorem** when `s = t = univ`. -/
lemma four_functions_theorem_univ (h₁ : 0 ≤ f₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ f₂) (h₃ : 0 ≤ f₃) (h₄ : 0 ≤ f₄)
(h : ∀ a b, f₁ a * f₂ b ≤ f₃ (a ⊓ b) * f₄ (a ⊔ b)) :
(∑ a, f₁ a) * ∑ a, f₂ a ≤ (∑ a, f₃ a) * ∑ a, f₄ a := by
classical simpa using four_functions_theorem f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h univ univ
/-- The **Holley Inequality**. -/
lemma holley (hμ₀ : 0 ≤ μ) (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hg : 0 ≤ g) (hμ : Monotone μ)
(hfg : ∑ a, f a = ∑ a, g a) (h : ∀ a b, f a * g b ≤ f (a ⊓ b) * g (a ⊔ b)) :
∑ a, μ a * f a ≤ ∑ a, μ a * g a := by
classical
obtain rfl | hf := hf.eq_or_lt
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sum_const_zero, eq_comm, Fintype.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hg] at hfg
simp [hfg]
obtain rfl | hg := hg.eq_or_lt
· simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sum_const_zero, Fintype.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hf.le] at hfg
| simp [hfg]
have := four_functions_theorem g (μ * f) f (μ * g) hg.le (mul_nonneg hμ₀ hf.le) hf.le
(mul_nonneg hμ₀ hg.le) (fun a b ↦ ?_) univ univ
· simpa [hfg, sum_pos hg] using this
· simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, mul_left_comm _ (μ _), mul_comm (g _)]
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm]
exact mul_le_mul (hμ le_sup_left) (h _ _) (mul_nonneg (hf.le _) <| hg.le _) <| hμ₀ _
/-- The **Fortuin-Kastelyn-Ginibre Inequality**. -/
lemma fkg (hμ₀ : 0 ≤ μ) (hf₀ : 0 ≤ f) (hg₀ : 0 ≤ g) (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g)
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/FourFunctions.lean | 335 | 344 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Dylan MacKenzie, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Ring.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Bounds
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.ModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file contains important specific limit computations in (semi-)normed groups/rings/spaces, as
well as such computations in `ℝ` when the natural proof passes through a fact about normed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Asymptotics Topology Nat NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂
(isLittleO_of_tendsto fun _ hn ↦ False.elim <| H.ne' <| pow_eq_zero hn) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
(div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr fun _ ↦ div_pow _ _ _
theorem isBigO_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h ↦ h ▸ isBigO_refl _ _) fun h ↦ (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).isBigO
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
(fun n : ℕ ↦ r₁ ^ n) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
refine (IsLittleO.of_norm_left ?_).of_norm_right
exact (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
open List in
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
theorem TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
TFAE
[∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =o[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·), ∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, f =O[atTop] (a ^ ·),
∃ a < R, ∃ C : ℝ, (0 < C ∨ 0 < R) ∧ ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n, ∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in atTop, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] := by
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have 1 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
tfae_have 3 → 2
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩
tfae_have 2 → 4 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, H.isBigO⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, B ha, H⟩
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have 4 → 6
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
rcases bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le] using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne')
tfae_have 6 → 5 := fun ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, C, Or.inl H₀, H⟩
tfae_have 5 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩ => by
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n) with (rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩)
· obtain rfl : f = 0 := by
ext n
simpa using H n
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, isBigO_zero _ _⟩
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
isBigO_of_le' _ fun n ↦ (H n).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le⟩
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have 2 → 8
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn
tfae_have 8 → 7 := fun ⟨a, ha, H⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩
tfae_have 7 → 3
| ⟨a, ha, H⟩ => by
refine ⟨a, A ⟨?_, ha⟩, .of_norm_eventuallyLE H⟩
exact nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono fun n ↦ (abs_nonneg _).trans)
tfae_finish
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 1 < r) : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
have : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ ↦ x ^ k) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le
suffices (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =O[atTop] fun n : ℕ ↦ (r' ^ k) ^ n from
this.trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr')
conv in (r' ^ _) ^ _ => rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul]
suffices ∀ n : ℕ, ‖(n : R)‖ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ‖(1 : R)‖ * ‖r' ^ n‖ from
(isBigO_of_le' _ this).pow _
intro n
rw [mul_right_comm]
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _))
simpa [_root_.div_eq_inv_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
((↑) : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r ^ n := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt R _ 1 _ hr
/-- If `‖r₁‖ < r₂`, then for any natural `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ‖r₁‖ < r₂) :
(fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ r₂ ^ n := by
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0
· refine (isLittleO_zero _ _).congr' (mem_atTop_sets.2 <| ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩) EventuallyEq.rfl
simp [zero_pow (one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 hn), h0]
rw [← Ne, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0
have A : (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k : ℕ → R) =o[atTop] fun n ↦ (r₂ / ‖r₁‖) ^ n :=
isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h)
suffices (fun n ↦ r₁ ^ n) =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ‖r₁‖ ^ n by
simpa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne', div_pow] using A.mul_isBigO this
exact .of_norm_eventuallyLE <| eventually_norm_pow_le r₁
theorem tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_div_nhds_zero
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases h0 : r = 0
· exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨1, fun n hn ↦ by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn |>.ne', h0]⟩)
have hr' : 1 < |r|⁻¹ := (one_lt_inv₀ (abs_pos.2 h0)).2 hr
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
/-- For `k ≠ 0` and a constant `r` the function `r / n ^ k` tends to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_const_div_pow (r : ℝ) (k : ℕ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r / n ^ k) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using Filter.Tendsto.const_div_atTop (tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop (R := ℝ).comp
(tendsto_pow_atTop hk) ) r
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`.
This is a specialized version of `tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out
for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ (n : ℝ) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one k (abs_lt.2 ⟨neg_one_lt_zero.trans_le hr, h'r⟩)
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one 1 hr
/-- If `0 ≤ r < 1`, then `n * r ^ n` tends to zero. This is a specialized version of
`tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one`, singled out for ease of application. -/
theorem tendsto_self_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (h'r : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [pow_one] using tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_lt_one 1 hr h'r
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `‖x‖ < 1` tend to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] {x : R}
(h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h
lemma tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff_norm_lt_one {R : Type*} [SeminormedRing R] [NormMulClass R]
{x : R} : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ‖x‖ < 1 := by
-- this proof is slightly fiddly since `‖x ^ n‖ = ‖x‖ ^ n` might not hold for `n = 0`
refine ⟨?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one⟩
rw [← abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff,
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
apply Tendsto.congr'
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop 1] with n hn
induction n, hn using Nat.le_induction with
| base => simp
| succ n hn IH => simp [norm_pow, pow_succ, IH]
/-! ### Geometric series -/
/-- A normed ring has summable geometric series if, for all `ξ` of norm `< 1`, the geometric series
`∑ ξ ^ n` converges. This holds both in complete normed rings and in normed fields, providing a
convenient abstraction of these two classes to avoid repeating the same proofs. -/
class HasSummableGeomSeries (K : Type*) [NormedRing K] : Prop where
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one : ∀ (ξ : K), ‖ξ‖ < 1 → Summable (fun n ↦ ξ ^ n)
lemma summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {K : Type*} [NormedRing K] [HasSummableGeomSeries K]
{x : K} (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : Summable (fun n ↦ x ^ n) :=
HasSummableGeomSeries.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one x h
instance {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] [CompleteSpace R] : HasSummableGeomSeries R := by
constructor
intro x hx
have h1 : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖x‖ ^ n := summable_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) hx
exact h1.of_norm_bounded_eventually_nat _ (eventually_norm_pow_le x)
section HasSummableGeometricSeries
variable {R : Type*} [NormedRing R]
open NormedSpace
/-- Bound for the sum of a geometric series in a normed ring. This formula does not assume that the
normed ring satisfies the axiom `‖1‖ = 1`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_le_of_norm_lt_one (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
‖∑' n : ℕ, x ^ n‖ ≤ ‖(1 : R)‖ - 1 + (1 - ‖x‖)⁻¹ := by
by_cases hx : Summable (fun n ↦ x ^ n)
· rw [hx.tsum_eq_zero_add]
simp only [_root_.pow_zero]
refine le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) ?_
have : ‖∑' b : ℕ, (fun n ↦ x ^ (n + 1)) b‖ ≤ (1 - ‖x‖)⁻¹ - 1 := by
refine tsum_of_norm_bounded ?_ fun b ↦ norm_pow_le' _ (Nat.succ_pos b)
convert (hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr (hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg x) h)
simp
linarith
· simp [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hx]
nontriviality R
have : 1 ≤ ‖(1 : R)‖ := one_le_norm_one R
have : 0 ≤ (1 - ‖x‖) ⁻¹ := inv_nonneg.2 (by linarith)
linarith
variable [HasSummableGeomSeries R]
theorem geom_series_mul_neg (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : (∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 := by
have := (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum.mul_right (1 - x)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat ?_
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 - x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h)
convert← this
rw [← geom_sum_mul_neg, Finset.sum_mul]
theorem mul_neg_geom_series (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : (1 - x) * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = 1 := by
have := (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum.mul_left (1 - x)
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat ?_
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 - x ^ n) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h)
convert← this
rw [← mul_neg_geom_sum, Finset.mul_sum]
theorem geom_series_succ (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ (i + 1) = ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_eq_zero_add,
pow_zero, add_comm]
theorem geom_series_mul_shift (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
x * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ (i + 1) := by
simp_rw [← (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_mul_left, ← _root_.pow_succ']
theorem geom_series_mul_one_add (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
(1 + x) * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i = 2 * ∑' i : ℕ, x ^ i - 1 := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul, geom_series_mul_shift x h, geom_series_succ x h, two_mul, add_sub_assoc]
/-- In a normed ring with summable geometric series, a perturbation of `1` by an element `t`
of distance less than `1` from `1` is a unit. Here we construct its `Units` structure. -/
@[simps val]
def Units.oneSub (t : R) (h : ‖t‖ < 1) : Rˣ where
val := 1 - t
inv := ∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n
val_inv := mul_neg_geom_series t h
inv_val := geom_series_mul_neg t h
theorem geom_series_eq_inverse (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
∑' i, x ^ i = Ring.inverse (1 - x) := by
change (Units.oneSub x h) ⁻¹ = Ring.inverse (1 - x)
rw [← Ring.inverse_unit]
rfl
theorem hasSum_geom_series_inverse (x : R) (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun i ↦ x ^ i) (Ring.inverse (1 - x)) := by
convert (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).hasSum
exact (geom_series_eq_inverse x h).symm
lemma isUnit_one_sub_of_norm_lt_one {x : R} (h : ‖x‖ < 1) : IsUnit (1 - x) :=
⟨Units.oneSub x h, rfl⟩
end HasSummableGeometricSeries
section Geometric
variable {K : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing K] {ξ : K}
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ := by
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
have A : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_norm_lt_one h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm]
· simpa [geom_sum_eq, xi_ne_one, neg_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] using A
· simp [norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) h]
instance : HasSummableGeomSeries K :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ (hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).summable⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (h : ‖ξ‖ < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, ξ ^ n = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
hasSum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
theorem summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
theorem tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_one h
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp]
theorem summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_one : (Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ξ ^ n) ↔ ‖ξ‖ < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one⟩
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists
simp only [norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk
rw [← one_pow k] at hk
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ _ zero_le_one hk
end Geometric
section MulGeometric
variable {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜]
theorem summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {k : ℕ} {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) {u : ℕ → ℕ} (hu : (fun n ↦ (u n : ℝ)) =O[atTop] (fun n ↦ (↑(n ^ k) : ℝ))) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖(u n * r ^ n : R)‖ := by
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hrr', h⟩
rw [← norm_norm] at hrr'
apply summable_of_isBigO_nat (summable_geometric_of_lt_one ((norm_nonneg _).trans hrr'.le) h)
calc
fun n ↦ ‖↑(u n) * r ^ n‖
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ u n * ‖r‖ ^ n := by
apply (IsBigOWith.of_bound (c := ‖(1 : R)‖) ?_).isBigO
filter_upwards [eventually_norm_pow_le r] with n hn
simp only [norm_norm, norm_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_cast, norm_pow, abs_norm]
apply (norm_mul_le _ _).trans
have : ‖(u n : R)‖ * ‖r ^ n‖ ≤ (u n * ‖(1 : R)‖) * ‖r‖ ^ n := by
gcongr; exact norm_cast_le (u n)
exact this.trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ ↑(n ^ k) * ‖r‖ ^ n := hu.mul (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =O[atTop] fun n ↦ r' ^ n := by
simp only [cast_pow]
exact (isLittleO_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt k hrr').isBigO
theorem summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖((n : R) ^ k * r ^ n : R)‖ := by
simp only [← cast_pow]
exact summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k := k) (u := fun n ↦ n ^ k) hr
(isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem summable_norm_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {r : R}
(hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ‖(r ^ n : R)‖ := by
simpa using summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one 0 hr
variable [HasSummableGeomSeries R]
lemma hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one'
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ (n + k).choose k * r ^ n) (Ring.inverse (1 - r) ^ (k + 1)) := by
induction k with
| zero => simpa using hasSum_geom_series_inverse r hr
| succ k ih =>
have I1 : Summable (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ‖(n + k).choose k * r ^ n‖) := by
apply summable_norm_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k := k) hr
apply isBigO_iff.2 ⟨2 ^ k, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [Ioi_mem_atTop k] with n (hn : k < n)
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_cast, cast_pow, norm_pow]
norm_cast
calc (n + k).choose k
_ ≤ (2 * n).choose k := choose_le_choose k (by omega)
_ ≤ (2 * n) ^ k := Nat.choose_le_pow _ _
_ = 2 ^ k * n ^ k := Nat.mul_pow 2 n k
convert hasSum_sum_range_mul_of_summable_norm' I1 ih.summable
(summable_norm_geometric_of_norm_lt_one hr) (summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_one hr) with n
· have : ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ↑((i + k).choose k) * r ^ i * r ^ (n - i) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ↑((i + k).choose k) * r ^ n := by
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hi
rw [mul_assoc, ← pow_add, show i + (n - i) = n by omega]
simp [this, ← sum_mul, ← Nat.cast_sum, sum_range_add_choose n k, add_assoc]
· rw [ih.tsum_eq, (hasSum_geom_series_inverse r hr).tsum_eq, pow_succ]
lemma summable_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
Summable (fun n ↦ (n + k).choose k * r ^ n) :=
(hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' k hr).summable
lemma tsum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' (k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
∑' n, (n + k).choose k * r ^ n = (Ring.inverse (1 - r)) ^ (k + 1) :=
(hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' k hr).tsum_eq
lemma hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one
(k : ℕ) {r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ (n + k).choose k * r ^ n) (1 / (1 - r) ^ (k + 1)) := by
convert hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' k hr
simp
lemma tsum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
∑' n, (n + k).choose k * r ^ n = 1/ (1 - r) ^ (k + 1) :=
(hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one k hr).tsum_eq
lemma summable_descFactorial_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
Summable (fun n ↦ (n + k).descFactorial k * r ^ n) := by
convert (summable_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one k hr).mul_left (k.factorial : R)
using 2 with n
simp [← mul_assoc, descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n + k) k]
open Polynomial in
theorem summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
Summable (fun n ↦ (n : R) ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → R) := by
refine Nat.strong_induction_on k fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ (a : ℕ → ℕ), ∀ n, (n + k).descFactorial k
= n ^ k + ∑ i ∈ range k, a i * n ^ i := by
let P : Polynomial ℕ := (ascPochhammer ℕ k).comp (Polynomial.X + C 1)
refine ⟨fun i ↦ P.coeff i, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
have mP : Monic P := Monic.comp_X_add_C (monic_ascPochhammer ℕ k) _
have dP : P.natDegree = k := by
simp only [P, natDegree_comp, ascPochhammer_natDegree, mul_one, natDegree_X_add_C]
have A : (n + k).descFactorial k = P.eval n := by
have : n + 1 + k - 1 = n + k := by omega
simp [P, ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial, this]
conv_lhs => rw [A, mP.as_sum, dP]
simp [eval_finset_sum]
have : Summable (fun n ↦ (n + k).descFactorial k * r ^ n
- ∑ i ∈ range k, a i * n ^ (i : ℕ) * r ^ n) := by
apply (summable_descFactorial_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one k hr).sub
apply summable_sum (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hi
exact (hk _ hi).mul_left _
convert this using 1
ext n
simp [ha n, add_mul, sum_mul]
/-- If `‖r‖ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, `HasSum` version in a general ring
with summable geometric series. For a version in a field, using division instead of `Ring.inverse`,
see `hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one`. -/
theorem hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one'
{x : R} (h : ‖x‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ n * x ^ n : ℕ → R) (x * (Ring.inverse (1 - x)) ^ 2) := by
have A : HasSum (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ (n + 1) * x ^ n) (Ring.inverse (1 - x) ^ 2) := by
convert hasSum_choose_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' 1 h with n
simp
have B : HasSum (fun (n : ℕ) ↦ x ^ n) (Ring.inverse (1 - x)) := hasSum_geom_series_inverse x h
convert A.sub B using 1
· ext n
simp [add_mul]
· symm
calc Ring.inverse (1 - x) ^ 2 - Ring.inverse (1 - x)
_ = Ring.inverse (1 - x) ^ 2 - ((1 - x) * Ring.inverse (1 - x)) * Ring.inverse (1 - x) := by
simp [Ring.mul_inverse_cancel (1 - x) (isUnit_one_sub_of_norm_lt_one h)]
_ = x * Ring.inverse (1 - x) ^ 2 := by noncomm_ring
/-- If `‖r‖ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, version in a general ring with
summable geometric series. For a version in a field, using division instead of `Ring.inverse`,
see `tsum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one`. -/
theorem tsum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one'
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) : (∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n : 𝕜) = r * Ring.inverse (1 - r) ^ 2 :=
(hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' hr).tsum_eq
/-- If `‖r‖ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, `HasSum` version. -/
theorem hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜) (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) := by
convert hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one' hr using 1
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
/-- If `‖r‖ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`. -/
theorem tsum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one {r : 𝕜} (hr : ‖r‖ < 1) :
(∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n : 𝕜) = r / (1 - r) ^ 2 :=
(hasSum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_one hr).tsum_eq
end MulGeometric
section SummableLeGeometric
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] {r C : ℝ} {f : ℕ → α}
nonrec theorem SeminormedAddCommGroup.cauchySeq_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
{u : ℕ → α} (h : ∀ n, ‖u n - u (n + 1)‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) : CauchySeq u :=
cauchySeq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using h)
theorem dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric (hf : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ i ∈ range n, f i) (∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i) ≤ C * r ^ n := by
rw [sum_range_succ, dist_eq_norm, ← norm_neg, neg_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
exact hf n
/-- If `‖f n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` form a
Cauchy sequence. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or `0 ≤ C`. -/
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_geometric_bound (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) :
CauchySeq fun s : Finset ℕ ↦ ∑ x ∈ s, f x :=
cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded _
(aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf)).summable hf
/-- If `‖f n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` are within
distance `C * r ^ n / (1 - r)` of the sum of the series. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or
`0 ≤ C`. -/
theorem norm_sub_le_of_geometric_bound_of_hasSum (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) {a : α}
(ha : HasSum f a) (n : ℕ) : ‖(∑ x ∈ Finset.range n, f x) - a‖ ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
rw [← dist_eq_norm]
apply dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf)
exact ha.tendsto_sum_nat
@[simp]
theorem dist_partial_sum (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), u k) (∑ k ∈ range n, u k) = ‖u n‖ := by
simp [dist_eq_norm, sum_range_succ]
@[simp]
theorem dist_partial_sum' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k ∈ range n, u k) (∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), u k) = ‖u n‖ := by
simp [dist_eq_norm', sum_range_succ]
theorem cauchy_series_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) : CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ k ∈ range n, u k :=
cauchySeq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simp [h])
theorem NormedAddCommGroup.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) : CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), u k :=
(cauchy_series_of_le_geometric hr h).comp_tendsto <| tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1
theorem NormedAddCommGroup.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric'' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {N : ℕ} {r : ℝ}
(hr₀ : 0 < r) (hr₁ : r < 1) (h : ∀ n ≥ N, ‖u n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) :
CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), u k := by
set v : ℕ → α := fun n ↦ if n < N then 0 else u n
have hC : 0 ≤ C :=
(mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right <| pow_pos hr₀ N).mp ((norm_nonneg _).trans <| h N <| le_refl N)
have : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n := by
intro n hn
simp [v, hn, if_neg (not_lt.mpr hn)]
apply cauchySeq_sum_of_eventually_eq this
(NormedAddCommGroup.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' hr₁ _)
· exact C
intro n
simp only [v]
split_ifs with H
· rw [norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hC (pow_nonneg hr₀.le _)
· push_neg at H
exact h _ H
/-- The term norms of any convergent series are bounded by a constant. -/
lemma exists_norm_le_of_cauchySeq (h : CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ k ∈ range n, f k) :
∃ C, ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ C := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨_, key, _⟩⟩ := cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.mp h
refine ⟨b 0, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_partial_sum'] using key n (n + 1) 0 (_root_.zero_le _) (_root_.zero_le _)
end SummableLeGeometric
/-! ### Summability tests based on comparison with geometric series -/
theorem summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le {α : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup α]
[CompleteSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr₁ : r < 1)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖f (n + 1)‖ ≤ r * ‖f n‖) : Summable f := by
by_cases hr₀ : 0 ≤ r
· rw [eventually_atTop] at h
rcases h with ⟨N, hN⟩
rw [← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N]
refine .of_norm_bounded (fun n ↦ ‖f N‖ * r ^ n)
(Summable.mul_left _ <| summable_geometric_of_lt_one hr₀ hr₁) fun n ↦ ?_
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [mul_comm, ← zero_add N]
refine le_geom (u := fun n ↦ ‖f (n + N)‖) hr₀ n fun i _ ↦ ?_
convert hN (i + N) (N.le_add_left i) using 3
ac_rfl
· push_neg at hr₀
refine .of_norm_bounded_eventually_nat 0 summable_zero ?_
filter_upwards [h] with _ hn
by_contra! h
exact not_lt.mpr (norm_nonneg _) (lt_of_le_of_lt hn <| mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hr₀ h)
theorem summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_lt_one {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] [CompleteSpace α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl₁ : l < 1) (hf : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, f n ≠ 0)
(h : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ‖f (n + 1)‖ / ‖f n‖) atTop (𝓝 l)) : Summable f := by
rcases exists_between hl₁ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩
refine summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le hr₁ ?_
filter_upwards [h.eventually_le_const hr₀, hf] with _ _ h₁
rwa [← div_le_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₁)]
theorem not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge {α : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α}
{r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) (hf : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, ‖f n‖ ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, r * ‖f n‖ ≤ ‖f (n + 1)‖) : ¬Summable f := by
rw [eventually_atTop] at h
rcases h with ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩
rw [frequently_atTop] at hf
rcases hf N₀ with ⟨N, hNN₀ : N₀ ≤ N, hN⟩
rw [← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N]
refine mt Summable.tendsto_atTop_zero
fun h' ↦ not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_norm_zero.comp h') ?_
convert tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le _ hr _
· refine lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) ?_
intro h''
specialize hN₀ N hNN₀
simp only [comp_apply, zero_add] at h''
exact hN h''.symm
· intro i
dsimp only [comp_apply]
convert hN₀ (i + N) (hNN₀.trans (N.le_add_left i)) using 3
ac_rfl
theorem not_summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_gt_one {α : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl : 1 < l) (h : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ‖f (n + 1)‖ / ‖f n‖) atTop (𝓝 l)) :
¬Summable f := by
have key : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖f n‖ ≠ 0 := by
filter_upwards [h.eventually_const_le hl] with _ hn hc
rw [hc, _root_.div_zero] at hn
linarith
rcases exists_between hl with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩
refine not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge hr₀ key.frequently ?_
filter_upwards [h.eventually_const_le hr₁, key] with _ _ h₁
rwa [← le_div_iff₀ (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) h₁.symm)]
section NormedDivisionRing
variable [NormedDivisionRing α] [CompleteSpace α] {f : ℕ → α}
/-- If a power series converges at `w`, it converges absolutely at all `z` of smaller norm. -/
theorem summable_powerSeries_of_norm_lt {w z : α}
(h : CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i * w ^ i) (hz : ‖z‖ < ‖w‖) :
Summable fun n ↦ f n * z ^ n := by
have hw : 0 < ‖w‖ := (norm_nonneg z).trans_lt hz
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := exists_norm_le_of_cauchySeq h
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset]
refine cauchySeq_finset_of_geometric_bound (r := ‖z‖ / ‖w‖) (C := C) ((div_lt_one hw).mpr hz)
(fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [norm_mul, norm_pow, div_pow, ← mul_comm_div]
conv at hC => enter [n]; rw [norm_mul, norm_pow, ← _root_.le_div_iff₀ (by positivity)]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hC n) (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg z) n)
/-- If a power series converges at 1, it converges absolutely at all `z` of smaller norm. -/
theorem summable_powerSeries_of_norm_lt_one {z : α}
(h : CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i) (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
Summable fun n ↦ f n * z ^ n :=
summable_powerSeries_of_norm_lt (w := 1) (by simp [h]) (by simp [hz])
end NormedDivisionRing
section
/-! ### Dirichlet and alternating series tests -/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
variable {b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → ℝ} {z : ℕ → E}
/-- **Dirichlet's test** for monotone sequences. -/
theorem Monotone.cauchySeq_series_mul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded (hfa : Monotone f)
(hf0 : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) (hgb : ∀ n, ‖∑ i ∈ range n, z i‖ ≤ b) :
CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i • z i := by
rw [← cauchySeq_shift 1]
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_by_parts _ _ (Nat.succ _), sub_eq_add_neg, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
tsub_zero]
apply (NormedField.tendsto_zero_smul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded hf0
⟨b, eventually_map.mpr <| Eventually.of_forall fun n ↦ hgb <| n + 1⟩).cauchySeq.add
refine CauchySeq.neg ?_
refine cauchySeq_range_of_norm_bounded _ ?_
(fun n ↦ ?_ : ∀ n, ‖(f (n + 1) + -f n) • (Finset.range (n + 1)).sum z‖ ≤ b * |f (n + 1) - f n|)
· simp_rw [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (hfa (Nat.le_succ _))), ← mul_sum]
apply Real.uniformContinuous_const_mul.comp_cauchySeq
simp_rw [sum_range_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
| exact (Tendsto.cauchySeq hf0).add_const
· rw [norm_smul, mul_comm]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hgb _) (abs_nonneg _)
/-- **Dirichlet's test** for antitone sequences. -/
theorem Antitone.cauchySeq_series_mul_of_tendsto_zero_of_bounded (hfa : Antitone f)
(hf0 : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) (hzb : ∀ n, ‖∑ i ∈ range n, z i‖ ≤ b) :
CauchySeq fun n ↦ ∑ i ∈ range n, f i • z i := by
have hfa' : Monotone fun n ↦ -f n := fun _ _ hab ↦ neg_le_neg <| hfa hab
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Normed.lean | 693 | 701 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 564 | 567 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth, Patrick Massot, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
/-!
# Vector bundles
In this file we define (topological) vector bundles.
Let `B` be the base space, let `F` be a normed space over a normed field `R`, and let
`E : B → Type*` be a `FiberBundle` with fiber `F`, in which, for each `x`, the fiber `E x` is a
topological vector space over `R`.
To have a vector bundle structure on `Bundle.TotalSpace F E`, one should additionally have the
following properties:
* The bundle trivializations in the trivialization atlas should be continuous linear equivs in the
fibers;
* For any two trivializations `e`, `e'` in the atlas the transition function considered as a map
from `B` into `F →L[R] F` is continuous on `e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet` with respect to the operator
norm topology on `F →L[R] F`.
If these conditions are satisfied, we register the typeclass `VectorBundle R F E`.
We define constructions on vector bundles like pullbacks and direct sums in other files.
## Main Definitions
* `Trivialization.IsLinear`: a class stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear on its base
set.
* `Trivialization.linearEquivAt` and `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt` are the
(continuous) linear fiberwise equivalences a trivialization induces.
* They have forward maps `Trivialization.linearMapAt` / `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt`
and inverses `Trivialization.symmₗ` / `Trivialization.symmL`. Note that these are all defined
everywhere, since they are extended using the zero function.
* `Trivialization.coordChangeL` is the coordinate change induced by two trivializations. It only
makes sense on the intersection of their base sets, but is extended outside it using the identity.
* Given a continuous (semi)linear map between `E x` and `E' y` where `E` and `E'` are bundles over
possibly different base sets, `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` turns this into a continuous
(semi)linear map between the chosen fibers of those bundles.
## Implementation notes
The implementation choices in the vector bundle definition are discussed in the "Implementation
notes" section of `Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic`.
## Tags
Vector bundle
-/
noncomputable section
open Bundle Set Topology
variable (R : Type*) {B : Type*} (F : Type*) (E : B → Type*)
section TopologicalVectorSpace
variable {F E}
variable [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace B]
/-- A mixin class for `Pretrivialization`, stating that a pretrivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Pretrivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Pretrivialization
variable (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2 :=
Pretrivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
@[simps!]
protected def symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b := by
refine IsLinearMap.mk' (e.symm b) ?_
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet
· exact (((e.linear R hb).mk' _).inverse (e.symm b) (e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb) fun v ↦
congr_arg Prod.snd <| e.apply_mk_symm hb v).isLinear
· rw [e.coe_symm_of_not_mem hb]
exact (0 : F →ₗ[R] E b).isLinear
/-- A pretrivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearEquivAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F where
toFun y := (e ⟨b, y⟩).2
invFun := e.symm b
left_inv := e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb
right_inv v := by simp_rw [e.apply_mk_symm hb v]
map_add' v w := (e.linear R hb).map_add v w
map_smul' c v := (e.linear R hb).map_smul c v
open Classical in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet then e.linearEquivAt R b hb else 0
variable {R}
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [Pretrivialization.linearMapAt]
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem linearMapAt_eq_zero (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).left_inv y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).right_inv y
end Pretrivialization
variable [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
/-- A mixin class for `Trivialization`, stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Trivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Trivialization
variable (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
protected theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun y : E b => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 :=
Trivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
instance toPretrivialization.isLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] : e.toPretrivialization.IsLinear R :=
{ (‹_› : e.IsLinear R) with }
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A trivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
def linearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearEquivAt R b hb
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : E b) : e.linearEquivAt R b hb v = (e ⟨b, v⟩).2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_symm_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : F) : (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).symm v = e.symm b v :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
protected def symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ R b
theorem coe_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.symmₗ R b) = e.symm b :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt R b
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 :=
e.toPretrivialization.coe_linearMapAt b
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ_linearMapAt hb y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt_symmₗ hb y
variable (R) in
open Classical in
/-- A coordinate change function between two trivializations, as a continuous linear equivalence.
Defined to be the identity when `b` does not lie in the base set of both trivializations. -/
def coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
F ≃L[R] F :=
{ toLinearEquiv := if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
then (e.linearEquivAt R b (hb.1 :)).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2)
else LinearEquiv.refl R F
continuous_toFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e'.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.1 (mem_univ y)
· exact fun y => e'.mem_source.mpr hb.2
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id
continuous_invFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e'.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.2 (mem_univ y)
exact fun y => e.mem_source.mpr hb.1
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id }
theorem coe_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b) = (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
congr_arg (fun f : F ≃ₗ[R] F ↦ ⇑f) (dif_pos hb)
theorem coe_coordChangeL' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
(coordChangeL R e e' b).toLinearEquiv =
(e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
LinearEquiv.coe_injective (coe_coordChangeL _ _ hb)
theorem symm_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e'.baseSet ∩ e.baseSet) : (e.coordChangeL R e' b).symm = e'.coordChangeL R e b := by
apply ContinuousLinearEquiv.toLinearEquiv_injective
rw [coe_coordChangeL' e' e hb, (coordChangeL R e e' b).symm_toLinearEquiv,
coe_coordChangeL' e e' hb.symm, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_symm]
theorem coordChangeL_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩).2 :=
congr_fun (coe_coordChangeL e e' hb) y
theorem mk_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
(b, coordChangeL R e e' b y) = e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩ := by
ext
· rw [e.mk_symm hb.1 y, e'.coe_fst', e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
exact hb.2
· exact e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb y
theorem apply_symm_apply_eq_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
[e'.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F) :
e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, v)) = (b, e.coordChangeL R e' b v) := by
rw [e.mk_coordChangeL e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
/-- A version of `Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply` that fully unfolds `coordChange`. The
right-hand side is ugly, but has good definitional properties for specifically defined
trivializations. -/
theorem coordChangeL_apply' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, y))).2 := by
rw [e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
theorem coordChangeL_symm_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R]
{b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b).symm =
(e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2).symm.trans (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1) :=
congr_arg LinearEquiv.invFun (dif_pos hb)
end Trivialization
end TopologicalVectorSpace
section
namespace Bundle
/-- The zero section of a vector bundle -/
def zeroSection [∀ x, Zero (E x)] : B → TotalSpace F E := (⟨·, 0⟩)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_proj [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).proj = x :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_snd [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).2 = 0 :=
rfl
end Bundle
open Bundle
variable [NontriviallyNormedField R] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace R F] [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
[∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)] [FiberBundle F E]
/-- The space `Bundle.TotalSpace F E` (for `E : B → Type*` such that each `E x` is a topological
vector space) has a topological vector space structure with fiber `F` (denoted with
`VectorBundle R F E`) if around every point there is a fiber bundle trivialization which is linear
| in the fibers. -/
class VectorBundle : Prop where
trivialization_linear' : ∀ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e], e.IsLinear R
continuousOn_coordChange' :
| Mathlib/Topology/VectorBundle/Basic.lean | 344 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
|
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 244 | 250 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Disjointed
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
/-!
# Decomposing a locally finite ordered ring into boxes
This file proves that any locally finite ordered ring can be decomposed into "boxes", namely
differences of consecutive intervals.
## Implementation notes
We don't need the full ring structure, only that there is an order embedding `ℤ → `
-/
/-! ### General locally finite ordered ring -/
namespace Finset
variable {α : Type*} [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {n : ℕ}
private lemma Icc_neg_mono : Monotone fun n : ℕ ↦ Icc (-n : α) n := by
refine fun m n hmn ↦ by apply Icc_subset_Icc <;> simpa using Nat.mono_cast hmn
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Hollow box centered at `0 : α` going from `-n` to `n`. -/
def box : ℕ → Finset α := disjointed fun n ↦ Icc (-n : α) n
omit [IsOrderedRing α] in
@[simp] lemma box_zero : (box 0 : Finset α) = {0} := by simp [box]
lemma box_succ_eq_sdiff (n : ℕ) :
| box (n + 1) = Icc (-n.succ : α) n.succ \ Icc (-n) n := by
rw [box, Icc_neg_mono.disjointed_add_one]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Box.lean | 40 | 41 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
| exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 335 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Action.Synonym
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements
This file defines typeclasses to reason about monotonicity of the operations
* `b ↦ a • b`, "left scalar multiplication"
* `a ↦ a • b`, "right scalar multiplication"
We use eight typeclasses to encode the various properties we care about for those two operations.
These typeclasses are meant to be mostly internal to this file, to set up each lemma in the
appropriate generality.
Less granular typeclasses like `OrderedAddCommMonoid`, `LinearOrderedField`, `OrderedSMul` should be
enough for most purposes, and the system is set up so that they imply the correct granular
typeclasses here. If those are enough for you, you may stop reading here! Else, beware that what
follows is a bit technical.
## Definitions
In all that follows, `α` and `β` are orders which have a `0` and such that `α` acts on `β` by scalar
multiplication. Note however that we do not use lawfulness of this action in most of the file. Hence
`•` should be considered here as a mostly arbitrary function `α → β → β`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about left scalar multiplication (`b ↦ a • b`):
* `PosSMulMono`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `b₁ ≤ b₂` implies `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulStrictMono`: If `a > 0`, then `b₁ < b₂` implies `a • b₁ < a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLT`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `a • b₁ < a • b₂` implies `b₁ < b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLE`: If `a > 0`, then `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` implies `b₁ ≤ b₂`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about right scalar multiplication (`a ↦ a • b`):
* `SMulPosMono`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ ≤ a₂` implies `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosStrictMono`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ < a₂` implies `a₁ • b < a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ • b < a₂ • b` implies `a₁ < a₂`.
* `SMulPosReflectLE`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` implies `a₁ ≤ a₂`.
## Constructors
The four typeclasses about nonnegativity can usually be checked only on positive inputs due to their
condition becoming trivial when `a = 0` or `b = 0`. We therefore make the following constructors
available: `PosSMulMono.of_pos`, `PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos`, `SMulPosMono.of_pos`,
`SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos`
## Implications
As `α` and `β` get more and more structure, those typeclasses end up being equivalent. The commonly
used implications are:
* When `α`, `β` are partial orders:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulMono`
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosReflectLT`
* When `β` is a linear order:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* `PosSMulReflectLT → PosSMulMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLT → SMulPosMono` (not registered as instance)
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a linear order:
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosReflectLE`
* When `α` is an ordered ring, `β` an ordered group and also an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulStrictMono → SMulPosStrictMono`
* When `α` is an linear ordered semifield, `β` is an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* When `α` is a semiring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a ring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `SMulPosMono → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
Further, the bundled non-granular typeclasses imply the granular ones like so:
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulStrictMono`
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulReflectLT`
Unless otherwise stated, all these implications are registered as instances,
which means that in practice you should not worry about these implications.
However, if you encounter a case where you think a statement is true but
not covered by the current implications, please bring it up on Zulip!
## Implementation notes
This file uses custom typeclasses instead of abbreviations of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
because:
* They get displayed as classes in the docs. In particular, one can see their list of instances,
instead of their instances being invariably dumped to the `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
list.
* They don't pollute other typeclass searches. Having many abbreviations of the same typeclass for
different purposes always felt like a performance issue (more instances with the same key, for no
added benefit), and indeed making the classes here abbreviation previous creates timeouts due to
the higher number of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` instances.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`/`SMulPosReflectLE` do not fit in the framework since they relate `≤` on two
different types. So we would have to generalise `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` to three
types and two relations.
* Very minor, but the constructors let you work with `a : α`, `h : 0 ≤ a` instead of
`a : {a : α // 0 ≤ a}`. This actually makes some instances surprisingly cleaner to prove.
* The `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` framework is only useful to automate very simple logic
anyway. It is easily copied over.
In the future, it would be good to make the corresponding typeclasses in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled` custom typeclasses too.
## TODO
This file acts as a substitute for `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SMul`. We now need to
* finish the transition by deleting the duplicate lemmas
* rearrange the non-duplicate lemmas into new files
* generalise (most of) the lemmas from `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module` to here
* rethink `OrderedSMul`
-/
open OrderDual
variable (α β : Type*)
section Defs
variable [SMul α β] [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `b₁ < b₂ → a • b₁ < a • b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ < b₂) : a • b₁ < a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ < a • b₂) : b₁ < b₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) : b₁ ≤ b₂
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ • b < a₂ • b` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ < a₂) : a₁ • b < a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) : a₁ < a₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b → a₁ ≤ a₂` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) : a₁ ≤ a₂
end Right
end Defs
variable {α β} {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β}
section Mul
variable [Zero α] [Mul α] [Preorder α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulMono.toPosSMulMono [PosMulMono α] : PosSMulMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosMulStrictMono α] :
PosSMulStrictMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosMulReflectLT α] :
PosSMulReflectLT α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosMulReflectLE α] :
PosSMulReflectLE α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosMono.toSMulPosMono [MulPosMono α] : SMulPosMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosStrictMono [MulPosStrictMono α] :
SMulPosStrictMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLT [MulPosReflectLT α] :
SMulPosReflectLT α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLE [MulPosReflectLE α] :
SMulPosReflectLE α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_right h hb
end Mul
section SMul
variable [SMul α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
lemma monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone ((a • ·) : β → β) :=
PosSMulMono.elim ha
lemma strictMono_smul_left_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
StrictMono ((a • ·) : β → β) := PosSMulStrictMono.elim ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left [PosSMulMono α β] (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ := monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (hb : b₁ < b₂) (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ := strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha hb
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b₁ < a • b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b₁ < b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLT.elim ha h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (h : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) (ha : 0 < a) : b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLE.elim ha h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left := le_of_smul_le_smul_left
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha, fun h ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha.le, fun hb ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha⟩
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) : Monotone ((· • b) : α → β) :=
SMulPosMono.elim hb
lemma strictMono_smul_right_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
StrictMono ((· • b) : α → β) := SMulPosStrictMono.elim hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b := monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg hb ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b := strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb ha
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ < a₂ := SMulPosReflectLT.elim hb h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (h : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ := SMulPosReflectLE.elim hb h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_right := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right := le_of_smul_le_smul_right
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_right h hb, fun ha ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b ↔ a₁ < a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb.le, fun ha ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb⟩
end Right
section LeftRight
variable [Zero α] [Zero β]
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
end LeftRight
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulReflectLE α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).le_iff_le.1
lemma PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulReflectLE α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_le.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulStrictMono_iff_PosSMulReflectLE : PosSMulStrictMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono⟩
instance PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).reflect_lt
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulMono_iff_posSMulReflectLT : PosSMulMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono⟩
lemma smul_max_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • max b₁ b₂ = max (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_max
lemma smul_min_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • min b₁ b₂ = min (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_min
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosReflectLE α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_le.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h hb
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosReflectLE α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_lt.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_lt <| smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_le.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_le <| smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma smulPosStrictMono_iff_SMulPosReflectLE : SMulPosStrictMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono⟩
lemma smulPosMono_iff_smulPosReflectLT : SMulPosMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono⟩
end Right
end LinearOrder
end SMul
section SMulZeroClass
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
lemma smul_neg_of_pos_of_neg [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₁ := 0) (b₂ := b)
|
lemma smul_neg_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Module/Defs.lean | 466 | 467 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
/-!
# Casts for Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define the canonical injection from ℚ into an arbitrary division ring and prove various
casting lemmas showing the well-behavedness of this injection.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom, cast, coercion, casting
-/
assert_not_exists MulAction OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace NNRat
variable [DivisionSemiring α] {q r : ℚ≥0}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℚ≥0) : α) = n := by simp [cast_def]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : ℚ≥0) = (ofNat(n) : α) := cast_natCast _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : α) = 0 := (cast_natCast _).trans Nat.cast_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : α) = 1 := (cast_natCast _).trans Nat.cast_one
lemma cast_commute (q : ℚ≥0) (a : α) : Commute (↑q) a := by
simpa only [cast_def] using (q.num.cast_commute a).div_left (q.den.cast_commute a)
lemma commute_cast (a : α) (q : ℚ≥0) : Commute a q := (cast_commute ..).symm
lemma cast_comm (q : ℚ≥0) (a : α) : q * a = a * q := cast_commute _ _
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_divNat_of_ne_zero (a : ℕ) {b : ℕ} (hb : (b : α) ≠ 0) :
divNat a b = (a / b : α) := by
rcases e : divNat a b with ⟨⟨n, d, h, c⟩, hn⟩
rw [← Rat.num_nonneg] at hn
lift n to ℕ using hn
have hd : (d : α) ≠ 0 := by
refine fun hd ↦ hb ?_
have : Rat.divInt a b = _ := congr_arg NNRat.cast e
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : d ∣ b := by simpa [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, this] using Rat.den_dvd a b
simp [*]
have hb' : b ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact hb Nat.cast_zero
have hd' : d ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact hd Nat.cast_zero
simp_rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, mk_divInt, divNat_inj hb' hd'] at e
rw [cast_def]
dsimp
rw [Commute.div_eq_div_iff _ hd hb]
· norm_cast
rw [e]
exact b.commute_cast _
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_add_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q + r) = (q + r : α) := by
rw [add_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, mul_comm _ q.den,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_add_div (Nat.commute_cast _ _) hq hr]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_mul_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q * r) = (q * r : α) := by
rw [mul_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Nat.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_inv_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.num : α) ≠ 0) : (q⁻¹ : ℚ≥0) = (q⁻¹ : α) := by
rw [inv_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero _ hq, cast_def, inv_div]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_div_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.num : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(q / r) = (q / r : α) := by
rw [div_def, cast_divNat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, div_eq_mul_inv (_ / _),
inv_div, (Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Nat.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
end NNRat
namespace Rat
variable [DivisionRing α] {p q : ℚ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℚ) : α) = n :=
(cast_def _).trans <| show (n / (1 : ℕ) : α) = n by rw [Nat.cast_one, div_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℚ) : α) = n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, cast_intCast, Int.cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℚ) : α) = (ofNat(n) : α) := by
simp [cast_def]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℚ) : α) = 0 :=
(cast_intCast _).trans Int.cast_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one : ((1 : ℚ) : α) = 1 :=
(cast_intCast _).trans Int.cast_one
theorem cast_commute (r : ℚ) (a : α) : Commute (↑r) a := by
simpa only [cast_def] using (r.1.cast_commute a).div_left (r.2.cast_commute a)
theorem cast_comm (r : ℚ) (a : α) : (r : α) * a = a * r :=
(cast_commute r a).eq
theorem commute_cast (a : α) (r : ℚ) : Commute a r :=
(r.cast_commute a).symm
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_divInt_of_ne_zero (a : ℤ) {b : ℤ} (b0 : (b : α) ≠ 0) : (a /. b : α) = a / b := by
have b0' : b ≠ 0 := by
refine mt ?_ b0
simp +contextual
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
have d0 : (d : α) ≠ 0 := by
intro d0
have dd := den_dvd a b
rcases show (d : ℤ) ∣ b by rwa [e] at dd with ⟨k, ke⟩
have : (b : α) = (d : α) * (k : α) := by rw [ke, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [d0, zero_mul] at this
contradiction
rw [mk'_eq_divInt] at e
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℤ → α)
((divInt_eq_iff b0' <| ne_of_gt <| Int.natCast_pos.2 h.bot_lt).1 e)
rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast] at this
rw [eq_comm, cast_def, div_eq_mul_inv, eq_div_iff_mul_eq d0, mul_assoc, (d.commute_cast _).eq,
← mul_assoc, this, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ b0, mul_one]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero (a : ℤ) {b : ℕ} (hb : (b : α) ≠ 0) : (mkRat a b : α) = a / b := by
rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, cast_divInt_of_ne_zero, Int.cast_natCast]; rwa [Int.cast_natCast]
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_add_of_ne_zero {q r : ℚ} (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) (hr : (r.den : α) ≠ 0) :
(q + r : ℚ) = (q + r : α) := by
rw [add_def', cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, mul_comm r.num,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).div_add_div (Nat.commute_cast _ _) hq hr]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hq hr
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_neg (q : ℚ) : ↑(-q) = (-q : α) := by simp [cast_def, neg_div]
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_sub_of_ne_zero (hp : (p.den : α) ≠ 0) (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(p - q) = (p - q : α) := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_add_of_ne_zero, hp, hq]
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_mul_of_ne_zero (hp : (p.den : α) ≠ 0) (hq : (q.den : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(p * q) = (p * q : α) := by
rw [mul_eq_mkRat, cast_mkRat_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def,
(Nat.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Int.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hp hq
@[norm_cast]
lemma cast_inv_of_ne_zero (hq : (q.num : α) ≠ 0) : ↑(q⁻¹) = (q⁻¹ : α) := by
rw [inv_def', cast_divInt_of_ne_zero _ hq, cast_def, inv_div, Int.cast_natCast]
@[norm_cast] lemma cast_div_of_ne_zero (hp : (p.den : α) ≠ 0) (hq : (q.num : α) ≠ 0) :
↑(p / q) = (p / q : α) := by
rw [div_def', cast_divInt_of_ne_zero, cast_def, cast_def, div_eq_mul_inv (_ / _), inv_div,
(Int.commute_cast _ _).div_mul_div_comm (Nat.commute_cast _ _)]
· push_cast
rfl
· push_cast
exact mul_ne_zero hp hq
end Rat
open Rat
variable [FunLike F α β]
@[simp] lemma map_nnratCast [DivisionSemiring α] [DivisionSemiring β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F)
| (q : ℚ≥0) : f q = q := by simp_rw [NNRat.cast_def, map_div₀, map_natCast]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Defs.lean | 207 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one]
simp only [pow_succ, ih, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
theorem mem_mul_span_singleton {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ I * span {y} ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, z * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_smul_span_singleton
theorem mem_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I : Ideal R} : x ∈ span {y} * I ↔ ∃ z ∈ I, y * z = x := by
simp only [mul_comm, mem_mul_span_singleton]
theorem le_span_singleton_mul_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI :=
show (∀ {zI} (_ : zI ∈ I), zI ∈ span {x} * J) ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI by
simp only [mem_span_singleton_mul]
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_iff {x : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ J ↔ ∀ z ∈ I, x * z ∈ J := by
simp only [mul_le, mem_span_singleton_mul, mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· intro h zI hzI
exact h x (dvd_refl x) zI hzI
· rintro h _ ⟨z, rfl⟩ zI hzI
rw [mul_comm x z, mul_assoc]
exact J.mul_mem_left _ (h zI hzI)
theorem span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} {I J : Ideal R} :
span {x} * I ≤ span {y} * J ↔ ∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [span_singleton_mul_le_iff, mem_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I ≤ span {x} * J ↔ I ≤ J := by
simp_rw [span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, mul_right_inj' hx,
exists_eq_right', SetLike.le_def]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_mono [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} ≤ J * span {x} ↔ I ≤ J := by
simpa only [mul_comm I, mul_comm J] using span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
span {x} * I = span {x} * J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_right_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_inj [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
I * span {x} = J * span {x} ↔ I = J := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_left_mono hx]
theorem span_singleton_mul_right_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective ((span {x} : Ideal R) * ·) := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx).mp
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_injective [IsDomain R] {x : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun I : Ideal R => I * span {x} := fun _ _ =>
(span_singleton_mul_left_inj hx).mp
theorem eq_span_singleton_mul {x : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
I = span {x} * J ↔ (∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zJ = zI) ∧ ∀ z ∈ J, x * z ∈ I := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_mul_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_iff]
theorem span_singleton_mul_eq_span_singleton_mul {x y : R} (I J : Ideal R) :
span {x} * I = span {y} * J ↔
(∀ zI ∈ I, ∃ zJ ∈ J, x * zI = y * zJ) ∧ ∀ zJ ∈ J, ∃ zI ∈ I, x * zI = y * zJ := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, span_singleton_mul_le_span_singleton_mul, eq_comm]
theorem prod_span {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → Set R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span (I i)) = Ideal.span (∏ i ∈ s, I i) :=
Submodule.prod_span s I
theorem prod_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} :=
Submodule.prod_span_singleton s I
@[simp]
theorem multiset_prod_span_singleton (m : Multiset R) :
(m.map fun x => Ideal.span {x}).prod = Ideal.span ({Multiset.prod m} : Set R) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) fun a m ih => by
simp only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, ih, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem finset_inf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → R)
(hI : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (IsCoprime on I)) :
(s.inf fun i => Ideal.span ({I i} : Set R)) = Ideal.span {∏ i ∈ s, I i} := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_finset_inf, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime hI, fun h i hi => (Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem _ hi).trans h⟩
theorem iInf_span_singleton {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I : ι → R}
(hI : ∀ (i j) (_ : i ≠ j), IsCoprime (I i) (I j)) :
⨅ i, span ({I i} : Set R) = span {∏ i, I i} := by
rw [← Finset.inf_univ_eq_iInf, finset_inf_span_singleton]
rwa [Finset.coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem iInf_span_singleton_natCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{I : ι → ℕ} (hI : Pairwise fun i j => (I i).Coprime (I j)) :
⨅ (i : ι), span {(I i : R)} = span {((∏ i : ι, I i : ℕ) : R)} := by
rw [iInf_span_singleton, Nat.cast_prod]
exact fun i j h ↦ (hI h).cast
theorem sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) :
span ({x} : Set R) ⊔ span {y} = ⊤ ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, hu, v, hv, h1⟩
rw [mem_span_singleton'] at hu hv
rw [← hu.choose_spec, ← hv.choose_spec] at h1
exact ⟨_, _, h1⟩
· exact fun ⟨u, v, h1⟩ =>
⟨_, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, _, mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩, h1⟩
theorem mul_le_inf : I * J ≤ I ⊓ J :=
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj => ⟨I.mul_mem_right s hri, J.mul_mem_left r hsj⟩
theorem multiset_prod_le_inf {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} : s.prod ≤ s.inf := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· rw [Multiset.inf_zero]
exact le_top
intro a s ih
rw [Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.inf_cons]
exact le_trans mul_le_inf (inf_le_inf le_rfl ih)
theorem prod_le_inf {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} : s.prod f ≤ s.inf f :=
multiset_prod_le_inf
theorem mul_eq_inf_of_coprime (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * J = I ⊓ J :=
le_antisymm mul_le_inf fun r ⟨hri, hrj⟩ =>
let ⟨s, hsi, t, htj, hst⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 h)
mul_one r ▸
hst ▸
(mul_add r s t).symm ▸ Ideal.add_mem (I * J) (mul_mem_mul_rev hsi hrj) (mul_mem_mul hri htj)
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ K :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left mul_le_left _) fun i hi => by
rw [eq_top_iff_one] at h; rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at h hi ⊢
obtain ⟨i1, hi1, j, hj, h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨i', hi', k, hk, hi⟩ := hi
refine ⟨_, add_mem hi' (mul_mem_right k _ hi1), _, mul_mem_mul hj hk, ?_⟩
rw [add_assoc, ← add_mul, h, one_mul, hi]
theorem sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right (h : I ⊔ K = ⊤) : I ⊔ J * K = I ⊔ J := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_left (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = K ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left h, sup_comm]
theorem mul_sup_eq_of_coprime_right (h : K ⊔ J = ⊤) : I * K ⊔ J = I ⊔ J := by
rw [sup_comm] at h
rw [sup_comm, sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_right h, sup_comm]
theorem sup_prod_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ∏ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
Finset.prod_induction _ (fun J => I ⊔ J = ⊤)
(fun _ _ hJ hK => (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hJ).trans hK)
(by simp_rw [one_eq_top, sup_top_eq]) h
theorem sup_multiset_prod_eq_top {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} (h : ∀ p ∈ s, I ⊔ p = ⊤) :
I ⊔ Multiset.prod s = ⊤ :=
Multiset.prod_induction (I ⊔ · = ⊤) s (fun _ _ hp hq ↦ (sup_mul_eq_of_coprime_left hp).trans hq)
(by simp only [one_eq_top, ge_iff_le, top_le_iff, le_top, sup_of_le_right]) h
theorem sup_iInf_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → I ⊔ J i = ⊤) :
(I ⊔ ⨅ i ∈ s, J i) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
le_of_eq_of_le (sup_prod_eq_top h).symm <|
sup_le_sup_left (le_of_le_of_eq prod_le_inf <| Finset.inf_eq_iInf _ _) _
theorem prod_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(∏ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_prod_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem iInf_sup_eq_top {s : Finset ι} {J : ι → Ideal R} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → J i ⊔ I = ⊤) :
(⨅ i ∈ s, J i) ⊔ I = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_iInf_eq_top]; intro i hi; rw [sup_comm, h i hi]
theorem sup_pow_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact sup_prod_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_eq_top {n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ n ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact prod_sup_eq_top fun _ _ => h
theorem pow_sup_pow_eq_top {m n : ℕ} (h : I ⊔ J = ⊤) : I ^ m ⊔ J ^ n = ⊤ :=
sup_pow_eq_top (pow_sup_eq_top h)
variable (I) in
@[simp]
theorem mul_top : I * ⊤ = I :=
Ideal.mul_comm ⊤ I ▸ Submodule.top_smul I
/-- A product of ideals in an integral domain is zero if and only if one of the terms is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma multiset_prod_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsDomain R] {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} :
s.prod = ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff
theorem span_pair_mul_span_pair (w x y z : R) :
(span {w, x} : Ideal R) * span {y, z} = span {w * y, w * z, x * y, x * z} := by
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_mul, mul_sup, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, sup_assoc]
theorem isCoprime_iff_codisjoint : IsCoprime I J ↔ Codisjoint I J := by
rw [IsCoprime, codisjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [eq_top_iff_one]
apply (show x * I + y * J ≤ I ⊔ J from
sup_le (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_left) (mul_le_left.trans le_sup_right))
rw [hxy]
simp only [one_eq_top, Submodule.mem_top]
· intro h
refine ⟨1, 1, ?_⟩
simpa only [one_eq_top, top_mul, Submodule.add_eq_sup]
theorem isCoprime_of_isMaximal [I.IsMaximal] [J.IsMaximal] (ne : I ≠ J) : IsCoprime I J := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, isMaximal_def] at *
exact IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne ‹_› ‹_› ne
theorem isCoprime_iff_add : IsCoprime I J ↔ I + J = 1 := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, add_eq_sup, one_eq_top]
theorem isCoprime_iff_exists : IsCoprime I J ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [← add_eq_one_iff, isCoprime_iff_add]
theorem isCoprime_iff_sup_eq : IsCoprime I J ↔ I ⊔ J = ⊤ := by
rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff]
open List in
theorem isCoprime_tfae : TFAE [IsCoprime I J, Codisjoint I J, I + J = 1,
∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1, I ⊔ J = ⊤] := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, ← isCoprime_iff_add, ← isCoprime_iff_exists,
← isCoprime_iff_sup_eq]
simp
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.codisjoint (h : IsCoprime I J) : Codisjoint I J :=
isCoprime_iff_codisjoint.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.add_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I + J = 1 := isCoprime_iff_add.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.exists (h : IsCoprime I J) : ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 :=
isCoprime_iff_exists.mp h
theorem _root_.IsCoprime.sup_eq (h : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊔ J = ⊤ := isCoprime_iff_sup_eq.mp h
theorem inf_eq_mul_of_isCoprime (coprime : IsCoprime I J) : I ⊓ J = I * J :=
(Ideal.mul_eq_inf_of_coprime coprime.sup_eq).symm
theorem isCoprime_span_singleton_iff (x y : R) :
IsCoprime (span <| singleton x) (span <| singleton y) ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_codisjoint, codisjoint_iff, eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_singleton_sup,
mem_span_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, e⟩; exact ⟨a, b, mul_comm b y ▸ e⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, e⟩; exact ⟨a, _, ⟨b, rfl⟩, mul_comm y b ▸ e⟩
theorem isCoprime_biInf {J : ι → Ideal R} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ j ∈ s, IsCoprime I (J j)) : IsCoprime I (⨅ j ∈ s, J j) := by
classical
simp_rw [isCoprime_iff_add] at *
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp
| insert i s _ hs =>
rw [Finset.iInf_insert, inf_comm, one_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← one_eq_top]
set K := ⨅ j ∈ s, J j
calc
1 = I + K := (hs fun j hj ↦ hf j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)).symm
_ = I + K*(I + J i) := by rw [hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s), mul_one]
_ = (1+K)*I + K*J i := by ring
_ ≤ I + K ⊓ J i := add_le_add mul_le_left mul_le_inf
/-- The radical of an ideal `I` consists of the elements `r` such that `r ^ n ∈ I` for some `n`. -/
def radical (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R where
carrier := { r | ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I }
zero_mem' := ⟨1, (pow_one (0 : R)).symm ▸ I.zero_mem⟩
add_mem' := fun {_ _} ⟨m, hxmi⟩ ⟨n, hyni⟩ =>
⟨m + n - 1, add_pow_add_pred_mem_of_pow_mem I hxmi hyni⟩
smul_mem' {r s} := fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, (mul_pow r s n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_left (r ^ n) h⟩
theorem mem_radical_iff {r : R} : r ∈ I.radical ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, r ^ n ∈ I := Iff.rfl
/-- An ideal is radical if it contains its radical. -/
def IsRadical (I : Ideal R) : Prop :=
I.radical ≤ I
theorem le_radical : I ≤ radical I := fun r hri => ⟨1, (pow_one r).symm ▸ hri⟩
/-- An ideal is radical iff it is equal to its radical. -/
theorem radical_eq_iff : I.radical = I ↔ I.IsRadical := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left le_radical, IsRadical]
alias ⟨_, IsRadical.radical⟩ := radical_eq_iff
theorem isRadical_iff_pow_one_lt (k : ℕ) (hk : 1 < k) : I.IsRadical ↔ ∀ r, r ^ k ∈ I → r ∈ I :=
⟨fun h _r hr ↦ h ⟨k, hr⟩, fun h x ⟨n, hx⟩ ↦
k.pow_imp_self_of_one_lt hk _ (fun _ _ ↦ .inr ∘ I.smul_mem _) h n x hx⟩
variable (R) in
theorem radical_top : (radical ⊤ : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 ⟨0, Submodule.mem_top⟩
theorem radical_mono (H : I ≤ J) : radical I ≤ radical J := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, H hrni⟩
variable (I)
theorem radical_isRadical : (radical I).IsRadical := fun r ⟨n, k, hrnki⟩ =>
⟨n * k, (pow_mul r n k).symm ▸ hrnki⟩
@[simp]
theorem radical_idem : radical (radical I) = radical I :=
(radical_isRadical I).radical
variable {I}
theorem IsRadical.radical_le_iff (hJ : J.IsRadical) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨le_trans le_radical, fun h => hJ.radical ▸ radical_mono h⟩
theorem radical_le_radical_iff : radical I ≤ radical J ↔ I ≤ radical J :=
(radical_isRadical J).radical_le_iff
theorem radical_eq_top : radical I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h =>
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <|
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := (eq_top_iff_one _).1 h
@one_pow R _ n ▸ hn,
fun h => h.symm ▸ radical_top R⟩
theorem IsPrime.isRadical (H : IsPrime I) : I.IsRadical := fun _ ⟨n, hrni⟩ =>
H.mem_of_pow_mem n hrni
theorem IsPrime.radical (H : IsPrime I) : radical I = I :=
IsRadical.radical H.isRadical
theorem mem_radical_of_pow_mem {I : Ideal R} {x : R} {m : ℕ} (hx : x ^ m ∈ radical I) :
x ∈ radical I :=
radical_idem I ▸ ⟨m, hx⟩
theorem disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem (y : R) (hI : I.IsRadical) :
Disjoint (Submonoid.powers y : Set R) ↑I ↔ y ∉ I.1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.disjoint_left.1 h (Submonoid.mem_powers _),
fun h => disjoint_iff.mpr (eq_bot_iff.mpr ?_)⟩
rintro x ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, hx'⟩
exact h (hI <| mem_radical_of_pow_mem <| le_radical hx')
variable (I J)
theorem radical_sup : radical (I ⊔ J) = radical (radical I ⊔ radical J) :=
le_antisymm (radical_mono <| sup_le_sup le_radical le_radical) <|
radical_le_radical_iff.2 <| sup_le (radical_mono le_sup_left) (radical_mono le_sup_right)
theorem radical_inf : radical (I ⊓ J) = radical I ⊓ radical J :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (radical_mono inf_le_left) (radical_mono inf_le_right))
fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ I.mul_mem_right _ hrm,
(pow_add r m n).symm ▸ J.mul_mem_left _ hrn⟩
variable {I J} in
theorem IsRadical.inf (hI : IsRadical I) (hJ : IsRadical J) : IsRadical (I ⊓ J) := by
rw [IsRadical, radical_inf]; exact inf_le_inf hI hJ
/-- `Ideal.radical` as an `InfTopHom`, bundling in that it distributes over `inf`. -/
def radicalInfTopHom : InfTopHom (Ideal R) (Ideal R) where
toFun := radical
map_inf' := radical_inf
map_top' := radical_top _
@[simp]
lemma radicalInfTopHom_apply (I : Ideal R) : radicalInfTopHom I = radical I := rfl
open Finset in
lemma radical_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → (f y).radical = (f i).radical) :
(s.inf f).radical = (f i).radical := by
rw [← radicalInfTopHom_apply, map_finset_inf, ← Finset.inf'_eq_inf ⟨_, hi⟩]
exact Finset.inf'_eq_of_forall _ _ hs
/-- The reverse inclusion does not hold for e.g. `I := fun n : ℕ ↦ Ideal.span {(2 ^ n : ℤ)}`. -/
theorem radical_iInf_le {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) : radical (⨅ i, I i) ≤ ⨅ i, radical (I i) :=
le_iInf fun _ ↦ radical_mono (iInf_le _ _)
theorem isRadical_iInf {ι} (I : ι → Ideal R) (hI : ∀ i, IsRadical (I i)) : IsRadical (⨅ i, I i) :=
(radical_iInf_le I).trans (iInf_mono hI)
theorem radical_mul : radical (I * J) = radical I ⊓ radical J := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ fun r ⟨⟨m, hrm⟩, ⟨n, hrn⟩⟩ =>
⟨m + n, (pow_add r m n).symm ▸ mul_mem_mul hrm hrn⟩
have := radical_mono <| @mul_le_inf _ _ I J
simp_rw [radical_inf I J] at this
assumption
variable {I J}
theorem IsPrime.radical_le_iff (hJ : IsPrime J) : I.radical ≤ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
IsRadical.radical_le_iff hJ.isRadical
theorem radical_eq_sInf (I : Ideal R) : radical I = sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun _ hJ ↦ hJ.2.radical_le_iff.2 hJ.1) fun r hr ↦
by_contradiction fun hri ↦
let ⟨m, hIm, hm⟩ :=
zorn_le_nonempty₀ { K : Ideal R | r ∉ radical K }
(fun c hc hcc y hyc =>
⟨sSup c, fun ⟨n, hrnc⟩ =>
let ⟨_, hyc, hrny⟩ := (Submodule.mem_sSup_of_directed ⟨y, hyc⟩ hcc.directedOn).1 hrnc
hc hyc ⟨n, hrny⟩,
fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
I hri
have hrm : r ∉ radical m := hm.prop
have : ∀ x ∉ m, r ∈ radical (m ⊔ span {x}) := fun x hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hrmx => hxm <| by
rw [hm.eq_of_le hrmx le_sup_left]
exact Submodule.mem_sup_right <| mem_span_singleton_self x
have : IsPrime m :=
⟨by rintro rfl; rw [radical_top] at hrm; exact hrm trivial, fun {x y} hxym =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hxm =>
by_contradiction fun hym =>
let ⟨n, hrn⟩ := this _ hxm
let ⟨p, hpm, q, hq, hpqrn⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrn
let ⟨c, hcxq⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq
let ⟨k, hrk⟩ := this _ hym
let ⟨f, hfm, g, hg, hfgrk⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 hrk
let ⟨d, hdyg⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hg
hrm
⟨n + k, by
rw [pow_add, ← hpqrn, ← hcxq, ← hfgrk, ← hdyg, add_mul, mul_add (c * x),
mul_assoc c x (d * y), mul_left_comm x, ← mul_assoc]
refine
m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_right _ hpm)
(m.add_mem (m.mul_mem_left _ hfm) (m.mul_mem_left _ hxym))⟩⟩
hrm <|
this.radical.symm ▸ (sInf_le ⟨hIm, this⟩ : sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsPrime J } ≤ m) hr
theorem isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
(⊥ : Ideal R).IsRadical := fun _ hx => hx.recOn fun _ hn => pow_eq_zero hn
@[simp]
theorem radical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
radical (⊥ : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 isRadical_bot_of_noZeroDivisors
instance : IdemCommSemiring (Ideal R) :=
inferInstance
variable (R) in
theorem top_pow (n : ℕ) : (⊤ ^ n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
Nat.recOn n one_eq_top fun n ih => by rw [pow_succ, ih, top_mul]
theorem natCast_eq_top {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (n : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
natCast_eq_one hn |>.trans one_eq_top
/-- `3 : Ideal R` is *not* the ideal generated by 3 (which would be spelt
`Ideal.span {3}`), it is simply `1 + 1 + 1 = ⊤`. -/
theorem ofNat_eq_top {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
ofNat_eq_one.trans one_eq_top
variable (I)
lemma radical_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → radical (I ^ n) = radical I
| 1, _ => by simp
| n + 2, _ => by rw [pow_succ, radical_mul, radical_pow n.succ_ne_zero, inf_idem]
theorem IsPrime.mul_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I * J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P := by
rw [or_comm, Ideal.mul_le]
simp_rw [hp.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem, SetLike.le_def, ← forall_or_left, or_comm, forall_or_left]
theorem IsPrime.inf_le {I J P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) : I ⊓ J ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P ∨ J ≤ P :=
⟨fun h ↦ hp.mul_le.1 <| mul_le_inf.trans h, fun h ↦ h.elim inf_le_left.trans inf_le_right.trans⟩
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_le {s : Multiset (Ideal R)} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ I ∈ s, I ≤ P :=
s.induction_on (by simp [hp.ne_top]) fun I s ih ↦ by simp [hp.mul_le, ih]
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_map_le {s : Multiset ι} (f : ι → Ideal R) {P : Ideal R}
(hp : IsPrime P) : (s.map f).prod ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P := by
simp_rw [hp.multiset_prod_le, Multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem IsPrime.multiset_prod_mem_iff_exists_mem {I : Ideal R} (hI : I.IsPrime) (s : Multiset R) :
s.prod ∈ I ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, p ∈ I := by
simpa [span_singleton_le_iff_mem] using (hI.multiset_prod_map_le (span {·}))
theorem IsPrime.pow_le_iff {I P : Ideal R} [hP : P.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
I ^ n ≤ P ↔ I ≤ P := by
have h : (Multiset.replicate n I).prod ≤ P ↔ _ := hP.multiset_prod_le
simp_rw [Multiset.prod_replicate, Multiset.mem_replicate, ne_eq, hn, not_false_eq_true,
true_and, exists_eq_left] at h
exact h
theorem IsPrime.le_of_pow_le {I P : Ideal R} [hP : P.IsPrime] {n : ℕ} (h : I ^ n ≤ P) :
I ≤ P := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, pow_zero, one_eq_top] at h
exact fun ⦃_⦄ _ ↦ h Submodule.mem_top
· exact (pow_le_iff hn).mp h
theorem IsPrime.prod_le {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.prod f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
hp.multiset_prod_map_le f
/-- The product of a finite number of elements in the commutative semiring `R` lies in the
prime ideal `p` if and only if at least one of those elements is in `p`. -/
theorem IsPrime.prod_mem_iff {s : Finset ι} {x : ι → R} {p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsPrime] :
∏ i ∈ s, x i ∈ p ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, x i ∈ p := by
simp_rw [← span_singleton_le_iff_mem, ← prod_span_singleton]
exact hp.prod_le
theorem IsPrime.prod_mem_iff_exists_mem {I : Ideal R} (hI : I.IsPrime) (s : Finset R) :
s.prod (fun x ↦ x) ∈ I ↔ ∃ p ∈ s, p ∈ I := by
rw [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_id']
exact hI.multiset_prod_mem_iff_exists_mem s.val
theorem IsPrime.inf_le' {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {P : Ideal R} (hp : IsPrime P) :
s.inf f ≤ P ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ P :=
⟨fun h ↦ hp.prod_le.1 <| prod_le_inf.trans h, fun ⟨_, his, hip⟩ ↦ (Finset.inf_le his).trans hip⟩
-- Porting note: needed to add explicit coercions (· : Set R).
theorem subset_union {R : Type u} [Ring R] {I J K : Ideal R} :
(I : Set R) ⊆ J ∪ K ↔ I ≤ J ∨ I ≤ K :=
AddSubgroupClass.subset_union
theorem subset_union_prime' {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} {a b : ι}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, IsPrime (f i)) {I : Ideal R} :
((I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) ↔ I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i := by
suffices
((I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) → I ≤ f a ∨ I ≤ f b ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i from
⟨this, fun h =>
Or.casesOn h
(fun h =>
Set.Subset.trans h <|
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left)
fun h =>
Or.casesOn h
(fun h =>
Set.Subset.trans h <|
Set.Subset.trans Set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_left)
fun ⟨i, his, hi⟩ => by
refine Set.Subset.trans hi <| Set.Subset.trans ?_ Set.subset_union_right
exact Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem (u := fun x ↦ (f x : Set R)) (Finset.mem_coe.2 his)⟩
generalize hn : s.card = n; intro h
induction' n with n ih generalizing a b s
· clear hp
rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at hn
subst hn
rw [Finset.coe_empty, Set.biUnion_empty, Set.union_empty, subset_union] at h
simpa only [exists_prop, Finset.not_mem_empty, false_and, exists_false, or_false]
classical
replace hn : ∃ (i : ι) (t : Finset ι), i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s ∧ t.card = n :=
Finset.card_eq_succ.1 hn
rcases hn with ⟨i, t, hit, rfl, hn⟩
replace hp : IsPrime (f i) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, IsPrime (f x) := (t.forall_mem_insert _ _).1 hp
by_cases Ht : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i
· obtain ⟨j, hjt, hfji⟩ : ∃ j ∈ t, f j ≤ f i := Ht
obtain ⟨u, hju, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, j ∉ u ∧ insert j u = t :=
⟨t.erase j, t.not_mem_erase j, Finset.insert_erase hjt⟩
have hp' : ∀ k ∈ insert i u, IsPrime (f k) := by
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hp ⊢
exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.2⟩
have hiu : i ∉ u := mt Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hit
have hn' : (insert i u).card = n := by
rwa [Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem] at hn ⊢
exacts [hiu, hju]
have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ k ∈ (↑(insert i u) : Set ι), f k := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert] at h ⊢
rw [Finset.coe_insert] at h
simp only [Set.biUnion_insert] at h ⊢
rw [← Set.union_assoc (f i : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right hfji] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp' hn' h'
refine ih.imp id (Or.imp id (Exists.imp fun k => ?_))
exact And.imp (fun hk => Finset.insert_subset_insert i (Finset.subset_insert j u) hk) id
by_cases Ha : f a ≤ f i
· have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f i ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_assoc,
Set.union_right_comm (f a : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Ha] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp.2 hn h'
right
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩
· exact Or.inl ih
· exact Or.inr ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩
by_cases Hb : f b ≤ f i
· have h' : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f i ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j := by
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_assoc,
Set.union_assoc (f a : Set R),
Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Hb] at h
exact h
specialize ih hp.2 hn h'
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inl ih
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, ih⟩)
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩)
by_cases Hi : I ≤ f i
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨i, Finset.mem_insert_self i t, Hi⟩)
have : ¬I ⊓ f a ⊓ f b ⊓ t.inf f ≤ f i := by
simp only [hp.1.inf_le, hp.1.inf_le', not_or]
exact ⟨⟨⟨Hi, Ha⟩, Hb⟩, Ht⟩
rcases Set.not_subset.1 this with ⟨r, ⟨⟨⟨hrI, hra⟩, hrb⟩, hr⟩, hri⟩
by_cases HI : (I : Set R) ⊆ f a ∪ f b ∪ ⋃ j ∈ (↑t : Set ι), f j
· specialize ih hp.2 hn HI
rcases ih with (ih | ih | ⟨k, hkt, ih⟩)
· left
exact ih
· right
left
exact ih
· right
right
exact ⟨k, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hkt, ih⟩
exfalso
rcases Set.not_subset.1 HI with ⟨s, hsI, hs⟩
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert] at h
have hsi : s ∈ f i := ((h hsI).resolve_left (mt Or.inl hs)).resolve_right (mt Or.inr hs)
rcases h (I.add_mem hrI hsI) with (⟨ha | hb⟩ | hi | ht)
· exact hs (Or.inl <| Or.inl <| add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f a).sub_mem ha hra)
· exact hs (Or.inl <| Or.inr <| add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f b).sub_mem hb hrb)
· exact hri (add_sub_cancel_right r s ▸ (f i).sub_mem hi hsi)
· rw [Set.mem_iUnion₂] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨j, hjt, hj⟩
simp only [Finset.inf_eq_iInf, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_iInf] at hr
exact hs <| Or.inr <| Set.mem_biUnion hjt <|
add_sub_cancel_left r s ▸ (f j).sub_mem hj <| hr j hjt
/-- Prime avoidance. Atiyah-Macdonald 1.11, Eisenbud 3.3, Matsumura Ex.1.6. -/
@[stacks 00DS]
theorem subset_union_prime {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Ideal R} (a b : ι)
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ a → i ≠ b → IsPrime (f i)) {I : Ideal R} :
((I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, I ≤ f i :=
suffices ((I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i) → ∃ i, i ∈ s ∧ I ≤ f i by
have aux := fun h => (bex_def.2 <| this h)
simp_rw [exists_prop] at aux
refine ⟨aux, fun ⟨i, his, hi⟩ ↦ Set.Subset.trans hi ?_⟩
apply Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem (show i ∈ (↑s : Set ι) from his)
fun h : (I : Set R) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ (↑s : Set ι), f i => by
classical
by_cases has : a ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, hat, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, a ∉ t ∧ insert a t = s :=
⟨s.erase a, Finset.not_mem_erase a s, Finset.insert_erase has⟩
by_cases hbt : b ∈ t
· obtain ⟨u, hbu, rfl⟩ : ∃ u, b ∉ u ∧ insert b u = t :=
⟨t.erase b, Finset.not_mem_erase b t, Finset.insert_erase hbt⟩
have hp' : ∀ i ∈ u, IsPrime (f i) := by
intro i hiu
refine hp i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiu)) ?_ ?_ <;>
rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ←
Set.union_assoc, subset_union_prime' hp'] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert, Finset.exists_mem_insert]
· have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f a : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
· by_cases hbs : b ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, hbt, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, b ∉ t ∧ insert b t = s :=
⟨s.erase b, Finset.not_mem_erase b s, Finset.insert_erase hbs⟩
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f b : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hse | hsne
· subst hse
rw [Finset.coe_empty, Set.biUnion_empty, Set.subset_empty_iff] at h
have : (I : Set R) ≠ ∅ := Set.Nonempty.ne_empty (Set.nonempty_of_mem I.zero_mem)
exact absurd h this
· obtain ⟨i, his⟩ := hsne
obtain ⟨t, _, rfl⟩ : ∃ t, i ∉ t ∧ insert i t = s :=
⟨s.erase i, Finset.not_mem_erase i s, Finset.insert_erase his⟩
have hp' : ∀ j ∈ t, IsPrime (f j) := by
intro j hj
refine hp j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj) ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;>
solve_by_elim only [Finset.mem_insert_of_mem, *]
rw [Finset.coe_insert, Set.biUnion_insert, ← Set.union_self (f i : Set R),
subset_union_prime' hp', ← or_assoc, or_self_iff] at h
rwa [Finset.exists_mem_insert]
section Dvd
| /-- If `I` divides `J`, then `I` contains `J`.
In a Dedekind domain, to divide and contain are equivalent, see `Ideal.dvd_iff_le`.
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 1,112 | 1,114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PurelyInseparable.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PerfectClosure
/-!
# `IsPerfectClosure` predicate
This file contains `IsPerfectClosure` which asserts that `L` is a perfect closure of `K` under a
ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L`, as well as its basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `pNilradical`: given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`).
- `IsPRadical`: a ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L` of characteristic `p` rings is called `p`-radical,
if or any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`,
and the kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
A generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields.
- `IsPerfectClosure`: if `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a
perfect closure of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite.
- `PerfectRing.lift`: if a `p`-radical ring homomorphism `K →+* L` is given, `M` is a perfect ring,
then any ring homomorphism `K →+* M` can be lifted to `L →+* M`.
This is similar to `IsAlgClosed.lift` and `IsSepClosed.lift`.
- `PerfectRing.liftEquiv`: `K →+* M` is one-to-one correspondence to `L →+* M`,
given by `PerfectRing.lift`. This is a generalization to `PerfectClosure.lift`.
- `IsPerfectClosure.equiv`: perfect closures of a ring are isomorphic.
## Main results
- `IsPRadical.trans`: composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical.
- `PerfectClosure.isPRadical`: the absolute perfect closure `PerfectClosure` is a `p`-radical
extension over the base ring, in particular, it is a perfect closure of the base ring.
- `IsPRadical.isPurelyInseparable`, `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical`: `p`-radical and
purely inseparable are equivalent for fields.
- The (relative) perfect closure `perfectClosure` is a perfect closure
(inferred from `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical` automatically by Lean).
## Tags
perfect ring, perfect closure, purely inseparable
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
/-- Given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`). -/
def pNilradical (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Ideal R := if 1 < p then nilradical R else ⊥
theorem pNilradical_le_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} :
pNilradical R p ≤ nilradical R := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
simp_rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp, bot_le]
theorem pNilradical_eq_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := by rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬ 1 < p) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := by rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp]
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot' {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≤ 1) :
pNilradical R p = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot (not_lt.2 hp)
theorem pNilradical_prime {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
pNilradical R p = nilradical R := pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp.one_lt
theorem pNilradical_one {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] :
pNilradical R 1 = ⊥ := pNilradical_eq_bot' rfl.le
theorem mem_pNilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} {x : R} :
x ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = 0 := by
by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical_eq_nilradical hp]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨n, ?_⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ⟨p ^ n, h⟩⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel ((n.lt_pow_self hp).le), pow_add, h, mul_zero]
rw [pNilradical_eq_bot hp, Ideal.mem_bot]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨0, by rw [pow_zero, pow_one, h]⟩, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
rcases Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 (not_lt.1 hp) with hp | hp
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rwa [hn, pow_zero, pow_one] at h
rw [hp, zero_pow hn, pow_zero] at h
subsingleton [subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h.symm]
rwa [hp, one_pow, pow_one] at h
theorem sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [ExpChar R p]
{x y : R} : x - y ∈ pNilradical R p ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ p ^ n = y ^ p ^ n := by
simp_rw [mem_pNilradical, sub_pow_expChar_pow, sub_eq_zero]
theorem pow_expChar_pow_inj_of_pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : pNilradical R p = ⊥) (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun x : R ↦ x ^ p ^ n := fun _ _ H ↦
sub_eq_zero.1 <| Ideal.mem_bot.1 <| h ▸ sub_mem_pNilradical_iff_pow_expChar_pow_eq.2 ⟨n, H⟩
theorem pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
(h : Function.Injective (frobenius R p)) : pNilradical R p = ⊥ := bot_unique fun x ↦ by
rw [mem_pNilradical, Ideal.mem_bot]
exact fun ⟨n, _⟩ ↦ h.iterate n (by rwa [← coe_iterateFrobenius, map_zero])
theorem PerfectRing.pNilradical_eq_bot (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) [ExpChar R p]
[PerfectRing R p] : pNilradical R p = ⊥ :=
pNilradical_eq_bot_of_frobenius_inj R p (injective_frobenius R p)
section IsPerfectClosure
variable {K L M N : Type*}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring K] [CommSemiring L] [CommSemiring M]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (f : L →+* M) (p : ℕ)
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a ring homomorphism of characteristic `p` rings, then it is called
`p`-radical if the following conditions are satisfied:
- For any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`.
- The kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
It is a generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsPRadical : Prop where
pow_mem' : ∀ x : L, ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n
ker_le' : RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p
theorem IsPRadical.pow_mem [IsPRadical i p] (x : L) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : K), i y = x ^ p ^ n := pow_mem' x
theorem IsPRadical.ker_le [IsPRadical i p] :
RingHom.ker i ≤ pNilradical K p := ker_le'
theorem IsPRadical.comap_pNilradical [IsPRadical i p] :
(pNilradical L p).comap i = pNilradical K p := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x h ↦ mem_pNilradical.2 ?_) (fun x h ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| Ideal.mem_comap.1 h
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 <| ker_le i p ((map_pow i x _).symm ▸ h)
exact ⟨n + m, by rwa [pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
simp only [Ideal.mem_comap, mem_pNilradical] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨n, by simpa only [map_pow, map_zero] using congr(i $h)⟩
variable (K) in
instance IsPRadical.of_id : IsPRadical (RingHom.id K) p where
pow_mem' x := ⟨0, x, by simp⟩
ker_le' x h := by convert Ideal.zero_mem _
/-- Composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical. -/
theorem IsPRadical.trans [IsPRadical i p] [IsPRadical f p] :
IsPRadical (f.comp i) p where
pow_mem' x := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hy⟩ := pow_mem f p x
obtain ⟨m, z, hz⟩ := pow_mem i p y
exact ⟨n + m, z, by rw [RingHom.comp_apply, hz, map_pow, hy, pow_add, pow_mul]⟩
ker_le' x h := by
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.comp_apply, ← RingHom.mem_ker] at h
simpa only [← Ideal.mem_comap, comap_pNilradical] using ker_le f p h
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a perfect closure
of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
In this case the kernel of `i` is equal to the `p`-nilradical of `K`
(see `IsPerfectClosure.ker_eq`).
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
abbrev IsPerfectClosure [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] := IsPRadical i p
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is a ring homomorphism of exponential characteristic `p` rings, such that `L`
is perfect, then the `p`-nilradical of `K` is contained in the kernel of `i`. -/
theorem RingHom.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] :
pNilradical K p ≤ RingHom.ker i := fun x h ↦ by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := mem_pNilradical.1 h
replace h := congr((iterateFrobeniusEquiv L p n).symm (i $h))
rwa [map_pow, ← iterateFrobenius_def, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
map_zero, map_zero] at h
variable [ExpChar L p] in
theorem IsPerfectClosure.ker_eq [PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p] :
RingHom.ker i = pNilradical K p :=
IsPRadical.ker_le'.antisymm (i.pNilradical_le_ker_of_perfectRing p)
namespace PerfectRing
/- NOTE: To define `PerfectRing.lift_aux`, only the `IsPRadical.pow_mem` is required, but not
`IsPRadical.ker_le`. But in order to use typeclass, here we require the whole `IsPRadical`. -/
variable [ExpChar M p] [PerfectRing M p] [IsPRadical i p]
theorem lift_aux (x : L) : ∃ y : ℕ × K, i y.2 = x ^ p ^ y.1 := by
obtain ⟨n, y, h⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x
exact ⟨(n, y), h⟩
/-- If `i : K →+* L` and `j : K →+* M` are ring homomorphisms of characteristic `p` rings, such that
`i` is `p`-radical (in fact only the `IsPRadical.pow_mem` is required) and `M` is a perfect ring,
then one can define a map `L → M` which maps an element `x` of `L` to `y ^ (p ^ -n)` if
`x ^ (p ^ n)` is equal to some element `y` of `K`. -/
def liftAux (x : L) : M := (iterateFrobeniusEquiv M p (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).1).symm
(j (Classical.choose (lift_aux i p x)).2)
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_self_apply [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] (x : L) : liftAux i i p x = x := by
rw [liftAux, Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux i p x), ← iterateFrobenius_def,
← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_self [ExpChar L p] [PerfectRing L p] : liftAux i i p = id :=
funext (liftAux_self_apply i p)
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_id_apply (x : K) : liftAux (RingHom.id K) j p x = j x := by
have := RingHom.id_apply _ ▸ Classical.choose_spec (lift_aux (RingHom.id K) p x)
rw [liftAux, this, map_pow, ← iterateFrobenius_def, ← iterateFrobeniusEquiv_apply,
RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_id : liftAux (RingHom.id K) j p = j := funext (liftAux_id_apply j p)
end PerfectRing
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [CommRing L] [CommRing M] [CommRing N]
(i : K →+* L) (j : K →+* M) (k : K →+* N) (f : L →+* M) (g : L →+* N)
(p : ℕ) [ExpChar M p]
namespace IsPRadical
/-- If `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical, then for any ring `M` of exponential charactistic `p` whose
`p`-nilradical is zero, the map `(L →+* M) → (K →+* M)` induced by `i` is injective. -/
theorem injective_comp_of_pNilradical_eq_bot [IsPRadical i p] (h : pNilradical M p = ⊥) :
| Function.Injective fun f : L →+* M ↦ f.comp i := fun f g heq ↦ by
ext x
obtain ⟨n, y, hx⟩ := IsPRadical.pow_mem i p x
apply_fun _ using pow_expChar_pow_inj_of_pNilradical_eq_bot M p h n
simpa only [← map_pow, ← hx] using congr($(heq) y)
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsPerfectClosure.lean | 256 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# With Density
For an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` which is finite
everywhere, we define `withDensity κ f` as the kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. This is
an s-finite kernel.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.withDensity κ (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞)`:
kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. It is defined if `κ` is s-finite. If `f` is finite
everywhere, then this is also an s-finite kernel. The class of s-finite kernels is the smallest
class of kernels that contains finite kernels and which is stable by `withDensity`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.lintegral_withDensity`:
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
variable {κ : Kernel α β} {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Kernel with image `(κ a).withDensity (f a)` if `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, and
with image 0 otherwise. If `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, it satisfies
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f hf a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`. -/
noncomputable def withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
Kernel α β :=
@dite _ (Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (Classical.dec _) (fun hf =>
(⟨fun a => (κ a).withDensity (f a),
by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact hf.setLIntegral_kernel_prod_right hs⟩ : Kernel α β)) fun _ => 0
theorem withDensity_of_not_measurable (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : ¬Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) : withDensity κ f = 0 := by classical exact dif_neg hf
protected theorem withDensity_apply (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) :
withDensity κ f a = (κ a).withDensity (f a) := by
classical
rw [withDensity, dif_pos hf]
rfl
protected theorem withDensity_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
withDensity κ f a s = ∫⁻ b in s, f a b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply κ hf, withDensity_apply' _ s]
| nonrec lemma withDensity_congr_ae (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
(hfg : ∀ a, f a =ᵐ[κ a] g a) :
withDensity κ f = withDensity κ g := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/WithDensity.lean | 68 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Lattice structure on order homomorphisms
This file defines the lattice structure on order homomorphisms, which are bundled
monotone functions.
## Main definitions
* `OrderHom.CompleteLattice`: if `β` is a complete lattice, so is `α →o β`
## Tags
monotone map, bundled morphism
-/
namespace OrderHom
variable {α β : Type*}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
instance [SemilatticeSup β] : Max (α →o β) where
max f g := ⟨fun a => f a ⊔ g a, f.mono.sup g.mono⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sup [SemilatticeSup β] (f g : α →o β) :
((f ⊔ g : α →o β) : α → β) = (f : α → β) ⊔ g := rfl
instance [SemilatticeSup β] : SemilatticeSup (α →o β) :=
{ (_ : PartialOrder (α →o β)) with
sup := Max.max
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_left
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ => le_sup_right
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₀ h₁ x => sup_le (h₀ x) (h₁ x) }
instance [SemilatticeInf β] : Min (α →o β) where
min f g := ⟨fun a => f a ⊓ g a, f.mono.inf g.mono⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inf [SemilatticeInf β] (f g : α →o β) :
((f ⊓ g : α →o β) : α → β) = (f : α → β) ⊓ g := rfl
instance [SemilatticeInf β] : SemilatticeInf (α →o β) :=
{ (_ : PartialOrder (α →o β)), (dualIso α β).symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftSemilatticeInf with
inf := (· ⊓ ·) }
instance lattice [Lattice β] : Lattice (α →o β) :=
{ (_ : SemilatticeSup (α →o β)), (_ : SemilatticeInf (α →o β)) with }
@[simps]
instance [Preorder β] [OrderBot β] : Bot (α →o β) where
bot := const α ⊥
instance orderBot [Preorder β] [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (α →o β) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ _ := bot_le
@[simps]
instance instTopOrderHom [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] : Top (α →o β) where
top := const α ⊤
instance orderTop [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (α →o β) where
top := ⊤
le_top _ _ := le_top
instance [CompleteLattice β] : InfSet (α →o β) where
sInf s := ⟨fun x => ⨅ f ∈ s, (f :) x, fun _ _ h => iInf₂_mono fun f _ => f.mono h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply [CompleteLattice β] (s : Set (α →o β)) (x : α) :
sInf s x = ⨅ f ∈ s, (f :) x :=
rfl
theorem iInf_apply {ι : Sort*} [CompleteLattice β] (f : ι → α →o β) (x : α) :
(⨅ i, f i) x = ⨅ i, f i x :=
(sInf_apply _ _).trans iInf_range
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} [CompleteLattice β] (f : ι → α →o β) :
((⨅ i, f i : α →o β) : α → β) = ⨅ i, (f i : α → β) := by
funext x; simp [iInf_apply]
instance [CompleteLattice β] : SupSet (α →o β) where
sSup s := ⟨fun x => ⨆ f ∈ s, (f :) x, fun _ _ h => iSup₂_mono fun f _ => f.mono h⟩
@[simp]
| theorem sSup_apply [CompleteLattice β] (s : Set (α →o β)) (x : α) :
sSup s x = ⨆ f ∈ s, (f :) x :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Order.lean | 97 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Divisor Finsets
This file defines sets of divisors of a natural number. This is particularly useful as background
for defining Dirichlet convolution.
## Main Definitions
Let `n : ℕ`. All of the following definitions are in the `Nat` namespace:
* `divisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`.
* `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`, other than `n`.
* `divisorsAntidiagonal n` is the `Finset` of pairs `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`.
* `Perfect n` is true when `n` is positive and the sum of `properDivisors n` is `n`.
## Conventions
Since `0` has infinitely many divisors, none of the definitions in this file make sense for it.
Therefore we adopt the convention that `Nat.divisors 0`, `Nat.properDivisors 0`,
`Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0` and `Int.divisorsAntidiag 0` are all `∅`.
## Tags
divisors, perfect numbers
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- `divisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`. By convention, we set `divisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def divisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1) | d ∣ n}
/-- `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`, other than `n`.
By convention, we set `properDivisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 n | d ∣ n}
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number as a finset.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonal` is the finset of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`.
By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅`.
O(n). -/
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(Icc 1 n).filterMap (fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
fun x₁ x₂ (x, y) hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by aesop
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number, as a list.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonalList` is the list of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`, ordered
by increasing `a`. By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = []`.
-/
def divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) : List (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(List.range' 1 n).filterMap
(fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n.succ | d ∣ n} = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n | d ∣ n} = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := x
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, mem_filterMap, mem_Icc, one_le_iff_ne_zero,
Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, Prod.ext_iff, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨han, ⟨ha, han'⟩, rfl⟩
simp [Nat.mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, han]
omega
· rintro ⟨rfl, hab⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hab
simpa [hab.1, hab.2] using Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ hab.2.bot_lt
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_zero : divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_one : divisorsAntidiagonalList 1 = [(1, 1)] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.toFinset = n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
rw [divisorsAntidiagonalList, divisorsAntidiagonal, List.toFinset_filterMap (f_inj := by aesop),
List.toFinset_range'_1_1]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.fst < ·.fst) := by
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap fun a b c d h h' ha => ?_
rw [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h h'
simpa [← h.right, ← h'.right]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.snd > ·.snd) := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap ?_
simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, gt_iff_lt, and_imp, Prod.forall,
Prod.mk.injEq]
rintro a b _ _ _ _ ha rfl rfl hb rfl rfl hab
rwa [Nat.div_lt_div_left hn ⟨_, hb.symm⟩ ⟨_, ha.symm⟩]
lemma nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} : n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Nodup :=
have : IsIrrefl (ℕ × ℕ) (·.fst < ·.fst) := ⟨by simp⟩
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.nodup
/-- The `Finset` and `List` versions agree by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem val_divisorsAntidiagonal (n : ℕ) :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).val = divisorsAntidiagonalList n :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a.1 * a.2 = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
rw [← List.mem_toFinset, toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal]
@[simp high]
lemma swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a.swap ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList := by simp [mul_comm]
lemma reverse_divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.reverse = n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.map .swap := by
have : IsAsymm (ℕ × ℕ) (·.snd < ·.snd) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ lt_asymm⟩
refine List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ?_ sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd.reverse <|
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.map _ fun _ _ ↦ id
simp [List.reverse_perm', List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList
(nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList.map Prod.swap_injective), mul_comm]
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
rcases m with - | m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
|
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 200 | 202 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Hom.ContinuousEval
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
/-!
# The compact-open topology
In this file, we define the compact-open topology on the set of continuous maps between two
topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMap.compactOpen` is the compact-open topology on `C(X, Y)`.
It is declared as an instance.
* `ContinuousMap.coev` is the coevaluation map `Y → C(X, Y × X)`. It is always continuous.
* `ContinuousMap.curry` is the currying map `C(X × Y, Z) → C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This map always exists
and it is continuous as long as `X × Y` is locally compact.
* `ContinuousMap.uncurry` is the uncurrying map `C(X, C(Y, Z)) → C(X × Y, Z)`. For this map to
exist, we need `Y` to be locally compact. If `X` is also locally compact, then this map is
continuous.
* `Homeomorph.curry` combines the currying and uncurrying operations into a homeomorphism
`C(X × Y, Z) ≃ₜ C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This homeomorphism exists if `X` and `Y` are locally compact.
## Tags
compact-open, curry, function space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology
namespace ContinuousMap
section CompactOpen
variable {α X Y Z T : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace T]
variable {K : Set X} {U : Set Y}
/-- The compact-open topology on the space of continuous maps `C(X, Y)`. -/
instance compactOpen : TopologicalSpace C(X, Y) :=
.generateFrom <| image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {U | IsOpen U}
/-- Definition of `ContinuousMap.compactOpen`. -/
theorem compactOpen_eq : @compactOpen X Y _ _ =
.generateFrom (image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {t | IsOpen t}) :=
rfl
theorem isOpen_setOf_mapsTo (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) :
IsOpen {f : C(X, Y) | MapsTo f K U} :=
isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem <| mem_image2_of_mem hK hU
lemma eventually_mapsTo {f : C(X, Y)} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) (h : MapsTo f K U) :
∀ᶠ g : C(X, Y) in 𝓝 f, MapsTo g K U :=
(isOpen_setOf_mapsTo hK hU).mem_nhds h
lemma nhds_compactOpen (f : C(X, Y)) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ (K : Set X) (_ : IsCompact K) (U : Set Y) (_ : IsOpen U) (_ : MapsTo f K U),
𝓟 {g : C(X, Y) | MapsTo g K U} := by
simp_rw [compactOpen_eq, nhds_generateFrom, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (f ∈ _), iInf_and,
← image_prod, iInf_image, biInf_prod, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendsto_nhds_compactOpen {l : Filter α} {f : α → C(Y, Z)} {g : C(Y, Z)} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 g) ↔
∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → MapsTo g K U → ∀ᶠ a in l, MapsTo (f a) K U := by
simp [nhds_compactOpen]
lemma continuous_compactOpen {f : X → C(Y, Z)} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → IsOpen {x | MapsTo (f x) K U} :=
continuous_generateFrom_iff.trans forall_mem_image2
protected lemma hasBasis_nhds (f : C(X, Y)) :
| (𝓝 f).HasBasis
(fun S : Set (Set X × Set Y) ↦
S.Finite ∧ ∀ K U, (K, U) ∈ S → IsCompact K ∧ IsOpen U ∧ MapsTo f K U)
(⋂ KU ∈ ·, {g : C(X, Y) | MapsTo g KU.1 KU.2}) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/CompactOpen.lean | 79 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Volume forms and measures on inner product spaces
A volume form induces a Lebesgue measure on general finite-dimensional real vector spaces. In this
file, we discuss the specific situation of inner product spaces, where an orientation gives
rise to a canonical volume form. We show that the measure coming from this volume form gives
measure `1` to the parallelepiped spanned by any orthonormal basis, and that it coincides with
the canonical `volume` from the `MeasureSpace` instance.
-/
open Module MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set
variable {ι E F : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F]
namespace LinearIsometryEquiv
variable (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F)
/-- Every linear isometry equivalence is a measurable equivalence. -/
def toMeasurableEquiv : E ≃ᵐ F where
toEquiv := f
measurable_toFun := f.continuous.measurable
measurable_invFun := f.symm.continuous.measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-22")] alias toMeasureEquiv := toMeasurableEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_toMeasurableEquiv : (f.toMeasurableEquiv : E → F) = f := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-22")] alias coe_toMeasureEquiv := coe_toMeasurableEquiv
theorem toMeasurableEquiv_symm : f.toMeasurableEquiv.symm = f.symm.toMeasurableEquiv := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-22")] alias toMeasureEquiv_symm := toMeasurableEquiv_symm
end LinearIsometryEquiv
variable [Fintype ι]
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ F]
section
variable {m n : ℕ} [_i : Fact (finrank ℝ F = n)]
/-- The volume form coming from an orientation in an inner product space gives measure `1` to the
parallelepiped associated to any orthonormal basis. This is a rephrasing of
`abs_volumeForm_apply_of_orthonormal` in terms of measures. -/
theorem Orientation.measure_orthonormalBasis (o : Orientation ℝ F (Fin n))
(b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) : o.volumeForm.measure (parallelepiped b) = 1 := by
have e : ι ≃ Fin n := by
refine Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq ?_
rw [← _i.out, finrank_eq_card_basis b.toBasis]
have A : ⇑b = b.reindex e ∘ e := by
ext x
simp only [OrthonormalBasis.coe_reindex, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [A, parallelepiped_comp_equiv, AlternatingMap.measure_parallelepiped,
o.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_orthonormal, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
/-- In an oriented inner product space, the measure coming from the canonical volume form
associated to an orientation coincides with the volume. -/
theorem Orientation.measure_eq_volume (o : Orientation ℝ F (Fin n)) :
o.volumeForm.measure = volume := by
have A : o.volumeForm.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ F).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 :=
Orientation.measure_orthonormalBasis o (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ F)
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique o.volumeForm.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ F).toBasis.parallelepiped, A, one_smul]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar]
end
/-- The volume measure in a finite-dimensional inner product space gives measure `1` to the
parallelepiped spanned by any orthonormal basis. -/
theorem OrthonormalBasis.volume_parallelepiped (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
volume (parallelepiped b) = 1 := by
haveI : Fact (finrank ℝ F = finrank ℝ F) := ⟨rfl⟩
let o := (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ F).toBasis.orientation
rw [← o.measure_eq_volume]
exact o.measure_orthonormalBasis b
/-- The Haar measure defined by any orthonormal basis of a finite-dimensional inner product space
is equal to its volume measure. -/
theorem OrthonormalBasis.addHaar_eq_volume {ι F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ F] [FiniteDimensional ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F]
(b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
b.toBasis.addHaar = volume := by
rw [Basis.addHaar_eq_iff]
exact b.volume_parallelepiped
/-- An orthonormal basis of a finite-dimensional inner product space defines a measurable
equivalence between the space and the Euclidean space of the same dimension. -/
noncomputable def OrthonormalBasis.measurableEquiv (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
F ≃ᵐ EuclideanSpace ℝ ι := b.repr.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv
/-- The measurable equivalence defined by an orthonormal basis is volume preserving. -/
theorem OrthonormalBasis.measurePreserving_measurableEquiv (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
MeasurePreserving b.measurableEquiv volume volume := by
convert (b.measurableEquiv.symm.measurable.measurePreserving _).symm
rw [← (EuclideanSpace.basisFun ι ℝ).addHaar_eq_volume]
erw [MeasurableEquiv.coe_toEquiv_symm, Basis.map_addHaar _ b.repr.symm.toContinuousLinearEquiv]
exact b.addHaar_eq_volume.symm
theorem OrthonormalBasis.measurePreserving_repr (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
MeasurePreserving b.repr volume volume := b.measurePreserving_measurableEquiv
theorem OrthonormalBasis.measurePreserving_repr_symm (b : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ F) :
MeasurePreserving b.repr.symm volume volume := b.measurePreserving_measurableEquiv.symm
section PiLp
| variable (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι]
/-- The measure equivalence between `EuclideanSpace ℝ ι` and `ι → ℝ` is volume preserving. -/
theorem EuclideanSpace.volume_preserving_measurableEquiv :
MeasurePreserving (EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv ι) := by
suffices volume = map (EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv ι).symm volume by
convert ((EuclideanSpace.measurableEquiv ι).symm.measurable.measurePreserving _).symm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/InnerProductSpace.lean | 120 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
/-! # Functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-σ-algebra
A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different.
We define `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ`, the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to an `m`-strongly
measurable function.
## Main statements
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of `lpMeas`.
`Lp.induction_stronglyMeasurable` (see also `MemLp.induction_stronglyMeasurable`):
To prove something for an `Lp` function a.e. strongly measurable with respect to a
sub-σ-algebra `m` in a normed space, it suffices to show that
* the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions which are measurable w.r.t. `m`;
* is closed under addition;
* the set of functions in `Lp` strongly measurable w.r.t. `m` for which the property holds is
closed.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different. -/
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable (since := "2025-01-23")]
def AEStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (m : MeasurableSpace α)
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Prop := AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ
namespace AEStronglyMeasurable'
variable {α β 𝕜 : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace β]
{f g : α → β}
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.congr (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem congr (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ := AEStronglyMeasurable.congr hf hfg
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.mono (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem mono {m'} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hm : m ≤ m') :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m'] f μ := AEStronglyMeasurable.mono hm hf
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.add (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem add [Add β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (f + g) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.add hf hg
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.neg (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem neg [Neg β] [ContinuousNeg β] {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (-f) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hfm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.sub (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem sub [AddGroup β] [IsTopologicalAddGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (f - g) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.sub hfm hgm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem const_smul [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (c : 𝕜) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (c • f) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul hf _
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.const_inner (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem const_inner {𝕜 β} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup β] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 β] {f : α → β}
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (c : β) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) μ :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.const_inner hfm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton β] : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := .of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := .of_subsingleton_dom
/-- An `m`-strongly measurable function almost everywhere equal to `f`. -/
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.mk (since := "2025-01-23")]
noncomputable def mk (f : α → β) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) : α → β :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.mk f hfm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_mk (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] (hfm.mk f) :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_mk hfm
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem ae_eq_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] hfm.mk f :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_mk hfm
@[deprecated Continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem continuous_comp {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hf
end AEStronglyMeasurable'
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.of_trim (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim {α β} {m m0 m0' : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] (hm0 : m0 ≤ m0') {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f (μ.trim hm0)) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := .of_trim hm0 hf
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' {α β} {m _ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := hf.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aestronglyMeasurable {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β} (hm : m ≤ m0)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) :
hfm.mk f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] hgm.mk g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
(hfm.stronglyMeasurable_mk.ae_eq_trim_iff hm hgm.stronglyMeasurable_mk).trans
⟨fun h => hfm.ae_eq_mk.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk.symm), fun h =>
hfm.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aeStronglyMeasurable' := ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_ae_measurable' {α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : α → β} {μ : Measure γ} {g : γ → α}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.map g)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[mα.comap g] (f ∘ g) μ :=
⟨hf.mk f ∘ g, hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable (measurable_iff_comap_le.mpr le_rfl),
ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` almost
everywhere supported on `s` is `m`-ae-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also
`m₂`-ae-strongly-measurable. -/
@[deprecated AEStronglyMeasurable.of_measurableSpace_le_on (since := "2025-01-23")]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable'.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E}
{m m₂ m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] (hm : m ≤ m0)
{s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m₂] f μ :=
.of_measurableSpace_le_on hm hs_m hs hf hf_zero
variable {α F 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section LpMeas
/-! ## The subset `lpMeas` of `Lp` functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-sigma-algebra -/
variable (F)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeasSubgroup (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
AddSubgroup (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
neg_mem' {f} hf := AEStronglyMeasurable.congr hf.neg (Lp.coeFn_neg f).symm
variable (𝕜)
/-- `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeas (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
Submodule 𝕜 (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
smul_mem' c f hf := (hf.const_smul c).congr (Lp.coeFn_smul c f).symm
variable {F 𝕜}
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := by
rw [← AddSubgroup.mem_carrier, lpMeasSubgroup, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' := mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable := mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.mem_carrier, lpMeas, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' := mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable := mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] (f : α → F) μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp f.mem
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-24")]
alias lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' := lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable := lpMeas.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem mem_lpMeas_self {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : Lp F p μ) :
f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m0 p μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mpr (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f)
theorem mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) {c : F} :
indicatorConstLp p (hm s hs) hμs c ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨s.indicator fun _ : α => c, (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _).indicator hs,
indicatorConstLp_coeFn⟩
section CompleteSubspace
/-! ## The subspace `lpMeas` is complete.
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of
`lpMeasSubgroup` (and `lpMeas`). -/
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- If `f` belongs to `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`, then the measurable function it is almost
everywhere equal to (given by `AEMeasurable.mk`) belongs to `ℒp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`. -/
theorem memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p μ)
(hf_meas : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
MemLp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp hf_meas).choose p (μ.trim hm) := by
have hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ :=
mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp hf_meas
let g := hf.choose
obtain ⟨hg, hfg⟩ := hf.choose_spec
change MemLp g p (μ.trim hm)
refine ⟨hg.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have h_eLpNorm_fg : eLpNorm g p (μ.trim hm) = eLpNorm f p μ := by
rw [eLpNorm_trim hm hg]
exact eLpNorm_congr_ae hfg.symm
rw [h_eLpNorm_fg]
exact Lp.eLpNorm_lt_top f
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup := memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup
/-- If `f` belongs to `Lp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`, then it belongs to the subgroup
`lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`. -/
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
(memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f)).toLp f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ := by
let hf_mem_ℒp := memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f)
rw [mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable]
refine AEStronglyMeasurable.congr ?_ (MemLp.coeFn_toLp hf_mem_ℒp).symm
exact (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).of_trim hm
variable (F p μ)
/-- Map from `lpMeasSubgroup` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
MemLp.toLp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp f.mem).choose
(memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
variable (𝕜) in
/-- Map from `lpMeas` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
MemLp.toLp (mem_lpMeas_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp f.mem).choose
(memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeasSubgroup`, inverse of
`lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ :=
⟨(memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
variable (𝕜) in
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeas`, inverse of `Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeas (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨(memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
variable {F p μ}
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (MemLp.coeFn_toLp (memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
theorem lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
MemLp.coeFn_toLp (memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f))
theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (MemLp.coeFn_toLp (memLp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aestronglyMeasurable.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
theorem lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeas F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
MemLp.coeFn_toLp (memLp_of_memLp_trim hm (Lp.memLp f))
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a right inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.RightInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
refine
(Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_
exact (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _)
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a left inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.LeftInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
ext1
exact (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _)
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f + g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f + lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).add (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _)
refine (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm
(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm g).symm)
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans ?_
filter_upwards with x using rfl
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (-f) = -lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_neg _).symm
refine (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).neg
<| (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans <|
((Lp.coeFn_neg _).trans ?_).trans (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm.neg
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => by rfl
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f - g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f - lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add,
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg]
theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : 𝕜) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm (c • f) = c • lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
refine (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).const_smul c
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
/-- `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim` preserves the norm. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0)
(f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) : ‖lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, eLpNorm_trim hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _),
eLpNorm_congr_ae (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _), ← Lp.norm_def]
congr
theorem isometry_lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Isometry (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun f g => by
rw [dist_eq_norm, ← lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub, lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map,
dist_eq_norm]
variable (F p μ)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup` and `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` are isometric. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrimIso [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ≃ᵢ Lp F p (μ.trim hm) where
toFun := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm
invFun := lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm
left_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv hm
right_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv hm
isometry_toFun := isometry_lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim hm
variable (𝕜)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup` and `lpMeas` are isometric. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpMeasIso [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ≃ᵢ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
IsometryEquiv.refl (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ)
/-- `lpMeas` and `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` are isometric, with a linear equivalence. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasToLpTrimLie [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] Lp F p (μ.trim hm) where
toFun := lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm
invFun := lpTrimToLpMeas F 𝕜 p μ hm
left_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv hm
right_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv hm
map_add' := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add hm
map_smul' := lpMeasToLpTrim_smul hm
norm_map' := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map hm
variable {F 𝕜 p μ}
instance [hm : Fact (m ≤ m0)] [CompleteSpace F] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
CompleteSpace (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) := by
rw [(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrimIso F p μ hm.elim).completeSpace_iff]; infer_instance
-- For now just no-lint this; lean4's tree-based logging will make this easier to debug.
-- One possible change might be to generalize `𝕜` from `RCLike` to `NormedField`, as this
-- result may well hold there.
-- Porting note: removed @[nolint fails_quickly]
instance [hm : Fact (m ≤ m0)] [CompleteSpace F] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
CompleteSpace (lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) := by
rw [(lpMeasSubgroupToLpMeasIso F 𝕜 p μ).symm.completeSpace_iff]; infer_instance
theorem isComplete_aestronglyMeasurable [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] [CompleteSpace F] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
IsComplete {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ} := by
rw [← completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete]
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
change CompleteSpace (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ)
infer_instance
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias isComplete_aeStronglyMeasurable' := isComplete_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem isClosed_aestronglyMeasurable [Fact (1 ≤ p)] [CompleteSpace F] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
IsClosed {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ} :=
IsComplete.isClosed (isComplete_aestronglyMeasurable hm)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias isClosed_aeStronglyMeasurable' := isClosed_aestronglyMeasurable
end CompleteSubspace
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
| /-- We do not get `ae_fin_strongly_measurable f (μ.trim hm)`, since we don't have
`f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim F 𝕜 p μ hm f` but only the weaker
`f =ᵐ[μ] Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim F 𝕜 p μ hm f`. -/
theorem lpMeas.ae_fin_strongly_measurable' (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/AEMeasurable.lean | 453 | 457 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Partial sums of geometric series
This file determines the values of the geometric series $\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i$ and
$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i y^{n-1-i}$ and variants thereof. We also provide some bounds on the
"geometric" sum of `a/b^i` where `a b : ℕ`.
## Main statements
* `geom_sum_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^i=\frac{x^n-x^m}{x-1}$ in a division ring.
* `geom_sum₂_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^iy^{n - 1 - i}=\frac{x^n-y^{n-m}x^m}{x-y}$
in a field.
Several variants are recorded, generalising in particular to the case of a noncommutative ring in
which `x` and `y` commute. Even versions not using division or subtraction, valid in each semiring,
are recorded.
-/
variable {R K : Type*}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
theorem geom_sum_one (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem geom_sum_two {x : R} : ∑ i ∈ range 2, x ^ i = x + 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem zero_geom_sum : ∀ {n}, ∑ i ∈ range n, (0 : R) ^ i = if n = 0 then 0 else 1
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [geom_sum_succ']
simp [zero_geom_sum]
theorem one_geom_sum (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, (1 : R) ^ i = n := by simp
theorem op_geom_sum (x : R) (n : ℕ) : op (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, op x ^ i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum₂ (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ (n - 1 - i) * op x ^ i =
∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ i * op x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at j_in
congr
apply tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right j_in
theorem geom_sum₂_with_one (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * 1 ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i _ => by rw [one_pow, mul_one]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n := by
let f : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun m i : ℕ => (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i)
change (∑ i ∈ range n, (f n) i) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n
induction n with
| zero => rw [range_zero, sum_empty, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
have f_last : f (n + 1) n = (x + y) ^ n := by
dsimp only [f]
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, Nat.add_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one]
have f_succ : ∀ i, i ∈ range n → f (n + 1) i = y * f n i := fun i hi => by
dsimp only [f]
have : Commute y ((x + y) ^ i) := (h.symm.add_right (Commute.refl y)).pow_right i
rw [← mul_assoc, this.eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ' y (n - 1 - i), add_tsub_cancel_right,
← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm 1 i]
have : i + 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n := add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mem_range.mp hi)
rw [add_comm (i + 1)] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_right, add_comm i 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [pow_succ' (x + y), add_mul, sum_range_succ_comm, add_mul, f_last, add_assoc,
(((Commute.refl x).add_right h).pow_right n).eq, sum_congr rfl f_succ, ← mul_sum,
pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, ← mul_add y, ih]
end Semiring
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_geom_sum [Ring R] {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range n, (-1 : R) ^ i = if Even n then 0 else 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ k hk =>
simp only [geom_sum_succ', Nat.even_add_one, hk]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.neg_one_pow, add_zero]
· rw [(Nat.not_even_iff_odd.1 h).neg_one_pow, neg_add_cancel]
theorem geom_sum₂_self {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) = n * x ^ (n - 1) :=
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (i + (n - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [← pow_add]
_ = ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (n - 1) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ hi =>
congr_arg _ <| add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi
_ = #(range n) • x ^ (n - 1) := sum_const _
_ = n * x ^ (n - 1) := by rw [Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_add [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
theorem geom_sum_mul_add [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + 1) ^ i) * x + 1 = (x + 1) ^ n := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
have := (h.sub_left (Commute.refl y)).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [← this, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((y - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_mul, op_sub, op_geom_sum₂, op_pow]
simp [(Commute.op h.symm).geom_sum₂_mul n]
theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rw [← neg_sub (y ^ n), ← h.mul_neg_geom_sum₂, ← neg_mul, neg_sub]
theorem geom_sum₂_mul [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : y ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
apply eq_tsub_of_add_eq
simpa only [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hxy] using geom_sum₂_mul_add (x - y) y n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : x ≤ y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (y - x) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
rw [← Finset.sum_range_reflect]
convert geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hxy n using 3
simp_all only [Finset.mem_range]
rw [mul_comm]
congr
omega
theorem Commute.sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
Dvd.intro _ <| h.mul_geom_sum₂ _
theorem sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x y n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rcases le_or_lt y x with h | h
· have : y ^ n ≤ x ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h _
exact mod_cast sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) n
· have : x ^ n ≤ y ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h.le _
exact (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le this).symm ▸ dvd_zero (x - y)
theorem one_sub_dvd_one_sub_pow [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
1 - x ∣ 1 - x ^ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_left x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
x - 1 ∣ x ^ n - 1 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_right x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
lemma pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (m n : ℕ) :
((x ^ m) - 1 : R) ∣ (x ^ (m * n) - 1) := by
rw [npow_mul]
exact sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one (x := x ^ m) (n := n)
lemma nat_pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one (x m n : ℕ) : x ^ m - 1 ∣ x ^ (m * n) - 1 := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.one_pow n]
rw [Nat.pow_mul x m n]
apply nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x ^ m) 1
theorem Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) :
x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n := by
have h₁ := geom_sum₂_mul x (-y) n
rw [Odd.neg_pow h y, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_neg_eq_add] at h₁
exact Dvd.intro_left _ h₁
theorem Odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x y : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) : x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n :=
mod_cast Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) h
theorem geom_sum_mul [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_one_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hx n
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_le_one [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : x ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_le hx n
theorem mul_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((x - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = x ^ n - 1 :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul (op x) n
theorem geom_sum_mul_neg [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
have := congr_arg Neg.neg (geom_sum_mul x n)
rw [neg_sub, ← mul_neg, neg_sub] at this
exact this
theorem mul_neg_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((1 - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = 1 - x ^ n :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul_neg (op x) n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_comm [Semiring R] {x y : R} (n : ℕ)
(h : Commute x y) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
cases n; · simp
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [← Finset.sum_flip]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
simpa [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hi))] using h.pow_pow _ _
theorem geom_sum₂_comm [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_comm n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂ [DivisionRing K] {x y : K} (h' : Commute x y) (h : x ≠ y)
(n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h'.geom_sum₂_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
theorem geom₂_sum [Field K] {x y : K} (h : x ≠ y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂ h n
theorem geom₂_sum_of_gt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : y < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge h.le n)
theorem geom₂_sum_of_lt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : x < y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (y ^ n - x ^ n) / (y - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_le h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_eq [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (h : x ≠ 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) := by
have : x - 1 ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← geom_sum_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
lemma geom_sum_of_one_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : 1 < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_one_le h.le n)
lemma geom_sum_of_lt_one {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : x < 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (1 - x ^ n) / (1 - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_le_one h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h0 : x ≠ 0) (h1 : x < 1) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < (1 - x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at h0
rw [geom_sum_of_lt_one h1, div_lt_iff₀, inv_mul_cancel₀, tsub_lt_self_iff]
· exact ⟨h0.trans h1, pow_pos h0 n⟩
· rwa [ne_eq, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, not_le]
· rwa [tsub_pos_iff_lt]
protected theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn]
have :
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * y ^ (n - 1 - k) =
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * (y ^ (n - m) * y ^ (m - 1 - k)) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [← pow_add]
congr
rw [mem_range] at j_in
omega
rw [this]
simp_rw [pow_mul_comm y (n - m) _]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← sum_mul, mul_sub, h.mul_geom_sum₂, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_geom_sum₂, sub_mul, ← pow_add,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right (x ^ n) (x ^ m * y ^ (n - m)) (y ^ n)]
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_range_succ_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one, add_right_inj, ← mul_assoc,
(h.symm.pow_right _).eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ']
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
suffices n - 1 - i + 1 = n - i by rw [this]
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
omega
theorem geom_sum₂_succ_eq [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_succ_eq
theorem mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [CommRing R] (x y : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) :=
(Commute.all x y).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_sub, op_mul, op_pow, op_sum]
have : (∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) * MulOpposite.op x ^ k) =
∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op x ^ k * MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun k _ => ?_
have hp := Commute.pow_pow (Commute.op h.symm) (n - 1 - k) k
simpa [Commute, SemiconjBy] using hp
simp only [this]
convert (Commute.op h).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul [Ring R] (x : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - x ^ m := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul, geom_sum_mul, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul_neg [Ring R] (x : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = x ^ m - x ^ n := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_sum_mul_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico [DivisionRing K] {x y : K} (h : Commute x y) (hxy : x ≠ y)
{m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul hmn, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
theorem geom_sum₂_Ico [Field K] {x y : K} (hxy : x ≠ y) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_Ico hxy hmn
| theorem geom_sum_Ico [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - x ^ m) / (x - 1) := by
simp only [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, geom_sum_eq hx, div_sub_div_same, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem geom_sum_Ico' [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ m - x ^ n) / (1 - x) := by
simp only [geom_sum_Ico hx hmn]
convert neg_div_neg_eq (x ^ m - x ^ n) (1 - x) using 2 <;> abel
theorem geom_sum_Ico_le_of_lt_one [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 376 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Patrick Stevens
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Sums of binomial coefficients
This file includes variants of the binomial theorem and other results on sums of binomial
coefficients. Theorems whose proofs depend on such sums may also go in this file for import
reasons.
-/
open Nat Finset
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Commute
variable [Semiring R] {x y : R}
/-- A version of the **binomial theorem** for commuting elements in noncommutative semirings. -/
theorem add_pow (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m := by
let t : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun n m ↦ x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m
change (x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), t n m
have h_first : ∀ n, t n 0 = y ^ n := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_zero_right, pow_zero, cast_one, mul_one, one_mul, tsub_zero]
have h_last : ∀ n, t n n.succ = 0 := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero]
have h_middle :
∀ n i : ℕ, i ∈ range n.succ → (t n.succ i.succ) = x * t n i + y * t n i.succ := by
intro n i h_mem
have h_le : i ≤ n := le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.mp h_mem)
dsimp only [t]
rw [choose_succ_succ, cast_add, mul_add]
congr 1
· rw [pow_succ' x, succ_sub_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_assoc y, ← mul_assoc y, (h.symm.pow_right i.succ).eq]
by_cases h_eq : i = n
· rw [h_eq, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [succ_sub (lt_of_le_of_ne h_le h_eq)]
rw [pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, sum_range_succ, range_zero, sum_empty, zero_add]
dsimp only [t]
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, choose_self, cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [sum_range_succ', h_first, sum_congr rfl (h_middle n), sum_add_distrib, add_assoc,
pow_succ' (x + y), ih, add_mul, mul_sum, mul_sum]
congr 1
rw [sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ, h_first, h_last, mul_zero, add_zero, _root_.pow_succ']
/-- A version of `Commute.add_pow` that avoids ℕ-subtraction by summing over the antidiagonal and
also with the binomial coefficient applied via scalar action of ℕ. -/
theorem add_pow' (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ antidiagonal n, n.choose m.1 • (x ^ m.1 * y ^ m.2) := by
simp_rw [Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun m p ↦ n.choose m • (x ^ m * y ^ p),
nsmul_eq_mul, cast_comm, h.add_pow]
end Commute
/-- The **binomial theorem** -/
| theorem add_pow [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m :=
(Commute.all x y).add_pow n
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Sum.lean | 72 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Even Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the meromorphic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaEven a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, 1 / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`cosZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / |n| ^ s`.
Note that the term for `n = -a` in the first sum is omitted if `a` is an integer, and the term for
`n = 0` is omitted in the second sum (always).
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
meromorphic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
We also define completed versions of these functions with nicer functional equations (satisfying
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = Gammaℝ s * hurwitzZetaEven a s`, and similarly for `cosZeta`); and
modified versions with a subscript `0`, which are entire functions differing from the above by
multiples of `1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `hurwitzZetaEven` and `cosZeta`: the zeta functions
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven` and `completedCosZeta`: completed variants
* `differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven` and `differentiableAt_cosZeta`:
differentiability away from `s = 1`
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven` and `hasSum_nat_cosZeta`: relation between the zeta functions and
the corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Even Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the even part of the
completed Hurwit zeta function). See `evenKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_evenKernel` for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`. -/
@[irreducible] def evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic
(fun ξ : ℝ ↦ rexp (-π * ξ ^ 2 * x) * re (jacobiTheta₂ (ξ * I * x) (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ
simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, add_mul, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
have : cexp (-↑π * I * ((I * ↑x) + 2 * (↑ξ * I * ↑x))) = rexp (π * (x + 2 * ξ * x)) := by
ring_nf
simp [I_sq]
rw [this, re_ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr
ring).lift a
lemma evenKernel_def (a x : ℝ) :
↑(evenKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x) := by
simp [evenKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
/-- For `x ≤ 0` the defining sum diverges, so the kernel is 0. -/
lemma evenKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : evenKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a' => simp [← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- Cosine Hurwitz zeta kernel. See `cosKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_cosKernel` for expression as a sum. -/
@[irreducible] def cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂ ξ (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂_add_left]).lift a
lemma cosKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(cosKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂ a (I * x) := by
simp [cosKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
lemma cosKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : cosKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- For `a = 0`, both kernels agree. -/
lemma evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero : evenKernel 0 = cosKernel 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def]
@[simp]
lemma evenKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : evenKernel (-a) x = evenKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
@[simp]
lemma cosKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : cosKernel (-a) x = cosKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def]
lemma continuousOn_evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (evenKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (evenKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [evenKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ .mul (by fun_prop) ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a' * I * x) <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a' * I * u, I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma continuousOn_cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (cosKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (cosKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [cosKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ a' <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ ((a' : ℂ), I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma evenKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
evenKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) * cosKernel a (1 / x) := by
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [evenKernel_undef _ hx, cosKernel_undef, mul_zero]
exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos zero_le_one hx
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_functional_equation]
have h1 : I * ↑(1 / x) = -1 / (I * x) := by
push_cast
rw [← div_div, mul_one_div, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg]
have hx' : I * x ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero I_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne')
have h2 : a * I * x / (I * x) = a := by
rw [div_eq_iff hx']
ring
have h3 : 1 / (-I * (I * x)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) = 1 / ↑(x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg,ofReal_cpow hx.le, ofReal_div,
ofReal_one, ofReal_ofNat]
have h4 : -π * I * (a * I * x) ^ 2 / (I * x) = - (-π * a ^ 2 * x) := by
rw [mul_pow, mul_pow, I_sq, div_eq_iff hx']
ring
rw [h1, h2, h3, h4, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm (cexp _), mul_assoc _ (cexp _) (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add, neg_add_cancel, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
end kernel_defs
section asymp
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t)) (evenKernel a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, evenKernel_def]
have (n : ℤ) : cexp (-(π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t)) = cexp (-(π * a ^ 2 * t)) *
jacobiTheta₂_term n (a * I * t) (I * t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
ring_nf
simp
simpa [this] using (hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by simpa)).mul_left _
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(cosKernel a t) := by
rw [cosKernel_def a t]
have (n : ℤ) : cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * cexp (-(π * n ^ 2 * t)) =
jacobiTheta₂_term n a (I * ↑t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
ring_nf
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
simpa [this] using hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by simpa)
/-- Modified version of `hasSum_int_evenKernel` omitting the constant term at `∞`. -/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n + a = 0 then 0 else rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t))
(evenKernel a t - if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable -- speed up instance search for `if / then / else`
simp_rw [AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff, zsmul_one]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
simpa [← Int.cast_add, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_evenKernel (k : ℝ) ht) (-k)
· suffices ∀ (n : ℤ), n + a ≠ 0 by simpa [this] using hasSum_int_evenKernel a ht
contrapose! h
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨-n, by simpa [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]⟩
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(↑(cosKernel a t) - 1) := by
simpa using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht) 0
lemma hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * Real.cos (2 * π * a * (n + 1)) * rexp (-π * (n + 1) ^ 2 * t))
(cosKernel a t - 1) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, ofReal_sub, ofReal_one]
have := (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
rw [← hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1] at this
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_one, Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Int.cast_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero,
mul_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, Real.exp_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_natCast, neg_sq, ← add_mul, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub,
← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_neg] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.cos, mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `evenKernel a - L` has exponential decay at `+∞`, where `L = 1` if
`a = 0` and `L = 0` otherwise. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) : ∃ p : ℝ, 0 < p ∧
(evenKernel a · - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0)) =O[atTop] (rexp <| -p * ·) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H b =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_zero_sub b
refine ⟨p, hp, (EventuallyEq.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t h
simp [← (hasSum_int_evenKernel b h).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int]
/-- The function `cosKernel a - 1` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (cosKernel a · - 1) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_zero_sub zero_le_one
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simp only [eq_false_intro one_ne_zero, if_false, sub_zero,
← (hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ a ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded ((HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 0 1 ht).hasSum.mul_left 2)
intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_zero, one_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of a FE-pair
-/
/-- A `WeakFEPair` structure with `f = evenKernel a` and `g = cosKernel a`. -/
def hurwitzEvenFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : WeakFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal ∘ evenKernel a
g := ofReal ∘ cosKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_evenKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_cosKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 1 / 2
hk := one_half_pos
ε := 1
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := if a = 0 then 1 else 0
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
conv at hv' =>
enter [2, x]; rw [← norm_real, ofReal_sub, apply_ite ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ), ofReal_one, ofReal_zero]
exact hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
g₀ := 1
hg_top r := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub a
simpa using isBigO_ofReal_left.mpr <| hp'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hp r).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp [← ofReal_mul, evenKernel_functional_equation, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx)]
@[simp]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm :
(hurwitzEvenFEPair 0).symm = hurwitzEvenFEPair 0 := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair WeakFEPair.symm
congr 1 <;> simp [evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero]
@[simp]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) : hurwitzEvenFEPair (-a) = hurwitzEvenFEPair a := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair
congr 1 <;> simp [Function.comp_def]
/-!
## Definition of the completed even Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), 1 / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a s =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· change completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (1 / (s / 2)) • (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / 2 =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, mul_one_div]
· change (1 / (↑(1 / 2 : ℝ) - s / 2)) • 1 / 2 = 1 / (1 - s)
push_cast
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ← sub_div, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedCosZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedCosZeta a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedCosZeta₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedCosZeta_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a s =
completedCosZeta₀ a s - 1 / s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedCosZeta, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· rw [completedCosZeta₀, WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
· simp_rw [WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, push_cast, inv_one, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm _ (if _ then _ else _), mul_div_assoc, div_div, ← sub_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_one_div]
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
@[simp]
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaEven]
@[simp]
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀]
@[simp]
lemma completedCosZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta (-a) s = completedCosZeta a s := by
simp [completedCosZeta]
@[simp]
lemma completedCosZeta₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ (-a) s = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
simp [completedCosZeta₀]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation₀ (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
end FEPair
/-!
## Differentiability and residues
-/
section FEPair
/--
The even Hurwitz completed zeta is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1` (and also at
`s = 0` if `a ≠ 0`)
-/
lemma differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven
(a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaEven a) s := by
refine (((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).differentiableAt_Λ ?_ (Or.inl ?_)).comp s
(differentiableAt_id.div_const _)).div_const _
· rcases hs with h | h <;>
simp [hurwitzEvenFEPair, h]
· change s / 2 ≠ ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)
rw [ofReal_div, ofReal_one, ofReal_ofNat]
exact hs' ∘ (div_left_inj' two_ne_zero).mp
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a) :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).differentiable_Λ₀.comp (differentiable_id.div_const _)).div_const _
/-- The difference of two completed even Hurwitz zeta functions is differentiable at `s = 1`. -/
lemma differentiableAt_one_completedHurwitzZetaEven_sub_completedHurwitzZetaEven
(a b : UnitAddCircle) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s ↦ completedHurwitzZetaEven a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven b s) 1 := by
have (s) : completedHurwitzZetaEven a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven b s =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ b s -
((if a = 0 then 1 else 0) - (if b = 0 then 1 else 0)) / s := by
simp_rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, sub_div]
abel
rw [funext this]
refine .sub ?_ <| (differentiable_const _ _).div (differentiable_id _) one_ne_zero
apply DifferentiableAt.sub <;> apply differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀
lemma differentiableAt_completedCosZeta
(a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (completedCosZeta a) s := by
refine (((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.differentiableAt_Λ (Or.inl ?_) ?_).comp s
(differentiableAt_id.div_const _)).div_const _
· exact div_ne_zero_iff.mpr ⟨hs, two_ne_zero⟩
· change s / 2 ≠ ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ) ∨ (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) = 0
refine Or.imp (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun ha ↦ ?_) hs'
· simpa [push_cast] using h ∘ (div_left_inj' two_ne_zero).mp
· simpa
lemma differentiable_completedCosZeta₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedCosZeta₀ a) :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ₀.comp (differentiable_id.div_const _)).div_const _
private lemma tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds (a : ℂ) :
Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s / 2) (𝓝[≠] a) (𝓝[≠] (a / 2)) :=
le_of_eq ((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ _ (inv_ne_zero (two_ne_zero' ℂ))).map_punctured_nhds_eq a)
/-- The residue of `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ (s - ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)) * _) (𝓝[≠] ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ))
(𝓝 ((1 : ℂ) * (1 : ℂ))) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ_residue_k
simp only [push_cast, one_mul] at h1
refine (h1.comp <| tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 1).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, Function.comp_apply, ← sub_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
/-- The residue of `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` at `s = 0` is equal to `-1` if `a = 0`, and `0`
otherwise. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 (if a = 0 then -1 else 0)) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s * _) (𝓝[≠] 0)
(𝓝 (-(if a = 0 then 1 else 0))) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ_residue_zero
have : -(if a = 0 then (1 : ℂ) else 0) = (if a = 0 then -1 else 0) := by { split_ifs <;> simp }
simp only [this, push_cast, one_mul] at h1
refine (h1.comp <| zero_div (2 : ℂ) ▸ (tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 0)).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
simp [completedHurwitzZetaEven, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
lemma completedCosZeta_residue_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * completedCosZeta a s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
have h1 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ s * _) (𝓝[≠] 0)
(𝓝 (-1)) := (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ_residue_zero
refine (h1.comp <| zero_div (2 : ℂ) ▸ (tendsto_div_two_punctured_nhds 0)).congr (fun s ↦ ?_)
simp [completedCosZeta, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
end FEPair
/-!
## Relation to the Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
/-- Formula for `completedCosZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(first version, with sum over `ℤ`). -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedCosZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ s * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / (↑|n| : ℂ) ^ s / 2)
(completedCosZeta a s) := by
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / 2
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else c n * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
((cosKernel a t - 1) / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_cosKernel₀ a ht).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs <;> simp [c, div_mul_eq_mul_div]
simp only [← Int.cast_eq_zero (α := ℝ)] at hF
rw [show completedCosZeta a s = mellin (fun t ↦ (cosKernel a t - 1 : ℂ) / 2) (s / 2) by
rw [mellin_div_const, completedCosZeta]
congr 1
refine ((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.hasMellin (?_ : 1 / 2 < (s / 2).re)).2.symm
rwa [div_ofNat_re, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right two_pos]]
refine (hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF ?_).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
· apply (((summable_one_div_int_add_rpow 0 s.re).mpr hs).div_const 2).of_norm_bounded
intro i
simp only [c, (by { push_cast; ring } : 2 * π * I * a * i = ↑(2 * π * a * i) * I), norm_div,
RCLike.norm_ofNat, norm_norm, Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I, add_zero, norm_one,
norm_of_nonneg (by positivity : 0 ≤ |(i : ℝ)| ^ s.re), div_right_comm, le_rfl]
· simp [c, ← Int.cast_abs, div_right_comm, mul_div_assoc]
/-- Formula for `completedCosZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(second version, with sum over `ℕ`). -/
lemma hasSum_nat_completedCosZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else Gammaℝ s * Real.cos (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s)
(completedCosZeta a s) := by
have aux : ((|0| : ℤ) : ℂ) ^ s = 0 := by
rw [abs_zero, Int.cast_zero, zero_cpow (ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs)]
have hint := (hasSum_int_completedCosZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
rw [aux, div_zero, zero_div, add_zero] at hint
refine hint.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, Nat.cast_zero, aux, div_zero, zero_div, neg_zero, zero_add]
· simp only [ofReal_cos, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_natCast, Complex.cos,
show 2 * π * a * n * I = 2 * π * I * a * n by ring, neg_mul, mul_div_assoc,
div_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ), Int.cast_natCast, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_neg, mul_neg, abs_neg, ←
mul_add, ← add_div]
/-- Formula for `completedHurwitzZetaEven` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range. -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaEven (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ s / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (completedHurwitzZetaEven a s) := by
have hF (t : ℝ) (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n + a = 0 then 0
else (1 / 2 : ℂ) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t))
((evenKernel a t - (if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0 : ℝ)) / 2) := by
refine (ofReal_sub .. ▸ (hasSum_ofReal.mpr (hasSum_int_evenKernel₀ a ht)).div_const
2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
split_ifs
· rw [ofReal_zero, zero_div]
· rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div]
rw [show completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = mellin (fun t ↦ ((evenKernel (↑a) t : ℂ) -
↑(if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0 : ℝ)) / 2) (s / 2) by
simp_rw [mellin_div_const, apply_ite ofReal, ofReal_one, ofReal_zero]
refine congr_arg (· / 2) ((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).hasMellin (?_ : 1 / 2 < (s / 2).re)).2.symm
rwa [div_ofNat_re, div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right two_pos]]
refine (hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF ?_).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
· simp_rw [← mul_one_div ‖_‖]
apply Summable.mul_left
rwa [summable_one_div_int_add_rpow]
· rw [mul_one_div, div_right_comm]
/-!
## The un-completed even Hurwitz zeta
-/
/-- Technical lemma which will give us differentiability of Hurwitz zeta at `s = 0`. -/
lemma differentiableAt_update_of_residue
{Λ : ℂ → ℂ} (hf : ∀ (s : ℂ) (_ : s ≠ 0) (_ : s ≠ 1), DifferentiableAt ℂ Λ s)
{L : ℂ} (h_lim : Tendsto (fun s ↦ s * Λ s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 L)) (s : ℂ) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (Function.update (fun s ↦ Λ s / Gammaℝ s) 0 (L / 2)) s := by
have claim (t) (ht : t ≠ 0) (ht' : t ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun u : ℂ ↦ Λ u / Gammaℝ u) t :=
(hf t ht ht').mul differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.differentiableAt
have claim2 : Tendsto (fun s : ℂ ↦ Λ s / Gammaℝ s) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 <| L / 2) := by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (h_lim.div Gammaℝ_residue_zero two_ne_zero)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with s (hs : s ≠ 0)
rw [Pi.div_apply, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hs]
rcases ne_or_eq s 0 with hs | rfl
· -- Easy case : `s ≠ 0`
refine (claim s hs hs').congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_
filter_upwards [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hs] with x hx
simp [Function.update_of_ne hx]
· -- Hard case : `s = 0`
simp_rw [← claim2.limUnder_eq]
have S_nhds : {(1 : ℂ)}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℂ) := isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hs'
refine ((Complex.differentiableOn_update_limUnder_of_isLittleO S_nhds
(fun t ht ↦ (claim t ht.2 ht.1).differentiableWithinAt) ?_) 0 hs').differentiableAt S_nhds
simp only [Gammaℝ, zero_div, div_zero, Complex.Gamma_zero, mul_zero, cpow_zero, sub_zero]
-- Remains to show completed zeta is `o (s ^ (-1))` near 0.
refine (isBigO_const_of_tendsto claim2 <| one_ne_zero' ℂ).trans_isLittleO ?_
rw [isLittleO_iff_tendsto']
· exact Tendsto.congr (fun x ↦ by rw [← one_div, one_div_one_div]) nhdsWithin_le_nhds
· exact eventually_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin fun x hx hx' ↦ (hx <| inv_eq_zero.mp hx').elim
/-- The even part of the Hurwitz zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `1 / 2 * ∑' (n : ℤ), 1 / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s` -/
noncomputable def hurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) :=
Function.update (fun s ↦ completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s)
0 (if a = 0 then -1 / 2 else 0)
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_def_of_ne_or_ne {a : UnitAddCircle} {s : ℂ} (h : a ≠ 0 ∨ s ≠ 0) :
hurwitzZetaEven a s = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [hurwitzZetaEven]
rcases ne_or_eq s 0 with h' | rfl
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
· simpa [Gammaℝ] using h
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_apply_zero (a : UnitAddCircle) :
hurwitzZetaEven a 0 = if a = 0 then -1 / 2 else 0 :=
Function.update_self ..
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
hurwitzZetaEven (-a) s = hurwitzZetaEven a s := by
simp [hurwitzZetaEven]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the even Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (a : UnitAddCircle) (n : ℕ) :
hurwitzZetaEven a (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 := by
have : (-2 : ℂ) * (n + 1) ≠ 0 :=
mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero n)
rw [hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne this, Gammaℝ_eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨n + 1, by simp⟩,
div_zero]
/-- The Hurwitz zeta function is differentiable everywhere except at `s = 1`. This is true
even in the delicate case `a = 0` and `s = 0` (where the completed zeta has a pole, but this is
cancelled out by the Gamma factor). -/
lemma differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (hurwitzZetaEven a) s := by
have := differentiableAt_update_of_residue
(fun t ht ht' ↦ differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven a (Or.inl ht) ht')
(completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_zero a) s hs'
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ite_mul, zero_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv] at this
exact this
lemma hurwitzZetaEven_residue_one (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * hurwitzZetaEven a s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) := by
have : Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) := by
simpa only [Gammaℝ_one, inv_one, mul_one] using (completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one a).mul
<| (differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.continuous.tendsto _).mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
refine this.congr' ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_nhdsWithin one_ne_zero] with s hs
simp [hurwitzZetaEven_def_of_ne_or_ne (Or.inr hs), mul_div_assoc]
lemma differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_one_div (a : UnitAddCircle) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ (fun s ↦ hurwitzZetaEven a s - 1 / (s - 1) / Gammaℝ s) 1 := by
suffices DifferentiableAt ℂ
(fun s ↦ completedHurwitzZetaEven a s / Gammaℝ s - 1 / (s - 1) / Gammaℝ s) 1 by
apply this.congr_of_eventuallyEq
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_nhds one_ne_zero] with x hx
rw [hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne hx]
simp_rw [← sub_div, div_eq_mul_inv _ (Gammaℝ _)]
refine DifferentiableAt.mul ?_ differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.differentiableAt
simp_rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, sub_sub, add_assoc]
conv => enter [2, s, 2]; rw [← neg_sub, div_neg, neg_add_cancel, add_zero]
exact (differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a _).sub
<| (differentiableAt_const _).div differentiableAt_id one_ne_zero
/-- Expression for `hurwitzZetaEven a 1` as a limit. (Mathematically `hurwitzZetaEven a 1` is
undefined, but our construction assigns some value to it; this lemma is mostly of interest for
determining what that value is). -/
lemma tendsto_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_one_div_nhds_one (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ hurwitzZetaEven a s - 1 / (s - 1) / Gammaℝ s) (𝓝 1)
(𝓝 (hurwitzZetaEven a 1)) := by
simpa using (differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_one_div a).continuousAt.tendsto
lemma differentiable_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_hurwitzZetaEven (a b : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (fun s ↦ hurwitzZetaEven a s - hurwitzZetaEven b s) := by
intro z
rcases ne_or_eq z 1 with hz | rfl
· exact (differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven a hz).sub (differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven b hz)
· convert (differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_one_div a).sub
(differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven_sub_one_div b) using 2 with s
abel
/--
Formula for `hurwitzZetaEven` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℤ`.
-/
lemma hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ 1 / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (hurwitzZetaEven a s) := by
rw [hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne (ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs)]
| have := (hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaEven a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ s)
exact this.congr_fun fun n ↦ by simp only [div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _),
div_self (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hs))]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaEven` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version with absolute values) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaEven (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (1 / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s + 1 / (↑|n + 1 - a| : ℂ) ^ s) / 2)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaEven.lean | 664 | 671 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
/-!
# The `arctan` function.
Inequalities, identities and `Real.tan` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)`
and the whole line.
The result of `arctan x + arctan y` is given by `arctan_add`, `arctan_add_eq_add_pi` or
`arctan_add_eq_sub_pi` depending on whether `x * y < 1` and `0 < x`. As an application of
`arctan_add` we give four Machin-like formulas (linear combinations of arctangents equal to
`π / 4 = arctan 1`), including John Machin's original one at
`four_mul_arctan_inv_5_sub_arctan_inv_239`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
| have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 52 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Yaël Dillies, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.NatCast
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Ordered rings and semirings
This file develops the basics of ordered (semi)rings.
Each typeclass here comprises
* an algebraic class (`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`)
* an order class (`PartialOrder`, `LinearOrder`)
* assumptions on how both interact ((strict) monotonicity, canonicity)
For short,
* "`+` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of addition"
* "`+` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of addition"
* "`*` respects `≤`" means "monotonicity of multiplication by a nonnegative number".
* "`*` respects `<`" means "strict monotonicity of multiplication by a positive number".
## Typeclasses
* `OrderedSemiring`: Semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect `≤`.
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respects
`<`.
* `OrderedCommSemiring`: Commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+` and `*` respect
`≤`.
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a partial order such that `+`
and `*` respect `<`.
* `OrderedRing`: Ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `OrderedCommRing`: Commutative ring with a partial order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`: Nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and
`*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`: Nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such that `+`
respects `≤` and `*` respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedRing`: Nontrivial ring with a linear order such that `+` respects `≤` and `*`
respects `<`.
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`: Nontrivial commutative ring with a linear order such that `+` respects
`≤` and `*` respects `<`.
## Hierarchy
The hardest part of proving order lemmas might be to figure out the correct generality and its
corresponding typeclass. Here's an attempt at demystifying it. For each typeclass, we list its
immediate predecessors and what conditions are added to each of them.
* `OrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `≤`
- `Semiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `≤`
* `StrictOrderedSemiring`
- `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommSemiring`
- `OrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `CommSemiring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedRing`
- `OrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `OrderedSemiring` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `OrderedCommRing`
- `OrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & partial order structure & `+` respects `≤` & `*` respects `<`
* `StrictOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `StrictOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `OrderedCommRing` & `+` respects `<` & `*` respects `<` & nontriviality
* `LinearOrderedSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid` & multiplication & nontriviality & `*` respects `<`
* `LinearOrderedCommSemiring`
- `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & commutativity of multiplication
* `LinearOrderedRing`
- `StrictOrderedRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedSemiring` & additive inverses
- `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup` & multiplication & `*` respects `<`
- `Ring` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
* `LinearOrderedCommRing`
- `StrictOrderedCommRing` & totality of the order
- `LinearOrderedRing` & commutativity of multiplication
- `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` & additive inverses
- `CommRing` & `IsDomain` & linear order structure
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidHom
open Function
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
-- TODO: assume weaker typeclasses
/-- An ordered semiring is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
class IsOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R where
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
/-- A strict ordered semiring is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
class IsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*) [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] extends
IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid R, ZeroLEOneClass R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the left
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `c * a < c * b`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a < b` on the right
by a positive element `0 < c` to obtain `a * c < b * c`. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toZeroLEOneClass
attribute [instance 100] IsStrictOrderedRing.toNontrivial
lemma IsOrderedRing.of_mul_nonneg [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] (mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b) :
IsOrderedRing R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ hc (sub_nonneg.2 ab)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using mul_nonneg _ _ (sub_nonneg.2 ab) hc
lemma IsStrictOrderedRing.of_mul_pos [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedAddMonoid R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [Nontrivial R] (mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b) :
IsStrictOrderedRing R where
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [mul_sub, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ hc (sub_pos.2 ab)
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right a b c ab hc := by
simpa only [sub_mul, sub_pos] using mul_pos _ _ (sub_pos.2 ab) hc
section IsOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toPosMulMono : PosMulMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ h x.2
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsOrderedRing.toMulPosMono : MulPosMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsOrderedRing.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ h x.2
end IsOrderedRing
/-- Turn an ordered domain into a strict ordered ring. -/
lemma IsOrderedRing.toIsStrictOrderedRing (R : Type*)
[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
IsStrictOrderedRing R :=
.of_mul_pos fun _ _ ap bp ↦ (mul_nonneg ap.le bp.le).lt_of_ne' (mul_ne_zero ap.ne' bp.ne')
section IsStrictOrderedRing
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toPosMulStrictMono : PosMulStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) IsStrictOrderedRing.toMulPosStrictMono : MulPosStrictMono R where
elim x _ _ h := IsStrictOrderedRing.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right _ _ _ h x.prop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing R where
__ := ‹IsStrictOrderedRing R›
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toCharZero :
CharZero R where
cast_injective :=
(strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n ↦ by rw [Nat.cast_succ]; apply lt_add_one).injective
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.toNoMaxOrder : NoMaxOrder R :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a + 1, lt_add_of_pos_right _ one_pos⟩⟩
end IsStrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrder
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors R where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab := by
contrapose! hab
obtain ha | ha := hab.1.lt_or_lt <;> obtain hb | hb := hab.2.lt_or_lt
exacts [(mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha hb).ne', (mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos ha hb).ne,
(mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ha hb).ne, (mul_pos ha hb).ne']
-- Note that we can't use `NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain` since we are merely in a semiring.
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain : IsDomain R where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero {a b c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_left ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_left_of_pos ha).injective h]
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero {b a c} ha h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.lt_or_lt
exacts [(strictAnti_mul_right ha).injective h, (strictMono_mul_right_of_pos ha).injective h]
end LinearOrder
/-! Note that `OrderDual` does not satisfy any of the ordered ring typeclasses due to the
`zero_le_one` field. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedSemiring` is a semiring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedAddCommMonoid R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered semiring. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the left
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `c * a ≤ c * b`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → c * a ≤ c * b
/-- In an ordered semiring, we can multiply an inequality `a ≤ b` on the right
by a non-negative element `0 ≤ c` to obtain `a * c ≤ b * c`. -/
protected mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right : ∀ a b c : R, a ≤ b → 0 ≤ c → a * c ≤ b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends OrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R where
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right a b c ha hc :=
-- parentheses ensure this generates an `optParam` rather than an `autoParam`
(by simpa only [mul_comm] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left a b c ha hc)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any ordered ring. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of non-negative elements is non-negative. -/
protected mul_nonneg : ∀ a b : R, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- An `OrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is monotone
and multiplication by a nonnegative number is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends OrderedRing R, CommRing R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid R,
Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered semiring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : (0 : R) ≤ 1
/-- Left multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → c * a < c * b
/-- Right multiplication by a positive element is strictly monotone. -/
protected mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right : ∀ a b c : R, a < b → 0 < c → a * c < b * c
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommSemiring` is a commutative semiring with a partial order such that
addition is strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R, CommSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedRing` is a ring with a partial order such that addition is strictly monotone
and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends Ring R, OrderedAddCommGroup R, Nontrivial R where
/-- In a strict ordered ring, `0 ≤ 1`. -/
protected zero_le_one : 0 ≤ (1 : R)
/-- The product of two positive elements is positive. -/
protected mul_pos : ∀ a b : R, 0 < a → 0 < b → 0 < a * b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `StrictOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a partial order such that addition is
strictly monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure StrictOrderedCommRing (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedRing R, CommRing R
/- It's not entirely clear we should assume `Nontrivial` at this point; it would be reasonable to
explore changing this, but be warned that the instances involving `Domain` may cause typeclass
search loops. -/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedSemiring` is a nontrivial semiring with a linear order such that
addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedSemiring (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedSemiring R,
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommSemiring` is a nontrivial commutative semiring with a linear order such
that addition is monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommSemiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommSemiring (R : Type*) extends StrictOrderedCommSemiring R,
LinearOrderedSemiring R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedRing` is a ring with a linear order such that addition is monotone and
multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedRing (R : Type u) extends StrictOrderedRing R, LinearOrder R
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A `LinearOrderedCommRing` is a commutative ring with a linear order such that addition is
monotone and multiplication by a positive number is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommRing (R : Type u) extends LinearOrderedRing R, CommMonoid R
attribute [nolint docBlame]
StrictOrderedSemiring.toOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
StrictOrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
LinearOrderedSemiring.toLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
LinearOrderedRing.toLinearOrder
OrderedSemiring.toOrderedAddCommMonoid
OrderedCommSemiring.toCommSemiring
StrictOrderedCommRing.toCommRing
OrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
OrderedCommRing.toCommRing
StrictOrderedRing.toOrderedAddCommGroup
LinearOrderedCommSemiring.toLinearOrderedSemiring
LinearOrderedCommRing.toCommMonoid
section OrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b c : R}
lemma one_add_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : a + b + b * c ≤ c) : 1 + a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_add_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : a + c + b * c ≤ b) : 1 + a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, le_sub_iff_add_le, add_assoc, ← add_assoc a]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_sub_mul_one_add (h : b + b * c ≤ a + c) : 1 - a ≤ (1 - b) * (1 + c) := by
rw [one_sub_mul, mul_one_add, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm c]
gcongr
lemma one_sub_le_one_add_mul_one_sub (h : c + b * c ≤ a + b) : 1 - a ≤ (1 + b) * (1 - c) := by
rw [mul_one_sub, one_add_mul, sub_le_sub_iff, add_assoc, add_comm b]
gcongr
end OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Defs.lean | 694 | 695 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,690 | 1,690 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Adjunction
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.HasLocalization
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Pi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Limits
/-! The localized category has finite products
In this file, it is shown that if `L : C ⥤ D` is
a localization functor for `W : MorphismProperty C` and that
`W` is stable under finite products, then `D` has finite
products, and `L` preserves finite products.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
namespace Localization
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (L : C ⥤ D)
{W : MorphismProperty C} [L.IsLocalization W]
namespace HasProductsOfShapeAux
variable {J : Type} [HasProductsOfShape J C]
(hW : W.IsStableUnderProductsOfShape J)
include hW
lemma inverts :
(W.functorCategory (Discrete J)).IsInvertedBy (lim ⋙ L) :=
fun _ _ f hf => Localization.inverts L W _ (hW.limMap f hf)
variable [W.ContainsIdentities] [Finite J]
/-- The (candidate) limit functor for the localized category.
It is induced by `lim ⋙ L : (Discrete J ⥤ C) ⥤ D`. -/
noncomputable abbrev limitFunctor :
(Discrete J ⥤ D) ⥤ D :=
Localization.lift _ (inverts L hW)
((whiskeringRight (Discrete J) C D).obj L)
/-- The functor `limitFunctor L hW` is induced by `lim ⋙ L`. -/
noncomputable def compLimitFunctorIso :
((whiskeringRight (Discrete J) C D).obj L) ⋙ limitFunctor L hW ≅
lim ⋙ L := by
apply Localization.fac
instance :
CatCommSq (Functor.const (Discrete J)) L
((whiskeringRight (Discrete J) C D).obj L) (Functor.const (Discrete J)) where
iso' := (Functor.compConstIso _ _).symm
noncomputable instance :
CatCommSq lim ((whiskeringRight (Discrete J) C D).obj L) L (limitFunctor L hW) where
iso' := (compLimitFunctorIso L hW).symm
/-- The adjunction between the constant functor `D ⥤ (Discrete J ⥤ D)`
and `limitFunctor L hW`. -/
noncomputable def adj :
Functor.const _ ⊣ limitFunctor L hW :=
| constLimAdj.localization L W ((whiskeringRight (Discrete J) C D).obj L)
(W.functorCategory (Discrete J)) (Functor.const _) (limitFunctor L hW)
lemma adj_counit_app (F : Discrete J ⥤ C) :
(adj L hW).counit.app (F ⋙ L) =
(Functor.const (Discrete J)).map ((compLimitFunctorIso L hW).hom.app F) ≫
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/FiniteProducts.lean | 71 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
/-!
# Maps (semi)conjugating a shift to a shift
Denote by $S^1$ the unit circle `UnitAddCircle`.
A common way to study a self-map $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree `1`
is to lift it to a map $\tilde f\colon \mathbb R\to \mathbb R$
such that $\tilde f(x + 1) = \tilde f(x)+1$ for all `x`.
In this file we define a structure and a typeclass
for bundled maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
We use parameters `a` and `b` instead of `1` to accommodate for two use cases:
- maps between circles of different lengths;
- self-maps $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree other than one,
including orientation-reversing maps.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Function Set
/-- A bundled map `f : G → H` such that `f (x + a) = f x + b` for all `x`,
denoted as `f: G →+c[a, b] H`.
One can think about `f` as a lift to `G` of a map between two `AddCircle`s. -/
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
/-- The underlying function of an `AddConstMap`.
Use automatic coercion to function instead. -/
protected toFun : G → H
/-- An `AddConstMap` satisfies `f (x + a) = f x + b`. Use `map_add_const` instead. -/
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
/-- Typeclass for maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
Note that `a` and `b` are `outParam`s,
so one should not add instances like
`[AddConstMapClass F G H a b] : AddConstMapClass F G H (-a) (-b)`. -/
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) [FunLike F G H] : Prop where
/-- A map of `AddConstMapClass` class semiconjugates shift by `a` to the shift by `b`:
`∀ x, f (x + a) = f x + b`. -/
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
/-!
### Properties of `AddConstMapClass` maps
In this section we prove properties like `f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b`.
-/
scoped [AddConstMapClass] attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} [FunLike F G H] {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by simp [← map_add_nsmul]
theorem map_add_one [AddMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x + 1) = f x + b := map_add_const f x
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_add_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + ofNat(n)) = f x + (ofNat(n) : ℕ) • b :=
map_add_nat' f x n
theorem map_add_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_add_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + ofNat(n)) = f x + ofNat(n) := map_add_nat f x n
@[scoped simp]
theorem map_const [AddZeroClass G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
f a = f 0 + b := by
simpa using map_add_const f 0
theorem map_one [AddZeroClass G] [One G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b] (f : F) :
f 1 = f 0 + b :=
map_const f
| @[scoped simp]
theorem map_nsmul_const [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 108 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| Nat.zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {Y} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) {Y} (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun _ hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) {X} (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 y` for all `y` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `t ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `t ×ˢ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set Y} {X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
-- TODO: Is there a way to prove directly the `inf` version and then deduce the `Prod` one ?
-- That would seem a bit more natural.
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ⊓ l := by
have : ∀ f : Filter X, f ⊓ l = comap (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (f ×ˢ l) := fun f ↦ by
simpa only [comap_prod] using congrArg₂ (· ⊓ ·) comap_id.symm comap_id.symm
simp_rw [this, ← comap_iSup, hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup]
theorem IsCompact.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ x ∈ K, l ⊓ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [inf_comm l, hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup]
/-- If `s : Set X` belongs to `𝓝 x ⊓ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `T ∈ l` such that `U ∩ T ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_inf_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l :=
(hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- If `s : Set S` belongs to `l ⊓ 𝓝 x` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `T ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `T ∩ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_inf_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- To show that `∀ y ∈ K, P x y` holds for `x` close enough to `x₀` when `K` is compact,
it is sufficient to show that for all `y₀ ∈ K` there `P x y` holds for `(x, y)` close enough
to `(x₀, y₀)`.
Provided for backwards compatibility,
see `IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall` for a stronger statement.
-/
theorem IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually {x₀ : X} {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K)
{P : X → Y → Prop} (hP : ∀ y ∈ K, ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x₀, y), P z.1 z.2) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ y ∈ K, P x y := by
simp only [nhds_prod_eq, ← eventually_iSup, ← hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup] at hP
exact hP.curry.mono fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhdsSet
theorem isCompact_empty : IsCompact (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf hsf =>
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
theorem isCompact_singleton {x : X} : IsCompact ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf hfa =>
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isCompact (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsCompact s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isCompact_empty fun _ => isCompact_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) : IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'.2 fun l hl => by
rw [Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hs] at hl
| rcases hl with ⟨i, his, hi⟩
rcases (hf i his).ultrafilter_le_nhds _ (le_principal_iff.2 hi) with ⟨x, hxi, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, his, hxi⟩, hlx⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 444 | 446 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Even Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the meromorphic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaEven a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, 1 / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`cosZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / |n| ^ s`.
Note that the term for `n = -a` in the first sum is omitted if `a` is an integer, and the term for
`n = 0` is omitted in the second sum (always).
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
meromorphic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
We also define completed versions of these functions with nicer functional equations (satisfying
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = Gammaℝ s * hurwitzZetaEven a s`, and similarly for `cosZeta`); and
modified versions with a subscript `0`, which are entire functions differing from the above by
multiples of `1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `hurwitzZetaEven` and `cosZeta`: the zeta functions
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven` and `completedCosZeta`: completed variants
* `differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven` and `differentiableAt_cosZeta`:
differentiability away from `s = 1`
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven` and `hasSum_nat_cosZeta`: relation between the zeta functions and
the corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Even Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the even part of the
completed Hurwit zeta function). See `evenKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_evenKernel` for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`. -/
@[irreducible] def evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic
(fun ξ : ℝ ↦ rexp (-π * ξ ^ 2 * x) * re (jacobiTheta₂ (ξ * I * x) (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ
simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, add_mul, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
have : cexp (-↑π * I * ((I * ↑x) + 2 * (↑ξ * I * ↑x))) = rexp (π * (x + 2 * ξ * x)) := by
ring_nf
simp [I_sq]
rw [this, re_ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr
ring).lift a
lemma evenKernel_def (a x : ℝ) :
↑(evenKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x) := by
simp [evenKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
/-- For `x ≤ 0` the defining sum diverges, so the kernel is 0. -/
lemma evenKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : evenKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a' => simp [← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- Cosine Hurwitz zeta kernel. See `cosKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_cosKernel` for expression as a sum. -/
@[irreducible] def cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂ ξ (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂_add_left]).lift a
lemma cosKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(cosKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂ a (I * x) := by
simp [cosKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
lemma cosKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : cosKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- For `a = 0`, both kernels agree. -/
lemma evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero : evenKernel 0 = cosKernel 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def]
@[simp]
lemma evenKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : evenKernel (-a) x = evenKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
@[simp]
lemma cosKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : cosKernel (-a) x = cosKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def]
lemma continuousOn_evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (evenKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (evenKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [evenKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ .mul (by fun_prop) ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a' * I * x) <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a' * I * u, I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma continuousOn_cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (cosKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (cosKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [cosKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ a' <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ ((a' : ℂ), I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma evenKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
evenKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) * cosKernel a (1 / x) := by
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [evenKernel_undef _ hx, cosKernel_undef, mul_zero]
exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos zero_le_one hx
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_functional_equation]
have h1 : I * ↑(1 / x) = -1 / (I * x) := by
push_cast
rw [← div_div, mul_one_div, div_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg]
have hx' : I * x ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero I_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne')
have h2 : a * I * x / (I * x) = a := by
rw [div_eq_iff hx']
ring
have h3 : 1 / (-I * (I * x)) ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) = 1 / ↑(x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [neg_mul, ← mul_assoc, I_mul_I, neg_one_mul, neg_neg,ofReal_cpow hx.le, ofReal_div,
ofReal_one, ofReal_ofNat]
have h4 : -π * I * (a * I * x) ^ 2 / (I * x) = - (-π * a ^ 2 * x) := by
rw [mul_pow, mul_pow, I_sq, div_eq_iff hx']
ring
rw [h1, h2, h3, h4, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm (cexp _), mul_assoc _ (cexp _) (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add, neg_add_cancel, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
end kernel_defs
section asymp
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t)) (evenKernel a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, evenKernel_def]
have (n : ℤ) : cexp (-(π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t)) = cexp (-(π * a ^ 2 * t)) *
jacobiTheta₂_term n (a * I * t) (I * t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
ring_nf
simp
simpa [this] using (hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by simpa)).mul_left _
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(cosKernel a t) := by
rw [cosKernel_def a t]
have (n : ℤ) : cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * cexp (-(π * n ^ 2 * t)) =
jacobiTheta₂_term n a (I * ↑t) := by
rw [jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
ring_nf
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
simpa [this] using hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term _ (by simpa)
/-- Modified version of `hasSum_int_evenKernel` omitting the constant term at `∞`. -/
lemma hasSum_int_evenKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n + a = 0 then 0 else rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * t))
(evenKernel a t - if (a : UnitAddCircle) = 0 then 1 else 0) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable -- speed up instance search for `if / then / else`
simp_rw [AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff, zsmul_one]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := h
simpa [← Int.cast_add, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_evenKernel (k : ℝ) ht) (-k)
· suffices ∀ (n : ℤ), n + a ≠ 0 by simpa [this] using hasSum_int_evenKernel a ht
contrapose! h
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨-n, by simpa [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]⟩
lemma hasSum_int_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ if n = 0 then 0 else cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(↑(cosKernel a t) - 1) := by
simpa using hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht) 0
lemma hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * Real.cos (2 * π * a * (n + 1)) * rexp (-π * (n + 1) ^ 2 * t))
(cosKernel a t - 1) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, ofReal_sub, ofReal_one]
have := (hasSum_int_cosKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
rw [← hasSum_nat_add_iff' 1] at this
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_one, Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Int.cast_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero,
mul_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, Real.exp_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_natCast, neg_sq, ← add_mul, add_sub_assoc, ← sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub,
← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_neg] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.cos, mul_div_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `evenKernel a - L` has exponential decay at `+∞`, where `L = 1` if
`a = 0` and `L = 0` otherwise. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) : ∃ p : ℝ, 0 < p ∧
(evenKernel a · - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0)) =O[atTop] (rexp <| -p * ·) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H b =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_zero_sub b
refine ⟨p, hp, (EventuallyEq.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t h
simp [← (hasSum_int_evenKernel b h).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int]
/-- The function `cosKernel a - 1` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (cosKernel a · - 1) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_zero_sub zero_le_one
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simp only [eq_false_intro one_ne_zero, if_false, sub_zero,
← (hasSum_nat_cosKernel₀ a ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded ((HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 0 1 ht).hasSum.mul_left 2)
intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_zero, one_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_left (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of a FE-pair
-/
/-- A `WeakFEPair` structure with `f = evenKernel a` and `g = cosKernel a`. -/
def hurwitzEvenFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : WeakFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal ∘ evenKernel a
g := ofReal ∘ cosKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_evenKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_cosKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 1 / 2
hk := one_half_pos
ε := 1
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := if a = 0 then 1 else 0
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_evenKernel_sub a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
conv at hv' =>
enter [2, x]; rw [← norm_real, ofReal_sub, apply_ite ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ), ofReal_one, ofReal_zero]
exact hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
g₀ := 1
hg_top r := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_cosKernel_sub a
simpa using isBigO_ofReal_left.mpr <| hp'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hp r).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp [← ofReal_mul, evenKernel_functional_equation, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx)]
@[simp]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm :
(hurwitzEvenFEPair 0).symm = hurwitzEvenFEPair 0 := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair WeakFEPair.symm
congr 1 <;> simp [evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero]
@[simp]
lemma hurwitzEvenFEPair_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) : hurwitzEvenFEPair (-a) = hurwitzEvenFEPair a := by
unfold hurwitzEvenFEPair
congr 1 <;> simp [Function.comp_def]
/-!
## Definition of the completed even Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), 1 / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedHurwitzZetaEven a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a s =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· change completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (1 / (s / 2)) • (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / 2 =
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / s
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero, mul_one_div]
· change (1 / (↑(1 / 2 : ℝ) - s / 2)) • 1 / 2 = 1 / (1 - s)
push_cast
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ← sub_div, div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ two_ne_zero]
/--
The meromorphic function of `s` which agrees with
`Gamma (s / 2) * π ^ (-s / 2) * ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedCosZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ (s / 2)) / 2
/-- The entire function differing from `completedCosZeta a s` by a linear combination of
`1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`. -/
def completedCosZeta₀ (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzEvenFEPair a).symm.Λ₀ (s / 2)) / 2
lemma completedCosZeta_eq (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a s =
completedCosZeta₀ a s - 1 / s - (if a = 0 then 1 else 0) / (1 - s) := by
rw [completedCosZeta, WeakFEPair.Λ, sub_div, sub_div]
congr 1
· rw [completedCosZeta₀, WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, div_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
· simp_rw [WeakFEPair.symm, hurwitzEvenFEPair, push_cast, inv_one, smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm _ (if _ then _ else _), mul_div_assoc, div_div, ← sub_div,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ), mul_one_div]
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
@[simp]
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaEven]
@[simp]
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ (-a) s = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀]
@[simp]
lemma completedCosZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta (-a) s = completedCosZeta a s := by
simp [completedCosZeta]
@[simp]
lemma completedCosZeta₀_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ (-a) s = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
simp [completedCosZeta₀]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed. -/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta₀ a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀, sub_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 : ℂ) = ↑(1 / 2 : ℝ)),
(by rfl : (1 / 2 : ℝ) = (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).k),
(hurwitzEvenFEPair a).functional_equation₀ (s / 2),
(by rfl : (hurwitzEvenFEPair a).ε = 1),
one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
/-- Functional equation for the even Hurwitz zeta function with poles removed (alternative form). -/
lemma completedCosZeta₀_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ a s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
end FEPair
/-!
## Differentiability and residues
-/
section FEPair
/--
| The even Hurwitz completed zeta is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1` (and also at
`s = 0` if `a ≠ 0`)
-/
lemma differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaEven.lean | 400 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountablyGenerated
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ker
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Pi
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Basic
/-!
# The cofinite filter
In this file we define
`Filter.cofinite`: the filter of sets with finite complement
and prove its basic properties. In particular, we prove that for `ℕ` it is equal to `Filter.atTop`.
## TODO
Define filters for other cardinalities of the complement.
-/
open Set Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {l : Filter α}
namespace Filter
/-- The cofinite filter is the filter of subsets whose complements are finite. -/
def cofinite : Filter α :=
comk Set.Finite finite_empty (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ ht.subset hsub) fun _ h _ ↦ h.union
@[simp]
theorem mem_cofinite {s : Set α} : s ∈ @cofinite α ↔ sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ { x | ¬p x }.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasBasis_cofinite : HasBasis cofinite (fun s : Set α => s.Finite) compl :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨fun h => ⟨sᶜ, h, (compl_compl s).subset⟩, fun ⟨_t, htf, hts⟩ =>
htf.subset <| compl_subset_comm.2 hts⟩⟩
instance cofinite_neBot [Infinite α] : NeBot (@cofinite α) :=
hasBasis_cofinite.neBot_iff.2 fun hs => hs.infinite_compl.nonempty
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot_iff : @cofinite α = ⊥ ↔ Finite α := by
simp [← empty_mem_iff_bot, finite_univ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cofinite_eq_bot [Finite α] : @cofinite α = ⊥ := cofinite_eq_bot_iff.2 ‹_›
theorem frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in cofinite, p x) ↔ Set.Infinite { x | p x } := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_cofinite, not_not, Set.Infinite]
lemma frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s) ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.frequently_cofinite⟩ := frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
@[simp]
lemma cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot ↔ s.Infinite :=
frequently_mem_iff_neBot.symm.trans frequently_cofinite_mem_iff_infinite
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Infinite.cofinite_inf_principal_neBot⟩ := cofinite_inf_principal_neBot_iff
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.compl_mem_cofinite {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) : sᶜ ∈ @cofinite α :=
mem_cofinite.2 <| (compl_compl s).symm ▸ hs
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.eventually_cofinite_nmem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
hs.compl_mem_cofinite
theorem _root_.Finset.eventually_cofinite_nmem (s : Finset α) : ∀ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∉ s :=
s.finite_toSet.eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_frequently_cofinite {s : Set α} :
Set.Infinite s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in cofinite, x ∈ s :=
frequently_cofinite_iff_infinite.symm
theorem eventually_cofinite_ne (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in cofinite, a ≠ x :=
(Set.finite_singleton x).eventually_cofinite_nmem
theorem le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, {x}ᶜ ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h x => h (finite_singleton x).compl_mem_cofinite, fun h s (hs : sᶜ.Finite) => ?_⟩
rw [← compl_compl s, ← biUnion_of_singleton sᶜ, compl_iUnion₂, Filter.biInter_mem hs]
exact fun x _ => h x
theorem le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne : l ≤ cofinite ↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ y in l, y ≠ x :=
le_cofinite_iff_compl_singleton_mem
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no top element, then `atTop ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atTop_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] : (atTop : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atTop
/-- If `α` is a preorder with no bottom element, then `atBot ≤ cofinite`. -/
theorem atBot_le_cofinite [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] : (atBot : Filter α) ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr eventually_ne_atBot
theorem comap_cofinite_le (f : α → β) : comap f cofinite ≤ cofinite :=
le_cofinite_iff_eventually_ne.mpr fun x =>
mem_comap.2 ⟨{f x}ᶜ, (finite_singleton _).compl_mem_cofinite, fun _ => ne_of_apply_ne f⟩
/-- The coproduct of the cofinite filters on two types is the cofinite filter on their product. -/
theorem coprod_cofinite : (cofinite : Filter α).coprod (cofinite : Filter β) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprod, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, finite_image_fst_and_snd_iff]
theorem coprodᵢ_cofinite {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] :
(Filter.coprodᵢ fun i => (cofinite : Filter (α i))) = cofinite :=
Filter.coext fun s => by
simp only [compl_mem_coprodᵢ, mem_cofinite, compl_compl, forall_finite_image_eval_iff]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_left : Disjoint cofinite l ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s := by
simp [l.basis_sets.disjoint_iff_right]
theorem disjoint_cofinite_right : Disjoint l cofinite ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Finite s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_cofinite_left
/-- If `l ≥ Filter.cofinite` is a countably generated filter, then `l.ker` is cocountable. -/
theorem countable_compl_ker [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : cofinite ≤ l) : Set.Countable l.kerᶜ := by
rcases exists_antitone_basis l with ⟨s, hs⟩
simp only [hs.ker, iInter_true, compl_iInter]
exact countable_iUnion fun n ↦ Set.Finite.countable <| h <| hs.mem _
/-- If `f` tends to a countably generated filter `l` along `Filter.cofinite`,
then for all but countably many elements, `f x ∈ l.ker`. -/
theorem Tendsto.countable_compl_preimage_ker {f : α → β}
{l : Filter β} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] (h : Tendsto f cofinite l) :
Set.Countable (f ⁻¹' l.ker)ᶜ := by rw [← ker_comap]; exact countable_compl_ker h.le_comap
/-- Given a collection of filters `l i : Filter (α i)` and sets `s i ∈ l i`,
if all but finitely many of `s i` are the whole space,
then their indexed product `Set.pi Set.univ s` belongs to the filter `Filter.pi l`. -/
theorem univ_pi_mem_pi {α : ι → Type*} {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)}
(h : ∀ i, s i ∈ l i) (hfin : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, s i = univ) : univ.pi s ∈ pi l := by
filter_upwards [pi_mem_pi hfin fun i _ ↦ h i] with a ha i _
if hi : s i = univ then
simp [hi]
else
exact ha i hi
/-- Given a family of maps `f i : α i → β i` and a family of filters `l i : Filter (α i)`,
if all but finitely many of `f i` are surjective,
then the indexed product of `f i`s maps the indexed product of the filters `l i`
to the indexed products of their pushforwards under individual `f i`s.
See also `map_piMap_pi_finite` for the case of a finite index type.
-/
theorem map_piMap_pi {α β : ι → Type*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, Surjective (f i)) (l : ∀ i, Filter (α i)) :
map (Pi.map f) (pi l) = pi fun i ↦ map (f i) (l i) := by
refine le_antisymm (tendsto_piMap_pi fun _ ↦ tendsto_map) ?_
refine ((hasBasis_pi fun i ↦ (l i).basis_sets).map _).ge_iff.2 ?_
rintro ⟨I, s⟩ ⟨hI : I.Finite, hs : ∀ i ∈ I, s i ∈ l i⟩
| classical
rw [← univ_pi_piecewise_univ, piMap_image_univ_pi]
refine univ_pi_mem_pi (fun i ↦ ?_) ?_
· by_cases hi : i ∈ I
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Cofinite.lean | 167 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
| map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 547 | 551 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 . All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
/-!
# p-groups
This file contains a proof that if `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`,
then the number of fixed points of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α`.
It also contains proofs of some corollaries of this lemma about existence of fixed points.
-/
open Fintype MulAction
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A p-group is a group in which every element has prime power order -/
def IsPGroup : Prop :=
∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, g ^ p ^ k = 1
variable {p} {G}
namespace IsPGroup
theorem iff_orderOf [hp : Fact p.Prime] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ k :=
forall_congr' fun g =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hk⟩ =>
Exists.imp (fun _ h => h.right)
((Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)),
Exists.imp fun k hk => by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
theorem of_card {n : ℕ} (hG : Nat.card G = p ^ n) : IsPGroup p G := fun g =>
⟨n, by rw [← hG, pow_card_eq_one']⟩
theorem of_bot : IsPGroup p (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
of_card (n := 0) (by rw [Subgroup.card_bot, pow_zero])
theorem iff_card [Fact p.Prime] [Finite G] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card G = p ^ n := by
have hG : Nat.card G ≠ 0 := Nat.card_pos.ne'
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => of_card hn⟩
suffices ∀ q ∈ (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList, q = p by
use (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList.length
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate_of_mem this, Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hG]
intro q hq
obtain ⟨hq1, hq2⟩ := (Nat.mem_primeFactorsList hG).mp hq
haveI : Fact q.Prime := ⟨hq1⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card' q hq2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (iff_orderOf.mp h) g
exact (hq1.pow_eq_iff.mp (hg.symm.trans hk).symm).1.symm
alias ⟨exists_card_eq, _⟩ := iff_card
section GIsPGroup
variable (hG : IsPGroup p G)
include hG
theorem of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : H →* G) (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
simp_rw [IsPGroup, ← hϕ.eq_iff, ϕ.map_pow, ϕ.map_one]
exact fun h => hG (ϕ h)
theorem to_subgroup (H : Subgroup G) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective
theorem of_surjective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G →* H) (hϕ : Function.Surjective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
refine fun h => Exists.elim (hϕ h) fun g hg => Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hG g)
rw [← hg, ← ϕ.map_pow, hk, ϕ.map_one]
theorem to_quotient (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : IsPGroup p (G ⧸ H) :=
hG.of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem of_equiv {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G ≃* H) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_surjective ϕ.toMonoidHom ϕ.surjective
theorem orderOf_coprime {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : (orderOf g).Coprime n :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG g
(hn.pow_left k).coprime_dvd_left (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)
/-- If `gcd(p,n) = 1`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable def powEquiv {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) : G ≃ G :=
let h : ∀ g : G, (Nat.card (Subgroup.zpowers g)).Coprime n := fun g =>
(Nat.card_zpowers g).symm ▸ hG.orderOf_coprime hn g
{ toFun := (· ^ n)
invFun := fun g => (powCoprime (h g)).symm ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩
left_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <|
(powCoprime (h (g ^ n))).left_inv
⟨g, _, Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).left_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩⟩
right_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).right_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : hG.powEquiv hn g = g ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_symm_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) :
(hG.powEquiv hn).symm g = g ^ (orderOf g).gcdB n := by rw [← Nat.card_zpowers]; rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- If `p ∤ n`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable abbrev powEquiv' {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : G ≃ G :=
powEquiv hG (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mpr hn)
theorem index (H : Subgroup G) [H.FiniteIndex] : ∃ n : ℕ, H.index = p ^ n := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp (hG.to_quotient H.normalCore)
obtain ⟨k, _, hk2⟩ :=
(Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ (H.normalCore.index_eq_card.trans hn)).mp
(Subgroup.index_dvd_of_le H.normalCore_le))
exact ⟨k, hk2⟩
theorem card_eq_or_dvd : Nat.card G = 1 ∨ p ∣ Nat.card G := by
cases finite_or_infinite G
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp hG
rw [hn]
rcases n with - | n
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨p ^ n, by rw [pow_succ']⟩
· rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
exact Or.inr ⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_card [Finite G] : Nontrivial G ↔ ∃ n > 0, Nat.card G = p ^ n :=
⟨fun hGnt =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := iff_card.1 hG
⟨k,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hk0 => by
rw [hk0, pow_zero] at hk; exact Finite.one_lt_card.ne' hk,
hk⟩,
fun ⟨_, hk0, hk⟩ =>
Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 <|
hk.symm ▸ one_lt_pow₀ (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt (ne_of_gt hk0)⟩
variable {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
theorem card_orbit (a : α) [Finite (orbit G a)] : ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card (orbit G a) = p ^ n := by
let ϕ := orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G a
haveI := Finite.of_equiv (orbit G a) ϕ
haveI := (stabilizer G a).finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient
rw [Nat.card_congr ϕ]
exact hG.index (stabilizer G a)
variable (α) [Finite α]
/-- If `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`, then the number of fixed points
of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α` -/
theorem card_modEq_card_fixedPoints : Nat.card α ≡ Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) [MOD p] := by
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofFinite (fixedPoints G α)
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
classical
calc
card α = card (Σy : Quotient (orbitRel G α), { x // Quotient.mk'' x = y }) :=
card_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv (@Quotient.mk'' _ (orbitRel G α))).symm
_ = ∑ a : Quotient (orbitRel G α), card { x // Quotient.mk'' x = a } := card_sigma
_ ≡ ∑ _a : fixedPoints G α, 1 [MOD p] := ?_
_ = _ := by simp
rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat p, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_sum]
have key :
∀ x,
card { y // (Quotient.mk'' y : Quotient (orbitRel G α)) = Quotient.mk'' x } =
card (orbit G x) :=
fun x => by simp only [Quotient.eq'']; congr
refine
Eq.symm
(Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero (fun a _ _ => Quotient.mk'' a.1) (fun _ _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _)
(fun a₁ _ _ a₂ _ _ h =>
Subtype.eq (mem_fixedPoints'.mp a₂.2 a₁.1 (Quotient.exact' h)))
(fun b => Quotient.inductionOn' b fun b _ hb => ?_) fun a ha _ => by
rw [key, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.mp a.2])
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG.card_orbit b
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at hk
have : k = 0 := by
contrapose! hb
simp [-Quotient.eq, key, hk, hb]
exact
⟨⟨b, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.2 <| by rw [hk, this, pow_zero]⟩,
Finset.mem_univ _, ne_of_eq_of_ne Nat.cast_one one_ne_zero, rfl⟩
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is not a multiple
of `p` then the action has a fixed point. -/
theorem nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card (α) [MulAction G α] (hpα : ¬p ∣ Nat.card α) :
(fixedPoints G α).Nonempty :=
have : Finite α := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (fun h ↦ (h ▸ hpα) (dvd_zero p))
@Set.Nonempty.of_subtype _ _
(by
rw [← Finite.card_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hpα
rw [← Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, ← hpα]
exact hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α)
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is a multiple
of `p`, and the action has one fixed point, then it has another fixed point. -/
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point (hpα : p ∣ Nat.card α) {a : α}
(ha : a ∈ fixedPoints G α) : ∃ b, b ∈ fixedPoints G α ∧ a ≠ b := by
have hpf : p ∣ Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) :=
Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp ((hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α).symm.trans hpα.modEq_zero_nat)
have hα : 1 < Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) :=
(Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt.trans_le (Nat.le_of_dvd (Finite.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) hpf)
rw [Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial] at hα
exact
let ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, hba⟩ := exists_ne (⟨a, ha⟩ : fixedPoints G α)
⟨b, hb, fun hab => hba (by simp_rw [hab])⟩
theorem center_nontrivial [Nontrivial G] [Finite G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup.center G) := by
classical
have := (hG.of_equiv ConjAct.toConjAct).exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point G
rw [ConjAct.fixedPoints_eq_center] at this
have dvd : p ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨n, hn0, hn⟩ := hG.nontrivial_iff_card.mp inferInstance
exact hn.symm ▸ dvd_pow_self _ (ne_of_gt hn0)
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := this dvd (Subgroup.center G).one_mem
exact ⟨⟨1, ⟨g, hg.1⟩, mt Subtype.ext_iff.mp hg.2⟩⟩
theorem bot_lt_center [Nontrivial G] [Finite G] : ⊥ < Subgroup.center G := by
haveI := center_nontrivial hG
classical exact
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ((Subgroup.center G).one_lt_card_iff_ne_bot.mp Finite.one_lt_card)
end GIsPGroup
theorem to_le {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : IsPGroup p K) (hHK : H ≤ K) : IsPGroup p H :=
hK.of_injective (Subgroup.inclusion hHK) fun a b h =>
Subtype.ext (by
change ((Subgroup.inclusion hHK) a : G) = (Subgroup.inclusion hHK) b
apply Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
theorem to_inf_left {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) : IsPGroup p (H ⊓ K : Subgroup G) :=
hH.to_le inf_le_left
theorem to_inf_right {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : IsPGroup p K) : IsPGroup p (H ⊓ K : Subgroup G) :=
hK.to_le inf_le_right
theorem map {H : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) {K : Type*} [Group K] (ϕ : G →* K) :
IsPGroup p (H.map ϕ) := by
rw [← H.range_subtype, MonoidHom.map_range]
exact hH.of_surjective (ϕ.restrict H).rangeRestrict (ϕ.restrict H).rangeRestrict_surjective
theorem comap_of_ker_isPGroup {H : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) {K : Type*} [Group K]
(ϕ : K →* G) (hϕ : IsPGroup p ϕ.ker) : IsPGroup p (H.comap ϕ) := by
intro g
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hH ⟨ϕ g.1, g.2⟩
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, H.coe_pow, Subtype.coe_mk, ← ϕ.map_pow] at hj
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hϕ ⟨g.1 ^ p ^ j, hj⟩
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, ϕ.ker.coe_pow, Subtype.coe_mk, ← pow_mul, ← pow_add] at hk
exact ⟨j + k, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, (H.comap ϕ).coe_pow]⟩
theorem ker_isPGroup_of_injective {K : Type*} [Group K] {ϕ : K →* G} (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p ϕ.ker :=
(congr_arg (fun Q : Subgroup K => IsPGroup p Q) (ϕ.ker_eq_bot_iff.mpr hϕ)).mpr IsPGroup.of_bot
theorem comap_of_injective {H : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) {K : Type*} [Group K] (ϕ : K →* G)
(hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) : IsPGroup p (H.comap ϕ) :=
hH.comap_of_ker_isPGroup ϕ (ker_isPGroup_of_injective hϕ)
theorem comap_subtype {H : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) {K : Subgroup G} :
IsPGroup p (H.comap K.subtype) :=
hH.comap_of_injective K.subtype Subtype.coe_injective
theorem to_sup_of_normal_right {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) (hK : IsPGroup p K)
[K.Normal] : IsPGroup p (H ⊔ K : Subgroup G) := by
rw [← QuotientGroup.ker_mk' K, ← Subgroup.comap_map_eq]
apply (hH.map (QuotientGroup.mk' K)).comap_of_ker_isPGroup
rwa [QuotientGroup.ker_mk']
theorem to_sup_of_normal_left {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) (hK : IsPGroup p K)
[H.Normal] : IsPGroup p (H ⊔ K : Subgroup G) := sup_comm H K ▸ to_sup_of_normal_right hK hH
theorem to_sup_of_normal_right' {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : IsPGroup p H) (hK : IsPGroup p K)
(hHK : H ≤ K.normalizer) : IsPGroup p (H ⊔ K : Subgroup G) :=
let hHK' :=
| to_sup_of_normal_right (hH.of_equiv (Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe hHK).symm)
(hK.of_equiv (Subgroup.subgroupOfEquivOfLe Subgroup.le_normalizer).symm)
((congr_arg (fun H : Subgroup K.normalizer => IsPGroup p H)
(Subgroup.sup_subgroupOf_eq hHK Subgroup.le_normalizer)).mp
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PGroup.lean | 279 | 282 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Discrete.Basic
/-!
# The monoidal coherence theorem
In this file, we prove the monoidal coherence theorem, stated in the following form: the free
monoidal category over any type `C` is thin.
We follow a proof described by Ilya Beylin and Peter Dybjer, which has been previously formalized
in the proof assistant ALF. The idea is to declare a normal form (with regard to association and
adding units) on objects of the free monoidal category and consider the discrete subcategory of
objects that are in normal form. A normalization procedure is then just a functor
`fullNormalize : FreeMonoidalCategory C ⥤ Discrete (NormalMonoidalObject C)`, where
functoriality says that two objects which are related by associators and unitors have the
same normal form. Another desirable property of a normalization procedure is that an object is
isomorphic (i.e., related via associators and unitors) to its normal form. In the case of the
specific normalization procedure we use we not only get these isomorphisms, but also that they
assemble into a natural isomorphism `𝟭 (FreeMonoidalCategory C) ≅ fullNormalize ⋙ inclusion`.
But this means that any two parallel morphisms in the free monoidal category factor through a
discrete category in the same way, so they must be equal, and hence the free monoidal category
is thin.
## References
* [Ilya Beylin and Peter Dybjer, Extracting a proof of coherence for monoidal categories from a
proof of normalization for monoids][beylin1996]
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
open MonoidalCategory
namespace FreeMonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u}
section
variable (C)
/-- We say an object in the free monoidal category is in normal form if it is of the form
`(((𝟙_ C) ⊗ X₁) ⊗ X₂) ⊗ ⋯`. -/
inductive NormalMonoidalObject : Type u
| unit : NormalMonoidalObject
| tensor : NormalMonoidalObject → C → NormalMonoidalObject
end
local notation "F" => FreeMonoidalCategory
local notation "N" => Discrete ∘ NormalMonoidalObject
local infixr:10 " ⟶ᵐ " => Hom
-- Porting note: this was automatic in mathlib 3
instance (x y : N C) : Subsingleton (x ⟶ y) := Discrete.instSubsingletonDiscreteHom _ _
/-- Auxiliary definition for `inclusion`. -/
@[simp]
def inclusionObj : NormalMonoidalObject C → F C
| NormalMonoidalObject.unit => unit
| NormalMonoidalObject.tensor n a => tensor (inclusionObj n) (of a)
/-- The discrete subcategory of objects in normal form includes into the free monoidal category. -/
def inclusion : N C ⥤ F C :=
Discrete.functor inclusionObj
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_obj (X : N C) :
inclusion.obj X = inclusionObj X.as :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_map {X Y : N C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
inclusion.map f = eqToHom (congr_arg _ (Discrete.ext (Discrete.eq_of_hom f))) := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
cases Discrete.ext (by assumption)
apply inclusion.map_id
/-- Auxiliary definition for `normalize`. -/
def normalizeObj : F C → NormalMonoidalObject C → NormalMonoidalObject C
| unit, n => n
| of X, n => NormalMonoidalObject.tensor n X
| tensor X Y, n => normalizeObj Y (normalizeObj X n)
@[simp]
theorem normalizeObj_unitor (n : NormalMonoidalObject C) : normalizeObj (𝟙_ (F C)) n = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem normalizeObj_tensor (X Y : F C) (n : NormalMonoidalObject C) :
normalizeObj (X ⊗ Y) n = normalizeObj Y (normalizeObj X n) :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition for `normalize`. -/
def normalizeObj' (X : F C) : N C ⥤ N C := Discrete.functor fun n ↦ ⟨normalizeObj X n⟩
section
open Hom
/-- Auxiliary definition for `normalize`. Here we prove that objects that are related by
associators and unitors map to the same normal form. -/
@[simp]
def normalizeMapAux : ∀ {X Y : F C}, (X ⟶ᵐ Y) → (normalizeObj' X ⟶ normalizeObj' Y)
| _, _, Hom.id _ => 𝟙 _
| _, _, α_hom X Y Z => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, α_inv _ _ _ => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, l_hom _ => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, l_inv _ => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, ρ_hom _ => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, ρ_inv _ => by dsimp; exact Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => 𝟙 _)
| _, _, (@comp _ _ _ _ f g) => normalizeMapAux f ≫ normalizeMapAux g
| _, _, (@Hom.tensor _ T _ _ W f g) =>
Discrete.natTrans <| fun ⟨X⟩ => (normalizeMapAux g).app ⟨normalizeObj T X⟩ ≫
(normalizeObj' W).map ((normalizeMapAux f).app ⟨X⟩)
| _, _, (@Hom.whiskerLeft _ T _ W f) =>
Discrete.natTrans <| fun ⟨X⟩ => (normalizeMapAux f).app ⟨normalizeObj T X⟩
| _, _, (@Hom.whiskerRight _ T _ f W) =>
Discrete.natTrans <| fun X => (normalizeObj' W).map <| (normalizeMapAux f).app X
end
section
variable (C)
/-- Our normalization procedure works by first defining a functor `F C ⥤ (N C ⥤ N C)` (which turns
out to be very easy), and then obtain a functor `F C ⥤ N C` by plugging in the normal object
`𝟙_ C`. -/
@[simp]
def normalize : F C ⥤ N C ⥤ N C where
obj X := normalizeObj' X
map {X Y} := Quotient.lift normalizeMapAux (by aesop_cat)
/-- A variant of the normalization functor where we consider the result as an object in the free
monoidal category (rather than an object of the discrete subcategory of objects in normal
form). -/
@[simp]
def normalize' : F C ⥤ N C ⥤ F C :=
normalize C ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj inclusion
/-- The normalization functor for the free monoidal category over `C`. -/
def fullNormalize : F C ⥤ N C where
obj X := ((normalize C).obj X).obj ⟨NormalMonoidalObject.unit⟩
map f := ((normalize C).map f).app ⟨NormalMonoidalObject.unit⟩
/-- Given an object `X` of the free monoidal category and an object `n` in normal form, taking
the tensor product `n ⊗ X` in the free monoidal category is functorial in both `X` and `n`. -/
@[simp]
def tensorFunc : F C ⥤ N C ⥤ F C where
obj X := Discrete.functor fun n => inclusion.obj ⟨n⟩ ⊗ X
map f := Discrete.natTrans (fun _ => _ ◁ f)
theorem tensorFunc_map_app {X Y : F C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (n) : ((tensorFunc C).map f).app n = _ ◁ f :=
rfl
theorem tensorFunc_obj_map (Z : F C) {n n' : N C} (f : n ⟶ n') :
((tensorFunc C).obj Z).map f = inclusion.map f ▷ Z := by
cases n
cases n'
rcases f with ⟨⟨h⟩⟩
dsimp at h
subst h
simp
/-- Auxiliary definition for `normalizeIso`. Here we construct the isomorphism between
`n ⊗ X` and `normalize X n`. -/
@[simp]
def normalizeIsoApp :
∀ (X : F C) (n : N C), ((tensorFunc C).obj X).obj n ≅ ((normalize' C).obj X).obj n
| of _, _ => Iso.refl _
| unit, _ => ρ_ _
| tensor X a, n =>
(α_ _ _ _).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (normalizeIsoApp X n) a ≪≫ normalizeIsoApp _ _
/-- Almost non-definitionally equal to `normalizeIsoApp`, but has a better definitional property
in the proof of `normalize_naturality`. -/
@[simp]
def normalizeIsoApp' :
∀ (X : F C) (n : NormalMonoidalObject C), inclusionObj n ⊗ X ≅ inclusionObj (normalizeObj X n)
| of _, _ => Iso.refl _
| unit, _ => ρ_ _
| tensor X Y, n =>
(α_ _ _ _).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (normalizeIsoApp' X n) Y ≪≫ normalizeIsoApp' _ _
theorem normalizeIsoApp_eq :
∀ (X : F C) (n : N C), normalizeIsoApp C X n = normalizeIsoApp' C X n.as
| of _, _ => rfl
| unit, _ => rfl
| tensor X Y, n => by
rw [normalizeIsoApp, normalizeIsoApp']
rw [normalizeIsoApp_eq X n]
rw [normalizeIsoApp_eq Y ⟨normalizeObj X n.as⟩]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem normalizeIsoApp_tensor (X Y : F C) (n : N C) :
normalizeIsoApp C (X ⊗ Y) n =
(α_ _ _ _).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (normalizeIsoApp C X n) Y ≪≫ normalizeIsoApp _ _ _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem normalizeIsoApp_unitor (n : N C) : normalizeIsoApp C (𝟙_ (F C)) n = ρ_ _ :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition for `normalizeIso`. -/
@[simps!]
def normalizeIsoAux (X : F C) : (tensorFunc C).obj X ≅ (normalize' C).obj X :=
NatIso.ofComponents (normalizeIsoApp C X)
(by
rintro ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨f⟩⟩
dsimp at f
subst f
dsimp
simp)
section
variable {C}
theorem normalizeObj_congr (n : NormalMonoidalObject C) {X Y : F C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
normalizeObj X n = normalizeObj Y n := by
rcases f with ⟨f'⟩
apply @congr_fun _ _ fun n => normalizeObj X n
clear n f
induction f' with
| comp _ _ _ _ => apply Eq.trans <;> assumption
| whiskerLeft _ _ ih => funext; apply congr_fun ih
| whiskerRight _ _ ih => funext; apply congr_arg₂ _ rfl (congr_fun ih _)
| @tensor W X Y Z _ _ ih₁ ih₂ =>
funext n
simp [congr_fun ih₁ n, congr_fun ih₂ (normalizeObj Y n)]
| _ => funext; rfl
theorem normalize_naturality (n : NormalMonoidalObject C) {X Y : F C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
inclusionObj n ◁ f ≫ (normalizeIsoApp' C Y n).hom =
(normalizeIsoApp' C X n).hom ≫
inclusion.map (eqToHom (Discrete.ext (normalizeObj_congr n f))) := by
revert n
induction f using Hom.inductionOn
case comp f g ihf ihg => simp [ihg, reassoc_of% (ihf _)]
case whiskerLeft X' X Y f ih =>
intro n
dsimp only [normalizeObj_tensor, normalizeIsoApp', tensor_eq_tensor, Iso.trans_hom,
Iso.symm_hom, whiskerRightIso_hom, Function.comp_apply, inclusion_obj]
rw [associator_inv_naturality_right_assoc, whisker_exchange_assoc, ih]
simp
case whiskerRight X Y h η' ih =>
intro n
dsimp only [normalizeObj_tensor, normalizeIsoApp', tensor_eq_tensor, Iso.trans_hom,
Iso.symm_hom, whiskerRightIso_hom, Function.comp_apply, inclusion_obj]
rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle_assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, ih]
have := dcongr_arg (fun x => (normalizeIsoApp' C η' x).hom) (normalizeObj_congr n h)
simp [this]
all_goals simp
end
/-- The isomorphism between `n ⊗ X` and `normalize X n` is natural (in both `X` and `n`, but
naturality in `n` is trivial and was "proved" in `normalizeIsoAux`). This is the real heart
of our proof of the coherence theorem. -/
def normalizeIso : tensorFunc C ≅ normalize' C :=
NatIso.ofComponents (normalizeIsoAux C) <| by
intro X Y f
ext ⟨n⟩
convert normalize_naturality n f using 1
any_goals dsimp; rw [normalizeIsoApp_eq]
rfl
/-- The isomorphism between an object and its normal form is natural. -/
def fullNormalizeIso : 𝟭 (F C) ≅ fullNormalize C ⋙ inclusion :=
NatIso.ofComponents
| (fun X => (λ_ X).symm ≪≫ ((normalizeIso C).app X).app ⟨NormalMonoidalObject.unit⟩)
(by
intro X Y f
dsimp
rw [leftUnitor_inv_naturality_assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.cancel_iso_inv_left]
exact
congr_arg (fun f => NatTrans.app f (Discrete.mk NormalMonoidalObject.unit))
((normalizeIso.{u} C).hom.naturality f))
end
/-- The monoidal coherence theorem. -/
instance subsingleton_hom : Quiver.IsThin (F C) := fun X Y =>
⟨fun f g => by
have hfg : (fullNormalize C).map f = (fullNormalize C).map g := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have hf := NatIso.naturality_2 (fullNormalizeIso.{u} C) f
have hg := NatIso.naturality_2 (fullNormalizeIso.{u} C) g
exact hf.symm.trans (Eq.trans (by simp only [Functor.comp_map, hfg]) hg)⟩
section Groupoid
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Free/Coherence.lean | 285 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.ConcreteSheafification
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.Image
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.Sieves
/-!
# Subsheaf of types
We define the sub(pre)sheaf of a type valued presheaf.
## Main results
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf` :
A subpresheaf of a presheaf of types.
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafify` :
The sheafification of a subpresheaf as a subpresheaf. Note that this is a sheaf only when the
whole sheaf is.
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafify_isSheaf` :
The sheafification is a sheaf
- `CategoryTheory.Subpresheaf.sheafifyLift` :
The descent of a map into a sheaf to the sheafification.
- `CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.imageSheaf` : The image sheaf of a morphism.
- `CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.imageFactorization` : The image sheaf as a
`Limits.imageFactorization`.
-/
universe w v u
open Opposite CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {F F' F'' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (G G' : Subpresheaf F)
/-- The sheafification of a subpresheaf as a subpresheaf.
Note that this is a sheaf only when the whole presheaf is a sheaf. -/
def Subpresheaf.sheafify : Subpresheaf F where
obj U := { s | G.sieveOfSection s ∈ J (unop U) }
map := by
rintro U V i s hs
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.pullback_stable i.unop hs)
intro _ _ h
dsimp at h ⊢
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
theorem Subpresheaf.le_sheafify : G ≤ G.sheafify J := by
intro U s hs
change _ ∈ J _
convert J.top_mem U.unop -- Porting note: `U.unop` can not be inferred now
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro V i -
exact G.map i.op hs
variable {J}
theorem Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) (hG : Presieve.IsSheaf J G.toPresheaf) :
G = G.sheafify J := by
apply (G.le_sheafify J).antisymm
intro U s hs
suffices ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).1 = s by
rw [← this]
exact ((hG _ hs).amalgamate _ (G.family_of_elements_compatible s)).2
apply (h _ hs).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V i hi
exact (congr_arg Subtype.val ((hG _ hs).valid_glue (G.family_of_elements_compatible s) _ hi) :)
theorem Subpresheaf.sheafify_isSheaf (hF : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
Presieve.IsSheaf J (G.sheafify J).toPresheaf := by
intro U S hS x hx
let S' := Sieve.bind S fun Y f hf => G.sieveOfSection (x f hf).1
have := fun (V) (i : V ⟶ U) (hi : S' i) => hi
-- Porting note: change to explicit variable so that `choose` can find the correct
-- dependent functions. Thus everything follows need two additional explicit variables.
choose W i₁ i₂ hi₂ h₁ h₂ using this
dsimp [-Sieve.bind_apply] at *
let x'' : Presieve.FamilyOfElements F S' := fun V i hi => F.map (i₁ V i hi).op (x _ (hi₂ V i hi))
have H : ∀ s, x.IsAmalgamation s ↔ x''.IsAmalgamation s.1 := by
intro s
constructor
· intro H V i hi
dsimp only [x'']
conv_lhs => rw [← h₂ _ _ hi]
rw [← H _ (hi₂ _ _ hi)]
exact FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply F (i₂ _ _ hi).op (i₁ _ _ hi).op _
· intro H V i hi
refine Subtype.ext ?_
apply (hF _ (x i hi).2).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro V' i' hi'
have hi'' : S' (i' ≫ i) := ⟨_, _, _, hi, hi', rfl⟩
have := H _ hi''
rw [op_comp, F.map_comp] at this
exact this.trans (congr_arg Subtype.val (hx _ _ (hi₂ _ _ hi'') hi (h₂ _ _ hi'')))
have : x''.Compatible := by
intro V₁ V₂ V₃ g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄ S₁ S₂ e
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
exact
congr_arg Subtype.val
(hx (g₁ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₁) (g₂ ≫ i₁ _ _ S₂) (hi₂ _ _ S₁) (hi₂ _ _ S₂)
(by simp only [Category.assoc, h₂, e]))
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := hF _ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2) _ this
refine ⟨⟨t, _⟩, (H ⟨t, ?_⟩).mpr ht, fun y hy => Subtype.ext (ht' _ ((H _).mp hy))⟩
refine J.superset_covering ?_ (J.bind_covering hS fun V i hi => (x i hi).2)
intro V i hi
dsimp
rw [ht _ hi]
exact h₁ _ _ hi
theorem Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify_iff (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
G = G.sheafify J ↔ Presieve.IsSheaf J G.toPresheaf :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ G.sheafify_isSheaf h, G.eq_sheafify h⟩
theorem Subpresheaf.isSheaf_iff (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
Presieve.IsSheaf J G.toPresheaf ↔
∀ (U) (s : F.obj U), G.sieveOfSection s ∈ J (unop U) → s ∈ G.obj U := by
rw [← G.eq_sheafify_iff h]
change _ ↔ G.sheafify J ≤ G
exact ⟨Eq.ge, (G.le_sheafify J).antisymm⟩
theorem Subpresheaf.sheafify_sheafify (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F) :
(G.sheafify J).sheafify J = G.sheafify J :=
((Subpresheaf.eq_sheafify_iff _ h).mpr <| G.sheafify_isSheaf h).symm
/-- The lift of a presheaf morphism onto the sheafification subpresheaf. -/
noncomputable def Subpresheaf.sheafifyLift (f : G.toPresheaf ⟶ F') (h : Presieve.IsSheaf J F') :
(G.sheafify J).toPresheaf ⟶ F' where
app _ s := (h (G.sieveOfSection s.1) s.prop).amalgamate
(_) ((G.family_of_elements_compatible s.1).compPresheafMap f)
naturality := by
intro U V i
ext s
apply (h _ ((Subpresheaf.sheafify J G).toPresheaf.map i s).prop).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro W j hj
refine (Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue (h _ ((G.sheafify J).toPresheaf.map i s).2)
((G.family_of_elements_compatible _).compPresheafMap _) _ hj).trans ?_
| dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
change _ = F'.map (j ≫ i.unop).op _
refine Eq.trans ?_ (Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue (h _ s.2)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Subsheaf.lean | 146 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, David Loeffler, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.CPolynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
/-!
# Derivatives of the Fourier transform
In this file we compute the Fréchet derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`, where `f` is a
function such that both `f` and `v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖` are integrable. Here the Fourier transform is
understood as an operator `(V → E) → (W → E)`, where `V` and `W` are normed `ℝ`-vector spaces
and the Fourier transform is taken with respect to a continuous `ℝ`-bilinear
pairing `L : V × W → ℝ` and a given reference measure `μ`.
We also investigate higher derivatives: Assuming that `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable, we show
that the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^n`.
We also study in a parallel way the Fourier transform of the derivative, which is obtained by
tensoring the Fourier transform of the original function with the bilinear form. We also get
results for iterated derivatives.
A consequence of these results is that, if a function is smooth and all its derivatives are
integrable when multiplied by `‖v‖^k`, then the same goes for its Fourier transform, with
explicit bounds.
We give specialized versions of these results on inner product spaces (where `L` is the scalar
product) and on the real line, where we express the one-dimensional derivative in more concrete
terms, as the Fourier transform of `-2πI x * f x` (or `(-2πI x)^n * f x` for higher derivatives).
## Main definitions and results
We introduce two convenience definitions:
* `VectorFourier.fourierSMulRight L f`: given `f : V → E` and `L` a bilinear pairing
between `V` and `W`, then this is the function `fun v ↦ -(2 * π * I) (L v ⬝) • f v`,
from `V` to `Hom (W, E)`.
This is essentially `ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight`, up to the factor `- 2πI` designed to make
sure that the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier
integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierPowSMulRight` is the higher order analogue for higher derivatives:
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is informally `(-(2 * π * I))^n (L v ⬝)^n • f v`, in
the space of continuous multilinear maps `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
With these definitions, the statements read as follows, first in a general context
(arbitrary `L` and `μ`):
* `VectorFourier.hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable, with
derivative the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f`.
* `VectorFourier.differentiable_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable.
* `VectorFourier.fderiv_fourierIntegral`: formula for the derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_fderiv`: formula for the Fourier integral of the derivative of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` has an explicit Taylor series up to order `N`, given by the Fourier
integrals of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.contDiff_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` is `C^n`.
* `VectorFourier.iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, as the Fourier
integral of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.pow_mul_norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral_le`: explicit bounds for the `n`-th
derivative of the Fourier integral, multiplied by a power function, in terms of corresponding
integrals for the original function.
These statements are then specialized to the case of the usual Fourier transform on
finite-dimensional inner product spaces with their canonical Lebesgue measure (covering in
particular the case of the real line), replacing the namespace `VectorFourier` by
the namespace `Real` in the above statements.
We also give specialized versions of the one-dimensional real derivative (and iterated derivative)
in `Real.deriv_fourierIntegral` and `Real.iteratedDeriv_fourierIntegral`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Complex MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped FourierTransform Topology ContDiff
-- without this local instance, Lean tries first the instance
-- `secondCountableTopologyEither_of_right` (whose priority is 100) and takes a very long time to
-- fail. Since we only use the left instance in this file, we make sure it is tried first.
attribute [local instance 101] secondCountableTopologyEither_of_left
namespace Real
lemma hasDerivAt_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) (2 * π * I * 𝐞 x) x := by
have h1 (y : ℝ) : 𝐞 y = fourier 1 (y : UnitAddCircle) := by
rw [fourierChar_apply, fourier_coe_apply]
push_cast
ring_nf
simpa only [h1, Int.cast_one, ofReal_one, div_one, mul_one] using hasDerivAt_fourier 1 1 x
lemma differentiable_fourierChar : Differentiable ℝ (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) :=
fun x ↦ (Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).differentiableAt
lemma deriv_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : deriv (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) x = 2 * π * I * 𝐞 x :=
(Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).deriv
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ)
|
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L v))) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert (hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg using 1
ext y
simp only [neg_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_neg,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, real_smul, neg_inj]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransformDeriv.lean | 109 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
· simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi ht ((toReal_le_pi θ).lt_of_ne (toReal_eq_pi_iff.not.2 h)))]
theorem coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} (h : 0 ≤ θ.sign) : ↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [abs_eq_self.2 (toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg.2 h), coe_toReal]
theorem neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos {θ : Angle} (h : θ.sign ≤ 0) : -↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [SignType.nonpos_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h)
· rw [abs_of_neg (toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.2 h), coe_neg, neg_neg, coe_toReal]
· rw [sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
theorem eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq {θ ψ : Angle} :
θ = ψ ↔ θ.sign = ψ.sign ∧ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h with ⟨hs, hr⟩
rw [abs_eq_abs] at hr
rcases hr with (hr | hr)
· exact toReal_injective hr
· by_cases h : θ = π
· rw [h, toReal_pi, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal ψ).ne hr)
· by_cases h' : ψ = π
· rw [h', toReal_pi] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal θ).ne hr.symm)
· rw [← sign_toReal h, ← sign_toReal h', hr, Left.sign_neg, SignType.neg_eq_self_iff,
_root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hs
rw [hs, toReal_zero, neg_zero, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hr
rw [hr, hs]
theorem eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : θ.sign = ψ.sign) :
θ = ψ ↔ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by simpa [h] using @eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq θ ψ
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi_div_two : (↑(π / 2) : Angle).sign = 1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, sin_pi_div_two, sign_one]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_neg_pi_div_two : (↑(-π / 2) : Angle).sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, neg_div, Real.sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two, Left.sign_neg, sign_one]
theorem sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
0 ≤ (θ : Angle).sign := by
rw [sign, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_neg_coe_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
(-θ : Angle).sign ≤ 0 := by
rw [sign, sign_nonpos_iff, sin_neg, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
theorem sign_two_nsmul_eq_sign_iff {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).sign = θ.sign ↔ θ = π ∨ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
by_cases hpi : θ = π; · simp [hpi]
rw [or_iff_right hpi]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt, le_abs, le_neg] at hle
have hpi' : θ.toReal ≠ π := by simpa using hpi
rcases hle with (hle | hle) <;> rcases hle.eq_or_lt with (heq | hlt)
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, ← heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, sign_pos (pi_div_two_pos.trans hlt), ← sign_toReal,
two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi.2 hlt, _root_.sign_neg] at h
· simp at h
· rw [← mul_sub]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg two_pos (sub_neg.2 ((toReal_le_pi _).lt_of_ne hpi'))
· intro he
simp [he] at h
· rw [← coe_toReal θ, heq] at h
simp at h
· rw [← sign_toReal hpi, _root_.sign_neg (hlt.trans (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 pi_div_two_pos)), ←
sign_toReal] at h
swap
· intro he
simp [he] at h
rw [← neg_div] at hlt
rw [two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi.2 hlt.le, sign_pos] at h
· simp at h
· linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· have hpi' : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ π := by
rw [Ne, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff, not_or]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp [pi_pos, div_pos, abs_of_pos] at h
· rintro rfl
rw [toReal_neg_pi_div_two] at h
simp [pi_pos, div_pos, neg_div, abs_of_pos] at h
rw [abs_lt, ← neg_div] at h
rw [← sign_toReal hpi, ← sign_toReal hpi', two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul.2 ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩,
sign_mul, sign_pos (zero_lt_two' ℝ), one_mul]
theorem sign_two_zsmul_eq_sign_iff {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).sign = θ.sign ↔ θ = π ∨ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, sign_two_nsmul_eq_sign_iff]
theorem continuousAt_sign {θ : Angle} (h0 : θ ≠ 0) (hpi : θ ≠ π) : ContinuousAt sign θ :=
(continuousAt_sign_of_ne_zero (sin_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨h0, hpi⟩)).comp continuous_sin.continuousAt
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.angle_sign_comp {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → Angle}
{s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : ∀ z ∈ s, f z ≠ 0 ∧ f z ≠ π) :
ContinuousOn (sign ∘ f) s := by
refine (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun θ hθ => ?_).comp hf (Set.mapsTo_image f s)
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hθ
exact continuousAt_sign (hs _ hz).1 (hs _ hz).2
/-- Suppose a function to angles is continuous on a connected set and never takes the values `0`
or `π` on that set. Then the values of the function on that set all have the same sign. -/
theorem sign_eq_of_continuousOn {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → Angle} {s : Set α}
{x y : α} (hc : IsConnected s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : ∀ z ∈ s, f z ≠ 0 ∧ f z ≠ π)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : (f y).sign = (f x).sign :=
(hc.image _ (hf.angle_sign_comp hs)).isPreconnected.subsingleton (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hy)
(Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
end Angle
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 923 | 929 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Equivalences between polynomial rings
This file establishes a number of equivalences between polynomial rings,
based on equivalences between the underlying types.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
## Tags
equivalence, isomorphism, morphism, ring hom, hom
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section Equiv
variable (R) [CommSemiring R]
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a single variable and
polynomials over the ground ring.
-/
@[simps]
def pUnitAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial PUnit R ≃ₐ[R] R[X] where
toFun := eval₂ Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
invFun := Polynomial.eval₂ MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
left_inv := by
let f : R[X] →+* MvPolynomial PUnit R := Polynomial.eval₂RingHom MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
let g : MvPolynomial PUnit R →+* R[X] := eval₂Hom Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
show ∀ p, f.comp g p = p
apply is_id
· ext a
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_C, Polynomial.eval₂_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_X]
right_inv p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun a => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_C, MvPolynomial.eval₂_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_add, MvPolynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq]) fun p n _ => by
rw [Polynomial.eval₂_mul, Polynomial.eval₂_pow, Polynomial.eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]
map_mul' _ _ := eval₂_mul _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
commutes' _ := eval₂_C _ _ _
theorem pUnitAlgEquiv_monomial {d : PUnit →₀ ℕ} {r : R} :
MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R (MvPolynomial.monomial d r)
= Polynomial.monomial (d ()) r := by
simp [Polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
theorem pUnitAlgEquiv_symm_monomial {d : PUnit →₀ ℕ} {r : R} :
(MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R).symm (Polynomial.monomial (d ()) r)
= MvPolynomial.monomial d r := by
simp [MvPolynomial.monomial_eq]
section Map
variable {R} (σ)
/-- If `e : A ≃+* B` is an isomorphism of rings, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapEquiv [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
MvPolynomial σ S₁ ≃+* MvPolynomial σ S₂ :=
{ map (e : S₁ →+* S₂) with
toFun := map (e : S₁ →+* S₂)
invFun := map (e.symm : S₂ →+* S₁)
left_inv := map_leftInverse e.left_inv
right_inv := map_rightInverse e.right_inv }
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv σ (RingEquiv.refl R) = RingEquiv.refl _ :=
RingEquiv.ext map_id
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
(mapEquiv σ e).symm = mapEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_trans [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring S₃] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂)
(f : S₂ ≃+* S₃) : (mapEquiv σ e).trans (mapEquiv σ f) = mapEquiv σ (e.trans f) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun p => by
simp only [RingEquiv.coe_trans, comp_apply, mapEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_trans,
map_map]
variable {A₁ A₂ A₃ : Type*} [CommSemiring A₁] [CommSemiring A₂] [CommSemiring A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
/-- If `e : A ≃ₐ[R] B` is an isomorphism of `R`-algebras, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapAlgEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : MvPolynomial σ A₁ ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ A₂ :=
{ mapAlgHom (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂), mapEquiv σ (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) with toFun := map (e : A₁ →+* A₂) }
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_refl : mapAlgEquiv σ (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext map_id
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (mapAlgEquiv σ e).symm = mapAlgEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_trans (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(mapAlgEquiv σ e).trans (mapAlgEquiv σ f) = mapAlgEquiv σ (e.trans f) := by
ext
simp only [AlgEquiv.trans_apply, mapAlgEquiv_apply, map_map]
rfl
end Map
section Eval
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂_pUnitAlgEquiv_symm {f : Polynomial R} {φ : R →+* S} {a : Unit → S} :
((MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R).symm f : MvPolynomial Unit R).eval₂ φ a =
f.eval₂ φ (a ()) := by
simp only [MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv_symm_apply]
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add f g hf hg => simp [hf, hg]
| monomial n r => simp
theorem eval₂_const_pUnitAlgEquiv_symm {f : Polynomial R} {φ : R →+* S} {a : S} :
((MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R).symm f : MvPolynomial Unit R).eval₂ φ (fun _ ↦ a) =
f.eval₂ φ a := by
rw [eval₂_pUnitAlgEquiv_symm]
theorem eval₂_pUnitAlgEquiv {f : MvPolynomial PUnit R} {φ : R →+* S} {a : PUnit → S} :
((MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R) f : Polynomial R).eval₂ φ (a default) = f.eval₂ φ a := by
simp only [MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv_apply]
induction f using MvPolynomial.induction_on' with
| monomial d r => simp
| add f g hf hg => simp [hf, hg]
theorem eval₂_const_pUnitAlgEquiv {f : MvPolynomial PUnit R} {φ : R →+* S} {a : S} :
((MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv R) f : Polynomial R).eval₂ φ a = f.eval₂ φ (fun _ ↦ a) := by
rw [← eval₂_pUnitAlgEquiv]
end Eval
section
variable (S₁ S₂ S₃)
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
to multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def sumToIter : MvPolynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R →+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
eval₂Hom (C.comp C) fun bc => Sum.recOn bc X (C ∘ X)
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_C (a : R) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xl (b : S₁) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inl b)
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xr (c : S₂) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inr c)
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in one type,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in another type,
to multivariable polynomials in the sum of the two types.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def iterToSum : MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) →+* MvPolynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R :=
eval₂Hom (eval₂Hom C (X ∘ Sum.inr)) (X ∘ Sum.inl)
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_C (a : R) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (C a)) = C a :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_X (b : S₁) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (X b) = X (Sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_X (c : S₂) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (X c)) = X (Sum.inr c) :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
section isEmptyRingEquiv
variable [IsEmpty σ]
variable (σ) in
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
def isEmptyAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] R :=
.ofAlgHom (aeval isEmptyElim) (Algebra.ofId _ _) (by ext) (by ext i m; exact isEmptyElim i)
variable {R S₁} in
@[simp]
lemma aeval_injective_iff_of_isEmpty [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] {f : σ → S₁} :
Function.Injective (aeval f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] S₁) ↔
Function.Injective (algebraMap R S₁) := by
have : aeval f = (Algebra.ofId R S₁).comp (@isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ _ _).toAlgHom := by
ext i
exact IsEmpty.elim' ‹IsEmpty σ› i
rw [this, ← Injective.of_comp_iff' _ (@isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ _ _).bijective]
rfl
variable (σ) in
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps! apply]
def isEmptyRingEquiv : MvPolynomial σ R ≃+* R := (isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ).toRingEquiv
lemma isEmptyRingEquiv_symm_toRingHom : (isEmptyRingEquiv R σ).symm.toRingHom = C := rfl
@[simp] lemma isEmptyRingEquiv_symm_apply (r : R) : (isEmptyRingEquiv R σ).symm r = C r := rfl
lemma isEmptyRingEquiv_eq_coeff_zero {σ R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [IsEmpty σ] {x} :
isEmptyRingEquiv R σ x = x.coeff 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := (isEmptyRingEquiv R σ).symm.surjective x; simp
end isEmptyRingEquiv
/-- A helper function for `sumRingEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial [CommSemiring S₃] (f : MvPolynomial S₁ R →+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃)
(g : MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ →+* MvPolynomial S₁ R) (hfgC : (f.comp g).comp C = C)
(hfgX : ∀ n, f (g (X n)) = X n) (hgfC : (g.comp f).comp C = C) (hgfX : ∀ n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
MvPolynomial S₁ R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX
right_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX
map_mul' := f.map_mul
map_add' := f.map_add
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
def sumRingEquiv : MvPolynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) := by
apply mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial R (S₁ ⊕ S₂) _ _ (sumToIter R S₁ S₂) (iterToSum R S₁ S₂)
· refine RingHom.ext (hom_eq_hom _ _ ?hC ?hX)
case hC => ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_C, sumToIter_C]
case hX => intro; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_X, sumToIter_Xr]
· simp [iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xl]
· ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, sumToIter_C, iterToSum_C_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [sumToIter_Xl, iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xr, iterToSum_C_X]
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
@[simps!]
def sumAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
{ sumRingEquiv R S₁ S₂ with
commutes' := by
intro r
have A : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R)) r = (C (C r) :) := rfl
have B : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial (S₁ ⊕ S₂) R) r = C r := rfl
simp only [sumRingEquiv, mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial, Equiv.toFun_as_coe,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, B, sumToIter_C, A] }
lemma sumAlgEquiv_comp_rename_inr :
(sumAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂).toAlgHom.comp (rename Sum.inr) = IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R
(MvPolynomial S₂ R) (MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R)) := by
ext i
simp
lemma sumAlgEquiv_comp_rename_inl :
(sumAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂).toAlgHom.comp (rename Sum.inl) =
MvPolynomial.mapAlgHom (Algebra.ofId _ _) := by
ext i
simp
section commAlgEquiv
variable {R S₁ S₂ : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable (R S₁ S₂) in
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in variables `S₁` of multivariable
polynomials in variables `S₂` and multivariable polynomials in variables `S₂` of multivariable
polynomials in variables `S₁`. -/
noncomputable
def commAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₂ (MvPolynomial S₁ R) :=
(sumAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂).symm.trans <| (renameEquiv _ (.sumComm S₁ S₂)).trans (sumAlgEquiv R S₂ S₁)
@[simp] lemma commAlgEquiv_C (p) : commAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂ (.C p) = .map C p := by
suffices (commAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂).toAlgHom.comp
(IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (MvPolynomial S₂ R) _) = mapAlgHom (Algebra.ofId _ _) by
exact DFunLike.congr_fun this p
ext x : 1
simp [commAlgEquiv]
lemma commAlgEquiv_C_X (i) : commAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂ (.C (.X i)) = .X i := by simp
@[simp] lemma commAlgEquiv_X (i) : commAlgEquiv R S₁ S₂ (.X i) = .C (.X i) := by simp [commAlgEquiv]
end commAlgEquiv
section
-- this speeds up typeclass search in the lemma below
attribute [local instance] IsScalarTower.right
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
polynomials with coefficients in `MvPolynomial S₁ R`.
-/
@[simps! -isSimp]
def optionEquivLeft : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial S₁ R) :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim Polynomial.X fun s => Polynomial.C (X s))
(Polynomial.aevalTower (MvPolynomial.rename some) (X none))
(by ext : 2 <;> simp) (by ext i : 2; cases i <;> simp)
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X (some x)) = Polynomial.C (X x) := by
simp [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_none : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X none) = Polynomial.X := by
simp [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_C (r : R) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (C r) = Polynomial.C (C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, Polynomial.algebraMap_apply, algebraMap_eq]
theorem optionEquivLeft_monomial (m : Option S₁ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
optionEquivLeft R S₁ (monomial m r) = .monomial (m none) (monomial m.some r) := by
rw [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_monomial, prod_option_index]
· rw [MvPolynomial.monomial_eq, ← Polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp only [Polynomial.algebraMap_apply, algebraMap_eq, Option.elim_none, Option.elim_some,
map_mul, mul_assoc]
apply congr_arg₂ _ rfl
simp only [mul_comm, map_finsuppProd, map_pow]
· intros; simp
· intros; rw [pow_add]
/-- The coefficient of `n.some` in the `n none`-th coefficient of `optionEquivLeft R S₁ f`
equals the coefficient of `n` in `f` -/
theorem optionEquivLeft_coeff_coeff (n : Option S₁ →₀ ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R) :
coeff n.some (Polynomial.coeff (optionEquivLeft R S₁ f) (n none)) =
coeff n f := by
induction' f using MvPolynomial.induction_on' with j r p q hp hq generalizing n
swap
· simp only [map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add, coeff_add, hp, hq]
· rw [optionEquivLeft_monomial]
classical
simp only [Polynomial.coeff_monomial, MvPolynomial.coeff_monomial, apply_ite]
simp only [coeff_zero]
by_cases hj : j = n
· simp [hj]
· rw [if_neg hj]
simp only [ite_eq_right_iff]
intro hj_none hj_some
apply False.elim (hj _)
simp only [Finsupp.ext_iff, Option.forall, hj_none, true_and]
simpa only [Finsupp.ext_iff] using hj_some
theorem optionEquivLeft_elim_eval (s : S₁ → R) (y : R) (f : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R) :
eval (fun x ↦ Option.elim x y s) f =
Polynomial.eval y (Polynomial.map (eval s) (optionEquivLeft R S₁ f)) := by
-- turn this into a def `Polynomial.mapAlgHom`
let φ : (MvPolynomial S₁ R)[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.mapRingHom (eval s) with
commutes' := fun r => by
convert Polynomial.map_C (eval s)
exact (eval_C _).symm }
show
aeval (fun x ↦ Option.elim x y s) f =
(Polynomial.aeval y).comp (φ.comp (optionEquivLeft _ _).toAlgHom) f
congr 2
apply MvPolynomial.algHom_ext
rw [Option.forall]
simp only [aeval_X, Option.elim_none, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_comp,
Polynomial.coe_aeval_eq_eval, AlgHom.coe_mk, coe_mapRingHom, AlgHom.coe_coe, comp_apply,
optionEquivLeft_apply, Polynomial.map_X, Polynomial.eval_X, Option.elim_some, Polynomial.map_C,
eval_X, Polynomial.eval_C, implies_true, and_self, φ]
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_optionEquivLeft (p : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R) :
(optionEquivLeft R S₁ p).natDegree = p.degreeOf .none := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intro N hN
ext σ
trans p.coeff (σ.embDomain .some + .single .none N)
· simpa using optionEquivLeft_coeff_coeff R S₁ (σ.embDomain .some + .single .none N) p
simp only [coeff_zero, ← not_mem_support_iff]
intro H
simpa using (degreeOf_lt_iff ((zero_le _).trans_lt hN)).mp hN _ H
· rw [degreeOf_le_iff]
intro σ hσ
refine Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_ne_zero fun H ↦ ?_
have := optionEquivLeft_coeff_coeff R S₁ σ p
rw [H, coeff_zero, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support_iff] at this
exact this hσ
lemma totalDegree_coeff_optionEquivLeft_add_le
(p : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R) (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ p.totalDegree) :
((optionEquivLeft R S₁ p).coeff i).totalDegree + i ≤ p.totalDegree := by
classical
by_cases hpi : (optionEquivLeft R S₁ p).coeff i = 0
· rw [hpi]; simpa
rw [totalDegree, add_comm, Finset.add_sup (by simpa only [support_nonempty]), Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro σ hσ
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.le_sup (b := σ.embDomain .some + .single .none i) ?_)
· simp [Finsupp.sum_add_index, Finsupp.sum_embDomain, add_comm i]
· simpa [mem_support_iff, ← optionEquivLeft_coeff_coeff R S₁] using hσ
lemma totalDegree_coeff_optionEquivLeft_le
(p : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R) (i : ℕ) :
((optionEquivLeft R S₁ p).coeff i).totalDegree ≤ p.totalDegree := by
classical
by_cases hpi : (optionEquivLeft R S₁ p).coeff i = 0
· rw [hpi]; simp
rw [totalDegree, Finset.sup_le_iff]
intro σ hσ
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.le_sup (b := σ.embDomain .some + .single .none i) ?_)
· simp [Finsupp.sum_add_index, Finsupp.sum_embDomain, add_comm i]
· simpa [mem_support_iff, ← optionEquivLeft_coeff_coeff R S₁] using hσ
end
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
multivariable polynomials with coefficients in polynomials.
-/
@[simps!]
def optionEquivRight : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ R[X] :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim (C Polynomial.X) X)
(MvPolynomial.aevalTower (Polynomial.aeval (X none)) fun i => X (Option.some i))
(by
ext : 2 <;>
simp only [MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq, Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.id_comp,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', comp_apply, aevalTower_C, Polynomial.aeval_X, aeval_X,
Option.elim', aevalTower_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff])
(by
ext ⟨i⟩ : 2 <;>
simp only [Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval_X, aevalTower_C,
Polynomial.aeval_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, aevalTower_X])
lemma optionEquivRight_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X (some x)) = X x := by
simp [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_X_none : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X none) = C Polynomial.X := by
simp [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_C (r : R) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (C r) = C (Polynomial.C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_C, algebraMap_apply, Polynomial.algebraMap_eq]
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Fin (n + 1)` and
polynomials over multivariable polynomials in `Fin n`.
-/
def finSuccEquiv : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) :=
(renameEquiv R (_root_.finSuccEquiv n)).trans (optionEquivLeft R (Fin n))
theorem finSuccEquiv_eq :
(finSuccEquiv R n : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R →+* Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) fun i : Fin (n + 1) =>
Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i := by
ext i : 2
· simp only [finSuccEquiv, optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, AlgEquiv.coe_trans, RingHom.coe_coe,
coe_eval₂Hom, comp_apply, renameEquiv_apply, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, rename_C]
rfl
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [optionEquivLeft_apply, finSuccEquiv]
theorem finSuccEquiv_apply (p : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) :
finSuccEquiv R n p =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R))
(fun i : Fin (n + 1) => Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i) p := by
rw [← finSuccEquiv_eq, RingHom.coe_coe]
theorem finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) :
(↑(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).symm : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) →+* _).comp
(Polynomial.C.comp MvPolynomial.C) =
(MvPolynomial.C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n.succ) R) := by
refine RingHom.ext fun x => ?_
rw [RingHom.comp_apply]
refine
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).injective
(Trans.trans ((MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).apply_symm_apply _) ?_)
simp only [MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply, MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C]
variable {n} {R}
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_zero : finSuccEquiv R n (X 0) = Polynomial.X := by simp [finSuccEquiv_apply]
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_succ {j : Fin n} : finSuccEquiv R n (X j.succ) = Polynomial.C (X j) := by
simp [finSuccEquiv_apply]
| /-- The coefficient of `m` in the `i`-th coefficient of `finSuccEquiv R n f` equals the
coefficient of `Finsupp.cons i m` in `f`. -/
theorem finSuccEquiv_coeff_coeff (m : Fin n →₀ ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) (i : ℕ) :
coeff m (Polynomial.coeff (finSuccEquiv R n f) i) = coeff (m.cons i) f := by
induction f using MvPolynomial.induction_on' generalizing i m with
| add p q hp hq => simp only [map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add, coeff_add, hp, hq]
| monomial j r =>
simp only [finSuccEquiv_apply, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_monomial, RingHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.prod_pow,
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Equiv.lean | 527 | 534 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Truncated
/-!
# Leading terms of Witt vector multiplication
The goal of this file is to study the leading terms of the formula for the `n+1`st coefficient
of a product of Witt vectors `x` and `y` over a ring of characteristic `p`.
We aim to isolate the `n+1`st coefficients of `x` and `y`, and express the rest of the product
in terms of a function of the lower coefficients.
For most of this file we work with terms of type `MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ`.
We will eventually evaluate them in `k`, but first we must take care of a calculation
that needs to happen in characteristic 0.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.nth_mul_coeff`: expresses the coefficient of a product of Witt vectors
in terms of the previous coefficients of the multiplicands.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace WittVector
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
variable {k : Type*} [CommRing k]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
-- Porting note: new notation
local notation "𝕄" => MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ
open Finset MvPolynomial
/--
```
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val) *
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val)
```
-/
def wittPolyProd (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) *
rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)
theorem wittPolyProd_vars (n : ℕ) : (wittPolyProd p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [wittPolyProd]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_rename _ _) ?_
simp [wittPolynomial_vars, image_subset_iff]
/-- The "remainder term" of `WittVector.wittPolyProd`. See `mul_polyOfInterest_aux2`. -/
def wittPolyProdRemainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
∑ i ∈ range n, (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i)
theorem wittPolyProdRemainder_vars (n : ℕ) :
(wittPolyProdRemainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range n := by
rw [wittPolyProdRemainder]
refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
have : (p : 𝕄) = C (p : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast]
rw [this, vars_C]
apply empty_subset
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
apply Subset.trans (wittMul_vars _ _)
apply product_subset_product (Subset.refl _)
simp only [mem_range, range_subset] at hx ⊢
exact hx
/-- `remainder p n` represents the remainder term from `mul_polyOfInterest_aux3`.
`wittPolyProd p (n+1)` will have variables up to `n+1`,
but `remainder` will only have variables up to `n`.
-/
def remainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
(∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 0)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))) *
∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 1)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))
theorem remainder_vars (n : ℕ) : (remainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [remainder]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
rw [rename_monomial, vars_monomial, Finsupp.mapDomain_single]
· apply Subset.trans Finsupp.support_single_subset
simpa using mem_range.mp hx
· apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
/-- This is the polynomial whose degree we want to get a handle on. -/
def polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1))
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i) = wittPolyProd p n := by
simp only [wittPolyProd]
convert wittStructureInt_prop p (X (0 : Fin 2) * X 1) n using 1
· simp only [wittPolynomial, wittMul]
rw [map_sum]
congr 1 with i
congr 1
have hsupp : (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))).support = {i} := by
| rw [Finsupp.support_eq_singleton]
simp only [and_true, Finsupp.single_eq_same, eq_self_iff_true, Ne]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero
simp only [bind₁_monomial, hsupp, Int.cast_natCast, prod_singleton, eq_intCast,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, C_pow, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Int.cast_pow]
· simp only [map_mul, bind₁_X_right]
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux2 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ n * wittMul p n + wittPolyProdRemainder p n = wittPolyProd p n := by
convert mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 p n
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, pow_one]
rfl
-- We redeclare `p` here to locally discard the unneeded `p.Prime` hypothesis.
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 (p n : ℕ) : wittPolyProd p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/MulCoeff.lean | 120 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
theorem pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
⟨le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity⟩
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ multiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity ▸ pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity, not_le]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [hf.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, not_le]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_eq_coe {n : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
simp [h]
· apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [h]
norm_cast
simp
· rw [and_imp]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
simp [← emultiplicity_eq_coe, hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_ofNat {a b n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
emultiplicity a b = (ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) ↔ a ^ ofNat(n) ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (ofNat(n) + 1) ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_eq_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_eq_iff := FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left (b : α) (ha : IsUnit a) : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b :=
(·.not_unit ha)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_isUnit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left (b : α) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity 1 b := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_one_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_one_left (b : α) : emultiplicity 1 b = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left _)
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.one_right (ha : FiniteMultiplicity a 1) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 := by
simp [ha.multiplicity_eq_iff, ha.not_dvd_of_one_right]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.one_right
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left (a : α) (u : αˣ) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity (u : α) a :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left a u.isUnit
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_unit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [← ENat.coe_zero, emultiplicity_eq_coe]
simp
· simpa [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 hf] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.1 hf 1
theorem multiplicity_eq_zero :
multiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b :=
(emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one).symm.trans emultiplicity_eq_zero
theorem emultiplicity_ne_zero :
emultiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem multiplicity_ne_zero :
multiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
∃ c : α, b = a ^ multiplicity a b * c ∧ ¬a ∣ c := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
refine ⟨c, hc, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [hk, ← mul_assoc, ← _root_.pow_succ] at hc
have h₁ : a ^ (multiplicity a b + 1) ∣ b := ⟨k, hc⟩
exact (hfin.multiplicity_eq_iff.1 (by simp)).2 h₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by classical
constructor
· exact fun h n hab ↦ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_trans (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hab) h)
· intro h
unfold emultiplicity
-- aesop? says
split
next h_1 =>
obtain ⟨w, h_1⟩ := h_1
split
next h_2 =>
simp_all only [cast_le, le_find_iff, lt_find_iff, Decidable.not_not, le_refl,
not_true_eq_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
next h_2 => simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, le_top]
next h_1 =>
simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, not_true_eq_false, top_le_iff,
dite_eq_right_iff, ENat.coe_ne_top, imp_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff {c d : β} (hab : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
(hcd : FiniteMultiplicity c d) :
multiplicity a b ≤ multiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, ENat.some_eq_coe, ← hab.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
← hcd.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ↔ c ^ n ∣ d :=
⟨fun h n =>
⟨emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.le n, emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.ge n⟩,
fun h => le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mp)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mpr)⟩
theorem le_emultiplicity_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity (f a) (f b) :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n ↦ by rw [← map_pow]; exact map_dvd f
theorem emultiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : emultiplicity (f a) (f b) = emultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff, ← map_pow, map_dvd_iff]
theorem multiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : multiplicity (f a) (f b) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_map_eq f)
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right {a b c : α} (h : b ∣ c) :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a c :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun _ hb => hb.trans h
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity a c :=
le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.dvd)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.symm.dvd)
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
multiplicity a b = multiplicity a c :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right h)
theorem dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < emultiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
pow_one a ▸ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (Order.add_one_le_of_lt h)
theorem dvd_of_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < multiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos (lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity h)
theorem dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < multiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨dvd_of_multiplicity_pos, fun hdvd => Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simpa [multiplicity_eq_zero])⟩
theorem dvd_iff_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_pos_iff.trans dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
theorem Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff {a b : ℕ} : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ a ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall, not_and_or, not_ne_iff, not_lt,
Nat.le_zero]
exact
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun hb =>
have ha : a ≠ 0 := fun ha => hb <| zero_dvd_iff.mp <| by rw [ha] at h; exact h 1
Classical.by_contradiction fun ha1 : a ≠ 1 =>
have ha_gt_one : 1 < a :=
lt_of_not_ge fun _ =>
match a with
| 0 => ha rfl
| 1 => ha1 rfl
| b+2 => by omega
not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (h b)) (b.lt_pow_self ha_gt_one),
fun h => by cases h <;> simp [*]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias Nat.multiplicity_finite_iff := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff
alias ⟨_, Dvd.multiplicity_pos⟩ := dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right {a b c : α} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c)) :
FiniteMultiplicity a c := (mul_comm b c ▸ hf).mul_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_right := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right
theorem emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a)
(hb : IsUnit b) : emultiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_zero.mpr fun h ↦ ha (isUnit_of_dvd_unit h hb)
theorem multiplicity_of_isUnit_right {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a)
(hb : IsUnit b) : multiplicity a b = 0 :=
multiplicity_eq_zero.mpr fun h ↦ ha (isUnit_of_dvd_unit h hb)
theorem emultiplicity_of_one_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) : emultiplicity a 1 = 0 :=
emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha isUnit_one
theorem multiplicity_of_one_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 :=
multiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha isUnit_one
theorem emultiplicity_of_unit_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (u : αˣ) : emultiplicity a u = 0 :=
emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha u.isUnit
theorem multiplicity_of_unit_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (u : αˣ) : multiplicity a u = 0 :=
multiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha u.isUnit
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left {a b c : α} (hdvd : a ∣ b) :
emultiplicity b c ≤ emultiplicity a c :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n h => (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd hdvd n).trans h
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_left {a b c : α} (h : Associated a b) :
emultiplicity b c = emultiplicity a c :=
le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left h.dvd)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left h.symm.dvd)
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_associated_left {a b c : α} (h : Associated a b) :
multiplicity b c = multiplicity a c :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_left h)
theorem emultiplicity_mk_eq_emultiplicity {a b : α} :
emultiplicity (Associates.mk a) (Associates.mk b) = emultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk]
end CommMonoid
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.ne_zero {a b : α} (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
fun hb => by simp [hb] at hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.ne_zero := FiniteMultiplicity.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_zero (a : α) : emultiplicity a 0 = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (fun v ↦ v.ne_zero rfl)
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_zero_eq_zero_of_ne_zero (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) : emultiplicity 0 a = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_zero.2 <| mt zero_dvd_iff.1 ha
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_zero_eq_zero_of_ne_zero (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) : multiplicity 0 a = 0 :=
multiplicity_eq_zero.2 <| mt zero_dvd_iff.1 ha
end MonoidWithZero
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.or_of_add {p a b : α} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity p (a + b)) :
FiniteMultiplicity p a ∨ FiniteMultiplicity p b := by
by_contra! nh
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hf
simp_all [dvd_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.or_of_add := FiniteMultiplicity.or_of_add
theorem min_le_emultiplicity_add {p a b : α} :
min (emultiplicity p a) (emultiplicity p b) ≤ emultiplicity p (a + b) := by
cases hm : min (emultiplicity p a) (emultiplicity p b)
· simp only [top_le_iff, min_eq_top, emultiplicity_eq_top] at hm ⊢
contrapose hm
simp only [not_and_or, not_not] at hm ⊢
exact hm.or_of_add
| · apply le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd
simp [dvd_add, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity, ← hm]
end Semiring
section Ring
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 617 | 622 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, David Kurniadi Angdinata, Devon Tuma, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Ideal
/-!
# Quotients of polynomial rings
-/
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
private noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
let e := RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (fun x => by
exact eval_C : Function.RightInverse (fun a : R => (C a : R[X])) (@aeval R R _ _ _ x))
{ e with commutes' := fun r => e.apply_symm_apply r }
private noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {X - C x}) ≃ₐ[R] (R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) :=
Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R (ker_evalRingHom x).symm
-- Porting note: need to split this definition into two sub-definitions to prevent time out
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $x \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle X - x \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span ({X - C x} : Set R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 x).trans (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 x)
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_mk (x : R) (p : R[X]) :
quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ p) = p.eval x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_symm_apply (x : R) (y : R) :
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x).symm y = algebraMap R _ y :=
rfl
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $y \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle x, X - y \rangle \cong R / \langle x \rangle$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (x y : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C x, X - C y} : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R ⧸ (Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) :=
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by rw [Ideal.span_insert, sup_comm]).trans <|
(DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R _ _).symm.trans <|
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlg _ _ (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv y) rfl).trans <|
Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [Ideal.map_span, Set.image_singleton]; congr 2; exact eval_C
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at elements $y(X) \in R[X]$ and $x \in R$
induces an isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X, Y] / \langle X - x, Y - y(X) \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} :
@AlgEquiv R (R[X][X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C (X - C x), X - C y} : Ideal <| R[X][X])) R _ _ _
(Ideal.Quotient.algebra R) _ :=
((quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (X - C x) y).restrictScalars R).trans <| quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x
lemma modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_quotient_eq_zero (p q : R[X]) (hq : q.Monic) :
p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ (p : R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {q}) = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_dvd]
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
theorem quotient_map_C_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ a ∈ I, ((Quotient.mk (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) a = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact mem_map_of_mem _ ha
theorem eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ f ∈ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]), eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X f = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [← sum_monomial_eq a]
dsimp
rw [eval₂_sum]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun n _ => ?_
dsimp
rw [eval₂_monomial (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left (Polynomial.ext fun m => ?_) (X ^ n)
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, coeff_C]
by_cases h : m = 0
· simpa [h] using Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 ((mem_map_C_iff.1 ha) n)
· simp [h]
/-- If `I` is an ideal of `R`, then the ring polynomials over the quotient ring `I.quotient` is
isomorphic to the quotient of `R[X]` by the ideal `map C I`,
where `map C I` contains exactly the polynomials whose coefficients all lie in `I`. -/
def polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (I : Ideal R) :
(R ⧸ I)[X] ≃+* R[X] ⧸ (map C I : Ideal R[X]) where
toFun :=
eval₂RingHom
(Quotient.lift I ((Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) quotient_map_C_eq_zero)
(Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) X)
invFun :=
Quotient.lift (map C I : Ideal R[X]) (eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X)
eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero
map_mul' f g := by simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_mul]
map_add' f g := by simp only [eval₂_add, coe_eval₂RingHom]
left_inv := by
intro f
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, hp, hq, RingHom.map_add]
· rintro n ⟨x⟩
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul', Quotient.lift_mk, Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk,
Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul, coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C,
RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X, Function.comp_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f⟩
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was `simp_intro p q hp hq`
intros p q hp hq
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, map_add, Quotient.lift_mk,
coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq ⊢
rw [hp, hq]
· intro n a
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, ← C_mul' a (X ^ n), Quotient.lift_mk,
Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul,
coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X,
Function.comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial.symm (Quotient.mk _ f) = f.map (Quotient.mk I) := by
rw [polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial, RingEquiv.symm_mk, RingEquiv.coe_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Quotient.lift_mk, coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← Polynomial.map_map,
← eval₂_eq_eval_map, Polynomial.eval₂_C_X]
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_map_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (f.map <| Quotient.mk I) =
Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) f := by
apply (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial I).symm.injective
rw [RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply, polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `R[x]/(P)` is an integral domain. -/
theorem isDomain_map_C_quotient {P : Ideal R} (_ : IsPrime P) :
IsDomain (R[X] ⧸ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X])) :=
MulEquiv.isDomain (Polynomial (R ⧸ P)) (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial P).symm
/-- Given any ring `R` and an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, we get a map `R → R[x] → R[x]/I`.
If we let `R` be the image of `R` in `R[x]/I` then we also have a map `R[x] → R'[x]`.
In particular we can map `I` across this map, to get `I'` and a new map `R' → R'[x] → R'[x]/I`.
This theorem shows `I'` will not contain any non-zero constant polynomials. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_polynomial_mem_map_range (I : Ideal R[X]) (x : ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).range)
(hx : C x ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict)) : x = 0 := by
let i := ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict
have hi' : RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) ≤ I := by
refine fun f hf => polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal I f fun n => ?_
rw [mem_comap, ← Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← RingHom.comp_apply]
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom] at hf
replace hf := congr_arg (fun f : Polynomial _ => f.coeff n) hf
simp only [coeff_map, coeff_zero] at hf
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, RingHom.coe_rangeRestrict] at hf
obtain ⟨x, hx'⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := RingHom.mem_range.1 hx'
refine Subtype.eq ?_
simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
suffices C (i y) ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective (Polynomial.mapRingHom i)
(Polynomial.map_surjective _ (RingHom.rangeRestrict_surjective ((Quotient.mk I).comp C))) this
refine sub_add_cancel (C y) f ▸ I.add_mem (hi' ?_ : C y - f ∈ I) hf.1
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.map_sub, hf.2, sub_eq_zero, coe_mapRingHom, map_C]
exact hx
end
end Ideal
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {R : Type*} {σ : Type*} [CommRing R] {r : R}
theorem quotient_map_C_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} {i : R} (hi : i ∈ I) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) I :
Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))).comp C i = 0 := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ hi
theorem eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} {a : MvPolynomial σ R}
(ha : a ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R))) :
eval₂Hom (C.comp (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) X a = 0 := by
rw [as_sum a]
rw [coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_sum]
| refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun n _ => ?_
simp only [eval₂_monomial, Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
suffices coeff n a ∈ I by
rw [← @Ideal.mk_ker R _ I, RingHom.mem_ker] at this
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Quotient.lean | 205 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Thomas Murrills
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
/-!
## `norm_num` plugin for `^`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
namespace Mathlib
open Lean
open Meta
namespace Meta.NormNum
open Qq
variable {a b c : ℕ}
theorem natPow_zero : Nat.pow a (nat_lit 0) = nat_lit 1 := rfl
theorem natPow_one : Nat.pow a (nat_lit 1) = a := Nat.pow_one _
theorem zero_natPow : Nat.pow (nat_lit 0) (Nat.succ b) = nat_lit 0 := rfl
theorem one_natPow : Nat.pow (nat_lit 1) b = nat_lit 1 := Nat.one_pow _
/-- This is an opaque wrapper around `Nat.pow` to prevent lean from unfolding the definition of
`Nat.pow` on numerals. The arbitrary precondition `p` is actually a formula of the form
`Nat.pow a' b' = c'` but we usually don't care to unfold this proposition so we just carry a
reference to it. -/
structure IsNatPowT (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : Prop where
/-- Unfolds the assertion. -/
run' : p → Nat.pow a b = c
theorem IsNatPowT.run
(p : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a (nat_lit 1) = a) a b c) : Nat.pow a b = c := p.run' (Nat.pow_one _)
/-- This is the key to making the proof proceed as a balanced tree of applications instead of
a linear sequence. It is just modus ponens after unwrapping the definitions. -/
theorem IsNatPowT.trans {p : Prop} {b' c' : ℕ} (h1 : IsNatPowT p a b c)
(h2 : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a b' c') : IsNatPowT p a b' c' :=
⟨h2.run' ∘ h1.run'⟩
theorem IsNatPowT.bit0 : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a (nat_lit 2 * b) (Nat.mul c c) :=
⟨fun h1 => by simp [two_mul, pow_add, ← h1]⟩
theorem IsNatPowT.bit1 :
IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a (nat_lit 2 * b + nat_lit 1) (Nat.mul c (Nat.mul c a)) :=
⟨fun h1 => by simp [two_mul, pow_add, mul_assoc, ← h1]⟩
/--
Proves `Nat.pow a b = c` where `a` and `b` are raw nat literals. This could be done by just
`rfl` but the kernel does not have a special case implementation for `Nat.pow` so this would
proceed by unary recursion on `b`, which is too slow and also leads to deep recursion.
We instead do the proof by binary recursion, but this can still lead to deep recursion,
so we use an additional trick to do binary subdivision on `log2 b`. As a result this produces
a proof of depth `log (log b)` which will essentially never overflow before the numbers involved
themselves exceed memory limits.
-/
partial def evalNatPow (a b : Q(ℕ)) : (c : Q(ℕ)) × Q(Nat.pow $a $b = $c) :=
if b.natLit! = 0 then
haveI : $b =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 1), q(natPow_zero)⟩
else if a.natLit! = 0 then
haveI : $a =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
have b' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b.natLit! - 1)
haveI : $b =Q Nat.succ $b' := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 0), q(zero_natPow)⟩
else if a.natLit! = 1 then
haveI : $a =Q 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 1), q(one_natPow)⟩
else if b.natLit! = 1 then
haveI : $b =Q 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨a, q(natPow_one)⟩
else
let ⟨c, p⟩ := go b.natLit!.log2 a (mkRawNatLit 1) a b _ .rfl
⟨c, q(($p).run)⟩
where
/-- Invariants: `a ^ b₀ = c₀`, `depth > 0`, `b >>> depth = b₀`, `p := Nat.pow $a $b₀ = $c₀` -/
go (depth : Nat) (a b₀ c₀ b : Q(ℕ)) (p : Q(Prop)) (hp : $p =Q (Nat.pow $a $b₀ = $c₀)) :
(c : Q(ℕ)) × Q(IsNatPowT $p $a $b $c) :=
let b' := b.natLit!
if depth ≤ 1 then
let a' := a.natLit!
let c₀' := c₀.natLit!
if b' &&& 1 == 0 then
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c₀' * c₀')
haveI : $c =Q Nat.mul $c₀ $c₀ := ⟨⟩
haveI : $b =Q 2 * $b₀ := ⟨⟩
⟨c, q(IsNatPowT.bit0)⟩
else
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c₀' * (c₀' * a'))
haveI : $c =Q Nat.mul $c₀ (Nat.mul $c₀ $a) := ⟨⟩
haveI : $b =Q 2 * $b₀ + 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨c, q(IsNatPowT.bit1)⟩
else
let d := depth >>> 1
have hi : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b' >>> d)
let ⟨c1, p1⟩ := go (depth - d) a b₀ c₀ hi p (by exact hp)
let ⟨c2, p2⟩ := go d a hi c1 b q(Nat.pow $a $hi = $c1) ⟨⟩
⟨c2, q(($p1).trans $p2)⟩
theorem intPow_ofNat (h1 : Nat.pow a b = c) :
Int.pow (Int.ofNat a) b = Int.ofNat c := by simp [← h1]
theorem intPow_negOfNat_bit0 {b' c' : ℕ} (h1 : Nat.pow a b' = c')
(hb : nat_lit 2 * b' = b) (hc : c' * c' = c) :
Int.pow (Int.negOfNat a) b = Int.ofNat c := by
rw [← hb, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.pow_eq, pow_mul, neg_pow_two, ← pow_mul, two_mul, pow_add, ← hc,
← h1]
simp
theorem intPow_negOfNat_bit1 {b' c' : ℕ} (h1 : Nat.pow a b' = c')
(hb : nat_lit 2 * b' + nat_lit 1 = b) (hc : c' * (c' * a) = c) :
Int.pow (Int.negOfNat a) b = Int.negOfNat c := by
rw [← hb, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.pow_eq, pow_succ, pow_mul, neg_pow_two, ← pow_mul,
two_mul, pow_add, ← hc, ← h1]
simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
/-- Evaluates `Int.pow a b = c` where `a` and `b` are raw integer literals. -/
partial def evalIntPow (za : ℤ) (a : Q(ℤ)) (b : Q(ℕ)) : ℤ × (c : Q(ℤ)) × Q(Int.pow $a $b = $c) :=
have a' : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
if 0 ≤ za then
haveI : $a =Q .ofNat $a' := ⟨⟩
let ⟨c, p⟩ := evalNatPow a' b
⟨c.natLit!, q(.ofNat $c), q(intPow_ofNat $p)⟩
else
haveI : $a =Q .negOfNat $a' := ⟨⟩
let b' := b.natLit!
have b₀ : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b' >>> 1)
let ⟨c₀, p⟩ := evalNatPow a' b₀
let c' := c₀.natLit!
if b' &&& 1 == 0 then
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c' * c')
have pc : Q($c₀ * $c₀ = $c) := (q(Eq.refl $c) : Expr)
have pb : Q(2 * $b₀ = $b) := (q(Eq.refl $b) : Expr)
⟨c.natLit!, q(.ofNat $c), q(intPow_negOfNat_bit0 $p $pb $pc)⟩
else
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c' * (c' * a'.natLit!))
have pc : Q($c₀ * ($c₀ * $a') = $c) := (q(Eq.refl $c) : Expr)
have pb : Q(2 * $b₀ + 1 = $b) := (q(Eq.refl $b) : Expr)
⟨-c.natLit!, q(.negOfNat $c), q(intPow_negOfNat_bit1 $p $pb $pc)⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isNat_pow {α} [Semiring α] : ∀ {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {b a' b' c : ℕ},
f = HPow.hPow → IsNat a a' → IsNat b b' → Nat.pow a' b' = c → IsNat (f a b) c
| _, _, _, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨by simp⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isInt_pow {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {b : ℕ} {a' : ℤ} {b' : ℕ} {c : ℤ},
f = HPow.hPow → IsInt a a' → IsNat b b' → Int.pow a' b' = c → IsInt (f a b) c
| _, _, _, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨by simp⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isRat_pow {α} [Ring α] {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {an cn : ℤ} {ad b b' cd : ℕ} :
f = HPow.hPow → IsRat a an ad → IsNat b b' →
Int.pow an b' = cn → Nat.pow ad b' = cd →
IsRat (f a b) cn cd := by
rintro rfl ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨rfl⟩ (rfl : an ^ b = _) (rfl : ad ^ b = _)
have := invertiblePow (ad:α) b
rw [← Nat.cast_pow] at this
use this; simp [invOf_pow, Commute.mul_pow]
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
/-- The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `a ^ b`,
such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`, with `b : ℕ`. -/
@[norm_num _ ^ (_ : ℕ)]
def evalPow : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do
let .app (.app (f : Q($α → ℕ → $α)) (a : Q($α))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← whnfR e | failure
let ⟨nb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat b q(instAddMonoidWithOneNat)
let sα ← inferSemiring α
let ra ← derive a
guard <|← withDefault <| withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(HPow.hPow (α := $α))
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
haveI' : $f =Q HPow.hPow := ⟨⟩
let rec
/-- Main part of `evalPow`. -/
core : Option (Result e) := do
match ra with
| .isBool .. => failure
| .isNat sα na pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
have ⟨c, r⟩ := evalNatPow na nb
return .isNat sα c q(isNat_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r)
| .isNegNat rα .. =>
assumeInstancesCommute
let ⟨za, na, pa⟩ ← ra.toInt rα
have ⟨zc, c, r⟩ := evalIntPow za na nb
return .isInt rα c zc q(isInt_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r)
| .isRat dα qa na da pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
have ⟨zc, nc, r1⟩ := evalIntPow qa.num na nb
have ⟨dc, r2⟩ := evalNatPow da nb
let qc := mkRat zc dc.natLit!
return .isRat' dα qc nc dc q(isRat_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r1 $r2)
core
theorem isNat_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionSemiring α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsNat (a ^ nb) ne) :
IsNat (a ^ b) ne := by
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
theorem isNat_zpow_neg {α : Type*} [DivisionSemiring α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsInt b (Int.negOfNat nb)) (pe' : IsNat (a ^ nb)⁻¹ ne) :
IsNat (a ^ b) ne := by
rwa [pb.out, Int.cast_negOfNat, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
theorem isInt_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsInt (a ^ nb) (Int.negOfNat ne)) :
IsInt (a ^ b) (Int.negOfNat ne) := by
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
theorem isInt_zpow_neg {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsInt b (Int.negOfNat nb)) (pe' : IsInt (a ^ nb)⁻¹ (Int.negOfNat ne)) :
IsInt (a ^ b) (Int.negOfNat ne) := by
rwa [pb.out, Int.cast_negOfNat, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
theorem isRat_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb : ℕ}
{num : ℤ} {den : ℕ}
| (pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsRat (a ^ nb) num den) :
IsRat (a ^ b) num den := by
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
theorem isRat_zpow_neg {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb : ℕ}
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Pow.lean | 222 | 226 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
/-!
# Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers are a sequence of rational numbers that frequently show up in
number theory.
## Mathematical overview
The Bernoulli numbers $(B_0, B_1, B_2, \ldots)=(1, -1/2, 1/6, 0, -1/30, \ldots)$ are
a sequence of rational numbers. They show up in the formula for the sums of $k$th
powers. They are related to the Taylor series expansions of $x/\tan(x)$ and
of $\coth(x)$, and also show up in the values that the Riemann Zeta function
takes both at both negative and positive integers (and hence in the
theory of modular forms). For example, if $1 \leq n$ then
$$\zeta(2n)=\sum_{t\geq1}t^{-2n}=(-1)^{n+1}\frac{(2\pi)^{2n}B_{2n}}{2(2n)!}.$$
This result is formalised in Lean: `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`.
The Bernoulli numbers can be formally defined using the power series
$$\sum B_n\frac{t^n}{n!}=\frac{t}{1-e^{-t}}$$
although that happens to not be the definition in mathlib (this is an *implementation
detail* and need not concern the mathematician).
Note that $B_1=-1/2$, meaning that we are using the $B_n^-$ of
[from Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number).
## Implementation detail
The Bernoulli numbers are defined using well-founded induction, by the formula
$$B_n=1-\sum_{k\lt n}\frac{\binom{n}{k}}{n-k+1}B_k.$$
This formula is true for all $n$ and in particular $B_0=1$. Note that this is the definition
for positive Bernoulli numbers, which we call `bernoulli'`. The negative Bernoulli numbers are
then defined as `bernoulli := (-1)^n * bernoulli'`.
## Main theorems
`sum_bernoulli : ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli k = if n = 1 then 1 else 0`
-/
open Nat Finset Finset.Nat PowerSeries
variable (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra ℚ A]
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- The Bernoulli numbers:
the $n$-th Bernoulli number $B_n$ is defined recursively via
$$B_n = 1 - \sum_{k < n} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_k}{n+1-k}$$ -/
def bernoulli' : ℕ → ℚ :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.lt_wfRel.wf fun n bernoulli' =>
1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k k.2
theorem bernoulli'_def' (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k :=
WellFounded.fix_eq _ _ _
theorem bernoulli'_def (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k ∈ range n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k := by
rw [bernoulli'_def', ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
theorem bernoulli'_spec (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose (n - k) : ℚ) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) = 1 := by
rw [sum_range_succ_comm, bernoulli'_def n, tsub_self, choose_zero_right, sub_self, zero_add,
div_one, cast_one, one_mul, sub_add, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_sub_cancel_left,
neg_eq_zero]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x hx => by rw [choose_symm (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx)), sub_self])
theorem bernoulli'_spec' (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ antidiagonal n, ((k.1 + k.2).choose k.2 : ℚ) / (k.2 + 1) * bernoulli' k.1) = 1 := by
refine ((sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk _ n).trans ?_).trans (bernoulli'_spec n)
refine sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_of_le, mem_range_succ_iff.mp hx, cast_sub]
/-! ### Examples -/
section Examples
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_zero : bernoulli' 0 = 1 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_one : bernoulli' 1 = 1 / 2 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num
@[simp]
| theorem bernoulli'_two : bernoulli' 2 = 1 / 6 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num [sum_range_succ, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Bernoulli.lean | 104 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
| @[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 592 | 600 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The short complexes attached to homological complexes
In this file, we define a functor
`shortComplexFunctor C c i : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C`.
By definition, the image of a homological complex `K` by this functor
is the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`.
The homology `K.homology i` of a homological complex `K` in degree `i` is defined as
the homology of the short complex `(shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K`, which can be
abbreviated as `K.sc i`.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexFunctor' (i j k : ι) : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj K := ShortComplex.mk (K.d i j) (K.d j k) (K.d_comp_d i j k)
map f :=
{ τ₁ := f.f i
τ₂ := f.f j
τ₃ := f.f k }
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def shortComplexFunctor (i : ι) :=
shortComplexFunctor' C c (c.prev i) i (c.next i)
/-- The natural isomorphism `shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k`
when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def natIsoSc' (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => ShortComplex.isoMk (K.XIsoOfEq hi) (Iso.refl _) (K.XIsoOfEq hk)
(by simp) (by simp)) (by aesop_cat)
variable {C c}
variable (K L M : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M) (i j k : ι)
/-- The short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
abbrev sc' := (shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).obj K
/-- The short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
noncomputable abbrev sc := (shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoSc' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k := (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk).app K
/-- A homological complex `K` has homology in degree `i` if the associated
short complex `K.sc i` has. -/
abbrev HasHomology := (K.sc i).HasHomology
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The homology in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homology := (K.sc i).homology
/-- The cycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def cycles := (K.sc i).cycles
/-- The inclusion of the cycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : K.cycles i ⟶ K.X i := (K.sc i).iCycles
/-- The homology class map from cycles to the homology of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homologyπ : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i := (K.sc i).homologyπ
variable {i}
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def liftCycles {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
(K.sc i).liftCycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev liftCycles' {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel i j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
K.liftCycles k j (c.next_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_i {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ K.iCycles i = k := by
dsimp [liftCycles, iCycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def toCycles [K.HasHomology j] :
K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
K.liftCycles (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_d : K.iCycles i ≫ K.d i j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' hij
exact (K.sc i).iCycles_g
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, comp_zero]
/-- `K.cycles i` is the kernel of `K.d i j` when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIsKernel (hj : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.iCycles i) (K.iCycles_d i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hj
exact (K.sc i).cyclesIsKernel
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.iCycles j = K.d i j :=
liftCycles_i _ _ _ _ _
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
instance : Mono (K.iCycles i) := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi (K.homologyπ i) := by
dsimp only [homologyπ]
infer_instance
end
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_toCycles [K.HasHomology k] :
K.d i j ≫ K.toCycles j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles k), assoc, toCycles_i, d_comp_d, zero_comp]
variable {i j} in
lemma toCycles_eq_zero [K.HasHomology j] (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.toCycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles j), toCycles_i, zero_comp, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
@[reassoc]
lemma comp_liftCycles {A' A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (α : A' ⟶ A) :
α ≫ K.liftCycles k j hj hk = K.liftCycles (α ≫ k) j hj (by rw [assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), assoc, liftCycles_i]
@[reassoc]
lemma liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι)
(hj : c.next i = j) {i' : ι} (x : A ⟶ K.X i') (hx : k = x ≫ K.d i' i) :
K.liftCycles k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) ≫ K.homologyπ i = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i' i
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : liftCycles K k j hj (by rw [hx, assoc, K.d_comp_d, comp_zero]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, comp_zero] at hx
rw [← cancel_mono (K.iCycles i), zero_comp, liftCycles_i, hx]
rw [this, zero_comp]
end
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_comp_homologyπ [K.HasHomology j] :
K.toCycles i j ≫ K.homologyπ j = 0 :=
K.liftCycles_homologyπ_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) (c.next j) rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology j` is the cokernel of `K.toCycles i j : K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j`
when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.homologyπ j) (K.toCycles_comp_homologyπ i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc j).homologyIsCokernel
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The opcycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def opcycles := (K.sc i).opcycles
/-- The projection to the opcycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : K.X i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).pOpcycles
/-- The inclusion map of the homology of a homological complex into its opcycles. -/
noncomputable def homologyι : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i := (K.sc i).homologyι
variable {i}
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
(K.sc i).descOpcycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism from `K.opcycles i` that is induced by an "opcycle", i.e. a morphism
from `K.X i` whose precomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev descOpcycles' {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel j i)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.opcycles i ⟶ A :=
K.descOpcycles k j (c.prev_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) : K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj hk = k := by
dsimp [descOpcycles, pOpcycles]
simp
variable (i)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles :
K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j :=
K.descOpcycles (K.d i j) (c.prev i) rfl (K.d_comp_d _ _ _)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_pOpcycles [K.HasHomology j] : K.d i j ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' hij
exact (K.sc j).f_pOpcycles
· rw [K.shape _ _ hij, zero_comp]
/-- `K.opcycles j` is the cokernel of `K.d i j` when `c.prev j = i`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIsCokernel (hi : c.prev j = i) [K.HasHomology j] :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (K.pOpcycles j) (K.d_pOpcycles i j)) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact (K.sc j).opcyclesIsCokernel
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles :
K.pOpcycles i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = K.d i j :=
p_descOpcycles _ _ _ _ _
instance : Epi (K.pOpcycles i) := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono (K.homologyι i) := by
dsimp only [homologyι]
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_d :
K.fromOpcycles i j ≫ K.d j k = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles_assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
variable {i j} in
lemma fromOpcycles_eq_zero (hij : ¬ c.Rel i j) :
K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_fromOpcycles, comp_zero, K.shape _ _ hij]
variable {i}
@[reassoc]
lemma descOpcycles_comp {A A' : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : K.d j i ≫ k = 0) (α : A ⟶ A') :
K.descOpcycles k j hj hk ≫ α = K.descOpcycles (k ≫ α) j hj
(by rw [reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_descOpcycles_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary {A : C} (k : K.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι)
(hj : c.prev i = j) {i' : ι} (x : K.X i' ⟶ A) (hx : k = K.d i i' ≫ x) :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
by_cases h : c.Rel i i'
· obtain rfl := c.next_eq' h
exact (K.sc i).homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary _ x hx
· have : K.descOpcycles k j hj (by rw [hx, K.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [K.shape _ _ h, zero_comp] at hx
rw [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), comp_zero, p_descOpcycles, hx]
rw [this, comp_zero]
variable (i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles :
K.homologyι i ≫ K.fromOpcycles i j = 0 :=
K.homologyι_descOpcycles_eq_zero_of_boundary (K.d i j) _ rfl (𝟙 _) (by simp)
/-- `K.homology i` is the kernel of `K.fromOpcycles i j : K.opcycles i ⟶ K.X j`
when `c.next i = j`. -/
noncomputable def homologyIsKernel (hi : c.next i = j) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (K.homologyι i) (K.homologyι_comp_fromOpcycles i j)) := by
subst hi
exact (K.sc i).homologyIsKernel
variable {K L M}
variable [L.HasHomology i] [M.HasHomology i]
/-- The map `K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def homologyMap : K.homology i ⟶ L.homology i :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : K.cycles i ⟶ L.cycles i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
/-- The map `K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i` induced by a morphism in `HomologicalComplex`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : K.opcycles i ⟶ L.opcycles i :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).map φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.iCycles i = K.iCycles i ≫ φ.f i :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_i _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : K.pOpcycles i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i = φ.f i ≫ L.pOpcycles i :=
ShortComplex.p_opcyclesMap _
instance [Mono (φ.f i)] : Mono (cyclesMap φ i) := mono_of_mono_fac (cyclesMap_i φ i)
instance [Epi (φ.f i)] : Epi (opcyclesMap φ i) := epi_of_epi_fac (p_opcyclesMap φ i)
variable (K)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_id : homologyMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id : cyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id : opcyclesMap (𝟙 K) i = 𝟙 _ :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_id _
variable {K}
@[reassoc]
lemma homologyMap_comp : homologyMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = homologyMap φ i ≫ homologyMap ψ i := by
dsimp [homologyMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.homologyMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp : cyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ cyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [cyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.cyclesMap_comp]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp : opcyclesMap (φ ≫ ψ) i = opcyclesMap φ i ≫ opcyclesMap ψ i := by
dsimp [opcyclesMap]
rw [Functor.map_comp, ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_comp]
variable (K L)
@[simp]
lemma homologyMap_zero : homologyMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.homologyMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero : cyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.cyclesMap_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero : opcyclesMap (0 : K ⟶ L) i = 0 :=
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap_zero _ _
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyπ_naturality :
K.homologyπ i ≫ homologyMap φ i = cyclesMap φ i ≫ L.homologyπ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyπ_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homologyι_naturality :
homologyMap φ i ≫ L.homologyι i = K.homologyι i ≫ opcyclesMap φ i :=
ShortComplex.homologyι_naturality _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma homology_π_ι :
K.homologyπ i ≫ K.homologyι i = K.iCycles i ≫ K.pOpcycles i :=
(K.sc i).homology_π_ι
variable {i}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp_descOpcycles {A : C} (k : L.X i ⟶ A) (j : ι) (hj : c.prev i = j)
(hk : L.d j i ≫ k = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
opcyclesMap φ i ≫ L.descOpcycles k j hj hk = K.descOpcycles (φ.f i ≫ k) j hj
(by rw [← φ.comm_assoc, hk, comp_zero]) := by
simp only [← cancel_epi (K.pOpcycles i), p_opcyclesMap_assoc, p_descOpcycles]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_comp_cyclesMap {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) (φ : K ⟶ L) :
K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ cyclesMap φ i = L.liftCycles (k ≫ φ.f i) j hj
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm, reassoc_of% hk, zero_comp]) := by
simp only [← cancel_mono (L.iCycles i), assoc, cyclesMap_i, liftCycles_i_assoc, liftCycles_i]
section
variable (C c i)
attribute [local simp] homologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- The `i`th homology functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def homologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.homology i
map f := homologyMap f i
/-- The homology functor to graded objects. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def gradedHomologyFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ GradedObject ι C where
obj K i := K.homology i
map f i := homologyMap f i
/-- The `i`th cycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.cycles i
map f := cyclesMap f i
/-- The `i`th opcycles functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesFunctor [CategoryWithHomology C] : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ C where
obj K := K.opcycles i
map f := opcyclesMap f i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyπ i : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyπ [CategoryWithHomology C] :
cyclesFunctor C c i ⟶ homologyFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyπ i
/-- The natural transformation `K.homologyι i : K.homology i ⟶ K.opcycles i`
for all `K : HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def natTransHomologyι [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C c i where
app K := K.homologyι i
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ (K.sc i).homology`
for all homological complexes `K`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso [CategoryWithHomology C] :
homologyFunctor C c i ≅
shortComplexFunctor C c i ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
Iso.refl _
/-- The natural isomorphism `K.homology j ≅ (K.sc' i j k).homology`
for all homological complexes `K` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorIso' [CategoryWithHomology C]
(hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
homologyFunctor C c j ≅
shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k ⋙ ShortComplex.homologyFunctor C :=
homologyFunctorIso C c j ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk) _
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (homologyFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (opcyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance [CategoryWithHomology C] : (cyclesFunctor C c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
end
end
section
variable (hj : c.next i = j) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology i]
include hj h
lemma isIso_iCycles : IsIso (K.iCycles i) := by
subst hj
exact ShortComplex.isIso_iCycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles i ≅ K.X i` when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def iCyclesIso : K.cycles i ≅ K.X i :=
have := K.isIso_iCycles i j hj h
asIso (K.iCycles i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.iCycles i ≫ (K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv ≫ K.iCycles i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.iCyclesIso i j hj h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyι : IsIso (K.homologyι i) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyι _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i`
when the differential from `i` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyι : K.homology i ≅ K.opcycles i :=
have := K.isIso_homologyι i j hj h
asIso (K.homologyι i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyι i ≫ (K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv ≫ K.homologyι i = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyι i j hj h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (hi : c.prev j = i) (h : K.d i j = 0) [K.HasHomology j]
include hi h
lemma isIso_pOpcycles : IsIso (K.pOpcycles j) := by
obtain rfl := hi
exact ShortComplex.isIso_pOpcycles _ h
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.X j ≅ K.opCycles j` when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def pOpcyclesIso : K.X j ≅ K.opcycles j :=
have := K.isIso_pOpcycles i j hi h
asIso (K.pOpcycles j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_hom_inv_id :
K.pOpcycles j ≫ (K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcyclesIso_inv_hom_id :
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv ≫ K.pOpcycles j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.pOpcyclesIso i j hi h).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_homologyπ : IsIso (K.homologyπ j) :=
ShortComplex.isIso_homologyπ _ (by aesop_cat)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j`
when the differential to `j` is zero. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def isoHomologyπ : K.cycles j ≅ K.homology j :=
have := K.isIso_homologyπ i j hi h
asIso (K.homologyπ j)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_hom_inv_id :
K.homologyπ j ≫ (K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyπ_inv_hom_id :
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv ≫ K.homologyπ j = 𝟙 _ :=
(K.isoHomologyπ i j hi h).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable {K L}
lemma epi_homologyMap_of_epi_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (i : ι)
[K.HasHomology i] [L.HasHomology i] [Epi (φ.f i)] (hi : ∀ j, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Epi (homologyMap φ i) :=
((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyι i _ rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).2
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms.infer_property (opcyclesMap φ i))
lemma mono_homologyMap_of_mono_of_not_rel (φ : K ⟶ L) (j : ι)
[K.HasHomology j] [L.HasHomology j] [Mono (φ.f j)] (hj : ∀ i, ¬ c.Rel i j) :
Mono (homologyMap φ j) :=
((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (K.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto)))
(L.isoHomologyπ _ j rfl (shape _ _ _ (by tauto))))).1
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms.infer_property (cyclesMap φ j))
end
/-- A homological complex `K` is exact at `i` if the short complex `K.sc i` is exact. -/
def ExactAt := (K.sc i).Exact
lemma exactAt_iff :
K.ExactAt i ↔ (K.sc i).Exact := by rfl
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.of_iso (hK : K.ExactAt i) {L : HomologicalComplex C c} (e : K ≅ L) :
L.ExactAt i := by
rw [exactAt_iff] at hK ⊢
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_iso ((shortComplexFunctor C c i).mapIso e) hK
lemma exactAt_iff' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.ExactAt j ↔ (K.sc' i j k).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_iso (K.isoSc' i j k hi hk)
lemma exactAt_iff_isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] :
K.ExactAt i ↔ IsZero (K.homology i) := by
dsimp [homology]
rw [exactAt_iff, ShortComplex.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
variable {K i} in
lemma ExactAt.isZero_homology [K.HasHomology i] (h : K.ExactAt i) :
IsZero (K.homology i) := by
rwa [← exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
/-- A homological complex `K` is acyclic if it is exact at `i` for any `i`. -/
def Acyclic := ∀ i, K.ExactAt i
lemma acyclic_iff :
K.Acyclic ↔ ∀ i, K.ExactAt i := by rfl
lemma acyclic_of_isZero (hK : IsZero K) :
K.Acyclic := by
rw [acyclic_iff]
intro i
apply ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂
exact (eval _ _ i).map_isZero hK
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(K L : ChainComplex C ℕ) (φ : K ⟶ L) [K.HasHomology 0]
instance isIso_homologyι₀ :
IsIso (K.homologyι 0) :=
K.isIso_homologyι 0 _ rfl (by simp)
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.homology 0 ≅ K.opcycles 0` for a chain complex `K`
indexed by `ℕ`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoHomologyι₀ :
K.homology 0 ≅ K.opcycles 0 := K.isoHomologyι 0 _ rfl (by simp)
variable {K L}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoHomologyι₀_inv_naturality [L.HasHomology 0] :
K.isoHomologyι₀.inv ≫ HomologicalComplex.homologyMap φ 0 =
HomologicalComplex.opcyclesMap φ 0 ≫ L.isoHomologyι₀.inv := by
simp only [assoc, ← cancel_mono (L.homologyι 0),
HomologicalComplex.homologyι_naturality, HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id_assoc,
HomologicalComplex.isoHomologyι_inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(K L : CochainComplex C ℕ) (φ : K ⟶ L) [K.HasHomology 0]
|
instance isIso_homologyπ₀ :
IsIso (K.homologyπ 0) :=
K.isIso_homologyπ _ 0 rfl (by simp)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/HomologicalComplex.lean | 669 | 673 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Paul Reichert. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul Reichert
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Colimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.IsConnected
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Final
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.HomCongr
/-!
# Colimits of connected index categories
This file proves two characterizations of connected categories by means of colimits.
## Characterization of connected categories by means of the unit-valued functor
First, it is proved that a category `C` is connected if and only if `colim F` is a singleton,
where `F : C ⥤ Type w` and `F.obj _ = PUnit` (for arbitrary `w`).
See `isConnected_iff_colimit_constPUnitFunctor_iso_pUnit` for the proof of this characterization and
`constPUnitFunctor` for the definition of the constant functor used in the statement. A formulation
based on `IsColimit` instead of `colimit` is given in `isConnected_iff_isColimit_pUnitCocone`.
The `if` direction is also available directly in several formulations:
For connected index categories `C`, `PUnit.{w}` is a colimit of the `constPUnitFunctor`, where `w`
is arbitrary. See `instHasColimitConstPUnitFunctor`, `isColimitPUnitCocone` and
`colimitConstPUnitIsoPUnit`.
## Final functors preserve connectedness of categories (in both directions)
`isConnected_iff_of_final` proves that the domain of a final functor is connected if and only if
its codomain is connected.
## Tags
unit-valued, singleton, colimit
-/
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits.Types
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The functor mapping every object to `PUnit`. -/
def constPUnitFunctor : C ⥤ Type w := (Functor.const C).obj PUnit.{w + 1}
/-- The cocone on `constPUnitFunctor` with cone point `PUnit`. -/
@[simps]
def pUnitCocone : Cocone (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C) where
pt := PUnit
ι := { app := fun _ => id }
/-- If `C` is connected, the cocone on `constPUnitFunctor` with cone point `PUnit` is a colimit
cocone. -/
noncomputable def isColimitPUnitCocone [IsConnected C] : IsColimit (pUnitCocone.{w} C) where
desc s := s.ι.app Classical.ofNonempty
fac s j := by
ext ⟨⟩
apply constant_of_preserves_morphisms (s.ι.app · PUnit.unit)
intros X Y f
exact congrFun (s.ι.naturality f).symm PUnit.unit
uniq s m h := by
ext ⟨⟩
simp [← h Classical.ofNonempty]
instance instHasColimitConstPUnitFunctor [IsConnected C] : HasColimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C) :=
⟨_, isColimitPUnitCocone _⟩
instance instSubsingletonColimitPUnit
[IsPreconnected C] [HasColimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C)] :
Subsingleton (colimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C)) where
allEq a b := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨⟩, rfl⟩ := jointly_surjective' a
obtain ⟨d, ⟨⟩, rfl⟩ := jointly_surjective' b
apply constant_of_preserves_morphisms (colimit.ι (constPUnitFunctor C) · PUnit.unit)
exact fun c d f => colimit_sound f rfl
/-- Given a connected index category, the colimit of the constant unit-valued functor is `PUnit`. -/
noncomputable def colimitConstPUnitIsoPUnit [IsConnected C] :
colimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C) ≅ PUnit.{w + 1} :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) (isColimitPUnitCocone.{w} C)
/-- Let `F` be a `Type`-valued functor. If two elements `a : F c` and `b : F d` represent the same
element of `colimit F`, then `c` and `d` are related by a `Zigzag`. -/
theorem zigzag_of_eqvGen_quot_rel (F : C ⥤ Type w) (c d : Σ j, F.obj j)
(h : Relation.EqvGen (Quot.Rel F) c d) : Zigzag c.1 d.1 := by
induction h with
| rel _ _ h => exact Zigzag.of_hom <| Exists.choose h
| refl _ => exact Zigzag.refl _
| symm _ _ _ ih => exact zigzag_symmetric ih
| trans _ _ _ _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => exact ih₁.trans ih₂
/-- An index category is connected iff the colimit of the constant singleton-valued functor is a
singleton. -/
theorem isConnected_iff_colimit_constPUnitFunctor_iso_pUnit
[HasColimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C)] :
IsConnected C ↔ Nonempty (colimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C) ≅ PUnit) := by
refine ⟨fun _ => ⟨colimitConstPUnitIsoPUnit.{w} C⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ => ?_⟩
have : Nonempty C := nonempty_of_nonempty_colimit <| Nonempty.map h.inv inferInstance
refine zigzag_isConnected <| fun c d => ?_
refine zigzag_of_eqvGen_quot_rel _ (constPUnitFunctor C) ⟨c, PUnit.unit⟩ ⟨d, PUnit.unit⟩ ?_
| exact colimit_eq <| h.toEquiv.injective rfl
theorem isConnected_iff_isColimit_pUnitCocone :
IsConnected C ↔ Nonempty (IsColimit (pUnitCocone.{w} C)) := by
refine ⟨fun inst => ⟨isColimitPUnitCocone C⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ => ?_⟩
let colimitCocone : ColimitCocone (constPUnitFunctor C) := ⟨pUnitCocone.{w} C, h⟩
have : HasColimit (constPUnitFunctor.{w} C) := ⟨⟨colimitCocone⟩⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/IsConnected.lean | 106 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.MeasureComp
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.CondDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
/-!
# Kernel associated with a conditional expectation
We define `condExpKernel μ m`, a kernel from `Ω` to `Ω` such that for all integrable functions `f`,
`μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
This kernel is defined if `Ω` is a standard Borel space. In general, `μ⟦s | m⟧` maps a measurable
set `s` to a function `Ω → ℝ≥0∞`, and for all `s` that map is unique up to a `μ`-null set. For all
`a`, the map from sets to `ℝ≥0∞` that we obtain that way verifies some of the properties of a
measure, but the fact that the `μ`-null set depends on `s` can prevent us from finding versions of
the conditional expectation that combine into a true measure. The standard Borel space assumption
on `Ω` allows us to do so.
## Main definitions
* `condExpKernel μ m`: kernel such that `μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
## Main statements
* `condExp_ae_eq_integral_condExpKernel`: `μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section AuxLemmas
variable {Ω F : Type*} {m mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Ω → F}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_snd_map_prod_id [TopologicalSpace F]
(hm : m ≤ mΩ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable[m.prod mΩ] (fun x : Ω × Ω => f x.2)
(@Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω => (id ω, id ω)) μ) := by
rw [← aestronglyMeasurable_comp_snd_map_prodMk_iff (measurable_id'' hm)] at hf
simp_rw [id] at hf ⊢
exact hf
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_snd_map_prod_id [NormedAddCommGroup F] (hm : m ≤ mΩ)
(hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun x : Ω × Ω => f x.2)
(@Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω => (id ω, id ω)) μ) := by
rw [← integrable_comp_snd_map_prodMk_iff (measurable_id'' hm)] at hf
simp_rw [id] at hf ⊢
exact hf
end AuxLemmas
variable {Ω F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} [mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω]
[StandardBorelSpace Ω] {μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
open Classical in
/-- Kernel associated with the conditional expectation with respect to a σ-algebra. It satisfies
`μ[f | m] =ᵐ[μ] fun ω => ∫ y, f y ∂(condExpKernel μ m ω)`.
It is defined as the conditional distribution of the identity given the identity, where the second
identity is understood as a map from `Ω` with the σ-algebra `mΩ` to `Ω` with σ-algebra `m ⊓ mΩ`.
We use `m ⊓ mΩ` instead of `m` to ensure that it is a sub-σ-algebra of `mΩ`. We then use
`Kernel.comap` to get a kernel from `m` to `mΩ` instead of from `m ⊓ mΩ` to `mΩ`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def condExpKernel (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(m : MeasurableSpace Ω) : @Kernel Ω Ω m mΩ :=
if _h : Nonempty Ω then
Kernel.comap (@condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _) id
(measurable_id'' (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m))
else 0
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpKernel := condExpKernel
lemma condExpKernel_eq (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : Nonempty Ω]
(m : MeasurableSpace Ω) :
condExpKernel (mΩ := mΩ) μ m = Kernel.comap (@condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _) id
(measurable_id'' (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m)) := by
simp [condExpKernel, h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexpKernel_eq := condExpKernel_eq
lemma condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib [Nonempty Ω] {ω : Ω} :
condExpKernel μ m ω = @condDistrib Ω Ω Ω mΩ _ _ mΩ (m ⊓ mΩ) id id μ _ (id ω) := by
simp [condExpKernel_eq, Kernel.comap_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib := condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib
instance : IsMarkovKernel (condExpKernel μ m) := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty Ω with h | h
· exact ⟨fun a ↦ (IsEmpty.false a).elim⟩
· simp [condExpKernel, h]; infer_instance
lemma compProd_trim_condExpKernel (hm : m ≤ mΩ) :
(μ.trim hm) ⊗ₘ condExpKernel μ m
= @Measure.map Ω (Ω × Ω) mΩ (m.prod mΩ) (fun ω ↦ (id ω, id ω)) μ := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty Ω with h | h
· simp [Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty μ]
rw [condExpKernel_eq]
have : m ⊓ mΩ = m := inf_of_le_left hm
have h := compProd_map_condDistrib (mβ := m) (μ := μ) (X := id) measurable_id.aemeasurable
rw [← h, trim_eq_map hm]
congr 1
ext a s hs
simp only [Kernel.coe_comap, Function.comp_apply, id_eq]
congr
lemma condExpKernel_comp_trim (hm : m ≤ mΩ) : condExpKernel μ m ∘ₘ μ.trim hm = μ := by
rw [← Measure.snd_compProd, compProd_trim_condExpKernel, @Measure.snd_map_prodMk, Measure.map_id]
exact measurable_id'' hm
section Measurability
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : Ω → F}
theorem measurable_condExpKernel {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[m] fun ω => condExpKernel μ m ω s := by
nontriviality Ω
simp_rw [condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib]
refine Measurable.mono ?_ (inf_le_left : m ⊓ mΩ ≤ m) le_rfl
convert measurable_condDistrib (μ := μ) hs
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_id]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias measurable_condexpKernel := measurable_condExpKernel
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel {s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] fun ω => condExpKernel μ m ω s :=
Measurable.stronglyMeasurable (measurable_condExpKernel hs)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_condexpKernel := stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel' [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
| StronglyMeasurable[m ⊓ mΩ] (fun ω ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂condExpKernel μ m ω) := by
nontriviality Ω
simp_rw [condExpKernel_apply_eq_condDistrib]
exact (hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd).integral_condDistrib
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_condExpKernel [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Condexp.lean | 141 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ExactSequence
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Refinements
/-!
# The snake lemma
The snake lemma is a standard tool in homological algebra. The basic situation
is when we have a diagram as follows in an abelian category `C`, with exact rows:
L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂ ⟶ L₁.X₃ ⟶ 0
| | |
|v₁₂.τ₁ |v₁₂.τ₂ |v₁₂.τ₃
v v v
0 ⟶ L₂.X₁ ⟶ L₂.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₃
We shall think of this diagram as the datum of a morphism `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂` in the
category `ShortComplex C` such that both `L₁` and `L₂` are exact, and `L₁.g` is epi
and `L₂.f` is a mono (which is equivalent to saying that `L₁.X₃` is the cokernel
of `L₁.f` and `L₂.X₁` is the kernel of `L₂.g`). Then, we may introduce the kernels
and cokernels of the vertical maps. In other words, we may introduce short complexes
`L₀` and `L₃` that are respectively the kernel and the cokernel of `v₁₂`. All these
data constitute a `SnakeInput C`.
Given such a `S : SnakeInput C`, we define a connecting homomorphism
`S.δ : L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁` and show that it is part of an exact sequence
`L₀.X₁ ⟶ L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂ ⟶ L₃.X₃`. Each of the four exactness
statement is first stated separately as lemmas `L₀_exact`, `L₁'_exact`,
`L₂'_exact` and `L₃_exact` and the full 6-term exact sequence is stated
as `snake_lemma`. This sequence can even be extended with an extra `0`
on the left (see `mono_L₀_f`) if `L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₁.X₂` is a mono (i.e. `L₁` is short exact),
and similarly an extra `0` can be added on the right (`epi_L₃_g`)
if `L₂.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₃` is an epi (i.e. `L₂` is short exact).
These results were also obtained in the Liquid Tensor Experiment. The code and the proof
here are slightly easier because of the use of the category `ShortComplex C`,
the use of duality (which allows to construct only half of the sequence, and deducing
the other half by arguing in the opposite category), and the use of "refinements"
(see `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Refinements`) instead of a weak form of pseudo-elements.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Abelian C]
namespace ShortComplex
/-- A snake input in an abelian category `C` consists of morphisms
of short complexes `L₀ ⟶ L₁ ⟶ L₂ ⟶ L₃` (which should be visualized vertically) such
that `L₀` and `L₃` are respectively the kernel and the cokernel of `L₁ ⟶ L₂`,
`L₁` and `L₂` are exact, `L₁.g` is epi and `L₂.f` is mono. -/
structure SnakeInput where
/-- the zeroth row -/
L₀ : ShortComplex C
/-- the first row -/
L₁ : ShortComplex C
/-- the second row -/
L₂ : ShortComplex C
/-- the third row -/
L₃ : ShortComplex C
/-- the morphism from the zeroth row to the first row -/
v₀₁ : L₀ ⟶ L₁
/-- the morphism from the first row to the second row -/
v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂
/-- the morphism from the second row to the third row -/
v₂₃ : L₂ ⟶ L₃
w₀₂ : v₀₁ ≫ v₁₂ = 0 := by aesop_cat
w₁₃ : v₁₂ ≫ v₂₃ = 0 := by aesop_cat
/-- `L₀` is the kernel of `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂`. -/
h₀ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι _ w₀₂)
/-- `L₃` is the cokernel of `v₁₂ : L₁ ⟶ L₂`. -/
h₃ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ _ w₁₃)
L₁_exact : L₁.Exact
epi_L₁_g : Epi L₁.g
L₂_exact : L₂.Exact
mono_L₂_f : Mono L₂.f
initialize_simps_projections SnakeInput (-h₀, -h₃)
namespace SnakeInput
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] w₀₂ w₁₃
attribute [instance] epi_L₁_g
attribute [instance] mono_L₂_f
variable {C}
variable (S : SnakeInput C)
/-- The snake input in the opposite category that is deduced from a snake input. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def op : SnakeInput Cᵒᵖ where
L₀ := S.L₃.op
L₁ := S.L₂.op
L₂ := S.L₁.op
L₃ := S.L₀.op
epi_L₁_g := by dsimp; infer_instance
mono_L₂_f := by dsimp; infer_instance
v₀₁ := opMap S.v₂₃
v₁₂ := opMap S.v₁₂
v₂₃ := opMap S.v₀₁
w₀₂ := congr_arg opMap S.w₁₃
w₁₃ := congr_arg opMap S.w₀₂
h₀ := isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' (ShortComplex.opEquiv C).functor _
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ S.h₃)
h₃ := isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit' (ShortComplex.opEquiv C).functor _
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ S.h₀)
L₁_exact := S.L₂_exact.op
L₂_exact := S.L₁_exact.op
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₁ : S.v₀₁.τ₁ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₁ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₂ : S.v₀₁.τ₂ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₂]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₀₂_τ₃ : S.v₀₁.τ₃ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₃ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₃]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₁ : S.v₁₂.τ₁ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₂ : S.v₁₂.τ₂ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₂ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₂]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma w₁₃_τ₃ : S.v₁₂.τ₃ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₃ = 0 := by
rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₃]
/-- `L₀.X₁` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₁ : L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₂.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₁ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₁ S.w₀₂_τ₁) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₁ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
/-- `L₀.X₂` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₂ : L₁.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₂ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₂ S.w₀₂_τ₂) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₂ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
/-- `L₀.X₃` is the kernel of `v₁₂.τ₃ : L₁.X₃ ⟶ L₂.X₃`. -/
noncomputable def h₀τ₃ : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.v₀₁.τ₃ S.w₀₂_τ₃) :=
isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit' π₃ S.w₀₂ S.h₀
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₁ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₁ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₁
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₂ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₂ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₂
instance mono_v₀₁_τ₃ : Mono S.v₀₁.τ₃ := mono_of_isLimit_fork S.h₀τ₃
/-- The upper part of the first column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₁_up : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₀₁.τ₁ S.v₁₂.τ₁
(by rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₁])).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ S.h₀τ₁
/-- The upper part of the second column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₂_up : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₀₁.τ₂ S.v₁₂.τ₂
(by rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₂])).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ S.h₀τ₂
/-- The upper part of the third column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₃_up : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₀₁.τ₃ S.v₁₂.τ₃
(by rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₀₂, zero_τ₃])).Exact :=
exact_of_f_is_kernel _ S.h₀τ₃
instance mono_L₀_f [Mono S.L₁.f] : Mono S.L₀.f := by
have : Mono (S.L₀.f ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₂) := by
rw [← S.v₀₁.comm₁₂]
apply mono_comp
exact mono_of_mono _ S.v₀₁.τ₂
/-- `L₃.X₁` is the cokernel of `v₁₂.τ₁ : L₁.X₁ ⟶ L₂.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def h₃τ₁ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.v₂₃.τ₁ S.w₁₃_τ₁) :=
isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit' π₁ S.w₁₃ S.h₃
/-- `L₃.X₂` is the cokernel of `v₁₂.τ₂ : L₁.X₂ ⟶ L₂.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def h₃τ₂ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.v₂₃.τ₂ S.w₁₃_τ₂) :=
isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit' π₂ S.w₁₃ S.h₃
/-- `L₃.X₃` is the cokernel of `v₁₂.τ₃ : L₁.X₃ ⟶ L₂.X₃`. -/
noncomputable def h₃τ₃ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.v₂₃.τ₃ S.w₁₃_τ₃) :=
isColimitCoforkMapOfIsColimit' π₃ S.w₁₃ S.h₃
instance epi_v₂₃_τ₁ : Epi S.v₂₃.τ₁ := epi_of_isColimit_cofork S.h₃τ₁
instance epi_v₂₃_τ₂ : Epi S.v₂₃.τ₂ := epi_of_isColimit_cofork S.h₃τ₂
instance epi_v₂₃_τ₃ : Epi S.v₂₃.τ₃ := epi_of_isColimit_cofork S.h₃τ₃
/-- The lower part of the first column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₁_down : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₁₂.τ₁ S.v₂₃.τ₁
(by rw [← comp_τ₁, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₁])).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ S.h₃τ₁
/-- The lower part of the second column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₂_down : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₁₂.τ₂ S.v₂₃.τ₂
(by rw [← comp_τ₂, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₂])).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ S.h₃τ₂
/-- The lower part of the third column of the snake diagram is exact. -/
lemma exact_C₃_down : (ShortComplex.mk S.v₁₂.τ₃ S.v₂₃.τ₃
(by rw [← comp_τ₃, S.w₁₃, zero_τ₃])).Exact :=
exact_of_g_is_cokernel _ S.h₃τ₃
instance epi_L₃_g [Epi S.L₂.g] : Epi S.L₃.g := by
have : Epi (S.v₂₃.τ₂ ≫ S.L₃.g) := by
rw [S.v₂₃.comm₂₃]
apply epi_comp
exact epi_of_epi S.v₂₃.τ₂ _
lemma L₀_exact : S.L₀.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_exact_up_to_refinements]
intro A x₂ hx₂
obtain ⟨A₁, π₁, hπ₁, y₁, hy₁⟩ := S.L₁_exact.exact_up_to_refinements (x₂ ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₂)
(by rw [assoc, S.v₀₁.comm₂₃, reassoc_of% hx₂, zero_comp])
have hy₁' : y₁ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₁ = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono S.L₂.f, assoc, zero_comp, S.v₁₂.comm₁₂,
← reassoc_of% hy₁, w₀₂_τ₂, comp_zero]
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁⟩ : ∃ x₁, x₁ ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₁ = y₁ := ⟨_, S.exact_C₁_up.lift_f y₁ hy₁'⟩
refine ⟨A₁, π₁, hπ₁, x₁, ?_⟩
simp only [← cancel_mono S.v₀₁.τ₂, assoc, ← S.v₀₁.comm₁₂, reassoc_of% hx₁, hy₁]
lemma L₃_exact : S.L₃.Exact := S.op.L₀_exact.unop
/-- The fiber product of `L₁.X₂` and `L₀.X₃` over `L₁.X₃`. This is an auxiliary
object in the construction of the morphism `δ : L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def P := pullback S.L₁.g S.v₀₁.τ₃
/-- The canonical map `P ⟶ L₂.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def φ₂ : S.P ⟶ S.L₂.X₂ := pullback.fst _ _ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_φ₂ {A : C} (a : A ⟶ S.L₁.X₂) (b : A ⟶ S.L₀.X₃) (h : a ≫ S.L₁.g = b ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₃) :
pullback.lift a b h ≫ S.φ₂ = a ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂ := by
simp [φ₂]
/-- The canonical map `P ⟶ L₂.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def φ₁ : S.P ⟶ S.L₂.X₁ :=
S.L₂_exact.lift S.φ₂
(by simp only [φ₂, assoc, S.v₁₂.comm₂₃, pullback.condition_assoc, w₀₂_τ₃, comp_zero])
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma φ₁_L₂_f : S.φ₁ ≫ S.L₂.f = S.φ₂ := S.L₂_exact.lift_f _ _
/-- The short complex that is part of an exact sequence `L₁.X₁ ⟶ P ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ 0`. -/
noncomputable def L₀' : ShortComplex C where
X₁ := S.L₁.X₁
X₂ := S.P
X₃ := S.L₀.X₃
f := pullback.lift S.L₁.f 0 (by simp)
g := pullback.snd _ _
zero := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma L₁_f_φ₁ : S.L₀'.f ≫ S.φ₁ = S.v₁₂.τ₁ := by
dsimp only [L₀']
simp only [← cancel_mono S.L₂.f, assoc, φ₁_L₂_f, φ₂, pullback.lift_fst_assoc,
S.v₁₂.comm₁₂]
instance : Epi S.L₀'.g := by dsimp only [L₀']; infer_instance
instance [Mono S.L₁.f] : Mono S.L₀'.f :=
mono_of_mono_fac (show S.L₀'.f ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = S.L₁.f by simp [L₀'])
lemma L₀'_exact : S.L₀'.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_exact_up_to_refinements]
intro A x₂ hx₂
dsimp [L₀'] at x₂ hx₂
obtain ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, fac⟩ := S.L₁_exact.exact_up_to_refinements (x₂ ≫ pullback.fst _ _)
(by rw [assoc, pullback.condition, reassoc_of% hx₂, zero_comp])
exact ⟨A', π, hπ, x₁, pullback.hom_ext (by simpa [L₀'] using fac) (by simp [L₀', hx₂])⟩
/-- The connecting homomorphism `δ : L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def δ : S.L₀.X₃ ⟶ S.L₃.X₁ :=
S.L₀'_exact.desc (S.φ₁ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁) (by simp only [L₁_f_φ₁_assoc, w₁₃_τ₁])
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma snd_δ : (pullback.snd _ _ : S.P ⟶ _) ≫ S.δ = S.φ₁ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁ :=
S.L₀'_exact.g_desc _ _
/-- The pushout of `L₂.X₂` and `L₃.X₁` along `L₂.X₁`. -/
noncomputable def P' := pushout S.L₂.f S.v₂₃.τ₁
lemma snd_δ_inr : (pullback.snd _ _ : S.P ⟶ _) ≫ S.δ ≫ (pushout.inr _ _ : _ ⟶ S.P') =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂ ≫ pushout.inl _ _ := by
simp only [snd_δ_assoc, ← pushout.condition, φ₂, φ₁_L₂_f_assoc, assoc]
/-- The canonical morphism `L₀.X₂ ⟶ P`. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def L₀X₂ToP : S.L₀.X₂ ⟶ S.P := pullback.lift S.v₀₁.τ₂ S.L₀.g S.v₀₁.comm₂₃
@[reassoc]
lemma L₀X₂ToP_comp_pullback_snd : S.L₀X₂ToP ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = S.L₀.g := by simp
@[reassoc]
lemma L₀X₂ToP_comp_φ₁ : S.L₀X₂ToP ≫ S.φ₁ = 0 := by
simp only [← cancel_mono S.L₂.f, L₀X₂ToP, assoc, φ₂, φ₁_L₂_f,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, w₀₂_τ₂, zero_comp]
lemma L₀_g_δ : S.L₀.g ≫ S.δ = 0 := by
rw [← L₀X₂ToP_comp_pullback_snd, assoc]
erw [S.L₀'_exact.g_desc]
rw [L₀X₂ToP_comp_φ₁_assoc, zero_comp]
lemma δ_L₃_f : S.δ ≫ S.L₃.f = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi S.L₀'.g]
erw [S.L₀'_exact.g_desc_assoc]
simp [S.v₂₃.comm₁₂, φ₂]
/-- The short complex `L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def L₁' : ShortComplex C := ShortComplex.mk _ _ S.L₀_g_δ
/-- The short complex `L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def L₂' : ShortComplex C := ShortComplex.mk _ _ S.δ_L₃_f
/-- Exactness of `L₀.X₂ ⟶ L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁`. -/
lemma L₁'_exact : S.L₁'.Exact := by
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_exact_up_to_refinements]
intro A₀ x₃ hx₃
dsimp at x₃ hx₃
obtain ⟨A₁, π₁, hπ₁, p, hp⟩ := surjective_up_to_refinements_of_epi S.L₀'.g x₃
dsimp [L₀'] at p hp
have hp' : (p ≫ S.φ₁) ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁ = 0 := by
rw [assoc, ← S.snd_δ, ← reassoc_of% hp, hx₃, comp_zero]
obtain ⟨A₂, π₂, hπ₂, x₁, hx₁⟩ := S.exact_C₁_down.exact_up_to_refinements (p ≫ S.φ₁) hp'
dsimp at x₁ hx₁
let x₂' := x₁ ≫ S.L₁.f
let x₂ := π₂ ≫ p ≫ pullback.fst _ _
have hx₂' : (x₂ - x₂') ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂ = 0 := by
simp only [x₂, x₂', sub_comp, assoc, ← S.v₁₂.comm₁₂, ← reassoc_of% hx₁, φ₂, φ₁_L₂_f, sub_self]
let k₂ : A₂ ⟶ S.L₀.X₂ := S.exact_C₂_up.lift _ hx₂'
have hk₂ : k₂ ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₂ = x₂ - x₂' := S.exact_C₂_up.lift_f _ _
have hk₂' : k₂ ≫ S.L₀.g = π₂ ≫ p ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
simp only [x₂, x₂', ← cancel_mono S.v₀₁.τ₃, assoc, ← S.v₀₁.comm₂₃, reassoc_of% hk₂,
sub_comp, S.L₁.zero, comp_zero, sub_zero, pullback.condition]
exact ⟨A₂, π₂ ≫ π₁, epi_comp _ _, k₂, by simp only [assoc, L₁'_f, ← hk₂', hp]⟩
/-- The duality isomorphism `S.P ≅ Opposite.unop S.op.P'`. -/
noncomputable def PIsoUnopOpP' : S.P ≅ Opposite.unop S.op.P' := pullbackIsoUnopPushout _ _
/-- The duality isomorphism `S.P' ≅ Opposite.unop S.op.P`. -/
noncomputable def P'IsoUnopOpP : S.P' ≅ Opposite.unop S.op.P := pushoutIsoUnopPullback _ _
lemma op_δ : S.op.δ = S.δ.op := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by
rw [Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← cancel_mono (pushout.inr _ _ : _ ⟶ S.P'),
← cancel_epi (pullback.snd _ _ : S.P ⟶ _), S.snd_δ_inr,
← cancel_mono S.P'IsoUnopOpP.hom, ← cancel_epi S.PIsoUnopOpP'.inv,
P'IsoUnopOpP, PIsoUnopOpP', assoc, assoc, assoc, assoc,
pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inr_hom, pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_snd_assoc,
pushoutIsoUnopPullback_inl_hom, pullbackIsoUnopPushout_inv_fst_assoc]
apply Quiver.Hom.op_inj
simpa only [op_comp, Quiver.Hom.op_unop, assoc] using S.op.snd_δ_inr)
/-- The duality isomorphism `S.L₂'.op ≅ S.op.L₁'`. -/
noncomputable def L₂'OpIso : S.L₂'.op ≅ S.op.L₁' :=
ShortComplex.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
(by dsimp; simp only [id_comp, comp_id, S.op_δ])
/-- Exactness of `L₀.X₃ ⟶ L₃.X₁ ⟶ L₃.X₂`. -/
lemma L₂'_exact : S.L₂'.Exact := by
rw [← exact_op_iff, exact_iff_of_iso S.L₂'OpIso]
exact S.op.L₁'_exact
/-- The diagram `S.L₀.X₁ ⟶ S.L₀.X₂ ⟶ S.L₀.X₃ ⟶ S.L₃.X₁ ⟶ S.L₃.X₂ ⟶ S.L₃.X₃` for any
`S : SnakeInput C`. -/
noncomputable abbrev composableArrows : ComposableArrows C 5 :=
ComposableArrows.mk₅ S.L₀.f S.L₀.g S.δ S.L₃.f S.L₃.g
open ComposableArrows in
/-- The diagram `S.L₀.X₁ ⟶ S.L₀.X₂ ⟶ S.L₀.X₃ ⟶ S.L₃.X₁ ⟶ S.L₃.X₂ ⟶ S.L₃.X₃` is exact
for any `S : SnakeInput C`. -/
lemma snake_lemma : S.composableArrows.Exact :=
exact_of_δ₀ S.L₀_exact.exact_toComposableArrows
(exact_of_δ₀ S.L₁'_exact.exact_toComposableArrows
(exact_of_δ₀ S.L₂'_exact.exact_toComposableArrows
S.L₃_exact.exact_toComposableArrows))
lemma δ_eq {A : C} (x₃ : A ⟶ S.L₀.X₃) (x₂ : A ⟶ S.L₁.X₂) (x₁ : A ⟶ S.L₂.X₁)
(h₂ : x₂ ≫ S.L₁.g = x₃ ≫ S.v₀₁.τ₃) (h₁ : x₁ ≫ S.L₂.f = x₂ ≫ S.v₁₂.τ₂) :
x₃ ≫ S.δ = x₁ ≫ S.v₂₃.τ₁ := by
have H := (pullback.lift x₂ x₃ h₂) ≫= S.snd_δ
rw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc] at H
rw [H, ← assoc]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono S.L₂.f, assoc, φ₁_L₂_f, lift_φ₂, h₁]
variable (S₁ S₂ S₃ : SnakeInput C)
/-- A morphism of snake inputs involve four morphisms of short complexes
which make the obvious diagram commute. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom where
/-- a morphism between the zeroth lines -/
f₀ : S₁.L₀ ⟶ S₂.L₀
/-- a morphism between the first lines -/
f₁ : S₁.L₁ ⟶ S₂.L₁
/-- a morphism between the second lines -/
f₂ : S₁.L₂ ⟶ S₂.L₂
/-- a morphism between the third lines -/
f₃ : S₁.L₃ ⟶ S₂.L₃
comm₀₁ : f₀ ≫ S₂.v₀₁ = S₁.v₀₁ ≫ f₁ := by aesop_cat
comm₁₂ : f₁ ≫ S₂.v₁₂ = S₁.v₁₂ ≫ f₂ := by aesop_cat
comm₂₃ : f₂ ≫ S₂.v₂₃ = S₁.v₂₃ ≫ f₃ := by aesop_cat
namespace Hom
attribute [reassoc] comm₀₁ comm₁₂ comm₂₃
/-- The identity morphism of a snake input. -/
@[simps]
def id : Hom S S where
f₀ := 𝟙 _
f₁ := 𝟙 _
f₂ := 𝟙 _
f₃ := 𝟙 _
variable {S₁ S₂ S₃}
/-- The composition of morphisms of snake inputs. -/
@[simps]
def comp (f : Hom S₁ S₂) (g : Hom S₂ S₃) : Hom S₁ S₃ where
f₀ := f.f₀ ≫ g.f₀
f₁ := f.f₁ ≫ g.f₁
f₂ := f.f₂ ≫ g.f₂
f₃ := f.f₃ ≫ g.f₃
comm₀₁ := by simp only [assoc, comm₀₁, comm₀₁_assoc]
comm₁₂ := by simp only [assoc, comm₁₂, comm₁₂_assoc]
comm₂₃ := by simp only [assoc, comm₂₃, comm₂₃_assoc]
end Hom
instance : Category (SnakeInput C) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := Hom.comp
variable {S₁ S₂ S₃}
@[simp] lemma id_f₀ : Hom.f₀ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_f₁ : Hom.f₁ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_f₂ : Hom.f₂ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_f₃ : Hom.f₃ (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
section
variable (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (g : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
@[simp, reassoc] lemma comp_f₀ : (f ≫ g).f₀ = f.f₀ ≫ g.f₀ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc] lemma comp_f₁ : (f ≫ g).f₁ = f.f₁ ≫ g.f₁ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc] lemma comp_f₂ : (f ≫ g).f₂ = f.f₂ ≫ g.f₂ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc] lemma comp_f₃ : (f ≫ g).f₃ = f.f₃ ≫ g.f₃ := rfl
end
/-- The functor which sends `S : SnakeInput C` to its zeroth line `S.L₀`. -/
@[simps]
def functorL₀ : SnakeInput C ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj S := S.L₀
map f := f.f₀
/-- The functor which sends `S : SnakeInput C` to its zeroth line `S.L₁`. -/
@[simps]
def functorL₁ : SnakeInput C ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj S := S.L₁
map f := f.f₁
/-- The functor which sends `S : SnakeInput C` to its second line `S.L₂`. -/
@[simps]
def functorL₂ : SnakeInput C ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj S := S.L₂
map f := f.f₂
/-- The functor which sends `S : SnakeInput C` to its third line `S.L₃`. -/
@[simps]
def functorL₃ : SnakeInput C ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj S := S.L₃
map f := f.f₃
/-- The functor which sends `S : SnakeInput C` to the auxiliary object `S.P`,
which is `pullback S.L₁.g S.v₀₁.τ₃`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def functorP : SnakeInput C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.P
map f := pullback.map _ _ _ _ f.f₁.τ₂ f.f₀.τ₃ f.f₁.τ₃ f.f₁.comm₂₃.symm
(congr_arg ShortComplex.Hom.τ₃ f.comm₀₁.symm)
map_id _ := by dsimp [P]; simp
| map_comp _ _ := by dsimp [P]; aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
lemma naturality_φ₂ (f : S₁ ⟶ S₂) : S₁.φ₂ ≫ f.f₂.τ₂ = functorP.map f ≫ S₂.φ₂ := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/SnakeLemma.lean | 481 | 484 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.